Works because they 1. Signify God's Approbation of the Doctrine 2. Cause men to wonder 3. Are done by a divine and supernatural Power The same words are used 2. Cor. 12. 12. In Signs Wonders mighty Deeds They are said to be divers because they are not onely many of one kind but of several and different kinds as dispossessing of Devils raising the Dead and miraculously healing all kind of Diseases and as they are Works of extraordinary Power and Wisdom so they are of Mercy 2. By Gifts or Distributions of the Holy Ghost according to his own Will So that there were Gifts of the Holy Ghost Distributions of them These according to his Will Gifts of the Holy Ghost were extraordinary Qualities and Powers given such as heard the Apostles Doctrine and believed it as power to heal to speak in strange Languages to prophesy to do Miracles They are said to be Gifts and Effects of the Holy Ghost because they had them not by Nature or Industry or Instruction by Man but from the Power of God-Redeemer and the Spirit of Christ. They are called in the Original distributions or divisions because they were 1. Communicated to divers Persons 2. Were many of different kinds 3. Were given in several degrees They were distributed according to his own Will 1. Freely 2. To whom he will 3. What Gifts he will 4. In what measure he will For there are diversities of Gifts 1. Cor. 12. 4. But all these worketh that one and the self-same Spirit dividing to every man severally as he will Ver. 11. The Effect of these Miracles and Gifts was the confirmation of the Doctrine of the Apostles which they did confirm by Word and Deed For 1. They did most certainly affirm and assert this Doctrine as having heard it immediately of Christ and as having received the immediate Knowledge there of from him 2. They did these Signs Wonders and mighty Deeds and upon the Imposition of their hands Believers received the extraordinary Gifts of the Holy Ghost yet they neither did these Miracles nor gave these Gifts by their own power or holiness But the Works were done and the Graces given by them as Instruments in the Name of Christ as risen and glorified and from God So that the Power of God the merit of Christ their Ministration did all concur to the production of these glorious Effects God was the principal Cause therefore is it said that by these God did bear them witness and attest their Doctrine to be true and from him so that this confirmation was a giving credibility to the Doctrine of the Gospel so far as it was new and delivered the positive truths concerning Jesus of Nazareth dying for our sins rising again sitting at the right hand of God and the dependence of Justification before the Tribunal of God and eternal Glory upon Faith in him making Intercession in Heaven For there was no need thus to confirm the Ceremonials of Moses and the Covenant of God with Israel before Mount Sinai to the Jew For these things he made no doubt of nor was this confirmation needful for to perswade the Gentile of the Equity and Justice of the Morals of the Scripture for the natural light of Reason did approve them These Miracles and Gifts were Proofs very strong and powerful for they were no jugling Impostures or Delusions but real demonstrations of the divine Will and clear to the senses § 7. The Transgression is a neglect of this divine Doctrine thus declared thus confirmed This neglect implies a contempt and is a disobedience to that Law of God-Redeemer by Christ exhibited in not believing and repenting or a positive deâ—ial of this excellent truth in such as never professed it or in Apostates who once received it The punishment is eternal death which can no ways be avoided by the Offenders neglecting this Salvation The force of the Argument is the last and chief thing to be considered To understand this we must observe the Form of the Apostles Argument which is this That sin which makes us liable to grievous and unavoidable punishment must with earnest heed be avoided But to let slip or recede from and neglect the Doctrine of the Gospel is such a Sin Therefore with all earnest heed to be avoided The Apostle in this Argument presupposeth 1. That sin makes liable to Punishment â—ainous sins to grievous punishments some sins to unavoidable punishments For the punishment of some sins are avoidable and the sins whereby we are made obnoxious though committed yet may be remitted Some are not by the tenor of God's Laws remissible 2. That we are made liable to punishment by the divine comminations 3. That the end of Comminations in God's Laws is by representing the penalty as certainly due upon Transgression to restrain us from Transgression and Disobedience For though the Love of God and Righteousness and hatred of Iniquity are the principal Motives to Obedience and Restraints from sin yet the hope of Rewards and fear of Punishments may have great force because we love our selves desire our own peace and happiness and abhor such things as tend to our misery and ruine These things taken for granted make the Proposition good But the doubt might be of the Assumption That neglect of the Doctrine of the Gospel will make us liable to such a grievous unavoidable punishment This he therefore proves thus If Disobedience unto the Law mucâ— more will the Disobedience to the Gospel make us liable to such a Punishment But Disobedience to the Law made the Offenders liable to such a Punishment This the Hebrew and Jew would grant for they knew it but the Proposition onely could be controverted by them Therefore he confirms it from this presupposed in general That greater sins make us obnoxious to greater Punishment but disobedience to the Gospel is the greater Sin And this he proves fully and that from many particulars For this end he proves the Doctrine of the Gospel more excellent than that of the Law more powerfully binding men to receive it and retain it And if it be so then to sin against it is more hainous than to sin against the Law That it is as excellent there could be no doubt for it hath all the excellencies of the Law But that it was more excellent he manifests by four things 1. It was the Doctrine of so great Salvation for such the Law was not It by it self without the Promise could not save eternally and suppose it could yet it was not so full so clear so powerfull and effectually conducing to eternal life 2. It was first spoken by the Lord Christ who is so far above the Angels by whom the Law was given 3. It was confirmed by Miracles far more in number and more glorious 4. Upon the hearing and receiving the Gospel the Believers received many different and extraordinary Gifts of the Spirit which the Hearers of the Law did not For the Apostle saith to the Galathians He therefore that
People as a third part 1. In making the Covenant in signifying God's Will unto the People and returning the People's Answer unto God Exod. 19. 2. 2. In confirming it by Blood as an indifferent distinct person Exod. 24. To which place the Apostle doth allude as we shall understand hereafter in the illustration This is the meaning of the first Proposition The second may be divided for explication and made two 1. Christ by means of Death expiated Transgressions under the former Covenant 2. By means of this Death the Called receive the promise of eternal Inheritance The first implies 1. That there were Transgressions under the former Covenant 2. That there was a Redemption of these Transgressions 3. This Redemption was by the Death of Christ. The first is clear enough for Moses Aaron David and the Saints of God from the times of Moses till the exhibition of Christ had their sins much more others not sanctified The second cannot be doubted of for if there was no Redemption of those Sins and Transgressions then they could not be saved they must suffer eternal punishments as they did temporal By Redemption here is meant Expiation and Propitiation whereby their sins were made remissible and upon certain terms and conditions performed actually to be remitted The third will be granted in general that the Expiation was by Death and Blood but that they were expiated by the Blood of Christ many of the Jews denied Yet if they had understood the Books of Moses they might have known that the Blood of Bulls and Goats could not expiate the Sin of Man a rational and immortal Creature not free from the eternal Punishment Some Legal frailties and infirmities they might expiate and avert some temporal penalties Therefore there must of necessity be some other Death and Blood that must do it And this was the Blood of Christ which all their Ilastical Sacrifices and Lustrations did typify Yet this is not so to be understood as though their Sins were not remissible and remitted till Christ dyed and offered his Sacrifice for by vertue of this Death fore-seen and fore-accepted they were in their Life-time upon their Repentance Faith in Christ to come and their fervent Prayers pardoned They did not rely upon their Legal Sacrifices nor expected Remission from them but relyed upon this Death of Christ to come according to the Promise That in him all Nations should be blessed This Proposition is not to be understood exclusively as though Christ's Death did expiate no Sin but that which was committed under the first Covenant but emphatically to singnify 1. That there was no Expiation for Transgressions under the Law 2. That if Christ's Death expiate former Transgressions under the Law much more will it expiate such as are committed under the Gospel 3. That there was no reason as some observe why they should be offended with the Death of Christ seeing without his Death and Blood neither they nor their Fathers could be saved but must suffer eternal penalties The second part of this second Proposition informs us that 1. There is an eternal Inheritance 2. There is a Promise of it 3. The called receive this Promise 4. By means of Christ's Death they receive this Promise For in the words we have an Inheritance the Heirs the Conveyance the Purchase or rather the price whereby it 's purchased The Inheritance is eternal Happiness the Heirs are the called the Conveyance is by Promise and Covenant the price of the purchase is Christ's Death and Blood 1. The Inheritance is that blessed and glorious Estate which is to be enjoyed upon the Resurrection for the full possession and enjoyment is reserved for Heaven where it 's said to be laid up and reserved It 's said to be eternal in opposition to the Land of Canaan which was the temporal Inheritance of them and their Fathers and to be enjoyed with the Blessings thereof so long as they kept the Covenant of their God and this was the Inheritance promised in the former Covenant and to this which formerly was called God's Rest the Apostle seems to allude as a Type of this which was far more excellent and glorious of eternal continuance in respect of the Inheritance it self the parties enjoying it and the enjoyment thereof 2. This eternal Inheritance was promised there was a Promise of it It was God's and the disposal of it was at his Will Man for his sin was cast out of Paradise and forfeited Heaven with the eternal Bliss thereof yet it was in his mind to give it sinful Man who deserved it not so great was his mercy and bounty and Man must know this For this end he promised it and by his Promise bound himself to give it and in it did signify his Will The Effect of this Promise was Obligation on God's part and a Right unto it on Man's part an Hope to obtain it and a Comfort upon this Hope And here it 's to be observed that our Title to eternal life depends immediately upon the Promise and is derived from it for as the Israelites had the Land of Canaan and held it by Covenant and Promise so do all the Children of God expect the heavenly Canaan and hope to have it by Promise of the new Covenant Some do ' understand by the Promise of eternal Inheritance this Inheritance promised yet there must be a Promise received before we receive the thing promised 3. After the Inheritance and the Promise and Conveyance follows the Heirs which are here said to be the called Some are not called at all these have no Promise of the Inheritance Such were the Gentiles before the Gospel was preached unto them they were Strangers from the Covenants of Promise having no Hope and without God in the World Ephes. 2. 12. Some are called and have the means of Conversion but reject the terms of the Covenant and refuse to enter into it and engage themselvs such were the unbelieving Jews and many others Some are called enter the Covenant and solemnly bind themselvs to the observation of it yet do not observe it In respect of these two last it is that Christ saith Many are called but few are chosen Matth. 22. 14. None of these are Heirs Some are called and are obedient to the heavenly Call and keep the Covenant these receive the eternal Inheritance promised and first acquire the Title and after that the Possession Some were called before the Exhibition of Christ some after the former are here principally meant though the latter with them receive the Inheritance 4. These called Ones of former times with us receive this Promise by vertue of Christ's Death expiating their sins and of his Blood purging their Conscience To understand this you must consider that none but such whose Sins are expiated and their Consciences purged can be Heirs for they must be regenerated and acted by the Spirit and adopted Sons before they can be Heirs For as the Apostle argues If Sons then Heirs
