in Banco Regis BY the Law it is not sufficient that the testator be of memory when he makes his Will to answer to ordinary and usuall questions but he ought to have a disposing memory so as he is able to make disposition of his Lands with understanding and reason And this is such a memory which is called safe and perfect memory otherwise a Prohibition lyeth at the common Law generally to stay all the proceedings in the spirituall Court as the probate of the Will c. untill this Suggestion be tryed at the common Law Reades Case 42. Eliz. banco regis fo 24. IN trespasse the Defendant makes Title for that A. W. was seised in fee and leased to him the Plaintiffe maketh title by discent and traverseth the Lease and good for it may be true that A. W. was seised and yet that a discent was cast to the Plaintiffe therefore the Lease is most materiall to be traversed Helyars Case 41. Eliz. banco regis fo 24. IN a Replevin the Defendant avoweth by grant of a terme by I. A. to S. from whom he claimeth the Plaintiffe pleads in barre that I. A. married T. who by a former deed granted the terme to the plaintiffe and traverseth the grant made to S. and vitious for he who claimeth by the first assignement shall not traverse the second but he who claimes by the second shall traverse the first But the first Feoffee shall traverse the last feoffment and the last feoffee shall not traverse the first feoffement because fee may be gained by disseisin after the first feoffement but a Lease for yeares caanot Ruddocks case 41. Eliz. banco regis fo 25. IN replevyn against six the Plaintiffe recovers the Defendants bring error the Plaintiffe pleads the release of one of them not good Where diverse are to recover a personall thing the release or default of one barres all but not where they are to discharge themselves of a personalty if they are compelled to joyne as in error and attaint otherwise in Outlary because not compellable to joyne for where they are to discharge themselves they have no joynt interest and although they shall have their damages againe it shall be intended that they paid them of their severall goods otherwise it may be doubted if Execution had beene made of goods which they have joyntly Sharps case 42. Eliz. fo 26. com banco IF a man make a feoffement in Fee or a Lease for life and say to the Feoffee being eyther on the Lands of within the view Enter into this Land and enjoy the same according to this deed c. this is a good livery but the delivery of the deede upon the Lands without any further ceremony or saying doth not amount to a livery Throughgoods Case 9. Jacob in the nineth Booke The actuall delivery of a Writing sealed to the party without any words is a good livery but not a livery of seisin although the Party be upon the ground If I deliver a deede unto the feoffee or Lessee of the Messuage mentioned in the deede in the name of seisin of the said Messuage and of all the Lands tenements c. in the same contained or other such like words without any ceremony or act done this is a good seisin The Case of Souldiers 43. Eliz. fo 27. THe Statutes of 7. H. 7. cap. 1. and 3. H. 8. cap. 5. against Souldiers who run away are acts perpetuall for the word King includeth all his succession and a gift to the King inureth to his Successors Vicount Mountagues Case 43. Eliz. in Scaccar fol. 27. VIcount M. with License of the K. suffers a recovery to B. and D. to uses with power of revocation and limitting of new and revokes and limits new uses the King shall have no fine for alienation 1. Resolved if the King doth license to alien to one and alienation is made to the use of another the King shall not have a fine for although that the King was not informed of his Tenant yet the use is executed by the Statute of 27. H. 8. which can doe no wrong and the proviso in the Statute that a fine shall be paid for executing of uses is to be intended of uses raised by Covenant or declared upon a Fine Feoffement c. when no License of alienation is obtained 2. Although that by revocation and new limittation of uses the tenant of the King be altered yet no fine is due because all ariseth out of the estate of B. and D. which was made with License Greenes Case 44. Eliz. banco regis fol. 29. TEnant for life of a Mannor to which an advowson is appendant the remainder in Fee to I. S. presenteth one who at the suite of the Tenant for life is deprived for not reading the Articles but no notice is given to the Patron the Queene by lapse presents the Defendant Tenant for life and his incumbent die he in the remainder presents the Plaintiffe Greene who recovereth 1. Resolv Although the Patron were party to the Suite and so had notice yet lapse shall not incurre without notice given by the ordinary as the Statute speakes and the notice ought to be speciall that he did not reade the Articles and therefore was deprived and generall notice is not sufficient 2. The Church is voyd Ipso facto by the Statute of 13. Eliz. without deprivation 3. If the Queene present Ratione Lapsus where shee is Patron this is voyd A fortiori when shee had no title at all 4. The Patron is not put to a Quare impedit by presenting him who read not the Articles nor by Collation but by Collation of him who had right to Collate the Patron is put out of possession 5. The Queene may be put out of possession of an advowson because it is transitory but shee cannot be put to a Writ of right of advowson for none can gaine the Inheritance from her by wrong Boothies Case 3. Jacobi com banco fol. 30. THe condition of an Obligation is to deliver an Obligation to the Obligee and to acknowledge satisfaction it must be done in convenient time for acts transitory to be done to the Obligee although a place be appointed shall be done in convenient time and acts of their nature locall ought to be performed in convenient time if concurrence of the Obligor and Obligee be not requisite Also here the delivery of the bond being transitory and the acknowleding satisfaction such an act as may be performed in the absence of the Obligee they ought to be done in convenient time without request but if the Act be locall and their concurrence necessary the Obligor had time during his Life if not hastened by request If the concurrence of the Obligor and a stranger be necessary it ought to be done in convenient time if concurrence of the Obligee and a stranger it ought to be hastened by request And alwaies if the Act to be done is not for the benefit of the Obligee
he lost his Common the Jury found that the Defendant did not put in the Beasts but they of themselves depastured there 1. The Jury have found the substance of the issue for the Plaintiffe the depasturing there and it is not materiall if he put them not there 2. This Action lyeth for the Commoner for he may distreine damage feasant and it may be that with strong hand he is hindered to distreine and so if he shall not have this Action he is remedilesse 2. A Commoner who had freehold in the common shall have an Assize Ergo a Copy-holder shall have this Action 3. The wrong ought to be so great that the Commoner loose his Common as a Master shall not have an Action for beating his Servant without losse of his Service and it appeareth not to the Court that there are more Commoners then he and if there be yet an Action lyeth because each had private damage and it is not like to a common Nusans which shall be punished onely in a Leete if there be not speciall damage but be the Trespasse never so little the Lord may have an Action of Trespasse The Lord Sanchars Case 10. Jacobi fol. 117. For procuring the Murther of John Turnor Mr. of Defence 1. REsolv That a Baron of Scotland shall be tried by Commons of England 2. The Indictment of the accessory in one County to a Fellony in another County by the Statute of 2. E. 6. c. 24. shall recite that the fellony was done in the other County for an Indictment is no direct affirmation of the fact 3. The Justices of the Kings Bench are within these words of the Statute Justices of Gaole-delivery or Oyer and Terminer for they are the supreame Judges of Gaole-delivery 4. The Lord Sanchar cannot be in the Terme-time Arraigned in Midd. before Justices of Oyer and Terminer because Justices of Oyer and Terminer shall not sit in the same County where the Kings Bench is but the principalls were Arraigned in L. in the Terme-time because this is another County 5. There needs not be 15. dayes for the returne of the Venire facias upon an Indictment in the same County where the Kings Bench is otherwise in another County 6. Because there is no direct proofe that the Lord S. commanded one of the principalls but that he associated himselfe to one who was commanded the best way is to arraigne him as accessory to him whom he commanded but if he be Indicted as accessory to two and found accessory to one of them this is good The word Appeale in the Statute of W. 1. c. 14. is to be intended generally Viz. By Indictment by Writ or Bill c. and attainders is to be intended upon any such accusation Ergo if upon any such accusation the principall be attainted erroneously the accessory may be arraigned because the attainder is good untill it be reversed but if the Accessory be Hanged and after the Attainder against the principall is reversed the Heire of the Accessory shall be restored to all which his Father lost either by entry or Action By 5. H. 4. cap. 10. none shall be imprisoned by Justices of Peace but in the Common Gaole whereby it appeares that Justices of Peace offend who commit Fellons to the Counters in L. and other Prisons which are not Common Gaoles Cases in the Court of Wards Anthony Lowes Case 7. Jacobi fol. 122. A. L. Tenant of 59. Acres parcell of the Mannor of A. by chivalry and Suite of Court to B. whereof A. was parcell and both A. and B. were parcell of the Duchie of L. out of the County Palatine holden formerly of the King in Chivalry in Capite and of another House there holden of A. by fealty and rent H. 8. grants the rent by release to him and confirmeth his estate in the said Lands by fealty onely and grants to him the Mannor of A. Tenendum by fealty and rent It was Objected that when the King grants the Seigniory to his Tenant the ancient Seigniory is extinct and a new one that is best for the King created Viz. Chivalry 2. When he extinguisheth services parcell of the Mannor of A. this shall be holden as the Mannor of A. is that is by Chivalry But resolved that the 59. acres and house shall be holden by fealty onely and as to the said Objection the release of the King doth not extinguish service which is inseparable to a Tenure that is fealty but all others are gone and true it is when the K. grants and expresseth no tenure it shall be by Chivalry but when the Land moveth from a Subject and the Tenure is changed the new Tenure shall be as neere the ancient as may be as Feoffee of Tenant in Frankalmoigne shall hold by fealty onely and here although they grant the services yet he limits the grantee to doe fealty A Knights fee is not to be taken according to the quantity but the value of the Land as 20. l. per annum and a Hide of Land is as much as a Plough can Plough in a yeare Reliefe is the fourth part of the annuall value that is of a Knight five pound of a Baron a 100. Markes of an Earle 100. l. of a Marques 200. Markes of a Duke 200. l. The Eldest Sonne of E. 3. called the black Prince was the first Duke in England and Robert Earle of Oxford in the Raigne of R. 2. was the first Marques and the Lord Beaumont was the first Viscount created by K. H. 6. Floyers Case 8. Jacobi fol. 125. BAron and Feme seized of Lands holden in Chivalry in right of the Feme in Fee levy a Fine to one who grants and renders to them and the heires of the Baron and levy another Fine to their use for life the remainder to their three Sons in taile one after another the remainder in fee to the heires of the Baron the K. shall have neither wardship of body nor Land 1. Resol That is out of the Statute of 32. H. 8. cap. 2. if he who had the fee dye c. in respect the estate by the first Fine did not continue and this although both the Conveyances are voluntary 2. The King shall not have wardship of the third part because it is not for advancement of the Wife for in the first Fine the Land moved from her and shee had no more by the second Fine then by the first 3. In regard the particuler estate is out of the Statute no wardship accrueth to the King by advancement of him in the remainder but if a revertioner upon an estate for life convey it to the use of his Wife this will give wardship of the body of the heire for he in revertion is tenant if a Lease for life be the remainder to two and to the heires of one he who hath the fee dyeth his heire shall not be in ward if the heire of one joyntenant who had the fee dye of full age living the tenant for
a restraint against any particular person in certeine Vpon a Feoffement without warranty the Feoffee shall have all the Charters which comprize warranty and others though they be not given to him because hee is to defend the Title at his perill Upon a Feoffement with warranty without expresse grant the Feoffee shall not have any Charters which serve for to deraigne the warranty paramount Also the Feoffer shall have all Charters which serve for maintenance of the Title but the Feoffee shall have all which maintaine the possession as Court Rolls and which are concomitant and incident to the possession If A. be seized of a Segniorie rent advowson or other thing that lyeth in grant and grant the same over unto B. with warranty and B. grant that to C. with warranty In this case C. shall have the first deed although B. be bound to warrantie for without that he cannot make any Defence against A. or any claiming by him Pelhams Case 32. El. fo 14. A Tenant for life the remainder in Taile the remainder in fee bargaines and sells the Land to one who before the Statute of 14. El. ca. 8. suffers a recoverie in which A. is vouched and voucheth over and he in remainder enters and the entry is adjudged lawfull for the Recovery is a Forfeiture and the remainder may enter for it is the common Assurance As if Tenant for life had levied a Fine c. and suing of execution doth not toll the entry of the remainder and a Writ of error was sued and the plaintiffe release the errors Porters Case 35. El. fo 22. 32. H. 8. P. devised a house to his wife and her heires upon condition that she by advise c. with all convenient speed after his death should assure it c. for maintenance of a Free School c. for ever and dyes 32. H. 8. the wife enters and 3. E. 6. leases to A. for yeares the heire of P. enters and his entry adjudged lawfull because 23. H. 8. extends not to good uses nor doth it make the conveyance voyd or give entry but makes the use voyd and admit the use voyd yet the condition is not for Counsell may devise c. as to have a Corporation by Pattent and licence to assure and therefore the wife ought to have performed it Any man at this day may give Lands Tenements or hereditaments to any person or persons for the finding of a Preacher maintenance of a Schoole maimed Soulders poore people reparation of Churches High-wayes Bridges marriage of poore maids or any other charitable uses But it is good policy in every such Feoffment or estate to reserve to the Feoffor and his heires any small rent or to expresse some small summe of money for the consideration of the cause before recited Altonwoods Case 42. Eliz. fo 41. H. 8. seised of an estate Taile to him and the heires males of his body and of a Fee expectant grants in Taile and dyes without issue male adjuded that the grant is voyd for the King had an estate Taile in possession by which he might grant a lawfull estate for his own life and a Fee by which he might grant an estate Taile by speciall recitall And these words ex speciali gratia c. shall not produce a strainable construction against the rules of Law or in deceptionem regis Capells Case 23. Eliz. fo 62. A Tenant in Taile the remainder to B. in Taile B. grants a rent charge A. suffers a common recovery and dyes without issue the grantee distraines the Alienee of A. brings a Replevin adjudged for the alienee by all the Justices of England that a common recoverie against a Tenant in Tayle shall binde not onely the remainder and all Leases charges c. granted or made by him in remainder but also the Reversion and all Leases charges c. granted by him in reversion Archers Case 39. 40. Eliz. fo 66. LAnd was devised to the Father for life the remainder to the next heire male of the Father and to the heires males of his body the devisor dyes the Father infeoffes J. S. with warranty First it was resolved by Anderson and Walmeslowe et tot Cur. that the Father had but onely an estate for life for that he had an expresse estate for life demised unto him and the remainder is limitted to his next heire male in the singular number and his right heire male may not enter for the forfeiture in his life for he cannot be heire so long as he liveth Secondly It was resolved that the remainder to his right heire is a good remainder although he cannot have a right heire during his life but it sufficeth that it vesteth eo instanti that the particular estate determineth Dyer 14. Eliz. fo 309. Thirdly it was resolved which was the principall poynt in this case per tot Curiam that by the Feoffment of the Tenant for life the remainder was destroyed for every contingent remainder ought to vest either during the particular estate or at the least eo instanti that the particular estate determineth for if the particular estate be ended or determined in Deed or in Law before the contingency fall the remainder is voyd And in this case by the Feoffment of the Father his estate for life was determined by condition in Law which cannot be revived by any possibilitie for this cause the contingent remainder is voyd for by the Feoffment no right of the particular estate remaineth and the better opinion was that the warranty bindes the remainder though in Abeyance Bredons Case 39 40. Eliz Fol. 76. TEnant for life and the remainder in Taile joyne in a fine Come ceo c. to A. who renders a Rent charge of 40. l. a yeare to Tenant for life the remainder dies without issue the second remainder in taile enters Tenant for life distraines for the Rent adjudged he may and that the rent remaines after the death of Tenant in taile without issue during the life of Tenant for life the fine was no discontinuance for every one gave that which he might lawfully give and t is no forfeiture by Tenant for life for the Law construes this First to be a grant of him in remainder and after the grant of Tenant for life Vt res magis valeat c. If Tenant for life and the first remainder in Taile make a feoffement t is no discontinuance though the first remainder in taile dies without issue nor is it a forfeiture but the feoffee shall hold it during the life of Tenant for life but if it be without deed then t is a surrender of Tenant for life and the feoffement of the remainder Vt res magis valeat c. Corbets Case 42. Eliz Fol. 84. of Perpetuities C. Covenants to stand seised to the use of himselfe for life and after to the use of A. his Eldest Son and the Heires Males of his body the remainder to the use of B. his second Son and the
