Selected quad for the lemma: law_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
law_n commit_v sin_n transgression_n 6,297 5 10.9290 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A81247 The morning exercise methodized; or Certain chief heads and points of the Christian religion opened and improved in divers sermons, by several ministers of the City of London, in the monthly course of the morning exercise at Giles in the Fields. May 1659. Case, Thomas, 1598-1682. 1659 (1659) Wing C835; Thomason E1008_1; ESTC R207936 572,112 737

There are 12 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

no lesse concerned in the second than the first Table of the Law If David sin against Bathsheba her chastity or Vriah his life yet he must confesse unto God Against the have I sinned and wrought this wickednesse in thy sight however the trespasse is against man the transgression is against God the sin which is committed against God is to be only confessed unto God not unto man but the sin which is committed against man must be confessed unto God and likewise unto men to God alwayes who can pardon the eternal punishment to men ordinarily as when the Church is scandalized or the particular person is offended and damnified James 5.16 and in this last case restitution must be added to our confession Luke 19. Zacheus like where we have wronged any we must make acknowledgement and reparation and in all offences to men when we come before God we must consider whether our brother hath ought against us Mat. 5.24 and go and be reconciled the God that binds men to forgive till seventy times seven times binds the offendor so often to return and say I have offended Luke 17.4 The auricular confession of the Papists is vanity superstition and evil but particular acknowledgements of sin to God and sometimes to men is duty indispensable in vain doth Saul say to Samuel I have sinned whilst he never seeks to God for the pardon 3. Confession of sin and prayer for pardon must be free and not extorted The natural not forced language of the penitent the confession of constraint falleth equally under suspicion with the unrequired accusations of malice both which are frequently false true repentance doth convince of the sinfulnesse of sin and constraine the soule to confesse it with candor ingenuity and freedome as weary of it as the stomach of nauseous matter that it naturally without any co-action casts up Confession springs from the Saints as Elihu his plea for God against Job I am full of matter the Spirit of the Lord constraineth me saith he to Job Job 32.18 19 20. The confession of the wicked is constrained and no longer doth he cry to God than he is under the cudgel of his judgements or on the Rack of his own conscience so Pharaoh his plagues and Judas his anxiety may extort an I have sinned however the children of God must be sometimes pinched and whipped into their complaints yet their cry is natural and confessions free and voluntary a ready eccho to the least reproof Psal 141.5 and desiring that the righteous may smite and God shew them their iniquity 4. Confession and supplication must not be more free than full not straitned any more than extorted sin must be confest not only in general and in the lump with a Lord have mercy upon us miserable sinners but in its particular species and parts as Israel We have forsaken the Lord and served Baal in Judg. 10.10 and we have to all our sins added this evil to ask us a King to go about to change our Government 1 Sam. 12.19 not only open known hainous and flagitious offences but even secret and particular lusts David bewails and confesseth not only his murther executed on Uriah but his self-revenge intended against Nabal and the very cutting off the lap of Sauls garment not only sin simply in it self but with all its aggravations of time place manner occasion sinne must be taken up by the roots and spread before God in all its branches In iniquity was I conceived in sin brought forth as well as against thee have I sinned In vaine doth Caine confesse his cruelty to A●el and conceale his irreligion to God or Judas complaine of betraying innocent bl●od whilst he makes no mention of his covetousnesse 5. Shame and sorrow must seize on the confessing suppliant for sinnes pardon Contrition of heart and confusion of face must be the result of confession dayes of atonement Lev. 23.27 28. were dayes of soul-affliction because of confession of sin Davids complaints makes him water his couch and mingle his bred with teares lying in the dust and renting of Garments were required from such as came to confesse iniquity the spirit of repentance is a spirit of mourning 6. Confession must be made with confidence and supplication in hope of pardon the true penitent is prostrate before God as a Father not as a Judge men may confesse and be hanged but the children of God cry with Shecaniah We have transgressed but yet there is hope in Israel concerning this thing Ezra 10.2 they pray in faith Father forgive us our trespasses not in feare mercy my Lord mercy Judas's confession was therefore false because fearful and flying to his own destruction not the innocent blood by him betrayed that he might have been saved we have shewed you the subject of repentance must be the believing sinner hopes of mercy puts halters on our necks confidence of pardon seats us in Gods Chair to condemne our selves the confessions of despair are the outcries of the damned in hell Thus then Beloved I have laid before you the true nature of true repentance I well know it is a common Theme and much Treated of but little practiced nay indeed little considered and understood How many pretenders are there among us that may yet ponder the nature of Gospel-repentance which if it be well understood will neither appeare to be so lightly come by nor sleightly performed as it is deemed we must know that every common repentance will not serve our turn unto the Remission of sin but that repentance which Christ gives is in respect of nature 1. A grace supernatural without the reach of mans arme or acquirement 2. Whereby the believing sinner apprehensive of his own guilt and Gods grace in and through Jesus Christ 3. Sensibly affected with and afflicted for his sin as committed against God under conviction and contrition for all his sin as sin 4. Doth return from sin all sin unto God and God only as his all in all 5. Freely confessing and frequently begging pardon for his iniquity Consider my Brethren this description of Repentance you have had unfolded and the nature of the grace discovered for it will be very useful to you as a touchstone of doctrine and practice for the confutation of all false notions about Repentance as that 1. Repentance is the result of nature and at mans command we may repent when we will as the Arminians teach but you must remember its supernatural 2. That pennance is a transient act of confession and self-castigation as the Papists teach you must know it is a grace or habit 3. That repentance is before faith and not the result of the Gospel and effect of the blood of Christ as some Divines suggest 4. That c●nviction contrition and confession are not necessary to repentance as the Antinomians teach or sufficient repentance as the Legalist and Pharisee teach that a turning from sin to sin or at least not to God and
in his creation with a perfect and universal rectitude 2. That mans defection from his primitive state was purely voluntary and from the unconstrained choice of his own mutable and self-determining will Though the latter part of the Text would afford a sufficient ground to treat of the state of man now fallen yet that being by agreement left to another hand I observe no more from it then what concerns the manner of his fall and that only as it depended on a mutable will In handling these truths I shall 1. Open them in certain explicatory Theses 2. Improve them in some few praictcal and applicatory inferences 1. About the former that God endued c. take these Propositions for explication Prop. 1 1. All created rectitude consists in conformity to some rule or Law Rectitude is a meer relative thing and its relation is to a rule By a rule I here mean a law strictly taken and therefore I speak this only of created rectitude A law is a rule of duty given by a Superiour to an Inferiour nothing can be in that sense a rule to God or the measure of increated rectitude Prop. 2 2. The highest rule of all created rectitude is the will of God considered as including most intrinsecally an eternal and immutable reason justice and goodness 'T is certain there can be no higher rule to creatures than the divine Will Rom. 7.12 Rom. 12.102 Ezek. 18.25 ch 33. and as certain that the government of God over his creatures is alwayes reasonable and just and gracious and that this reasonablenesse justice and goodnesse by which it is so should be subjected any where but in God himself none that know what God is according to our more obvious notions of him can possibly think Prop. 3 3. Any sufficient signification of this Will touching the reasonable creatures duty is a law indispensably obliging such a creature A law is a constitution de debito and 't is the Legislatours will not concealed in his own breast but duly expressed that makes this constitution and infers an obligation on the Subject Prop. 4 4. The Law given to Adam at his creation was partly natural given by way of internal impression upon his soul partly positive given as is probable by some more external discovery or revelation That the main body of laws whereby man was to be governed should be at first given no other way than by stamping them upon his mind and heart was a thing congruous enough to his innocent state as it is to Angels and Saints in glory it being then exactly contempered to his nature highly approvable to his reason as is evident in that being faln his reason ceases not to approve it Rom. 2.18 fully sutable to the inclination and tendency of his will and not at all regretted