apparant of the King of England and of such a King who is heir unto the said Prince Edward And such a first begotten son and heir apparant to the Crown shall inherit the said Dukedom in the life of the said King his father with manner of limitation of estate was short excellent and curious varying from the ordinary Rules of the Common Law touching the framing of any estate of inheritance in fee-simple or fee-tail And neverthelesse by the authority of Parliament a speciall fee-simple iâ— in that onely case made as by judgment may appear in the Book aforesaid and the case thereof fol. 27. and 21 E. 3. 41. b. And ever since that creation the said Dukedom of Cornwall hath been the peculiar inheritance of the Kings eldest son ad supportandum nomen onus bonoris to support the name and weight of that his honourable estate during the king his fathers life so that he is ever Duxnatus non creatus a Duke born not created and the said Duke the very first day of his nativity is presumed and taken to be of full and perfect age so that he may sue that day for his livery of the said Dukedom and ought of right to obtain the same as well as if he had been full 21 yeers of age And the said Black-Prince was the first Duke in England after the Conquest for though Bracton who made his Book in H. 3. saith Et sunt sub regâ—duces as before appeareth yet that place is to be understood of the ancient kings who were before the conquest for in Mag. Charta which was made in Anno 9 H. 3. we finde not the name of Duke amongst the Peers and Nobles there mentioned For seeing the Norman Kings themselves were Dukes of Normandy for a great while they adorned none with this honour of Duke And the eldest son of every King after this creation was Duke of Cornwall and so allowed As for example Henry of Munmouth eldest son of H. 4. and Henry of Winsoâ— eldest son of H. 5. and Edw. of Westminster the first son of Ed. 4. and Arthur of Winchester first son of H. 7. and Edward of Hampton first son of H. 8. but Richard of Burdeaux who was the first son of the Black-Prince was not Duke of Cornwall by force of the said creation for albeit after the death of his father he was heir apparant to the Crown yet because he was not the first begotten son of a King of England for his father dyed in the life time of king Ed. 3. the said Richard was not within the limitation of the grant and creation by authority of Parliament made in the 11 yeer of king Edward above mentioned And therefore to supply that defect in the 5. yeer of Ed. 3. he was created Duke of Cornwall by a speciall Charter Elizabeth eldest daughter to king Edw. 4. was not Dutches of Cornwal for she was the first begotten daughter of king Edw. 4. but the limitation is to the first begotten son Henry the 8. was not in the life of his father king H. 7. after the death of his eldest Brother Arthur Duke of Cornwall by force of the said creation for albeit he was sole heir apparant to the king yet he was not his eldest begotten son Cooks 8 part 29. b. and 30. a. And the opinion of Stamford a learned Judge hath been that he shall have within his Dukedom of Cornwall the kings Prerogatives because it is not severed from the Crown after the form as it is given for none shall be inheritour thereof but the kings of the Realm For example whereas by the Common Law if a man hold divers Mannors or other lands and toâ—ements of severall Lords all by knights service some part by priority and ancient Feoffment and other lands by posterity and by a latter Feoffment and the Tenant so seized dyeth his son and heir within age In this case the custody of Wardship of the body and his marriage may not be divided among all the Lords but one of them onely shall have right unto it because the body of a man is intire and the Law doth say That the Lord of whom some part of those lands be holden by priority and by the same tenure of Chivalry shall have it except the king be any of the Lords for them though the Tenant did purchase that land last yet after his death the king shall bee preâ—erred before all or any other the Lords of whom the Tenant did hold by priority And so shall the Duke of Cornwall in the same case have the same Prerogative if his Tenant dye holding of him but by posterity of Feoffment for any tenure of his Dutchie of Cornwall although the said Duke is not seized of any particular estate whereof the reversion remaineth in the king for the Prince is seized in fee of his Dukedom as before is said Iohn of Gaunt the fourth son of king Edward 3. did take to wife Blanch who was daughter and heir to Henry Duke of Lancaster who had issue Henry afterwards king of England so that the said Dutchy of Lancaster did come unto the said Henry by discent from the part of his mother and being a subject he was to observe the Common Law of the Land in all things concerning his Dutchie For if he would depart in Fee with any part thereof hee must make livery and seizen or if hee had made a Lease for life reserving rent with a reentery for default of payment and the rent happen to be behind the Duke might not enter unlesse hee doe make a demand or if he had aliened any part thereof whilest he was with age hee might defeat the purchaser for that cause and if hee would grant a reversion of any estate for life or yeares in being there must also be Attornment or else the grant doth not take effect But after that hee had deposed King Richard the second and had assumed upon him the Royall estate and so had conjoyned his naturall bodie in the bodie Politique of the King of this Realme and so was become King Then the possessions of the Duchie of Lancaster were in him as King and not as Duke For the name of Duke being not so great as the name of a King was drowned by the name of King and by the State Royall in him who was Duke for the King cannot bee a Duke within his owne Realme but out of his Realme hee may And likewise the name of the Duchie and all the Franchizes Liberties and Jurisdictions of the same when they were in the hands of him who had the Crowne and Jurisdiction Royall were gone by thâ— Common Law and extinct for the greater doth distinguish the lesse and after those times the possessions of the Dutchie of LANCASTER would not passe from King Henry the fourth but by his Letters Patents under the great Seal of England without livery of seifin and without Attornment and if he make a Lease for life being Duke
of dignity and the Entry of Capias alias plures was according to the said originall but in the Exigent and Proclamation and in the Entry of it the Defendant was named according to his degree of Dignity upon a Writ of Errour after judgment doubt was if this might be amended in another Court then where the originall was made and at last it was resolved by all the Court that the Record should be amended by the Cursitor and made according to the Note or Title delivered unto him by the Plaintiffes Attorney Cook 8. part fol. 15. b. It appeareth in our Book of Law that the highest and lowest Dignity are uniuersall For as if a King of a Forreign Nation come into England by leave of the King of this Realm as it ought to be in this case he shall sue and be sued in the name of a King 11. Ed. 3. Test Breccon 473. So shall he sue or be sued by the Name of a Knight whersoever he received that degree of Dignity 20. Ed. 4. 6. H. 6. 14. but otherwise it is as if a Duke Marquesse Earl or other Title of Honour given by any Forreign King yea though the King by Letters Pattents of safe conduct do name him Duke or by any other his forreign Title of Dignity For experience sheweth that Kings joyned in league together by a certain mutuall anâ— as it were a Naturall power of Monarchs according to the Law of Nations have denized one anothers subjects and Ambassadors graced with this title of Honour Therefore though a Knight receive his Dignitie of a Forraigne Prince he is so to be stiled in all Legall proceedings within England Vide Cooke 7. part fol. 16. b. And Kings were wont to send their sonnes to their Neighbour Princes to receive Knighthood at their hands Vide Selden fol. 331. 308. thinking that it was more honourable to take Armes of some other lest affection might seeme to prevent judgement when the father gave them that honour Thus was our King H. 2. sent unto David King of Scots and Malcombe also king there sent unto our H. 2. and our king to the king of Castile to take of them Military or Civill Armes for the tearmes and phrases they used in that age for the making of a knight Vide Camden 174. 8. vide Selden fol. 315. And knights in all forraigne Countries have ever place and precedencie according as they are ancient knights which priviledge is deemed to Noblemen for be they never so ancient in forraigce Countries they shall goe before as Puesneys The degree of knighthood is not onely a Dignitie and honour to the party for so it is termed in Brooke title Additions fol. 44. but honourable for the kingdome and therefore it hath been an ancient Prerogative of the kings of this Realm at their pleasure to compell men of worth to take upon them this degree upon the payment of a Fine as appeareth in Ann. 7. H. 6. 15. Fitzh Abridg. tit Im. 12. and by the Statute a. 1. Ed. 2. de militibus But we see by experience in these daies that none are compelled thereunto and that is the reason wherefore if the Plaintiffe be made knight hanging the Writ it shall abate because hâ— hath changed his name and that by his owne act Vide Cooke 7. part f. 27. b. part 10. b. 1 Ed. 6. cap. 7. contrary And for that cause also by the common Law not only the king but every Lord of a Manor ought to have of every of his tenants a reasonable fine to make his eldest son knight Vide Bracton fol. 36. b. and all lands are subject to these aides except onely ancient Demeasnes and grand and petty serjeantly tenures as the Law hath been anciently delivered Vide Fiszh Nat. bre f. 83. a. and Selden f. 13. where it is also said one that wrote a little after the statute of West the first allowes as a good barre to the avowry for the tenant to plead that the father himself is no knight so that one not knighted cannot claime the aide of his own Tenants Briton de Prises de Avers And it was not at the liberty of the Lord to make more or lesse of his Tenants by the common Law in this case but by the statute at Westminster 1. cap. 35. it is put into certainty viz. forasmuch as before this time reasonable and to make one son knight or to marry his daughter was never put into certainty nor how much should be taken at that time whereby some levyed unreasonable aide and more often then seemed necessary whereby the people were sore grieved And it is therefore provided that from henceforth a whole knights fee be taken but 20. s. and of more more and of lesse lesse after that rate and that none shall levie such aide to make his son knight untill the sonne be 15. yeares of age nor to marry his daughter untill she be of the age of 7. yeares and of that there shall be mention made in the kings Writs formed on the same if any one will demand it and if it happen that the Father after he had leavied any such aid of his Tenants did before he hath marryed his Daughter the Executors of the Father shall be bound to the daughter for so much as the Father received for the Aid And if the Fathers goods be not sufficient his heir shall be charged therwith unto the daughter and this Heir is so incident that although the Lord do confirm unto the Tenant to hold by fealty and certain Rent and release unto him all other services and demands yet he shall have the aid to make his eldest Son Knight Anno 40. E. 3. f. 22. Finches book 24. but the King was not bound by the statute beforementioned because the King was not named in that statute and therfore by the statute 25. E. 3. cap. 11. The Kings aids were brought to a like value Selden fol. 3. 30. The intention of the Law is that an heir within the age of 21. years is not able to do Knight-service till his full age of 21. years Littleton lib. 2. cap. 4. f. 22. But such a presumption of Law doth give place to a judgment and proof to the contrary as Bracton saith Sabilitur presumptioni donec probetur in contrarium And therfore the King who is the Sovereign and Supream Judge of Chivalry hath dubbed him Knight he by this hath judged him able to do him Knight-service and all men concluded not to say to the contrary therfore such an heir being made Knight either in the life of his Father or afterwards during his minority shall be out of ward and custody both for Lands and for his body or marriage by the ancient common Law by reason also that the Honour of Knight-hood is so great that it is not to be holden under by any yet if the King do create any such an Heir within Age a Duke or Marquesse Earl Count Viscount or Baron by this
