circumcisionis Domini xx d. But so called I trow when compounded for in money otherwise upon the same ground Malt-peny as the old Customal of the same manour frequently nameth it So called peradventure in relation to some greater rent or service arising and paid out of the same land that this at some other part or season of the year I guesse hereat by an old Customal of Charing manour where indeed I found it so and so Les-gavel quasi Lesle-rent or Lesle-service I take it to be the same that in the Customals and Rentals of some other manours I find written Lesyeld and Lesgeld unlesse it be mistaken for the next Leaf-gavel thus occurring in an old Accompt-roll of the Church of Canterbury Et de xii l. iij. d. ob de annuo redditu assis cum Leafgabulo ad terminum S. Martini which I conceive to be the same with what in a like Record of Hathewolden now Halden manour in Kent is called Lef-silver Et de xviij d. de Lef-silver in Hathewoldum The old Custumal of Tenham manour in Kent calling it Lyefyield thus explains it Tenentes de Waldis non possunt arare terras suas ab equinoctio autumpnali usque festum beati Martini sine licentia Et ideo reddunt annuatim dimidiam marcam ad festum S. Martini sive fuerit Pessona sive non Et vocatur Lyes-yeld Whereby it seems to be a tribute paid by certain Wealdish Tenants for liberty to plow their grounds during a certain season of the year viz. tempore Pessonae which because of some prejudice that might thereby redound to the Lord in his Pawnage was not permitted without his leave Gabulum mellis as the old Rentals of Chistlet manour in Kent seem to term what some ancient Accompt-rolls of Otteford and other manours call Hunigaved both one and t'other signifying Rent-honey Item de Weregavel vj. d. aliquando tamen plus aliquando minus Thus in the Custumal of the Canterbury Cathedrals manour of Leisdowne in the Isle of Shepey It seems to be a rent paid in respect of Wears or Kiddels to catch fish withall pitch'd and plac'd by the Sea-coasts and until Magna Charta forbade it in some rivers too whereof see further in Sir Hen. Spelmans Glossary verbo Kidellus and in Sir Edw. Cokes Institutes part 2. pag. 38. and elswhere In an Accompt-roll of the manour of Reculver in Kent anno 16. Edw. 3. this service in the charge there thus occurrs Idem respondet de 814 dimid ped clausur hayag fac circa manerium ex consuetudine unde de Twygavel 200. I meet with it elswhere also but with explanation no where Taking liberty of conjecture I conceive it to be some double kinde of service by the Twy preposed as elswhere Twysket an imposition upon the Tenants of Aldington manour by Romney mersh for maintaining the Sea-coasts there and other like defences against inundations is termed Duplum as thus Computus de duplo Wallae quod vocatur Twysket So the Accompt-roll of that manour in the sixth year of St. Edmunds Archbishoprick Is termed of our learned Glossarist verb. Berewica by Tributum hordeaceum elswhere viz. verb. Gabella by Redditus hordeaceus You shall finde in the 60th of King Ina's Laws in Mr. Lambards Archaion If it were not Rent-barley I should take it for the Drincelean occurring as in the last chapter of the Leges Presbyterorum Northumbrensium in Sir Hen. Spelmans Councils pag. 502. So also in the 87th of King Cnutes Laws in the Archaion and in this latter place rendred in the old Version in Brampton just as Oryncelan mistaken for Drincelan in the old Glossary at the end of Hen. 1. Laws by Retributio potus If so it seems to be the same with what was afterwards called Scot-ale whereof you may read in Matth. Paris the Charter of the Forest Bracton the Mirroir and elswhere King Hen. 2. in his charter to the citizens of Canterbury acquits them of it Ita quod saith he Vicecomes meus Cantuar. vel aliquis alius Ballivus Scotalam non faciet It 's sometimes called Potura and was a contribution by the men and Tenants towards a Potation i. e. a Drinking or as some yet speak an Ale provided to entertain the Lord or his Bailiffe withall coming to keep Court or the like raised by a proportion or rate more or lesse according to the better or meaner condition In an old Custumal of Southmalling manour in Sussex in that part of it intituled Bortha de feld I read as followeth Item si Dominus Archiepiscopus fecerit Scotall infra boscum quilibet terram tenens dabit ibi pro se uxore sua iij. ob vidua vel Kotarius j. d. In the Extent of the manour of Terring to give you another instance anno 5. Edw. 1. this Scotale service is thus remembred Lewes Memorandum quod praedicti tenentes debent de consuetudine inter eas facere Scotalium de xvj d. ob ita quod de singulis sex denar detur j. d. ob ad potandum Bedello Domini Archiepiscopi super praedictum feodum Bracton saith It is sometimes called Filctale sol 117. b. which our learned Glossarist in voce correcting reads Fildale and is in some sort followed by Sir Edw. Coke Institut part 4. pag. 307. With the Varia lectio before Bracton I should rather read it Gildale and then indeed as it comes neerer the other Scot-ale so with that better answers to our present Bere-gafol Gild Gafol and Scot being as it were Synonyma and univocal Observed to be alwayes paid by the Tenant per avail to the mesne Lord not to the chief and thence called in some old records and deeds Foris-gabulum quasi extra vel praeter gabulum quod Domino capitali debetur just like the French mans Surcens Will you have an example John then the son of Richard at Horsfald by his deed dated anno 1242. gives to Warin of Stablegate a parcel of land to be holden to him and his heirs or to whomsoever he shall give sell or assigne it a clause without which by the account of those elder times land was not alienated from the proper heirs paying to the Prior and Covent of Christ-church Canterbury Lords it seems of the Fee certain annal rent and hens and to the Feossor and his heirs j. d. yearly de forgabulo c. Some other instances of this kind might be added but I must contract passing over Metegavel whereof mention is made in the old Glossary at the end of Hen. 1. Laws and there in Latine rendred Cibi gablum Now a word or two of Gavelet This I must tell you was no Rent or Service but betokeneth a rent or service with-held denied or deteined causing the tenements forfeiture to the Lord whence those words of Fleta reciting the Statute
