Authority of Parliament made in the Eleventh of King Edward aforesaid and therefore to supply that defect in the Fifth of Edward the Third he was created Duke of Cornwall by special Charter Elizabeth eldest Daughter of King Edward the Fourth was not a Dutchess of Cornwall although she was the Firstbegotten Daughter of Edward the Fourth for the Limitation is to the First-begotten Son Henry the Eighth was not in the life of his Father King Henry the Seventh after the death of his eldest Brother Arthur Duke of Cornwall by force of the said Creation for although he was sole Heir apparent yet he was not his eldest begotten Son And the Opinion of Stamford a Learned Judge hath been That he shall have within his Dukedom of Cornwall the King's Prerogative because it is not severed from the Crown after the form as it is given for none shall be Inheritor thereof but the King 's of the Realm For example whereas by Common Law if a man hold divers Mannors or other Lands or Tenements of divers Lords all by Knights Service some part by Priority and ancient Feoffment and other Land by Posterity and a later Feoffment and the Tenant so seized dieth and his Son and Heir within Age in this case the custody and wardship of the Body and his marriage may not be divided amongst all the Lords but one of them only shall have right unto it because the Body of a man is intire And therefore the Law doth say That the Lord of whom some part of those Lands are holden by Priority and by the same Tenure of Chivalry shall have it except the King be any of the Lords for then though the Tenant did purchase that Land last yet after his death the King shall be preferred before any of the other Lords of whom the Tenant did hold the Priority And so shall the Duke of Cornwall in the same Case have the Prerogative if his Tenant die holding of him but by posterity of Feoffment for any Tenure of his Dutchy of Cornwall although the same Duke is not seized of any particular Estate whereof the Reversion remaineth in the King for the Prince is seized in Fee of his Dukedom as beforesaid Iohn of Gaunt the fourth Son of King Edward the Third took to Wife Blanch Daughter and Heir of Henry Duke of Lancaster who had Issue Henry King of England so that the said Dutchy of Lancaster did come unto the said Henry by descent from the party of his Mother and being a Subject he was to observe the Common Law of the Realm in all things concerning his Dutchy For if he would depart in Fee with any thereof he must have made Livery and Seisin or if he had made a Lease for life reserving Rent with a Re-entry for default of payment and the Rent happen to be behind the Duke might not enter without making his Demand or if he had alienated any part thereof whilst he was within Age he might defeat the Purchaser for that Cause and if he would grant a Reversion of an Estate for life or years in being there must also be Attornment or else the Grant doth not take effect But after that he had deposed King Richard the Second and did assume the Royal Estate and so had conjoyned his Natural Body in the Body Politick of the King of this Realm and so was become King then the possession of the Dutchy of Lancaster was in him as King but not as Duke which degree of Dignity was swallowed up in that of the King for the lesser must always give place to the greater And likewise the Name of the Dutchy and the Franchises Liberties and Jurisdictions thereof when in the King's Hands were by the Common Law extinct and after that time the possessions of the Dutchy of Lancaster could not pass from Henry the Fourth by Livery of Seisin but by his Letters Patents under the Great Seal without Livery of Seisin and with Attornment And if he make a Lease for Life being Duke reserving a Rent with a Re-entry for default of payment and after his Assumption of the Crown his Rent happen to be unpaid he might Re-enter without Demand for the King is not bound to such personal Ceremonies as his Subjects are Therefore to have the said Dutchy to be still a Dutchy with the Liberties to the same as it was beâ—ore and to alter the order and degree of the Lands of the Dutchy from the Crown the said King Henry the Fourth made a Charter by Authority of Parliament which is entituled Charta Regis Hen. 4. de separatione Lancastriae à corona authoritate Parliamenti Anno Regni sui primo as by the Tenor thereof may appear And so by Authority of that Parliament the said Dutchy with all the Franchises and Liberties was meerly resigned from the Crown and from the Ministers and Officers thereof and from the Order to pass by such Conveyance which the Law did require in the possessions of the Crown But now the possessions of the Dutchy by force of the said Statute stood divided from the Crown and ought to be demeaned and ordered and pass as they did before Henry the Fourth was King yet there is no Clause in the Charter which doth make the person of the King who hath the Dutchy in any other Degree than it was before But things concerning his pleasure shall be in the same estate as they were before such separation insomuch as if the Law before the Charter by Authority of Parliament adjudged the person of the King always of full Age having regard unto his Gifts as well of the Lands which he doth inherit in the right of his Crown or Body Politick it shall be so adjudged for the Dutchy Land after the said Statute for the Statute doth go and reach unto the Estate Order and Condition of the Lands of the Dutchy but doth not extend unto the person of the King who hath the Lands in points touching his person Neither doth that distinguish or alter the preheminences which the Law doth give to the person of the King For if King Henry the Fourth after the said Act had made a Lease or other Grant of parcel of the Dutchy by the Name of Henry Duke of Lancaster only it had been void for it should have been made in the Name of Henry the Fourth King of England And thus stood the Dutchy of Lancaster severed from the Crown all the Reign of Henry the Fourth Henry the Fifth and Henry the Sixth being politickly made for the upholding of the Dutchy of Lancaster their true and ancient Inheritance however the right Heir to the Crown might in future time obtain his right thereunto as it happened in King Edward the Fourth's time but after the said King Edward obtained his right unto the Crown in Parliament he attainted Henry the Sixth and appropriated and annexed the said Dutchy again to the Crown as by the Statute thereof made in the first of the King's Reign
Parliament by Writ as Baron such Heir Male omitting the Husband of the Issue of such Heir Female And this also appeareth by a notable Controversie in the time of Henry the Seventh between Sir Robert Willoughby Lord Brook and Richard Lord Lattimer for the Barony of Lattimer which in effect was The said Lord Brook did challenge the Barony of Lattimer as Coâ—in and Heir of Elizabeth his Great-grandmother who was Sister and Heir of Iohn Nevill Lord Lattimer who died without Issue And hereupon exhibited a Petition to Henry the Seventh in Parliament whereunto Richard Lord Lattimer was called to answer because he then enjoyed the said Title and Dignity The said Richard Lord Lattimer did by his Answer shew That after the death of the said Iohn Nevill Lord Lattimer without Issue the said Elizabeth was his Sister and next Heir and married unto Thomas Willoughby Knight second Son of the Lord Willoughby But Henry the Sixth for that the said Iohn Nevill Lord Lattimer was dead without Issue and that the next Heir was Female did therefore call to the Parliament George Nevill Knight second Son of Henry Earl of Westmoreland to be Lord Lattimer as Cosin and next Heir Male of the said Iohn Nevill Lord Lattimer which George was Grandfather of the said Richard Lord Lattimer Father of the said Richard In debate of which cause the Question now in hand namely Whether a Barony by Writ may descend to the Heirs Female was advisedly considered of by the King and his Nobility in Parliament and in the end adjudged with the said Richard Lord Lattimer which President doth afford us two Judgments in this point And in the time of Henry the Sixth when the Writ was directed to the said Sir George Nevill Knight whereby he was summoned as Lord Lattimer to the Parliament and as Heir Male and not the said Thomas Willoughby Knight husband of the said Elizabeth Heir Female And the second Judgment was given in the time of Henry the Seventh whereby the said Barony was adjudged to the said Richard Lord Lattimer coming out of the special Heir Male against the Lord Brook descended of the general Heir Male. But here in this President before remembred of the Barony of Dacres may be objected to encounter this Conclusion for there was an Heir Female married unto Sir Richard Fines who by the Declaration of King Henry the Sixth was Baron of Dacres in right of his wife And there was also Ralph and Humphrey the Heirs Males before whom the Heir Female was preferred by the censure of Henry the Sixth and Edward the Fourth This Objection is easily answered for although Henry the Sixth through the Princely favour which he bore unto Sir Richard Fines had declared him to be Lord Dacres in right of his wife yet notwithstanding did Ralph Dacres being Heir Male then unto the Lord Dacres and by that name was attainted in Parliament Anno primo Hen. 4. Wherefore the reason why the Heir Male could not be regarded was the said Attainder of the said Raâ—ph and Humphrey his brother and therefore when Humphrey in the 12 th of Edward the Fourth laboured to have the said Attainder Reversed he submitted himself to the Arbitrement of the King who to satisfie both Competitors both having deserved of him after he had admitted them to his favour he allowed one to be Lord Dacres and the other to be the Lord Dacres of Gillesland And thus much concerning the second Point Whether a Barony by Writ may descend unto the Heir Female The third Point As concerning the third Point admitting such Descent to be to the Heir Female when there is no Heir Male that may claim the same for then doth this Question take place Whether the husband of such an Heir Female shall enjoy the Dignity in right of his wife or no Wherein we are to rest upon a Resolution had and given to this special Question which was in this manner In the time of Henry the Eighth when Mr. Winby took upon him the style of Lord Talbois in right of his wife having no Issue by her The said King assisted both by Civil and Temporal Lawyers gave Sentence That no husband of a Baroness in her right should use that Style and Dignity until he had by her a Child whereby she should become Tenant by Courtesie unto her Inheritance The special Reasons that occasioned this Sentence were two First It should be convenient for her husband this day to be a Baron and a Peer of the Realm and to morrow by the death of his wife to become none and without the default of the party Secondly If he had Issue by wife and were entituled to be Tenant by the Courtesie of England of his wives Lands if he shall not also bear the Style and Dignity of his Wives Barony then should the Son after the death of his mother dying in the life time of his father be a Baron and Lord without Land for so the father should have the Land as Tenant by Courtesie and the Son the Lordship without Land And thus much said concerning the Nature Quality and Estate of a Baron by Writ and for the Resolution of the several points and Articles of the Question proposed may suffice CHAP. XII Barons by Patent which is the third kind of Barons mentioned in the former Division of Barons THere is also a fourth means of Creation viz. by Act of Parliament but the first two mentioned and this other by Patent is most usual for the Honour of the King for thereby the Donation doth proceed from his Majesty only as from the Fountain of Honour But when the Creation is by Parliament the King ever is one and may be said to be Donor A Baron therefore by Creation by reason of Letters Patents is that noble Person whom the King or any of his Progenitors Kings of this Realm have created Baron by such their Letters Patents began in the Reign of King Richard the Second This kind of Dignity of a Baron shall be of such continuance in Descent or otherwise as shall be limited in the Habendum in such Letters Patents contained for it may be but for the life of him to whom it is given or for term vanter vie as some hold Opinion in the 32 of Hen. 6. for cujus est dare est disponere It may be in special in our general Tayl and this kind of Tayl was usual before the Statute made decimo tertio of Edw. 1. by which Estate Tayl of Lands and Tenements was created as appeareth by the Patent whereby Hubert de Burgo was made Earl of Kent in the time of Henry the Third by these words Habendum sibi haeredibus suis de corpore Margaretae uxoris sui sorors Alexandri Regis Scotiae procreatis pro defectu talis exitus remanere in directis haeredibus dicti Huberti And that Estates intayl are at this Day of Titles of Honour by the said Statute of Westminster the second Question If a