Heires Males of his Body c. And if A. or his issue c. shall attempt c. to alien c. by which any estate shall be barred c. that after such attempt and before any act executed the use and Estate of him so attempting c. shall cease onely as to him so attempting in the same degree as if he were naturally dead and not otherwise and that then it shall be immediately to such persons to whom it should come by the intent of the Indenture c. C. dyes A. suffers a recovery B. enters c. adjudged he could not for this proviso is repugnant impossible and against Law for the death of Tenant in taile is not a cesser of the Estate taile but death without issue Males and by this reason the issue should have it in the life of the Father c. And for every discent c. Death naturall or civill is requisite and t is not materiall though Tenant in taile had no issue at the time of the breach for t was repugnant at the beginning and the estate taile doth not commence by the having of issue and a gift in taile upon condition that if the Donee dyes his estate shall cease is a void condition Also the proviso is void for the incertainty as a gift to two Et haeredibus is voide though a Warranty be made to them and their Heirs in Jermine Arscotts Case the like proviso was adjudg'd voide for be the proviso a condition or a limitation the intire estate ought to be defeated by it and an Estate in Land cannot cease for part and continue for the residue nor cease for one person and continue for another nor cease for a time and revive after The like judgement was betwixt Chomly and Humble but the Parliament or Law may make an estate voide as to one and good to another as Tenant in speciall taile levies a fine the issue is barred not the wife so a release by the demandant to the vouchee is good not by a stranger so if an Executor surrender a tearme to one respect t is extinct to another t is assetts c. And uses are within the Statute De donis though it speakes onely of Lands and Tenements and there shall be a Possessio fratris c. of them for they are guided by the Rules of the common Law Richill in the time of R. 2. and Thirning in the time of H. 4. Justices intended for to make a perpetuity but could not Shelleyes Case 23. Eliz Fol. 94. EDward Shelley leased for yeares and after Covenanted to suffer a recovery which should be to the use of himselfe and after to the use of A. for 24. yeares and after to the Heires Males of the body of the said E S. and the Heires Males of the said Heires Males c. E. S. dyes 9 of Octob. the first day of the Terme in the morning betwixt five and six a clock the recovery passes the same day and an Habere facias seisinam awarded the recovery was executed the 19 of Octob. 4 Decemb. the Wife of the Eldest Son before dead of E. S. was delivered of a Son named Henry Richard the second Son of E. S. entered and made a Lease c. Henry entred upon the Lessee who brought an Eject firmae and Judgement was given for the Defendant and t was resolved that if Tenant in taile suffer a common recovery and dye before execution that execution may be sued against the issue for the intended recompence in favour of the common assurance resolved that the revertion in judgement of Law is not in the recoveror before execution sued for the judgement is Quod recuperet seisinam which cannot be executed till entry or claime as 't is of a Common c. granted upon condition for when a man may enter or claime the Law will not put things in him till entry or claime The third and great point resolved was that the Uncle is in as by discent though he shall not have his age nor be in ward 1. Because the recovery being the Originall act had its Essence in the life of E. S. to which the execution hath retrospect 2. Because the use might have vested in E. S. if he were in life 3. Neither the recoverors by their entry nor the Sheriffe by making execution may make an Inheritance to whom they please 4. Because the Uncle claimed the use by the recovery and Indenture and by words of limitation not purchase Albanies Case 28. Eliz Fo. 111. A By Indenture infeoffed B. of two Acres to the use of A. for life the remainder in taile to C. the remainder in fee to D. with a proviso if E. dye without issue that A. at any time by indenture sealed c. in the presence of foure c. may alter c. any use c. A. of the one acre infeoffes F. and for the other Acre A. by Indenture renounces surrenders releases c. to B. C. and D. the said power condition authority c. E. dyes without issue A. by Indenture in presence of foure revokes the first uses and limits new resolved that by the feoffement the power to revoke as to limit new uses was extinct and by Wray chiefe Justice the future power may be released as a condition subsequent though the performance or breach cannot be done without an act precedent but as to this poynt the Court did not give their resolution but the whole Court agreed that if the power had beene present as t is usuall this might be extinct to any one who hath a free hold in possession reversion or remainder 'T was moved if the future power could not be released whether it might be defeated by the words of defeasance both being executory and 't was said that in all cases when any thing executory is created by a deed that the same thing by consent of all parties to the creation by their deed may be nullified as a warranty recognizance rents charge annuities covenant c. And of the same opinion was Wray chiefe Justice and the whole Court and judgement given according Chudleighs Case Or the Case of perpetuities Fo. 120. SIr Richard Chudleigh was seised in fee of the Mannor of D. and had issue foure Sonnes A. B. C. D. and 26º Aprill the third and fourth of Phillip and Mary infeoffed E. F c. in fee to the use of himselfe and his Heires of the body of G. then Wife of H. and after to the use of the performance of his Will for ten yeares immediately after his death and after to the use of the feoffes and their Heires during the life of A. the Eldest Sonne the remainder to the use of the first issue Male of the body of A. and the Heires of the body of the first issue Male and so to the second issue Male the remainder to the use of B. the second Sonne and the Heires of his body the remainder to C.
the estate of the land which all the Court agreed 5. If the Fine had not been the auncient uses were determined without entry or claime because he himselfe was tenant for life of the land and the act of revocation is as strong as claime and this point was agreed in the Earle of Salops case 6. By the same conveyance that the auncient uses are revoked others may be raised without claime or other act and the Law adjudges a priority of operation Whites case adjudged according Maildmayes Case 24. Eliz. fo 175. A Use cannot be raised by any covenant proviso or bargaine c. upon a generall consideration and therefore if a man by Deed indented and inrolled c. for divers good causes considerations bargaine and sell his Land to another and his heires nihil operatur inde for no use shall be raised upon such generall considerations for it doth not appeare to the Court that the bargain or had quid pro quo But the bargainee may averre that money or other valuable consideration was paid or given if in truth it was so and the bargaine and sale is good It was resolved that when uses are raised by covenant in the consideration of advancement of any of his bloud and after in the same Indenture a Proviso that the Covenantor may make Leases for yeares c. that the Covenantor in this case may not make Leases for yeares to his sonne daughter or any of his bloud much lesse to any other person because that the power to make Leases for yeares was voyd when the Indenture was sealed and delivered For the covenant upon this generall consideration will not raise any use and no particular averment in this case may be taken but if the uses be limitted upon a recoverie fine or feoffment there needeth not any consideration to raise any of the uses Resolved that the words other consideration cannot comprise any consideration expressed in the Indenture before the proviso for other ought to be in quality nature and person different and advancement of his daughter is a consideration mentioned before Anthonie Mildmay brought an action of the case against Roger Standish for saying that Lands were lawfully assured to John Talbott for 1600. yeares and that he was lawfully possessed of the same tearme whereas in truth the said Lands were not lawfully assured for the said tearme nor the said John Talbott was lawfully possessed of the interest thereof And so for slaundering of the title by speaking of the words Mildmay brought an action Standish justified the words and shewed the title of Talbott and it was adjudged that the action was maintaineable and good although that Talbott had a limitation of the Land by will which was the reason that Standish being a man not learned in the Lawes affirmed the words yet because he tooke upon him the notice of the Law and medled in a matter that did not concerne him Judgement was given for Mildmay Et ignorantia juris non excusat THE SECOND BOOK Of Sir Edward Cooke Lord c. Mansers Case 26. Eliz. fo 3. IF a man be unlearned and cannot read and be bound to doe an act of sealing assurances writings c. upon tender c. he is not bound to seale and deliver any such writing if there be not some ready which may read the Deed if the party so require it and in the same language and tongue that he understandeth Ignorantia duplex est facti juris and ignorance in reading or of the language Quae sunt ignorantia facti may excuse but ignorantia juris non excusat and if it be read unto him he may not have a reasonable time to shew it to his Councell learned to see whether it agree with his bond or covenant for he must seale it at his perill or if the same be truly expounded to him it is good enough But if it be read amisse or declared contrary to what it is and thereby the illiterated man is deceived he may very well plead non est factum For the Law saith it is not his Deed and so it was adjudged in Throughgoods case being the third case in this second Booke Resolved that if a man be bound that a stranger shall doe an act in such case he takes upon him that he shall doe it at his perill for he which is bound takes more upon him for a stranger then for himselfe in many cases If a man plead that he hath kept a man indemnified c. he ought to shew how otherwise where he pleads in the negative Non fuit damnificatus Goddards Case 26. El. fo 4. AN obligation dated the fourth of Aprill Anno 24. El. and delivered as the Deed of the partie 30. July An. 23. El. adjudged the Deed of the partie for though the plaintiffe in pleading cannot alledge the delivery before the Date because he is estopped yet a Jury which are sworne to speake the truth shall not be estopped The Date of a Deed is not the substance of the Deed. For if it want date or have an impossible Date as the 30. February the Deed is good For there are three things of the essence or substance of a Deed viz. writing in paper or parchment sealing and delivery And if it have these three although it want In Cujus rei testimonium Sigillum suum apposuit c. yet the Deed is good and when a Deed is delivered it takes effect by the delivery not by the date Throughgoods Case 26. Eliz. fo 9. REsolved that 't is not materiall whether the party to whom the Deed is made or another by his procurement or a Stranger of his owne head reades the writing in other words then the writing is so that he that seales it be a lay man and without covin in him deceived and the pleading of it is alwayes generall without shewing by whom 't was read and A. shall voyde an obligation to B. by pleading that he did it â—y menace of C. Resolved that such a lay-man is not bound to deliver a Deed if no body be present that can reade it in such language as he can understand and if it be read in other words it shall not binde him and 't is at the perill of him to whom 't is made that the very effect and purport of it be declared if it be required but if he doe not request it he shall be bound by it though it be made contrary to his meaning Resolved that it shall not binde if the effect be declared in other words then it is as if the Deed had been read in other words Two Justices a Feoffement of two acres is read as of one it shall not binde see Mansers case before Wisemans Case 27. Eliz. fo 15. TEnant in tayle of certaine Lands the remainder to another in Fee he in remainder by Deed indented and inrolled in consideration of bloud c. as for other good considerations doth covenant to stand seized of the said
house or not When a man maketh a feoffment of a Messuage cum pertinentii he departeth with nothing thereby but that which is parcell of the house as buildings curtelage and gardens If a Lessee for yeares makes a Lease for a certaine Tearme of any parcell and so divides the possession thereof from the residue if of this parcell so severed Liverie be made the possession in the residue by the first lessee is not any impediment to the liverie of this parcell otherwise if a Lessee make a Lease at will of any parcell there his possession of the residue shall hinder the liverie made in this parcell and with this judgement agreed all the other Justices and Serjeants of Serjeants Inne in Fleete-streete Doddingtons Case 27. Eliz. fo 32. KIng H. 8. Ex certa scientia c. granted to A. for 300 l. Omnia illa Messuagia in tenura Johannis Browne Scituate in Well nuper prioratini de W. Spectant ' And in truth the Lands lie in D. in this Case 't was resolved that the grant was voide by the Common Law as well in case of a common person as the King because the grant is generall and is restrained to one certaine Village and the grantee shall not have any Lands out of that Village to which the generallity of the grant is referred for this Pronoune Illa hath his necessary reference as well to the Towne as well as to the Tenure of I. B. for if eyther the one or the other faile the grant is voide And so it was adjudged Per tot cur de Banco Regis Resolved also that this grant was not holpen by the Statute of 34. H. 8. For no grants are holpen by this Statute nor by any act of confirmation but such as comprehend convenient certainty 1. Quia generale nihil certum implicat And here no Tenements are mentioned to be granted because the generall grant being intire was referred to a falsity and therefore it cannot be said that the Towne was misnamed and great inconvenience would follow if c. for the King should be deceived but the Statute helpes when there is a convenient certainty as a Mannor Farme Land knowne by a certaine name or containing so many Acres c. So that it may appeare what things the King intended to passe Note t is the most sure way for the Pattentee to expresse as much as he can in certainty before the generall words SIR Rowland Heywards Case In cur Wardor 37. Eliz. fo 35. SIr Rowland Heyward seised of a Mannor in Demeans and rents in consideration of money doth demise grant Bargaine and sell to A. the said Mannours Lands Tenements and the reversions and remainders with all Rents reserved upon any demise to have and to hold to A. and his asignes after the death of the Lessor for seaventeene yeares rendring a rose the Indenture was inrolled and after the Lessor by Indenture doth Covenant with B. to stand seised of the premises to the use of himselfe and the Heires of his body and no attornment was made to A. The Question was What passed to A and it was resolved by Popham and Anderson chiefe Justices and the Court that A. may have his election eyther to take the same by demise at the common Law or by bargaine and Sale Per Statutum 27. H. 8. without attornment for it was one entire demise and bargaine of one Mannor without any fraction or division thereof and this election remaineth to A. and his Executors and assignes for here is not Election to claime one of two severall things by one Title but to claime one thing by one of the two severall Titles