and Assigns all those Messuages Cottages Lands Tenements Pastures Feedings and Hereditaments whatsoever situate lying and being in K. and S. or any other Town in the said County of Norfolk which are Copy-hold or customary Lands holden of the Manor of H. within the said County of Norfolk and which the said T. P. holdeth by Copy of Court-Roll of the Manor aforesaid or of right ought to hold as Copy-hold or of some customary Tenure of the said Manor of H. or of the Lord or Lords thereof or of any other Manor or Lordship now or late of the said A. B. and E. B. or either of them and the Free-hold of all and singular the said Messuages Cottages Lands Tenements Pastures Feedings and Hereditaments whatsoever with the Appurtenances and also all the Freehold of the Inheritance of all those Copy-hold and customary Messuages Cottages Lands Tenements and Hereditaments whatsoever which were surrendred lately by J. G. unto the use of the said T. P. and his Heirs and also all such Rents and Arrearages of Rents Services Suits and other Demands whatsoever which now or at any time heretofore have been due or payable or that shall or ought to be hereafter due payable or done for all or any of the said Messuages Cottages Lands Tenements Pastures Feedings and Hereditaments whatsoever all which said Messuages Cottages Lands Tenements Pastures Feedings and Hereditaments with the Appurtenances were late in the occupation of c. and the Reversion and Reversions Remainder and Remainders of all and singular the Premisses all Rents and Reservations reserved or payable by or upon any Demises Leases or Grants heretofore made or granted of the said Premisses or any part or parcel thereof To have and to hold all and singular the said Messuages Cottages Lands Pastures Feedings and Hereditaments and all and singular the above-mentioned or intended to be hereby granted and bargained Premisses with their and every of their Appurtenances unto the said T. P. R. S. and T. P. their Heirs and Assigns to the only proper and absolute use and behoof of them the said T. P. R. S. and T. P. their Heirs and Assigns for ever and the said A. B. and E. B. for themselves and every of them their and either of their Heirs Executors and Administrators and every of them do covenant and grant to and with the said T. P. R. S. and T. P. their Heirs Executors and Assigns and every of them by these presents in manner and form following That is to say that they the said A. B. and E. B. or one of them are or is at the time of the sealing and delivery of these presents lawfully joyntly or solely seized in their or one of their Demesns as of Fee of and in the said Manor of H. and of and in all and singular the said bargained Premisses and every part and parcel thereof with the Appurtenances of a good perfect and absolute Estate of Inheritance in Fee-simple without c. and unto the use of them or one of their Heirs and Assigns without any manner of Condition power of Revocation Limitation of Use or Uses Trust or other matter or thing whatsoever to alter change charge incumber impeach determine or make void the same And that they the said A. B. and E. B. or one of them have or hath at the time of the sealing and delivery of these presents and at the time of the execution of the first Estate hereby to be made and granted shall have full Power good Right and lawful Authority to Grant Bargain and Sell all and every the said Messuages Cottages Lands Tenements Pastures Feedings Hereditaments and Premisses before-mentioned to be hereby granted bargained and sold with their and every of their Appurtenances unto the said T. P. R. S. and T. P. their Heirs and Assigns in manner and form aforesaid and according to the effect of these presents And also that all and every the said afore-mentioned to be hereby granted and bargained Messuages Cottages Lands Tenements Pastures Feedings Hereditaments and Premisses and every part and parcel thereof now are and at all times hereafter shall and may be remain and continue unto the said T. P. R. S. and T. P. their Heirs and Assigns and every or any of them free and clear and freely and clearly acquitted exonerated and discharged or otherwise upon reasonable request well and sufficiently saved and kept harmless and indemnified by the said A. B. and E. B. their Heirs Executors or Administrators or some or one of them of and from all and all manner of former and other Gifts Grants Bargains Sales Estates Wills Entails Alienations Joyntures Right and Title of Dower Statutes Merchant and of the Staple Judgments Executions Rents arrearages of Rents Mortgages and of and from all other Charges Titles Claims and Incumbrances whatsoever And farther the said A. B. and E. B. for themselves their Heirs Executors Administrators and Assigns and for every of them do covenant and grant to and with the said T. P. R. S. and T. P. their Heirs Executors and Administrators and every of them by these presents That they the said A. B. and E. B. and either of them their and either of their Heirs and Assigns lawfully having claiming or pretending to have or which hereafter shall or may lawfully claim or pretend to have any Estate Right Title Interest Claim or Demand of in or to the said bargained Premisses or of in or to any part or parcel thereof by from or under them the said A. B. and E. B. or either of them their or either of their Heirs and Assigns shall and will from time to time and at all times hereafter at the reasonable request costs and charges in the Law of the said T. P. R. S. and T. P. their Heirs and Assigns make do acknowledge or cause to be made done executed acknowledged and suffered all and every such farther act and acts thing and things devise and devises assurances and conveyances in the Law whatsoever of the said Premisses as by the said T. P. R. S. and T. P. their Heirs or Assigns their or any of their Councel Learned in the Law shall be reasonably advised or required be it by Fine or Feoffment Deed or Deeds Inrolled or not Inrolled Recovery or Recoveries with single double or more Voucher or Vouchers or by any other lawful ways or means whatsoever for the better assurance and sure making of the said bargained Premisses and every part and parcel thereof with their and every of their Appurtenances unto the said T. P. R. S. and T. P. their Heirs and Assigns for ever c. A Letter of Attorny to deliver seisin A Lease of Copy-hold Land with the Lords Licence recited This Indenture c. Between A. B. of c. of the one part and C. D. of c. of the other part Witnesseth That the said A. B. by virtue of a Licence before the sealing and delivery of these presents by him procured and obtained of
pleading we say such Lands or Tenements are demised and demisable A tempore cujus contrarij memoria hominum non existit And yet this Rule fails in the Kings Case vide supra It was said by Rolls Chief Justice in Pilkington and Bagshaw's Case Stiles 450. That a Custom cannot be urged for a thing that had its beginning since the time of Richard 1. if a Record can be shewed to the contrary But what measure of time shall make a Custom many differ Some judge it from the time of Henry 1. to the Stat. of Merton Cap. 8. which appointeth the Limitation in a Writ of Right and others say otherwise And by the Statute W. 1. the Limitation was from the time of R. 1. and these are Limitations as to Writs but this is since altered by 32 H. 8. What shall be said time out of memory which is reduced to sixty years next before the Teste of the Writ But the true measure is Littleton's Rule Where a Custom hath been used so long that man's Memory cannot remember the contrary that is when such a thing is pleaded that no man then living hath heard or known any proof to the contrary for if there be any sufficient proof of Record or Writing to the contrary albeit it exceed the memory of any man living yet it is within the memory of man and therefore regularly a man cannot prescribe or alledge a Custom against a Statute for that is the highest Record but affirmative Acts do not take away a Custom If Land hath been demised by Copy for fifty years and yet some alive remember the same occupied by Indenture this is not a good Copy hold And if Land hath been demised by 40 years by Copy and none alive can remember the same to be otherwise demised this is a good Copy But sixty or eighty or an hundred years may make a good Limitation Calthrop's Reading Coke Lit. 114 115. 2. Continuance Custom ought to have continuance without interruption time out of memory for if it be discontinued time out memory the Custom is gone As if a Copy-hold be let by the Lord for life or for years according to the course of the Common Law it shall never be demised as Copy-hold according to the Custom afterwards Consuetudo semel reprobata non potest amplius induci and as Continuance makes the Custom so discontinuance destroys it The Continuance for fifty years is enough to fasten customary Conditions upon the Land against the Lord And per Cur. Though the original Commencement and the customary Interest did commence 10 H. 8. from which time sixty years passed yet the seizure for a Forfeiture in the mean time interrupted utterly the Continuance from the time which might by the Law have perfected the customary Interest What shall be said an interruption of a customary Estate or not Within the time of forty seven years a customary Interest cannot be Attached upon the Land 3 Leon. 107. Tavernor and Cromwel If the Lord of a Manor is seized of an ancient Copy-hold for Forfeiture or by Escheat and let the same at Will without Copy for divers years this is not any interruption of the customary nature of the Land but that he may grant it again by Copy Ibid. Interruption If customary Land hath been of ancient time grantable in Fee and now of late times for the space of forty years the Lord hath granted the same for Life only yet he may if he please resort to his ancient Custom and grant it in Fee 1 Leon. p. 56. Kemp and Carter Customary Land within a Manor hath been grantable in Fee and it Escheats the Lord may grant the same to another for Life for the Custom which enables him to grant in Fee shall enable him to grant for Life and after the death of Tenant pur vie the Lord may grant the same again in Fee for the grant for Life was not any interruption of the Custom 1 Leon. 56. id Case 3. Certainty Custom ought to be certain for incerta pro nullis habentur 13 Ed. 3. Fitzh dum fuit infra aetatem 3. A Writ of Dum fuit infra aetatem was brought against an Infant the Tenant pleads a Custom That when the Infant is within such an Age as that he may count twelve Pence or measure an Ell of Cloth that then his Feoffment shall be good this Custom is adjudged void for the incertainty Why an uncertain Custom shall be void Now the Reasons why an uncertain Custom shall be void are 1. Because an uncertain thing may not be continued time out of memory 2. A man cannot prescribe in a thing which may not at the beginning be well granted and an uncertain thing cannot well commence by Grant And if Tenants of a Manor prescribe that they ought not to pay for a Fine to renew their Copy-hold Estates more than the Rent of two years but ought to pay the Rent for two years or less this is not a good Prescription for the uncertainty for sometimes they are to pay two years Rent and sometimes less 2 Rolls Abridg. 264 265. Green and Berry 4. Reason Custom must be reasonable therefore it must not be against common Right or purely against the Law of the Land as is Littleton's Case The Lord prescibes That there hath been a Custom within his Manor that every Tenant who marries his Daughter without Licence of the Lord shall make Fine c. This Prescription is void it is against the freedom of a Freeman who is not bound thereto by particular Tenure Alit if it be upon a special Reservation of Gift of Lands or Tenure in Villanage Lit. Sect. 209. So in Sect. 212. To prescribe that the Lord of the Manor hath used to distrain Cattel Damage feasant and to retain the Distress till Fine were made to him for the Damages at his will This Prescription is void for it s against reason a man should be Judge in his own Cause If the Lord will prescribe to have of every Copy-holder belonging to his Manor for every Court he keepeth a certain Sum of Mony this is a void Prescription because it is not according to common Right for he ought to do it gratis for Justice sake But if the Lord Prescribe to have a certain Fee of his Tenants for keeping an extraordinary Court which is purchased only for the benefit of some particular Tenants to take up their Copy-holds and such like this is a good Prescription and according to common Right Coke Cop. 81. But now to distinguish what Customs are unreasonable and what not observe these differences Every Custom is not unreasonable which is contrary to a particular Rule or Maxim of the positive Law For its a Rule Consuetudo ex certa causa rationabili privat communem Legem As the Customs of Gavel-kind and Burrough English are against the Maxim of descent of Inheritance and the Maxim of Escheat as in Kent the Father to the Bough and
Per Cur. to take a Surrender and grant Land by Copy Act done by the Servant of a Deputy is not any judicial Act and the admitting of a Copy-holder is not any judicial Act for there need not be any Suitors there who are Judges and such a Court may be holden out of the Precincts of the Manor Per Cur. the Grant is good What Court may be held out of the Manor especially if the Lord of the Manor agree to it afterwards 1 Leon. 288. Lord Dacres's Case One is made Steward ad exequendum per se vel sufficien ' deputatum suum J. S. makes A. his Deputy hac vice to take a Surrender ad ulterius faciend c. it s a good deputation and though the authority was to take the Surrender absolute and he takes a Surrender upon a Condition yet its good by reason of these words Et ad ulterius faciend Cro. Eliz. p. 48. Burdets's Case The Kings Copy-holder is attainted of Felony whereby his Copy-hold Escheats the Steward may grant this over ex officio without any especial Grant yet it s his duty before he does it to inform the Lord Chancellor Treasurer and Barons 4 Rep. 30. Harris and Jay Surrender by a Deputy Steward not according to his Warrant Stewardship was granted to A. to execute the Office per se vel sufficien ' Deputat suum A. made a Deputation to M. ad capiend unam sursum redditionem of one J. W. and J. his Wife and to examine J. ea intentione that the said J. W. and J. might take back an Estate for their Lives the remainder over to J. B. in Fee M. took two several Surrenders from the Husband and Wife the remainder to J. B. in Fee upon condition to pay a certain Sum of mony c. Per Cur. The proceedings are well warranted by the Deputation aforesaid 1 Leon. p. 289. Burgess and Foster I can conceive this to be the same Case as the former and one will well help to explain the other If the Surrender and Re-grant is entred in the Roll of the Court dated to be holdâ—â— the second day of May and the Deputation bears date the third day of June after Per. Cur. This misentry of the date of the Court shall not prejudice the Party for this Entry is not matter of Record Vide ibid. The Kings Auditor and Surveyor for the County of N. appointed a Steward for one of the Manors illa vice The Kings Auditor and Surveyor cannot appoint a Steward hac vice He kept Court and granted Copy-hold c. their appointment is not good they have no authority to appoint Stewards the one being to take Accounts the other to survey Land and the Grant is void Things of necessity done by one who is but in a reputed Authority is good if they come in by presentment from the Jury or of necessity are good as the admittance of an Heir upon a presentment or admittance by a Surrender to an Use But acts voluntary Things of necessity by a reputed Steward good not acts voluntary as Grant of a Copy-hold is not good If the Steward diminish the ancient Rents and Services it s a void Copy If a Lord command a Steward that he shall not grant such Land by Copy Lord countermands a Steward if he grant it it is void Cro. El. 699. Harris and Jay 4 Rep. 38. mesme Case They ought to have Letters Patents of the Office of Steward Infant not to be Steward Infant is not capable of the Stewardship of a Manor March p. 41. Copy-holder moved the Court That the Steward might be ordered to bring in the Court Rolls to enable him to defend his Title but the Court denied it Stiles 128. Baron and Feme Copy-holder in right of his Wife surrender out of Court into the Hands of the Steward and she was examined by him and it was not proved that he was Steward by Patent Though it is not proved he is Steward by Patent c. yet Surrender out of Court into his Hands is good nor any special Custom to warrant it yet Per Cur. it was good Cro. Jac. p. 526. Smithson and Cage Declaration Pro Senescallo Cur. Maner ' impedit de Officio unde ei conces pro vita Rast Ent. 5.9 Co. 42. 1 Br. 192. Hern 232. CAP. XI What things way be granted by Copy Of Grants by the Lord legitimus Dominus pro tempore Disseisor Infant And in respect of the Lords person or Estate what shall be good or not Of Grants by the King Lord. VVho shall be said a Lord sufficient to grant Copies VVhat amounts to a Grant at what place to be granted Of Grants by the Copy-holder to the Lord. A Manor may be granted by Copy Câ— Lit. 58. b. i. e. a customary Manor and so a Manor may be parcel of another Manor Generally all Lands and Tenements with in the Manor and whatsoever concerneth Lands and Tenements may be granted by Copy as a Fair appendant to a Manor may be granted by Copy Co. Lit. 58 b. Underwoods without the Soyl may be granted by Copy to one and his Heirs and so may the Herbage or Vesture of Land The Lord granted to one and his Heirs subboscum in M. Wood annuatim succidend by four or five Acres at the least and then made a Lease of the Manor The Lessee cut Trees Copy-holder brought Trespass Lessee justifies with averment That he had left sufficient for the Copy-holder to cut down by four or five Acres yearly 1. Per Cur. Order of direction not of instruction Underwood may be granted by Copy if the Custom permit it 2. That the whole Wood passed and the words annuatm succidend is an Order only appointed for the cutting it and not to restrain the Grant More n. 480. Taylor and Hoe and Cro. El. 413. The Market of Crokeham in Sommersetshire is always demised by Copy 4 H. 6.21 cited in Hoe and Taylor 's Case More n. 480. and Cro. Eliz. 413. Hoe and Taylor The grant of Waste by Copy is void unless so granted time out of mind also were it good it would not bind the Successor in the Case of a Bishop 3 Keb. p. 124. Bishop of London and Rowe Tonsura Prati is grantable by Copy So Herbagia 1 Rolls Abr. 498. Of Grants by the Lord or voluntary Grants Copy-holder Copy-holds come to the Lord by Escheats Note or Forfeiture or Purchase What comes by Escheat or Forfeiture he may grant again H. 8. seized of a Manor in which are Copyholds Grants Copy-hold for Life generally It was a Quaere in March Rep. 206. Fulham's Case and not resolved whether this be a good Grant or not and Per Cur. The Grant is not void it never recites in any Grant of the King what is Copy-hold But the great Question was whether the Copy-hold was destroyed or not It was not there resolved but seems so But Downcliff and Minor's Case is
severance of the Copyhold from the Manor the Copy-hold is not destroyed but it is not parcel of the Manor now if one would alien this he cannot do it by Surrender for it s not parcel of the Manor neither can the Feoffee make Admittance for he is not Dominus but if such Copy-holder will alien there is no way but to have a Decree against him and his Heirs in Chancery and so to bind his person but by it the Interest of the Land is not bound 4 Rep. 24 25. By the Statute of 13 El. Cap. 7. Copy-hold Lands are to be sold by Deed Indented and Inrolled in any of his Majesties Courts of Record as other the Bankrupts Land but by the same Statute it is provided That all Persons to whom any such Sale shall be made shall before such time as they shall enter and take the Profit of the same agree and compound with the Lord of the Manor of whom the same shall be holden for such Fines or Incomes as heretofore hath been usual and accustomed to be yielded or paid therefore and upon every such Composition the Lord for the time being at the next Court to be holden at and for the said Manor shall not only grant to such Vendee upon request the same Copy or customary Lands or Tenements by Copy of Court Roll of the said Manors for such Estate or Interest as to them shall be sold and reserving the ancient Rents Customs and Services but also in the same Court admit them Tenants of the same Copy or customary Lands as other Copy-holders of the same Manor have been wont to be admitted as also to receive their Fealty accordingly Note Copy-hold Lands are within all the Statutes of Bankrupt Cro. Car. 550. Crisp and Plat. Title to a Copy-hold cannot be made by the Commissioners without Surrender or Admittance 1 Keb. 24. How and to what purpose such Estate Vests before Admittance Cro. Car. 569. In Parker and Bleke's Case it is adjudged That by Bargain and Sale made by the Commissioners of Bankrupts the Estate of the Copy-holder is vested in the Bargainee before Admittance though he may not enter and take the Profits till Admittance The Bargain and Sale binds the Copy-holder and bars his Estate and he is no Copy-holder after the Bargain and Sale enrolled And where the Bargainee is admitted by the Lord it shall have relation to the Bargain and Sale And where the Custom was That the Wife of a Copy-holder dying Tenant shall have a Life Estate it was adjudged the Copy-holder dying after the Bargain and Sale his Wife shall be barr'd of her Widows Estate A Bankrupt purchaseth a Copy-hold and the Tenant Surrenders into two Tenants Hands to the use of the Bankrupt and now he will not be admitted This may be sold by the Commissioners and the Vendee may pay the Admittance Of Surrender Now I shall treat of Surrenders then of Presentment and Admittance for that they make up but one Copy-hold Title First of Surrenders We have seen in the last Chapter how that in some Cases Copy-hold Lands may pass without Surrender Now In some few Cases a Surrender is sufficient without Admittance or Presentment Where Surrenders is sufficient without Admittance as if the Copy-holder Surrender to the Lords use there needs no Admittance And In some Cases Admittance will do without a Surrender Where Admittance is sufficient without a Surrender as if the Lord make a voluntary Grant of the Copy-hold in his hands no Surrender is needful but Admittance only But regularly Estates of Copy-hold must pass by Surrender and Admittance and if the Surrender be out of Court there must be a Presentment Of a Surrender in Court By what words a Surrender will pass It cannot well pass by any other word then sursum reddidit Surrender if it pass in the Court by the words Give Grant Bargain Sell this will not so pass it but the Heirs of the Copy-holder shall avoid it It is vocabulum artis as Warrantizare and some other Law words are What will amount to a Surrender in Court or not By Hobart in Hutton Rep. p. 81. What Words If a Copy-holder comes into Court and saith That he is weary of his Copy-hold and requests the Lord to take it that is a Surrender And by some if he come into the Court and desire the Lord to admit his Son into the Copy-hold this is a good Surrender to the use of the Son But if a Copy-holder comes into Court and saith He renounceth his Copy this is not any Surrender and if the Copy-holder say in the presence of any other Copy-holders He is content to Surrender to the use of J. S. This is not a good Surrender Any words in the Court that declare his intention of surrendring into the Lords Hands is good 3 Rep. 80. in Belfield's Case What Acts. It was agreed between the Lord of a Manor and J. S. That in Consideration of 5 l. paid to the Lord J. S. should enjoy the customary Lands for his Life and also of Alice his Wife durante viduitate and that J. S. should have election whether the said Lands should be assured to him and his Wife by Copy or by Bill c. and he chose by Bill which was made accordingly Per Cur. Here is a good Surrender of the said Lands and that for Life only 1 Leon. p. 191. Collman and Sir H. Portman's Case Cannot be surrendred but by actual Surrender If a Copy-holder in Fee takes the same Lands of the Lord by other Copy for Life this is not any Surrender or Determination of his Copy-hold Inheritance for a Copy-hold may not be surrendred but by actual Surrender in Court and not by a Surrender in Law 1 Rolls Abr. 501. Shepard and Adams But in 3 Bulst p. 80. Belfield and Adams its Reported thus Copy-holder in Fee comes into the Lord's Court and there takes a new Estate of his Copy-hold from the Lord to himself for his Life after to his Wife for Life and after to his Son for Life this was admitted a Surrender and so was the other Case in 1 Roll 501. In whom the Reversion after a particular Estate remains Postea 13 Jac. But the Reversion is in the Surrenderor no disposition having been made of it So in this Case this is not a giving up his Estate of Inheritance but only it shall enure by way of Surrender to the use of himself for Life after to the use of his Wife for Life and after to the use of his Son for Life But if a Copy-holder of Inheritance takes a Lease by Indenture for years by this his Copy-hold Estate is gone and this is a Surrender of his Inheritance in the other Case the Inheritance remains in him and is thus Reported by Rolls If a Copy-holder in Fee comes into Court Copy-holder by accepting of an Estate is not Estopt from claiming another Estate and accepts by Copy an
allowed Hetly p. 54. M. 3 Car. B. C. Davis and Fortescue Lord of the Manor made a Lease to two of the Copy-holders of the Court Baron for 200 years Lessees of Copy-hold and Court-Baron for 200 years what acts they may do saving to himself the other Demesns and Services the Lessees keep Court there and a Copy-holder surrenders to the Use of A. in Fee Per Cur. this is a good Copy the Court may well continue for that purpose as to Admittance of Copy-holders for otherwise every one of his own act may destroy his Copyholders Estate Cro. El. p. 394. Jackson and Neal and Lord Hatton's Case cited there If the Lord of a Manor grants a Copy-hold Who shall have the Rent rendring Rent praefato Domino at a certain time servitia de jure debita consueta his Heirs and Assigns after his death shall have this Rent this being reserved by a Copy 2 Rolls Abr. 450. Crisp and Fryar Copy-holder makes a Lease rendring Rent Avowry by the Lord for part of his Rent and after surrenders parcel to the Lord the Lord may avow on the Lessee for part of this Rent without alledging notice or attornment by him 1 Keb. 94. Blat and Mole vide The Lord may Distrain a Copy-holder for his Rent as well as Seize Quaere Distress if a man makes a Lease at will rendring Rent whether he may Distrain for this Rent 2 Brownl p. 279. Ravel and Downe Entry Acceptance of Rent The Lord after acceptance of Rent cannot enter upon the Lessee of a Copy-holder 1 Keb. 15. Whether the accustomed Rent be reserved upon a Lease by a Bishop Lord of the Manor Treacer was a Copy-hold Manor within the Manor of B. The Bishop of Exeter held both these Manors in the right of his Bishoprick the old accustomed Rent was 67 l. 1 s. 5 d. Hall Bishop demised these two Manors to P. for 99 years determinable upon three Lives reserving the old Rent P. assigns them over to N. except the Demesns of Treacer N. surrenders both Manors except Treacer The Bishop re-demiseth to him the said Manors except Treacer and one Farm more reserving the old Rent 67 l. 1 s. 5 d. Per Cur. this second Lease was good and the 67 l. 1 s. 5 d. was the old accustomed Rent within the Statute 1 El. Mod. Rep. 203. Thredneedle and Lynham Of Leases made by a Copy-holder and of Rents reserved thereupon vide Customs When Leases made by a Copy-holder for Years are a Forfeiture Vide sub Tit. Forfeiture Note Lease no disseisin A Copy-holders Lease is no Disseisin though it be a Forfeiture nor doth it alter the Estate of the Lord 2 Keb. 598. Note Lease not Assets Copy-holder made a Lease for years by License and Lessee dyed this shall not be accounted Assets in the hands of the Executors Quaere Nor be extended Popham 188. But if Copy-holder make a Lease for an year this is a Lease by the Common Law and not customary and shall be accounted Assets in the Hands of the Executors of the Lessee Popham 188. Yelv. What Leases shall be good or not in respect of Licence when it is persued or not Copy-holder may make a Lease for one year without Licence for that is warranted by the Law by the force of the general Custom of the Realm Lit. 234. and this shall be accounted Assets in the Hands of the Executors of the Lessee If the Lord give Licence to a Coph-holder for Life to let the Copy-hold for five years the Copy-holder may Lease this for three years for this is comprehended within the Licence inasmuch as he had given him Licence to let for more years M. 15 Jac. B. R. Woolridg and Bambridge adjudged upon a special Verdict so it was adjudged in the same Case Cro. Jac. 417. If the Lord give Licence to a Copy-holder for Life to Lease the Copy-hold for five years if the Copy-holder shall so long live and he lets this for five years generally without this limitation If he shall so long live yet this is a good pursuance of the Licence and so a good performance for the Lease is determinable by his death by a limitation in Law and therefore so much is implied by the Law as if he had made the actual limitation So is the Case of Hart and Arrowsmith Noy 121. the operation of Law made such a limitation to the Estate which he made i. e. if he shall live so long But if the Copy-holder had had an Estate in Fee it had been a Forfeiture to have made an absolute Lease because in this case he doth more than he was licenced to do Popham Rep. 105. A Lease not warranted by the Licence as to the commencement A. obtains a Licence in Court to let his Copy-hold for 21 years from Mich. last past he makes the Lease to begin at Christmass following Per Cur. this Lease 〈◊〉 not warranted by this Licence and so no Eject firmae lyes upon it Cro. El. p. 394. Jackson and Neal. Commencement When a Lease shall begin in point of computation and not in point of Interest Land is demised by Copy for three Lives successive and then a Lease is made for 30 years of the same Land to commence after the determination of the first Estate the Survivor dyes leaving a Widow who claims durante viduitate according to the Custom The Quaere was when this Lease shall begin if after the death of the Copy-holder or after the determination of the customary Estate in the Woman It shall commence presently in point of computation but not in point of interest till after the death of the Widow 2 Siderfin Clark and Caudle Capel and Stephens 1653. By Tenant in Tayl if warranted by the Stat. 32 H. 8. Arthur Copy-holder for Life surrenders to Sir Francis Knolls Knight Lord of the Manor in Tayl Reversion in the Crown Sir Francis makes a Lease for three Lives to commence from the day of the date and of the ancient Copy-hold Rent was reserved and more Three Questions were moved by the Jury 1. Per Cur. If this Land shall be said usually demised within the Statute 32 H. 8. being never demised before but by Copy And the Court ruled that so 2. If this Copy-hold Rent shall be said the ancient accustomed Rent within the Statute and ruled that so 3. Though an Herriot was not reserved in the new Lease which was payable by the Copy-hold Custom yet it was resolved that it was a good Lease within the Statute of 32 H. 8. if Livery was made after the day of the date Moor n. 1050. Banks and Brown The Land is accountable usually demisable when it is always demised it was Sir James Marvin's Case Tenant in Tayl lets a Copy-hold by Indenture rendring the same Rent as before it s a good Lease within the Statute of 32 H. 8. A Manor by Act of Parliament was Entayled to A. Wife of