reserving a rent with reentry for default of payment and after his assumption of the Crown the rent happen to be unpaid he might re-enter without demand for the King is not bound to do such personall Ceremonies as the Subjects are by the Law compelled to do Therfore to have the said Dutchy to be still a Dutchy with the liberties to the same as it was before and to alter the order degree of the lands of the Dutchy from the Crown the said King H. 4. made a Charter by authority of Parliament which is intituled Charta Regis Henrici quarti de seperatione ducatus Lancastria a corona authoritate Parliamenti anno Regni sui primo The Charter of Henry the fourth for the separation of the Dutchy of Laucaster from the Crowne by the authority of Parliament in the first yeâ—r of his raign of the said King as by the tenure thereof may appear And so by authority of Parliament the said Dutchy withall the Franchises and liberties were disjoyned from the Crown and from the Ministers and Officers of the Crown and from the receit of the revenues of the Crown and from the order to passe by conveyance which the said Law did require in the possessions of the Crown But although the possessions of the Dutchy by force of the said Statute stood divided from the Crown and ought to be demeaned and ordered and passe as they ought before Henry the fourth was King yet there is no clause set down in the said Charter which doth make the person of the king who hath the Dutchy in any other degree then it was before but things concerning his person shall in the same estate as they were before seperations Insomuch as if the Law before the Charter by the authority of Parliament adjudged the person of the King alwayes of full age having regard unto his gifts as well of the lands which he doth inherit in his naturall body as in that he doth inherit in the right of his Crown or politique body it shall be so adjudged for the Dutchy land after the said Statute for the Statute doth go and reach unto the estate condition and order of the lands of the Dutchy but doth not extend to the person of the king who hath the lands in points touching his person neither doth it diminish or alter the preheminences which the Law doth give or attribute to the person of the King For if king Henry 4. after the said Act had made a 〈◊〉 or other grant of parcell of the Dutchy by the 〈◊〉 of H. Duke of Lancaster onely it had been void for it should have been made in the name of Henry 4. king of England And thus stood the Dutchy of Lancaster severed from the Crown all the raign of H. 5. and H. 6. being politiquely made for the upholding of the Dutchy of Lancaster their true and ancient inheritance howsoever the right heir uuto the Crown might in future time obtain his right thereunto as it happened in king Edward 4. his time But after king Edward 4. obtained his right unto the Crown of England and was in his remitter he in Parliament attainted H. 6. and appropriated unity and annexed the said Dutchy again unto the Crown of England as by the Statute thereof made in the first yeer of his Raign may appear By which Statute three things were ordained 1. First the County Palatine of Lancaster was again established 2. Secondly he did vest it in the body politique of the kings of this Realm 3. Thirdly he did divide it from the order of the crown-Crown-lands and in this force it did continue untill the time of H. 7. who forthwith being descended from the house of Lancaster did separate it onely in order and government from the Crown and so continueth at this day and all that is before spoken concerning the Duke and the Dukedom of Lancaster appeareth in Plowden 212. and that which there followeth Before I write further concerning the Nobility I should set down the form of the Kings Letters Patents of their Creations and the manner of solemnity used in the admittance and investry of Marquesses Earls Viscounts and Barons according to their severall degrees But I do willingly omit so to do partly because in effect the same may appear by that before recited Patent for the Creation of a Duke altering onely such things which of right ought to be altered and partly because their Patents are not onely extant and of Record but also because all those things are to be read in a printed English Book of this subject judicially made by Tho. Mills being a matter also proper to the Colledge and Corporation of Heralds and not unto the drift of my discourse and I will briefly set down some other things observable concerning each of them Of Marquesses A Marquesse that is if we consider the very nature of the word is a Governour of the Marches and hath the next place of honour after a Duke This title came to us but of late dayes and was not bestowed upon any one before the time of King Rich. 2. who made Robert Vere Marquesse of Dublin and then it became with us to be a title of honour for before time those that governed the Marches were called commonly Lords Marchers and not Marquesses After the Normans had conquered this land it was carefully observed by them as a matter of much moment and a point of speciall policie to place upon she confines and borders of the Britains or Welsh c. not then subdued men of much valour not onely sufficiently able to incouuter the inrodes and invasions of the enemy but also willing to make on-set of them and inlarge the Conquest these men thus placed were of high bloud credit and conntenance among their country-men the Normans and in whose faith and power the Conqueror reposed speciall confidence and trust and therefore in their territories given unto them to hold their tenures were devised to be very speciall and of great importance and their honours inriched with the name and priviledges of Earls of Chester and for the North border of Wales created to be a County Palatine and the Barons of the middle Poâ—t of the South Marches were adorned in a manner with a Palatine Jurisdiction having a Court of Chancery and Writs only among themselvs pleadable to thâ— inteâ—t that their attendance might not thence be driven for the prosecution of controversies and quarrells in the Law and as for the other part of the South Marches they seemed sufficiently fenced with the River of Severn and the Sea Of Earls FIrst It is to be observed that originally within this Kingdome Earldomes of Counties in the ancient English Saxon Government were not onely Dignities of Honour but also Offices of justice for that they did further the administration of justice in the Counties whereof they were Earls or Aldermen They had likewise their Deputies under them the Sheriff an Officer yet in being and retayning the name
is no heire male at all that may claime the same for then doth this question take place whether the husband of such heire female shall enioy the dignitie in the right of his wife or no wherein wee are to rest upon a resolution had and given in this speciall question which was in this manner In the time of Hen. 8. when Mr. Winbie tooke upon him the stile of Lord Talboys in the right of his wife having none issue by her the said King assisted both by Civill and Temporall Lawyers gave sentence that no husband of Baronesse in her right should use the stile and dignitie untill he had by her a Child whereby he should become Tenant by the courtesie unto her inheritance The speciall reasons that occasioned this sentence were two First it should be inconvenient for her husband this day to bee a Baron and Peere of the Realme and to morrow by the death of his wife to become none and that without the death of the partie Secondly if he had issue by his wife and were intituled to be Tenant by the curtesie of England of the wives land if hee shall not also beare the stile and dignitie of her Barony then should his sonne after the death of his mother dying in the life time of his father bee Baron and Lord without land for so the Father should have the land as Tenant by the curtesie and the sonne the Lordship without Land And thus much said concerning the nature quality and estate of a Baron by writ and for resolution of the severall points and Articles of the question proposed may suffice Barons by Patent which is the third kind of Barons mentioned in the former division of Barons THere is also a fourth meanes of creation by act of Parliament but the first 2. mentiond and this by Patent are most for the honour of the King for thereby the donation doth proceed from his highnes onely as from the fountaine of all honour and dignity but when the creation is by Parliament every one may bee said donator Cookes 8. part 19. A Baron by creation by reason of Letters Patents is that Noble person whom the Kings Maiesty or any of his progenitors Kings of the Realme have created Barons by such their Letters Patents But this manner of creating Barons by Patent began in the Raign of R. 2. who created first Iohn Beauchamp of Holt Baron of Kidderminster by his Letters Patents 8. October anno 11. But Mils saith in 30. H. 6. this was brought in This kind of dignity of Baron shall bee of such countenance in discent or otherwise as shall beelimited in the Habendi in such Letters Patents contained for it may be but for the life of him to whom it is given or for terme de anter vie of some other mans life as some hold opinion in 9. H. 6. 29. for Cujus est dare eius est dispoâ—ere it may be in speciall a generall tayle and this kind of estate tayle was usuall before the Statute made 13. E. 1. by which estate tayle in Lands and Tenements was created as appeareth by the Patent whereby Hubert de Burgo was made Earle of Kent in the time of H. 3. by these words Habend sibi hered suis de corpore Maâ—gaâ—etaeuxoris suâ— sororis Alexandri Regis Scotiâ— procreatis pro defectu talis exitus remaâ—ere rectis heredâ—bus dicti Huberti and that estates in tayle are at this day titles of honour by the Statute of Westm 2. vide Nevils case Cooks 7. part 33. For the better explanation of this kind of dignity the resolution also of certaine questions shall be very requisite Question If a Nobleman and his Progenitors have for a long time been called to the Parliament and be a Baron either by tenure or writ have had in regard thereof a place certaine in Parliament if afterwards the same Nobleman should be created a Baron of that Barony and by the same name by Letters Patents whether shall hee and his heires retaine his old place in Parliament which hee had according to the former dignity or whether shall he lose â—is old place and take a new place according to the time of his creation onely Answer The case of the Lord Delaware received a resolution Coo 11. part â—â—e Lord de la wares case somewhat answerable to this question Tho. Lord Delaware 3. â— 6. being in some displeasure with William West his Nephew and heire who was Father to the now Lord De la ware procured an Act of Paâ—liament by the which the said Wâ—ll West was during his naturall life only clearly disabled to clayme demand or have any manner of right title or interest by discent â—evenue or otherwise in or to the mannor lands tenements or hereditaments title and dignity of Thomas Lord De la wâ—re his Vncle Afâ—er the said Thomas De la ware dyed and the said VVilliam West was in the time of the late Queene Elizabeth restored and afterwards in the 8. yeare of her Raigne was â—teated Lord De la ware by Patent and had place in Parliament according to his creation by Patent for that by the said Act of Parliament in the time of E. 6. hee was excluded to challenge the former ancient Baâ—ony and after hee dyed whether the new Lord Dela ware should take his place to the ancient Barony by writ or according to his Fathers creation by Patent was the question the opinion of the late Queenes Counsell being Her Majesties Atturney Generall and Solicitor were that the acceptance of the new creation by the said William West could not distinguish the ancient dignity in him at the time of his creation but the dignity was at that time by the Act of Parlâ—ament 3. E. 6. in obeyance suspence or consideration of Law and hee thereby utterly disabled to have the same during his life only so as other acceptance could not extinguish that dignity which hee then had not nor could not conclude his hâ—ire who was not disabled by the said Act of 3. E. 6. to clayme the ancient Barony which opinion of theirs was seene and allowed by the resolution of the chiefe Iustice of England and Lord chiefe Baron and so signified unto the Lord Keeper but this is to bee noted by the reasons made for the said resolution that if the said William West had beene Baron and intituled or in possession of the ancient dignity when hee accepted the said creation the Law perchance might have been otherwise but that remayneth as yet unresolved neverthelesse the rule eodem mod quo quid constuitur dissolvitur but by grant which is made a matter in fact a man cannot transferre his title of honour Cook 7. part And thus much concerning the three degrees of Barons within this Realme may suffice to be said in geneâ—all upon this occasion for the better understanding and direction of that which followeth to be handled And in this place I thinke it not impertinent
Land-lord and that by the space of two yeares whereupon he doth bring a writ of Cessavit which is his remedy given him by the Law thereby to recover the inheritance of the land but the said Lord for the saving of his tenancy being minded to pay all the arrerages before judgment given against him as by the Law hee ought to doe in this case hee must come in proper person and not by Atturney 15. H. 7. 9. b. If a noble man in contempt of any processe which hath beene awarded from out of any the Kings Courts doth make rescous and wilfully doth refuse to obey the said writ and the same his offence doth appeare of record to the Court by the Sheriffs returne there may be and shall be awarded against him a Capias 1 H. 5. Case ult 27 H. 8. 22. Cooks 6. part 54. If any Lord doe depart this Realm as Ambassadour or otherwise by the Kings licence or without licence and doe not returne at the Kings Commandement or upon the Kings writ under his privy Signet the King may seize his lands goods and chattells Dyer 108. b. 17. the Dutchesse of Suffolks case If a Lord arrested upon a Supplicavit for the peace doe wilfully refuse to obey the arrest and make rescous upon his returne shall issue an attachment against the said Lord for his contempt to take his body and this is the way to obtaine peace against any Lord of the Parliament whereas the party could not have an attachment against him if the Subpoena had beene duly served and peaceably accepted although the said Lord had not appeared thereunto Cromptons Justice of Peace 134. If a Lord of the Parliament doth with force and arms detaine a man in prison in his House or elsewhere the remedy is in such cases by himselfe or his friends abroad at liberty to have a writ called de homine replegiando to deliver him but if the Lord to prevent the execution thereof and of malice doe keep or convey away this man so wrongfully imprisoned so privily as that the Sheriffe cannot execute his said writ then will the Court award a Witheram whereby the Sheriffe shall attach and arrest the body of the said Lord and imprison him untill he doe deliver his said prisoner 11 H. 4. 15. All Lords are compellable to take the Oath mentioned in the Statute of 3 Jac. 4. vide the Statute 7 Jac. cap. 6. who have authority to minister the said Oath to them Bracton lib. 5. fol. 337. 6. H. 3. 351. writing of essoines delivereth this learning that if a Baron that holdeth by Baron tenure have his absence excused by essoine he which casteth such essoine or excuse ought to finde surety that the said essoine is true but in case of common persons it shall rest upon the credit and integrity of the Essoinee and so is the use at this day The Statute of magna charta cap. 1â— is quod liber homo non amercietur pro parvo delicto nisi secundum modum illius delicti pro magno delicto secundum magnitudinem delicti nulla praedictarum misericordiarum ponatur nisi per Sacramentum proborum legalium hominum de vicinate and accordingly is the Law thereunto at this day But the subsequent words in the said Statute viz. Comites Barones non amercientur nisi per pares suos non nisi secundum modum delicti are not in use for whether the offence be great or small for which they are to be amerced their amercement must be certaine viz. of a Duke ten pound and of any other of the Nobility Also whereas the amercement should be offered per pares the use is to offer them by the Barons of the Exchequer Cooks 8. Rep. 40. Bracton lib. 3. Tractat. 