County where he is Iustice Power lost and he takes him in the other County In this case he is his prisoner in the County where he takes him and ought there to be imprisoned and he cannot send or convey him to the Gaol of the County where he committed the felony for he is not his prisoner there and being out of his proper County his authority ceaseth as to that other County So if the Marshal hold plea of a thing done out of the verge or the Admiral of a thing done in the body of the County it shall be void for their authority extends to a certaine place and within a certain precinct and not elsewhere and if he which takes Sanctuary goes out any man may take him because he hath lost his priviledge Plowd 72. b. Sir Thomas Popes case 54 If the Conisée of a Recognisance according to the Statute of 23 H. 8. cap. 6 sell several parts of his lands to several feoffées No discharge by the Conusees purchase of part reserving also part thereof to himselfe if execution be sued against his part in an Audita quaerela he shall not compel any of the feoffées to contribute And therefore by the same reason the purchase of part by the Conisée shall not discharge the execution for the execution of the Conisée shall be discharged in consideration that he shall be contributory if he were Feoffée and not Conisée and then in as much as he shall not be contributory if he were Feoffée and not Conisee his purchase of part shall not discharge the execution being Conisée quià cessante causa c. Co. Inst pars 1 70. b. 3. 55 If the King had given lands to an Abbot and his successors to hold by knight-Knight-service this had béen good Lands held by Corporations in Knights Service and the Abbot should have done homage and found a man c. or have paid escuage But there was no wardship or reliefe or other incident belonging thereunto yet if the Abbot with the assent of his covent had conveyed the land to a natural man and his heirs now wardship and reliefe and other incidents belonged of common right to the tenure And so it is if the King give lands to a Major and Communalty and their successors to be holden by knight-Knight-service In this case the Patentées shall do no homage neither shall there be any wardship or reliefe onely they shall find a man c. or pay escuage But if they convey over their lands to any natural man and his heires now homage ward mariage reliefe and other incidents belong thereunto quià cessante ratione legis cessat ipsa lex Lord and Villain 56 If villanage be pleaded by the Lord in an action Real Co. ibid. 127. b. 4. 18 E. 4. 6. 7. personal or mixt and it is found that he is no villaine the bringing of a writ of errour is no enfranchisement because thereby he is to defeat the former judgement and if in the mean time the plaintiffe or demandant bring an action against the Lord he néed make no protestation so long as the record remaines in force for at that time he is frée but the Lord shall be restored to all by the writ of errour Waste 57 If lands be given to two and to the heires of one of them Co. ibid 247. b. 3. he that hath the fée simple shall not have an action of wast upon the Statute of Glocester against the Ioyntenant for life but his heir shall maintaine an action of waste against him upon that Statute So that in this case the heir shall maintaine that action which the Ancestor could not Dower 58 If the husband alien his land Co. Inst pars 1 33. a. 4. and then the wife is attainted of felony now is she disabled but if she be pardoned before the death of the husband she shall be endowed Also if the sonne endow his wife at her age of 7 yeares ex assensu patris if she before the death of her husband attaine to the age of nine yeares the dower is good Office and Rent 59 The King granteth to one an office at will Finch 8. Co. ibid. 42. a. 4 3 E. 4. 8. and ten pounds yearly rent during life pro officio illo here if the King put him out of his office the rent shall cease 21. 4. Guardian in Soccage 60 The executor or husband after the death of the wife guardian in Soccage shall not retain the wardship 7 El. 293. b. Finch 9. Co. Inst pars 1 89. a. 1. for the guardian hath it not to his owne use but for the benefit of the heire and the executor or husband by common intendment beare not such affection to the Infant as the testator or his wife did which was the cause that the law gave them the wardship A Pardon 61 If a stroke be given the first day of May 13 El. 401. Finch 9. and the King pardon him the second day of May all felonies and misdemeanors the party smitten dieth the third day of May so as this is no felony till after the pardon yet is the felony pardoned for the misdemeanors being pardoned all things pursuing it are also pardoned Livery 62 The King hath a Ward pur cause de gard 13 E. 4 10. b. Finch 9. and after maketh Livery to the first Ward the second Ward shall not sue Livery Coparceners 63 If two coparceners make a lease reserving a rent Finch 9. they shall have this rent in common as they have the reversion But if afterwards they grant the reversion excepting the rent they shall be from thenceforth Ioyntenants of the rent Challenge 64 It is no principal Challenge to a juror 14 H. 7. 2. Finch 9. that he hath married the parties mother if she be dead without issue for the cause of favour is removed Entry 65 If an Infant tenant in taile make a feofment in fée and die Co. Inst pars 1 337. a. 2. his issue may enter but if after the feofment made he be attainted of felony and dieth the entry of the issue is taken away for his entry is not lawful in respect of his estate onely but of his bloud also which is corrupted Formedon and therefore in that case he is driven to his Formedon Villain 66 Si mulier serva copulata fit libero c. partus habebit haereditatem Bract. lib. 4. fol. 298. b. Idem l. 1. c. 6. mater nullam dotem quià mortuo viro suo libero redit in pristinum statum servitutis nisi haeres ei dotem fecerit de gratia Co. Inst Pl. 1. 123. a. 2. Co. Inst pars 1 174. a. 4. 67 If one coparcener maketh feoffment in fée Coparceners and after her feoffée is impleaded and voucheth the feoffor she may have aide of her Coparcener to deraign a warranty
Inst pars 1 83. b. 3. All Earldoms and Baronies were derived from the Crown and were holden of the King in Capite and the King would not then suffer them to be divided or severed And such intire Earldoms and Baronies are within that Statute to pay relief according to the limitation thereof Howbeit at this day Earls and Barons are without such Earldoms and Baronies of the Kings gift in chief For at the creation of an Earl he hath sometimes an Annuity granted unto him and sometimes nothing at all but rather giveth somewhat for his Honour So as such Earls and Barons so created are cléerely out of the Statute of Magna Carta and are to pay such reliefs as other men that hold of the King in Capite For as the heir of a Knight shall not pay 100 s. relief unlesse he hath a Knights fée c. so neither the Earl nor Baron shall pay any relief by that Statute unlesse he hath an Earldom or Barony intended by the same Statute c. â—xecutors to â—ll lands 14 By the Statute of 21 H. 8. cap. 4. it is provided Co. ib. 113. a. 3. that where lands are willed to be sold by Executors though part of them refuse yet the residue may sell And here albeit the letter of the Law extendeth onely where Executors have a power to sell yet being a beneficial law it is by construction extended also where lands are devised to Executors to be sold Co. ib. 143. a. 4 Littl. Sect. 216. 15 The Law so regardeth equity and equality Tenure of land that it will in divers cases work according to them without any provision or reservation of the party And therefore if before the Statute of Quia emptores terrarum a man had made a feoffment in fée rendring rent to him and his heirs this was rent-Rent-service for which he might distrain of common right And if he had made no reservation at all of any rent or service Yet the Feoffée should then have holden of the Feoffor by such service as the Feoffor held over of his Lord next paramount For the Law in this case did create a tenure Littl. Sect. 222. Co. ib. 148. b. 3. 16 If a man seised of divers lands of some in Fée-simple Rent-servâ—â— apportionable and of the rest in tail make a gift in tail or a lease for life or years of all reserving a rent and die Here if the issue in tail avoyd the gift or lease as to the entailed lands the rent shall be apportioned for seeing the rent is reserved out of and for the whole land it is reason that when part thereof is evicted by an elder title that the Donée or Lessée should not be charged with the whole rent but that it should be apportioned ratably according to the value of the land Co. ib. 154. a. 1. 17 By the Statute of 7 R. 2. cap. 10. it is enacted Equity upâ—â— 7 R. 2. â—â— that an Assise of rents issuing forth of lands in divers Counties shall be taken in Confinio comitatus which séems to be meant onely of Counties that border one upon another Neverthelesse albeit the Counties do not joyn but have twenty Counties lying between them yet the assise in Confinio comitatus doth lye and the Iustices shall sit between the said Counties And where the Statute seems to speak of two Counties onely the like Law is when the rent issueth out of lands lying in more Counties than two Co. ibid. a. 3. 18 The Statute of Merton cap. 2. made 20 H. 3. Equity upâ—â— Merton 20 H. 3. which gives the writ of Redisseisin is as followeth Item si quis fuerit disseisitus de libero tenemento coram justiciariis Itinerantibus seisinam suam recuperaverit per Assinam novae disseisinae vel per recognitionem eorum qui fecerint disseisinam ipse disseisitus per Vicecomitem seisinam suam habuerit fi iidem disseisitores posteà post iter justiciariorum vel infrà de eodem tenemento iterum eundem conquerentem disseisiverint inde convicti fuerint statim capiantur c. Here albeit this Statute seems to intend onely lands and tenements Littl. Sect. 233. yet Littleton § 233. Rent-sec◠〈◊〉 charge expounds it to extend also to a Rent-charge or a Rent-seck For although they are against common right yet a man may have a Free-hold in them And therefore if a man grant omnia tenementa sua a Rent-charge or a Rent-seck will also passe thereby Also by the same Statute the Assise seems to be limited to be taken onely coram justiciariis Itinerantibus Howbeit Littleton there speaketh generally and so is the Statute to be intended viz. before any other Iustices that have authority to take Assises and Justices Itinerant are onely set down there for an example And albeit that Statute saith Recuperavit per Assisam c. by the verdict of the Assise as Littleton in the same Chapter expoundeth it or per recognitionem c. by confession yet if the recovery be upon a demurrer or by pleading of a record and failer of it or by any other manner such recoveries are also within the equity of the same Statute And therefore Littleton in the abovesaid Section speaketh generally Et recovera le seisin del rent intimating that it ought to be understood of all manner of recoveries in an Assise of Novel disseisin Westm 2. â— by equity though peâ— And in that manner is the abovesaid Statute confirmed by Westm 2. cap. 26. And here it is worthy observation that this Statute is expounded by equity notwithstanding it is a penal Law for by the said Statute of Westminst 2. double damages is given upon the recovery Co. ib. 174. a. 3. Co. l. 4. 121. b. 4 Bastards case 19 There is a diversity between a recovery in value by force of a warranty upon an exchange and upon a partition Exchange Partition Recovery for upon an exchange he that loseth shall recover a full recompence for all that he so loseth But upon a partition the patcener that loseth shall onely recover the moity or half of that which is lost to the end that the losse may be equal 48. Equity of 32 H. 8. 32. 20 The Tenant by the Courtesie shall have a writ of Partition upon the Statute of 32 H. 8. cap. 32. Co. ib. 175. a. 4. as well as Ioyntenant or Tenant in common for life or years For albeit he is neither Ioyntenant nor Tenant in common because a praecipe lyeth against the Parcener or Tenant by the Courtesie yet forasmuch as he is in equal mischief as another Tenant for life he shall be intended within the equity of that Statute Division of lands Hotchpot 21 If a man seised of lands in fee hath issue two daughters Littl. Sect. 267. and gives part of them to one of his daughters in Frankmarriage and dies In this case albeit
Law doth not allow Misnomer 2 In a conveyance of lands in Kent certain lands lying in Beamston were excepted by the name of the Mannor of Beamston Co. l. 6. 6 4. b. Sir Moyle Finches case whereas it had indéed formerly béen a Mannor but was none at that time yet was it adjudged to be well excepted And in the Argument of this point it was said that the Law favours not advantages of misnaming otherwise then as the strict rule of Law requires no not in writs which may be abated and new ones purchased much lesse in grants or other conveyances in which case they cannot have new ones And therefore if two be joyned in a writ the one shall not plead the Misnamer of the other as it is agréed in 14 H. 6. 3. 33 E. 3. Mainten de briefe 63. In an action against baron and feme albeit they are one person in Law yet the one shall not plead the Misnomer of the other so in trespasse in Heldernesse at W. the defendant pleads in respect of Misnomer that it was neither Town Hamlet or place known c. the Plaintiff replyeth it was without shewing in certaine either that it was a Town hamlet or place known And all this in detestation of nice and dilatorie exceptions Nice constructions 3 Cook Chief Iustice of the C. Pl. in the Earle of Rutlands case in 8 Rep. 6 Jac. complaines together with the other Iudges of the same Court Co. l. 8. 56. b. The Earl of Rutlands case that then of late time divers nice and strained constructions of Letters Patents had béen made and many of them upon slight grounds had béen brought in question with purpose to subvert the force and effect of them which practice said they did much tend to the dishonour of the King and wrong of the subject and was cléerly against the true reason and ancient Rule of Law as did manifestly appeare in all their Books because such nice and captious pretence of certainty confounds true and legal certainty Indictment 4 In Mackallies case in the 9 Rep. exception was taken to the indictment which said Co. l. 9. 66. be Mackallies case in Curia dicti Domini Regis in computatorio suo scituato in Parochia sancti Michaelis in Wood-street London and did not shew in what Ward the said Parish was but it was not allowed for as it was holden in 7 H. 6. 36. b. every Ward in London is as an hundred in the Country and every Parish in London as a town in the hundred and it is not necessarie to declare in what hundred a town is neither yet in what Ward a Parish is And therefore such nicety is to be avoided as néedlesse Vide plus ibidem Exception to a Charter c. 5 Exception was taken against the confirmation of the Charter of Queens Colledge in Oxford Co. l. 11. 20. a. 22. a. Doctor Ayrays case ann 8 Jac. because it was sub nomine Aulae Reginae whereas the Charter it selfe was Aulae Scholarium Reginae but not allowed So in 17 E. 3. 48. one was named Burgensis de novo castro super Tinam and the exception was taken that a Burgesse ought to be of a certain Town and not of a Castle but it was not allowed Exception to a Charter c. for the ancient Sages of the Law did alwayes reject such niceties concerning appellations and names when the thing intended might be thereby well enough known and distinguished III Maximes of Reason taken out of LOGICKE 19 Cessante causa cessat effectus The Corporation failing the land revests in the Donor IF Land holden of I. S. be given to an Abbot and his successors or to any other Corporation In this case if the Abbot and all the Covent die so that the bodie Politique is dissolved Co. Inst pars â— 13 b. 2. the Donor shall have againe the land and not the Lord by Escheate because in the case of a bodie Politique the fée simple is vested in their politique capacity created by the policy of man and therefore the Law doth annex a condition in Law to every such gift and grant that if such bodie Politique be dissolved the Donor or Grantor shall re-enter for that the cause of the gift or grant faileth But no such condition is annexed to the estate in fée simple vested in any man in his natural capacity but in case where the Donor or Feoffor reserveth to him a tenure and then the Law doth imply a condition in Law by way of Escheate Wedlock ceasing the Dower ceaseth 2 The wife shall be endowed of the lands c. of her husband â—o ibid. 32. a. 4 if the mariage continue till his death but if the husband and wife be divorced à vinculo matrimonii as in case of precontract consanguinity affinity or the like but not à mensa thoro onely as for adultery the Dower ceaseth For ubi nullum matrimonium ibi nulla dos See Dyer 13. a. The tenure ended the distress ceaseth 3 For the rent due the last day of the terme Co. ibid. 47. b. 3 the lessor cannot distraine because the terme is ended and therefore some use to reserve the last halfe yeares rent at the feast of St. John Baptist before the end of the terme so as if the rent be not then paid he may distraine betwéen that and Michaelmas following The tenure ended the estople ceaseth 4 If a man takes a lease for years of his own land by déed indented the estopel doth not continue after the terme ended Co. ibid. 47. b. 4 m. 31. 32. Eliz. Londons case Co. l. 4. 54. a. 3. for by making of the lease the estopel doth grow and consequently by the end of the lease the estopel determines and that part of the Indenture which belonged to the Lessée doth after the terme ended belong to the Lessor which should not be if the estopel continued Vide 40. 32. Co. ibid. 76. a. 1 5 If after the Lord hath the wardship of the bodie and land The Seigniory extinct the Wardship ceaseth the Lord doth release to the Infant his right in the Seigniory or the Seigniory descendeth to the infant he shall be out of ward both for the body and land for he was in ward in respect he was not able to do those services which he ought to do to his Lord which now are extinct and Cessante causa cessat causatum And Littleton saith that tenure by knight-Knight-service draweth unto it ward mariage c. So as there must of necessity be a tenure continuing Upon release of all debts the Land in execution is also released So likewise if the CoÌ„nusor in a Statute merchant be in execution and his land also and the Conusée release to him all debts this shall discharge the execution For the debt was the cause of the execution and of the continuance of
a man and a woman and their heires before mariage the husband and wife have moities betwéen them Lands given to Batre and feme but if it be after mariage each of them taketh the whole And therefore in this last case if the husband be attainted of Treason or selleth away the land after her husbands death she shall recover the whole as it fell out in the case of William Ocle who was attainted for murthering E. 2. Finch 41. Co. ibid. 209. b. 2. 18 E. 4 18. 19 H. 6. 54. 20 E. 3. account Pl. 70. 8 In a Mortgage the agréement precedent ought to guide the payment subsequent and therefore in case the feoffée die The conditio◠of a mortgage must be performed and it is agréed betwéen the feoffor and the executors of the feoffée that at the day and place the whole sum shall be paid and that afterwards some part thereof shall be restored this is no performance of the Condition for hereby the state shall not be devested out of the heire which is a third person without a true and effectual payment and not by a shadow and colour of payment Co. l. 5. 96. Goodales case Co. ibid. 248. b. 1. Littl. § 410. Pl. Co. Dame Hales case 6 E. 3. 41. c. 9 Littleton saith that a descent Descent by entry into Religion which happens upon the disseisors entring into Religion shall not take away the entry of the heire yet his entry into Religion is not the cause of the descent but his profession for albeit he enter into Religion yet before he be profest no descent can happen But in this case the Law doth respect the original act and that is his entry into Religion which was his own act and whereupon the profession followed by which profession the descent hapned for Cujusque rei potissima pars principium est And againe Origo rei inspici debet and therefore Littleton attributeth the cause of the discent rather to the deisseisors entring into Religion which was the first act to procure a descent than to his profession which followed thereupon Co. ibid. 372. b. 3. T. 23 El. in the Court of Wards 10 To prevent the barring of an estate taile An entail and the reversion in the King when the reversion is in the King according to the Stat. of 34 H. 8. 20. it is necessary that the estate tail should be created by a King and not by any Subject albeit the King be his heire to the reversion And therefore if the Duke of Lancaster had made a gift in taile and the reversion descended to the King yet was not that estate restreined by that Statute and so of the like Co. l. 5. 15 16. in Wisemans case Vide 21. 8. 33 Ass Pl. 7. 11 If a servant departed out of his Masters service kill his Master upon a malice that he bare him whilest he was his servant Malice prepence it is petty Treason Finch 10. 10 El. Dyer 266. b. 12 A erects a Shop upon the Kings Fréehold No possession against the King the King grants the land to B. in fée A. before entry or seisure of the Shop by the Kings Patentée continueth the possession and dieth seised This is no descent to toll the Patentées entry For by his first erecting of the Shop he could gaine nothing against the King Finch 11. Co. lib. 2. 93. a. 3. Binghams case 6. E. 3. 410. 13 It was said in Binghams case in the 2 Report The original act considerable that when divers accidents are requisite to the consummation of a thing the Law in many cases respects rather the beginning and original cause then any thing else As in 6 E. 3. 41. if a man present to another mans Church in the time of warre and thereupon the presentée is admitted instituted and inducted in time of peace Here the Law gives such regard to the original act viz. the presentation that all which followes thereupon although it be done in time of peace Co. l. 1. 106. Shelleyes case shall be avoided And upon the same reason was Shelleys case adjudged in the 1 Report fol. 106. Grant by baron without feme not good 14 If land be given to Baron and Feme Co. l. 3. 5. b. 3. Owen and Morgans case Co. l. 3. 34. b. 4. Butler and Bakers case and to the heires of their two bodies engendred and the Baron alone suffers a common recovery this shall not bind the estate taile And albeit in this case the Baron which suffers the recovery survives the Feme that is not material for the Law shall adjudge upon the case as it was at the time of the recovery Tenure according to limitation 15 If Land be given to a man and his heires to hold by Soccage during his life and after his decease to hold by knight-Knight-service Littl. § 698 699 700. Here shall be no ward because the tenure by knight-Knight-service begins in the sonne and the Father during his life holds by Soccage And è converso if lands be given to a man and his heires to hold by knight-Knight-service during life and after his decease in Soccage Here likewise shall be no ward because immediately upon the death of the tenant the knight-Knight-service determines and then also the tenure in Soccage begins in the sonne Warranty that begins by disseisor not good 16 If the sonne purchaseth land Co. l. 4 37. a. Tirringhams Case and letteth the same to his father for terme of yeares the father enfeoffes another in fée and binds himselfe and his heires to warranty the Father dies by which the warranty descends to the sonne this warranty shall not barre the sonne from his entry or recovery by assise c. because this warranty begins by disseisin In like manner is it if the father or any other Ancestor be tenant at will by Elegit by Stature Merchant or Statute Staple and make feofment with warranty as aforesaid c. Such warranty shall not barre because it begins by disseisin c. There is the same reason of Guardian in Knight-serice or in Soccage which make such feofment with warranty So also if the father and sonne be Ioyn-tenants in fée and the father make feofment with warranty c. and dies this shall not barre the sonne of his moity causa quae suprà Common appendant due of common right 17 The beginning of common appendant by the ancient Law was in this manner 37 H. 9 34. per totam curiam 29 H. 8. 4. when the Lord of a Mannor did enfeoffe a man of arable land to hold of him in Soccage viz. per servitiam Socae as every such tenure at the beginning as Littleton saith was the feoffée ad manutenendum servitium Socae was to have Common in the Lords wastes for such necessary beasts as were to plow and compasse his land and therefore such Common appendant is
the land be ancient Demesn again for the estate whereupon the confirmation should enure is defeated Finch 14. Absque impetione vasti determined 67 The priviledg of Absque Impetitione vasti is annexed to the privity of the Estate 3 E. 3. 44. per Shard and Stove so that if the estate Co. l. 11. 83. b. 3 Bowles case unto which that priviledg is annexed be changed the advantage of that priviledge is lost 5 H. 5. 9. a. And therefore if a man make a lease for years without impeachment of wast and after confirms the land to him for life he shall be ever after chargeable with waste 28 H. 8. Dyer 10. b. If a lease be made to one pur auter vie without impeachment of wast the remainder to him for the term of his own life Now is he punishable of wast for the first estate unto which the advantage of Absque impetitione vasti was annexed is drowned and gone and therefore that priviledge is gone also So it is likewise of a Confirmation c. Priviledge of 〈◊〉 by the courâ—â—sie lost by aâ—â—nation 68 It was adjudged in the case of one Ewens M. 28. Co. ibid. 29 Eliz. that where the Tenant in taile after possibility of issue extinct granted over his estate the Grantée was forced in a Quid juris clamat to attorn because by the assignment that priviledge was lost And this judgement was affirmed in the Kins Bench in a Writ of Error and with it also agrees 27 H. 6. tit Aide in Statham No prohibition of wast by the alienee of the heire against tenant in dower 69 The heire at the Common Law shall have a prohibition of wast against Tenant in Dower but if the heire grant over the reversion Co. ibid. his Grantée shall not have it for it appears in the Register fol. 72. that such an Assignee in an action of Wast against Tenant in Dower shall recite the Statute of Glocester and then by consequent he shall not have prohibition of Wast at the Common Law for then he should not recite the Statute Vide F. N. B. 55. 14 H. 4. 3. 5 H. 7. 17. b. Co. Inst pars 1 12. b. 4. 70 If a man be seized of lands as heire of the part of his mother Priviledg 〈◊〉 by a purchaâ—â— of the land and maketh a feoffment in fee and taketh back an estate to him and his heirs this is a new purchase and if he die without issue the heirs of the part of the father shall first inherit because the estate unto which the property of descending to the heirs of the part of the mother being by the change of the same estate destroyed that property it selfe is also destroyed So likewise if a man so seized makâ—th a feoffment in fee reserving a rent to him and to his heirs this rent shall goe to the heirs of the part of the father c. Co. ibid. 83. a. 2. Co. l. 4. 88. in Luthrels case 71 If there be Lord and Tenant by Castle-guard Castle-guard gone by aâ—â— nation and the Lord granteth over his Seignory to another In this case the Castle-guard is gone because the Grantee hath not the Castle which is the ground of the service For the same reason it is that if one holdeth of me as of my Mannor of D. by fealty and suit of Court if I grant over the services of this Tenant the suit is gone because the Grantée hath not the Mannor But if the Castle be wholly ruinated Si castrum sit penitùs dirutum yet the tenure remaineth by Knight service and it goeth in benefit of the Tenant as to the guarding of the Castle untill it be re-eedified but ward and marriage belongeth unto the Lord in the meane time Co. Inst pars 1. 53. b. 4. 72 After Waste done Wast made dispunishable there is a special regard to be had to the continuance of the reversion in the same state that it was in at the time of the Waste done for if after the Wast committed the reversion granteth it over though he taketh back the whole estate again yet is the Wast dispunishable So likewise if he grant the reversion to the use of himselfe and his wife and to his heirs yet the Wast is dispunishable and so of the like because the estate of the reversion continueth not but is altered and consequently the Action of Wast for Wast done before which consists in privity is gone also Co. l. 5 28. a. 3. in Middletons case 73 An Executor before probat may release an action Executor may release befoâ—â— probat not the Administrator albeit before probat he cannot bring an action for the right of action is in him So also if two Executors prove the Will and the third refuse yet he may release It is otherwise of an Administrator for if A. release and after take administration that shall not barre him because the right of action was not in him at the time of the release made Co. Inst pars 1 76. b. 3. 74 If there be Lord and Tenant A conditional wardship devested and the Tenant maketh a feoffment in fée of Lands holden by Knight service to the use of the Feoffée and his heirs untill the Feoffor pay unto the Feoffée or his heirs 100 l. at a time and place limited the Feoffée dyeth his heire within age Here the Lord shall have the wardship of body and lands conditionally For if the Feoffor pay the money and enter into the land the wardship of both body and lands is divested Vide pro ibid. Dyer 155. Pl. 20 4 5. P. M. 75 A. by Indenture enrolled in Chancery in consideration of money Use upon an use bargains and sels to B. the Mannor of D. to have and to hold to B. and his heirs to the use of A. for life the remainder to the use of B. in taile Here because the first grant to B. is an use by the Statute of 27 H. 8. and one use cannot be engendred out of another the limitation of the two last uses was adjudged void Dyer 186. 1. 2 3 Eliz. 76 A man gives land to two habendum eis pro termino vitae eorum Cestuy que 〈◊〉 eorum alterius diutiùs viventis ad usum A. B. pro termino vitae suae without more and the two Lessées die In this case it seemed to the Court of Common Pleas that the estate was determined because the estate upon which the use was created and raised was gone c. But Quaere if such an estate had béen made before the Statute of 27 H. 8. of uses Dyer 205. 7. 3 4 Eliz. 77 A writ of extent was awarded in the time of Quéen Mary Extent returnable Quindena Martini and the Writ is executed in the life of the Qu but before the return she dies and yet it was returned and a liberate was thereupon