presupposeth the Command so the Command presupposeth that God spake by his Son more excellent then the Angels and that they had heard his Doctrine This may be the Use or Application of the Doctrine delivered and confirmed in the former Chapter And the Use after the present mode of preaching is an Instruction which virtually includes an exhortation with a dehortation § 3. Ver. 2 3 4. The reason which may perswade and motive which may incline us to performance of the duty both affirmative and negative follows And it is two-fold 1. From the grievous unavoidable punishment to which upon non-performance we shall be liable and in the end suffer 2. From divine Ordination The first we read ver 2 3 4. where we may observe 1. A punishment grievous unavoidable 2. The cause of it 1. There can be no Punishment where there is no Law transgressed For where there is the Law there is no Transgression Rom. 4. 19. And where no transgression or sin there is no â—â—ath or punishment For the wages or desert of Sin is Death Rom. 6. 23. Punishment therefore is some evil determined and threatned in the Law by the Law-giver against the Transgressouâ— as due unto him upon the transgression It 's opposed properly to a reward promised not to a benefit which is no reward This punishment is grievous and the grievousness is implyed in a Comparison For if the Transgressours of the Law then the Transgressours of the Gospel shall be grievously punished and if the former much more the latter if their punishment was grievous much more grievous shall ours be It 's expressed in two words in the Original in three in our translation a just recompence of reward yet according to the Greek it 's a just retribution or rendring of wages that is a punishment of Death which they deserved and was justly due unto them To deserve and to be â—able to punishment is a consequent and moral effect of transgression by vertue of the Law to determine this punishment is an act of the Law-giver to infact it is an act of the Judge which infliction is a rendring of some evil as due to the party suffering as deserving it But as it is first grievous so it is unavoidable This is expressed 1. In that they under the Law receved it 2. In that we under the Gospel cannot escape it How shall we escape § 4. The cause of this grievous unavoidable punishment is some sin which is here expressed And to understand this more fully and distinctly let 's consider 1. The sin and punishment of transgressours under the Law 2. The sin and punishment of the transgressours under the Gospel 3. The force of the reason The words of the second verse informes us 1. Of the sin 2. The punishment of former Offenders 1. The sin is the transgression of the word spoken by Angels 2. The punishment was the destruction of the Offenders In the Text we have 1. A Law 2. The transgression of this Law 3. The punishment of the transgressours 4. The efficacy of the Law in this punishment If we reduce it to Propositions they are these 1. That a word was spoken by Angels 2. This word was disobeyed 3. The disodient suffered condign punishment 4. By this punishment the Law was made firm and valid In the first we have 1. A word 2. The the same spoken 3. The same spoken by Angels 1. By word is no doubt understood a Law consisting of precepts prohibitions promises threats or comminations which are principally here understood as a part of the Law Some think this Law to be the Decalogue yet this cannot be here intended as it stands alone separated from the Judicials and Ceremonials wherein we find many fearful penal Statutes and Comminations So that by Word is understood the whole body and systeme of those Laws God gave by Moses to Israel neither let any wonder that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 should signify a Word and a Law For in Hebrew Chaldee and Arabick the same verbes which signifie to speak signify to govern and the same Nouns which signifie words signifie Commands and Laws 2. This word was spoken that is this Law was published and promulgated For the matter of the Law the mind and will of the Law-giver the declaration of both do all concurr to constitute the essence of a Law 3. The word and Law was spoken and declared by Angels though the matter and the binding decree was from God and neither of them from the Angels who were used by God in the promulgation Though God in a more special manner is said to have uttered and written the ten Commandments or Decalogue yet in giving of the whole Systeme of the Law he used the ministry of Angels For they received the Law by the disposition of Angels Acts 7. 53. And it was ordained by Angels in the hand of a Mediatour Gal. 3. 19. where by Law cannot be meant the Decalogue alone as appears by the context antecedent and consequent And God Angels Moses did all concurr as one efficient of the promulgation before it could be compleat Therefore there is no need with Hâ—insius to understand by Angels the Prophets as Angels that is Messengers of God Hence appears the vanity and error of Crellius For he doth suppose and take for granted that if the Law was spoken and published by Angels then it was not published by God or the Son of God in the person of the Diety For by this he might argue against the express words of the Apostle Chap. 1. 1. that because the Old Testament and the Doctrine thereof was published and declared by the Prophets therefore it was not published declared and spoken by God whereas it 's expresly said God spake by the Prophets to the Fathers 2. He argues to this purpose that if the Law was in proper sense delivered by God or the Son in the person of the Deity then it would follow that the Apostle's argument to prove the Gospel above the Law were not good for if the Law was published by God or the Son in the person of the Deity the Law must be more excellent then the Gospel But first He takes the Law only for the Decalogue which should not be done 2. He mistakes the Apostle's comparison and argument For the comparison is not in respect of him that spake but of those by whom he spake The Old and New Testament do not differ in this that God doth speak and declare them For both are the Word of God both were spoken by God in which respect they are equal and the same If God had not spoken in both both had not been the Word of God But the difference is in respect of those by whom he spake For of old he spake by the Prophets in the last days he spake by his Son and the Son is more excellent then the Prophets for here is the inequality and the excellency of the Gospel above the Law spoken by Angels and
Prophets not by the glorious Son of God This is the first Proposition concerning the Law given § 5. The second proposition is that this Law was transgressed and disobeyed The sin which was the cause of the punishment is expressed by two words Transgression and Disobedience By these words we must not understand any kind of sin as of ignorance or infirmity or a sin upon surprizal or in petty matters for the best of the Saints and Prophets under the Law sinned in this manner But by them is understood some more hainous sins as Idolatry Blasphemy and such like or rebellion or apostacy or an habitual and continued course of Sin joyned with contempt of the Law For these were capital and capitally punished The third Proposition concerning the Punishment you heard before The fourth is concerning the Efficacy of the Law It was stedfast A Law should be armed with power and coactive force otherwise it cannot be executed and without Execution which is said to be the life of the Law it 's but words and can neither be a sufficient ground of hope in the Promises or fear in the Comminations When the Punishments threatned are inflicted it strikes a greater Terrour In this respect the Law proved firm and stedfast when the Offenders were punished according to their Transgressions and by suffering the penalties they knew that the word spoken by Angels was not vain but valid and effectual There is a three-fold stedfastness or firmness of a Law the first is in respect of the unalterable Will of the Law-giver the second in respect of the Execution the third in respect of the Party to whom it s given who firmly and certainly believes it The first is supposed the second is meant and is a great cause of the third The Emphasis is in the first words If the word spoken by Angels that is the word spoken by Angels and not by the Son proved firm and valid and was made and manifested to be such by the punishment of the Transgressors and especially in this that every transgression with an high hand contumacy and contempt was punished and not say such Offence escaped unpunished § 6. After the Sin and Punishment of Offenders in the times of the Law and Old Testament follow the Sin and Punishment of Offenders in the times of the New Testament The Sin is the neglect of the Gospel The punishment is implyed in the words How shall we escape In the first we may consider 1. The Word or Law 2. The Transgression of it In the Law we may observe 1. The Title or Name 2. The Publication 3. The Confirmation The Title is this so great Salvation by which is meant the Gospel which is called Salvation So great Salvation As in the Law so in the Gospel which is the Law of God Redeemer by Christ exhibited we have 1. Precepts and Prohibitions determining mens Duty 2. Promises and Threats declaring Punishments and Rewards according to mens Disobedience or Obedience and as in respect of the former the Gospel is the Rule of Man's Duty so in respect of the latter it 's a Rule of God's Judgment This Gospel is called Salvation because it promiseth Salvation and being followed brings loto Salvation and is said to be the Power of God unto Salvation and therefore is called the Word of Salvation and the Gospel of Salvation So that it 's called Salvation by a 〈◊〉 1. Of the Subject for the Adjunct because the matter and subject of it is Salvation 2. Of the Effect for the Cause because it â—ath a causal vertue and power to save As it's Salvation so it 's great Salvation because it doth promise and conduce to the attaining of eternal deliverance from eternal punishments and the greatest Enemies and of eternal bliss and full happiness the Word spoken by Angels did no such thing This is the Name or Title 2. The Publication or Promulgation is two fold 1. Began by Christ 2. Continued by them who heard him The Gospel is a Law and the Law of God Redeemer in Christ yet it could bind no man except it were published And it was first published by Christ. The Law and the Doctrine of the Old Testament was spoken and published by Angels and Prophets but this by Christ the Son and Lord Jesus Christ is our Lord by Redemption whereby he acquired a Right unto us and Power over us for because he suffered death for our sins God raised him up and made him Lord and Christ and being at his right hand he hath Power to command men and Angels and is the head of the Church which acknowledgeth his power and submits unto it He began to speak and declare the Gospel both before and after his Resutrection and they who heard him were especially the Apostles by whom afterward â—â—dued with the holy Ghost he declared it first to the Jew and these Hebrews then to the Gentiles It was so spoken as it was known by him and them so fully and clearly as was never done by Prophets and Angels before This is the Publication 3. The Confirmation follows where we must observe 1. To whom 2. By whom 3. By what it was confirmed 1. To whom It was confirmed saith the Author to Us that is to himself and these Hebrews so it 's commonly understood That it was confirmed to the Hebrews there can be no doubt and also to Paul who was an Hebrew to whom the Gospel was preached as to the rest of the Jews and also confirmed to him though he did not at the first believe it Yet it will not follow from hence that Paul received his immediate and infallible Knowledge of the Gospel from the Apostles For this he received immediately by Revelation from Christ as the rest of the Apostles did though they heard Christ as many more did who yet were no Apostles In this respect none can ground an Argument upon these words to prove that Paul was not the Author of this Epistle as divers do Again the word Us is often taken largely and indefinitely not strictly and precisely so as formally to include the person speaking And in this sense because it was confirmed to the Hebrews whereof he was one he might say It was confirmed to Us especially seeing it 's he that writes unto them 2. By whom was it confirmed It was confirmed by those which heard him Now many besides the Apostles did hear Him and also confirm the Doctrine of the Gospel Yet the Apostles did it in a more eminent manner and may be principally though not solely here intended Yet Paul did not hear Christ as the other Apostles did for though Christ spake to him from Heaven yet he did not speak to him as he did to others whil'st he conversed on Earth 3. By what was this Doctrine confirmed It was confirmed by two things 1. By Miracles 2. By the Gifts of the Holy Ghost Miracles are called Signs Wonders Powerful Works They are called 1. Signs 2. Wonders 3. Powerful