2. cap. 1. fol. 116. b. When a Peere of the Realme is arraigned in Appeale of Fellony he shall not have that priviledge to bee tried by his Peere as he should in case of Inditement but must undergoe the ordinary triall of twelve men Stamford Pleas of the Crowne lib. 3. cap. 1. Brook triall 142. Ferdinando Poulton 188. b. Read the book of Entries title appeale Sect. 7. also in Case of an Inditement the Defendant though a Peere of the Realme may not challenge any of his Triers either peremptorily or upon causes which in like cases permitted to all other common persons The Judgement to be given against any Lord of the Parliament in case of Felony or Treason shall be no other than according to the usuall judgement given against common persons and although the execution be not pursuant but with the losse only of their heads yet that is by the speciall grace of the King and not ex debito as by the examples of Thomas Lord Dacre 33. H. 8. and of the Lord Sturton 2 Mariae may appeare Brook tit Jury 48. By attainder of Treason or Fellony is corruption of blood so that their Children may not be heires unto them nor unto any of their Ancestors And if hee were a noble man before he is by the attainder made ignoble and not only himselfe but also his Children having no regard unto the Nobility which they had by their birth and this corruption is so strong and high that it cannot be saved by the Kings pardon or otherwise than by authority of Parliament Stamford Pleas del Coronae lib. 3. cap. 34. But here it is to bee observed that Nobility is not a thing substantiall but meere accidentall for that may be present or absent without corruption of the Subject whereof it dependeth for experience sheweth that the passage of honourable titles are restrained by exorbitant crimes when as nature in the meane while cannot bee thrust away with a fork Wherefore although the Lawyers doe terme and call that extinguishment of Nobility which hapneth by such hainous offences committed as corruption of blood neverthelesse they use not this manner of phrase and speech as though Nobility were naturally and essentially in the humour of blood more than any other hereditary faculty but because the right of inheritance which is by degree of communication of blood directed is by that meanes determined and ended and also in regard of the hatred and detestation of the crime it is called corruption of blood note in Dyer 16. Eliz. 332. the Lord Charles Howards case If one be made a Knight in a forraigne Kingdome by a forraigne Knight yet he is to be so stiled in this Realme in all legall proceedings but if a man be created by the Emperour an Earle of the Empire or into any other title of dignity he shall not beare this title here in England Cooks 7. part 16. 20. E. 46. If there be a Father and Sonne and the Father is seised of lands holden in Capite or otherwise by knightly service the King doth create the same Duke and Earle or of any other degree of Nobility and afterwards the Father dieth his Sonne being within the age
tryall hereof shall not be by Record as in the former case but by a Jury of 12. men and the reason of the diversity is because in this case the Dignity is accrewed unto her by marriage which the Lawyers tearme matter in fact and not by any record Cookes 6. part 53. a. But a noble Woman by Marriage though she take to her a second Husband a man of meane degree yet shee may keepe two Chaplaines according to the Proviso in the Statute of 21. H. 8. c. 13. for and in respect of the honour which once she had viz. at the time of the retayner and every such Chaplaine may purchase lycense and dispensation Cookes 4. part 117. Cowels Instutions lib. tit 10. 15. but her Chaplaines may not be nonresident afterwards And forasmuch as the retayning of Chaplaines by Ladies of great estates is ordinary and neverthelesse some questions in law have beene concerning the true understanding of the said Statute law I thinke it not impertinent to set downe some subsequent resolutions of the Judges touching such matters Anne Baronesse of Mount Eagle in her Widdowhood did retaine two Chaplaines according to the Statute and one of them had but one Benefice and therefore did obtaine a dispensation with a confirmation from the Queene according to the tenour of the said Statute but before he was presented to his second Benefice the Lady did take to Husband Henry Lord Compton whereby she did forsake her former dignity of Baronesse of Mount-Eagle and afterward the said Chaplain did accept a second Benefice and was therunto admitted and inducted and the Judges have resolved that the Chaplain hath done nothing herein but according to the meaning of the Statute and that the Ladies marriage between his Retainer and acceptance of his second benefice was no Countermand Revocation or determination of that Retainer which the Lady lawfully then did make but that she living he might proceed to the filling up of the qualification Causa origio est materia negoti for though the wife of a Noble-man during the covecture cannot by Law rerain a Chaplain to be quallified according to the statute because by Intendment her Husbands Chaplains are sufficient for that Office yet forasmuch as the Retainer was lawfull then she was widdow that being the principall matter shall enable him to take use and benefice after her marriage for though the husband and wife are but one person in Law yet as the Text is sunt animo duo in carne uno Bracton lib. 5. fol. 363 a. And in this case by the death of the Lord Compton her first Retainer was not determined for without any neer Retainer her said Chaplain may take his second benefice and also for that cause so long as the said Chaplains do attend upon their said Lady in her House they shall not be endammaged for Non-residency Cooks 4. part 117. fol. 90 76. That which remains concerning the further exposition of this statute you may read before in the title of priviledge of Lords So long that the wife of a Duke be called Dutchesse or of an Earl be a Countesse and have the fruition of all the Honours appertaining to that estate with kneeling tasting serving and the rest and so long shall a Barons widow be saluted Lady and a Knights wise also by the courteous Speech of England quandiu Maj. aut viduitas vic durant except she happen to relaps with an Adulterer for as the Laws of this Kingdome do adjudge that a woman shall lose her dower in that case viz. west cap. B. F. N. B. fol. 150. H. Perk. fel. 70. Kitchin 162. b. as Ruto Lands and Tenents so justly so doth the Laws of Gentry and Noblenesse give sentence against such a woman advanced to Titles of Dignity by the husband to be unworthy to enjoy the same when she putting her husband out of mind hath subjected her self to another If a Lady which is married come through the Forrests he shall not take any thing but a Dutchesse or a Countesse shall have advantage of the statute de Charta Forest 11. Art during the time that she is unmarried Cromptons Court fol. 167 b. Wheras it is contained in the great Charter amongst other things in the Form which followeth no Freeman shall be taken or imprisoned or deseised of his Free-hold or his Liberties or Free-customs or shall be outlawed or banished or in any wise destroyed nor go upon him but by the lawfull judgment of his Peers or by the Law of the Land In which statute is no mention made how women Ladies of great estate because of their Husbands Peers of the Land married or sole that is to say Dutchesse Countesse or Barronesse shall be put to answer or before what Iudges they shall be judged upon an Inditement of Treason or Fellonyes by them committed or done because wherof it is an Ambiguity in the Law of England before whom and by whom such Ladies so endicted shall be put to answer and be judged by our said Soveraign Lord the King willing to put out such Ambiguities and Doubts hath declared by Authority aforesaid that such Ladies so endicted or hereafter to be endicted whether they be married or sole therof shall bee brought in answer and put to answer and judged before such Iudges and Peers of the Realm as Peers of the Realm should be if they were endicted of any Treasons or Fellonyes done or hereafter to be done and in like manner and Form and in none otherwise Anno 2. H. 6. Cap. 9. Which statute was but a Confirmation or Declaration of the common Law vide Cooks 6 part 52. b. This is a Rule in the civill law si filia R. nubat alicui dom vel Comiti dicetur semp Regalis As amongst Noble women there is a difference of degrees so according to their distinct excellentnesse the law doth give speciall Priviledges as followeth By the statute of 25. E. 3. cap. 2. It is High Treason to compose or imagine the death of the Queen or to violate the Kings Companion The Kings Espouse is a sole person exempted by the common law and she may purchase by Fee-simple or Make leases or Grants without the King she may plead and be impleaded which no other married woman can do without her husband Cook 4 part 23. B. Theol. lib 1. cap. 4. 24. E. 3. 63. vide Bracton 363. a. All Acts of Parliaments for any cause which any way may concern the Queen and her Capacity are such statutes wherof the Judges ought to take recognisance as of generall statutes for though the matter do only concern the Capacity of the Queen yet it doth also concern all the subjects of the Realm for every subject hath interest in the King and none of his Subjects who are within his Lawes in divided from the King being his head and Soveraigne so that his businesse and things do touch all the Realme and as all the Realme hath interest in the King so and
for the same Reason in the Queene being his wife Plouden 23. 1. a. Coâ—kes 8. Repl. 28. A man seised of divers Lands in Fee holden by Knights service some by Prioritie that is by ancient Feofment holden of others and some other parts holden by the same tenure of the King by posteritie the King granteth his Seigniory to the Queene and afterwards the Tenant dyeth the sonne within age in this case the King shall have the Wardship of the Body and have the Prerogative even as the King himselfe should have had 3. E. 3 4. vide etiam Stamford Prerog Reg. cap. 2. The Queene wife unto the King or widdow shall not be amerced if she be non-suited in any Action or otherwise in which cases any other subject of what degree soever shall be amerced for in this case the Queen shall participate the Kings Prerogative Cookes 6. Report 62. But the Queene shall not in all cases have the same Prerogatives that the King shall have in the same case as for Example Petition is all the remedy the Subject hath when the King seizeth his Lands or taketh away his Goods from him having no title by order of Law so to doe contrary to the opinion of some ancient Bookes as you may see Stamfords Prerog cap. 19. But in such suit shall be made to the Queene but actions against other Leiges of the King according as the case shall require for by the same reason that the Queene may be Plaintiffe and Demandant in actions without the King by the same reason that the Queene may be Plaintiffe and Demandant in actions without the King by the same reason he shall be Defendant or Tenant without pertaking such Prerogatives as doe appertaine to the King 11. H. 4. 64. B. Stamford Prerog cap. 22. in fine Against the King by his Prerogative Nullum tempus occurit Regi but time shall runne against the Queen H. 18. E. 3. 2. a. and aplenarty by sixe mouthes is a good plea in a Quare Imp. brought by Philippa Regina Angliae ibid. fol. 1. et 13. b. Stamford Prerog cap. 18. prope finem In 21. E. 3. 13. b. It is thus to be read note that a protection was sued forth against the Queen in a Writ which she brought and it was allowed though shee be a person exempt Neverthelesse by this short case following may bee observed that the Justices doe not easily suffer any proceedings in Law against the Queene wife or widdow but will hold with their Inmities as much as they may by Law A Writ of dower was brought against Isabel Queene of England mother of the King that then was and the Couâ—t said to the Plaintiffe the Queene is a person of dignitie and excellencie and we are of opinion that she shall not answer to the Writ but it behooveth you to sue to her by Petition and thereupon the Demandant dixit grat and shee prayed the Court to grant a continuance of her Action untill another day so that in the meane time she might sue to speake with the Queen but the Court would not agree to make a Continuanâ—e but said that upon her request they might give day precepart and so it was done for the Queenes Couneell would not agree to a continuance for thereby the Queene should bee accepted as answerable 10. E. 3. 379. The wife of the Kings eldest sonne also hath some Prerogative in regard of the excellencie of her Husband which the wives of other Noblemen have not for by the Statute of 25. E. 3. it is high Treason to violate the wife of the Kings eldest sonne and heire Dutchesses also and Countesses have speciall Honour appertaining to their Estates as kneeling and tasting and such like which things as appertaining more properly to the Heraulds then to this legall discourse I leave unto them By the Statute made 7. Iac. cap. 6. intituled An Act for the Administring the oath of Allegiance and Reformation of Women recusants if any person or persons of or above the age of 18. yeeres and degrees aforesaid must and hereafter shal stand and be presented indicted or convicted for not comming to Church or not receiving the holy Communion or Sacraments of the Lords Supper according to the Lawes and Statutes of this Realme before the Ordinary or other having lawfull power to take such presentment or indictment then 3. of the Privie Counsell of the King his Highnesse his Heires or Successours and no other whereof the Lord Treasurer the Lord Chancellour Lord Privie Seale or principall Secretary to be one upon knowledge shall require such person or persons to take the said Oath but it shall be lawfull to and for every Bishop within his Diocesse to require any Baron or Barons of the age of 18. or above to take the said Oath Also in cases of indictment of Felony or Treason a Baronesse shall have the same tryall by Peeres as doth appeare by the Statute of 20. H. 6. cap. 9. which any other Noble woman of higher degree shall have which priviledge is denyed to all of a lower degree then a Baronesse Ladies in Reputation The wife and widdow and widdow of the sonne and heire of a Duke or Earle in the life of his Father is a Lady by courtesie of speech and honour and taketh place according as in ancient time hath been permitted by the Soveraign Prince and allowance of the Herauld but in legall proceedings they are not to have priviledges nor to be named according to such sirnames of dignity but the King may at his pleasure create such men in the life time of their Ancestors into degrees of Lords of his Parliament and then the Law is otherwise If a Noblewoman of Spaine come into the Realme by safe conduct or otherwise by the King shee be stiled by such her forraign stile of dignity yet in the Kings Courts of Justice she shall not be named by such title though by common speech she be a Lady in reputation An English woman borne doth take to her Husband a Spanish or French Duke though he be made a Denizen yet he shall not beare his title of dignity in legall proceedings A German woman is married to the Earl of Northam or to other the Nobility of England unlesse she be made a Denizen she cannot lawfully claim the priviledges or title of her husband no more then she can to have dower or any jointure from him An English Woman doth take to Husband the Earle of Kildare in Ireland or if a Lord of Scotland though he be a post natus take an English woman to his wife their wives shall not participate their husbands Titles of Dignitie But if the King do create one of his Subjects of Scotland naturalized here by Act of Parliament to be Viscount Rochester within England and after by his Writ of Summons under his Great Seale doe call him to his uper House of his Parliaments and assigne him a place there in his great Councell amongst the Lords and Peeres of
