the arrearages of twenty pounds monthly before such seizure due or payable shall ensue or be continued against such Offender so long as the same person shall continue in coming to Divine Service according to the intent of the said Estatute It was resolved by all the Judges Mich. 37 38 Eliz. That if a man had been convicted according to this Statute by Proclamation upon default and afterwards conformed himself Where Conformity discharges the penalty he should be discharged of the penalty due upon his Conviction notwithstanding these words and full satisfaction of all the Arrearages And the reason of this given by Coke Chief Justice B. R. in Dr. Fosters Case is for that this Statute saith That such Conviction should be as sufficient as if there were a Verdict recorded but 't is only a Judgment which converts the penalty into a Debt and not a Verdict And here all penalties are discharged upon Conformity unless such as are converted into a Debt But otherwise it would have been if there had been a Judgment against the Recusant upon Trial or Confession on the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 23 Eliz. 1. For then his Conformity would have come too late to have saved the penalty incurred by his Conviction For by the Judgment the penalty was converted into a Debt Rolles 1. 94. C. 41. Quaere tamen Whether these words here due and payable are to be understood due and payable upon a Judgment only However now by the Statute of 1 Jac. cap. 4. 1 Jac. 4. if the Recusant conform either before or after Judgment he shall be discharged of all penalties But the profits of the Recusants Lands taken before his Conformity shall never be restored Savile 130. C. 201. The profits not to be restored It hath been questioned upon this Statute Where the penalty is discharged upon the death of the Recusant where not if a Recusant convicted by Proclamation upon default had died before seizure of two parts of his Lands whether his Lands might have been seized after his death for the Arrearages of the 20 l. per month or if they were seized in his life time whether they should have been discharged after his death without payment of such Arrears And the Opinion of those who held that the seizure should neither ensue nor continue after his death but that the Arrears were discharged was principally grounded upon the aforesaid construction of this Statute viz. that due and payable extended only to Arrearages due and payable upon a Judgment and converted into a Debt But when the Recusant was convicted by Proclamation the penalty was never converted into a Debt and therefore when he died there were no Arrearages due in the sense of this Statute for the heir to pay And yet that by such Offender here is generally intended all Recusants convicted as well by Proclamation upon default as upon Judgment and the heirs of either should have had the benefit of this Proviso viz. That upon the death of the Ancestor no seizure should ensue or be continued only in the Case of a Judgment the Arrears were to have been paid But there seems now to be no further need of this Question for the Statute of 1 Jac. cap. 4. Stat. 1 Jac. 4. meets with both these Cases For if there be no seizure of the Recusants Lands in his life time the discharge of the heir will depend upon his Conformity and if there were a seizure the two parts shall continue in his Majesties possession till the Arrears are paid and satisfied Intailed Lands when discharged and when not But this is not intended of intailed Lands For without any aid of this Proviso if a Recusant Tenant in Tail be convicted by Proclamation upon default and dies neither any seizure for the Arrears of the 20 l. per month shall ensue after his death nor if they were seized in his life time shall the seizure be continued after his death nor is the Heir in Tail bound to pay any such Arrears But if a Judgment be had against the Recusant Tenant in Tail in his life time the Heir is bound in that Case of which see farther in Stat. 1 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 4. If a Judgment was had against the Recusant before the said Statute of 1 Jac. and he had died before seizure of the two parts of his Lands The question was whether after his death they might have been seized by force of this Statute of 29. for the Arrears of the penalty incurred in his life time For that the seizure here given is meerly in nature of a nomine poenae or penalty inflicted for his contempt in not paying the 20 l per month and should not have gone in satisfaction of the Debt But the Queen should have held the Land till the 20 l. per month were otherwise paid and satisfied And when this penalty of seizure was not executed in the Recusants life time by his death the contempt was gone and consequently the penalty inflicted for that contempt could not then be put in Execution Vide Lane 92 93. Beckets Case Ibid. 107. Halseys Case Stat. 1 Jac. 4. But now by the Statute of 1 Jac. 4. the seizure is not as a meer penalty for the contempt of non-payment but for the satisfying of the King of the Arrears of the 20 l. per month and the profits of the Land shall go towards the payment and satisfaction thereof so that now there is no question but the two parts of the Recusants Lands may be seized after his death Seizure after the Recusants death unless the Heir discharge himself by his Conformity Note Discharge upon Affidavit in all these Cases of seizure where the Land is to be discharged upon the death of the Recusant although an Affidavit be made of his death and a discharge obtained thereupon yet 't is a Rule in the Court of Exchequer Commission to enquire That a Commission shall be awarded first to enquire Savile 130. Case 201. And where by the said former Estatute Stat. Sect. 8. The third part of the forfeiture how to be disposed of the third part of the forfeitures for not coming to Divine Service is limited to the Poor Be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That it shall and may be lawful to and for the Lord Treasurer of England Chancellor and Chief Baron of the Exchequer for the time being or two of them to assign and dispose of the full third part of the twenty pounds for every month paid or to be paid into the Receipt of the Exchequer as is aforesaid for the relief and maintenance as well of the Poor and of the Houses of Correction as of impotent and maimed Soldiers as the same Lord Treasurer Chancellor and Chief Baron or any two of them shall order or appoint Any thing in the said Estatute made in the said thrée and twentieth year of her Majesties Reign mentioned to
charged in what not in respect or by reason of his or her Ancestors Recusancy And if at the decease of any such Recusant his heir shall happen to be a Recusant and after shall become conformable and obedient to the Laws and Ordinances of the Church of England and repair to the Church and continue there during the time of the Divine Service and Sermons according to the intent and true meaning of the said Statutes and Ordinances in that behalf made as is aforesaid and also shall take the Oath of Supremacy in such sort as that Oath is expressed in one Act of Parliament made in the first year of the Reign of our late Sovereign Lady Quéen Elizabeth before the Archbishop or Bishop of the Diocess that in every such Case every such heir shall be freed and discharged of all and singular the penalties charges and incumbrances happening upon him or her in respect or by reason of any of his or her Ancestors Recusancy Provided always and be it Enacted by Authority of this present Parliament That if the heir of any Recusant shall happen to be within the age of sixtéen years at the time of the decease of his or her Ancestor and shall after his or her said age of sixteen years become or be a Recusant that in every such Case any such heir shall not be freéd or discharged of all or any of the penalties charges and incumbrances happening upon him or her in respect or by reason of any of his or her Ancestors Recusancy until he or she shall submit or reform him or her self and become obedient to the Laws and Ordinances of the Church of England and repair to the Church and continue there during the time of the Divine Service and Sermons according to the intent and true meaning of the said Statutes and Ordinances in that behalf as is aforesaid and shall take the said Oath of Supremacy in manner and form afore expressed and yet nevertheless from and after such submission and Oath had and taken every such heir shall be fréed and discharged of all and singular the penalties charges and incumbrances happening upon him or her in respect or by reason of any of his or her Ancestors Recusancy If any Recusant shall hereafter die That is Convicted Recusant a Recusant either Convicted upon Proclamation and Default or Convicted by Verdict Confession c. and adjudged For in both those cases if the Recusant die the discharge of the heir depends upon his Conformity Of all and singular the penalties Judgment against Tenant in Tail charges and incumbrances If Judgment be had at the Kings Suit against a Recusant Tenant in Tail for Recusancy this is a charge and incumbrance within this Statute of which the heir in Tail shall not be discharged unless he conforms but must satisfie all the arrears incurred in the life time of his Ancestor For it being a Debt to the King upon a Judgment the intailed Lands are liable thereto by the Statute of 33 H. 8. cap. 39. Stat. 33 H. 8. 39 But these two Clauses discharge the arrears of the Twenty pounds per month incurred in the Recusants life time upon the conformity of the heir in such Cases only where the two parts of the Recusants Lands were not seized before his death Seisure in the Recusants life time for if they are seized in his life time and continue so till his death neither his Fee-simple Lands nor his Intailed Lands if a Judgment were had against him for his Recusancy at the Kings Suit shall be discharged upon the heirs conformity without payment of the arrears for which Vide postea Sect. 4. Stat. Sect. 4. The two parts of a Recusants Lands shall go towards satisfaction of the Twenty pounds per month And be it further Enacted by Authority of this present Parliament That where any seizure shall be had of the two parts of any Lands Tenements Hereditaments Leases or Farmes for the not payment of the Twenty pounds due and payable for each month according to the Statute in that Case lately made and provided That in every such Case every such two parts shall according to the extent thereof go towards the satisfaction and payment of the Twenty pounds due and payable for each month and unpaid by any such Recusant and that the third part thereof shall not be extended or seized by the Kings Majesty his Heirs or Successors for not-payment of the said Twenty pounds payable for each month forfeited or lost by any such Recusant And after his death shall remain in the Kings hands until the arrears be satisfied And where any such seizure shall be had of the two parts of the Lands Tenements Hereditaments Leases or Farmes of any such Recusant as is aforesaid and such Recusant shall die the debt or duty by reason of his Recusancy not paid satisfied or discharged that in every such Case the same two parts shall continue in his Majesties possession until the residue or remainder of the said debt or duty be thereby or otherwise paid satisfied or discharged And that his Majesty his Heirs or Successors shall not seize or extend any third part descending to any such heirs or any part thereof either by reason of the Recusancy of his or her Ancestors or the Recusancy of any such heir What seizure is here meant Where any seizure shall be had That is a seizure upon either a Judgment against the Recusant by Indictment on the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 29 Eliz 6 or on Indictment and Conviction by Proclamation and default of appearance according to the Statute of 29 Eliz. cap. 6. For the seizure of two parts of the Recusants Lands was given the King by 29. upon default of payment of the Twenty pounds per month in either of those Cases as hath been said for which see that Statute Sect. 4. Go towards the satisfaction and payment of the Twenty pounds Stat. 29 Eliz 6 altered Hereby a principal branch of the Statute of 29 Eliz. cap. 6. is altered For whereas by 29. the Queen might for non-payment of the forfeiture have seized two parts of a convicted Recusants Lands nomine poenae and as a gage or penalty until the Twenty pounds per month had been paid and yet the profits should not have gone towards the satisfaction of the said Twenty pounds per month This Statute was made for the ease and benefit of the Recusant in that point The two parts satisfactory of the penalty so that now if two parts of his Lands be seized for default of payment of the forfeiture the profits received to the Kings use shall go towards satisfaction thereof and when the forfeiture is paid out of the profits the Recusant shall have his Land again unless in such Case where the King by force of the Statute of 3 Jac. cap. 4. Stat. 3 Jac. 4. makes his Election and seizes two parts in
lieu of the Twenty pounds per month And therefore the Resolution or Judgment said to be given in the Case of one Gray Anno 1. or 2. Jac. and cited in Beckets Case 8 Jac. Lane 93. and by Sergeant Bridgman in his Argument of Parker and Webbs Case 16 Jac. Rolles 2. 25. and applied thereunto viz. That if a Recusant convicted fails of the payment of the Twenty pounds per month the King shall have his Lands as a gage or penalty and the profits shall not go towards satisfaction thereof However it were true as the Law stood upon 29 Eliz. and before the making of this Act of 1 Jac. yet 't is not Law at this day nor could be applicable to either of those Cases of Becket or Parker and Webb which came to be debated long after this Act was made and the Law of 29 Eliz. altered in that point Vide Stat. 29 Eliz. cap. 6. Sect. 7. Where any such seizure shall be had c. This Relative such takes in both the seizures beforementioned viz. a seizure upon Indictment and Judgment thereupon by force of the Statute of 23 Eliz. and a seizure upon Conviction on Proclamation and default according to the Statute of 29 Eliz. And What seizure is here meant Stat. 23 Eliz 1 29 Eliz. â— as in both those Cases the Recusant who fails of the payment of the Twenty pounds per month shall have the benefit to discount the profits received by the King so the King shall in the like Cases of seizure retain the two parts in his hands after the Recusants death until the residue of the Debt or Duty due and payable to the King be satisfied Where this extends not to Intailed Lands Two parts of the Lands c. of any such Recusant This Clause extends not to Intailed Lands unless where there is a Judgment for the King against the Ancestor for his Recusancy And therefore if the Recusant convicted upon Proclamation and default be Tenant in Tail and two parts of his Lands be seized in his Life time for non-payment of the Twenty pounds per month and he die the arrears not being satisfied to the King yet the heir in Tail shall have the Land out of the Kings hands without payment of the arrears For that such Conviction is in the nature of a Verdict only Conviction upon Proclamation no Judgment and not of a Judgment as was held in Doctor Fosters Case Rolles 1.94 C. 41. And where a Statute gives to the King a seizure or forfeiture of Lands it shall not be intended of Lands in Tail unless it be expresly so appointed by the Statute or by force of some other Statute cooperating therewith In which Case the Intailed Lands may be charged by general words in the Statute which gives the forteiture or seizure An instance whereof we have in the Case of a Recusant Tenant in Tail Indicted Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 Convicted and Adjudged upon 23 Eliz. 1. for his Intailed Lands shall remain after his death in the Kings possession until the arrears be satisfied 29 Eliz. 6 33 H. 8. 39 and that by force of 29 Eliz. c. 6. and this Statute cooperating with the Statute of 33 H. 8. cap. 39. which charges the Lands of the heir in Tail with debts due to the King upon a Judgment had against the Ancestor Praemunire Stat. 16 R. 2. 5 But otherwise 't is in the Case of a Praemunire upon the Statute of 16 R. 2. cap. 5. which saith the Lands and Tenements of the Offender shall be forfeit to the King for there his Intailed Lands shall be forfeit during his life only And the reason is for that general words in an Act of Parliament unless aided by some other Act of Parliament shall never take away the force of the Statute de donis conditionalibus Co. 1. Inst. 130. 391. Co. 11.63 Godbolt 308. Lord Sheffeild and Ratcliffe Treason Stat. 26 H. 8. 13 5 E. 6. 11 And therefore in the Statutes of 26 H. 8. cap. 13. and 5 E. 6. cap. 11. which make Intailed Lands forfeitable for Treason the word inheritance was added any Estate of Inheritance which expresly denotes Lands in Fee Tail as well as Feesimple Now there being neither in this Act or that of 29 Eliz. any express appointment that the two parts of all Lands seized in the Recusants life time wherein he had any Estate of Inheritance shall after his death continue in the Kings possession nor no other Statute which charges the heir in Tail with the forfeiture due to the King upon Conviction by Proclamation and Default the general words here that his Lands Tenements c. shall continue in the Kings possession shall not inforce a construction in prejudice of the Heir in Tail who claims by the Statute de donis conditionalibus but where there is no Judgment the Recusants Fee simple Lands shall after his death satisfie the intent of these Statutes And so was the Law in reference to intailed Lands upon the Statute of 29 Eliz. cap. 6. which speaks of the full satisfaction of Arrearages in Case of the death of the Recusant Arrears where to be paid by the Heir in Tail where not And the Arrears were to have been paid by the Heir in Tail only in such Case where there was a Judgment obtained by the King against the Ancestor for his Recusancy but not where the Ancestor Tenant in Tail was convicted only upon Proclamation and default for in this last Case the Heir in Tail was not bound by the Statute of 33 H. 8. cap. 39. because 't is not a Debt by Judgment as that Statute requires Moore 523. C. 691. And thus the Opinion of the two Chief Justices Trin. 43 Eliz. is to be understood for they held That if intailed Lands had been seized for non-payment of the 20 l. per month and the Tenant in Tail had died the issue in Tail should not have had the Land out of the Queens hands before the Debt were satisfied but should have been charged with the said Debt Cro. Eliz. 846. At the end of which Case is added a Dubitatur But yet the Opinion there held stands good if it be intended only of a Conviction of the Ancestor by Judgment upon Trial or Confession and not of a Conviction upon Proclamation and default And be it further Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament Stat. Sect. 2. None shall go or send any other to a Seminary c. That all and every person and persons under the Kings Obedience which at any time after the end of this Session of Parliament shall pass or go or shall send or cause to be sent any Child or any other person under their or any of their Government into any the parts beyond the Seas out of the Kings Obedience to the intent to enter into or be resident in any Colledge Seminary or House of Iesuits Priests or any other Popish Order