Heraldry written by Iohn Guillim about fol. 18. That Sisters are allowed no differences of Badges in their Coat-Armour by reason that by them the name of the House cannot be preserved but are admitted to the Inheritance equally and are adjudged but one Heir to all intents and purposes whatsoever And the knowledge of this point in these days is worthy to be enquired into for this is to be observed out of Presidents and to be acknowledged of every dutiful Subject that the King can advance to Honour whom he pleaseth And therefore whereas Radulph Cromwell being a Baron by Writ died without Issue having two Sisters and Coheirs Elizabeth the eldest married unto Sir Thomas Nevill Knight and Ioan the younger married to Sir Humphrey Bowcher who was called to Parliament as Lord Cromwell and not the said Sir Thomas Nevill who married the eldest Sister And Hugh Lupus the first and greatest Earl of Chester Habendum sibi haeredibus adeo libere per gladium sicut iple Rex tenuit Angliam per tenorem Hugh died without Issue and the Inheritance of his Earldom was divided amongst his four Sisters and the eldest had not the Seigniory entire unto herself If a Woman be Noble by Birth or Descent with whomsoever she doth marry although her Husband be under her Degree yet she doth remain Noble for Birth-right est Character indelebilis Other Women are enobled by Marriage and the Text saith thus viz. Women ennobled with the Honour of their Husbands and with the Kindred of their Husbands we worship them in the Court we decree matters to pass in the Names of their Husbands and into the House and Surname of their Husbands do we translate them But if afterwards a Woman do marry with a Man of a baser Degree then she loseth her former Dignity and followeth the condition of her latter Husband And concerning the second disparaged Marriage as aforesaid many other Books of the Law do agree for these be Rules conceived in those Cases Si mulier nobilis nupserit ignobili desinit esse nobilis eodem modo quo quid constituitur dissolvitur It was the Case of Ralph Howard Esq who took to Wife Anne the widow of the Lord Powes they brought an Action against the Duke of Suffolk by the Name of Ralph Howard Esq and the Lady Anne Powes his Wife and exception was taken for mis-naming of her because she ought to have been named of her Husband's Name and not otherwise and the Exception was by the Court allowed For said they by the Law of God she is Sub potestate viri and by our Law her Name of Dignity shall be changed according to the Degrees of her Husband notwithstanding the Courtesie of the Ladies of Honour and Court Dyer 79. And the like is also in Queen Maries Reign when the Dutchess of Suffolk took to her Husband Adrian Brook Title Brief 54. 6. And many other Presidents have been of later times And herewith agreeth the Civil Law Digest lib. 1. title q. lege 1. In this Case of acquired Nobility by marriage if question in Law be whereupon an Issue is taken between the Parties that is to say Dutchesses are not Dutchesses Countesses are not Countesses and Baronesses are not Baronesses the Trial whereof shall not be by Record as in the former Case but by a Jury of Twelve men and the reason of the diversity is because in this Case the Dignity is accrued unto her by her Marriage which the Lawyers term Matter in Fact and not by any Record But a Noble Woman by marriage though she take to her second Husband a man of mean Degree yet she may keep two Chaplains according to the Proviso in the Statute of 11. Hen. 8. Case 13. for and in respect of the Honour which once she had viz. at the time of the Retainer And every such Chaplain may purchase Licence and Dispensation c. And Chaplains may not be Non-residents afterwards And forasmuch as the retaining of Chaplains by Ladies of great Estate is ordinary and nevertheless some questions in Law have been concerning the true understanding of the said Statute Law I think it not impertinent to set down subsequent Resolutions of the Judges touching such matters So long as the Wife of a Duke is called Dutchess or of an Earl a Countess and have the fruition of the Honour appertaining to their Estate with kneeling tasting serving so long shall a Baron's Widow be saluted Lady as is also a Knight's Wife by the courtesie of England quamdiâ— matrimonium aut viduitas uxoris durant except she happen to clope with an Adulterer for as the Laws of this Kingdom do adjudge that a Woman shall lose her Dowry in that as unto Lands Tenements and Justice so doth the Laws of Gentry and Nobleness give Sentence against such a Woman advanced to Titles of Dignity by the Husband to be unworthy to enjoy the same when she putting her Husband out of her mind subjects her self unto another If a Lady which is married come through the Forest she shall not take any thing but a Dutchess Marchioness or Countess shall have advantage of the Statute de Charta Forest. 12 Artic. during the time that she is unmarried This is a Rule in the Civil Law Si filia Regis nubat alicui Duci vel Comiti ducetur tamen semper regalis As amongst Noble Women there is a difference of Degrees so according to their distinct Excellencies the Law doth give special priviledges as followeth By the Statute 25 Edw. 3. cap. 1. it is High Treason to compass or imagine the death of the Queen or to violate the King's Companion The King's Response is a sole person except by the Common Law and she may purchase in Feesimple or make Leases or Grants with the King she may plead and be impleaded which no other married Woman can do without her Husband All Acts of Parliament for any cause which any way may concern the Queen are such Statutes whereof the Judges ought to take Recognizances as of general Statutes though the matter doth only concern the capacity of the Queen yet it doth also concern all the Subjects of the Realm for every Subject hath interest in the King and none of his Subjects within his Laws are divided from the King who is Head and Sovereign so that his business concerns all the Realm and as the Realm hath interest in the King so and for the same Reason is the Queen being his Wife A man seized of divers Lands in Fee holden by Knight's Service some by Priority that is by ancient Feoffment holden of others and some other part holden of the King in posteriority the King granteth his Seigniory to the Queen during her life and afterwards the Tenant dieth his Son within Age in this case he shall have the Wardship of the Body and have the Prerogative even as the King himself should have had The Queen Consort or Dowager shall not be amerced if she be Nonsuited
again into the Hall where he shall sit at Table with the Knights and being risen and retired into his Chamber his Attire is taken off and again clothed with a blew Robe having on his left Shoulder a Lace of white Silk hanging to be worn upon all his Garments from that day forwards till he have gained some Honour and Renown for some Feats of Arms or some Prince or Lady of Quality cut that Lace from his Shoulder After Dinner the Knights must come to the Knight and conduct him into the King's presence to return him thanks for these Honours and so takes his leave of the King and the Governours craving his pardon for any miscarriage and claiming their Fees according to the Custom of the Court also take their leaves of the Knight I shall conclude this Chapter with giving an Account of the Knights made at the Coronation of his Majesty Knights of the Bath made at the Coronation of his Majesty King CHARLES the Second EDward Lord Clinton now Earl of Lincoln Iohn Egerton Viscount Brackley eldest Son to the Earl of Bridgwater Sir Philip Herbert then second Son to the Earl of Pembroke Sir William Egerton second Son to the Earl of Bridgwater Sir Vere Fane second Son to the Earl of Westmoreland Sir Charles Berkley eldest Son to George Lord Berkley Sir Henry Bellasis eldest Son to the Lord Bellasis Sir Henry Hyde now Earl of Clarendon Sir Rowland Bellasis Brother to Viscount Faulconberg Sir Henry Capell Sir Iohn Vaughan now eldest Son to the Earl of Carbery Sir Charles Stanley Grandchild to the late Earl of Derby Sir Francis Fane Sir Henry Fane Grandchildren to the Earl of Westmoreland Sir William Portman Baronet Sir Richard Temple Baronet Sir William Ducy Baronet Sir Thomas Trevor Baronet Sir Iohn Scudamore Baronet Sir William Gardiner Baronet Sir Charles Cornwallis afterwards Lord Cornwallis Sir Iohn Nicholas Sir Iohn Monson Sir Bourcher VVray Sir Iohn Coventry Sir Edward Hungerford Sir Iohn Knevett Sir Philip Boteler Sir Adrian Scroop Sir Richard Knightley Sir Henry Heron. Sir Iohn Lewkenor Sir George Brown Sir William Tyrringhum Sir Francis Godolphin Sir Edward Baynton Sir Greville Verney Sir Edward Harley Sir Edward VValpool Sir Francis Popham Sir Edward VVise. Sir Christopher Calthrop Sir Richard Edgcombe Sir William Bromley Sir Thomas Bridges Sir Thomas Fanshaw Sir Iohn Denham Sir Nicholas Bacon Sir Iames Altham Sir Thomas VVendy Sir Iohn Bramston Sir George Freeman Sir Nicholas Slaning Sir Richard Ingoldsby Sir Iohn Rolle Sir Edward Heath Sir William Morley Sir Iohn Bennet Sir Hugh Smith Sir Simon Leech Sir Henry Chester Sir Robert Atkyns now one of the Justices of the Common Pleas. Sir Robert Gayre Sir Richard Powle Sir Hugh Ducy Sir Stephen Hales Sir Ralph Bash. Sir Thomas VVhitmore OF Knights Batchelors With what is incident to that Degree of KNIGHTHOOD According to the Laws of England CHAP. XXI THE particular kinds of Services by which Lands of Inheritance are distinguished are two viz. Knights of Service and Knights of Soccage And in ancient time Tenure by Knights Service was called Regale servitiâ—m because it was done to and for the King and Realm and forinsecum servitium as appeareth in the 19 Edw. 2. Avowry 224. 26. Ass. p. 66. 7. Hen. 4. 19. Coke's seventh Part 8. a. Calvin's case because they who hold by Escuage ought to do and perform their Services out of the Realm Litt. 35. ideo forinsecum dici potest sit quia capitur foris hujusmodi servitia persolvuntur ratione Tenementorum non Personarum And as knights-service-Knights-Service-Land requireth the service of the Tenant in Warfare and Battel abroad so Soccage-Tenure commandeth the attendance at the Plough the one by Manhood defending the King or his Lord's life and person the other by industry maintaining with Rents Corn and Victuals his Estate and Family For Kings did thus order their own Lands and Tenements one part they kept and detained in their own hands and in them stately Houses and Castles were erected and made for their habitations and defence of their Persons and of the Realm also Forests and Parks were there made for their Majesties Recreation One other part thereof was given to the Nobles and others of their Chivalry reserving Tenure by Knights Service The third part was bestowed upon men of meaner condition and quality with reservation of Soccage-Tenure And in this manner the Dukes and Nobles amongst their Menials and Followers dissipated a great part of their Lands viz. to their Gentlemen of quality to hold by Knights Service and to other of meaner condition by Soccage-Tenure The Right Honourable S. Ioseph Williams on of Milbeck hall in Cumberland Knight one of his Majestys principall Secretarys of State c a. The Honourable Sr. Robert Atkins of Totteridge in Hertford shire and of Sapperton in Glocester shire Knight of the Bath and one of his matys Iustices of the ComÌ„on pleas c a. Sr. Iohn Bennet of Dawly in Midd sx Kt. of the honble order of the Bath Leivtenant to his maties Band of Gentlemen Pentioners and eldest brother to the Rt. honble Henry Earle of Arlington who was first maried to Elizabeth Countess of Mulgrave daughter to the Earle of Midd sx and now to Bridget Howe of the Family of Sr. Grubham Howe Sr. Robert Southwell Knight one of the Clerkes attending his Majesty King Charles the Second in his most Honourable privy Councell câ—t Sr. Hugh Wyndham of Silton in Dorsetshire Kt. one of the Iustices of his matys Court of Comon pleas at Westminster eighth sonn of S. Iohn Wyndham of Orchard-Wyndham in Somersetshire Kt who was lineally descended from the antient Family of the Wyndhams of Felbrigg in Norfolk â—ownâ—r therâ—of Sr. Thomas Daniell of Beswick in the East Rideing of Yorkshire Kt. Major to his matys Regiment of Foot Guards and Captaine of his matys Archchiffe Fort in Dover Sr. Thomas Mompessonâ— antiently Montpintsonâ— of Bathampton in Wiltshire Knight a person of eminent Loyalty and suffering in the late trouble whose Family have been of greate antiquity in the said County Sr. Thomas Lynch of Great Sonkey in Lancashire Kt. one of the Gentlemen of his matyâ— privy Chamber in ordinary and late Governour of his Ma â—â—â— Island of Jamaica decended of the Lincâ—â—s of Groves in Kent and is now maried to Vere Herbert 2â— daughter of Sr. Edw Herbert sometyme Lord Keeper of the groâ—t seaâ—e Sr. William Pelham of Brocklesby in Lincolnshire Kt. whose Grandfatâ—er Sr. William Pelham of the said place Kt. who was descended of the antient family of the Pelhams of Langhtoniâ—â— sussex was employed under Queen Eliz in the offices of L d cheife Justice of Ireland Marshall of the English forces sentinto the Low Countrys Mastâ—â— of her ordnanceâ— and one of her privy Councell Sr Thomas Daviâ—s of the Citty of London Knight Ld. Maior thereof Anno 1677. Sr. William Prichard of the Citty of London Kt. and Alderman now maried to Sarah daughter of Francis
to the party for so it is termed in Brook's Title Additions 44. but an Honour to the Kingdom And therefore it hath been an ancient Prerogative of the Kings of this Realm at their pleasure to compel men of worth to take upon them that Degree upon payment of a Fine But we see by Experience in these days that none are compelled thereunto and that is the reason wherefore if the Plaintiff be Knighted having the Writ it shall abate because he hath changed his name and that by his own Act. And for that cause also by the Common Law not only the King but every Lord of a Mannor ought to have of every of his Tenants a reasonable Aid to make his eldest Son a Knight And all Lands are subject to these Aids except only ancient Demesne and grand and petty Serjeanty-Tenures as the Law hath â—een anciently delivered And in Io. Shelden 131. where also it is said one that wrote a little after the Statute of Westminster the first allows as a good barr to the Avowry for the Tenant to plead that the Father himself is no Knight so that one not Knighted cannot claim this Ayd of his Tenants Briâ—an cap. de prices de avers And it was at the liberty of the Lord to make more or less of his Tenants by the Common Law in this Case but by the Statute of Westminster the first Chap. 35. it is put in contrary viz. forasmuch as before this time reasonable Aid to make ones Son Knight or to marry his Daughter was never put in certain nor how much should be taken nor at what time whereby some levied unreasonable Aid and more often than seemed necessary whereby the people were sore grieved It is provided that from henceforth of a whole Knight's Fee there be taken but Twenty shillings and of Twenty pounds in Land holden in Soccage Twenty shillings and of more more and of less less after that rate And that none shall levy such Aid to make his Son a Knight until his Son be of fifteen years old nor to marry his Daughter until she be of the Age of seven years And of that there shall be mention made in the King's Writs formed on the same when any will demand it And if it happen that the Father after he hath levied such Aid of his Tenants die before he hath married his Daughter the Executors of the Father shall be bound to the Daughter for so much as the Father received for the Aid And if the Father's Goods be not sufficient his Heir shall be charged therewith unto the Daugher And this Aid is so incident that although the Lord do confirm unto the Tenant to hold by Fealty and certain Rent and release unto him all other Services and Demands yet shall he have the Aid to make his eldest Son a Knight But the King was not bound by the Statute aforementioned because the King was not named in the Statute Therefore by the Statute 25 Edw. 3. chap. 11. the King's Aid were brought to a like value The intention of the Law is That an Heir until the Age of One and twenty years is not able to do Knights Service But such a presumption of Law doth give place to a Judgment of proof to the contrary as Bracton saith Sâ—abitur presumptioni donec probetur in contrarium And therefore when the King who is the Sovereign Judge of all Chivalry hath dubbed him a Knight he