driuen to sue liuerie Further then let vs see in what cases the kinge shall haue annum diem et vastum and in what not The kinge shall not haue annum diem et vastum of clerks coÌ„uict after verdit because hee forfetes no land Like lawe is it of lands in Gauelkinde where the father is hanged but otherwise it is if he be outlawed or abiured for felonie for there the kinge shal haue the yeare daie wast and this appereth 3. 3. E. 3. in Fitz ti corone P. 332. et Prescription P. 50. E. 3. et 8. E. 2. If the husband be atteinted of felonie the kinge shall haue the yeare daye and wast of the laÌ„ds of the wife and yet in the case the lordes shall not haue theyr eschetes But what then the husbaÌ„d might haue done wast and the wife had had no remedie for the same and by the same reason the kinge maye doe as much and this appeareth 3. 3. E. 3. in Fitz ti corone P. 327. E. 3. And also in Bracton in his second boke And also it shoulde there appeare that the wiefe is driuen to sue anouster le main after the death of her husbande If one be arested for felonie brekes the arest so that in the pursuyt of him he is killed because hee woulde not otherwise be taken 3. E. 3. in Fitz ti Corone P. 312. et 290 et 308. the king in this case shal haue the yere day and wast as it appereth 3. E. 3. If a man coÌ„mit felonie and hathe his charter of pardon yet the king shal haue the yeare day wast and the lordes theyr eschetes this appereth 3. E. 3. for the pardoÌ„ doth not restore him but to the lawe For though the kinge would pardon him with words of restitucion yet his grace could not therby restore him to the laÌ„ds holdeÌ„ of other And note that the king shal haue the yere 3. E. 3. in Fitz ti Corone P. 310. day wast of laÌ„ds in ancieÌ„t demesne if it so be that the tenaÌ„t myght haue sold the said lands against the will of the lord as it appereth 3. E. 3. and that notwtstanding that the sayd lands were alwayes vsed to be surrendred by the rodde to passe by surreÌ„der The words of the statute be further Exceptis hominibus quoruÌ„daÌ„ priuilegiatoruÌ„ indâ— ê‘regeÌ„ 46. E. 3. f. 14. 1. H. 6 fo 12. M. 8. H. 4. f. 1 Corone 31. That is as much to say except such as haue Bona et cattalla felonuÌ„ by the kynges graunte for a man can not prescribe to haue Bona et catalla felonuÌ„ as appereth 46. E. 3. 1. H. 7. 8. H. 4. nor none may haue this prerogatiue of yere day wast but only the kinge although hee would claime it by charter froÌ„ the kinge or otherwise as it appereth 3. E. 3. But when the king is seised of it he may coÌ„mit it ouer as appereth by Bracton in his sayd 2. boke But if the land wherof the kinge should haue the yere day and wast be vnder the yerely value of iii s .iiii. d it is vsed to bee remitted for the smallnesse and simplenesse of the thinge as appereth 3. E. 3. 3. E. 3. in Fitz ti Corone P. 327. for it shoulde cost more the suing of it out of the kinges handes than the thing is worth And note the custoÌ„e of Gloc ' comprised in this statut wherby it should appere that notwithstanding any such custome yet the king should haue annuÌ„ et dieÌ„ but not so of laÌ„ds in Gauelkinde as I haue sayd before ¶ Proces to bee sued after the deathe of the kinges tenaunt in chiefe By a statute made in the 33. yere of the late kinge of most famous memorie H. 8. the 22. chapter it is ordeined and prouided amoÌ„ge other things that no person or persons hauing lands or tenemeÌ„ts aboue the yerely value of fiue poundes shal haue or sue any liuerie before inquisitioÌ„ or office fouÌ„d before theschetour or other commissioner or commissioners by vertue of the kinges writ or commission too bee directed out of the kinges chauÌ„cerie or other courtes hauing authoritie to mak suche writes or commissions for suinge of liueries which writs or commissions shal not passe out of the chancerie nor any other courts but by a warrant or bill too bee assigned and subscribed with the handes and names of the master of the kinges wardes and liueries surueiour of his liueries or the attourne and resceiuor of the court of the wardes and liueries or three twoo or one of them to bee directed deliuered to the chanceller of England or to any other chanceler or officer hauiÌ„g power to awarde such writes And if the lands or tenements wherof any inquisition is to be had by vertue of any such writ or commission excede the yerely value of fiue poundes that then such as sue for such writes and commissions shal pay for the seale and writing therof such fees as hath ben accustomed And if the sayd laÌ„ds tenemeÌ„ts wherof any such inquisicions and offices ar to be found by vertue of any such writ or commission excede not the sayde yerely value of v pounde theÌ„ such as shal sue for such writs or commissions shall paye for the seale of euery of them vi d and for the writinge vi d and not aboue This statut doth not set fourth the name of the writ or coÌ„missioÌ„ that shal bee sued howbeit these words that follow that is to sayr for suinge of liueries do somwhat open the minde of the makers of this statute and declare that their meaninge was of the diem clausit and such other writs or coÌ„missions as serue for that purpose and not of euery writ or coÌ„missioÌ„ for so might an office be found by a wroÌ„g writ or coÌ„missioÌ„ which should want mater or be other wise insufficient to make liueries But learne and enquire if after a good writ or coÌ„missioÌ„ sued fourth the office that is found is not sufficient whether the partie shal haue his liueri or not without suing a melius inquirenduÌ„ or a new office because that some parauenture wil say that the words of the statut be performed that is to wite an office or inquisition is found But to that it may be answered and sayd that that it is no office when it is insufficient at least wise toward the partie that should sue liuerie therupon although it be a good office toward the kinge if any thing therin conteined be for his benefit And learne also if the kinges tenant dye seised of landes in diuerse counties whether by force of this statut he shal cause an iÌ„quisitioÌ„ or office to be fouÌ„d in eueri couÌ„tie where the lands lye for so is it vsed to be done vpoÌ„ al general liueries he that sueth his general liuerie otherwise missueth the same and is an intruder vpon the kiÌ„gs possessioÌ„ howbeit peraueÌ„ture you wil say that
firste chapter Also Britton an other old wryter which wrote hys booke in king Edwarde the first name sayeth des heirs nequedent si ils y eyent ascuns qui auncestre morust seisie de ascun terre tenu de nous en chief des aunciens demeanes de nostre corone volons auer les gardes de touts les terres dōt appent que deiuent descend a ceux heirs come lour heritage ouesque touts les blees en teles terres troues maintefoits de qui fees que les terres sont Britton here not only agreeth with the other but also geueth the king the corne growing vpon the groundes which the kinges tenant holdeth at the tyme of his death A. 21. H. 3. in Fitz. ti Prerogat ' P. 26. P. 25. Also in the great Abridgement of Fitzherbert you shal find in the time of king Henry the thirde written in this manner Nota quod lex angliae et consuetudo eiusdē est quod a quibuscunque aliquis feoffatus fuerit dum tamen a domino Rege aliquo tempore fcoffatus fuerit per tenementum qd ' tenetur per seruic̄ militare quod dn̄s rex habebit custod ' omniū terrar ' et tenemētorū tā de feoffamēto aliorū quā de feoffamento proprio Which text if a man will any thing wrest he may make the kinges prerogatiue more lyberall then is made or declared by this statute or any other the writters before remembred for it extendes to any landes holden of the king by knightes seruice whether they be holden of the king in capite or not but forasmuche as the saide other writers haue written so plainlye in this matter we will stand to them and extende the prerogatiue no further howbeit as I saide all those writters being so longe before the making of this statute doe plainly argue proue that this statute dothe but confirme and declare that that was the commen law before M 15. E 4.12 vnles we woulde doubt of the time of the making thereof as Littleton doth in 15. E. 4. but without doubt it was made in king Edward the secondes time and that plainlye appeareth by the woordes contayned in the third chapter of this prerogatiue which be these Et illa voluntas tempore Regis H. patris Regis E. estimari consueuit c. Which woordes were not written in kinge Edward the first daies for then the woords had bene patris nostri so that as I thinke it is not to bee doubted but that it was written in the time aboue limitted and expressed Then go wee to thexposicion of this first chapiter of prerogatiue The woords be dominus rex habebit custodiam omnium terrarum eorum qui de ipso tenent in capite per seruicium militare These woordes go generally to all the kings tenauntes that is to saye aswell to his tenantes for terme of lyfe as to his tenauntes of estate of enheritaunce if it so be that he that is in the reuercion haue the saide reuercion by discent and be heir vnto the said tenant for terme of life not forcing whether he haue the reuercion by discent from the said tenaunt for terme of life or else from any other ancestour as take the case to be this a man holdeth no landes of the kinge but onely as tenaunt by the curtesie and those landes are holden in chiefe by knightes seruice the saide tenaunt by the curtesie is seased in his demesne as of fee of landes holden of other lordes and dieth the landes holden of other discend vnto him in the reuertion whiche is indede nexte heire vnto the said tenant by the curtesie in this case the king shall not onely haue the wardship of the landes that were holden by the curtesie if the saide heire be wythin age but also the landes holden of other by vertue of thys prerogatiue And if the saide heire were of full age at the tyme of the deathe of the saide tenaunt by the curtesie the king shall haue primer season both of the one lande and of the other as it appeareth in the newe Natura breuiū fo 298. Like lawe is it if a woman be indowed of lands holden in capite and is seased in fee simple of landes holden of other and dieth seased and they discende vnto the heire whiche is in the reuercion in this case the kinge shal haue bothe these landes by vertue of this prerogatiue like as hee shall haue in the other case before 26. li. ass p. 57 and that maye you see in 26. li. ass for in bothe these cases they bee the kinges tenauntes and hold of him by knightes seruice in capite for tenaunt en dower in the kinges cas holdeth not of the heire but onelye of the kinge as it shal appeare more fully hereafter But if he in the reuercion bee not heire of the landes holden of other in the cases aboue remēbred otherwise it is But what if he in the reuercion haue the same reuercion by purchace and not by discent whether shall the king then haue his prerogatiue or not and as to that it shoulde seeme by the newe Natura breuium fo 259. that the kinge shall haue his prerogatiue in that case also for there the remainder was to the heire and to his wife and to the heires of theire two bodyes lawfully begotten and the husbande in the remainder dyd sue liuere howbeit against the law as me semeth ideo quere but if the case in the saide newe Natura breuium had been that landes holden by knightes seruice in capite had beene geuen to one for terme of his lyfe the remainder ouer in fee which parson in the remainder hath issue and dyeth and tenaunt for terme of lyfe holdeth landes of other Lordes and dyeth whiche discende to the issue that is in the remainder there it might be saide that the king shoulde haue prerogatiue in the whole like as he had in the cases before remembred of tenaunt by the curtesie and tenant in dower for like reason will serue in the one case that serueth in the other The woordes of the Statut be further de quibus ips◠tenētes fuerunt seisiti in dominico suo vt de feodo die quo obierunt de quocunque tenuerint These woordes rather apperteigne vntoo the landes holden of other then too the Landes holden of the Kinge in Capite as it shoulde appeare by the cases beefore remembred and then by these woordes the kinges tenaunt in his life tyme must himselfe bee seased either in possession or reuercion of those landes that hee holdeth of a common person that shall dyscende vnto his heire For if hee were neuer seased thereof but they discende vnto his heire from some other auncestor the king shall not haue his prerogatiue in them as appeareth in 15. 15. E. 4. f. 10. E. 4. but whether the kinges tenaunt were seased of them in his owne right or in another bodyes right it maketh no difference
as take the case he were seased of them but in right of his wife and hath issue and dyeth his issue is in the kinges warde for the lande that his father helde in Capite and afterwarde the wife dyeth the issue beynge still in warde the Kynge shall haue Prerogatiue in these landes of the wyfe also because the husband was seased of them in his demeane as of fee the daye of his deathe and so wythin the compasse of this statute And this case may you see in M. 13. H. 4. 6. 13. H. 4. and note that notwithstandinge this statute speaketh but of landes yet seruice are to bee taken by the equitie of the same as it is plainlye proued by the woordes of Diem clausit extremum which saieth Quantum terre tenet de nobis aut de aliis tam in dominico quam in seruicio So that if one holde of the kinges tenaunt by certeine seruices the King shal haue the seruices in warde for they be in nature and place of the lande that is holden and so shall it bee supposed And therefore when the kinge hath those seruices in warde and the tenaunt that holdeth by those seruices diâ—th his heire within age if the saide seruices were knightes seruice the Kinge shall haue warde by reason of wardshippe But yet by that noe prerogatiue in the other landes of the second warde whiche are holden of the other Lordes M. 6. R. 2. in Fitz. ti Gard P. 105. as it may appeare in 6. R. 2. For the kinges tenant was neuer seased of those other landes ne yet of the seruice that they were holden by and so without the compasse of this prerogatiue Like lawe it is where the Kinge hath the temporaltie of a bishop in his custody duringe the tyme the Sea is vacant and one that holdeth of those temporalties by knightes seruice dieth his heir wtin age the king shal haue the wardship of him the reason of it is because the king hath the wardship of the teÌ„poralties by reasoÌ„ wherof this wardship cometh whiche temporalties the kinge hath in warde by the order of the common lawe in lure corone For they bee barronies which can be holden of none other then of the kinge in capite and then by the common lawe I take it he were no better then a common person yet his highnes must haue the wardshippe of them that holde of those temporalties by knightes seruice if they falle duringe the time the saied temporalties be in his hands with such landes as they holde of those temporalties but not with such lands as theye holde of other and than must the heire thereof when he coÌ„meth to his ful age sue a liuere as shalmore plainly appeare when we come to the thirde chapiter of this prerogatiue The wordes of the statute before resited are in dominico suo this woorde demeane is not here taken to bee the verie possession or takyng of the profits for if the kinges tenauÌ„t dye seased but of a reuercion or of a remaynder in landes holden of a common person and duringe the minoritye of his sonne the particuler tenaunte dyethe the kynge this notwithstanding shall haue this lande in warde as he hath the rest as it may appeare 22. H. 6.15 E. 4. 46. E. â— M. 22. H. 6. f 20 M. 15. E. 4. f. 10. P. 46. E. 3. fo 10. So it is if the kinges tenaunt dye seased of an aduowson appendaunt to landes holden of a common person The woordes be further die quo obierunt and therefore if the kinges tenaunt dye seased of Landes holden of a commen persone and a straunger abbatethe yet the heire shal bee in warde and the kyng maye entre and so is it if the heire recouer by assise of nâ—ortdauncestre as it appeareth in the newe Natura breuium fol. 2â—â— T. 12. R. 2. But take the case to bee that the kinges tenaunte dye not seased but is disseised and dyethe whether in this case the kynge maye haue prerogatyue or not and it semethe that hee may for in all suche cases where the heire hath a right of entre the kynge may entre in name of the heire and holde it afterwarde in warde but yf the heire haue but a title of entre or ryghte of accion it seemethe to be otherwise howebeit looke for those maâ—â—ers in the sayde booke of 15. E. 4. 12. H. 7. 18. Edwardi tertii lib. ass P. 18. T. 12. H. 7. fo 17. Where it is adiudged that of landes holden of the kynge in chiefe the kynge as in ryghte of hys warde myghte sease by a Scire facias vppon a tytle of entre And note also that there is somewhat more to bee vnderstanden beare thenne is wrytten or expressed that is to saye that the saide Landes muste discende too the kynges warde for notwythestandynge the kynges tenaunt weare seased in hys demeane as of fee daye of hys deathe in landes holden of a commen persone yet if the same after hys deathe doe not discende to the kynges warde but to an other heire M. 12. E. 4. f. 18. the kynge shall not haue prerogatiue in them as it appearethe in 12. Ed. 4. The woordes of the statut bee also De quocunque tenuerunt Put case the kinges tenaunte is seased of certayne thynges whyche neyther are holden of the kynge nor yet of anye other whether shall the kyng haue them in warde or not as Merket warrâ—n A. 3. H. 7. f. 4 21. H. 6. f. 12. 46. E. 3. f. 10. 15. E. 4. f. 12. Rente Secke or aduowson en grosse and as it should appeare in 46. E. 3. 21. H. 6. the kynge cannot haue them in warde and yet in 15. Ed. 4. soome holde oppinion to the contrarye therefore inquere and learne what the lawe wil in these cases The woordes of the statute bee Per huiusmodi seruicium that is to saye by lyke seruice Bye these woordes the landes that are holden of other muste bee holden allso by knyghtes seruice or els the statute extendes not to them and yet the lawe is taken to the contrarye for yf the lands holden of other bee holden but in socage or free burgage the kynge shal haue prerogatiue in them as it appearethe in P. 24. E. 3. f. 13. T. 9. H. 3. ti Prerogatiue in fits â— 25. 24. E. 3. for this statute is but a confirmacion of the common lawe and therefore shall bee taken by equities and namelye when the lawe was so taken in 9. H. 3 whiche was longe time beefore the makyng of this statut Howebeit Bracton and Britton dothe extende this prerogatiue no further then to landes holden of other by knightes seruice therefore enquire for the cause and reason thereof Bracton li. primo de custod et releuiis Britton f. The woordes bee further Exceptis feodis archiepi cantuar ' c. This exception extendes not to the bodie wherefore the kynge shall holde that in warde