she should not be doubly punished both that way and at the Suit of the Informer And for the same reason it was urged that this Information would not lye against the Husband and Wife for after the Husbands death she would be liable to pay into the Exchequer all the arrears after the rate of Twenty pounds per month from the time of her Conviction and her goods and two parts of her Lands might be then seized for non-payment thereof And if the Husband and Wife should in the mean time at the Suit of the Informer pay Twenty pounds per month for part of the same time for which the Wife was liable to pay after the Husbands death this would be a double punishment for one and the same offence and it was further said that it was usual where the Wife was Indicted and Convicted for Recusancy Seizure of the Wives Lands and Leases to seize by Exchequer Process the Lands and Leases which the Husband had in her right and one Woods Case was cited to this purpose which proves that a Feme Covert is within the meaning of the Act and therefore after she is once Convicted upon Indictment shall be no more subject to the Informers popular Suit then a Feme sole Cro. Pasch 16 Jac. 481.482 But this last point is much to be questioned for the Lands and Leases of the Wife are the Husbands during the Coverture and 't is a general rule that his Goods or Lands cannot be seized for the forfeiture or penalty where the Wife only is Indicted and Convicted of the Offence See more of this matter antea Stat. 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 23 Eliz 1 Sect. 9. A Recusant is Indicted for absenting himself from Church for 12 months and afterwards is Convicted upon that Indictment Where an Informer may sue after Conviction upon Indictment Quaere whether nevertheless the Informer Qui tam c. may not sue him for his absence for the months intervening between the time laid in the Indictment and the time of his Conviction For these words here viz. after such Conviction seem to relate to the proximum antecedens every month and to imply that the penalty here appropriated to the King is only the penalty due for the months which incur after such Conviction upon Indictment at the Kings Suit but not to hinder the Informer after Conviction from suing for the months incurred before Conviction Except in such Cases where the King shall c. refuse the same The King may seize two parts presently after Conviction If a man be Indicted and Convicted of Recusancy the King is not bound to stay till the next Easter or Michaelmas Term to see whether the Recusant will tender twenty pounds for every month contained in the Indictment and incurred after such Conviction for the King having his Election whether he will accept thereof or seize two parts of the Recusants Lands A Commission for seizure of the Lands may issue out presently if the King will wave the twenty pounds per month For he may take his Election as soon as he will after Conviction By Jones Justice in the Case of Standen and the University of Oxford Jones 24. Stat. Sect. 7. Every Conviction shall be certified into the Exchequer And that every Conviction recorded for any Offence before-mentioned shall from the Iustices before whom the Record of such Conviction shall be remaining be certified into the Kings Majesties Court of Exchequer before the end of the Term following such Conviction in such convenient certainty for the time and other circumstances as the Court of Exchequer may thereupon award out Process for the seizure of the Lands and Goods of every such Offender as the Cause shall require And if default shall be made in any part of any payment aforesaid contrary to the form herein before limited that then and so often the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors shall and may by process out of the said Exchequer take seize and enjoy all the Goods and two parts as well of all the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Leases and Farms of such Offender as of all other the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments liable to such seizure or to the penalties aforesaid by the true meaning of this Act leaving the third part only of the same Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Leases and Farms to and for the maintenance and relief of the same Offender his Wife Children and Family Timber Trees All the Goods A Recusant convicted is Tenant for Life the Remainder to a Stranger in Fee He in the Remainder with the Recusants assent cuts down Timber Trees and sells them In this Case the King can be no ways intitled to the Trees Bulstrode 1.133 Vide Stat. 29 Eliz. cap. 6. Sect. 4. Aswell of all the Lands c. Leases and Farms of such Offender Lease in trust for another Elizabeth Bowes was convicted of Recusancy and she standing so Convicted a Lease was made to her in trust which she conveyed over according to the trust The question was whether the King might seize this Lease And the reason given in Lane 39. why the King should have the Term is because the Recusant after she was Convicted was not capable of any trust and therefore the Conveyance made by her was as if it had been voluntary without relation to the Trust Tamen quaere by what Law a Recusant meerly for the matter of Recusancy is incapable of any Trust although Convicted All other the Lands c. liable to such seizure Copyhold Lands Stat. 29 Eliz. 6. or to the penalties aforesaid Whether Copyholds be liable to such seizure vide Stat. 29 Eliz. cap. 6. Sect. 4. Lands are conveyed to A. in trust for B. a convicted Recusant Lands in trust for a Recusant Quaere whether the King may seize such Lands for the Recusants non-payment of the twenty pounds per month for if he make his Election and accepts of two thirds in lieu of the twenty pounds per month there is no question but such Lands are liable to seizure For the words of the subsequent Clause are That the King may seize two parts of all Lands that shall come to any other person to the use of or in Trust for such Recusant But in this Clause which relates to the seizure of two parts for non-payment the words seem to be more restrictive Vide Lane 105. 106. Halseys Case And whereas by an Act made in the Session of Parliament holden by Prorogation at Westminster in the thrée and twentieth year of the Reign of the late Queén Elizabeth entituled Stat. Sect. 8. The Stat. of 23 Eliz. 1. touching a Recusants monthly forfeiture An Act to retain the Subjects of the said late Quéen in their due Obedience It was amongst other things Enacted by Authority of the said Parliament That every person above the age of sixtéen years which should not repair to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer
which the King hath already done or in respect of what the Recusant after his conviction hath omitted to do And therefore if a man be convicted of recusancy upon a popular Suit or an Action of Debt at the Kings Suit alone in which Cases the penalty of Twenty pounds per month is not appropriated to the King for the time to come and he pays the penalty recovered or if he be Convicted upon Indictment and after such Conviction duly pays the Twenty pounds per month into the Exchequer and the King makes no Election to take the two third parts of his Estate in lieu thereof such Recusant may by this Proviso in either of those Cases Sue or Prosecute for any of his Lands Tenements Leases Rents Annuities or Hereditaments whatsoever notwithstanding his Conviction For when the penalty recovered is satisfied or the forfeiture appropriated to the King is duly paid into the Exchequer his Lands c. are not to be seized by force of any Law for Recusancy unless the King make his Election to have the two parts And until that Election they cannot in the sense of this Proviso be said to be Lands to be seized or taken into the Kings hands for that the King cannot have the two parts and the Twenty pounds per month both But if the King make no such Election and the Twenty pounds per month be duly paid into the Exchequer the Recusant is to hold and enjoy all his Lands Tenements c. as if he had never been convicted And during that time there can be no distinction made between the two parts and the Recusant's third part so that in this Case the Recusant must either be enabled to Sue and Prosecute for all his Lands c. or none and to think the latter of these were to render this Proviso nugatory and vain But when once the King hath seized the two thirds for recusancy either by way of Election or for nonpayment of the penalty then the Recusant is enabled to Sue only for the other third part whether in the hands of the King or of a common person Stat. Sect. 14. And for that Popish Recusants are not usually Married nor their Children Christned nor themselves Buried according to the Law of the Church of England but the same are done superstitiously by Popish Persons in secret whereby the days of their Marriages Births and Burials cannot be certainly known Stat. Sect. 15. Marriages of Popish Recusants Be it further Enacted by Authority of this present Parliament That every man being or which shall be a Popish Recusant convicted and who shall be hereafter Married otherwise then in some open Church or Chappel and otherwise then according to the Orders of the Church of England by a Minister lawfully Authorized shall be utterly disabled and excluded to have any Estate of Fréehold into any the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments of his Wife as Tenant by the Courtesie of England And that every Woman being or which shall be a Popish Recusant convicted and who shall be hereafter Married in other form then as aforesaid shall be utterly excluded and disabled not only to claim any Dower of the Inheritance of her Husband whereof she may be endowable or any Iointure of the Lands and Hereditaments of her Husband or any of his Ancestors but also of her Widows Estate and Frank-bank in any Customary Lands whereof her Husband died seized and likewise be disabled and excluded to have or enjoy any part or portion of the goods of her said Husband by vertue of any custom of any County City or Place where the same shall lie or be And if any such man shall be Married with any Woman contrary to the intent and true meaning of this Act which Woman hath or shall have no Lands Tenements or Hereditaments whereof he may be intituled to be Tenant by the Curtesie Then such man so Marrying as aforesaid shall forfeit and lose One hundred pounds the one half thereof to be to the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors and the other moiety to such person or persons as shall Sue for the same by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information in any of the Kings Majesties Courts of Record wherein no Essoin Protection or Wager of Law shall be admitted or allowed Where the Husband is no offender Every man being or which shall be a Popish Recusant Convicted A Man who is no Popish Recusant Convicted marries a Woman who is a Popish Recusant Convicted in other form then is here appointed He shall not forfeit any thing or be disabled by this Act. By a Minister lawfully Authorized Minister lawfully Authorized In an Information upon this Statute for being married otherwise then is here appointed it is sufficient for the Defendant to say that he was married c. by a Minister lawfully Authorized without shewing in particular how or where or when but if a Traverse come of the other side then the Defendant is in his Rejoynder to shew the time and place Vide Bulstrode 2. 50. 52. Creswich against Rookesby Every Woman being or which shall be a Popish Recusant Convicted A Woman who is no Popish Recusant Convicted Where the Wife is no offender marries a Man who is a Popish Recusant Convicted in other form than is here appointed she shall not be disabled by this Branch of the Act For the forfeiture or disability extends only to the Popish Recusant Convicted and as in the Case before recited the Woman only shall be disabled so in this Case the Man only shall forfeit or be disabled Or any Ioynture of the Lands and Hereditaments of her Husband or any of his Ancestors Joynture A Feme who is a Popish Recusant Convicted and married otherwise then is appointed by this Act is not therefore disabled to have any sort of Joynture as Wingate tit Crowne n. 136. mistakes but only such Joynture as is of the Lands or Hereditaments of her Husband or some of his Ancestors and therefore if in consideration of some service done or for some other consideration and for the advancement of A. in marriage Lands are setled upon his intended Wife for her Joynture by some person besides A. who is not any of the Ancestors of A. such Joynture is not within this Act nor shall the Wife although a Popish Recusant Convicted and married otherwise c. be disabled by any strained construction of this Law to enjoy the Lands after her Husbands death For a penal Law shall be taken strictly and not by equity or intendment especially where the intent of the Lawmakers doth not appear to the contrary and the Case such as doth but rarely happen And 't is a good Rule in the construction of Statute Laws which the late Lord Chief Justice Vaughan hath laid down in his Argument of Bole and Hortons Case Mich. 25. Car. 2. viz. when the words of a Law extend not to an inconvenience rarely happening and do to those which often