in that at Rochester intervening and happening in the interim of those two Statutes the one of Uses made anno 27. the other of Wills inacted anno 32. Hen. 8. a time most proper for the Custome if any such in being by iâ—s fruits the immediate free devise of lands by will at pleasure without that mediate collateral and by-way that periphrasis of Feoffments and their Uses which now was out of doors to assert and shew it self all which in my opinion do plainly tend to the dis-proof of this custome of devising lands in Kent by will before that Statute of wills As for example 1. In the will of Thomas Bourne of Tenterden dated 3. May 1538. in the Archdeacons Registry at Canterbury lib. 21. quatern 7. And where saith he there is an Act lately made to avoid uses of wills yet my mind is that Clement my son shall have my house and shop in Tenterden with th' appurtenances to him in fee. And that John Bourne my son shall have all my lands lying in the parish of Hawkherst to him and his heirs in fee. And I give to my said son John xl s. upon condition that he will abide and stand to the dividing and order of my lands as my mind is before expressed And if he will not stand to and abide the said order and division but to shift his part throwly then I will the said xl s. shall remain and be had to Alice my wife Also I give to Clement my son iij. l. upon condition that he do stand to and abide the division and order of my lands and tenements according as my mind is before expressed And if the said Clement de refuse my said order and division of my lands and shift his part throwly then I will the said iij. l. shall remain and be had to Alice my wife c. Argument Had there been a Custome for devising lands by will what needed that notice to be taken here of the Act for avoiding uses of wills And why is the Testator put to it thus to work and wage his sons to consent to that partition and division of his lands by a Legacie in money to be forfeicted upon their refusall and for choosing to shift or divide throughly as a thing in their power by Law which could not be had there been any such Custome 2. In Thomas Sayer alias Lamberds will of Feversham dated in May 1538. in the same Registry and Book quatern 9. some lands are devised away from the two female Inheritrices to be sold and a partition also made between them of other lands Whereupon a Legacie in money is given to the heirs at Law to wage them to consent and condescend to that devise and division in these words Item I will and bequeath to Isabel and Margaret my two daughters to each of them 6. l. 13. s. 4. d. to be paid to them by Benet my wife in money or money-worth in four years next after my decease upon condition that my said two daughters their Heirs and their Assigns to suffer this my present will and testament to take effect according as I before have willed And if my said two daughters their Heirs and their Assigns do this refuse that my said will can take none effect according as I before have willed then I will my said two daughters nor their Assigns shall take no benefit nor profit of none of my bequeaths to them before bequeathed c. Argument The same Quaere here as before viz. What needed this conditional Legacie in money had it not been free to them and in their power and choice whether his will for the sale of some land and for the division of other should take effect or not 3. In John Crowmers will of Pogylston Esquire dated in February 1538. in the same Registry book and quatern this clause to our purpose is remarkable Item I will that each of my three daughters Benet Elizabeth and Grace have 13. l. 6 s. 8. d. of such debt as their husbands do ow me so that their husbands be content that such lands as I have purchased go according to my devise and will or else not c. Argument The like Quaerie here as before Where also note that although he mention a devise of lands by will yet no such will is either proved or registred because probably null and void in Law The like whereof may be supposed of Sparcklins will of Thanet dated in March 1539. in the same book and Registry quarern 14. where his mansion place at Bronston is said to be bequeathed to his son John whereas no such thing appeareth by the approved will nor is any land at all devised by it The like may be said of Cacherells will of Norborne dated anno 1537. in the same Registry and book quatern 8. where some Legacies in money are charged upon a house there said to be given to the party charged and his wife whereas no such gift appeareth by the will 4. In Sarlys will dated anno 30. Hen. 8. in the same Registry and book quatern 11. where he maketh mention of his three daughters we have this clause Item I will that he my brother shall have my part of my house at Wy called Jancocks during his life if that may be suffered by the Law c. 5. In the will of William Byx of Linsted dated 1538. in the same Registry lib. 22. quatern 1. occurrs this passage I will and bequeath all the profits commodities fermes rents of all my lands whatsoever c. unto my brother germane Laurence Byx unto the timos that my sons Laurence and Nicholas come to the age of 22. years c. Also to my daughters marriage 10. l. to be raised out of those profits c. and paid by my brother Laurence Provided alway if the Law will not suffer nor admit my brother Laurence to enjoy and take up the fermes c. of my lands then I will that each of my said sons c. shall pay the said 10. l. unto my said daughters marriage c. 6. Thomas Hunt of Pluckly in his will dated in the year no moneth 1540. probably some time before the Statute of Wills that year made in the same Registry book and quatern gives to his wife the issues of his lands for life and after her death the lands themselves to his son John charged with some Legacies in money to his younger brother Anthony and his children but with this Proviso If this my will saith he stand not good and effectuall in the Law then I will that my said messuage and premisses after the death of my said wife shall remain to my said two sons I. and A. and to their heirs for ever c. 7. The like clause to this occurrs in the will of John Hubberd of Westerham dated the 23th of July 1537. in the Bishop of Rochesters Registry viz. Also if it do please God to visit my wife and all my children with death then