record The wordes of the statute be further Et si se maritauerint sine licentia regis tunc rex capiet in manuÌ„ suaÌ„ nomine districtionis oÌ„nes terras et tenÌ„ta quae de eo teneÌ„t in doteÌ„ c. These words be knit in a copulatife to the former wordes contained wtin this chapter that is to saie wher she hath demaÌ„ded dower and is sworne not to marie but yf she will neuer demauÌ„d dower of the lands holden in Capite she may marie wher she wil for the wordes of the statute be quod assignabit viduis dotem si vidue illi voluerint so thinkes Iustice Fitzherbert in his Natura breuium fo 17â— How be it by the boke in .40 40. Li. Ass in Fitz ti gard 40. r. libro Ass it apereth that the wife neuer demaunded dower and yet had alowance of it and did marie also wtout license and yet paied no fine therfore the case was The kings tenant in taile in chiefe made a feffement by licence and toke estate again to him to his wife and died the wife takes an other husband and dies after whose deth the auncient estate taile being found by office the license was holden void because the king was discâ—ued therin and the second baron driuen to aunswere for the mene profets of ii partes of the laÌ„d but not for the third part because she was endowable quod nota A womaÌ„ tenant in dower of no mans assignement some there thought she should forfet her dower because she was partie to the disceit Howebeit this case semeth not to be properlye wtin the coÌ„pas of this statute Also Fitzherbert in the said Natura breuiuÌ„ thinketh that wher the king hath vsed to graunt to other the mariage of his widowes that a composicion with the grantee made for the same whether it be made by the wife or the husbaÌ„d is as good as if it were made with the kinge yet can not the graÌ„tee in such case compell her to marie for the should be contrarie to the statute of Magna carta cap. 7. which wil the she shal not bee constrained to mary by distres but if she will she maie liue sole Howbeit at this daye by the statute of .32 H. 8. cap. 46. the composicion is geuen to the master of the kings wardes liueries with iii. of the couÌ„cel of the said court And likewise aucthoritie is geuen to theÌ„ wher the kinges widowes mary theÌ„ selues wtout license to tax a resonable fyne by their discrecioÌ„s acording to the statute of prerog regis which statute plainlie setteth furth what hath bene vsed to be doon in such cases that is to saie the value of her dower by one yere therw t agrees the new Natura breuiuÌ„ fo 174. And for the fine the king shall sease all the lands tenemeÌ„ts so holden in dower as it aperes by the letter of the statute How beit the Register geueth that the king may sese aswell the land of the husband as of the wife because the mariage is a wrong doon to the kinge but the statute is coÌ„trarie to that therfore Fitzherbert in the said Natura breuiuÌ„ fo 1â—â— thinkes it to be no lawe For as wel might the lands that the woman hath of her inheritaÌ„ce be theÌ„ sesed wherfore no other land ought to be sesid then that she holdeth in dower as it aperes in the said Natura breuium fo 2â—â— And lerne whether the womaÌ„ obtaining dower at the haÌ„ds of the comittee or of the heire of lands holden in capite without making any othe may marie or not without liceÌ„se as me semeth she can not for as sone as she is eÌ„dowed of those laÌ„ds she is the kings tenant not tenaÌ„t to the heir which is in the reuercioÌ„ for if a trespas be done vpoÌ„ the land she shall haue a writ out of the chaÌ„cerie the one such hath entred vpon the kinges possessioÌ„ the auowrie to be made by the king resteth onlie vpoÌ„ her so is the opinioÌ„ of vvood in .1 H. 7. And yet the reuercioÌ„ is in the heier onlie for if she do wast 1. H. 7. fol 3. the heier shall ponish her for it not the kinge TheÌ„ further let vs se of what force this dower is wheÌ„ it is made in the chaÌ„cery how she shal be admesured in the saÌ„e if it be to grete for if it be to litle ther is no remedie for her but to staÌ„d to her owne harmes if she in the chaÌ„cerie once did accept it not forciÌ„g whether she were theÌ„ wtin age or of ful age as it maie apere in 18. E. 3. 29. 18 E. 3. The dowment in the chauncerie is of this force that whether it be by right or by wrong it can not be defeted by waie of plea without a sute made in the chauncerie for the defeting therof 17. E. 3. f. 71. M. 31. E. 3 in Fitz. ti Dovver P. 128. as it apereth iÌ„ the .17 .31 E. 3. And therfore in a verie strong case one doth trauerse the office which is in the chancerie by reason the land is holden of him by knightes seruice and not of the king and hath an ouster le main vna cuÌ„ exitibus yet if she were endowed before in the chancerie vpoÌ„ the office her dower remayneth vndefeted notwtstanding this trauerse and ouster le main vntil an other sute be made in the chauncerie for the defeting of the same Howbeit in this case if the dower be to much the lord that tended the trauers maie haue a writ of admesurement at the comon lawe and so cause it to be admesured wtout suing to the king for the saÌ„e For it is no losse to his highnes though she be admesured seing the land is not holden of of him as it apereth 7 R. 2. 7. R. 2. l Fitz ti Admesur P. 4. and there it is agreed that the heir shall haue a writ of admesurement of assinement of dovver made by his auncestor quere tamen But the abatour shal not haue a writ of admesurement nor garden en fait of assinement made bye garden endroit nor if the heir within age the garden of his heire shall not haue a writ of admesurement But take the case to be that a woman is endowed in the chancerie the rest of the land there remaininge still in the kinges handes yf it be surmised by the heir or any other for the king that the land assined to the wife is not extended to the verie value but that it is more in value then it is extended for now vpoÌ„ this surmise there shal be a newe extente made which beinge returned in to the chancery a Scire facias shal be awarded against the woman and if she be warned and come not or apere and saie nothing she shal be newlie endowed as it is said in Natura breuium fo 265. Then let vs see farther at what
away all his purchased landes But of the lands of his inheritaunce he might giue away no more but a reasonable porcion And if the landes were departible amongest the heires males then might the father in his life time geeue euerye childe what porcion hee woulde so it exceded not the porcion that shoulde descend vnto him And in that case whether the gifte were of landes purthased or of inheritaunce it made no matter Howbeit neyther Abbot nor Bishop might iÌ„ any of these cases geue any porcion of their landes away without the kinges assent or his confirmacion because theire baronies bee of the almes of the king or of his progenitours Hitherto haue ye hearde what Glanuill hath saide After this was the Statute of Magna carta made where in the .31 chapter therof it is writen Nullus liber homo det de cetero ampliê° de terra sua vel vendat de cetero quam vt de residuo terre sue possit sufficienter fieri dnÌ„o feodi seruiciuÌ„ ei debituÌ„ quod pertinet ad feoduÌ„ illud Which statute is but a confirmacion of the comon law as it doth appere by that that is written in Glanuil for so one that had helde by knight seruice if he might haue beene suffred to alien the greatest part of his land he would haue aliened the same peraduenture to hold of him but in Socage or by some smal rent than hauing so little a liuelyhod left to himselfe how had he bene then able to haue done the seruice of a knight or a man of warre or what should his lord haue had in ward to haue founde one to haue done that seruice surely little or nothing Wherby the strength of the Realme might haue much decayed therfore it was a reasonable law to restrain him as me semeth Howbeit Bracton in his first booke vnder the title Si ille cui datuÌ„ est rem datam vlterius alteri dare possit disputes this matter after a sorte that is to say whether the tenant may enfeffe an other agaist the lords will or not he there affirmes he may yea that to hold of him by what seruice he will calleth it DamnuÌ„ absque iniuria seing that though the wardship be not so good after alienacion to the chief lord as it was before yet the relief is as good in euery point then if the lord be serued either of the wardship or reliefe he hath all that knightes seruice requireth Howbeit saith he when the tenant is so disposed to sell his land the lorde shal bee preferred to the sale therof before a stranger geuing as muche as an other will It semeth by Bracton that it was verie doubtfull notwithstanding the statut of Magna carta whither the kings tenaÌ„t might alien his whole tenancy or not And therefore was the statute of Quia emptores terr' made where it is prouyded that from thenceforth which is in the .18 yere of kinge E. the first after Bractons tyme it should be lawful for euery fre man to sell his landes or tenementes or any parte therof at his pleasure to holde of the chiefe lorde by the same seruice that the feffour helde Prouided alwaies that by anye suche sales there comes no landes to Mortmaine This statut remedies the mischief that was founde in the wardship but not the other mischiefe that is to saie touching the defence of the realme For when one mans lyuinge is so dismembred neuer a one of them is able to doe the seruice of a man for want of lyuehoâ—e Yea and much more vnabler since this Statute then before For before where he gaue it to hold of himself he reserued somewhat in place of the lande that went from him where as now he can reserue nothing of comen right Howbeit notwithstanding that this statute of Quia emptores terraruÌ„ made it lawfull for all other mens tenauntes Yet was it not lawfull by the said statute for the kings tenants so to doe that is to saye neither to alien the whole nor any parcel therof without the kinges licence And that appereth by Bracton fo 88. Which speakes generally that the kings tenantes in chief cannot dismember his fees wtout his licence And because that before the time of king Edw. the firste they might haue aliened without licence to holde of themselfes as other mens tenauntes might haue done in the like case thinking it more lawful for them so to doe after the making of the said statut of Quia emptores thaÌ„ before it was thought good to prouide some stay for the same by this statut of Prerogatiue And yet by the woordes of the other chapter folowing it appereth that the kings tenant by grand serieantie could neuer haue aliened any lands holden by grand seriantie wtout the kings lyceÌ„ce For that was so high a seruice as Bracton in his first booke in the title de magnis seriaÌ„ciis names it Regale seruicium saith it was first inuented wtin this realme in the time of the Conquest that they coulde not dismember any parte therof without the kinges lycence For he saith in another place in the said booke amongest his writes of particion Quod seriantia diuidi non debet ne cogatur Rex accipere seruiciuÌ„ suuÌ„ per particulas Howbeit since the makinge of this statut of Prerogatiue sundry opinions haue risen in these matters as may appere by the statut made in the firste yere of king E. 3. ca. 12. Which saith in this maner Item pur ceo que plusours gents du Realme soy pleinont deste greues de ceo que terres et tenemÌ„ts que sont tenus en chiefe du roy et aliens sans son conge ount este pris auaunt ceux heures en mains le roy et tenus come forfets le roy ne les teigne my coÌ„e forfets en tiel case mes voet et graunt que desormes de tiels terres et tenementes aliens soit reasonable fyne pris en le chaÌ„cerie per due proces So that by this statute it appereth they toke the landes to be forfeted that were holden of the kinge in chiefe and aliened without his licence And so it appereth by a booke in .14 E. 3. wher Wilby saith that at this day landes holden by graund seriantie and aliened without lycence be forfeted 14. E. 3. in Fitz ti Quare imp p. 54. For the seruice of one mans body cannot be chaÌ„ged into another mans body without the kinges assent Also in the said first yere of king E. 3. the. 13. chap. It is prouided in this wise Et auxi come plusors gents du people soye plenont deste greues per purchase de terres et tenÌ„ts que ont este tenus des auncestors le roy que ore est come des honours et mesmÌ„s tiels tenements on t este prises en le maine le roy auxi si come ils eussent este tenus du roi en chief come de sa
the new Natura breuium fo 26â— and in .5 H. 5 H 5. H. 5. I finde a scire facias sued vpon this statute against him that had liuerie because an office hath found an other to be nerer heire to the auncestour that dyed than was hee that sued liuerie So alwaies as farre as I can finde it is sued vppon a recorde the disproues the liuerie or ouster le maine and not vpon any that affirmes it whereby I suppose that yeluertons opinion is lawe as is beefore declared And it semes that by this statute the king must sue a scire facias al though the recorde or title that is found for him bee founde within a yere after liueri or ouster le maine sued And lerne whether Assise lye against the eschetour that sesseth without a scire facias in cases where a scire facias should be sued For by the sta of W. 1. ca. 24. assise lieth against him in cases wher he seiseth anye landes by colour of his office wtout speciall warrant or commaundement or certeine authoritie that be longeth to his office so to doe And learne whether the king by that seisure hath any possession for if the king seise without a scire facias where he ought to sue a scire facias the partie hath no remedy but to sue vnto him by peticion euen as he should do if his highnes had seised any other lands of his without cause Howbeit the king by such a reseiser vndoeth not the parties possession so that he shal bee saide an entruder from the time of the liuerie or ouster le maine sued as it doth in case the reseiser had bene vpon a scire facias wherfore in such case although the partie cannot be suffred to recouer his possession againe by entrie vppon the king yet when the kinge graunts it ouer he may now enter or haue assise Trauers 26. as appeareth .24 E. 3 fo 34. et 43. li. Ass Also note that this statute that geeues the scire facias extendes but vntoo him or them haue liuerie or ouster le maine or anye other claiming by them For if after liuerie on ouster le maine sued a stranger by an eigne title in disaffirmyng the tenaÌ„ts interest enter as heire vpon him or recouer by assise of mor dauncester or any other accion auncestrell against him is entred into the land as heire nowe because the landes are holden of the king in chiefe his highnes may seise the saide land for primer seisine or title of Wardshippe as the case doth require without any scire facias 21. E. 3. fo 1. as appeareth .21 E. 3. For it is not to be said now a reseiser because against hym there was no seiser made of the saide landes before And lerne enquire if he that missueth the liuerie be within age whether the king shal reseise in that case as he shall doe if it were missued by one of ful age as take yâ— case to bee landes are holden of the kinge in Socage in Capite now the liuerie is sued within age that is to saye at the age of .14 yeres whether in this case the missuing of the same shall be a cause of reseiser or not T. 12. R. 2 see the booke thereof 12. R. 2. The wordes of the statute be further that if any record be found in the tresorie or elles where that vpon this record a scire facias shall be awarded But that is to bee vnderstande in this maner that first the transcript of the said record shal be by writ remoued into the Chauncerie and then out of the Chauncery shal there be a scire facias awarded not out of the tresory as it appeareth .21 â—â— li. ass lib. Ass Issues mesne NOte that if the king haue a title right or interest to any lands or tenements his highnes wheÌ„ he seiseth shal be aunswered of all the mesne issues and profites from the time of his sayd title right or interest growen and whether it be a right of entre or title of entre it maketh no diuersitie in the kinges case as for an example the king entreth for a condition broken his highnes shal be answered of all the issues and profites sins the condicion broken and yet in that case a common person shal not haue the issues and profites but from the time of his entrie Like law is it if the kinges tenaunt aâ—en in mortmain and the kinge entreth but otherwise it is if he entre for mortmain in lands not holden of him vpon a title deuolued vntoo his highnes in defaut of other lords And these cases appere H. 19. et 41. E. 3. fo 21. 