not extend to compell any Temporal person of or above the degrée of a Baron of this Realm to take or pronounce the Oath abovesaid nor to incur any penalty limited by this Act for not taking or refusing the same Any thing in this Act to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding Where he ought to take it This Act. Although by this Act no Temporal person of or above the degree of a Baron is compellable to take this Oath yet if he be made a Justice of Peace he ought to take it by force of the Statute of 1 Eliz. cap. 1. Jones 152 153. Earl of Lincolns Case Stat. 1 Eliz. 1. A Bishop must take it Temporal Person By these words and the Preamble Forasmuch as c. Archbishops and Bishops although their possessions be Temporalties are excluded out of this Proviso and therefore are to take the Oath For every person who is of the degree of a Baron is not excused as Wingate tit Crown numb 29. mistakes but only the Temporal Lords of Parliament Stat. Sect. 12. Charitable giving Alms to Offenders shall be no cause of forfeiture Provided and be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That charitable giving of reasonable Alms to any of the Offender or Offenders above specified without fraud or covin shall not be taken or interpreted to be any such abettment procuring counselling aiding assisting or comforting as thereby the giver of such Alms shall incur any pain penalty or forfeiture appointed in this Act. Peers offending shall be tried by their Peers Provided also and be it Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament That if any Peér of this Realm shall hereafter offend contrary to this Act or any Branch or Article thereof that in that and all such Case and Cases they shall be tried by their Péers in such manner and form as in other Cases of Treasons they have used to be tried and by none other means Provided also further and be it Enacted Stat. Sect. 13. Who only shall be compelled to take the Oath upon the second tender That no person shall be compelled by vertue of this Act to take the Oath above-mentioned at or upon the second time of offering the same according to the form appointed by this Statute except the same person hath beén is or shall be an Ecclesiastical person that had hath or shall have in the time of one of the Riegns of the Queéns Majesties most Noble Father Brother or Sister or in the time of the Reign of the Queéns Majesty her Heirs or Successors Charge Cure or Office in the Church Or such person or persons as had hath or hereafter shall have any Office or Ministry in any Ecclesiastical Court of this Realm under any Archbishop or Bishop in any the times or Reigns aforesaid Or such person or persons as shall wilfully refuse to observe the Orders and Rites for Divine Service that be authorized to be used and observed in the Church of England after that he or they shall be publickly by the Ordinary or some of his Officers for Ecclesiastical Causes admonished to kéep and observe the same Or such as shall openly and advisedly deprave by words writings or any other open fact any of the Rites and Ceremonies at any time used and authorized to be used in the Church of England Or that shall say or hear the private Mass prohibited by the Laws of this Realm and that all such persons shall be compellable to take the Oath upon the second tender or offer of the same and incur the Penalties for not taking of the said Oath and none other Charge Cure or Office in the Church What Clergy-men are punishable upon the second tender and refusal So that every Clergy-man or Person in Orders is not within the danger of this Law upon the second tender and refusal of the Oath as Wing tit Crown n. 30. mistakes For every Priest or Minister is Clericus Dyer 3 Eliz. 203. and yet shall not incur the penalty of High Treason upon the second refusal unless he be a local Minister or have some Charge Cure or Office in the Church By the Ordinary Ordinary what Ordinary in the Common Law is properly taken for the Bishop of the Diocess but yet usually in the Common Law and in Statutes for every Commissary or Official of the Bishop or other Judge that hath Ordinary Jurisdiction within his limits in Causes Ecclesiastical Stat. W. 2. cap. 19. Stat. 31 E. 3. cap. 11. Termes de la Ley 212. Ordinary 8 H. 6. 3. Co. 1. Inst 344. Or hear the private Mass Hearing Mass If a man once in his life time heareth private Mass it seems he is within this qualification and incurs High Treason upon the second refusal of the Oath and not only if he used to hear it as Wingate tit Crown numb 30. misrecites the Statute Stat. Sect. 14. It shall not be lawful to slay any one attainted in a Praemunire And forasmuch as it is doubtful whether by the Laws of this Realm there be any punishment for such as kill or slay any person or persons attainted in or upon a Praemunire Be it therefore Enacted by Authority aforesaid That it shall not be lawful to any person or persons to slay or kill any person or persons in any manner attainted or hereafter to be attainted of in or upon any Praemunire by pretence reason or authority of any Iudgment given or hereafter to be given in or upon the same or by pretence reason or force of any word or words thing or things contained or specified in any Statute or Law of Provision and Praemunire or in any of them Any Law or Statute or Opinion or Exposition of any Law or Statute to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding Punishments inflicted by former Laws Saving always the due execution of all and every person and persons attainted or to be attainted for any Offence whereupon Iudgment of death now is or ought to be or hereafter may lawfully be given by reason of this Statute or otherwise And saving always all and every such pains of death or other hurt or punishment as heretofore might without danger of Law be done upon any person or persons that shall send or bring into this Realm or any other the Queéns Dominions or within the same shall execute any Summons Sentence Excommunication or other Process against any person or persons from the Bishop of Rome for the time being or by or from the See of Rome or the Authority or Iurisdiction of the same See The Judgment in a Praemunire The Judgment in a Praemunire is to be out of the Kings Protection his Lands Tenements Goods and Chattels to be forfeited to the King and that his body shall remain in Prison at the Kings pleasure Co. 1. Inst 129 130. Co. 3. Inst. 218. Rastal Entr. 466. Judgment But his entailed Lands he shall forfeit only during his Life For this Forfeiture must
Verdict pass against him these are Convictions in Law but yet by these Convictions he forfeits nothing until Judgment nor shall the penalty of 20 l. per month run on or be appropriated to the King until Judgment be given By Convicted therefore is here to be understood convicted by Proclamation and Default or convicted by Verdict Confession c. and adjudged for so the word is here to be taken viz. for adjudged or attainted unless it be in Case of Conviction upon Proclamation And in such a sense it is to be taken in divers other Cases Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 Vide Stat. 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Sect. 5. When the 20 l per month is to be paid In such of the Terms of Easter or Michaelmas That is the Term of Easter or Michaelmas which shall first happen and not the next Easter and Michaelmas Terms both For the Recusant ought to pay the whole penalty for the time contained in the Indictment in the very first of those Terms next after his Conviction See for this Stat. 3 Jac. 4. Stat. 3 Jac. 4. Sect. 6. From what time the said penalty shall run on Stat. 23 Eliz. 1. 3 Jac. 4. For every month after such Conviction For what time the penalty of 20 l. per month shall run on after the Recusant is indicted and convicted and in what Cases the Informer and all others but the King shall be barred after such Conviction Vide Stat. 23 Eliz. cap. 1. antea Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 6. postea Office Take seize and enjoy But as to Lands and Tenements there must first be an Office found for the King for regularly before the finding of such Office Lands or Tenements cannot be seized into the Kings hands Co. 2. Inst 573. Co. 8. 169. Paris Stoughters Case Bro. tit Office 17. 55. Plowden 486. Nicholls Case By this Statute the Queen was to have and enjoy two parts of the Recusants Lands and Hereditaments nomine poenae or districtionis The two parts not satisfactory of the twenty pounds per month until he had in some other manner satisfied her of the whole forfeiture of the Twenty pounds per month incurred for his Recusancy And the profits of those two parts should not have been accompted to go to the payment of any part of the said debt or forfeiture For the Statute inflicted this forfeiture upon him meerly as a farther penalty for his neglect of payment of the Twenty pounds per month as was resolved by the two Chief Justices and Chief Baron Trin. 43 Eliz. in Gages Case Cro. Eliz. 845. 846. and by all the Judges The Law now altered in that point 3 Jac. at Russell House Jones 24. Standen versus Vniversity d'Oxon Whitton But now the Law is altered in this point by the Statute of 1 Jac. cap. 4. Vide the Stat. infra Sect. 4. Stat. 1 Jac. 4 All the goods A Recusant is Indicted and Convicted Recusants goods when forfeited and then fails of payment of the Twenty pounds per month yet his goods are not forfeited to the King by this Statute before seizure For the King hath his Election whether he will seize them or no. By Coke Chief Justice B. R. 12. Jac. Rolles 1. 7. C. 8. Cullom versus Sherman A Recusant lends money Recognizance forfeited and for security hath a Rent-charge granted him in Fee by Deed indented with condition of redemption and takes likewise a Recognizance for performance of Covenants in the said Indenture The Recognizance is forfeited and afterwards he is Indicted and Convicted of Recusancy and fails of payment of the Twenty pounds per month In this case the King shall have the Recognizance by force of this Act for when forfeited to the Recusant it is but a chattel personal What is given to the King by this word Goods and shall pass to the King by this word goods For in an Act of Parliament where the Offenders goods are given to the King all debts and personal Chattels and Actions are thereby given him as well as goods in possession And here in this Act as take and seize refer to two parts of the Recusants Lands and Tenements so enjoy refers to goods And the King shall enjoy the debt due by the Recognizance Nor doth it alter the Case for that the Recognizance was acknowledged for performance of Covenants in an Indenture concerning a Rent-charge in fee which seems to savour of the realty for it was originally for the loan and forbearance of money which is personal Co. 12. 1. 2. Ford and Sheldons Case If a man who is a Recusant take such a Recognizance in the name of another Recognizance taken in anothers name forfeited the King upon his Conviction shall have the Recognizance for when the Recusant was such at the time of taking the Recognizance and so continued until the time of his Conviction it shall be intended that it was done by Covin and that he took it in the name of another with an intent to prevent the King of the levying of the forfeiture and such Covin shall not bar the King Co. 12. 2. 3. the same Case The Kings grant If a Recognizance or Obligation be forfeited to the King by force of this Act he may grant it over as he may any other Chattel in Action under his private Seal Rolles 1. 7. C. 8. Cullom versus Sherman Hereditaments Rent Advowson in gross Hereditaments A Rent of Inheritance and an Advowson in gross are comprehended under this word But whether the King may seize such an Advowson as part of his two parts and present by vertue thereof since the Stat. of 3 Jac. c. 5. which gives the Presentation to the Universities Stat. 3 Jac. 5 Vide that Stat. infra Sect. 19. All other the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments liable to such seisure or to the penalties aforesaid It hath been much disputed whether Copyhold Lands are within this Branch of the Statute Copyhold Lands if seizable for regularly in Acts of Parliament which are Enacted for forfeiture of Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Copyholds shall not be forfeited but only Lands Tenements and Hereditaments which are such at the Common Law and not those which are such by custom only as Copyholds are And it was agreed in Heydons Case Co. 3. 8. That where an Act of Parliament alters the service or tenure or other thing in prejudice of the Lord there general words in the Act shall not extend to Copyholds Vide Savile 67. C. 138. And if the King should seize them by force of the general words here viz. Lands Tenements and Hereditaments the Lord would during the time they are in the Kings hands lose his Seigniory Customs and Services But yet it was held by Manwood Chief Baron and Baron Clark in the Case of Sulherd and Everet Mich. 30 Eliz. That Copyholds are within this Act and although Manwood seemed to grant that they are not within
it directly by express words yet they both conceived they were within the intent of the Act by reason as Manwood said of these words all other the Lands c. liable to such seizure or to the penalties aforesaid But it was granted on all hands that by these general words here the King hath not any estate given him in the Recusants Copyhold Lands but only a right or title to two thirds of the profits By the Kings receiving of which the Lord cannot be impeached of his Customs and Services as he would be if the King should seize the Land it self And a difference was there taken between an Act of Parliament which transfers an Estate to the King and an Act of Parliament which gives him only the profits of the Estate For in the first Case the Rule in Heydons Case that Copyhold Lands shall not pass by general words shall stand good for the prejudice that may otherwise accrew to the Lord But where the Lords Seigniory Customs and Services are not to be Impeached or taken away as here they will not by the Kings bare receiving of the profits there it was said Copyholds shall be included within the general words of Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Leonard 1. 97. C. 126. And yet Vide Owen 37. where this Case is otherwise reported and that it was at length after great debate adjudged that Copyhold Lands are not within this Statute nor are seizable for the Kings two parts And according to this Judgment I take the modern practice of the Exchequer to have been that neither the Land it self nor the profits of Copyhold Lands are liable to such seizure And for the more spéedy conviction of such Offender Stat. Sect. 5. The Indictment sufficient though it be not mentioned that the party is within the Realm in not repairing to Divine Service but forbearing the same contrary to the said Estatute Be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That the Indictment of every such Offender mentioning the not coming of such Offender to the Church of the Parish where such person at any time before such Indictment was or did keép House or Residence nor to any other Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer shall be sufficient in the Law And that it shall not be neédful to mention in any such Indictment that the party Offender was or is inhabiting within this Realm of England or any other the Queens Majestis Dominions But if it shall happen any such Offender then not to be within this Realm or other her Majesties Dominions that in such case the party shall be relieved by Plea to be put in in that behalf and not otherwise And that upon the Indictment of such Offender Stat. Sect. 6. A Proclamation that the party Indicted shall render his Body to the Sheriff a Proclamation shall be made at the same Assizes or Goal delivery in which the Indictment shall be taken if the same be taken at any Assize or Goal delivery by which it shall be commanded that the body of such Offender shall de rendred to the Sheriff of the same County before the said next Assizes or general Goal delivery to be holden in the same County And if at the said next Assizes or Goal delivery the same Offender so proclaimed shall not make appearance of Record that then upon such default Recorded the same shall be as sufficient a conviction in Law of the said Offence whereof the party so standeth Indicted as is aforesaid as if upon the same Indictment a Trial by Verdict thereupon had proceeded and been recorded If the same be taken at any Assize or Goal delivery For if the Indictment had been taken before Justices of Peace Proclamation by whom to be made no Proclamation thereupon could have been made upon this Statute by the Justices of Assize or Goal delivery as was resolved in the Case of Edward Plowden And therefore upon such an Indictment for Recusancy taken before Justices of Peace the Court was to remove the Indictment into the Kings-Bench And there process might have been made out against the Recusant and he convicted For the Justices of Peace could do no more then Indict all other proceedings being taken away from them by this Statute Co. 11. 63. Dr. Fosters Case Rolles 1. 94. C. 41. the same Case But now by the Statute of 3 Jac. cap. 4. the Law is altered in this point Stat. 3 Jac. 4. and the Justices of Peace upon Indictments taken before them may proceed to proclaim and convict the Recusant as well as Justices of Assize and Goal delivery Shall be rendred to the Sheriff Vide Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 5. Before the said next Assizes or general Gaol delivery Vide Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 5. Appearance Make appearance of Record What appearance will serve in this Case Vide Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 5. Vpon such default That is upon his default of appearance of Record at the next Assizes or Goal delivery For if he makes such appearance Default saved that shall save his default of not rendring his Body to the Sheriff and the not rendring himself to the Sheriff shall be no conviction as Wingate would make it to be Tit. Crowne numb 66. As sufficient a Conviction in Law That is as if he were convicted by Verdict Conviction upon Proclamation no Judgment but not as sufficient as if a Judgment were had against the Recusant For although by force of this and other Statutes the conviction upon Proclamation and default of appearance make the Recusant liable to divers penalties and incapacities and is in those respects as forceable as a Judgment yet it shall not in other Cases have the force or effect of a Judgment And therefore it was resolved 37 38 Eliz. in the Case of the general pardon Anno 35 Eliz. where there is an exception of all penalties and forfeitures due to the Queen and converted to a debt by Judgment that notwithstanding that exception a Recusant convicted upon Proclamation was within the pardon and the forfeitures due upon such conviction were thereby pardoned For the debt was not due to the Queen by Judgment but upon conviction only But otherwise it had been if he had been convicted according to the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 without Proclamation and Judgment had been given thereupon Vide Co. 11. 65. Dr. Fosters Case Stat. Sect. 7. Provided always That whensoever any such Offender as is aforesaid shall make submission and become conformable according to the form limited by the same Estatute made in the thrée and twentieth year of the Quéens Majesties Reign The Offender submitting or dying no forfeiture shall ensue or be continued or shall fortune to die that then no forfeiture of twenty pounds for any month or seizure of the Lands of the same Offender from and after such Submission and Conformity or Death and full satisfaction of all
