these reasons grounded vpon the Law of nature and giuen by Iustice Stamford in his booke fo 194. saith he to this effect men will now eschew those Capitall crimes when they shall sée those persons who in nature and affection are néerest and dearest vnto them and most to bee beloued shall be punished with themselues so that if themselues will not refraine such crimes for themselues yet they should the rather refraine for the loue of their wife children vpon whom they bring so perpetuall losse and punishment and staine of so infamous a note as that their stocke blood and Lineage shall be corrupted and attainted their children disinherited and the wiues of their bosomes because the wiues of such impious and foolish Husbands by their defaults depriued of all their meanes and liuelihood And Breton fo 258. makes another reason why a wife of a man attainted c. shall lose her Dower est pur ceo que est a supposer que el scauoit del felony son mary and by him a woman lost no Dower in case the felony were committed before Couerture King Edward the sixt in the first yeare of his Reigne abrogating some Statutes concerning treasons or felonie for their austerity and making some new decrees concerning treason preserued Dower against all perpetrations of an euill husband But 5. 6. eiusdem regis ca. 11. by the last prouiso It was againe enacted that no Wife of any person attainted of treason should bee receiued to demand or haue Dower c. Yet for felonie 1. Ed. 6. is still in force And treasons by Act 5. Eliz. ca. 1. for assurance of her Maiesties royall power or by the Act eodem anno cap. 11. against clipping washing rounding or filing of Coynes or by the Act 18. Eliz. ca. 1. against diminishing or impayring the Quéenes Coyne or other coyne currant here doe none of them make any corruption of blood or forfeiture of Dower Note if after attainder the Baron purchase his pardon this is so farre forth a new birth vnto him that his Wife shall haue Dower of the Lands which come to him after pardon if his Issue by her may per possibilitie inherite Par. 75. And remember this Case 3. 4. Phi. Marie Dyer 140. b. Marie the wife of Sir Iohn Gate attainted of treason brought a Writt of Dower against Wiseman the attainder of Sir Iohn was certainly pleaded in barre she replyed that long time before the attainder and before the treason committed after the Espousals the said Sir Iohn Gate was seised in fee of the Land whererof she demands Dower and thereof enfeoffed A. B. whose estate the tenant hath vpon a demurrer without argument at barre or bench the Councell of the parties being heard in Iustice Brookes Chamber the demandant was barred of Dower by opinion of all the Iustices because the Statute is The Wife of a man attainted of any manner of treason whatsoeuer shall in no wise bee receiued to aske challenge demand or haue dower of any her Husbands Lands during the force of that attainder And by Stamford 195. this extendeth to petty treason But nota saith Dyer the Lands here sold and gone before treason committed were neuer subiect to forfeiture or escheate vt in causa Vauisor M. Littleton in the Chapter of Dower And therefore Antho Browne Serieant was angrie at the heart for this Iudgement See Littleton fo 11. per Vauisor If a man commit felonie aliene his land and then be attainted the Wife shall haue action of Dower against the Feoffée but not against the King or Lord if it be escheated SECT XVIII The Husbands power in his wiues inheritance and of discontinuance A Womans Inheritance is Lands of Inheritance which she hath by descent or purchase and her Marriage such as was giuen her in Franke Marriage by learned M. Littleton But take heere all fée-simple or fée-taile which she hath sole by her selfe or ioyntly with some other to be her Inheritance Then know that at Common Law a man seised in the right of his Wife of greene acre may make a feoffement of it to a stranger and this is such an interruption called a discontinuance of the wiues estate that not onely the Baron is bound whilest he liueth but the Wife also when he is dead is by common Law forbidden entry into her owne land and put to her action of cui in vita but if a man seised in the right of his wife be disseised and release to the disseisor though it bee with warrantie this is no Discontinuance If a man seised in fée in the right of his Wife haue Issue by her a sonne and die and then a second Husband makes a Lease of the Land for terme of his life and the Wife dyeth if now the Lessée surrender to the second Baron it is a question whether the sonne can enter during the life of lease for life But cleere saith Littleton when he is dead the son may enter for the discontinuance which was but forthe life was determined If Tenant in the right of his Wife make a Lease for his owne life the reuersion in fée is in the Baron If hee die in the life time of his Wife and of the Lessee and his heyre grant the reuersion with atturnament now though the grantee enter after the death of the Lessee yet the wife may re-enter for as an estate taile cannot be discontinued but by one which is seised by force of the intaile so the estate of a Wife is not discontinuable but by him which is seised in the wiues right SECT XIX Of a Remitter YOu must vnderstand somewhat also of a Remitter And because women learne faster by example then by precept I will not stay to define a Remitter Baron and Feme seised together in speciall taile haue Issue a daughter the wife dyeth the Baron catcheth another wife hath Issue by her another daughter discontinueth the taile disseiseth the discontinuee and dieth now is the Land descended to the two daughters the eldest daughter is remitted that is remaunded and setled in the ancient estate for a moitie and driuen to a Formedone against her Sister for the other moity for here the Sisters are by seuerall titles tenants in common not parceners If Tenant in taile infeoffe a Feme sole and die and then his sonne being vnder age intermarrieth with the Feme Feoffée this is a remitter to the Sonne and his wife which before had fée-simple hath now nothing at all in the land But if the sonne had beene of full age at the time of espousals hee had not regained the ancient estate but stood seised onely in droit sa feme If a Woman seised c. take a husband which alieneth in fee and then takes backe an estate to him and his wife for life this reprisall though it were by Indenture or by fine is meerely the act of the Husband and the woman sans folly is adiudged in her Remitter the reuersion of the
according to the will and died Now the question is whâ— the Issue in taile or Deuisée of the remainder should haue this Land Et per iudicium curiae Partly because his mother had waued the estate taile and although shee had not done so yet because he could not conuey his title and discent but aswell as heyre to his father as to his mother the fine with proclamations leuied onely by his father barres him So farre goeth the Booke And you may obserue that it barres the wife if she will See also 5. Eliz. 224 in Dyer the husband leuied a fine with proclamations of his owne land and after fiue yeares died his widdow continuing sole of full age whole memory out of prison within compasse of the foure Seas and doth not make any demand or claime of dower within 5. yeers after her husbands death quaere if he which pleadeth in barre of Dower ought expresly to auerre this The question was if she were barred of Dower Dyer telleth vs termino Hillarij 4. H. 8. rotulo 344. such a barre pleaded was admitted good for the ground of Dower was the Husbands seisin and the action giuen by his death So that it is within the second sauing of 4. H 7. which preserueth to all which are not parties pursuit of right growne after the fine by or vpon cause before the fine so that they take it within fiue yeares In Plowden fo 373. Iustice Dyer arguing Stowell and the Lord Zouches case affirmes the learning which I haue recited out of his owne booke But Plowden inserts his note that he takes the Law to be otherwise and that a woman is bound to no time of her Dower after such a fine for saith he the ayme of 4. H. 7. as against future droicts is wholly against such rights as either suffered wrong before the fine or by the fine and in this case of Dower the title is all after the fine and standeth well in accord with it not touched by the Statute the woman therefore may demand when she listeth So if there be a cessor begun a yeare before a fine with proclamations continued a yeare after the Lord is not restreyned at the end of 5. or 15. yeares to bring a cessauir so he saith likewise if a morgage be disseised a fine lenied by the Disseisor with Proclamations passed yet the morgager paying his mony to the Morgagee may at any time within 5. years or more after the payment re-enter When Giants fight Pigmées may not part them but howsoeuer some incertainty arise in euery corner of the Law this is here certaine that a fine leuied by the husband onely of his owne land tolleth not the wiues action of Dower if she come in time And a fine so leuied by him of the wiues Land taketh not away her seasonable entry but the gulfe that swalled vp entrie action right and all possibility of reducement by Law is a fine lawfully leuied by baron and feme where forsooth because a woman is examined by a Iustice or one that hath a Dedimus potestatem c. and acknowledgeth her frée consent and agréement what cannot men get wiues to doe if they list she shall be barred and for euer excluded of a great many acres of ground for a few kisses and a gay gowne That is a fine finem litibus imponens for till it be done and dispatcht the poore woman can haue no quiet her husband keepes such a iawling SECT XXIX Of common recoueries AS for trickes of Common recoueries I perceiue not how that can be greatly preiudiciall to women for first if a man will suffer a faigned recouery of his owne Land to defeate his wiues Dower she may falsiâ—â—e it c. sée the Eiectione firmae per Eare against Snow Plowd fo 515. the baron there being tenant in taile his wife hauing nothing in the Land he and his wife suffered a common recouery with voucher to his owne vse c. the opinion of all the Iustices was that though the woman suruiued yet the estate taile shal be barred for it was found precisely by verdict that the wife had no interest in the Inheritance The baron therefore which alone lost estato taile by the recouery might recouer alone estate taile in value But as for the wife no man can say what estate shee had nor whether she should haue a quod ei deforceat or a Writt of right if she had lost the land by default So likewise hauing lost by the recouery nothing or no man can tell what her recompence in value must be She was named said the Iustices vpon intent to barre her of Dower and such is the meaning of husbaÌ„ds which wil haue their wiues named in such recoueries but cleere the estate taile is barred if in this case the wife might sue execution in value against the vouchée by estoppell yet the issue in taile should not be concluded by the act of his Father but he might oust her of that which she had so recouered in value c. see Sir E. Cokes 10. Rep. 43. a. in Mary Portingtons ca. that the vsage hath béen alwayes vpon common recoueries against Baron and Feme to examine the wife and to grant a dedimus potestatem to take vpon her examination her Conusance as in case of a Fine But let the case be Tenant iure vxoris is agréed with Iohn a Stile to suffer a recouery of his wiues Lands to certaine vses comprised in Indentures betwixt them two a Writ of entry in the post is brought against the Baron and Feme which appeare in person or by Atturney calling to warranty the common vouchée a man well worth a couple of new rosted egges which re-enters into warrantie Then after declaration and imparlance at the day of the appearance shall the demandant recouer against Baron and Feme and they in right of the Wife shall recouer against the Vouchee of such lands as he hath or is like to haue when time hath a hairy crowne shall this recouery or possibility of vnlikely recouery in value binde the wife when the Baron is dead whether she will or no by Brooks nouell cases 23. H. 8. pl. 37. it séemes that such a recouery did then bind the wife to but without examination mee thinks it should not bind the wife The Statute of 32. is that none Act of the Barons shall make discontinuance c. except onely a Fine by Baron and Feme Ergo such a recouery notwithstanding though it be executed the wife may enter See 23. Eliz. cap. 3. and there is a sauing to euery Feme couert or her heyres her Writt of error to be sued within 7. yeares after she become sole for reuersing of Fines and recoueries past if they must be reuersed by error it séemes without error they were very dangerous For a rule to conclude withall take this That wheresoeuer the Baron doth any thing out of Court which thing he and his Wife were compellable to doe it
this Warrantor be vnder age yet the Law fauoureth widdowes so much that the plaint shal not attend his full age Therefore if the Tenant shew forth any Charter Déed or speciall cause whereby the Court may perceiue that the Infant is bound to Warrantie by the Ancestors act he shall answer presently what age soeuer he be of And though the Infant in ward be aliened by his Gardian or Gardians from hand to hand this shall not preiudice the Voucher for alwayes he shall vouch to warrantie the Heire and not the Gardian who is bound to present his ward so vouched in Court without difference whether it be one or many parceners Thus saith Britton and 48. Ed. 3. fol. 5. agreeth that he which voucheth an heire vnder age must vouch him in ward de vntiel If he be a ward it is said there also that hee which voucheth an heire at full age must shew a Déed quaere But when the lands are in the Gardians owne possession to his owne profit and vse the writ of Dower must â—ée brought against the Gardian and not against the Infant 46. Ed. 3. fol. 19. Where Mowbray saith where an Infant is vouched in ward of the King the woman shall recouer Dower maintenant 3. H. 6. fol. 17. It was agréed per curiam that in Action of Dower if the tenant vouch the heire in the Kings ward within the same Countie where the writ is brought the Demandant shall not recouer before the warrantie be determined but the Law is contra if the Voucher had prayed summons in another Countie for then the Demandant should recouer maintenant yet by the Register fol. 7. if in a writ of Dower the tenant vouch in Durham the Demandant shall abide triall of the warrantie and not recouer presently But by Fitzherbert for a rule in titulo Voucher if the tenant vouch in a forraine Countie shee shall recouer maintenant and neuer attend triall of the warrantie but when Voucher is in mesme lâ— countie If the heire vouched to warrantie aftâ—r â—hee hath appeared and countâ—â— pleaded the warrantie or before appearance being lawfully summoned do 〈…〉 ke default the Defendant shall haue execution against him maintenant if hee haue lanâ—s within the Countie Brooke Dower 5. And also Dower the 6â— when the heire is vouched in the same Countie the woman shall recouer against the heire Dyer 3. Eliz. â—â—â— In Dower the tenant vouch the heire in the same Countie who co 〈…〉 as one that hath nothing by descent in â—ée and renders Dower the tenant auers that he hath assâ—â—â— by descent qu 〈…〉 if he should not say in fée for by Weston and Browne if the lands be in taile it doth not 〈…〉 the tenants lanâ—s And the opinion of the Court was that the Demandant shall haue Iudgement presently aga 〈…〉 the heire if he hath lands c. and if not against the tenant and that before the issue of the assâ—â—s tried 1 Ed. â— fol. 24 In a writ of Dower against Tenant for life if he vouch his Lessor which is heire to the husband the woman shall recouer against the Tenant and he ouer against the Vouchee But when the heire iâ— vouched by Charter of his Ancestor the Demandant shall 〈…〉 couer against the Vouchee and the Tenant shall hold 〈…〉 peace Yet in a Writ of Dower against Lessée for 〈…〉 e of the Barons demise if the heire bee vouched to Warrantie though here the reuersion which is the cause of the Warrantie were made by the Baron the Demand 〈…〉 shall recouer against the Tenant and he against the heire If the tenant vouch in a writ of Dower and the Vouch 〈…〉 counter plead the Warrantie the woman shall recouer maintenant though in other actions it bée otherwise 46. Ed. 3. fol. 25. and 49. Ed. 3. fol. 23. In a Writ of Dower the Tenant vouched himselfe to sâ—â—e the 〈…〉 taile 2. H. 4. fol. 18. in Dower the Tenant vouched the heire Processe went on to sequatur sub suo periculo sicut alias the Vouchée came not it was awarded the Demandant should recouer against the Vouchée if hee had lands in the same Countie If not that shee shall recouer against the Tenant and hee ouer in value But first it was examined if the Vouchee were heire to the Baron 21. Ed. 3. fol. 30. In Dower the tenant voucheth the Barons heire in ward of the demandant per cause de nurture shewing the Ancestors Déed he was compelled to plead in barre because now the woman might be endowed De la plus beale for Gardeine pur nurture hath alwayes intendment to Soccage tenure Vide Brooke Dower 42. 5. Ed. 3. The fathers wife was endowed the Grandmother brought a writ of Dower against her â—he vouched the heire in reuerston the Demandant recouered against the tenant and shee against the heire a third part of two parts remaining but not in value Sée Brooke Dower 79. If the Grandmother die the mother may enter into the first dower and the heire into the second SECT IX Plees in a writ of Dower ADmitting there were no Voucher let vs run ouer other matters vsually pleaded 14. H. 4. 33. in Dower was demanded a third part of two mils of other lands yâ— tenant asked Iudgement of the plaintiffe for they were during the whole time of couerture but the â—â—te of two mills viz. toâ—ts 38. Ed. 3. fol. 13. In a writ of dower against one as Gardian of land and heire of K. de R. the defendant answered that the Infants father was â— de R. Iudgement del briefe and if the writ were good hee was ready to render dower You cannot said Knyuet plead to the writ render dower both at one day so the demandant praying Iudgement seisen was awarded her And because she auerred that the defendant was not touts temps prist to render dower an Inquest of dammages was awarded and that execution should cease till the Inquest were past 13. Ed. 4. fol. 7. In action of dower the tenant pleaded touts temps prist de render Dower vncore est The demandant said that I. S. her husband died seised and that such a day and yeere she required the tenant to indow her at Dale which refused c. he replyed that at the same day he offered to goe with her to the lands and to assigne her dower but she refused sans ceo that he refused The Court held the Issue well taken by this speciall pleading But if hee had said generally and barely hee refused not some thought it had not beene sufficient insomuch as it denies not the request Bryan said the demandant here might not haue seuerall Iudgements of one thing for note shee was to recouer dower vpon the first plea but all the other Iustices were of opinion cleere that shee should haue Iudgement of Dower maintenant and 18. Ed. 3. In action of Dower Iudgement was to recouer dower with an inquest for dammages As in a Quare
to be recouered after the first day of December next comming in the forme aforesaid should appertaine to enter into all and euery of the Premisses and peaceably to possesse and enioy the same in such manner and forme as he or they should haue done if no such discontinuance warranty or recouery had beene had or made And if any of the said husbands and women or any other seised or that shall be seised to the vse oâ— them of the estate afore specified after the said first of December doe make or cause to be made or suffer any such discontinuance alienations warranties or recoueries in forme aforesaid that then it shall be lawfull to the person or persons to whom the said manors lands and tenements should or ought to belong after the decease of the woman to enter into the same and to possesse and enioy them according to such title and interest as they should haue had in the same if the woman had béene dead no discontinuance warranty nor recoueries had as against the said husband during his life if the discontinuance alienation warranties and recoueries he hereafter had by or against the same husband and woman during Couerture and espousals betwixt them â—â—â—uided that the said women after the decease of their said husbands may reenter and enioy c. according to their first estate And ouer this it is enacted that if the woman at the tune of such discontinuance alienation recouery warranty c. besole that then shee shall bee barred and excluded of her title and interest in the same from thenceforth and the person or persons to whom the title interest and possession of the same should belong after the womans decease shall immediately after the discontinuance alienation warranty and recouery enter possesse and enioy the same Manors Lands c. according to his or their title Prouided that this Act extend not to auoid any recouery discontinuance or warranty after the forme aforesaid heretofore had made or suffered but only where the husband and wife or either of them now being aliue or any other to their vse now haue title and Interest to the said Manors c. or take the issues and profits to their vseâ— Prouided also that this Act extend not to any recouery or discontinuance where the heire next inheritable to the woman or â—e or they that next after â—er deatâ— should haue estate of inheritance c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or agréeing to the reâ—â—uerieâ— where â—he same assâ—ent and agréement is of record or inrowled Prouided also that it shall bee lawfull to euery woman being â—olâ— or married after the death of her first husband to giue sâ—ll discontinue c. for terme of her life only after the course of the common Law SECT XXXIV The Expâ—sition BEfore this Statute if Tenant in Dower had aliened in fée with warranty and dyed the warranty discending vpon him in reuersion had barred him for against collaterall warranty of Tenant in Dower or for life the Statute of Gloucester cap. 3. determined nothing Lâ—â—â—â—eton fol. 164. He addeth that if the heire were vnder age both at time of alienation and also when the warranty discended hée should hee at no preiudice by this collaterall warranty But if he wore vnder age at time of the alienation and came afterward to full age during the womans life and neuer entered then perchance hee should be barred This was Law when Littleton wrote and had continued so aboue two hundred yéeres and during the raigne of nine Kings after the making of Glocester cap. 3. which Statute Dyer comparing with the later he reputes the last cruell against women for by this Aâ—t of 11. Hen. 7. all alienations recoueries releases and warranties of Tenant in Dower or â—oynture of the husbands lands are of no strength And where Glocester alloweth Tenant by the curtesie to alien with warranty and assets this from women is cleane taken away this he saith is vn case fort dure That if a woman â—oyntresse in taile whose warranty is lincall to her heires doe aliâ—n and leaue assets yet the heire may enter Therefore hee is of the minde that this Statute being rigoroâ—s of it selfe ought to receiue a streâ—t and litterall interpretation fol. 148. But Stamford Browne Brook eâ—poâ—â—ded these words giuen by the Ancestors to bée intendible of all manner of assurances for money or otherwise There are two Cases in Plowden that inâ—ued great Argraments vpon this Statute The first is betwixt Winibishe and Falboâ—es a man enfâ—offed diuers persons to the vse of himselfe and his wise in speciall taile before the Statute of 27. Heâ— 8. of vses and after the Statute the husband died a stranger recouered in a formedone per ment deduc the first day by couin and vpon false tiâ—le he to whom the title appertained after the womans death entred and the entry waâ— adiudged lawfull though hee could not haue Iudgement for a default in the pleading and that was want of certainty in his replication and not shewing how he was heire or the party to whom the entry was giuen by the Statute The greatest matter vpon the Statute obiected to inforce a proofe that the widdow which suffered the recouery was not bound by this Act was that she held not ioyntly with her husband any lands or tenements but only shée was seised of an vse in taile for they tooke it cleare on all paâ—ts that the case came into consideration as if the Act of 27. had not béene made and that seemes to bee directly within the letter of the Lawes But Montague chiefe Iustice shewing how greatly the marriage of women and their aduancement by it is respected in Law as appeareth by the Writ of â—aâ—â—a matrâ—moâ—iâ— proloâ—â—â—i and the â—â—i ante diuâ—rtium taken by equity of West 2. cap. â— and also by that that where donées in frankemarriage are diuorced the woman shall haue all the lands aâ—â—irmeth it to bee reason against such women thus fauored and who abuse such fauors as the Law bestowes vpon them and will be of Couin and Faâ—â—ity to impaire their deceased husbands inheritance and disinhe it their heires to construe this Law for their coâ—â—â—â—tion for the Law-makers of the statute were bent extremely against them though it be penall in some sort oâ—it selâ—e And so it was agreed that if the widdow were not within the words yet she was within the intent and meaning of this Statute The other case was this betwixt Eiston and Stud. Baron and Feme leâ—ied a fine of lâ—nds of the wiues inheritance taking backe an estate in taâ—le the remainder to the right heires of the wife the question was whether the woman after her husbands death might alien without danger of this Statute adiudged that she might because shée was cleare without the intent and meaning of the Act For whatsoeuer the words import the matter that this Statute aimed was and is to restraine women which haue Ioyntures procéeding originally from their husbands or
