Selected quad for the lemma: law_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
law_n common_a court_n equity_n 4,332 5 10.6896 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A27455 An argument shewing that 'tis impossible for the nation to be rid of the grievances occasion'd by the marshal of the King's-Bench, and warden of the Fleet, without an utter extirpation of their present offices with proposals for a new constitution of those offices by way of letter to a member of Parliament. J. B. (John Berisford) 1699 (1699) Wing B1962; ESTC R5834 20,197 36

There are 7 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

may be done especially when the Statute hath by so strong an Implication given the Court Power and Authority to make such another Rule if they think fit I shall Conclude this Head with an Observation how much this Modern Practice of letting Prisoners go at Large by Day-Rules differs from the Ancient Usage for in the Year-Book of the 39 Hen. VI. 33. is this remarkable Passage That the Court of King's-Bench used every Term Once or Twice to send the Coroner to the Marshal's Prison to see all the Prisoners and if any of them were wanting he Mark'd their Names in a Book and Inform'd the Judges of it and upon this the Court would ask the Marshal what was become of his Prisoners and if he could not shew a sufficient Cause to Excuse himself the Court did Record the Escapes of every one of 'em upon him A very laudable Custom and if it were Revived at this Day we need not be asham'd of the Old Fashion But this would Redound too much to the Marshal's disadvantage who by these Day-Rules alone may easily get Two Hundred Guinea's a Term for tho' the Prisoners have a Rule which the Marshal himself is very Solicitous to procure for 'em yet there is no Stirring without coming to some Agreement with him and suppose the Bargain to be struck up for a Hundred Prisoners at Two Guinea's a Head it comes to that Sum and all that he pays out of these Vast Perquisites is only a few New-Years-Gifts and such like Trifles perhaps the Clerk of the Rules may also have a small Acknowledgment for his great Favours Sir by this time I hope you are satisfied That the Commencement of this Act hath but an indifferent Aspect and for this reason I do not expect any great Benefit from the other parts of it for we have this Maxim in the Law Quae malo inchoata sunt Principio vix bono peraguntur fine and I doubt this will Appear too Obvious when we come to consider the Conclusion of this Act. But by the way I cannot but take Notice of that Clause by which all Conveyances and all Trusts and Declarations of Trusts c. any way relating to the Offices of Marshal or Warden are to be Inrolled The Mischief at Common Law was that there were so many Secret Trusts of those Offices such frequent Shiftings and Transferrings of the Mortgages and other Securities to which the Profits were Subject that 't was Morally Impossible for the Plaintiff to know against whom to bring his Action or to have any Remedy And there were always Private Articles between the Superiour Marshal or Warden or the Person who had their Interest and the Temporary Marshal or Warden who did actually Officiate by which the Rents and Profits were totally Reserved to the Superiours and the others were Obliged upon all Occasions to follow their Directions and to give up and Surrender at Command So that these Underlings have all along been only Servants and meer Tools nothing but Statues set up to receive the Shot of the Creditors and to Skreen their Masters from any harm and when one is Pierced thro' and thro' down he Tumbles and another such Logg is Advanced in his Room But besides there is this to be Considered That tho' the Plaintiff does know who is the Superiour Warden or Marshal or to whom the Profits of these Offices are Subject or Conveyed in Mortgage or in Trust c. yet whether this Knowledge would now better his Case in respect of any Action to be brought or of his having any other Remedy 'T is true the Stat. of Westm 2 Car. 11. is express That where the Inferior Officer is not sufficient his Superiour shall Answer for the Escape of the Prisoner and that was the Duke of Norfolk's Case 39 H. 6.34 But against whom shall this Action be brought If against the Superiour you 'll have the same Effect as if it were against the Inferiour for the Proverb is here Inverted it being Like Man like Master you can have nothing but Bones if you can have that from either of 'em Briggs and Lenthall are of the same Leanness tho' one seems Plumper in the Face than t'other for the Reversion of these Offices is not so Clear and Free as it was in the good Days of Henry the Sixth It has been long since Loaded and Incumbred with Mighty Burdens it is ready to Sink and Expire beneath the Weight of ' em So that the Superiour's Interest being so far involv'd in Mortgages and other Incumbrances let us see whether you have any Remedy against the Persons who Claim under those Titles and I conceive there is none for in your Action of Debt against any of them you must Declare according to the Statute That since the Custos Gaolae non habeat unde solvat respondeat superior suus qui Custodiam hujusmodi Gaolae sibi Commisit c. But the Mortgagee or Trustee is not the Superiour Marshal or Warden neither did they know who Committed the Custody of the Goal for they concern themselves only for the Profits and not about him who actually Officiates Besides this would be Confounding Jurisdictions and Mixing the Courts of Common Law and Equity together for Mortgages and Trusts are the proper Objects of a Court of Conscience And indeed as I conceive Estates in Trust were not Subject to any Judgment Statute or Recognizance at Common Law until the Statute of Frauds and Perjuries by which it is Enacted That the Sheriff may make and deliver Execution