immediately design and qualify for this Work § 3. Thus you have heard 1. That a Priest is an Officer in Religion 2. That his proper Work is to offer Gifts and Sacrifices The third thing is the disposition which is most suitable to his place 3. He must be merciful and inclined to compassion as one who himself hath his Infirmity For it followeth Ver. 2. Who can have Compassion on the ignorant and on them that are out of the way for that he himself also is compassed with Infirmity THis disposition and affection is so necessary that no man without it is fit to be a Priest For this reason God contrived a way whereby Christ after he was risen from the dead ascended into Heaven obtained fulness of joy in his presence and pleasures for evermore at his right hand might be sensible of Man's misery To understand the words of the Text we must consider 1. What it is to have Compassion 2. Upon whom he must have Compassion 3 Why he should be the more compassinaâ—e To have Compassion is to be inwardly affected with the misery of another so as to be moved and inclined so far as we are able to help relieve and comfort them Therefore saith one Misericordia est â—iseria aliena in corde nostro The word in the Original is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to suffer moderately or rather in some certain measure 1. He must suffer for he that is merciful doth suffer with them that suffer and mourn with them that mourn for we should be like fellow Members of one Body and as there is a Sympathy or fellow-feeling amongst the Members of one Body so there should be amongst us Yet as our own Passions and Affections should be moderated by the rules of Reason so must this Compassion be it must neither be boundless nor irregular For there be such hainous Offenders and abominable Sinners that they are no fit Subjects either of the Mercy of God or Man and we may exceed in our Compassion Therefore the Rules of divine Wisdom and Justice must regulate and measure the same otherwise we may make our selves unfit to officiate for others yet this was seldom the fault of Priests whose Compassion was usually defective 2. The parties to be pityed and the Subject of the Priest's Compassion were the ignorant and such as are out of the way Ignorance and Errour are often taken for sins yet not such as are capital and crying crimes but Offences committed out of ignorance infirmity and violence of temptation for which under the Law Sacrifices were prescribed and accepted upon the Confession of the Delinquents for there was no Sacrifice to expiate capital sins for they must be punished by Death They which were ignorant and seduced out of the way willing to confess and desirous of pardon were to be pitied as a fit Subject of the High-Priest's Compassion 3. The reason why he should the more have Compassion on these was because he was compassed himself on every hand with the like infirmity and might easily fall into the like Sin This should make him the more careful to make Reconciliation for them as for himself because he might fall into the same condition and it was the Wisdom of God to make such kind of Persons to be Priests § 4. The end of the Priest's officiating and his Compassion was to make Reconciliation for his own and their sins For Ver. 3. And by reason hereof he ought as for the People so also for himself to offer for Sins THe reason why he must be merciful and sensible of the guilt and misery of the People was that he might offer for their Sins and because he was compassed with infirmity and had his own Sins therefore he must offer for himself His own infirmity and sin might move him both to pity them and also seek their pardon as his own To offer for Sins is to do that upon which God hath promised to pardon and remission is the very end and ultimate effect of all propitiatory Sacrifices and the Service of all lawful Priests Before I conclude this part of the Chapter it may be expedient to resolve two Questions The first is Whether it be necessary and essential to a Priest to have sins of his own for which he must offer The second is Whether in the times of the Gospel after Christ had offered his Sacrifice and was confirmed an eternal Priest in Heaven there be many persons properly called Priests and such as are here described To both I answer Negatively For 1. It 's not essential to a Priest to have sins of his own or that he be a Sinner For Christ himself is a most perfect and compleat Priest and yet without Sin yet he is merciful and as sensible of our miseries as any ever was And this indeed was a necessary qualification in a Priest that must make reconciliation for Man and he that is unmerciful is no ways sit to be a Priest for guilty Wretches yet a Priest may be merciful and yet without sin though there never was any such Priest in the World but Jesus Christ the Son of the living God For the second there never was in proper sense since Christ's Ascension into Heaven in the Church-Christian any such Priest as is here described And it 's observable that such as officiate in the Church-Christian and minister in holy things are in the New Testament called Ministers Elders Bishops Pastors Teachers Men of God Apostles Evangelists Prophets but never styled 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Priests much less High-Priest neither are there any Temples Altars Sacrifices in the time of the Gospel that are properly such Some of the Church of Rome do affirm The Masse to be a Sacrifice and the same with that which Christ offered upon the Cross and propitiatory for the Sins of the Living and the Dead Yet seeing they confess 1. That it 's incruâ—ntum unbloody therefore it must needs essentially differ from that Sacrifice and Oblation wherein the Blood of Christ was once shed never to be shed again never to be re-iterated 2. Seeing it 's not essentially the same it cannot be properly propitiatory 3. Seeing it 's not expiatorium redemtorium as they grant it is not How should it be the same 4. That which is a representation commemoration and application of that Sacrifice once offered never to be offered again can neither be the same nor propitiatory And as it is not the same Sacrifice but essentially different from it it 's no Sacrifice at all in proper sense neither can any wit of Man prove it so to be Therefore in respect of it their Priests can be no Priests their Tables no Altars their Temples no Temples When divers of the Ancients call the Ministers of the Gospel or Bishops Priests the Service of the Eucharist a Sacrifice and the Communion-Tables Altars they must either be understood to speak tropically and metaphorically or deliver that which is untrue and also contradict
Othâ—â— imagine it was the whole World which with the parts thereof both the Tabernacle and Temple did represent wherein the Heaven of Heavens is the Sanctum Sanctorâ—n the Holiest of all and the Sanctuary through which the High-Priest passed into the Holiest place the Aethercal part of the World where the Sun and Moon and Stars represented by the Lights in the Golden Candlestick do ever shine Others determine it to 〈◊〉 the Heaven of Heavens whereof they make some different parts as one to be the place of Angels and Saints and another far more glorious which was the place of God's most blessed and special presence That Christ entred the Heaven of Heavens and that 〈◊〉 he ever ministers and makes Intercession there is express Scripture what difference and degrees of places be there we do not certainly know But let the Tabernacle â—e his Body or the Church Militant or the World or the Heaven of Heavens the second doubt is Whither these words concerning this Tabernacle are to be referred If to the former words which say that Christ being rome an High-Priest of good things to come then it 's nothing but this That Christ is the Minister and High-Priest of a far more glorious Sanctuary But some refer them to the word entred and make the sense to be that as the High-Priest under the Law passeth through the first Sanctuary to enter into the second which is the Holiest of all so Christ passed through the Militant into the Church Triumphant And it 's very true that Christ hath his Sanctuary and Temple here on Earth and that 's his Church wherein God dwels in a special manner and he passed through and from this into the Church Triumphant of Saints and Angels where God is more gloriously present and powerful nay he entred through the Aetherdal part of the World into the highest Heavens and through the Heaven of Angels and Saints unto the highest and most glorious place and Throne of God But the former sense that Christ is come an High-Priest and Minister of a far more glorious and excellent Sanctuary seems to be more genuine and confirmed by Chap. 8. 2. § 11. The third Proposition is concerning Christ's Service and Sacrifice offered in this Temple For Christ not by the Blood of Goats and Calves but by his own Blood iâ—â—red in once into the holy place Where 1. We have the Holy place 2. Christ's Entrance into it 3. His Entrance once 4. His Entrance once by Blood not of Goats and Calvs but by his own Blood 1. The Holy place is the Heaven of Heavens signified by the Holiest of all in the Tabernacle and in the Temple for that was the place into which the High-Priest with Blood entred in once every Year so that there is no difficulty in this particular And that Christ entred into Heaven is clear enough For Christ is not entred into the holy places made with hands which are the Figures of the true but into Heaven it self there to appear before God for us Ver. 24. of this Chapter 2. Christ entred into this Holy place But there is a Question made of the time when he entred That he entred forty dayes after the Resurrection it 's clear and express For he was taken up into Heaven Acts 1. 11. He was carried up into Heaven Luke 24. 71. And He that descended is the same also that ascended far above all Heavens to fulfil all things Ephes. 4. 10. But there seems to be another entrance before this and that was immediately upon his Death For when he had given up the Ghost immediately the Vail of the Temple was rent in the midst from the top to the bottom and his Soul separated from his Body and commended into his Fathers hands entred into Paradise That he entred at that time into Heaven with his Soul separated from his Body the Text doth seem to affirm And what should the renting of the Catapetasm and the Inner-Vail immediately upon his Death signify but that the great High-Priest was ready to enter Heaven Again it may be said more properly that he entred Heaven with or by his Blood when his Soul was separated from his Body than when his Body was risen and made immortal and both Soul and Body joyntly ascended For it was the custom of the High-Priest according to God's Institution upon the slaying of the Sacrifice and taking of the Blood to enter the holy Place and the Type and Anti-type should agree especially in this particular Further the expiatory Offering was not compleate till the Blood was presented before the Throne of God in the inner Sacrary and it was suitable to the Type that the great High-Priest should after he was slain on Earth present himself as slain in Heaven before the Supream Judge as having suffered Death and satisfied Justice for the sin of man But all this I leave to the judgment of Learned men who shall seriously search the Book of God and impartially examine whether God doth not speak this in Scripture And howsoever it 's certain that whether he entred thus then yet he so entred at one time or other that he obtained eternal Redemption 3. He entred once This informs us that though the High-Priest entred once every year and so might enter above a thousand times yet Christ entred thus but once For as we shall read both in the latter end of this and also in the beginning of the next Chapter once to enter or one entrance in this manner was sufficient because one Death one Offering was able to do that which all the Offerings of all the High-Priests under the Law could not do neither was any more Offering needful seeing this had done all that was requisite for satisfaction and merit 4. This entrance was by or with Blood and this is set down negatively and affirmatively Negatively this was not blood of Goats and Calves and that with which the Legal High-Priests did enter within the Vail For as we may read Levit. 16. upon the day of expiation a Bullock and a Goat must be slain and with the Blood of these he must enter the holy Place The reason of this is because the blood of Beasts could not satisfy divine justice expiate the sin of man and purge his conscience and immortal Soul and so make the eternal penalty removable Therefore it must be a far more excellent blood the blood of the Son of God his own blood which was pare unspotted and most precious The reason 1. Why it must be by blood is because as without blood under the Law there was no Legal Remission or Expiation so it was the Will of God that without blood there should be no eternal Remission For though God was merciful and sate in the Throne of Grace and Mercy yet his Justice did require that satisfaction should be made and seeing sin was committed and punishment was deserved and due by his Law violated therefore sin must be punished before it could be pardonable
