the Form of the statute aforesaid untill he shall have levyed the debt and damages aforesaid And in as much as that command shall be executed he shall make appeare here in Cr. Anim. by the letters of the same Bishop sealed c. T 18. Iac. Rot. 3057. Brownlow Essex ss Whereas Iohn Hill lately in our court before our Justices at Westminster by the consideration of the same court had recovered against Mary Wroth late of London widdow otherwise called M. W. c aswell a certaine debt of 400 l. as 80 s. which c. whereof she is convicted the said Iohn afterwards came into our said court and by the statute c. chose to be delivered to him all the goods and chattles of the said Mary besides Oxon and cattle of her plough and likewise the moyety of all her lands and tenements of which the same Mary in Crastino S. Trin. last past upon which day the judgment aforesaid was given against her or at any time afterwards was seised without delay Entry of an Elegit after an elegit he should cause to be delivered to the same Iohn by reasonble price and extent to hold to him the goods and chattles aforesaid as his proper goods and chatties and also to hold to him the moyety aforesaid as his free tenement to him and his assignes according to the form of the statute aforesaid untill the debt damages should be levied thereof and in asmuch c. he should make appeare to our Justices here at Westminster in Cr. Pur. S. Mariae last past And you at that day returned to our Justices at Westminster a certaine Inquisition taken before you at S. L. in your county the 12. day of Dec. last past by the oath of 12. c. taken by which it is found that the same Mary at the said Cr S. Trinitat and after that day was seised in her demesnes of Fee tenant for terme of life of and in the Mannor and cheife mesuage of L. al. L. with all their right members and appurtenances c. And further that the same Mary at the said day of the judgment aforesaid given or at any time afterwards had any other goods or chattells or any other or more Mannors lands tenements in your County which to the knowledg of the Jurors of the Inquisition aforesaid could be extended or appraised you further retorned to our Justices at the same day that none came to you on the behalf of the said Iohn to pray deliverance to be made to him of the moyety of the mannor and Tenements aforesaid by the inquisition aforesaid found so that to further execution of the said writ you could not proceed whereupon the same Iohn came into our said Court saying that the same Mary a the time of the judgment aforesaid given and afterwards had divers lands and Tenements in your County to the value of 40 l besides the Mannor and Tenements in the inquisition aforesaid specified and also was possessed of divers goods and chattles to the value of 100 l. which you could have extended and apprised and delivered to the same Iohn And therefore wee command you as more times we have commanded you that all the goods and Chattles of the same Mary besides Oxon c. And likewise the moyety c. besids the same mannor and Tenements in the Inquisition aforesaid specified of which the same Ma. at the time of the judgment aforesaid given or at any time afterwards was seised possessed of and also the moyety of the Mannors and Tenements in the inquisiton aforesaid specified you cause to be delivered to the said Iohn by reasonable price and extent to hold as his Free tenement to him and his assignes according to the form of the statute c. untill the debt and damages be thereof levyed And in asmuch as you shall have executed this our command you make appeare c. SVff ss Whereas E. T. and Mary his wife in our Court before our Justices at Westminster by the consideration of the same Court had recoverd against Iohn Addams 20 l. for the value of the dower of the same Mary of one messuage and one Garden with the appurtenances in Bury S. Ed. from the time of the death of R. Cage her late husband Entry of an Elegit for the value in Dower As for theire damage which they had by occasion of the detayning of the said dower whereof he is convicted And the same Io. and Mary afterwards came in to our said Court and by the statute therein provided chose to be delivered to them c. As in others to hold to them and their assignes according to the Forme of the statute aforesaid untill the said 20 l. for the value and damages aforesaid shall be thereof levyed c. in asmuch c. he should make appeare here Men. Pas c. P 29. or 30. Eliz. Rot. 651. Tender of the body in execution in discharge of the Manucaptors London ss Be it remembred that the third day of May that same terme came here into the court M. F. in this own person And offered his body in execution upon the judgment for damges cost and charges which W. F. in the Queens Court here recovered against him as in a certaine action of trespasse upon the case according to the Form of a certaine Recognizance here by the same M. and certaine Henry Lues of the Parish c. Butcher and Giles Holden of the Parish c. haberdasher in Mich. term Ann. Reg. Regin 27 and 28. acknowledged for in discharge of his Manucaptors aforesaid c. And hereupon William Knight attorney of the said W. F. by the court here conferred with if he would commit the body of the said M. in execution for the debt and damages aforesaid to the prison of the Fleet there to stay upon that occasion or not said that not Therefore aswell the said Manucaptors as the said M. from the Recognizance aforesaid and summes of money contayned in the same Recognizance by the Court here are discharged c. Tender of the body in execution after judgment had against the principall in discharge of his â—ureties M 9. Jac Rot 2739. H 10. J. Rot 3241. H. 22. J Rot. 2429 Errour brought T 20. Eliz. Rot. 125. Between Younger and Tompson Afterwards to wit such a day An. c. came here into the Court W. T. in his proper person and aswell for his owne proper indemnity as of his suerties aforesaid prayeth that he by the court here may be committed to the prison of the Lady the Queen of the Fleet by occasion of the judgment aforesaid there to stay untill c. And L. and T. Manucaptors of the said W of their Manucaptions and acknowledgment in this behalf made by the court here are fully discharged c. And afterwards Error was entred upon the Roll and the Record sent into the Kings Bench And after the end of the same it is
Cognizee of lands extended by extent upon statute merchant but not delivered to him for that the Conusor dyed and the hâ—ir at the time of the inquisition taken was within age but now at full age if it do appeare to the Sheriff that the heire is of â—u â— age See the Statute for Merchants 13 E. 1. accord It was commanded the Sheriff whereas the Lady the Queen by her certain Writ out of the Court of the said Lady the Queen here at Westminster in the Terme of the Holy Trinity Anno Reg. c. 38. issuing and directed to the Sheriff of the County of Hereford reciting by the said Writ That whereas the sayd Lady the Queene had commanded the Sheriff of Middlesex by her said writ that the bodyes of E. W. of D. in the County c. and I.T. of W. in the same County c. if they were lay men found in his Bailâ—wick he should take should safely keep in the prison of the said Lord the King untill they had fully satisfied S. B. of W c. of fifty pounds which the same E. and I. the second day of Iuly Anno 23. Eliz. before R. N. and R. C. then Bayliffs of the City of W. and keepers of the greater peice of the seale of the statute Merchant there and W. I. Gent. then Clarke of the City aforesaid and keeper of the lesser part of the seale of Statute Merchant aforesaid Deputed to take acknowledgment of such Statutes for Debt for Merchants at the City aforesayd acknowledged themselves to owe to the said S. which they ought to have paid unto him at the Feast of Saint Michael the Arch Angell then next following and they have not payd the same unto him as it is said and in as much as the said Sheriff of Middlesex shall have executed the precept of the said Lady the Queen he should make appear to the Justices of the said Lady the Queen here in 8 Hillarii Anno 37 Reginae Nunc and the said sheriff of Middlesex to the Justices of the sayd Lady the Queene here at Westminster at that day returned that the same W and I. were Lay men and were not found in his Bailiwick and to the Sheriff of Hereford commanded that all the goods and chattells of the same E and I. and all the Lands and Tenements whereof the same E and I. at the day of the acknowledgement of the Debt aforesaid Recitall of the Writ of extent or at any time afterwards were seised to whose hands soever they should come unlesse to any heire within age by hereditary Descent they should descend he should deliver to the said S by reasonable price and extent To hold the goods and chattells aforesaid as his proper goods and chattells and the Lands and Tenements aforesaid as his free Tenement to him and his Assignes according to the form of the Statute therein made and provided untill the Debt aforesaid together with his reasonable and necessary Damages and costs as in Labours Suits Delayes and Expences he should levy thereof And neverthelesse That hee should take the bodyes of the sayd E. and I. and should safely keepe them in the prison of the sayd Lady the Queen untill they should satisfie the sayd S. of the Debt aforesayd in forme as aforesaid and in as much as that precept of the Lady the Queen should be executed he should make appear to the Iustices of the said Lady the Queen here at Westminster in Octob Sancti Michaelis Anno 38. abovesaid and that he should have then there the Writ aforesaid the same Sheriff of Hereford to the Iustices of the sayd Lady the Queen here at VVestminster The Sheriff returneth that the Conusors are dead Inquisition taken and the Lands extended but the Lands descended to an infant and the Sheriff by reason of his nonage could not deliver them to the Conusees at the said 8 S. Mich. returned that the same E. and I. were dead and also to the same Iustices of the sayd Lady the Queen here at that day returned a certain Inquisition before him the sayd sheriff of Hereford by vertue of a certain Writ to him therein directed at K. in the County of Hereford the thirteenth day of S. Anno 38. abovesaid by the oath of twelve honest and lawfull men of the County of Hereford was taken by which it was found that the same E. I. were dead after the acknowledgment of the Debt aforesaid and long before the taking of the said inquisition and that the same I the day whereon he dyed was seised in his Demesne as of Fee of and in four Closes or parcells of pasture lying and being in H within the parish of L. in the same County of Hereford containing by estimation fifteen acres c. as in the Inquisition And the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances were worth by the year in all issues besides Reprizes sixty shillings and that the same I.T. of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in forme aforesaid being seized after the acknowledgement of the Debt aforesaid and before the coming of the sayd Writ dyed thereof seised after whose Death The lands discend to the heir within age the Tenements aforesayd with the Appurtenances descended to one I.T. son and heir of the said I. T the son at the time of the taking of the Inquisition aforesaid was within the age of one and twenty yeares to wit of twenty yeares and no more so that the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances to the said S. by reason of the minority of the said I.T. the son he could not deliver according to the Tenor of the said writ to him therein directed and that the said E. at the time of the acknowledgement aforesaid made or at any time afterwards had no Lands or Tenements in the County of Hereford as by the Record and proceedings therein in the Court of the said Lady the Queen here plainly appeareth Suggestion that the heir is of full age And now in the Court of the said Lady the Queen before the Justices of the said Lady the Queen here at Westminster it is alledged that the said I.T. the son is come to his full age of one and twenty yeares and hath of a long time been of full age therefore the said Lady the Queene doth command the said Sheriff of Hereford that if it can appeare to the said Sheriff that the same I.T. came to his full age of one and twenty yeares before the issuing forth of this Writ and now to be then the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances by the Extent aforesaid in forme aforesaid made he should deliver to the said S. to hold as his free Tenement to him and his Assignes according to the forme of the Statute aforesaid thereof made and provided untill the Debt aforesaid Liberate conditionall that if it could appear to the sheriff that the heir is at full age together with reasonable and necessary Damages and Costs as
Judgment was given and in that case the Defen after Tryall and a speciall verdict given compounded with the plaintiff by the advise of I. P. Knight cheif Justice of England M 39. and 40. Eliz Rot. 110. ss Otherwise as it appeareth c. as in the Scire Facias and award the Alias Scire Facias Bar upon an Alias Sci fac upon a recognizance of priviledge where one makes default and the other pleads in bar payment of the condemnation at the perill of the Principall against him before the Teste of the first Scire facias Execution awarded against one of the Conuzers by default c. and now here at this day to wit at the said Tres Tri. came aswell the said I. by his Attorney aforesaid As the said S. by I E. his attorney And the said H. the fourth day of the Plea came not but made default And the sheriff as before now returneth that the said H. hath nothing nor is Found c. And hereupon the said I. prayeth execution against the said H. of the said 50 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged to him to be adjudged c. Therefore it is considered that the said I. have execution against the said H. for the said 50 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged by default c. And further the said I. prayeth execution against the said S. of the said 50 l by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged to him to be adjudged c. And the said I. prayeth license thereof to imparl here untill Oct. Mich. And hath it c the same day is given to the said I. here c and now here at this day to wit at the said Oct. S. Mich. came here aswell the same I. as the said S. by their attornies aforesaid And hereupon the same I. as before prayeth execution against the said S. of the said 50 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged to be adjudged him c ANd the said S. saith that the said I ought not to have execution a-against him for the said 50 l. in the Form aforesaid acknowledged Bar that the principall after the recovery and before the Teste of the Sci fac paid to the Conuzee the debt and damages recovered because he saith that the said E after the judgment aforesaid given And before the day of the purchasing of the said first Writ of Scire Facias to wit T. Die and An. paid to the said I the debt damages aforesaid by him against the said E in form aforesaid recovered according to the form and effect of the Recognizance aforesaid And this he is ready to verifie where upon he prayeth Judgment if the same I. ought to have execution against him for the said 50 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged c. Replication that the principall non solint and issue thereupon ANd the said I. saith that he by any thing before alleaged ought not to be repelled from having his execution aforesaid of the said 50 l. against the said S. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged because he saith that the said E. after the judgment aforesaid given and before the day of purchasing of the said first writ of Scire Facias hath not paid to the same I. the debt and damages aforesaid by the same I. against the said E. in Form aforesaid recovered according to the Form of the Recognizance aforesaid As the said S. hath above allowed and this he prayeth may bee inquired of by the Country And the said S. likewise Therefore 12. c. Entry of a Sci. fac against the Ter-tenants upon a judgment in debt after the death of the Obliger and the judgment by default Recitall of the recovery PAs 38. Eliz Rot. 1854. ss Otherwise as it appeareth in the Term of S. Hillary An. 38 Eliz. Reg. Rot. 511. It is thus contained Midd. ss It is commanded the sheriff whereas H. S. Esquire lately in the court of the Lady the Queen now to wit in the Term of St. Michael An. regni sui 30. and 31. before E A. Knight and his associates of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench here at Westminster by the consideration of the same Court had recovered against I. C late of London Esquire aswell a certaine debt of 19 l. as 7 l. which c. whereof he is convicted as by the record and proceedings in the court of the Queen here remaining manifestly appeareth Execution notwithstanding of the judgment aforesaid yet remayneth undon And the said I. C is dead and dyed seised of divers Lands and Tenements in his Demesne as of Fee as by the information of the said H. the Queen understandeth and because c. that by honest c. he should make known to the Tenants of the lands and Tenements which were of the said I. at the time of the judgment aforesaid given Suggestion of the death of the Defendant and averment that he died seised of divers lands c. Sci. fac to the Ter-tenants or at any time afterwards That they should be here at this day to wit in Oct. Pur. St. Mariae to shew if any thing c. wherefore the said H. ought to have execution against them of the debt and damages aforesaid of the lands and Tenements afore said according to the Form of the recovery aforesaid and now here at this day came the same H. by F B. his attorney and offered himself the 4th day against the said Tenants of the Lands and Tenements which were of the said I. at the time oft he judgment aforesaid given or at anytime afterwards in the plea aforesa d and they being solemnly called came not and the sheriff now retorneth that there are no lands nor Tenements in his Bayliwick which were of the said I. at the time of the judgment aforesaid given The Sheriff returneth quod milli sunt Tenements A Testat sci fac prayed Corn Testat sci fac awarded to the Ter-tennants in a foraign County or any time afterwards and here upon it is testified in the same court of the Queen here that there are divers lands and Tenements in the county of C. which were of the said I. at the time of the judgment aforesaid given and afterwards whereof he might make and levy the debt and damages aforesaid and prayeth a writ of the Lady the Queen to be directed to the sheriff of Cornwall to premonish the tenants of the lands and Tenements which were of the said I. in Oct. S. Mich. An. 30. and 31. abovesaid which day judgment was thereupon given or at any time afterwards in his Bayliwick that they be here 15. Pas to shew c. And now here at this day to wit the said 15 Pas came the same H. by his attorney aforesaid and offered himself the 4th day against the Tenants of the lands and Tenements which were of the said I. at the time of the judgment aforesaid given or at any time afterwards in the
plea aforesaid and they being solmnly called came not and the sheriff of Cornwell to wit C. T. Esquire now retorneth that he by vertue of the writ aforesaid to him directed such a day and yeare Tertenant returned of a Messuage and thirty acres of land by W. N. and H. F. honest c. made known to R. D. Tenant of one messuage and 30. acres of land with the appurtenances in T. C. now or late in the tenure of I. C and L M which were of I C in Fee simple at the time of the judgment given and afterwards that he should be here at this day to shew in Form aforesaid c. Therefore it is considered that the said Hugh have his execution against the said R. D. Tenant of the debt and damages aforesaid to be levied Judgment of the said Massuage and 30 acres of Land with the appurtenances Execution by default for the debt and damages aforesaid to be levied of the lands and tenements aforesaid Elegit of the moyety awarded of the lands for default of the said R. and hereupon the said H chose to be delivered to him the moyety of the said messuage and 30. acres of land with the appurtenances according to the Form of the Statute thereof made and provided until the debt and damages aforesaid be thereof levyed and prayeth a writ of the said Lady the Queen thereof to be directed to the said sheriff of the County of Cornwall and it is granted him retornable here tres Trin. And in as much c. Brownlow H 43. Eliz Rot. 157. Suff. ff Scire fac For Seaman against the Ter-tenants of T. L Re. in Cr. Trini 41. Eliz. upon a Recognizance for 60 l. 33 s. 4 d. for damages For P L retorned ter-tenant of divers lands c. saith that the said T L before the said judgment 10. of August 35. Eliz enfeoffed I. and T Brown to the use of the said Tho. and his heires males and that he was seised in Spec. Fee-tayle at the time of the judgment given and that he 11. Sept 41 dyed seised in taile And that the Lands descended to the said P as Son and heir and that he entred and was seised in Spec. Taile judgment if execution c the Plaintiff saith that T was seised in fee simple Entry of a Sci fac upon a bail to make deliverance after gage deliverance of Cattell in Court against the Manucaptors because the Conusor had not made deliverance 1 H 7 11. 21 E 3. Bâ— Pledges 9. 18. at the time of the judgment given and traverseth the Feoffment modo et forma HAs 33. Eliz. Rot. 2045. ss It is commanded the sheriff whereas G. G. of c R S. of c. in the Court of the Lady the Queen here to wit in the Term of St. Hillary An. c. 82 Before E.A. Knight c. of the bench here to wit at Westminster aforesaid had undertaken and both of them did undertake for S G that the same S should make deliverance return of 6. Cows to E C before the Feast of the Appostle P. I then next following under the penalty of both of them 40 l. which said 40 l. the same G S acknowledged and each of them acknowledgeth to be made of their Lands and Chattles and to belevied to the use of the said T. E. if the said S. G should not make deliverance of the Chattles aforesaid to the same T. according to the Form and effect of the recognizance aforesaid And the same S heitherto hath not made deliverance of the Chattles aforesaid to the said E. according to the Form of the recognizance aforesaid as by the information of the said T. the Queen understandeth And because c. that by honest c. he make knowne to the said G. and S. that they should be here at this day to wit tali di to shew if any thing c. to wit the said G. wherefore he the said 40 l by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged of his lands and chattles And the same S. wherefore the said 40 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged of his Lands and chattles and either of them ought not to be made and rendred to the same T. according to the form of the recognizance aforesaid if c. At which day here came aswell the same T. by F. E. his attorny as the same G. and S. in their proper persons and hereupon the same T. prayeth execution against the same G. of the said 40 l. by him in Forme aforsaid acknowledged c. and against the said S. for the said 40 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged Test Nichil dic to be adjudged by him c. And the said G. and S. reserving to themselvs all and all manner c. Pet. tit entry of a Nihil dic hereupon Mich 34. Eli. Rot. 1813. Entry of a Sci fac upon a recognizance taken to make deliverance upon a gage deliverance against Manucapt because the Conusor had not made deliverance ss HIll 18. Eliz. Rot. 405. ss It is commanded the sheriff whereas H. N. late c. and G. H. of c. lately in the Court of the Queen here to wit in Trinity term An. 17. c. before I. D. Knight and his associates Justices of the Lady the Queen here of the common Bench and undertook for W. C. that the said W. should make deliverance and retorn of ten Oxon or of the value of them to T. H. upon the tenth day of June then next following within the Church yard of the parish Church of S. in the county of S. under the penalty of 200 l. which said 200 l. the said H. and G. acknowledged to be made of their lands and Chattles and to be Levied to the use of the same T. and D. the said W. made not deliverance of the Cattle aforesaid nor of the value of them according to the Form of the racognizance aforesaid as by the information of the said T and D the Qu. understandeth T 9 Jac rot 3 510. and because c. that by honest c. he make knowne to the said H. and G. that they should be here at this day to wit in Oct. S. Hill to shew if c. wherefore the same T. and D. ought not to have execution against them of the said 200 l. according to the Form of the recognizance aforesaid Sci. fac in a writ De droit de gard Sci facâ— upon judgment in debt and detinue if c. And now here at this day came aswell the said T. D by their attornies aforesaid as the same H and G. by F. their attorney And the sheriff now retorneth that they have nothing c. nor are found c And hereupon the said T. and D. pray execution against the same H. and G. of the said 200 l. to be adjudged them c. H 10. H. 6. Rot. 141. Scire Fac Upon a
of the Dower of the said M. of one Messuage 29. acres of land c. with the appurtenances in M. from the time of the death of the said R her late husband c. As for their damages which they had by occasion of the detayning of the Dower whereof he is convicted as by the Record proceedings therein in the Court of the Queen here remayning manifestly appeareth Tenant in the writ of dower after judgment dieth Sci fac awarded against the son and heir Neverthelesse excution of the judgement aforesaid yet resteth und on And the same T. B. is dead as by the information of the said W. and M. the Queen understands and because c. that by honest c. he should make knowne to E. B. son and heir of the said T. who holdeth the lands and tenements which were of the said T. at the time of the judgment aforesaid given that he should be here at this day to wit in Cr. Anim. to shew if any thing c. wherefore the said W. and M ought not to have execution against him of the value of the Damages aforesaid of the Lands and Tenements aforesaid according to the Form of the recovery aforesaid if c. Return de vic Alias Scâ— fac awarded And now here at this day came the same W. and M. by I. G. their attorney and offered themselves the 4th dâ—y against the said E. of the plea aforesaid And he being solemnly called came not and the sheriff now retorneth that he hath nothing c. nor is found c. Therfore as before the sheriff is commanded that by honest c. he should make knowne to the said E. that he be here 15. Marti to shew in Form aforesaid if c. And now here at this day to wit the said 15. Marti came aswell the same W. and M. by their attorney aforesaid as the same E. premonished c. by W. D. his Attorney Sci fac returned but note that the Sheriff doth not return of what lands the son and heiâ— is tenant according to the point in the writ And the sheriff to wit R. I. Esquire now retorneth that he made knowne to the said E. of being here at this day to shew in Form aforesaid by T. D. and I. G. honest c. And hereupon the said W. M. prayeth Execution against the said E. of the value and damages aforesaid of the lands and tenements aforesaid to them to be adjudged c. and the said E. reserving to himself all and all manner of exceptions and advantages aswell to the said writ of Scire fac as to the declaration aforesaid prayeth imparlance here untill Oct. S. Hill and hath it c. Speciall imparlance The same day is given to the said W. and M here c. At which day c. and from thence imparleth untill Oct. Mich And now here at this day to wit at the said Oct. Mich. came aswell the said W. M as the said E. by their Attornies aforesaid and hereupon the said W. and M as before prayeth execution against the said E. of the value and Damages aforesaid to them to be adjudged c. And the said E saith nothing in bar or hinderance of the execution of the said W. and M aforesaid by which the same W. and M. remaine against the said E. and thereof without defence therefore it is considered that the said W. and M. have Execution against the said E. of the value and Damages aforesaid of the lands and Tenements aforesaid by default c. And because it is not knowne what Lands and Tenements the same T had at the day of his death in Fee-simple Judgment by nichil dic Suggestion to have a Writ to inquire of the value of the lands awarded nor how much those Lands and Tenements were worth by the yeare according to the true value thereof it is commanded the sheriff that by the oath of honest and Lawfull men of his Bayliwick he diligently inquire what Lands and Tenements the said T. had the day of his death in the Bayliwick of the said sheriff And if the said T. died seised of any Lands and Tenements with the appurtenances in Fee-simple Then how much those Tenements were worth by the yeare in all issues beyond reprises Quaere for these words are neither perfect nor good And after such inquisition by the sheriff made he deliver the same Lands and tenements to the same W. and M without delay according to the true value of them to hold to the same W. and M. untill the said 45 l. and 10 s for the value and damages aforesaid thereof be levyed c. and in asmuch c. the sheriff make appeare here 15. Mich. At which day there came the said W. and M by their attorney aforesaid and the sheriff to wit Quaere de rest matter I. B. Knight now retorneth here a certaine Inquisition c. that the father was seised in Fee of 22. acres of Land at the day of his death to the value of 9 s. 8 d. which said 22 acres of Land the sheriff delivers intirely c. Debt against fâ—ur Executors two appear and the Plaint tame against the same two with a simul cum c. Judgment against the four and the two that appeared onely a mercied H 12. H. 7. rot 361 Mordant Devon ss Roger Viell brought his Accompt of debt against Nich. Yeo. and Eliz. his wife executors of Eliz. Mounck executrix of I. Mounck that they together with W. Mo. and H. Mounck should render to him 38 l. 17 s. upon bill obligatory made for the payment of 64 l. 19 s. 7 d. ob and satisfaction confessed for 26 l 2 s. 7 d. ob by the testator Notwithstanding the executors although often requested c. have not rendred c. And the same N. and Eliz his wife together with those c. to him to render gain say and unjustly detaine c. and the same Nicholas and Ann confesse the account and judgment that the plaintiffe should recover against the said Nicholas and Elizabeth W. and Humphery the debt and damages to 10 s. de bonis testatoris levand and the said Micholas and Eliz. in mercy c. and the damages remitted A Sci. fac was brought against the Executors upon this judgment as followeth H 13. H. 7. Rot. 309. Mordant Devon ss R. U. brought his scire fac upon the judgment next above against the said executors to have execution upon the said judgment retorned Cr. Trin. the sheriff retorneth Scire Feci to Humphery Mounck one of the executors who commeth Sci fac upon the judgment abovesaid c. And nothing against the other two Executors which came not and the said Humphery pleaded ne unq Execut. The Plaintiff saith that he ought not to be barred from having his execution aforesaid upon the judgment aforesaid and notwithstanding the said plea of the said Humphery above
untill the debt aforesaid be levied and upon a judgment that the first recorder is satiâ—fied he shall have such a Scire fac against the first creditor to remove him and to have the lands delivered upon the second extent 38 E. 3. 12. 6. whereas it was considered that in the Court of the Lord the King here that Edward B. Knight should have execution against Thomas Coney late of c. otherwise called c. aswell of a certaine debt of 80 l. which the same Ed. otherwise in the Court of the Lady Elizabeth late Queen of England here to wit in Mich. Term An. of the Reigne of the said Lady the Queen 39. and 40 had recovered against him as of 50 s which to the same Ed. in the same Court were adjudged for his damages which he had by occasion of the detayning of that debt whereof he is convicted And the same Edward afterwards came into the Court of the Lord the King now here and by the statute in such case provided chose to be delivered to him all the goods and chattles of the said T. besides his Oxen other necessaries for the plough likewise the moyety of all his lands and Tenements in the County of Staff to hold as his Free Tenements to him and his assignes according to the statute aforesaid untill he had levyed the debt and Damages thereupon whereupon the King by his writ commanded the sheriff of Staff that all the goods and chattles of the same T. besides his Oxen and necessaries of his Plough and likewise all his lands and Tenements in the County of Staff whereof the same T. in Cr. Anim. An. of the Reigne of the late Queen 39. or at any times afterwards was seised or possessed without delay he should cause to be delivered to the said Edward by a resonable price and extent to hold to him the goods and Chattles aforesaid as his proper goods and Chattles And also to hold the moyety aforesaid as his Free Tenement to him his assignes according to the Form of the statute aforesaid untill he had levied the debt Damages aforesaid thereupon and in asmuch c. the sheriff should make to appeare here in Crast Anim. An. Regni Rs. nunc 9 and the same sheriff here then returned that he by vertue of the writ aforesaid to him directed had take a certain Inquisition before him at Stafford in the same County of Staff the 22. day of October last past by the Oath of 12. c. by which it was found that the same T. after the Judgment in the same Writ specified given to wit the 20 day of November before the taking of the inquisition aforesaid was seised in his Demesne of Fee of and in the Mannor of W. Coney with its Rights members and appurtenances in the said County of Saff of the yearly rent in all issues besides reprizes 40 s. and recite the return of the inquisition word for word untill in all issues besides reprizes 20 s. And further by the Inquisition aforesaid it is found that the same T. C. at the time of giving of the judgment in the Writ aforesaid specified or at any time afterwards untill the same day of taking of the inquisition aforesaid had no other or more land or Tenements nor any goods or Chattels in the same County of Stafford to the knowledge of the Jury of the Inquisition aforesaid further the same sheriff then there returned that he by vertue of the Writ aforesaid the moyety of the Mannor and Tenements aforesaid above mentioned to be extended to the same Edw. B. according to the exegency of that writ he could not cause to be delivered for that the Mannor aforesaid and all other the premisses with the appurtenances by vertue of an other writ of Extent and Liberi fac to him before therein directed the eight day of January last past to one H P. made to be delivered All and singular which premisses with the appurtenance in the hands of the same H. yet are and remaine by occasion thereof And as to any further execution of the said writ nothing by the said sheriff was further acted therein As by the Record thereof in the Court here remayning manifestly appeareth although after the taking of the Inquisition aforesaid the 8. day of November An Regni of the said Lord the King now of England the 9 th abovesaid it is satisfied to the said Humphery by the said T. Coney of his debt and Damages in the said other Writ specified And although also the said Edward be not yet satisfied of his Debt and Damages aforesaid Notwithstanding the same Humphery yet keepeth possession of the lands and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances Generall avermant of satisfâ—ction as by the information of the said Edward the King understandeth And the same Lord the King being willing to do to the said Edw what is just and consonant to reason doth command the sheriff that by honest c. he should make knowne to the said Humphery that he should be here at this day to wit Cr. S. Trin to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same Humphery whereas he is satisfied of the Debt and Damages aforesaid in Form as aforesaid The possession of the Mannor Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances he would hold or ought and row here at this day came aswell the said Edward by Iohn Richards his attorney as the same Humphery by R. G. his attorney and hereupon the same E. prayeth judgment and that the same H. from his possession of the Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances may be removed And that the said Edward into the possession of the moyety of the same Mannor and Tenements with the appurtenances may be restored so that the moyety of the same to the said Edward according to the extent aforesaid may be delivered c. ANd the said Humphery reserving to himself all and every advantatages and exceptions Speciall imparlance aswell to the Writ as to the declaration a-aforesaid prayeth license thereof to imparll untill Oct. S. Mich. and hath it c. the same day is given to the said Edward B. here c. At which day here came aswell the said Edward as the said Humphery by their attornies aforesaid And hereupon the same Edw as before prayeth judgment and that the said H. from his possession of the mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances may be removed and that the moyety of the same Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to the said Edward according to the Extent aforesaid may be delivered c. And the same Humphery nothing in Bar or delay of the judgment aforesaid saith whereby the same Edward remayneth against the same H. therein without defence Therefore it is considered that the same Humphery from the possession of the mannor Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances be removed c. And that the moyety of the same Mannor and Tenements