the Realme hee is now also a Peere of this Realme and shall be partaker with them in all Priviledges and by consequence his wife widdow and children after him 32. E. 3. 35. in le case de Gilbert Humfrevill But if an Englishman by the Emperour be made Earle of the Empire his wife shall not beare that title of Honour either according to Law or in Reputation All the Daughters of Dukes Marquesses and Earles are by custome of long time used in the Kings Houses or palace named Ladies and have precedencie and place according to the degrees of their parents and so of this custome the Law doth take notice and give allowance for the honour and decencie but neverthelesse in the the Kings Courts of Justice they beare not these titles of Honour no more then the sonnes of such Noble person may doe brothers to such Ladies Finis Nob. litatis A TREATISE OF KNIGHTS AND Matters incident to the Degree of Knighthood according to the Lawes of England THE particular kinde of services by which lands of Inheritance are distinguished be two viz. Knight service and socage vide Littletons Soccage c. 26. In ncient time Tenure by Knights service was called Regale Servitium Cooke in his Preface to his 3. Book fol. 3 a. because it was done to and for the King and the Realme and formi secum servitium as appeareth in Anno 19. Edw. 2. Title Avowry 224. 26. ass p. 66. 17. H. 4. 19. Cookes 7. part 8. a. Calvins case because they which doe hold by soccage ought to doe and performe their services out of the Realme Littleton 35. Et ideo formi secum dicipoterit quia sita capitur foris Hum. Servitiam persolvuntur ratione tenementarum non personarum Bracton fol. 36. And as Knights service land requireth the service of the tenement in warfare and battell abroad so Soccage tenure commandeth his-attendance at the plough the one by manhood defending the King or his Lords life and person the other by industry maintaining with rents corne and victuals his estate and family See Lambert Customes of Kent fol. 389. For they did thus order their owne lands and tenements one part they kept and detained in their owne hands and in them stately houses and Castles were erected and made for their habitation and defence of their persons and the Realme also Forrests and Parkes were made there for their pleasures Solace and Delight One other part hereof was given to the Nobles and others of their Chivalty reserving tenure by Knights service The third part was bestowed upon men of meaner condition and quallity with reservation of soccage tenure and in this manner the Dukes and other the Nobles with their menialls and followers dissipate to a great part of their lands viz. to their Gentlemen of quality to hold by Knights service and to others of meaner condition by Soccage tenure Gervasius Tilburiensis a learned man who flourished in the dayes of King Hen. 2. in his Dialogue of the observation of the Kings Exchequer hath in effect as followeth Untill the time saith he of King Hen. 1. the King used not to receive money of their lands but victuals for the provision of their house and towards the payment of their Souldiers wages and such like charges Mony was raised out of the Cities and Castles in which Husbandry and Tillage was not used and exercised But at length when the King being in the parts beyond the Seas needed ready money for and towards the Furniture of the warres and his Subjects and Farmers complained that they were grievously troubled by carriage of Victuals into sundry parts of the Realme farre distant from their dwelling houses the King directed Commissions ro certaine discreet persons who having a regard of those Victuals should reduce them into reasonable summes of Money the leavying of which summes they appointed to the Sheriffe taking order withall that he should pay them at the scale or beame that is to say That hee should pay sixe pence over and above every pound weight of money because that they thought that the money in time would waxe so much the worse for the wearing Cambdens Perambulation of Kent fol. 172 173. Vide Littleton libro 2. fol. 26. Note also Gervasius Tilburiensis who lived Anno 11 60. Anno 6. Hen. 2. And Cambden fol. 178. It was anciently ordained that all Knights Fees should come unto the eldest Sonne by succession of Heretage whereby hee succeeding his Ancestours in his whole Inheritance might bee the better enabled to maintaine the warres against the Kings Enemies or his Lords And that the Soccage Fee should be partable betweene the Male Children to enable them to encrease into many Families for the better furtherance in and increase of Husbandry See Cookes Preface to the Reader in his Ninth Booke Fol. 2. 6. But as nothing is more unconstant then the estate we have in Land and livings if at least I may call that an estate which never standeth even so long since These tenures have been so indifferently mixed and confounded in the hands of each sort that there is not now any note of difference to be gathered by them See Lamberts perambulation of Kent fol. 10. Et quia tale servitium formi secum non semper manet sub eadem quantitate sed quandoque praefat ad plus quandoque ad mâ—nus Ideo qualitate Regalis Sencitii quantitate fiat mentio in charta ut tenens vectu tenere possit quid quantum persolvere tentatur Bracton fol. 36. And therefore the certainty of the law in this case is That he that holdeth by a whole and entire Knights fee must serve the King or other Lord fortie dayes in the warres well and sufficiently arrayed and furnished at all points and by twenty dayes if he hold but the moitie of a Knights fee and so proportionably vide Littleton fol. 20. Aâ—no 7. E. 3. 1333. fol. 246. It was demurred in Judgement whether the 40. dayes should be accounted from the first day of the muster of the Kings Hoast or from the day that the King doth first enter into Scotland but it seemeth that the dayes shall be accounted from the first day that the King doth enter into Scotland because the Service is to bee done out of the Realme And they who hold per regale servitium are not to performe that service unlesse the King doe also go himselfe into the warres in proper person and that by the opinion of Sir William Hall Chiese Justice of the Court of â—ommon Pieas Term. Trin. Anno. 7. Ed. 3. fol. 246. but see Anno 3. H. 6. Titulo protec 2. In which case it was observed that seeing the protector who was pro Rex went the same was adjudged a Voyage Royall vide Cook 7 part of his reports and in Fitz-â—erbert Natura brevia 28. fol. 83. Also when before the statute De quia emptores terrarum made Anno 18. Ed. 4. the King or other Lord had given
Lands to a Knight to hold of him by service in Chivalry to go with the King or with his Lord when the King doth make a Voyage Royall to subdue his Enemies by 40 days well and conveniently arrayed for the Wars In this case the Law hath such regard to the dignity of Knighthood that he â—ay find an able person to go in that expedition for him and the Knight is not compellable by his tenure to go in person as do ordinary souldiers who are hired and entertained by prest money or wages Anno 7. Ed. 3. 296. 600. 8. part fol. 49. b. And see Littleton fol. 20. another reason in this case There have bin many vaâ—rying opinions of Countries of a Knights Fee as you may read in 5. Ed. Cooke 9. part of his Reports fol. 124. where he seemeth to prove that antiquity hath thought that 20. l. in land was sufficient to maintain the degree of a Knight as it appeareth in the ancient Treatise De modo tenendi Parliamentum tempore Regis Edw. filii Regis Etheldred Which also doth concur with that Act of Parliament made Anno 1. Ed. 2. de militibus by which Act of Parliament Census militis The state of the Knight is measured by 20. l. land a year and not by any certain content of acres and with this doth agree the state of Westmin ca. 36 and Fitz-natum Brev. 82. where 20. l. land in socage is put in Equipage with a Knights Fee and this is the most reasonable estimation for one acre may be lesse in value then many others vid. An. 27. E. 3. c. 11. the printed books of the titles of honor 319. M. Selden nata And it is to be observed that the relief of a Knight of all Superiours that are noble is the 4. part of their revenue by the yeer as of a Kt. 5. l. which is the 4. part of 20. l. sic de cet And this doth appear by the statute of Mag. charta ca. 8 as in Cooks 9. report f. 124. b. And because this tenure doth concern service in war the Tenants therfore are named milites a militia For though the word do properly signifie a souldier yet antiquity hath appropriated that name to the chiefest of the military profession vid. Bract. f. 35. b. In our law they are stiled Miles and never Equites yet so that Miles is taken for the selfsame that Chevalier by M. Selden in his Titles of Honour 1. Impression f. 334. Bracton f. â—9 maketh mention of Râ—d-knights that is to say serving horsemen who held their lands with condition that they should serve their Lords on horseback and so by the cutting of a piece of a name as our delight is to speak short this name of Knight remaineth with us Cambden fol. 171. for Armiger scilicet Esquire which is a degree under a Knight was in the Militarie Service Note that he that holdeth by a whole Knights Fee must bâ— with the King by 40. days well and conveniently arrayed for the war Littleton fol. 20. which is to be understood to serve on horseback And in all Nations the name of this dignity is taken of Horses for the Italians calleth them Caveleiri the French-men Chivalers the Germans Roysters our Britains in Wales Morgogh All of Ryding in Latin we call them equites aurati for at their creations beside the sword and girdle guilt spurs were added for a matter of more ornament See the statute of Anno 8. H. 5 C. 3. M. Selden f. 317. and when a Knight doth commit any offence for which he is by the Law to suffer death The use hath bin in the beginning of this punishment to degrade and deprive him publikely of his Honour of Knighthood For it is but life lost or taken away Vide Mills fol. 81. by ungirding his Military girdle by taking away his sword his guilt Spurs cut off with a Hatchet his Gauntlets pluckt off from him and the schochean of his Arms reversed 4. E. 4. 20 Cambden 171 b. and of the degradation of a Knight which was Andrem Horkley under E. 2. who was a Scot born by that King created Earl of Carleile vide Selden his Titles of Honour fol. 337. And by the statute made Anno 24. H. 8. cap. 13. intituled An Act of Reformation of apparell It was permitted for Knights to wear in a Collar of Gold named a Collar of 55. Esses And although this dignity of Knighthood had its originall and was given to men of war yet in all successions of Ages and in all Nations the same also is bestowed on men of peace by Sovereign Kings that in severall Functions and places in the Common-weal be of singular desert wherby the service of the Common-weale at home is levelled and made equall with that abroad for as Tully said truly Parva sunt focis Arma risi est Consilium domi He that receiveth the Dignity of a Knight kneeleth down and the King slightly smiteth him upon the shoulder speaking these words unto him therwithall in French So is Chevalier a nome de dieu that is to say Be thou a Knight in the name of God and then afterwards therupon the King saith Avances Chevalier that is arise Sir Knight vide Hooker al. Vocrell his C. 10. fol. also Selden f. 37. who there speaketh of our Earl Marshal of England for making of Knights for a Knight is not made by Letters pattents or by the Kings Writs as are those of greater dignity but by the sword For this Honour is supposed to be given on the sudain and therfore it is commonly done only by the sword without any pattent but the King may by his Letters Pattenâ—s create a Knight Earls in ancient time had power in Knighthood M. Selden title Honors fol. 136. But now neither may the Prince nor any other of the Nobility make a Knight but only the King or his Lieutenant by Commission hereof vide Cook 6. part Dyer reports f. 74. b. No man is born a Knight Selden f. 3. 18 as he may be to titles of Honour Causa patet But a Knight may be made so soon as he is baptized as in that book is mentioned excepts Knights Barronets whose posterity doth receive that title by discent with some limitation as in the Kings Books therof may appear Note also in the said Titles of Honour fol. 318. and 313. the first Knight made in England With us in England there are divers sorts of Knights wherof Camden fol. 171. and Mills do write at large but my purpose is only to speak of one order of them amongst the Romanes there was but one Order of them And these were next in degree to the Senators themselves as with us they are to the Barons and they who simply without any addition be called Knights howsoever they are in Order ranked last yet by institution they be first and of greatest antiquity and the other attributes according to the severall inventions of particular Princes And I do not