the husbands Ancestors that they should doe nothing preiudiciall to the heires But in this case there came no Ioynture from the husband but contrariwise the wife had made a Ioynture to her husband and after his decease to bridle the woman to doe what shée listed with her owne inheritance were against all reason and as farre from any affinitie with 11. H. 7. as it should be when a woman seised in Fée simple giues lands to the father of him whom she intends to marrie to the intent that he regrant this land to his sonne and her after marriage with a remainder in taile c. to restraine her when after marriage regranting and death of the husband she should leuie a fine to other vses or suffer a recouerie which case though it be cleane out of the Statute yet it is within the words for the â—oynture was made by the Barons Ancestor though not originally c. And so note those two cases of Plowd one is taken to be within the intent though out of the letter and the other though within the letter yet out of the intent and yet both constructions most reasonable and iust And see Sir George Brownes case Sir Edw. Cokes â— Râ—p that a lease made by a woinaâ— tâ—nant in taâ—le of the gift of her husband c. make a lease for thrée liâ—sâ— that is not warranted by the Statute of 32. H. 8 and although the lease be without clause of Warrantie yet it is within the Statute of 11. H. 7. for those words in the act with warrantie refer to releases and confirmations which makes no discontinuance without warrantie for the inteâ—t of the Act is to proâ—ibit not onely euerie barre but â—ueriâ— manner of discontinuance which puts the heire to his reall action And in that case it was resolued that if the issue in taile had before the womans for feiture granted his remainder onely in that case hee by the exâ—resse letter of the Act shall enter vpon the discontinuance of the woman for his act doth not biâ—de his estate But when the issue in taile leuie a fine with praclamation in the life of the woman tenant in taile c. that shall binde the taile and therefore there the Conusée shall enter for hée which hath the immediate title interest or inheritance at the time of the for feiture shall enter by that Statute And it was said by Anderson Chiefe Iustice of the Common Pleas that where it was inâ—ented for to makâ— euaâ—â—â—ne out of the Statute that if such a woman tenant in taile accepts a fine sur conusans de droit come câ—o c. and by grant and renders the land for a thâ—usand yeares that is an alienâ—tion within the intention of the Act although the words of the Act are discontinuance aliâ—nation c. and of that opinion was Wâ—ay Chiefe Iustice and Dyer and all the Court of Commoâ— Pleas was of the same opinion 18. Eliz. And in Sir Edw. â—okes 3. Rep. Lincolne College case It was resolued that if the heire in taile conuey the lands to others and the woman tenant in taile release or maks conâ—â—râ—nation with waâ—rantie which is not but to perfect and corroborate the estate which the heire in taile hath made such a warrantie is not restrained by the said Act for that which the woman hath done is for the benefit of the heire and not for his preiudice and by his aâ—â—ent And she and the heirâ—â—â—ight haue iâ—yned a fine and so barre the estate taile not with standing the Statute of 11. H. 7. therefore such Acts by the woman shall not be void to grant the hâ—ire or any else any aduantage by the Statute of 11. H. 7. And note the opinion of Sir Edw. Coke in the said case of Lincolne College that the sonne borne after shall by this Statute out the daughter who entred for forfeiture and â—â—ewâ—â— other opinions concurring yâ—â— in Dyer 21. Eliz. 362. the heire in such a case is said to be in by purchass And note Reader that it hath â—â—â—ne adiudged that although the Déed of conueyance and assurance of the womans Ioynture or estate dâ—therpresse her marriage portion as well as her marriage to â—e the cause and consideration of such Ioynâ—urâ— or â—statâ— yet if the estate prâ—â—éds from the husband or his Ancestors she is within the said â—tatute of 11. H. 7. and sâ—e Villers and Beauâ—â—â—ritâ— case 4. Mar. 146. But â—â—â—uâ—râ— if the portion money appeare to be the full price of the land if that differ not the case Sée Sir Edw. Cokes Comment vpon Littleton 365. These â—ases put a man seised in Fee leuie a fine to the vse of himselfe for life and after to the vse of his wife and of the heires males of her body by him begotten and had issue male and after he and his wife leuied a fine and suffered a common recouerie the husband and the wife died and the issue male entred by the Statute of 11. H. 7. and the entrie was â—olden lawfull and yet this caâ—e is out of the letter of the Statute for she neither leuied the fine c. being sale or with any other saue her husband who made the Ioâ—â—ture Sed qui â—aeret iâ— littera â—aeret in cortice and therefore this case being within the 〈◊〉 of the Statute is within the remedy But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that this case was deâ—yed for Law by the Râ—â—â—rder oâ— London in his argument in the case hereunder 〈◊〉 betweene Copland and Pyat Another case in Sir 〈◊〉 Cokes Commentaries vpon Littleton which agrée with Eiston and Studs case in Plowd is A man seised of land â—ure vâ—oris and they two leuie a fine and the 〈◊〉 grant and render the land to the hâ—sband and wife in speciall taile the remainder to the right heires of the wiâ—â— they haue issue the husband dieth the wife taketh another husband and they two leuie a â—â—ne in Fée the issue entreth this is within the letter of the Statute and yet is out of the meaning because the state of the land 〈◊〉 from the wife so as it was the purchase of the husband in letter and not in meaning But where the woman in â—â—nant for life by the gift or conueyance of any other â—â—â— alienation with Warrantie shall binde the heire at this day The case of Copland and Pyaâ— adiudged Hillar 7. Car. in Banâ—â— Regis in effect was thus I. S. his sonne was to marrie to the daughter â—â— I. N. And the Deed 〈◊〉 that I. N. for thâ— consideration of foure hundred 〈◊〉 paid by I. S. and of a marriage c and for the 〈◊〉 of the bloâ—â— of I. N. coâ—enants to stand seised to the vse of the sonne â—â— I. S. and his daughter whom the 〈◊〉 of I. S. should marrie â—â—taile the remainder to another 〈◊〉 of I. N. thâ— remainder to the hâ—ires of I. N. 〈◊〉 dieth hauing issue and the wife alieneth by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was resolued that it was not within
the woman they shal remaine ioyn-tenants of the Franke Tenement and the Inheritance is gone Tailâ— 9. But per Dyer fo 147. and 12. assi p. 22. and 19. assi p. 2. If Tenants in Franke Marriage be diuorced the Woman shall haue all the Land for the Land was giuen for the womans sake and for her aduancement and by Iohn Bracton her husband hath no more in it but Custodiam as he is the wiues tutor and Guardian By the same reason therefore that the wife shall haue the land if she be diuorced by the same I should thinke she should haue it if her Sponsus refuse to marry her But where I giue Land to one to marry my Daughter or if hee marry my Daughter there if hee marry another woman I may enter SECT XXXVI The word Franke Marriage maketh Inheritance IF a man giue lands with his Sister to I. S. in Franke Marriage habendum â—is haeredibus suis in perpetuum By Kniueâ— Mowbray and Finchden 45. Ed. 3. fo 19. this maketh neither Frank Marriage nor estate taile with an expectance of fée as in Case where Lands are giuen expresly in taile habendum eis haeredibus but the fee-simple passeth presently by the gift for Frank Marriage must be holden of the Donor which here hath nothing left in him but all is holden of the Lord Parainount and the words doe not make any other estate taile yet 13. Ed. 1. lands were giuen to one with the Cousin of the Donor in Franke Marriage habendum eis haeredibus and it was taken for good Frank Marriage This saith Brooke was in the yeare that estates taile were made in But for all that if yee look the case in Fitzherbert Formedone 63. whither Brooke sendeth you you shall perceiue that at the time of the gift it was Franke Marriage in fée-simple for by those dayes the Donee had potestatem alienandi post prolem suscitatâ—m But in a gift made after the Statute of quia emptoreâ— on such a fashion I take it the Law will be as before in the case 45. Ed. 3. According as it was also holden in the yeares of H. 8. that if a gift bee made in Franke Marriage the remainder to I. S. in fée this is no good Franke Marriage for warrantie and acquitall that are incident c. bee only in regard of the reuersion to the Donor and they cannot be had when the fée-simple is presently conueyed to a stranger SECT XXXVIII The Accompt of the Degrees LIttl accounts the Degrees from the Donor to the Donees the first Degrée from the Donées to their Issue the second from the Donées Issue to his Issue the third c. and the Issue in the fift Degrée shall doe seruice And this saith he because the Issue of the Donor and the Issue of the Donée after the fourth Degrée past may inter-marrie by holy Churches Law Bracton accompts thus donatarius facit primum gradum haeres suus facit secundum haeres haeredis facit tertium haeres secundi haeredis facit quartum qui tenebitur ad seruitium yea hee maketh it an expresse rule that onely the Donée and two heyres succéeding lineally shall enioy the immunitie of being acquitted And hee seemeth to vnderstand no other reason of the acquitall so long but onely an abstenancie from homage lest the taking of it should hinder a reuerting if it betided the Donée or the Issue to die without Issue Fitzherbert titulo droit 55. and 60. citeth 6 H. 3. and 15. H. 3. in warrant of Bractons Computation which I thinke he fetched not any further then out of the Author himselfe in whom fo 21. I find it And fo 22. hee answereth a doubt of his owne asking that is Whether all other seruice shall follow and continue if homage be done ante terâ—ium haeredem wherein he concludeth that the seruice euer followeth homage quamuis ad damnum soluentium And I conclude whether it be the third heyre or the fourth that shall doe seruice he may still vouch haue a Writ of me ne as if the fourth Degrée were not past and if he bring a Formedone the Writt shall be Dedit in liberum Maritagium SECT XXXIX A Woman giues Lands to one to marry her AS Franke Marriage maketh Inheritance without the words Heyres and is alwayes made to a woman and for her sake so there is another Donatio propâ—er nuptias that is conditionall without words of Condition made euer by a woman to a man That is where a woman giues Land to a man in fee-simple or for tearme of his life to the intent that hee marry her who if hee afterwards when hee is thereto within conuenient time required refuse c. there is now an ordinary Writt for remedy granted in this case to reduce the Land which Writt may be sued in the per cui or post after one or more alienations either by the woman sole or by her and her husband married against such a one as should haue married her after the refusall or after her death by her Heyre whether it bee Sonne or Daughter or Daughters with the child of another and there needs no scripture or writing to proue that the feoffement was for intent of Marriage nay if a woman infeoffe a stranger to the intent to infeoffe her and one which she intendeth to marrie if now the espousals take not effect she may haue Writt causa Matrimonij prelocuti against the stranger though the déed of feoffement were simple and sans Condition an 34. Ed. 3. li. assi and 40. Ed. 3. li. assi a woman enfeoffed one which had a wife and entred for non-performance of the Condition heritance of woman and in this part because it resembleth the Donations that are propter nuptias the Doctrine of it being something like that of Dower SECT XLI Marriage THis Courtesie is in the Inheritance of a Wife therefore a consequent of lawfull Marriage and exceptions of Concubinage or such like which are impediments of Dower must needs be good exceptions here SECT XLII Seisin THere must be in the wife a seisin and possession for if she were but heyre in appearance die before her Ancestor this auaileth her husband nothing Similie If the Father being seised of Lands dye and soone after his Daughter and Heyre dyeth before actuall seisin had by entrie either by the husband wife or other person for them so that no possession and a naked possession in law here is all one yea the law is taken that if a man dwell in Essex with his wife and lands descend to her in Yorkeshire if she die the next day after before entrie the husband shall not bee Tenant by the Courtesie for euen in this case is found a default in him that he did not constitute one to make entrie for him maintenant after the Auncestors death yet if rent descend to a woman Couert c. which dieth before day of payment or after the day and no
seisin the Baron dieth she accepts the rent the may haue a cui in vita by the common Law for the acceptance here maketh not the Lease good because the liuery which the wife made was as seruant to her Master and onely the act of the Baron Par. 41. we haue concerning acceptances some plentifull Learning 21. H. 6. fo 24. Ascu saith there That if Lessée for yeares bee in arrerage of rent and die his Executors shall pay the arrerages if they occupie the Ferme contra if they waiue possession and so if a Lease for life be made to Baron and Feme the Baron commits waste and dies the wife shall be subiect to an action for waste done by the husband if she occupie the land contra if she waiue the possession and by Paston in the end of the case if Baron seised â—ure vxoris make a lease for life of the land and die the wife can haue no action of waste for she was not partie to the lease ex hoc sequitur that a woman vpon acceptance of rent of lease for yeares made by her husband without being her selfe a partie is not bound but shee may enter And albeit the lease were for life yet acceptance barreth not a cui in vita if she were not partie c. 26. H. 8. â—â— 2. per curiam if Baron and Feme sell the Wiues land make feoffement and the Vendée by the Indenture of sale couenants to pay ten pounds annually to the Baron and Feme during their liues if the Baron die and the feme accept the ten pounds this is no bar in cui in vita no more then acceptance of rent after Marriage dissolued where the Baron a per luy made a feoffement or lease But acceptance of rent c. where they both made a feoffement or lease for life is a barre of all actions I will hunt for no farre fetcht learning of acceptances but this I finde if a man lease his land to â— 8. to hold at will by certaine rent none acceptance of the rent here after the Leassors death can barre the Heyre of entrie or make any â—ffirmance of the lease for acceptance can neither make good a lease determined by entry or a lease already void without entry by the lessors death And he that leaseth to hold at will endeth that will when he endeth his life but a lease for yeares by an Abbot or Tenant in taile is not by their death presently void but voydable and the successour or Issue by acceptance of the rent affirmes the Lease So doth the Feme affirme the Lease made for yeares by her husband of her Land by acceptance when she is become sole and sée Dyer 5. Mar. 159. by the opinion of thrée Iustices Dyer Stamford and Browne if Baron and Feme had made a Lease by Indenture rendring rent and the Baron before rent day die and the Feme before the day take another husband who accepts the rent and dies this acceptance shall bind the Wife but note and take with you this peculiar rule where acceptance binds her that she be a partie to the Lease and that by writing for if a man makes a Lease for yeares without déed of land which he holdeth in right of his wife this was méerly void towards the wife so soone as the Husband is dead and acceptance of the rent is to no purpose Plo. 431. per Bromley Againe 9. H. 6. If tenant in Fée iure vxoris make a Lease for yeares and the wife dieth the Lessée shall pay the rent vntill the Wiues heyre enter for so long there is a continuance of a Fermour by force of the Lease but none â—â—owry lyeth for the Husband because he hath no reuersion And an action of trespasse vi armis may be against him but he cannot haue action of debt for the rent But to come home to the very brinke of the Statute nota saith Dyer That the common opinion amongst all Iustices at this day is If Baron and Feme make a Lease for terme of yeares before the Statute of 32. Hen. 8. by Paroll reseruing rent to them both if the wife when shee is become sole accept the rent at the Fermors hands this binds her not from anoyding the Lease if it were not by Indenture for her assent was requisite at the beginning and that ought to haue appeared by déed Dyer 1. Mar. fo 91. The same Learning is 4. Mar. fol. 146. When a Feme Couert departs from her Land the intent consideration and cause ought to be expressed in scripture to proue her consent to the whole Mannor for it is agréed for Law That if before the Statute Baron and Feme had made a Lease by paroll of the Wiues Land for terme of yeares rendring rent though after the Barons death she had accepted the rent yet she might out the Termer because her priuitie to the Lease appeares not per escript likewise if a feme couert suffer a recouery or fine of her Land it shall be intended by Law to be to her owne vse if there appeare none other intent expresly by Writing And none auerment shall be taken of intent or consideration in such Case other then the Indenture specifieth SECT XXV Obseruations vpon the very Statute I Haue shewed what strength a Demise or Lease for yeares made of the Wiues Land by Baron and Feme or by the Baron onely was of before the Statute and is of being made since the Statute without the appointed circumstance and solemnitie Now a little to the very Statute As I said before the ordinance is that Leases shall bee good c. But not directly that any terme shal be boyd though voyd of strength by this Statute they may be many wayes as appeares by the prouiso Note that the forerunning Lease Demise or occupation by Fermors must bee deriued from one that had Inheritance for if at the end of a primitiue Lease made by the Lord of whom the Tenancie is holden or by the Kings grantée or committée of wardship or by tenant in Dower or by Tenant per le Courtesie some of which may by good possibilitie haue had power to make Leases by space of twice twenty yeares a tenant in tayle makes a Lease this succéeding demise hath no vertue or ingredience of the Statute though it séeme to haue good correspondence with it And it is doubted whether a Ferme continued twenty yeares by the Donors demise be sufficient or no to make roome for a new Lease This for ought I perceiue is by a prudent interpretation of the Constitution rather vpon equitie and intent then vpon the Text tenants in fée simple or tailed which transmit their possession to their déere off-spring will not make Leases to any great disaduantage of any of their owne babes or blood and therefore their Leases may well bee â—mitated But like enough it is that Tenant per le courtesie or in Dower or in right of his owne or in
seised 20. Hâ—â— â— The Statute oâ— Moâ—â—on cap. 1. ordeineth concernâ—ng widdowes qâ—â— post moâ—tem vâ—â—oâ—â—â— expeâ—luntur de dotibus suis dores sâ—os vel quaâ—â—â—â—enam habere non possâ—nâ—â—iâ—e placito That whosoeuer shall dâ—force them of Dower â—r â—â—arâ—ntino in any tenemâ—nts whereof their husbands dyed seised if they bee conuiâ—ted de iniâ—â—â—o dâ—forciâ—meâ—to they shall râ—nder dammages to the widdowes so much as the Dower should haue bâ—â—ne worth to them from the time of the husbands death till the day where the widdowes recouer seisen of Dower pâ—r â—udicium Curâ—e And the Deâ—orcers shall â—eâ— in â—iseâ—icordia Regâ—s neuer awâ—it the lesse It is plaine now that the Baron dying sâ—ised if the wife be deforced sâ—e shall recouer dammages which are sometime comprised in the iudgement oâ—seisin and sometime awarded 〈◊〉 iudgemâ—nt â—â—â—â—â—uerâ—â—nt or sâ—râ—â—â—se vt sâ—pâ—â— But for all this Statute of Mâ—â—toâ— de iniusâ—â— deforciamento a widdow shall not in all cases recouer dammages by this dying seiâ—â—d for if the Tenant plead touts temps prist c. and it be confessed or found to haue béene so there iâ— now no fault in him â—â—â— Câ—â—yâ— Hill â—â— Hâ—â— 4. fol. 40. 41â— foreuery hâ—â—re hath right to all the parts of hiâ— since storâ— iâ—heritaâ—â—e â—till the widdow will â—â— indowed The case they say obiected viz. that in a Writ of Coâ—sâ—â—â—â—â— touts â—emps prist will not excuse the Tenant of dâ—â—â—ages is no thing â—like for the Oâ—cuâ—iour there hath not iust â—itlâ— c. Doctor and Student tels vs fol. 82. 8â— that though the husband dieth seised if hiâ— widdow â—oth not deâ—â—â—d Dower sâ—â— shall recouer no daâ—â—ages for it is a gâ—â—â— plea in a Writ of Dower â—â—â—â— the Tenants appeare the first day to say touts tempâ— pâ—ist a yeeldâ—â— Dower if it be deâ—â—â—ded and that plea â—â—all â—xcuse him of dâ—mmages but iâ— he had made refusâ—â—â— he shall bée chargeable as well for dammages before the request as after But in Sir Edward Cokes 4. Rep. 30. b. in Shawes Case a woman recouered Dower by plaint in a Court Baron and shee recouered dammages from the death of her husband because he died seised and it doth not appeare that there was any request and refusall I dare not say that it is Idemius whether the heire or his feoffée plead his plea though I cannot findâ— any presâ—â—ent of dammages giuen vpon it being true but often sur plea de touâ—s temps prâ—st the iudgement ended thus niâ—ilde materia quiâ— venit primo edis vide â—â— Ed. 4. fol. 7. I doe referre the Reader for his better instruction touching this matter where hee shall finde variety of store Sir Edward Cokes Comment vpon Litleton fol. â—2 b. The second Chapter of Merton giues power to all widdowes to make wils as well of Corne growing vpon their dowry lands as vpon their inheritance saluis sâ—ruâ—â—s dominorum de â—eodis quae de doâ—ibâ— aliis tenementis suis debentur Britton séemeth to be taken with a Chancâ—â—y spirit vpon â—ight of this Statute cap. 10â— fol. â—â—0 where he saith that in euery iudgement of seisâ—â— awarded of reasonable Dower there ought to be a â—oreprisâ— or exception de bleâ—â— câ—â—ssaunâ—s femes â—auches I will subioyne Bracton as an Adiutor perhaps more orthâ—doâ— Dower saith he lib. 2 cap. 40 shall â—â— assigned by the heire if he â—e of full age or by the Lord in the heires name if he be vnderage And this within forty dayes after the husbands death for otherwise occurâ—iâ— tempus sequantur damna nisi rationâ—bilis causa excuset This assignation must be made of the land as it was by the husband tilled or vntilled with the fruits growing vpon it allowing nothing to the heire or Executor for manuring husbanding or culture of it for of old time it was obserued that in what â—â—sâ— or plight a woman had receiued her Dower whether it â—â—â—â— tilled or vntilled shee must restore in like plight to the heire c. she might not make her Will of any corne groâ—ing or fruit not sâ—parated from the francktenement Sed nouâ— superueniente gratia sicut pâ—â—et de prouisionibus apud Merton A woman may now ordeine her Testament of corne or fruit growing on her dowry or seuered growing all is one If the husband alien all his lands and the Tenants need not yéeld dower to the widdow as soone as shée demandeth it if there bee iust cause of calling to warranty one or more successiuely till the heire bee vouched And all that time the Tenants are not charged with dammages or cosâ—s But when the heire entreth into warranty if he doe not presently yeeld Dower but stand out â—bstinately hee shall pay dammages as much as dower mâ—ght haue béene worth to the woman from the time of the husbands death to the day wherein shee hath iudgement and the heire shall be amercered In like manner is it if a widdow without any assignation enter into her Dower that was certainly nominated to her ad ostium Ecclesiae and which shee findeth empty at her husbands death if she be eiected or put to suit and delayes she shall recouer dammages So shall shee if shee be eiected the tenement assigned for quarentine during the forty dayes or before dower assigned after the forty dayes So likewise is it if shée haue no place at all assigned to dwell in vbi recliâ—et caput suum c. Thus Bracton and thus long wee haue béene in the Writ de dote nihil vnde habet which though it bee aptliest brought in the common place for the reason aboue declared yet it may bee sued in the County before the Sheriffe per Iusticies as saith Fitzherbert in his na bre 148. But then it séemes it must bée remoued by recordari facias if the Tenant plead ne vnque accouple c. so the booke of Entries 223 224. for in the base Court that issue cannot be tryed SECT XVIII The Writ de recto de dote THere is another Writ called the Writ of right of Dower not because the former Writ hath any â—orciousnesse in it or claimeth vpon wrong title but because this second Writ hath fewest ambages in pleading and the forme of it is vpon pure right Britton saith there are cases wherein a woman is driuen to a Writ of right of dower pleadable in Court One is where a woman hath lost seism of her dower as if shee were disseised and after long peacable seism of the desseisor shee reentred with force if the desseisor recouer against her by assise she hath no remedy but onely by Writ de recto de doâ—e counting of her owne seism Aâ—other is where a woman demands lands or tenements which were her husbands as part of her dower when shee is seised of a surplus or greater part already And the third is when shee demands something as appertenant â—â— hâ—r dower Fitzherbeâ—â— séemes not to allow Bractonâ— relation of vnde nihil