which day the Defendant pleads no award made generally The plaintiff pleads an award and sets forth a breach Causes of demuâ—rer that the Defendant at Midsomer 1621. did not pay 14 l. of an Annuall summe of 14 l. by the award yearely to be paid the Defendant demurs for two causes 1. for that the plaintiff hath not set forth any sufficient breach of the award 2 for that the award for payment of the said 14 l is void Joinder in Demurrer Entry of a writ of Testat Sci fac against Ter tenants who appear upon the Sheriffs return and say that there is another Tertenant in an other County non praenuncit and pray that they may not answer to the wâ—it of Sci fac brought against them usque alius pâ—aemuniatur T 20. Jac. R. Rot. 3047. Brownlow Otherwise as it appeareth Mich. 19. Jac. Rot. 939. It is thus contayned otherwise as it appeareth M. 19. Rot. 1637. It is contayned thus London ss It was commanded the sheriffs whereas V. Norrington latly in the Court of the Lady Elizabeth late Queen of England to wit in Mich. Term An Regni sui 35 and 36. before Edmond Anderson Knight and his associates then Justices of the Lady the Queen of the Common Bench at the Towne of S. Alb. in the County of Hertf. by the consideration of the same Court had recovered against Far Earl of D. otherwise called F. Ear. of D. aswell a certain Debt of 300 l. as 50 s. which of the same Vin in the same Court of the late Qu. of the Common Bench were adjudged for his Damages which he had by occasion of the detayning of that Debt whereof he is convicted as by the Record and proceedings therein in the same Court of the Lord the King here to wit at Westminster remayning manifestly appeareth Execution notwithstanding of the judgment aforesaid yet remayneth undon And aswell the said Earl as the said Vincent are dead As by the information of I. A. and Sarah his wife administratrix of the â—â—â—ds and Chattells which were of the said Vincent by Joan Norrington â—â—te Executrix of the Testament of the said Vincent not administred the King understandeth and because c. that by honest c. They should make knowne to the Tenants of the lands and Tenements which were of the said Earl of Derb. An. of the late Queene 35. which day the judgment aforesaid was given or at any time afterwards that they should be here at this day to wit tres Trin. to shew if any thing c. wherefore the Debt and Damages aforesaid ought not to be made of those lands and Tenements and rendred to the same Iohn and Sarah according to the Form of the recovery aforesaid if c. And now here at this day came the same Iohn and Sarah by Thomas Cony their attorney and offered themselves the 4. day against the said Tenants in the plea aforesaid And they being solemnly called came not and the sheriff to wit R D. and E. A. now tetorne that there are not any Tenants nor any Tenant of any lands or Tenements which were of the said Earle at the same time of the judgment aforesaid given Testat Sci fac or any time afterwards in their bayliwick to whom or to which they could make known And hereupon it is testified in the same Court of the said lord the King here that there are divers Tenants of lands and Tenements which were of the said Earle at the time of the judgment aforesaid given and afterwards in the County of North. to whom he may make knowne Therefore it is commanded the sheriff of North. that by honest c. that hee make known to the Tenants of the lands and Tenements which were of the said Earle at the time of the judgment aforesaid given or at any time afterwards in his bayliwick that they be here in 8. S. Mich. to shew in Form aforesaid if c. At which day here came aswell the said I. Awberry and Sarah by their attorney aforesaid as Iohn Earle of Bridgwater and Francis his wife premonished c. by William Cragg their attorney and the sheriff of the said County of North. to wit Lodowich Pemberton Knight now retorneth that he by vertue of the Writ aforesaid to him directed by William Smith and Thomas Allen honest c. made knowne to the said Iohn Earle of Bridgwater and Francis Tenants of 2. Messu 1. Cottage 100. acres of land 20. acres of Meadow and 100. acres of pasture called Swillington lands with the appurtenances in Brackley in the same County of North. Tertenants of divers lands returned of the lands and Tenements which were of the said Fardinand Earle of Darb. of which the said Earle was seised in the Cr. Anim. An. 30 abovesaid of being here at the same Oct. S. Mich. to shew in Forme aforesaid c. And that there are no other or more Tenants of any lands or Tenements which were of the said Earle at the said Cr. Anim. or any time afterwards in his bayliwick to whom he can make knowne And hereupon the same Iohn Awbery and Sarah say that the administration of all the goods and Chattels which were of the said Vincent at the time of his death by the same Joane Norrington not administred by George Arch-Bishop of Canterbury of all England Primate and Metropolitan the 12. day of November An Rs. nunc 12. at London in the parish of S. Mary Bow in the Ward of Cheap after the death of the same Joane to the said Sa. were committed And they bring here in the Court lit Administrator of the said Arch Bpp which the commission of the Administration aforesaid in Form aforesaid testifies c. pray execution against the said Earle of Bridgwater and Francis of the Debt and Damages aforesaid of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in Forme aforesaid to them to be adjudged c. And the Earle of Bridgwater and Francis pray licence therein to imparle here untill 8. S. Hill And have it c. the same day is given to the same Iohn Awbery and Sarah here c which imparlance is continued untill Cr. Tri. 20. Jac. At which day the Defendant pleads as followeth And the same Earle of Bridgwater and Francis say that the same I. A. and Sarah ought not to have execution against them for the debt and Damages aforesaid because they say that the day of purchasing of the said Writ of Scire facias prosecuted against the same Earle and Francis to wit the first day of Iune An. Rs. c 19. one Christopher Earle Esquire was and yet is Tenant as of Fee Tenant of the mannor of S. M. with the appurtenances in S. M. in the county of Dor. and of 20. Messuages 20. Gardens 20. M. 11 Edw. 3. Fitz. brev 266. such plea is adjuâ—ged good Orchards c. with the appurtenances in S. M. aforesaid whereof the same Fardinand late Earle of Darb. in the
said morrow after all Soules An. 35. of the said late Queen abovesaid which day the judgment aforesaid was given was seised in his Demesne as of Fee And that no writ of Scire facias issued out of the Court here directed to the sheriff of Dor. to premonish the same Tenant of the Mannor and Tenements aforesaid of being here so that execution of the judgement aforesaid may be don upon him if it can and this they are ready to verifie whereupon they pray judgment and a Writ of Scire Fac. against the Tenant of the Mannor and the Tenements aforesaid in the same County of Do. at the prosecution of the said I. Awbery and Sarah to be directed to the same sheriff of Dor. to issue out of the court here to premonish the same Tenant of the mannor and Tenements aforesaid which were of the late Earle of Darb. of being here to answer of and upon the premisses The same Earle of Bridgwater and Francis pray that a Writ of Scire Fac. may issue out of the Court here to premonish the same Tenant of the Mannor and Tenemants aforesaid in the County of Do. being here c. To shew in Form aforesaid c. ANd the same Iohn and Sarah that they by any thing before alleadged from having their execution aforesaid against the said Earle of B. and F. for the Debt and Damages aforesaid of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof the same Earle and Francis are above retorned Tenants Replication and Travers without that that the Debtor was seised in fee of those lands at the time of the judgment ought not to be hindred because they say that long before the judgment aforesaid given in Form as aforesaid the said Edward late Earle of Derb. was seised of the said mannor of Sturmister Marshalls and Tenements in Fee and being so thereof seised and afterwards and before the judgment aforesaid to wit 12. Aprill An. 3. and 4. Ph. and Mary of the same mannor and Tenements infeoffed W. M. and I. E in Fee to the uses of H. S. Seignior Strange and Margaret for their Lives and the life of every of them and after their deaths to the use of the heires of the said H. of the body of the said M. begotten or to be begotten and for default of such heires males to the use of Edward Earle of Derb. and the heires of his body lawfully begotten and for default of such issue to those of the right heires of the said Edward Earle of Derb. a tout jours and shew that the said Henry and Margaret had issue the aforesaid Fardinand Earle of Darbey and died seised c. by which the said Fardinand entred and was seised in speciall Taile to wit c. And being so thereof seised the judgment aforesaid upon the said writ of Scire facias above specified was had against the same Fardinand then seised of the said Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in his demesnes of Fee to wit to him and his heires males of his body lawfully proceeding And the same Fardinand being so thereof seised the same Fardinand after the judgment aforesaid given at Brackly aforesaid died of such his estate thereof seised without heire Male of his body lawfully proceeding without this that the said Fardinand late Earle of Derb. at the same Cr. Anim. An. 35. abovesaid was seised of the said Mannor of S. M. to the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in S. M. in his demesnes of Fee as the same Earle of Bridgwater and Francis have before alleadged Travers and this they are ready to veryfie whereupon they pray judgment and their execution aforesaid against the same Earle of Bridgwater and Fr. of the Debt and Damages aforesaid of the tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof the same Earle and Francis are above returned Tenants to them to be adjudged c. issue upon the Travers Issue upon the Travers and a ven fac awarded to the sheriff of Do. of the neighbourhood of Sturnister Marshall quaere if it ought not to have beene of the Mannor c. P 20. J. Rot. 2075. Buk ss Whereas Samuel Cowper and Iohn Sanders executors of the Testament of Antony Cowper Gent Entry of a Sci. Fac. against â—eâ—tâ—enants of lands c. tempore judiciireddit And divers tenants of divers lands a e retorned who came not and a writ of Elegit is awarded of the moyety of the lands whereof they were retorned tenants H 39. Eliz. rot 2336. lately in the Court of the Lord the King now to wit in Trinity Term An. 19. before Henry Horbert Knight and Baronet and his associates then Justices of the said Lord the King of the common Bench here to wit at We. by the consideration of the same Court had recovered against Ric. Gosnold late c. otherwise called R. G. of c aswell a certaine Debt of 40 l. as 60 l. which to the same S. and I. in the same Court of the King here were adjudged for their Damages which they had c. whereof he is convicted As by the Record c Execution neverthelesse c. And the same Richard is dead as by the information of the said Samuel and Iohn the King understandeth and because c. that by honest c. he should make knowne to the Tenants of the lands and Tenements in your Bayliwick whereof the same Richard was seised in his demesne as of Fee in Cr. S. Trin. last past on which day judgment aforesaid was given or at any time afterwards that they should be here at this day to wit Quinq Pas to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same Samuel and Io. Execution against them for the Debt and Damages aforesaid of the Lands and Tenements aforesaid ought not to have according to the Form of the recovery aforesaid if c. And now here at this day came the same S and I. by Iohn Andrews their attorney and offered themselves the fourth day against the Tenants of the Lands and Tenements which were of the said Richard at the time of the judgment aforesaid given or at any time afterwards in the same plea Scire fac to severall ter-tenants of divers lands and tenements 2. of whom make default And they being solemnly called came not and the sheriff to wit Iohn Denham Knight now retorneth that by G. B. and G. G. honest c. he make knowne to Eliz. G. widow Tenant of one capitall Messuage c. in Becconfeild aforesaid c. and also to one R. G. Gent. an other Tenant of one capitall Messuage or Farm c. And to Susanu G. and T. G. Tenants of one Messuage c. and to Thomas G. Gent. Tenant of one Messuage or Inn c. And also to one Ia. Necton Esq Tenant of one Messuage c. which were of the said Rich. Goswold in Fee-simple at the time of the judgment given and afterwards And hereupon the same Sam. and Io.
2048. Brownlow Continuance of the Extent where the writ is awarded in one County At which day here cometh the Conusee by his Attorney aforesaid and the said Sheriff hath done nothing therein nor sent the Writ thereof therefore as before let another Writ be thereof made to the same sheriff in form aforesaid returnable â—ere in Octab. S. Michaelis c. T. 5 Eliz. rot 373. Monmouth ss A Capias ad satisfaciend awarded after the Sheâ—iff had returned upon an Elegit that the Dâ—fendant had no goods noâ— lands At which day here came the said W. by his Attorney aforesaid and the Sheriff of the said County of Middlesex now returneth that the said C hath no goods nor chattells in his Bailiwick which he could deliver to the said W. and that the sayd C at the said 15. Novem. Pas nor at any time afterwards had any lands or tenements in his Bayliwick whereof he could deliver a moiety to the said W as by the said Writ to him it was commanded and hereupon the said W prayeth a Writ of the sayd Lady the Queen of taking the said C to be directed to the Sheriffs of London where the Originall Writ first issued and it is granted to him c. Therefore it is commanded to the Sheriffs of London that they take the said C if c. and him safely keep so that they might have his body here in Cr. S. Martini to satisfie the said W of the debt and pamages aforesaid and see the Roll 381. see 17 E 4 fol. 4 After the return of a Nichil upon an Elegit after judgment in a Scire facias the Defendant prayeth a Capias ad satisfaciendum and hath it and with this case Hobart and Winch agree as at large appeareth in Foster and Jacksons case in Mich 12 Iac. but Warburton and Nicholls were of a contrary opinion 34 H 6 f. 20 a. with this opinion Littleton agreeth Entry of a case in the proper County and Non inventus returned and a Testat ca. sat awarded into a forraigne County M 19 Iac. rot 510. Brownlow Norfolk ss The Sheriff was commanded that he should take H P late of London scrivener if c. and safe c. so that he should have his body here a die S. M in und mensem to satisfie I C of twenty seven pounds and foure shillings which to the same John were adjudged for his Damages which he sustained by occasion of not performing of certain premisses and assumptions to the same John by the said Henry at London in the County aforesaid done whereof he is convicted and now here at this day cometh the said Iohn by E H his Attorney and the Sheriff now returneth that he is not found c. And hereupon it is testified in the same Court of the King here on the behalfe of the said Iohn London that the said Henry doth lye hid and run from place to place in London Therefore the Sheriffs of London are commanded that they take the same Henry if c. and safely c. so that they may have his body here in Octab S. Martini to satisfie to the said Iohn of his damages aforesaid in form aforesaid c. Entry of a Capias ad satisfaciend M 2. and 3. Eliz Dyer fol 193. pl. 29. Cepi corpus returned M 2 and 3 Eliz. rot 1239 Lennard Middlesex ss It was commanded the sheriff that he should take Francis Kemp Gent. if c. safely c. so that he should have his body here at this day to wit in Cr S. Martini to satisfie Christopher Rich Gent one of the Attorneyes c. according to the Liberties and priviledges c. of one hundred and four pounds which to the same C in the same Court here were adjudged for his damages which he sustained by occasion of a cereaine trespasse to the same C by the same F with force and armes and contrary to the peace of the said Lady the Queene now at C in the County aforesaid done whereupon it is considered c. And now here at this day came the said C in his proper person and the Sheriff to wit T R and C D now return that he before the coming of the sayd Writ took the body of the said F K by virtue of another Writ of the Lady the Queen of capiend in a plea of trespasse against the same Francis at the suit of the said Creturnable here Die Sabbati next after Tres Michaelis last past and after the coming of the said first Writ and before the return of the same the same sheriff also took the body of the same Francis by virtue of this writ the body notwithstanding of the same Francis at the same day of Saturday in the same former Writ specified before the Justices here at Westminster caused to be brought as the same first Writ in it selfe doth exact and require whereupon the same now F present here in Court is committed to the prison of the Lady the Queen of the Fleet there to continue c. Afterwards to wit the twentieth day of November that same Terme came here into the Court the same Francis in his proper person by the Warden of the prison of the Fleet brought here to the barr and delivered to the Justices here a Writ of the Lady the Queen closed to them directed in these words Elizabeth c. A Writ of mainprise out of Chancery directed to the Justices to baile the Defendant being in Execution and to prosecute an attaint upon that whereupon he is in execution To her faithfull and beloved Iames Dyer Knight and his associates our Justices of the Bench greeting Whereas F. K. hath arrayed before you by our Writ a certain jury of twenty four Knights to make a jury by whom a certain Inquisition was late taken before you at Westminster by our Writ between Christopher Rich Gent. one of the Attorneyes c. in the same Bench the same Francis in a certain Trespasse to the same Christopher by the same Francis done as it is sayd on the part of the same F. we have received That he by pretence of the process in the said plea of Trespasse made is taken and detained in our prison of the Fleet insomuch as he cannot prosecute the sayd Jury Whereupon hee supplicated us to exhibit to him a fit remedy we willing that the same Francis may be so detained in our Prison as that he may and ought to prosecute the Jury we command you that if the same Francis shall find to you sufficient maintainers who shall undertake to have him before you to prosecute against him or that he should not prosecute that Attaint aforesaid and the Attaint determined if it should passe against him or that he should not prosecute that Attaint that hee should render himselfe to our prison aforesaid and to satisfie as well in that which to us to the same Christopher in that which belongeth to him in
upon statute Merchant and upon return nulla bona mobilia And that he is beneficed at D. and awarding of an Extent c. See the Register of Writs fol. 148. An action 147. C. B. F. N B. fol. 131. A. M. 39. H. 6. rot 134. fi fa. de bonis eccliastices H 45. Eliz. Rot. Rot. 1211. Brownlow C. Ebor. ss The Sheriffs were commanded that 400 l. of the movable goods and Chattles of Richard Baitson of B. in the county of York Clerk in the Bailywick without delay they levy and cause to be had to Eliz. M. of the City of York merchant which the same Richard the 9th July Ao. R. nunc 44. before T. M. Mayor of the City of York and Thomas Royston then clerk deputed to take Recognizance of debts according to the form of the statute merchant within the same city acknowledged himselfe to owe to the same E. which he ought to have paid to him at the Feast of St. Michael then next coming and the same to him hath not yet paid c. And in as much c. They should make known here at this day to wit in October Pur. S. Mariae c. And now here at the day came the same Eliz. by James Bryâ— his attorny here into the court the Recognizance aforesaid which the debt aforesaid in Form aforesaid testifieth And the Sheriff now retorneth that the same Richard hath no movable goods or chattles in their Bailywick wherof they could levy the debt aforesaid or any parcel thereof And that the same Rich. is a clerk and benificed within the Dioces of York to wit at B. aforesaid And that he hath no lay Fee within their Bailywick and hereupon the same Eliz. praveth a writ of the Lady the Queen by the statute c. to the Reverent Father in Christ to Mathew Arch-Bishop of York Primate and Metropolitan of England to be directed and it is granted to him c. And in asmuch c. the same Archb. should make knowne here 15. Trin. the same day is given to the same Eliz. here c. Distringas Distress against the Lord of a mannor in aneient demesnes to hold his court c. Mich. 1. Mariae Rot. 123. entry of a writ of distresse against the Lord of a Mannor of ancient demesnes to hold his court so that the Sheriff recordari fac Loq in a writ of false iudgment upon a writ de recto clause T 3. Ca. Rot. 1887. Pytt Philizer London ss Entrey of a distringas against the Sheriff for returning of Pettit issues the plaintiff prayeth a Test Distringas to a forreigne county that the defendant may be distrained by greater issues omnia issues 10 l. It was commanded the Sheriffs as more times the King had commanded the same Sheriffs that they should destrain the Mayor Cominalty citizens of the city of London otherwise called M C. and C. of the city of London by all their lands c. and that of the issues c. And that they should have their bodys here at this day to witt in Cr. Trin. to answer D. B. widow R. B. Esquire and T. B. gent. executors of the testament of Tho. Bennet otherwise called T. B. the younger citizen and Alderman of London of a plea that they render unto to them 1500 l. which from them they uniustly detaine c. And now here at this day come the same D.R. and T. Bennet by Richard Williams their attorney and offered themselves the 4. day against the said Mayor and Cominalty citizens of the city of London in the plea aforesaid and they came not the sheriffs to wit R. F. and E. Brumfeyld now retorn that the same M. and C. and citizens of London are distrained by their chattles to the value of 40 l. and bayled by I. G. and R. R. Therefore they in mercy and because it is testified in the same court of the Lord the King here on the behalfe of the same executors that the said Mayor and C. and. citizens of London have divers lands and chattles in the county of Surrey Testat distringas awarded to the Sheriff of Surry whereof they may be distrained for better issues of their lands and chattles so that the Lord the King now may be answered of better issues of the lands chattles of the same Mayor Cominalty and citizens of the city of London if the same Mayor and C. C. of the city of London in the same court here will not soone appeare to answer the same D. R. and T. Bennet in the plea aforesaid Therefore it is commanded to the sheriff of Surrey that he destrain the same Mayor and Cominality citizens of the city of London by all their lands c. And that for the issues See the old Book of entries fol. 226. title distresses pl. 4. accord Surry c. so that he may have their bodies here tres Mich. to answer the said Dorothey Rich. and Tho. Bennet in the plea aforesaid c. And it is to be knowne that a writ thereof the Justices here have delivered to Theophi Tipton undersheriff of Surrey present in Court here that same Tearm to execute in Forme of Law c. Elegit M 19. Ja Rot. 1949. Entrey of a writ of Elegit in the same term wherein it was returned not upon the indictment Roll nor upon the Roll of the writ of Scire facias the custom it But note that the writ of Elegit is demanded and adjudged to the enter upon Roll of the entrey of the Scire fac The like form of entrey of Elegit P 10. H. 4. Rot. 140. It was commanded to the sheriff of Derb. whereas lately in the court of the Lord the King now here to wit at Westminster it had been considered that P. Moyl should have execution against Robert Turner Gent. one of the attornies of the Court of the common Bench of the Lord the King here aswell of a certaine debt of 40 l. which the same Prudence in the court of the Lord the King here had recovered against him as of c. which to the same P. in the same court of the King here were adjudged for her damages which she had by occasion of the detayning of that debt whereof he is convicted The same Prudence afterwards came into the same court of the Lord the King here and by the statute therein provided chose to be delivered to her all the goods and Chattles of the same Rob. besids his Oxen and necessaries of his Plough H. 12 Eliz. rot 1470. s. Fylmer T. against L. entry of a Writ of Partition by prec fuit vic P. 12 Eliz Rot 1016. the like upon an extent T. 20. Jac. Rot 2080. B. against M. H. 19 Jac. Rot 3192. S. g. J.T. 1. Caâ— Regis rot 569. M. against C. and likewise the moyety of all his lands and Tenements in your Bayliwick to hold to her the goods and chattles aforesaid as her
proper goods and chattles And also to hold the moyety of the lands and Tenements aforesaid as her free Tenements to her and her assignes according to the forme of the statute aforesaid untill he had levyed the debt and damages aforesaid thereof of all which goods and chattles besids the Oxen and necessaries of his Plough And likewise the moyety of all the lands and Tenements of the said Rob. in your bayliwick whereof the same Rob. the 6. day of November An. c. 17. which day iudgment there in was given or at any time afterwards was seised without delay he should deliver by a resonable price and extent to hold to her the goods and chattles aforesaid as her proper goods and chattles and also to hold the moyety aforesaid as her freehold to her and her assignes according to the Forme of the statute aforesaid untill the debt and damages aforesaid were levied thereof And in asmuch as he had executed that command he should make appeare The Sheriff returneth that the Defendant such a day was possessed of divers goods to the value of 6 l. which he delivered to the Plaintiff at the same value in part of satisfaction of the debt and damages Note that in an Elegit the goods ought to be appraised by the Jurors and to be returned by the Inquisition with the Lands c. 1 Mar Dyer f. 100. Pl. 71. accord And further the Sheriff returneth an Inquisition wherein it was found that the Defendant at the day of taking of such Inquisition was seised of divers lands in fee to the value of 22 l. by the year besides reprises the moyety whereof he delivered to the Plaintiff to hold according to the Statute untill he had levied the residue of the said debt and damages there to wit at Westminster aforesaid upon the Thursday next after the morrow of St. Martin And that he should have then here that writ c. And now here at this day to wit the same Thursday next after the same morrow of S. Martin came the same Prudence by T. T. her attorny and the sheriff of the same county of Derb. to wit Iohn Milward Esq now here retorneth a certaine Inquisition before him at Chesterfeild in the said county of Derb. the 6. day of Octob. last by the oath of 12. c. taken whereby it is found that the same Ro. Turner was possessed of 2. Cowes one Mare price 6l as of his proper cattle chattles the same day of the taking of that Inquisition was seised in his demesne as of Fee of and in one Messuage or tenement with the appurtenances in H. in the county aforesaid wherein the same Rob. then lived And of and in one close of arrable land there whereupon the messuage aforesaid standeth one other close called G. S. one other close called M. S. c. as in the inquisition Value of the land found besides the reprises All and singular which messuages are worth by the yeare in all issues besides reprises 22. And and that of the same Sheriff the same day of taking the inquisition aforesaid delivered to the said Prudence the cattell aforesaid at the price aforesaid to hold to the same P as her proper cattel and chattles in part of satisfaction of the debt and damages aforesaid and that the said 5. closes late purchased of A.F. the said cloase caled W. Carrmeadow with the grove in the same and the said close called Wellflat The Sheriff draws the moyety out of the Tenements are the true equall moyety of all and singular the lands and Tenements aforesaid which said moyety the aforesaid sheriff of the said county of Derby the same day of the taking of the Inquisition aforesaid made to be delivered to the said Prudence Moyle to hold the same P. as her Free Tenement to her and her assignes according to the Forme of the statute aforesaid Delivery of the moyety untill the residue of the debt damages aforesaid were levied thereof and further by the Inquisition aforesaid it is found that the said R. Turner neither the day of the judgment aforsaid given to wit 6. Nov. An. 17. abovesaid nor at any time afterwards untill then nor at the day of taking the inquisition aforesaid had any other or more lands or Tenements nor any other goods or chattles in his bayliwick to the knowledg of the Jury of that Inquisition which hee could extend or appaise or deliver to the said P. Moyle The Defendant hath no more lands or goods as by the same writ it was commanded him c. M 20. Iac. Rot 3371 Entry of a Writ of Elegit against a Clerk whereupon the Sheriff returned that he is a Clerk and beneficed at Hab non hab laicum foeod And a Writ awarded to extend the goods and lands ecclesiasticall T. 21. H. 6. rot 326. Sequest spec is entred upon the Distring Ex. ad hab Clra. c. spec intr upon the sequestration for issue Brownlow Suff. ss The sheriff was commanded whereas Antony Hobard Esq lately in the court of the Lord the King now to wit at Westminster by the consideration of the same Court had recorded against Thomas Barker late of Holton in the county aforesaid Clerk aswell a certaine debt of 80 l. as 48 s. which to the same Antony in the Court of the king here were adjudged for his damages which he had by occasion of the detayning of the said debt whereof he is convicted the same Antony afterwards came here into the Court of the Lord the King here and by the statute therein provided chose to be delivered to him all the goods and chattles c. As in the writ before untill and in as much as he shall have executed our command aforesaid he should make appeare here at this day to wit 15. Trinit that he should then have here that writ c. and nowhere at this day came the same Antony by E. H. his attorny and the sheriffe to wit W. Whittle Esq now retorneth that the same Thomas Barker is a Clerk and beneficed at H. in the county aforesaid in the dioces of M. having no lay Fee in his bayliwick Therefore it is commanded to the Reverend Father in Christ Samuell by divine permission Bishop of Norwich that all and singular the goods and chattles Eclesiasticall lands and tenements of the same Thomas in the dioces of the same Bishop he should deliver to the said Antony by a reasonable price and extent to hold the goods and chattells aforesaid Note that in T. 13 Ia. upon the motion of Richardson Serjeant the Court then agreed that he should not have an Elegit to the Bpp. but a Fire Facias de bonis ecclesiasticis and thereupon a fiieri fac de bonis ecclesiasticis was made in that case as his proper goods and chattells and also the Lands and Tenements aforesaid as his Free tenement to him and his assignes according to