of his own right heirs the reversion of the fée had béen in him because the use of the fée continued ever in him And the Statute doth execute the possession to the use in the same plight quality and degrée as the use was limited Co. Inst pars 1 22. b. 4. 7 If a man make a gift in taile or a lease for life Void remainder the remainder to his own right heires this remainder is void and he hath the reversion in him for the Ancestor during his life beareth in his body in judgement of Law all his heirs and therefore it is truly said that haeres est pars antecessoris And this appeareth in a common case for if Land be given to a man and his heirs all his heirs are so totally in him that he may give the land to whom he will Co. ib. 23. a. 4. 8 Albeit Tenant in Frankmarriage is estéemed in Law a frée tenure till the fourth degrée be past Frankmarriage Fealty yet the Donées in Frankmarriage shall immediately make fealty because fealty is incident to every tenure except Frankalmoigne and cannot be separated from it Co. ib. 47. a. 3. 9 If a man make a lease for years Rent incident to the reversion and reserve a rent to him and his Executors the rent shall end by his death because the heire hath the reversion and the rent is incident to the reversion Co. ib. 68. a. 1. 10 Fealty is incident to Homage because it is a part of Homage Fealty all the words of Fealty being comprehended within Homage Mirror cap. 3. Co. ib. 69. a. 1. 11 As fealty is incident to Homage Fealty Homage c. so Homage and Knight service are incident to Escuage and by the grant of services Escuage passeth with the rest â—dship of Donee inâ—nt to the â—or 12 If Tenant by Knight service maketh a gift in taile Co. ibid. 77. a. 1. in Sir Thomas Wiats case T. 18 Eliz. in C. Ba. per Cur. and the Donée maketh a Feoffment in fée and the Donée dieth his heire within age the Donor shall have the Wardship of him because he is his Tenant in right But if the Feoffée die his heire within age the Donor shall not have the Wardship of his heire but the Lord paramount because he is Tenant in fait to him Neither shall the Donor avow upon the Feoffée or his heire for the services due unto him because he must in his Avowry shew the reversion in fée to be out of him by the Feoffment and consequently the services incident to the reversion are also out of him but he shall avow upon the Donée and his issue And thus are all books that séem to be at variance either answered or reconciled â—ure 13 There can be no tenure without some service Co. ibid. 92. b. 1. because the service maketh the tenure and is incident unto it 〈◊〉 services 〈◊〉 Fealty seâ—able 14 Of Incidents there be two sorts viz. separable and inseparable Co. ib. 93. a. 1. Separable as rents incident to reversions c. which may be severed Inseparable as fealty to a reversion or tenure which cannot be severed For as all lands and tenements within England are holden of some Lord or other and either mediately or immediately of the King so to every tenure at the least fealty is an unseparable incident so long as the tenure remains and all other services except fealty are severable â—ident teâ—res c. 15 The tenure in Frankalmoigne is an incident to the inheritable bloud of the Grantor Co. ibid. 99. a. 4. and cannot be transferred or forfeited to any other no more than a foundership of an house of Religion which is intended to be in Frankalmoign or Homage Ancestrell or the writ of contra formam Feoffamenti or the writ of contra formam Collationis or any other incident to their inheritable bloud but it is no incident inseparable for the Lord may release to the Tenant in Frankalmoigne and then the tenure is extinct and he shall hold of the Lord paramount by fealty as in the case of Littleton Sect. 139. â—stresse inciâ—nt to fealty 16 If rent-service be behind the Lord may distrain for the arreare Co. ibid. 142. a. 3. because fealty is incident to rent-service and where fealty c. is incident to the rent there is a distresse also incident thereunto 〈◊〉 leases Feâ—y insepaâ—le â—nt not inâ—arably inâ—ent â—alty inciâ—nt 17 In the case of a gift in taile lease for life or years Co. ibid. 143. a. 1. the fealty is an incident inseparable to the reversion so as the Donor or Lessor cannot grant the reversion over and save to himselfe the fealty or such like service but the rent may be excepted because the rent although it be incident to the reversion yet is it not inseparably incident 18 If a man maketh a gift in taile without any reservation Co. Inst pars 1. 143. a. 2. the Donée shall hold of the Donor by the same services that he holds over but otherwise it is of an estate for life or yeares for there if he reserveth nothing he shall have fealty only which is an incident inseparable to the reversion â—elease of â—nd except â—e said rent 19 If there be Lord and Tenant by fealty and rent Co. ib. 150. a. 3. 4. and the Lord by his déed reciting the tenure releaseth all his right in the land saving his said rent In this case the Seignory remains and he shall have the rent as a rent service and also the fealty incident unto it for in saying the said rent it is as much as if he had said the rent service whereunto fealty is incident â—ant of serâ—es quid oâ—atur 20 If the Donée hold of the Donor by fealty and certain rent Co. ibid. 150. b. 1. and the Donor grant the services to another and the Tenant attorne some have said the rent shall not passe because the rent cannot passe but as a rent service being granted by the name of services And the fealty cannot passe because it is an incident inseparable to the reversion But it seemeth that the rent shall passe as a Rent-secke because at the time of the grant it was a rent service in the Grantor and therefore there be words sufficient to passe it to the Grantée and it is not of necessity that it shall be a Rent-service in the hands of the Grantée c. Co. ibid. 148. b. 3. 21 If a man maketh a lease for life of Black acre and White acre Accrueâ— Rent appâ—oned reserving two shillings rent upon condition that if the Lessée doth such an act c. that then he shall have fée in Black acre the Lessée performs the condition Here albeit by relation he hath the fée-simple ab initio yet shall the rent be apportioned for that the reversion of one acre
was enfeoffed to the end he may have the advantage of the warranty c. Co. l. 7. 9. b. 1. Calvins case 63 Ligeance and obedience on the Subjects part to his Prince Ligeance inseparably incident in all places to the subject is an inseparable incident to that power and protection whereby the Prince may command and ought to defend his Subject And this ligeance and obedience which that power and protection thus draweth after them cannot be locall or confined to any certain place or Kingdom but follows the Subject whethersoever he goeth And therefore it is truly said Qui abjurat regnum amittit regnum sed non Regem amittit patriam sed non patrem patriae c. for notwithstanding the abjuration he still oweth the King his ligeance and still remaineth within his protection because the King if he please may pardon and restore him to his Countrey again c. Littl. §. 366. Co. Inst pars 1. 227. b. 4. 64 If a man seised of lands in fee lets them for life without deed A condition incident to as estate for life rendring rent with clause of re-entry upon non-payment of the rent whereupon if the Lessor enter and the Lessée bring an Assize of Novel Disseisin the Iurors may finde the matter at large and the Iustices ought to adjudge it for the Tenant albeit regularly a condition is not valid without deed shewed in Court and that the Lessor shew no deed for they that have conusance of a thing are to have conusance also of all incidents and dependance thereupon and in this case the condition is an incident necessarily depending upon the estate for life which was perfected by livery Vide supra 28. Dyer 2. 1 2. 6 H. 8. 65 Emson avows for Rent-charge granted to him by a stranger Rent land incident to the person who was seised of the land where c. pro consilio impendendo the Plaintiffe pleads in barre that the Defendant was attainted of Treason and committed to the Tower yet the Grantor had néed of Counsel and could not have accesse c. and upon demurrer the Iudgment was that the Avowant should have return because the rent being incident to the person of Emson could not be granted over or forfeited So likewise land given by the King to a Duke to support his dignity cannot be granted over See Max. 45. Dyer 45. 35. 36. 30 H. 8. 66 The King can by no way grant or sever the tenure and seigniory in Chiefe from the Crown Tenure in Capite for no Subject can take it of his grant with such a prerogative And therefore if the King make a release to his Tenant in Capite to hold by a penny and not in Capite this is a void release for that tenure is méerly incident to the person and Crown of the King and hath such a prerogative that it cannot be held of any Subject as the Tenant in Frankalmoigne cannot hold of any other than of the Donor and of his person because it is a speciall tenure Also if the King at this day make a gift in taile to hold of him in Capite and after he grant the reversion of that land to another in fée neither the tenure nor service passe to the Grantée but remain in the King because they are not incident to the reversion but to the person of the King Dyer 175. 25. 132 Eliz. 67 The office of Exigenter of London being void Exigenter of London and Coke Chief Iustice of the C. B. being then also dead Quéen Mary during the vacation of the said places conferred by her Letters Patents the Exigenters office upon Colshil and then made Brown Chiefe Iustice of that Court But Brown refuseth Colshil and admits Scrogges thereunto And in this case it was resolved by all the Iudges and others save the Iustices of the Common Bench that the said office did not appertain to the Qu. to grant but onely in the dispose of the Chiefe Iustice for the time being as an inseparable incident to his person and place and that by reason of common usage and prescription â—ase of Deâ—esnes 68 A Prior makes a lease of the Demesnes of a Mannor rendring rent Dyer 233. 10. 7 Eliz. the King after the dissolution makes a lease for years of the Mannor And it was adjudged that by the name of the Mannor the rent and reversion of the Demesnes passed â—hattel vestâ—â— 69 A wardship fell to the Bishop of Durham by a tenure of him in Capite who dies before seisure yet his Executors shall have it Dyer 277. 57. 10 Eliz. and not the King or Successor for it was incident to his person and a chattel vested in him before his death 42 Quod tacitè intelligitur deesse non videtur V. 64. 11. â—opiholds 1 When custome hath once created Copiholds of Inheritance Co. l. 4. 22. a. 3. in Brownes case and that the land shall be descendable then the Law doth also direct the descent according to the Maximes and rules of the Common Law as incidents to every estate descendable So 5 E. 4. 7. when uses have gained the eeputation of Inheritances descendable the Common Law shall direct the descent of them and that there shall be Possessio fratris of an use as well as of other Inheritances at the Common Law â—ontract imâ—orts an Asâ—umpsit 2 Every contract executory imports in it selfe an Assumpsit Co. l. 4. 94. a. 4. Slades case For when one agrées to pay money or to deliver any thing he doth thereby assume and promise to pay or deliver it and therefore when one sells any goods to another and agrées to deliver them at a day to come and the other in consideration thereof agrées to pay so much money at such a day In this case both the parties may have an action of Debt or an action upon the case upon Assumpsit For the mutual executory agreement of both the parties imports in it selfe as well a reciprocal action upon the case as an action of debt And with this agrées the Iudgment in Reade and Northwoods case Pl. Co. fol. 128. â—xchange imâ—orts warranâ—â— and a conâ—ition 3 In every exchange rightly made Co. l. 4. 121 a. 4. Bastards case this word Excambium imports in it selfe tacitè a condition and also a warranty the one to give re-entry the other Voucher and recompence and all in respect of the reciprocal consideration the one land being given in exchange for the other but that is onely a special warranty for upon Voucher by force thereof he shall not recover any other land in value but that only which was so given in exchange c. And as it is in case of warranty so is it also in case of the condition which the Law implies upon the exchange for if the exchange be betwixt A. and B. and A. aliens his exchanged land to
plea there and a judiciall writ shall issue out of that Court in nature of the protestation made in the first writ and if the protestation were in the nature of an assise of Mortdancester the Iustices shall direct a writ to the Sheriff to summon the Iurors to come out of the ancient Demesne to the Common Pl. and the whole matter shall be tryed and determined in that Court And albeit judgement be given of that land in the Common Pleas yet shall the land still remain ancient Demesne as it was before â—resentation â—y lapse 35 If a man present to an Advowson and after the Incumbent dies F.N.B. 31. â— and the Ordinary presents by lapse another Incumbent and after that Incumbent also dies now may the right Patron present again and if he be disturbed he shall have an assise De Darrein presentment notwithstanding those meane presentments Disturbance 〈◊〉 present 36 If a disturber presents to an Advowson F. N B. 32. â— and the Patron brings an assise of Darrein presentment and hanging the Writ the Incumbent dies if the disturber present again another Incumbent and dies yet the Patron shall have an assise of Darrein presentment upon the first disturbance by Journeys accompts against the heire of the disturber And so if the disturber present two or thrée times within the six moneths the true Patron shall have an assise de Darrein presentment upon the first disturbance Presentation â—y Coparceâ—ers 37 If two Coparceners make partition to present by turne F.N.B. 34. i. albeit the one Coparcener usurp upon the other and presents in her turne this presentment shall not put her out of possession but she shall have her turne when it falls again and shall have a Quare Impedit or Scire facias upon the Composition if it be upon record if she be disturbed to present Presentation â—y an Abbot 38 If in the time of the vacation of an Abbey or Priory F.N.B. 34. m. a Church happens to be void which is of the patronage of the Abbey or Priory and a stranger usurps and presents unto it this usurpation shall not prejudice the Successor but that at the next avoydance of the said Church he may present and have a Quare Impedit It is otherwise when the usurpation is made in the time of his Predecessour for that puts the succession out of possession if the six moneths be past â—ction of Deâ—eipt 39 If a man loose land by default in a Praecipe quod reddat and die F.N.B. 98. q. his heire shall have an action of Deceit as well as the father and shall have restitution The like 40 If a man have execution by default upon a recognizance in a Scire facias sued against one and the Defendant dies F.N.B. 98. r. his Executors shall have a Writ of Deceit and shall be restored 〈◊〉 warrantia â—artae 41 If a man hath a Warrantia cartae hanging F.N.B. 135. l. albeit the Plaintiff that hath the Action against him who brings the Writ De warrantia cartae be non-suited in his action that shall not abate the Writ De warrantia cartae For he may have that Writ although he had no action sued against him for the land c. â—ecogniâ—ance â—udita quaeâ—a 42 Rosse was bound in a Recognizance of 1000 Marks to Pope Pl. Co. 72. Rosse Popes case and Curson according to the Statute of the 23 H. 8. cap. 6. and after Rosse and his wife by fine give to the Conisées the fifth part of the Mannor of Burton Constable and other lands in the County of Yorke in fée And after Pope as Survivor sues execution of the said Recognizance in London against Rosse and his body was taken and the said Rosse supposing the said fine of those lands in the County of Yorke would have discharged him of the recognizance brought his Aâ—dita quaeâ—ela containing the whole matter upon which Writ and Declaration Pope demurred in Law And in this case it was adjudged that the Audita quaerela would not lie nor that the purchase by the Conusées of parcell of the land that Rosse had at the time of the recognizance acknowledged could discharge the recognizance because the person was properly charged with it and not the land but in respect of the person c. Finch 15. 43 The custome of Gavelkind is not changed Gavelkind Ancient Demesne though a fine and recovery be had of the same at the Common Law for this is a custome by reason of the land 6 E. 6. Dyer 72. Finch 16. and therefore runneth always with the land But otherwise it is of land in ancient Demesne partable amongst the Males for there the custome runneth not with the land simply but by reason of the ancient Demesne And therefore because the nature of the land is changed by the fine and recovery from ancient Demesne to land at the Common Law the custome of parting it amongst the Males is also gone F.N.B. 21. b. Finch ibid. 44 If an erroneous recovery he had of lands in Burrough English the youngest son shall have a Writ of Errour Burrough â—â—glish because the land it self goeth to him so shall all the sons of lands in Gavelkind 42 E. 3. 3. Finch ibid. 45 Two Coparceners make partition Parceners and one covenants with the other to acquit the land Now if the Covenantée aliens his part the Alienée shall have a writ of covenant Co. Inst pars 1 171. a. 2. 46 If the annual value of the land be equal at the time of the partition and after become unequal by any matter subsequent Partition as by surrendring ill husbandry or the like yet the partition remains good Judicis officium est ut res ita tempora rerum Quaerere quaesito tempore tutus eris Co. inst pars 1. 23. a. 11. 47 Whosoever is seised of land Feoffmentâ— his own 〈◊〉 the old 〈◊〉 maines hath not onely the estate of land in him but the right to take the profits which is in nature of the use and therefore when he makes a feoffment in fée without valuable consideration to divers particular uses so much of the use as he disposeth not is in him as his ancient use in point of Reverter As if a man be seised of two acres the one holden by Knight service in priority and the other by the same service in posteriority and maketh a feoffment in fée of both acres to the use of himselfe and his heirs the old use continued in him and the priority and posteriority remain So it is of lands of the part of the Mother for if one make a feoffment in fée of them to the use of himselfe and his heirs the use shall still goe to the heire of the part of the Mother which could not be if it were not the old use but a thing newly created The like law
Retraxit cannot be acknowledged by an Attorney Co. lib. 9. 75. b. 4. Combes case 10 There is a diversity betwixt a general and absolute power and authority as owner of the land Surrender by Attorney and a particular power and authority by him which hath but a particular interest as a Copiholder being owner of the land according to the custome may surrender his Copihold land by Attorney but if A. be Tenant for life the remainder in taile c. And A. hath power to make leases for 21 yeares rendring the ancient rent c. he cannot make a lease by letter of Attorney by force of his power because he hath but a particular power which is annexed to his person And so it was resolved in the Lady Greshams case at the Assises in Suffolk 24 Eliz. by Wray and Anderson Chiefe Iustices and Iustices of Assise there Co. lib. 9. 76. a. 1. Combes case 11 Some things are so inseparably annexed to the person of a man Villein that he cannot do them by another as the making of Homage and Fealty So it is holden in the 33 E. 3. tit Trespass 253. that the Lord may beate his Villein for cause or without cause and the Villein shall have no remedy but if the Lord command another to beate his Villein the Villein shall have an action of Battery against him that so beats him Co. Ibid. 12 If the Lord distrain the Cattle of his Tenant Wrongful â—â—â—stresse when nothing is behind the Tenant for the respect and reverence which belongs to the Lord shall not have an Action of Trespass vi armis against the Lord but if the Lord in that case command his Bailiff or Servant to distrain him when nothing is arrear the Tenant shall have an Action of Trespasse vi armis against the Bailiffe or Servant c. 2 H. 4. 4. 11 H. 4. 78. 1 H. 6. 6. 9 H. 7. 14. Fitz. N.B. 25. c. 13 It séems that before the Statutes No Attorney allowed by the common Law which grant that a man may make an Attorney c. the Iustices would not suffer either Plaintiffe or Defendant Demandant or Tenant to make attorney in any suit or in any Court c. because the words of the Writ command the Defendant to appear which ought alwayes to be understood in proper person and at this day also a mans reall suit at a Leet or Sheriffs turne cannot be done by Attorny but ought always to be in proper person c. Howbeit before those Statutes the King by his Prerogative might have granted to a man to make an Attorney in every action or suit as well to the Tenant or Defendant as to the Demandant or Plaintiff and might have directed his writs or letters to the Iustices for that purpose c. F.N.B. 25. d. 14 If the Tenant for terme of life be impleaded in a praecipe quod reddat No receipt by attorney he in reversion may pray to be received to defend his right in default of the Tenant or upon his faint pleading but in this case he cannot pray by his Attorney to be received without a Writ out of the Chancery directed to the Iustices for that purpose upon some cause alleadged in the said Writ c. 22 E. 4. 34. Finch 16. 15 A man cannot excuse himselfe of a contempt as of not serving the Kings processe Answer of a contempt peâ—sonal of rescuing a Prisoner from the Sheriffe or other Officer or the like by Attorney but he ought to appeare thereupon in proper person c. Co. l. 9. 96. b. 4. Sir George Reynels case 16 The office of Marshal of the Marshalsie cannot be granted for years because it is an office of great trust annexed to the person The office oâ— the Marshâ—â— personal concerns the administration of Iustice and the life of the Law which is to kéep such as are in execution in salva arcta custodia to the end they may the sooner pay their debts And this trust is individual and personal and therefore cannot be transferred to Executors or Administrators For the Law will not confide in persons unknown for the ordering of Matters which concern the administration of Iustice c. 45. 6. â—ersonal serâ—â—ce not apâ—ortioned or â—ultiplyed 17 If a man hold land by the personal service of being Sewer Co. l. 8. 105. b. 4. in John Talbots case Carver Butler c. to his Lord or when the Tenant is bound by his tenure Ad convivandum Dominum suum familiam suam semel in anno or ad aequitandum cum Domino suo in Com. N. sumptibus suis propriis vide 10 E. 3. 23. in John de Bromptons case by alienation of parcel of the land the service shall not be apportioned or multiplyed because such services are personal and are to be personally performed by one man only Howbeit purchase of parcel by the Lord shall extinguish them â—ilizers office â—ersonal 18 The office of Filizer cannot be extended upon a Statute Dyer 7. b. 28 H. 8. 10. or Elegit albeit it is a Franktenement for which an Assise lyeth because it is an office of trust and personal â—everal torts â—everal actions 19 An action upon the Case was brought by two Dyer 19. 112. 28 H. 8. for that the Defendant called them two false Knaves and Thieves Here the action was not well brought joyntly for that the wrong done to the one was not the wrong done to the other and therefore they ought to have severed in actions as in case of false imprisonment A thing in action cannot â—e transferred 20 The reason why a thing in action cannot be transfered or granted over to another is because it is so annexed to the person Dyer 26. a 16â— 28 H. 8. 282. 28. 11 Eliz. 300. 36. 13 Eliz. that it cannot be severed from him nor by any meanes prosecuted but in his name as an Obligation Statute Recognizance or the like So if a man hath an Advowson and when it is void the Patron grants proximam nominationem Presentationem Institutionem cùm primò proximè vacuerint In this case the Grantée shall not have that Presentation because it is a thing in action which the Patron could not transfer but the next to it he shall have which was the first that could be granted 45 They cannot be granted or transferred over as matters of pleasure ease trust and authority To hunt way â—o dyet c. 1 A licence to hunt in my Parke to go to Church over my ground 12 H. 7. 25. 7 H. 4. 36. to come into my house to eat and drinke with me cannot be granted over So of a way granted for life over my ground Finch 17. Personal offices of trust 2 The Patentée for life of an office of trust 11 E. 4. 1. as to be a Chamberlain of the
