Selected quad for the lemma: law_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
law_n apostle_n covenant_n faith_n 4,318 5 5.7426 4 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A85302 Animadversions upon Sir Henry Vanes book, entituled The retired mans meditations. Examining his doctrine concerning Adam's fall, Christs person, and sufferings, justification, common and special grace; and many other things in his book. / By Martin Finch, preacher of the Gospel. Finch, Martin, 1628?-1698. 1656 (1656) Wing F941; Thomason E1670_2; ESTC R208407 75,370 163

There are 7 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

into their hearts to be their Lord and Christ for then it would have been well with them for ever though this Author makes such a state but the first image and most unwarrantably calls such the devils subjects page 361. Page 151. He saith Those that come into this first image who yet he saith are not in a saving state have by Christ renewed in them the same pure nature for kind wherein man was at first created and in that state are fed and nourished up at Christs own Table eating his flesh and drinking his blood to the growing up into one living body with him Whatsoever this Author saith of the natural mans having the same pure nature for kind that was in Adam at first if we will believe the Scriptures they will tell us the contrary as Gen. 6.5 And God saw that the wickednesse of man was great in the earth and that every imagination of his heart was onely evil continually where then was the pure nature for kinde that man was at first created in and in the Psalms its said that God looked down from heaven and behold there was none righteous no not one and Jer. 17.9 The heart is deceitful above all things yea desperately wicked who can know it and Jer. 4.14 Wash thine heart from wickednesse that thou mayest be saved which plainly imports thus much that though there may be a great deal of outward reformation in the natural man yet the hearts of none are truly washed from wickednesse and purified but they shall be saved and 2 Pet. 2.14 the Apostle saith of the false teachers who yet no question made a fair shew that they had eyes full of adultery or of the Whore and could not cease to sin where was the same pure nature in kinde that was in Adam when they could not cease to sin but the Author saith further that these men are nourished up at Christs own Table eating his flesh and drinking his blood but he is sufficiently mistaken for what is it to be nourished up at Christs Table but to be nourished up in faith love holinesse and is the natural man thus nourished up what is this but to be nourished up to eternallife and whereas he saith they eat his flesh and drink his blood I answer then they must needes be saved if we will beleive Christs owne expresse words John 6.54 who so eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath eternall life for though this Author maketh nothing of eating Christs flesh and drinking his blood and maketh it but his first Image in which there is no salvation yet saith Christ in the 55. verse of that chap My flesh is meate indeed and my blood is drink indeed He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood dwelleth in me and I in him and least we should beleive such doctrine as this Author bringeth that this is but the first Image or Covenant of works and falleth short of salvation to eate Christs flesh and drink his blood the Lord Jesus maketh a solemne asseveration to evince it he saith in 57. verse As the living Father hath sent me and I live by the Father so he that eateth me shall live by me Thus notably hath Christ confuted this Authors doctrine and left it upon record for a witness against him he saith further that by thus eating of Christs flesh and drinking his blood they grew up into one living body with him and yet by his doctrine in no saving state for all this so that men may be living members of Christ and yet never be saved strange doctrine indeed shall any that are one living body with Christ be damned the Apostle saith Ephe. 5.23 that Christ is the Saviour of the body and I think wee may believe him but he quoteth Luk. 13.25.26 How men shall plead they have eaten and drunk in Christs presence and he hath taught in their streetes but what is this to the purpose did all that sat at table with Christ in the daies of his flesh and eat and drink with him eat his flesh and drink his blood and were all those that heard him teach in their streets made one liveing body with him this would be as strange an inference from this place as those that conclude 7. Sacraments from the five loaves and 2. fishes and alas these were so far from being one living body with Christ that the next verse telleth us that Christ shall say to them I know not where you are and so far from having pure nature of the same kind with Adam that Christ shall say to them Depart from me all ye workers of iniquity What a slurre he casts upon the Godly and Churches of Christ Page 153. calling them the worldly church the incorporated body of visible Saints called out and separated from the world a very cleaver contradicition for if they be called out and separated from the world how are they a worldly church yea and he after confesses they have a manifest selfe-distinguishing proression not onely from all heathenish worship but from corrupt Christian professions and practises but then will I aske this Author how then are they a worldly Church Page 154. He saith that these are a true Church and as Revel 12.1 are cloathed with the Sun yea are the Nursery or womb of all the true Spirituall seede But if they be the true Church of Christ then they are in a saving state and then they are subject to Christ Eph. 5.24 Christ loveth