for where the things are severall nothing passeth before Election and the Election must precede but when one thing passeth the Election of the Title may be subsequent For if I. have 3 Horses and doe give to you one of them the property comenceth by Election and must be made in the life of the Parties The Bi of Sarum had a great wood of 1000 Acres called Brerewood and infeoffed another of one House and seaventeene Acres parcell of the Wood and made Liverie in the Wood House nothing passeth of the Wood before Election and the Heire of the feoffee may not make Election Bullocks Case 10. Eliz. Dyer In case where election is given of two several things he which is the primer Agent and that ought to doe the first act shall have alwayes the Election As if a man grant a Rent of twenty Shillings or a Robe the Grantor shall have the Election for he is the primer Agent eyther by paying the one or delivering the other If a man make a Lease rendring twenty shillings or a Robe the Lessee shall have the Election Causa qua supra but if I give unto you one of my Horses in my Stable there you shall have the Election for you are the Primer Agent by taking or seising one of them and so of twenty trees in my Wood. Note for Elections these diversities 1. When nothing passes to the grantee c. before Election there it ought to be made in the life of the Parties but when the Estate passes presently c. the Grantee c his Heire or Executor may elect 2. When the same thing passes and the Donee c. hath Election in what manner c. he will take it the Donee Heire or Executor may elect 3. When Election is given to severall persons the first shall stand 4. When Election is given of two severall things he which ought to doe the first Act shall have Election 5. When the thing granted is annuall and to have continuance there the Election remaines to the Grantor in case where the Law gives him Election as well after the day as before otherwise t is when the thing is to be performed Vnica vice 6. The feoffee c. by his act may forfeit his Election as if A. infeoffe B. of two Acres Habendum the one for life the other in Taile and hee before Election makes a feoffement of both here the feoffor shall enter in which he pleases for the wrong of the feoffee 7. Though the Lessees here enter generally yet they may Elect after so if one be Executor and Devisee of a terme and enters generally c. and after the Lessees in the principall case made Election for to take by bargaine and Sale and had the Rents The Bishop of Winchesters Case 38. El. fo 43. In a prohibition REsolved that at common Law none had capacity to take Tythes but spirituall persons or Persona mixta as the King and regularly no meere Lay man was capable of them except in speciall Cases for he could not sue for them in Court Christian and regularly a lay man had no remedy for them till 32 H. 8. A Lay-Man may be discharged of Tythes at the common Law by grant or by composition but not by prescription for it is commonly said in our Law-Books that a lay man may
prescribe In modo decimandi but not In non decimando And the reason is because he is not except in speciall Cases capable of Tythes at the common Law before the Statute of 32. H. 8. Cap. 7. And therefore without speciall matter shewing it shall not be intended that he hath any Lawfull discharge and in favour of the Holy Church although it may have a lawfull comencement the Law will not suffer this prescription In non decimando to put it to the Tryall of lay men which sooner will straine their conscience for their private benefit then render to the Church the duty which belongeth to it A spirituall person that was capable of Tythes at the common Law in pernancy may prescribe to be discharged of Tythes generally or to have a portion of Tythes in the Land of another Before the Counsell of Lateran every man might give his tythes to any spirituall person that he would and if the Lands of the Bishop were discharged in his hands absolutely by prescription the demising it to a lay man cannot make it chargeable and the Bishop might reserve the greater Rent And in discharge of Tythes the Judges of our Law doe know that the Ecclesiasticall Judges will not allow any such allegation and therefore a Traverse Absque hoc quod judices placitum c. recusarunt is insufficient for the refusall is not materiall for the party might have a prohibition before any plea pleaded by him but in some Cases the refusall is traversable as t was adjudgd in Morris and Eatons Case where t was pleaded that the plaintiffe did not read the Articles c. and that the Ecclesiasticall Judge refused this Plea But the truth is a man may prescribe that hee and all others whose estate he hath in the mannor of D. time out of remembrance have paid to the parson of C. for the time being one certaine pension yearly for the maintenance of Divine service there in contentation of all Tythes renewing or happening within the same Mannor and prescribe in respect of the pension payd c. to have all the Tythes within c. and this was adjudgd good in Banco Regis Mich. 39. Et. 40. El. Rotulo 199. And that a lay-person may sue for the Tythes c. For at the beginning it shall be intended that the Lord was seised of the whole Mannor before any tenancy was derived out of the same and then by composition or other lawfull meanes the Lord had all the Tythes within the Mannor for the said Pension paying to the parson and the Law intends it was for Divine service Et pro bono Ecclesiae the reason of whch intendment is the continuall usage time out of remembrance And upon such speciall matter a man might have Tythes as appurtenant to a Mannor for he prescribes in a Que estate in the Mannor and therefore cannot have them in grosse but t was adjudged Winscombs Case in a prohibition that a man cannot prescribe generally in him and all those c. to have Tythes appurtenant to a Mannor without speciall matter shewne because Tythes are due Jure divino The Arch-Bishop of Canterburies Case 38. Of the Queene fo 46. A Religious house in M. was given to E. 6. by the Statute of 1. E. 6. a Rectory which was impropriated to it was granted to the Arch-Bishop of Canturbury who leased to the Defendant and Land within M. parcell of the said Colledge came to the Lord Cobham and from him to the Plaintiffe who shewes that the Master of the Colledge was seised of the said Land and Rectorie Simul semel as well at the making of 31. H 8. as of 1. E. 6. Resolved that this Colledge came to the King by 1. E. 6. onely for when 31. H. 8. speakes of dissolution renouncing relinquishing forfeiture giving up which are inferior meanes by which c. or by any other meanes cannot be intended of an act of Parliament which is the highest manner of conveyance that can be and the makers would have placed this in the beginning if they had intended it Bishops are not included within 13 of the Queene which begins with Colledges Deanes and Chapters c. Also 1. E. 6. Enacts that all Colledges by this Parliament shall be in actuall possession of the King which last act being of as high nature as the first it cannot come to the King by 31. H. 8. and it was never pleaded that of Colledges which came by 1. E. 6. the King was seised Vigore of the Statute of 31. H. 8. Resolved that neither the Act nor the meaning of 31. H. 8. extends to other Colledges then to those which came to the King by 31. H. 8. for it should be absurd that a Branch of the act of 31. H. 8. should extend to a future Act of which the makers of 31. without a spirit of prophecy could not have foreknowledge and the Act of 31. concludes in as large manner as the late Abbots c. which late as it hath been agreed extends onely to those to be dissolved by 31. Resolved admitting that the Colledge had come to the King by 31. H. 8. that such a generall allegation of unity of possession of the Rectory and the Land with it was not sufficient for no unity shall be sufficient but lawfull and perpetuall unity of possession time out of minde as 't was adjudged in Knightly and Spencers case and that the generall allegation of the plaintiffe that the Master of the Colledge at the making of 1. E. 6. held the Land discharged is not good without shewing how either by prescription composition or other lawfull meanes as 't is adjudged in the Bishop of Winchesters case otherwise if the Land had come by 31. then by force of the said branch of discharge such generall allegation had been good Resolved that no Ecclesiasticall house except religious was within the Statute of 31. H. 8. Resolved that though 1. E. 6. saith that the King shall have the lands of Colledges in as ample and large manner as the said Priests c. enjoyed the same yet these generall words doe not discharge the land of any tythes for they doe not issue out of the land for a Prior had tythes against his own Feoffment of the Mannor and 't is no good cause of prohibition to alledge unity of possession in a Colledge which came to the King by 1. E. 6. as 't is upon 31. H. 8. in Abbyes c. For the Statute of 1. E. 6. hath no such clause of discharge of payment of tythes as 31. hath and therefore such perpetuall unity will not serve upon 1. E. 6. So 't was likewise resolved betwixt Greene and Buffkin Sir Hugh Cholmleys case 39. of the Queene fo 50. TEnant in Taile the remainder in taile the remainder bargaines and sells the Land and all his estate to J. S. to have for the life of Tenant in taile the remainder to the Queene c. upon condition that the
the husband had and to the remainder A. tenant in taile the remainder to B. the remainder to C. the remainder to D. A. makes a Feoffement the feoffee suffers a recovery B. is vouched and he vouches the common vouchee A. is not bound but B. and all the remainders are for though the remainders are discontinued and cannot be remitted till the taile be recontinued yet in a common recovery which is the common assurance he which comes in as vouchee shall be in judgement of Law in privity of the estate which he ever had though the precedent estate upon which the estate of the vouchee depends be discontinued so here the husband shall be said in of the taile and 't is the stronger because the estate of the wife was put to a right so that the husband came in as sole tenant in taile and not joyntly with his wife because she is not vouchee and he cannot be in of another estate because once he had a taile but had they had a joynt estate to them and the heires of their two bodies he being onely vouched it might be doubted whether the taile should be barred because the wife had a joynt inheritance with him 8. of the Queene Dyer Knivetons case A Praecipe is brought against tenant for life and the remainder in taile they vouch over it shall not binde the taile for the remainder is not tenant to the Praecipe and the land is recovered against the tenant for life onely and recompence shall not goe to the remainder and the remainder was never seised by force of the taile and so 't was adjudged in Leach and Coles case 41. of the Queene Heydons case 26. of the Queene fo 7. THe Gardians and Cannons Regular of the late Colledge of O. seised of the Mannor of O. granted a Coppihold to Father and Sonne for their lives c. and after they leased it to H. for fourescore yeares rendring the ancient Rent and after surrendred their Colledge Resolved that the lease to H. was voyd the Coppi-hold for life continuing by the Statute of 31. H. 8. For Coppihold is an estate for life and the Statute saith of which any estate or interest for life c. at the making of such grant had continuance reade the Booke at large where you have admirable rules for true interpretation of all Statutes Resolved when a Parliament alters the service tenure interest of the land c. in prejudice of the Lord custome or tenant the generall words shall not extend to Coppi-holds as the Statute of W. 2. de donis conditionalibus doth not extend to them for if the Statute should alter the estate this should also alter the tenure for the donee ought to hold of the donor and to doe such services without speciall reservation as his donor did to the Lord and the intent of the act was not to extend to such base estates which were taken then but tenants at will and the Statute saith Voluntas donatoris observetur in carta c. So that which shall be intailed ought to be such an hereditament which may be given by Charter and great part of the land within the Realme being granted by Coppy it would be inconvenient that Coppi-holds should be intailed yet neither Fine nor Recovery should barre them so that the owner cannot without making a forfeiture by assent of the Lord and a new grant dispose of it for payment of debts advancement of his wife or younger issues wherefore the Statute doth not extend to them by Manwood Ch' Baron which the Court agreed But 't was objected that the Custome and the Statute cooperating might make a taile as if by a custome a remainder had been limitted over and injoyed and plaints in nature of a Formedon in discender brought and the land recovered by it so neither the custome without the Statute nor the Statute without the custome can make a taile And Littleton saith that if a custome hath been that lands c. have been granted c. or in taile c. paulo post that a Formedon in discender lyes of all tenements which Writ was not at common law Manwood answered if the Statute doth not extend to them without question the custome cannot for before the Statute all estates of inheritance were fee simple and no custome can commence after the Statute for this being made 13. E. 1. is made within time of memory and Littleton is to be intended of a fee simple conditionall for he knew well that no custome could commence after the Statute of W. 2. as appeares in his booke 2. ca. 10. and 34. H. 6. and a Formedon in discender in speciall cases lay at the common Law And by the Court another Act made at the same time which gives an Elegit extends not to Coppiholds for the reason aforesaid but other Statutes made at the same time extend to them as ca ' 3. which gives a Cui in vita receite and ca ' 4. which gives to the particular tenant a Quod ei deforceat Resolved that though 't was not found that the said rents were the usuall rents accustomed to be reserved within 20. yeares before yet because 't was found that the accustomed rent was reserved and a custome goes to all times before it shall be so intended without shewing the contrary and judgement was enterd for the Queene The common Law is founded upon the perfection of reason and not according to any private and sudden conceite or opinion Borastons Case 29. of the Queene fo 19. B. Devised land for eight yeares and after to his executors to performe his will till H. his youngest Sonne come to the age of 21. yeares and when H. comes to 21. yeares then that he shall have to him and his heires H. dyed at the age of 9. yeares Objected that till H. attaines to 21. yeares the land descends to the heire and for that he never attained to 21. yeares this remaines in the heire and the intent appeares by the words that he should not have till he come to 21. yeares and this ought to precede the commencement of the remainder and if land were leased till H. comes to 21. yeares H. then being of 9. yeares 't is no absolute lease for 12. yeares for if H dye before 21. the lease shall be determined which the Court agreed 'T was also said that when the particular estate which should support the remainder may determine before the remainder can commence there the remainder doth not vest presently but depends in contingency If one make a Lease to A. for life and after the death of B. the remainder to another in Fee this remainder depends upon contingency for if A. dye before B. the remainder is voyd A Lease is made to A. for life the remainder to B. for life and if B. dye before A. the remainder to C. for life this is a good remainder upon contingency If A. survive B. which case is all one with