cap. 1. Sect. 9. in that part touching the Informer and the Cases there cited to prove that no other Suits are restrained by that Statute to a year and a day but only Suits by Indictment By Action of Debt Bill Plaint Information If the King sue by any of these ways no Proclamation Proclamation can be made thereupon For the Proclamation given by the Statutes of 29 Eliz. 6. 3 Jac. 4. Stat. 29 Eliz. 6 3 Jac. 4 in Case of Recusancy at the Kings Suit is upon Indictment only Co. 11. 62. Dr. Fosters Case The Kings-Bench Common-Pleas or Exchequer This Statute adds two other Courts where the King may sue for Recusancy Two Courts added where the King may sue Stat. 29 Eliz. 6 or for saying or hearing of Mass For by 29 Eliz. cap. 6. the Queen was limited to the Kings-Bench the Assizes or general Goal delivery and that only by way of Indictment but now by this Statute she might sue not only in those Courts by Indictment but in the Kings-Bench Common-Pleas or Exchequer by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information Co. 11. 61. Dr. Fosters Case But whereas 't is there said that this Statute of 35 takes not off the restriction of the Informer Qui tam c. by the Statute of 29 Eliz. cap. 6. to the Courts there mentioned viz. the Kings-Bench Assizes and general Goal delivery This passage was occasioned by an opinion there held in the said Case of Dr. Foster that the Informer Qui tam c. was restrained by 29. to those Courts The Informer not restrained by 29 Eliz. 6. But that opinion is not Law nor was there ever any such restriction of the Informer for the Statute of 29 Eliz. intends only Suits by Indictment but touches not the popular Action or Information Vide Stat. 29 Eliz. cap. 6. Sect. 2. As c. any other Debt c. should or may be recovered Before this Statute the Queen had no way to recover of the Husband the intire forfeiture for the Recusancy of his Wife For if the Wife had been Indicted of Recusancy at the Queens Suit and convicted thereupon this had not affected the Husband who shall never be charged for the Act or default of his Wife but where he may be made party to the Action or Suit as in an Action of Debt Trespass Action of the Case for scandalous words by the Wife c. but not upon an Indictment And in this respect the Queen having before this Statute no remedy for recovery of the forfeiture but by Indictment where the Husband could not be charged for his Wife the Informer was then in better Case then the Queen For he may charge the Husband and Wife both for the Recusancy of the Wife and shall recover the forfeiture of him by force of the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 Vide that Stat. Sect. 9. But upon the Conviction of the Wife upon Indictment the Queen must have staid till the death of the Husband before she could have levied the forfeiture and if the Wife had died before her Husband it was utterly lost in most Cases Baron and Feme may be charged for Recusancy of the feme But by this Act the Queen might and the King may at this day charge the Husband and Wife joyntly by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information for the Recusancy of the Wife in such sort as he may be charged in any other Action at Common Law for the Debt or Trespass of his Wife and the forfeiture for her Recusancy shall be recovered of him And this was the principal end and scope of making this Branch of the Statute and to this purpose were these words added here In such sort and in all respects as by the ordinary course of the Common Laws of this Realm any other Debt due by any such person in any other Case should or may be recovered Co. 11. 61 62. Dr. Fosters Case Rolles 1. 233 234. Roy versus Law son feme Savile 25. C. 59. Provided always Stat. Sect. 9. How the third part of the Penalties shall be imployed That the third part of the penalties to be had or received by vertue of this Act shall be imployed and bestowed to such good and charitable uses and in such manner and form as is limited and appointed in the Statute made in the 28. year of her Majesties Reign touching Recusants The Statute here mentioned Stat. 29 Eliz. 6 and called the Statute of 28 Eliz. is the same with 29 Eliz. cap. 6. before recited It being in some Books called the Statute of 28 in others of 29 but as it seems more properly 29. For the Session wherein it was made was by Prorogation held the 15 of February 29. Eliz. Provided also That no Popish Recusant Stat. Sect. 10. Popish Recusant or Feme Covert not to abjure Popish recusant or Feme Covert shall be compelled or bound to abjure by vertue of this Act. No Popish Recusant Here Wingate tit Crowne n. 77. leads his Reader into a great mistake for he mentions only a Feme Covert leaving out the Popish Recusant Feme Covert not here excepted in all Cases Or Feme Covert In the late additions to Dalton cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 7. 't is said that no married Woman is punishable by this Statute but are thereout excepted whereas in truth they are no where excepted throughout this Statute save only that they shall not be compelled or bound to abjure For if a married Woman comes not to Church but forbears for a month and goes to Conventicles or any other Meetings or Assemblies under colour or pretence of the exercise of Religion contrary to Law whether they be Popish or other or perswades others so to do or to forbear the Church or to impugne the Kings Authority in Causes Ecclesiastical she shall be imprisoned by force of this Act until she conform and submit her self but she cannot be further proceeded against so as to require her to abjure A married Woman with her Husband is likewise punishable by this Act for her Recusancy by Action of Debt c. brought against her and her Husband at the Kings Suit so that 't is a great mistake to say she is not punishable by this Statute Stat. Sect. 11. The forfeiture of him that abjures or refuses to abjure The Wise shall lose no Dower nor the heir any Land for these Offences Provided also That every person that shall abjure by force of this Act or refuse to abjure being thereunto required as aforesaid shall forfeit and lose to her Majesty all his goods and chattels forever and shall further lose all his Lands Tenements and Hereditaments for and during the life only of such offender and no longer and that the Wife of any Offender by force of this Act shall not lose her dower nor that any corruption of Blood shall grow or be by reason of any offence
although he be there personally present and openly confess himself to be the same person who was Indicted and against whom the Proclamation issued yet if he deny to appear upon the Proclamation or to consent that his appearance be entred of Record it seems that his appearance cannot be Recorded but his default shall and he shall stand Convicted thereupon And this is no more an appearance then where a Prisoner is brought to the Common Pleas Bar by habeas Corpus to the intent to have him appear to an Original brought against him and he denies to appear to the Action in which Case his appearance cannot be Recorded as was resolved in Ascoughs Case 43 Eliz. Gouldsborough 118. Shall be as sufficient a conviction in Law That is a Recusant thus Convicted upon Proclamation and Default of appearance shall be in the same Condition as if he were convicted by Verdict but no Judgment is given Bridgman 122. Parker versus Webb But this Conviction upon Proclamation is no Judgment as was resolved in Doctor Fosters Case Co. 11.65 Conviction upon Proclamation no Judgment And although it shall make the Recusant liable to the several forfeitures penalties and incapacities inflicted on Recusants convict yet it shall not operate as a judgment as hath been already shewed in divers instances For this reason it hath been questioned whether if a Recusant be Convicted upon Indictment and Proclamation the King may not wave his advantage of this Conviction and bring his Action of Debt given him by the Statute of 35 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 35 Eliz. 1 For that such Conviction is no Judgment and consequently ought not to bind the King as a Judgment against the Recusant should have done Palmer 40.41 Sir John Webbs Case Worsley obtained a Patent to have all the Penalties of Recusants convict Although such a Patent was illegal for that the King cannot grant the penalty of a penal Law to a Subject for which Vide Rolles 1.10 C. 11. Roy versus Tollin Hobart 155. Colt Glover versus the Bishop of Coventry and Litchfield Ib. 183. Davison versus Barber yet admitting the Patent to be good The King cannot grant the forfeiture on a penal Law it was resolved that the penalties of Recusants convicted by Proclamation should not pass by those general words Rolles 1. 94 95. C. 41. Doctor Fosters Case And be it further Enacted Stat. Sect. 6. The penalty of a convicted Recusant That every offender in not repairing to Divine Service but forbearing the same contrary to the Statutes in that behalf made and provided that hereafter shall fortune to be thereof once convicted shall in such of the Terms of Easter and Michaelmas as shall be next after such Conviction pay into the Receipt of the Exchequer after the rate of Twenty pounds for every month which shall be contained in the Indictment whereupon such conviction shall be And shall also for every month after such Conviction without any other Indictment or Conviction forfeit Twenty pounds and pay into the Receipt of the Excheqver aforesaid at two times in the year that is to say in every Easter and Michaelmas Term as much as then shall remain unpaid after the rate of Twenty pounds for every month after such Conviction except in such Cases where the King shall and may by force of this Act refuse the same and take two parts of the Lands Tenements Hereditaments Leases and Farms of such Offender till the said party being Indicted for not coming to Church contrary to former Laws shall conform himself and come to Church according to the meaning of the Statute in that behalf made and provided What Convictions are here meant Once Convicted This extends to all Convictions whatsoever upon Indictment whether by Verdict Confession c. whereupon Judgment is given as well as to Convictions upon Proclamation and default And the penalty of Twenty pounds per month shall in any of the said Cases run on forever after and be appropriated to the King Stat. 29 Eliz. 6 Vide Stat. 29 Eliz. cap. 6. Sect. 4. In what Term the forfeiture is to be paid In such of the Terms of Easter and Michaelmas as shall be next after such conviction Here Easter and Michaelmas is to be taken disjunctively for Easter or Michaelmas as it is in the Statute of 29 Eliz. cap. 6. Sect. 4. For the meaning is not that the Recusant shall have both of the Terms of Easter and Mithaelmas next after his Conviction wherein to pay the forfeiture of Twenty pounds for every month contained in the Indictment But he ought to pay the whole into the Exchequer the next Easter or Michaelmas Term which shall first happen after his Conviction And therefore if he be convicted in February he ought to pay the whole the next Easter Term unless where the King chooses to seize the two thirds of his Lands by force of this Statute as was admitted in the Case of Standen and the University of Oxford Hill 20 Jac. Jones 24. 25. And in the Lady Webbs Case who was convicted in March the pleading was that in the Easter Term then next following the said Katherine did not pay into the Exchequer according to the rate of 20 l. per month without any mention of Michaelmas Term Bridgman Pasch 16 Jac. 121. For every month after such Conviction By this Clause and that of 29 Eliz. cap. 6. Sect. 4. 29 Eliz. 6. Penalty appropriated to the King to the same purpose after the Recusant is once Convicted the penalty of Twenty pounds per month shall run on without any new Indictment or Conviction and shall be for ever afterwards appropriated to the King alone and paid into the Exchequer so that the Informer cannot bring any popular Action or Information for the Twenty pounds per month Informer barred for any time incurred after such Conviction but is utterly barred Co. 11.61 Doctor Fosters Case Rolles 1. 93. C. 41. the same Case Owen 37. Sulherd and Evererds Case The Lady Webb was Indicted and Convicted of Recusancy upon Proclamation and default of appearance Whether barred in the Case of a Feme Covert and afterwards an Informer Qui tam c. sued her and her Husband for a new offence of Recusancy in the Wife subsequent to such Conviction to which they both pleaded the said Conviction at the Kings Suit The question was whether the Informer should be barred by this Plea or whether the Information was maintainable notwithstanding such former Conviction of the Wife for that the Wife seems not to be such an Offender as is here intended because she can have no Goods or Lands during the Husbands life which may be seized for non-payment of the penalty But it was granted on all hands that if she had been a Feme sole this had been a good Plea in bar of the Informers popular Suit for then she had been bound to pay the Twenty pounds per month into the Exchequer and
but forbear the same contrary to the tenor of a Statute made in the first year of the Reign of the said late Quéen for Vniformity of Common Prayer and being thereof lawfully convicted should forfeit to the said Quéen for every month after the end of the said Session of Parliament which he or she should so forbear twenty pounds of lawful English money as in and by the said Act of Parliament more at large appeareth And whereas afterward by another Act of Parliament of the said Quéen It was further Enacted by the Authority of the said Parliament amongst other things how and when the said payments of the said 20 l. should be made and that if default should be made in any part of any payment of the said twenty pounds contrary to the form in the said last specified Statute limited that then and so often the said Quéen should and might by Process out of her Highness Exchequer take seize and enjoy all the Goods and two parts as well of all the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Leases and Farms of such Offender as of all other the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments liable to such seizure or to the penalties aforesaid by the true meaning of the said Act of Parliament leaving the third part only of the same Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Leases and Farms to and for the maintenance and relief of the same Offender his Wife Children and Family as in and by the last specified Statute more at large also may appear Now forasmuch as the said penalty of twenty pounds monthly is a greater burden unto men of small living then unto such as are of better ability and do refuse to come unto Divine Service as aforesaid who rather then they will have two parts of their Lands to be seized will be ready always to pay the said twenty pounds according to the limitation of the said Statutes and yet retain the residue of their livings and Inheritance in their own hands being of great yearly value which they do for the most part imploy as experience hath taught to the maintenance of Superstition and Popish Religion and to the relief of Iesuits Seminaries Popish Priests and other dangerous persons to the State Therefore to the intent that hereafter the penalty for not repairing to Divine Service might be inflicted in better proportion upon men of great ability Be it Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament The King may refuse 20 l. a month and take two parts of a Recusants Lands That the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors shall from and after the Feast of St. Michael the Archangel next coming after the end of this Session of Parliament have full power and liberty to refuse the penalty of twenty pounds a month though it be tendred ready to be paid according to the Law and thereupon to seize and take to his own use and the uses intents and purposes hereafter limited two parts in threé to be divided as well of all the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Leases and Farms that at the time of such seizure shall be or afterward shall come to any the said Offenders in not coming to Church or any