proceedings onely by such name and title as he hath received from the King of this Realm whose Subject he is and if by the King of England he be not advanced to Title of Honour then shall he bear the name of his Baptism onely and Surname unlesse he be a Knight 20 Ed. 4. 6. Cook 7. part 16. a. A Duke of Spain or of other forraign Nation cometh into England by the Kings safe-Conduct in which also the King doth stile him Duke according to his Creation neverthelesse in all proceedings in the Kings Courts he shall not be stiled by his name of dignity Cook in the last Book before And though the said Noble person be also by the Kings Letters Patents and by his forraign name and title of dignity made Denizen for that is the right name so called because his legitimation is given unto him for if you derive Denizen from Denizee as one born within the Allegiance or Obedience of the King then such a one should be all one with a naturall born Subject wherein a Denizen faileth in many things or if they be naturalized also by the authority of Parliament whereby he seemeth to be in all things made as a Subject born in England yet he shall not be stiled with his forraign title of dignity Cooks 7 part 15. a. And so it is if a Noble man of France â— come into England as Ambassadour and here by lawfull Marriage hath issue a sonne the father dieth the son is by birth a naturall English-man yet he shall not bear the Title of Honour of his father and the cause and reason hereof is Because the title of his Nobility had his originall by a French King and not by any naturall peration which thing is well proved both by authority of Law and experience in these dayes for in the book last mentioned in that leaf is resolved a more stranger case that is albeit that a Postnatus of Scotland or Ireland who is in these dayes a naturall Subject to the King of England or any of his posterity be he the heir of a Noble man of Scotland or of Ireland yet he is none of the Nobility of England But if that Allien or stranger born or Scot be summoned by the Kings Writ to come unto his Parliament and is therein stiled by his forraign stile or by other Title whereunto he is invested within England by the Kings grant then from thenceforth he is a Peer of this Realm and in all Judiciall and legall proceedings he ought to be so stiled and by no other name 39 Ed. 3. 36. And it was the case of Guilbert Humphreyvile Earl of Anger 's in Scotland For it appertaineth to the Royall prerogative of the King to call and to admit any Alien born to have voyce and place in his Parliament at his Parliament at his pleasure although it is put in practice very rarely and seldome time and that for very great and weighty considerations of State And if after such Parliamentary Summons of such a stranger born question do arise and the issue whether he is of that title or no it may well be tryed by the Records which is the onely lawfull tryall in that case Cooks 7. part 15. a 6 part 53. But there is a diversity worthy the observation for the highest and lowest dignities are universall and therefore a Knight in all place soever he received his title of dignity and so ought of right and by Law be named in the Kings Courts 26 Ed. 4. 6. 39. Ed. 3. 36. Also if the Emperour or the King of Denmark or any other forraigne King come into this Realm by safe-Conduct as he ought For a Monarch or an absolute Prince though he be in League cannot come into England without License and safe-Conduct of the King of England but any subject to such forraigne King in league may come into this Realm without License Cook 7. part 21. 6. in this case he shall sue and be sued by the name of Emperour or King other wise the writ shall abate There is a notable president cited out of Fleta where treating of the Jurisdiction of the Kings Court of Marshalsey it is said And these things he may lawfully do by Office that is to say the Steward of the Kings Houshold notwithstanding the liberty of any other although in another Kingdom where the offender may be found in the Kings house according to that which happened â—t Paris held in the 14 yeer of Ed. 1. of one Engleam of Nogent taken in the Houshold of the King of England the King himself being then in Paris with Silver dishes lately stollen at which deed the King of France being present and whereupon the Court of the King of France did claym cognizance of the plea concerning that theft by Jurisdiction of the Court of Paris the matter being diversly debated in the Councell of the King of France at length it was ordered that the King of England should use and enjoy that his Kingly prerogative of his Houshold where being convicted by Sir Robert Fitz-John Knight Steward of the Kings Houshold of the theft by consideration of the same Court was hanged on the Gallows in St Germans fields Cooks 7. part 15. 6. And there by the way may also be noted from the reason in the recited Books alleadged the person of a King in another Kings Dominions is not absolutely priviledged but that he may be impleaded for debt or trespasse or condemned for Treason committed within the said Dominions for it is a generall Law of Nations That in what place an offence is committed according to the Law of that place they may be judged without regard of any priviledge neither can a King in another Kingdom challenge any such prerogative of immunity from Laws for a King out of his proper Kingdom hath no merum Imperium absolute power but onely doth retain â—onoris titulos dignitatis the Titles of Honour and Dignity so that where he hath offended in his own person against the King of the Nation where he is per omnia distringitur etiam quoad personam he may be distrayned even to his own person And the same Law is of Ambassadours ne occasio daretur dolinquendi lest occasion of offence be given like as a sanctuary will save a mans life from man-slaughter but not when man-slaughter is committed within the Sanctuary for then he doth wilfully wave the benefit of all priviledges and prerogatives and neverthelesse it bindeth firm that Ambassadours are called Legats because they are chosen as fit men out of many and their persons be sacred both at home and abroad so that no man injuriously may lay violent hands upon them without breach of the Law of Nations and much lesse upon the person of a King in a strange Land Bracton a Judge of this Realm in the Raign of King Hen. 3. in his first Book 8 saith in effect as followeth There is no respect of persons with God because God
is no accepter of persons for as unto the Lord he that is greater is as the lesser and he that doth govern as the servant but with men there is a difference of persons viz. The King and under him Dukes Counts Barons Vavasors and Knights Counts so called because they take their name from the County or from the word society who may also be tearmed Consull of Counselling For Kings do associate such men unto them to govern the people of God ordaining them into great honour power and name when they do gird them with swords that is to say ringis gladiorum with the Belts of their swords ringis so called * quasi renes girans circundans for that they compasse the Reins of such that they may keep them from incest and luxury because luxurious and incestuous persons are abominable unto God upon this cause were the stations and encamping of Arms called in the ancient language of Rome casâ—â—â— even of the word Castrare to geld since that they ought to be castrata vel castra In that place ought a good Generall to foresee that Venus delights be as it were gâ—lded and 〈◊〉 off from the Army vide Sir John Ferne his Book intituled The glory of generosity The sword also doth signifie the defence of the Kingdome and Countrey There be other Potents under the King which are called Barons that is to say robor belli the strength of Warre There be others which are called Vavasors viri magnâ— dignitatis â—en of great dignity for Vavasor cannot better be said to be any thing than Vas sortitum ad valetudinem a vessel chosen for valour or as men standing with their Generall ad valuas Regni and this is enough if not too much in generall spoken of the Nobility of England now follow I a more particular discourse of them according to their severall degrees The Prince THe Kings eldest Sonne and Heir apparant is stiled Prince Quasi primum locum capiens post Regem the first next the King To him it was permitted by the Statute of 24. Hen. 8. cap. 13. To wear Silk of the colour of Purple and Cloth of Gold of Tissue in his apparell or upon his horse but by another Statute made in the fourth yeer of King James Chap. 25. all Laws and Statutes concerning apparell are taken away And by the Statute of 34. Hen. 3. cap. 2. Taking shall not be from henceforth made by others then by the Purveyors of the King of the Queen and of the Prince their eldest Sonne and that if any other mans Purveyor make such taking it shall be done of them as those which do without warrant and the deed judged as a thing done against the peace and the Law of the Land and such as do not in manner aforesaid shall be duly punished To eschew maintenance and nourish peace and amity in all parts of the Realm many Statutes have been made in the Raign of Hen. 4. prohibiting the giving of signes or Liveries to any but to their menialls Neverthelesse by the Statute of 2. Hen. 4. cap. 21. It is provided that the Prince may give his honourable Liveries of signes to the Lords or to his meniall Gentlemen and that the said Lords may wear the same as they wear the Kings Livery and that the menialls of the Prince may also wear the same as the Kings menialls But afterwards by occasion of divers other Statutes of latter times made by sundry other Kings for the suppressing of that enormity of maintenance and of the generall words in them that priviledge of the Prince was abridged or rather taken away therefore the Statute of 12. Ed. 4. was made as followeth Item Our Soveraign Lord the King considering that the Prince the first begotten Sonne to the King of England hath been at their liberties to give their Liveries and signes at their pleasure and that divers Statutes against givers and takers of Liveries and signes as well in the time of his noble raign as in the time of his progenitors and predecessors hath been made and that by force of the said Statutes his dear beloved first begotten sonne Edward Prince of Wales Duke of Cornwall and Earl of Chester is as well as any other person restrained to give any such Liveries and signes as our Soveraign Lord the King willing that his first begotten sonne the Prince be at his liberty in receiving any person and giving his signes and Liveries in as large form as any Prince first begotten sonne of any of his Noble Progenitors and predecessors in time pasâ— have been hath ordained and established by authority of the said Parliament that the Prince shall be at his liberty to retain and give his honourable Livery and signe at his pleasure and that the persons so â—â—â—â—ined or to whom such Liveries or signes be or shall be given may be retained and received and wear the same Livery and sign without trouble impediment or impeachment pain contempt or forfeiture or any penalty contained in any of the said Statutes or in any thing in them comprised notwithstanding Nor that the said Statutes in any manner shall extend to any retaining to be made by the said Prince in giving taking or retaining of any Livery or signe of the Prince By the Statute 21. Hen. 8. cap 13. The Prince may retain as many Chaplains as he will though all others of the Nobility other then those of the Kings bloud be restrained to a certain number and they or any of them may purchase licence or dispensation and take receive and keep personages or benefices with cure of souls By order of the common Law a King might have a reasonable ayde of all his Tenents as well of those that did hold of his highnesse by Knights service as of those that did hold their Land in soccage That is to make his eldest Sonne But first note that the ayde is not to be recovered before the Sonne be of the age of 15. yeers or before the Daughter accomplish the age of 7. yeers Fitz Harbert Nat. brevium Knight and for the Marriage of his eldest Daughter and the summe of money was not in certainty but at the Kings pleasure till by the Statute made in the 25. of Ed. 3. cap. 11. by which is enacted as followeth Item It is assented that reasonable aid to make the Kings first Sonne Knight and to marry his eldest Daughter shall be demanded and levied after the forme of the Stature thereof made and not in other manner that is to say of every Knights Fee holden of the King without mean rate 20s and no more and of every 20â— of Land holden of the King without mean in soccagâ— 20s and no more and so rata pro rata of the Lands in soccage And for Lands of the â—enure of Chevalry according to the quantity of the Fee By another Statute made in the said 25. yeer of Ed. 3. cap. 2. amongst other things it is declared that to compasse