by this hath adjudged him able to do him Knight's Service and all men are concluded to say the contrary to it And therefore such an Heir being made a Knight either in the life time of his Father or afterwards during his minority shall be out of Ward and Custody both for his Land and Body and marriage by the Award of the ancient Common Law By reason also that the Honour of Knighthood is so great that it is not to be holden under by any yet if the King do create such an Heir within Age a Duke Marquess Earl Viscount or â—aron by this he shall not be out of Ward and Custody both for his Land and Body And therefore it is propounded by the Statute of Magna Charta chap. 3. Ita tamen quod si ipse dum infra aetatem fuerit fiat miles nihilominus terra remaneat in Custodia Dominorum suorum So that although such an Heir within Age be made Knight and thereby to this purpose is esteemed as of full Age yet the Land shall remain in Custody of the Lord till his Age of One and twenty years by the purview of the said Act. Question If the Son and Heir of the Tenant of the King by Knights Service c. be made Knight in Paris by the French King whether he shall be out of Wardship after the death of his Father or no for thereby he is a Knight in England Coke's seventh part b. 2 Edw. 4. fol. tamen vide in Coke's sixth part 74. b. mention is only made of Knights made by the King himself or by his Lieutenant in Ireland But when the King doth make an Heir apparent within Age of a Tenant by Knights Service a Knight in the life of his Ancestor and after the death of his Ancestor the said Heir being within Age shall in this Case be out of Ward and shall pay no value for his marriage neither shall the Lord have the Custody of the Land for in that Case by the making of him Knight in the life of his Ancestor he is made of full Age so that when his Ancestor dieth no interest either in the Body or in the Land shall invest in the Lord but the Knight may tender his Livery as if he were of full Age And in that case the King shall have primier Seisin as if he had been One and twenty years of Age at the time of the death of his Ancestor and not otherwise For the Statute of Magna Charta doth not extend unto it for the purview of it doth extend only when the Heir in Ward infra aetatem is made Knight then remanet terra in Custodia c. But when the Heir is made Knight in the life of his Ancestor then the Custody cannot remain which never had any inception or essence Also when the Heir after the death of his Ancestor within Age is made Knight if after tender made to him he within Age do marry elsewhere yet he shall not pay the forfeiture of his marriage for by the making him Knight he is out of Ward and Custody of his Lord for then he ought to be sui Iuris and may imploy himself in feats of Arms for defence of the Realm c. and therefore may not be within the Custody of another and none shall pay any forfeiture but when after any refusal he doth marry himself during the time when he is under the custody and keeping of his Lord And this doth appear by the Statute of Merton chap. 6. Si se mariturierit sine licentia
Analogia Honorum OR A TREATISE OF Honour and Nobility According to the LAWS and CUSTOMES OF ENGLAND Collected out of the most Authentick Authors both Ancient and Modern In Two Parts THE FIRST Containing Honour Military and relateth to War THE SECOND Honour Civil and relateth to Court and City Illustrated with variety of SCULPTURES sutable to the several Subjects LONDON Printed by Tho. Roycroft Anno Dom. MDCLXXVII To the Right Noble Iames Duke of Monmouth and Buccleuth Earle of Doncaster and Dâ— Lord Scott of Askdale Tendale and Wichester Lord high Chamberlaine of Scotland cheifeâ—y and Iustice in Eyre of all his Matys Parks Chaces and Forests on the South side of Trent L d Lâ—â— of the County and Steward of the Towne of Stafford Lord Leivtenant of the East Rideing of York shire Governor of the Towne and Citadel of Kingston upon Hull Chancellor of â— University of Cambridge Master of the Horse to his Maty Captaine of his Matys Guard of Hâ—â— Knight of the Garter Captaine Generall of his Matys land Forces and one of â— Lords of his Matys most Honourable privy Councell c a. This Plate with the Treatise of Honor Military and Civill is in all Humility dedicated to your Grace by mâ— your Graces most Submissive Servant Richard Blome HONI SOIT QVI MAL Y PENSE THE FIRST PART OR Honour Military CHAP. I. ALL Honours may not improperly be said to receive their Birth either from the City Court or Camp which of all is esteemed the most worthy and honourable raising some to Imperial and Princely Dignities and disthroning others And in all Kingdoms even amongst the barbarous Americans War hath ever been and yet is held in high esteem and of great Importance as well for the preservation of their Laws and Rights as for the defence of their Dominions for which War is permitted by the Laws of God is taught by the Laws of Nature and commanded by the Laws of Nations And to excite men to valour and noble Atchievments Reward or Honours is conferred upon such that merits the same according to their Deserts for the defence of holy Church their King and Country War being therefore of such concern it behoveth every prudent Prince for the welfare of his People to be always prepared for Peace or War either Offensive or Defensive both for Forreign Invasion or the suppressing Domestick Insurrections wherefore it hath been found expedient to joyn good Laws the Friends of Peace and Rest unto Arms War being always accompanied with men of audacious and furious Spirits Iustinianus for the uniting of Laws and Arms appointed one Officer called a Praetor to command both Martially and Civilly which Name the Romans continued for their General of War and by his Office had Authority both Martial and Civil By which it appears that War cannot endure without the assistance of Law and wise men in former Ages did hold that Prudence and Power ought not to be separated of which Opinion was Horace saying Vis expers consilii mole ruit sua Likewise for the same reason learned Writers were induced to commend valiant Captains and wise Counsellors as it were joyntly and in one rank for with Simonides they joyned Pausanias with Craesus Solon and with Pericles Anaxagoras Of War and the Causes thereof DIscord is common to all men and that occasioned either by Revenge for Injuries done out of covetousness in gaining that which belongs to others for ambition in gainning Fame by noble Victories or such like Reasons and this maketh one City to wage war against another one Province to invade another and whole Kingdoms to oppress one another even to a Conquest if they can Aristotle proveth that some men by nature are born to Command and others to Obey by which it appears that War is necessary as well to compel those to Obedience as the others to hold their Authority The Romans did sometimes judge it convenient to make War only to train up their Youth fit for Service and to keep them from idleness which breedeth Intemperance and Dishonesty And by Action Princes that are martially inclined have not only gained Renown but also much enlarged their Dominions Yet I am of the Opinion That War ought not to be made without just cause and when the Enemy cannot be perswaded to reason by Embassadors prudent Princes and Commanders do not wage War unadvisedly and when they do they should follow the Example of Trajanus who observed these Cautions to be careful to supply the places of his slain Souldiers to repress the enemies pride and according to Military Discipline constrain Mutiners to Obedience and Order Of Souldiers SOuldiers or men professing Arms according to Vlpianus were called Milites à malitia id est duritia that is were so named in respect of the hardness and danger they endure in defence of other people or because they keep off the injuries which enemies do offer He that desireth to enjoy the Honour belonging to Arms ought first to prove himself a Souldier which by the Civil Laws may be done three ways the first is by Certificate from the Captain or Officers secondly he ought to make proof of his experience and manhood in Martial Affairs and thirdly to be registred in the List of received Souldiers and none other properly ought to be termed Souldiers By ancient Custom Souldiers always took an Oath not to abandon their Captain or Camp not to commit Treason nor consult with one another privately to cause mutining and the like Martianus the great Doctor did reject Bondmen as persons unfit and unworthy to be called Souldiers and no person that hath committed any infamous Crime of which he is convicted ought afterwards to bear Arms so honourable is the Name and Dignity of a Souldier The persons excused from bearing Arms are Priests and all in Holy Orders all Graduates in Schools all men above the Age of 60 years and those under the Age of 17 years Those Souldiers that had long served the Romans either in their Legion or elsewhere and deported themselves obediently to their Officers and honestly to all men were called Veterani and had great favour shewed them and that when any Veteran had honestly served them the space of twenty years he was then called Emeritus and might have his dismission to end his days in peace and quietness with the enjoyment of divers Immunities besides signal marks of Honour according to their merit which was a great encouragement to Youth to be trained up in Military Service which oft-times they made use of appointing Tutors to instruct them therein and these they called Tyrones And as on the one hand the Romans rewarded them for good Service so on the other they inflicted punishments according to the heinousness of the Offence as for Treason Disobedience Abandoning their Colours and Assisting the Enemy also for Theft Murther and Cowardise which they esteemed most vile The experience of which was seen when Spractacus defeated the Romans conducted by
That he hath appeared magnanimous in Campaigns Leguers Battels and Seiges by Land in the most furious and dreadful Sea fights in which he hath given life to some Enemies and taken it from others His escaping such Hazards and passing by Domestick Broyls with a Princely Scorn would half perswade a credulous person that he had evaded the time of dying and that for the World 's general good it were decreed he should endure as long as the Sun and Moon to support the Grandure of the Brittish Monarchy in the Person of his Sacred Majesty King Charles the Second and his lawful Successors The Effiges of the Right Noble George late Duke of ALBEMARLE Earle of Torrington Baron Moncke of Potheridgeâ— Beauchamp and Teys Knight of the Noble order of the Garter Lord Leiutenant of Devonshire Captaine Generall of all his Majestyes Land Forces Ioynt Admirall with his Highness Prince Rupert in the last Dutch Warrâ— one of the Lords Comissioners of his Majestys Treasuryâ— one of the Gentlemen of his Bedchamber one of the Lds of his most honble privy Councell c a. Edw. Le Davis sculp Thus in a Victor's Garland oft we see Laurels with Cypress intermixed be But I could lose my self in the Admiration of these Objects were I not again surprized by the late Generous and Noble Exploits of the Heroick Prince Iames Duke oâ— Monmouth whose brave Spirit disdaining to be confined to the ease of a Court life contemning the soft pleasures of Peace seeks out Dangers abroad makes Bellona his Mistress deâ—ies death in his ascent to Honour and thus immortalizes his Name throughout Christendome by his Valour and Conduct at Mastricht in Anno 1673. To affect Glory in Youth is becoming a Royal Birth and to begin with Victory is a happy Omen of Future Success In a long progress of time a Coward may become a Conquerour Some others from mean Adventures passing through gross Errors grow to Experience and in time perform great Exploits But as there are few Rivers Navigable from their first Fountain so are such Men doubtless very rare and singular who have not any need either of growth or years nor are subject either to the Order of Times or Rules of Nature Proceed brave Prince in the path you have so fairly traced out and let the World see your renowned Valour Of a lower Orb we may justly boast of our English Fabius General Monk who so wisely wearied out Lambert by his delays and cajoled the rebellious Rump Parliament He was a Person of great Valour Experience and Prudence whose Loyalty and Conduct hath given him a never dying Fame to be celebrated by the Pens and Tongues of all good Subjects whilst the Name of Britain lasteth His Exploits were truly great his Success in his Conduct renowned with too many Victories to be here inserted Let it suffice to say he was bred a Souldier and after the many risks of Fortune got the Art to mannage that fickle Lady so well that he triumphed over his Foes both in War and Peace acted the part of a good Politician the trusty old Cushai confounding the Counsel of Achitophel to preserve his Royal Master and was the blessed Instrument of his Majestie 's most happy Restauration to his Crown and Dignity and the Kingdom to its pristine Laws and Liberties securing to himself and Posterity that well purchased Title of the most High Potent and Noble Prince George Duke of Albemarle Earl of Torrington Baron Monk of Potheridge Beauchamp and Teys besides which Hereditary Titles he was Knight of the Noble Order of the Garter one of his Majesties most Honourable Privy Council and Captain General of all his Majesties Forces during life an Honour and Office scarce ever before intrusted in the hands of a Subject in times of Peace He lived the darling of his Country dearly beloved of his Majesty and all the Royal Stem and dreadful to our Forreign and Home-bred Foes but laden with Love Honour and Years He yielded up his Life to the Hands of him that gave it and departed in peace the Third Day of Ianuary Anno Dom. 16 69 70. lamented by all good Subjects Post funera Virtus We have many more that by Experience and Conquest are very well known to be eminent Warriers whose Noble Acts were enough to fill large Volumes and whose worthy Atchievements will be recorded in the Histories of that Age for an Encouragement to Posterity the Effigies of some of which I have here lively represented to your View The Effigies of ye. Right honble Charles Earle of CARLISLE Viscount Morpeth Baron Dacres of Gillsland Lord Leiutenant of Cumberland Westmoreland Vice Admirall of ye. Countyes of Northâ—mberland Camberland Westmoreland the Bishoprick of Durham The Towne County of Newcastle Maritin parts There adiacent one of his Matyes most honble priuy Councell c a Abra. Blâ—thing sculp The Effiges of the Right honble William Earle of Craven Viscount Craven of Vffington Baron Craven of Hampsted-Marshall Lord Leiutenant of the County of Middlesex and Borough of Southwarke and one of the Lords of his Majestys most honble privy Councell ca. This Portraiture is in memory of Bertram Ashburnham of Ashburnham in Sussex who in the tyme of King Harold was Warden of the Cinqueports Constable of Dover and Sheriff of the said County and being a person in soe great power at the Landing of William the Congueror King Harold who was then in the North sent him a Letter to raise all the force under his Comand to withstand the Invador And when the King camâ— vp to oppose yâ— Conqueror the said Bertram who had an eminent Comand in the Battle received soe many wounds that soon after he dyed thereof And since which tyme through the mercy of god the Said family in a direct male line have euer since continued at Ashburnham aforesaid and are the present possessors thereof Edw Le Davis Sculp THE SECOND PART OR Honour Civil AND Treateth of the Nobility and Gentry according to the Laws and Customes of England CHAP. I. Of Honour General and Particular HONOUR is the Reward of Vertue as Infamy the Recompence of Vice and he that desireth to mount her footsteps as naturally all men in some degree or other are addicted unto must arrive thereunto by the way of Vertue which was strictly observed by the Romans for Dignities by Birth were not enough to advance them thereunto if they were not endowed with Heroick and Vertuous Qualifications and Honour should be a Testimony of their Excellency therein Some Learned Writers say That Honour consisteth in exterior Signs and Aristotle calleth it Maximum bonorum exteriorum Others say it is a certain Reverence in Testimony of Vertue Honour is of greater esteem than Silver or Gold and ought to be prized above all Earthly Treasure And for the encouragement of Youth to vertuous Atchievements the Romans were no more slack in their Rewards and Badges of Honour than they were in their punishment