other to his or her use or in trust for him or her or at his or her disposition or whereby or wherewith or in consideration whereof such Offender or his Family or any of them shall be relieved maintained or kept as of all other Lands Tenements and Hereditaments in any wise or at any time liable to such seizure or to the penalties aforesaid and the same to retain to his own and other uses intents and purposes hereafter in this Act appointed till every such Offender shall conform him or her self respectively as aforesaid in lieu and full recompence of the twenty pounds monthly that during his such seizure and retainer shall incur any thing in the said Statutes or any of them or any other Statute to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding saving to our Soveraign Lord the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors and all and every person and persons Saving the Right of others bodies politick and corporate their Heirs and Successors other then the said Offender his or her Heirs and all claiming to his or their use or in trust for him or them or at his or their will or disposition all and all manner of Leases Rents Conditions and other Rights and Titles whatsoever had made and done bona fide and without fraud and covin before such seizure Though it be tendred or ready to be paid By this Branch of the Act a new advantage is given to the King against the Recusant For whereas by the Statute of 29 Eliz. cap. 6. Stat. 29 Eliz. 6. the convicted Recusant had his Election to pay the King twenty pounds per month and so prevent the seizure of the two third parts of his Lands now by this Statute that Election is taken away Election taken from the Recusant and given to the King and the choice is given to the King whether he will accept of the twenty pounds per month or refuse it and seize two third parts of the Recusants Lands in lieu thereof and if the King chooses the Lands the tender of the twenty pounds per month at the Exchequer will not save the seizure but the King shall enjoy the Lands notwithstanding Jones 24 25. Standen versus University of Oxford Hereditaments An Advowson is an Hereditament Hereditament Advowson and passes by that word 18 Eliz. Dyer 351. and is devisable by the Statute of 32 H. 8. cap. 1. of Wills as an Hereditament and if it be an Advowson in gross yet it may be seized by the King by force of this Act as part of his two parts of the Recusants Hereditaments Jones 23 24. Standen versus University of Oxford For 't is a thing valuable and shall be Assets and is extendable for the Kings Debt and upon a Writ of right of an Advowson there shall be a Recovery in value scil for every mark twelve pence Fitzh Recovery in value 9. 11. Hobart 304. London versus the Chapter of Southwell Co. 1. Inst 374. Britton 185. In the late Additions to Dalton cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 23. 't is said That the King may refuse the twenty pounds per month and take to two parts of the Recusants Lands and all the Goods c. And an Advowson is without that Clause and the said Case of Standen and the University of Oxon is there cited for Authority But this is a mistake as to the Clause it self and as to the point in Law and the Authority brought for it For in truth there is no such Clause in this Statute nor in any other that the King upon refusal of the twenty pounds per month should take the Recusants Goods For the seizure of the Goods is given where the Offender fails of payment of the twenty pounds per month Where a Recusants Goods cannot be seized but not
where the King discharges him of that payment by refusing it so that where the King refuses the twenty pounds per month the Recusants Goods cannot be seized but only two parts of his Lands The Law likewise is mistaken For if the King refuses the twenty pounds per month he may seize an Advowson as part of his two parts as hath been said so that an Advowson is within this Clause An Advowson is within this Clause and not without it And the Case of Standen and the University of Oxon is quite contrary to that Opinion in the late Additions to Dalton For Justice Jones held strongly that an Advowson was within this Clause And Hobart Chief Justice and Justice Winch declared themselves to be of the same mind and Justice Hutton denied not that an Advowson was within it only held that the force of it as to an Advowson in gross was taken away by the Statute of 3 Jac. cap. 5. Stat. 3 Jac. 5. University which gives the Presentation to the University But the three other Justices were against him and held That where the King had seized it as part of his two parts and the Incumbent died The King should present and not the University See of this matter more at large Stat. 3 Jac. car 5. Sect. 19. If the King seize by Inquisition two parts of a Mannor belonging to a Recusant Convict to which an Advowson is Appendant Two parts of an Advowson Appendant seized by seizure of two parts of the Mannor by such seizure two parts of the Advowson are likewise seized by consequence although it be not named in the Inquisition as was resolved in the Case of the Chancellor c. of Cambridge and Walgrave Hobart 126 127. Moore 872. C. 1214. The King shall present alone And there although the King hath Title but to two parts of the Advowson yet he shall present alone by his Prerogative as was resolved in that Case and so he should have done where there were three Coparceners of an Advowson two of full age and one under age and in Ward to the King the King only should by his Prerogative have presented during the Wardship 47 E. 3. 14. 38 H. 6. 9. But yet His two parts shall not pass from him by general words although two parts of an Advowson shall pass to the King by the word Hereditaments and the seizure of the Mannor shall draw with it the seizure of the Advowson yet the Kings two parts of the Advowson shall not pass from him by such general words And therefore if the King seizes two parts of a Mannor belonging to a Recusant Convict to which an Advowson is Appendant and grants over his two parts of the Mannor to a Subject with all Hereditaments Appurtenances c. yet two parts of the Advowson will not pass unless specially named or the grant be adeo plene integre in tam amplis modo forma prout c. the Recusant had the Mannor Hobart 126 127. Moore 872. C. 1214. All other Lands c. liable to such seizure or to the Penalties aforesaid Whether Copyhold Lands Copyhold Lands are seizable by force of these words Vide Stat. 29 Eliz. cap. 6. Sect. 4. Stat. 29 Eliz. 6. In lieu and full Recompence of the twenty pounds monthly So that if the King make his Election to seize the two parts the Recusant is no longer liable to pay the twenty pounds per month The twenty pounds per month discharged but the two parts of his Lands shall go in lieu and full Recompence thereof Jones 24. Standen versus University of Oxon. Provided always Stat. Sect. 9. A Recusants Mansion house shall be reserved to him and be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors shall not take into his two parts but leave to such Offender his chief Mansion House as part of his third part and shall not Demise Lease or put over the said two parts nor any part thereof to any Recusant nor to or for the use of any Recusant The Kings two parts shall not be demised to a Recusant And that whosoever shall take the same in Lease or otherwise of his Majesty his Heirs and Successors shall give such security not to commit nor suffer wast to be committed in or upon any the said premises as by the Court of Exchequer shall be allowed sufficient His chief Mansion House Mansion House Mansion house is in Law most commonly taken for the chief Messuage or habitation of the Lord of a Mannor or the Mannor House where he most remains or continues Termes de la Ley 199. Mansion But it is to be taken here in a larger sence for any other House which is the Recusants chief dwelling House And for the better Tryal how his Majesties Subjects stand affected in point of their Loyalty and due Obedience Stat. Sect. 10. Who are compellable to take the Oath Be it also Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That from and after the end of this present Session of Parliament it shall be lawful to and for any Bishop in his Diocess or any two Iustices of Peace whereof one of them to be of the Quorum within the limits of their Iurisdiction out of the Sessions to require any person of the age of Eightéen years or above being or which shall be Convict or Indicted of or for any Recusancy other then Noblemen or Noblewomen for not repairing to Divine Service according to the Laws of this Realm or which shall not have received the said Sacrament twice within the year then next past Noblemen and Noblewomen excepted or any person passing in or through the County Shire or Liberty and unknown except as is last before excepted that being examined by them upon Oath shall confess or not deny himself or her self to be a Recusant or shall confess or not deny that he or she had not received the said Sacrament twice within the year then last past to take the Oath hereafter following upon the holy Evangelist Certificate of the name and place of abode of him which taketh the Oath Which said Bishop or two Iustices of the Peace shall certifie in writing subscribed with his or their Hands at the next General or Quarter Sessions for that Shire Limit Division or Liberty within which the said Oath shall be so taken the Christen Name Surname and place of aboad of every person which shall so take the said Oath which Certificate shall be there recorded by the Clerk of the Peace or Town-Clerk and kept amongst the Records of the said Sessions Where this Oath cannot be tendred Passing in or through the County Shire or Liberty and unknown These words passing and unknown being in the Conjunctive it seems that the Bishop or two Justices ought not to examine upon Oath or tender this Oath to any Passenger or Traveller quatenus such unless he be unknown viz. such an
be a Popish Recusant convict at any time after his or her conviction shall exercise any publick Office or Charge in the Commonwealth but shall be utterly disabled to exercise the same by himself or by his Deputy except such Husband himself and his Children which shall be above the age of nine years abiding with him and his Servants in houshold shall once every month at the least not having any reasonable excuse to the contrary repair to some Church or Chappel usual for Divine Service and there hear Divine Service And the said Husband and such his Children and Servants as are of méet age receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper at such times as are limited by the Laws of this Realm and do bring up his said Children in true Religion This Clause extends not to all sorts of Recusants who are convicted or have Wives who are Recusants convicted as is mistaken in the late additions to Dalton cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 46. To whom this clause extends But at this day only to the Popish Recusant convicted or having a Wife who is a Popish Recusant convicted To whom not A Popish Recusant not convicted hath a Wife who is convicted of Recusancy but is no Popish Recusant The Husband is not disabled by this Statute to exercise any publick Office or Charge for that neither the Husband is a convicted Recusant nor the Wife a Popish Recusant A person who is convicted of Recusancy but is no Popish Recusant hath a Wife who is a Popish Recusant but not convicted The Husband is out of this Branch of the Statute for that neither the Husband is a Popish Recusant nor the Wife convicted Stat. Sect. 11. A Married Woman being a Popish Recusant And be it also Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That every Married Woman being or that shall be a Popish Recusant convict her Husband not standing convicted of Popish Recusancy which shall not conform her self and remain conformed but shall forbear to repair to some Church or usual place of Common Prayer and there to hear Divine Service and Sermon if any then be and within the said year receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper according to the Laws of this Realm by the space of one whole year next before the death of her said Husband shall forfeit and loose to the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors the issues and profits of two parts of her Ioynture and two parts of her Dower in thrée parts to be divided during her life of or out of any the Lands Tenements or Hereditaments which are or were her said Husbands and also be disabled to be Executrix or Administratrix of her said Husband and to have or demand any part or portion of her said late Husbands Goods or Chattels by any Law custom or usage whatsoever The issues and profits of two parts of her Ioynture and two parts of her Dower A Woman may have Joynture and Dower both And not of two parts of her Joynture or Dower as Wingate tit Crown numb 134. For there are divers Cases where notwithstanding the Statute of 27 H. 8. cap. 10. the Wife shall have her Dower and Joynture both And forfeit two parts of both And if she offend against this branch she shall forfeit the profits of two parts of both And that not only where the Joynture made to her is not warranted by that Statute but in some Cases where the Joynture is pursuant and according to the Statute she shall have her Dower and Joynture both Of the first sort are these Where the Joynture is not warranted by Stat. 27 H. 8. 10. If an Estate be made of Lands to the Wife for the life of another Co. 4. 3. Vernons Case Or for a thousand years or for a thousand years if she live so long Co. 1. Inst 36. Or if a Rent be granted to the Wife for the life of another or for years or any other way not pursuant to that Statute Vide Anderson 1. 288. c. 296. Bickley's Case Anderson 2. 30 31. c. 20. Wentworths Case Or if an Estate be made to others in fee or for the Wives life upon Trust for her benefit Co. 1. Inst 36. Or if a man Covenant to stand seized to the use of himself in Tail the Remainder to the use of his Wife for life Pasch 16. Jac. B. R. Woods Case Or if the Husband make a Feoffment in see to the use of himself for life the remainder to another for life or years the remainder to the Wife for her life Co. 4. 2. 3. Hutton 51. Sherwells Case In all these Cases although the Lands or Rent were conveyed to the Wife for her Joynture yet the Estate not being within the Statute of 27 H. 8. her acceptance thereof shall not bar her Dower but she shall have such Joynture and her Dower also And the reason why in the two last Cases the Wife shall not be barred of her Dower although there be an Estate limited to her for her life is because the Estate is not in its first Creation appointed to take immediately after the death of the Husband And no matter which arises ex post facto can salve this or make it a Joynture within that Statute to bar her Dower And therefore if in the first of those two Cases the Husband Tenant in Tail dies without issue or if in the last Case he in the remainder die before the Husband or the term for years determines in the Husbands life time so that the Wife may enter presently after his death yet because the Estate to the Wife for her life was not originally limited to take immediately after his death it shall not bar her Dower For quod ab initio non valet in tractu temporis non convalescet Co. 4. 2 3. Hutton 51. And as in all the Cases before mentioned if the Estate were made for her Joynture the Wife shall have such Joynture and her Dower both so if she be an Offender within this branch of the Act and conform not within the year next before her Husbands death she shall forfeit the profits of two parts of both Of what Lands she shall not forfeit the profits But otherwise it is where an Estate is given or limited by the Husband to the Wife and it s neither expressed nor can be averred and proved to be given or limited for her Joynture or in recompence of her Dower And therefore if any of the Estates before mentioned which are not within the Statute of 27 H. 8. be granted or limited to the Wife by the Husband or any other Estate for her life or otherwise which would be a good Joynture within the said Statute if it were intended for a Joynture as if a man before or after Marriage Covenants to stand seized of Lands to the use of himself for life the Remainder to his Wife for her life and it is neither expressed in the Deed nor can be averred and
