within yeares of discreâ—ion b l. 5. ff ad leg Falcid l. 12 de leg and the contract or couenant of such persons is not ratified by oath which by law are forbidden to contract c l. non dubiuÌ„ C. de legib as Monkes and Fryers and such like religious persons Canonologus Indeede such persons are said in our lawe to be mortui mundo dead to the world d 16. q. vltim c. si and they cannot liue without their Cloister no more then a fish without the water e 16. q. 1. plac and he can haue nothing priuate or proper to himselfe and therefore the rule of the Canon-law is Monachus habens aliquid de proprio sepeliri debet in sterquilinio f De sta mo c. 2. C. ad monaster Ca. 1. 2. de postula 16. q. 1. monach c. religios de procur in cler and he caÌ„ not be any mans aduocate in a cause or any mans proxie without the consent of his Abbot or Soueraigne and that must be to the vse and behoofe of his monasterie and the like law is of Friers h Cle. dud de sepul Cle. exâ—ri de parad de verbo sig Nomomathes But is there no differeÌ„ce in the Lawe betwixt the contracts of infants and the contracts of Monkes and Friers Codicgn Yes very great For Monkes and 3. Monkes are absolutely ê“hibited by the Ciuill lawe to make any coÌ„tract infants are disabled with a certaine qualification Friers are prohibited by Lawe to make any contract so that as I haue abouesaid their contract can not be good though it be coÌ„firmed by oath But infants are not ture prohibiti but inhabiles ex iuris dispositione and therfore their contracts may by oath be established i Authent sacramenta puberuÌ„ cum tota sua materia C. si aduer veÌ„dit in corpore vnde sumitur Anglonomoph As the former Lawes haue very greatly disabled Monkes and religious persons who are tied to a certaine rule so our Law hath very much diminished their ability as to their intermedling in secular matters In a Scire facias brought by a Prior against a parson out of a recouery had against his predecessor it was 4. That by the Common law Priors vnder the obedience of a Soueraigne and which weare datife and remoueable could not impleade or bee impleaded without their soueraigne vnlesse it were by speciall custome held that the defendant should not be estopped by the admittance of his predecessor in the first action to pleade in this Scire facias that the Priour was a Monke professed vnder the obedience c. and was datife and remoueable k 34. H. 6. 2. for though it haue beene helde that a Prior perpetuall may prescribe to implead and to be impleaded without his Soueraigne yet by common intent a Prior datife and remoueable at the will of the party shall haue no action by such vsage but if he wil haue any plea he must shew some special matter 39. E 3. 34. and it hath bene said that the knights of S. Iohn of Ierusalem had their possessions seuerall 5. The same Lawe was of the knights of S. Iohn of Ierusalem yet they could not vse an action without their Prior m 32. H. 6. 5 31. and a Prior which was presentable and had Couent and Common seale could not before the dissolution of Abbeys and Priories charge his house in perpetuum without the assent of the Patron and Ordinarie neyther could hee haue the Writte De aduocatione decimarum nor a iuris vtrum n 12. H. 4. Stath tit Charge and a writte was abated beyng brought against a Prioresse because the Prior of S. Iohnes was commaunder of the house whereof shee was Prioresse and because she was made Prioresse by him and was vnder his obedience and remoueable at his will notwithstanding that shee had Couent and Common seale and had her possessions seuerall and was wonte to Lease the lande for tearme of yeares o 12. R. 2. Nonabilitie 4. and if a contract bee made with an Abbotte and his Monke the writ that hath beene grouÌ„ded vpon this contract hath bene brought against the Abbot onely p 33. E. 3. Bâ—â— 913. 2. H. 4. 21. and so hath a writte of Detinue bene brought being coÌ„ceiued vpoÌ„ a deliuery of goods made to the Monke to the vse of the Abbot q Ibidem yet it hath bene thought that an action will lie against a Monke if he be not in subiection to some Soueraigne r 14. H. 4. 37. But it hath bene taken for a general learning with vs that Monkes Friers Canons professed the like could not grant any thing Å¿ 14. H. 8. 16. 2. R. 3. 5. 32. H. 6. 31. neither could they be grauÌ„tees of any thing t 5. H. 7. 25. 19. H. 6. 25. neither are they capable by way of deuise u Perk. tit Deuis sect 537 the coueÌ„t of an Abbey or Priorie can yeeld so little aduantage to the house in matter of purchase that if in former times land had beene giuen to an Abbot and to his couent this could not be good saue onely during the life of the Abbot for the want of this word successors a 11. H. 4. 84. â— Curi but touching the abilitie of infants in contractes and purchases the Lawe is diuerse according to the diuersitie of cases and if an infant do buy of any a coate or necessarie vestmeÌ„t for a certaine summe or if he make a couenant for his meate paying 12. d. a weeke according to M. Paston his opinion this couenant is void yea and if 6. The infants contract for his meate apparell and necessaries is good if he be of the age of fourtene yeres hee make a bonde for it the bonde likewise is void but Markeham thinketh the contrarie if the infant that is so bond be of the age of fourtene yeares b 21. H. 6. 31. 18. E. 4. 2. Perk. Grau 4. D. S. dial 2. fo 113. and by M. Brookes opinion this is the better Law c Br. Labourers 30. and if an infant lease land for tearme of yeares rendring a rent or doe sell a horse or 7. That which an infant doth without actual liuery may bee auoyded by action without entre oâ— seisure but that which he doth by actuall liuery can not be auoided without entre oâ— seisure any other thing he may chose to haue an action of dette for the rent reserued vpon the Lease or a writte of trespasse for the occupation of the lande and so he may haue an action of trespasse for the occupation of a thing sold by him and if an infant doe giue to one a horse without actuall deliuerie of the horse into his hands at the time of the gift and the donee taketh the Horse by reason of this gifte the infant may haue an action of Trespasse
but it is a question with vs if one deuise to his wife the third part of all his goods and chattels whether this shall be intended as they shall be after the legacies or debts paid or as they were at the time of the deuise d 30. H. 8. 59. Dyl But this doubt of later time hath receiued decision for where a man deuised the 2. That by the Common law if a man deuise the third parte of his goods to his wife it shal be so rated as they weare at the time of the death of the testator 3. That the Queene may graunt a thing in action moitie of his goods to his wife and died it was ruled that she shall haue the goods as they were at the time of the death of the testator if the testator be not indebted e 5. Mari. 164. and as for graunting things in action we haue this positiue grounde in law that the Queene may grant ouer her rent and condition of reentrie for the nonpaiment of it and her action or any thing that her highnes hath in action but contrariwise it is of a common person f 2. H. 7. 8. Nomom Now shew me of what thinges and 4. Diuision in what sorte iointenancie or tenancie in common may be Codicgn It may be of all such things as lie in 1. That iointenancie by the Ciuil law may be of all such things as lie in contract contract as lambe milke woll cheese and corne and whatsoeuer is gained by the labour of oxē or the harrowing of horses or the letting to gift of kine g L. si nō fuerint ff pro soc and by the nature of the contract when two are agreed to be tenants in common of the profites comming and rising of beasts the losse of the beastes perteyneth onely to him in whom the very propertie of the beastes be but the charge of the pasture and labour which is to be taken about thē belongeth onely to him who is admitted to be tenant in common for the profites 2. That the limitation of tenancie in cōmon is by the partie but the construction of it by the law The possession in cōmon of beasts doth cōtinue vntill they haue yong if the possessiō were limited at the first vntill they had yoong and if two be agreed to be tenants in common of all the profites of a certaine ground the tenancie in cōmon ceaseth not till all the profites be taken and therefore if two be agreed to be tenants in common from the Calends of March vntill such time as their fields are new to be tilled sowne they shal be tenants in common vnto the Calendes of Nouember because betwixt both the Calendes the fields may be tilled sowne or suppose that they haue contracted a tenancie in common of kine from the Calendes of Iuly vntill they haue yonge this tenancie in cōmon shall continue till the Calends of Aprill next ensuing because for the most part they are wont to calfe betwixt both the Calends h L. si conuenerit in princ ff pro socio Anglono A parson may grant to another the moitie of his tithes for years whether it be lamb wooll or corne yet he hath no possession of them because they are not yet in esse i 38. E. 3. 