the obligee to sue the heire Executors or Administrators of the obligor and if the executors have assets in their hands yet the obligee may sue the heire if he will because he hath bound the heire as well as himselfe neither can the heire plead that there is assets in the hands of the executors day of the writ purchased as heretofore in some ancient bookes it hath beene done but he must pleade rien by descent 10. H. 7. f. 8. Ployd f. 440. Davis case For now the law is changed and it is accounted his owne debt and debt will lie against the heire of the heire to many generations as Dier affirmeth f. 868. albeit of this Mr. Ployden maketh a doubt but his plea that he had nothing at the day of the writ purchased nor ever after is good for if he before aliened the assets he is discharged of the debt Popham f. 151. But if the heire doth not confesse the Action and shew the certainty of the assets but pleadeth rien by descent is condemned by default of answer the Plaintiff shall have execution of his other Land or of his goods or of his body by capias ad satisfaciendum as he might have had for the debt of the heire himselfe if he had made the obligation vide 21. E. 3. f. 9. ibidem plura and Coke l. 3. Sir William Herberts case where the case is upon a Scire facias against the heire But otherwise if the executor in debt pleadeth rien entre mains c. and is found against him nothing shall bee put in execution but the goods of the dead because the debt is not the debt of the executor but of the testator and is charged in anothers right and hath the goods in anothers right whereas when the heire denieth assets c. and it is found that he hath assets the debt of his Ancestor is become his debt in respect of the assets which he hath in his owne right and so the property which he hath in his own right of the land maketh the debt his own proper debt and for that reason the writ shall be in the debet and detinet and the Plaintiff may have execution by elegit of the moiety of all his Lands as a fieri facias of his goods Ployd ibidem f. 441. But in Popham f. 151. it is said by Iones and Crew that a generall judgement shall be given against the heire if he doth plead falsly that he hath no assets and not upon a nihil dicit Haeres non tenetur in Anglia ad debita antecessoris reddenda nisi per antecessorem ad hoc fuerit obligatus praeter quam d ebita regis tantum Flet a. l. 2. c 55. An heire is not bound in England to pay the debt of his Ancestor unlesse it be the debts of the King Coke com f. 386. a As if a man bind himselfe by warranty and bindeth not his heire they are not bound for he must say Ego haeâ—edes mei warrantiabimus I and my heires will warrant ibidem Coke com 144 b. If a rent charge be granted to one and his heires he shall not have a writ of Annuity against the heire of the grantor albeit he hath assets unlesse the grant be for him and his heires And the heire by the grant of an Annuity by the Ancestor shall not be bound unlesse hee have assets And it is a Maxime at the common law that the heire shall never be bound to any expresse warranty but where the Ancestor was bound by the same warranty for if the Ancestor be not bound it cannot descend upon the heire as if a man maketh a feoffement in fee and bindeth his heirs to warranty this is a void warranty because the Ancestor himselfe was not bound as also if a man bind his heirs to pay a sum of money this is void Coke com f. 386. a. Exception Customary inheritances shall not be assets to charge the heire in an Action of debt upon an obligation made by his Ancestors although he bind him and his heires And for the same reason issue in taile shall never avoid things done by his Ancestor but such things which are or may be to his disadvantage and not for the benefit of the issue as T 44. E. 5. f. 21. Where tenant in taile was upon a defeasible title and to have a release of right of him that had right he granted to him a Rent-charge of twenty pound and that the charge should be levied upon the issue in taile and because the rent was for the release of right and the issue had benefit by it it was adjudged that the issue shall not avoid the grant and 46. E. 3. f. 4. If Lands be given in taile so as the Donee may alien for the profit of his issue that is a good condition or power limited to him And so if tenant in taile suffer a common recovery in which he is vouched and hath recompence the issue shall be bound and so if he alien with warranty and leaveth assets to his issue the issue shall not avoid the warranty because it is not to his disadvantage Ployd f. 437. b. in Smiths case vide Semper praesumitur pro legitimatione purorum filiatio non potest probari Coke l. 5. f. 98. b. Burys case Legitimation of Children is allwayes presumed and begetting of Children cannot be proved Bury was divorced from his first wife a vinculâ— matrimonâ—j causa frigiditatis and as he lawfully might married a second wife and had issue by her and it was adjudged that the issue of the second wife was legitimate for notwithstanding his naturall imbecility deposed before the divorce it was said that a man might be habilis and inhabilis diversis temporibus and that though the second marriage was yet it remaineth a marriage untill it is dissolved and by consequence the issue which was had during the coverture if no divorce was had in the life of the parties is lawfull for lawfulnesse of Children is allwayes presumed and filiation cannot be proved Ibidem Coke Com. 126. a. A man leaveth his wife enseint with child issue shall not be taken that shee was not enseint by her husband for filiatio non potest probari but the issue must be whether shee were ensciut at the day of her death ibidem f. 244. If the husband be within the foure Seas that is within the jurisdiction of the King of England if the wife hath issue no proofe is admitted to prove the child a bastard for filiatio non potest probari unlesse the husband hath an apparent impossibility of procreation as if the husband be but eight years old or under the age of pro-creation such issue is a bastard albeit he be born within marriage The Law supposeth that to be true which is false because it may be true as a man marrying a woman that was with-child before marriage the Law supposeth the child to be the
est haeres viventis and the remainder is onely good upon this contingent if I. S. dieth during the life of the lessor Coke com f. 378. a. But if lands be given to A. and B. so long as they joyntly together live the remainder to the right heires of him which dieth first and warranteth the land in forma praedicta A. dieth his heire shall have the warranty and yet the remainder vested not during the life of A. for the death of A. must precede the remainder and yet shall the heire of A. have the land by descent vide ibidem 378. b. Justum non est aliquem ante natum mortuum facere Bastardum qui toto tempore suo pro legitimo habebatur Coke l. 8. f. 101. a. b. It is not just to make any one a Bastard borne before marriage being dead who all his life time was accounted legitimate For by the law of England if such a Bastard which the law termeth Bastard eigne doth continue possession in peace that is if the mulier make no entry for the Bastard eigne or continuall claime and so dieth in peace his issue is become right heire and will bar the mulier because he was legitimate by the lawes of the holy Church For though the subsequent marriage doth not make a Bastard legitimate quoad consuetudinem regni as â—ract phraseth it in regard of the custome of the Realme yet quoad sacerdotium in respect of the Canon law it doth and in this case of legitimation which in law is so precious and of so great estimation the law respecteth neither infancy or other defects in the mulier but preferreth legitimation of blood before any benefit of temporall inheritance and therfore the law saith that by the death of Bastard eigne in peace his issue is become right heire and by consequence the mulier is barred and the descent doth not onely take away the entry but the right also and therefore descent in this case shall be a bar to right as descent of services rents reversions expectant upon an estate taile shall bar the right of the mulier 14. E. 2. Bastardy 26. but not the entry or claime of the disseisee But if a Bastard eigne dieth without issue so as the land doth descend the mulier shall have it ibidem and if the Lord by escheat entreth this shall not bar the mulier because no descent Coke com 244. If there be Bastard eigne and mulier puisne and the father maketh lease for life reserving rent and the bastard eigne receiveth the rent and dieth having issue this shall barr the mulier Coke com f. 15. a. If a man hath issue a son being a Bastard eigne and a daughter and the daughter is married the father dieth and the son entreth and dieth seised this shall barre the feme covert and the descent in this case of services rents reversions expectant upon estate or for life whereupon rents are reserved c. shall bind the right of the mulier but the descent of these shall not bind them that right have to an Action Coke com f. 244. a. So if the Bastard dieth seised and his issue endoweth the wife of the Bastard the mulier cannot enter upon tenant in dower for his right was barred by the descent ibidem If the Bastard eigne entreth into land and hath issue and entreth into religion this descent shall bar the right of the mulier ibidem If a man hath issue two daughters the eldest being Bastard eigne and they enter and occupy peaceably as heires the law shall not adjudge the whole possession in the mulier so as if the Bastard had issue and died her issue shall inherit and if they make partition that partition shall binde the issue for ever Coke com 244. a. b. And such a Bastard being impleaded or vouched shall have his age If a man hath issue a Bastard eigne or mulier puisne and the Bastard in the life of the father hath issue and dieth and then the father dieth seised and the son of the Bastard entreth as heire to his Grand-father and dieth seised this descent shall bind the mulier ibidem b. If the Bastard enter and the mulier dyeth his wife being privement with a Son and the Bastard hath issue and dyeth seised the Son is borne his right is bound for ever but if the Bastard dyeth seised his wife enseint with a Son the mulier entreth and the Son is borne the issue of the Bastard is barred ibidem 244. a. If the bastard eigne entreth and the King seiseth the Land for some contempt committed by the Bastard for which the King receiveth the profits of the Land and the Bastard dyeth and his issue upon petition is restored to the possession the mulier barred for ever But when the King seiseth for a contempt of the Father c. if the issue of the Bastard eigne upon petition be restored for that the seisure was without cause the mulier is not barred for the Bastard could never enter but the possession of the King in that case shall be adjudged in the right of the mulier Coke ibidem f. 245. b. Bastardus nullius est filius Littleton Coke com f. 203. a. aut filius populi Coke l. 6. f. 6. A bastard is the Son of none or the Son of the people according to the common report Cui pater est populus pater est fibi nullus omnis Cui pater est populus non habet ille patrem To whom the people Father is to him is Father none and all To whom the people Father is well Fatherlesse we may him call For as the civilians pater est quem nuptiae demonstrant he is a Father whom the espousalls and nuptialls shew so to be And therefore if a wife have a bastard it shall not be a villaine or if a villaine have a bastard by a woman and marrieth her the bastard is no villaine because he is nullius filius though some hold the contrary as Bracton and Britton for in both cases the issue at the common Law is a bastard quasi nullius filius Coke com f. 123. a. And though a bastard be a reputed Son yet is he not such a Son in consideration whereof an use may be raised because in judgement of Law he is nullius filius Dyer 374. And for the same reason where the Statute of 32. H. 8. of wills speaketh of children bastard children are not within that statute and a bastard of a woman is no child within that Statute where the mother conveyeth Lands unto him Dyer 313. Qui ex damnato coitu oriuntur inter filios non computantur Coke com f. 3. b. Who are borne of condemned or unlawfull copulation are not to be reckoned among children as a man maketh a lease to B. for life the remainder to the issue male of B. and the heires males of his body B. hath issue a bastard Son he shall not take the remainder because
remainder is appointed in fee to the right heires of I. S. who dieth having a daughter which entreth after the death of tenant for life there the son after borne shall not recover the lands before vested in the daughter as purchased for thereit is a fee simple to which the son after born hath no right for the lands were in none of his Ancestors before But where the estate is an estate taile the son ought to have it per formam doni As if a feme which suffereth a recovery by covin contrary to the Statute of 11. H. 7. is defeated by entry of the daughter tenant in taile the son borne may enter and oust the daughter for that the title in taile is in him because the statute saith he shall enjoy it according to the title which is in taile and therein the common proverb is verified One shall beat the bush and the other have the bird As if a man hath land by descent of the part of the mother and maketh a feoffment on condition and dieth without issue and the heire of the part of the father entreth the heire of the part of the mother may oust him Ployd 56. b. and 57. a. In Wimbish case quod vide Infinitum injure reprebatur Coke l. 6. f. 45. What is infinite is reproved and rejected in law As if a man have a debt by simple contract and taketh an obligation for the same debt or any part of it the contract is determined 3. H. 4. 17. 11. H. 4. 9. and 9. E. 4. 50. 51. So if a man have a debt upon an obligation and by course of law hath a judgement upon it the contract by specialty is changed into a thing of record for if he that recovereth should have a new Action or a new judgement he may have infinite Actions and infinite judgements to the perpetuall charge and vexation of the defendant and he shall not have a new Action or a new judgement for what is infinite is rejected in law So upon every judgement the defendant shall be amerced and if he bee a Duke Marquess Earle Viscount or Baron he shall be amerced 100 l. and so the defendant should be infinitely amerced upon an obligation which shall be mischievous Ibid. And lib. 7. f. 45. b. It was resolved in the Court of Wards by the greater part that a Bill of reviver upon a bill of reviver shall not be admitted by reason of the infiniteness which is rejected in law And lib. 8. f. 16. b. When the first office is found against the King and the melius inquirendum also the King is bound nor to have any melius inquirendum for the same matter because there should be no end of it and that such writs might issue infinitely and infinity is condemned in law Nihil tam conveniens naturali aequitati quam voluntatem domini volentis suam rem in aliam transferre ratam haberi Bracton f. 18. God hath given to man all the land terram dedit filiis bominum So men by Gods endowment are made Lords of the land and what property a man hath in lands by law by the law of God also he hath dominion of it and therefore every man who is the lawfull owner of land may grant to what person in what manner and for what time it pleaseth him for if the land be subject to man then is it subject to his will for the will cometh from the mind which is the principall part of man because it directeth the body and all things he hath and if his land be subject to his will this his will is a sufficient consideration by which his land may pass as his will is and there is no greater consideration then the will Ployd f. 308. b. And nothing is more agreeable to naturall equity then to ratify the will of the Lord willing to transferr his substance and estate over to another And therefore at the common law the intention and will of the parties was the direction of uses for they were onely determinable and to be adjudged by the Chancellor which is the Court of conscience and equity and there is nothing more agreeable to equity then that the will of the Lord or owner and the meaning of the parties should direct the uses 31. H. 16. Tit. subpaena Fitz. 23. A man being ceste que use and having one sole daughter declared his intent and meaning to the Feoffees that after his decease his daughter should have his land and for it question was made in the Chancery whether the limitation of that use made to the daughter might be revoked and in reasoning of that case Fortescue held opinion that if ceste que use had issue a daughter and being sick declared his intention to his feoffee that his daughter shall have his land after his decease and after hee recovered his health he had issue a sonne now saith hee it is good conscience the sonne should have the Subpaena because hee is heire for conscientia dicitur a conset scio quasi simul scire cum Deo that is to know the will of God so neere as reason will and the intention of the parties is to direct the uses according to a conscionable and benigne construction Coke l. 1. f. 100. a. b. vide ibidem plura As a gift in taile may bee made upon condition that tenant in taile may alien for the profits of his issue and good and hee may alien notwithstanding the Statute of W. 2. because in that case voluntas donatoris observatur The will of the Donor is observed Coke com 224. b. If Lands be given to B. and his heires Habendum to him and the heires of his body or if given to him and the heires of his body Habendum to him and his heires he hath estate taile and a fee expectant but if Lands bee given to B. and his heires if B. have heires of his body and if he die without heires of his body that it shall revert to the Donor it is an estate taile and the reversion in the Donor for voluntas donatoris in charta doni sui manifeste expressa est observanda The will of the Donor manifestly expressed in the Charter of the gift is to be observed Coke com f. 21. a. If a common person doth without consideration give to I. S. his goods indefinitely all his goods doe pass 21. E. 4. 25. Alba of Waltams case by Brown and Genny If the King doe grant to one lands ex mero motu and though his Highnesse doth rehearse some consideration in the patent of his grant which is not true as if the consideration bee that whereas the Grantee hath done his Majesty good service on the Sea or beyond the Sea or in his Wars though the consideration bee meerely supposed and therefore no good consideration in Law yet the words ex mero motu doe make the Grant good 26 H. 8. 1. by Fitz. And if a common person doe by deed
flyeth to the wall or to some other unpassable place to save his life and upon the pursuit of the other he killeth him this is man-slaughter in his own defence 3. E. 3.284 From morall Philosophy NExt in order succeeedeth morall Philosophy the exact knowledge of which as Picolonomy Inductio ad libros Civil Philos cap. 6. cannot be comprehended without the precognition of the naturall and therefore hath the precedency for the morall faculty doth instruct men to avoid vices and to cure the maladies of the mind which cannot be compleatly accomplished without the naturall contemplation of the affections of the soul it is called Ethica by the Phylosopher or institutions of manners by which the oblique manners of men are rectified and their Enormities regulated and certainly from such exorbitances of manners originally proceeded the institutions of Lawes and from whence as Doderidge all Laws are in generalty derived for in the primary age which may rather be named the Iron then the golden age when men lived like beasts Dod. English Lawyer f. 250. the one praying on the other according to the censure of the Philosophicall Poet. Quod praedae obtulerat fortuna cuique ferebat Sponte sibi quisque valere vivere doctus What fortune offered for a pray each one Layd claime to it learned to live alone And serve himselfe Then were Laws first excogitated to suppresse the barbarous Savageness of such humane beasts and to reduce them to a more civill association as the Venusine Poet rightly Jura inventa metu injusti fateare necesse est Tempora si fastosque velis evolvere mundi If we revolve the Annalls of mans time From the worlds birth we must confesse and find That Laws were founded for feare of the unjust Seeing then Laws were introduced from the depraved judgements and corrupt manners of men who will not acknowledge that the science by which they are formed and the principles deduced from it are requisite and materiall to the fundamentall knowledge of the Law From which Fountaine our Law doth draw these grounds and maximes Illud possumus quod jure possumus Reg. I.C. We can doe that which by right we can doe for as Boetius potentia non est nisi ad bonum ability and power is not but to good for the power to have liberty to doe wrong is not by such liberty augmented but diminished potentia injuriae est impotentia naturae the power to doe injury is the impotency of nature as to decay and dye is no power but in respect of the privation and diminution in the thing is rather impotency as the Angells and Saints confirmed in glory and cannot sin are more powerfull then man who through his impotency can sin So a King ruling royally and with whom whatsoever shall please him hath the power of a Law and may doe what evill he lift is more impotent then he that doth all according to the rule and square of Law and therefore doth the Law give this rule Illud Rex solum potest quod de jure potest Coke l. 3. 99. f. 123. l. 1. 11. f. 7. Solum Rex hoc non potest quod non potest injuste agere The King onely can doe that which by right he can doe and the King can onely not doe this that he cannot doe any thing unjustly as 4. E. 4. 15. the King can be no disseisor he can be no wrong doer so if the King granterh and releaseth the services to the tenant and his heires that shall not extinct the tenure in all for necessity of the tenure and the King cannot by his charter alter the Law and therefore it shall be expounded as neere to the intention of the King as may be and that is to extinguish all the services but it onely which is incident inseperably to every tenure and that is fealty for it the King cannot doe by Law Coke l. 9. f. 123. a. And Coke l. 11. f. 72. a. The King shall not be exempt by construction of Law out of the generall words of Acts made to suppresse wrong because he is the Fountaine of Justice and common right and the King being Gods Lievtenant cannot doe wrong and with it accordeth 13. E. 4. 8. in the case of Alton woods l. 1. f. 41. So Lands were given to Henry the seventh and the heires males of his body and the question was whether the King in regard that he was not expresly restrained by the Act of 13. E. 3. de donis conditionalibus post prolem masculam sussitatum might alien or no and it was adjudged he could not alien but was restrained by the said Act for it were an hard argument to grant that the Statute which restraineth men to doe wrong and evill shall permit liberty to the King to doe it Ployd f. 246. Signior Barklys case Coke ibidem vide plura Potestas regis juris est non in juriae cum sit author juris non debet inde injuriarum masci occasio unde jura mascuntur Bract. l. 2. The Kings power is of right and not injury and as he is the author of right there ought not from thence to arise occasion of injury from whence rights proceed As if one who intendeth to sell his Land and by fraude conveyed it by deed enrolled to the King to the intent to deceive the purchaser and then he selleth the Land to another for a valuable consideration maketh conveyance accordingly in this case the purchaser shal enjoy the land against the Queen by the Statute of 27. Eliz. c. 4. For though the Queen be not excepted yet the act being general made in suppressing of fraud shall bind the Queen So if tenant in tail be seised of Land the remainder over in tail or in fee and he in the remainder knowing that tenant in tail will alien the Land and by recovery bar his remainder to the intent to deprive the tenant in tail of his birth-right and power that the Law hath given him to bar the remainder and of intent and purpose to deceive the purchaser granteth his reversion to the Queen by deed enrolled and then tenant in tail for a valuable consideration alieneth the Land by common recovery and dyeth without issue the purchaser shall enjoy the Land against the Queene by the Statute of 27. Eliz. the words of which are that every conveyance c. made c. to the intent and of purpose to deceive a purchaser t. shal be deemed onely against such purchaser c. to be utterly void vide ibidem plura in Magdalen Colledges case l. 2. in Cholmlys case f. 51.52 And the King hath a prerogative above all his Subjects that where by fraude or salse suggestion he is deceived that he in that case shall avoid his owne grant jure regio 22. E. 3. 47. in the Earle of Kents case Stanf. pr. regis 84. a. As the King can neither doe himselfe injury nor others And
