taken in only such as are convicted it would have been eluded and rendred ineffectual for want of a Conviction of the greater part of such ubiquitary Recusants The want of due consideration of this Statute in each of these parts of it hath occasioned some mistakes in those who have handled it And Wingate tit Crown numb 78. restrains both parts of it as well relating to those that have no certain place of abode as those whose place of abode is certain to Recusants convicted and makes no mention that this later sort must be in England at the time of their Conviction And in the late Additions to Dalton cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 14. 't is not only said that both sorts must be convicted but that they must be in England at the time of their Conviction which two things are only requisite in such who have a certain place of abode and not in the other sort who are within the meaning and danger of this Law without any precedent Conviction for Recusancy See more of this matter Licence to Travel Stat. 3 Jac. 5. and how a Popish Recusant shall be licensed to Travel out of his compass of five miles Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 5. Sect. 8. And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid Stat. Sect. 4. A Popish Recusant Copy-holder That every such Offender as is before mentioned which hath or shall have any Lands Tenements or Hereditaments by Copy of Court Roll or by any other customary tenure at the will of the Lord according to the Custom of any Mannor shall forfeit all and singular his and their said Lands Tenements and Hereditaments so holden by Copy of Court Roll or customary tenure as aforesaid for and during the life of such offender if his or her Estate so long continue to the Lord or Lords of whom the same be immediately holden if the same Lord or Lord or Lords be not then a Popish Recusant and convicted for not coming to Church to hear Divine Service but forbearing the same contrary to the Laws and Statutes aforesaid nor seized or possessed upon Trust to the use or behoof of any such Recusant as aforesaid And in such Case the same forfeiture to be to the Quéens Majesty Provided always Stat. Sect. 5. Popish Recusants shall notifie their coming and deliver in their names and be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That all such persons as by the intent and true meaning of this Act are to make their repair to their place of dwelling and abode or to the place where they were born or where their Father or Mother shall be dwelling and not to remove or pass above five miles from thence as is aforesaid shall within twenty days next after their coming to any of the said places as the Case shall happen notifie their coming thither and present themselves and deliver their true names in writing to the Minister or Curate of the same Parish and to the Constable Headborough or Tithingman of the Town and thereupon the said Minister or Curate shall presently enter the same into a Book to be kept in every Parish for that purpose Which shall be certified to the Sessâ—ons and enrolled there And afterwards the said Minister or Curate and the said Constable Headborough or Tithingman shall certifie the same in writing to the Iustices of the Peace of the same County at the next general or Quarter Sessions to be holden in the same County and the said Iustices shall cause the same to be entred by the Clerk of the Peace in the Rolls of the same Sessions Goods and Lands where not forfeited A Popish Recusant repairs to the place appointed him by this Act and keeps within his compass of five miles but doth not present himself or deliver in his name he doth not forfeit his Goods or Lands For there is no particular penalty inflicted in this part of the Act for that omission nor yet in the subsequent Branch for him that hath clearly twenty marks per annum in Freehold or Goods and Chattels worth forty pounds But yet such person may be Indicted for such neglect and fined upon the general words of the Statute which commands the thing to be done For where an Act of Parliament commands any thing to be done and inflicts no penalty an Indictment lies against the person who ought to do it for his neglect or omission Co. 2. Inst. 55. 163. Vide Cro. Hill 41 Eliz. 655. Crouthers Case Stat. Sect. 6. The penalty of a Popish Recusant of small ability offending against this Act. And to the end that the Realm be not pestered and overcharged with the multitude of such Seditious and dangerous people as is aforesaid who having little or no ability to answer or satisfie any competent penalty for their contempt and disobedience of the said Laws and Statutes and being committed to Prison for the same do live for the most part in better Case there then they could if they were abroad at their own liberty The Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament Assembled do most humbly and instantly beséech the Quéens Majesty that it may be further Enacted That if any such person or persons being a Popish Recusant not being a Feme Covert and not having Lands Tenements Rents or Annuities of an absolute Estate of Inheritance or freehold of the clear yearly value of twenty marks above all charges to their own use and behoof and not upon any secret trust or confidence for any other or Goods and Chattels in their own right and to their own proper use and behoof And not upon any such secret trust and confidence for any other above the value of forty pounds shall not within the time before in this Act in that behalf limited and appointed repair to their place of usual dwelling and aboad if they have any or else to the place where they were born or where their Father or Mother shall be dwelling according to the tenor and intent of this present Act And thereupon notifie their coming and present themselves and deliver their true Names in writing to the Minister or Curate of the Parish and to the Constable Headborough or Tithingman of the Town within such time and in such manner and form as is aforesaid or at any time after such their repairing to any such place as is before appointed shall pass or remove above five miles from the same And shall not within three months next after such person shall be apprehended or taken for offending as is aforesaid conform themselves to the obedience of the Laws and Statutes of this Realm in coming usually to the Church to hear Divine Service and in making such publick Confession and Submission as hereafter in this Act is appointed and expressed being thereunto required by the Bishop of the Diocess or any Iustice of the Peace of the County where the same person shall happen to be or by the Minister or
Verdict pass against him these are Convictions in Law but yet by these Convictions he forfeits nothing until Judgment nor shall the penalty of 20 l. per month run on or be appropriated to the King until Judgment be given By Convicted therefore is here to be understood convicted by Proclamation and Default or convicted by Verdict Confession c. and adjudged for so the word is here to be taken viz. for adjudged or attainted unless it be in Case of Conviction upon Proclamation And in such a sense it is to be taken in divers other Cases Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 Vide Stat. 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Sect. 5. When the 20 l per month is to be paid In such of the Terms of Easter or Michaelmas That is the Term of Easter or Michaelmas which shall first happen and not the next Easter and Michaelmas Terms both For the Recusant ought to pay the whole penalty for the time contained in the Indictment in the very first of those Terms next after his Conviction See for this Stat. 3 Jac. 4. Stat. 3 Jac. 4. Sect. 6. From what time the said penalty shall run on Stat. 23 Eliz. 1. 3 Jac. 4. For every month after such Conviction For what time the penalty of 20 l. per month shall run on after the Recusant is indicted and convicted and in what Cases the Informer and all others but the King shall be barred after such Conviction Vide Stat. 23 Eliz. cap. 1. antea Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 6. postea Office Take seize and enjoy But as to Lands and Tenements there must first be an Office found for the King for regularly before the finding of such Office Lands or Tenements cannot be seized into the Kings hands Co. 2. Inst 573. Co. 8. 