of all such Lands Tenements and Hereditaments as any other Person or Persons be in any manner of wise Seized or Possessed in Trust for him against whom Execution is Sued as the Sheriff might have done in Case the Party himself had been actually Seized c. So that since this Statute if any Person had been Seized of the Reversion of these Offices in Trust for the Superiour Marshal or Warden no doubt but it would have been liable to Execution as well in the Hands of one as t'other But this is not our Case for the Trustees here are Seized in Trust for the Mortgagees or other Persons who Claim under the several Incumbrances with which these Offices are Charged by the Superiour Marshal or Warden So that tho' these Titles are Inroll'd yet they afford the Creditor but a Melancholly Prospect since they are wholly Exempted from and in point of time Prior to his Action and consequently must Command Precedency And for the same reason the mighty hopes of speedy Justice which People had Conceived of the Sequestration Clause are also Vanished The words of it are as follows The Judges shall after Oath made that the Judgment was obtain'd without Fraud upon Motion Sequester the Fees and Profits of the Office of Marshal and Warden and in the first place apply the same towards Satisfaction of the Debt or Debts due from the Prisoner who Escaped This indeed as well as the last Clause I mention'd
hence is That the Rules of Court ought not to be taken upon Trust nor as if they were undoubtedly Legal because they are Rules of Court And therefore if any such have been made in respect of the Rules of the Fleet and King's-Bench Prisons it may be reasonable for a Parliament to Enquire into the Justice and Validity of them And this brings me to Consider that other part of the Enacting Clause where 't is said That no Prisoner shall be suffered to go at large except by Virtue of some Habeas Corpus or Rule of Court which Rule of Court shall not be Granted but by Motion made or Petition read in Open Court c. So that if there be a Rule of Court for it a Prisoner now may lawfully go abroad This is I Confess an Extraordinary Clause and looks as if a Judge himself or at least some Body who was pretty sure of being one had Penn'd it for it gives the Court an Arbitrary or which Tantamounts a Discretionary Power to Release all the Prisoners in England I don't say or believe that they will ever Exert it to such a height But why should the Court have a Power to do it if they please Why should the Debtors Restraint any more than the Creditors Liberty be Precarious Since the same Laws are the Measures of both and a Violation of the one may soon be followed by a Violation of the other for they who have an Absolute Power to give Liberty may in time pretend to that of Restraint 'T is true we are Secure from all Apprehensions of this Nature during the present Government who may doubtless Challenge all the Reigns since the Conquest to produce a more August and Reverend Bench for Learning Temper and Integrity So that it seems the peculiar Happiness of His Majesties mighty Genius to be Blessed with Council at Home equal to the Success of his Arms Abroad that he might Triumph both in Peace and War But 't is Posterity that I am labouring for What if in process of time a Deluge of Oppression and Tyranny should again Overwhelm us What if such a Sett of precious Judges should be trumpt up as the late Reign produced Some of which were the Scum and Refuse of the Law a Disgrace and Scandal to the Robes they Wore and all but one were base Deserters of their Countrey 's Cause and were cull'd out for no other End but to put the great Machine of Arbitrary Power into Motion which they did effectually Perform by prostituting the Laws Religion Honour and Justice of the English Nation to the Vile Lust of a Superstitious and Despotick Monarch But as I was Observing how Dangerous would it be to Intrust such a Power in the Hands of Renegado and Apostate Judges who might Raise Vast and Immense Sums by Granting such Rules of Enlargement If the late Lord Chief Justice Sir Robert W. had been Invested by Act of Parliament with such a Discretionary Power he might in his great Wisdom have thought it an Easier and more Honourable Way of Supplying his Necessities than by Mortgaging his Estate a Second time and adding Perjury to the Bargain by making an Affidavit that 't was free from all Incumbrances besides he might have thought this Power a Perquisite to his Place and that he might Justifie this Method of making up the Loss of his Sallary the greatest part of which went on t'other side of the Hall I know it may be Objected That never such a General Rule of Enlargement was made nor perhaps ever thought on before or since the making of the Act tho' I shall quote one by and by which was made long before that Act and comes pretty near it and that this Rule of Court which is Excepted in the Act is commonly understood of Day-Rules and that only such are Granted Tho' I should acknowledge this to be true yet it admits of an easie Answer for I am only Arguing that the Court May Grant a General Rule of Enlargement by Virtue of this Act and so they May Grant other Rules by Virtue of it As for Instance I don't see but the Court may now Grant a Rule to bring up a Prisoner to be a Witness at a Tryal at Bar or to carry him to York to be a Witness at a Tryal there or upon any other Occasion the Court shall think proper Whereas before the late Act I do not think such a Rule was sufficient to Secure the Keeper from an Action of Escape There is an Authority to this purpose in 1 Sid. 13. That if a Habeas Corpus ad testificandum be directed to a Gaoler to bring up a Prisoner who is in Execution to be a Witness If the Goaler by Virtue of this Writ brings the Prisoner yet this is an Escape for which he is Answerable and why should a Rule of Court