should be idle but so he is not saith Bellarmine First because he alwayes ministers strength and grace by which wee doe good works Secondly hee purgeth our daily and lighter sinnes and his blood cleanseth vs from all sinnes Or if through transgression of the law we fall away from our state of righteousnes he neuer thelesse is stil the propitiation for our sins and reconciles vs not only seuen times but seueÌ„ty times seuen times to his father if conuerted by his grace we addresse our selues to serious repentance Therfore we make not CHRIST an idle mediatour in saying the Law may be fulfilled but our aduersaries truly make his benefits vneffectuall when they teach that the excellency of his obedience could not effect that the iustification which is by the Law should bee fulfilled in vs. Whatsoeuer he thought it was safest for him to professe as hee hath written because the Trent Fathers for conclusion of that session accurse all that should say their resolutions in this point did rather disparage then set foorth the excellencie of CHRISTS sacrifice or the true woorth of his merits But the more mercifull Bellarmine makes his God the readier to forgiue our frequent trespasses the greater stil is their former mockery seeing euery time they repeat that petition they implicitely yet necessarily include the appurtenances Lord make vs such as wee shall not need of thy forgiuenesse The excesse of diuine Maiesty in respect of princely dignity presupposed their mockery of God in suing for restauration of grace after relapses into mortall sinne may for the quality be resembled by imagination of some great fauourite in the Court after many bountifull rewards for little or no seruice falling to rob or steale and lastly crauing pardon in these or like tearmes I haue grieuously offended against your Crowne and dignity but by your wonted grace I beseech you bestow as good preferment on me as before I had and amends shall quickly bee made for all the wrongs I haue done vnto my fellow subiects you shall not finde matter of death in me againe so long as your bounty towards me lasts that I shall not commit some petty sinnes of wantonnesse quarrelling drinking swearing I hope your highnesse will not expect for these are not against your Law but besides it The insolency of this imagination in a malefactour could an earthly Prince knowe the heart whence it issued would make his former offence in it self and course of common iustice meritorious of death altogether vncapable of mercy otherwise easie to haue beene obtained And is it either lesse exclusiue from Gods fauour or more prouocatiue of his seuerity to beg such grace at his hands as shall wipe out all former reckonings where with he could charge vs or hauing promised sincere obedience to the Law to elude the Lawgiuer with that distinction without which Bellarmine thinkes our Writers arguments to proue the fulfilling of the Law impossible can hardly be answered They saith he which grant as Vega doth veniall sinnes to be against the Law are enforced to hold that to keepe the Law is onely possible in as much as onely the greater part of it may bee kept whence the denomination is indefinitely attributed to the whole But what can they say to that of Iames. Hee that keepeth the whole Law and offendeth in one point is guilty of all The solide answere therefore in his iudgement is that veniall sinnes without which we doe not liue are not sinnes simply but imperfectly and in a sort neither are they against the Law but besides the Law Such as first did apply this distinction to that purpose for which the moderne Romanist now misuseth it might perhaps be in part excused by the barbarousnesse of the times wherein they liued and their ignorance in Scriptures But wee haue cause to feare that Bellarmines generall skill and knowledge in them vvas punished by GOD vvith particular grosse and palpable ignorance or blindnesse rather in thinking this quiâ—ke of wit should glue together such Oracles of the Apostles as without it would mightily iarre and start asunder As that of Iames late cited He that offends in one mortally is guilty of all and this other In many things we al offend 1. venially or these two of S. Iohn He that is borne of God sinneth not If we say we haue no sin we deceiue our selues So doubtlesse they do and mightily mistake both these great Apostles meaning that thinke any in this should be so righteous as not to stand in neede of Gods fauour for absolution from sins committed against his Law but of their meaning in the Chapter following 9. These discussions may informe the Reader that Bellarmines conclusion of this controuersie wherein hee may seeme vnto the vnobseruant to attribute somewhat to Gods mercies in the businesse of iustification after grace infused was but like the first inuitation of an Italian onely for fashion sake For if his authority could haue moued any of his profession after fulnesse of grace to haue tasted the louing kindnesse of the Lord he could not be ignorant that the Trent Councell had shut the doore vpon them It is the safest way saith he * to put our whole trust in Gods mercies VVhy so because there is no trust or confidence to be put in our owne good workes or fruits of grace No rather because it is more easie to grow proud of our deeds then to be assured of our sincerity in doing them But if neither safe it be to trust in them nor by his doctrine to any purpose without them to trust in Gods mercies hee hath left his Romane Catholikes in a miserable case VVhat is it then they can hope or desire Gods mercies should doe for them To remit their sinnes How By not imputing them this is all they can condemne in vs. VVhat then to set heauen open vnto them without remission of sinnes or iustification This is more then can be laid to any heritickes charge none euer liued but granted iustification to bee a necessary gate through which all that haue sinned must enter into heauen It remaines then the onely ground of all hope or trust a Romanist can haue of any good from Gods mercies must be his precedent perswasion or beliefe of absolute and perfect righteousnesse either now inhabiting his soule or hereafter to be obtayned That is hee must trust God one time or other will be so mercifull to him as he shall not stand in neede of his mercie at the houre of death 10. He that wold clearly conuince the Romish church or her childreÌ„ of a capitall crime vsually obiected by our writers shold begin w th the vertual intentioÌ„ of the priest by rigid positions of their late writers most necessarily required to the effectual working of the Sacraments for that euidently breedeth doubt whervnto if we adioyne this absolute necessity of compleat habitual grace inherent for remission of sins it openly condemnes the Trent Councell it selfe for nursing
or properties of true Faith Loue Fidelitie and Confidence with the manner of their resultance from it p 100. CHAP. 11 Of the diuerse acceptions of faith in Scriptures or Fathers of the Romanist pernicious error concerning the nature of it and charity whereby his in aginarie workes of merit necessarily become either dead apish or polluted p 110 SECTION 2. Of immature perswasions concerning mens present estate in grace with the meanes to rectifie or preuent them of the right vse of faith and other spirituall graces Pag. 135. CHAP. 10 The generall heads or springs of hypocriticall perswasions with briefe rules for their preuention p 136 CHAP. 2 That our Assent vnto the first principles of Christianitie by profession of which the saith of auncient Christians was vsually tryed may bee to our owne apprehension exceeding strong and yet our beliefe in Christ no better then the Heathens that oppugned them that it is a matter of more difficultie to be a true Christian now then in the Primitiue Church did we rightly examine the strength â—pâ—r faith not by such points as theirs was tried but by resisting popâ—â—ar customes or resolutions of our times actully opposite to the most essentiall and vtmost as Idolatrie is to the remote or generall differences of Christian faith p 143 CHAP. 3 That we moderne Christians may hate Christ as much as wee do the memory of such Iewes as crucified him albeit readie if we were called to formall triall rather to die then openly to deny him or his Gospell what meanes are surest for iust triall whether wee be better affected towards him then these Iewes were p 163 CHAP. 4 That the fruits of righteousnesse if but of one or few kindes argue the stocke whence they spring to be either