coexecutor with the said W. of the testament aforesaid is dead prayeth a Writ by the statute c. and it granted to him retornabl here tres Pas and in asmuch c. the sheriff should make appears here at the same Terme c. at which day here came the said W. Scot executor c by his attorny aforesaid and the sheriff sent not the writ P. 12. Jac Rot 448. entry of a Sci fac by the Administrator during the minority of the Executor to have execution against the Conusor where the Conusce died before the Cap. returnable in the Common Bench. c. and as before praieth a writ thereof by the statute c. and it is granted to him retornable here 15. Mich and in asmuch c. the Sheriff should make knowne here at the same Term at which day came the said W. Scot executor c. by his attorny aforesaid and the sheriff sent not the writ c. therefore as more times let another writ thereof be made to him by the statute c. retornable here Men. Pas and so it is continued untill 15 Mich. at which day came the said W. Scot executor c. by his attorney aforesaid and the sheriff sent here a certaine extent before him taken at B. upon Thursday in Cr. S. Mich. Arch. An. 2 H. 6. Post conq by vertue of a certaine Writ of the Lord the King directed to the same Sheriff by the oath of 12 c. who say upon their oathes that the said W Combe had and held to him and his heires comming of his body the day of the acknowledgment of the debt aforesaid 2. gardens with their appurtenances in the Suburbs of B in Pyle-street and six tenements with their appurtenances in the Suburbs aforesaid in S. which said gardens and tenements M B of Bristoll now holdeth Extent returned and are clearly worth by the yeare besids repaires 34 s. and also saith that the said W. Combe had and held to him and his heires comming of his body the same day of the acknowledgment of the debt aforesaid and afterwards 12 s. rent of Assize issuing out of one tenement in the Suburbs aforesaid in Tonkerstreet which A. D. late held which said rent I. D. now holdeth And also saith that the said W. Combe had and held to him and his heires coming of his body the same day of the acknowledgment of the debt aforesaid afterwards 5. shops with their appurtenances scituate c. which the said W. Combe afterwards gave and granted to T. B. Knight his heires and assignes for ever which are clearly worth by the yeare besides reprizes 40 s and also c. wich all and singular messuages lands Tenements shops Sellers Gardens and Rents above recited one N. V. Viccar of the Church of Saint Mary of R. W. M. and others gave and granted long before the acknowledgment of the Debt aforesaid to the said W. Combe to hold to him and his heirs of his body coming for ever by vertue of which gift the said VV. C. of all the aforesaid Mesnes Lands Tenements Shops Cellars Gardens and Rents with the Appurtenances were seised to him and his heirs of his body coming by vertue of the gift aforesaid the day of the acknowledgement of the debt aforesaid and afterwards And further say that the said W. Combe had no other or more Lands Tenements or Rents goods or chattells within the County of Bristoll the day of the acknowledgment of the Debt aforesaid or at any time afterwards which they could extend or appraise as the same Writ requireth as the Jury aforesaid can enquire Fieri Facias T 16. Jac. rot 3112. Brownlow Testat fi fac de bonis propriis after a Devastavit Entry of a Testat fi fac of his proper goods after a Devastavâ—t between D. and B. MIch 12. Jac. rot 2216. Brownlow War ss Entry of a fieri facias where parcell of the mony returned levied and a fi fac awarded for the residue It was commanded the Sheriff that of the lands and Chattells of I. C. late c. otherwise called c. in the Bailiwick of the same Sheriff he should make as well a certain debt of thirty pounds which W. K. in the Court of the Lord the King now of the Common Bench here to wit at Westminster in the County of Middlesex recovered against him as forty shillings which to the same W. in the said Court of the King here were adjudged for his damages which he had by occasion of detaining of that debt and that he should have the monyes here at this day to wit Mens Michaelis to render to the said W. of the Debt and Damages aforesaid whereof he is convicted Return parcell of the debt and damages levied And now here at this day came the said W. by A. L. his Attorney and the Sheriff now returned that hee by vertue of that Writ caused to be made eighty shillings of the Lands and Chattells of of the sayd I. parcell of the debt and damages aforesaid which hee had ready at the day and place aforesayd as by the said Writ it was commanded to the same Sheriff And that the said I. had no other nor more Lands or Chattells in his Bailiwick whereof the residue of the Debt and Damages aforesaid or any parcell thereof he could by any means cause to be made therefore it is commanded to the Sheriff of VVar. that of the Lands and Chattells of the sayd I. in the Bayliwick of the same Sheriff A fi fac awarded for the residue hee make the residue of the Debt and Damages aforesaid and that hee should have the residue of the monyes here to wit in Crâ—pur to render to the same W. in forme aforesaid c. Entry of a fieri facias where the Sheriff returned Nihil habet and a fieri facias awarded to the Ordinary De bonis ecclesiasticis M 11 Jac rot 189. H. 26 Jac rot 3031 M. 14 H 6 rot 124. T 19. Jac. rot 1020. Brownlow Norff. ss It was commanded the Sheiff that of the Lands and Chattells of Edward Mundy late of H. in the County aforesaid Clark otherwise called c. in your Bailiwick he should make as well a certain debt of a hundred pounds which Thomas C. in the Court of the King here recovered against him as ninety shillings which were adjudged for his damages which he had by occasion of the detaining of the said debt and that he should have those monies here at this day to wit Tres Trin to render to the said T. for his debt and damages aforesaid whereof he is convicted And now here at this day came the said Thomas by M. P. his Attorney and the Sheriff to wit E. G. Knight now returneth that the said E. is a Clarke and beneficed at L. in the Diocesse of Norwich having neither goods nor chattells of Lay fee in his Bailiwick whereof the debt and Damages
rot 3157. Brownlow Entry of an Habeas corpus cum causa for B the Sheriff returned that he was detained by vertue of a certain Warrant c. And that he had brought his body c. Pro ut pro breve c. whereupon the said I is committed to the prison of the Lord the King of the Fleet Ib. remans quousque c. M 9. and 10. Eliz. Rot. 1667. London Nota. one Thomas L. one of the Attornies c. was committed to the Fleet upon a warrant from the High Commissioners And one cause of his commitment was expressed in the warrant and the Justices granted him a Writ of Priviledg because he was an atorney with a Corpus cum causa directed to the wardens of the Fleet who returned the warrant in haec verba c. wereupon his body being brought to the bar he was allowed his priviledg and discharged from prison Inquiry H 41. Eliz. Rot 1119 Bark ss Entry of a Writ of inquiry of better issues directed to the Justices of Assises upon a Writ De Distring Balliv Burgeness upon a Cepi corpus by them returned upon a Testat in debt against the late Sheriff for finding petty issues upon return of a Distringas T 6 H 6. Rot. 303. Sil. M 24. H 6. Rot â—09 Issues six shillings eight pence West 2. cap 40. Alias Distringas awarded P 8. H 6. Rot 113 Amercement against the return of the Sheriff upon a Distringas Jur. T 23 H 6. scil upon a Rescous P 226. Rot 2 the like Writ awarded to the Coroners to enquire de quantis exitibus quere quia non est lex Plur. Distringas It was commanded the sheriff that he should distrain the Mayor Baylifes and Burgesses of the Borrough of Abington in the County aforesaid by all their Lands c And that of the issue c. so that he should have here in Osto Mich. last past the body of F. E. late of c. whom the same Mayor and Burgesses late took as c To answer R.B. of a plea that he render unto him 10 l. which to him he oweth and unjustly detaineth c. At which day here came the said R. by I. D. his attorney and offered hmiselfe the fourth day against the same F. in the same plea and he came not c. And C. L. then sheriff of the said county of Berk then here retorned that the said Mayor Bayliffes and Burgesses were distrained by their chattels to the value of 6 s 8 d. And that the said Mayor B. and B. were bayled by I. D and R. R Therefore they in mercy c. And as before it is commanded the sheriff that he should distraine them by all their lands c. And that of the issues c. so that should have here at this day to wit in Oct. S. Hill the body of the said F which the same Mayor B and B of late took c. As c. To answer the said R B. in the plea aforesaid and now here at this day to wit at the said Oct. S. Hilli came the same R by his attorny aforesaid and offered himself the 4 th day against the said F. in the plea aforesaid and he came not And the sheriff did nothing therein nor sent the writ thereof as more times It is commanded the Sheriff that he destrain them by all their lands c. And that of the issues c. so that they may have here 15. Pas the body of the said F who the same M B. and B. of late took as c. to answer the said R in the plea aforesaid And thereupon it is testified in the court of the Lady the Queen here on the behalf of the said R. that the said C. L. late sheriff after the said writ of distresse was first delivered to him of greater issue to wit of 100 l. the lands and Tenements of the said Mayor Bayliffes Burg. in his bayliwick to the Lady the Queen might have answered Averment of the party aginst the sheriff or retorning the petty issues upon â—he first w it of distress after the al 's and plur distr wee reenter upon the Roll. Therefore it is commanded to the Justices of the said Lady the Queen assigned to take the assizâ—s in the county aforesaid that by the oath of honest and lawfull men of the County aforesaid in the presence of the said sheriff if he will be present they diligently inquire of what and how much issues the said sheriff of the issues of the lands and Chattles of the said Mayor B and B. of Abingdon aforesaid in his bayliwick from the time in which the said writ of distresse was delivered unto him untill the said Oct. S. Mich. could have answered to the said Lady the Queen and the inqâ—isition which c. they make knowne here 15 Pas by their letters sealed c. See the old book of entries in the title of issues retorned 1. 2. and 4. for such a Writ and entry And for a Writ awarded to the Justices of Assize see the statute of Westminster the 2. Cap. 40. A djudged to the Justices at the assize to inquire of what issuâ—s the sheriff could answer T 9. lac Rot. 3623. Brownlow Wigor ss It was commanded the sheriff that he should distraine R. G. Knight late sheriffe of the county aforesaid by all his Lands c. So that he should have here at this day to Wit in C S. Trinitatis the body of R. Y. late of C. in the county aforesaid Yomam which he took by the precept of the Lord the King now And detayneth by him as the said sheriff to the Justices of the said Lord the King here to wit at Westminster 15. Pas An. R nunc Angl. 8. retorned to answer to M. F. widow of a plea that he should render unto her 20 l. which to her he oweth and unjustly detayneth c. And to heare his judgment of more defaults c. And now here at this day came the said Mary by I. F. her attorney and the sheriff now retorneth that the said R. G. is distrained by his chattles to the value of 40 s. and bayled by I. D. and R. R Therefore they in mercy Amercement that the sheriff can answer the King of greater Issues c. And here upon it si testified in the court of the King here on the behalf of the said Mary that the said now sheriff of greater issue to wit of 20 l to the said Lord the King could answer therefore it is commanded to the Justices of the Lord the King assigned to take the assizes in the county of Worcest that by the oath of honest and lawfull men of the county aforesaid in the presence of the said sheriff if he will be present Note that the statute saith die impetr Br. they diligently inquire of what and how much issues of the lands and Chattells of the said R. G. the said
by attorney if it shall happen that the said T. P. not to make deliverance of the Cattle aforesaid taken in Withernam or the value of them c. Scire Facias TRini 9. Jac. Roll. 3510. Entry of a Scire facias upon a Recognizance against sureties in Replevin after Averia elongat returned Otherwise as it appeareth in Easter Term in the 9. yeare of the Reign of the Lord the King now Roll. 2982 it is thus contayned London ss It was commanded the sheriffes whereas I. A. of the City of Coventry Taylor B A. of L. in the county of N. clerk and W. S. of C. in the county of Warr Gent. to wit the fift day of Ju being there in Trinity Term in the 7. yeare of the Reigne of the Lord now King of England before Peter W. Knight one of the Justices of the said Lord the King of the common Bench at his chamber in Chancery Lane London in their proper persons undertook and every one of them did undertake for H. A. in the sum of 20 l. and the same H. A. then and there before the said Justices of the Lord the King in his own person undertook for himself in the summ of 40 l. that the same H. should cause to be retorned to David Harris certaine cattle of the same H. formerly taken by the same David and which were adjudged by the court here to the said David for the default of the said Henry The Recognizance recited See the statute West cap 2. 13. E 1. if retorn of them to the same David by the court here should be adjudged which said summe of 20 l. every one of the Manucaptors do acknowledg to be levied upon their lands and chattles And which said sume of 40 l. the same Henry acknowledgeth to be levied of his lands and chattles to the use and behoof of the same David if it happen that the said Hen. make default in the premisses therof be lawfully convicted which said recognizance in Form aforesaid taken afterwards to wit the same fift day of July in the said Term of the holy Trinity in the seventh yeare of the Reigne of the Lord the Keng now of England abovesaid the said Justices of the same court of the said Lord the King before his then Justices with his owne hands delivered to be inroled upon record Delivery of the Recognizance in Court to be inrolled Count upon the second deliverance as by the record thereof remayning in the same court here manifestly appeareth wheras therupon the same David was attached by the writ of the said Lord the King de Sec. Delib to be in the Court here to wit at Westminster aforesaid to answer the same H. A. of a plea wherefore he such a day and year at W. in a certaine place there called Woodpark had taken the cattle that is to say 35. heifers of the same H. and unjustly detayned them against sureties and pledges untill Avowry c. the same David in the said court of the said Lord the King appearing for a certaine reason by him alleaged as Bayliff of G. C. Kt. well acknowledged the taking of the cattle aforesaid in the place aforesaid to be just Nonsuit of the Plaintiff for default of Bar to the Avowry Return Haben awarded whereupon the said Henry afterwards although solemnly called in the same court of the said Lord the King came not nor hath not further prosecuted his said writ wherupon it was considered in the same Court here that the said Hen. and his pledges for prosecution should be in mercy c. And that the same David should goe thereof without day c. and that he should have retorne of the cattle aforesaid to hold to him for ever irreplevishable whereupon the said Lord the King by his writ commanded the sheriff of Devon that without delay he cause to be retorned to the said David the cattle aforesaid to hold to him irreplevishable Averia elongat returned and as much c. he should make to appeare here in Oct. Mich at which day the said sheriff of Devon retorned to the Justices here that before the coming of the said writ to him directed the cattle aforesaid by the said Henry A. were conveyed to places unknown to him so that he could not make retorne of the same cattle of the said David and therefore the said Lord the King commanded the said sheriff of Devon that of other Catles of the same Henry to the value of the Catle aforesaid before taken Capias in Withernam awayded he should take in Withernam and should deliver them to the said David to keep by him untill the cattle aforesaid before taken could be retorned to the same David and that he should put by sureties and safe pledges Nâ—lla averria returned the said Henry that he should be here in Oct. S. Hill aswell to answer the said Lord the King of his contempt as the same Da. of his damages injuries in this behalf done The same sheriff of Devon at that day retorned to the Justices here that the same A. H. had no Cattle in his Bayliwick Sci fac against the party and Manucaptors severally which he could take in Withernam according to the Exigency of that Writ and that the same Henry had nothing in his Bayliwick by which he could be attached as by the record and proceedings in the same court here remayning doth manifestly appeare And because c. That by honest c. it should be made known to the said I. B. W. and H. that they should be herein Oct. Pur. to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same David ought not to have execution against the same I. for the said 20 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged to be levied of his lands and chattles and against the said Bartholomew for the said 20 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged to be levyed of his lands and Tenements and against the said William and others as before The Plaintiff offiers himselfe against the Defendant c. according to the Form of the Recognizance aforesaid if c. And now here at this day came the same David by R R. his attorney offered himself the 4. day against the said I. B W. and H. in the plea aforesaid and they being solemnly called came not the sheriffs of Lond now return that the same I. B. W H. have nothing Nichil returned nor any one of them hath any thing nor are found nor any one of them is to be found c. Therefore as before it is commanded the said sheriffs of London that they should make known to the said I. B. W. and H. that they be here 15. Alias Sci fac awarded Pas to shew in Form aforesaid and now here at this day came aswell the same David by his attorney aforesaid as the same I. B. W. and H. by H. W. their attorny
judgment in a writ de droit de Gard. P. 2. H. 7. Rot. 50 Scire Fac upon a judgment in detinue for Cattle and for Debt ss IT was commanded the sheriff whereas I. P. one of the attornies of the Court of the Lady the Queene here of the common Bench lately in the same court of the Lady the Queen here to wit 1. Feb. An. 25. before F. A. Knight and his associates then Justices of the Lady the Qu. of the common Bench here Entry of a Sci fac against an heire upon a judgment against his father in debt and an Elegit awarded by the consideration of the same Court had recovered against I. K Kt. aswell a certaine debt of 12 l. as 16 s. and 4 d. which to the same I. P. in the same court were adjudged for his damages which he had by occasion of detayning of that debt whereof he is convicted and by the record and proceedings therein in the same court of the Queen here remayning manifestly appeareth Neverthelesse execution of the judgment aforesaid yet remayneth undon M 26 27. Eliz. rot and the same I. K Knight is dead as by the information of the said I P. the Queen understandeth And because c. that by honest c. he make known to I. K. Esquire son and heire of the said I. K. Knight and now tenant of all the Lands and Tenements which were of the said I.K.Kt. in Fee simple at the time of the judgment aforesaid given that he should be here at this day to wit in Cr. Anim to shew if any thing c. wherefore the said 12 l. 6 s. and 13 s. 4 d. ought not to be made of the lands and tenements which were of the said I. K Knight in Fee-simple at the time of giving of the Judgment aforesaid in his bayliwick being in the seisin of the said I. K. the son and rendred to the same I. B. according to the form of the recovery aforesaid And now here at this day came the same I. P. in his proper person and offered himselfe the 4. day against the said I. K. the son in the plea aforesaid And he being solemnly called came not and the sheriff now retorneth that he hath made known to I K the son of being here at this day by I D and R F honest c. Therefore it is considered that the said I P have execution against the said I K the son of the said 12 l. 6 s. and 13 s. 4 d. to be levied of the lands and tenements which were of the said I K Kt. in Fee-simple at the time of giving of the judgment aforesaid being in the seisure of the said I. K. the son by default c. and hereupon the same I. P. hath chosen to be delivered to him the moyety of all the Lands and Tenements which were of the said I. K. Knight in Fee-simple being at the time of the judgment aforesaid given in the seisin of the said I. K. the son to be levied according to the form of the statute thereof made and provided untill the said 12 l. 13 s. 4 d. be thereof levyed and prayeth a writ thereof to be directed to the sheriff of the County aforesaid And it is granted to him retornable here in Oct S. Hill c. quaere de rest forme H 3. Jac. Rot. 308. ss Entry of a Sci fac against an heir and judgement thereupon by default upon a judgement had against the Father deceased in the time of another King It was commanded the sheriff whereas R. S latly in the court of the Lady Eliz. late Queen of England to wit in the Term of the holy Trinity An. 30. before E. A. Knight c. by the consideration of the same Court had recovered against T S late c aswell a certaine debt of 40 l. as 40 s. which c. as by the record and proceedings here in the Court of the Lord the King now here remaining manifestly appeareth notwithstanding execution c. And the same T is dead as by the information of the same R. c. and because c. that by honest c that he make knowne to W S son and heire of the said T. who hath lands and Tenements which were of the said T in Fee simple in Cr. Tri. An. c. or at any time afterwards that hee should be here at this day to wit in Oct. Hill to shew if any thing c. wherefore they ought not to make the debt and damages aforesaid of the lands and Tenements aforesaid being in the county aforesaid and render them to the said R. according to the Form of the Recognizance aforesaid if c. And now here at this day came the same R by I H his attorny aforesaid and offereth himselfe the fourth day against the said W. in the plea aforesaid and he being solemnly called came not and the sheriff now retorneth that he had made known to the said W. son and heire of the said T. and tenant of two messuages and 100. acres of land Scit fac returned with the appurtenances in M. in his county that he should be here at the said Octab. S. Hilli to shew in form aforesaid c. by I. K. and L. I. honest c. and hereupon the same R. prayeth execution against the said W. of the debt and damages of the lands and Tenements aforesaid which were of the said T. in Fee simple in the said morrow of the holy Trinity to him to be adjudged c. Therefore it is considered that the said R. have execution against the said W. of the debt and damages aforesaid to be levied of the tenements aforesaid by default c. Inquire of the forme of this writ P 4. J. Ro. 25 57 Upon a Recovery in debt against G. K son heir of W K. by I. Harper Sci. fac to the Tenants of the lands Tenem which descendeth to the said G. in fee simple from the said William his Father And which were of the said G. 12. die Febr. An. 42 Eliz. which day the said Iohn Harper purchased his originall writ in debt against the said W. that he should be here in Oct. Hill c. Entry of a Sci fac brought by an executor against an h ire upon judgment against his Father c. H Ill. 5. Jac Rot. 1011. Otherwise as it appeareth in the Term of the holy Trinity An. 5. Rot. 9. It is thus contayend Corn. ss It was commanded the sheriff whereas W. W. Gent. lately in the court of the Lady Eliz. late Queen of England to wit in Mich. Term An. 37 and 38. before E A Knight and his associates then Justices of the said late Queen in the Bench here to wit at Westminster had recovered against I C late of c. aswell a certaine debt of 40 l. which c. as 40 s. which c. put c. Execution notwithstanding c. and aswell the said
W. as the said W W are dead as by the information of W S executor of the testament of the said W W the King understands and because c. that by honest c. he make known to C C Gent. son and heire of the said I and now Tenant of all the lands and Tenements which were of the said I in Fee-simple at the time of giving the judgment aforesaid that he should be here at this day to wit in Cr Trin. to shew if any thing c. wherefore the debt and Damages aforesaid ought not to be made of the lands and tenements of the said I. in Fee-simple at the time of the judgment aforesaid given being in the seisin of the said C in the county aforesaid according to the form of the recovery aforesaid and now here at this day came aswel the said W S by I B his attorney as the said C by P K his attorny and the sheriff now retorneth that he by vertue of the writ aforesaid to him directed die tali An. by E D and W W honest Sci fac tenenti terr returned c. made known to the said C son and heire of the said I and tenant of 1 Messuage and 10. acres of land c. in C in the county aforesaid which were of the said I C in Fee-simple at the time of the judgment aforesaid given that he should be here at this day to shew if any thing wherefore the debt and damages aforsaid ought not to be made of the lands and Tenements aforesaid being in the seisin of the said I and rendred to the said W S according to the forme of the recovery aforesaid And hereupon the said W S bringeth here into court the letters testamentary of the said W W by which it is sufficiently manifest to the Court here the same W S to be executor of the testament aforesaid and thereof to have the administration c. and prayeth execution against the said C of the debt and damages aforesaid of the lands and Tenements aforesaid to him to be adjudged c. and hereupon the same C prayeth licence thereof to imparle here c. untill Oct. Hill c. at which day here came aswell the same W as the same C by their attornies aforesaid and hereupon the same W S as before prayeth execution against the said C of the debt and damages aforesaid of the lands and Tenements aforesaid to be adjudged to him c. ANd the said C saith that the said W execution against him as son and heire of the said T C of the debt and damages aforesaid ought not to have because he saith that he hath not Monstrans de testament Bar riens per discent Quere nor at any time after the judgment aforesaid given had any lands or tenements by hereditary discent from the said I his Father in Fee-simple whereof the debt and damages aforesaid could be made and this he is ready to verifie whereupon he prayeth judgment of the said W S execution against him as son and heire of the said I of the debt and damages aforesaid ought to have c. ANd the said W S saith that by any thing before alledged Replication that he had assets by discent at the teste of the Sciâ— fac he ought not to be barred from having his execution against the said C as son and heire of the said I of the debt and damages aforesaid because he saith that the same C before the day of the judgment aforesaid given and the day of purchasing the said writ of Scire fac to wit tali die An. had sufficient lands and tenements by hereditary discent from the said I. his father in Fee-simple whereof he might have satisfied the said W S of the debt and damages aforesaid to wit at C aforesaid and this he prayeth may be inquired of by the Country and the same C likewise Therefore 12 c. Continuance of a Scire facias ss AT which day here came the said Plaintiff by his attorny aforesaid And the sheriff sent not the writ Therefore let the defendant as before be premonished that he be here in Ost. S. Mich. to shew in Forme aforesaid c. Sci fac by the surviving Administrator of goods of the first intestate not administred by the first administrator T 16. Jac. Rot. 3109. London Int. G and H Scire fac by the surviveing administrator of the goods of the first intestat of goods not administred by the first administrator Sci fac brought upon a Devastavits post An. diem T 19. Jac. Rot. 1779. Scire fac to have execution de bonis propriis upon a devastavit retorned post An and diem Sci fac brought against the administrator by the executor at his full age upon a judgment had against the intestate by the administrator during the minority of the Infant H 7. Jac. Rot 109. Brownlow London ss It was commanded the sheriff whereas I B and H G administrators of the goods and chattles which were of I W during the minority of Margaret W executrix of the testament of the said I W lately in the court of the Lady Eliz. late Queen of England to wit in Mich. term An. 27. and 28. before E A Knight and his associats then justices of the said Lady the Qu. of the Common Bench here to wit at Westminster by the consideration of the same Court had recovered against W D late c. otherwise called c. aswell a certaine debt or 160 l. as 98 s. which c. whereof he is convicted as by the record and proceedings therein in the court of the Lord the King now here remayning manifestly appeareth execution notwithding of the judgment aforesaid yet resteth to be done and the said W is dead Averment of the full age of the executrix and the death of the Defendant And the same Margaret after the judgment aforesaid therein given is come to the full age of 21. yeares and afterwards took to husband one Tho. Knight as by the information of the said T. and M executrix of the testament of the said I W deceased the King hath understood And because c. by honest c they should make knowne to W D and Margaret his wife Administratrix of the goods and Chattells which were of the said W D who died instated Sci fac awarded against the administratrix of the defendant c. at the time of his death That they should be here at this day to wit in Oct. Hill to shew if c. wherefore the same Thomas and Margaret his wife execution against them of the debt and damages aforesaid of the goods and Chattles which were of the said W D at the time of his death being in the hands of the said W and M his wife to be administred ought not to have c. according to the Form of the recovery aforesaid if c. and an al
Sci. fac awarded ret Oct. Pur. Defendants appeare non sunt inven c. and hereupon the same T and M his wife bring here in court the letters Testamentary of the said Io. Wright by which it appeareth to the Court here the same Margaret to be executrix of the testament aforesaid The Plaintiff shewes Letters of administration of the will Averment that the defendant died intestate and thereof to have the Administration c. and the same Tho. and M his wife further say that the same W D after the judgm aforesaid given at L. in the parish c. died intestat And that the administration of all the goods and Chattels which were of the said W D at the time of his death by Io. by Divine providence c. after the death of the said W to Margaret now wife of the said W D. while she was sole at London in the parish and ward aforesaid was committed which said Margaret after the judgment aforesaid given at London in the parish and ward aforesaid took to husband the same W D And pray execution against the said W D and Margaret his wife of the debt and Damages aforesaid See the new Book of Entries f 623. Pl 9. tiel Sci fac respectuat judicium Quere of the goods and Chattells which were of said W Dowgle at the time of his Death in the hands of the said W Death and M his wife being to belevied to them to be adjudged c. Null Judgm quaere if the executor at his ful age shall have such a Scire fac upon a Recover by the administrator during the minority of the executor or not Tri. 9 Jac Rot 1619. and afterwards satisfaction was acknowledged upon this entrey without any judgment Mich. 44. and 45. E. Rot. 2816 Sci fac against Tertenant Scire fac in debt to the lands tenements of the lands tenements c. according to the form of the Recovery aforesaid if c. And now here at this day came the said A. by I. H. his attorney and offered himselfe the 4th day against the said Tenants of the Lands and tenements aforesaid in the plea aforesaid And they being solemnly called came not Nul Tertenant returned and the sheriff now retorneth that there is no tenant of any lands or Tenements which were of the said I. at the time of the judgment aforesaid given or at any times afterwards in his Bailiwick whereby he might make knowne to him whereas it is testified in the said Court of the said Queen here that there are divers Tenants of Lands and Tenements in the County of Norff. which were of the said I. at the said time of the judgment aforesaid given and afterwards whereof they could make and levey the debt and damages aforesaid Averment that there are divers Tenants in another County A Testat Sci. fac awarded after non-suits returned Therefore it is commanded to the said Sheriff of Norff. that by honest c. be make knowne to the tenants of the lands and tenements which were of the said I at the time of the judgment aforesaid given or at any time afterwards that he be here in Oct. S. Hill to shew in form aforesaid if c Al. Sci. fac against the Administrator upon judgement against the Intestate T 22 Jac. rot 629 the same Al. Sci. fac awarded M 44 and 45 Eliz. rot 3118. Brownlow ss Otherwise as it appeareth c. And now here at this day came the said R. N. by I his Attorney and offered himself the fourth day against the said G. in the plea aforesaid and he being solemnly called came not and the Sheriff now returneth That the said G hath nothing c. nor is found c. therefore as before the Sheriff is commanded that by honest c. he make known to the said G that he should be here in Cr. Animarum to shew in Forme aforesaid if c. At which day here came the said I by his Attorney aforesaid and the same G the fourth day of the plea being solemnly called came not and the sheriff as before now returneth that the said G hath nothing c. nor is found c. And hereupon the sayd R. I. saith That the said Defendant dyed intestate c. and that the administration of the goods and chattels which were of the said Intestate at the time of his death The plaintiff saith that the Administration was committed to the Defendant against whom the Sci. fac issueth by Iohn by divine Providence Arch Bishop of Canterbury c. such a day and year at London in the parish c. after the death of the said intestate to the said G was committed and prayeth Execution against the said G. of the Debt and Damages aforesaid in form aforesaid to him to be adjudged c. Therefore it is considered That the said I have Execution against the said O of the Debt and damages aforesaid of the goods and chattells which were of the said R. H. at the time of his death being in the hands of the said O to be administred to be levied if he have so much in his hands to be administred by default of the said O. c. Trin. 13. Jac. rot 526. Brownlow into H. and H. Entry of a Sci. fac with cas testat thereupon awarded T 12 Jac. rot 2524. Brownlow ss Civitas Exon C P. against B. E. in a Scire facias c. Re. Cr. Trin. By Default c. And hereupon the said C prayeth a writ of the said Lord the King to be directed to the Sheriffs of the City of Exon to take the same R if c. to satisfie the said C of the Debt and Damages aforesaid c. And it is granted to him returnable here Tres Trin. At which day here came the same C in his proper person and the Sheriff now returneth That the said R is not found Reurn of the Cap. Testat awarded Devon c. and hereupon it is testified in the same Court here that the same Richard doth lye hid wander c. run from plac to place in the County of Devon Therefore it is commanded to the sayd sheriff of Devon that he take him if c. and safely keep c. so that he should have his body here in Cro. Animarum to satisfie the said Christopher of the debt and damages aforesaid c. Entry of an al. Sci. fac upon judgement had against the principall upon an arrest upon an originall in debt sued out in the Common Bench and a capias thereupon in another Terme wherein the first Sci. fac was returnable in a former Terme T. 20. Jac. rot 3186. Note that the first writ of Sci. fac in this case ought to issue from hence out of the Philizers office returnable in the Prothonotaryes office T 13 Jac rot 2621. Brownlow Otherwise as it appeareth in Easter Terme Anno 13 Regis nunc Rotulo It