6. but yet he hath an interest in them may grant the moitie of them as wel as one may grant to another that it shall be lawfull for him to take euery yeere a Deare or a Hare or a Cony within his soile this is a good grant k 10. H. 7. 30. and by the same reason that he may grant his tithes he may grant the moitie of them and so make a tenancy in common Nomoma Suppose the case to be this that two 5. Diuision iointenants or tenants in common haue agreed to make a common wall about their ground or that they should plant a certain number of trees in their common soile and one of them alieneth his part whether is his assignee bound to performe the couenant 1. That an assignee in the Ciuill lawe is bound by the the couenant of his grauntor Codicgn In our law there be many authorities that he ought to performe the couenant l L. quaesit §. quod a Titio ff de praeca arg l. in hoc iudiciū §. penult ff de cōmun diuid ff de damn infect l. fluminū §. adducitur ff pro soc l. 1. demque Anglonomoph To that our law agreeth for if a man lease a house and land for yeares by deed indented and the lessee doth couenant that he 2. That by the Common law in such case the assignee is bound by the couenant and his assignees shall repaire the house and after the lessee granteth ouer his terme and the assignee doth not repaire it an action of couenāt lieth against the assignee for this is a couenant which runneth with the land m 25. H. 8. Br. couen 32. Deputie 16. and according to M. Brookes opinion it lieth also against the lessee after that he hath assigned ouer his terme if he bring seueral writs of couenāt against thē both there is no remedie till he haue had execution against one of them and then if he sue the other he may haue an Audit a querela n Br. Couen 32. Nomom I will content my selfe at this time with your instructions touching iointenants tenants in common will passe ouer to the examining of the course of exchaunges The sixth Dialogue of Exchaunges NOnomath What if two do deale together 1. Diuision after this sort the one of thē giueth a horse and x. s. for the horse of an other man whether is this a bargaine and sale or an exchaunge Codicgn In such case either it is intended and 1. That by thē Ciuill law cōtracts for a certaine price are not exchaunges vttered betwixt the parties that the one shal haue such a thing for a certaine price as namely that A. shall haue the horse of B. for ten pounds and B. taketh of A. sixe pounds and an other horse in full paiment and satisfactiō this is cleerely a bargaine and sale a L. tenetur §. 1. de action emp. but if A. had giuen B. a horse for a horse that had bene an exchaunge b Ar. I. item si pretio §. 1. ff locat Anglonom By our Law there must bee the expresse 2. That by the Common law the word Excambium must be vsed in the exchaunge word of exchaūge mētioned otherwise a thing cā not be said to passe by exchaūge for the word excambiū only maketh an exchaūge as the words liberūmaritagiū onely doe make frankmariage for if I giue to one an acre of land by deed indented and he by the same deed giueth to me an other acre for this acre nothing passeth except liuerie be made and then the
that the deuisee be capable at the time of the death of the testator so it is likewise by our law for though a man may not graunt nor giue lands to his wife during the couerture because they both are but one persoÌ„ in law yet by custome heretofore which the CoÌ„mon law did fauour and now by statute he might or may deuise his lands to his wife to haue in fee simple or otherwise because such deuise taketh not effect till the death of the deuisor p Littl. lib. 2. c. 10. Sect. 8. 27. Assis pl. 60. and then they are not one person q 24. H. 8. Br. Deuis 34. Nomom Now let me know what things may 3. Diuision be deuised Codicgn Whatsoeuer things the testator hath 1. That by the Ciuill law all such things may bee deuised as the testator hath in his owne right at the time of the deuise as in his owne right r ff de legat 2. l. vinum §. si reÌ„ tuam if he happen to deuise a thing which is not his owne but an other maÌ„s the executor is by our Lawe compelable to buy it and to giue it to the deuisee by vertue of the will or if the owner will not sell it hee ought to pay the very value and full estimation of it to the deuisee Å¿ ff de legat 3. l. dubium §. vlti and if lande bee bought by the deuisor for which he hath not payed any monie or not all the monie if he died and the deuisee will haue the land hee must pay the monie and so enioy the land t L. 39. §. IdeÌ„ Iulianus de legat 1. but if the deuisor haue solde lande and hath not receiued the monie and he deuiseth the lande so solde to I. S. the deuisee in this case shall not haue the lande solde but the monie that is to bee payed for it for an argument is rightly drawne ab augmento ad diminutionem u L. si ex toto eo tit so that this conclusion may bee made is the thing bought due to the deuisee then the deuisee ought to pay the monie is the thing not solde not due to the deuisee then hee must haue the monie that is to bee payed for it Anglonomoph In our Lawe the making of a testament 2. The three degrees of a testament by the Common law hath three partes Inception which is the writing of the testament Progression which is the publication of it Consummation which is the death of the partie and when after the deuise the deuisor purchaseth other lands it caÌ„not 3. A differeÌ„ oâ— in the CoÌ„mon law where a man deuiseth a thing wherof he is not seised particularly and by name and where not be intended by any possibilitie that hee would haue them to passe by the deuise for there is nothing conteined in the will which doth purport such intent but it was held in Brettes case that if a man deuise land in certaintie as the mannor of Dale or white acre and he hath no interest nor possession in them at the time of the making of the will and after the doth purchase it in such case it shall passe to the deuisee for then it shall be taken that his intent was to purchase it as it is said 39. Henr. 6. 13. and it was likewise sayd that the statutes of 32. and 34. Henr. 8. required that the deuisors should bee seised of the land deuised at the time of the deuise for the words be Euerie person hauing or which after this acte shall haue c. a 10. Eli. ComÌ„ Brets case per Louel touts les Iust Nomom I pray you let me know more particularly what things may be deuised Codicgn A thing may be deuised which is not 4 That things which are not in esse at the time of the deuise made may be deuised in rerum natura at the time of the deuise if afterwarde it may be as the corne which shall grow in such a soyle or the lambes which shall come of his flocke of sheepe in such a field b Instit de legat §. ea quoque res ff de legat 1. l. quod in rerum but if the testator doe deuise tenne quarter of corne comming of the corne which shall growe in such a soyle or two tunnes of wine of his grapes in such a vineyard or tenne lambes of such a flock though so much corne or wine or so many laÌ„bes doe not arise of the thinges abouesaid yet the heire or executor is compellable by law to make them good integraliter because he may seeme to haue mencioned the soile the vineyard and the flocke rather by way of demonstration then by way of condition c l. quid testamento in prin ff de leg 1. l. Paulo Callimacho §. Iullanus Seuerus ff de legat 3. l. Lucius ff de alim leg but if the testator doe deuise certaine goods or a certaine summe of money to I. S. and in his life time after recouerie of his health he giueth the goods or payeth the money to the said I. S. now without any alteration of the deuise in the will the executors shall bee discharged of perfourming the deuise after the death of the testator d l. Lucius Titius in testamento in prin ff de legat 2. gl in Clem. dudum de Sepultur Angonomoph It is said in our bookes that if a 5 That the deuise of tenaÌ„t for terme of life or tenant iâ— dower of corne growing at the time of their death is good man which hath estate for life or tenaunt in dower doe deuise their corne growing vpon the lande at the time of their death this is a good deuise and hee in the reuersion shall not haue the Corne e 4 H. 3. Deuis 26. But if a man seised of lande in fee as in right of his wâ—fe doe lease the same land for yeares to a straunger and the lessee soweth the lande and after the woman dyeth the corne being not ripe in this case the lessee may deuise the corne growing vppon the lande and yet this estate is determined and it was certaine but a thing non-certaine was the cause of the determination of it f 7. E. 3. 