by any reluctant principle that might in the least oppose or render him doubtful about his duty Yet was it most reasonable also that some positive commands should be superadded that Gods right of dominion and government over him as Creatour might be more expresly asserted and he might more fully apprehend his own obligation as a creature to do somethings because it was his Makers Will as well as others because they appeared to him in their own nature reasonable and fit to be done for so the whole of what God requires of man is fitly distinguished into some things which he commands because they are just and some things that are just because he commands them Prop. 5 5. Adam was indued in his creation with a sufficient ability and habitude to conform to this whole Law both natural and positive in which ability and habitude his original rectitude did consist This Proposition carries in it the main truth we have now in hand therefore requires to be more distinctly insisted on There are two things in it to be considered The thing it self he was endued with The manner of the endowment 1. The thing it self wherewith he was endued that was uprightnesse rectitude otherwise called the image of God though that expression comprehends more than we now speak of as his immortality dominion over the inferiour creatures c. which uprightness or rectitude consisted in the habitual conformity or conformability of all his natural powers to this whole Law of God and is therefore considerable two wayes viz. In relation to its Subject Rule 1. In relation to its subject that was the whole soul in some sense it may be said the whole man even the several powers of it And here we are led to consider the parts of this rectitude for 't is coextended if that phrase may be allowed with its subject and lies spread out into the several powers of the soul for had any power been left destitute of it such is the frame of man and the dependance of his natural powers on each other in order to action that it had disabled him to obey and had destroyed his rectitude for bonum non oritur nisi ex causis integris malum vero ex quovis defectu Davenant de justitia habituali i. And hence as Davenant well observes according to the parts if I may so speak of the subject wherein it was Mans original rectitude must be understood to consist of 1. A perfect illumination of mind to understand and know the Will of God 2. A compliance of heart and will therewith 3. An obedient subordination of the sensitive appetite and other inferiour powers that in nothing they might resist the former That it comprehends all these appears by comparing Col. 3.10 where the image of God wherein man was created is said to consist in knowledge that hath its seat and subject in the mind with Ephes 4.24 where righteousness and holiness are also mentioned the one whereof consists in equity towards men the other in loyalty and devotedness to God both which necessarily suppose the due framing of the other powers of the soul to the ducture of an inlightened mind And besides that work of sanctification which in these Scriptures is expresly called a renovation of man according to the image of God wherein he was created doth in other Scriptures appear as the forementioned Authour also observes to consist of parts proportionable to these I mention viz. illumination of mind Ephes 1.18 conversion of heart Psal 51.10 victory over concupiscence Rom. 6.7 throughout 2. Consider this rectitude in relation to its Rule that is the Will of God revealed 1 John 3.4 or the Law of God sin is the transgression of the Law and accordingly righteousnesse must needs be conformity to the Law viz. actual righteousnesse consists in actual conformity to the Law that habitual rectitude which Adam was furnished with in his Creation of which we are speaking in an habitual conformity or an ability to conform to the same Law This habitual conformity was as of the whole soul so to the whole Law i. e. to both the parts or kinds of it natural and positive
when sin hath been committed and the raging of the affections are a little appeased then the minde returns unto its self and the Spirit that was resisted brings to remembrance those grievous and unavoidabl● threanings which the Law denounceth whereupon there follows 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Legal repentance that is a wishing that the Fact were undone and that he had not committed the sin that causeth that trouble but not that he is any better than before for shew him a new temptation and he presently runs after it though under trouble of minde and though expectation of wrath incredibly full of anguish doth sting and vex him intolerably But now Beloved where this ends well there the Spirit insinuates something to put him upon panting after a Redeemer and to get power against sin and this brings unspeakable joy and begets peace past all understanding thus you see the best effects of the Law is the bringing men to the Gospel which shews the fifth excellency of the Gospel-Covenant 6. The Gospel-Covenant is the better Covenant in respect of its objects or persons taken into Covenant and that under a double consideration their multiplicity and their quality 1. In respect of the number The Old Covenant belonged only to one people the New to Jews and Gentiles Abraham and his posterity were taken into Covenant and all the world beside were excluded those few others that were admitted it was by extraordinary grace and they were as it were planted into Abrahams family but now the partition Wall is broken down which as it were shut up the mercy of God in the confines of Israel Now peace is proclaimed to those that are far off as well as to those that are near that they might become one people this is a great mystery Colos 1.26 Certainly all may well say so as we are poor Gentiles and we are made nigh by the blood of his Crosse Col. 1.20 21. 2. The Gospel-Covenant is better in respect of the quality of the persons taken into it the Law is proposed to wicked secure and hardened sinners 1 Tim. 1.9 The Law is not made for a righteous man but for the lawless and disobedient for ungodly and for sinners for unholy and profane for murderers of fathers and murd●rers of mothers for men-slayers for whoremongers c. to restrain and bridle them but the Gospel lifts up broken-hearted sinners Luk. 4.18 He hath sent me to heale the broken-hearted to preach deliverance to the captives and recovering of sight to the blind to set at liberty them that are bruised to preach the acceptable year of the Lord The Law is to terrifie the conscience the Gospel is to comfort it * Gerhard l. c. 7. The last excellency I shall name is this the Gospel-Covenant is every way faultlesse it is the last and best Dispensation of Divine grace Hebr. 8.7 If the first Covenant had been faultlesse then should no place have been sought for the second as if he should say the Covenant from Mount Sinai was not such Quo non alterum posset esse perfectius * Grotius that man could not desire a better Hebr. 7.18 19. There is verily a disanulling of the Commandment going before for the weaknesse and unprofitableness thereof for the Law made nothing perfect but the bringing in of a better hope did by the which we draw nigh unto God plainly this is so excellent we cannot desire a better The Old Covenant is abrogated 1. As to the circumstance de futuro it all related to the future Messiah Christ is come and that consideration therefore ceaseth 2. 'T is abrogated as to the impossible condition of perfect obedience the Gospel sincerity of the meanest believer is better than the exactest obedience of the highest Legalist 3. 'T is abrogated as to the burden of Legal Ceremonies Priesthood and shadows God gave these things to them and the Gospel to us as we give nuces parvulo codicem grandi * Beda things of smaller value to a little childe but a good book to him when he is grown up They have lost their Temple their Priesthood their Unction 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 * Chrysost c. We have Heaven for our Temple and Christ for our Priest and the Spirit for our Unction 4. The Old Covenant is abrogated as to the yoke of Mosaical policy we have nothing to do with the Judicial Laws of the Jews any farther than they are Moral or of a Moral equity Luk. 16.16 The Law and the Prophets were untill John Hebr. 7.12 The Priesthood being changed there is made of necessity a change of the Law And thus I have doctrinally shewed you the excellency of the Gospel-Covenant APPLICATION 1. This retorts wicked mens Reproaches into their own faces They cry out against the Ministers of the Gospel for preaching terrour to them Be it known to you the Gospel is properly employed in celebrating the mercy of God in the pardon of sin and comforting drooping sinners but in your doing what you can to put out this comfortable light you force us to fetch fire from Mount Sinai to take hold of you 'T is true the Law was given with Thunder and Lightning and terrible Miracles the Gospel was attested with a comfortable voice from heaven and healing Miracles but as sinners broken by the Law needed some Gospel-balm to heal their wounds so secure Gospel sinners need Legal threatnings to fright them out of their sluggishnesse and sleepy security If whispers of peace will not awaken them we must cry aloud to stir them up if it be possible to break off sinning and to minde salvation Sirs 't is no pleasure to us to speak words unpleasing to you you hinder us from work more purely Evangelical and which 't is a thousand fold more pleasure to us to be conversant about 'Pray take notice that were it not in love and faithfulnesse to your souls we would never be so poorly employed as to be pelting at your base lusts Do but try us Break off your soul-undoing wickednesse and you shall never hear us rate you any more you your selves being Judges ex gr Ask a sober man whether the lashing of drunkennesse makes him smart or not Ask a chaste person whether the naming of such Texts as Prov. 22.14 The mouth of strange women is a deep pit he that is abhorred of the Lord shall fall therein Prov. 23.27 An whore is a deep ditch and a strange woman is a narrow pit reproach him in short Ask one that 's conscientious whether he thinks the Minister hath a spite at him in his Sermon because he names 1 Cor. 6.9 10. Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the Kingdome of God Be not deceived neither Fornicators nor Idolaters nor Adulterers nor Effeminate nor Abusers of themselves with mankinds nor Thieves nor Covetous nor Drunkards nor Revilers nor Extortioners shall inherit the Kingdome of God Alas all these will tell