Assizes and Execution therein awarded at B. before the day in the Bench. P 28. H 8. rot 438. Ayde of the King granted in a Scire facias to execute a fine between Melton and the Earle of Northumberland EAster 34 Edw. 1. rot 27. A sci fa. brought by the King upon a judâ—ment in an assise Darrein presentment had by the King by reason of the wardship of an ideot brought against man and wife an estranger upon disturbance Defendant pleads that the lessor was respited untill 8 Hil. for default of the Recognitors c. ss It was commanded the sheriff that whereas the Lord the King in the Court here to wit in 8 sancti Martini Anno Reg. 21. had recovered against H C. and I his wife and R. B. the presentation to the Church of W hy reason of the Lands of R. W. a Fool and in the Kings custody by which it was commanded the Bishop of Winchester that notwithstanding wreck-land of the said I and R. B. hee should admit of a fit Parson to the said Church at the Presentation of the King by vertue of which said command the said Bishop admitted one I S his Clerke at his presentation to the Church aforesaid and the said Church by the resignation of the said I. S. Clerke is now void and belongeth to his Donation by reason of the custody aforesaid the same H. I. and R. B. do not permit the sayd King to present a fit parson to the Church aforesaid in contempt of the Lord the King c. and his immoderate losse and vexation We command you that by honest c. you shall make known c. to shew c. wherefore the Lord the King ought not to present a fit parson to the Church aforesaid by reason of the custody aforesaid c. And now here at this day came N. W. who followeth for the Lord the King and the same H. and R. came not and the sheriff now testifieth that he made known to them of being here c. by T. D. and F. E. whereupon the said N. W. who c. prayeth Execution by default of the said H. and R. And hereupon came the said Ioane and one Isabel the wife of the said R. and the same Joane assevering the same Advowson to be the right of the said Ioane and the same Isabell assevering the same Advowson to be the right of the same Isabell say That the Lord the King now by that writ nor also by vertue of the Record from whence that Writ issued ought not to have Execution therein because the said Isabel saith That she is joyntly enfeoffed of the advowson aforesaid together with the said R her husband and prayeth that she for default of her husband c. and prayeth to be admitted c. and the same Joan well knoweth that the Lord the King otherwise in the Court of the King here in Cro saucti Martini Anno supradict superdico arrayed the said Assize ult praesentationis against the said H. the same Ioan and the same R of the advowson of the Church aforesaid at which said assize they personally appearing pleaded and then put themselves upon that Assize so that then it was considered that the said Assize should be taken but that it should be respited here untill in 8 Hil then next following for defect of Recognitors c and say that afterwards in the same that Assize depending thereof between them undecided The Attorney confesseth the action without warrant in deceit of his client as is before said the Attorney of them the said H and Iâ—and of the said R again appeared in the same Court without warrant and granted to the said Lord the King presentation to the said Church that turne c. reserving the right of the said H I and R when they would speake therein wherefore whereas that Court had no authority or Jurisdiction to admit of the grant of the attorney of the said A I and R of the Advowson of the Church aforesaid upon the said Writ of Assize ultimo praesentationis which was respited here untill another Term to come pray judgement if any Execution upon such grant after the said Assize as aforesaid was respited ought to be made c. And because this same is found by the Record of the same Rolls of this Terme it is considered that the said Ioan and Isabell go thereof without day c. and whatsoever shall be done by pretence of the said Grant made after the Assize aforesaid was respited as aforesaid Judgment against the King shall be null and void and the Lord the King may bring an originall writ c. P 27 Edw. 1. rot 127 ss A Scire facias for the Tenant against the Vouchee to shew if any thing Scire facias brought by a Tenant in recovery to have execution of Lands in value against the voucher c. wherefore the Tenements aforesaid of the lands of the said Vouchee to the value of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in a competent place hee ought not to have c. Judgement against the plaintiff in Sci. fac for execution of a fine H 5 H 6 rot 304 ss In a Scire facias for executing a fine judgement was given against the plaintiff as followeth therefore it is considered that the said Plaintiff shal take nothing by his writ of scire facias but that the said Defendant go there of without day c. Sci fac upon a judgement in debt where the Defendant before execution fraudulently conveyed his lands and took sanctuary to the intent to defeat the plaintiff of his debt ss T 71 H 4 rot 109. Scire facias against one that made a Feoffment of his Tenements by Fraud and Covin and tooke Sanctuary but the said Defendant intending the plaintiff from the Execution of his debt and damages aforesaid maliciously to retard gave and granted divers lands and Tenements goods and chattells within his Bailiwick to divers certain persons by collusion between them had to wit that the Defendant should receive the profits thereof to his own use which same Defendant the profits thereof notwithstanding the said gift received and yet doth receive and fled to the liberty of the Abbot of W. and within the same Liberty stayed and there liveth upon the profits of his Lands and Tenements goods and chattells aforesaid as by the information c. praying according to the Form of the statute in this case made to be provided of a fit remedy in this behalf c. and because c. M 3 H 4 rot 11 5. ss Scire fac for Execution of Damagesr recovered in an Assize of fresh force in the City of Canterbury Sci. fac for damages in an assize of fresh force also for forty shillings according to the forme of the statute thereof made for that that the Defendant brought not the Record by him pleaded in Barr of the Assize according to the forme of the
Tenant had not duly made his execution Suff. ss It was commanded the sheriff whereas William Ayleff Esquire Barbara his wife lately in the court of the Lady the Queen here to wit at Westminster by the consideration of the same Court had recovered their seisin against I. A. of the third part of the Mannor of Abbotts with the appurtenances in D. c. and whereas also at the prosecution of the same W. and B out of the said Court of the Lady the Queen here of and upon the judgment aforesaid to wit the 6. day of November An. 42. Eliz. issued forth a certaine writ of the Lady the Queen de Sesina directed to the sheriff of the county aforesaid By which said Writ the said Lady the Queen commanded the said sheriff that he should know that the same W and B. in the Court of the Lady the Queen of the common Bench here to wit at VVestminster aforesaid had recovered their seisin against the said I. of the said third part of the Mannor of Abbotts in the appurtenances and 8 messuages c. with the appurtenances as the Dower of the said Barbara of the indowment of Martin A. her late husband c. whereupon the said Lady the Queen now to the said sheriff commandeth that the said W. and B. full seisin of the third part aforesaid with the appurtenances to hold to them in severalty by meats and bounds he should cause to be had and in as much as he should that precept of the Lady the Queen he should make appeare to the Justices of the Lady the Qu. here to wit at VVestminster in 8. Hill then next following which said Writ of seisin afterwards to wit the 16. day of Ianuary then next following at Y. aforesaid in the county aforsaid to E. B. Esquire then sheriff of the County aforesaid being was delivered to be executed in Form of Law And also by the information of the said W. and B. the same Lady the Queen hath understood that the said Edward favouring the same I. A. and indeavouring wholely to defraud the same W. and B of the recovery of the third part aforesaid afterwards to wit the 17. day of Jan. An. 43. abovesaid caused to be had to the same W. and B. full seisin of 1 Messuage in E aforesaid late in the tenure c. to hold to the same W. and B as the Dower of the same B. of the Indowment of the said Martin her late husband in the same mannor of A. and to the Tenements and Rents aforesaid in Y. c. contingent as by the Record and proceedings here in the same Court of the said Lady the Queen remayning manifestly appeareth whereas notwithstanding all and singular the Tenements aforesaid to the same W. B. by the said Ed. Bacon for the third part of the Mannor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances in Forme aforesaid delivered and assigned are not parcell of the mannor lands and Tenements aforesaid wherof the same W. and B. have recovered their third part in forme as aforesaid to the immoderate damage and grievances of the said W. and B. whereupon they have supplycated the said Lady the Queen to adhibet to them a fit remedy in this behalfe the same Lady the Queen not being willing in any wise to injure the same W. and B. But being willing that compleat justice be don and used to them in this behalfe that by honest c he should make known to the same I. that he should be here at this day to wit in 8. Mi. to shew if any thing c. Wherefore omitting the Tenements aforesaid to the same W. B in Form aforesaid delivered and assigned the same W. B seisin and execution of the said third part of the mannor Tenements and Rents aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof the said W. and B. have recovered their third part in Form as aforesaid according to the Form of the recogniz aforesaid against the same I. ought not to have if c. THe Defendant appeareth and saith that the said W. and A. any further execution of the third part aforesaid of the mannor and Tenements c. aforesaid with the appurtenances by them above recovered against him ought not to have because he sayeth that well true it is c. And confesseth the Recovery the writ of seisin and the return thereupon and that the Defendant entred into the land and further saith That the said messuage 3. acres of Land c. in D. aforesaid to the same W. B by the same E. B. for the third part of the mannor c. in Form aforesaid delivered and assigned are parcell of the mannor and Tenements whereof the same W. B. have recovered their seisin of the third part abovesaid in Form as aforesaid and this c. Judgment for the Tenant upon the demurrer And demurrer for that the writ lyeth not but afterwards an other Writ generall was brought And it was adjudged to be well brought See Hill 25. Rot. 650. P. 9. Jac. rot 656. Entry of a Sci. fac in a Quare Impedit T 30. Eliz. rot 1308. Lincoln ss It was commanded the sheriff whereas Thomas Beverly Gent. in the Court of the Lady the Queen now here to wit in the Term of of S. M. An. Eliz. 28. and 29. before Ed. Anderson Knight and his associats then Justices of the said Lady the Qu. of the Bench here by the consideration of the same Court had recovered his presentation against Iohn Arch. Bpp. of Canterbury and G. Cornwall his Clerk of the Church of Somerby in the County aforsaid being void and belonging to his gift by writ of the said Lady the Queen de Quare impedit as by the record and proceeding therein in the same Court here remayning it manifestly appeareth Execution notwithstanding of the judgment aforesaid yet resteth to be don as by the information of the said Thomas the Queen understandeth and because c. that by honest c. he should make known to the said Arch Bpp. and Gabriel that they should be here at this day to wit in Cr. S Tri to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same Thomas execution against them ought not to have according to the Form of the recognizance aforesaid if c. And now here at this day came aswell the said Thomas by VVilliam Be. his attorny as the same Arch Bpp. and Gabrill by R. P. their attorney And here upon the said Thomas prayeth Execution of the judgments aforesaid against the said Arch. Bpp. and G. to him to be adjudged Saith nothing but the ordinary c. and the same Arch Bishop defenderth the force and wrong when c. and nothing in Bar of the execution of the said Thomas saith whereby the said Thomas remayneth against the said Arch. Bpp. thereof without defence Therefore it is considered that the same Thomas have execution of the judgments aforesaid against the said Arch-Bishop according to
with the appurtenances according to the Extent aforesaid to the said Edward should be delivered and c. And hereupon the sheriff is commanded that he remove the same Hum. from the possession of the mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances and the moyety of the same Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances according to the Extent aforesaid without delay he should cause to be delivered And in asmuch c. the sheriff make to appeare here 15. Hill at which day here came the said Edward by his Attorney aforesaid and the sheriff of the said County of Stafford to wit R. M. Esquire now returneth that he by vertue of the writ aforesaid to him directed the 20 day of January An. c. 10. came to the mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances And the same Humphery P from the possession of the Mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances removed And the moyety of the same mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to wit one Close called the Mills of the yearly in all issues besides reprises 8 l. and so recite such premisses as are expressed in the Writ by the first Inquisition unto beyond reprizes 4 l. being the equall and just moyety of the whole Mannor and of all the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to the same Edward B. made to be delivered according to the extent aforesaid in the Inquisition aforesaid above made as by the said Writ it was commanded to him c. Entry of a Sci. fac against the Conusee in a statute merch brought by the conusor to have back the possession of lands extended for that he is satisfied M. 47. E. 3. fo 11 Pl. 9. fit Sci. fac 96. T. 17. E. 3. fo 43. Pl. 38. T 19 Jac. rot 2159. Brownlow London ss It was commanded the sheriffs that they should take the body of Thomas Leake of L. in the County of Nottingham Gent. if he were a Lay-man and in the prison of the Lord the King under their custody should safely keep untill unto G. Woodnot of S in the same County Gent. of four hundred pounds which the same Thomas the thirtieth day of October Anno Regni c. 4. before I. R. then Mayor of the City of Lincolne and Leonard Carr Clark deputed to take the Recognizance of Debts within the City acknowledged himselfe to owe to the said George and which to him at the Feast c. then next following he ought to have paid and the same to him hitherto he hath not payd as it is said and insomuch as shall be executed of that precept of the Lord the King they should make knowne to the Justices of the said Lord the King at Westminster in Cr. S Trinitatis An. Rs. c. 18 And the same sheriff to the Justices of the Lord the King at Westminster at that day retorned H. 17. Jac. rot 293 â— L. a. R. and F. the like Scire fac upon a promise that the conusee is satisfied pro fluxum temporis That the said Thomas was not found in their bayliwick Therefore it was commanded to the sheriff of B. that all the goods and Chattles of the same Thomas and all his Lands and Tenements whereof the same Thomas at the day of the acknowledgment of the debt aforesaid or at any time afterwards was seised unto those hands soever they have came unlesse they descend to some heir being within age by hereditary descent you cause to be delivered to the said George by resonable price and extent to hold to him the goods and Chattles aforesaid as his proper goods and Chattels And to hold the Lands and Tenements aforesaid as his Free Tenements to him and his assignes according to the Forme of the statute thereof provided untill the Debt aforesaid together with reasonable Damages costs charges as in labours suits delayes and expences he had therein levied T 39 Eliz rot 1711. the Defendant after judgment and before execution makes a Feoffment in fee to I S who enfensss J N and then the lands are extended the second Feoffee bring the moneys into the Court and prayeth restitution the Plaintiff warned comes and receives the money and restitution was awarded and in asmuch as the said sheriff had executed the said precept of the said Lord the King he should make appeare to the Justices of the said Lord the King at Westm from the day of the holy Trinity in three weeks An. R. c. 18. At which day Humphery Foster Baronet sheriff of the County of Berke then returned to the justices of the Lord the said King at Westm a certaine Inquisition before him at Winsor in the County aforesaid the first day of Iuly then last past taken by which it was then found that the said Thomas after the Recognizance of the Debt aforesaid and at the time of taking of that Inquisition was seised in his Demesn as of Fee and right of and in the Mannor of W. otherwise E. W. and also of the Scite and Mansion house of the same mannor of W. otherwise E. W. And so recite the whole Inquisition verbatim unto the issues besides reprises of 50 l. which said mannor and Scite and of the mannor aforesaid with all their appurtenances the sheriff aforesaid the first day of July delivered by the extent aforesaid to the said George to hold to him and his assignes as his Free Tenement untill the Debt aforesaid together with the reasonable and necessary Damages costs and charges should be levyed thereof as by the same writ and returne thereof in the same Court of the Lord the King here of Record remayning manifestly appeareth And although after the taking of the Inquisition aforesaid the said George was satisfied of his Debt Damages costs necessary and resonable charges Neverthelesse the same G. possession of the Mannor Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances yet holdeth as by the information of the said Th. the King understandeth The Lord the King willing to do in this behalfe what is just and consonant to reason doth command the sheriffs of London that by honest and lawfull men of their bayliwick they should make knowne to the said George W. that he should be here at Westminster in Crastino S. Trinitatis to shew if any thing c. Testat Sci Fac awarded wherefore the same George whereas to him of his Debt Damages Costs and resonable and necessary charges it hath been satisfied possession of the mannor and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances he ought or can hold At which day the sheriff returne to the Justices of the Lord the King here that the said G. hath nothing in their bayliwick whereby they could make knowne to him neither was found in the same whereas it was Testified in the same Court of of the Lord the King here that he hath sufficient in the County of Nott. whereby the same sheriff can make knowne to him whereupon it was commanded to the
pray execution against the said Ter-tenants of the Debt and Damages of the severall Lands and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances which were of the said Richard at the time of the judgment aforesaid given to be adjudged to them Execution by default c. Therefore it is considered that the same Samuel and Iohn have Execution for the debt and Damages aforesaid against the said severall Tenants of the said severall Lands and Tenements with the appurtenances by default of the said severall tenants to be levyed c. And hereupon the same Sam. and Iohn have chosen to be delivered to them the moyety of the severall Lands and Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances to hold as their Free tenement to them and their assignes according to the forme of the statute therein made and provided untill the Debt and Damages aforesaid shall be thereof levied Elegit awarded and pray a Writ of the Lord the King to be directed to the sheriff of the county aforesaid and it is granted to them retornable here from the day of the holy Trinity in three weeks c. P 39. Eliz. Rot 1347. a Scire facias against Ter-tenants 2. are retorned 1. makes default and the execution awarded against him of the Lands whereof he is Tenant And the other Tenant pleads c. H 7. Eliz. Rot. 1357. divers testats Scire fac awarded into severall Counties at one time against the Ter-tenants M 7. Jac Rot. 45. in t Plit ter Brownlow Nott. ss It was commanded the sheriff Scire fac brought by the heire and exec of the demandant to have execution of a judgment in an Assize of nusance quod nocumentum amoveatur and for damages after the record of the assize is certified unto the Bench 43. E. 3. 2. br Execut. 3 z. accord Assize of nusans brought in Confinio Com. P. 10. H. 4 Rot. 225. Scire fac brought by the heire of the defendant upon the recovery in an assize to have execution upon the land and the tenant pleads no tenure for want whereas latly to wit upon Monday the 21 day of September An of the reigne of the Lord the King now 5. before T. G. Knight and Leonard B. Esq and N. C. Esq late Justices assigned to take the Assizes of the said Lord the King in the Countyes of No L. at D. P. in the same C. of L. and at Ha. in the said C. of Nott by the recognitors of the same Assize of Nusans it is found that Tho. Conians Esq unjustly without Judgment raysed a certaine banck in B. in the County of Nott. to the hurt of the Free Tenement of Tho. Taylor Esq in D. aforesaid within 30. yeares now last past to wit whereas the same T. T. was seised of and in one Close of pasture contayning by estimation 100. acres with the appurtenances called D. Carres in D. aforesaid in his demesne as of Fee And whereas also the same T. T. is likewise and of a long time was seised of and in one Close of pasture contayning by estimation 40. Plaint in an assiz of nusans acres with the appurtenances called H. in B. aforesaid in his demesne as of Fee nere adjoyning to the same Close of pasture called D. C. And the same T. T. and all those whose estate the same T T. then had in the same close of pasture of the same T. T. called D. C. from the time whereof the memory of man is not to the contrary good presedent have had and were accustomed to have a certain gutter or Sewer leading of and from the same close called D. C. through the same close of the said T.T. called H. otherwise H. and from thence unto the common River called the Fosse in the county of Lincoln aforesaid in which said Gutter the water running falling and flowing in and upon the same close of pasture of the same T. T. called D. C. from time to time and by the whole time abovesaid was continually accustomed and wont to run through the same close of the same T. C. called H. otherwise H. and from thence unto the said common river called the Fosse and the same T. T. being so seised of the same close of pasture called D. C and of the same Gutter in F. aforesaid and the same T. T. being likewise seised of the same close of pasture called H. otherwise H. in F. aforesaid the same T. C. before the purchasing of the originall writ of the assize aforesaid to wit the 21. day of May An. Rs. nunc 5. a certaine banck in and upon the same gutter in the same close of the same T T. being unjustly and without judgment made erected and exalted And the watercourse into the gutter aforesaid from the same close called D. C. falling and descending and being wont to fall and descend into the gutter aforesaid by the exalting making and erecting of the banck aforesaid obstructed and stopped by reason whereof the water in and upon the same close of the said T. T. called D C. from the time of the exalting making and erecting of the banck aforesaid running falling and descending from the same close of the said T. T. by the ancient course through the said close of the said T. T. And from thence unto the said common river called the F. aforesaid as before it was wont accustomed to run and to be convayed is hindred where by the water by the gutter aforesaid out of and from the same close of the same T. T. by its ancient course descending and running untill the banck aforesaid newly exalted back againe in and upon the said close of the said T. T. doth reflow and over-flow the same Close whereby that close by the overflowing aforesaid became Sterrill and unfertill And the same T. T. the Profit of his close by a long time to wit from the said 21. day of May untill the day of purchasing of the originall Writ of the assize aforesaid to wit the 22. day of June An. Rs. nunc 5. abovesaid lost to the nocument of the Free tenement of the same T. T whereupon before the same Justices it was considered that the hurt aforesaid by the view of the Recognitors aforesaid should be removed and that the banck aforesaid should be cast downe Iudgmenn in an assize of nusans so that the water aforesaid by the gutter aforesaid through the same close of the same T. T. called H. otherwise H. and from thence unto the common River called the Fosse in the same County of Lincolne into its ancient course at the charge of the said T. it should be reduced and that the said T. T. should recover against the same T.C. his damages to eight pounds by the Recognitors of the Assize aforesaid assessed and also 8 l. and ten shillings to the same T.C. at his request for his costs and charges at the discretion of the Justices here adjudged of encrease which sayd Damages in the whole do amount to
said Debt and damages aforesaid and because we will that those things which before our Chiefe Justice were rightly acted and known to be duely executed we command you that by honest c you should make knowne to the said A. and W that they be before our justices at Westminster quinq Pas to shew if any thing c. to wit the same A. wherefore the same 160 l. by the same A. in Forme aforesaid acknowledged to be made of his Lands and Chattles and the same W. wherefore the said 80 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged to be made of his lands and Chattles and to the same Richard ought not to be rendred according to the Form of the Recognizance aforesaid if c. And have you there the names c. And this writ c. Test 14. Aprillis An. c. 22. Entry of a Scire fac in an audita qâ—erela M 21. Jac. rot Brownlow ss Whereas wee were â—nformed by the great complaint of S. A. Clerk that whereas one R. B. lately in the Court to wit in Hillary Terme An. c. 19. before our Justices at Westminster had recovered against the same S. aswell a certaine debt of 12 l. as 40 s. which c. whereof he is convicted And although the same S. in execution of the Debt and Damages aforesaid by vertue of a certain Writ of ours of Capias ad satisfaciendum thereof to our sheriff of Lincolne directed by Edward Hussey Knight and Baronet late sheriff of the same County at the suit of the same Richard was taken and imprisoned and by the same sheriff out of the same prison was permitted to goe at larg whither he would and from the execution aforesaid was delivered As by the same S. by waies and meanes convenient is ready to informe Neverthelesse the same Richard for the debt and Damages aforesaid against the same S. upon the recovery aforesaid hath againe now prosecuted and unjustly hath procured the same S. for that occasion againe to be taken and hitherto to be detayned in our Prison unto the immoderate Damage and grievance of the said S whereupon he hath be sought us to adhibit to him a fit remedy And because we will not that the same S. be injured in this behalfe And being willing to doe what is just we commanded our Justices that hearing the complaint of the same S. in this behalfe and calling before them the parties aforesaid and hearing their reasons therein they cause to be done to the same S. full and speedy justice as of right and according to the Law and custom of our Realm of England ought to be done we command you that by honest c you make knowne to the said Richard that he be here c. retornable Oct. Hill Test 30. Oct. An. 21. c. Scot. 47. H 20. Jac. in Mr. Brownlowes remembrance litera B. ss Entry of a Sci fac after a Sci. fac against Ter-Tenants Whereas wee have lately by our writ we have commanded the sheriffs of London that by honest and Lawfull men of their Bayliwick they should make knowne to the Tenants of the lands and Tenements which were of F. C. late of W. c. otherwise called c. in Fee-simple from the day of S. Martin c. An. 42. Eliz. Regin which day E. G. in the Court of the said late Lady the Queen of the Common Bench at Westminster before E. A. c. by the consideration of the same court had recovered against the said F aswell a certaine debt of 24 l. as 6 l. which to the same Edmond in the same Court were adjudged c. whereof he is convicted or at any time afterwards in their bayliwick that they should be before our Justices at Westminster in Oct. Pur. S. Mariae last past to shew if they had or knew any thing for themselves to say wherefore the Debt and Damages aforesaid of the lands and tenements which were of the said F at the time of the judgment aforesaid given or at any time afterwards in the seisin of the same Tenants in your Bayliwick ought not to be made and rendred to the said Edmond according to the Forme of the recovery aforesaid if it shall seeme expedient to them and our sheriffs of London to our said Justices at Westminster at that day retorned that there were not any Tenants of any of the lands or Tenements which were of the said Francis at the time of the judgment aforesaid given or at any time afterwards who had any thing where or by which they could make knowne to them whereupon it was testified in our said Court on the behalfe of the said Edmond that there are divers Tenants of divers lands and Tenements which were of the said F at the time of the judgment aforesaid given in the County of Suff. to whom the same sheriff may make knowne Good president Therefore it was commanded to the same sheriff of Suff. that by honest and lawfull men of his bayliwick he should make knowne to the Tenants of the Lands and Tenements which were of the said F. R. in Fee-simple at the said 15. S. Martin An. 42. abovesaid that they should be before our Justices at Westminster 15. Pas last past to shew if they had or knew any thing for themselves to say wherefore the debt and Damages aforesaid ought not to be made of the Lands and Tenements and rendred to the same E. in Form aforesaid And our said sheriff of Suff. to wit W. H. Esq to our said Justices at Westminster at that day renorned that he by P. K. and L. S. honest and lawfull men of his bayliwick made knowne to certaine F. B. Esq Tenant of the mannor of P. with the appurtenances in W. in the same County of Suff. And to R. L. Gent. Tenant of the rectory of the Church of L. in the County of S. which were of the said F. B. Esq at the time of the judgment aforesaid given of being before our said Justices at Westm at that day to answer in Form aforesaid c. and that there are no other Tenants of the lands and Tenements which were of the said F. B. in his Bayliwick to whom he could make knowne and the same F. B. and R. at the same 15. Pas in our said Court appearing said that the same E. Execution against the said F. B. of the Mannor aforesaid with the appurtenances and against the same Richard of the Rectory aforesaid with the appurtenances ought not to have because they say that before the writ of Scire sac to the sheriff of Suff. directed to wit such a day and yeare one Thomas B Gent. was Tenant as of his Free Tenement of the mannor of E otherwise E. Court with the appurtenances in the County aforesaid of which said mannor with the appurtenances the same Francis Burnall at the same 15. Martin An. 42. abovesaid which day the judgment aforesaid was given was seised in his
demesnes of Fee which said mannor of E. otherwise E. Court with the appurt is chargeable with the execution of the judgment aforesaid together with the mannor and Rectory aforesaid and this they were ready to verifie whereupon for that aswell the said Mannor of E. otherwise E. Court as the said Mannor of P. with the appurtenances whereof the same Francis Bruster was returmed Tenant and the Rectory aforesaid with the appurtenances whereof the said R L. was retorned Tenant are chargeable with the payment of the debt Damages aforesaid the same Francis Brewster and Rob. London pray judgment and that they may not further answer to the said Writ of Si. facias against them in Forme aforesaid brought before the said Tho. Br. by our proces of Scire Facias be premonished to shew wherfore execution upon that Mannor together with the mannor and Rectory aforesaid ought not to be don And therefore we command you that by honest and lawfull men of your Bayliwick you make knowne to the said Thomas Bunell Tenant of the said Mannor of E. alias E. Court and to all Tenants of the lands and Tenements which were of the said Francis B. in Fee simple in your county of the same 15. S. Martin An. 42. abovesaid that they be before our Justices at Westminster 8. S. Hill to shew if any thing c. Wherefore the Debt and Damages aforesaid of the same Mannor of E. al E. Court or of any lands and Tenements which were of the same Francis at the time of the Judgment aforesaid given or at any time afterwards together with the same mannor of P. and the Rectory aforesaid ought not to be made according to the Form of the recovery aforesaid if to them it would seeme expedient and have you here the names of them by whome you shall make it knowne to them and this Writ Teste H Hobert at Westminster the 6. day of November An. 20. et Sco. 46. Retorn BY vertue of that Writ to me directed by I. W. and E. W honest and lawfull men of my bayliwick I have made knowne to the within named Thomas Burnall Tenant of the Mannor of E alias E. court with the appurtenances and that there are no other Tenants of other lands or Tenements in my County to whom I can make knowne A. B. Sheriff T 21. Ja. Hitcham the Kings Serjeant brought a certificat out of the Kings Bench into the Common Bench that if the defendant in any Action wherein Bayle is given die before a non invent be retorned against the Defendant upon a Scire fac the bayle is discharged and this was shewed in the case of Sparrow of Lowgate which is entred P. 19. Jac. Rot. 973. this is the true number Role in Banco Regis P 12. Jac. Co. Banco S. against S. Debt against the baile upon a Rerog in the Kings Bench the Defendants plead that the Pl. died before any Cap. was awarded against them a generall demurrer and judgment with the defendants after much debate H. 4. Jac. Rot. 975. in the Kings Bench D. against C. and W. against L. Seisin H 21. I. rot 2988. Brownlow Oxon ss Entry e fa writ of Habere facias sesinam in dower and the retorne thereof P 3 6 Eliz rot 1559. the like form of entry in dower It was commanded the sheriff whereas Briget Countis of Barkes widow who was the wife of Francis late Earle of Barkes lately in the court of the Lord the King now here to wit at Westminster by the consideration of the same court and recovered her seisin against Fr. R. otherwise N. of the third part of the hundred of Do. with the appur of the M. of D W. upon the greene with the appurtenances and of 200. Messuages 2. Mils 3. Dovehouses c. with the appurtenances in D and W. and also the third part of the Rectory of Weston upon the green and the Advowson of the Vicaridg of VVeston upon the green with the appurtenances as her Dower of the indowment of the said late Earle her late husbend by writ of the said Lord the King de dote unde nichil habet for default of the same Francis R. otherwise N. that to the same Countesse full seisin of the third part aforesaid with the appurtenances to hold to her in severalty by meets and bounds without delay he should causeâ— to be had and asmuch Tert. pars hundri mannors tenements Rectory and Advowson c. the sheriff should make to appreare here at this day to wit in Cr. Pur. beat Mariae c. and now here at this day came the same Countesse by Rob. Tomblinson her attorney and the sheriff to wit William C. Knight now doth return that he by vertue of the the writ aforesaid to him directed the 15. day of December last past caused to be had to the said Countesse full seisin of the third part of the hundred Mannors Tenements Copyheld land Rectory and Advouson aforesaid with the appurtenances to wit of 11. Messuages 3 Dove-houses 700. acres of land 300. acres of Meadow and 400. acres of pasture with the appurtenances in Dorchester and Drayton being Costomary lands of the mannor of Dorchester and parcell of the said Mannor then in the severall Tenures or occupations of I. p. Gent. E. H. Gent. c. or of their assignes with all lands Tenements cottages Meadowes Pastures Commons Rents Services and Hereditaments whatsoever to the same belonging or appertaining and of the Cheife Rent of twenty shillings and eleven pence issuing out of the Farme of Draycot aforesaid and the lands and Tenements to the sayd Farme belonging and appertaining and also the third part of the profits of the Mannor Court of Dorchester aforesaid The third part of the profits our manerii and of nine Messuages foure Cottages c. with the Appurtenances in Weston upon the green being customary Lands of the Mannor of Weston aforesaid and parcell of the said Mannor then in the severall Tenures or Occupations of I.G.W. H. c. or of their Assignes with all Lands Tenements Cottages Meadowes Pastures Commons Rents Services and Hereditaments whatsoever to the same belonging or appertaining 2 Mills and of all those new buildings called the Brew-house and of one Barne c. And also of two Water mills with the appurtenances in Weston aforesaid and all Tythes yearely growing and renewing Tythes as well out of the same Lands and Tenements in Weston aforesaid in the severall Tenures and occupations of the said I. A. W. H. c. or their Assigns as out of all singular other the Lands and Tenements whatsoever above named and to the Rectory of Weston aforesaid belonging or appertaining Rectory or being parcell of the sayd Rectory of Weston aforesaid and of the West part of the Wood or Copice called Weston wood in Weston aforesaid containing by estimation fourteen acres and of the Tithes from and out of the West part of the same Wood