them and hath given himselfe for them v. 25. and presents them to himselfe a glorious Church without spot or wrinkle or any such thing holy and without blemish sanctifies and cleanses them by the washing of the water through the word v. 25.29 and surely all this amounts to eternall salvation and to be cloathed with Christ the Son of righteousness Revel 12.1 wrapt up in these beames of light and life holdeth forth salvation fully and I pray how can these be the nursery and wombe of all the spirituall seede and yet not be the spirituall seede themselves he maketh these but flesh in their highest attainements and John 3.6 that which is born of the flesh is flesh and no better he maketh them but the Law and the Covenant of workes and doth he think the Law and its righteousness is the nursery and wombe of all the spirituall seed the Apostle will teach us another lesson Gal. 3.2 where he asketh the Galatians such a question received ye the spirit by the hearing of the Law or by the preaching faith was the Law or first Covenant the nursery or wombe which brought forth the Spirit in you surely no but the hearing of faith and so Gala. 4.23 he who was of the bond-woman was after the flesh but he that was of the freewas by promise the bondwoman and all that are her children are in bondage Now this Author counts this Church and this state that we are treating on to be but the bondwoman the Law and yet
woman made under the Law he was sent to seeke and to save that which was loft he came to call sinners to repentance he was set forth to be a propitiation for our sins thorough faith in his blood with innumerable places of Scripture to that purpose And we may very well in answer to this Author affirm that God if it had seemed good in his sight could have given eternal life to Adam and preserved him to the Heavenly kingdome in the state wherein he created him but he saith Jesus Christ from the beginning was the right object of faith to Angells and men but I answer that the Lord Jesus could not be so the object of faith to them as he is to us since the fall for before that they were whole and needed not the Physitian could not come to Christ the brazen serpent for healing as those that were stung with the fiery serpents they could not come as lost creatures and weltring in their blood to Christ that they might have life could not apply his blood to cleanse them from sin when as yet they had not sinned nor any guile found in their mouthes but if men instead of admiring the rich and great salvation brought to light through the glorious gospel will curiously pry into the state of the Angells and things which they have not seene vainely puft up with a fleshly minde under the notion of a spiritual mind will be contentious about these things we have noe such custome nor the Churches of God but leave them to flatter themselves in their owne speculations desiring our selves to he found thankfull to God and admirers of his love who when we were Enemies reconciled us unto himself by the blood of his son and desirous to give all diligence to make sure our union and communion with him the Lord our righteousness who when we were lost came to seek us and to save us Page 94. He saith that Jesus Christ was the surety and Mediator of both Testaments 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sponsor is one that undertakes to pay anothers debt that Jesus Christ is said to be the surety of the better Testament Hebr. 7.22 which better Testament is the covenat of grace not the covenant of workes and he is surety of no other Testament but that and according to the tenour of that covenant he the surety payes our debts to God the creditor payes that which he never took suffereth for our sins the just for the unjust to bring us to God and so doth the holy Ghost distinguish betweene Moses and Christ John 1.1.7 Telling us the Law was given by Moses but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ and Hebr. 8.6 Christ hath obtained a more excellent ministry by how much also he is the Mediator of a better covenant not of the old which is established upon better promises then Do this and live and soe likewise Hebr. 9.15 And for this cause he is the Mediator of the new Testament that by meanes of death for the redemption of transgressions under the first testament they which were called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance so the believers under the old testament by this Jesus the Mediator of the new testament being called were justified received the promise possession of the eternal inheritance as well as we to name no more Scriptures where I might abound see Heb. 12.24 And to Jesus the Mediator of the new covenant and to the blood of sprinkling making it a great part of the glory and excellency of the Gospel dispensation above that of the Law that Jesus is the Mediator of this covenant which if they had been of the Authors mind they might have slighted saying that so he was of the other but enough to shew the Authors mistake in this particular Page 69. He saith that Christ had an exercise of a new life set up in him in a way of faith by which he did not onely perform the righteousness and obedience required of man by the Law or first covenant but that also which is required of him by the new and second Covenant Concerning the new life faith as the author calleth it that was set up in Christ the author will give us accasion to speak afterwards for he thinketh Christ had a new birth and regeneration as well as we In the mean while this is not very clear that Christ did performe that righteousness obedience which is required of man by the new second Covenant the gospel or new Covenant calls for Faith in Christ repentance thankfulness mourning for sin I wis the Gospel calls