of us is deemed the same person with us Wherefore by the Councell and consent of the Prelats Dukes Earls Viscounts and Barons of our Kingdom being in our present Parliament we have made and created and by these presents make and create him the said Edward Prince of Wales and Earl of Chester and to the same Edward we give and grant and by this Charter have confirmed the Name Stile Title State Dignity and the honour of the said Principality that he may therein in governing rule and in ruling direct and defend We by a Garland upon his head by a Ring of Gold upon his Finger and a Virge of Gold have according to the manner invested him to have and to hold to him and to his Heirs the Kings of England for ever Wherefore we will and straightly command for us and our Heirs that Edward our Sonne aforesaid shall have the Name Stile Title State Dignity and honour of the Principality of Wales and of the County of Chester aforesaid unto him and his Heirs the Kings of England aforesaid for ever These being witnesses the Reverend Father John Cardinall and Archbishop of Canterbury Primate of all England our Chancellor and William Archbishop of York Primate of England Thomas Bishop of London John Bishop of Lincolne and William Bishop of Norwich our most welbeloved Cousins Richard Duke of York Humpbry Duke of Buckingham our welbeloved Cousin Richard Earl of Warwick Richard Earl of Salisbury John Earl of Wiltshire and our welbeloved and faithfull Cousins Ralph Cromwell Chamberlain of our House William Falconbridge and John Sturton Knights Dated at Our Palace at Westminster â—he fifteenth day of March and in the yeer of Our Raign â—hirty two And here by the way may be observed that in ancient time and in the time of the English Saxon Kings the use was as well in penning the Acts of Parliament as of the Kings Letters Patents when any lands franchises or hereditaments did passe from the King of any estate of inheritance as also in their creations of any Man unto honour and dignity the conclusion was with the signe of the Crosse in forme aforesaid that is his Testibus c. But long time that forme hath been discontinued so that at this day and for many yeares past all the Kings Patents for lands franchizes and hâ—reditaments doe conclude with teste me ipso neverthelesse in all creations of honour and dignity by Letters Patents the ancient forme of concluding with his testihus is used at this day Cookes 8. part 19. And it hath been resolved by the Judges that all Acts of Parliament and Statutes which doe concerne the Prince who is the first begotten son of the King and heire apparant to the Crowne for the time being Perpetuis futuris temporibus in all succession of ages and times be such Acts whereof the Judges and all the Realme must take conusance as of generall Statutes for every subject hath interest in the King and none of his subjects who is within his Lawes be divided from him being his head and Soveraign so that the businesse and things of the King doth touch all the Realme and namely when it doth concerne the Prince the first begotten sonne of the King and Heire apparant to the Crowne Corruscat enim Princeps radlis Regâ—s Patrâ— sii censetnr und persona cum ipso For the Prince shineth with the beames of the King his Father and is holden to be one person with him Cookes 8. part 28. Although the Prince by expresse words hath no priviledge by the great Charter of the Forrest 9 H. 3. cap. 11. for hunting in the Kings Forrests or Parks passing by them and sent for by the Kings commandment yet by construction the Prince is to take benefit and advantage thereby as well as Bishops Earls or Barons who are expressed Crompt Courts des Justices de Forrests 167. In the Parliament 31. H. 8. c. 10. an Act concerning the placing of the Kings children and Lords in the Parliament and other assemblies were amongst other things made as followeth First it is enacted by the authority aforesaid that no person or persons of what degree estate or condition whatsoever he or they be except only the Kings children shall at any time hereafter attempt or presume to sit or have place at any side of the cloth of state in the Parliament chamber neither of the one hand of the Kings Highnesse or of the other whether the Kings Majesty be there personally present or not The Prince shall not find pledges for the prosecution of any Action and therefore shall be amerced more then the King should be or the Queen his wife Vide Cooks 8. part 61. b. Of the most noble and excellent Prince that now is it is truly said that he is omni nomine numine magnus by destiny name providence of God the greatest before Cook to the Reader before his 8. Book the last leaf Neverthelesse as he is a distinct person by nature from the King so is he distinct by the Law viz. a Subject and holdeth his principalities and seigniories of the King neither shall he have all those Prerogatives which the King shal have for example when the King seizeth his Subjects lands or taketh away his goods from him having no title by order of the Law so to do In this case the Subject is to sue to his Soveraign Lord by way of Petition onely for other remedy hath he not but suit by Petition can be to none other then to the King for no such suit shall be made to the Prince but Actions as the case requireth as against a Subject Stamf. praerog ca. 22. And in token of subjection the Prince doth not upon his Posie of his Arms disdain the old Saxon word Ichdien I serve as Lambert doth mention in his Book of Perambulation of Rent 364. And there is a case that Gascoin chief Justice of Engl in the time of H. 4. did commit the Prince who would have taken a prisoner from the Bar in the Kings Bench and the Prince did humbly obey and did go at his command in which the King did greatly rejoyce that hee had such a Judge who durst minister justice upon his son and also that hee had a son so gracious as to obey Court de Banco Regis 79. Crompton A question was moved to the Justices in the first yeer of H. 7. what order should be in that present parliament for the anulling and making void certain attainders for so much as divers who were returned of that Parliamet did stand attainted of treason and all the Justices resolved That so many of the Knights of the shires or Citizens or Burgesses as stood then attainted of treason should depart out of the Parliament house at the reversall of the Act of Parliament for their attainders But â—s soon as the Act of Parliament was reversed and annuld that they and every of them that is to say Lords and Commons should come into
King of England as also to our selfe by our Letters Patents doe grant and give licence for us and our heires so much as in us lyeth to the said Edmond to dispose and give all his Manours Lands Tenements and Knights fees with their appurtenances and Advowsons of Churches Abbies and Priories and Hospitalls which he holdeth of us in chiefe to whom he pleaseth To have and to hold to him and his heires for us and our heires by the service thereof for ever By which Grant the said Edmond gave all his Lands and Tenements to one William sonne of John Deyncourt and to his heires of his body comming And the said Edmond dyed the last yeere of Edward the second and the said William in the time of Edward the third was summoned among other Barons to the Parliament by vertue of the same gift untill his death which was Anno 3. E. 3. It appeareth by divers offices in the time of King Edward the third that John Handlow in the right of Maud his wife was seized of the Mannour of Holgate Acton Burnell c. for terme of her life remainder to Nicolas Handlow alias Burnell sonne to the said Maud and John by a fine in the Court levied and that John Lovell was next heire of the said Maud and her first-borne sonne by her first husband and afterwards the said Nicolas was summoned among other Lords to the Parliament by reason of the fine aforesaid and not the said John Lovel who was next heire Edward Burnell Baron of Holgate Philip Burnell Baron of Holgate Maud Burnell heire to her brother John Lovell the first husband John Lord Lovell Iohn Lord Lovell John Handlow second husband Nicolas Handlow Baron of Holgate Hugh Handlow alias Burnell Baron of Holgate Thomas de Beauchamp the elder Earle of Warwick by a fine levied 18. E. 3. entailed the Mannour and Castle of Warwicke with divers other possessions to himselfe for terme of his life the remainder whereof to Guy his eldest sonne and to the heires males of his body issuing for want of such heires the remainder to come to Thomes Beauchamp brother to the foresaid Guy and to his heires males of his body issuing c. And afterwards the said Gâ—y died without heires male of his body leaving two daughters and heires living afterward the said Earle dyed and the said Thomas the sonne entred into the Castle and Mannour aforesaid with other the premisses and was Earle of Warwick by reason of the entaile aforesaid notwithstanding that Katharine daughter of Guy and next heire to the said Thomas the elder was living 30. yeers after his death Thomas Beauchampe Earl of Warwick Guy de Beauchampe first son obiit ante patrem 30. E. 3 Katharine lived in 21. R. 2 Elizabeth Tho. de Beauchampe Earle of Warwicke by reason of the entail obiit anno 1. H. 4 Rich. Beauchamp Earl of Warwick obiit 17. H. 6 William Beauchamp de Beauchamp L. of Aberganey obiit 12. H. 4 Richard de Beauchamp Earl of Warwicke obiit 9. H. 5 Richard Earle of Arundell by a fine 21. E. 3. entailed the Castle Towne and Mannor of Arundell with other Lands to him and to his heires Males begotten of the body of Ellenor his wife By vertue of which entaile John Lord Matrovers Earle of Arundell after the decease of Thomas then Earle which died without heire Male although the sisters of the said Thomas possessed divers Lands and honors of the which the said Thomas died seised in Fee simple was Earle of Arundell Richard Earle of Arundell Richard Earle of Arundell obiit anno 21. R. 2 Thomas Earle of Arundell obiit anno 3. H. 5 Elizabeth married to Tho. Mowbray Duke Norfolk Jane Lady of Abergany Married to Lewthall John Arundell Knight Lord Matrovers John Arund Lord Matrovers obiit 6. H. 4 Io. Arund L. Matrovers obiit 9. H. 5 Io. E of Arun. by reason of the entail Thomas Lord Barkley was seised in his demesne as of fee of the Castle of Barkley and Mannour c. and a fine levied in the Kings Court 23 E. 3. of the aforesaid Castle Mannour c. to him for terme of his life remainder to Morrice his sonne and to the heires males of his body issuing with other remainders as aforesaid the which said Morrice had issue Thomas Lord Barkley and Iames Barkley Knight which Iames dyed in the life of his brother leaving Iames his sonne and heire living After the said Thomas Lord Barkley died Anno 5. H. 5. leaving Elizabeth his daughter and heir married to Richard Earle of Warwick after whose death Iames his Nephew on the brothers side entred into the Lands Castles and rem ' aforesaid by virtue of the entaile and was summoned among the Barons to the Parliament as Baron of Barkley 9. H. 5. which Elizabeth died in 1. H. 6. Tho. Lord Barkley Morrice Lo Barkley Tho. Lord Barkley Eliz. married to Rich. Earle of Warwick Sir Ia. Barkley died before his brother Iames Lo. Barkley by reason of the entaile Thomas Lord De la ware died seised in his demesne as of fee taile to himselfe and to the heires males of his body issuing by reason of a fine levied in the time of his ancestors of the Barony De la ware with divers other lands in other counties and died 5. H. 6. without heires of his body and Reignold West Knight of the halfe blood was next heire by reason of the entaile aforesaid and was summoned to the Parliament by the name of Reignold Lord De la ware Knight although Iohn Griffith was heire generall of the aforesaid Thomas De la ware being of the whole blood as appeareth by the genealogie ensuing Iohn Lord Delaware son of Roger. Iohn Lord Delaware Roger Lord Delaware Elisabeth daughter to Adam L. Wels. Iohn Lord De la ware died without issue Thomas Lord Dela ware died without issue Elisabeth daughter to the Lord Mowbray hâ—s second wife Iohn Griffin heire generall to the Lord Delaware Sir Reignold West Lord De la ware by the entail Katharine married to Nicolas Latimer Katharine married to Griffin Iohan married to Tho West Knight John de Vere Earle of Oxford seised in his demesne as of Fee taile to him and his heires Males of his body issuing of the honour and county of Oxford with divers other Lands Anno 18. H. 8. died without heires of his body and his three sisters were his next heires generall but Iohn de Vere his next heire Male as appeareth was Earle of Oxford by reason of the said entaile and none of the three sisters obtained Dignity Richard de Vere Earle of Oxford died 4. H. 5. Iohn de Vere Earle of Oxford deed 1. E. 4. John de Vere Earle of Oxford died without issue 4. H. 8. George de vere Knight Iohn de Vere Earl of Oxfo died without issue 18. H. 8. Eliz. married to Sir Antho. Wingfield Knight Ursula married to Edm. Knightley Esq Dorothy married to Nevill Sir Robert de Vere
to mention one case which I read in the bookes of the common Law concerning the discent of a title of honor whereof the Ancestor had estate in fee simple There is a maxime in the Law Possessio fratris de feodo simplici facit ' sororem esse heredem the possession of the brother in fee simple doth make his sister to bee his heire But if a man by any of the three names before mentioned be created into a title of dignity to him and to his heires for ever and hee hath issue a sonne and a daughter by one Venter and hath also a sonne by a second wife afterwards the Father dyeth and his eldest sonne entreth into all his Fathers inheritance and also enjoyeth the title and name of dignity which his Father had but dyeth without issue In this case the dignity shal goe and discend unto the younger sonne though hee be but of the halfe blood unto him that last enjoyed that name and title by discent and shall â—ot discend unto his sister of the whole blood and yet in this case shee should only bee her brothers heire of all his fee simple Lands and the reason and cause hereof is because Possessio fratris because the possession of the brother is the maine and sole cause which may give title to her his sister which fayleth in this cause of dignity For it cannot be said that her eldest brother was in possession of his title of honour no more then of his blood For the diguity was inherent to his blood so that neither by his owne Act neither by any act to be done by another did hee gaine any more actuall possession if so it may be termed then by the law did discend unto him and therfore the younger brother may well by the Law make himselfe heire unto his Father of the honour though hee cannot be heire unto his brother so that this word Possessio which is none other then pedis positio a fixing of the foot extendeth only unto such things of which a man may by his entry or other act and doth require actuall possession Cooks 3. part 42. Ratclâ—ffs case And having thus much dilated concerning the creations and other things incident to the degrees of Nobility I cannot with silence pretermit something to declare concerning that sufficiency and ability of estate which the Law doth require to be in every of them according to their severall dignities The Common Law alwayes will that decorum and conveniency be observed considering the charges and expences appertayning to these degrees and dignities being offices of principall service to the King and the Realme both in time of warre and peace as hath beene said hath ordered that each of them have a convenient portion and value of lands of inheritance for the support of their honours which supplyes are as sinewes conjoyned unto the same For in vertue and in riches as Aristotle counselleth all the old Nobility consisted and which two as Ecclesiastes teacheth maketh a good accomplement for saith he Vtilior est sapientia cum divitiis conjuncta Lamberts Perambulation of Kent â—68 Therefore a Knight ought to have 20. l. land by the yeâ—re a Baron 13. Knights fees and a quarter an Earle 20 knights fees and this doth appeare by the Statute of Magna Charta cap 2. For alwayes the fourth part of such Revenues which is by the Law requisite to the dignity shall be