or the like unnatural at the least and far fetcht if not violently forc'd For first admitting Kind to signifie a male-child in the Dutch or Belgick tongue as it doth not more than a female being a word common to children of either Sex Knecht indeed with them as Cniht with our Ancestours the English-Saxons is of that signification yet is not this kind of land so restrained in point of descent onely to the males but that as in the case of land descendible at the Common Law the females in their default that is where the males are wanting are capable of succession to it and in the same way of partition with the males Nay is any of the sons dead in the fathers life time leaving a daughter behind him such daughter shall divide with her uncles in this land What then shall we admit kynd to signifie the issue be it male or female as indeed it doth either coming of the Saxon or old English cennan or cennian parere to bring forth whence with them the word or participle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for the first-begotten or first-born 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for the onely begotten 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 terrigena one that is born or bred of the earth yet is not this land so tied to the issue but that in default thereof i. e. where that is wanting such as be in the transversal or collateral line as in other lands descendible at the Common Law may and do inherit it as for instance when one brother dieth without issue all the other brethren may and do inherit as doth their respective issue too in case of their default jure repraesentationis but with this restriction in the nephews case succeeding with their uncle viz. that the descent is then in stirpes not in capita Neverthelesse it goeth not as the Irish Gavelkynd to all the males of the same linage for in this as in other inheritances propinquior excludit propinquum nor yet neither to all the next in one line of kinred as they pretend that are for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 taking cyn to signifie kindred as indeed it doth for then brothers and sisters both being alike neer in degree should equally inherit a thing it seems allowed by the old German custome witnesse what we have from Tacitus Haeredes successoresque sui cuique liberi c. not restraining the succession to the male issue as neither doth the Civil Law whereas we know that as by the Feudal Customes abroad where males are the females are excluded from succession so by the Common Law of England women or females shall not partake with males according to that rule laid down in the Statute called Praerogativa Regis cap. 16. Foeminae non participabunt cum masculis which by the way is understood onely of such as are in equal degree But doth â—yn or kynd here intend and denote a mans issue the Gavelkynders children What may we say then to a conveyance of land in Gavelkynd to a Guild or Corporation aggregate of many suppose an Hospital as an instance of that nature shall be produced by and by they are a dead hand how then is the etymologie in that case justified Where 's the kynd the parties issue here to make good the derivation But since by occasion mention is made of such a gift or conveyance to strangers from the proper issue or heirs let me thus far further adde that in case it be called Gavelkynd from debitum vel tributum soboli i. e. due or given to the issue as some are of opinion how comes it then to passe that as before the Statute of Wills Gavelkynd land might by deed or other lawful conveyance and that Dominâ— in this case inconsulto and invito too contrary to the nature of what with the Feudists is properly termed Feâ— be freely given or sold away from the heir by the custom to a meer stranger contrary to the old Common Law of England except in some few cases as in Frankalmoigne or in marriage with a mans daughter a reasonable part might be given with some limitations and distinctions between Land of Inheritance and Purchase as now since the Statute of Wills if not before as some of late seek to perswade us a matter which I shall reserve alâ—iori indagini it may be and daily is by devise of will and testament How is the next heirs right to this land preserved when there is that freedome of giving or devising it away Or how can this liberty that etymologie consist Yet further doth not Mr. Lambard somewhere say that no Gavelkynd partition could be challenged but onely where the custome of division had prevailed and that Gavelkynd was not tried by the manner of Socage-services but onely by the touch of some former partition If â—o no land then could properly be called Gavelkynd wherein this custome of partition had not yet obteined what shall then be thought of those new created Tenures in Gavelkynd whereof until the Statute of Quia emptores terrarum examples are very obvious and frequent in the old Records both of the Cathedral at Canterbury and of the neighbour Abbey of St. Augustines and elswhere affording many ancient grants of land in Gavelkynd to what original shall the name there be referred to any customable partition nothing lesse for where can that be found in Gavelkynd-land of novel Tenure for want of that competencie of precursory time of them necessarily presupposed to frame the custome in who conceive the name taken from such accustomable partition Moreover if partition were the thing that gave name to Gavelkynd then should all partible land wheresoever be so called but there is in parts abroad out of Kent partible land not called Gavelkynd Ergo c. For the assumption see the Stat. 32. Hen. 8. cap. 29. purposely made to change the customary descent of the land of Osweldbeck Soke or Lordship in Nottingham-shire And what doth Bracton intimate lesse in his sicut de Gavelkynd vel alibi ubi terra â—st partibbilis ratione terrae Adde hereunto that the word as to the main part of it Gavel frequently occurs in the old records of some manours out of Kent sometimes simply but for the most in composition for example Gavel-erth Gavelate Gavel-lond Gavel-man Gavel-swine Gavel-wood Gavel-rod c. of which more anon And shall the same thing contrary to that rule of Law â— 1. ff De rerum permutatione diverso jure censeri For I suppose none will render it there being out of Kent and where no Gavelkynd partition taketh place Gife-eal Nor will this derivation any better stand with Gavel where it helps to the composition of some words here used in Kent in former times at least besides that of Gavelkynd such as are all or most part of those afore-remembred to which I may adde Gavel-rip Gavel-ote Gavel-sester Gavel-bred Gavel-bord Gavel-timber Gavel-corn