19. E. 3. Entre coÌ„g P. 39. The same law is it where his highnes is entitled to seise for that the lands are of his foundatioÌ„ and aliened contrarie to the statut of west .2 ca. 41. which geues the writtof contra formaÌ„ collationis H. 46 E. 3. Forf P. 18. in this case his highnes shal be answered of all the mesne issues growen from the time of the alienatioÌ„ as appereth H. 46. E. 3. And note also that if the king make any graunt which is not sufficient in the law or is deceiued in the making of the same by reason it was made vpon a false suggestion in his case if this highnes doth resigne this graÌ„t adnull it iure regis as he may he shal be then be answered of all the mesne issues profits which were lost by reason of the sayde insufficient graunt as appereth .11 H 4. But if his highnes bee entitled to any lands nomine destriccionis there his highnes shall not bee answered of the profites but from the finding of that title 11. H. 4. f. â— as in case where the kinges tenant in chief alieneth without licence and an office is therof found in this case his highnes shal not be answered of the profites from the time of that alienation but onely from the tyme of the findinge of the office or from the tyme of a Scire facias returned wher the alienatioÌ„ is of record P. 8. e. 4. f. 4 and herof see the booke 8. E. 4. Like law is where his highnes is to seise the lands of his widow that hath maried her selfe without his licence 40. li. Ass Gard P. 36. And note that where the king is to be aÌ„swered of the mesne issues and profits perceued and taken of any landes which haue come to soÌ„dry hands sins the kings title first growen to the same there euery one of them that haue sondrely so perceiued and taken the profits shal answer for his owne time and not one for all as it appereth in the boke of 46. before remembred And note also that by the statut of w. 2. ca. 32. it is prouided that if any spiritual man bring any real action and recouer that the land recouered shall remayne in the kinges hands vntill such time as it be sued out of his hands by him that recouered or els by the chiefe lorde and in the meane time the shiriue shal auÌ„swer the kinge in the eschequer of the profites by which statut whether the collusion bee found or not found yet the king shal haue the meane issues as it is thought 20. H. 6. 20. H. 6. f. â— So it is in a writ iudicial of deceite brought against any the king shall haue the issues growen from the time of the first iugement vntill iugement be geueÌ„ in the sayd writ of disceit ¶ Some tymes the kynge recouâ—eth of the issue in the allowance of an estraunge tytle as yf the husband beynge the kynges tenant vpon a false suggestion purchaseth lycence to alieÌ„ to take estate to him to his wife so doth afterward dyeth the wife holdeth her in by title of Suruiuor occupieth nowe vpoÌ„ a Scire facias against the wife his highnes shal bee answered of all the meane issues since her occupiynge of the ii parts of the land and the thyrd part he recopeth and alloweth for her dower .40 li. Ass P. 36. ¶ Note that in a writ of disceit vpon a recouery in a Preeipe quod reddat of land where the proces was a graÌ„d Cape 40. Li. Ass Gard. P. 1. if the pleintyfe recouer he shall recouer the land and his damages but not the issues of the land synce the fyrst iudgement because the kinge shall haue them by the graunde Cape and the shirife accomptable of theÌ„ quod vide titulo disceit in Fitz P. 33. 46. 7. 32. Contrarie lawe is it if there lie no grand Cape in the action as if the recouerie be in a Scire facias as it appereth titulo Disceit in Fitz P. 36. 27. Finis Diuers other prerogatiues therbe which the kiÌ„g hath by the order of the comoÌ„ law that be not wtiÌ„ this statute coÌ„priÌ„sed a great part wherof vnder the title of Prerogatife master Fitz herbart hath most diligeÌ„tli noted in his great AbridgmeÌ„t so well ordred placed there that I doo of purpose omit to reherse them here The rest woulde require so longe a serche that oneles I had gathered and noted them al redie as I haue not doÌ„e in dede I should be faine to peruse the hole bodie of the comoÌ„ Lawes for the knowleg therof wheruntoo time seruethe mee not wherefore at this time myne intent is not to medle with them Imprynted at London in flete strete within temple Barre at the signe of the hand starre by Rychard Tottel An. 1567. Cum priuilegio
againste al men but it extendes to suche landes as are holden of these persones exempted by this statut Put case then that anie of these persones pourchace a seignorie since the tyme of the makynge of this statute shall the kynge haue hys prerogatiue in the landes holden of that seignorie or not And it is clere he shal notwithstandynge the aforesayde woordes of exception for theye doe not extende but to suche fees as we are theyrs at the time of the makynge of this statut Then further for asmuche as there bee diuers statutes concernynge wardeshyppe made aswell beefore as since the time of kynge Edwarde the seconde let vs see whether this prerogatiue wyl extende to those statutes or not and it seemethe it dothe for asmuche as this prerogatiue hathe beene euer from the beginninge as I haue sayde before And therefore if the kynges tenaunte beeinge seased of landes holden of a common parson makethe a feffement therof by collusion contrarie is the statute of Marlebridge to defraude the lord of the wardshippe and diethe the king hauing his heire in warde this matter founde by office shall sease vpon a Scire facias if the collusion be auerrable or wtout a Scire facias if the collusioÌ„ be apparaunt hold the same in warde by force of this prerogatiue that appeareth in 9. H. 4. So likewise wher the statute made in 4. H. 7. T. 9. H. 4. f. 5 prouidethe that the heire cesty que vse shall bee in warde Put case that the kynges tenaunte in capite before the statute in Anno. 27. H. 8. had made a ferfement of lands which he holdethe of a common perâ—one to the vse of hymselfe his heires and died before that statute in this case the kinge shoulde haue hadde his prerogatiue in the Landes so beynge put in feoffament to an vse euen as if his tenaunt had died seased thereof T. 12. H. 7. fo 17. as it appearethe 12. H 7. Than last of all let vs learne howe the lordes whose fees the kynge hathe in warde by his prerogatiue shal be demeaned and ordered for the rentes to be dewe for their seignories duringe the wardshippe whether they shall leese them as they do the landes 29. lib. ass in fits ti Petic p. 5. P. 24. E. 3 f. â—â— and the new natura breuium fo 179. And it appeareth in the booke of assises in 29. E. 3. that they had them by peticion at the Kynges hands therwith agreeth thoppinion of Hill ' in the .24 yere of kyng E. 3. Learne the reason of these bokes for it should seme to me the lawe to be otherwise because that al mesne seignories are suspended duringe the time the kyng hathe the tenauncye in warde if it bee not per case for the surplusage of a rent seruice whiche the mesne maye sue for to the kynge by waye of peticion and to saye that the heire shal be charged at his full age withe the sayde rentes it weare noe reason for then bothe his lande shoulde bee in warde and yet he charged to pay rent for the same wherefore it semeth that these bokes are against the law And with me agreeth Bracton in his first boke in the chapiter de custodia where he saieth Et cum tali ratione sint aliorum feoda in manu do mini regis pred' ratione alij capitales domini feod ' illorum ni hil poterint exigere de terris et tenÌ„tis illis nec in seruic ' nomi nat ' nec in auxiliis ad filiam maritandam vel filium primoge nit ' militem facieÌ„duÌ„ vel in sectis quaÌ„diu terre fuerunt in manu domini regis sed precipiet ' vic' qd ' hmÌ„odi distringere non permittat Howebeit Bracton in his said booke in the chapiter De releuijs saieth that the heire at his full age shall pay his reliefe to euerie of his lordes notwithstanding he hathe ben in warde quod nota for in al other cases he neuer paiethe reliefe that is to saye where he hathe bene in ward and hee makethe no other reason for it butte this s. quod hoc est speciale in rege propter suum priuilegium and so is the booke in the .24 M. 39. E. 3. in Fits ti Relief P. 1. Britton f. 163. yeare of kynge Edwarde the thyrde and the .39 yeare of the same kynge howebeit Brittons oppinion is that the heire shall paye noe reliefe to the other lordes after hee hathe beene in the kynges warde and commethe to his full age and I cannot fynde that the heire in anye suche case shoulde or doothe paye anye reliefe to the kynge that is to saye where hee hathe beene in warde therefore learn what experience teacheth vs in these cases The seconde chapiter ITem Rex habebit maritagium hered ' infra etateÌ„ in custodia sua existenÌ„ siue terre hered ' eorundem sint ab antiquo de corona siue de eschaetis quae sunt in manu domini Regis siue habuerit maritagium ratione custod ' terrarum dnÌ„orum eorundem hered ' nullo habito respectu ad prior ' feoffamenti licet de alijs tenuerunt Bracton li. 1. ti de herede sockman in cuius custodia esse debe at BrittoÌ„ f. 163 M. 24. E. 3. f. 24. H. 12. H. 4. in fits ti Gard. P. 81. All that is contayned in this Chapiter was the kynges prerogatiue by the order of the common lawe as it maye appeare in the bokes of Bracton and Britton in the places before noted and in a boke in the 24. yeare of kyng Edward the thyrde where it is sayde that no lorde can be more auncienter than the kynge for all was in hym and came from hym at the begynninge And therefore his highnesse muste haue prerogatiue in the bodye of whosoeuer the infaunte holdeth besides bee it that the landes are holden of the kynges highnes as of the auncientnes of his Corone or of hys newe escheates or come vnto hym as warde by reason of wardshippe or that his highnesse doe pourchace the seignorie of hym that is lorde by posterioritie or pourchaseth a manor holden of one of his honors whiche are of his newe eschetes of whiche maner thauncester of thinfaunt helde by posterioritie in all these cases the kynge shall bee preferred to the wardeshippe of the bodye and mariage beefore anye other lorde of whom the auncester also helde them daye of his death by priority of feffement that is to saye more auncient feoffement howe be it in these cases hys highenesse shall not haue wardeshippe in the landes holden of thother lordes beecause his tenaunte helde not of hym in châ—efe but onelye shall haue preferrement in the body and mariage beefore all other Then since the common lawe and statute dothe geue the kinge this prerogatiue let vs see whether his highnesse maye by grauntinge away his seignorie to an other graunt also with the same his prerogatiue to the grauntee that is to
the deathe of his auncester bee not of the age of 35. H. 6. f. 47. T. 45. E. 3. fo 1â— 14. yeares as appearethe 35 H. 6. 45. Edwarde the third and allso in the newe Natura breuium fol. 2â—6 fol. 2â—â— But in euerye of these cases theye to whom the bodye belongeth shall haue an Ouster le main of the landes vna cum exitibus that ys to saye the lordes of whom the land is so holdeÌ„ by knights seruice in th one case and the Prochein amy in the other case But wher the landes bee holden of the kynge in Socage in capite the heire of the age of 14. yeares at the deathe of his auncester there the kyng shal haue primier seisin and the heirÌ„ dryuen to sue lyuerie for there is no persone that can make anye title to the heire or his landes but onelye the kynge and therefore the king must haue his primier seisin the heire driueÌ„ to sue his liuerie by expresse woords of the foresaid statut of Marlebridge so it seemeth also in that case that his highnes shall haue primier seisin in landes holden of other so they be holden but in Socage for the reasoÌ„ aboue remembred Tamen quere The woordes of the statute bee farther de omnibus terris et tenementis de quibus ipsi seisiti fuerunt in dominico suo vt de feodo These wordes may bee conferred and coupled with the firste chapiter of this statute of prerogatiue whiche hath the verye selfe same wordes And therefore looke in what cases noted vppon the firste chapiter the king hath his prerogatiue by reason of wardship In al the same cases shall his highnes haue prerogatiue by reason of primer seisin if the heire weare of full age at the deathe of his auncester Wherfore to reherce theÌ„ here particularly it were but superfluous except it bee in the case onely of collusion geuen by the statute of Marlebridge where the heyre is within age beecause it speaketh nothinge of the heire that is of full age And therefore in that case it seemes the kyng cannot haue lyke benefyte of primier seisin as hee hathe of wardeshippe when the heire is wythein age Howebeeit there is a booke in that pointe lefte at large whiche is 17. E. 3. 7. E. 3. there the case was M. 17. E. 3. f. 63. M. 7. E. 3. in Fits ti Relief p. 11. The tenaunte enfeffed his sonne and heire dyeth before the feffee gaue notice thereof to the lorde Ideo quere The woords of the statut be farther Cuiuscunque etatis heredes ipsorum fuerint To these woordes also shall the firste chapiter of this estatute haue relacion for they plainly declare that if the heire were within age at the deathe of his auncester the kyng shal haue primer seisin and the heire driuen to sue his lyuerie notwithstandinge also the kynge haue had the wardshippe of hym For the wordes be generally spoken and maye be extended aswell where hee was within age at the deathe of his auncester as where hee was of full age And so hathe it beene euer vsed sauinge that where hee hath been in ward hee payethe but one halfe yeares profite for primer seisin and in the other case hee payethe the hole The woordes of the statute bee farther capiendo omnes exitus eorundem terrarum tenementorum donec facta fuerit inquisitio pro ut moris est et ceperit homagium hered ' By these woordes it maye appeare that the kynge after the deathe of hys tenaunte and beefore anye office founde mighte seise the landes and take the profites whiche thinge surelye is true as plainelye is proued by the writte of Diem clausit extremum whiche hath these woords Cape in manum nostram omnia terras tenementa c. donec aliud inde perceperimus per sacrum proborum hominum diligenter inquiras c. So the seiser goethe before the inquisition howebeit since the statut made at Lincolne Anno. 29. E. 1 called statutuÌ„ de Escaetoribus it is not vsed to seise tyll office bee founde and then the kyng to bee aunswered of all the profites since hys tenaunts decease whiche commethe all to one effecte And that statute dothe not restrayne the seiser but that thercheator maye seise at this daye withoute office By the aforesaid statute of Marlebridge cap. 16. it is expounded and playnelye set foorthe of what lands and fees the kynge shall haue primer seisin for these bee the woordes Et hoc intelligatur de terris feodis que ratione seruicij militaris socagij vel seriaÌ„ciae sine iure patronatus in manibus domini regis esse coÌ„sueuerunt By these woordes it maye appeare that he that is warde beecause of wardeshyppe shall sue lyuerye or where one holdethe of the kynges warde by knyghtes seruice or in Socage and dyethe hys heire of full age the king shall haue primer seisin of the landes that are so holden of hys warde and the sayde seconde heire dryuen to doe hys homage or fealtye as the case shall require to the kynge and allso to paye hys reliefe vnto hym and to sue lyuerye of the sayde landes as it appearethe hee dyd in the newe Natura breuium fol. 294. 295. For it is withein the compas of these woordes que ratione seruitij militaris So ys it yf the kynge haue a Byshoppes temporalties in his hands duryng the time that See is vacant and one that holdeth of that temporalties by knyghtes seruice or in Socage dyethe hys heire wythein age in this case after that the kynge hathe hadde the wardeshippe the heire at his full age shal paye primer seisin and sue hys liuerye And so shall he doe yf hee bee of full age at the tyme of the death of hys auncester for the woordes of the statute bee De feodis quae iure patronatus in manibus domini regis esse consueuer ' and therwithe agreethe the newe Natura breuium folio 286. Butte learne yf the kings tenant in chiefe dye hys heire of full age and one that holdethe of the heire beefore hee hathe sued his lyuerie dyethe his heire allso beeynge of full age whether in thys case the kynge shall haue primer seisin of the landes of the seconde heire or noe as hee shoulde haue hadde yf the heire of his tenaunte hadde beene wythein age and in the kynges warde at the time when this seconde heire dyd falle and it seemethe to mee hee shall for the reason made afore Thanne laste of all whether this prerogatiue extende to anye statute made since the tyme of kynge Ed. 2. and it seemes it dothe and that for the reason noted in the first chapiter as the feffees of Cestuy que vse before the statut made in the .27 yere of kyng H. 8. vsed to sue an Ouster le mayn sine exitibus whiche was in nature of a lyuere for the heire of cestuy que vse which had bene inward Item for