be revoked So if I make my testament irrevocable yet may I revoke it for my act or my words cannot alter the judgement of the Law and make that irrevocable which of his own nature is revocable c. And therefore if I be bound by obligation to stand to the award of I. S. albeit if I discharge that arbitrement I shall forfeit my bond Yet is my submission in that case revocable and so is the book in 5 E. 4. 3. b. which séems to be contrary in that point well reconciled c. Restraint to demise void 18 The Charter of the Incorporation of Suttons Hospital restrains them to alien or demise but in a certain forme Co. l. 9. 30. b. 4. in the case of Suttons Hospital this is onely a precept and ordinance testifying the Kings desire but binds not in Law So likewise in another part of the same Charter the exemption of the Ordinaries jurisdiction is but a clause declaratory For being a Lay-corporation it neither can or ought to be visited c. A defective â—â—â—re 19 In the case of Monopolies in the 11 Report Co. l. 11. 85. b. 3. in the case of Monopolies the Defendant being charged by the Plaintiffe to have sold Cards c. contrary to the priviledge granted to the said Plaintiff by Letters Patents of Qu. Eliz. c. puts in this barre that the City of London is an ancient City and that within it time out of mind c. there hath béen a society of Haberdashers and that within the said City there was a custom Quod quaelibet persona de societate illa usus fuit consuevit emere vendere liberè mâ—rchandizare omnem rem omnes res Marchandizabiles infra hoc regnum Angliae de quocunque vel quibuscunque personis c. and pleaded farther that he was Civis liber homo de civitate societate illa and that he sold playing Cards c. as was lawful for him to do c. But the Justices gave no regard to this Barre because it was no more than what the Common Law would have said and then no such particular custome ought to have béen alleaged For in his quae de jure communi omnibus conceduntur Consuetudo alicujus patriae vel loci non est alleganda and with this accords 8 E. 4 5. c. Dyer 19. b. 115. 28 H. 8. 20 The Lessor covenants Lessee may take boots without assignment that the Lessée shall have sufficient Hedg-boot by the assignment of his Bailiff In this case for as much as this covenant is in the affirmative and floweth from the Lessor and is no more than what the Law gives a Lessée priviledge to do per Baldwin and Fitzherbert the Lessée may take Hedg-boot without assignment Tamen quaere for Shelley is of another opinion because Cujus est dare ejus est disponere Modus conventio vincunt legem and the Lessée also séems to be bound by the acceptance of the lease upon those termes Ideo quaere Howbeit if I let to one two acres of Meadow and that it shall be lawful for the Lessée to cut the grasse by the assignment of the Lessor yet the Lessée may cut the grasse without my assignment Dyer 179. 45. 2 Eliz. 21 A man seised in fée of lands in Burrough English since the Statute of 27 H. 8. makes a feoffment in fée to the use of himself Burrough English and the heirs males of his body engendred Secundum cursum communis legis and after dies seised accordingly having issue two sons In this case the youngest sonne shall have the land notwithstanding the words before Vide 26 H. 8. 5. Dyer 230. 57. 6 Eliz. 22 The Lord by knight-Knight-service releaseth and confirms to the Tonant to hold by a Spurre In this case Tenure the new reservation is void upon the estate before created Howbeit the tenure by fealty still remains Dyer 238. 36. 7 Eliz. 23 A Coroners Inquest indicts a man of murther quòd fugam fecit Coroners Inquest and upon his arraignment he is acquit and another found guilty ut oportet and it was also found that he did not flie yet he shall forfeit his goods for upon his arraignment in this case the flight shall not be given in charge because they were before forfeited by the Coroners Inquest Hob. 5. Crow and Edwards 24 In debt upon an obligation of 60 l. for the payment of 31 l. 10 s. at Coventry issue was taken that the money was paid at Coventry Trial in forreign County and yet by consent of parties and a paper Rule of Court the issue was tried at London and found for the Plaintiff and judgement given Howbeit upon a Writ of Errour brought in the Exchequer Chamber the judgement was reversed for consent of Parties cannot change the Law Hob. 13. Sir Daniel Norton and Simmes 25 If a Sheriff will make an Vnder-sheriff Sheriffe provided that he shall not serve Executions above 20 l. without his special warrant this proviso is void as being against Law and Iustice For albeit he may choose not to make an Vnder-sheriff at all or may make him at his will and so remove him wholly yet he cannot leave him an Vnder-sheriff and yet abridg his power no more than the King may in case of the high Sheriff himself Vide 167. 52. Hob. 120. Smales and Dale 26 Albeit a Tenant in Common enter into the whole Tenants in Common and claim all expresly yet he cannot thereby dispossesse his companion for the possession of him that so enters is over all lawful as well before such claime as after so as there is no possession altered by such claim and then a sole claim without more can never change the possession and without a change of possession which the Law protects it remains as before and therefore a Coparcener Ioyntenant or Tenant in common can never be disseised by his fellow but by an actual Ouster For the same reason it is that is a Tenant in Common do alone bring an action of trespasse against a stranger his action shall be abated by pleading him Tenant in Common with another albeit his entry were made generally and expresly into all which proves that the entry of one serves for all for else they could not joyn in an action of trespasse 66 Expressio eorum quae tacitè insunt nihil operatur â—pon the Qu. â—ant of the â—version deâ—and must be â—pon the â—â—nd 1 Queen Eliz. le ts for years rendring rent Co. l. 4. 73. Boroughs case payable at the receipt of the Exchequer at Westm Seu ad manus balivorum vel recâ—pturum c. with condition to be void for non-payment c. the Quéen grants the reversion in fée Here the demand of this rent ought now to be made upon the land For in the Quéens case the limiting of
the land In this case the Rent and Escuage shall be apportioned but the Homage and Fealty shall still remain intire for the residue of the land still remaining in the Tenants hand because he still holds the residue of the land of him and then he must hold it by some service or other and therefore those services being in their nature unseverable and intire they shall totally remain being indéed the fréest and least chargeable services that the Tenant can hold by c. Co. ib. 150. a. 1. 14 Albeit in some cases a Rent-charge The charge of a stature not apportionable which is in his nature intire may by act in Law be apportioned as when the Grantée of the rent comes to the land by descent or the like Yet in such cases the writ of Annuity faileth because that writ being grounded upon the grant by déed which is intire must be sued for the whole and cannot be sued for part Also a rent in respect of the realty may be apportioned but the personalty is indivisible and shall not be severed no not by act in Law As if execution be sued of body and lands upon a Statute Merchant or Staple and afterwards the inheritance of part of those lands descends to the Conusée In this case all the execution is avoided for the duty being intire and personal cannot be divided c. Annua nec debitum judex non separat ipsum Co. ib. 15â— b. 2. 15 A Rent-service is of its own nature apportionable Rent-service becomes rent-seck Howbeit if it be changed from Rent-service to a Rent-seck by severance thereof from the Seigniory it thereupon becomes intire and unsevâ—â—able according to the nature of a Rent-secke And therefore if there be Lord and Tenant by fealty and certain rent and the Lord by déed grant the rent in fée fée-taile or for life saving the fealty the rent which before was Rent-service is by that severance of it from the Seigniory made a Rent-seck and then if the Grantée purchase part of the land out of which that rent is issuing the whole rent is extinct 16 If a man be seised of two acres of land in two several Counties Co. ib. 153. b. 4. and maketh a lease of both of them reserving two shillings rent In this case albeit several liveries be made at several times yet is it but one intire rent in respect of the necessity of the case and he shall distrain in one County for the whole rent and make one avowry for the whole c. A County intire for livery 17 Every County is as it were an intire body of it selfe Finch 79. Littl. § 418. so that upon a feoffment of lands in many Towns in one County livery of seisin made in one parcel in any one of those Towns in the name of all sufficeth for all the lands in all the other Towns within the same County but upon a feoffment of lands in divers Counties there must be livery of seisin in every County For entry In like manner Littl. § 417. Co. ib. 252 b. 4. if a man have cause to enter into lands lying in divers Towns in the same County if he enter into one parcel thereof lying in one Town in the name of all the lands in the same County by such entry he hath as good possession of all those lands as if he had entred into every parcel but if they lie in several Counties there must be several entries Co. ib. 153. b. 4. So likewise if a man de disseised of a rent issuing out of lands lying in divers Towns within one and the same County he shall néed to bring but one Assise for the recovery of that rent c. But if the lands lie in several Counties he shall have several Assises in confinio Comitatus and in either County shall make his pliant of the whole rent Howbeit there shall be but one Patent to the Iustice And this Assise in confinio Comitatus is given by the Statute of 7 R. 2. Stat. 7. R. 2. 10. For no Assise lay in that case at the Common Law but the party might distrain for the whole rent in either County The like for â—ervices 18 If a man hold divers Mannors or lands in divers several Counties by one tenure and the Lord is deforced of his services Co. ib. 154. a. 2. he shall have several writs of customes and services viz. For every County one writ returnable at one day in the Court of Common Pleas and thereupon Count according to his case by the Common Law But if the Tenant in that case do cease the Lord shall not have several writs of Cessavit ut suprà For the writ of Cessavit is given by Statute of West 2. cap. 21. and the form and manner of that writ is therein prescribed for which cause it is holden in our books that in that case a Cessavit lay not at the Common Law c. â— Villein adâ—owson c. â—ndivisible 19 Of Inheritances some be intire and some several and of intire Co. ib. 164. b. 3. some be divisible and some indivisible c. If a Villein descend to two Coparceners this is an intire inheritance and albeit the Villein himself cannot be divided yet the profit of him may for one Coparcener may have him one day or wéek and the other another day or wéek c. They may likewise have an Advowson in coparcenary and may present by turns because that is also an intire Inheritance which cannot be divided â—stovers â—â—ots and â—ings uncerâ—in not diviâ—ble 20 If a man have reasonable Estovers as House-boot Co. ibid. b. 4. Hay-boot c. appendant to his Frée-hold they are so intire as they shall not be divided betwéen Coparceners So if a Corodie incertain be granted to a man and his heirs and he hath issue divers daughters this Corodie shall not be divided betwéen them It is otherwise of a Corodie certain for thereof partition may be made Likewise Homage Fealty Piscary uncertain Common sans number and the like cannot be divided betwéen Coparceners and the two last not onely because they are intire but also because it would be a charge to the Tenant of the Soile if such hereditaments should be devisible the interest in them being unlimited c. Co. ib. 190. a. 3. 21 If a Corodie be granted to two men and their heirs In this case Grant of a Corodie to two because the Corodie is incertain and cannot be severed it shall amount to a several grant viz. to each of them one Corodie for the persons be several and the Corodie is personal and the grant shall be taken most strongly against the Grantor Littl. § 314. Co. ibid. 197. 22 If two Tenants in Common of lands in fée make a gift in taile or a lease for life to another rendring to them yearly a certain rent Tenants in common
Also if issue be taken whether the Plaintiffe be an Earl or no it shall not be tried by the Countrey but the Kings writ Also the Defendant shall not have a day of grace against a Lord of the Parliament because he is conceived to attend the publique And all these and many other do appear in our Books 48 E. 3. 30. Regist 179. F. N. B. 247. 48. Ass Pl. c. 23. Ass Pl. 24. 32 H. 6. 27. 35 H. 6. 46. So that as when such an Office descends to an infant or to a man de non sanae memoriae they of necessity ought to exercise it by Deputy so likewise an Earl for the necessity of his attendence which the Law intends upon the King and the Common-wealth that Stewardship of a base Court shall be executed by Deputy Also if a Parkership be granted to an Earl without words to make a Deputy yet he may keep it by his servants And if a Duke have licence to hunt in a Park the Law will allow him attendance suitable to his condition c. Marshalsie Seisure Office Scire facias 56 It was found by Office in 9 Jac. that Sir George Reynel had forfeited the Office of Marshal of the Marshalsie Co. l. 9 95. b. 3. in Sir George Reynels Case by divers voluntary escapes and it was resolved that the King might seise that Office without suing out a Scire facias And in that Case it was observed 1 That the King in some cases shall be in possession by seisure without Office as in 21 H. 7. and Stamf. in case of temporalties of a Bishop and of Priors aliens because the certainty of them appears in the Exchequer 2 He shall sometimes be in possession by Office without seisure as of Lands Tenements Offices c. which are local oâ— whereof continual profit may be taken as upon condition attainder wardship c. Vide 2 H. 7. 8. Stamf. 55. Dowries case in Rep. 3. and the Sadlers Rep. 5. And the Office albeit false yet cannot be avoided without traverse for he cannot traverse the Kings title in the information Traverse Advowson c. 20 E. 4. 10. 3 The King shall be in possession by Office and seisure of an Advowson and thereof he is not in possession until presentment admission and institution And if the King upon refusal bring a Quare Impedit the owner may traverse the Kings title in that Action without traverse of the Office because it is not a manual but an incorporal hereditament also the right to present is casual and not continual 4 The King shall be in possession without office where his tenant died without heir 9 H. 7. 2. 5 When distinct matters amount to an office in that case there ought to be a Scire facias before the King can seise 6 When a common person is put to his Action In that Case the King upon office is put to his Scire facias c. â—o tenure reâ—erved Capite 57 When the King grants any land without reservation of any tenure or absque aliquo inde reddendo or the like Co. l. 9. 123. b. 3. in Anthony Lowes Case the Land by operation of Law shall be holden of the King in capite by knights-knights-service according to the rate and proportion of Land holden by knights-service viz. more or lesse according to the quantity of the Land c. 58 When any thing is due to the King Co. l. 9. 132. a. in Holis Case he ought to have the full and compleat effect of the thing so due unto him As if there be Grandfather Father and Son of Lands whereof some are holden of the King in capite by Knight-service in capite and the residue of other Lords c. And the Grandfather conveys all the Lands holden of other Lords and part of the capite Lands to the Father for life the remainder to the Son in tail the remainder to the right heirs of the Grandfather And the residue of the capite Lands to four younger Sons successively for life the remainer to the right Heirs of the Grandfather the Grandfather dies the Father tenders his livery and dies before livery sued or office found the Son being of full age and all this is found by office and the Son continues the livery the four younger Sons being still in life In this Case albeit by the death of the father before livery sued the King hath lost the priviledge of having primer seisin after the death of the Grandfather as it was adjudged in Northcots case and in Hales case in the 8 Rep. c. for here the Son shall not sue livery nor pay primer seisin because they were due by the Father after the death of the Grandfather and the Son living the Father is not within the Statutes of 32 34 H. 8. for the Lands conveyed unto him Neverthelesse in the same Case the King shall have primer seisin for the Lands conveyed to the younger Sons because they are within the thrée Cases in which wardship and primer seisin are given unto the King by the said Acts viz. Advancement of his wife preferment of his children and payment of his debts And the reason hereof is because when the said Acts give unto the King primer seisin it is intended of an actual and effectual primer seisin and not of one which is onely Mathematical and Imaginary for as before is said the King ought alwayes to have a full and compleat effect of the thing which is due unto him So also if the King hath title to present by lapse hâc vice and he present and his Clerk is admitted and instituted but dies before induction In this Case the King shall present again for he had not the full and compleat effect of his presentation as it was resolved by Sir James Dyer rotam Curiam in Gyles his Case 18 Eliz. in Co. Ba. Likewise if the King marry a daughter Marriage again which he hath inward infra annos nubiles and before the age of consent the Baron dies the King shall have the marriage of the Heir again because the first marriage was not compleat as it was resolved in Ambrosia Gores case in the 6 Rep. fol. 22. King donor not barred And the King donor in tail before the Statute of West 2. de donis c. was not barred by the alienation of the Donée post prolem suscitatam without Assets albeit there were collateral warranty Howbeit in all these Cases a common person shall be barred c. Co. l. 10. 113. b 1. in Legats Case 59 When the King grants any thing upon a false insinuation Grant upon false suggestions void or suggestion such a grant of the Kings is void for in that Case there is a diversity betwéen the King a common person For a Subject that may intend his private affairs shall not in such Case avoid his Grant but the King who intends the Publique good shall avoid
the money before the stealing and the other refused to deliver them then for this default in him he shall be charged for after such tender he kept them upon trust as Bailée and therefore was to look safely to them at his peril â—and devised 〈◊〉 be sold 6 If a man seised of Lands deviseth that his executors shall sell it Co. ib 112. b. 3. 113. a. 2. 181. b. 2 and he maketh two executors and dieth In this case if one of the executors before sale thereof die or refuse at the Common Law before the Statute of 21 H. 8. cap. 4. the land could not have béen sold by the surviving executor because the power given them by the will being but a bare authority it ought strictly to be observed Dier 177 32. 2 El. and they ought both to joyn in the sale but if a man deviseth lands to his executors to be sold and he maketh two executors and the one dieth yet the survivor may sell the land because they had not a bare trust onely but also a trust coupled with an interest and therefore as the state so also the trust shall survive c. â—der upon â—ortgage 7 Vpon a Mortgage if a stranger that hath no interest in the land Co. ib. 206. b. 4. Littl. § 334. will of his own head take authority to tender the moneys c. the Feoffée is not bound to receive them but if the Mortgager die his heir within the age of 14 yeares and the land being holden in soccage the next of the kinne to whom the Land cannot descend being his Guardian in soccage may tender in the name of the heir because he hath an interest as Guardian in soccage Also if the heir be within the age of 21 yeares and the land is holden by Knight service the Lord of whom the land is holden may make the tender for his interest which he shall have when the Condition is performed for these in respect of their interest are not accounted strangers c. â—ditions in 〈◊〉 upon trust 8 If an Office of Parkership be granted or descend Co. ib. 233. b 4 to an infant or Feme covert and the conditions in Law annexed to that Office which require skill and confidence be not observed and fulfilled the Office is lost for ever because as Littleton saith § 379. that implicite condition of skill c. is as strange as an expresse condition but if a lease for life be made to a feme covert or an infant and they by Charter of feofment alien in fée the breach of this condition in law that is without skill c. is no absolute forfeiture of that estate So it is likewise of a condition in law given by Statute which giveth an entry onely As if an Infant or feme covert with her husband aliens by Charter of feofment in Mortmain this is no bar to the Infant or feme covert because these conditions endeavour to defeat an Interest onely but the other an Interest mixed with a trust and confidence Co. ib. 258. a. 4. 9 If a man makes a letter of attorney to deliver seisin to I. S. upon condition and the Attorney delivereth it absolute this is void Livery of sâ—â—sin And so some hold if the warrant be absolute and he delivereth seisin upon condition the livery is void because he ought to pursue his Warrant c. Co. ib. 265. b. 1. 10 If a man by his last Will devise Power of Râ—vocation that his executors shall sell his land and dieth If the Executors release all their right and title in the land to the heir this is void for that they have neither right nor title to the land but onely a bare authority which is not within the case a release of a right And so it is if Cesty que use had devised that his feoffées should have sold his land Albeit they had made a feoffment over yet might they sell the use for their authority in that case is not given away by the livery because in these cases the power or authority extendeth onely to the use of a stranger and nothing for the benefit of him that makes such release or feoffment It is otherwise where the power or authority doth also respect the benefit of the releasor as in the case of the usual powers of revocation when the feoffor hath power to alter change determine or revoke the uses being intended for his benefit for in that case he may release and where the estates before were defeasible he may by his release make them absolute and seclude himself from any alteration or revocation as it was resolved in Albanies case in the 1 Rep. 112 113. Co. l. 1. 112 113. in Albanies Case Co. ib. 310. 2. 3. Littl. §. 552. 11 Attornment is a kind of power which the tenant c Attornmeâ—t hath to make perfect the grant of a reversion remainder rent c. And therefore it ought to be always strictly and exactly directed according to the grant As if the Lord first grant his services in fée to one and afterwards to another for life and the tenant first attorns to the last grantée In that case he cannot after attorn to the first grantée to make the fée-simple pass for that would not be according to the grant but in that case the Attornment to the first is countermanded And so it is if a reversion expectant upon an estate for life be granted to another in fée and after the Grantor before Attornment confirms the estate of the Lessée in tail the Attornment to the Grantée for the Fée-simple is void In the same manner if a Reversion upon an Estate for years be granted in fée and the Lessor confirm the estate of the Lessée for life he cannot afterwards attorn c. Co. ib. 365. b. 3. 12 Warranties are favoured in Law Warranty Estopples because they are matter of interest whereby a mans estate is the better assured It is otherwise of Estopels because they are matter of limitation whereby an Estate is barred Co. l. 9. 75. b. 3. in Combes Case 13 If man hath a naked authority coupled with a confidence Executors Cestuy quâ— as Executors have to sell land they cannot do it by Attorney but if a man hath authority as absolute Owner of the Land there he may do it by Attorney as Cesty que use might after the Statute of 1 R. 3. and before the Statute of 27 H. 8. For Cesty que use had absolute authority to dispose of the Land at his pleasure without any confidence reposed in him as appears in 11 Eliz. Dyer 283. and there also a Iudgement in 25 H. 8. is cited which agrées with it against the opinion of some Iustices in 9 H. 7. fol. 24. So likewise a Copiholder Copyholâ— Power to make Leâ— who hath not a bare authority onely to surrender but likewise a customary estate of
b. 4. his heires within age of 14 yeares where the Land is holden in Soccage the Guardian in Soccage or within age of 21 yeares the Land being holden by Knight-service the Lord ought to tender the Money for the redemption of the Land but if the heir be an Ideot of what age soever any man may make the tender for him in respect of his absolute Disability for the Law in this and like Cases is grounded upon Charity â—â—pitals 2 Albeit upon the foundation of any lay Hospital or after Co. ib. 342. a. 2 it was ordained that one or more Priests should be there maintained to celebrate Service to the Poore and to pray for the Soul of the Founder and all Christian Soules or the like and that the Poore there should make like Orisons yet such Hospital is not within any of the Statutes of 27 31 32 37 H. 8. or of 1 E. 6. for the makers of those Statutes never intended to overthrow works of Charity but to take away the abuse and such Hospitals being Lay and not Religious and for the most part founded or ordained in that manner â—ensuit in â—aint perâ—ptory 3 In an Attaint if the Plaintfff after appearance be non-suit Co. ib. 139. a. 3. it is peremptorie and the reason is for the faith and credit that the Law in Charity gives to the verdict and for the terrible and fearful judgment that should be given against the first Iury if they should be convicted And therefore upon such non-suit the Plaintiff shall be imprisoned and his sureties amercied Câ—ritable 〈◊〉 4 Good and Charitable Vses are not taken away by the Statute of 23 H. 8. 10. albeit the words of the Statute are general viz. Co. l. 1. 24 a. 2. in Porters ca. all like uses but the intention of the Makers of that Statute was onely to take away Superstitious Vses and not Good and Charitable Vses 〈◊〉 Services 5 Regularly where intire Services are reserved Co. l. 6. 1. b 4. in Bruertons Case if the Lord purchase part of the Land the whole Service is extinct Howbeit when such intire Service are reserved for works oâ— Devotion Piety or Charity as to marry a poor Virgin yearly which Tenure you shall find in 24 H. 8. Br. Tenures 53. or to find a Preacher or Ornaments for such a Church as you have it in 35 H. 6. 6. in such cases albeit the Lord purchase part yet the intire service shall remain Co. l. 10. 28. a. 4. in the Case of Suttons Hospital 6 The Kings Licence by Charter to found an Hospital Chantery Future Corpâ— c. are sufficient to make them Corporations capable of endowments though they be not yet built or prepared for such purposes or imployments because the Kings Charters for Erection of Pious and Charitable Workes are to be taken in the most benigne and beneficial sence Co. l. 10. 92. b. 4. in Leyfields Case 7 Regularly A Deed not shewed good a copy or proof of a Deed shall not be given in evidence to a Iury but the Deed it self ought to be produced yet if a man hath by casualty had all his Writings burnt so as he cannot possibly produce it if that be proved to the Iudges they may in favour of him that hath sustained so great Losse suffer him upon the general issue to prove the Deed by witnesses in evidence to the Iury least they should adde affliction to affliction And if the Iury find it albeit it were not shewed in evidence yet is it good enough as appeares 28. Ass p. 3. And this in charity to him that hath suffered such losse Vide 28 H. 8. Dyer 29. b. Pl. 199. Ho. 136. Floods Case 8 A Devise of Lands to a Colledg is good Devise notwithstanding the Statutes of Mortmain because within the Statute of 43 Eliz. of Charitable Vses under these words limited and appointed See there also the next Case a Devise for the repaire of an High way where albeit the Devise be void yet the Statute of 43 by reason of the said words limited and appointed doth reach it Collisons Case 136 De mortuis nil nisi bonum Littl. §. 399. Co. Inst p. 1. 244. a 3. Co. l. 8. 101 a. 3. in Sir Rich. Lechfords case 1 If there Bastard eigne and Mulier puisne Bastard eigne and Mulier puisne and the Bastard have issue and die seised of the Land without claime of the Mulier in this case the Mulier is barred for ever albeit the Mulier were under age at the time of the discent cast whereas the discent in their cases onely puts him that right hath to his action and doth not barre him for ever And one of the reasons hereof séemes to be because after the Bastards death he shall not be branded by the name of Bastard to the prejudice of him and his issue after him For Justum non est aliquem post mortem facere bastardum qui toto tempore vitae suae pro legitimo habebatur And therefore if there be Bastard eigne and a Daughter Mulier puisne and she be covert at the time of the Discent yet is she barred Also if the Bastard die not but enter into Religion by which a Discent is cast that shall also barre the Mulier for ever Likewise discent of Services Rents Reversions upon an Estate tail or for life c. which barre not the entry of those that right have shall barre the Mulier for ever So if the Bastard die and his issue endow the Bastards wife the Mulier cannot enter upon the widdow but is barred causa qua suprà Co. l. 7. 43. in Kennes Case 2 A Sentence of Divorce may be repealed after the death of the parties Divorce but after their death there can be no Sentence of Divorce given to declare the mariage void for that were to traduce the Dead and to bastardise the issue to the shame of the deceased Co l. 8. 101. b. 4. in Sir Rich. Lechfords case 3 If a Bastard eigne enter and die seised Bastardie his wife being with child of a Sonne and after the Sonne is borne he shall inherit the Land for in as much as the Father died in possession without interruption the Mulier shall not alleadge against the issue Bastardy in his Father after his death 137 And therefore it hateth malice and oppression â—â—rious apâ—â—l 1 The Common Law abhorre malice in séeking the bloud of another without cause And therefore if A. hath the Goods of B. Co. l. 5. 110. a. in Foxleys ca. by bailement or trover and B. brings an appeale of Robbery against A. for taking them feloniously and it is found that they were the Goods of the Plaintiffe and that the Defendant came by them lawfully In this Case the Plaintiff shall forfeit those goods to the King for his false and malicious appeale as it is adjudged in 3 E.
