the higher nature the party though not the Kings tenant lost his personal estate to the King for ever his free holds also for a yeere and a day after which they returned to the Lord of the soile by way of escheat It seemeth also that the losse not onely of chattels and goods but also of lands c. extended to Outlaries I conceive in case of Felony and the Kings pardon in such case could not bind the Lords right of escheate although it might discharge the goods and the yeere and the day whereunto the King was entituled which case alone sufficiently declareth what power Kings had in the estates of their subjects Manslaughter 5. Manslaughter made not bailable This was law in Henry the seconds time although it crossed the Norman Law Glanvil l. 14. cap. 1 3. and questionlesse it was upon good ground for the times now were not as those in the Conquerours times when shedding of blood was accounted valour and in most cases in order to the publique service And now it seems it was a growing evill and that cried so loud as though in case of Treason baile might be allowed yet not in this case ubi ad terrorem aliter statutum est saith the authour Robbers 6. Robbery shall be committed to the Sheriffe or in his absence to the next Castelane who shall deliver him to the Sheriffe And the Justices shall doe right to them and unto trespassers upon Land Ll. Gul. 4. Spicil 174. By the Conquerours law these offenders were bailable and I conceive this was no repeale thereof and the rather because Glanvile alloweth of pledges in all cases except Manslaughter yea in those crimes that did wound Majesty it selfe Glanvil lib. 14. cap. 1. although they concerne the destruction of the Kings person or sedition in the Kingdome or Army thereof The Justices herein mentioned were intended to be the Justices itinerant and the trespasses upon Land are meant such as are contra pacem Domini Regis as riotous and forcible entries for some trespasses were against the peace of the Sheriffe as formerly hath been observed Fauxonry 7. Fauxonry Glanvil lib. 14 cap. 7. is of severall degrees or kinds some against the King others against other men and of those against the King some are punished as wounds of Majesty as falsifying the Kings charter and whether falsifying of money were in that condition or not I leave or falsifying of measures yet more inferiour I cannot determine but its cleare by Glanvile that falsifying of the deed of a private person was of smaller consideration and at the utmost deserved but losse of member Inheritances may not be aliened 8. Glanvil lib. 7. cap. 1. Ibid. c. 5. Inheritances were in those times of lands or goods for it was the custome then that the personall estate the debts deducted was divisible into three parts one whereof belonged in right to the wife as her reasonable part the other to the heire and third to the testator to make his will of them and of the other two parts he could not dispose by will Concerning Lands it was regularly true that no man could alien his whole inheritance to the disherisin of his heire either by act in his life time or any part thereof by his last will without the concurrance of the heire But of purchased lands he may give part by act executed in his life time though he have no Lands by inheritance and if he hath no issue then he may alien all And where a man hath Lands by inheritance and also by purchase he may alien all his purchased lands as he pleaseth If the lands be holden in Gavel kinde no more of the inheritance can be conveyed to any of the children then their proportionable parts will amount unto This law of inheritance was divers according to the tenure for the lands in Knight-service alwaies discended to the heire but such as were holden in soccage passed according to the custome either to the eldest or to the youngest or to all equally And thus stood the generall state of inheritance from the Normans times hitherto Ll. Hen 1. c. 88. seeming somewhat too strait for the free men that by law of property might challenge a power to doe with their own as they pleased But the Normans saw a double prejudice herein the first was the danger of ruine of many of their families who now ingrafted into the English stocke and yet not fully one might expect a late checke to their preferments from the Saxon parents after a long and faire semblance made of their good will The second prejudice was the decay of their Militia which was maintained by riches more then by multitude of men partly because that rich men are most fearfull of offending and therefore ordinarily are most serviceable both with their bodies and estates against publique dangers and partly because by their friends and allies they bring more ayd unto the publique by ingaging them in the common cause that otherwise might prove unsensible of the condition of their Country The heire of a free man shall by descent be in such seism as 9. his ancester had at the time of his death Vide Glanv l. 7. c 9. doing service and paying releif and shall have his chattailes If the heire be under age the Lord shall have the Wardship for the due time and the wife her Dower and part of the goods If the Lord withhold seisin the Kings Justice shall trie the matter by twelve men The first of these branches is declaratory of a ground of common law but being applied to the last is an introduction of a new law of triall of the heires right by Assize of Mortdancester where formerly no remedy was left to the heire but a Writ of right If these three branches be particularly observed they speake of three sorts of heires of tenants by Knight-service viz. such as are majors or of full age and such as are minors or under age and such as are of a doubtfull age Those that are of full age at the death of their ancestors may possesse the lands descended and the Lord may not disseise him thereof but may be resisted by the heire in the maintenance of his possession so as he be ready to pay reliefe and doe service that is due and if the Lord expell him he shall have remedy by Assize Those heires that are minors shall be under the Lords guardianship till they come to one and twenty yeeres Tbe heires of such as hold by soccage are said to be at full age at fifteene yeeres because at that age they were thought able to doe that service but the sonnes of Burgesses are then said to be of full age when they have ability to mannage their fathers calling such as telling of money measuring of cloath and the like yet doth not Glanvile or any other say that these were their full age to all purposes albeit that some Burroughs at
Charter and other Statutes during the reignes of these Kings SHattered asunder by broiles of Civill wars the free men having laid aside that regard of the ancient mutuall covenant and bond of Decenners are now become weake and almost inthralled to the lust of Kings Lords Pope and English Clergy and therefore it s no wonder if taxes and tributes were many and new although most of them deserved not to march under any banner but the colours of oppression nor did any thing save them from the worst tenure of all but the severall interests of those superiour powers which oftentimes did justle with one another and thereby gave the Commons liberty to take breath so as though for the present they lost ground and hunted upon a coole sent yet they still retained the prey within their view Sometimes they were cast farre behind other times they recovered themselves a truce is cried and laws are made to moderate all and determine the bounds of every one and thus comes the grand Charter into the Publique Theater The Historian saith it was the same with that of King Johns framing and yet by comparing them together we finde them disagreeing both in words and sence and therefore shall sum the same up as shortly as I can observing the difference of the two Charters as I passe along The first Chapter concerned the Church of which sufficient hath been spoken Mag. carta The Free men shall enjoy these liberties to them and their heires for ever cap. 2. The heire in Knightservice shall pay the ancient reliefe cap. 3. That reliefes were setled by the Saxons hath been already shewed and also that they were continued and confirmed by Henry the first onely in those times they were payed in Horses Armes c. but in after times all was turned into money which was more beneficiall for all cap. 4. Vide Stat. de Wardis 28 E. 1 Lords shall have their Wards bodies and Lands after homage received untill the full age though the Ward be formerly Knighted Glanvil lib 6. cap. 1. 