be declared with what immunity a woman shall hold her Dower First Bracton saith Si peculia maâ—iti sufficiant ad solutionem tenentur sed vxori dos sua deonerabitur Et heres defendere dotem warrantizare eam mulieri debet pro ea sequi comitatus hundreda curia dominorum vt viduatae domui suae intendat nutritioni suorum si qui fuerint puerorum If the husbands goods bee not sufficient for payment of his debts the heire must discharge Dower of the burden c. for he is the widdâ—wes warrant of her Dower and ought to follow for her County Court Court léet and hundred c. That shée may sée to her house and nurture of her children Fitzherbert in his Writ of Admeasurement first affirmes that a woman shall not be distreined in her Dower in her Inheritance or in the ioynt purchased lands to her or her husband for her husbands debts The Writ which he sets downe for remedy saith almost as much Râ—x Vicicounti c. cum secundum legem consuetudinem regni angliae mulieres in terris tenementis quae tenâ—nt in dotem de dono virorum vel quae sunt de ipsarum haereditate vel quae sibi quesiuerint pro debitis virorum distringi non debent c. And in some Writs is this Clause Dum tamen haeredes vel Executores testamenti ipsius c. ad debiâ—a illa reddenda nobis sufficiant But it séemes reasonable saith Fitzherbert that a woman shall not hee distreined in her Inheritance for the Kings debts neither in her Dower or Ioynt purchased lands which her husband if her title commenced before her husband became debtor and there is a Writ in the register importing no lesse yea hee affoordâ— it to be good reason that lands purchased by Baron and Feme after the Baron is entred in debt to the King should be discharged in the widdowes hands But let widdowes agrée with the King as well as they can the heire is lyable to the debts of his Ancestor before the widdow The heire likewise dischargeth her of suit and seruice and is so farre forth her warrant that by Britton if shee be impleaded and vouch any other to warranty she forfeiteth her Dower pur sa malice and though her husbands feofee be not called her warrant yet if she be indowed by him shee must hold of him And regularly Tenant in Dower must be Attendant to her husbands heire or to the heires Gardian or to the Gardenis Executor or to him in the reuercion according to the rate of rent whereby they hold ouer if Tenent by fealty and xij d. rent bée disseised and dye his wife being indowed by the disseisor shall be an attendant to the same dissessor of iiij d. annuall And now if the heire will bring a Writ of entry in to quibus against the woman thus indowed shee may shew her speciall matter and that shée is ready to attend to whom the Court will award which shall award that she retaine her Dower still and bee attendant to the heire quaere saith Parkins if the heire haue any other remedy for hee cannot enter vpon the Tenant in Dower D.st 82. a. saith That a Feme tenant in Dower leaueth the reuersion in him against whom shee demands her Dower although he be a disseisor and doth not reduce the reuersion by her recouery to him which hath right as other Tenants for life doe And as it is said in Sir Edward Cokes 8. Rep. 35. in Paynes ca. if she recouer against Tenant for life shee leaueth the reuersion in him But by nat br fol. 265. a. if the King assigne Dower in Chancery as Gardian the reuersion reposeth in the heire for which he shall sue liuery If after iudgement the heire grant his reuersion and the woman atturne she shall be Attendant to the grantée If Lord Meane Tenant be the Tenant holding by iij. d. rent and the Meane by 20. d. If the Tenant marry and the Meane release to him all his right in the tenancy the Tenant dieth the wife must bee endowed according to her husbands best possessions and therefore shall bee Attendant to the heire by a penny and not the third part of twenty pence If hee which holdeth by fealty and xij d. hauing a wife sell the tenancie to his Lord and the estate is executed the Tenants wife shall be indowed sans attendancie for the Seignory extinct is not reuiuable If Lord Measne and Tenant be the Tenant holdeth by xij d. which dieth his wife is endowed shee shall bee attendant to the heire by iiij d. now if the Lord release all his right in the tenancy to the heire the meanalty is extinct and the attendance gone for it was but in respect of the charge which the heire was at to his next Lord. But where there is Lord and Tenant by fealty and xij d. rent if the Tenant make a gift in tayle of the land to hold of him and his heires by xx s. rent c. if the donée dye without issue his wife endowed shall be attendant to the donor by v. s. and viij d. although the Lord release to the donor for his attendance is not in respect of the charge ouer but by a speciall reseruation If there be Seignor Meane and Tenant by fealty and iij. s. rent the Meanes wife after he be foreiudged in a Writ of meane and dead shall be endowed without attendance If Tenant by fealty and xij d. make a gift in taile of the land reâ—â—â—â—ing â—ij d. rent c. and the doâ—ce hauing a wife and issue by her â—iscontinueth in fee and dieth now though the wife recouer Dower and haue execution of it against the discontinues yet she shall not be attendant to him for hâ—s is not chargeable as the Baron was because the Dowers â—uowry resteth of â—ereâ—â—â—â—â— vpon the issue to whom for all that the widdow shall not bee attendâ—â—t till hee haue recontinued the 〈◊〉 resayle quaere tamen saith Perkins If the Tenant whilst hee Itâ—â—â— held of his Lord by fealty and a 〈◊〉 of forty shillings price the Tenants widdow when shée is endowed shall bee attendant by xiiâ— â— iiij â—c 〈◊〉 she tenure were by fealty and a nag without expresse value shée shall bée Attendant by a nag euery third yéere Perkins fo 84. â—â— SECT XXIII Of the cui in vita I Have béene long in Dower and I feare mee some women had rather neuer be endowed that is they had rather die with their husbands or soone after them than bée bound to learne this Catechisme yet I must come to it once againe But first let vssée how lands whereunto a woman may haue right by ancient indowment or by discent or gift in franckmarriage or by some other acquisition before or during Couerture in fee fée tayle for life or for yéeres may bee reduced if the husband haue aliened them for it the possession continued alwayes in the
acsi esset tenens Neither is nul tiel recouery a good plea prima facie saue only for the Demandant when the Tenant pleads a recouery by default 2. Edw. 4. fol. 11. Littleton stands to his old opinion that there was a quod ei deforciat at the Common law and hee would haue it maintainable still by one that hath cause to bring a formedone or an assize or writ of entry sur disseism But the Court séemes to wonder at his sayings and also at the first when Billing comes and demands oier del record for the Tenant in a quod ei deforceat the Court askes him quae intendes per ceo so that with questionâ— of adâ—iration they séeme plainly to reiect both opinions that there is any quod ei deforciat at the Common law giuen otherwise than vpon recouery by default and then the Tenant may plead â—ul tiel record for neither the writ nor the dâ—claration makes any mention of the recouery But Liâ—â—leton comes once more 10. Edw. 4. fol. 2. and 〈◊〉 that once he brought a quod ei deforciat for his mother of lands which shee claimed to hold in Dower the Tenant said there was no record to 〈◊〉 that the 〈◊〉 were lost by default And Littleton challenged the plea because it might be the 〈◊〉 was in a 〈◊〉 Baron by default in a Writ of right in which â—â—â—â— quod â—â— deforcâ—at lyeth and therein iâ— no record 〈◊〉 is a record by default â—he Tenant said there waâ— neither record nor recouery where any 〈◊〉 by default appeared and this was holden a good plea per le◠〈…〉 And Littleton relinquished his suit 44. Edw. 3. fol. 42. A quod ei deforciat was brought against the heire of one which recouered in an assize hee prayed the plea might stay for his non age and vouched to warranty W. N. c. the voucher was allowed but not his age because he might not haue had it in his first Action So that it appeares this writ lyes vpon recouery in assize and the Tenant may vouch But by Thorpe if it had béene the party himselfe which recouered he could not haue vouched Et mirum saith Brooke that vpon a recouery in assize which is by iury and not by default this writ should be And if yée looke this booke at large yée shall finde againe that this writ and the procéeding in it is méerly by the Statute vpon a recouery by default therefore a quod ei deforciat lieth and that vpon a recouery by default in a quod ei deforciat As 13. Edw. 1. a woman recouered in a Writ of Dower by default against Tenant for life of rent and afterward the Tenant which lost by default brought a quod ei deforciat against the woman and she lost by default and then sued a quod ei deforciat c. This is the highest Writ which these particular tenants can haue of their owne possession as it were their writ of right and it lieth against him which is Tenant though he be not party to the recouery as against the feofée of him which recouered But it lyeth seldome or neuer for a stranger to the recouery Yet 41. Edw. 3. fol. 30. the Baron and Feme ioyned in a quod ei deforciat of lands lost by the Feme before marriage bene And by Belknap it lyeth vpon a recouery in a sciri facias and it lyeth without shewing the record The Tenant in this Writ whether it be he which recouered or his alienée shall not haue view 41. Ed. 3. 8. If a man lose by default in a writ of right brought in a Court Baron he may remoue the record and haue a quod ei deforciat in the Common place and quaere saith Fitzherbert if he neuer remoue the record if he then may not sue his quod ei deforciat in which Court hée will either the common place or the Court Baron He agréeth if a woman lose by default and then marrie she and her husband may haue this Writ but if Tenant in tailâ— lose by default and dye his heire must sue a Formedon for that is his Writ of right If lands be giuen to Baron and Feme in especiall taile the remainder to the Baron in generall taile and the wife die sans issue now if the Baron lose by default in a Praecipe quod reddat his writ of Quod ei deforceat must be Quod clamat tenere sibi haeredibus de corpore suo for so soone as the wife died the state apres possibility drowned in the remainder 50. Ed. 3. fol. 4. If in a Scire facias brought in Chancerie by an heire of full age to auoyd indowment assigned in Chancerie whilest he was ward he recouer by default the woman may haue a Quod ei deforceat in Commune Banco So likewise if a man recouer land by default in Scire facias out of some record in the Kings Bench the Tenant which lost by default may sue a Quod ei deforceat in the Common Place If two coparceners tenants in taile lose by default they may ioyne in a Quod ei deforceat yet the default of one is not the default of the other 46. Ed. 3. in Fitzherbert Nat. Breu. Brooke hath it also A Quod ei deforceat brought by two men heires in taile of Gauill kinde Quam clamaâ— sibi tenere haeredibus de corporibus exeuntibus was awarded good though they could haue none issue of their two bodies 46. Ed. 3. 21. If tenant for life or in taile appeare in a Praecipe quod reddat and afterward depart in despite of the Court he shall lose the land but yet he may recouer by Quod ei deforceat for the recouerie is by default for that he doth not appeare when he is demanded But if tenant for life or in taile after the mise ioyned in writ of right depart in despite of the Court they shall lose the land and not haue a Quod ei deforceat for the Iudgement is finall If Baron and Feme seised in droit le feme for her life lose by default in a Praecipe quod reddat they may haue a Quod ei deforceat by Fitzherbert which is denied in the old Nat. Breu. 155. If tenant for life lose by a default in a Câ—ssauit he shall haue a Quod ei deforceat by this Statute of West 2. If â—e in reuersion vpon default of tenant for life pray to bée receiued plead and lose by action tried yet the tenant for life may haue a Quod ei deforceat for the Iudgement must be against him by his default If in a Praecipe quod reddat the Tenant vouch and the â—ouchee will not appeare so that the Tenant loseth by default of the Vouchée Fitzherbert makes it a question whether hee may haue a Quod ei deforceat or no because the Iudgement is not giuen vpon the tenants owne default But cléere it is if the Vouchée appeare enter into Warrantie and lose
may be conveyed from him to her 123. where hee shall be charged for her debt 136. what Acts she may doe and what not 141. How they shall bring actions 196. 197. 204. Impediments of Marriage by affinity 59. by adoption c. 60. Infant what acts voyd and what voydable 132. Ioynture 183. where both it and Dower shall be had 192. what shall be said to be a refusall or agreement to a Ioynture 195. Law reduced to a Method 1. of King Edmond 375. Marriage what 51. Promises thereof defined and distinguished 52. 53. How long such Promises are to be expected 55. who may and who may not contract Matrimonie 57. Impediments thereof 59. 60. why it's necessary 63. when it's consummate 63. Not dissolved for any crime 67. Statutes concerning it 68. 69. Lands given to marry one when recoverable when not 78. It changes the Womans name and dignitie 125. Nuper Obijt where it lyeth 27. Out-larie of Baron and Feme 221. Partners what 24. difference between them and Ioynt-tenants and tenants in Common 25. the coherence between them 45. where they shall be heire one to the other and where not 46. where they shall contribute 47. where they differ in service 49. Pardon of the King 364. Partition of the manner thereof 31. where a Writ lyeth 33. what plea in that writ is good 34. who may sue it 35. In what case it shall abate 38. The Iudgement upon that Writt 39. what things shall not be parted 40. Where it may not be avoyded 42. 43. where it may 44. Polygamie forbidden 61. Posthumus where he may enter 14. where not 15. Promises of Marriage how long to be expected 55. How they may bee dissolved 55. and by what authority 56. Quarentine what 242. Rape 376. of two sorts 377. Recoveries what 180. Remitter what and when 157. Rent reserved upon a gift in Frank-marriage is voyd 73. a Woman dowable of Rent 109. Seisin to make Tenant by the Courtesie 8. and the Wife dowable 93. Service of Parteners where it differeth 49. Statutes concerning Marriage 68. 69. of Gloucester 160. of 32. H. 8. cap. 28. 163. that Stat. expounded 166. 170. 173. of 27. H. 8. cap. 10. 183. Of 11. H. 7. cap. 20. Of 3. H. 7 cap. 1. Of West 2. cap. 12. Of West 1. cap. 14. West 2. cap. 35. Of 6. Rich. 2. cap. 6. Of 31. H. 6. cap. 9. Of 3. H. 7. cap. 2. Tayle speciall 85. Treason 208. Wast 307. Wooing 71. when the gifts shall be restored if the match take not effect 72. Women why in subjection 6. their severall ages 7. when compellable to serve 8. Writs whereby a woman may have her Land 23. of nuper obijt 27. de rationabili parte 30. of partition 33. The end of the TABLE THE WOMANS LAWIER SECT I. ALl Law saith Iustinian in his Imperiall institutions belongeth to persons to things or to actions which division I acknowledge to bee good and so in his method of the Civil Law doth a Doctor and very learned man Conradus Lagus yet the same Lagus saith it is too strait for his purpose and therefore not féeling himselfe at ease in so narrow a distribution to drive the formes of Civill Law to certaine heads according to their materiall varieties hée confesseth hée iâ— compelled to constitute a pluralitie of Law members more then the very Law setteth down as appeareth in the 2. Part of his Method the 2. Chapter yet a curious Caviler I perceive might find in Iustinians partition a very great redâ—â—dance rather then any defect for Res is a transcendente comprehending actions persons and what not And actions in the widest signification séeme alone to bée the theame and right subject matter of Lawes and all Humane Constitutions as for persons they are so many and so differing that I thinke there is no use Custome Injunction or decrée but it appertaineth to some person and that in some peculiarity of difference either in state age sex function profession merit or some other like severall regard so that in mine opinion Law might bée dispersed into apt titles of this personall difference in such sort as both Students might come to the easier knowledge the one of their learning generall and the other of their particular duty I though I bée farre unable to produce a perfect method of the Lawes of England as Lagus following his owne artificial project hath framed an excellent Deliniation of the Lawes of Rome and though I bée unworthy to have the Marshalling of the titles of Lawe to bring all matter cohering under them yet I will make a little assay what I am able to doe if I were put to it in a popular kind of instruction following a frame by distinction of persons chasing the primary distribution of them made before the World was seven daies old Masculum Foeminam fecit eoâ— of which division because the part that wée say hath least judgement and discretion to bée a Law unto it selfe Women onely Women they have nothing to do in constituting Lawes or consenting to them in interpreting of Lawes or in hearing them interpreted at lectures leets or charges and yet they stand strictly tyed to mens establishments little or nothing excused by ignorance mée thinkes it were pitty and impiety any longer to hold from them such Customes Lawes and Statutes as are in a maner proper or principally belonging unto them Laying aside therefore these titles which include onely the masculine as Bishop Abbot Prior Monke Deane and Chapter Viscount Coroner together with those which bée common to both kinds as Hereticke Traitour Homicide Felon Laron Paricide Cutpurse Rogue with Feoffor Feoffée Donor Donée Vendor Vendée Recognisor Recognisée c. I will in this Treaty with as little tediousnesse as I can handle that part of the English Lawe which containeth the immunities advantages interests and duties of women not regarding so much to satisfie the déep learned or searchers for subtility as woman kind to whom I am a thankfull debter by nature SECT II. The Creation of Man and Woman GOd the first day when hée created the World made the matter of it separating light from darkenesse the second day hée placed the Firmament which hée called Heaven betwixt the waters above the Firmament and the waters under the Firmament the third day hée segregated the waters under the Firmament into one place calling the waters Seas and the dry land Earth which hée commanded to bring forth â—ructifying herbes plants and trees the fourth day hée made the Sun the Moone and the Stares in the Firmament to bée for Signes Seasons Daies and Yeres and to give light upon the earth the fift day he made by his Word the Fishes of the Sea Whales and every fethered foule of the ayre commanding them to increase the sixt day he made Cattle créeping things the beasts of the Earth and now having made all things that should be néedfull for them hée created Man Male and Female made he them Bidding them
this proportion by a Statute made 25. Ed. 3. and for this aide every Lord may either distraine or bring his writ de auxilio habendo at his election but tenant by grand serjeanty or petit shall not pay this aide Mich. 21. He. 4. fol. 32. no more shall coppy-holders as séemeth by the writ both in Fitzherbert and Bracton for it is Precipimus ut habere facias rationabile auxilium de Militibus et liberetenentibus Now if the Kings writ runne for it before the Statute how is it that Bracton saith it was due but de gratis That perhaps he meant but for the quantity ipse videriâ— if the father dye the daughter being unmarried shee shall recover so much as was gathered and not paied her at the hands of the executor or heire but this aide is onely for the marriage of the eldest daughter and not for no daughter where many make but one heire But sée Bracton fol. 36. b. Where he saith primae genitae filiae non dabitur auxilium tale quia istud auxilium pertinet ad Cap. dom sicut pertineret si non esset nisi unus haeres cum omnes sunt quasi unus hâ—eres SECT V. A Woman compellable to serve THe next age of a Woman is 9. yeares when shee is dowable but wee will stay a while with the virgins concerning whom if they be in the power and governance of parents masters or prochein amies or if they bee poore the Law differeth little or not much from the common forme apperteyning unto males unlesse it been in cases of rape which I reserve to the end of my discourse where the poore have least need of subsidie onely this I observe here By a Statute made 5. Eliz. ca. 4. Two Iustices of peace in the Countrie or the head officer and 2. Burgesses in Cities c. may appoint any woman of the age of twelue yeares and under 40. being unmaried and out of service to serve and bee retained by yeare weeke or day in such sort and for such wages as they shall thinke méet and if she refuse they may commit her to prison till she shall be bound to serve SECT VI. Of Heires BVt leaving this sort to the title of day laborers come we to women wards in the custody of their lords And take for the foundation here the Statute it selfe West 1. Cap. 22. This Statute expresly reciting the materiall point of the Statute of Merton willeth it in every of them to be observed Merton Cap. 6. and the Statute of Merton is this Whosoever lay person shall bee convicted bee hee parent or other to have detained abduced or married puerum aliquem he shall yéeld the value of the marriage and be imprisoned untill yee have both made amends to the partie damnified if the ward bee married and satisfaction to the King for the transgression hoc de haerede infra 14. c. but if any heire of 14. yeares age or upward till 21. shall marry himselfe without gréeing with his Lord to defraud him of the marriage where the Lord offered him a convenient marriage and without disparagement there it shall be lawfull to hold the inheritance untill and after the full age of 21. yeares by so long time as shall suffice to reape and receive the double value of the marriage secundum est inationem legalium hominum et secundum quod pâ—oeodem maritagio prius fuerit oblatum sine fraude malitia et secundum quod probare poterit in Curia Dm. Regis Let us speake of heires and see a litle in what cases a woman shall inherit It is knowne to all that because women lose the name of their ancestors and by marriage usually they are transferred in alienam familiam they participate seldome in heireship with males and therefore Bracton is bold to say Nunquam ad successionem vocatur femina quaÌ„diu haeres superfuerit ex masculis but to this rule he subjoyneth exception and examples the very same which are in Littleton To wit exception of right line right bloud and maner of giving SECT VII Of the right Line A Female may be preferred in succession before a male by the time wherein she commeth as a daughter or daughters daughter in the right line is preferred before a brother in the transversall line and that aswell in the common generall taile as in fee simple for example land is given to a man and to the heires of his body who dyeth having issue two sonnes of which the eldest dieth leaving issue a daughter this daughter shall inherit by the right of blood also a woman shall bee preferred propter jus sanguinis Example a man hath issue a sonne and a daughter by one venter and a sonne by another venter the first sonne purchaseth in fee and dieth without issue the sister shall inherit So it is where a man seised in fee hath issue ut supra and dieth his eldest sonne entereth and dieth without issue c. Bracton who hath both these cases disputeth here as if he were seeking a knot in a bulrush and he findeth a difference where the inheritance is Discendens and Perquisita But Littleton is plaine though the second sonne bee heire to the father in the last case and therfore should have had the land had the eldest sonne neuer entered yet the case being as it is possessio fratris de feodo simplici facit sororem de integro sanguine esse heredem whether the fee was descended or perquisit what skils it here it must needs be if the brother was heire of the blood of the first purchasor that the sister of the whole blood is so too yet there is a great difference betweene land purchased by him that died seised and land discended unto him for the first may goe to the heire on the fathers side for default of such to the heire of the mothers side but land discended must alwaies goe to heires of the blood of the first purchaser and the case may bee such that a female shall cary away inheritance from a male though there be no difference of right line or in the integrity of blood which Bracton calleth jus sanguinis duplicatum as where Iohn Stile purchaseth in fee dieth without issue an ant or ants or uncles daughter on the father side shal inherite before an uncle or uncles sonne on the mothers side where they be both collaterall and the integrity or neernes of blood is alike Put case that the purchasor died leaving issue only Iohn the younger and this Iohn married or unmarried dieth without issue now cannot the land goe to the heires on the part only of the mother of young Iohn and therefore ye must ascend a step higher to the marriage of the father and mother of the first purchasor if ye will finde who shall inherit where if there be neither brother nor sister to the purchasor a daughter to the eldest uncle on the fathers side may inherite before any of the
mothers side yea and before a sonne of the second uncle on the part of the father and this by the worthinesse of blood I will not examine the crainkes of discent but turne to the case where possession of the brother excludeth a brother and taketh in a sister If a man hath issue a sonne and daughter by one venter and a sonne by another and give land to the eldest sonne in taile now if the father die and the reversion in fée discend to the eldest sonne who likewise dies without issue of his body the second sonne shall have this land For here was no possession but an expectance of fée simple in the eldest Per omnes Iusticiarios de Communi Banco 24 E. 3. fol. 13. For it is possessio fratris non reversio fratris c. Yet Thorpe Iustice of the Kings Bench thought the land should goe to the daughter Brooke con Brooke discent 13. Againe afine was levied to I. and A. his wife in taile the remainder in fée to A. they had issue a sonne and the husband died the wife tooke another husband by whom shee had issue another sonne and died the eldest sonne entered and died without issue the collaterall heire to him entered as into the remainder in fée and the youngest sonne of the halfe blood to execute the fée brought a Scire facias which was holden good for though the eldest might have charged forâ—ited or given the fée simple by atteinder yet it was not actually in him and therefore the demi sanke none impediment but the younger sonne might have it as heire to his mother 24. E. 3. fol. 30. Which cases prove that the possession of a brother to convey the fee to a collaterall heire if it be not apprehendeth actively the generall heire to the common ancestor may enter Therefore where there is a son or daughter by one venter and a puisne sonne by an other venter if the father die seised of an advouson or a rent and the eldest son died before he present or receive the rent the daughter shall not inherit and if the father die seised of an use in fee possessio fratris facit sororem esse haeredem by taking the profits of the ground 5. E. 4. 7. Where it is said that if the father by testameÌ„t bequeath the profits for tearme of yeares this letteth not the possession of the eldest brother otherwise it is if it had beene for tearme of life and the like difference is by this booke if a lease be made for yeares or for life of lands not in use c. SECT VIII Where the manner of gift altereth the discent BRactons first exception to his general rule that a Woman shall not inherit when there is an heire male is Nisi contrarium faciat modus donationis His example is A man giveth land to one in mariage with his daughter to them two and to the heires of their bodies they have issue a daughter and the husband dying the wife taking another husband hath by him a sonne and dieth the daughter shall inherit per modum donationis the case is plaine But Littleton hath a limitation where modus donationis doth cleane exclude Women from inheriting That is where lands are given to a man the heires male of his body now if he die having issue a sonne and a daughter by one wife and a second sonne by a second wife the daughter can never inherit nay if he die having issue a daughter onely which daughter hath a sonne neither daughter nor son shall inherit for whosoeuer shall inherit by force of an intaile made to heires males must per modum donationis be males coÌ„vey his disceÌ„t to it per heirs males which because the sonne cannot doe here the donor may reenter But Littleton saith also lest women should take the matter unkindly at his hand that where land is given to a man to the heires females of his body his issue female shal inherit per formaÌ„ doni not the issue male for the will of the giver must be observed He hath another case which I may not omit When lands are given a man to the heires males of his body which have issue 2. sonnes the eldest dyes having issue a daughter if hée lease the land for tearme of yeares the reversion descendeth to the sonne but if the lease bée for tearme of life of the lessée the reversion and the fée simple descendeth to the daughter the discontinuance is the cause here the daughter is in not in the per but contra modum donationis by violating the will of the giver SECT IX Where a woman comming to lands shall retaine them c. NOw I will shew you where a female having gotten inheritance per modum donationis or otherwise shall retaine it and where not Marke well this case Iohn died seised of fée leaving issue Robert the eldest sonne and Richard the puisne Robert entred tooke a wife and had issue Alice which Alice died hée tooke another and leaving her great with childe hée died the Lord seized the land and ward of Alice and granted the custody to one which indowed the wife of Robert she was delivered of a sonne William The Lord seized William his ward which lived ten yeares and died without issue Henry the sonne of Richard the second sonne of Iohn entereth Alice entereth upon Henry and hée brings an assise now because the possession of the Lord was seisin and possession of William to whom Alice was but of the halfe blood it was awarded that Henry should recover But by the opinion of the Court the land which the wife held in dowre should goe to Alice for therein William had Broke dispent pl. 19. no more but a reversion 8. Assisa pl. 6. Againe Henry seised of tenements deviseable in Winchester where the Custome is that hée which is seised by devise may not with warranty or without warranty make alienation to barre the reversion or remainder deviseth them to his wife Alice for tearme of life the remainder to Th. his sonne for life so that Th. should make no alienation quo minus tenementa devenirent propinquioribus haeredibus de sanguine puerorum post mortem predicti Thom. Henry died having issue Steven an elder sonne and Maud a daughter which had issue Eliz. Steven died without issue Alice the wife entered and died seised Tho. entereth and alieneth in fée with warranty Maâ—d dieth Elizabeth maketh claime by taking the haspe of the doore in her hand Tho. dieth without issue Eliz. entereth upon the alienee he puteth her out shée bringeth an assise It was holden that the heires of Henry had nothing in the fée simple by the limitation which went not to his children but to the next of blood to his children excluding ses infants demesne And by Wilby if B. make a lease to Alice for life the remainder to the néerest of blood if he die having issue 2. sonnes and the