London It was commanded the sheriffs whereas I. N. late of c. lately in the Court of the Lord Edward late King of England the 6 Venire fac to account against Tenant in Elegit and judgment against the Tenant and reliberate awarded before the Justices of the same late King of the Common bench here by the consideration of the same Court recovered against T. D. c. aswell a certaine debt of 400 l. as 6 l. which to the same I. in the same Court of the said late King were adjudged for his damages which he had by occasion of detayning of that debt whereof he is convicted And the same I. afterwards to wit the 28. day of N. An. Reg. nunc primo comming into the Court of the said Lady the Qu. now before the Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the bench here to wit P 2 3 P. M â—ry rot 926. or 126. Dyer fol 1. Pl 6. 4 H 8. at Westminster close to be delivered to him c. to hold c. and prayeth a writ thereof to the then sheriff of the said County of War to be directed which was granted to him whereupon the Lady the Queen now by her writ commanded the then sheriff of War that all good c. to hold c. and how far he shall execute that precept he should make appeare to her Justices at Westminster 15. Hillarii and that then he should have there that writ at which said 15. Hillarii R. T. Knight then sheriff of the said County of Warr. to the said Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Common Bench here to wit at Westminster retorned that he had done execution upon the lands and Tenements which were of the the same T. the same day of the judgment aforesaid thereon given And that a moyety thereof to wit one Parke c. which amounted by the yeare in all issues besides reprizes to 62 l. the 13. day of I. An. abovesaid and delivered them to the said I. N. according to the value and extent aforesaid to hold as his Tenement to him and his assignes untill the 300 l. See the old Tenures fol 123 E according to thi writ of Ven fac for the debt and damages aforesaid be thereof levied and further the said sheriff to the said justices of the said Lady the Queen here to wit at Westminster aforesaid retorned that 105 l. in ready moneys which were of the said T. the same day of the judgment aforesaid therein given he likewise delivered to the same I. to hold to him the goods and Cattle aforesaid as his owne goods and Chattles for the residue of the said 105 l for the Debt and Damages aforesaid And because the King and Queene now by the information of the said T. B. know Suggestion that the Pla. had levied a 100 l. above the debt and damages in cutting downe woods See Fâ— tit Scire Fac. Pl. 101. P. 32. E. 3. that although the said moyety of the said Lands and Tenements of the same T. B. so delivered to the said I. M. did only extend unto 62 l. notwithstanding the said I. N. aswell of the issues and profits of the moyety aforesaid whose true value doth extend it selfe to a greater value then the extent aforesaid as also of the woods and under-woods growing upon the same moyety by the same I. N. lately cut downe and solde 150 l. above the said 406 l. for the Debt and Damages aforesaid hath now levied whereupon he supplicates the King to be by the King and Queen provided of a fit remedy A Venire fac awarded ad Computandum de Exit deterie bosci And the said King and Queen willing to do what should be just to the said T. in that behalfe commanded the sheriffs of London to cause to come here 15. Pas the said I. N. to account with the same B. of the moneys received aswell out of the issues and profits of the moyety aforesaid according to the true value of the same from the time of the delivery aforesaid as of the woods and under-woods of late growing upon the said Moyety by the same I. N. cut downe and sold And further to shew if any thing c. wherefore the said moyety delivered before to the said I. N ought not to be delivered to the same T.B. if c. Non inventu returned Testat cap. awarded to the sheriff of Mid. ad compuandum quaere de hoc The parties come by attornies Vic. retorneth a Sup. At which said 15. Pas came the said T. B. by F. M. his attorney And the sheriffs to wit T. and I. now retorned that the said I. is not found c. And hereupon it is testified in the Court of the King and Qu. here that the said I.N. doth hide and run from place to place in the county of Midd. Therefore it is commanded to the sheriff of the said County of Midd. that he take the same I. N. if c. and safely c. so that he may have his body here tres Trin. to accout and shew in Form aforesaid c. And now here at the said tres Trin. came aswel the said T. B. by his attorney aforesaid as the said I. N. by F. M. his attorney and the sheriff of Midd. to wit T. and F. now retorned that after the receipt of the said writ of Capias I. N. delivered to the said sheriff a Writ of the Lord the King and the Lady the Queen of Sup. by which Writ the same sheriff as to the taking of the same I. N. could not proceed And hereupon the same T. B. saith that after 15. Hillarii An. Regin 1. Count upon the venire facias aswell of the issues and profits of the moyety aforesaid whereof the true value did amount to a great summe of money to wit 62 l. by the yeare above the extent aforesaid as also for the wood to wit Registred judiciale fo 14. such a writ against tenant by Elegie of 1200 Oakes and 340. Beech Trees and under-woods to wit C. cart loade of underwood to the value of 200 l. late growing in the said Moyety late cut down and sold by the same I. N. Cl. above the said 206 l. levied thereof for Debt and Damnges aforesaid whereupon he prayeth judgment and that the said I. N. may account with the said T. B. c. and also prayeth delivery of the Tenements aforesaid to the said T. B. to be done c. Nil dic ANd the said I. N. defends the force and wrong when c. And nothing in bar of the action of the said T. B. aforesaid wherefore the said I. of the moneys received of the premisses aforesaid to account with the same T. nor wherefore the said moyety to the same I. N. before delivered ought not to be redelivered to the same T. saith neither sheweth whereby the same B. Iudgment that he should account and
said I. H. whom c. to answer the said John Martin in the said plea c. T. 13. Jac. Rot. 3627. c. Brownlow the like is entred upon an Attachment of Priviledge for a Judges Clerk of the Common Bench with an Amerciament and awarding of an Hab. Corp. M. 10. Jac Rot. 1920. Norf Amerciament of a Bayly of a liberty upon a Cepi corpus returned and a Distringas awarded upon an attachment of priviledge M 19. Jac. rot 1948. M. 21. H. 8. rot 529 11 H. 4. fol. 43. pl. 12 ss It was commanded the Sheriff that he should attach I.G. so that he should have him here at this day to wit upon Fryday next after Mens pas to answer H.S. Gent. one of the Attorneys c. as in others in a plea of debt And now here at this day came the said Henry in his own person and he came not And the Sheriff to wit T.C. Esquire now returneth that he by vertue of the Writ aforesaid to him directed commanded Hen Hobart Knight and Baronet Attorney-generall of the Lord the King and Bayliff of the liberty of the said Lord the King of his Dutchy of Lanc. in the County aforesaid who hath the fall execution of all Writs within the liberty aforesaid and the returns of them within which execution of that Writ wholly vesteth to be made for that no other execution in any other place out of the said liberty can be made by the Sheriff which said Bayliff answered to the said Sheriff that he had taken the body of the said I. whose body he had ready before the Justices here at this day And because the said Bayliff hath not the body of the said I. ready here at this day Therefore the said Bayliff in mercy And is fined by the Justices here at forty shillings Therefore the Sheriff is commanded that be distrain the said Bayliff by all his lands c. and of the Issues c. so that he have here upon Fryday next after Cr. Trin. the body of the said I. whom c. to answer to the said H in the plea aforesaid c. See Trin 14. Jac Rot 2151. c. Brownlow a Distringas awarded after a Cepi Corpus returned by the Sheriff upon a Mand. Bal. against the chief Steward of the liberty of Bury Duces tecum awarded the Sheriffretu ned a Languidus in prisona upon an attachment for contempt M. 2. Car. Reg. Rot. 843. c. Brownlow War ss It is commanded the Sheriff as at another time it had been commanded to the said Sheriff that he should attach I.B. of c. if c. and safely c. so that he should have his body here at this day to wit upon Satturday next after fifteen Trin. to answer to the said Lord the King now of such things as at that day should be here objected against him And further to do and receive what the Court of the said Lord the King here should consider of him in this behalf And now here at this day came here into Court Robert Heath Knight Attorney-generall of the Lord the King now who for the same Lord the King in this behalf followeth And the same John being solemnly called came not And the Sheriff to wit Io. N. Esquire now returneth that by vertue of the said Writ to him directed he took the body of the said I. B. whose said body was so languishing in the Prison of the Lord the King in the County of War and held with divers infirmities so that he could not have his body ready here at this day as by the said Writ to him it was commanded c. And hereupon in the said Court of the Lord the King here on the behalf of the said Lord the King it was testified that the said Iohn is whole and sound and able to labour Therefore it is commanded to the said Sheriff that he or his under Sheriff be here upon Thursday next after Cr. Martini bring here with him the said Jo. whether he be unsound or infirm Sâ—e the old book of Entries fol. 41. title Annuity in proces 7. See T. 2. Car. Reg rot 2681. c. Gulston Vpon an appearance to an attachment upon contempt and thereupon examined submits himself to a fine to answer the said Lord the King now of and upon the premisses aforesaid in form aforesaid And this he by no means omit under the penalty of ten pounds which the Sheriff shall know himself to loose if he shall not do it H. 10. Eliz. Rot. 549. Buk ss It was commanded the Sheriff that he should not omit for any liberty of the County aforesaid but that he should attach J. R so that he should have his body here at this day to wit upon Thursday next after Cr. Pas that same term to answer to the Lady the Queen of and upon such things which then here on the behalf of the Lady the Queen should be objected And now here at this day that same Tearm came the said J. in his proper person by the Sheriff of the County aforesaid by vertue of the Writ aforesaid to him directed brought here to the Bar whereupon the Court here is given to understand that the same J.R. present here in Court that same Term in the face of the same Court behaved and carried himself evilly and unjustly in giving evidence to twelve Jurors of the same County of Buk to try a certain Issue of the Country between certain G.G. and A. his wise Plaintiffs and certain W.H. late of and J.L. late of c. in a plea of Trespasse in the same Court here joyned And prayeth that the same J. R. may be fined to the said Lady the Queen for that occasion whereupon the same J.R. being asked by the Justices here if he had or knew any thing to say for himself wherefore he ought not to be admitted to make a Fine with the Lady the Queen therein who saith that he will put himself upon the favour of the Court to do what the same Justices here should consider of him in that behalf And hereupon the same I. R. is admitted to make his Fine with the Lady the Queen by the occasion of the premisses at forty shillings to be paid here in Court into the hands of R.L. one of the Prothonotaries of the Court of the Lady the Queen here for divers Statute-books in the Treasury-house of this Court remaining bought Therefore the same I. go thereof without day c. Ballivo amovendo P 10 H. 6 Rot. 324. Be it remembred that Thomas May Entry of a Writ De ballivo amovend to remove a Bayliff for continuing in office above one year togeher against the form of the statute the third day of June that same Tearm delivered here to J.H. under Sheriff of Kent two Writs of the Lord the King closed directed to the Sheriff of Kent in form of Law to be executed which said Writs the same Sheriffs here in Court opened whose Tenors severally
the premisses And further to do and receive what our Court shall consider of in this behalf then you cause the same Francis to be delivered out of prison upon such baile to prosecute his Attaint aforesaid witnesse our selfe at Westminster the ninth day of November Anno 2. And hereupon here came R. G. Knight and A K Esquire in their proper persons and undertook for the same Francis that he here at the Term in the sayd Writ of Attaint contained and so from day to day at every day of the plea therein untill judgment be given therein should appear and that the same F K. should prosecute his Writ with effect and if it shal happen judgment against him to be given in this behalfe that hee shall render himselfe to the prison of the Lady the Queen of the Fleet there for the occasion aforesayd to stay untill c. to wit each of them under the penalty of 200 l. which each of them acknowledgeth to be levyed of their Lands and Chattles to the use of the said C. If it shall happen the sayd Fr. K. not to prosecute her writ aforesayd with effect or at any day of the Plea aforesaid therein to make default or that judgment therein be given against him shall not render himselfe to the Prison of the Fleet in the same untill hee shall have satisfied the same C. for his damages aforesaid to abide c. And in the meane time the said Fr. is dismissed from the custody aforesaid by bayle aforesaid And also the sayd Ro. and Ant. undertook to wit each of them in 200 l. for the same Fr. that the same Fr. shall render himselfe to the Prison of the Lady the Queen of the Fleet and satisfie the said Lady the Queen of that which belongeth to her if the Attaint aforesaid shall passe against the said Francis Dismissed upon baile or that the same Francis shall not prosecute his writ aforesaid therein And further that the same Francis shall do and receive what the Court of the said Lady the Queen shall consider in their behalfe which said 200 l. both of the Manucaptors aforesaid acknowledged to be levied of their Lands and Chattles aforesaid to the use of the said Ric. If it shall happen the said Fr. K. in any of the premisses to be don do make default towards the Lady the Queen And in the meane time the same Fr. is dismissed from the custody aforesaid by the bayle aforesaid c. Afterwards to wit the 11. day of February then next following came here in to the Court the same Christopher in his proper person and acknowledgeth that he is satisfied of the same 200 l. above to him acknowledged therefore the same Ro. O. and Ant. K. of the said 200 l. to the same C. in forme aforesaid acknowledged are quiet Satisfaction c. Commitment P 23 H. 7. rot 284. James Hobert who followeth for the Lady the Queene came here in Court the 10. Speciall commitment for levying of a Fine in the name of another person which had first refused to a knowled day of May An. 13. Reg. nunc and gave the court here to understand that whereas R. T. others the 4. day of Ianuary An. Regni R. nunc 13. out of the court of Chancery of the Lord the King here to wit at Westminster had prosecuted 4. severall Writs of the said King against Miles Harconet Esq and Ann his wife to the Sheriffe of the county of Oxon. Leci Sussex and Surr. severally directed by which said writs so directed to the Sheriffs aforesaid the King commanded that justly c. they should hold to the said I. T. and R. covenants between them made of the Mannor of E in the county of G. and of the Mannor of D. in the county of Leic. And of the Mannor of P in the county of Sussex and of the Mannor of D. in the county of Surr. whereupon the said Miles and Ann. the third day of February Ao 13. abovesaid before Io. Vavasor one of the Justices of the Lord the King of the Bench the said I. U. then having power to receive the acknowledgment of such Fine between the said Miles and Ann and the same Ro. Io and T. of the Mannors and Tenements aforesayd with the appurtenancus at Shorditch in the county of Midd. the same Miles being examined made his acknowledgment there and the same Ann to make any acknowledgment in the premisses that any Fine from thence afterwards might be levied upon her acknowledgment then and there altogether refused and denyed And afterwards the said Miles and Iohn Mill of London Gent indevouring the sayd Ann malitiously to hurt disinherit and defraud falsely and fradulently stirred up and councelled a strange woman to assert and affirme that she was the wise of the said Miles and shee under the name of the said Ann Wife of the said Miles acknowledged upon the Writs aforesaid that a Fine upon her acknowledgment and the acknowledgment of the said M. as afore is sayd taken and recorded might be made and levied By pretext of which said counsell and exitation to the said Io. Mill the sayd strange Woman under the name of Ann the wife of the sayd Miles afterwards to wit the 8. day of February before the said Io. Vava c. at Bedlam in the Parish c. at the instance and request of the sayd Miles and Io. Mill came in their owne persons And then and there the said strange woman falsly deceitfully and maliciously under the name of Ann wife of the said Miles acknowledged the Mannor and Tenement aforesaid as in the concord with warranty of Miles and his heires against all men to the disinheritance of the sayd Ann and her heires in contempt of the Lord the King now and pernitious example of his Leige People the said Iohn Vavasor then perceiving she the sayd woman not to be the wife of the said M And prayeth that the say Miles Io M. and the said strange woman may be punished to the example of others And prayeth processe may be made against them to be directed to the Sheriff of Midd. to Attach them to answer the said Lord the King of and upon the Premisses And of and upon such things which on the behalfe of the sayd Lord the King shall be then and there objected against them and it is granted to her retornable here upon Wednesday next following At which day here came the said Iohn Mill in his proper person by vertue of the Writ aforesaid taken and brought to the bar And thereupon the sayd Iohn Mill is committed to the Prison of the Lord the King of the Fleet by occasion of the premisses there to stay untill c. M 9. H. 7. rot 295. Attachment was awarded against Pecock to do and receive c. A Commitment for sorging of writ counterfeiting of the Seale and at a day the said I. P. was by the Sheriff brought to the barr
aforesaid or any parcell thereof he could cause to be made Therefore it is commanded to the Reverend Father in Christ John by Divine Providence Bishop of Norwich and Ordinary of that place that of the goods Ecclesiasticall of the sayd Edward within his Diocesse he cause to be made the Debt and Damages aforesayd and that he have those monyes here in Octob. S. Mich. to render to the sayd T. for his debt and damages aforesaid c. Entry of a Writ of fieri facias de bonis testatoris the Sheriff returned that the parcell of the debt is leviâ—d De bonis testat and as to the residue that the Executor had wasted c. and that he had made the damages De bonis propriis and execution awarded De bonis propriis for the goods wasted PAsch 12. Jac. rot 2167 Norff ss It was commanded the Sheriff that of the goods and chattells which were of I. B. late called I. B. of W. in the County of N. Yeoman in the hands of Joan B. of F. in the County aforesaid Widow Executrix of the Testament of the same John in your Bailiwick he should cause to be made as well a certain debt of an hundred pounds which F D. in the Court of the King here to wit at Westminster recovered against him as two pound six shillings eight pence which to the same F. in the same Court of the King here were adjudged for his Damages which he had by occasion of detaining of that Debt if the same Joan had so much Goods and Chattells which were of the sayd John at the time of his Death in her hands to be administred and if she had not then the damages aforesaid of the proper goods and chattells of the same Ioan to be levied and that he should have those monyes here at this day to wit 15 Pasch to render to the same F. for his debt and Damages aforesaid whereof he is convicted And now here at this day came the same Francis B. by S. L. his Attorney and the Sheriff to wit Iames Calthrop Knight now returneth that after the death of the same I. B. and before the coming of the said Writ the goods and chattells which were of the said J at the time of his death to the value of fifty eight pounds four shillings and two pence came to the hands of the same Joan after the death of the same I. B. to be administred of wh ch sayd goods and chattells twenty seven pounds eight shillings and two pence of the debt aforesaid he caused to be made according to the Exigency of the same Writ Devasta vit and that the same Joane before the coming of the sayd Writ wasted the residue of the goods and chattells aforesaid and converted to her own use so that the residue of the sayd Debt or Damages aforesaid of the same goods or chattells he could not cause to be made but that of the proper goods and chattells of the same Joane by vertue of the Writ aforesaid he cause to be made the Damages aforesaid and those monies together with the twenty seven pounds eight shillings and two pence of the goods and chattells of the sayd John as aforesaid levied before the Justices here at this day to render to the same Francis according to the Exigency of that Writ he had ready T. 14. H. 6. rot 318. A Devastavit returned and thereupon an Elegit is awarded as by the same Writ to him it was commanded c. Therefore it is considered that the same Francis have Execution against the same Joan for the residue of the said fifty eight pounds four shillings two pence by the same Joan as aforesaid wasted of the proper goods and chattells of the same Joan c. H 19 H 6 rot 134 Brownlow London ss An entry of a speciall fi fac de bonis testatoris H. 9. H. 6. fol. 87. pl. 2. Fitz. Executors pl. 7. this Writ awarded and by the Court The judgment in this case was entred T. 8 H 6 rot 102 See the old book of entries fol 326 title Execution against Executoâ—s pl. 8 scire facias brought against two Administrators after a Devastavit to have Execution De terris catallis propriâ—s P 9 H 6 fol 9 Fitz Executors 9 M 11 H 6 fol 8 pl. 12. An Action of Debt brought against the administrators and suggests that hee had wasted the goods c. 3 H 6 fol 148 P 11 H 6 fol 351. 12 E 3 Fitz Executors pl 73 and pl 85. Old Book of Entries fol 326 title Execution against Executors pl. 8. See Fitz return De viscount pl. 9 H. 6 H 9 fol 57 that such a return is not good M 5 Car rot 874 the like for Rivers against the Sheriff of Castle maine It was commanded the Sheriffs that of the goods and chattells which were of R. S. late Citizen and Cloth worker of London being in your Bailiwick in the hands of John Leweter of London Gent. R. B. of London Draper B. H. of London Draper and Allice who was the wife of R S. late Citizen and Clothier of London Administrators of the goods and chattells which were of R. S. late Citizen and Clothier of London who dyed Intestate c. yet should cause to be made forty pounds which William Andrewes Citizen and Poulterer of London in the Court of the King here recovered against the said Administrators of the goods of the said Richard being in the hands of the said Administrators to be levied and of the proper Lands and Chattells of the said Administrators nine markes which to the said William in the same Court of the King here were adjudged for his Damages which he had by occasion of the detaining of that Debt and that they should have them here at this day to wit in 8. S. Hil. to answer to the said William of his Debt and Damages aforesaid whereof they are convicted And now cometh the said William by W. B. his attorney and the sheriffs now returne that from the coming of the writ aforesaid untill the day of the retorn of the same no goods or chattles which were of the said R. S. at the time of his death in their Bayliwick in the hands of the said Administrators were or are whereof the said 40 l. or any monies thereof they could cause to be made as by lawfull waies and meanes which they knew or better thereof could know to them at the present can appeare to be made Notwithstanding they have made of the proper Lands and Chattles of the said Administrators the 9. Marks aforesaid which they have ready here at this day which said nine Marks are delivered to the said W. Therefore aswell the said sheriffs as the said administrators are thereof quiet And because the retorne aforesaid as to the said 40 l. is reputed insufficient and conceived to be made in delay of the execution of the recovery aforesaid And in the Kings Court here on
the Court here made that the same Iohn who otherwise to wit the second day of August Ano. 3. R. nunc before Iames Story Lon. and Robert Cotton Esquires by vertue of a certaine writ of the Lord the King de Dedmi Potestatem to them and certaine Thomas Hutchison and Robert Smith Esquries directed to give power to three or two of them to take the acknowledgment which the same Iohn before the said I. S. K. C. T. H. and R. S. three or two of them would make upon which said writ of covenant depending before the Justices of the said Lord the King of the Common Bench between certain Tho. Fortesceu Esq and Io. Slany and the same Io. Zouch of the Mannor of Alfreton ali Awfreton with the appurt and of 120. Mes 100. Cottages 500 tofts 4 Mils c. with the appurt in A. otherwse A.S. otherwise S. S. otherwise S. c. And also of the profits of the markets and Faires and Toll in A. otherwise A. in the same County of Derb. acknowledged the Mannor Tenements Rents and Profits aforesaid to be the right of the same Thom. and the same remised and quit claimed from him and his heires to the same Thomas and Iohn Slany and the Heires of the same Thomas for ever at the time of that acknowledgment upon thâ— writ aforesaid was and yet is within the age of one and twenty years Therefore it is considered by the court here _____ of May that same Terme that the acknowledgment aforesaid by the same Io. Zouche before I. S. and Rob. Cotton made is void and of no Force in Law and that as well the said Writ of Covenant as the said writ of Dedimus Potestatem are quashed and adnulled and in the Files of the writs of this Court are not to be received or Filed nor that any record be made thereof in the court here Brev. de Gardiano admittendo H 10. J. Rot. 2002. Brownlow ss Entry of a Writ De gardiano admittend in a Writ of Partition M 22 Jac Rot 554. the like in debt T 33 Eliz Ro 1556. like in Dower Int. S. G. The King sent to the Justices here his Writ closed in these words James by the grace of God of England c. To his Justices of the Bench Greeting Know ye that we have admitted Nicholas S. Gent. the Gardian of Mary B. and Grace B. Daughters and heires of Richard Barret Esq being within age as is said to prosecute and defend the Sute which is before us by our Wirt between the same Rich. Barret and one Ralph Raulin in a Plea of making partition as is said And therefore we command you that you admit the same in Gardian of the same M. and G. to prosecute and defend the Plaint aforesaid Witnesse our selves at Westminster the 19. day of May An. 10. and 45. Habeas Corpus ss IT was commanded the sheriff as more times it was commanded to the same Sheriff that he should have here at the third day Entry of a Hab. corâ— in a plea of debt and the Sheriff returneth that he was not taken nor ever in his custody And a Writ awarded de distring nup vic to wit ter die the body of E. T. c. whom by precept of the Lord the King he took and him detayneth and the same sheriff to the Justices here ter die last past retorned to answer T. S. in a plea that he render unto him 20 l. which he oweth and unjustly detayneth c. And now here at this day came the said T. by T.C. his Attorney and the sheriffe retorneth that the said E. was not taken by the said sheriff by vertue of any writ either is or ever was in the custody of the said sheriff either by I. N. Knight his Predecessor by indenture between him the late sheriff or the said sheriff to the sheriff now was over delivered And therefore the body of the said E. before the Justices here at this day he could not have Distring nup vic Therefore it is commanded to the sheriff now that he distrain the said late sheriff by all his lands c. and that of the issues c. so that he may have here 15. Martini the body of the said E. whome to answer to the said T. in the Plea aforesaid c. Entry of a Writ of Hab corp upon priviledge wi h the recognizance H 12. Iac. Rot. 2271. It was commanded the Mayor Aldermen and sheriffs of London and every of them whereas it was shewed to the Lord the King now on the behalf of Peter Furb that whereas he and every leige man of the Lord the King in coming to the Court of the said Lord the King of common Bench here to wit at Westminster to prosecute or defend any plea or writ there ought to be under the protection of the said Lord the King and customs according to the Liberties and Privileges of the same Court from the time whereof the memory of man is not extant used and approved in the same Cause of priviledges Notwithstanding some malevolent indevouring much to prejudice the same Peter the same Pet. after he came to the Court here to consult with his Councell and attorny to have their advice in a certaine plea of debt upon demand of 30 l. prosecuted by the same P. in the said Court of the Lord the King against one James Robinson wherupon the parties aforesaid pleaded to issue of the Country to be tryed in London to be arrested by the ministers of the said Mayor Aldermen and Sheriffs and in the Prison of the Lord the King under the custody of the said Mayor Aldermen and Sheriffs procured to be detained unjustly to the imoderate dammage and grievance of the said Peter and against the liberties and Privileges aforesaid whereupon he supplicated to the Lord the King to exhibet to him a remedy the said Lord the King willing to do to the same P. in that behalf which was just and consonant to reason and inviolably to observe the liberties and privileges aforesaid That if the same Peter should be detayned in the prison aforesaid under the custody aforesaid Then the same Peter by whatsoever name reputed together with the day and cause of his taking and detaining they should have or one of them should have before H. Hobert Knight and Baronet Cheife Justice of the said Lord the King of the common bench at his chamber Scituate in Lincolns Inn in the county of Midd. immediately after the receit of the said Writ Hab corp rem immediatly before the Chief that the same cheife Justice of the Lord the King seeing the cause aforesaid should do in that behalf what of right and according to the law and custome of the Lord the King of England and the liberties and privileges aforesaid should be don and that they should have then there that writ Afterwards to wit the 24. J that same Terme the chief Justice delivered here in
Court with his owne hands the writ aforesaid directed to the said Mayor Aldermen sheriffs in Forme aforesaid The writ delivered in Cou t. The party comes in his proper person Returne de causes And before the said chief Justice by the same Mayor Aldermen and sheriffs the 10th day of Jan. last past retorned and executed and the same cheif Justice hath certified here in court that then and there before the said Châ—ife Justice at his chamber aforesaid came the said P. in his proper person under the custody of the said sheriffs and Martin L. and P. P. Sheriffs of the City aforesaid now retorne that before the coming of the said writ the 15th day of Dec. An. R. c. 12. The same Peter was taken in the City aforesaid and detained in the prison of the said Lord the King under the custody of the said Sheriffs by vertue of a complaint levied against him the same day and year in the Court of the Lord the King held before the same M. L. by the name of Peter Furbusher Gent. at the suit of H. R. in a plea of Trespasse 1 Cause in a plea of Trespass Damages 40 l. to the Damages of forty pounds the said Peter was also detained by vertue of a complaint against him 20 Ja. praed levaet in the Court of the sayd Lord the King held before the said Martin Limny by the name of P. F. at the suit of Alexander Ratcliffe in a plea of Debt upon demand of sixty pounds 2 Cause in debt for 60 l. and so recite all the causes whereof the partyes aforesayd have pleaded and so depend undetermined and that these were the causes of taking and detaining of the sayd Peter in the prison aforesaid whose body they have ready as by the sayd Writ to them it is commanded c. whereupon the premisses being seen and by the said cheife Justice then and there fully examined and understood The party and She iffs are discharged it seemed to the said cheif Justice that the sayd P. ought then and there to enjoy the liberties and priviledges aforesaid whereupon the same Peter was then and there dismissed from the custody of the said Sheriffs by the said cheif Justice Vpona forraign Attachment accordingly 1 H 15 Elâ—â—t 588 and the same Sheriffs then and there were discharged by the same cheif Justice from his custody and hereupon the same P. and R. H. of Stepney c. and I.B. of the same Dyer undertook and every of them did undertake Mâ—ch 8 and 9 El. rot 329. Entry of a priviledge for diverse causes and the bail entred severally and there rot 1754. Recognizance to appear to Writs or Actions to be brought Note that in this case the Originall ought to be brought the next Terme ensuing but in a reversall the plaintiff hath liberty of two Termes to bring his Writ to wit the same P. in the summe of one hundred and twenty pounds and the same R. and I. severally in the summe of sixty pounds at the suit of Alexander Ratcliff and Sic de ceteris c. That the said P. should appear here in Court in his proper person or by his sufficient Attorney in Law and answer to the severall Actions or Writs of the same H.R. c. against the same P. of and upon the severall pleas aforesaid before 15 Pasch then next coming to be brought and prosecuted here in Court and also if it shall happen judgment after the apperance of the sayd P. here in Court made in the same pleas for the same H. and A. and against the said P to be given to satisfie the same H. c. of their Damages and the sayd Alexander of his Debt and Damages for the same H. c. and A. against the same Peter in the same Court here to be recovered or adjudged in the pleas aforesaid or that the same P. render himself to the prison of the Fleete of the Lord the King for those occasions which sayd severall summs by the said Manucaptors in forme aforesaid acknowledged the same Manucaptors acknowledge to be made of their Lands and Chattells and which sayd severall summs by the same P in form aforesaid acknowledged the sayd Peter acknowledgeth to be made of his Lands and Chattells and to be levied to the use and behoof of the sayd H. and A. in form aforesaid if it happen the same P. make Default in any of the premisses and in lawfull manner to be convinced thereof Brownlow T 41 Eliz. rot 1229. ss That the said R shall appear here in Court in his proper person or by his sufficient Attorney in Law to the Action or Writ of the said A against the said R. of and upon the cause aforesaid before such a day to be brought and prosecuted in Court here and to answer to the said A. in the plea aforesaid and also if it happen c. Entry of a priviledge returnable immediat in banck H 12 Jac. rot 2262. Brownlow As before in the president for P.F. untill or one of them should have before the Justices of the Lord the King here to wit at Westminster immediatly after the receit of the said Writ that the same Justices of the said Lord the King seeing the cause aforesaid c. untill the end of the Writ Afterwards to wit the ninth of February that same Terme came here into Court the same Michael in his own person under the custody of the Bailiff of the Marshall and Judges c. And recite the Return of the Writ whereupon the premisses being seene and by the Justices here fully examined and understood it seemeth to the said Justices here that the sayd M at present ought to enjoy the liberties and priviledges aforesaid and so as in the president before Alit T 14 Eliz. rot 1288. Divers causes returned wherein are diverse Complaints in Trespasse and debt and the Entry is that he shall appear in Court in his proper person or his sufficient Attorney in Law of and upon the severall Actions of and for the summs aforesaid against the same W. by the said T. M. and M. or any of them before 8 Michaelis next coming to be brought or prosecuted here in Court severally to the same T. M. and M. or either of them in the said Court here in the severall pleas aforesaid P. 28 Eliz. rot 328. the like against the said W. severally to be recovered or adjudged or that he the same W. render himselfe upon that occasion or occasions to the prison of the Fleet of the Lord the said King which sayd summ of fifty pounds to wit twenty pounds thereof the same T. ten pounds to the said M and O. to the sayd I. I. acknowledged every of them acknowledgeth severally to be made of their Lands and Chattells and to the use c. Speciall Amerciament of the Sheriff for not returning of a Writ of Habeas corpus in debt after