under the obediential observance and poysonous malediction of that Law upon which there was only the print of his own authoririty for though the humane nature abstractly considered is as a creature bound to the observance of a Law yet being in conjunction with the second person in the Trinity and assumed into the personality of the Son of God it was exempted from obedience and indemnified as to curse and penalty Christ submitted to the Ceremonial Law in his circumcision put his neck under the yoke of the moral Law to fulfill the preceptive part by his Perfect obedience and satisfie the maledictive part by his compleat sufferings all which subjection was not a debt that God could have challenged of him but a pure voluntary subscription The Law is not made in some sense for a righteous man 1. Tim. 1.9 but it is not made in any sense for the glorious God 3. And which is a step beneath both these he appeared as a sinful man or in the likeness of sinful flesh Rom. 8.3 subjection to the Law made him very low but the similitude of sin which is the violation of the Law was a far greater abasement Christs appearing in the likenesse of sinful flesh must not be understood as though his flesh were only a likenesse and appearance Non in similitudine carnis quasi caro non esset caro sed in similitudine carnis peccati quia caro erat sed peccati caro non erat Aug. Heb. 9. ult or he had only an aerial and phantastical body as some of old absurdly fancied and affirmed he had true real flesh though but the similitude and resemblance of sinful flesh the word likenesse relates not to flesh but sin not flesh in likeness but sin in likeness a being under a Law implies nothing of sin it was the case of Adam and the Angels and both without sin or any thing that look't like sin but our blessed Lord condescended not only to subjection but to the print and appearances of transgression He shall appear saith the Apostle the second time without sin unto salvation Intimating that the first time he appeared with sin upon him when he returns in glory he shall have no dints of sin upon him the smell or fingeing of it shall not be upon his garments but his first entrance was with many of those prints and marks that sin where ever it is uses to leave behinde it Sin was neither inherent in him nor committed by him but imputed to him Sin never defiled him but it defaced him he had nothing of its impurity but much of its penalty he was not tainted with that plague but he was pleased to take upon him the tokens In the same Chapter the Prophet tells us He had done no violence neither was any deceit in his mouth and he was numbred with Transgressors Isa 53.9 12. He trode not one step awry in sin but many of the footsteps of sin appeared upon him to instance in a few 1. Poverty he came in a low and mean condition and that 's the very likenesse of sin the great bankrupt that brought all to beggery Though he was rich yet for our sakes he b came poor 2 Cor. 8.9 When he rode to Jerusalem it was not in state in a gilded Coach with six horses or mounted like a Lord Mayor with embossed trappings but as one might rather say like a Beggar that is sent with a Passe from one Town to another Matth. 21.5 Sitting upon an Asse Matth. 8.20 and a Colt the foole of an Asse The Foxes have holes and the Birds of the Aire have nests but the Son of man had not where to lay his head He was at such a very low ebb as to worldly riches Matth. 17. ult 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 valet 2 s. 6 d. that once he and one of his Apostles could not both of them make a purse for half a crown to pay their tax without the working of a Miracle Isa 55.3 2 Thess 2.3 2. Another likenesse of sin was sorrow He was a man of sorrows and acquainted with griefs as Antichrist is called a man of sin his very make and constitution is sin so was Christ a man of sorrows and as it were made up of them they were in a manner his complexion We read oft of his weeping but it is not observed that ever there was a smile upon his face Now sin and sorrow are so near of kin that the Hebrew language compriseth both in one word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 they are as like as mother and daughter and both called by the same name 3. A third likenesse of sin was shame and reproach Sin was the inlet of shame when our first Parents had sinned their eyes were opened Gen. 3.7 Chap. 2. ult and they knew that they were naked and sewed fig-leaves toge her Why they were naked before and were not ignorant of it but then it was no shame to them sin gave them a sight of their nakednesse so as they never saw it before This similitude of sin was upon Christ when he was called Glutton Wine-bibber Conjurer Blasphemer Divel and what not that might cause and increase contempt We hid as it were our faces from him saith the Prophet he was despised and we esteemed him not Isa 55.3 how vile and contemptible is that person upon whom we turn the back in scorn to whom we will not vouchsafe so much as a look or the glance of an eye I am a reproach of men saith the Psalmist in the person of Christ and desp sed of the people Psal 22.6 4. Another similitude of sin was the withdrawment of his Father and clouding the li●h● of his counte●ance His fathers forsaking him whereof he makes that heavy heart-breaking complaint Matth 27.46 My God my God why hast thou for●aken me The frown of his Father and brow-beating of his displeasure was the very likenesse of sin for from that noysome vapour o●ly arises a cloud to over-cast the light of his countena ce Nothing but that builds up a partition wall betwixt him and us Your iniquities have separated betwixt you and your God and your sins have hid his face from you We hid our face from Christ Isa 59 2. and in that there was reproach but alas this was nothing in comparison a Prince need not trouble himself that he hath not the smile of his Groom What if all creatures in heaven and earth had hid their faces from Christ he could well have born up under it but the hiding of his Fathers face even broke his heart as a burden intolerable 5. And lastly Christ submitted to death and that 's ano●her likenesse of sin Sin entred into the world and death by sin Rom. 5.12 they came together as it were hand in hand this was ●he penalty inflicted upon sin In the day thou e●test thou shalt su●ely dye Gen. 2.17 Now in this
the root there needs no more than a right understanding of the true and proper notion and manner of Christs redeeming us it is not by way of Solution but of Satisfaction Clearly thus our case to God is not properly that of debtors but that of criminal Subjects Gods aspect to usward not properly that of a Creditor but that of a Rector and Judge The person Christ sustained and the part he acted not in a strict sense that of a Surety paying the very debt in kind and so discharging a bond but that of a Mediator expiating our guilt and making reparations to Divine Justice another way than by the execution of the Law And indeed the very nature of a Law is such as it is quite impossible that the obligation either of its threatning or command should in a proper sense be fulfilled by any other than the very person threatned and commanded alius here makes aliud If another suffer the penalty the threatning is not fulfilled Nor if another performs the duty the command for the obligation as to punishment lies on the person threatned noxa caput sequitur and that to duty on the person commanded it cannot be fulfilled in kind by another but it ceases to be the same thing and becomes another th●ng from that in the Obligation yet it may be such another thing and Christs Righteousnesse both active and passive really is such as the Rector or Judge may accept of with honour and be satisfied with as if the very same thing had been suffered and done just in the same manner as the Law threatned and commanded it That Christ hath paid not the idem but tantundem i. e. not fulfilled the Law as for us in kind but satisfied it for us is most evident For 1. The Law obliged the sinners person to suffer Christ was no sinner 2. All men to suffer forasmuch as all had sinned Christ was but one man 3. The punishment due by Law was eternal Christ suffered but for a season and is entered into his glory thus Christ paid not the same thing that was in the Obligation but something equivalent thereunto This being obtain'd that the Lord Christ hath Redeemed us not by way of solution or discharging a Bond by payment in kind but by way of satisfaction or making amends to the injur'd justice of the Law It follows from the reason nature of the thing 1. That God pardons freely we are not only beholding to Christ for satisfying but to God too infinitely for accepting of any satisfaction at all he might have refused it he had done sinners no wrong if he had executed the rigour of the Law without hearkening to termes of Reconciliation Quite contrary a Creditor doth not pardon the debtor when the surety hath discharged the Bond by full payment in kinde the Debtor is beholding indeed to his friend the Surety but not at all to the Creditor who cannot refuse to cancel the Bond nay it were wrong and injustice in him if he did 2. That none hath or can have actual interest in or benefit by this Redemption but upon such termes as God and Christ have mutually compromised in and agreed to