been man alone he could never have made an end of suffering God only could not die nor man only rise again from the dead rightly therefore was he both both the Son of God neither made nor created but begotten of the Father and the Son of a man not begotton by any Father but made and created of the substance of a woman Made of a woman c. And even unto this his love brought him for our sakes for whatsoever else he had been made it would have done us little good In this then was the fullness of his love as before of his Fathers that he would be made and was made not what was fittest for him but what was best for us not what was most for his glory but what was most for our benefit and behoof But yet this is but the first step of his fulness he was made once more for our sakes made of a woman and made under the Law too made under the Law It was a marvellous descent and humiliation that the only begotten of the Father should vouchsafe to be born of a woman that the Son of the everliving God should be content to lay aside his own Majesty and glory and cloath himself with the raggs of our mortality to leave his habitation in the highest heavens and dwell in a Tabernacle of Clay whose foundation is in the dust as Job speaks Surely were man turned into a beast into a worm into dust into nothing it were not so great a disparagement as that the Son of God should be made man This making cannot but make his humility and with it his love unto us deep and full but this next making made under the law makes it deeper and fuller still For in that he only took on him our nature but in this our condition First our nature as Man now our condition as sinful men men under the law as it follows that is subject unto the heavy malediction wherewith the Law threatens the breakers of it This was our condition and this he undertook which was much more than to take our nature by that he was made man but by this he that knew no sin was made sin 2 Cor. v. that is made a sacrifice for sin was contented to be handled as a sinner and to endure whatsoever the Law could lay upon sinners and this is factum sub lege made unden the Law indeed under the Law he was and freely was so and it must needs add some fulness to his love that 〈◊〉 was meerly voluntary and free from necessity We indeed though we willingly sin yet we would not willingly lie under the Law but we are either born under it through corruption of nature or cast under it for our corrupt actions whether we will or no but for him who neither knew original soil nor actual sins who though he took on him our flesh yet not that flesh which lusteth against the spirit though born of a woman yet of a woman only without mixture of fleshly generation of a woman but a woman overshadowed by the Holy Ghost and therefore pure in his conception And as conceived by the Holy Ghost so he was united to the Son whereby he became uncapable of voluntary transgression and therefore no less pure in his actions than in his conception but clear and innocent in both just so he was born so just he lived for him I say if he come under the Law it must be Love and not necessity that shall bring him lex justo non est posita no Law for the just no Law could touch him The Law was added because of transgressions saith the Apostle 1 Tim. i. 9. but no transgression was found in him who could convince him of sin and therefore quid illi legi what had he to do with the Law or the Law with him He might indeed well be Dominus legis Lord of the Law as he said he was Lord of the Sabbath but sub lege under the Law or subditus legi subject to the Law to the pain and penalty of the Law no Law in the world could make him had he not of his own accord made himself so And therefore it is not natus but factus not born under the Law no nor fallen under it neither that 's our condition but made under the Law to shew that it was not laid upon him either by natural necessity or through voluntary breach but meerly by his own free undertaking was made that which naturally he was not and in justice ought not to be Made therefore not by any other but by himself who of his own accord and out of his own love unto us freely undertook and pay'd that debt which he owed not otherwise no power of Law no malice of Devils no nor the wrath of the Father could ever have seised on an innocent person had he not of grace and great compassion unto men taken on him the person of sinners and in their stead put himself under the Law that they might be freed from the punishment Freely therefore and of his own accord without all constraint without any necessity of meer love and compassion factum sub lege made under the Law And now the doctrine begins to be comfortable indeed comfort there was in it and not a little in his first making ex muliere when he was made of a woman for made of women we are all so there was an alliance and consanguinity between us in that besides the flesh and blood which the Divinity assumed must needs be advanced to great glory so there is honour in it also to our nature But yet if this were all if there were no more in it than so his alliance with us and the honour of our nature in him would prove but a cold comfort God knows for what good is it to us that our nature is exalted in anothers person though to the height of Heaven if we our selves be thrown down and perish in the depth of Hell in our own persons or what were we the better to have a kinsman great and wealthy if notwithstanding we lye in prison under the Law for our own debts Sure his wealth is little unto us unless he relieve us with his wealth But if he please to become our surety to enter into bond and put himself under the Law for us then he shews the part of a true kinsman and there is real comfort in that Such and far worse was our case and estate such and infinitely beyond it was his love and compassion We were debters indeed by virtue of a handwriting that was against us Colos. ii 14. a handwriting of ordinances which was our bond for we were bound to keep and perform them but we brake the covenants and so forfeited our bond and in it forfeited no less than our lives The condition of our obligation was no money matter it was not pecuniary but capital and the debt of a capital obligation is death Now he