it out of her and so to revive the discontinuance and revest the wrongful Estate in the discontinuée because Remitters tending to the advancement of ancient rights are very much favoured in Law so likewise if lands be given to a man and the heires females of his body and he maketh a feofment in Fée and taketh back an Estate to him and his heires and dieth having issue a Daughter and leaving his wife Grossement enseint with a Sonne in this Case also the Daughter is remitted and albeit the Sonne be afterwards borne he shall not revest the Remitter Litt. §. 678. Co. ib. 357. a. 3 20 If the Baron discontinue the land of the Feme The like and the discontinuée is disseised and after the disseisor demiseth the land to the Baron Feme for term of their lives this is a Remitter to the Feme for Remitters that restore ancient right are so much favoured in Law that the Estate made by the disseisor who cometh to the land by wrong and upon whom the entry of the discontinuée is lawful doth remit the wife and devesteth all out of the discontinue albeit he hath a warranty of the land Litt. §. 693. Co. ib. 363. b. 1 21 When the entry of a man of full age is congeable Right of entry if he take an Estate of the land for life in taile or in fée he is thereby remitted unlesse it be by Indenture matter of record or otherwise whereby he may be concluded or estopt It is otherwise where he hath but right of action for in that Case by taking such an Estate she shall not be remitted and so observe a diversity betwixt right of action and right of entry when his entry is lawful Co. l. 3. 86. a. 4. in the cases of Fines Iustice Windams Ca. 22 Where alienation was made in mortmaine 17 E. 3. 7. El. 20. Tenant not compellable to attorne A fine is levied of land holden in ancient demesne 31 E. 3. Tit. Ancient demesne 16. an infant levied a fine 36 H. 6. 24. Pl. 19. A fine levied of the reversion of land holden in Capite without licence 45 E. 3. 6. or where Tenant in taile of a reversion or remainder before the Statutes of fines 4 H. 7. 32 H. 8. had levied a fine thereof in all these cases and the like the Tenant was not compellable to attorn because the Estate that passed by the fine was not lawful but either prohibited by the Common Law or by some Statute and for the most part were voidable Co. l. 4. 26. a. 4. in the Copihold cases in Melwiches Case 23 The Lessée of a Copi-holder An Ejectione firmae gâ—anted to a Copiholder for a yeare may maintaine an Ejectione firmae for in as much as his term is warranted by the Law by force of the general Custome of the Realme it is reason that if he be ejected he should have an Ejectione firmae for that it is a spéedy course for a Copi-holder to gaine the possession of the land against a stranger being no more then what right requires to be yielded unto him for the recovery of his Estate Co. l. 5. 28. a. in the cases of Executors in Middletons Case 24 An Executor before probat may release an Action Release by Executor before probat good albeit before probat he cannot bring an Action because of the right of Action that is in him at the Common Law it is otherwise of an Administrator for if A. release and after take administration this shall not barre him for the right of Action was not in him at the time of the release made Vide 18 H. 6. 43. b. Greysbrockes Case Plowd 277 278. 21 E. 4. 24. To Executors prove the will and the third refuseth yet he may afterwards release for the ancient right that remaines in him Litt. fol. 117. If one be bound to pay a summe at the day to come before the day he cannot bring an Action of debt yet a release of all actions before the day barres him because of the present right and duty that he then had in him Co. l. 6. 1. b. in Bruertons ca. 25 If a man hold land by the service of ayding the Sheriffe Tenure for Justice not extinct or to be High-Constable of England which are for the advancement of Iustice for the determination of divers cases belong to the Court of the Constable and Marshal and the Sheriffe is a Minister of Iustice or if the tenure be ad custodiendum Recorda Domini Regis as the Abbot of St. Barthelm in Smithfield held as appeares in the Records of the Tower in 7 R. 2. membr 15. in Dorss in these and the like cases if the Lord purchase parcel of the tenancy yet the whole service remaines quia ista concernunt administrationem Justitiae Co. l. 6. 62. a. 3. in Catesbies Case 26 In Catesbies Case in the 5 Rep. the single point in question was A yeare for laps whether the six moneths of laps to give the Bishop power to collate should be accounted by 28 dayes for each moneth or by the halfe yeare and one of the reasons there alleadged for the account by the halfe yeare was this when a computation in such case is ambiguous it is always requisite to determine it for the reliefe remedy of him that right hath viz. of the Patron and for the preservation of his right to allow him the longest time of the two to the end he may not lose his right 〈◊〉 â—5 H. 8. 6 27 Vpon the Stat. of 35 H. 8. 6. to return a Tales Co. l. 10. 103. b. 2 in Alfrid Denbawds ca. albeit the title thereof is usually decem Tales yet the Sheriffe although there be but one Iuror appeare or all be challenged but one may at first return 11 to that one because it is for the spéeding of trials and that Statute being ordained for the furtherance and advancement of expedition in Iustice shall have a benigne and favourable interpretation â—â—ssisee 〈◊〉 28 If a man be disseised of a Mannor F.N.B. 33. q. to which an Advowson is appendant and the Advowson happen to be void the disseisée may present and have a Quare Impedit albeit he hath not entred into the Mannor by reason of the ancient right that is in him â—â—ers â—â—owson 29 If a man traverse an Office found of a Mannor F.N.B. 34. p. to which an Advowson is appendant and upon the traverse the King demiseth the Mannor to him without making any mention of the Advowson and after the Church is void here he that tenders the traverse shall have the presentment if the traverse be found for him â—â—â—ntment de Bishop 30 If a man recover an Advowson and the six moneths are past F.N.B. 38. f yet if the Church be void the Patron may pray a writ to the Bishop and shall have it and if the
transferred and the Law will not in this case suffer the Disseisor to have it because right and wrong cannot cohabit together and therefore it shall rather extinguish So likewise if the Disseisee disseise the heire of the Disseisor here he gaines the estate by wrong viz. by Disseisin having the ancient right in this case if he make Feoffment in fee to another he thereby passeth away the estate which he gained by Disseisin and extinguisheth his ancient right so that the heire when he re-enters shall retaine the Land as well against the Feoffor as against the Feoffee A Disseisor â—â—e onely â—â—ong-doer 20. If a Disseisor make Feoffment in fee Co. l. 11. 51. a. 4. in Rich. Lifords case and the Feoffee cuts down Trees Grasse grain growing upon the ground c. if the Disseisee re-enter he shall not have an Action of trespass vi armis against the Feoffee that came in by title so it is also if he had made a gift in tail or a lease for life or years of the Land because they come in by title but in such case the Disseisee shall recover all the meane profits against the Disseisor as the Disseisee in such cases should have recovered damages against the Disseisor in an Assise at the common Law before the Statute of Glocester cap. 1. There is the same Law also if the Disseisor be disseised an Action of Trespasse doth not lye against the second Disseisor for he may come in by title and if he should be charged he might then be doubly charged viz. both by the Disseisee and also by the first Disseisor and this fiction of Law that the Frank-tenement hath alwayes continued in the Disseisee which ought to be the ground of the Action of Trespass shall not have relation to make him that comes in by title or upon a second Disseisin to be a wrong-doer against whom an Action of Trespass may be brought Howbeit if one disseise me and during the Disseisin he cuts down the Trees Grass graine c. and after I re-enter in this case I shall have an Action of Trespass vi armis against him for the Trees Grass Graine c. for after my regress the Law by fiction as to the Disseisor and his Servants supposeth that the Frank-tenement hath alwayes continued in me and he onely by construction of Law shall be adjudged the wrong-doer which fiction cannot extend to him that comes in by title or upon a second Disseisin c. Co. l. 11. 72. b. 4. in Magdalen Colledge case 21. The Statute of West 2. cap. 5. The King bound The law preserves right Quod quotiescunque aliquis jus non habens tempore hujusmodi custodiarum c. presentaverit c. which was made to suppress wrong shall bind the King And therefore it is well said in 24 E. 3. 41. That the Law is reason and equity to doe right to all and to preserve men from wrong and mischeif for the Law will never make construction against Law Equity and Right Pl. Co. 64. b. 3. â—in Dive and Maninghams case 22. Albeit the Statute of 23 H. 6. 10. Obligation made to defend one for a wrong void which prohibits Sheriffs to take security of persons taken in execution to the end to let them goe at large had not been made yet a Bond had been void at the Common Law For such a Prisoner by the Common Law is not main parnable and then the letting of him goe at large by Mainprise is a wrong and a thing done against the Law and by consequent the Obligation is made to ayde the Sheriff for a wrong done by him in which case even by the order and course of the Common Law the Obligation is void So if an Obligation be made to save one harmless for killing such a man or to commit such a Trespass c. in such cases the Obligation is void by the Common Law And therefore if the Plaintiff in a Replegiare hath a Withernam out of the Common Pleas by force whereof one of the Sheriffs Bayliffs takes foure beasts in the name of Withernam and after delivers them againe to the Defendant and the Defendant is bound to save the Bayliff harmless for the fource beasts who afterwards being damnified brings his Action of debt upon the Obligation In this case as it held by the better opinion in M. 2. H. 4. fol. 9. Fitz. Obligation 13. and Br. 20. the Obligation is void for the Writ of Withernam is Capias in Withernam c. et ea detineas quousque c. so as the Sheriff ought to have kept the Cattell and not to have delivered them to the party for that was a wrong and therefore the Obligation made to defend him for that wrong is void 147. So as none shall take benefit or advantage of their own wrong Litt. S. 19. Co. Inst pars 1. 23. a. 3. 1. Vpon a gift in tail the Rule of Law is Tenure by Knight-service that the Donees and their issues shall do to the Donor and his heires such services as the Donor doth to his Lord Paramont And yet if a man seised in right of his wife of Land holden by knight-Knight-service in tail that Land generally the Donee shall not hold of him by Knight service because his wife held the land and he had nothing but in her right and in that case the Baron having gained a new Reversion by wrong shall not take advantage of his owne wrong but such a Donee shall only hold by Fealty which is incident to all tenures Rent-charge apportioned 2. Regularly a whole Rent-charge is extinct by the purchase Co. ibid. 148. b. 4. or otherwise gaining of the Possession of part of the Land out of which it is issuing And yet in some cases a Rent-charge shall not be wholely extinct where the Grantee claimeth from and under the Grantor As if B. maketh a Lease for life of one Acre to A. and A. is seised of another Acre in fee A. granteth a Rent-charge to B. out of both the Acres and doth waste in the Acre which he holdeth for life B. recovereth in waste In this case the whole Rent is not extinct but shall be apportioned and yet B. claimeth the one Acre under A. and the reason hereof is for that no man shall take advantage of his own wrong Nullus commodum capere potest de injuria sua propria for seeing the waste was committed by the act and wrong of the Lessee he shall not take advantage thereof to extinguish the whole Rent And the whole Rent cannot issue onely out of the other Acre because the Lessor hath the one Acre under the estate of the Lessee and therefore in such case it shall be apportioned So it is also if A. had made a Feoffment in fee and B. had entred for the Forfeiture in that case also the Rent shall be apportioned and not wholely extinct causa qua
the Guardian cannot lose the Wardship An Infant payes releif 3. Littleton saith Litt. S. 112. Co. ibid. 83. b. 4. That the heire of a Tenant by Knight-service ought not to pay releife untill his age of twenty one years yet in some case the Heire shall pay releif when he was within that age at the time of the death of his Ancestor As if a man holdeth Lands of the King by Knight-service in Capite and of a common person other Lands by Knight-service and dyeth his heire being within age here the King hath the Wardship both of body and Lands by his Prerogative untill the full age of the heire and therefore in this case the Heire though he be within age shall immediately pay releif to the other Lord for as the Law giveth away the Wardship to the King by reason of his Prerogative so doth it in respect thereof reserve to the other Lord all that conveniently may be reserved viz. his releif The Lord shall not have the body 4. A man seised of Land holden by Knight-service hath issue a Daughter who takes Baron and hath issue a Son Litt. S. 114. Co. ibid. 84. a. 3. the Tenant dyes and also the Mother in this case the Son shall not be in ward for his body living his Father but yet the Lord shall have the Wardship of the Land untill the full age of the Son for albeit in this case the Law doth give the custody of the body to the Father and barreth the Lord thereof yet the Lord shall have the Wardship of the Land by force of the tenure of the first creation thereof So it is also if the Father marry his heire within age and dyeth in this case also the Lord shall have the Wardship of the Land Co. ibid. 88. b. 3. 5. Where the Father is Guardian of his Son for Land holden in knight-Knight-service this is in respect of his paternall naturall custody Father Guardian in socage accountable and therefore in such case he shall not be answerable for his marryage or custody of his Lands but where the Father is Guardian by reason of a tenure in Socage he must by Law be accountable to the Son both for his marriage and also for the profits of his Lands which he should not be if he had the custody of his eldest son in this case as his Father in respect of nature And because the Law doth appoint him to be Guardian in Socage it compels him also to be accountable for the act of Law doth never any man wrong Co. ibid. 134. b. 2. Anic super carta cap. 15. 28. E. 1. 6. Before the Statute of Articuli super cartas In reall actions fifteen dayes returne in all Summons and Attachments in Plea of Land were contained the terme of fifteen dayes and it appeareth not onely by that Statute but likewise by the ancient Authors of the Law who wrote before that Statute that this was the ancient common Law And the reason of giving so many dayes in reall Actions was the Recovery being so dangerous that the Tenant might the better provide himself both of answers and proofes Co. ibid. 132. b. 2. 7. If I be disseised and my Brother release with Warranty Descent upon Profession and is afterwards profest in Religion and thereby the Warranty descend upon me In this case albeit the Law binds me by the Warranty yet I being his heire the Law gives me by descent such Inheritance as my Brother had at the time of his Profession Co. ibid. 137. a. 3. Litt. S. 203. 8. Albeit by an act in Law a man may have damnum Profession dischargeth wardship yet in such case it is alwayes absque injuria as if a Ward enter into Religion and be profest hereby the Lord loseth the Wardship of the Land which may be said damnum for by such Profession the Ward is civiliter mortuus a dead man in the Law and cannot hold any Inheritance neither can the Guardian continue the Wardship of the land because by the civill death of the Ward the Inheritance is descended to another but this damnum is absque injuria for by such Profession the land descends to another who is either to be in Ward or to pay releif And therefore in such case the law giveth the Guardian no remedy neither by any formed Writ nor by Action upon the case Co. Inst pars 1. 138. a. 3. 9. If Tenant for another mans life by his Deed grant a Rent charge to one for twenty one years Cesty que vie dyeth A annuity good the land evicted hereby the Rent-charge is determined and yet the Grantee may have during the years a Writ of Annuity for the arrearages incurred after the death of Cesty que vie because the Rent charge did determine by the act of God and the course of law Actus Legis nemini facit injuriam So it is also if land out of which a Rent-charge is granted be recovered by an eyent title and thereby the Rent-charge is avoyed yet the Grantee shall have a Writ of Annuity because the Rent-charge is avoyded by the course of law and so it was holden in Wards case cited in Co. l. 2. fo 36. in Heywards case against an opinion obiter in 6 H. 6. 42. a. Vide Max. 114. Ex. 13. Co. ibid. 149. a. 1. 10. A. hath common of Pasture sans number in twenty Acres of land Common sans number not apportioned and ten of these Acres descend to A. the common sans number is intire and uncertaine and cannot be apportioned but shall remaine but if it had been a Common certaine as for ten Beasts in that case the Common â—â—â—dition shall be apportioned And so it is also of common of Estovers Turbary Piscary c. And it is to be observed that in none of these cases or the like the descent which is an act in Law shall worke any wrong to the Ter-tenant for neverthelesse he shall have thereby that which belongeth to him for the Act in Law shall never worke any wrong The like 11. Of Common or Corody certaine as for ten beasts Co. ibid. 164. b. 4. so many Dishes in certaine c. partition amongst Coparceners or Apportionment may be made for this can worke no wrong to the Ter-tenant But if a man have reasonable Estovers as House-boot Hay-boot c Appendant to his Free-hold they are so intire that they shall not be divided amongst Coparceners So likewise if a Corody uncertaine be granted to a man and his heirs and he hath issue diverse Daughters this Corody shall not be divided between them there is the same Law also of Common sans number for in these cases and the like if Estovers Common Piscary or Corody uncertaine should be partable amongst Sisters such partition would worke a wrong to the Ter-tenant Co. ibid. 165. a. 1. who should be opprest and over-charged thereby which the Law
the King by the Charter of the 11 of E. 3. or by Act of Parliament confirming that Charter was because there were divers priviledges granted him which could not possibly be granted by Charter but must of necessity be by Act of Parliament Vide. pl. ibid. Melius inquiâ—â—d 18. A Melius Inquirendum to find what Land I. S. held of King James at the time of his death Co. l. 8. 168. a. 4. in Paris Sloughters case being in the 40 year of Queen Eliz. shall be quasht for the impossibility thereof for it is impossible that I. S. should hold any Land of King James in the 40 yeare of Queen Eliz. he being then King of Scotland 156. Non cogit ad Impossibilia Impotentia excusat Legem Shewing a Deed. 1. If a Deed remaine in one Court it may be pleaded in another Court without shewing it forth Co. Inst pars 1. 231. b. 4. because he cannot have it out of the other Court and Lex non cogit ad impossibilia vide Co. l. 5. 74. b. 4. in Wymarks case Claime 2. Regularly Litt. S. 434. Co. ibid. 258. a. 3. where a man doth lesse then the commandment or authority committed to him there the commandment or authority being not pursued the Act is void and where a man doth that which he is authorized to doe and more there it is good for that which is warranted and void for the rest yet both these rules have divers exceptions and amongst the rest this for one that if a man be sick that he cannot go to the Land nor any part thereof to make his claime and he commands his Servant to do it and the Servant dare not go to the Land for feare of some bodily hurt in this case if the Servant go as neere the Land as he dare and there make claime for his Master that shall suffice albeit his Master bade him go to the Land because Impotentia excusat legem for seeing the Master cannot and the Servant dare not enter into the Land it sufficeth that he come as neere the Land as he dare Descent 3. Descent shall not take away Entry of a man in Prison at the time of the Descent cast because he could not make continuall claime Litt. S. 436. Co. ibid. 259. a. 2. when he was in Prison being there kept as it is presumed in Law in salva arcta custodia without intelligence of things abroad Descent 4. A Descent cast during the vacation of an Abbey Litt. S. 443. Co. ibid. 263. b. 2 shall not take away the Entry of the next Successor because seeing by the death of the Abbot which is the Act of God no person is able to make continuall claime therefore a Descent during that time shall not prejudice the Successor for Impotentia excusat legem Co. l. 5. 22. a. 3. in Laughters case 5. Where the Condition of an obligation is in the disjunctive Condition disjunctive viz. for the Obligor either to do one thing or another and both the things possible at the time of the delivery and afterwards one of them becomes impossible by the Act of God in this case the Obligor is not bound to perform the other for Impotentia excusat legem Co. l. 5. 115. a. 3. in Wades case 6. If a man be bound to pay 40000 l. at such a day Tender of money if he tender it in baggs it is sufficient for it is not possible it should be numbred within the compasse of one day Co. l. 6. 21. b. in Butler and Goodalls case 7. Lawfull Imprisonment without Covin Non-residence the want of a Parsonage House and sicknesse without fraud when the Incumbent by the advice of his Phisitian removes for better aire or the like are good excuses for non-residence against the statute of 21 H. 8. cap. Co. l. 8. 172. Hales case 8. If the Heire holding of the King by Knights Service tender his Livery that includes tender of Homage Tender of Livery and therefore after such tender he may sell any part of his Land and if he dye after tender and before Livery sued out the King shall not have the profits of his Lands longer then to the time of the Tender because by his death which is the Act of God the shewing out of his Livery is become impossible and Impotentia excusat legem Co. l. 3. 73. a. 1. in Doctor Husseyes case 9. A Feme Covert is not within the Statute of Westminst 2. cap. 39. Ravishment of Gard VV. 2. c. 39. concerning Ravishment of Ward for the Law that disables her to have any thing wherewithall to satisfie the value of the Marriage doth also free her from the punishment of Banishment and Imprisonment because it is impossible she should satisfie it when she hath nothing to do it withall for Lex non cogit ad impossibilia c. vide Max. 34. Co. l. 10. 139. b. 3. in Knightlies case 10. If a man be bound to repaire a Wall against the flowing of the Sea if it fall into decay by his default and negligence Wast a wall of the sea he shall be solely charged with the repaire thereof but if it be overthrown or endamaged by the violence of the water without his fault by the Stat. of 23 H. 8. they are to be equally charged who have losse by it for Impotentia excusat Legem vide Pl. ibid. 157. It disfavoureth Falshood Fraud and Covin Vide Dyer 294. 8. Co. Inst p. 1. 17. b. 3. 1. A man hath as absolute ownership and property in an Advowson Advowson how pleaded as he hath in Lands or Rents yet he shall not plead that he is seised thereof In Dominico ut feodo because that Inheritance savouring not De domo cannot either serve for the sustentation of him or his Houshold neither can any thing be received for the same for defraying of charges and therefore he cannot say that he is seised thereof In Dominico suo de feodo Whereby it appeareth how the Common Law doth detest Symmony and all corrupt Bargaines for Presentation to any Benefice but that Idonea persona for the discharge of the cure should be presented freely without Expectation of any thing nay the Common Law is so cautelous in this point that the Plaintiff in a Quare Impedit should recover no Damages for the losse of his Presentation untill the Statute of Westminster 2. cap. 5. And that is the reason that Guardian in Soccage shall not present to an Advowson because he can take nothing for it whereof to make Account for by the Law he can meddle with nothing that he cannot account for So in a Writ of Right of Advowson the Patron shall not alledge the Explees in himselfe but in the Incumbent For which Reasons of an Advowson a man shall plead that he is seised De advocatione ut de feodo jure
implies a warranty nevertheless because for the most part a warranty is contained in a Charter the writ retains the same form and in such cases the words unde chartam habet c. are not material Escheat 17 If a man be condemned to be hangd for felony and happen to die after such judgement and before execution thereof by the officer F.N.B. 144. b. yet the writ of Escheat shall say pro quo suspensus fuit c. and it is not material whether he be hanged or no but the writ retains that form because for the most part after such judgement the felon is hanged 192 Frequentia Actus multum operatur Fine Non-claim 1 A. possessed of divers lands in D. for years at will Co. l. 3. 79. b. 2. in Fermors case and by Copy and seised of other lands there in fée demises the whole to B. for life and then levies a fine to B. c. of so many acres as amount to the whole land continues possession and payes the rents to the Lord five years pass yet is not the Lord barred by his non-claim because in as much as the lessée had lands in fée simple in the same Town the fine shall be presumed to be levied of such lands there whereof it is lawfull to levy a fine and then as for the quantity albeit the fine contain more acres than his own fee simple lands that can prove nothing to pass the Lease or Copy land because it is the common use and practice almost in all fines to insert more acres therein than the lands intended to be passed by such fines do contain Corporation 2 Albeit a Corporation have a Commencement by Charter Co. l. 4. 77. b. in the case of Corporations and by consequence within memory and it be expressed in their charter that the choice of their Maior Bailifs and other principal officers shall be by the Commonalty yet if by a continual usage they have chosen them by a certain select number of the principal of the Commonalty or of the Burgesses albeit no constitution can be shewed to warrant such election yet such election is adjudged good in Law because it it hath been so often put in execution Vide supra 189. 25. Duâ—chy of Cornwall 3 Ed. 3. gave unto the Black Prince the Dukedom of Cornwall Co. l. 8. 21. b. 1. in the Princes case c. habendum et tenendum eidem duci ipsius haeredum suorum Regum Angliae filiis primogenitis et dicti loci ducibus in regno Angliae haereditarie successuris c. This grant was adjudged fee simple and not at will as some would have had it And one of the reasons was because divers Acts both of E. 3. and the Black Prince himself did confirm the same to be fee simple and not any inferiour estate for E. 3. in the 14. year of his reign when he was to make war against Philip de Valois King of France which was but 3. years after the said Charter grants to the Prince by the name of Edward Duke of Cornwall to be Lieutenant of the Realm so long as the King should be beyond sea Then in 21 E. 3. the Prince for a fine of 1000 marks demiseth the Stanneries to Redman rendring 3000 marks rent per annum And divers other Letters Patents were cited in the Princes case in the 8. Rep. to the like purpose all which did confirm the said estate of the Prince to be fee simple For frequentia actus multum adjuvat Vide supra 71 4. Also another reason to prove the title of the Prince to the Dutchy of Cornwall was that ever since the creation thereof which was in the 11 of Ed. 3. in the succession of divers ages it had béen enjoyed according to the said Charter by the eldest son of the Kings of England c. for which sée the book at large 193 It alwayes construeth things to the Best And therefore Co. Inst part 1. 87. b. 3. 1 If a man be seised of a rent charge rent seck common of pasture Guardian Infant under 14. or such like Inheritances which do not lie in tenure and dieth his heir within the age of 14 years In this case the heir may choose his Guardian but if he be of such tender years as he can make no choice then if the father hath made no disposition of the custody of the child the Law adjudged it most fit that the next of kin to whom the Inheritance cannot descend should have the custody of him and whosoever taketh the rent c. the heir shall charge him in an accompt Co. ibid. 98. a. 3. 2 Where an Abbot holding in Frankalmoigne together with his Covent aliens the land to a Secular man he cannot hold as they held Frankalmoigne Socage viz. in Frankalmoigne yet because of necessity he must hold the land of some person and by some service the Law in this case creates and appoints him the lowest and easiest tenure that is viz. to hold the land of the Lord in socage by fealty only which is incident to every tenure Co. ibid. 99. b. 3. so likewise if the Seigniory be transferred to a stranger by act in Law and thereby the privity is altered In such case also the tenure in Frankalmoigne is changed to a tenure in socage by fealty And therefore if there be Lord Mesn and Tenant and the Tenant is an Abbot who holds of the Mesn in Frankalmoigne Here if the Mesn die without heir so as the Mesnalty escheats to the Lord Paramount the Abbot shall hold immediately of the Lord Paramount by fealty only because he cannot hold of him in Frankalmoigne 148 35. Co. ibid. 146. b. 3 3 If a Villein descend to two Coparceners Intire Inheritances this is an intire inheritance albeit the Villein himself cannot be divided the Law hath ordained that the profit of him shall be divided for one Coparcener may have the service one day one wéek c. and the other another day or wéek c. And for the same reason it is that a woman shall be endowed of a Villein viz. to have him every third day wéek or c. Likewise if an Advowson descend to Coparceners the Law hath so ordered it that they shall present by turns Et sic de similibus In all which cases the Law hath contrived and established the best way and order that may be for the parting of Intire inheritances which are otherwise in their nature indivisible Co. ibid. 214. â— 2. 4 If two joyntenants the one for life and the other in fee Iâ—intenants Tenant for life Reversioner joyn in a Lease for life or a gift in tail reserving a rent In this case the rent shall inure to them both for if the particular estate determine they shall be joyntenants again in possession But if tenant for life and he in the reversion joyn in a
it enures as it may by Law to a grant of the reversion c. Attornment 23 Albeit an Infant be not compellable to attorn unless the grant be by fine in a per quae servitia Co. l 9. 85 b. 3 Conys case yet upon the grant of a seigniory without fine if he attorn that shall bind him and he shall not have his age so likewise attornment by him upon the grant of a reversion is good albeit he cannot be forced therevnto Vide supra 17. Covin 24 Covin shall never be intended or presumed in Law except it be expresly averred quia odiosa inhonesta non sunt in lege praesumenda Co. l. 10. 56. a. 3. in the Chan. of Oxf. case in facto quod se habet ad bonum malum magis de bono quam de malo praesumendum est And so it was adjudged in the case of Meriel Littleton Trin. 10 â—ac in B. R. Quod vide ubi supra Co. l. 10. 67. b. 3. in the Churchwardens case 25 When two Constructions may be made of the Kings grant The Kings Charter and by force of the one the grant may according to the Rule of Law be adjudged good and by the other it may be also taken by the Law to be void In such case for the honor of the King and the benefit of the Subject such construction shall be made that the Kings Charter may take effect as it was resolved in the case of the Churchwardens of Saint Saviours in Southwark Co. l. 10. 67. b. 3. and in Sir John Molins case Co. l 6. 5. See also Priddle and Nappers case Co. l. 11. 11. a 4 The E. of Rutlands case supra 22. The L. Staffords case Co. l. 8. 77. The Lord Chandos case Co. l. 6. 55. The E. of Cumberlands case Co. l. 8. 166. 12 E. 4. 44. F. N. B. 148. f. 26 If the heir within age endow the feme of more land than she ought to have assigned in Dower Dower assigned or if the Guardian endow the feme of more than a third part of the land the heir at his full age shall have a writ of Admeasurement of Dower against the feme Howbeit in such case she shall retain so much of the land so assigned as amounts to her Dower because it was a lawfull act Plea in barr only the surplusage shall be taken from her what she had above such third part assigned unto her Pl. Co. 28. b. 1. in Calthr and Bevish case 27 In an Assise if the tenant plead in barr descent to the plaintif and two others and that he hath the estate of one of them In this case the plea is good and yet it may be that he had his estate by disseisin in which case he is also a disseisor to the plaintif for he cannot be a disseisor to one and not to the other or he may gain his estate lawfully and so a doubt ariseth whether the tenant is in lawfully or by wrong Howbeit in this case it shall be taken that he had his estate lawfully and not tortiously or by wrong and therefore such plea in barr is good Vid 189. 40. Pl. Co. 93. a. 4. The Assise of Fresh force in London 28 In the Assise of Fresh force by Pannel against Moore and the Corporation of Mercers in London Assise of Fresh force Moores invitation of the plaintif to dine with him and to see the Cellar c. was adjudged no entry by the plaintif after the last continuance because it was rather to be esteemed a lawfull than a tortious act being by the consent of Moore one of the defendants Vide supra 9. 29 Cestuy que use for term of life the remainder over in tail Cestuy que use for life after the Statute of 1 R. 3. 1. makes a lease for the term of the life of the lessee Dyer 57. b. 1. 35 H. 8. and dies and the lessee continues his estate In this case the lessée is but tenant by sufferance for the lease makes no discontinuance of the Remainder because he had authority by the said Statute to make a lease grant or feoffment and that ought to be understood of such an estate as he may lawfully make Dyer 150. b. 86. 3 4. P.M. 30 By the Statute of 32 H. 8. 1. that giveth power to devise two parts of a mans land holden in Knight service Devise of lands a devise of the whole had been good for two parts albeit the Statute of explanations 34 35 H 8. 5. had not béen made Dyer 286. 43 11 Elâ—z 31 In an Ejectione firmae the plaintif declares of a lease made unto him the 8. day of May Ejectione firmae to have and hold for 21 years extunc proxime sequent Virtute cujus postea viz. eodem 8 day of May he entred This seems to be good and that he entred not as a disseisor before the lease commenced for extunc is immediately after the delivery and shall not be intended the morrow after the date and the word postea declares that he entred not before the lease was made Tamen Quaere for the practice is otherwise at this day making the term to commence at some feast or day before the day of delivery to prevent the said exception Dyer 359 3. 2. E. 34 A. Tenant of Prince Arthur as Earl of Chester Wardship in Knight service in Capite dies and B. his eldest son is in ward B. dies without issue and upon a Devenerunt C. was found brother and heir to B. and within age C. at full age pursues livery by writ to the Escheator per nomâ—n B. filius haeres A. And now the question was whether or no the possession still continued in Qu. Eliz. And it was adjudged that it did not but that it was a good livery for if he had not been named heir to any it had béen good because constat de persona Tenants in Common 35 If a tenant in Common enter into the land generally Hob. 120. Smales and Dale without expressing whether it be for himself alone or both for himself and his companion yet it shall be taken according to right as under construction of Law and therefore construed lawfull and not that he intended to oust his companion of his part by tort 195 Non praestat impedimentum quod de Jure non sortitur effectum Vide 195 13. Bastard eigne Mulier Puisne 1 If the Bastard eigne after the decease of the father enter Co. Inst part 1. 245. b. 1. and the King seiseth the land for some contempt supposed to be committed by the Bastard for which no freehold or inheritance is lost but only the profits of the land by way of seisure and the Bastard die and his issue is upon his petition restored to the possession In this case for that the seisure was without