67. 7. E. 4. 17. Park 99. sect 513. 10. E. 3. 29. And if a man bee seysed of lande in the right of his wife and sowe it ad deuiseth the corne growing vpon the lande and dyeth before it bee seuered the deuisee shall haue it and not the wife but otherwise it is of hearbes or meadowe growing vpon the lande and not seuered at the time of the death of the deuisour g 7. Ass pl. 16. And if tenaunt in taile of lande lease the lande for life and the lessee soweth the lande with Corne and the tenaunt in tayle dyeth and the issue recouereth in a Formedon in discender before the
a lease of a house so that the lessee may make his profit of the houses within it the lessee cannot in this case take downe or demolishe the houses nor make wast in them for the intent was not so a 17. E. 3. 17. but if the King graunt to me visum franciplegij in omnibus terris meis feadis I cannot haue this in any landes and tenements which I shall afterwards purchase b 38. H. 6. 10. But 4 Howe the â— Queens grants and licences shal be construed and interpreted if the king graunt to a man that he and his heires shal be quit of taxe for their landes which they haue this is a good graunt though there be no taxe due at the time of the graunt c Ibid And so is the Law of Tenths and fifteenes d 19. H. 6. 62. 21. H. 6. 43. 21. E. 4. 45. and he to whom the King graunteth a licence may not vary from the proper sense the significancy of the words e 18. E. 2. Fines 124. And if the king before the dissolution of Monasteries had licenced an Abbot and his Couent to make a feoffement if the Abbot onely had made it the feoffement had beene voide f 21. H. 7. 8. And 3. Ed. 3. the King licenced one to leuie a fine of the mannour of Dale to the intent to maintayne two Chaplaines and hee woulde haue leuied the fine omitting the Chapleines but was not suffered g 3. E. 3. 5. and 30. Edward 3. the licence was to leuie a Fine of the Mannour of Dale and hee woulde haue leuied the Fine with a foreprise or exception of certaine acres parcell of the Mannour rendering rent but was not admitted to it because it coulde not stande with the licence which was that all the Manour should bee charged with the rent h 30. E. 3. 17. So if the Queene licence one to make a Feoffement by deede he cannot make it without deede i 21. H. 7. 8. per Frowike and this Lawe holdeth likewise in a common persons case for if hee that hath a warrant of Attourney to deliuer seisin absolutely doe deliuer-seisin vpon condition this is a disseisin to the feoffour k 12. Ass pâ— 24 And a graunt is not to bee fauoured contrarie to the euident perspicuous sense of the words 5 That a graunt is not to be fauoured contrary to the manifest sense of the words For if a man graunt to an other a loade of wood to take in his soyle euery yeare and the grauntee surceaseth the two first yeares and the third yeare hee taketh three loade hee is a wronge doer for two of them so if a man graunt to an other a common for three beastes yearely and hee taketh nothing the two first yeares he shal not haue common for three beastes the third yeare l 27. H. 6. 10. The aduowson of the Hospitall of Saint Katherins is appendant to the Mannour of B. the Hospitall being voide the Queene graunteth manerium ac omnes aduocationes cum pertinentijs the present presentment doth not passe m 13. Eliz 300. Dyer for it is fructus aduocationis and not the aduowson it selfe n 11. Elizab. 283. Dyer Codicgn The words of a graunt are to bee taken most strictly against the grauntor because nn Phil. Deci. in Comm. ad Regul iur he might haue expressed his meaning in more full large and manifest words Nomom Nowe resolue me whether a graunt 4. Diuision that is not good at the first may be made good by matter ex post facto Anglonomoph In no sorte for if there bee 1 That by the common law a graunt that is not good at the first may not be made good by matter ex post facto neither by the Câ—uil Law Lorde and three iointenauntes and the Lorde graunteth the seruices of one of them to a straunger this is a voyde graunt thoughe the same tenant doe attourne and suruiue his compaignions For no attournement can make an euill graunt to bee good o 5. E. 3. 34. and if a man lease lande to the husbande and wife duringe their liues and after graunteth the reuersion of the lande which the husbande holdeth for terme of life and then attournement is had the graunte is voide and the attournement also p 13. E. 3. Bro Iointen 63. And if a man be bound to a FemÌ„ sole and a straunger releaseth to the obligour and after maryeth the feme yet the release is not good q 15. E. 3. FeoffemÌ„t 63. So it is if in auncient time a Monke Fryer or Cannon professed which was no Soueraigne of an house had graunted to one an annuitie this was a void graunt though he had bin after dereigned or made Soueraigne of the same house or some other r 2. R. 3. 5. Codign As that which is lawfully done cannot be made void to all intents so that which is altogether void at the beginning cannot be strengthned by continuance of time rr Phili. Decr. Comment ad reg iur Nomom Let me aske you this question Anglonomoph 5. Diuision 1 Whether a tenant at wil may graunt ouer his estate whether may a tenant at will graunt ouer his estate or no especially if he in the reuersion doe after agree to it Anglonomoph I thinke not for it is not properly an estate because it wanteth certaintie Å¿ 27. H. 6. 3. but if my 2 That the estate of the tenant at will is in maner no estate tenant at will be outed by a straunger hee may reenter without my commandement for the entre of a stranger doth not determine my will t 11. E. 4. 3. and an other reason why he cannot grant his estate is because his estate dependeth as well vpon his owne will as the will of the lessor and if he lease ouer the land his will as to that intent is determined and by consequent his estate u 22. E. 4. 5. per Brian and his estate is such a non-estate in the eye of Law that he cannot haue ayd of his lessor w 12. E. 4. 5. and if the heire accept a rent reserued vpon a lease at will made by his father this cannot make the lease good because it was void before no more then his acceptance of a rent reserued vpon a lease for yeres which is determined by reentre can make that lease good x 14. H. 8. 11. Codicgn The estate of such a tenant is none at all in our law vnlesse he should set downe his will in certaine who demiseth y l. qui se patris C. vnde liberi Canonologus So it is likewise in our Law z C. de summa tri side cathol l. 1. Nomom I will not insiste any more vpon this matter but wil passe to the consideration of bargaines and sales The third Dialogue of Bargaines and Sales NOmomat I will