the person Co. 1. Inst 128. Plea in disability is peremptory The Defendant in Debt upon an Obligation pleads that the Plaintiff is a Popish Recusant Convict who replies nul tiel Record Such Plea in disability of the person is peremptory and nul tiel Record is an Issue and Judgment shall be given against the Defendant upon failer of the Record Hetley 18. But yet if there be a Plea of a Conviction of Recusancy had before Justices of Gaol delivery and the Defendant mistakes and takes out a Certiorari Certiorari to the Justices of Peace this shall not be a failer of the Record Failer of Record although the Defendant hath it not at the day For that the issuing of the Certiorari was the Award of the Court But a Certiorari shall be awarded de novo to the Justices of Gaol delivery before whom the Plaintiff was convicted Hobart 135. Pye against Thrill Note if the Defendant be sued in the Common Pleas or any other of the principal Courts at Westminster and he plead a Conviction of Recusancy before Justices of Gaol delivery or Justices of Peace he need not take his Certiorari Certiorari out of what Court out of the Chancery and so bring it by Mittimus But the Court may send a Certiorari immediately to that inferiour Court where the Plaintiff was convicted as was held in that Case of Pye and Thrill vide 19 H. 6. 19. And the Justices themselves And by whom before whom the Conviction was had must certifie and therefore if the Conviction was before Justices of Peace the Certificate cannot be by the Custos Rotulorum Custos rotulorum alone though he keep the Records for the Certiorari is in such Case directed to the Justices of Peace Hobart 135. A Popish Recusant is convicted of Recusancy in a popular Suit and after such Conviction sues the Informer Qui tam c. Who may take advantage of this disability Informer upon some other matter or cause of Action arising between them Quaere whether the Defendant may plead such Conviction in disability of the Recusant For this Conviction disables the Recusant to sue as if he were excommunicated and no otherwise Now if a Bishop Excommunicate any one and the Bishop Bishop be afterwards sued at Law for any other matter or cause by the person so excommunicated the Bishop cannot plead this Excommunication in disability of the Plaintiff who sues him Co. 1. Inst 134. Swinborne Part 5. Sect. 6. p. 305. And the reason given for this in Trollops Case Co. 8. 68. is because the Bishop was a party to the Excommunication and therefore shall take no advantage by it which reason seems to hold likewise in the Case of an Informer Qui tam c. who is a party to the Conviction of the Recusant upon the popular Suit which Conviction renders the Recusant disabled to all intents as an Excommunicant person And therefore he being a party to it by the same Rule shall not take advantage of it in disability of the Recusant in any Action brought by the Recusant against him But yet notwithstanding I conceive the Informer Qui tam c. at whose Suit the Recusant was convicted may well take advantage of this Conviction and plead it in disability of the person of the Recusant And that the true reason why the Bishop shall not be admitted to plead an Excommunication pronounced by himself in disability of the person Excommunicated is not because he is a party to the Excommunication but because in matters of Excommunication the Bishop acts as a Judge and 't is by his Sentence and Authority that the party is Excommunicated and he shall not take advantage in another Suit of a Sentence given by himself judicially And this will not hold in the Case of an Informer who though he be a party to the Suit in which the Recusant is disabled as an Excommunicate person yet is no Judge in the Case whether the party Sued shall be disabled or no as the Bishop is in the other Case where the party is actually Excommunicated by him And if the Bishop should be barred to Plead and take advantage of such Excommunication because he is a party thereunto it would follow that the person who Sues in the Spiritual Court and at whose instance the person Sued is Excommunicated should be barred likewise to take advantage of such disability in the Plaintiff at Law for he is a party to the Excommunication for that he is a party to the Suit upon which the Excommunication is originally founded But the contrary to this is strongly implied in 14 H. 4. 14. where the Case was A. was Excommunicated in a Suit depending between him and B. and afterwards A. Sues B. upon the Statute of Praemunire who pleads this Excommunication in disability of the Plaintiff Here the Plea was disallowed because the principal Suit on which the Excommunication depended was brought before the Pope But in the debate of the Case there was not the least word of exception to the Plea upon this ground because the Excommunication was at the instance of the Defendant or that the Defendant should not take advantage of the Plaintiffs disability for that he was a party to the Excommunication which disabled him Executor or Administrator disabled If an Executor or Administrator becomes a Popish Recusant convict it seems he is disabled by this Act to Sue in either of those Capacities For the Act saith He shall be disabled to all intents as an Excommunicate person Now a person actually Excommunicated cannot Sue as Executor or Administrator as is held in 21 E. 4. 49. 21 H. 6. 30. 14 H. 6. 15. Co. 1. Inst 134. Although there are some opinions to the contrary Vide Finch 27. Stat. Sect. 13. What Suits a Popish Recusant may prosecute Provided nevertheless That it shall and may be lawful for any such person so disabled for and notwithstanding any thing in this Law contained to sue or prosecute an Action or Suit for or concerning only such of his or her Lands Tenements Leases Rents Annuities and Hereditaments or for the Issues and Profits thereof which are not to be seized or taken into the Kings hands his Heirs or Successors by force of any Law for or concerning his or her Recusancy or any part thereof Which are not to be seized or taken into the Kings hands c. These words are not restrained to such Lands Lands seized into the Kings hands c. as cannot be seized into the Kings hands for Recusancy For then the Recusant could in no case Sue for more then the third part for that the King may if he please make his Election and seize the other two parts in lieu of the Twenty pounds per month But they are intended of all Lands c. of the Recusant which neither the King hath seized nor are by Law to be seized by vertue of any thing
happen it is good reason not to strain the words farther then they reach but to say it is casus omissus and that the Law intended quae frequentius accidunt Vaughan 373. And yet there is no question but such Lands are a Joynture The extent of the word and if made with the Wives assent before marriage shall bar her Dower by the Statute of 27 H. 8. cap. 10. which speaks of an Estate or purchase made to the Wife for her Joynture generally not saying by whom Mr. Sheapard therefore in his Epitome p. 523. falls very short of the full description of a Joynture when he limits it only to be of the Franktenement of her Husband which restriction dayly experience confutes For that it is commonly made by the Ancestor of the Husband of Lands in which the Husband never had any Franktenement nor perhaps ever shall have Custom By vertue of any custom of any County City or Place And not of Cities only as 't is restrained in the late additions to Dalton cap. 85. tit Recusants Sect. 48. Where in force The Custom here mentioned viz. that the Wife shall have a certain portion of her Husbands goods after his decease is of force throughout the whole Province of York and in divers other places of England and if he gives them away from her by his Will the bequest is void Vide Swinburne Part 3. cap. 14. p. 151. 152. What goods are not within the Act. A Woman is an offender within this Branch and her Husband by his last will gives her all or part of his goods not claimable by custom she is not by this Act disabled to enjoy them after his death For the words here are plainly restrictive to such goods as she claims by custom Where not Tenant by Curtesie not One hundred pounds forfeited Whereof he may be intituled to be Tenant by the Curtesie A Popish Recusant convicted marries an Inheritrix in other form then is appointed by this Act The Wife dies without issue born alive of the marriage In this Case although the Husband is not intituled to be Tenant by the Courtesie yet the possibility which he once had to be so intituled seems to satisfie the intent of the Act and he shall not forfeit the hundred pounds So that here is another Casus omissus For it may so happen that a Popish Recusant Convict may have a great Portion in money with his Wife and but a small Estate in Lands with her perchance but a few Acres yet if he be an Offender within this branch the Lands for that he may be intituled to be Tenant of them by the Courtesie shall save his hundred pounds and if his Wife die having had no issue born alive he is wholly exempted out of the Act and cannot be punished either way Stat. Sect. 16. Baptism of Popish Recusants Children And that every Popish Recusant which shall hereafter have any Child born shall within one month next after the Birth thereof cause the same Child to be baptized by a lawful Minister according to the Laws of this Realm in the open Church of the same Parish where the Child shall be born or in some other Church near adjoyning or Chappel where Baptism is usually administred or if by infirmity of the Child it cannot be brought co such place then the same shall within the time aforesaid be baptized by the lawful Minister of any of the said Parishes or places aforesaid upon pain that the Father of such Child if he be living by the space of one month next after the Birth of such Child or if he be dead within the said month then the Mother of such Child shall for every such Offence forfeit one hundred pounds of lawful money of England one third part whereof to be to the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors one other third part to the Informer or him that will sue for the same and the other third part to the Poor of the said Parish to be recovered by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information in any of the Kings Majesties Courts of Record wherein no Essoign Protection or Wager of Law shall be admitted or allowed And if any Popish Recusant man or woman Stat. Sect. 17. Burial of Popish Recusants not excommunicate not being Excommunicate shall be buried in any place other than in the Church or Churchyard or not according to the Ecclesiastical Laws of this Realm That the Executors or Administrators of every such person so buried knowing the same or the party that causeth him to be so buried shall forfeit the sum of twenty pounds the one third part whereof shall be to our Soveraign Lord the King the other third part to the Informer or him or them that will sue for the same and the other third part to the Poor of the Parish where such person died to be recovered by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information in any of the Kings Majesties Courts of Record wherein no Essoign Protection or Wager of Law shall be admitted or allowed The Exception here of a Popish Recusant Excommunicate That is not actually Excommunicate is intended only of one actually Excommunicated and not of him who is a Popish Recusant convicted who shall not be reputed as a person Excommunicate to this intent but only as to the point of a disability as hath been said Sect. 12. So that if any Popish Recusant not actually Excommunicate be buried elsewhere or otherwise then is here mentioned although he were convicted yet 't is an Offence punishable by this Law And be it further Enacted by this present Parliament Stat. Sect. 18. Children departing the Realm That if the Children of any Subject within this Realm the said Children not being Soldiers Mariners Merchants or their Apprentices or Factors to prevent their good Education in England or for any other cause shall hereafter be sent or go beyond Seas without Licence of the Kings Majesty or six of his Honourable Privy Council whereof the principal Secretary to be one under their Hands and Seals The forfeiture of such as depart That then all and every such Child and Children so sent or which shall so go beyond the Seas shall take no benefit by any gift conveyance descent devise or otherwise of or to any Lands Tenements Hereditaments Leases Goods or Chattels until he or they being of the age of eighteén years or above take the Oath mentioned in an Act of Parliament made this present Session Intituled An Act for the better discovering and repressing of Popish Recusants before some Iustice of Peace of the County Liberty or Limit where such Parents of such Children as shall be so sent did or shall inherit and dwell And that in the mean time the next of his or her kin which shall be no Popish Recusant shall have and enjoy the said Lands Tenements Hereditaments Leases Goods and Chattels so given conveyed descended or devised until such time
Privy Council of your Highness your Heirs or Successors or by the Bishop of the Diocess if she be a Baroness or if she be under that Degrée by two Iustices of the Peace of the same County whereof one to be of the Quorum there to remain without Ball or Mainprize until she shall conform her self and come to Church and receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper unless the Husband of such Wife shall pay to the Kings Majesty his Heirs or Successors for the Offence of his said Wife for every month ten pounds of lawful money of England or else the third part in thrée parts to be divided of all his Lands and Tenements at the choice of the Husband whose Wife is so convicted as aforesaid for and during so long time as she remaining a Recusant convicted shall continue out of Prison during which time and no longer she may be at liberty What Conviction is here meant Stat. 23 Eliz. 1. Being lawfully convicted as a Popish Recusant That is upon Indictment at the Kings Suit or a popular Action or Information on the Statute of 23 Eliz. 1. or an Action of Debt at the Kings Suit alone according to the Statute of 35 Eliz. 1. 35 Eliz. 1. In which two last Cases the former Laws are somewhat altered by this Statute For by the former Laws if a person had been convicted of Recusancy any other way then by Indictment no more could have been demanded either by the King or Informer then for the months mentioned in the Information or Count And the penalty should not have run on in such Case For that the Statutes of 29 Eliz. 6. and 3 Jac. 4. 29 Eliz. 6. 3 Jac. 4. which appropriate the penalty to the King after Conviction intend no other Conviction then by Indictment as hath been there said Baron and seme But by this Statute if a popular Action or Information or an Action of Debt c. at the Kings Suit alone be brought against the Husband and Wife for the Recusancy of the Wife and Judgment be had against them the Husband shall not only pay for the time contained in the Information or Count but the Wife shall be imprisoned ever afterwards unless she conform or the Husband pay ten pounds per month or yield the third part of his Lands to the King And yet this Statute doth not after such Conviction of the Wife in a popular Suit Suits upon former Statutes not taken away or Action of Debt c. at the Kings Suit take away the popular Action or Information from the Informer or the Action of Debt c. from the King for the time to come but that they may be brought against the Husband and Wife for the Recusancy of the Wife for any month or months wherein she is absent from Church after such Conviction For this Statute and 23 Eliz. 1. and 35 Eliz. 1. Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 35 Eliz. 1 are all affirmative Laws and may well stand together so that any of the three remedies given by these Statutes may be pursued This Statute not abrogating any former Law but only providing another way of punishment for the Wife after she is once convicted Howbeit she shall not be punished by any more then one of these three ways Co. 11. 63 64. Rolles 1. 94. Doctor Fosters Case Cro. Pasch 17 Jac. 529. Parker versus Curson And therefore if the King bring an Action of Debt c. upon 35 Eliz. against the Husband and Wife Where the Wife shall not be imprisoned or the Informer sue them upon 23 Eliz. for any absence of the Wife from Church after she is once convicted by either of those ways and recover the Privy Counsellor Bishop or Justices of Peace here mentioned cannot imprison her by force of this Act for the non-payment of the ten pounds per month by the Husband for those months for which the King or Informer hath recovered or for his not yielding the thirds of his Lands to the King And the reason is for that when the Husband stands charged with the penalty of twenty pounds per month for the absence of the Wife the intent of the Act is satisfied in respect of those months of her absence for which he stands so charged For if he pay not the twenty pounds per month so recovered the King or Informer hath the ordinary remedy after Judgment by Process of Capias against them both both And the intent of the Act was no more then that the Husband should pay for the Recusancy of his Wife or the Wife be imprisoned And if in this Case the Privy Counsellor Bishop or Justices of Peace should have power to imprison the Wife unless the Husband would pay ten pounds for the months for which the King or Informer hath recovered it would follow that the Husband hath his Election whether he will pay ten pounds per month to the King by force of this Act or the twenty pounds per month so recovered against him by the King or Informer For he shall not pay both the one and the other for that were bis puniri pro uno delicto And if he shall have his Election the King or Informer might by this device be eluded of the penalty of twenty pounds per month so recovered which could not be the intent of the makers of this Law The King and Informer barred by her Imprisonment But if the Wife be after such Conviction imprisoned by force of this Act neither the King or Informer can so sue the Husband and Wife for the Recusancy of the Wife For she is already punished by this Act and must remain in Prison until the Husband pay the ten pounds for every month or yield the thirds of his Lands to the King or the Wife conforms Or if the Husband yields the thirds So if the Husband yields the thirds of his Lands to save his Wives imprisonment he is already punished by this Act and shall not again be punished or Sued by the King or Informer either upon 23 Eliz. or 35 Eliz. Or pay Ten pounds per month And if after such conviction of the Wife he pay Ten pounds per month to save her imprisonment he cannot be sued with his Wife for the Twenty pounds per month upon either of those Statutes by the King or Informer for those months of her absence from Church incurred after her conviction for which he hath paid the Ten pounds monthly to the King for he shall not Bis puniri pro uno delicto Hitherto hath been spoken of the Conviction of the Wife at the Suit of the King alone by Action of Debt c. or by the Informer Qui tam c. which doth not appropriate the penalty to the King by 29 Eliz. 6. or 3 Jac. 4. Conviction upon Indictment If the Wife be convicted of Recusancy upon an Indictment it hath been much debated whether that doth not so appropriate the
