Selected quad for the lemma: law_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
law_n	become_v	gain_v	weak_a	7,469	5	11.0638	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A62865	Christs commination against scandalizers, or, A treatise wherein the necessitie, nature, sorts, and evils of scandalizing are clearly and fully handled with resolution of many questions, especially touching the abuse of Christian liberty, shewing that vengeance is awarded against such as use it to the grievance of their weake brethren / by Iohn Tombes ...	Tombes, John, 1603?-1676.	1641 (1641)	Wing T1802; ESTC R1928	96,775	467

offending them There 's not due the same tendernesse of offending an unbeliever or evill person as of a christian brother but as there is due to a christian brother a more affectionate love so likewise a more tender regard of not scandalizing him Servants are to bee carefull of not hurting their Masters cattle but most carefull of their children so ought christians to bee carefull of not offending evill men who are Gods creatures but most carefull not to offend the godly who are his children Yet that the resolution of this question may be more full I conceive that unbelievers or evill persons are differently considerable in this matter of not scandalizing them according to the diversity of their estrangednesse from the true faith or obedience For 1. there are some who though they yet professe not the truth nor shew themselves to be regenerate have yet some beginnings of affection to the truth we professe and the obedience we practise that are lesse vitious more inclinable to hearken to the truth then some others that begin to perceive some part of the truth As our Saviour said of the Scribe that answered him discreetly telling him that to love the Lord with all the heart and with all the understanding and with all the soule and with all the strength and to love our neighbour as our selves is more then all whole burnt offerings and sacrifices whereby hee shewed that he had not the dreggs of Pharisaisme in him which was to conceive themselves righteous by observing the outward ceremonies and duties of the law that hee was not farre from the kingdome of God Mark 12. 34. Now of such we are to bee tender that we scandalize not them by intempestive use of our liberty If a Nicodemus among the Pharisees be but a listner to his doctrine our Saviour thinks good not to reject him but to draw him on further if a Papist yet remaining in the Roman Church begin to mislike the Idolatry of that church their magnifying their owne merits c. and yet out of a reverend esteem though erroneous of the Church of Romes orders mislikes the eating of flesh on a friday Charity should make me rather forbeare in such a ones presence to eat flesh at such a time then to give occasion to such a one to count our religion licentious and thereby estrange him the further from the truth For sith a principall end of not offending our brother by the abuse of our liberty is that wee may seeke his profit that he may bee saved if in true judgement or our opinion the not scandalizing him would tend to that end we ought to forbeare out liberty that wee may not offend him It being a sure rule Finis dat mediis ordinem mensuram amabilitatem The end gives order measure and desireablenesse to the meanes thereto tending 2. Some unbelieving evill or unregenerate persons are further off from the kingdome of God being plaine and professed adversaries to the way of truth and righteousnesse but yet not out of wilfull malice but blinde zeale As the Iewes of whom the Apostle speaks that they had a zeale of God though not according to knowledge Rom. 10. 2. Now the scandalizing of such men is not so much to bee regarded as of the former because there is lesse likelyhood that our forbearing our liberty should alter their judgements or practise yet for as much as according to the nature of vehement persons out of ignorance though they bee impetuously carried in that they doe yet if they discover their errour they are as soone turned therefore it is probable that some yielding to them may win upon their affections and make way for such insinuation as may give opportunity to discover to them the truth we ought so far to abstain from our liberty as not to confirm them in hard conceits of the truth and so farre to please them in the use of our lawfull liberty as may serve to make way for the recovering of them out of errour As for example sake If wee should meet with a zealous Papist that never understood the truth of our profession but is an adversary to it upon misinformation of his Priest his parents acquaintance as that our religion is meere novellisme carnall licentious c. We ought so farre to abstaine from our lawfull liberty or to please him in a thing lawfull which he affects as in our apprehension we conceive may make way to our reducing him into the right way And this I find agreable to the Apostles resolution 1. Cor. 9. 19. 20. 21. 22. Though I bee free from all men yet have I made my selfe servant unto all that I might gaine the more And unto the Iewes I became as a Iew that I might gain the Iewes to them that are under the the law as under the law that I might gaine them that are under the law To them that are without law as without law being not without law to God but under the law to Christ that I might gaine them that are without law To the weak became I as weak that I might gain the weak I am made all things to all men that I might by all means save some Lively exemplifications of which professions were his practise of taking a vow on him related Act. 21. of his forbearing his power 1. Cor. 9. 18. 1. Thess. 2. 6. 9. wherein he did not shew hypocriticall policy like those that Proteus-like can transform themselves into any shape for evill purposes but serpentine wisdome joyned with dove-like innocency commended by our Saviour Mat. 10. 16. the end being not his own advantage but the salvation of others 3. Some are adversaries to the truth out of malice being setled therein by love of unrighteousnesse and hatred of righteousnesse The converting of these being in a sort desperate the scandalizing of them by the use of our liberty is not to bee regarded Our Saviours example Mat. 15. 14. is a sufficient rule to direct us in this case When the Pharisees were offended because of his doctrine that that which goeth into the mouth defiles not a man our Saviour bids let them alone sith they are wilfull and incurable Let them fall into the ditch T is true wee are bound by Gods law not willingly to provoke any to anger much lesse to provoke any greater sinne in him but rather to avoyde such things as may cause these evills But when we meet with such enemies as being wholly possessed by Satan are setled in their enmity against us and the truth we professe wee then are to be carelesse of offending them by enjoying our conveniency as knowing that our restraint may be uncomfortable to us and unprofitable to them A third question may be whether strong ones may bee scandalized by the use of Christian liberty Aquin. 2 a 2ae q. 43. art 5. propoundes this question whether passive scandall may befall the perfect and hee denies it alleaging a sayng of S. Hierome majores