put away Sin by the Sacrifice of Himself THE Subject of these words is the Sacrifice of Christ whereby he entred Heaven it self and of this it 's affirmed That it was but once offered and that by the one Offering of this one Sacrifice the heavenly things were purified by taking away Sin for ever This single Offering of this single Sacrifice is set forth by way of Dissimilitude and Opposition to the Levitical Sacrifices and that 1. Negatively 2. Affirmatively Negatively Ver. 25. wherein we have two Propositions the one concerning the Levitical the other concerning Christ's Sacrifice The first concerning the former is That the Levitical High-Priest entreth into the Holy place every Year with the Blood of others This is meant of the great Anniversary Sacrifice of Expiation which in the beginning of this Chapter the Author singled out as the greatest and highest piece of Service that was performed under the Law with this design to prove the Sacrifice of Christ to be far more excellent in many things especially in the vertue and effects thereof In this we have 1. The entrance of the Priest into the holy place 2. This entrance made with the blood of others 3. This entrance yearly or every year 1. The holy place was that within the second Veil the holiest of all for into that the High-Priest alone might enter and that but once every year 2. Yet he might not enter without blood and this blood was the blood not of the High-Priest himself but of others that is the blood of Bulls and Goats 3. The principal thing in the Proposition to be noted is the frequency of his entrance and offering for he entred and offered every year God thereby signifying that it was not of eternal virtue The second Proposition is That Christ did not offer himself often He must offer and offer himself and by his own Blood enter Heaven yet he must not do this often his offering must be single and individual both in respect of the Sacrifice and the oblation thereof He must not once entred come out again and offer a new and another Sacrifice or the same again So that the thing that is denyed of this Sacrifice is frequency of offering § 25. In the latter part of the Text ver 26. we may observe 1. The reason why this Sacrifice must not be reiterated 2. The affirmative part of the principal point Yet the whole verse may be said to give a reason of the former Negative proposition and the same is two-fold The first is ab absurdo The second ab inntili â—â—â—-necessario For Christ's offering must not be reiterated 1. Because it was inconvenient and absurd 2. Because it was no wayes profitable or necessary I will sum up the whole in two Propositions The first If Christ should offer himself often then must he often have suffered since â—â—â—â— the foundation of the World The second But now once in the end of the World hath he appeared to put away sin oâ—â—â—â—â— by the Sacrifice of himself The first Proposition implyes 1. That where there is offering there must be suffering for in sacrificing living Creatures the thing sacrificed must be slâ—in as well as offered For mactation and oblation are essential to such as Sacrifice 2. That seeing there was Sin since the beginning of the World and Sacrifice for Sin appointed by God there must be suffering and offering from the beginning of the World or at least some Sacrifice offered which once presented to God should be of eternal Virtue 3. Because the offering of Christ requires necessarily his suffering therefore if Christ's own offering of himself once could not expiate Sin for ever then he must suffer often The absurdity and inconvenience of Christ's frequent offering of himself was this that if he must often offer he must often suffer and this was thought unreasonable to divine wisdom to put his Son so often to such a cruel Death For by Suffering is meant suffering of Death in that manner as Christ Suffered Yet it seemed good unto God to appoint the Levitical High-Priest often to offer and often with blood to enter into the holy place to signify the imperfection of the Legal Expiation that the People might expect a far more excellent sacrifice In the second Proposition concerning Christ's once offering we may observe 1. Christ's appearing 2. The time of his appearance 3. The end 1. Christ's appearance is 1. His Incarnation 2. The manifestation of him incarnate 3. The presenting of himself as a Priest having Sacrificed himself unto his heavenly Father without which his Incarnation and Manifestation had been to no purpose He appeared from the foundation of the World in the Word of the promise and in Types and Figures yet this was but obscure At length he appeared really and far more clearly when the Word was made Flesh dwelt and lived amongst men dyed and as a Priest offered himself unto God the Supream Judge for the Sin of Man 2. The time of his appearance was the end of the World which is opposed to the foundation of the World Yet as this end is not the last so the foundation is not the first day of the World therefore end and foundation must be taken with a Latitude Christ appeared to Suffer a thousand six hundred years ago and upward and yet the World is not ended therefore End signifies the last times of the World which may be many years yet to come as many years of these last â—inâ—es as parts thereof are past already And so the foundation of the World may be the beginning thereof and this beginning may be so far extended as to comprehend many hundred and 〈◊〉 thousands of years This end of the World is called the fulness of the time Gal. 44. because as some tell us the time appointed by God was fully come all things which were decreed to be before his coming were fully accomplished And though we understand not the reasons yet the end of the World was the fiâ—â—ell of all others for this appearance and though the last times seem to have the greatest benefit of his Exhibition yet the first times were not without it for the virtue of this Sacrifice extended to all times 3. The end of this appearance was to put away sin by the Sacrifice of himself Where we have two ends the one subordinate to the other The first was the Sacrificing of himself The second by this Sacrifice to put away Sin Christ was the Priest and the thing Sacrificed was himself and the blood by which he entred Heaven was his own blood and he himself was slain and suffered and he himself did offer himself slain The end and so the effect of this Sacrifice once offered was the putting away of sin This putting away was not the abrogation of the Law transgressed but a taking away the moral effects and consequents of Sin committed against that Law and principally of guilt For one certain and perpetual effect of Sin in
from Christ and deny the Faith he had professed Hardness of heart may be considered as a Judgment of God or as a Sin of Man here it 's to be considered as a Sin And such it may be either in respect of the first Call and so is or implies at least a refusal of Christianity and so it 's either a rejection of that Christianity which was once received and professed or at least makes way for it and thus it 's to be understood in this place For no man can fall off from the Christian Faith once received but his heart must needs be hardned and stand unmoved against all former convictions This considered either in the former or latter sense may be conceived 1. As a Not yielding unto the Reasons and Motives unto belief and profession proposed in the Gospel 2. As an obstinate resisting of these Motives and Reasons joyned with some power of the Spirit And both these may be caused either from the delusion of the understanding apprehending and 〈◊〉 to contrary Motives and Reasons which are not really such but seem to be such which may be called sinful 〈◊〉 as the words of the Text may be understood oâ— from the pure malignancy of the Will or from both Now to prevent all these mutual exhortation is an excellent mean ordained by God to that end And the neglect of this Duty is a great Cause or at least a great Advantage of sin and leaves the way open for Apostacy to come in For frequent proposals and representations of the true Reasons why we should believe and a continual â—itring up to holy Duties are effectual causes of the confirmation of our profession and so of our perseverance § 14. We must mutually exhort one another whilst it 's said to Day for to prevent Apostacy and we must prevent Apostacy because without final perseverance we cannot be partakers of Christ. For Ver. 14. We are made partakers of Christ if we hold the beginning of our confidence stedfast unto the end This seems to be the same with that in ver 6. yet the expression is some what different For to hold fast our confidence and rejoycing of hope firm unto the end is the same with holding the beginning of our confidence stedfast to the end And to be Christ's House the same with being partakers of Christ. So that I need not say much of this Text only some things may be observed As 1. That Hypostasis turned confidence may in this place signifie our Christian Faith 2. That the beginning of it is the first receiving of it or the principles of Christianity 3. That as it may signify a firm standing so it 's applyed to the Soul as firmly standing and continuing in the belief and profession of the Faith without wavering or doubting and is opposed to falling For though the principles and fundamental Truths are firm and stable for ever in themselves yet they are not so firm in the hearts of many who professe them Therefore it 's our duty to seek a firm existence of them in our hearts and a firm fixing of our hearts upon them never to be removed 4. That to be partakers of Christ is to partake of and attain the great Reward of eternal Glory merited by Christ For the word Christ is here taken Metonymically for the benefits of Christ. 5. That though this may seem to be the same reason with the former yet here it seems to be brought as a reason from the penalty that will follow upon our Apostacy which is an unspeakable loss of eternal Glory the greatest benefit Christ hath purchased for us For if we shall be partakers of Christ only upon this condition of perseverance to the end then if we harden our hearts and fall off we must needs lose eternal Glory and that great Benefit which Christ merited § 15. Thus far the Apostle hath made use of those words of the Psalmist To day if ye will hear his Voice harden not your hearts Now he proceeds to the words following As in the Day of Provocation and enlargeth upon them in this manner Ver. 15. While it is said to Day if ye will hear his Voice harden not your hearts as in the day of provocation For some when they had heard provoked c. Where 1. He takes in the former words with this of Provocation 2. Though the Psalmist do not mention whether all their Fathers provoked and tempted God or no yet he observes that only some not all did provoke The connexion of these words with the former seems to be this That as their Fathers by hardning their hearts provoked God to wrath so if they hardned their hearts they will provoke God likewise and he will be offended with them The argument in form is this e must Wnot do any thing that will provoke God to anger but if we harden our hearts we shall provoke him to anger Therefore we must take heed of hardning our hearts and of Apostacy The proposition in these here presupposed is That hardning the heart will provoke The propositions here delivered in the Hypothesis are 1. That some of their Fathers did provoke 2. That all did not provoke That which all these imply and inferr is this as applyed to them That they must not harden their hearts lest they provoke Lest this discourse should not be so pertinent and effectual let us first enquire what this provodation is The Hebrew word is translated by the Septuagint to signify contention contradiction and exacerbation and so they turn it only in this place And the Apostle follows their Translation and useth the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Which is a word 1. Compound 2. Derivative and is derived from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifies bitter as Meâ—â—s or Drinks are biâ—â—er to the taste The signification therefore in this place is Mephorical and informs us That as some Meats and Drinks being bitter are very offensive to the taste so hardness of heart and apoâ—â—acy are very offensive unto God The words used in the Psalm may be either Proper and so translated as in Meribah and Massa or Anellâ—tive as here the Apostle understands them This provocation may be considered either at a Sin or a consequent of Sin here it seems to be a consequent of sin yet necessarily presupposing the Sin Sin every sin being contrary to God 's Law provokes him to anger and gives him just cause to execute his vindictive Justice upon the Sinuer Yet some sins are more provoking then others especially such as are committed by People in Covenant with God who act contrary to their solemn Vows and Engagements as Israel in the Wilderness did And this hardning of the heart so as to fall away is the most provoking of all For it not only deserves punishment and by vertue of the Law makes the Sinner liable to it but provoks God to pass a definitive sentence and to proceed to execution This particular consequent of sin is that which here