169. Paris Stoughters Case Bro. tit Office 17. 55. Plowden 486. Nicholls Case By this Statute the Queen was to have and enjoy two parts of the Recusants Lands and Hereditaments nomine poenae or districtionis The two parts not satisfactory of the twenty pounds per month until he had in some other manner satisfied her of the whole forfeiture of the Twenty pounds per month incurred for his Recusancy And the profits of those two parts should not have been accompted to go to the payment of any part of the said debt or forfeiture For the Statute inflicted this forfeiture upon him meerly as a farther penalty for his neglect of payment of the Twenty pounds per month as was resolved by the two Chief Justices and Chief Baron Trin. 43 Eliz. in Gages Case Cro. Eliz. 845. 846. and by all the Judges The Law now altered in that point 3 Jac. at Russell House Jones 24. Standen versus Vniversity d'Oxon Whitton But now the Law is altered in this point by the Statute of 1 Jac. cap. 4. Vide the Stat. infra Sect. 4. Stat. 1 Jac. 4 All the goods A Recusant is Indicted and Convicted Recusants goods when forfeited and then fails of payment of the Twenty pounds per month yet his goods are not forfeited to the King by this Statute before seizure For the King hath his Election whether he will seize them or no. By Coke Chief Justice B. R. 12. Jac. Rolles 1. 7. C. 8. Cullom versus Sherman A Recusant lends money Recognizance forfeited and for security hath a Rent-charge granted him in Fee by Deed indented with condition of redemption and takes likewise a Recognizance for performance of Covenants in the said Indenture The Recognizance is forfeited and afterwards he is Indicted and Convicted of Recusancy and fails of payment of the Twenty pounds per month In this case the King shall have the Recognizance by force of this Act for when forfeited to the Recusant it is but a chattel personal What is given to the King by this word Goods and shall pass to the King by this word goods For in an Act of Parliament where the Offenders goods are given to the King all debts and personal Chattels and Actions are thereby given him as well as goods in possession And here in this Act as take and seize refer to two parts of the Recusants Lands and Tenements so enjoy refers to goods And the King shall enjoy the debt due by the Recognizance Nor doth it alter the Case for that the Recognizance was acknowledged for performance of Covenants in an Indenture concerning a Rent-charge in fee which seems to savour of the realty for it was originally for the loan and forbearance of money which is personal Co. 12. 1. 2. Ford and Sheldons Case If a man who is a Recusant take such a Recognizance in the name of another Recognizance taken in anothers name forfeited the King upon his Conviction shall have the Recognizance for when the Recusant was such at the time of taking the Recognizance and so continued until the time of his Conviction it shall be intended that it was done by Covin and that he took it in the name of another with an intent to prevent the King of the levying of the forfeiture and such Covin shall not bar the King Co. 12. 2. 3. the same Case The Kings grant If a Recognizance or Obligation be forfeited to the King by force of this Act he may grant it over as he may any other Chattel in Action under his private Seal Rolles 1. 7. C. 8. Cullom versus Sherman Hereditaments Rent Advowson in gross Hereditaments A Rent of Inheritance and an Advowson in gross are comprehended under this word But whether the King may seize such an Advowson as part of his two parts and present by vertue thereof since the Stat. of 3 Jac. c. 5. which gives the Presentation to the Universities Stat. 3 Jac. 5 Vide that Stat. infra Sect. 19. All other the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments liable to such seisure or to the penalties aforesaid It hath been much disputed whether Copyhold Lands are within this Branch of the Statute Copyhold Lands if seizable for regularly in Acts of Parliament which are Enacted for forfeiture of Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Copyholds shall not be forfeited but only Lands Tenements and Hereditaments which are such at the Common Law and not those which are such by custom only as Copyholds are And it was agreed in Heydons Case Co. 3. 8. That where an Act of Parliament alters the service or tenure or other thing in prejudice of the Lord there general words in the Act shall not extend to Copyholds Vide Savile 67. C. 138. And if the King should seize them by force of the general words here viz. Lands Tenements and Hereditaments the Lord would during the time they are in the Kings hands lose his Seigniory Customs and Services But yet it was held by Manwood Chief Baron and Baron Clark in the Case of Sulherd and Everet Mich. 30 Eliz. That Copyholds are within this Act and although Manwood seemed to grant that they are not within
the arrearages of twenty pounds monthly before such seizure due or payable shall ensue or be continued against such Offender so long as the same person shall continue in coming to Divine Service according to the intent of the said Estatute It was resolved by all the Judges Mich. 37 38 Eliz. That if a man had been convicted according to this Statute by Proclamation upon default and afterwards conformed himself Where Conformity discharges the penalty he should be discharged of the penalty due upon his Conviction notwithstanding these words and full satisfaction of all the Arrearages And the reason of this given by Coke Chief Justice B. R. in Dr. Fosters Case is for that this Statute saith That such Conviction should be as sufficient as if there were a Verdict recorded but 't is only a Judgment which converts the penalty into a Debt and not a Verdict And here all penalties are discharged upon Conformity unless such as are converted into a Debt But otherwise it would have been if there had been a Judgment against the Recusant upon Trial or Confession on the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 23 Eliz. 1. For then his Conformity would have come too late to have saved the penalty incurred by his Conviction For by the Judgment the penalty was converted into a Debt Rolles 1. 94. C. 41. Quaere tamen Whether these words here due and payable are to be understood due and payable upon a Judgment only However now by the Statute of 1 Jac. cap. 4. 1 Jac. 4. if the Recusant conform either before or after Judgment he shall be discharged of all penalties But the profits of the Recusants Lands taken before his Conformity shall never be restored Savile 130. C. 201. The profits not to be restored It hath been questioned upon this Statute Where the penalty is discharged upon the death of the Recusant where not if a Recusant convicted by Proclamation upon default had died before seizure of two parts of his Lands whether his Lands might have been seized after his death for the Arrearages of the 20 l. per month or if they were seized in his life time whether they should have been discharged after his death without payment of such Arrears And the Opinion of those who held that the seizure should neither ensue nor continue after his death but that the Arrears were discharged was principally grounded upon the aforesaid construction of this Statute viz. that due and payable extended only to Arrearages due and payable upon a Judgment and converted into a Debt But when the Recusant was convicted by Proclamation the penalty was never converted into a Debt and therefore when he died there were no Arrearages due in the sense of this Statute for the heir to pay And yet that by such Offender here is generally intended all Recusants convicted as well by Proclamation upon default as upon Judgment and the heirs of either should have had the benefit of this Proviso viz. That upon the death of the Ancestor no seizure should ensue or be continued only in the Case of a Judgment the Arrears were to have been paid But there seems now to be no further need of this Question for the Statute of 1 Jac. cap. 4. Stat. 1 Jac. 4. meets with both these