viz. the conditions of the Gospel-Covenant above mentioned See the answer to the third quere 1. The Reason hereof is partly from God the injur'd Law-giver of the world who seeing it was at his liberty to accept of satisfaction or no hath of necessity the right to make his own termes when and how far forth and in what manner and method he will condescend to admit the sinner to the actual benefit of Christs satisfaction 2. And partly too from Christ for as he is the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Mediator between God and man a friend to both parties nay a person consisting of both natures the offended and offending he is engaged necessarily by vertue both of Office and person to espouse with equal tendernesse of regard he interests of both parties for he is really concerned in them both they are his concernments as well as theirs True indeed a Surety that dischargeth a Bond by full payment in kinde he sustaines and beares only the person of the Debtor minds only his indemnity doth what he doth upon his account and for his sake But our great Mediator must consult not only our impunity but his Fathers yea and his own honour and therefore 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 get you hence all you that either yet never did or that do not now repent believe and conscientiously endeavour to obey here 's not the least jot of benefit for you in the case you are in from this Redemption for how infinite soever the merit of Christs satisfaction is it conferreth nothing actually upon any person that hath not actually a Gospel-claime and title to plead it before God The immediate effect actually resulting from Christs performance is the procuring the Gospel-Covenant to be ratified by his Father as a Law whereby sinners upon the termes propounded become reconcilable unto God actually it is of force to all that have but to none that want the conditions of it Now the keeping this Gospel-Covenant God expects from us in person though by the assistance of his Spirit which he hath promised to give to them that humbly and earnestly ask it of him Luke 11.1 To affirme that Christ hath kept the Gospel for us too is to utter the most self-contradicting blasphemy and absurdity imaginable as if he could repent or believe in himself free except or cancel our Obligation to obey the Moral Law by his own obeying it as if Christ had so done all that nothing remaines to be done on our part Such strange extreames do some men run into that to avoid Justification by works by an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are as extravagant on the other hand thinking the grace of God cannot be free except the sinner become either a senselesse statue meerly passive or which is yet worse have a Writ of ease to be quite idle or wich is worst of all a Licence to sin by Prerogative Let the Apostles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 chastise this insolence Rom. 6.15 Shall we sin because we are not under the Law but under grace God forbid If Christ had obeyed the Law for us in the sense of paying a debt or discharging a Bond the Apostles answer could not stand Rom. 3.31 Do we then make void the Law through faith yea we establish the Law When a believer breaks the Law he sins for sinne is the transgression of the Law nay he cannot break it wilfully but he breaks the very Gospel-Covenant one condition whereof is sincere obedience and the guilt of that sin lieth upon him unpardoned untill by hearty repentance and fresh applications by faith to the blood of sprinkling which are the only Titles good in Law the only Gospel-claimes to pardon he hath sued out a new pardon for actual Remission is only of past sins Rom. 3.25 according to the tenor of
requir●ng sometimes the one sometimes the other when Repentance is the duty to be discharged calling sometimes for fasting weeping and walking in sackcloth and ashes nay the rending of the heart and not the garmen●s Joel 2.11 12. and sometimes and that very commonly for turning to the Lord nay the whole work of Repentance is in Scripture expressed by Humiliation in the promise of pardon to the penitent their Repentance is described to be an humbling of the uncircumcised heart and acceptance of the punishment of their sin Lev. 26.41 So when Rehoboam and Manasseh Repented they are only said to humble themselves 2 Chron. 12.6 33.2 And under the Gospel we read of Repentance for sin as well as from sin and 't is denominated godly sorrow which worketh Repentance 2 Cor. 7.10 Working not only as a cause but complement perfecting finishing and compleating Repentance and therefore the Apostle James requires them that draw nigh to God and clean their h art and purifie their hands that they be afflicted mourn and weep and humble themselves under the hand of God James 2.8 9 10. And the Covenant of Grace promising Repentance doth expresse it self by these two acts you shall see the evil of yo r wayes and loa h y●ur selves because of your iniquities and ab●minations And I w●ll put my Spirit within you and cause you to walk in my ways Ezek. 36.27 31. So that according to the expressions of Scripture as well as the experiences of the Saints Humi●iation of the s●ul is an essential act and eminent part of Repentance and this is that which I in the description do denominate sense of and sorrow for sin as committed against God thereby intending to note unto you that the soul must be humbled that will be lifted up by the Lord and his humiliation doth and must consist of these two parts Conviction and Contrition sight of and sorrow for sin The first part of humiliation is A Spirit of Conviction First part of humiliation or sight of sin in every penitent soul which is no other than the operation of the Holy Ghost opening the blinde eye to see the deviations of the soul and the destruction inevitably attending the persistance in it this act of Repentance and Humiliation is no other but the Prodigals return to himself in sense of his own starving condition whil'st his fathers servants have bread enough Luke 15.17 Rom. 7.9 the arrival of the Law unto the reviving of sin in Pauls sense and feeling the communing with our hearts that we may tremble Psal 4.5 and not sin a searching and trying our ways that we may return unto the Lord a smiting on the thigh with a What have we done Lam. 3.39 the smiting of Davids heart 2 Sam 24.10 with an I have sinned against the Lord the judging of our selves that we may not be judged of the Lord the Spirit of bondage which goeth before the Spirit of Adoption In a word it is the souls serious erection of a Court in its own breast and setting conscience in the Throne and making a judicial processe to descry and determine its eternal condition in order to which 1. It spreads before it self the Law of God as that wh●ch must be the Rule of life and reason of death and condemnation the will of God dictating duty and disswading iniquity awarding recompence according to obedience or disobedience In a word determining of men Thus do and live or thus do and dye thus I will be worshipped and you shall be rewarded in this if you transgresse you shall be thus punished the soul seeth clearly that the Law is in nature and necessity a Schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ whil'st by serious consideration of its genuine sense and due extent the soul standeth convinced this is du y enjoyned this is sin inhibited herein if I offend not only in deed and word but thought or imagination I am a Transgressor bound under guilt and the expectation of judgment thus the coming of the Law into Pauls minde becomes the revival of sin and Josiah his reading in the Law of Moses led him to the tremblings of heart and renting his garment before the Lord 2 Chron. 34.18 19. For as indeed wi●hout the Law there is no transgression so without the knowledge of the Law there can be no conviction ignorance of Divine pleasure is the great obstruction of Repentance and therefore the Prince of this world doth daily endeavour to blow out the light of the Word or to blinde the eyes of the sons of men that they may not see and be converted but God sends his Prophets rising up early and sending them to read the Law in the ears of men that Israel may see his sinne and Judah her transgression The first act of Repentance is the falling of the scales from off the sinners eyes the first language of a turning soul is Lord what wouldest thou have me to do So that the soul humbling self-examinant seeing the Law to be holy just and good that which must be the rule and reason of its condition it being to arraign and condemn it self becomes studious of the Law in its full sense and due extent in commands prohibitions promises and threats and sets before its eye every particular precept and pondereth the righteousnesse of that God who hath declared a curse against every one that continueth not in the Law to do it and so by the justification of and insight to the Law of God exciteth the soul to self-reflexion and is constrained to cry out What have I done whereupon it 2. Surveigheth the past course of his own life summoneth together all faculties powers and members of both soul and body to make rehearsal of his past conversation in word thought and deed and to give an exact account of their conformity or disagreement with the Law of God established and rule by which it must be judged and now he communeth with his hear● considereth his ways examineth him ●l● makes an exact comparison of his life with Gods Law layeth the li●e close to h s carriage and so convinceth himself of his deviations and ●rregularities insomuch that sin reviveth and he dyeth guilt appeareth and grief and shame aboundeth his own heart condemns him as disobedient and a Transgressor of the Law that he is constrained to c●y out What I sh●uld do I have not done and I have left undone what I ought to have done Rom. 7.19 I have sinned against the Lord if God be severe to mark what is amisse I cannot abide in his presence for I have not only offended in part of his holy Law and broken the least of his Commandments but I have violated the whole Law and am a Transgressor against every Command nay he cometh on this consideration to be convinced of his anomy and ataxy the pravity of his nature that enmity to the Law which is implanted in his very being and that irregularity whereby