it selfe should be deliuered to a Lay-man altogether vnlettered which should distribute to euery coheyre her part at aduenture wherwith she should stand contented But this might be otherwise by their agréement amongst themselues to elect according to the prerogatiue of their age Bracton discendeth déeper into examination what things may be parted amongst coheyres exempting neither lands tenements homages villinages seruices seruitudes or anything belonging to lands and tenements from diuision vnlesse it be seriantia quae diuidi non debent ne cogatur-Rex seruitium accipere per particulas or a castle or the head of some Earldome or Barrony quod propter ius gladij diuidinon debet sit illud castrum vel aliud edificium hoc ideo saith he ne sic caput perplures particulas diuidatur plura iura comitatus Baroniarum deueniunt ad per nihilum quod deficiat regnum quod ex comitatibus Baronijs dicitur esse constitutum Therfore Caput comitatus vel Baroniae resteth indiuisible and shall go to the eldest copartner though where there are many chiefe and great Mansion-houses euery one may haue one perhaps and if there be but one euery one may haue part thereof where the frank-tenement is holden by seruice militarie for if a frée soke-man die whose heritage it is ab antiquo partibilis the eldest son by Bracton shall haue his house and the rest shall haue allowance Amongst other things Bracton standeth long vpon the bringing to a common heape which we call Hotchpot Lands giuen in marriage to a coheyre shewing that though lands giuen in marriage whether the Inheritance be discendens or perquisita and whether shee to whom the land is giuen be at the time of the gift a maid or a widow must needs fall into partition when part of the other lands is claimed hoc quamuis homagium interuenerit post tertium haeredem yet for all that she to whom there is giuen in marriage already more then an euen portion may well retaine it and is not compellable to any confusion vnlesse she demand a share in that which remaineth so that she to whom all is giuen may likewise retaine all And where a daughter was infeoffed pro homagio seruitio or where a stranger was infeoffed of part of the inheritance which afterwards married a daughter c. they might be made parcell of the other lands without any Hotch-pott of these things ye may read more in Bract. li. 2. c. 33 and 34 with a Writt of habere facias seisinam for he saith possessio non pertinet ad haeredes nisi naturaliter fuerit apprehensa animo et corpore proprio vel alieno sicut procreatorio prius ad ipsos non pertinebit vnde cum in curia Regis facta fuerit partitio statim habeanâ— breue de seisma sua habenda SECT XX. of Hotch pott according to Littleton FOr putting of lands in Hotch-pot there is no where so full and plaine learning as in M. Littl. third booke c. z. If saith he a man seised in fée-simple lands hauing issue two daughters of which the eldest is married giue parcell of those lands to his daughter and her husband in franke-marriage and die seised of other lands excéeding in value those which are giuen c. the husband and wife shall haue no part of this remnant vnlesse they will put the land giuen vnto them in Hotch-pot for example If the father had 30. acres and gaue 10. now after his decease if the donées refuse to make commixtion the other daughter may enter and occupie the whole 20. and hold it to her selfe But putting all in Hotch-pott to finde the intire value for it is but an estimation or valuation finding the acres to bee of like goodnesse the Donées in franke-marriage shall haue an nâ—reasement of 5. acres to hold all 15. in seueraltie so that alwayes the land giuen in frank marriage must remaine to the donées and their heyres for else saith Littleton should follow a thing vnreasonable and inconuenient which alwayes the Law detesteth there is the same Lawes betwixt the heyres of Donées in frank marriage and the other partners if the Donées themselues die before their ancestor or before partition This putting of Land in hotchpot is where the other lands descend from the Donor onely and not from any other auncestor for if they descend from the father or brother of the donour from the mother of the Donée that which is equallie so discended shall be without Commixtion equally diuided Also by Littleton if the land descended be of equall valew with the land giuen in franke Marriage Hotchpot should be then in vaine and to no purpose and sée Littl. Chapter of parceners more concerning such Hotchpot How partition may be auoyded PArtition made betwixt two Sisters tenants in fée simple they both being of full age is not defesable though there want oweltie and equall valew in their parts But if the land were in fée-taile the parties making the partition should bee bound and concluded onely for their time the issue of her which had the meaner value might enter after her mothers death into her Aunts part and occupie with her in common and she againe with her niece in the part alotted to her Sister If two Coparceners in fée both married together with their husbands make partition it shall stand in force during the coverture but after the death of a husband his wife hauing a meaner part may enter and defeat the partition not so if at the time of the alotment the parts were both of equall annuall valew If two Coparceners whereof the one is vnder 21. yeares age make partition so that a meaner valew is allotted to the puisne partner she may enter and defeat the partition either in her minoritie or when she is of full age but let her take héed when shée commeth once to full age that shée take not the whole profit of that which to her selfe was alotted for that is an agréement to the partition and maketh it indefeasable peraduenture a moietie of the profits she may take Thrée acres of land are giuen to one in taile which hath other thrée in fée and after his death his two daughters make partition so that one hath the land intailed and another the land in fée if shée which hath the fée-simple alien her part and die her issue may enter into the land tailed and hold occupation in Common with her Aunt whose folly was to make such a partition for since shee is without remedie against the alienée of her mother and without recompence for the lands intailed whereunto she is an heyre by descent from the first Donée it is reason she may enter specially considering that the state taile is not discontinued yet 20. Hen. 6. it is holden that she is put to her Formedon A man seised of two carues of land one by iust title another by disseisin of an infant dieth seised hauing issue two daughters they diuide
so that one hath the carue gotten by disseisin the infant entereth vpon her possession c. she may enter into the other carue and hold in parcenarie with her Sister But if shee had aliened her part in fee before the entrie of the infant this had beene a full dismission of her selfe out of Copartnership which she could not haue recontinued by entrie as she might perhaps had she made onely a lease for yeares generally if after partition one part be euicted from her which hath it by loyall entrie she may enter into the other lands and occupie with the other Coparceners compelling them to a new diuision all this saith Littleton SECT XXI How Partition shall bee auoided when it is by Iudgement MUch of that which Littl. hath taught for the auoyding of partition as I collect must bee vnderstood of partition in pais and by agréement for when it is made by Iudgement in a Writ of rationabile parte nuper obijt or assise to hold in seueralty or by liuery in the Chancery or else by Writt de partitione in which cases there is commission or authority deriued from the Prince to extend and to make partes by the Oath of 12. men c. there is now no reason that a matter of this substance circumstance and solemnity should be all layd on the ground by a bare entrie yet that silly poore women altogether ignorant of the law might not feare that that Partition which is made by the Law that by law there were no meanes to reuerse it but that still it must stand impugnable whatsoeuer iniquitie or inequality it had Old Breton saith in the end of his 17. Chapter Si ascum â—ercener soit que se tient nient paie de cel partison si ferres nous vener le process le record deuant nostre iustices de banke c. illonques soient les errors redresse c. He concludeth somewhat like Bracton Et apres le Assignement des purparties fuit per sort ou per election foit le seisin per iudgement de nostre court But to the matter There is occurring in many of the yeare bookes remedies against partitions as if iudgement be giuen in a nuper obijt of purpartie and seisin granted to hold seuerally yet the partition may be anoyded by error in the first iudgement If partition bee made in Chancerie and a lesse value then is due alotted to a puisne Sister which remaineth still in ward she may haue remedy by scire facias when shee commeth to full age So whether partition be of it selfe altogether vniust or in part inequall through malice ignorance or negligence of the Sheriffe or extenders there is remedie alwayes so the parties be not hurtfull to themselues And although partners of estate in fée being all of full age making purpart by agréement bind conclude themselues and their heyres for euer yet when partition is compulsatorie and the parts are deliuered by the Sheriffe who with his extenders maketh diuision which may be without the presence of the heyres I sée no great reason here why acceptance should be a barre in the issue perpetuall or to the parceners for terme of life yet Littletons bien for garde is good counsell vide Dyer 33. H. 8. 52. SECT XXII Of the coherence betweene Partners after diuision BUt admit now that partition is so made that there remaineth neither cause nor intention to vndoe it yet the partners are in a kinde of confederacie and combination amongst themselues by the very Law and custome of this Realme Et louâ— droit est cy connex nul de eux ne doit respondre sans le autre pur le contribution Etsi ascun se face ceo ne serroit in preiudiâ—â— des auters partners Britton cap. 73. so that if any of them will sue for any inheritance that was their Common Ancestors the suit must be in all their names still and if any of them be sued for any such Land or inheritance she may pray ayde of the other coheires which may come with her to pleade a feoffment fine or release or deraigne warrantie and if in this sort she lose some or all her part she shall recouer that which her partners hold her equall portion But if a parcener put her selfe in defence and will not pray ayde of her fellowes which may strengthen and assist her she shall then recouer nothing against her coheyres though she lose all her purpart and liuelihood They continue therefore still in a sort one heyre tyed together like bundles of rods for their mutuall strength and by Bracton and Britton if one of them die without issue after partition her part shall goe to the rest per ius accrescendi But is crossed by Littleton aboue which telleth you that their title shall be in this case by discent though the dying be before partition therefore if partition be betwixt two Sisters of the halfe bloud and one of them dyeth without issue hauing an vncle of the whole blood to the Father that Vncle by Bractons partition shall haue her Inheritance c. SECT XXIII By what manner of acquisition the ouer-liuer taketh the part of a Co-heire when she dyeth FOr your better instruction in this point marke this Case a man hath issue thrée daughters by one venter and one daughter by another venter and dyeth soised c. they all enter and two of the daughters by the first venter die the third daughter by the same venter shall be heyre alone to their two parts and the fourth daughter of the halfe blood getteth therein nothing 10. Assi p. 27. yet 4. Assi p. 10. if a man die seised hauing issue two daughters by diuers venters both vnder age and a stranger abateth and one of these daughters in their infancie releaseth all her right and dyeth without issue the other may haue a mortdancestor and recouer the whole Inheritance as heire to her Father though she can by no meanes be heyre to her Sister But if she which released had beene of full age when shée released she had giuen away her moitie And if shée had entered at full age or vnder age nothing had accrewed to her Sister But not entring the mortdancestor to which they were both intituled goeth for all to the suruiuor And this I thinke to be a good case making nothing on Bractons side and not plaine any thing on Littletons SECT XXIIII Of Contribution THat which Britton toucheth aboue of Contribution I vnderstand to be in case where one partner prayeth ayde of another the sequell whereof I haue shortly told you There is another Contribution by Statute Marlebridge c. 9. which willeth Sâ— haereditas alâ—qua de qua vnica tantum secta debeatur ad plures parâ—icipes eiusdem haeredit devoluatur ille qui habet eineciam partem vnicam sacier sectam participes pro portione sua contribuant The writ for this Contribution when the young copartners will not performe the
demand made of the rent by her husband hee shall haue Courtesie in the rent notwithstanding So it is if an Advouson in grosse descend to a woman married hauing Issue c. though she die afore auoydance the husband shall present and though the Bishop after the descent present by lapse yet the husband shall haue the second presentment for there cannot in these things possession be taken maintenant and at all times as they be in Lands And take with you here these Cases out of Dier 1. Ma. fo 95. Tenant per Cheualrie in cap. dieth his Daughter and Heyre being vnder age office is found and the King grants the wardship of body and Land to me which marrieth the ward and hath Issue by her and after shee accomplisheth the age of sixetéene yeares and the King is satisfied for the two yeares profit they tender a generall liuerie and before it be past the Wife dieth the Baron shall haue the Courtesie come semble saith the Booke And 6. Eliz. Dier 229. the like descent is to a Daughter and married hauing Issue by her husband and she dieth ten dayes after her Father no Liuery being sued that is found by office the Baron shal be Tenant by the Courtesie and shall sue liuery SECT XLIII No Courtesie of reuersion after estate for life THe seisin must be to the Wife in estate of Inheritance not mangled or cut off from the Frank Tenement and therefore by Parkins where a Woman an Heyre enters after her Fathers death and being seised in fée-simple makes a Lease of her Land to I. S. for terme of his life if she now marry haue Issue and die during the Lease the Husband shall neither be Tenant by the Courtesie of the Land when it reuerts nor of the rents in the meane while Also 8. assi p. 6. If a Daughter and Heyre enter endolâ— den and haue Issue by her and the condition being broken she dyeth if now the Feoffor enter the Feoffée shall not be Tenant per le Curâ—esie of the Seignorie But if a feme sole haue a rent or common in or out of certaine Lands and the Tenant leasseth the Land to a stranger during the life of I. S. and the woman intermarrieth with the Lessée hath Issue and I. S. dyeth now if the wife die the Baron shall haue Courtesie in the rent or Common And if the Tenant leased his ground for 20. yeares and a woman hauing in the ground a rent charge in fée intermarrieth with the Lessée c. dieth during the terme it is a question in Parkins whether the husband shall haue Courtesie in the rent after the terme determine see Parkins cap. By the Courtesie SECT XLVII No Courtesie of a bare vse IF a Woman sole seised c. make a feoffement to the vse of her selfe her heyres and then she marrieth hath Issue and dieth before any estate in the same lands be againe by entry or otherwise executed to her her husband shall not be Tenant by the Courtesie and this aswell after the Statute of 27. H. 8. as before if the Feoffement were since the Statute SECT XLVIII What Husband may be Tenant by the Courtesie and of what estate WHere the Wise is actually seised of Lands in â—éesimple see-taile generall or as Heyre of sée-taile speciall the second Baron may bee Tenant by the Courtesie as well as the first for so is the Maxime And Parkins Fitzherbert and Brooke haue all of them the Case 21. H. 3. viz. A woman Inheritour hath Issue by her Husband and he dieth she takes another Husband hath Issue by him and that Issue dieth the woman dieth her second Husband shall be Tenant by the Courtesie Bracton agréeth also who when hee hath shewed this Ciuilitie of England concludeth Quod dicitur de primo diâ—i poterit de secundo siue de primo viro haeredes apparentes extiterunt siue non plenae aetatis vel minoris But hee addeth Quod iniuriosum est secundum Sâ—ephanum de Segraue qui dicebat quod lex illâ— male â—uit intellecta male vsâ—tata Nam quod dicitur de lege Angliae intelligi debet de primo virâ— communibus haeredibus non de secundo maxime cum haeredes apparentes extiterint de primo My mind giues mee that hee said truth and that Law turning a little out of her Channell here before Iustice Segraues time could neuer since bee brought to her course SECT XLIX Of speciall Taile BEfore West 2. cap. 1. all the Estates which wée now call tailed that is curtailed or cut off were sée-simple Conditionall If Lands had béene giuen to a man and a woman in Franke Marriage or to them and to the Heyres of their two bodies which gifts make now a speciall Taile as soone as they had Issue the Condition was thought to be performed And as a woman suruiuing her first Husband in this case might alien the Land so might she by bearing a Childe to her second Husband c. this makes him Tenant by the Courtesie be inforced to proue that the Childe sent forth some voyce or cry arguing life and naturall humanity for if it bellowed bleated brayed grunted rored or howled there accrued no courtesie by getting such an vnciuill vrchin By him therefore there must be a naturall crie heard inter quatuor parietes for he saith though a Child be borne mutus surdus tamen clamorem emittere debet sive masculus sit siue foemina nam Dicunt E. vel A. quotquot nascuntur ab Eâ—a E. or A. all crye that from Eue come Though they be borne both deafe and dumbe Non sufficit igitur tantum baptizatus scpultura yâ—t 28. H. 8. Dyer fol. 25. sets downe Fitzherberts opinion that a man may be Tenant by the Courtesie though the Childe neuer crie car paraduenture lissue soit nee dumbe And so saith Parkins 9. 4. 7. viz. that if the issue bee borne aliue though it die before it be heard crie or before it be baptized for that is a matter also with Bracton if there were no lachesse contumacie or contempt in the Baron he may be Tenant by the Courtesie But by negligence or by contempt he shall preiudice himselfe ascuns diont SECT LI. A Childe borne beginneth the title of Courtesie NOw this hauing a Childe is such a matter as it séemeth that maine tenant thereupon the title of Courtesie beginneth for example if a bond woman purchase Land and marrie if the Lord enter before Issue be had no Childe borne afterwards shall make the husband tenant by the Courtesie But if the Baron haue Issue by his wife before the Lords entrie he shall be tenant by the Courtesie and the auourie from that time forward shall rest vpon him solement And the possession in Law if the wife die shall not light vpon the Heyre but vpon the Baron which shall be tenant to euery praecipe Câ—o est cleere lei Brooke out of the Doctor and Student vide Brooke
woman may haue Dower by taking his seruice euery third day and if a mill by taking the third part of the profit and shee shall grinde tole-frée and if a House a woman is Dowable by a Chamber or rent assigned out of the house Note that if such a rent be assigned out of the Land wherein Dower is claimed the woman may haue Assise without Déed contra if it be assigned out of other Land 33. H. 6. fo 2. Also a woman may hold an Aduousan appendent in Dower of the third part of an Aduousan in gros by presenting at euery third auoydance or the third part of the moitie of an Aduousan by presenting at euery sixt auoydance And of a Common in grâ—s which is certaine a woman is Dowable Likewise if any grant to I. S. that hee and his heyres shall take yearely in his Meadow thrée load of Hay c. For Common appendant Parkins saith If a woman accept two acres parcell of a Mannor in allowance of Dower she shall haue no Common appendant aliter if a moitie bee assigned her Eâ— 5. lacobile Countelle of Oxfords case cited in Harpers case Coke 11. Rep. fo 256. Dower shall be of prediall Tythes c. SECT LXI Of what things Dower is not granted OF naked seruices as homage and fealtie there is none endowment nor of a bare annuity granted in fée nor of things vncertaine as of Common without number And if it be granted to I. S. that hee and his heyres shall take so many Estouers in Methold wood as they will burne in c. this will yéeld no Dower no more then a License or grant de coylor bois in auter bois By the old writers if in the first establishment of Dower speciall mention be not made or Aduousons or third presentments the wife cannot haue Dower of any Aduouson pur ceo que aduouson dâ—â—sgly sevest mi departible But when a Mannor with the appurtenances is ordained for Dower if an Aduouson be appendant to the Mannor and the Church become voide after the Husbands death the Wife may present Also by them a woman cannot challenge a Castle chiefe Mease or head of any Baronie or Countie or any thing within the close or Circuit of the chiefe Mease to be assigned her in Dower But for her habitation she may choose aliquod honestum Messuagium de villenagijs that is some bond Tenements within the Mannor-house And where there is none such to choose shee shall haue one clapped vp for her in aliqua platea competenti de commum bosco as long and broad as the third part of her husbands chiefe house A cottage of clay and splints set close in a corner of a cold Common which is but a rewmaticke Lodge to welcome Suitors to But how if the Common and all things bee so inclosed that there is not roome to swing a Cat in women are not put in Rogum with their Husbands any where but in the Indies and I thinke that custome is left there also by this time If there be neither base tenement nor wood nor ground wherewith whereon to build a Widowes habitacle she may bee endowed for necessity of the principall Messuage and without necessity alwayes if the heyre be so contented The reasons which Breton and Bracton doe expresly alleadge for nicenesse of Law making dainty in their time to endow Widdowes in Aduousons and great Messuages is onely the indiuiduity or impartablenes of the things Of an Aduouson because it is but ius quoddam and not corporall and great houses c. for the dignity and strength which the Realme was thought to haue by their conseruation But considering that the end of Dower is chiefly the maintenance of a Wife Si vir premoriatur it may further bee colourably said that Law at first did neuer meane to trouble Widdowes with presenting of Clarkes for that either is not or ought not to bee a matter lucratiue or of gaine though indeede Bracton prize a Benefice of an hundred Markes at one hundred Shillings valew SECT LXII Of what estate of Inheritance the Husband must bee seised THe Learning here is not discrepant from that which went before in title of Courtesie Of fée or fée-taile generall a Woman shall haue Dower so shall she of fée-farme or of a base fée-simple but not of Coppy-hold vnlesse the Custome serue for it And if Tenant for life make a feoffement in fée the wife can haue no Dower 3. H. 4. fo 6. The which Littl. inserteth in this Chapter of Dower viz. where the Husband is seised as heyre of speciall taile c. is no interdiction of Dower in all cases to her which is married to the Donée of speciall taile Littletons own example is That if Lands be giuen to a man and the heyres which he shall ingender of his wife Alice if he dies Alice shall be endowed of this estate for no Issue of a second wife could be heyre of speciall taile and that makes the difference The case 41. E. 3 fo 30. is this A man seised in generall taile by fine made a feoffement and tooke backe an estate in speciall Taile to himselfe and his first Wife and died the King seise by Tenure in capite and endowed the second wife the Issue of the first Wife came shewing the speciall taile and by scire facias against the Wife recouered for default she tooke a second Husband who with his wife brought a quod ei deforceat against the Heyre and hee pleaded the speciall taile the woman by remitting the heyre to the ancient taile would haue concluded him to say that her husband was seised of any other estate Et non allocatur Parkins makes this case somewhat more austere against Dower for as he putteth it fo 60. the Issue is sonne to the Woman which claimeth Dower yet the mother by him not Dowable because the sonne though hee be Heyre is in of another estate then that which was in the Baron during Couerture so likewise 44. Ed. 3. fo 26. in a Writ of Dower against the Heyre Tenant hee sheweth that the band was giuen by fine to his father and mother in speciall taile and that afterwards his father mother discontinued the taile by fine to a stranger and taking backe an estate in generall taile they had Issue this heyre then his mother dyed and the father taking the demandant to wife he died so the sonne was now in per lun taile per lauter and being adiudged in his eigne right by remitter the wife was barred of dower this Case in my conceit fringeth the generality of Littletons rule for the Issue which by possibility the second wife might haue had might by possibility haue inherited though not indefeisably in such estate as was in the Husband during Couerture To conclude where Lands are giuen to the Baron and feme in speciall taile the remainder to the Heyres of the body of the Baron and the Wife dies without Issue there a