time it lasteth nor that which is extrinsecally evill as being contrary to the governours commandement or to the restrained parties vow or the verdict of his owne conscience or being scandalous and hurtfull to his neighbour is extrinsecally evill to all but only those who are under that government that vow that opinion to whom it happens that their use of their liberty may become the harme of their neighbour That which is evil for a subject of the King of England to doe may not bee evill to the subject of the King of Spaine who hath made no such law as the King of England And that vow that binds him that made it bindes not another which hath made no such vow and that opinion which one man hath and that harme of our brother which restraines one man from the use of his liberty restraines not another whose action would cause no such harme in whose mind is no such opinion Having premised these things I am next to enquire into the Apostles resolutions delivered Rom. 14. 1. Cor. 8. 9. 10. chapters concerning the forbearing of the use of our liberty in case of scandall which was then in agitation and determined by the Apostle in those chapters Which that wee may the better understand we are to take notice that as appeares by S. Lukes history of the Acts of the Apostles and likewise by other histories of Iosephus Suetonius Tacitus and others the nation of the Iewes was in those dayes wherein S. Paul wrote his Epistle to the Romans dispersed over many countries of the world in Asia AEgypt Greece Italy and particularly that many of that nation dwelt in Rome In which citty at that time the great city which had dominion over a great part of the earth the Iewes retained the religion and rites of their nation prescribed by Moses and were for their Sabbaths Circumcision abstaining from swines flesh and such like rites derided by the Satyrists of those times famous at Rome Horace Iuvenall Persius and the rest Now of these Iewes at Rome it pleased God to convert some to the Christian faith as well as some of the Gentiles Wee are likewise to remember that while the Ceremoniall law of Moses was in force the Iewes conceived themselves as strictly bounde to the observances of meates and dayes and other ordinances of Moses as of the decalogue unlesse in such cases as wherein the observing of them was against a morall duty For then that of the Prophet took place I will have mercy and not sacrifice as our Saviour determines Mat. 12. 7. Whereupon the godly Iewes made conscience of obedience to the ceremoniall lawes as to other morall precepts When in a vision all manner of foure footed beasts of the earth wild beasts and creeping things and foules of the aire were presented to Peter to kill and eate he replyed not so Lord for I have never eatē any thing that is common or unclean Acts. 10. 14. Hence they thought thēselves bound rather to suffer any torment than to eat so much as a bit of swines flesh as appears in the example of Eleazar and the mother and her seaven sons in the historie of the Maccabees 2. Maccab. ch 6. 7. wherefore when the Gospell began to bee preached and the ceremonies of Moses his law to bee disclaimed and neglected much contention arose betweene the Christians that were of the Circumcision and those of the Gentiles concerning the necessity of observing Moses law in so much that it was thought necessary to call a counsell of the Apostles and Elders at Hierusalem to decide this difference Acts. 15. So that although by Christs death the necessity of observing them was taken away and the Gospell being promulgated their observation became dangerous as we read Gal. 5. yet such esteem had the ceremonies of the law gotten partly by their originall institution and partly tractu temporis by a long tract of time in which they had stood in force that many Christians not sufficiently instructed in their liberty feared to neglect or break them after their initiation into Christianity as on the other side those that were well instructed in their liberty did neglect them securely they made no scruple of eating meates of neglecting new moones and the like Festivalls And thus was it among the Romans when S. Paul wrot this Epistle to them There were some that would not eat meats prohibited by Moses law but rather eat hearbes nor would they omit the observation of dayes as not knowing their liberty therein so that if it happened they did eat such meats or neglect such dayes it was with doubting and regrete of conscience These the Apostle calleth weake brethren weake in the faith Others there were among the Romans who made no question of eating any sort of meats nor regarded dayes as knowing they had lawfull liberty therein And these are called strong in the faith by the Apostle Now if this diversity had been onely in practise or opinion it had been somewhat tollerable But the difference in opinion and deformity in practise bred among them as usually it doth discord and division For whereas Christian charity and holy wisdome should have prevented all quarrell between them all harming each other contrariwise it so fell out that the strong despised the weak as more scrupulous then needed and the weak with an aggrieved mind judged the strong as licentious and unholy and whereas sometimes the weake by the example of the strong might bee induced to doe that W ch though lawfull they doubted whether it were so or not their consciences were thereby wounded To ease the Christians of this grievance the Apostle as an equall arbitrator thus decides the controversy In this case the strong should take to them the weake in faith shewing kindnesse love to them but not imprudently intangle them with disputes which bred more doubts in them while they sought to cure their errour about meats and dayes that they should not despise or sleight them for their weaknesse but shew them all respect as believers that they should enjoy their knowledge to themselves but not use their liberty to the grievance of their brethrē that they should not so looke to their own much content in the use of their priviledge as to damnifie their brethren and to wound their conscience On the other side the Apostle admonisheth the weake that they neither censure nor judge their brethren in the use of their liberty nor yet venture upon the use of their lawfull liberty with doubting consciences but bee sure that they bee well resoved in their judgements afore they enter on the practise Concerning the other Scripture in which the Apostle sets downe his resolutions in point of scandals the case was thus Corinth was an eminent beautifull citty called by Tully lumen Graeciae the eye of Greece but a Pagan citty In which the people were wont to worship Idols of Iupiter Mars Minerva c. to these they built Temples