penalty of Twenty pounds per month to the King for the time to come by the said Statute of 29 Eliz. 6. and 3 Jac. 4. Stat. 29 Eliz. 6 3 Jac. 4. that the King cannot bring an Action of Debt or the Informer any popular Suit against the Husband and Wife for any offence of Recusancy committed by the Wife after such Conviction see for this Stat. 23 Eliz. cap. 1. 23 Eliz. 1 Sect. 9. and 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 6. However admitting they may yet now if the King take advantage of this Statute and the Wife be either Imprisoned or the Husband yields the third part of his Lands to the King there is no question but the King and Informer are both barred The King and Informer barred to sue for the Twenty pounds per month for any time incurred after her Conviction For the King hath made his Election to punish her this way and the Informer cannot sue her for she is punished already at the Suit of the King And if the Husband pay the Ten pounds per month the King and Informer are likewise barred for those months of her absence from Church incurred after her Conviction for which the Husband hath paid the Ten pounds monthly to the King for he shall not be twice punished for the same offence Of all his Lands and Tenements By Tenements Tenements what are to be understood Offices Rents Commons Profits apprender out of Lands Advowsons and the like wherein a man hath any Franktenement and whereof he is seized ut de libero tenemento for all these are included under the word Tenement as well as Lands and other Inheritances which are holden Co. 1. inst 6. Perkins Sect. 114 115. 11 H. 6. 22 Bro. Grant 143. Finch 130. Womans Lawyer lib. 3. 188. Anderson 2. 4. But Tenement extends not to a Chattel or Lease for years Bro. Done 41. Grant 87. Bulstrode 1. 101. Turpine against Forreyner So that the Husband need not yield to the King the third part of his Leases for years for the Recusancy of his Wife Shall continue out of Prison A married Woman Imprisonment of the Wife for other cause convicted as a Popish Recusant is after her Conviction and before any further prosecution or any Election made by the Husband whether he will pay the Ten pounds per month or yield the third part of his Lands imprisoned by process of Law or for some other Cause not relating to such Conviction and afterwards is set at Liberty It seems that the Husband shall not pay the Ten pounds per month for the time she was in Prison for the Act speaks only of the time during which she continues out of Prison and although she were not imprisoned for her Recusancy yet seeing she had not during such her Imprisonment the benefit intended to her in consideration of the Ten pounds per month or third part viz. her Liberty the Husband shall not for that time pay the penalty here appointed to save her Imprisonment but if he pay it for the time after she is set at Liberty that is sufficient to satisfie the intent of this Act. But if after such Conviction Covinous Imprisonment the Wife be imprisoned by Covin upon some pretence not relating to such Conviction that shall not save the Husbands payment of the Ten pounds per month for the time she was imprisoned but after she is set at Liberty she may be again Imprisoned by force of this Act unless the Husband pay the Ten pounds per month or satisfie to the King the third part of the profits of his Lands as well for the time of such covinous Imprisonment as for the future for the covinous Imprisonment was upon the matter her own Act and no person shall take advantage of an Imprisonment covinously caused by him or her self 16 E. 4. 5. And here she continued out of Prison in the sence of this Act because her Imprisonment was not by Process of Law in invitam Outlawry by Covin And so if a Man be Outlawed while he is in Prison yet the Outlawry shall not be avoided for that Cause if the Imprisonment were by Covin or consent of the party Outlawed Co. 1. Inst. 259. 38. Assiz Pl. 17. Stat. iii Car. i. cap. ii An Act to restrain the passing or sending of any to be Popishly bred beyond the Seas FOrasmuch as divers ill affected persons to the true Religion established within this Realm Stat. Sect. 1. have sent their Children into Forreign parts to be bred up in Popery notwithstanding the restraint thereof by the Statute made in the first year of the Reign of our late Soveraign Lord King James of famous memory Be it Enacted that the said Statute shall be put in due execution And be it further Enacted by the Kings most Excellent Majesty and the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same that in Case any person or persons under the Obedience of the King his Heirs and Successors He that goes himself or sends any other beyond the Seas to be trained up in Popery c. shall be disabled to sue c. and shall lose all his Goods and shall forfeit all his Lands c. for life at any time after the end of this Session of Parliament shall pass or go or shall convey or send or cause to be sent or conveyed any Child or other person out of any of the Kings Dominions into any the parts beyond the Seas out of the Kings Obedience to the intent and purpose to enter into or be resident or trained up in any Priory Abbey Nunnery Popish Vniversity Colledge or School or House of Iesuites Priests or in any private Popish Family and shall be there by any Iesuite Seminary Priest Friar Monk or other Popish Person instructed perswaded or strengthned in the Popish Religion in any sort to profess the same or shall convey or send or cause to be conveyed or sent by the hands or means of any person whatsoever any sum or sums of money or other thing for or towards the maintenance of any Child or other person already gone or sent or to go or to be sent and trained and instructed as is aforesaid or under the the name or colour of any Charity Benevolence or Alms towards the relief of any Priory Abbey Nunnery Colledge School or any Religious House whatsoever Every person so sending conveying or causing to be sent and conveyed as well any such Child or other person as any sum or sums of money or other thing and every person passing or being sent beyond the Seas being thereof Lawfully Convicted in or upon any Information Presentment or Indictment as is aforesaid shall be disabled from thenceforth to sue or use any Action Bill Plaint or Information in course of Law or to prosecute any Suit in any Court of Equity or to be Committée of any Ward or Executor or Administrator
32. Certificate See Bishop Certiorari Certificates in what cases how to be made and within what time 35. 37 38. 40 41. 60. 96 97. 100. 116. 119. 135. 145. 174. 183. 186. 201. 217. 249 250. 263. Certiorari What Courts may direct a Certiorari immediately to another Court and who must certifie 217. Where a Certiorari to certifie a Record shall be awarded de novo 217. Chattels Money secured upon a Mortgage is within the word Chattels 137. Children see Seas Church See Alien Ceremonies Conformity Ecclesiastical Iurisdiction Ornaments Recusants Where the repairing to Church must be to Morning and Evening Prayers both 190. How the party ought to behave himself there 27. He ought to continue there during Service and Sermon 27. The Penalty for not coming to Church 26. 59 60. 188 189. The party may be punished both for his monthly and weekly absence from Church 27. 190. The 12 d. for absence from Church is due and may be sued for as soon as the Sunday or Holy-day is over 27. 190. Not necessary to go to a mans Parish Church so he go to some other 27 28. Where the Ecclesiastical Court cannot judge what is a mans Parish Church 28. What is a Parish Church 118. The penalty for perswading others to forbear to come to Church 113 114. Church of England see King Cinque Ports The Warden of the Cinque Ports may take the Bond and minister the Oath of Allegiance to such as pass beyond Seas 198. He is not liable to the Penalties inflicted for not certifying them 198 199. Clerk of Assizes and Peace See Recusants Clergy See Ecclesiastical persons Clergy in what case to be allowed 183. Colledge see Seminaries Commission See Courts Ecclesiastical Iurisdiction King Where a Recusants Lands are upon his death to be discharged of the seizure a Commission shall issue to inquire 111. Common Prayer See Baron Feme Iudgment What form of Common Prayer is injoined by the Laws in force what not 21. 32. The penalty on the Minister who useth not or depraveth the Common Prayer or useth any other open Prayers 20 21 22 22 24. What Ministers are there meant 21. What open Prayers are excepted 21. The penalty for depraving the Common Prayer or hindering it to be said or procuring or maintaining any other open Prayers 24 25 26. Hearing of Mass is a maintaining within the Statute 24 25. Concealers Concealers of offenders and offences where punishable 51. 55 56. 59. Confirmation Whose confirmation of a Lease by the incumbent is necessary 228. 230. Conformity and Submission See Baron Feme Bishop Indictments Informations Relapse Sacrament Seminaries What is Conformity 129. Conformity where it discharges the penalties for Recusancy 28. 68 69. 147 148. Where Conformity for some part of the time shall not excuse the offender 61 62. Conformity will not help him upon 1 Eliz. 2.27 What is a Conformity and Submission before Judgment 69. Conformity before the Bishop how to be made and where pleadable 69. Conformity after Judgment will now discharge the Recusant of all penalties 148. The Recusants Remedies upon his Conformity as to the King and Informer 148. Conformity of the Husband of a Popish Recusant convict 212. In what cases Conformity is necessary before an Indictment Utlawry c. for Recusancy can be avoided or reversed and where not 179 180 181. Where the Recusants Conformity shall discharge the Arrears of the 20 l. per month and where not 108 109. The profits taken before Conformity not restorable 109. Where the Conformity of the heir of a Recusant shall discharge the Arrears incurred in the Ancestors life time and where not 148 149 150. Conformity and Submission by such as return from any Seminary c. 91 92. 154 155. 258 259. Submission by a Jesuit Popish Priest c. 94 95. Oaths and Submissions upon 27 El. 2. where to be certified 97. The penalty for not certifying 97. Submission by a person reconciled to the Pope or See of Rome 186. In what case submission is not available 187. What Conformity and Submission discharges the offender against 35 Eliz. 1. of Conventicles 115 116 117 118. Who may require it 115. And within what time 116. The penalty for refusing to make it 116 117. In what cases it must be made in some Parish Church 117 118. What is a Parish Church 118. The form of the Submission 118 119. It must be registred and certified to the Bishop 119. What Conformity and Submission discharges the offender against 35 Eliz. 2. of Popish Recusants confined 135. Who may require it 135. And within what time 135. 137 138. The penalty for refusing to make it 135. It must be made in some Parish Church 143 144. The form of the Submission 144 145. It must be registred and certified to the Bishop 145. Two several submissions required 144. Conventicles See Conformity Conviction The penalty for going to Conventicles or perswading others so to do 113 114. Conviction See Baron Feme Indictments Informations Recusants What is meant by Conviction 61. 216. 252. Conviction of Recusants c. before whom 65 66 67. 84 85. 100 101. 108. 162. Where to be certified 100. What is a sufficient conviction of the Recusant within 23 Eliz. 1.60 What is a good conviction of the Recusant upon Proclamation and default and what not 163. How to be convicted upon Proclamation c. 107. 162. Where by Recusants convict shall not be intended Recusants convict upon Proclamation c. 165. Conviction upon Proclamation c. is no Judgment nor shall operate as a Judgment 69. 108 109 110. 152 153. 165. What Conviction is sufficient upon 35 Eliz. 1. of Conventicles 115. Copulative Where a Copulative shall be taken for a Disjunctive 184. Copyholds Whether Copyhold Lands may be forfeited for Recusancy 106 107. Where they shall not pass by general words 106. To whom to be forfeited by 35 Eliz. 2. 133. Coroner Where the Coroner may give the Oath of Abjuration 135. 138 139. Corporations What offences Mayors and other Head Officers of Corporations may hear and determine and in what manner 29 30. Corruption of Blood Where there shall be no corruption of blood 42. 124. 194. Costs see Informers Covin See Informations Covin shall not bar the King 79. 105 106. A man becomes a Popish Recusant convict by Covin how it shall operate 228. Covinous grant of an Advowson by a Popish Recusant shall not bar the University of their presentment 231. Where the Covin must be averred and found by the Jury 228. 231. Imprisonment of the Feme by Covin shall not avoid the payment of the 10 l. per month during such imprisonment 255 256. Imprisonment by Covin shall not avoid an Utlawry 256. Councel see Praemunire Privy Councel What offences are to be disclosed or signified to the Privy Councel or some or one of them 51. 55 56. 96 97. What Privy Councellors may grant a Licence to go beyond the Seas 94. 155. 224. A Popish Recusant may
go out of the compass of five miles if required to appear before the Privy Councel 141. Three Privy Councellors may grant him a Licence to travel out of that compass 206 207 208. The nature of such Licence 207 208. The Privy Councel may send for a Popish Recusant confined to come to Court 201. To whom Privy Councellors are to give the Oath of Allegiance 195 196 197. 242. 245 246 247. They may commit the party to Prison for refusing it 250. Where a Privy Councellor may commit a married Noble woman convicted as a Popish Recusant and where not 252 253. County See Iustices of Peace Trial. Court see Recusants Courts See Certiorari Ecclesiastical Courts Informers Iustices Courts of Record what Courts are meant 82 83. 85. What Courts are the Kings Courts 142. In what Courts the King may sue for the penalties given him by 23 Eliz. 1. 122. Court of Kings Bench. See Informers Marshalsie The Justices of the Kings Bench are the Soveraign Justices of Oyer and Terminer and Goal-delivery 66. What offences they may hear and determine 35 36. 94. 188. 193 194. 258. To whom they may give the Oath of Supremacy 261 262. To whom they may tender and give the Oath of Allegiance 251. 261 262. Court of Exchequer see Exchequer High Commission Court Taken away by Act of Parliament 8. Cura animarum A Donative may be cum Cura animarum 233. A Deanry Archdeaconry Prebend are not Benefices with cure of Souls 233. Custom Custom for the Wife to have a part of the husbands goods where in force 222. Day FRactions of a day rejected in Law 198. Death see Recusants Default See Appearance Conviction Denizen Who 128. Naturalization includes Denization 128 129. Deprivation See Notice Pardon Deprivation ipso facto 12. 22 23. Sentence declaratory by the Ecclesiastical Judge where not necessary 22 23. Where a sentence of Deprivation by the Ecclesiastical Judge ought not to be questioned by the temporal Judge 31. Deputy see Officers Deputy Lieutenant see Licences Dignities Ecclesiastical see Cura animarum Disability See Plea Recusants A Popish Recusant convict is disabled as a person Excommunicate 193. 215 216. 223. Is disabled to sue 215 216 217 218 219 220. Such Disability is but quousque c. 216. Disabled to bear office 211 212. To be Executor 212. 234 235. Or Administrator 212. 234 235. Or Guardian 234. To be a witness 216. Or surety for the good behaviour 64. To present or nominate to a Benefice or Donative or to grant the next avoidance 226 227 228 229. Where disabled to be Tenant by the Courtesie 220. Or to have Dower 220. Or Jointure 220 221. Or any Goods by Custom 212 213. 220. 