retractetur l. ea quae §. quaed ff de cōtrahen emp. but if it bee a secrete fault then a distinction must be vsed for eyther it was in beginning and growing at the time of the sale so that it may easily be cured and yet not easily perceiued then the seller is not any way to be charged or els the secrete fault was some festered and inueterate disease and in such case the seller is to be charged n L. mortis C. de per com rei vend but if the thing that is sold be liquide and gustable and the buyer doth taste of it or if it be measurable and hee doth measure it as corne or if it be ponderable and he doth wey it as mettall or if he marke a beast which hee hath bought and the beast be afterward chaunged in all these cases the dammage resteth vpon 4. That whether the fault be Latens or Patens if the bargainor do warrant the thing sold to be without fault hee is bound by the warranty by the Ciuill law the buyer o L. 1. l. q◠si neque §. si ff de per com rei vend l. 2. C. eo but if the things aforesaid be not tasted measured weyed or marked but be sold at a venture as if a man sell all his wine or oyle in such a house and doth warrant it to be good and merchantable or if he warrant the beasts that he selleth to be sound the seller in such cases is punishable p l. si vna ff de per com rei vend but if he had not warrāted it then the lawe is otherwise q d. l. 1. §. 1. C. eo l. quod saepe §. in his ff eo Anglonomoph In these cases which you haue now put our Lawe as I take it differeth very little or nothing from yours for whereas you 5. That bargaines sales matters in writing and obligatory may be auoyded by alleaging that they were made or done per menasse or by duresse say that a bargaine or sale enforced by terror may be auoyded in our Lawe euen matters in writing obligatory may be for the same cause defeated and frustrated and if a man seised of an acre of lande doe giue it in taile by deed and maketh a letter of Attourney to deliuer seisin and al this is done by duresse of imprisonment and liuerie of seisin is made this is a disseisin to the donor and the deed of gift and liuerie may by Law be auoided r 41. E. 3. 9. 2. E. 4. 19. per Littl. Park tit Graunts Sect. 17. and if a man menasse me to kill me if I wil not grant to him an annuitie of xx s. for doubt of death I grant it vnto him this graunt is voidable ſ 11. R. 2. Duresse 13. But if a man grant an annuitie to an other by threatning him that he wil cary away his goods whereupō he granteth vnto him the annuitie this grāt is not voidable by reason of such menacing because he may haue an actiō to recouer the goods if they be takē away t 7. E. 4. 21. Park tit Grāts Sect. 18. but a threatning of battery is a good cause to auoid a deed u 4. E. 2. Duresse 9. and so is the threatning of imprisonment a good cause to auoid a bonde x 8. H. 6. 12. but otherwise it is of a threatning to burne my house a 39. H. 6. 51. and a duresse or menacing at one place shall auoid an obligation made at an other place b 38. H. 6. 13. ◠Moyle 33. H. 6 24. 2. H. 5. 10. as to that which you haue spoken of fraud deceite in bargaines and sales the warranting of a thing to be good and sound which is nought corrupt I could put many cases agreing with your assertiōs diuersities 6. That by the Common law a warrantie made vpō the concluding of a bargaine and sale doth binde otherwise it is if the warrantie be made after the bargaine concluded If a mā sell vnto one certaine cloth warrant it to be of such a length and it is not of that lēgth he which buieth the cloth may haue an actiō of disceit against him by vertue of the warrātie but if the warrantie be made at some other time after the bargain he may not haue a writ of disceite c Fitzh N. B. 98. K. if a ma sell to an other seeds warrant thē to be of a certaine coūtrie if they be not so a writ of disceit will lie otherwise it had bin if he had warrāted that they should haue growne or if he should warrant that the horse which he selleth should go 50. miles in a day and a writ of deceite lieth for selling corrupt victuale without warrātie but not for selling rottē sheepe though it be with warrātie the warrāting of a thing to 7. That the warranting of a thing which is euident to the sense is no cause to bring a writte of disceite by the Common law be black which is blew where the colours is euident to sense is no cause of bringing a writ of disceit but is merely void otherwise it is if the buyer be blind or the thing that is bought be absēt d 11. E. 4. 7. 13. H. 4. 1. if a man sell a horse which hath a disease in his body or if he sel certain quarters of corne which is ful of grauel a writ of disceite will lie without warrātie e 20. H. 6. 36. ◠Paston 11. H. 6. 22. if one sell to an other certaine tūnes of wine warrāt thē to be good they be corrupt the vendee may haue an actiō vpō the case against the vendor f Fitz. N. B. 94. the actiō wil lie without warrātie g 7. H. 4. 14. according to the opiniō of some but M. Fitz. saith that there ought to be a warrātie or els no actiō will lie for in such case his taste may be his iudge h Fitz. N. B. 94. C. but where it is with warrātie the writte must say that the defend at the time of the warrantie made knew that the wine which he sold was corrupted i 9. H. 6. 53. Nomom You haue spokē enough of this matter 5. Diuision now shew me whether by a bargain sale of of the profites of land the land it selfe do passe Anglono The grant or bargaine sale of the 1. That by the Common law the graunt or sale of the profits of land is the grant of the lād it self profits of the land is the grant of the lād it self k 45. Ed. 3. Grants 90. 4. Eliz. 219. Dy. if a mā do lease to one an acre of lād for life reseruing to himselfe the herbage this reseruation is void for he hath reserued the same thing in substance l 38. H. 6.
with a kisse greeted such as made the like protestation of obedience and loyaltie vnto him e Plutarth in Alexand. and long before that as it seemeth it was vsed in Iudaea for vpoÌ„ these words of the Psalme ee Psalm 2. r. 12. kisse the sonne our english glosse addeth by way of interpretation in signe of homage and Tremellius and Iunius in signe of fealty sithence these times this respectiue humiliation hath spred it selfe into other countries and territories for the Duke of Gelderland did conceiue an oath in these words to Charles King of Fraunce Ego deuenio vassallus ligeus Caroli regis Francorum pro ratione quinquaginta millium scutorum auri ante festum diui Rhemigij mihi soluendorum c. e Bodin lib. 1. de repub c. 9. Nomom I desire greatly to know the originall 3. Diuision and first blossoming of other seignories Anglonomoph The most common seignorie of 1. What a Manor is and whereof it coÌ„sisteth accompt which wee haue in our Law is a seignorie by reason of a Manor which may be thus defined A Manor it an inheritance of ancient continuance coÌ„sisting of demesnes and seruices perquisites casualties things appendant and regardant customes liberties c. Nomoma What do so many things concurre to make a Manor will not demesnes and seruices serue Anglono Yes demesnes seruices will suffice as material causes to make a Manor f 26. H. 8. 4. but it is a naked Manor which hath nothing els Nomom I would gladly heare somewhat of the commencement and first creation of a Mannor Anglonomo M. Parkins doth very well originally 2. The originall of a Manor describe it in this manner The originall of a Manor was when the King did giue a thousand acres of lande or a greater or lesse parcell to one of his subiectes and his heires to holde of him and his heyres and the donee edifieth a house vpon this lande as his mansion place and of 20. acres or lesse or greater parcell he doth enfeoffe a straunger before the Statute of Quia empto terrar to holde of him and of his heires as of the same house by the plowing of 10. acres of arable laÌ„d parcell of that which remaineth in his owne possession and enfeoffeth and other of an other parcell to hold of him by carying ordure to his arable land and enfeoffeth a third man of a third parcell to goe with him in the warre against the Scots and so by continuance of time saith he a Manor is made g Park Reseruat fol. 128. Sect. 670. Yet by his fauour somewhat els goeth to the making of a Manor namely suite of Court at his house or mansion place h 33. H. 8. Br. Comprise 31. Mannor 5. and this suit must be the suite of more freeholders then one so that some doubt may be made of M. Kitchins assertion wheÌ„ he saith that in some Manors there be no tenaÌ„ts but copiholders and yet in such Mannors be Court barons i Kitch Court Leete Baron tit Manerâ—um fol. 4. for if all the freeholds do eschete vnto the Lord beside one or if he purchase al but one the maÌ„nor is extinct for it can not be a maÌ„nor vnlesse there be a Court baron belonging to it and a Court baron must be helde before suitors and not before one suitor therfore one freehold can not make a mannor k Br. Ca. Sect. 210. 