Lands to the use of himselfe and of the heires males of his body And for default thereof to the use of the Queene her heires and successors After the Tenant in tayle in possession suffereth a common recoverie with voucher And whether it was a barre to the issue in tayle was the question And it was adjudged that the issue in tayle was barred for good considerations are too general to raise any use without speciall averment that valuable or other good consideration was given Resolved that the Land should continue in his name and bloud is not a consideration to raise a use to the Queene though the limitation to her were for the preservation of the tayle against discontinuances and barres for there wants quid pro quo Resolved if he had said in consideration that the Queene is the head of the weale publique and hath the care and charge as well to preserve peace as for to repell hostility yet 't is no good consideration for Kings ex officio ought to governe their Subjects in tranquillity which is implyed in the word King And admit the consideration had been sufficient to raise a use to the Queene yet that would not preserve the estate tayle by force of the Act 34. H. 8. for no estate tayle is preserved by the said Act except the same estate tayle be of the creation or provision of the King and not where the estate tayle is given or created of a common person without provision of the King as may appeare by the preamble of the Act. Resolved that before the Statute of 34. H. 8. a common recovery barred a tayle created by the King Lanes Case 29. Eliz. fo 16. THe Queene seised of a Mannor in right of her Crowne by her Steward granted coppie-hold Lands parcell thereof to one by coppie according to the custome in Fee And after the Queene under the Exchequer Seale made a Lease of the same Lands to another for 21. yeares who granted the same Tearme to the coppie-holder and after the Queene reciting the Lease for yeares granted the reversion thereof in Fee the Tearme of 21. yeares expired The Patentee of the reversion entreth upon the coppie-holder and the entrie was adjudged good Resolved that the Lease under the Exchequer Seale was good by the usage there for the course of every Court is as a law of which the common law takes notice without alledging of it in pleading and every Court at Westminster is bound to take notice of the Customes of other Courts otherwise of Courts in the Countrey and the order of Exchequer is to make Leases by Committimus such land Resolved that the estate of the Coppie-holder was determined by the acceptance of the Lease for yeares And so it was adjudged against the Coppie-holder for notwithstanding that the Coppie-holders estate is taken to be but an estate at will yet the custome hath so established the estate of the Coppieholder that he is not removeable at the will of the Lord so long as he performes his customes and services and by the same reason the Lord cannot determine his interest by any act that he can doe And so it hath been adjudged many times And the aceptance of this Lease was the proper act of the Coppie-holder Resolved that by the severance of the free-hold from the Mannor the Coppiehold estate is not extinguished Baldwyns Case 31. Eliz. fo 23. THings which lye in grant and take their essence and effect by delivery of a Deed without other ceremony as rent or common out of Lands c. by the premisses of the Deed to one and his heires habendum to the grantee for yeares or life this habendum is repugnant to the premisses for the Fee passeth by the premises by the delivery of the Deed and therefore the habendum is voyd And when a man giveth Lands by Deed in Fee by the premisses habendum to the Lessee for life there the habendum is voyd and when livery is made the effect of the Deed shall be taken the most strongly against the Feoffor and the best for the Feoffee When a ceremony is requisite to the perfection of an estate in the premisses limitted and to the estate limitted in the habendum no ceremony is requisite but onely the delivery of the Deed although the habendum be of meaner estate then the premisses the habendum shall stand good and qualifie the generalitie of the premisses as a Fee granted in the premisses habendum for yeares it is for yeares and no inheritance Note There is a diversity betwixt the estate implied in the premisses and expressed as if A. grant a rent to B. this is an estate for life but if the habendum be for yeares this is good and qualifies the implication of the premisses Case of Bankrupts 31. Eliz fo 25. REsolved that a grant or assignement of goods by a Bankrupt after the Commission awarded which is matter of Record of which every one ought to take notice and though to a Creditor in satisfaction of his debt is voyd and that a sale of such goods by the Commissioners is good Which sale by the Statute of 13. of the Queene ought to be equall to every one rate and rate like according to the quantity c. And the Court resolved that the proviso in the said Statute concerning gifts bona fide doth not make any gift good but excludes them out of the penalty c. Commissioners may sell by Deed without Inrollment and though they have not seene the goods agreed that the distribution ought to be severall not joynt for the one debt may be greater then the other and in this case the Jury found that the Commissioners sold the goods to three Creditors joyntly but further that the Bankrupt was indebted to them in 273. pounds which shall be intended a joynt debt and so good Resolved that the act giveth benefit to such as will come and not to them that refuse vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt and every Creditor may take notice of the Commission being matter of Record Bettisworths Case 33. Eliz. in communi Banco fo 31. A Lease for yeares was made of one Messuage one Close called Raynolds and of divers other Lands in Dale and afterwards the Lessee being in the house the Lessor entred into the same Close and maketh a Feoffment of the Messuage and of the Lands therewith demised and maketh livery in the same Close and afterwards the Lessee reentreth into the said Close And if this was a good Feoffment and livery of seison of the said Close the Lessee nor any for him being in the said Close was the question And it was adjudged that the livery and seison was voyd as well for the Close as for the Messuage and the other Land therewith demised For the Possession of the Messuage which is his Castle is a good possession of the Lands therewith demised and it matters not whether livery be made on the Land within view of the
the husband had and to the remainder A. tenant in taile the remainder to B. the remainder to C. the remainder to D. A. makes a Feoffement the feoffee suffers a recovery B. is vouched and he vouches the common vouchee A. is not bound but B. and all the remainders are for though the remainders are discontinued and cannot be remitted till the taile be recontinued yet in a common recovery which is the common assurance he which comes in as vouchee shall be in judgement of Law in privity of the estate which he ever had though the precedent estate upon which the estate of the vouchee depends be discontinued so here the husband shall be said in of the taile and 't is the stronger because the estate of the wife was put to a right so that the husband came in as sole tenant in taile and not joyntly with his wife because she is not vouchee and he cannot be in of another estate because once he had a taile but had they had a joynt estate to them and the heires of their two bodies he being onely vouched it might be doubted whether the taile should be barred because the wife had a joynt inheritance with him 8. of the Queene Dyer Knivetons case A Praecipe is brought against tenant for life and the remainder in taile they vouch over it shall not binde the taile for the remainder is not tenant to the Praecipe and the land is recovered against the tenant for life onely and recompence shall not goe to the remainder and the remainder was never seised by force of the taile and so 't was adjudged in Leach and Coles case 41. of the Queene Heydons case 26. of the Queene fo 7. THe Gardians and Cannons Regular of the late Colledge of O. seised of the Mannor of O. granted a Coppihold to Father and Sonne for their lives c. and after they leased it to H. for fourescore yeares rendring the ancient Rent and after surrendred their Colledge Resolved that the lease to H. was voyd the Coppi-hold for life continuing by the Statute of 31. H. 8. For Coppihold is an estate for life and the Statute saith of which any estate or interest for life c. at the making of such grant had continuance reade the Booke at large where you have admirable rules for true interpretation of all Statutes Resolved when a Parliament alters the service tenure interest of the land c. in prejudice of the Lord custome or tenant the generall words shall not extend to Coppi-holds as the Statute of W. 2. de donis conditionalibus doth not extend to them for if the Statute should alter the estate this should also alter the tenure for the donee ought to hold of the donor and to doe such services without speciall reservation as his donor did to the Lord and the intent of the act was not to extend to such base estates which were taken then but tenants at will and the Statute saith Voluntas donatoris observetur in carta c. So that which shall be intailed ought to be such an hereditament which may be given by Charter and great part of the land within the Realme being granted by Coppy it would be inconvenient that Coppi-holds should be intailed yet neither Fine nor Recovery should barre them so that the owner cannot without making a forfeiture by assent of the Lord and a new grant dispose of it for payment of debts advancement of his wife or younger issues wherefore the Statute doth not extend to them by Manwood Ch' Baron which the Court agreed But 't was objected that the Custome and the Statute cooperating might make a taile as if by a custome a remainder had been limitted over and injoyed and plaints in nature of a Formedon in discender brought and the land recovered by it so neither the custome without the Statute nor the Statute without the custome can make a taile And Littleton saith that if a custome hath been that lands c. have been granted c. or in taile c. paulo post that a Formedon in discender lyes of all tenements which Writ was not at common law Manwood answered if the Statute doth not extend to them without question the custome cannot for before the Statute all estates of inheritance were fee simple and no custome can commence after the Statute for this being made 13. E. 1. is made within time of memory and Littleton is to be intended of a fee simple conditionall for he knew well that no custome could commence after the Statute of W. 2. as appeares in his booke 2. ca. 10. and 34. H. 6. and a Formedon in discender in speciall cases lay at the common Law And by the Court another Act made at the same time which gives an Elegit extends not to Coppiholds for the reason aforesaid but other Statutes made at the same time extend to them as ca ' 3. which gives a Cui in vita receite and ca ' 4. which gives to the particular tenant a Quod ei deforceat Resolved that though 't was not found that the said rents were the usuall rents accustomed to be reserved within 20. yeares before yet because 't was found that the accustomed rent was reserved and a custome goes to all times before it shall be so intended without shewing the contrary and judgement was enterd for the Queene The common Law is founded upon the perfection of reason and not according to any private and sudden conceite or opinion Borastons Case 29. of the Queene fo 19. B. Devised land for eight yeares and after to his executors to performe his will till H. his youngest Sonne come to the age of 21. yeares and when H. comes to 21. yeares then that he shall have to him and his heires H. dyed at the age of 9. yeares Objected that till H. attaines to 21. yeares the land descends to the heire and for that he never attained to 21. yeares this remaines in the heire and the intent appeares by the words that he should not have till he come to 21. yeares and this ought to precede the commencement of the remainder and if land were leased till H. comes to 21. yeares H. then being of 9. yeares 't is no absolute lease for 12. yeares for if H dye before 21. the lease shall be determined which the Court agreed 'T was also said that when the particular estate which should support the remainder may determine before the remainder can commence there the remainder doth not vest presently but depends in contingency If one make a Lease to A. for life and after the death of B. the remainder to another in Fee this remainder depends upon contingency for if A. dye before B. the remainder is voyd A Lease is made to A. for life the remainder to B. for life and if B. dye before A. the remainder to C. for life this is a good remainder upon contingency If A. survive B. which case is all one with
the Donor was in possession and used them and fraud is alwayes apparelled with trust and trust is the cover of fraud Sixthly it was contained in the deed that it was honesty truely and bona fide Et clausulae inconsuetae semper juducunt suspitionem and it was resolved although it was a due debt to Twyne and a good consideration of the deed yet it was not within the proviso of the said Act of 13. Eliz. By which it is provided that the said Act doth not extend to any estate or interest in Lands c. goods and chattells made upon good consideration and Bona fide for although it be upon good and true consideration yet it is not Bona fide for no deed shall be deemed to be made Bona fide within the said proviso that is accompanied with any trust for the proviso saith upon good consideration and Bona fide so as good consideration doth not serve if it be not also Bona fide Therefore good Reader if any deed be made to thee in satisfaction of any debt by one that is indebted unto others also First let it be in publick manner before Neighbours Secondly valued-by good men to a true value Thirdly take them out of the possession of the Donor presently for continuance of possession in the Donor is a marke of trust There are two considerations Viz. Consideration of blood or nature and valuable consideration And if one that is indebted to five severall persons every one 20. l. in consideration of naturall affection doth give all his goods unto his Sonne or Cosen The intention of the Statute was that the consideration in this case should be valuable for equity requires that this deed that defeates others shall be made of as high a consideration as the things are that are so defeated thereby for it is to be presumed that the Father if he had not beene indebted unto others would not dispossesse himselfe of all his goods and subject himselfe to his Cradle And therefore it shall be intended that it was to defeate his Creditors And if a consideration of nature or blood should be a good consideration within this proviso the Statute would serve for little or nothing and no creditor should be sure of his Debt A feoffment made solely in consideration of nature or blood shall not take away the use raysed upon valuable consideration but it shall take away a use raised in consideration of nature for both considerations are in Equali jure and of the same nature Many men marvaile the reason that so many acts and Statutes are dayly made this Verse answereth Queritur ut crèscunt tot magna volumina legis In promptu causa crescit in orbe dolus And because fraud abounds in these dayes more then in former times it was resolved that all Statutes made against fraud shall be liberally expounded for to suppresse the fraud and according to this see severall resolutions in the Booke at large It was resolved that no purchasor may avoyd a precedent conveyance made by fraud but he that is a purchasor for money or other valuable consideration paid for consideration of blood is a good consideration but not such a consideration as is intended by the Statute 27. El. ca 4. for valuable consideration is onely good consideration by the same act Anderson chiefe Justice of the common banck said That a man who is of small capacity and not able to governe his Lands that discends unto him and being disposed to ryot and disorder by the mediation of his friends by open Act conveyes his Lands to them upon trust and confidence that he shall take the profits for his maintainance and that he shall have no power to wast or consume them And after he being seduced by deceitfull and covetous persons bargained for small summes his Lands of great value this bargaine although it were for money was holden to be out of this Statute for this act was made against all fraud and deceit and shall not ayd any purchasor that commeth not to the Lands for good considerations lawfully without fraud or deceit And in this case Twyne was convicted of fraud and he and all the others of a ryot Resolutions P. 44. of the Queene upon the Statutes of Fines fo 84. A. Tenant for life the remainder to B. in taile the remainder to B. and his heires B. levies a Fine hath issue and dyes before all the Proclamations passed the issue then beyond the Sea the Proclamations are made the issue retournes and upon the land claimes the remainder Resolved that the estate which passed was not determined by the death of tenant in taile so if tenant in taile of a rent Advowson Tythes Common c. grants by Deed and dyes for if the issue brings a Formedon for the rent he makes the grant voidable if he distraines or claimes it upon the land he by this determines his election And there is no diversity betwixt tenant in taile of a rent c. and tenant in taile of a reversion or a remainder upon an estate for life though in the first case the issue may have a Formedon presently after the death of tenant in taile Holden by Popham and divers other Justices that the Statute of 32. H. 8. hath inforced the case that the estate which passes by the Fine of tenant in taile shall not be determined by his death for by this 't is provided that Fines levied of any lands c. intailed immediatly after the Fine ingrossed and Proclamations made shall be a barre if the Fine cannot be a barre without continuance the Statute hath provided that the estate shall continue for it provides for all necessary incidents to the perfection and consummation of it Every Fine shall be intended with Proclamations for 't is most beneficiall for the conusee and all Fines being the generall assurance of land are levied according Resolved that though by the death of tenant in taile a right of the estate taile descends to the issue for that the tenant in taile dyed before all the Proclamations passed yet when they are passed without claime this right is barred by the Statute of 32. H. 8. Resolved by all the Judges and Barons but three that the issue in this case being heire and privy cannot by any claime save the right of the taile which is descended to him but that after the Proclamations he shall be barred for 't is provided that every Fine after the ingrossing of it and Proclamation had and made shall be a finall end and conclude as well privies as strangers And if no saving had been all strangers had been barred also and all the exceptions extend onely to Strangers but the issue is privy To the objection if by the equity of the Statutes the issue cannot claime c. to what purpose are the Proclamations with such solemnities Answered 32. H. 8. being an Act of explanaiton of 4. H. 7. as to the Fine by tenant in taile shall
not be taken by any strained construction against the letter for then 't is requisite to have a new Act of explanation upon the explanation sic in infinitum By 4. H. 7. every one hath liberty to pursue a Fine according to the said Act viz. with proclamations c. or without as at common Law and therefore the Act of 32. H. 8. of necessitie prescribes that Proclamations shall be made according to 4. H. 7. to distinguish it from a Fine at common Law and not to inable the issue for to make claime for this should be against the expresse intent of the Act in the preamble and purview Also it should be very inconvenient if when such Fine is levied for a valuable consideration advancement of his issues or payment of his debts and he dyes before Proclamations that all should be avoyded by the claime of the heire when the conusee could not have better assurance by Recovery for that he was not tenant to the Praecipe See the Booke at large in what case the issue in taile may averre seisin in a Stranger quod partes Finis nihil habuerunt what not Objected 1. 't is provided by the Statute de donis c. that as to the issue Finis ipso jure sit nullus 2. That the Statute of 27. E. 1. extends not to the heires in taile as 8. H. 4. is for the issue is not bound by any Record which inures by way of Estoppell 3. 27. E. 1. speakes De finibus ritè levatis and when there wants seisin which is the essence of a Fine 't is not ritè levatus 46. E. 3. that 't is a good plea. Answered the Statute de donis c. was made 13. E. 1. and the Statute of Fines 27. in which the issue is not excepted therefore he is bound and according there is a good opinion 8. H. 4. To the second though the issue was not barred of his right before 4. H. 7. yet he was estopped to say Quod partes Finis nihil habuerunt To the third Finis ritè levatus is intended in due forme of Law which it may be though it be onely by way of conclusion for the same Act ousts the parties from such averment and 46. E. 3. is to be intended of a collaterall auncestor from whom the heire doth not claime the Land and then the averment is good In Conisbies case 't was resolved upon a Fine levied to tenant in taile in remainder by tenant for life and a grant and render of a rent that this was not within the Statutes of 4. H. 7. or 32. H. 8. for the Fine was not of the land it selfe which was intailed but of the rent newly created out of the land And in the Lord Zouches case 't was resolved that 4. H. 7. and 32. H. 8. doe extend to Fines levied by conclusion and shall binde though partes c. nihil habuerunt as if tenant in taile makes a Feoffement or be disseised and levies a Fine for the Statute says All Fines of any lands c. in any wise intailed to the person so levying or to any of his auncestors and in 4. H. 7. the exception Quod partes c. is saved to all persons not party nor privy to the said Fine and the issue in taile is privy for he claimes as heire by discent and if such Fine shall barre where the tenant in taile had nothing though the issue enter after the death of the auncestor before all the Proclamations passe a fortiori here when tenant in taile at the time was seised of an estate though 't were in reversion See Archers case where a Fine shall barre the issue where the Father had onely a possibility at the time of the Fine levied Purslowes case 32. of the Queene tenant in taile levies a Fine Term. P. T. and dyed in August next his daughter being heire to the taile and her husband brought a Formedon and pending the plea the Proclamations passed and 't was agreed by the Court that the tenant shall plead the Fine and the Proclamations which passed pending the Writ shall barre the demandant yet there the issue did all that might be done for the conveyance is the Fine and the Proclamations are but a short repetition of the Fine out of this foure things are to be observed 1. Though after the Fine a right descends to the issue yet after Proclamations the right is barred 2. Though he pursues a Formedon yet after Proclamations he is barred ergo in the principall case he is barred notwithstanding his entry or claime in pays 3. When tenant in taile levies a Fine and dyes before Proclamations the issue is not within any of the savings for then the bringing of a Formedon should avoyd the barre 4. The Proclamations serve for no purpose but to distinguish the Fine from a Fine at the common Law Trin. 4. of the Queene Bendlowes tenant in taile disseised the discontinuee and levied a Fine and tooke an estate by render the discontinuee enters and claimes before all the proclamations passed and avoides the estate after the proclamations passe tenant in taile continues his possession and dyes within the yeare after the entry and claime Resolved that the issue was not Remitted but barred by 32. H. 8. Though the estate was avoyded before all the Proclamations passed Resolved though the issue be beyond the Sea yet because he is privy c. he is bound as if he he were within age covert or non compos Which was agreed by all the Justices Ergo the claime of the issue is not materiall and if Infancy c. should avoyde the Fine no man should be assured of land conveyed THE FOURTH BOOK Vernons Case 14. 15. of the Queene fo 1. IN Dower the tenant shews that the husband made a Feoffement of other Land to the use of himselfe for life and after to the use of the demandant for life c. and averres that the said estate was for her Joynture c. and that the demandant hath entered c. and agreed to the estate the demandant shews that the estate was upon condition for to performe the will of the husband and that divers things were to be performed in it judgement if the tenant shall be admitted c. Resolved that at Common Law a right or title to a Freehold cannot be barred by acceptance of a collaterall satisfaction or recompence As if a disseisor of the Mannor of P. gives to the disseisee the Mannor of S. in satisfaction of all his right c. And therefore 't is said in our Bookes that an accord with satisfaction is a good plea in a personall action where damages are to be recovered not in a reall and therefore no barre in Dower but Dower ad ostium Ecclesiae or ex assensu patris concludes her if she enters after c. for the Law allowes them c. to be Dowers in Law Before 27. most lands were in use
The question was whether they have an estate for life or an inheritance in taile And it was resolved that if they had children at the time of the Demise made then they had but an estate for life But if they had no children then they had an estate of inheritance in taile Sir Edward Cleeres case 42. Eliz. fol. 17. A Man is seized of three acres of Land houlden in Capite and maketh a Feoffment in Fee of two of them to the use of his wife for her life and after maketh a feoffment by Deed of the third acre to the use of such persons and of such estate and estates as he should limitt and appoint by his last Will in writing And afterwards by his last Will in writing hee Devised the said third acre to one in fee and if this Devise was good for all the third acre or not or for two parts thereof or voyd for all was the question And it was adjudged that the Devise was good For the Feoffor by his last Will limitted the estates according to his power reserved to him upon the Feoffment the estates should take effect by force of the Feoffment and the use is directed by the Will So as in this case the Will is onely directory But if he declared his Will by writing without any reference to his authoritie or power as owner of the Land and to limitt no use according to his power In this case the Land being houlden in capite the Devise is good for two parts and voyd for the third part If a man make a Feoffment in Fee of Lands in capite to the use of his last Will although he Devise the Land with reference to the Feoffment yet the Will is voyd for a third part for a Feoffment to the use of his last Will and to the use of him and his heires is all one In this case when the partie had conveyed two parts to the use of his wife by his act executed hee cannot as owner of the Land Devise any part of the residue by his Will and therefore because he hath not an election as in the case put before whether to limit according to his power or Devise the same as owner of the Land for in the case at Barre as owner of the Land having conveyed two parts to the use of his wife he cannot make any Devise The Devise of necessitie must inure to a limitation of the use otherwise the Devise should be altogether voyd Packmans case 37. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 18. WIlson brought an action upon the case upon a trover against Packman The case was thus A man dyed intestate and the Ordinary committed the administration to a stranger and after the next of kindred of the Decedent sued out a Citatiō in the Court Christian to have it repealed and pendente lite the administrator to defeate the plaintiffe selleth the goods of the decedent to the defendant and after the Letters of administration were revoked by sentence and the first sentence anulled and made voyd and the administration granted to the plaintiffe And it was resolved that the action did not lie and in this case the diversitie was houlden betweene a suite by Citation for to countermand or revoke the former administration and an appeale which is alwayes a reversing of a former sentence for an appeale doth suspend the former sentence otherwise of a Citation And in this case because the first administrator had the absolute propertie of the goods in him without question he may sell them to whom he will and although the administration be revoked afterwards yet that cannot defeat the Sale But if the sale or gift be by covine it is voyd against Creditors by the Statute of 13. El. but it is good against a second administrator And if an administrator wast the goods and afterwards the administration is granted to another yet every debtor shall charge him in debt An administration may be granted upon condition and whatsoever the administrator doth before the condition broken is good Gregories case 38. El. Banco Regis fol. 20. VErba aequivoca in dubio posita intelliguntur in digniori potentiori sensu secundum excellentiam as if the speech be or writing of J. S. generally it shall be intended of the father where the father and sonne are both of a name and if it be of two Brothers both of a name it shall be intended of the eldest for these are more worthy so where the Statute of 4. 5. Phil. Ma. speaketh in any Court of Record it shall be intended of the foure Courts at Westminster because the Kings Attorney is attendant there Michelbornes case 38. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 21. THe Court of Marshalsea doth onely hould plea of actions of trespasse within the verge if the one of the parties be of the Kings houshold and in contracts and Covenants where both parties are of the Kings houshold and of none other actions nor persons by the Act of Articuli super Chartas 28. E. 1. Butler Goodalls case 40. El. Banco Regis fol. 21 IT was resolved upon the Statute of 21. H. 8. that a Parson of a Church ought to stay and be Commorant upon his Rectorie viz. upon the Parsonage-house and not in any other house although it be within the Parish but lawfull imprisonment without covine is a good excuse of non-residence also if there be no Parsonage-house for impotentia excusat Legem also sicknesse without fraud if the patient remove by advice of his Councell in Physicke bona fide for better aire and recovery of his health Ambrosia Gorges case 40. El. fol. 22. in Cur. Wardorum IT was resolved that the Father shall have the Wardship of his Daughter and heire apparent so long as shee continueth his heire apparent But when the Father hath issue a sonne then shee shall be in ward to the Queene for then he is heire apparant and not the Daughter Ambrosia was daughter of Sir Arthur Gorge by Douglas Daughter and heire of Vicount Bindon and was married to Francis Gorge which Francis dyed when Ambrosia was of ten yeares of age It was resolved also that the Queene notwithstanding the said marriage should have the Wardship of the said Ambrosia for it was not a compleat marriage because to every marriage there ought to be a consent For consensus non concubitus facis matrimonium consentire non possunt ante annos nubiles And upon conference had with the Civilians it was agreed after such a marriage if the husband and the wife marry again it shall not be counted Bigamie And 30. E. 1. tit Gard. 156. if the ancestor marry his heire infra annos nubiles and dye the Lord shall recover the body of the Infant because the heire may disagree It was agreed that the grandfather shall not have the wardship of the sonne within age the father being dead in his life time Marquesse of Winchester his case 41. Eliz. fol. 23.