to themselves a quit-rent as it were in signum dominii that is they reserved to themselves the service and granted to the Hospital the usum fructum or they granted the utile dominium to the Hospital and reserved the directum to themselves So that whereas Bracton and others make mention of a tenure in feodo quoad servitia non in dominico referring to the chief Lord and of another in feodo dominico non in servitio relating to the Free-holder the former may here be referred to the Feoffors the latter to the Feoffees in this deed But this Parergon And now to wind up all concerning this first Proposition and not to enlarge with any further instances wherein I might be infinite for asserting this truth of our Gavelkynds derivation Gavelkynd we see is the lands right name whose Etymologie was never wrested to Gife-eal-cyn whose signification of Censual Rented land or Rent-service land was never questioned till that within our fathers memories one and all by a kind of errour jure veluti successionis transmitted to them run a head in a wrong and mistaken derivation PROPOSITION II. The Nature of Gavelkynd-land in point of Partition DIsallowing then Gavelkynd as to the name of it to be derivative from Partition our next enquiry shall be if on the contrary Partition ow it self to Gavelkynd or to what other cause Before I further enter into which research or offer any resolution to the Quaere give me leave to preface it with certain rules grounds and principles in this case fit to be premised You are then desired to take notice that here in England we acknowledge no land no inheritance partible or divisible but what is so either first by Law as in the case of Females succeeding for lack of Males whether in Knight-service land or Socage which in this point differ not or what secondly is so by Custome as in our present case of Gavelkynd and such like no parceners of land I say in point of inheritance or succession but either according to the course of the Common Law or by Custome as termed by Littleton and our more modern books the same in effect with what of elder time in Bractons language are called 1 Ratione personarum 2 Ratione rei vel terrae In the next place let me adjoyn what in this point of Partition is delivered by those two ancient and famous Sages of our Law Glanvill and Bracton whereof the former speaketh thus Cum quis ergo hereditatem habens moriatur si unicum filium heredem habuerit indistinctè verum est quod filius ille patri suo succedit in toto Si plures reliquerit filiâ—s tunc distinguitur utrum ille fuerit miles sive per feodum militare tenens aut liber Sokemannus quia si miles fuerit vel per militiam tenens secundùm jus regni Angliae primogenitus filius patri succedit in totum ita quod nullus fratrum suorum partem inde de jure petere potest Si verò fuerit liber Sokemannus tunc quidem dividetur hereditas inter omnes filios quotquot sunt per partes aequales si fuerit Socagium id antiquitus divisum salvo tamen capitali messuagio primogenito filio pro dignitâ—te aâ—sneciae suae ita tamen quod in aliis rebus satisfaciâ—t aliis ad valentiam Si vero non fuerit antiquitus divisum tunc primo genitus secundum quorundam consuetudinem totam hereditatem obtinebit secundùm autem quorundam consuetudinem postnatus filius heres est Item si filiam tantùm unam reliquerit quis heredem tunc id obtinet indistinctè quod â—e filio dictum est Sin autem plures filias tunc quidem indistinctè inter ipsas dividetur hereditas sive fuerit Miles sive Sokemannus pater earum salvo tamen primogenitae filiae capitali messuagio sub formâ praescriptâ— c. Thus Glanvill harmoniously followed and almost verbatim of Bracton whose words on this argument are these Si liber Sockmannus moriatur pluribus relictis haeredibus participibus si haereditas partibilis â—it ab antiquo divisa haeredes quotquot erunt habeant partes suas aequales si unicum fuerit messuagium illud integre remaneat primogenito ita tamen quod alii habeant ad valentiam de communi Si autem non fuerit hereditas divisa ab antiquo tunc tota remaneat primogenito Si autem fuerit Sockagium villanum tunc consuetudo loci erit observanda Est enim consuetudo in quibusdam partibus quod postnatus praefertur primogenito è contrario c. Hereunto let me subjoyn in the third and last place that common principle amongst us and obvious in our books viz. that prescription in Gavelkynd-land as it is not needful so neither is it good The reason is whereof I pray take notice with me that as Mr. Lambard hath it the custom of Gavelkynd is general spreading it self throughcut the whole Shire into all lands subject by ancient Tenure unto the same such places onely excepted where it is altered by Act of Parliament and therefore 5. Edw. 4. 8. and 14. Hen. 4. 8. it is said that the Custome of Gavelkynd is as it were a Common Law in Kent Having thus premised I shall now make it my endeavour to shape such a resolution or answer to the propounded Quaere as may consist with these principles And briefly my answer here is negative viz. that Partition doth not owe it self barely to Gavelkynd either ex vi termini by reason or force of that denomination or ratione rei from the nature or condition of the land that property alone of the lands being Gavelkynd or so called not sufficing to render it partible First as for the name the term that that will in no wise bear it is I conceive a thing sufficiently cleared in our Discourse upon the first Proposition wherein the term is vindicated from that mistaken construction by the errour of latter times obtruded on it nor can such a derivation any way consist with the premised principles Partition in Gavelkynd-land from the term or denomination of it being reducible to none of the there assigned causes of Partition As inconsistent also with those causes and grounds of partition that dichotomy or bipartite distinction of partible land into 1 that by Law and 2 that by Custome is the attributing that property of partition in Gavelkynd to the nature or condition of the land there being no mention of any such third sort of partible land to be found in our Books If it be replied Yes surely for Bracton is expresse for a partition ratione reâ— vel terrae in the places above quoted that especially where he saith as fol. 374. a. sicut de Gavelkind vel alibi ubi terra partibilis est ratione terrae Such indeed are his words and withall 't is not to be denied that such is the nature