imperfect or vnsound of the danger that may come by partiality in the practise of precepts alike diuine or from difformitie of zeale that our Assent to generalities oftimes appeares greater to our selues then indeed it is from our pronenesse or eager desires to transgresse in some particulars p 174. CHAP. 5 That true faith is the soule of good workes that it equally respects all the Commandements of God and can admit no dispensation for non-performance of necessarie duties p 192 CHAP. 6 Of difficulties arising from the former discourses in the Protestants doctrine of iustification by faith without workes That faith is as immediatly aâ—t to doe good workes of euery kinde as to iustifie Of the diuerse accepâ—ions of Iustification That the iustification by workes mentioned by S. Iames is proposed as subordinate to S Pauls iustification by faith without works The true reconcilement of these two Apostles speeches contrarie only in appearance from the contrariety of their seuerall ends or intentions p 206 CHAP. 7 Of the differences betwixt vs and the Romish Church concerning Iustification or the right vse or measure of grace or righteousnesse inherent p 229 CHAP. 8 How far the Lawe must be fulfilled in this life of the regiment of grace of the permanencie of Iustification what interruptions it may admit how these must be repaired or in what sense it may be sayd to be reiterated That euerie sinne is against Gods Law though euery sinne not incompatible with the state of grace p 253 CHAP. 9 That firmly to beleeue Gods mercies in Christ is the hardest point of seruice in Christian warfare That our confidence in them can bâ— no greater then our fidelity in the practise of his coÌ„mandements That meditation vpon Christs last appearance is the surest method for grounding true confidence in him p 272 SECTION 3. Of the right plantation of Faith page 278. CHAP. â— That Christian Faith although immediately infused by God without any cooperation of man doth not exclude but rather more necessarily require precedent humane endeauours for the attaining of it p 279 CHAP. 2 That circumspect following the rules of Scripture is more auaileable for attaining true faith then the practise of morall precepts for producing morall habits That there may be naturall perswasions of spirituall truths and morall desires of spirituall good both right in their kinde though nothing worth in themselues but onely capable of better because not hypocriticall p 283 CHAP. 3 Of the fundamentall rule of Christianity to forsake all and denie our selues That the sincere practise thereof is a method more admirable and compendious for the attainment of faith then any Artist could prescribe the principles of Christianity being supposed That the want partly of instruction in the duties contained in it partly of solemne and publicke personall protestation for their performance is the principall cause of hypocrisie and infidelity p 282 CHAP. 4 That the obseruance of the former rule is most easie vnto men of meaner gifts vnto whom in this respect Gods mercy is greater then if their guiftes were better and yet his mercy iustly to bee esteemed greatest towards such as haue most excellent guifts by nature p 299 CHAP. 5 Our Sauiours Parables especially those Mat 13. Mark 4. Luk 8 most soueraigne rules for the plantation and growth of faith of vnfruitfull hearers resembled by the high-way side and stonie ground with briefe caueats for altering their disposition p 306 CHAP. 6 Of that temper which in proportion answeres to thornie ground of the deceitfulnesse of riches how difficult a matter it is to haue them and not to trust in them The reason why most rich men of our times neuer mistrust themselues of putting this trust in Mammon p 310 CHAP. 7 Of the antipathy betweene true faith and ambition or selfe-exaltation That the one resembles our Sauiours the other Sathans disposition Briefe admonitions for auoiding such dangers as growe from other branches of voluptuous life p. 317. CHAP. 8 Of the goodnesse or honesty of heart required by our Sauiour in fruitfull hearers of the ordinarie progresse from faith natural to spirituall and the different esteeme of diuine truths or precepts in the regenerate man and him that is not but sincerely desires to bee such vacancy to attend all intimations of the spirit to be sought after by all meanes possible That alienation of our chiefe desires from their corrupt obiects is much auaileable for purchase of the inestimable pearle p. 331. CHAP. 9 That faith cannot excercise it soueraigntie our affections or desires vntil â—t be seated in the hart with brief admonitions for bringing it into his throne p. 346. Places of Scripture expounded or illustrated by Obseruation in the Treatise following ⸪ Out of the Olde Testament GENESIS Cha. 22 Verse 2 TAke now thine onely sonne Isaac whom thou louest c. Section 1. chap. 7. parag 5. Verse 12 Sect. 1. chap. 8. par 9. EXODVS Cha. 10 Verse 8 9 10 Goe and serue the Lord your God but who are they that shall goe c. Sect. 2. c. 8. par 5. Verse 26 Therefore our cattell also shall goe with vs c. neither do wee know how we shall serue the Lord vntill we come thither ibid.
a foile and seeing they can hardly finde others of life and conuersation much fowler they purpose vnto themselues this difformity or disproportion in such opinions as are indifferent inrespect of their delights and therefore easie to bee embraced with ioy as a salue vnto their sore consciences apt for to breed such a perswasion of faith or grace inherent as the Pharisee had with whom vpon this conceit they say Lord wee thanke thee that wee are not as other men are not as these ê“eeuish Schismatiques or monstrous and mishapen Hereticks Others out of the like humour againe will bitterly inueigh against vncharitablenesse from which indeed they are free in respect of their owne crimmous consorts but yet thinke it no small point of zeale to censure religious Preachers most vncharitably for reproouing the vnfruitfull workes of darknesse But as was intimated the forme of this temptation is in diuers well minded the same Many if we respect that great aboundance God hath either blessed them with or permitted them to scrape together very defectiue in workes of charitie or deuotion albeit Leuyes reuenewes pay them tribute for this purpose will be more forward in frequenting religious assemblies or holy exercises then such as fructifie more by one howers conference with a true diuine or reading a religious treatise than they do by noting twenty sermons The true reason of this diformity is not alwaies perhaps not vsually as some not so obseruant of their owne temptations as they might be deeme from actuall dissimulation with the world and themselues or expresse purpose to vse religion onely in policie for a garment to couer their mis-shapennesse but rather from a secret working of the soule conscious of it eternall want and penury of works best pleasing God which she thus seekes to recompease by extraordinary diligence in such duties as shall not much displease herselfe or preiudice her sweet delights or alter her most familiar purposes Thus did the Iewes from whom this disease descends hope to repaire their want of mercie with multitude of sacrifices no lesse necessarily required by the lawe then sermons are by the Gospell And the stomacke when it either hath no solid food or is vnable to digest it wil naturally desire to fill it selfe though with water or such light meats as breed nought but winde The like aduantage hypocrisie oft gaines to strengthen it selfe by antedating indulgences to vnlawfull acts or delights vpon presumption of increasing faith by repentance 10. Who is he which now truely feareth God but calling his former thoughts to strict accompt will professe hee hath sometimes been indulgent to naturall desires or such pleasures as haue accompanied him from the cradle vpon hope his alacrity in doing good should by this relaxation be augmented or repaired Or would we be as obseruant of our demeanure toward God as we are of it towards men or their deportment toward vs we could not long remaine in ignorance that our Assent vnto generall principles of faith or future practises of duties enioyned doe oft-times appeare greater then indeed they are from our pronenesse inslantly to transgresse in some particulars which to prosecute without checke or incumbrance we hardly could without making our selues faire promises of reformation in time to come For apprehension or feare of defection either finall or totall cannot