make a Lease for yeares and after enter into the Land and make wast and the Lessor recover in an Action of wast against the Lessee for life he shall avoid the Lease for yeares made before the wast committed But if a Lessee for life make a Lease for yeares and after enter and make a feoffement in fee the Lessor shall not avoid the Lease for yeares and so if a Tenant make a Lease for yeares and after is attainted of felony or dyeth without heire the Lord by escheate shall not avoide the tearme But because the feoffement in the case at barre was executed by Letter of Attourney it was resolved to be void and the Land escheated to the Queene Jehu Webbes Case 6. Jacobi com banco fo 45. THe King grants the office of the Kings Tennis plaies at W. to one who being disseised brings an assize The Patent shall have a reasonable construction not onely when the King himselfe playes but when any of his Houshould As if a Commission be made to take Singing-Boys in a Cathedrall-Church for the Kings Chappell those that Sing there for their pleasure cannot be taken but such as get their living by it There were but two manner of assizes at the common Law assizes De libero tenemento and De communia pasturae but for no other common but for this onely there is a Writ in the Register But the Statute of W. 2. c. 25. giveth it De proficuo in certo loco capiendo in lieu of a Quod permittat and although that there offices amongst other things are named yet an assize lay of an office at the common Law and although that no Tenant for life may have a Quod permittat yet an assize did lye for him but that is to be understood of an office of profit for it lyeth not of an office of charge Originall Writs made by Statute cannot be altered without Statute In an assize of a new office it ought to be shewed what profit belongs to it but not for an ancient office because that is sufficiently knowne Syms Case 6. Jacobi fo 51. TEnant in taile levyeth a fine with warranty and dyeth the warranty discends upon the issue of him in the remainder inheritable to the taile and another the issue in taile brings a formedon and is barred for all for the warranty is intire and barreth every one upon whom it discends of all his right as if one seised of three acres maketh a feoffement of one with warranty and dyes having issue two Daughters who make partition the Mother purchaseth the part of one brings dower against the feoffee who Vouches the Daughters shee shall recover all the other acre of the other Daughter if Tenant by the curtesie make a feoffement with warranty and dyes and his Sonne heire of the Feme recovers and assets discends after the feoffee shall have a Scire facias to have the Land first recovered by the Statute of Glouc. c. 3. but if assets descend to the Heire in taile bound with a lyneall warranty after recovery in formedon the Feoffee shall have a Scire facias to have the assets for otherwise if the recoverer alien the assets the issue of him will recover the Land in taile againe but in these cases the discontinuee ought to confesse the title of the Demandant and pray that if assets descend after they may discend unto him for if he plead a warranty and assets this is peremptory unto him if it be found that assets did not discend for the Statute is that a Scire facias shall issue out of the rolls of the Justices and in this case there is no ground for the Scire facias in the Record but in this case if the issue in taile pleads no assets and assets are found but not to the value the tenant shall have a Scire facias to recover the assets discended after for that false plea of the Vouchee Warranty and estoppell discend upon the heire generall and warranty barreth although that he upon whom it discends claimeth not by him that made it but so doth not an estoppell but estoppells with recompence binde the right of one who claimeth not by him that made it Roger Earle of Rutlands Case 6. Jacobi fo 55. THe King grants the pannage and herbage of a Park to M. for life and reciting this grants it to the Earle of Rutland for his life 1. Resolved the King hath three manner of inheritances 1. Some which he cannot excercise himselfe and cannot grant them in reversion or remainder as Corodies and Churches of which he is Patron 2. Others which he cannot excercise himselfe but may grant them in reversion or remainder as offices 3. Others which he may excercise himselfe and may grant as Lands Houses c. 2. The King here is not deceived for when he reciteth here that M. had for life and grants for life this inureth as by Law it may that is as a grant in reversion 3. In this case the grant to the Earle shall commence after the determination of the estate of M. and if the King grants Land to one and his Heires Habendum to him and his Assignes it is good and the Habendum shall be rejected for the honour of the King See the Lord Chandos case in the sixth Booke and when a Charter of the King may be taken to two intents good in many cases it shall be taken to such intent as is most beneficiall for the King but if it may be taken to one intent good and to another void then for the honour of the King and benefit of the Subject then it shall be taken so that it may take effect Beechers Case 6. Jacobi fo 58. B. Plaintiffe in Debt Se retraxit by attourney and by the judgement is not amerced he brings eror 1. Resolved a Retraxit ought to be in proper person for at the common Law every one who appeared ought to come in proper person and make his attorney after by license of the Court but if it be without writ he cannot without a writ of Attornato faciendo In cases where one may make an attourney but for contempt is bound to appeare in person if he appeare by attourney this is not error because the court may dispens with the contempt otherwise where he cannot appeare by Law by attorney as here for if he appeare by attourny this is error 2. B. ought to be amerced if upon a Nonsuite a Fortiori upon a Retraxit and although it is for his advantage yet he may assigne it for error because the judgement is not perfect and because it is for the advantage of the King and it shall not be amended because the act of the Court. 3. Where one disclaimes he shall not have a Writ of error because he hath confessed that he had no right otherwise it is upon a Retraxit for this is but a barre of the action à fortiori here where it wat void done by an attourney
shall abate against all but if it be for matter in fact onely as for misnaming one Defendant it shall abate onely against him omission or addition which doth not alter the forme is amendable as if Dei gratia be omitted Voluntary or negligent keeping of Records by the Clerke is amendable by other parts of the Record or by exemplification Count or plea in barr c. which wanteth substance shall not be amended in another Terme but default in the colour because this is the default of the Clerke shall be a Record shall be amended in another Terme by the paper Booke and a thing apparent to be the fault of the Clerke shall be amended in another Terme as rien luydoit de hoc c. predictus defend pro quaerent Nisi prius shall be amended by this Statute if power be given to the Justices to proceed otherwise not as if issue joyned in the Record be mistaken in the Nisi prius it shall not be amended but misprision of dammages shall be because this is not materiall to the issue and it is the default of the Clerke Warrant of attorney and returnes are amendable by this Statute but if there be none at all it is out of the Statute and because this Statute leaveth many cases without remedy the Statutes of 32. H. 8. cap. 30. and 18. Eliz. cap. 14. were made Ten misprisions as yet not remedied 1. Variance materiall betweene the originall and the Count. 2. Want of substance in the originall or Count. 3. Insufficient tryalls 4. If a Coroner returnes the Jury where the Sheriffe ought 5. Lack of name of the Sheriffe to the returne 6. Where no returne is indorced upon the Venire facias 7. When one who is not returned giveth a Verdict 8. Pleas of the Crowne 9. If it appeare to the Court that he who hath a Verdict had no cause of action 10. Errour in Law Cases in the Court of Wardes Myghts Case 7. Jacobi fol. 163. 1. REsolved if J. M. purchase Lands to him and an Infant in fee it cannot be averred that this was to take away the wardship because he never was sole Tenant to the King 2. No feoffement that I. M. can make of his moity can be aver'd to be by collusion c. because without feoffement no wardship shall be and also the Statute speakes of sole seisin 3. A feoffement to the wife or younger Child cannot be averred to be by covin c. upon construction of the Statute of 32. 34. H. 8. where collusion cannot be averred by the Statute of Marlebridge it cannot be now to seize all the Land but it may be for the third part which belongs to the King If a third part be left to the King no averrement of covin may be for the other two parts the Father makes a feoffement to diverse uses the remainder to his second Sonne and dyeth his Eldest Sonne dyes the second Sonne shall not be in ward by averment of covin Digbies Case 7. Jacobi fo 165. TEnant of the King conveys his Lands to the use of himselfe for life the remainder to his Sonne and Heire in taile and after is attainted of Treason the King shall have no wardship of any part of the Land by 32. 34. H. 8. because there is no Heire and livery must be sued in the name of the Heire but the King shall have wardship in such a case before 26. H. 8. because there was an Heire The Earle of Cumberlands Case 7. Jacobi fol. 166. E. 2. granted the Castle and Mannor of S. in taile to R. C. H. 6. granted the reversion to T. C. if the taile be good if not he grants it in possession this is good one way or other and so are many Patents from time to time Paris Stoughters Case 7. Jacobi fol. 168. BY Mandamus it was found that P. S. dyed seised 40. El. and held of the Queen in common socage 7. Jacobi a Melius inquirendum was awarded whither he held of the King by common socage or in chivalry and it is found that he held of the Queene by chivalry This Writ of Melius c. is repugnant and giveth no authority to find this office because a Tenure cannot be of the King in the time of Queene Elizabeth and therefore a new Writ shall be awarded but if the first Melius be good no other shall issue 1. For avoiding Infinitnesse 2. A Diem clausit c. shall not issue upon a Diem c. Nor Mandamus upon a Mandamus so a Melius c. shall not issue upon a Melius 3. If an Office be found against a Subject he shall have a traverse and if upon that it be found against him he hath no remedie So the King shall have but one office and a Melius and no more although that a Tenure be found of two Subjects or one hath an Ouster le maine the King shall not reseise without a Scire facias Toursons Case 8. Jacobi fol. 170. IF Tenant of the King commit Fellony Ao 1. Jaco and after is attainted Ao 3. for the same and after in Ao 4. all is found by office Now this office shall have relation to the time of the Fellony to avoid all meane alienations and incumbrencies but for the meane profits it shall have relation to the time of the Attendor for their the Kings Title appeared of Record and the like Law is of an Ideot But in case of a ward within age the King shall have the meane profits from the death of the Auncestor because he hath it by reason of his Seigniory and he looseth the rent and services in the meane time the difference is when the King seiseth jure protectionis regae or Nomine destrictionis and when Ratione Prioris recti seu tituli Sir Gerrard Fleetewoods Case 8. Jacobi fol. 171. SIr William Fleetewood receiver of the Revennues of the Court of Wards in Anno. 35. Eliz. was possessed of a Messuage and certaine Lands in Harrow in Com Mid for a tearme of yeares in Anno. 36. Eliz. he became Receiver generall and was bound in 20. Obligations of 200. l. a peece to make true account c. And after upon severall accounts he became indebted in great Summes of money to the Queene and being so indebted in consideration of 1100. l. did bargaine and sell the said Lease to James Pemberton which by meane conveyance came to Sir Gertard Fleetwood Question Whither this Lease c. was extendable and lyable to the Kings Debt c. and it was resolved that the said sale of the tearme was good against the King because the tearme was but a Chattell and the sale of Chattells after judgement Bona fide is good but not after Execution awarded And Cooke Chiefe Justice said that a Receiver or other accomptant which is indebted shall not be in worse case then a Fellon or a Traytor that may after Fellony or Treason and before conviction sell Bona fide for his
he lost his Common the Jury found that the Defendant did not put in the Beasts but they of themselves depastured there 1. The Jury have found the substance of the issue for the Plaintiffe the depasturing there and it is not materiall if he put them not there 2. This Action lyeth for the Commoner for he may distreine damage feasant and it may be that with strong hand he is hindered to distreine and so if he shall not have this Action he is remedilesse 2. A Commoner who had freehold in the common shall have an Assize Ergo a Copy-holder shall have this Action 3. The wrong ought to be so great that the Commoner loose his Common as a Master shall not have an Action for beating his Servant without losse of his Service and it appeareth not to the Court that there are more Commoners then he and if there be yet an Action lyeth because each had private damage and it is not like to a common Nusans which shall be punished onely in a Leete if there be not speciall damage but be the Trespasse never so little the Lord may have an Action of Trespasse The Lord Sanchars Case 10. Jacobi fol. 117. For procuring the Murther of John Turnor Mr. of Defence 1. REsolv That a Baron of Scotland shall be tried by Commons of England 2. The Indictment of the accessory in one County to a Fellony in another County by the Statute of 2. E. 6. c. 24. shall recite that the fellony was done in the other County for an Indictment is no direct affirmation of the fact 3. The Justices of the Kings Bench are within these words of the Statute Justices of Gaole-delivery or Oyer and Terminer for they are the supreame Judges of Gaole-delivery 4. The Lord Sanchar cannot be in the Terme-time Arraigned in Midd. before Justices of Oyer and Terminer because Justices of Oyer and Terminer shall not sit in the same County where the Kings Bench is but the principalls were Arraigned in L. in the Terme-time because this is another County 5. There needs not be 15. dayes for the returne of the Venire facias upon an Indictment in the same County where the Kings Bench is otherwise in another County 6. Because there is no direct proofe that the Lord S. commanded one of the principalls but that he associated himselfe to one who was commanded the best way is to arraigne him as accessory to him whom he commanded but if he be Indicted as accessory to two and found accessory to one of them this is good The word Appeale in the Statute of W. 1. c. 14. is to be intended generally Viz. By Indictment by Writ or Bill c. and attainders is to be intended upon any such accusation Ergo if upon any such accusation the principall be attainted erroneously the accessory may be arraigned because the attainder is good untill it be reversed but if the Accessory be Hanged and after the Attainder against the principall is reversed the Heire of the Accessory shall be restored to all which his Father lost either by entry or Action By 5. H. 4. cap. 10. none shall be imprisoned by Justices of Peace but in the Common Gaole whereby it appeares that Justices of Peace offend who commit Fellons to the Counters in L. and other Prisons which are not Common Gaoles Cases in the Court of Wards Anthony Lowes Case 7. Jacobi fol. 122. A. L. Tenant of 59. Acres parcell of the Mannor of A. by chivalry and Suite of Court to B. whereof A. was parcell and both A. and B. were parcell of the Duchie of L. out of the County Palatine holden formerly of the King in Chivalry in Capite and of another House there holden of A. by fealty and rent H. 8. grants the rent by release to him and confirmeth his estate in the said Lands by fealty onely and grants to him the Mannor of A. Tenendum by fealty and rent It was Objected that when the King grants the Seigniory to his Tenant the ancient Seigniory is extinct and a new one that is best for the King created Viz. Chivalry 2. When he extinguisheth services parcell of the Mannor of A. this shall be holden as the Mannor of A. is that is by Chivalry But resolved that the 59. acres and house shall be holden by fealty onely and as to the said Objection the release of the King doth not extinguish service which is inseparable to a Tenure that is fealty but all others are gone and true it is when the K. grants and expresseth no tenure it shall be by Chivalry but when the Land moveth from a Subject and the Tenure is changed the new Tenure shall be as neere the ancient as may be as Feoffee of Tenant in Frankalmoigne shall hold by fealty onely and here although they grant the services yet he limits the grantee to doe fealty A Knights fee is not to be taken according to the quantity but the value of the Land as 20. l. per annum and a Hide of Land is as much as a Plough can Plough in a yeare Reliefe is the fourth part of the annuall value that is of a Knight five pound of a Baron a 100. Markes of an Earle 100. l. of a Marques 200. Markes of a Duke 200. l. The Eldest Sonne of E. 3. called the black Prince was the first Duke in England and Robert Earle of Oxford in the Raigne of R. 2. was the first Marques and the Lord Beaumont was the first Viscount created by K. H. 6. Floyers Case 8. Jacobi fol. 125. BAron and Feme seized of Lands holden in Chivalry in right of the Feme in Fee levy a Fine to one who grants and renders to them and the heires of the Baron and levy another Fine to their use for life the remainder to their three Sons in taile one after another the remainder in fee to the heires of the Baron the K. shall have neither wardship of body nor Land 1. Resol That is out of the Statute of 32. H. 8. cap. 2. if he who had the fee dye c. in respect the estate by the first Fine did not continue and this although both the Conveyances are voluntary 2. The King shall not have wardship of the third part because it is not for advancement of the Wife for in the first Fine the Land moved from her and shee had no more by the second Fine then by the first 3. In regard the particuler estate is out of the Statute no wardship accrueth to the King by advancement of him in the remainder but if a revertioner upon an estate for life convey it to the use of his Wife this will give wardship of the body of the heire for he in revertion is tenant if a Lease for life be the remainder to two and to the heires of one he who hath the fee dyeth his heire shall not be in ward if the heire of one joyntenant who had the fee dye of full age living the tenant for
life his heire shall not be in ward although he be within age by that Statute because he is not immediate heire Sondayes Case 8. Jacobi fol. 127. M. S. deviseth to his Wife for life the remainder to W. S. and if he shall have issue that then his issue shall have it the remainder to S. the remainder to T. c. Totidem verbis upon condition that if any of them or this heires of their bodies goe about to alien that he in the next remainder to enter after the death of M. W. and S. T. suffereth a common recovery to his owne use in fee he in the next remainder enters 1. Resol Every one of the Sonnes hath an estate taile 1. These words if he dye without issue Male are sufficient to create an estate taile 2. The generall clause if any of his Sons or heires of his body doe it maketh it manifest 3. The condition proveth it for they cannot alien if they have but for life for this would be a forfeiture 2. The restraint of tenant in taile to suffer a common recovery is voyd See Mildmayes Case in the sixth Book Quicks Case 9. Jacobi fol. 129. THe King Lord I. N. and Tho. Q. mesnes of a Mannor which they hold in common in Capite and tenant of three Acres holden in Chivalry T. Q. maketh a feoffment of his moity to the use of himselfe for life the remainder to I. Q. his Son in taile the tenant infeoffeth I. Q. who infeoffeth T. Q. to defraud I. N. of the wardship of his Sonne within age and dyes I. N. seiseth the Son T. Q. dyeth the King shall not have wardship of the body and moity of the three Acres 1. Resol By the death of I. Q. it was a Chattell vested in I. N. and the King had but a possibility to have it if T. Q. dye during the minority of the ward which possibility shall not devest the wardship out of I. N. 2. When the tenant infeoffeth a stranger to defraud the Lord of wardship the Lord shall not have ravishment of ward before recovery of the Land in a right of ward and although the title of I. N. be but in action yet it shall not be devested by a descent after See the Statute of 34. H. 8. in Case of collusion Bewleys Case 9. Jacobi fol. 130. THe King Lord mesne by Socage and tenant the tenant is attainted of Treason the King grants to one tenendum by Chivalry and Rent and to doe his services to other Lords the tenant shall hold by Socage of the mesne and he by Socage of the King because the intent of the King was to revive the mesnalty which cannot be by any other way and the reviving of the ancient tenure shall be in construction preferred before the reservation of a new and the honour of the King shall be preferred before his profit and there was no default in the mesne Thomas Holts Case 9. Jacobi fol. 131. GRandfather tenant in Chivalry in Capite Father and Son the Grandfather conveyeth part of his Lands to the use of the Father and his Wife the remainder to the Son in taile c. the remainder to the right heires of the Grandfather and conveys other Lands to his younger Children for life with diverse remainders over and dyeth the Father tenders livery and before he sueth it dyeth 1. Resol By the death of the Father before livery sued and after tender the King loseth the primer seisin but not meane rates if any be due 2. The Son shall not pay primer seisin nor sue livery because the Father and not he was within the Statute of 32. H. 8. 3. If the King had had one primer seisin he shall not have another of the Lands conveyed to the younger Children but that ought to be an effectuall seisin Ergo here because the King had not the effect of the primer seisin of the Father he shall have primer seisin of the Lands conveyed to the younger Children as if hee had the grant of a prochein avoidance and presents and his Clerk dyeth before Induction he shall present again and before the Statute of Donis If tenant in taile the revertion to the King had aliened post prolem suscitatam with warranty which descends upon the King it is no barr without assets the effect of the warranty 4. The King shall not have primer seisin in regard of a secke revertion which descends to the Son otherwise if a rent be reserved the King may have that for a yeare So note for a fruitlesse revertion there shall be wardship but no primer seisin Matthew Menes Case 9. Jacobi fol. 133. TEnant of the King of a Messuage in Capite who holds other Gavelkinde Land deviseth all to his 4. Sons equally 1. Whether the King shall have a third part of the Messuage onely 2. Whether out of the part of the heire onely because Praerogativa Regis cap. 1. Rex habebit c. De quocunque tenuerint c. is intended if the Land descend to the same heire to whom the Land holden did discende 1. Resolved if no Will had beene made the King shall not have the Lands holden of others in socage but when by the Will to which he is inabled by the Statute he deviseth it to his Sonnes there the saving in 32. H. 8. giveth to the King ward and primer seisin So if Lands in chivalry devisable by custome are devised to the Feme although the devisee be good for all without aide of the Statute yet the King shall have a wardship of a third part 2. The King shall have his third part out of all their Estates equally Ascoughs Case 9. Jacobi fol. 134. THe King Lord Mesne in Capite and Tenant in socage the Mesne grants to the use of himselfe for life the remainder to the Tenant in taile if the remainder suspends the Mesnalty during the life of the Mesne Resolved that during his life the Mesnalty is not suspended 1. Not as to the Mesne because he remaineth Tenant to the Lord nor by reason of the remainder for the avoâ—ding of Fractions otherwise if the remainder be liimitted in fee for then he hath as high an estate in the Mesnalty as in the Tenancy and this can never be revived and otherwise a Seigniory in fee shall issue out of a Mesnalty for life and there will be Lord and Tenant in fee and Mesne for life but if the Lord Grant his Seigniory for yeares the remainder for life to the Tenant the Mesnalty is suspended A Mesnalty or Seigniory cannot be suspended in part and in esse for part by the Act of the party but they may by act of Law or of a third party As if the Lord take a Lease of part of the Tenancy all the Seigniory is suspended but if a Gardian indow the Feme the Seigniory is in esse for that part and suspended for the residue If two Coparceners are of a Seigniory and one commeth to the Tenancy by
defeasible Title the other shall distraine for the moity of the Seigniory and the Act of the Coparcener shall not prejudice her There are foure manner of Avowries 1. Upon his very Tenant 2. Upon his very Tenant by the manner where the Tenant had but a particular estate 3. Upon his Tenant by the manner when the Lord had but a particular estate 4 Upon the matter in the Land as within his fee but the Lord hath liberty to Avow according to the Common Law Thoroughgoods Case 9. Jacobi fol. 136. TEnant in fee infeoffeth one by Deed indented and delivereth it upon the Land in the name of seisin this is good and hath a double operation at one instant Viz. to deliver the Writing as a Deed and to deliver seisin of the Land according to the Deede 1. Resolved this is his Deed although he doth not say so but delivers it in the name of seisin for delivery is good without any words if one deliver a Deed to one as an escrow to be his Deed upon performance of conditions this is his Deed presently otherwise if he deliver it to a stranger so words are good without actuall delivery as if he saith take it like to a livery within view If the Obligee deliver the Obligation to the Obligor to redeliver the Obligor may retaine it for the words to redeliver are void 2. Delivery of the deede upon the Land amounteth not to livery and seisin but it doth if delivered in the name of seisin so of any other thing or if he saith I deliver you seisin without delivering any thing this is good also Beaumonts Case 10. Jacobi fol. 138. I. B. and E. his Wife Tenants in speciall Taile the remainder to the Heires of the Baron I. B. levies a Fine to K. E. 6. who grants to the Earle of H. in fee I. B. dyeth E. enters the Earle of H. confirmes her estate to have to her and the Heires of the body of I. B. E. dyeth seised having issue F. B. who accepts a fine Sur conusans de droit tantum with Proclamations and dyes having issue Sir H. and I. Sir H. in Ward to the K. after full age and before livery Covenanteth to stand seised to the use of himselfe and his heires Males of his body and dyes having issue onely a Daughter in Ward whether shee or I. B. shall have the Land c. 1. Resolved that E. had an estate taile and the Statute of 4. H. 7. c. 24. which inableth the Baron to barre the issue saveth the right of the Feme if shee enter or c. and one may have an estate taile which cannot discend as if the Sonne in the life of the Father levyeth a fine the Father remaineth Tenant in taile still although it cannot discend and E. here hath an estate taile so long as shee liveth or the Heires in taile remaine 2. The Confirmation is void for he who did confirme had but a possibility which passeth not by the confirmation and if he had a reversion in fee yet it should be void 1. Because the taile which the Feme had was confirmed which cannot descend 2. The confirmation doth not add a descendible quallity where he who should have it is disabled to receive by discent 3. This would in effect repeale 4. H. 7. 32. H. 8. two of the principall Pillars of the Law 4. 5. If Tenant in Dower grants her estate there is a discendible quality in the Heire to bring wast against Tenant in Dower and although the Heire confirme her estate for life and after shee assigneth it to I. S. who committeth wast yet the action of wast is maintainable against her Pari ratione in the Case at Barre in regard the confirmation doth not inlarge the estate of E. it cannot add unto it a discendible quallity 6. There are but three manner of Confirmations Viz. Perficiens Crescens aut diminuens and the Confirmation in this Case is none of them and if E. had no power to levy a fine or suffer recovery the reason is because she cannot barre that which was barred before by her Husband but this point was not now in Question The End of the Ninth Booke THE TENTH BOOK The Case of Suttons Hospitall Baxter Plaintiffe Sutton and Law Defendants in Trespasse in the Kings Bench and adjourned into the Exchequer Chamber and judgemet given against the Plaintiffe 1. Obj. BY the Parliament 7. Jacobi the Hospitall was Founded at H. in Essex Ergo the incorporation made after by the Kings Letters Patents is void and the Charterhouse is not given by the said Statute because S. purchased it after 2. Sutton who had License to Found an Hospitall before the Foundation dyed 3. The K. cannot name the House and Lands of S. to be an Hospitall because in Alieno solo 4. Every Corporation ought to have a place certaine but here the License is to found an Hospitall at or in the Charterhouse Ergo before that S. had made it certaine there was no incorporation also the place of Corporation ought to be certaine by Meates and Bounds and a place knowne will not serve 5. The King intended to make an incorporation presently which cannot be before that S. name a Master 6. Governors cannot be untill there be poore in the Hospitall Ergo S. calleth it in his Will his intended Hospitall 7. The Foundation cannot be without the words Fundo erigo c. and before such Foundation a Stranger cannot give Lands unto it 8. The Master was named at will where he ought to be for life and have freehold in the Lands also the Hospitall must be Founded before a Master be named 9. The bargaine and sale made by S. is void 1. Because the Money paid by the Governours in their private capacity shall not inure to them in their politick capacity 2. The Habendum is to them upon trust which cannot be in a Corporation 3. Because as before no Hospitall was Founded 10. The King cannot make Governours of a thing not in Esse To the first it was answered that the Letters Patents recite the preamble of the Act whereby and in many parts of the Act it appeareth that the incorporation was to be In futuro when it shall be erected and the Statute doth not give any Lands unto it but power to give without License of alienation and mortmaine and it appeareth by the Letters Patents that the erection precedes the License 2. The License is to him his Heires Executors c. at any time hereafter and the words of incorporation are in the present and so the incorporation precedeth the execution of this License 3. Although the King gave the name yet S. devised it and assented to it and the K. did it at his Suite 4. The K. makes an Hospitall of all the premises so that it is certaine and as to that which was said that a place uncertaine cannot be an Hospitall It was answered that a Mannor may be which is