sinned before the Lord 2 Sam. 12.13 Returning Israel must take with them words and say Receive us graciously take away all iniquity Ashur shall not save us we will not ride upon Horses neither will we say any more to the work of our hands ye are our gods Hos 14.3 When the Prodigal comes to himself he goe●h to his father and cryeth I have sinned against heaven and against thee I am no more worthy to be counted thy son make me as one of thy hired servants Luk. 15.21 Confession of and prayer for sins pardon are such inseparable concomitants of Repentance that the whole work of Repentance is expressed by them as if they were the formality thereof thus when Repentance is the result of Gods chastisements God observes if they shall confesse their iniquity and the iniquity of their Fathers their trespasse whereby they have trespassed against me and that they have walked contrary unto me then will I be merciful Levit. 26.40 When Achan is called to Repentance he is required to give glory to God and confesse his iniquity Josh 7.18 and so Israel is required only to acknowledge her iniquity that she hath transgressed against the Lord her God and hath scattered her wayes to the strangers c. Nay the very promise of pardon to the penitent is entailed on an humble suppliant confession of sin if we confesse our iniquity he is merciful and gracious ready to forgive us our sins 1 Joh. 1.8 So that there is no coming to God but with confession of sin and prayer for its pardon and indeed there is great reason that these should accompany true Repentanee because confession and supplication are First The vent of grief they give ease and quiet to the penitent perplexed soul conviction concealed is like a burning bile in which the ill humours in a mans body do rancour and swell burn and pain the whole body as willing to be gone and only giveth ease by being lanced open'd and let out by confession and supplication guilt concealed is like the winde confined in the bowels of the earth making roaring ruptures and dreadful earthquakes unconfest sin is the spring of horror and principle of all amazement David found it so on his sad experience Psal 32.3 When I kept silence my bones waxed old through my roaring all the day long but I acknowledge mine iniquity untill then he could find no comfort Secondly The vomit of sin so Origen did usually call confession for it is the loathsome rejection of sin an easing of the soul by evacuation of what burdened it casting up with grief and pain what we cast off with detestation confession is the emptying the soul of sin by expression of all passion against it self accusation and condemnation turn the heart and whole man against sin shame makes us shun evil the penitents in the Primitive times did confesse their iniquities to God in the sight of the Church and if they again relapsed into the same sin and apostatized to their old course were said to return with the Dog to his vomit and the Sow to her wallowing in the mire 2 Pet. 2.22 Thirdly The vindication of Gods justice in all the afflictions by him inflicted David acknowledgeth and cryeth out Against thee thee onely have I sinned and done this evil in thy sight that thou mayst be justified when thou speakest and clear when thou judgest Psal 51.3 and therefore confession is said to be a giving glory to God Josh 7.19 Jerem. 13.16 Lam. 3.39 It quells all quarrelling passions against God Why should a living man complain a man for the punishment of his sinne The language of a confessing penitent is Thou hast punished us lesse then our Iniqui ies do deserve Ezra 9.13 And to us belong Confusion of face but to the Lord belongeth Righteousnesse Daniel 9. 〈…〉 Fourthly The voice in which God is well-pleased God loves to see his people with ropes about their necks Only acknowledge thine iniqu●ty is Gods demand this soon meeteth with acceptance I have sinned is no sooner spoken by David 2 Sam. 12.13 but the Lord also hath taken away thine iniquity is replied by the Prophet nay Psal 32.5 David can witnesse I but said I will confess and thou forgavest mine iniquity God will nor stay his correcting hand untill the stubborn heart acknowledge his iniquity but then he will do it Levit. 26. the compassions of God give an affectionate check to the sharpest corrections of his children if but moved by their confession and complaint Ephraim cannot sooner relent under Gods hand than he repent of his anger I heard Ephraim bemoaning himself saying I was as a Bullock unaccustomed to the yoke I was ashamed I was confounded turn me and I shall be turned moves Gods very bowels to pity Is not Ephraim my dear son Is he not a pleasant childe I will surely have mercy upon him Jer. 31.18 19 20. We see then that there is much reason why the Gospel-penitent must be a confessing suppliant but before I passe this Conclusion let me briefly propound unto you the Rules which must guide our Confession evidencing and accompanying our Repentance and they are these 1. Confession must spring from Conviction and spread it self unto Condemnation Soul-sense of guilt unto sighing must make the tongue speak of it unto shame compunction of spirit must be expressed by supplication Then shall you remember your own evil wayes and your doings that were not good and shall loath your selves our common Translation reads it But shall judge your selves not worthy to live as other and better Translations read for your iniquities and your abominations is the promise of the Covenant of Grace Ezek. 36.13 Confession of sin wh ch springs not from sensible conviction and spreads not to self-condemnation is an historical narration verbal recitation of sin like the cursory reading of an ordinary Inditement no penitential confession of sin the penitent prodigal begins with I have sinned and ends with I am not worthy it is an easie matter for Saul to say I have sin●ed I have transgressed the Commandment of the Lord but still he staves off the sense of it and not only disputeth against reproof but at length diverts his conviction by an Apology I feared the people and obeyed their voice 1 Sam. 15.24 Conscience is placed in us the Law spread before us and self-scrutiny imposed on us as precursive to our repenting confessions we are required to judge our selves which imports to be convinced we deserve to die and so to put halters on our own necks 2. God alwayes and men ordinarily must be the object of our confessions and supplications Whatever sin is committed God is the object of it his holy Law is violated by it though some sins are committed against God immediately and extend not unto men as all breach of the first Table of the Law and miscarryings of acts of Religion yet all sins against men are also against God who is
altera siniat hujus Horaque erit tantis ultima nulla malis Ovid that it was the comm n opinion among them that the wicked were held in chains by Pluto so they call the Prince of Devils in chaines which cannot be loosed 'T would take up much time and not be so fit for your Christian ears to mention what conceits the Poets have of Tartarus i. e. in plain English Hell and the judgement there wherein for want of Scripture Revelation they are much out in their fictions concerning the manner of this punishment yet these imaginations of theirs give some evidence to the thing it self written in their consciences about which the Word of God doth informe us more fully and clearly Every ones guilty conscience not seared and stifled calls for our assent to this same Doctrine the secret checks in our own bosome do sometime affright and appale us even anticipating torments and giving the sinner an earnest of that summe of misery which is the wages of sin the payment whereof shall never have an end Rom. 6. ult so that every conscious wretch may find and feel such a worm crawling in his own breast which unless it be kill'd by the Physician who only cures sin-stung souls with his own blood will never dye The very Turks speak of the house of perdition Alcoran Mahom c. 14. p. 160. c. 20. p. 198. and affirm that they who have turned Gods grace into impiety shall abide eternally in the fire of hell and there be eternally tormented Thirdly It cannot but be equitable that the wicked who despised everlasting happiness should suffer eternal miseries They would not be heirs of an Everlasting Kingdowe Joh. 5.40 with Isa 9.6 7. and Dan. 7.14 27. and Rev. 14.6 Mat. 2.12 46 18.8 Joh. 5.39 40. with Jude Epist ver 21. Factus est malo dignus aeterno qui hoc in se peremit bonum quo esse posset aeternum August Dan. 12.2 and therefore no marvel they are everlastingly shut out They sleight and refuse Gods eternal mercy and the honour which the Heirs of glory do accept of upon the terms of the Gospel and therefore they must arise to shame and everlasting contempt and undergo eternal misery according to the terms of the Law For Fourthly The violation of those everlasting obligations which lie upon them unto God do demerit an answerable punishment Sit'h the wicked have trampled upon the blood of the Covenant Heb. 10.28 29. and abused the many favours God tendred to them to make them meet for glory by which they have fitted themselves for destruction 't is but reasonable they should be punisht with the mist and blackness of darkness for ever Rom. 9.22 23. 