for these things and if the author had said Christ purchased these things for us and all things the gospel or new Covenant calls for so that those for whom he Purchased them shall have them in the appointed time bestowed upon them if he had said thus we should have agreed with him but to say that Christ by a new life and way of faith performed all that the new Covenant or gospells requires will hardly goe downe with us did Christ believe repent mourne for sin and we must note all this while that the author doth not speake this of Christs passive obedience whereby he performed the Fathers will in b●aring our sins in his owne body upon the tree but he speakes of it as a part of his active obedience neither doth the dispute come in here whether we are justified by both Christs active and passive obedience but the question here is only of the nature of Christs active obedience whether therein he performed the obedience that the Gospel or new Covenant requires that is did believe in a Saviour repent and mourn for sin I wis Christ was no sinnes that he needed to believe in a Saviour he was no sinner that he needed to mourn for his sins these are things no way suitable to the person of Christ to do but suitable to us who are to believe in him that justifies the ungodly and to loath our selves for our iniquities and abominations but we shall see by and by how he levels the Lord Jesus debases him whom God hath so highly exalted and given him a name above every name and so he saith Page 97. That Christ by bringing his fleshly principles into the cossation and rest required by the law of the new Covenant he attaines the end for which they were at first given him arriving at that most neere and intimate communion with God which onely by faith or the exercise of a newness of life and operation can be attained Now I would faine know what fleshly principles there were in Christ that the law of the new Covenant required to be laid downe and brought into cessation are these words of truth and soberness concerning our blessed redeemer God blessed for ever that he had such fleshly principles in him as the law of the new covenant required should be brought into cessation truely we have other manner of thoughts of
Christ the Lord our righteousness and so the author tells us that ceasing from his fleshly principles he gets to neere and intimate communion with the Father so then it seemeth he had not such neere and intimate communion with the Father before but we do believe that the very human nature of Christ had of Christ had alwaies very neer intimate communion with the Father excepting the time when it pleased the Father to bruise him and put him to grief when he made his soule an offering for our sins then God hid his face from him that made him cry out My God my God why hast thou forsaken me Page 97. He makes Abrahams offering up Isaac spoken of James 2. To hold forth his offering up the first image I need not say much to throw downe his exposition of that place but I shall onely say this that if that act of his were the throwing up of the first image then it should seeme Abraham had not offered it up before and so according to the authors way was not in a saving state which if it were needfull might abundantly be confuted out of Genesis But Page 98. He saith Abraham herein was but the type or figure of Christ who performed this in himself and this act of obedience being imputed to us presents us righteous and without ●lame before the Throne of God But surely if we will put an allegoricall sense upon this passage of Abrahams offering up his son Isaac they do better that make Abraham to represent God the Father herein that offered his Isaac gave his Isaac for a sacrifice for our sins the beloved son in whom he was so well pleased but this author makes Christ both Abraham and Isaac he makes Isaac his fleshly part but I wold have the author follow his allegories a little better and wiselier not to plainly contradict the holy Ghost in his allegories for Gal 4. The holy ghost maketh Ishmael to signifie the covenant of workes and Isaac the covenant of grace and verse 28. So we as Isaac was are the Children of the promise so that when the holy ghost makes Isaac to signifie the new covenant the author is too bold to make him signifie the law and the offering of him to signifie the offering up of a legall state And so this author saith more plainly Page 99. That Christ actually sacrificed the true Isaac crucifiing in himselfe the life of his fleshly seed and legall principles Thus we see how he thwarts the holy ghost who will have Isaac to hold forth the new covenant the free woman the Ierusalem that is above and to hold forth those that are borne after the spirit in that 4. Galath But this author will needs have Isaac to signifie the fleshly seed and legall principles Page 99. He saith that Christ and his whole seed enter into rest by Faith But the author must have a care how he rank Christ and the Saints together and liken them in believing we come to him that is beleive in him and so our troubled weary heavy laden souls enter into rest Matt. 11.28 And there is no such way in the world to get rest for a weary soule but by faith in Christ applying his blood which speaketh better things then the blood of Abel but how Christ needes to enter into rest by faith as we sinfull creatures do is a paradox but as I said before he levels the Lord Jesus and mightily debases him Page 103. He saith that which in the first sense Christs naturall man was a sufferer in consisted in the weakness and disabilitie which was brought upon his fleshly mind to resist the powerfull workings of his faith or spirituall minde A strange passage that Christ had a fleshly carnall minde in him as well as a spirituall