paid to the King for reliefe as for example The reliefe of a Knight is five pound which is the fourth part of 20. l. which is the revenue of a Knight see the Statute hereof 1 E. 2. and the reliefe of a Baron is a 100. markes which is the fourth part of his revenues that is to say 400. markes a yeare which doth include 13. Knights fees and a quarter and the reliefe of an Earle is a 100. l. which is the fourth part of 400. l. which is the revenue of an Earle and it appeares by the Records of the Exchequer that the reliefe of a Duke amounteth unto 200. l. and by consequence his revenue ought to be 800. l. per annum and this is the reason in every of our bookes that every of the Nobility is presumed in our law to have sufficient free-hold Ad sustinendum nomen onus and to what value these ancient rents in time of H. 3. Edw. 1. at this day do amount unto every man knoweth not Cooke 7. part 33. And in cases of decay of Nobility and meanes as Senatores Romani rereamoti senata as Senators of Rome were removed from the Senate so sometimes they are not admitted to the upper house in the Parliaments though they keepe the name and title of dignity still Sir Thomas Smith de reipub Angl. 221. And by a Statute made 31. H. 8. ca. 10. The Lords have their places prescribed after this manner following viz. these foure the Lord Chancellour the Lord Treasurer the Lord President of the Councell and the Lord Privie Seale being persons of the degree of a Baron or above and in the same act appointed to sit in the Parliaments and all assemblies or Councell above all duties not being of the blood royall viz. the Kings brother Vncle Nephew and these sixe the Lord High Chamberlaine of England the Lord Marshall and the Lord Admirall of England the Lord Steward of the Kings House and the Lord Chamberlaine of the Houshold by that act to be placed in all assemblies of Councell after the Lord Privy Seale according to their degrees and estates so that if hee bee a Baron then hee is to sit above all Barones or an Earle above all Earles and so likewise the Kings Secretary being a Baron of the Parliament hath a place above all Barones and if hee bee a man of higher degree hee shall sit and bee placed according thereunto Priviledges incident to the Nobility according to the Lawes of England VVHen a Peere of the Realme and Lord of the Parliament is to be arraigned upon any treason or fellony whereof he is indicted and whereupon hee hath pleaded not guilty the King by his Letters Pattents shall assigne some great and sagâ— Lord of the Parliament to bee High Steward of England for the day of his arraignement who before the same day shall make precept to his Sergeant at armes that is appointed to serve him during the time of his Commission to warne to appeare before him 18. or 20. Lords of the Parliament or 12. at the least upon the same day and then at the day appointed when the High Steward shall bee set under the Clothe of State upon the arraignement of the Prisoner and hath caused the Commission to bee read the same Sergeant shall returne his Precepts and thereupon the Lords shall bee called and when they have appeared and set in their places the Constable of the Tower shall bee called to bring his Prisoner into the Court who then shall bring his Prisoner to the Barre and the High
of one and twenty yeares he shall be in ward but if the King had made him Knight in the life of his Father he should not have beene in ward after the death of his Father neither for the lands descended or for his marriage though he be within age Cooks 6. part 74. in Druries case Nobility and Lords in reputation onely THere are other Lords in reputation and appellation who neverthelesse are not de jure neither can they enjoy the priviledge of those of the Nobility that are Lords of the Parliament The sonne and heire of a Duke during his fathers life is onely by curtesie of speech and honour called an Earle and the eldest sonne of an Earle a Baron but not so in legall proceedings or in the Kings Courts of Iustice Brook Treason 2. But the King may at his pleasure create them in the life of their Ancestors into any degree of Lords of the Parliament Cook 8. part 16. b. A Duke or other of the Nobilitie of a forraigne Nation doth come into this Realme by the Kings safe conduct in which the Kings said Letters of Conduct he is named Duke according to his Creation yet that appellation maketh him not a Duke c. to sue or to be sued by that name within England but is onely so reputed But if the King of Denmark or other Soveraigne King come into England under safe conduct he during his aboad in England ought to bee stiled by the name of King though hee have not merum imperium out of his owne Kingdome yet he shall retaine honoris titulos Cook 7. part 15. b. sequentia All the younger sonnes of the Kings of England are of the Nobility of England and Earles by their birth without any other Creation and onely Lords in reputation And if an English man be created Earle of the Empire or of other title of honour by the Emperour he shall not beare the title in England and therefore is an Earle onely in reputation A Lord of Ireland and Scotland though he be a Postnatus is not a Lord in England in legall Courts of Iustice though he be commonly called and reputed a Lord. NOBLE VVOMEN ALthough Noble women may not sit in Parliament in respect of their sexe yet they are in the law Peeres of the Realm and all or most of the Prerogatives before mentioned which to Noblemen are belonging doe also appertaine to them Cook 8. part 53. But the opinion of some men hath been that a Countesse Baronesse or other woman of great estate cannot maintaine an action upon the statute de scandalis Magnatum because the statute of 2. R. 2. cap. 5. speaketh but of Prelates Dukes Earles Barons or other Nobles and other great men of the Realme and of the Chancellour Treasurer Clarke of the Privie Seale Steward of the Kings house Iustice of the one Bench or of the other great officers of the Realm by which words they conceive the meaning of the makers of that statute was onely to provide in that case for Lords and not for women of honour Crompton Justice of Peace 45. b. Also if any of the Kings servants within his Check-roll doe conspire the death of any Noble man it is not felony within the compasse of the statute 3. H. 7. cap. 13. Honourable women are of three sorts By creation by Descent or by Marriage King Henry the eighth created Anne Bullen Marchionesse of Pembrook and so may the King create any woman into any title of honour as to his Highnesse shall seem good As the King by by his Letters Patents openly read in the Parliament did create Widow the sole daughter of late Baron of Abergavenny Baronesse De le Spencer Cambden 63. 6. Noble women by descent are those to whom either the lands holden by such dignity do descend as heir and they are said to be honourable by tenure or those whose Ancestors to whom they are heires were seised of an estate descendable unto them in their titles of Dukedomes Earldomes or Baronies or those whose Ancestors were summoned to the Kings Parliament for thereby also an inheritance doth accrue to their posterities Noble women also are those who do take to their husbands any Lord or Peere of the Realme although they of themselves were not of any degree of Nobility Fortescue de laudibus legum Angliae fol. 100. Question and doubt hath been made whether if a man be summoned to the Parliament and afterwards die without issue male the dignity and title of honour may descend to the heire female and many arguments have beene made pro contra in that which at this time â— doe purposely omit because I have before discoursed thereof in the title of Barons in this Treatise Concerning the title of honour descendable to the heire female by reason of a tenure in her Ancestor there need no more doubt to be made than of offices of honour the which doe much import the publike wealth and being of estate of inheritance doe descend to the heire female if there be no heire male as the office of high-Constableship of England challenged in the time of H. 8. by the Duke of Buckingham and judged by the advice and resolution of the Judges as by a note of that case extant whereof my Lord Dyer in his Reports hath a memoriall is most evident Dyer 283. b. Kellaway 6. H. 8. 170. b. which descended to the daughters of Humphrey de Bohun Earle of Hereford and Essex as afore is declared the office of a Lord Steward descended to Blanch daughter of Henry Earle of Lancaster in whose right John of Gaunt her husband enjoyed the same The like may be said of the office of Earle Marshall which descended by an heire female unto the house of Norfolk all which offices are as unfit to be exercised by a woman as it is unfit for a woman to be summoned to the Parliament as Baronesse by writ as before is written And when the title of honour doth descend to a woman if question in Law doe arise betweene the noble woman and any other person whether she be of that degree of noblenesse or no the issue shall be tried by the Record thereof and by the Kings writ it shall be certified and not by a Jury of twelve men even as it should be in case her Ancestors had beene party Cooks 6. part 53. 7. part 15. Although the Lawes of this Realme regularly doe make all the daughters where there are no sonnes equally to inherit Lands and Tenements and to be but one heire to their Ancestor yet it is not so in the descent of dignities and titles of honour for inheritances concerning matters of honour being things in their nature entire paticipating of superiority and eminency are not partable amongst many and therefore must of necessity descend unto one and that is to the eldest daughter sister aunt or cosin female inheritable where there is no heires males that may lawfully challenge the same and so in
he shall be out of ward and custody both for his Land and for his body vide Cook 6 part 74 a. And therfore it is provided by the statute of Magna Charta Cap. 3. Ita tamen quod si ipsâ— dum infra atatem fuerint fiat miles nihil ominus terra remaneat in custodia dominorum suorum So that although such an heir within age be made a Knight and therby to this purpose is esteemed of full age yet the Laws shall remain in the custody of the Lord till his age of 21. years by the provision of the said Act. Quere if the son and heir of the Tenant of the King by Knight-service c. be made Knight in Paris by the King of France whether he shall be out of wardship after the death of his Father or no for therby he is a Knight in England Cook 7. par a. 2. E. 4. fo b. tamen vide Cooks 6. par 74. b. Mention is only made of Knights made by the King himself or by his Lieutenants in Ireland But when the King doth make an heir apparent within age of a Tenant by Knights service a Knight in the life time of his Ancestor and after the death of his Ancestor the said heir being within age shall in this case be out of ward and shall pay no value for his marriage neither shall the Lord have the custody of the Land for in that case by the making of him Knight in the life of his Ancestor he is made of ful age so that when his Ancestor dyeth no Interest in the body nor in the Land shall invest but the Knight may tender his livery as if he were of full age and in this case the King shall have primer seisin as if he had bin 21. years old at the time of the decease of his Ancestor and not otherwise Cooks 8. part fol. 171. a. for the statute of Magna Charta doth not extend unto it For the purpose of it doth extend only when the Heir is in ward infra etatem is made Knight then remaneat terra in Custodia But when the Heir is in ward being Knight in the life of his Ancestor then the Custody cannot remain or continue which had never any inception or essence Also when the Heir after the death of his Ancestour within age is made a Knight if after tender made unto him he within Age doth marry else-where yet he shall not pay the Forfeiture of his Marriage For by the making of him Knight he is out of ward and custody of his Lord for then he ought to be sui juris and may imploy himself in Feats of Arms for defence of ths Realm and therfore may not be within the Custody or keeping of another but none shall pay any Forfeitute but when after refusall he doth marry himself during the time when he is under the Custody or keeping of his Lord. And this doth appear by the statute of Merton cap. 6. Si maritaverit sine licentia Domini sui ut ei auferat Maritagium suum c. Which Words cannot be understood when he is out of Ward and Custody no more then when he is married after his age of one and twenty years Note hereby may appear that the King may present his Grant or other Lords of the double value by Knighthood yet in such a Case presently after the Heir is made Knight after the Death of his Ancestour the Lord may have a Writ de valore Marigii for the single Cooks 6. part 74. and 75 and note Plowden f. 267. Also by the ancient Common-law of this Realm if a Villain be be made a Knight he is immediatly enfranfranchized Olanvile lib. 5. cap. 5. f. â—7 and Bracton lib. 4. cap. 198. b. Or if a Ribauld or man of base Birth and Condition had strucken a Knight he should by the ancient Laws have lost his hand wherwith he offended Britton 19. in his appeales But in France it was judged antiently that when a Lord of a villain had Knighted his villain being a Gentleman he became Free and had the Honor lawfully but if another Lord had Knighted him nothing had bin wrought by it For none could mannue him but the Lord and till Mannumission or till Knighthood had civill Freedome for his ground he was not capable of it except by the King only vide Seldens Titles of Honour fol. 318. It was enacted in Parliament Anno 6. Ioh. Regis in hec verba Rex vicecom c. Sciatis quod consensum est cum assensu Archieporum Comit. Baronium omnium fidâ—lium urum Angl. quod Novem milites per totam Angl. invenient decimum militem bene paratum equis Armis ad defensionem Regni nostri vide Cook before his ninth Book b. There hath ever bin and still is great use of the service of Knights even in civil affairs and concerning matters of Iustice as in a Writ of right which is the highest writ in the law for the trials of titles touching the inheritance of lands the Tenant is at election to have his tryall by a grand assize or else by battle if by the great assize then Wâ—â—t de magna assiza Elegenda shall be taken out And upon the return of that Writ those four Knighâ—s nominated must appear Gladiis cinctis Dyer 79. f. 103. If the Tenant make his election by Battle each parties are to choose their Champions and the Court shall award the Battle and the Champions shall be a mainprise and sworn to perform the Battle at a certain day in the Term and idem dies shall be given to the parties at which day and place a List shall be made in an even and plain ground their Squadrant that is to say every square 60. foot East West North and South and the place or Court for the Justices of the Common Pleas without and upon the Lists furnished with the same Cloths which belong to their Court at Westminster and a Barre there shall be made for the Sergeants at Law and the Robes of the Justices and Sergeants shall be of Scatlet with their Coifes as it was Anno 13. Eliz. and then was made Proclamation with three O. yes c. and the Demandant was first solemnly demanded and did not appear Wherupon the Mainprise of the Champion was demanded to bring forth the Champion of the Demandant who came to the place apparelled with red Sandalls upon his black Armour bare legged from the knee downwards and bare headed and bare Arms to the Elbowes being brought in by a Knight namely by Sir Ierome Bowes who carryed a Red Baston of an Ell long typt with horn and a Yeoman carrying the Target made of double Leather and they were brought in at the North side of the Lists and went about the sides of the Lists and then came towards the Bar before the Justices with their solemn Congies and there was he made to stay on the Southside of the place being the right side of