Frank Fee then being opposed to Ancient Demesne which is Socage cannot it self be Socage Nor will Bractons distinction of Socage into liberum and villanum applied to that difference in Mr. Lambard of free and base Socage by which the one should consist of money and the other of base services be warranted as himself there observes from the ensuing Inquisition some lands being therein denoted to be of Gavelkynd-nature which neverthelesse do yeild none other but money alone and none there of that nature charged with works besides that of Suit of Court improperly called Works as not coming under the notion either of Manuopera or Carropera to which double head all works of this kind are wont to be referred Hence let none perswade themselves that Gavelkynd-land was not or by its nature is not liable to Works for albeit that 66. of King Ina's Laws in the Archaion seemeth to counter-distinguish Gafâ—l and Wâ—rk and though moreover Gafolland and Werkland occurr in some manours out of Kent as of a distinct and different nature yet both servile and opposed to what there is called terra libera denoting I suppose Free Socage yet most certain it is that both Gablum and Opera do often meet and are found in Gavelkynd-land Witnesse the old Custumal of Monkton manour in Thanet belonging to the Church of Canterbury mentioning the particulars of what servile works the Tenants there stood charged with for the 18 Swolings so many plough-lands I take it holden of the Monks in Gavelkynd Witnesse also this passage in King Johns Charter made to Hubert the Archbishop for the changing gavelkynd-Gavelkynd-land into Knights-Fee at large exemplified by Mr. Lambard Peramb pag. 531. Xenia Averagia alia opera quae fiebant de terris iisdem convertantur in redditum denariorum aequivalentur Witnesse in the third and last place not to multiply instances in a case so cleer an Inquisition found after the death of Isabella de monte alto widow sometime of Orpington recorded in a Lieger of that Cathedral whereof expect a copy in the Appendix Scriptura 10. 'T is true indeed at this day and time out of mind haply from Richard the seconds time such servile works properly called Villein-services have been as they still are intermitted or rather quite ceased insomuch as all our Gavelkynd-land in point of service now differs nothing from Free Socage as it stands described and defined of Bracton being such ubi fit servitium in denariis to use his own words all the Tenants burthen his whole service being onely servitium crumenae pecuniary such as payment of money for rent suit of Court and such like nay in many grants of land in Gavelkynd that I have seen I find no tie at all upon the Tenant no covenant or contract between his Lord and him to require of him any such base services there being ut communiter and regularly a reservation onely of rent in money suit to his Court or the like yet I must tell you as a reason hereof in my judgement that though Gavelkynd in the genuine sence sound land letten for gable cens or rent consisting chiefly in denariis whence in an old Custumal of Eastry manour in Kent I read In eodem manerio mutati sunt octo Cotarii pro Gavelkende Medlefâ—rm tenet unum messuagium tres acras quae solent esse Cotar modo reddit xl d. de gablo and so divers more which haply will be better understood if I add what occurrs in an old Accompt-roll of the Archbishops manours for the year 1230. in Charing Bailives receipt Et de xiij s. iiij d. de fine Cotariorum ut Coteriae suae ponerentur ad redditum yet commonly upon such grants in Gavelkynd the Tenant pareâ—d with such a sum of money to his Lord in gersumam i. e. in consideration of that grant and by way of Fine as may seem equivalent to the base services otherwise imposeable and to have been charged upon that land and upon the Tenant in respect thereof or if not probably as in Gavelkynd-land by vertue of King Johns fore-mentioned Charter turned into Knights-fee he had his rent inhanced and augmented to an equivalent value of his services to be redeemed the cause in chief of the excuse of Gavelkynd-men from base services of latter times and at this day being I conceive no other than the Tenants buying them out and consequently the change of the same as Littleton hath it of Socage in general into money by the mutual consent of Lord and Tenant whereof expect some examples to be presented in the Appendix Scriptur 11 and 12. In the mean time have here an instance or two taken from some old Accompt-rolls of the Archbishops manours of this and that summe paid received for enfranchising the land from customes and services and changing it into Knights-fee whereof in the last-remembred Accompt-roll and in the receipt of Ceâ—ring now called Charing manour there Et de ij s. ix d. ob de incremento redditus Thomae de Bernfeuld de termino Sancti Johannis ut terra sua de caetero sit libera de consuetudinibus per feodum militis Et de xiiij d. quad de incremento redditus Thomae de Bending ut terra sua sit libera per feodum militis de termino S. Johannis And so some others there as also in Maidstone and other Archiepiscopal manours and such may well be reckoned among lands of that sort which in a copy of the book of Aid cited by Mr Lambard are noted to be holden in Knights-service per novam licentiam Archiepiscopi But to return to our Gavelkynd which if not extensive to Free Socage they may seem to stand in need at this day of some other character to keep them unconfounded than Bracton in the definition and description of the latter doth propose in regard the service of both equally consisteth in money To recapitulate now what hath been delivered concerning partition in Kentish Gavelkynd-land It is as hath been shewed neither from the name nor from the nature of the land alone nor from prescription nor yet from any particular custome that this property there proceedeth but partly from the nature of the land and partly from custome not I say a particular one but a general custome extended throughout the whole County in censual land or land letten for Cens or what is all one with it Gavel or Gafol to say holden in Fâ—ef or Inheritance Roturier as called in Normandy and other parts of France the Antiquity whereof and how beginning in Kent and why more general there than elswhere shall be the argument of our next Discourse PROPOSITION III. The Antiquity of Gavelkynd-custome in point especially of Partition and why more general in Kent than elswhere MAster Lambard inclines in his opinion to conceive this custome brought hither out of Normandy by Odo Earl of Kent and bastard brother to King William the Conquerour and that we