Cases For if there be no seizure of the Recusants Lands in his life time the discharge of the heir will depend upon his Conformity and if there were a seizure the two parts shall continue in his Majesties possession till the Arrears are paid and satisfied Intailed Lands when discharged and when not But this is not intended of intailed Lands For without any aid of this Proviso if a Recusant Tenant in Tail be convicted by Proclamation upon default and dies neither any seizure for the Arrears of the 20 l. per month shall ensue after his death nor if they were seized in his life time shall the seizure be continued after his death nor is the Heir in Tail bound to pay any such Arrears But if a Judgment be had against the Recusant Tenant in Tail in his life time the Heir is bound in that Case of which see farther in Stat. 1 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 4. If a Judgment was had against the Recusant before the said Statute of 1 Jac. and he had died before seizure of the two parts of his Lands The question was whether after his death they might have been seized by force of this Statute of 29. for the Arrears of the penalty incurred in his life time For that the seizure here given is meerly in nature of a nomine poenae or penalty inflicted for his contempt in not paying the 20 l per month and should not have gone in satisfaction of the Debt But the Queen should have held the Land till the 20 l. per month were otherwise paid and satisfied And when this penalty of seizure was not executed in the Recusants life time by his death the contempt was gone and consequently the penalty inflicted for that contempt could not then be put in Execution Vide Lane 92 93. Beckets Case Ibid. 107. Halseys Case Stat. 1 Jac. 4. But now by the Statute of 1 Jac. 4. the seizure is not as a meer penalty for the contempt of non-payment but for the satisfying of the King of the Arrears of the 20 l. per month and the profits of the Land shall go towards the payment and satisfaction thereof so that now there is no question but the two parts of the Recusants Lands may be seized after his death Seizure after the Recusants death unless the Heir discharge himself by his Conformity Note Discharge upon Affidavit in all these Cases of seizure where the Land is to be discharged upon the death of the Recusant although an Affidavit be made of his death and a discharge obtained thereupon yet 't is a Rule in the Court of Exchequer Commission to enquire That a Commission shall be awarded first to enquire Savile 130. Case 201. And where by the said former Estatute Stat. Sect. 8. The third part of the forfeiture how to be disposed of the third part of the forfeitures for not coming to Divine Service is limited to the Poor Be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That it shall and may be lawful to and for the Lord Treasurer of England Chancellor and Chief Baron of the Exchequer for the time being or two of them to assign and dispose of the full third part of the twenty pounds for every month paid or to be paid into the Receipt of the Exchequer as is aforesaid for the relief and maintenance as well of the Poor and of the Houses of Correction as of impotent and maimed Soldiers as the same Lord Treasurer Chancellor and Chief Baron or any two of them shall order or appoint Any thing in the said Estatute made in the said thrée and twentieth year of her Majesties Reign mentioned to
lieu of the Twenty pounds per month And therefore the Resolution or Judgment said to be given in the Case of one Gray Anno 1. or 2. Jac. and cited in Beckets Case 8 Jac. Lane 93. and by Sergeant Bridgman in his Argument of Parker and Webbs Case 16 Jac. Rolles 2. 25. and applied thereunto viz. That if a Recusant convicted fails of the payment of the Twenty pounds per month the King shall have his Lands as a gage or penalty and the profits shall not go towards satisfaction thereof However it were true as the Law stood upon 29 Eliz. and before the making of this Act of 1 Jac. yet 't is not Law at this day nor could be applicable to either of those Cases of Becket or Parker and Webb which came to be debated long after this Act was made and the Law of 29 Eliz. altered in that point Vide Stat. 29 Eliz. cap. 6. Sect. 7. Where any such seizure shall be had c. This Relative such takes in both the seizures beforementioned viz. a seizure upon Indictment and Judgment thereupon by force of the Statute of 23 Eliz. and a seizure upon Conviction on Proclamation and default according to the Statute of 29 Eliz. And What seizure is here meant Stat. 23 Eliz 1 29 Eliz. â— as in both those Cases the Recusant who fails of the payment of the Twenty pounds per month shall have the benefit to discount the profits received by the King so the King shall in the like Cases of seizure retain the two parts in his hands after the Recusants death until the residue of the Debt or Duty due and payable to the King be satisfied Where this extends not to Intailed Lands Two parts of the Lands c. of any such Recusant This Clause extends not to Intailed Lands unless where there is a Judgment for the King against the Ancestor for his Recusancy And therefore if the Recusant convicted upon Proclamation and default be Tenant in Tail and two parts of his Lands be seized in his Life time for non-payment of the Twenty pounds per month and he die the arrears not being satisfied to the King yet the heir in Tail shall have the Land out of the Kings hands without payment of the arrears For that such Conviction is in the nature of a Verdict only Conviction upon Proclamation no Judgment and not of a Judgment as was held in Doctor Fosters Case Rolles 1.94 C. 41. And where a Statute gives to the King a seizure or forfeiture of Lands it shall not be intended of Lands in Tail unless it be expresly so appointed by the Statute or by force of some other Statute cooperating therewith In which Case the Intailed Lands may be charged by general words in the Statute which gives the forteiture or seizure An instance whereof we have in the Case of a Recusant Tenant in Tail Indicted Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 Convicted and Adjudged upon 23 Eliz. 1. for his Intailed Lands shall remain after his death in the Kings possession until the arrears be satisfied 29 Eliz. 6 33 H. 8. 39 and that by force of 29 Eliz. c. 6. and this Statute cooperating with the Statute of 33 H. 8. cap. 39. which charges the Lands of the heir in Tail with debts due to the King upon a Judgment had against the Ancestor Praemunire Stat. 16 R. 2. 5 But otherwise 't is in the Case of a Praemunire upon the Statute of 16 R. 2. cap. 5. which saith the Lands and Tenements of the Offender shall be forfeit to the King for there his Intailed Lands shall be forfeit during his life only And the reason is for that general words in an Act of Parliament unless aided by some other Act of Parliament shall never take away the force of the Statute de donis conditionalibus Co. 1. Inst. 130. 391. Co. 11.63 Godbolt 308. Lord Sheffeild and Ratcliffe Treason Stat. 26 H. 8. 13 5 E. 6. 