but curbe the vnruly appetites of flesh and blood in such as haue any touch of conscience or religion In these allurements we intreat our consciences as men intentiue vpon waighty businesse do cumbersome guests or importunate sollicitours if such as in ciuility they must respect making faire proffers they will bee for them against another time to be quit of them for the present Nor do they alwaies make shewe of more than they meane albeit when the heat of businesse is allaid they be more loath to be vrged with performance of what they promised then they were to promise The reason in this and the former case is the same eager desire of prosecuting what they had in hand without interruption or delay made them more hearty then otherwise they would haue been in their proffers because the vnkindnesse which might be taken or vnciuill tearmes that might grow vpon an vncourteous dismission might breed vexation of mind or vnaptnesse to dispatch their instant affaires In like sort many put off their Creditors with earnest protestations and serious purposes to giue them contentment ere long but if contrary occasions in the meane time meete them they take vp with their promises and recall their purposes both now are conditionall They would bee as willing as any man liuing if they had it and can heartily wish they had wherwith to giue euery man full satisfaction The same protestations we vsually make vnto our God and relent from them vpon like occasions when new temptations do assault vs we request him as Naaman did to be mercifull vnto vs in some one or all or if not simply for the sinne yet for the act at the present and perhaps vow double diligence in his lawes for times ensuing yea oftentimes apprehend this experience of our transgression and the sting of sinne thence arising as a motiue to make vs more earnest solicitors for grace When as God knowes by spending the time allotted vs for repentance in such trifling pleasures wee cast our selues more and more behinde hand entring further into Satan that cruell extortioners bands alwaies disenabling our selues as much to resist the next temptation as our delight hath been in yeelding to this At length we come to desperate debtors last protestations If we could a base our selues in stooping vnto a vulgar life or abstaine from such pleasures as nature and education hath made vs more capable of then others are we could be as willing to performe anie Christian duty as the best that now wee are more backward then most are must not be thought to proceed from any lesse esteeme of CHRIST and his kingdome but from multitude of great and waightie occasions to withdrawe vs. Some againe perswade themselues they beare great inward affection towards God but yet whiles they outwardly transgresse his lawes or at least shew not their loue vnto him in the practise the blame must be laid vpon others which indiscreetly crosse them let them haue their wils and it shall be made manifest vnto the world they are both as willing and able to doe God any seruice as the most forward professor lluing This is a temptation incident to braue minds so euery proud man thinkes his owne paralel to Caesars protestations of loue and loyaltie to Rome when he came in armes against it for thus hee deifies it amongst the other gods Summique ô Numinis instar Roma â—aue caeptis non te furialibus armis Persequor en adsum victor terraquemarique Caesar vhique tuus liceat modò nunc quoque miles Ille erit ille nocens qui me tibi fecerat hostem Thine aide ô Rome'mongst greatest gods I
operation become spiritually vitall Lay apart all filthinesse and superfluity of naughtinesse and receiue with meekenesse the ingrafted word which is able to saue your soules This was the word of faith which was to fructifie in their deeds wherefore he saith Be ye doers of the word not hearers onely deceiuing your owne selues And doers of it many of them were in part whence they grounded a conceipt of holinesse bringeth forth as it seemes either contemptuous or vncharitable censures of others To this disease he applies that medicine If any man among you seeme to be religious and bridleth not his tongue but deceiueth his owne heart this mans religion is vaine And seeing they held such intertainements as we speake of before because glorious in the worlds eye good and acceptable in the sight of God of whose glory and good liking they conceiued according to the customes best approued amongst men he further giueth them these imitable characters of his goodnes Pure religion and vndefiled before God and the father is this to visit the fatherlesse and the widowes in their afflictions and to keepe himselfe vnspotted from the world My brethren haue not the faith of our Lord IESVS CHRIST the Lord of glory with respect of persons This patterne Moses long before had drawne from Gods owne presence for his people to worke by circumcise therefore the foreskinne of your hearts that was to be vnspotted of the world For the Lord your God is God of Gods and Lord of Lords the Lord of glory a great God and a mighty and a terrible which accepteth no person nor taketh reward which doth right vnto the fatherlesse and widow and loueth the stranger in giuing him foode and rayment loue ye therefore the stranger for ye were all strangers in the land of Egypt 4. Want of conformity to this rule abundantly argues the leuity of their beliefe vnto such generall truths as they acknowledged The old Romane prouerbe of faith passiue or fidelitie fidem nemo perdit nisi qui non habet is more appliable to faith actiue or truely Christian No man can haue the faith of Iesus the Lord of glory with respect of persons but he that hath not the faith of Christ Iesus For he that saith he belieues CHRIT and keeps not his commaundements or rather altogether inuerts them by costly inuitations of the rich and mighty without due respect of the poore and needy is by Saint Iohns rule a liar Yet this preposterous respect of persons which is so incompatible with true faith in CHRIST as formally contrary to it patterne it was as our Apostle tels vs that made them transgressors of the Law euen whilest they did things commaunded by the Law But if ye haue respect of persons ye commit sinne and are conuinced by the Law as transgressors The head or first fountaine as well of these erroneous perswasions as of difformities in their works was want of firme assent vnto the diuine attributes or vnto the soueraigne will and pleasure of the Lawgiuer For the Apostle to prooue that assertion which containeth the reason of the former Whosoeuer shall keep the whole law and yet offends in one point he is guilty of all giueth vs that golden and metaphisicall rule by which this whole discourse hath beene framed He that said thou shalt not commit adultery said also thou shalt not kill now if thou commit no adultery yet if thou kill thou art become a transgressor of the Law a positiue or actuall transgressor by this act of murther a negatiue transgressor or non obseruer of the Law in his abstinence from adultery Nor could his supposed chastity or restraint of lust be a Christian action or truely vitall because not inspired by faith or firme assent vnto Gods will or commaundement whose soueraignty once faithfully acknowledged and established in his thougths would haue beene a like potent to haue restrained naturall inclination to murther or bloodshed acts altogether as displeasing and contrary to the will of God Quando serâ—us ex domini sui iust â—â— ea facit tantummodo quae vult facere non dominicam voluntatem implet sed suam saith Saluianus That a seruant goes cheerefully to the faire when he is bid or to supply his Maisters roome at a feast is no good argument of his fidelitie trust or diligence to doe his Masters will Many forward enough vpon these or like occasions commanded to goe a shorter errand vpon more waighty businesse when he had as good a desire or opportunity to sport or feast themselues at home would by their backewardnesse or grumbling bewray they had not learned to submit their wils vnto their masters or to preferre his businesse before their sport without which the doing of what is enioined is but an impotent and lame obedience f If a seruant say vnto his Master I will not doe as it pleaseth thee though afterwards hee doe it hee shall displease him that nourisheth him Knaues and catchpoles oft doe what the Law requires should be done yet are no true obseruers of the Law because this seruice they performe not out of faith and loialty to the Prince or Lawgiuer but in