estate if the sale be not effectuall and in case the vendor have no warrant for such goods by him sold No living Cattell shall be sold but onely in Cities Ll. Gulielm cap. 60. and before three witnesses nor shall any thing forbidden be sold without warranty No faires or markets shall be holden but onely in Cities Ibid. c. 61. Burroughs walled Towns and Castles These Lawes concerning sales and markets were ancient Saxon lawes and tend all to the avoyding of cheating men of their Cattell by surreptitious sale of them made by such as had no right Goods found shall be published by the finder to the neighbourhood Ll. Gulielm cap. 7. and if any makes claime and proofe of them to be his he shall have them giving security to bring them into the Court in case any other shall within a yeere and a day make his claim thereto The children of persons intestate shall equally divide the heritage Ll. Gulielm cap. 36. This is in terminis the Saxon law and therefore concerning it I shall referre to the same formerly recited onely I shall adde hereto the law of Henry the first Ll. Hen. I which may serve as an explanation of the former Any free man may devise his chattels by will and if he die intestate his wife children parents or next kinne shall divide the same for his soules good The first branch whereof was ancient and doubtlesse in continuall use but the iniquity of the Norman rude times was such that the Lords under surmise of arreares or reliefe would seise all the personall estate after the tenants death and so the right of last wils was swallowed up but this restoreth the power of last wils into its place and in case the party died intestate preserveth a kind of nature of descent although they be more personall Nor doth that last clause of the soules good disannull the same although the words may seem to carry away the benefit to some other hand For the whole matter is left to the discretion of such as are next to the intestate CHAP. LII Of Laws that concerne common interest of Lands THe Laws that concerne Lands and peculiarly belonging to the Normans are such as concerne principally the tenure of Lands which if duly considered although savoured somewhat of the King yet little of the Conquerour for generally it must be granted that tenures long before and after this time were as the services ordered according to the will of the giver in which as the King had the greatest share and he the most publique person of all so were his donations ordered chiefly to advance the publique service and in this regard the tenure by Knight service might more principally challenge the Kings regard then the regard of all the great men besides But this was not the soare yea rather it was the beauty and strength of the Kingdome and for which the King deserved an honorable name above most of his progenitors who had not so much land to dispose of as he had and therefore could not advance that service in any proportion equall unto him The sore that caused so many sighes was the incumbrances raised upon this most Noble and free service which through the evill of times by this meanes became the most burthensome and the onely loathed and abhorred service of all the rest I say through the evill of times for it cannot lodge in my thoughts but in the Norman times the incumbrances were nothing so great as of latter ages and that much hath been imputed to the Lawes of the Conquerour which they never deserved as may appeare in these particulars which the Laws of Henry the first have preserved in memory Tenant of the King or other Lord dying 1 Reliefe M. Paris An. 1100 1213 his heire shall pay no other reliefe then what by Law is due That which by Law is due is set down in the laws of William the Conquerour The Reliefe of an Earle Ll. Gulielm cap. 12. 8. Horses sadled and bridled 4. Helmets 4. Cotes of Maile 4. Shields 4. Speares 4. Swords 4. Chasers bridled and sadled 1. Palfray bridled and sadled The Reliefe of a Baron Ibid. c. 23. 4. Horses with Saddles Bridles 2. Helmets 2. Cotes of Maile 2. Sheilds 2. Speares 2. Swords 2. Chasers bridled and sadled 1. Palfray bridled and sadled The Reliefe of a Vavasor to his Lord Ibid. c. 24. His best Horse His Helmet His Cote of Maile His Shield His Speare His Sword Or if he had no Armes then he was to pay s. 100 The reliefe of the Countrey man is the best beast that is in his possession Ll. Gulielm cap. 29. and of him that farmeth his Lands a yeeres rent These are the Reliefes due by law and now setled in goods or armes but afterwards turned into money and its likely that the ill customes in the former times did extort both money and armes or such summes of money as they pleased and by the very words of the law it seemes they had brought it to an arbitrary power to take what they could get and yet all against Law 2. Marriage The Kings tenant shall advise with the King in marriage of his daughter sister neece or kinswoman and his widdow in like manner The sence hereof in short is that these might marry at their own will without paying fine or composition to the Lord and yet must have the liking of the Lord so farre as to declare whether the man intended were his enemy or not and fit to performe Knight service This law was therefore grounded upon the present distresse of affaires wherein the nation was unsetled and common right having established a mutuall trust between Lord and Tenant found out this meanes to preserve the same for if the marriages of those that are related to the Tenant in such manner as may inherit part or all his lands or have joynture therein should be left altogether at the liberty of the Tenant or his widow it must needs follow that the mutuall trust between Lord and Tenant must faile and the publique receive dammage And therefore if this custome were of Norman birth it was begotten bpon a Saxon law and might the rather be owned by the English 3. Dower The widdow of the Kings Tenant having children shall have her dower and portion so long as she keeps unmarried The portion here is in the Latine word maritagium which I take to be the marriage portion given by the husband according to the Saxon custome when as the dower in land was not in use whereof is spoken formerly in that Chapter of dower And the Normans were necessitated to introduce this custome of theirs with themselves partly because it was a priviledge which was their own by birth and it could not be waved without an evident wrong done to the wives of these men who had ventured their lives in that service but principally because it would not consist with
the worke in hand to disclaime that custome which must needs be of infinite consequence in the effecting of what was principally sought after viz. the union of the two peoples Normans and Saxons into one I say it was principally sought after by the Norman conquerour if not led thereto by his own genius yet necessitated thereto by force of reason of state as shall appeare hereafter And what could be imagined a more ready way to stay the effusion of blood and all other unhappy events of enmity then by taking away enmity it selfe or a more speedy and certaine course for union then to reduce the men and women of each people to mutuall society and to seale up all by a lasting bond of marriage or greater encouragement for the comfortable proceedings therein then the setling of the constant maintenance of the wife in case of survivorship by the law of dower of the Lands and Tenements of the Husband Lindenbrog Concil Aenham c. 19. Ll. Edm. which was so full of contingencies and uncertainties in the portion of goods that was by the Saxon law appointed to the wife in such case Nor was this all for by marriage thus made to the Normans they had a great hold not so much over the English as in the English and that not onely during coverture but by reason of this title of Dower the women became tenants and under the Lords wing so as they durst not willingly and illegally offend their Lord in their widdowhood nor by law nor reason match themselves and their dowry to any other that was not first allowed by the Lord to be in friendship with him and thus became the tenants widdows to be at the liking of the Lord for their marriage and the like hereto may be said concerning the husband in case of tenant by the curtesie Miror fo 20. and however by the Norman former practise it was much disturbed yet by Henry the first it was again reduced to its former right rather then originall arising from his grant as some hold and proved advantagious for the ends aforesaid Now as touching their marriage portion of goods because the Saxon law had already endowed them thereof they could not be induced to lay down their known ancient right till they found the new law of dower to settle and so for some time both laws were in force untill the more ancient Saxon law had an honourable buriall Neverthelesse for the present the law abridged that right so farre as to limit it to the widdow during widdowhood according to the former Saxon law Upon consideration of all which it may well be conceived that the power of the Lords in consenting or dissenting to the marriages of their tenants widdows and wards was not so much an usurpation upon the common right of the English subjects as a custome rationally and with great wisdome as the course of affaires then stood upholden and allowed amongst them principally for the speedy setling of a peaceable government and consolidating of two Nations into one and wherein England was then so happy as to come to a conclusion in seven yeeres which cost their ancestors nigh two hundred yeeres experience with the Britons besides a world of bloodshed that might have been spared ere they could finde out the right way to a desired peace by mutuall marriages had between them cap. 4. 4. Wardship Such widdow shall have the custody of the Lands of such children or otherwise such other person as by right ought to have the same This is the first news of Wardships that passed abroad cum privilegio of a received Law which together with the former declare the right custome of the Normans M. Paris and thereby the injustas consuetudines quibus Angliae regnum opprimebatur viz. Arbitrary reliefe taken of the Tenants estate arbitrary marriages made of their persons and arbitrary grants of guardianship of their lands for as yet oppression was not so high flown as to cast the government of the persons of their Wards out of the view of the Lords provisionary care upon adventure of the next inlaw whether man or woman wise or unwife under pretence to train him up in military service fit for the Lords own safety and the Kingdomes lifeguard but it was the proper ground of the Lords own seisure and right of wardship he being looked upon by the eye of common reason as the onely meet man that both could and would effect that worke so as might be most advantagious to the publique which seemed to be chiefly concerned herein and upon the same generall ground the survey of fooles accompanied the former albeit it was not in practise till Henry the first brought it in as the Mirror of justice saith fo 258. Ll. Canut 37. yet it came upon an ancient foundation laid in the time of the Danes For my own part I will not dispute the point whether this custome of Wardship was purely Norman or whether it was derived from the Saxons anciently who possibly might have some respect to Orphans in such cases to traine them up for the publique service in point of war especially being possessors of a known right of reliefe as well as Alfred the Saxon King did undertake the worke for the training of some such particular persons in learning for the service of the publique Asser Menev. in time of peace and civill government yet thus much appeareth that guardianship of Lands was a known custome enough to make and maintaine a right and that it by law was a right belonging to some persons before others and that this had been a custome before the former unjust customs crept into government of the Conquerour and principally of his sonne Rufus and though it be questionable whether it setled first upon the Normans or the English yet its manifest that if one people had it the other people now comming into union with that people could not in reason except against that custome which the other people had taken up upon so honorable grounds as reason of State which as the times then were was evident and superlative especially the customes being under the regulating of Law and not of any arbitrary power and can be no presidents of the reliefe marriage and wardship that after ages usurped Tenants in Knights service shall hold their Lands cap. 5. c. acquitted of all taxes 5. Acquittall that they may be more able to provide Armes and be more ready and fit for the Kings service and defence of the Kingdome This law whither it be a renewing of a former custome or an introduction of a new Law it s cleare it was upon an old ground That Tenants by Knight service must be ready for the service of their Lord and defence of the kingdome whereof afterwards But the law is that these men shall hold their lands of that tenure acquitted of all taxes though legally imposed upon the body of the Kingdome which must be
