Linguistic DNA - Concept Modelling Demonstrator

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
law_n	apostle_n	sin_n	transgression_n	5,988	5	10.4357	5	false

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A10384	A gleaning in Gods harvest Foure choyce handfuls; the gate to happinesse. Wounded saviour. Epicures caution. Generation of seekers. By the late judicious divine, Henry Ramsden, sometime preacher in London.	Ramsden, Henry, d. 1638.; Goodwin, John, 1594?-1665.	1639 (1639)	STC 20660; ESTC S115629	109,922	246

these premises they concluded presently that he was an hypocrite Thus it was with the barbarous people Act. 23. Act. 23. when they saw a Viper fastned upon Saint Pauls hand presently the Viper strongly indited him a murtherer Nay Christs Disciples did so Joh. 9.29 Ioh. 9.29 no sooner did they see a man that was borne blind but they they questioned with our Saviour Who sinned this man or his parents that he was borne blind implying that it must needs bee that this man must sinne himselfe blinde So it was with the Iewes in this Chapter Vers 3. they saw Christ despised and rejected of men and presently they inferre that he was rejected of God smitten of God and humbled for his owne sinnes but such men must thinke that even Christ himselfe who like Absalom from the crowne of his head to the sole of his foote had no stayne or blemish of sinne in him yet hee tasted as deepe of the cup of Gods wrath and more than any mortal man besides he that stood highest in his Fathers favour was most low and despicable in the eyes of the world he that was the favourite of his Father in whom his Father was well pleased yet hee was not exempt from that scourge wherewith God chasteneth every Sonne that he receiveth Fourthly if Christ suffered not for his owne sinnes This readâ—s us a Lecture of patience to put up injurice though they bee not deserved in the world It is the plea of some men when they are injured it would not trouble me if I deserved iâ— thinke what Christ deserved at the hands of the Iewes what hee had done that hee was so usâ—d In 2 Pet. 4 21. Christ dyed 2 Pet. 4.21 and hath left us an example to follow his steps What example but an example of patience that we should follow him when wee suffer underserving Seneca gives that advise in his 69. Epistle as if hee had beene a Disciple of Christ 2. Pet. 3.21 We should labour to imitate Corâ—st in this in putting up and digesting injuries though on our part they be causelesse and undeserved In 2. Pet. 3.21 What glory is it if when yee be buffeted for your faults yee take it patiently what great matter is it but if when you doe well and suffer for it then you beare it patiently this is acceptable to God It is true it is acceptable to God that wee suffer punishment patiently when wee have deserved it but when wee are patient and have not deserved it it is highly acceptable as the word imparts Fiftly and lastly Christ dyed not for his owne sinnes then here is Balme in Gilead comfort for wounded and distressed consciences that faint under the weight and burden of their sinnes It is true indeede if Christ had dyed for his owne sinnes then our estate had beene woefull and lamentable then hee had quit scores only with God for himselfe but we should still have remayned as deepely ingaged as ever and have beene cast into utter darkenesse and have beene reserved in chaynes till we had payd the utmost farthing but now Christ hath suffered for us Then as the Apostle inferres Rom. 8.34 