4. The Law of Wardship may seem more anciently seated in this Kingdome then the Normans times for if the Statutes of Scotland beare any credit that Law was in Scotland before those times The Lords were not to have the Wardship before they were possessed of the tenure because it was theirs as a fruit of the tenure according to the Saxon law concerning distresse that it could not be in the power of the Lord to distraine till he was possessed of the service Stat. Marlbr cap. 6 7. And if by fraudulent conveyance the heire did hold the Lord out of possession a Writ of Ward did lie against him and if he did not appeare the Lord might seise the Lands unlesse in case of Wardship per cause de guard Stat. Marlbr cap. 16. prerog Reg. cap. 3. And in case the Lord would hold the Wardship longer then the full age of the heire an Assize did lie against the Lord for the heire could not enter without livery But if the heire were of full age at the time of the ancestors death the Lord could not enter the Lands and yet he should have a reliefe and the primer seisin And if the heire entered the Lands before homage done he gained no free hold Prerog Reg. cap. 13. though he were Knighted before as this Law provideth for it may seem that these times of civill warre brought forth a tricke of Knighting betimes as an honourable encouragement for young sparks to enter the field before they were compleat men of discretion to know whether the cause of warre was good or evill and yet reason might induce a conceit that he that was thought meet to doe Knight service in his own person might expect the maintenance fit for the ability of the person and honour of the service Grantees or their assignes or Committees of Wardships shall preserve the Land c. from waste cap. 5. and the tenants from extortion They shall yeeld up the same stocked if they receive them stocked cap. 6. The first of these is the law of common reason for its contrary to guardianship to destroy that which by their office they ought to preserve As touching the words of the Law the Grantees are omitted in the Charter of King John and also their assignees albeit that doubtlesse they were within the intent and meaning of the Law The matter declares plainly not onely the oppession of Lords upon their Wards but also the corruption even of the law it selfe that at the first aimed at the good of the publique and honour of Knightservice but now was degenerated into the base desire of profit by making market of the Wards estates and marriages that brought in strip and wast of Estates and niggardly neglect of the education and training up of the persons of the Wards and an imbasing of the generation of mankind and spoile of times Nor did these times ever espie or provide against the worst of these but onely endeavoured to save the estate by punishing the wasters in dammages by this law and by forfaiture of the Wardship by a Law made in the time of Edward the first Stat. Gloc. cap. 5. and this as well for waste done during the time of the custody as in the life time of his ancestors by another law in Edward the firsts time Stat. de vasto 20 E. 1. And because the Escheators and their under Officers used to serve themselves out of the estates of minors before they certified to the King his right and those were not within the Law of Magna Carta or at least not so reputed Artic. sup cart cap. 18. It was therefore afterwards provided that these also should render dammages in a Writ of wast to be brought against them The marriage of Wards shall be without disparagement cap. 7. It was an ancient law amongst the Germans and the Saxons brought it hither Tacitus mor. Germ. and as a Law setled it that marriage must be amongst equals but the Danes and Normans sleighted it and yet it continued and was revived Now as the Lord had the tuition of the Ward instead of the ancester so had he the care of the marriage in such manner as the ancester might have had if he had lived For in case the Ward were stolne and married the delinquent suffered fine and imprisonment Or if the ward married without the Lords consent he shall have the double value S at Merton cap. 6. and hold the land over till satisfaction But in case the Lord marrieth the Ward within fourteene yeeres of age to its disparagement cap. 7. he shall lose his Wardship thereby And if the Ward refuseth to accept of a marriage tendred by the Lord before her age of 16 yeeres West 1. c. 22. the Lord shall hold the Lands till he have received the full valew and in case where one tenant holdeth of
sold delayed or denied It s a comprehensive law and made up of many Saxon laws or rather an inforcement of all laws and a remedy against oppression past present and to come and concerneth first the person then his livelihood as touching the person his life and his liberty his life shall be under the protection of the law and his liberty likewise so as he shall be shut into no place by imprisonment nor out of any place by banishment but shall have liberty of ingresse and egresse His estate both reall and personall shall also be under the protection of the Law and the law also shall be free neither denied nor delayed I thinke it needlesse to shew how this was no new law but a confirmation of the old and reparation added thereto being much impaired by stormy times for the summe of all the foregoing discourse tendeth thereto cap. 32. Merchants shall have free and safe passage and trade without unjust taxes as by ancient custome they ought In time of warre such as are of the enemies Countries shall be secured till it appeare how the English Merchants are used in their Countries That this was an ancient law the words thereof shew besides what may be observed out of the Laws of Aetheldred and other Saxon laws So as it appeareth that not onely the English free men and natives had their liberties asserted by the law but also forrainers if Merchants had the like liberties for their persons and goods concerning trade and maintenance of the same and were hereby enabled to enjoy their own under the protection of the law as the free men had And unto this law the charter of King John added this ensuing It shall be lawfull for every free man to passe freely to and from this Kingdome saving fealty to the King unlesse in time of warre and then also for a short space as may be for the common good excepting prisoners outlaws and those Countrey-men that are in enmity and Merchants who shall be dealt with as aforesaid And it seemeth that this law of free passage out of the Kingdome was not anciently fundamentall but onely grounded upon reason of State although the free men have liberty of free passage within the Kingdome according to that originall law sit pax publica per communes vias and for that cause as I suppose it was wholly omitted in the Charter of Henry the third as was also another law concerning the Jewes which because it left an influence behind it after the Jewes were extinct in this Nation and which continueth even unto this day I shall incert it in this short summe After death of the Jewes debtor no usury shall be payd during the minority of the heire though the debt shall come into the Kings hand And the debt shall be payd saving to the wife her dower and maintenance for the children according to the quantity of the debtors Land and saving the Lords service and in like manner of debts to others The whole doctrine of usury fell under the title of Jewes for it seemeth it was their trade and their proper trade hitherto Concil Brit. 299. It was first that I met with forbidden at a Legatine Councell nigh 300 yeeres before the Normans times but by the Confessors law it was made penall to Christians to the forfeiture of estate and banishing and therefore the Jewes and all their substance were holden to be in nature of the Kings villeines as touching their estate Ibid. 623. Glanvil lib. 7. cap. 16. for they could