use and profit of the lessor for albeit a thing may sometimes sound for the profit of a man and not for his damage yet it is not lawful for a man to do a wrong As if a man see his neighbours beasts in another mans soil Damage feasant Damage feasant it is not lawfull for him to chase them and if he so do the owner shall have an action of trespass against him yet in so doing he doth a good work and saves the owner from the damages for depasturing his cattel Trespass 4 In 21 H. 7. A Parson brings an action of trespass for his Grain carried away the defendant saith Dyer ibid. pl. 39. that the Grain was severed from the 9. parts and in danger to be spoiled with Cattel whereupon the defendant carried them to the plaintifs own barn and there lodged them And yet this was adjudged no good plea because the carrying of them away was a tort So if a Commoner make a trench in the soil where he hath Common whereby the soil is made better yet he is a trespassor and subject to an action for it 5 Hob. 12. Holder against Tayler and 220. Wrenhams case who was censured in the Star chamber 1000 l. for publishing a scandalous book against a decrée of the Lo. Ch. Bacons 197 The Law favoureth things for the Common-wealth Incapable Officers 1 If an Office either of the grant of the King or Subject Co. Inst pars 1. 3. b. 2. which concerns the administration proceeding or execution of Iustice or the Kings revenue or the Commonwealth or the interest benefit or safety of the Subject or the like If these or any of them be granted to a man that is unexpert and hath no skill or science to exercise or execute the same the grant is meerly void and the party disabled by Law and incapable to take the same pro commodo Regis populi for only men of skill knowledge and ability to exercise the same are capable thereof to serve the King and his people So an Infant or Minor is not capable of an office of Stewardship of the Court of a Manor either in possession or reversion Neither yet is a man though never so skilfull and expert capable of a judicial office in reversion but must expect until it fall in possession Likewise bargaining or giving of money or any manner of reward c. for offices shall make such a purchasor incapable thereof because it is to be presumed he will by bribery extortion and other undue means make his stake good again to the prejudice of the Commonwealth which learning is worthy to be known but more worthy to be put in due execution Dower Câ—stles 2 Of a Castle that is only maintained for the private use and habitation of the owner a woman shall be endowed But of a Castle Co. ibid. 31. b. 3. that is maintained for the necessary defence of the Realm a woman shall not be endowed And so it was adjudged in the Court of Common Pleas where in a writ of Dower the demand was De tertia parte Castri de Hilderker in Comitatu Northumb. And the Statute of Magna Charta cap. 7. whereby it is provided Nisi domus illa sit Castrum is to be understood of a Castle for the necessary and publique defence of the Realm And this agreeth also with antient Records the effect whereof is Non debent mulieribus assignari in dotem Castra quae fuerunt virorum suorum et quae in Guerra existunt vel etiam homagia servitia aliquorum in Guerra existentia And so are the old books to be intended as it was resolved Trin. 17 Eliz. in the Court of Common Pleas. Vide infra 35. Co. ibid. 39. a. 4. Littl. §. 48. 5 If a man seised of 40 acres of land 20 holde by Knight service Dower de la plus beale and the other 20 in Socage die thereof seised his heir being under the age of 14 years his feme shall be endowed de la plus beale out of the Socage land and not out of the Knight service land for the Common Law giveth this privilege to the land holden by Knight service that it shall not be dismembred but in such case the whole dower shall be taken out of the Land holden in Socage And the reason is for that Knight service land is for the defence of the Realm which is pro bono publico and therefore to be favoured Co. ibid. 47. a. 4. 4 Things shall not be distrained for rent Distress which are for the benefit and maintenance of trades and by consequent of the Common-wealth and are there by authority of Law as a horse in a Smiths shop shall not be distrained for rent issuing out of the shop nor the horse c. in the Hostry nor the materials in a Weavers shop for making of cloth nor cloth or garments in a Taylors shop nor Sacks of Corn or meal in a Mill or Market nor any thing distrained before for damage fesant for it is in the custody of the Law and the like Co. ibid. 55. a. 4. 5 If Tenant at will sow the ground with grain hemp flax Tenant at will shall reap his câ—op or the like or set roots or sow or set any other thing which will yield an annual profit and after the same is so planted the lessor will out him or if the lessee dieth yet he or his executors shall have that years crop And the reason is for that the estate of the lessor is uncertain and therefore lest the ground should be unmanured which would be hurtfull to the Commonwealth he shall reap the Crop which he hath sowed in peace albeit the lessor doth determine his will before it be ripe There is the same reason also for every other particular estate that is uncertain And therefore if tenant for life sow the ground and dieth his executors shall have the Corn for that his estate was uncertain and determined by the act of God And there is the same Law of a lessee for years of the tenant for life So likewise if a man be seised of land in right of his wife and soweth the ground and dieth his executors shall have the Corn and if his wife die before him he himself shall have it If tenant pur terme dauter vie sow the land and Cestuy que use dieth the lessee shall have the corn If tenant by Statute merchant soweth the ground and then a sudden and casual profit falleth by which he is satisfied he shall have the embleaments If a man seised in fee hath issue a daughter and dieth his wife being enseint with a Son and the daughter soweth the land and then the son is born yet the daughter shall have the Corn because her estate was lawful and defeated by the act of God and it is good for the Commonweaith that the ground be sown But if husband and wife he
jointenants of the land and the husband soweth the ground and the land surviveth to the wife 8 Ass pl. 21. 8 E. 3. 54. Dyer 316. It is said that she shall have the Corn and not the executors and the Law seems to be so because they were as one person in Law and held by intietties Co. ibid. 75. b. 4. 6 The tenure by Knight service being at first ordained for the defence of the Commonwealth both against domestique insurrections and forein invasions a Militia being indeed the chief pillar that supports a Commonwealth the due observance thereof was strictly enjoyned by the Laws of Edward the Confessor Knight service where you shall find it thus provided Lamb. 135. Debent enim universi liberi homines c. secundum feodum suum secundum tenementa sua arma habere illa semper prompta conservare ad tuitionem regni servitium dominorum suorum juxta praeceptum Domini Regis explendum et peragendum And William the Conquerer confirmed that Law in these words Statuimus et firmiter praecipimus quod omnes Comites Barones Milites et Servientes universi liberi homines totius regni nostri praedicti habeant teneant se semper in armis et in equis ut decet et oportet et quod sint semper prompti parati ad servitium suum integrum nobis explendum peragendum cum semper opus adfuerit secundum quod nobis debent de feodis et tenementis suis de jure facere c. The like 7 The tenure by Knight service because it was instituted for the Guard and defence of the Commonwealth was so much favoured in Law Co. ibid. 76. b. 4. that betwixt the making of the Statutes of 4 H. 7. 17. and 27 H. 8. 10. of Uses there might lie two wardships for one and the same land as if Cestuy que use before the Statute of 27 H. 8. had died his heir within age the Lord should have had the wardship of his heir by force of the Statute of 4 H. 7. and if the feoffée had died his heir within age the Lord should have had the wardship of his heir also viz. by the course of the Common Law And at the Common Law before the making of those Statutes there might be two wardships in respect of the same land as if tenant by Knight service had made a gift in tail the remainder in fee and tenant in tail had made a feoffment in fee and died his heir within age the Lord should have had the wardship of him and if the feoffee had died his heir within age Co. ibid. 77. a. 1. the Lord should have also had the wardship of his heir and of the land so likewise if tenant by Knight service make a gift in tail and the donee maketh a feoffment in fee and the donee dieth his heir within age the donor shall have the wardship of him because he is his tenant in right but if the feoffee dieth his heir within age the Lord paramount shall have the wardship of his heir because en fait he is tenant to him c. And the Common Law did not remedy this inconvenience because that tenure was deemed serviceable for the Commonwealth Tillage 8 Agriculture or Tillage is much favoured and of great esteem Co. ibid. 85. b. 1. because it is very profitable for the Commonwealth concerning which the goodness of the habit is best known by the privation For by laying of lands used in tilth to pasture six main inconveniences doe daily encrease 1. Idleness Co. l. 4. 39. a. in Tirringhams case which is the beginning and ground of all mischiefs 2. Depopulation and decay of Towns 3. Husbandry which is one of the greatest Commodities of the Realm is decayed 4. Churches are destroyed and the service of God neglected by diminution of Church-livings as by decay of Tithes c. 5. Injury and wrong is done to Patrons and Gods Ministers And 6. The defence of the land against forein Enemies is enfeebled and impaired the bodies of Husbandmen being more strong and able and patient of cold heat and hunger than of any other from which Inconveniences necessarily follow these consequences 1. The displeasure of Almighty God 2. The subversion of the Policy and good government of the Realm And all this appeareth in our books And therefore the Common Law giveth arable land antiently called Hyde or Gaine the precedence before Meadows Pastures Woods Mines or any other ground whatsoever And averia carucae the beasts of the Plough have in some cases more privileges than other cattel c. This imployment was also of high estimation amongst the antient Romans Co. Inst part 1. 161. a. 1. in so much that the grave Senators themselves would put their hand to the plough c. If the Lord will distrain averia carucae where there is a sufficient distress besides the tenant may make rescous O Fortunatos nimium sua si bona norunt Agricolas quibus ipsa procul discordibus armis Fundit humo facilem victum justissima Tellus Virg. in Georg. Co. ibid. 99. a. 2. 9 An Abbot or Prior c. who holdeth lands by Knight service Abbot Prior. albeit he ought not in respect of his profession to serve in war in proper person yet must he find a sufficient man conveniently arrayed for the warr to supply his place And if he can find none then must he pay Escuage c. for his possession doth not privilege him but that the Kings service in his warr must be done which belongeth to his tenure and concerneth both the honor and safety of the Common-wealth Co. ibid. 127. a. 4. Bract. lib. 6. fo 6. 10 The life and members of every subject are under the safeguard and protection of the King Life and Member for as Bracton saith Vita et membra sunt in potestate Regis And herewith agréeth a notable Record Pasch 19 E. 1. coram Rege Rot. 36. Northt Vita membra sunt in manu Regis to the end that they may serve the King and the Commonwealth when occasion shall be offered And therefore if the Lord mayhem his Villein the King shall punish him for mayheming his subject Villein by fine ransom and imprisonment until the fine and ransom be paid because he hath thereby disabled him to do the King and Common-wealth service Co. ibid. 130. a. 4. 11 The Protections Quia Profecturus which concerns services of warr as the Kings souldier Protections c. and Quia Moraturus which concerns wisdom and counsel as the Kings Ambassador or Messenger pro negotiis regni being for the publique good of the Realm privat mens actions and sutes must be then suspended for a convenient time for Jura publica anteferenda privatis and again Jura publica ex privatis promiscue decidi non debent And the cause of granting
sorts Latine words Sensible and Insensible the first is good and congruous Latin allowed by Gramarians And this without question is within the Statute of 36 E. 3. 15. which ordaines that all pleas shall be entred and enrolled in Latin The second sort are such words as these Messuagium Tostum Gardinum Bruera Jampna c. These and the like are allowed not only in Pleas but also in originall writs for these are such words as are knowne to the Sages of the Law and are also within the Statute of 36 E 3. such words as are called words of Art and are frequent also in other Sciences as amongst the Civilians Reprisalia Feuda Shopa Sollaria c. who use many times to explaine them by Anglicè c. as Sollaria anglicè Ware-houses The Physicians also use Brothium for broth and the like The third sort is false and incongruous Latin this shall abate an originall writ but shall not make a Iudicial writ count pleading or judgement vicious for false Latin shall in such cases be amended And therefore a fortiori such Latin or false English shall not avoid a grant or déed when the intention of the parties may appeare M. 3 4. El. R. 1350. M. 44 45. R. 1031. 9 H. 6 7. 9 H. 7. 16. 2 H 4 8. M. 11. Jac. as in a bill or bond Octogenta Septungenta Wiginti Sewteene or the like shall be taken for Octoginta Septingenta Viginti Seaventeene c. Also when there is no latin for a word as for a Stirrup Velvet c. Strapedia Velvetum c. may be used because they have the countenance of latin so also Operimentum for a Rugge Howbeit in such case for explanation sake it will be fit also to insert the word Anglice as Operimentum anglice a Rugge Duas virgatas velveti anglice of velvet c. The fourth and last sort are insensible words as in a case of a Replevin P. 36 El. Gawins case Vitrium for Vitrum glasse yet in that case the Court did incline onely to adjudge it false latin because it had the countenance of latin and the Court was sufficiently ascertained that glasse was meant by it P. Co. 85. b. in Partridges Case 7 If I give you a quart of wine you shall not have the quart-pot Phrase of speech but if I give you an Hogshead of wine you shall have the Hogshead for the phrase of the language expresseth the intent so 11 acres belonging to a Messuage will sufficiently declare which 11 acres are meant although land is not properly said to belong to an house but the house to land Co. l. 2. 72. a. the Lord Cromwels Case 8 Note in Docwras case 27 H. 8. 18. a. in Littl. cap. conditions 14. Where a Proviso makes a condition and where not El. Dyer 311. 4. and 5. P. M. Dyer 152 that this word Proviso makes a condition But when the Proviso depends upon another sentence or hath reference to another part of the deed it never makes a condition but a qualification or limitation of the sentence or part of the déed unto which it referres as in 5 El. 22. inter Eyre and Orme a notable case so in 7 H. 6. a lease without impeachment of wast provided that he shall not make voluntarie wast In Littl. Sect. 220. A grant of rent charge provided that the grantée shall not charge his person Tramingtons case in the K. B. P. 16. El. Rot. 273 there a Proviso tending to a qualification and to explaine a precedent sentence makes not a condition And 3 4. P. M. 150. Parkers case a Proviso amounts to a covenant see 28 H. 8. Dyer 13 b. Utrumque 9 Three were bound in an obligation thus Dyer 19. 114. 28 H. 8. Obligamus nos utrumque nostrum per se pro toto in solid The question was whether or no this obligation was several And one of the Iudges was of opinion that it was not several because utrumque is properly of two viz. both And it should have béen quemlibet nostrum c. when more than two are bound Howbeit it séemed to the Court that the obligation was good and several Vide 31. 12. Confirmation 10 If the disseisée confirme the estate of the disseisor Littl. Sect. 519 520. though it be but for an hour he shall have a lawfull estate in fee simple for ever quia confirmare est firmum facere Exposition of illa 11 If the King or a common person grant omnia illa messuagia in tenura Johannis Browne scituat in Wells Co. l. ◠33. a. Dodingtons Case whereas in truth they lie in D. in this case because the grant is general and is restrained to a certaine Towne the Patentée or Grantée shall not have any lands out of that Towne unto which the generaltie of the grant referres and this case is the stronger because of the Pronoune illa for omma illa messuagia c. maketh necessary reference as well to the towne as to the tenure of I. B. so that if either faile the generall grant is void for illa is not satisfied untill the sentence be ended and illa governs the whole sentence to the full point Vide infra max. 10. cap. 5. Commencement of a Lease 12 Indentures of demise were ingrossed bearing date the 26 of May Anno 25. Co. l. 5. 1. a. Claytons Case Eliz. to have and to hold for three yeares from henceforth and the Indentures were delivered at 4 of the clock in the afternoone of the 20 day of June Anno praedicto Eliz. In this case from henceforth shall be accounted from the time of the delivery of the Indentures and not by any compatation from the date for from henceforth is as much as to say from the making or from the time of the delivery of the Indentures or a confectione presentium because the confection or making of the Lease commenceth by the delivery and these words from henceforth or any other words of the Indenture are not of any force or effect untill the delivery Quia traditio facit loqui tantum Vide suprà 2. 9 In Conjunctivis oportet utrumque Bract. l. 2. fol. 19. a. in disjunctivis sufficit alteram partem esse veram Conjunction copulative 1 If lands be given in taile upon condition Littl. Sect. 364 that if the tenant alien in fée fée taile or for terme of life c. and also if all the issues of tenant in tail die without issue that then it shall be lawfull for the donor and his heires to re-enter Taile here the right of the intaile may this way after discontinuance be preserved to the issue in taile if any be so that upon entry of the donor and his heirs the estate taile shall not be defeated for such condition Condition And yet in this case if the tenant in taile or his heires make any discontinuance
homage Ancestrell again so it is if a Copihold escheat and the Lord maketh a feoffment in fée upon Condition and entreth for the condition broken it shall never be Copihold again because in both these cases the custome or prescription which supported and was the cause of the tenure is interrupted and that being once broken is become remedilesse The land evicted the Annuity is gone The mariage failing the land revests 17 If a man grant an annuitty ppruna acra terrae Co. ibid. 204. a. 2. if the acre of land be evicted by an elder title the annuity shall cease so if it be pro decimis and the grantee be disturbed or pro consilio or quòd praestaret consilium and the grantee refuse to give counsel the annuity shall in these cases cease likewise if a woman give lands to a man and his heires causa matrimonii praelocuti in this case if the man refuse to marry her she shall have the land againe to her and her heires but it is otherwise in case of a man Co. ibid. 238. a. 4. 18 If a disseisor make a gift in taile A dying seised and yet no descent to take c. and the Donee discontinueth the fée and after disseise the discontinuee and dieth seised this discent shall not take away the entry of the diseissée For the discent of the Fée simple is vanished and gone by the Remitter And albeit the issue be in by force of the estate taile yet the Donée died not seised of that estate and of necessity there must be a dying seised Co. ibid. 239. a. 2. 19 When the degrées are past so as a writ of Entry in the Post doth lye yet by event it may be brought within the degrées again A writ out of the degrees may be reduced as if the disseisor enfeoffe A. who enfeoffes B. who enfeoffes C. or if the disseisor die seised and the land descends to A. and from him to B. and from him to C. Now are the degrées past and yet if C. enfeoffe A. or B. now is it brought within the degrées again Co. ibid. 242. b. 1. 20 If the eldest sonne hath issue and dieth A descent when privity of bloud faileth and after his decease the younger sonne or his heire entreth and many descents cast in his line yet may the heires of the eldest sonne enter in respect of the privity of bloud and of the same claime by one title But if the younger sonne make a feoffment in fée and the feoffée dies seised that discent shall take away the entry of the eldest in respect that the privity of bloud faileth Co. ibid. 285. a. 4. 21 If an action of wast be brought by Baron and feme in remainder in special taile Death voidâ— the action and hanging the writ the wife dieth without issue the writ shall abate because every kind of action of wast must be ad exhaeredationem Co. ibid. 291. a. 4. Execut. 7. 22 If the bodie of a man be taken in execution upon a Ca. sa and the Plaintiffe releaseth all actions Release of debt excuseth execution yet shall he still remaine in execution but if he release all debts duties or judgements he is to be discharged of the execution because the debt or the dutie or the judgement which is the cause of the execution is discharged Co. ibid 312 a. 1. 23 The Reason that Littleton giveth of the difference betwéen a rent-service and a rent-charge is Avowry for a rent service upon the person for that in rent-service the avowry shall allwayes be made upon the person but in rent-charge never upon the person but upon the Land charged Now here it may be said that this reason is taken away by the Statute of 21 H. 8. 19. For by that Statute the Lord needs not avow for any rent or service upon any person in certaine and then by Littletons reason there néedeth no privity to the attornment of a Seigniory for say they Cessante causa ratione legis cessat lex As at the Common Law no aide was grantable of a stranger to an Avowrie because the Avowrie was made of a certaine person but now the Avowrie being made by the said Act of 21 H. 8. upon no person therefore the reason of the Law being changed the Law it selfe is also changed and consequently in an Avowrie according to that Act aid shall be granted of any man and the like in many other cases which case is granted to be good Law But albeit the Lord as hath béen said may take benefit of the Statute yet may he avow still at his election upon the person of his tenant and albeit the manner of the Avowrie be altered yet the privity which is the true cause of the said difference remaineth as to an Attornment Littl. § 568. Co. ibid. 316. a. 3. 24 If the reversion of Lessée for life be granted Upon alienation the grantee shall attorn and Lessée for life assigne over his estate the Lessée cannot attorne but the attornment of the Assignée is good because as Littleton saith it behoveth that the tenant of the land do attorne and after the assignement there is no tenure or attendance c. betwéen the Lessée and him in reversion so likewise if Lessée for life assigneth over his estate upon condition he having nothing in him but a condition shall not attorne but the assignée may attorne because he is tenant of the land The assignee of tenant by possession shal â—attorn 25 Tenant in taile after possibility of issue extinct shall not be compelled to attorne for the inheritance which was once in him Co. ibid. 316. a 4. but his assignée shall be compelled to attorne because then that priviledge is lost the assignée having in him onely a bare estate for life Release of quarrels is release of Act. 26 Quaerela being derived à quaerendo properly concerneth personal actions or mixt at the highest Co. ibid. 292. a. 3. for the Plaintiff in them is called Quaerens and yet if a man release all quarrels it is as beneficial as all actions for by it all actions both real and personal are released because by the release of all quarrels all causes of actions are released albeit no action be then depending for the same Where the estate is defeasible the tenant is not compelâ—able to attorn 27 It is a general rule that when the grant by fine is defeasible Co. ibid. 318. a. 4. 36 H. 6. 24. there the tenant shall not be compelled to attorne As if an infant being seised of a reversion levie a fine thereof this is defeasible by writ of error during his minority and therefore in this case the tenant shall not be compelled to attorne so likewise if before the Statutes of 4 H. 7. 24. and 32 H. 8. 36. a tenant in taile had levied a fine the tenant could not have béen
alive he should have gone quit by the acquittal of A. because he could not be a Receiver of a felon when A. was no felon And remoto impedimento c. Vide plus ubi supra 21 Things are construed according to that which was the cause thereof Vide 31. 9. Tenant by courtesie 1 If the King give lands to a man and a woman and to the heires of their two bodies and the woman die without issue Co. Inst pars 1 21. b. 4. 9 H. 3. Dower 202. yet shall the man be tenant in taile after possibility c. But if the King give land with a woman of his kindred in frank-mariage and the woman die without issue the man in the Kings case shall not hold it for his life because the woman was the only cause of the gift but otherwise it is in the case of a common person Frankmariage 2 If lands be given to a man and a woman in special taile Co. ibid. 7 H. 4. 16. a. and they are divorced Causa praecontractus both shall hold the lands for their lives a 13 E. 3. Tit. Ass 19 E 3. Ass 83. 12. Ass 22. 19 Ass 2. But in case of frankmariage if they be so divorced the woman shall enjoy the whole land because she was the cause of the gift So if lands holden in c Plowd Carzibs case soccage be given in special tail and the Donées die the issue being within the age of 14 yeares e 17 H. 3. Gard. 146. 27 E. 3. 29. Co. ibid. 29. b. 3 Co. ibid. 42. a. 4 the next of kinne of the part of the father or of the part of the mother which can hap the custodie shall have it but in case of frank-mariage the heire of the part of the mother shall have it because she was the cause of the gift as aforesaid Co. ibidem 88. a. 4. Formedon 3 If a woman tenant in general tail maketh a feoffment in fée and taketh backe an estate in fée and take an husband and hath issue and dieth the issue may in a Formedon recover the land against the father because he is to recover by force of the estate taile as heire to his mother and is not in that case inheritable to his father the estate tail being the cause and ground of his title An Office 4 A man may have an estate for life determinable at will 3 E. 4. 8. b. as if the King doth grant an office to one at will and also grant a rent to him for the exercise of his office for terme of life this is determinable upon the determination of the office which occasioned the grant of the rent 19. 59. Co. ibid. 85. a. 2 5 If a man make a Lease for yeares of a villeine this cannot be done without déed neither can the Lessée assigne it over without déed Grant of a Villain by deed because it is derived out of a fréehold that lyeth in grant which indéed is the material cause of the grant but a wardship is an original chattel during the minority derived out of no fréehold and therefore as the Law createth without déed so may it also be assigned over without déed Co. ibi 102. a 4 9 E. 2. execut 249. 6 Vpon a judgement in debt Judgement execution the Plaintiffe shall not have execution but onely of that land which the defendant had at the time of the judgement because the action was brought in respect of the person and not in respect of the land But if an action of debt be brought against the heire and he alieneth hanging the writ yet shall the land which he had at the time of the Original purchased be charged for that the action was brought against the heire in respect of the land Co. bid 102. b. 1. 22 Ass Pl. 32. 7 If a man be nonsuit the land onely Amerciament Issues of Jurors which he had at the time of the amerciament assessed shall be charged and not that which he had at the finding of the pledges for the amerciament is not in respect of the land but for his want of prosecution which was a default in his person But the issues of a Iuror shall be levied upon the feoffee albeit they were not lost before the feoffment because he was returned and sworn in respect of the land 8 A tenure of the King in Capite Tenure in gross is said to be a tenure of the King a Bract. f. 87 as of his Crown that is as he is King c Co. ibid. 108 a. 4. ubi Vide praedict Author And therefâ—râ— if one holdeth land of a common person in grosse as of his person and not of any Mannor c. and this Seigniory escheateth to the King yea though it be by attainder of treason he holdeth of the pâ—rson of the King but not in Capite because the original tenure was not created by the King Vide infra M. 25. ca. 10. Co. ibid. 158. a. 3. 15 H. 7. 9. 14 H. 7. 31. 18 E. 4. 3. 9 If the cause of challenge alleaged by the Plaintiff against the Sheriff be pâ—rtiality to either party Challenge and processe be once awarded for such partiality though there be a new Sheriff yet processe shall never be awarded to him but to the Coroners and therefore in that case the entry is Ita quòd Vicecomes se non intromittat But if the cause of Challenge be for that the Sheriff was tenant to either party or the like in that case the processe shall be directed to the new Sheriff and not to the Coroners Co. ibid. 161. a. 2. 44 E. 3. 20. 6 R. 2. Refc 11 11 H. 7. 4. 21 H 7. 40. 34 H. 6. 18. 16 E. 4. 10. Co. l. 9. fol. 22. Case of Avowry Co. ibid. 169. b. 2. 15 H. 7. 14. 29 Ass 23. 29 E. 3. 9. b. 10 If the Lord come to distreine cattle Distress which he séeth then within his fée and the tenant or any other to prevent the Lord to distreine driâ—es the cattle out of the Lords fée into some other pâ—ace not within his fée yet may the Lord freshly follow and distreine the cattle and the tenant cannot make rescous But if the Lord comming to distreine had no view of the cattle within his fée though the â—enant drive them off purposely or if the câ—ttle of themselâ—es after the view goe out of the fée or if the tenant after the view remove them for any other cause then to prevent the Lord of his distresse then cannot the Lord distrein them out of his fée and if he doth the tenant may make rescous 11 If there be thrée Coparceners and they make partition Rent in Coparcenary and one of them grant 20 s. per annum out of her part to her two sisters and their heires for egaltie of partition the grantées are not joynt-tenants of this rent but