matter I conceive of the case I would ask then if our Kentish Gavelkynd-land be partible quatenus Gavelkynd I expect no other than an affirmative answer If so and admitting withall that such property in Gavelkynd-land owes it self to a custome accompanying land of that nature yet I suppose it shall enjoy that property no longer than the land it self continues to be Gavelkynd which some hold it is not being once returned and come back again into the Lords hands the King especially being Lord that granted it out in Gavelkynd or of whom it formerly held in Gavelkynd because then as cessante causâ sollitur effectus so by reason of the unity of possession the Usu fructus I cannot well English it being consolidated and made one with the property that property of being censual land which Gavelkynd denotes and which cannot be intended of any land holden in Demesne and not in service ceaseth and is quite extinguished there being required to make the land censual a censual Tenant one that holdeth by censual services such as here is none especially in the Kings case when once the land is come home again reduced to its first principles and re-united to what like Fief is opposed to service-land the Lords In-land or Demesne-land as in the case of a common Lord or to the Crown à quo omnia feudamoventur â—riuntur the Fountain whence all Tenures are derived as in the Kings case from whence by the letting it out in Gavelkynd it was formerly severed To this purpose see Petri Gregorii Tholosani Syntag. Jur. univers lib. 6. cap. 5. num 11. But of this also hitherto for I hasten to an end PROPOSITION V. Whether before the Statute of Wills 32. and 34. H. 8. Gavelkynd-land in Kent were deviseable or not IN answer whereof holding with those which resolve it in the negative howbeit for my part not studio partium but veritatis amore I shall oppose to such as hold the contrary what arguments are brought against them and their opinion in a case of Mr. Halls of Kent verbatim as I find them published in print which here follow with their title Reasons and authorities to prove that Gavelkind-lands in Kent are not nor were anciently deviseable by Custome FIrst it is a rule in Law that an Assise of Mortdancester doth not lie of lands which are deviseable by Testament c. and this appears by divers books as namely 4. Edw. 2. Mortdanc 39. 22. Assiz 78. and Fitz. Nat. Brevium 196. 1. But it appears by Bracton fol. 276. b. that an Assize of Mortdancester will lie of Gavelkind lands in Kent and so it appears by divers ancient Records quod vide in Itinere Johannis de Berewicke c. Anno 21. Edw. 1. Copia fol. 1 7 22 24. in Itinere H. de Stanton Anno 6. Edw. 2. Copia fol. 1 8 9 10 13. By which it appears plainly that an Assize of Mortdancester lies of Gavelkind lands in Kent But an Assise of Mortdancester doth not lie of lands within the city of Canterbury because lands are there deviseable by Custome as it appears in dicto Itinere H. de Stanton fol. 3 4 6. And it is evident that in the city of Canterbury which was anciently part of the county of Kent there was a special custome used to devise lands lying within the liberties of the city and to prove their wils in the Court of Burgmote in the same city But there needed no such Custome if all the Gavelkind lands in Kent had been deviseable c. Also the most part of the ancient Wills of Gavelkind lands in Kent before the Statute of Uses did mention Feoffees of the lands devised c. as appears by the Register-books of Wills at Canterbury and at Rochester whereby it doth appear that the Devisors were Cestâ—y que uses and not owners of the land devised and although some wills of land make no mention of Feoffees yet there were Feoffees of the same land as will appear by the deeds of Feoffment thereof and twenty to one do mention Feoffees c. Also Sir John Fineux chief Justice de R. B. Sir Robert Read chief Justice de C. B. and Sir John Butler Justice c. devise their lands in Kent before the Statute of Uses and make mention of Feoffees c. which had there been a Custome to devise no question they had taken of it c. Also many ancient deeds of Feoffment of lands in Kent referr to Wills sc Dedi concessi c. A. B. omnia terras tenementa c. ad opus usum perimplendi ultimam voluntatem meam c. Also there are wills to be found of lands in diverse other Counties of this Realm whereby lands were devised before the Statute of Uses and no mention made of any Feoffees as appears in the Register-books of the Prerogative Court and in diverse other places and yet without doubt they bad Feoffees seised to their uses c. or else they could noâ— there devise the same Also the houses and lands in Cities and Burroughs which were deviseable by Custome were reckoned inter catalla sua but it were strange that all the Socage Lands in Kent which are conceived to be Gavelkind should be reckoned inter catalla c. And in the Register fol. 244. there are fourteen several Writs of Ex gravi querela and none of them make mention of any County c. nor of Gavelkind but secundum consuetudinem Civitatis or secundùm consuetudinem Burgi c. And if Gavelkind Lands be deviseable by Custome c. the Devisee can have no Writ of Ex gravi querela because there is none before whom the Action or writ should be brought c. Also Mr. Lambard in his Perambulation writing of the Customes of Kent maketh no mention of any Custome to devise lands nor the Treatise called Consuetudines Cantiae in the old Mag. Charta fol. 147. which without doubt they would not have omitted if there had been any such Custome c. Also between the Statutes of 27. H. 8. of Uses and the Statutes of 32. of H. 8. of Wills there were very few Wills made of lands as appeareth by the Register-books before mentioned and the most of such Wills as were then made being but few in number do make mention of Feoffees Also the common practice ever since the Statutes of Wills hath been such that if a Will be made void for a third part by a Tenure in Capite of part of the land c. that third part shall descend to the Heir and the Devisee shall not have it and this appears by special Liveries in the Court of Wards proving the same and by diverse witnesses that can prove the same to be so c. And in Sanders case of Maidstone in Anno 9. Jacobi Regis all the lands were devised by Will and after the Will was avoided for a third part by reason of a Tenure in capite of a small