23. H. 8. Br. Court baron 22. in fi 33. H. 8. Br. Suit 17. Nomom You haue well delared vnto me the 4 Diuision beginnings of Seignories and mannors but haue there bene no lawes made for the strengthning preseruing of theÌ„ for me thinks they be good meanes to increase support the wealth puissance and florishing estate of the Realme Anglono Yes our law in this case hath not either sluÌ„berd or winked For in the ancieÌ„t Statute of Magna Charta it is prouided that Nullus liber homo Statutes made for the preseruation of seignoties and Mannors det de caetero amplius de terra sua vel veÌ„dat de caetero quà m vt de residuo terrae suae possit sufficienter fieri domino feodi seruitium ei debitum quod pertinet ad feoduÌ„ illud l Magna charta c. 31. which statute as M. StaÌ„ford auoucheth is but a confirmation of the CoÌ„mon law he a most diligent and exquisite searcher of the reasons of Lawe so that I may boldly speake of him that which I shall not say impudently vntruly Faelix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas sifteth out the reason of this Lawe For saith he if one that held by Knights seruice might haue bene suffered to haue aliened the greatest part of his land he would haue aliened the same peraduenture to holde of him but in Socage or by some small rent and then hauing so little a liuelod lefte to himselfe how had he bene able to haue done the seruice of a Knight or man of warre or what should his Lord haue had in warde to haue found one to haue performed the seruice surely little or nothing m Stamf. praerog c. 7. tit Alienati sans licence But it seemeth doubtfull notwithstanding the Statute of Magna Chart. whether the tenaunt might alien his whole tenancie or not whereupon the Statute of Quia emptores terrarum was made which permitted euerie free man to sell his lands or tenements or any part therof at his pleasure to hold of the chief Lord by the same seruice that the feoffer held prouided alwaies that by any such sale there come no lands to mortmain This Statute as M. Stamford noteth remedieth the mischief which was before found in the wardship but not the other mischiefe touching the defence of the Realme for when one mans liuing is so dismembred neuer a one of the feoffees nor the feoffor is able to doe the seruice of a warrior for want of liuelode there being so little quantity of land in euery of their hands yea much more vnable sithence this statute is the feoffor then before for before when he gaue it to hold of himselfe he reserued somewhat in lieu of the land which went from him whereas now he can reserue nothing of common right n Stamf. ibid. And the land which he retaineth in his owne hands may perhaps be of small value Nomom What is the most generall and most common seruice of all 5. Diuision Anglonomoph Fealtie for that is incident to euery 1. Fealtie is the most generall seruice in the Common law 2. And in the Ciuill law tenure vnles it be tenure in frankalmoign o Littlet lib. 2 c. 3. Sect. 13. c. 5. Sect. 22. Codicgn So it is with vs for fealtie which of vs is called fidelitas is due to euerie Lord to whom any seruice is to be performed and euery â— That by the Ciuill law the Common law and the Canon law a
religious man ought to doe fealtie tenaÌ„t ought to do such seruice yea though he be a religious man and professed vnder rule p ca. vnico tit de natura feudi Et tit qualiter vassall iur deb sideli domi Et in ca. vnico tit quib mod feud amittatur Et in quib causis feudum amitt tit quae â—uit pri causa benef amit Canonolog But such a religious man may not say Ego deuenio homo vester nor humiliate himself to execute the rite of homage q C. venieÌ„s C. ex diligenti de Simon grauem de excess praelat cap. fin de re Iud Anglonomo By our Law he may do homage but may not say to his Lord ego deuenio homo vester because he hath professed himself to be onely God his man but he may say I doe vnto you homage and to you shal be faithfull and loyall r Littlet lib. 2. c. 1. Sect. 2. Nonoma Shewe me I pray you some speciall 6. Diuision kinds of these seruices that I may know them morefully and more distinctly Codicgn Seruices are diuersified according 1. The diuerse kindes of seruices in the ciuill Law and their definitions to the qualities of the persons to whom they are to be done if it be to bee done to an Emperour it is to be tearmed an Imperiall seruice if to a King a regall seruice Å¿ Cap. 1. de feud march ducatâ— in ca. 1. quis dicat dux comes marchio if to Religious persons Ecclesiasticall if to Lay men secular t Tit. de his qui feud dar pos tit Episcop vel Abbat but when it is to bee done to a lesser estate then to an Emperour or King as to a Duke Marquesse or Earle then it is called feudum honoratum sometime land is giuen by inferior persons meaner men without expressing any seruice and theÌ„ the Law intendeth that fealty onely is to be done this is called FrancuÌ„ or LiberuÌ„ u Ca. 1. de no. form fidel sometime it is giuen with reseruation of speciall seruice that is feudum non nobile a Ca. fâ— de capilan qui cur vendid somtime it is giueÌ„ in perpetuuÌ„ sometime but for tearme of life and then it is called Perpetuum vel temporale b De feud march in prin de alien feud in fine de feud guard castald But though by the oath of fealtie the vassalle be bound to serue his Lord in warre yet this is limited to such case where the warre is not notoriously vniust or vnlawfull for if it be otherwise though hee doe him no seruice in warre yet he shall not forfeite his tenement c In cap Domino guerram in prin in tit hic sini lex deinde c. neither is he bound to do his seruice to his Lord if his Lorde bee excommunicate or bannished vntill he haue obteined absolution or a recalling from bannishment but d D. cap. Domino guerraÌ„ in sin in a iust warre the vassalle is bound to helpe his Lorde against euery other person who is not the Lorde of the vassalle yea euen against his father brother or sonne Anglonomoph Seruices in our Law are of diuerse 2. The diuerse kindes of seruices in the Common law and their definitions sorts some being more noble and some lesse noble of these which are more noble some belong to the king and some both to the king to subiects of these that belong to the king some be domestical only as Petite Sergeancie some bellicall onely as Knights seruice in Capite some both domesticall bellicall as grand sergeancie some of the more noble seruices belong vnto subiects as well as to the king as knights seruice and homage these which be lesse noble may be diuided into two braÌ„ches for either they are ingenuous or seruile the ingenuous are of two sorts either performable by particular men or a certaine people as fealtie rent seruice the like which make socage tenure or els performable by a certaine people onely as burgage the seruile or base seruice is villenage Of all these seruices saue such only as haue bin before described I will speake somewhat seuerally briefly and in order Petite Sergeancie is where a man holdeth his land of the King paying yerely vnto him a Bow or a speare or a dagger or a launce or a spurre of golde c. e Littlet lib. 2. ca. 9. sect ' 1. Knights seruice in Capite is where a man holdeth his landes or tenements of the king as of his crowne immediatly ab antiquo by doing some warlike seruice Graund sergeancie is where a man holdeth his lands or tenements of the king as of his Crowne immediatly by doing some speciall seruice to the King in person as by carying his banner or launce or by being his marshall or sewer or caruer or butler c. f Litt ' li. 2. ca. 8. sect ' 1. 23. H. 3. Gard 148 of homage and fealtie hath beene spoken before Rent seruice is where the tenant holdeth his lande of his Lorde by a certaine rent for which if it be behinde at the day wherein it ought to be paied the Lord may distreigne for it of common right Burgage is where the tenants of an auncient borough doe holde landes within the Borough of the King or some other person as of his borough by a certaine rent g Litt ' lib. 2. c. 10. sect ' 1. 2. Villenage is where a man holdeth of his Lorde either by doing vnto him some partiticuler base seruice and such a one is called a tenant by villenage or by doing generally whatsoeuer base seruice his Lorde will commaund and impose vpon him such a tenant he is tearmed in our Law a villaine h Litt. lib. 2. c 11. sect ' 1. 2 This miserable estate of villenage had his beginning soone after the diluge and now by the consent of all nations it is ratified for the West Indians though they haue 3 The original of villenage and the nature thereof no knowledge of diuine or humane Lawes yet bondmen they haue and the Mahometistes make Christians their bondeslaues the Portugallians make villaines of the Mahometistes which they sell by companies as flockes of sheepe in the market i Bodin lib. 1. de repub c. 5. The Romains had power by their law to sel or kil their villains k Tacit. li. 14. but for mittigation of cruelty the Law Petronia was made whereby it was forbidden that none should put his villaine to death without cause which law was executed by Nero l Senec. lib. 3. de benefic after by Adrianus m Sparcian in Adrian but our law a more concionable fauorer of life hath restrained the hands of the Lord from the bloudshed of his villaine and from the mayming of him n Litâ— ' lib. 2. c. 11. sect ' 32. hauing regard to