it doth appear By which Statute three things were ordained First The County Palatine of Lancaster was again established Secondly He did invest it in the Body Politick of the King 's of this Realm And thirdly He did divide it from the order of the Crown Land And in this form it continued until Henry the Seventh who forthwith being descended from the House of Lancaster did separate it only in Order and Government from the Crown and so it continueth at this day Ceremonies to be observed in the Creation of a Duke AT the Creation of a Duke he must have on him his Surcoat and Hood and should be led between two Dukes if there be any present if not a Marquiss or two and for want of either an Earl somewhat before him on the right hand shall go on Earl which shall bear a Cap of Estate with the Coronet in it and on the other side shall also go an Earl which shall bear the Golden Rod and before the Duke that is to be created should go a Marquiss or one of the greatest Estate to bear the Sword and before him an Earl to bear the Mantle or Robe of Estate lying on his Arms. And all these Nobles that do Service must be in their Robes of Estate His Title is proclaimed twice and the Largess thrice The Effigies of the most Noble CHARLES PAULET MARQUESS of WINCHESTER EARLE of Wiltsh And BARON St. IOHN of Basing ct. R. White Sculp The most honble Charles Paulet Marâ—quess of Minchester Earle of Miltshire Baron St Iohn of Basing â— The most honble Henry Somersetâ— Marquess Earle of Worcestâ—â—â— Ld. Herâ—ert Baron of Chipstom Raglan Gomer Ld. President â— Ldâ— Leivtenant of Wales and the Marches L d Leivtenant of 〈◊〉 Countyes of Glocester Hereford Monmouth of the 〈◊〉 County of Bristoll Knight of the most noble order of the Gâ—â—teâ— one of the Lords of his matys most honble privy Councâ—llâ— The most hono rble Henry Rerrepont Marquâ—ss of Dorchester Earle of Kingston upon Hullâ— Viscount Nemarke Ld. Rerrepont Maunvers Herris one of the Lords of his matys most honorbleâ— Priuy Councel câ— OF MARQUISSES CHAP. V. A Marquiss which by the Saxons is called Marken-Reue and signifieth a Governor or Ruler of the Marches hath the next place of Honour to a Duke This Title came to us but of late days for the first was Robert Vere who was created Marquiss of Dublin by King Richard the Second and from that time it became to be a Title of Honour for in former time those that Governed the Marches were commonly called Lord Marchers and not Marquisses After the Normans had conquered this Land it was by them carefully observed as a matter of great moment to place upon the Confines and Borders of the Britains and those not then subdued men of much Valour such that were not only sufficient to encounter the Inrodes and Invasions of the Enemy but also ready upon all Occasions to make onset upon them for the enlarging their Conquest These men thus placed were of high Blood and Reputation amongst their Countrey-men the Normans and in whose Faith the Conqueror reposed special Trust and Confidence And therefore in their Territories given unto them to hold their Tenures were devised to be very special and of great importance and honour enriched with Name and Priviledges of Earl of Chester and so the North-border of Wales created to a County Palatine and the Barons of the middle part of the South Marches were adorned in a manner with a Palatine Jurisdiction having a Court of Chancery and Writs only amongst themselves pleadable to the intent that their Attendance might not thence be drawn for the prosecuting of Controversies or Quarrels in the Law And as for the other part of the South Marches they seemed to be sufficiently fenced with the River Severn and the Sea A Marquiss is created per gladii cincturam circuli aurei suo capiti positionem He is honoured with a Coronet of Gold which is part flowered and part pyramidal with the points and flowers or leaves of an equal height His Mantle is doubled Ermin which is of three doublings and an half whereas the Mantle of an Earl is but of three and the doublings of a Viscount's Mantle is but two and a half which are only plain white Furr without Ermins as are the Barons which are but of two doublings The form of their Patent which at their Creation is delivered into their hands was various but of late â—tis regulated to the method of those of other Degrees and the Ceremonies the same This Honour is hereditary and the eldest Son by the Courtesie of the Land is called Earl or Lord of a place and the younger Sons only Lord Iohn Lord Thomas or the like He hath the Title of most Noble most Honourable and Potent Prince and may have his Cloth of Estate reaching within a yard of the Ground the King or a Duke not being present and his Marchioness may have her Train born up by a Knight's Lady in her own House but not in a Dutchesses presence A Marquisses eldest Son is born an Earl and shall go as an Earl and have his Essay in an Earl's presence and wear as many powdrings as an Earl but shall give place to an Earl and his Wife shall go beneath a Countess and abovâ— all Marquisses Daughters who are born Ladies and the eldest a Countess but shall go beneath a Countess At the Creation of a Marquiss he must have on him his Surcoat and Hood and be led by a Duke or Marquiss the Sword and Cap to be born by Earls He must go after his Creation not after his Marquisite and the Marchioness his Wife according to the same The Effigies of the Right honble CHARLES BEAUCLAIRE Baron of Heddington Earle of BURFORD And of ye. Rt. honble IAMES Ld. BEAUCLAIRE Brother and heir to ye. Right honble Charles Earle of Burford The Rt. honble Aubrey Vere Earle of Oxfordâ— Baron Bulbeck Sandford Badlefinere Kt. of the Garter L Leiutenant wth his grace the Duke of â—â—â—â—marle of Essex one of his Maâ—ysâ— most Hon. privy Councell c a. The Right Honourable Charles Talbot Earle of Shrewsbury Baron Talbot Strange of Blackmere Gifford of Brimshelâ— Purnivullâ— Verdon Lovetoâ— The Right Honourable Anthony Grey Earle of Kent Baron Grey of Ruthin Hasting and Valance 〈◊〉 Right honble William Stanley Earleâ— of Derâ—â— Lord Stanley c Strange of Knocking Viscount Kintâ—â— Baron of Weâ—â—on L â— Mobâ—n Burnet Basset Lacy. L â— Leivtâ—nant of Lancâ—shire â— Cheshire and Admirall of the Seas theirâ— belonging Câ—amberlaine of Châ—ster â— L â— of Man as of the Isles c a. The Right honble Iohn Mannors Earle of Rutland Baron Ross of Hamlack Trushut and Belvior and Lord Leivetenant of Leicestershire The Right honble Theophilus Earle of Huntington L d Hastings of Hastings Hungerford Homet Botreaux Moules Moulins Peâ—erell
his matys most honble privy Councell for England Ireland câ—â— The Right honble Iohn Earle of Bath Viscount â—renvile of Lonsdowne Baron Greenvile of Kilkhampton Bidiford L â— Warden of the Stanneries high Steward of the Dutchy of Cornwall Ld. Leivetenant of Cornwall Governour of Plymouth Groom of the Stoole first Gent. of his matys Bedchamber and one of his Ma â—â— privy Councell câ—t. The Right honble Charles Howard Earle of Carlisle Viscount Morpeth Baron Dacres of Gisland Lord Leivtenant of Cumberland and Westmorland Vice Admirall of the Coast of Northumberland Cumberland Westmoreland Bishoprick of Durham Towne and County of New castle and Maritin parts adjacent and one of the Lords of his Maties most honble privy Councell câ—t The Right honble William Earle of Craven Viscount Craven of Vffington Baron Craven of Hampsted-Marshall Lord Leivtenant of the County of Middâ—x and Borough of Southwark one of the Lords of his Mtys most honble privy Councell câ—t The Right honble Robert Bruce Earle of Alisbury Elgin Viscount Bruce of Ampthill Baron Bruce of Whorâ—â—on Skelton Kinloss Hereditary High Steward of the Honour of Ampâ—hiâ—â— Lord Leivtenant of the County of Bedford and High Steward of Leicester ct. The Right honble Richard Boyle Earle of Burlington Baron Clifford of Lansborow in Englandâ— Earle of Corke Viscount Dungarvan Baron Yaughalâ— and Lord High Trâ—asurer of Ireland â— â— The Right honble Henry Bennet Earle and Baron of Arlington Viscount Thetford Knight of the most noble order of the Garter Lord Chamberlaine of his matys Household and one of the Lords of his most honble Councel ct. The Right honble Anthony Earle of Shaâ—tesbury Baron Ashley of Wimbourne St. Giles and Lord Cooper of Pawleâ— The Right honble Henry Howard â—arle of Norwich Earle Marshall of England Baron Howard of Castle Riseing Now Duke of Norfolkâ— see in the Catalogue of Duâ—es The Right Honourable William Herbert Earle and Baron of Powis ◠〈◊〉 Right Honourable Edward Henry 〈◊〉 of Litchfield Viscount Quarenton â—â—d Baron Spilsbury The Rt. Noble Iohn Maitland Earle of Guilford and Baron of Petersham in England Duke of Latherdale Viscount Maitland Baron of Thirleston Miescleborougâ— and Bolton in Scotland Ld. Comissioner for his present Ma â—y of that Kingdome Kt. of the Garter Gentlemâ—â— of the Bedchamber and one of his matys most honble privy Councell for the Kingdomes of England Irelandâ— The Right honble Chaâ—les Fitz-Charles Earle of Plymouth Viscount Totnes and Baron Dartmouth The Right Honourable Thomas Osborne Earle of Danby Viscount Latimer Baron Osborne of Kiveton Viscount Osborne of Danblaine in Scotland Kt. of the most noble order of the Garter â— L d high Treasurer of Englandâ— ctâ— The Right Honourable George Fitz Roy Earle of Northumberland Viscount Falmouth and Baron Ponteâ—fract c a. The Right Honourable Thomas Leonard Earle of Sussex and Lord Dacres of Giles land c a. The R t Honourable Lovis Earle of Feversham Viscount Sondes Lord Duras Baron of Holdenby and Throwley Captaine of his Royall Highness Troop of his matys Guards Leivtenant Geneâ—rall of his Maties forces and Collonell of his matys owne Royall Regiment of Dragoons The Right Honourable Charles Beauclair Baron of Heddington and Earle of Burford The Right honble William Oâ—Brien Earle Baron of Insiâ—uin Baron of Burren in the Kingdome of Ireland Captaine Generall of his matys Forces in Affrica Gouernor of the Royoll Citty of Tanger vice Admirall of the same and of the parts adjacent and one of his Mat ys most honble privy Councell for the Sd. Kingdom of Ireland The Right Honourable Charles Moore Earle and Viscount of Drogheda and Baron of Mellefont in the Kingdom of Ireland c a. The Ri t honble Luke Plunkett Earle of Fingall and Baron of Killeene in the Kingdome of Ireland c a. The Rtâ— Honerable Sr. Arthur Chichester Kt Baron of Belfast Vist. Chichester of Carikfergus Earle of Donegall in ye. Kingdom of Ireland Gouernor of Carikfergus ye. Teritoryes Therâ—â—â—â— Belonging one of his mat ys Most Hoâ—â—◠〈◊〉 Councell for ye. S â— Kingdom The Rt. honble Iames Ogilby Earle of Airly Elight and Glentrahen in the Kingdome of Scotland c a. The Right Honourable Iohn Fitz Gerard Earle of Kildeare primier Earle of the Kingdome of Ireland c a. The Right Honourable William Pope Earle of Downe Baron and Lord Pope of Bellterbitt in Ireland c a. The Rt. honble Roger Palmer Earle of Castlemaine and Baron of Lamberick in the Kingdome of Ireland c a. OF EARLES CHAP. VI. THE next Degree of Honour is an Earl which Word and Title came from the Saxons For it is observed That originally within this Realm in the ancient English-Saxon Government Earldomes of Counties were not only Dignities of Honour but Offices of Justice having the charge and custody of the County whereof they were Earls and for their Assistance had their Deputy called Vicecomes which Office is now managed by Sheriffs each County having his Sheriff Annually chosen out of the eminent Inhabitants thereof under the Degree of Nobiles Majores And the Earls in recompence of their Travels concerning the Affairs of the County then received a Salary viz. a third peny of the Profits of the County which Custome continued a long time after the Conquest and was inserted as a Princely Benevolence in their Patents of Creation as by divers ancient Patents may appear which afterwards were turned into Pensions for the better support of that Honour as appeareth by a Book-Case 32 Hen. 6. 28. And therefore in respect of such Pensions or such other Gratuities given in lieu thereof some men have not without probability thereof imagined quod Comites nominabantur quia à multis fisci Regii socii Comites eidem participes essent The word Earl by the Saxons was called Erlig or Ethling by the Germans Graves as Lantgrave Palsgrave Margrave Rheingrave and the like and by the Dutch was called Eorle But upon the coming in of the Normans they were called Comes or Comites that is Counts and for Gravity in Council they are called Comes Illustris a Comitando Principem And as Earls for their Vertues and Heroical Qualities are reputed Princes or Companions for Princes so ought they to deport themselves answerable to the said Dignity as well in their Attendance and Noble House-keeping as otherwise The Dignity of Earl is of divers kinds and is either local or personal Local as from the denomination of some place and Personal as being in some great Office as Earl-Marshal and the like Those Local are also Palatine and Simplices Those that are Palatine or Count Palatine are Chester Lancaster and the Bishopricks of Durham and Ely and retain some of the ancient Priviledges allowed them by the Saxons Hugh Lupus who was the first Hereditary Earl had the County Palatine of Chester given him by the Conqueror who governed it