get nothing but was at his mercy and Kings did suffer them to continue this trade for their own benefit yet they did regulate it as touching infants as by this law of King John and the Statute at Merton doth appeare M. Paris An. 1229. Merton cap. 5. Stat. de Judais An 18 E. 1. but Henry the third did not put it into his Charter as I thinke because it was no liberty of the subjects but rather a prejudice thereto and therefore Edward the first wholly tooke it away by a Statute made in his time and thereby abolished the Jewes Tenants Lands holden of Lands escheated to the King shall hold by the same services as formerly cap. 33. cap. 34. In all alienations of Lands sufficient shall be left for the Lords distresse Prerog Reg. cap. 7. Submitting to the judgement of the learned I conceive that as well in the Saxon times as untill this law any tenant might alien onely part of his lands and reserve the services to the alienor because he could not reserve service upon such alienation unto the Lord paramount other then was formerly due to him without the Lords consent and for the same reason could they not alien the whole tenancy to binde the Lord without his expresse licence saving the opinion in the booke of Assizes 20 ass pl. 17. because no tenant could be inforced upon any Lord least he might be his enemy Neverthelesse it seemeth that de facto tenants did usually alien their whole tenancy and although they could not thereby barre the Lords right yet because the Lord could not in such case have the distresse of his own tenant this law saved so much from alienation as might serve for security of the Lords distresse But tenants were not thus satisfied the Lords would not part with their tenants although the tenants necessity was never so urgent upon them to sell their Lands and therefore at length they prevailed by the Statute of Quia emptores to have power to sell all 18 Edw. 1. Westm 3. ca. 1. saving to the Lords their services formerly due and thus the Lords were necessitated to grant licences of alienation to such as the tenants could provide to buy their lands Nor was this so prejudiciall to the Lords in those daies when the publique quiet was setled as it would have been in former times of warre when as the Lords right was maintained more by might and the ayd of his tenants then by law which then was of little power cap. 35. The 35 Chapter I have formerly mentioned in the Chapter concerning the Clergy cap. 36. No man shall be appealed by a woman for the death of any but her own husband The right of appeale is grounded upon the greatest interest Now because the wives interest seemeth wholy to be swallowed up in her husband therefore she shall have an appeale of the death of him onely and such also was the Law in Glanvils time How far this point of interest shall extend to the degrees of consanguinity the Norman Law formerly hath shewen And against whom appeales did lie the Statute at Westminster tels us viz. not onely against the principall West 1. cap. 14 but also against accessories yet not against them till the principall be attainted And because it was ordinary for men of nought to appeale others in a malicious way Westm 2. ca. 13 it was by another law established
of these persons the one being perpetuall the other temporary therefore is there also by these laws a difference in the disposall of their estates for the tutor had a right in the disposing of the one and but a bare authority or power in providing for the other Secondly the person of the tutor is to be considered Anciently it was the next kindred grounded as I conceive upon the naturall affection going along with the blood and this so continued in custome untill these times for though the Miror of Justices saith that Henry the first brought in that course of giving the custody of these disabled persons to the King as hath been formerly observed yet Bracton that wrote long after the time of Henry the first speaking of these kind of persons saith Bract. lib. 5. cap. 20. Talibus de necessitate dandus est tutor vel curator not so much as mentioning the King in the case And in another place speaking of such as are alieni juris saith that some are under the custody of their Lords and others under their parents and friends Lib. 1. cap. 10 But let the time of the entrance of this law be never so uncertaine it s now a declared law that the King in such cases is the common curator or tutor of all such persons as he is a chiefe Justice rendring to every one his right The King shall have the wrecks of the Sea Prerog Reg. cap. 11. West 1. cap. 4. What shall be called a wreck the Statute at Westm 1. declareth viz. where the ship so perisheth that nothing therein escapeth alive and these are rather in their originall committed to the King as a curator then given him as a proprietor although that custome hath since setled a kind of right which may perhaps be accounted rather a title by estoppell For the fundamentall ground is that the right owner cannot be manifested and therefore the King shall hold it and if the right owner can be manifested the King shall hold it till the owner doth appeare Marlb cap. 17. The heire in Socage tenure shall have an action of waste and an accompt against his guardian for the profits of his lands and mariage The heire in Socage being under age shall also be under custody of such guardian of the next kindred Bracton lib. 2. cap. 37. who cannot challenge right of inheritance in such lands so holden as if the Lands descended from the father side the mother or next of the kindred of the mothers side shall have the custody and so if the Lands descend from the mother the father or next kindred of the fathers side shall have the custody And this custody bringeth with it an authority or power onely and no right as in case of the heire in Knightservice and therefore cannot be granted over as the wardship in Knightservice might but the guardian in Socage remaineth accomptant to the heire for all profits both of land and marriage The full age of tenant in Socage is such age wherein he is able to doe that service which is 14 yeeres for at such age he may b able by common repute to ayd in tillage of the ground which is his proper service But the sonne of a Burgesse hath no set time of full age but at such time as he can tell money and measure cloath and such worke as concerne that calling Merton cap. 1. Widdows deforced of their Dower of Quarentine shall by action recover damages till they recover their Dower cap. 2. They shall also have power to divise their crop arising from her Dower Bract. lib. 2. cap. 40. It was used that the heire should have the crop with the Land but this Statute altered that former usage and yet saved the Lords liberty to distraine if any services were due Writs de consimili casu granted in cases that fall under the same Law and need the same remedy West 2. cap. 24. and such Writs shall be made by agreement of the Clerks in the Chancery and advice of such as are skilfull in the Law It was none of the meanest liberties of the freemen of England that no Writs did issue forth against them but such as were anciently in use and agreed upon in Parliament And it was no lesse a grievance and just cause of complaint that Kings used to send Writs of new impression to execute the dictates of their own wils and not of the Laws of the Kingdome M. Paris addit Artic. 