prescribe In modo decimandi but not In non decimando And the reason is because he is not except in speciall Cases capable of Tythes at the common Law before the Statute of 32. H. 8. Cap. 7. And therefore without speciall matter shewing it shall not be intended that he hath any Lawfull discharge and in favour of the Holy Church although it may have a lawfull comencement the Law will not suffer this prescription In non decimando to put it to the Tryall of lay men which sooner will straine their conscience for their private benefit then render to the Church the duty which belongeth to it A spirituall person that was capable of Tythes at the common Law in pernancy may prescribe to be discharged of Tythes generally or to have a portion of Tythes in the Land of another Before the Counsell of Lateran every man might give his tythes to any spirituall person that he would and if the Lands of the Bishop were discharged in his hands absolutely by prescription the demising it to a lay man cannot make it chargeable and the Bishop might reserve the greater Rent And in discharge of Tythes the Judges of our Law doe know that the Ecclesiasticall Judges will not allow any such allegation and therefore a Traverse Absque hoc quod judices placitum c. recusarunt is insufficient for the refusall is not materiall for the party might have a prohibition before any plea pleaded by him but in some Cases the refusall is traversable as t was adjudgd in Morris and Eatons Case where t was pleaded that the plaintiffe did not read the Articles c. and that the Ecclesiasticall Judge refused this Plea But the truth is a man may prescribe that hee and all others whose estate he hath in the mannor of D. time out of remembrance have paid to the parson of C. for the time being one certaine pension yearly for the maintenance of Divine service there in contentation of all Tythes renewing or happening within the same Mannor and prescribe in respect of the pension payd c. to have all the Tythes within c. and this was adjudgd good in Banco Regis Mich. 39. Et. 40. El. Rotulo 199. And that a lay-person may sue for the Tythes c. For at the beginning it shall be intended that the Lord was seised of the whole Mannor before any tenancy was derived out of the same and then by composition or other lawfull meanes the Lord had all the Tythes within the Mannor for the said Pension paying to the parson and the Law intends it was for Divine service Et pro bono Ecclesiae the reason of whch intendment is the continuall usage time out of remembrance And upon such speciall matter a man might have Tythes as appurtenant to a Mannor for he prescribes in a Que estate in the Mannor and therefore cannot have them in grosse but t was adjudged Winscombs Case in a prohibition that a man cannot prescribe generally in him and all those c. to have Tythes appurtenant to a Mannor without speciall matter shewne because Tythes are due Jure divino The Arch-Bishop of Canterburies Case 38. Of the Queene fo 46. A Religious house in M. was given to E. 6. by the Statute of 1. E. 6. a Rectory which was impropriated to it was granted to the Arch-Bishop of Canturbury who leased to the Defendant and Land within M. parcell of the said Colledge came to the Lord Cobham and from him to the Plaintiffe who shewes that the Master of the Colledge was seised of the said Land and Rectorie Simul semel as well at the making of 31. H 8. as of 1. E. 6. Resolved that this Colledge came to the King by 1. E. 6. onely for when 31. H. 8. speakes of dissolution renouncing relinquishing forfeiture giving up which are inferior meanes by which c. or by any other meanes cannot be intended of an act of Parliament which is the highest manner of conveyance that can be and the makers would have placed this in the beginning if they had intended it Bishops are not included within 13 of the Queene which begins with Colledges Deanes and Chapters c. Also 1. E. 6. Enacts that all Colledges by this Parliament shall be in actuall possession of the King which last act being of as high nature as the first it cannot come to the King by 31. H. 8. and it was never pleaded that of Colledges which came by 1. E. 6. the King was seised Vigore of the Statute of 31. H. 8. Resolved that neither the Act nor the meaning of 31. H. 8. extends to other Colledges then to those which came to the King by 31. H. 8. for it should be absurd that a Branch of the act of 31. H. 8. should extend to a future Act of which the makers of 31. without a spirit of prophecy could not have foreknowledge and the Act of 31. concludes in as large manner as the late Abbots c. which late as it hath been agreed extends onely to those to be dissolved by 31. Resolved admitting that the Colledge had come to the King by 31. H. 8. that such a generall allegation of unity of possession of the Rectory and the Land with it was not sufficient for no unity shall be sufficient but lawfull and perpetuall unity of possession time out of minde as 't was adjudged in Knightly and Spencers case and that the generall allegation of the plaintiffe that the Master of the Colledge at the making of 1. E. 6. held the Land discharged is not good without shewing how either by prescription composition or other lawfull meanes as 't is adjudged in the Bishop of Winchesters case otherwise if the Land had come by 31. then by force of the said branch of discharge such generall allegation had been good Resolved that no Ecclesiasticall house except religious was within the Statute of 31. H. 8. Resolved that though 1. E. 6. saith that the King shall have the lands of Colledges in as ample and large manner as the said Priests c. enjoyed the same yet these generall words doe not discharge the land of any tythes for they doe not issue out of the land for a Prior had tythes against his own Feoffment of the Mannor and 't is no good cause of prohibition to alledge unity of possession in a Colledge which came to the King by 1. E. 6. as 't is upon 31. H. 8. in Abbyes c. For the Statute of 1. E. 6. hath no such clause of discharge of payment of tythes as 31. hath and therefore such perpetuall unity will not serve upon 1. E. 6. So 't was likewise resolved betwixt Greene and Buffkin Sir Hugh Cholmleys case 39. of the Queene fo 50. TEnant in Taile the remainder in taile the remainder bargaines and sells the Land and all his estate to J. S. to have for the life of Tenant in taile the remainder to the Queene c. upon condition that the
fine be reversed by nonage of the wife all the estate shall be restored to the wife presently for all the estate passed from her by the fine and so it was adjudged Banco regis in Worseleys case Resolved that though the variance of the limitation be onely in one estate and they agree in all the other yet all is voyd But if two joynt tenants or two having severall estates vary 't is good for every of their parts and shall be directed by their interests but if the variance had been in limitation of part of the land and they had agreed in the use it should be voyd for that part and good for the residue Note That though the husband might dispose of the land during coverture yet for the cause aforesaid his declaration was voyd If A. tenant for life and B. in reversion or remainder both levie a fine together generally the use shall be to A. for life the reversion or remainder to B. in fee for either of them grants that which lawfully he may grant and either of them shall have the use which the Law vesteth in them according to the estate which they would convey over Winningtons case 40. of the Queene fo 59. W. Infeoffed B. upon condition to regive to the Feoffor for life the remainder to J. Sonne and heire of the Feoffor the Feoffor enters and takes the profits without agreement or contradiction of the Feoffee and leases to D for 21. yeares and yet continues possession the Feoffee acknowledges a Statute to J. the Feoffor makes a feoffement to the use of himselfe for life the remainder to his second Sonne in taile c. and dyes the Feoffee enters and infeoffes the Sonne and heire upon which the second Sonne enters c. Resolved that though the intention was that the Feoffee should make an estate to him for his life when he hath entered without agreement of the Feoffee 't is a disseisin and the rather because as owner of the land he tooke upon him to make a Lease for yeares Resolved that by the Lease by Indenture he hath dispensed with the condition during the terme Resolved that when the Feoffor disseises the Feoffee upon condition and the Feoffee acknowledges a Statute c. This is no disability to cause the Feoffor to enter for the right of the Feoffee is not subject to the Statute but when the Feoffee in possession takes a wife grants a rent or acknowledges a Statute the land is presently subject c. And though upon entry he may be disabled yet till then he is not because the wife may dye or the Statute be released and then he may enter and performe the condition and the Feoffor by his feoffement hath extinct the condition so that the Feoffee may enter and when he hath infeoffed the eldest Sonne he hath done well Westcots Case in Communi Banco 41. El. fo 60. IF a man make an estate to three and to the heires of one of them one of them in this case hath Fee simple and yet the joynt estate continues for it is all one estate created at one time and therefore the Fee simple cannot drowne the joynture which taketh effect with creation of the remainder in fee but when three joyntenants are for life and after one of them purchase the Fee or else the Fee discends to him there the Fee simple doth drowne the estate for life for the estate for life was in esse before Note by this resolution if tenant for life grant his estate to him in the reversion and a stranger 't is a surrender for the moity and the benefit of survivor not regarded so the doubt in 7. H. 6. well resolved Resolved upon view of three presidents that judgement should be given for the plaintiffe upon a demise made by husband and wife without alledging it to be by Deed. Tookers Case 43. Eliz. fo 66. IOhn Arundell seised of Lands in Fee maketh a Lease thereof to A. and B. for their lives and after grants the reversion to C. for his life to which grant A. doth atturne being joynt tenant with B. and after A. by his Deed doth surrender to C. all his estate title and interest c. and then dyeth C. entereth claiming to hold in common with B. and whether his entree was lawfull or no was the question and judgement was given that it was lawfull for the attornement of the one tenant for life shall vest the entire reversion in the grantee because the estate of the joynt Lessees is entire and every joynt tenant is seised per my pro tout ' and by consequence the reversion which is dependent and expectant upon this estate is entire also and the atturnement of the one joyntenant is the atturnement of both Attournement is a lawfull act if one joyntenant assigne Dower 't is good Also the attornement passes no interest from him that attournes but perfects the grant of another And if one joyntenant give seisure of rent that shall binde the other but in a quid juris clamat or quem redditum reddit or per quae servitia one joyntenant shall not be permitted to attourne without his companion for doing of prejudice to his companion By Popham one joynt-tenant may prejudice another in the personalty but not in the realty if one take all the profits or release a personall action the other hath no remedy because of the privity and trust betweene them and the folly imputed to him to joyne with such a companion Note if a tenant have notice of the grant by a stranger and doe give his assent thereunto it is a good atturnement although it be in the absence of the grantee but disagreement ought to be to the party himselfe or doe atturne for any part it is good for the whole for the intent of an atturnement is but onely an assent to perfect the grant of another and he which atturnes cannot apportion divide or alter the grant Lord Cromwells case 40. of the Queene fo 70. BLunt bargained c. the Mannor of Alexton to which the Advowson of A. was appendant by Indenture to have as after in the same Indenture is mentioned and B. covenanted to suffer a common Recovery to the use of Andrewes and his heires rendring 42. pounds per annum to B. and his heires with a nomine poenae And further 't was covenanted and agreed as well for the assurance of the Mannor to A. as of the rent to B. that B. should levie a Fine c. to A. and his heires and A. by the same Fine should render a rent of 42. pounds per annum c Provided alwayes that A. by Deed should give the Advowson c. to B. during his life and if it did not become voyd during his life one turne to his executors c. And further 't was covenanted and agreed that all assurances afterwards to be made should be to the use of this Indenture c. after a recovery was
Deed to the Court the plaintiffe may pray it to be entred in haec verba the same Terme but not after Pagetts case 35. El. in communi banco fol. 76. IT was resolved that if tenant for life the remainder for life the remainder in fee if tenant for life maketh wast in trees and after he in remainder for life dye an action of wast is maintainable for the wast done in the life of him in remainder for life because it was to the disinheritance of him in remainder in fee. And now the impediment which was the meane estate for life is taken away Et remoto impedimento emergit actio It was resolved that when the trees are cut downe the property thereof belongeth to him in remainder in fee. And where it is said in some Bookes That he in remainder or reversion in fee shall not have an action of wast it is to be intended during the continuance of the meane remainder And in other Bookes is said in this case that an action of wast doth lie it is intended after the death of him in remainder for life Boothes case 36. Eliz. in communi Banco fol. 77. GEeorge Booth brought an action of wast against Skevington and declared that Sir William Booth demised for yeares to Ensor who assigned to Skevington The defendant pleaded an assignement to Elizabeth Cave before which assignement no wast was made the plaintiffe replyed and shewed the Statute 11. H. 6. ca. 5. and that the grant to Elizabeth Cave was made to the intent he should not know against whom to bring his action and averred that Skevington did take the profits the defendant rejoyned that Elizabeth Cave granted her estate to A. who demised to the defendant at will and traversed the fraud c. the plaintiffe demurred it was resolved that every assignee of every Lessee mediatly or immediatly is within the said act for the Statute was made to suppresse fraud and deceipt and therefore it should be taken most beneficially Secondly that he in remainder is within the said act as well as he in reversion Thirdly the intent of fraud aforesaid is not traversable but the taking of the profits which is a thing notorious whereof the Country may have knowledge In a formedon the tenant pleaded Non tenure the demandant said that he made a Feoffment to persons unknowne to defraud him of his tenancy and to keepe the profits the pernancy of the profits and not the Feoffment is traversable Samons case 36. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 77. THe plaintiffe and defendant referred all controversies to the Arbitrement of J. S. who did arbitrate that the defendant shall enter into an obligation to the plaintiffe that the plaintiffe and his wife shall injoy certeine lands which he had not done this is voyde for the incerteinty of what summe the obligation shall be for the award ought to be certeine like a Judgement Also the award was voyde as to the feme for she was a stranger to the submission Grayes case 37. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 78. Replevin THe plaintiffe intitles himselfe in barre to the avowry to Common c. which was traversed the Jury found that every c. time of minde have used to pay for the Common a henne and five egges the plaintiffe had Judgement for he needs not shew more then makes for him for this is not Modus Communiae paying so much nor parcell of the issue but a collaterall recompence to be paid for the Common for which the Terretenant had remedy but if the Terretenant had no remedy then the Commoner shall have the Common sub modo and may be disturbed by the Terretenant Fitz-Herberts case 37. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 79. THe father tenant for life the remainder to the sonne in taile leaseth for yeares to A. to the intent to barre the sonne A. infeoffeth J. S. to whom the father releaseth with warranty and dyeth this doth not barre the sonne for although that the disseisin which is made by the feoffment precedes the warranty yet because it was to that intent the Law will adjudge upon the intire act and so a warranty by disseisin 2. Although the disseisin was made to the father yet because he consented unto it the warranty commenceth by disseisin but if the father had made a feoffment in fee and dyed this shall binde the sonne if it be with warranty Foordes case 37. Eliz. Com' Banco fol. 81. A Prebend leaseth for 70. an Patron Deane and Chapter confirme dimissionem praedictam in forma praedicta fact ' for 51. yeares non ultra this is a confirmation for all the Terme for when they confirme dimissionem c. for 51. yeares it is repugnant but if they had recited the Lease and confirmed the land for 51. yeares this had been good for they have an authority coupled with an interest otherwise if onely a bare authority but by what words soever they confirme a lease for life or a gift in taile for part this is a confirmation of all because they are intire so if the estate of the disseisor or his lessee for life be confirmed for an houre yet all is confirmed Cases of Customes Snellings case 37. Eliz. Com' Banco fol. 82. S. Brings Debt upon an Obligation against an Administrator who pleads there is a custome in L. that an Administrator shall pay debts upon contract to a Citizen as well as upon Obligation and that J. S. upon a Contract had recovered and good 1. Resol Although that debt is given against an Administrator by the Statute of 31. E. 3. yet because they were charged as Executors before so that onely the name is changed the custome generally alledged is good 2. The ordinary by taking the goods was chargeable at the Common Law 3. This custome bindeth strangers The case of Markett overt 38. Eliz. fo 83. SHopps in L. are Marketts overt for things to be sold there by the trade of the owner therefore if plate be sold there in a Scriveners shop the property is not altered otherwise if in a Goldsmiths shop if he who passeth in the street may see it Nota the reason of this case extends to all Marketts overt in England Perimans case 41. Eliz. Com. Banco fol. 84. IT is a good Custome of a mannor that all sales of lands within that mannor be presented at the Court of the Mannor Obj. What remedy if the Steward will not accept the presentment Resp What remedy if the Clerke will not Inrolle a deede of bargaine and sale and therefore Caveat Emptor 2. Obj. That Interest is by the feoffment vested in the feoffee which shall not be devested by the Custome Resp That livery was ordained to give notice and a Custome which addeth more solemnity and notice is good Sir Henry Knivets case 38. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 85. TEnant for life the remainder in fee leaseth for yeares the Termor is ousted the disseisor leaseth for yeares his lessee sowes the land tenant for life dyes he
nor body were lyable to Execution in Debt or damages recovered but Execution was to be done by Fieri facias or Levari facias of his Goods and Chattells and profits growing upon his Land but in debt brought against one as heire his Land was liable to Execution because the Plaintiffe had no other remedy for the goods belong to the Executors but the body goods and Lands of the K. Debtor or accomptant were ever liable to Execution but such Levari facias or Fieri facias ought to have beene sued within the yeare or otherwise he was chased to his Writ of Debt and now by Westm 2. c. 45. he may have a Scire facias and by the 18º Chapter of that Statute an Elegiâ— is given of the moity of the Land which was the first Act that subjected Land to Execution for Debt or Recognizance and by the Statute of 13. E. 1. de Mercatoribus 27. E. 3. c. 9. 23. H. 8. c. 6. In Statute Merchant and Statute Staple all the Lands of the Conusor at the day of acknowledgement shall be extended into whose hands soever they shall after come But in all Actions Vi armis where a Capias lyeth in Processe there after judgement a capias ad satisfaciendum lyeth the K. shall have a Capias pro fine and in such cases the Law the preserver of peace subjecteth the body to Imprisonment and by Marlebridge c. 23. West 2. c. 11. a Capias was given in an accompt the proces before being a distresse infinite and by 25. E. 3. c. 17. the same proces given in Debt as in account for before this Act the body was not liable to Execution for Debt as aforesaid 2. If Land of the heire be seised in Execution upon a recognizance of his auncestor he shall not have contribution against a purchasor of his Auncestor although he come in without consideration and although the Heire be not charged as Heire but partly as Terretenant but one purchasor shall have contribution against another purchasor and one Heire against another Heire because they are in Aequali jure and therefore the Writ here which issued against the Heires without naming the purchasor is good although he be charged as Terretenant The Heire shall have an Audita quaerela as well as the Conusor himselfe before Execution sued and a Supersedeas but a Stranger shall not If diverse acknowledge a recognizance the charge doth not survive and the Land of one shall not be put in Execution but all their Lands equally so if two are bound to warranty both or their Heires and the survivor and the Heire of the other shall be jointly vouched and the Land of both shall be rendered in value But if Baron and Feme and the Heires of the Feme are bound to warranty and the Feme dye the Land of the Baron may be solely taken in Execution because there are no Moities betweene Baron and Feme So that when Land shall be charged by any Lien the charge ought to be equall but in a Lien personall otherwise it is as if two are bound in an Obligation there the charge shall survive But a Purchasor Bona fide before any Action brought shall not be subject to any charge And three Errors were moved in the record 1. The Scire facias was Haerediterrarum c. which is improper for he is not Heire to the Land but to his auncestor 2. The Writ is Scire facias haeredi terrarum c. and the Retorne is Scire fecit W. H. militi haeredi praedicti M. and every Retorne must answer the point of the Writ 3. The judgement is generall against Sir W. H. where it ought to be speciall for otherwise his owne Land shall be liable where by the Law the Land onely which came to him by his Father ought to be charged and he is charged as Terrtenant as aforesaid but these poynts were not resolved by the Court. Nota the new Writ of Error after entry of the first was not brought Quod coram vobis residet because the Record is not removed out of the keeping of him who had the custody thereof before A Perfect Table of the Principall matters contained in every Case in this Booke WHAT words doe make a generall warranty and to whom the custody of evidences doth belong Page 1 Tenant for life commeth in as Vouchee in a common recovery it is a forfeiture Page 1 2 23. H. 8. Extends not to suppresse good uses the conveyance good and the bad use void any man may give Lands to Charitable uses Page 2 Touching the Exposition of the Kings grants and how the words Ex speciali gratia mero motu c. therein shall be construed Page 3 A common Recovery by Tenant in taile binds them in remainder and reversion and all Leases and charges granted by them ib. A feoffement by Tenant for life destroyeth a contingent remainder Page 4 Conusee of Tenant for life and him in remainder in taile renders a rent to Tenant for life it is good during his life ib. Tenant for life and he in remainder in taile infeoffe I. S. it is no discontinuance or forfeiture otherwise if without deede Page 5 Perpetuities are against Law but the Parliament or Law may make an estate as to one and good to another Page 5 6 Tenant in taile suffers a recovery and dyes before Execution it may be sued against the issuâ— and when a man may enter or claime the Law will not put things in him till entry or claime Page 7 A man may be in by discent and yet not have his â—…ge ib. A future power of revocation may be released Page 8 When any thing Executory is created by consent of all it may be voided Page 8 A feoffement by feoffees devesteth all future uses contingent Page 9 27. H. 8. Transferreth the possession to uses onely In esse ib. When a remainder ought to vest ib. 27. H. 8. Of uses shall not be taken by equity ib. A diversity when Tenant for life infeoffeth the reversioner mediate and when imediate there it is no forfeiture ib. A disseissor may make admittances but not voluntary grants Page 11 A difference when a confirmation is made to one that is in upon an expresse condition and when not there the estate is absolute ib. Every fee simple may be charged one way or other Page 12 A difference betweene Terminus annorum Tempus annorum Page 13 A Termor grants to B. so many yeares as shall be behind Tempore mortis suae it is void otherwise if for a certeine number of yeares ib. A lease cannot comence upon a double contingency Page 14 He who hath a power of revocation may doe it part at one time and part at another time till he hath revoked all Page 15 By the same conveyance the old uses may be revoked and new raised Page 16 Vpon what conveyances uses may be raised upon a generall consideration Page 16 17 An Action of
lyeth against Executors for the Testators Debt Page 352 VVhere a man may wage his Law Page 353 VVhat words shall be adjudged a good consideration Page 354 VVhat Offices grantable for yeares and by what Acts Offices may be forfeited and where the King may seise without Scire facias Page 355 356 Copy-hold estates are within 4. H. 7. of fines Page 356 Disseissor of Copy-hold levyes a fine what time the Lord hath ib. VVho may enter without command to avoid a fine Page 356 357 A plea by an administratrix of fully administred must be certeine Page 358 VVhere an Allegation generally of Covin is good ib. A commoner Copy-holder may have an Action of the Case for the losse of his Common so he may distreine damage feasant ib. A Baron of Scotland shall be tried by Commons of England Page 359 See the diverse Resolutions of difficulties arising upon the Indictment of the Lord Sanchar and others Page 359 360 Cases in the Court of Wards The Kings release doth not extinguish a service inseparable Page 361 VVhen the Land moveth from a Subject and the Tenure is changed the new Tenure shall be as neere the ancient as may be ib. VVhere the particular estate is out of 32. H. 8. no wardship accrueth to the King by advancement of him in remainder otherwise of a reversion for he is Tenant Page 362 VVhat words are sufficient to create an estate taile Page 363 The Kings possibility shall not devest a VVardship vested Page 364 The reviving of an ancient Tenure preferred before the reservation of a new ib. By death of the father before livery sued after tender The King looseth primer seisin but no meane rates Page 365 Of a fruitlesse reversion a wardship but not primer seisin ib. Where the saving in 32. H. 8. giveth ward and primer seisin Page 366 A Mensnalty cannot be suspended in part and in esse for part by the act of the party but it may by Act of Law or a third person ib. There are foure manner of Avowries Page 367 What Act is a good delivery of a Deed or of seisin of Land ib. One may have an estate taile which cannot discend Page 368 Three manner of Confirmations Page 369 THE TENTH BOOKE WHat things requisite to the Founding of an Hospitall see at large Page 371 An estate taile barred by recovery in value without recompence Page 374 A Feme Covert shall not loose her Land by any conclusion without examination upon a Writ in Court ib. Tenant for life suffers a recovery and he in remainder in taile is vouched the reversion in fee is barred Page 375 The devise of a terme to one for life the remainder to another for life is good as an Executory devise Page 376 The first Devisee cannot barre him who hath the Executory devise ib. Assent to the first devise is an assent for all ib. Such an executory devise not grantable over ib. but it may be extinguished by release to the first Devisee ib. Qui destruit medium destruit finem Page 377 If a Recusant grant the next avoidance before conviction it is void by 3. Jacobi for he is disabled from the beginning of the Session c. Page 378 Covin shall not be presumed if it be not averred ib. A private Act shall be taken as it is Pleaded ib. What grants of Offices by a Bishop are void by 1. Eliz. except for twenty one yeares or three lives and what Circumstances requisite Page 380 Praerogativa Regis c. 15. excepts Knights fees and advowsons and indowments all other appendants now passe by grants and so doe they in Case of Restitution Page 381 A Corporation aggregate may make a surrender in Law not in Deed Page 382 The Jurisdiction of the Marshalsea and the reasons thereof Page 382 383 About 4. E. 3. the Court of Kings Bench became resident Page 383 A good diversity where the Court hath Jurisdiction but proceed In verso ordine and where they have not Jurisdiction there all they doe is Coram non judice and void Page 383 384 Diverse abstruse points resolved some at the common Law and severall upon the Statutes of 32. 34 H. 8. of wills Page 385 386 VVhat Colour is and where it must be given Page 388 VVhere a privy interest although he claime but part must shew the first Deed except he claim meerly by Law Page 388 389 VVhere a man may have a freehold discendible Page 390 A warranty barres no estate which is not displaced at the time of c. ib. A warranty cannot inlarge an estate where it may be given in evidence Page 391 VVhat Obligations made to Sheriffes are within the Statute of 23. H. 6. Page 391 Forma verbalis Forma legalis or Essentialis Page 392 393 The time of granting a Tales and when it is well granted Page 396 397 The proper place of a reservation is after limitation of the estate Page 397 Increase of services is betweene very Lord and very Tenant Page 398 VVhen Lands shall be said to be concealed from the K. 398 399 A man shall have costs in all cases where hee recover dammages Page 400 Where a man shall recover damages and costs also ib. Where to the writ of Inquiry and to the verdict and judgement ib. Where insufficient verdict may be supplyed by a writ of Inquiry and where it cannot a good difference Page 401 A difference between auncient Corporations and new in matter of Misnosmer Apices Juris non sunt Jura Page 401 402 Which is the legall time of payment of Rent Page 402 If payment be in the morning and the lessor dye at noone this is satisfactory against the heire but not against the King ib. Where the lessee shall hold rent free for a quarter Page 402 Where Damages may be assessed intirely and where not Page 403 404 What words passe under the name of Latine Page 404 Where by death of one of the Plaintiffes after summons and severance the writ abateth divers good diversities Page 404 405 A Qu. impedit praesentare ad medietatem Ecclesiae where good ib. Cases upon the Commissions of Sewers Where the Commissioners may subvert a Cawsey and where not Page 406 If a wall be subverted by a sodaine inundation the Commissioners may taxe all equally who have damage thereby ib. Otherwise if it come by neglect of him who ought to doe it ib. If the Commissioners have power to make a new River and a generall taxe so much upon every Towne for doing thereof Page 407 What is a good revocation of old uses and limitation of new Page 409 THE ELEVENTH BOOK A Difference between a disability absolute and temporary or personall Page 411 The grant of the office of Auditor to two is good Page 412 What offices grantable in reversion ib. Where the Jurors may assesse damages severally Page 413 Where one shall have an attaint that is a stranger to the issue ib. Where a writ of Enquiry shall issue Page 414 The plaintiffe shall have judgement de melioribus damnis ib. The conclusion of a plea is not traversable Page 415 In every issue there must be an affirmative and a negative ib. The Impropriation sufficient in the life of the Incumbent ib. VVhere the witnesses are not punishable for perjury Page 416 Perpetuall unity a discharge and what requisite thereunto ib. VVhat prescription for tithes of houses is good ib. A customary Mannor may be holden of another Mannor Page 417 VVhat variance in the name of a Corporation doth vitiate Page 418 VVhat devise of socage by tenant is Capite is good Page 419 An Ejectione firmae of tithes without shewing their kinds not good ib. If a deed be rased the obligor may plead Non est factum Page 420 A diversity where it is rased by the obligee himselfe and where by another ib. VVhere Clergy allowable at the Common law and where at this day copious and excellent matter Page 421 VVhere an Errour lyeth not before the finall Judgement Page 423 A fine by the Stewart of a Mannor where it is well assessed Page 425 VVhere the Lord may destreine for it without prescription ib. VVhere an action shall abate in part and where for the whole Page 426 Notwithstanding the exception trees remaine parcell of the Inheritance ib. A thing in possession cannot be parcell of a reversion upon an estate for life Page 427 None may be prohibited by the common law to use any trade Page 428 An ordinance by a Corporation against law is void ib. How an Ejectione firmae must be brought Page 429 Although the dammages are not well assessed yet the Plaintiffe may have judgement ib. Much variety of Learning touching Recusancy and upon the severall Statutes concerning them Page 429 430 Master and Fellowes of a Colledge restrained to grant by 13. Eliz. what statutes doe binde the King Page 432 Some grants to the King void and some voidable Page 433 VVhere acceptance of Rent doth barre and where not Page 434 Tenant in taile after possibility of c. hath a greater estate in quality then tenant for life not in quantity Page 434 435 VVhat priviledges belong to his estate Page 435 A lease without impeachment of wast what passeth thereby ib. A monopoly is against law and hath three incidents against the weale publique Page 436 What fees belong to the office of Master of the Ordnance Page 427 In the Kings Case the law maketh a privity to be accomptable ib. For what causes a Citizen may be disfranchised Page 438 The 3. Book fol. 9. Dowties Case A Difference where the first certainty is false in a grant and where the first is true and the second false Page 439 Where lands are in the Q. by 33. H. 8. c. 20. without seisure ib. Fol. 11. Sir William Harberts Case What remedy for debts at the common law and when the body and lands became liable thereunto Page 440 44â— In all actions vi et armis the body was subject unto Imprisonment and so for debt at the Kings suite Page 441 The heirs of the conâ—isâ—ser shall not have contribution against a purchasor ib. Changes reall doe not survive but personall doe Page 442 Three Errours there moved but not resolved ib. FINIS