the higher nature the party though not the Kings tenant lost his personal estate to the King for ever his free holds also for a yeere and a day after which they returned to the Lord of the soile by way of escheat It seemeth also that the losse not onely of chattels and goods but also of lands c. extended to Outlaries I conceive in case of Felony and the Kings pardon in such case could not bind the Lords right of escheate although it might discharge the goods and the yeere and the day whereunto the King was entituled which case alone sufficiently declareth what power Kings had in the estates of their subjects Manslaughter 5. Manslaughter made not bailable This was law in Henry the seconds time although it crossed the Norman Law Glanvil l. 14. cap. 1 3. and questionlesse it was upon good ground for the times now were not as those in the Conquerours times when shedding of blood was accounted valour and in most cases in order to the publique service And now it seems it was a growing evill and that cried so loud as though in case of Treason baile might be allowed yet not in this case ubi ad terrorem aliter statutum est saith the authour Robbers 6. Robbery shall be committed to the Sheriffe or in his absence to the next Castelane who shall deliver him to the Sheriffe And the Justices shall doe right to them and unto trespassers upon Land Ll. Gul. 4. Spicil 174. By the Conquerours law these offenders were bailable and I conceive this was no repeale thereof and the rather because Glanvile alloweth of pledges in all cases except Manslaughter yea in those crimes that did wound Majesty it selfe Glanvil lib. 14. cap. 1. although they concerne the destruction of the Kings person or sedition in the Kingdome or Army thereof The Justices herein mentioned were intended to be the Justices itinerant and the trespasses upon Land are meant such as are contra pacem Domini Regis as riotous and forcible entries for some trespasses were against the peace of the Sheriffe as formerly hath been observed Fauxonry 7. Fauxonry Glanvil lib. 14 cap. 7. is of severall degrees or kinds some against the King others against other men and of those against the King some are punished as wounds of Majesty as falsifying the Kings charter and whether falsifying of money were in that condition or not I leave or falsifying of measures yet more inferiour I cannot determine but its cleare by Glanvile that falsifying of the deed of a private person was of smaller consideration and at the utmost deserved but losse of member Inheritances may not be aliened 8. Glanvil lib. 7. cap. 1. Ibid. c. 5. Inheritances were in those times of lands or goods for it was the custome then that the personall estate the debts deducted was divisible into three parts one whereof belonged in right to the wife as her reasonable part the other to the heire and third to the testator to make his will of them and of the other two parts he could not dispose by will Concerning Lands it was regularly true that no man could alien his whole inheritance to the disherisin of his heire either by act in his life time or any part thereof by his last will without the concurrance of the heire But of purchased lands he may give part by act executed in his life time though he have no Lands by inheritance and if he hath no issue then he may alien all And where a man hath Lands by inheritance and also by purchase he may alien all his purchased lands as he pleaseth If the lands be holden in Gavel kinde no more of the inheritance can be conveyed to any of the children then their proportionable parts will amount unto This law of inheritance was divers according to the tenure for the lands in knight-Knight-service alwaies discended to the heire but such as were holden in soccage passed according to the custome either to the eldest or to the youngest or to all equally And thus stood the generall state of inheritance from the Normans times hitherto Ll. Hen 1. c. 88. seeming somewhat too strait for the free men that by law of property might challenge a power to doe with their own as they pleased But the Normans saw a double prejudice herein the first was the danger of ruine of many of their families who now ingrafted into the English stocke and yet not fully one might expect a late checke to their preferments from the Saxon parents after a long and faire semblance made of their good will The second prejudice was the decay of their Militia which was maintained by riches more then by multitude of men partly because that rich men are most fearfull of offending and therefore ordinarily are most serviceable both with their bodies and estates against publique dangers and partly because by their friends and allies they bring more ayd unto the publique by ingaging them in the common cause that otherwise might prove unsensible of the condition of their Country The heire of a free man shall by descent be in such seism as 9. his ancester had at the time of his death Vide Glanv l. 7. c 9. doing service and paying releif and shall have his chattailes If the heire be under age the Lord shall have the Wardship for the due time and the wife her Dower and part of the goods If the Lord withhold seisin the Kings Justice shall trie the matter by twelve men The first of these branches is declaratory of a ground of common law but being applied to the last is an introduction of a new law of triall of the heires right by Assize of Mortdancester where formerly no remedy was left to the heire but a Writ of right If these three branches be particularly observed they speake of three sorts of heires of tenants by Knight-service viz. such as are majors or of full age and such as are minors or under age and such as are of a doubtfull age Those that are of full age at the death of their ancestors may possesse the lands descended and the Lord may not disseise him thereof but may be resisted by the heire in the maintenance of his possession so as he be ready to pay reliefe and doe service that is due and if the Lord expell him he shall have remedy by Assize Those heires that are minors shall be under the Lords guardianship till they come to one and twenty yeeres Tbe heires of such as hold by soccage are said to be at full age at fifteene yeeres because at that age they were thought able to doe that service but the sonnes of Burgesses are then said to be of full age when they have ability to mannage their fathers calling such as telling of money measuring of cloath and the like yet doth not Glanvile or any other say that these were their full age to all purposes albeit that some Burroughs at
this day hold the last in custome to all intents whatsoever The last branch provideth the remedy to recover to the heire his possession in case it be detained either through doubtfulnesse of age of the heire or his title and it directs the issue to be tried by twelve men This triall some have thought to be of Glanvils invention and it may well be that this triall of this matter as thus set down was directed by him yet he useth often in his booke the word solet and in his preface saith that he will set down frequentius usitata and its past question but that the triall by twelve men was much more ancient as hath been already noted One thing more yet remaineth concerning the widdow of the tenant whose dower is not onely provided for but her reasonable part of her husbands personall estate The originall hereof was from the Normans and it was as popular as that of Wardships was Regall and so they made the English women as sure to them as they were sure of their children The Justices shall by Assize try disseisins done since the Kings 10. comming over Sea next after the peace made between him and his sonne This is called the Assize of Novel disseisin or of disseisins lately made It seems that the limitation was set for the Justices sake who now were appointed to that worke which formerly belonged to the County courts Glanv lib. 13. cap. 33. and to prevent intrenchments of Courts a limitation was determined although the copy seemeth to be mistaken for the limitation in the writ is from the Kings last voyage or going into Normandy Justices shall doe right upon the Kings writ for halfe a 11. Knights fee and under unlesse in cases of difficulty which are to be referred to the King The Justices itinerant ended the smaller matters in their circuits the other were reserved to the King in his bench Justices shall inquire of Escheates Lands Churches and 12. women in the Kings gift And of Castle guard who how much and where So as the Judges itinerant had the worke of Escheators and made their circuits serve as well for the Kings profit as Justice to the subjects They used also to take fealty of the people to the King at one certaine time of the yeere and to demand homage also These matters of the Kings Exchequer made the presence of the Judges lesse acceptable and it may be occasioned some kind of oppression And as touching Castleguard it was a tenure in great use in these bloody times and yet it seemeth they used to take rent instead of the personall service else had that enquiry how much been improper 13. Of a tenants holding and of severall Lords That one man may hold severall lands of severall Lords and so owe service to them all is so common as nothing can be more neverthelesse it will not be altogether out of the way to touch somewhat upon the nature of this mutuall relation between Lord and Tenant in generall that the true nature of the diversity may more fully appeare The foundation or subject of service was a piece of land or other tenement at the first given by the Lord to the Tenant in affirmance of a stipulation between them presupposed by the giving and receiving whereof the tenant undertooke to performe service to the Lord Glanv lib. 9. cap. 4. and the Lord undertooke protection of the tenant in his right to that tenement The service was first by promise solemnly bound either by oath which the Lord or his deputy by the common law hath power to administer as in the case of fealty in which the tenant bound himselfe to be true to the honour and safety of his Lords person and to perform the service due to the Lord for the tenement so given or otherwise by the tenants humble acknowledgement and promise not onely to performe the services due but even to be devoted to the Lords service to honour him and to adventure limbe and life and to be true and faithfull to the Lord. This is called Homage from those words I become your man Sir and yet promiseth upon the matter no more but fealty in a deeper complement albeit there be difference in the adjuncts belonging to each For though it be true that by promise of being the Lords man a generall service may seem to be implied yet in regard that it is upon occasion onely of that present tenure it seemeth to me that it is to be restrained onely to those particular services which belong to that tenement and therefore if that tenement be holden in soccage although the tenant be bound to homage yet that homage ties not the tenant to the service of a Knight Lit. lib. 2. cap. 5 nor contrarily doth the homage of a tenant in Knight service tie him to that of socage upon the command of his Lord though he professeth himselfe to be his man Nor doth the tenants homage binde him against all men nor ad semper for in case he holdeth of two or divers Lords by homage for severall tenements Glanv lib. 9. cap. 1. Lib. 7. cap. 10. and these two Lords be in warre one against the other the tenant must serve his chiefe Lord of whom the capitall house is holden or that Lord which was his by priority who may be called the chiefe Lord because having first received homage he received it absolutely from his tenant but all other Lords receive homage of such tenant with a saving of the tenants faith made to other Lords and to the King who in order to the publique had power to command a tenant into warre against his own Lord. If therefore he be commanded by the King in such cases unto warre he need not question the point of forfeiture Glanvil lib. 9. cap. 1. but if he be commanded by a chiefe of his other Lords into warre against a party in which another of his Lords is engaged his safest way is to enter upon the worke because of his allegiancc to that Lord yet with a salvo of his fealty to that other Lord. Ibid. cap. 4. But in all ordinary cases tenants and Lords must have regard to their stipulation for otherwise if either breake the other is discharged for ever and if the fault be in the tenant his tenement escheats to his Lord and if the Lord faile he loses his tenure and the tenant might thence forth disclaime and hold over for ever Neverthelesse the Lords had two priviledges by common custome belonging to their tenures which although not mentioned in the stipulation were yet more valuable then all the rest the one concerning matter of profit the other of power That of profit consisted in ayds and reliefe The ayds were of three kinds Ibid. c. 8. one to make the Lords eldest sonne Knight the other to marry his eldest daughter the third to helpe him to pay a reliefe to his Lord Paramont which in my opinion