sheriff might have answered to the said Lord the King from the day of the receiving of the writ aforesaid untill the said day of the retorne thereof and the Inquisition which c The same Justices make appear here in S Mich. by their letters Sealed c. M 13. Jac. Rot. 2096. Brownlow Wiltes ss It was commandethe Justices of the Lord the King at the assize in the County aforesaid whereas the King had commanded the late sheriff of the county aforesaid as otherwise he had commanded him that he should distrain W. Dutton Knight late sheriff of the county aforesaid his predecessor by all his lands and chattles in his Bayliwick so that neither he nor any one for him put their hands upon them Entrey of a wâ—it to inquire de quantis exitiff c. See the statute Westmi 2.29 which granted this writ Hn. 13. E. 1. untill he shall have an other precept therein from the Lord the King and that he should answer of the issues of them to the said Lord the King so that he should have before the Justices of the said Lord the King there to wit at Westminster in Cr. S. Trinitatis last past the body of R. G. late of c. otherwise called R. G. c. which by the precept of the Lord the King he had lately taken as Fr. Popham Knight late sheriff of the county aforesaid predecessor of the sheriff now otherwise retorned to the Justices of the Lord the King here to wit at Westminster aforesaid to answer to W. Mariat of a plea that he should render unto him 30 l. which c. And to heare his judgment of more defaults c at which day the said now sheriff to the Justices of the said Lord the King now here to wit at Westminster aforesaid T. 18. Rot. 1674. retorneth that the said W. D. was distrained by his Chattells to the value of 66 s. and 8 d. where upon it was test fied in the Court of the King here on the behalf of the said W. M. that the said sheriff of greater issues to wit of 20 l. might have answered that by the oath of honest and lawfull men of the county aforesaid in the presence of the said now sheriff if he will be present they should diligently inquire of what and how many issues of the lands and chattels of the said W. D P. 12. H 6. Rot. 2 a ve fac awarded to the Coroneâ—s to inquire de quantis exitibus besides the said 66 s. 8 d. in his bayliwick the now sheriff could have answered to the Lord the King c. from the day of the receiving of the said Writ untill the same day of the returne of the same And the said Inquisition which c. the said Justices of assize should make appeare here at this day to wit in 8. S. Mich. by their letters sealed and now here at this day came the said W. M. by Tho. P his attorney and the said Justices of assize to wit Laurance Tanfeild Kni. Cheife Baron of the Lord the King of his Exchequer and Henry Mountague one of the Serjeants at law of the said Lord the King assigned to take the assize in the county afaresaid The Justices of assizes â—â—toâ—ne into the bench an â—â—quisition taken by them now retorne here a certaine Inquisition at new Salisbury in the county aforesaid the 19. day of I. last past by vertue of the said writ by the oath of 12. c. taken by which it is found that the said W. D. Kni. late sheriff of the county of the said Cr. S. Tri. last past and long before had divers lands and chattells in the county aforesaid whereof the said now sheriff to wit H. M. from the day of the receiving of the said writ of Distring above mentioned untill the retorne of the same of twenty pounds in issues besides the 66 s. and 8. d. above might have answered to the said Lord the King to wit at L. in the county aforesaid Therefore it is considered that the said H. L. for his concealement in this behalfe in gui Sit. Mia of the Lord the King And that he answer the Lord the King of the said 20 l. whereof he besides the said 66 s. 8 d. of the lands and chattells of the said W. D. as aforesaid could have answered according to the Form of the statute in this case provided c. statute 13. E. 1. Cap. 39. A Wâ—it to enquire of damages awarded de novo where the Sheriff returned that he could not execute the old Writ for that some of the Iurors refused to take their Oath and a Capias awarded against them for contempt Capias awardeâ— P 20. H. 8. Rot. 461. At which day here came the said Plaintiff by his attorney aforesaid and the sheriff to wit W P. Knight now retorneth that he such a day and yeare last past caused to come before him at L. in the County aforesaid A. B. C. D. and others to inquire of and upon the premisses which said C. D. their corporall oath of and upon the premisses to performe or swear altogether refused and denied in manifest contempt of the Lord the King now and the lawes of his Kingdome So that execution of the said Writ he could not then do Therefore as before the sheriff was commanded that by the oath of honest and lawfull men of the county aforesaid he diligently inquire what damages the said plaintiff sustained aswell by occasion of the entry aforesaid as for his costs c. and in as much c. he make appeare here such a day under the seale c. and Seales c. And also it is commanded to the said sheriff that he omit not for any liberty but that he take the said C. and D. if c. and safe c. so that they may have their bodies here at the said Terme to answer unto the Lord the King of the contempt aforesaid c. The same day is given to the said Plaintiff here c. Entry of a Writ of inquiry against an Attorney in Covenant LOndon ss Whereas Hugh Beeston Knight in our Court before our Justices at Westmin exhibited to our said Justices his certain bill against R. G. Gent. one of the attornies c. otherwise called R. G of Cliffords Inn London Gent. in a plea of covenant for that whereas the same Ricard by his certain Writing sealed with his seale and into our Court before our Justices brought made at London in the parish of St. Mary Bow in the ward of Cheape the 29. day of Nov. An. Dom. 1616. whose date is the same day and year acknowledged himself to have his custody two Fether beds 1. Bolster 4. Stooles covered with Scotish worke c. of the proper goods and chattles of the same Hugh Beeston which same Goods and Chattles after the delivery of them to the said Hugh were left in the custody of the said Richard And whereas
also the same Richard had promised and by his said writ covenanted to and with the said Hugh to redeliver the same goods and chattels to the same Hugh Beeston or his assignes within the space of one Moneth after warning thereof to the said Richard given as by the writing aforesaid fully appeareth And the same Hugh in Fact saith that he after the making of the writing aforesaid and before the day of exhibiting of the same bill to wit the 9 day of Feb. An. 16. c. at London in the parish and ward aforesaid requested the said Richard to deliver to the said Hugh the same goods and chattels within the space of one moneth then next following after the warning aforesaid in Form aforesaid given according to the Forme and effect of the writing aforesaid And so the same Richard although often requested the covenant aforesaid In that the same Richard should redeliver to the said Hugh the same goods and chattels within the space of one moneth after warning to him thereof given hath not held but broken and the same to him yet to hold gainesayd and yet gainsayeth wherupon he sayth that he is the worse and hath damage to the value of 30 l. In such sort it is proceeded in our said Court and that the said Hugh his damages by occasion of the breaking of the Covenants aforesaid in not delivery of the goods and chattles aforesaid to wit one Fether bed one long Table c. of the goods and chattells aforesaid against the same Richard ought to recover But because it is unknowne what damages the said Hugh hath sustained by occasion of the breaking of the covenant aforesaid in not delivering the goods and chattles aforesaid we command you that by the oath of honest c. you diligently inquire what damages the said Hugh sustayned aswell by occasion of the breaking of the covenant aforesaid in not delivering of those goods and chattells as for his costs and charges by him about his Suit in this behalfe laid out And the Inquisition c retornable upon Thursday next after the morrow of S. Martin under your Seales c. And the seales c. damages 8 l. charges 26 s. 8 d. increase 4 l. 7 s. 4 d. in whole 14 l No judgment was entered because the Parties agreed H 18. I. Rot. 568. Devon ss Entry of a Writ of Inquiry in case for sees for suing forth of a Writ of covenant Whereas Iohn Blachford was attached to be in our court before our Just ces at Westminster c. to answer Iohn Hore Gent. one of the attornies of the court of common Bench for that that whereas the said Io. here the 28. day of Sep. An. c. 12. was and alwaies hitherto is one of the attornies of the bench aforesaid and so being one of the attornies of the same Court the same Io. Blachford the said 28. day of Sept. An. 12 above said at Chagford in consideration that the same I. Hore at the speciall instance and request of the same I. Blachford would be the attorney of one Tho. Wise Knight and to prosecute for the same Tho. out of our court of Chancery a certaine writ of ours of covenant of and for levying of a Fine in our said Court of the common Bench between the said Tho. and certaine O. W. Esquire and Margaret his wife of certain lands with the appurtenances in W. and D. in the county aforesaid and a certaine other Writ of ours of Dedimus Potestatem to certaine F. F. Knight H. C. Gent. and I the same I. Hore to be directed to acknowledg the Caption which the same Oliver and Margaret before them or two of them should make of the same lands that a Fine thereupon might be had according to the course of Fines at the common Law of our Realm of England assumed upon himselfe and to the said Iohn Hore then and there faithfully promised that he the said Iohn Blachford all expences which the same Iohn Ho. in and about the prosecution of the Writs aforesaid the levying and ingrossing of the Fine aforesaid and other things which in that behalfe should be requisite and necessary to be don should expend and deposit And also 3 s. 4 d. for his attornies Fee For every Terme wherein the same John Hore should be the Attorney of the same Thomas Wise in and about the prosecution of the businesses aforesaid when thereof he should be required well and faithfully would pay and content And although the said John Hore giving credit to the promise and assumption of the said John Blachford afterwards to wit the 6. day of October An. 12. abovesaid the said Writ of Covenants of the lands aforesaid to wit of 1. messuage 1. Garden one orchard 200. acres of land c. with the appurtenances in W. and T. under the name of the said T. W. against the said F. Whi. and Margaret his wife before the Justices of the Bench in Oct. S. Hillar then next following retornable and retorned And the 7. day of the said month of Octo. the aforesaid other writs of Dedi Potestat of our said Court of Chancery to the same Fr. F. Kt. H. C. and to the same I. H. directed was likewise prosecuted and a Fine thereupon before our said Justices was in due manner had levied ingrossed And a Fine therupon according to the common Law of our Realm of Eng. was levied And all and singular other things which in that behalf were necessary and expedient to be don did and performed And was attorney for the said Thomas in that cause in the Term of S. Michael An. 12. abovesaid and in the Term of S. Hillary then next following and 6 s. 8 d. for his Attorneys Fee in the same Terms were due to the same I. Hore and the same John 78 s. 2 d. in and about the bringing and prosecution of the same Writs and levying and ingrossing of the said Fine and in doing all and singular other things which in that behalf were necessary and expedient to be done in and about the premisses laid out and deposited which said severall summes in the whole doe amount unto 84 s. and 10 d. neverthelesse the said I. B. his promises and assumption aforesaid not regarding but indeavouring and fradulently intending him the said J. Hore of the said 84 s. 10 d. craftily and subtilly to defraud the same 84 s. 10 d to the same I. H. according to his promise and assumption aforesaid hath not paid although to this by the same I. H. afterwards to wit the 20. day of March An. c. 14 s. at Chagford aforesaid was requested but the same to him heitherto to pay hath denyed yet denyeth c. In such sort it is proceeded c. damages 6 l. mi. 20 s increase 6 s. in whole 8 l. Liberari Facias P 4 Eliz. rot 1919. H 32 Eliz. rot 1606 Heref. ss Entry of a wâ—it of Liberari fac to the
together and undâ—videdly doe hold 20. Mes 6. mills 20. Gardens 2000. acres of land 500. acres of Meadow 1000. acres of Pasture 2000. acres of wood 2000 acres of Furs and heath and 500. acres of land covered with water with the appurtenances in Balcombe Tuck-feild Slewham Crawley and Porth the same Walter to make partition thereof between them according to the Forme of the statute in such case provided gainsayeth and unjustly permited not the same to be don and against the Form of the statute aforesaid And the same Walter in the Court of the King here well granteth that partition thereof be made by which it was considered in the same Court of the Lord the King here that partition should be made between the parties aforesaid of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances That taking with him 12. Free and lawfull men of the neighborhoods of B. C. S. C. and W. by whom c. he should come in his proper person unto the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances and in the presence of the parties aforesaid by the same Sheriffe to be premonished if they will be present the same Tenements with the appurtenance by the oath of honest and lawfull men of his county respect being had to the true value of the same Tenements with the appurtenances he should cause to be parted into two equall parts and one part of the sâ—me Tenements with the appurtenances to the same Edward and the other part of the same Tenements with the appurtenances residue to the same Walter to hold to them in severalty he should cause to be delivered and assigned so that neither the said Edward nor the same Walter may have more of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances then belongeth to them to have and that the said Edward of his purpart to the same Edward out of the tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances hapning And the same Walter of his purpart to the same Walter out of the tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances hapning may severally apportion themselves and that partition by the same sheriff distinctly and openly made he should make appeare here in Oct. S. Mich. under his seale and the seales of them upon whose oath that partition shall be made and that he should have here the names of them upon whose oath he should make that Inquisition and that writ And now here at this day came the same Edward by Robert Moyle his attorney and the sheriff to wit Nicholas Eversfeild Esq now retorneth here a Certaine partition between the parties aforesaid of the tenements aforesaid by the same sheriff before him by vertue of the writ aforesaid and according to the Form of the said writ by the oath of 12 c. made which followeth Sussex ss I. N. E. sheriff of the county aforesaid to the Justices of the Lord the King do certifie by vertue of a writ therein to me directed and to this schedule annexed the seventh day of August An. c. 18. See the new book of Entries title Partition fo 411. such a form took with mee I. F the elder I. F. the younger and ten others twelve Free and lawfull men of the Neighbourhoods of B. C. S. C. and W. in the same writ specified I came in my proper person to the tenements in the same writ specified to wit to 20 Mess 20. Gardens 2000. acres of Land 500 acres of Meadow 1000. acres of pasture 2000. acres of Wood 2000. acres of Furze and heath and 500. acres of Land covered with water in B. C. S. C. and W. in the same writ mentioned And there by their oath respect being had to the true value of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in the presence of the parties in the same writ named by me the same sheriff premonished the same Tenements into two equall parts with the appurtenances I have made to be parted and one part of the Tenements aforsaid with the appurtenaces to wit one Capitall Messuage or mansion house called T. with the appurtenances c. and so receite the parcells c. I have caused to be delivered and assigned to Edward Culpeper Knight in the same writ named for his purpart of the Tenements aforesaid to hold to the same Edward in severalty by himself as by meets and bounds they are now divided And an other part of the same Tenements with the appurtenances that is to say one Messuage called the glovers house otherwise Gardners farm c. And so receit the other particulars c. 2. Part. I have câ—used to be delivered and assigned to Walter Covert Knight in the same writ likewise named for his purpart of the Tenements aforesaid to hold to the same Walter in severalty by himself as by meets and bounds they are now divided so that the same Edward of his purpart of the same Edward out of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances hapâ—ing And the same Walter of his purpart to the same Walter out of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances in Form aforesaid hapning may severally apportion themselves as by the same writ it was commanded to me in Testimony whereof aswell I the same sheriff as the Jurors aforsaid to this partition have severally put our seales the day and yeare abovesaid Judgment that the paâ—tion be held fâ—â—m amd stable Therefore it is considered that the partition aforesaid be held Firm and Staple for ever Note that at the retorn of this writ of particion Hickham the Kings Serjeant at Law and of councell with the defen Sr. Walter Covert Knight came to the bar and moved that the partition might be quashed and that a new Writ to make partition might issue For that the partition was not Legally made by the sheriff And upon much debate in Court the 4 Judges Hobort Warborton Winch and Hutton ordered Sr. Walter Covert to pay to Sr. Edw. Colpeper 3500 l. for his part wherewith the parties are agreed and Sr. Walter Covert in joyed the lands aforesaid and the writ was not Filed nor the judgment entred but I added it to the partition because of the presedent Plur. Replegiare M 6. 7. Eliz. Rot. 423. Entry of a wrâ— of Plur. replegiare Otherwise as it appeareth in the time of the holy Trinity An. 6. Regin nunc Rot. 621 It is thus contayned Derb ss It was commanded the sheriff that whereas of late the Qu. had more times commanded the said sheriff that instantly and without delay he should make replevy to M. S. widow a certaine oxe which E. T. and W. T. took and unjustly detayned c. Or the sheriff of the County aforesaid should be before the Justices of the said Lady the Queen here to wit at VVestminster in Oct. S. Mich. An. 4 Reg. nunc to shew wherefore he contemned to execute the command of the Lady the Queen so often to him therein directed And the same sheriff to the Justices of the said Lady the Queen here at the day of the retorne that
of the said T. Lacke was servant of the said Iohn Rooper Knight Cheif Clarke of the said Lady the Queen now assigned to enroll the pleas of the said Lady the Queen before the same Queen and prayeth that the said Writ of Supersedeas according to the Forme of the same Writ to be granted and allowed to him and that the Justices here will not take Cognizance of the plea aforesaid against him c. Counter plea to the writ of priviledge that the Defendant is farmer of the said cheif clark of dives lands c. and traverseth that he is a fervant to him and abiding with him attending in the office Traverse And the said Thomas saith That the Court here for any thing before alledged ought not to be repelled from the having and taking Cognizance of the plea aforesaid because he saith That the said Iohn Wood at the day of the purchasing of the Originall Writ of the same Thomas to wit the same seventeenth day of September Anno c. 44. was Farmer of the same I Rooper Knight of certain Lands of the said I. at B. aforesaid in the said County of Kent without this that the same I W the same day of purchasing of the Originall Writ of the same T. or at any time afterwards was servant of the said I.R. Kinght abiding with the said I. or attending the said I R in his affaires in the Office aforesaid and this he is ready to verifie as the Court shall consider and prayeth the Supersedeas not to be allowed him and that the Court would take further Cogn zance against him c. Demurrer to the counter plea ANd the same Iohn Wood saith That the said Plea of the said T. above pleaded to adnull the said Writ of Supersedeas and also the matter in the same plea contained are insufficient in Law to deprive the same I W. from having the said Writ of supersedeas allowed or that the Court here should take further Cognizance against him in the plea aforesaid and that he to the plea aforesaid in forme aforesaid pleaded hath no need nor by the Law of the Land is held to answer and this hee is ready to verifie Joinder in Demurrer whereupon he prayeth Judgement that the said Writ of supersedeas according to the form of the said Writ may be granted and allowed unto him and that the Justices here would not take further cognizance against him in the plea aforesaid c. And the same T. from whence he sufficient matter in Law to deprive the same I W from having the said Writ of super and that the Court here should take further Cognizance against him of the plea aforesaid hath above alledged which he is ready to verifie which sayd matter the same I. W. doth not gainsay nor any wise answer to the same but doth altogether refuse to admit of the verification thereof prayeth judgement if the said Writ of Supersedeas ought to be granted or allowed unto him and that the Court would take Cognizance against him the said I. W. in the plea aforesaid and because the Iustices c. M. 9 Jac. rot 705. ss A Writ of priviledge allowed for one of the six Clarks of the Chancery The Lord the King sent to his Justices of the Common Bench here his Writ closed in these words James by the Grace of God c. To his Justices of the Bench greeting Whereas the Masters Clarks and Officers of our Court of Chancery and of our progenitors late Kings of Eng and also their servants and familiars whosoever to answer in our Court before you or before any of our Justices or Ministers or other secular Judges whatsoever besides before us in our Chancery aforesaid upon any Writs Causes or Complaints Trespasses Actions or Demands which concern not our person pleas of Freehold Felonyes and Appeales only excepted according to the Jurisdiction Liberties priviledges and Customes of our Chancery aforesaid from the time whereof the memory of man is not to the contrary hitherto obtained ought not to be drawn compelled or imprisoned nor hitherto were wont And now we understand that W. S. Knight doth implead in our Court before you Valentine Saunders Esquire one of the six Clarkes of our Court of Chancery aforesaid for 400 pounds which the same W. doth demand of the said Valentine as it is sayd in Derogation of our Court of Chancery and against the custome aforesaid and because we will inviolably observe the Jurisdiction Liberties priviledges and customes aforesaid We command you that from further holding before you of the plea aforesaid by whatsoever name the same V. be reputed you be altogether superseded declaring to the sayd W. on our behalfe that he follow against the same V. before us in our Chancery aforesaid and no where else If it seeme expedient for him Teste c. 9 November Anno 16. and 45. By pretext of which sayd Writ the Rolls and other Memorables of the Court of the Lord the King here remaining being searched it sufficiently appeareth upon Record that before the same writ of supersedeas was delivered to the said Justices here the same V was put in Exigent in the Hustings of London to be outlawed at the suit of the said VV. in the plea aforesaid which said writ of Exigent before the Justices here is returnable in Octab. S. Hillarii whereupon the same Valentine for his indempnity prayeth a writ of the Lord the King to be directed to the Sheriffs of London to supersede the Execution of the said writ of Exigent so that the same VV. at that day may shew if he can wherefore the same Va the priviledge of the Court Chancery of the said Lord the King according to the forme and effect of the writ aforesaid ought not to have if c. and it is granted to him returnable here at the same Terme c. The same day is given to the said V. here c. H Il. 1. and 2. Eliz. rot 630. The like writ is allowed for a Chancery Clarke H 18 El. rot 602 the like writ is allowed T. 19. El. rot 1213. H. 25. Eliz. rot 2019 A writ of priviledge for a Prothonotaries clarke of the Kings Bench allowed in the Common Bench. P 44 Eliz. rot 1841. The Lord the King c. reciting the writ of priviledge for Richard Swaine Doctor of Lawes one of the Masters of the Chancery Teste Anno 44. and for that the plaintiff alledged nothing in court here wherefore the said writ ought not to be allowed him therefore the plea aforesaid against the same R in the court of the King here shall be no more attempted c. M. 11 H 7 rot 133. T 5 Jac. rot 750 P 18 Jac. rot 1795. for M. P 13. Jac. rot 2192. P 11 Iac. rot 1368. P 36 Eliz. rot 320 P 8 H 7 rot 130. Allowance of a writ of priviledge for T.S. his Clerke one of the servants of our beloved clarke I.B. keeper
of his County Palatine of Lancaster upon Munday in Quarta sepquadrag next coming to answer there in his plea aforesaid if c. ss BE it remembred That T. E Knight H 25 H 8 rot 121. Remissio recordi sent by the Justices of Chester into the Bench to determine a forraign voucher and at a day in the Bench the Tenants make default and the cause for that was determined Iustice of the Lord the King of Chester the twenty third of J that same Term by vertue of a writ of the Lord the King to him directed which followeth in these words Henry the eighth by the Grace of God King of England and France and Lord of Ireland to his Iustice of Chester or to the Keeper of his place there greeting Whereas T T in our Court in our County aforesaid had demanded against R. B. Esquire T.W. and P. A. one windmill one water-mill c with the Appurtenances in N as his right and inheritance and into which the same R. T.W and P. had to entrance unlesse after the Demise which R.T. Knight kinsman of the sayd T. T whose heir he is thereof made to R. S. for a Terme which is past and which after that Terme ought to revert to the said T. T. and the same R.T. and P. pleading in the same Court lately vouched thereof to warranty P.B. summoned in our County of Wilts by the ayd of our court of Chester because the same P. B. had no lands within our County of Chester aforesaid by which he could be summoned which said Warranty in our said Court of Chester for the cause aforesaid cannot be determined to the great Damage of the said T.T. and manifest hinderance of the obtaining of his Right whereupon he hath besought us to provide him a fit remedy in this behalfe We who are Debtors to exhibit Iustice to every one within our Kingdome willing to do what is just to the said T.T. in this behalfe Command you that if it be so far proceeded in our Court of Chester then the Record and proceedings therein with all things touching the same to our Iustices of the Bench under your seal you distinctly and openly send and this Writ so that they may have them at Westminster in Octab. Hil. prefixing the same day to the parties aforesaid that they may be then there to do and receive what shall be considered in our Court there in this behalfe that that warranty being determined before our said Iustices in the Common Bench the said Record and proceedings may be sent you to proceed in the plaint aforesaid as of right and according to the Law and Custome of our County of Chester is to be done witnesse our self at Westminster 6 November Anno c. 25 ANd the said Iustice sent there the Record and proceedings of the said plaint whereof mention is made in the sayd Writ annexed to the same Writ the Tenor whereof followeth in these words Pleas of the County of Chester at Chester before T. E. Knight Justice of the Lord the King upon Thursday next after the Feast of Saint Iames the Apostle Anno H. 8. post Conquest of England 25. Count in Entre ad term qui pret in the County Palatine of Chester CHester ss Thomas Torhet by H. H. his Attorney in the Court of the Lord the King here demandeth against R B. Esquire T W. and P A one wind mill c. with the appurtenances in N. as his right and inheritance and into which the same R T. W. and P. have no entrance unlesse after the demise which Robert S. Knight Kinsman of the said T T. whose heir he is thereof made to R. Scot for a Terme which is past and which after that Term ought to revert to the same T. T. whereupon he saith that the said Robert kinsman c. was seised of the Tenements aforesaid with the Appurtenances in his Demesne as of Fee in the time of peace in the time of Edward late King of England the second after the Conquest taking thereof the profits to the value c. and the same Robert being so thereof seised demised those Tenements with the Appurtenances to the said Richard Scot for a Terme which is past and from the same Robert the right descended c. to one Robert as son and heire c. and from the said Robert the son the right descended to one Thomas as son and heir c. and by many descents the right came to Iohn and from the said Iohn the right came to the said Thomas who is now Demandant as son and heir c. And which after that Terme c and thereof bringeth suit c. And the same R. B. T. W. and P. A. by T. B. their Attorney come and defend their right when c. and pray licence thereof to imparl here untill the next County to wit untill Thursday next after the Feast c next coming and have it c. The same day is given to the said T. T. here c. At which day here came as well the said T. T. by his Attorney aforesaid as the same R. B. T. W. and P. A. by their Attorney here c. and hereupon the same R. B. T. W. and P. A. vouch thereof to warrant P. B. who hath no Lands or Tenements in the County of Chester but all in the County of Wilts and prayeth that the said Peter may be summoned in the County of Wilts A forraigner vouched to warrant by ayde c. and the said T. T. well alloweth the said vouchee c. let him have it c. And because their vouchee to warrant cannot be determined in the said County of Chester day is given to the parties aforesaid here untill the next County to wit untill Thursday next after the feast of the Translation of Saint Edw. next coming c. And in the mean time the writ of the Lord the King may be followed if c. At which day further day is given to the parties aforesaid here untill the next County to wit untill Thursday next after the Feast of Saint Martin the Bishop next coming c. And in the mean time c. At which day a further day is given to the parties aforesaid here untill the next County to wit untill Thursday next after the Feast c. And further the said Justice C to the Justices of the Common Bench here to wit at W aforesaid returneth That he by vertue of the writ aforesaid to him directed prefixed a day to the parties aforesaid at the said Oct. Hil. that they should be here to do and receive as that Writ in it selfe commandeth and requireth At which said Octab. Hill before the said Iustices of the Bench here to wit at Westminster aforesaid Remandment of the plaint came the same T. T. by R. Jenour his Attorney and offered himself the fourth day against the said R. B. T. W. and P. A. in the plea aforesaid and