206 Lord Cheneys case Cases of Usury fol. 208 Buttons case Claytons case fol. 208 Hoes case St. Johns case fol. 209 Williams case Case of Orphanes of London Wymarks case fol. 210 Cliftons case fol. 211 Pilkintons case Earl of Pembrooks case Pagets case fol. 212 Boothes case fol. 213 Samons case Grayes case Fitz Herberts case fol. 214 Fords case Case of of customs Snellings case fol. 215 Case of Market Overt Perimans case Sir Henery Knevits case fol. 216 Pennrins case Cases of Executions Blumfields case fol. 217 Garnons case fol. 218 Frosts case fol. 219 Hoes case fol. 220 Semaynes case fol. 221 Barwicks case fol. 223 Goodalls case Countesse of Northumberl case Buries case fol. 224 Flowers case Rookes case fol. 225 Penruddocks case fol. 226 Windsors case Hungats case fol. 227 Bakers case Boulstons case fol. 228 Aldens case Sir Henry Constables case fol. 229 Foxleyes case fol. 230 Malaries case Wades case fol. 232 Foliambs case Olands case Pynners case fol. 233 Edriches case fol. 234 Whelpdales case Longs case fol. 235 Saffins case De libellis Famosis fol. 236 Palmers case Caudreys case fol. 237 The Sixth Booke BReuertons case fol. 239 Markals case fol. 240 Sir John Molins case fol. 241 Wheelers case Ferrers case fol. 242 Spencers case fol. 243 Gentlemans case Morrices case Cases of Pardon fol. 244 Arundels case fol. 245 Treports case Edens case Colyers case fol. 246 Wildes case Sir Edward Cleers case fol. 247 Packmans case fol. 248 Gregories case Michelborns case fol. 249 Butler and Goodalls case Ambrosia Gorges case fol. 250 Marquesse of Winchester his case Reades case Helyars case fol. 251 Ruddocks case Sharps case fol. 252 The case of Souldiers Vicont Mountagues case fol. 353 Greenes case fol. 254 Boothies case Fitz Willams case fol. 255 Bishop of Baths case fol. 256 Dean and Chapter of Worcesters case fol. 257 Bellamyes case Henery Finches case fol. 257 Sir Anthony Mildmay Blakes case fol. 258 Higgins case Dowdales case fol. 259 Boswels case fol. 260 Countesse of Rutlands case fol. 261 Lord Chandows case Bredimans case fol. 262 Gatewards case fol. 263 Catesbies case fol. 264 Sir Moyle Finches case fol. 265 Lord Darcies case fol. 266 Burrels case Sir Drue Druries case fol. 267 Sir Gorge Cursons case fol. 268 Bullens case Lord Abergavennies case Sir Edward Phittons case fol. 269 The Seventh Booke CAlvins case fol. 271 Bulwers case fol. 273 Sir Miles Corbets case fol. 274 Gendils case fol. 275 Milbornes case Earle of Bedfords case Oghtreds case fol. 276 Englefields case fol. 277 Case of Swannes fol. 279 Sir Thomas Cecills case Lord Andersons case fol. 280 Butts case fol. 281 Cases of Quare Impedit Halls case fol. 282 Sir Hugh Portmans case Baskervills case fol. 283 Mauds case Discontinuance of processe by the death of the Queen fol. 284 Case of a Fine levied by the King fol. 285 Nevils case Penall Statutes fol. 286 Lillingtons case Bedels case fol. 287 Beresfoeds case Kenns case fol. 288 The Eighth Booke THe Princes case fol. 291 Calyes case Paynes case fol. 293 Barretry Greysleyes case fol. 294 Whittinghams case fol. 295 Jehu Webbs case fol. 296 Sims case fol. 297 Roger Earl of Rutlands case fol. 298 Beechers case fol. 299 Swaines case Sir William Fosters case fol. 300 Lovedayes case Crogates case fol. 301 Trollops case fol. 302 Whitlocks case Greenlyes case fol. 303 Lord Staffords case fol. 305 Wiat Weilds case fol. 306 Vinyors case Sir Richard Pexals case fol. 307 Buckmers case fol. 308 Frauncis case fol. 309 Foxes case fol. 310 Mannings case fol. 311 Baspoles case Sir Richard Lechfords case fol. 312 Talbots case fol. 313 Doctor Bonhams case fol. 314 Case of the City of London Case of Thetford Schoole fol. 316 Turnors case fol. 317 Shiplyes case Sir John Nedhams case fol. 318 Sir Francis Barringtons case fol. 319 Doctor Druries case fol. 320 Davenports case The Six Carpenters case fol. 321 Edwards Althams case fol. 323 Arthur Blackamores case fol. 324 Cases in the court of wards Myghts case fol. 326 Digbies case Earl of Cumberlands case Paris Stoughters case fol. 327 Toursons case Sir Gerard Fleetwods case fol. 328 Hales case Sir Henry Constables case fol. 329 Virgill Parkers case fol. 336 The Ninth Booke DOwmans case fol. 331 Anna Beddingfields case fol. 332 Case of Avowry fol. 333 The Abbot of Strata Marcella his case fol. 334 Bucknals case Henslowes case fol. 336 Earle of Shrewsburies case fol. 339 Hickmots case fol. 340 Batens case fol. 341 The Poulters case Aldreds case fol. 342 Lambs case fol. 343 Bradshawes case Mackallies case fol. 344 Peacocks case fol. 346 Doctor Husse case fol. 347 Combs case fol. 348 Petoes case fol. 349 Agnes Gores case Coneys case fol. 351 Pinchons case fol. 352 Banes case fol. 354 Sir George Reynels case fol. 355 Podgers case fol. 356 Treshams case fol. 357 Marys case fol. 358 Lord Sanchars case fol. 359 Cases in the Court of wards Lawes case fol. 360 Floyers case fol. 362 Sondayes case Quicks case fol. 363 Bewleys case Holts case fol. 364 Menes case fol. 365 Ascoughs case fol. 366 Thorogoods case fol. 367 Beaumonts case fol. 368 The Tenth Book THe case of Suttons Hospitall fol. 371 Portingtons case fol. 374 Lampets case fol. 375 Case of the Chancellor Masters Scholars of the University of Oxford fol. 378 Bishop of Salisburies case fol. 379 Whistlers Case Church-wardens Case of St. Saviours in Southwark fol. 381 The Case of the Marshalsea in false imprisonment fol. 382 Loveis Case in Ejectione ferme fol. 384 Doctar Leyfields Case fol. 387 Seymors Case fol. 389 Bewfages Case fol. 391 Denbawds Case in Error fol. 396 Lofields case in debt upon bond fol. 397 Legats Case fol. 398 Pilfolds Case fol. 399 Cheyneyes Case fol. 400 Case of the Major and Burgesse of Lin fol. 401 Cluns Case fol. 402 Osborns Case fol. 403 Read and Redmans case fol. 404 Richard Smiths Case fol. 405 Cases upon the Commissions of Sewers Case of Chester Mille Keighleys case fol. 406 The Case of the Isle of Elie fol. 407 Scroops Case fol. 409 The Eleventh Book THe Lord Delawares case fol. 411 Auditor Curles case fol. 412 Sir John Heydons case fol. 413 Priddle and Nappers case fol. 414 Doctor Grants Case fol. 416 Sir Henry Nevils case fol. 417 Doctor Ayrays Case fol. 417 Henry Harpurs case fol. 418 Henry Pigots case fol. 420 Alexand. Poulters case fol. 420 Metcalfes case fol. 423 Richard Godfreyes case fol. 425 Richard Lifords case fol. 426 The Taylors of Ipswich case fol. 428 Edward Savels case fol. 429 Benthams case fol. 429 Doctor Fosters case fol. 429 Magdalen Colledge case fol. 432 Lewis Bowles case fol. 34 The Case of Monopolies fol. 436 The Earle of Devonsh case fol. 437 James Bagges case fol. 438 THE FIRST BOOK The Lord Buckhursts Case 40. El. fo 1. IF a man for him and his heires do warrant Land to one and his heires this is a generall warrantie because there is not
Heires Males of his Body c. And if A. or his issue c. shall attempt c. to alien c. by which any estate shall be barred c. that after such attempt and before any act executed the use and Estate of him so attempting c. shall cease onely as to him so attempting in the same degree as if he were naturally dead and not otherwise and that then it shall be immediately to such persons to whom it should come by the intent of the Indenture c. C. dyes A. suffers a recovery B. enters c. adjudged he could not for this proviso is repugnant impossible and against Law for the death of Tenant in taile is not a cesser of the Estate taile but death without issue Males and by this reason the issue should have it in the life of the Father c. And for every discent c. Death naturall or civill is requisite and t is not materiall though Tenant in taile had no issue at the time of the breach for t was repugnant at the beginning and the estate taile doth not commence by the having of issue and a gift in taile upon condition that if the Donee dyes his estate shall cease is a void condition Also the proviso is void for the incertainty as a gift to two Et haeredibus is voide though a Warranty be made to them and their Heirs in Jermine Arscotts Case the like proviso was adjudg'd voide for be the proviso a condition or a limitation the intire estate ought to be defeated by it and an Estate in Land cannot cease for part and continue for the residue nor cease for one person and continue for another nor cease for a time and revive after The like judgement was betwixt Chomly and Humble but the Parliament or Law may make an estate voide as to one and good to another as Tenant in speciall taile levies a fine the issue is barred not the wife so a release by the demandant to the vouchee is good not by a stranger so if an Executor surrender a tearme to one respect t is extinct to another t is assetts c. And uses are within the Statute De donis though it speakes onely of Lands and Tenements and there shall be a Possessio fratris c. of them for they are guided by the Rules of the common Law Richill in the time of R. 2. and Thirning in the time of H. 4. Justices intended for to make a perpetuity but could not Shelleyes Case 23. Eliz Fol. 94. EDward Shelley leased for yeares and after Covenanted to suffer a recovery which should be to the use of himselfe and after to the use of A. for 24. yeares and after to the Heires Males of the body of the said E S. and the Heires Males of the said Heires Males c. E. S. dyes 9 of Octob. the first day of the Terme in the morning betwixt five and six a clock the recovery passes the same day and an Habere facias seisinam awarded the recovery was executed the 19 of Octob. 4 Decemb. the Wife of the Eldest Son before dead of E. S. was delivered of a Son named Henry Richard the second Son of E. S. entered and made a Lease c. Henry entred upon the Lessee who brought an Eject firmae and Judgement was given for the Defendant and t was resolved that if Tenant in taile suffer a common recovery and dye before execution that execution may be sued against the issue for the intended recompence in favour of the common assurance resolved that the revertion in judgement of Law is not in the recoveror before execution sued for the judgement is Quod recuperet seisinam which cannot be executed till entry or claime as 't is of a Common c. granted upon condition for when a man may enter or claime the Law will not put things in him till entry or claime The third and great point resolved was that the Uncle is in as by discent though he shall not have his age nor be in ward 1. Because the recovery being the Originall act had its Essence in the life of E. S. to which the execution hath retrospect 2. Because the use might have vested in E. S. if he were in life 3. Neither the recoverors by their entry nor the Sheriffe by making execution may make an Inheritance to whom they please 4. Because the Uncle claimed the use by the recovery and Indenture and by words of limitation not purchase Albanies Case 28. Eliz Fo. 111. A By Indenture infeoffed B. of two Acres to the use of A. for life the remainder in taile to C. the remainder in fee to D. with a proviso if E. dye without issue that A. at any time by indenture sealed c. in the presence of foure c. may alter c. any use c. A. of the one acre infeoffes F. and for the other Acre A. by Indenture renounces surrenders releases c. to B. C. and D. the said power condition authority c. E. dyes without issue A. by Indenture in presence of foure revokes the first uses and limits new resolved that by the feoffement the power to revoke as to limit new uses was extinct and by Wray chiefe Justice the future power may be released as a condition subsequent though the performance or breach cannot be done without an act precedent but as to this poynt the Court did not give their resolution but the whole Court agreed that if the power had beene present as t is usuall this might be extinct to any one who hath a free hold in possession reversion or remainder 'T was moved if the future power could not be released whether it might be defeated by the words of defeasance both being executory and 't was said that in all cases when any thing executory is created by a deed that the same thing by consent of all parties to the creation by their deed may be nullified as a warranty recognizance rents charge annuities covenant c. And of the same opinion was Wray chiefe Justice and the whole Court and judgement given according Chudleighs Case Or the Case of perpetuities Fo. 120. SIr Richard Chudleigh was seised in fee of the Mannor of D. and had issue foure Sonnes A. B. C. D. and 26º Aprill the third and fourth of Phillip and Mary infeoffed E. F c. in fee to the use of himselfe and his Heires of the body of G. then Wife of H. and after to the use of the performance of his Will for ten yeares immediately after his death and after to the use of the feoffes and their Heires during the life of A. the Eldest Sonne the remainder to the use of the first issue Male of the body of A. and the Heires of the body of the first issue Male and so to the second issue Male the remainder to the use of B. the second Sonne and the Heires of his body the remainder to C.
c. the remainder to D. c the remainder to the right Heires of himselfe Sir Richard Chudley died without issue of the body of G. 1º of the Queene the feoffees C. living by deed infeoffed A. in fee without consideration he having notice of the first uses A. hath issue a Sonne named S. and after I. and after infeoffes Sir I. C. with warranty S. died without issue c. I. enters c. agreed by all the Justices and Barons but two that the feoffement made by the feoffees which had an Estate for life devests all the estates and the future contingent uses also and though A. had notice of the first use 't is not materiall because the ancient uses were devested and this new estate cannot be Subject to the ancient uses which rose out of the ancient estate agreed that 27 H. 8. doth not extend to destroy uses otherwise then by execution and transferring the possession to them agreed by the most that 27. H. 8. doth not transferre the possession to any use but onely to uses In esse which doth appeare by the Statute for there ought to be a person In esse seised and also a use In esse for if there be onely a possibility of a use there cannot be an execution of the possession to the use the Statute sayes That the estate shall be out of the feoffees and that the estate shall be in such person which hath the use So that no Estate of the feoffees shall be transferred in abeyance and upon this t was concluded that contingent uses or in possibility may be destroyed or discontinued before that they come In esse as they might at common Law so the remainders limitted in use here shall follow the rule and reason of Estates executed in possession by the common law and if the estate for life here had beene determined by death before the birth of the Sonne the remainder in future should be voide though the Sonne were borne after for a remainder ought to vest during the particular estate or Eo instanti when it ends And t was holden by all that if the contingent use here had come In esse without alteration of the estate of the Land it should be executed by the Statute of 27. H. 8. Also it was holden by most that 27. H. 8. against the expresse Letter of it shall not be taken by equity because by preservation of contingent uses mischeives intended to be prevented shall be preserved and greater introduced Popham chiefe Justice said that by 27. H. 8. some uses in esse are executed presently uses in futuro agreeable to Law are executed if they come In esse in due time but uses not agreeable to Law are extirpated for the intention of the Statute was to restore the ancient common Law Five other points adjudged besides the principall matter 1. When Tenant for life the remainder being in taile to A. infeoffes the reversioner t is a forfeiture for it devests the estate in remainder so if there be Tenant in taile the remainder in taile ctc. and the diversity is when the privity and estate is sole and immediate when not 2. If A. hath issue B. and C. infants and a lease is made to A. for life the remainder to B. in taile the remainder to C. in taile A is diseised and releases to the disseisor with warranty and dyes this discends upon B. within age B. dyes the warranty discends upon C. within age C. comes to full age and three yeares after enters his entry is lawfull for he might enter in the life of his Ancestor and if he doth not enter yet the warranty shall not binde him otherwise it is when he is put to action and Caveat that after his full age he doth not suffer a discent before entry 3. If a disseisor c. who hath a defeasible title in a Mannor grant a voluntary estate by Coppy being forfeited or escheated to him this grant shall not binde him that hath right after a recontinuance of the Mannor but admittances which a disseisor c. makes to Coppy holds are good for they are in a manner judiciall acts and shall binde the disseisee 4. That an estate made to one and his Heires during the life of B. is but an Estate for life upon which a remainder may depend 5. That an Estate made to A. and his Heires of the body of Jane S. is an Estate taile against the opinion of Ascugh 20. H. 6. 36. Anne Maiowes Case 35. Eliz. fo 146. FEeoffor and Feoffee upon condition by Deed joyne in a grant of a rent charge to C. the condition is broken the Feeoffor reenters the grantee distraines the Feoffor brings a Replevin Resolved that the rent remaines to the objection that 't is the grant of the Feoffee and the confirmation onely of the Feoffor and a confirmation cannot make a conditionall estate absolute nor alter the quality of it except it inlarge it as if a Feoffor confirme the estate of the Feoffee upon condition before the condition broken it doth not make it absolute Answered and agreed by the Court that there is a diversity when the estate of him to whom the confirmation is made is upon an expresse condition there the confirmation doth not toll the condition but if such feoffee infeoffe another without condition there a confirmation to the second feoffee extincts the condition Feoffee upon condition grants a rent in fee the feoffor confirmes it to him and his heires and after enters for condition broken yet the rent remaines and by Littleton every fee simple land may be charged one way or other Concurrentibus his c. and the case 11. H. 7. is all one with our case and here 't is the stronger because the grant and confirmation were by the same Deed so that the rent was never subject to any condition The Rector of Chedingtons case 40. Eliz. fo 153. 2. E. 6. the Rector of Ched demised the Rectory to El Elderker for fourescore yeares if she should live so long and if she dyed within the said terme or aliened that then her estate should cease and then by the same Indenture demises the premises to R. E. for so many yeares as shall remaine unexpired after the death or alienation of El. for the residue of the terme of fourescore yeares if he shall live so long without alienation c. And if he dye or alien within the said terme then his estate shall cease and then by the same Indenture he grants the premisses to W. for so many yeares of the said terme of fourescore yeares as remaine if he lives without alienation and if W. dyes or aliens within the said terme that his estate shall cease and then he grants c. during so many of the fourescore yeares which shall be unexpired to T. his executors and assignes which Indenture and estate was confirmed by the Patron and Ordinary the Rector dyes T. dyes W. dyes and 17. Eliz. Ellerker
dyes after R. enters and dyes 18. Eliz. the executor of T. enters and assignes to J. S. the Successor of the Rector enters and Leases to B. who upon ouster brought an Ej. Firmae Resolved for the Plaintiffe and that the Lease to T. is voyd Argued for T. that his demise was good and a difference taken betwixt terminum annorum and tempus annorum as in this case of the demise to T. during so many yeares of the fourescore yeares c. not of the terme of fourescore yeares if a Lease be made for 21. yeares and after another Lease to commence from the end and expiration of the said terme of yeares and after the first Lease is surrendered the second terme shall commence presently not so if it were from the end of the said 21. yeares Resolved that the demises to R. and W. are voyd because the terme that El. had was sub modo if she should so long live which is determined by her death ergo no residue can remaine to R. and W. and so 't was adjudged between Greene and Edwards and the Court agreed the diversity betwixt the demises to R. and W. and the demise to T. 't was argued that the demise to T. was voyd 1. Because that the Lessor had not power for to contract for the land during the fourescore yeares for he had but a possibility to have the land againe during the fourescore yeares viz. if El. dyed which possibility cannot be demised but the Court delivered no opinion to this poynt 2. That the Lease to T. was voyd for the incertainty how many yeares should be behinde at the death of El. a termor grants to B. so many yeares as shall be behinde tempore mortis suae 't is voyd Locrofts case adjudged a man possessed of a terme of 90. yeares upon marriage of his Sonne demised the land to his Sonne for 70. yeares to commence after his death the Lessor dyes the lease was adjudged good because here he demised the land for 70. yeares which is certaine in which this differs from 7. E. 6. which diversity was agreed by the whole Court 3. That 't was voyd because he dyed in the life of El. so that the incertainty cannot be reduced to a certainty in his life time and so cannot rest in the executors a lease to one for so many yeares as his Executors shall name is voyd Note a diversity betwixt a covenant and agreement which is perfect and certaine though it takes effect in possession upon a future matter precedent and a covenant and agreement incertaine which is to be reduced to a certainty by matter ex post facto for in the first case the estate is bound presently in the other not which was agreed by the Court. 4. It was moved if T. had been in life the demise could not rest in him T. dyed before R. or W. and R. survived El. and by the expresse condition precedent R. could not take except El. dyed within the terme and W. could not take except R. dyed within the terme and this is as much as to say that if R. dyes before El. and T. cannot take except W. dye in the life of El. and R. survived El. So that both precedent contingencies faile viz. the death of R. and W. in the life of El. and though the demise to R. and W. are voyd yet the limitation precedent viz. the death of R. and W. in the life of El. to the demise to T. is not voyd for his interest may depend upon both the contingencies for so was the intention of the parties and this was affirmed by the whole Court by Popham Chiefe Justice The Lease to T. was voyd for another cause for it cannot commence upon a contingent which depends upon another contingent as here the demise to T. depends upon the contingent annexed to the demise made to W. and the demise to W. depends upon a contingency annexed to the demise to R. Digges Case 42. Eliz. fo 173. C. Digges was seised of the land in question and other lands in fee and by Indenture 6. Maij. 10. of the Queene covenanted in consideration of marriage betwixt him and his wife and for the advancement of T. their Sonne and for two hundred pounds paid to him before marriage that he and his heires would stand seised to the use of himselfe for life and after to T. in taile and after to the use of himselfe in taile with a proviso for the considerations aforesaid c. that it should be lawfull for him at any time during his life with consent of certaine persons by Indenture to be Inrolled in any of the Kings Courts to revoke any of the uses or estates and for to limit new uses 6. Maij. 12. of the Queene C. by consent c. by Indenture inrolled in the Chancery revoked the uses and estates aforesaid in part of the land and limitted the use of it to him and his heires after 20. Sept. 13. of the Queene by Indenture with consent c. inrolled in Banck M. 13. 14. of the Queene declared that for the payment of his debts that from the time of the inrollment of this Deed in Chancery all the uses in the first Indenture should be voyd and that the land should be to the use of himselfe in fee after C. 26. Octob. 14. of the Queene by Indenture covenanted for to levie a Fine of all his land part of which should be to the use of himselfe and his wife and his heires which Fine was levied the same terme after the Indenture dated 20. Sept. was inrolled in Chancery after C. enters and makes his claime and whether C. dyed seised in fee of the land mentioned in the Deed of Revocation of 20. Sept. was the question Adjudged 1. that C. D. might revoke part at one time part at another till he hath revoked all but he can revoke the same part but once except that he hath a new power c. to uses newly limitted for these words at any time amount to from time to time c. 2 That where the revocation is to be by Deed Indented to be inrolled this is as much as to say as by Deed Indented and inrolled and till inrollment no revocation shall be for otherwise perchance none shall be inrolled 3. That 't was no perfect revocation by the Indenture of 20. Sept. till the Deed were inrolled in the Chancery for though that the proviso of revocation in the first Indenture shall be satisfied with an inrollment in any of the Kings Courts yet for that the Indenture of revocation it selfe limits the revocation to take effect after the inrollment in Chancery it ought to be so 4. That the Fine levied before the inrollment in Chancery which was before the revocation hath extinct the power see Albaines case before adjudged and Popham Chiefe Justice said that without question such a power might be released for 't is not meerely collaterall but savours and tastes of
accordingly and if no request be made and the Feoffee or Grantee that ought to performe the condition dye the condition is broken Yet this generall rule admits an exception for here in case of an advowson he hath not time during his life though no request be made but upon contingency to wit if no avoydance fallin the meane time for if the Grantee stay till the avoydance fall Ipso facto the condition is broken for B. cannot have all the presentations during his life which was the effect of the grant and the Advowson is come into another plight then t was But where the day is certaine for the performance and the party dye before the condition is discharged because the performance is become impossible by the Act of God and therefore when a day certaine is appointed t is good that the Heire of the feoffee be named in the condition Another diversity was also agreed when t is to be performed to a stranger he ought to request the stranger in convenient time for to limit a time when it shall be done but if it be to the Feoffor himselfe he ought not to performe it before request Another diversity was taken by some when the feoffee dyes and when the feoffor dyes for in the one case the condition is broken in the other not Binghams Case 43. of the Queene fo 91. R. Bingham the Grandfather held the Mannor of B. M. of Sir Jo Horseley as of his Mannor of H. and levyed a fine to the use of him and his Wife for life and after of R. the Father his Sonne and Heire in taile and after to the right Heires of the Grand father R. the Father dyed the remainder in taile discended to R. his Sonne within age Sir I. H. suffered a recovery of the Mannor of H. to the use of himselfe and his Wife in taile and after to Sir R. H. his Sonne and Heire in taile after to the Heires of Sir I. Sir I. and his Wife dyed without issue Sir R. enters R. B. the Grandfather dyes by which the reversion in Fee discended to R. B. the Wife of Robert dyes R. within age enters and Leases c. Resolved that the use limitted to the right Heires of the Grandfather upon the fine is a reversion in the Grandfather expectant upon the taile not a Remainder so t was resolved in Fenwick and Mitfords Case and so t was resolved in the Earle of Bedfords Case Resolved that Sir R. H. shall not have the ward of the Land for the reversion in Fee is holden of him and not the Taile though both discend from the same Ancestor for the taile cannot be drowned and if Tenant in taile grant over the reversion he shall hold the Taile of his Grantee and though the Seigniory of the taile be suspended yet the Donee hath two distinct estates and the reversion is as a Mesne betwixt the Donee and the Lord and the Lord is not defeated for the Law gives no wardship in such cases and if it were admitted that by the unity of Tenure betwixt the Donee and reversion t was determined yet nothing shall be holden of the Lord but the reversion and in some cases the Donee in taile shall hold of no body as a gift in taile the remainder to the King Resolved if the Grandfather were Tenant for life the remainder to the Father in taile the remainder to the Father in fee the Father dyes his Heire within age and Sir I. H. grants the Seigniory to Sir R. H. and the Grandfather dyes that Sir R. H. shall not have the ward of the Heire because R. the Father did not hold of him nor any of his Ancestors the day of his death nor the Taile was not within the see and Seignory of Sir Ra. or any of his Ancestors at the death of R. the Father and the Writ saith Praecipe c. Eo quod terram illam de eo tenuit die quo obijt And though that during the life of Tenant for life the Heire of the remainder shall not be in ward because Tenant for life is Tenant to the Lord yet the death of Tenant for life is not the cause of ward but the removing of an impediment as in Paget and Caries Case Tenant for life commits wast and after Tenant for life in remainder dyes he in remainder in fee shall have wast T was said when two accidents are required to the consummation of a thing and the one happens in the time of one and the other in the time of another neither the one nor the other shall have benefit by it as the Tenant ceases for a yeare the Lord grants his seigniory and then the Tenant ceases for another yeare neither shall have a Cessavit which was agreed So Lacies Case Trin. 25. of the Queene who gave a mortall wound upon the sea of which the party dyed upon the Land yet he was discharged because the stroake was upon the Sea the death upon the Land so that neither the Admirall nor a Jury can inquire of it and t was said when diverse accidents are required to the consummation of a thing the Law more respects the Originall cause then any other A man presents to a Church in time of Warre notwithstanding the party be instituted and inducted Tempore pacis all is voyd So the Law more respects the death of him in the remainder the Originall cause of wardship then the death of Tenant for life which is but Causa sine qua non and rather a removing of an impediment then a cause so t was resolved that neyther the one nor the other shall have the ward Resolved that Sir Ra. should not have the third part of the Land by 32. 34. H. 8. for though R. the Grandfather had limitted the use to the Father which is within the Statute yet when R. the Father dyes in the life of the Grandfather the Statute extends no further for the Heire of the Father who is in by discent shall be in ward by the common Law not by the Statute and if the Statute should extend to the Son and Heire of him in remainder by the same reason it should extend to all the Heires of him in remainder In infinitum THE THIRD BOOK The Marques of Winchesters Case 25. of the Queene fo 1. LIonell Norris and Anne Mills were seised of the Mannor of M. and to the heires of the body of L. a common Recovery is had against L. without naming Anne H. Norris being in remainder in taile is executed for Treason and 't is enacted that he shall forfeit Mannors c. uses possessions offices rights conditions and all other hereditaments L. dyed without issue Anne dyed the Queene brought error against the Marques of Winchester heire of the survivor of the recoverors the error was that the originall Writt of entry wants the defendant pleaded that 14. of the Queene shee gave and restored to the Lord Norris Sonne and heire of H. Norris
and accepted the Rent by the hands of the assignee due after the assignement and before that this rent now demanded was due the Plaintiffe demurred and adjudged against him because the privity of the contract was determined by the death of the Lessee and therefore after the assignement made by the administrator Debt doth not lye for rent due after the assignement Also it was said that if a Lessee assigne over his terme the Lessor may charge the Lessee or his Assignee at his Election And if the Lessor accept the rent of the assignee he hath determined his Election and shall not have an action after against the Lessee for rent due after the assignement no more then a Lord having received the Rent of the Feoffee shall avow upon the Feoffor afterwards Butler and Bakers Case 33. and 34. of the Queene fo 25. W. B. and his Wife seised of the mannor of H. by an Estate made to them during coverture for the joynture of the Wife in taile holden In Capite and W. seised of Land in F. both which amount to a third part of all his Lands and also of the Mannor of T. In capite which amounts to two parts W. devises T. to his Wife upon condition that shee should take no former joynture and dyed the Wife in pays refused H. the question was whither the Will were good for the intire Mannor of T. or but for part by the Statutes of 32. and 34. H 8. Resolved that at common Law if a gift be to a Husband and Wife in taile c. the Husband dyes the Wife cannot devest the free hold by any verball Waiver or disagreement in pays as if she say before entry that shee will never agree to it shee may enter when shee pleases so if shee saith reciting her estate that shee assents c. to the said estate yet afterwards shee may waive it in a Court of record but if shee enters into the Land and takes the profits though shee saith nothing t is a good agreement in Law for the Law more respects acts without words then words without acts and a freehold shall not be so easily devested to the intent that the Tenant to the Praecipe should be the better knowne But as an act in Pays may amount to an agreement so it may amount to a disagreement but this is alwayes of one and the same thing if the Tenant by deed infeoffe the Lord and a stranger and maketh livery to the Lord if the Lord dissagree ' by word t is worth nothing and if he enters generally and takes the profits t is an agreement but if he distraines for his Seigniory t is a dissagreement yet in some cases a claime by words shall direct the entry to be an agreement to one Estate and a disagreement to another c. See the Booke at large but a man may devest the property of goods and Chattells or an obligation sealed to him by disagreement In pays Resolved that though the estate was created by way of use which use before the Statute might have beene waived in Pays yet now the Statute hath so incorporated the use and possession of the Land that it cannot be waived In pays more then an Estate created by feoffment c. yet t was here resolved That the refusall In pays to have H. and the entry and agreement to T. was a good agreement to the one and disagreement to the other And this by 27. H. 8. ca ' 10. If any Woman hath Lands c. assured after Marriage c. after the death of the Husband She may refuse her joynture and take her Dower c. And upon these words the Court agreed That a Woman might refuse her Joynture In pays and be indowed by consent or Writ The great doubt was if by this refusall of H. by operation of Law it doth discend immediatly to the Heire after the death of the Devisor for to satisfie the Statute which saith The King shall take for his third part such Mannors c. as shall discend c. immediatly after the death of the devisor Resolved First Upon the reason of the common Law the refusall shall not have such relation that the devise shall be good for the intire Mannor of T. for a relation is a fiction of Law to make a nullity of a thing Ab initio to one certaine intent which in truth had being and that Propter necessitatem ut res magis valeat quam pereat 11. E. 3. The Law will make a nullity Ab initio that the Wife shall have dower but not as to a collaterall intent as if the reversion were granted of the Lands which the Husband and Wife held in taile and the Wife for to have Dower dissagrees yet the grant is good for shee may be endowed though the grant stand and Relatio est fictio juris et intenta ad unum And though relations aide acts in Law as Dower yet t will never aide the acts of the party to avoyd them by relation as a man infeoffes an Infant or Feme covert and after gives c. or devises the Land or any thing out of it the Infant or Husband disagrees this shall have relation betwixt the parties that the Infant or Husband shall not be charged in damages but shall not make the voyd devise c. good A Lease for life the remainder to the King the King grants his remainder the deed is in-rolled it shall have relation to make this passe Ab initio to the King not to make the voyd pattent good And as relations extend onely to the same thing and the same intent so also to the same parties not for to prejudice a Stranger feoffement of a Mannor and a long time after livery the Tenants attourne this shall have relation to make the services passe Ab initio or otherwise they could never passe nor be parcell of the Mannor but not for to charge the Tenants for the arrerages in the meane time So here the refusall shall relate as to the mannor of H. onely not to T. and to the wife onely but not to prejudice the Heire upon whom part of the Mannor of T. discended to make the devise good for the third part which was voide at the time of the death For Omne testamentum morte consummatum est and as it was at the death so it shall remaine Resolved that after the Statute of 27. H. 8. and before the Statute of 32 H. 8. the Mannor of T. was not devisable and therefore when the devisor hath not pursued the Authority which the Acts of 32. 34. H. 8. gives t was voide for part The first branch he hath not pursued which saith That all c. having a sole estate in fee simple in any Mannors c. shall have full and free liberty c. to dispose by his last will in writing as much of c. as shall amount to the cleere yearely value of two parts in three to