and accepted the Rent by the hands of the assignee due after the assignement and before that this rent now demanded was due the Plaintiffe demurred and adjudged against him because the privity of the contract was determined by the death of the Lessee and therefore after the assignement made by the administrator Debt doth not lye for rent due after the assignement Also it was said that if a Lessee assigne over his terme the Lessor may charge the Lessee or his Assignee at his Election And if the Lessor accept the rent of the assignee he hath determined his Election and shall not have an action after against the Lessee for rent due after the assignement no more then a Lord having received the Rent of the Feoffee shall avow upon the Feoffor afterwards Butler and Bakers Case 33. and 34. of the Queene fo 25. W. B. and his Wife seised of the mannor of H. by an Estate made to them during coverture for the joynture of the Wife in taile holden In Capite and W. seised of Land in F. both which amount to a third part of all his Lands and also of the Mannor of T. In capite which amounts to two parts W. devises T. to his Wife upon condition that shee should take no former joynture and dyed the Wife in pays refused H. the question was whither the Will were good for the intire Mannor of T. or but for part by the Statutes of 32. and 34. H 8. Resolved that at common Law if a gift be to a Husband and Wife in taile c. the Husband dyes the Wife cannot devest the free hold by any verball Waiver or disagreement in pays as if she say before entry that shee will never agree to it shee may enter when shee pleases so if shee saith reciting her estate that shee assents c. to the said estate yet afterwards shee may waive it in a Court of record but if shee enters into the Land and takes the profits though shee saith nothing t is a good agreement in Law for the Law more respects acts without words then words without acts and a freehold shall not be so easily devested to the intent that the Tenant to the Praecipe should be the better knowne But as an act in Pays may amount to an agreement so it may amount to a disagreement but this is alwayes of one and the same thing if the Tenant by deed infeoffe the Lord and a stranger and maketh livery to the Lord if the Lord dissagree ' by word t is worth nothing and if he enters generally and takes the profits t is an agreement but if he distraines for his Seigniory t is a dissagreement yet in some cases a claime by words shall direct the entry to be an agreement to one Estate and a disagreement to another c. See the Booke at large but a man may devest the property of goods and Chattells or an obligation sealed to him by disagreement In pays Resolved that though the estate was created by way of use which use before the Statute might have beene waived in Pays yet now the Statute hath so incorporated the use and possession of the Land that it cannot be waived In pays more then an Estate created by feoffment c. yet t was here resolved That the refusall In pays to have H. and the entry and agreement to T. was a good agreement to the one and disagreement to the other And this by 27. H. 8. ca ' 10. If any Woman hath Lands c. assured after Marriage c. after the death of the Husband She may refuse her joynture and take her Dower c. And upon these words the Court agreed That a Woman might refuse her Joynture In pays and be indowed by consent or Writ The great doubt was if by this refusall of H. by operation of Law it doth discend immediatly to the Heire after the death of the Devisor for to satisfie the Statute which saith The King shall take for his third part such Mannors c. as shall discend c. immediatly after the death of the devisor Resolved First Upon the reason of the common Law the refusall shall not have such relation that the devise shall be good for the intire Mannor of T. for a relation is a fiction of Law to make a nullity of a thing Ab initio to one certaine intent which in truth had being and that Propter necessitatem ut res magis valeat quam pereat 11. E. 3. The Law will make a nullity Ab initio that the Wife shall have dower but not as to a collaterall intent as if the reversion were granted of the Lands which the Husband and Wife held in taile and the Wife for to have Dower dissagrees yet the grant is good for shee may be endowed though the grant stand and Relatio est fictio juris et intenta ad unum And though relations aide acts in Law as Dower yet t will never aide the acts of the party to avoyd them by relation as a man infeoffes an Infant or Feme covert and after gives c. or devises the Land or any thing out of it the Infant or Husband disagrees this shall have relation betwixt the parties that the Infant or Husband shall not be charged in damages but shall not make the voyd devise c. good A Lease for life the remainder to the King the King grants his remainder the deed is in-rolled it shall have relation to make this passe Ab initio to the King not to make the voyd pattent good And as relations extend onely to the same thing and the same intent so also to the same parties not for to prejudice a Stranger feoffement of a Mannor and a long time after livery the Tenants attourne this shall have relation to make the services passe Ab initio or otherwise they could never passe nor be parcell of the Mannor but not for to charge the Tenants for the arrerages in the meane time So here the refusall shall relate as to the mannor of H. onely not to T. and to the wife onely but not to prejudice the Heire upon whom part of the Mannor of T. discended to make the devise good for the third part which was voide at the time of the death For Omne testamentum morte consummatum est and as it was at the death so it shall remaine Resolved that after the Statute of 27. H. 8. and before the Statute of 32 H. 8. the Mannor of T. was not devisable and therefore when the devisor hath not pursued the Authority which the Acts of 32. 34. H. 8. gives t was voide for part The first branch he hath not pursued which saith That all c. having a sole estate in fee simple in any Mannors c. shall have full and free liberty c. to dispose by his last will in writing as much of c. as shall amount to the cleere yearely value of two parts in three to
the Donor was in possession and used them and fraud is alwayes apparelled with trust and trust is the cover of fraud Sixthly it was contained in the deed that it was honesty truely and bona fide Et clausulae inconsuetae semper juducunt suspitionem and it was resolved although it was a due debt to Twyne and a good consideration of the deed yet it was not within the proviso of the said Act of 13. Eliz. By which it is provided that the said Act doth not extend to any estate or interest in Lands c. goods and chattells made upon good consideration and Bona fide for although it be upon good and true consideration yet it is not Bona fide for no deed shall be deemed to be made Bona fide within the said proviso that is accompanied with any trust for the proviso saith upon good consideration and Bona fide so as good consideration doth not serve if it be not also Bona fide Therefore good Reader if any deed be made to thee in satisfaction of any debt by one that is indebted unto others also First let it be in publick manner before Neighbours Secondly valued-by good men to a true value Thirdly take them out of the possession of the Donor presently for continuance of possession in the Donor is a marke of trust There are two considerations Viz. Consideration of blood or nature and valuable consideration And if one that is indebted to five severall persons every one 20. l. in consideration of naturall affection doth give all his goods unto his Sonne or Cosen The intention of the Statute was that the consideration in this case should be valuable for equity requires that this deed that defeates others shall be made of as high a consideration as the things are that are so defeated thereby for it is to be presumed that the Father if he had not beene indebted unto others would not dispossesse himselfe of all his goods and subject himselfe to his Cradle And therefore it shall be intended that it was to defeate his Creditors And if a consideration of nature or blood should be a good consideration within this proviso the Statute would serve for little or nothing and no creditor should be sure of his Debt A feoffment made solely in consideration of nature or blood shall not take away the use raysed upon valuable consideration but it shall take away a use raised in consideration of nature for both considerations are in Equali jure and of the same nature Many men marvaile the reason that so many acts and Statutes are dayly made this Verse answereth Queritur ut crèscunt tot magna volumina legis In promptu causa crescit in orbe dolus And because fraud abounds in these dayes more then in former times it was resolved that all Statutes made against fraud shall be liberally expounded for to suppresse the fraud and according to this see severall resolutions in the Booke at large It was resolved that no purchasor may avoyd a precedent conveyance made by fraud but he that is a purchasor for money or other valuable consideration paid for consideration of blood is a good consideration but not such a consideration as is intended by the Statute 27. El. ca 4. for valuable consideration is onely good consideration by the same act Anderson chiefe Justice of the common banck said That a man who is of small capacity and not able to governe his Lands that discends unto him and being disposed to ryot and disorder by the mediation of his friends by open Act conveyes his Lands to them upon trust and confidence that he shall take the profits for his maintainance and that he shall have no power to wast or consume them And after he being seduced by deceitfull and covetous persons bargained for small summes his Lands of great value this bargaine although it were for money was holden to be out of this Statute for this act was made against all fraud and deceit and shall not ayd any purchasor that commeth not to the Lands for good considerations lawfully without fraud or deceit And in this case Twyne was convicted of fraud and he and all the others of a ryot Resolutions P. 44. of the Queene upon the Statutes of Fines fo 84. A. Tenant for life the remainder to B. in taile the remainder to B. and his heires B. levies a Fine hath issue and dyes before all the Proclamations passed the issue then beyond the Sea the Proclamations are made the issue retournes and upon the land claimes the remainder Resolved that the estate which passed was not determined by the death of tenant in taile so if tenant in taile of a rent Advowson Tythes Common c. grants by Deed and dyes for if the issue brings a Formedon for the rent he makes the grant voidable if he distraines or claimes it upon the land he by this determines his election And there is no diversity betwixt tenant in taile of a rent c. and tenant in taile of a reversion or a remainder upon an estate for life though in the first case the issue may have a Formedon presently after the death of tenant in taile Holden by Popham and divers other Justices that the Statute of 32. H. 8. hath inforced the case that the estate which passes by the Fine of tenant in taile shall not be determined by his death for by this 't is provided that Fines levied of any lands c. intailed immediatly after the Fine ingrossed and Proclamations made shall be a barre if the Fine cannot be a barre without continuance the Statute hath provided that the estate shall continue for it provides for all necessary incidents to the perfection and consummation of it Every Fine shall be intended with Proclamations for 't is most beneficiall for the conusee and all Fines being the generall assurance of land are levied according Resolved that though by the death of tenant in taile a right of the estate taile descends to the issue for that the tenant in taile dyed before all the Proclamations passed yet when they are passed without claime this right is barred by the Statute of 32. H. 8. Resolved by all the Judges and Barons but three that the issue in this case being heire and privy cannot by any claime save the right of the taile which is descended to him but that after the Proclamations he shall be barred for 't is provided that every Fine after the ingrossing of it and Proclamation had and made shall be a finall end and conclude as well privies as strangers And if no saving had been all strangers had been barred also and all the exceptions extend onely to Strangers but the issue is privy To the objection if by the equity of the Statutes the issue cannot claime c. to what purpose are the Proclamations with such solemnities Answered 32. H. 8. being an Act of explanaiton of 4. H. 7. as to the Fine by tenant in taile shall
money to the said uses yet these Lands are given to the King for it shall not be intended to be upon other consideration but that which they at that time conceived to be the service of God which is the most worthy consideration and the reason wherefore the demise was made to his Friends was because he imposed more trust in them then others therefore the persons shall not be regarded 2. A demise of an estate for life or in taile is within this Statute by equity although that the Statute saith To have continuance for ever for the intent of the Statute was to tolle such uses and regardeth not the time of their continuance 2. An estate taile may continue for ever and so was the intent of the devisor in this case that the uses should continue for ever for he limits his heire to doe it 3. Without this construction the Statute should be defrauded 3. The Statute giveth to the King Lands given for the finding of a Priest and giving of Lands upon condition to find a Priest is within the Statute for this is more compulsory then the other 4. All the Land is given to the King but not by the first Branch for that extends onely to lawfull Chanteries or those who have countenance of lawfull comencement but not to such who are without any colour of lawfull comencement as if they were founded by license of the Pope this chantry is without colour of lawfull comencement or foundation also if Lands be given to the finding of a chantery without Corporation this is out of the said Branch Neither by the second Branch for that giveth the Lands belonging to such Colledges to the King without which he shall have onely the Scites but by the third Branch for this extends to finding of a Priest without Corporation But 't was objected that the Land was not given to the finding of a Priest for he had but a pension out of it and the Statute is that the King shall have in as large c. as the Priest had it 2. Here is a good use limitted six pence by the Weeke to six poore men and although it be Ad orandum c. this is not within for it is out of the Statute except that Orisons be to be performed in publique For answer to these these differences were taken 1. If one give 20. li. per annum for the finding of a Priest and limit to the Preist 10. li. per annum all is given to the King for the residue shall be intended for the finding of necessaries otherwise it is if a condition be annexed to the gift to give 10. l. per annum to a Priest there the King shall have but 10. li. 2. Land of 20. l. per an is given to find a Priest with 10. l. thereof and that the other ten pound shall be to the Poore the King shall have but ten pound but if it be for finding of a Preist and maintainance of Poore Men without limitting how much the Priest shal have the King shall have the Land for otherwise he shall have nothing 3. If Land of 20. l. is given for finding Sallary for a Priest with 10. l. of it and also a good use is limitted there the King shall have but ten pound although that other necessaries are to be found for the Priest because a good use in certaine shall be preferred before a superstitious incertaine use but if nothing in certaine be limitted to the Preist the King shall have the Land 4. If Land be given to find a Priest the King shall have it but if a Priest have but a stipend the King shall have but the stipend 5. When a certaine summe is limitted to a Priest and other good uses are also limitted which depend upon the superstitious use all is given to the King 6. If all the uses be superstitious of what certainty soever they are the land is given to the King otherwise it is if there be any good use and as to that which was objected that the King shall have no more then the Priest It was answered that that extends to the 1.2 and 4. Branches and not to the third for otherwise the King should never have the land it selfe for this was never used to be limitted to the Priest himselfe And although that these Orisons are to be made out of any Church yet it is within the Statute for the words Church or Chappell extend to Lamps and lights and not to prayers 2. The Statute speakes of an anniversary c or other like thing and this is a like thing but in the Case at Barre if he had said that his Friends should have the residue of the profits of the Land this had saved the Land Actons Case 45. Eliz com banco in a Quare imperit fo 117. A Noble Woman reteineth a Chaplaine who purchaseth a dispensation she taketh a Husband the Chaplaine is promoted to another benefice then that which he had before the reteiner his first benefice is not voyd It was Objected that the Statute speakes of duches c. being Widdowes or Married under the degree of a Baron and for that when she Marrieth above the degree she is out of the Statute and 't is not sufficient that she be within the Statute at the time of the reteiner but she ought to be so also at the time of the promotion It was answered that all which the Statute requires at the time of the reteiner is that she be a Noble Woman Married under the degree of a Baton or a Widdow and to be noble at the time of the promotion therefore a noble Woman Married above that degree cannot reteine or if at the time of the promotion she be not noble as if her Earle be attainted and although that Baron and Feme have but one body yet they have two souls wherefore it is not inconvenient that they should have severall Chaplaines and the reason for which the said provision was made for a noble Woman who marrieth an ignoble Husband was not to exclude those who married Nobles but because such Femes are in Law ignoble except they be noble by descent and without such provision shall be out of the Statute Baron reteineth a Chaplaine and dyeth the Chaplaine may reteine both the benefices but he shall be punished for non residency without suing a non obstante Dumpors Case 45. Eliz. banco regis in Trespas fo 119. A Man maketh a Lease provided that the Lessee or his assignes shall not alien the premises without speciall license of the Lessor c. The Lessor giveth license to the Lessee to alien the same or any part thereof c. in this Case the Lessee may alien and his assignes Ad infinitum without any more license and the proviso is determined The Lord Stafford made a Lease to three persons upon condition that they nor any of them should alien without the consent of the Lessor and after one of them did alien with