by one and the same reason which both imagined◠was to be had of both these opposite Decrees And therefore as they saw a necessity of framing the one so they ordered the other the one making both upon foresight the other both absolute whereby it is impossible but either of them must err in one since both cannot be true For if Reprobation upon foresight only leave man to be the cause of his ruine let Election be upon foresight too and by the same reason it intitles him to his own salvation So on the other side if an absolute Election make God the Supream Author of all our Good how should as absolute a Reprobation choose but say the same of him in our Evil For if good works be therefore the effects of Gods Election because it is absolute evil works must needs be the effects of absolute Reprobation for the same reason what is said of one cannot be denied of the other especially since they do so exactly square and sort one in all points answerable unto the other Election that is absolute intends the end and then provides the means doth not absolute Reprobation do the like wherein they say the first Act or Decree of God was to manifest his glory by the declaration of his Justice but because Justice might not be shewed but upon sinners he did in the second place Will Ordain and Decree for these are the words of some and it is the meaning of all the ingression of sin by the fall of Adam that so he might make a way for the execution of his Justice according to the former Decree and whereby they are of necessity constrained thereunto For either God by his second Decree must determine Adams Will unto the committing of Sin or Adam by the freedom of his Will should have power to frustrate Gods first Decree in the Declaration of his Justice Horribile decretum fateor an horrible Decree I confess saith Mr. Calvin whom but in this and his Platform I shall ever honour A horrible Decree indeed and of all pious minds to be abhorred that first makes God unjust that so he might shew his Justice which in regard of the former is not just neither Nec enim justitia dicatur for his Justice shall not be just saith Fulgentius si puniendum reum non invenisse sed fecisse dicatur if he doth not find but make Men worthy of that punishment which it inflicts For what greater injustice saith the same Father quà m lapso retribuere poenam quem stantem praedestinâsse dicitur ad ruinam than to punish him for falling whom he did predestinate to fall whilst he stood It is reported of Tiberius Caesar that he had a great desire to have certain young Maids of Rome strangled to death not for any offence of theirs but such was the cruelty of his disposition only because he had a mind to have it so but understanding that it was not lawful by the custom of the Countrey to put Virgins to death he decreed and commanded so to open a passage unto his former purpose that the Hangman should first force and vitiate and afterwards strangle them I forbear to make application it is too manifest and chuse rather to pray and make supplication unto Christ that he would be favourable and merciful unto the Doctors and Pastors of his Church if deceived through Errour they are bold to teach and speak and write according to the example of Tiberius I know it is not their desire or meaning to charge God with the Sin and Iniquity of Man they constantly and with great indignation deny him to be the Author thereof but like ill Logicians they deny the conclusion and in the mean time establish those premises from whence though they grow hoarse yea burst with denying it will of necessity follow All the distinctions brought for the purpose fail and should a Man rack and ransack every dusty corner of his brain for more they would still be all too few to defend or excuse it That of the act and of the vitiosity in the act with the lame instance of an halting Horse or an untuned Lute is often urged and may have its use but not here For God they say is the cause of the action but not of the obliquity in the action As when a good Horseman rides a lame Jade or a skilful Musician strikes a crackt Lute the one is the cause of the motion but not of the lameness the other of the sound but not of the harshness these are defects wherewith they are not to be blamed because they arise not from their manner of working but from the distemper of the subjects on which they wrought After Adam indeed had lamed and maimed himself by a fall this distinction finds room for application but what hath it to do with Adam in his Innocency free from all lameness or laxation in his joints a well-strung and a well-tun'd Instrument Nor when the question is by what means he came to his hurts let them take heed how they make God ride him lame or strike