Adversaries in this manner viz. The Writ of Summons to the Parliament whereby the Baron by Writ hath his Original is to call that Honourable and Worthy Person so summoned to the number of that Right High and Honourable Assembly and to be a Judge to sit hear and determine Life and Member Plea and right of Land if there shall come occasion likewise to give Counsel and Advise in the most mighty Affairs of the Realm But these things are convenient for the quality and condition of men unfitting and altogether unbeseeming the Sex of women Ergo having respect unto the scope and final purpose of such Writs such Inheritances should only descend unto the Heir Female The Second Argument contra Secondly If it shall be answered That although the Heir Female to whom such Inheritance is descended be unfit in her own person for the accomplishing of these things yet she may marry with one sufficiently able for her and in her behalf to execute the same This Answer will neither satisfie nor salve the inconveniences For admit that such an Heir Female were at full Age at the death of her Ancestor unmarried for it doth lye in her own choice then whom shall be her Husband The Third Argument contra Thirdly If such Husband shall be called by the right of his Wife the Writ shall make some mention thereof for otherwise it may well be taken that the Husband was chosen in his own person and in behalf of himself and not in regard of his wife or such pretended Dignity descended unto him But there was never such a Writ of Summons seen wherein the wife was mentioned And if the husband of such a wife have been called to the Parliament which is always by General Writ not mentioning his wife he is thereby made a Baron of himself by virtue of the said Writ Having thus heard both sides to dispute place it doth now require to interpose Opinion to compound the Controversie This point in queâ—tion is somewhat perplexed by means of difficult Presidents For first it is observed That some Presidents do prove that Baronies by Writ have descended unto Heirs Female whose husbands have been called to Parliament whether in regard of themselves or in respect of their wives right it maketh no matter but since it is that the marriage of such Ladies gave that occasion to be summoned and such husbands and their Poâ—â—erity have and do lawfully bear the same Title of Dignity which the Ancestors of such a wife did before rightfully bear For by this Controversie theâ—e is no purpose to call the right of such Noble Houses into question Howbeit Secondly this is to be observed out of the Presidents and to be acknowledged of every dutiful Subject That the King's Majesty is nevertheless at liberty to call to his High Council of Parliament whom he shall in his Princely Wisdom think fit which by his Majestie 's Noble Progenitors have in former Ages likewise observed And therefore whereas Ralph Lord Cromwell being a Baron by Writ died without Issue having two Sisters and Coheirs Elizabeth the eldest who married Sir Thomas Nevile Knight and Ioan the younger who married Sir Humphrey Butcher Knight who was called to Parliament as Lord Cromwell and not the said Sir Thomas Thirdly It is to be observed That if a Baron by Writ die without Heir Male having his Daughter Sister or other Collateral Heir Male that can challenge the Land of the said Baron deceased by any ancient entail or otherwise the Title of such an Heir Female hath heretofore been allowed as by the honourable Opinions and Relations of the Right Honourable the late Commissioners in the Office of Earl-Marshal signified unto the late Queen upon Petition of the Sister and Heir of Gregory Lord Dacres deceased may appear Moreover in the same Pedigree of the Lord Dacres it was expressed That Thomas sometimes Lord Dacres had issue Thomas his eldest Son Ralph his Second and Humphrey his third Thomas the eldest died in the life of his Father having issue Ioan Daughter and Heir who was married to Sir Richard Fines Knight and after Thomas Lord Dacres his Grandfather and Father to the said Ralph and Humphrey died after whose death Henry the Sixth by his Letters Patents bearing date at Westminster the Seventh of November in the Seventh year of his Reign reciting the said Pedigree and Marriage doth by his said Letters Patents accept declare and repute the said Richard Fines to be Lord Dacres and one of the Barons of the Realm But afterwards in the time of Edward the Fourth the said Humphrey Dacres after the attainder of the said Ralph and himself by an Act of Parliament which was the first of Edward the Fourth And after the death of the said Ralph and the Reversal of the said Act by another Act in the Twelfth of Edward the Fourth the said Humphrey made challenge unto the said Barony and unto divers Lands of the said Thomas his Father whereupon both parties after their Title had been considered of in Parliament submitted themselves to the Arbitrement of King Edward the Fourth and entred into Bond each to other for the performance thereof whereupon the said King in his Award under his Privy Seal bearing date at Westminster the Eighth of April Anno Regni sui decimo tertio did Award that the said Richard Fines in the right of Ioan his wife and the Heirs of his body by the said Ioan begotten should keep have and use the same Seat and Place in every Parliament as the said Thomas Dacres Knight Lord Dacres had used and kept and that the Heirs of the body of the said Thomas Dacres Knight then late Lord Dacres begotten should have and hold to them and to their Heirs the Mannor of Holbeach And further That the said King Edward did Award on the other part that the said Humphrey Dacres Knight and the Heirs Males of the said Thomas late Lord Dacres should be reputed had named and called the Lord Dacres of Gillesland and that he and the Heirs Males of the body of the said Thomas then late Lord Dacres should have use and keep the place in Parliament next adjoyning beneath the said place which the said Richard Fines Knight Lord Dacres then had and occupied And that the Heirs of the body of the said Ioan his wife shall have and enjoy and that the Heirs Males of the said Thomas Dacres late Lord Dacres should have to them and the Heirs Males of their bodies begotten the Mannor of Iothington c. And so note that the name of the ancient Barony namely Gillesland remained unto the Heir Male to whom the Land was entailed Moreover this is specially observed If any Baron by Writ do die having no other Issue than Female and that by some special entail or other assurance there be an Heir Male which doth enjoy all or great part of the Lands Possessions and Inheritances of such Baron deceased the Kings have used to call to the
Nobleman and his Progenitors have for a long time been called to Parliament and be a Baron either by Tenure or Writ and have had in regard thereof a place certain in Parliament if afterwards the said Nobleman should be created a Baron of that Barony and by the same name by Letters Patents whether shall he and his Heirs retain his old place in Parliament which he had according to his former Dignity or whether shall he lose his old place and take a new one according to the time of his Creation Answer The Case of the Lord Delaware lately erected a Resolution somewhat answerable to this Question Thomas Delaware in the third of Edward the Sixth being in some displeasure with William West his Heir and Nephew who was Father to Thomas late Lord Delaware and Grandfather to Henry Lord Delaware that Nevis procured by Act of Parliament by which the said William West was during his natural life only clearly disabled to claim demand or have any manner of Right Title or Interest by Descent Remainder or otherwise in or to the Mannors Lands Tenements or Hereditaments Title and Dignity of Thomas Lord Delaware his Uncle c. After the said Thomas Delaware died and the said William West was in the time of Queen Mary attainted of Treason by Verdict but pardoned by the said Queen and afterwards by Parliament in the time of Queen Elixabeth was restored and in the fourth year of her Reign was created Lord Delaware by Patent and took place in Parliament accordingly for that by the said Act of Parliament of Edward the Sixth he was excluded to challenge the former ancient Barony and after he died Now whether Thomas Delaware should take his place according to the ancient Barony by Writ or according to his Father's Creation by Patent was the Question The Opinions of the late Queens Council being his Majestie 's Attorney General and Solicitor were That the acceptance of the new Creation by the said William West could not extinguish the ancient Dignity for that he had not the ancient Dignity in him at that time of his Creation but the Dignity was by the Act of Parliament 3 Edw. 6. in the ballance of suspence or consideration of Law and he thereby utterly disabled to have the same during his life only so as other acceptance could not extinguish that Dignity which he then had not nor could not conclude his Heir who was not disabled by the Parliament 3 Edw. 6. to claim the ancient Barony which Opinion of theirs was seen and allowed by the then Chief Justice of England and Lord Chief Baron and so signified to the Lord Keeper But this to be noted by the Reasons made for the said Resolution though if the said Sir William West had been Baron and entituled and in possession of the ancient Dignity when he accepted the ancient Creation the Law perchance might have been otherwise but that remains as yet unresolved Nevertheless the Rule is Eodem modo quo quid constituitur dissolvitur But by a Grant which is but a matter of Fact a man cannot transfer his Title of Honour And thus much concerning the Degrees of Barons within this Realm upon this occasion for the better understanding and direction of that which followeth to be handled And in this place I think it not impertinent to mention one Case which I met with in our Books of Common Law concerning the Descent of a Title of Honour whereof the Ancestor had Estate in Feesimple there is a Maxim in the Law Possessio fratris in feodo facit sororemesse haeredem But if a man by any of the three means aforesaid be created into a Title of Dignity to him and his Heirs for ever and so have Issue by one wife a Son and a Daughter and hath also a Son by a second wife afterwards the Father dieth and his eldest Son entreth into all his Father's Inheritances and also enjoyeth the Titles and Dignities which his Father had but dieth without Issue In this Case the Dignity shall descend upon the younger Son though he be but of the half blood to him that last enjoyed that Name and Title of descent and shall not descend to his Sister of the whole blood And yet in this case he shall only be her Brother's Heir of all his Feesimple Lands and the reason thereof is because possessio fratris is the name and sole cause which may give Title to her his Sister which faileth in this case of Dignity for it cannot be said that her elder brother was in possession of his Title of Honour no more than of his blood so as neither by his own act nor any act to be done by any other did gain more actual possession if so it may be termed then by the Law did descend to him and therefore the younger brother may well by the Law make himself Heir unto his Father of the Honour that he cannot be heir unto his brother So that this word Possession which is no other than pedis positio extendeth only unto such things of which a man may by hâ—s entry or other act be possessed and doth require actual possession Coke's third part 92. Having thus much treated concerning the Creations and other things incident to the degrees of Nobility I cannot omit some things concerning the sufficiency and ability of Estate which the Law doth require to be in every of them according to their several Dignities The Common Law which always will decorum and conveniency be observed considering the Charges and Dignities appertaining to these Degrees and Dignities being Offices of principal Service to the King and Realm both in War and Peace hath ordered that each of them ought to have a convenient Portion and Inheritance in Land to support the said Dignity which Supplies are as Sinews conjoyned in the same For in Vertue and Riches as Aristotle confesseth all the old Nobility consisted and which two Properties maketh a good Complement for utilior est sapientia cum divitiis conjuncta Therefore a Knight's Fee which he ought to have is Twenty pounds Land by the year a Baron's thirteen Knights Fees and a quarter and an Earl's twenty Knights Fees For always the fourth part of each Revenues which is by the Law held requisite for the Dignity shall be paid to the King for the Relief As for Example the Relief of a Knight is five pounds which is the one fourth of his Revenue according to the Statute of the first of Edward the Second The Relief of a Baron is One hundred Marks which is also the fourth part of his Revenue And the Relief of an Earl is One hundred pounds alâ—o the fourth part of his Revenue And it appears by the Records of the Exchequer that the Relief of a Duke amounteth unto Three hundred pounds And this is the reason in our Books that every of the Nobility is presumed in the Law to have sufficient Freehold ad sustinendum nomen onus And to what value