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 study ye And as one well observe Studium est vehemens applicatio axim ad aliquid agendum Study is a vehement application of the mind to do something Yet that which is matter of lamentation and a sad presage of the eternal ruine of many Souls is the great neglect of this Duty for few go seriously about it The vigonr and strength both of our Souls and Bodies is imployed and wholly spent in seeking the vanities of the World § 5. The Reasons whereupon the performance of this Duty is urged are three 1. From the sad and woful Consequent 2. From the severity of the all-seeing Judge 3. From the help and assistance of our High-Priest The reason from the sad Consequent is expressed thus Lest any fall after the same example of Unbelief THis implies 1. There is danger and an evil to be feared 2. The evil is falling 3. All and every one is in this danger lest any fall 4. Lest any should sleight the danger he instanceth in the Israelites who fell by Unbelief To fall may be a Sins or a Punishment If a Sin it 's Apostacy which is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifie in this as in many other places Rebellion and Apostacy If a Punishment it 's exclusion out of God's Rest with all the miseries that accompany it so it seems here to be taken By this as by many other places we easily understand how we must conceive of Examples and what use we must make of them If they be examples of Punishments we must account them as executions of God's Laws and especially of his Comminations The use that we must make of them is to avoid those Sins for which they were inflicted and to be the more careful in this particular because by them we may easily know that God's Laws are not only words and his Threats only wind It 's not with God as it 's often with Men who will threaten more then they will or can do Thence the Saying Threatned men live long But here it 's otherwise God's Word is his Deed and his Punishments threatned against Apostates are unavoidable They are not made unadvisedly and out of rash passion but according to the eternal Rules of Wisdom and Justice And let every one know that that God that spareth neither Men nor Angels nor his own chosen and beloved People will not spare Us. Therefore as we desire to escape this fearful Punishment let us labour to enter into that Rest which God hath promised § 6. The second Reason is from the severity of the Judge For Ver. 12. The Word is quick and powerful and sharper then a two-edged Sword c. TO understand this Text we need not doubt whether by Word is meant the Scripture and Doctrine of the Gospel or Christ Jesus which is the Word of God made Flesh or the penal decrees of the Gospel For by Word of God is meant the Law of God with his judicial Sentence For God is here brought in as a most perfect Law-giver and a most severe and exact Judge 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Word is often taken for a Law as the ten Laws or Commandments are in the Hebrew called Ten-words Exod. 20. 1. And 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dabar both in Chaldee Syriack and Arabick doth sometimes signify to Order and Govern and because Government is by Laws and Judgment therefore Word signifies both This is more evident from Chap. 2. 2. Where you read If the Word spoken by Angels was stedfast and every Transgression and Disobedience received a just recompence of Reward Where by Word is meant the Law without all doubt as you heard before wherein there were not only Precepts but Comminations according to which Judgment did proceed and was executed By Word therefore is meant the Law and Doctrine of God by Christ wherein we have not only precepts and prohibitions but promises and threats and according to these God will judge every Man to whom the Gospel shall be preached This is a defect in humane Laws that they cannot reach many Offendors and leave the conscience exempt from humane Tribunals and this is an imperfection in many Judges that they cannot attain the perfect and clear knowledg of many Causes brought before them or if they know them will not impartially punish them The Apostle removes these defects and imperfections from this Law-giver and Judge this Law and this Judgment For the Word or Law of God is quick and powerful The latter word explains the fornâ—er for those things that are living are said to be active in opposition to such things which are dead which have lost their power and to be lively and very active are many times the same and this signifies the efficacy and active power of this Law This active vigour and efficacy is illustrated by a Similitude For the Law is compared to a two-edged Sword which being used by a powerful and skilful hand doth manifest how sharp and cutting it is for it pierceth quickly into the inward parts and divideth between Soul and Spirit and the Bones and Marrow which are most nearly united and more hidden and secret in living Bodies So that in the Similitude we have two acts of a Sword or any such cutting Instrument The first is dividing things most nearly united The second discovering things most secret There cannot be any more perfect division or discovery in any dissection or anatomy then is here expressed The reddition of this Comparison seems to be made in these words And is a discerner of the thoughts and the intents of the heart For this cannot agree to a Sword or any cutting Instrument and therefore the meaning must be that as a Sword doth divide things so closely united and discover things so secretly hidden in Bodies so doth this Law in the Soul especially when it 's applyed by the Judge unto the case of sinful Man to be determined by him The most hidden things in Man as a subject of God's Judgment are the intents and thoughts of the heart and they seem to be closely and inseparably conjoyned both with the heart which is the most intimate thing in Man for cor intimum honunis and also one with another We need not curiously explain the words thoughts and intents of the heart or distinguish between them The heart is the Soul of Man endued with a faculty of understanding and willing such things as are the proper objects of it The Soul is in continual motion and action framing and moulding things with in it self Thoughts and intents are the secret acts both speculative and practical of the understanding and rational appetite The words turned thoughts and intentions may signify apprehensions conceptions judgments noetical or dianoetical consultations about mens intents concerning the ends decrees and all other acts of the Soul and may here be so understood And many of these acts and operations are most secret and concealed and in respect of them God saith The heart of man
in it self but as it is an object of that hope which is a divine vertue and this eternal Life which though it be not the only yet is the principal object of our Christian hope Sometimes it 's taken properly for the expectation of this glorious and great Reward of eternal felicity It presupposeth Faith whereby we certainly believe it possible to be had and enjoyed with a vehement desire and longing after it And though the distance between us and it be great yet we are patient and willing to stay God's leisure There is a vain and groundless hope which is irrational there is a rational and probable hope yet not so firm and certain there is a firm and certain hope and that is when we have assurance of the thing hoped for This assurance also may admit of degrees for it may be full or not full This full assurance is the second thing and it 's that which removes all doubts and fears and this it may do at sometimes and not at others it may be interrupted or continued to the end This place speaks of full assurance of hope to the end This assurance will not be had much less continued to the end by sloth by diligence it may And so we are in the third place come unto the Duty which is to use all means and that with diligence whereby we may attain this assurance and continue it full unto the end And here he implies that they had been formerly diligent and so diligent as to have attained this assurance yet here he tells them 1. That they must continue the same diligence to the end 2. That the same diligence zeal affection they had shewed formerly being continued would serve the turn Assurance or certainty is either of the thing or the person The latter presupposeth the former for there can be no certainty to the person of a thing which is not certain in it self This certainty is in respect of the person who is either God or Man Eternal life is certain in respect of God who is able to give it and hath decreed so to do And that it might be certain unto us and that before the time of possession he hath signified his purpose bound himself by promise and confirmed his promise by Oath so that on his part it 's fully and every way certain Yet because the promise requireth a qualification and a performance of duty in the person to whom the promise is made therefore before we can be certain we must not only perform the duty and have the qualification but we must certainly know that we have done that which the Promise requireth and are duly qualified And the more clear and full the knowledg is the more full the assurance of hope and if this full knowledg continue this full assurance continueth to the end which is no groundless presumption but a firm and well-grounded hope Yet this is so to be understood that so far as Man may neglect his Duty and abate in the Qualification so far this assurance may abate If man's diligence in performing the Duty continue to the end this full assurance will do so too For to them who by patient continuance in well-doing shall seek Glory Honour and Immortality God will render eternal life Rom. 2. 7. Yet this patient continuance in well-doing depends upon God's special assistance and support For it 's God that worketh in us the Will and the Deed of his good pleasure Phil. 2. 13. And this is the reason why we must work out our Salvation with fear and trembling The full assurance not only depends upon the merit and intercession of Christ the Decree Promise and Oath of God but also requireth the diligence of Man and the continual support of God God's support assistance and concurrence are alwayes ready yet so is not Man's diligence For the best and most confirmed Saints on Earth may sometimes be remisse and so have their failings whereupon follow desertions to their great discomfort Yet neither do their failings wholly annihilate Grace nor frustrate the final event but God sometimes in his wonderful wisdom by with-drawing his comforts awakens and quickens them to Duty and useth outward Afflictions as Chastisements to improve their inherent virtues and corrects them And in that he promiseth to be their Father he binds himself to Chastise them if need require Otherwise he should not take them as Sons but account them as Bastards and so utterly neglect them So that we may apply that of the Psalmist in this case If his Children for sake my Law and walk not in my Judgments If they break my Statutes and keep not my Commandments Then will I visit their Transgression with the Rod and their Iniquities with Stripes Nevertheless my loving kindness will I not utterly take from him nor suffer my faithfulness to fail Psal. 89. 30 31 32 33. So God's adopred Children may have their failings yet God will Chastise them that their Covenant may stand firm unto the end Yet let every one be diligent to the end and look for no comfort but upon performance of Duty For that God who is most merciful will be holy and just and he requires his Children should be so too Therefore let all those who have made so great a progress in Grace as to attain a full assurance of hope and a sight of their heavenly Canaan go on with all care and diligence for it 's a sad thing after that we are upon the borders of our heavenly Country to be turned back and wander in this Wilderness For Ver. 12. We must not be slothfull but followers of them who through Faith and Patience inherit the Promises § 14. THE Duty exhorted unto may be sufficiently understood by what hath been said already but that 's not sufficient it must be performed Yet who will go about it except it be reasonable And to manifest this is the next Work of the Apostle declaring the Reasons and Motives the first whereof is from Examples 1. Of many not named 2. Of Abraham in particular Examples do prove the Duty to be not onely possible but to have been actually performed and as such they do not bind though they may encourage but because the matter of them is something commanded they may and do oblige and not onely so but God commands us to imitate them and for that end makes them known and proposeth them yet in these patterns there is a special reason and motive superadded for as they by Faith and Patience obtained the Promises so shall we if we follow them The Persons intended are patterns for imitation in two things 1. The end whereat they aimed which was the attainment of the Promises 2. The means whereby they attained this end Faith Patience 1. They attained the Promises By Promises understand the things promised which were spiritual deliverances blessings and rewards and in one word Salvation yet temporal Mercies in reference to spiritual are not to be excluded For God