Rom. 8.34 Who shall condemne Let Sathan the accuser of the brethren bring what objections hee will this one plea will answer all Christ dyed if he dyed then he hath appeased the wrath of God to us and payd the debt of the Law and the punishment of the Law and fulfilled obedience and given satisfaction to God Christ had no sinne of his owne therefore what hee suffered it was for our sinnes and transgressions This shall suffice to bee spoken of the negative part from this particular But that carries the force of a negation That Christ was affirmed to suffer for his owne sinne We judged him smitten of God and humbled But. The affirmative part followes to be handled But He was wounded for our transgresâ—ions Where I shall not neede to tell you that by being wounded in this place wee are not to understand onely nor principally as some Popish writers doe the bodily torments and tortures of Christ that hee as this day indured on the Crosse but withall and especially those secret agonies and conflicts of soule that he felt that were caused out of a deeper apprehension of the greatnesse of our sinnes that hee suffered for and the sense of the greatnesse of Gods wrath that hee then sustained which being so the conclusion from this affirmitive part is this that Christ Iesus suffered exâ—reame torments in his body and sad and amazing agonies in his soule for our sinnes and trangressions He was wounded for our transgressions c. For the proofe of it I neede not range far from the Text. In the fourth verse of this Chapter surely saith the Prophet hee hath borne our griefâ—s and sorrowes In the fifth vers hee was bruised for our iniquities the chastisement of our peace was on him by his stripes wee are healed In the sixth vers The Lord hath layd upon him the iniquitie of us all In the eighth vers For the transgression of my people was he stricken In vers 10. He made his soule an offering for sinne In the 12. vers he poured out his soule to death Wee see he was broken for our iniquities the chastisement of our peace was on him and this not onely in body but in soule too be poured out his soule to death he made his soule an offering for sinne If you aske the reason why I answer first It is a rule of the Schooles where the gift is free and undeserved without merit or desert on our part there the best if not the onely reason that can bee assigned of that gift is the free grace and love of the doner So this gift is freely from Christs love to us so saith the Apostle Eph. 5.2 Eph. 5.2 Let us love one a other as Christ hath loved us and given himselfe a ransome for us where hee shewes not only the manner how wee should love one another As Christ hath loved us but the motive how he loved us hee suffered for us he loved us and gave himselfe a ransome for us Secondly as it was the love of Christ to give himselfe so it was the love of God that gave Christ as Christ saith it of himselfe so hee speakes it likewise of his Father Ioh. 3.16 God so loved the world Joh. 3.16 that hee gave his only begotten Sonne c. Wee must not thinke that God then begins to love us when God is actually reconciled to us in his Sonne so some conceive but amisse if I be not deceived and mistaken for saith the Apostle Rom. 5.18 Rom. 5.18 Hee loved us when wee were enemies God loves us not only when wee are friends when wee are actually reconciled by the death of his Sonne but when wee were enemies S. Aug. Psal 113. So saith S. Austin upon Psal 110. God loves us when hee hates us hee loves us