priviledge THE Statute of Westminster 2. cap. 39◠saith If the Sheriff return that he cannot execute the Kings precept propter resistentiam alicujus magnatis if it be true he shall punish the resisters by Imprisonment from whence they shall not be delivered without the Kings special commandment In 11 Hen. 4. 15. in homine replegiando against Dame Spencer a Peer of the Realm viz. a Baroness born a Capias was granted because it was an high injury to the person whom she eloigned and in some other cases of great contempt a Capias may be awarded against a Peer An Abbot which was a Lord of the Parliament was impleaded and he did pray priviledge to appear by an Attorney and by the Rule of the Court he could not because the Statute is general and against it but by a special Writ out of Chancery he might and so in case where he doth pray to be received For if a Lord of the Parliament holding Lands of another in Feesimple doth forbear and withhold to do and pay his Service to his Landlord and that by the space of two years whereupon he bringeth a Writ of Cessment which is his Remedy given by Law thereby to recover the Inheritance of the Land But the said Lord for the saving of Tenancy being minded to pay all the Arrearages before Judgment given against him as by the Law he ought to do in this case he must come in proper person and not by an Attorney If a Nobleman be indicted and cannot be found Process of Outlary shall be awarded against him per legem terrae and he shall be outlawed per judicium Coronatorum but he shall be tried per judicium parium suorum when he appeals and pleads to issue If any Lord did depart this Realm as Ambassador and otherwise by the Kings Licence or without Licence and do not return at the King's command or upon the Kings Writ upon his privy Signet the King may seize his Goods and Chattels If a Lord arrested upon a Supplicavit for the peace do refuse to obey the Arrest and make Rescous and the Sheriff do return the Rescous upon such return shall issue an Attachment against the said Lord for his contempt to take his Body and this is a way to obtain the peace against any Lord of the Parliament whereas the party could not have an Attachment against him if the Subpoena had been duly served and peaceably accepted of although the said Lord had not appeared thereupon All Lords are compellable to take the Oath mentioned in the Statute of the 7 th of King Iames chap. 4. And see the Statute of the 7 th of King Iames chap. 6. who have Authority to minister the said Oath unto them If a Baron that holdeth by Baron Tenure have his absence excused by Essoyn he which casteth his Essoyn or Excuse ought to find Surety that the said Essoyn is true But in case of common persons it shall rest upon the Credit and Integrity of the Essoyner wherein a Lord hath lesser priviledge than a common person And whereas the Amercements should be offered per pares the use is to refer them to the Barons of the Exchequer When a Peer of the Realm is Arraigned in any Appeal of Felony he shall not have that priviledge to be tried by his Peers as in case of Indictment but must undergo the ordinary Trial of Twelve men Also in case of Indictment the Defendant though a Peer may not challenge any of his Triers And the Judgment to be given against any Lord of Parliament in cases of Felony or Treason shall be no other than according to the usual Judgment given against common persons And their Execution through the special Grace and Favour of the King is beheading By Attainder of Felony or Treason is corruption of Blood so that their Children may not be Heirs unto them nor to any other Ancestor And if he were a Nobleman before he is by the Attainder made Ignoble not only himself but all his Children having regard unto the Nobility which they had by their Birth And this corruption is so strong and high that it cannot be salved by the King's pardon or otherwise than by Authority of Parliament But here is to be observed That Nobility is not a thing substantial but mere accidental for it may be present or absent without corruption of the Subject whereof it doth depend for experience sheweth That the passing of honourable Titles are restrained by exorbitant Crimes when as Nature in the mean while cannot be thrust away Wherefore though the Lawyers do call Extinguishment of Nobility which happeneth by such hainous Offences committed by corruption of Blood nevertheless they use not this manner of phrase as though Nobility were naturally and essentially in the Honour of Blood more than any other hereditary Faculty but because the right of Inheritance which is by degrees of communication of Blood directed is by that means determined and also in regard of the hatred and detestation of the Crime it is called corruption of Blood And here a Question may arise Whether by Attainder of the Father the Blood be so corrupted that the Son shall also be barred his Mother's Inheritance who hath not transgressed or no They that maintain the Affirmative say That forasmuch as none can be procreated or ingendred according to the course of Nature but of a Father and Mother and must have in him two Bloods viz. the Fathers and Mothers therefore the Law also faith Those Bloods commixt in the person of a man in lawful Marriage do constitute and make him an Heir and that none can be Heir unto any unless he hath both Bloods in him to whom he doth convey himself to be Heir And therefore the Heir of the half Blood shall not inherit because he doth want one of the Bloods which should make him inheritable And upon this reason Britan. chap. 5. saith If a man be attainted of Felony by Iudgment the Heirs ingendred after the Attainder are precluded from all manner of succession in the Heritage as well of the part of the Mother as of the Father for ex leproso parente leprosus generatur filius And when the Father is attainted of Treason or Felony the Blood in respect whereof he is Inheritable being corrupted the same hath but half his Blood that is the Blood of his Mother in him without corruption And with this doth agree Bracton lib. 3. cap. 13. Non valebit felonis generatio nec ad haereditatem paternam nec maternam si autem ante feloniam generationem fecerit talis generatio succedit in haereditatem patris vel matris à quo non fuerit felonia perpetrata Because at the time of his Birth he had two lawful Bloods commixt in him which could not be corrupted by the Attainder subsequent but only as unto that party who did offend But on the Negative part it is said That the Law is not so penal against the innocent Child as
to prejudice him touching his Mothers Inheritance who also did not offend or contrariwise especially in case where the Mother was seized of an Estate in Feesimple either in Lands or Tenements or Title of Honour And this was the case if I be not mistaken of Philip late Earl of Arundel notwithstanding the Attainder of Thomas Duke of Norfolk his Father for he had that Earldom in right of his Mother But they do agree That if the Lands or Tenements or a Title of Honour be given to a man and to his wife in tayl who hath Issue The Father is attainted of Treason and executed though this forfeiture of the Husband shall be no barr to the Wife concerning her interest by Survivorship yet their Issue is barred by the Statute 26 Hen. 8. cap. 13. and his Blood corrupted For in that case the Heir must necessarily make himself Heir as well of the Body of the one as of the other And yet the words of the Statute 32 Hen. 8. cap. 28. are That no Fine Feofâ—ment or other Act or Acts hereafter to be made or suffered by the Husband only of any Mannors Lands Tenements or Hereditaments being the Inheritance or Freehold of his Wife during the Coverture between them shall in any wise be or make any discontinuance or be prejudicial to the said Wife or to her Heirs or to such as shall have right title or interest to the same by the death of such Wife or Wives but the same Wife or her Heirs and such other to whom such right shall appertain after her decease shall or may then lawfully enter into all such Mannors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments according to their Rights and Titles therein For there is Adversity taken and agreed for Law between a discontinuance which doth imply a wrong and a lawful Baron which doth imply a right And therefore if Land be given to the Husband and the Wife and to the Heirs of their Bodies begotten and the Husband levies a Fine with Proclamation or do commit High Treason and dieth and the Wife before or after Entry dieth the Issue is barred and the Comisee for the King hath right unto the Lands because the Issue cannot claim as Heir unto both And with this doth agree Dyer 351. b. adjudged vide 5 Hen. 7. 32. Cott's Assize Coke's eighth part 27. where it is resolved That the Statute 32 Hen. 8. doth extend only unto Discontinuances although the Act hath general words or be prejudicial to the Wife or her Heirs c. but the conclusion if she shall lawfully enter c. according to their right and title therein which they cannot do when they be barred and have no right title and interest And this Statute doth give advantage unto the Wife c. so long as she hath right but it doth not extend to take away a future barr Although the Statute doth give Entry without limitation of any time nevertheless the Entry must attend upon the right and therefore if the Wife be seized in Feesimple and her Husband levy a Fine with Proclamation unto another and dieth now the Wife may enter by force of the Statute for as yet that Fine is not any barr unto her but her right doth remain which she may continue by Entry but if she do surcease her time and the five years do pass without Entry c. now by force of the Fine with Proclamation and five years past after the death of her Husband she is barred of her right and by consequence she cannot enter And the Statute doth speak of Fine only and not of Fine with Proclamation If there be Father and Son and the Father be seized of Lands holden in Capite or otherwise by Knight's Service the King doth create the Son Duke Earl or other Degree of Nobility and afterwards the Father dieth his Son being within the Age of One and twenty years he shall be no Ward but if the King had made him Knight in the life of his Father he should not have been in Ward after the death of his Father neither for the Lands descended nor for his Marriage though he be within Age. NOBILITY AND LORDS IN REPUTATION ONLY CHAP. XIV THERE are also other Lords in Reputation and Appellation who nevertheless are not de jure neither can they enjoy the priviledges of those of the Nobility that are Lords of the Parliament The Son and Heir of a Duke during his Father's life is only in courtesie of Speech and Honour called an Earl and the eldest Son of a Marquiss or an Earl a Lord but not so in legal proceedings or in the King's Courts of Judicature But the King may at his pleasure create them in the life of their Ancestors into any Degree of Lords of the Parliament And according to the German Custom all the younger Sons of Dukes and Marquisses are called Lords but by courtesie only which Title descends not to their Heirs A Duke or other of the Nobility of a Foreign Nation doth come into this Land by the King 's safe Conduct in which said Letters of safe Conduct he is named a Duke according to his Creation yet that Appellation maketh him not a Duke c. to sue or be sued by that name within this Realm but is only so by Reputation But if the King of Denmark or other Sovereign King come into England under safe Conduct he during his abode here ought to be styled by the name of King and to retain his Honour although not his Regal Command and Power And in this case may be observed by the way That no Sovereign King may enter into this Realm without licence though he be in League All the younger Sons of the Kings of England are of the Nobility of England and Earls by their Birth without any other Creation And if an Englishman be created Earl of the Empire or some other Title of Honour by the Emperor or other Monarch he shall not bear that Dignity in England but is only an Earl in Reputation A Lord or Peer of Scotland or Ireland is not of the Nobility or Peerage of England in all Courts of Justice although he is commonly reputed a Lord and hath priviledge as a Peer OF THE QUEEN CONSORT AND OF NOBLE WOMEN CHAP. XV. A QUEEN so called from the Sâ—xon word Cuningine as the King from Cuning by variation of Gender only as was their manner signifieth Power and Knowledge and thereby denotes the Sovereignty due unto them which they enjoyed in those days and do now in most Nations being capable of the Royal Diadem by the common right of Inheritance for want of Heirs Male But in France by the Salique Law the Sex is excluded from their Inheritance by which they debarred the English Title to their Crown There are three kinds of persons capable of the Title and Dignity of Queen amongst us and each of them different in Power and Priviledge The first is a Queen Sovereign to whom the Crown descends by Birth-right
Cooke of Kingsthorp in Northampton shire Gent â— Sr. Thomas Player of Hackney in Middlesex Knight Chamberlaine of the Citty of London Sr. Iohn Berkenhead Knight Master of Requests to his Majesty and Master of the Faculties and one of the members of the Honourable house of Comons Sr William Drake of Amersham in the County of Bucks Knight now maried to Elizabeth daughter of the honble â— â— Mountâ—gu Lord cheife Baron of his matys Court of Exchequer Sr William Pargiter of Greetworth in Northampton shire Knight a samily of good Antiquity whose Ancestors have been their Seated for many Generations Sr. William Waller of Winchester in Hantshire K descended from Richard Waller of Groombridg in Kent Esqr. who at the battle of Agencourt took Ioâ— Duke of Orleanse Prisoner and brought him to Groombridg whâ—re he remained a Prisoner 24 yeares and in memory of the Action it hath bin ever since allowed to the family to beare hanging on their Antient Crest the Armes of the said Duke Sr William Hustler of Acklam in Cleaveland in The County of York Kt Sr. Joseph Sheldon of the Citty oâ— London Kt. Alderman Lord Mâ—j therof Anno 〈◊〉 Sr. Robt. Hanson of the Citty of Londoâ— Knight and Alderman Lord Major thereof Anno 1673 Sr. Iohn Maynard of Gunnersbury in the Parish of Ealing in the County of Midlesex Knight sergeant at Law to his Majesty King Charles the second S â— Iohn Shortâ—r of the Citty of London Kt. and Alderman now maried to Ezabeâ— daughter of Iohn Birkhead of Ristwhait 〈◊〉 yâ— parish of Crostwhait in Cumberland Gen â— Robert Peyton of East Barnet in ye. County of 〈◊〉 Kt. descended of ye. Antient Family of ye. Peytonâ— Cambridgshire noâ— Maried to Iane Daughter and 〈◊〉 heyrs of Lionell Robison of Couton in York shire Esq. Sr. Edward Lowe of new Sarum in Wiltshire Kt. one of the Masters of the High Honourable Court of Chancery Sr. Iohn Iames of Wiâ—â—borow in Kâ—nt Kt. dâ—scended of ye. â—ntiâ—â—â— And Sâ—râ—ading Family of ye. Iamâ—â—is Who Transplâ—nted Themseluâ—s out of Cleâ—â— in Germaâ—y into England About ye◠〈◊〉 of yâ—â—â—igne of K. 〈…〉 Family Sâ—◠〈◊〉 in Tâ—â— Body of yâ— Book Sâ—ction Chap 1 Thâ— Sâ—S Ioâ—n is â—â—w Maried to Mâ—â—y dâ—ughtâ—r of Sr. Robert Kiâ—â—eâ—râ—w of Haâ—worth in Middleâ—â—â— Kt. desâ—â—ed 〈◊〉 Câ—â—mâ—erâ—â—n to yâ— Late Queen Mother 〈◊〉 Hon Sr. Robert Bâ—oth of Salford in Lâ—â—câ—shire K â— â— chife Iustice of 〈◊〉 Matâ—s Court of Comâ—n pleas in Ireland one of his Ma â—â—â— most Hon priâ—â—â—â—â—ncell for yâ— S d Kingdome Grandchild heyre of Humfry â—ooth of Salford 〈◊〉 Gâ—n whose Châ—ritable works 〈…〉 his name of w â— see more in â—â—â—dy of yâ— Bocke sâ—e 3 chapt. 1â— The Sd. Sâ—r. Robert was first maried to mary â—â—â—ghter heyre of Spencer Poâ—ts of Chalgraye in Bedfordshire Esq 〈…〉 to Susanna Daughter of Sr. 