have a greater prevalence and force than the King 's Writ which has been Established by the Common Law time Immemorial But pray let us Consider a little the Nature of these Day-Rules and how far they will stand the Test of a Legal Examination This Rule it seems is made every Day in Term upon Motion or Petition in which it is Suggested by the Prisoners that they have Extraordinary Occasions to go Abroad to Direct their Attorneys and Advise with Councel about their Business and the like Upon this the Court makes a Rule for them accordingly but t is suppos'd they are to have a Keeper with 'em tho' if they have that will not alter the Case But the question is Whether the Common Law does Allow that a Prisoner in Execution may be permitted in any Case to go and Advise with his Councel tho' it may be about Matters which relate to the Cause of his Imprisonment And I conceive that the Common Law does not Indulge any such Liberty And for this I rely on Two Substantial Authorities The First is in Plowden's Commentaries 360. where 't is said that a Man in Prison hath not liberty to go at Large to make his Entry or Claim or to seek Councel The Other is in Co. Lit. 259. where 't is also said That a Man Imprison'd shall not be bound by a Descent for that by the Intendment of Law he is kept without Intelligence of things Abroad and hath not Liberty to make his Entry or Claim or to seek for Councel I 'll quote one Case more and that is Mostin's Case in my Lord Dyer 297. which was this Mostin being in Execution in the Fleet the Lord Treasurer and the Barons of the Exchequer Commands by their Order or Rule of Court that the Warden should let the Prisoner go at Large accordingly the Prisoner was let loose but the Warden in those times paid for 't in an Action of Escape brought against him in the Common Pleas where his Justification under the Rule of Court was not Allow'd So that here 's a President of a General Rule of Enlargement and what has been done
AN ARGUMENT SHEWING That 't is Impossible for the NATION to be Rid of the GRIEVANCES Occasion'd by the Marshal of the KING'S-BENCH and Warden of the FLEET without an Utter Extirpation of their present Offices WITH PROPOSALS FOR A New Constitution Of those Offices By way of Letter to a Member of Parliament Cuncta prius tentanda sed immedicabile vulnus Euse recidendum est ne pars sincera trahatur Ovid Met. Lib. 1. London Printed for Richard Standfast Bookseller near Temple-Bar MDCXCIX TO Sir William Duncombe Bar. SIR THO' I have not the Honour of an Acquaintance with you yet since I found your Name in the Printed Votes as a Petitioner for Redress against the Warden of the Fleet and that you were so great an Instance of the Oppression which the Gentry of England as well as the Tradesmen and Commonalty labour under I presum'd to Affix your Name to these Papers which I 'm sure are wrote with no other Design than to Advance the Publick Advantage by endeavouring to Suppress a Nest of Pestilent Vipers who have Stung and been equally Pernicious to all Ranks and Degrees of Men except only those who have nothing to lose The Riches of England consists in Land and Trade which are the Pillars of the Government and must be Maintained and Supported but both are Weakened and Terribly Shaken by the Defect in Execution of the Legal Process Lands have lost their Ancient Value and do not Answer the Profits as formerly For how many Knavish Tenants do continually decline to pay their Rents or go off with good round Sums in their Pockets and when their Landlords call 'em to Account and fling 'em into the Country Gaol the next News they hear is of a Habeas Corpus to Remove 'em to the King's-Bench or Fleet and in a Fortnights time down they come and take another Farm next Hedge to their former Landlords As for the City where Trade does chiefly flourish That Suffers infinitely more for as Differences on Contracts and Bargains do arise so there are more frequent Opportunities of Repairing to the Law for Satisfaction And one would think that an honest Debt for Goods Sold and Deliver'd should be Paid but unless a Man will be a Law to himself which we can hardly hope for in this degenerate Age there is no Money to be had the Creditor may Arrest him and have Judgment against him and Charge him in Execution and what then Why then he comes Abroad and there 's an end of the matter pudet haec opprobia nobis Et dici potuisse non potuisse refelli I ever thought that Trade had been the Darling of the English Nation and shall we tamely see such Rapes and Violences Committed on her who ought certainly to be Cherished and Improved with all the Tenderness and Care imaginable 'T was the Policy of our Ancestors to respect her as the Guardian-Angel of their Island and shall the present Fathers of our Countrey now look on with Vnconcern Can they behold these Horrid Violations and not at all be mov'd Certainly they can't Imagine but that such Wretched Treatment must mightily Discourage Trade It can't but strike a Damp upon the Careful Merchant and the Industrious Tradesman when they Consider That after all their Pains and Sedulous Application the Labours of some Years may all be lost in fewer Moments For they are forc'd to seek Returns by Sale of their Commodities with reasonable Profit and for this Credit must necessarily be given Now if they happen to Trust a Knave as modestly speaking 't is two to one but they do their Prime Cost is also gone and sunk for 't is plain there 's no Remedy to Recover it what is this but a Stab into the very Heart of Trade I 'm told it was a regard to Trade which was one of the principal Motives that induc'd the Parliament to Suppress the late pretended Priviledg'd Places where the Law was Cramp'd in the Execution and consequently Trade receiv'd a vast prejudice But 't is in vain to destroy some Nusances if they leave others still