affectum tribuit delinquendi minatur innocentes qui parcit nocentibus Coke l. 4. f. 45. a. Evil doings ought not to go unpunished because impunity ministreth a continuall affection of offending and he threatneth the innocent who spareth the Delinquent And Aristotle Pol. 7. Actiones justitiae sunt necessariae in civitate licet non eligibiles Though the actions of Justice that is the sentences and punishments of evill and condemned persons are not secundum se of their own nature eligible yet are they necessary in a City that the City may be the better ruled and saved for as Solon there are two things and tyes by which a Common-wealth is contained and preserved praemium poena reward and punishment and it is truly said Etsi meliores sunt quos ducit amor tamen plures sunt quos corrigit timor Thoughâ— they be the better persons whom the Love of goodness vertue draweth yet there are more whom the fear of punishment doth deter and correct and therefore the wisdome of our Law doth abhor that greater offences should pass unpunished So as that if a man be convict either of verdict or by confession upon an insufficient Indictment and no Judgment upon it given he may again be indicted and arraigned because his life was never in jeopardy and the Law wanteth his end which provideth that no evill Deeds should pass unpunished Coke l. 4. f. 45. a. for as Coke saith l. 5. f. 53 b. Oderunt peccare mali formidine penae The wicked to offend themselves refrain And from the same are scar'd for feare of pain And therefore by the Common Law is the offence of felony so severely punished and though the Judgment against such a Malefactor in that he shal be hanged by the neck untill he be dead yet implicitively he is punished First in his wife that she shall lose her Dower Secondly in his Children that they shall become base and ignoble Thirdly that he shall lose his Posterity for his blood is stained and corrupted that they cannot inherit to him or to any other Ancestor Fourthly that he shall forfeit all his Lands and Tenements which he hath in fee or in tail or for term of his life And fifthly all his Goods and Chattels And the reason was that men should fear to commit Feloâ—y ut poena ad paucos metus ad omnes perveniat that the punishment might be inflicted on few and the feare may come to all But some Acts of Parliament have altered the common Law in some of these points as by the Statute De donis conditionalibus lands in tail were not forfeited neither for Felony nor for Treason but for the life of Tenant in tail And this Law continued in force from the thirteenth year of Edward the first untill the twenty sixth year of Henry the eighth when by Act of Parliament Estates in tail are forfeited by attainder of high Treason but as for Felons the Statute De donis Conditionalibus doth still remain in force so as for attainder of Felony Lands and Tenements in tail are not forfeited but onely during the life of Tenant in tail but the Inheritance is preserved for the Issues but being attainted of high Treason or Petit treason the wife shall not be received to demand her Dower but in certain cases specially provided for Ployd f. 195. Coke com f. 392. a. b. And now the wife of a person attainted of misprision of Treason Murthâ—r or Felony is dowable by the Statute of 5 E. 6. c. 〈◊〉 c. in that case made and provided which is more favourable to the women then the Common Law was Coke ibidem Receditur a placitis Juris potius quam injuâ—iae delicta maneant impunita Bac. Max. f. 51. The Law will dispence with some grounds of the Law rather then crimes and wrongs should be unpunished quia salus populi suprema lex the safety of the people is the supream Law and the safety of the people is contained in the repressing of offences by punishment It is a positive ground that the accessory in Felony cannot be proceeded against untill the principall be tried yet if a man by subtility and malice set a mad man by some device to kill one and he doth so now forasmuch as the mad man is excused because he cannot have any will or malice the Law accounteth the Incitor as principall though he be absent rather then the Crime shall go unpunished 13 Eliz 1. So it is a ground in the Law that the appeal of Murther goeth not to the Heire where the party murthered hath a wife nor the younger brother where there is an elder yet if the wife murther the husband because she is the party Offendor the appeal leapeth over to the heire and so if the Son and Heir murther his Father it goeth to the second brother Ed. 4 M 28. 6. Stanf. l. 2 f. 60. But if the Rule be one of the higher sort of Maximes that are regulae rationales and not positivae then the Law will endure rather a particular Offence to escape without punishment then violate such a Rule As it is a Rule that penall Statutes shall not be taken by equity And the Statute of 1 E. 6. enacteth that those that are attainted for stealing of Horses shall not have their Clergy The Judge conceived that this should not extend to him that should steal but one horse and therefore procured a new act for it in 2 E. 6. c. 33. for it is not like the case upon the Statute of Gloucester that gâ—â—â—â—h an action of waste against him for term of life or years and yet if a man hold for a year he is within the Statute for penall Lawes are taken strictly and litterally onely in the point of defining and setting down the fact and punishment and in those clauses that concern them and not in generall words which are but circumstances and conveyances in the putting of the case and so note the diversity for if the Law be that for such an offence a man shall lose his right hand and the Offendor hath his right hand cut off in the Wars he shall not lose his left hand but the crime shall rather pass unpunished vide ibidem plura Nemo punitur pro alieno delicto Coke com f. 145. b. No man is punished for another mans fault And therefore the Defendant in a Replevin cannot claim property by his Bayliff or Servant and the reason is for that if the claim fall out to be false he shall be fined for his contempt which the Lord cannot be unless he maketh claim himself for no man shall be punished for anothers fault Dyer f. 66. pl. 14. It is the Law of God that every one shall bear his own burthen and receive judgment according to his proper fact and merit whether it be good or evill As whereas the Plaintiff chargeth the Defendants with an escape made and suffered by them they ought not to accuse
the poor and the twenty pounds to the Queen and therefore doth the Statute of 3 Jac. c. 4. give a more speedy remedy for the said twelve pence yet shall they not be punished but upon one of them Yet when the latter affirmative Statute is contrary to the precedent Statute in matter the former abrogateth the latter as by the Statute of 33 H 8. c. 23 it is enacted that if any person being examined before the Councell of the King or three of them shall confess any Treason misprision of Treason or Murther or be to them vehemently suspected he shall be tried in any County where the King pleaseth by his Commission and after by the Statute of 1 2 P. M. c. 10. it was enacted That all trialls hereafter to be had for any Treason shall be had according to the course of the Common Law and not otherwise That latter act and though the latter words had not been had abrogated the first because they were contrary in matter But that doth not abrogate the Statute of 34 H. 8. c 2. of the triall of Treasons beyond the Seas notwithstanding the words are in the negative because it was not contrary in matter for it was not triable by the Common Law Dyer 132. Stanf. 89. 90. So the Statute of 1 E. 6. of Chanteries being in the affirmative doth alter the Statute of H. 2. c. 41. which giveth a Cessavit cantaria also in the affirmative for the one is contrary to the other in matter vide plura Coke l. 9. f. 63. a. But whensoever Lawes are contrary in quality that is where the first is a materiall or express affirmative and the latter an express or materiall negative and when the first is a materiall or express negative and latter affirmative there the latter Law doth abrogate the former As the Statute of 5 E. c 4. which prohibiteth every person to use or exercise any craft mystery or occupation unless he hath been an Apprentice for seven years doth alter the Common Law by which any one may in any manner worke in any lawfull Trade without any service precedent for without an Act of Parliament no man can be restrained to worke in any Trade Coke l 11. f. 54. a. in the Taylors of Ipsiches case And to conclude to this Argument with the generall ground given by Sir Edward Coke l. 1. 11. f. 67. a. That for that Acts of Parliament are established with such gravity and wisdome and the universall consent of all the Realme they ought not through any strained construction out of the generall and ambiguous words of a subsequent Act be abrogated as where the Statute of 16. R 23 c. 5. enacteth that all the Lands and Tenements of any one attainted in a Praemunire shall be forfeited to the King in the case of one Prudgion Pasch 21. Eliz. being tenant in taile of certaine Lands and Tenements who was attainted of a Praemunire the question before all the Judges of England was whether the estate taile was a bar or no and it was resolved by all the Justices that those generall words had not repealed the Statute de donis conditionalibus but that onely he shall forfeite them for his life and that the issue in taile should inherit vide ibidem plura Lex non patetur fractiones divisiones Statuum Coke l. 1. f 87. a. The Law will not suffer fractions and divisions of estates As if a man make a lease for life upon condition that if he doth not pay twenty pounds that another shall have the Land that future limitation is void Ployd f. 25. c. M. 18. H. 8. 3. And if after the Statute of 1. R. 3. before the Statute of 27. H. 8. A man had made a Feoffment to the use of one for life or in taile and after to the use of another for life or en-taile and after to the use of another in fee they in the Remainder might not make a Feoffment nor grant their estates by the generall words of that act for then there should be a fraction and division of estates which the Law will not suffer vide ibidem plura in Corbets case Coke l. 3. f. 32. b. If a man be seised of a Mannor to which a Leet waife or stray or any other hereditament which is not of any annuall value is appendant or appurtenant there by a devise of the Mannor with the appurtenances those shall passe as incidents to the Mannor for in that the Statute enableth him by expresse words to devise the Mannor by consequence it enableth him to devise the Mannor with all incidents and appendants to it and it was never the meaning or the intention of the makers of the Statute that when the Devisor hath power to devise the principall that he shall not have power to devise it that was incident and appendant to it but that the Mannor c. shall be dismembred and fractions made of things which by legall prescription have been united and annexed together Ibidem for the Law will not permit such factions in Estates Coke com f. 147. b. If a man hath a rent-charge issuing out of certaine Land and he purchaseth any part of the Land to him and his heires the whole rent-charge is extinct because the rent is entire and against common right and issuing out of every part of the Land and therefore by purchase of part is extinct in the whole and cannot be apportioned Coke com 309. b. If the reversion be granted of three acres and the Lessee agree to the said grant for one acre this is good for all three and so it is of an Attornement in Law if the reversion of three acres be granted and the Lessee surrender one of the Acres to the Grantee this Attornement shall be good for the whole Reversion of the three Acres according to the grant Apices juris non sunt jura Coke com f. 2 83. b. nimia subtilitas reprobatur in Lege Coke l. 4. 4â— b. The Law of England respecteth the effect and substance of the matter and not every nicity of forme or circumstance and too much subtility is reproved in the Law As it was alledged for an exception in the Enditement that the Enditement was taken before I. S. Coronatore in comitatu praedicto and not de comitatu praedicto or comitatus praedicti and every Coroner of one County is a Coroner in every County of England but not of every County but it was not allowed for the Coroner in the County c. shall in all reasonable intendement be taken for the Coroner of the County and so it is used in the Writ de coronatore elegendo ibidem vide plura Coke l. 5. f. 120. 122. It is a rule in Law that Enditements ought to be certaine but there are three manner of certainties the first is to a common intent and that sufficeth in Bars which are to defend the party and excuse him the second is to a generall
intent which is required in Inditements Counts and Replications c. for that they are to excuse or charge the party the third is a certaine intent to every particular and this certainty is rejected in Law for nimia subtilitas in jure reprobatur and such certainty confoundeth certainty vide ibidem plura in Longs case Coke l. 8. f 56. b. Whereas the Queen granted a Mannor to B. and his heires to have and to hold the said Mannor to B. and his assignes omitting the words heires in the Habeâ—dum it was resolved in Auditor Kings case by the whole Court that the fee of the Mannor passed by the Premisses of the Letters Patents and that the Habendum was void for the Premisses were certaine enough to passe the Fee-simple and the omission of his heires in the Habendum shall not subvert it was certaine in the Premisses for the intention of the Queen appeareth to passe the Fee-simple by the Premisses and her grant ought to be interpreted in intentionem non in deceptionem Regis and when as a litterall and strict construction is made to make his grant void contrary to the intention of the King it soundeth in deceite of the King and it is a great indignity to him for nicities in Law to make his Charter under the great Seale of England of things which may be lawfully granted void and of none effect for Apices juris non sunt jura and it was said by Coke Lord cheife Justice and affirmed by the other Justices that of latter times such nice and strict constructions have been strayned by some of Letters Patents to subvert the force and effect of them that many good Letters Patents are drawn into question to the dishonor of the King and disinherison of the Subject contrary to the true reason and ancient rule of Law for as it is said Co. l. 4. f. 5. b. Simplicitas legibus amica Coke l. 10. f. 125. b. In the Mayor c. of Lynns case it is said that untill these latter times it was never read in any of our Books that any body politick or corporate did endeavour or attempt by any suite to avoid any of their Leases Grants and Conveyances made to them by the misnaming of the very name of the Corporation but God forbid that their Leases and Grants should be defeated for every curious and nice misnomer vide ibidem plura in the Mayor c. of Linns case where it was adjudged that a bond made to the Mayor and Burgesses of Linn was good though therein was omitted the Burrough of Kings Linn which was their name given them by their Patent because it was idem re sensu though not idem litteris Syllabis Fortior potentior est dispositio Legis quam hominis Coke com f. 224. a. The disposition of the Law is of more force and stronger then the disposition of man If a man grant to another by his deed the office of a Parkship of a Park to have and occupy the said office for terme of life he hath an estate in that office upon condition in Law to wit that the Parker shall well and lawfully keep the said Parke and shall doe that which to such office appertaineth to doe or otherwise it shall be well lawfull to the Grantor and his heires to oust him and grant it to another and such a condition in Law annexed to a thing is as strong as if the condition had been put in wrting Littleton ibidem If a man hath title to enter upon tenant in taile if he maketh a claime to the land then is the estate taile defeated for this claime is an entry made by him and is of the same effect in Law and if the tenant in taile after such claime continueth his occupation that is a disseisin to him that made such claime and as often as his adversary doth wrong and injury to him so often may he bring a Writ of Trespasse or a Quare clausum fregit for the wrong disseisin Littleton whereby it appeareth that continuall claime which is an entry in Law is as strong as an entry in deed Coke com f. 236. b. Coke com f. 338. a. A surrender in Law in some cases is of greater force then a surrender in deed as if a man maketh a lease for yeares to begin at Michaelmas next this future interest cannot be surrendred because there is no reversion wherein it may be drowned that by a surrender in Law it may be drowned as if the Lessee before Michaelmas take a new Lease for yeares either to begin presently or at Michaelmas this is a surrender in Law of the former lease and in this case Fortior aequior est dispositio legis quam hominis Coke l. 10. f. 67. b. 37. H. 6. 16. And if the Lessees be a corporation aggregated of many so as they cannot make an expresse surrender without deed in writing under their seale yet they can by act in Law surrender their terme without any writing So if the Prior by consent of the Covent maketh a Lease for yeares rendring rent if the prior by Deed expresly releaseth the rent and dyeth the Successor shall recover the arrerages but if the Prior oust the Lessee and dyeth that discharge in Law shall discharge the rent which incurreth during the ouster against the Successor 34. H. 6. 21. Coke l. 10. f. 67. If an heire within age assigne more dower then he ought to have done yet the guardian in right may have a Writ of Admeasurement of dower but if he grant over his estate his Assignee which is guardian in faire shal not have the Writ because it was a thing in action given to the Lessor F. N. B. 149. 9. Coke l. 6. 38. b. When a Deed is requisite ex institutione legis it ought to be shewn though it be collaterall and convey nothing as a Mayor and Comminalty Tenant Pur autre vie if he attorne to the Grantee in reversion the Law requireth that it be done by deed and that in pleading the deede of Attornement be shewen but when it is requisite ex provisione hominis not as when a man maketh a Lease for yeares of Land to A. upon condition that he shall not assigne it over but by deed onely and not by word in this case ex provisione hominis the Assignement ought to be by deed but because ex institutione legis the Deed is not necessary to the Assignee he may plead the Assignement without shewing of the Deed and in quo minus by the fermor of the King he ought to alledge that he is a fermor of the King to enable him to sue there but he need not shew it to the Court because a collaterall action ibidem So the Collector shall not shew it 22. H. 6. 42. neither shall the Sub-Collector shew it 21. E. 4. 50. And the Devisor shall not shew the Testament for it appertaineth to the Executor 4. Ass 20. One Parcener