rules for government I remember it s affirmed by some of those ancient Writers that the Duke or King would have brought in the customes of Norwey but the earnest mediation of the English prevailed against it and it evinceth two things to my opinion first that there was question made what law should be established Secondly that notwithstanding the interest that the Normans had in the Kingdome they could not prevaile to bring in the whole body of their law or of the customes of Norwey which were not onely the prima materia of their law but also in kind had a setling at that very time in those places of this Kingdome where the Danes had their principall seate and therefore not altogether strange to the Saxons themselves The summe of which will be this that upon debate a law must be setled and that not the law of the Conquerours own will nor the law that suits with his desire but the ancient law of the Kingdome and therefore if at any time the unquietnesse of some of the English brought the King to some thoughts of arbitrary rule and to shake off the clog of Saxon law it was long ere it stirred and sprang up too late to raise the title of conquest and withered too soon to settle it As touching the change of customes for that also is imputed to the Conquerour it cannot be denied but some alteration might be in matters of smaller consideration yet are the Writers not without mistake in the particular instances For whereas they tell us that the Conquerour tooke away the custome of Gavell kinde and brought the custome of discent to the eldest sonne and that Kent saved their liberties and continued this custome of Gavell kinde I shall not contend about the liberties of Kent but must till I see better reason hold the opinion of the change of inheritance to be a meere conceit For besides what hath been already said concerning that custome of Gavell kind if we believe Glanvile the difference was between Lands holden by Knights service Lib. 7. cap. 3. and in socage the first of which in his time by ancient custome alwaies descended to the eldest and those Lands that were holden in Socage if not partible by custome in which case they went equally to all the sonnes went by custome in some places to the eldest in other places to the youngest so as the rule of inheritance in the Norman times was custome as well as in former times And furthermore if the custome of Gavell kind had been the generall custome of this Nation the King by his change had contradicted his own Prerogative and granted as great a liberty to his subjects as could have been invented For had the custome of Gavell kind happened upon the Lands in Knight service it had brought all the sonnes under the law of Wardship and had made a ready way to inthrall all men of worth and undoe all husbandry the first whereof had been as advantagious to the Kings private interest as both destructive to the publique Nor is it cleare from any Authour of credit that the Normans changed the tenures of Lands albeit that it cannot be denied but such Lands as he had by forfeiture or otherwise were in his own power to dispose upon what tenure he pleased for as well before the Normans time as long after tenures were like as the services were all at the will of the donor and were of as many individuals almost as the minds of the owners some being of more generall regard and publique use Littlet are recorded amongst the grounds of English laws none of which appeare to me to be of Norman originall although they received their names according to that dialect The next thing objected is the change of Language which thing some Writers tell us the King endeavoured or which is worse to be so absolute as to be absolute tyrant and to publish laws in a forreigne language that the people through ignorance might the rather transgresse and thereby forfeit their estates This if true so far differed from the nature of a Conquerour as rather proveth that he was put to his shifts Neverthelesse the thing tasteth so much of spleen as it might occasion distrust of other relations concerning this subject For besides that it is nonsence for a Conquerour to entitle himselfe by a cheat where he hath an elder title by conquest I shall in full answer to that calumny insert a passage of an Historian that was in the continuall view of publique affaires in those times who speaking of the Conquerour saith That he commended the Confessors laws to his Justices in the same Language wherein they were wonted formerly to be written Ingulfus lest through ignorance the people might rashly offend And another Authour saith M. Paris fragm Gulielm that the King had a desire to learn the English tongue that he might the better know their Law and judge according thereto It s probable neverthelesse that the laws were in the Norman tongue and it s no lesse likely that the pleadings in reall actions especially were also in the same Language else must the Normans be put to schoole to learne English upon perill of losse of their estates but that either the written laws were wholy concluded into the Norman Tongue or that the publique pleading of causes by word of mouth in all actions where the issue was left to the Countrey were in any other Language then English no advised Reader will conceive seeing it had been a madnesse for an English Jury to passe their verdict in any case wherein its likely many of them understood scarce a syllable of the Norman language much lesse ought of the matter upon which their verdict should be grounded Adde hereunto that it s not likely but the Conquerour inhibited the use of the English language in all matters of publique Record in as much as the Charters made by him to corporate Towns and Franchises were sometimes in the Saxon more generally in the Latine but seldome or never in the Norman dialect and that pleadings and indictments were entered in like manner in the Latine Tongue as formerly by an old custome brought in by the Clergy was used for the Clergy who had gotten the Key of knowledge and Law into their own custody layd it up in that Language whereof the Commons had little knowledge that they might thereby be enforced to depend upon these men for justice as well as for piety The Normans therefore either found it too hard to alter the former custome in such cases or else thought it the wisest way to choose the Latine as a third Language indifferent as well to the Normans as Saxons and best understood of any forreine Tongue besides and yet endeavoured to bring both peoples into one Language as they were intended to be one people and to presse the use of the Norman Tongue in publique affaires so farre as might consist with good government and justice leaving
sounds as much as if the tenants were bound by their tenures to ayd their Lord in all cases of extraordinary charge saving that the Lord could not distraine his tenant for ayd to his warre and this according to the Lords discretion Ibid. for Glanvile Glanv l. 9. c. 8 saith that the law determined nothing concerning the quantity or valew of these ayds These were the Norman waies and savoured so much of Lordship that within that age they were regulated But that of reliefes was an ancient sacrifice as of first fruits of the tenement to the Lord in memoriall of the first Lords favour in conferring that tenement Ibid. and it was first setled in the Saxons time The Lords priviledge of power extended so farre as to distraine his tenants into his own Court to answer to himselfe in all causes that concerned his right and so the Lord became both Judge and party which was soon felt and prevented as shall appeare hereafter Another priviledge of the Lords power was over the tenants heire after the tenants death in the disposing of the body during the minority and marriage of the same As touching the disposing of the body the Lord either retained the same in his own power Glanv 7.10 or committed the same to others and this was done either pleno jure or rendring an account Ibid. c. 12. As concerning the marriage of the females that are heires or so apparent the parents in their life time cannot marry them without the Lords consent nor may they marry themselves after their parents death without the same and the Lords are bound to give their consent unlesse they can shew cause to the contrary The like also of the tenants widdows that have any dowry in the lands of such tenure And by such like means as these the power of the Barons grew to that height that in the lump it was too massie both for Prince and Commons 14. Of the power of the last Will. It is a received opinion that at the common law no man could devise his lands by his last will If thereby it be conceived to be against common reason I shall not touch that but if against custome of the ancient times I must suspend my concurrence therewith untill those ancient times be defined for as yet I finde no testimony sufficient to assert that opinion but rather that the times hitherto had a sacred opinion of the last will as of the most serious sincere and advised declaration of the most inward desires of a man which was the main thing looked unto in all conveyances Voluntas donatoris de cetero observetur And therefore nothing was more ordinary then for Kings in these times as much as in them did lie to dispose of their Crowns by their last Will. M. Paris An. 1216. Hoveden An. 1199. Malmsb. nov l. 1. Malmsb. l. 3. Thus King John appointed Henry the third his successor and Richard the first devised the Crown to King John and Henry the first gave all his lands to his daughter and William the Conquerour by his last will gave Normandy to Robert England to William and to Henry his mothers lands If then things of greatest moment under Heaven were ordinarily disposed by the last Will was it then probable that the smaller free holds should be of too high esteem to be credited to such conveyances I would not be mistaken as if I thought that Crowns and Empires were at the disposall of the last will of the possessour nor doe I thinke that either they were thus in this Kingdome or that there is any reason that can patronize that opinion yet it will be apparent that Kings had no sleight conceit of the last will and knew no such infirmity in that manner of conveyance as is pretended or else would they never have spent that little breath left them in vaine Glanvil l. 7. cap. 1 5. I have observed the words of Glanvile concerning this point and I cannot finde that he positively denieth all conveyance of land by Will but onely in case of disherison the ground whereof is because its contrary to the conveyance of the law and yet in that case also alloweth of a disposing power by consent of the heire which could never make good conveyance if the will in that case were absolutely voide and therefore his authority lies not in the way Nor doth the particular customes of places discountenance but rather advance this opinion for if devise of lands were incident to the tenure in Gavell kind and that so generall in old time as also to the burgage tenures Ll. Gulielm cap. 61. which were the rules of Corporation and Cities Vbi leges Angliae deperiri non possunt nec defraudari nec violari how can it be said contrary to the common law And therefore those conveyances of lands by last will that were in and after these times holden in use seem to me rather remnants of the more generall custome wasted by positive lawes then particular customes growing up against the common rule It s true that the Clergy put a power into the Pope to alter the law M. Paris An. 1181. Hoved An. 1181. Decret Alex. pap Hoveden fo 587. as touching themselves in some cases for Roger Archbishop of Yorke procured a faculty from the Pope to ordaine that no Ecclesiasticall persons Will should be good unlesse made in health and not lying in extremity and that in such cases the Archbishop should possesse himselfe of all such parties goods but as it lasted not long so was himselfe made a president in the case for being overtaken with death ere he was provided he made his will in his sicknesse and Henry the second possessed himselfe of his estate And it s as true that Femme coverts in these daies could make no will of their reasonable part Glanv l. 7. cap. 5 16. because by the Saxon law it belonged joyntly to the children Nor could usurers continuing in that course at the time of their death make their will because their personall estate belonged to the King after their death and their lands to their Lords by escheate although before death they lie open to no censure of law but this was by an especiall law made since the Conquerours time for by the Saxon law they were reputed as outlaws Neverthelesse all these doe but strengthen the generall rule Ll. Edw. 37. viz. that regularly the last will was holden in the generall a good conveyance in law If the will were onely intended and not perfected or no will was made then the lands passed by descent and the goods held course according to the Saxon law Glanv l. 7. c. 6. cap. 8. viz. the next kinsmen and friends of the intestate did administer and as administrators they might sue by Writ out of the Kings court although the Clergy had now obtained so much power as for the recovery of a legacy or for the determining
common law and Kings prerogative would agree thereto The complaints are of this natures 1. That the Church-possessions in their vacances are wasted and that Escheators doe not onely seise the personall estate of the Abbot or Prior deceased but such Corne in the barne and other goods belonging to the houses for their maintenance as also the profits of Churches impropriate 2. 3 4 5. Elections are either disturbed by the Kings Letters praeceding or by delay of the Royall assent subsequent the said elections 6. The Lay power without the advice of the Clergy doe put in eject or restore incumbents to Benefices voyd 7. Prelates are summoned to answer to the Lay power in the Writs Quare excommunicavit and Quare non admisit 8. Clerks are distrained in their Lay fees to answer before the Lay power in action of debts trespasse or other personall actions and in case they have no Lay fees the ordinary is distrained by his Barony to cause the Clerke to appeare 9. The Laity are forbidden to take oath or to inform upon oath before the Prelates and to obey Prelates commands in such cases 10. Persons taken and imprisoned upon excommunication are ordinarily dismist without satisfaction unto the Prelate and sometimes are not taken by the Sheriffe 11. 12. 33. 13. notwithstanding the Kings Writ and as well the King as his Officers doe ordinarily communicate with such as are excommunicated and likewise command others to communicate with them 14. Clerks imprisoned for felony are refused to be delivered to the Ordinary unlesse upon security to appeare before the Justices in Oyer 15. and sometimes are hanged before their Ordinary can demand them and sometimes their heads are all shaven that they may not appeare to be Clerks 16. Justices itinerant doe imprison Clerks defamed for felony or otherwise outlaw them if they doe not appeare And otherwise proceed against Clerks after their purgation before the ordinary 17. 18. The Lay power seises upon the estates of Clerks degraded for crimes 19. Clergy are compelled to answer and give satisfaction for offences against the forrest laws 20. before the Lay power And in case of default the Bishop by distresse is compelled to order satisfaction 21. as well in such cases as in person all actions 22. Priviledges of Sanctuary are invaded by force 23. Executors of Bishops are hindred from administring the estate without licence first obtained from the King 24. The Kings tenants goods are seised after their decease by the Kings Bailiffs 25. Intestates goods are seised by their Lords and their Ordinary hindred from administration 26. The Kings prohibition passeth in case of Tythes and Chappels 27. The like in cases of troth-plight perjury cerage heriet or other Church duties as money for reparations of Churches and fences in Churchyards 28. pecuniary punishment for Adultery 40. 