11 And therefore in the Statutes of 26 H. 8. cap. 13. and 5 E. 6. cap. 11. which make Intailed Lands forfeitable for Treason the word inheritance was added any Estate of Inheritance which expresly denotes Lands in Fee Tail as well as Feesimple Now there being neither in this Act or that of 29 Eliz. any express appointment that the two parts of all Lands seized in the Recusants life time wherein he had any Estate of Inheritance shall after his death continue in the Kings possession nor no other Statute which charges the heir in Tail with the forfeiture due to the King upon Conviction by Proclamation and Default the general words here that his Lands Tenements c. shall continue in the Kings possession shall not inforce a construction in prejudice of the Heir in Tail who claims by the Statute de donis conditionalibus but where there is no Judgment the Recusants Fee simple Lands shall after his death satisfie the intent of these Statutes And so was the Law in reference to intailed Lands upon the Statute of 29 Eliz. cap. 6. which speaks of the full satisfaction of Arrearages in Case of the death of the Recusant Arrears where to be paid by the Heir in Tail where not And the Arrears were to have been paid by the Heir in Tail only in such Case where there was a Judgment obtained by the King against the Ancestor for his Recusancy but not where the Ancestor Tenant in Tail was convicted only upon Proclamation and default for in this last Case the Heir in Tail was not bound by the Statute of 33 H. 8. cap. 39. because 't is not a Debt by Judgment as that Statute requires Moore 523. C. 691. And thus the Opinion of the two Chief Justices Trin. 43 Eliz. is to be understood for they held That if intailed Lands had been seized for non-payment of the 20 l. per month and the Tenant in Tail had died the issue in Tail should not have had the Land out of the Queens hands before the Debt were satisfied but should have been charged with the said Debt Cro. Eliz. 846. At the end of which Case is added a Dubitatur But yet the Opinion there held stands good if it be intended only of a Conviction of the Ancestor by Judgment upon Trial or Confession and not of a Conviction upon Proclamation and default And be it further Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament Stat. Sect. 2. None shall go or send any other to a Seminary c. That all and every person and persons under the Kings Obedience which at any time after the end of this Session of Parliament shall pass or go or shall send or cause to be sent any Child or any other person under their or any of their Government into any the parts beyond the Seas out of the Kings Obedience to the intent to enter into or be resident in any Colledge Seminary or House of Iesuits Priests or any other Popish Order
invade or annoy him or his Countries or to discharge any of his Subjects of their Allegiance and Obedience to his Majesty or to give licence or leave to any of them to bear Arms raise Tumult or to offer any Violence or hurt to his Majesties Royal Person State or Government or to any of his Majesties Subjects within his Majesties Dominions Also I do swear from my Heart that notwithstanding any Declaration or sentence of Excommunication or deprivation made or granted or to be made or granted by the Pope or his Successors or by any Authority derived or pretended to be derived from him or his See against the said King his Heirs or Successors or any Absolution of the said Subjects from their Obedience I will bear Faith and true Allegiance to his Majesty his Heirs and Successors and him and them will defend to the uttermost of my power against all conspiracies and attempts whatsoever which shall be made against his or their Persons their Crown and Dignity by reason or colour of any such sentence or declaration or otherwise and will do my best indeavour to disclose and make known unto his Majesty his Heirs and Successors all Treasons and Traiterous Conspiracies which I shall know or hear of to be against him or any of them And I do further swear That I do from my Heart abhor detest and abjure as Impious and Heretical this damnable Doctrine and Position That Princes which be Excommunicated or Deprived by the Pope may be Deposed or Murthered by their Subjects or any other whatsoever And I do Believe and in Conscience am Resolved That neither the Pope nor any Person whatsoever hath Power to absolve me of this Oath or any part thereof which I acknowledge by good and full Authority to be lawfully Ministred unto me and do renounce all Pardons and Dispensations to the contrary And all these things I do plainly and sincerely acknowledge and swear according to these express words by me spoken and according to the plain and common sense and understanding of the same words without any Equivocation or mental Evasion or secret Reservation whatsoever And I do make this Recognition and Acknowledgment heartily willingly and truly upon the true Faith of a Christian So help me God Vnto which Oath so taken the said person shall subscribe his or her Name or Mark. If a man refuse to take any word of this Oath What is a refusal of the Oath 't is a refusal of the whole Bulstrode 1. 198. Lord Vaux his Case And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid Stat. Sect. 13. No Indictment or other proceedings against a Recusant shall be discharged or reversed for default of form That no Indictment or Indictments had or found or hereafter to be had or found against any person or persons for not repairing to some Church or Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer but absenting him or her self by the space of one month contrary to the Laws and Statutes in that behalf provided or for not receiving the said Sacrament contrary to this present Law nor any Proclamation Vtlawry or other procéeding thereupon shall at any time hereafter be avoided discharged or reversed by reason of any default in form or lack of form or other defect whatsoever other then by direct traverse to the point of not coming to Church or not receiving the said Sacrament whereof such person or persons hath beén or shall be Indicted but the same Indictment shall stand in force and be procéeded upon Any such default of form or other defect whatsoever notwithstanding Vtlawry A term for years sold upon an Outlawry restored A termor for years was outlawed upon an Indictment of Recusancy The Term was sold by the Lord Treasurer and Barons of the Exchequer and afterwards the Outlawry was reversed The Question was whether upon Reversal of the Outlawry the Recusant should have restitution of his Term again And Periam Justice doubted thereof and observed that the Book of 11 H. 4. 65. which saith that the party outlawed shall upon reversal of the Outlawry have restitution speaks only of Goods seized but not of a term sold before But Anderson Chief Justice and Walmesly Justice held That the Termor in this Case should have his Term again in whose soever hands the Land came and upon whatsoever Consideration and not the money for which the Term was sold For the Outlawry being reversed it is as if there were no Record of it And the Queens Interest was but conditional scil if the Outlawry were good Nor is this like the Case where a Sheriff upon a Fieri facias Fieri facias and venditioni exponas sells a Term For there if the Judgment be reversed the party shall have the money for which the Term was sold but not restitution of the Term it self as was resolved 26 Eliz. Dyer 363. And the reason is because the Sheriff did no more then he was commanded For he was commanded to sell and therefore the Sale shall be good to all intents But in the Case of an Outlawry it is otherwise and there is no such Command which difference between a Fieri facias and Capias utlagatum was agreed in Dr. Drury's Case Co. 8. 143. And in the principal Case here Judgment was given for the Termor according to the Opinion of Anderson and Walmesly Cro. Pasch 34 Eliz. C. B. 278. Eyre versus Woodfine Where the Patron outlawed shall be restored to his presentment A man is seized of an Advowson in gross the Church becomes void and then the Patron is outlawed upon an Indictment of Recusancy whereupon the King presents the Presentee is instituted and inducted and afterwards the Outlawry is reversed In this Case the Patron shall be restored to his presentment So if the Patron of an Advowson in gross hath Judgment in a Quare Impedit and is afterwards outlawed for Recusancy and the King presents and the presentee is instituted and inducted In this Case the Patron shall have a Scire facias to execute the Judgment and shall oust the Presentee of the King And the reason in both these Cases is because upon the Reversal of an Outlawry the party shall be restored to all things which are principal and here the presentment was the principal thing forfeited by the Outlawry and therefore upon reversal the Patron shall be restored to it Vide Moore 269 270. C. 421. Beverleigh versus Cornwall Savile 89. C. 166. the same Case And where not But if the King upon an Outlawry seize a Mannor to which an Advowson is appendant and the Church becomes void whereupon the King presents and the presentee is inducted There 't is otherwise and the Kings presentee shall not be removed upon reversal of the Outlawry For the presentment in that Case is but as an accessary that follows the principal which is the Mannor the profits of which Mannor the King was to have during the Outlawry and consequently the