2 Pet. 2.17 Jude ver 13. Rom. 1.18 25. Isa 60.19 Rev. 14.6 Rom. 16.26 who by their prophaness and errours did seek to cloud the beams of Gods infinite goodness Everlasting light and eternal truth To draw to a period Fifthly If wicked impenitents after this life shall not be punisht by God with everlasting torments then something must hinder Either on Gods part or Theirs If on Gods part then 't is either 1. Because he will not Now what his will is you have heard revealed and may know further if you consult the Scripture My Text acquaints you plainly with Christs mind and that 's the mind of God Or 2. Because he cannot which to affirme were to deny his Omnipotency to say he is not God Or 3. Because he dare not what were this but to suppose the Soveraign Judge upon the Bench to be as it were a cowardly Underling to the trembling Prisoner at the Bar when his very breath can kindle the fiery River of brimstone into which he sentenceth every impenitent Malefactor Isa 30.33 Or 4. Because like unjust Judges he may be corrupted with bribes Gen. 18.25 but shall not the Judge of all the World do right If the hindrance be on the wickeds part then I conceive it must be either 1. Because their living and sinning but a short time here on earth does not deserve eternal punishment in Hell for the evil of punishment should be but commensurate to the evil of sin Now there is no proportion betwixt finite and infinite I confesse this pretence is ready to shake the faith of many in this point but if the ground of it be rightly understood it may confirme the point for 1. If the wicked had lived always they would alwayes have separated themselves from God by sinning against him and never have repented of their sin nor been weary of sinning neither then will God be weary of plaguing or repent of punishing The Schoolmen from Augustine argue Pe●cant in aeterno suo ergò puniuntur in ae●erno Dei Aquin. Supl. Scot. in Sent. Thom. 1.2 dae Q. 99. l. ult Q 87. Arts. 5. which will never have an end but remain while God is God This may be illustrated by a similitude as men addicted to pleasure do in the night time eagerly and earnestly pursue their game at Chesse Tables or the like by an inch of candle which unexpectedly goes out would questionlesse have play'd willingly all night had the light lasted So wicked men they desire to spend all their inch of time in the pursuit of their sins if that would continue they would continue in sin and not leave sinning wherefore they shall not leave suffering had they lived for ever here they would have sinned for ever Rev. 9.6 but in Hell where they would not live they must be kept alive because of their will of sin upon Earth Oh! wicked wretch is it not a righteous thing with God what thinkest thou Ad magnam justitiam judicantis pertinet ut nunquam careant supplicio qui in hac vita nunquam voluerunt carere peccato Gregor that thy punishment for thy sin should never cease in Hell who shouldst thou live for ever here thou wouldst be an Eternal standing provocation to his Majesty I deny not but the wicked will sin Eternally in Hell yet I lay not the stresse on that which some do as the reason of their Eternal punishment but because they ●●ven ceased nor would have ceased to transgresse Gods Law Gen. 2.17 Rom. 6. ult 5.12 Gal. 3.9 whiles upon earth and Eternal punishment was denounced against the first transgression which every one that lives and dyes in sin is not only guilty of but will not repent of he would not be reconciled to God here Isa 30.15 Matth. 23.37 John 5.40 Ezek. 33.11 and God will not be reconciled to him hereafter but will say to him always as Tyberius once said to one that requested death rather than long imprisonment Suet. in vita Tyber nondum tecum redii in gratiam I am not yet reconciled to thee that I should shew thee such a favour Prov. 8.36 Deut. 30.19 John 6.40 54. 3.36 Ezra 8.22 Hos 13.9 2. The sinner hath
but his choice and option if he be plagued with Eternal death 't is no other than that which he prefer'd before Eternal life The Lord sets life and death before us as by Moses the typical so by Christ the true Messiah if we will choose Christ and accept of him we may have Eternal life if not we must be sure of Eternal death he that refuseth the Eternal weight of glory in one end of the scale chooseth Eternal punishment in the other end as our first Parents did choose the curse by their voluntary refusing of the blessing which bad choice of theirs laid obnoxious unto Eternal pain both themselves and their posterity who cannot complain of God for inflicting the death they are by corrupt nature liable to sith besides their choice in their first parents and in their own persons they who live under the Gospel have as great a mercy tendred by the second Adam as Eternal death is a grievous punishment yea the Atheist who as 't was said of Antiochus Epiphanes takes more pains to go to Hell Buntings Itinerarie than some others to go to Heaven must confesse that he deserves his wages of Eternal death as his Pay sith he hath toyled and drudged all his life long in the Devils Service only to fit himself for misery 3. The Schoolmen have observed from the Philosopher Aquia Supl. Q. 99. Art 1. that the punishment ought to be levied according to the dignity of him against whom the offence is committed He is more severely punish't who gives his Soveraign a box on the ear than he that does so to his equal Now wicked men and that without Repentance sin against the Eternal God by the violation of his Honourable Law which he resolves to magnisie Isa 42.21 And as they ought not in their own case so they are unqualified to be competent Judges of their Own offences sit'h they cannot see the thousandth part of that evil there is in the least sin and therefore unfit to apportion the punishment which ought to be levied by the Judge of all the World who knows what is meet Gen. 18.25 and will do nothing but what is right proportionable to the offence committed against the supreme Majesty Peccatum in Deum crimen laesae Majestatis Adsit Regula peccatis quae paenas irroget aequas Horatius for where there is satisfaction required there must be proportion which would not at all be here in this case without some kind of infiniteness and because that cannot be found in any meer creature in value it must necessarily be in duration for if after millions of years it could ever be said the damned had fully satisfied Gods justice it might be said they shall be set free as the prisoner from the Goal having paid the debt Luk. 12 58 59 a thing impossible but because the sufferings of the damned which are all the satisfaction they can give infinite justice in regard of the subject being finite Ex parte subjecti and consequently not of nifinite value they must be so in duration at least à parte post as to the future for the defect of satisfaction in the temporal finite punishment of any meer creature Excep If it be excepted Excep neither by the Eternal punishment of men is Gods justice satisfied for then this punishment would not be Eternal Contradictio in Adjecto which is a contradiction in the very thing it self if ever it could be said of Gods justice now 't is satisfied Repl. I Reply 1. Let it be very well considered Repl. whether Gods iustice being infinite and consequently an essential Attribute in God doth not require from man upon his delinquency that satisfaction which is of infinite value Infiniti valoris he the party offended being essentially of infinite dignity Now such a satisfaction i. e. of infinite value could only be made by Christ who being the Surety of the Covenant and suffered in our stead is God-man in one person 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Acts 20.28 and gave plenary satisfaction unto God John 1.14 1 Tim. 3.16 Rom. 3.25 2. Though Eternal punishment may not be called a satisfaction made or given to the party offended yet 't is that which the party offending must ever be in making or giving Parti laesae by the order of the Supreme Judge who is to hear the cause and apportion the punishment to the fault because he the delinquent wanting that infinitenesse in dignity of person which doth bear a proportion to the dignity of the party offended must make this up by an infinite duration of punishment which may perhaps in some sort be termed satisfaction performed to the Law it being the payment of the whole in the obligation Satisfactio legi praestita Peysolutio totius quod est in obligatione for upon defailance of paying the debt of duty and obedience what more is required of the debt of penalty and suffering to be paid Debitum officii Debitumsupp li cii than death in its full latitude temporal spiritual and Eternal so that in this respect 't is no error to call it satisfaction but if we speak of a compleat satisfaction made to the party offended Parti offensae it must be granted that none but the only Son of God did or could give it thus for the first great impediment pretended in regard of the Subject Or 2. It is because there is a possibility of freedom from the Prison of Hell and then this must be either by Covenant and Compact which whoever affirms proferat tabulas for 't is fan y not faith which believeth any such thing without the written Word Or by commutation and what place for such a fancy Is any so absurd as to think there are any in Hell who belong to God and in Heaven who belong to the Divel that there should be matter for such a Chimaera such a strange fiction Or by force and what were this but to over-power Omnipotency Or by fraud and what were this but to out-wit Divine Wisdome and to put a trick upon him whose understanding is infinite Or by a price paid and what is it that offending man can lay down as a sufficient compensation or satisfaction to an offended God who is infinite for the injury done unto him which God should accept of 1 Sam. 2.25 Godw. Rom. Antiq. l. 1. Sect. 2. ●● Ephes 5.6 is hard to fancy and woful experience if nothing else will may convince vain man that 't is impossible to procure Or by manumission now this doth belong only to obedient servants not to ch●ldren of disobedience Or 3. The impediment is because there is an impossibility in regard of the subject as is pretended of undergoing torments of an eternal duration by a finite creature Ex parte subjecti and therefore all the Hell Socinians c. grant Socinus Racov. Cat. Crellius Bidle Richardson c.