A Man leaseth S. for 10. yeares and C. for 20. yeares and both to another for 40. yeares after the end of the said severall demises ten yeares expire the last Lessee enters into S. and upon ouster brings trespasse and recovereth for the joynt words of the parties shall be taken Respective and the leases shall commence severally upon the severall determination of the said leases Joynt words shall be taken severally 1. In respect of the severall interest of the grantors as if two Tenants in common grant a rent charge 2. In respect of the severall interest of the grantees as a joynt warranty to two severall Tenants 3. In respect that the grant cannot commence at one time as a remainder limitted to the right heires of I. S. and I. N. 4. In respect of the incapacity of the grantees to take joyntly 5. Ratione subjectae materiae as rent granted to two copartners for equality of partition 6. Ne res destruatur ut evitetur absurdum as in Cessavit the tenure is alleadged by homage fealty and rent and quod in faciendo servitia praedicta cessavit it shall be construed to such services onely as of which a man may cease Brudenells Case 34. Eliz. banco regis fo 9. IF a lease be made to A. during the life of B. and C. without saying during the life of the survivor of them if one of them die yet the estate is not determined But A. shall have the land during the life of the survivor for if a man make a lease of Land to two persons during their lives they assigne over their estate now the assignee hath estate for life of them too and if one dye he shall have the land during the life of the Survivor Note two diversities th one a limitation in this Case aforesaid th' other a condition for if a man demyse Land for 100. yeares if A. and B. live so long in this case if th' one of them dye the Lease is determined for the Lease is conditionall and not Determinable by limmitation of estate and the life of a man is collaterall to the Lease which is but onely a Chattle If an administrator have judgement and dye his Executors cannot sue execution of that judgement but he that shall be subject to the payment of the Debts of the first intestate and that are not the Executors of the administrator vide 26. H. 8. fo 7. Hensteads Case 36. 37. Eliz. com banco fo 10. A Feme lessor or lessee at will taketh Husband the will is not determined for it may be prejudiciall to the Husband to have it determined So if one of the Lessees or Lessors at will dye but in case where one of the joynt Lessees at will dyeth nothing surviveth but the others shall pay all the rent Jues Case 39 40. Eliz. com banco fo 11. I. Leaseth a Mannor to S. for thirty yeares excepting Woode and underwood growing upon it and after Leased to him the Woode for 62. yeares without impeachment of wast and leaseth to him the Mannor for thirty yeares after expiration of the first thirty yeares thirty yeares expire S. maketh wast I bringeth an action of wast 1. Resolved by the exception of Wood and Underwood the soile is excepted and the woods growing c. are of abundance 2. The Wood remaines parcell of the Mannor because the Lessor had the intire freehold otherwise if he had leased for life with such an exception so if one lease a Mannor excepting the advowson for life the advowson is in grosse for life but if he grant the advowson for life it remaines appendant 3. By the acceptance of the third lease the said Lease of the Wood for 62. yeares was presently surrendered because the Lessee hath affirmed the Lessor to be able to Lease Saunders Case fo 12.41 Eliz. com banco In an Action of wast IF a man have Land in part whereof there is a Cole-myne appearing and he demise the Land to another for life or yeares the Lessee may dig for cole c. And the reason is for that the Myne is open at the time of the demyse c. and when he demyseth all his Lands it shall be intended that his meaning was that all the profit of the Land should passe c. but if the Myne be not open but within the Bowels of the Earth at the time of the demise 't is otherwise Also if a man have in his Lands hidden or unknowne Mynes and Lease the same Lands and all Mynes therein the Lessee may dig for them Rosses case 41. 42. Eliz. A Lease is made to A. and his Assignes for his life and the life of B. and C. this is a Lease for three lives and the Survivor of them Countesse de Salops Case fo 13.42 43. Eliz. banco regis SHe brought an action of the Case against Crompton and declared that shee demised to him a House at will Et quod ille tam negligenter improvide custodivit ignemsuum quod domus illa combusta fuit the defendant pleaded Non culpa and it was found not guilty And 't was adjudged that for the permissive wast no Action lyeth against the opinion of Brooke in Title wast 52. And the reason of this judgement was for that at the common Law no remedy lyeth for wast either voluntary or permissive against the Lessee for life or yeares because the Lessee hath interest in the Land by the act of the Lessor and it was his folly to make such a Lease and not to restraine him by Covenant condition c. And by the same reason Tenant at will shall not be punished for permissive wast But if Tenant at will commit voluntary wast as pulling downe of houses cutting of Trees a generall action of trespasse lyeth against him for that these doe amount to the determination of the will without the entry of the Lessor but it was agreed that in some Cases where there is confidence put in the party an action of the Case lyeth for negligence although the Defendant commeth to the possession by the act of the Plaintiffe as 12. E. 4.13 If one doe commit his Horse to one to keepe safely the Defendant Equum illum tam negligenter custodivit quod ob defectum bonae custodiae interijt an action upon the Case lyeth for this Breach of trust also 2. H. 7.11 If my Shepheard which I trust with my Sheepe and by his negligence they be drowned or otherwise perish an action upon the case lyeth against him but in this case at the Barre there was a demise at will made to the Defendant and no confidence repos'd in him wherefore it was ordered that the Plaintiffe should not recover by her Bill Case of Ecclesiasticall Persons 43. Eliz. fo 14. In the High Court of Parliament AT a Parliament holden in this Michaelmasterme it was resolved by the two chiefe Justices Popham and Anderson and diverse other Justices Assistants to the Lord of the
his warrant to bring the party before himselfe and it is good and sufficient in Law for it is most like that he hath the best knowledge of the matter and therefore most fit to doe Justice in that matter upon refusall to finde surety the Constable may commit him without a new warrant Gooches case 32. El. in banco le roy fol. 60. WRay chiefe Justice said that if A. make a fraudulent conveyance of his Lands to deceive a purchasor against the Statute of 27. El. and continueth in possession and is reputed as owner B entereth in communication with A. for the purchase and by accident B. hath notice of this fraudulent conveyance Notwithstanding he concludes with A. and takes his assurance In this case B. shall avoide the said fraudulent conveyance by the said Act notwithstanding the notice for the Act by expresse words hath made the fraudulent conveyance voyde as to the purchasor And for as much as that is within the expresse provision of the Statute it ought to be taken and expounded in suppression of fraud Resolved that fraud may be given in Evidence because the estate is voyde by the Act of 13. Eliz. and fraud is hatched in secret in arbore cava opaca And according to this opinion it was resolved Per tot ' Cur ' in communi banco Pasche 3o. Jac. where one Bullock had made a fraudulent estate of his Lands within the Statute of 27. El. to A. B. and C. and after offred to sell the same to one Standen and before the assurance by Bullock Standen had notice thereof and notwithstanding proceeded and tooke the assurance from Bullock Standen avoyded the former assurance of fraud by the said act for the notice of the purchasor cannot make that good which an Act of Parliament hath made voyde as to him And it is true Quod non decipitur qui scit se decipi But in this case the purchasor is not deceived for the fraudulent conveyance whereof he had notice is made voyde as to him by the Statute and therefore he knew it could not hurt him Sparries case 33. Eliz. in Scaccar fol. 61. IN action of Trover and convertion the defendant pleads that there is another action depending in the Kings Bench for the same Trover and good for in actions which comprehend no certeinty as assize or trespas this is no plea before a Count because thereby it is made certeine and then it is a good plea and not before but in this action and debt and detinue it is a good plea at the first because they are certeine that an action is depending in an inferiour Court is no plea. Cases of By-Lawes Chamberlaine de Londons case 32. El. in Banco le roy fol. 66. THe Inhabitants of a village without any custome may make Ordinances or By-Lawes for reparation of the Church or of high-wayes or any such thing which is for the publicke weale generally and in this case the consent of the greater part shall binde all without any custome vide 44. E. 3.19 But if it be for their owne private profit for that Towne as for their well ordering of their common of pasture or such like then without custome they cannot make by-Lawes And if it be a custome yet the greater part shall not binde all if it be not warranted by the custome for as custome hath created them so they ought to be warranted by the custome 8. E. 2. tit ass As pontage murage Tolle and such like as appeareth in 13. H. 4.14 In which cases the summes for reparations of the Bridge walls c. ought to be so reasonable that the Subject may have more benefit thereby then charge Clerks case 38. Eliz in communi banco fol. 64. KIng Edward 6. did incorporate the Towne of St. Albones and granted them to make Lawes and Ordinances c. The Tearme was kept there and the Major c. by assent of the plaintiffe assessed every Inhabitant for the charges in erecting of the Courts there and if any did refuse to pay c. to be imprisoned c. the plaintiffe being Burges refused to pay c. and the Major justified c and it was adjudged no plea c. For this Ordinance is against Magna Charta ca. 29. Nullus liber homo imprisonetur which act hath been confirmed divers times viz. thirty times and the assent of the plaintiffe cannot alter the Law in this case But it was resolved that the Major c. might inflict reasonable penaltie but not imprisonment which penaltie ought to be Levied by Distresse for which offence an action of Debt lyeth and the plaintiffe in this case had judgement Jeffrays case Michaelis 31 32. en Bank le Roy. fol. 66. WIlliam Jeffray Gent. brought a prohibition against Abraham Kenshley and Thomas Forster Churchwardens of Haylesham in Com' Sussex for that they sued him in Court Christian before Doctor Drury for certaine money imposed upon him without his assent for repaire of the Church That the Church-wardens with the assent of the greatest part of the Parishioners juxta quantitatem qualitatem possessionum reddit ' infra dict' parochiam existent Determined and agreed to make a taxation for repaire of the said Church and that notice of such assembly was given in the Church at which day the Church-wardens and greater part of the Parish which were there assembled made a taxation viz. every occupier of Land for every acre 4. d. c. Geffray dwelt in another Parish and declared that the Parishioners of every Parish ought to repaire their Church and not the Church of another Parish Cooke of councell with the defendant demurred in Law and after many arguments a Writ of consultation was granted And it was resolved that the Court Christian hath conusans de reparatione corporis sive navis Ecclesiae Britton who writ in 5. E. 1. And in the Statute of Circumspecte agatis but in Rebus manifestis errat qui authoritates legum allegat quia perspicuè vera non sunt probanda It was also resolved that although Geffray did dwell in another Parish yet for that he had Lands in the said Parish in his proper possession he is in the Law Parochianus de Haylesham But it was resolved that where there was a Farmor of the same Lands the Lessor that receiveth the rent shall not be charged but the Inhabitant is the Parishioner and the receipte of the rent doth not make the Lessor a Parishioner Diverse of the civill Lawyers certified the Court that the Church Wardens and a greater part of the Parishioners upon a generall warning assembled may make a Taxation by their Law and the same shall not charge the Land but the Person in respect of the Land for equality and indifferency and this was the first leading case that was adjudg'd reported in Our Bookes touching these matters and many causes after were adjudged thus and now it is generally received for Law The Lord Cheneys Case 33. Eliz.
Banco fol. 7. IF one be barred by plea to the Writte hee may have the same Writte againe if by plea to the action of the Writte he may have his right action If the plea be to the action and he be barred by Judgement upon demurrer confession or verdict in personall actions it is a barre for ever and in reall actions he is put to a Writte of higher nature as barre in assize barreth one in Entry in nature of an assize but he may have an assize of Mortdaumester c. But barre is not perpetuall if those who are barred have not the meere right therefore the heire in taile who is barred shall have the same action so of the successor of a Parson if he doth not pray in ayde of the Patron and Ordinary He who lost by default before the Statute of Westminster 2. cap. 4. was put to a Writte of right and if he could not have this Writte he was without remedy In case where a Writte of Entry in the post lyeth now no remedy was before the Statute of Marlebridge cap. 29. but a Writte of right See there divers inconveniences which insue upon the breach or alteration of the auncient and fundamentall rules of the Common Law Interest Reipublicae ut sit finis litium Where a Writte shall be brought by Journeys accounts Spencers case 45. Eliz. Com. Banco fol. 9. IF a formedon abate for undue summons the demandant may have another by Journeys accompts 1. Resol If a Writte abate by default of the demandant himselfe he shall not have another Writte by Journeys accompts otherwise it is if by default of the Clerke or Sheriffe as in this case If a Writte abate for nontenure of all he shall not have c. but if a Praecipe abate for non-tenure of parcell he shall have another so if it abate for joyntenancy of part of the demandant he shall not have a new Writte because he had notice otherwise it is of the part of the tenant And this Writte shall be alwayes betwixt the parties to the first Writte and of the same quantity of acres A Judiciall Writte shall never be sued by Journeys accompts because it shall never abate for forme 2. The second Writte is quasi a continuance of the first Writte therefore all pleas which relate to the purchase of the Writte shall be pleaded from the purchase of the first Writte and costs of the first Writte shall be recovered 32. E. 3. Journeys accompts 16. 15. dayes were allowed Jentlemans case 25. Eliz. concerning Judges of Courts fol. 11 IN the Hundred Courts the Sutors are Judges in the Court of Pypowders the Steward is Judge In a Leet the Steward is Judge In a Court Baron the Sutors which are by the common Law are Judges Rex sectatoribus Curiae c. Vobis mandamus c. ad judicium reddendum c. procedatis but in Redisseisin the Sheriffe is Judge by the Statute of Merton cap. 3. and in the Tourne Morrices case 27. Eliz. Com. Banco fol. 12. IT was adjudged that after the act of 28. H. 8. ca. 1. although joyntenants be compellable to make partition by Writte as well as Copartners yet they may not make partition by words as Copartners may doe by the common Law If two joyntenants make partition by Writte the warranty remaineth otherwise it is if it be by deed by Consent Cases of pardon 29. Eliz. fol. 13. BVrton Parson of Isbock in Leic was deprived Anno 12. El. for committing Adulterie and after by the generall pardon 2. Apr. 13. El. the offence of adulterie in t alia was pardoned before the 14. of February then last past And it was said that before the pardon that crimen adulterij praed transivit in rem judicatam and therefore the sentence should remaine in force And therefore untill the sentence were reversed the deprivation was in force But it was resolved that Burton by vertue of the said pardon is become Parson againe without any sentence declaring the said deprivation to be voyde For by the pardon the adultery which was the cause of the sentence is discharged and by consequence all that which did stand or depend upon the same foundation is also discharged vide 20. El. Dier A. was bound in a Statute of 20. li. to B. B. sued Execution and the Lands of A. were delivered in Execution and after B. maketh Defeasance to A. by Indenture that if A. doe pay to B. 8. li. at a certaine day that then the Statute to be voyde And it was adjudged that although the Statute was executed yet the Defeasance of the Statute was sufficient in Law to defeate as well the Statute as the Execution thereof For the Statute is the foundation of all and if that be defeated all that is builded on the same shall be defeated also 20. ass pla 7. Burglary was excepted out of the generall pardon of 28. Eliz. by that the attainder of burglary is excepted for the offence remaines after judgement and is the foundation of it Arundells case 36. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 14. AN Inditement of murther in King-streete in W. and the visne from W. and it was vitious for it ought to be from the most certaine place that is the Parish for W. being a Citie it shall be intended that it is greater then the Parish and therefore a new Venire facias was awarded Treports case 36. El. Banco Regis fol. 14. A. Tenant for life remainder in fee to B. both by Deed indented joyne in a Lease to Treport the question was whether the same shall be adjudged in Law the Lease of both of them or not And it was resolved that it was the Lease of A. during his life and the confirmation of B. And after the death of A. it was the Lease of B. and the confirmation of A. and because the plaintiffe had declared of a joynt demise of A. and B. it was adjudged against the plaintiffe in an Ejectione firmae If tenant for life and he in remainder joyne in a Lease rendring rent tenant for life shall have the rent during his life Edens case 37. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 15. RIens passa by Letters patents shall be tryed where the Land is not where the patent beares date for the Patent is not traversed but the effect of the issue is whether the Queene had the said Land to grant or not Colyers case 37. Eliz. Com. Banco fol. 16. ONe demiseth to his daughter for life and after to his brother paying 20. s. to J. S. the brother had fee for the summe to be paid by him for otherwise he may pay the 20. s. and die without satisfaction but if the payment be to be made out of the profits of the Land he shall have but for life for there he can be at no prejudice Wyldes case 41. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 16. A Man deviseth Lands to the husband and the wife and to the children of their bodies