that they should have his body here at this day to wit 15. Pas to do and receive what the Court of the Lord the King here shall consider of him in that behalf and now here at this day cometh the said Henry by W. C his attorney and sayeth that after the utlawry aforesaid against the said Henry had and published by a certain Act in Parliament of the said Lord the King now by continuance held at Westminster in the county of Midd. the 9 th day of Febru in the seventh yeare of the Lord the King now amongst other things it is inacted established by authory of the same Parliament that all and singular subjects of the said Lord the King aswell spirituall as temporall of this kingdom of England Wales the Islands of I. and G. and the Towne of Barwick the heires successors executors and administrators Pardon pleaded of them and every of them and all and singular corporations in any wise incorporated Cities Borroughs Counties Rideings c. and every of them And the Successor and Successors of them and every of them by the authority of the same Parliament should be acquitted pardoned released and discharged against the said Lord the King his heires and successors and every of them of all Treasons Felonyes offences contempts Trespasses entries injuries deceipts misdemeanors penalties Summes of monies Punnishment by death corporall punishments and pecuniary and generally from all other things causes complâ—ints suits judgments and Executions in the statute aforesaid not excepted nor Foreprised which by the said Lord the King by any meanes or in any other manner could be pardoned before and untill the 9. day of November then last past before the making of the said Act to every or any of his subjects Corporations incorporat Cities Burroughs c. or any of them yet so notwithstanding that every person utlawed shall prosecute his writ of Scire Facias against such party or parties at his or at whose Suit he or they were utlawed before the pardon in such case be allowed to the party utlawed as in the same Act is more fully contayned and the said Henry further saith that the utlawry aforesaid is not excepted nor Foreprised in the same statute Averment that the Utlary is not Averment that he is a Subject and that he is and at the time of the making of the said Act and long before was a subject and leige man of the said Lord the King now born under his obedience to wit at London in the parish c. and this he is ready to verifie where when and how the Court of the Lord the King now shall consider thereof whereupon it is not intended that the said Lord the King will impeach the said Henry by occasion of the utlawry aforesaid whereupon he prayeth judgment that he may be discharged from the said utlawry and because it is expedient and there is a necessity that the same Griffin should be premonished for his interest in this behalfe before the discharging of the same Henry from the utlawry aforesaid be further proceeded in according to the Form of the staute aforesaid The sheriffs are commanded that by honest c. they make knowne to the same G. that he be here in Cr. Ascen Dom. to prosecute against the same Henry his plea aforesaid if c. at which day came the same Henry by his attorney aforesaid and the sheriffs Sci fac awarded Sheriffs returne Sci fac Mercy to wit E. R. and A. P. now retorne that they by vertue of the writ aforesaid to them directed by I. W. and R. G. honest c. made knowne to the same G. of being here to this day to prosecute in Form aforesaid he the fourth day of the plea being solemnly called came not nor any whit further prosecute his said Writ therefore he and his pledges are thereof in mercy let the names of the pledges be inquired of And that the said Henry goe thereof without day Generall Pardon allowed c. and that the generall pardon aforesaid be allowed him c. Count in debt upon a Sci fac upon the generall pardon PAsch 12. Iac. Rot. Brownelow retorn Mense Pas to follow in Form aforesaid c. and now here at this day to wit Mens Pas came aswell the said William by his attorny aforesaid as the said Tho. by R. D. his a torny and the sheriffs as before now retorneth here that he hath nothing c. nor is to be found c. And hereupon the same Tho. declaring against the said Will upon his originall writ in the plea aforesaid said that the said W. had not rendred to the said T. 20 l. which to him he oweth and unjustly detayneth c. for that to wit that whereas the said W. the 20. day of Octo. An. c 3. at London in the parish and ward aforesaid by this certaine writing obligatory granted c. M 1. and 2. Eliz. Rot 1248 in a Scire facias against B. and A. upon a Recognizance one of the defendants is alleaged to be dead and one other processe against him and the others prayeth imparlance ss THe sheriff was commanded whereas R. C. and I. his wife in the Court of the King here had recovered against I. H Sci fac against a Tenant by Elegit and part of the monie levied the Tenant against whom the execution was brings the residue and a redelivery awarded 68 s. for their damages which they had by occasion of the detaining of the dower of the same I. of the Tenements in N. of the indowment of I Son of I. H. her late husband as by a certaine Jury of the country before the Justices of the King assigned to take the assize in the county aforesaid such a day and yeare at Wigo thereof between them Summoned and taken was convicted and the same R and I. came afterwards into the court of the Lord the King here and chose to be delivered to them all the goods and Chattles of the said I. H. besides the Oxen and Cattles of the Plough and likewise the moyety of all his lands and Tenements in his Bayliwick to hold as their free Tenements to them and their assignes accor to the Form of the statute in such case provided untill 68 s. for the damages aforesaid should be thereof levyed whereupon the King commanded them that al the goods and chattles of the said I. H. besides his oxen Cattle of the Plough and likewise the moyety of his lands and Tenements in your Bayliwick without delay you cause to be delivered to the same R. and C. by the resonable price and extent to hold to them and their assignes as their Free Tenement in Forme aforesaid untill 68 s. for their damages aforesaid should be thereof Levyed and in what sort Elegit awarded Return of the Elegit c. should be made Known here such a day c. the same sheriff to the justices of the King
here at that day retorned a certaine extent taken before R. T. Bayliffe of the liberty of the honorable Epi. Wigor of O. at N. on Saturday such and year c. by vertue of the retorne of a certain writ of the Lord the Kingâ— to him by him thereof directed by which it was found that the same Bayliff by vertue of the retorne of the writ of the Lord the King aforesaid delivered to the same R. and I. the moyety of all the Lands and Tenements which the same I. had in his Bayliwick to wit the third part of one Messuage and 40. acres of Land with the appurtenances in N. which said third part is worth by the yeare 4 d. and the said 40. acres of land are worth by the yeare 5 s. to hold to them and their assignes as their Free Tenement untill the said 68 s. should be thereof levied and although the same R. and I. 10 s. 8 d Tender of the residue of monies by the defendant Refusall by the Plaintiffs to accept it out of the tenements aforesaid have now leyyed as by that extent it manifestly appeareth and the same I. H. the whole residue of the said 68 s. to wit 49 s. 4 d. is ready to pay notwithstanding the same R. and. I. have hitherto refused to receive that money as by the information of the same I. H. there the King is given to know Therefore the Bayliff is commanded that by honest c. he make known to the said R. and I. that they should be here at this day to wit in Octo. Mich. to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same R. and I. ought not to be satisfied with the same 49 s. 8 d. and the Tenements aforesaid to them before delivered they ought not to be redelivered to the said I H. if to them it seemed expedient and now here came aswell the same I. H. in his proper person as the same R. and I. by R. W. their attorney Monie brought into Court and the sheriff retorneth that he made known to the same R. and I. of being here at this day in Forme aforesaid by R. B. c. honest c and hereupon I. H. bringeth here into court 8 s. 8 d. ready to render the same R. and I. if c. and prayeth delivery of the Tenements aforesaid Satisfaction c. whereupon it is requested of the same R and I. if they have or know any thing to say for themselves The monies are paid in Court to the Plaintiff and the Court awarded a redeliverance to be awarded to the Plaintiff wherefore they ought not to be satisfied with the money and to redeliver the Tenements aforesaid to the said I. H. who say that not and hereupon the said 53 s 8 d. is delivered to the said R. I. And it is considered by the Court that the said I. and H. shall have delivery of the Tenements aforesaid first delivered to the same R. and I. out of the hands of the same R. and I and that they goe thereof without day c. SEe 21. E. 3. f. 1 Plaintiffe 1. A Scire Facias awarded in Aide 21. E. fo 20. Pl. 21. ss IT was commanded the sheriff whereas I. C. Gent. lately it the Court of the Lady Eliz. late Queen of England here to wit in Easter in the 36. Entry of a Sci fac by an administrator against an executor H. 2 Jac. rot 1613. yeare of her Reigne before E. A. Knight and his associats then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the common Bench here by the consideration of the same Court recovered against R. W. late of c. aswell a certaine debt of 200 l. as 6 l. which to the said I in the same Court were adjudged for his damages which he had by occasion of the said debt whereof he is convicted as by the record and proceedings thereof in the court of the Lord the King here remaining manifestly appeareth execution notwithstanding of the said judgment yet resteth undon And aswell the said I as the said R. W. are dead as by the information of R. C. Gent. administrator of the goods Chattles which were of the said I. C. at the time of his death the King understandeth And because c. that by honest c. It be made knowne to P. R. executor of the Testament of the said W. that he should be here at this day to wit in Cr. Ascen Dom. to shew if any thing c. wherefore the debt and damages aforesaid of the goods and chattles which were of the said W. at the time of his death in the hands of the said P. R. to be administred ought not to be made to the same I. according to the Form of the recovery aforesaid if The Plaintiff shewes the Letters of administration and prayes execution c And now here at this day came aswell the said R. by H. H. his attorney by the said P. premonished by A. B his attorney and the Sheriff now retorneth that he made knowne to the said P. of being here at this day by G. D. and D. E. honest c. to shew in Form aforesaid c. And hereupon the same R. saith that the said I. C. died intestat and that the administrators of all the goods and Chattles which were of the said at the time of his death by I by Divine providence c. was committed And he bringeth here into the Court the Letters Administratory of the said Arch-Bishop which the Commission of the Administration aforesaid in forme aforesaid testifie c. and prayeth Execution against the said P. of the Debt and Damages aforesaid of the goods and chattells which were of the said I. C. being in the hands of the said P at the time of his death to be administred to him to be adjudged c. AND the said P. saith Defendant confesseth assets to 40 s. and traâ—erseth that any other goods of the Intestate besides c. came into his hands c. T 19 Jac rot 2892. That the said R Execution against him of the Dâ—bt and Damages aforesaid of the goods and chattells which were of the said W at the time of his death in the hands of the said P to be administred ought not to have because he protesting saith that the said W after the judgment aforesaid against him in Forme aforesaid had at L aforesaid dyed intestate and that diverse goods and chattells which were of the said W at the time of his death to the value af Forty shillings after the death of the said W. into the hands and possession of the said P. came and that the same P. the said forty shillings about the Funerall of the said W. after the death of the said W. expended without this that any other goods or chattells which were of the said W. at the time of h s death besides the goods and chattells to the value of forty shillings ever
came to the hands and possession of the said P. after the death of the said W. and this c. Judgement if Execution c. AND the said R. saith Peplication that he had more assets at tue Teste of the Writ c. to the value of the debt c. and issue thereupon That hee by any thing before alledged from having his Execution aforesaid of the Debt and Damages aforesaid ought not to be barred because he saith that the said P. the day of the obtaining of the writ of Scire facias aforesaid to wit such a day and year had diverse goods and chattells which were of the same W at the time of his death to be administred to the value of the Debt and Damages aforesaid above recovered besides the goods and chattells to the value of forty shillings which came to the hands of the said P. after the death of the said W. whereof the same P. might have satisfied the said R. of the Debt and Damages aforesaid to wit at S. in the County aforesaid and this he prayeth may be enquired of by the Country and the same Defendant c. Therefore the Sheriff is commanded that he cause to come c. THe Jury say upon their oath Verdict that he had assets to 30 l. at the Teste c. overâ— c. and no more c. as to thirty pounds of the within written two hundred and six pounds parcell that the said P. the day of purchasing of the said Writ of Scire facias to wit such a day and year had diverse goods and chattells which were of the within named W at the time of his death and in his hands to be administred to the value of the said thirty pounds besides the goods and chattells to the value of the said Forty shillings which came to the hands of the same P. after the death of the same W to be administred whereof the same P might have satisfied the said R. of the said thirty pounds Verdect for the Defendant to wit at S aforesaid as the same R hath thereof within alledged and as to the seventy foure pounds of the within named two hundred and six pounds residue the same Iury say upon their oath That the same P. the day of purchasing of the Writ of Scire facias to wit such a day and year had no Lands or Chattells which were of the within named W. at the time of his death in his hands to be administred to the value of the said one hundred seventy four pounds beside the goods and chattells to the value of the said forty shillings Judgement which came to the hands of the said P. after the death of the same W. whereof the same P. could satisfie the same R. of the said one hundred seventy four pounds to wit at S. in the County aforesaid as the same P. thereof within alledged therefore c. search the Judgment with Mr. Brownlow Entry of a Sci fac against an executor of one Manucaptor of three Manucaptors upon a Recognizance of baile upon an arrest in debt c. P 1. Jac. rot 817. Middlesex ss It was commanded the Sheriff whereas by I R of B c. H D of C. c. and T. M. of C. c. of late to wit the twentieth day of Aprill Anno 41 Eliz. before E. A. Knight cheife Justice of the Court of Common Bench of the said Lady the Queen here at his dwelling house in the Charterhouse neer London undertook and every of them did undertake for M. T. late of London c. otherwise called c. in the County of Somerset Gent. in one hundred and fifty pounds And the same Morgan then and there assumed for himselfe in three hundred pounds and if it should happen the same M in a certain plea of Debt upon Demand of one hundred and fifty pounds against the same M by one Elias I in the said Court of the Lady the Queene of the Common Bench Recitall of the recognizance here prosecuted in any lawfull manner to be convinced and Judgement for the same E in the plea aforesaid against the said W. in the said Court to be given that then the same M. the said Debt of one hundred and fifty pounds and also all Damages to the said E by occasion of the detaining of the said Debt in the same Court of the late King against the same M in any manner to be assessed or adjudged would satisfie and render which said one hundred and fifty pounds the same I H and T M severally acknowledge to be made upon their Lands and Chattells And which sayd three hundred pounds the said M acknowledgeth to be likewise made of his Lands and Chattells and to Be levied for the use of the said E if it should happen the same M contrary to the Manucaption aforesaid in any manner to make Default And although the same E afterwards Judgement against the principall Hil. 42 Eliz to wit in the Terme of Saint Hillary Anno 42 Eliz. before E. Anderson Knight and his Associates then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the Bench aforesaid by consideration of the same had recovered against the same M. as well the same one hundred and fifty pounds at the same forty shillings which to the same E in the same Court of the Queen here were adjudged for his Damages which he had by occasion of the detaining of that Debt whereof hee is convicted as by the record and proceedings therein in the same Court of the said late Queen here remaining manifestly appeareth Neverthelesse the same M. hitherto hath not satisfied the same E. of the Debt and Damages aforesaid Breach of the Recognizance nor in the same Court here hath rendred his body in Execution for the Debt and Damages aforesayd according to the Forme of the Recognizance aforesaid and the said T M is dead as by the information of the same E the King is given to understand And because c. that by honest c. he make known to A M Widdow An Alias Sci. fac was awared and continuances divers imparlances ought to be here The Defendant pleads assets to the value of 36 l. 5 s. came to her hands after the death c. and pleads a judgment against the Testator in his life time in London upon concessit solvere and that she had imployeâ— part of the assets about the funerall part about the the probaâ—e of the will part to compound the judgment and the residue brings here into Court ready to pay c. with plea that she hath no more c. The plaint leviviâ—d The plaintiffs finde pledges to prosecute and make their Attorney Executrix of the testament of the same T. M. of being here at this day to wit in Cro Asc Dom to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same one hundred and fifty pounds by the same T in forme aforesaid acknowledged of
Jac. Rot. 1510. It is thus contayned Mid. ss It was commanded the sheriff whereas G. B. of Cobham in the County of Surry gent. had prosecuted a certaine Writ of the Lord the King of Audita querela to the Justices of the Lord the King here directed against one I. D. Doctor of the Lawes upon a certain judgment in the Court of the said Lord the King of the Common Bench here given for the same Iohn against the said O. given aswell of a certaine debt of 200 l. as of 33 s. and 4. d. for his damages which the same I. had by occasion of detayning of that debt by the same Iohn against the said O. in the same court of the said Lord the King here rccovered and the same O thereupon afterwards to wit the 29. day of May An. Rs. c. 7. out of the same Court had obtayned a certaine writ of the said Lord the King directed to the sheriff of Suss against the same Iohn to premonish the said Iohn of being before the Justices of the said Lord the King here to wit at Westminster such a retorn the next following to answer to the said writ of Audita querele And further to do and receive what the Court of the Lord the King shall consider of him in that behalf and whereas also afterwards to wit the said 29. day of May An 7. abovesaid in the same Court before the Justices of the said Lord the King at Westminster came E. M. of c. G. M. of c. T. W. of c. and R. E. and undertook and every of them did undertake for the same O. in the summe of 200 l. and the same O then present in the same Court undertook for himselfe in the summe of 500 l. to prosecute the said writ of Audita querela with effect and if it shall happen judgment against the said O. in this behalfe to be given that then the same O. should satisfie to the same I. of the debt and damages aforesaid in the same Court recorded which said summe of 500 l. the said Owen acknowledgeth of his Lands and Chattles to be made and to be levied to the use and behoofe of the said Iohn And which said severall sumes of 200 l. every of the Mnucaptors aforesaid acknowledge of their Lands and Chattles and every of them to be made if it should happen the said Owing to make default in any of the premisses and thereof to be lawfully convicted and although afterwards to wit in the morrow of the holy Trinity An. Rs. c. 8. after the appearance of the said Iohn to the writ aforesaid made in the Court of the said Lord the King before his Justices here to wit at Westminster by the judgment of the same Court it was considered that the said Owing shall take nothing by the said writ aforesaid but should be in mercy for his false clamor therein And that the said Iohn should goe therein without day c. and prosecute for his execution if to him it should seem expedient Neverthelesse the said Owing of the said 200 l. of the debt aforesaid the said 33 s. and 4 d. for the damages aforesaid hath not satisfied to the said Iohn neither the said Owing the said 500 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged to the said Iohn hitherto hath not paid nor the same Edmond George Thomas Robert or any of them the said 200 l. by them severaly in Form aforesaid acknowledged of their lands and chattles to the same I. D hitherto hath paid as by the information of the said Iohn the King understandeth And because c that by honest c. he make knowne to the said O. E. G. T. and Rob that they should be here at this day to wit 15 Pas to shew if any thing c. to wit the same O wherefore the same 500 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged of his lands and chattles and the same E G. T. and R. wherefore the same 200 l. by them severally in Form aforesaid acknowledged of their Lands and Chattles ought not to be made and rendred to the said Iohn according to the Forme of the acknowledgment aforesaid if c. At which day here came the said John by I N his attorney and offered himself the 4. day against the same O. E. G. T. and R. in the plea aforesaid and they being solemnly called came not and the sheriff now retorneth that they have nothing c. nor are found c. Therefore as before it was commanded the sheriff that by honest c he should make knowne to the said O. E. G. T. and R. that they should be here 15 Pas to shew in Form aforesaid c. At which day here came aswell the same Iohn by his Attorney aforesaid as the said O. E. G. T. and R. by Oth. Gager their Attorney and the sheriff as before retorneth that they have nothing c. nor are to be found c. And hereupon the same Iohn prayeth execution against the said Owin of the said 500 l. by the same O. in Form aforesaid acknowledged and against the same Edmond for the same 200 l. by the same E. in Forme aforesaid acknowledged and against the said George for the said 200 l. by the same George in Form aforesaid acknowledged And against the said Thomas of the said 200 l. by the same Thomas in Form aforesaid acknowledged And against the said Robert of the said 200 l. by the same Robert in Form aforesaid acknowledged to him to be adjudged c. and the same O E. G T. and R. praylicence to imparle and have it c. At which day came here aswell the said Iohn as the said O. E. G. T. and R. by their attornies aforesaid and hereupon the same Iohn as before prayeth judgment and execution against the said O. E. G. T. and R. of the said severall summes by them in Form aforesaid acknowledged to him to be adjudged c. And the same attorney of the said O. E G T. and R. saith that he is not informed c. therefore it is considered that the same I. D. have execution against the same O for the said 500 l. by the same O. in Form aforesaid acknowledged and against the said Ed. for the said 200 l. by the same E in Forme aforesaid acknowledged and against the said George for the said 200 l. by him in Forme acknowledged And against the said Thomas for the said 200 l. by the same Thomas in Forme aforesaid acknowledged And against the said Robert for the said 200 l. by the same Robert in Form aforesaid acknowledged c. T 10. Jac. Rot. 338 Walter Staff ss It was commanded the sheriff Entry of a speciall writ of Scire facias where the lands are extended for the Pâ— but the sheriff saith that he extended the same Lands upon an other Elegit and delivered them to the party and that he cannot deliver them to the pâ— now
sixteen pounds and ten shillings The record of the Assize certifi d into the Bench. and that the same T.C. should be thereof in mercy as by the Record and proceedings therein the Justices of the said Lord the King here to wit at Westminster at the command of the Lord the King sent and in the same Court here before them remaining manifestly appeareth Execution notwithstanding of the judgement aforesaid yet remaineth undone and the same T.T. is dead as by the information of T. T. Esquire son and heir of the said T.T. his Father and Executor of the Testament of the said T.T. his Father the King understandeth and because c. that by honest c. he should make known to the same T.C. that hee should be here in 8. Sancti Michaelis to shew if any thing c wherefore the same T. T. the son Execution upon the judgement aforesaid ought not to have if c. At which said 8. Sancti Michalis Adjournment untill Mens Michaelis ANd now here at this day came as well the same T.T. the Son by E. S. his Attorney as the same T. C. premonished c. by I. A. his Attorney and the sheriff now returneth that he had made known to the said T.C. of being here at this day to shew in Forme aforesaid c. by M. H. and E. H. honest c. and hereupon the same T.T. son and heir bringeth here into Court the Letters Testamentary of the said T.T. his Father by which it appeareth to the Court here the same T. T. the son to be Executor of the Testament aforesaid and thereof to have the Administration c. And as Son and heir of the said T. T. his Father prayeth that the Nusance aforesaid by the view of the Recognitors aforesaid may be removed and that the banck aforesaid may be cast down c. so that the water aforesaid by the gutter aforesaid through the same close of the same T.C. called H. and from thence unto the common River called Fosse in the said County of Lincoln into its ancient course at the charges of the said T.C. may be reduced and as Executor of the Testament aforesaid prayeth Execution for the Damages aforesaid to be adjudged unto him c. ANd the same T.C. nothing to hinder the Execution of the judgement aforesaid sayth whereby the same T. T. the son remaineth against the same T.C. therein without defence N. l. dic Therefore it is considered that the said T.T. son and heir of T.T. his Father and as Executor of the Testament aforesaid have Execution of the judgement aforesaid against the same T.C. in forme aforesaid given c. P 21. Iac. rot 1816. Brownlow Norff. ss Entry of a Sci. fac for the Tenant in a wâ—it of dower to have execution of the lands to the vaâ—ue c. of the third part recovered in dower after seisin hod af the third paâ—t demanded for the demandant against the Tenant It was commanded the sheriff whereas Ioane Morrell widdow who was the wife of John M. Gent. lately in the Court of the Lord the King now here to wit at Westminster had demanded against Robert Long Gent the third part of one Messuage c. with the Appurtenances in H. as her Dower which hapned to her out of the free Tenement which was of the said I her late husband by writ of the Lord the King Dedo te unde nichil habet And the same Robert in the same Court of the Lord King here called Iohn N. Gent. summoned in the County aforesaid to warrant against her which said Iohn M. summoned afterwards in the Court of the Lord the King here made default by which it was then considered in the same Court of the King here in the Terme of Saint Michael Anno Regis nunc 18. that the said Ioan should recover her seisin against the same Robert of the third part aforesaid with the appurtenances and that the same Robert should have of the third part of the said I. N. to the value of the third part aforesaid with the Appurtenances by default of the sayd I. N. and although the same Ioan hath obtained her seisin of the third part aforesaid with the appurtenances by vertue of the judgement aforesaid neverthelesse the same Robert of the third part of the same I. N. to the value of the third part aforesaid hath not attained and because c. that by honest c. he should make known to the said I. N that hee should be here at this day to wit A Die Pas in â—unam mensem to shew if any thing c. wherefore the same Robert of the third part of the same I N. to the value of the third part aforesaid with the Appurtenances according to the Forme of the Recovery aforesaid ought not to have c. And now here at this day came the same Robert by Luke Constable his Attorney and offered himselfe the fourth day against the said I. N. in the same plea and he being solemnly called came not and the sheriff now returneth that he by vertue of the Writ aforesaid to him directed made known to the same I.N. of being here at this day to shew in form aforesaid by Iohn Doo and R. R. c. Therefore it is considered that the same Robert have Execution and seisin against the said I.N. of the lands of the said I. N. to the value of the third part aforesaid with the appurtenances by default c. and hereupon the same Robert prayeth a Writ of the Lord the King to be directed to the sheriff of the County aforesaid to cause to be made to him full seisin of the Lands of the said Iohn N. to the value of the third part aforesaid with the appurtenances to hold to him in severalty by metes and bounds and it is granted to him returnable here in Crastino sancti Trinitatis c. T 21. Iac. rot 3360. Brownlow Dorset ss Sci. fac sued by the administrators to have Execution upon a judgement had by them as administrators Hurding and Martin Admistrators of Martin sue out a Scire facias upon a judgement had by them as Administrators M. 18. Iac. against Starr for fourteen pounds as for six pounds and have Execution by default without shewing the Letters of Administration Quaere for they brought them into Court upon the first declaration H 21. 21. Iac. rot 3150. Gulston Otherwise as it appeareth in Mich. Terme Anno 21. Entry of a Sci. fac against the sheriff to render to the plaintiff so maâ— catrell as were replevied by him by pledges for that the pledges are insufficient Quaere whether such writ ought to be brought in Middlesex where the record of the recovery remaineth or where the Testat Sci. fac is to wit in the county of Surrey 18 E. 4. 18. and 22. 9 H. 6. fol. 42. 15 24. 19 2 H. 6. 15. 21 H. 6. 40. 4 H. 7. 67. 10 H 7. 11. 3
or Coppice called Weston Wood aforesaid and also the third part of the profits of the Mannor-Court of Weston upon the green aforesaid Tythes of wood Third part of the profits of Mannor Couâ—t 3d part of the the advowson of the vica ridge of W. and of one Close called Cow-lease c. And also the Advowson of the vicaridge of the Church of Weston aforesaid to hold to the said Countesse and her assignes in severalty by metes and bounds in the name of her whole Dower to her out of the Hundred Mannor Tenements Rectory and Advowson aforesaid after the death of the sayd Francis late Earl of Berks her late Husbandhapning as by the sayd Writ to him it was commanded c. The like assignment of Dower between the same parties upon the same Roll. Summons ss JUry of twenty four Knights of the Neighbour hood of T. ven recogn if the Jury by whom a certain inquisition was lately summoned in the Court of the Lady the Queen Entry of a writ of summons in an attaint executed and awarding of a resummons against the defendant hab corp against the grand Iury and Distring against the petii jury before the Iustices of the said Lady the Queen here to wit at Westminster by writ of the Lady the Queen and afterwardr before the Beloved and faithfull of the said Lady the Queen R. C. Knight Cheif Iustice of the Lady the Queen assigned to hold pleas before the said Queen and G. G. Esquire Attorney Generall of the said Lady the Queen Justices of the said Lady the Queen assigned to take the Assizes in the County aforesaid by writ of the said Lady the Queen of Nisi prius by Form of the statute c. at Stonystratford in the County aforesaid taken between R M. Gent. plaintiff and I.Y. of T. c. and R. W. of T. c. of a certain Trespasse to the same R. by the said I. and R. done as it was said made a false oath as the same R. greivously complaining hath shewed to the said Lady the Queen or not And now here at this day to wit in Octab sancti Hillarii came the same R. M. by T. his Attorney and the said I. Y. and R.W. summoned c. 4 Die pl. being solemnly called came not and of them the sheriff now returned that he summoned Summons returned c. therefore let the same I.Y. and R W. be resummoned that they be here 15. Pas to hear the sayd Iury of twenty four Knights and also J. Jugram I. S. I. S. c. twelve Iurors of the first Inquisition aforesaid being called came not and of them the sheriff now returneth that every one of them is severally attached by pledges J Denn and R Fenn Hab. corp Iur. 24 Milit. Therefore they in mercy c. therefore the Iury of twenty four Knight aforesaid is respited here untill the said Terme Distring Iur. prim inqisitionis c. and that the sheriff have then and there the bodyes of the same Iury of twenty four Knights to make the said Recognizance c. their Lands c. and that of the issues c so that he may have their bodies here at that Terme to heare the Recognizance the same day is given to the same R.M. here c. P 8. Jac. rot 1938. Brownlow Lincoln ss Entry of a writ of summ and resumm in attaint and Distring awarded against the grand Iury the party and the petit Iury. Iury of twenty four Knights of the Neighbourhood of W. vid. Recogn si Jur. by whom a certain inquisition was lately summoned before the Lord the King at Westminster by Bill without the writ of the said Lord the King between Henry Earl of Lincolne one of the Peeres c. of England and Ed. Dymock Knight of certain Trespasses and contempts against the Forme of the statute De scandalis magnat therein lately made and provided and afterwards before the beloved and faithfull Peter Warburton Knight one of the Iustices of the Lord the King of the Common Bench and Thomas Foster Knight one of the Justices of the said Lord the King of the same Bench Iustices of the said Lord the King assigned to take the Assizes in the County aforesaid by writ of the said Lord the King De nisi prius by Forme of the statute therein made and provided P 4. Eliz rot 532. Cerciorare to certifie a retorn whereupon an attaint is brought The grand jury the Defendant and the petit Jury make default Quaere the sheriff returns not the writ Resummons awarded against the grand Jury parties and petit Iury. at the Castle of Lincolne in the County aforesaid taken made a false Oath as the said Earl to the said Lord the King now greiviously complaining sheweth or not And now here at this day to wit Tres Sept. Pasch here came the sayd Earle by his Attorney aforesaid and as well the Iurors of the Iury of twenty four Knights aforesaid as the same E. D. and also Lawrence Coddington of C. with eleven other Iurors of the first inquisition aforesaid being solemnly called came not therefore let the same jurors of the jury of twenty four Knights be resummoned that they be here in Octab. Sancti Trinitatis to make the jury of twenty four Knights and that jury of twenty four Knights is respited here untill that Terme and as well the said E as the said jurors of the first inquisition aforesaid are resummoned that they may be here at the same time to hear the said Iury of twenty four Knights the same day is given to the said Earle here c. At which day here came the said Earle by his Attorney aforesaid and the sheriff did nothing therein nor sent the writ thereof therefore as before let another writ thereof be made returnable here 15. Michaelis the same day is given to the said Earl here c. At which day here came the said Earle by his Attorney aforesaid and as well the sayd Edward as the said twelve jurors of the first inquisition aforesaid resummoned Al. resum awarded c. 4 Die pl. being called came not c. and also the jury of twenty four Knights aforesaid likewise being called came not therefore that jury of twenty four Knights is respited here untill Cr. sancti Martini and the sheriff is commanded that he distrain as well the sayd jury of twenty foure Knights that they be then here to make the jury of twenty foure Knights aforesaid A Distring awarded See the like between the parties aforesaid M 9 Iac rot 3127. Br. as the same Edward as the same Iury of twelve jurors of the first inquisition aforesaid that they be here at the same time Auditur Recognitionem illam c. the same day is given to the said Earle here c. and it is to be known that a writ thereof the Iustices here in Court that same Terme have delivered a writ thereof to R. S.