desire of gaine or some priuate respect alwaies as powerfull to make some obserue as others to transgresse paenall statutes If an Ambassador should transact such points of his instructions as make iointly for his owne aduancement neglecting others as necessary for the state his negligence in the latter would impeach his fidelity in the former albeit he did that which his Prince would haue done For he did it not because it was the Princes will it should be done but because his owne will was to haue some good done to him And perhaps one and the same humour of ambition feare or the like might cause his diligence in the one and negligence in the other and so may one and the same affection cause a man to obserue one commaundement and transgresse another But he alone obeyes Gods commaundements that wholly submits his will to Gods will that doth what God commaunds because he belieues he did commaund it that auoids what God forbids out of beliefe that God forbids it or because he knowes it to be displeasant to his goodnesse God commands all without exception to glorifie his name both in body and spirit as well as to honour father and mother or to abstaine from stealth Many can stand at open defiance with the world for any touch of disobedience in these latter which yet if out of faith they did obserue they would be as chast of their bodies as honest of their hands and equalize their diligence in duties towards their parents with deuotion towards Gods vnto whom zealous and religious praiers from out a chast and pure minde are more pleasant then honoring of father and mother then abstinance from theft and coozenage Faultinesse or negligence in the former argues a faulty diligence in the
IESVS CHRIST the righteous and he is the propitiation for our sinnes In what manner onely as he is the meritorious cause or fountaine of grace whereby wee are immediately and throughly cleansed No rather as he is righteous and by interposition of his eternall sacrifice euen till this day as immediate a cause of our pardon from all sinnes whether past or present as it was of our generall reconcilement while it was offered Nor did he die to procure vs grace wherby we might become righteous and pure in his fathers sight but gaue vs grace that we might be purified by his death and passion yet if sinnes mortall as well as veniall to vse our aduersaries language bee comprehended in the saying last cited Bellarmines reconciliation of the former words if wee say that we haue no sinne with this other vvhosoeuer is borne of God sinneth not is palpably false 5. But if his be amisse it will be expected we reconcile them a right and so we may with as great ease as perspicuity In the latter then he speakes of habituall sin or such indulgence to transgressions as S. Iames makes liable to breach of the whole law for by sinne it is euident he includes as much as he had said in the beginning of that discourse whosoeuer committeth sinne transgresseth also the Lawe Why is there anie sinne which in the Protestants doctrine is not a transgression of the lawe or is it possible a man should goe against the commandement and not transgresse it But if some sinnes there be as Roman Catholiques teach onely besides the lawe in doing them we doe not transgresse the Lawe but rather pretergresse or goe besides it Yet seeing the Law-giuers will was that we should do the lawe not onely heare it much lesse goe besides it there is no pretergression of it but is directly against the Law giuers will otherwise a seruants negligence should not bee against his masters will but besides it For tell mee O yee fooles and blinde whether is more onely to omit the good deedes of the lawe or to commit such as your selues acknowledge to bee besides it Though the matter of omission may be â—arre greater yet for the forme of the action whence the denomination of opposition must be taken no sinne of omission can be so properly said to be against the Law as the least positiue sinne or transgression we can imagine Hee that commits any thing disagreeable to the Lawe doth omit what is commaunded by the lawe and somewhat more and therefore doth more properly goe against the lawe then hee which onely omits what is commaunded But it is vsually the nature of hypocrisie to place either sanctity or impietie rather in the matter or outward act than in the heart or affection Farre otherwise are we taught by the spirit of truth that it is the heart which God requireth No matter of sinne can be so light but is if the heart be set vpon it in the issue deadly and excludes from mercie scarce any obiect so bad as that the bare assent vnto it without delight or custome is vtterly incompatible with the habit of grace Nor doth Saint Iohn in the former places seeming contrarie suppose any difference in the act or matter of sinne but onely in the heart or habite of the sinner Euery one transgresseth the lawe in what sinne soeuer but euery transgression makes not a man a law-breaker or transgressour this denomination is not absolutely giuen but from a greater inclination or delight in doing euill then doing good And it is cleere that Saint Iohn when hee sayth he that is borne of God sinneth not vseth the selfe-same syllogisticall terme he had done before in that phrase 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he that committeth sinne Now the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 according to the Hebraisme which he followes imports not the act or operation onely but the habit or rather more then habit and the whole phrase 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is as much as the Latine operarius iniquitatis one that maketh a trade of sinne or professeth iniquitie whose seruice is altogether incompatible with the profession or hope of a Christian And this was the conclusion our Apostle was in both places to inferre as hauing taught immediatly before euery one that hath this hope of being the Sonne of God doth purge himselfe as he is pure and in habite becomes like vnto him as on the contrarie which is the Apostles inference likewise he that committes sinne 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 resembles his father the diuell whose chiefe delight is in doing mischiefe It may be a Romane Catholicke will sooner belieue if we send him vnto Maldonat who commenting vpon the like speech 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thus farre beares witnesse vnto the truth we teach that the hebrew phrase aimes rather at the habit then the act that to work or doe iniquity is as much as to be an artificer or craftesmaster of iniquity 2. But wee receiue not the record of man there is another that beareth witnesse of it euen our Sauiour from whose mouth Saint Iohn learned both the matter and phrase of that discourse Verily saith he to the Iewes whosoeuer committeth sinne is the seruant of sinne and the seruant abideth not in the house for euer but the son abideth for euer If the sonne therefore shall make you free ye shall be free indeed from the raigne of sinne not from all acts of sinne Hence did Saint Iohn take that lesson You know that he was manifested to take away our sinnes and in him is no sinne To be altogether without sinne then was his peculiar but Whosoeuer abideth in him sinneth not Not at all So he should not need any aduocation but he is no worker of iniquity nor doth he sin as Diuels doe for whose sinnes CHRIST was no propitiation That so the Apostle meant is apparent from the paralell vse of the same words immediately after reciprocally changed Hee that committeth sinne is of the diuell for the diuell sinneth from the beginning that is hath continued his apostacy or trade of sinne euer since his fall For this purpose tâ—e sonne of God was manifested that he might destroy the workes of the diuell What were these Delight in sinne wilfull indulgence to transgressions and such vnrelenting opposition to the truth proposed as did conuince the Iewes by our Sauiours verdict in the place last cited to be the sonnes of the diuell yee are of your father the diuell and the lusts of your father ye will doe he was a murtherer from the beginning and abode not in the truth because there is no truth in him When he speaketh a lie he speaketh of his owne for he is a lier and the father of lies And because I tell you the truth ye beleeue me not yet which of you can rebuke me of sinne His disciples they might because the sonnes of men but in that there