proved that it was for her Joynture or if a man devise Lands by his last Will to his Wife generally and there is no mention in the Will that 't is for her Joynture for in this Case an Averment that it was so intended will not serve unless there be express words in the Will to that purpose These Estates so gained by the Wife as they do not bar her Dower out of the residue of her Husbands Estate but that she shall enjoy both the one and the other Co. 4. 4. so they are not within the meaning of this Act because not made for her Joynture And she shall not forfeit the profits of two parts of them although she may forfeit the profits of 2 parts of her Dower which she hath out of the residue of her Husbands Estate If Lands be conveyed to the Wife before marriage for part of her Joynture and other Lands are conveyed to her after Marriage in full satisfaction of her Jointure and she refuse those conveyed after Marriage in this Case she may retain those conveyed before Marriage and yet be endowed of the residue of her Husbands Estate For that the Lands first setled on her were not for her whole Joynture Co. 1. Inst 35. Co. 4. 3. Forfeiture of the profits of part of her Jointure And if she be a Popish Recusant Convict and her Husband none and she conform not within the year next before his death she shall forfeit the profits of two parts both of such Dower and of the Estate so conveyed to her before her Marriage And as the Wife shall have her Joynture and Dower both Where the Jointure is pursuant to the Statute in such Cases where the Joynture is not pursuant to the Statute of 27 H. 8. so in some Cases likewise where she hath a Joynture pursuant to that Statute As where she hath such a Joynture made to her by the Husband before Marriage and he afterwards endow her ad ostium Ecclesiae or if she hath a Joynture made by the Husband in his life time and after his death his Heir or Feoffee assign other Lands to her in Dower or the Heir plead to her in a Writ of Dower ne unque seisi que Dower c. or nient accouple in Loyal Matrimony or any other Plea save Joynture in bar of Dower and it be found against him In these Cases the Wife shall hold her Joynture and yet be endowed and if she be an Offender within this branch of the Act shall forfeit the profits of two parts of her Joynture and Dower both But if a Widow Dower not forfeited who is indowed of the Lands of her deceased Husband takes a second Husband who is no Popish Recusant Convicted by whom she hath a Jointure and she becomes a Popish Recusant Convict and the second Husband dies and the Wife is an Offender within this Act In this Case she shall not by force thereof forfeit the profits of two parts of such Dower and Jointure both but only of her Jointure For that her Dower is not out of the Lands of her said Husband that is of the Husband in whose life time she stood convicted and after such Conviction forbore to conform c. within the year next before his death And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid Stat. Sect. 12. A Popish Recusant shall be disabled as an Excommunicate person That every Popish Recusant which is or shall be convicted of Popish Recusancy shall stand and be reputed to all intents and purposes disabled as a person lawfully and duly Excommunicated and as if he or she had béen so denounced and excommunicated according to the Laws of this Realm until he or she so disabled shall conform him or her self and come to Church and hear Divine Service and receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper according to the Laws of this Realm and also take the Oath appointed and prescribed in one other Act made this present Session of Parliament Intituled An Act for the better discovering and repressing of Popish Recusants And that every person or persons sued or to be sued by such person so disabled shall and may plead the same in disabling of such Plaintiff as if he or she were Excommunicated by Sentence in the Ecclesiastical Court What Conviction disables him Convicted of Popish Recusancy The Conviction mentioned here and in the other branches of this Statute seems to be intended not only of a Conviction according to the Statute of 29 Eliz. 6. or 3 Jac. 4. Stat. 29 Eliz. 6. 3 Jac. 4. upon Proclamation and default of appearance but of a Judgment likewise upon an Indictment or popular Suit on the Statute of 23 Eliz. 1. or an Action of Debt c. by the King alone by force of the Statute of 35 Eliz. 1. 35 Eliz. 1. For Convicted in relation to these three last mentioned remedies is to be taken for adjudged or attainted Vide for this the Statute of 23 Eliz. 1. Sect. 5. And the Popish Recusant who is either convicted upon Proclamation and default of appearance or against whom Judgment is had upon an Indictment popular Suit or Action of Debt c. at the Kings Suit is hereby disabled as an Excommunicate person and liable to all other the penalties and incapacities inflicted by this Act on a Popish Recusant convicted To what intent as excommunicate Reputed to all intents and purposes disabled as a person c. Excommunicated And not reputed to all intents as an Excommunicate person as Wingate tit Crown numb 135. misrecites the Statute For as it seems by the words of the Statute the Popish Recusant convicted is not to be reputed as a person Excommunicate in any other respect or to any other intent but as to his disability only And yet the Opinion of the Court of Kings Bench Mich. 11 Jac. in the Case of Griffith and others seems to be to the contrary and that a Popish Recusant convicted may by force hereof be attached upon a Writ of Excommunicato capiendo Excommmnicato capiendo Bulstrode 2. 155. Tamen Quaere whether this Statute being a penal Law and speaking only of the point of disability shall be extended by Equity to other Cases or the Recusant be attached upon an Excommunicato capiendo unless he be first actually Excommunicated A Popish Recusant Convict is disabled as an Excommunicate person Witness to be a Witness in any Cause between party and party By Coke Chief Justice Bulstrode 2. 155. This disability but quousque May plead the same in disabling of such Plaintiff This disability in the Popish Recusant convicted is but quousque c. until he Conform c. and take the Oath of Allegiance And the Defendant must in this Case plead the Conviction at large and must as in a Plea of Excommengement demand if the Plaintiff shall be answered Hetley 18. which is the legal conclusion of a Plea in disability of
which the King hath already done or in respect of what the Recusant after his conviction hath omitted to do And therefore if a man be convicted of recusancy upon a popular Suit or an Action of Debt at the Kings Suit alone in which Cases the penalty of Twenty pounds per month is not appropriated to the King for the time to come and he pays the penalty recovered or if he be Convicted upon Indictment and after such Conviction duly pays the Twenty pounds per month into the Exchequer and the King makes no Election to take the two third parts of his Estate in lieu thereof such Recusant may by this Proviso in either of those Cases Sue or Prosecute for any of his Lands Tenements Leases Rents Annuities or Hereditaments whatsoever notwithstanding his Conviction For when the penalty recovered is satisfied or the forfeiture appropriated to the King is duly paid into the Exchequer his Lands c. are not to be seized by force of any Law for Recusancy unless the King make his Election to have the two parts And until that Election they cannot in the sense of this Proviso be said to be Lands to be seized or taken into the Kings hands for that the King cannot have the two parts and the Twenty pounds per month both But if the King make no such Election and the Twenty pounds per month be duly paid into the Exchequer the Recusant is to hold and enjoy all his Lands Tenements c. as if he had never been convicted And during that time there can be no distinction made between the two parts and the Recusant's third part so that in this Case the Recusant must either be enabled to Sue and Prosecute for all his Lands c. or none and to think the latter of these were to