tâ—e Pl. la non comorâ—ns Travers was Comorant and conversant at N. aforesaid within the Isle of Weight in the said county of Southampton without this that he the same day or at any time afterwards was Comorant and coversant at Grayes Inne in the County of Midd. As by the said Record of emanation of the said writ of Exegint above is supposed and this he is ready to verifie whereupon for that the writ of proclamation was not directed to the sheriff of the said county of South wherein the said P. at the day of the issuing forth of the said writ of Exig was comorant and conversant as of right it ought to have beene directed according to the Forme of the statute aforesaid the same P. prayeth judgment and he from the court here of the utlawry aforesaid may be acquitted discharged and set at large c. ANd the said W. saith that he cannot gainesay but that the allegation of the said P. in his discharge of the utlawry aforesaid is true Confession of the garnishee nor but that the same P. at the said Oct. Pur. which day the said writ of Exigent whereupon the same P. was utlawed issuing from the court here was commorant conversant at N. c and that no writ of proclamation in this behalfe was directed to the sheriff of the County of S. as the same P. hath above alleaged c. ANd E. Coke Esquire Attorney generall of the said Lady the Qu. who followeth for the said Lady the Queen in this behalfe Confession of the attorney generall upon a testimony thereof consulting if he knew or would say any thing wherefore the said P. ought not to be discharged from the utlawry aforesaid of which credable information is given him by W. M. of c. and others faith worthy that the allegation of the said P. in the discharge of the same P. from the utlawry aforesaid is true whereupon the same E giveing credit to them sayeth that he cannot gainesay but truly confesseth Judgment that the utlawry be reversed salvo jure Reginae c. that the said P. at the said Oct. Pur. which day the said writ of Exigent whereupon the said P. is utlawed issuing out of the court here was commorant and and conversant at N aforesaid c in the county of S. and that no writ of proclamation was ever directed to the said sherff of S. in this behalfe as the said P. hath above alleaged wherefore it is considered that the same P. be discharged of the utlawry aforesaid and upon that occasion not be molested in any thing nor grieved but goe thereof quiet c. reserving a writ to the Lady the Queen otherwise if c. Entry of a speceill writ of Cap. utlagat amerciament of the sheriff for bad attendance upon the court and not coming to receive a speciall Cap. utlagat Recitall of the speciall Utlagat H 2. Jac. Rot. 1362. Broker Cardigan ss It was commanded the sheriff that he should not omit for any liberty of his county but by the oath of honest and lawfull men of your county you should inquire what goods and chattels lands and Tenements M U c. with all his additions hath or had in his Bayliwick such a day and yeare or at any time afterwards which day he was utlawed in the County of the City of the city of O. at the suit of I. S. in a plea of debt whereof he was convicted As the sheriff of the City of Oxon to the Justices of the Lord the Ki. now here at a certaine day now past retorned P. 24 Iac. rot 323. Vict. in mia 5. marks for retorning trade upon a writ that was ent ed upon Record P. 6 H 8 rot 296. the like sur nichil fec nec remisit H. 8 H 6 rot 333 vic in mia 40 l. for not returning of a writ of Nisi prius H 24 Eliz rot 1702. entry of a speciall amerciament for an insufficient retorn upon an Habere fac possessionem emii Recitall of days given to the sheriff to come and receive the writ sin court And that upon their oath he cause them to be extended and appraised according to the true value of them And such things as shall be found by that Inquisition he cause to be taken into the hands of the Lord the King now safely to be kept so that he may answer to the Lord the King of the true value and issues of them and with them so extended and appraised he make knowne to the Justices of the Lord the King here tli retorn distinctly and openly under his seale and the seales of them by whose oath he had made that extent and appraisment And for that the same M. did ly hid wander and runn from place to place in the county aforesaid in contempt of the Lord the King now and prejudice of his Crowne as the King hath been informed That wheresoever it shall happen the same M. to be found in his Baylickwick aswel within as without the liberties he should take him and safely keep so that he might have his body before the Justices here at the said Terme to do and receive whatsoever the said Court of the Lord the King shall consider in that behalf and it is to be known that at the two severall dayes in that same Term given to the said sheriff of Cardigan by the Court here To come here into the Court and receive the Writ aforesaid to be executed in Form of Law the same sheriff came not here into the Court to receive that Writ therefore the same sheriff to wit R. P. Knight in miserec And he is fined by the Justices here to 12 l. c. TRin. 8. Jac. Rot. 2700 Brownlow Norff. ss It was commanded the Coro of the Lord the Ki of the C. aforesaid that whereas it was testified for the Lord the Ki. in the C. of the said Lord the K. here that divers wits of the said Lord the Ki. by exig of late directed to the sheriff of N. issuing out of the said Court here A special amerciament of the coroners for not certifying of an utlawry after a Cerciorare to them made and before the Iustices here at certain dayes aswell past as to come retornable and many utlawries into the said Court here not as yet certified against the parties Defendants in the same writs named in the county aforesaid published and judgments thereupon are given by the said Coroners And Especially one utlawry against one R. B. late of P. c. in the County of Norff. Gent. at the suite of R. W. in a plea of Debt and because the Lord the King will adhibit due and speedy remedy to the said R. W. in his action aforesaid he doth command the same Coroners that scearching theire Roles and Record and other memorables T. Io 21 23 bayle to an ulawry being in theire custodyes the utlawry aforesaid upon the writ aforesaid
in Forme aforesaid published and the judgment thereupon by the said Coroners given they have here at this day to wit in Oct. S. Trin. That the same justices may doe therein what of right and according to the Law and custome of England ought in this behalfe to be done and now here at this day came the same W. H. by W. B. his attorney and because the Coroners of the County aforesaid the writ aforesaid which was otherwise delivered to them to be executed in Form of Law had not here at this day Miserec XL s. Therefore the said Coroners to writ H. T. and I. L. in Miser And are fined by the Iustices here at 40 s. P 12. Jac. Rot. 2243. Goldesbursh Montgomery ss E. P. Esquire sheriff of the County aforesaid for that he returned not here in court a certaine writ of Capias utlagat against M. P. at the suite of R. O. Kni. in a plea of Debt retornable before the Justices here Mens Pas that same Term. in mercy c. And is fined by the Iustices aforesaid at 60 s. See Grislyes case Cok. 8. fo 40. B. according to the old book of entryes title record M. 27. H. 7 rot 531. Amerciament det ver at 10 l. for not returning the Habeas Corpus Jur. Devant the Justices de Nisi prius P 13. Jac. rot 733. Brownlow Sar. ss Reversall of an Utlary for insufficient return of a Certiorare It was commanded the sheriff that he should not omit for any liberty of his county but that he should take H N. of c. utlawed in London on Monday next after the Feast of S. Leonard the Abbot An. regis c. 12. at the suite of Henry Breton in a plea of debt if c. so that he might have his body here at this day to wit A dâ—e Pas in 15. dies To do and receive what the court of the King here should consider of him in this behalfe and now here at this day came the said Henry N. in his proper person and the sheriff to wit Rowland Traps Esquire now retorneth that he by vertue of the said writ to him directed took the body of the said He. N. whose said body he now hath here ready as by the said writ it was commanded him c. And hereupon the said Henry N. prayeth the hearing of the writ of Cerciorare whereupon the utlawry aforesaid by Iohn Gore and William Gore then sheriffs of London To the court of the Lord the King here was certified and to him it is read in these words London ss we I. G and W G. sheriffs of London do certifie to the Justices of the Lord the King at Westminster in the writ to this schedule annexed specifyed that searching the roles records and other memorables being under our custody we find in the same that Henry N. of A. in the County of Sur. Esquire in the writ aforesaid named put in the hustings of London being five times called and not appearing he was utlawed in mannor as followeth That is to say at the hustings of the Common pleas held in Guild-hall in the City of London upon Monday next after the Feast of c. An. Rs. c. 12. the said Henry N. was the first time called and appeared not and at the bustings of the Common pleas held in Guild-hall c. on Munday next after the Feast c. An. Sup. the same H. was the second time called and appeared not The answer of H. Iay and T. B. sheriffs That writ as above indorsed was delivered subscirbed to the sheriffs by the said sheriffs at their departure from theire office At the hustings of common pleas held at Guild-hall of the City aforesaid on Munday next before the Feast c. An. Supr the said Henry was the third time called and appeared not At the hustings of the common pleas held c. The said Henry was the fourth time called and appeared not at the husting c. The said Henry was the fift time called and appeared not Therefore he was utlawed The answer of P. P. and M L. sheriffs and this is the utlawry in manner and Forme as it is published against the said Henry Nudigate which we have ready before the Justices at the day and place contayned in the same writ according to the intent of that writ The answer of Iohn Gore and William Gore sheriffs which being read and heard the same H. Nudigate saith that he is injured in this behalfe and that by the law of the land ought not to be charged with the said utlawry because he saith that in the retorne aforesaid between these words said sheriffs a certaine materiall word is omitted to wit late so that by the omission of the said word it doth not appeare by the returne aforesaid by which sheriffs the said Henry N. was the third fourth and fift time called or by the said sheriffs now or by the said late sheriffs as it ought to appeare by the said retorne For that cause the said returne is insufficient in Law and this he is ready to verifie whereupon he prayeth judgment that he may be discharged from the said utlawry whereupon the said return being seen and by the said Justices here being fully examined and understood It seemed to the Justices here that the allegation of the said H. N. is true in his discharge from the utlawry aforesaid therefore it is considered that the said utlawry be adnulled and altogether taken for nothing And that the said H. N. for that occasion be unmolested not in any thing grieved But goe therein quiet c. Vtlary reversed for variance between the Record and the writ of Exig fac T 7. Jac. rot 3608. Brownlow Sussex ss It was commanded the sheriff and so recite the Capias utlagat as in the next before as by the said writ to him it was commanded c. which said Francis being so taken and had prayeth bearing of the writ of Exigent whereupon the same F. at the suite of the said W. in Forme aforesaid is utlawed And it is read unto him in these words James by the Grace of God c. reciting the writ and Test untill you come to and of Scotland the XL. he also prayeth the hearing of the record whereupon that writ Issued And it is read unto him in these words ss It was commanded the sheriff that he should take Francis Challoner late of c. in the county aforesaid Esquire otherwise called F. C. de L. in the County of Sussex Esquire if c. and safely c. so that he shall have his body c. and so recite the whole entry untill you come to in Forme of Law to be executed c. which being read and heard the said Francis saith that he is injured in this behalfe and that he by the law of the land ought not to be charged with the utlawry aforesaid because he saith that there is manifest variance between
the said writ of Exigent and the said Record from whence the said Writ issued and which ought to warrant that writ in this That in the said Record the said Francis is named F. C. of Lynfield And in the said Writ of Exigi fac he is named F. C. of Lymfeild and so there is variance betweene the Record and Writ aforesaid whereupon he prayeth judgment and that he may be discharged from the utlawry aforesaid Whereupon the writ and record aforesaid being seene and by the Justices here fully understood it sufficiently appeareth to the justices here That the allegation of the said F. in discharge of the utlawry aforesaid is true Therefore it is considered that the said F. be discharged from the utlawry aforesaid And for that occasion shall not de molested or in any thing grieved but goe thereof without day c. M 6. Jac. rot 924. And now here at this day came the said A. by W. K. his Attorney and prayeth the hearing of the writ of Exigi Fac. whereupon the said A. at the suite of the said G. is utlawed Utlary reversed for that the Capias whereupon the Exigent issued was awarded after a yeare and a day without a Sci fac to revive the judgment And it is read unto him in these words James c. which being read and heard the same attorney on the behalfe of the said A. saith That the same A ought not to be charged with the utlawry aforesaid because he saith that the judgment whereupon the same A. was convicted was given in Mich. Term An. Rs. 3. that is say by one yeare three Moneths and more before the proclamation of the said Writ of Capias ad satisf whereof mention is made in the said Writ of Exigent whereupon the said writ of Exigent issued In which case the same G. Execution upon that judgement ought not then to prosecute unlesse he had prosecuted before out of this Court a writ of the Lord the King of Scire Facias to premonish the said A. of being here in Court to shew wherefore the said E. ought not to have execution against him according to the Form of the Recovery if to him it had seemed Expedient And so the said Writ of Capias for execution of the judgment aforesaid in Forme aforesaid prosecuted And the said writ of Exigent thereupon issuing was erroniously prosecuted and for that cause prayeth that the utlawry aforesaid may be adnulled c. whereupon aswell the Record of the judgment aforesaid as the record of the adjudging of the said Writ of Exigi Fac. whereupon the said writ of Capias ad satisfaciendum in the same record recited by the Court here being seen and fully understood It is found that the allegation of the said A. is true Utlary reversed for omission of the word Quinte in the 5. Exact and for that the last County was held upon Sunday Therefore it is considered c. and that the utlawry be reversed M 4. Jac. Rot. 306. Which being read and heard the said A. saith that he ought not to be charged with the utlawry aforesaid because he saith that by the returne aforesaid it doth not appeare That the same A. at the said County of South held at the Castle of Winch. the same eight day of September An. 8. abovesaid was called and so the same A. was not the fift time called as by the law of the Land he ought to have been And also for that the 6. day of October whereupon the last County was held was Sonday in which case according to the Law of this Realme of England the County ought to be held And so the utlavvry aforesaid against the same A. in Forme aforesaid published and had is altogether void And judgement that it be reversed The like reversall in Mich. 44 45. Eliz. rot 1909. Utlary reversed for that the day of the 5 Exact was before the Test of the Exigent T 13. Iac. Rot. 3617. Brownlow Which being read and heard the same Robert saith that he is injured c because he saith that it is vicious to vvit in that that it appeareth That the said first day of March An. Sup. upon vvhich day the said Robert vvas quinto Exactus vvas longe before the issuing forth of the said Writ of Exigent And for that cause and others in the returne aforesaid being prayeth judgment that the utlavvry aforesaid may be reversed c. vvhereupon c. And it vvas reversed c. Int. Smith and Wingham M. 10. Iac Rot. 3398. the like Cook against Tompson Primo Exact held after the return of the Exigent M 10. Iac. Rot. 1708. Brownlow Bradbury adv Allen Exigi Fac. retornable Tres Trin. T. 24. Ia. 8. I. The first County vvas held 7. Feb. 9. Ia And because it appeareth by the returne aforesaid That the first county vvhereat the said E. vvas first called vvas held after the retorne of the said Writ of Exigent and for that cause c. Vtlary reversed for omission of the word Scotie out of the stile of the Writ T 13. Iac Rot. 3527. Brownlow Hearing of the Writ of Exigi fac is prayed vhich being read c. the said Writ is vicious to vvit in this that this vvord Scotiae is omitted in the beginning of the said vvrit And for that cause and others being in the said Writ he prayeth judgment c And the utlavvry is reversed betvveen Walker and Vaughan H 12. Iac. Rot. 2265. Brownlow Utlavvry reversed for not naming the names of the Coroners particularly at the end of the retorne of the Exigent Vtlary reversed for default of the Coroners names and hereupon the same I. prayeth hearing of the return of the vvrit de Exigi Fac And it is read to him in these vvords At my County held c. untill Therefore by the judgment of the Coroners of the county aforesaid he is utlavved vvhich being read and heard onerari non because he saith that in the record aforesaid no mention is made of the name of any Coroner vvho gave judgment upon that Writ or should vvarrant the judgment And for that cause the returne aforesaid is insufficient in lavv in t Lavel and others at the suit of Godolph see Harper fo 19 a by Justice Browne If the sheriff retorne upon the Exigent the quinto Exact et non Compe Ideo ut lagat est It is a good return Although he retorne not the judgment of the Coroners for it is comprised in these words Ideo ipse utlagat est H 12 Jac. rot 1949. Brownlow Utlar Waviar reversed for the same defect Reversall for omitting the Coroners Names which being read c. the same Martha and Anthony say that they are wronged in this behalfe and that the same M of the Waiver aforesaid or the said Anthony with the Outlawry aforesayd ought not by the Law of the Land to be charged because they say that the return aforesaid is vicious and
named I. B. was the first time called appeared not c. Return of the Exigent which being read and heard the same administrator saith that the utlawry aforesaid against the said I. in Forme aforesaid published and had is altogether void and of no Force nor effect in law because he saith that in the retorne aforesaid whereas it is expressed the said Iames to have been called at the said first county a certaine principall word to wit Norff. betweene these words meum Tent. which should denote and declare the name of the County aforesaid is omitted out of the said return whereby no first county by the law of the land was held To which the said Iames in his life time could render himselfe to the said sheriff of No. to save himselfe from the utlawry aforesaid And for that cause and others being in the retorne aforesaid That retorne is insufficient in law And this he is ready to verifie whereupon he prayeth judgment that the utlawry aforesaid may be reversed avoided and taken altogether for nothing and that the goods and chattles which were of the said Iames at the time of his death in the hands of the said administrator to be administred may be discharged from the utlawry aforesaid and hereupon the said retorne being seen And by the Justices here fully examined and understood It seemeth to the Justices here that the utlawry aforesaid shall be reversed vacated and taken altogether for nothing and that the goods and chattels which were of the said Iames at the time of his death being in the hands of the said administrator to be administred be discharged from the utlawry aforesaid c. Another forme of reversall of an Vtlary against the Intestate by the Administrator upon the Exigent roll and not in the same teâ—me in which it was reversed T 4 Jac. rot 2990. Page London ss Hugh ap David against Williams in debt the Exigent awarded retorned 8. Mich. 4. Jan. the utlawry is entred upon the Role and afterwards the 25. day of Aprill 10. Iacobi Henry Williams administrator of the said W. Williams comes shewes his letters of administration and prayeth hearing of the writ of Exigent with the returne thereof And prayeth that the goods in his hands may be discharged from the said utlawry because the Exigent and the returne thereof are erronious And the utlawry for error was reversed And that the goods and chattles which were of the said intestate at the time of his death being in the hands of the said Henry should be discharged from the utlawry aforesaid c. Utlary reversed for that there is no such name in Baptisme M 21 Iac. rot Brownlow Norff. ss It was commanded the sheriff c. utlawry reversed by the administrator which being read c. and the administrator prayeth hearing of the Roll of the Exigent And it is read unto him c. which being read c. the said administrator saith that the record is vitious and defective in law in this to wit That in divers places of the record aforesaid is written Edmindo for this word Edmundo which said word Edmundus is a name of Baptisme and that there is not any such word Edmindus as it is written in the Record aforesaid And that in the Record aforesaid is written recuperuit whereas it ought to be written or thographically Recuperavit and not Recuperuit And in the Record aforesaid there are materiall Words omitted To wit quodam Debito in these words de quadraginta so that by the omission of those materiall words aforesaid The Record aforesaid is altogether imperfect And this the said administrator is ready to verifie by the same Record of the Term of the holy Trinity An. 16. Reg. Rot. 1297. in the Court of the Lord the King now here remayning whereupon he prayeth judgment and that the utlawry aforesaid may be reversed c. Reversall of an Vtlary for that in the body of the Record the Proclamution is directâ—d to the Sheriff of Kent but in the Margent it is written Sussex for Kent M 21. Jac. rot Brownlow Sussex ss inter Smith and T. utlawed in Com. Sussex And prayeth hearering of the Exigent Role and it is read unto him untill and it commanded to the sheriff of K. that in his full county he make proclamation to the said David c. And the proclamation in the Margent is awarded in Sussex which being read he saith that the record is vitious in it selfe to wit in this that in the body of the record aforesaid it is commanded to the sheriff of Kent that he should make proclam the said David according to the Form of the statute in this case made and provided And in the margent of the said record it appeareth that the said writ of proclamation to be adjudged to the sheriff of Sussex and so it appeareth that the record aforesaid is varying uncertaine and contrary in it selfe And that searching the writ retornable in Cro. Trin. of the sheriff of the county of Kent noe Writ of proclamation against the said David was retorned by the said sheriff of Kent whereby the utlawry aforesaid against the said D in Form aforesaid published and had is void and of no force nor effect in Law Whereupon the record being seene and the Writs of the said county of Kent of the said Cr. Trin. filed in court here being searched fully examined and understood it seemeth to the said justices here that the alilegation of the said David is discharged of the utlawry aforesaid is true c. H 22. Jac. rot 2426. Brownlow Lond. ss B. and P. at the suit of C. the utlawry reversed for that the first county was held 14. Iu. 22. and the 2. Counties was held 9. August 22. Jac. which being read and heard c. Onerari non Utlary reversed for that one month was united between the first and the second Counties because he saith that the returne aforesaid is vitious and defective in Law to wit in this that it appeareth by the said retorne that the said county at which the said John and Eliz. were first called was held the said 14. day of June an 22. abovesaid and the said county at which the said John and Eliz. were the second time called was held the said 9. day of August An. 22. abovesaid whereas in truth the said second county the 9. day of July An. 22. abovesaid being the Moneth next following the moneth of June in which the said first County was as is aforesaid held by the sheriff of the county aforesaid ought to have beene held so by the retorn aforesaid it suficiently appeareth that the said 5. counties by the sheriff said for the county aforesaid in form aforesaid held at which the said Iohn and Eliz. in forme aforesaid were called Were not held from moneth to moneth successively one after an other as by the law of the land by the said sheriff they ought to have
been held And this they are ready to verifie whereupon c. T 8. Iac. rot 4640. which being read and heard onerari non Vtlary reversed for omitting the second exact between the first and third because he saith that by the retorne aforesaid it evidently appeareth that the said R. was never the second time called upon the said Writ of Exi fac so that the utlawry aforesaid against the said Ric. the second calling of him the said R. upon the Writ aforesaid being omitted was published and had so that the utlawry aforesaid against him the said R. so published and had is void and this c. The utlawrie is reversed Januaii for Januarii Vtlary reversed for omitting the return of the Plu. cap. in the close of the Exigent H 22. Iacobi rot 1404. Ianuaii for Ianuarii H. 7. Iac. rot 3503 utlawry reversed for omitting the retorn of the plu cap. in the close of the Exigent P 10. H. 4. rot 337. One renders himselfe prisoner to the Fleet upon an utlawry And because it appeareth that the exigent was not entred upon record in any other Terme he is discharged of the utlawry and set at large Norff. I. at the suit of D. Veiwe Entry of a writ of view in Formedon in discender and a quashment of the same for a speedier returne thereof then by Law it ought TRin. 8. Iac. roll 485. Wolastone City of Yorke ss It was commanded the sheriffs that without delay they should cause to be had to the Gardian searcher or master of the Scoole and Elemosinary poore of the Hospitall of S. Iohn the Baptist in K. R. the view of one Mesuage with the appurtenances in the parish of Arpon the pavement which William Lister in the court here claimeth against them as his right by writ of the Lord the King de forma donationis in discendere and that it should be said to 4. Knights who should be present at that view That they should be here at this day to wit in Cr. Trin. to testifie the said view And that they should have here the names of the Knights and that writ and now here at this day came aswell the said W. L as the Gardian c. by their attorneys aforesaid and upon this Writ of view is quashed because it appeareth here that the said writ is vitious to wit in this that it issued forth retornable here on the said morrow of the holy Trinity where it ought by due course of Law to have beene made retornable here tres Trin. because the plea aforesaid had his last continuance untill Oct. Pur. Beat. Mariae last past Therefore at the petition of the demandant A new writ of view awarded and by the consent of the attorny of the said Guardion c. let another writ thereupon be made in Form as aforesaid retornable here in Cr. Anim. And in the meane while c. at which day here came the parties c. by their attornies and the sheriff sent not the Writ Therefore let another Writ thereof be made in Form aforesaid retornable here tres Pas the same day is given to the same W. L here c. TRin. 11. Iac. roll 3388. Goldesburgh Ebor. ss The sheriff was commanded that he should attach William Denton so that he might have him here at such a day to answer W. H. Gent. one of the attornies Entry of a baile taken upon an attachment of Priviledge in an action of debt c. according to the liberties and priviledges c. of a plea of debt c. and now here at this day came aswell the said W. H. in his proper person as the said W. D. in his proper person under the custody of the sheriff of the county aforesaid by vertue of the Writ aforesaid here brought to the bar And hereupon such a day that same Term before Peter W. Knight one of the Justices of the said Lord the King c. at his chamber in Chancery-lane London came the said W. D. in his proper person under the custody of the sheriff of the county aforesaid And hereupon one R. W. of Cliffords Inne London being present in his proper person before the said Justices undertooke for the said W. D. H 8. b. 8 rot 1. an appearance entred upon an attachment upon an information in the summe of 20 l. and the said William D. assumed for him selfe in the summe of 40 l. to have the body of the said W. D. here in court from day to day at every day of pleading untill the plea be determined and judgment be thereupon given and also if it happen judgment in the same plea to be adjudged for the same W. Hamp against the said W. Denton would satisfie or render his body in execution to the prison of the said Lord the King of the Eleet upon that judgment which said sum of 20 l. the said R. acknowledged to be made out of his lands and chattles and which said summe of 40 l. the said Will. Denton acknowledged Recognizance enrolled c. as in others which said recognizance the said Justice with his owne hands delivered here in Court that same Terme to be inroled upon record T 28. H. 8. rot 328. View View was granted in a Writ de consuetudinibus and Servitiis M 2. and 3. P and M. rot 315. Norff. ss Alias writ of view awarded where the Sheriff retu ned upon the first writ of view that none of the Demandants would shew him the lands It was commanded the sheriff that justly c. he cause to be had to T. K. Knight the view of the mannors of B. B with the appurtenances which Geo. O. Esq in the Court of the Lord the King and the Lady the Queen here claymeth against him by Writ of the said Lady the Queene de ingru in le per And that he should say to 4. Knights who would be present at that view that they should be here at this day to wit tres Mich. to testifie the said view And now here at this day came aswell the said G. by I. C. his attorney as the said T. by P. P. his attorney And the sheriff to wit I. S now retorneth that none on the part of the said demandant came to shew the said sheriff the Mannors aforesaid and for that default he could by no meanes execute the execution and command of that Writ As that Writ in it selfe doth exact and require Therefore as before let the said Thomas have view of the Mannors aforesaid with the appurtenances the same day is given aswell to the said George as to the said Thomas here c. in Cr. Pur. and in the meane time c. THat the view ought to be examined in an assize and Wast and that there ought to be 6. Nota. Recognitors to have the veiw and that 4. of them be hundreders c. Venire Facias P 3. and 4. P. and M. rot 126. Whotly
that the moyety should be redelivered remayneth against the said I.N. thereof without defence Therefore it is considered that the said I. N. of the moneys received by the same I. aswell for the issues and profits of the moyetyes aforesaid as of the woods and under-woods aforesaid in the said moyety late growing by the same I. N. cut downe and sold should account with the said T. B. And also that the moyety of the Tenements aforesaid with the appurtenances should be redelivered to the said T. B. And hereupon the same T. B. prayeth a Writ of the Lord the King and of the Lady the Queen de Reliberand to the same T. B. the moyety aforesaid to the said sheriff of Warr. to be directed and it is granted him retornable in Cr. S. Martin c. Entry of a Venire facias direct d by the 〈◊〉 of the common Bench to the keeper of the Pallace of the Lord the King of West who is the warden of the Fleer to retuâ—ne a Iury of attornies of the Common Bench to inquire of all misdemeanours done in the same Court ss It was commanded the Keeper of the Pallace of the Lord the King of Westminster that he should cause to come before the Justices of the Lord the King of his Bench here the 29 day of November that same Term 12 attornies of the Court of the Common Bench here whereof every one of them should have 100 s. in lands Tenements or rent by the yeare at the least by whom the truth of the matter might be the better knowne to inquire upon theire oath of all Felonies Falsehoods rasures and deceits whatsoever in the court of the Lord the King here done or committed c. At which day W. B. Esquire keeper of the pallace aforesaid retorneth here a certaine Paunell with the names of the Jurors c. 16. of whom to wit W. K. c. are elected and sworne to inquire of and upon the premisses whreupon further day is given to them by the Court here to inquire of and upon the premisses here untill Cr. Pur. At which day here came the said Jurors And hereupon for certaine causes the Court here moving further day is given them by the court here to inquire of and upon the premisses untill tres Sept. Pas At which day here came the Jurors aforesaid who say upon their oath that whereas otherwise to wit in the Term of S Hillary An. Rs. nunc 17. before Io. Br. Knight and his associats then Justices of the Lord the King of the Common bench at Westminster one 1. Allen Knight prosecuted a certaine account of debt against Robert Hodgson late of Presentment made by the inquest of the attornies c. Gent upon demand of 20 l. And the same R. in the said Court by R Swinlow his attorney appearing in the defence by him made saith nothing in Bar of preclusion of the action of the said I. A. aforesaid for which it was then considered there that the same I. should recover against the said R. his debt aforesaid and his damages by occasion of the detayning of that debt as it appeareth in the same Term rot 325. and the same R. afterwards for that cause was put into the Hustings of London to be utlawed and for that cause afterwards was utlawed as it doth appeare in Trinity Term An. Rs. nunc 18. rot 260. and afterwards to wit 12. November An Rs. nunc 21 at Westminster in the county of Midd. in the Tresure-house there whereunto the records of the Lord the K. belong to the Common Bench under the custody of Geo. Roll Clearke of the Tresury aforesaid were kept these words or sayings to wit Wassan and Sinhowe by the procurement of the said Ro. Hodgson were rased to the intention to vacat and altogether to make null the utlawry aforesaid and of the same word or saying called Wassand was made warrand and of the same word or saying of the name of the attorney of the said Robert Hodgson called Swinhow the letter H. at the end of the same Writ was cased and abstracted and the letter H. was made the letter B. so that the name of his attorney on the plaint aforesaid by the procurement of the said Ro. Hodgson by reason of the said rasure now is Swinbowe in contempt of the Lord the King but who or whom rased that record the Jurors hithrto are altogether ignorant and hereupon the Jurors aforesaid have further day to inquire of and upon the premisses to wit untill the feast of St Iohn Baptist then next following c. At which day here came the Jury aforesaid and upon this day is further given to the Jury aforesaid to inquire of and upon the premisses here untill 15. Mich. then next following c. Withernam P 44. Eliz. rot 1201. ss It was commanded the sheriff Entry of pledges of new after withernam and warding of second deliverance and awarding of a writ ad Deliberan averia capt in Withernam upon an nonsuit beore appearance whereas W. H. bad been summoned to be in the Court of the Lady the Queene here to wit at Westminster to answer I K of a plea wherefore he took a certaine Oxe of the said I. and him unjustly detayned against sureties and pledges c. The same I. afterwards in the same Court of the Lady the Queen here to wit at Westminster made default by which it was considered in the same court of the said Lady the Qu. here that the same I and his pledges of prosecuting should be thereof in mercy And that the same W. should goe thereof without day and that he should have retorne of his Oxe aforesaid whereupon it was commanded to the same sheriff 30 H 8 Dier so 41. Pl 4 and fo 59. Pl 14 Pasch 27 Eliz rot 1134 entry of a w it of Capias in withernam in like case H. 19 7 rot 401. like entry P 44 Eliz. rot 1935 inter L and P and others that without delay he should make retorne of the said Oxe to the same W. And should not deliver him at the complaint of the said I. without a Writ of the said Lady the Queen that of the said judgment should make expresse mention And in asmuch c. he should make appare here in Cr. Pur. last past And the same sheriff to the Justices of the said Lord the King here at this day retorned that before the comming of the Writ aforesaid the said Oxe was inlarged by the same J. to places altogether to him unknown so that he could not make retorne of the Oxe aforesaid to the said W as by the said Writ to him is was commanded Therefore c. that of the cattle of the same I. to the value of the Oxe aforesaid before taken he should take in Withernam and should deliver them to the said W. to hold to him untill the Oxe aforesaid before taken could be retorned And that he should put by Sureties and
is thus contained Middlesex ss It was commanded the Sheriff whereas I L of the parish of Saint Bridget London Felt-maker R A of c. in the County of Surrey Felt-maker and W D in the parish of Saint Olave Southwark in the County of Surrey Felt-maker lately in the Court of the Lord the King now The condition of the Recognizance to wit in the Term of Saint M. Anno Regis Franc. Hiberniae c. 12. Scotiae 48. before Henry Hobart Knight and Baronet and his Associates then Justices c here to wit at Westminster did acknowledge and every of them doth acknowledge himself to owe to P. S. widow foure hundred pounds of lawfull mony of England which said summ of foure hundred pounds the same J. R. and W. for themselves and their heires Recovery against the principall would and granted and every of them willeth and granteth to be levied of their Lands and chattells and of every of them to be made and levied to the use and behoof of the said P under condition that if it should happen for the same Petro Nello against the said J. S late of London Felt-maker otherwise called c. in the same Court of Common Bench of the Lord the King here in a certain plea of debt upon demand of two hundred pounds by the same P against the same J. S in the same Court of the King here prosecuted to be given then the said J. S. shall satisfie the said Debt of two hundred pounds and also all damages by occasion of detaining of that debt against the same I. S. in the same Court of the King here to be recovered or adjudged or should render his body in Execution upon the same judgment in the Court of the Lord the King here And although the said P afterwards to wit in Hillary Terme Anno Regis nunc 12. Sup. in the same Court of the King here before the same Henry Hobart Knight and his Associates Breach of the condition that the principall had not paid the debt and damages nor rendred his body c. then Justices of the said Lord the King of Common Bench here to wit at Westminster by the consideration of the same Court recovered against the same I. S. as well the said Debt of two hundred pounds as fifty three shillings four pence which to the same P in the said Court of the King here were adjudged for his damages which he had by occasion of the detaining of that debt whereof he is convicted as by the Record and proceedings therein in the same Court of the Lord the King here to wit at W aforesaid remaining manifestly appeareth Neverthelesse the said I. S. the debt and damages aforesaid to the said P hath not yet paid nor rendred his body in execution upon the judgment aforesaid in the Court of the King here according to the Forme of the Recovery aforesaid as by the information of the said P is made known to the King And because c. that by honest c. he should make knowne to the said I. L. R. and W. that they should be here at this day to wit Quin. Pas to shew if any thing c. to wit the said I. L. wherefore the said 400 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged ought not to be made of his lands and chattells and the said Richard wherefore the said four hundred pounds by him in Forme aforesayd acknowledged ought not c. And the said Walter wherefore the sayd four hundred pounds by him in Forme aforesaid acknowledged c. and rendred to the same Petronell according to the Forme of the Recovery aforesaid Nihil returned upon the first Sci fac Alias Sci fac awarded T 19 Jac Rot Such a forme of entry of an alias Sci fac where the first Sci fac was returnable in another term Returned as before Judgment seve ally against the Manucaptors by default c. Entry of an alia Sci fac where the fi st Sci fac was returnable the same term T 19 Jac Rot 2089. See the form in another term and now here at this day came the same P by G.B. her Attorney and offered her selfe the fourth day against the same I. L. R. and W. in the plea aforesaid and they came not and the sheriff now returneth that they have nothing c. nor are found c Therefore as before it is commanded the sheriff that he make knowne to the said I.L.R. and W. that they should be here in Cr. Trin to shew in Forme aforesaid c. And now here at this day to wit to the said Cr. Tri. came the same P. by her Attorney aforesaid and offered her selfe the 4th day against the said I. L. R and W. of the plea aforesaid And the sheriff as before now returneth that they have nothing c. neither are found c. Therefore it is considered that the said P have execution against the said I. L. for the said 400 l. by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged and against the said R A of the said 400 l. by him in form aforesaid acknowledged and against the said VV D of the said 400. pounds by him in Form aforesaid acknowledged by default c. T 19. Jacobi Rotulo 4840. Brownlow ss Middelsex ss entry of Scire fac against Manucaptors upon a Bayle re Cr. Trin. And now here at this day to wit at the same Cr. Trin came the same Plaintiff by his attorney aforesaid and offered himself the 4. th day against the said Defendant in plea aforesaid And he solemnly called came not And the Sheriff retorned a Nihil Therefore as before it is commanded the sheriff that by honest c. he make known to the said defendant that he be here Tres Tri. to shew in forme aforesaid c. And now here at this day to wit at the same Tres Tri. came the said plaintiff by his attorney aforesaid and the said Defendant the 4th day of the plea being solemnly called came not and the sheriff as before retorneth nichil habet c. Therefore it is considered c. as in others Entry of a Sci fac upon a recovery in dower for value of the damages against the Ter-tenant Recitall of the judgment ss M 44. and 45. Eliz. Rot. 405. Otherwise as it appeareth in the Term of S. Michael An. Eliz. 44 and 45 Rot. 743. It is thus contayned Norff. ss It was commanded the sheriff whereas W G and M. his wife who was the wife of R. B. lately in the court of the Lady the Queen now to wit in Easter Term An. Regni 43. before E. A. Knight and his associates then Justices of the said Lady the Queen of the bench here to wit at Westminster by the consideration of the same Court had recovered against T. B. 45 l. 10 s. which to the same W. and M. in the said court of the Lady the Qu. here were adjudged aswell for the value