him so as to strike him out of tune Let him be never so acute he shall find it an hard matter to bestow the action upon one and the obliquity on another In positive and affirmative precepts where a good action may be ill done as he that gives Alms to be seen of Men 't is easy to distinguish the vitiosity from the act but in negative inhibitions where not the manner of acting but the act it self is forbidden so that do it after what sort soever he will he can never do it well how we can discern the one from the other and how God in this case may be the cause of the act and not of the Sin which is necessarily annexed to the act because the act is it which is implyed is more than my apprehension can reach unto I know there is a difference even here between the act and the Sin because the act as the act is not evil but as forbidden by the Law But how God may be an antecedent cause that Adam should eat and yet not the cause of his transgressing the Law when he did eat is that which I say I cannot and which I think few else can any way conceive For when God by his will leaves a necessity of the act I pray what will become of Mans possibility to avoid the sin surely there is no plea for it but this that since necessity hath no Law that which is done under it is no sin for sin is the transgression of a Law Many other distinctions there are alledged as that of the decree and the execution of the decree of necessity and coaction a diverse respect of the Divine decree and the Nature of Man of a double will signi beneplaciti a secret and revealed will and lastly the label annexed unto all is the addition of the End that it is willed and decreed only for the
he doth not sow and requiring a law at their hands to whom he gives no ability for performance In Gods name therefore and mans too let us be content to speak as the Scriptures do which in this here and more than a thousand places besides do seriously urge and necessarily require the observance of the Law and keeping of the Commandments which St. John tells us through the grace of Christ are not grievous neither Such as will needs speak otherwise that they may not be kept either for any time or in any action let them take heed lest they open gates unto impiety and like those Spies in the 13 of Numbers discourage the hearts and weaken the hands of the people of God yea let them beware lest they cast dishonour too as on God himself so especially on the blessed Spirit that inhabits and Christ Jesus our Lord that dwells in his Saints if all yet can produce in any not any thing but sins Much better therefore it were to leave disputing and give good ear to that of our Saviour He that breaketh the least of these Commandments and teacheth others so to do shall be least in the kingdom of heaven that is as some interpret shall least of all others enter into that Kingdom For what is this indeed but to withdraw men from their duty and teach them disobedience for even duties cease to be due whensoever they begin not to be possible But this is every mans constant duty and the whole duty of every man the invincible reason wherewith Solomon here backs his conclusion and withal confutes this opinion Fear God and keep his Commandments for this is c. The Reason is strong and full three degrees or ascents there are in it First a Duty and Secondly universally of all men the duty of man and mans universal duty and Thirdly the whole duty of man And though there be diverse inventions sought out many turns and wrenches made to slip this duty yet one of these three or other will meet with and refel all our devices For they that scruple at the conclusion as impossible evince that they will not stay there but be as apt to quarrel with the duty at least as not simply necessary a duty peradventure in the rigid exaction of the Law and of such as are under it as they were to whom Solomon spake this but we are under the Gospel dead unto the Law that we might be married unto one even to Christ our Lord and our life what then hath this legal duty of Commandments to do with us or we with it since we are mutually dead one to another Yet be we under what times we will or states either so long as we lose not our humanity so long as we cease not to be men under any as being not really dead but morally so long it will have to do with us for this is a duty not of some times and persons but universally of man Neither were they simply under the Law to whom this was spoken led indeed they were by the oeconomy of the Law but yet under the promise and promised seed and were saved by the Gospel as we now are though the Gospel not so distinctly believed then as now it is Neither indeed they nor any people else under Heaven since that promise The seed of the woman shall bruise the serpents head are so meerly under the Law either of Moses or Nature but that if they do their duty keep the Commandments which they have and glorify God according to their knowledge they may for ought I understand be saved too by the Gospel which they knew not for even the Gentiles so doing their incircumcision shall be counted for circumcision as the circumcision otherwise is esteemed but as incircumcision In that day when God shall judge the secrets of all hearts not simply by the Law but according to my Gospel saith the Apostle Rom. 2. And indeed this is the only reason why this duty continues still to bind because men are not under the Law simply but under the Gospel for that is the state only of Devils whose doom is