of Attorney to the Lessor to make Livery and the Lessor maketh Livery accordingly notwithstanding the Lessor shall enter for the forfeiture because the Lessor for life had a Frank-tenement in him whereupon the Livery might work but if Lessée for yeares make a feoffment in fée and a Letter of Attorney to the Lessor to make Livery and he make Livery accordingly this Livery shall bind the Lessor and shall not be avoided by him for the Lessor cannot in this case make Livery as Attorney to the Lessée because the Lessée had no Freehold whereof to make Livery but all the Fréehold was in the Lessor Dyer 5. b. 1. 26 H. 8. 27 A man seised of devisable land before the Statute of Uses Rent devisable makes a Lease for yeares rendring rent and deviseth that rent to a stranger and dies and the stranger is seised of the rent and dies In this case the executors and not the heire of the devisée shall have the rent because the rent was but a Chattel in the devisée Dyer 90. b. 8. 1 Mar. 28 If there be Lessor and Lessée Trees sold by the Lessor and the Lessor sells all his trées growing in such a close Here nothing passeth to the Vendée for albeit the Lessor hath a general property in them yet the special property thereof is in the Lessée because the wood and trees are parcel of the Lease who shall by force of his Lease have the shade and fruit thereof as also the branches and loppings for fuel and mending of fences And therefore if the Lessor fell trees without the licence or will of the Lessee a good action of trespasse lyeth for the Lessée against him So likewise in 5 H. 4. 59. the heire in Chivalry being in ward fells trées in the land in ward and the Guardian brings trespasse against him and he pleads the special matter in barre Sed non allocatnr per curiam c. 25 Things are construed according to that which was the beginning of them Vide Max. 63. 21. Priviledge of tenant by the courtesie 1 Tenants after possibility of issue extinct Co. Inst pars 1 28. a. 2. although upon the matter he be but a Tenant for life yet hath he 8 priviledges incident to his estate which the Law alloweth not to a bare Tenant for life in respect of the inheritance which was once in him which priviledges you may see Co. In. part 1. 28. a. 2. The like 2 If a woman Tenant in taile general taketh an husband and hath issue which issue dieth and the wife dieth also without any other issue Co. ibid. 30. a. 1 there albeit the estate in tail be determined yet shall the hushand be Tenant by the Curtesie because he was intitled to be Tenant per Legem Angliae at first upon having the issue before the estate in taile was spent And although in this case the estate be not consummate untill the death of the wife yet it hath such a beginning after issue had in the life of the wife as is respected in Law for divers purposes for 1 After issue had he shall do homage alone and is become Tenant to the Lord and the Avowry shall be made onely upon the husband in the life of the wife 2 If after issue a 34 E. 2. Cui in vita 13. 2 E. 2. Cui in vita 26. 10 E. 3. 12. Dyer 21. El. 3â—3 29 E. 3. 27. the husband maketh a feofment in fée and the wife dieth the feoffée shall hold it during the life of the husband and the heire of the wife shall not during his life recover it in a sur cui in vita for it could not be a forfeiture because the estate at the time of the feofment was an estate of tenancy by the Curtesie initiate and not consummate And it is adjudged in 29 E. 3. that the Tenant by the Curtesie cannot claime by a Devise and waive the estate of his tenancy by the Curtesie because saith the Book the Fréehold commenced in him before the Devise for terme of his life A Voyage Royal. 3 When the King makes Voyage Royal into Scotland to subdue the Scots Co. ibid. 71. a. 4. Littl. § 96. Co. ibid. 70. a. 1 Co. ibid. 108. a. 4. Vide infrà 10. c. M. 43. 12. Co. ibid. 164. a. 4. c Bracton l. 1. 66. Britt cap. 71. Fleta l. 5. c. 9. 6. c. 47. the Law accompteth the beginning of the forty dayes to be after the King entreth into the forreigne Nation for then the Warre beginneth and till he come there he and his host are said to go towards the Warre and no military service is to be done till the King and his host come thither Tenure in Capite 4 If one holdeth land of a common person in grosse as of his person and not of any Mannor c. and this Seigniory escheateth to the King yea though it be by attainder of Treason he holdeth of the person of the King but not in Capite because the original tenure was not created by the King 3 E. 3. B. tenures 94. 30 H. 8. 43. 28 H. 8. B. livery 57 c. Descent in Capita stirpes 5 In case of Coparceners sometimes the descent is in Stirpes viz. to Stocks and Roots and sometimes in Capita to Heads As if a man hath issue two daughters and dieth this descent is in Capita viz. that each daughter shall inherit alike as Littleton saith Sect. 241. But if a man hath issue two daughters and the eldest daughter hath issue thrée daughters and the youngest but one daughter All those four shall inherit but the daughter of the youngest shall have as much as the thrée daughters of the eldest Ratione Stirpium in respect of their mothers estate from which theirs took beginning and not Ratione Capitum for in judgement of Law every daughter hath a seveaal Stock or Root So if a man hath issue two daughters and the eldest hath issue divers sonnes and divers daughters and the youngest hath issue divers daughters the eldest sonne of the eldest daughter shall onely inherit and all the daughters of the youngest for this also is not in Capita but in Stirpes and in this case the eldest sonne is Coparcener with the daughters of the youngest and shall have one moity viz. his mothers part So that men descending of daughters may be Coparceners as well as women and shall joyntly implead and be impleaded c. Vide 26. 2. Littl. § 2â—2 Co. ibid. 178. b. 2. 6 The Lands in Frank-mariage to be put into Hotchpot Frankmariage Hotchpot and the Lands in Fée simple which descend ought to move from one and the same person for if they moved from several Ancestors they cannot be put into Hotchpot c. Co. ibid. 187. a. 4. 39 H. 6. 45. 21 R. 2. judg 63. M. 33. E. 3. 7 If Lands be given to
Tenant for life A feofment by two and he in the Remainder or Reversion in Fée joyn in a Feofment by Déed the Livery of the Fréehold shall move from the Lessée and the Inheritance from him in the Reversion or Remainder from each of them according to his estate Co. Inst pars 1 303. b. 2. 5 Every man shall plead such pleas Pleas proper as are pertinent for him Secundum subjectam materiam viz. according to the quality of his case Estate or Interest as Disseisors Tenants Incumbents Ordinaries and the like Co. Inst pars 1 200. b. 3. 6 One Tenant in Common may enfeoffe his Companion Feofment Releases but not release because the Fréehold is several Ioyn-tenants may release but not enfeoffe because the Frée-hold is joynt But Coparceners may both enfeoffe and release because their seisiin to some intents is joynt and to some several Co. l. 3. 50. b. 4. Sir George Browns case 7 The words of the Statute of 11 H. 7. cap. 20. Statute of 11 H. 7. 20. interpreted for discontinuances which prohibits a Feme to alien the lands of her deceased husband are these that she shall not discontinue alien release or confirm them with Warranty where Warranty seems to be referred to any Discontinuance or Alienation as well as to release and confirmation So that if a Feme Tenant in special taile after the decease of her husband make a Lease for three lives not warranted by the Statute of the 32 H. 8. cap. 28. without Warranty he in the Reversion or Remainder by force of the said Statute of 11 H. 7. shall not enter but it was adjudged in Sir Geo. Brownes case in the 3 Report that in that case he might enter and that these words with Warranty shall be onely referred to Releases and Confirmations which indéed do not make a discontinuance without Warranty for the intent of the said Act of 11 H. 7. was not onely to prohibit every barre but also every manner of discontinuance which might put the heire to his real action whereby he might perhaps be disinherited or at least greatly delayed And therefore in regard Releases and Confirmations do not make discontinuance without Warranty these words with Warranty are to be construed Secundum subjectam materiam and shall be referred to them onely to make them equivalent to such an estate which passeth by Livery and which of it selfe without Warranty makes a discontinuance Co. l. 4. 10. b. 4. Bevils case 8 The Statute of 32 H. 8. cap. 2. which provides 32 H. 8. 2. interpreted for rents that none shal have any Avowry or Conusance for any rent suit or service unlesse seisin were had within 40 years before the Avowry made extends not to any such Rent or Service which by common possibility cannot happen or become due within 60 yeares as if the Seigniory consists upon Homage and Fealty onely for the Tenant may live 60 yeares after he hath done them So also if the Service be to cover the Hall of the Lord or to go to Warre with him when the King maketh Warre against his enemies such casual Services which by common possibility cannot happen within 60 yeares are not within that Act c. Likewise writs of Escheat Cessavit or Rescous are not within those branches of the same Statute which limit the seisin of land because in those writs the seisin is not traversable but the tenure and in those writs of Escheat and Cessavit albeit they demand the land yet néed they not alleadge any seisin in the same lands c. as the said Statute requires because that Act onely extends to such a writ where the Demandant or his Ancestors may have seisin of the land in demand within the time of limitation prescribed by the Act and the Statute doth not force them to any impossibility c. Scandalum Magnatum 9 The Lord Cromwell brings an Action de scandalo magnatum upon the Statute of 2 R. 2. cap. 5. against Vicar Delmy Co The Lord Cromwels case for speaking these words unto him You like of those that maintaine sedition against the Queens proceedings unto which the Defendant pleades special justification that the Plaintife procured two to prea h in his Church which enveighed in their Sermons against the Book of Common Prayer and because the Defendant did prohibit them the Plaintife said to the Defendant Thou art a false varlet I like not of thee to whom the Defendant said It is no marvel though you like not of me for you like of those inuuendo the two that should have preached that maintaine sedition innuendo seditiosam illam doctrinam against the Queenes proceedings And this was adjudged a good justification For in case of slander for words the sence of the words are to be taken and the sence of them doth best appeare by the cause and occasion of speaking them according to the Rule Sensus verborum ex causa dicendi accipiendus est sermones semper accipiendi sunt secundum subjectam materiam And therefore in this case the Council of the Defendant was said to have done well in shewing the special matter whereby the sence of this word sedition might appeare upon the coherence of all the words taken together viz. that the Defendant meant the seditious doctrine against the Quéens proceedings in the Act of 1 Eliz. by which the Book of Common Prayer was established and that he did not intend any such publique or violent Sedition as was alleadged by the Plaintife and as ex vi termini per se the word it selfe would import c. And it was said Quae ad unum finem loquuta sunt non debent ad alium detorqueri c. Common 10 If Common be said to be appertaining to a Mease Land Co. l. 4. 37. a. 4. 38. a. 3. Tirringhams case Meadow and Pasture time out of mind that shall be adjudged Common Appurtenant and not Common Appendant for it is against the nature of Common Appendant to be Appendant to Meadow or Pasture And therefore in that case the subject matter and the circumstance of the case ought to direct the Court to give Iudgement whether the Common be Appendant or Appurtenant 11 In Appeal of Murder against A. as principal Co. l. 4. 43. b. 4. Bibithes case and against B. as accessory before the fact Accessary in manslaughter A. was found guilty of Man-slaughter but not of Murder in this case B. was acquit because there cannot be an Accessary before the fact in Manslaughter which allwayes happens upon a suddaine debate or effray for if it be premeditate it is Murder Joint warranties or words 11 Ioynt words of the parties shall by construction of Law be taken respectively severally according to the several interests of the Grantées as Warranty made to two of certain lands Co. l. 5. 7. b. 4. 16 H. 6. 63 64. shall enure as
or other Writing shall be void yet the Law implicitly requires order which ought to be pursued by the Obligor c. As if an Obligation be made to the Sheriffe against the Statute of 23 H. 6. cap. 10. or to one against the Statute of Usury 13 Eliz. cap. 8. in those and the like cases the Defendant ought to conclude Judgement si Action and cannot plead non est factum 7 E. 4 5. 7 E. 6. Br. non est factum 14. against the opinion of Montague in Dyve and Maninghams case in the Commentaries Pl. com 66. Againe when the Obligation or other Writing took at first effect and was once revera his Deed but afterwards before the Action brought became no Déed as by rasure addition alteration breaking of the Seal or the like in these cases albeit it were sometimes his Déed yet may the Defendant safely plead non est factum for doubtlesse at the time of the plea which is in the present tenures it was not his Deed. In Dyer 36 H. 8. 59. In debt the Defendant pleades non est factum and before the day of Apparence of the Inquest the mice had eaten the Label unto which the Seal was fixed by the negligence of the Clerke in whose custodie it was kept whereupon the Iustices commanded the Iury that if they found that it was his Deed at the time of the plea pleaded they should then give a special Verdict which they did accordingly If an Obligation be delivered to another to the use of the Obligée and the Obligée refuseth it upon tender in this case the delivery hath lost its force and the Obligée can never agrée to it afterwards and then also the Obligor may safely plead non est factum against the opinion in Dyer 1 Eliz. 167. So also if an Obligation be made to a Feme Covert and the Baron disagrée to it the Obligor may plead non est factum for by the refusal the Obligation loseth its force and becomes no Déed And by these resolutions the Quaere in Dyer 2. Mar. 112. and the disagreeing opinions in 14 H. 8. 28. Dyve and Maninghams case 66. 1 H. 7. 15. Dyer 1 Eliz. 167. and other places are well reconciled 30 A. Tenant for life the remainder to B. in Fée joyn in a Lease to C. this immediately after the delivery takes effect in this manner Where a Lease enures by grant or confirmatioâ— it is the Lease of A. during his life Co. l. 6. 15. Treports case and the Confirmation of B. and after the death of A. it is the Lease of B. and the Confirmation of A. according to the opinion of Dyer Brown M. 6. and 7 Eliz. 234 235. and therefore in an Ejectione firma brought by C. if he count of a joynt Demise from A. and B. his count is not good And in that case although the Lease be by Déed indented yet shall it not worke any conclusion for when the Déed enures by passing of an interest as in this case it doth it shall not be taken for any conclusion no more than a Lease for yeares of the Tenant for life by Déed indented shall be an Estoppel after his death because at the beginning it took effect by way of passing an Interest Co. l. 6. 74. a. 3. Sir Drue Druries case 31 When Tenant by Knight Service dies his heire within age Marriage dâ— to the Lord. Chattel veâ—â— presently the value of his mariage as a Chattel takes such effect and is so vested in the Lord 24 E. 3. 25. V. N. Br. 27 E. 3. that albeit such an heire within age be made a Knight and to that purpose in Iudgement of Law is estéemed of the full age of 21 yeares yet shall the Lord have the value of his mariage as well as the custodie of his land till his age of 21 yeares which last to remove all doubt was expressely given to the Lord by Magna carta cap. 3. Co. l. 7. 17. b. 3. Calvins case 32 If a King hath a Kingdome by Title of descent where the Laws have taken good effect and rooting The King cannot altâ—â— in as much as by the Laws of that Kingdome he doth inherit it Lawes without Parliament he cannot change those Lawes of himselfe without consent of Parliament So also if a King hath a Christian Kingdome by Conquest as King H. 2. had Ireland after King John had given unto them being under his obedience and subjection the Laws of England for the government of that Country no succéeding King could alter the same without Parliament A Recognisance chargeth a rent after release to the Terre-tenant 33 The Grantée of a rent charge issuing out of land acknowledgeth a Recognisance and afterwards releaseth to the Terre-tenant Co. l. 7. 38. b. 3. c. Lillingstons case the Conusée sueth Execution and extends the rent notwithstanding by the release it is extinguished for the Recognisance took effect to charge the rent before the extinguishment and therefore it shall be liable to the extent in whose hands soever it comes and as to the Conusée shall not be extinct A Chattel vested 34 If the King hath an Advowson in Fée which is void Fitz. 33. N.O. P.a. and during the avoidance the King grants away the Advowson in Fee the King shall not present to this avoidance But if the King hath an Advowson by reason of the temporalties of a Bishoprick which is void and during the avoidance the King restores to the Bishop the temporalties yet he shall present to the Advowson and not the Bishop for this avoidance because the presentation was a Chattel which vested in him before he restored the temporalties So if the heire sue Livery from the King and hath it yet the King shall present to the Advowson which voided during the time that the Advowson and land were in the Kings hand causa qua supra Likewise if a man be seised of an Advowson in Fee in grosse or appendant to a Mannor and the Advowson voides and he dies his Executors shall have the presentation and not the heire because it was a Chattel vested and severed from the Mannor neither shall the heire in taile have the presentation which falls in the life of the Tenant in tail but the Executors of the Tenant in tail c. The like 35 The Termor shall have the presentation Fitz. 34. b. N which happens during the terme albeit during the terme he present not to the Advowson So if a Vicarage happen to be void and before the Parson can present he is made a Bishop c. yet he shall present to that Vicarage because it was a Chatttel vested in him Where the Guardian shall not have ravishment 36 If the Guardian marry the heire after the age of 14 yeares Fitz. 142. h. and after the heire is taken by a stranger yet the Guardian shall not have a Writ of
Will is determined though the Lord cometh in above the lease for life or for years the custodie or any other particular interest or tenancy at will yet shall he be compelled to make admittance according to the surrender And so it was holden in the Earl of Arundels case in 17 Eliz. See more of this Co. l. 4. in the Copihold cases Tâ—in 1. Jac. Inter Shepland and Ridler in Repl. in Co. Ba. the case of Guardian in soccage adjudged Co. ib. 76. b. 1. 10 In many cases the heire shall be in ward The Lord that have Wardship though not dying seised albeit the Tenant died not seised c. nor in the Homage of the Lord As if the Tenant maketh a feoffment in fee upon condition and the Feoffor dieth after his death the condition is broken the heire within age entreth for the condition broken In this case the heire shall be in ward and yet the Feoffor had no estate or right in the land at the time of his death but onely a condition and which was broken after his decease but because the condition restoreth the Tenant to the land in nature of a descent for he shall be in by descent by the same reason shall it restore the Lord to the wardship c. Co. ib. 89. b. 4. 11 If a stranger entreth into the lands of the Infant within age of 14 years taketh the profits of the same A stranger Guardian is soccage accountable the Infant may charge him as Guardian in Soccage And this doth well agrée with the writ of accompt against a Guardian in soccage for the words be Idem B. praefato A. rationabilem compotum suum de exitibus pervenientibus de terris tenementis suis in N. quae tenentur in soccagio quorum custodiam Idem B. habuit dum praedicta A. infra aetatem fuit dicitur and true it is that in judgement of Law he had the custodie of the lands and is called Tutor alienus whereas the right Guardian in Soccage is called Tutor proprius Neither is it any plea for him to deny that he is prochein amy but he must answer to the taking of the profits as Littleton saith Sect. 124. Co. ibid. 108. a. 4. 12 If one holdeth land of a common person in grosse as of his person and not of any Mannor Tenure in Capite c. and this Seignory escheateth to the King yea though it be by attainder of Treason he holdeth of the person son of the King as he held before of the person of the Subject and not of the King in Capite because the originall tenure was not created by the King And therefore it is directly said that a tenure of the King in Capite is when the land is not holden of the King as of any Honour Castle Mannor c. But when the land is holden of the King as of his Crown Vide Dyer 44. 28. c. 30 H. 8. Mag. Car. cap. 31. 25. 4. Advowson appendant 13 An Advowson is appendant to the Mannor of Dale Co. ib. 122 a. 1. of which Mannor the Mannor of Sale is holden the Mannor of Sale is made parcel of the Mannor of Dale by way of Escheat In this case the Advowson is still onely appendant to the Mannor of Dale Common appendant 14 If Common appendant be claimed to a Mannor Co. ib. 122. a. 4. yet in rei veritate it is appendant to the Demesnes and not to the services and therefore if a tenancy escheat the Lord shâ—ll not increase his Common by reason of that An Assise for â—ent after disâ—eisin 15 If the Tenant rescue the Distresse Co. Inst pars 1. 160. b. 3. and after is disseised of the tenancy yet an assise lyeth against him for the Disseisin done of the rent by the Rescous c. Coparcenary â—n other â—ands 16 If one of the Parceners take Baron and die Co. ib. 174. b. 4. c. the Baron being Tenant by the Courtesie is compellable by a writ de partitione facienda to make partition and shall be joyntly impleaded with the other Coparcener for he doth continue the state of Coparcenary as the other Parcener doth c. So likewise if there be two Coparceners and one of them doth alien in fée the Alienée and the other Coparcener are Tenants in common and several writs of Praecipe shall be brought against them and yet the Parcener may have a writ of partition against the Alienée at the Common Law which is a stronger case than the case put of Tenant by the Courtesie The heire in Hotchpot 17 If the Donées in Frankmarriage die before the lands be put into Hotchpot with the other Coparcener Littl. §. 270. Co. ib. 178. a. the heire of the Donées may well do it Descent shall not take away entry 18 If a Dissesor make a lease to a man and to his heirs during the life of I. S. and the Lessée dieth Co. ib. 239. a. 3. living I. S. this shall not take away the entry of the Disseisée because he that died seised had but a Frée-hold and heirs in that case were added to prevent an occupant For an heire in that case shall not have his age c. as it was adjudged in Lambs case P. 16 Eliz. in Co. Ba. Right left after recovery 19 If the Disseisée disseise the heire of the Disseisor Co. ib. 266. a. 4. albeit the heire recover the land against the Disseisée yet shall he leave the proceeding right in the Disseisée So if a woman that hath right of Dower disseise the heire and he recover the land against her yet shall he leave the right of Dower in her Attornment 20 If either the Grantor or the Grantée of a Seigniory rent reversion Co. ib. 315. a. 4. remainder c. die before attornment the attornment is thereby countermanded But albeit the Tenant of the land die or grant over his estate to another yet may he that hath his estate either by descent or grant attorn at any time Wast mainâ—einable 21 Regularly when the reversion is devested Co. ib. 356. a. 4. the Lessor cannot have an action of Waste yet in some special cases an action of Waste shall lie albeit the Lessor had nothing in the reversion at the time of the Waste done As if Tenant for life make a feoffment in fée upon condition and Waste is done and after the Lessée re-enter for the condition broken In this case the Lessor shall have an action of Waste So likewise if Lessee for life be disseised and Waste is done the Lessée re-enters Here also an action of Waste shall be maintained against the Lessee c. 5. Co. ibid. 366. b. 3. 22 A warranty that commenceth by disseisin is properly Warranty that begins by disseisin when the disseisin is done immediately to the heire that
attornment Co. ib. 94. 2. he shall not shew it sic de simlibus But when he that claimes the thing or any right or interest out of it or justifies in right of the Grantée there he ought to shew the first grant as the second Grantée of a rent charge shall shew the first grant and so shall his Bailife and the Grantée of a rent charge shall not plead the release of the Disseisée to the Disseisor without shewing it for albeit he claime not the land of which the release is made yet he that hath rent out of land hath also right in the land which by a release of all his right shall be extinct and therefore in such case he ought to produce the Déed And with this agrées the 20 H. 7. 6. 14 H. 8. 5. The Disseisée shall not plead a release to the Disseiser neither of right in the land nor of rent issuing out of the land without shewing it for where one claims the thing unto which the release is made or right or interest out of it the Law creates a privity in respect of his estate or right in the land viz. to this intent that he shall not have benefit of the Déed without shewing it Impeachment â—f wast is gone â—y altering the â—â—tate 116 If an estate of land be granted without impeachment of wast Co. l. 11. 83. b. 3. Lewis Bowles case that priviledge is individually annexed unto that estate 3 E. 3. 44. per Shard and Stone If one that hath a particular estate without impeachment of wast change his estate he loseth that advantage 5 H. 5. 9. a. If a man make a Lease for years without impeachment of wast and after he confirmes the land to him for his life he shall be afterwards chargeable for wast 28 H. 8. Dyer 10. b. If a Lease be made to one pur auter vie without impeachment of wast the remainder to him for terme of his own life here he is punishable of wast for the first is estate drowned and gone and so it is also of a Confirmation The heir at the Common Law shall have prohibition of wast against the Tenant in Dower but if the heir grant over the reversion his Grantée shall not have prohibition of wast For it appears in the Register fol. 72 that such an Assignee in an action of wast against Tenant in Dower shall recite the Statute of Glocester and therefore he shall not have prohibition of wast at the Common Law for then he should not recite the Statute Vide F. N. B. 55. 14 H. 4. 3. 5 H. 7. 17. b. suprà 1 4. â—ouchee c. â—y have a â—rit of Erâ—â— c. 117 If a man be vouched and enter into warranty and leaseth F. N. B. 21. c. he may have a Writ of Error and shall assigne the errors which hapned between the Demandant and the Tenant or between the Demandant and himselfe as Vouchee And so he in reversion that prays to be received for default of the Tenant for life or for his faint pleading if he be recovered and plead and lose he shall have a Writ of Error and shall assigne the error that hapned betwéen the Demandant and Tenant or betwéen the Demandant and himselfe that so prayed to be received So also if Tenant for life lose by default he in the reversion shall have a Writ of Error albeit he neither was received nor prayed to be received And he shall assigne for error any matter that hapned betwéen the Demandant and Tenant that so lost by default And all this is in respect of the privity and interest which the Vouchee and Reversioner had in the land so recovered by the Iudgement F. N. B. 21. l. m. n. 118 In a plea of land against the Tenant if the Tenant die Who may bring writs 〈◊〉 Error he that is heir to the Tenant for that land shall have a Writ of Error and not he that is heir at the Common Law as in Borough English if the Tenant lose the land by erronious Iudgement the youngest sonne shall have the Writ of Error and so shall he that is heire in special tail And this in respect of the special privity and interest which they have in the land And for the same reason it is that in case land be lost by erronious Iudgement the Tenant may have a Writ of Error and so also may the Vouchee have another Writ of Error upon one and the same Iudgement and so may the Tenant and the Tenant by receit and all at one time hanging Executors also or Administrators shall have a Writ of Error upon a Iudgement given against their Testator for debt or damages So likewise the heir shall have a Writ of Error to reverse an out-lawry of Felony pronounced against his father to restore him to the privity of bloud betwéen his father and him F.N.B. a. 22. b. The Successor of an Abbot Prior Parson or such like bodies politique shall have a Writ of Error upon a Iudgement given against their Predecessor of all things which touch the Succession or Corporation but if a man recover against a Parson Bishop or the like debt or damages by judgement or action personal their Executors shall have a Writ of Error upon such Iudgement and not their Successors because their Executors or Administrators have interest in such things and not the Corporation c. If a man sue execution erroniously against the recongnisor upon a recognisance the Feoffée of the recognisor shall have a Writ of Error c. F. N. B. 22. c. 119 In a praecipe quod reddat of land if the Tenant disclaime No writ of Eâ—ror upon diâ—claime whereby the Demandant recovers in that case the Tenant shall not have a Writ of Error against his own Disclaimer because by that plea he hath waved all the privity and interest that he had in the land but if the Tenant onely plead non-non-tenure and thereupon it is found against him so that the Demandant recovers in that case the Tenant shall have a writ of Error c. F.N.B. 98. q. r. 120 If a man lose land by default in a praecipe quod reddat and die Heir and â—â—cutor privies the heir shall have an action of deceit as well as the father and shall have restitution for he is privy in bloud So likewise if a man have execution by default upon a recognisance in a Scire facias sued against one and that Defendant die his Executors shall have a Writ of deceit and shall be restored for they are privies in right c. F.N.B. 108. a. 121 The Vouchée or Tenant by receit or he in the reversion Reversione shall have â—taint or Eâ—â— where he joyns to the Tenant for terme of life by aid prayer shall have an attaint if they lose by false verdict And if the Tenant for life lose by false verdict he in the
the Law 27 Eliz. Co. l. 3. 13. Sir Will. Herberts case 11 H. 7. 12. b. 2 Vpon a recognizance acknowledged by the Ancestor Equal interests require â—qual contriâ—â—tions or a judgement in an action of Debt given against him If he die seised of two acres whereof one is holden in Borough English or having issue two daughters which make partition or if he die without issue whereby part of his land descendeth to the heir of his fathers part and part to the heire on the part of his mother In all these cases if one onely be charged he shall have contribution against the other for they are in aequali jure Finch 20. Co. l. 2. 25. b. 4. The case of Banker 26 Ass Pl. 37. 3 If two four or more men being severally seised of lands Equal extenâ— joyn in a recognizance all their land must be equally extended Finch 20. Finch ibid. 4 This Rule doth chiefly shine and shew forth it self in the exposition of Statutes Exposition of Statutes by extending things there provided to mischiefs in the like degrées c. Finch ibid. 5 This Rule is also of great use for guiding the grounds and maximes of things which newly start up Grounds of Law according to the rule of the Common Law 23 H. 8. Fitz. 6 Vses at the Common Law were nothing Uses regardâ—â— as estates yet in time gaining greater regard to be imputed amongst Inheritances are now demeaned as other Inheritances at the Common Law so as possessio fratris shall be of them of lands in Borough English the use shall descend to the youngest son And now also these uses being turned into estates shall be demeaned in all respects as estates in possession Finch 20. 7 When custome createth Inheritance in Copy-hold lands Copihold 〈◊〉 Freehold and maketh the lands descendable Co. l. 4. 22. then shall the Law direct the descents according to the Maximes and rules of the Common Law to have a possessio fratris and the like But not to collateral things as tenancy by the Courtesie Dower descent to toll an entry Finch 20. Co. Inst pars 1 24. b. 1. 8 Equitie is a construction made by the Iudges Equity a coâ—struction mâ—â—â— by the Judges that cases out of the letter of a Statute yet being within the same mischief or cause of making the same shall be within the same remedie that the Statute provideth And the reason hereof is for that the Law-maker could not possibly set down all cases in expresse terms Aequitas est convenientia rerum quae cuncta coaequiparat quae in paribus rationibus paria jura desiderat And again Aequitas est perfecta quaedam ratio quae jus scriptum interpretatur emendat nulla scriptura comprehensa sed solum in vera ratione consistens Aequitas est quasi aequalitas Bonus judex secundum aequum bonum judicat Co. ib. 24. a. 4. aequitatem stricto juri praefert Et jus respicit aequitatem And therefore the cases set down in the Statute of Westm 2. are there put onely for examples of estates taile general and special and not to exclude other estates taile For Exempla illustrant non restringunt legem And this appears by the words of the same Stat. Auxi sont divers autres estates en le taile c. And herewith also agreed Littleton § 21. Carbonels case 33 Ed. 3. Taile 5. 3. E. â— 32. 18 Ass Pl. 5. 18 E. 3. 46. 1 Ma. Dy. 46. The Lord Barkleys case Pl. Co. 251. Co. ib. 53. b. 3. 9 Albeit the Statute of Glocester Wast and â—â—struction coâ—vertible which provideth remedy against wast speaketh not of the exile of Villeins yet that also is comprehended under the general word of waste so that exile or destruction of Villeins or Tenants at will or making them poor where they were rich when the tenant came in whereby they depart from their tenures is to be adjudged waste for waste and destruction in their larger sense are words convertible c. â—ivery of â—nds in ward 10 A livery of lands out of the Kings hands is in the nature of a restitution which is to be taken favourably Co. ib. 77. a. 4 For if livery be made of a Mannor cum pertinentiis the heir shall thereby have an Advowson appendant Howbeit it is otherwise in grants by Letters Patents 11 By the Statute of 2 E. 6. cap. 8. it is enacted Co. ib. 77. b. 2. That such persons as hold for term of years â—tatute Merâ—hant Staple â—legit c. â—ithin 2 E. 6. 8. or by copie of Court-roll or have any rent common or profit apprender out of any lands found in any office whereby the King is entitled to the wardship of the same lands or to the forfeiture of lands upon attainder of treason felony praemunire or any other offence may have hold enjoy and perceive their several estates interests and profits although they be not found in the office Here albeit those two estates onely are saved by the letter of the said Act yet it being a beneficial Law the estate of Tenant by Statute Staple Merchant Elegit and of Executors that hold lands for payment of debts c. are taken to be within the benefit of that clause which was doubted in 14 El. Dyer 319. â—ncertain teâ—ure found â— E. 6. 8. 12 Where an office is found by these words or the like quod de quo Co. ib. 77. b. 3. vel de quibus tenementa praedicta tenentur juratores praedicti ignorant or that the lands are holden of the King sed per quae servitia juratores ignorant neither of these shall be taken for an immediate tenure of the King in chief but in such cases a melius inquirendum shall be awarded as hath béen accustomed of old time And this provision is made by the Statute of 2 E. 6. cap. 8. And here albeit that Statute saith no more yet by the equity of the same Statute if the first office find a tenure for the King per quae servitia c. and upon the Melius the tenure is found for a Subject In that case the first office hath lost his force and need not to be traversed and the Melius is in the nature of a Diem clausit extremum or a Mandamus c. And this was but a declaration of the ancient Common Law as by these words of the same Statute as hath been accustomed of old c. it appeareth but if upon the Melius it be found again as uncertainly as before is said then it is in judgement of Law a tenure in Capite Howbeit if upon the Melius a tenure be found for the King Ut de manerio c. sed per quae servitia c. it shall be taken for Knight-service â—arons and Knights fees 13 At or before the Statute of Magna carta cap. 2. Co.