in fee-simple or fee-fee-taile Sée the Booke 22. H. 6. fo 18. 19. But may the Lord enter vpon the Land during Couerture quaere If a villeine be possessed of certaine goods and the Lord make seisure of them by poll this is sufficient without seisen in fait But if the villeine die before any seisin and ordaine Executors these Executors shall haue his goods 3. H 4. 15. 16. And a Villeine shall retaine goods which hee hath as Executor against his Lord yea hee may bring Action of debt against him as an Executor all to the vâ—â— of the Testator Also if a Feme gardian in soccage marrie with a villeine I take it the Lord shall haue nothing to doe in this gardianship If a Seignioresse of a Mannor marry her bond-man he is made free and where before hee was her footstoole he is now her head and her Seignior here is part of the particularitie SECT VII The Baron may beate his Wife THe rest followeth Iustice Brooke 12. H. 8. fo 4. affirmeth plainly that if a man beat an out-law a traitor a Pagan his villein or his wife it is dispunishable because by the Law Common these persons can haue no action God send Gentle-women better sport or better companie But it seemeth to be very true that there is some kind of castigation which Law permits a Husband to vse for if a woman be threatned by her husband to bee beaten mischieued or slaine Fitzherbert sets downe a Writ which she may sue out of Chancery to compell him to finde surety of honest behauiour toward her and that he shall neither doe nor procure to be done to her marke I pray you any bodily damage otherwise then appertaines to the office of a Husband for lawfull and reasonable correcâ—ion See for this the new Nat. bre fo 80. f. fo 238. f. How farre that extendeth I cannot tell but herein the sere feminine is at no very great disaduantage for first for the lawfulnesse If it be in none other regard lawfull to beat a mans wife then because the poore wench can sue no other action for it I pray why may not the Wife beat the Husband againe what action can he haue if she doe where two tenants in Common be on a horse and one of them will trauell and vse this horse hee may keepe it from his Companion a yeare two or three and so be euen with him so the actionlesse woman beaten by her Husband hath retaliation left to beate him againe if she dare If he come to the Chancery or Iustices in the Country of the peace against her because her recognizance alone will hardly bee taken he were best be bound for her and then if he be beaten the second time let him know the price of it on Gods name SECT VIII That which the Husband hath is his owne BUt the prerogatiue of the Husband is best discerned in his dominion ouer all externe things in which the wife by combination deuesteth her selfe of proprietie in some sort and casteth it vpon her gouernour for here practice euery where agrees with the Theoricke of Law and forcing necessity submits women to the affection thereof whatsoeuer the Husband had before Couerture either in goods or lands it is absolutely his owne the wife hath therein no seisin at all If any thing when hee is married bee giuen him hee taketh it by himselfe distinctly to himselfe If a man haue right and title to enter into Lands and the Tenant enfeoffe the Baron and Feme the wife taketh nothing Dyer fol. 10. The very goods which a man giueth to his wife are still his owne her Chaine her Bracelets her Apparell are all the Good-mans goods If a Woman taketh more Apparell when her husband dyeth then is necessarily for her degree it makes her Executrix de son tort demesne 33. H. 6. A wife how gallant soeuer she be glistereth but in the riches of her husband Executors if such chattels bee giuen to the wife and to a stranger the husband alone is tenant in Common of them with the stranger Secondly the Court did hold cleerely that in Brackbridges Case and such like the immediate inheritance in the Baron did not drowne the interest of the Feme for the one he had in his owne right and the other in his wiues But by an expresse act as by feoffement or grant of a new lease he might haue giuen away the interest of his wife But leauing all to Law the Law shall saue that interest distinct and preserue it And it was holden in this Case that Baron feme might not ioyne in an eiectione firmae with Anticle but he alone might bring his action and the Baron chased to more higher and more reall Writt Also it was holden the Baron might distraine or haue action of debt for a moity of the rent and as I comprehend the end of Brackbridges case a feoffement by Thomas Brackbridge made of the Mannor whereof the Land seised was parcell and might well drowne all interest Executory which his wife had but not a Lease executed except liuery had beene made in the very Lands seised for a Lease in possession of thrée acres maketh them to bee no parcell of a Mannor during the Lease but a rent charge or a lease executory which is but an interest leaueth the possession entire and no reuersion in the Baron there is further in the Commentaries the Case of Dame Hales viz. Sir Iames Hales Lessée for yeares in his owne right taking a new Lease for twelue yeares ouer in remainder to himselfe and his Wife died felo de se the wholâ— interest was iudged forfeitâ— for the felonye had relation from the act done id est from entrance into the water c. At which time the Baron had power to grant and consequently to forfeit it If the Wife haue a ward by reason of her Seigniory this likewise is a Chattell reall and the Husbands interest in it shall be as in a terme or lease for yeers But if the wife be gardian in socage no lease of the infants land though it be made by Baron and feme per Indenture shall binde the wife but she may enter after the husbands death and if she die the husband shall not haue the Gardianship For in this Case the wife hath nothing to her owne vse but she is an officer appointed vpon confidence in her naturall loue and this office is not grantable nor forfeitable vide nat bre 145. I haue hitherto but shewed what is wrought as it were ipso facto vpon marriages consummation while it is gréene not past a day or a wéeke old and I thought it methodicall to insert the learning of battery because in my poore opinion it were better to combat for houshold mastry in the beginning then to bring a Writt of right for it when it hath gone too long by title of rusty prescription SECT XI Of the Wiues interest of affaires before Marriage
NOw let vs looke backe a little and see what shall become of the dealings which Mistris Titus had whilest shee was Sempronia an agent in the world widdow or maide sola and vncouert SECT XII Of Infancie TO debate matters of infancie would aske a whole volume perse But breefly know that all deeds gifts grants c. made by an Infant which take not effect by deliuery of the infant be absolutely void By matters in fait or writing which take effect by hand and deliuery are onely voydable by the infant or by them which haue the infants estate Out of his rule are excepted acts apparently of necessity or profit to the infant or which can be no disprofit to him for manger boire necessarie apparell and schooling the obligation or couenant of an Infant is good Also an Infants presentation to a Church is good enough for danger of lapse and because it is no matter of emolument and things done by vertue of office as giuing of goods or payment of debts by an infant Executrix are good so are acts which concerne the infants proper purchace As if estate be made to an Infant of two acres to haue and to hold the one for life the other in fee a feoffement of one acre made by the Infant is a good election And it is said fo 104. in Dyer that an Infant is bound by all Statute Lawes if there be not an expresse exemption Now whatsoeuer a Feme sole might auoyd by infancie she and her husband may auoid it by entry or action after Marriage if they take the time else not For example An infant feme sole hath title to enter for Mortmaine within a yeare after alienation or title to enter into the purchase of her villeine before his alienation if by lachesse she let slip her aduantage as she may doe notwithstanding her infancie no wise husband that she taketh afterward can mend it for here was but a title to that which neither she nor her auncestor euer had But if an infant Feme sole haue a right as vpon disseisin done to her or her auncestor she may alwayes enter whilst she is sole notwithstanding any descent during infancie And so may her husband which marrieth her after the descent Littl. teacheth vs fo 95. Chap. Descents that lachesse of a husband which suffers descent shall not toll the entry of a Feme couert or her heyres after Marriage dissolued But there is an addition to Littleton that it is otherwise where a title is already giuen to a Feme sole which taketh a husband and suffers descent c. for it shall now be accounted the Womans folly that shee would take such a husband Howsoeuer it be Law or howsoeuer it be vnderstood the Case before must néeds be good Law for an infant Feme hath as much fauor as an infant Male And taking of an husband cannot toll an entry which was saued to a Feme sole by infancie neither doe I perceiue how the husbands lachesse at the time of descent can toll the Wiues Infancie to make any imputation of folly where infancie might excuse it By Parkins If a man lease two acres to me for life the remainder of one of these acres to a Feme sole which afterwards takes a husband and then the Lessée dying the Baron entreth into one acre and thereof enfeoffes a stranger by mets and bonds the wife shall not after his death enter and if Baron and Feme make a gift in taile or lease for life of the wiues Land rendring rent so soone as the Baron dies the reuersion is onely in the wife who by accepting the rent shall bind her selfe and her heyres But if shée will refuse the rent because she was vnder age at time of the feoffement it séemes she may be receiued to a dum fuit Infra etatem wherby she affirmes the feoffement to be her owne If this be infallible Law I doubt not then if a Feme infant disseised doe marry and during her infancie the husband suffereth a descent but her entry is saued and she may enter after Couerture dissolued if not before But Fitzherbert concludeth with a quaere and so must I. SECT XIII Acts c. of a Feme sole being full Age. VNderstand now by a Feme sole a Woman of sull age If a Feme sole become indebted and marry the Baron and Feme may be sued for this debt during life of the Feme If the Creditor sue the recouer the Baron shall be charged with it after the wiues death aliter non A Feme sole Lessée for life rendring rent takes a husband the rent is arrere the wife dieth though here be no recouery in the wiues life time yet because the Baron tooke the profit he is still chargeable in a Writt of debt for the rent for quisentit commodum sentire debet onus If a Feme endowed of rent take a husband and die the husband shall haue action of debt for the rent arere for it was a duty accrued during couerture But if a man be bound to a Feme sole and she takes a husband and the day of payment comes during Couerture now if she die her husband cannot haue an action of debt vpon the obligation for this was a thing in action before marriage Nat. bre fol. 120. 121. And agréeing to that is 39. H. 6. 27. Br. Testaments 10. but by that booke the Wife may make the Baron her Executor and so saith the Booke of 12. Hen. 7. 22. If a Feme sole being made Executrix take a husband she remaine still a disposer of the Testators goods to his vse and after payment of his debts she may deliuer Legacies and after all that giue the rest for Gods sake maugre le test sa Baron But vpon such a giuing of goods or deliuering of Legacies before payment of debts the husband may haue an action of trespasse for gift before payment is not a right administration but a deuastation of the Testators goods Par. fo 2. and 18. H. 6. A feme sole seised of a carue of land grants out of it a rent Charge by déed and deliuers this deed to a stranger with Condition to deliuer it to the grantée as her déed if he goe to Rome and returne before Easter the Woman takes a husband the grantée performes the Condition the déed is deliuered to him he hath a good rent Charge yet the Baron was seised of the land before the grant tooke effect what though if the Feme had infeoffed a stranger of the land he should haue held it charged for to some intent the grant hath relation from deliuery of the deed as an escrow though for the rent the grantée cannot haue that but for the dayes incurring after the darraine deliuery and if the Feme at the deliuery of the escrow had béene marryed all had béene voyd Par. fo 2. 3. and fo 29. some hath maintained he saith where a Feme sole deliuers an
comfort of your Husband yet a farre greater comfort the effect of Balaams desires Let me die the death of the righteons and let my end be like his SECT XV. The Husbands power in Lands which the Wife holdeth in Dower or otherwise for life THe Husbands Soueraigntie ouer his wife her goods and chattels personall or reall is no lesse then hath béen declared The dominion likewise ouer all manner of Franke Tenements his owne or his Wiues is supereminent in him during Couerture but so that he standeth well bridled from doing any thing a per luy whereby either the Dower which his wife had by a former marriage or expecteth by the present or any other estate for life or in fée can be taken from her when heâ— is gone If a Widdow tenant in Dower marry and her new husband surrendreth c. this is good during Couerture but if the Feme suruiue or if there be a Diuorce causa praecontractus the Feme may enter and defeate the surrender though he to whom it was made be dead and his Heyre in by descent yea and the Law differeth not heere though the Wife had ioyned with the Husband in the surrender But if Baron and Feme will surrender Lands which the wife holdeth for life by fine this shall bind the wife for the wife which is giuer shall be examined c. for no particular Tenant can surrender by fine without being named in the writt wherevpon the fine is leuied Par. 117. If a lease be made to Baron and Feme for life and the Baron make aliâ—nation in fee the Lessour may enter for a forfeiture and maintaine an assise if he be ousted but the Wife surâ—iâ—ing may haue a cui in vira post mortem is by a husband disseised release all his right to the husband and afterward notwithstanding the release brings a writt of entry in nature of an Assise and recouereth against him by default the wife of the releassée shall bee indowed But if the Heyre of a disseisor being in by descent the disseisée re-enter and take a wife now a recouery against the Baron by default or reddition in a writt of entry in nature of Assise taketh away Dower from the wife for the recoueror had right according to the nature of his action and the possession which the Baron had during Couerture is destroyed But it falleth out otherwise where a man is married and then there is a disseisin descent entry and recouery vt supra If a Precipe be brought against the Baron which pleadeth misnosmer or iointenancy and it is found against him whereby the demandant recouereth this ousteth not Dower vnlesse the Demandant had right In a writt of entry in le post against the Baron hee voucheth himselfe to saue the state taile and sheweth how his father gaue him the land in taile and that the fée simple is descended vnto him and vpon a trauerse of the gift in taile it is found for the demandant which recouereth and the Baron dieth Now if so be that the Baron might well haue pleaded a release of all actions or all right of the demandant the Wife may falsifie this recouery in her writt of Dower Tenant in taile hauing Issue dieth a stranger abateth dieth his heyre entreth and takes a wife the Issue of tenant in taile arraignes an assise of Mortdancestor against the Baron which trauerseth the points of the writt and they are found against him so that the demandant recouereth and the Baron dieth It hath béene holden that the wife shall not recouer Dower heere vntill the heyre haue reuersed the verdict by attaint But it seemes saith Parkins he may falsifie the recouery in a writt of Dower maine tenant for the husband might haue pleaded to the action of the demandants writt and if the Feme which by no meanes might haue attaint must tarry till the Heyre haue defeated the verdict perhaps he will neuer sue attaint or he will release so the wife which once was intituled to dower by her husbands possession neuer defected but by his owne lachesse should lose her Dower maugre sat est which seemeth vnreasonable Yet quaere saith he for the iudgement is upon a verdict comprehending matter repugnant and contrary to that which should hee pleaded against the writt But if the demandants entry had béene congeable then out of doubt the wife had had no power of falsifying for the entry had wrought a remitter The Heyre of a Disseisor entreth taking a wife and the Disseisée in a writ of entry ad terminum qui preterit recouereth against the Baron by default the wife may falsifie this recouery in a writ of Dower But it is seldome that the demandant in Dower shall falsifie a recouery against the husband had by his lachesse in not pleading a plea which went méerely in abatement of the writt And therefore to say that the Baron might haue pleaded misnosmer or ioynt-tenancie will not serue to falsifie a recouery But if she can proue that the demandant had no right nor cause of action but iointly with a stranger which stranger by his deed shewed forth to the Court had released before commencement of suit all his right to her husband being in possession this will serue to falsifie the recouery for a moity Thus hath Parkins in his treatie of Dower at large discouered that a title neuer tryed against the Baron in his life time may be tryed by his wife when he is in his grane And so further 36. H. 6. titulo fauxifier de recouerie in Fitzherbert 15. That a woman may falsifie a recouery had against her husband by action tried but it must be in another point and not in the very same which was tried by the recouery SECT XVII Losse of Dower by the Husbands attainder HEe that hath a notable grudge against his wife and would be sure to delude her hope of Dower hath adirect way though it be somewhat dangerous and I will not be of his Counsell Hee needs doe no more but imagine compasse and conspire some detestable renowned treason of the old stampe and if he be once attainted thereof according to his desire c. But if he doe but pingle as suffer himselfe to bee outlawed in action of trespasse this was neuer any forfeiture of Franke Tenement The Law was in the late dayes of Littleton and Parkins that euery attainder of murther or felonie done by the Baron was an ouster of dower to the wife The first Solons of the English Law be like thought that tender regard of a wiues estate should restraine a husband from all inormious transgression against the sacred Crowne and dignitie Royall would God it might but the true reason why the law was so penall for such offences of the husband toward the wife in whom perhaps was no fault that thereby shee should haue no Dower and towards the children that they should haue no descent of inheritance but the hereditary blood should be corrupt was vpon
Lessor running to smoke rightly to smoke which is something more then nothing for if after all this the Lessor bring an action of waste against the Baron and Feme the Baron cannot barre her by shewing her reprisall and remitter but hee is stopped from speaking against his owne Feoffement and receipt So that here may bee an estoppell or conclusion by a matter not witnessed with specialty or any manner Scripture But if in the action of waste the Baron will make default at the grand distresse the wife vpon her prayer receiued to shew her matter shall barre the Lessor of his action right well For in euery case where a woman is receiued to plead in her husbands absence she shall haue aduantage as if shee were a Feme sole And the reason why rendring backe the land by the Alien to Baron and Feme worketh a remitter though it were by â—ne is because a Feme Couert that taketh any thing by fine is neuer examined by the Iustices But where somewhat is to bee conueyed from a Feme Couert by a fine as if Baron and Feme make cognizance to another c. or a grant or render or a release by fine in all or such like cases because the right of a Wife is passing and she shall be eternally concluded she must bee examined before the fine can be receiued and if shee confesse that her husband menaced her if shee would not leuie the fine c. it shall not be receiued 15. E 4 â—0 1. But where nothing is moued in fines saue onely a wiues purchase and gaining there is vsed none examination of her and therefore such fines doe not conclude her If Tenant in taile discontinueth it and dieth and the discontinuee makes a Lease to the Daughter and heyre of the Tenant in taile being of full age and to her husband for their two liues the daughter is remitted If Baron and Feme Tenants in speciall taile be and the Baron alieneth in fée and takes backe an estate to him and his wife for their liueâ— because they are but one person and the estate is likewise one and intire without moities and the Feme cannot be remitted here without the Husband be also remitted they are adiudged both in their remitter But the Baron himselfe is stopped from claiming so much contrary to his owne alienation If Lands he giuen to a Woman in taile remainder to another in taile remainder to a third in taile with remainder ouer in Fee if the woman take a husband that discontinueth in fee all the remainders are discontinued and if the Wife dyeth without Issue there is no remedie but a Formedon by turne if the first second or third Donée die without Issue But if after the discontinuance an estate be made to the Baron and Feme for their owne life or another mans life or any other estate the Wife is remitted and so are all they in remainder If the Feme die the next in remainder may enter and so is it for them in the reuersion after the caile is ended A Lease of a house is made to a Feme sole for terme of her life and in a â—aint or false action a stranger recouereth this house against her by default so that she may haue a quod ei deforcear by West 2. ca. 4. now is the reuersion of the Lessor discontinued and hee cannot haue an action of waste But if the woman marries and the recouerer lease this house to the Baron and Feme for life the wife is remitted to her first estate by the Lease the first Lessor to his reuersion and he may haue action of waste if there because Yet here if the other which recouered in the false action bring an action of waste the Baron hath no other remedie but to make default at the grand distresse and then the wife receiued may bar him by shewing the fainâ—nes or falshood of his action whereby he recouered If after discontinuance c. the Baron take backe estate to himselfe and his Wife and to a third person this is a remitter for a moity and for the other moity the Feme must sue her cui in vita after the death of her Husband If after discontinuance of the Wiues estate the Baron goe beyond the Seas and the discontinued lease the Land to the Wife for life and deliuer seisin if the Baron agree thereunto at his returne this is a remitter for the Feme shall be adiudged as an Infant and not as a Feme sole in this Case Quaere saith Littleton if the Baron at his returne disagree c. whether this oust the Feme of her remitter If the Baron discontinue the discontinuée be diseised and the disseisor lease the tenements to the Baron and feme for life this is a remitter to the Wife though the Baron were consenting to the disseisin But if the Baron and Feme were both of Conen and Consent to the disseisin the wife shall be a disseiseresse and not remitted If the discontinuée make backe estate to Baron and Feme by indenture vpon condition viz. rendring rent and for fault of payment re-entry and because the rent is arâ—eare the discontinuée doth re-enter vpon this entry the woman may haue an assise of nouell disseisin after the husbands decease for the condition by the remitter was cleane extinct in truth though during couerture the Baron was estopped c. so that he and his Wife could not haue an assise together If the Baron discontinue take backe estate to himselfe for life the remainder after his decease to his wife for her life here is no remitter till the husband be dead but the Wife suruiuing Franke Tenement is cast vpon her maine Tenant will she nill she by act of Law and shee is remittted for though shee enter not yet shee can haue none action against any body for this land but any man that hath cause may haue action of it against her because a recipe quod reddat is maintainable against tenant in ley and that is the widdow here But Tenant of Franke Tenement in fair is one which hath an actuall seisin and vpon disseisin thereof may maintaine an assise The Statute of Glocester perceiued how by common Law a man may play fast and loose with his Wiues Inheritance by feoffement to discontinue her estate and to continue it againe by resumption and so to make it Inheritance or not to his wiues at his pleasure But a feoffement doth onely barre the Wiues entry what if to his feoffement the Baron aimes warrantie what if to his warrantie assets what if he leuie a fine Glocester ca. 3. anno 6. Ed. 1. is If Tenant by the Courtesie alion c. his sonne shall not be barred in a Writt of Mortdancester by the deed of his Father from whom none heritage is descended to demand and recouer the mothers land although his Fathers Charter be with warrantie for him and his heyres But if land descend to him de part son