may have a Quare impedit against another if shee be disturbed of her presentment by turne so cannont Joyn-tenants or tenants in common F. N. B. 34 I. For equality of partition among Coparceners a rent granted shall be a Fee-simple without the word heires Coke com f. 10. a. Coke com 102. a. Homage ancestrell is a speciall Warranty in Law and the Lands generally which the Lord hath at the time of the Voucher shall be lyable to execution in value whether he hath them by descent or purchase but in the case of an expresse warranty the heire shall be charged onely with such Lands as he hath by descent from the same Ancestor so in this case Firmior potentior est operatio legis quam dispositio hominis Lease upon condition that if it happen that the Lessee make any wast in or upon the Premisses it shall be lawfull for the Lessor to re-enter and the Lessee suffereth the house to fall in default of covering and reparations Dyer and Wash said that the Lessor might re-enter for such wast is punishable by the statute of Gloucester for destructionem facere in domibus Dyer 281. b. and so it is if he suffer wast to be done by a stranger Doct. Stud. l. 2. c. 4. yet if the Tenant had been bound in an Obligation that he shall do no wast he shall not forfeit his Bond by the wast of a stranger for greater is the operation of the Law c. A man is seised of three Mannors of equall value and taketh a wife and she taketh one entire Mannor for her Dower which is charged with a rent she shall hold it charged otherwise it is if she had recovered her Dower by a Writ of Dower and had had a third part of each assigned to her Inutilis labor sine fructu non est effectus legis Non licet quod dispendio licet Sapiens incipit a fine Et lex non praecipit in utilia Coke com f. 127. b. The Law commandeth no vain chargeable and unprofitable things As a Villain by the Law shall not have an appeal of Mayhem against his Lord for in an appeal the Mayhem man shall onely recover damages and if the Villain in this case recovereth damages against his Lord and thereupon hath execution the Lord may take it that the Villain hath in execution from the Villain and so the recovery void inutilis labor stultus and unprofitable labour is foolish and idle which the Law prescribeth not Coke com f. 197. a. Tenants in Common of an Hawk and an Horse shall joyn in Assise for otherwise they would be without remedy for one of them cannot make his plaint in an Assise of the Moyety of an Hawk or Horse because the Law will never inforce a man to demand that which he cannot recover as the Moyety of an Hawk or an Horse or any other entire thing for Lex neminem cogit ad vana in utilia Coke com f. 319. b. If a Lease be made for term of life the remainder to another in tail the remainder over to the right Heirs of the Tenant for life and Tenant for life granteth his remainder in fee to another by his Deed the remainder shall presently pass without any Attornment for none can atturn but himself and it were in vain that he should atturn upon his own Grant for quod vanum est lex non requirit Coke l. 5. 84. a. Where a man is in custody of the Sheriff by process of Law and after another Writ is delivered to him to take the body of him who is in custody presently he is in his custody by force of the second Writ by judgment of Law although he make not an actuall arrest of him for to what purpose shall he be arrested of him who is and was before in his custody for the Law prescribeth no fruitless things Actus legis nemini facit injuriam Coke com 178. a The Act of Law doth injury to none As if the land out of which a rent-charge is granted be recovered by an elder Title and thereby the rent-charge is voided yet the Grantee shall have a Writ of Annuity because the rent-charge is avoided by course of Law So if Tenant for another mans life grant a rent-charge by Deed to one for one and twenty years Cestuy que use dieth the rent-charge is determined yet may the Grantee have during the years a Writ of Annuity for the arrearages incurred after the death of Cestuy que use because the rent-charge did determine by the act of God and course in Law which wrong no man ibid. Coke l. 5. f. 87. a. If the Defendant in debt dieth in execution the Plaintiff shall have a new execution by Elegit or Fieir facias because otherwise the Plaintiff should lose his debt without any default in him and the act of God and the act in Law will not prejudice any one Trewgrijard being a Burgess of the Parliament who was taken upon an Exigent post capias and yet upon his Writ of priviledge of Parliament the Sheriff let him go at large for the King and the Realm hath an interest in the body of every Subject and the Common-wealth shall be preferred yet the party of the Parliament may be taken in execution again after the Plaintiff shall not be prejudiced in his execution by the act of Law which doth no man wrong neither is the Sheriff chargeable because his Office consists chiefly in the execution and service of writs and is sworn to do it Dyer 60. Lex plus respicit acta sine verbis quam verba sine actis Coke l. 3. f. 26. The Law respecteth more acts without words then words without acts As at the Common Law if lands be given to Baron and Feme in taile or in fee and the Baron dieth there the Feme cannot devest the Frank-Tenement out of her by any verball waiver or disagreement in pais as if before any entry made by her she saith that she waiveth and altogether disagreeth to the said state and that she never will take or accept of it yet the Frank-tenement remaineth in her and she may enter when she pleaseth and waive it in Court of Record for the Law more respecteth Acts without words then words without Acts and therefore if she entreth and taketh the profits although she say nothing it is a good agreement in Law And so it is adjudged in Mich. 34 E. 1. Avowry 232. That if a man take a distress for one thing yet when he cometh in Court of Record he may make an Avowry for what thing he pleaseth a multo fortiori when a Frank-tenement is vested in him it cannot be devested by nude words in pais and with it accordeth 17 E 3. 6. 17. Where the Baron alieneth his lands and retaketh the estate to him and his wife in taile the Baron dieth the Lord of whom the land was holden by Knights-service supposing that the Baron died sole
generall words imply no certainty and with that accordeth 21. E. 4. If a man be bound to be nonsued in all Actions that he hath against him in the Common Bench he may say that he hath no action therein otherwise if the condition be particular to wit that he shall be non-sued in a Formedon c. so as that it appeareth that generall words imply no certainty neither do they conclude any person to say that he hath nothing there vide ibidem plura Cok. lib. 8.78 a. Bospols Case In an arbitrament when the submission is generall of all Actions and Demands c. that may well stand with the generality of the words that there was but one cause depending in controversy between them For generall speeches imply no certainty and the awaâ—d for one is good notwithstanding the generality of the words for though there were many matters in controversy yet if one onely was made known to the Arbitrator he may make an award of it For the Arbitrator is in place of a Judge and his office is to determine secundum alligata probata the duty of the parties which are greived and know their particular greifes is to make known the causes of controversy to the Arbitrator for they are privy to them and the Arbitrator is a stranger and every one is to do that which lyeth in his knowledge but when the condition is in speciall and with a proviso and condition that an award shall be made of the premises or words which amount to so much there the Arbitrator ought to make Arbitrement of all or else the award is void Generalibus semper specialia derogant Reg. f. c. Derg 180. Quando charta continet generalem clausulam posteaque descenâ—it ad verba specialia quae clausulae generali sunt consentanea interpretanda est charta secundum verba specialia f. 134. b. in Edward Althams Case Which rule is almost word for word put and agreed of by both parties In. 7. E. 3. f. 10. Margery Mortimers Case to wit where a Deede speaketh by general words and then descendeth to special words if the words special agree with the words general the deed shall be understood according to the words speciall As if a man grant a rent in the mannor of P. to be taken in an hundred Acres of Land parcell of that Mannor with a clause of distresse in those hundred Acres the Rent shall issue out of the hundred Acres onely and the generall words shall be construed according to the words speciall so if a man grant a Rent and go no further those generall words shall create an estate for life but if the Habâ—ndum be for years that shall qualify the words generall 7. E. 3. So if a man give Lands to one and his Heirs Habendum to him and the Heirs of his body He shall have onely an estate tayle and no fee expectant for the Habendum qualifieth the generall words precedent Ployd f. 541. a. A man maketh a Feoffment by Deede to one to have and to hold to him and his Heirs and if it happen that the feoffee dyeth without heire of his body that then the Land shall revert The generality of that gift to him and his Heires shall be corrected by the speciall branch after so as the Donee shall have but an estate tayle 13. R. 2. in Formedon Dyer 261. b. A man seised in fee deviseth all his Lands in one village and in one of the two Hamlets by name and there were two Hamlets in the said Village The opinion of divers Justices was that none of the Lands in the other Hamlet should passe for it is intendable that the intent and meaning of the devisor was that nothing more should passe then what he had expressed A. acknowledgeth a fine of the mannor of P. with an advowson and regrants the mannor with the Appurtenances the advowson shall not passe Temp. E. 1. F. title grants Ployd 173. b. If I give or lease all my Lands to one and stay there he shall have all my Lands in England but if I say further in the manner of Dale there it is now restrained but if the specialty limiteth a thing which is void and so appeareth it is otherwise as if I lease to one all my Lands in Dale which I have by descent of the part of my mother and in truth I have no Lands in Dale which I have by descent of the part of my mother if the Lessor have other Lands in Dale he shall not have those Ployd 160. a. A man giveth Lands to two Habendum to one for life and after his decease to the other and his Heirs the one shall have the entierly for his life onely notwithstanding the Joynture given in the Premisses by the better opinion in terme M. 8. E 3.427 Generalibus sempâ—r specialia insunt Reg. f. c. Specialls are alwayes contained in the generals and the universalls allwayes comprehend the particularâ— Ployd f. 68. a. The plurall number containeth the singular and more and therefore was it resolved by all the Judges That a pretensed right and title was within the penalty of the Statute of 32. H. 8. for the buying of pretensed rights and titles for pretensed rights and titles in the plurall number did containe a pretensed right and title in the singular number And whereas the Statute of 5 R. 2. c. 5. forbiddeth that none make entry into any Lands or Tenements unlesse in case where entry is given by the Law yet if one enter into a Tenement he shall be punished though the Statute speaketh in the plurall number and likewise whereas the Statute of 1. H. 5. speaketh of false Deeds in the plural number yet if one bring but one false Deed he shall be punished by the Statute as it is holden in many Bookes Ployd f. 467. b. The Statute of Gloucester giveth an Action of Waste against him which holdeth for years which is spoken in the plural number yet may it be taken for him which holdeth for a year or half a yeare vide ibidem plura Generalis clausula non porrigitur ad ea quae sunt specialiter comprehenfa Coke l. 8. 118. b. It is a ground and maxime in the Law that a generall clause is not extended to those things which are specially comprehended Doctor Bonhams Case by the Statutes of 10 14. H. 8. it was enactd that no man should exercise the faculty of Physike within the City of London or within seven miles of the said City unlesse he be admitted thereunto by the President and Colledge of the faculty of Physike and there is another speciall clause contained in the said Acts that any who evilly and not well exercise the said faculty c. shall be punished by Fine and imprisonment c. and it was adjudged that the said generall clause that none should exercise the said faculty of Physike unlesse he be admitted c shall not be extended to the speciall clause
proferentem accipienda sunt Bacon Eliz. f. 11. As if I demise omnes boscos meos in villa de Dale for years this passeth the soile 14. H. 8.28 H. 8. Dyer 17. And if I sowe my Land with Corne and let it for for yeares the Corne passeth to my Lessee And if I grant ten pounds rent to Baron and Feme and if the Baron dye the Feme shall have three pounds rent because these words rest ambiguous whether I intend three pounds by way of addition or three pounds by way of deduction out of the rent of ten pounds it shall be taken strongest against me that it is three pounds addition to the ten pound of which more hereafter So Coke fol. 303. b. Ambiguum placitum interpretari debet contra proferentem An ambiguous Plea shall be taken strongest against the pleader for every one is presumed to make the best of his own Case and Coke l. 10. f. 50. Ambigua responfio contra proferentem est accipienda the Bishop of Sarums Case vide ibidem In obscuris secundum magis similius est judicandum vel quod plerumque inspici solet Regula I. C. and Coke l. 4.13 14. Sensus verborum ex causa dicendi accipiendus est sermones semper accipiendi secundum subjectam materiam In obscure and dark sayings we are to judge according to that which is most likely and which is wont to be and the sense of the words is to be collected from the cause of the speech and to be taken according to the subject of the matter which rule seemeth to qualify and moderate the other two vide ibidem S. Cromwells Case as first in words the Plaintiff bringeth an action upon the case for calling of him Murderer to which the Defendant said that as he was speaking with the Plaintiff concerning unlawfull hunting the Plaintiff confessed that he had killed diverse Hares with Engins to which the Defendant answered that he was a murtherer innuendo a murtherer of Hares and it was resolved that the justification was good for upon an action of slander the likeliest sense of words is to be taken and collected out of the occasion of the speech Coke ibidem And so in Deeds as if I have a free Warren in my land and let my Land for life not mentioning the Warren yet the Lessee by implication shall have the Warren 32. H. 6. which is the more likely meaning for otherwise the Lessor would have excepted the Warren Vnivocum denoteth words of a certaine and distinct signification and expresseth the thing cleerly without any obscurity or Ambiguity of which the Law taketh especiall notice for that certainty in all contracts and conveyances is the cause of quiet and setlement of estates but incertainty is the author of variance and dissention from whence we have these notable grounds and maximes Misera est servitus ubi jus est vagum Coke l. 5. f. 42. a. God forbid that the inheritances of men should depend upon incertaines and it is a miserable servitude where the Law is wavering and therefore Ployd f. 28. a. In every Common-wealth it is necessary and requisite that things should bee certainely conveyed for certainty engendreth repose and incertainty contention The occasions of which contention our Law foreseeing hath prevented and therefore ordained that certaine ceremonies should be used in the transmutation of things from one man to another and namely of Frank-tenements which are of greatest estimation in our lawes to know the certaine times when things do passe and therefore in every Feoffment the Law ordeineth that livery and seisin shall bee made and in every grant of a reversion or rents that attornement should be made which are points certaine containing time wherefore it is well observed by Sir Edward Coke in his Preface to the second part of his Reports that in all his time there have not beene moved in the Courts of Justice of England two questions touching the rights of descent escheats or the like fundamentall points of the common-Law so certaine sure and without question are the principles and grounds thereof That as Sir John Davis in his preface there is no art nor science which standeth upon discourse and reason which hath her Rules and Maxims so certaine and infallible and so little subject to diverse interpretations as the common Law of England Whence Sir Edw. Coke is bold to pronounce that the Common Law of England is not incertaine in the abstract but in the concrete and that the incertainty thereof is hominis vitium non professionis the imperfection of man and not of the profession and lib. 6. f. 43. a. in particular blameth hee the subtile inventions imaginations of men in the practise of uses which have introduced many mischiefs inconveniences contrary to the ancient common law which hath certain rules to direct the estates and inheritances of men and therefore is it without comparison better to have Estates and Inheritances directed by the certaine rule of the common Law which harh beene the ancient true and faithfull servant to this Common-wealth then by incertaine imaginations and conjectures of any of those new inventors of uses without any approved ground of law or reason Coke l. 6. f. 43. a. And therefore in all cases law and equity will that incertainty bee avoided as the author of contention and that there bee an end of all controversies according to equity and right which is the finall intention of all Lawes Coke l. 8. 53. And Coke l. 1. f. 85. a. The Judges ought to know the intention of the parties by certaine and sensible words which are agreeable and consonant to the rules of Law as if Land bee given by deed to two to have and to hold to them and haeredibus it is void for the insensibility and incertainty and though it hath a clause of warranty to them and their heires that shall not make the first wordes which are incertaine and insensible to bee of force and effect in Law although his intent appeareth but his intent ought to bee declared by words certain and consonant to Law So Coke comment f. 20. b. If a man letteth Lands to A. for life the remainder to B. in taile the remainder to C. in forma praedicta the remainder is void for the incertainty And therefore Ployd f. 272. a. giveth this ground that every contract sufficient to make a Lease for yeares ought to have certainty in three limitations in the beginning of the terme in the continuance and in the end of the same all which ought to be known at the beginning of the Lease and the Lease that wanteth them Mr. Brown said is but bibble babble vide ibidem Fullers case and Coke l. 6. f. 35. the Bishop of Bathes case Ployd f. 14. a. If I give all my mony in my purse to I. S. hee cannot have an action for it unlesse hee alledge the certainty of it so as without certainety the action is not maintainable according to
renunciaverit amplius repetere non potest n. f. 139. a. As a Retraxit is a bar of all other actions of the like or inferior nature for he which once renounceth his action can no more renew it It is a generall rule that non-suite before appearance is not peremptory in any case for that a stranger may purchase a writ in the name of him who hath cause of action and regularly a non suit after appearance is not peremptory but that he may commence an action of like nature againe for it may be he hath mistaken something in that action or was not provided of his proofes or mistaken the day or the like But yet for some speciall reasons non-suit in some actions is peremptory as in a quare impedit if the Plaintiff bee non-suit after apparance the Defendant shall make a title and have a Writ to the Bishop and this is peremptory to the Plaintiff and is a good bar in another quare impedit and the reason is because the Defendant had by the judgement of the Court a writ to the Bishop and the incumbent which commeth in by that writ shall never be removed which is a flat barre as to that presentation and for the same law and upon the same reason so it is in the case upon a discontinuance Coke com f. 139. a. vide ibidem plura Actio personalis moritur cum persona a personall action dieth with the person Went. off of executors f. 1. 97. As if a keeper of a Prison suffereth one in execution to escape and dieth no action lyeth against his Executors If Lessee for yeares doth wast and dieth an Action of wast lyeth not against his Executor or Administrator for wast done before that time Coke com f. 53. b. so if the tenant doth wast and he in the reversion dieth the heire shall not have an Action of wast for the wast done in the life of his Ancestor nor the master of an Hospitall or a parson for wâ—st done in the life of the predecessor ibidem The Lessor covenants to pay quit rent during the terme and dieth his Executors shall not pay it because it is a personall covenant in the Lessor onely Dier 114. Yet if there be three copartners and they Lease the land and one of them die and hath issue and the Lessee commit wast and one of them die and hath issue the Aunt and the issue shall joyne in an Action of wast and the issue shall recover one moyety of the Land wasted and the Aunt the other notwithstanding that actio injuriarum moritur cum persona But in favorabilibus magis attenditur quod prodest quam quod nocet in indifferent and favourable things that which profiteth is more respected then that which hurteth Relatio tunc fieri non debet si per eam actus destruatur Reg. I. c. Decius 363. Quando dispositio referri potest ad duas res ita quod secundum relationeÌ„ una vitiatur secunduÌ„ aliaÌ„ utilis sit tunc facienda est relatio ad illam ut valeatdispositio semper ita fiat relatio ut valeat dispositio C. l. 6. f. 76. b. a. A relation then ought not to be when by it an Act is destroyed As in the statutes of 32. and 34. H. 8. concerning Wills whereof is provided that every person having any Mannors Lands c. holden in capite shall have full power c. to dispose by his last will in writing or otherwise by any Act or Acts lawfully executed in his life two parts of the same Mannor c. for the advancement of his wife preferment of his children and payment of his debt or otherwise at his will and pleasure any Law statute c. those words or otherwise at his wil pleasure have reference relation only to the last wil not to the acts executed for otherwise none might have devised two parts but onely for the advancement of his wife and preferment of his children or payment of his debts which is not the intention of the Act but that he may devise two parts to whom he will so that the third descend and it was in vaine to referre those words or otherwise at his will and pleasure to Acts executed for he can do that without any authority given to him by that act And therefore when the disposition may be referred to two things so as according to the relation one of them may be destroyed and according to the other shall be commodious then the relation is to be made to that that the disposition may be of force and alwayes the relation is so to be that the disposition may availe in Sir G. Cursons case So Coke l. 3. f. 28. b. Butler and Bakers case relation is a fiction in law to make a nullity of a thing from the beginning to a certaine intent which in truth had being and the rather for necessities sake ut res magis valeat quam pareat As if a man make a gift in taile to Baron and feme and afterwards grants the reversion of those Lands and since the Baron dies and the feme to have her dower waiveth and disagreeth to the estate taile now in regard of her it is a nullity of the estate from the beginning and to such an intent the Law faineth that the estate was onely made to the baron but as to the grant of the reversion that is a collaterall Act and her refusall shall not have such relation for she may be endowed though that estate stand and so no necessity and therefore without necessity ut res magis valeat the Law will not faine any nullity but in a destruction of a loyall estate vested the law will never make any fiction vide ibidem plura So relation shall make things have been as if as if they never had been 1. H. 7. 16 The husband disagreeth to a Feoffement made by his wife it is void from the beginning so that he may plead ne infeosse pas so 14. H. 8. 10. A devise is that the Executors may sell land c. when they sell all meane charges made by the heire in the interim shall be avoided by relation to the time of the death of the Testator so 14. H. 8 18. I disseise A. to the use of B. the dissiesee releaseth to mee and then B. agreeth with the disseisee this agreement by relation shall be as if he had agreed before the release and so shall defeat it Jurors alien their Lands away between the teste of the Writ of attaint and judgement yet they shall be charged to the King for the estreptment by relation 22. E. 3. 16. Caufe of Assise brought for rescuing a distresse taken for rent and then an Office is found which entitleth the King who seiseth the Land and then an Ouster le maine is sued the Assise is gone for ever because the King shall be said to be in possession at the time of the rescous