liuerie onely transferreth the land otherwise it had beene if the word exchaunge had beene vsed in the deede and the estate which the parties are to haue in the land exchaunged ought to be equal 3. That the estates most be equall and Choke saith that both the things exchanged ought to be in esse at the time of the exchaunge and therefore an exchange of land for rent granted de nouo is not good but an exchaunge betwixt 4. That the things exchaūged must be in Esse a rent and a common which are in esse at the time of the exchaunge is good and so it is of land and rent c 9. E. 4. 21. p Brian Choke Nedham And according to his opinion an exchange of the right which the dissesee hath to the land wherof the disseisin is committed for an acre of land in which the disseisor hath right is no good exchaunge d 3. E. 4. 10. p Choke And where the worde exchaunge is mentioned though the conueyance be but an Indenture of couenants yet it shall amount to a good exchaunge for an Indenture of couenants was made betwixt a Prior and the Maister of Gunnell hall in Cambridge that the Maister should haue three acres of land to him and to his successors in perpetuall exchaunge for one chamber of two chambers to be assigned by the said Maister at his election to the said Prior and his successors this hath beene held to be a good exchaunge though it be by way of couenant e 9. E. 4. 38. And though it be auouched for lawe that if by a deed of composition it be agreed betwixt two that the one shall haue such landes in allowance of other lands belonging to him that this is a good exchaunge f 3. E. 3. 19. yet I doubt whether an exchange may be accōplished by such counteruaileable words but a man may 5. That an exchaunge is good though the one parte of it doe mure by way of extinguishment giue land in exchāge for a release which cannot mure but only by way of extinguishmēt though there be some authoritie against it g 7. E. 3. 37. therefore Nortons opiniō is iustly denied by Thorpe wheras he held that in euery exchaūge there must be a mutuall transmutation of the possession h 16. E. 3. Exchaunge 2. for if a man release to an other his estouer of wood which he is to take yeerely in his wood in exchaunge for land giuen to him in exchaunge for the same release this is a good exchange though the release take effect by way of extinguishmēt but it is as great a profite and aduauntage to the tenant to be discharged of the estouers as if so much had bene graunted vnto him out of an other mans wood i Park tit Exchaun 53. 31. E. 1. Exchange 16. and the Law well perceiueth the profite which a man may haue by way of extinguishment for if the father being tenant in taile doe alien the land entailed with warrantie and hath a rent charge in fee issuing out of the lande of his Sonne which doth discend vnto the sonne this is a good assets in value notwithstanding the extinguishment k 31. E. 3. Garrantie 29. Nomomath Whether may Ecclesiasticall benefices 2. Diuision promotions and liuings bee exchaunged or no. Canonolog The incumbents may not by their 1. That incūbents may not exchaunge their benefices by the Canon law sole authoritie chaunge their benefices but they may exchaunge them Interueniente authoritate Episcoporum ad quos pertinet collatio but there is a question in the glosse whether the Chapiter 2. That the Chapiter may warrant permutations sede vacāte in such benefices wherein they haue interest or authoritie may authorise such permutations sede vacante l C. quaesitū de rer permut glos in Clem vnica E. tit and it resolueth briefly that in such things wherein they haue a common collation either by reason of authoritie or by reason of interest and consent it may authorise exchanges sede vacante but in other cases not m Glos in d. Clem. vnic super verbo Conferantur Anglonomophylax The reason in our Lawe 3. That by the Common law Ecclesiasticall persons their patrons and ordinaries ioyning together can not make any good exchange of Ecclesiasticall benefices wherefore such ecclesiasticall persons nor their patrons and ordinaries though they all agree can not exchaunge the inheritances of spirituall liuings is because the statute strictly prouideth that no alienation be made in mortmaine for a thing which was amortised before may be again amortised and therefore if a religious person do appropriate a Church which is of his owne presentation without the kings licence it is forfeited though it were amortised before n 19. E. 3. Mortmain 8. and in such case where one Abbot did alien to an other the collusion was to bee enquired of as well as in the alienation of land made by a secular man to a religious corporation o 16. Assis pl. 1. for the wordes of the Statute of Mortmaine bee very 4. That the statute of Mortmain is most strict and pregnant in wordes strong and large against such purchasors which are thus Prouisum est quòd nullus religiosus emere vel sub colore donationis aut termini aut alterius tituli cuiuscunque ab aliquo recipere aut arte vel ingenio sibi appropriare praesumat per quod terrae tenementa huiusmodi ad manum mortuam quocunque modo deueniant p Statut. de religios 7. E. 1. Mortmain 3. and therefore the case was that a femme sole purchased lande in fee and tooke to husbād the villaine of a Bishop which he had in right of his Bishoprike and the Bishop entred and this was adiudged a mortmain for according to Wickinghams opiniō the words of the Statute of Mortmaine are quocunque modo otherwise it shall be if the tenant of the Bishop do die without heire q 41. E. 3. 21. but 19. Henr. 6. the contrarie is held to be Lawe but if the villaine himselfe purchase lande it is helde there that in such case a Bishop or an Abbot can not enter r 19. H. 6. 56. but Thorpes opinion is 41. E. 3. that though hee may not enter in the case aforesaid yet hee may reteigne the land against the villaine and the king may afterward ratifie his estate which is no more in plaine tearmes then that an estate so gained is voidable onely and not voide and as to the exchaunge of benefices betwixt parson and parson it is seuerely punished by edict of Parliament in our realme ſ 31. Eliz. Nomomathes I will not stay longer vpon the inquirie of exchaunges for you haue opened vnto mee the nature of them and how farre they extende in these few cases now let vs passe to a larger examination of the doubts and pointes of deuises and legacies The
a good deuise f 21. R. 2. Deuis 27. but now such a deuise is made voide by the statute of 23. H. 8. cap. 10. but before that statute it appeareth by the booke of 37. H. 6. that vpon a gift made to the parishioners 2 That by the common law and by the statute of 23. H. 8. such a deuise is void of such a parish without naming them the Churchwardens might haue an action g 37. H. 6. 3â— but theÌ„ the gift must haue bin of a personal thing for of inheritance of land they cannot take to the vse of the Church h 12. H. 7. 27. but if a man in auncient time had giuen his landes or his goods deo Ecclesiae sanct ' Petr ' Westimonast ' this had ben a good deuise because the Church is not the house nor the walles but the entier spiritual house that is the Abbot and the Couent and because they may take by such a gift it is good but if the Abbot were dead at the time of the gift it is not good be cause the CoueÌ„t is not persona capax but a church 3 What is meant by a Church parochiall according to Rolfes opinion parochiall by Rolfes opinion as to the endowement of it with lande cannot otherwise be intended but a house made of stones walles and roofe which cannot take by any gift or feoffement and so it is of a Church conuentual which lacketh a soueraigne i 8. H. 5. 