Eliz. cap. 18. he nor any other need to make his purgation but shall be forthwith delivered out of prison by the Justices sed quare Poulton 202. b. By the Jmperiall Constitutions Nobiles non torquentur in quibus plebeij torquerentur nobiles non suspendantur sed decapitantur and so it is almost growne into a Custome in England by the favour of the Prince for rare is it to have a Nobleman executed in other forme yet Thomas Fines Lord Dacres of the South in 33. H. 8. and Lord Sturton 4. Mar. were hanged Brooke Iury 48. Jn the first yeare of the late Queene Eliz cap. 1. in the Acts of Parliament for the uniformity of Common Prayer c. there is contained this proviso and be it enacted and ordained that all the Lords of Parliament for the third offence above mentioned shall bee tryed by their Peeres and not by any Ecclesiasticall Courts reade the Statute at large At the Common Law it was lawfull for any Nobleman or ignoble to retaine as many Chaplaines as hee would for their Instruction in Religion but by a Statute made 21. Hen. 8. cap. 13. A restraint was made and a certaine number onely allowed to the Nobility and such Chaplaines for their attendance have Immunities as by the Statute at large may appeare viz Every Archbishop and Duke may have sixe Chaplaines whereof every one shall or may purchase Lycence or dispensation and take receive and keepe two Persoâ—ages or Benefices with cure of Soules and that every Marquesse or Earle may have five Chaplaines whereof every one may purchase Lycence or Dispensation and take receive and keepe two Parsonages or Benefices with cure of Soules and that every Viscount and other Bishop may have foure Chaplaines whereof every one may purchase Lycence and receive have and keepe two Parsonages of Benefices with cure of Soules as aforesaid And that the Chancellour of England for the time being and every Baron and Knight of the Garter may have three Chaplaines whereof every one shall now purchase Lycence and Dispensation and receive have and keepe two Benefices with cure of Soules read the Statute at large And forasmuch as retaining of Chaplaines by Lords of great estates is ordinary and neverthelesse some questions in Law have beene concerning the true understanding of the said Statute J thinke it not impertinent to set downe some subsequent resolutions of the Judges touching such matters If a Bishop be translated to an Archbishop or a Baron to be created to an Earle c. yet within this Act they can have but onely so many Chaplaines as an Archbishop or Earle might have for although he have divers dignities yet he is still but one selfesame person to whom the Attendance and service should be done so if a Baron be made a Knight of the Garter or Lord Warden of the Cinque-Ports hee shall have but three Chaplaines in all sic de similibus Also if such an Officer allowed by the Statute to have one two or more Chaplaines doe retaine accordingly and after he is removed from his Office in this case he cannot be now non-resident or accept of a second Benefice if his Compliment were not full before his remaining and yet in that case it behoveth the Chaplaine to procure a non obstante otherwise he may be punished for his non-residency So if an Earle or Baron doe retaine a Chaplaine and before his advancement his Lord is attainted of Treason as it was in the Case of the Earle of Westmerland after the said Attainder such a Chaplaine cannot accept a second Benefice for though his Lord be still living according to nature yet after the Attainder he is a dead Person in the Law and therefore out of the case to have Priviledge for himselfe or for his Chaplaines If a Baron have three Chaplaines and every one of them have two Benifices and after the Baron dyeth yet they shall enjoy those benefices with cute which were lawfully setled in them before but in this case though the said Chaplaine be resident upon one of his Benifices yet now he is become unpunishable for being non-resident upon the other for cessante causa cessat effectus the same Law is if a Baron be attainted of treason or Fellony or if any Officer be removed from his Office Et sic de similibus vide Actons Case Cooke 4. part Fol. 117. for all those matters A Baron or others of degree of Honour doe retaine such number of Chaplains as are allowed by the Statute and after upon suite and request the said noble person doth retaine more Chaplaines In this Case they that are first retayned shall onely have priviledge nam qui prior est tempore potior est Iure so if a Lord doe at any time retayne more Chaplains then are allowed by the Common Law the lawfull number onely shall have priviledge and in this case which of them first promoted shall have priviledge and the rest are excluded for in equali Iure melior est conditio possidentes Jf a Nobleman doe retayne Chaplaines above the number at severall times if any of his first Chaplains die the next that was then retayned shall not succeed for his first retayner was void and therefore in this Case it doth behove him to have a new retayning after the death of the predecessour and before his advancement nam quod initio non valet in tractu temporis non convalâ—scit If a noble person retaine such a number of Chaplains as is by the Law allowed him but afterward upon some dislike or other cause doe discharge some of them from their attendance or service the Lord in this case cannot retaine others thereby to give them priviledge during the life of them so retained and discharged and the reason thereof is because the first Chaplaines were lawfully retained and by virtue thereof during their lives might purchase dispensations to have advantage according to the statute and therefore if the discharge of their service and attendance might give a liberty to the Lord to retaine others by such meanes the Lords might advance Chaplains without number by which the statute should be defrauded and the said statute must be construed strictly against non-Residents and Pluralities as a thing prejudiciall to the service of God and the ordinary instruction of the people of God These premises are to be read in Cooks 4 part fol. 90. Druries case By the statute of 3. H. 7. cap. 14. it is enacted as followeth viz. Forasmuch as by quarrels made to such as have been in great authority office and of counsell with the King of this Realme hath ensued the destruction of the King and thereby the undoing of this Realme so that it hath appeared evidently when the compassing of the death of such as were the Kings true subjects was laid the destruction of the Prince was imagined thereby and for the most part it hath growne and been occasioned by envie and malice of the Kings owne houshold-servants
and for that by the lawes of this land if actuall deeds were not there was no remedy for such false compassing imaginations and confederacies had against any Lord or any of the Kings Councell or any of the Kings great Officers in his houshold as Steward Treasurer Controller and so great inconveniences did ensue because such ungodly demeanours were not straightly punished before that an actuall deed was done For remedy whereof it was by the same statute ordained that the Steward Treasurer or Controller of the Kings house for the time being shall have full authority and power to enquire by twelve sad men and discreet persons of the Check-roll of the Kings honourable houshold if any servant admitted to be his servant sworne and his name put into the Check-roll of the houshold whatsoever he be serving in any manner office or roome reputed had and taken under the estate of a Lord make any confederacies compassings conspiracies imaginations with any person or persons to destroy or murder the King or any Lord of this Realme or any other person sworne to the King Councell Steward Treasurer or Controller of the Kings house that if it be found before the said Steward for the time being by the said twelve men that any such of the Kings servants as is aforesaid hath confederated compassed conspired or imagined as abovesaid that he so found by the enquiry be put thereupon to answer and the Steward Treasurer or Controller or two of them have power to determine the same matter according to the law and if hee be put in tryall that then he be tryed by other twelve sad men and discreet men of the same houshold and that such misdoers have no challenge but for malice and if such misdoers be found guilty by confession or otherwise that the said offence be adjudged felony and they to have judgment and execution as felons attainted ought to have by the Common law In the statute made in the second yeare of H. 5. cap. 10. authority is given to the Sheriffe and other the Kings Justices for the better suppressing of Riots and Routs c. to raise Posse Comitatus the power of the County and the same liberty doth the Common law give in many other cases Neverthelesse may not the Sheriffe upon such authority command the person of any Nobleman to attend that service but if the Sheriffe upon a Supplicavit against any Nobleman in that case doe returne that he is so puissant that he cannot or dare not arrest him the Sheriffe shall be grievously amerced for such his returne For by the writ under the Great Seale of the King commandement is to all Archbishops Bishopsi Dukes Earles Vicounts and Barons and to all liege men of the County to be ayding unto him in that which to his office appertaineth And therefore by intendment no person whatsoever can resist the execution of the said writ of the King Also the Sheriffe may by his discretion levie three hundred men if need be to aid him in that behalfe Cromptons Justice 134. 3. H. 7. 1. Cookes 5. part 71. b. The words of the great Charter of the Forrest in the eleventh Chapter are as followeth Every Archbishop Bishop Earle or Baron comming to us at our commandement and passing by our Forrest it shall be lawfull for him to take one beast or two by the view of the Forrester if he be present or else he shall cause one to blow a Horne for him that he seeme not to steale our Deere This statute doth speake but of Archbishops Bishops Earles and Barons yet if a Duke Marquesse or Viscount which be Lords of Parliament be comming towards the King by his commandement they also shall have the benefit of this article So if the King send to any of the Lords aforesaid to come to his Parliament or send to him by writ of Subpoena to appeare in the Chancery before his Councell or send for him by his missive or by Messenger or Serjeant at Armes in all these cases he shall have the benefit of this statute because they came at the Kings commandement The same Law is if a Scire facias goe out of the Chancery or Kings Bench to a Lord of the Parliament but if such processe goe forth for a Lord to appeare before the Justices of the Common Pleas or before the Barons of the Exchequer and he commeth upon that he shall not have the benefit of the statute for he doth not come unto the King and the words be veniens ad nos and all the processe which are made out of the Chancery and Kings Bench are quòd sit coram nobis and so are the Processe out of the Star-chamber Also Lords which come to visite the new King after the death of his Father though not sent for shall have the priviledge and so note this statute is a warrant dormant to such Lords which is also to be understood as well of their returning homewards as of their comming towards the King Manwood Forrest Lawes cap. 181. Cromp Courts 167. b. Note this statute doth give licence to kill or hunt in the Kings Parks though the letter of the statute be transientes per forrestam nostram Passing by our Forrest Cromptons Court 168. Note in certain cases the Law doth give priviledge to the Sons or Brethren of Noblemen though themselves be not of that degree Vide 21. H. 8. cap. 13. 7. E. 6. cap. 5. CERTAINE CASES WHEREIN A LORD of the Parliament hath no PRIVILEDGE THe King may by his absolute power commit a Nobleman to prison durante beneplacito suo from whence he cannot be discharged by bail or mainprise or by the common writ de homine replegiando And by the same power it is if a Noble person bee committed to prison by the Kings Councell for they are incorporate to his Highnesse and do command as with the Kings mouth And the same law is if a Noble be committed to prison by the absolute commandement of the Kings Judges sitting in their places of Judicature Stamf. lib. 2. cap. 18. fol. 72. 1. as you have before when the Prince himself was committed by the chiefe Justice sitting in the Kings Bench and hee was not baileable Also if a Capias and an Exigent may bee awarded by the Iustices out of their ordinary Jurisdiction against such persons upon an Inditement for Felony or Treason as common experience sheweth The statutes of Praemunire are 27. E. 3. cap. 1. 16. R. 2. cap. 5. upon which statutes an Abbot which was a Lord of the Parliament was impleaded and he did pray priviledge to appeare by an Atturney and by the rule of the Court he could not because the statute is generall and against it but by speciall writ out of the Chancery he might And so in case where he doth pray to be received For if a Lord of the Parliament holding lands of another in Fee simple doth forbeare or with-hold to doe and pay his services due to his