remaining which are worse and more Dangerous As the Wounds of Friends strike Deeper and are more Fatal than those of Open Enemies And as Extortions by Colour of Offices and Justice are greater Offences than down-right Exactions for that they pretend Law the greatest Blessing of the Subject for the Countenance of Villany and Wrong But I hope the Parliament will take this particular also into Consideration That the White-Fryars and Mint are not Crushed so long as the Prisons of the King's-Bench and Fleet are in Being for 't is now become a Common Practice for Bankrupts and Cheating Knaves themselves to run into one as they did into the other for Shelter and Protection I am SIR Your Humble Servant J. B. An ARGUMENT shewing That 't is Impossible for the Nation to be Rid of the Grievances Occasion'd by the Marshal of the King's-Bench and Warden of the Fleet without an Vtter Extirpation of their present Offices With Proposals for a New Constitution of those Offices c. SIR SINCE I am inform'd that the Grand Inquest of the Nation hath Resolved once more to take the Abuses of the King's-Bench Prison and Fleet into Consideration I thought it my Duty as an English Man who by Birthright am Intitul'd to all the Benefits of the Noblest Constitution in the World to offer my Sentiments in Order to have these Grievances Redressed which have so long Eclips'd the Glory of it by depriving us of the Fruit and Execution of the Law which Consequently must Languish and Expire since it is Wounded in the Vital Part for Executio Legis est Anima Legis And without the Soul the Letter of it is but a Dead Carcass which can't preserve nor be preserved from Ruin so that a Failure of Justice it self must necessarily follow than which there can't be a greater Scandal and Reproach to Government I shall Entertain you no longer upon a Subject which is so Obvious to Common View neither shall I recite to you the particular Villanies and Oppressions of the Marshal and Warden for to Rake into Dunghills and their Prisons are the same thing nought but Stench and Noisomeness can thence arise besides we ought to take those Matters for granted since the late Act of Parliament does expresly set forth in the Preamble That by reason of the many grievous Extortions and ill Practices of such Persons who have for several Years last past respectively Executed the Offices of Marshal of the King's-Bench and Warden of the Fleet both Creditors and Debtors have been notoriously Abused and the good Intents of the Law wholly Eluded And Sir I am sorry to say such a Fatality attends those Prisons that even the good Intent of that Statute seems also to be wholly Eluded as well as that of the Common Law The Complaints of this Sessions do abundantly testifie the Truth of this Assertion for tho' in pursuance of that
Statute some Persons have Recovered Judgments in Actions of Escapes against those Officers yet here also they are come to their Journeys end and after all their Tedious and Expensive Travel find nought but Labour for their Pains So that all those excellent Provisions against those Grievances are rendred Useless and Insignificant and all the mighty Advantages which that Act was thought to Produce prove Imperfect and Abortive and our great Expectations are Dwindl'd into Air. Thus I have given you a short State of this Malignant Distemper which has so long raged in the Bowels of the Body Politick a Distemper not in its Infancy it has been growing on us for some Ages past and is arrived now to its full Strength and Vigour it seems to be Radicated in the Blood and dares Maintain its Post Bravado like and bids Defiance to the feeble Acts of vulgar Physick so that the Common Law having been baffled by this Potent Enemy the Legislature must be call'd upon for Aid And nothing under Heaven but the Power and Wisdom of an English Parliament can stop the Progress of so Inveterate a Canker to the Common Wealth And I submit it to their Consideration whether they must not now pursue the same Methods in this mighty Cure as some Physicians use in Chronical Diseases where all the Nervous Juices and the whole Mass of Nature are Corrupted Viz. a Thorough Flux that the whole Malignancy may be rooted up and a new Stream of Blood run in fresh and untainted Channels And therefore unless there be an Intirely New Constitution in these Offices unless their Old Bottom and Foundation be not only Shaken but totally Destroyed I am of Opinion that all other Remedies will be but patching we may be Eased a while from Pain but the rank Poison still remains and will soon get Head again in spight of all those Temporary Applications Now Sir to come to the main Point in Order for a Redress I take the First Step towards it to be an Enquiry into the Cause of this Mischief and for this we must Trace the Original Fountain from whence these Offices proceed And I take it that in their Primitive State they were derived from the King who being Intrusted with the whole Executive part of the Law thought fit to Grant those Offices by Letters Patents either for Life as Henry the Fourth did to William Finborough 2 Rol. Abr. 152. Or in Fee-Tail as Henry the Sixth did to the Duke of Norfolk 39 Hen. VI. 34. Or sometimes for a Term of Years as King James the First did to Sir James Elphinstone tho' this was adjudged a void Grant 9 Rep. 96. And last of all these Offices were Granted in Fee-Simple And the First Grant of this Nature of the Marshal's Office that I have met with was by King Charles the First to Sir John Lenthall under whose Title the present Proprietors Claim What I Observe from these Grants is this That those who first advis'd the Kings of England to Grant such Estates in those Offices to Private Persons might be good Courtiers but I am sure they were but indifferent Patriots they Consulted their Princes Profit and perhaps raised a good Sum