the Lord M. with divers Remainders over with a Proviso That the Donees non facerent aliquid in nocumentum vel ex heredat haeredum suorum vel c. sed tantum pro junctura vel pro termino vitae vel pro annis vel ad voluntatem secundum consuetudinem manerij reddend antiquum redditum The said Manor consisted of divers free Rents amounting to 7 l. 15 s. Copy-hold Tenements held for Lives the customary Rent of which was 3 l. and Waste and Herriots The free Rents or Copy-hold Rents or Herriots were never devised before for Life or Years or otherwise A post mortem viri by Fine grants and renders the moiety of the Manor for 300 years rendring Rent amounting to the Free and Copy-hold Rents and 8 d. more payable at two Feasts whereas the ancient Rents were payable at four Per Cur. the Lease was void the Copy-holds ought to have been granted by Copy and not by Fine and the reservation at two days where the Rent was payable at four days before made the Grant void for its ad nocumentum haered and there can be no apportionment in that case for Copy-holds for Lives are uncertain and Herriots accidental When two Ferms are joyned together the entire Rent which is reserved out of both of them is a new Rent and not the accustomable Rent 5 Rep. 5. Lord Mountjoy's Case By whom made Ecclesiastical person If a Bishop let Copy-hold Land for Life rendring the ancient Rent it s not good because the Successor cannot Distrain the Copy-holder for Rent but if it be of a Manor to which a Copy-hold belongs its good Lit. Rep. 305. in Sheers Case Dean and Chapter of Worcester Lord of a Manor in jure Ecclesiae of which Manor H. G. was a Copy-holder for Life of Lands under the Rent of 8 s. 8 d. per annum payable Quarterly and Herriotable at the death of the Tenant the Copy-holds were by the Custom grantable for three Lives they demise the said Lands to H. G. and his Assigns for the Lives of R. J. and M. and the survivor of them renduring 8 s. 4 d. per annum at two Feasts Question was if this Lease were good or might be avoided by the Successor Per the Statute 13 Eliz. Cap. 10. It was resolved 1. The Lease was good though it was made pur auter vies and that the Occupants shall be punishable for Waste 2. Customary Demises are within this Law Customary demises are not in the Statute 13 Fl. cap. 10. for this Estate granted by Copy was in judgment of Law an Estate at Will and without doubt Lands which have been accustomed to be demised at will by those which have the Inheritance of the Land rendring rent are Lands accustomably let to Farm within the said Act. 3. The said Act of 13 El. doth not avoid the Lease if the accustomed yearly Rent or more be reserved and for that an Herriot is not a thing Annual nor a thing depending on the Rent it sufficeth if the Annual Rent be reserved 6 Rep. 37. Dean and Chapter of Worcesters Case Cro. Jac. 76. Baugh and Heyns mesme Case As to Leases by Bishops of Manors consisting of Copy-hold Lands and Services of Free-Tenants and reserving the ancient Rent vide 3 Keb. 372. Mod. Rep. 203. Threadneedle and Lynham Infant Copy-holder in Fee leaseth for years Infant without Licence by parcel rendring Rent Lease affirmed by acceptance at full Age he accepts the Rent being admitted to the Copy-hold and after ousts his Lessee Lessee brought Ejectment Judgment for the Lessee Per Cur. this Lease for years is no Disseisin to the Lord though it may be a Forfeiture and this Lease is not void but voidable and may be affirmed by acceptance Noy p. 92. Ashfield's Case Lach. p. 199. Vide Rolls Rep. 256. By a Copy-holder or Heir before Admittance vide Admittance As to Rents reserved Lands at Common Law and Copy-hold Lands are leased by one Indenture Lease of Free-hold and Copy-hold the Rent issues out of both rendring Rent the whole Rent shall issue out of the Lands at Common Law and not out of the Copy-hold But if a man leaseth Land part of which he hath by Disseisin rendring Rent there the Rent shall issue out of the whole Land and by the entry of the Disseisee the Rent shall be apportionted Moor n. 144. Term. Pasch 5 El. But the Law is not so for in Collins and Harding's Case Moor n. 723. the Judges were divided in Opinion about this very point But in Rolls 2 Abr. p. 426. it is resolved That this Rent shall issue out of the Copy-hold Land as well as out of the other Land for a Rent may be reserved out of the Copy-hold Land and this is such a thing to which one may resort for a Distress Collins and Harding's Case And this Case is farther Reported by Rolls 1 Abr. p. 234. If a man Lease for years Freehold Land and also Copy-hold Land by Licence of the Lord reserving a Rent and after grants the Reversion of the Free Land to another and the Lessee Attorn the Rent shall be apportioned for this waits upon the Reversion Rent apportioned vide Collins and Harding's Case also Reported in Cro. El. p. 600 622. The Rent issueth out of both and is not like to a Lease of Lands and Goods for all the Rent is there issuing out of the Lands and it is now in the Hands of the Grantee as one entire Reversion Pleading and he shall declare accordingly and although they be several Reversions yet he shall declare upon the truth of the matter Copy-holder by Licence of the Lord demised the same by Indenture to the Plaintiff for twenty years under the Rent of 25 l. per annum the Copy-holder surrenders the Reversion of the one moiety of the same Copy-hold to the Use of one N. W. to which he was admitted and then the Reversion of the other moiety to W. who was admitted Per Cur. the Surrender by the name of a Reversion is good though the Lease is by Indenture and not by Surrender Rent apportioned which if it had been so it had been derived directly out of the customary Estate for still it is the Lease of the Copy-holder and not of the Lord. Quaere if the Copy-holder in this case should forfeit his Estate the Lease would stand good against the Lord being by Licence And Per Cur. the Rent is to be divided by moyeties according to the halves of the Reversion and in this case it was resolved there needed no Attornment upon the Surrender for the Admittance settles the Estate Attornment Hobart 177. Swinnerton and Miller It was said by Hale Chief Justice That a Lease for years of Lands that are Copy-hold Lease of Copy-hold without taking notice that it was Copy-hold particularly without taking notice that this was Copy-hold this is good for the Rent of the Copy-holder and after
and how they differ What Customs for Harriots are good or not Where they shall be apportioned and by whose Acts. Who shall pay Harriot or not and the Pleadings CAP. XXVI What Statutes extend to Copy-hold Lands and within what Statutes Copy-hold Lands shall be contained by Construction of Law without express words and what not and therein how Copy-holds shall be barred by Fine and non-claim c. CAP. XXVII Of Embleaments Who shall have them the Lord or the Copy-holder CAP. XXVIII What shall be said a Disseisin as to Copy-hold Estates or not CAP. XXIX Of Actions and Suits What Actions may be brought by the Lord and what Actions may be brought by Copy-holders or their Executors against the Lord or against Strangers in respect to their Copy-hold Estates and Priviledges CAP. XXX Of Copy-holders being impleaded and impleadable in the Lords Court and a Faux Judgment in the Lords Court and how and where to be relieved CAP. XXXI Of Declarations of for and concerning Copy-hold Estates how to be brought and laid and Presidents in what Cases they have been brought CAP. XXXII Of Pleadings The general Rules of Pleading as to Copy-hold Estates The different Forms of Pleading Customs and Prescriptions Of Pleading in reference to Common belonging to Copy-hold and when to be pleaded by way of Custom or by way of Prescription The manner of Pleading when a Lease is to be answered which is set forth in the Avowry Where in pleading the Commencement of the Estate must be shewed and by whom granted or not And how a Licence must be pleaded by the Lessee Prescription of Copy-holder to be discharged of Tythes how to be pleaded Of Traverses when how and where to be taken Forms of Pleading of Surrenders Admittances Estates in Fee Tayl for Lives or Years Pleadings of Presentments and Grants Presidents of bars by Commons Woods Ways Inclosures Forfeitures and all other Pleadings necessary for the Copy-holder to set forth his Title or defend it CAP. XXXIV Evidence Tryal Issue What shall be a good Evidence to prove the Custom alledged or not What shall be tryed by the Jury and what by the Court Rolls Who may be admitted to give Evidence When Issue is taken upon a Surrender where to be tryed Venue CAP. XXXIV Of Special Verdicts Imperfect Custom not well found Failure of Prescription How the Custom must be found by the Jury Presidents of special Verdicts CAP. XXXV How and in what Cases Copy-holders have been relieved in Chancery Presidents of Conveyances respecting Copy-hold Estates and Presidents of Surrenders Grants Admittances Presentments Lex Custumaria OR A TREATISE OF Copy-hold ESTATES c. CAP. I. Of the Original and Nature of a Manor and of what it consists Of a Manor Real and by Reputation Of a Customary Manor Of Grants and Leases of Manors with respect to this Subject of Copy-holds and what shall be said Parcel of a Manor or what shall be said a Severance FOR the right understanding of the Law as to Copy-hold Estates it 's necessary to premise something of the Nature and Notion of a Manor upon which they depend as the Materia though Custom is the Form thereof And I shall say no more of Manors than what shall have a direct influence upon the Explication of the nature of Copy-hold Original of Manors As for the Original of Manors Take this brief Account out of Perkins 670. Horns Mirror Lib. 1. Cap. de Roy Alfred Fulbeck f. 18. Lambert verbo Thaine Bacon's Elements of the Law 41 42 c. The ancient Kings of this Realm who had all the Lands of England in Demesn that is in their own Hands or totally at their own disposal did grant a certain compass or circuit of Ground upon some great Personages with liberty to parcel out the Lands to other inferior Tenants reserving such Duties and Services as they thought fit with power to keep Courts where they might redress Misdemeanors within such their Precincts and decide Controversies of meum and tuum within their Jurisdictions these Lords and Noblemen performing such Services and paying and yielding such Rents as the said Kings by their Grants reserved These Grantees were called Barons and were such as came to Parliament and from thence it keeps the name of Court Baron to this day though in process of time by the Grants of such Barons these Lands and Manors came into the Hands of meaner Men by Purchase c. as it is at this day And according to this our Custom all Lands holden in Fee throughout France are divided into Feifs and Arrear-Feifs into Feifs or Knights Fees and Mesne Fees whereof the former are such as were granted by the King the second such as the Kings Feudatories do again grant to others Now by Justice Winch in his Argument in the Case of Rowles and Mason 2 Brownlow 195. Manors are divided into three sorts of Tenures 1. The first holds by Knight Service and this is for defence of the Lord. 2. The second holds by Socage and this is to Plow and Manure the Demesns of the Lord c. since turn'd into Rent 3. The third holds by base Tenure and these are at the will of the Lord and these were to do Services and some had greater Priviledges than others to encourage them to perform their Services as it is in Ireland at this day Out of these by length of time and Custom sprang up the Race of Copy-holders For the Name or Etymology of the word Manor Etymology some fancy it to be Manerium quasi Manurium from manuring the Ground and then it takes its Name either from the Lords Demesns which the Tenants are bound to Manure or from the Lands remaining in the Tenants hands and others with more probability think it to be derived from the French word Mesner to govern or guide because the Lord hath the government of the Tenants within his Jurisdiction But that I may come to the thing intended and to leave the flourishes of guess and fancy It is a Maxim common in our Books Of what a Manor consists Demesns what That a Manor consists of Demesns and Services As for the word Demesns Dominicum or Domainium it is taken it two senses It is most properly taken for those Lands which remain in the Kings hands and so all Subjects are excluded from being seized in Dominico and we have little of that now but ancient Demesn Lands which are such as were in the hands of King Edward the Confessor But in a sense less proper Demesn Lands may be said to be in the hands of an inferior Lord or Tenant and as my Lord Coke on Littleton f. observes the form of Pleading shews this difference for an inferior Lord or Tenant never pleads That he is seized in Dominico absolutely but qualified with this addition in dominico suo ut de feodo Pleading and the word Fee or Feif implies that his Estate is not absolute but depending on some superior Lord. So
that Copy-hold Land may well be parcel of the Demesns and the frank-Frank-tenements are resting in the Lord but indeed the customary Inheritance is in the Copy-holder and he shall plead That he is seized with this farther addition In Dominico suo ut de feodo secundum consuetudinem Manerij Services As for Services whether Corporeal Annual or Accidental they are Duties accrewing to the Lord by reason of his Seigniory And respecting Copy-holds I shall under their proper Titles hereafter speak of Herriots Forfeitures Amerciaments and Fines for not doing Suit and Service and the like It was ingeniously said by Doddridge in Herns and Strouds Case Latch 63. That no Case resembles a Manor more than a Rectory as a Manor is intire so is a Rectory and the Glebe Lands resemble the Demesns and the Tythes the Services If I let my Manor excepting the Demesns the Exception is void Winch p. 23. Description of a Manor The New Expositor of Law-Terms describes a Manor as a thing compounded of divers things as of an House Land Arable Pasture Meadow Wood Rent Advowson Court Baron and the like and this ought to be by long continuance of Time to the contrary whereof Man's Memory cannot occur So that a Manor consists of Demesns and Services Manor not made at this day and a Court Baron as Incident and this must be time out of Memory for a Manor cannot be made at this day because a Court Baron cannot now be made To a Manor a Court-Baron is incident and two Suitors at least and a Manor cannot be without a Court Baron and Suitors or Freeholders Two at the least for if all the Free-holds except one Escheat to the Lord or if he purchase all except one there his Manor is gone for that it cannot be a Manor without a Court Baron and a Court Baron cannot be holden but before Two Suitors at the least A Court Baron is incident to a Manor as a Court of Pye-powders to a Fair. By the Grant of a Manor cum pertinentijs the Court passeth and a Man cannot grant his Court but he may grant the Profits of his Court 1 Brownl 175. Browns Case Now though a Man cannot make a Manor at this day yet he may make Gifts in Tayl reserving a Tenure and Suit of Court Yet a Tenure may be created because though he may create a Tenure yet he may not create a Court and a Court cannot be but with a continuance time out of mind 35 H. 8. Broke Tenure 102. A Manor as I said before may not be made at this day neither by a common person The King cannot make a Manor or parcel of a Manor at this day nor by the King himself and the King cannot make a thing parcel of a Manor at this day as if he grants Lands to hold of him as of the Manor of Greenwich by a certain Rent this Rent is not parcel of the Manor Yet though a Seigniory or Appendancy cannot be made at this day yet if an Advowson be Appendant to a Manor Advowson appendant and the Lord grants part of the Manor with the Advowson to J. S. it is now Appendant to that part Cro. El. p. 39. Morris and Smith In truth Manors cannot at this day be created but by way of derivation as being derived out of an ancient Manor Manor by derivation or by act in Law as in the Case of Copartners Vide infra A Manor is entire A Manor is an entire thing and cannot be divided If the Lord will transfer over unto a Stranger the Services of all his Tenants and reserve unto himself the Demesns or if he will pass away the Demesns and reserve the Services Now in both Cases the Lord hath not a Manor really but nominally only and in reputation Manor in reputation and if I am disseised of a Manor and the disseisor sever the Demesns from the Services as it is 4 E. 4. I which have right ought to make my demand according to my right and not to take notice of his severance for to me it is a Manor still Manor in suspence If a Manor descendeth to Co-partners and they make partition and the entire Demesns are allotted to one and the entire Services to the other the Manor is now in suspence for neither hath a Manor but in name only but if part of the Demesns and part of the Services be allotted to each then they each of them have a real Manor 26 H. 4.8 6 Rep. 64. Sir Moyle Finch's Case To Explain this I shall cite a Case or two Joynt-tenants make partition of a Manor yet both keep but one Court If two Joynt-Tenants make partition this day of a Manor and each of them hath Demesns and Services yet each of them hath not a Manor nor can keep several Courts but must both keep one Court Croke El. p. 39. Morris's Case A. seized of a Manor whereof part of the Tenants were Freeholders and part Copy-holders had Issue two Daughters and dy'd the Daughters entred and made partition of the Demesns only but the Services of the Free-holders and Copy-holders remain'd in Common By the partition the Demesns are now become in gross and severed from the Manor and if partition be made of a Manor so as the Demesns be allotted to one Sister and the Services to another now the Manor is dissolved or rather suspended Manor suspended and revived yet if the other Sister dyes without Issue and her part descendeth to the other now it is become a Manor again 1 Leon. p. 204. Thetford's Case By this you see we read in our Books of two sorts of Manors 1. A real and perfect Manor such as is before described 2. A nominal Manor a Manor by reputation A Manor nominal as you may see by several Instances before Some call it a Manor in gross as Manor in gross a man may have the Right and Interest of a Court Baron with the Perquisites thereunto belonging but this is improperly called a Manor in a strict sense and another may have the Scite and every Foot of Land thereunto belonging And as to this I will only cite a Case which refers to practice 6 Rep. 64 65. Sir Moyle Finch's Case Reputation is sufficient to pass a thing in a Conveyance by the name of a Manor Manor in reputation will pass by the name of a Manor in a Conveyance not in a Fine which is not re vera a Manor yet it ought to be in truth and not reputation which ought to challenge and hold Priviledge of a Manor as to have a Court Baron c. But a Manor in reputation which is not in truth a Manor will not pass by the name of a Manor in a Fine or Common Recovery for they shall not be taken by intendment Croke Eliz. 524. Mallet's Case Of Customary Manors A customary Manor may be held by Copy and such customary
4. Rep. 29. Bunting and Lepingwel 5. Copy-hold ought to be dimissa dimissibilis as it is in Murrels Case 4 Rep. vide infra Tit. Custom Yet this Rule is not Infallible For if a Copy-hold Land be in the hand of a Subject who is after preferred to Dignity Royal the Copy-hold is extinct for it is below the Majesty of a King to perform servile Services and yet after his Decease the next who hath right shall be admitted and the Tenure shall be revived in him 2 Siderfin 82. CAP. III. Priviledges of Copy-hold Estates 1. Priviledges of the Lord. 2. Of the Tenant 3. Priviledges of Infants Copy-holders 4. Of Copy-holds in respect of the Kings Prerogative and Priviledge BEfore I come to Treat farther of Copy-holds I thought it might not be amiss to set down the Priviledges of Copy-holders and Lords and Prerogative of the King that so the Student being well setled in these they need not be mentioned or explicated hereafter though they may lye here and there scattered in the following Cases Priviledges of the Lord. The Lord may upon Seizure of a Copy-hold maintain an Ejectment till the Heir come to be admitted 1 Keb. 287. Pateson and Danges The King shall not have the custody of the Land that the Ideot holds by Copy The Lord to have the custody of an Ideot for this is no more than an Estate at Will at Common Law and if the King should have the custody of the Land he would much prejudice the Lord. Yet alienation made of it by the Ideot after Office found shall be avoided Coke 4 Rep. 126. Beverly's Case Copy-hold Lands granted to three for the Lives of two if the Tenants pur auter vie dye Living cesty que vie the Lord shall have it for there shall no be Occupancy 1 Rolls Abridg. 511. Ven and Howel's Case No Occupancy The Lord shall have the custody and not the Prochein Amy. The Copy-holder is surdus mutus the Lord shall have the Custody and not the Prochein Amy for otherwise he should be prejudiced in his Rents and Services Cro. Jac. 105. Evers and Skinner The Lord is Chancellor in his own Court to dispose of the Estate when the Tenant leaves it uncertain Vide infra sub Tit. Customs in reference to Estates sparsim per tout If a Copy-holder surrender to the use of one and the Lord refuseth to admit him no Action of the Case lyeth against him so if such Copy-holder prays the Lord to hold a Court and he refuseth Where a Surrender is to be made to a Tenant of the Manor if he will not take such Surrender yet no Action of the Case lyes against him 1 Rolls Abr. 108. In what capacity the Lord stands in reference to the Copy-holder's Estate He is an Instrument of Conveyance upon Surrenders and a Conveyer himself upon voluntary Grants He is Chancellor in his own Court and may proceed by Bill vide infra Of the Priviledges of Copy-holders In this Chapter I shall sum up some general Priviledges of Copy-holders which lye scattered in the several Customs hereafter treated of A Copy-holder may make a Lease for a year without Licence of the Lord vide Lease Lease Copy-holders of a Manor may have Solam separalem pasturam in the Soyl of the Lord Sola separalis pastura and exclude him 2 Sanders 326 327 328. If a man be obliged in a Statute Staple Stat. Staple Elegit his Copy-hold Land is not extendible but aliter upon a Statute of Bankrupts vide Tit. Grant It s not extendible upon Elegit If a Copy-holder Lease for years by Licence of the Lord this is not extendible in the Hands of the Lessee Rolls Abr. 888. Picto's Case Copy-holder of Inheritance may dig for Mines in his Land So the Parson in his Glebe as it seems Siderfin p. 152. The Lord of Rutland against Gee per Hobart and Warburton Copy-holder may dig for Marle without any danger of Forfeiture Digging for Marle but he ought to lay the said Marle upon the same Copy-hold Land Winch p. 8. A Custom is that the Lord of a Manor may dig for Coals and open Mines in the Land of his Copy-holder Coals It was made a doubt in Goodrick and Gascoin's Case if Lessee of the Manor may have this liberty and whether such liberty can pass by Grant of the Manor without special words Latch p. 189. A Copy-holder may hedge and enclose but not where it was never enclosed before Winch p. 8. Note a difference between Priviledges which are annexed to the Seigniory and Priviledges annexed to the Tenancy The first the Lord may destroy but not the last Therefore If Tenant at Will be Out-lawed his Estate is determined Outlawry but a Copy-hold is not forfeited or determined by Outlawry Lit. Rep. 234. cited to be adjudged in 44 Eliz. Yet vide 1 Leon. p. 99. Where a Copy-holder is Outlawed the King shall have the Profits of his Copy-hold Lands and the Lord hath not any remedy for the Rent If the King grants a Manor in which are Copy-holders in Fee-farm Fee-Farm Rent the Lands or Goods of the Copy-holders are not liable to the Fee-farm Rent although the Free-hold is for the Copy-holders are elder than the Rent being by Prescription So Rent by Prescription If the King had a Rent by Prescription out of the Manor in which there are Copy-holders if the King had not used to Levy this upon the Copy-holds it seems he cannot charge them forasmuch as they are in by Prescription also M. 12 Jac. B. 2 Rolls Abr. 157. Assets Copy-hold Inheritance shall not be Assets to charge the Heir Popham 188. Copy-holder makes a Lease for years by Licence and dyes this shall not be Assets in the Hands of his Executors Popham 188. Copy-holder shall have Ayd of the Lord where the right of the Seigniory comes in question upon the Issue taken Ayd 21 H. 6.37 But where he hath Ayd of a Bishop and after the King hath the Temporalties he shall not have Ayd of the King for so the Plaintiff may be perpetually delay'd 21 H. 6.37.39 Priviledge of Infants Copy-holders Or Resolutions concerning Infants in respect of Fines Admittances barring Estates and being bound by Customs or not Custom of a Manor is That if a Copy-hold descends to any man that Proclamation shall be made at three several Courts that he shall come in to be admitted Infant not comprehended within the Custom of coming in after three Proclamations and if he come not in it shall be a forfeiture to the Lord yet an Infant shall not be comprehended within this Custom for he by intendment of Law is not at discretion to make his Claim 8 Rep. 100. Letchford's Case It seems to be a Rule in Law An Infant cannot be protected by the Law by his non-age in any Case but where his Right which he had while an Infant and descended