Commandment going before for the weaknesse and unprofitableness thereof Ver. 19. For the Law made nothing perfect but the bringing in of a better Hope whereby we draw nigh to God BY these words we understand that the Reason why the Law was changed is the same why the Priest-hood was changed and it was from the Imperfection of both Both were imperfect for neither severally nor joyntly could they perfect any man And here the Order of the things is not Order of the words for the Order of the matter is this 1. The Law is weak and unprofitable 2. It was so because it was defective and not effective of perfection it could perfect nothing 3. For this Reason it was disanulled 4. It was disanulled by and for the bringing in of a better Hope whereby we draw nigh to God In Ver. 18. we have 1. The disanulling of the Law 2. The Reason which was the weakness and unprofitableness thereof For explication 1 You must know that by Law is meant the Law of Moses and the Covenant made with the Fathers 2. This Law is said to go before that is to be a former Law or Covenant and this it 's said to be in respect of the Gospel which followed after For consider it absolutely many Laws and Promises were made before it and in particular the Promise made to Abraham was before it 430 years 3. By disanulling of this Law is signified the abrogation of it The Essence of a Law is the binding force of it whereby it obligeth the party subject to the power of the Law-giver to Obedience or Punishment to abrogate a Law is to take away this binding force so as the Subject is freed from the Observation of it and so from all penalty upon the Non-Observation His not doing of it or his doing contrary unto it is no Disobedience nor can make him liable to penalty 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the word here used if it be applyed to and affirmed of the party subject and under a Law it signifies a prevarication and transgression of the Law because the party offending as offending carryes himself as though there were no Law and on his part makes it void It 's opposed privatively to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is the making of a Law and giving force unto it This disanulling of it was an Act of God who by revealing the Gospel took away the binding force of the Law and made it void and so took away the very being of it as a Law 4. The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 many times is used expletively for ornament sometimes it 's used to signify verily as here it 's translated and signifie not onely the truth but the certainty of the Proposition to which it doth belong and so it may do here The Reason of this abrogation and nulling of the Commandment is 1. The weakness 2. The Unprofitableness Weakness is the want of internal strength and efficient power Unprofitableness is the want of some good which by its efficient acting a Cause may bring unto another thing capable of that Good which by reason of it's impotency deficiency it cannot effect This weakness in the Law was not a want of Physical but Moral and Supernatural power whereby it might bring some Supernatural and Moral good unto that People which did observe it Yet this is not so to be understood as though it had not the power of a Law for it had that both in the Precepts to bind and direct and in the Promises to profit upon the Observation of it For it was sufficiently both binding and profiting in respect of that end to which God intended it But he never intended it for supernatural Expiation and Sanctification but he annexed it unto the Promise and subordinated it to the Gospel for to direct them to Christ and the Gospel to come Therefore the Jews before Faith that is the Gospel of Christ exhibited and glorified were kept under the Law shut up or confined unto the Faith which afterwards should be revealed Gal. 3. 23. And they who then observed it found it effectual in the enjoyment of the Blessings it did promise and they who transgressed it in suffering the penalties it did threaten And this was the great errour of the Jews both before but especially after the Gospel was revealed to expect supernatural Expiation and Sanctification from it as though they had no need either of Christ or the Gospel § 23. In Ver. 19. we have 1. The deficiency of the Law 2. The efficiency of the Gospel The deficiency of the Law is that it made nothing perfect The efficiency or efficacy of the Gospel that by it we draw nigh to God That the Law made nothing perfect proves that it was weak and unprofitable 1. By nothing understand no Person 2. By perfect to justify and sanctify upon Expiation So that the Argument of the Apostle in Form is this That which perfects nothing is weak and unprofitable But the Law perfects nothing Therefore it 's weak and unprofitable This proves from the non-production of the effect the insufficiency of the Causal power in the Law And this is so to be understood that the Law did neither actually perfect neither had any power to perfect any person But that which it could not effect the bringing in of a better hope whereby we draw nigh to God could fully accomplish The profit which the erring Jew expected from the Law was perfection and he believed there was strength and power in the Law to produce this effect Yet God did never teach him so but reserved this excellent power unto the bringing in of a better Hope where by better Hope is meant the Gospel and by bringiag in the Promulgation of it after the Law and upon the Law The Gospel is called a better Hope because by the Promises made therein to them who observe it we have firm and certain hope of perfection and sanctification and so of eternal life and this hope is so much the more certain because of the blessed Spirit of God which accompanying it doth enable us to obey the Precepts and seals the Promises for it writes it in our hearts So that what the Law could not the Gospel can effect Some will have this better Hope to be the Priest-hood of Christ but that cannot well be For 1. That is opposed to the Priest-hood of the Law not to the Law it self which is opposed properly here unto the Gospel and the Gospel to it 2. The Gospel presupposeth the Priest-hood of Christ and the Expiation made by the Priesthood and it is a means of Application and Communication of the benefits of that Expiation The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 turned bringing in seems to be taken from Law-givers who bring in one Law after and upon another either to confirm or intetpret or repeal and abrogate the former at least in part The Gospel is a Law of God Redeemet in and by Christ brought in and after the Law
Case When that which is perfect is come then that which is in part shall be done away 1 Cor. 13 10. Both Law and Gospel have their Teachers Teaching and the matter taught which is the Knowledg of the Lord and both agree thus far Yet they differ in the Quality Power and Manner in which respects the former shall cease and the latter continue There shall be no such Teaching under the Gospel as under the Law because there shall be a far better The second Enquiry is Whether these words are added to the former only for Explication or for to inform us of another distinct Promise Upon due consideration they may be found so to explicate the former as to add another Promise For they signify 1. That the end and issue of God's putting his Laws in their mind and writing them in their hearts is to know God the only true God and Jesus Christ whom he hath sent 2. To know God and Jesus Christ far more perfectly than ever they could do under the Law 3. To know him so as never to depart from him as their Fathers did 4. To know him so as that God should be their God for ever and bind himself in an everlasting Covenant unto them And this effect it should have not in a few but in very many of all sorts of all Nations And all and every one in whom he would thus write his Doctrines should thus know him fear him love him and obey him constantly and cheerfully so as they should not need either so much teaching admonishing threatning correcting punishing as they did under the Law nor be in such danger of departing and revolting from their God as their Fathers were For our God doth so deeply imprint his heavenly saving Truth in our hearts as that we shall be enamoured with Christ and so firmly adhere unto him as never to be separated from him This Effect it is not onely able to produce but hath actually produced it in thousands and millions This may be a new Promise whereby God doth engage himself not onely to be our God and take us for his People for a time but for ever For after once he becomes our God as here is meant he not onely rewards us but amongst other things doth continually minister unto us the sanctifying Power of his Spirit to enable us more and more to keep his Covenant that so in the end we may obtain the final and eternal Reward for he first writes his Laws in our hearts that upon our first Faith and Conversion he may first become our God and after he once is our God he writes them more and more that he may continue to be our God for evermore He will not only begin but finish the great Work of Salvation § 14. There is another Promise of unspeakable comfort expressed Ver. 12. For I will be merciful to their Unrighteousness and their Sins and their Iniquities will I remember no more THis is a Mercy of that concernment and necessity to sinful Man that all the rest without it are nothing The thing promised is eternal Remission of all sins Where we have 1. Sins 2. Remission of Sins 3. Remission for ever 4. The Person remitting 5. The Persons to whom they are remitted 1. For Sin we have three words 1. Unrighteousness 2. Sins 3. Iniquities Two of these are only named in the Prophet and the Apostle adds the third according to that of Exod. 34. 7. where we find three Hebrew words as we do Psal. 32. 12. And the Septuagint translate the three Original words by these three Greek words which are here used by the Apostle And here it 's implied That the People with whom God makes this Covenant have their Unrighteousness Sins and Iniquities and some of them not onely many but very hainous What Sin is I need not here define because I have done it more at large in my Theopolitica where I explain the meaning of the Apostle's definition 1 Joh. 3. 4. Sin presupposeth a Law-giver one Subject and under his Power a Law and the Obligation of the party subject And it 's a disobedience to the Law Here God's the Law-giver Man 's the Subject Commandments the Laws and when Man acts moves or is inclined contrary unto these Laws then he sins The Commands of God are his Rule and he ought to follow it and his heart ought to be conformable unto it and that freely and upon Knowledg For Man is bound to know the Law and to observe it And when Man sâ—vervs from this Rule he forsakes the Wisdom and Righteousness of God and follows his own Imagination and the Suggestion of the Devil and is carried away from his God by his base and ill-disposed Will and Lusts. And though all Sin is base yet some sins are more hainous than others Amongst other Consequents of Sin Guilt and Punishment are most remarkable and there can be no Sin which makes not Man guilty and liable to Punishment though the Punishment may be removed or the Suffering of it prevented And because God in his Law promiseth not only temporal but eternal Rewards and threatneth not only temporal but eternal Punishments therefore the condition of the guilty is very miserable and the more guilty the more miserable And if once we see our condition and be sensible of it our Souls are troubled and fearfully tormented and the thoughts and remembrance of Judgment are very terrible not onely because we are in danger to lose the eternal Rewards but to suffer eternal Punishments 2. Though there be Sins and the Guilt after the Sin is past remains yet there is Remission This Remission is a kind of loosing and dissolving an Obligation This Obligation here to be loosed is Guilt which is not Obligation to Obedience which is the Act of a Law but unto Punishment which follows upon the transgression of the Law by vertue of the Law and the Commination Pardon therefore and Remission is a freedom from the Guilt and so from the Punishment by necessary Consequence This Remission in this place is expressed by two words the first is I will be merciful the second I will not remember their Sins and Iniquities The first implies that Remission is an Act of Mercy pure and free Mercy for he that is guilty is in the hands of the Judge to punish or spare him and if he spare it 's a favour and an undeserved kindness Yet the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 mercifull doth sometime imply such a Mercy as presupposeth some satisfaction and propitiation made without which Mercy and Pardon will not be granted and so it 's taken in this place For though God be merciful and inclined to pardon yet he will be just and Justice requires some expiation to be made by Blood or some other way and this to manifest his purest holiness and hatred of Sin and that he will not suffer his just Laws to be violated and yet let the party violating go free without any