time the woman may aske her dower in the chauncerie and when she is endowed and loses her dower vpon a recouerie had against her by an eigne title how she shal be recompenced If the husband haue land in diuerse counties wherbie after his death there be awarde seueral writz of Diem clausit extremum in to euerie of those counties she shal not be ēdowed vntil such tyme as all the said writs be returnd again in to the chancerie as it maie apere in .16 E. 3. H. 16. E. 3. in Fitz ti Liuere P. 29 And note that when she is endowed in the chancerie and afterwardes loses by a recouerie vpon an eigne title then she hath none other remedie but to cause the record of the same recouerie to be remoued in to the chauncerie and vpō the first record wherby yt apered she had dower and this other record of the recouerie she shal haue a Scire facias recitīg both the recordes against the tenāt of the ii partes to resese the said ii partes in to the kinges handes and to be newlie endowed of the same but not to recouer anye damages not withstanding damages were recouered against her this apereth 43. in the boke of assises 43. lib. ass in Fitz ti Dovver P. 79. Now to the last braunce of this statute which is that wemen that hold of the kinge in cheefe any inheritāce of what age so euer thei be shal likewise swere not to marie c. By the order of the comon lawe before the making of this statute al women that were wtin age in ward should whē they came of ful age be maried by their lords euerie one of them with their porcions and if they were of full age at the deth of their ancestours yet should they neuertheles be in the lords keping vntill their were maried by the aduise dispositiō of their lordes For as Glāuille in his .7 boke that he wrote in the time of kinge H. 2. sayethe Nulla mulier heres terrae sine dn̄orum disposicione vel assensu maritare potest de iure vel consuetudine regni and therefore saieth he yf a man haue issue one or moe doughters which be his heires aparente marieth ani of them wtout the assent of his lord that be therbye forfets his in heritance by the lawe and custome of the relme so that he shall neuer recouer yt again but onlie through his lordes mercie and that for this cause For when the husband of such a woman shal do his homage for the tenemēts so holden by knightes seruice it is requisite to haue the lords will assēt lest he be compelled to receue homage of his mortall enemie or some other vnable personage neuertheles yf the tenant sue to his lorde for license to marie his daughter the lord is bound to consēt or els to showe cause whie he should not and if he will not the woman may marie wher she listes without his assent And the said Glanuill further saieth that Tenant in dower can not in likewise marie without the assent of him that is her warrant that is to saie the heier And if she doe she shal lose her dower and yet there the husbād shal doe no homage but what then he shall do fealtie and for that cause also she shal haue license And further saieth if she holde of diuerse lords it is sufficiēt for her to haue the assēt of the cheefe lorde Also he saieth that wemen being in ward Si de corporibus suis foris fecerint which wordes as I vnderstand them bee if thei comit fornicacion and that be proued then they that offend shal be disherited so that her porcion then goes to the other sisters that haue not in the like offended And if they all offend then the lord shall haue the inheritance by waye of eschete Howbeit saieth he wher they be ons maried by the lordes assent and after becōe widowes thei shal be no more in ward but yet if thei marie again they must haue his assēt for the reson before made But then after thei haue bene once maried thei shall not forfet their inheritance for their incōtinencie so that it aperes plainly here by Glanuill that this hole statute of prerog should be but a confirmacion of the comō law And that the law was so as Glanuill toke yt it may partly apere by the said statute of Magna carta cap. 7. For the wordes are not onlie quod vidua securitatem faciet quod se non maritabit sine assensu nostro si de nobis tenuerit Bracton libro 1 de custodia sockmanorum but are also vel sine assensu domini sui si de alio tenuerit And Bracton agrees also with Glanuille Howbeit he saieth where a woman in the life of her auncestors maries without the assēt of the lord or wher the widow maries without the asseēt of her warrant that the inheritance or the dower shall not now be forfeted although in olde time yet was And farther saieth that the heier in socage being a woman shal be maried by the lord like as she should be if she weare heier of lands holden by knights seruise And farther saieth that the heier male shal be maried by the lord more thē once that is to saie as oftē as he shall come vnmaried in the time that he is vnder the age of xxi yeres But now by the statut of w. 2. cap. 22. the lords are abreged of their power in these mariages of the heires females for yf thei now be within the age of xiiii yeres at the death of their auncestor and the lord doth not marie them before thei come to xvi yeres then shall thei recouer their heritage without ani thinge geuen either for the ward or for the mariage And if their maliciously or thorough euel counsell refuse to marie where their lords doe apoint them without disparagement then shall their lord hold their land vntill thei come to the age of xxi yeres longer vntill they haue takē the value of the mariage Out of this statute if it be wel cōsidered a man may gather that the comon lawe was no lesse then is here recited And this statute was made about the .3 yere of king E. the 1. a litl◠before that Britton began to writ his boke for Britton f. 169. saies that the mariages should be offred to the heires females before they accōplishe the age of xiiii yeares and yf not the lorde shall lose his right in the saide mariages I suppose that the printer mistoke the nomber of the yeres and should haue printed sixteene wher it is but forteene and therfore it is good too see other copiees for this matter And Britton also sayeth that if he or she haue beene once marryed by the lorde or in the lyefe of they re father or once agreed with their lord for their mariage they shall neuer again be maried by him but maye marie
them selues where thei list so that they hold nothing of the king And fo 168. he saieth that the king shall haue the mariage of all the heires females where thei hold of the king of what age so euer they be as ofteÌ„ as thei shal be to marie so that they can not marrie wtout the kinges licence Thus is the last clause of this chapter expressely proued by Britton that the comon law did stil remain as it was for the mariage of the heires females in the kinges case and not altered or abreged by the said estatute of west primer therfore was the statut in the 39. yere of king H. 6. the last chapter made in this wise Item de auisameÌ„to assensu et aucthoritate pred ordinatuÌ„ est stabilituÌ„ qd mulieres existentes etatis 14. annoruÌ„ tempore mortis antecessoruÌ„ suoruÌ„ absque questione seu difficultate habeant liberacioneÌ„ terraruÌ„ et tenÌ„torum suorum sibi descensorum quia sic lex istius terrae vult quod tunc ipsi haberent How beit this statute prouides not wher thei be within the age of .14 yeres at the deth of their auncester ideo quere For as our late bokes go sins Brittons time the king hath lost his prerogatife vpon what occasion I know not but I woulde gladlie lerne 35. H. 6. 46. for Fortescue saies 35. H. 6. that when the heir female sues her liuerie she takes no oth that she shall not marie as the kinges widow doeth and therfore saieth he it should seme she should make no fyne yf she marie without liceÌ„se Howbeit Littelton saies that if the heir female be of the age of 15. yeres at the deth of her aÌ„cestor and marie her self without license that she shall make a fine for it amouÌ„teth to an alienacioÌ„ For after issue had the husband is become the kinges tenaÌ„t and he solie shall doe homage in his owne name And yet afterwardes in the 15. yere of E. 4. the same Littelton saies that the latter clause of the same statute is void for the doughter which is inward mariynge her self to an other wtout licence shal not make a fine to the king Thus by the argumeÌ„t of the said boke of .35 H. 6. it aperes that thei take the king to be bound by the said statut of w 1. and make him no better then a comon person wherat I haue no litle meruel sins he is not named in the said statute For in the said boke it is agreed by the court that if the kâ—ng after the age of 14. yeares and before 16. do marie the heir female she shal haue liuerie foorthwith vpoÌ„ the mariage H. 35. H. 6. in Fitz ti Gard. P. 71. althoughe she then bee not of the age of xvi yeares because that she was of full age before as it is there said that is to saie as sone as she was 14. And that ii yeres ouer is but only geuen for the mariage which when it is once had and the .14 yeres past the kinge or lord lese theire interest And so it was granted that if she were maried before the age of .14 and after her husbaÌ„d dies before the said age when she comes to the said age of .14 she shal haue liuery And there it was also said that these ii yeres were geuen to the lord to tender her mariage in for the tender before was void because it was wtin the age of 14. yeres But note that if the heire female being vnder the age of 14. yeres falleth in to the kinges handes as ward because of certen lands that her father held of the king in cheefe by reson therof the king hath also the lands inward which are holden of other in socage in this case when she comes to the age of 14. yeres and is vnmaried she shall not haue liuery of these landes holden in socage and yet by reson of them the king hath not the mariage of her But what then she cannot sue her liuerie by parcels and that is the cause that the hole land shal tary in the kings hands til a hole liuerie mai be sued of them all and this aperes in the newe Natura breuium fo 256. And last of all note that this latter clause extends not to women that clayme by purchase but onlie by disceÌ„t And therfore it aperes .15 E. 3. 15. E. 3. iÌ„ Fitz ti Liuere P. 31. that where it was found vpoÌ„ the Diem clausit that the wife was iointly infeffed with her husbaÌ„d she had an ouster le main without findinge any suertie of her mariage And note also that by the comon law yf one will mary the kings nief 33. li. ass in Fitz ti Trauers P. 36. that is to saie his bondwomaÌ„ wtout license he shal paie a fine vnto the king as aperes in 33. E. 3. li. Assisarum The fifth chapiter ET si vna hereditas quae de Rege tenetur in capite desceÌ„dat pluribus participibus tunc omnes illi heredes facient homagium Regi et illa hereditas quae de Rege tenetur participabitur inter heredes illos ita quod quil'z eorum extunc partem suam tenebit de Rege This statute is somwhat declared by a statute longe time made before that is to saye in the 14. yere of king H. the .3 called statutum Hibernie de coheredibus which for the better declaracion of this prerogatiue I haue also here noted HeÌ„ricus dei gratia rex Anglie dominê° Hiberniae et dux Aquitaniae et NormannÌ„ comes Andigauie dilecto et fideli suo Gerardo filio Maurisci Iusticiar ' Hibernie saluteÌ„ Cum milites de partibus Hiberniae nuper ad nos accedentes nobis ostenderunt quod cum hereditas deuoluta sit inter sorores in terra nostra Hibernie Iustic ' nostri in eisdem partibus itinerant ' incerti sunt vtrum post natae sorores tenere debeant de primogenita sorore et ei facere homagiuÌ„ an non Et quia predicti milites petieruÌ„t certiorari qualiter iÌ„ regno nostro ' Anglie iÌ„ casu consimili hactenus vsitatum fuit sic ad instantiam eorundeÌ„ vobis significamus quod in regno nostro Anglie talis est lex et consuetudo in hoc casu quod si quis tenuerit de nobis in capite et habuerit filias heredes ipso patre defuncto aÌ„tecessores nostri habueruÌ„t et nos semper habuimus et cepimus homagium de omnibus huiusmodi filiabus et singule earum tenerent de nobis in capite in hoc casu Et si infra etatem fuerint nos habebimus custodiam earum et maritagium singularum Si autem de alio domino tenuerint et ipsae sorores infra etatem fuerint earum dominus habeat custodiam et maritagium singularum et primogenita tamen faciet homagium domino pro se et omnibus sororibus suis et alie sorores cum ad etatem peruenerint
facient seruicia dominis feodi per manus primogenitae Nec potest primogenita ea ratione vel occasione a postnatis sororibus homagium vel custodiam vel aliquam aliam subiectioneÌ„ exigere vel habere Quia cum omnes sorores sint quasi vnus heres de vna hereditate si primo genita posset habere homagium aliarum sororum vel custodiam petere tunc esset illa hereditas diuisa ita quod primogenita soror esset simul et semel de vna hereditate domina et heres Here 's auteÌ„ suae partis et domina sororum suarum quod quidem in isto casu fieri non possit cum ipsa primogenita nihil posset petere plus quam aliae sorores nisi capitale mesuagium ratione eineciae Preterea si primogenita huiusmodi homagium a post natis sororibus suis acciperet esset quasi domina earum et habere posset custodiam earum et filiorum suorum et hoc esset quasi committere agnuÌ„ lupo ad deuorandum Et ideo vobis mandamus quod predictas consuetudines quas in regno nostro Anglie habemus in hoc casu vt predictum est in terra nostra Hiberniae proclamari ac firmiter teneri facias et obseruari In cuius rei c. Teste me ipso apud vvest ix die Februarii Anno regni nostri xiiii GlaÌ„uil li. 7. Before the makinge of this statute called statutum Hibernie it appereth by Glanuill which wrott in the tyme of kinge Henry the second that the husband of the eldest daughter should do homage vnto the Lorde for the hole inheritaunce and that the other daughters or theyr husbandes should do their seruice for theyr tenemeÌ„ts vnto the chief lord by the handes of theldest sister or her husband and yet they for the same should not be bound to do anie homage or fealti to the eldest sister or her husbaÌ„d duringe theyr liues ne yet that heires that come of them in the first degre or secoÌ„d degre But the heires in the third degre by the lawe of the Land were bouÌ„d to do homage to paye reliefe for their tenements vnto the heire of the eldest daughter Quod nota And the reason of it after the minde of Bracton which agreeth with Glanuille is this that when issue descendeth of them to the 3. or .4 degre it is not like that issue should faile of their bodies Bract ' li. de homÌ„ capieÌ„d and then may the heires of theldest daughter take homage verie well for it is vnlikely that the eldest daughter or her heires shoulde then haue the same by discent for these be his wordes Quia cum sint heredes tres de herede in heredeÌ„ extunc vix poterin deficere et ideo tunc sequitur homagium absquedaÌ„pno et periculo donatoris For if therwere likelyhode of the discent in this case the takinge of homage should be rather hurtfull then beneficial For by the ancieÌ„t Lawes if one had infeffed an other to holde of him and had taken his homage he could neuer be his heire afterwards but the next vnder the feoffor his heires of the kinred shoulde rather haue it As put case before the statute of Quia emptores the eldest sonne had enfeoffed the middelmost to hold of him and had taken his homage the middlemost dieth without issue the yongest should haue had the land and not the eldest because of the homage that he toke howbeit if there were no yonger sonne ne any other heire then the feoffor might claime the Land againe by eschete and not otherwise for as longe as there were any the feoffor or his heires of whome the Lands were so holden might not haue it And that Bracton sheweth also in his first boke in the title de maritagiiÌ„s reuersis ad donatoreÌ„ ê“ defectu heredis For he hath this text or sainge there quod homagium expellit dominicum et retinebit seruicium quod non potest quis esse dominus et heres so that you may nowe perceiue that this statute of Irelande agreeth with Glanuill sauing that Glanuill dilateth or declares the common law farther then this statute doth Also Bracton saith further in his title of Homage that if the eldest daughter in this case wil preuent the tyme and take homage before she nedeth she by that leseth the benefite of the discent saieth that the reason why the serâ—yce ought to be done by the eldest for them all is because the lord shal not be driuen to take his seruice by parcell mele further saith that although the eldest may not haue homage of her sisters forthwith but must tarry a tyme yet shall they out of hand do fealtie vnto her all the other seruices that are to be done the eldest shal do them ouer whiche is contrarie to Glanuill for he saith the other sisters shall doe neyther homage nor fealtie Howbeit Britton fol. 175. agreeth with Bracton and there setteth forth the manner of the fealtie by the yonger sisters to be done to the elder saith that it is at the eleccion of the lord whether he will take homage the other seruices by the handes of the eldest onely for theÌ„ all or else of euery sister seuerally for her seruice for if hee might not so doe the lord in proces of tyme might happelye lese the wardship of the heires of the other sisters because of the woordes in the write of Ward which are that the ancestours dyed in his homage that would be harde to trye when the homage was euer done vnto him onely by the eldest sister And Bracton in his said title of Homage sayeth Cum quelibet soror de facto acapitauerit dnÌ„o capitali hoc reuocari non poterit a primogenÌ„ vel eius marito sed semê‘ qd ' factum est tenebit quia capitalis dnÌ„s quod ei oblat ' est non recusabit sed siue tenuerint de dnÌ„o Rege siue de alio cuÌ„ homagium factum fuerit siue ante tercium hered ' siue post statim sequentur releuiuÌ„ et alia seruicÌ„ a little before that sayeth si plures sorores de dnÌ„o rege tenuerint in capite tuÌ„c pri mogenit ' missa omnes acapitabunt et homagium facieÌ„t dnÌ„o Regi and therwith agreeth Britton fo 171. And yet fo 198. saieth that theldest only shall do homage vnto the kinge for her selfe her sisters Thus haue you now thexposition of the said statut of Ireland by the olde writers by which said statute the saide writers yt appeareth that this statut of Prerogatiue is but a confirmacion of the common lawe doth only set forth declare what the kings Prerogatiue is wheÌ„ landes holden in chiefe discend to twoe coparceners For in this the king hath a Prerogatiue aboue a comon person aswel for that they shal seuerallye holde of his highnes as for that that his highnes shall make the particion for