none will buy their Wardships 5. After Tender and refusall if the heire be made Knight and marry he shall not forfeite the double value because he is out of Ward but immediatly the Lord shall have a Writte de valore maritagij This was the last Case that Sir John Popham chiefe Justice of England c. ever Argued Sir George Cursons case 7. Jac. Cur. Wardor fol. 75. SIr W. L. seised of a reversion expectant upon taile made to his sonne of land in Capite Covenants to stand seised to the use of his neece the sonne dyeth the King shall not have primier seisin 1. Resol It was Collusion apparent within the Statute of Marlebr cap. 6. to infeoffe the heire apparent and if he infeoffe others upon Collusion averrable but no averrement shall be where the remainder or reversion is left in a stranger or upon a Devise 2. Or otherwise to dispose in the Statute of 32. H. 8. have relation to wills onely for before the Statute every man might dispose of his lands by act executed 3. The Clause in the said Statute which saveth primier seisin to the King hath relation onely to acts executed for the King shall have without that primier seisin of the third part not devised but without that he shall not have it of any part conveyed by act executed 4. If the grandfather convey land to the sonne living the father this is out of the Statute otherwise if the father be dead and so a gift to a Collaterall Kinsman who is not heire apparent is out of the Statute for none will by intendment disinherit his heire to defeate the King of the Wardship or primer seisin and so is the experience of the Court of Wards Bullens case 5. Jacobi Com. Banco fol. 77. THe Lord may have a certeine summe pro certo letae for it shall be intended it was granted at the first by purchase of the Leete for the ease of the Tenants and in consideration of the Lords claiming of it at his owne costs every Eyre The issue was if the plaintiffe was a chiefe pledge and by speciall verdict he was found a Resiant and certified by the chiefe pledges to be a chiefe pledge and was amerced for his default It seemeth he was not Sed materia praedicta consopita fuit in arbitrio See 30. E. 3.23 of franke pledges Lord Abergavenies case Com. Banco fol. 78. A Judgement in an action of Debt is had against a joyntenant for life who afterwards releaseth to his companion all the right c. yet that moytie is liable to the Judgement and so it is of a rent charge during the life of the Releasor Sir Edward Phyttons case Com. Banco fol. 79. EXecutors may take benefit of the Kings generall pardon by which is enacted that all Subjects of the King their heires Successors Executors and Administrators shall be acquitted and discharged of all offences contempts c. and that shall be expounded most beneficially for the Subject And further doth give and grant all goods Chattells Debts c. forfeited And prohibiteth any Clerke to make out any Writte c. Provided that every Clerke may make forth cap. ut at the suite of the plaintiffe against persons outlawed to the intent to compell them to answer and that the partie shall sue forth a scir fac before the pardon in that behalfe shall be allowed which is as much to say having regard onely to the plaintiffe But in regard of the King it is an absolute pardon and grant of his goods and he is a person inabled against the King but not against the partie plaintiffe And every person by himselfe or his Atturney may plead this act for discharge Executors shall have restitution upon the Statute 21. H. 8. Also Administrators shall have a Writt of error upon the Statute 27. El as was adjudged in the Lord Mordants case 36. El. And yet these Statutes speake onely of the partie and not of the Executors or Administrators because no Writt can be against Executors they may plead it without Processe The End of the Sixth Booke THE SEAVENTH BOOK Postnati Calvins case 6. Jacobi Banco Regis fol. 1. R C. By his gardian bringeth an assize the defendants say the plaintiffe ought not to be answered Quia est alienigena natus 5o. Novembris Anno Domini Regis Angliae c. tertio apud E. infra regnum Scotiae ac infra ligeanciam Domini Regis Regni sui S. ac extra ligeanciam Regni sui Angl. c. the plaintiffe demurreth The Case was Adjourned into the Exchequer Chamber and was argued by two Justices every day and by the Chancellour and resolved by the Chancellour and all the Justices except Walmesley and Foster that the plaintiffe ought to be answered For these six demonstrative Conclusions drawne from the Law of Nature the Law of the Land Reasons of State and Authorities of Records and Booke Cases 1 Every one that is an Alien by birth may be or might have been an Enemy by accident but C. could never be an Enemy by any accident whatsoever ergo no Alien by birth 2. Whosoever are borne under one naturall ligeance due by the Law 〈◊〉 nature to one Soveraigne are naturall borne Subjects But C. was borne under one c. ergo a naturall borne Subject 3. Whosoever is borne within the Kings protection is no Alien But C. was borne under c ergo he is no Alien 4. Every stranger borne must at his birth be either amicus or inimicus but C. at his birth could neither be amicus nor inimicus because he was subditus ergo no stranger borne 5. Whatsoever is due by the Law of man may be altered but naturall legeance of the Subject to the Soveraigne cannot be altered ergo not due by mans Law Lastly whosoever at his birth cannot be an alien to the King of E. cannot be an alien to any of his Subjects of E. but C. at his birth could be no alien to the King of E. Ergo he cannot be an alien to any of the Subjects of E. the Maior and Minor both be Propositiones perspicuè verae and although Alienigena dicitur ab aliena gente yet that is all one as Alienae ligeantiae and arguments drawne from Etymologie are feeble for Saepenemero ubi proprietas verborum attenditur sensus veritatis amittitur yet when they agree with Law Judges may use them for Ornament and dâ—verse inconveniences would follow if the Plea against the Plaintiffe should be allowed For first it maketh legeance locall wereupon should follow first that legeance which is universall should be confined within locall limits 2. That the Subject should not be bound to serve the King in Peace or in Warre out of those bounds 3. It should illegitimate many which were borne in Gascayne Guyan Normandy c. and diverse others of his Majesties Dominions whilst the same were in actuall obedience And lastly this strange and new devised Plea inclineth too much to
the King dyes the Father is King and the Son Duke by the said Statute against the rules of Law 2. The Lands cannot be so annexed to the Duchie that they cannot be severed without Statute 3. The estate is limitted to cease when the King hath no first begotten Son and to revive when he hath which cannot be without Statute 4. It should be absurd that six being then created Earles that their creation should be firme and the Creation of the Prince void 5. In the Charter there is De communi consilio Praelatorum c. and in the end Per ipsum Regem totum concilium in Parliamento such an Act as beginneth Rex Statuit and alwayes reputed for a Statute shall not be drawne in question but if it be Rex ex assensu the Commons or Lords omitting the other part it is voide 2. The said Charter having the force of a Statute is good without aid of any other Statute and although the King in his Scire facias recite another Act for thâ—s surplus the writ shall not abate 3. The Prince had the Dukedome in Fee for it is an inheritance because 21. E. 3. 41. the Princesse was indowed and it is no estate taile because it is not limitted of what body it shall come but onely that they shall be Heires to the black Prince 4. Against a generall Statute Nul tiel recorde shall not be pleaded for although it be lost yet the Judges ought to take notice of it and this is such an one which concernes the Prince and the Statute of confirmations doth not extend unto it 1. Because this hath a speciall relation to certeine defects as Misnosiner c. 2. Patents are made good onely against the King saving the right of others therefore the Princes right is saved In a Scire facias the King or Prince may reply but the most formall way is for the Attourney to replie as here he did No Sonne of the King but his first begotten shall be Duke of C. although he be Heire apparent to the Crowne Calyes Case 26. Eliz. Banco regis fo 32. 1. REsolved that to maintaine an action against an Inkeeper for goods lost c. it ought to be a common June 2. He ought to be a Passenger therefore a Neighbour shall not 3. An inholder shall not answer for any thing but that which is Infra hospitium therefore if a Passenger require that his Horse be put to grasse the inholder shall not answer if he be stollen otherwise if he require it not 4. There ought to be a default in the Inholder or his Servants therefore if a Guest bring one with him who stealeth the goods the Inholder shall not be charged otherwise if the Hostler appoint one with him in his Chamber who doth it But an inholder shall not be charged if he require the Guest to put his goods in a Chamber and he leaves them in the Court but it is no excuse to the Inholder that he delivered the Key of the Chamber to the Guest or that no goods were delivered to him 5. The Hostler shall answer for Charters if they be stollen but not if a Guest be beaten and all this appeares by the Writ and the words of it Paynes Case 29. Eliz. com banco fo 34. A Feme Tenant in taile taketh Baron and hath issue who is heard to cry and dyeth the Feme dyeth without issue the Husband shall be Tenant by the courtesie for although the state of the Feme be determined yet it is Tacite implied in the guift that every Husband of a Feme inheritable to the said estate shall have the Land for his life after the death of the Feme if he be intitled to be Tenant by the courtesie If a Feme be delivered of a Monster this doth not intitle the Husband to be Tenant by the curtesie otherwise it is if the issue had humane shape but is blemished if a Feme be ripped and the issue taken out of her Wombe the Baron shall not be Tenant by the curtesie otherwise it is if the issue which they had dyes and Lands discends after A man shall not be Tenant by the courtesie but where his issue may inherit as heire to the Feme therefore he shall not be of a possession in Law because there he makes title from the auncester of the Feme and not from the Feme Barretry 30. Eliz. fol. 36. A common Barretor is a common maintainer of Suites or quarrells in Courts or in the Countrey As first in disturbance of the peace Secondly in taking and keeping of possession with force or deceite Thirdly by false calumniation and sowing of Quarrells but to indite him of it it ought not to be that he hath done so twice or thrice but that he is a common doer of them Grieslies Case 30. Eliz. com banco fo 38. BY the custome one is chosen in a Leete to be Constable who refuseth and departeth out of the Court the Steward imposeth a Fine of 5. l. upon him for which the Bailiffes of the Lord distreine and he brings a replevin 1. Resolved every Judge of record may assesse a reasonable fine upon any man who makes contempt or disturbance to the Court but a Judge who is not of record cannot 2. This fine heeds not to be afferred because the Statute of Mag. Ch. speakes of Amerciaments and not of Fines for a fine is imposed by the Court and an Amerciament by the Jury therefore the Judgement in an Amerciament is generall Quod sit in misericordia and after upon estreits directed to the Coroners they are afferred and the Statute is that a Noble man shall be Amerced by his Peers which is not used at this day because it is reduced to a certeinty Viz. A Duke to 10. l. and others to 5. l. but an Amerciament of an Officer of the Court or he who hath execution of Writs shall be afferred by the Court so of any who is Judge as Suitors If a Juror appeare and is adjourned to a day of which he makes default this shall be inquired by his Companions for he shall be fined to the value of his Land per annum which the Court cannot know 3. A distresse may be taken for a fine without custome or for an Amerciament which is lesse Whittinghams Case 45. Eliz. fo 42. IT was resolved that if there be Lord and Tenant an Infant and the Infant make a feoffement in fee and execute the same by livery of seisin by his owne hands and after dye without heires in this case the Lord shall not have the benefit of the escheate and the Feoffement is unavoidable There be three manner of privities Viz. privity in blood 2. Privity in estate 3. Privity in Law Privities in blood as heires in blood privity in estate as joyntenants Baron and Feme Donor and Donee Lessor and Lessee c. privities in Law as Lord by escheate Lord of a Villaine c. If a Lessee for life
Court voluntarily Aldreds Case 8. Jacobi fol. 57. WHen a man hath lawfull profit by prescription of time whereof the memory of man is not to the contrary other custome of the like time also cannot take the former away for the one custome is as ancient as the other As if a man have a way over the Lands of B. to his freehold Land by prescription of time B cannot alledge prescription or custome to stop the said way for it may be that before the time of memory the owner of the said Lands had granted such away without any stopping and so the prescription might have a lawfull beginning 29. Eliz. Banco regis Thomas Brand prescribed time out of memory to have the light of 7. Windowes towards a peece of Land of Thomas Mosely in the Citty of York but Mosely erected a new building upon the said peece of Land so neere c. as the light of the Windowes were stopped Brand brought his action on the Case and judgement was given for the Plaintiffe for it might be that before the time of memory the owner of that peece of Land did grant License to the owner of the Messuage to have the said 7. Windowes without stopping them and so the prescription might have a lawfull beginning If a man have a watercourse to his House for necessary uses if a Glover make a Lime-pit for Calf-skins so neere the said Course that the corruption doth corrupt the same an Action of the Case lyeth 13. H. 7. 26. 