minde but we believe there was no fleshly mind in our Redeemer and wonder that this author is so bold as to affirme it and he maketh it the worke of his death and cross to subdue his fleshly minde and if there were such a fleshly mind in Christ Jesus it was no suffering and affliction to have that taken away but rather a great mercy but far be it from us to have such low and mean and base thoughts of our deare Saviour But in the same 103. Page He saith that Christ was thus brought into such a frame of spirit that he was disabled from doing any thing against the truth and thereby qualified to do all for the truth As if there was a time when Christ had such a frame of spirit that he might have acted against the truth and will of God but by taking up the higher image was disinabled from doing so and before that time was not qualified to do all things for the truth and he adds in the same place that this profitable weakness and disability namely not to do any thing against the truth came not all at once upon Christs naturall man but gradually then this author would make him for a time to be in great danger of sinning but that by degrees he grew disinabled from sinning And Page 104. He saith thus in this first part of Christs passive obedience he through the law becomes dead to the law through the law of the spirit of life in the second Adam becomes dead to the law and life of the first fulfilling the whole law of righteousness by being rendred utterly unable to perform one tittle of it in mans first activity and sufficiency or as left alone to the grace strength received by his first covenant principles Let us examine how Christ by the law became dead to the law Paul indeed saith thus of himselfe Gal 2.19 I through the law am dead to the law that is seeing the law spirituality and my owne weakness to keep it that if I be under the law I must needs be under the curse I am dead to the law that is will not put my selfe under it as a covenant of workes to doe it and live but I seeke to have my life hid with Christ in God and to have him to be the end of the law for righteousness to me but Christ could not be dead to the law in this respect for he was able to performe every tittle of it which Paul and we were not able to doe but I say Christ needed not as we to fly from the law as that which is weake and unable through the flesh and inability in us to keep it to bring us unto life and so to goe unto another for righteousness and life and he goes on to make Christ one while keeping the law out of strength that he received by first Covernant principles but afterwards he faith he could not performe one tittle of it as left to those principles thus doth he represent Christ one while obeying upon the principles of the Covenant of works another while he could not obey at upon these principles running into these notions about Christ by slighting the
him that was both God and man and therefore his blood is called Acts 20. the blood of God not that the divine nature could die but because he that shed his blood upon the Crosse was both God and man Again secondly the righteousnesse of Christ is called the righteousnesse of God because it is the righteousness God accepts for justification and hath appointed for the salvation and justification of his people and the onely righteousness that he imputeth to us when he justifieth us and thus it is said Rom. 10.3 that they being ignorant of Gods righteousnesse and going about to establish their owne righteousnesse have not submitted themselves to the righteousnesse of God that is to say they not knowing that Christs righteousness was the only righteousness that God would accept for the justification of a sinner they went about to establish their owne righteousnesse they thought their own obedience and righteousnesse would doe it and so never saw the shortness of their owne obedience to bring them unto life and therefore never submited to the righteousness of God never came to Christ that they might have life Thirdly Christs righteousness may be called Gods righteousness because Christs righteousnesse imputed to us declares Gods righteousnesse in justifying of us that he is just in it Rom. 3.29 Page 188. He saith that the Apostles meaning Rom. 7. when he saith the Law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth is that the Law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth unto Christ as his bridegroom husband under the first covenant are as it were his married wife Isaiah 54.1 bearing Children or becoming fruitfull unto Christ in that state But I wis his meaning is that the law hath dominion over a man that is hath power to curse us and condemn us so long as we live under it as a Covenant of workes for so here the Apostle is shewing the difference betweene a man that is united to Christ and one that is not united to Christ not the difference betweene a man that is united to Christ in the flesh and a man that is united to Christ in the higher image as this Author supposes and how plainly doth this Author contradict himselfe herein for page 118. he telleth us that those that are married to Christ and receive him according to the first covenant that they have the benefit of Christs legall righteousnesse by which he satisfied the Law so that he saith the law hath nothing to say against such but here he saith the Law hath dominion over such that is hath power to curse them and condemne them if the Author doth not plainly contradict himselfe in these two places let the reader judge and he goes on here to tel us that in this state men are married to Christ bear Children or become fruitfull unto him truly then our issue are not bastards when we are married to Christ beare children and are fruitfull to him surely Christ will