whether they be of full age at the death of their auncestour or within age or some of them of ful age some of them within age none of them that be of full age shal haue any liuerie but with a particion that for the kinges benefite because that vpoÌ„ the particion euery one of theÌ„ shal haue for his portioÌ„ some parte of the landes that are holden of the kinge in Capite For if some should haue for their porcion onlye the landes holden of â—ther then the king shoulde lose his prerogatiue in those landes hereafter for euer because that they that haue them when they shal dye hold nothing of the kinge in capite and so might the king be deminished of his auncient rights of the Crowne which were against all naturall equitie Wherefore the lawe was euer they should all holde of the king And that appeareth by the writs of Liuerie in which writes there is a prouiso that euery one of them shall haue in her purparte parcell of the landes that are holden of the king in Capite as you may see in the new Natura breuium fo 2â—â— And this liuery must be sued with a particion or else it is missued H. 16. E. 3. in Fitz. t. Liueri P. 29. it cannot be sued forth vntill such time as all the writes of Diem clausit extremuÌ„ are come into the ChauÌ„cerie returned as appeareth 16. E. 3. And then if all the coperceners be found of full age then a write shall goe out of the Chauncery to the Sherife to extende the landes after the extent retorned a write shal goe to therchetour to make particion and liuerie according to thextent therof made as appeareth in the newe Natura breuium fo 262. But if one of the coperceners be within age and in the kinges warde then the particion may be made in the Chauncery then to haue a write of Liuerie to thexchetour of her parte or else it may be wholly done in the Countrey by thexchetour like as they had bene bothe of full age that is to say shee of full age being there present in her owne person and she that is within age onlye by Prochein amye as it appeareth in the saide newe Natura breuium fo 26â— Whiche write shal bee retourned with the particion and afterwardes enrolled in the Chauncerie And it shoulde seeme that if after the write of extent retourned she that is of full age do praye a write of liuerie with a particion that she shall then neuer after haue a reextent if so be that before it were so highlye extended Like lawe is it if the particion be not egal and she notwithstanding will accept it But in all those cases she that was within age if she haue to litle for her porcion she may haue a write of participatione facienda against her other copercener or a Scire facias in the Chauncerie vppon the recorde of Particion that is there to shew why newe particion or extent shall not be made By which write if they bee warned and come not or come and saye nothing the land shal be receiued into the kinges hands and a newe extent made in the presence of the parties whiche if it be not extended as it shoulde be they may pray a reextent before particion made for after particion the prayer cometh to late And this may ye see in the newe Natura breuium fo 65. and in .2 E. 3. et 2. E. 3. in Fitz. ti LiuÌ„e P. 8. 13. E. 1. eodem ti p. 6. 13 E. 1. but learne whether she may defete the particion by entre wtout suyng any such writes or no because the other are in by matter of record the is to say by liuerie wherunto she is also after a maner party So is it not like the case of a straÌ„ger for a straunger that hath eigne title may enter vppon them after Liuerie notwithstandinge they haue the possession by matter of record á 7. E. 3. f. 36. And it is said by Hill 17. E. 3. that aduowson assigned in Purpartie may be defeated by puttinge debate vppon the presentment without any other Proces And note that sometymes the king is to take a detriment by the liuere with the particion As take the case to be where some of them be within age and in the kinges warde and some of full age and theyr auncestour dyeth seased not only of Landes holden in chiefe but also of Landes holden of other Lordes they of full age haue liuerie with a particion now the kinge leeses the wardwip of as much of the lands that are holden of other as they haue Liuerie of and yet if no particion had bene made the kinge shoulde haue had the Wardshippe of the whole til the heire had come of full age as Mombray affirmeth M. 21. E. 3. 32 21. E. 3. And note also that of thinges entier the kinge shall haue by nonage of one of them the whole and the other that bee of full age gett no parte of it ne yet liuerie therof ne particion as take the case to be this A maner holden of the king in chiefe wherunto aduouson is appendaunt discend vnto three coparceners and one of them is within age and in the Kinges warde the other two that be of full age maye sue theire liuerie for the lande with a particion but not for the aduowson For that shall whollye remaine to the kynge duringe the minoritie of her that is in warde 38. H. 6. f. 10. M. 21. E. 3 fo 34. And this appeareth 38. H. 6. et 21. E. â— And note that if vppon particion made thexchetour retourneth that some haue theire partes deliuered them and some not because they sued not to him for it they that did not sue maye at all tymes in the Chauncerie sue out a writte vntoo Thexchetour to haue the same deliuered vnto them in whiche write there shal bee enclosed a transcripte of the Particion as it appeareth in the saide newe Natura breuiuÌ„ fol. 2â—â— and there it appeereth also fol. 293. that liuerye with a particion was sued for landes holden in Burgage but by likelyhode it was no commen burgage for as it appeareth the heire did his homage for the saide landes And note also that if the Coparcener of full age take the parte of her sister whiche is in the kinges Warde by lease or graunt of the kinge Durante minore etate by this she suspendes the particion For notwithstanding she haue the one moitie deliuered her with the profites of the other moitie yet when her sister commeth to full age both they shal sue a newe lyuerie with a particion as appeareth in the saide newe Natura breuium fol. 2â—2 The sixth chapiter SImulier ante mortem antecessoris sui qui de rege tenet in capite ante annos nubiles maritat ' fuerit tunc rex habebit custodiam corporis illius mulieris vsque ad etatem
ne voilomus nous my de ceux qui deueignount sotes per ascun maladye Vpon these words of Britton I note .iij. things one is that the king shal not haue the custodie during theire liefes but duringe theire Ideocy the second notwithstanding the lande is in the kings handes yet the other lorde shall haue theire seignories which is by way of peticion as I take it and the thirde is that the other lorde shall not haue the wardshippe of the heire nor of his landes but onely the kynge whiche thiâ—de thingê by this statute of prerogatiue are not so plainelye set fourthe and also by this statute it appeares that the kynge shall haue the custodye of suche Ideottes durynge they re lyues for the woordes bee Et post mortem eorum reddat eam rectis heredibus and not beefore The manner howe the kynge shall come to his prerogatiue appeares by a booke case .16 Edwarde the thyrde 16. E. 3. in Fits ti Liuery P. 30. where Sharde sayes that when the kyng is enfourmed that there is suche an Ideotte hys highnes shall sende for hym and cause hym to bee broughte beefore hys chauncelloure or some other whom hee shall appoynte and yf by examinacion hee bee founde an Ideot yet his hyghenesse oughte not to sease his landes vntill suche tyme as hee bee founde an Ideot by office And in the newe Natura breuium folio 232. it appeares that the kinge appointes all this matter to theschetour or sherife bothe to examine and enquire in whiche sayde Natura breuium folio 229. it appears that this office when it is founde shal haue relacion a natiuitate to auoide al meane actes donne by the Ideot that is to saye his feffements or release but learne and enquire whether suche feffees shall bee put out by thoffice without anye Scire facias to bee awarded againste them M. 18. E 3. in Fits ti 30. Scire facias P. 10. et 106. In 18 .32 E. 3. a Scire facias was awarded in that case and learne allso whether the office shall haue relacion for the profites from the tyme of hys natiuitie or onelye from the findinge of thoffice Then to the exposicion the woordes bee Rex habebit custodiam terrarum fatuorum naturalium By these woordes it apperethe that he must bee a fole natural that is to saye a foole a natiuitate â–ª for yf he were once wyse and beecame a fole by chaÌ„ce or misfortun M. 18. E. 3. Fits ti Scire facias P. 10. the king shal not haue the custody of him and so it is agreed in .18 E. 3. And also in the newe Natura breuium fol. 2â—3 and the manner of the tryall of hym to bee a foole naturall appeares in the sayde Natura breuium folio 233. that is is to saye yf hee cannot tell to tweÌ„tye pence or tel his age or who was his father and mother or such like thinges whereby yt may appeare hee hathe no kynd of vnderstandinge in that that is eyther for hys profyte or dammage But if hee bee learned or apte to learne thenne is hee no Ideot as maister Fitsherbert there thinks M. 31. E. 3. ti sauer de defaulte P. 37. and Grene sayethe in .31 Edwarde the thirde That yf hee bee able to begette eyther sonne or doughter he is no foole naturall The woordes of the statute bee further Capiendo omnes exitus eorundem sine vasto et destruccione et inueniet eis necessaria sua By these woordes it appeareth that the kynge maye take the profetes to hys owne vse fyndynge them theire necessaries And therefore in the booke beefore of Tricesimo primo of Edwarde the thyrde the kynge dyd not lette the lande vnto one of the cosyns of the Ideot yeeldynge a rente butte these woordes findynge them necessaryes is not onelye mente to the Ideottes themselues but allso to all them that hange vpon them as they re wyfe chyldren and familye And allso by these woordes sine vasto destruccione M. 3. E. 2. in Fits ti Gard. P. 5. it appearethe the kynge is bounde to reparacions of theire landes and tenementes The woordes bee allso De cuiuscunque feodo terre ille fuerint By those woordes it shoulde seeme the kynge shoulde be preferred in thys tytle of Ideocye beefore anye other lords whyche myghte clayme the Ideot as hys warde howebeit learne what other menne thynke therein Et post mortem eorum reddat eam rectis heredibus Bye these woordes it shoulde appeare that the kynge shoulde saue the custodye durynge the lyfe of the Ideof and that than an Ouster le mayne in nature of a lyuerye shall bee suyd of the same oute of the kynges handes butte whether yt shall bee made wythe the yssues and profytes from the tyme of the Ideottes deathe or onelye butte from the time of the tender of the Oustere le mayne learne butte yf the landes that the kynge hadde so in custodye bee holden of hym in capite thenne notwythestandyng these wordes of the statute yet the kynge shall haue wardeshyppe prymer seisin and all other prerogatiues as yf hys tenaunte in chiefe hadde dyed seased thereof beynge noe Ideot as it maye appeere in the newe Natura breuium fol. 2â—6 And there it appeares folio 2â—2 allso that allthoughe the Ideot helde noe landes of the kyng yet a Diem clausit extremum shall bee awarded after hys deathe to enquire what landes hee dyed seased of of whom they are holden c. And it is to be noted that yf one be fouÌ„d Ideot by office before the king seaseth the lands the Ideot dies yet the kynge shall sease beecause of these woordes in the statute â— post mortem eorum reddat eam rectis heredibus whych his grace cannot do but vpon a seisure and thys appeares 18. M. 18. E. 3. in Fits ti Scire facias P. 10. Edwarde the thirde And note allso that if ther descende to an Ideot no possession in landes butte onelye a ryghte bee it righte of entre or title of entre or ryghte of accion the kynge shall not enter and haue the custodie of the same 1. H. 7. 15. as appeares in 1. Henrye the seuenth and yet if hys tenaunt of landes holden of hym by knyghtes seruice bee disseised and dyethe his heire within age the kynge shall enter and holde the same in warde and therfore learn what is the reason that shoulde make a difference in these cases The woordes be further Ita quod nullatenus per eosdem fatuos alienentur nec quod eorum heredes exheredentur Bye these woordes it appeareth the landes cannot bee aliened by the Ideot nor the heires disheryted and therefore if the Ideot make a feffement or release of his landes and that founde by office the kynge shall auoyde it as I haue beefore noted and so likewyse his heires after his deathe by force of these woordes of the statute And yet it appeares .31 E. 3. that a recouerie by
lande within this realm holden by NormaÌ„s which after they begaÌ„ to adhere to the FreÌ„ch king the kings enemy became traytors vnto his highnes they forfaited al their lands by order of the coÌ„moÌ„ law to the king of whoÌ„soeuer they were holdeÌ„ Howbeit in such cases after the forfaiture if the king had geueÌ„ these laÌ„ds to any other he might not haue geuen them to holde of him selfe but onelye of them of whom they weare before holden as this statute plainelye declareth that king Henry the third so did M. 20. â— 3. ti Assi in Fits P. 124. et ê‘ 46. E. 3. ti Peticion P. 19. And likewise in 20. .46 E. 3. it appeareth that if the king do otherwise his patent shall be repelled and made to holde of the lordes of whom the landes weare holden before the treason and that by a peticion of ryghte to be sued vnto the king for the redresse of the same for other remedie haue they none distrayne they may not as appeareth in the newe Natura breuium f. 180. And further it should appeare by the sayde boke of .20 E. 3. that the king ought not to reteyne such land in his owne handes no while but must dispose theÌ„ ouer to holde of them that were lordes thereof at the time of the treason committed Hereby may you gather that this statute in his first braunch is but a confirmacion of the common law and that long time before the makinge hereof kinge H. 3. had this prerogatiue as it dothe manifestlye appeare in the later braunche thereof And also by Bracton in his first boke in the title De custod ' maritagijs dnÌ„orum and likewise in Britton folio 28. The woordes of the statut be further Hoc similiter intelligendum est si aliqua hereditas discendat alicui nato in partibus transmarinis et cuius antecessores fuerunt ad fid eÌ„regis Franciae de tempore regis Iohannis Angliae sicut de baronia Monumete post mortem Iohannis de Monumeta cuius heredes fuerunt de Brittannia vel alibi By this braunch it shoulde appeare that at this time men of Normandy Gascoign Guion Angeo Brittain were inheritable wtin this realm as wel as English men because that they were somtime subiect vnto the king of England and vnder their dominion vntil king Ihons time as is aforesaide and yet after his time those meÌ„ sauynge suche whose landes weare taken awaye for treason weare still inheritable within this realme till the makynge of this statute And in the time of peace beetweene the twooe kinges of Englande and Fraunce theye weare aunswerable within this realme if they had broughte anye action for theire landes and tenementes as it doth plainly appere by Bracton in his fifth boke in the title De exceptione quia alienigenÌ„ for these be his words Est auteÌ„ alia exceptio qÌ„ competit tenenti ex persona petentis propter defectuÌ„ nationis qÌ„ dilatoria est et noÌ„ perimit actioneÌ„ Vt si quis alienigena qui fuer ' ad fideÌ„ regis FraÌ„cie actioneÌ„ instituit versê° aliqueÌ„ qui fuerit ad fidem regis Angliae talis noÌ„ respondeatur saltem donec terre sint communes nec etiam si rex ei coÌ„ces serit specialiter placitare quia sicut Anglicus non auditur in placitando aliquem de terris tenementis in Francia ita non debet alienigena Francigena qui fuerit ad fidem regis Franciae audiri placitando in Anglia Note here that he sayethe that this exception is but dilatorie and not peremptorie whiche proueth that hee shall haue his accion at an other time that is to say in the time of peace And also he sayeth after Donec terre sunt communes which is as much to say vntill suche time as there is peace beetwene Fraunce Inglande Also Bracton in his thirde booke vnder the title quod mulier ostendat warrantum per quem petit dotem sayethe si warrantus fuerit ad fidem regis Franciae excipiatur de warranto remanebit dotis exactio in suspenso imê‘petuum vel ad tempus saltem donec terre fuerint comunes This warrant of dower is the heire of the husbands for by thauÌ„cient law if a woman had brought her writ of dower against any other but the heire he was not bounde to aunswere her dower vntill such time as she had brought foorth her warraunt that is to say the heire In like case after shee is endowed she is not bounde to aunswere to anye other without the heire and if it might appeare that the heir had no righte in the second part then shoulde shee be barred of her accion of dower as it appeareth in the case beefore that hys right is suspended when he is a FrenchmaÌ„ and the .ij. realmes at warre Howebeit it appearethe as I haue sayde before that this exception is not peremptorie but that after the twoe realmes be agayne at peace she shall haue her dower The woordes of this braunche be also in the Copulatyue that is to say that the auncester must be of the allegeaunce of the Frenche king that the heire of the sayd auÌ„cester is born in the part of beyond sea I put case than that the auncestour were of the allegeaunce bothe of th one kynge and the other that is to say the Frenche king and the kyng of Englande whether is this within the compas of this statute For Bracton in his saide v. book vnder the title De exceptione quia alienigena saith Quod suÌ„t aliqui qui sunt ad fidem vtriusque sicut fuit W. comes Marescallus manens in Anglia et Michaell de Seins manens in Francia et alii plures et ita tamen quod si contingat guerra moueri inter Reges remaneat personaliter quilibet eorum cum eo cui fecerit ligeantiaÌ„ Whereby it shoulde appeare that of suche as were in allegeaunce to bothe kinges the kinge shoulde haue no eschetes of their landes For the woords of the statute bee not onlye ad fidem regis Franciae but also et non ad fidem regis Ang. ideo quere And whoe shal bee inheritable at this daie that bee borne in the parties beyonde the sea and who not See the statute thereof made in the .25 yeare of king Edwarde .3 de natis in partibus transmarinis The thirtenth chapiter QVando aliquis qui de rege tenet in Capite in fata decedat et heres eius ingrediatur tenÌ„tum qd ' antecessor suus tenuit de rege die quo obiit antequam fecerit homagium regi et seisinam suam ceperit per regem tunc nullum accrescit ei liberum tenemeÌ„tum Et si obierit seisitus per idem tempus vxor eius noÌ„ habebit dotem de tenemento illo sicut contingit de Matilda filia comitis Hereford vxoris Manusel marescalli qui post mortem wilhelmi Marescalli Anglie fratris sui cepit seisinam