between the parts Thus Abraham entred into Covenant with God and he took a Heifer Shee Goat Gen. 15. Ver. 9.10 and a Ramme and divided them in the midst and laid one piece against another Ver. 9.10 And behold a burning Lamp passed between those pieces Ver. 17.18 in that same day the Lord made a Covenant with Abraham This cutting of the sacrifice into pieces and passing thorow was a lively and dreadful signe that the party who should break Covenant should be cut asunder and into pieces as he well d●se ved and as he at least implicitely imprecated upon himself notable to this purpose is that in the Prophet Jeremy I will give the men that have transgressed my Covenant Jer. 34.18 19 20. which have not performed the words of the Covenant which they made before me when they cut the Calfe in twaine and passed between the parts thereof the Princes of Judah the Princes of Jerusalem the Eunuchs and the Priests and all the People of the Land which passed between the parts of the Calf I will even give them into the hand of their enemy into the hand of them that se k their life c. that is to be slain and cut in pieces by the Sword And herein I take the Emphasis of the expression to lie Lev. 26.25 I will bring a Sword upon you which shall avenge the quarrel of my Covenant i. e. by cutting them asunder And this custome was conveyed to the Gentiles they went between the fire and carried a Sword in their hands and so took an oath Lib. 10. contra Jul. as Cyril proves out of Sophocles Thus Virgil speaking of Romulus and Tatius Aeneid 8. Hinc foedus à foedo animali foedè mactato Caesae jungebant foedera porcae They cut a Swine in sunder and made a League and to name no more Titus Livius speaking of the League between the Romans and Albans the Foecialis Herald or Minister of those Ceremonies cryed If the Romans shall falsifie by publick and wicked fraud in that day O Jupiter do thou so smite the Romans as I smite this Swine and so knock't the Swine on the head with a stone By all which it appears that Covenants have been ever held solemn and sacred things and that men by breaking of them deserved dreadful punishments In like manner there was the shedding dividing and sprinkling of blood at the making of Covenants and hence it was called the blood of the Covenant Exod. 24.6 7 8. Moses took half the blood and put it in Basons and half of the blood he sprinkled on the Altar and he took the book of the Covenant and read in the audien●e of the people and they said All that the Lord hath said will we do and be obedient and Moses took the blood and sprinkled it on the people and said Behold the blood of the Covenant which the Lord hath made with you concerning all these words Note He sprinkled the Altar instead of God who being incorporeal and a Spirit could not be sprinkled yet being a Covenant party would have the Altar sprinkled for him So much shall serve for the first Question setting forth in our Answer to it the name and nature of a Covenant in general the second Question follows Quest 2. What ground we have to speak of Gods Covenant with Adam and to call it a Covenant there being no mention of it here in the Text nor elsewhere in Scripture do we read of Gods Covenant with Adam Answ However the name be not here yet the thing is here and elsewhere comparing Scripture with Scripture it is a nice cavil in Socinians to call fot the word Satisfaction others for the word Sacrament others for the word Trinity others for the words Faith alone justifying others for the word Sabbath for Lords day c. and thence to conclude against Satisfaction Sacraments Trinity Justification by faith alone and Sabbath for want of expresse words when the things themselves are lively set down in other words so in this case of Gods Covenant with Adam we have 1. Gods Command which lays man under an obligation 2. We have Gods promise upon condition of obedience 3. We have Gods threatning upon his disobedience 4. We have their understanding it so as appears in Eves words to the Serpent 5. Chap. 3.3 We have the two Trees as signs and symbols of the Covenant 6. We have a second Covenant and a New Covenant therefore there was a first and Old Covenant a Covenant of Grace supposeth one of Works Object If any shall say by first and old Covenant was meant Gods Covenant with Israel and not with Adam and so by Covenant of Works the same is meant namely that which the Lord made at Mount Sinai Answ Hereunto I answer There is a repetition of the Covenant of Works with Adam in the Law of Moses Hebr. 8.7 8 9. Gal. 3.12 Rom. 10.5 as in that of the Apostle to the Galatians The Law is not of faith b●t the man that doth these things shall live in them so likewise to the Romans Moses dsscribes the righteousness which is of the Law that the man who doth these things shall live in them Thus it was with Adam principally and properly therefore he was under a Covenant of Works when God gave him that command in my Text. Quest. 3. Wherein then doth this Covenant of Works consist what is the nature tenour and end of it as such Answ 1. This Covenant required working on our part as the condition of it for justification and happinesse therefore called a Covenant of Works Gal. 3.12 thus before the man that doth these things shall live Working indeed is also required under grace now but 1. Not to Justification 2. Not from our own Power Ephes 2.8 Jam. 2.20 3. Not previous to faith which worketh by love and lives by working but man lives by faith 2. A second Characteristical signe of the Covenant of Works is this that in and under it man is left to stand upon his own legs and bottome to live upon his own stock and by his own industry he had a power to stand and not to have fallen this is meant when it is said God created man in his own Image Gen. 1.27 Eccles 7.29 And again This only have I found that God made man upright 3. In the first Covenant namely that of Works man had no need of a Mediatour God did then stipulate with Adam immediately for seeing as yet he had not made God his enemy by sin he needed no days-man to make friends hy intercession for him Gen. 1. ult After mans Creation God said He saw every thing which he had mude and behold it was very good and after the Covenant made in chap. 2. it s said They were naked and they were not ashamed i. e. they had not contracted guilt by committing of sinne from whence onely ariseth shame therefore under the Covenant
to be enlarged by another 5. The fifth thing to be considered in the Gospel-Covenant is the efficacy of it I did not so much as mention the efficacy of the former Covenants for there was never so much as any one made happy by them 't is sadly true that the threatnings of punishment for the neglect of duty took hold of them the threatnings seemed plainly to belong to the nature of those Covenants but in the Gospel Covenant 't is otherwise for it is said John 3.36 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 abides which shews that the wrath was brought upon them by the violation of the former Covenant he speaks as of that which was upon them already But yet mistake not as if refusing the Gospel were no sin or not punished they sin more grievously that sin against Gospel love than they that sin only against Legal goodness but wrath doth not properly belong to the Essence of the Gospel Thus you have the first thing I undertook namely the nature of the Covenant positively considered the second is the comparative excellency of the New Covenant above others I will be brief in shewing its excellency above the Covenant of Works more large in shewing you how 't is better than the Old Covenant of Grace Only suppose to prevent mistakes that each Covenant is in its own kind most perfect and most accommodated to the state of the people and to the purposes for which they were instituted This premised First The New Covenant of Grace is better than the Covenant of Nature I forbear to speak of the agreement and diff●rence of them I shall speak only of the excellency of this better Covenant 1. The Covenant of Works was a Declaration of Gods Justice than which nothing can be more terrible to a guilty sinner but the Covenant of Grace is a Declaration of Gods mercy in Christ and let the overwhelmed conscience speak is not this better 2. The Foundation of the Covenant of Works was the Creation of man and the integrity of his nature the Foundation of the Covenant of Grace is mans Redemption by Jesus Christ 3. The Promise of the Covenant of Works was eternal life in Paradise the Promise of the New Covenant is eternal life in Heaven 4. The Covenant of Works had no Mediator no possibility of recovering the least slip the New Covenant is ratified in the blood of the Son of God 't is composed on purpose for our relief * Camero Thus the New Covenant is better than the Covenant of Works Secondly The Gospel-Covenant is better than the Old Covenant of Grace Beloved you may observe I do not say better than the Covenant strictly Legal but better than the whole Dispensation which the Jews and all other Believers lived under before Christs Incarnation better than the Old Doctrine of spiritual grace delivered by Moses and the Prophets openly promising Eternal life unto the Fathers and the Dull people of the Jews under the condition of perfect obedience to the Moral Law together with the intolerable burdens of Legal rights and yoke of most straight Mosaical policy but covertly under the condition of repentance and faith in the future Messiah prefigured in the shadowes and types of Ceremonies that by this forme of Divine worship and policy a stiffe-necked people might partly be tamed and partly be brought to Christ that lay hid under those Ceremonies So that in short