render this Proviso nugatory and vain But when once the King hath seized the two thirds for recusancy either by way of Election or for nonpayment of the penalty then the Recusant is enabled to Sue only for the other third part whether in the hands of the King or of a common person Stat. Sect. 14. And for that Popish Recusants are not usually Married nor their Children Christned nor themselves Buried according to the Law of the Church of England but the same are done superstitiously by Popish Persons in secret whereby the days of their Marriages Births and Burials cannot be certainly known Stat. Sect. 15. Marriages of Popish Recusants Be it further Enacted by Authority of this present Parliament That every man being or which shall be a Popish Recusant convicted and who shall be hereafter Married otherwise then in some open Church or Chappel and otherwise then according to the Orders of the Church of England by a Minister lawfully Authorized shall be utterly disabled and excluded to have any Estate of Fréehold into any the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments of his Wife as Tenant by the Courtesie of England And that every Woman being or which shall be a Popish Recusant convicted and who shall be hereafter Married in other form then as aforesaid shall be utterly excluded and disabled not only to claim any Dower of the Inheritance of her Husband whereof she may be endowable or any Iointure of the Lands and Hereditaments of her Husband or any of his Ancestors but also of her Widows Estate and Frank-bank in any Customary Lands whereof her Husband died seized and likewise be disabled and excluded to have or enjoy any part or portion of the goods of her said Husband by vertue of any custom of any County City or Place where the same shall lie or be And if any such man shall be Married with any Woman contrary to the intent and true meaning of this Act which Woman hath or shall have no Lands Tenements or Hereditaments whereof he may be intituled to be Tenant by the Curtesie Then such man so Marrying as aforesaid shall forfeit and lose One hundred pounds the one half thereof to be to the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors and the other moiety to such person or persons as shall Sue for the same by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information in any of the Kings Majesties Courts of Record wherein no Essoin Protection or Wager of Law shall be admitted or allowed Where the Husband is no offender Every man being or which shall be a Popish Recusant Convicted A Man who is no Popish Recusant Convicted marries a Woman who is a Popish Recusant Convicted in other form then is here appointed He shall not forfeit any thing or be disabled by this Act. By a Minister lawfully Authorized Minister lawfully Authorized In an Information upon this Statute for being married otherwise then is here appointed it is sufficient for the Defendant to say that he was married c. by a Minister lawfully Authorized without shewing in particular how or where or when but if a Traverse come of the other side then the Defendant is in his Rejoynder to shew the time and place Vide Bulstrode 2. 50. 52. Creswich against Rookesby Every Woman being or which shall be a Popish Recusant Convicted A Woman who is no Popish Recusant Convicted Where the Wife is no offender marries a Man who is a Popish Recusant Convicted in other form than is here appointed she shall not be disabled by this Branch of the Act For the forfeiture or disability extends only to the Popish Recusant Convicted and as in the Case before recited the Woman only shall be disabled so in this Case the Man only shall forfeit or be disabled Or any Ioynture of the Lands and Hereditaments of her Husband or any of his Ancestors Joynture A Feme who is a Popish Recusant Convicted and married otherwise then is appointed by this Act is not therefore disabled to have any sort of Joynture as Wingate tit Crowne n. 136. mistakes but only such Joynture as is of the Lands or Hereditaments of her Husband or some of his Ancestors and therefore if in consideration of some service done or for some other consideration and for the advancement of A. in marriage Lands are setled upon his intended Wife for her Joynture by some person besides A. who is not any of the Ancestors of A. such Joynture is not within this Act nor shall the Wife although a Popish Recusant Convicted and married otherwise c. be disabled by any strained construction of this Law to enjoy the Lands after her Husbands death For a penal Law shall be taken strictly and not by equity or intendment especially where the intent of the Lawmakers doth not appear to the contrary and the Case such as doth but rarely happen And 't is a good Rule in the construction of Statute Laws which the late Lord Chief Justice Vaughan hath laid down in his Argument of Bole and Hortons Case Mich. 25. Car. 2. viz. when the words of a Law extend not to an inconvenience rarely happening and do to those which often
as the person so sent or gone beyond the Seas shall conform him or her self and take the aforesaid Oath and receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper And after such Oath taken and conforming of himself and receiving the Sacrament of the Supper of the Lord he or they which have so received the profits of the said Lands Tenements Hereditaments Goods and Chattels or any of them shall make account of the profits so received and in reasonable time make payment thereof and restore the value of the said Goods to such person as shall so conform him or her self as aforesaid And of him that sendeth them And that all such persons as shall send the said Child or Children over Seas without Licence as aforesaid unless the said Child or Children be Merchants or their Apprentices or Factors Marriners or Soldiers shall forfeit one hundred pounds to be divided had and recovered in thrée equal parts whereof the one third part shall be to the King his Heirs and Successors the other third part to such as shall sue for the same and the other third part to the Poor of such Parish where such Offender doth inhabit or remain by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information in any the Kings Majesties Courts of Record wherein no Essoign Protection or Wager of Law shall be admitted or allowed Next of kin who The next of his or her kin It hath been a great Question formerly whether the Mother can be said to be of kin to the Child and it hath been held in the negative as well by the Common Lawyers as Civilians as appears by the Case in 5 E. 6. called the Duke of Suffolks Case and that of Browne and Shelton Bro. tit Administr ' 47. But the Law is now held to be otherwise viz. That the Mother shall be taken to be of kin to the Child and that in a nearer degree then is the Brother or Sister And that she shall be preferred in the Case of an Administration upon the Statute of 21 H. 8. cap. 5. and of Guardianship by the Statute of Marlebridge where a man dies seized of Lands holden in Socage Which later Opinion agreeth with that of Littleton in his tenures fo 1. where he saith That the Parent is nearer of blood to the Child then the Uncle vide Co. 1. Inst 88. And in Ratcliffes Case Co. 3.40 the Duke of Suffolks Case is denied to be Law So that if any Child be sent or go beyond the Seas contrary to this Act his Mother shall be preferred before his Brother or Sister and as next of kin may have and enjoy his Lands c. unless she be a Popish Recusant For next of kin And who not or next of blood shall not be accounted here by course of descent but as in the Case of a purchase where a Remainder is limited to the next of blood or kin And therefore if a man hath issue three Sons A. B. and C. and dieth A. and B. have issue each of them a Son and die The Son of B. goeth beyond the Seas contrary to this Act In this Case C. the youngest Uncle shall by force of this Act have and enjoy the Lands of the Offender until his Conformity and not the Son of A. the elder Uncle For that C. hath in him jus propinquitatis as being the Uncle and so nearer of kin then the Cousin german And yet the Son of A. is heir at Law jure representationis as being the Son of the eldest Brother Vide Co. 1. Inst 10. Palmer 304 305. Periman versus Pierce Shall have and enjoy the said Lands c. What is forfeited It was held by Montague and Hobart Chief Justices Pasch 15 Jac. in Tredway's Case That if a person goes beyond the Seas contrary to this Act yet the State of the Land is not forfeited nor setled in the next of kin but vests in the heir himself who is the Offender For the Statute saith not that he shall not take by descent but only that he shall take no benefit by descent and that therefore this Statute differs from those of 5 R. 2. of consenting to Ravishment Stat. 5 R. 2. 