〈…〉 of Dean in East Kent Kt. Aâ—â—soâ— Dâ—ceased Sr. Charles Pitfeild of Hâ—xton in the Parish of St. Leonard â—horditch in Middlesex Kt. Descended of the Antient family of the Pitfeilds of â—umâ—nâ—sâ—ry in Dâ—rsâ—tshireâ— is now maried to Winefrid one of the Daughters and coeheyrs of Iohn Adderley of Cotton in Stafordshire Esâ— Sr. Thomas Middleton of Stansted Mount Fichit in ye. County of Essex Kt. now maried to Mary ye. Relict of Thomas Style Esq Eldest Son of Sr. Thomas Style of Waâ—ering bury in yeâ— County of Kent Bar â— and only Daughter of Sr. Stephen Langham of the Citty of London Kt. Sr. Francis Theobald of Barking hall in Suffolk Kt. a great Lover of Lerning fautor of Lerned men in Soemuch that Dr. Castle in his Polygâ—oâ— Lexicon makes This mention of him yt. he is harum Linguarum Callentissimus Sr. Robt. Hardinge late of Kings-Newton in the Parish of Melborne in Darby-shire Nâ—w of Grais Inn in Middle â— Kt. his matys Attorney of all his Forests c. from Trent Northward's a great sufferer for there matys King Charles the first second Hee Maried Anna eldest daughr. of Sr. Richard Sprignell of Hâ—gate in Middlesex Bar â— Deceased Sr. Io. Kirke of East Ham in Esex Kt. one of the Band of Gentleman Pentioners to his matyâ— King Charles the 2d. which sd. Sr. Io. and his family hath been very actiue for the Servi c â— of there King and Country in particular at Canade in America Sr. Thomas Marshe of Darkes in the Parish of South Mimms in Com Middlesex Knight Sr. William Beversham of Holbrookhall in Suffolk Knight one of the Masters oâ— the High and Honourable Court of Chancery And it was anciently ordained That all Knights Fees should come unto the eldest Son by succession of Heritage whereby he succeeding his Ancestor in the whole Inheritance might be the better able to maintain War against the King's Enemies or his Lords and that the Soccage of Freehold be partable between the Male Children to enable them to encrease into many Families for the better encrease of Husbandry But as nothing is more unconstant than the Estates we have in Lands and Livings even so long since these Tenures have been so indifferently mixt and confounded in the hands of each sort that there is not now any note of difference to be gathered by them Lambert Peramb of Kent 10. Et quia tale servitium forinsecum non semper manet sub eadem quantitate sed quandoque praestatur ad plus quandoque ad minus ideo eo quantitate Regalis servitii qualitate fiat mentio in charta ut tenens certum tenere possit quid quantum persolvere teneatur And therefore the certainty of the Law in this case is That he that holdeth by a whole and entire Knight's Fee must serve the King or his other Lord forty days in the Wars well and sufficiently arrayed and furnished at all points and by twenty days if he hold by a moiety of a Knights Fee and so proportionable And in the Seventh of Edw. 3. 246. it was demurred in Judgment Whether Forty days shall be accounted from the first day that the King did first enter into Scotland but it seemeth that the days shall be accompted from the first day that the King doth enter into Scotland because the Service is to be done out of the Realm And they that hold per Regale servitium are not to perform that Service unless the King do also go himself into the Wars in proper Person by the Opinion of Sir VVilliam Earle Chief Justice of the Common Pleas Irium Sept. Edw. 3. 246. but vide 3 Hen. 6. tit Protection 2. in which Case it was observed That seeing the Protector who was Prorex went the same was adjudged a Voyage Royal. Also before the Statute de quia emptores terrarum which was made decimo octavo Edw. 1. the King or other Lord had given Lands to a Knight to hold of him by Service and Chivalry scil to go with the King or with his Lord when the King doth make a Voyage Royal to subdue
Domini sui ei conferet maritagium suum c. which words cannot be understood when he is out of Ward and Custody no more than when he is married after the Age of One and twenty years Note hereby that the King may prevent his Grantee or other Lords of the double value by Knighthood Yet in such case presently after the Heir is made a Knight after the death of his Ancestor the Lord may have a Writ de valore maritagii for the single Also by the ancient Common Law of this Realm if a Villain be made a Knight he is immediately infranchised And if a Ribald or a man of base birth and condition had struck a Knight by the ancient Law he should have lost his hand wherewith he offended But in France it was anciently adjudged that when the Lord of a Villain had Knighted his Villain being a Gentleman he became free and had his Honour lawâ—ully but if another Lord had Knighted him nothing had been wrought by it for none could manumit him but his Lord and till Manumission or Knighthood he had civil freedom for his ground but was not capable of it except by the King only It was enacted by Parliament in the sixth year of the Reign of King Iohn in haec verba Rex Vicecom c. Sciatis quod consensum est cum assensu Archiepiscoporum Comitum Baronum omnium fidelium nostrorum Angliae quod novem Milites per totam Angliam invenient decuriam Militum bene paratorum aequis armis ad defensionem Regni nostri There hath ever been and still is great use of the Services of Knights even in Civil Affairs and concerning matters of Justice as in a Writ of Right which is the highest Writ in Law for trial of Titles touching the Inheritance of Lands the Tenant is at his Election to have his Trial by great Assize or else by Battel if by the great Assize the Writ De magna Assiza eligenda shall be thus viz. Rex Vicecomiti salutem c. Summone as per bonos summonitores quatuor legales Milites de Comitatu tuo quod sint coram Iusticiariis nostris ad primam Assizam cum in partes illas venerint ad eligendum super sacramentum suum 12 de militibus de visum de N. qui melius sciant velint dicere veritatem adfaciendam recognitionem magnae assurae inter A. petent B. tenent de uno messuagio cum pertinentiis in N. unde idem B. qui tenens est posuit secum magnam Ass. nostram petit recognitionem fieri utrum eorum habent jus in messuagium praed B. qui tunc sit ibi auditurus illam electionem habeas ibi nomina praed milit ad hoc breve c. And upon the Return of this Writ those four Knights must appear gladiis cuncti Dier 79. fol. 103. If the Tenant make his Election by Battel each parties are to choose their Champions and the Court shall award the Battel and the Champions shall be at Mainprize and sworn to perform the Battel at a certain day in the Term and idem dies shall be given to the parties at which day and place a List shall be made in an even and plain Ground there quadrant that is to say every way sixty foot square and the Place or Court for the Justices of the Common Pleas without and upon the Lists furnished with the same Clothes which belong to their Court at Westminster and a Barr shall be there made for the Serjeants at Law and the Robes of the Justices and Serjeants shall be of Scarlet with their Coifs on as it was the Thirteenth of Eliz. and then was made Proclamation with three O Yes And the Demandant first was solemnly demanded and did not appear whereupon the Manuperors of the Champion were demanded to bring forth the Champion of the Demandant who came into the place apparelled with red Sandals upon his black Armour bare legged from the Knee downwards and bare headed and bare Arms to the Elbows being brought in by a Knight namely Sir Ierom Bowes who carried a red Battoon of an ell long tipped with horn and a Yeoman carrying the Target made of double Leather and they were brought in at the North side of the Lists and went about the sides of the Lists until they came to the midst of the Lists and then came towards the Barr before the Justices with three solemn Congies and there was he made to stand on the South side of the place being the right side of the Court And after that the other Champion was brought in in like manner at the South side of the Lists with like Congies by the hands of Sir Henry Chequie Kt. c. and was placed on the North side of the Barr and two Serjeants being of the Counsel of each part in the midst between them This done the Demandant was solemnly called again and appeared not but made default Bowham Serjeant for the Tenant prayed the Court to record the Nonsuit quod factum fuit And then Dyer Chief Justice reciting the Writ and Content and Issue joyned upon the Battel and the other of the Champions to perform it and the prefiction of this day and place did give final Judgment against the Demandant and that the Tenant should have the Land to him and to his Heirs for ever and the Demandant and his Pledges de prosequendo in misericordia Reginae And afterwards solemn Proclamation was made that the Champions and all others there present which were by estimation above Four thousand persons might depart every man in the peace of God and the Queen sic fecerunt cum magno clamore vivat Regina Also if false Judgment be given in the Country which is the Sheriffs Court then the Writ shall be thus Henricus c. Vicecomiti Lincoln salutem Si A. fecerit c. tum in pleno Comitatu tuo per breve nostrum de recto inter Iohannem L. petentem Will B. tenentem de uno messuagio centum acris terrae cum pertinentiis in C. unde idem I. L. queritur falsum sibi factum fuisse Iudicium in eodem Record illud habeas coram Iusticiariis Iuris apud Westminsterium tali die sub sigillo tuo per quatuor legales Milites ejusdem comitatus illos qui Recordo illi interfuerunt summoneas per bonos summonitores praedictum B. quod tunc sit ibi auditurus Recordum illud habeas ibi sua nomina quatuor militum hoc breve Fitz. Nat. Brev. itidem E. And those four must be Knights indeed Also the Justices upon consideration of the usual words in every Writ of Venire Facias Coram c. Duodecim tum Milites quam alios liberos legales homines c. say that these words tum Milites were not at the first put into the Writ without effect Plowden 117. b. For it seemeth that in diebus
illis some Knights were returned upon every Venire Facias By the Statute of Magna Charta cap. 12. It is ordained that Assizes of Novel Disseison and Mortdancester should not be taken any where but within the Countries where they happen by the Justices of Assize and the Knights of the Shire vide Westminster 2. chap. 30. And by the Seven and twentieth of Edward the First chap. 30. de finibus levandis amongst other things it is enacted That for the utility of the Realm and the more assured conservation of the Peace the Justices assigned to take Assizes in all Shires where they take Assizes as it is ordained immediately after the Assizes taken in the Shires shall remain both together if they be Lay and if one of them be a Clerk then one of the most discreet Knights of the Shire being associated unto him that is a Lay-man by our Writ shall deliver the Goals of the Shires as well within the Liberties as without of all manner of Prisoners after the form of the Goal Delivery of those Shires beâ—ore time used Also in the Statute of Westminster 21. cap. 38. de non ponendis in Assizis Iuratis it is provided that the said Statute shall not extend to Grand Assizes in which it behoveth many times Knights to pass not resident in the County for the scarcity of Knights so that they have Lands in the Shire And by the Law Knights having Land may be returned upon Juries in ordinary Trials between party and party as other Freeholders may be And therefore in a Challenge to the great Assize under Edward the Third one was challenged pur ceo qu'il fait abaner or as the Abridgment hath it a Baronet but it was not allowed and the Reason is given Car s'il soit à Baner ne tient pas per Baronie il serra en l'assise Of the double parity of England that is of Barons and all Dignities above them being Peers of the Realm and all other under them are Peers amongst themselves for notwithstanding that Dignity of Knighthood they are reckoned amongst the Commons And we daily see that Knights do serve in Parliament as Members of the Commonalty Nevertheless the Sheriff in his discretion will not impannel Knights but in special and great Causes As in Cases of Indictments of a Peer of the Realm they are to be enquired and found by Knights and Esquires though their Trial shall be only by their Peers And in 38 Hen. 8. Henry Howard Earl of Surrey Son and Heir apparent of Thomas Duke of Norfolk was attainted of High Treason and was tried also by Knights Esquires and Gentlemen and not by Lords or Peers of the Realm because he was not of that Dignity by Creation Since the use of making every Earl first a Baron of some place which began as most Writers treat about the time of Henry the Eighth it hath been a Custome to style their Heirs apparent Lords and Barons with the Title of their Father's Barony when Viscounts or Baron's Heirs apparent are only styled Esquires but this is only a piece of Civility and of meer fashion yet it is allowed of in Heraldry with whom the Rule is That the eldest Son of every one of a created Degree is as of the next Degree under him which may be applied to Dukes Earls and the like But in Legal Proceedings they enjoy no such matter nor have by their being Heirs Apparent any Prerogative of the greater Nobillty And in case where a Peer of the Realm is party Plaintiff or Defendant in any Action or Suit if the Sheriff do not return one Knight at the least to be of the Jury the said Noble Person may Challenge and for that only cause quash the whole pannel By the Statute of Carlisle 15 Edw. 2. it was enacted That he who levied a Fine should appear in proper person to the intent that his Age Idiocy or other defect might be discovered by the Judges Nevertheless upon Impotency whereby he cannot come in Court two or one of the Justices by the consent of the rest of the Justices shall go unto him and take his Recognizance and if but one of them go he shall take a Knight with him and shall certifie it in the Bench of Record to the intent that all things incident to the fine be examined by them and then the fine may be levied But after this good Statute a worse Custom and Use hath come in place For by a Dedimus potestatem out of Chancery to one Knight and to a Justice of the Peace of the County in such cases is procured and directed to a Knight and two others who perhaps be neither Knights nor Justices but perhaps men of small estimation and unto two or three of them without saying Quorum the Knight shall be one and two of them without the Knight have taken the Recognizance of the Fine ibid. 101. b. But great prejudice this practise of omitting the interposing of the usual Service of Knights in this behalf hath been to many and scandalous to the Law of the Land they sometimes taking Recognizances of a Fine from a Feme Covert as if she were sole and many times acknowledged by Justices If a Tenant do lay an Essoin de morbo lecti he may have a Writ out of the Chancery to warrant it by which it shall be commanded to four Knights to view him and if they see him sick then they are to give him day to the end of a year and a day Note the Register fol. 177. b. Quod Coronator non elegatur nisi sit miles in c. juxta formam Statuti Westm. 1. cap. 10. It is a received Opinion that Knights are excused from attendance at Leets and Britton 29. 36. is cited to prove it And by a large understanding of the intent and meaning of the Statute of Marlbridge chap. 10. For the ancient Common Law had such respect to the Degree of Knighthood that they nor their eldest Sons were compelled to find Pledges in the Leet or Law-days for the Statute of Marlbridge aforesaid was not Introductiva novae Legis for it was before the Conquest And the Common Law is not by this Statute abridged And by the Book called the Mirror of Iustice mentioned in the Preface to Coke's ninth part it is said that Knights are excepted And so it appears that the practice was as well before as immediately after the making of that Statute of Marlbridge and Interpretatio Practica is a principal way and form of Interpretation of Laws The Lord Chancellor's Speech in the Case of Postnati fol. 58. And in Divinity Praxis sanctorum est interpretatio praeceptorum ibid. 66. But a Knight and all Superiors and Inferiors are bound by Law to attend the County or Sheriffs Court wherein he dwelleth and at his peril to take notice of the proceedings thereof For if a Man be Outlawed of Felony at a County Court and one of the same County not