44. as the complaints of the Clergy in the times of Henry the third doth witnesse Neverthelesse because many mens cases befell not directly within the Letter of any Law for remedy and yet were very burdensome for want of remedy it s provided by this Law that in such emergent cases that doe befall within the inconvenience shall likewise be comprehended within the remedy of that law Aide to make the sonne of the Lord a Knight West 1. c. 36. and to marry his eldest daughter shall be assessed after the rate of twenty shillings for a Knights fee and twenty shillings for twenty pounds in yeerely value of Soccage tenure The uncertainties of ayds are by this Law reduced and setled as touching the summe and thereby delivered the people from much oppression which they suffered formerly Nor was onely the particular summe hereby but also the age of the sonne when he was to be made a Knight viz. at the age of fifteen yeeres too soon for him to performe Knightservice but not too soone for the Lord to get his money And the daughter likewise was allowed to be fit for marriage at seven yeeres of age or at least to give her consent thereto albeit that in truth she was neither fit for the one or other and therefore it must be the Lords gaine that made the Law and it was not amisse to have the ayd beforehand though the marriage succeeded not for many yeeres after and if the Lord died in the interim the executors having assets paied it or otherwise his heire CHAP. LXVIII Of Courts and their proceedings BEsides the Courts of Justices itinerant which were ancient as hath been said other Courts have been raised of latter birth albeit even they also have been of ancient constitution and divers of them itinerant also and some of them setled in one place The worke of the Justices itinerant was universall comprehending both matters of the Crown and Common-pleas That of oyer and terminer is onely of Crown pleas originally commenced and inquired of by themselves and granted forth upon emergent crimes of important consequence that require speedy regard and reformation Justices of Gaol-delivery have a more large worke that is to deliver the Gaols of all criminall offenders formerly indicted or before themselves Justices of Assize and Nisi prius are to have cognisance of Common pleas onely and for the most part are but fo inquiry All which saving the Justices itinerant in ancient use were instituted
estate if the sale be not effectuall and in case the vendor have no warrant for such goods by him sold No living Cattell shall be sold but onely in Cities Ll. Gulielm cap. 60. and before three witnesses nor shall any thing forbidden be sold without warranty No faires or markets shall be holden but onely in Cities Ibid. c. 61. Burroughs walled Towns and Castles These Lawes concerning sales and markets were ancient Saxon lawes and tend all to the avoyding of cheating men of their Cattell by surreptitious sale of them made by such as had no right Goods found shall be published by the finder to the neighbourhood Ll. Gulielm cap. 7. and if any makes claime and proofe of them to be his he shall have them giving security to bring them into the Court in case any other shall within a yeere and a day make his claim thereto The children of persons intestate shall equally divide the heritage Ll. Gulielm cap. 36. This is in terminis the Saxon law and therefore concerning it I shall referre to the same formerly recited onely I shall adde hereto the law of Henry the first Ll. Hen. I which may serve as an explanation of the former Any free man may devise his chattels by will and if he die intestate his wife children parents or next kinne shall divide the same for his soules good The first branch whereof was ancient and doubtlesse in continuall use but the iniquity of the Norman rude times was such that the Lords under surmise of arreares or reliefe would seise all the personall estate after the tenants death and so the right of last wils was swallowed up but this restoreth the power of last wils into its place and in case the party died intestate preserveth a kind of nature of descent although they be more personall Nor doth that last clause of the soules good disannull the same although the words may seem to carry away the benefit to some other hand For the whole matter is left to the discretion of such as are next to the intestate CHAP. LII Of Laws that concerne common interest of Lands THe Laws that concerne Lands and peculiarly belonging to the Normans are such as concerne principally the tenure of Lands which if duly considered although savoured somewhat of the King yet little of the Conquerour for generally it must be granted that tenures long before and after this time were as the services ordered according to the will of the giver in which as the King had the greatest share and he the most publique person of all so were his donations ordered chiefly to advance the publique service and in this regard the tenure by Knight service might more principally challenge the Kings regard then the regard of all the great men besides But this was not the soare yea rather it was the beauty and strength of the Kingdome and for which the King deserved an honorable name above most of his progenitors who had not so much land to dispose of as he had and therefore could not advance that service in any proportion equall unto him The sore that caused so many sighes was the incumbrances raised upon this most Noble and free service which through the evill of times by this meanes became the most burthensome and the onely loathed and abhorred service of all the rest I say through the evill of times for it cannot lodge in my thoughts but in the Norman times the incumbrances were nothing so great as of latter ages and that much hath been imputed to the Lawes of the Conquerour which they never deserved as may appeare in these particulars which the Laws of Henry the first have preserved in memory Tenant of the King or other Lord dying 1 Reliefe M. Paris An. 1100 1213 his heire shall pay no other reliefe then what by Law is due That which by Law is due is set down in the laws of William the Conquerour The Reliefe of an Earle Ll. Gulielm cap. 12. 8. Horses sadled and bridled 4. Helmets 4. Cotes of Maile 4. Shields 4. Speares 4. Swords 4. Chasers bridled and sadled 1. Palfray bridled and sadled The Reliefe of a Baron Ibid. c. 23. 4. Horses with Saddles Bridles 2. Helmets 2. Cotes of Maile 2. Sheilds 2. Speares 2. Swords 2. Chasers bridled and sadled 1. Palfray bridled and sadled The Reliefe of a Vavasor to his Lord Ibid. c. 24. His best Horse His Helmet His Cote of Maile His Shield His Speare His Sword Or if he had no Armes then he was to pay s. 100 The reliefe of the Countrey man is the best beast that is in his possession Ll. Gulielm cap. 29. and of him that farmeth his Lands a yeeres rent These are the Reliefes due by law and now setled in goods or armes but afterwards turned into money and its likely that the ill customes in the former times did extort both money and armes or such summes of money as they pleased and by the very words of the law it seemes they had brought it to an arbitrary power to take what they could get and yet all against Law 2. Marriage The Kings tenant shall advise with the King in marriage of his daughter sister neece or kinswoman and his widdow in like manner The sence hereof in short is that these might marry at their own will without paying fine or composition to the Lord and yet must have the liking of the Lord so farre as to declare whether the man intended were his enemy or not and fit to performe Knight service This law was therefore grounded upon the present distresse of affaires wherein the nation was unsetled and common right having established a mutuall trust between Lord and Tenant found out this meanes to preserve the same for if the marriages of those that are related to the Tenant in such manner as may inherit part or all his lands or have joynture therein should be left altogether at the liberty of the Tenant or his widow it must needs follow that the mutuall trust between Lord and Tenant must faile and the publique receive dammage And therefore if this custome were of Norman birth it was begotten bpon a Saxon law and might the rather be owned by the English 3. Dower The widdow of the Kings Tenant having children shall have her dower and portion so long as she keeps unmarried The portion here is in the Latine word maritagium which I take to be the marriage portion given by the husband according to the Saxon custome when as the dower in land was not in use whereof is spoken formerly in that Chapter of dower And the Normans were necessitated to introduce this custome of theirs with themselves partly because it was a priviledge which was their own by birth and it could not be waved without an evident wrong done to the wives of these men who had ventured their lives in that service but principally because it would not consist with