Blasphemer and what you will saving what they should and so that he suffered death for his owne sinnes and transgressions This But checks and controlls the conceit that the world had of Christ Which being so The deduction hence in a word is that What Christ suffered on earth either torments of body or anguish of soule it was not for any sinne or fault of his owne that hee was guiltie of personally Wee looking to outward appearance wee judged him smitten of God and afflicted but this But hath the force of a negation there was no such thing I say whatsoever Christ suffered on earth whether torment of body or anguish of soule it was not for any sinne of his owne This the Apostle Saint Peter witnesseth 1 Pet. 3.18 Christ suffered once for sinne 1 Pet. 3.18 saith the Apostle The just for the unjust that hee might bring us to God Where the Apostle Saint Peter having said that Christ suffered for sinne lest some should misconceive that Christ suffered for his owne sinne hee prevents this cavill and removes the ground of suspition The just for the unjust If Christ had suffered for his owne sinnes hee had not suffered as just but as unjust as a malefactour hee had suffered the punishment due to his owne transgressions so saith the Apostle 1 Pet. 2.20 21 22. Exhorting those to whom hee wrote 1 Pet. 2.20 21 22. to patient suffering and induring of injuries though undeserved hee sets before them the patterne of Christ who though hee had committed no evil and there was no guile found in his mouth yet when he was reviled reviled not againe when hee suffered yet notwithstanding hee reproached not but committed himselfe to God that judgeth righteously Marke though hee had committed no evill nor there was no guile found in his mouth there was no sinne or demerite of his owne that he should deserve such punishments And this is one difference that the Apostle observes Heb. 7.26 betweene the high Priests under the Law and our high Priest Christ they offered first for their owne sinnes and then for the sinnes of the people but Christ had no need to offer sacrifice for his owne sinnes for he had none but we have such a high Priest and such a one it became us to have as is holy and undefiled separate from sinners And this is the reason likewise why the Prophet Isay in this Chapter assigning the true reason of Christs suffering hee repeats and inculcates these and the like phrases Hee bore our infirmities and carried our sorrewes hee was broken for our iniquities and wounded for our transgressions and with his stripes wee are healed Still hee layes all the fault and blame upon our selves but hee doth not so much as mention any fault in himselfe whereby hee did deserve to die And indeed how could hee suffer for his owne sinne that was free from all sinne So saith the Apostle 2 Cor. 5.21 2 Cor. 5.21 Hee was made sinne for us that knew no sinne Hee knew no sinne that is hee did practise none he committed none for in spirituall things wee are said to know no more good then wee practise so Christ is said to know no evill that is hee practised it not Hee made him sinne for us that knew no sinne Hee was free from originall sinne in his birth and conception And hee was free from actuall sinnes in his life and conversation First hee was free from Originall sinne in his birth and conception For whereas there are two parts of originall sinne First the imputation of the guilt of that actuall sinne of Adam in eating the forbidden fruit Secondly the corruption or perversnesse derived and propagated to us from our first Parents Christ was free from both First Hee was free from the guilt of Adams sinne though hee had his nature of Adam hee was a child of Adam but hee was not begotten by Adam not by a sonne of man the latter whereof is that that entitleth us to our first Parents transgression and makes it ours By one man sinne entred into the world c. Secondly for that corruption and perversnesse that followed on that transgression of the command of God Christ was free from this not by vertue of the Wombe that bare him as if the blessed Virgin Mary had beene free from sinne as Scotus affirmes upon the Third sentence distinct 26. Article 4. but hee was free from sinne by the supernaturall worke of the holy Ghost sanctifying and purging that substance of the Virgin whereof his body was framed from the common infection of our nature so that he is styled by the Angell Luke 1.75 Luk. 1.75 That holy thing by way of excellencie Secondly as Christ was free from originall so from actuall sinne as hee was free from Originall sinne in his birth and conception so he was free from actuall sinne in his life and conversation so in the ninth verse of this chapter Hee had done no violence there was no deceit in his mouth hee committed no evill as Saint Peter speakes On this ground Christ challengeth the Iewes Which of you can accuse mee of evill It is true they accused him and laid many crimes to his charge as what innocent was ever so happy as to be exempted and priviledged from unjust imputations but how slight they were you may judge by this in that the Iudge before whom he stood as prisoner at the barre accounted him acquitted though hee used no oratory but silence I find no sinne in this man If Christ had had any sinne of his owne hee could not have satisfied God for us hee might have quit scores with God for himselfe but for our hand-writing it had stood still Let this suffice to shew that what Christ suffred on earth in body or soule it was not for any sinne of his owne but for us not that hee stood personally guiltie But how then could it stand with the justice of God to suffer him to die Obiect if hee did not deserve death for so wee find in Ezek. 18.20 so runnes the menace Ezek. 18.20 if Christ did not sinne how could God suffer him to indure the punishment due to sinne I answer briefly Christ is to bee considered in a double respect Answ either as a private person or as a publike person standing in our roome and stead If Christ bee considered as a private person so it is true it could not stand with the justice of God to suffer him to die because hee was not guiltie of inherent personall sinne and shall not the Iudge of all the world doe right But consider Christ as a publike person standing in our roome and stead taking on him the guilt and burden of our transgressions so the justice of God required that hee should die because though hee were not guiltie of any personall sinne yet hee was so guiltie as our sinnes were translated and imputed to him and so it was requisite hee should die Looke