K. Bench sits 10 At the Common Law the Court of Marshalsie had jurisdiction of Pleas of the Crown and had a general authority in effect Co. l. 10. 71. a. 73. b. in the case of the Marshalsie as Iustices in Eire had for they were in part the Vicegerents of the Chiefe Justice of England within the Vierge Howbeit after that by the Statute of 28 E. 1. cap. 5. the Iustices of the Kings Bench were enjoyned to follow the Court the general authority of that Court as to those purposes vanished because they being onely the Vicegerents of the Chief Justice in his presence their authority ought to cease for in presentia majoris cessat potestas minoris c An entaile extinct in a Fee-simple 11 Sir Thomas Wyat being seised of divers Mannors in taile Dyer 115. 65 66. 1 2 P. M. the remainder in H. 8. in fee in the beginning of Quéen Maries reign forfeits them for treason whereby they escheat to the Quéen In this case the estate tail was utterly extinct and the Quéen is in of her ancient Fée-simple executed for she cannot be in of the Fée-simple determinable upon the entaile because then there would be two Fee-simples in the Qu which is absurd And therefore rather than so the entaile shall be merged in the Quéens ancient Fée-simple Errour 12 An Exigent is returnable by the roll Octabis Mich. but the writ of Exigent was returnable Mense Dyer 211. 32. 4 Eliz. and the Defendant was out-lawed betwixt Octabis and Mense and this was adjudged error because the roll is of more credit than the writ and determines it 62 The more worthy thing draweth unto it things of lesse worthinesse Finch 23. 1 The body of a man is more worthy than land The bodie more worthy than land therefore land shall follow the nature of the person as a Villein shall make frée land to be Villein-land but Villein-land shall not make a frée man to be a Villein So likewise the Kings land which he hath in his natural capacity Co. Inst pars 1. 15. b. 3. shall be demeaned according to the priviledge and prerogatives of his body royal As if the King hath issue a sonne and a daughter by one Venter and a son by another Venter and purchaseth lands and dieth and the eldest son enters and dies without issue the daughter shall not inherit those lands nor any other Fée-simple lands of the Crown but the younger brother shall have them Where note that neither possessio fratris doth hold of lands which are the possessions belonging to the Crown neither yet doth Half-bloud make any impediment to the descent of lands of the Crown as it fell out in experience after the decease of E. 6. to Quéen Mary and from Quéen Mary to Quéen Eliz. both which were of the halfe blood and yet inherited not onely the lands which King Edward and Quéen Mary purchased but also the ancient lands parcel of the Crown A man that is King by descent on the part of his mother purchaseth lands to him and his heirs and dies without issue this land shall descend to the heir of the part of the mother whereas in the case of a Subject the heire of the part of the father shall have them So King Henry the eighth purchased lands to him and his heirs having issue two daughters Quéen Mary and Quéen Eliz. and after the decease of E. 6. the eldest daughter Quéen Mary did inherit onely all the lands in Fée-simple for the eldest daughter or sister of a King shall inherit all his Fée-simple lands So it is also if the King purchaseth lands of the custome of Gavelkind and die having issue divers sons the eldest son shall onely inherit those lands And the reason of all these cases is as afore is said for that the quality of the person doth in these and many other like cases alter the descent so as all the lands and possessions whereof the King is seised in jure Coronae shall secundum jus Coronae attend upon and follow the Crown And therefore to whomsoever the Crown descends those lands and possessions shall descend also For the Crown and the lands whereof the King is seised in jure Coronae are Concomitantia And the lands and possessions belonging to the Crown do follow and attend upon the Crown as upon the more worthy c. Co. ib. 43. a. 4. 2 When the Royal body politique of the King doth méet with the natural capacity in one person The King no minor the whole body shall have the quality of the Royal politique which is the greater and more worthy For Omne majus trahit ad se quod minus est And therefore in judgement of Law the King Co. ib. 16. a. 1. as King cannot be said to be a Minor because in the Royal body politique there can be no minority So likewise if the right heire of the Crown be attainted of Treason yet shall the Crown descend to him and eo instante without any other reversal the attainder is utterly avoided as it fell out in the case of H. 7. c. Co. ib. 87. b. 3. 3 If a man be seised of a Rent-charge Rent-seck Things in grant follow land Common of pâ—sture or such like inheritance which do not lie in tenure and dieth his heire being within the age of 24 years In this case the heire may choose his Guardian but if he hold lands in soccage together with such like inheritances Then shall the Guardian in soccage not onely take into his hand the lands holden in soccage but such inheritances also because he hath the custodie of the heir c. Co. ib. 114. b. 2. 4 Albeit a man cannot prescribe to have bona catalla proditorum Of felons goods no perscription faelonum c. yet may they or the like priviledges be had obliquely or by a meane by prescription For a County Palatine may be claimed by prescription and by reason thereof to have bona catalla Proditorum felonum c. â—he grant of a â—annor pasâ—eth services 〈◊〉 5 Whatsoever passeth by livery of seisin either in déed or in Law Co. ib. 121. b. 2 may passe without déed and not onely the rents and services parcel of the Mannor shall with the demesnes as the more principal and worthy passe by livery without déed but likewise all other things regardant appendant and appertinent to the Mannor as incidents and adjuncts to the same shall together with the Mannor passe without déed and all these shall so passe without saying cum appertinentiis Priviledges â—â—nct 6 If A. be seised of a Mannor Co. ib. 121. b. 4. whereunto the franchise of waife and stray and the like are appendant and the King purchaseth the Mannor with the appurtenances Now are these Royal franchises remitted to the Crown and not any longer appendant to the Mannor c. Common
1. 173. b. 4. that shall avoid the partition in the whole be it of a Mannor that is intire or of acres of ground or the like that are several for the partition in that Case implyeth for this purpose both a Warrantie and a Condition in Law and either of them is intire and giveth an entry in this Case to the whole Co. l. 4. 1. 12. Bustards Case And so it was resolved in Bustards Case Co. l. 4. 121. both in the Case of exchange and partition â—eerage in copercinencie 77 If an Earldome Baronie Co. Inst pars 1. 156. a. 3. or other Peerage descend to Coparteners the Lands shall be divided as amongst other Parteners but the dignitie being intire cannot be parted neither shall it descend to the eldest alone but in such Case the King who is the soveraigne of honor and dignitie may conferre it upon which of the Coheries he please A County intire 78 A writ of Dower is brought against the Alienée of the Baron Co. lib. 9. 17. b. 2. in Anus Benigfields Case and he voucheth the heire In this Case the Demandant may testise that the heire hath Lands descended unto him in the same County for to another County the originall doth not extend and may pray that he may be endowed of his Estate So in 4 E. 4. 36. 6 E. 3. 11. The Tenant in a writ of Dower vouched the heire of the Baron and the Demandant testifieth that he hath Lands by descent c. in the same County and judgement was given against the heire But if he had none there it should have béen given against the Tenant Vide suprà 55. 110. An intire condition 79 If there be an obligation with Condition Dier 16. 88. 28 H. 8. that if I infeoffe another before such a Feast of the Mannor of Dale discharged of all manner of Rents In this Case if a stranger hath a Rent issuing out of the said Mannor and I make a Feoffment and at another day afterwards and before the Feast I purchase a release of the stranger here the Condition is not observed in as much as the Mannor ought to have bin discharged at the time of the Feoffment simul semel because the Condition was intire But if the Condition be that I pay 10. l. build an house and goe of your errand to Pauls before such a Feast In such Case I may well doe these Acts upon several dayes before the Feast because the Condition was not intire â—ease to two 80 If a Lease be made to two for lives terme of their Dier 67. a 18. 3 E. 6. and they make partition and the one dies his part shall revert to the Lessor because their lives are several the life of the one not being the life of the other But in a Lease be made to two for term of yeares with proviso that if the Lessées die within the term that then the term shall cease and they make partition or out of them aliens his part and dies In this Case the Lessor cannot enter into his part that dies but the grantee or the executors of the Lessée if he made an alienation shall have his part during the life of the Survivor because the terme of yeares is intire and cannot cease as to one and continue to the other â—stresse 81 An Honor is intire as well as a County or Mannor and therefore a distresse taken in the County of Wilts in a place which is parcel of the Honor of Wallingford the Castel and Court whereof is within the County of Berk was driven to that Castel and there impouded and upon a replevin delivered since the Statute of 1 2. P. M. 12. Dier 168. 20. 1 El. and held good For afterwards at the suit of the Defendant the Plaint was removed by an Accedas ad Curiam directed to the Sheriffe of Oxon and the Plaintife counted of the taking in praedicto loco in Com. Wilts and all held good per Curiam Dier 227. 44. 6 El. 82 A general pardon discharged all post fines under 6 l. And for the fine there were two writs of Covenant Post-fine but onely one concord of Lands in two Counties and the Post-fine being extracted intirely did exceed 6 l. but being divided it was under which division Sank-ford requested but the Concord being intire the Court adjudged the Post-fine but one also Dier 246. 70. 8 El. 83 In a Replegiare against a Bishop and others Challenge they were at several issues but one venire facias was awarded the Bishop challengeth the Array because there was no Knight and this challenge was held good for all because the venire facias was intire albeit the issues were several Dier 256. 11. 9 El. 84 Tenant for life surrenders the one Moitie Intire reservation and the Lessor grants the whole Land to a stranger Habendum the one Moitie for life and the other for 40 yeares after the death of the Tenant for life rendring 40 l. per annum In this Case the Lessor may distraine and a vow for the whole Rent presently albeit the one Moitie be but terra revertens and the reason is for that the reservation is intire Dier 260. 22. 9 El. 85 In Debt upon a lease for yeares of several parcels Non demisit pleaded the parties are at issue upon non dimisit and it was found a demise of all but one parcel and damages assessed Howbeit the Plaintife could not have judgement because the Lease and Count were intire and did containe all Hob. 66. Cox and Jenner 86 Where two commit Trespass Trespass a release to one of them of all actions real and personal enures to both albeit he to whom the release is made is not party to the suit but is onely mentioned in the declaration with a simul tum c. because the Trespass is intire and therefore cannot be released to one but must also be released to all that are guilty thereof Vide Hob. 70 Parkens Case Ho. 180. Slowley and Sveley 87 Where a man hath a personal Action against two Defendants Trespass if they plead severally and he be non-suite against the one before he hath judgement against the other he shall be barred against both for the Trespas being intire the non-suite worketh in nature of a release of the whole 71 Argumentum à Divisione est fortissimum in Lege Co. Inst p. 1. 213. b. 3. 1 An example or two of this Argument you shall find in Littleton An impaâ—â—â— Rent whereof the first is in Sect. 344. where he puts this Case If a man enfeoffe another upon Condition that he and his heires shall render unto a stranger and his heires an annuall Rent of 20 s. c. and upon failer of payment that the Feoffor and his heires may enter this is a good Condition yet the summe so reserved cannot be
man-slaughter ought to Insue upon a suddaine debate of effray because if it be premeditate it is murder 16 A Feme sole deviseth land to A. and his heirs A femes will revoked by taking Barâ—â— if A. survive him Co. lib. 4. 16. b. 2. in Ferse Hemblings Case they inter-marry the Feme revokes and often saith during the Coverture that A. shall not have it and dies whereupon the heir of the Feme enters And in this Case it was resolved that the making of a Will is but the inception of it and that it taketh not any effect until the death of the Devisor for Omne testamentum morte consummatum est voluntas est ambulatoria usque extremum vitae exitum And therefore it would be against the nature of a will to be so absolute that the party which made it being of sane and perfect memory might not have power to counter-mand it and then this taking of Baron being the Femes proper act shall be accounted a counter-mand in Law of the will and thereupon the heir of the Feme recovered the Land c. Payment to a termeâ— no seisin of rent 17 A man deviseth a rent for life out of the Mannor of Dale Co. lib. 6. 57. a. 4. in Bredimans Case and deviseth the Mannor for years the termor enters and payes the Rent after the Term ended the Devisée brings an Assise against the Tetretenant And in this Case it was resolved per totam Curiam that the payment of the rent by the termor was not seisin to binde the Terre-tenant after the determination of the Term in respect of the weakness and meannesse of the interest of the tenant for years who at the common Law could not prejudice nor draw in question the estate of the frank-tenement c. Common ratione commorantiae not good 18 In Trespass the defendant justifies Co. lib. 6. 60. a. 3. in Gatewards Case that all Inhabitants in any antient Messuage within the Town of Dale have used to have Common in the place c. in Solo ratione commorantiae And it was adjudged per totam Curiam that this Custome was against Law for divers reasons amongst which this was one that such a claim of a Common is against the nature and quality of a Common for every Common may he suspended or extinguished but such a Common as that shall be so incident to the person that no certain person shall be able to extinguish it for so soon as he which releaseth c. removes the new Inhabitant shall have it again 71. 3. Allegiance not local 19 In Calvins Case the plea of the Defendants that confined the ligeance of the Plaintiffe Calvin to the Kingdome of Scotland onely Co. l. 7. 9. b. 2. Calvins case Infra ligeantiam Regis Regni sui Scotiae extra ligeantiam Regis Regni sui Angliae and so did make one local ligeance for the natural subjects of England and another local ligeance for the natural subjects of Scotland was adjudged utterly unsufficient because ligeance being a quality of the mind that follows the subject whithersoever he goeth it is against the nature thereof to be local or confined within any one particular Kingdome or Countrey And therefore it is truly said Qui abjurat regnum amittit regnum sed non regem amittit patriam sed non patrem patriae for notwithstanding the abjuration he oweth the King his ligeance and still remaineth within the Kings protection because the King if he please may pardon him and restore him to his Countrey again c. â—eisin of rent â—aversable 20 There is a diversity Co. lib. 9. 33. a. 3. in Backnals Case when the Lord in his Avowrie varies from the truth of the quality of the services by colour of seisin and possession which he hath got of his tenant and when he varies from the truth of the quantity of the services by reason of seisin which he hath got of more then he ought to have of the same nature for where the Lord avowes because the tenant holds of him certain land by fealty rent and suit of Court and alledges seisin of all and for the rent arrear c. whereas the true tenure was by fealty and rent onely In this case the seisin of the suit is not material because it is of another quality and nature and the tenancy originally was not charged with any service of such a quality as suit of Court And therefore in such case the tenure is traversable But where the rent is 2 s. per annum if the Lord hath happed quiet and voluntary seisin of more rent then he ought to have as of 3 s. c. without any cohertion of distresse there because the tenancy is charged with service of such nature and quality and for that it is not to be presumed that the tenant would willingly pay more rent then he ought the seisin is traversable and not the tenure c. Co. Inst p. 1. 117. a. 2. 21 If a man be Lessée of a Villain for life for years or at will Lessee Villain and the Villain purchase lands in fée if the Lessée entreth into the Lands he shall hold the Lands as a Perquisite to him and his heirs for ever for the Law respected the quality and not the quantity of his Estate c. 22 A tenant holdeth of his Lord certain Lands in socâ—age Relief to pay yearly a pair of guilt Spurs â—o ib. 90. b. 4. or five shillings in money aâ— the Feast of Easter In this Case the rent is uncertain and the tenant may pay which of them he will at the said Feast and likewise the tenant may pay which of them he will for relief but if he pay it not when he ought then may the Lord distrain for which of them he will Howbeit if the tenure be to attend on his Lord at the Feast of Christmas or to pay ten shillings there the relief must be ten shillings because it is against the nature of the other to be doubled Co. ib. 207. a. 2 23 If an Obligation of 100 l. be made for the payment of 50 l. at a day and at the day the Obligor tender it Payment of money or wheat Diversity yet in an Action of Debt upon the Obligation if the Defendant plead the tender and refusal he must also plead that he is yet ready to pay the money and tender the same in Court But if a man be bound in 200 quarters of wheat for the delivery of 100 quarters and the Obligor tender at the day the 100 quarters c. he shall not in such case pleaâ— uncore prist because although it be parcel of the Condition yet they being bona peritura if will be a charge for the Obligor to kéep them and therefore in such case he is not bound to say he is alwayes ready to pay the same 100 quarters c.
Condition that he shall kill J. S. the bond is void So if a man make a feofment upon Condition that the Feoffée shall kill I. S. the Estate is absolute and the Condition void so as he who intends any unlawful Act is still by the Law crost in the designe or purpose he aimes at Dier 28. a 16. 31 H. 8. 7 Vice is so odious in the eie of the Law Bloud corrupt that it will not suffer any to inherit who derives his title through bloud tainted with any Capital offence As if a man hath issue two Sonnes and the eldest in the life of the Father is attainted for felony and dies living the Father and after the Father dies seised of the land in Fée this land shall discend to the younger Sonne as heire to his Father if the eldest Sonne hath no issue living but if he hath issue in life who by the Law should inherit the Land if it were not for the Attainder and albeit he hath committed no offence yet the land shall not discend to him nor yet to the younger Brother but shall escheate to the Lord of the Fée 140 Interest Reipublicae ne maleficia remaneant impunita â—â—feit inâ—â— no good 〈◊〉 1 Where an Indictment is found insufficient Co. l. 4. 45. a. 1 in Vaux his Case the offender may be indicted again for in such Case Autre fois acquite or convict is no good plea because that plea is allowed upon that Maxime of the Common Law viz. that the life of a man shall not be put in jeopardy twice for one and the same offence Howbeit this is intended upon a lawfull acquital or Condition for otherwise his life was never put in jeopardy but when the Indictment or other procéeding against him are insufficient he may be re-indicted For the Law doth abhorre that great offences should passe un-punished according to these ancient Maximes of the Law and State Maleficia non debent remanere impunita impunitus continuum affectum tribuit delinquendo minatur innocentes qui parcit nocentibus Howbeit if upon an insufficient Indictment of felony a man hath had judgment quod suspendatur collum and so is attainted which is the judgment and end that the Law hath appointed for felony in this Case he shall not be again indicted and arraigned until that judgment be reversed by Error 〈◊〉 it goods 〈◊〉 2 The Reason why bona waviata viz. Co l. 5. 109. a. 4 in Fauxleys Case such shelme goods as a felon in flying waives or leaves behind him are forfeit to the King and that the owner shall in such Case lose his property in them is because of the negligence and default in the owner for that he made not fresh suit to apprehend the felon for Interest Reipublicae ne maleficia remaneant impunita impunitas semper ad deteriora invitat And therefore the Law hath imposed this penalty upon the owner that if the felon by his industry and fresh suit be not taken by such default he shall lose all his goods which the felon so leaves behind him â—â—â—es taken intendâ—â— 3 In many Cases Penal Statutes shall be taken by intendment Co. l. 11. 44. b. in Alexander Pollers Case and not according to the expresse words thereof especially when it is to remedy a mischiefe in advancement of Iustice and for the suppressim of Crimes and heinous offences of which sée many examples in the book at large quoted in the margent â—ption 4 In a writ of Reception F. N. B. 72. h. where after Replevin the party distraines again for that same thing the Sheriffe is comanded to apprehend the party so offending and so to chastise him by amerciament quod castigatio illa in casu consimili timorem aliis praebeat delinquendi 〈◊〉 breaâ—â— 5 A man was put into the Stockes upon suspition of Felony Dier 99. a. 60. 1 Max. and another comes who lets him go at large this is felony at the Common Law de frangend prison albeit the party that escaped be not indicted for felony â—â—lt â—â—â—der 6 In Banco Reg. in the Case of one Tripcony the Iury to the Nisi prius gave the Plaintiffe but 40 l. damages for the cutting of his right hand Dier 105. a 4. 1 2 P.M. and they were increased by the Iustices to 100 l. because this was matter apparent to the Court and the offence and trespass therein was caried about with the person howbeit in the Case of Sir John Bonham against the Lo. Sturton for slander where the damages were 500 Marks the Iustices said they could not lessen them Dyer 211. 33. 4 Eliz. 7 By the better opinion albeit the Statutes of 27 H. 8. 4. 28. H. 8. 15. Admiral be penal and ordaine that Commissions to heare and determine piracies shall be awarded to the Admiral and others to be named by the Chancellor yet the Lord Keeper being no Chancellor may grant such Commissions and that for the necessity to punish such offences 141 It favoureth Justice and right Co. Inst p. 1. 33. a. 1. 1 In a writ of Dower brought against the heire tout temps prist is a good plea before demand to barre the woman of the meane values and damages because the heire holdeth by title Plea in dowâ— and doth no wrong till a demand be made It is otherwise in a writ of Ayd Cosinage c. where the land and damages are to be recovered for there such a plea is not good because in that Case the Tenant of the land hath no title but holdeth the land by wrong Co. ib. 103. a. 4 b. 1. 2 If there be Lord and Tenant by Homage Ancestrel Homage ancestrel contiâ—nued and the Tenant alien the land in Fée although it be but upon a Condition which is performed at the day yet is the tenure gone for ever because the privity and Estate being once discontinued it is for ever after extinct But if the land be recovered against the Tenant upon a faint title and the Tenant recover the same again in an Action of an higher nature there the Homage Ancestrel remaines for the right which is favoureth in Law was a sufficient meane for the continuance thereof so it is also if he had reversed it in a writ of Error Co. Inst p. 1. 143. a. 4. 3 Before the Statute of quia emptores terrarum if a man had made a feofment in Fée rendring Rent he might have distrained for the Rent arreare of Common Right and in Case he had made no reservation of Rent or service yet the Feoffée should then have held of the Feoffor by such services as the feoffor held over of the Lord paramount So as albeit the Feoffor were negligent and made no provision or reservation of Rent or service yet the Law it selfe so much regarded Equity and Iustice that it created a tenure where the party was
350. if he may enter he must enter and when he cannot enter he must make a claime for that a Freehold and Inheritance shall not cease without entry or claime And yet if Land be granted to a man for terme of five yeares upon condition that if he pay the Grantor within the first two yeares fourty pounds that then he shall have fee or otherwise but for the terme of five yeares and livery of seisin is made unto him by force of the Grant In this case if the Grantee pay not unto the Grantor fourty pounds within the first two yeares then immediately after the first two yeares the Fee and Frank-tenement shall be adjudged in the Grantor without entry because the Grantor cannot presently after the two yeares enter upon the Grantee Co. ibid. 21 a. 4. for that the Grantee hath yet a terme of three yeares in the Land and in as much as hee cannot enter hee shall not be driven to make any claime to the Reversion For seeing by construction of Law the Freehold and Inheritance if the Condition had beene performed was to passe Maintenant out of the Lessor by the like construction the Freehold and Inheritance by the default of the Lessee shall be revested in the Lessor without entry or claime There is the same Law of a Grant by Devise Lease and Release Bargaine and Sale by Deed indented and inrolled c. or whether it be of an Advowson Reversion Remainder Rent Condition or any other thing that lyes in Grant Feme recovered without Baron 53. The Husband is the Wives head Co. ibid. 352. b. 4. Litt. S. 668. and regularly shee can do nothing without him and yet in an action of Waste if the Baron make default to the great Distresse the Feme upon prayer shall be received and shall shew the whole matter and how shee is in her Remitter and shall barre the Lessor of his Action And albeit this priviledge be given the Feme by Westm 2. cap. 3. yet ancient Authors who wrote before that Statute do speake of such a kinde of receipt at the Common Law for otherwise the Feme would be without remedy Judgement upon a dead â—an 54. It seemes irregular Co. ibid. 390. b. 4. that Iudgement should be given upon a man already dead And yet in 8 Ed. 3. Judgement 225. the Defendant in an appeale of death did wage Battell and was slaine in the Feild yet Iudgement was afterwards given that he should be hanged and the Iustices sayd such Iudgement was necessary because otherwise the Lord could not have a Writ of Escheate and so would be without remedy Co ibid. 393. a. 4. 55. Regularly Two Recoveries upon one warranty there cannot be two recoveries in value upon one warranty and yet in some speciall cases rather then a man shall be without remedy there shall be two such recoveries for if a disseisor give lands to the Husband and Wife and to the heires of the Husband the Husband alieneth in fee with warranty and dyeth the Wife bringeth a Cui in vita the Tenant voucheth and recovereth in value if after the death of the Wife the Disseisee bring a Precipe against the Alienee he shall vouch and recover in value againe Co. l. 8. 61. a. 3. in Beechers case 56. In all actions reall and personall No amerciament against the Plaintiff if part be found for the Demandant or Plaintiff and part against him or all or part against the one Tenant or Defendant and nothing or but part against the other the demandant or Plaintiff shall be amerced Howbeit in Trespasse of Battery against Baron and Feme supposing the battery to be done by them both and the Feme is onely found guilty c. and the Baron acquit yet in this case the Plaintiff shall not be amerced because the Plaintiff in such case can have no other Writ and therefore he shall be excused Vide Max. 149. 41. 57. Vide 143. 15. Dyer 8. a. 28. H. 8. Pl. 11. 16. 58. In a Writ of Ward the Writ supposeth that B. held the land c. Variance inter writ and count no error and the Count declareth that B. was but Cestuy que use so as the Feoffees held the land and not B. Here this variance is no Error because the Statute of 4 H. 7. which gives the wardship of Cestuy que use appoints no speciall Writ for it and therefore the generall Writ and speciall Count suffiseth for otherwise the Lord should be without remedy which the Law will not permit So in a Warrantia Cartae the words of the Writ are Unde cartam habet and yet the Count may be upon warranty for Homage Ancestrel Dyer 56. 17. 35 H. 8. 59. A Writ of Right Quia Dominus remisit Curia Feme Covert c. was brought by Baron and Feme the Feme being under age the Feme appeares by Procheine amie who was admitted by the Court and upon the Tenants voucher and default of the Vouchee shee had judgement finall c. without her Husbands appearing in the action Vide supra 10. Dyer 206. 11. 3 4. Eliz. 60. A man makes a Lease for yeares to begin at a day to come Waste and before the day the reversion is granted over divers times afterwards the Termor enters and makes waste and the fourth Assignee bring waste and counts of the assignment and tenure of each of them to whom the Land came after the Lease albeit there was no tenure before the commencement of the Lease and it was held good and so it is also in the Regester Hob. 3. Pincombes case 61. Albeit regularly a warranty ought onely to be annexed to a freehold and not to any lower estate Warranty is a covenant yet when the breach or impeaching is not of a Freehold but of a chattell Viz. of a Lease for yeares for which there can neither be Voucher Rebutter nor Warrantia Cartae an action of Covenant may be grounded upon such a Warranty As if A. demiseth the Monnor of D. to B. for one and thirty yeares and afterwards grants it to C. in possession for life with warranty against him and his Ancestors C. may bring an action of Covenant upon that Warranty and shall recover damages thereupon See the Book at large Hob. 48. Coxes case 62. Lands in Ancient demesne where the possession is stirred Ancient demesne cannot be recovered but within their owne Franchise or Iurisdiction and this is regularly true yet actions at the Common Law upon which no remedy can be had in ancient demesne do lye in the Kings Court though they stir the possession as in a Quare impedit 7 H. 6. 35. because they cannot write to the Bishop And the reason is because the Common Law being as ancient as their priviledge is will not endure that by pretence of Priviledges there should be a Failer of Originall Right as that