amercement is pardoned vide ibidem The husband and wife make a lease by Deed the husband dyeth the wife accepteth the rent if the Lessee lose the Deed of the Lease the wife shall avoid it 15. E. 4. 17. Coke l. 1. f. 2. Buchuâ—sts case If the Feoffor make a Feoffment with warranty the Feoffee shall not have the Charters unlesse by expresse grant but the Feoffor shall have all the Charters and Evidences which are materiall for the maintenance of the title of the Land and upon which he may maintain his warranty paramount but if the warranty be determined he shall have them no longer Ployd f. 382. a. Nevills case The King grants to two for their lives and the life of the survivor of them the Sheriff-wike of Chester and one of them was attainted of high Treason all the Office was forfeited because the Office was entire and could not be severed ibidem The King granteth the Office of the keeper of a Parke to two and the one faileth in discharge of his duty the whole fee shall determine so it is if an annuity be granted to two for Counsell and one of them refuse because the Office and Grant is entire and cannot be severed and the cause ceasing but in one the whole annuity shall cease Exception Dyer 320. Pl. 13. An Arbitrement was between two of diverse things and among others there was one article that one party should have yearly for the space of six yeares twenty shillings toward the keeping and honest education of A. B. and A. B. dyeth before the fourth year of the sixth yeare yet the payment of the 20 s. shall not cease during the six years which is a certaine terme and is a duty to the party himselfe towards the finding of A. B. Dier 141. Pl. 44. King Ed. 6. granteth to the Lady Mary his Sister the Mannor of D. for terme of her life according to the Tenor and effect of the last Will of H. 8. which was that shee should have it so long as she was unmarried afterwards she granted a rent charge out of that Mannor after which grant K. E. dieth by whose death the reversion came to her being Queene and afterwards shee married Philip King c. and it was doubted whether the rent charge should remaine or no. Davis 3. a. b. In ancient times a great part of tenements were holden of their Lords by Socage which was that the Tenants ought to come with their sokes by certaine daies by the yeare to plow and sow the demesne of the Lords and because such workes were made for the livelyhood and sustenance of their Lords they were quitted of all other services and after such services were changed into monies by consent of the Lords though the Lords did alien their demesnes and had no lands to plow or sow yet payed they their rents yearely to the Lords so the Church and religious houses after the procuration of Victualls was reduced to a certaine sum did pay it to the Ordinary yearely though he made no visitation so as the rule The cause ceasing the effect also ceased held not in those cases So Coke l. 4. in Capels case it was resolved that where a man held certaine land by rent for Castle-guard though the Castle was ruined or decayed yet the rent remained and pro doth not import a condition as in the case of an annuity granted pro consilio impendendo but a full and perpetuall recompence and satisfaction Vide Davis plura ibidem In jure non remota sed proxima causa spectatur Bacon Max. f. 1. 2. In the Law the next and not the remote cause is respected For it were infinite for the law to judge of the cause of causes and therefore judgeth of acts by the immediate and next cause as Bar. Empsons case f. 2. An annuity is granted pro consitio seu impendendo and the grantee committeth treason whereby hee is imprisoned that the grantor cannot come unto him for counsell yet the annuity is not determined by this non fesans for the law looketh not on the remote cause to wit the grantors offence which was the cause of the imprisonment but excuseth it because his not giving of counsell was compulsory and not voluntary in regard of the imprisonment which was the immediate cause So if a parson maketh a Lease and be deprived or resigneth the successors shall avoid the Lease for the law regardeth not the cause of the deprivation or the resignation which is the act of the party but the act of the Ordinary in the admission of the new incumbent 2. H. 4. 3. 26. H. 8. 2. A foeffment in fee upon condition that the Feoffee shall enfeoff over and if the feoffee bee disseised and a dissent case and then the feoffee bindeth himselfe in a statute which statute is discharged before the recovery of the Land this is no breach of the condition because the land was never lyable to the statute and the possibility which was the remote cause that it should bee lyable upon the recovery the law doth not respect Coke l. 2. Winningtons case This rule faileth in covenous act where the law taketh heed to the corrupt beginning and also in criminall acts where the law principally regardeth the first motive vide ibidem plura Nihil magis consentaneum est us iisdem modis res dissolvatur quibus constituitur Reg. I.C. and Bracton Nihil tam conveniens est naturali aequitati unumquodque dissalvi eo ligamine quo ligatum est Cok. l. 2. f. 53. a. There is nothing more agreeing to naturall equity then that every thing should be dissolved by the same meanes it was bound As no estate can be vested in the King without matter of record so no estate can be devested out of him without matter of record Ployd f. 553. Walsinghams case and 180. Nevils case 12. H. 7. and many other bookes for nothing is so convenient to naturall equity then that every thing should be dissolved by the same band it was tied and Coke l. 4. f. 57. b. In case of attainder and office the King is entitled by double matter of record and therefore the party grieved ought to avoid it by double matter of record and not by single travers or Monstrans de droit but is driven to his petition vide ibidem plura But when a man avoideth the Kings title by as high a matter of record as the King claimeth though the King be entitled by double matter of Record he may have it by way of Plea as one is attainted of treason by Parliament an office findeth his lands by which the King seiseth them the party may alledge restitution by Parliament and a repeale of the former Act 4. H. 7. 7. b. Finch Nomot 12. Coke l. 5. f. 26. a. Indentures being made for declaring of the uses of a subsequent fine recovery or other assurance to certaine persons and within a certaine time and to certaine uses are but
part which agreeth not with the whole Ployd f. 161. a. And therefore every part of a deed ought to be conferred with the other and one entire sense thereupon to be made as if I release all actions and stay there all actions are gone but if I say further which I have as Executor to I. S. there the generality is restrained So 17. E. 4. f. 22. The King granteth to Garter King of Heralds ten pounds for the terme of his life if he had stayed there he had had it absolutely for terme of his life but where he faith further by reason of his Office by it hee hath restrained the generality vide ibidem plura in Throgmortons case so as if he be removed from his Office he shall lose his annuity Parte quacumque sublata integrante sive necessaria tollitur totum the substantiall or necessary part of any thing being taken away the whole is destroyed Coke l. 3. f 41. in Ratcliffs case As none can be procreated but of the father and the mother and ought to have in him their two bloods which bloods commixed in him by lawfull marriage constitutes and makes him heire so none can be heire to any unlesse he hath in him both the bloods to whom he shall be made heire and therefore the heire of the halfe blood shall not inherit because hee wanteth one of the bloods which make him inheritable for the blood of the father and mother are but one blood inheritable and both are necessary to the procreation of an heire and therefore if there be Baron and Feme Donees in speciall taile and the Baron is attainted of treason and executed having issue and the Feme die the issue shall not have the Land because the father is attainted for he ought in his lineall conveyance to make himselfe heire as well of the part of his father as of the part of his mother Dier f. 332. b. And that bar and forfeiture is made by the Statute of 26. H. 8. c. 13. which provideth that every offender convict of high treason shal forfeit to the King c. All his Lands c. saving to every person all his right title interest c. so as the issues in taile are barred by that statute because the heire is disabled and cannot make himselfe heire in his lineall convâ—yance as well to the father as mother Coke l. 9 f. 140. a. upon which reason Britton saith that if one be attainted of felony by judgement the heires engendred after the attainder shall bee excluded of all manner of succession of inheritance as well of the part of the father as of the part of the mother because at the time of the generation of him the fathers blood was corrupted et ex leproso parente leprosus generatur filius Coke l. 3. f. 41. vide plura From the circumstances of time and place MOmentum instans est unum indivisibile in tempore quod non est tempus neque pars temporis ad quod tamen partes temporis copulantur Ployd 110. b. The distinction of a moment cannot be discerned or observed in the actions of men who cannot doe any thing without the space of time yet as Ployd f. 258. b. in Madam Hales case in things of instant there is a priority of time in the consideration of the Law as in a felon of himselfe the forfeiture shall have no relation but to the time of his death and the death precedeth the forfeiture and notwithstanding the forfeiture commeth at the same instant when he dieth yet in consideration of Law one shall bee said to precede the other though both shall be said to come at an instant for every instant hath the end of one time and the commencement of another and so in the death of a Felon of himselfe the death and the forfeiture commeth together and at the same time and yet there is priority to wit the end of his life is the beginning of the forfeiture and yet the forfeiture is so neere the death that there is no meane time betweene them but are conjoyned for a moment or instant is one indivisible thing in time which is not time nor part of time to which notwithstanding the parts of time are conjoyned vide ibidem plura and in the case between Fulmasten and Steward fo 110. So Fulbeck in his Pandects L. 1. f. 9. b. The existence of a moment cannot possibly be discerned and therefore is not so much as the twinckling of an eye yet the Law doth operate without compass of time in an instant but man never for every act of man must have space longer or shorter but the nature of such instants as the law doth imagine is such and so suddaine that as the Civilians omnom respuunt moâ—am and the reason is because in the operation of the law that which is imagined to be done is dicto citius presently done and whereas the act of man is mixed with the act of Law though in regard of the same thing the act of Law is momentary yet the act of man must needs beare some delay as those things by the civill law which are taken from the enemies doe incontinently become his who doth seise and take them the law doth give them unto him presently yet there must be a time to take them that the Law may give them So if a Lease be made to A. for the life of B. and A. dyeth C. entreth into the Land and enjoyeth it as occupant the Law because it will not have the freehold in suspence doth imagine that it was presently and immediately in him after the death of A. and that he entred presently but if we respect the entry as the Act of man we must needs conceive that he had some time to enter into the Land and by his entry which is an act of motion to gaine the free hold ibidem Quae incontinenti fiunt in esse videntur Coke l. 8. f. 77. a. Those things which are done in an instant seeme to be in esse or in being in Staffords case as a particular estate and the increase of a particular estate ought to take effect by the same deed or grant or â—y two deeds delivery at the same time which is all one in effect for those things which are done in an instant and at the same time seeme to be in being And the particular estate and the increase of the estate upon it is but one grant to take effect out of the same root and though that it vesteth at severall times yet when it vesteth it hath the vigor and force of the same grant 27. H. 6. f. 7. So l. 2. f. 71. a. A condition cannot precede an estate but ought to be in the said conveyance or comprised in another deed delivered at one and the same time as the books are agreed in 17. Ass 2. and 34. Assise for the above said reason vide ibidem S. Cromwels case But Coke com f. 236. putteth
a difference between inheritances executed and inheritances executory as if Lands be executed by livery they cannot by Indenture of defeasance be defeated afterward or if the disseisee release to a disseisor it cannot be defeated by Indentute of defeasance afterwards but at the time of the release or feoffment the same may bee defeated by Indentures of defeasance for it is a Maxime in law quae inconunenti fiunt in esse videntur But Rents Annuities Conditions Warranties such like that be inheritances executory may be defeated by defeasances made either at that time or at any time after so is the law of statutes recognisances and obligations and other things executory ib. Agreeable to this rule is the reason of the case put by Bro. judgement 148. That if a Feme suffer a recovery of her joynture against the statute of 11 H. 7. without the assent of him in the reversion and after hee in the reversion releaseth to the recoveror by Fine that assent commeth too late and cannot make the recovery good was once void and for the same reason the consent of the major part of a Chapter must bee done at one time simul semel and not scatteringly or at severall daies vide Davis Rep. f. 48. b. So Pl. f. 135. a. b. A Lease by deed for 11. yeares and in security of the terme the Lessor made a Charter upon condition that if he was disturbed of his terme he should have fee and livery and seisin was made as well upon the one Charter as the other then the Lessee was disturbed and it was adjudged that he should have fee because the Charters were delivered at one and the same time T. 10. E. 3. f. 521. Tempus est mensura motus secundum prius posterius Aâ—ist 4. Phys Time is the measure of motion according to priority and posteriority for as the motion doth measure the place so doth time the motion as a days journey is measured of a day and an houres of an houre and because all contracts and matters of entercourse doe fall within the lists and precincts of time therefore the moments and measures of time should be publikely and familiarly knowne to popular conceits For tempus est mensura rerum time is the measure of all things and as Ployd f. 555. b. the diversity of estates proceeds from the diversity of time for the estate in Land is the time in Land for he that hath a fee-simple in Land hath time in the Land without fine or the Land for time without end so he that hath land in taile hath time in it or the land for time so long as hee hath issue of his body and he which hath an estate in Land for life hath time no longer then that he shall live and so for another mans life or yeares And as the time measureth things so doth the law measure time as by the true computation the lesser yeare consisteth of 865. daies and six houres whereby in every fourth yeare there is die excrescens which maketh that yeare to have 366. daies which is called the greater yeare yet by legall computation a quarter of a year containeth 91. daies half a year containeth 162. daies for the od houres in legal computation are rejected And in the statute de annob Sextil it is provided Quod computetur dies ille excrescens dies proxime praecedens pro uno die that the day excrescent and the day precedent shall be computed for one day so as in computation the day excrescent is not accounted so a month is regularly accounted in law for twenty eight daies and not according to the Solar month nor according to the Kalender unlesse it be for the account of the Lapse in a Quare impedit or the right of the Patron Coke com f. 135. b. And Kellaway 21. H. 7. f. 75. A feast in our law beginneth in the morning and endeth at the night and the naturall day beginneth ad ortum solis and endeth ad occasum solis and so is it taken and adjudged in our Law But the feast by the law of the Church beginneth at noone in the Vigil and lasteth untill the midnight of the next day and the night which maketh burglary beginneth ad occasum solis and lasteth untill the rising of the Sunne for where a man hath broken an house after the setting of the Sun it hath beene adjudged burglary for if the night should begin so soone as the day is ended and last untill the morning of the next day it would be too hard a thing to try c. ibidem In omnibus stipulationibus id tempus spectatur a quo contrabimus Reg. I.C. Paulus 62. ad edictum in all assumpsits and contracts that time is respected from which we contract as a man seised in fee maketh a lease for ten yeares and after selleth the land and taketh it back againe to him and his wife and then the husband and wife letteth it for twenty years reserving a rent the husband dieth the wife accepteth the rent for the first ten yeares by this the second lease is not affirmed for the acceptance of the rent before the lease beginneth and is not due is no acceptance 1. E. 6. 37. Coke l. 5. f. 1. a. b. in Claytons case From henceforth in a Lease shall be accounted from the delivery of the Indentures and not from the computation of the date for from henceforth is all one to say as from the making of the Lease Et traditio loqui facit chartam delivery maketh the deed to speake where a Lease is to begin from the making of a Lease there the day of the delivery shall be taken inclusive and the day it selfe is parcell of the demise but if it be made to begin from the day of the making or the day of the date then the day it selfe shall be taken exclusive and excluded And whereas the statute of 27. H. 8. Of enrolement saith That all such writings shall be enrolled within six monthes after the date of the same writings indented if the writings have date they shall bee accounted from the date but if the date be wanting the six months shall be accounted from the delivery vide ibidem plura In obligationibus in quibus dies non ponitur presenti die debetur Pomponius nulla temporis designatio praesens denotat Reg. I. C. And it is a ground in our Law that when a man 's bound in twenty pound to pay ten pound and no day of payment is limitted the lesser sum is due presently and ought presently to bee tendred 20. E. 4. 8. 21. E. 4. 8. In the case of the Mayor of Exeter by all the Serjeants and of some of the Justices yet by the opinion of Starky the discretion of the Justice shall limit a time having regard to the distance of the place and to the space of time wherein such a thing may be performed for the Obligor is not