for ever owne such to be his spouses and their Issue to be his but what Isa 54.1 will prove for him I know not neither is he pleased to tell us how he will argue from it but I am sure it will make against him for those that are there said now to beare and bring forth fruit are said in the 5. verse to have their Maker to be their husband and ver 8. God saith with everlasting kindnesse he will have mercy on them which surely is a saving state Page 189. He saith the fleshly seed of Israel were implanted into Christ so that by his righteousnesse and not by their owne they were made righteous and in him as in the first fruits the whole lumpe was rendred holy The elect among the children of Israel were so but we shall stay long enough before the Author can prove that all the fleshly seed of Israell were implanted into Christ and made righteous by his righteousness if they had they had surely been in a saving state will the Author never leave undervaluing the righteousness of Christ and saying that a man may be made righteous not in his owne righteousness but in the righteousness of Christ and yet not be in a saving state the worst I wish the Author is that he may be righteous in the righteousness of Christ which he hath lifted up his hand so high against in his booke that so he may finde mercy in that day when he must give an account of his booke and of all things he hath done in the body if the righteousness of Christ will not stand us in stead we perish for ever He is mistaken in Rom. 11. for by the first fruits there spoken of is not meant Christ but Abraham with whom God made such a gracious Govenant according to which the Jewes shall at last finde favour in Gods eyes who are beloved for that Fathers sake and therefore the Scripture often tells us that when the Jews provoked God he remembered the Govenant that he made with Abraham and did not forget the Covenant of their Fathers which he sware unto them Page 190. He applies 2 Colos 11. 13. verses to men in his first image that they are made partakers of all that is there spoken But we will try that the eleventh verse it is thus in whom also ye are circumcised with your circumcision made without hands in puting of the body of the sins of the flesh by the circumcision of Christ I do not a little marvell that he should apply this to men in the first image wherein there is no salvation for who doth the Apostle speak these of but of such as in the chapter before he calls Saints faithful verse 2. saith that they had faith in the Lord Jesus and love to all the Saints telleth them there was hope laid up for them in heaven verse 5. and second chap. 10. tells them they were compleat in Christ and were not such as these in a saving state to have true faith in the Lord Jesus and be compleat in him is not this a saving state And now the Apostle goeth on further to shew what these believers had received from Christ how your hearts were circumcised by the circumcision that Christ is the worker of which is no other but the true regeneration of the spirit and verse 13. saith how they were quickned together with Christ and all their trespasses forgiven them if to be thus be not a saving state I know not what is and let this Author have a care of misinterpreting Scripture in this manner wresting the Scriptures to make out his notions of his images and thus calling light darknesse calling true regeneration and the faith of Gods elect but common grace Page 191. He saith those that are in the first image have writ out in the fleshly table of their hearts a conformity to that image of God that shines forth in the flesh of Christ and this is their sanctification and there and page 192. he
this way though he will not have the soul to be in a saving state here yet saith there are three benefits such a soul hath He saith in that 118. page he saith first They that are thus made receivers of Christ are called out of the world to come out of that Heathenish state wherein men live as without Christ and without God in the world Truly this is a great benefit and surely whosoever is truly called out of the world is in a saving state to be called out of the worlds prophaneness hypocrisie will-worship formality called out of the worlds way in going about to establish their own righteousness and living to themselves and their lusts I think a soul that is thus called out of the world is in a happy condition whatsoever this Author saith for being by Christ called out of the world he shall not be condemned with the world and I am sure Christ John 15.19 makes a mans being of the world to be a natural man and his being not of the world to be a state of true Saintship such as the Disciples themselves had and so if we consider what it is to live without Christ to wit to live without the righteousness the spirit the grace the faith of Christ we may well say that a man that Christ hath truly called out of a state of living thus without him is in a saving state for it must needs follow that he being called out of a state of living with Christ he must needs now have Christ his righteousness his spirit his grace But the Author will grant us that a man may have Christ his righteousness and spirit and yet not be in a saving state For in the same 118. page he cometh to shew a second benefit which those receive from Christ that receive him in the first Covenant he saith Christ is made unto such righteousness in a way of justification and they are made the righteousness of God in him and that he affords such the benefit of his legal righteousness so that the Law hath nothing to say against such and page 119. he saith this justification the world hath in common with true Believers I think this opinion may call this Author father for I think he is the first that ever affirmed I mean one that went for a Christian that to be made the righteousness of God in Christ was not a saving state and truly we may say in this case as he said if I am bereaved I am bereaved if to be made the righteousness of God in Christ doth not save us eternally then we are bereaved indeed and are of all men most miserable and the generation of Gods children the most deceived that ever any were in the world but this Author must not think to carry it thus let us search the Scriptures Philip. 