this day hold the last in custome to all intents whatsoever The last branch provideth the remedy to recover to the heire his possession in case it be detained either through doubtfulnesse of age of the heire or his title and it directs the issue to be tried by twelve men This triall some have thought to be of Glanvils invention and it may well be that this triall of this matter as thus set down was directed by him yet he useth often in his booke the word solet and in his preface saith that he will set down frequentius usitata and its past question but that the triall by twelve men was much more ancient as hath been already noted One thing more yet remaineth concerning the widdow of the tenant whose dower is not onely provided for but her reasonable part of her husbands personall estate The originall hereof was from the Normans and it was as popular as that of Wardships was Regall and so they made the English women as sure to them as they were sure of their children The Justices shall by Assize try disseisins done since the Kings 10. comming over Sea next after the peace made between him and his sonne This is called the Assize of Novel disseisin or of disseisins lately made It seems that the limitation was set for the Justices sake who now were appointed to that worke which formerly belonged to the County courts Glanv lib. 13. cap. 33. and to prevent intrenchments of Courts a limitation was determined although the copy seemeth to be mistaken for the limitation in the writ is from the Kings last voyage or going into Normandy Justices shall doe right upon the Kings writ for halfe a 11. Knights fee and under unlesse in cases of difficulty which are to be referred to the King The Justices itinerant ended the smaller matters in their circuits the other were reserved to the King in his bench Justices shall inquire of Escheates Lands Churches and 12. women in the Kings gift And of Castle guard who how much and where So as the Judges itinerant had the worke of Escheators and made their circuits serve as well for the Kings profit as Justice to the subjects They used also to take fealty of the people to the King at one certaine time of the yeere and to demand homage also These matters of the Kings Exchequer made the presence of the Judges lesse acceptable and it may be occasioned some kind of oppression And as touching Castleguard it was a tenure in great use in these bloody times and yet it seemeth they used to take rent instead of the personall service else had that enquiry how much been improper 13. Of a tenants holding and of severall Lords That one man may hold severall lands of severall Lords and so owe service to them all is so common as nothing can be more neverthelesse it will not be altogether out of the way to touch somewhat upon the nature of this mutuall relation between Lord and Tenant in generall that the true nature of the diversity may more fully appeare The foundation or subject of service was a piece of land or other tenement at the first given by the Lord to the Tenant in affirmance of a stipulation between them presupposed by the giving and receiving whereof the tenant undertooke to performe service to the Lord Glanv lib. 9. cap. 4. and the Lord undertooke protection of the tenant in his right to that tenement The service was first by promise solemnly bound either by oath which the Lord or his deputy by the common law hath power to administer as in the case of fealty in which the tenant bound himselfe to be true to the honour and safety of his Lords person and to perform the service due to the Lord for the tenement so given or otherwise by the tenants humble acknowledgement and promise not onely to performe the services due but even to be devoted to the Lords service to honour him and to adventure limbe and life and to be true and faithfull to the Lord. This is called Homage from those words I become your man Sir and yet promiseth upon the matter no more but fealty in a deeper complement albeit there be difference in the adjuncts belonging to each For though it be true that by promise of being the Lords man a generall service may seem to be implied yet in regard that it is upon occasion onely of that present tenure it seemeth to me that it is to be restrained onely to those particular services which belong to that tenement and therefore if that tenement be holden in soccage although the tenant be bound to homage yet that homage ties not the tenant to the service of a Knight Lit. lib. 2. cap. 5 nor contrarily doth the homage of a tenant in Knight service tie him to that of socage upon the command of his Lord though he professeth himselfe to be his man Nor doth the tenants homage binde him against all men nor ad semper for in case he holdeth of two or divers Lords by homage for severall tenements Glanv lib. 9. cap. 1. Lib. 7. cap. 10. and these two Lords be in warre one against the other the tenant must serve his chiefe Lord of whom the capitall house is holden or that Lord which was his by priority who may be called the chiefe Lord because having first received homage he received it absolutely from his tenant but all other Lords receive homage of such tenant with a saving of the tenants faith made to other Lords and to the King who in order to the publique had power to command a tenant into warre against his own Lord. If therefore he be commanded by the King in such cases unto warre he need not question the point of forfeiture Glanvil lib. 9. cap. 1. but if he be commanded by a chiefe of his other Lords into warre against a party in which another of his Lords is engaged his safest way is to enter upon the worke because of his allegiancc to that Lord yet with a salvo of his fealty to that other Lord. Ibid. cap. 4. But in all ordinary cases tenants and Lords must have regard to their stipulation for otherwise if either breake the other is discharged for ever and if the fault be in the tenant his tenement escheats to his Lord and if the Lord faile he loses his tenure and the tenant might thence forth disclaime and hold over for ever Neverthelesse the Lords had two priviledges by common custome belonging to their tenures which although not mentioned in the stipulation were yet more valuable then all the rest the one concerning matter of profit the other of power That of profit consisted in ayds and reliefe The ayds were of three kinds Ibid. c. 8. one to make the Lords eldest sonne Knight the other to marry his eldest daughter the third to helpe him to pay a reliefe to his Lord Paramont which in my opinion
sounds as much as if the tenants were bound by their tenures to ayd their Lord in all cases of extraordinary charge saving that the Lord could not distraine his tenant for ayd to his warre and this according to the Lords discretion Ibid. for Glanvile Glanv l. 9. c. 8 saith that the law determined nothing concerning the quantity or valew of these ayds These were the Norman waies and savoured so much of Lordship that within that age they were regulated But that of reliefes was an ancient sacrifice as of first fruits of the tenement to the Lord in memoriall of the first Lords favour in conferring that tenement Ibid. and it was first setled in the Saxons time The Lords priviledge of power extended so farre as to distraine his tenants into his own Court to answer to himselfe in all causes that concerned his right and so the Lord became both Judge and party which was soon felt and prevented as shall appeare hereafter Another priviledge of the Lords power was over the tenants heire after the tenants death in the disposing of the body during the minority and marriage of the same As touching the disposing of the body the Lord either retained the same in his own power Glanv 7.10 or committed the same to others and this was done either pleno jure or rendring an account Ibid. c. 12. As concerning the marriage of the females that are heires or so apparent the parents in their life time cannot marry them without the Lords consent nor may they marry themselves after their parents death without the same and the Lords are bound to give their consent unlesse they can shew cause to the contrary The like also of the tenants widdows that have any dowry in the lands of such tenure And by such like means as these the power of the Barons grew to that height that in the lump it was too