29. and costs of suit in Ecclesiasticall court sacriledge excommunication for breach of the liberties of the Church contrary to the grand Charter 30. In cases of prohibition if the Ecclesiasticall Judge proceed contrary to the same he is attached and compelled to shew his acts in Court if the Lay Judge determine the cause to be temporall the Ecclesiasticall Judge is amerced if he proceed against the prohibition and it s tried by witnesses of two ribaulds and in case it be found for the Ecclesiasticall Judges cognisance 31. yet there is no costs allowed for such vexation 32. That Jewes in matters Ecclesiasticall aforesaid are by the Kings prohibition drawn from the Ecclesiasticall Judge unto the Lay Magistrate 34. Question about Lands given in Frankalmoine are tried in the Lay courts 35. 36. 37. 38. and by reason of such tenure the owners though Clergy men are compelled to doe suite at the Lay courts and are charged with impositions and are distrained hereunto although the Lord have other Land of the Donor in Frankallmoine subject to his distresse 39. Prelates summoned to higher Courts are not allowed to make atturnies to appeare for them in the inferior civill courts 41. Grantees of murage or other unwonted impositions compell the Churchmen to pay the same 42 43. The Clergy are charged with Quarter Cart-service and purveying 44. The chancery sendeth out new Writs contrary to the liberties of the Church and the law of the Land without the assent of the Councell of the kingdome Princes and Prelates 45. The King doth compell the Clergy to benevolences to the King at his voyage into forraine parts 46. Amercements granted to Clergy men are turned into fines by the Justices and by them taken 47. Clergy men are fined for want of appearance before the Justices itinerant and of the Forest upon common summons 48. Quo warrantoes granted against the Clergy for their liberties and the same seised unlesse they be set down in expresse words in their Charter 49. 50. notwithstanding that by long custome they have enjoyed the same and many times contrary to expresse grant This is the summe of their paper of grievances and because they found the King either wilfull or unconstant they resolve upon a remedy of their own by excommunication and interdiction not sparing the persons of any principall or accessory nor their Lands no not of the King himselfe and for this they joyn all as one man Now what scare this made I know not but Henry the third in the Stat. of Marlb and Edward the first in his Stat. at Westminster and other Satatutes the first spake faire and seemed to redresse some of these complaints as also did Edward the second and yet the Common law lost little ground thereby That which Henry the third did besides his promises of reforming was done in the Stat. of Marlbridge The successors of Abbats Priors and Prelates Marlbr c. 29. c. shall have an action of trespasse for trespasses done nigh before the death of their predecessors upon the estates of their Corporations And shall prosecute an action begun by their Predecessors And also shall have an assize against intruders into any of the possessions belonging to the said Corporations whereof their predecessors died seised This might seem a remedy provided against the first malady complained of and questionlesse bound all but the King and so might perchance abate somewhat the edge of that Article But it being the Clergies reach to grow rich and the Popes cunning to help on that worke that they might be as stores for supply of his treasury and had forbidden Abbats and other Prelates c. the liberty of disposing their estates by last Will. Kings therefore as supreame patrons to these bodies in their vacances used to seise all the estates of the Prelates with the temporalties to their own use as well to preserve the riches of the kingdome to it selfe and the possessions of such Corporations from spoile as to be a cloke of their own covetousnesse And under the estates of the Prelates or heads of these Corporations all the
passe before the party was indicted Stat. de asport relig 35 E. 1. No religious House shall be charged with taxe to any superiour without the Realm of England nor shall send to any visitation out of England This was neither at the request of the Clergy nor act of kindnesse intended unto them but for the good of the Kingdome to prevent the bleeding of the treasure of the Kingdome into forraine parts Mag. carta cap. 35. Patrons of Abbies shall have their custody during their vacancies This was the ancient Law now revived by the Clergies consent and intended for the safegard of the Revenues of the Houses and their maintenance and therefore it s with a sicut superius dictum est cap. 5. Stat. de prisis Edw. 2. The goods of the Clergy freed from purveyance unlesse they will It was a favour given by Edw. 2. to the Clergy to gaine their good will after the death of Gaveston the shamefull defeat received in Scotland and some particular testimonies of Gods displeasure whereof he began to be somewhat sensible Stat. de quo Warranto 18 Edw. 1. Franchises holden by prescription or charter confirmed and trials by Quo warranto allowed to be in eyer It was the common share of the great men but especially of the Clergy to have their franchises exposed to the prey of the Eagles or to such as hauked for them and its likely the King had not so easily forgone his prise if all the fat had faln to his own share but perceiving that more benefit came to his instruments then was meet and himselfe little the better thereby he sacrificed his Judges to the people but it was to his own behoofe and so gained both credit and favour from the people and profit to himselfe and in some measure satisfied the 48 49 50. Articles of the Clergies complaint in the time of Henry the third and the 15th Article of their last complaint Lands or Tenements aliened to a Religious house shall escheate to the Lord Mag. carta cap. 37. if the alienor take the same backe to hold of that house The ground hereof principally was the prejudice done to the Lord by destruction of the tenure albeit that it had been an ancient grievance complained of in the Saxon times that the Clergy were covetous and swallowed down estates and thereby weakned the Kingdome But now they are become even cheaters serving the turnes of treacherous tenants that would give their Lands by compact with the Church men to receive them againe from them to hold of the Church which was a liberty that men thirsted after in those times wherein the Church men were more adored then their Images Bracton lib. 1. fo 13. Coke 2. instit super Magna carta cap. 36. p. 74 75. Bracton lib. 2. cap. 10. fo 27. It seems this Law was made after Bractons time if that be true in the second institutes for he saith that a man may give his lands to any one whether Christian or Jew or religious person and nothing shall hinder it but the speciall reservation of the donor and yet he saith that such gift or grant taketh not away the right of the Lord Paramount in his tenure albeit the gift be in free almes Neverthelesse it seemeth to be such restraint as the Templers and Hospitallers were faine to find out a new way which was to protect mens tenements from execution of law by levying crosses thereon albeit the right of the Lords was not barred and therefore Edw. 1. Stat. West 2. cap. 33. provided a law to make this also in nature of a Mortmaine within the Statute made in the seventh yeere of his reigne called the Statute de Religiosis by which it was enacted that in case of such alienations in Mortmaine the Lord should have liberty to enter if he failed then the Lord paramont Stat. de Religiosis 7 E. 1. or if he failed the King should enter and dispose of the same and that no licence of Mortmaine should be sued out but by the mean Lords assent and where part of the premises remaine still in the Donor and the originall Writ mentioneth all the particulars And thus at length was this issue for the present staied which hitherto wasted the strength of the Kingdom Stat. de Amortizandis terris M. West An. 1280. Mag. carta cap. 39. and by continuall current emptying it into the mare mortuum of the Clergy consumed the maintenance of Knight service by converting the same to Clerk-service No Iudge shall compell a free man to make othe without the Kings command Miror Just cap. 5. sec 3. So is the sence of the law rendred by an ancient authour and I hope I shall not wrong the Text if I affirme that the Ecclesiasticall Judge was included within the equity though properly he be not Balivus for the Law intends to shew that its a liberty that the subject hath not to be compelled to take oath without the Kings especiall command and by consequence it sheweth also that the King at that time and untill then had the directory of oathes for it was an ancient liberty given in the Kings charters unto such as they pleased viz. to impose oathes Malimsb de gest Reg. lib. 2. and to punish for breach of oath and this passed under the word Athae or Athas and so Edmund the Saxon King gave to the Abby of Glastenbury amongst other Athas Ordulas and the Churchmen that first procured vacations from suits of law during holy times procured a law also to be setled by Edward the Saxon King and Gunthurne the Dane Ll. Edw. cap. 9. that Ordeale and oathes should be forbidden upon the holy Feasts and lawfull fasts And a wonder it is how it escaped the gripe of the Clergy so long who catched at any thing that had but a glance of Gods worship in it And if this were the subjects liberty not to be compelled to sweare surely much more not to be compelled to accuse himselfe unlesse by the law he be especially bound Bracton lib. 3. cap. 7 fo 106. for it is Glanviles rule Ob infamiam non solet juxta legem terrae aliquis per legem apparentem se purgare nisi prius convictus fuerit vel confessus in curiae But the power of the Clergy now was grown strong and they begin to remember themselves and that oathes are of a holy regard and they men for holinesse best able to judge when and to whom they shall be ministred and therefore now they begin to enter their claime and to make a sure title they get a grant from Pope Innocent to Steven Langton Archbishop of Canterbury of a faculty of licencing administration of oathes during the time of Lent and he accordingly enjoyed it during the mad time of Henry the third But Edward the first quarrelled it and left it questionable to Edward the second who being in his condition as a
Charter and other Statutes during the reignes of these Kings SHattered asunder by broiles of Civill wars the free men having laid aside that regard of the ancient mutuall covenant and bond of Decenners are now become weake and almost inthralled to the lust of Kings Lords Pope and English Clergy and therefore it s no wonder if taxes and tributes were many and new although most of them deserved not to march under any banner but the colours of oppression nor did any thing save them from the worst tenure of all but the severall interests of those superiour powers which oftentimes did justle with one another and thereby gave the Commons liberty to take breath so as though for the present they lost ground and hunted upon a coole sent yet they still retained the prey within their view Sometimes they were cast farre behind other times they recovered themselves a truce is cried and laws are made to moderate all and determine the bounds of every one and thus comes the grand Charter into the Publique Theater The Historian saith it was the same with that of King Johns framing and yet by comparing them together we finde them disagreeing both in words and sence and therefore shall sum the same up as shortly as I can observing the difference of the two Charters as I passe along The first Chapter concerned the Church of which sufficient hath been spoken Mag. carta The Free men shall enjoy these liberties to them and their heires for ever cap. 2. The heire in Knightservice shall pay the ancient reliefe cap. 3. That reliefes were setled by the Saxons hath been already shewed and also that they were continued and confirmed by Henry the first onely in those times they were payed in Horses Armes c. but in after times all was turned into money which was more beneficiall for all cap. 4. Vide Stat. de Wardis 28 E. 1 Lords shall have their Wards bodies and Lands after homage received untill the full age though the Ward be formerly Knighted Glanvil lib 6. cap. 1. 