rather morall then meerely speculatiue nor can wee euer vnderstand them a right but we must vnderstand them as good to vs. But though so to vnderstand any obiect be the cleerest and best â—â—ration or definition the most acute follower Aquinas hath can giue of will or volition yet vnto many not much addicted vnto either it will I doubt seeme a doctrine new and strange that we should will whatsoeuer we vnderstand to be good to vs. 5. But Truth I hope shall not be worse entertained by the ingenious and courteous Reader because a stranger Rather then it should it shall learne the common language after some briefe aduertisements for auoiding the errors thence occasioned or for discouering the originall of the former vnnecessary distinction which doubtlesse was for want of another more needfull betwixt our intellection or approbation of good whilest simply considered in it selfe and whilest compared either with some other more familiar good we must forgoe or some euill which would befall vs if we should continue or accomplish our former choise or approbation For as a candle though as truly bright as visible remaines only visible and rather obscure then bright while actually compared with the mid-day Sunne so our vnwillingnesse to purchase the good which we late approued appearing most cleere and euident from actuall refusall of it and free choise of the contrarie when we come to examine the termes or conditions vpon which it is profered doth quite ouershadow and drowne all former acts of our will or desire to haue it as simply considered and leaues only a conceit of it as true in the braine Yet that both are properly acts of the will or desires is most apparant in matters of secular vse or commodity For euery man knowes it is one thing to desire a commodity simply another to accept it at such a rate A mans vnwillingnesse to giue fiue hundred pound for a Farme doth not argue his vnwillingnesse to haue it gratis or if hee perfectly knew another purchase to be as well worth a thousand his willingnesse would be the same to haue it for fiue hundred as to haue the former gratis Thus many diuine truths are in our first apprehensions assented vnto as good and therefore truly willed whilest simply considered which yet we euidently refuse or will when we come to question about their price And this later act obliterating all impression of the former we vsually appropriate that vnto the vnderstanding though as much belonging vnto the wil. For I neuer knew any so idle or dissolute but would diuerse times wish hee were like some godly men whom he will not imitate and yet his wish to be like them is as proper an act of the will as his vnwillingnesse to imitate them this later notwithstanding wee vsually appropriate to the will though equally appertaining to the vnderstanding would wee make an equall comparison In the former we cannot but will diuine truths simply because simply considered wee vnderstand them as good in the later we do not therefore truly will them because wee doe not at the instant of choyce apprehend or vnderstand them as good being compared either with some entising sensuall good or much seared euill their prosecution would depriue vs of or procure vs. For as in the Article of euerlasting life by Gods assistance shall be shewed it is impossible the intellectiue nature should will or chuse a lesse good before a greater vnlesse there be a defect in such acts as are confined vnto the vnderstanding euen by such as distinguish it from the vvill as either the representation of the good in grosse acknowledged for greater is not formall distinct or cleere or because the approhension is dull or the impression weake Here it contents me that in this resolution I follow our Apostles forme of speech To will sayth he is present with mee but I finde no meanes to performe that which is good Thus he attributes the first act of the intellectiue nature whereby he assented vnto diuine truths contained in the lawe of God as good whilest simply considered vnto the will that afterwards hee effected not the purchase of what he so willed or approued hee ascribes not to anie peculiar defect in the will but to want of abilitie arising partly from the strength of sinnefull affection partly from weakenesse or insufficiencie of Assent or inclination of the minde as it comprehends both the will and vnderstanding 6. But is there no difference betweene Truth and Goodnesse no vse of any distinction betwixt the will and the vnderstanding Yes wee deny not all but had rather seeke a true difference betweene the one couple and a commodious distinction between the other Truth precisely considered includes a right apprehension or representation of the obiect whether actuall or possible As the representation of a winged horse or Hippocentaure or Chymera is false but of a winged Eagle true because the Eagle actually is the horse possibly cannot be such Although it were all one in respect of our ends or purposes whether the Eagle had fowre feet without feathers or the horse wings without feet Goodnesse as in common vse of speech it is made the peculiar obiect of the will besides the true representation of the obiect or conformitie of our imagination to it as hauing actuall or possible being includes a conueniencie in respect of vs or oppertunity of furthering our desires That properly is good which is agreeable that bad which is contrary that indifferent which is alike farre from contrarietie or agreement to such affection as we haue or should haue 7. Notwithstanding this distinction whilest we consider the whole latitude of obiects good and true Truth and Goodnesse in morall matters fully apprehended are in a sort coinsident altogether as vnseparable as sound and melody are in a pleasant consort to attentiue eares within iust distance And as of sounds perceiued by one and the same â—are some are dissonant some consonant some neither one nor other to the internal harmony or constitution of our soules so of truths assented vnto by one and the same intellectiue faculty some are pleasant some distastfull some indifferent in respect of our desires or morall purposes Such as are either indifferent in their nature or essence or vnto some certaine point or degree of apprehension we are sayd to apprehend or conceiue as meerely true And this apprehension or conceit we vsually appropriate to the vnderstanding not that it absolutely excludes euery degree or branch of goodnesse but all besides that immanent delight which floweth from the bare representation or is comprised within the impression made vpon the apprehensiue faculty neuer diffusing it selfe into any other part of the soule saue only that which first entertaines and embraceth the obiect vnapt either by internall nature or imperfect apprehension to make any further entrance As the bare quality of light though not accompanied with any other visible ornaments after long darknesse pleaseth the eye so doth
and fidelity nor can the nature of faith be better notified by the effect or property then if we define it to be a fidelity in all the seruice of God raised from a firme Assent vnto the former transcendent truths of his bountifull rewarding all that diligently seek him that it is alwaies better to obey him then man as shall further appeare from the discourses following And it is already partly shewed in our meditations vpon Ieremy that praiers thus made in faith are still effectuall for obtaining priuate remission of our sin comfort in the day of trouble or for auerting Gods heauy plagues or curses from any land or people if both the suppliants thus qualified hold due proportion with notorious delinquents for number and the frequency or feruency of their supplications with the continuance or stubbornnesse of the other sinnes But he alone truly praies in faith that can with constancy prosecute the right choice of means which faith doth make and faithfully practice such duties as it prescribes for attaining the end whereto it directs 13. If any of you lacke wisedome sayth Saint Iames let him aske of God that giueth to all men liberally and vpbraideth not and it shall bee giuen him But let him aske in faith nothing wauering for bee that wauereth is like a waue of the sea driuen with the winde and tossed For let not that man thinke he shall receiue any thing of the Lord. Why Because he praies not in faith but is double minded and vnstable in all his waies In this doublnesse of mind or distraction of the soule as the word imports doth hypocrisie in his language that knowes the heart and minde properly consist For to pretend or promise one thing and wittingly and