part of the land and the third part of all the residue of the lands being Gavelkind did escheat to the King for want of Heir which land is ever since enjoyed under the Kings title by escheat And John Wall upon a trial recovered against White the Devisee Whereby it is evident that Gavelkind Lands in Kent were never deviseable by Custome and so it was agreed per curiam Pasch 37. El. in C. B. in Halton and Starthops case upon evidence to a Jury of Kent it was then said that it had been so resolved before and there it was said per curiam that Fitz. Nat. Brev. 198. l. is to be understood where there is a special custome that the Land is deviseable c. And he that shall conclude upon that place of Fitz Nat. Brev. 198. l. that all Gavelkind Land is deviseable c. may as well conclude that all Lands in every City and Burrough in England is deviseable which is not so as appeareth by Mr. Littleton who saith that in some Burroughs by custome a man may devise his Lands c. And if Gavelkind Lands were deviseable by custome c. Then a man may devise them by word without writing as it is agreed in 34. H. 8. Dyer 53. for a man may devise his Goods and Chattels by a Will Nuncupative so may he likewise devise his Lands deviseable by custome because they were esteemed but tanquam catalla c. and it would be a mischievous thing if all the Gavelkind in Kent should be deviseable by word onely To these arguments and objections against the custome certain answers and exceptions by the learned Counsel of the adverse party have been framed and returned in behalf thereof reducible to three heads which to avoid all just suspicion of partiality and prejudice wherewith some zealous advocates and contenders for the custome have been and may again be ready to asperse me I shall here subjoyn together with such answers and arguments by way of reply as I have received from the learned Counsel of the other side in further and fuller refutation of theirs who endeavour to uphold the custome The learned Counsels arguments in behalf of the Custome FIrst they deny the old book of 4. Edw. 2. Fitzh Mortdancester 39. â—o be Lâ—w. But an Assise of Mortdancester lies of land deviseable if it be true that his Ancestour died seized unlesse it appears that the Defendaut claims by some other title But if the Defendant plead that the land is by custome deviseable and was devised unto him it is a good barr of the action Secondly They rely much upon the book of Fitzherb Natura Brevium fol. 198. which sayes that a Writ of Ex gravi querela lies where a man is seised of lands or tenements in any City or Burrough or in Gavelkynd which lands are deviseable by will time out of mind c. whence they inferr that all Gavelkynd-lands are deviseable by custome Thirdly They cite the Treatise called Consuetudines Cantiae in the book called old Magna Charta and Lambards Perambulation of Kent fol. 198. that lands in Gavelkynd may be given or sold without the Lords licence and they interpret the word given to be by will and the word grant to be by deed The Reply to the fore-going Arguments by such as stand in opposition to the Custome AS to the first Objection against the Argument taken from the Assise of Mortdancester they reply thus First they maintain that the Custome alone without an actual Devise is pleadable in abatement to an Assise of Mortdancester as well as the Custome with an actual Devise is pleadable in barr for which there is not only that book of 4. Edw. 2. but also Bracton lib. 1. fol. 272. Ubi non jacet Assisa mortis antecessoris among his pleas in abatement of the Writ having before treated of pleas in barr to it Cadit Assisa sayes he propter consuetudinem loci ut in Civitatibus Burgis c. and 22. Assis pl. 78. where upon the like plea the Writ was abated and Fitzherb Nat. Brev. fol. 196. I. whose authority they think strange to be denied in a matter of Law wherein he was a Judge and yet so strongly relled on in a matter of fact and custome in a place whereto he was a stranger and so was it practised and allowed in Itin. Johan de Stanton 6. Edw. 2. And the reason given by the book why such a custome is pleadable in abatement to this Writ is because the suggestion of the Writ may be true that the Ancestour died seised c. and yet the heir have no title where the lands are deviseable And it is the property of this Writ that the dying seised must be traversed and though the Tenant plead the Feoffment of the Ancestour or other matter in barr that is not matter of Estoppell to the heir as a Fine Recovery c yet must he traverse the dying seised and the Jury shall be summoned and charged to inquire if the Ancestour die quo obiit seisitus fuit c. and so are the books of 9. Assis pl. 22. 27. Hen. 8. 12. Brooke Mortdancestor 1. Old Nat. Brev. fol. 117. and diverse others Nor is there any opinion to be found in any book of Law against that book of Fitzherb Mortdancestor 39. until the 15th of King Charles Launder and Brookes case Crooke lib. 1. fol. 405. obiter upon the trial of this custome 2. Admit that at this day the Law is held to be otherwise yet it appears by all the authorities aforesaid that in those times the Law was taken to be that the Mortdancestor did not lie where there was such a custome but it was a good plea in abatement of the writ And yet Assises of Mortdancestor were then frequently brought and maintained of lands in Kent as appears by Bracton and the books abovesaid 3. Whether the custome alone be pleadable in abatement or the custome with an actual devise be to be pleaded in barr they say it cannot be shewn if it can they challenge them to do it who would maintain the custome that it was ever pleaded one way or other either in abatement or in barr to any one of all that multitude of Assises of Mortdancestor brought at large in that County when in so small a City and County as Canterbury where indeed there is such a custom they shew it often pleaded to writs of Mortdancestor brought there before Roger de Stanton and other Justices in Eyre Secondly To the book of Fitzherb Nat. Brev. fol. 198. upon the writ of Ex gravi querela from whence the ground of this question sprung they answer that the sence and meaning of that book no lesse than the Grammar of it duly observed is no more then that the writ of Ex gravi querela lies there where lands in any City or Town or in Gavelkynd are deviseable by custome Not that all lands in Cities and Burroughs and in Gavelkynd are