4. The Law of Wardship may seem more anciently seated in this Kingdome then the Normans times for if the Statutes of Scotland beare any credit that Law was in Scotland before those times The Lords were not to have the Wardship before they were possessed of the tenure because it was theirs as a fruit of the tenure according to the Saxon law concerning distresse that it could not be in the power of the Lord to distraine till he was possessed of the service Stat. Marlbr cap. 6 7. And if by fraudulent conveyance the heire did hold the Lord out of possession a Writ of Ward did lie against him and if he did not appeare the Lord might seise the Lands unlesse in case of Wardship per cause de guard Stat. Marlbr cap. 16. prerog Reg. cap. 3. And in case the Lord would hold the Wardship longer then the full age of the heire an Assize did lie against the Lord for the heire could not enter without livery But if the heire were of full age at the time of the ancestors death the Lord could not enter the Lands and yet he should have a reliefe and the primer seisin And if the heire entered the Lands before homage done he gained no free hold Prerog Reg. cap. 13. though he were Knighted before as this Law provideth for it may seem that these times of civill warre brought forth a tricke of Knighting betimes as an honourable encouragement for young sparks to enter the field before they were compleat men of discretion to know whether the cause of warre was good or evill and yet reason might induce a conceit that he that was thought meet to doe Knight service in his own person might expect the maintenance fit for the ability of the person and honour of the service Grantees or their assignes or Committees of Wardships shall preserve the Land c. from waste cap. 5. and the tenants from extortion They shall yeeld up the same stocked if they receive them stocked cap. 6. The first of these is the law of common reason for its contrary to guardianship to destroy that which by their office they ought to preserve As touching the words of the Law the Grantees are omitted in the Charter of King John and also their assignees albeit that doubtlesse they were within the intent and meaning of the Law The matter declares plainly not onely the oppession of Lords upon their Wards but also the corruption even of the law it selfe that at the first aimed at the good of the publique and honour of Knightservice but now was degenerated into the base desire of profit by making market of the Wards estates and marriages that brought in strip and wast of Estates and niggardly neglect of the education and training up of the persons of the Wards and an imbasing of the generation of mankind and spoile of times Nor did these times ever espie or provide against the worst of these but onely endeavoured to save the estate by punishing the wasters in dammages by this law and by forfaiture of the Wardship by a Law made in the time of Edward the first Stat. Gloc. cap. 5. and this as well for waste done during the time of the custody as in the life time of his ancestors by another law in Edward the firsts time Stat. de vasto 20 E. 1. And because the Escheators and their under Officers used to serve themselves out of the estates of minors before they certified to the King his right and those were not within the Law of Magna Carta or at least not so reputed Artic. sup cart cap. 18. It was therefore afterwards provided that these also should render dammages in a Writ of wast to be brought against them The marriage of Wards shall be without disparagement cap. 7. It was an ancient law amongst the Germans and the Saxons brought it hither Tacitus mor. Germ. and as a Law setled it that marriage must be amongst equals but the Danes and Normans sleighted it and yet it continued and was revived Now as the Lord had the tuition of the Ward instead of the ancester so had he the care of the marriage in such manner as the ancester might have had if he had lived For in case the Ward were stolne and married the delinquent suffered fine and imprisonment Or if the ward married without the Lords consent he shall have the double value S at Merton cap. 6. and hold the land over till satisfaction But in case the Lord marrieth the Ward within fourteene yeeres of age to its disparagement cap. 7. he shall lose his Wardship thereby And if the Ward refuseth to accept of a marriage tendred by the Lord before her age of 16 yeeres West 1. c. 22. the Lord shall hold the Lands till he have received the full valew and in case where one tenant holdeth of
sold delayed or denied It s a comprehensive law and made up of many Saxon laws or rather an inforcement of all laws and a remedy against oppression past present and to come and concerneth first the person then his livelihood as touching the person his life and his liberty his life shall be under the protection of the law and his liberty likewise so as he shall be shut into no place by imprisonment nor out of any place by banishment but shall have liberty of ingresse and egresse His estate both reall and personall shall also be under the protection of the Law and the law also shall be free neither denied nor delayed I thinke it needlesse to shew how this was no new law but a confirmation of the old and reparation added thereto being much impaired by stormy times for the summe of all the foregoing discourse tendeth thereto cap. 32. Merchants shall have free and safe passage and trade without unjust taxes as by ancient custome they ought In time of warre such as are of the enemies Countries shall be secured till it appeare how the English Merchants are used in their Countries That this was an ancient law the words thereof shew besides what may be observed out of the Laws of Aetheldred and other Saxon laws So as it appeareth that not onely the English free men and natives had their liberties asserted by the law but also forrainers if Merchants had the like liberties for their persons and goods concerning trade and maintenance of the same and were hereby enabled to enjoy their own under the protection of the law as the free men had And unto this law the charter of King John added this ensuing It shall be lawfull for every free man to passe freely to and from this Kingdome saving fealty to the King unlesse in time of warre and then also for a short space as may be for the common good excepting prisoners outlaws and those Countrey-men that are in enmity and Merchants who shall be dealt with as aforesaid And it seemeth that this law of free passage out of the Kingdome was not anciently fundamentall but onely grounded upon reason of State although the free men have liberty of free passage within the Kingdome according to that originall law sit pax publica per communes vias and for that cause as I suppose it was wholly omitted in the Charter of Henry the third as was also another law concerning the Jewes which because it left an influence behind it after the Jewes were extinct in this Nation and which continueth even unto this day I shall incert it in this short summe After death of the Jewes debtor no usury shall be payd during the minority of the heire though the debt shall come into the Kings hand And the debt shall be payd saving to the wife her dower and maintenance for the children according to the quantity of the debtors Land and saving the Lords service and in like manner of debts to others The whole doctrine of usury fell under the title of Jewes for it seemeth it was their trade and their proper trade hitherto Concil Brit. 299. It was first that I met with forbidden at a Legatine Councell nigh 300 yeeres before the Normans times but by the Confessors law it was made penall to Christians to the forfeiture of estate and banishing and therefore the Jewes and all their substance were holden to be in nature of the Kings villeines as touching their estate Ibid. 623. Glanvil lib. 7. cap. 16. for they could get nothing but was at his mercy and Kings did suffer them to continue this trade for their own benefit yet they did regulate it as touching infants as by this law of King John and the Statute at Merton doth appeare M. Paris An. 1229. Merton cap. 5. Stat. de Judais An 18 E. 1. but Henry the third did not put it into his Charter as I thinke because it was no liberty of the subjects but rather a prejudice thereto and therefore Edward the first wholly tooke it away by a Statute made in his time and thereby abolished the Jewes Tenants Lands holden of Lands escheated to the King shall hold by the same services as formerly cap. 33. cap. 34. In all alienations of Lands sufficient shall be left for the Lords distresse Prerog Reg. cap. 7. Submitting to the judgement of the learned I conceive that as well in the Saxon times as untill this law any tenant might alien onely part of his lands and reserve the services to the alienor because he could not reserve service upon such alienation unto the Lord paramount other then was formerly due to him without the Lords consent and for the same reason could they not alien the whole tenancy to binde the Lord without his expresse licence saving the opinion in the booke of Assizes 20 ass pl. 17. because no tenant could be inforced upon any Lord least he might be his enemy Neverthelesse it seemeth that de facto tenants did usually alien their whole tenancy and although they could not thereby barre the Lords right yet because the Lord could not in such case have the distresse of his own tenant this law saved so much from alienation as might serve for security of the Lords distresse But tenants were not thus satisfied the Lords would not part with their tenants although the tenants necessity was never so urgent upon them to sell their Lands and therefore at length they prevailed by the Statute of Quia emptores to have power to sell all 18 Edw. 1. Westm 3. ca. 1. saving to the Lords their services formerly due and thus the Lords were necessitated to grant licences of alienation to such as the tenants could provide to buy their lands Nor was this so prejudiciall to the Lords in those daies when the publique quiet was setled as it would have been in former times of warre when as the Lords right was maintained more by might and the ayd of his tenants then by law which then was of little power cap. 35. The 35 Chapter I have formerly mentioned in the Chapter concerning the Clergy cap. 36. No man shall be appealed by a woman for the death of any but her own husband The right of appeale is grounded upon the greatest interest Now because the wives interest seemeth wholy to be swallowed up in her husband therefore she shall have an appeale of the death of him onely and such also was the Law in Glanvils time How far this point of interest shall extend to the degrees of consanguinity the Norman Law formerly hath shewen And against whom appeales did lie the Statute at Westminster tels us viz. not onely against the principall West 1. cap. 14 but also against accessories yet not against them till the principall be attainted And because it was ordinary for men of nought to appeale others in a malicious way Westm 2. ca. 13 it was by another law established
King and complained of that summons as of a common grievance be cause that neither they nor their ancestors were bound to serve the King in that Countrey and they obtained the Kings discharge under his broad Seale accordingly The like whereunto may be warranted out of the very words of the Statute of Mortmaine Stat. Mortm 7 Edw. 1. which was made within the compasse of these times by which it was provided that in case Lands be aliened contrary to that Statute and the immediate Lords doe not seise the same the King shall seise them and dispose them for the defence of the Kinodome viz. upon such services reserved as shall suite therewith as if all the service of a Knight must conduce thereto and that he is no further bound to any service of his Lord then will consist with the safety of the Kingdome This was the doctrine that the sad experience of the later government of Kings in these times had taught the Knighthood of England to hold for the future ages Stat. de Militibus No tenant in ancient demesnes or in Burgage shall be distraimed for the service of a Knight Clerks and tenants in Socage of other Manors then of the King shall be used as they have been formerly Tenants in ancient Demesne and tenants in Burgage are absolutely acquitted from forraine service the one because they are in nature of the Kings husbandmen and served him and his family with victuall the other because by their tenure they were bound to the defence of their burrough which in account is a limbe or member of the Kingdome and so in nature of a Castle guard Now as touching Clerks and tenants in Socage holding of a subject they are left to the order of ancient use appearing upon record As concerning the Clergy its evident by what hath been formerly noted that though they were importunate to be discharged of the service military in regard that their profession was for peace and not for blood yet could never obtaine their desire for though their persons might challenge exemption from that worke yet their Lands were bound to finde armes by their deputies for otherwise it had been unreasonable that so great a part of the Kingdome as the Clergy then had should sit still and looke on whiles by the law of nature every one is engaged in his own defence Nor yet did the profession of these men to be men for peace hold alwaies uniforme some kind of warres then were holden sacred and wherein they not onely adventured their estates but even their own persons and these not onely in defensive way but by way of invasion and many times where no need was for them to appeare Tenants in Socage also in regard of their service might plead exemption from the warres For if not the plough must stand still and the land thereby become poore and lean Neverthelesse a generall service of defence of the Kingdome is imposed upon all and husbandmen must be souldiers when the debate is who shall have the Land in such cases therefore they are evocati ad arma to maintaine and defend the Kingdome but not compelable to forraine service as the Knights were whose service consisted much in defence of their Lords person in reference to the defence of the Kingdome and many times policy of warre drew the Lords into Armes abroad to keepe the enemy further from their borders and the Knights then under their Lords pay went along with them and therefore the service of Knighthood is commonly called servitium forinsecum Of these Socagers did arise not onely the body of English Footmen in their Armies Concil Brit. 406. but the better and more wealthy sort of them found armes of a Knight as formerly hath been observed yet alwaies under the pay of the common purse and if called out of the Kingdome they were meere voluntiers for they were not called out by distresse as Knights were because they held not their Land by such service but they were summoned by Proclamation and probably were mustered by the high Constables in each Hundred the Law neverthelesse remaining still intire that all must be done not onely ad fidem Domini Regis but also Regni which was disputed and concluded by the Sword for though Kings pretended danger to the publique often times to raise the people yet the people would give credit as they pleased or if the Kings title were in question or the peoples liberty yet every man tooke liberty to side with that party that liked him best nor did the Kings proclamation sway