for the present but they forgot their Countrey 's Interest and had no regard to Posterity for by Granting such long and absolute Estates great Inconveniencies to the Publick have Ensued As First That such Estates being Inheritances the Owner may make 'em Subect to Judgments Mortgages and other Incumbrances from which Two Mischiefs do arise One That this Office may be under continual Distraction always tearing to Pieces by the several Creditors by which the safe Custody of the Prisoners must be neglected And the Other That no Creditor knows against whom to bring his Action for an Escape for that those Incumbrances are made in Secret and always Shifting from one to another industriously to Cheat the Plaintiff so that the Profits of the Office cannot possibly be reach'd and 't is no answer to say there is a Marshal and Warden constantly Sworn whose Bodies are liable to the Plaintiffs Action for the Body when in Prison is no Satisfaction but only a Pledge for the Debt till it be Satisfied Besides the Bodies also of the Marshal and Warden are Priviledg'd from being taken in Execution and so it was Resolved in Sid. Rep. 68. And I would put this Case Suppose the Warden of the Fleet who hath his Office in Fee Dies his Son and Heir being at that time Imprison'd there and the Office descends to him being in Prison now the Law Judges him to be immediately at Large tho' he has Fetters on his Feet because he cannot keep himself in Prison There 's another Case in Plowden fol. 37. And that is Where a Woman is Warden of the Fleet by Descent or Purchase and one in Prison Marries the Feme who is Warden the Law Adjudges him out of Prison for he cannot be in Ward to his Wife tho' perhaps some others are so that here is also a Lawful Escape tho' it seems a little Odd that Right and Wrong should be the same thing and joined together Yet 't is so here for an Escape is certainly Tortious and Unjust and yet for an Inheritance to Descend and for a Woman to Marry is surely rightful and just Then for the Declaration in this Action of Escape against either of 'em it must be a Special one indeed for the Plaintiff Declares That the Son or the Husband being in Custody did so negligently keep himself that he did permit himself to go at large against the Plaintiffs consent c. Ay and against his own Consent to for the Law would have it so whether he would or no The Son was only Passive and suffered the Inheritance to Descend upon him and 't is hard a Man should be punished for having an Estate The Husband indeed was Active and push'd forward to Matrimony but 't is as hard that he should be punished for a Righteous and Holy Act. I have dwelt the longer upon these Cases for that I conceive they give a lively Instance of the Difficulties which the Grants of those Offices in Fee have brought upon the Common Law which are no less than the Subversion of Fundamentals for the very Definition of the Law it self is destroyed Lex est Sanctio sancta jubens honesta prohibens contraria by these Examples the Law forbids honest things and commands unjust and absurd things that is not to Marry nor to have an Estate of Inheritance Descend upon the Heir what is this but Jargon and Contradiction to the last Degree These and many other Defects were Incorporated with the first Institution of these Offices upon the Foundation of Inheritance but as in other Cases so in this Ex uno dato absurdo mille sequuntur and certainly a thousand Tricks Frauds Shams and Rogueries with a long Train of Oppressions Extortions Rapines and unheard of Cruelties have been Occasion'd by that Fatal Grant Witness
so many hundred Families of English Freeborn Subjects both of Creditors and Debtors who by these Merciless Harpies have been Compelled much against their Wills to Agree in the same Funeral Pile of Common Ruine so that if there can be any Motives from the Topicks of Honour Justice and Compassion sufficient to Engage the Fathers of our Countrey for an Effectual Redress of all these Wrongs certainly they are to be found here or no where in the World I am very sensible that the Parliament hath already Interposed as appears by the Act made in the Eighth and Ninth of His present Majesty But my Complaint is That the Incomparable and Excellent Design of that Act is altogether frustrated the Remedy is not advanced nor the Mischief at Common Law suppressed And therefore 't is that I pray a Melius Inquirendum That our Great and Wise Legislators would Indulge us with a Bill of Review in Order to Re-examine the whole Matter and to make a strict Enquiry into the Grounds and Causes upon which so Noble a Design Miscarried And this leads me to the Consideration of the late Act of Parment First It is Enacted That all Prisoners who are or shall be Committed to the Custody of the Marshal of the King's-Bench Prison or Warden of the Fleet shall be actually Detained in the said Prisons of the King's-Bench and Fleet or the respective Rules of the same And if the said Marshal or Warden shall permit and suffer any Prisoner Committed to their Custody either on Mesne Process or Execution to Go or be at Large out of the Rules of their respective Prisons except by Virtue of Habeas Corpus or Rule of Court which Rule shall not be Granted but by Motion made or Petition read in Open Court every such going or being out of the said Rules shall be Adjudged and Deemed to be an Escape I am at a loss what is meant by these Rules neither can I find one of the Old Law Books that will furnish me with an Exposition of that Word in reference to Prisons Indeed the Rule of Law is the Measure and Standard of it which is grounded upon the most solid and refined Reason imaginable a Reason acquired by long Study Observation and Experience But the other sort of Rules are the Reverse and Antipodes of the Rule of Law the one is an Opposite and flat Contradiction to the