to him might have been barr'd and interrupted by non-claim so in case of forfeiture the reason of the Rule is because the Law conceives he will have that knowledge to preserve his right when he is of full Age Carter's Rep. 86. in Smith and Painton's Case It was holden in Rumny and Eve's Case Not bound during his Minority to pray Admittance 1 Leon. p. 100 Pl. 128. If a Copy-holder dyeth his Heir within Age he is not bound to come into any Court during his non-age to pray admittance or to tender his Fine An Infant who surrenders his Copy-hold Land within Age may enter at his full Age Infant Surrenders he may enter at full Age. without being put to any Suit for it A Case cited in Popham 39. in Bullock and Dibler's Case Infant Copy-holder in Fee makes a Lease for years without Licence Infant shall not forfeit by making a Lease without Licence Acceptance at full Age makes it good to Lessee rendring Rent at full Age he accepts the Rent and after outs the Lessee Lessee brings Ejectment and Judgment for Lessee Per Cur. this Lease may be affirmed by acceptance and such a Forfeiture shall not bind an Infant 8 Rep. 44. Noy 92. Of Copy-holds and Copy-holders in respect of the King and his Prerogative Per Stat. 2 Ed. 6. Cap. 8. Copy-holders shall enjoy their Estates where the King is intituled by Office though they be not found by Inquisition The Statute of Chantries gives no Copy-hold Land to the King 1 Ed. 6.14 The Estates of the Kings Copy-holders confirmed by Decree in the Exchequer or Dutchy-Chamber shall be good according to the same Decree Stat. 7 Jac. Cap. 21. A Popish Recusant shall forfeit all his Copy-hold Land 35 Eliz. Cap. 2. Whether the King shall have the Copy-hold granted in Trust for an Alien It was a Question in Car. 1. between the King and Holland whether the King shall have a Copy-hold which is granted to one in Trust for an Alien The better Opinion seems to be that he shall Styles Rep. p. 20.37 75. Vide this Case Reported in Rolls 1. Abr. 194. Tit. Alien If an Alien Amy Purchase Copy-hold in Fee in the Name of J. S. in Trust for himself and his Heirs It was a great Question and much Argued whether the King shall have the Trust of this Copy-hold but no Opinion given as to this Point But the Trust being traversed and found for the King yet Judgment was given against the King because by the Inquisition by which this Trust and matter was found J. S. who was the person trusted and who had the Estate in Fee in the Law in him Where the King hath no possion by force of the Inquisition was put out of possession of it by the Inquisition where the Alien had but the Trust and no possession and therefore admitting that the Trust should have been given to the King yet the King may not have the possession by force of this but ought to have sued to have the Trust executed in a Court of Equity The King is seized of a Manor in Fee in which is a Copy-hold demisable at Will according to the Custom of the Manor The King demised this Copy-hold to J. G. for Life King need not recite in his Grant that it is Copy-hold by Letters Patents J. G. dyes The great Question was if it be destroyed or the King may grant it again by Copy Per Cur. 1. The King need not recite in the Grant that it is Copy-hold 24 H. 8.21 2. Copy-holder for Life dyes the King may regrant That after the Estate for Life determined the King may grant this House and Land again by Copy of Court Roll It is otherwise in the Case of a common person The Rule That a Custom is an entire thing and cannot be apportioned shall not bind the King although it do bind a Common person The Kings Gifts shall be taken favourably and not extended to two intents where there is no necessity for it Kings Grants favourably construed as there is not here and we are not here to intend a collateral intent and so the Copy-hold is not destroyed for the Law takes care to preserve the Inheritance of the King for his Successors and it may be a benefit to the King to have it continue Copy-hold viz. to have Common Stiles p. 266. Cremer and Burnet If a Bishop Tenant in Tayl for Life or Years le ts a Copy-hold yet this shall not bind the Successor Issue in Tayl or him in Reversion to grant this by Copy again neither shall it bind an Infant Lord of Manor and the Estates and Possessions of the King are in like manner under the protection of the Law And if this Copy-hold should be extinguished Extinguishment perhaps a common Appendant or Appurtenant would be lost 2 Rolls Abr. p. 197. mesme Case If the King grants a Manor in which are Copy-holders in Fee-farm the Lands or Goods of the Copy-holder are not lyable to the Fee-farm Rent although the Freehold is Fee-Farm Rent because the Copy-holders are elder than the Rent being by Prescription 2 Rolls Abridgment p. 157. Loss of Issues If the Lord of a Manor lose Issues being summoned upon a Jury Process shall issue out of the Exchequer to levy them upon the Lands of the Copy-holders Lessees for Life or Years for the loss of Issues lyes upon the Land as an inherent Servitude by the Law in whose Hands soever it comes 1 Rolls Abr. 157. Surrender to the King without other matter of Record A Surrender of a Copy-hold to the King Lord of a Manor was in Lee and Boothby's Case 1 Keb. 720. adjudged good without other matter of Record All the Demesn Lands The King grants all his Demesn Lands in W. his Copy-hold Lands shall not pass Aliter in a common person 1 Rep. 46. Alton Wood's Case CAP. IV. The Nature of Custom in general Maxims of Customs What things are requisite to make a good Custom Time out of Memory Explained What shall be said to be an Interruption of Custom or not The reasonableness of Customs how to be judged of Several particular Customs Ratione Loci Of Customs enabling and disabling Of Customs and Prescriptions their difference and the different manner of Pleading them The several sorts of Prescription and how Prescription to be made and when and when not and by whom And when a Custom shall be said to be pursued or not Custom The Nature of Custom in general A Custom which hath obtained the force of a Law is always said to be Jus non scriptum for it cannot be made or created either by Charter or by Parliament which are Acts reduced to Writing and are always matter of Record But being only matter of Fact and consisting in Use and Practice it can be recorded and registred no where but in the Memory of the People For a Custom taketh beginning and
groweth to perfection in this manner When a reasonable Act once done is found to be good and beneficial to the People and agreeable to their nature and disposition then do they use it and practise it again and again and so by often iteration and multiplication of the Act it becomes a Custom and being continued without interruption time out of mind it obtaineth the force of a Law So that Custom in the intendment of Law is such an Usage which hath obtained vim Legis and is revera a binding Law to such a particular place persons and things wherein it is concerned Davis's Preface to his Reports Custom then may be defined a reasonable Act iterated multiplied and continued by the People time out of mind Custom in some Cases alters the nature of Free-hold 5 Rep. 84. Pennyman's Case A fortiori of a Copy-hold Hetly p. 126 127. Turner and Hodges Consuetudo privat communem Legem Custom is a ground and need not be proved for the reason of every Custom cannot be shewed as it was said in Knightly and Spencer's Case But though Custom takes away Common Law yet Common Law corrects allows and disallows both Statute Law and Custom for if there be repugnancy in Statute or unreasonableness in Custom the Common Law disallows and rejects it as appears in Dr. Bonham's Case 8 Coke 27. Now Custom being the life and soul of Copy-hold Estates I shall in the next Chapter largely treat thereof in the full extent of it Maxims of Customs 1. A Custom shall in construction be taken strictly and shall not be extended beyond the words of it One intituled himself to a Copy-hold in this manner That within the Manor there is such a Custom that if one taketh to Wife any customary Tenant of the Manor in Fee and hath Issue by her if he over-live the said Wife he shall be Tenant by the Curtesie The Case was he married a Wife who at the time of the marriage had no Copy-hold but afterwards during the Coverture a Copy-hold descended to her It was held in Sir John Savages Case cited in Beal and Langly's Case 2 Leon p. 208. That no Tenancy by the Curtesie did accrew by the Custom which did not extend but where the Wife was a Copy-holder at the Marriage So a Custom was If a Copy-holder in Fee dyes having Issue Three Daughters the eldest shall have all The Case was A Purchaser of a Copy-hold dyes without Issue having many Sisters they shall be Câ—parceners for the Custom extends only to Daughters So Burrough English The middle Brother Purchaseth Lands and dyes sans Issue the eldest shall have it and not the youngest 2 Rolls Rep. 368. So a Custom which goes in bar or deprivation of an Estate shall be taken strictly Carter's Rep. 87 88. Yelv. p. 1. Baspool's Case Forfeiture of a Copy-hold for Life shall not forfeit the Remainder Custom was If any Copy-holder in Fee Surrender out of Court and the Cesty que use doth not come into Court to take his Copy-hold after three Proclamations then the Lord shall seize it as forfeited And if a Copy-holder in Fee surrender to the use of one for Life remainder over in Fee and Tenant for Life comes not in Court upon the Proclamations this shall not forfeit the remainder The Custom shall be taken strictly being in destruction of an Estate and it shall be intended only of a Tenant in Fee in possession and not in remainder 1 Rolls Abr. 568. Baspool and Long. And yet it shall not be taken literally always as in the common Case Custom to grant Lands in Fee-simple yet they may grant in Tayl for Life or Years but that stands upon this Rule Omne majus includit in se minus 2. Customs are to construed according to vulgar apprehension because Customs grow generally and are bred and brought up amongst the Lay-gents therefore they are called Vulgares Consuetudines and they shall be interpreted according to the most effectual operation of the Law Stiles 146. 3. Custom does not trench to things collateral to the Estate such as Entries for Conditions Copy-holder by Licence lets the Land for 60 years rendring Rent upon condition of re-entry Copy-holder surrenders to J. S. in Fee who demands the Rent which not being paid Enters His entry per Cur. is not good for Copy-hold Land is not within the Statute of Conditions nor the Surrender of such a Copy-hold such an Assignee as the Statute intends he being in only by Custom is not privy to the Lease made by the first Copy-holder nor in by him but may plead his Estate immediately under the Lord Yelv. p. 222. Brasier and Beal 4. When a Custom warrants a greater Estate it warrants a less The Custom was That Copy-hold Lands may be granted to any person in Fee-simple A Grant to one and the Heirs of his Body is within this Custom So a Grant for Life or Years And a Fee-simple includes all 4 Rep. 23. The Custom is to grant for one two or three Lives A Grant to one durante viduitate is good 4 Rep. 29. Down and Hopkins Cro. El. p. 323. mesme Case 5. Custom of a Manor cannot extend out of a Manor therefore it ought to appear in Pleading That the Locus in quo c. est infra Manerium Hobart p. 286. Roberts and Young 6. Custom may enlarge a Grant farther than Common Law as Sibi suis So to one and his Heirs by Custom may be restrained to particular Heirs 2 Keb. 158.174 7. If a Custom hath a reasonable commencement it may be good And therefore a Custom for Copy-holders to have solam separalem pasturam may have a reasonable commencement by voluntary Agreement of the Lord with his Copy-holders to induce them to hold their customary Estates at Will and bestow their pains and labour in improvement Sanders 2. p. 326 327. Robins and Hoskins Vide Vaughan Rep. North and Coe good reasons for the contrary Opinion 8. What may be claimed by Prescription may be good by Custom and what may have commencement by Grant may be claimed by Prescription 2 Sanders 326. 9. A Custom never extendeth to a thing newly created If there be a Custom within a Manor That for every House or Cottage two shillings Fine shall be paid now if the Tenant make two Houses of one he shall pay no Fine for the new made House But alteration of Rooms alters not the case in Prescription 10. Custom is an entire thing and cannot be apportioned yet this Rule shall not bind-the King Vide supra 11. Consuetudo semel reprobata non potest amplius induci As Continuance makes the Custom so Discontinuance destroys it Custom What things are requisite to make a good Custom Four things are required to make a good Custom Antiquity Continuance Certainty Reason 1. Antiquity Every Custom had a beginning although the Memory of man doth not extend to it And this is one of the grand Pillars of Copy-hold Estates Therefore in
in the possession in the right and Time Possession must be Longa continua pacifica Now observe a Title once gained by Custom or Prescription cannot be lost by interruption of the Possession for ten or twenty years but by interruption in the Right As if a man hath had a Rent or Common by Prescription unity of Possession of as high and perdurable Estate is an interruption in the Right Co. Lit. 114. b. And if a man hath Common by Prescription and takes a Lease of the Land for twenty years the Common is suspended for that time and after the years ended he may claim the Common again by Prescription 1. Personal Prescription and in that Inhabitants may Prescribe as for a Way or matter of Ease or Discharge Gateward's Case 2. Real Prescription and this is inherent to the Estate and this is where a man Prescribeth That he and all those whose Estate he hath c. Prescription as to the Estate of the Land and not to the Land it self 3. Local Prescription not as to Land but to the Estate and therefore the Custom was That the Copy-holder should have Common in the Waste of the Lord the Lord by Deed confirms to a Copy-holder to have to him and his Heirs with its Appurtenances The Question was whether his Copy-hold now being destroyed he shall have Common by the word Appurtenances Per Cur. the Common is extinct and not revived for this is a local Prescription not to the Land but only to the Estate and this proves well the words of the Prescription for the Copy-holder ought to Prescribe That every customary Tenant within the Manor c. So he hath his Common in respect that he is customary Tenant and this is in respect of the Estate which he hath by the Custom and not in respect of the Land 2 Brownl 210. Marsham and Hunter Copy-holder for Life cannot Prescribe against his Lord but Copy-holder in Fee may Copy-holder for Life may not Prescribe against his Lord. Copy-holder in Fee may and how for he hath the Copy-hold in nature of Land of Inheritance Stiles 233. Cage and Dod. Per Cur. a Copy-holder may Prescribe by an usitatum est against his Lord but against a Stranger he must Prescibe in the name of the Lord More n. 647. 6. Rep. 60. Copy-holder of Inheritance may Prescribe in the name of the Lord to be discharged of Tythes Noy p. 132. Copy-holders may not Prescribe against their own Lord omnino nor against any other but only in the name of their Lord and the manner of laying it is by a Custom when they claim any thing or profit out of the Lords Soyl vide Sanders 324 5 6. Hoskin and Roberts What shall be said a pursuance of a Custom or not If the Custom be That the Lord may Demises Copy-hold in Fee he may Demise them for Life Years or in Tayl for these Estates are included in a Fee which is greater 1 Roll. Abr. Staunton and Barns Cok. Lit. 52. Vide supra Maxims and Customs 4 Rep. 23. The Case of the Manor of Allesly in Warwickshire Solummodo how expounded If the Custom be That the Lord may solummodo Demise his Copy-hold Land in Fee yet the Lord may Demise this for Life or Years or in Tayl though there was never any such Estate made before for the word solummodo is not to be taken so strictly to restrain the Lord of this liberty which the Law gives upon the general Custom but that he had used solummodo to grant in Fee which doth not take away the liberty which the Law gives 1 Rolls Abr. 511. mesme Case Custom is to Grant for one two or three Lives a Grant to one durante viduitate is within the Custom for the Estate granted was less than the Custom warranted The Custom was That the Wife shall have the Land for term of her Life The Evidence was That the Custom was that she shall have it durante viduitate Per Cur. This Evidence doth not maintain the Custom 4 Rep. 30. Downe and Hopkin's Case A Grant to three for the Lives of two is within the Custom of three Lives If the Custom be That Copyholds may be granted for three Lives a Copy may be granted to three for the Lives of two within this Custom For it is no inconvenience to the Lord although it be pur auter vie for there shall be no occupancy of it but the Lord shall have it if the Tenants pur auter vie dye living cesty que vies and this is not a greater Estate than three Lives but lesser Rolls Abr. 511. Ven and Howel But to one for Life Remainder to another for Life c. is not good A Copy-holder where the Custom was to Demise for three Lives demised to one for Life the remainder to such an one as he should marry and the first Son of his Body resolved that both the remainders were void but the Estate for his own Life is good More n. 922. Webster and Allen. Custom is when any Tenant sells his Tenement three Proclamations shall be made the next Court day and if any of the Blood of the Vendor will give as much mony as the Vendor will he shall have it A Tenant in consideration of one hundred pounds in Mony and that the Vendee being his Physician had cured him sold it to him and the next of Blood at next Court offers a hundred pound yet he shall not have it for it was given partly for the other consideration and the Custom shall be for mony only 1 Rolls Abr. 568. So if he had sold it in consideration of a Lease for years and 1 d. ibid. CAP. V. Of particular Customs either enabling or disabling in respect of the Lord of the Tenant and of the Estate Limited or Leased and in respect of Discents WHAT particular Customs have been adjudged good or what not either enabling or disabling Customs Vide supra of Customs ratione loci And they may be considered in three respects Of the Lord. Of the Tenant Of the Estate 1. In respect of the Lord and his Priviledge The Wife of the Lord shall not be endowed against a Copy-holder for the title of Dower is not consummate before the death of her Husband Dower so as the title of the Copy-holder is paramount and compleated before the title of Dower Leon. 152. Waste The succeeding Lord shall not take advantage of Waste done in the time of the preceeding Lord 2 Siderfin p. 9. Chamberlain and Drake Vide infra Common A Custom That none shall put his Cattel into the Common before the Lord puts in his is not good Vide supra the Rules of Customs 1 Bulstr Earl of Northumberland vers Wheeler 21 Ed. 4. 28 b. Fine A Custom that a Copy-holder shall upon the change of every Lord pay a Fine is void Vide the Rules of Customs For the Lord may change his Manor every day Had it been that
his Heirs The Question was whether he should have Common still Per tot Cur. he should not Custom hath annexed the Common to his customary Estate which being determined and destroyed by his own act in making it a Freehold the Common is also destroyed and cannot continue without special words and the general words cum pertinentiis will not help Yelv. p. 190. Cro. Jac. 253. Marsham and Hunter's Case Noy 136. mesme Case This is a local Prescription not to the Land but to the Estate and this proves well the words of the Prescription for the Copy-holder ought to Prescribe That every customary Tenant within the Manor c. so he hath his Common in respect that he is a customary Tenant and this is in respect of the Estate which he hath by the Custom and not in respect of the Land So was the Case of Forth and Ward where a Copy holder had used to take Estovers to repair his Hedges and the Lord granted to him the Freehold of the Copy-hold by the words of Grant unto him all the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments thereunto appertaining and thereto used and occupied It was resolved he should not have Common in the Land of the Lord 2 Brownl 209. Marsham and Hunter More n. 866. Forth and Ward the words cum pertinent do not create a Common A Copy-holder claims Common in another man's Land and the Lord Enfeoffs the Copy-holder of his Copy-hold Land he hath now lost his Common But if a Copy-holder hath Common in the Lords Wastes and the Lord Enfeoffs him of the Copy-hold with all his Commons the Common is not gone 1 Brownl 173. Lee and Edwards And all Pastures and Common whatsoever to the said Messuage or Tenement belonging or used or demised with the same and it his intent that a like Common shall be granted 2 Anderson 168. Wolredg's Case Abbot of F. was was seized of a Manor and there was a Prescription for Common in the Waste of the Manor as belonging to every Ancient Tenement King H. 8. granted the Manor to Sir J. G. which came to Sir T. G. who was Plaintiff in Trespass The Defendant justifies by an usitatum fuit That it had been there used time out mind that every Tenant for years of an Ancient Tenement and Close within the said Manor used to have Common of Turbary on the Waste of the said Manor and that the Tenement and Close he now hath is an Ancient Tenement and was granted to him with all Common appurtenant to the said Messuage and Close accepted or reputed as part parcel or member of the same And the Question upon a special Verdict was when the Lord of a Manor is seized of a Waste and a Tenant of an ancient Tenement prescribes to have Common in the Waste of the Lord afterwards the Tenement is severed from the Manor and granted for a Term to the Defendant with all Common appurtenant to the said Messuage and Close whether this Common that was before belonging to this Ancient Tenement shall pass to the Grantee Per Cur. This Prescription as it is here laid with an usitatum fuit Pleading by an usitatum fuit annexed to the Estate of a Termor is not good is not good It was agreed That if a Copy-holder doth purchase the Inheritance of his Copy-hold and afterwards grants this with all Commons belonging to the same The Common that was before used with the Copy-hold shall pass to the Grantee but the Pleading here is not good The beginning of this Common was by Grant and by permission of the Lord and this for the advancement of his Tenant and not by Prescription and no remedy he hath for this but only in Equity Per Williams a Termor may prescribe but not in his own name but in the name of his Lord That he hath had for himself and his Farmers c Had it been laid here with all Commons Profits used occupied and enjoyed with the Tenement by the Farmers this with an averment had been good but not as it is here the Grant is here with the usitatum fuit now here the usitatum est is annexed to the Estate of the Termor which is not good 1 Bulstr 17 18. 7 Jac. Grimes and Peacock 2 Brownl 222. mesme Case Lessee for years cannot alledge an Usage for every usitatum ought to go in one self same current not interrupted as in the Case of a Copy-hold but it might pass by apt words It was pleaded That all the Inhabitants in such an ancient Messuage ratione commorantiae Pleading Common ratione commorantie have used to have Common of Pasture in loco in quo c. 't is ill for in this word Inhabitants is included he which hath no Interest but Habitation only and he that hath no Interest cannot have Common 6 Rep. Gateward's Case My Lord Hobart's Reason is good Common is an Interest which must inhere in somebody and cannot be pleaded by way of Custom for the Inhabitants that are not permanent to prescribe Tenants in Fee must prescribe for Common c. in their own name and others that have Interest as for Life Years by Elegit at Will c. in the name of the Lord Gateward's Case 6 Rep. It was a Question in Roberts and Hoskin's Case Modern Rep. 74. and 2 Keb. 757. Sanders p. 324. Sola separalis pastura excluding the Lord is a good Custom Vaughan 251. North and Coe Whether a Custom for the customary Tenants to have solam separalem pasturam excluding the Lord were a good Custom Per Cur. it is notwithstanding this Prescription for the sole Pasture yet the Soil is the Lords and he hath Mines Trees c. And my Lord Coke is express in the point a man cannot Prescribe for sole Common but for sole Pasture he may As for the manner of pleading it Vide the Books cited Customs as to devising by last Will and Testament Vide infra Surrender to the use of 〈◊〉 mans last Will. CAP. IX Of custumary Incidents or collateral Qualities Of Copy-hold Estates and how to 〈◊〉 governed With the Illustration of seven particular Cases YOU may observe what has been beforâ— treated about the nature of Copy-hold Estates that amongst the rest of the Consâ—derations in that Chapter where the Copy-hold Estate is inheritable and the Land discendible That in such Case the Law shall direcâ— the descent according to the Rules and Maâ—ims of the Common Law as incidents to everâ— Estate descendible as it was in the Case of Uses When they had gained the reputation of Inheritances descendible the Common Law directed the descent of them and that there should be a possessio fratris of them as well as of other Inheritances So it is in Copy-hold Inheritances possessio fratris facit sororem esse haeredem Vide prius sub titulo Maxims But now such customary Inheritances shall not have by the Law any other collateral Qualities which do not concern descents of Inheritance which other
Inheritances at the Common Law have unless it be by Custom for though they are Estates of Inheritance according to the Custom yet they are not Estates of Inheritance simpliciter that is to have all collateral Qualities as Estates in Fee-simple have but only such which Custom hath setled and allowed 4 Rep. 22. Brown's Case And accordingly my Lord Hobart in Cox and Darsen's Case p. 215. c. saith The collateral Incidents of Estates as Dower Tenancy by the Curtesie Wardship c. are not without special Custom And therefore Copy-hold Inheritance shall not be Assets to charge the Heir in an Action of Debt upon Bond made by his Father Copy-hold Lands not Assets in the Heir tho' he has therein bound his Heirs neither shall the Wife of such customary Estate be indowed nor the Husband be Tenant by the Curtesie neither shall the descent of any such Estate toll the Entry of him that had customary Right c. But to explain this in these before-mentioned Qualities and others I shall Illustrate it by several Cases and Resolutions Dower The Wife shall have Dower of a Copy-hold by special Custom otherwise not and when she is to be endowed of a Copy-hold by the Custom then she shall have all the incidents to Dower as to recover Damages for the Profits from the death of her Husband by the Statute of Merton C. 1. De viduis 4 Rep. 30. Shaw and Tompson Tenant by the Curtesie and that without admittance of the Wife The Custom of a Manor was That if any man had a Wife who was a Copy-holder in Fee of the Manor and had Issue by her that he should be Tenant by the Curtesie of the Land A. a Copy-holder was seized and had Issue a Daughter who was married to J. S. who had Issue A. dyed his Wife entred the Wife dyed before admittance The Question was if by the Entry of the Husband without admittance of the Wife he should be Tenant by the Curtesie Per Cur. he shall the delay of the admittance of the Wife shall not prejudice the Husband being a third person More n. 425. Ever and Aston but if a Woman Copy-holder in Fee takes Husband who had Issue and the Wife dyes there the Husband shall not be Tenant by the Curtesie without special Custom 4 Rep. 22. Ryers Case Descent tolls not an Entry Discontinuance The Descent of a Copy-hold doth not toll an Entry 4 Rep. 22 23. Bullock and Dibly and 3 Rep. 9. You may see there where the Entry shall be congeable by the Issue after a Surrender or Lease by Licence of the Lord made by the Ancestor and shall not be a Discontinuance The Lord seized a Copy-hold without cause and grants it to another in Fee Grantee dyes seized and his Heir is admitted The first Copy-holder dyes his Heir enters and Surrenders to the use of a Stranger Per Cur. 1. Descent of a Copy-hold shall not take away the Entry of another Copy-holder who hath right 2. The Entry of the Heir without admission is lawful and being in his Surrender is good Cro. Jac. 36. Joyner and Lambert If one seized of Copy-hold Land in the Right of his Wife Surrender this to the use of another in Fee who is admitted accordingly the Husband dyes this is no discontinuance to the Wife nor her Heirs but the Wife may enter and not be put to her cui in vita nor her Heir to her sur cui in vita If Copy-holder for Life Surrender to the use of another in Fee this is no Forfeiture Surrender by Copy-holder for Life to one in Fee is no forfeiture for this passeth by Surrender to the Lord and not by Livery And Copy-hold Estates shall not have such qualities as Estates at Common Law have without special Custom 4 Rep. 4. Clun and Pearse and therefore where by Custom of the Manor But recovery by Pleint in a real Action shall be a discontinuance Pleints have been made in the Court of the Manor in the nature of real Actions That if a Recovery be in a Pleint in the nature of a real Action against a Tenant Copy-holder in Tayl it s adjudged that this shall be a discontinuance and shall take away the Entry of the Heir in Tayl for these Pleints in the nature of real Actions are warranted by the Custom this is an incident which the Law annexeth to the said Custom and such recovery shall be a discontinuance 4 Rep. 23. Deal and Rigden Having finished the Learning of Customs in order to the understanding of Copy-hold Estates it will be convenient to say something of the customary Tenant and of the Court and the Steward which shall be attempted briefly in the next Chapter CAP. X. The several sorts of Coph-holders and who shall be said to be customary Tenants Of Copy-hold Burrough-English Of the Court Two sorts of Courts Baron Of the Copy-holders Court. Who may keep Courts and to what purposes and where Of the Steward his Office and power of Deputation what he may do ex officio or not WE read of three kinds of Copy-holders in our Book I. Terra Nativa These were called Bond-Lands also because they held in Villenage II. Custumary And this was held by Free-Tenants III. Mensales As also Dominica because by this the Table of the Lord is maintained Some Copy-hold Land is called Poadland and some Molland a molli redditu where some small Rent was reserved There were two other manner of Copy-holds Old Aster and new Aster Aster signifies a Chimney those Copy-hold Lands which had had usually for a long time an House on them they called Old Aster Lands but those which of late had an House built on them they called New Asters And in old Records the Bastard Eigne did plead That he was Filius Askarius as much as to say Born in the House 2 Rolls Rep. 235. M. 20 Jac. B. R. Smith and Reynard Some Copy-hold Land is in the nature of Burrough-English Cro. Jac. 56. Curtis's Case Copy-hold Burrough-English And so shall descend to the youngest Son Some Copy-hold is of the nature of Burrough-English as well for the Brother as the Son Cro. Jac. 101. Whitton and Williams Between a Copy-hold in Burrough-English and a Freehold in Burrough-English there is not any difference as to descents Cro. Car. 411. Baron and Feme Copy holders for Life of Copy-hold of the nature of Burrough-English Reversion to the Husband in Fee he had Issue three Sons William George and Charles The Father dyed seized of this Reversion which descended to Charles Charles dies without Issue the Wife dyes Question was whether William Brother and Heir of Charles or George should have it Berkly and Bramston were for George because there being a Reversion expectant upon Estate for Life George shall take his Title from his Father and take by descent from him who had seisin of the Free-hold and not make mention of him who had the