much this or that way It s true that presidents of those times cry up the Kings power of arraying all ships and men without respect unlesse of age or corporall disability but it will appeare that no such array was but in time of no lesse known danger from abroad to the Kingdome then imminent and therefore might be wrought more from the generall feare of the enemy then from the Kings command and yet those times were alwaies armed in neighbouring Nations and Kings might have pretended continuall cause of arraying Secondly it will no lesse clearly appeare that Kings used no such course but in case of generall danger to the whole Kingdome either from forraine invasion as in the times of King John or from intestine broiles 21 E. 1. rot 81. as in the times of Henry the third and the two Edwards successively and if the danger threatned onely one coast the array was limited onely to the parts adjacent thereunto Thirdly it seemeth that generall arrayes were not levied by distresse till the time of Edward the first 23 E. 1. Memb. 5. and then onely for the rendezvouz at the next Sea coast and for defence against forraine invasion in which case all subjects of the Kingdome are concerned by generall service otherwise it can come unto no other account then that title prerogative and therein be charactered as a tricke above the ordinary straine Fourthly those times brought forth no generall array of all persons between the ages of sixteen yeeres and sixty that was made by distresse in any case of civill warre but onely by Sheriffs Summons and in case of disobedience by summons to appeare before the King and his Councell which sheweth that by the common law they were not compelable or punishable Lastly though these arraies of men were sometimes at the charge of the King and sometimes at the subjects own charge yet that last was out of the rode way of the Subjects liberty as the subsequent times doe fully manifest And the like may be said of arraies of ships which however under command of Kings for publique service were neverthelesse rigged and payed out of the publique charge The summe of all will be that in cases of defence from forraine invasion Kings had power of array according to the order of Law if they exceeded that rule it may be more rightly said they did what they would then what they ought
which not onely the people but also the King must submit The like whereunto Ina the great Saxon King also Ll. Inae Lamb. No great man saith he nor any other in the whole Kingdome may abolish the written Laws Kings furthermore bound themselves at their entrance into the Throne hereunto by an oath as it s noted of Canutus unto whom after Aetheldred was dead the Bishops Abbats Dukes Miror cap. 1. sect 2. and other Nobles came and elected him to be their King and sware fealty unto him and he againe sware to them that Secundum Deum secundum seculum c. viz. according to the Lawes of God and of the Nation he would be a faithfull Lord to them Wigortn An. 1016. It s probable I grant that the praecipuum Sacramentum formerly mentioned was in the first nature more personall for the defence of the person of their leader whiles he was their Captain because it much concerned the good of the Army and without whom all must scatter and bring all to ruine and this the words of the Historian doe evidence But the safety of the whole people depended not on him after the warre was done and therefore the oath tied them not any further nor did the safety of the people afterwards when as the Saxons entred this Land so absolutely rest upon the person of the King especially if he proved unfit to mannage the worke and therefore the fealty that the people sware to their King was not so absolutely determined upon their persons otherwise then in order to the publique weale as may appeare from the Lawes of the Confessor who was within thirty yeeres after the reigne of Aethelstan formerly mentioned The words in English run thus All the people in their Folkmote shall confederate themselves as sworn bretheren to defend the Kingdome against strangers and enemies together with their Lord the King and to preserve his Lands and Honours together with him with all faithfulnesse and that within and without the Kingdom of Britaine they will be faithfull to him as to their Lord and King So as t is evident the Saxons fealty to their King was subservient to the publique safty and the publique safety is necessarily dependant upon the liberty of the Lawes Nor was it to be expected that the Saxons would endure a King above this pitch For those parts of Germany whence they came that had the Regiment of Kings which these had not yet used they their Kings in no other manner then as servants of State in sending them as Embassadours and Captaines Tacitus as if they claimed more interest in him then he in them and the Historian saith expresly that amongst those people in Germany that had Kings their Kings had a defined power and were not supra libertatem And this maxime of State became afterwards priviledged by Sanctuary for by the growth of Antichrist not only the Clergy but even their tenants and retainers were exempt from reach of Kings even by their own concession allowed of a Law that cut the throat of their indefined prerogative Ll. Sax. Ed. cap. 17. viz. That if the King defend not his people and especially Church-men from injury nec nomen Regis in eo constabit verum nomen Regis perdit Which Law however it might passe for currant Divinity in those daies yet its strange it should get into a publique act of State Nor was this a dead word M. Westm An. 756 758. Wigorn. An. 755. for the people had formerly a tricke of deposing their Kings when they saw him peep above the ordinary reach and this was an easie work for them to doe where ever neighbouring Princes of their own Nation watched for the windfals of Crowns This made the Monarchicall Crown in this Land to walke circuit into all parts of the Countrey to finde heads fit to weare it selfe untill the Norman times Thirdly the Saxons had so hammered their Kings in their elections and made him so properly their own as they claimed an interest not onely in the person of their Kings but also in their estates so as in some respects they were scarcely sui juris For King Baldred had given the Mannor of Malings in Sussex to Christchurch in Canterbury and because the Lords consented not thereto Concil Brit. 340. it was revoked and King Egbert afterwards made a new grant by advice of the Lords which shewes that the Demesnes of the Crown were holden sacred and not to be disposed of to any other use though pious without the consent of the Lords and herewith concurre all the Saxon infeodations attested and confirmed by Bishops Abbots Dukes and others of the Nobility under their severall hands Neverthelesse Kings were not then like unto plumed Eagles exposed to the charity of the Foules for food but had a royall maintenance suitable to their Majesty their power was double one as a Captaine other as a King the first was first and made way for the second as Captaine their power was to lead the army punish according to demerits and according to laws and reward according to discretion As Captaine they had by ancient custome the whole spoile left to their ordering by permission of the army Tacitus Exigunt Principis liberalitate illum Bellatorem equum illam cruentam victricem frameam and they were not wont in such cases to be close handed per bella raptus munificentiae materia the spoiles in these wasted parts of Germany bring little other then horses and armes But after they came into Britaine the change of soile made them more fat Horses and Armes were turned into Towns Houses Lands and Cattell and these were distributed as spoils amongst the Saxon souldiers by their Generals and this redounded to the maintenance of the State and port of the great men who were wont to be honoured non stipendiis sed muneribus Tacitus and the people used ultro viritum conferre principibus vel armentorum vel frugum aliquid but now upon the distribution of conquered Towns Houses Lands and Cattell in Britaine a yeerly product of victuals or other service was reserved and allowed to the Saxon kings by the people as the people allowed to Joshua his Land Jos 19.49 so as they needed no longer the former course of Offerings but had enough to maintaine their Royall port and great superfluity of Demesnes besides as their charity to the Church men does sufficiently evidence and by this meanes all the Lands in England became mediately or immediately holden of the Crown and a setled maintenance annexed to the same besides the casuall profits upon emergencies or perquisites of fellons or fugitives goods mines of Gold and Silver treasure trove mulcts for offences Miror 101 298 Ll. Edw. cap. 14 and other priviledges which being originally in the kings were by them granted and made Royalties in the hands of subjects as at this day To the increase of Majesty and maintenance there was an
him over For though he might seem as it were in the heat of the chase to be drawn to London where the Crown was and that he rather sought after his enemies then it yet as soon as he perceived the Crown in his power he disputed not the right although that was Edgars but possessed himselfe of the long desired prey and yet he did it in a mannerly way as if he saw in it somewhat more then Gold and precious stones for though he might have taken it by ravishment yet he chose the way of wooing by a kind of mutuall agreement Thus this mighty Conquerour suffered himselfe to be conquered and stooping under the law of a Saxon King he became a King by leave wisely foreseeing that a title gotten by election is more certaine then that which is gotten by power CHAP. XLV That the title of the Norman Kings to the English Crown was by election SOme there are that build their opinion upon passionate notes of angry writers and doe conclude that the Dukes way and title was wholy by conquest and thence inferre strange aphorismes of state destructive to the government of this Kingdome Let the Reader please to peruse the ensuing particulars and thence conclude as he shall see cause It will easily be granted that the title of conquest was never further then the Kings thoughts if it ever entered therein else wherefore did he pretend other titles to the world But because it may be thought that his wisdome would not suffer him to pretend what he intended and yet in practice intended not at what he did pretend it will be the skill of the Reader to consider the manner of the first William's Coronation and his succeeding government His Coronation questionlesse was the same with that of the Ancient Saxon Kings for he was crowned in the Abbey of Westminster by the Archbishop of Yorke because he of Canterbury was not Canonicall At his Coronation he made a solemne covenant to observe those Laws which were bonae approbatae antique leges Regni Hoveden Eadmer Hist l. 1. p. 13. M. Paris vit Gulielm Malmsb l. 3. fo 154. Wigorn. An. 1066. Glossar Ll. Gul. Spicil 190. to defend the Church and Church men to govern all the people justly to make and maintaine righteous Laws and to inhibit all spoile and unjust judgements The people also entred into Covenant with him That as well within the Land as without they would be faithfull to their Lord King William and in every place to keepe with all fidelity his Lands and Honours together with him and against enemies and strangers to defend It is the selfesame in substance with the fealty that the Saxons made to their Kings as will appeare by the paralelling them both together The Saxons were sworn to defend the Kingdome against strangers and enemies together with their Lord the King and to preserve his Lands and Honours together with him with all faithfulnesse so as by the Saxon way the allegiance first terminated on the Kingdome and then as in order thereunto upon the King with his Lands and honours but the Norman either wholly omitted the first as needlesse to be inserted in a municipall Law it selfe being a Law in nature or else includeth all within the words Lands and Honours taking the same in a comprehensive sence for the whole Kindome and so made up the summe of the Saxon fealty in fewer figures Which may seem the more probable of the twaine because little reason can be rendred why the King should restraine that defence to his private lands if he claimed all by conquest when as all equally concerned him or why he should exclude the publique when as both himselfe and all he had was imbarked therein and it might subsist without him but contrarily not he without it appeareth not to my understanding nor did the thing enter into the Kings purpose if the file of his purposes be rightly considered For speaking concerning Castles Burroughs and Cities which are in nature of limmes of the Common-weale he saith that they were built for the defence of the people and Kingdome was this the service of walls and fortifications Ll. Gul. Spicil 61. and not much rather of men within those places of strength Certainly the plain English is that in time of breach of publique quiet and peace the subiects were bound to defend the Kingdome and in order thereto the people of the same and of the Kings right included in the publique defence else it were a strange conclusion that each man in particular and in their own person alone was bound to defend the Kings right but being imbodied the Kingdome And yet more clearly its apparent in that the service of the order of Knighthood which was the chiefe strength of the Nation in those daies was determined upon the service of the King M. Paris An. 1100 1213. and defence of the Kingdome or which is more plain for the service of the King in or for defence of the Kingdome as the statute of Mortmaine expounds the same Stat. 7. E. 1. But not to force the Kings sence by argument if the King had purposely omitted that clause of the Kingdomes safety as of inferiour regard to his own personall interest it was one of his rashest digressions wherein he soon espied his errour for in the middest of his strong and conquering army he held himselfe unassured unlesse he had a better foundation then that which must change with the lives of a few at the utmost And therefore besides the oath of fealty formerly mentioned he established a law of association that all free men should be sworn brethren Ll. Gulielm Spicil 59. 1. To defend the Kingdom with their lives and fortunes against all enemies to the utmost of their power 2. To keepe the peace and dignities of the Crown 3. To maintaine right and justice by all means without deceipt and delay Joyn then these two oathes together viz. that of fealty and this of fraternity and it will easily appeare that the allegiance of the English to the Norman Kings was no other then what might stand with brotherhood and tender regard of the publique above all and differing from the Saxon fealty onely in this that that was in one oath this in two Wherefore whatsoever respects steered in the reare of the Kings course it s lesse materiall so long as the vanne was right albeit that the sequell will prove not much different from the premises as will appeare in the foot of the whole account Thus entered the first Norman upon the Saxon Throne and as he had some colour of right to countenance his course William Rufus so had his sonne his fathers last will and yet he had as little right as he This was William Rufus that was of his fathers way but of a deeper die and therefore might well be called William Rufus or William in grain He was exceeding happy in the feare or favour of the