expresly though in the secrets of our owne hearts to intend another is in scripture-phrase an act of Atheisme or infidelity An hypocrite hee is in the same dialect that assents vnto the meanes of mans saluation as truely good whiles simply considered but disesteemes them in the actuall choice wherein contrary desires or affections vnrenounced vsurpe a negatiue voice or rather make a maior part of his owne soule against him so as he cannot make good his former promise with his whole Assent From this competition betweene beliefe of spirituall truths and carnall delights or pleasure both challenging full interest in one and the same soule doth that doublenesse whereof S. Iames speak arise And the vnconstancy or wauering of an hypocrite may best be resembled by a Polypragmaticall temper desirous to hold good correspondencie with contrary factions hence often enforced to shuffle from such promises as hee meant to performe when he made them but considered not how farre hee had beene engaged by former obligements or protestations from which being challenged by the aduerse party hee cannot â—â—inch without greater shame or griefe 14. Flattery lying and dissimulation of which hypocrisie is but the brood in the phrase of Gods spirit which searcheth the reines is not to professe one thing with the tongue and purpose another in the heart but rather to protest what for the time present we truly thinke without due examination of the soule or inward parts or resolution to renounce all contrary desires or really to disclaime all interest any creature hath in our minds or affections to the preiudice of the Creator as the Psalmist excellently expresseth this point The wrath of God came vpon them and slew the fattest of them and smote downe the chosen men of Israell For all this they sinned still and belieued not his wondrous workes Therefore their daies did he consume in vanity and their yeeres in trouble When he slew them then they sought him and they returned and enquired early after God And they remembred that God was their Rocke and the high God their Redeemer This conversion questionlesse was not in â—est or pretended only for the present but in their apprehension that made it sincere yet in his iudgement that was greater then their hearts or consciences false and deceitfull because imperfect and irresolute as the Psalmist in the next words instructs vs. Neuerthelesse they did but flatter him with their mouth and they lied vnto him with their tongues The height of their dissimulation as followeth was that their heart was not right with him neither were they stedfast beleeuing or faithfull in his couenant but as their Fathers had beene â— reflectary and rebellious generation a generation that prepared not their hearts and whose spirit was not faithfull with God Nor did this want of preparation or their vnfaithfulnesse proceed from want of purpose to doe God seruice whiles tentations did not assault them but herein rather that like the children of Ephraim being armed and bearing bowes they turned backe in the day of battaile that they kept not the couenant of God and refused to walke in his lawe when the lawe of the flesh did oppose it they for gate i. they did not esteeme his workes and his wonders that hee had shewed them These diuine characters of hypocrisie or dissimulation approues his opinion as well befitting the author that said it was impossible for a Coward to be either an honest man or a true friend For seeing honesty is but a stemme of truth or fidelity his obseruation differs onely in the subiect from that of the wise sonne of Sirach Woe bee to fearefull hearts and faint hands and the sinner that goeth two wayes woe vnto him that is faint hearted for he belieueth not therefore shall he not be defended woe be vnto you that haue lost patience and what will ye doe when the Lord shall visite you More exactly paralelled as well to the occasion and grounds of our Apostles discourse in Hebrewes chap. 10. 11. are these diuine sentences of the same Authour immediatly following They that feare the Lord will not disobey his word and they that loue him will keep his lawes They that feare the Lord will seeke that which is well pleasing vnto him and they that loue him shall be filled with the lawe They that feare the Lord will prepare their hearts and humble their soules in his sight saying we will fall into the hands of the Lord and not into the hands of men for as his Maiesly is sors his mercy From our last resolutions in the former Chapter the Reader will easily conceiue the reason why the same acts operations or practices are sometimes ascribed vnto faith as the chiefe steward or dispenser of spirituall grace sometimes vnto the affection or disposition which it moderates For as faint-heartednesse argues want of faith so patience in aduersity feare of God and constant relying vpon his mercies though springing immediatly from their proper or peculiar habits or affections are enspired and strengthened by faith as blood in the veines is by the blood arteriall 15. If we compare the seuerall growth of sted fast faith and hypocrisie they much resemble the order of composition and resolution
the dead from whence also he receiued him in a figure And as hee staggered not at the first promise concerning his birth through vnbeliefe so neither did he now dispute with God about the lawfulnesse of his act nor reason how he should be raised againe Iustified he was at both instants by his beliefe not as terminated to his worke or to the possibilitie of Isaacks birth and resurrection but as through them it found accesse to his birth death and resurrection whom Isaac prefigured Hauing performed Gods will in obeying his Commaund to sacrifice his onely sonne hee patiently expected the promise concer-cerning his Redeemer whose incarnation whose sufferings and exaltation are obiects of Faith not of works effected by God and not by man although to the like application of their benefits the right works as were in Abraham be most necessary seeing true beliefe of this promise as in the first section was declared virtually includes the same minde in vs that was in CHRIST a readinesse to doe workes of euery kinde which notwithstanding are no associates of Faith in the businesse of iustifycation Not to bee weake in faith not to doubt of the promise through vnbeliefe to be strengthened in faith to be fully perswaded that bee which had promised was able also to performe were pure acts of faith though virtually including works as proper thereto as forcibly excluding all other vertues from sharing with it in this businesse as can possibly bee conceiued yet sayth the Apostle euen for these acts late mentioned it was imputed to him for righteousnesse How preposterous then and basely shuffling are the glosses put by Bellarmine vpon the Apostle in this place as if his purpose had been to shew that the impious and vniust could not be iustifyed by workes onely because Abraham though iust before was not made more iust by meere workes without faith when as he leuels his whole discourse to the cleane contrarie point maintained by vs That seeing righteousnesse was imputed to Abraham by faith and not through works none after him should in this life at any time whether before or after the infusion of grace or inherent righteousnesse presume to seeke or hope for like approbation from God otherwise then onely by faith Thus much the Apostle hath as fully and plainly expressed as any ingenuous Reader can desire Now it was not written for his sake alone that it to wit the strength and full assurance of his faith was imputed to him sorrighteousnesse but also for vs to whom it the like faith shall be imputed for righteousnesse if wee belieue in him that raised vp IESVS our Lord from the dead The ground of the Apostles reason or similitude here mentioned wherein the force and strength of our argument is included supposeth all our righteousnesse whether actuall or habituall should bee as vnapt to attaine euerlasting life or saluation which is the end of all graces bestowed vpon vs as Abrahams decrepit body was to produce so many nations yet as he onely by belieuing God who was able to effect thus much and more obtained the promise and was blessed with more children from Sarahs dead wombe then the most fruitfull Parents that liued before or should come after them so wee onely by like firme beliefe in the same God which raised vp our Lord IESVS CHRIST from the dead shall bee partakers of the promise made in him heires of eternall life whereto seeing