goodes to the kinge without anye exception And hereuppon it is to be seene firste what is comprised in thys woorde catalla Catalla is a generall woorde whiche comprehendes as well Chatels mouable as not moueable For leases for terme of yeares are within this woord catalla as appeareth by Bracton in his seconde booke in the tytle of Forfaiture of Felons sayeng quod terminum annorum erit domini regis vt catalla Quia accipit terminum ad similitudinē catallorum And therewith agreeth the booke in 39 H. 6. 39. H. 6. 34 Also vnder this woorde catalla is taken the issues and profites of landes and tenementes of them that flye for felony vntill suche time as they bee attainted or acquited And like wise of the Landes and tenementes of clerkes conuicte vntill suche tyme as hee hath made hys purgacion I meane lands tenements as wel of their wines right as of their own right P. 4. E. 2. in Fitz. Forfaiture p. 16. 16. E. 3. Corone p. 356 296. et 344. so is the booke 4. E. 2. et 31. E. 3. Also vnder this word contra are takē the emblements that were growing vpō the ground at the time that the forfaifure of the goods first began to take place as appereth 3. E. 3. Also vnder this word Catalla is cōprised a right of acciō to goodes as wher goods be taken away wrongfully frō the felon or wher one is endetted to the felon by obligacion P. 6. H. 7. in Fitz ti Forfaiture p. 12. M. 19. H. 6. fo 47. et H. 30 H. 6. fo 5. P. 28. E. 3. 92 et t. Trauers 32. lib. Ass p. 33. or is accomptable to the felon for any receites or otherwise this appeareth 6. H. 7. et 19. H. 6. Also vnder this word Catalla is takē sometims goodes wherin the felon hath no propertie as if a man deliuer money out of a bagg or corne out of a sacke to one to kepe which is afterwardes attainted of felonye the money or corne in this case is forfaited Like law it is if a thief that steales goodes seuerally from sundry persons afterwarde is attainted for one of the said felonies by this one attainder the goodes that are stolen from the other bee also forfaited to the king Like lawe is it if one steale goods and before he be attainted therof he killeth him selfe or dyeth in prison or abiures the realme confessinge an other felonie then that for the which he fled to the churche in these cases he forfaiteth the gooddes that hee did steale So it is if the wife kill her husbande shee forfaites the goodes of her husbande 44. E. 3. f. 39. 26. li. ass p. 32 And these cases ye maye see in the title of Corone in Fitz. p. 317. 323. 334. 318. 162. 319. 380. 379. 423. And in the title of Auowrie p. 151. And in the title of Forfaiture p. 15. Then let vs see further what may be saide vppon this word Felonum If th offence that is committed be felony then is it properlye within the compas of this woorde Felonum he that committes th offence shal be saide Felo Notwithstanding that he therefore shal not suffer death as in a case where one killeth another se defendendo or by misaduenture this offence is felony and hee that committes it shal forfait his goodes notwithstanding that hee obtayne pardon of life Coron̄ 116. Felonie 599. Dower 183. For it was at the kings pleasure to graunt pardon or not And this appereth 15. E. 3. But so shal not he that killeth one that woulde robbe him in his house Or the officer that killeth one that will not be rested nor hee that killeth any thing not yet borne as a childe in his mothers bellye nor the parsone that is straught that killeth another in his madnesse For in all these cases it is not felonye The woordes bee further Damna torū fugitiuorum Sometimes the king shall haue his chatell although he be not condemned of the felony as if a man be arrested for felony and afterwardes breakes the arrest and the other ere hee can take him againe killes him in this case hee that is killed shall forfaite his goodes and yet hee was neuer attainted of th offence Corō p. 312. et p. 290. Like lawe is it if bee were killed in the first arrest where he woulde not bee arrested And this appeareth 3. E. 3. Howbeit since that tyme there was a statute made anno 34. E. 3. cap. 12. Whiche seemes to alter the lawe in these cases if it bee not that you will say peraduenture that he shall forfait them quia fugam fecit Ideo quere Hee that is felo de se shall forfaite his gooddes and yet hee was neuer attainted Like lawe is before H 34 E. 3. in Fitz. Eschet p. 10. of the clerk conuict And so is it of suche as stande mute or challenge aboue the nomber of 2 enquestes as appeareth 34. Ed. 3. Then further this woorde fugitiuorum is taken suche as flee or withdraw themselues for the felonye that they bee endyted appealed or accused of for that makes a great presumpcion against them as Bracton saieth in his seconde booke vnder the title Ad quae restituaturvtlagatus and for that presumption sake shall the vtlawrie proceade whether hee bee giltye of the felonye or not And also saieth hee in the saide booke quód vtlagati de felonia gerunt caput lupinum secum suum portant iudicium ita quod sine iudiciali inquisitione pereunt quia merito sine lege pereūt qui secundum legem viuere recusauerunt et hoc ita si in capiendo fugiant vel se defendant Si autem viui capti fuerint vel se reddiderint vita illorum et mors est in manu domini Regis et qui taliter captum interfecerit respondebit pro eo sicut pro alio nisi sit in locis vbi consuetudo se habeat in contrarium videlicet in com̄ Hereford et Glouc̄ And in an other place hee saieth Quod nullum crimen maius inobedientia quia pro contemptu et inobedientia porerit quis excommunicari sicut pro quolibet peccato mortale cum omnes subditi debeant esse Regi tanquam precellenti maxime in honestis et ducibus eius tanquam ab eo missis et sic concordat lex diuina aliquantulum cum humana And also saieth quod vtlagatus de felonia foriffacit patriam et amicos forisfacit quae pacis sunt forisfacit quae legis sunt forisfacit quae iuris sunt et possessionis et forisfacit actionem ante vtlagariam sibi datam Thus by the waye haue I noted vntoo you suche thinges out of Bracton as mee seemeth bee notable and make somewhat for this purpose Althoughe I needed not to haue gone so farre as to outlawrie for exposition of this woorde fugitiuorum but might haue rested at the flyenge For if one flee for the
them before hee bee attainted the sale is goode Forfeture 30. 30. H. 6. f. 5 38 E. 3. fo 37. Corone 290. et 285. but for landes it hathe relacion to that daie of the felonic committed be it that the attainder bee by verdite or vtlarie as it appereth .38 E. 3. et 30. H. 6. or be it that he bee attainted without proces of law as in the cases aboue remeÌ„bred where he is killed in the fleing as appereth 3. E. 3. And note that if thattainder and the office found of his landes be both wtin the yere of the felonie first coÌ„mitted that it shal haue no relacion for that yeres profites otherwise it is if it be after the yere as it appereth 3. E. 3. This boke must be vnderstaÌ„de as I take it where the attainder the office be before any daye of paymeÌ„t within that yere The words of this chapiter be further Et si ipsi habeant liberuÌ„ tenÌ„tuÌ„ tunc illud statiÌ„ capietur in manum domini regis et rex habebit omnes exitus eiusdem per vnum annuÌ„ et vnum diem et tenementuÌ„ illud vastabitur et destruetur de domibus boscis et gardinis et aliis quibuscunque ad predictum tenementum spectaÌ„tibus It should appere by Glanuile in the beginning of this chapiter that the common law was as much before the making herof in all cases of feloni sauiÌ„g for theft in which in the king had no yere and daye Howbeit after Glanuiles time the statut of Magna carta was made which sayd in the 22 chapter therof Nos non tenebimê° terras illorum qui conuicti fuerint de felonia nisi per vnum annum et vnum diem et tunc red dantur terre ille dominis feodorum By this it should seme this statute doth remitte the wast because it speaketh nothing of it or ells perauenture you will saye that this word Nisi argues and proues that the kinge before the statut of Magna carta might haue holdeÌ„ it as longe as he would but to the coÌ„trarie of that exposition is Glanuile as it appereth before And also Bracton which wrote somwhat after this tyme For by Bracton in his second boke it appereth that before the making of the sayd statut of Magna carta the king had nothinge els but the wast and to th entent he should remitte the wast the yere and day was afterward geuen to the kinge For these be his words in the title of Vtlarie Si vero terraÌ„ liberam habuerint vtlagati statim capienda est in manum do mini regis et tenenda per vnum annum et vnum diem ad capitales dominos post terminuÌ„ illuÌ„ reuersura si de alio tenuerit quaÌ„ de rege si auteÌ„ de rege tunc erit Eschaeta ipsius regis et hoc veruÌ„ est quod per taleÌ„ terminuÌ„ remanebit in manu do mini regis nisi ipse capitalis dominus vel alius fineÌ„ fecerit protermino regi habendo fed quesit causa quare terra remane bit in manu domini regis videtur quod talis est quia reuera cuÌ„ quis fuerit coÌ„uictus de aliqua felonia in potestate domini regis erit prosternandi edificia extirpandi gardina et arandi prata et quoniaÌ„ huiusmodi vrge bantur in graue daÌ„num dominoruÌ„ pro coÌ„muni vtilitate prouisuÌ„ fuit quod huiusmodi dura et grauia remanerent et quod dominê° rex propter hoc haberet coÌ„moditateÌ„ totius terre illius per vnuÌ„ annuÌ„ et vnuÌ„ dieÌ„ et sic omnia cuÌ„ integritate reuertereÌ„tur in manus capitaliuÌ„ dominoruÌ„ nunc auteÌ„ petitur vtruÌ„ .6 finis pro termino et similiter pro vasto Et noÌ„ video rationeÌ„ quare nisi quod terminus bene poterit esse per se sine vasto eo quod fugitiuus et vtlagatus non soluÌ„ delinquit erga euÌ„ qui sequitur et appel lat sed erga regeÌ„ cuius paceÌ„ infriÌ„git contra fideÌ„ suaÌ„ cui tene tur quia quilibet cuÌ„ faciat sacrameÌ„tuÌ„ iurat salua fide domini regis Thus our autors agre not vpoÌ„ this yere day for Bracton is contrarie to Glanuille that wrote before him Howbeit BrittoÌ„ which was likewise before the makiÌ„g of this statut of Prerogatiua agreeth with Bracton as it appereth in his boke fo 14. adding further that the kinge shal not haue the yere and day of land that is holden only for terme of life or yeres or by freshe disseisin or in fee ferme or in mortgag And so is Bracton also therw t agreing in his secoÌ„d boke but now sins the time this statut of prerogatiua was made which geues the kinge as you may perceiue bothe the yeare day the wast And first he saieth quod rex habebit omnes exitus eiusdeÌ„ per vnuÌ„ annuÌ„ et vnuÌ„ dieÌ„ By this it should appere that the kynge should not haue the issues of the land but by a yere a day but yet it is clere that he shal haue the issues also from the time of the felonie done vntil the time his highnes hath had the yere day wast not the lord allowing that that is to be alowed for the finding of the prisoner for it can not be inteÌ„ded that the lord shoulde haue the meane profits because the laÌ„d shal be deliuered vnto him wtout profit that is to saye wasted destroyed 3. E. 3. in Fitz ti Corone 290. 49. E. 3. fo 1â— And therw t agreeth the boke in 3. 49. E. 3. And there it appereth that if an office be fouÌ„d 20. yeres after the attainder the kinge shal haue the profites from the time of the felonie coÌ„mitted vntill the yeare and daye next after the office founde For though the lord be entitled to haue theschete yet the kinges title for the yeare daye and waste goeth beefore the lordes For the wordes bee Postquam dominus rex habuerit annum diem et vastum tunc reddatur tenÌ„tum illud capitali domino Also by this woorde Reddatur it semes the lord can not enter intoo his escâ—ete after office found but is driuen too sue an ousterle main for the same out of the kinges handes as it appereth 8. 8. E. 2. in Fitz ti Trauers Pl. 48. E. 2. but if a stranger abate before office the lord shal haue a writ of eschete against him and recouer and yet that notwithstanding when an office shal be founde afterwarde the kinge may seise for the yere daye and wast and shal be aunswered of the mesne profytes like as it is when the kinges tenant in chief dyeth his heir of full age an estraÌ„ger abateth the heier maye haue assise of mort dauncestore if he will and recouer against the abator and yet vpon an office found afterward the kinge shall seise for primer season and be answered of all the meane profites and the heir
possession as any other By a statute made the .33 yere of the late kinge of famous memorie H. 8. the 20. chapter it is among other things prouided that if any person or persons shal be attainted of hye treson by the course of the comon lawes or statutes of this realme that in euery such case euery suche attainder by the cōmon law shal be of as good strength value force and effect as if it had ben done by authorite of parliament that the kinges maiestye his heires and successors shall haue as much benefit auātage by such attainder as well of vses rights entres cōdicions as possessions reuercions remainders and all other things as if it had ben done and declared by autoritie of parliamēt and shal be demed and a iudged in actuall and reall possessiō of the lands tenemēts hereditamēts vses goods cattals all other things of the offēdors so attaīted which his highnes ought lawfulli to haue and which they so being attainted ought or might lawfulli lose and forfait if the attainder had ben done by authorite of parliamēt without any office or inquisicion to be founde of the same any law statut or vse of the realme to the cōtrarye therof mani wise notwtstādīg This statut maks it clere without questiō that in cases of hye treson the lāds of him that is attainted are in the kinge biand by without any office But for other attainder it remaines as it was at the comō Law and therfore lerne if one which holdeth of the king be attainted of petit treson or felonie whether in this case by thatainder his lands be in the king without office and me semeth by attaīder and death together they should be in the kinge in law howbeit not in dede vntill suche time his highnes seise themby his officer or that an office bee therof foūd for by thattainder the lands are forfaited to the kinge by mater of record and then when the partie dyeth either the frehold must be in suspence or els aiudged in the king in lawe for he that was seised hath corrupted his blood and is dead without heir and therfore his highnes is beecome owner thereof in lawe and a possession in lawe vested in him of the same landes which his highnes at his will and pleasure may make a possessiō in dede as sōe as he wil take vpon him knowledge of the sayd landes and sease them by his officer And therfore the booke is agred 20. E. 4. 20. E. 4. so 10 that if he that is attaynted be seised of auowsōs appendaūt as sōe as the church becometh voide the king may presēt wtout any office which proues that the kinge by thattainder was patron before any office found or els how could his highnes present and I see no differēce betwene lāds auousōs in this case for auouson is not so transitorie toward the kinge but that he mai take the presentment therof at all times whē he will quia nullum tēpus ei occurrit Howbeit lerne what the law will in this case for many mē are of the contrarie opinion And see the boke .4 E. 4. cōcernīg this mater And so note what is sayd of a possession in law 4. E. 4. 