massie both for Prince and Commons 14. Of the power of the last Will. It is a received opinion that at the common law no man could devise his lands by his last will If thereby it be conceived to be against common reason I shall not touch that but if against custome of the ancient times I must suspend my concurrence therewith untill those ancient times be defined for as yet I finde no testimony sufficient to assert that opinion but rather that the times hitherto had a sacred opinion of the last will as of the most serious sincere and advised declaration of the most inward desires of a man which was the main thing looked unto in all conveyances Voluntas donatoris de cetero observetur And therefore nothing was more ordinary then for Kings in these times as much as in them did lie to dispose of their Crowns by their last Will. M. Paris An. 1216. Hoveden An. 1199. Malmsb. nov l. 1. Malmsb. l. 3. Thus King John appointed Henry the third his successor and Richard the first devised the Crown to King John and Henry the first gave all his lands to his daughter and William the Conquerour by his last will gave Normandy to Robert England to William and to Henry his mothers lands If then things of greatest moment under Heaven were ordinarily disposed by the last Will was it then probable that the smaller free holds should be of too high esteem to be credited to such conveyances I would not be mistaken as if I thought that Crowns and Empires were at the disposall of the last will of the possessour nor doe I thinke that either they were thus in this Kingdome or that there is any reason that can patronize that opinion yet it will be apparent that Kings had no sleight conceit of the last will and knew no such infirmity in that manner of conveyance as is pretended or else would they never have spent that little breath left them in vaine Glanvil l. 7. cap. 1 5. I have observed the words of Glanvile concerning this point and I cannot finde that he positively denieth all conveyance of land by Will but onely in case of disherison the ground whereof is because its contrary to the conveyance of the law and yet in that case also alloweth of a disposing power by consent of the heire which could never make good conveyance if the will in that case were absolutely voide and therefore his authority lies not in the way Nor doth the particular customes of places discountenance but rather advance this opinion for if devise of lands were incident to the tenure in Gavell kind and that so generall in old time as also to the burgage tenures Ll. Gulielm cap. 61. which were the rules of Corporation and Cities Vbi leges Angliae deperiri non possunt nec defraudari nec violari how can it be said contrary to the common law And therefore those conveyances of lands by last will that were in and after these times holden in use seem to me rather remnants of the more generall custome wasted by positive lawes then particular customes growing up against the common rule It s true that the Clergy put a power into the Pope to alter the law M. Paris An. 1181. Hoved An. 1181. Decret Alex. pap Hoveden fo 587. as touching themselves in some cases for Roger Archbishop of Yorke procured a faculty from the Pope to ordaine that no Ecclesiasticall persons Will should be good unlesse made in health and not lying in extremity and that in such cases the Archbishop should possesse himselfe of all such parties goods but as it lasted not long so was himselfe made a president in the case for being overtaken with death ere he was provided he made his will in his sicknesse and Henry the second possessed himselfe of his estate And it s as true that Femme coverts in these daies could make no will of their reasonable part Glanv l. 7. cap. 5 16. because by the Saxon law it belonged joyntly to the children Nor could usurers continuing in that course at the time of their death make their will because their personall estate belonged to the King after their death and their lands to their Lords by escheate although before death they lie open to no censure of law but this was by an especiall law made since the Conquerours time for by the Saxon law they were reputed as outlaws Neverthelesse all these doe but strengthen the generall rule Ll. Edw. 37. viz. that regularly the last will was holden in the generall a good conveyance in law If the will were onely intended and not perfected or no will was made then the lands passed by descent and the goods held course according to the Saxon law Glanv l. 7. c. 6. cap. 8. viz. the next kinsmen and friends of the intestate did administer and as administrators they might sue by Writ out of the Kings court although the Clergy had now obtained so much power as for the recovery of a legacy or for the determining
was in those elder times but in two cases viz. of Kings and Castles in the one of which the government is principally concerned in the other the publique defence For it may be well conjectured that Castles were either first made in places commodious for habitation and great Towns gathered to them for their better safety or that the Townes were first gathered in places of commodious habitation and then Castles were made for their better defence or if they were imposed upon them by the victor to keepe them in awe they were neverthelesse by continuance together become tractable and conspired for the mutuall defence of each other But as touching such Cittadels or Castles that were set in solitary places they may seem rather first intended for the particular defence of some particular man and his family and neighbouring tenants and therefore in the purveyance for Castles it seems the proper Town wherein it is is principally liable to that duty because their safety is more principally interested and therefore prizes there taken may be payd at a day to come but in all other places immediately Neverthelesse this lasted not long for the souldiers found out a tricke of favouring their own quarters and preserving them in heart against a back winter knowing that at such times its better to seeke for provision nigh then to be compelled to seeke far off But this Stratagem was cut off by the next King who inhibited all manner of purveyance in any other Town Westm 1. cap. 7 then in the same Town wherein the Castle is seated This was a charge that was but temporary and occasionall That which was more lasting and burdensome upon the subjects was purveyance for the King which neverthelesse cannot be avoyded by reason of the greatnesse of his retinue especially in those daies and if they should have their resort to the market the same could not be free to the people for that the first service must be for the Kings household and so what scraps will be left for the Commons no man can tell It was therefore necessary for the Kings family to be maintained by purveyance Artic. super cart cap. 2. and to avoyd the many inconveniences which might and did arise in those spoyling times It was ordained that it should be felony for any purveyor to purvy without warrant 2. That none but the Kings purveyour must purvey for the Kings house and that he must purvey onely for the Kings house and to purvey no more then is necessary and to pay for the things they take And because Kings were oftentimes necessitated for removall from place to place purveyance of carriage was also allowed West 1. c. 32. and in case the subjects were grieved either by more purveyance then was necessary or by non payment for their commodities so taken or with composition for the Kings debts for such purveyance the offenders were lyable to fine and imprisonment Artic super cart cap. 2. Or if they were grieved by purveyours without warrant the offender was to be proceeded against as in case of felony He that serveth in Castle-guard is not liable to payment of rent for that service cap. 22. Nor is he compellable to either so long as he is in the service in the Army By the ancient custome none but a Knight might be charged with the guard of a Castle belonging to the King for the letter of this law mentioneth onely such and therefore to hold by Castle-guard is a tenure in Knight-service and it seemeth that rent for Castle guard originally was consistent with Knightservice