such Lease there shall be reserued yearly to the Lessors their heyres and successors to whom the Lands should haue come after the Lessers death if such Lease had not béene made or to whom the reuersion shall appertaine so much or more annuall ferme or rent as hath béene most accustomably yéelded c. within twenty yeares next before such Leases were made And euery person to whom the reuersion shal appertaine after the death of such Lessors or their heyres shal haue such remedies a aduantages to all intents against the Lessées their executors or assignes as the Lessor might haue had So that if the Lessor were seised in in speciall taile c. the issue or heyre of that speciall estate shall haue the reuersion rent and seruices c. Prouiso that the wife bee made party to euery Lease made by her Husband of any Mannors Lands Tenements or Hereditaments being the wiues Inheritance and that euery such Lease be by Indenture in the name of the Husband and the Wife and she to seale the same And that the ferme be reserued to the Husband and wife and to the heyres of the Wife according to her estate of Inheritance And that the Husband shall not in any wise alien discharge grant or giue any the rent or any part therof longer then during Couerture without it be by fine leuied by the Husband and wife but the rent shall remaine descend reuert or come c in such sort and manner as the land should haue done if no such Lease had béene made prouided that this act extend not to giue liberty of taking more fermes c. then before was lawfull c. nor inable Vicar or Parson to make or grant their Lease of Messuages Lands Tenements Tythes c. or Hereditaments belonging to their Church or Uicarage And it is further enacted that all Leases made within thrée yeares before the twelâ—th of Aprill in the 31 yeare of H. 8. made by Indenture sealed by person or persons of full age of whole memory not vnlawfully coacted nor vnder Couert Baron for terme of yeares of any Mannors Lands tenements or Hereditaments whereof the Lessor or Lessors were seiâ—ed in any estate of Inheritance to their onely vse at the time of their Lease-making and whereof the Lessées their executors or assignes at time of this act Making were in possession by vertue of the Lease no cause of re-entry or forfeiture being had or made shall be good and effectuall in law against the Lessors their heyres and successors according to the couenants and agréements specified in the Indenture c. so that there be reserued to the Lessors their heyres successors c. as much yearely rent as was at any time yéelded within 20. yeares before making of any such lease or else the Leases to be of none other effect then they were of before this act And moreouer it is ordained that no fine feoffement act or acts to be made suffered or done by the husband onely of any Mannors Lands c. being the Inheritance or fréehold of the wife during Couerture betweene them shall in any wise be or make any discontinuance or be preiudiciall to the said wife or her heyres or to such as shall claime right title or interest by her death But that shée or her heyres or they to whom such right or title shall appertaine after her decease shall and may lawfully enter into such Mannors Lands c. any such fine feoffement or other act notwithstanding except fines onely leuied by Baron and Feme wherunto the wife is priuie and a partie Prouided that this clause extend not to giue any liberty to any Wife or her heyres to auoid any Lease hereafter to bee made of any her Inheritance by her husband and her selfe for 21. yeares or vnder or for thrée liues at the most whereupon yearely rent shall be reserued vt supra Prouided also that this act extend not to any Lease heretofore made by Ecclesiasticall or other person by Coâ—eâ—t or Common-seale which Lease is made voyd by act of Parliament nor to make good any Lease of any Ecclesiasticall person made by câ—uent seale or otherwise or of any other person attainted of â—reason c. SECT XXIII The Exposition THis Law in the first part is affirmatiue or I may say leasatiue a leasing Law or Statute Tenant in fée-simple iure mero suo nothing restrained by it No more is Tenant iure vxoris but he may make a Lease for yeares to continue till the last hower of Platoes great yeare or till King Arthur come againe for all this Statute for no greater rent then thrée bundle of bulrushes as well as he might before although her land were neuer leased before since Noaâ—s floud and such a Lease shall bind him during Couerture But if the Husband make a Lease by paroll or by poll déede or by Indenture and the wife not partie or if the Land were not informer times demised or if the ancient rent or more be not reserued then as the earth stayeth in the worlds center vpon nothing but Gods prouidence and permission the Demisée leaneth vpon no Statute but hangeth at the wiues courtesie ponderibus librata suis as at Common Law SECT XXIV Law before the Statute HOw that was yée shall perceiue by the cases following If before the Statute of quia emptores tenant in fée iure vxoris infeoffed a stranger expressing no tenure the feoffés was to hold of the Baron by such seruices as he and the Wife held by of the Lord Paramount If the Baron and Feme had ioyned in a Feoffement to hold of the Baron c. th expressed tenure had béene voyd and the Feoffee must haue held of them both by such seruices as they held ouer c. If the Baron in this case had died and the Wife accepted the rent in her viduity this acceptance here barred her for euer from auoyding the Feoffement by Writt of cui in vita If Tenant iure vxoris and his Wife had made a Feoffement to hold of the Wife the Feoffor should haue held of them both and if the Wife had died the Feoffor was to hold of the Baron till the feoffement were auoyded by sur cui vâ—a Par. 126. Againe if before this Statute of 32. H. 8. Tenant in fée iuro vxoris and his wife had ioyned in exchange for other lands in fée and the exchange being executed the Husband had dyed now the Feme by entring in vpon the Land giuen her vpon the exchange should be barred for euer from defeating the exchange But if it had béene made by the Baron alone she might haue defeated it notwithstanding her entrie for that could giue noseisin by force of the exchange to her that was neither partie nor priuie to it Par. fo 8. And if a man seised in right of his Wife c. make a Lease for life rendring rent with a letter of Atturney to his Wife to make liuery the Wife deliuers
hath not the force of a negatiue implying in nul auter manner then is therein described Amy is therefore a ioynt purchaser with her husband in estate for life and not in or by descent of estate taâ—â—e Now to say that her right and estate should change by silent operation of the Law after shee was repossessed that cannot be for the whole entry is tolled and if she be not remitted by her first possession and reprisall she is neuer remitted If a Disseisour make feoffement to the vse of the Disfeisée and after the Disseisor enter he shall be remitted but before his entry he shall not be remitted for he shall be adiudged in possession by vertue of the Statute but so soone as hee entreth he is remitted for his entry was neuer tolled But Amy Townesends entry was cleane taken away by the discontinuance c. further if she should be remitted by the Statute of 27. the remainders should be all destroyed contrary to the text of the same Statute And to the inconueâ—iencie alleadged if she shall not be remitted shee shall hold incombred with the charges of her Husband that is none at all for Amy after her husbands death might haue disagréed and relinquished the vse with possession annexed to it by bringing a cui in vita against him next in remainder for in him by such disagréement or vser of action had the remainder vested as though the woman had beene a Monke or dead person in Law or neuer named in the limitation If the vse had béene to Amy Townsend in fée she might haue brought her cui in vita against the Feoffor or his heyre by which they shall be Tenants to her action and so might the inâ—umbrance haue béene auoyded for when a feoffement is to the vse of one which refuseth the vse it shall be in effect as if the vse had beene limited to Paules stéeple or to Charing-Crosse all falling or reflecting because the Feoffor hath no recompence or consideration to his vse and hee shall be Tenant to euery Precipe It was further agreed that as the Cause fell out Amy Townesend could not be remitted though her possession had returned by refeoffemeÌ„t at the Common Law because Sir Roger Townesend her Husband outliued her for 21. Ed. 3. the Case is Baron made a Feoffement the Feoffée â—einfeoffe the Baron and Feme and heyres of the wife she woman dyed the Heyre entred the Baron brought an Assise which was iudged maintainable for whilest the Baron liued he was tenant to the heyres action And the thâ— Iudgement was that Amy Townsend was neuer remitted the reason was indéed because there is nothing in the Statute of 27. to make a remitter for the clause of sauing of Drâ—its Titles and Actions is of such right c. as was before the Statute and not of any right title or action risen since or after it Now note that as a Lease made for twenty yeares by Baron and feme Tenants for life binds not any remainder by the Statute which speaketh onely that Leases made by Tenants of Inheritance shall binde heyres and Successors so I would inferre that if the Leassors inheritance be determined whether it were iure vxoris in taile or otherwise in taile the remainder must be frée from the Statute But note that the point which made me choose this case for illustration of the Statute is this Amy Townesend was iudged not remitted because she had no title of entry but onely by the 27 c. of vses and therefore she must néeds claime her possession according to the vse But put Case the Feoffement had béene since the Statute of 32 the Law would then haue iudged a remitter for by Littleton where any persons entry is congeable which taketh estate for life or in fée it is a remitter if the reprisall be not by Indenture or record or some matter of estoppell for alwayes where there is a double right or title the Law must iudge for the best as well in the entry as in the possession and an Indenture made by Baron and Feme is none estoppell to the Wife by the Common Law Concerning the Case 21. Ed. 3. Wilby which gaue iudgement thought the Barons aduantage a hinderance to the Remitter yet if he died the wife should be remitted But if you looke Brooke remitter 21. and 41. ye shall finde that the Feme was maintenant remitted though to saue the husbands aduantage of warranty they would not so iudge it quod mirum saith Brooke and quaere quia contrarium a ceo iour SECT XXVII Whether acceptance or taciturnity may not take away an entry at this day NO fine feoffement or other act done by the husband onely shall make any discontinuance or be preiudiciall to the wife but that she may enter c. what if Baron and Feme make a feoffement or Lease for life by solemne Indentures with Liuery and seisin cleere this takes not away at this day the wiues entry after Couerture ended But admit when shee is a widdow shee refuseth to enter and accept payment of rent or performance of couenants is not now both her entry and her action gone also euen as in case of an Infant which makes such a feoffement or Lease and accepts the rent when he is of full age The question must be answered out of the Statute and in mine opinion there is nothing in it to ayde a woman after such ratification by acceptance volenti non fit iniuria nec inuitis confirmantur beneficia A Lease by Baron Feme per Indenture is not voyd presently by the Barons death But whereas before she was driuen to suit and action shee may now enter by the Statute yet it compels her not to enter neither caâ—teth any frée-hold vpon her In like manner if the Baron alone alien his Wiues Land by fine with proclamation the Wife may enter by force of this Statute but per opinionem totius curiae Ed. 6. Dyer fo 72. If she suffer fiue yeares to passe and expire without entry or vser of action she and her heyres shall be barred for euer for this Statute of 32. though it limit no time for the womans entry yet it speaketh nothing of fines with proclamation and therefore it takes not the generall Law made 4. Hen. 7. cap. 24. of fines with proclamation And sée Sir Ed. Cokes 8. Rep. fo 72. in Grenlies case SECT XXVIII Of Fines SEe further the case 18. Eliz. Dyer 351. Land holden in socage was giuen to a man and his wife in taile the remainder in sée to the Barons right heyres the Baron alone leuied a fine with proclamation to his owne vse and afterward by his last will and Testament in writing deuised the Land to his wife for life the remainder ouer to a Stranger vpon condition to pay certaine rent annually out of the land with Clause of distresse c. the Baron died the wife entering and claiming estate onely for life paid rent
shall be deemed and construed to be the act of both of them as if the Baron seised in right of his Wife or ioyntly with his wife assigne Dower to another woman it bindeth and so granting of a rent for equality of partition and atturnement by the Baron alone bindes the Wife SECT XXX of Iointures I Will enter no further into the streame of Fines and recouerie they require a cunning swimmer And a short Discourse cannot possibly make any plaine discouery of them otherwise this place would haue borne the Doctrine fitly about making of ioyntures for all husbands are not so vnkinde or vntrusty as to endamage their Wiues by alienation of their Lands but contrariwise the greatest part of honest wise and sober men are of themselues carefull to purchase somewhat for their Wiues if they be not yet they stand sometimes bound by the womans parents to make their Wiues some Ioynture If husband Father Mother and all would be vnmindfull of prouision in this point yet very many of our English women haue with their singular vertue so much wisedome of their owne as to foresee for themselues and discerne the difference betwéene that which wee call Dower and Ioynture Ioyntures saith Dyer 4. M. fo 148 are made for the most part to Baron and Feme ioyntly or to the Feme onely this also is comprehended vnder the terme Ioynture before Marriage or after for sustentation of the charge and necessities of Espousalls and they are made causa matrimonâ—â— gratis without the consideration of money bargaine or any thing sauing for loue and affection of the Baron or his ancessors and these Iointures are a present possession But Dower must be tarried for till the Husband be dead It must be demanded sometime sued for sometime neither with suit or demand obtained Againe Dower was subiect to forfeiture in times past by felony done and proued in the Baron by the Barons treason by the Wiues elopement and euery question in the validitie of Marriage maketh a scruple of Dower all which inconueniences being wisely foreséene women did learne to become ioynt purchasors with their husbands of such estates as would auoid all weathers and a good while they did enioy Ioyntures and Dowers after their Husbands were dead against which the Statute of 27. H. 8. of vses ordeineth as followeth SECT XXXI A part of 27. H. 8. ca. 10. IT is prouided c. that where any persons haue purchased or haue estate of lands c. made to them and their Wiues and to the heyres of the Husband or to the Husband and wife and the heyres of their two bodies or to the heyres of one of their bodies or to the husband and wife for terme of their liues or for the life of the wife or where any such estate hath béene or shall be made to any husband and his wife or to other persons their heyres and assignes to the vse and behoofe of the said husband and wife or to the vse of the wife for the ioynture of the wife that in euery such case the woman hauing such a Ioynture c. shall not claime any Dower of the residue of any Hereditaments that were her Husbands by whom she had such a Ioynture or make any demand thereof against the Tenants of the said lands c. prouided that if any woman be lawfully expulsed or euicted from her said Ioynture or from any part thereof without fraud or Couen by lawfull entry action or discontinuance of her Husband that euery such woman shall be endowed of as much of the residue of her Husbands hereditaments as the Lands or Teneâ—ents so euicted shall amount or extend vnto Prouided that nothing in this act extend to hurt or preiudice any woman heretofore married concerning her right title vse interest or possession which she may claime or pretend to haue for her Ioynture or Dower in any Lands c. of her late Husband being now disseised Prouided also that if any Wife haue or hereafter shall haue any Lands Tenements or Hereditaments vnto her giuen or assured after Marriage for terme of her life or otherwise in Ioynture except the assurance be made to her by act of Parliament and the Wife after that fortune to out-liue her husband in whose time the Ioynture was made that the Wife so ouer-liuing shall and may at her pleasure refuse the Lands appointed or assured in Ioynture and thereupon haue demand and take her Dower by Writt or otherwise according to the Common Law SECT XXXII The Exposition THe first obseruance is that no estate gained by matter of conclusion shall be déemed a purchasement within this Statute or bee auerred to bee made pro iunctura But the Statute must be intended of true and substantiall estates Therefore if an owner or tenant of certaine land make answer to Baron and Feme in an action of waste or if he pray ayde of them as if they were seised of the reuersion or if he bring a quod ei deforceat against them as if he had none other then a particular estate though these things were purposed for Ioynture yet they seclude not a Woman from right or demand of Dower Releases such as inure to make estates as where a ioynt-tenant releaseth to his Companion or such as goe to inlarge an estate as where he in reuersion releaseth to his particular Tenant may well make and accomplish a Ioynture but such Releases as worke no more but vn mitter le droit as where he that is disseised by Baron and Feme releaseth to the woman the disseiseresse c. are no purchase intended within this Statute for it is meant onely of such purchases as the wife hath by gift either of her husband or of some other body and not of such estates as shee hath gained by her owne wrong likewise is it of releases that goe by way of extinguishment as where a Disseisor infeoffeth Baron and Feme and the Disseisée releaseth to one of them this is alike auaileable to both but this release can make no Ioynture for there is no estate conueyed by it Per iusticiarios 6. Ed. 6. Brooke titles Dower a deuise of Land by the Husband to his Wife in his last will and testament is no barre of Dower for it is but a beneuolence and no Ioynture Yet in M. Brograues reading it was holden contrary 5. Eliz. Dyer 220. the case is that a man seised of Lands in taile and of some other in fée-simple holden in socage deuiseth the third part of all his Lands to his wife for her life in full recompence of all such Ioynture and Dower as she shall haue or may claime c. the Wife without any assignement or vser of Action of Dower entreth after his death into that which was holden in Fée-simple to a value of a third part of all and the opinion was she had determined her election and barred her selfe of Dower But this Case maketh nothing to the variance or question because the
de peccatis for the heire could not be bastardized when the parents both or one of them were dead and therefore not citable to appeare c. And it is holden strongly by Thorpe 39. Edw. 3. and in the Parliament 24. H. 8. see Brooke titulo Bastardie 23. 37. 44. 47. And a diuorce cannot bee had but of a marriage consisting and not yet by death dissolued for there cannot wel be a reuersing of any diuorce when the parties diuorced be dead as Brooke vnderstandeth Connings by 12. H. 7. 22. for saith he it was adiudged in Coâ—bers case where the baron and feme had issue and afterward were diuorced the baron taking another wife by whom he had issue and died that when the first issue sued in spirituall Court to reuerse the diuorce and bastardize the second issue after his fathers death a prohibition lay But it was said that the title and discent were comprised in the libell or else the prohibition could not haue beene granted Thus saith Brooke titulo Deraignment But titulo Bastardy 47. hee setteth downe the same case that a man may be bastardized after the espousals wherein he was begotten and borne or by death determined Sée Sir Edw Cokes 7. report Kennes case that some diuorces dissolue the matrimony scilicet à vinculo matrimonei and bastardize the issue and â—arâ—â— the woman of her Dower and some à mensa Thoro which dissolueth not the marriage nor barre the wife of her Dower nor bastardize the issue And therefore if any action be brought and diuorce pleaded the cause of diuorce ought to bée shewed And there it is said that a diuorce may be repealed in the spirituall Court after the death of the parties but a suit after the death of the parties to diuorce them and to bastardize their issue may not be for that the triall of bastardy or not belongeth to the temporall Court originally if sentence doe not hinder And sée Sir Edw. Cokes Institut ca. Dower f. 33. ca. Estates upon condition fol. 181. the deriuation of the word diuorce à diuertendo or dinoâ—â—â—ndo quia vir diuertitur ab vxore and sée there the seuerall causes of diuorces and how for any of them respectiuely doe extend in power and effect and in Littletons tune many diuorces were of force which the Statute of 32. H. 8 cap. 8. take away and there sée that a man may marry the sister of his first wife since that Statute By Na. br â—â—l 44. in the writ of prohibition and Na. br 1â—9 and Dyer 28. H. â— 1â— agrée if the woman shall haue the goods not spent and that detinue lyes for them If goods be giuen in marriage with a woman shée shall recouer them in the spirituall Court after diuorce and there lyeth no prohibition â—6 Hen. 8. fol. 7. is that if the husband before diuorce had haue giuen or sold without collusion such goods as were the wiues before marriage she is without remedy for them being diuorced But if he aliened them by collusion and bring a writ of detinue for so much of them as the property may bée decerned of and for the residue money and such like shee shall sue in spirituall Court If a man which is bound to a woman by obligation marry her and they be diuorced she hath her action againe which was suspended ibid by Fitzh and Norwich But see the booke of 11. Hen. 7. 4. p Cur. contrary where the diuorce is causa praecontract ' and it is so cited Dyer 4. Mar. fol. 140. If the woman diuorced were an Inheritrix c. and the husband before diuorcement hath done waste felled her woods receiued her rents granted her wards presented to her Churches giuen away her goods none of these things past in possession executed can be reuersed or recalled But if the Inheritance it selfe were discontinued or charged or a release made of it or hir villaines manuâ—â—itted shée shall haue remedy for these things by common Law If baron and feme Iointpurchasers de disseised and the baron release c. the wife shall haue a moiety if they bee diuorced although before there were no moieties betwixt them for the diuorce conuert that into moieties which sée Brooke title Deraignement and diuorce 32. H. 8. In Sir Edward Cokes 5. Rep. in Olands case it was holden that if a Lease bée made to baron and feme during the Couerture and the baron soweth the land and after there is a diuorce causa praecontract the baron shall haâ—e the Corne and not the lessor for although the baron prefecuted the suit yet the sentence which dissolues the marriage is the iudgment-in Law and Iudicium redditur in â—â—ultum And as by diuorce that which was intire may bée conuerted or diuided into moeties so by it inheritance may bee made francktenement And if baron and feme donées in taile haue issue and be diuorced now they haue but francktenement and the issue shall not inherit for it is not like here as where lands are giuen to two men or â—o a man and his mother or to a man and his daughter and to the heires of their bodies where seuerall heires shall seuerally inherit for it was neuer lawfull for them to marry 7. Hen. 4. 16. Brooâ— 9. in titulo Taile sée also 13. Edw. 3. titulo Deraignment If land be giuen to baron and feme in taile which be diuorced causa praecontract c. they shall hold ioyntly for terme of their liues and the land goe to the Suruiuor But by the Reporter if the gift were in franckmarriage the party which did not cause the diuorce shall haue all and agreeing to that difference is Perk. Chap. feoffement Sect. 238. and also agréeing is Sir Edw. Cokes 9. Rep. in Beamonts case 12. Assisar p. 22. Dorees in franckmarriage were diuorced at the womans suit the baron continued possession till he died and afterward the womandied the possession was adiudged to haue remained alwayes to the woman because shee neuer made any debate for it so that the man neuer had it by disseisin and agréeing to that is Plowden Wymbysses case fol. 58. Dyet 3. M. fol. 126. 19. Assisar plac 2. The Doâ—â—e in franckmarriage wedded infra annus nubiâ—es sued diuorce by the barons motiue and the wiues agréement at their full age and the woman recouered all the land against her quondam husband by assise And Titulo Assise in Fitzh pla 413. 44â— is this case A man of certaine tenements infeoffed his feoffor his wife in tayle the remainder to the right heires of the baron they were diuorced at the suit of her husband which kept the woman out of the lands and she brought an Assise whereby she recouered a moyty of the tenemen's by iudgement presently And propter difficultatem it was adiâ—rned for the other mâ—ity to the Commonpleas where shee had â—udgement of that also because diuorce was at the husbands sâ—â—t As a woman may haue an Assise against her
companion diuorced for lands wherein shee claimeth inheritance or estate for life so if he haue aliened in sée â—ée tayle â—r for life the lands which he had in fée simple â—ée â—a le or for terme of life to a stranger she may as soone as she iâ— diuorced bring a Writ called a â—â—i ante diuorâ—â—â—m against the Alâ—enee And this Writ may be in the per cuâ— post If shee dye before action commenced or before recouery her heire may haue a Writ called a surâ—uranâ—e diuortium and the Aunt and Néece may joyne in iâ— But for her estate tayle her heire shal be put to a formidone But note Reader that it séemeth both the woman and her heire may enter after the Statute of 32. Hen. 8. and neuer bring Cui in vita nor sur cuim viâ—a c. for the opinion in Grenlies Case Sir Edw. Cokes 8. Rep. fol. 73. is that if the baron alien and after the wife is diuorced causa praecontract which dissolue the marriage à vinculoma rimonii the wife during the life of the husband or after his death may enter for the words of the Aâ—tare nâ— fine feâ—ffeinent c. during the Couerture betwéene them and although the Statutâ— saith But that the same wife c. that is to be intended of her which was his wife at the time of the alienation c. Note that whereas West 2. cap. â— giueth a cui in vita vpon recouery by default against the husband c. shée shall haue a cuâ—â—hâ—e diuortium vpon the like â—eâ—ouery by equity extension of the Statute and the processe is summons grand cape peâ—iâ— cape I wil here set the bounds and limits of my third booke not because this sequell and consequence â—iuorte I meane whereby the issue had is basâ—â—â—â—â—zed and the wâ—â—an restored to her goods and lands conforteth with the marriage so perfectly begun as I meant it for this is not the vntying of true wedlocke but rather a dissipation of marriage tainted at the beginning and in Christian Court adiudged to a â—â—llity as if it had neuer béene the Baron and Fâ—me that I hâ—â—â— spoken of all this while if they were not married in their infant loue and very first flowing age yet were they not â—rostbitten or so blasted either of them when they were young but they might well haue frâ—â—tified neither was either of them a common Law breaker intangled with promise or praecontract and as for consanguinity or affinity there was no more betwixt them than is betweene Iack Flecher and his bolt You may imagine some matter by onely imagination perhaps more visible than it could haue béene being true whereupon a publike sentence of seperation being published a Thoro mensa but then there was a monition of chast liuing and prohibition to both the parties that neither of them should flâ—â— to other marriage so long as both of them were liuing And the Author of seperation that is the party suing diuorce did put in sufficient caution to doe nothing contrary to this prohibition So that the holy liues of matrimony were not cleane broken and pulled asunder but within a yéere or two they were reconciled voluntarily of their â—wne accord And soone after so I will make it hauing the Distaffe Spindle and Shéeres all in mine owne hand the husbands life was suddenly cut off or else the wiâ—e had béene sole executrix THE WOMANS LAWYER The fourth BOOKE PAle death equo pulsans pede pauperum tabernas regnumque â—urres Death I say to whom the Poet did attribute so much power in this his verse Omnia sub leges mors vocat aâ—â—a suas hath called the husband hence left the house full of mourning and specially the wife cannot chuse but sorrow and lament If my â—oure legged beast should fall into halues the one halfe starke dead without motion or spirit and the other halfe standing still vpright senting séeing féeling gazing must it not thinke you be wonderfully astonished If an Elephant in whom as some dâ—e write is vnderstanding of his countries spéech a wonderfull memorie and recenting of things past a great delight in loue and glorie besides prudence equitie and religion should haue his head cut off his body remaining still for all that vegetable and sensitiue would he not trow yée be excéeding sorrowfull for the forgoing such an ornament I dare be bold to giue a woman as much as Pliny gaue the Elephant She hath vnderstanding and spéech firme memorie loue naturall and kindnesse desire of glorie and reputation with the accomplishment of many meritorions vertues But alas when she hath lost her husband her head is cut off her intellectuall part 〈…〉 gone the verie faculties of her soule are I will not s 〈…〉 cleane taken away but they are all be 〈…〉 ned di 〈…〉 ed and dazled so that she cannot thinke or remember when to take rest or refâ—ction for her weake body And though her spirits and naturall moysture being inwardly exhausted with sorrow and extreme griefe she be called and inforced to seeke restauration by such aliments as life is prolonged by yet is she nothing desirous of life hauing lost a moytie of herselfe yea the principall maytie now best prised and estéemed but neuer best loued Time must play the Physitian and I will helpe him a little Why mourne you so you that be widowes Consider how long you haue beene in subiection vnder the predeminance of parents of your husbands now you be frée in libertie frée propriiâ—uris at yoâ—r owne Law you may see num cap. â—0 That maidens and wiues vowes made vpon their soules to the Lord himselfe of heauen and earth were all disauowable and infringible by their parents or husbands vnlesse they ratified and allowed them either expresse or by silence at the day when such vowes came first to their notice and knowledge But the vow of a widow or of a woman diuorced no man had power to disallow of for her estate was free from controlment Must a woman néeds wéepe thus for the losse of her Buckler Shield and defence in the person of him with whom she held daily commutation of all offices proceeding from loue and superlatiue kindnesse Let her learne to cast her whole loue and deuotion on him that is better able to loue and defend her than all the men in the world Him I meane that hath forbiddâ—n to afflict widdowes or orphans with promise to heare their cries and vindicate their wrongs by killing them by the sword and making the wiues widdowes and their children fatherlesse of them which breake this Commandement Exod. cap. 22. Then because a sober carefulnesse and moderate sedulitie in businesse of profit or disprofit doth mitigate greatly the sorrowing for such actions as opinion or fancie makes thus grieuous let her looke to her affaires as cause and need requireth SECT I. Of Executorship and Administration SHe is not made an Executor because the office is troublesome let her take