21. for as I take it there may be a possession in law in the kinge as well as a possessiō in dede which possession in law is euer without office or any other mater of record as whē the possessiō is cast vpō his highnes by a discēt reuerter remaīder or escheit or in title of his seignorie or prerogatiue as for wardship primer seisī or for the custodie of the tēporalties of a bishop during the time that the see is vacant in all these cases without any office or other mater of record here is a possession in law vested in the kings highnes that is to say for that that doth descēd reuert remain or eschet the freholde is cast vpon him in lawe as it should be vpon a comon person in the like case or els the frehold should be in suspence which may not be of the rest the possession in law of a cattell is in his highnes in right of his seignorie which his highnes at his will and pleasure may make a possession in dede by entre or seasure but not to make it a possession in dede by his graunt because there is a statute made in the 18. yeare of H. 6. ca. 6. to the let therof which prouideth that all letters patents made of lāds tenements before office foūd and returned or within one month after but onely too him that tendethe his trauerse shal bee voyde This statute extdes onely to landes and tenementes therfore of the bodie of his warde his highnes may make a graunt notwithstandinge this statute as me semeth for that is neither lād ne tenemēt also notwithstādinge that this statute doth restraine the graunting of the lāds tenemēts yet the seisin therof remaines and is in the kinge as it was by order of the comon lawe which is as I sayd before in his highnes in lawe although not in dede vntil such time as he hath made a seasyn or an entree by his eschetour or a graunt therof which wayethe both to a seasure and a graunt in such cases where the graunte maye bee goode and not restrained by statute or vntill such time an office therof be found For an office that entitleth the kinge to the possession is sufficient by it selfe without any seiser or entre of the eschetour to make a possession in deede in the kinge if it be so that the possession were vacant when the office was founde But if the possession were not vacāt but an other thā he in whose right the kinge seiseth was tenant therof at the time of the findinge of the office then must the kinge entre or sese by his officer before the possession in deede shal bee iudged in him yea and if his highnes seise not by the space of a yeare and a daye after the findinge of the office then maye be not seise without a Scire facias to bee pursued agaīst him that is tenāt therof 9. H. 7. f. 2. 7 49. E. 3. f. 22. 20. E. 4. f. 10. Estopel 255. Trauers 50. 32. Ass P. 32. 29. Ass P. 30. 21. H. 7 f. 7. P. 21. E. 4 f. 1 Gard. P. 105 And of those maters you may see bokes 9 H. 7. 49. E. 3. 20. et 21. E. 4. 4. E. 2. 10. H. 4. 21. H. 7. 29. et 32. li. ass But heruppon is there a distinction to be made whether that that the king is ētitled vnto by office be a thinge manuell and wherof profit maye bee taken forthwith after the findinge of the office or not For if it bee such a thinge as is not manuel and wherof there is no profite too bee taken forthwith vntill such time it falleth in that case althoughe the king be in possession of the right of
the thing yet is he not in possession of the profit therof vntill such time as his highnes actually by his officer when it falleth taketh and perceiueth the said profit as for example The thing that king is entitled vnto by office is no land but auowson rent or a comon although that the kinge by this office be patron of thauouson or owner of the rent or comon and therby when the benefice becometh voide may present or when the rēt daye cometh may receue the rent or when the comō is to be takē may vse the said comō yet if the office that entitleth his highnes be false and he that was in possession at time of the office take the profite when it falleth before the kinges officer do take it in this case this takinge is no entrusyon vpon the kynges possessions for he was neuer seysed in deede wherefore being driuen to his accion if his highnes bringe his Quare impedit or accion of trespas the defendant maye trauerse the office with him in the said actions keping still his possession and neede not too sue in the chancerie for the trauersing of the same This maye you see a Difference beetwene a thinge that is manuel and a thinge not manuel and what the reason therof should bee learne for as I. suppose the reason of it is no other but as I sayde before that when a straunger is tenant at time of the office findynge the office maketh no possession in deede in the kinge beefore an entrie or a seiser And then when the kinges officer taketh not the profites when it falleth but suffreth him that was in possession to take it then was the kinge neuer seised but he still remaines in possession that was possessed at the time of the finding of the office vntill such time as seiser bee made for the kinge which can not bee done at all times as it maye bee of land but onely at such times as the profit therof is too bee takē that is to saye when it fallethe and that is nowe past for this time seynge it is allredy taken and therfore the kynge in that case is driuen too his action But quere whether his highnes may bee brought in possession in those cases by a clayme or not And these cases maye you seee in the bokes of .17 E. 3. f 10. 21. E. 4. f. 1. 5. E. 4. f. 3. et 4. E. 3. 15. H. 7. f. 24. Quare Impedit P. 33 Like law is it where an office is found which doth not entitle the kinge to the possession by entrie but onely by action as where it is found that the kinges tenant for terme of life or yeres hath done wast or being his tenant in fee simple hath cessed by ii yeres or made a feffemēt by collusiō contrarie to the statut of marlebrige or such like For it is a general rule that in al cases wher a comō person cannot ēter but is driuen to his action there the kinge can not haue the possession but by like action or ells by a Scire facias after office foūd in nature of the actiō for the office in the case entitleth the kinge to no other thinge but onlye to the action as appereth 21. H. 7. f. 1◠21. H. 7. fo 1◠But quere of a feffmēt that is foūd to be made by collusiō cōtrarie to the statute A. 34. et 35. H. 8. ca. 5. for in the case it semes his highnes may enter wtout Scire facias beecause the said statute apointes no action to be sued in the case And note that in al these cases before where the kinge is driuen to his Scire facias or other acciō if the office be false the partie maye trauerse the office with the king keping still his possessiō whether it be in the chancerie or in any other court nede not to sue any ouster le main if it be foūd for him because he was neuer out of possessiō Thē further let vs see in what cases the king can not be ētitled but only by office or other mater of record in what cases he may howbeit not to haue anye possessiō either in dede or in law vntil the time there be a seasure made And as to that note that in all cases where a comō persō can not haue a possessiō neither in dede nor in law wtout an entre there the kinge can not haue it wtout an office or such like mater of record as where the king hath title to enter for a mortmain or for a cōditiō brokē in this case the king can haue no title vntill such time as the sayd mortmain or cōdiciō broken be foūd by office or by some other record as it appereth 2. ◠9 H. 7. 2. H. 7. in Fitz ti proc P. 10. So it is in diuerse other cases concerning the kinges prerogatiue as in the case of Ideotes of lunatikes which haue lāds or tenemēts or when his highnes is to be ētitled for annū diē et vastū of persōs attaīted or for an alienaciō wtout licēce or to sese the tēporalties of a bishop for a contēpt in all those cases his title must be furst foūd by office or otherwise apere of record for these rights his highnes hath only as king But if his highnes haue cause to seise the lāds of his widow that hath maried her self wtout license his highnes maye seise notwtstandinge there be no office foūde of her mariage as it appereth in the new Natura breuiū f. 174 Learne what should be the reason therof more then in the case of alienaciō before Like law hath bene vsed where his highnes is to sese lands of priors aliens within this realme ratione guerre his highnes doth it without any office for in bothe these cases the kinges title is notorious enoughe althoughe it appere not of recorde But yet in those cases his highnes must seise eare he can haue anye interest in the lāds because they bee penal toward the partie and of these cases you shall finde bokes 49. E. 3. f. 17. 21. E. 3. fo 31. 21. H. 7 fo 7. 14. H. 4. fo 37. 22. E. 4. fo 4. 3. et 17. E. 3. fo 1. et 17. Other prerogatiues the kinge hath which extende onely to personal and transitorie thinges ad bona et catalla felonū wreke de mere tresour troue or the profites of landes of clerkes conuict of felonie or of persons outlawed in a personall action to these thinges it semes the kinge is ētitled although there be no office or other mater of record found of them as it should appere 11. H. 4. fo 39. 21. H. 7. fo 7. et 27. li. ass P. 50 And note that if the kinges title appere any way of record Gard. 1. 40. Ass P. 36 it is as good as if it weare found by office Therfore yf the kinges tenāt alien wtout licence which alienacion appereth by fine or other mater of recorde
that hath but a chatell shall not be receiued in anye case to falsifie the record that geueth any man interest in the freehold although he be a straunger to that record Contrarie lawe is it of him that hathe a freeholde or inheritaunce in the lande for they shall trauerse the recorde in suche case Lyke lawe is it where the kynge is entitled but to the wardeshyppe of the heire of his tenaūt hee that is fermer of the dimise of a straūger shal not trauerse hys office althoughe the king be not entitled thereby to anye freeholde for it was not the minde of the makers of these statutes to helpe them that clayme but chatels which are accompted in law as nothing because they perishe and abide not Et de minimis non curat lex Howbeit learne what the law wil in these cases for I haue seene noe bookes of them The lorde in title of wardshyppe shal trauerse the office and yet hee claymethe but a terme of yeares in the lande as where it is founde by office that such a one helde lands of the king in chief and dyed his heire within age where in deede he holdeth no suche lande of the kynge but onelye of mee by knightes seruice in this case I that am lorde shall trauerse this office that is to saye shewe howe they bee holden of mee by knightes seruyce without that they be holden of the king as appereth in 1. H 7. Trauers 20. For ther it toucheth the lords inheritance in the righte of his seignory because he by the false office is to lose the profit that is presently fallen by reason of his seignorie it is reason he be receaued to trauerse the office But if hee were but lorde in socage he shoulde not be receiued to his trauerse because he therby can make no title to the wardshippe of the body 37. lib. ass P 35. and landes of the childe for it is a good generall grounde if the kynge be once seised his highnes shall reteine against all other that haue noe title notwithstandinge it be found allso that the kynge had no title but that the other had possession before him as appeareth in .37 lib ass where it was found that neither the kinge nor the partie had title and yet adiudged that the kynge shoulde reteine for thoffice that fyndes the kyng to haue a right or title to entre makes euer the king a good title allthough it bee false and his highnes therby maye take possession against any other that is seised of the landes and reteyne vntill such time as thoffice be trauersed by him that hath title and tried to bee a false offyce And therfore no man shal trauerse thoffice vnlesse he make him selfe a title And if hee can not proue his title to be true allthoughe he be able to proue his trauerse to bee true yet this trauerse wil not serue him As for an exāple it is foūd the kyngs tenaunt died seised of certayn lands that he held of the kynge in chiefe his heire beeinge within age where in dede he had made a feffement in his life time to an other of those landes it is no trauerse for the feffee to say he dyed not seised but he must first make him selfe a title by the feffement and for asmuch as it is founde that the landes are holden in chiefe if he wyl make his title good againste the kyng he must shewe fourth a lycence of alienation or a dispensation therof or els hee muste trauerse the tenure in chiefe as well as he shall doe the rest of thoffice otherwise his tytle is not good Trauers P. 44. et 46. Liuerie p. 18 as it appearethe in .36 E. 3. 3. H. 4. 6. H. 5. .3 H 7. f. 14. Howbeit Hussey holdeth opiniō that not mā may trauerse the tenure but the lord or the heire vnlesse his title be found by office but whether the lawe be so or not learn for as I take it the lorde and euery straunger that hath a tytle againste the kynge makinge his title shall trauerse the office before his title be found by office for when the trauerse is found for the partie his title nowe appeareth of recorde and by the trauerse found the office which was the kings title is vtterly destroyed gone so that now the king is not to make any liuerie of the lands to any person but onely to a moue his hands from the same with the meane issues and profites as one that had no cause to seise them And therefore euery man may enter now that will if he haue right or title of entrie to the lands for the king deliuereth them to no person certaine but onely ryddes his own hands of them as he that had neuer seised thē but otherwise it is where the king is to make liuerie for there his highnes must bee enformed certainly by mater of recorde who shal be his tenāt whoe it is that ought to receiue the liuerie at his handes least his highnes be deceiued in thadmitting of his tenant which ys ought to be a great mater towarde the lord therfore the cases be not lyke wherfore I think a man may trauerse by force of these statutes without hauing their title first found by office so be our bokes .36 E 3. 2. E. 4. f. 10. 16. E. 4. f. 4. Trauers 44. 43. li. ass P. 20. Howbeit 5. E. 4. fo 5. semes to weye to the cōtrarie hereof 12. H. 6. also where it is sayde that if it bee found that the kings tenāt died seised wher in dede he was iointly enfeffed with me now can I not trauerse this office except an other office were founde for me But contrarie lawe should it be if it had ben foūd by the office iointenant with hym for term of life wher in dede I was iointenaunt with him in fee simple in this case I may traūse thoffice because mētiō is made of me in the sayd office this boke case admitted to be law yet it varieth frō the case before remēbred of the strāger that trauersed thoffice for here thoffice is true and when it is found by office that he died seised this maye be allthough the sayde dying seised were iointlye with an other for any thynge that is expresselye founde to the certaintie and then the king here is to admit an other tenant as in the case of the liuerie before of whome as yet he hath no credible informacion that is to saye by mater of recorde and then it is lyke to the cases of tenant by the curtesie tenant in dower and the deuisee which in no wise can be admitted to their estats vnlesse mention be made of them in the office or some other office or mater of recorde found for them 9. H. 7. fo 24 Brief 618. as appearethe in 46. E. 3. M. 11. H. 8. and for none other reasō as I gather it but onely for that thoffice is