False plea in Dower 2. In a Writ of Dower Co. ibid. 33. a. 1. if the Tenant being in by discent plead a false Plea he shall answer all the damages from the time of the Husbands death albeit for some part of that time he enjoyed not the Land nor received any profit thereof As it appeares in a notable Record between Belfeild and Rowle Mich. 8 9. Eliz. Rot. 904. in Com. Ba. In which Suite the Tenant as to parcell pleads non tenure and for the residue detainer of Charters upon which Pleas they were at Issue and both Issues found by the Iury against the Tenant and found further that the Husband dyed seised such a day and yeare and had Issue a Son and that the Demandant and the Son for six yeares after the decease of the Husband together took the profits of the Land and after the Son such a day and yeare dyed without Issue after whose decease the Land discended to the Tenant as Vncle and Heire to him by force whereof he entred and took the profits untill the purchasing of the Originall Writ and found the value of the Land by the yeare and assessed damages for the detaining of the Dower and costs of Suit upon which Verdict after much debating the Demandant had Iudgement to recover her damages for all the time from the death of her Husband without any defalcation And this was cheifely caused by his false Plea whereas he might have avoyded the answering of the damages for the six yeares if he had truly pleaded according to the truth of his case Assignment of Dower by a wrong-doer voidable 3. If assignment of Dower be made by any Disseisor Abator Co. ibid. 35. â— 2. in Bredi mans case Co. l. 6. 58. a. 1. Intrudor or any wrong doer in Lands and Tenements if they came to that estate by collusion and covin between the Widow and them albeit the Widow hath just cause of Action and the Assignment be indifferently made after Iudgement by the Sheriff of an equall third part yet shall the Disseisee c. avoid it for covin in this case shall suffocate the right that â—â—pertained to her and so the wrongfull manner shall avoid the matter that is lawfull See Pl. Co. 51. a. Rent-charge extinct by covin 4. If a man grant a Rent-charge out of two acres Co. ibid. 148. b. 3. and after the Grantee recovereth one of the Acres against the Grantor by a title Paramont the whole rent shall issue out of the other Acre but if the Recovery be by a faint title by Covin then the rent is extinct for the whole because he claimeth under the Grantor Forfeiture 5. If Tenant for life plead covinously Co. Inst pars 1. 252. a. 1. to the disherison of him in the Reversion this is a Forfeiture upon Record Avowry Stat. 11 H. 8. 19. 6. The Stat. of 21 H. 8. 19. which gives to the Lord Avowry upon the lands without naming any person certain being made to suppress fraud Co. ibid. 268. b. 2. in the case of Avowry Co. l. 9. 22. a. shall be taken with equity And therefore where the words of the Statute be If the Lord distraine upon the Lands and Tenements holden yet if the Lord come to distrain and the Tenant chase away his Beasts which were within view out of the Land holden and there the Lord distraine Albeit the Distresse be in that case taken out of his fee and Seigniory yet it is within the said Statute for in Iudgement of Law the Distress is lawfull and as taken within his fee and Seigniory because that Statute being made to prevent fraud and covin admits an equitable interpretation as aforesaid So it is also if his Bayliff do it tamen quaere de hoc but for Damage-feasant the Distresse must be taken upon the Land c. Attaint 7. Perjury which is a falsehood or fraud in a high degree is greivously punished by the common Law Co. ibid. 294. b. 2. And therefore in an Attaint which is a Writ that lyeth where a false Verdict in Court of Record upon an Issue joyned by the parties is given if the petty Iury be attainted of a false oath they are stained with perjury and infamous for ever for the Iudgement at the common Law importeth 8 greivous punishments 1. Quod amittat liberam legem imperpetuum viz. that they shall be infamous for ever and never be received to be a witness or of a Iury 2. Ferisfaciant omnia bona catalla sua 3. Terrae tenementa in manus domini Regis capiantur 4. Uxores liberi extra domos suas ejicerentur 5. Domus suae prostrentur 6. Arbores suae extirpentur 7. Prata sua urentur 8. Corpora sua carceri mancipentur And the Law esteemed perjury in this kind the more odious and afflicteth the greater punishment thereupon because the tryalls of all Actions reall personall and mixt depend upon the oath of twelve men and prudent Antiquity inflicted a strange and severe punishment upon them if they were attainted of falsehood and perjury ut poena ad paucos metus ad omnes perveniat for there is miserecordia puniens and there is also crudelitas paucens But this punishment is altered by the Statute of 23 H. 8. cap. 3. Co. ibid. b. 3. 8. The Statute of 23 H. 8. cap. 3. made to prevent perjury and false Verdicts shall be taken with equity for 1. where the Statute saith Attaint Stat. 23 H. 8. 3. that the party greived shall have an Attaint against the party who shall have Iudgement upon the Verdict yet the Attaint shall be maintained upon that Statute against the Executors of that party Howbeit it must be between party and party 2. In the Kings Bench or Common Pleas 3. Consider what Pleas may be pleaded in an Attaint by force of that Statute and what not Litt. S. 675. 9. If a man let Land to a Feme for life A false Recovery and afterwards one sues a feined and false Action against the Feme and recovers the Land against her by default so as the Feme may have a Quod ei deforceat according to the Statute of West 2. cap. 4. The Law gives so much respect to a Recovery Co. ibid. 356. a. 4. 362. a. 1. Co. l. 1. 15. b. 3. that it workes a Discontinuance so as the Reversioner shall not have an Action of Waste c. Howbeit if Tenant for life suffer a common Recovery or any other Recovery by covin and consent between the Tenant for life and the Recoveror this is a Forfeiture of his estate and he in the Reversion may presently enter for the Forfeiture See the Statute of 14 Eliz. cap. 8. concerning this matter and Co. l. 1. 15. Sir William Pethams case l. 3. 60. c. Litt. S. 678. 10. If the Baron discontinue the Land of the Feme Covin
lessee that he shall not be impeached of waste the lessee may plead this in barr of the action of waste without bringing his action of Covenant Finch ibid. 5 Vpon the grant of a ward with warranty the defendant in a writ of right of ward may rebut the plaintif by that warranty and shall not be driven to bring an action of Covenant upon the grant to avoid circuit of action Finch fo 14. Fr. Edi. 6 One that hath rent issuing out of land disseiseth the terre-tenant Recouper in an Assise by the disseisee the disseisor shall recoup the rent in the damages and the reason is for avoiding circuit of action for otherwise when the disseisee re-enters the action for the arrerages of rent shall be received but Circuitus est evitandus boni Iudicis est lites dirimere ne lis ex lite oriatur Vide Co. l. 5. 31. a. 2. in Coulters case 180 Matter of Vexation And therefore Co. Inst part 1. 127. a. 1. 1 If the demandant or plaintif be non sute Plaintif amerced or judgement given against him he shall be amerced pro falso clamore for vexing and troubling the tenant or defendant without just cause Co. l. 5. 73. b. The case of Orphans 2 If any Orphan of London Oâ—phans which by the custom of that City is under the government of the Maior and Aldermen there sue in the Ecclesiastical Court or in the Court of Requests c. for any goods money or chattels due unto them either by the custom of London or by any devise or legacy in the will of their Ancestor or to have accompt c. In such case a prohibition lyeth because the government of the Orphans of London belongs to the Maior and Aldermen of that City and they have Iurisdiction of them And per Popham if the Lord of a Manor hath probate of testaments within his Manor if any will prove such a will in the Ecclesiastical Court a prohibition lies because the jurisdiction thereof belongs to another And the reason of this is for that otherwise the party might have double vexation and trouble Iudgement drowns a â—oâ—d 3 Where a man hath judgement upon an Obligation Co. l. 6 45. a. 3. Higgens case he shall not afterwards bring an action of debt upon the same obligation against the same party not only because the judgement hath drowned the bond by changing it into a matter of record but likewise for that if he that so recovers might have another new action and another new judgment he might also by consequent have infinite actions and infinite judgements to the perpetual vexation and charge of the defendant and infinitum in lege reprobatur Co. ibid. 46. a. 2. And therefore if a man brings an action of debt upon an Obligation and is barred by the judgement as he so long as that judgement stands in force cannot have a new action Pari ratione when he hath judgement in an action upon the same Obligation so long as that judgement stands in force he shall not have a new action Sure in two Courâ—s 4 If any use the Countenance of Law which was instituted to prevent Co. l. 8. 60. a. 3. in Beechers case and make an end of controversies and vexation for double vexation he shall be fined As if a man sue in the Common pleas and afterwards for the same cause sue the defendant in London or any other Court the plaintif shall be fined for this unjust vexation 9 H. 6. 55. 14 H. 7. 7. And in a Recaption the plaintif shall recover damages and the defendant shall be fined and imprisoned for his double vexation Vide F. N. B. 71. f. m. infra 181. 7. 5 In good discretion no melius inquirendum shall be awarded after office found against the King without view of some Record Co. l. 8. 169. a. 4. in Paris Stroughters case or some other pregnant matter for the King to avoid further vexation of the subject And therefore where upon a Diem clausit extremum it was found that the land was held of the Quéen Dyer 292. pl. 71. 12 Eliz. sed per quae servitia Iuratores ignorant and thereupon a melius inquirendum awarded whereby the tenure was found of a subject and all other points certainly found In this case the first office was adjudged void by the sence of 2 3 E. 6. and the rather because it should give no further occasion of vexing the subject for that the usual course was upon a double Ignoramus to adjudge a tenure for the King in Capite 181 Pendente Lite nihil innovetur Quarâ— Impedâ—t 1 At the Common Law Co. Inst part 1. 344. b. 3. if hanging a Quare Impedit against the Ordinary for refusing the Patrons Clerk and before the Church were full the Patron had brought a Quare Impedit against the Bishop and hanging the sute the Bishop had admitted and instituted a Clerk at the presentation of another In this case if judgement were given for the Patron against the Bishop the Patron might have had a writ to the Bishop and removed the Incumbent that came in pendente lite by usurpation for pendente lite nihil innovetur And therefore at the Common Law it was good policy to bring the Quare Impedit against the Bishop as spéedily as might be Co. l. 115. b. Foliambs case F.N.B. 60 a. 2 In Real actions depending as Formedon dum fuit infra aetatem Estrepment writ of right or the like the demandant shall have a writ of Estrepment to inhibit the tenant from committing waste or estrepment hanging the sute the like writ also may be had after judgement and before execution Vide the Statute of Glocester 6 E. 1. cap. 13. It lyeth also in an action of waste and the words of the writ are Tibi praecipimus quod ad messuagium praed personaliter accedens totaliter ordinari facias quod vastum seu estrepamentum de eodem messuagio contra formam Statuti praedict non fait pendente placito praed indiscusso Co. l. 6. 29. b. 3. 3 In Dyer 339. 17 Eliz. A presentation obtained of the Queen Presentation hanging a Quare Impedit in deceit of the Queen was adjudged void In Greens case F. N. B. 20. c. 4 In a writ of Error after errors assigned and scire facias awarded against the defendant upon such assignment Error the plaintif shall not assign any error in fact as to allege that the plaintif in the other action was dead at the time of the judgement or before the judgement or the like And when the plaintif may assign errors in fact he shall assign but one error of that kind but he may assign as many errors as appear in the record because this shall be tried by the Iustices in Court but that by a Iury which innovation will much delay and prejudice
cases agitur civiliter and not criminaliter and verba accipienda sunt in mitiori sensu Also the Innuendo will not serve when the words themselves are not slanderous Co. l. 6. 6. a. Sir Iohn Molyns case 5 E. 3. is Lord the Abbot of Westm Mesne Tenure and C. tenant of the Manor of D. the tenant is attainted of treason and office thereof found E. 3. grants the Manor to Sir Iohn Molyns and his heirs Tenendum de nobis haeredibus successoribus nostris et aliis capitalibus dominis feodi illius per servitia inde debita de Iure consueta In this case the question was of whom and how this Manor was holden And here albeit it was objected that the Tenendum being by the services inde thence due at which time nothing was due to the Mesne the Mesnalty continued still extinct and therefore that it was holden immediately of the King yet it was adjudged that by those words of the Patent the Mesnalty was revived for when those words may be interpreted two manner of wayes viz. either immediately of the King or mediately by the Mesne reason requires that the words should be understood in the milder sence especially when that appears to be the Kings intention and tends more to his honour and it is not reasonable that the Mesne who offended not should lose his tenure Co. l 6. 6. b. Wheelers case 6 H. 8 grants land Tenure Tenendum de nobis et haeredibus nostris per servitium unius Rosae Rubeae Annuatim ad festum Nativitatis Sancti Iohannis Baptistae solummodo pro omnibus omnimodis aliis servitiis And this was adjudged tenure in soccage in Chief and not tenure in Capite by Knightservice for albeit it was objected that the patentée could not hold onely by the Rose because homage or at least fealty was incident to every tenure and therefore that the King was deceived in his grant yet it was resolved that for as much as fealty is incident to every rent service the Law annexeth fealty to the rent and these words viz. Pro omnibus aliis servitiis are to be understood of other services which the Law doth not imply or add to it so as the tenure shall be by a Rose and fealty and this is the benign construction of Law as near the Kings intention as may be by which construction the said words pro omnibus aliis servitiis have some effect and shall not be rejected as vain and of no force Co. l. 6. 66. b. Sir Moyle Finches case 7 When a Manor hath once had the reputation of a name Name in reputation by which it hath been commonly known albeit the demesnes be afterwards severed from it so as it ceaseth to be a Manor yet in grants fines or other amicable conveyances it may pass still by the name of a Manor but not in Adversary writs c. so if I have a Park by the license and grant of the King and by the name of a Park it is commonly known and after I surrender my patent to the King by which in Law it remains no longer a Park yet it having once obtained the name of a Park in truth it is a good ground for the reputation and continuance of the name of a Park afterwards and by that name may pass in conveyances And all this by a favourable construction of Law c. Remainder vests 8 If land be granted to A. for life the remainder to B. for life Pl. Co. 32. a. 2. in Colthrist Beinshâ—ns case and if B. die living A. that then it shall remain to C for life In this case this word then shall not be intended presently during the life of A. as these words prima facie do seem to import but they shall have a beneficial construction viz. that then it shall remain as a remainder ought to doe that is to say to vest then and to be executed after the death of A. So if a gift in tail be made upon condition that if he doe such an act that then the land shall remain to his right heirs this word then is not so to be understood as if it should avoid the estate tail and to be executed presently upon the act performed but it is to be intended that upon the act performed the remainder shall vest and after the estate ended shall be executed and not before 189. Construeth things according to Common possibility or intendment And therefore Judges 1 Regularly Iudges ought to adjudge according to common intendment of Law Co. Inst part 1. 78. b. 1. Parson 2 By intendment of Law every Parson or Rector of a Church is supposed to be resident on his benefice unlesse the contrary be proved Vide 2 3. Manor 3 By common intendment one part of a Manor shall not be of another nature than the rest A Will. 4 By common intendment a Will shall not be supposed to be made by collusion BonuÌ„ Vicinus Possibilia 5 In facto quod se habet ad bonum malum magis de bono quam de malo lex intendit Lex intendit vicinum vicini facta scire Nulla impossibilia aut inhonesta sunt praesumenda vera autem et honesta et possibilia Guardian Ward 6 Lex semper intendit quod convenit rationi As in this case the Guardian shall have the custody of the land until the heir come to his full age of one and twenty years because by intendment of Law the heir is not able to do Knight service before that age which is grounded upon apparent reason Iurors 7 By the Common Law in a plea real mixt or personal Co. ibid. 157. a. 1. 158. b. 2. there ought to be 4. of the Hundred where the cause of action ariseth returned for their better notice of the cause for vicini vicinorum facta praesumuntur scire Howbeit by the Statute of 27 Eliz. 6. In a plea personal if two Hundreders appear it suffiseth And in an Attaint albeit the Iury is double yet the Hundreders are not double Fee-simple 8 When a man is said to be seised in fee without more Co. ibid. 189. a. 2. Littl. §. 293. it shall be intended in fee simple and it shall not be intended by this word in fee that a man is seised in fee tail unless this addition be put to it fee tail for fée shall be taken secundum excellentiam for the highest and best fee and that is fee simple Verdict 9 If a verdict find that a man hath duas partes Manerii Co. ibid. 190. b. 3. c. in tres partes divisas this shall not be intended to be in common but if the verdict be in tres partes dividendas then it séems that they are tenants in Common by the Intendment of the verdict Co. ibid. 226. a. 1. 10 The Lord by escheat albeit his
and yet it may be that he was not his heir for it is not expresly said that he is his son and heir but that he entred as son and heir and yet in regard he pleads by way of barr the best shall be intended for the defendant In like manner in 27 Ass pl. 31. Tit. Barr 303. Br Assise 272. In an assise brought by the heir the tenant saith that the father of the plaintif being tenant by the Curtesie and yet in life let his estate to the ancestor of the tenant wâ—o died seised of that estate after whose death the tenant was in as son and heir and demands Iudgement si Assise c. And this was held a good barr And yet he saith not that he was the first that entred after the death of his Father and if he were not the first he hath no title for the land in such case Occupanti conceditur viz. to him that first enters and that might be the plaintif but yet the barr was held good because to a common intent it shall be taken that the tenant was the first that entred after the death of the father and if it were not so the plaintif may and ought to shew it Vide plus ibid. infra 195. 27. Capias pro fine 41 If a man be condemned in trespass F.N.B. 121. 1. or in debt upon an obligation where he denies his déed at the sute of the party and after he is taken by Capias pro fine within the year at the Kings sute and committed to the Gaol if the Gaoler suffer him to escape the party shall have an action of debt for this condemnation against the Gaoler and yet he was not committed to him at his sute but at the sute of the King Howbeit the Kings sute shall serve the party in this case because the King was entituled to the fine by the party but it is otherwise after the year for then it will be intended that the party hath accorded with him that was condemned And therefore after the year he shall be put to sue a Scire facias upon that Iudgement Vide Max. 63. pl. 4. Executor Heir Assets 42 In debt against an Executor the plaintif néed not count Co. l. 9. 94. a 3. in Will. Banes case that the executor hath assets for it will be intended prima facie that he hath assets So likewise in debt against the heir the plaintif shall never averr in his Count that he hath assets for the Law presumes it prima facie because the Law presumes that the testator or ancestor will not leave a greater charge upon the executors or heir than he leaves benefit to discharge it Perpetuities 43 In the Argument against perpetuities in Corbets case Co. l. 1. 87. b. 4. in Corbets case it was said by Glanvile Iustice that betwixt the making of the Statute of 13 E. 1. de donis and the Statute of 27 H. 8. of Uses such a proviso annexed to an estate tail that it should cease as if the tenant in tail were dead was never séen or heard of and therefore he concluded that it could not be done by Law Little f. 23. And so likewise concludes Littleton in the like case that if any action might have been brought upon the Statute of Merton cap. 6. De dominis qui maritaverint illos c. si parentes conquerentur c. it shall be intended that at some time or other it would have béen put in ure And therefore he saith that no action can be brought upon that Statute in as much as it was never seen or heard that any action was ever taken thereupon Attaint 44 By intendment of Law a verdict is true Dyer 212. 34. 4 El. and therefore the Law will admit of no new proof to defeat it for albeit where the defendants in an attaint give new matter in evidence to enforce the first verdict as they may the plaintif shall be admitted to disprove it yet the plaintif shall never be suffered to produce any new matter in evidence nor inforce the first by other matter afterwards discovered Devise Tenure 45 A man intitles himself as devisee of the whole land by the Statute of the 32 H. 8. of wills and albeit he shewed not the tenure Dyer 329. 16. 16 Eliz. it was ajudged well enough for that it ought to come on the other part and prima facie it shall be intended Socage because most part of the land is so holden 190 Stabit praesumptio donec probetur in Contrarium Co. Inst pâ—rs 1. 222. b. 3. 34 Ass pl. 1. 1 If an agréement be made between two Condition that the one shall enfeoff the other upon condition in surety of the payment of certain money and after the livery is made to him and his heirs generally the estate is bolden by some to be upon condition for that the intent of the parties did not appear to be changed but to continue at the time of the livery Co. ibid. 227. b. 1 Dyer 81. 2 An issue found by verdict shall alwayes be intended true Attaint until it be reversed by Attaint and for that reason upon an Attaint no supersedeas is grantable by Law Plow 49. b. Co. ibid. 310. b. 4. 3 If a man plead a feoffment of a Manor Attornment he need not plead an Attornment of the tenants for it will be intended that the tenants did attorn But if it be material it must be denied or pleaded of the other side Co. ibid. 361. a. 3. 4 The issue of tenant in tail may falsifie a recovery had against tenant in tail by default nihil dicit confession or demurrer Falsifying of a recovery but if the recovery passed upon an issue tried by verdict he shall never falsifie in the point tried because an attaint might be had against the Iurors and albeit all the Iurors be dead so as the attaint do fail yet the issue in tail shall not falsifie in the point tried because until it be lawfully avoided pro veritate accipitur As if the tenant in tail be impleaded in a Formedon and he traverseth the gift and it is tried against him and thereupon the demandant recovers In this case the issue in tail shall not falsifie in the point tried but he may falsifie the recovery by any other matter as that the tenant in tail might have pleaded a collateral warranty Littl. §. 688. or a release as Littl. putteth the case or to confess and avoid the point tried Co. l. 4. 71. â— 4. Hyndes case 5 A. seised of land in fee demiseth to B. for years Fine Deed inrolled and after by déed indented before Easter Term in 29 Eliz. bargains and sells the land to C. and the same Term levies a fine to C. and his heirs and afterwards in the same Term also the deed is inrolled A. commits waste for which C. brings his
§. 209. as if a Lord of a manor will prescribe that every Tenant who matieth his daughter to any man without the Lords licence shall make fine This prescription is void being against reason because none shall make such fines but only villeins for a freeman may fréely mary his daughter to whom he pleaseth And albeit that it hath been objected by some that such a custom may have a lawful beginning because Littl. in the beginning of the chapter of villeinage § 174. alloweth that a freeman may take lands of the Lord to be holden of him viz. to pay a fine for the mariage of his son or daughter and therefore some have thought that such a custom generally with in the manor might be good but the answer is that although it may be soln a particular Case upon such a special reservation of such a fine upon a gift of land yet to claim such a fine by a general custom within the manor is against the fréedom of a freeman that is not bound thereunto by particular tenure howbeit a custom may be alleged within a manor that every tenant albeit his person be free that holdeth by bondage or native tenure the freehold being in the Lord shall pay to the Lord for the mariage of his daughter without licence a fine And this is termed Marchet of two french words Mariage and achecter to buy Co. ibid. 140. a 4. b. 1. Littl. §. 210. 6 The custom of Gavelkind in Kent where all the sons inherit equally Gavelkind hath been alwayes allowed a good custom because every son is as well a gentleman as the eldest and having means may attain to as great honor and preferment as the eldest which by want and penurie may be obstructed according to that of Horace Haud facile emergunt quorum virtutibus obstat Res angusta domi Co. ibid. 140. b. 3. Littl. §. 211. The like custom is used and allowed as reasonable in other parts of England within divers manors and seigniories although it be not called Gavelkind in any Country but Kent And as it is said of sons so likewise by custom when one brother dieth without issue all the other brethren may inherit There is also another custom allowed within divers manors called Borough-English Borough-English where the youngest son or youngest brother inherits and in the manor of B. in Berkshire where the sisters shall not be Parceners but the eldest sister shall have the inheritance all which do hold good because consonant to reason Co. inst pars 1. 141. a. 3. 7 Malus usus abolendus est and every usage is evill Malus usus that is against reason Quia in Consuetudinibus non diuturnitas temporis sed soliditas rationis est consideranda And by this rule at the Parliament holden at Kilkenny in Ireland Lionel Duke of Clarence being then Lieutenant of that Realm the Irish custom called there the Brehon-law was wholy abolished for that as the Parliament said it was no law but a lewd custom et malus usus abolendus est as is said before Co. ibid. 155. a. 2. 8 Albeit the writ of Assise be that the Sheriff Assise Faceret duodecim liberos et legales homines de vicineto c. videre tenementum c. Yet by antient course the Sheriff must return 24. and this is for expedition of justice for if 12. should only be returned no man should have a full Iury appear or be sworn in respect of challenges without a Tales which would be a great delay of trials so as in this case usage and antient course maketh a Law Co. l. 2. 17. a. 4. in Lanes case 9 Severance of the frank-tenement and inheritance of land holden by copy of Court-Roll Copyhold doth not extinguish or determine the Copy-hold estate for albeit his estate is taken to be but an estate at Will yet the custom hath so established the estate of the Copyholder that he is not removeable at the Will of the Lord so long as he performs the customs and services And by the same reason the Lord cannot determine his interest by any Act that he can do and so hath it been oftentimes adjudged in the Kings Bench. Co. l. 4. 21. a. 3. in Browns case 10 Albeit a Copyholder hath in judgement of law but an estate at Will yet custom hath so established and fixed his estate Copyhold that it is by the custom of the manor descendable and his heirs shall inherit it And therefore his estate is not meerly ad voluntatem domini but ad voluntatem domini secundum consuetudinem manerii so as the custom of the manor is the very soul and life of Copyhold estates for without custom or if they break their custom they are subject to the Will of the Lord And by custom a Copyholder is as well inheritable to have his land according to the custom as he who hath a franktenement at the Common Law for Consuetudo in this case est altera lex and being an usage time out of mind may create and consolidate Inheritances Alienation presented 11 A Custom within a Manor Co. l. 5. 84 a. 3. in Penimans cas◠that every alienation of lands holden of the same Manor whether it be by writing or feoffment thereof made or by will shall be presented at the next Court holden for the said Manor in pain that upon failer of such presentment such alienation shall be void is a good and reasonable Custom But a Custom that none shall use his Common in such a place until the Lord enter with his beasts is void for the unreasonableness for if the Lord will not enter it is no reason that the Commoners should lose their Common Vide 2 H. 4. 24. Common of Shack. 12 Common called Shack which at the beginning was but in nature of a féeding together by reason of Vicinage for avoiding of sutes is in some places by Custom altered to the nature of Common appendant or appurtenant Co. l 7. 5. a. Sir Miles Corbets case and in some places it retains the original nature and the Rule to know it is the Custom and usage of every several Town or place for Consuetudo loci est observanda And therefore if in the Town of Dale one hath gotten divers parcels of land together in which the Inhabitants have used to have Shack and long since did enclose it and nevertheless alwayes after harvest the Inhabitants have had Shack there for their Cattel This shall be taken for Common appendant or appurtenant and the Owner cannot exclude them from Commoning there albeit he will not Common with them but hold his own lands so enclosed in severalty And this is well proved by the usage for notwithstanding the antient enclosure the Inhabitants have had Common there But if in the Town of Sale the Custom and usage have béen that every Owner in the same Town hath enclosed his own land