be divided For he had not the Mannor of H. for his Wife had it joyntly with him See many excellent Cases in the Booke at large adjudged upon this word Having in the Statutes the Initium of a Will ought to be full and perfect which is the writing and therefore if the devisor command one to write his Will and he devises white Acre to A. and his Heires and black Acre to B. and his Heires and dyes before the devise to B. is written yet the devise to A. is good But if he devises to A. c. upon condition and he writes the devise and the Testator dyes before the Writing of the condition t is voyd for in the one case the devises are severall and the one is perfect in the other Case t is maimed and imperfect for the intire devise was not fully put in writing so t was resolved in the Case at Barre that neither the commencement nor the end of the Will was full or perfect for at the time of writing of it and at the death of the devisor he had no power in respect of the joynt estate in H. to dispose all the Mannor of T. which amounts to the value of two parts of all Also upon the first Branch he ought to have a sole estate and here his Wife is joyntly seised with him and shee cannot disagree during coverture The Statute gives liberty to him for to devise two parts by will but this is to be intended of such Land which he might convey by act executed but here by reason of the undivided estate of the Wife he cannot dispose it but during coverture Also the third part of cleere yearly value is saved to the King and the intent of the Statute was that the King shall have the equall benefit at least for his third part as the devisee hath for two parts but here the devisee had two parts absolutely and the King but a possibility Viz. If the Wife would disagree which is at her pleasure and this Statute hath been constru'd that equality should be observed A man which held three Mannors of three Lords could not devise two of them but two parts of every one upon these words Cleere yearly value 't was said that of Inheritances which are not of any yearly value some are devisable some not as Bona et catalla felonum fugit or utlagat Fines amerciaments within such a Mannor or Towne these cannot be devised nor left to discend but a Leete Waife or Stray or other hereditament appendant or appurtenant to a Mannor passe by devise of the Mannor with th' appurtenances as incidents and the Statute had no intent for to dismember these things which by lawfull prescription had beene united But if a hundred with goods of Fellons Outlaws Fines Amerciaments returne of Writts and such other casuall hereditaments within the same hundred have beene accustomably demised for a yearely rent they may be devised within the purview of the said Act. 'T was said upon the words of the Statute which says that he may devise a rent common c. Out of two parts that a devise of a rent of the full value out of all is voyd but out of two parts 't is good And 't was observed that upon 32. H. 8. a devile of all his land had beene good for two parts as adjudged in Vntons Case for Land is severable but a rent is a thing intire and 34. H. 8. onely gives authority for to devise it The second branch which speakes of division cannot be satisfied for during his life he himselfe could not Set it out and after his death it survives to the Wife The third and fourth branch is not satisfied in this word immediatly for till disagreement without question the Mannor of H. survived to the Wife and if an Office had beene found before disagreement without doubt the Queene should have a third part of the Mannor of T. and the devise being voyd at the death of the devisor the third part lawfully vested in the Heire by discent it cannot be made good and devested by a subsequent disagreement Littleton discent to the Heire of Tenant by the courtesy of a disseissoresse doth not take away entry for the Heire comes not in immediatly 't was agreed if a man devises two acres holden by Knights service and a reversion upon a Lease for life discends to the heire this is no immediate discent within the Statute but the third part of the two ought to discend see many excellent Cases of devises adjudged upon the Statute Another good Case of relations Jennings and Braggs Case a disseisee makes an Indenture purporting a Lease for yeares and delivers it to a stranger out of the Land as an Escroule and commands him for to enter and deliver this as his deed to the Lessee who doth it and adjudged a good Lease and this diversity agreed First When the person at the first delivery hath not ability to make the contract and before the second delivery hath 't is voyd as an Infant and a Fème covert otherwise when at first delivery the person hath ability but cannot perfect it till an impediment removed which is done before the second delivery there 't is good as at Barre Resolved secondly that to some intent the second delivery shall have relation to the former by fiction of Law Vt res magis valeat quam pereat as if a Feme sole deliver a Lease as an escroule and after takes Husband or dyes yet by the second delivery 't is a good deed Ab initio and to some intent Vt res magis valeat c. it shall not relate yet in truth the second delivery hath all its force by the first and is but an execution and consummation of the former as at Barre for if it should relate to the first delivery then it would avoyd the lease for it should be made by one who was out of possession fictio legis inique operatur alicui damnum vel injuriam Thirdly 't was resolved that as to collaterall acts that there shall be no relation Omninò as if the Obligee release before the second delivery such release is voyd Ratcliffes case 34. of the Queene fo 37. A. Feme sole devises Socage land to the sonne of her daughter in taile the remainder to two Sisters of the devisee and to the heires of their two bodies by equall portions to be divided the remainder in fee to the Mother of the daughters and dyes the sonne dyes without issue Martha one of the daughters dwelling in her Mothers house daughter of the devisor within the age of 16. and above 14. departed at the second houre in the night with the consent of the husband of her Mother in whose house she was 8. miles and there married E. R. the issue was whether E.R. the Mother had the custody of the said M. at the time of the contract and marriage aforesaid for if she had then the
land of M. was lost by the Statute of 4. and 5. P. and M. ca ' 8. Resolved that there were two manners of custodies or Gardianships the one by the common law the other by the Statute at common Law foure manner of Gardians viz Gardian in Chivalry Socage Nature by Nurture The first two are fully described in our Bookes but great controversie was at barre for Gardian by Nature Some held that the Father onely shall have the custody of his sonne and heire apparent within age not the Mother Grandfather c. Also that the Father shall not have the custody of his daughter and heire for it ought to be such an heire as shall continue sole and apparent heire as the Father shall not have the custody of the youngest sonne in Borough English for tenure in Chivalry Others affirme that not onely the Father but every auncestor male or female shall have the custody of his heire apparent male or female Trespas quare 〈◊〉 consanguinium haeredem of the plaintiffe cujus maritagium ad ipsum pertinet c. rapuit c. lyes The Mother though she had no land brought ravishment of ward of J. her Sonne and heire against the grandfather who had land that might descend By the Court both erre for 't is true that every auncestor shall have trespas or ravishment of ward against a stranger for his heire male or female and the Writ shall say Cujus maritagium ad ipsum pertinet and good reason for the establishment of his house consists upon providing of a convenient marriage for his heire apparant and it matters not of what age such heire is but such action lyes not against gardian in chivalry by any of his auncestors but the Father So the Court resolved here the Mother could not be gardian in Socage if the land had descended to the daughter nor by nurture because she was above 14. but the common Law gives remedy against a Stranger as aforesaid Resolved here the Mother shall have the custody within the provision of the Act which hath ordained two new manners of custodies 1. By reason of nature 2. By assignation the first the Father after his death the Mother the second by assignation of the Father by his will or any act in his life See the Booke at large for the exposition of this Statute Resolved that the assent of the husband was not materiall for the Statute hath annexed the custody to the person of the Mother jure naturae which is inseperable and by marriage cannot be transferred to the husband the Father shall not forfeit the wardship by outlawry nor shall his Executors have it Resolved though she departed out of the house sixe houres before the contract yet in judgement of Law the Mother had the custody at the time of the contract for 't is inseperably annexed to the person of the Mother Resolved that by this devise the two daughters wete tenants in common in taile by these words equally to be divided though they never make partition in facto and so it hath been often adjudged Resolved that the husband and wife damsell had good title upon this verdict against the other daughter for by these words to the next of kin to whom the inheritance should c. come after her decease during the life of such person who shall so contract c. it seemes the daughter shall not have the forfeiture for though she be of the blood yet if M. dye her issue shall have the land if without issue the Mother in the remainder To the objection that the Mother cannot have it for she is not of the blood of the daughter but econtra Father or Mother are not next to whom administration shall be granted and land shall escheate rather then it shall goe to Father or Mother Resolved often against 5. E. 6. that the Father or Mother are next to whom administration may be granted and Littleton says that the Father is neerer of blood then the Uncle and therefore the Father shall have a remainder limitted to the next of blood of the Sonne but he shall not have an inheritance by discent from the Sonne for a Maxime prohibits it And 't was said at barre if he in reversion had been brother of the halfe blood he might have entered as Proximus de sanguine yet none of the halfe blood could inherit See the Booke at large where is excellent learning of discents as also the learning of Possessio fratris c. Resolved by the Court that it doth not come in question who shall enter for the forfeiture by the Statute for the issue was joyned upon a collaterall point whether the Mother had the custody at the time of the contract and the finding of the Jury is not materiall and therefore though the Plaintiffe who was lessee of the husband of the damsell as appeared had good title against the defendant being lessee of the husband of the other Sister yet because the issue was found against him judgement was given Quod nihil capiat c. Boytons case 35. Eliz. in Banco regis fo 43. A Writ of cap ad satisfaciendum is retornable at Westminster die Lunae prox post Crastin Animarū the partie is arrested the Sheriffe is not bound to bring the prisoner in recta Linea from the place where he was arrested or from the Countie But if he have the prisoner in Court at the day of the returne being never out of his custody in the meane season it is good But if a Sheriffe or a Bayliffe assent that one who is in execution and under their custody to goe out of the Gaole for a time and then to returne yet although he returne at the time it is an escape And so it is likewise if a Sheriffe suffer him to goe with a Bayliffe or a Keeper for the Sheriffe ought to have him in arcta custodia the Statute of Westminster 2. cap. 11. says Quod carceri manucipentur in ferris So as the Sheriffe may keepe him in yron and fetters to the intent that they may sooner satisfie their Creditors The Sheriffe upon a Habeas corpus for one in execution may bring the partie what way he will so as he have his bodie at the day according to the Writ If one in execution escape out of the Gaole and fly into another Countie the Sheriffe upon fresh suite taketh him again before any action brought against the Sheriffe the Judges have adjudged this no escape and if one in execution escape de son tort and be taken againe he shall never have an audita querela because a man shall not take advantage of his own wrong Sir George Brownes case 36. of the Queene fo 50. ISsue in speciall taile the remainder to himselfe in fee in the life of his Mother tenant in speciall taile levies a Fine in truth with Proclamations though they were not found to Sir G. B. the Mother living the Sonne leased for three lives
former acts of limitation as W. 1. ca ' 38. W. 2. ca ' 2. doe not exclude a seisin sufficient at common Law And the Statute saith Actuall possession or seisin which Seisin is eyther actuall or in Law Resolved that the act doth not extend to such a rent or service which by common possibility cannot happen within sixty yeares as homage fealty for the tenant may live beyond or to cover the Hall or to goe in Warre so of a Formedon in Discender for tenant in taile may live sixty yeares after discontinuance and though In facto he dyes and the issue doth not pursue his Formedon yet he may have it at any time and the seisin of the donee was not traversable so of homage and other casuall services though the Lord might have had seisin So if the Lord release to the tenant so long as I. S. hath heires of his body though sixty yeares passe yet he may distraine for Impotentia excusat legem and there may be a tenure by homage c. and yet never done as if the Land be conveyed to a Maior c. or other Corporation aggregate of many they hold by fealty yet they cannot doe it A Writ of Escheate Cessavit Rescous are not within the Act for in them the seisin is not traversable but the tenure and in the Escheate and Cessavit they demand the Land and can lay no seisin and the Act extends onely to those Writs where the demandant or his Ancestors might have had seisin So Note Land shall escheate though there be no seisin of the services within the time of limitation for the Seigniory remaines though seisin wants so if the tenant cesse and the Land be not overt and sufficient to his distresse the Lord shall have a Cessavit though he wants seisin of the services Resolved if nothing be arreare and the Lord distraines the tenant may make rescous or if he be so often distrained that he cannot manure his Land he may have an Assise De souent distres but for such tortious distresse where nothing is arreare the tenant shall not have Trespasse Vi armis against the Lord for this is prohibited by the Statute of Marleb ca ' 3. See the Booke at large in what case an incroachment of more rent by the Lord then he ought to have shall be avoyded in what not Resolved that though a man hath beene out of possession of Land by sixty yeares yet if his entry be not taken away he may enter and bring any possessory action of his owne possession for the first clause doth not barre any right but prohibits that none shall have a Writ of right c. of the possession of his ancestors c. but onely of a seisin within sixty yeares the first and second clause extend onely to seisin auncestrell the third to an action of his owne possession not to entry the fourth to avowry the fifth to a Formedon c. Note Reader out of this that when the tenant hath done homage and fealty which the Lord may inforce him to doe this shall be a seisin of all other services as to avowry though the Lord nor those by whom he claimes had seisin within sixty yeares Actions of Slaunder The Lord Cromwells Case 20º of the Queene fo 12. THe Lord Cromwell brought an Action De Scandalis magnatum against D. Viccar Tam pro domina regina quam pro seipso upon the Statute of 2. R. 2. ca ' 5. The Defendant said to the Plaintiffe It is no marvell though you like not of me for you like of those that maintaine sedition against the Queenes proceedings the Defendant justifies specially that he being Viccar of N. the Plaintiffe procured I. T. and I. H. for to preach there who in their Sermons inveyed against the Booke of common prayer and affirmed it to be superstitious upon which the Viccar inhibited them for they had not license nor authority to preach yet they proceeded by the incouragement of the Plaintiffe the Plaintiffe said to the Defendant Thou art a false Varlet I like not of thee to whom the Defendant said It is no marvaile though you like not of me for you like of those innuendo the aforesaid I. T. and I. H. that maintaine sedition Innuendo seditiosam illam doctrinam against the Queenes proceedings Resolved in this case that the Statute aforesaid concerning the King the Judges Ex officio ought to take notice of it as they ought of all Statutes that concerne him Resolved that the justification is good for in case of slaunder the sence of the words is to be taken which may appeare by the occasion of speech Sensus verborum ex causa dicendi accipiendus est et sermones semper accipiendi sunt secundum subjectam materiam And here the sence of the words appeares and his meaning in speaking them and that he did not intend any publique or violent sedition as the word of it selfe imports and God defend that the words of one by a strict and grammaticall construction should be taken contrary to the manifest intent as in an Action for calling the Plaintiffe murderer 't is a good justification that the Plaintiffe confessing that he had killed diverse Haires with Engines the Defendant said Thou art a Murderer and the Defendant shall not be put to a generall issue when he confesses the words and shewes that they are not actionable as in maintainance the Defendant may justifie lawfull mainteinance whereupon the Plaintiffe replyed that the Defendant dixit c. Verba praedict de iniuria sua propria absque tali causa upon this they were at issue and after agreed Cutler and Dixons Case 27. and 28. of the Queene fo 14. IF one exhibite certaine Articles to a Justice of peace against one declaring divers great abuses and misdemeanours c. to the intent to bind him to the good behaviour In this case the party accused shall not have any action upon the case for it is in pursuite of ordinary justice and if such actions were permitted none would complayne for feare of infinite vexation Sir Richard Buckley and Woods Case 33. and 34. of the Queene fo 14. WOod exhibited a Bill in the Starrechamber against Sir R. B. and charged him with divers matters examinable there and with other matters not determinable there as that he was a maintainer of Pyrates and Murtherers and a procurer of Pyracies upon which Sir R. B. brought this action c. Resolved that no action lyes for matter examinable there though 't was meerely false because that 't was in course of justice Resolved that an action lyes for these words not examinable there for 't is not done in course of Justice and great inconvenience would follow if matters may be inserted in Bills exhibited in so high and honourable a Court in Slaunder of the parties and they cannot answer there for their purgation nor have their action for purging themselves of the crimes and recover damages for
binde the lessor otherwise of admittances upon surrenders or descents for he was tenant at sufferance who hath no lawfull interest and a Writ of entry ad terminum qui praeteriit lyes against him and so he is a deforceor Murrell and Smiths case 33. and 34. of the Queene fo 24. THe Queene grants a Copyhold in fee and after grants the inheritance of the Copyhold to a stranger the Copyholder devises to M. and after surrenders to the use of his will Resolved that custome hath so established the estate of a Copyholder that by severance of the inheritance of the Copyhold from the Mannor the Copyhold is not destroyed for being the Lord himselfe could not ouste the Copiholder no more can another claiming in by him Objected that every Copyhold ought to be parcell of the Mannor and to be demised or demisable time out of memory Resolved that because once this had both the incidents aforesaid and its perfection the severance made by the Lord shall not destroy it Resolved that notwithstanding the surrender and devise the Copyhold descended to the heire for after the severance of the inheritance from the Mannor the surrender was utterly voyd for the land was not parcell of the Mannor at the time and the devise onely cannot transferre such a customary estate but it ought to be by surrender into the hands of the Lord c. Resolved that after severance the Copyholder shall pay his rent to the Feoffee and shall pay and do other services which are due without admittance or holding of a Court as to plough the demeanes of the Lord Heriot c. but suite of Court and Fine upon alienation or admittance are gone for now the land cannot be aliened for though the Copyholder hath some benefit by the severance as appeares before so he hath great prejudice for now he cannot surrender or alien his estate nor the Feoffee cannot make an admittance for he is not dominus pro tempore Resolved that such forfeitures remaine as were before the severance as Feoffement lease wast denier of rent So if the land were of the nature of Borough English or Gavelkind and other customes which run with the land remaine And 't was said that such Copyholder hath no other meanes to alien but by Decree in Chancery against him and his heires but by this the interest of the land is not bound but the person onely Kite and Queintons case 31. of the Queene fo 25. COpyholder in fee surrenders out of Court by the custome to the hands of certaine Copyhold tenants to the use of another and his heires upon certaine condition at the next Court the surrender was presented but the condition omitted he to whose use c. dyes the Lord admits his heire he that made the surrender releases to the heire being in possession and after enters Resolved that the presentment of the surrender was voyde for that the condition was omitted for the surrender that the Copiholder made was not presented but if the surrender the condition had been presented and the Steward in entring of it omits the condition upon sufficient proofe of it the surrender shall not be avoyded but the roll amended for the roll doth not conclude the party for to plead or give in evidence the truth of the matter Resolved if a Copyholder be ousted by wrong a release by him to the disseisor doth not transferre his right because he hath not any customary estate upon which the release of the customary right may inure and this should be prejudiciall to the Lord for by this he shall lose his Fine and services but a release made to him which is admitted by the Lord and in possession is good and a release of a customary right may inure to him and the Lord not prejudiced and the release shall inure by way of extinguishment And Littleton speaks of an alienation by surrender onely which ought to be into the hands of the Lord but a release cannot be done to the Lord and Littleton says He which claimes a Copihold by surrender hath no other evidence but he which claimes an extinguishment of a right may have it by release by Deed and 't is no perill to purchasors for if the Copiholder in possession sels it he will shew the release and he which is out of possession cannot sell till he hath regained the possession caveat emptor By Wray if he which hath a pretensed title c. to a Copihold bargaines c. this is within 32. H. 8. for the Statute says any right or title and great part of the land within the Realme is in Copy and therefore the intention was to include them to avoyde maintenance and champerty Melwich and Luters case 30. of the Queene fo 26. REsolved that the lessee of a copiholder for a yeare shall maintaine an Ej ' Firmae for his terme being warranted by Law by force of the generall custome of the Realme 't is reason that he should have remedy by Ej ' Firmae And this is a speedy course against a Stranger Resolved that the Copiholds are not destroyed by severance of the inheritance of them from the Mannor but remaine in force So Murrels case before adjudged Resolved that when the Lord of a Mannor having many ancient Copiholds in a Towne grants the inheritance of all the Copiholds the grantee may hold a Court for the customary tenants and accept surrenders and make admittances and grants for every Mannor which consists of Freeholders and Copiholders comprehends in effect two severall Courts the one the Court Baron for Freeholders and in this the Suitors viz. the Freeholders are Judges and the other Court for the Copiholders and in this the Steward or the Lord himselfe is Judge and though this is not a Mannor in Law because it wants Freeholders yet the grantee may hold such Court as aforesaid for Copiholders onely as the grantor himselfe might So if all the Freeholds escheate or the Lord releases the tenure and services yet he may hold a customary Court for the Copiholds Note Reader though the Lord by his own act cannot make of one and the same Mannor at common Law divers severall Mannors consisting of Demeanes and Freeholders yet he may make a customary Mannor of Copiholders Resolved that the Lord himselfe may make a grant or admittance of a Copiholder out of the Mannor at what place he pleases but if the Steward at any Court holden out of the Mannor shall make grants or admittances they are voyd Neales case 37. of the Queene fo 26. ADjudged that where the Lord of a Mannor demises all his lands granted by Copy for two thousand yeares that the lessee may hold Courts for Copiholders as Melwiches case is before and 't was said so to be resolved in C. Hattons case Note Reader a good diversity where the number of the Copiholders may support the custome and a singular case of a Copiholder as in Murrels case before in which case the
construed shall or might be leavyed and so 't was holden of a Lease or limittation of a use otherwise he which is to leavy the Summe by deferring to doe it may exclude the reversioner for ever see the Booke at large Resolved when the heire or reversioner c. enters and expulses him to whom the Land is limitted he hath election to recover the Mesne profits in an action or reentry and retainer till he leavyes the inteir Summe and the other shall not have advantage of his owne wrong and if a stranger had entered and occupied the Devisee ought to have taken notice at his perill for Vigilantibus non c. and none is bound to give notice but here the Heire himselfe concealed the will and the Devisee had no remedy for the Mesne profits after the death of the heire Resolved that a Gardian shall not ouste Tenant for life nor yeares of the Tenement Resolved that admitting the Gardian shall ouste Tenant for yeares yet he shall not hold over because his terme is certaine in the commencement continuance and end otherwise of Tenant by Elegit Statute c. they shall hold over because the terme is uncertaine Southcots Case 43. Eliz. in banco regis fo 83. IF A. doe deliver goods to B. for to keepe the goods be purloyned away yet B. shall be charged in a Writ of detinue For to keepe and to keepe safely is all one but if B. doe take them to keepe as his owne goods he shall not be charged with them And if A. doe pledge or Guage goods unto B. in this Case B. shall not answer for them if they be purloyned for he had some property in them and not a custody onely but a ferryman a common Inkeeper or a Carrier which taketh hyre they ought to keepe the goods safely and they shall not be discharged if they be stollen or purloyned But a Factor or a Servant although he have wages doing his indeavour shall not be charged Luttreles Case 43. Eliz. in banco regis fo 86. IF a man have estovers eyther by grant or prescription to his house although he alter the Rooms and Chambers in his House it seemeth that the alteration of the qualities so as it be not of the house it selfe and without making new Chimnyes by which no prejudice accrewes to the owners of the Wood is not any destruction of the prescription and though he make new Chimnyes or make a new addition to his old house he shall not loose his prescription thereby but he may imploy or spend any of his new estovers in the Chimnyes or in that part newly added It was also resolved that if a House or Milne doe fal or be taken downe by the act of the owner or by wrong of another yet for that the perdurable part which includes all doth remaine which is the Land whereupon the Fabrick is built he may reedifie the same againe without any Losse of his apendant or apurtenant but it ought to be upon the same place which was the Foundation of the old House for as it did support and in judgement of Law included the ancient house when it was standing so it supports and includes the new house so as it is in a manner a continuance of the ancient house Diverse Tenants doe hold of another as of his Mannor by fealty and suite to the Lords Milne the Lord doth alien his Milne with the suite of his Tenants and after the vendor dyeth and his Sonne entereth and buildeth a new Milne upon the other part of his demeane he shall have the suite to his owne Milne which the Vendee had before for the suite belongeth to him that hath the Mannor for no man may have suite to his milne by reason of a Tenure If it be not of Corne growing upon the Lands within the Seigniory or Mannor and the Lord may erect a new Milne within any part of the Mannor and the Tenure is due to the same and not to any particular Milne Druries Case 43. Eliz. Error in Banco Regis fo 84. A Countesse being a Widdow retaineth three Chaplaines he who is last reteined is not capable of a dispensation for the Statue of 21. H. 8. c. 13. is executed by reteining of two and the reteining of the third shall not devest the capacity which was in the first two but if the reteiner had beene at one time he who is first promoted shall be first preferred because in Aequali jure c. 2. Resolved if the two first die the third is not capable of dispensation without a new reteiner because he was reteined at the common Law and not according to the Statute Quod ab initio non valet c. As if the Sonne and Heire of a Baron reteineth a Chaplaine and giveth him Letters under his Seale and after the Father dyeth And it was said that the said Act shall be taken strictly as if a Baron be made Gardian of the 5. parts he shall reteine no more Chaplains then before and if a Baron retaine two Chaplaines who are promoted he cannot discharge them and reteine others during their lives Slades Case 44. Eliz. fo 92. IT was resolved that every contract executory imports in it selfe an assumpsit For when one doth agree to pay money or to deliver any thing by that he doth assume and promise to pay or to deliver the things and therefore when he selleth any goods to another and agreeth to deliver them at a day to come and the other in consideration thereof agreeth to pay so much money at such a day in this case both parties may have an Action of Debt or Action upon the case upon the assumpsit for the mutuall executory agreement of both parties import in themselves as well a reciprocall Action upon the Case as an action of debt and a recovery or barr in an action of debt is a good Barre in an action upon the Case brought upon the same contract and so likewise in an Action upon the Case a recovery or Barre in the same is a good plea in an Action of Debt upon the same contract The Defendant in an Action of the Case upon the assumpsit may not wage his Law as he may doe in an action of Debt If a Summe of money be promised in Marriage to be paid at severall dayes an Action upon the assumpsit lyeth for non payment of the first although no Action of Debt lyeth untill all the dayes be past Multitudo errantium non parit errori patrocinium and if the Debtor of the King sueth by Quo minus in the Exchequor the defendant shall not have his Law for the benefit of the King Adams and Lamberts Case 44. and 45. Eliz. in banco Regis in Ejectione firmae fo 104. UPon consideration of the Statute of 1 E. 6. cap. 14. it was resolved 1. That if one demise to any of his Kindred to superstitious uses although he limit them to pay certaine Summes of