more full to the purpose 1 Rolls Abr. 498. If the King be seized of a Manor whereof Blackacre is parcel and demisable by Copy in Fee Grant by the King good tho not recited to be Copy-hold and this comes to the King by Escheat or Surrender and after the King lets Blackacre to J. S. for Life not taking conusance that this was demisable by Copy this is a good Grant though the King recites not that this was demisable by Copy and by consequence this will destroy the power to grant this by Copy at any time after M. 15 Car. 2. Voluntary Grants by the Lord may be considered in respect of his Person Estate Disability oâ— person no hinderance to the Lord to grant As for his Person notwithstanding his disability yet his Grants of Copy-hold shall be good and valid in the Law as suppose he be an Infant Non compos mentis Lunatick Outlawed Excommunicate yet he is capable to make a voluntary Grant by Copy So a Feme Lady of a Manor takes Husband and they two joyn in a voluntary Grant by Copy this shall for ever bind the Wife and her Heirs and the reason is the Custom of the Manor being the main Foundation on which is built the whole Fabrick of the Copy-hold Estate what the Custom doth confirm to the Copy-holder the Law will ever allow and support it notwithstanding any such Imperfections in the Grantors person Co. Lit. f. 58. b. 8 Rep. 63. a. b. Swain's Case Noy p. 21. Grant by an Infant is good as well as presentation to a Benefice If the Lord release to a Copy-holder in Fee Habendum to him in Fee to the use of another this is a good use for upon such Release a Rent may be reserved 2 Rolls Abr. 788. Sams's Case What voluntary Grants by the Lord shall be good or not in respect of the Estate or Interest which he hath in the Manor and what not Voluntary Grants of Copy-hold Estates are of such as come to the Lords hands by Escheat or Forfeiture and the Lord may grant them by Copy again It was adjudged in Harris and Jay's Case Cro. El. 699. M. 41 El. B. R. That a Copy-hold Escheated and which hath been kept in the Lords hands divers years may be granted over by the Lord himself or by his Steward This may be considered in respect of the Quantity and Quality of his Estate He must be Legitimus Dominus a lawful Lord at the time of his voluntary Grant and then as to the quantity of his Estate in the Manor be it great or little is not material whether he be seized of or interested in the Manor in Fee or Tayl Dower or Curtesie for Life or Years Tenant per Statute Elegit or at Will or on Condition he may grant any Copy-hold Escheated to him for as long time as the Custom doth allow the Rents and Services being truly reserved and these Grants shall bind them that have the Inheritance or Freehold of the Manor the Reason is well delivered in Coke For a Copy-holder upon voluntary Grants made by Copy doth not derive his Estate out of the Lords Estate only for then the Copy-holders Estate should cease when the Lords Interest determineth but the Life of the Copyholders Estate is the Custom of the Manor and therefore whatsoever befalleth the Lords Interest in his Manor be it determined by course of time death forfeiture or other means yet if the Lord were Legitimus Dominus pro Tempore though his Estate in it be very small yet that is enough for the same Custom that fixeth a Copy-holder instantly in his Land upon his Admittance will likewise protect and support his Interest to the end in such manner that though the Lords Interest faileth yet the Copy-holders Interest shall not fall being upheld by such a Pillar unless he forfeit it by his own act Where Lord may augment the Rent and where not Where Copy-hold Land comes into the Hands of the Lord by Escheat or Forfeiture the Lord may grant this Land by Copy rendring greater Rent but not when he admits a Tenant Blewet Lord of a Manor wherein are many Copy-holders grants the Stewardship to S. for Life and after becomes a Lunatick and found upon Inquisition and thereupon commited W. to E. C. and others under the Seal of the Court of Wards The Lord Lunatick by his Steward may grant Copy-holds but the Committees by their Steward cannot c. The Question was whether the Committees by their Steward may grant Estates by Copy according to the Custom Per Cur. they cannot for by the Law they have no Estate in the Manor nor are Lords thereof for the time being but the Lunatick by his Steward may grant Copy holds and so it was decreed But it was ordered that the Steward should grant none without the privity of the Committees and warrant from the Court but this was only for caution Sir James Ley's Rep. f. 47. Blewit's Case Therefore if the Lord sever a Copy-hold from the Manor Severance from the Manor what it operates by granting the Inheritance to a Stranger now though one of the chief Pillars of a Copy-hold Estate is wanting viz. to be parcel of the Manor yet because the Land at the time of the Copy-holders admittance was customary and had this necessary incident this severance being a matter ex post facto and being the Lords own act shall not amount to the destruction of the Copy-hold There is this Custom in a Manor That every Copy-holder Tenant for Life had used to take all Trees growing upon his Land to be employed for Fuel and Repairs and Estovers Queen Eliz. being Seized of this Manor demiseth it to J. W. except Omnibus boscis subboscis arboribus maremiis Habend except pre-except for twenty one years who assigns all his Interest to J. P. and others Queen Eliz. dyes King James grants reversionem praed ac premissa sic ut prefertur except to A. F. R. S. and P. W. and their Heirs the Lessees Attorn A. F. and P. W. release to R. S. and his Heirs Lessees and their Steward c. grant to W. B. Def. a Messuage and a Vierge of Land whereon the Trees grew for term of Life secundum consuetudinem Manerij The Question was inasmuch as the Lessees hold the Court by virtue of the said Lease of the Manor out of which Lease the said Trees were excepted if the Def. the Grantee of the Lessees may take the Trees Per Cur. he may notwithstanding the Severance by the Exception and notwithstanding he comes in by Voluntary Grant and not by Surrender for the Estate of the Copy-holder which comes in by Voluntary Grant is not derived out of the Estate or Interest of the Lord of the Manor for he is but as an Instrument to make the Grant The Estate of the Copy-holder who comes in by voluntary Grant is not derived out of the Lord. but the Custom of the
Deed of Purchase of all Commons appertaining to his said Messuage Per Cur. The Common which he had in the Copy-Estate was extinct because the Common appertained to the customary Estate which is determined and because now he claims from the Lord in whom the Common may not stand divided from the Land and Soil of the Wood but had there been special words in the Grant of the like Common as he had in the Common Before the Surrender it had been good as a new Grant of the Common More n. 915.866 Fort and Ward By what words in Grants Copy-holds shall pass or not What shall pass by the words All the Demesn Lands King Ed. 6. by Patent granted omnes terras Dominicales Manerij de W. It was adjudged That customary Lands held by Copy parcel of the same Manor shall not pass and yet they are in the Law parcel of the Demesns of the Manor but in the Case of a common Person they shall pass by those words 1 Rep. 46. in Alton Wood's Case But if a man grant all his Demesn Lands his Copy-hold Lands will not pass if he had other Demesns to satisfie the words of the Grant 2 Rolls Rep. 236. And if I grant all my Lands and Tenements in D. my Copy-hold Lands there pass not because they cannot pass by any such assurance Owen Upon a special Verdict King H. 8. seized in Fee of the Manor of D. granted by his Letters Patents to Richard Andrews and Peter Temple in Fee Inter alia omnia Messuagia terras tenementa redditus reversiones servitia hereditamenta sua in D. subscripta viz. totum illum annualem redditum quindecim solidorum alia ser vitia exâ—untia de terris W. K. ac totum illud Messuagium 6 vergatas terrae in D. in tenura J. D. Habend tenend omnia predicta Messuagia terras tenementa redditus reversione servitia hereditamenta in D. pred to the said Richard Andrews and Peter Temple and their Heirs The Question was whether this was a good Patent to convey the said Lands of the said W. R. being a Copy-holder pur vie Per Cur. It was a void Patent to convey the Lands of the Copy-holder to them for there is not any Land granted but the Rents and Services of W. R. which is intended Freehold and there being none such the Grant is meerly void Cro. Car. 21. Castle and Hobbs By Hobart if the King grant you his Demesns you shall not have his Copy-holds in Waste and Pretty's Case Winch p. 3. What things shall pass by Grant of another thing as Appurtenant or Incident or not If there be a Common appendant to a Copy-hold Tenement Appurtenant and the Lord makes a Feoffment of the Tenement with all Profits Commodities and Common to this Appurtenant Yet the Feoffee shall not have any Common for this was Appurtenant to the Copy-hold and not to the Freehold 2 Rolls Abr. 61. So if he Lease the Copy-hold Tenements for years with such words as before yet Lessee shall not have any Common for the reason aforesaid ibid. What passeth or not by the words cum pertinentijs There being a Copy-hold Messuage called Symonds whereto divers Copy-hold Lands were appertaining the said Messuage called Symonds cum pertinentiis being surrendred to the Lord and all his rights therein It was moved whether by that surrender the Copy-hold Land shall pass or only the said House with the Orchards Yards and Curtelage And Per Cur. The Copy-hold Land shall not pass by these words cum Pertinentiis and in this it is all one in case of a Copy-hold as a Freehold Cro. Jac· p. 526. Smithson and Cage By Feoffment of the Manor Copy-holds pass 3 Keb. 456. Copy-holder had Common of Estovers in the Lords Wood appurtenant to his Copy-hold and he purchased the Inheritance of the Copy-hold Common and had the words in his Deed of all Commons appertaining the Common is extinct had there been special words aliter More n. 915.866 Vide supra Cum Pertin Copy-holder hath Common in the Wastes of the Lord the Lord by Deed confirms to a Copy-holder Hab. to him and his Heirs with the Appurtenances the Common is extinct for he hath his Common in respect as he is customary Tenant 2 Brownl 210. Marsham and Hunter CAP. XIII Of Surrenders The nature of a Surrender General Rules and Diversities for the better Explication Of the Alienation of Copy-hold Estates in general and of selling Copy-holds by Commissioners of Bankrupts in particular Of Surrender in Court. By what words a Surrender will pass What amounts to a Surrender Of a Surrender out of Court Who may take a Surrender out of Court What Surrender out of Court is good or not Of Surrenders The Nature of a Surrender A Surrender is a giving up of the Land by the Tenant to the Lord according to the Custom to the use of him that is to have the Estate and is entred in this manner The form thus according to Mr. Littleton Ad hanc curiam venit A. de B. sursum reddidit in ead curia unum Messuagium c. in manus Domini ad usum C. de D. Haeredum suorum vel Haeredum de corpore suo exeuntium vel pro termino vitae suae c. Et super hoc venit paerdictus C. de D. cepit de Domino in ead Curia Messuagium praed c. Habend tenend sibi haeredibus suis vel sibi haeredibus de corpore suo exeuntibus vel sibi ad terminum vitae c. Ad voluntatem Domini secundum consuetudinem manerij faciendo reddendo inde redditus servitia consuetudines inde prius debita consueta c. Et dat Domino pro fine c. Et fecit fidelitatem c. Note The Surrender to the Lord is general without expressing any Estate for that he is but an Instrument to admit Cesty que use for no more passeth to the Lord but to serve the Limitation of the Use and Cesty que use when he is admitted shall be in by him that made the Surrender and not by the Lord. And therefore if Copyholder in Fee Surrender to the use of another for Life nothing more passeth from him but what shall serve the Estate limited to use 9 Rep. 107. Podger's Case A Surrender is in nature of a Deed Poll rather than of an Indenture and enures by way of limitation of use 1 Sanders 151. If a Copy-holder Tenant Surrender to the use of himself Habend to him and his Wife and the Heirs of their Bodies it seems this is void for it is in nature of a Grant at Common Law for she was not named in the Premisses 2 Rolls Abr. 67. Brooks's Case Vide infra A Surrender is to this purpose that the Lord should not be a Stranger to his Tenant A Surrender is but a Conveyance by matter of Fact and no higher and
the Surrenderer should have a particular Estate in him without a Donor or Lessor which by the Rule of Law cannot be March Rep. 177. Bambridge and Whitton therefore Noy p. 152. is not Law Vid. 1 Roll Rep. 135. CAP. XV. Constructions of Surrenders as to Limitations of Remainders and Reversions Of Contingent Remainders Where the Heir shall be in by Descent or Purchase Of a Surrender to the Vse of ones last Will and how to be Construed Surrender upon Condition or Contingency Of Surrender before Admittance Surrender by whom to whom by Feme Covert Countermand of a Surrender What Remedy to force a Trustee to Surender Construction of Surrenders as to Reversion Remainder Limitation What shall be good to pass by the Name of a Reversion or not Surrender by the name of a Reversion COpy-holder by Licence of the Lord demised the Copy-hold to the Plaintiff for twenty years by Indenture rendring Rent the same Copy-holder surrendred the Reversion of the one moity to A. and of the other to B. and they were admitted Per Cur. The Surrender by the name of a Reversion was good in this Case though the Lease was not made by Surrender which had then been directly derived out of the customary Estate but by Indenture for it is still the Lease of the Copy-holder and not of the Lord and the Rent will be divided by moities Husband seized of Copy-hold Land in the right of his Wife who had the Fee surrendred the Copy-hold Land by the name of a Reversion after the death of the Husband and Wife the Surrender is void for by that pretence there shall be a particular Estate left in the Wife and also in the Husband One cannot leave a particular Estate in himself whereas the Husband had nothing before which cannot be And when one is seized in Fee he cannot by any matter in Fact give away the Inheritance after his death and so leave a particular Estate in himself Peradventure by matter of Record he may Cro. Eliz. p. 29. Clamp's Case Copy-holder in Fee by Licence of the Lord 15 Feb. 4 Jac. makes a Lease for sixty years rendring Rent and the Lease was to commence at Michaelmass next ensuing Lessee enters and was possessed Postea scil 8. May the Copy-holder surrenders the Reversion to divers Uses the Grantee of the Reversion distrains for Rent this Grant of the Reversion seems not to be good the Surrender being made the 8th of May which was before the inception of the Lease perhaps if no day had been named it had been good Lit. Rep. 17 18. Surrender of a Reversion bears date before the inception of the Lease Mary Selby and Beck and Drewet's Case there cited A Feme Copy-holder in Fee comes into Court and offers to Surrender to J. S. in Fee but she desires to retain to her self an Estate for Life the Steward enters that she surrenders the Reversion of her Copy-hold to J. S. after her her death it s naught Vide Attornment supra Limitations in Remainder and Construction thereon and of Contingent Remainder Tenant for Life and he in Remainder of a Copy-hold he in Remainder surrenders his Remainder to the Use of Tenant for Life and after his decease to the Use of himself and his Wife the Estate limited to the Tenant for Life is void but the Estate limited to Baron and Feme is good by way of present Estate and not of Remainder 1 Sanders Rep. 150 151 152. So in Siderfin Remainder over good by way of Grant and doth not depend upon a particular void Estate p. 360. Copy-holder in Remainder surrenders to a Copy-holder for Life Remainder over this Remainder over is good by way of grant in the Estate limited to the Tenant for Life because he had an Estate in it for his Life before and therefore it was argued That the Remainder limited after this particular Estate which is void in its creation are void also But Per Cur. the intent was that Husband and Wife shall have the Land joynly for their Lives in possession after the death of Tenant for Life as by mediate Settlement A Surrender is rather in nature of a Deed Poll than of an Indenture and enures by way of limitation of Use ut res magis valeat Wade and Bath Fee upon a Fee upon a Contingency A Fee may be limited upon a Fee upon a collateral Contingent in Copy-hold Estates As if a man surrender a Copy-hold in Fee to the Use of J. S. and his Heirs who is an Infant and if J. S. dyes before the age of twenty one years or marriage then he surrenders this to the use of J. D. in Fee This is a good Remainder to D. upon the Contingent 2 Rolls 791. Simpson and Southwood It s made a Quaere in Stiles in the Argument of Pausley's Case If by the destruction of a particular Copy-hold a Contingent Remainder be destroyed Rolls conceived not because it doth not depend upon the particular Estate but ought to expect till the Remainder happen Stiles 251. and there is one in esse to take the particular Estate But it seems the Law to be contrary and that if the particular Estate be destroyed the Contingent Remainder is gone As to this A Surrender is to the Use of a Feme Covert the Remainder to the right Heirs of the Body of the Husband and Wife he in the Remainder shall not take till the Husband dyes for he which is to have this ought to be Heir of the Body of both 2 Rolls Abr. 415. Lane and Pannel A like Case as this is also Reported 3 Leon. p. 4. Copy-holder is surrendred to the Use of the Wife for Life the Remainder to the Use of the right Heirs of the Husband and Wife the Husband entred in the right of his Wife Per Cur. The Remainder is executed for a moiety presently in the Wife and the Husband was seised of that in the Right of his Wife and the Wife dying first her Heir shall have it but if the Husband had dyed first his Heir should have had one moiety But the Case of Lane and Pannel wherein was good Law and nicely argued is better Reported in 1 Rolls Rep. 238 317 438. The Case was this Lane was seized of a Copy-hold in Fee and having a Wife surrenders it to the Use of Dixon and the Wife for their Lives and after to the Use of the Heirs of the Body of the Husband and Wife and the Wife and Dixon are admitted to them and their Heirs and after Dixon surrenders his moiety to the Husband and Wife and their Heirs upon which they were admitted and afterwards they Surrender it to the Use of one Davis in Fee who was admitted then the Wife dyes having Issue and after the Husband dyes the Heir brings an Action of Trespass it s not maintainable The great Question was whether the Wife had an Estate Tayl executed vested in her Per Coke Whether
Therefore T. H. was Copy-holder in Fee and surrendred out of Court into the Hands of H. B. and W. J. two Copy-holders of the Manor to the Use of R. W. in Fee R. W. entred and paid the Rent to the Lord. T. H. who surrendred dyed H. B. and W. J. who took the Surrender are dead The Heir of T. H. entred R. W. re-enters Per Cur. By the Surrender into the Hands of two Tenants nothing passed until it was presented in Court and in the interim the Interest remains in him who made the Surrender which Interest descended to the Heir and the acceptance of the Rent by the hands of Cesty que use gives not any Interest unto him and there is no Estate in Cesty que use but an Inception until this Surrender be presented in Court But they held also That it was not of necessity that the Parties who took the Surrender should present it and although they are dead and the Party who made it is dead yet as the Custom is found if it be presented by any other Copy-holder when the Court is held it s well enough and he may be thereupon admitted Cro. Jac. 403. Froswel and Welch and so is Buntings's Case 4 Rep. so resolved And Cesty que use shall procure a Court to be held for his own advantage 1 Bulst 215. mesme Case Two Joynt-Tenants in Fee of a Copyhold Cesty que use to procure a Court to be held for his own advantage and one surrenders his part into the Hands of the Lord to the Use of his last Will and after deviseth this to another in Fee and dyes and after at the next Court this is presented the Devisee shall have it for now by relation the Joynture was severed and the Estate of the Land bound by the Surrender Constable's Case Rolls 1 Abr. 501. So Cro. 30 Jac. Mich. Porter's Case Custom for a Copy-holder to Devise and if the Will be not presented within a year and a day next after the Devise to be void they were several Customs and so differ from Peyrrman's Case Now suppose no Court be holden in that time Carter's Rep. 71 72 88. Smith and Painton It shall be presented at a Court within the year or at next Court after the year ended else it shall be void 5 Rep. 84. 2 Anderson 125. In Perryman's Case 5 Rep. 84. It is a Question what remedy if the Copy-holder will not present the Surrender made out of Court the Answer is Caveat emptor but certainly there is good remedy in Equity as in all Cases of Trustees or Instruments of Conveyance The Custom is That it should be presented at next Court otherwise it was void One surrenders his Copy-hold into the Hands of two Tenants out of Court upon condition of payment of Mony 25 July after to be void After he surrenders out of Court to the Use of J. S. the Mony was paid before the 25 of July Then he surrenders to the Use of a third person before the payment At the next Court the surrenders were presented Two Surrenders and the second Surrender presented first but not the first and the Lord grants Admittances severally to these two Persons Per Cur. The second Surrender was good for nothing by the Surrender out of Court was divested out of him that surrendred until the Surrender was presented but he was absolute Owner to bring Trespass or any other Action and then that not being presented and the second was presented the first Surrender was void and the second was good Jones 306. 1 Rol. Abr. 500 Burgis and Spurlin's Case Cro. Car. 273 283. mesme Case CAP. XVII Of Admittances upon Voluntary Grants Surrenders Descents By whom Admittances upon Surrender made shall bind In what Cases the Admittance of the one shall be the Admittance of another Of Admittance by Attorny Admittance where to be made Of Admittance upon Descent The time of Admittance What things the Heir may do or not do before Admittance In what Cases and to what purposes the Copy-hold Estate shall be in the Tenant and to what purposes not And what Leases c. made by them shall be good and in what Cases the Lord shall be compellable to make Admittances and where not Of Admittances on voluntary Grants NOTE a diversity between the Heir who comes in course by Descent and another Stranger who comes in by Surrender and hath these words Dominus concessit admissus est but when the Heir of a Copy-holder is to be Admitted he hath only these words Et admissus est Admittances are of three sorts upon a Voluntary Grant Surrender Descent As to voluntary Grants made by the Lord in some sense he may be said to be the absolute Owner of the Land and may dispose of it at his pleasure yet he is bound to observe the Custom of the Manor in his Grants neither can he alter the Estate or Tenure If the Custom doth warrant an Estate to a Woman durante viduitate only and the Lord admits for Life this shall not bind his Heir The Custom must be pursued So in Reservations according to the accustomable Rent the Lord must strictly pursue it as where he reserves 10 s. where the usual Rent was 20 s. So where the Rent has been accustomably paid at four Feasts and the Lord reserves it at two Feasts these are void So if two Copy-holds Escheat to the Lord the one of which hath been usually demised for 20 s. rent and the other for 10 s. and he granteth them both by Copy for 30 s. it s not good But in this kind of Surrender the Lord is not considered barely as an Instrument because he is not bound to dispose the Land but to whom he pleaseth yet he is an Instrument in respect he is tyed unto Custom but in the other sort of Surrender he is barely an Instrument Where to be made The Lord himself may grant or make Admittances out of the Manor at what place he pleaseth but so cannot the Steward 4. Rep. 26 and 27. Several Tenures and several Fines The Lord admits Tenenda per antiqua servitia inde prius debita de jure consueta And if the Tenures are several the Fines must be several In Westwick's Case 4 Rep. The Entry of the Roll was Ad hanc curiam venerunt Willielmus Westwick Johanna Uxor ejus ceperunt de Domino Tenementa praed cum pertin in quibus c. prefat Willielmo Westwick Johannae Uxori ejus Tenend eisdem Willielmo Johannae haeredibus suis c. When the Surrender was to the Use of William Westwick in Fee yet the Admittance shall enure only to the Husband The Admittance must be pursuant to the Surrender for the Lord can but make Admittance secundum formam offectum sursum redditionis de quo vide in Cap. Surrenders Cesty que use cannot surrender before Admittance and the Entry of the Surrenderer doth not make an