his daie notwithstandinge the statute of .18 Henry .6 cap .6 whiche ordeines that all letters patentes made before the kings title found by inquisicion retourned into the Chauncerie or other matter of recorde shal bee voide For that statute also extendes but to landes or tenementes no more than the other statutes do so that the graunteâ— of the bodye or of anye other thinge whiche is no lande or tenement is good at this day before any office or inquisition thereof found And it is further to bee noted that this statute of an .18 Henry 6. makes not suche letters patentes good for anye time whiche hee graunted contrarie to the tenure of that statute but they be voide fourthwith And learne and enquire if at this daye within one moneth or .3 monethes after office founde and retourned the master of the kinges wardes and liueries with aduise of one of the counsell of the kinges courte of Wards and liueries made a lease of the wardes landes or of an idiotes landes being in the kinges handes for the time of the kinges interest in the same and after within the tyme appointed by the statute comes a stranger and trauerseth the office whether in this case he shall haue the landes to ferme or not And it seemes that no because this statut that geeues that power to the maister of the kinges Wardes was made long time since the statutes of an .8 or .18 H. 6. that is to say in the .31 yeare of king H .8 whiche statute is generall and no sauing or exception made of thether statutes before And then it is a general rule Quod posteriores leges priori bus contrarias abrogant And some thinkes at this daye for wardes lands or ideots landes there shal bee no lettynge of them to ferme to him that tended the trauers if they were letten before the trauers tended by the maister of the kinges wardes but of other landes it remaines as it was before the making of this statute of a .31 Henry .8 and note that if the kinge seise not for anye Wardshippe but onelye for primer seisin because the heire is of full age if a straunger in this case wil trauerse it is to litle purpose For if the kinge by and by after will make liuerie to the heire the trauerse is become voide as appeareth 1. Henry .7 fo â— for the kinge in that case hathe no cause to reteine the lande but to deliuer the same to him in whoe 's right he seised being able for it and hee that tended the trauers is at no mischiefe for hee may nowe after this liuerie pursue for his remedye against the heire and if it shoulde tarrye in the kings handes for the trauerse sake his highnes shoulde then haue all the profites if the trauers were founde with him for al the time that the saide trauers did depende whereunto hys highnes hath no right but onelye the heire and therefore it seemes there shall bee no trauerse but where the landes is to abyde in the kinges handes for a certeine tyme as for Wardshippe fine for alienacion or suche lyke But if hee that tended the trauerse bee founde heire by office and is to haue liuerie of that lande as well as the other that was first founde heire otherwise it is for the reason made beefore And so of an enterpleder For in that case the kinge is bounde to make the liuerie too him that is tried rightfull heire but not so in the case of a trauerse tended by a straunger whiche claimes not as heire for hee is to haue noe lyuerie but only an ouster le maine by whych ouster le main the kinge deliuereth nothinge but leaues his owne possession as one that hath no right to keepe the possession anye longer And it appeareth sufficientlye that hee hadde no right to keepe it after the tyme the heire that shoulde haue it was of full age Wherefore a straunger in that case cannot trauerse for so twoe that hadde no right by trauersinge together might keepe the thirde that hath right from his possession whiche was neuer the meaninge of the makers of the saide statutes And notwithstanding that this booke 1. H. 7 bee that after the trauerse and before the ferme graunted the liuerie was made yet that makes no difference for whether the ferme were graunted before the lyuerie or after when the trauers is become voide by the liuerie the ferme whiche dependeth vppon the same is also voide as mee seemeth And note also that the saide statute 1. Hen. 8. whiche geeues three monethes for hauinge the landes to ferme makes no mencion of the tresorer of Englande but onelye of the Chaunceller so that for anye thinge that ys to bee letten by force of that statute it must bee done onlye by the Chauncellour and not by the treasorer As it shoulde seeme as well of offices retourned into theschequer as into the Chauncerie and therefore within the moneth after an office retourned into theschequer the tresorer maye let the landes to ferme to him that tendes the trauerse accordinge to the saide statute 8. H. 6. But if it bee to let after the moneth the Chaunceller of Englande must doe it as it should seeme And note also that by a statute made anno 1. H. 8. cap. 11. Any person that sued his liuere in time of king H. 7. vppon anye office that founde hee helde in chiefe where in dede he helde not in chiefe whiche saide offices were found by the procurement of Empson and Dudley in the tyme of the said late kinge maye trauerse thoffice in like maner and forme as he might haue done before the liuerie sued if it be so that he be now seised of the same landes sauing that hee shall not bee restored to the meane issues and profites This statute seemes not to extende to the parties heires that hadde liuerie but onelye to the partie him selfe Quere hoc And note that in the court where thoffice is first retourned into there I shall tende my trauers as if it bee retourned into the Chauncerie then in the Chauncerye and if in the Eschequer then in theschequer as in deede all offices virtute officij are retournable in theschequer onelye and such as bee virtute breuis vel commissionis bee retournable in the Chauncerie And now by the Statute of .33 H. 8. cap. 22. No eschetour maye sitte virtute officij onely to fynde anye office of landes holden of the kinge of the value of v. li. or aboue vppon paine to forfait v. li. Monstrance de droit THe Statute of an .36 E .3 that geeueth a trauerse saithe in this wise Et sil eit nul home qui met challenge ou claime aus terres issint seisies que leschetour maunde lenquest en la chauncellarie deins le mois apres les terres issint seisies et que briefe luy soit liuere de certifier la cause de sa seisin en la Chancellarie et illeoques soit oye sauns delaye de
reuersion to an other in this case he in the reuersion hadde an Ouster le mayne withoute suinge anye Scire facias againste the patentee as it appeareth in .10 Edwarde the thirde and at this daye the case is more stronger for suche a graunt were voide beecause it is beefore office And therefore vppon anye suche voide graunt there neede no Scire facias And in .14 Edwarde the fowerth fo 1. it appearethe that one had trauersed an office whiche was sente into the kinges benche to trye and had forgotten to sue his Scire facias and yet hee was suffred to goe agayne into the Chauncerie to pray a Scire facias vpon the first trauerse for it was saide that the Chauncerie is a courte of conscyence and for that cause the thinge that was there amisse may be reformed at all times And learne if this Scire facias bee sued againste manye and one of them dyeth whether this shal abate the trauerse Monstrans de droit or peticion wheruppon it is sued or elles onelye the Scire facias It semes that nothinge shall abate but the Scire facias because no mentiō is made of the tenaunt neither in a trauerse Monstrans de droit of peticion And of this mater see the booke in M. 7 H. 4. fo ◠Ouster le mayne OVster le main is the iugement that is geuen for hym that tendeth a trauerse or sueth a Mōstrans de droit or peticion for when it appeareth vpon the matter discussed that the kinge hathe no righte nor title to the thinge he seised then iudgement shal bee geeuen in the Chauncerie that the handes bee amoued and thereuppon Amoueas manum shal bee awarded to theschetour whiche conteruailes as muche as if the iudgemente weare geeuen that hee shoulde haue againe his lande as appeareth in 24 E. 3 f. 3◠and this iugement sometime is geuen in the kinges bench and not in the chauncerie that is in case where the parties descende to an issue then for the tryall thereof theye of the chauncerie muste awarde a venire facias returnable in the kings benche at a certaine daye at whiche day notwithstandinge that the shirife returne not the writ yet the Alias venire facias shall not bee awarded out of the chācerie but oute of the kinges bench for there and no where els it is recorded quod vicecomes non misit breue as appeareth in .13 E. 4. f. 8. And when the issu is found for the partie they of the kinges bench shall gaue iugement awarde an ouster le maine without suinge for the same in the chaūcerie as appeareth in 21. H. 7. .29 Liuery P. 10 li. ass and yet the recorde of the issue that was tryed was not sent thether but onelye the transcript thereof but what then the iudgement is to be geuen vpon the verdit which is there of recorde and when bothe courtes bee courtes of the common lawe and the kynges courts theye vse not to remaunde anye thynge to the place from whence it came but to geue iugem̄t there where it is tryed and Sharde sayde that when a recorde comes once into the kynges benche it shall neuer go from thence Also note that sometime there goeth an Ouster le mayne as well to the kinges patentee as to the eschetoure and that is where the kinge hath graunted the thing that hee seised to any other but notwithstanding that there go such wryttes of Amoueas manum bothe to theschetor and to the partie yet the kynge is out of possession as sone as iugement is geuen in the chauncerie not forcing whether any of these wryttes bee awarded or not either to theschetoure or to the partye and thereupon the partie for whom iudgemente is geeuen may entre forth with into the landes and shal bee sayde noe intrudor Assise P. 156. as appeareth in H. 10. E. 3. and the reason of yt is because the iugement tyethe not the kynge to the delyuerye of the possession but onely to leaue hys handes of the possessiō And note that if a Diem clausit come to the eschetor he hy vertue of that wryte beefore he make any enquirie may seise the lande for the kynges beehofe whiche after he hath once seised if after by office noe title bee found for the king then the party that ought to haue agayn the land may sue for the same in the chauncerye where the office is returned and then Amoueas manum shall be awarded for vntill the makynge of a statute at Lincoln Anno .29 E. 1. called the statute De escaetoribus the partie hadde noe remedye in suche case but onelye to sue vnto the kinge himselfe as it appearethe by the sayde statute and nowe that statute geeues an Ouster le maine vna cum exitibus Howbeit this Ouster le mayne maye not bee sued by parcels no more than a liuery and therefore if diuerse writtes or commissions bee awarded into diuers counties to enquire after the death of A. B and in one countie it is founde that hee holdethe nothynge of the kinge but in socage and in the same countie and bye the same ēquest it is foūd that he holdeth of an other by knights seruice yet the lord by knights seruice gettethe noe Ouster le main vntil the other ēquests be also returned in Causa qua sup̄ for if he should then he should haue it for the lands and not for the body and so should haue it by parcelles for the bodie may not be deliuered as long as there is anye enquest to be returned in And the reason of it is beecause that enqueste may finde a tenure of the king by knights seruice in chiefe in which case his highnes ought to haue the whole landes and if it bee but a cōmen tenure by knyghtes seruice yet hys highnesse at the leaste oughte to haue the preferrement of the bodye yea thoughe the lorde of whom it is founde to be holden be the archebyshoppe of Caunt or suche a one against whō the kings prerogatiue will not hold for the landes yet because it holds for the bodies he getteth no Ouster le maine vntil al the offices be returned in for the reason before made as appeareth in 16. E. 3. Liuerie p. 29 Howbeit by fauour and grace of the court tharchebishoppe had his Ouster le maine beefore the other offices retourned And so note howe in tymes past men haue sued Ouster le maine vpon a seisin made for the kynge although the office founde afterward did not entitle his highnes Howbeit at this day it is not so vsed for theschetor will not seise vnlesse there be an office found although he might lawfullye do it by the words of the writ Diem clausit whiche vsage I do nothinge mislike consideringe the great trouble it auoideth that might els ensue to the kinges subiectes And note that in all cases where the king is seised or in possession of the lād by office or any other mater of recorde his highnes
seisin can not be deliuered out of him vntill suche time an Ouster le maine bee sued as if the king be seysed by office of the lande of any Idiots or for aÌ„nuÌ„ diem vastuÌ„ of lands of any that is attainted in these cases he that shoulde haue these landes after the kynges title determined muste sue an Ouster le maine otherwise yt is where the kyng is not seised of the land but only entitled to the profites as of the landes of him that is outlawed in a personall action or of clerke conuicte or suche like there nede no Ouster le mayne to be sued as appeareth in .8 E. 2. 4. Trauers 28. E. 3. and .9 H. 6. f. 20. and if the landes whiche is seysed into the kynges handes bee holden ioyntlye bye manye yet euery one of them by hymselfe may sue hys Ouster le maine of his owne parte withoute his companions as appeareth in .2 Assise p. 166. H. 4. Lyuerye THe maner of the suing of a generall liuery doth partly appere in the title of Liuerie in the great abridgemeÌ„t of Iustice Fitsherbert A. 12. H. 4. ti Liuerie p. 4. A. 21. R. 2. ti Liuerie p. 5. Wher it is declared that after the heire that was in the kings warde is come to full age then a writ De etate probanda shal be awarded vnto the shirife of the shiere where the said heire was borne to eÌ„quire of his age in which case it is required by the lawe that euerye one that shall passe in that enquest shal be of the age of .xliij. yeares meaning therby that they euery one of them shoulde be of full age at birth of the childe beecause that suche haue better knowledge and remembraunce then other of lesser age haue and that the heire that is in warde enforme the enquest by certaine signes and tokens of the tyme of his birthe as to say that that yeare there was a great tempeste or a greate plague or suche like which signes so geuen in euidence shal be returned by the shiriue as well as the principall mater But whether it bee requisite to haue xij or a lesse number in the sayde enquest or not learn for soome think that any number from two vpwarde will serue beecause the triall is by proues and see the newe Natura breui um fo 136. wher it appereth that this writ of Etate ê“banda was directed to the eschetour of the countie where hee was borne and not to the shiriue Howebeeit note alwayes that theye wheare the lande is shall neuer enquire of this mater vnlesse the birthe and lande weare bothe in one shiere for theye haue enquired of it allredy that is to say when theye dyd fynde the firste offyce Thus when theye haue founde his age that enqueste shall bee returned into the Chauncerie and from thence shal bee awarded a write to the Lorde Keeper of the priuie seale signifying vnto him that the heire is of full age and vppon that a priuie seal shall bee directed to the Chamberlaine of Englande to receiue his homage whiche beynge receiued the sayde lorde Chamberlaine shall certifie the lorde Chaunceller by write of the receipte thereof and then shall the heire haue his liuerie But it seemes that if the heire were neuer in warde but of full age at death of his auncester and so founde by office that thenne hee shall haue liuerie as is declared vppon that office onelye without suynge anye write of Etate probanda for the writtes of liuerie in thys case make no mention of anye Etate probanda as they doe in the other case but if the heire bee withein age and in the kyngs warde and after when he comes to his ful age other landes descende vnto him whiche the kynge allso seisethe by an enqueste that fyndes the heire of full age yet this not withstandynge hee must now sue an Etate probanda vppon bothe offices as appearethe in M. 13. Henrye the fowerthe And the reason of it is M. 13 H. 4. beecause the fyndynge of hym of full age is but as voide as longe as there is a recorde whiche founde hym within age to the whiche record the kynge mighte cleaue vnto as the best recorde that makethe for hym vntyll suche tyme the contrarie thereof be proued bye the wryte of Etate probanda Howebeeit at this day the statut made Anno. 33. H. 8. hath much abridged the fees that haue bene geuen vpon the sute of a general liuerie namely for liueries to be sued of clere yearely value of v. li. or vnder and that it may be sued without any office to be founde But I do not see that the maner of the sute is in any other point altered or changed by the sayd statute but it remaines as it did before And that statute also geueth men licence to sue a generall liuerie of landes not excedinge the cleare yerelye value of .xx. li. whereby I see no let but that a man may sue his generall liuerie also for landes aboue the yerely value of xx li. as he might haue done before the makynge thereof for this statute is not contrarie to anye lawe that was before in that pointe sauinge that a general lyue uerie vnder the value of .xx. li. can not passe or be sued yf he haue not firste his warrant from the maister of the kynges wardes and liueries surueyours atturneys and generall receiuour or three of them signed and subscribed with their names and hands Thus may you see the maner of the suing forth of a generall liuerie which liuerie may not be sued by parcelles as I haue sayde before but entierlye that is to say of all the landes the kinge is or ought to be seised of in his right that sues the liuerie And therefore if the heyre sue liuery but of parcell of that that is founde by office or yf the auncester we are seised of other landes than are fouÌ„d bye office yf the heire sue his generall lyuerie beefore an offyce thereof founde omittinge them in the liuerye the lyuery is missued T. 12. R. 2.44 E. 3. f. 1â— et 25. 2. H. 7. f. 2. as appereth in .12 R. 2. 44 E. 3. 2. H. 7. and therefore it beehoues the heire beefore hee sue his lyuerye to cause an office to bee foynde in euerye sheere where hys auncester hadde anye landes And this entier lyuerye is intended as well of landes holden of other lordes beinge in the kinges handes as of the landes that are holden of the kinge and therefore if a manne holde of the king in chiefe by knightes seruice and of other lordes in socage and die his heir being a daughter within the age of xiiii yeres in this case when the sayd daughter cometh of the age of xiiii yeres she getteth no liuerie of the lands holden in socage but must tarry till she be of the age of xvi yeres that she may then sue liuerie of the whole as appereth .35 H. 6.