4. per Babi Rolfe Nomom Suppose that two testaments be exhibited 11. Diuision to the ordinary which were made in one day conteining seuerall summes to the same deuisees bequethed whether shall they both be approued and the legacies of both stand good Codicgn These legacies onely shal stand good 1 That by the ciuil law where two testameÌ„ts conteigne in them seueral summes that which conteineth the lessee shal staÌ„d but by the coÌ„mon law the later which do conteigne in them a lesser summe k l. Sempronius Procul ff de legat 2. Anglonomoph In our Law we haue a case that if a man make a testament and in it he maketh one onely man his executor and then he maketh an other testament and in it he maketh him and a stranger executors and the first testament is proued that onely shall stande l 2. H. 5. 8. but by other authoritie the later onely shall take place what summes soeuer they conteigne ll 4. H. 7. 13. Nomomat Say that an oxe is deuised to one and 13. Diuision the oxe dyeth without any default in the executor whether is the skinne or hide of the oxe due to the deuisee or no Codicgn By our Lawe it is not due m l. mortuo boue ff de legat 2. for the 1 That by the Ciuil law if an oxe be deuised and he dye the skin is not due to the deuisee thing deuised that is the oxe did perish and was non ens before the skinne were taken off and the skin was not taken from an oxe but from a carcasse Anglonomoph It seemeth in that case that the 2 That by the common law it semeth to be due otherwise it should be if there had bin an exception of the hide deuisee shall haue the hide for it is parcel of the oxe and the oxe was an entier thing but if hee had giuen the oxe excepting the hide that perhaps would amount to a seueraÌ„ce in law so that the oxe liuing should haue belonged to the deuisee but being killed the flesh should belong to the deuisee the hide to the executor of the deuisor and if a man make a lease of land excepting the trees which grow vpon the lande the trees are seuered in Law for hee hath no reuersion of them and if he sell them and after the sale make a feoffement the feoffee shall not haue them because they were seuered by the vendition n 20. H. 6. 22. Nomomat Put case that I. S. doe borow a C. 13. Diuision li. of I. N. and for the sure repayment thereof he bindeth all his landes and goods by recognisans of statute Marchant to the said I. N. after he deuiseth all his landes to the recognisee and dyeth the recognisans is forfaited the recognisee bringeth an action of dette and recouereth against the executors and hath execution of the goods of the testator by Fierifacias and then he claimeth the land by vertue of the deuise whether is his claime good or no 1 That if the recognisor deuise all his goods to the reâ—onusee yet he shall haue execution of the land Codicgn I thinke he may claime the lande also if it may not be prooued by circumstances or directly that the land was deuised vnto him in satisfaction of the debt and vpon condition implyed that he should not alter the propertie of the goods by execution o l. creditoreÌ„ ff de legat 2. Anglonomoph I doe not perceiue any repugnancie in our Lawe to that which you haue saide Nomomath If he had made his creditour his executour in this case what woulde then haue followed Anglonomoph Then the debt had bin extinct p 11. H. 4. pl. 31. 2 That if the obligee make the obligor his executor the det is extinct for if two be bound to one in a certaine summe of money and the obligee maketh one of them his executor this is a release in law of the bond and debt to them both q 21. E. 4. 81. so if one make his dettor and an other his executours and die in this case if the executor who was not indebted suruiue he shall not haue an action of debt against the executour of his coexecutour although the partie indebted did not administer in his life time for the action was once extinguished and determined for no action can be brought but in the name of them both r 20. E. 4. 17. 21. E. 4. 3. 21. H. 7. 31. per Fineux but if one that is indebted make his creditour and an other his executours the creditour may haue an action if he doe not administer Å¿ 8. E. 4. 3. per Brian but when the testator is indebted to me and maketh me his executor I may deteigne the goods for my bebt so that it seemeth that though the action be extinct in regarde of the testatour yet the debt is still in esse in respect of straungers t 7. H. 4. 18. 27 H. 6. en Scire fac ' 7. Eliz. ComÌ„ Greysbrookes case 275. Codicgn When the creditour maketh the debtor his executor by the executorship the debt is confounded and because of impossibilitie in Lawe forsomuch as the executor may not bring an action of debt against himselfe being one and the same person the obligation therefore is by secreate act of Law disanulled u Philip. Deci ad reg iur Nomom Now I will put you a case which is
o 37. H. 6. 30. but if a man seise in an other right then as deuisee then he neede not depend vpon the deliuerie of the executors therefore the case was 9. E. 4. that an action of dette was brought against one as executor in London and the defendant said that the testator did giue vnto him certaine goods by his deed he shewed in particular what goods they were the testator being at the time of the gift in the village of B. in the countie of Essex that he suffered the goods to be in the possess of the testator vntill his death at London and after the death of the testator he tooke thē absque hoc that he did administer as executor the whole Court helde that the Iurors ought to find this matter of the gift of the goods vpō paine of attaint p 9. E. 4. 40. but where a man ought to take a thing by the deliuery of an other he taketh it of his owne head he is a trespassor and therefore if a man graūt to an other an estouer of wood to be taken by the view deliuery of his Bailie if hee take it without the deliuerie of the Bailie the grauntor may haue an action of trespasse against him Quare vi armis q 8. E. 3. 422. Nomomathes Suppose that a legacie of monie 18. Diuision is deuised to a man in regard of his wife and the testator dieth whether may the husband in this case demaund the legacie without naming the wife Codicgn By our Lawe the husband may demaund 1. That by the Ciuill law the husbande may demaund a legacy due to the wife without naming the wife it without naming the wife r L. Titio centum §. Titio genero ff de condit demonst Anglonomoph I see little reason but that the husband only may demaūd it in his owne name he being the sole deuisee and the thing deuised being a personall thing but if it had bene a reall thing and the wife had bene interested in it then the law would be otherwise Nomoma I pray you put me some cases touching this difference that I may better vnderstande your meaning Anglonomoph The writ of mesne because it 2. That in the Common law there is a diuersitie as touching bring ing of actions in the wifes name where the matter of the writ is real and where it is personall is in the realty ought alwaies to suppose the husbād and wife to be mesnes ſ 13. R. 2. Briefe 642. but in a writ of trespasse it hath bene helde a good declaration if the plaintife alledge that the defendant entred into his mannor of Dale though he haue nothing in the mannor but in right of his wife for this is a a personall wrong done vnto the husband t 4. E. 4 31. and by Danbyes opinion the husband taketh the profites of the land in his owne right u Ibid. per Danby so that it can not be law which is said 21. R. 2. that an actiō of trespasse for trees cut in the land of the wife must be brought as well in the wifes name as in the husbands w 21. R. 2. Briefe 933. and the contrarie is helde for Law 6. H. 4. and 47. E. 3. because as M. Finchden saith well the husband onely may release the dammages when they are recouered x 6. H. 4. 10. 47. E. 3. 9. per Finch neither may Husseyes opinion 7. H. 7. bee admitted for Lawe where he saith that the writte may be brought in both their names a 7. H. 7. 2. ◠Hussey in an actiō of dett brought by the husband vpon an obligation made to him and to his wife the writte may bee brought in the husbands name onely b 12. R. 2. Br̄e 639. and so where a lease is made for yeares rendring rent by the husband and the wife of the lande of the wife the action of dette must bee brought in the name of the husbande onely c 7. E. 4. 5. howsoeuer 2. R. 2. be to the contrarie that in a writte concerning a chattell reall they may ioyne d 2. R. 2. Brief 37. but where the husband is seised of a Seignorie in the right of his wife a mā may not make conusans as baily to the husband but as baily to them both e 12. R. 2. Auowrie 88. but that is because the conusans and auowrie in such case is en le droit f 48. E. 3. 