6. Likewise a man shall not make or erect a Swyne-sty so neere his Neighbours House as to annoy him with the contagion thereof John Lambs Case 8. Jacobi Starre-Chamber fol. 59. IT was resolved that every one that shall be convicted in case of Libelling ought to be eyther a contriver of the Libell or a procurer of the contriver or a malicious publisher thereof knowing it to be a Libell For if one read a Libell or heare the same read it is no publication for before he heare or read the same he cannot know the same to be a Libell or if he read or heare the same and laugh thereat this is no publication but if after he hath read or heard the same read he repeate the same or any part thereof in the hearing of others or if he write a Coppy thereof and doe not publish the same to others this is no publication of the Libell but it is good for him after he hath so written the same to deliver it to a Magistrate for then the act subsequent doth declare his intention precedent Robert Bradshawes Case 10. Jacobi fol. 60. LEssor for six yeares during the life of R. Covenants that he had power to make this Lease the Lessee brings Covenant and sheweth not that R. was in life nor what person had right and yet good because if R. were not in life at the time of the Lease made the Lease was absolute if he died after yet the Action lyeth and he needs not shew who had right for he had pursued the words of the Covenant and it lyeth not properly in his notice Mackallies Case In killing of a Serjeant c. 9. Jacobi fol. 65. FIve exceptions to the Indictment 1. The Arrest was in the night betweene five and six of the Clock in November at the suite of a Subject which being tortious the killing of the Serjeant is but Man-slaughter Non alloc 1. Because the Arrest may be at the Suite of a Subject in the night 2. Although that betweene five and six in November be in the night yet the Court is not bound to take notice of it without the shewing of the party as in case of Burglary 2. The Sunday is not Dies juridicus therefore the arrest that wast made upon it was Tortious c. Resol that judiciall acts shall not be done this day but ministeriall may for necessity 3. The Indictment is in Computat in parochia S. M. in W. emitting the Ward yet good as if one name the Towne he is not bound to say in what Hundered it is 4. and 5 the precept was to arrest him Infra liberiates L. and the arrest was in L. yet good because the Liberties of L. includes the City of L. it selfe 1. Exception to the verdict that the Indictment and the Verdict vary for the Indictment is that the arrest was by precept and by Verdict it is found that it was by custome without precept Answered that the precept is but circumstance and varience in it is not materiall having found the substance as if the Indictment be that he killed him with a Daggar and it is found that it was with a Sword so if he be indicted of murder and it is found man-slaughter this is good for Ex malitia is but circumstance 2. The Indictment may be generall Ex malitia c. because the Law imployeth malice and so the precept not materiall 2. The custome is not good to arrest one without summons it is good and if the processe be erroneous yet killing of him who did execute it is murder because he is not to dispute whether it be good or not and if any officer in doing his office be slaine this is murder and in such a case an officer is not bound to flie to the Wall as another is 3. The Arrest cannot be before the plaint entered of record before the Sheriffe Resp it may by the custome after entry of it in the Porters Booke 4. The Serjeant ought to shew at whose Suite the Arrest is and in what Court and for what cause true it is if the party submit himselfe but here he was killed before he could speake and if they kill him before the Arrest knowing that he came for that purpose this is murder 5. It is not found that the killing was fellony Resp It is sufficient for the Jurors to find the killing which is the substance and leave it to the Judgement of the Court if it be fellony 6. The Serjeant did not shew his Mace He ought not 1. Because he was commonly knowne 2. The party arrested is to obey at his perill and if shewing of the Mace be requisite it will be a warning to the party to flie 7. The arrest ought to be upon request after the plaint entered the request may be before or after 8. The verdict is repugnant for they find that the plaint was entered of record 17. Nov. and after they found that it was 19. Nov. this is more strong against the Prisoners because the entry was before the Arrest 18. Nov. 9. The Plaint is without forme this is not to the purpose for it is but a remembrance to draw the count by at large after And Mackalley and the other prisoners were Executed at Tyborne Peacocks Case 9. Jacobi in Camera Stellata fol. 70. SIr George Reynell Plaintiffe Richard Peacock and others Defendants J.H. J.B. Commissioners to examine Peacock upon Interr and Peacock being examined would have declared all the
defeasible Title the other shall distraine for the moity of the Seigniory and the Act of the Coparcener shall not prejudice her There are foure manner of Avowries 1. Upon his very Tenant 2. Upon his very Tenant by the manner where the Tenant had but a particular estate 3. Upon his Tenant by the manner when the Lord had but a particular estate 4 Upon the matter in the Land as within his fee but the Lord hath liberty to Avow according to the Common Law Thoroughgoods Case 9. Jacobi fol. 136. TEnant in fee infeoffeth one by Deed indented and delivereth it upon the Land in the name of seisin this is good and hath a double operation at one instant Viz. to deliver the Writing as a Deed and to deliver seisin of the Land according to the Deede 1. Resolved this is his Deed although he doth not say so but delivers it in the name of seisin for delivery is good without any words if one deliver a Deed to one as an escrow to be his Deed upon performance of conditions this is his Deed presently otherwise if he deliver it to a stranger so words are good without actuall delivery as if he saith take it like to a livery within view If the Obligee deliver the Obligation to the Obligor to redeliver the Obligor may retaine it for the words to redeliver are void 2. Delivery of the deede upon the Land amounteth not to livery and seisin but it doth if delivered in the name of seisin so of any other thing or if he saith I deliver you seisin without delivering any thing this is good also Beaumonts Case 10. Jacobi fol. 138. I. B. and E. his Wife Tenants in speciall Taile the remainder to the Heires of the Baron I. B. levies a Fine to K. E. 6. who grants to the Earle of H. in fee I. B. dyeth E. enters the Earle of H. confirmes her estate to have to her and the Heires of the body of I. B. E. dyeth seised having issue F. B. who accepts a fine Sur conusans de droit tantum with Proclamations and dyes having issue Sir H. and I. Sir H. in Ward to the K. after full age and before livery Covenanteth to stand seised to the use of himselfe and his heires Males of his body and dyes having issue onely a Daughter in Ward whether shee or I. B. shall have the Land c. 1. Resolved that E. had an estate taile and the Statute of 4. H. 7. c. 24. which inableth the Baron to barre the issue saveth the right of the Feme if shee enter or c. and one may have an estate taile which cannot discend as if the Sonne in the life of the Father levyeth a fine the Father remaineth Tenant in taile still although it cannot discend and E. here hath an estate taile so long as shee liveth or the Heires in taile remaine 2. The Confirmation is void for he who did confirme had but a possibility which passeth not by the confirmation and if he had a reversion in fee yet it should be void 1. Because the taile which the Feme had was confirmed which cannot descend 2. The confirmation doth not add a descendible quallity where he who should have it is disabled to receive by discent 3. This would in effect repeale 4. H. 7. 32. H. 8. two of the principall Pillars of the Law 4. 5. If Tenant in Dower grants her estate there is a discendible quality in the Heire to bring wast against Tenant in Dower and although the Heire confirme her estate for life and after shee assigneth it to I. S. who committeth wast yet the action of wast is maintainable against her Pari ratione in the Case at Barre in regard the confirmation doth not inlarge the estate of E. it cannot add unto it a discendible quallity 6. There are but three manner of Confirmations Viz. Perficiens Crescens aut diminuens and the Confirmation in this Case is none of them and if E. had no power to levy a fine or suffer recovery the reason is because she cannot barre that which was barred before by her Husband but this point was not now in Question The End of the Ninth Booke THE TENTH BOOK The Case of Suttons Hospitall Baxter Plaintiffe Sutton and Law Defendants in Trespasse in the Kings Bench and adjourned into the Exchequer Chamber and judgemet given against the Plaintiffe 1. Obj. BY the Parliament 7. Jacobi the Hospitall was Founded at H. in Essex Ergo the incorporation made after by the Kings Letters Patents is void and the Charterhouse is not given by the said Statute because S. purchased it after 2. Sutton who had License to Found an Hospitall before the Foundation dyed 3. The K. cannot name the House and Lands of S. to be an Hospitall because in Alieno solo 4. Every Corporation ought to have a place certaine but here the License is to found an Hospitall at or in the Charterhouse Ergo before that S. had made it certaine there was no incorporation also the place of Corporation ought to be certaine by Meates and Bounds and a place knowne will not serve 5. The King intended to make an incorporation presently which cannot be before that S. name a Master 6. Governors cannot be untill there be poore in the Hospitall Ergo S. calleth it in his Will his intended Hospitall 7. The Foundation cannot be without the words Fundo erigo c. and before such Foundation a Stranger cannot give Lands unto it 8. The Master was named at will where he ought to be for life and have freehold in the Lands also the Hospitall must be Founded before a Master be named 9. The bargaine and sale made by S. is void 1. Because the Money paid by the Governours in their private capacity shall not inure to them in their politick capacity 2. The Habendum is to them upon trust which cannot be in a Corporation 3. Because as before no Hospitall was Founded 10. The King cannot make Governours of a thing not in Esse To the first it was answered that the Letters Patents recite the preamble of the Act whereby and in many parts of the Act it appeareth that the incorporation was to be In futuro when it shall be erected and the Statute doth not give any Lands unto it but power to give without License of alienation and mortmaine and it appeareth by the Letters Patents that the erection precedes the License 2. The License is to him his Heires Executors c. at any time hereafter and the words of incorporation are in the present and so the incorporation precedeth the execution of this License 3. Although the King gave the name yet S. devised it and assented to it and the K. did it at his Suite 4. The K. makes an Hospitall of all the premises so that it is certaine and as to that which was said that a place uncertaine cannot be an Hospitall It was answered that a Mannor may be which is
devise of Land purchased after 2. The statute doth not regard this seck reversion but inheritances of annuall value Resp To the first that this reversion shall hinder the devise by the words of the Statute for he had a reversion of Lands holden but although the Statute saith that he may alien two parts by act executed or will if he alien to one of the three uses by act executed he may devise the reversion for the Statute is to be intended of an intire Alienation and where the Statute saith in reversion or remainder it is to be intended that the devisor be seised of such a remainder which drawes wardship To the second it was answered that things which of their nature are seck are out of the Statute but not things which of their nature are of annuall value but are not of value in respect of some Lease or gift Absque abliquo inde reddendo and therefore seck reversions are devisable by the said Statutes but if they be not yet they shall hinder the devises of other Lands To make one able to devise by those Statutes the time of Having Holding and disposing must concurre and therefore if a grant to the second Sonne here had beene in fee although with power of revocation the devise had been good because he had no Lands In Capite at the time of the devise if the Father conveyeth his Land to the use of his younger Sonne the eldest being within age after the death of his Father he shall be in ward although nothing discend A true Child and not in reputation is within the Statute and if the Sonne purchase Land Bona fide of his Father this is out of the Statute because it is not for his advancement If Tenant in socage devise and after purchase Land in Chivalry the devise is void for a third part but if Tenant in Chivalry and socage devise all and after aliens the Land holden this is good To make division that the King shall have a third part holden the Lands shall be taken according to their value at the time of the death of the Devisor The time of provision that a third part must discend needs not concurre with the time of alienation but it is sufficient that he had it at the time of his death The estate to any of the three purposes ought to continue to the time of death and the Tenure must till after death to make it within the Statute and the estate also of Lands holden ought to continue after death therefore if Tenant in taile in Capite devise socage Land and dye without issue this is good so privity must continue after death therefore if he who made the conveyance be attainted this is out of the Statute The uses to the second Sonne are in contingency and not executed by 27. H. 8. by the power to make Leases and devise reserved to the feoffor and therefore the fee is in the feoffor in the meane time so that having disposed of it and being seised of it he cannot devise the Land purchased after It was Objected that the Statute saith lawfully executed in his life but here no use was to be executed in the second Sonne untill after his death It was Answered that after his death the uses were derived out of the feoffement and so are as it were executed in his life It was holden by the Chiefe Justice that the remainder to the second Sonne is contingent in regard no alienation is found to be made by the Eldest and if there had been then it would be repugnant that after alienation the Land should remaine to the second Sonne and so Quacunq via data the remainder as this Case is cannot vest in him but this point was not resolved by the Court. 2. The revocation is good although the Indenture precedeth the feoffement and that the uses are in contingency and that the revocation is but in part and the Chiefe Justice held that the Eldest Sonne had but a terme determinable and the second an estate taile But in this the Kings Bench and Common pleas differ in Opinion and that if Lands be devised to one and the Heires of his body for 500. yeares the Executors shall have it and not the Heire and the devisee may alien it for it cannot be intailed and so in Peacocks Case 28. Eliz. Banco Regis was it resolved Doctor Leyfields Case 8. Jacobi fol. 88. in Trespasse IN Trespasse for Corne taken at O. C. the Defendant pleads that Q. Eliz. granted the Rectory of O. C. to C. P. without shewing the Letters Patents who demised to G. P. for 8. yeares if the said C. P. so long live and that he as servant of G. P. tooke the Corne and avers the life of C. the Plaintiffe demurreth because the plea amounteth to the generall issue and it was adjudged in the K. Bench that the barre was insufficient because the Defendant shewed not the Letters Patents and Error was brought in the Exchequer-Chamber because the plea amounts to the generall issue because the Defendant gave no colour wherein judgement ought not to be given against the Defendant but onely to answer over 2. Because he is not bound to shew the Letters Patents It was answered that colour shall not be given for colour shall not be given where the plea goeth to the barre of the right for it would be in vaine to give colour of right and to barre him if he had right as if a collaterall warranty fine Statute be pleaded or if he claimes by a waife otherwise where he pleads a discent for this doth not barre the right but the possession he who claimes by sale in a Market overt shall not give colour if he pleads generally but if he pleads that I. S. was possessed as of his owne goods and sold them in a Market overt or waived them there he shall give colour because he confesseth no interest in the Plaintiffe 2. If the Defendant claimes by the Plaintiffe he shall not give colour 3. If the plea be to the Writ or action of the Writ no colour shall be given 4. Colour shall not be given in case of Tithes for to whomsoever the Lands belong the Tithes belong to the Parson 1. Colour ought to be a doubt to the Laygents 2. It must have continuance 3. It must be such a colour that if it be effectuall will maintaine the Action 4. It ought to be given by the first conveyance 2. Resolved Lessee for yeares of Lessee for life of the K. must shew the Letters Patents for he who is privy in estate or interest or who justifieth in right of a Party or privy although he claime but part must shew the first deed and the reason that deeds are shewed to the Court is that the Judges and Jury that which respectively to them belongs shall judge of the sufficiency thereof therefore a deed shall not be suffered to be given in evidence by Witnesses or Copy except it be burned