sealed and though the law of their nature cannot be abrogated as being a branch of eternal equity yet they seem not to be lyable unto any mens punishment for the breaches of it now because not capable of any reward for the observance The Gospel therefore doth not evacuate as St. Paul speaks but establish the Law since every man is therefore bound in duty unto the Law because not absolutely excluded from all benefit of the Gospel But we who are under the fulness of this Gospel are in a fuller manner tied and in an higher degree unto the observance of the law than any people else before that fulness came as being bound now by the special coming of the Holy Ghost to keep the Commandments not in the oldness of the letter which as it seems was sufficient whilst the Heir was but a Child and in minority but in the newness of the Spirit for the Spirit it is which gives life and vigour unto the Commandments as being the very strength and power of all lively performance And therefore our Saviour though he came with Gospel in his mouth yea was the Gospel himself yet think not saith he that I came to dissolve the law I came not to dissolve but to fulfil it And that we may know the true fulfilling of it if we think to enter into life belongs to us as well as the entire and perpetual unto himself after he had vindicated the Text of the Law from the corrupt glosses of the Scribes and Pharisees and set it forth in the highest perfection if not added perfections above the Law and beyond that which was said unto them of old he closeth up all at last with this conclusion He that heareth these sayings of mine and doth them I will liken him unto a wise man What then though being dead under the law we become through the favour of the Gospel to be dead also even unto the law yet it is but to the condemning power the killing letter of the law that so we might be married unto Christ our life since the end of this marriage is but to bring forth fruit unto God as St. Paul in that place and that in the newness of the spirit which is not sure to break but to keep with more exactness the Commandments of God This therefore a duty still the duty of Jew and Gentile and Christian too universally of all mankind For this is the whole duty of man c. But though a duty not only in Solomons time but even now under the Gospel yet for all that it may be but a voluntary duty a freewill offering indeed of thankfulness and gratitude or so but not a necessary duty necessary unto life Our life in this World is our justification in Christ and Christ and justification too we have them both by faith and by faith
shall they be reconciled surely no way so well as by looking unto their different intentions from whence it will appear that St. Paul removes works all works from being the things that do justifie and St. James requires them only as conditions and qualifications upon which we are justified For the purpose of St. Paul is by the breach of the Law to demonstrate the necessity of the Gospel that that only is the power of God unto Salvation for since all the world stands culpable before God it follows of necessity that either we must perish without remedy or else be justified by a Gospel of mercy which he well terms the justification of faith in meer opposition to works all works even faith it self as the things which may be thought to justify Now St. James intent is only to vindicate this wholsom and necessary Doctrine from the abuse of Heretical Spirits whose evil words had at once corrupted both St. Pauls meaning and their own good manners affirming that since works could not justifie no works were necessary and therefore it mattered little to observe the Law it was enough only to believe the Gospel Against these dissolute Epicures this Apostle as St. Augustin observes wholly directs his dispute the purpose whereof is not to place justification in the works of the Law for in many things saith he we offend all and if but in one yet are we guilty of the whole but only to shew that unless the works of the Law though formerly broken do come at length to accompany our faith we can never be justified by any grace of the Gospel So then if we divide rightly according to these intents we must distinguish of a twofold justification by Innocence and by Pardon for it must be either by works or by mercy a legal justification or an Evangelical And of two sorts of works subservient unto these several justifications and of two sorts of ways by which they do justify Works of Perfection and perpetual perfection that inherently justifie and formally in strictness of Law but are excluded by St. Paul as no where found in any and works of Renovation after the breach of the Law required by St. James in every one that expect the justification of the Gospel Those works perfectly keep the Law and never break it These keep the Law sincerely but after it is broken They justifie therefore in themselves and by their own worth These not so but because found in none but sinners prepare only and qualifie for the justification of Christ They justifie these obtain justification That strictly the justification of works this properly the justification of faith which is their fountain And faith alone alone without these may justifie yea cannot justifie with them for such works evacuate faith as not needing it which is St. Pauls doctrine But faith alone without these cannot justifie yea without them is not faith not a true and a living faith which is St. James his assertion