you see the Old Testament or the Old Covenant for by a Metonymie they are chiefly one and the same thing and the Apostle plainly so expresseth himself 2 Cor. 3.14 Untill this day remaineth the same vaile untaken away in the reading of the Old Testament which vaile is done away in Christ and this contains these three things 1. The old kind of doctrine which was openly and principally Legal covertly and lesse principally Evangelical 2. The old way of worship and Legal Priest-hood 3. That Mosaical policy which was tyed to one people * Paraeus This Covenant was made by God to Adam presently after the fall G n. 3.15 afterward to Abraham and his posterity Gen. 17.1 2 7 8. The symbole of this Covenant was circumcision from verse 10. to the 14. I forbear further particularising to whom it was often renewed and confirmed whereupon it is called the Covenants Rom. 9.4 Ephes 2.12 Now the New Covenant of Reconciliation to God by Christ exhibited in the flesh is the better Covenant The Gospel is the Table of the New Testament longè divinio● quam smaragdina Hermetis far beyond the Emerauld Table of Hermes which the Chymists vainly boast to yield the Philosophers stone to enrich all persons and the Panacea that cures all diseases here 's the elect and precious stone 1 Pet. 2.6 * Crocii Syntag. But I will come to particulars only premising this Caution Caution Let not any thing I shall say be interpreted as if I put an hostile contrariety between the Old Covenant and the New in spiritual practice they yield spiritual help to each other Justin Martyr saith that grace is not according to the Law nor against the Law but above the Law therefore they are not adversa but diversa the Gospel in Scripture is called the Law Isa 2.3 only 't is the Law of faith Rom. 3.27 and the Law of the Spirit Rom. 8.2 therefore when we advance the Gospel Rom. 3.31 do we then make voide the Law through faith God forbid yea we establish the Law Gal. 3.21 Is the Law then against the promises of God God forbid for if there had been a Law given which could have given life v●rily righteousnesse should hav● been by the law The believers in the Old Testament were saved by the free mercy of God in Christ Gerhar l. c. Heb. 9.15 He is the Mediator of the New Testament and by means of death for the Redemption of the transgressions that were under the first Testament they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance And their Sacraments and ours Maccov l. c. sealed the same ●hing 1 Cor. 10.3 4. They did all eat the same spiritual meat and did all drink the same spiritual drink for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them and that Rock was Christ. This premised I shall now shew you the excellency of the Gospel-Covenant 1. The Gospel-Covenant is a better Covenant than the Legal in respect of its Original and manner of patefaction 't is true they have both one principal efficient cause but the Law may in some sort be known by nature it was written in mans heart at the first and the character is not wholly worne out Rom. 2.15 The Gentiles shew the work of the Law written in their hearts but now the Gospel was immediately manifested from God to the Church alone Joh. 1.18 No man hath seen God at any time the only begotten Son which is in the bosome of the Father he hath declared him Mat. 16.16 17. And Simon Peter answered
there needeth no Mediatour And hence Moses Law was not properly a Covenant of Works Gal. 3.19 because that Law was given in the hand of a Mediatour 4. The Covenant of Works once broken God abates nothing of his justice no not upon repentance but the soul that sinned dyed Mark our Text Thou shalt dye the death by which doubling of the words in the Hebrew Idiom of speech is meant Vehemency and Certainty Vatablus which was effected and so had continued inevitably without the help of another Covenant hinted in that first promise Gen. 3.15 For the first Covenant gives no relief to a poor sinner when he hath broken it but leaves him hopelesse and helplesse under a fearful expectation of wrath and fury indignation 5. The Lord in the Covenant of Works accepts the person for the Works sake that is he mainly looks at the work how adequate it is to the command and rule which he so exactly heeds that upon the least failer his justice breaks out in wrath neither can any personal excellency in the world salve the matter Deut. 27. ult Cursed is he that continueth not in all the words of the Law to do them and all the people shall say Amen a doleful Amen Jam. 2.10 and whosoever keeps the whole Law and offends in one point is guilty of all Note that whosoever God respects no mans person in that case 6. The Covenant of Works in performance of the condition leaves a man matter of boasting and glorying in himself and makes God a debtour to him Where is boasting it is excluded by what Law of works Rom. 3.27 Nay as if he had said the Covenant of Works affords matter of boasting to him that worketh to justification by his own personal power and righteousnesse Now to him that worketh is the reward reckoned not of grace Rom. 4.4 but of debt i. e. it obligeth God to pay it him as a due which is the language of Pharisees and Papists which were justly challenged and claimed 1. Were we indeed under a Covenant of Works and not of Grace 2. Were our works perfect 3. Did we not lye at Gods mercy for our guilt All which declare man impotent and grace necessary and withal Jews and Papists to be enemies to the Crosse of Christ and Covenant of Grace and under a Covenant of Works of which more anon 7. The Covenant of Works leaves a man still in doubt while resting in it in that state because it is a mutable state at best he had all in his own hands and then Satan cunningly rooked him of all God puts him into a good bottome and leaves him to be his own Pilot at Sea the Divel assaults him and sinks him and therefore the second Covenant takes all into Gods hands that it may continue safe under his Father by care and custoddy 1 Pet. 1.4 5. John 10.28 29. and so gives the soul good security against death and danger which Adam had not while he stood much lesse can any rich or honourable man in his fools Paradise here in this world say his Mountain is unmoveable his glory unchangeable seeing it passeth away as a Pageant 1 Cor. 7.31 if Adams Paradise was so mutable much more theirs if he stood not in his integrity how shall they stand in their iniquity 8. The Covenant of Works was made with all men in Adam who was made and stood as a publick person head and root in a common and comprehensive capacity I say it was made with him as such and with all in him Quo mansit remanente quo pereunte peribat he and all stood and fell together for even the Elect may say We are all by nature the children of wrath as well as others Rom. 3.19 and that of St. Paul We know that what things soever the Law saith it saith to them who are under the Law that every mouth may be stopped and all the world may become guilty before God But the Covenant of Grace is a discriminating thing it takes in some and leaves out others Christ is not a head in Covenant with all as Adam was but of his Elect only for we finde many in the world under the headship of Satan and Antichrist and old Adam who are out of Christ not only because unconverted as Saints themselves are before regeneration but out of Christ in the account of Gods Election Donation and Covenant who have none of his special love nor ever shall have Thus I have briefly opened the distinguishing Characters of the Covenant of Works which might have been more enlarged by those of the Covenant of Grace which is easily done by way of opposition and comparison one with the other and therefore and for brevities sake I omit it and come to the next question Quest 4. Whether this Covenant of Works made with Adam was revived and repeated to Israel in Moses time and if so in what sense and why Answ I answer affirmatively that in some sort the Covenant of Works was revived and repeated to them which appears from these grounds 1. They were tyed to Commandments under a curse Gal. 3.10 Deut. 28 1 2. ver 15.16 2. Blessing is promised to obedience they are both set down by Moses at large in Deuteronomy chap. 28. and elsewhere 3. It is expresly called a Covenant I mean the giving of the Law for obedience The Lord God made a Covenant with us in Horeb. Deut. 5.2 4. It is opposed to the Covenant of Grace as another Covenant upon this very distinguishing account of obedience and faith works and grace as you may see at large among other places in that of the Hebrews Hebr. 8.6 7 8 9 10 c. Now there are foure principal ends which the Lord had in so doing 1. That he might hereby make men know what sin is how prone we are to it and how averse and head-strong against all good this is done by a Law of Works Rom. 7.7 to the 13. ver This indeed is Gods clear glasse by which he discovers to us the moral and penal evil of sin so Rom. 3.20 2. That hereby the Lord might hold men in to obedience by a strong curb because we are so apt to break fence he hedgeth up our way with thornes Hos 2.5 6. 3. That God might stop every mouth and make all guilty before him Rom. 3.19 4. That men may hereby be lash't and driven to Christ as with a School-masters rod to see an absolute need of him and to make out hard after him Gal. 3.22 23 24. For men care not to run to a City of Refuge unlesse the avenger of blood follow behinde at their heels neither do the whole need or regard the Physician but the sick and wounded Yet notwithstanding all this they were not properly under a Covenant of Works neither was the law given to them as such a Covenant meerly 1. Because as the Law was to convince of sin so it