Plaintiff had a free Chase but he must prove it 10. E. 3. 20. Affirmativum negativum implicat Ployd f. 206. b. An affirmative includeth a negative for every statute limiting any thing to be in one forme although it be spoken in the affirmative yet it includeth in it selfe a negative as the statute of W. 2. c. 4. Of a quod ei deforceat giveth that the demandant shall vouch ac si tenens esset in priori bâ—eve includeth a negative to wit and not otherwise for it hath been taken since it that if the first writ was a Sciâ—e facias and the tenant in the Quod ei de forceat mainteineth the title of it the demandant shall not vouch for he shall vouch ac si tenens esset in priori breve which is as much as to say that he shall vouch ac si tenens esset in priore breve and in no other manner and then in the first writ it being a Scire facias he cannot vouch no more then now So the statute of W. 2. c. 11. Provideth that upon an account ended before auditors assigned and arrearages found upon the accountants they have power to send and deliver their bodies to the next Goale of the Lord the King in those parts and upon it is taken 27. H. 6. f. 8. That the auditor ought to commit him to the next Goale though it be in another County for they cannot vary from the place limited by the statute and is as much as if be had said and in no other Goale So the statute of W. 2. c. 3. giveth a Writ of second deliverance out of the Court where the first replevin was granted and a man cannot have it any where else for where the statute appointeth the place order and forme of suits then they cannot sue in any other place or any other forme if they should it shall be contrary to the purview of the statute So if tenant in taile make a feoffment to himself for life and after to the use of his issue in taile and dieth since the statute of 27. H. 8. The issue in taile shall not be remitted for the statute executed the possession in the same manner and forme as he had the use which is all one as if he should say and in no other manner and form and he had the use as a Purchaser and so he shall have the land here and not be remitted 2. M. 1. ante 114. vide ibidem plura From Division DIvisio est oratio qua totum in partes distinguiâ—ur a division is an oration by which the whole is divided into parts Argumentum a divisione est fortissimum Coke l. 6. f. 60. a. An Argument drawne from division is most strong as there are four sorts of commons common appendant common appurtenant in grosse and by reason of Vicinage but common residentiae commorationis of residence and dwelling is none of them therefore no common Res per divisionem melius aperiuntur Eract And the Civilians per divisionem melius materia intelligit by division things are more cleerely opened and by it the matter is the better undestood and therefore saith Plato speaking in the person of Socrates Si nactus fuisset autem qui bene partiri sciat se iâ—sias tanquam Dei vestigia consâ—cuturum esse if he had obtained a leader who knew well to divide he had followed him as the footsteps of God for by division the Clouds of confusion are cleered and the distinct and true nature of the thing manifested and as Lodovicus all falsehood proceedeth from conformation when through rudenesse we know not how to discerne confused things so as we are deceived with the like or things neare unto them Quae in partes dividi nequeunt solida a singulis praestant Coke l 6. f. 1. Those things which cannot be devided into parts ought wholly to be performed of every one As Lord and Tenant of three Acres of Lands by homage fealty and annuall service of a Spurrier and suit of Court if the Lord maketh a Feoffment in fee or one Acre the feoffee shall hold by homage fealty a spurrier and suit of Court by the common Law for those things which cannot bee devided shall entirely be perâ—ormed by every single person vide ibidem plura of which neverthelesse some certain ones are appointed by the statute to avoid trouble to bee performed by the eldest coheire for â—hâ— rest as homage Dod. 104. En. L. If an Ox be devised to one and the Ox dyeth without any default of the Executor whether is the Skin oâ— Hide of the Ox due to the Executor or the Devisee by the common Law the Devisee shall have the hide for it is parcell of the Ox and the Ox was an entire thing and cannot be divided but by the civill law the executor shall have it because the Ox did perish and was no Ox before the Skin was taken off but the skin was taken off from the Carcasse Fulb. 1. f. 45. b. Frustra sit per plura quod fieri potest per pauciâ—ro 9. H. 7. 24. Coke l. 8. f. 167. a. Division is a resolution of the whole into parts and ought to consist of as few parts as may be for it is vaine to doe that by more may be effected by fewer and therefore the Peripatericks approve a dicotomy or a two fold division non 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not that we should be restrained to make a division alwaies of two parts but that we may divide it into as many as the nature of the thing râ—quireth As Littleton divided rents into rent charge rent-service and rent-seck and very well because it was according to the severall nature of rents and so also did he divide warranties into lineal collaterall and comminenting by disseâ—sin so are actions devided into reall personall and mixt and also the division of fewer parts or more is to be admitted if the nature of the thing so devided doth requiâ—e it therfore were the Ramists so curious in their strict observing of a Dicotomy Coke l. 6. 167. a. If the King by his Patent reciting the estate taile doth grant the reversion and further granteth the lands in possession those severall grants in one Patent are as good and strong in law as if the King by one patent had recited the estate taile and granted the reversion and by another Patent had granted the Lands inpossession for vainly that is done by more which may be done by fewer Ploâ—d f. 191. b. If I release all the right I have in all my Lands in Dale which I have by descent of part of my father and I have no Lands dy descent of part of my father the release is void for he must aver that I had such Lands in Dale by descent of the part of my father But if the release had beene in white Acre of D. which I had by descent of part of my father and I haee no lands by descent of
disseisin the law is removed from land to land beyond these degrees which writ is given by the statute of Marlebridge c. 18. though before at the common law in respect of such long possession the demandant was driven to his writ of right vide ibidem plura Vis unita fortior Ployd f. 307. a. united force is more strong as in Sharingtons case There are three causes premised to make and raise uses in lands the first is his affection for the provision of his males the second is his affection that the lands he had should remaine in his blood the third is his Brotherly love he bore to his brother whereas every one of them had beene sufficient to raise uses yet when all are put together they are of the greater force for forces united are more strong Conjunctio maris feminae est de jure naturae Coke l. 7. f. 13. Arist 1. Polit. Nuptias non concubitus sed consensus facit Vlpian consensus non concubitus facit matrimonium Coke com f. 33. a. In matrimony there is a conjunction both of the bodies and the mindes and in contracting matrimony the consent of the mind obtaineth the chiefe and substantiall parts and corporall copulation the second and therefore is it said that the consent and not the copulation maketh the marriage for every denomination is from the greater and a woman by the common law cannot consent before she is of the age of twelve yeares nor a Man untill the age of fourteen yeares and these are called annos nubiles because at that age either of them may disagree from a former marriage Coke ibidem for a marriage infra annos nubiles underneath the marriageable yeares is inchoate and imperfect to all purposes except her dower and accordingly was it resolved in Ambrosa Gorges case Coke l. 6. f. 40. a. Who being married and her husband dying before she was of the age of ten yeares was notwithstanding the former marriage adjudged to be in ward to the Queen because the former marriage was no marriage before consent and they could not consent ante annos nubiles for the consent and not the copulation maketh the marriage And therefore is matrimony defined by Britton to be assemblee del home feme alieur deux volunts a conjunction of a man and woman according to both their wils f. 246. And which as Bracton saith l. 1. c. 5. fit per mutuam voluntatem for their mutuall consent is the efficient and necessary cause of marriage and therefore a marriage enforced contrary to the will of either party is unnaturall and illegall as Kelway 19. H. 7. 52. b. Where the case is that Margaret the now wife of Keble brought an action of trespasse against Vernon to which the defendant said that he heretofore at the Church of S. in the said county tooke the Plaintiff to wife and there were married according to the lawes of the Church and demanded judgement if action to which the Plaintiff said that those espousalls were made by menaces and duresse of imprisonment and against the will of the said Plaintiff in another county and prayed her damages and after great debate whether the espousalls were avoidable by duresse or no Frowick said that he had seen the bookes and that it seemed cleerely that the espousals were well avoided by duresse and the replication vide ibidem plura And which also seemeth to be the resolve and determination of all nations for for it Romulus himselfe was upbraided to wit for forcing the Sabine Virgins against their wils to marry the Romans and was declared by his successors the Roman Authors to be a barbarous act and a crime equivalent to a rape as Propertius l. 2. El. 6. Tu criminis author Nutritus duro Romule lacte lupae Tu rapere intactas docuisti impune Sabinas Thou hardy Romulus nurs'd by brutish care And Wolvish milk was so fierce to dare To snatch the Sabine Virgins from their Sires And force them to the nuptiall of their friendes desires A Savage crime unpunisht And by Virgill more fully Raptas sine more Sabinas That is ravished contrary to the custome of all nations for in that age when Rome most flourished the customes of the Romans were the lawes of all nations as Claudian l. 4. Stil Armorum legumque parens quae fundit in omnes Imperium primique dedit cunabula juris Rome by the power of Armes and lawes doth sway The spacious universe and did wisely lay The Plat-forme and the grounds of law and right And therefore not long after by the Romane civill law the consent of the espoused parties was ratified by an oath which being but a contract was called sponsalia de futuro which also in our law at this day is of great force for by it a precontract is a sufficient cause of divorce a vinculo matrimonii Coke com f. 285. a. Vir uxor sunt quasi unica persona quia caro una sanguis unus Cok com f. 187. b. The husband and wire are but one person in law Littleton because they are one flesh and one blood as the Scripture saith and as the Philosopher are by nature conjoyned As if a joynt estate be made to the husband and wife and to a third person the husband and wife shall have one moiety and the third person the other moiety because the husband and wife are but one person in law so if an estate be made to the husband and wife and to two others the husband and wife shall have but the third part Lit. If an estate be made to a villaine and his wife being free and to their heires they have severall capacities the villaine to purchase for the benefit of the Lord and the wife for her owne yet if the Lord of the Villaine enter and the wife survive she shall have the whole land because there was no moieties between them 40. Ass Pl. 7. If a woman marry with her obligor the debt is extinct and she shall never have action against the Obligor because the suit against her husband by inter marriage was suspended and therefore being a personall action and suspended against one it is discharged against both 21. H. 7. 29. h. So is it If a feme sole baile goods to one and marry with the bailee they are the bailees good so it is if the wife buy goods of one 33. E. 3. If husband and wife purchase lands to them and their heires and the hsband alien the land c. she shall recover the whole in a cui in vita after his death and the warranty of one of them or his Ancestors is a bar of the whole against them both 39. H. 6. 45. 21. R. 2. Judg. 63. And for the same reason the husband cannnot enfeoff the wife but upon a feoffment made unto her by a stranger he may deliver seisin unto her by a letter of attorney for thereby he giveth nothing himselfe Perk. 40. If a
words contrary to the simple intent as Tully saith in his Offices is calumnia quaedam ninis callida malitiosa Juris interpretatio ex quo illud summum jus summa injuria a kind of a calumny and malitious interpretation of the law from whence that saying proceeded the rigor of right is the extremity of injury As he putteth the example of one had made a truce for 130. daies with his enemy and in the night he plundered and depopulated his possessions because he said the truce was for daies and not for the nights which Cicero accounteth meere injury and injustice and admonisheth men to avoid the like interpretation of the law and to observe the intent of the words and certainly words are but testimonialls of the intent and therefore Ployd f. 107. b. It is said it is the offices of Judges to take and expound the words as the common people doe use them to express their intent according to their intent As a Lease was made for life and that after his decease the tenements redibunt to a stranger it shall be taken as a remanebunt because to that purpose it was there used and therefore by 18. E. 3. f. 28. It shall be taken by way of remainder So a lease for life the reversion to a stranger shall be taken as a remainder for the reason abovesaid 30. M. 1. ante 157. vide ibidem plura in Hills case And so Ployd f. 291. a. Where a covenant cannot be performed according to the words it shall be performed according to the intent as neere as may bee as in the case of Littleton where a man maketh a feoffment upon condition that the feoffee shall make an estate in speciall taile to the Feoffor and his wife and the heires of their bodies if the Baron dieth before the estate made the estate shall be made as neere to the condition as may be to wit to the feme for life without impeachment of wast the remainder to the issues in taile according to the first limitation and if the feme be dead then the feoffee ought to give the lands to the issues and the heires of the bodie of his father and his mother engendred If the words be performed and not the intent the agreement is not performed Ployd f. 291. b. according to the rule of the civill law leges non ex verbis sed ex mente sunt intelligendae lawes are not to be understood and construed by the words but by sense and meaning of the parties as where the Defendant was obliged upon condition that if his feoffees of his Mannor of W. should grant to the Plaintiff an annuall rent of forty shillings out of the said Mannor that then c. and he had three feoffees and two of them granted to the Plaintiff the rent There the words of the condition were performed for the feoffees had granted the rent and yet he had not performed the condition for all the Justices there held that all the feoffees ought to have granted the rent and so it should be sure for there the third might have the land by survivor and he might avoid the rent and also more then two parts of the Mannor were not charged with the rent and so the intent is not performed though the words be M. 22. H. 6. f. 10. So if a man be bound to enfeoff me of the Mannor of D. and he maketh a feoffment ro another of parcell of it and then enfeoffeth me of the Mannor he hath performed the words but yet he hath not performed the intent which was that I should have had all the Mannor as it then was H. 3. H. 7. 4. So a remainder was limited to B. Si ipse vellet in-habitare residens esse if he would dwell and bee resident on the land during the terme there it is taken that if he was resident one week during the terme he had performed the words of the condition but not the intent for the intent was that hee should be resident all the terme 4. E. 6. ante 23. So an Abbot was Parson Emparsonee of a time c. and he had annuity for the time of which no memory runneth in right of the Parsonage and he as Abbot without naming himselfe Parson brought a Writ of annuity and counteth upon a prescription in him and his predecessors Abbots and the prescription traversed and found for the Plaintiff there every word of the Verdict is true and yet attaint lay against the Jury because he brought the Writ in the name of the Abbey and so claimed the annuity whereas he was not seised by that forme but as Parson and for that he did not claime as Parson they ought not to have found the issue with him and so the words of the Verdict and the intent of the Verdict did not agree in one M. 10. E. 4. f. 16. Ibidem in Chapmans case It is not requisite alwaies that the agreement shall be performed according to words because the intent is performed which is the principall point of the agreement Ployd f. 295. a. b As if a man be bound to pay a lesser summe upon a day certaine if I pay the summe before the day the condition is performed H. 10. H. 7. 24. So if the condition be in a Mortgage that I pay the money at such a place if I shall pay it at another place and the Mortgage accept of it it is well enough for the value is the effect So if a feoffment be made upon condition that if the feoffee doe not pay the Feoffor such a summe at such a day that then the feoffor shall enter If the feoffee before the day make a feoffment over and at the day doth not pay the summe there the second feoffee at the day may tender and pay the summe though the agreement was no other but that the first feoffee shall pay the summe Litt. vide ib. plura If a man make a feoffment on condition to enfeoff two in fee at such a time and before the time one dieth the feoffment ought to be made to the survivor and his heires onely for the intent which appeareth in the condition Ployd f. 345. 4. H. 7. f. 127. Every one who groundeth an Act with discretion hath an intention in the inception and neither beginneth any thing but to some end and in the progression hath the same intent and so in the consummation so as the same intention is the cause of every part and therefore the intention is principally respected in all humane acts and especially in those which concerne the disposition of our estates and in feoffments and grants A feoffment by deed of a Mannor with an advowson appendant and no livery made the advowson passeth not yet an advowson may pass without livery but the intention and the meaning was that the Mannor and it should pass together Finch Nomot 58. A bargaine and sale of Land and a reversion by deed not enrolled the reversion passeth
Coke com f. 25. a. A devise cannot direct an inheritance to descend contrary to the rules of the Common Law as if a man devise Lands to one and the heires males of his body and hath issue a Daughter who hath issue a Son the Son shall not inherit as heire male because he must convey the descent from the heires males for though a devise may create an inheritance by other words then a gift can yet can it not direct an inheritance to descend contrary to the rule of Law and no intent of the devisor appeareth that the Son of the Daughter should against the rule of the Law inherit vide Ployd f. 414. b. So if a gift be made to a man and the heirs females of his hody and hath issue a Son who hath issue a Daughter this Daughter shall never inherit vide ibidem plura Prâ—ximus sum egomet mihi Ployd f. 545 a. It is the naturall order to karve himselfe before he karve another and charity beginneth at home And therefore in legacies it is reason that the Executors shall have preferment of satisfaction before others and the Law maketh allowance to them before any others because as Lit. faith they represent the person of the Testator and Coke com f. 209. b. The Executors doe more represent the person of the Testator then the heire doth to the Ancestor for though the Executor be not named in Mortgage yet the Law appointeth him to receive the mony but so doth not the Law appoint the heire to receive the mony unlesse he be named and therefore if the Obligee maketh the Obligor his Executor it is a release in Law and if the Obligor make the Obligee his Executor the Action is gone for they are as it were the same person in law whence the law maketh allowance to them before any other For if a man devise to A. 20 l. and to B. 20 l. and to C. 20 l. and maketh his executor and dieth having goods only to the value of 20 l. now it is in the election of the executor to which of those three he will pay the 20 l. and if he pay it to one the other cannot contradict it neither hath he any remedy for his legacy so by the same reason if one of the three be made executor to the testator the law saith he may and will retaine the 20 l. in satisfaction of his legacy and the law alloweth of it for it is reason that he be next to himselfe and have regard to himselfe before another And this is the reason of the case in 12. H. 4. f. 21. where in debt upon an obligation against the heir he pleaded that the Plaintiff was executor to Lancestor which deed he put before them and administred certaine goods and Chattels to the value of the debt and more and retained the same summe with him in the name of payment and demanded judgement if Action And Hull said that if he did not retaine the same to himselfe and might have retained it and did not he shall be barred for a man is bound to be next to himself and this was the opinion of some of them for which he pleaded there that he adminstred no goods after the death of the Testator vide ibidem plura in Paramers case And for the same reason doth the law in all reciprocall acts respect mutuall recompence and consideration for if there be no consideration why should they be made Doct. and St. and it is supposed there was error in such Acts because there is no consideration of profit for every one is next unto himselfe ad suum lucrum satis sapit is sufficiently wise to project his owne emolument And therefore have considerations a great effect in lawes and customes for consideration is the beginning of all customes the grounds of all uses the reason of all rights and the causes of all duties For without consideration nothing is wrought by any conveyance no interest transferred no right removed nor duty accrued and no custome hath continuance As if the Lord of the Manner prescribe that every one who passeth the highway which lyeth in his Mannor shall pay 12. d. to him for his passage this is void and not upon good consideration but if he prescribe to have a penny of every one that passeth such a Bridge which the Lord of the Mannor doth use to repaire this is a good prescription Calthrope Copy-holds f. 35. and 36. And therefore is consideration described by Dier f 336. to be the cause or occasion of a meritorious recompence either in deed or law for all contracts and bargaines have quid pro quo contractus est quasi actus contra actum and must have quid pro quo Coke com f. 47. b. And so it is in exchanges annuities pro consilio impendendo or service rents services and tenures for dâ—meanes of Lands as Frank-almoigne Homage-auncestrell for warranty and acquittall commons for cause of vicinage or service Devise of a woman causa matrimonij praelocuti so the manner of a gift to doe such a thing or to make such a thing Considerations are either executory or executed and in considerations executory the recompence failing the Feoffment or grant ceaseth as a feoffment to instruct the feoffor in one mistery or Art if the Feoffor dieth before instruction the heir shall re-enter 21. E. 3. Grant of an Office and for the executing it a fee if the office be determined the fee is determined M. 5. E. 4. 7. and 20. E. 4. If a woman give land causa matrimonii prelocuti and he will not marry her she shall have a writ to recover the land Ployd f. 58. a. If a man make a lease for yeares rendring rent the lessee needeth not pay any rent if the Lessor had nothing in the land at the time of the lease because he had not quid pro quo Coke com f. 47. b. If I grant an annuity pro consilio impendendo if he wil not give me councell I must stay my annuity Ployd 144. b. An usuall and accustomed attendance of a corodian upon the Soveraigne of a monastery upon festivall daies determineth the corodie it being a reward for attendance Exchanges not executed by each party at the first is defeasible 9. H. 4. A portion of rithes granted by indenture for ever without cavillation or contradiction and an annuity granted for the aforesaid portion So to have a way for my life and I grant an annuity of 20 s. without limitation the annuity shall endure but during my life Dier 336. 337. Where no consideration is expressed there the consideration may be averred Dier 146. Vellies case A rehersall of a consideration past whether it be true or false shall not dissolve the gift as because he served me in the Wars beyond the Seas although it be false it is not materiall Bracton in modis donationum and so in the case of the King Dier f. 337. If A. enfeoff B.