admit any other but him to whom it is limited and assigned by the Tenant who made such Forfeiture and the Lord cannot dispose of it otherwise And farther That if the Lord admit any other and after sells the Manor to a Stranger by whom Cesty que use is admitted Cesty que use hath a good Title and shall avoid all mean acts and dispositions made by the Lord as he should if a Surrender had been made to his Use ibid. Mr. Keble in the Reporting of this Case of Coply's 2.823 saith A Surrender is to the Lord to the intent quod inde faciat voluntatem yet by Custom the Surrenderer by Petition or Declaration may direct it to any person whatever and the Lord must pursue it and there is no Estate in the Lord but it remains in the Tenants hands till Admittance of such party and the Purchasor might come in at any time The Case of Taylor and Shaw in Carters Rep. 6 22. The like Custom is adjudged void but that was upon a fault in the special Verdict Tenant in Tayl of Copy-hold Lands the Jury find a Custom That this is to be barred by seizure of the Lord as a Forfeiture non alio modo and not otherwise as the Lord Chief Justice Bridgman well observed and that being naught the whole Custom is in vain As for his first Reason of such a Custom being void that its a precarious Custom you must have the concurrence of the Lord or you cannot do it and Custom implies Right though this is of weight yet it might have been objected in Pilkinton's Case and Grantham's Case yet in these Cases such Custom is adjudged good But his second Reason is cogent by this negative Custom you destroy that which is essential to the Estate If you will allow a customary Tayl you must allow a customary Recovery and so this Case differs from those others Now these ways of barring Entayled Copy-holds are in nature of a Recovery to dock the Entayl But Rolls Opinin in Stiles 450. Pilkington and Bagshaws Case is not Law he conceived there could be no such Custom to cut off Entayled Lands of Copy-hold by the Forfeiture and seizure of the Lord for his seizure upon the forfeiture destroys the Copy-hold Estate at Common Law Modus Conventio vincunt Legem And therefore It was made a Question in Dell and Heydon's Case If Tenant in Tayl of a Copy-hold Remainder in Fee is impleaded by plaint in a Court Baron in nature of a Writ of Entry in the Post The manner how and the reason why a Recovery shall bar a Copy-hold Estate and suffers a Common Recovery with Voucher whether if Tenant in Tayl dye sans issue this shall bind the Remainder Cro El. p. 372. But Rolls in 1 Abr. 506. in the same Case saith this may be barred by a Common Recovery for a warranty may be annexed upon this by a Surrender to an Use or by a confirmation or by Release with Warranty and it may be intended he shall have other Copy-hold in value And Sir Francis More in the Report of this Case saith if Tenenant in Tayl come in as Vouchee this is a bar to the Issues and Remainder Surrender with warranty to an Use and grant accordingly makes the party in the per by the Surrenderor and upon this Warranty the Surrenderor may be vouched and Recovery in value shall be only of other Copy-hold Lands in the Manor No. 488. and in 4 Rep. mesme Case it s adjudged that such Recovery shall make a Discontinuance and shall take away the Entry of the Heir in Tayl. If a Copy-holder surrenders in Tayl and the Heir of the Donee is to bring a Formedon he ought to count of a Gift made by the Copy-holder who surrendred and not by the Lord for he is but the Instrument to convey it and nothing passeth from him Cro. El. 361. Paulter and Cornhil And yet in the Case of Clun and Pease adjudged since Dell and Higden's Case Per totam Curiam A Recovery with common Voucher in a Plaint in nature of a Writ of Entry in Curia Manerij shall not bind the Issue in Tayl for it shall not bind but upon expectancy of a Recovery in value which is the reason it binds for Land at the Common Law and here he cannot have any Land in value neither at Common Law nor customary Land for if it should be so Conveyed the Lord should lose his Fine and one should hold his Land as a Copy-holder without Admittance or Grant from the Lord which is contrary to the nature of a Copy-hold but it s a Discontinuance clearly which cannot be defeated by Entry Cro. El. p. 391. Now as a Feoffment will not destroy a Copy-hold Estate Entayled so neither a Fine or Recovery at Common Law It doth not make any Discontinuance Copy-hold Estate how discontinued or not for these being Common Law Assurances they do not work upon the Assurance of the Copy-hold and that that doth not work upon the right of the Estate Tayl cannot make a Discontinuance And the same reason of a Fine which is but a Feoffment on Record and the same reason holds a Fine may work to the destruction of an Estate where it is not preserved by special Custom but this is preserved by special Custom so for a Recovery that that is in demand is the Free-hold True if the Recovery were in the Lords Court there the Estate may be turned to a Right and a Recovery at Common Law cannot bar a Copy-hold Estate because of the Recovery in value to which the Warranty is annexed doth not go according to the Copy-hold but according to the Freehold These being Common Law Assurances work only a Common Law Interest and cannot work upon a Copy-hold this is the Abstract of Glin's Argument in Taylor and Shaw's Case Carter's Rep. How Copy-hold barred by a Fine at Common Law But the Lord Chief Justice Bridgman in that Case put a nice difference as to the barring Entayled Copy by a Fine at Common Law if a Copy-hold be suspended while it is in suspence a Fine at Common Law bars it for one cannot be a Copy-holder in Tayl and have the Inheritance of Freehold in himself it must be suspended for a time as if he divide the Copy-hold from the Freehold for a time and he there gave a notable difference Difference as to what may pass by a Fine or be barred by a Fine where a man may pass a thing by a Fine and where he may bar by a Fine a right of Copy-hold cannot be passed by a Fine but may be barred by a Fine A man that hath a Rent-charge he levies a Fine of the Land the Rent-charge is gone by it yet the Fine is not levied of the Rent but of the Land as for his other Reason from the words of the Statute 32 H. 8 Of Lands any ways Entayled c. I conceive that cannot extend to Copy-hold Lands Carter's
Rep. 25 26. Where by the Custom Plaints have been made in the Court of the Manor in the nature of real Actions if such a Recovery be against Tenant in Tayl Copy-holder this shall be a Discontinuance and shall take away the Entry of the Heir in Tayl for they are warranted by Custom and it is an incident that the Law amounteth to the said Custom that such Recovery shall make a Discontinuance 4 Rep. 23. Deal and Rigden Discontinuance If a man seized of Copy-hold Land in right of his Wife surrender it to the Use of another in Fee who is admitted and the Husband dyes this is not any Discontinuance to the Wife nor to her Heirs but that she may enter and shall not be put to a cui in vita nor her Heir to a sur cui in vita 4 Rep. 23. Bullock and Dibler Yet Walmsly in Collins and Cranks Case Cro. Jac. 105. held it was a Discontinuance Quaere his Reason Surrender by Tenant Copy-holder in Tayl If Surrender make a Discontinuance makes not any Discontinuance except a special Custom be and then its a bar Vide prius and Cro. El. p. 148. Bulle's Case But in Cro. El. 717. Erishes Case That such a Surrender is a Discontinuance to put the Issue to his Action this being as strong as a Livery by Tenant in Tayl and the Alienee is in by the Tenant in Tayl though he comes in by Grant of the Lord 1 Leon. p. 95. Case 124. Knight and Footman there holden That the surrender of Copy-holder in Tayl to the Use of another in Fee doth not make any Discontinuance but the Issue in Tayl may enter and the Serjeants Case there cited to be so One under age surrenders and dyes having Issue A. A. may enter and shall not be put to his dum fuit infra aetatem 1 Leon. 95. Knights Case But it is setled That a Surrender makes not a Discontinuance Vide infra pres a pres A farther Discourse of what shall amount to a Discontinuance or not Vide hic Cap. supra If a Copy-holder in Tayl admitting it be an Entayl surrender to the Lord to make his Will and he re-grants this to the Copy holder this is not any Discontinuance although a Surrender to the Use of an Estranger should be admitted to be a Discontinuance for a surrender to the Lord may not make any Discontinuance forasmuch as he had the Reversion agreed upon Evidence at the Bar in Lee and Brown's Case Mich. 14 Jac. B. R. So a Surrender of a Copy-hold Entailed to certain Uses c. is no Discontinuance though the Court there said it had been a great Question but by a special Custom such surrender may be a Discontinuance Discontinuance to the Wife If the Husband seized of Copy-hold in the right of his Wife surrender this to the Use of another in Fee who is admitted accordingly Husband dyes this is not any Discontinuance to the Wife 4 Rep. 23. Bullock and Dibler's Case nor her Heirs but the Wife may enter and not be put to her cui in vita nor her Heir to a sur cui in vita A Discontinuance may be of a Copy-hold Entayl admitting it to be a Tayl as by a Recovery in a real Action in the Lords Court 4 Rep. 23 Deal's Case Quaere if it be not more properly a Bar for the time than a Discontinuance 1 Rolls Abr. 634. Morris's Case 44 Eliz. B. R. In Chard and Wyat's Case More n. 877. The Court were divided in Opinion whether a Surrender was a Discontinuance The Case was this A Copy-holder in Fee surrendred to the Use of his Will and having a Daughter born and his Wife with Child he devised by Will part of his Land to his Son or Daughter with which his Wife went haeredibus suis legitime procreat and the residue he devised to his Daughter born to have to her and the Fruit of her Body and if she dye without Fruit of her Body the same shall remain to the Child in the Mothers Belly and if both dye without Fruit then J. S. should sell the Land and willed the one Sister to be Heir to the other The Wife of the Devisor entred and was admitted and had a Daughter which afterward dyed the Mother took Husband and they surrendred Resolved 1st That this was a Fee Tayl in the Daughter 2ly That one in ventre sa mere could not take an Estate in possession by Purchase but in this Case she may take in Remainder But whether it were a Discontinuance the Court was divided but they all agreed a Copyhold may be Entayled by Custom and barr'd by Recovery by special Custom and yet in Moor n. 1087. afterwards it was adjudged a Surrender by a Tenant in Tayl of a Copy-hold was not a Discontinuance but by what is said before the Law is setled as to this point But to cite no more in this point where by Custom of the Manor Pleints have been made in the nature of real Actions That if a Recovery be in a Pleint in nature of a real Action against a Tenant Copy-holder in Tayl it s adjudged that this shall be a Discontinuance and shall take away the Entry of the Heir in Tayl for these Pleints are warranted by the Custom this is an incident which the Law annexeth to the said Custom 4 Rep. 23. Deal and Rigden CAP. XX. Of Leases of Copy-hold Estates Leases by the Lord and Rent reserved and his Remedy by Avowry And of Leases made by Copy-holders What is a Forfeiture or not When a Licence to make a Lease shall be said to be persued or not Commencement of a Lease Leases by whom made Bishop Tenant in Tayl. Infant Of Rents reserved What things are demisable by Copy Of Leases of Copy-hold Land Vide Title Customs as to Leases and Limitations of Estates supra Of Leases of Copy-hold Land made by the Lord Tenants 1. By the Lord and his Avowries and remedy for the Rent Lease of the Freehold of a Copy-hold THE Lord leaseth the Freehold of a Copy-hold to J. S. this is good betwixt J. S. and the Lord But the Lord cannot reserve the Rent upon such a Lease 1 Keb. 15. Gerrard's Case Custom A Custom That on payment of ten years Rent the Lord should Licence to let for 99 Years and if he refused the Tenant might do it without Licence was adjudged good and reasonable Grow and Bridges cited in 2 Keb. 344. Porphyry and Legingham If a man be seized of a Manor wherein are divers Copy-holders admittable for Life or for years Lord lets for Life he may Lease by Copy in Reversion to commence after the death of the first Copy-holder and he leaseth the Manor to another for term of Life the Lessor may make a Demise by Copy in Reversion to commence after the death of the first Copy-holder and that is good enough but the Custom of some Manors is to the contrary and that is
the Lease spent the Inheritance takes place and severs the Copy-hold from being granted by Copy after during the Lease but when that is spent it is well again Sir George Sand's Case cited in 3 Keb. p. 91. in Cholmly and Cooper's Case A. being a Copy-holder by Licence of the Lord leased his Copy-hold to Smith for years rendring Rent and afterwards by Deed granted the Rent to another Habend during the term c. to which grant the Lessee did Attorn and paid the Rent to the Grantee Per Gaudy the Grant is good but now it is but a Rent-seek Rent-seek the Grantee cannot have an Action of Debt for it for he is not party nor privy to the Contract nor hath the Reversion 1 Leon. 315. Austin and Smith Copy-holder makes a Lease for years How a Lease not warranted is good not according to the Custom of the Manor yet this Lease is good so as the Lessee may maintain an Ejectione firmae for between the Lessor and Lessee and all others except the Lord of the Manor the Lease is good Owen 17. Downingham's Case Of Leases made by those in Remainder or Reversion Tenant for Life By one in remainder by Parol the Remainder in Fee of a Copy-hold he in the Remainder makes a Lease by Parol Tenant for Life and he in Remainder joyn in a Surrender to the Use of him in the Remainder in Fee This is a good Lease and shall take effect in the life of Tenant for Life and it shall be good against him in Remainder for the Estate of Tenant for Life is extinct and cannot hinder the Lease to have operation like as he in Remainder grants a Rent-charge and after the Tenant pur vie surrenders the Rent shall commence presently Cro. El. p. 160. Dove and Williot A Lease for Life made in Reversion A Lease for Life may be made in Reversion of a Copy-holder according to Custom but whether such a Lease be void if made by Dean and Chapter per the Statute of 37 H. 8. which extends to all Colledges c. Quaere 1 Rolls Rep. 202. Long and Baker As to Remedy for Rents by Entry or Action Vide infra titulo What Statutes extends to Copy-hold Lands and sub titulo Actions and Suits What things are demisable by Copy Underwoods may be demised by Copy to one and his Heirs for this Underwood is a thing of Inheritance for after every cutting down they will grow again from the Stubbs Cro. El. 413. Hoe's Case Tythes may be demisable by Copy of Court Roll according to the Custom of the Manor for they may be parcel of a Manor as well as a Rent-charge Com. p. 43 Eliz. Sands and Drury Tonsura prati may be demisable by Copy of Court Roll according to the Custom of the Manor by Prescription per Gaudy Vide pluis supra Pleadings Custome quod tenens custumarius in feodo possit dimittere terras pro aliquo termino annorum sine Licentia Domini Cro. Entr. 123. Simile non excedens 21 annos Hern 81. CAP. XXI Of Licence What Licence shall be good By whom made shall bind or not Licence taken for a Confirmation When and where a Licence is to be pleaded specially and when and where not QUaere if Lessee for years may grant Licence to a Copy-holder to fell Timber To fell Timber The extent by Lessee how far good or not But though it be good against himself yet it is void against the Lessor because the Licence is derived out of the Interest and so can be of no greater extent than it and the Assignee of the Lessee may take advantage of it 1 Keb. 26. Muniface and Baker And by Twisden Where a Copy-holder hath Licence to fell though it were repealed by the Grant of the Lord of his Interest before the felling yet this is no Forfeiture though the Licence be determined by it ibid. Licence to make Leases Vide supra Leases The Lord Licenced his Copy-holder to make a Lease of his Copy-hold for 21 years Concurrent Lease to begin at Michaelmas following and he made a Lease accordingly by Indenture and also before Michaelmas by Deed made another Lease to another for 21 years to begin also at Michaelmas following Per Anderson The making of the second Lease was a Forfeiture the Licence is satisfied by the first Lease and so the second Lease is without Warrant and consequently a Forfeiture Lease void in Interest and good by Estoppel The second Lease is void in Interest and good by Estoppel If a Copy-holder make a Lease contrary to the Custom it is a forfeiture before the Entry of the Lessee Moor Case 329. Once a Licence to make a Lease and always If the Copy-holder make a Lease for years by Licence of the Lord the Lessee may assign this over or make an under-Lease without any new Licence for the Interest of the Lord was discharged by the first Licence 1 Rolls Rep. 509. Johnson and Smart What Licence shall be good and by whom by a Lord at will A Lord at Will of a Copy-hold Manor connot give Licence to a Copy-hold Tenant to make a Lease for years although that he may grant a Copy-hold for Life according to the Custom 1 Rolls Abr. 511. Petty and Debbans By Lord for Life Licence determinable If a Lord for Life of a Copy-hold Manor give Licence to a Tenant to make a Lease for years this Lease shall not continue longer than the Life of the Lord ibid. 2 Brownl p. 40. mesme Case Licence to make a Lease upon condition void Aliter upon a Limitation The Lord licenceth a Tenant to make a Lease upon Condition the Condition is void for the Lord giveth nothing by the Licence but doth only dispense with the forfeiture A Licence gives not a Right but only executes it but a Limitation to such a Licence is good as a Licence to let for two years he cannot Lease for three years Owen p. 73. Haddon and Arrowsmith If a Copy-holder makes a Lease for years by Licence of the Lord Copy-holder leaseth for years and dyes sans Heir if determined Licence taken for a confirfmation and dyes without Heir the year not expired Some say the Lord may enter for the Estate out of which this Lease was derived is detemined Yelv. contra This Licence shall be taken as a confirmation of the Lord and the Lease shall be good against him Popham 188. Pleadings When and Where a Licence is to be pleaded specially and when and where not In Ejectione Firmae brought by the Lessee of a Copy-holder it is sufficient that the Count be general without mentioning of the Licence if the Defendant plead Not Guilty then the Plaintiff ought to shew the Licence in Evidence But if the Defendant plead specially then the Plaintiff ought to plead the Licence certainly in his Replication and the time and place when it was made and in this Case the
Plaintiff replyed That the Copy-holder by Licence first then had of the Lord did demise and did not shew what Estate the Lord had nor the time and place when it was made it is not good for the Licence is traversable The Defendant cannot plead That the Plaintiff by Licence did not demise for this is a negative pregnant 2 Browl. 40. Petty and Evans Licentia dat ad dimittendas terras custumarias Co. Ent. 185. CAP. XXII Of Forfeitures What shall amount to a Forfeiture of a Copy-hold Estate by act of the Party by non-feazance or misfeazance Of refusal of Writ Services c. Non-Appearance at Courts Of making Leases not warranted Rent shall be said a Covenant and no Lease and so shall be no Forfeiture VVhat Alienation shall be a Forfeiture or not Of Forfeiture by wast in Trees By Attainder of the Tenant What act of the Husband shall forfeit the Wifes Land or not Who shall take advantage of a Forfeiture Where the Lord shall take advantage before a Presentment or not VVhere the Forfeiture of one Copy-holder shall be the Forfeiture of another as to Estates or Persons What is a dispensation of a Forfeiture and of what Forfeitures in the Life of the Ancestor the Heir shall take advantage Of Forfeitures What shall amount to a Forfeiture of a Copy-hold Estate BY act of the Party By Operatation of the Law What act of the Party respecting Non-Feazance Mis-Feazance Of refusal to pay Rent perform Services or Suit of Court when they shall be causes of Forfeitures or not A Copy-holder hath an Inheritance by Custom but when he doth that which is contrary to the Custom as to cut down Trees c. he shall then be in no better a condition than a bare Tenant at will and so it will be a Forfeiture If a Copy-holder be to pay a certain Rent yearly by his Copy to the Lord and the Lord comes upon the Land and demands the Rent at the day if the Copy-holder being present refuseth to pay it this is a Forfeiture but if in such Case the Copy-holder saith to the Lord he hath not his Rent ready this is not any Forfeiture for the Lord may Distrain 1 Rolls Abr. 506. therefore the Case in Cokes Copy-holder p. 189. is not Law which saith That if the Copy-holder tells his Lord that he wanteth Mony to discharge the Rent and intreateth him to forbear unless the Lord giveth his consent that this is a Forfeiture vide Noy p. 58. Crispe and Fryar Cro. El. 505. mesme Case A Widow had Copy-hold Land and knew not how to pay her Rent and divers persons came for the Rent but she dismist them with dilatory Answers last of all comes a young Gallant and demands the Rent she answers That she did not know him but if he would dance before her if she liked his dancing she would pay it This denyal was adjudged no Forfeiture not being wilful Lit. Rep. 268 in Paston and Uthert's Case Voluntary refusal If the Copy-holder be absent when the Lord demands the Rent at a day and none is there to pay it this is a refusal in Law yet this is no Forfeiture for this amounts not to a voluntary refusal and there ought to be a demand of the person of the Copy-holder to make a Forfeiture Hob. p. 135. Denny and Lemon p. 38. El. B. R. Crisp and Fryer And therefore that other Assertion in Cokes Copy-holder p. 190 That if the Lord continue in making his demand upon the Land and the Copy-holder is still absent Absence that this makes the Copy-holders Estate subject to a Forfeiture seems not to be Law for the Lord may have other remedy for his Rent William's Case cited in Latch 122. Grey and Ulisses was thus The Lord demanded the Rent of his Copy-holder and he answered that he had it not with him then but that he would pay it as soon as he could the Lord said pay this at my House such a day which House was within the Manor it was resolved that the first words were not any Forfeiture Notice to pay the Rent at a place out of the Manor but when the Lord assigned him a day certain at which day he pays it not this failure amounts to a wilful refusal and was a Forfeiture But had the place been out of the Manor it had been no Forfeiture which Crew Chief Justice agreed to Copy-holder in Fee rendring Rent at Michaelmas and Lady-day Not paid at the last instant of the day he suffers the Rent to be unpaid for three years the Lord at the last Instant of the day of payment demands the Rent upon the Land and the Copy-holder is not there to pay it the better Opinion was that it is a Forfeiture Moor n. 468. Crisp and Fryar An Act which makes a Forfeiture ought to be to the disherison of the Lord of his Copy-hold not of a collateral thing Copy-holds are determinable the same way as Estates at Will When a Copy-holder doth acts as Owner not warranted by the Custom 5 Rep. 13. as Waste unless the special Custom aid 2 Keb. 466. Ivery's Case If the Estate of the Lord of the Manor cease by limitation of Use and the Use and Estate of it is transferred to another Notice of the alteration of the use and Estate or else no Forfeiture for denyal of payment of Rent who demands the Rent of the Copy-holder and he denies to pay it this is no Forfeiture without notice given to the Copy-holder of the Use and Estate Beconshaw and Southcot's Case cited in 8 Rep. 92. Francis's Case Bargainee of a Manor by Deed Indented and Inrolled shall not take advantage of the Forfeiture of a Copy-hold for denyal of payment of Rent to him without notice given to him of the Bargain and Sale agreed for Law in Francis's Case 8 Rep. Copy-holder before any Rent due saith he will not pay any Rent to the Lord hereafter What words of denyal amount to a Forfeiture or not or when a Court is to be holden that he will not appear to do any Suit at the Court of the Lord these are no Forfeitures But if his Rent being due he denies it or when the Court is holden he saith he will not do any Suit the same is a Forfeiture Sir Christopher Hatton's Case cited 3 Leon. 108. in Tavernor and Cromwel's Case Vide supra Paston and Utbert's Case In case of the forfeiture of a Copy-hold either for Rent or Fine the Lord must demand the Rent or Fine of the person of the Tenant Fine and therefore in Denny and Lemon's Case Hob. p. 135. Demand must be made of the person of the Tenant In Trespass by the Copy-holder against his Lord the Defendant pleads he had admitted the Copy-holder and assessed a Fine of 20 Nobles upon it and had appointed him to pay it to his Bayliff at his House being within the Manor three Months after and alledged That he
prays to be admitted to them then a publick Proclamation shall be made in full Court That the Heir shall come to the Court to claim and be admitted and so at two other ensuing Courts the like Proclamation Custom if the Heir come not and pray to be admitted after three Proclamations he shall forfeit but not if he be beyond Sea and if the Heir come not then the Lord to seize them as forfeited Per Cur. this Custom and non-claim shall not foreclose the Heir which was beyond Sea at the time of the Proclamations made for by intendment of Law he cannot have notice c. But if the Heir had been within the Realm at the time of the first Proclamation and after goes beyond Seas the Proclamations shall bind him though he be beyond Sea at the time of the other Proclamations made for he shall not defeat the Lord by his own Act 8 Rep. Sir Rich. Lechford's Case Cro. Jac. p. 226. Underhil and Kelsey he cannot return when he will and the Law doth not compel one to impossibilites though Coke then Puisny Justice in that Case of Underhil was of another Opinion and he might by Letter of Attorny pray to be admitted and Cro. Jac. 101. Whitton and Williams The Proclamations to be proved viva voce Proclamations whereby the Lord claims Forfeiture ought to be proved viva voce and not only by the Court Rolls The Proclamation was That J. S. come in and be admitted to the Lands descended unto him which the certainty of the Lands being before declared How to be made as to the certainty of the Lands is sufficient unless the Custom be contrary and not like a demand of Rent which being generally of so much is ill especially the Custom of the Manor being to demand it generally and not to specifie the Lands 1 Keb. 287. Lord Salisbury's Case Homage forfeit for refusing to make a presentment If a Jury or Homage of the Manor after Oath taken to present the Articles of the Court refuse to make a presentment according to their Oath If they are Copy-holders this is a Forfeiture of their Estate Dyer 4 El. 211. As to Misfeazance what acts made or done by a Copy-holder shall be a Forfeiture Note Every act that makes a Forfeiture ought to be 1st To the disherison of the Lord 2ly A voluntary act against the Custom therefore a Trespass on the Demesns of the Lord is no Forfeiture As to making Leases not warranted For the Lord of a Manor to avoid a Lease for a Forfeiture by making a Lease contrary to the Custom There must be certain proof of such a Lease there ought to be direct proof made of a Lease certain with beginning and ending certain so to make any other act or thing a Forfeiture this must certainly appear to the Court and the Oath of a Stranger in the Lords Court to the Homagers That a Copy-holder had made a Lease for ten years that so the Homagers may find and present the Forfeiture shall not be of force especially the Copy-holder continuing in possession and dying seized of his Copy-hold Estate and this never came in question till after his death 1 Bulstr 189. Hamlen's Case Copy-holder for Life makes a Lease for a year A Lease made for years excepting two days in each year c. is a Fraud and shall be a â—orfeituâ—e and afterwards makes a Lease to the same party for another year to commence one day after the first year and another Lease for another year to commence at a day after the second year and after surrenders his Copy-hold to the Lord the Lord enters and makes a Lease to the Plaintiff in the Ejectment Per Cur. 1. Although the general Custom of the Realm allows a Copy-holder to make a Lease for one year this ought to be in present and he cannot make one for another year in reversion 2. The Lease in reversion was a Forfeiture and when the Surrender was made to the Lord this Lease was void against him and his Interest discharged without presentment and seizure for the Forfeiture for which his Entry was lawful and Judgment pro Quer. Jones 249. Mathews and Weston 1 Bulstr 215. mesme Case Rolls Abr. 510. mesme Case This Case is thus Reported by Rolls If a Copy-holder for Life agrees to make three several Leases by Indenture the one to commence after the other there being two days between the end of the first and the commencement of the seccond and so between the second and the third and after he executes them at one time this is a Forfeiture for this is apparent Fraud and a greater Estate than for one year passeth presently Rolls Abr. 508. Mathews and Weston If a Copy-holder makes a Lease for one year and covenants that after the end of this year he shall have the same for another year and so in this manner de anno in annum during the space of ten years this is no such Lease as shall make a Forfeiture of his Copy-hold Estate because he hath no lawful Lease but for one year only 1 Bulstr 187 190. Hamlen's Case 6 Rep. 35. b. Plowd 237. b. Cro. Jac. 301. the Lady Mountagues Case A Copy-holder makes a Lease for an year excepting the last day of the year and so from year to year excepting the last day of every year as long as he lived The Question was if this were such a Lease as would cause a Forfeiture for it was not a Lease for an entire year neither is it a Lease for two years together Per Cur. it is a Forfeiture It s a certain Lease for years excepting two days which is a Lease in effect for more than one year Cro. Jac. p. 308. Lutterel and Weston A Lease for three years by Parol is a Forfeiture whether the Lessee enter or not Lease Parol and this for the unlawful Contract made to the disherison of the Lord and a Lease to commence at a day to come is a Forfeiture Lease to commence at a day to come because it is not avoidable by any of the Parties Moor n. 508. East and Harding and so in Harding and Turpin's Case Hetly p. 122. If a Copy-holder make a Lease for years to commence at Michaelmas next it s a Forfeiture presently and so Cro. El. Jackman's Case 351. A Lease for years of Copy-hold Land by Indenture or Parol is a Forfeiture unless there be an express Custom to warrant it So Cro. El. East and Harding's Case The Lord licenceth a Copy-holder to make a Lease of his Copy-hold for 21 years to begin at Michaelmas following and he made a Lease accordingly by Indenture and also before Michaelmas by Deed made another Lease for 21 years to begin at Michaelmas following By concurrent Lease Per Anderson the making of the second Lease was a Forfeiture the Licence is satisfied by the first Lease and so the second Lease is without warrant Moor n.