surfeiting ibid. Many wayes of sufeiting 186 Treatise 4. SEeking things aboue enforced 196 1. In respect of God 197 2. In respect of our selves 204 Things above what 209 Why so called 211 Seeking What. 212 Propos Those that are risen with Christ must seeke the things above 213 Conditions requisite in seeking 3. 214 Meanes of seeking 218 Signes of seeking 223 Use Exhortation to seeking 226 FINIS THE GATE TO HAPPINESSE ROM 6.8 Now if we be dead with Christ we beleeve that we shall also live with him Scope of the words THe aime and scope of the Apostle in this place is by the occasion of an objection proposed verse 1. to shew the necessary coherence of sanctification with justification The objection is this If where sinne bath abounded grace doth much more abound which the Apostle S. Paul affirmes in the former Chapter treating of free justification by grace then saith the carnalist let us continue in sinne that grace may abound this is the objection To this the Apostle answers two wayes First by way of detestation Secondly by way of confutation By way of detestation in the beginning of the second verse God forbid farre be it from such gracious premises to make so dangerous and pestilent an inference What saith he shall we continue in sinne that grace way abound God forbid Secondly by way of confutation and that by a double argument answerable to the two parts of Sanctification Mortification and Vivification both of them pregnant and full of sinewes to enforce and presse the cause and conclusion in hand The first argument is thus such as are dead to sinne with Christ they cannot wilfully and wilingly live and continue in sinne but such as are justified from their sinnes by Christ they are dead to sinne with Christ therefore such as are justified by Christ they cannot live and continue in sinne The Minor proposition the Apostle proves First by the efficacie of baptisme vers 4. and 5. and by conformities Christ in his crucifying and sufferings verse 6. The second argument as a consequent and dependent upon the former is thus Those that are quickned by Christ to a new life of grace they cannot willingly and wilfully continue in sinne but those that are justified by Christ are quickned to a new life of grace they cannot therefore willingly and wilfully continue in sinne The Minor proposition the Apostle proves thus those that are dead with Christ are quickned to a new life of grace Such as are justified by Christ are dead with Christ therefore they are quickned to a new life with Christ and therefore they cannot continue in sinne The Major proposition is in the words of the Text Now if wee be dead with Christ wee beleeve that we shall also live with him You see the Logicke and argumentation of the Apostle which words being a proposition and argument hupotheticall observe in them two parts First an Antecedent according to the law of such propositions And then a Consequent Or more properky one thing supposed and another thing inferred First the thing supposed in the former part of the verse that wee are dead with Christ The other inferred in the latter part wee beleeve that we shall also live with him More particularly you may please to observe these foure parts First the method and order of the parts first we must be dead with Christ before we can live with him If wee be dead with Christ wee beleeve that wee shall also live with him Wee must first die with Christ before wee can live with him Secondly the inseparable connexion and conjunction and union of these two though the one goe before yet the other followes inseparably and unavoydably as Iacob tooke Esau by the heele In the latter part Now if we be dead with Christ we beleeve that we shall also live with him there is the conjunction of these two Thirdly the assurance of this connexion or conjunction If we be dead with Christ wee beleeve we shall live with him Fourthly and lastly the cause and ground as of the two former so of the latter both of our death with Christ and of our life with Christ it is Christ Christ is the cause of both If we be dead with Christ that is as Aquinas rightly interprets the place through or by the vertue of Christ Wee beleeve that wee shall also live with him or bee raised to the life or grace by the same vertue Thus you have the parts If wee be dead with Christ wee beleeve that we shall also live with him First of the order and method of the parts which is the first part or proposition Wee must first die with Christ before we can live with him To be dead with Christ what To be dead with Christ is in imitation or conformitie with Christ to be dead to sinne as Christ dyed for sinne So we are sayd to dye with Christ when we dye to sinne Now we are sayd to be dead to sinne when sinne is dead in us when the command and dominion of sinne is broken downe when the power and force of it is enfeebled when we doe what we can that sinne may not have any vigour or power or command no nor quiet being in us then sinne is sayd to be properly dead in us Now we must not conceive that as long as we live sinne will utterly and totally dye The reason is this it is a comparison of St. Basil saith hee it is with sinne S. Basil and with the corruption of nature as it is with the Ivie and the wall Simile when the Ivie is fastned and incor porated into the wall a man may cut the boughes and branches but hee can never roote it out except hee pull downe the wall As Ivie is to the wall so is sin and corruption to our nature it is so scrued and got into our nature that so long as we live so long as this house of clay stands wee cannot utterly roote it out wee may mortifie and kill it in some measure but when this house of clay shall be demolished and dissolved then sinne shall be utterly extinguished I say then we must not conceive sinne to be so dead as that it hath utterly no life in it but it is sayd to be dead in a double respect First it is dead Civilly Secondly it is dead Naturally It is a rule among Civillians he that it a servant is halfe a dead man The reason is because hee is no longer at his owne command but what he is he is that he is as hee is inspired and animated by the command of his master So sinne is said to bee dead because it is made a servant it is forced to undergoe the yoake to be subject to the Spirit of grace therefore it is sayd to bee dead civilly Secondly it is sayd to bee dead naturally too the reason is this because howsoever there bee some life left in it yet it hath its deaths wound that wil

Selected quad for the lemma: law_n

Text snippets containing the quad