the Deed or writing it shall not bind the party that delivered it for it is at the perill of the party to whom the writing is made that the true purport effect of the writing be declared if the party that shall deliver the writing doth require it but if the party who shall deliver the writing doth not require it he shall be bound by the Deed though it shall be contrary to his meaning and it mattereth not though a meere stranger readeth the writing which is well proved by the usuall forme of pleading in such case to wit that he was a Lay-man and not lettered and that the Deed was read to him in other words c. generally without shewing by whom it was read Coke l. 2. Thorowgoods case f. 11. b. If a disseisor dye seised the Disseissee being within age Covert Baron in Prison or out of the Realme it shall be no descent to take away the entry Finch Nomot f. 26. In omnibus fere minori atati succurritur Coke l. 9. 84. In all cases for the most part there is favour shewed to them within age As In a writ of customes and services which is in the nature of a writ of right in which finall judgement shall be given against an infant who is in by descent in 6. H. 3. Tit. page 144. It is adjudged he shall have his age so in a Cessavit against an infant who hath the tenancy by descent he shall have his age though it be upon his own cesser because he cannot know what arrearages he shall tender before judgement and that also is in the nature of a writ of right for if he make not true tender he shall lose his Land 28. E. 3. 99. But in a per quae servitia against an infant who hath the tenancy by descent he shall not have his age because he hath benefit and availe over and above the Premisses and therefore is he called tenant paravaile and it is against reason that when the heire hath profit by the tenancy that he shall not pay annuall rent and it is no mischeife unto him for notwithstanding his Attornement within age he may at his full age disclaime to hold of him or to acknowledge that he holdeth of him by lesser or other services Coke ibidem And regularly it is true that an infant may doe any thing for his own advantage and not to his prejudice as to be an Executor or to purchase without the consent of any other for it is intended his benefit and at his full age he may either agree thereunto or perfect it or without any cause alledged waive or disagree to the purchase and so may his heire if he doth not agree at his full age Coke com f. 2. b. In a writ of mesne the proceedings shall not be stayed for the nonage of the infant because it is not reason that the infant shall be distrained for the services of the mesne during his nonage and shall not have remedy untill he is at full age Coke l. 9. f. 85. a. If an infant make a Feoffment in person if he dye without heire the Land shall not escheate but otherwise it is if it be by letter of Attorny Dyer f. 10. Coke l. 4. f. 125. a. An infant shall sue by procheine amy but defend by guardian Coke com f. 135. a. If an infant buyeth Lands in fee with the mony for which he did sell his own Land yet may he avoid his own alienation Doct. Stud 21. An Execution Elegit and Statute Merchant c. shall not be sued against the heire during his infancy Coke com 290. a. An infant shall avoid matters in faite either within age or of full age but matters of Record as Statutes c. acknowledged by him a fine levied by him or recovery against him by default in a reall action must be avoided by him during his minority to wit Statute by Audita querela and the fine and recovery by a writ of error because they are judiciall acts and taken by a Court or a Judge and therefore the nonage of the party to avoid the same shall be tryed by inspection of Judges and not by the Country and because his nonage must be tryed by inspection this cannot be done at his full age but if that age be inspected by the Judges and recorded that he is within age albeit he come of full age before the reversall yet may it be reversed after his full age Coke com f. 380. b. The Law doth provide for the safety of a mans or womans estate that before the age of twenty one years they cannot alien any Lands Goods or Chattells or bind themselves by deed Coke com f. 171. b. Unlesse it be for necessary meate drink and apparrell necessary physick and such other necessaries and likewise for his good teaching and instruction whereby he may profit himselfe afterwards but it must be pro necâ—ssario vestitu for convenient apparrell and not for Gold lace 11. H 7. and ought to be suitable to his calling Popham Rep. f. 152. But if he bind himselfe in an obligation or other writing with a penalty for the payment of any of these the obligation shall not bind him also all other things of necessity shall bind him as presentation to a benefice for otherwise the lapse should incurr against him Also if an infant be Executor upon payment of any debt due to the Testator he may make an acquittance and in that case a release without payment is void ibidem f. 172. a. If a man inheritor taketh wife who have issue a Son between them and the Father dyeth and the son entreth into the land and endoweth the mother and then the mother alieneth that which she hath in dower to another in fee with warranty and then dyeth and the warranty descendeth to the Son this warranty collaterall shal bar the Son Little but if the Heir be within age at the time of the descent of the warranty he may enter and avoid the estate either within age or at any time after his full age but if he within age at the time of the alienation with warranty and become of full age before the descent of the warranty the warranty shall barr him for ever Coke com f. 380. b. Though no laches shall be adjudged in an infant in case of descent as Littleton saith yet in some other cases laches shall prejudice an infant as laches shall be adjudged in an infant if he present not to a Church within six months for the Law respecteth more the priviledge of the Church that the cure be served then the priviledge of he infant so the publicK repose of the Realme shall be preferred before the priviledge of infancy in the case of a fine where the fine beginneth in the time of the Ancestor As if a fine be levied before the act of non-claime and one of full age had right at the time of the time levied and dyeth within the
by discontinuance disseisin abatement c. and of this right is the saying to be understood that the right descendeth and not the Land which may be released to him in possession and this right is also called jus proprietatis as if a man be disseised of an Acre of Land the disseisee hath jus proprietatis and the Disseisor hath jus possessionis and if the Disseisee release to the Disseisor he hath jus proprietatis possessionis Coke com 266. a. but the reservation of a Rent upon such a release is voyd as if the disseisee release to the disseisor of Land reserving a rent the reservation is voyd Coke com 144. b. Neither can a bare right a right of entry or a thing in action be granted or transferred to a stranger by the ancient maxime of the Common Law Coke com f. 166. for that thereby is avoyded great oppression injury and injustice but if a bare right happen to be forfeited to the King he may grant the same by his Prerogative Frustra est potentia quae nunquam venit in actum Vaine is the possibility which never commeth into act Coke l. 2. f. 501. There is jus proprietatis possessionis possibilitatis and the right of possibility which dependeth upon the death of a man hath a necessary and common intendment to wit necessary in regard that all the issues of Adam must dye for statutum est omnibus hominibus semel mori and common because the death may happen at such a time that the contingency may take effect and this necessary and common possibility is called potentia propinqua which may come into act and is not therefore vaine or voyd in Law as in 15 H. 7. 10. If Lands be given to a marryed man and a marryed woman and to the heires of their two bodies ingendred this is a good estate in tail for it is of necessity that death shall ensue and in common possibility that one shall dye before the other so as the marryage may ensue but in the same case there shall not be possibility upon possibility and therefore if land be given to one man and two women there the Law shall not intend that first he shall marry one and then that shee that he shall marry shall dye and that he shall espouse the other and therefore in this case they have severall inheritances at the beginning as if Land be given to two barons and their femes and the heires of their bodies engendred in this case the Law shall not expect second marriages and therefore in this case they shall have joynt estates for life and one baron and feme one moyety in tail in common with the other baron and feme of the other moyety and so severall inheritances and with it accordeth 24. E. 3. 29. for otherwise there should be possibility upon possibility and if a man give Land to baron and feme there is an apparent possibility that they shall have issue but if after they be divorced causa praecontractus so as the possibility is dissolved the Law shall never expect the second marriage for by the divorce they have but an estate of Frank-tenement 4. H. 7. 16. 17. And a woman may enfeoff a married man causa matrimonij prae locuti for it is of necessity that death shall ensue and in common possibility that the Feme of the Feoffee shall dye before the Feoffee So in the common case of a lease for life the remainder to the right heires of I. S. the remainder is good for the necessary and common intendement vide ibidem plura in Lampets case Coke l. 10. f. 50. b. For the Law respecteth the right of possibility and will have nothing to be void that by possibility may be good As a mesnalty is given in tail reserving a rent this is good for the tenancy may escheate to the donee and then the doner shall distraine for all the arrearages 1. H. 4. 2. A man hath issue a daughter and leaveth his wife privement enseint the wife may detaine the Charters of her husbands Lands from the Daughter for the possibility it may be a Son shee goeth withall 41. E. 3. 21. b. But if A. be indebted to B. in two hundred pounds and delivereth goods to him to sell to pay his debt in the best manner he can and he is proferred two hundred pounds for them and refuseth and after selleth them for an hundred pounds A. shall answer the residue of the debt notwithstanding this possibility 18. E. 4. 5. But the possibility must be propinque and a common possibility as death or dying without issue or coverture or the like but if it be a remote possibility the Law doth judge it vaine because it shall not be intended by common intendement to happen as a remainder to a corporation which is not at the time of the limitation and remainder is void though such a corporation was after erected during the particular estate for that was potentia remota 9. H. 6. 24. For as Ployd f. 345. a. b. It is a principle in Law that all gifts be it by devise or otherwise they ought to have a donee in esse and not in posse who hath capacity to take them given when it ought to vest as devise of Lands in fee and so of goods if the devise dye before the devisor neither his Heire or Executor shall gaine any thing by this Will vide ibidem plura in Brets case So if a lease be made for life the remainder to the right heires of I. S. if at the limitation of the remainder there be not any such I. S. but during the life of tenant for life I. S. is borne and dyeth his heire shall never take as it is agreed in 2. H. 7. 13. And so in 11. E. 3. 46. the case was that upon a fine levied to R. he granted and rendred the tenements to one I. and F. his wife for their lives the remainder to G. the Son of I. in tail the remainder to the right heires of I. and at the time levied I. had not any son named G. but after he had issue named G. and in praecipe against F. it was adjudged that G. should not take the remainder in tail because he was not borne at the time of the fine levied but long after by which another who was right heire of I. S. was received for when I. had not any son named G. at the time of the fine levied the law doth not expect that he shal have a Son named G. after for that is potentia remota a remote possibility But if the remainder had been limited by a generall name as to the right heirs of I. or primogenito filio such a remainder might have been good for the common possibility But if a remainder be contrary to Law the Law shall never adjudge a grant good by reason of a possibility or expectation of a thing which is contrary to Law for that is potentia
it shall be apportioned vide ibidem plura If a man be bound to appeare at a day before Justices at which day the obligor casteth him into Prison so as he cannot come the bond is saved otherwise if he were in Prison for Felony or any other misdemeanor for that is his own act and fault 32. H. 6. Bar 60. Or if he cast himselfe into Prison Nâ—y Max. f. 13. An infants appeale shall not stay for his full age for he shall not take advantage of his own wrong 27. H. 8. 11. One in Execution escapeth and the Goaler taketh him againe the party if he will may have him to remaine in Prison in execution for him still for the escape is his own wrong 13. H. 7. 1. So Coke l. 3. in Britons case If one in Prison upon execution escape if he be taken he shall not bring an Audita querela to discharge himselfe of his imprisonment for he shall not take advantage of his own wrong He that is party to a wrong shall not take advantage by the same wrong Perk. 41. b. As if Lessor and Lessee for yeares joyne in the cutting downe of twenty Oakes the Lessor shall not punish him in a Writ of Wast and take advantage of his own wrong The heire which is party to the death of his Father shall not have an appeale of it And if issue in taile disseise the Discontinuee of his Father and then enfeoff his Father and his Father then dyeth seised and the issue in tail enter he shall not be remitted If Lessee for life of one Acre of Land leaseth the same Acre to his Lessor for yeares the remainder to a stranger in fee and maketh livery and seisin to the Lessor accordingly it is no forfeiture Perkins ib. If tenant for terme of life enfeoff the feme of the Lessor of the same Land leased and maketh a Letter of Attorny to the Lessor to make livery and seisin and he doth so accordingly it is no forfeiture Perk. ibidem f. 42. a. If an house fall down by tempest the Lessee for life or yeares hath a speciall interest to take Timber to reedify the same if he will for his habitation but if the Lessee pull down the house the lessor may take the Timber as parcell of his inheritance and besides have an action of Wast and recover treble damages Coke l. 4 f. 63. a. in Harlackendems case A deviseth lands to B. untill eight hundred pounds be levied for the marriage of his daughters his Son and Heire entreth and concealeth the will receiveth the profits before the will is discovered then the devisee entreth receiveth the profits until they amount to six hundred and forty pounds the heir is to supply the rent for the heire shall not take advantage of his own wrong Coke l. 4. Dormit Lex aliquando jus moritur nunquam Coke com 279. b. For as Littleton there hath it it is commonly said that a right cannot dye For of such an high estimation is right in the eye of the Law as that the Law preserveth it from death and destruction trodden it may be but not trodden out for where it hath been said that a release of right doth in some cases enure by way of extinguishment it is so to be understood as here Littleton saith in respect of him that maketh the release or else in respect by construction of Law it enureth not alone to him to whom it is made but to others also who be strangers to the release which as hath been sayd is a quality of an inheritance extinguished As if there be Lord and Tenant and the Tenant maketh a Lease for life the remainder in fee If the Lord release to the Tenant for life the rent is wholly extinguished and he in the remainder shall take benefit thereof and even so when the heire of a disseisor is disseised and the disseisor maketh a release for life the remainder in fee if the first disseisee release to the Tenant for life this shall enure by way of extinguishment because it shall enure to him in the remainder who is a stranger to the release and yet in truth the right is nor extinguished but followeth the possession to wit the tenant for life hath it during his time and he in the remainder to him and his heirs and the right of the Inheritance is in him in the remainder for a right to Land cannot dye or be extinct in deed and therefore if after the death of tenant for life the heire of the disseisor bring a Writ of right against him in the remainder and he joyne the Mise upon the meere right it shall be found for him because in Judgement of Law he hath by the said release the right of the Disseisee for it is commonly and truly said that right never dyeth but is transferred and conveyed by Feoffments Grants Confirmations Prescriptions or Fines c. releases from one man to another so as the Species of it continually remaineth Res inter alios acta alteri nocere non debet factum unius alteri nocere non debet Coke com f. 152. b Things acted among others ought not to hurt either and one mans deed ought not to hurt another and Coke l 9 f. 59. It is the rule of Law and reason prohibetur ne quis faciat in suo quod nocere possit in alieno sic utre tuo ut alienum non laedas it is forbidden least any one should doe that in his own that may hurt another and so use your own that you injure not another If a man hath a Water-course running in a channell of a River up to his house for his necessary ules and a Glover levy a Lime pit for Calve-skins and Sheep-skins so neer his Water-course that the corruption of the Lime pit hath corrupted it by which his tenants goe out of his house for it an action of the case lyeth as is adjudged in 13. H. 6. 26. b. So he who hath severall Piscaries in his own Water shall have an action of the case against him who erecteth a Dye-house by which he maketh slime filth and other dirty things to run out of the said house into the said Piscaries by which he hath totally lost the profit of the said Piscaries vide in the Book of Entries Nusance f 406. b. vide the same in Aldreds case for erecting of a Swine-house plura alia ibidem And so also in Penruddocks case Coke l. 5. and in Batius case l. 11. 54. Where you shall find diverse notable cases to the same purpose Lessee for yeares shall so take his hedge-boote that he doth not destroy common of Estovers which another man hath there 46. E. 3. 17. He which hath common in Land not inclosed shall keep his Cattle out of a stranges Land 20 E. 4. 11. If Beasts be driven by the high way he ought at his perill to keep them out of the Lands adjacent to the high way