3.5.9 Paul counted all things but dross that he might win Christ and be found in him not having on him his own righteousness which is of the Law but that which is through the faith of Christ the righteousness which is of God by faith and doth any man think that this was not a saving state and 2 Cor. 5.21 He hath made him to be sin for us who knew no sin that we might be made the righteousness of God in him And is not this a certain and unfailing way to bring us to eternal life to be made the righteousness of God in him the Lord our righteousness hath God appointed any other way to justifie sinners and bring them to eternal life and glory then by being made the righteousness of God in him when God out of his rich grace maketh a poor sinner accepted in the beloved righteous in the righteousness of Christ what should hinder his salvation for ever who should lay any thing to such a souls charge to condemn him when God justifies him through Christs righteousness and the Author here confesses that the Law hath nothing to say against such when a soul can truly say by faith as Isaiah 45.24 Though I have sinned and come short of the glory of God yet Christ Jesus was made sin for me that I might be made the righteousness of God in him and surely in him have I righteousnesse life and strength that soul is in a saving state and shall never come into condemnation but is passed from death to life let all the devils in hell say what they will to the contrary and though these places that I have already named be sufficient to prove that which I am about yet I shall name another that is as full as we can desire Rom. 5.17 For if by one mans offence death reigned by one much more they that receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reigne in life by one Jesus Christ Let us mind this blessed Scripture so full of marrow and fatness to feed our soules If saith the Apostle by one mans offence death reigned by one that is if by the one man Adams offence or his one offence of eating the forbidden fruit death reigned thereby that is we were all brought to death and condemnation that his disobedience being imputed to us we were brought to such misery and condemnation much more they that receive abundance of grace the grace of God which bringeth salvation and of the gift of righteousness that is Christs righteousness to have that imputed to them they shall reign in life by one Jesus Christ that is as certainly as death and condemnation came upon us by Adams disobedience so certainly shall we have salvation and reign in life and glory for ever receiving the gift of Christs righteousness the second Adam and this is more explained in the 21. verse of that Chapter That as sin hath reigned unto death even so might grace reign thorough righteousness unto eternal life thorough Jesus Christ our Lord which plainly affirms this that as Adams sin brings eternal death and condemnation so the righteousnesse of Christ brings eternal life and salvation Let us see whether he be not as much mistaken in the third benefit by Christ that men may have and yet not be in a saving state Page 119. he saith The third benefit inseparably accompanying this kind of Christs giving himself by the first Covenant is that which we call sanctification 1 Cor. 1.30 consisting in a real and actual change of the heart which lyeth in our conformity to Christs legal righteousness That place 1 Cor. 1.30 saith Christ is made of God unto us sanctification and redemption unto us that is unto us that truly believe in him but he doth not say that he is made so to others what doth he mean by this real and actual change of the heart doth he mean that which is called a new heart and a new spirit Ezek. 36.26 if so he is out for that onely God giveth to those that are eternally saved and truly methinks that men instead of disputing that the natural man may be sanctified so as
saith too that Christ himselfe is made their head and covering as to their justification they are made righteous not in themselves but in another even through the Mediatorship of the man Christ Jesus as their Head in whose natural righteousnesse and perfection they stand blamelesse before God Here is Christs righteousnesse imputed for justification and Christs righteousnesse imparted for our sanctification and yet the Author would make us believe all this is not a saving state but I wis the writing of Gods Laws in our hearts is a peculiar benefit of the new Covenant of grace Jer. 31. but he maketh it to be given as a benefit by the renewal of the old Covenant again by Christ and ô how dishonorable is this to Christ the Lord of life that men may have him for their head and covering for their justification and yet not be in a saving state but what saith the Scripture Rom. 8.30 Those whom the Lord justifieth them he also glorifies then which what can be plainer to prove that such as are justified by Christ are in a saving state for the text tells us such shall be glorified let this Author say what he will to the contrary that this is but the first image and Christ in the flesh the sure word of the Gospel tells us that those whom the Lord justifies shall certainly be glorified brought to heaven inherit eternal life and whereas he saith Christ is made their covering