other There is so vast and wide a Difference between them that they are no more to be Reconciled than the North and Southern Poles for the Rules of these Prisons do plainly Trample upon all the Rules in Law Sir I will only give you a few Instances for I labour to be short and am afraid to exceed the bounds of an Epistle I shall first quote to you the Case of Sir George Reynell in my Lord Coke 9 Rep. 97. where 't is Resolved by the Judges that this very Office of the Marshal of the King's-Bench Prison was an Office of great Trust annexed to the Person and concerns the Administration of Justice and the Life of the Law which are to keep those who are in Execution in salva arcta Custodia to the end that they may the sooner pay their Debts c. And in the same Book fol. 87. it is said That every Keeper ought to Secure his Prisoner in salva arcta Custodia so that such Prisoner by the Common Law shall avoid a Descent Cast or Fine Levyed during his Imprisonment because the Law presumes in respect of his strict Ward he cannot have Conusance of the Disseisin or Fine to Command an Entry or Claim to be made and so are the Old Books Bracton l. 6. 3. f. 436. Britton 116. and Fleta l. 6. c. 52 53. Now let us consider the Nature of the Rules of those Prisons and make our Application Those Rules then do contain such a particular Space of Ground Adjacent to the Prisons as the Rules of the King's-Bench do Comprehend The Park St. George's-street and some other Places And the Rules of the Fleet Ludgate-hill the Old-Baily c. In any of these Places 't is Lawful for the Prisoners if they may he call'd so of either of those Prisons to Reside And in Fact abundance of 'em are to the great Expence and Vexation of themselves and Creditors Lodg'd up and down within these Rules First to their own Expence for that they not only pay Rent for their Lodgings with their Landlord but they must also give Extravagant and Excessive Rates for a Chamber which they are supposed to have within the Prison Indeed the late Act has reduced the Old Exorbitant Rates to Two Shillings and Six Pence per Week and that not to be Paid neither unless they are in actual Possession of such Chamber within rhe Prison and if the Marshal or Warden demands any greater Rent he Forfeits Twenty Pound One would have thought that these Words being so plain and express this Mischief had been Redress'd but 't is still the same the Name is only chang'd for the poor Prisoner must pay according to the Ancient Rate only now no Rent is demanded but all is Shelter'd under the Notion of Civility-Money and if he does not Discharge this Acknowledgment the Mirmidons will quickly Dragg him into the real Prison and teach him better Manners This Contrivance puts me in mind of the Old Romish Priests upon whom my Lord Coke has this Observation That for some Ages together they still found some Evasions to Creep out of the Statutes of Mortmaine But Henry the Eighth took a true Method to Obviate this and other Mischiefs which those Locusts in the Common Wealth had introduced by pulling 'em up both Root and Branch Then as to their Creditors it can't but be a mighty Vexation to them to think that after all their Trouble and Costs at Law to Charge their Debtors in Execution by which they propos'd only the Confinement of their Bodies that yet notwithstanding all their Endeavours they should in spight of 'em have their Liberty it can't but Teaz an honest Tradesman to his Soul to see his Debtor under Condemnation Strut it with his Sword and Nose him at his very Door That this is Fact no Body can deny for 't is the Daily Practice of all those pretended Prisoners in the Rules to walk where they please in all the several Parts of the Town and to be sure they 'll Cross the Street on purpose to put their Creditors on the Fret and Brave it to their Faces Besides some Creditors on Ludgate-hill are so unfortunate as to have their Debtors come and Live next Door to them perhaps the Creditor and Debtor may Lodge in the same House and this is worse than only losing the Debt for he 's Laught at to boot Can this Creditor think any thing but that the Law is a Jest He can't think it in Earnest sure when it calls his Debtor's Lodging there an Imprisonment and his Debtor a Prisoner for by the
same Parity of Reason the Creditors Lodging is also a Prison and the Creditor himself is become a Prisoner He may well cry out this is a Dream or else we live in an Age of Miracles and Contradictions But Sir that which I insist on is That not only the Going of these Sham-Prisoners out of those Places they call the Rules but also their Living within 'em out of the Prison is an Escape in Law But I must not be understood to mean that their being out of the Prisons of the King's-Bench and Fleet only is an Escape if they are in any other Prison it is well enough I know it was Adjudged in Cro. Car. 210. that the King's-Bench Prison was not Local but any Place where a Man is Restrain'd of his Liberty is a Prison and in the same Book fol. 266. It is Resolved by all the Judges of England That the Wardon of the Fleet and the Marshal of the King's-Bench may keep their Prisoners in any other Place of the County But then they ought to be kept as Prisoners Sub salva arcta Custodia Whereas in our Case 't is not pretended that they are in Custody within these Rules nor that there is any manner of Keeper with 'em they have the same Freedom and Liberty of Egress and Regress with other Persons to Go and Come when they please without any manner of Guard du Corps attending of 'em perhaps some of the more Cautious when they are to go Abroad amongst their Creditors will now and then take a Follower with 'em but however in point of Law this won't do neither for 't is Adjudged in Boyton's Case the 3 Rep. 44. and so is my Lord Dyer 278. and Hub. 202. That if the Sheriff suffer the Prisoner to go