except in case where the Owner is bound to inclose 4. E. 4 19. 10. E. 4. 7. But if a man erect a wall part on my Land and part on his own if I distroy that on my Land and the rest by that meanes falleth downe it is excusable If a Feoffment be made to two joyntly one of them cannot dereigne the warranty without the other 48. E. 3. 17. Yet if a villaine and another purchase joyntly and the Lord of the villaine enter into a moyety he may dereigne the Warranty alone for therein the severance groweth by act in Law He that commeth into a Taverne and will not goe out in reasonable time or distraine for rent and killeth the distresse shall be a wrong doer ab initio 12. E. 4. 8. Because he misdemeaneth that the authority the Law giveth him Otherwise it is if I lend my horse to one to ride to York and he rideth him further yet the riding further is not unlawfull neither a generall action of Trespass lyeth against him upon the accord upon the case because he misdemeaneth but the authority that another hath given him Finch Nomot f. 47. If I be distrained and pay my rent and after am denied to have my goods delivered an action of Trespasse or detinue lyeth 21. H. 7. If I deliver a chest to one who breaketh it Trespasse lyeth 2. H. 8. If a Sheriff maketh an arrest and returneth not the Capias an action of Trespasse lyeth 8. E. 49. An executor commandeth the taking of the goods of the Testator and refuseth to prove the will a Trespasse lyeth 8. E. 4. 9. The Sheriff seiseth the goods of one outlawed and doth not charge himselfe in account the Outlawry being reversed or the party pardoned he shall have an action of Trespasse against the Sheriff 21. H. 7. 23. Injuria illata incorpus non potest remitti Reg. I. C. injury which is offered to the body cannot be remitted and the reason given by the Civilians is quia nemo membrorum suorum Dominus because no man is Lord and Master of his members but the power of them appertaine to God our Creator and the Prince our Protector which accordeth with the reason of the common Law which maintaineth as Bracton saith quod cita membra sunt in postate Regis as it is in the record of 19. E. 1. Rot. 36. vita membra sunt in manu Regis that the life and member of every Subject are under the safe-guard and protection of the King to the intent they may serve the King and their Country when occasion shall be offered Nay the Lord of a villaine for the cause aforesaid cannot maihme his villaine but the King shall punish him for mayming of his Subjects by Fine Ransome and Imprisonment untill the Fine and Ransome be paid for that hereby he hath disabled him to doe the King service Coke com f. 127. a. And therefore also doth the Law more carefully provide for the preventing and punishing of such forcible injury in particular between person and person because as Coke com f. 161. b. Max. paci sunt contraria vis injuria forcible injuries are most contrary to the quiet and repose of the Common-wealth which is the publick felicity both of Prince and people As if one doe but menace another with a weapon or staff or if he stretch out his arme or give any other token whereby his intention of striking doth appeare though never a stroake be given yet is it actionable 22. Ass Pl. 60. And upon an assault the Writ was Quare insultum fecit vulneravit maihemavit and though the injury did not appear to be a maihm yet was it allowed 43 E. 4. For the Law favoreth the Plaintiff in such Actions And though force be an enemy to peace yet is it a maxime in our Law Quod quisque in tutelam corporis sui fecerit jure fecisse videatur Fulb. l. 1. f. 91. whatsoever any one doth in defence of his body it seemeth to be done by Law according to the opinion of the Poet. Judice me fraus est concessa repellere fraudâ—m A maque in armatos sumere jura sinunt I doe conceive it a good fraud to be To repell fraud and lawfull eke for me To take up armes ' gainst those I armed see As 2. H. 4 8. Bract. If any man beat me I may lawfully beat him if I cannot escape without stâ—ips wounds or maihmes Nay 9. E 4. 3. I may beate him in defence of my goods or wife contrary to the resolve of 43. Ass 39. That it is not lawfull for me to beat him if I may escape with my life And 9. E 4. A servant may justify a battery in defence of his Master and 17. E. 4. 4. He that cometh in company of him who maketh the assault or cometh in to aid him is a principall Trespassor and if a Justice of Peace see a man doing of an assault he may presently arrest him by commandment or word to the intent that he may find surety of peace 9. E. 4. 3 And by the civill Law if any one do keep or nourish a Masty Dog Beare or Fox or some like beast which doth hurt or damnify another man he that receiveth the hurt shall recover damages against the Owner of the beast Fulb. l. 1. f. 81. And so at the common Law if a man hath a Dog which killeth Sheep and hath notice of the condition of the Dog the master shall be punished for it as may be gathered out of Dyer 28. H. 8. f. 25. Pl. 162. Otherwise if he be ignorant thereof or if it be done without the Masters incitation ibidem f. 19. And whereas in many cases that concerne Lands and Goods the Law doth deprive a man of present remedy and rather then to suffer an inconvenience turneth him over to a further remedy yet if the question be of a personall paine the Law doth give him present remedy because he holdeth no damage a sufficient remedy for a corporall injury which ground as Sir Francis Bacon ingâ—niously observeth some of the Canonists do aptly inferr out of Christs sacred mouth Amen corpus est suâ—ra vestimentum verily the body is more worth then rayment where they say vestimentum comprehendeth all outward things appertaining to a mans condition as Lands and Goods which they say are not in the same degree with that which is corporall Bacon Max. f. 30. As if a Sheriff make a false returne whereby I loose my Land yet because of the inconvenience of drawing things to delays if the Sheriffs returne should not be credited I am excluded of my averrement against it and am put to my action of deceite against the Sheriff and Summoners 5. E. 4. 80. But if the Sheriff upon a Capias returne a Cepy Corpus quod languidus est in prisona I may come in and falsify the returne of the Sheriff to save my imprisonment 3. H. 6. 3. So if a man
making of the banks of a River to be contributory to it for Qui sentit commodum c. Coke l. 7. f. 39. b. If a man grant a Rent-charge for life out of his land and the rent is behind and the Grantor enfeoff A. and the rent is behind in his time and after A. enfeoffeth B. and the rent is behind in his time and then the Grantee dyeth the Executor shall have an action of debt against every of them for the rent behind in his time for qui sâ—ntit commodum c. and so was it holden in Ognels case l. 4. f. 49. a. 50. Barons uses f. 27. If a man bind himself and his Heires in an Obligation or do covenant in writing for him and his Heires or do grant an annuity for him and his Heirs or do make a Warranty of land binding him and his Heires to warranty in all these cases the Heir after the death of the Ancestor is by Law charged with this Obligation Covenant Annuity and Warranty yet with these three cautions 1. That the party must by speciall name bind himself and his Heires 2. That some action must be brought against the Heir whilest the land or other inheritance rested in him unaliened except the land was conveyed away by fraud and one purpose to prevent the Suit intended against him And 3. That no Heire is further to be charged then the value of the land descended unto him from the same Ancestor c. nor to be sold out-right for the debt to be kept in extent at a yearely value untill the debt or damage be run out Neverthelesse for his false plea shall he be charged of his own lands for this Deed of his Ancestor and the reason of this charge is Qui sentit commodum sentire debet incommodum onus vide ibidem plura Dilationes sunt in lege odiosae Ployd f. 75. b. Delaies are tedious in the Law and therefore doth the Law favour Assise because they are the more speedy Suits the Law hath given as the Statute of W. 2. c. 25. in its recitall saith Et quia non est aliquod breve in Cancelaria per quod quaerentes habent tam festinum remedium sicut per breve Nove disseisinae And therefore because it is the more speedy Suit the Law the more greatly favoureth it ibidem For for speed to the Plaintiff the Jurors shal have the view before appearance by the words of the Writ And though Warranties are favoured in Law yet none shall vouch in Assise any one if he be not present and that is for the speed of the Plaintiff No. Nat. br f. 178. And a protection will not defend the party against an assise but assises are accepted by the words of protection p. 2. H. 6. 42. Bâ— protection 53. And all things and pleas which go in retardation or abatement of Assises are esteemed odious and therefore exceptions which will abate other Writs shall not abate Assises if it be so that there is a Disseisor and a Tenant for it is the substance of the Suit and therefore the misnaming of one of the Defendants shall not abate the assise if there be another Disseisin and Tenant and yet the Writ was alwaies false Ploâ—d f. 98. a. b. And if the Tenant plead Joynt-tenancy with a stranger not named although the Plaintiff confesse it yet it shall not abate his assise but for it onely for the remnant the Writ and Plaint shall stand in his force and yet the Plaint was altogether false and if there be a Disseisor and Tenant for any part then it sufficeth for other verity in the Writ or Plaint the Law requireth none and to say that one named in the Writ is dead before the Writ purchased or that there was never any such in rerum natura is alone and shall be adjudged no plea in abatement of the Writ but if there be another Disseisor and a Tenant the Writ shall be good against them Ployd f 90. a. vide ibidem plura And though in actions reall as the weight of the cause requireth there are longer times given in their proceedings then in personall actions yet it appeareth by Fortescue de lib. l. A. c. 5. 3. that they are not too long nor admitted without just cause Crebro enim saith he deliberationibus iuâ—icia matur scunt sed in accelerato processu numquam And as Hobert saith f. 133. Festinatio jâ—stitiae est nâ—verca infortunii Festination of Justice is the step-mother of mischief but many times by deliberations Judgments grow to ripenesse but in over hasty processe never yet the Demandant shall come to a finall end by these actions which he shall never do by prosecution of personall actions for the tryall of a Freehold or Inheritance Co. ep ad lectorem lib. 8. And in all cases the Law favoureth speeding of mens Causes and hateth delayes as 3 H. 6. 15. b. He that pleadeth a Record in delay as to prove the Plaintiff excommunicate must have it ready to shew but otherwise it is if he plead in bar In dilatory pleas both Defendants must joyne 12 H. 7. 1. A Plea in bar that is dilatory must be good to every common intent 8 H. 7. 9. One who is in Court ready to joyn with the Defendant may do it without processe As the Vouchee the Plaintiffs Lessor being prayed in aid of when the Defendant in a Replevin avoweth upon him or the Mesne when the Lord Paramount voweth upon him But Joynder in aid cannot be by an Attorney without processe 2 H. 6. 1. b. One who is a Debtor to the King of Record in the Exchequer if he be seen in the Court may be brought in to answer 2 H. 6 4. b. An assise of Darrein presentment was brought and it was pleaded in abatement of the Writ that the same Plaintiff had brought a Quare impedit against the Defendant for the same Church and the Court was of opinion that it was a good plea for the Quare impedit is of an higher nature for the right and possession and the Statute of W. 2. l. 5. saith that it may be in the election of one to have an assise of Darrein-presentment or a Quare impedit ergo not both And it was adjudged p. 15 Jaco that one cannot have two Quare Impedits of one Church for one avoidance Hutton f. 403. When the Law giveth a man severall remedies for a thing he cannot have both of them together as Littleton saith for then he should recover one thing twice which should be a double charge and a double vexation to the Defendant Co. Com. 145. a. as if I grant by Deed a Rent-charge to another the Grantee hath election to bring a Writ of Annuity and charge the person onely to make it personall or to distrain upon the land and make it reall but he cannot have both after the Grantee hath determined his election but this determination of election must be by action in
quae quidem diaturnitate temporis efficit L. 1 de repub f. 2. ut nonnulla toleranda esse videantur que contra jus boni aequi esse videantur we are to yeild something to custome which certainly by long continuance of time doth effect that some things may seem to be tolerated which seem to be against the rule of right and equity so Moses tolerated and suffered the Jewes libello repudii by a bill of refusall to forsake their wives though the indissoluble bond of matrimony was ordained of God and this dispensation as our Saviour saith was permitted for the hardnesse of their hearts because their hearts through inveterate custome were hardned against that divine ordinance Consuetudo more utentiam approbata vim legis obtinet Bract. l. 3. c. 1. Coke l. 4. f. 21. Consuetudo est altera lex a custome approved by the manner of the users obtaineth the force of a Law and is another Law Arist 1. R. for those things are done by custome as the Phylosopher saith which therefore we doe because we have often done them and when a reasonable act once done was found to be beneficiall and agreeable to the people then did they use and practise it often and so by the reiteration and multiplication of the same became a custome and so being without interruption time out of mind practised for the quiet by the approbation of the people obtained the vigor of a law for as Bo. princep legum Sod de repub l. 1. c. 1. pulus morum magister the Prince is the master founder of laws ordinances and the people of manners and customes Just l. 1. tit 2. which accordeth with the description of Justian quod quisque populus sibi jus constituit id ipsius proprium civitatis est what every people ordaine to be a Law to themselves that is a proper and municipall Law of the City Cicer. in La. Maxima est vis consuetudinis saith the eminent Legist of Rome the force of custome is very great in so much that as by the Law of nature consuetudo est altera natura so by the Law of Nations consuetudo est altera lex for as Coke l. 5. Epist ad lectorem of his own knowledge professeth that at this time all Kingdomes and common Wealths are governed by Laws and that every Nation hath his peculiar and approved Customes which are the most usuall binding and firmest Lawes so as it is said per varios casus artem experientia fecit it may be said per varios usus legem experientia fecit Co. com f. 97. b. There are particular Customes and generall Customes particular Customes are such as are used in some certain County City Towne or Lord-ship and generall Customes are such as are used throughout all England which are the common Law of England In his preface for as Davis the common Law of England is nothing but the common Custome of the Realme and Coke the common Law is nothing else but a common opinion generally received and Finch the common Law is a Law used by prescription throughout the Realme of England Finch Nomot f. 75. Ployd f. 95. a. The common Law is nothing else but common use and the mirror of Justice c. 1. l. 9 The Law is ancient uses warranted by Scriptures and is called the common Law Dav. pref because given to all in generall and to conclude this point with this definition which seemeth to me to include all Custome is a reasonable act iterated multiplied and continued by the people L. 1. R. c. 3. de temps dont memoire ne court time out of minde Aristotle saith injustum est apud omnes praeter consuetudines patrias quicquam agere all Nations hold it unjust to doe any thing against the Customes of the Country which is a principle in our Law that Custome is another Law Ennig Frag. and that we may say with the ancient Roman Poet as he sung of the Romans Moribus antiquis stat resque Britanna virisque The state of England standeth on the ancient Law And though it be jus non scriptum and onely written in the memory of man yet as Sir John Davis it doth far excell our written Lawes namely our Statutes or Acts of Parliament which is manifest in this that when our Parliament have altered In his preface and changed any fundamentall point of the common Law those alterations have been found to be so inconvenient for the Common-Wealth as that the common Law hath been in effect restored againe in some points by other Acts of Parliament in succeeding ages as it is a fundamentall principle of the common Law Quod haereditarium jus omne per feodum simplex transit that all estates of inheritance are fee-simple which the Statute of 13. Ed. 1. de donis conditionalibus intended to limit and to give every man power to create a new estate in taile and establish a perpetuity of his Lands so as the same should not be aliened or letten but during the life of tenant in taile whereupon these inconveniences ensued purchases defeated leases evicted and other estates and grants made upon good consideration avoided creditors defrauded of their just debts and offendors enboldened to commit capitall offences c. who therefore were first barred by common recoveries and then docked by fines 15. E. 3. 14. by Herb. Coke l. 4. Ep. ad lectorem So the Statute of non-claime of 34. E. 3. is against a main point of the common Law whereby ensued the universall trouble of the Kings Subjects and therefore was it altered by the Statute of H. 7. c. 24. Coke ibidem 32. So by the grounds of the Law Lands were not devisable before the Statute of 32 34. H. 8. concerning which dayly experience teacheth us that many subtile and intricate questions arise concerning the construction of Wils to the ruine of many and hindrance of multitudes Coke ibi And it is a politick axiom that the alteration of any fundamentall point of the common Law which is ratified by use and experience is most dangerous and therefore we ought to vote and resolve with all the Earles and Barons in Parliament holden in the twentieth yeare of H. 3. against the Bishops who would have introduced the civil Law Nolumus leges Angliae mutare we will not change the Lawes of England To which purpose I add the asseveration of Cicero ante nostram memoriam terterum morem Frey Cil. de repub ac majorum instituta retinebant excellentes viri before our memory excellent men did retaine the custome of the ancient and the institutes of their elders Optimus legum interpres Consuetudo Co. l. 2. f. 81. a. The best expounder of the Law is custome If land holden by grand Serjanty be aliened without licence it is forfeited by the Common Law because the service of the body cannot be transferred to another 14 E. 3.