of the heire non aliter This saith Dyer is holden no good pleading for the quarentiâ—â— but shee should haue shewed the death of her husband certaine and the time of the forty dayes continuing therefore the opinion of the Court made her wâ—iâ—â— her plea and trauers the entry nâ—ta prolege If a woman marry within the forty dayes shee loseth her quarentine Dower Brooke â—y Dower 101. 1. M. But if otherwise she be ouâ—â—ed by the heire within the forty dayes shee shall haue a Writ de quarentena habenda no â—â— br 161. b. SECT IV. Assignement of Dower NOw to assignement of Dower it is true that when it appeares certaine what it is that a woman shall haue in Dower shee may enter presently when her husband is dead and tarry for none Assignement per Littleton yet Perkins saith if a man dye seised of iij. s. rent charge in fee though here the third part bee certaine enough his widdow shall not distraiâ—â—â— for xij d. before Assignement Nay further if she recâ—â—â—â— this Dower by action yet shee shall not distraine for it before execution But if the Lord of a Manor doe marry with a woman tenant by iij. s. rent and dye here shée shall haue xij d. Dower by way of reteiner without any Assignement And in case where rent is recouered in Dower the Viscount may deliuer seisen by grasse by a bough by a clod of land or by the distresse of beasts taken vpon the land though the day of payment be not yet come But the party cannot charge any those beasts 40. Ed. 3. fo 22. SECT V. who may assigne Dower SOmetime Dower is assignable by the husbands heire as if a man seised of two acres of land in one County make a feoffement of one acre with warranty and dye the heire may indow the widdow with parcell of the acre remaining in allowance and full satisfaction of the whole Dower bene for if in a writ of Dower brought by her against the feoffée of her husband hee vouch the heire c. shee shall recouer conditionally against the voucher And if the heire make a Lease for life of part of such lands as are to him descended and indow his mother of the parcell remaining in allowance of all c. it is good yet in this case in a Writ of Dower against the Lessée if hée vouch his Lessor the recouery shall not be against the vouchée because he is not bound to warranty as the heire of his father But if he had béene generally vouched the heire and had generally entred into warranty iudgement perhaps should bee conditionally against him Sometimes the husbands one feofee or vendée shall assigne Dower for the rest And if a woman accept Dower from one of her husbands feofées in parcell of his land in allowance of her Dower of the rest it séemeth this shall binde her against the other 〈…〉 fees yet some haue doubted thereof because the other feoffees say they cannot plead this in an action of Dower against them neither is there meanes to bring into Court him which made assignement being a stranger If diuers Ioyntenants bee of certaine lands assignement of Dower by one of them shall bée good against them all But if one Ioyntenant of land assigne rent in allowance of Dower his followes shal not be distrained for this rent for there could bee none inforcement to assigne Dower after this manner Likewise if the Desseisor assigne a rent charge out of the land this shall not bind the desseisâ—e causa qua supra Assignement of Dower may be by one which is a Disseisor Abator or Intrâ—dor c. if this assignement be without fraud in the woman indowed and sans â—orâ— to any other person it is good though the Assignor be a tortious Possessor but if there bee any such couine or tort the assignement is voidable for the most part by entry 44. Ed. 3. fol. 46. A woman that had title of Dower with intent of defeating the Tenants warranty made a stranger to enter and against him she recouered Dower it was holden in an Assize which shee brought afterwards that hee recouery would not serue her but her estate was gained by desâ—isin because of the couine Assignement of Dower by him which hath Francktenement is good and if the wife hath not right of Dower of that which is so assigned by the Tenant of the Francktenement yet that shall stand vntill it bee defeated And if tenant per elegit statute staple or statute merchant assigne Dower it is not good And Assignement of Dower by gardian in soccage séemes not to be good saith Perkins for a Writ of Dower lyeth not against such a gardian sée 29. Assis p. 68. But Assignement by gardian in Chiualry is good till it be defeated and it shall neuer be defeated if the womans title of Dower be iust SECT VI. Assignement to her selfe or de la pluis beale IF a man seised of forty acres of land 20. by Chiualry and 20. by soccage die c. and his wife being gardian in soccage bring her Writ of Dower in the Kings or some others Court against the Lord which is gardian in Chiualry he may plead this matter and pray to haue it adiudged that the woman indow her selfe of the faâ—â—est in her owne possession and if she cannot deny the case it shall be iudged for the Lord to retaine quietly the lands which hee hath during the nonage of the Infant And after this iudgement the woman may indow her selfe in presence of her neighbours by limits and bounds de la pluis beale part of the soccage lands to haue to hold to her selfe for terme of her life This manner of indowment is neuer before iudgement bee giuen for it either in the Kings or some other Court and it is to saue the state of gardian in Chiualry Perkins giueth this matter which Litlton leaueth thus raw a turne or two more And so doth Keble 14. Hen. 7. 26. If say they the land which the woman hath by her gardianship bee not the whole valew of her iust Dower for the smalnesse of it or because it is charged with some rent she may shew the matter in her replication And if the Lord cannot deny it or doe trauers it and it is found against him then shall the woman haue so much of the lands holden in Chiualry as together with that shee hath in possession already may make vp iust a third part of her husbands inheritance If the inheritance were all of soccage tenure the widdow being gardian cannot indow her selfe de la pluis beale but shee shall be allowed a third part in her accompt for so long time as shee is Gardian for if she bring her Writ of Dower in this case against the heire he cannot plead her gardinship and that she may indow her selfe Sée 45. Edw. â— fol. 6. If such a Feme gardian bring a Writ of Dower against one whom her husband
impedit the Plaintiffe may haue one writ to the Bishop and another to the Sheriffe to enquire of dammages Likewise 14. H. 8. fol. 25. in a plea of dower vpon confession the demandant recouered Iudgement and after Iudgement auerring that her husband died seised shee prayed a writ to enquire of dammages habuit for if the demandant in dower will recouer dammages shee must euer surmize that her husband died seised though the Tenant confesse the Action or plead but onely to the Writ and in the end of her Demise shee may maintaine the Writ for sur plee briefe the dying seised appeares not without surmise c. 22. H. 6. fol. 44. SECT X. Deteiner of Euidence BY Perkins none may deteine Dower for deteining of euidence but only the heire to whom the euidence belongeth and the heire when he pleads must shew what the euidence is c. And they must concerne the lands discended vnto him whereof Dower is demanded for hée may not deteine Dower of land which the Charters concerne not or for Charters concerning his purchased lands or those whereof he hath no seisin Aliter if they concerne some reuersion descended But if the heire come in vouched to warranty by the Barons feofée hée cannot plead this Deteiner of Euidence because in verity the land is another mans to whom most rightly the Charters belong But one copercener may haue this plea after partition against her mother or other Demandant in Dower though the euidence concerne the other parceners and her all alike see 41. Titulo Dower in Brooke If a widdow that is with child deteine euidence against her husbands daughter and heire or other heire collaterall it shall bée no sufficient plea to delay Dower 1. Perkins 70. 71. 18. Hen. 8. fol. 1. The heire said the Demandant deteined a bagge ensealed with the euidence concerning the land which if hée would deliuer hee was ready to render Dower bone plee per Curiam 33. Hen. 6. fol. 51. The Tenant pleaded for part of the land whereof Dower was demanded non tenure for another part detinue of Charters for another part Ioyntenancie which his father for a fourth part demanded view but it might not be granted because he tooke notice to himselfe of that part by pleading to the rest And the Plaintiffe to his plea of suruiuor pleaded his release made to the father her husband in his life time Issiâ—â— seisi que Dowre c. The plea of Euidence detained as Littleton said went to the whole action quod fuit negatum vâ—de Brooke â—y Dower 4 but he was forced to shew what euidence he deteineth viz. a speciall Charter 4â— Ed. 3. The Tenant pleaded a withholding of Euidence certaine conceâ—ning his inheritance and shewes what Et qâ—e il aâ— estre toures temps prist si c. the woman made title to two deeds by gift to her husband and her selfe and for the other Euidence shee said whereas the Defendant claimed as brother and heire to her husband shee kept it to the vse of her child si ouâ—sqÌ„ soit inseint qÌ„ serra â—eure si dien luy done nostre and issue was taken whether she were insâ—int die obitus mariti not whether shee were inseint per son baron die obitâ—s And that booke of 41. Edw. â— is cited for law in Sir Edw. Cokes 7. Rep. fol. 9 that a woman may deteine Charters for the heire in ventre â—a mere And 22. Hen. 6. fol. 16. It was agréed that deteiner of Euidence is no plea in an Action of Dower vnlesse it concerne Inheritance discended Et siâ— videtur ibidem saith Brooke that if it concerne inheritance though it be not the very land whereof Dower is demanded the plea is good 9. Edw. 4. to plea of Charters deteined the Demandant answered veies cyâ—le fait prâ—â— dower the Court reading and perceiuing it to bee the déed c. gaue iudgement for Dower 14. Hen. 6. fol. 4 The Tenant pleaded detinue of a chest with two fines and other Charters ê‘ Martin Iustice if the Chest were open he ought to declare euery déed specially by it selfe and so it is likewise in action of detinue for a Chest open with euidence quod curia concessit 2. Hen. 7. fol. 6. Is set downe the reason why the certainty of euidence deteined must bee showne viz. That the Iury may be more able to make their verdict and the Court to iugde to whom they appertaine for if they belong to the Defendants purchase he is put to a Writ of detinue And 6. Eliz. Dyer 230. sée a man seised of foure acres soccage land and of one déed or Charter concerning those lands by his last will in writing deuised thrée of his acres to his youngest sonne in fée the fourth acre to his wife for life the remainder to a stranger in fee hâ— died his wife got the déed entred into her acre and the sonne into the three acres deuised to him the woman brings a Writ of Dower for a third of these thrée acres The sonne pleads detinue of the Charter which if she would deâ—â—uer he is and alwayes had beene ready to render Dower shee shewed the whole cause by way of replication vpon that the other side demurred It seemeth saith Dyer that this plea serueth for none saue only the Barons heire and for no land but that which is descended And not for the heire himselfe if he come in by voucher or â—s Tenant by receipt in default of Tenant for life Where hee is no more but tenant per admittance for such a one cannot say that he hath béene toutes temps prist a render Dower si c. Neither can gardian in chiualry haue this plea for he cannot haue a writ of detinue of the heires euidence And this plea is a bar for no lands but those which the Charters deteined do concerne 22. H. 6. Where Newton saith the reason of this barre is because the euidence being séene and looked into may yéeld matter to barre the Demandant of her Dower for such lands therefore as the Charters doe not touch Dower shall be granted of them this plea notwithstanding Also certainty must euer bee alleaged in this case if the euidence bee not in some bag boâ— or chest sealed or locked vp And note the Defendant supra was not named heire by the demandant neither had he inabled himselfe to this plea as heire therefore the Court might take it indifferently As in a quare impedit if the incumbent bee named Clericus the Court takes him for a Disturber if hee inable not himselfe as incumbent or person impersonée Another fault was found in this Tenants conclusion of his plea because hee said vncoâ—e prist a render Dower but in very déed hee relied not againe on the condition if the Demandant would deliuer the Charter according to the ancient booke of entries And at the last iudgement was giuen pro dote Sée Sir Edw. Cokes 9. Rep. in Anna Beddingfelds case 1.
seisi que Dower la puit It was giuen in eâ—idence to the Inquest on the Demandants â—ehalâ—e that a feosment was made to the â—aron in fee yâ— déed of feofment was shewed to the Court it was answered that long time before the feofment the Earon was seised to him and his first wife in speciall taile and how afterward hee discontinâ—ed that and takes backe an estate in fée simple to himselfe by â—he 〈◊〉 aforesaid of which estate hee died seised so that the heire in speciall taile was remitted and the second wife being now Demandant not dowable Mountague would haue demurred and disâ—â—ssed the â—ury but the Iustices were cleare in opinion that the â—ury ought to 〈◊〉 for the Demandant because their charge was only vpon the issue viz. whether the Baron had euer â—eiâ—in of such â—state that thâ— wife might haue dower And they were not to â—â—gâ—â—d the Remitter but onely to looke to the generall issue giuen them in charge But if the speâ—iâ—ll matter had 〈◊〉 pleaded the Demandant must nâ—â—dâ— haue â—éene â—arred for if he which makes a feoffement with condition to râ—â—nter for the condition broken and then in a Writ of dâ—â—er brought by thâ—feâ—â—â—â—â—s wiâ—â— hee will plead ne vnques â—â—iâ—â—â— quâ— dower it shall be found against him Knighâ—ly therefore would haue the spâ—â—iall matter found by the Iury and a verdict at large but the Iustâ—ces would not consent Yet â—empore Edw. 1. There was a case that the Baron discontinued his wiâ—es 〈◊〉 and died his wife recouered against the discontinue and he died the discontinues wife brought a Writ of Dower against the woman Recouâ—rer and she pleaded the generall issue ne vnques â—eisi que dower la puit All this matter was found â—y â—peâ—iall verâ—â—â—â— and â—udgement giâ—â—n vpon the issue 〈◊〉 foolishly â—â—ynâ—d that the Demandant should recoâ—er Dower which shee should neuer haue done had the 〈◊〉 â—éene good Sâ—â— and marke well this case and 21. Edw. â— fol. 60. and the â—â—se 28 Aâ—s pl. 4. SECT XIV Recouerie against the husband 14. H. 4. 33. IN action of Dower the Tenant pleaded a recouery in Assise against the husband iudgement si action c. the Demandant said her husband was seised c. and married her and infeofed the Tenant and afterward disseised him against whom the Tenant recouered in Assise the Baron died she prayed to bee indowed The Tenant said he was seised till by the Baron disseised against whom hee recouered by Assise sans câ—o that the Baron was seised before the disseisin que dower la puit the Demandant said seised before the disseisen que dower la puit Likewise 47. Edw. 3. 13. the Baron makes a feofment and ousteth the feofée the feofée recouers in assize the baron dieth now in a writ of Dower if the feoffée plead recouery in assize the widdow cannot â—alâ—â—â—â—â— the recouery but she may plead that long time before it c. her husband was seised que dower la puit and the Defendant contra 12. H. 4. 20. 21. The Tenant said he brought a Formedone against the husband which Writ hanging he shewed to the husband a dâ—ed of intailment whereupon presently he rendred the land in pâ—is to the Tenant which entred and now auâ—rreth the entailâ— Iudgement si action Thiâ—â— said the Statute was si vir reddat aduersario suo de plenâ— Iusticiarii adiudicent mulieri dotem but he and the whole Court agréed that rendring in pais doth not defeat meâ—â—â— estates of them which were neither parties nor priuy to the rendring and therefore they awarded the woâ—â—â— should recouer Dower Hanke said fée simple might not be rendered without liuery and seisin and where there is Lord and Tenant the Tenant may not surrender to his Lord Of falsifying of recoueries I haue spoken already Note If land bee recouered in value against the husband because of warranty made by his Ancestors the widdow shall haue Dower of those lands notwithstanding for if the Baron had aliâ—ned the land before voucher it should not haue beene rendred in value Consequently therefore the womans title is more ancient than the vouchers which beginneth but the day of vouching By Fâ—â—zh in his Abridgemâ—nt Dower 129. And his â—atâ— â—re 150. d. SECT XV. Ne vnques accouple c. SOmetime the vnlawfulnesse of marriage is pleaded in barre of Dower As 39. Edw. 3. 15. the Tenant pleaded the Demandant was first married to A and hée liuing she married B. of whoâ—e dowâ—ent she claimeth A. being still aliue this was holdâ—n no good pleading and therefore he added â—ssâ—â—t nient accouple in loyall matrimony The entry was only ne vnques accouple c. and a Writ awarded to the Bishop to certifie but for all such pleas deduced at length by old Writers as stand vpon the inualidity of marriage I will refâ—rre widdowes to that which is gone before of marriage and diuorce The pleas also of vnder 9. yéeres of age of attainder of non tenure ioyntenure or seuerall tenure I will not tarry on them 39. Ed. 1. fol. 4. A woman brought Dower against twâ— by seuerall precipes and one of them prayed â—yd of the other as parceners so that it appeareth that seuerall tenaâ—cie is a good plea in action of Dower Contra in Assise Brooke 99. SECT XVI Plea that tâ—e Baron is yeâ— aliue THe Writ de dote vnde nihil habet affords another eâ—ception against Dower because it saith quondâ—â— viri sui for though the fundamentall cause of dower be matrimony quoad le title yet as to the possession a woman cannot claime it till matrimony be dissolued therefore by Fitzherbert if the Baron take habit of religion the wife shall not be endowed till the husband be dead re vera yet by Britton it is issuable whether the Baron be entred into religion or no and that issue shall be tried by the Ordinary and iudged according to his certificat â—ut when the deforcer will barre Dower by â—lâ—a that the husband is yet aliue if the widdow reply he is dead the proofe regularly belongs to the Plaintiffe But if the Defendant say the husband is in plein vy ceo est prist auerrer he must proue his aâ—erâ—ent and sometime â—oth parties shall be heard to make their prâ—â—e which if it â—e aâ—â—â—e strong on either â—â—â—e the Deâ—andant may haue iâ—dgâ—ment oâ—â—eisiâ— finding surety such as the Court shall â—ward to resâ—ort if hâ—r husband hereafter â—ee brought into Court the â—aâ—d with the issues and proâ—â—â—s therâ—â—â— iâ— tâ—e interim recoâ—â—â—d But if the matter be doubtfull and the womaâ—â—aâ—â—ot â—â—â—â—e such surety the seisen shall râ—â—â—â—â—e where iâ— is and tâ—â— plea in suspence to be renewed pâ—â—summons as occasion shall serue Britton fo 25. SECT XVII Iudgement IVdgement in a Writ of Dower is framed according to the substance of the title and circumstance of the pleading It is touched aboue when or how a woman shall recouer dammages by sâ—râ—ise that the husband dyed
vita If the assignment of this Dower be sans fait it is no barre or conÌ„clusiou but a Remitter otherwise if it be by Deed or Record If a man giue lands to a woman to marrie with him and after espousals he alieneth the same land and dieth she may haue a Cui in vita And note that the gift or demise alleaged in a Cui in vita is trauersable Thus much Fitzherbert 48. Ed. 3. 8. In a Cui in vita claiming to hold sibi 〈…〉 de corpore without shewing of whose donation the 〈◊〉 pleaded to the Writ and it was abated But in a Quod â—â— de 〈…〉 the Demandant needs not shew by whoâ—e gift she claimeth 49. Ed. 3. fol. â—9 The Writ was Qua 〈…〉 sib 〈…〉 W. N. The tenant said she neuer had any â—â—ing of the gift of W. N. per Belknap the answer was not good for were the gift from one or other if the husband aliened she might haue the action and the Writ may be Quâ—m elamaâ— vt ius haereâ—â—aâ—em though she purchased the lands adiorâ—atâ—r The latter point is affirmed 7. H. 4. fol 5 per Littleton accorded but for the first vide 50. Ed. â— fol. 6. in a Cui in viâ—a quam clâ—mat â—enerâ—â—x dimissione per termino viâ—ae â— N. it was admitted vpon argument a good answer per â— uâ—iam for where one maketh title it â—ught to be true And there finde sur release made to Baron and Fâ—me and to the herres of the baron by I. N. was holden no demise for it must be supposed the baron and feme were in possession tempore finis And Persy said it had béene adiudged if a woman claimed in her Writ ad termiâ—um vitae if it were found she had estate taile the Writ should abate So likewise if a woman claime by lease for terme of life per A. and it was sound that A. made no lease shée had now no estate and consequently hath none action Likewise said Kirton if in Assâ—ze of nouell disseism the plaintiffe make his title by fâ—offâ—â—nt of A. and is found that A. infâ—offed him not but B. did hée shall bee barred in the Assize for where a man maketh his title vpon a point which is boâ—nd against him it cannot be intenâ—â—â— that he hath a better title and there he shall not haue aduantage of any other 39. H. 6. fol. 38. In a Cui in vita quod clamat esse ius suâ—â—â— ex dâ—no I. which infeoffed tâ—â— Demandant and her fate husband with declaration that they were seised as of Franktenement and lâ—e les explees as teâ—ants for life c. Priâ—oâ— said That in cases speciall this Writ ought to make mention of whose gift lease or demise the Demandant claimeth as Ad â—erminum vitae ex dono I. S. or Sibi haeredibus ex dono I. S. But in demand of Fée â—â—â—nple it is enough to say Qâ—â—m â—lâ—mâ—t vt â—us haeâ—â—ditatem without shewing by whose gift or feâ—ffment 7. H. 7. fol. 2. If this Writ â—e againsâ—â—aron and feme for lands holden in the wiues right it must bee in quod vxor ingressa est per I. N. non quod vir vâ—or ingressi sunt per I. N. Sâ—CT XXIV west 2. Case 3. 2. Eâ— 4. foâ— 13. IF a man be seisod in right of his wife and recouerie is had against them by default the woman after his death may haue a Cui in vita but not a Quod ei deforceat per Moyle Iustice It séemes that at Common Law this writ of Cui in vita was onely granted vpon actuall discontinuance by the baron for West 2. casâ—â—â— iâ— Qâ—ando vir amiserit per defalcum tenementum quod â—uit in vxoris suae duruâ—â— fuit quod vxor post mortem viri non habuâ—rit aliud recupâ—rare quam per breue de recto propter quod Dâ—minus Rex â—â—atuit vt mulier post morâ—â—in â—iri haâ—eat râ—â—â—pâ—raâ—â— pâ—n breâ—ede ingressu cui â—â—â—a in vita c. But in this case if the tenâ—â—â— can proue that hee had right on his side when hee recouered Muâ—er â—iâ—il capit per â—reueâ— Nâ—tâ— also by the way that this heat wâ—â—s Si vir se absentaveriâ— â—â—luerit â—â—â— vxoris 〈◊〉 defendâ—re vâ—d si in vlta vxoris reddâ—â—◠〈◊〉 â—â— vâ—â—â— anâ—◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 paraâ—a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 deâ—â—â—dete 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to further for recoueries If Iudgement of â—or eiudger be giuen against Baron and Fâ—uie this is not void as soone as the Baâ—on is dead but vâ—ydable by error for the woman cannot haue a Cui in vita 〈◊〉 fol. 2â—â— A 〈◊〉 â—y 〈◊〉 â—◠〈◊〉 alienation â— and therefore vpon suâ—â— a â—â—coverie as soone â—â— the husband is dead the woman may haue a Câ—â—â—â—â—â—â— by the Common Law 4 Ed. 2. â—rook◠〈◊〉 vitâ— 18. If a râ—coâ—eriâ— be â—â—â— by 〈◊〉 Wâ—â—â— of waâ—â—e thâ— wâ—â—e cannot â—â—uâ—â—◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 either because the recouerie is not méerely by default or else because the 〈◊〉 of waste hath no demand of land quaere if shée shall haue a Quod eâ— deâ—oâ—ceat 9. Ed. 4. 16. If Baron and Feme be impleaded by one which hath good title and the Baron confesse the action the woman hath no remedie Yet the Statute is that vpon rendring by the Baron the wife may be receiued â—â— But if Baron and Feme be receiued vpon default of tenant for life where the reuersiâ—n is in the wife the Baron cannot confesse the action for hée must be 〈◊〉 Ad ius 〈◊〉 defâ—â—â—endum 7. Ed. 4. 17. SECT XXV The Sur â—ui in vita IF she which hath cause to bring a Cui in vita of Fée simple lands die before she hath sued c. her heire shall haue â— Sur â—â—â— in vita But if the wiues lands which the husband aliened were in state of Fee taile and the wife neâ—â—◠〈◊〉 her heire must sue a 〈◊〉 in disâ—onder and not a 〈◊〉 â—â—â—â—â—â— for though both these 〈◊〉 hée the children of the ancient Common Law and were before West 2. Yea and this latter Writ was maintainable for lands giuen to the mother in francke marriage or to the heires of her body which at the first was Féâ—â—â—â—pte yet when 〈◊〉 made 〈◊〉 â— taile it did also expressely set downe â— Writ whereby the heire should recouer such estates The Sur câ—â—â—n vita for it is no â—ore but Praecipe quod 〈◊〉 c. quod 〈◊〉 esse iâ—â— haeâ—â— ditateÌ„ suâ—â— in quod non habuit ingressum nisi per Eâ— and so in the Cui oâ— in the 〈◊〉 And the Aâ—â—t and Néeâ—◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in it vpon alienatioâ— made by the husband of their common Ancestor or vpon recouerie had against â—â—â— and her If a second husband alienhis wiues Fée siâ—ple landâ— and she dieth the issue by her first husband 〈◊〉 â—uâ—â— Sur cui in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 these â—â—nd husband still liuing if hée were neuer intituled to be Tâ—nant by the Curtâ—sie But