conceived to be for the publique benefit viz. either for the preparation or maintenance of publique warre for in such cases it hath been in all times held unreasonable that those whose persons are imployed to serve in the warres should hold lands doubly charged to the same service viz. to the defraying of their own private expences in the warre and maintenance of the publique charge of the same war besides CHAP. LIII Of divers Lawes made concerning the execution of justice ALthough in proceedings in cases of vindicative justice delinquents might seem to be left rather to the fury then mercy of the law yet so long as men are under the law and not without the law it hath been alwaies held a part of justice to extend what moderation might possibly stand with the honour of the law and that otherwise an over rigid and fierce prosecution of the guilty is no lesse tyranny then the persecution of the not guilty and although violence was the proper vice of these times yet this point of honour must be given to the Normans that their Sword had eyes and moved not altogether by rage but by reason No sentence shall passe but upon averment of the complaint by accuser or witnesses produced Ll. Hen. 1. c. 5. Fine and pledges shall be according to the quantity of the offence Ll. Hen. 1. M. Paris By these two laws of Henry the first the subjects were delivered from three great oppressions first in making them offenders without complaint or witnesse Secondly in imposing immoderate fines Lastly in urging extraordinary baile Forfeiture of fellons Lands is reduced to a yeere and a day Miror fo 261 The Normans had reduced the Saxon law in this case unto their own last which stretched their desire as farre as the estate would beare but this being so prejudiciall to the immediate Lords who were no offenders in this case and so contrary to the Saxon law it was both done and undone in a short space by the allowance of Henry the first Intent of criminall offences manifested by act punished by fine or mulct This by Alfreds law was punished by Talioes law Miror fo 254. but now by a law of Henry the first reduced to mulcts Mainperners are not to be punished as principals unlesse they be parties or privies to the failing of the principall This law of Henry the first repealed the former law of Canutus which must be acknowledged to be rigorous Miror fo 141. although not altogether without reason No person shall be imprisoned for committing of mortall crime unlesse first he be attainted by verdict of twelve men Ll. Hen. 1. c. 5. By imprisonment is intended close imprisonment or imprisonment without baile or mainprise for otherwise its apparent that as well by the Saxon as Norman laws men were brought to triall by restraint Appeales of murder restrained within the fourth degree Before this law Appeales were brought by any of the blood or kinne of the party slaine Miror cap. 2. Sec. 7. but now by Henry the first restrained The ground seems to be for that affection that runnes with the blood grows so cold beyond the fourth degree that the death of the party is of so small account as can it scarcely be reputed a losse of such consequence to the party as to expose the life or price of the life of the manslayer unto the claime of such an one and thus the Saxon law that gave the satisfaction in such case to the whole kindred became limited to the fourth degree as I conceive from the Ecclesiastical constitution concerning marriage Two things more concerning juridicall proceedings may be noted the one concerning speedy course of justice wherein they may seem to justifie the Saxon way but could never attaine to their pace in regard they yeelded so much time to Summons Essoines c. The other concernes election of Judges by the parties for this we finde in the lawes of Henry the first CHAP. LIV. Of the Militia during the Normans time THe power of Militia is either the legislative or executory power the legislative power without contradiction rested in the grand Councell of the Kingdome to whom it belonged to establish laws for the government of the kingdome in time of peace And this will appeare in the preparation for warre the levying of warre and mannaging thereof after its levied for the preparation it consisteth in leavying men and munition or of money In all which questionlesse will be a difference between raising of warre by a King to revenge a personall injury done to the Kings own person and a warre raised by the whole Kingdome or representative body thereof which is commonly done in defence of publique interest and seldome in any offensive way unlesse in recovery of a right of possession either formerly lost or as yet not fully setled Now although it be true that seldome do injuries reflect upon the Kings person alone but that the Kingdom will be concerned therein to endeavour a remedy yet because it may fall out otherwise Kings having been occasioned to leavy war of their own accord but in such case could neither compell the persons of his subjects or their estates to be contributory And of this nature I take the warre leavied by Harold against the Conquerour to be wherein the greatest part of the Kingdome was never ingaged nor therefore did it feele the dint of the Conquerours Sword at all and in this case the Militia must be allowed to such as beare the purse nor can it be concluded to be the Militia of the Kingdome nor any part thereof although it may connive thereat But to set this consideration aside as not coincident at all with the Norman ingagements after they were crowned and to take all the subsequent warres to be meerly defensive of the right of the Crown as in sober construction they will appeare to be as touching the levying of money its evident that it lay onely in the power of the grand Councell of the Kingdome for otherwise the laws were setled that no Tax should be made or taken but such as were due in the Confessors time as formerly hath been shewed Secondly for the preparing of men and munition it was done either by tenure or by speciall law as touching tenure it was provided by way of contract that those that held by Knights service should be ready with their Armes to assist the King for the defence of the Realme So as they were not bound by their tenure to ayd him in any other cases Ll. Gulielm cap. 57. Others were also by especiall law of the Land bound to be ready for their service in that kind For all the inhabitants of this Kingdome held their estates under a generall service which by common right they are bound to performe viz. in time of danger to joyn in defence of their Countrey This is the common fealty or allegiance which all men owe Ll. Gulielm c. 59. and
may see the great difference between the Prince and the King in one and the same man The most part of those laws were little other then plaisters applied to particular botches of those times wherein the King dealt with a tender hand as if he feared to ulcerate any part and especially the Clergy and therefore delivered the last law in a petitionary way to the Clergy because it concerned the execution of justice in prohibited times and yet bound up all with a salvo to himselfe and his prerogative like a wise King that would neither loose right nor doe wrong nor yet stickle to debate with his subjects now when as his eye was upon a further marke Walsing 46. For Leolin the Prince of VVales had affronted him and though he could not endure affronts yet could he dissemble them for advantage and so he suffered the Parliament to runne its course that he might have done the sooner Otherwise he had a seed of his fathers conceit that laws are not made for Kings as appeared afterward for after he had gotten his army into the field he tooke a fifteenth which was granted to his father and this was inaudito more M. West An 1276. but there was no disputing with power and therefore the subject must be contented rather to score it up against the future then require present pay so dangerous a thing it is for England that Kings should have occasion to gather armies though for never so honourable imployment The Welsh chase is hotly pursued yet it did not rid much way for it cost the English a voyage of nine yeeres travell before they could attaine the shore although it had been often within their view It may be the King found it advantagious for his government to maintaine an Army in the field under the colour of the Welsh warre that he might more bow his subjects to his own bent for during these warres the King made many breathings and tooke time to looke to the husbanding of his own revenue as those Ordinances called Extenta manerii and Officium coronatoris doe witnesse and the Statute of Bigami But the people were not altogether yet tamed for the times being still in warres and they occasioning much waste of treasure put the King to the utmost pitch of good husbandry and one degree beyond the same so as under colour of seising his own he swept up also the priviledges and liberties of his subjects M. West Polyd. virg some authours reciting the complaints of the Church men others of the Laity so as it seemeth the King was no respecter of persons but his own This and others not unlike had almost occasioned another combuston had not the meeting at Glocester setled things for the present by referring the right of franchises to debate in the Eyer and ordering reseisure of such liberties into the subjects hands whereof they had been dispossessed by Quo warranto and Quo jure under colour of the fourth chapter of the Statute of Bigami Neverthelesse however debonaire the King seemed to be the sore between him and his subjects was not fully cured nor did the Lords trust him further then needs must for whether they served in the field or met at councell still they were armed and during this daring of each other were many profitable lawes made whiles neither party durst venture bloodshed in touching too nigh upon the priviledges of each other principally because the affaires in Wales were but laid asleepe and upon reviving might turne the ballance to either side The wars awake againe and therein are consumed nigh five yeeres more of the Kings reigne so as what ever his intent was he could have hitherto little opportunity to effect any thing for the advancement of the prerogative of the Crown at home Nor had he scarcely breathed himselfe and army from the Welsh wars but he found both France and Scotland his enemies at once The King faced onely the first and fought the second which held him work the remainder of his daies at the same time also he arred both the Clergy and Laity at his own home as if providence had given him security for the good behaviour and yet it failed him in the issue and left him to the censure of the world whether his justice was spontaneous or by necessity for as yet he held the grand Charter at parley and therefore was rather eyed then much trusted Albeit he was put upon confidence in the subjects discretion for ayd of him in his continuall undertakings nor did they disclaime him herein however chargable it was for all seem willing he should be imployed any where so as not within the foure Seas It s probable the King knew it and therefore having made a voyage into France he changed the Scene of warre but to the other side as it were of a river in hope his Lords would follow but it would not be this angred him and he them nor would his Clergy allow him any ayd papa inconsulto and therefore he outs them from his protection these and his irregular preparations for warre by summons not onely of his Knights but all other that held Land worth 20 li. per annum Walfing 69. and taxes imposed by an arbitrary way increased rancour into a kind of state scoule little better then a quarrell for appeasing whereof the King granted a consultation upon a prohibition and unto both Clergy and Laity a confirmation of the grand Charter at the long runne and allowed it as the common law of the Kingdome and seconded the same with many succeeding confirmations in the 27 25 Edw. 1. 28 yeeres of his reigne as if he had utterly renounced all thought of a contrary way but the Stat. in his 28th yeere had a sting in the taile that was as ill as his saving of ancient ayd and prisals which was in the Stat. of confirmation of the Charters though it were omitted in this Stat. for the saving was of such a sence as time and occasion would move the Kings heart to make it and thus this Statute became like a Hocus pocus a thing to still the people for the present and serve the Kings turne that he might more freely intend the conquest of the Scots which once done he might if he would try masteries with England But God would not have it so the King in Scotland had power to take but could not overtake and the Scots like birds of the prey had wit enough to fly away and courage enough to return upon advantages and so the King was left to hunt the wind which made him to return He might now expect the applause of his people for his good successe and the terrour of those that had stopped the broad way of his extravigant prerogative and therfore looks bigge rubs up old sores and having his Army yet in the field sends for those Lords that would not follow him in his warres in Flanders all come and submit and as