11 H. 7. Sale by the heir and 11 H. 7. of discontinuances by Women And Hobart said That if the Heir beyond Sea bargain and sell the Land descended to him he shall prevent the next of kin if he hath not entred And if he hath entred the Land shall be taken from him Quaere of this for Tanfeild Chief Baron seemed to be of a contrary Opinion in the main point and held that the State of the Land is setled by this Act in the next of kin Ley 59. Note in the Report of this Case of Tredway it s said to be the meaning of this Act that the profits of the Land should be received by the next of kin during the Offenders Non-conformity But these words have and enjoy seem to imply some what more and that the next of kin shall have the Land it self All such persons as shall send the said Child or Children c. Here Wingate tit Crown numb 139. mistakes the person who shall forfeit the hundred pounds Forfeiture of 100 l. applying it to the Child who goes beyond Sea and not to the person who sends him Stat. Sect. 19. The forfeiture of those already gone beyond the Seas And for that many Subjects of this Realm being neither Merchants nor their Factors nor Apprentices Soldiers nor Marriners are of late gone beyond the Seas without Licence and are not as yet returned Be it further Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament That if any of the said persons so gone beyond the Seas without Licence which are not yet returned shall not within six months next after their return into this Realm then being of the age of Eighteén years or more take the Oath above specified before some Iustice of Peace of the County Liberty or Limit where such person shall inhabit or remain that then every such Offender shall take no benefit by any gift conveyance descent devise or otherwise of or to any Lands Tenements Hereditaments Goods or Chattels until he or they being of the said age of Eightéen years or above take the said Oath and that likewise in the mean time the next of kin to the person so offending which shall be no Popish Recusant shall have and enjoy the said Lands Tenements Hereditaments Goods and Chattels so given conveyed descended or devised until such time as the person so offending shall conform himself and take the aforesaid Oath and receive the said Sacrament of the Lords Supper And after such conforming taking of the said Oath and receiving of the said Sacrament he or they that shall have so received the profits of the said Lands Tenements Hereditaments Goods and Chattels shall make account of the profits so received and in reasonable time make payment thereof and of the value of such Goods and Chattels to
and really in him who hath the right of nomination as is held in 14 H. 4. 11. Chancellor and Schollers of the Vniversity Chancellor and Schollers a good description Although the University be incorporated by the name of Chancellor Masters and Schollers yet the description here made of them by the name of Chancellor and Schollers is well enough and sufficiently denotes the persons intended And the University shall have the presentation c. as if the true name of the Incorporation had been expressed For Acts of Parliament as well as Wills are to be taken according to the intent of the Makers and not according to the strict Letter Co. 10. 57. Shall have the presentation c. What is given the University It hath been made a Question what is given the University by these words whether only a bare power or liberty to present or a setled estate and interest in the Partronage or Advowson See the before cited Case of Standen versus University d'Oxon Jones 22 23 25 26. where two Justices Hutton and Jones were divided in opinion upon this point For Hutton held that that which is given to the University by this Act is a setled estate and interest and compared it to the interest or estate of the Lord who was to hold the Land until he was satisfied the value of the marriage of the Heir and to that of the Conusee by the Statute of Acton Burnell and to an estate given to a Man until a hundred pounds be paid In all which Cases the party hath a setled estate and interest in the Land But Jones held the contrary and that the University hath by this Act only a power or liberty to Present when the Church becomes void and compared it to the power given to the Bishop to Present by lapse after the six months and to that given by the Statute of Proviso's 25 E. 3. where the Pope provides Stat. 25 E. 3. 31 Eliz. 6 and to that given the King by the Statute of 31 Eliz. of Simony In which Cases no Estate or Interest is transferred but only a power or liberty granted to Present For this Act doth not remove the Patronage from the Popish Recusant The Recusant is still Patron but that continues still in him and he is Patron notwithstanding his Conviction and as Patron shall confirm a Lease made by the Incumbent as he might have done before his Conviction which proves that the Interest of the Patronage is not devested out of him nor consequently setled in the University Private clause Note Although this be a general Statute and that part of it which disables the Recusant to Present c. or to grant any Avoidance be general of which the Judges ought to take notice yet this part of it which gives the Presentation c. to the Universities is special and private for that it concerns only particular persons and must be pleaded or specially found or otherwise the Judges cannot take notice of it Hobart 227. Anne Needler versus the Bishop of Winchester Co. 10. 57. See the Rules touching publick and private Acts of Parliament and touching special or private Clauses in general Acts of Parliament 13 E. 4. 8. Co. 4. 76 77. Hollands Case During such time as the Patron thereof shall be and remain a Recusant Convict Conviction when requisite If the University bring a Quare Impedit upon this Statute they must averr that the Popish Recusant Convict was and remained such at the time when the Church became void For without that they do not enable themselves to Present But they need not averr that he remains a Popish Recusant Convict at the time of the bringing of the Quare Impedit for when the Presentment hac vice is once vested in the University although the Recusant conform or die yet the University shall Present Co. 10.57 58. University hath a limited power These words are words of restraint and the Statute gives only a limited power to the University scil so long as the Recusant shall be Patron or the Patron shall be a Recusant So that if before the Church becomes void the Recusancy be removed from the Patron by his Conformity or the Patronage be removed from the Recusant although he continues a Recusant the University have lost their power to Present Jones 19. And therefore if the Patron grant the Advowson in Fee or in Tail Grants which bar the University or for life or years these Cases are out of the Statute And although after the Grant he becomes a Popish Recusant Convict and then the Church becomes void yet the University shall not Present And it seems that although the Patron make such Grant of the Advowson after his Conviction and before the Church is void yet this shall bar the University For the Patronage was before the Avoidance removed from the Recusant Jones 19. Co. 10. 