8. ◠Finch but as to such things which concerne the persō of the wife immediatly there the writte must be brought in both their names and therfore the husband cannot sue a writte of appeale 3. That where the wronge doth immediatly concerne the person of the wife the wise must of necessitie be named for the rape of his wife without naming the wife g 8. H. 4. 21. 1. H. 6. 1. 10. H. 4. Br. Baron fem 34. whereas they brought an action of batterie for the beating of them both the writte was adiudged good for the batterie of the wife but not as to the batterie of the husband h 9. E. 4. 54. and the husbande and the wife shall both bring an action of trespasse for the taking away of the goods of the wife before the marriage i 21. H. 6. 33. but in a writte of detinue of charters against husband and wife the declaration was vpon a trouer and the writte was abated k 13. R. ◠Briefe 644. but a writte of couenant was brought by the husband and the wife because the defendant leased vnto them lande for tearme of yeares by deed afterward outed thē and the writ was awarded to be good for if the husband die the woman shall haue the tearme l 47. E. 3. 12. and in this case they were both parties to the couenant and by the bookes of 6. E. 4. 17. E. 4. an action of dette for the arrerages of a rent reserued vpon a lease for yeares made vnto the husband and the wife shall be brought against them bothe and so shall a writte of waste for the wife cannot waiue the lease during the life of the husband m 6. E. 4. 10. 17. E. 4. 7. and 8. Rich. 2. an action vpon the statute of Labourers was brought against husband and wife supposing that the wife had couenanted with the plaintife to be dāsell or waiting womā to his wife for a yeare that she departed out of seruice within the yeare the writ was awarded to be good being brought against them both n 8. R. 2. Laborers 59. Nomoma No more of this matter let me aske 19. Diuision you farther If the testator do deuise to one within age his maintenance to bee giuen allowed him by his executor vntill he come to ripenes of age how shal these words ripenes of age be vnderstood whether of age of
of debt or couenant vpon any especialtie made to the plaintife or plaintifes or vpon any contract supposed to be made between the plaintife or plaintifes and any person or persons or any action bill or plaint of detinue of any goods or chattels where the plaintife or plaintifes shall suppose that the propertie belongeth to them or any of them or any action bill or plaint of Accompt in the which the plaintife or plaintifes suppose the defendant or defendants to be their Bailife or Bailifes receiuer or receiuers of their Manor mease money or goods to yeeld accompt or any action bill or plaint vpon the case or vpon any statute for any offence or wronge personal immediatly supposed to be done to the plaintife or plaintifs and the plaintife or plaintifes in any such kind of action bill or plaint after appearance of the defendant or defendants be nonsuted or that any verdict happen to passe by lawfull trial against the plaintife or plaintifes in any such action bill or plaint that then the defendant or defendants in euerie such action bill or plaint shall haue iudgement to recouer his costes against euerie such plaintife or plaintifes e 23. H. 8. c. 15. Rast Dammages 6. Likewise whereas as you saie that the partie plaintife ought to be warie least hee 6. Suite must not be mainteined before an incompetent iudge according to the common law cause the defendant to appeare before an incoÌ„petent iudge that agreeth fullie with the common lawe for if a man doe sweare vnto me that he will enfeoffe me of such land before such a daie if he do not enfeoffe me I may not sue him in the Ecclesiasticall Court Pro laesione fidei because the acte which is to be done is a temporal acte and ought to be tried by the Common law and therefore if the partie be sued in the Ecclesiasticall Court for it he may haue a prohibition f Fitzh N. B. 43. D. so if a man deuise to one landes or tenements deuiseable the deuisee may not sue for these lands in the ecclesiasticall Court but if he make a deuise of goods or chattels reall as of an estate for tearme of yeares or of a warde for such he may 7. The seueral iurisdiction of diuerse courtes is described sue in that Court g Fitz. 161. F. and if a trespasse bee done vpon the gleabe of a beneficed person this must be tried at the Common lawe h 19. H. 6. 20. but if the termor of certaine land doe deuise his croppe and die the spiritual Court shal hold plea for this crop i 8. H. 3. Prohibit 19. but if a man sue in the spirituall Court for a rent reserued vpoÌ„ a lease for tithes or offerings a prohibition lieth for this is a lay rent k 44. E. 3. 32. and a man may sue a prohibition directed to the Sheriffe that the Sheriffe shall not permit nor suffer the Queenes lay people and subiects to come to any place at the citation of Bishops ad facienduÌ„ aliquas recognitiones vel sacramentuÌ„ praestanduÌ„ nisi in causis matrimonialibus testameÌ„tarijs l Fitzh N. B. 41. A. but if a testameÌ„t beare date at Cane in Normandie yet it may bee proued in England the executors may thereupon haue an action m 18. E. 2. Testam 6. a testameÌ„t shewed vnder the seale of the Ordinaire is not trauersable n 36. H. 6. 31. Paâ—k tit Testam furthermore if one which is of the Queenes houshold sue an other which is not of her Maiesties houshold in the court of Marshalsie the defendaÌ„t may plead to the iurisdictioÌ„ of the Court and if the Court wil not allow this exception he may haue a writ of Error and the iudgement giuen in the Marshalsie may bee reuersed in the Kings bench o 18. E. 4. 22. 19. E. 4. 2. 4. 7. in Scir fa. inter Prior. de Merton Prior. de Bingh per Littlet and if one of the Queenes houshold sue an other of the same houshold and the plaintife is put out of seruice depending the plea the other may shewe this and abate the writte but otherwise it is if the defendant be put out of seruice p Lib. de diuers des Courts fol. 102. b. and if a man be impleaded in the CoÌ„mon place for lands within the cinque portes the tenant may shewe to the Court that the lande is within the Cinque ports and by this plea the Court shall bee outed of iurisdiction but if the tenant do plead a plea in barre which is founde against him so that the demaundant hath iudgement to recouer the land this iudgement shall binde the tenant foreuer q Lib. de diuers des courts 107. and so it is of landes in auncient demesne if a writte bee brought for them in the Common place if the tenant appeare and plead in barre and take no exception to the iurisdiction and the plea is found against him so that the demaundant recouereth the tenant shall not reuerse this by a writte of Error because hee might haue taken in time exception to the iurisdiction of the Court and that should haue beene allowed r Ibidem but the lorde may reuerse this iudgement by a writ of disceite and make the land auncient demesne as it was before Å¿ Ibid. 16. E. 2. Continuall Claime 10. 11. H. 4. 86. 7. H. 4. 44. 8. H. 4. 24. 17. E. 3. 41. 26. E. 3. 33. now I come to the citation â— That the summons of the partie defendant is necessarily exacted by the common law or summons of the partie defendaunt which you haue prooued to bee necessarie by the Ciuill lawe and I will likewise prooue that it is by the Common lawe necessarilie exacted In a writte of Trespasse the Sheriffe returned Non est inuentus wherefore a Capias issued that the defendaunt might bee taken who afterwarde came into the Court and said that hee was sufficient and might haue beene summoned and prayed a writte to make the Sheriffe to come to aunswere to the King and to the partie for his false returne and hee had it t 31. E. 3. Processe 55. and in an attachment vpon a prohibition the Sheriffe returned Non est inuentus the plaintife prayed a Capias to an other Sheriffe in an other Countie but the Clarkes said that he ought not to haue any other processe then an attachment in the other Countie because it may bee that hee hath assets in the other Countie u 13. E. 3. Processe 34. by which hee may be summoned and so 11. H. 4. it is said that in an action of dette or trespasse a Capias will not lie against an Earle or any of like estate because it is to bee intended that they haue assets whereby they may bee summoned and brought to their answere x 11. H. 4. 15. per Hals and in a writte against P. and T.