I will that Richard Hubbard the son of William Hubbard of Lynsfield shall have my house and all my land if that the Law will suffer it paying therefore to every one of my sisters Agnes Katherine and Margaret three pounds six shillings and eight pence to be paid within the space of two years next after my decease 8. Nor is this passage lesse pregnant and pertinent to our purpose taken from the will of John Stace of Leigh dated the 18th of March 1538. in the same Registry And also I will that if the Kings last Act in Parliament will not stand with my wife to enjoy the one half of my lands I will then that mine Executour shall pay yearly to Agnes my wife xl s. during the term of her life and that to be paid quarterly at the four usual terms by equal portions c. Argument In these five last wills mentioned Sarlys Byx Hunt Hubberd and Staces what means that doubt and question in the Testators whether their devises of houses and lands were good or would hold and stand firm in Law had there been such a Custome and had not the Law been clear otherwise in this case as well in Kent as elswhere I observe also that in the interim of 27. and 32. H. 8. some few and indeed but very few wills there are in the Registers at Canterbury wherein lands are devised some with Feoffment and some without at least without mention made of any As for the former those with Feoffment I find the most of them dated though in or after the year 27. yet before the sixth of May 28. year of that King until when the Act was not to come in force Besides happily the Feoffment was made before the Statute and so could not be revoked as I conceive without the Feoffees consent As for the rest those without mention of Feoffees some of them were of our City Canterbury or the like places where by particular Custome they might devise Others happily had Feoffments although not mentioned If not they were no other I conceive than wills de facto or de bene esse made nor did or could otherwise or further operate inure or take effect than the interessed or concerned parties should give way with whom in those elder times times of more and greater regard and reverence to the will of the dead than the present the dying parent or kinsmans mind declared in his will bare so great a sway and did so much prevail as to perswade with them to renounce an advantage to themselves for the fulfilling of the deceaseds solemne and declared mind Besides it follows not that because such wills and devises are found therefore they passed and were allowed of as good and effectuall the contrary whereof is more than probable by the ifs and conditions found in other wills of those times arguing plainly the Testators distrust and doubt of the validity and consequently of the successe and effect of his devise whereof examples are laid down before Before I close and wind up all I have onely this to add by way of offer from the party opponent to this Custome and his Councel which as a matter much considerable I may not pretermit that whereas that abundance of wills wherein lands are devised without mention of Feoffees found and produced from the Registries both of Canterbury and Rochester is much insisted on in behalf of the Custome if from the Registries of any other Diocesse out of Kent where such devises never did nor could obtein until the Statute of Wills of equal circuit and extent to either of these the very same thing may not as truly be observed and a proportionable number and quantity of such kind of wills wills of lands devised without mention of Feoffees cannot be produced and consequently the argument and inference thence drawn for the Custome cluded and avoided they will sit down convinced and with their adversaries subscribe unto that argument An offer this in my judgement so fair ingenuous and plausible as not to be rejected of any but such as out of a cavilling spirit are resolved to turn the deaf ear upon all fair and equal proposals that I say not such as for maintenance sake make it their study quocunque modo to maintain their spurious interest But that I may not seem to be what indeed I am far from being any otherwise than in truths behalf a partisan in this businesse I shall forbear all further censure and if I may but have the Readers leave to make my Epilogue I shall with thanks to him for that and the favour of all his other patience quit the stage of my discourse on this whole argument and make my Exit Many other things offer themselves to his discourse that would treat of Gavelkind to the full but they are I take it mostly points of Common Law which because they are not only out of my profession but besides my intention too which was to handle it chiefly in the historical part and that no further than might conduce to the discovery of the Primordiae or beginnings of it I will not wade or engage any further in the argument lest I be justly censured of a mind to thrust my sicle into another mans harvest onely so a close craving leave to supply the common Kentish Custumal at the end of Mr. Lambards Perambulation with one clause which according to an ancient copy registred in a quondam book of St. Augustines Abbey at Canterbury now remaining with my very noble and learned friend Sir Roger Twysden is to come in at pag. 574 lin 2. after these words Que de lay est â—eâ—â— sans men viz. as that old copy gods on there Eâ—si home ou femme seit feloun de sei mesmes qeil sâ—y mesmes de gre se ocye le Roy aura les charteuz tuts niâ—nt l'an nele wast mes se heir seit tautost enherite sans contredit kar tout seit il feloun de sey mesmes il neyt my atteint de felonye Et clayment auxi c. as it follows in that printed Custumal Which clause as I conceive may be thus Englished And if a man or woman shall be a Felon of him or her self who shall kill him or her self of his or her own accord the King shall have all the Chattels and not the year and the waste but the Heir shall immediately inherit without contradiction for albeit he or she be a Felon of him or her self he or she is noâ— attainted of Felony Now craving pardon for what liberty I have taken to deliver my sence and give my conjecture on severall occasions here emergent I shall here cut the thred of this Discourse wishing that as I have not spared freely to speak my mind so that every man that pleaseth should assume the like liberty not susâ—ecting me so opinionate of mine own vote as to wish much lesse to beg least of all to importune any unwilling mans concurrence though haply unprovided