money to the said uses yet these Lands are given to the King for it shall not be intended to be upon other consideration but that which they at that time conceived to be the service of God which is the most worthy consideration and the reason wherefore the demise was made to his Friends was because he imposed more trust in them then others therefore the persons shall not be regarded 2. A demise of an estate for life or in taile is within this Statute by equity although that the Statute saith To have continuance for ever for the intent of the Statute was to tolle such uses and regardeth not the time of their continuance 2. An estate taile may continue for ever and so was the intent of the devisor in this case that the uses should continue for ever for he limits his heire to doe it 3. Without this construction the Statute should be defrauded 3. The Statute giveth to the King Lands given for the finding of a Priest and giving of Lands upon condition to find a Priest is within the Statute for this is more compulsory then the other 4. All the Land is given to the King but not by the first Branch for that extends onely to lawfull Chanteries or those who have countenance of lawfull comencement but not to such who are without any colour of lawfull comencement as if they were founded by license of the Pope this chantry is without colour of lawfull comencement or foundation also if Lands be given to the finding of a chantery without Corporation this is out of the said Branch Neither by the second Branch for that giveth the Lands belonging to such Colledges to the King without which he shall have onely the Scites but by the third Branch for this extends to finding of a Priest without Corporation But 't was objected that the Land was not given to the finding of a Priest for he had but a pension out of it and the Statute is that the King shall have in as large c. as the Priest had it 2. Here is a good use limitted six pence by the Weeke to six poore men and although it be Ad orandum c. this is not within for it is out of the Statute except that Orisons be to be performed in publique For answer to these these differences were taken 1. If one give 20. li. per annum for the finding of a Priest and limit to the Preist 10. li. per annum all is given to the King for the residue shall be intended for the finding of necessaries otherwise it is if a condition be annexed to the gift to give 10. l. per annum to a Priest there the King shall have but 10. li. 2. Land of 20. l. per an is given to find a Priest with 10. l. thereof and that the other ten pound shall be to the Poore the King shall have but ten pound but if it be for finding of a Preist and maintainance of Poore Men without limitting how much the Priest shal have the King shall have the Land for otherwise he shall have nothing 3. If Land of 20. l. is given for finding Sallary for a Priest with 10. l. of it and also a good use is limitted there the King shall have but ten pound although that other necessaries are to be found for the Priest because a good use in certaine shall be preferred before a superstitious incertaine use but if nothing in certaine be limitted to the Preist the King shall have the Land 4. If Land be given to find a Priest the King shall have it but if a Priest have but a stipend the King shall have but the stipend 5. When a certaine summe is limitted to a Priest and other good uses are also limitted which depend upon the superstitious use all is given to the King 6. If all the uses be superstitious of what certainty soever they are the land is given to the King otherwise it is if there be any good use and as to that which was objected that the King shall have no more then the Priest It was answered that that extends to the 1.2 and 4. Branches and not to the third for otherwise the King should never have the land it selfe for this was never used to be limitted to the Priest himselfe And although that these Orisons are to be made out of any Church yet it is within the Statute for the words Church or Chappell extend to Lamps and lights and not to prayers 2. The Statute speakes of an anniversary c or other like thing and this is a like thing but in the Case at Barre if he had said that his Friends should have the residue of the profits of the Land this had saved the Land Actons Case 45. Eliz com banco in a Quare imperit fo 117. A Noble Woman reteineth a Chaplaine who purchaseth a dispensation she taketh a Husband the Chaplaine is promoted to another benefice then that which he had before the reteiner his first benefice is not voyd It was Objected that the Statute speakes of duches c. being Widdowes or Married under the degree of a Baron and for that when she Marrieth above the degree she is out of the Statute and 't is not sufficient that she be within the Statute at the time of the reteiner but she ought to be so also at the time of the promotion It was answered that all which the Statute requires at the time of the reteiner is that she be a Noble Woman Married under the degree of a Baton or a Widdow and to be noble at the time of the promotion therefore a noble Woman Married above that degree cannot reteine or if at the time of the promotion she be not noble as if her Earle be attainted and although that Baron and Feme have but one body yet they have two souls wherefore it is not inconvenient that they should have severall Chaplaines and the reason for which the said provision was made for a noble Woman who marrieth an ignoble Husband was not to exclude those who married Nobles but because such Femes are in Law ignoble except they be noble by descent and without such provision shall be out of the Statute Baron reteineth a Chaplaine and dyeth the Chaplaine may reteine both the benefices but he shall be punished for non residency without suing a non obstante Dumpors Case 45. Eliz. banco regis in Trespas fo 119. A Man maketh a Lease provided that the Lessee or his assignes shall not alien the premises without speciall license of the Lessor c. The Lessor giveth license to the Lessee to alien the same or any part thereof c. in this Case the Lessee may alien and his assignes Ad infinitum without any more license and the proviso is determined The Lord Stafford made a Lease to three persons upon condition that they nor any of them should alien without the consent of the Lessor and after one of them did alien with
his consent and after the other two did alien without license and it was adjudged 28. Eliz. that in this case the condition being determined as to one person by the license of the Lessor it was determined in all for when the Lessee alieneth any part of the residue the Lessor may not enter into any part aliened with license and therefore the condition being determined in part is determined in all for the condition being entire may not be apportioned and 16. Eliz. Dyer 334. fuit deny per Popham Chiefe Justice Vide lit 80. b. 4. and 5. Ph. and M. Dyer 152. Bustards Case 1. Jac. fo 121. IN every lawfull exchange of Land this word Excambium imports in it selfe Tacite a condition and a warranty and the other a Voucher and recompence and all in respect of reciprocall consideration the one land being given in exchange for the other but that is a speciall warranty for upon the voucher he shall not recover other Lands in value but those onely which were given in Exchange and this warranty followes onely in privity for none may vouch by force thereof but the parties to the Exchange and their heires and no assignes If A give in Exchange three acres of Land to B. for other three acres and after one Acre is evicted from B. in this Case all the exchange is defeated and B. may enter into all his Lands Beverleys Case de non compos mentis in banco regis 1. Jac. fo 123. EVery act that a man De non compos mentis doth eyther concerning his Lands life or goods eyther done in Court of record or out of Court of record all acts that he doth in any Court of record eyther concerning his Lands or goods shall bind himselfe and all others for ever and those acts which he doth out of Court of record shall binde himselfe during life and in some Cases shall binde all others for ever so as the party himselfe shall not be admitted to stultifie himself or disable himself but an ideot a nativitate may not make Feoffment Gift Lease or Release but it may be avoyded during his Life by office at the Kings suite which shall have relation a tempore Nativitatis to avoyd all acts done by him and after his death the King shall deliver his Lands Rectis Haeredibus foure manner of men de non compos mentis 1. An ideot or foole naturally 2. One which was of good and perfect memory and by the visitation of God hath lost the same 3. Lunaticus qui gaudet lucidis intervallis who somtimes is of good and perfect memory and some other times Non compos mentis 4. He that is so by his owne act as a Drunkard All acts which a Lunatick during the time of his Lunacy doth and all acts which a mad man doth who once was of perfect memory and by the act of God hath lost his understanding are equivalent to the act done by an Ideot but the act which a man doth Qui Gaudet lucidis intervallis at such time as he is of good and perfect memory shall binde him and are good And a Drunkard who for the time of his Drunkenesse is Non compos mentis yet his drunkennesse shall not extenuate his act or offence but doth aggravate his offence and doth not derogate from the act which he doth during the time of his drunkennesse and that as well touching his Life Lands and goods as any other thing that concernes him The King shall have the custody of the Land goods Chattells c. of one non compos mentis to the use of him his Wife Children and Family a man non compos mentis shall not loose his life for felony or murder for no felony or murder can be committed without a felonious intent and purpose and he is deprived of reason understanding and intentions Dicta est fellonia quia fieri debet felleo animo furiosus non intelligit quid agit animo ratione caret non mulum distat a brutis as Bracton saith and stultus dicitur a stupore The End of the Fourth Booke THE FIFTH BOOK Claytons Case 37. Eliz. in Com. Banco fo 1. AN Indenture of demise dated 26. May 25. Eliz. to hold for three yeares from henceforth it was delivered at foure a clock in the afternoone of the twentieth of June after The Question was when the Lease should begin from henceforth shall be taken the day of the delivery inclusive idefi from the making or delivery Traditio loqui facit cartam this Lease must end the nineteenth of June in the third yeare after The day of the delivery is parcell of the tearme but a Die confeccionis or a Die datus the terme beginneth the day after the date from the date and from the day of the date is all one because that in judgement of Law the date includes all the day of the date c. Elmers Case 30. Eliz. Banco Regis fo 2. 1. REsolved that the Statute of 1. El. is a private act whereof the Court shall not take notice without pleading of it 2. Whereas the Bishop ousted his Lessee for yeares and made a Lease for three lives this is voidable by the successor for first the Statute giveth him power to make a Lease for twenty one yeares or three lives and therefore cannot make both 2. Lessee for lives shall have the rent reserved upon the Lease for yeares and shall not pay rent to the Bishop untill the terme determined and so hospitality will decay in the meane time and where 32. H. 8. ca ' 8. provided that the old Lease be surrendered before the making of a new illusory surrender upon condition is not within the act but judgement given against the Plaintiffe for not pleading of the said act of 1. Eliz. Jewells Case 30. Eliz. banco regis fo 3. LEase of a faire reservaing rent is not within the Statute of 1. Eliz. for although the rent be due by reason of the contract yet it is not incident to the reversion and 't is also without remedy by assise or distresse Lord Mountjoyes Case 31. 32. El. banco regis fol. 3. TEnant in tayle according to the Statute with power to make Leases c. reserving the ancient rent maketh a Lease of two distinct farmes reâ—erving the ancient rents in one summe out of both sthe farmes this is a new rent and not the accustomed rent and if he reserve a lesser rent during his life and after his death then the ancient rent the Lease is not good If Tenant in tayle be seised of three acres of Land every one of them of equall annuall value and all have beene demised for 3. shil per annum in this case he may not demise one of them for 12. d. per annum or two of them for 2. shil per annum and so Pro rata Justice Windams Case fo 31. 32. Eliza. Banco Regis in a Writ of Error fo 7
Parliament in the upper House that Leases made to the Queene by Colledges Deans and Chapters or any other having spirituall or Ecclesiasticall Livings against the provision of the Act 13. Eliz. ca ' 10. are restrained by the same Act as well as Leases made to common persons for they are disabled by Parliament to make estates the King being the head of the Common-wealth may not be an Instrument to defeate the provision of an Act of Parliament made Pro bono publico For though the Queene by the common Law had ability to take it yet insomuch the Parliament had dissabled them to make states estates made to the Queene against the Act are voyd Covenants c. Concerning Leases Assurances c. Spencers Case 25. Eliz. fo 16. Banco Regis A Lessee doth Covenant for himselfe his Executors and Administrators with the Lessor that he his Executors or Assignes shall build a Brick Wall upon parcell of the Land demised c. afterwards the Lessee assignes over his tearme to B. in this Case B. is not bound to build the Wall When the Covenant extends to a thing In esse parcell of the demise then the thing to be done by force of the Covenant is Quodammodo annexed and appurtenant to the thing demised and shall run with the Land and binde the Assignee although he be not bound by expresse Covenant But when the Covenant extends to a thing which had not essence at the time of the demise made that cannot be appurtenant or annexed to a thing which had not essence As if a Lessee Covenant to repaire the housses to him demised during the tearme this is parcel of the contract c. and shall bind the Assignee although he be not bound expresly by the Covenant But in this Case the Covenant concernes a thing which had not essence at the time of the demise but to be made after and therefore it shall binde the Covenantor his Executors and administrators and not the assignee for the Law will not annexe the Covenant to a thing which had not essence It was resolved in this Case if the Lessee had Covenanted for him and his assignes c. that in as much as it was to be builded upon the thing demised it should binde the assignee by expresse words Also if a warranty be to one his Heires and assignes by expresse words the assignee shall take benefite thereof and have a Warrantia cartae But although the Covenant be for him and his Assignes yet if the thing to be done be meerly collaterall to the Land demised and doe not concerne the same the Assignee shall not be charged as if the Lessee Covenant for him and his Assignes to build a house upon the Land of the Lessor which is not parcell of the demise or to pay any collaterall Summe of money to the Lessor or to a stranger this shall not binde the Assignee Also in a case of goods as Sheepe Chattell c. there is not any privity or reversion in the Assignee but meerely a thing in action in the personalty which cannot binde any but the Covenantor his Executors or administrators which doe represent him The same Law is if a man demise Lands for yeares with a stock of Cattle or Summe of money rendring rent and the Lessee Covenants for him his Executors Administrators and Assignes to deliver the Stock of Cattle or the Summe of money at the end of the Terme yet the Assignee shall not be charged with the Covenant This word Concessi or Demisi imports a Covenant and if an Assignee of a Lessee be evicted he may have a Writ of Covenant so shall Tenant by Statute or Elegit of a Terme or he to whom the Lease is sould by force of any Execution c. If a man grant to a Lessee for yeares that he shall have so many estovers as shall serve to repaire his House or that he shall burne within his House or such like during the Tearme that is appurtenant to the Land and shall run with the same as a thing appurtenant in whose hands soever the same commeth Assignee of an Assignee Executors of an Assignee ASSIGNES of Executors or Administrators of every Assignee may have Action of Covenant for all are comprised within this word Assignees for the same right that was in the Testator or intestate shall goe to the Executors or administrators It was resolved That the Act of 32. H. 8. c. 24. extendeth onely to Covenants which touch the thing demised and not to collaterall Covenants Slingsbyes Case 29. Eliz. fo 18. Vpon error in the Exchequer Chamber IF any party Covenantor in a Tripertite Indenture breake Covenant all the rest of the parties Covenantees are to maintaine the Action notwithstanding the words of the Covenant are Et ad cum quolibet eoâ—um But if a man demise to A black Acre to B. white acre to C. greene Acre and Covenant with them and every of them in this Case in respect of the severall interest by these words And every of them the Covenant is made severall but if the demise be made to them joyntly then these words in the Covenant And every of them are made voyd A man cannot binde himselfe to three and to every of them to make that joynt or severall at the Election of severall persons for one selfe same cause for the Court will be in doubt for which of them to give judgement It was resolved that an interest cannot be granted joyntly and severally as if a man grant Prox imam advocationem or make a Lease for Terme of yeares of Land to two joyntly and severally these words severally are voyd and they are joyntenants but a power and authority may be joyntly and severally as to make livery or to sell for they have no interest or Action but are as servants to others And judgement was reversed Rosewells Case 35. Eliz. fo 19. BArgainor of Land covenanteth to make to the Bargainee such assurance as his Councell shall advise the Bargainee himselfe cannot devise it although he be Learned in the Law for then it would be no good plea to say Quod consilium non dedit advisamentum Higginbottoms Case 35. Eliz. Banco regis fo 19. A Parson assumeth to I. S. to make him such an estate in a Rectory as the Counsell of the said I. S. shall devise the Counsell shall be given to I. S. and he shall notifie it to the Parson Stiles Case 38. Eliz. Banco regis fo 20. A Charter with the words Haec indentura without a manuall Act of indenting of the paper or parchment is not an Indenture Sir Anthony Maynes Case 38. Eliz. fo 20. Error in Banco regis SIr A. M. Leaseth to S. for twenty one yeares and bindeth himselfe to make a new Lease unto him upon surrender of the old and Leaseth to another for 80. yeares by fine Scott the first Lessee bringeth debt and had judgement If you be bound to enfeoffee one in the Mannor of D. before
his owne just Debt for every Creditor by such meanes when the goods be not sufficient would strive to make himselfe Executor De son tort to satisfie himselfe and barr others c. And it is not reasonable that one should take advantage of his owne wrong Non facies malum ut inde fiat bonum melius est omnia mala pati quod malo consentire It is also cleere that all lawfull acts that such an Executor doth or disseisor or an abator c. are good Hargraves Case 41. and 42. Eliz. banco regis fo 31. LEssor bringeth Debt against the Administrator of the Lessee for yeares for rent due after the Administration committed in the Debet and so it ought to be because he himselfe tooke the profits and nothing is assets in his hands but the profits besides the rent but in all Actions brought by Executors as Executors the Writ shall be alwaies in the Detinet tantum although the duty accrew in their owne time Pettifers Case 45. Eliz. banco regis fo 32. UPon a fieri facias de bonis testatoris the Sheriffe returneth Nulla bona a Writ issueth to the Sheriffe to inquire by inquest if the Executors have wasted and how much who returneth that they have and judgement given against them De bonis proprijs they bring error in redditione Executionis and the Execution was reversed for the course is upon Nulla bona to have a speciall Fieri Facias to make Execution De bonis proprijs if they have wasted and if the Sheriffe so doth where they have not wasted they have remedy against him but if he taketh an inquest and returneth it although it be false there is no remedy against the Sheriffe or any other Robinsons Case 1. Jac com banco fo 32. EXecutor brings Debt as Administrator and is barred by Plea that he is Executor he may bring Debt as Executor for he was barred as to the Action of the Writ to have Debt as Administrator but not to the Action Reades Case fo 33. 2. Jac. com banco WHen a man dyeth intestate and a strange person taketh the goods of the intestate and useth them or sells them this maketh him an Executor of his owne wrong for when none assumeth to be Executor nor takes Letters of administration there the using of the goods is sufficient to charge one as Executor De son torte for those to whom the Deceast was indebted unto have not any other in this case against whom they may bring their actions for recovery of their Debts When an Executor is made and he proveth the Testament or assumeth upon him the charge and doth administer in this case if a stranger take any of the goods and claime them for his owne this doth not make him an Executor of his owne wrong because there is another lawfull Executor A lawfull Executor shall not be charged but with the goods that come to his hands after that he assumes upon him the charge of the Will c. but if another man first take the goods c. before the lawfull Executor hath assumed the Execution or proved the Testament in this case he may be charged as an Executor of his owne wrong Constructeon of the Statutes of Jeofails c. Amendment of Records Fines Recoveries c. Playters Case 25. 26. Eliz. Banco regis fo 34. THe Defendant was found guilty in trespasse Quare clausum fregit pisces suos cepit and damages assessed intirely it was moved in arrest of judgement because in the Count neither the nature nor the number of Fishes was shewed It was answered by the Plaintiffe That the Defendant is found guilty to damages and so Non refert of what nature or number they are 2. That the Fishes themselves are not to be recovered but damages for them therefore no need to shew the certainty 3. All the damages shall be intended to be given for the close broken which is laid in the Declaration 4. It is matter of forme ayded by the Statute of 18. Eliz cap. 14. But judgement was stayd for the Office of the Declaration is to reduce the Writ to certainty for otherwise upon such a generall Issue if the Jury give a false Verdict they cannot be attainted and damages shall be intended to be given for all because they are intire but if they had beene severed the Plaintiffe shall recover for so much as is well pleaded and this is matter of substance and not of forme because it is no default of the Clerke but of the Plaintiffe and therefore not aided by the Statute Walcots Case 30. Eliz. banco regis fo 36. DEbt was brought against Baron and Feme in the Detinet tantum upon an Obligation by the Feme before Marriage it ought to be in the Debet and Detinet because the Baron had the goods of the wife in his owne right and for that reason debt is brought against the Heire in the Debet and this is matter of substance and point of the Action not remedied by the Statute of 18. Eliz. c. 14. Baynehams Case 30. Eliz. in Scaccar fo 36. AN Ejectione firmae of Lands in A. B. and C. tryed for the Plaintiffe by a Visne out of A. onely this is insufficient and not remedied by any Statute Gardiners Case 21. Eliz. Banco regis fo 37. 23. Jurors are returned 12. appeare and finde for the Plaintiffe this is remedied by 18. Elizabeth cap. 14. Bishops Case 34. Eliz. banco regis fo 37. VAriance is betweene the Writ and count in name the Plaintiffe recovers the Defendant bringeth Error the Writ was remov'd into the Kings Bench and the judgement was reversed because the Statute remedieth where there is no Originall but not where the Originall is vitious and although it were removed after pleading c. yet because the fault appeared to the Court the judgement was reversed Teys Case 34. Eliz. Banco regis fo 38. BAron and Feme levy a fine to one who grants and renders to them two and to the Heires of the Baron and after renders part to the Feme in taile the remainder over the Heire of the Husband brings a Writ of Error and assignes for error the said Variance 1. Resolved that there needeth not a precise forme in render upon a fine but it shall be in this case construed as a grant by Charter for it is but a grant of record 2. There are five parts of a fine 1. The Originall 2. The License to accord for which the Kings Silver is due and ought to be entered upon the Writ of Covenant and the summe and he who payeth it that is he in whom the fee reposeth the Plea and betwixt whom c. and the Land ought to be mentioned 3. The concord which is the substance of the fine for if upon that the Kings silver be paid although the party dye the fine is good 4. The Note which is many times taken for the Concord And lastly the Foote of the
pending the Writ Resolv That by the common Law by admission and institution the Usurpor gaines the inheritance of the advowson without regard of the nonage of the Patron because he is in by judiciall act and the Bishop shall be supposed not to doe wrong to the Patron and the incumbent shall not be disturbed to excercise his function but the King shall have a Quare impedit at the common Law Collation doth not put him who hath right to present out of possession but if one have right to Collate it doth an infant by the Act of W. 2. c. 5. shall have a Quare impedit if a man usurp upon an infant who had a Mannor to which c. by discent who at full age infeoffeth B. the Church voideth c. by the usurpation the infant was out of possession and his right passed not and seems the Infant is without remedy If a Clerke commeth in by course of Law this gaineth not the inheritance against the right Patron who was not party to the writ The King shall not recover damages by this Statute for he is not within the first branch Si tempus semestre transierit nor within the second Branch for that depends upon the first yet he shall count to damages An incumbent shall not be moved if he be not named in the writ and if he be not admitted c. pending the writ and lapse shall not incurre if the Bishop be named in the Writ otherwise if he be not If he who is presented pending the Writ be in by rightfull Patron or not yet he who recovereth in a Quare impedit shall have a generall Writ to the Bishop which he must execute of necessity and after that the parties may try their titles as the Law shall determine Countesse of Rutlands Case in the Starre-Chamber 3. Jacobi fo 52. THat the person of a Countesse or a Baronesse may not be arrested for Debt or trespasse for although in respect of their Sex they may not sit in the Parliament yet they are Peers of the Realme and shall be tryed by their Peers Stat. 20. H. 6. Peers of the Realme may not be sworne in any inquest a Countesse in Marrying with a Husband doth loose her Name of a Countesse If a Baronesse c. by Marriage marry againe under the Nobility shee looseth her dignity but if she be Noble by Birth or descent yet whomsoever she Marryeth she remaineth Noble for Birth-right is Character intelebilis and that which is gained by Marriage may also be lost by Marriage A Sheriffe ought not to dispute the Authority of Courts but he ought to Execute the Writs to him directed for thereunto be they Sworne Serjeant at Mace upon a cap. ad satisfaciendum came to the the said Countesse in Cheapside being in her Coach and touched her body with the Mace and said I arrest you Madame at the Suite of S. and those were all the words that were us'd therupon compell'd the Coach man to carry her unto the Counter-gate in Woodstreete and the Sheriffe tooke her into his house In this Case it was resolved that the Sheriffe Bayliffe c. upon the Arrest ought to shew at whose suite out of what Court for what cause it is and when the processe is returnable and that this generall Arrest of the Countesse cannot be said that it was by force of the said Writ of Execution and that this Arrest was of the Serjeants owne head without warrant and against Law and that the said Countesse was falsly imprisoned but she remained in the Sheriffes custody 7. or 8. dayes untill shee paid the Debt but because the Arrest was by a fained Action entered in the Counter the Serjeants were sentenced The Lord Chandos case 4. Jacobi fol. 55. THe King grants to B. in taile and in consideration of the surrender of the Letters Patents by force whereof the King is seised in fee granteth to him and his wife and to the heires of B. the reversion passeth for the recitall that the King was seised in fee was but the Collection of the King and no part of the consideration or suggestion of the party And when the King grants land in posseâ—… if he had but a reversion this shall passe for he is not deceived because lesse passes then he intended Bredimans case 4. Jacobi Com. Banco fol. 56. A Man deviseth a rent for life out of a Mannor and he deviseth the Mannor for yeares the termor enters and pays the rent after the Terme the devisee brings an assize against the Terretenant Resol Payment by lessee for yeares of the rent giveth no seisin to have an assize 1. In respect of the imbecillity of his estate 2. He cannot give seisin because he had not seisin and therefore a Pracipe lyeth not against him because he cannot render seisin but he may take seisin to the use of him in the freehold A disseisor may give seisin of a rent secke because he hath a freehold and it is lawfull 3. A rent secke is caecus siccus therefore it behoveth the first payment which giveth life unto it shall be made by a Tenant of the freehold and in this case being created by devise an Annuity lyeth not thereupon otherwise if it be by grant and Tenant of the freehold ought to attorne to a grant of such a rent over therefore he shall give seisin But seisin by a Bailiffe is good if seisin were had before within sixty yeares and seisin given by Tenant at will is good but it ought to be pleaded as payment by the lessor himselfe If the King hath rent out of a ville to be paid by all the Inhabitants seisin alledged in generall without naming any is good Gatewards case 4. Jac. in Com. Banco fol. 59. TO claime common ratione Commorantiae residen in villa de B. is not good for no man may have interest â—…ommon in respect of a Messuage wherein he hath no interest For custome should alwayes extend to that which hath certenty and continuance and without question tenant in fee simple ought to prescribe in his owne name and tenant for life or yeares by elegit at will c. in the name of him that hath the Fee and he that hath no interest cannot have any common and none that hath any interest although it be but at will and ought to have common but by good pleading he may enjoy the same No improvement might be made in any wasts if this custome viz. in respect of habitation and Comorance should be allowed for tenants for life or yeares at will by elegit by Statute c. of the houses of the Lord should have common in the wasts of the Lord if this prescription were allowed which were inconvenient A Custome that every Inhabitant in B. shall have a way over such grounds either to the Church or Markett c. is a good custome for that is onely easement and no profit and a way or passage may well sequi