Lands to the use of himselfe and of the heires males of his body And for default thereof to the use of the Queene her heires and successors After the Tenant in tayle in possession suffereth a common recoverie with voucher And whether it was a barre to the issue in tayle was the question And it was adjudged that the issue in tayle was barred for good considerations are too general to raise any use without speciall averment that valuable or other good consideration was given Resolved that the Land should continue in his name and bloud is not a consideration to raise a use to the Queene though the limitation to her were for the preservation of the tayle against discontinuances and barres for there wants quid pro quo Resolved if he had said in consideration that the Queene is the head of the weale publique and hath the care and charge as well to preserve peace as for to repell hostility yet 't is no good consideration for Kings ex officio ought to governe their Subjects in tranquillity which is implyed in the word King And admit the consideration had been sufficient to raise a use to the Queene yet that would not preserve the estate tayle by force of the Act 34. H. 8. for no estate tayle is preserved by the said Act except the same estate tayle be of the creation or provision of the King and not where the estate tayle is given or created of a common person without provision of the King as may appeare by the preamble of the Act. Resolved that before the Statute of 34. H. 8. a common recovery barred a tayle created by the King Lanes Case 29. Eliz. fo 16. THe Queene seised of a Mannor in right of her Crowne by her Steward granted coppie-hold Lands parcell thereof to one by coppie according to the custome in Fee And after the Queene under the Exchequer Seale made a Lease of the same Lands to another for 21. yeares who granted the same Tearme to the coppie-holder and after the Queene reciting the Lease for yeares granted the reversion thereof in Fee the Tearme of 21. yeares expired The Patentee of the reversion entreth upon the coppie-holder and the entrie was adjudged good Resolved that the Lease under the Exchequer Seale was good by the usage there for the course of every Court is as a law of which the common law takes notice without alledging of it in pleading and every Court at Westminster is bound to take notice of the Customes of other Courts otherwise of Courts in the Countrey and the order of Exchequer is to make Leases by Committimus such land Resolved that the estate of the Coppie-holder was determined by the acceptance of the Lease for yeares And so it was adjudged against the Coppie-holder for notwithstanding that the Coppie-holders estate is taken to be but an estate at will yet the custome hath so established the estate of the Coppieholder that he is not removeable at the will of the Lord so long as he performes his customes and services and by the same reason the Lord cannot determine his interest by any act that he can doe And so it hath been adjudged many times And the aceptance of this Lease was the proper act of the Coppie-holder Resolved that by the severance of the free-hold from the Mannor the Coppiehold estate is not extinguished Baldwyns Case 31. Eliz. fo 23. THings which lye in grant and take their essence and effect by delivery of a Deed without other ceremony as rent or common out of Lands c. by the premisses of the Deed to one and his heires habendum to the grantee for yeares or life this habendum is repugnant to the premisses for the Fee passeth by the premises by the delivery of the Deed and therefore the habendum is voyd And when a man giveth Lands by Deed in Fee by the premisses habendum to the Lessee for life there the habendum is voyd and when livery is made the effect of the Deed shall be taken the most strongly against the Feoffor and the best for the Feoffee When a ceremony is requisite to the perfection of an estate in the premisses limitted and to the estate limitted in the habendum no ceremony is requisite but onely the delivery of the Deed although the habendum be of meaner estate then the premisses the habendum shall stand good and qualifie the generalitie of the premisses as a Fee granted in the premisses habendum for yeares it is for yeares and no inheritance Note There is a diversity betwixt the estate implied in the premisses and expressed as if A. grant a rent to B. this is an estate for life but if the habendum be for yeares this is good and qualifies the implication of the premisses Case of Bankrupts 31. Eliz fo 25. REsolved that a grant or assignement of goods by a Bankrupt after the Commission awarded which is matter of Record of which every one ought to take notice and though to a Creditor in satisfaction of his debt is voyd and that a sale of such goods by the Commissioners is good Which sale by the Statute of 13. of the Queene ought to be equall to every one rate and rate like according to the quantity c. And the Court resolved that the proviso in the said Statute concerning gifts bona fide doth not make any gift good but excludes them out of the penalty c. Commissioners may sell by Deed without Inrollment and though they have not seene the goods agreed that the distribution ought to be severall not joynt for the one debt may be greater then the other and in this case the Jury found that the Commissioners sold the goods to three Creditors joyntly but further that the Bankrupt was indebted to them in 273. pounds which shall be intended a joynt debt and so good Resolved that the act giveth benefit to such as will come and not to them that refuse vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt and every Creditor may take notice of the Commission being matter of Record Bettisworths Case 33. Eliz. in communi Banco fo 31. A Lease for yeares was made of one Messuage one Close called Raynolds and of divers other Lands in Dale and afterwards the Lessee being in the house the Lessor entred into the same Close and maketh a Feoffment of the Messuage and of the Lands therewith demised and maketh livery in the same Close and afterwards the Lessee reentreth into the said Close And if this was a good Feoffment and livery of seison of the said Close the Lessee nor any for him being in the said Close was the question And it was adjudged that the livery and seison was voyd as well for the Close as for the Messuage and the other Land therewith demised For the Possession of the Messuage which is his Castle is a good possession of the Lands therewith demised and it matters not whether livery be made on the Land within view of the
a Stranger be not in another part of the House but this was before 39. Eliz. cap. 15. whereby clergy is taken away without putting any feare if he rob any man of above the value of five shillings Accessory before in robbing a House in the day is ousted of Clergy by 4. 5. Phiâ— Mary Accessory in robbing a Booth in the night or day or out House upon 39. Eliz. shall have his Clergy Nota Although a Statute takes away Clergy from the principall yet the accessory before or after shall have it and where by statute for any offence a man is ousted of his Clergy the indictment must containe the offence with the circumstances in the Statute Dyer 99. and 183. And A. P. was ordered to be hanged in Chaines c. Metcalfs Case 12. Jacobi fol. 38. In Accompt IUdgement is given against M. Quod computet ideo in misericordia quia prius non computavit and before finall Judgement Error is brought 1. Resol It lyeth not 1. Because the Writ of Error saith Si juditium inde redditum sit which shall be intended of the principall Judgement as the Feast of St. M. shall be intended the principall Feast and the Feme shall be received upon default of her Baron after judgement of admeasurement before the principall judgement 2. It shall be intended an intire judgement therfore in an action against two if one plead to the issue and the other confesseth and judgement given against him he shall not have error before the Plea determined against the other for otherwise there would be a failer of right for the Kings Bench cannot proceed upon the Record nor the Common place because it is removed 3. The first judgement is not ad grave damnum for by that he looseth nothing but judgement of the arrearages and damages is the end of the originall 4. This is not properly a Judgement but an Award of the Court as ouster of ayde in partitione facienda an awarde quod partitio fiat c. which are but interlocutory and not definitive 5. They have day by the Roll untill the last judgment but if a Felon dye after the exigent awarded and before attainder a Writ of Error lyeth for necessity for otherwise his goods are forfeited by awarding of the exigent without remedy if diverse are sued by severall Praecipes and Judgement given against one he shall have error before judgement given against the other and if error be in the originall the tenor onely shall be certified for otherwise the Court cannot proceede against the others 2. It was Resolved That the Record is not removed because untill finall Judgement be given the Chiefe Justice of the Common place hath no authority to send it and they may proceed notwithstanding the Roll be marked Mittitur Richard Godfreys Case 12. Jacobi fol. 42. TWelve chiefe pledges according to the custome of the Mannor to present at the Leet that every one of themselves ought to pay for themselves 10 s. pro certo letae the Stewart imposeth a Fine of 6 l. upon them the Lord distreineth for the Fine and certainty of Leet one of the pledges brings Replevin and judgement was given for the Plaintiffe 1. Resol The Fine is not well assessed for it ought to be severall and not joynt as it is because the offence is severall and although that the offence be joynt yet the Fine shall be severall as in disseisin and trespasse But for the incertainty of the persons and infinitenesse of the number many may be fined together as a Towne for the escape of a Felon and the reasonablenesse and excessivenesse of the Fine shall be determined by the Judges Excessus in re qualibet jure reprobatur communi as excessive distresse excessive ayde and excessive amerciament are against the Common Law 2. If the Fine be imposed erroneously it may be avoyded by Plea for he had no other remedy 3. The Lord cannot distraine pro certo Letae without prescription because it is against common right but he may for a Fine or amercement but for an amercement in a Court Baron the Lord must prescribe a Fine because it is assessed by the Court needs not to be affered but an amercement must be affered by the Countrey 4 Admitting that he may distraine pro certo Letae he shall have a returne although hee had not cause to distraine for the Fine for where one brings an Action for two things and it will not lie for one of them it shall abate onely for that if he cannot have a better action for it but if he may it shall abate for the whole as in a Formedon of Land and of an advowson the Writ shall stand for the Land so if a man avow for diverse Rents arreare and it appeareth that parcell is not yet due yet the avowry is good for the residue but if a man bring a Writ of Entry in nature of an Assize of two Acres where it appeareth that for one Acre he ought to have a Writ of Entry in the per there all shall abate for this extends not to the action but to the Writ onely Richard Lifords Case 12. Jacobi fol 46. IN trespasse the Defendant pleads that J. L. was seized in fee and demised to T. S. and M. P. excepting Trees above twenty one yeares growth if not decayed for their lives and covenanted to stand seized de tenementis predictis cum pertinentijs superius dimissis to the use of R. L. in taile c. and the Defendant as Servant to the sayd R. L. entered and sold Trees and Judgement was given against the Plaintiffe 1. Resol That the Trees notwithstanding the exception remaine parcell of the inheritance and are not Chattels but shall descend to the Heire for the Law doth not favour severance of the Trees from the Land therefore if one bargaine and sell Land upon which there are Trees they shall not passe without inrolement 2. If there had not been such an exception the generall interest of them is in the Lessor and the Lessee had but a particular interest in them and the Lessor may sell them without license of the Lessee to take effect after the Lease determined and tithes shall not be payd for them because they are parcell of the inheritance 2. By the exception of them the soile is not excepted but onely so much as sustaineth the Tree and if he by licence of the lessee root them up the lessee shall have the soile but by exception of Wood the Land it selfe is excepted if an Acre or an advowson be severed from the Mannor by exception upon a Lease for life it shall not be parcell of the Mannor againe otherwise of trees for they were not severed in facto because they grow out of the Land 3. A thing in possession cannot be parcell of a reversion upon an estate for life but Trees which grow out of the Land and Fish or Deer in the Land may and shall passe with it
4. In this Case by grant of the reversion generally or of the Tenements the Trees passe for the inheritance of all the Land passeth and thereby the Trees annexed to it the disseisee by his entry shall have the Corne upon the ground as well as the Grasse by relation of continuance of possession but this relation is not of effect to have a trespasse against any but the first disseisor for in fictione juris semper aequitas existit and the emblements shall be recovered in damages 5. In the Case at Barr by exception of the Trees power is reserved to the lessor or his servants to enter and show the Trees to the Vendee Cuicunque aliquis quid concedit concedere videtur id c. 6. The plea in Barr is insufficient for he showeth that there was another joyntenant for life not named in the Writ and demands Judgement if action which is an unapt conclusion 2. The Plea is double one to the Writ another to the Action 3. He pleads the entry of the lessees for life which is surplusage 4. Hee averreth not that the Trees which were sold were nor Dotards which are excluded out of the exception but that they de jure pertinebant to R. L. which is not formall but upon all the matter there appeared sufficient cause to give Judgement against the Plaintiffe and therefore by the rule of the Court Quaerens nil capiat per billam The Case of the Taylors of Cloaths c. of Ipswich 12. Jacobi fol. 53. THe Taylors of I. make an Ordinance that none shall exercise the Trade in I. if he have not been an Apprentice for seven yeares and if hee doe not appeare before them to be approved upon forfeiture of five Marks and for breach of it bring debt the Defendant pleads that he was reteined by A. P. to be a domestick Servant and that he made Garments by his command 1. Resol At the Common Law none may be prohibited to exercise any Trade although he hath never been an Apprentice and be ignorant but if he misdoe any thing an action of the Case lyeth 2. This Ordinance for so much as is not prohibited by the Statute of 5. Eliz. is against Law for after seven yeares Apprentiship he may exercise his Trade without allowance of any 3. The Statute of 5. Eliz. doth not prohibite the private exercise of any Trade in a Family therefore this is out of the said Ordinance 4. The Statute of 19. H. 7. cap. 7. doth not corroborate any Ordinance against Law if it be allowed but the allowance dischargeth the penalty of 40 l. for putting in use any ordinances which are against the Prerogative of the King or the common profit of the people and Judgement was given Quod querentes nil caperent per billam Edward Savells Case 12. Jacobi fol. 55. AN Ejectione firmae lyeth not of a Close but it must be of a certaine number of Acres and the nature of them must be shewed A Writ shall not abate for want of order Viz. Of a House before Land c. and judgement was stayed Benthams Case 12. Jacobi fol. 56. IF damages or costs are omitted or not well assessed by the Jury if the Plaintiffe release them he may have his judgement and it shall not for that be reversed Insufficient assessement of damages and no assessing is all one Doctor Fosters Case concerning Recusants 12. Jacobi fol. 56. AN Information was preferred against a Recusant by an Informer Tam pro domino rege quam pro seipso before the recusant was convicted for 220. l. that is 20. l. a Moneth for a 11. Moneths absence from the Church c. And judgement given against the Defendant 1. Resolved that he may be convicted to satisfie the Statute of 23. Eliz. in this same Suite and convicted shall be taken for attainted for he shall forfeit nothing before judgement 2. The Branch of distribution in the Act of 23. Eliz. extendeth as well to the clause of penalty for recusancy as to that of hearing or saying Masses for it is all one to say shall forfeite and shall forfeite to the King 2. Diverse acts of Parliament give the penalty to the King and yet after make a distribution thereof to another who will sue as 3. H. 6. cap. 3. 3. H. 7.3 3. He against whom judgement is given upon demurrer or default or otherwise is convicted within the Statute for he is attainted which implieth it for it is so found by the Judges so by the Statute of 8. H. 6. treble damages are given where a disseisin is found to be with force this extends to a judgement by Nihil dicit or default 4. The Statute of 28. Eliz. doth not take away the Statute of 23. which giveth liberty to the informer c. for 1. It is made for more speedy execution of it 2. It doth not alter the suite of the party but of the King and leaveth the Informer as he was before 3. The Act of 28. giveth not the penalty to any new person for it was given to the K. by 23. Eliz. 4. The Statute of 28. extends onely to Indictments and toucheth not informations 5. The Defendant is not within 28. Eliz. if he be not convicted at the suite of the K. Ergo this is left as before 6. Because the Statute is in the affirmative and they may stand together but the Statute of 28. alters the Statute of 23 in this that it confineth Suites against Recusants in the K. Bench or Assizes c. which clause extends as well to the suite of the informer as of the Queene and the Statute of 35. Eliz. and 3. Jacobi inlarge the Jurisdiction as to Suites of the K. and touch not the suite of the party 5. The Statute of 35. taketh not away the Action popular given by 23. for it was made to give more speedy remedy and not to take it away a feme Covert is within the Statute of 23. and 1. Eliz. but before the Statute 35. Eliz. if a Feme Covert had been indicted of recusancy the forfeiture should not have been levyed of the goods of the Husband because he was not party thereunto otherwise in an Information or Debt brought by the informer and in that that the Statute of 35. is that the K. shall recover all the paines c. in such sort c. this alters the remedy onely as to the Queene for now shee may proceede by action as for recovery of any other Debt by the Common Law in such manner as 1. H. 7. c. 1. giveth a Formedon against Parnor of the profits c. also 35. Eliz. is in the affirmative and although it giveth the penalty of 20. l. by the Moneth yet it taketh not away 1. Eliz. which giveth 12. d. for every Sonday and Holy day and where this Statute saith that the conviction shall be in the K. B. or at the Assizes yet the Justices of Peace and others authorized by 23. may take