Hill 18 E. 2. it was held by Herle Iustice that the Writ lieth well enough for him in remainder And Tri. 31. E 1. the heire in taile maintained a writ of entry in Consimili casu vpon alienation made by tenant le curtesie SECT XXXI The Writ of Entrie ad communem legem THe Writ of Entry at Common law is giuen in Case where Tenant in Dower or per curtesie or for life doth alien in fée or in taile or for life c. now if the Tenant which aliened doe dye hec in the reuersion must take this Writ of Entry ad communem legem which is very like the former Writs and may be in the per cui post If a woman recouer Dower alien and dye the Writ of Entry ad communem legem must make mention of the recouery And if Tenant by the curtesie aliâ—â— in fée and dye he in the reuersion if he be heire in fée simple may sue this Writ or his Assise of Moâ—â— dancester giuen by the Statute of Glocester ca. 3. If Tenant for life alien in fée and dye the Writs for him in reuersion are in diuers formes for if hee haue the reuersion by discent the Writ is in quod idem A. non habet ingressum nisi per C. câ—i D. pator vel antecessor of the Demandant cuius haeres c. demised c. But when the Demandant himselfe made the lease to him which aliened then the Writ is or may be Pâ—aecipe quod recidat c. omitting these words quod clomat vt ius haereditatem and note if Tenant for life alien in fee and dye hee in reuersion may chuse whether he will haue this writ or an ad terminum qui praeteriit If Tenant for life grant his estate and hee in reuersion grant his reuersion with Atturnement if now the Tenant which atturned alien in fée the grantée of the reuersion shall haue a Writ mentioning the grant and assignation c. SECT XXXII More of forfeitures and how a particular Tenant may forfeit his estate without alienation NOte If Tenant for life lease the land to I. S. for terme of life of I. S. which dyeth the first leasâ—e still liuing hee shall not haue the land againe because hee leased more than was in him and therefore hee in the reuersion shall haue it But if two be seised for life the inheritance in fée to one of them and ioyne in a lease for life and the leasee dyeth they shall bee ioynt tenants againe ê‘ Littleton 13. E. 4. fol. 4. Because hée which had the fée was priuy to the lease and so the other gained no new reuersion It is yet further to be vnderstood both that he in reuersion may enter vpon alienations made by particular Tenants vt supia to his disinheritance without suing the aboue mentioned Writs And also that there are sundry other forfeitures to the Reuersioner besides expresse alienations which I would haue widdowes to take héed of 6. Edw. 3. fol. 17. In Action of waste by an Infant against Tenant by his fathers demise he pleades that the father confirmed his estate to haue and to hold to him and his heires in fee by his déed shewed to the Court Iudgement si c. It was said for verity that if the claime were found false the heire might enter Page 64. in Fitzh And if a reuersion bee granted by fine and the conuse brings a quid iuris clamat against the Tenant for life which pleadeth that shee hath estate in taile by deuise in Testament from the Commissors if it bee found by verdict that shee hath but estate for life that estate is forfeited Quod vide Plowd fol. 212. in Saunders in Fremans Case where the entry for the conusée is consideratum est pro seisina reddâ—t praed cum partium versus c. occasionae clam ' placit praedict ' forisfact ' habend ' si voluerit persequatur ac etiam quod finis praed si voluerit ingrossetur Plesingtons Case 6. R. 2. was this A man made a lease for yéeres and granted further by Indenture if he aliened the reuersion or dyed within the teâ—me that the leassée should haue francketenement and liuery was made the fée simple was granted by fine c. and in a quid iuris clamat the leassee claimed francketâ—nement iudgement was giuen that the cognisée might enter for a forfeiture and that the fine should be engrossed si voluerit Sée 3. 4. Eliz. Dier 209. in a like case the iudgement was not quod quaerens recuperet seisinam but quod prosequatur pro seisina si voluerit finis ingrossetur c. SECT XXXIII The Statute of 11. H. 7. cap 20. THe Common Law restrictiue of it selfe and helped something by the Statute of Glocester was sufficient a great while to bridle women from making alienations for any land that they held in Dower or Ioynture as arguments of their owne good deserts and testimonies of their husbands loue But time which made the art of fencing more fine than it was at the first when Combattants fought all at head and shoulders and it was greater shame to strike vnder the girdle than it is now made law also more subtile than in the beginning it was when lands went altogether or for the most part by liuery of seisin And women witty of themselues instructed by crafty men grew cunning at the last that they could alien lands holden for life or in taile to whom they listed in fée And hee which suffereth disinheritance should not easily helpe himselfe by Writ of Entry either ad communem legem or in casu prouiso for remedy whereof was made this seuere statute in effect as followeth 11. H. 7. If any woman which hath had or hereafter shall haue any estate in Dower or for life or in taile ioyntly with her husband or only to her selfe or to her vse in any Manors Lands Tenements or other Hereditaments of the inheritance or purchase of her husband or giuen to the husband and wife in taile or for terme of life by any Ancestors of the husband or by any other person seised to the vse of the husband or of his Ancestors and haue or shall hereafter being sole or with any other after taken to husband discontinued or discontinue aliened released or confirmed alien release or confirme with warranty or by couin suffered or suffer any recouery of the same against them or any of them or any other seised to their vse or to the vse of either of them after the forme aforesaid that all such recoueries discontinuances alienations releases confirmations and warranties so had and made and from henceforth to be had and made be vtterly void c. And that it shall be lawfull to euery person and persons to whom the interest title or inheritance after the decease of the said woman of the said manors lands or tenements or other hereditaments being discontinued aliened or suffored
of the Obligée And if I bee bound to C. that A. shall marry B. before Easter If I marry B. and our Espousals continue till Easter my bond is forfeited Similiter If C. marry B. or if A. and B. cannot marrie because one of them dieth or wareth mad before the day I finde none other cause in our Yéere-bookes alleaged why things may not passe by gift betwéene Baron and feme saue only vnitie of person But vndoubtedly the restraint springeth from a politique consideration rather to bréed cherish and maintaine the vnity then in iudging of an impossibility because of the vnitie But the Ciuill Law vir non potest dare vxori ne foeminae amorem coniugalcm in quaestu habeant prohibenter inter coniuges donationes quia silicerct coniugibus inuicem donare matrimonia fierint venalia saepe distraherentur c. And because it would amount to arguing inter coniuges there is a restraint by that law Ne priuignus dare queat nouercae vel nouerca priuigno What if the Matrimonie be inualidum legibus non consistens yet non valet inter coniuges putatiuos facta donatio ne melioris sint conditionis quam illi qui recte faciont But a gift to a plaine Concubine is good enough vnlesse the giuer be a Soldier By old Iohn Bracton lib. 2. ca 5. Non valent donationes inter virum vxorem non enim poterit vir dare vxori nec e conuerso constante Matrimonio quia huiusmodi donationes prohibitae sunt inter tales personas nec infraudem facere possint constitutioni veluti si Maritus donet extraneae personae ea mente vt redonet in vita viri vel post mortem hee maketh his reason in the 14. Chapter Si tales donationes fieri possint ob amorem inter virum foeminam posset alter eorum egestare inopia premi But at this day though lands cannot passe betwixt Baron and Feme right out by plaine liuery or bargaine yet in the obliquitie of fines recoueries and vses there is an Expedite transporting of Inheritance betwixt them to the vndoing perhaps of the partie whose Lands are transferred and auferred with not so much as coniugall loue alwayes in recompence SECT IIII. In what sort things may passe betwixt Baron and Feme LAnds cannot passe from the Baron by feoffement to put the state from him immediately to the wife though he were infeoffed to that intent and vpon such a condition But one man may infeoffe another vpon condition to infeoffe the wife of the Feoffor whatsoeuer Bracton say and the condition good Also a feoffement fine or recouery may be made knowledged or suffered to the vse of her and her heyres which is wife to the Feoffor Conusor or sufferer c. And as I may make another man the instrument to conuey lands to my wife so may I be the meanes to conuey Lands to my wife from another man for by Letters of Atturney-ship I may deliuer seisen of Lands to my Wife for another and the feoffement shall be good by Parkins 41. And a man may deuise in his last Will and Testament either by the custome or by the Statute 32. H. 8. Lands to his Wife in fée fée-taile for life or for yeares because this taketh none effect till the Couerture be dissolued It is said in Scolasticus case If I deuise that he shall haue greene acre after the death of my wife my wife shall haue estate for life by the intent c. And although a wife by the generall rule hath no will but her Husbands and all Testaments of a feme-couert to deuise any Mannors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments are ineffectuall by expresse declaration of 34. Henrici 8. capite 5. soeuer be the courtesie among Dames of honor a womans name of dignitie changeth with the degree of her husband and of such women as haue not their honor by birth but acquire that by Marriage the rule of Law taketh order Si mulier nobilis nupserit ignoblem desinet esse nobilis when she taketh a second husband But what though the scrupulositie of the Common pleas were obserued throughout the Realme that Esquires Ladies should be no Ladies in Court and Country wherevnto I will neuer giue voyce what inequality were in this depressing shall not likewise a Knights widdow marrying with a Baron or Earle as be much exalted verament yet you see the dignitie hangeth meerely on the male side carrying the scepter of Wedlocke SECT VI. Touching seruitude NOw touching the state of fréedome or bondage Littleton saith that if a free-man marry a bond-woman the Lord cannot seise her but there is remedie by action for taking her sans gree or licence Fitzherbert in his liberâ—are probanda agreeth 78. G. that she should be fréed perpetually But the Law seemeth to be otherwise And so you may find the opinion of Doct. Stud. fo 139 b. And that indeed it is no more but a Temporarie priuiledge and exemption from seisure of her Lord during time of couerture for if the Seigniour of a Mannor marrie his Niefe regardant the best authority that I can finde is that this Niefe is no more but shrined in the honour of her Lord if he die she shall haue no Dower but remaine still in her niefitie regardant to the Mannor And to say truth I perceiue not how a womans being married can in any sort be an infranchisement no not for a time it is no more but a sconsing or hiding of the seruitude Bracton saith elegantly manumission is a detection or laying open of the freedome which is a natura A womans liberty is free licence to doe what she list vnlesse shee be letted by force or by Law it is not restored to Niefe when she marrieth Marriage rather pulleth it from her which before was free When a Seignieur therefore marrieth with his bond-woman she must not turne her bumme to him and say heretofore my Lord I lay in your bed and now I lye in mine owne as the French Concubine said being married newly to her French Lord but let her bee burome and mindfull of her subiection for if this louing Seignior of hers die she may right well be an apparant Niefe againe to her owne sonne for ought that I know why not as well as causes may happen that the father to sonne or one sonne to another may be a villeine the case did happen 3. Ed. 3. that the villaine married his Lords mother and so the father in Law and the brother de demisank were villeines If a free woman marry a villeine her naturall freedome is not otherwise infringed then by subiection to her husband If the villeine purchase Lands and die before seisure made by the Lord the wife shall haue Dower But if a frée-woman seised in fee or fee-tails take a husband which is a villeine and die the Lord may enter vpon the husbands possession per le Courtesie or vpon the Issue being Tenants
pere he shall be fore-closed for the value of so much as is descended If after the Fathers death any heritage descend from the Father the Tenant shall recouer against him of the mothers seisin by a writt of indgement out of the rolles c. which the Iustices before whom the plea was pleaded shall grant to re-sommon the warrantie as hath béene accustomed in other cases where the voucher pleads â—iens a luy descenâ—râ— from him vpon whose deed he is vouched c. And in like sort the Issue of the sonne shall recouer by Writ of Cousinage aile or besaile In like manner the Wiues heyre shall not be barred after the death of his father and mother to demand by Writt of entry his mothers heritage which his father in her life time aliened dont nul fine est le uie in court le roy SECT XVII Mr. Littletons glosse vpon the Statute of Glocester BEfore the Statute saith M. Littleton if Tenant by the Courtesie did alien c. in fee with warrantie onely this after his discease should barre the Heyre for this was a collaterall warrantie before the Statute Since the Statute it is cleere that whether tenant by the Courtesie or tenant in the right of his wife doe alien the wiues heritace or marriage by his deede in pais which warrantie leauing none assets it is no barre to the heyre But what if the Baron alien by fine leuied in the Kings court with warrantie shall this barre the heyre without any thing descended in value Newton Chiefe Iustice of the Common place thought it should by implication of words for hee tooke dont nul fine c. to be a generall exception and therefore this alienation by fine with warrant to remaine a collater all warrantie as it was at Common Law But Littleton giueth his voyce with them of contrary opinion which thought it an obscure exposition to permit irreuocable alienation by Tenant in droit sa feme onely by his warranting concord without assetts when the Statute hath in the beginning taken it expresly from tenant by the Courtesie alienating by Feoffement Nul fine therefore is as much to say nul loyall fine rightfully leuied viz. a fine leuied by Baron and Feme for it is true that before this Statute was made and somewhat after it too there was no estate taile come into England A fine might then well and rightfully haue beene leuied by Baron Feme the Barons heire be bound with warrantie and the wiues heire barred for euer But now since the Statute if Baron and Feme had made a feoffement in fée by deede in the Countrey the womans heyre after decease of them both may haue a Writ of entry sur cui in vita for all the husbands warranty And this Statute of Glocester had left a fine no more force then a feoffement here if the finall exception had not beene for when it comes with insemente in mesme le manner giuing a writt of entry to auoyd the alienation made by the father in the mothers life time this might be extended perhaps to a fine leuied by them both for where the Baron and feme doth alien by fine its true that the Baron doth alien Lest therefore a fine leuied by Baron and Feme should be thought to be inféeblished this exception of a fine was necessary and it is to be intended of a fine loyall For when the Iustices know once that tenant in right of his wife commeth to leuie a fine onely in his owne name they will not receiue it SECT XXI Dyers Exposition LIttleton in this discourse seemeth to speake as if hee tooke a warrant without assets made by tenant per Courtesie or iure vxoris to bee no collaterall warrantie now a dayes whereat I maruell A man may haue a veyne cut vnder his eare that shall disable him from performing a great part of manhood but he shall be a man notwithstanding and a horse may be so foundred that he shall neither well goe or stand and yet a horse still So this kinde of warrantie gelt or foundered by Statute remaines collaterall nomine specie Dyer is so fo 148. at Common Law saith he garrantie by tenant per le courtesie was collaterall vncore est come ieo intend But it it is no barre in Mortdancester aiel or cousinage without assets in fée simple descended ie facto whereas before the Statute it was brought to bee intended and supposed and this Statute is taken strictly for the law at this day is come ieo intend if the heyre doe not enter vpon the aliene of his father in vita patris that he shall be bound and barred of his entry by the warrantie If the Father be disseised and release with warrantie the heyre shall be barred without assets both of entry and action also for this is none alienation by tenant by the Courtesie In the last point of the Statute of Glocester for alienation by the husband in vita vxoris c. if he alien the purchase of his wife with warranty this is out of the Statute for heritage or marriage is not intended purchase by her So much my Lord Dyer note that both he and Littleton stand vpon the word Marriage which indeed is not in the letter of the Statute SECT XXII The Statute of 32. H. 8. ca. 28. WEe haue passed the pillers not of Hercules but of Littleton in the Husbands power ouer his wiues Inheritance now let vs looke plus vltra with Columbus King Henry the eight and the Parliament ordained in the yeare aboue specified That all Leases of Mannors Lands Tenements or Hereditaments hereafter to bee made by Indenture sealed for yeares or for life by any person or persons being of the age of one and twenty yeares and seised in fee-simple or féetaile in the right of themselues their Churches or wiues or iointly with their wiues of any estate of Inheritance made before Couerture or after shall be good c. against the Lessors their wiues heyres and Successors c. according to the estate comprised in such Indenture of lease in like manner and forme as if the Lessors and euery of them at time of the Lease making had beene seised in pure fée-simple to her owne onely vses prouiso that this act extend not to Leases made of Mannors Lands Tenaments or Hereditaments being in the hands of any fermor or fermors by vertue of any old Lease vnlesse the old Lease be expired surrendred or ended within one yeare next after making of the new Lease nor shall extend to any grantée of reuersion c nor to any Lease of any Mannors Lands Tenements c. which hath not beene commonly let to ferme or occupied by fermors by space of 20. yeares next before such Lease nor to any Lease made without impeachment of waste nor to any Lease to be made for aboue 21. yeares or thrée liues at the most from the day of the making thereof And vpon euery
the Statute as also what lands are subiect to the Statute as also what lands are subiect to seisure aswell of the husbands lands as of the wiues If that were reason saith Fitzherbert a womans inheritance might be seised too Et semble a moy the King cannot grant marriage of his widdowes as he may of his wards for a widdow may remaine sole without penalite or paying for it by Mag. Chart. cap. 7. But Stamford includeth that a widdow endowed oâ— lands holden in capite by the Kings Committee or husbands heire though vnsworne is not freed from marriage sans licence for she is presently as soone as she is endowed tenant to the King and not to the heire which is in reuersion yet only the heire is he which shall haue action of waste against her but if trespasse bee done vpon the ground she may haue a writ out of Chancerie supposing entrie vpon the Kings possession And Auowrie to bee made by the King resteth onely vpon her as holdeth Wood 1. H. 7. fol. 17. and 4. H. 7. 1. Now note that Endowment in Chancerie is of such strength that be it by wrong or by right it cannot be auoyded by plea without suit in Chancerie And if it bee too little the woman must stand in her owne harmes that hath once attempted it in Chancerie bee shee within aâ—e or of full age as appeares 18. Ed. 3. fol. 29. If any office bee trauersed because the land is holden not of the King but of some other Lord who therefore hath an Ouster le maine vna cum exitibus yet Dower which is already assigned remaineth vndefeated till another suit be made in Chancerie to auoid it Yet in this case because Admeasurement is no preiudice to the King of whom the land is not holden the Lord that tendreth trauerse may haue a Writ of Admeasurement at yâ— Common Law And the heire may haue Admeasurement of Dower assigned by his Ancestor But an Abator cannot haue Admeasurement neither can Gardian in fait haue Admeasurement vpon assignment by Gardian in droit nor if the heire were at full age at his Ancestors death and died his heire being within age can the Gardian haue Admeasurement but where a woman is endowed in Chancerie and afterward the heire or some other for the King surmiseth eâ—cesse of value it may bée admeasured beginning with Scire facias as Fitzherbert hath taught supra and fol. 249. â— If the husband had l 〈…〉 in diuers Counties by reason whereof diuers writs of diem clausit extremum were awarded after his death into euerie of those Counties the widdow cannot be endowed till such time as all the writs be returned into Chancery If after she is once endowed in Chancerie her Dower be recouered from her by any title she hath no remedie but to remoue the record of this recouerie into Chancerie and then vpon the first record which sheweth that she was endowed and vpon this other of recouerie she shall haue Scire facias reciting both the records against him which is tenant of the two parts to reseise them into the Kings hands and so to bee newly endowed but not to recouer any dammages though dammages were recouered against her Lib. 43. Assisar Pl. 32. for by the latter part of the Statute Prerogatiue cap. 4. It séemeth the King hath lost his prerogatiue and that he is bound by West 1. cap. 22. Note that woman Ioynt purchaser with her husband is not within this Law to fine for her marriage when she becomes a widdow say I therefore well fare a Ioynture SECT VIII Suit for Dower at the Common Law THus we haue séene how and when a widdow muâ—â— fâ—â— for Dower in the Châ—â—â—erâ—â— viz. when either her husband died the 〈…〉 tenant in capâ—te or by â—nights seruice his heire vnder age or otherwise tenant to some other â—hole lands are in the Kings hands by vacancie or nonage of the heire But if the husband which held in Socage or by â—nights seruice not of the King did giue or alien any manâ—â—r of way his lands or were disseised of them or died sâ—isâ—â— of them The widdow if by simple demand she cannot obtaine her Dower to bee assigned her may haue a wâ—â—t of Dower Vnde nihil habet at the Common Law against him which is tenant of the Franktenement by the old Nat. breuium this writ is maintainable against him which hath possession of the land by what manner soeuer or against the Gardian in Chiualrie in this or like forme Rex Vâ—cecomiti c. command A. to render to B. which was the wise of C. â—er reasonable Dower quae ad cam contingit de libero â—enemento quoâ— fuit praedict C. sometime her late husband in D. vnde niâ—iâ—â—abet vnde queritur quod A. ei defortiat c. nisi fecerit B. fecerit tâ— securum de clamore prosequendo c. summoneas A. vt sit apud WestmÌ„ ostensurus If the Dower were ad ostium Ecclesiae or ex assensu patris or otherwise there is mention made of it in the writ In London there may be a writ from the King to the Maior and Sheriffes in these words Quod Iusticietis A. quod iuste â—â—ne delatione secundum consuetudinem ciuitatis nostrae London redd ' B. quae fuit vxor C. rationabilem dotem c. Et Iusticietis D. quod iuste c. whereby appeares that a widdow in London may haue a writ of Dower against seuerall tenents by seuerall Iusticies as well as at the Common Law seuerall Precipes against seuerall tenants all in one writ the Processe in the Common Place is summons Grand cape pettie cape in the Common Place this writ of Dower vnde nihil habet must be returned into the Kings Court Et per grand reason saith Britton cap. 10. 4. For if two or more women should striue euerie of them affirming her selfe to be the lawfull wife of him which is dead not minding to be buried with him as is the corse in India but to get a third of his lands This must be tried by Certificate from the Bishop vnto whom if any but the King should write for the deciding of debate it might fall out to be all in vaine because none hath power but the King to compell the Bishop to make Certificate In the next Chapter Britton sheweth that if the Tenant vouch to warranty one which appeareth according to summons the Plea shall proceed betwixt the Plaintiffe the Warrantor or Vouchée the Tenant keeping seisen till the Warrantie be determined Then if the Garrantie cannot be denied nor the womans right disproued if that which she demandeth were certainly assigned to her for Dower from her husband shee shall recouer against the Tenant Et le renant le value But if the demand bee of no other than reasonable Dower the woman shall recouer in value against the Warrantor and the Tenant shall hold his land in peace If so be