Brakent waite in the Parish of Kirkbyâ— overblow in the iâ—est rideing of Yorkshire Esq lineally descended from the Warners of Warner hall in the County of Essex Humphrey Borlase of Treluddro in the County of Cornwall Esqr. Anthony Keck of The Inner Temple London Esqr. Iacob Lucie of the Citty of London Esqr. now maried to Mary daughter of Iohn Sr. Iohn of Coldoverton in the County of Leicester Esqr. Richard Peirce of the Citty of London Esqr. Roger Iames of Riegate in Surrey Esqr. of yâ— antient family of Haestract in Holland from whom are Descended the severall familys of the Iames of Surreyâ— Kent Middlesex Essex wk. Sd. Roger is nâ—w maried to Elizabeth Daughter of Sr. Anthony Ancher of Bishops boâ—â—â—h in Kent Kt. deceased Charles Beauvoir of the Citty of London Esqr. Desâ—â—nded from the Family of the Beauvoir of the Island of Garnsey Iohn Evance of the Citty 〈◊〉 of 〈◊〉 London Esqr. Valentine Crome of Maydenâ— Early in Berkâ—shire Esqr. descended from the antient family of Lewis in Yorkshire Thomas Windham of Tale in Devonshire Esq one of the Grooms of his matysâ— Bedchamber third son of Sr. Edmond Windham of Cathanger in Somerset shireâ— Kt Marshall of his matysâ— most honble household and lineally descended of the antient family of the Windhams of Crown-Thorp in the County of Norfolk Thomas Stringer of Bexwells in the County of Essex Esqâ— Daniel Collingwood of Branton in Northumberland Es r Major to the Queens Troop of his Matis Guard Governor of his Matisâ— Castle in Holy Island and Deputy Leivtenant of the sâ—id County of Northumberland Iohn Iollife of the Citty of London Esq r descened from the family of Iollifs of Botham in Staffordshire Iohn Strachey of Sutton Court in the County of Somerset Esqr. Nicholas Martyn of Lincolns Inn in Middlesex Esq. son and heyre of Nicholas Martyn of Lincolns â—n aforesaid Esr. deceased who was descended from the family of ye. Martins of Admiston alias Athelhaâ—â—ston in Dorsetsh now maried to Dorcas daughter oâ— Richard Graves Esqr. deceased late Reader of Lincolns Innâ— William Palmer of Winthorp in Lincolnsh Esq â— Captaine of a Troop in the Regiment of Horse of his Grace the Duke of â—onmouth Captaine Generall of all his â—atys land forces Edward Clarke of the Inner Temple London Esqr. son and heyre of Edward Clarke of Chipley in the County of Somerset Esqr. Maried Mary sole daughter heyreâ— of Samuel Ieppe of Suttons courtâ— in the sd. county Esq. Anthony Rowe of St. Martins in the Fields in the County of Middâ— Esq â— third son of Sr. Thomas Rowe of Muswell hill in the said County K â— Henry Marwood of 〈◊〉 Busâ—y in Yorkshire Esqr. Son and heyre of Sr. George Hâ—rwood Bart. First maried to Margaret fourth daughter of thâ— R â— honourable Conâ—ers Ld. Darcâ—â—to his second Dorothy second daughter of Allen Bellingham of Lâ—vâ—ns in Westmâ—rland Esq r and to his present wife 〈◊〉 second Daughter of Sr. Thoâ— Wâ—â—â—worth of Emprall in Yorkshire K â— Edward Brabaâ—on of Bally arthur in the County of Wicâ—loe in Ireland Esqr. second son to the Right Honourable Edward Earle of â—eath deceased William Lâ—ggan of Butlers marston in Warwickshire Esqrâ— now maried to 〈◊〉 daughter to 〈◊〉 Newsham of Chadhurst in the s d County Esq r Henry Brouncker of Roumbold-week in sussex and of Brokedish in Norfolk Esqr. Iames Vernon of St. Martins in the Fields Esq r Secretary to the R t Noble Iames Duke of Monmouth Descended from the antient Family of the Vernons of Cheshire who were Barons of Shipbrooke Thomas Cudmore of Keâ—edon in Essex Esqr. son heire of Thomas Cudmore Esqr. deceasedâ— by Dorothy eldest daughter and Coheire of Sr. Thomas Cecill Kt. son of Tho Earle of Exeterâ— by Dorothy daughter Coheire of Iohn Nevill Ld. Latimer son and heyre of Io Ld. Latimer by Dorothy daughter and Coheyre of Sr. George Vere Kt. wch sd. Sr. Tho dyed Anno 1002. and â—â—eth buried in Stamford Baron in Northaâ—tonsâ—â—mong his Ancestors Samuel Collins Dr. in Physick late fellow of Trinity Colledge in Cambridge onely sonof Iohn Collins late Parson of Rotherfield in Sussâ—x decended from the antient Family of the Collins of the Countys of Somersetâ— and Devonshire he waâ—â— First maried to Ann eldest daughter of Iohn Bodenham Esqr. descended from the family of the Bodenhams of Wiltshiâ— and Herefordshire And now to Dame Katherine Countessâ— Dowâ—gâ—â— of Carnwath in scotland daughter of Io Abington of Dowdes well in Glocestershire Esqr. descended from the antient Family of the Abingtons OF ESQUIRES CHAP. XXV ALTHOUGH by the Civil Law there be no Gentlemen of Title under Knights but all the rest went under the name of People yet with us there are in this rank which have names of Preheminence whereby they are in Degree above the rest as Esquires and Gentlemen all which give Ensigns of Coats of Arms and thereby are distinguished from the meaner People in which respect Bartoll's Tract de Ensignes calleth them Noble but yet of weak Nobility for it hath no further Prerogative in it than it makes them differ from the baser sort of People Of these two sorts of Gentlemen with us the Esquire hath the Priority But it seemeth if an Esquire be named Gentleman or a Gentleman called an Esquire it is no Offence or Fault in Legal Proceedings Esquire seemeth by the common Name we give him in Latin to have his Original either for that he carried the Armour of the King Duke or other great Personage as we read not only in Scripture as Saul and Ionathan had their Armour-bearers but in Poets and other profane Stories we find that Troclus was Achilles's Armour-bearer and Clytus Alexander's the Great whereupon some write that he whom we call Armiger in Latin is a Footman that with a Spear Shield or Head-piece followeth an armed Knight in Battel or rather as some other suppose it is the Footman armed in the Field But howsoever the words be taken this is sure That those men were of good accompt in the old time as those that won themselves Credit out of War and so their Estimation remaineth in their Posterity And as those were in times before so are these which are in our days as descending for the most part from their worthy Ancestors And our Books of Common Law doth distinguish them thus viz. Knighthood is a Dignity but Esquires and Gentlemen are but Names of Worship And Brooks in the Abridgment of that Case Title Nosman de Dignitie 33. saith To be a Knight est gradus but to be an Esquire or Gentleman est status for Gradus continet status in se non è contrario Concerning the word Worshipful read in the printed Book of Titles of Honour the first Part fol. 124. sequentia In times past every Knight had two of these waiting upon him who carried his Murrion and Shield and as inseparable Companions they stuck close to him because of the said Knight their Lord they held
certain Lands in Escuage like as the Knight himself did of the King by Knights Service The beginning of giving Arms in Europe amongst Christians is supposed from the Holy Wars for the Turks paint them not And so with us about Henry the Third's time they became here more firmly established And when the Prince enobled any he usually gave them the particular of his bearing in Blazon Iohn Selden in his Preface fol. 5. where you may also see an Example in King Richard the Second But now there are five distinct sorts of Esquires observed and those that have been already spoken of are now in no request Of these sorts the principal at this day are the eldest Sons of Viscounts and Lord next are all Noblemens younger Sons then are accounted those that are select Esquires for the King's Body the next are Knights eldest Sons successively in a fourth rank are reckoned those unto whom the King himself together with the Title giveth Arms or createth Esquires by putting about their Necks a Silver Collar of SS and in former times upon their Heels a pair of white silvered Spurs whereupon at this day in the Western part of the Kingdom they be called White-spurs for distinction from Knights who were wont to wear gilt Spurs and to the first begotten Sons only of these doth this Title belong In the fifth and last place be those that have any superiour publick Office in the Kingdom as high Sheriffs Justices of the Peace c. or serve the King in any worshipful Calling At the Coronation of Kings and Queens Knights of the Bath are made men of worth and honourable blood to the end that their Majesties may be accompanied in their own Honours every of which Knights having two Gentlemen to attend them in that Ceremony who are ever after by that Service enabled to be Esquires during their lives But the name of Esquire in ancient time was a name of Charge and Office and first crept in amongst other Titles of Dignity and Worship so far as ever I could observe in the Reign of King Richard the Second vide Sir Thomas Smith de Republica Anglorum fol. 26. where he saith That the Esquire is no distinct Order of the Commonwealth A Serjeant of the King's Kitchin may bear the Name and Addition of Cook or Esquire according to the Opinion of Newton But Ienne saith Such Officers of his Majestie 's Houshold would be much grieved if they should be named by their Trade or Office Peradventure in that case the Writ may be good because of the Statute viz. 1 Hen. 5. ch 5. For the Statute is That he should be named of the Town Degree State Condition or Mystery and when he was named Cook he observed the Statute for he hath named him by his own name of Mystery and yet he may be in that case an Esquire and a Cook If a man be an Esquire or Gentleman only by Office and loseth the same he loseth also that title of Gentility Note That an Esquire or Gentleman is but an Addition to satisfie the said Statute but names of Dignity are parcel of the name And thereupon if a Praecipe quod reddat be against Iohn a Stiles Yeoman and recovery is had whereas the Tenant was a Gentleman yet the Recovery is good The same Law where a Release is made to Iohn a Stiles Yeoman who is a Gentleman and where addition is given by the party where it needeth not by the Law being no Dignity it is void So if a deed be made to a Gentleman by the name of a Yeoman for there is a great difference between Deeds and Writs If an Esquire be to be Arraigned of High Treason he may and ought to be tried per probos Legales homines that may expend Forty shillings of Freehold or be worth One hundred pounds in the value of Goods And so the Statute that doth speak of men of his condition hath always been put in ure Dyer 99. b. Note a Knight hath no other priviledge by Statute or Common Law The King may make an Esquire by Patent viz. Creamus te Armigerum c. Note the Preface to the printed Book of Titles of Honour 5. b. 318. By the statute 21. Hen. 8. chap. 13. amongst other things it is enacted that the Brethren and Sons born in Wedlock of every Knight being Spiritual men may every of them purchase License or Dispensation and receive take and keep two Parsonages or Benefices with cure of souls The Son or Sons of any Knight and heir apparent of an Esquire is priviledge to keep Greyhounds setting Doggs or Nets to take Pheasants or Partridges though he cannot dispend ten pounds in his own right or in his Wives right of Estate of Inheritance or of the value of thirty pounds of Estate for life By the precedent discourse of Knights Batchelors we understand that all persons by the common Law are compellable to take the degree of Knighthood or to fine if they are possest of such an Estate as the King and his Council shall judge fit to maintain that Port in their Country And his annual Revenue deemed fit for that Dignity and the fines imposed upon such as refused we find in our Histories and Statutes to vary with the times and certainly the best Esquires or at least none under the Reputation of Gentlemen were compelled although 't was at the King's pleasure And therefore 1 Edw. 2. Stat. de Militibus the Parliament saith Sanderson more for ease of the Subject than profit of the King limited it to such as had Twenty pounds per Annum and better and afterwards 't was raised to Thirty pounds and a plentiful Revenue in those times when a Dowry of Three thousand pounds per Annum to a Queen was deemed a great impoverishment to the Crown and Kingdom but the East and Western part of the World being laid open to the Merchants money began to be more common and by consequence Land to its value so that in the reign of King Charles the First Forty pounds per Annum being the rate set for such as ought to be made Knights or to fine many Farmers Leaseholders Merchants Inholders and others were called in whereby above 100 thousand pounds was brought into the Exchequer Notwithstanding which divers persons made Friends and took the Degree of Knighthood which occasioned the extinguishment of the ancient Tax For many Esquires by birth wealth and education who bore the chiefest Offices of Honour and Trust in the Commonwealth disdained to stoop or give place to those new dubbed Knights countenanced the Complaints of the common people against the Law it self as a grievance and prevailed so far in the following Parliament to get it repeal'd as you may see 17 Car. chap. 20. Since which time the difference between the Degree of Knighthood and Dignity of an Esquire consists only in Title a double rate in the Pole Tax and priority of place which as I before noted is often