respect of the prohibition and commination of the Law is guilt and rendring of the Sinner obnoxiâ—us unto vindicative Justice of the Law-giver and Judge This guilt can no waye he taken away but either by suffering or pardon or both as here it 's put away by Christ's suffering and God's pardon for Christ suffers for Sin God pardons it so Christ's sake and in consideration of his suffering and offering The effect of Sin is to render the party sinning obnoxious and liable to punishment and God's vindicative Justice and by this virtue of the commination of the Law God to make way for pardon by a transâ—endent extraordinary power makes Christ man's Surety and Christ voluntarily submits himself out of love to his Brethren to God's will so far as to suffer Death for man's Sin and offers himself as being â—lain to the Supream Judge Upon his submission he becomes one person with sinful man as a Surety with the principal and so is liable to that punishment which sinful man should have suffered as a Surety becomes liable to pay the debt of the principal From all this it 's evident that Sin is an efficient moral cause of Christ's suffering and Christ's suffering is a punishment in proper sense though both these be denied without any reason by the Socinian By this Legal substitution of Christ and the offering of himself Sin is made remissible and the way is made open to pardon and upon the penitency and faith of the Sinner actual pardon follows That Sin is pardonable and pardoned is the end and effect of Christ's Suffering To put away Sin is first to make Sin pardonable and the consequents of Sin removable For this is the work and immediate effect of Christ's Sacrifice of himself and the same not often but once offered in the end of the World In all this we may observe the difference between Christ and the Levitical High-Priest Christ suffers and offers himself and enters Heaven with his own Blood but the Levitical High-Priest offers often and enters with the blood of Bulls and Goats The virtue of the High-Priest's offering was but for a little time but the virtue of Christ's extends to all time In these respects Christ's Sacrifice is far more excellent and more purifying § 25. This discourse of Christ's once offering and once suffering is continued and enlarged for the Apostle informs us that the reason why Christ suffered but once in the end of the World was the Decree of God which had determined of Christ as he had done of other men and this decree was regulated by Divine Wisdom which alwayes dictates that which shall be best and fittest This Decree is two-fold 1. Concerning other men 2. Concerning Christ. And because there is some agreement between the lot of Christ and other Men in respect of Death and that which followeth Death therefore the singularity of Christ's Death is set forth comparatively And of the comparison we have 1. The Proposition Verse 27. And as it was appointed unto Men once to dye but after that the Judgment IN which words we have 1. Something 's ordained 2. The ordination The things ordained are two 1. That men once dy 2. Come to Judgment The words absolutely considered may be reduced to two Propositions 1. That it 's appointed unto men once to dye 2. But after Death follows Judgment The first tells us 1. That men dye and this we certainly know 2. That they dye but once 3. That this is appointed yet though men must dye and it 's so certain and so evident and easily known yet men little consider it but their hearts are strangely taken up with the things of this life and they admire the vanities of this World and promise unto themselves long life and certain enjoyment of these earthly things They do not remember that they are mortal and that there is no assurance that they shall live one hour before Death arrest them and seise upon their estates and all earthly comforts in that day their thoughts perish and their pride and glory are laid in the dust Oh inconsiderate Wretches are ye able to conquer Death turn Mortality into Eternity and Earth into Heaven Be wise and never forget that you must dye 2. Men dye but once there is no return into this World again neither any recovery of what man once dead hath lost As no man can keep alive his Soul so no man can raise his Body and re-unite the Soul unto it This is a work proper to God who made us and far above the power of any Creature When it 's said That men must dye it 's to be understood of the generality of mankind that all must dye because all are obnoxious to Death and Mortal even Enoch and Elias and all those who shall be found alive when Christ shall come to Judge the World And though the two Prophets did not and they who remain till Christ's coming shall not dye as others do yet the former suffered and the latter shall suffer a change equivalent to Death though in both there seems to be some exception from the general rule So to dye but once is the general rule and the ordinary fate yet Lazarus and others may dye twice because God reserved an arbitrary power to himself to raise some unto a mortal life so that they became obnoxious to a double Death and he did exercise this power to manifest his Glory in some particular persons Yet this was an extraordinary case and this reservation did not take away the general and ordinary rule according to which the Apostle is to be understood 3. This is appointed for so the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is understood and translated and it 's capable of that signification by a Trope The party who appointed decreed and ordained both that all men shall dye and dye once and but once is not expressed but it 's easily understood For the Supream Lord of Life and Death who hath an Universal Power over all Men is God and none else and therefore this must be a Decree of God as Supream Lord and a Sentence of him as Judge and the same irrevocable yet dispensable in some particular and extraordinary Cases as should seem good unto him Death is a punishment and therefore men being obnoxious unto it must be guilty of some Crime and condemned thereunto for some Offence against some Law threatening Death And that was the positive Law which God gave to Adam saying But of the Tree of Knowledg of Good and Evil thou shalt not eat of it for in the Day thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely dye Gen. 2. 17. This Law was transgressed and the Sentence followed in these words Dust thou art and to dust thou shalt return Gen. 3. 19. Whereas the Socinian saith That Death is natural and not from any Decree of God his Opinion is not reconcileable with that of the Apostle As by one man Sin entred into the World and by Sin Death
they apprehend the peril so will their fear be and they cannot apprehend the Judgment but as very grievous near at hand pressing hard upon them and unavoidable and so it will terrify and torment them before the time of Execution The sum of this Text is that as there is no hope of mercy and pardon so there remains a fearful expectation of grievous punishment and the same unavoidable § 28. And lest the Apostate should slatter himself and promise impunity to his Soul the Apostle proceeds to prove it unavoidable and very grievous according to the hainousness of the Sin and this he doth in these words Ver. 28. He that despised Moses Law died without mercy under two or three Witnesses Ver. 29. Of how much sorer punishment suppose ye shall he be thought worthy who hath trâ—dden under foot the Son of God and hath counted the Blood of the Covenant wherewith he was sanctified an unholy thing and hath done despite to the Spirit of Grace THese words are a Comparison and it 's two-fold 1. In quality 2. In quantity The first is presupposed and implyed The second intended and expresly delivered The first in quality informs that as he that transgressed Moses Law was punished without mercy so shall he be that Sins wilfully under the Gospel after he hath received the knowledg of the Truth In the second in quantity we may observe 1. The Proposition ver 28. 2. The Reddition ver 29. In the handling of these we must consider 1. The parts absolutely 2. The whole under the notion of a Comparison 3. The force of the Comparison as it is a reason In the Proposition we may take notice of 1. The party to be punished 2. The manner of judicial proceeding 3. The punishment it self 1. The party to be punished is one that transgressed Moses Law that is the Law of God given to Israel by Moses where we have the Person and the Crime or Cause The Person is one under the Law of Moses while it was in force before the time of the Gospel The Crime is a transgression of that Law and this transgression was not any disobedience but such as for which there was no Expiation appointed no Remission in that Law promised it was such a Crime as God determined to be capital and to be punished with a Capital punishment and loss of Life The word is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is the same with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the Septuagint intrepret by the word used in the Text and both signify to revolt and that Revolt from the Law was answerable to Apostacy from the Gospel This was a breach of that fundamental Law Thou shalt have no other Gods but me This was a revolt from the true God their God whom they had acknowledged to be their God unto Idols Yet there might be other Crimes which might so grate upon the Foundation as to amount to this hainous sin of Revolt 2. The manner of proceeding against such a Transgressour was by information and delation of such a Transgressour before a competent Judge who must proceed Secunduns allegata probata and could not justly sentense the party but upon evidence Sometimes the fact might be notorious or confessed and sometimes maintained by the party offending yet the ordinary way was by Witnesses and in case of a man's life he required two witnesses at least in which respect singular is testis nullus testis The end of witnesses was Evidence that so the merit or demerit of the Cause might appear to the Judge and so the Cause be in an immediate capacity for Sentence 3. The demerit of the cause once made evident Judgment passed upon the party and he was sentenced to Death without any mercy and this Judgment must be executed So that if the Judge did make the Law of Moses his rule he could not acquit or absolve the party nor impose any other punishment nor help the Offender by commutation nor abate the least of this penalty for he by his transgression had made himself uncapable of mercy In this Proposition two things are especially to be noted 1. The Crime which was hainous 3. The Punishment which was Death without mercy § 29. The Reddition follows in the next words where we must observe as before 1. The Sin 2. The Penalty 1. The Sin is described or rather aggravated from three particulars It 's 1. A creading of the Son of God under foot 2. A counting the Blood of the Covenant whereby the Transgressor was sanctified an unholy thing 3. A doing of despite unto the Spirit of Grace The Sin is Apostacy and no man can Apostate from Christianity once received but he shall be guilty of the Contempt 1. Of the Son of God 2. Of the Blood of the Covenant 3. Of the Spirit of Grace The first aggravation therefore is from the contempt of the Son of God For 1. The Apostate treads under foot the Son of God the expression is metaphorical and presupposeth that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and affirmeth that he though the Son of God is trodden under foot To tread a thing under foot is 1. To undervalue it if it be of any worth 2. To vilify it 3. To vilify it very much 4. To expresse this contempt by casting it upon the Ground and trampling upon it which is the greatest debasement and is sometimes an expression of utter detestation Thus Jezabel was thrown down upon the Earth and trampled upon by Jehu's Horses To vilify and debase things that are base is no fault and to despise unworthy men is tolerable but the Apostate undervalues vilifieth and in an high degree the Son of God and the greater his dignity the greater the indignity He is not meer man though man yet as man the best of men for he is the Son of God and that not any kind of Son but the only begotten and beloved Son of God the brightness of his Fathers Glory and the express Image of his person and so the Son of God that he is God Though he did descend so low for a little time as to be made man and humbled himself so far as to take upon him the form of a Servant and in that form to be obedient unto Death the Death of the Cross yet in this low estate he was the Son of God But after his humiliation even as man he is advanced to the right hand of God and is made Lord of Men and Angels an everlasting King an everlasting Priest Yet this Son of God the Apostate Christian so far vilifies as that he denies him to be God to be the Son of God to be a just Man nay judgeth him to be an Impostor a false Prophet a Malefactor and justly and worthily Crucified and if he had been living on Earth and in the Apostate's power he would have dealt with him as they did Thus neither the Person and Deity of Christ nor his Natures nor the personal Union of them nor