and that it was not annuall but promiscuously Knights might either performe the service or pay rent in lieu thereof and upon occasion did neither if the King sent them into the field And lastly that a Knight might either doe the service in his own person or by his Esquire or another appointed by him thereto No Knights nor Lords nor Church-mens Carriages cap. 23. nor no mans wood shall be taken against the owners consent Nor shall any mans Carriages be taken if he will pay the hire limited by the Law Churchmen were exempted from charge to the Kings carriages meerely in favour to the Canon which exempted the goods of the Clergy from such lay service neverthelesse the complaints of the Clergy formerly mentioned shew that this was not duely observed Knights and Lords were discharged not onely for the maintenance of their port but more principally because they were publique servants for the defence of the Kingdome in time of warre and the Kingdome was then equally served by themselves and their equipage and their carriages as a necessary assistant thereunto The King shall have no more profit of felons Lands then the yeere and a day cap. 24. and the Lord is to have the remainder Anciently the Lords had all the estate of felons being their tenants Instit 2. and the King had onely the prerogative to waste them as a penalty or part thereof but afterwards the Lords by agreement yeelded unto the King the yeere and a daies profit to save the Lands from spoile Bract. lib. 3. fo 137. Prerog Reg. cap. 16. and in continuance of time the King had both the yeere and day and waste Fugitives also were in the same case viz. such as deserted their Countrey either in time of need or such as fled from the triall of Law in criminall cases for in both cases the Saxons accounted them as common felons Neverthelesse the two customes of Gloucester and Kent are saved out of this law by the Statute the first whereof saves the Land to the heire from the Lord and the second saves the same to the heires males or for want of such to the heires females and to the wife her moity untill she be espoused to another man Prerog Reg. cap. 14. Fits 2 E. 2. Tit. Escheat 12. unlesse she shall forfeit the same by fornication during her widdowhood And by the same law also the King had all Escheates of the tenants of Archbshops and Bishops during the vacancy as a perquisite But Escheats of Land and Tenement in Cities or Burroughs the King had them in jure coronae of whomsoever they were holden cap. 25. All weares shall be destroyed but such as are by the Sea coaste The Lieutenant of the Tower of London as it seemed claimed a Lordship in the Thames and by vertue thereof had all the weares to his own use as appeareth by a Charter made to the City of London recited in the second institutes upon this Law and this was to the detriment of the free men especially of the City of London in regard that all free men were to have right of free passage through Rivers as well as through high waies and purprestures in either were equally noxious to the common liberty and therefore that which is set down under the example or instance of the rivers of Thames and Medway contained all the rivers in
further worke to make a man a Knight then his bare tenure for such onely were milites facti who had both Lands sufficient to maintaine the Armes and state of a Knight and also a body fit to undertake the service in his own person and whereof he had given sufficient proofe in the field Others that had Land either had not sufficient maintenance or not habiliments of person and as not expected were laid aside of this sort were many by reason of the late civill warres in which they had much impaired both their bodies and estates This rendred the strength of the Kingdome and Militia so much decayed and the minds of men so weared that they began to love ease before the times would brooke it and a cessation from Arme before they had any mind to peace The Parliament espied the danger how necessary it was for the people to be well armed in these times of generall broile and upon that ground allowed this law to passe that all such as had Lands worth 20 li. yeerly besides reprisals should be ready not to be Knights nor under the favour of others is there any ancient president to warrant it but to finde or to enter the field with the Armes of a Knight or provide some able person to serve in their stead unlesse they were under 21 yeeres of age and so not grown up to full strength of body nor their lands in their own possession but in custody of their Lords or guardians Neverthelesse of such as were grown to full age yet were maimed impotent or of meane estate and tenants by service of a Knight it was had into a way of moderation and ordered that such should pay a reasonable fine for respit of such service nor further as concerning their persons were they bound But as touthing such that were under present onely and not perpetuall disabilities of body upon them incumbent as often as occasion called they served by their deputies or servants all which was grounded not onely upon the law of Henry the second but also upon common right of tenure The armes that these men were to finde are said to be those belonging to a Knight which were partly for defence and partly for offence of the first sort were the Shield the Helmet the Hauberk or Brestplate or coate of maile Of the second sort were the Sword and Lance And unto all a horse must be provided These Armes especially the defensive haue been formerly under alteration for the Brestplate could not be worne with the coate of maile and therefore must be used as occasion was provided of either and for this cause the service of a Knight is called by severall names sometimes from the horse sometimes from the Lance sometimes from the Helmet and not seldome from the coat of maile The power of immediate command or calling forth the Knights to their service in its own nature was but ministeriall and subservient to that power that ordered warre to be leavied and therefore as in the first-Saxon government under their Princes in Germany so after under their Kings Tacitur warre was never resolved upon but if it were defensive it was by the counsell of Lords if offensive by the generall vote of the grand Councell of the Kingdome so by vertue of such order either from the Councell of Lords or grand Councell the Knights were called forth to warre and others as the case required summoned to a rendezvouz and this instumentall power regularly rested in the Lords to whom such service was due and the Lords were summoned by the Lord Paramont as chiefe of the fee of which their tenants were holden and not as King or chiefe Captaine in the field for they were not raised by Proclamation but by summons issued forth to the Sheriffe with distresse and this onely against such as were within his own fee and held of the Crown The King therefore might have many Knights at his command but the Lords more and if those Lords failed in their due correspondency with the King all those of the inferiour orbe were carried away after them so the King is left to shift for himselfe as well as he can and this might be occasioned not onely from their tenures by which they stood obliged to the inferiour Lords but probably much more by their popularity which was more prevalent by how much Kings looked upon the Commons at a further distance in those daies then in after times when the Commons interposed intentively in the publique government And thus the Horsemen of England becomming lesse constant in adhearing to their Soveraigne in the field occasioned Kings to betake themselves to their foot and to forme the strength of their battels wholly in them and themselves on foot to engage with them One point of liberty these Souldiers by tenure had which made their service not altogether servile and that was that their service in the field was neither indefinite nor infinite but circumscribed by place time and end The time of their service for the continuance of it was for a set time if it were at their own charges and although some had a shorter time yet the generall sort were restrained to forty daies For the courage of those times consisted not in wearying and