And in this Reconcilation doth appear the reconciliation and opposition too of both Law and Gospel Faith and works how they conspire and meet how they jar and refuse to mingle For the justification of the Law evacuates Christ who then died in vain as St. Paul speaks For there needs no Saviour where there is no sin And the justification of Christ disanulls again that of the Law as arguing it to be broken yea and the condemnation of the Law too notwithstanding the breach So they contradict and dissolve one another But what the Gospel excludes by remission of sins it closeth withal again by the manner of remitting Never pardoning offences till they be first forsaken and men return again to the observance of the Law nor yet continuing that pardon longer than they shall continue to observe it saying unto none but the penitent Thy sins are forgiventhee nor yet unto them without saying also Sin no more lest a worse thing happen unto thee So the terms stand thus No condemnation from the Law though broken whensoever we return to observe it and until we do observe it no grace or mercy by the Gospel and so they meet and are reconciled For so far the Gospel doth establish the Law yea and farther for it not only requires but gives grace for the performance of that it doth require even the observance of the Law And this reconciliation St. Paul himself the great urger of the opposition every where doth acknowledge for they are his own words not the hearers but the doers of the law shall be justified And that the law is done by faith is evident for faith worketh by love and love is the fulfilling of the law So the Apostles are both met St. James requires Faith and Works St. Paul a working Faith working by love and that even all the Commandments of God not so as to justifie in themselves but only to qualify for the justification of Christ. The Commandments therefore are no freewill offering at pleasure no voluntary duty of gratitude only but a duty necessary unto our justification here and eternal wellfare if any be necessary For this is the whole duty of mâ—n Why but yet for there is no end of wrangling though this wrangle shall end all though a duty now and a necessary yet since the Gospel affords a Mediator were it never so due the debt we hope may be paid by another that is our Surety and that surety is Christ who hath exactly kept the Law and is made unto us Wisdom Justice Sanctification and Redemption so saith the Apostle But no surety in this kind That which is the duty of Man is every Man 's own duty and must be performed in his own Person True indeed it is Christ our Lord fulfilled the Law exactly but that we may break it in our selves and yet at the same time fulfil it in him that is our Mediator this I take it is not so true The Apostle saith indeed that he accounted all things loss and dung too that he might be found in Christ not having his own righteousness which is of the Law but the righteousness which is of God by faith Yea farther that God made him to be sin for us that knew no sin that we might be made the righteousness of God in him but yet this righteousness of God is not to be taken for Gods own righteousness but only as he said in the former place for the righteousness which is of God by Faith which righteousness includes both justification which is imputative and sanctification which is inherent but yet neither in St. Paul's sence is our own because not of the Law but of grace and mercy by the faith of Christ. Be it then that Christ is made unto us Justice and Sanctification both yea Wisdom and Redemption also yet not all after one and the same manner Wisdom he is made because he hath revealed his Fathers will Redemption because he hath appointed a day to vindicate his Children
though there be no absolute cause of his will yet his will is a reasonable cause of all other things and it were most unreasonable to conceive that he should want reason for what he doth that doth all things according to the counsel of his own will that is all outward things for the internal and eternal operations of the Divinity are natural and necessary and of such there is no counsel but all his transient and outward works or immanent acts if they have outward objects of which sort Election is one are free and voluntary and must needs have a reason why they are done because there was no necessity they should have been done All these things he doth not only according to his will but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 According to the Counsel of his Will And whatsoever is done with Counsel or wise resolution hath of necessity some reason why it is done And though this reason as here it is be often unknown unto us who can know no more of his Will than he himself shall please to reveal yet howsoever we know not the reason yet this we know whatsoever the reason be it cannot be drawn from our merits The Election of the blessed Angels who received either a more excellent nature or else a greater ability of Grace than the rest as St. Austin disputes was therefore free and without merit Nay the Election of Jesus Christ the Man to be made the Son of God was of meer grace and goodness as the same Father doth in sundry places affirm And shall Man a Worm and dust of the earth plead desert that only of all the rest deserved nothing but destruction which though otherwise he did not yet for this very arrogance he worthily should deserve How much better were it for them with those Saints in the Revelation