222. The Husband of a Popish Recusant convict where disabled to bear Office 211 212. A Recusant convict to what intents disabled 211. Disabilities inflicted on such as go beyond Seas without Licence 223 224. Or educate their Children in the Popish Religion or are so educated 264. Or send any person beyond Seas to be so educated or are so sent 257 258. Or who refuse the Oath of Supremacy 10. 43 44. Or the Oath of Allegiance 243. 251. Or execute any Office without taking the Oaths and Test injoined by 25 Car. 2.2.263 264. Discharge See Conformity Indictments Seizure Discontinuance see Informations Discovery See Iustices of Peace The reward of him who discovers the entertainer or reliever of a Jesuite or Popish Priest or Mass to have been said c. 200 201. To whom and within what time the discovery must be made 200 201. How the Reward shall be recovered 201. Disjunctive Where a Disjunctive shall be taken for a Copulative 184. Dispensation Dispensation by the King where void 44.243 Distribution see Penalty Donative See Recusants A Donative may be cum cura animarum 233. Dower See Baron Feme Dower in what cases saved 43.124 194. Where a woman shall be disabled to have any Dower 220. Ecclesiastical Courts and Iurisdiction See Church Deprivation Heresie King Parish FOrraign Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction abrogated 4 5. The Ecclesiastical Judge ought not to usurp upon the Temporal Law 6. The nature of his offence if he so usurps 6. The Queen might grant Commissions for the exercise of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction 7 8. And that without the aid of 1 Eliz. 1.8 Archbishops and Bishops shall punish absence from Church and other offences against 1 Eliz. 2. by Ecclesiastical Censures 28. 30. Ecclesiastical Court not restrained by 1 Eliz. 2.31 Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction saved to Archbishops Bishops c. 88. 194. 239. Ecclesiastical Laws see Laws Ecclesiastical Persons See Common Prayer Clericus what it implies 21. Every Priest or Minister is Clericus 45. Election See Executors King Enquiry See Iustices What is meant by Enquire 68. Equity see Statutes Examination see Iustices of Peace Error see Alien Exchequer Principal Officers of the Court of Exchequer who 71. Principal Officers of the Receipt of Exchequer who 71. Excommengement See Recusants Where the Sheriff or other Officer may break the House to take one Excommunicated for Recusancy 193. Recusant Excommunicate i. e actually Excommunicate 223. Excommunication cannot be pleaded by the Bishop who Excommunicated the party and the reason of it 217 218. A person Excommunicate cannot sue as Executor or Administrator 218. Executors See Excommengement The offender hath his Election to pay the Forfeiture or be imprisoned and dies Quaere whether his Executors shall be charged 25 26. A man grants the Administration of his Goods and Chattels to J. S. thereby J. S. is made Executor 235. Who is disabled to be an Executor 212. 234 235. 258. 263. Failer of Records WHere Judgment shall be given on Failer of the Record 217 Where the not having the Record at the day shall be no Failer of the Record 217. Felony 90 91. 117. 139 140. 181 182 183. 194. See Vniversity Feme see Baron Feme Fine see Iustices Forfeiture See Abjuration Baron Feme Copyholds Penalty Recusants Forfeiture how a gift in Law 232. Forfeiture given without saving to whom shall be to the King 61. 70. Forfeiture in a Praemunire 46. 152. Forfeiture for Treason 152. Forfeiture of Lands generally shall not include intailed Lands 46. 152. Forraign see Iurisdiction Fraud See Covin Recusants Fraudulent Conveyances void 86 87. 99 100. 105. 231. Gaol see Imprisonment Goods See Seizure What is included within the word Goods 105. Grants by the King see King Grants by a Recusant See Covin Recusants Guardian See Kin. Recusants Who is disabled to be a Guardian 234. 263. Who shall be Guardian where the Recusant is disabled so to be 234 235. Heir Where there shall be no disherison of the Heir 42. 124. 194. Where the Conformity of the Heir of a Recusant shall discharge the arrears incurred in the Ancestors life time and where not 148 149 150. Hereditament What passes by Hereditament 106. 171 172. Heresie What the Ecclesiastical Commissioners might adjudge to be Heresie 16. What shall not be deemed Heresie or
his Warrant to bring the party before him 246. But the house cannot be broken by virtue of such Warrant 246. To whom one Justice of Peace may tender or give the Oath of Allegiance 224. 245 246. 247 248 249. Where he may commit the party refusing it 250. To what Justice of Peace the person offering an Agnus Dei c. must be brought or his name disclosed 53 54. The Justice of Peace not declaring the same incurs a Praemunire 55 56. Next Justice of Peace who meant 54. Certificate of Recusancy to be made by a Justice of Peace 60. One Justice of Peace may take the submission of a Jesuite or Popish Priest 95. He may examine a person suspected to be such and commit him if he refuse to answer 140 141. Discovery of a Jesuite or Popish Priest to a Justice of Peace 96. What the Justice of Peace is to do thereupon 96. The penalty if he neglects so to do 96. What Certificate he shall have for his discharge 96 97. Discovery of the entertainer or reliever of a Jesuite or Popish Priest or of Masse said must be to a Justice of Peace 200. One Justice of Peace may require the submission on 35 Eliz. 1. of Conventicles 115. And may require the offender to abjure 115 116. One Justice of Peace may require the submission on 35 Eliz. 2. of Popish Recusants confined 135. One Justice of Peace may cause the 12 d. per Sunday to be levied for absence from Church 188 189. Within what time the party must be called into question 189. Where the Justice of Peace is sole Judge of the parties excuse 190. One Justice of Peace may give the Oath to a Popish Recusant confined by 35 Eliz. 2. 210 211. Any two Justices of Peace may take the submission of a person returning from a Seminary 91 92. And of a person reconciled to the Pope or See of Rome 186. And minister to him the Oaths of Supremacy and Allegiance 186. Where they must certifie the Oaths so taken 186. To what other persons any two Justices of Peace may give the Oath of Allegiance 243. They may require the offender against 35 Eliz. 2. of Popish Recusants to abjure and may give him the Oath of Abjuration 135. Where they may imprison him who keeps the Arms of a Popish Recusant Convict or hinders their delivery and where not 237 238 239. To whom two Justices of Peace Quorum unus c. may tender and give the Oath of Allegiance 174. 196 197 198. 245 246. 249 250. Where they must certifie the taking of it to the Sessions 174. 249 250. And commit such as refuse to take it 174 175. 250. They have their Election to commit the party to the Assizes or Sessions 175. Where they may imprison a married woman convicted as a Popish Recusant and where not 252 253 254. Four Justices of Peace may grant a Licence to a Popish Recusant to travel beyond five miles 206 207 208 209 210 211. And no less then four 208. Where four Justices of Peace by warrant at their Sessions may seize a Popish Recusants Arms and where not 237 238. What arms they may allow Popish Recusants to have 237. The power of the Justices of Peace in their Sessions revived in the case of Recusancy 66 67. 101. 162. They may now proceed there to convict the Recusant upon Proclamation and default 108. 162. At what Sessions they may hear and determine Recusancy 67. In what case they are to discharge the Recusant 68 69. They may at their Sessions give the Oath of Abjuration on 35 Eliz. 1. of Conventicles 116. And must record and certifie it 116. Where upon Conviction before them they are to give a Certificate to the discoverer of the offender 201. Popish Recusants are to be presented at the Sessions of the Peace 160 161. The Presentments are to be entred and recorded there 161. To whom the Justices of Peace in their Sessions are to minister the Oath of Supremacy 262. 264. 266 267. And the Oath of Allegiance 262. 264. 266 267. They are to tender the said Oath at their Sessions to such as have before refused it 175. 250. And are to commit Women Covert till they take it 175. 250. They may there tender it to any of competent age and under the degree of Nobility 175 176. 196. Kin. In what case and how long the next of Kin shall have the Lands and Goods of him who goes beyond Seas without Licence 224 225. Whether he shall have the Lands or only the profits 225. In whom the state of the Land vests 225. The Mother of Kin to the Child and shall be preferred before the Brother or Sister 224 225. Next of Kin or Blood shall be accounted as in the case of a purchase 225. Jus Propinquitatis Jus Representationis 225. Where the next of Kin shall be Guardian and where not 234 235. King See Advowson Baron Feme Courts Forfeiture Informations Pardon The King is the supream Head of the Church of England 2. 5 6 7. Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction restored to the Crown 5. The Kings ancient Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction 5 6. The King is Persona mixta unita cum Sacerdotibus 6. He is the supream Ordinary 6 7. He is Arbitrator between spiritual Persons touching their Jurisdiction 6. He may do what the Pope might by the Canon Law 6 7. He may grant a Commission of Review notwithstanding 25 H. 8. 19. 7. He may make an Appropriation without the Bishop 7. A resignation made to him of a Deanry good 7. The Penalty for perswading others to impugne his power in cases Ecclesiastical 113 114. He cannot be nonsuited 80. Covin shall not bar him 79. 105 106. An Audita Querela lies not against him 148. King where it includes his Successors 95. Who is a mans natural King 185. Within what time the King is to prosecute upon poenal Laws 74 75. 121 122. Where he is barred of the Forfeiture and where not 79. 81 82. 253 254 255. The Recusants remedy upon his Conformity as to the King 148. Where the King may pardon release c. the Forfeiture upon a poenal Law and where not 80. How he may grant a Recognisance or Obligation forfeited 106. He cannot grant the Penalty on a poenal Law to a Subject 165. Action of Debt c. given to the King 120. In what Courts the King may sue for the Penalties given him by 23 El. 1. 122. Where the Penalty for Recusancy shall run on and be appropriated to the King and where not 102 103 104. 166 167 168. 219. 252. 254. The King may seize two thirds of a Recusants Lands presently after Conviction 168. Election given to the King to take the 20 l. per month or two thirds of a Recusants Lands 170 171. 173. 219. But he shall not have the two parts and the 20 l. per month both 219. Where the King having seized an Advowson as part of his two parts shall present and not the
be granted to a Popish Recusant convict 234. The penalty on a Popish Recusant convict who comes to Court 201 202. Or departs not out of London and ten miles compass 202 203. Tradesmen and dwellers in and about London not excepted at this day 203 204. The penalties on a married woman who is a Popish Recusant convict and conforms not in her Husbands life time 86. 212 213 214. 252 253. Refusal See Abjuration Conformity Oaths Relapse Makes the submission void 119. 145. Where to be certified 145 Relation See Indictments Recusants Release see King Relief See Aide Seminary Relieving of offenders where not punishable 17. 44. Religion see Rome Rent see Recusants Repeal See Statutes Of two branches of 35 Eliz. 1. 191. Of a branch of 35 Eliz. 2. 205. Replication see Plea Resignation see King Reversal see Vtlawry Review see King Reviver see Statutes Reward See Discovery Recusants Rites see Ceremonies Rome Pope Popish Religion c. See Books Bulls Great Exactions by the See of Rome 1. Maintaining or Extolling the Bishop or See of Romes Authority where a Praemunire and where Treason 34. 41 42. What is a maintaining or extolling within 5 Eliz. 1. 34. 42. Withdrawing the Kings Subjects from the Religion Established to the Romish Religion or being so withdrawn is High Treason 57 58. 184 185 186. Reconciled to the Pope or See of Rome what meant 187. Reconciling or being reconciled to the Pope or See of Rome is High Treason 49 50. 57 58. 184 185 186. A person so reconciled and submitting afterwards 186. What reconciliation to Rome is not within 13 Eliz. 2. 50. Sacrament See Baptism Informations Offices The penalty on the Popish Recusant who after Conformity receives not the Sacrament of the Lords Supper yearly 157 158. Where a married woman may be punished for not receiving the said Sacrament during her Marriage and where not 195. 212 213. 252. Persons to be restored in Blood or to be naturalized must receive the said Sacrament and when 240. What other persons are to receive it 211 212. 215. 263 264. 266. Saving See Power Péers Pensions Schisme see Heresie Schoolmaster The penalty for keeping or being a Schoolmaster contrary to 23 Eliz. 1. or 1 Jac. 4. 64. 155. By whom a Schoolmaster is to be licenced 64 65. 155. What may be taken for such Licence 65. Conformity or allowance by the Bishop or Ordinary either of them sufficient 64. What a Schoolmaster must do by Stat. 14. Car. 2. 64 65. An Usher is within the word Schoolmaster 64. Scire facias see Informations Scotland See Alien Laws Seas See Councel Kin. Seminary The penalties for suffering Women or Children to go beyond Seas without Licence and on such as go or send them 94. 155. 223 224. 226. Seizure See Advowson Commission King Office Where a Recusants Lands may be seized or the seizure continued after his death and where not 100. 102. 104. 106 107. 109 110 111 112. 150 151 152 153. 168 169. 170 171. Where his Goods may be seized and where not 100 102. 105. 168. 172. Seminary Popish Colledge c. Iesuite Popish Priest c. See Conformity Discovery Iustices of Peace It s High Treason for a Jesuit Seminary Priest c. to be within this Realm 90. Not necessary to shew in what particular place he was born 90. Nor where ordained 90. Relieving or maintaining such is Felony at this day 90 91. The penalty for not discovering a Jesuit or Popish Priest 96. Or for not giving Information of such discovery 96. A person suspected to be a Jesuit or Seminary Priest examined and refusing to answer 140. To whom examinable 140. By what questions he is bound by 35 Eliz. 2. to answer 141. Submission by a Jesuit Popish Priest c. 94 95. He must continue in Obedience to the Laws 95. They which are in Seminaries c. shall return upon Proclamation made in that behalf 91 92. If they return and submit not 't is High Treason 92. They ought not to come into any other of the late Queens Dominions before they have submitted here 92. Where the benefit of submission was lost if the party submitting came within ten miles of the Court 98. The penalty for sending Children to a Popish Colledge Seminary or Family beyond the Seas 153. 257 258. And on such who go thither 153 154. 257 258. Or relieve any there or any Popish Colledge Seminary c. 93 94. 257 258. Sentence see Deprivation Service See Trial. Divine Service see Recusants Where serving or going to serve a forraign Prince c. without first taking the Oath of Allegiance and entring into Bond is Felony 181 182. see Oaths What kind of service is meant 182. The form of such Bond 183. It must be Domino Regi 182. Who shall take it 183. 198. Who shall certifie it and the penalty for not certifying 183 184. Where a man may keep a Recusant in his Service and where not and the penalty 191 192 193. Sessions See Iustices of Peace At what Sessions a Recusant may be indicted 67. General Quarter Sessions and General or Quarter Sessions what Sessions meant 67. Sheriff See Excommengement Sheriffs shall take the Oath of Supremacy 38. Sheriff of the County where the Kings Bench is 40. Where a Recusant proclaimed ought to render his body to the Sheriff 107. 162 163. Where a Popish Recusant may travel above five miles if required to tender his body to the Sheriff 142. The Sheriff is to pay him who discovers certain offenders 201. Statutes See Baron Feme Ieofailes Informations Notice Recital Repeal Reviver of several Statutes of H. 8. and E. 6. 2 3 4. Stat. 5 Eliz. 1. when and where to be published 43. The Statutes of 23 Eliz. 1. 29 Eliz. 6. 35 Eliz. 1. and 7 Jac. 6. against Recusants are all affirmative Laws and do not abrogate one the other 120 121. 162 163. 253. Who are within the Act of 35 Eliz. 1. of Conventicles and who not 114. Rules in construction of poenal Statutes 21 22. 64. 221. Where they shall not be construed by Equity 199. 221. 229. Where they may be construed by the intent of the makers besides or beyond the letter 21. 229. What is given by an Act of Parliament shall not be devested by a subsequent Act without express words 23◠Where a later Act of Parliament shall be guided by a former 85. A private clause in a general Act of Parliament 230. The difference between a Statute discontinued and revived and a Statute never discontinued 125 126. All men are bound to take notice of an Act of Parliament 23. Statutes of West 2. c. 1. De donis conditionalibus 46. 152 153. West 2. c. 5. of Advowsons 13. 2 E. 3. c. 3. of Armour 97. 25 E. 3. c. 22. of Provisors of Abbeys 46. 25 E. 3. of Provisors of Benefices 229. 50 E. 3. c. 6. of Fraudulent deeds 87. 16 R. 2. c. 5. of Praemunire 6. 46. 152. 2 H. 5. c. 3. of Jurors 136