sub eo ipse sub nullo nisi tantum sub Deo Bract. l. 1. c. 8. The King is the Vicar and Minister of God upon earth every one is under him and he under none but onely under God and therefore the Lands which are in the Kings possession are free from tenure for a tenant is he which holdeth of some superior Lord by some service so as the King cannot be a tenant because he hath no superior but God for as Coke l. 8 f. 118. It would be against common right and reason that the King should hold of any or doe service to any of his Subjects and therefore all Lands holden of him mediately or immediately Co. com f. 1. and for which reason Cowell thought it not so proper in the Kings case to say that he is seised in dominico suo ut de feodo as if feodum in our Law was taken as it is in the fendall Law onely for the Lands held in Services whereas feodum as Bracton Britton Fleta and Littleton tels us idem est quod haereditas Davis case of Tenures f. 30. Neither can the King be a Joynt-tenant with any though it be of land or other things that he had in his body naturall for none can be equall with him And therefore if two purchase lands to them and their heirs and one be made King they are no more Joynt-tenants but Tenants in Common 3 Eliz 339. Nay Acts of Parliament do not bind him unless they concern the Common-wealth or he be specially named 4. E. 4 21. 1 Eliz. 223. And no man can declare against the King but he must sue by way of Petition Ployd f. 241. b. 18 Eliz 498. He hath the property of all Goods that are nullius in bonis and shall have all Tythes out of Forrests and places out of any Parish for rex est persona mixta cum sacerdote In a Writ of Error upon false Judgment given for the King no Scire facias shall go forth ad audiendum errores for the King is alwaies in Court and that is the cause that the form of Entry is in all Suits for the King in the name of his Attorney generall F.N.B. 21. b. Rex semper praesumitur attendere ardua negotia regni pro publico bono omnium Coke l. 5. f. 56. a. It is alwaies presumed that the King doth attend the weighty and hard things of the Kingdome for the publick good of all And therefore have the Grants of the King a more beneficiall interpretation then the Grants of the Subject that may attend their private Affaires which are alwaies taken more strongly against them As if the King do grant lands to I.S. and his Heirs and in truth I. S. is the Kings Villain that shall not enfranchise the Villain by Implication The same Law is of an Alien born 17. E. 3. 39. The Advowson of Pravondry holden of the King was aliened to an Abbot and his Successors and that the Successors shall hold the Provandry to their own use The King shall seise the Advowson for Alienation in Mortmain and destroy the Appropriation for he shall not be ousted of his right of Advowson by Implication So 2 R. 2. 4. If two be indebted to the King and the King release to one it shall not discharge the other for no prejudice shall accrue to the King by construction or implication upon his Grant more then he truly intended by it ibidem So if a release be made by him of all demands the right of Inheritance shall not be released 6 H. 7. 15. If the King granteth lands in fee upon condition that they do not alien it is good but in all these cases it is otherwise in the case of a common person And in many cases the King who claimeth by a Subject shall be in a better case in respect of the Prerogative incident to his Royall person then the Subject himself by whom he claimeth As if the King have a Rent-seck by Attainder of Treason or by Grant he shall distrain for it not onely in the land charged but also in all his other lands and yet the Subject by whom he claimeth shall not distrain If a Subject have Recognizance or an Obligation and after is outlawed or attainted the King shall seise all the land of the Conusor or Obligor where he himself can have but the Moyety the King shall take advantage of a Condition broken without demand whereas a common person who claimeth under the King cannot re-enter for non payment of Rent without demand made And if the King purchaseth a Lordship of which land is holden by posteriority the King shall have the priority vide ibidem plura in Knights case Davis f. 45. If a common person grant rent or any other thing which lieth in grant onely without limitation of any estate by the delivery of the deed only a Frank-tenement shall passe 17 E. 3. 43. a. If the King grant rent or land without the limitation of any estate the Grant is meerly void for the incertainty 7 Ass pl. 1. and the Grantee shall not be Tenant at Will as it is ruled in the case of Alton Wood. Ployd f. 243. The Grant of the King is taken more strongly against a stranger and more favourable to the King although the thing granted come to the King by purchase or descent Whereas it is otherwise of a common person As a grant of a Mannor by the King the Advowson shall not passe without speciall words So the King may grant a thing in action which another cannot So if the part of an entire thing commeth to the King the Common Law hath given him all As if an Obligation be made to two and one is outlawed the King shall have all the duty So he shall have an entire Horse or Oxe which one who is outlawed holdeth in Common ibidem So Coke l. 9. f. 129. b. Quando jus domini regis subditi in simul concurrunt jus regis preferri debet when the right of the King and the Subject concur and meet together the right of the King ought to be preferred as in Dame Hales case Baron and Feme Joynt tenants of a term for years the Baron is felo de se the Baron shall forfeit all Ployd Com. 262. vide ibidem plura in Quicks case The King may mend his Declaration that term that it is put in p. 13 E. 48. So the King may wave his Demurrer and traverse the plea of another M. 28 H. 6. f. 2. So if the King grant lands in fee with Warranty against all the Patentee shall not have value in recovery without express words to have value So the King may make a Lease to a stranger this reservation is good and the stranger shall distrain for it or have an action of debt after the Lease determined M. 35. H. 6. f. 36. Ployd f. 243. a. So for arrearages of Rent-charge granted to the King he may distrain in all other
is an Accessary Ployd 175. But if it be to kill I. S. and he killeth I. D. mistaking him for I.S. then he is no accessary because it is different in substance And if I bid I. S. to steal such things out of an house without breaking of the house and yet he breaketh the house I am accessary to the Burglary But if a man bid one rob I. S. as he goeth to Sturbridge Faire and he rob him in his house he is not accessary for the variance is of substance Ployd ib. 175. Quando aliquid mandatur mandatur omne per quod pervenitur ad illud Coke l. 5. f. 115. b. when any thing is commanded every thing is commanded whereby we may come to it Whereas a Writ of Estrepment will lye in an action of Wast because he cannot receive more damages then are contained in the Count and can assign no Wast after the Writ purchased if a Writ of Estrepment commeth to the Sheriff by virtue of it he may resist those which will make waste and if otherwise he cannot yet it is lawfull for him to imprison them and to make Warrants to others to do the same and if it be necessary he may take a Posse commitatus for his aid though the words of the Writ onely be that he shall personally go to the Messuage and altogether take order that no wast or estrepment of the said Messuage be according to the foâ—m of the statute whilest the said plea hangeth indiscussed because when any thing is commanded every thing also is commanded by which we may come to it Quando aliquid prohibetur prohibetur id per quod pervenitur ad illud Col. 9. f. 57. a. then any thing is forbidden that also is forbidden by which we come to it As confederation and combination among men uniting themselves together either by obligation or by promise to execute any unlawfull act is punishable by Law before the unlawfull act be executed and the Law punisheth the combination and the confederacy to the end to prevent the unlawfull act and therefore the usuall commission of Oyer and Terminer giveth power to the Commissioners to enquire of all combinations confederacies and false allegiancies and false allegiance is a false binding of anyâ— one to another by Obligation or promise to execute an illoyall act Boni judicis est lites dirimeâ—e expedit reipub ut sit finis litium propter communem omnium utilitatem Coke l. 5. f. 73. b. It is the part of a good Judge to cut off strifes and it is profitable to a Common-weal that there be an end of Suits for the common good of all in Williams case When a Chappell is not private to the Lord and his Family but is publick and common to all the Tenants of the same Mannor who may be many and of great number there no action upon the case lieth against the Vicar who ought and is bound by prescription by himself or some other to celebrate Divine Service in his Chappell c. for then every one of his Tenants may also have an action upon the case as well as the Lord himself and so infinite actions for one default but it is the part of a good Judge to break and put of suits and strifes c. and it is profitable to the Common-wealth that there be an end of suits for otherwise great oppression may be under the colour and pretext of Law For as Coke l. 6 f. 9. a. If there should be no end of suits then a rich and malicious man will by actions and suits infinitely vex him who hath right and in the end because he cannot attain to any end compell him to redeem his charge and vexation and to leave and relinquish his right vide ibidem plura And therefore Coke l. 9. f. 73. b. Accords with satisfaction are much favoured in Law for the interest of the Common wealth that there may be an end of suits and Coke com f. 306 b. every plea ought to be tryable for without tryall the case will never come to an end which would be discommodious to the republick And therefore doth the Law shun circuity of actions and such actions as are needless and may be saved and as Coke l. 5 f. 31. Circuitus est evitandus As if he that hath ten pounds issuing out of certain land disseiseth the Tenant of the land In an assise brought by the Disseisee the Disseisor shall cut off the rent in the damages insomuch as if the mean profits of the land were at the value of thirteen pounds the Disseisee shall recover but three l. 3 H. 6. 18. and the Disseisor shall cut of all the damages he hath expended in repairing the houses 14 E. 3. 92. and if Rent-service happen during the Disseisin it shall be cut off 9 E. 3. 8. and the reason of the cutting off in such case is because that otherwise the arrearages of the rent-service charge or seck shall be revived and therefore to avoid cercuity of action the arrearages during the Disseisin shall be cut off in damages Coke com f. 265. a. If there be Father and Son and the Father be disseised and the Son living the Father releaseth to the Disseisor all his right which he hath or may have in the same Tenements without clause of Warranty and then the Father dieth the Son may lawfully enter upon the possession of the Disseisor because he had no right in the land in his Fathers life but the right descended to him after the release made yet if there had been a Warranty annexed to the release then the Son should be barred for the Warranty may rebutt and bar him and his Heires of a future right which was not in him at that time and the reason wherefore a Warranty shall bar a future right is for avoiding of circuit of action as he that made the Warranty should recover the land against the Ter-tenant and he by force of the Warranty to have as much in value against the same person ibidem Upon the grant of a Ward with Warranty the Defendant in a Writ of right of Ward may rebutt the Plaintiff by that Warranty and shall not be driven to bring an action of Covenant for avoiding circuit of action Finch f. 55. In an action of Waste upon a lease of yeares by Deed and in the same Deed the Lessor granteth to the Lessee that he shall not be impeached of waste the Lessee may plead this in an action of waste and shall not be driven to bring an action of Covenant for avoiding circuit of action When a Father enfeoffeth his Son and Heir with Warranty and dieth now the Son in a Praecipe brought against him may vouch the Feoffor of his Father for the Law will not suffer him to vouch himself and when he cometh in as Voucher then to deigne the Warranty for the circuity of Voucher Malificia non debent manere impunita impunitas continuum
Dower and distraineth the tenant albeit the grant of Mesne was to acquit him against the Lord and his heires onely yet because she continued the State of her husband and the reversion remained in the heire this grant of the acquittall did extend to his wife for Qui haeret Quoties in verbis nulla est ambiguitas ibi nulla expositio contra verba ipsa fienda est Coke l. 7. f. 24. a. So often as there is no ambiguity nor doubt in the words there no exposition against the expresse words is to be made If A. by Deed granteth rent out of the Mannor of D. to have and receive it to him and his heires and further granteth by the same Deed that if the rent be behind that the grant shall distraine in the Mannor of S. both the Mannors are charged the one with the rent the other with the distresse for the rent the one issueth out of the Land and the other is to be taken upon the Land for here a rent is granted expresly to be issuing out of the Mannor of D. and the parties have expresly limited out of which Land the rent shall issue and in which the distresse shall be taken and the Law shall not make any exposition against the expresse words and intention of the parties when it can stand with the rule of Law for where there is no ambiguity in the words there is no exposition to be made contrary to the expresse words ibidem in Calvins case Exception Yet as Mr. Ploydon saith f. 18. b. The words of the Law of nature of the Law of the Realme and the Law of God will yeild and give place to some acts and things done against the words of the same Laws and that is when they are infringed to avoid greater inconveniences or for necessity or by conpulsion For inconvenience It is a rule in the Law that factum unius alteri nocere non debet no mans deed ought to hurt another but there is another maxime that it is better to suffer a mischeife then an inconvenience which is to be preferred before it Coke com 152. b. As if there be Lord Mesne and Tenant and the Tenant holdeth of the Mesne by five shillings and the Mesne holdeth over by the service of twelve pence if the Lord purchaseth the Tenancy the Mesnalty is extinct because when the Lord hath the Tenancy he holdeth of the Lord next parament to him and if he should hold of him that was Mesne then he should hold the same Tenancy immediately of two Lords which should be inconvenient and the Law will that we rather suffer a mischeife then an inconvenience Littleton so as the rule is regularly true res inter alios acta alteri nocere non debet what thing is acted among some must not hurt an other but with this exception unlesse an inconvenience should follow Coke ibidem So it is a Maxime in the Law that a warranty of a collaterall Ancestor if it descend upon him shall bar the heire as if A. disseise B. of Land and selleth the Land and the Alienee obtaineth a warranty of the Ancestor collaterall to the Disseissee after whose death the warranty discendeth upon the Disseissee the Disseissee by descent of the warranty upon him is barred for ever in Law Doctor and Student l. 2. c. 501. but though they all offended in obtaining of the said collaterall warranty yet such an offence is not to be considered in the Law for the inconvenience that thereupon might ensue for it is holden for an inconvenience as Coke saith Com. 152 b. That any of the Maximes of the Law should be broken though a private man suffer losse for that by infringing of a Maxime not onely a generall prejudice to many but in the end a publick incertainty and confusion would follow lex citius tolerarâ— vult privatum damnum quam publicum malum and Law will sooner suffer a private injury then a publick evil neither in such cases is there any remedy to be had in the Chancery or in conscience for it was resolved in Beverlys case Coke l. 4. f. 124. a. That against an expresse maxime of the common Law no man shall have releife in Chancery for it should be in subversion of a principle or ground of Law Doctor and Student ibidem vide ibidem plura So Ployd 18. b. It is against the Law of nature and the Law of reason to beate the person of any man in any cases yet when a man is mad and of non sanae memoriae and doth much evill a man and his Parents also may take him binde him and beate him with rods and may justify it 22. Ass Pl. 56. And by the Statute of Mar. it is generally prohibited that none shall drive any distresse out of one County into another and yet it is adjudged that if one hold Land of a Mannor in another County that the Lord may distraine and drive the distresse of the Land holden of the Mannor in the County where the Mannor is and that is in avoidance of the inconvenience for it should be a great damage to the Lord if he should not drive the distresse to his owne mannor for the avoidance of which the Law is not offended although the words of the Law be broken M. 1. H. 6. Pl. f. 3. A man priviledged in some Court is sued in London and the Action is actionable no where else yet upon a supersedeas the Court shall surcease Finch Nomot And wee see also that necessity in all Lawes shall be a good excuse and that all Lawes give place to necessity according to the common proverbe necessitas non habet legem necessity hath no Law And therefore in a precipe quod reddat the tenant shall excuse his default by a flood of water and yet every default is abhorred in our Law because it is a contempt of the Court but because by perill of death he could not come the necessity of the chance in such case in regard there was no default in him shall excuse him M. 38. H. 6. 11. So the words of the Law of God may be infringed by necessity without offence to God and therefore in the old Law by the Law of God it was prohibited that none should eate of the shew bread and yet it appeareth that David for necessity of famine did eate the said bread and yet he did not breake the Law as our Saviour Christ declareth in the Gospell so the Apostles of our Saviour did pull the eares of Corne of other persons and did eate them and that for necessity of famine Ploydon f. 19 a. So if a man steale victualls to satisfie his present hunger this is no Felony nor Larceny Stanford because it is for the conservation of life And if diverse be in danger of drowning by the casting away of some Boats or Barge and one of them get to some Planke or on the Beats side to keep him above water and
words in a condition shal be taken out of their proper sense ut res magis valeat quam pereat Coke com 213. a. If one giveth Lands to two and the heires of their two bodies ingendred the Donees have joynt estates for life and severall inheritances for if one of the Donees hath issue and dyeth the other shall have all by survivor during his life but if the Survivor hath issue and dyeth then the issue of the one shall have the one moiety and the issue of the other the other moiety of the Land and shall hold the Land together in common and the cause why they shall have severall inheritances is for that they cannot by any possibility have an heire between them engendred and when the grant is impossible to take effect by the letter there the Law shall-make such constâ—uction as the guift by possibility may take effect Co. 83. b. If Lessor of an house for twenty yeares maketh a Lease for two yeares rendring rent and after granteth all his terme and interest to another if the Lessee atturne the Reversion shall passe and if no Atturnement be had yet the ieterest in the Reversion shall passe so as the Grantee shall have the Land after the two yeares determined for the grant of one shall not be adjudged void if to any intent it may take effect Coke l. 4. f. 53. b. If a Termor grant his Terme Habendum immediate post mortem suam the Grantee shall have it presently ut res magis valeat quam periat Noy Max. f. 16. So if a man make a Lease for ten yeares and after for twenty yeares the latter shall be a good Lease for ten yeares after the first is expired Ibidem A release of all Actions against a Prior and Covent shall be construed all Actions against the Prior for an Action cannot be brought against the Covent Coke l. 1. f. 76. Gardiner and Bredons case Tenant for life of Land the Remainder in taile Tenant for life and he in the first Remainder in taile joyne in a fine sur conusans de droite come ceo c. to another in fee who granted a Rent charge of forty pounds to tenant for life it was agreed by all the Justices that the fine levied by tenant for life him in the first Remainder was no discontinuance of the first Remainder in taile nor of the second because every of them did only give that they may lawfully give and no forfeiture in the case be cause the law which abhorreth all wrong shal conster it first to be the grant of him in the Remainder in taile and then the grant of Tenant for life ut res magis valeat quam pereat but if a Feoffment had been made by word then it is the surrender of Tenant for life and the Feoffment of him in the Remainder Ibidem Coke l. 1. f. 45 a. In 2. R. 3. 4. it is holden by Starky and others that if the Patent of the King may be taken to two intents good then it shall be taken more beneficially for the King but if it may be taken to one intent good and to another intent void then it shall be taken to that intent to make the grant good and not to that intent to make it void ut res magis valeat c. vide ibidem plura in Alton Woods case Coke l. 5. f. 8. a. In Cessavit where the Tenure is alledged by Homage Fealty and Rent and the Demandant counteth that in doing the said services he did cease it shall be taken by construction to such services onely of which a man may cease 6. H. 7. 7. as of Rent and not of Homage and Fealty and the reason of this is ne res destruatur least the thing should perish vide ibidem plura Ployd f. 197. b. Anthony Browne Justice said that it is an office of a Judge to expound the thing ut res magis valeat quam pereat and to make all parts of the Deed and intention of the parties also to agree together Coke l. 4. f. 4. If I grant to you that you and your heires shall distraine for a rent of forty shillings to wit within my Mannor of S. that by construction of Law shall amount to a grant of a Rent out of my Mannor of S. for if it shall not amount to a grant of a rent the grant would be of little force or effect if the Grantee shall not have but a nude distresse and no rent in him for then he shall never have an Assize of it and for that reason it hath been often times ruled that it shall amount to the grant of a Rent by construction of Law ut res magis valeat 3. E. 3. 12. c. Benedicta est expositio quando res redimitur a destructione Coke l. 4. f. 25. b. Blessed is the exposition when the thing is redeemed from destruction every Mannor which consisteth of Frank-tenements and Copy-holders hath two severall Courts the Court of Frank-tenements wherein the Suitors are Judges and is called the Court Baron and the Court of Copy-holders wherein the Lord or Steward of the Mannor are Judges and if all the Tenements escheate or the Lord release the tenure and service of his Frank-tenements yet the Lord may hold his Court of Copy-holds and make admittance and grant of them ne res destruatur it is a ground in Law verba debent intelligi ut aliquid operetur Coke l. 8. f. 24 words must so be understood that they must worke some thing and not be idle and frivolous in Edward Foxes case wherein it was resolved that a demise and grant upon consideration of fifty pound for ninty nine yeares amounted to a bargaine and sale for the said yeares for when a Frank tenement or tenement passeth by Deed indented and inrolled it is not necessary to have those precise words of bargaine and sale but words which amount to so much are sufficient as if a man covenant in consideration of mony to stand seised to the use of his Son in fee if the Deed be enrolled it is a good bargaine and sale and yet there are no words of a bargaine and sale but amount to as much Coke l. 7. f. 40. So if a man for mony alien and grant Land to one and his heires or in tail or for life by Deed indented and enrolled it shall amount to a bargaine and sale and the Land shall passe without any livery and seisin It is a ground in Law verba sunt accipienda cum effectu Coke l. 4. f. 51. a. b. Words are to be taken with effect as if a man hath in the right of his wife any estate in Fee-simple Fee-taile or for terme of life c. the Baron shall have all the arrerages as well before marriage as after the death of his wife by the Statute of 10. H. 6. 11. for though by the Common Law the Executors c. of the wife might have an Action