to cast their Crowns at the foot of the Throne and with true humility to cry out with David Non nobis Domine non nobis sed nomini tuo da gloriam Not unto us O Lord not unto us but unto thy name give the glory for thy mercy and thy truths sake For we have destroyed our selves but thou hast redeemed our life from destruction and wilt crown us in mercy and loving kindness Then our mouths shall be satisfyed with good things In the mean time let them be full of thy praise for in thee O Lord is our help in whom we live move and have our being for whom and from whom and by whom are all things and to whom be glory for evermore Amen A DISCOURSE OF ELECTION AND REPROBATION PART II. SERMON VI. Upon HOSEA xiii 9. O Israel thou hast destroyed thy self but in Me is thine help HItherto That help and Salvation is of the Lord Now That the death and destruction of man is from man O Israel thou hast destroyed thy self For however it be true that it is God only who properly inflicts destruction in regard whereof it is rightly said vita Mors à Domino Life and death is from the Lord yet because he doth inflict it but for mans wilful offence it is as true that he is not so specially the author of destruction the inflictour as he that deserves it And therefore it is no less rightly said by the Wiseman on the other side Deus mortem non fecit God hath not made death for he desireth not the destruction of the living but they themselves by the errours of their life and works of their hands have sought it out and drawn it down upon their own heads And therefore though life and death be both of God yet after a different manner Vita scilicet à donante mors à vindicante Life is his free giâ—t saith St. Austin but death the reward and wages as the Apostle of mans merit From whence it is that God is ever termed Pater misericordiarum the Father of Mercies but never of Justice because no desert of man can make any claim unto it It is born and bred within himself a Thread like that of the Spiders woven and spun out of his own bowels whose nature and property it is to have mercy and compassion But for his Justice it is not so with it that seems so far from being natural whereunto he is as it were violently drawn against his nature tactus dolore cordis intrinsecùs Repenting and as it were grieved at the heart he said I will destroy the man which I have made Neither is it more proper than natural it is opus suum his Act indeed but Opus alienum suum not his proper but his strange Act as it is in Isaiah because there is something without him which calls for it and requires it too of him And therefore excellently St. Austin Bonusest Deus justus est Deus potest sine bonis meritis liberare quia bonus est non potest sine malis meritis dâ—â—â— are quia justus est God is good and God is just He may save without good deserts because he is good but he cannot condemn without evil because he is just Some notwithstanding affirm he may because they imagin the Creatour hath an absolute power over his Creature but we must beware how we set the properties of God at variance among themselves attributing unto him such a Power as shall thwart and shoulder with his Justice It is no less nay it is more true of him than of his Creature Iâ—lâ—d potest quod jure potest That he only can do which he lawfully may do Not that he is bound by any superiour Law but because as the Apostle said of the Gentâ—le Sibi ipsi Lex He is a Law unto himself which Law in these kind of actions is his Justice not his absolute Will For their Rule is not to be approved that say God doth not will actions because they are right and good but all actions are right and good because he wills them For then he might will any thing without injustice since by willing he makes it just even the destruction of the righteous with the wicked which notwithstanding Abraham thought and was bold to affirm unto God himself of whom he was not blamed for it neither that even in him it would be unjust Whereunto that round and witty saying of St. Austin doth also subscribe Deus reddit mala pro malis quia justus est bona pro malis quia bonus est bona pro bonis quia bonus justus est solumnon reddit mala pro bonis quia injustus non est But this Rule and that power was purposely invented to defend the direful decree of absolute Reprobation that so they might establish dominion and that by might which they saw by equity could not be maintained as I am now to shew and prove being it throws the blame of mans destruction upon God no otherwise than the former Election gives Gods glory unto man The Authors of the one and the other opinion being deceived
that shall undertake such a debt that in this case shall be content to take up our forfeited bond and put in new security of his own be bound skin for skin body for body and life for life and be content to pay the bond too when the day comes his love sure is full and he brings comfort with him to purpose And even this he did this he undertook and this he performed for us He undertook it at his Circumcision and performed it in his passion Whosoever is Circumcised factus est debitor universae legis he becomes a debter unto the whole Law saith St. Paul Gal. v. 3 At his Circumcision then he undertook the debt he entred bond anew with us and in sign that he so did he then shed a few drops of his blood whereby he signed the bond as it were and gave those few drops as a pledge or earnest that when the fulness of time came he would not fail to shed all the rest And shed