Method of the Apostle is this 1. He compares the Law and the Gospel 2. By this Comparison manifests the excellency of the Gospel above the Law 3. From this manifested he inferrs the Duty They must not reject the Gospel and fall away 4. He urgeth the Performance of the Duty from the severe and terrible Punishment which must be suffered by such as perform it not So that from the 18th Verse to the 25th we have the Doctrine and in the 25th the Use. This Argument hath great Affinity with that we find used Chap. 2. 2 3. § 19. This being the Coherence whereby the Scope of the Apostle may be understood Let us consider the words themselvs wherein we may observe the Doctrine concerning 1. The Law 2. The Gospel 3. Their passing from the one to the other 4. The Use to be made of it In the first we have 1. The Manner of Promulgation 2. The fear it caused in Israel and Moses 3. Their freedom from it According to these three things we have three Propositions 1. The Promulgation of the Law was terrible 2. Being terrible it caused both Israel and Moses to fear exceedingly 3. These Hebrews were freed from this Law 1. For to understand the manner of Promulgation we must know the place and that in general was a Mountain in particular Sinai a Mountain in Arabia the Desert This Mountain is said to be palpabilis tactilis touchable or which may be touched that is it was visible and sensible a Mountain bodily accessible though not at that time and on Earth This is added to put a difference between this Hill and the spiritual Zion which is sometimes called Heaven from whence the Gospel was revealed therefore when Christ revealed the Gospel it 's said he spake from Heaven whereas when God gave the Law on the Mountain he is said to speak on Earth Ver. 25. This place was not terrible in it self but at this time because of the Fire wherewith it burned at that time For some Mountains where there are Vulcans as upon Vesuvius Aetna Hecla the Pike of Tenariff and many in America and other places of the Earth to burn with Fire is usual But this Burning was extraordinary at this time for the Mountain then did burn with fire Deut. 5. 23. yea it did burn with fire up to the midst of Heaven Deut. 4. 11. as though Heaven and Earth had been on a flame And this was some resemblance of that dreadful Fire which shall consume the combustible World at the latter day The flaming Fire gave Light but there was Blackness and Darkness which might be caused by thick Clouds and Smoak which covered the Mountain for â—as before it burnt with Fire unto the midst of Heaven with Darkness Clouds and thick Darkness Deut. 4. 11. For Mount Sinai was altogether on a Smoak because the Lord descended upon it in Fire and the smoak thereof ascended as the Smoak of a Furnace and the whole Mount quaked greatly Exod. 19. 18. There were also Thundrings and Lightnings and the Noise of the Trumpet and the Mountain smoaking Chap. 20. 18. This was a Type of that utter Darkness of Hell Besides there were Tempests and terrible Storms a Sign of God's fearful Indignation which shall fall upon the Wicked The Sound of the Trumpet and the Voice of words did encrease the terrour for the Voice of the Trumpet was exceeding loud Exod. 19. 16. And all the People saw the Thundrings and the Lightnings and the Sound of the Trumpet Chap. 20. 18. This Trumpet did summon the People to appear before the Lord and did prepare them for to receive the Law and to hear their doom if they should transgress it As this was a Legislative so there shall be a Judicial Trumpet to convent the whole World to appear before the Judgment-seat of Christ An Arch-Angel shall sound the Trumpet and the Noise shall be loud and miraculous When the People were prepared on the third day the Trumpet sounded and then followed the Voice of words for God condescending to the Capacity of Man gave the Law out of the midst of the Fire and spake in an audible Voice in the Language of that People that they might understand it As the Sound of the Trumpet so the Voice of God was loud majestick terrible like Thunder so that the Words or Commands of the Law were dreadful not only in respect of the Sound but the Matter This dread and terrour did appear in two things 1. In this that they that heard entreated that the word should not be spoken to them any more for they said to Moses Speak thou with us and we will hear but let not God speak with us lest we dy Exod. 20. 19. And again they said Now therefore why should we dy for this great Fire will consume us If we hear the Voice of the Lord our God any more we shall dy Deut. 5. 25. Let me not hear again the Voice of the Lord my God neither let me see this great Fire any more that I dy not Chap. 18. 16. 2. They could not endure it and this is evident from their fear of Death And if Israel could not endure this Voice of the Law-giver and the sight of the Lord how will Wicked men endure to see Christ come from Heaven in flaming Fire and to hear his Sentence Go ye cursed into everlasting Fire prepared for the Devil and his Angels the most dreadful words that ever God spake or Man did hear or shall hear The terrour was yet greater for there was a Line drawn and a Range sixed to keep both Man and Beast at a Distance from the Mount and Moses was commanded to set these bounds before-hand to the People and if either Man or Beast came within the Range they were stricken dead instantly by Lightning or Thunderbolts The Reasons why this Law was given in this manner are many as 1. To signify the Majesty of the Supream Lawgiver and that they inight know that the Laws given were not the Laws of men but of the great Lord of Heaven and Earth And the more clearly he did manifest himself the greater Authority the Law must needs have 2. Great and weighty things are done with greatest solemnity and the more the solemnity is the greater Impression is made upon mens hearts 3. Seeing the very Promulgation and giving of the Law was so dreadful how dreadful must the Transgression be this was a mighty Motive to incline them to Obedience Therefore Moses said that God was come to prove them and that his fear might be before their faces that they sin not Exod 20. 20. 4. This did let them know that little Comfort was to be expected from that Law which did so strictly command and ministred no Power to obey had no Promise of Pardon therefore they should more earnestly desire and look for that great Prophet by whom God would speak unto them more comfortably and by whom they might have free access and
to be Overseers which have a Charge of men's Souls committed unto them for Direction unto eternal Bliss and also Rulers because of their Power and Authority whereby they may in the Name of Christ command them to obey his Laws and in this respect the People are subject unto them in that manner that if they hear and receive them they receive Christ who sent them and God who sent Christ And whosoever receiveth not but despiseth them desplseth Christ and God who sent them 2. These Guides lest they should be ignorant who they were were such as had spoken the Word of God unto them The Word of God is that part of the Word of God which we call The Gospel which is concerning Christ exhibited humbled exalted and reigning at the right hand of God contained in that part of the Scripture we call The New Testament This Doctrine is the Word of God not only because it speaks of God but also because it was revealed by God and that by his own Son in the last dayes This Word they had spoken and declared both by Word and Writing and that infallibly according as by Inspiration they had received an immediate Knowledg of it and this their infallible Doctrine was the Rule of inferiour Teachers 3. These they must remember Some of these might be living some of them dead both must be remembred To remember in this place is to call to mind which presupposeth a former Act of Understanding and is a Reiteration of the same Act upon the same Object These must be remembred not only as Men but as Guides and as such as had spoken the Word of God even unto them so as that they had heard them and learned from them the Mystery of the Gospel so as to believe in Christ Yet amongst these they must principally remember the most eminent and in particular those by whom they had believed For if men begin once to forget their Teachers they will soon forget their Doctrine The second part of their Duty to which their former Remembrance was subservient is the Consideration of the end of their Conversation Their Conversation and Course of life no doubt was agreeable to their Doctrine and the Word of God they taught their Preaching and their Practice were suitable and as their Conversation was good so the End was answerable In that Faith they lived in the same they dyed and as their Life was holy so their Death was happy In these words some observe two things 1. That these were dead and some of them at least had sealed the Truth of the Gospel with their Blood and dyed Martyrs 2. That they had been constant in the Profession and Practice of that heavenly Truth which they had preached and taught to others This Constancy and blessed Issue of their Conversation they are exhorted to consider and seriously review with the Eyes of their Souls as a rare and excellent Pattern worthy their Imitation 3. And if they were so worthy Imitation it was their Duty in the third place to follow their Faith that is their Doctrine which they preached believed professed practised unto Death and which they confirmed by their Suffering This is the true End of hearing Word of God and the true Use of all good Examples which are given us and set before our Eyes for this very End that we may do as they did and as they taught us both by their Words and Works their Doctrine and Practice We must follow the Example of all good men and above others of such Guides as these were amongst these Guides the most eminent in Truth Piety and Perseverance because their Doctrine and Life did agree and contiued suitable to the End § 8. It followeth Jesus Christ the same c. These words seem to stand absolute in themselvs without any dependance upon or Connexion with the Context antecedent or consequent and this hath given occasion to many several and different Expositions Some of the Ancients consider them in themselvs and understand them of Christ as God and from them prove his God-head by his perpetual Existence because he was is and shall be for ever and by his immutability because he alwayes is the same Some understand this of Christ as Redeemer whose Power and Efficacy in redeeming and saving all such as believe in him was from the first time that he was promised unto the World's End for he saved all those who believed in him for to come and all such who believe in him already come and exhibited Both these senses are true but whether intended here or no may be a Question But most Expositors consider the words in Coherence either with that which goes before or that which follows 1. With that which goes before and that two wayes 1. That as Christ the Word not incarnate or made Flesh spake to Joshua and promised not to leave him and forsake him so if they follow the Faith of their Guides and Teachers and persevere in the same to the End Christ will be with them and not leave them nor forsake them 2. That the Faith of their Guides was Faith in Christ according to their Doctrine of the Gospel concerning Jesus Christ an eternal unchangeable and never-failing Saviour and this their Faith in Christ they must follow and then Christ will be to them the same he was to their Guides and will certainly save them In this sense the words not only signify what kind of Faith that of their Teachers was and what was the Object and Foundation of it but also contain a Reason why they should follow it For their Faith was Faith in Christ which is the only saving Faith for ever as he Himself is the same for ever The Aethiopick Version favours this sense in part for thus they translate the words Follow me in the Faith of Christ c. So that according to this Christ is Faith in Christ. But others understand by Jesus Christ the Doctrine of Jesus Christ which is the same as Christ is and that for ever and never shall be changed Therefore they must follow it and never turn from it Christ may by a Metonymy signify Faith in Christ and the Doctrine of Christ because he was the Object of their Faith and the Subject of their Doctrine This Vatablus terms an Enallage This seems to be confirmed by the Exhortation following To apply this to our selves as it is our Duty so we must have a care often to remember the Apostles and their Successours who have taught us the Word of God and considering their happy Departure out of this World with the Joy and Comfort which they found in their Saviour let us follow their Doctrine and their Faith in Christ which if we do we shall have the same End and find the same Comfort in Christ who will be the same to us which he was to them for as He so his Doctrine is unchangeable for ever and whosoever shall follow his Doctrine and believe in him shall