for justification then I say they must needs be in a sure and saving state Psal 32.12 Blessed is the man whose iniquities are pardoned and whose sinnes are covered by the robes of Christs righteousnesse such can never come into condemnation God seeth no iniquity in such with a judicial eye to take vengeance and damn them for it for Christ covereth their sins in that respect that in that sense God seeth no iniquity in Jacob nor no transgression in Israel but only seeth the sins of such with the eye of a Father which is well for them to reclaim them better them and heal their backslidings as Isaiah 57.18 We see the Author makes no bones of counting Christs righteousnesse invalid for justification and yet sufficiently contradicting himself saith that this righteousnesse of Christs makes us to stand blamelesse before God but then are not such in a saving state if we be blamelesse by Christ before God then I may ask this Author as Rom. 8.33.34 who shall lay any thing to their charge who shall condemne them seeing God Justifies them and the Author confesses they stand blamelesse before him Page 193. He saith these are represented in Pauls owne person Rom 7. as having that workmanship set up in their hearts and mindes which stands in an exact conformity to the Law or image of Christs natural righteousness but in the next page he saith they find by experience no good thing dwelling in their flesh that is abiding and of a continual residence with them being in such a wavering condition that whilest with their minde they serve the Law of God they are ready with their flesh to serve the Law of sin and the good they would doe that they doe not and the evill which they would not doe that they doe But stay first the Author is mistaken in this that he thinketh the true saints that shall inherit eternall life are not represented by Pauls own person that which is there said in that 7. of Rom. was true of Paul and then surely as true of other saints and this Author goeth about here to make Paul but in the first image for Paul saith all that of himself and the Author thinketh this was but the first image and calls this a being under the Law alas he that mindes the 9.10.11 verses of that Chap. will see that Paul and the persons represented in him were of from the Law for life for he saith the Law ●●ew him he found that to be but death well but why must this be but a man in the first image and out of a saving state why the Author saith that these have no good thing dwelling in their flesh that is faith he abiding and of a continuall residence with them but hold a little that is not the meaning of it for in us that is in our flesh is nothing spiritually good not only that there is nothing that doth abide and continue but there is nothing at all good in us by nature in me that is in my flesh that is as I am naturall and as considered without the grace and spirit of God so I have no good thing dwelling in me and so it is with every saint of God that they may all say as he said Horreo quicquid de meo est I abhominate what is of my self or with Paul in me that is in my flesh dwells no good thing I have no good in me no good thoughts desires inclinations but as God worketh in me to will and to doe of his owne good pleasure but I pray let the Author shew us any thing to the contrary but that a man in his higher image may not have cause to say and confesse as much that in them that is in their flesh dwells no good thing in a word there doth not onely no good thing abide and continue in our hearts by nature but it was never there to be found but we are transgressors from the wombe Well he saith further as v. 25. that whilest with their minde they serve the law of God they are ready with their flesh to serve the law of sin and I pray who is not so Paul there saith it was so with him and we are content to acknowledge it is so with us though the Author for it say we are but in the first Image we confesse we are fle●h and spirit and the flesh in us rebelleth against the spirit and the spirit against the flesh and while we with our minds and hearts desire to serve the law of God and doe his will the flesh in us draweth another way this enemy in our owne bosomes the flesh and law of our members is often too hard for us and brings us into captivity this is our burthen our gall and wormwood in this world and makes us cry out often with Paul ver 24. O wretched man that we are and with Isaiah we are uncleane we are uncleane and yet for all this we know that the blood of Jesus Christ cleanseth us from all sin and the spirit of Christ will sanctifie us wholly and cast all our sinnes into the depths of the Sea and the time will come when we shall sin no more and all things in us shall be made subject to Christ though we see not yet all things made subject unto Christ yet having faith in Christ the work is doing and we shall be purified one day even as he is pure and our sanctification shall be as compleat and perfect hereafter as our justification is here the remainders of corruption are