56. contrary to the Opinion of Hutton who held that if a man make a Lease for years of an Advowson yet if afterwards he becomes a Popish Recusant Convict the University shall have the Presentation as a future interest given to them by this Act notwithstanding such Lease Jones 26. And the reason why by such Grants the University shall be barred is for that the disability here inflicted on the Recusant is only a disability to Present or to grant the next Avoidance which extends not to any of the Grants beforementioned nor severs the Patronage from the Patron as those other Grants do And the intent of the Statute is to prevent a Presentation by the Recusant or by him to whom he should grant the next Avoidance Intent of the Statute who it was presumed would Present such an one as the Recusant should appoint But now when he grants the Advowson it self away that mischief is prevented and the Statute intended not in that Case to give away the Presentation from the Grantee to the University Jones 19 20. And yet if the Recusants Grant of the Advowson in Fee Covinous Grant or in Tail or for life or years were by Covin or in Trust on purpose to avoid this Statute and be averred and found so to be such Grant shall not bar the University Jones 20. Co. 10. 56. Vide Godbolt 216. C. 309. But then the Averment Averment in such Case must not be of Covin or Fraud to any other intent only but it must be averred to be to the particular intent to avoid this Statute and defeat the University of the Presentment and so it must be found by the Jury Verdict For if it be averred or the Jury find that the Recusant granted away the Advowson for any other Covinous purpose Intent as to deceive Creditors or the like and not to avoid this Act this will not help the University nor shall they take advantage thereof so as to devest or impeach the Interest or Estate of the Grantee in the Advowson And this
meét to be Executors or Administrators to any person or persons whatsoever nor to have the Education of their own Children much less of the Children of any other of the Kings Subjects nor to have the marriage of them Be it therefore Enacted by the Authority aforesaid A Recusant shall not be Executor or Administrator That such Recusants convicted or which shall be convicted at the time of the death of any Testator or at the time of the granting of any Administration shall be disabled to be Executor or Administrator by force of any Testament hereafter to be made or Letters of Administration hereafter to be granted Or Guardian nor shall have the custody of any Child as Guardian in Chivalry Guardian in Socage or Guardian in nurture of any Lands Tenements or Hereditaments being Fréehold or Copyhold but shall be adjudged disabled to have any such Wardship or Custody of any such Child or of their Lands Tenements or Hereditaments being Fréehold or Copyhold as aforesaid Who shall have the Wardship And that for the better Education and Preservation of the said Children and of their Estates the next of the kin to such Child or Children to whom the said Lands Tenements or Hereditaments of such Child or Children cannot lawfully descend who shall usually resort to some Church or Chappel and there hear Divine Service and receive the holy Sacrament of the Lords Supper thrice in the year next before according to the Laws of this Realm shall have the Custody and Education of the same Child and of his said Lands and Tenements being holden in Knights Service until the full age of the said Ward of one and twenty years And of his said Lands Tenements and Hereditaments being holden in Socage as a Guardian in Socage And of the said Lands Tenements and Hereditaments holden by Copy of Court Roll of any Mannor so long as the Custom of the said Mannor shall permit and allow the same and in every of the said Cases shall yield an Accompt of the profits thereof to the said Ward as the Case shall require And that if at any time hereafter any of the Wards of the Kings Majesty or of any other shall be granted or sold to any Popish Recusant Convict such Grant or Sale shall be utterly void and of none effect Convicted at the time of the death of any Testator or at the time of the granting of any Administration Granting of Administration These words are to be construed reddendo singula singulis viz. That the Recusant shall be disabled to be Executor if he be convicted at the time of the death of the Testator or to be Administrator if he be Convicted at the time of the granting of Letters of Administration For so these words at the time of the granting of any Administration are here to be understood And therefore if a man makes his Will and therein appoints a Recusant Convict to be his Executor Executor where not disabled and before the Testators death the Conviction is removed by Reversal of the Judgment or avoided or discharged for some defect in the Indictment Proclamation or other proceedings and then the Testator dies In such Case the Recusant is not by this Act disabled to be Executor For although the naming of an Executor is in Law a granting of Administration And if a man by his last Will grants the Administration of his Goods and Chattels to J. S. without more saying thereby J. S. is made his Executor Dyer 290. So that the naming of an Executor and the granting of Administration seem to be the same thing yet this is not a granting of Administration within the meaning of this Act Administration here relating only to an Administrator and not to an Executor besides the naming of an Executor amounts not to a compleat grant of Administration until the Testators death For then and not before the Will becomes in force And if the party stands not then convicted he is not disabled Much less shall he be disabled to be Executor who is not convicted at the time of the Testators death although he be convicted at the time of the Probate of the Will For if these words granting of Administration should relate to an Executor as well as to an Administrator which in truth they do not yet the power given to the Executor by the Ordinary or Ecclesiastical Judge upon the probate of the Will cannot be called a granting but only a committing of Administration Committing of Administration What the Ordinary grants to an Executor according to the Will of the deceased And in such Case all that the Ordinary or Ecclesiastical Judge can grant are Letters testifying what the Testator hath already given to the Executor and a Power or Authority to execute the Will As Guardian in Chivalry Although the Recusant seized in Chivalry and Convicted could not have been Guardian yet if he had granted the Seigniory Seigniory granted over to one who was no Recusant the Grantee should have been Guardian notwithstanding this Act for the mischief here intended to be prevented was removed when the Seigniory was granted to another who was no Recusant By Jones Justice C. B. Hill 20. Jac. Jones 19. So if the King had seized Seized by the King the Recusants Seigniory as part of his two parts the King should have had the Wardship and not the next of kin for the same reason Jones 21. Stat. Sect. 22. Popish Books And be it further Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament That no person or persons shall bring from beyond the Seas nor shall Print sell or buy any Popish Primmers Ladies Psalters Manuels Rosaries Popish Catechisms Missals Breviaries Portalls Legends and Lives of Saints containing superstitious matter Printed or Written in any Language whatsoever nor any other superstitious Books Printed or Written in the English Tongue upon pain of forfeiture of Forty shillings for every such Book one third part thereof to be to the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors one other third part to him that will sue for the same and the other third part to the Poor of the Parish where such Book or Books shall be found to be recovered by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information in any of the Kings Majesties Courts of Record wherein no Essoin Protection or Wager of Law shall be admitted or allowed and the said Books to be burned Stat. Sect. 23. Popish Reliques and Books And that it shall be lawfull for any two Iustices of Peace within the Limits of their Iurisdiction or Authority and to all Mayors Bailiffs and Chief Officers of Cities and Towns Corporate in their Liberties from time to time to search the Houses and Lodgings of every Popish Recusant Convict or of every person whose Wife is or shall be a Popish Recusant Convict for Popish Books and Reliques of Popery And that if any Altar Pix Beads Pictures or such like Popish Reliques or any Popish Book