abroad with a Bayliff or Keeper yet this is an Escape for that he ought to be kept in Safe and Strait Custody which can't be said when his Arms and Legs are at Liberty with his Sword by his Side and only one Scoundrel to Attend him There are Multitudes of Authorities which shew the Strictness and Severity of the Law as to the Confinement of the Prisoner's Body And the Political Reason of this Rigorous Usage is That the Prisoner being uneasie under it might the sooner be induced to regain his Liberty by Discharging his Just and Honest Debts So that since the Rules of these Prisons do directly Subvert the Good and Ancient Maxims of the Common Law it will certainly be worth the Enquiry of the Committee to know when and by what Authority these Rules were first set on Foot and whether the present Use of 'em does Answer to their Original Institution I Confess I have Endeavoured to Trace 'em to the Fountain from whence they first Sprung but the first and only Book where I find the Rules taken Notice of is in Sid. Rep. 384. where 't is said by my Lord Chief Justice Keeling That by reason of the Removal from other Prisons there being more Prisoners than the Kings-Bench Prison could contain therefore the Prison was Enlarged by the Direction of the Court which Enlargement is call'd the Rules which are Houses Adjacent Hired by the Marshal So that here the Authority appears by which they were introduced viz. by the Direction of the Court and I don't see any harm in this Direction if it was only to Enlarge his Prison-House or to keep the Prisoners in another House and Place provided they are kept in Safe Custody But what if these Rules of late Years are Degenerated and are quite of another Nature from those which were at first Allowed For now the Rules are not Hired Houses by the Marshal nor any part of a Prison they scorn the Scandal of that opprobrious Name the Gentlemen only take Lodgings for their Conveniency within certain Places called the Rules And what if these Rules as they are Established upon this new Bottom should also be Approv'd of by the Rule and Direction of the Court Why truly if the Case should be so I take it clearly That this Rule and Direction of the Court is against the Law of England This may seem a little roundly Exprest and perhaps may look somewhat Peremptory to those who don't Consider That the Judges are but Men Humanum est Errare says my Lord Coke the great Oracle of our Law who himself could not escape being Censured especially in the Zenith of his Court Preferments So the Lord Chief Justice Keeling was mistaken in Point of Law when he Fin'd and Committed some of the Jury to Prison for not giving a Verdict to his Mind which Error he acknowledg'd upon his Knees at the Bar of the House of Commons So it appears in 1 Sid. 218. that the whole Court of King's-Bench mistook the Law when by their Rule they Imposed a Watch and Ward in Westminster and laid a Tax upon the Inhabitants to defray the Expence of it This was indeed a pretty bold Stroke or certainly a Prodigious Mist clouded their Understandings for every vulgar Eye might at first Glance discover the Weakness of that Rule which was made in direct Opposition of the great Priviledge of Parliament and I wonder they escaped the severest Censure of it But my Lord Chief Justice Scroggs had not so good luck for one of the Articles of Impeachment against him was for that he had caus'd an Illegal and Arbitrary Rule to be Entred in the Court of King's-Bench against the Printing of the Weekly Packet of Advice from Rome 't was his Misfortune but the Nation 's Happiness that he liv'd at a time when the Parliament would not suffer the meanest Englishman to be Oppressed with Impunity It was that Immortal and Prophetick Parliament commonly called the Exclusion Parliament And since I chance to mention that Generous and Heroick Senate I can't forbear making this short Observation It was Cassandra-like theirs and the whole Nation 's unspeakable Calamity not to be believed for which Stubborn and vastly Pernicious and only not Fatal Blindness of the Church for there it went What a Chain of Horrours Darkness and Confusions did Ensue What a Scene of Tragical Tyrannies and Depredations were every where Display'd throughout the British Isle Our Civil Rights were Lost and intirely Swallowed up by that Voracious Monster called Prerogative of the Crown and our Religious ones were reduced to the very Brink and Precipice of Destruction But when the Church looked down and saw the great Abyss in which they were Eternally to sink then they Cry'd out for help and Providence brought 'em an Assistance which hath 't is true Redeem'd us but not without the Expence of Millions of Sacrifices Offered up not of Beasts as those of the Ancients were but of the Noblest Human Blood and Treasure But after this small Digression to pursue the Thread of my Discourse I was giving you some Instances where the Courts in Westminster-Hall have given Signal Proofs of their Fallibility And what I infer from