if it appeare to the Court that an action is not maintainable without the doing of it there the doing of it must be averred as if an Abbot sole grants an annuity to J. S. Pro Consilio c. in action brought against the successor he must averre that he had given Counsell c. to the use of the House otherwise if against the grantor Englefields case 34. Eliz. in Scaccario fol. 11. SIr F. E. covenanted to stand seised to the use of himselfe for life the remainder to his Nephew Proviso that it shall be voyde upon tender of a Ring by him after he was attainted of Treason and all his inheritances forfeited by Statute the Queene leaseth to the defendant for forty yeares by Statute it was inacted that every one who had a patent of land of a person attainted shall exhibit it into the Exchequer within two yeares to be Inrolled one authorized by Letters patents in the name of the Queene tenders the Ring in the life of Sir Fr. the Queene bringeth Intrusion 1. Resol When the Q. tenant pur auter vie leaseth for yeares this is good without recitall of her estate for it is lesse then her estate as if she grant Totum statum suum for there is no torte and she is not deceived 2. That this condition is given to the Q. but object 1. That it was inseparable from Sir Fr. for his intent was the substance of it and his intent cannot be transferred over 2. Naturall affection is made the Judge whether the Nephew deserve that the use shall be revoked and in so much that naturall affection cannot be transferred no more can this condition which was created by naturall affection and naturall affection determineth the estate 3. Although the benefit of this collaterall condition be given to the Q. the performance is not As to the first and second It was answered that the condition is onely the substance and all the residue is but a flourish and that is not an inseparable condition for any one may tender a Ring as well as he As to the third The performance is given to the Q. as incident to the Condition 4. It was objected that the estate of Sir Fr. was not subject to the condition because he was not possessed by limitation of use and by 27. H. 8. but he was seised of his auncient inheritance ergo the lease shall not be avoyded in the life of Sir Fr. It was answered that Sir Fr. was seised by limitation of use and that the lease shall be avoyded 5. It was objected that the Q. having made this lease being seised pur auter vie by her owne act she shall not defeate it after It was answered that the Q. shall avoyde it for her grant shall not inure to two intents 1. to make the lease c. 2. to suspend the condition and when the Q had two rights she shall not loose both without speciall words 6. It was objected that this tender ought to be found by office because matter in paijs and if it be false the party hath no remedy because the certificat is not traversable It was answered that Certificats which informe the Q. of her title are traversable but Certificats which are in nature of Trialls are not also by the Tender the uses are determined and by the attainder and the act of 33. H. 8. the land is vested in the Q. 7. It was objected that the conveyance was voyd because it was not inrolled within two yeares as the Statute requires and so Sir Fr. was seised in fee and the lease unavoydable It was answered that it was tendred in the Exchequer to be inrolled within two yeares which is all the Statute requireth the forfeiture was established by a speciall act 35. Eliz. The Case of Swannes 34. Eliz. fol. 15. A Game of Swannes in a common River are seised into the Queenes hands upon office found I. Y. pleads that Abbas c. gavisi fuerunt totoproficuo omnium cignorum in aestuaria praedict indificantium and makes her selfe title to them prayeth an ouster Le manie All White Swannes in a common River who have gained their naturall liberty may be seised for the King because they are Volatilia regalia but a Subject may have them in his owne River and if they escape into a common River he may take them againe upon fresh persuite Cignets shall be divided betweene the owners of the Swannes equally but upon the Thames the owner of the Land shall have the third by the custome whosoever hath a Swan-marke must have it by grant of the King or prescription and he may grant it over and he ought to have freehold of five Marks per annum by the Statute of 22. E. 4. c. 6. A man may prescribe to have Wyld Swannes but not as here but that the Abbot c. have used to take of them to their owne use and therefore adjudged against I. Y. A Swanne may be an estray and so cannot any other fowle Sir Thomas Cecils Case 40. Eliz. in Scaccario fol. 18. SIr T. C. entered into an obligation to the Queene to performe Covenants and shewed in the Exchequer-Chamber matter of equity to discharge him of the said Debt according to the Statute of 33. H. 8. c. 39. 1. Resol that Branch of the Statute which giveth liberty to the Subject to plead matter in equity in barre of Debt due unto the King extendeth to Debts due at the common Law as well as by this Statute because this Statute gives more speedy remedy for them and so within the purview thereof and so the other proviso of equall charging of Lands Subject to Deb. t s of the King is generall 2. The Court of Exchequer-Chamber in this case may decree upon English bill although that Processe be in the Exchequer at the common Law because to that purpose they are as one Court 3. An obligation to performe Covenants after Breach of them is within the Statute The Lord Andersons Case 41. Eliz. in Scaccar fo 21. TEnant in taile is bound by recognizance to I. S. who is attainted Tenant in taile dyes his issue aliens Bona fide the King shall not extend these Lands by the Statute 33. H. 8. c. 39. 1. Before that Statuâ—e the King could not extend Lands in the hands of the issue in taile for the Debt of his auncestor because he was bound by W. 2. De Donis 2. By that Statute Lands are extendable in the hands of the issue in taile for Debt due to the King by judgement recognizance obligation or other specialty and other cases are out of the Statute 3. The Alienee Bona fide is not within the Statute because favoured as a purchasor and he is a stranger to the Debt and comes in upon good consideration and benefit is given against the issue in taile which was not before 4. Debts due to a Subject and forfeited to the King are not within the Statute for they are not due originally
from an auncestor a Subject but not where it discends from an auncestor who was King except in speciall cases 3. The issues of the King at the time of the levying of the fine are subjects therefore within the Statute and it seemd to them that there ought to be Letters Patents to give power to the Conisee to enter into the Land Nevills Case 2. Jacobi fo 33. THe dignity of an Earle intailed is forfeitable for treason 1. Resolved this is within the Statute of W. 2. De donis and experience is to give dignities in taile with remainders over also this was an office anciently and offices may be intailed 2. A dignity may be forfeited at the common Law by a condition in Law for the Office of Earle was Ad consulendum Regem tempore pacis defendendum Regem tempore belli therefore he forfeits it when he takes Councell and Armes against him 3. If it were not forfeited by the common Law yet it is by 26. H. 8. cap. 13. by this word Hereditament and the words use or possession which are added are to shew that every Hereditament shall be forfeited at the common Law Donee in taile had Potestatem alienandi post prolem suscitatam but if hee reteine the Land himselfe he hath no absolute fee for none shall inherit but the heire Per formam doni so it is now in case of annuity and other things out of the Statute Penall Statutes 2. Ja. fo 36. WHen a Statute is made by Parliament the King cannot give the penalty benefit or dispensation of the same to any Subject but the King may make a Non obstante to dispense with any perticular person that he shall not incurre the penalty of a Stature and the King after a forfeiture or penalty of a Statute by judgement and recovery may grant the same to any of his Subjects by way of reward and all the Judges of England subscribed to this the 8. Day of November 1604. Lillingstons Case 5. Jacobi fo 38. TEnant in fee grants a rent charge proviso that the person of the grantor shall not be charged the grantee acknowledgeth a recognizance according to 23. H. 8. and after releaseth to the grantor the conisee sueth an extent and brings debt against the grantor Terretenant 1. Resolved the rent is extendable for notwithstanding the release it is In esse as to the Conisee and cannot be discharged by the act of the Conisor also the extent relateth to the judgement at which time it was extendable See the Lord Aburgavenies Case in the sixth Report 2. Debt lyeth not so long as the extent indureth for so long the rent hath continuance although that by the release the freehold be determined if a rent charge be granted for life with proviso as above-said if the rent be determined debt lyeth against the grantor because he had no other remedy Bedels Case 5. Jacobi fo 40. R. B. Covenants in consideration of paternall love c. to stand seised to the use of himselfe for life the remainder to his Wife for life the remainder over 1. Resolv although the consideration in the deed runneth not to the Wife yet another consideration may be averred which stands with the Deed. The limittation of an use to the Wife importeth a consideration in it selfe so if it be to any of his blood but if he Covenant in consideration of a 100. l. to stand seised to the use of his Sonne nothing passeth untill inrollment Quia expressum facit cessare tacitum Beresfords Case 5. Jacobi fo 41. AN use is limitted to A B. and of the heires Males of the said A. lawfully begotten this is fee taile notwithstanding the words of the Body be wanting and that lawfully begotten are implied for no heire shall inherit who is not lawfully begotten Resolved that to create an inheritance the word Heires is necessary but the words De corpore are not necessary to make an estate taile if there be words which Tantamount and here the sence according to the intent of the Donor is of or by the said A. lawfully begotten A gift to a man haeredibus de se exeuntibus or Haeredibus suis de prima uxore sua are estates taile Kenns Case 4. Jacobi fo 42. C. K. had issue by E. S. M. K. and they are divorced and the Marriage sentenced void C. K. marrieth F. they have issue E. K. C. dyeth E. K. is found by office to be Heire M. and W. her Baron preferre a bill in the Court of wards to traverse the Office to which the Committees of the wardship answer one of the Committees dyeth M. and W. sue a Bill of Reviver and M. having issue E. dyeth E. her issue and R. her Baron bring a new Bill of Reviver 1. Resolved so long as the sentence stands in force the issue of the first feme is a Bastard because the spirituall Judge hath jurisdiction thereof and our Law giveth faith unto it Sentence of divorse may be repealed after the death of the parties but no divorse can be after their dearh for that will Bastardise the issue and the Court of the King hath triall of it originally not being hindered by any Sentence 2. The Plaintiffe shall not have a traverse without an office found for her for the King being sure of wardship shall not be ousted by one before that he be sure to have benefit by him and 2. E. 6. cap 8. doth not extend to give a traverse without office but if by two offices two are found Heires whereof one is within age by that Statute the other may traverse immediatly 3. A bill of reviver upon a bill of reviver shall not be suffered for the infinitnesse no more then a Writ by Journeys accompts By all the last bill was absurd which prayeth that the first bill be revived because M. was dead but it ought to be that her Heire may traverse The End of the Seaventh Booke THE EIGHTH BOOK The Princes Case 3. Jacobi in Chancery fo 1. THE Queene 37. Eliz. grants three Mannors parcell of the Duchee of C. to H. L. and G. M. the King at the supplication of the Prince brings a Scire facias against the said H. L. and S.H. to make Livery to the Prince by force of the Statute of 11. E. 3. H. L. pleads Null tielum recorde S. H. pleads the Patents with a Non obstante 32. H. 8. whereby these Mannors were made parcell of c. and the Act of Confirmation 43. Eliz. As to the plea of H. L. the Atturney sheweth an Inspeximus and demurreth upon the plea of the other two who joyne and as Amici curiae repeate part of the Statute of 1. H. 7. touching the Duchie H. L. demurreth 1. Resolv the Charter of creation of the Prince Duke of C. 11. E. 3. is an Act of Parliament for such a limittation to the first-begotten Son is void without Statute for if Grandfather King the Father Duke and Sonne be if
the King dyes the Father is King and the Son Duke by the said Statute against the rules of Law 2. The Lands cannot be so annexed to the Duchie that they cannot be severed without Statute 3. The estate is limitted to cease when the King hath no first begotten Son and to revive when he hath which cannot be without Statute 4. It should be absurd that six being then created Earles that their creation should be firme and the Creation of the Prince void 5. In the Charter there is De communi consilio Praelatorum c. and in the end Per ipsum Regem totum concilium in Parliamento such an Act as beginneth Rex Statuit and alwayes reputed for a Statute shall not be drawne in question but if it be Rex ex assensu the Commons or Lords omitting the other part it is voide 2. The said Charter having the force of a Statute is good without aid of any other Statute and although the King in his Scire facias recite another Act for thâ—s surplus the writ shall not abate 3. The Prince had the Dukedome in Fee for it is an inheritance because 21. E. 3. 41. the Princesse was indowed and it is no estate taile because it is not limitted of what body it shall come but onely that they shall be Heires to the black Prince 4. Against a generall Statute Nul tiel recorde shall not be pleaded for although it be lost yet the Judges ought to take notice of it and this is such an one which concernes the Prince and the Statute of confirmations doth not extend unto it 1. Because this hath a speciall relation to certeine defects as Misnosiner c. 2. Patents are made good onely against the King saving the right of others therefore the Princes right is saved In a Scire facias the King or Prince may reply but the most formall way is for the Attourney to replie as here he did No Sonne of the King but his first begotten shall be Duke of C. although he be Heire apparent to the Crowne Calyes Case 26. Eliz. Banco regis fo 32. 1. REsolved that to maintaine an action against an Inkeeper for goods lost c. it ought to be a common June 2. He ought to be a Passenger therefore a Neighbour shall not 3. An inholder shall not answer for any thing but that which is Infra hospitium therefore if a Passenger require that his Horse be put to grasse the inholder shall not answer if he be stollen otherwise if he require it not 4. There ought to be a default in the Inholder or his Servants therefore if a Guest bring one with him who stealeth the goods the Inholder shall not be charged otherwise if the Hostler appoint one with him in his Chamber who doth it But an inholder shall not be charged if he require the Guest to put his goods in a Chamber and he leaves them in the Court but it is no excuse to the Inholder that he delivered the Key of the Chamber to the Guest or that no goods were delivered to him 5. The Hostler shall answer for Charters if they be stollen but not if a Guest be beaten and all this appeares by the Writ and the words of it Paynes Case 29. Eliz. com banco fo 34. A Feme Tenant in taile taketh Baron and hath issue who is heard to cry and dyeth the Feme dyeth without issue the Husband shall be Tenant by the courtesie for although the state of the Feme be determined yet it is Tacite implied in the guift that every Husband of a Feme inheritable to the said estate shall have the Land for his life after the death of the Feme if he be intitled to be Tenant by the courtesie If a Feme be delivered of a Monster this doth not intitle the Husband to be Tenant by the curtesie otherwise it is if the issue had humane shape but is blemished if a Feme be ripped and the issue taken out of her Wombe the Baron shall not be Tenant by the curtesie otherwise it is if the issue which they had dyes and Lands discends after A man shall not be Tenant by the courtesie but where his issue may inherit as heire to the Feme therefore he shall not be of a possession in Law because there he makes title from the auncester of the Feme and not from the Feme Barretry 30. Eliz. fol. 36. A common Barretor is a common maintainer of Suites or quarrells in Courts or in the Countrey As first in disturbance of the peace Secondly in taking and keeping of possession with force or deceite Thirdly by false calumniation and sowing of Quarrells but to indite him of it it ought not to be that he hath done so twice or thrice but that he is a common doer of them Grieslies Case 30. Eliz. com banco fo 38. BY the custome one is chosen in a Leete to be Constable who refuseth and departeth out of the Court the Steward imposeth a Fine of 5. l. upon him for which the Bailiffes of the Lord distreine and he brings a replevin 1. Resolved every Judge of record may assesse a reasonable fine upon any man who makes contempt or disturbance to the Court but a Judge who is not of record cannot 2. This fine heeds not to be afferred because the Statute of Mag. Ch. speakes of Amerciaments and not of Fines for a fine is imposed by the Court and an Amerciament by the Jury therefore the Judgement in an Amerciament is generall Quod sit in misericordia and after upon estreits directed to the Coroners they are afferred and the Statute is that a Noble man shall be Amerced by his Peers which is not used at this day because it is reduced to a certeinty Viz. A Duke to 10. l. and others to 5. l. but an Amerciament of an Officer of the Court or he who hath execution of Writs shall be afferred by the Court so of any who is Judge as Suitors If a Juror appeare and is adjourned to a day of which he makes default this shall be inquired by his Companions for he shall be fined to the value of his Land per annum which the Court cannot know 3. A distresse may be taken for a fine without custome or for an Amerciament which is lesse Whittinghams Case 45. Eliz. fo 42. IT was resolved that if there be Lord and Tenant an Infant and the Infant make a feoffement in fee and execute the same by livery of seisin by his owne hands and after dye without heires in this case the Lord shall not have the benefit of the escheate and the Feoffement is unavoidable There be three manner of privities Viz. privity in blood 2. Privity in estate 3. Privity in Law Privities in blood as heires in blood privity in estate as joyntenants Baron and Feme Donor and Donee Lessor and Lessee c. privities in Law as Lord by escheate Lord of a Villaine c. If a Lessee for life
taile with crosse remainders to J. and K. M. discontinueth and dyeth without issue J. dyeth without issue K. dyeth and her issue brings a Formedon in the remainder and good although severall remainders for they depend upon one estate and commence by gift at one time In actions reall in which title is expressed a man shall not have one Writ for Lands to which he had severall Titles as in escheate cessavit Writ of Mesne c. but he may have a Writ of ward of Land onely although it be by severall Tenures nor one formedon upon two distinct gifts where the foundation is severall but he shall have it if there be one gift although it take effect at severall times because the foundation was joynt and single as upon a gift in taile to Brother and Sister who dye without issue or if the Brother dye without issue and the Sister dye having issue who dyes without issue he to whom the remainder limitted shall have one formedon although it vest at severall times so in an estate taile to Father and Sonne and so here In actions reall founded upon Torte a man shall have one Writ to recover Lands to which he had severall Titles as in an assize a Writ of entry c. but in a Writ of entry upon disseisin made to my Mother and her Sister Coperceners because there title is in the Writ it appeareth he ought to have severall actions but in personall actions one may comprehend severall torts and causes of actions as trespasse for trespasse made at severall dayes and places wast upon severall Leases and so of Debt Nota if a remainder be executed issue in remainder shall not have a formedon in remainder but in the discender and Count of an immediate gift but if there be a Lease for life to one the remainder in taile to A. the remainder in taile to B. A. dyes without issue if B. be chased to his formedon he shall not count of an immediate remainder but shall shew the first remainder to A. and that he is dead without issue 2. In formedon in the remainder or reverter omission of issue inheritable in the pedigree of the demandant abates the Writ but not upon the part of the perticular Tenant 3. The Demandant must make mention of the Sonne who survived the Father to which Son the Land discended but was not seised by force of the taile but he shall name him Sonne but not heire 4. The Demandant in a formedon in the Discender must make himselfe heire to him that was last seised and he to the Donee Note here because K. was never seised the Writ shall say Remanere not descendere and the Writ was Remansit jus because a discontinuance otherwise it should be Tenementa remanserunt Fraunces Case 7. Jac. fo 89. THe Plaintiffe pleads in barre of avowry that R. F. devised to I. his Sonne who leased to him the avowant replyeth that after the devise R. F. made a Feoffement to the use of the said I. upon condition that he shall suffer his Executors to take away his goods and the estate limitted to him was for sixty yeares if he should so long live with diverse remainders over and that after the death of F. I. hindered the Executors to carry away the goods whereupon T. in remainder entered and judgement given for the Plaintiffe 1. Resolv Although the condition be taken strictly the uses to I. onely and to his Heires are onely avoided by it 2. A disturbance by paroll is no Breach of the condition and because the avowant did not shew a speciall disturbance his replication was void 3. I. ought to have notice of the condition being a Stranger to it or otherwise he cannot breake it as a Copy-holder shall not forfeite for denyall of rent to him to whose use a Mannor is transferred before notice but he who bindes himselfe to doe any thing must take notice at his perill because he hath taken it upon him 4. Although that the Title which the Plaintiffe had made in barre to the avowry be destroyed yet he shall have judgement because his count is good and another Title that is to have the Land for sixty yeares by force of the uses declared upon the feoffement is given unto him by the Replication although that the title which he made for himselfe be destroyed yet the Court must adjudge upon all the record and judgement was entered for him accordingly Edward Foxes Case 7. Jacobi fo 93. A Revertioner upon a Lease for life the remainder for life in consideration of 50. l. demiseth granteth c. his reversion for 99. yeares rendering rent this is a bargaine and sale and there needs no attornement for the words of bargaine and sale are not necessary if there are words which tantamount as if at the common Law one had sould his Land an use had beene raised to the Vendee because their intent so appeared so here but if it appeare that their intent was to passe it at the common Law as if a Letter of Attorney be made to make livery the use had not risen and here appeareth their intent to passe it as a bargaine and sale because rent is reserved presently therefore it is reason that he shall have the rents of the particular Tenants presently which cannot be if it passe not by bargaine and sale and inrollment is not necessary because a tearme for yeares onely passeth in this case and â—o freehold See Sir Rowland Heywards Case 2. Report fo 35. Matthew Mannings Case 7. Jacobi fo 94. LEssee for yeares is bound in 200. Markes to W. C. and deviseth to his Wife for life and after her death to M. M and makes his Wife Executrix who agrees and dyeth intestate M. M. enters and takes administration of the goods not administred W. C. brings Debt against him Resolved that M. M. takes by Executory devise and not as a remainder and the estate limmitted to him in construction precedeth the limittation to the Wife as if he had devised that if the Wife die within the terme that then M. M. shall have the residue and also devised it to his Wife for life 2. This case is most strong because a Chattell which may vest and revest at pleasure of the Devisor without mischiefe to the Praecipe 2. A devise of the Terme and Occupation thereof all one Viz. So many yeares as the Feme shall live the remainder to M. M. 4. After the Executrix had agreed the first devisee cannot barre the Executory devise 5. A man may devise an estate which he cannot convey by act executed as to his Executors untill his Debts shall be paid the remainder over they have a Chattell determinable upon payment of the Debts which cannot be at the common Law If a Sheriffe sell a Terme upon a Fieri facias and judgement is reversed the sale shall stand otherwise none will buy any thing upon Execution and judgement was given for the Plaintiffe and affirmed in Error
sustenance c. his Chattells eyther reall or personall Hales Case 8. Jacobi fol. 172. THe Heire Ward comes to full age and tenders his livery and bargaines and sells and dyes the interest of the King is determined and the Bargainee shall not answer for the meane profits for the Heire had done all that he could doe and no default in him otherwise if he had not tendered it Sir Henry Constables Case 8. Jacobi fol. 173. THe Sonne of the Tenant of the King is made a Knight in the life of his Father the Father dyes the Sonne within age tenders his livery by that the meane profits are saved and the King shall not have the rates within age Virgill Parkers Case 8. Jacobi fol. 173. VIrgill Parker seised of the Mannor of Fushell in fee houlden of the King in Chivalry of his Dutchie of Lancaster maketh a feoffement of the one halfe to the use of himselfe for life and after to the use of Mary Coney whom he intended to Marry for her life for her joynture and after he Married her and then Leased the other halfe to I. C. for yeares for payment of his Debts and Legacies and dyed his Heire within age Question whither the King should have the third part out of the Mannor so Leased onely or out of the whole and it was resolved that it shall be out of the whole Mannor although the estate of the Wife was precedent that is equally out of both parts The End of the Eighth Booke THE NINETH BOOK Dowmans Case 28. Eliz. Communi Banco fol. 7. An Assize pleaded THe Defendant in an Assize makes Title by a recovery suffered by P. V. to certaine uses the Plaintiffe confesseth the recovery and saith That it was to the use of the said P. in fee and traverseth that it was to the uses mentioned by the Defendant the Jury found that it was suffered as the Defendant had alleadged and that by Indenture subsequent the intent of the parties was declared by them to be as the Defendant had alleadged adjudg'd for the Defendants 1. Resolved that this subsequent Indenture directs the uses of the precedent recovery by estoppell against the Recoveree and his Heires and although that it be granted that a deede is requisit to the priviledge without impeachment of wast yet the estate without deede is good No averrment can be taken that the recovery was to other uses then are mentioned in a precedent indenture otherwise in an Indenture subsequent because if uses were declared by a precedent indenture no Declaration after shall devest them So if P. V. had charged the Land and then had made such a Declaration this shall not devest estates of grantees c. but no declaration being the uses by Declaration subsequent be devested 2. In all actions betweene all persons and in all issues the Jury may give a Verdict at large and the Statute of W. 2. cap. 30. which giveth it in Assize is but an affirmance of the Common Law but a Jury cannot find a thing impertinent to the issue The death of Sir James Dyer Chiefe Justice of the Common Pleas with an ample and memorable Encomium of him by Sir Edward Cooke c. Vivit post funera virtus Anna Bedingfeilds Case 28. Eliz fol. 15. In dower A Common essoyne is allowable in dowre and the Statute of 12. E. 2. is to be intended of an essoyne in the Kings service for the Statute saith in prorogation of the right which is properly this essoyne which is for a yeare and a day 2. If tenant of the King dyeth seized of diverse Mannors and it is found by office that he dyed seized of one in dowre brought against the Heire of full age he sueth a Circumspecti agatis this extends not to more then is in the Office for this Writ is in the nature of an ayde praier and the King hath no right to seise more then is in the Office and as to this Mannor it was objected that it shall be allowed as well as if the Heire be within age for in this Case by the Statute of Praerogat Regis cap. 4. that the Feme may be indowed in Chancery It was answered that by the Statute of Bigamis cap. 4. ayde shall not be granted of the King in that Case and therefore before the Statute of Praerogat the King nor other Lord could not indow the Feme if the Heire were of full age because he is not then Gardian and the Statute of Praerogat giveth power to the King to indow the Wife in such case if shee will and not otherwise Where the Heire pleads to Dower detinue of Charters they ought to concerne the same Land and this Plea is to be allowed because the Feme who deteineth Chartars is not worthy to have Dower and also for the privity which is betweene the Heire and her 2. The Heire ought to shew the certeinty of the Charters or that they were in a Chest 3. None but the Heire himselfe shall have this plea nor the Heire himselfe if he commeth in by purchase or if the Feme had them by his delivery nor if he comes in as Vouchee having no Lands in the same County or as Tenant by resceite because in these Cases he cannot pleade as he ought that he is ready to render Dower 4. A Gardian shall not pleade it because the Charters doe not belong unto him but he may pleade detinue of the Ward and if be be not restored unto him unmarried the Feme shall loose her Dower and after the Tenant waived this plea and pleaded Vnques accouple in loyall Matrimony and the Bishop of N. certified that they were lawfully married where upon the Demandant had judgement Case of Avowry fol. 20. IF there be Lord and Tenant by fealty and rent and the Tenant make a Lease for yeares and the Lessee hath done his fealty and paid his rent continually and yet the Lord distreineth the Beasts of the Lessee for the rent and avowed upon a meere stranger as upon his very Tenant Question whither the Lessee be without remedy for it is a position in Law that a stranger to the avowry shall not plead but Hors de son fee c. But it was resolved that the Lessee shall be releeved and he must alledge that the Lessor is seised of the Tenancy c. and the Lord shall be compelled to avow upon the Tenant and the false avowry of the Lord upon a stranger which is not very Tenant shall not hurt the Lessee against the verity of the Case Quia veritas nihil veretur nisi abscondi If one come to distreine for damage Fesant and seeth the Beasts and the owner chase them out the party may not distreine them damage feasant but is put to his Action of Trespasse for the beasts must be damage feasant at the time of the distresse taken he who distreines for services upon fresh suite may avow upon the Land by the equity of 21. H. 8. c. 19. if
more uncertaine then the Charterhouse To the essence of a Corporation five things are requisite 1. Lawfull authority to incorporate and that may be foure wayes by the common Law as the King himselfe by authority of Parliament by the K. Chartar and by prescription 2. The persons either naturall or politicall 3. A name by which c. 4. A place 5. Words sufficient but not restrained to a strict forme 5. A Corporation may be without head as if the K. incorporate a Towne and give to them power to choose a Maior they are a Corporation before Election 6. It is a sufficient incorporation that there be an Hospitall potestate for the Temple was a Corporation in the time of H. 1. and yet was not built till H. 2. time but here the House was built before 7. The first Donor is in Law the Founder and when the K. giveth a name and designes the place and the persons the Founder hath nothing to doe but the Donation but if the K. leaveth the nomination to the party there many times although not of necessity he useth the words Fundo erigo c. But in truth the incorporation is made by the K. Chartar and the Founder is but an instrument 8. The Master may be at will for by the Letters Patents S. had power to name one at his will and pleasure 9. The money paid by some of the Governours in their private Capacity is good but the payment was as Governours and so they are acquitted 2. A rent was reserved which is a good consideration 3. A bargaine and sale may be upon confidence and trust 10. They may plead that they are seised In jure incorporationis although then it be not In esse In Answer to the presidents some are Explanatory some Nugatory Ex consuetudine clericorum Sir Thomas Fleming Chiefe Justice of England became sick whereof he after died so that he never argued the Case See there his severall advancements and commendations Mary Portingtons Case 11. Jacobi fol. 35. AFter many things said concerning Perpetuities in this Case it was said that a recovery in value barreth an estate taile although no recompence be had because it is by judgement as if issue in taile be barred in a formedon by warranty and assets but if the issue before judgement given alien the assets his issue shall recover the Land in taile if Tenant in taile suffer a recovery and die before Execution the issue is barred It is absurd that one may barre one of going about to suffer a recovery when he cannot bare the recovery it selfe but if such a condition had beene good a Feme Covert by that shall not loose her Land for she shall not loose her Land by any conclusion without examination upon Writ in Court and if shee acknowledge a recognizance this is void although it be with her Husband because there is no Writ to examine her if an Infant levy a fine this is voidable and shall be tried by inspection but a fine levyed by a Feme Covert is void if the Husband enter otherwise not Jennings Case 38. ElIz Banco regis fol. 43. Tenant for life suffers a common recovery in which he in remainder in taile is vouched who dyeth the reversion in fee is barred 1. Resolved that at the common Law a recovery against Tenant for life upon a true warranty and recovery in value binds him in the remainder 2. No Statute was made to provide for him who had a reversion or remainder upon an estate taile and the Statute of W. 2. c. 3. which giveth receite to a revertioner upon default of him who holds Per donum is to be intended of Tenant after possibility of issue extinct and 32. H. 8. c. 31. provides onely for a reversion or remainder upon a Lease for life 3. There have beene diverse evasions out of the Statute of 32. H. 8. as if Lessee for life Lease for yeares to one who infeoffeth one who in recovery Vouches Lessee for life this was out of the Statute because the Lessor and Lessee were put to a right whereupon 14. Eliz. c. 8. was made 4. 14. Eliz. extends not where Lessee for life vouched him in remainder in taile because it is in the power of him in remainder to dock the reversion c. and the course is that Tenant in taile bargaines and sells to one who suffers a recovery in which Tenant in taile is Vouched and yet the bargainee had but for life judgement affirmed in Error Lampets Case 10. Jacobi fol. 46. LEssee for 5000. yeares deviseth for life to one whom he makes Executor the remainder to his Sister and the Heires of her body and dyes the Sister taketh Husband they release to the Executor who demiseth for ten yeares to the Defendant the Baron dyes the Executor dyes the Feme takes another Baron who demise to the Plaintiffe judgement against the Plaintiffe 1. Resolved a devise of the use of a Tearme to one for life the remainder to another for life is good as an Executory devise 2. A devise of the tearme it selfe in such manner is good 3. The first Devisee cannot barre him who had the Executory devise 4. Assent of the Executor to the first devise is an assent for all 5. If such a devise be made to the Executor and he enter generally he shall have it as Executor 6. Such an Executory devise cannot be granted over 7. Such an Executory devise may be extinguished by release to the first devisee Object That the first devisee had all the interest in him and the other but a possibility which cannot be released as if Conisee of a Statute release his right in the Land yet he may sue Execution It was answered that a thing in Action cannot be granted to a Stranger neither by the Act of the party nor of Law but it may be released to the Terre-tenant and here to him who had the present interest 1. Because as it may be easily created being a Chattell so it may be easily determined 2. Every right as well present as future by joyning all who have interest one way or other may be extinguished so if the Executor and the Sister here had joined in an assignement this had beene good 3. When many things are requisite to the perfection of any thing the Law respects the Originall Act and here the fundamentall acts were the devise death of the devisor the assent of the Executor and death of the first devisee and shee hath a right that may be released and the death of the Executor is but a meanes to bring it into possession as a Feme Covert barreth her selfe of Dower by joyning in a Fine with her Husband but if the Baron sole levy a fine and dyeth and five yeares passe the Feme is not bound so if Tenant in ancient demesne levy a fine he had possibility to have the Land againe if the Lord bring a Writ of desceit but he may release that possibility but