re-grant it to him again If a Copy-hold Escheat to the Lord Escheat and he alien the Manor by Fine Feoffment c. his Alienee may re-grant this Land by Copy for it was always demised or demisable but if it be a particular Copy-hold Estate otherwise as was said in the beginning of this Case 4 Rep. 31. Frenches Case If a Copy-holder sue Execution of a Statute against the Lord of a Manor Not destroyed by execution of the Manor at the Copy-holders Suit and had the Manor in Execution and after the Debt is levied the Interest of the Copy-hold remains Per Manwood Heydon's Case Savills Rep. A Copy-holder in Fee marries a Woman Suspended Seignioress of the Manor and after they suffer a Common Recovery which was to the Use of themselves for Life Remainder over by some the Copy-hold is extinct for by the Recovery the Husband had gained an Estate of Freehold But Per Cur. by the inter-marriage it was only suspended Cro. El. p. 7. Anonymus If a Copy-holder accept of a Lease for years of the Manor or marry the Lords Wife by this the Copy-hold is not extinct but suspended If a Copy-hold be granted to three for Lives Suspended and the first of them take an Estate by Deed with livery from the Lord by this the Copy-hold for that Life is suspended Dyer 30. 4 Rep. 31. No prejudice to the Wife or to him in reversion Baron seized of a Manor in right of his Feme let Copy-hold Land parcel thereof for years by Indenture and dyed this doth not destroy the Custom as to the Wife but that after the death of her Husband she may demise by Copy as before So If Tenant pur vie of a Manor let a Copy-hold parcel of the Manor for years and dyes it shall not destroy the Custom as to him in Reversion Cro. El. P. 38 Eliz. Conesby and Rusketh for being Tenant pur vie he may not do wrong by destroying of Customs King H. 8. grants Lands being parcel of Copy-hold of a Manor without reciting this to be Copy-hold to Sir J. G. pur vie Sir J. G. morust Queen Mary grants the Manor to Susan Tenny in Fee who let the Manor for years to Lee. Lee before his years expired grants the Land in question to R. L. in Fee according to the Custom of the Manor Lee's years expire R. L. let to Field at will and the Defendant enters as Heir to Tenny Judgment pro Quer. Suspension and not Destruction of a Custom Kings Prerogative The Grant of the King is but a suspension and no destruction of the Custom And though the Maxim is It ought to be demised and demisable c. yet this holds not in the case of the King 2 Siderfin p. 142. Vide contra 1 Rolls Abr. 498. Downcliff and Minors Vide sub Tit. Grants by the Lord. As to the escheating of Copy-holds after escheating it cannot properly be called a Copy-hold Escheat except it be because there is power in him to re-grant it as Copy-hold Were it by Custom that the Wife shall be endowed of the intierty or moiety and such customary Copy-hold Lands Escheat and the Husband dyes The Wife not to be endowed after Escheat his Wife shall not be endowed of the intierty or moiety because the Custom as to her is extinct 2 Siderfin 19. A Copy-hold Escheated may be demised notwithstanding the Lords Continuance of it in his Hands above 20 years 2 Keb. 213. Pemble and Stern Note If the Copy-holder of a Manor hath had time out of memory Copy-hold extinct but not a Way over the Copy-hold Land a Way over the Land of another Copy-holder and he purchaseth the Inheritance of his Copy-hold by which the Copy-hold is extinct yet by this the Way is not extinct 1 Rolls Abr. 933. Empson and Williamson CAP. XXIV How and where Copy-holder shall hold his Lands charged or not by the Lord or Copy-holders as Dowers Rent-charges Statutes And how and where they shall be avoided THE Lord of a Manor in which were Copy-holders for Lives takes a Wife Dower of the Lords Wife and after a Copy-holder dyes the Lord after Coverture grants the Lands again according to the Custom of the Manor for Lives and dyes the Lords Widow shall not avoid these Grants in a Writ of Dower yet the Custom which is the Life of the Grant was long before 4 Rep. 24. If Feoffee of a Manor upon Condition make voluntary Grants of Copy-hold Estates according to Custom and after the Condition is broken By Feoffee a Manor upon condition and Feoffee re-enters yet the Grants by Copy shall stand Earl of Arundel's Case cited in Co. 4 Rep. 24. Copy-holder by voluntary grant not subject to the Lords Charges The Copy-holder which comes in by voluntary Grant shall not be subject to the Charges or Incumbrances of the Lord before the Grant 8 Rep. 63. Swain's Case Lord of a Manor where the Custom was of Land demisable for one two or three Lives that he that was first named in the Copy should enjoy it only for his Life and so the second The Remainder preserves the Estate from Charges c. grants it to J. P. and E. and M. his Daughters for their Lives if the Lord had charged the Inheritance of the Copy-hold J. P. shall not hold it charged during his Life for the mean Estates in Remainder preserve the Estate of J. P. by Copy from the Incumbrances of the Lord 9 Rep. 107. Margaret Podger's Case Rent charge Earl of W. seized of Manor by Copy grants a Rent-charge to Sir W. Cordel for the term of his Life and conveys the Manor to Sir W. Clifton in Tayl the Rent is behind Sir W. Cordrel dyes the Manor descends to Sir John Clifton who grants a Copy-hold to H. The Executors of Sir W. Cordel distrain for the Rent Per Cur. the Copy-holder shall hold the Land charged 2 Leon. p. 152. and 109. Cordel and Clifton But it hath been adjudged That the Wife of the Lord shall not be endowed against the Copy-holder for the Title of Dower is not consummated before the death of the Husband so as the Title of Copy-holder is compleated before the Title of Dower and in this Case the Seisin and possession continues in Sir John Clifton who claims only by Sir William Clifton who was the Tenant in Demesn who ought to pay the Rent Lord and Copy-holder for Life be the Lord grants a Rent-charge out of the Manor Rent charge by the Lord upon the Manor whereof the Copy-hold is parcel the Copy-holder surrenders to the Use of A. who is admitted accordingly he shall not hold it charged but if the Copy-holder dyeth so that his Estate is determined and the Lord granteth to a Stranger de novo to hold the said Land by Copy this new Tenant shall hold the Land charged 1 Leon. p. 4. Lord of a Manor where Lands were
Lease had been in possession and the Lessee had never entred he had been barred 1 Brownl 181. This Fine shall not be a bar to the Copy-hold Estate in Remainder for Life for it is not turned to a right the Estate is given by Custom and is to have his beginning after the death of the first Tenant and if the first Tenant commit Forfeiture he in Remainder cannot enter and by Coke notwithstanding the acceptance of the Bargain and Sale the first Copy-hold Estate for Life remains in esse 2 Br. 153. mesme Case Custom that the Lord shall seize Copy-hold after three Proclamations and non-Claim by the Heir shall not bind the Heir that is beyond the Sea 8 Rep. Sir Richard Lechford's Case Statute 37 H. 8. Of Dissolutions 37 H. 8. Of Monasteries extends not to Copy-holds A Copy-holders Estate is not within the Statute of Monasteries and Chanteries to be avoided by any of the Statutes So by Statute 1 Ed. 6. Cap. 14. it is expresly provided That upon the dissolution of Abbies and Monasteries Copy-holds should continue as they did before the Statutes and should fall into the Kings Hands A Copy-holder dissolved by the Statute of Edw. 6. did between the Statute of 37 H. 8. and 1 Edw. 6. grant a Copy-hold Estate in Reversion but the Statute 37 H. 8. extends not to them 3 Bulstr p. 15. Long and Baker Vide 1 Leon. p. 4. mesme Case 31 H. 8. Eccles Leases Of making Leases of Copy-hold Lands belonging to Religious Houses for years after Leases for Lives or Years in being is within that Statute 8 Rep. 7. Heydon's Case 32 H. 8. Of Conditions Entries Assignee Copy-hold is not within the Statute of Entries for Conditions broken Surrendree of Reversion shall not enter for a Condition broken it s not within the Statute of Conditions Hob. p. 177 178. Swinnerton and Miller Copy-hold is not within the Statute of 32 H 8. Entries for Conditions Copy-holder by Licence makes a Lease for 60 Acres rendring Rent and condition of Re-entry Copy-holder Surrenders to J. S. and he demands Rent and enters for Non-payment J. S. is not such an Assignee as the Statute intends and Custom doth not trench to such collateral things such Assignee being in only by Custom is not privy to the Lease made by the first Copy-holder nor in by him but he may plead his Estate immediately under the Lord Yel 222. Brasier's Case But Assignee of a Copy-hold is within the Statute to have Action of Covenant 1 Keb. 356. Arrears of Rent Baker's Case Quaere if of Debt Cro. Car. 21. Platt and Plummer Executors brought Action for Arrears of Rent of Copy-hold of which Manor the Testator died seized Per Cur. Action doth not lye for Arrears of Copy-hold Rents but only of Rents of Free Land and Statute 32 H. 8. extends not to them Yelv. 135. Appleton and Doiley 1 Brownl 102. Tenant in Tayl of a Manor wherein Copy-holds are demisable for Life c. for a certain Rent Copy-holder for Life dyes and the Lord demiseth it for 21 years 38 H. 8. Rents of Leases in Tayl. rendring the ancient Rent c. it s good within the Statute 38 H. 8. for its not any prejudice to the Issue as to the Rent Noy p. 106. The Lord Norris's Case Vide infra hoc capite If the Lord of a Copy-holder for Life demisable by 10 s. Rent leaseth it by Indenture to the Copy-holder and two others for their Lives rendring 10 s. Rent by which it is within the Statute of 32 H. 8. and is not material though the Harriot be lost because it is meerly casual Noy p. 110. Banks and Brown Vide Montjoy's Case 5 Rep. Et supra Copy-hold is within the Statute 32 H. 8. 9. 32 H. 8. Cap. 9. Of maintenance Of Maintenance for the Word is Any Right or Title 4 Rep. 26. a. Vide infra hoc capite Copy-hold is grantable for three Lives 13 El. Cap. 10. Dean and Chapter of London grant this to H. G. for the Lives of J. R. and M. reserving the ancient Rent but no Harriot the Rent was payable at four Quarters and by this Lease its payable half yearly yet this is not void by the Statute 13 El. Cap. 10. For the Occupant shall be punish'd for Waste and the Harriot is not annual nor depends on the Rent and as to the Rent it s the accustomed yearly Rent but in Mountjoy's 5 Rep. yearly was wanting 6 Rep. 37 Dean and Chapter of Worcesters Case Copy-holds are within all the Statutes of Bankrupts by express words vide supra Statutes of Bankrupts 1 El. and Jac. A Copy-hold is not within the Statute of Limitations Debt for the Fine of a Copy-holder is not within the Statute of Limitations 2 Keb. 536. Statute of Limitations Hodsden and Harris Vide. It is laid down for a Rule in Rowden and Malster's Case Cro. Car. 44. When an Act of Parliament altereth the Service Custom Tenure and Interest of the Land Rules when Acts of Parliament extend to Copy-holds or not or other thing in prejudice of the Lord or Tenant there the general words of such an Act shall not extend to Copy-holds Therefore W. 2. Cap. 20. Elegit Statute W. 2. Cap. 20. which gives Elegit extends not to Copy-hold Lands because it would be prejudicial to the Lord and a breach of the Custom that any stranger should have Interest there without admittance and allowance of the Lord. 27 H. 8.10 Stat. of Uses Statute 27 H. 8.10 of Uses toucheth not Copy-holds because the transmutation of Possession by the sole Operation of the Statute without allowance of the Lord would be to the Lords prejudice 31 H. 8. and 32 H. 8. Of Partition The Statute 31 H. 8. Cap. 1. and 32 H. 8. Cap. 2. whereby Joynt-tenants and Tenants in common are compellable to make Prohibition extend not to Copy-holds And the 32 H. 8. Cap. 28. Leases by Tenant in Tayl or by Husband of the Wives Land Statute 32 H. 8. Cap. 28. Which confirms Leases for 21 years made by Tenants in Tayl or by the Husband and Wife of the Wives Land touch not Copy-holds for that Statute warrants only such Leases of Lands which are grantable by Deed such are not Copy-hold Lands though by the Lords Licence they may be granted by Indenture yet in their own nature they are only demisable by Copy So Statute 32 H. 8. Cap. 34. And for the same reason which gives an Entry to the Grantee of a Reversion upon the breach of a condition by the particular Tenant toucheth not Copy-hold In all Statutes made for the good of the Common-wealth and wherein no prejudice accrues to the Lord or Tenants by reason of the alteration of any Interest Service Tenure or Custom of the Manor there the general words of such acts of Parliament do extend to Copy-hold Lands as Statute of Merton Cap. 1.
Merton Cap. 1. Of Damages sur Recovery en Dower which gives Damages to a Feme Covert upon a Recovery in a Writ of Dower where the Baron dyed seized extends to Copy-holds And Stat. W. 2. C. 3. W. 2. Cap. 3. Cui in vita And the three several branches of that Stat. the one which gives a cui in vita upon a discontinuance made by the Husband The second which gives the Receit to the Wife upon her Husbands refusal to defend the Wifes Title Resceit And the third which gives a Quod ei deforceat to particular Tenants extends to Copy-holds Quod ei deforceat And The Statute 32 H. 8. Cap. 9. 32 H. 8. cap. 9. Champerty against Champerty and litigious Titles which gives an Entry in lieu of a Cui in vita extendeth to Copy-holds Cro. Car. 43. Rowden and Malster Vide Plowd f. 371. The Statute W. 2. which gives Elegits Elegit extends not to Copy-holds for that would be a prejudice and the Common Law would break the Custom Savil's Reports Heydon's Case vide supra Copy-hold Lands are liable to the Statutes of Recusants 13 El. cap. 4. Of Recusants and the King shall have the profits of the Lands only but no Estate and such Statute doth not make a Tenant to the Lord and though the King hath the Copy-hold Land yet the Lord shall have the Rent during the possession of the King 1 Leon. p. 98. Saliard and Everat's Case Owen p. 37. mesme Case Copy-hold Lands are not within the words of that Statute but by Anderson 34 H. 8.5 Of Wills the Equity of that Act doth extend to Copy-holds 1 Leon. 83. in Skipwith's Case 31 Eliz. cap. 7. Cottages Copy-hold is not within that Stat. 1 Bulstr 50. Brock's Case 11 H. 7. cap. 10. Joyntresses Copy-hold Lands are assured to the Wife for her Joynture and she aliens them it s no Forfeiture within Statute 11 H. 8. Cap. 10. Copy-hold Land is not within that Statute 2 Siderfin p. 41 73. Harrington and Smith CAP. XXVII Of Emblements who shall have them the Lord or the Copy-holder A Woman who had her Widows Estate of Copy-hold Land and before severance took Husband the Lord shall have the Corn because the Estate of the Woman determined by her own act otherwise if her Estate had ended by Death Divorce Determination of the Will c. Moor n. 512. Oland and Burdwick 5 Rep. 115. mesme Case If a Copy-holder Durante viduitate Lease for one year and the Lessee sows the Land and after the Copy-holder takes an Husband yet the Lessee shall have the Corn for her act shall not prejudice a third person Ibid. Oland's Case If the Husband seized of a Copy-hold in Fee sows the Land and after surrenders to the Use of his Wife who is admitted accordingly and after the Husband dyes before severance it seems the Wife shall have the Corn and not the Executors or Administrators of the Husband Annexed to the Land for that the Husband passed the Emblements with the Land to the Wife as annexed to the Land and by this the Priviledge which the Law gives to him who sows it is taken away by the Surrender and so it is all one as if the Wife had sowed it or purchased the Land sowed by a Stranger 1 Rolls Abr. 727. CAP. XXVIII What shall be said a Disseisin as to Copy-hold Estates or not IF a Copy-holder in Fee dyeth seized and the Lord admit a Stranger to the Land who entreth he is but a Tenant at will and not a Disseisor to the Copy-holder who hath the Land by Discent because he cometh in by the Assent of the Lord 3 Leon. 210. If a Copy-holder without Licence makes a Lease for years the Lessee who enters by colour of that is a Disseisor and a Disseisor cannot maintain an Ejectione Firmae 2. Brownl p. 40. Petty and Evans If a Copy-holder Lease for years by License of the Lord and after enters upon the Lessee and ousts him this is a Disseisin to the Lord of the Frank-Tenement 1 Rolls Abr. 662. by Coke Vide sparsim CAP. XXIX Actions and Suits What Action may be brought by the Lords What Actions brought by Copy-holders or their Executors in respect to their Copy-hold Estates shall be good or not either against their Lords or others What Actions may be brought by the Lords THE Lord upon seizure of Copy-holder may maintain Ejectment till the Heir comes to be admitted as in Harverights Case Latch 511. upon Entry of the Feoffor upon Rent reserved and Entry till satisfaction he may upon such Interest quousque maintain an Ejectment 1 Keb. 2â—7 Lord Salisbury's Case As to the Lords Action for Rent Distress Remedy for Forfeitures Vide supra sparsim per tout in Indice What Actions a Copy-holder may bring against his Lord and what not Trespass upon Ejectment by the Lord. Copy-holder doing and paying the Customs and Services if he be ejected by his Lord he shall have an Action of Trespass against him Co. Lit. 60. b. 61. a. 4 Rep. 22. a. For though he is Tenens ad voluntatem Domini yet it is Secundumconsuetudinem Manerij For cutting Trees He shall have Trespass against his Lord for cutting of Trees or breaking his House in the Case of Stebbing and Gosnel 1 Rolls Abr. 108. The Custom was That every Copy-holder in Fee shall have the Loppings of the Pollingers The Lord cuts down two Oaks and in his Plea to an Action sur Case saith he cut down two Oakes being Pollinger Timber Trees and left the Loppings there for the Plaintiff On Demurrer it was adjudged for the Plaintiff for a Copy-holder of Inheritance hath interest in the Loppings and Boughs as well as the Lord in the Timber And if the Lord shall cut down all the Timber Trees than the Copy-holder shall lose the Profit Cro. El. p. 629. Moor n. 727. mesme Case 1 Rolls Rep. Ford and Hoskin's Case Nay the Action of Trespass by a Copy-holder in Fee against his Lord for cutting down the Trees lyes at Common Law without any special Custom for the Copy-holder hath a special property therein and the Lord a general property the Lord may as well subvert the Houses as cut down the Trees for without them the Copy-holder hath no means to Repair it 2 Brownl 328. Heydon and Smith and in Doyle's Case Mich. 25. and 26 El. it was adjudged where it was a Custom that the Copy-holder might cut Maremium to Repair if the Lord carry it away an Action of Trespass lyes against him by the Tenant in Taylor 's Case Pasch 36. Eliz. A man was Tenant by Copy of Court Roll of Wood and the Soyl was excepted to the Lord and yet the Copy-holder maintained an Action of Trespass against the Lord for cutting his Wood Moor n. 480. If a Stranger cut a Tree Trespass by the Lord and the Copy-holder for cutting down Trees the
per quod quer ' communiam suam predict pro averiis suis c. in tam amplo beneficiali modo prout antea habuit c. habere non potuit This is a good Declaration though the Commoner cannot have any Damage for the taking and carrying away the Turffs yet the coming on the Land with Horse and Carts is a prejudice to the Common and the per quod the Common is impaired is the cause of Action and the carrying away a means to impair it 1 Rolls Abr. 89. Terry and Goodier and good tho' Damages were entire Action shall be brought in a Copy-holder Lunaticks name for though the custody of the Land was granted to one by the Lord yet no Interest was gained by this commitment and the Lord hath not power over the Lunaticks Lands without a Custom Hobart p. 215 216. Cox and Darson Trespass Quare clausum fregit Copy-holder of Under-Wood without the Soil shall have Trespass Quare clausum fregit Moor n. 480. Account for Profits Account lies not for an Heir Copy-holder for the Profits of his Copy-hold Lands taken during his non-Age where the Defendant hath not entred and taken the Profits as Prochein Amy but claims by Custom and Grant of the Lord to the Use of the Assignee which Custom is good 1 Leon. p. 226. n. 356. Anonymus Faux Judgment Writ of faux Judgment lies not for a Copy-holder Vide supra Writ of Right Close Writ of Right Close lies not for a Copy-holder 4 Rep. 21. Avowry for Rent by Lessee of a Copy-holder Lessee for years of a Manor distrains a Copy-holder for Rent he Replevins Lessee Avows Per Curiam Avowry may be made for the Rent of a Copy-holder in the Kings-Bench and there is difference between an Ejectione Firmae and this Case For the Ejectione Firmae is brought for the Copy-hold it self But this Avowry is for Rent due to the Lord which is a duty at the Common Law and therefore an Avowry may well be for it Cro. El. p. 524. Laughter and Humphry A Copy-holder in Fee by Licence made a Lease for 21 years by Indenture rendring Rent Covenant by Assignee of a Reversion wherein the Lessee Covenants for himself his Executors and Assigns That he will erect a c. The Lessor surrendred to the Use of the Plaintiff and his Heirs who was admitted accordingly and the Plaintiff as Assignee brings his Action of Covenant Whether the Assignee may maintain this Action by the Common Law or by the Statute 32 H. 8. Cap. 34. was the Question for the Defendant demurred upon the Declaration it was adjourned in Cro. Car. 24. Plat and Plummer But it seems by 1 Keb. 356. Baker and Berisford's Case That the Assignee is not within this Statute to have a Covenant Action of Debt doth not lye for Arrearages of Copy Rents for the Stat. of 32 H. 8. Action of Debt for Rent does not extend to them but to Rents out of Free Land Yelv. p. 135. Appleton and Doily And so Executors shall not have Debt for Arreages of such Rents due in the Life-time of the Testator The Lord of a Manor is and Fines No Remedy for Fines Rents c. after vendition for Admittances and Copy-hold Rents are Arrear and then he sells the Manor he is without Remedy both in Law and Equity He hath deprived himself of the Remedy by his own act viz. the vendition 1 Rolls Abr. 374. Serjeant Hitcham and Finch Copy-holder for Life becomes Lunatick A. Action of Trover to be brought in the Lunaticks name he being a Copy-holder sows the Land The Lord grants the custody of the Lunatick to B. A. takes the Corn to the Use of the Lunatick B. Brought Trover in his own name it s ill brought It ought to be brought in the Lunaticks name and not in the name of the Committee Noy p. 27. Cox and Dawson Covenant by Rent Custom is when a Copy-holder dies seized of Copy-hold Lands or Rent That his Wife shall have the one moiety and his Issues the other moiety A. B. so seized takes Mary to Wife and they have Issue John A. B. dies so that Mary is seized of the moiety for her Life and John of the other moiety in Fee and of the first moiety as his Reversion Mary and John her Son make a Lease to J. B. for twenty one years rendring fifty pounds Rent to Mary and fifty pounds to John and after the death of Mary one hundred pounds to John John marries Margaret they have Issue three Sons John dies so that a fourth part comes to his Wife and the other fourth part to his three Sons Rent is behind Margaret brought Debt on Covenant for the Rent Per Curiam it was well brought by her sole Joynder in Action without joyning Mary with her Tenant in Commonn shall joyn in Action so long as the privity of Contract remains but when the privity is determined as it is here they may sever and such Contract shall ensue the nature of the Land and also there is a vesting by Custom and express several Reservations 2 Siderfin p. 9. Baker and Berisford CAP. XXX Of Copy-holders being Impleaded and Impleadable in the Lords Court Vide supra Tit. Customs COpy-hold Lands are as the Demesns of the Manor and are the Lords Freehold and therefore are not impleadable but in the Lords Court Croke Jac. 559. Pymmock and Hilder One recovered certain Copyhold Lands in the Court of the Lord of the Manor by Plaint in the nature of a Writ of Right A Precept cannot be made and awarded out of the Court to execute the said Recovery Posse Manerij and to put him who recovered into possession with the Posse Manerij for force in such cases is not justifiable but by command out of the Kings Courts 3 Leon. 99. A Woman recovered Dower of a Copy-hold within the Manor and 40 l. Damages 40 l. Damages recovered yet no Execution or remedy but by Petition and she brought Debt for the Damages in B.R. Per Cur. it lyes not because the Court Baron cannot hold Plea nor award Execution of 40 l. Damages though the Damages were there well assessed and because no Writ of Error or Faux Judgment lyes upon such a Recovery of a Copy-hold but only a Petition to the Lord of a Manor so that Copy-hold Plaints are not within the Jurisdiction of this Court of Kings-Bench Moor n. 559. Shaw and Tompson If an erroneous Judgment be given in a Copy-hold Court of a common Lord in an Action in nature of a Formedon a Bill may be exhibited in Chancery Faux Judgment how relieved in nature of a Faux Judgment to reverse this Pateshall's Case in Scaccario 1 Rolls Abr. 373. and Co. on Lit. p. 60. a. He cannot have the Kings Writ of false Judgment in respect of the baseness of the Estate and Tenure being in the Eye of the Law but a