our inherent rightcousnesse hath no proportion it must for this reason still be sued for as a meere gift of God farther exceeding all desert of any supernaturall grace in vs then the mighty increase of Abrahams seed did the strength of his decaied nature 6. The first spring of all Romish errors in this argument issues out of their generall ignorance of Saint Pauls phrase amongst many of whose sayings seeming hard and incompatible with their schoole conceits that Rom. 4. of Gods iustifying the impious and vngodly ministers greatest offence and causeth them to inuert the course of their diuinitie quite contrary â—o the Apostles methodâ— To pronounce him iust that is internally impious and vniust cannot in their schoole learning stand with Gods truth but to make him which ere while was by nature vniust and impious inherently and perfectly iust by plentifull infusion of grace is an argument as they deeme of his goodnesse no disparagement to his iustice as perchance it were not might wee iudge of his purpose to saue sinners by the rules of humane reason neuer consulting the Canons of life But if wee conceiue of Gods grace by his comments in whom it dwelt in great abundance this verie conceipt of being iustified by its inherence includes extreame antipathy to the nature and vtterly peruerts the right vse of it as to restraine thâ—â— same Apostles speeches to the first iustification or prime infusion of inherent righteousnesse which is the necessarie consequent of the former error is coÌ„tradictiously to contest with the spirit by which he vttered these diuine Oracles For if belieuing him which iustifies the impious were imputed for righteousnesse vnto Abraham after he had been for a long time more righteous then the ordinarie sort of Gods Saints or Elect Abraham all this while vnfaignedly belieued himselfe to be a sinner no way iustified in himselfe but seeking to be iustified by him who if he shew not mercie vnto sinners whiles they are sinners all mankind should vtterly perish Against this poisonous leauen wherewith the Pharisee first and the Romanist his successor since hath infected the bread of life and tainted the first fruites of Gods spirit S. Paul prescribes that Catholick antidote There is no difference all haue sinned and are depriued of the glory of God and are iustified freely by his grace through the redemption which is in CHRIST IESVS Abraham was all his life time comprehended in this catalogue and is made by the Apostle as a perpetuall so a principall instance of that finall resolution Therefore we conclude that a man is iustified by faith without the workes of the Lawe Was hee then in no sort iustified by workes Yes hee might boldly contest as Iob did and euery godly man yet safely may with others for integrity of life and plenty of workes in which hee might iustly reioice or glorie yet with men not with God In this sense their resolution which say we are iustified by workes before men not before God is most true and warranted by that place of Saint Paul let them nothence deny or occasion others to forget that such integritie or comparatiue rightcousnesse to inherent is necessarily presupposed to iustification in the sight of God and doth not only declare our faith or iustification to men seeing it implies a contradiction in the vnanimous tenent of all reformed Churches to admit faith precedent and workes onely subsequent to the iustification whereof Paul here speakes His drift and scope in that third and fowrth to the Romans
book here we suppose what there shall be prooued that while we are in the flesh wee haue sin in vs more or lesse but depriued of rule or soueraignety where faith or grace hath gotten possession in the heart 2. Man as he is rightly called a little world so hath he a true regiment in himselfe His forme of gouernment in the state of integrity may be parralelled by the imaginary model of Platoes weale publique or the vtopia his disordered state of nature before grace infused by an Anarchy or some outcountry infested by outlawes wherein the best are most exposed to spoile his state of grace by a ciuill or well gouerned kingdome or Aristocracie The best and worst Bodies politique anarchies right ordered states do not differ in that the one hath theeues malefactors and the other none but rather as some dialects in this land distinguish in that the one hath reâ—uers the other onely plaine thieues or briefly in that malefactors cannot so beare themselues out in mischiefe ouersway the Lawes or ouerrunne honest men in the one as in the other they may The times haue bin not long since wherein if any poore man in some quarters of this land should haue followed such rauinous creatures as liued by night spoiles to their dens he should haue had more to take part against him then ioine with him others knowing where there goods were who stole them durst not own them least they should seeme to challenge the felon of theft which would sooner haue endangered their liues then his or procured the burning of their houses ouer their heads or some like mischiefe The honester man more obseruant of his Princes lawes the harder in those daies was his case the ordinary course which the more crafty or politicke could take for their safety was when they saw a thiefe to consent vnto him either outputting their neighbors goods for him to driue or harbouring such as they could not but know to be bootehailers But these misorders God bee praised are much amended their memory though yet fresh fitly serues to set forth the state of the vnregerate or meere naturall man in whom sin is alwaies insolent and audacious euen openly to wound the soule and waste the conscience and persecuted by the Law of God or nature rageth the more and raiseth rebellion in the affections seeking as it were to set all the faculties of the sonie in combustion rather then it should be restrained of it wonted course The onely peace and security the carnally minded thus assaulted finds is to suffer his conscience to sleepe and the eie of reason which I may tearme faith naturall to winke at these disorders of inferiour faculties or tacitely coÌ„sent vnto them But so it is not in the state of grace which not withstanding neuer wants sinfull adherents not only in habite or affection but oftimes bursting out into action to hurt both soule and conscience as there alwaies haue been and euer will be thefts and robberies with other outrages coÌ„mitted euen in the most ciuill best gouerned parts in the land But as in them the meanâ—st subiect that can make proof of his wrongs or who did them may haue enough to take his part for prosecuting or attaching and safely vse the benefit of knowne lawes for repressing or cutting of the stoutest or proudest malefactors so the faithfull heart and conscience is alwaies resolute bold to challenge his dearest affections of euery least transgression to represse arraigne and condeâ—n them And as Carthages often prouocation of Rome cost it dearer in the setting on then other Cittie 's vanquished by the Romanes so such delights or pleasures as haue most wronged our soules or done greatest despight vnto the spirit of grace are kept vnder with greatest care and in the end throughliest moâ—tified by the law of faith Euen in the regiment of this little world that axiome hath it due force Ex malis moribus bonae leges nascuÌ„tur Euery man inuents peculiar lawes secret vowes or the like against such practises or affectioÌ„s as haue most seduced him to transgresse the lawes of his God 3. Now as the state or publike gouernment is not to be scandalized with the infamy of thieues and robbers which harbour in it so long as the magistracie is vigilant to enact and execute seuere lawes for their repression so neither are we accounted by our gratious God amongst the vniust for these sinnes which often make head against vs so long as faith thus fights against them keeps them vnderable to holde such a hand ouer them manifested known as gouernors in a wel ordered body politicke do ouer notorious open malefactors Not that such sins are not in their nature meritorious of eternal death or not sufficient if God shold deale in iustice to condemne vs but that in mercy he doth not impute them whiles thus qualified in the habite we sue for pardon in the name mediation of our Sauior Thus I dare boldly say that not the least sin against the Law of God committed after regeneration but were it possible for the regenerate to giue indulgence to it would at the least exclude them from life eternall Nor doth this argue