wasting the Souldier in the field by delayes and long worke in wheeling about and retiring but in playing their prizes like two combitants of resolution to get victory by valour or to die If upon extraordinary occasions the warre continued longer then the tenant served upon the pay of the common purse The end of the service of the Tenant viz. their Lords defence in the defence of the Kingdom stinted their work within certain bounds of place beyond which they were not to be drawn unlesse of their own accord and these were the borders of the Dominion of the Crown of England which in those daies extended into Scotland on the North and into a great part of France on the South And therefore the Earle Marshall of England being by Edw. 1. commanded by vertue of his tenure to attend in person upon the Standart under his Lieutenant that then was to be sent into Flanders which was no part of the Dominion of England refused and notwithstanding the Kings threats to hang him yet he persisted saying he would neither goe nor hang. Not onely because the tenants by Knight service are bound to the defence of their Lords persons and not of their Lieutenants but principally because they are to serve for the safety and defence of the Kingdom and therefore ought not to be drawn into forraine Countries Nor did the Earle marshall onely this Walsing fo 69. 71. but many others also both Knights and Knights fellows having twenty pounds per annum for all these with their armes were summoned to serve under the Kings pay in Flanders I say multitudes of them refused to serve and afterwards joyned with the rest of the Commons in a Petition to the
as foure yeeres for within that time Richard Lucy one of the Justices had renounced his Office and betaken himselfe to a cloister and yet was neither named in the first commission nor in the latter nor did the last commission continue five yeers Hoved. An. 1184. for within that time Ralph Glanvile removed from the Northerne circuit to that of Worcester as by the story of Sir Gilbert Plumpton may appeare though little to the honour of the justice of the Kingdome or of that Judge however his book commended him to posterity I take it upon the credit of the reporter Co. jurisd c. 33 that this Itinerary judicature was setled to hold every seven yeeres but I finde no monument thereof before these daies As touching their power certainly it was in point of judicature as large as that of the court of Lords though not so high it was as large because they had cognisance of all causes both concerning the Crown and common pleas and amongst those of the Crown this onely I shall note that all manner of falshood was inquirable by those Judges which after came to be much invaded by the Clergy Hoveden Glanvil l. 14. c. 7. I shall say no more of this but that in their originall these Iters were little other then visitations of the Countrey by the grand Councell of Lords Nor shall I adde any thing concerning the Vicontiel courts and other inferiour but what I finde in Glanvile that though robbery belonged to the Kings court Glanv lib. 1. cap. 2. yet thefts belonged to the Sheriffs Court and if the Lords court intercepts not all batteries and woundings unlesse in the complaint they be charged to be done contra pacem Domini Regis the like also of inferiour trespasses Idem lib. 9. 10. besides common pleas whereof more shall follow in the next Chapter as occasion shall be CHAP. LXII Of certaine Laws of Iudicature in the time of Henry the second ANd hereof I shall note onely a few as well touching matters of the Crown as of property being desirous to observe the changes of Law with the times and the manner of the growth thereof to that pitch which in these times it hath attained We cannot finde in any story that the Saxon Church was infested with any Heresie from their first entrance till this present generation The first and last Heresie 1. Heresie that ever troubled this Island was inbred by Pelagius but that was amongst the Britons and was first battered by the Councell or Synod under Germanus but afterwards suppressed by the zeale of the Saxons who liked nothing of the Brittish breed and for whose sake it suffered more happly then for the foulnesse of the opinion The Saxon church leavened from Rome for the space of above five hundred yeeres held on its course without any intermission by crosse doctrine springing up Hoved. 585. till the time of Henry the second Then entred a sect whom they called Publicans but were the Albigenses as may appeare by the decree of Pope Alexander whose opinions I shall not trouble my course with but it seems they were such as crossed their way and Henry the second made the first president of punishing Heresie in this Kingdome unders the name of this Sect whom he caused to be brought before a councell of Bishops Nubrig l. 2. cap. 13. who endeavoured to convince them of their errour but failing therein they pronounced them Hereticks and delivered them over to the Lay power by which means they were branded in the forehead whipped and exposed to extremity of the cold according to the decree of the Church died Decret Papae Alexand. Hoveden 585. This was the manner and punishment of Hereticks in this Kingdome in those daies albeit it seemeth they were then decreed to be burnt in other countries if that relation of Cogshall be true which Picardus noteth upon the 13 chapter of the History of William of Newberry out of which I have incerted this relation Another case we meet with in Henry the seconds time concerning Apostacy 2. Apostacy Bracton lib. 3. cap. 9. which was a crime that as it seems died as soon as it was born for besides that one we finde no second thereto in all the file of English story The particular was that a Clerke had renounced his baptisme and turned Jew and for this was convicted by a councell of Bishops at Oxford and was burned So as we have Apostacy punished with death and Heresie with a punishment that proved mortall and the manner of conviction of both by a councell of the Clergy and delivered over to the Lay power who certainly proceeded according to the direction of the Canon or advice of the councell These if no more were sufficient to demonstrate the growing power of the Clergy however brave the King was against all his enemies in the field Treason 3. Treason was anciently used onely as a crime of breach of trust or fealty as hath been already noted now it grows into a sadder temper and is made all one with that of laesa Majestas and that Majesty that now a daies is wrapped up wholly in the person of the King was in Henry the seconds time imparted to the King and Kingdom as in the first times it was more related to the Kingdome And therefore Glanvile in his booke of laws speaking of the wound of Majesty exemplifies sedition and destruction of the Kingdome to be in equall degree a Lib. 1. cap. 2. wound of Majesty Lib. 10. cap. 1. with the destruction of the person of the King and then he nameth sedition in the Army and fraudulent conversion of Treasure trove which properly belongs to the King All which he saith are punished with death and forfeiture of estate and corruption of blood for so I take the meaning of the words in relation to what ensueth Fellonies 4. Felonies of Manslaughter Burning Robbery Ravishment and Fausonry are to be punished with losse of member and estate This was the law derived from the Normans and accordingly was the direction in the charge given to the Justices itinerant in Henry the seconds time as appeareth in Hoveden But treason or treachery against the oath fealty Ll. Hen. 1. c. 25. or bond of allegiance as of the servants against the Lord was punished with certaine and with painfull deaths and therefore though the murther of the King was treason yet the murder of his sonne was no other then as of another man unlesse it arose from those of his own servants Ll. Hen. 1. c. 79 The penalty of losse of estate was common both to Treason and Felony it reached even unto Thefts in which case the forfeiture as to the moveables Glanvil lib. 7. cap. 17. was to the Sheriffe of the County unto whose cognisance the case did belong and the land went to the Lord immediately and not to the King But in all cases of Felony of