Tnant at Will and the Freehold being in another But he may have a Petition to the Lord in the nature of a Faux Judgment and therein assign Errors and have Remedy according to Law 4 Rep. 21. Brown's Case Fenner said he had seen a Record 36 H. 8. where the Lord by Petition to him had for certain Errors in the Proceedings reversed such Judgment given in his own Court Now real Pleints are in the Lords Court are in this Form A. de B. queritur versus C. de D. de placito terrae videlicet de uno Messuagio quadraginta Acris terrae c. cum pertin fecit protestationem sequi querelam istam in natura Brevis Domini Regis Assisae mortis Antecessoris ad communem Legem vel Brevis Domini Regis Assisae novae disseisinae ad communem Legem aut in natura Brevis de forma donationis in discendere ad communem Legem and so in the nature of any other Writ c. plegii de prosequendo F. G. c. CAP. XXXI Declaration of for and concerning Copy-hold Lands and Presidents IN Ejectione Firmae it was doubted by the Court whether the Plaintiff in his Declaration ought to set forth the Custom of the Manor That the Copy-holder may Lease c. and then to shew that the Lease is warranted by the Custom Whether in Ejectment the Plaintiff need to shew that the Lease was warranted by the Custom in 1 Anderson Rep. Ewer and Astwick But it is fully resolved and agreed in Rumney and Eves's Case 1 Leon p. 100. That the Plaintiff ought not to shew that the Lease is warranted by the Custom but that shall come of the other side This was Pasch 30 El. B. R. But in Hill 38 El. Cro. p. 469. Wells and Partridge it was doubted because otherwise being a general Court it shall be intended of a Lease at Common Law which a Copy-holder cannot make as if the Heir in Burrough English brings a Mordancestor he ought to shew the Custom in his Count and declare according thereunto This was the Opinion of Anderson in the Case and in Moor n. 927. Gregory and Harrison It is said to be resolved an Ejectione Firmae doth not lye of a Copy-hold if the Plaintiff doth not declare the Custom Lease and Ejectment but the Practice now is otherwise Upon Agreement Whereas W. was seized of Copy-hold Lands That he should surrender the same to the Use of Elkin and that he was to give him for the same 560 l. and if he sold the same over the Plaintiff to have the moiety of what he sold over and above It is said in the Declaration Declaration must be That he is seized in Dom. suam ut de feodo secundum c. and also may shew that they are customary Lands he was seized in Dominico ut de feodo secundum consuetudinem manerij and he doth not shew the same was customary Land Per Cur. he ought to shew it but he need not shew that he was admitted 3 Bulstr 230. Elkins and Wastel Declaration sur Assumpsit to make a Surrender of Copy-hold Land Placita gen spec p. 16. Declaration in Case for a Copy-holder for cutting down Trees upon his customary Tenements Brownl 252. Def. seisitus de terris custumar vendidit querentur statum suum inde ac omnia bona asâ—umpsit causare statum fieri quer in terris deliberare bona Rast Ent. 7. Nar pro tenen customar versus Dom Maner qui succidit arbores suê‘ Tenementa custumar per quod quer non habet suffeciens forale sepimentur maremium ê‘ro reparatione secundum consuetud Manerij Hern 216 or 226. 1 Brown 252. Pro ten custumar versus un Tanner de Tanpiâ—s erect propre rivulum decurren ad Messuagium querentis per quod aqua corrumpitur Hern 254. Ad exheredand quer de Tenementis custumar impediend ipsum de Administratione bonor ei committend Co. Entr. 29. Pro ten custumar molendini versus occupationem tenementorum quâ— per consuetur debeâ— molare grana ad dict' molend Hern 83. Narrat in Action sur Case per Copyhold que fuit le Tenant pur 3 vies successive des terres d'un Manor deins quel fuit un Custome habere successive c. un auter Custome que prima persona in copiis rotulorum ejusdem Manerij nominata poet surrender in manus Dom al son proper use al use des deux auters nominand Le Def. in consideratione quod le Plaintiff pro 12 d. in manibus 50 quarter de brasis illi deliberand assumpsit sursum reddere ad usu ipsius duor alior ex nominatione Def. procurare cur assumpsit promisit apparere apud Curiam accipere statum ad usum ipsius 2 aliorum deliberare les 50 quartur brasii pred Winch. Ent. 65. Narratur per Copyhold qui fuit Tenant pur 3 vies successive des terres tenus d'un Manor deins quel fuit un Custome habere successive c. un auter Custome que prima persona in Copiis rotulorum ejudem manerij nominat poec surrender in manus Dom al son proper use al use deux auters per ipsum nominand Le Def. in consideratione que pro 12 d. in manibus 50 quarters de Malt a luy deliberand ad assume a Surrender al use de luy mesme 2 auters nominatione Def. procurare curiam assumpsit promisit d'appearer al Court d'accepter del Estate a luy les deux auters pur deliver les 50 quarters de Melt venditur Winch Entr. p. 65. Chambers and Turner Cond del obligÌ„ a Surrender un Copyhold Estate al use delâ—quer al proche in Court Bar quod Def. al Court tenus tiel jour surrendroit accordant al effect del condicon Winch. Entr. 241 222. demur general al bar Eldre Ll'uelling CAP. XXXII Of Pleadings The general Rules of Pleading as to Copy-hold Estates Of Pleading Customs and Prescriptions and the different Forms Pleading in reference to Common and when to be pleaded by way of Custom or by way of Prescription The manner of Pleading when a Lease is to be answered which is set forth in the Avowry Where in Pleading the Commencement of the Estate must be shewn and by whom granted or not How a Licence must be pleaded by the Lessee Prescription for Copy-holders to be discharged of Tythes How to be pleaded Of Traverses when and where to be taken Forms of Pleading of Surrenders Admittances Forms of Pleading Estates in Fee Tayl for Lives or Years Pleading of Presentments Grants Pleadings in respect of Commons Trees Ways Inclosures Forfeiture and all other Pleadings necessary for the Copy-holder to set forth his Title or to defend it Pleadings General Rules of Pleading as to Copy-hold Estates EVery Admittance of an Heir upon a Descent amounts in Law to a Grant and after Admittance the Heir may in Pleading
Custom may be alledged within the Manor and applied but to a single Copy-hold Per Cur. such Custom as well for the form as the matter is good for a Copy-holder cannot prescribe in his own name for the exility of his Estate Precribe for Common in one Copy-holder but he ought to prescribe in the Lords name when he claims Common c. out of the Land of a Stranger but if he claim such profit in the Manor he must lay it by way of Custom for then he cannot prescribe in the Lords Name for the Lord cannot prescribe to have Common in his own Soil and one Copy-holder may have such Common c. It may have a lawful commencement and all the other Copyholds may be extinct 4 Rep. 31 32. Foyston's Case vide for Prescription devant In Trespass the Defendant justifies as Copy-holder for Common he saith these are customary Lands but doth not say ad voluntatem Dom. which is uncertain whether Tenant-right Lands or Burrough-English or Free-hold Judgment Pro Quer. 3 Keb. 368. Walker and Wilson Customs must be pursued in Pleadings A man cannot plead a Prescription against a Prescription A Prescription not to be pleaded against Prescription but he ought to answer the Prescription alledged in the Count when two Customs repugne Cro. Car. 432. Spooner and Day 's Case Carter's Rep. 88. Custom alledged to be That if any Copy-holder seised of customary Lands of the said Copy-hold die seized thereof having many Sons that the youngest shall Inherit and the Defendant in Replevin makes his Title That a customary Estate was granted to the Father and Mother and the Heirs of the Father and the Mother survived This Estate is not within the Letter of the Custom Per Walmsly and cited Sir John Savage's Case Quod vide supra sub Tit. Custom 2 Leon. 208. Beal and Langly A particular Tenant at Will may not prescribe in his sole Tenancy Prescription by a particular Tenant at Will but when the Prescription and the Custom runs half through the Manor he may well lay it by Custom Kelloway 76 77. Tropnel's Case Tenant may plead a Custom to enjoy without interruption of the Lord. Copy-holder may plead a Custom That every Tenant after he hath paid the Lord his Fine may enjoy his Lands and Tenements granted by Copy during their Estates Terms or Interests without interruption or expulsion of the Lord for the time being they performing their Services and doing nothing that may Forfeit Kelloway 76 77. Ann Tropnel's Case Vide supra When the Copy-holder claims any thing by Prescription in the Soil of another in Pleading he ought to prescribe in the name of the Lord but if he claim any thing in the Soil of the Lord When it must be pleaded by way of Custom and when by way of Prescription within the Manor then he shall plead the Custom of the Manor for there he cannot plead in the name of the Lord in as much as the Lord cannot prescribe in his own Soil Foyston's Case and 4 Rep. 31. Cooper's Case 6 Rep. 60. Gateward's Case Rule There is nothing more common than for the Lord to prescribe for his Tenants by Copy in another mans Land whereas if it be in his own it shall ever be laid per Custom Hob. p. 28 61. Of Pleading a Custom for Common by Prescription Defendant pleads in Trespass That there are divers Freehold Tenements time out of mind in the said Manor c. and that there were and are infra eand villan divers customary Tenements parcel of the said Manor grantable ad voluntatem Dom. by Copy That all the Tenants of the Free Tenements time out of mind Habuerunt usi fuerunt and all the Tenants of the customary Tenements per consuetudinem ejusdem manerij in eodem manerio a toto tempore supra dict usitat approbat habuerunt habere consueverunt solam separalem pasturam c. for all their Cattel Hogs Sheep and Steers excepted Levant and Couchant upon their respective Messuages and Tenements every year for all times of the year except c. as belonging and appertaining to their several Tenements and that at the time of the Trespass the Defendant put in his own Cattel Levant and Couchant upon this said Messuage prout ei bene licuit c. Exceptions to this Pleading were 1. That he was seised de Antiquo Messuagio and of no Land is not proper for in common intention Cattel cannot be said to be Levant upon a Messuage only 2. He saith he put in his own Levant and Couchant but avers not as he ought That none of them were Porci Oves or Steers 3. The Plea doth not set forth the Custom of the Manor but implicitely That the Freehold and customary Tenants have had and enjoyed Per Consuetudinem Manerij solam separalem Pasturam for all their Cattel which is a double Plea both of the Custom of the Manor and of the claim by reason of the Custom which ought to be several and the Court shall judge and not the Jury whether the claim be according to the Custom alledged the Custom may be different from the Claim Per Consuetudinem Manerij if particularly alledged Vaughan's Rep. 253. North and Cole In Replevin Defendant makes Conuzance as Bayliff to c. Damage Fesant In bar of this Cognizance the Plaintiff pleads That H. Earl of H. was seized of the Manor of A. whereof one Messuage c. is parcel and demisable by Copy and that within the said Manor there is this Custom That every customary Tenant of the said Messuage c. have used to have Pasture c. in the said place called Land-Mead The Form how to apply the Custom of a Manor to a particular Messuage in pleading and so derives his Title by Grant by Copy the Issue was upon the Traverse Absque hoc quod infra manerium praed talis habetur consuetudo quod quilibet tenens custumarius c. have used to have Common c. prout c. Here is no Custom alledged because it did not appear in Pleading That the place where the taking was supposed to be was within the said Manor and no Custom of the Manor can extend out of the Manor but he ought to prescribe in the Manor Note he ought to have pleaded That the place in which c. was parcel of the Manor and then the Plea had been good Hob. p. 286. 1 Brownl 172. Roberts and Young Plaintiff in Replevin rejoyns by Custom of all the Copyholders of Blackacre in the Manor of D. used to have Common in A. to which the Avowant demurred because he should have prescribed in the Lords name A. being out of the Manor but the truth being that A. was anciently parcel and lately severed by the Lord this destroys not the Common Per Cur. But the Copy-holder ought to prescribe specially That Talis consuetudo suit till such a day Special Prescription
Seigniory as suppose he is only for Life and he licenseth for 21 years and dies it s determined 2 Brownl 40. Petty and Evans In Ejectment The Defendant pleaded a Surrender of a Copy-hold by the Hand of F. then Steward of the Manor Issue was joyned absque hoc that he was Steward Per tot Cur. it s no Issue Pleading a Surrender how for the Traverse ought to be general that he did not surrender for if he were not Steward the Surrender is void So of a Surrender pleaded into the Hands of the Tenants of the Manor Cro. El. p. 260. Wood and Butts Pleads Prescription to be discharged of Tythes Copy-holders of Inheritance who held of a Bishop as of his Manor may prescribe That the Bishop and his Predecessors seized of the said Manor for themselves their Tenants for Lives Years and Tenants by Copy of Court Roll of the said Manor time out of memory c. have been discharged from payment of Tythes for their Lands parcel of the said Manor for this is a good Prescription for their Tenements are parcel of the Demesns of the Manor and this may commence upon a real composition of all the Manor 1 Rolls Abr. 652. The Case was thus A Parson sues a Copy-holder in the Spiritual Court for Tythes arising upon the Copy-hold Land he brought his Prohibition and suggests that the Bishop of Winchester Lord of the Manor whereof his Copy-hold is parcel and his Predecessors c. time out of memory c. for them their Tenants and Farmers have been discharged of Tythes arising upon the Manor and shews that he had been Copy-holder of the said Manor time out of memory c. and prescribes in his Lord the Bishop of Winchester's Name the Spiritual Court would not allow this Plea but Per Cur. a Prohibition was granted although here be a Prescription upon a Prescription Prescription upon a Prescription one in the Copy-holder to make his Estate good the other in the Bishop to make his Discharge good yet it was allowed for all Copy-holds are derived out of the Manor and it shall be intended That this Prescription had its commencement at such time when all was in the Lords Hands and the one Prescription is not contrariant to the other although both were from time whereof c. Prescription in the Lord ought of necessity to precede the Prescription in the Estate of the Copy-hold and the discharge of Tythes in the Lord which may well be in this case because he is a Spiritual person trenches to the benefit of the Tenant who is a Copy-holder for by this means it may be presumed that the Lord had greater Fines and Rents Yelv. 2. Croucher and Fryar which case is more largely Reported by Cro. El. 784. Otherwise a Copy-holder which is a Temporal person cannot prescribe in non decimando Prohibition granted out of B. C. against the Ordinary of G. and one Branch the surmise was That the Land out of which the Tythes were demanded is Copy-hold parcel of a Manor of which a Prior was seized in Fee and was also Parson imparsonee Union by which Union the Tythes were extinct Per Cur. the surmise is not good and a Consultation was awarded it was no good Prescription to discharge the Tythes Moor Rep. n. 356. Branches Case A Prohibition prayed upon a surmise that the Dean and Chapter of C. seized of the Manor and Rectory of M. and one G. a customary Tenant prescribes That every Tenant of his Tenement hath used to pay 3 s. 4 d. to the Lord who is also a Parson in discharge of his Rent and a fourth part of the Tythe of B. Per Cur. it s no good Prescription for the Parson cannot libel for the Rent nor the Lord for the Tythe Uncertain and non constat what each should have and the Parson must have a satisfaction or else there can be no discharge 1 Keb. 886 906. Wilkinson and Richardson Traverses Traversing the day of the Grant In Ejectment The Defendant entitles himself by Copy granted 44 Eliz. The Plaintiff by Replication intitles himself by Grant 1 June 43 Eliz. The Defendant maintains his bar and traverseth absque hoc that the Queen 1 June 43 regni sui granted the Land by Copy modo forma prout c. This Replication is not good for the day and year of granting the Copy is not material but only whether it were granted before the Copy made to the Defendant therefore he ought to have traversed absque hoc That the Queen granted modo forma prout c. and this is matter of substance and not aided the traversing of the day where it ought not is matter of substance for thereby he makes it parcel of the Issue which ought not to be Cro. Jac. 202. Lane and Alexander 1 Brownl 140. mesme Case In Ejectment The Defendant pleads the Land is Copy-hold parcel of the Manor of S. whereof the King was and is seised who by his Steward granted the same such a day to him in Fee Habend c. by vertue whereof he was admitted entred and was seized and so justifies The Plaintiff replies That long before the King had any thing in the Manor Queen Elizabeth was seized in Fee in Jure Coronae who by her Steward at such a Court granted the Land in question by Copy to him in Fee Habend c. secundum consuet c. who was admitted and entred Confessing and avoyding Per Cur. the Replication is good and the Plaintiff need not Traverse the Grant alledged in the Bar by the Defendant for the Plaintiff hath confessed and avoided the Defendants Title by a former Copy granted by Queen Elizabeth and so need not traverse and as no man can have a Lease for years without assignment no more can a man have a Copy without a Grant made in Court Cro. Jac. p. 299. Rice and Harrison 1 Brownl p. 147. mesme Case The Plaintiffs Replication is good without any Traverse for how can the Defendant have this when as the Plaintiff had it before as by his Replication appears for that his Lease being first in time avoids the Defendants Lease being the latter and therefore the Defendant in this case ought to have rejoyned and so to have traversed the first Lease but by his Demurrer to the Replication he hath confessed the Lease under which the Plaintiff claims mesme Case 2 Bulstrode p. 1. 6 Rep. Helliar's Case A man pleads a descent of a Copy-hold in Fee the Defendant to take away the descent pleaded That the Ancestor did Surrender to the Use of another Traversing the dying seized absque hoc That the Copy-holder died seized Per Cur. the Traverse is ill because that he traversed that which needed not to be traversed for being Copy-hold and having pleaded a Surrender of it Difference between that and at Common Law the Party cannot have it again if not by Surrender But if a man plead
At the Court Baron of the Honour of Hampton J. S. and J. D. Tenants of the Honour of Hampton do present An Honour That J. R. did Surrender into the Hands of two Tenants of the Honour Per Jones This being a Court of the Honour and into the Hands of the Tenants of the Honour it s not good but by the other three Justices its good enough For Toddington being in the Margent it shall be said a distinct Court by it self For an Honour consisteth of many Manors yet all the Courts for the Manors are distinguished and have several Copyholders Cro. Car. 366. Seagood and Hone. Special Verdict was That Copy-holder of Inheritance bargained and sold his Copy-hold Land c. to the Lessee of the Manor and this was by Indenture and the Indenture was to this effect Verdict found not according to the Indenture That he bargained and sold all his Lands and Tenements as well Copy-holds as other Lands bought of John Culpepper in such a Town but it is not found by the Verdict nor averred by the Party That the Land was bought of John Culpepper and so ill Winch Rep. p. 67. Hasset and Hanson Custom not well found A Copy-holder of Inheritance made a Letter of Attorny to two Joyntly and severally to Surrender his Copy-hold Lands in Fee to certain Uses after his death but the Verdict doth not find that the two Attornies were custumary Tenants nor doth it appear that they were customary Tenants at the time of the Admittance and the primier possession will make a disseisin by the Defendant if the Custom be not well found It is not found that the two Attornies were customary Tenants but it was objected here is so much found as shall make it to be presumed that they were Tenants of the Manor for it is found that the party is admitted secundum consuetud Manerij which cannot be a good Admittance if they were not Tenants But Rolls answered to be admitted secundum consuetudinem goes to the Admittance not to the Letter of Attorny the Custom is not good neither is it found that the Land is demisable at the will of the Lord c. and so it may be free Land and the Custom reaches it not Stiles p. 311. Wallis and Bucknal The Plaintiff entitles himself to have Common of Pasture c. to his Copy-hold and the Custom was traversed it was found he ought to have the same Common but that every Copy-holder used to pay time out of mind c. pro ead communia unam gallinam quinque ova annuatim upon this Verdict the Plaintiff shall have Judgment Failure of Custom found this is not a common sub modo for the Ter-Tenant had remedy for the Hen and Eggs by distress and it is not parcel of the Issue but had the Jury found that the Plaintiff shall have Common paying so many Hens and Eggs the Issue had been against him and it had been parcel of the Custom it s not Modus Communiae but collateral recompence One prescribes to carry Water out of the River the Jury find he ought to have this paying 6 d. yearly Failure of Prsecription found Per Cur. he hath failed of his Prescription for he had prescribed absolutely and the Jury found it conditionally or sub modo and the Ter-Tenant in this Case hath no remedy but by disturbance 5 Rep. 68. Gray's Case If the Issue be whether Jury must find directly and not argumentatively where a Copy-hold is granted to three for the Lives of two he who dies seized c. ought to pay an Harriot Custom and the Jury find there never was a Grant of such Estate within the said Manor This is not well found for this is but an argument that no Harriot ought to be paid but they ought to have found it directly M. 15 Jac. B. R. Ven and Howel If the Issue be whether by the Custom of the Manor a Copy-hold may be granted to three for the Life of two and they find that by the Custom it may be granted for three Lives this is not well found because it is only by Argument because if a greater Estate may be granted a lesser may be So if the Issue be whether a Copy-hold may be granted in Tail and they find it may be granted in Fee mesme Case What shall be intended by the Juries finding if c. then for the Plaintiff Special Verdict upon a Patent from King H. 8. which Patent was adjudged void to pass the Estate the Jury find if it were a good Patent then for the Defendant if otherwise they find for the Plaintiff It is intended there is a sufficient Title found for the Plaintiff unless by this Patent it be defeated If Jury be satisfied the Plaintiff hath Title the Court ought not to doubt thereof so that if the Jury be satisfied that the Plaintiff hath any good Right by any other manner of Title the Court ought not to doubt thereof and so is Goodal's Case 5 Rep. 97. Cro. Car. 21. Castle and Hobbs Custom was pleaded by the Defendant That if a Copy-holder in Fee hath a Wife at the time of his death and two Sons or more that the Wife shall have her Free-Bench during her Life and that if the eldest Son dye living the Wife though he hath Issue his Issue shall not have it Custom must be found in the manner that he pleads it but the second Son The Jury found the Custom that the youngest Son should have it unless the eldest Son was admitted thereto as to the Reversion or made a Fine for it with the Lord in his Life-time Per Cur. The Custom is not found in that manner that he pleaded it therefore it is found against him that pleaded it for he pleaded a general Custom without exception and the Custom found is with an exception and special as the Case is in Dyer 192. Where a Custom was pleaded That a Feme should have it and it was found she should have it Verdict not aptly concluded durante viduitate but in this Case there was not any Verdict upon this Issue for they concluded their Verdict Si c. they found the Defendant guilty if otherwise not guilty and so there is not any conclusion of the point in Issue Per Cur. a gross fault and a Venire Facias de novo was awarded Cro. El. 415. Boraston and Hay In Trespass the Plaintiff in his Replication makes Title That this Land is parcel of the Manor of D. and demisable c. by Copy in Fee in Tail for Life or years c. and the Land was let to him by Copy in Fee Substance found the Prescription was traversed and found that it was demisable c. in Fee but never in Tail and that it was granted to the Plaintiff in Fee this was found for the Plaintiff for the Allegation That the Land was demisable in Fee or in Tail
surrendred all the three Lives and though it was not a Copy-hold in Fee yet it was decreed That the Agreement should be performed and that the Defendant do Surrender to the Plaintiffs Use and an Injunction for quiet enjoyment A Woman Copy-holder for Life took an Husband and the Reversion of the said Copy-hold was granted to three viz. A. B. C. cum acciderit by Surrender or Forfeiture for their Lives successive according to the Custom The Husband doth Surrender to the Use of A. for Life to whom the Lord doth grant a Copy accordingly A. and B. dye and the Opinion of the Court was That C. hath no right to be admitted by the Law nor in Conscience for that after the death of the Husband the Wife may enter and have a Plaint in nature of a Cui in vita contradicere non potest and during the Husbands Life the Lord may have it in the nature of an Occupancy But the Case did proceed farther viz. That the Husband and Wife were willing to release all the Right of the Wife to the surviving Reversioner The Lord Decreed to hold a Court. and the Lord would not receive it nor hold a Court But it was decreed That the Lord should hold his Court and accept their Conveyance or else avoid the Possession thereof Dyer 246. a. Copy-hold Estate in some cases not to be passed but by Decree Where the Lord grants the Reversion of the Copy-holds the Tenant cannot Surrender there being no Dominus servitiorum as the Custom will warrant and he cannot pass his Estate any way but by a Decree in Chancery and this will bind the person only 4 Rep. p. 25. in Murrel's Case vide supra Fines and Rents arrear not relieved after Sale of the Manor Copy-hold Tenant in Fee surrenders to the Use of one for Life Remainder to B. in Fee Tenant for Life dies and B. pays no Fine for his Admittance but after dies and this descends to his Son and after his Son surrenders to the Use of J. S. in Fee and no Fine paid for it and also the Rents for divers years are behind and after the Lord grants the Manor in Fee to J. B. and after sues in a Court of Equity for the Fines and Rents due before the Sale of the Manor and alledgeth in his Bill That the Copy-holder had Free Land intermixed with the Copy-hold Land so that he could not know where to Distrain for it yet he shall not be relieved in Equity for this for it is against a Maxim in Law for as much as by his own Act he had destroyed his Remedy P. 10 Car. B. R. Serjeant Hicham Plaintiff and Finch and Block Defendants and a Prohibition was granted to the Court of Requests where the Suit was Gold versus Dore Martis 23. Oct. 2 Jac. The Plaintiff delivered to the Defendant an 100 l. to buy a Copy-hold in the Defendants Name but to the Plaintiffs Use because there were differences between the Lord of the Manor and the Plaintiff so as the Plaintiff had no hopes to prevail for himself and when the Copy-hold should be obtained then the Trust was That the Defendant should Surrender the same to the Use of the Plaintiff The Defendant accordingly bought the Copy-hold Trustee refusing to surrender according to his Trust not relieved and took it in his own name and his Childrens but afterwards would not surrender it to the Use of the Plaintiff notwithstanding the same was bought with the Plaintiffs mony for this the Plaintiff Exhibited his Bill in Chancery and this appearing to be the true state of the Case my Lord would not relieve the Plaintiff because he said he would never ground a Decree upon a Lye a Falsity it appearing to him that this packing was used to thrust a Tenant upon the Lord whom he liked not and so dismist the Cause Tracy versus Noel M. 2 Jac. Copy-holder in Fee takes a Lease the Manor is sold Copy-holder not relieved though the Purchaser had notice A Copy-holder of Inheritance took a Lease for years of his Copy-hold from the Lord of the Manor the Lord sold his Manor to J. S. who had notice of this Copy-hold of Inheritance yet would not this Court relieve the Copy-holder his Lease being ended for by Law his Copy-hold Estate is determined Robes Purchased the Inheritance of a Copy-hold in the Name of B. and another in Trust B. surrendred his moiety to the Use of his own Son and the other died seized The Son of B. and the Heir of the other for mony sold the Copy-hold to C. for 50 l. being of the value of 80 l. Robes sued the Son of B. and the Heir of the other and C. in Chancery for the 80 l. It was decreed That A. should recover this 50 l. only from B. and the Heir of the other No Recompence for the over-value of an Estate because no Fraud and C. should be discharged of it and hold it in peace But if notice had been proved in C. Robes shall have the Land and no recompence for the over-value was given against the Vendors because no Fraud Moor Rep. n. 745. Kobes Bent and Cock's Case Copy-hold devised without Surrender executed by Decree in Chancery A Copy-hold devised without Surrender it cannot be executed in point of Interest but only by Decree in Chancery by a Concessum in 2 Keb. 837. Harrison's Case A Copy-hold granted out of a Manor confirmed Court Rolls produced A Copy-hold granted at a Court kept out of the Manor confirmed against the Lord who made it Tothil 107. Mark contra Suliard In Corbet and Peshal's Case 12 Jac. it was Ordered That Court Rolls should be brought and shewed to Councel to shew which is Copy-hold and which is Free-hold Composition Decreed Sterling's Case a Composition formerly made between Lords and Tenants Decreed to bind a Purchasor or an Heir 9 Car. Bill in Chancery to reverse a Faux Judgment in the Lords Court If an erroneous Judgment be given in a Copy-hold Court of a common Lord in a Formedon a Bill may be exhibited in Chancery in nature of a Faux Judgment to reverse it Pateshull's Case in Scaccario 1 Rolls Abridgment 373. Admission by Letter of Attorny Copy-holder ought not to be admitted to a Copy-hold Estate by Letter of Attorny for he ought to do Fealty at the time of his Admittance which must be done in person 21 Car. 2. Flyer and Hedgingham Fines certain or not having been tryed at Law no farther Relief here Smith contra Sallet 24 Car. 2. Fines of Copy-holders whether certain or arbitrary it having been tryed at Law and in two Tryals Verdict for Fines certain This Court would not relieve the Plaintiff other than for the preservation of Witnesses and so dismist the Plaintiffs Bill it being to have an Issue directed to try whether certain or not Morgan versus Scudamore 29 Car. 2. The Lord limitted to a