as some captious reader will perhaps imagine that a man may fall either finally or totally from the state of grace but rather that all impossibility he hath of not so falling essentially depends vpon a like impossibility of not continuing his indulgence to knowne offences or negligence in repeating or bewailing his secret sins Euen after the infusion of faith most perfect faithfull repentance for sins committed is as absolutely necessarie to saluation as the first iususion was Nor is this heauenly pledge while dormant though truely dwelling in our soules immediately apt to iustifie their conceite of these great mysteries is to ieiune triuiall which make iustification but one indiuisible transitory act or mutatum esse from the state of nature to the state of grace In St. Pauls diuinity sure I am â—â— hath a permanent duration it is but the next step vnto hypocrisie a meere peruerting of the vse of grace thus to inferre I haue true faith therfore I shall alwayes vse it aright A wise man would rather argue thus I haue the right vse and exercise of grace therefore my faith is true and such as vvill iustifie As the first infusion of it fully remits our sinnes past and is to vs a sure pledge of GODs perpetuall fauour so in no case may wee take it as an absolute antedated pardon for sinnes to come as if they were forgiuen of God before committed by vs for they are forgiuen by the right vse or exercise not by the bare habit or inhabitation of faith in our soules Into the contrary errors men are often led by a ielousie of comming to neere the Papists if they should admit of more iustifications then one And it is true that iustification in some sence excludes plurality or
same faith though not hypostatically yet truely vnited by such a mysticall but reall vnion as may without solecisme ground as well this denomination as our title or interest in Gods fauour More consequently by much to his owne positions might Bellarmine likewise haue granted that as we are truly the sonnes of wrath by nature albeit euery lineament of Gods image in vs be not quite razed but rather all or most much defared by Adams sinne made ours partly by reall propagation but more principally in his doctrine by imputation so we become the sonnes of God by the spirit of adoption though not so powerfull in vs as vtterly to extirpate all relickes of sin yet able so to dead the force or operation of it as it did the remainder of Gods image in vs before we were renewed by Christ Thus walking not after the flesh though in the flesh nor working sin though sin worke in vs we may through grace or this earnest of the spirit but onely for the righteousnesse of Christ whereto wee are by it vnited haue a more reall title to be enstiled his brethren sons of our heauenly father then Hee can haue as Bellarmine obiects by our doctrine he hath to be called the son of him that is the father of lies and Iesuiticall equiuocation Albeit there was no guile in him yet hee bare the punishment due to our rebellions and was not this commutation of punishment â—herby the seruants of sin are acquitted and the Lord of righteousnesse condemned sufficient to make such as are in part willing to doe for others as hee hath done for them immediately capable of absolution by his innocency of reward by his righteousnesse The a Apostle doubtlesse meant no lesse when hee saide He hath made him to be sin for vs which knew no sin that we should be made the righteousnesse of God in Him 7. The second point against which our aduersaries dash doth so euidently bewray their greatest pilots vnskilfulnesse in this hauen of saluation as euery childe that can repeate his Pater noster may easily perceiue the Trent Fathers themselues did not vnderstand it Nor can the subscribers to this decree vse that celestial prayer without plain mocking of God and Christ This imputation needs no other proofe then the cleare proposall of such positions as they now all holde de fide Take wee then one of their Catechumenies whether destitute of faith or no it skils not that hath not as yet attayned to the first iustification as they distinguish that is one destitute of habituall grace or inherent righteousnesse such a man by their Churches discipline is â—â—â—mitted or rather commanded to vse this petition amongst the rest forgiue vs our trespasses as wee forgiue them that trespasse against vs. What sinnes or trespasses doth hee request should be forgiuen him Mortall especially for their remission onely is necessary to the first iustification But how must God remit them Immediately by pardoning or forgiuing them No they are immediately remitted by actuall introduction of the contrary former grace inherent which formally expels them out of the soule as light to vse Bellarmines owne illustration of their positions in this point doth darknesse out of the aire Nor is there any possibility of remitting sinnes by other meanes left to omnipotence it selfe since the publication of Iesuiticall Comments vpon the Trent Councells decree What then is the full meaning or finall resolution of this petition whilest vttered by men as yet not iustified Lord forgiue vs our trespasses or mortall sinnes This verily and no other Lord by infusion of thy grace make vs such as shall not need of thy pardon or forgiuenesse For to holde that ouer and aboue the infusion of that grace by which the staine of sinne being clearely wiped out we are made iust Gods fauour or condonation to vse their Latine word with addition of one English letter is any way requisite for our acceptance or approbation with him is in formall tearmes the very opinion which Vasquez so peremptorily condemnes in Canus Nedina Victoria Gabriel Richardus Ariminensis Scotus and others as contradictorie to the Trent Councells oft mentioned decree and so indeede it is for by that decree being made formally iust by grace alone we become the immediate or formall obiects of Gods iustice or fidelity now strictly bound to render vs quid pro quo eternall life for grace inherent vtterly exempted from all dependance on his mercy and fauour And whereas some of their late Writers desirous to giue the Church all possible satisfaction yet partly fearing openly to wrong God or flatly to contradict his word had granted that grace infused did quite extirpate all sinne and make vs absolutely iust in our selues but yet could not by it nature or sole entitie obliterate all relation of trespasse or offence commited against God before wee had it as being vnable to make full recompence or satisfaction for them euen this opinion is now reiected as hereticall and contrary to the Councells meaning It remaines therefore that the true and full meaning of that petition in the Lords prayer forgiue vs our trespasses according to our aduersaries construction is Lord grant that we stand not in neede of thy forgiuenesse if wee suppose this petition to be conceiued either by men destitute of perfect inherent righteousnesse or such as distrust or doubt whether they haue it or no. But imagine a man could be as I thinke few Papists are more then morally certaine hee were in the state of perfect grace his vse of the same request would bee superfluous or requisite onely in respect of veniall sinnes albeit euen these if they imprint any vncomely marke or aspersion neuer so light on their soules must be taken away by introduction of the contrary forme as by acts of penitency or the like whereunto Gods concourse or aide of grace is necessarie so that his desiring God to forgiue him them is but to request his help that he may not need his fauour And though in their esteeme but a light one yet a prety mockery of God it is that after infusion of grace they should not stand in neede of his mercy or imputation of their Redeemers righteousnesse either for remitting or taking away of the staine of mortall sinnes or the punishment due vnto them and yet after God hath done all and Christs mediation as farre as concernes them fully accomplished most of them must be highly beholden to the Pope not onely in this life but after death for releasing the punishment due to veniall and petty sinnes 8 Some part of the first difficultie Bellarmine from what place of Caluin Melancthon and Chemnitius I remember not he expresseth not hath thus proposed CHRIST is our mediatour not onely in our first reconciliation but during the whole time of our life in which regard we alwayes stand in neede of his intercession and consequently alwayes sinne and transgresse the Law otherwise CHRIST after our first reconciliation