God unto salvation 1 Pet. 1.5 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as in a strong guard or garrison that the Devil can never take as he did Adams state by craft when the serpent beguiled Eve yea when Satan desires to have us that he may winnow us as wheat Christ prayes for us that our faith faile not but he that hath begun his good work in us to have our faith and hope in Christ will perform it to the day of Jesus Christ the righteousness of Christ is imputed to no man but by an act of the free grace of the Father and being so freely imputed its continuance is certain and for ever God by his mighty power keeps them from drawing back to perdition keeps them in a way of believing and preserves them to the heavenly Kingdome eternal life is freely given them by Christ and therefore they shall never perish neither shall any man be able to pluck th●● out of his hands John 10.27 28. CHAP. VI. Treats more particularly of the Covenant of Works and the Covenant of Grace and the difference between them THe Author to make his Doctrine more taking up and down his Book would perswade the Reader that those that he saith are called Orthodox doe but seek their life and righteousnesse from the Covenant of Works and that we may be made the righteousnesse of God in Christ and yet be but under the covenant of works This we have touched before and here by the grace of God shall more particularly treat of First then Let us consider what the Law and Covenant of Works is It calls for full and perfect obedience on our part with promise on Gods part to give life thereupon and threatning death and damnation to him that disobeyes that the soule that sinneth it shall dye as Gal. 3.10 As many as are of the works of the Law are under the curse for it is written Cursed is every one that continueth not in every thing that is written in the Book of the Law to doe it which shewes us how the Law curses and condemnes all that are under it upon the least transgression and disobedience and therefore as the Apostle saith here being we have all sinned as many of us as are under the Law and not under grace are under the curse and if under the curse of the law then its false that the Author saith in many places of his Book that a man may have Christ made righteousnesse to him in a way of justification and yet be but under the law and covenant of works for a man cannot at the same time be both justified and be under the curse and we see whoever is under the covenant of works is under the curse and so consequently it is a mistake that the Author holds that such have Christ made righteousnesse to them in a way of justification According to the law and covenant of works the least sin damnes a man one vaine thought one idle word brings the vengeance of eternal fire every disobedience receiveth such a just recompence of reward therefore saith the Scripture Rom. 4.15 The Law worketh wrath for where no Law is there is no transgression no man under the covenant of works can be justified as this Author imagines for the law and covenant of works worketh wrath sets justice against us and makes all the world become guilty before God Rom. 3.19 No man is absolved under the covenant of works and hath remission of sins but all become guilty before God Hence also 2 Cor. 3. 6,9 the covenant of works is said to kill the Gospel only to make alive the covenant of works to be the ministration of condemnation the covenant of grace to be the ministration of righteousnesse and so Rom. 7.8 Without the law sin is dead hath no power to condemn us for the strength of sin is the law and Paul ver 11. saith by it to wit the law sin slew him Adam was the primus faederatus in the covenant of works the Lord Jesus the second Adam in the covenant of grace The first Adam was a common person in that covenant of works and stood in the room of all mankind he Broke the conditions of that covenant and there can be no renewal of that covenant of works no coming to life that way that covenant is broken and so all the world become guilty before God there is no receiving of Christ upon the terms of this covenant of works as this Author saies page 118. and in many other places and in the same page saith that we are made the righteousnesse of God in Christ upon the tenour of that covenant for we have seen that by the covenant of works we stand upon our own obedience not upon Christs we have our life in our own righteousnesse not in Christs it is by the Gospel the covenant of grace that any man comes to have Jesus Christ made of God unto him wisedom righteousness sanctification and redemption which Covenant of grace comes next to be explained This Covenant of grace whereof we now speak was made principally with Christ as the common person representing all the elect as the Covenant of works was made with Adam a common person representing all mankind and Christ Jesus is said Isa 49.8 to be given for a Covenant to the people the father and Christ having struck hands in that Covenant of grace and peace between them both Now this Covenant of grace is a blessed compact and agreement between the father and Christ Jesus that Christs soul should be made an offering for our sins that he should purge away our sins by the sacrifice of himself reconcile us to God by the blood of his Crosse and that God would be our God remember our sins no more accept us in him the beloved justifie us sanctifie us bestow upon us grace and glory and blesse us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly things in him this is that which we count to be the Covenant of grace and let this Author if he can shew that this is but the Covenant of works Our standing in the Covenant of works depended upon Adams obedience while he stood we stood when he fell we fell our standing in the Covenant of grace depends upon Christ that while he is righteous we are righteous that are found in him and so Christ tells us John 14.19 because I live ye shall live also he hath performed that commandement that he received of the father to lay down his life for his sheep and so God is reconciled for ever in the volumn of Gods book it is written of Christ that he should thus do the will of God in bedring the chastisement of our peace in the body prepared for him Heb. 10 Christ according to his agreement and Covenant with the father to purchase eternal life grace and glory for those whom he had given him did bear our sins in his own body upon the tree was delivered for our offences and rose again for our