two years full value for a Fine The Lord was limitted to a two years value for a Fine though the Fines were Arbitrary and the Custom was to renew but every 99 years but the Copy-holders decreed to renew their Estates within one year after the Term. Barker contra Hill 33 Car. 2. Heir Decreed to surrender upon a Contract with the Ancestor Surrender by Infant of five years old Upon a Contract for Copy-hold Estate and Purchase-mony paid the bargainor dies before Surrender his Heir decreed to Surrender Nayler contra Strode The Surrender of a Copy-hold Estate by an Infant of 5 years old allowed by this Court Precedents in Chancery A Bill for the quieting the possession of a Copy-holder where the Copies and Court Rolls are lost and to have Witnesses examined Conveyancers Light 258. A Bill for entring and detaining Copy-hold Lands by reason of the detaining the Writings thereof Wests Presidents Edit 1647. PRESIDENTS c. A Settlement before Marriage of a Copy-hold Estate where according to the Custom of the Manor there is a dead Year after the death of every Tenant grantable by the Tenant in his Life-time and his Widow enjoys the Estate durante castitate if he surrender or alien it not in his Life-time with permission That the Goods of the Wife shall remain at her disposal and that her Husbands Name may be made use of to sue for her Debts but the Monies to be secured by the Trustees to her Use THIS Indenture Tripartite made c. between M. F. of c. Widow late Wife and Relict of E. F. late of c. Gentleman deceased on the first Party and T. S. of c. Gentleman on the second Party and E. L. of c. Gentleman T. B. of c. J. B. of c. Gentleman on the third Part. Whereas the said M. is now possessed in a personal Estate of Mony Debts owing by Bond and Securities and otherwise above the value of 300 l. and of Goods Chattels and Utensils of Houshold Stuff according to the Inventory or Note of particulars hereof hereunto annexed expressed And whereas the said T. S. is now seized in possession of a Copy-hold Estate of Lands and Tenements for term of his Life lying and being in S. within the Manor of W. in the said County of c. of the yearly value of 40 l. or thereabouts by vertue of a Copy of Court-Roll and Grant of the said Copy-hold Premisses by R. B. then Serjeant at Law at a Court of the said Manor of him the said R. B. holden the _____ day _____ in the year _____ as by the said Copy under the Hand and Seal of him the said R. B. and subscribed by S. F. his then Steward appeareth unto which Copy-hold Premisses there is a dead year belonging according to the Custom of the said Manor after the death of the Tenant thereof dying seized in possession disposable by such Tenant in his Life-time or else to be enjoyed by his Executors or Administrators And whereas also by the Custom of the said Manor the Wife of such Tenant if she survive him is to hold and enjoy the said Copy-hold Estate during the time of her Widowhood keeping her self chast And whereas a Marriage is intended to be had and solemnised between the said T. S. and the said M. F. It is agreed between all the said Parties to these presents and the said T. S. for himself his Heirs Executors and Administratrators doth Covenant Promise and Grant to and with the said E. L. T. B. J. B. and J. P. and to and with every of their Executors and Administrators That he the said T. S. shall not and will not surrender yield up or make void the said Copy-hold Estate whereby she the said M. may be defeated of her Widows Estate in the same Copy-hold Premisses after the death of him the said T. S. if the said Marriage take effect and in case she shall him survive And also the said T. B. doth hereby Grant to the said E. L. T. B. J. B. and J. P. and the survivor of them the dead year of the said Copy-hold Premisses to hold to them and the survivor of them immediately from and after the death of him the said T. S. in Trust for her the said M. in case the said Marriage take effect and she survive him the said T. S. And the said T. S. doth also Covenant Grant and agree to and with the said E. L. T. B. J. B. and J. P. and to and with every of them their and every of their Executors and Administrators That he the said T. S. his Executors Administrators and Assigns shall not intermeddle with claim That he will intermeddle with no more of the Wives Estate then 300 l. take or dispose of any other the aforesaid Estate Personal Mony Goods or Chattels of the said M. saving only the sum of 300 l. in mony and no more but that the said T. S. shall be contented and satisfied with the aforesaid sum of 300 l. in mony and no no more as a full Marriage Portion to him with the said M. if the said Marriage shall take effect That she may dispose of it by Will c. And that the said M. shall have full power by her last Will or otherwise to dispose of all or any the rest of her Estate to any other person or persons other than the said T. S. without any contradiction of him the said T. S. to hinder or let the same And the said M. F. by and with the consent of the said T. S. as well in consideration of c. to her paid by the said E. D. T. B. J. B. and J. B. or one of them as also to preserve the Interest and Property of all and singular the Goods Chattels and Implements of Houshold now of her the said M. in the Schedule or Note of particulars thereof hereunto annexed specified so that he the said T. S. may not have any power or disposal of them She the said M. hath given granted bargained and sold and doth hereby give grant bargain sell and deliver unto the said E. L. T. D. J. B. and J. P. their Executors Administrators or Assigns all and singular the said Goods Chattels and Implements of Houshold To have and to hold to them their Executors Administrators and Assigns for ever And the said T. S. for himself his Heirs Executors and Administrators doth Covenant Promise and Grant to and with the said E. L. J. B. T. B. and J. P. and to and with every of them their Executors and Administrators That whereas she the said M. hath divers sums of Mony owing unto her upon Bonds Specialties and otherwise above the sum of 300 l. That for recovery of the said Debts if need require he the said T. S. shall permit and suffer the Trustees aforesaid The Husband to permit Trustees to make use of his name to sue for his Wives Debt or any Attorny or
Attornies by their appointment in the Name or Names of them the said T. S. and M. in case the same Marriage take effect to commence Suit against sue and prosecute all and every the person or persons as occasion shall require for all every of any the said monies that are now owing to the said M. And that he the said T. S. shall justifie all and every such Actions and Suits That he shall not release the Action and shall not Release or discharge the same or any Judgment or Judgments or Execution thereupon to be had without the consent of the said Trustees but shall suffer the said Trustees to receive the same monies and every Sum thereof That what is received shall be at her disposal and all and other the Sum and Sums above the Sum of 300 l. and to preserve and dispose of the same according to the Trust in them reposed by the aforeseid M. And that the said M. shall have full power of the disposal thereof to any person or persons other than the said T. S. without any contradiction of him the said T. S. or any threats or uncivil carriage to deter her thereunto That neither of the Estates be charged with the others Debts due before Marriage And it is farther agreed by and between the said T. S. and M. F. That neither of them nor their Estates shall be charged with the Debts or Engagements of either of the other of them due or payable before the date of these presents And to that end the said T. S. doth covenant promise and grant to and with the said Trustees before named and to and with every of them That he will pay and discharge all his own particular Debts or which he is bound for or stands chargable to pay to any person or persons out of his own particular Estate without having or craving any of the now personal Estate of her the said M. other than the aforesaid 300 l. before mentioned If there appear any Debts on her part Trustees to pay them out of her personal Estate in their Hands And also the said M. F. doth hereby agree That in case the said T. S. after the said intended Marriage shall take effect and be solemnized shall be questioned or molested for any the proper Debts of her the said M. contracted or owing by her before the solemnization of the said intended Marriage or for any Legacy or Legacies which she is any ways chargable to pay to any person or person That the Trustees shall have power and authority hereby to pay and discharge the said Debts and Legacies which she the said M. is so chargable to pay and that out of any her now proper Estate other than the aforesaid 300 l. and in so doing the Trustees shall be discharged of any other account thereof unto the said M. or to the said T. S. after the solemnization of the said intended Marriage And the said Trustees and every of them do hereby declare That they will perform the Trust in them reposed by these presents according to the true intent and meaning thereof And do hereby Covenant every one of them one with the other respectively not to act or do any thing touching the Premisses without the consent of them all In Witness whereof to the first part of these presents remaining with the said T. S. the said M. F. and the said Trustees have put their Hands and Seals to the second part of these Indentures remaining with the said Trustees the said M. F. and T. S. have put their Hands and Seals to the third part of these Indentures remaining with the said M. F. the said T. S. and the said Trustees have put their Hands and Seals the day and year first above written Covenant to Surrender Copy-hold Land after a Bargain and Sale of Free-hold And whereas the said I. W. holdeth to him and his Heirs by Copy of Court Roll at the Will of the Lord according to the Custom of the Manor of S. aforesaid the said Parcel of Land in S. aforesaid before excepted It is Covenanted and agreed by and between the said Parties to these presents and the said I. W. for himself his Heirs Executors and Administrators for the Considerations aforesaid doth Covenant to and with the said H. A. RG and I. A. their Heirs and Assigns by these presents That he the said I. W. shall and will before the Feast of St. John Baptist now next ensuing surrender according to the Custom of the said Manor the said Parcels of customary Lands before excepted unto the use and behoof of the said H. A. R. G. and I. A. and their Heirs for ever and procure them to be admitted unto the same accordingly To hold according to the Custom of the said Manor freed and discharged of all Forferfeitures Charges and Incumbrances done or suffered by him the said J. W. or F. W. his Father or either of them In Witness c. Covenant that he is rightfully seized of Copy-hold Land And the said A. B. for the Considerations aforesaid doth for himself his Heirs Executors Administrators and Assigns and for every of them covenant promise and grant to and with the said I. G. his Heirs and Assigns by these presents that he the said A. B. now at the sealing and delivery of this c. is solely lawfully and rightfully seized of and in all and singular the said Copy-hold Lands and Premisses herein before mentioned to be granted with their c. Appurtenances of a good Estate in Fee-simple according to the Custom of the Manor of which the same Premisses are holden If the Copy-holds belong to two Manors then thus of a good Estate in Fee-simple according to the Custom of the several Manors of which the said Premisses are respectively holden Covenant to Surrender Copy-hold Lands And also that he the said A. B. or his Heirs shall and will at the next Court-Baron to be held for the Manor of W. in the said County c. or at any other time or times upon the request of the said I. G. his Heirs or Assigns but at the proper Costs and Charges of the said A. B. or his Heirs surrender into the Hands of the Lord of the Manor or to the Steward thereof or otherwise according to the Custom of the said Manor to the use of the said I.G. his Heirs and Assigns all those Lands Tenements and Hereditaments herein after mentioned which he the said A. B. doth hold of the said Manor aforesaid by Copy of Court Roll according to the Custom of the said Manor viz. one piece of Land called c. And all other the Copy-hold or customary Lands of the said A. B. held of the said Manor of W. And the said A. B. for himself c. doth farther Covenant c. to and with the said I. G. his Heirs and Assigns c. that he the said A. B. his Heirs Executors or Administrators shall and will pay the Fines
due for Admittances of the said I. G. or his Heirs into the said Copy-hold Lands unto the Lords of the said Manors respectively And that he the said A. B. and his Heirs from time to time and at all times hereafter within the space of seven years next ensuing the date hereof c. at and upon the reasonable Request and proper Costs and Charges in the Law of the said I. G. his Heirs or Assigns shall and will make and do all and every such farther and other lawful and reasonable acts and things for the farther better and more perfect assuring and conveying all and singular the said Copy-hold Lands and Tenements and all other the Copy-hold Lands of the said A. B. in the County of S. to or to the Use of the said I. G. his Heirs or Assigns or by his or their Councel learned in the Law shall be reasonably devised or advised and required And that at the time of such Surrender or Surrenders or other Assurance or Assurances to be made of the same Copy-hold Lands and Premisses all and singular the said Copy-hold Lands and Premisses so to be surrendred or otherwise conveyed as aforesaid shall be free and clear and freely and clearly and absolutely acquitted freed and discharged of and from all former Surrenders and Forfeitures and other Incumbrances whatsoever had made done or wittingly and willingly suffered by him the said A. B. or by any other person and persons whatsoever one Lease made by the Licence of the Lord of the Manor aforesaid to K. F. c. of c. of one Copy-hold Messuage c. excepted A Covenant in nature of a Mortgage upon a Surrender of Copy-hold Land to pay mony at a certain time This Indenture made c. between Sir T. D. of P. c. of the one part and I. H. of c. of the other part Witneseth That whereas the said Sir T. D. hath now lately surrendred into the Hands of the Lord or Lords of the Manor of W. in the said County of S. by the Rod according to the Custom of the said Manor by the Hands and acceptanc of R. C. and E. M. two of the customary Tenants of the said Manor all that Messuage c. To the Use of the said I. H. his Heirs and Assigns to hold according to the Custom of the said Manor with a proviso and upon condition That if the said Sir T. D. his c. shall and do well and truly pay or cause to be paid c. at c. then the said Surrender to be void and of none effect as by a Note or Memorandum of the said Surrender taken out of the Court the day of the date hereof relation c. more plainly appeareth Now the said Sir T. D. doth for himself his Heirs Executors and Administrators Covenant c. to and with the said I. H. his Executors and Administrators by these presents to pay the Mony at the day and place and in manner and form in the said Proviso or Condition of the said Surrender before recited limited and appointed for the payment thereof And farther also That the said Sir T. D. at the time of the making of the said Surrender before recited had a good Estate of Inheritance in Fee-simple according to the Custom of the said Manor of W. of and in all and singular the said Messuages c. before mentioned to be surrendred and had good right and lawful and absolute power and authority in himself to surrender the same and every part thereof unto the said I. H. and his Heirs in manner and form aforesaid and that the same are free from all former Surrenders and Incumbranses whatsoever In default of payment I. H. and his Heirs to enjoy the Premisses for ever After default in payment Sir T. D. covenants for farther Assurance be it by Fine or Recovery according to the Custom of the said Manor Surrender Release or Confirmation or all or any of the said wayes or means in the Law whatsoever as by the said I. H. his Heirs or Assigns or his or their Councel learned in the Law shall be reasonably devised advised or required Till default of payment I. H. to permit and suffer Sir T. D. to enjoy c. A Bargain and Sale of Copy-hold Lands by Commissioners of Bankrupts This Indenture c. Between A. B. c. the Commissioners of the one part and C. D. c. Assignees of the other part Whereas the King and Queens Majesties Commission under the Great Seal of England grounded upon the several Statutes made concerning Bankrupts bearing date at Westminster the day of c. last past hath been awarded against E. F. of c. and directed to the said Commissioners thereby giving full power and authority unto the said Commissioners four or three of them whereof the said A. B. and P. B. to be one to execute the same as by the said Commission more at large appeareth And whereas the Commissioners parties to these presents or the major part of them or the major part of the Commissioners by the said Commission authorized having begun to put the said Commission in Execution upon due examination of Witnesses and other good proof and upon Oath before them taken do find That the said E. D. hath for the space of six years last past or thereabouts used and exercised the Trade and profession of a c. in buying and selling of c. at his House and Shop in S. aforesaid and sought and endeavoured to get his living by buying and selling And that the said E. F. so seeking and endeavouring to get his living by buying and selling during the time of his said Trading did become justly and truly indebted and still doth owe and stand indebted unto the above-named C. D. and other his Creditors in the sum of c. and being so indebted he the said E. F. did in the judgment of the said Commissioners parties to these presents become Bankrupt to all intents and purposes within the compass true intent and meaning of several Statutes made concerning Bankrupts or within some or one of them before the date and suing forth the said Commission And whereas also the said Commissioners parties to these presents or the major part of the Commissioners by the said Commission authorized having also found out and discovered that he the said E. F. at the time and since he became Bankrupt was and stood seized to him and his Heirs according to the Custom of the Manor of L. in the County of L. of and in c. All which Copy-hold or customary Premisses the greater part of the above-named Commissioners by the said Commission authorized have caused to be viewed and rented and the same to be appraised to the best value they can or may and accordingly the same have been viewed rented and appraised by R. S. and T. V. men of sufficient skill and ability for the doing thereof in manner and form following that is to say
c. as by the particular appraisment sent to the said Commissioners it may appear the value whereof in the total amounts to the sum of c. Now this Indenture witnesseth That the said Commissioners parties to these presents by force and vertue of the said Commission and of the several Acts of Parliament therein mentioned and evpressed for and with the consent and at the request of the Creditors of the said E. F. that have sued forth and prosecuted the said Commission against the said E. F. for and in consideration of the sum of c. unto the said Commissioners by the said C. D. c. to the use benefit and behoof as well of themselves as also of all other the Creditors of the said E. F. that have sued forth and joyned and that shall hereafter in due time joyn in the prosecution of the said Commission according to the Statutes in that behalf made and provided well and truly contented and paid have by force and virtue of the said Commission as much as in them the said Commissioners lyeth and they lawfully may granted bargained and sold and by these presents do as much as in them lyeth and they lawfully may grant bargain and sell unto the said C. D. c. all the aforesaid Copy-hold or customary Messuage c. now in the occupation of c. holden by Copy of Court Roll of the aforesaid Manor of W. together with all Woods Under-woods Commons Pastures c. and Appurtenances whatsoever unto all and every the said Copy-hold or other customary Premisses thereby granted and every part and parcel thereof belonging or in any wise appertaining and all the Estate Right Title Interest Use Possession Reversion and Reversions Remainder and Remainders Claim and Demand whatsoever of the said E. F. of in and to all and singular the Premisses hereby granted and every part and parcel thereof To have and to hold all the said Copy-hold or customary Messuage or Tenement c. with their and every of their Appurtenances to their proper use and behoof for ever according to the Custom of the said Manor of L. Yeilding paying performing and doing unto the said Lord of the aforesaid Manor of whom the Copy-hold or customary Premisses hereby granted are holden all and every the Fines Rents Duties and Services of right used and accustomed to be yeilded paid performed and done for the same c. In Witness c. A Surrender in Trust and the Trust declared Trustees Covenant not to commit c. any thing that may amount to a Forfeiture Whereas the said A. B. hath with his own proper Monies bought and purchased of C. D. of c. Lord of the Manor of Belton in the County of c. amongst other Lands and Tenements in certain Articles indented and made between the said C. D. of the one part and the said A. B. of the other part and bearing date the c. the customary Messuage Lands Tenements and Hereditaments hereafter mentioned that is to say c.. And whereas also the said E. F. G. H. and I. K. customary Tenants of the said Manor of and in the customary Messuage Lands and Premisses did by Surrender bearing date c. according to the Custom of the said Manor surrender into the Hands of the said C. D. Lord of the Manor aforesaid all and singular the customary Messuage Lands Tenements and Hereditaments before mentioned to the use and behoof of them the said I. S. and P. S. their Heirs and Assigns to the intent and purpose that the said C. D. or other the Lord or Lords of the said Manor of c. or the Steward or Stewards of the said Manor for the time being at the next Court to be holden for the said Manor should admit or cause to be admitted them the said I. S. and P. S. Tenants of and to all and singular the said c. as by the said Surrender relation being thereto had may more at large appear Now this Indenture farther Witnesseth That the said I. S. and P. S. for the avoiding and clearing all doubts questions and ambiguities which may hereafter arise or grow touching or concerning the said Surrender taken in their Names as aforesaid do and either of them doth by these presents voluntarily and spontaneously acknowledge express and declare That the said Surrender so had and taken as aforesaid was had taken passed and done by the special direction and appointment of the said A. B. in trust to and for the only use benefit and behoof of him the said A. B. his Heirs and Assigns for ever and to and for none other use intent or purpose whatsoever And farther the said J. S. and P. S. do for themselves their Heirs and Assigns freely and absolutely disclaim any other Estate Right Title Interest Claim or Demand of in to or out of the said customary Messuage Lands and Tenements and Premisses or any part thereof but such only as they have by virtue of the Surrender aforesaid in and upon the Trust aforesaid And the said I. S. and P. S. for themselves their Heirs Executors and Assigns do covenant and grant to and with the said A. B. his Heirs Executors and Assigns that they the said I.S. and P. S. their Heirs or Assigns shall not and will not at any time or times hereafter act do permit or willingly or wittingly suffer any act matter or thing whatsoever that may amount to or cause a Forfeiture of the said Premisses or any part thereof or whereby the said Premisses or any part thereof may be destroyed extinguished impeached or incumbred In Witness c. An Infranchisement of Copy-hold Lands made by a Lord of a Manor to his Copy-holder This Indenture made c. Between A. B. of c. Esquire and E. B. of c. Gentleman Son and Heir apparent of the said A. B. Lord of the Manor of H. in the County of Norfolk of the one part and T. P. of c. R. S. of c. and T. P. of c. of the other part Witnesseth That the said A. B. and E. B. as well for and in consideration of the sum of c. of lawful mony to them the said A. B. and E. B. or one of them in hand paid by the said T. P. R. S. and T. P. at and before the ensealing and delivery of these presents the receipt whereof they the said A. B. and E. B. do by these presents acknowledge and thereof and of every part and parcel thereof do acquit exonerate and discharge the said T. P. R. S. and T. P. and every of them their and every of their Heirs Executors and Administrators for ever by these presents as also for divers other good Causes and Considerations them and either of them hereunto especially moving Have granted bargained sold enfeoffed delivered aliened and confirmed and by these presents do grant bargain sell enfeoff deliver alien and confirm unto the said T. P. R. S. and T. P. their Heirs