it he did what at his Circumcision he undertook at his passion he performed even to the full He bound himself in a bound of death and death he underwent even the death of the Cross the most bitter reproachful cursed death of the Cross so payed all to the uttermost farthing and having paid it delevit Chirographum he cancelled the handwriting the sentece of the Law that till then was of record and stood in full force against us but now that the whole world might know it to be void he hung it up in the same place where it was satisfied he nailed it to the Tree of his Cross Col. ii 14. But yet this is not all the penalty is but one part of the Law and he became debtor universae legis to the whole Law saith the Apostle and the whole Law he payed whatsoever was due In the Law we consider a double force or power it hath a commanding and it hath a condemning power a power directive and a power vindicative it hath precepts which it injoins and it hath punishments which it inflicts by the one it informs us what we are to do by the other what we must suffer if we do it not and he was under both parts that both might be fully discharged for as he satisfied the one at his death so the other in his life In his life he exactly kept and observed all the precepts of the Law to the least tittle and in his death he received the full punishment of the Law to the worst and utmost extremity and so was under both and fulfilled both paid all both principal and forfeiture the principal in keeping the Law himself the forfeiture in suffering the penalty of the Law for others that so others might be freed from both Sure now the Sons humility that humbled himself to death even the death of the Cross is full no less full than the Fathers love The Father sent and sent his Son the Son was made and made of a Woman made of a Woman and made under the Law made under the Law and both parts of the Law that he might be fully made And this is Gods fulness Let us now proceed unto Mans fulness for from this fulness of the Fathers love and the Sons humility we all receive the fulness of our own bliss and happiness contained in our Redemption and Adoption for to these purposes all this was done That he might redeem them c. And these two Redemption and Adoption are the two degrees of our making for without them we had been marred utterly undone and they fully answer unto the two degrees of his making made of a Woman and made under the Law He under the Law that we might be redeemed from under the Law he made the Son of Man that Men might be made the Sons of God So the making of him was his own marring but his marring was our making he twice marred by his making we twice made by his marring He of God made Man and of Man made a sinner we of sinners that is bondslaves to the Law made Freemen and of Freemen Sons Sons of God and Heirs annexed with Christ. And what more is there that we could wish to make it up fuller since our desires can extend no farther than to be rid of all evil and to be endowed with whatsoever good is and by these two Redemption and Adoption we are made partakers of both To be redeemed from under the Law is to be quit of all evil and to be adopted into the state of Children is to be intitled unto all that is good For all evil is in being under the Law from whence we are redeemed and all good in that heavenly inheritance whereunto we are adopted we were created to inherit a glorious Kingdom but through sin we lost our inheritance and not so only but together with it we forfeited our lives a sentence of death and everlasting destruction was passed upon us and from this now we are freed by redemption in that again we are reestated by adoption and what would we more But we must speak a little in particular of both and first of Redemption That he might redeem c. Every deliverance is not Redemption but such only as is obtained by a just and a full price so the word imports and something more Redemption a rebuying or buying back again of something formerly sold or forfeited into the possession of another Ever a former alienation must go before and a valuable satisfaction follow after otherwise there may be a bare emption without the former a reemption without the latter but unless both be precedent it cannot be Redemption And sure such a matter had formerly befallen us A kind of alienation had gone before whereby we had made away our selves sold our inheritance and forfeited our lives A making away indeed rather than a sale it was for such a trifle made away first in Adam for the forbidden fruit a matter of no moment since in our own persons daily made away for some trifling pleasure or profit not much more worth And having thus passed our selves away by this selling our selves under sin the Law seiseth on us whose dreadful doom is death and Hell and everlasting sorrows there with the Prince of Hell So infinite a punishment doth it inflict because in the breach of it an infinite Majesty was offended In this heavy case we lay shut up under the Law as in a Prison Rom. iii. 23. fast bound with the cords of our own sins Prov. v. 22. the sentence passed on us and we waiting but for execution what evil is there not in this estate and on every Soul that is in it Our Faith sure is weak and we do not throughly apprehend what we have only heard of but could we see it with the seeing of the eye as Job speaks were we permitted to stand on the brink and look into that fearful pit of everlasting horror whereunto we are condemned by the Law