was in those elder times but in two cases viz. of Kings and Castles in the one of which the government is principally concerned in the other the publique defence For it may be well conjectured that Castles were either first made in places commodious for habitation and great Towns gathered to them for their better safety or that the Townes were first gathered in places of commodious habitation and then Castles were made for their better defence or if they were imposed upon them by the victor to keepe them in awe they were neverthelesse by continuance together become tractable and conspired for the mutuall defence of each other But as touching such Cittadels or Castles that were set in solitary places they may seem rather first intended for the particular defence of some particular man and his family and neighbouring tenants and therefore in the purveyance for Castles it seems the proper Town wherein it is is principally liable to that duty because their safety is more principally interested and therefore prizes there taken may be payd at a day to come but in all other places immediately Neverthelesse this lasted not long for the souldiers found out a tricke of favouring their own quarters and preserving them in heart against a back winter knowing that at such times its better to seeke for provision nigh then to be compelled to seeke far off But this Stratagem was cut off by the next King who inhibited all manner of purveyance in any other Town Westm 1. cap. 7 then in the same Town wherein the Castle is seated This was a charge that was but temporary and occasionall That which was more lasting and burdensome upon the subjects was purveyance for the King which neverthelesse cannot be avoyded by reason of the greatnesse of his retinue especially in those daies and if they should have their resort to the market the same could not be free to the people for that the first service must be for the Kings household and so what scraps will be left for the Commons no man can tell It was therefore necessary for the Kings family to be maintained by purveyance Artic. super cart cap. 2. and to avoyd the many inconveniences which might and did arise in those spoyling times It was ordained that it should be felony for any purveyor to purvy without warrant 2. That none but the Kings purveyour must purvey for the Kings house and that he must purvey onely for the Kings house and to purvey no more then is necessary and to pay for the things they take And because Kings were oftentimes necessitated for removall from place to place purveyance of carriage was also allowed West 1. c. 32. and in case the subjects were grieved either by more purveyance then was necessary or by non payment for their commodities so taken or with composition for the Kings debts for such purveyance the offenders were lyable to fine and imprisonment Artic super cart cap. 2. Or if they were grieved by purveyours without warrant the offender was to be proceeded against as in case of felony He that serveth in Castle-guard is not liable to payment of rent for that service cap. 22. Nor is he compellable to either so long as he is in the service in the Army By the ancient custome none but a Knight might be charged with the guard of a Castle belonging to the King for the letter of this law mentioneth onely such and therefore to hold by Castle-guard is a tenure in Knight-service and it seemeth that rent for Castle guard originally was consistent with Knightservice and that it was not annuall but promiscuously Knights might either performe the service or pay rent in lieu thereof and upon occasion did neither if the King sent them into the field And lastly that a Knight might either doe the service in his own person or by his Esquire or another appointed by him thereto No Knights nor Lords nor Church-mens Carriages cap. 23. nor no mans wood shall be taken against the owners consent Nor shall any mans Carriages be taken if he will pay the hire limited by the Law Churchmen were exempted from charge to the Kings carriages meerely in favour to the Canon which exempted the goods of the Clergy from such lay service neverthelesse the complaints of the Clergy formerly mentioned shew that this was not duely observed Knights and Lords were discharged not onely for the maintenance of their port but more principally because they were publique servants for the defence of the Kingdome in time of warre and the Kingdome was then equally served by themselves and their equipage and their carriages as a necessary assistant thereunto The King shall have no more profit of felons Lands then the yeere and a day cap. 24. and the Lord is to have the remainder Anciently the Lords had all the estate of felons being their tenants Instit 2. and the King had onely the prerogative to waste them as a penalty or part thereof but afterwards the Lords by agreement yeelded unto the King the yeere and a daies profit to save the Lands from spoile Bract. lib. 3. fo 137. Prerog Reg. cap. 16. and in continuance of time the King had both the yeere and day and waste Fugitives also were in the same case viz. such as deserted their Countrey either in time of need or such as fled from the triall of Law in criminall cases for in both cases the Saxons accounted them as common felons Neverthelesse the two customes of Gloucester and Kent are saved out of this law by the Statute the first whereof saves the Land to the heire from the Lord and the second saves the same to the heires males or for want of such to the heires females and to the wife her moity untill she be espoused to another man Prerog Reg. cap. 14. Fits 2 E. 2. Tit. Escheat 12. unlesse she shall forfeit the same by fornication during her widdowhood And by the same law also the King had all Escheates of the tenants of Archbshops and Bishops during the vacancy as a perquisite But Escheats of Land and Tenement in Cities or Burroughs the King had them in jure coronae of whomsoever they were holden cap. 25. All weares shall be destroyed but such as are by the Sea coaste The Lieutenant of the Tower of London as it seemed claimed a Lordship in the Thames and by vertue thereof had all the weares to his own use as appeareth by a Charter made to the City of London recited in the second institutes upon this Law and this was to the detriment of the free men especially of the City of London in regard that all free men were to have right of free passage through Rivers as well as through high waies and purprestures in either were equally noxious to the common liberty and therefore that which is set down under the example or instance of the rivers of Thames and Medway contained all the rivers in
we finde that Henry the third about the latter part of his reigne when his government grew towards the dregs he having in the Kingdome two hundred and fifty Baronies he summoned unto one of these Parliamentary meetings Gloss tit Baron but five and twenty Barons and one hundred and fifty of his Clergy Neverthelesse the law of King John was still the same and we cannot rightly read the law in such presidents as are rather the birth of will then reason Fourthly that no ayds were then granted but such as passed under the title Escuage or according there unto for the words are No Escuage shall be demanded or granted or taken but for redeeming the Kings person Knighting of his sonne or marriage of his daughter Nor is the way of assessing in these times different saving that instead of all the knights two onely are now chosen in every County the tenure as it seemeth first giving the title of that order and both tenure and order now changed into that title taken up for the time and occasion Fifthly that it was then the ancient custome and so used in the time of Henry the first that the advice of those then present was the advice of the whole and that their advice passed for a law without contradiction or notwithstanding the Kings negative voice for the words are The matter at that day shall proceed according to the councell of those that shall be present although all doe not come and therefore that clause in the Kings oath quas vulgus eligerit may well be understood in the future and not in the pretertence Last of all though not gathered from the text of this law whereof we treat yet being coincident with the matter it is observable that though the Clergy were now in their ruffle and felt themselves in their full strength yet there befell a posture of state that discovered to the world that the English held not the interest of the Clergy to be of such publique concernment or necessary concurrence in the government of the Kingdome Walsing An. 1297. as was pretended For the Clergy finding assessements of the Laity so heavy and that occasions of publique charge were like to multiply daily they therefore to save the maine stocke procured an inhibition from Rome against all such impositions from the Laity and against such payments by the Clergy and in the strength of this they absolutely refused to submit to ayd Edward the first by any such way although all the Parliament had thereunto consented And thus having divided themselves from the Parliament they were by them devided from it and not onely outed of all priviledge of Parliament but of all the priviledge of subjects into the state of praemuniri and thus set them up for a monument to future times for them also to act without the consent of those men as occasion should offer But Henry 3d. not satisfied with this ancient and ordinary way of assessement upon ordinary occasions tooke up that extraordinary course of assessement upon all the free men of the Kingdome which was formerly taken up onely in that extraordinary occasion of redeeming of the Kings or Lords person out of captivity and common defence of the land from piracy and under the title of Daneguelt which was now absolutly dead and hanged up in chains as a monument of oppression Neverthelesse it cannot be denied but that in former times the free men were as deeply taxed if not oppressed with payments to their Lords at such times as they were charged over to the King in the cases aforesaid as by the latter words of the law aforesaid of King John doth appeare and whereby its probable that the inferiour Lords were gainers The conclusion of the Charter of Henry the third the fame suiting also with the third observation foregoing doth not a little favour the same for its expresly set down that in lieu of the Kings confirmation of the Charter of liberties aforesaid not onely the Archbishops Bishops Abbots Priors Earles Barons and Knights but also the free men and all the Kingdome gave a fifteenth of all their moveables And thus have I summed up and compared both the copies of the grand Charters of Englands liberties saving two particulars inserted into the Forest laws of Henry the third wherein if any thing had been new and unreasonable King John might have colour to except against them as extorted by force and Henry the third might as he was advised plead nonage M. Paris An. 1227. and so they might have been choked in their birth but being all consuetudines as in the conclusion they are called and Kings ashamed to depend upon such frivolous exceptions it may be wondred what might move them to adventure so much bloodshed and themselves into so many troubles to avoyd their own acts unlesse the writing of them were an obligation acknowledged before the world and they resolving secretly to be under none were loath to publish the same to all men It s a strange vanity in great men to pretend love to justice and yet not indure to be bound thereto when as we see that God himselfe loves to be bound by his word and to have it pleaded because he delights as much to be acknowledged true in performing as good in promising But neither was King John or Henry the third of this spirit faine they would undoe but could not It s true it was at the first but a Kings charter of confirmation and had Kings been patient therewith it might have grown no bigger but by opposition it rooted deeper and grew up unto the stature of a Statute and setled so fast as it can never be voided but by surrender from the whole body Marlbr cap. 5. Having thus summed up the liberties of the subjects and free men of England under this Charter I shall make some appendix hereunto by annexing a few additionals in these times established and although they come not within the letter of the Grand charter yet are they subservient thereunto And first concerning the King and this either as he is King or as he is Lord. As King he had these prerogatives above all Lords Prerog Reg. cap. 9. The King shall have the custody of fooles and ideots lands for their maintenance and shall render the same to their heires And concerning mad-men and lunaticks cap. 10. the King shall provide a Baylisse for their maintenance rendring account to them when they are sober or to their administrators It is no lesse liberty or priviledge of the people that fooles and mad persons are to be ordered by tutors then children and therefore this may be annexed to the rest of the liberties as well as the other Neverthelesse it seemeth that the Laws tooke them into their regard in respect of their estates which might be abused to the prejudice of the publique rather then out of respect had to their persons Now because there is a difference between the disability