would have been of excellent use in Diebus illis when the Sky was Serene and Clear and no Clouds Overshadow'd any part of the Office But now since the whole is cover'd with Mists and Obscure Intreagues the Scene is quite Alter'd the Judges are at a loss where to find the Profits or if they are found out by the Inrollment yet they must be Excused for they are Pre-ingaged and all Pre-ingagements must in Justice as well as Honour be Allow'd of And therefore tho' the former part of the Statute does positively Affirm That the Fees and Profits shall in the first place be Applied towards Satisfaction of the Prisoner's Debts yet the latter part does as positively Deny it For that Saves all the Rights Titles Interests and Securities of Johnson Boulter Norwood c. which they have in the said Offices or the Profits thereof And now Their Demands must be first Satisfied so that this Unfortunate Act of Parliament Commits a Violence on its self seems to be a Felo de se and by a Fatal Contradiction gives its own Heart a Mortal Wound And after all Suppose the Judges should Sequester the poor Remnant of the Profits if any such there be when all the Pre-ingagements are Discharg'd I would then ask this single Question by whom shall the Marshal or Warden who does Officiate be paid his Sallary for the poor Creature must have a Livelihood I doubt the Court will want their Officer unless they can suppose that one Skeleton may live upon another for by this time both the Office and Officer must be reduc'd to a mighty thin Contexture I have now done with this Famous Act of Parliament of which we were so big with Expectation and I 'm sorry it should be said at last Parturiunt Montes Having thus made the Way Clear and I hope given you Convincing Proofs Drawn from the Sacred Repositories of our Law that the present Foundation as well as Management of these Offices is Diametrically Opposite to the reason of the Common Law and wholly Inconsistent with the Noble Frame of the English Happy Constitution I come now to Offer my Humble PROPOSALS to the Parliament for a New and Regular Establishment of these Offices which in themselves I own are an Essential part of the Common Wealth I. That the present Officers of the King's-Bench and Fleet the Marshals and Wardens Superiour and Inferiour with all the Train of Rubbish which Attends 'em may be Dismiss'd their further Service and tho' these Miscreants have been such Unprofitable Servants to all Mankind but themselves and by their Crimes have undoubtedly Incurr'd a just Forfeiture of all their several Interests yet that even those who Purchased their Places for Valuable Considerations should be Reimburs'd their Purchase-Money tho' this is a Favour which they can't pretend a Title to and that which perhaps no other Power upon Earth but an English Parliament would Indulge II. That all Mortgages and other Securities and Incumbrances whatsoever which have been made really and bona fide upon Valuable Considerations may be Paid Off and Discharged with Principal and Interest which otherwise would have lain an Eternal Dead Weight on the Offices For to be sure the Marshal and Warden would have kept all Incumbrances still on Foot on purpose to Secure the Profits thereof from being touch'd So that until these Obstacles are Remov'd all Endeavours for an Effectual Relief must be Vain Fruitless and Insignificant And I am inform'd That the whole Charge that will be requisite upon this Occasion will not Amount to above Thirty or Forty Thousand Pounds a small Recompence for a National Benefit no more than some single Regiments of the Army are to have before they are Disbanded III. The Stage being Clear of these Vermin like Snails let 'em carry their Houses and Prisons with 'em for indeed they are not large enough to Contain a Tenth Part of the Prisoners which I take to be a strong Argument against the possibility of the present Prisons answering the Ends of the Law viz. Confinement c. And therefore as to the Foundation of this New Establishment in the first place I Propose the Builing of Two Large and Capacious Prisons which may be contrived to Contain Three or Four Thousand Men apiece and in each of these New Prisons a Work-House to be set apart which cannot but turn to a very good Account for not only our Manufactures might be thereby Improved by so great a Number of Hands but also abundance of Miserable Wretches who are in a starving Condition and forc'd to Beg thro' a Grate would find a Comfortable Subsistence And besides there would be this particular Advantage to the whole Nation That whereas now by the 43 Eliz. c. 2. the Justices of the Peace of every County and Corporation in England are yearly to Rate every Parish towards the Relief of the Poor Prisoners of the King's-Bench all this constant Charge and Expence which has been paid already for near a Hundred Years will be taken off which otherwise might continue upon us as a Rent-Charge to the End of the World so that the Nation will Discharge a Debt by this Means Indeed I have often wondred that there have been no Provisions hitherto made for the Setting poor Prisoners for Debt at Work and why they should be looked on as Useless and Rotten Members of the Common Wealth any more than poor Prisoners Committed to Gaol for Felony and other Misdemeanors for whom by the 19 Car. II. c. 4. the Justices of the Peace at their General Sessions are to Provide a Stock of such Materials as they think convenient and sit Persons to Oversee and Set them to Work Now for the Charge of these New Buildings it may be so Managed as not to cost the Nation a Farthing for I do not question but there are Five Hundred Persons in this Town who would gladly Undertake the Building of these Prisons on the Terms of being Reimbursed by part of the Profits which may Arise within the Walls either by Chamber-Rent or from the Prisoners Work or other Methods as shall be thought fit by Parliament IV. And in Order to Reduce the Number of the King's-Bench and Fleet Prisoners by preventing the Removal of Prisoners from the Countrey Prisons That no Habeas Corpus may be Allow'd unless it be upon some Affidavit made of the Fact by which it may appear to the Court or the Judge what the Nature of the Cause is for which he was Committed and if it appears to have been upon any Mesne Process or Execution for Debt Damages or Costs c. that either the Habeas Corpus may be Denied or if the Matter be doubtful by reason of Cross Affidavits that the Prisoners may be brought up and after Examination be Remanded as is usual in Criminal Cases And I can't see what Occasion there is of this Habeas Corpus when the Prisoner may be as well Charged by a Copy of the Declaration delivered to