them and after Judgement was given for the Plaintiffs Whistlers Case 10. Jacobi fol. 62. Vpon a speciall Verdict BEfore the Statute of Praerogativa Regis cap. 15. by the grant of the King of a Mannor all appendants without naming them passe and the Statute excepteth Knights Fees Advowsons and Indowments but all other appendants now passe without naming them and so doe Advowsons passe in case of restitution for the Statute speaketh of Grants and in Grants also without expresse mention by the words Adeo plené integré c. See other good matter there touching this Subject The Church Wardens Case of Saint Saviours in Southwark fol. 66. QUeene Elizabeth leased the rectory to the Church-Wardens of St S. for 21. yeares and after leased to them for 50. yeares in consideration of the payment of 20. l. and surrender of the Letters Patents by the Church-Wardens Modo habentes ad presens possidentes and the speciall Verdict found that they paid the 20. l. and that they delivered the Charter in Court to be cancell'd and that they paid the Fees but that no Vacat was made yet the grant is good for it appeares that the intent was not to make a surrender in deed because he saith Modo possidentes but a surrender in Law by acceptance of the second Letters Patents and although a Corporation cannot make a surrender in deed yet they may make a surrender in Law 2. Although an actuall surrender is requisit they have done all which belongs to them by delivery of the Chartar and payment of the fees and the Cancelling belongs to the Court. 3. Although it was recited that 20. l. was paid yet it needs not to be found for it is but in the personalty and is affirmed by the King to be paid and is also executed See Barwicks Case 5. Report 93. The Case of the Marshalsea 10. Jacobi fol. 68. In false Imprisonment AN Action upon the Case upon an assumpsit is brought in the Marshalsea whereas no party was of the Kings House the Plaintiffe recovered the Defendants arrested the Plaintiffe by a precept in the nature of a Capias ad satisfaciendum and he brings false Imprisonment and judgement given against the Defendants 1. Resolved the Steward and Marshall at the Common Law hath two Authorities One generall as Vicegerents of the Chiefe Justice in his absence within the Verge Another as Judges of the Marshalsea This last was limitted to Debt and Covenant where both are of the House and to trespasse Vi armis where one is but not if it concerne Land and because they have the generall authority at will and the other for life they draw many cases to the Marshalsea which ought to be in other Courts Their Jurisdiction by Fleta Lib. 2. cap. 2. Infra metas hospitij continentes 12. Leucas in circuitu And the Statute of 13. R. 2. c. 3. limits the 12. miles to be accounted about the Kings Tonnell 2. The reasons wherefore this speciall authority was given them were 1. Because the Suite there is by Bill by reason of their Priviledge which cannot be elsewhere 2. In respect of the necessity of attendance of the Kings Servants 3. If Strangers shall be suffered to sue there one Carman would sue another Carman there In aula Regis which were undecent but the generall authority vanished by the Act of 28. E. 1. c. 5. which Ordained that the Chancellour and Justices of the King should follow him therefore in Praesentia Majoris cessat c. and about 4. E. 3. the Court of K. Bench became Resident 3. The Statute of Articuli super Chartas is as much as an explanation of the great Charter and the Charter of the Forrest and not introductory of a new Law and the third Chapter of that act explaines the Jurisdiction of the Marshalsea as before and if he hold plea otherwise a prohibition lyeth and the party shall have an Action upon the Case as a consequent upon the Statute 4. That part of the Statute which giveth them Jurisdiction in trespasse shall be intended trespasse Vi armis 5. This action lyeth against the Defendants because the Court had not Jurisdiction and so have not done it by command of the Judge otherwise if the Court had Jurisdiction but proceedeth Inverso ordine or erroneously as if a Capias be awarded against an Earle c. one who is Indicted before Justices of the Peace cannot approve 1. Because he cannot assigne a Coroner 2. Because it is out of their Commission if a Court Leete be holden at another day then it ought to be the proceeding is Coram non judice otherwise it is of a Court Baron 6. R. 2. Action upon the Statute Plac. ultimo in the point that judgement in the Marshalsea when none of the parties is of the K. house may be avoided by plea without any Writ of Error which proveth that it is void Leonard Loveis Case 11. Jacobi fol. 78. In ejectione firmae for 8. acres c. L. L. seised of diverse Mannors in socage and in chivalry In Capite maketh a feoffement to diverse uses in an Indenture precedent whereby he limits to himselfe for life without impeachment of wast and to the use of his Lessees and devisees the remainder to his second Sonne in taile c. the reversion to himselfe with power of revocation after he purchaseth 8. acres in socage and revoketh as to certaine Mannors holden in socage and deviseth them and the 8. acres to his Eldest Sonne and the heires Males of his body for 500. yeares provided that if he alien otherwise then for yeares determinable upon the deaths of three persons or lesse number rendring the old rent or die without issue Male then to his second Sonne in taile with proviso to make Leases according to 32. H. 8. onely L.L. dyeth the Eldest Sonne enters into the 8. acres and dyeth leaving one Daughter who Marrieth R.D. who enters into the 8. acres c. second Sonne dyeth having L. L. who enters upon R. D. and leaseth to the Plaintiffe who enters upon whom the Defendant enters and ejecteth c. and if the entry of L L. the Lessor was congeable or not was the Question and it was adjudged that his entry was not lawfull and judgement was given against the Plaintiffe in this Case diverse points resolved some at the common Law and some upon 32 and 34. H. 8. of Wills 1. Resolv if a man seised of three acres of equall value one holden in Capite and giveth that and one of the other to his younger Sonne in taile he cannot devise any part of the third Acre because he had executed his power and if he purchase other Land in socage he can devise but two parts of that by reason of his reversion in Capite expectant upon the estate taile Object that the K. was once satisfied of the wardship by the Statute in respect of the Acre holden and the reversion thereupon shall not hinder the
devise of Land purchased after 2. The statute doth not regard this seck reversion but inheritances of annuall value Resp To the first that this reversion shall hinder the devise by the words of the Statute for he had a reversion of Lands holden but although the Statute saith that he may alien two parts by act executed or will if he alien to one of the three uses by act executed he may devise the reversion for the Statute is to be intended of an intire Alienation and where the Statute saith in reversion or remainder it is to be intended that the devisor be seised of such a remainder which drawes wardship To the second it was answered that things which of their nature are seck are out of the Statute but not things which of their nature are of annuall value but are not of value in respect of some Lease or gift Absque abliquo inde reddendo and therefore seck reversions are devisable by the said Statutes but if they be not yet they shall hinder the devises of other Lands To make one able to devise by those Statutes the time of Having Holding and disposing must concurre and therefore if a grant to the second Sonne here had beene in fee although with power of revocation the devise had been good because he had no Lands In Capite at the time of the devise if the Father conveyeth his Land to the use of his younger Sonne the eldest being within age after the death of his Father he shall be in ward although nothing discend A true Child and not in reputation is within the Statute and if the Sonne purchase Land Bona fide of his Father this is out of the Statute because it is not for his advancement If Tenant in socage devise and after purchase Land in Chivalry the devise is void for a third part but if Tenant in Chivalry and socage devise all and after aliens the Land holden this is good To make division that the King shall have a third part holden the Lands shall be taken according to their value at the time of the death of the Devisor The time of provision that a third part must discend needs not concurre with the time of alienation but it is sufficient that he had it at the time of his death The estate to any of the three purposes ought to continue to the time of death and the Tenure must till after death to make it within the Statute and the estate also of Lands holden ought to continue after death therefore if Tenant in taile in Capite devise socage Land and dye without issue this is good so privity must continue after death therefore if he who made the conveyance be attainted this is out of the Statute The uses to the second Sonne are in contingency and not executed by 27. H. 8. by the power to make Leases and devise reserved to the feoffor and therefore the fee is in the feoffor in the meane time so that having disposed of it and being seised of it he cannot devise the Land purchased after It was Objected that the Statute saith lawfully executed in his life but here no use was to be executed in the second Sonne untill after his death It was Answered that after his death the uses were derived out of the feoffement and so are as it were executed in his life It was holden by the Chiefe Justice that the remainder to the second Sonne is contingent in regard no alienation is found to be made by the Eldest and if there had been then it would be repugnant that after alienation the Land should remaine to the second Sonne and so Quacunq via data the remainder as this Case is cannot vest in him but this point was not resolved by the Court. 2. The revocation is good although the Indenture precedeth the feoffement and that the uses are in contingency and that the revocation is but in part and the Chiefe Justice held that the Eldest Sonne had but a terme determinable and the second an estate taile But in this the Kings Bench and Common pleas differ in Opinion and that if Lands be devised to one and the Heires of his body for 500. yeares the Executors shall have it and not the Heire and the devisee may alien it for it cannot be intailed and so in Peacocks Case 28. Eliz. Banco Regis was it resolved Doctor Leyfields Case 8. Jacobi fol. 88. in Trespasse IN Trespasse for Corne taken at O. C. the Defendant pleads that Q. Eliz. granted the Rectory of O. C. to C. P. without shewing the Letters Patents who demised to G. P. for 8. yeares if the said C. P. so long live and that he as servant of G. P. tooke the Corne and avers the life of C. the Plaintiffe demurreth because the plea amounteth to the generall issue and it was adjudged in the K. Bench that the barre was insufficient because the Defendant shewed not the Letters Patents and Error was brought in the Exchequer-Chamber because the plea amounts to the generall issue because the Defendant gave no colour wherein judgement ought not to be given against the Defendant but onely to answer over 2. Because he is not bound to shew the Letters Patents It was answered that colour shall not be given for colour shall not be given where the plea goeth to the barre of the right for it would be in vaine to give colour of right and to barre him if he had right as if a collaterall warranty fine Statute be pleaded or if he claimes by a waife otherwise where he pleads a discent for this doth not barre the right but the possession he who claimes by sale in a Market overt shall not give colour if he pleads generally but if he pleads that I. S. was possessed as of his owne goods and sold them in a Market overt or waived them there he shall give colour because he confesseth no interest in the Plaintiffe 2. If the Defendant claimes by the Plaintiffe he shall not give colour 3. If the plea be to the Writ or action of the Writ no colour shall be given 4. Colour shall not be given in case of Tithes for to whomsoever the Lands belong the Tithes belong to the Parson 1. Colour ought to be a doubt to the Laygents 2. It must have continuance 3. It must be such a colour that if it be effectuall will maintaine the Action 4. It ought to be given by the first conveyance 2. Resolved Lessee for yeares of Lessee for life of the K. must shew the Letters Patents for he who is privy in estate or interest or who justifieth in right of a Party or privy although he claime but part must shew the first deed and the reason that deeds are shewed to the Court is that the Judges and Jury that which respectively to them belongs shall judge of the sufficiency thereof therefore a deed shall not be suffered to be given in evidence by Witnesses or Copy except it be burned
or some such inconvenience but a Copy of a record is good evidence if a release be made to Tenant for life this inureth to the reversioner yet he cannot pleade it without shewing a Fortiori here because the Lessee may contract with the Lessor to suffer him to have the deed to shew but Strangers who claime not the thing granted nor interest out of it need not to shew the deed otherwise if he claimes the thing granted or interest out of it Ergo the second grantee of a rent charge must shew the first grant but he who claimes as Gardian or meerly by the Law without privity or power of providing the deed need not to shew it But Tenant by the courtesie must shew it because the deed was in his power living the Wife otherwise of Tenant by Statute c. 3. The not shewing of the deed is matter of substance therefore judgement shall be given against the Plaintiffe in the Writ of Error although it was not shewed as Cause of Demurrer And judgement was affirmed Nota when a plea amounts to a generall issue if the Plaintiffe demurre specially upon 27. Eliz. and the Defendant joyne judgement shall be given for the Plaintiffe Edward Seymors Case 10. Jacobi fol. 95. THe Lord Cheyny Tenant in taile the remainder in taile to I. C. the reversion to the Lord C. bargaines and sells and levyes a fine to the bargainee with warranty to him and his Heires the bargainee nfeoffeth the Lord S. who infeoffeth E. S. I. C. dyes having issue T. the Lord C. dyeth without issue Edward Lord S. leaseth to the Plaintiffe the Defendant by the command of T. ejected him and judgement was given for the Defendant and affirmed in Error 1. Resolved the bargainee had an estate discendible during the life of the bargainor whereof his Wife shall have Dower and also the reversion in fee expectant upon the remainder in taile 2. The fine after bargaine and sale is not discontinuance of the remainder for this operates upon the estate passed by bargaine and sale and corroborateth that and maketh it determinable onely upon the death of the bargainor without issue otherwise if the fine had preceded the bargaine and sale 3. It was Objected that the feoffement of the bargainee displaceth the remainder so that the warranty which discends upon him barreth him But resolv that the warranty doth not bind him 1. Because it was annexed to an estate determinable by the death of Tenant in taile without issue and to the reversion in fee granted by bargaine and sale and fine and not to the remainder in taile and the Conisee by his owne Act cannot make it to extend any further therefore the estate taile being determined the warranty ceaseth 2. A warranty barreth not an estate which is not displaced at the time of the warranty annexed as if the Father maketh a feoffement of Land out of which his Sonne hath a rent with warranty this binds not the Sonne as to the rent 3. The feoffement was lawfull because he had fee therefore he cannot make discontinuance 4. A warranty cannot enlarge an estate the remainder in taile to I. C. was not discontinued for the feoffor was not then seised by force of the taile 5. A collaterall warranty may be given in evidence if it be not pleaded for although it giveth not a right yet it barreth anothers right and the rather in an Ejectione firmae and other personall actions because in them it cannot be pleaded by way of barre Note there are some Titles to which a warranty extendeth not as in case of Mortgage Mortmaine consent to a Ravishor for in these cases no Action lyeth in which Voucher or Rebutter can be neither shall a discent take away an entry Bewfages Case 10 Jacobi Common Pleas. fol. 99. THe Sheriffe upon a Fieri facias executed did take an Obligation of the Defendant to pay the money in Court at the returne of the Writ and this was adjudged good notwithstanding the Statute of 23. H. 6. Before this Statute the Sheriffe could not let any person to baile which was taken Ad respondend as may appeare Fitz. Na. br 25. a b. and in 34. Eliz. in Debt by Dawson Sheriffe of B. against Burnam upon an Obligation the Defendant pleaded the Statute 23. H. 6. and shewed that one K. recovered Debt and damages against him and pursued one Writ of Fieri facias against him directed to the Sheriffe of B. and that he made the Obligation to the Plaintiffe for the Execution and that the Obligation was void by the Statute whereupon the Plaintiffe demurred and it was resolved First that the Obligation was not within the Statute because that the Statute extended onely to such Obligations which any who is in their ward did make unto him Secondly that the same Obligation was not void at the Common Law whereupon the Plaintiffe had judgment and another judgement 28 El. Inter Burwey Kett upon an Obligation taken by the Sheriffe Pro solutione pecuniae debitae dominae reginae upon extent out of the Exchequer Now it is said in the later clause of the Act that if any of the Sheriffs or other Officers or Ministers aforesaid take any Obligation in other forme by colour of their Offices that it should be void c. There are two manner of formes Viz. Forma verbalis forma legalis for Verbalis stands upon the Letters and Sillables of the Act Forma legalis is Forma essentialis and stands upon the substance of the thing to be done and upon the sence of the Statute Quia notitia ramorum hujus Statuti non in sermonum folijs sed in rationis radice posita est and according to this distinction this Branch of this Statute is to be expounded and therefore in 37. H. 6. 1. If the Sheriffe take a single Obligation of one in his ward that was bailable this was void for this Obligation wants essentiall forme prescribed by the Statute for the condition prescribes the fault which is part of the substance And there Moyle said that if the Sheriffe let one to Baile or Mainprise that is excepted in the Statute and not mainpernable and take a simple Obligation that the same is void Quod alij Justiciarij concesserunt for by the exception it appeareth that it was not the intention of the Statute that such should be let to Baile and therefore the Obligation is taken in another sence then the Statute intends And it seemeth to me that as well in the same Case of 37. H. 6. as in the principall Case of Dive and Manningham plow 67. the Obligation which hath the condition to save the Sheriffe harmelesse when the Sheriffe against the Law letteth one to Baile who is not Baileable is against the Law and void by the Common Law And with this accordeth William Wishams Case 15. Eliz. Dyer 324. in 7. E. 4. One was in custody of the Sheriffe by force of a Capias upon an
but of payment of them notwithstanding the mistaking of the conclusion doth not vitiate the Count when the cause to have a prohibition is good 2. The plea of the Defendant to have a prohibition is not good because he traverseth the conclusion Viz. The prescription of discharge where he ought to traverse the prescription of unity for the conclusion is not traversable and because it is matter in Law 3. The issue is not well joyned 1. The matter of discharge is by reason of discharge by the Statute and the issue is by discharge at the common Law 2. In every issue there must be an affirmative and a negative but here is no affirmative for the conclusion is no affirmative but an inference 4. The impropriation is sufficient although the License were generall and the incumbent living for it shall be construed in such a speciall sence that it may take effect and the License is alwayes generall for the incumbent may dye or resigne before the impropriation 5. Admitting the impropriation void it had not beene made good by 35. Eliz. c. 3. for this settles in the K. all possessions of Abbeys with qualification notwithstanding any defect in any surrender c. which intitleth the K. and this defect is not within this qualification but if the impropriation had been good by reputation and so used this had beene given by the Statutes of 27. 31. H. 8. 6. If the Jury found matter to barre the Plaintiffe this is not to be regarded because an attaint lyeth not nor the Witnesses punished for perjury that matter not being materiall to the issue 7. Resolved that perpetuall unity untill the dissolution is by the Statute Prima facie a discharge of payment of Tithes except that the Fermors have paid Tithes and such an unity ought to be Justa aequalis that is fee in one and other Perpetua libera but if the Abbey were founded within time of memory he cannot at all and here it appeareth that the impropriation was made in 20. H. 8. so that it appeareth to the Court that before that the 20. acres were charged with Tythes for of common right all Lands ought to pay Tithes therefore the Chiefe Justice concluded that the said 20. acres as this Case is were chargeable with Tythes but in regard the information is good and the plea Pro consultatione habenda altogether insufficient and the Verdict impertinent to the issue they would not grant a consultation Doctor Grants Case 11. Jacobi Communi Banco fol. 15. In a prohibition 1. REsolved it is a good prescription that every Inhabitant in a Parish have paid 2. s. in the pound of the value of their houses per annum in Lieu of Tithes because it may have a lawfull comencement for it may be that this was so time out of mind for the Lands whereupon the Houses were built as a Modus decimandi 2. That the Parson may sue for it in the Court Christian for that it is in the nature of Tithes and every ancient City and Borough had for the most part such a custome for their Houses for the maintainance of their Parson and obvensions include oblations rents or other revennues and after a consultation was granted Sir Henry Nevills Case 11. Jacobi fol. 17. IT was resolved that a customary Mannor may be holden of another Mannor and there may be Lord Mesne and Tenant of it and such a customary Lord may hold Courts and grant Coppies and such a Mannor shall passe by surrender and admittance and fines shall be paid upon alienation or discent and if it be forfeited the Lord shall have the services as anexed to the Mannor so if Tenant at will c. admit Copy-holders reserving rent this shall goe with the Mannor after the will determined and so note a difference betweene reservations at the common Law and by the custome of the Mannor And it was said that the Mannor of Aylesham in Norfolke is holden by Copy and others in diverse other places And judgement was affirmed in Error Doctor Ayrayes Case 11. Jacobi fol. 18. 14. E 3. the K. Lycensed R. de E. to Found in Oxford a Hall sub nomine aulae Scholarium Reginae de Oxonio in the exemplification 8. Jac. it was Sub nomine aulae Reginae de Oxonio they present to the Church by the name of praeposit Coll. Reginae in Vniversitat Oxonio sociâ—r Schollar ejusdem the incumbent deviseth the Rectory and they by the name of praeposit Socior Scholar Aulae vel Collegij reginae in Vniversitate Oxonii confirme the demise and notwithstanding these variances it was adjudged that as well the confirmation as the presentation was good and the sole doubtfull variance is that it was Aulae Reginae where it ought to be Aulae Scholarium Reginae but good for the true name of the Colledge is so for the word Scholarium is not necessary but once and if it be taken in construction to come after Aulae the provost will be the sole Corporation by the name of praeposit Aulae Scholar reginae Ergo it doth precede in good construction Also the Founder named it so and so it hath beene alwayes taken and if there be a small variance this is not to the purpose if it be so described that another cannot be meant as a gift Omnibusfilijs I.S. or filiae I.S. when there is but one or if Richerus Abbot of W. grant by the name of Richardus Nil facit error nominis cum de corpore constat and this was the ancient and constant Opinion in Case of Corporations See the Case of the Major and Burgesses of Lin in the tenth Booke Henry Harpurs Case 12. Jacobi fol. 23. IN ejectione firme upon a Lease to J. W. in unam capellam and Land in W. in the Parish of B. and Tithes without shewing the certainty of them the Visne was from B. the Case was Sir H. B. seized of G. of the value of 30 l. per annum and of N. of the annuall value of 18 l. in capite covenanted to stand seized to the use of him and his Wife in taile with remainders in taile the reversion to himselfe and after purchaseth Lands in Socage and deviseth them to be sould by his Executors the matter in Law resolved but no judgement given because diverse exceptions taken c. 1. Resol That if tenant of the King in capite conveyes his Land to one of the uses c. and after purchase Socage he may devise all the Socage 2. A seck revertion upon an estate taile shall hinder the devise of Socage Land for a third part 3. Although the reversion in fee continue in him yet he may devise two parts of the Socage and all if he had granted the reversion over 4. Although he had exercised his power in making a Joynture of more then two parts yet if the reversion in fee had not hindred he might have devised all the Socage purchased after howsoever the
a Stranger be not in another part of the House but this was before 39. Eliz. cap. 15. whereby clergy is taken away without putting any feare if he rob any man of above the value of five shillings Accessory before in robbing a House in the day is ousted of Clergy by 4. 5. Phiâ— Mary Accessory in robbing a Booth in the night or day or out House upon 39. Eliz. shall have his Clergy Nota Although a Statute takes away Clergy from the principall yet the accessory before or after shall have it and where by statute for any offence a man is ousted of his Clergy the indictment must containe the offence with the circumstances in the Statute Dyer 99. and 183. And A. P. was ordered to be hanged in Chaines c. Metcalfs Case 12. Jacobi fol. 38. In Accompt IUdgement is given against M. Quod computet ideo in misericordia quia prius non computavit and before finall Judgement Error is brought 1. Resol It lyeth not 1. Because the Writ of Error saith Si juditium inde redditum sit which shall be intended of the principall Judgement as the Feast of St. M. shall be intended the principall Feast and the Feme shall be received upon default of her Baron after judgement of admeasurement before the principall judgement 2. It shall be intended an intire judgement therfore in an action against two if one plead to the issue and the other confesseth and judgement given against him he shall not have error before the Plea determined against the other for otherwise there would be a failer of right for the Kings Bench cannot proceed upon the Record nor the Common place because it is removed 3. The first judgement is not ad grave damnum for by that he looseth nothing but judgement of the arrearages and damages is the end of the originall 4. This is not properly a Judgement but an Award of the Court as ouster of ayde in partitione facienda an awarde quod partitio fiat c. which are but interlocutory and not definitive 5. They have day by the Roll untill the last judgment but if a Felon dye after the exigent awarded and before attainder a Writ of Error lyeth for necessity for otherwise his goods are forfeited by awarding of the exigent without remedy if diverse are sued by severall Praecipes and Judgement given against one he shall have error before judgement given against the other and if error be in the originall the tenor onely shall be certified for otherwise the Court cannot proceede against the others 2. It was Resolved That the Record is not removed because untill finall Judgement be given the Chiefe Justice of the Common place hath no authority to send it and they may proceed notwithstanding the Roll be marked Mittitur Richard Godfreys Case 12. Jacobi fol. 42. TWelve chiefe pledges according to the custome of the Mannor to present at the Leet that every one of themselves ought to pay for themselves 10 s. pro certo letae the Stewart imposeth a Fine of 6 l. upon them the Lord distreineth for the Fine and certainty of Leet one of the pledges brings Replevin and judgement was given for the Plaintiffe 1. Resol The Fine is not well assessed for it ought to be severall and not joynt as it is because the offence is severall and although that the offence be joynt yet the Fine shall be severall as in disseisin and trespasse But for the incertainty of the persons and infinitenesse of the number many may be fined together as a Towne for the escape of a Felon and the reasonablenesse and excessivenesse of the Fine shall be determined by the Judges Excessus in re qualibet jure reprobatur communi as excessive distresse excessive ayde and excessive amerciament are against the Common Law 2. If the Fine be imposed erroneously it may be avoyded by Plea for he had no other remedy 3. The Lord cannot distraine pro certo Letae without prescription because it is against common right but he may for a Fine or amercement but for an amercement in a Court Baron the Lord must prescribe a Fine because it is assessed by the Court needs not to be affered but an amercement must be affered by the Countrey 4 Admitting that he may distraine pro certo Letae he shall have a returne although hee had not cause to distraine for the Fine for where one brings an Action for two things and it will not lie for one of them it shall abate onely for that if he cannot have a better action for it but if he may it shall abate for the whole as in a Formedon of Land and of an advowson the Writ shall stand for the Land so if a man avow for diverse Rents arreare and it appeareth that parcell is not yet due yet the avowry is good for the residue but if a man bring a Writ of Entry in nature of an Assize of two Acres where it appeareth that for one Acre he ought to have a Writ of Entry in the per there all shall abate for this extends not to the action but to the Writ onely Richard Lifords Case 12. Jacobi fol 46. IN trespasse the Defendant pleads that J. L. was seized in fee and demised to T. S. and M. P. excepting Trees above twenty one yeares growth if not decayed for their lives and covenanted to stand seized de tenementis predictis cum pertinentijs superius dimissis to the use of R. L. in taile c. and the Defendant as Servant to the sayd R. L. entered and sold Trees and Judgement was given against the Plaintiffe 1. Resol That the Trees notwithstanding the exception remaine parcell of the inheritance and are not Chattels but shall descend to the Heire for the Law doth not favour severance of the Trees from the Land therefore if one bargaine and sell Land upon which there are Trees they shall not passe without inrolement 2. If there had not been such an exception the generall interest of them is in the Lessor and the Lessee had but a particular interest in them and the Lessor may sell them without license of the Lessee to take effect after the Lease determined and tithes shall not be payd for them because they are parcell of the inheritance 2. By the exception of them the soile is not excepted but onely so much as sustaineth the Tree and if he by licence of the lessee root them up the lessee shall have the soile but by exception of Wood the Land it selfe is excepted if an Acre or an advowson be severed from the Mannor by exception upon a Lease for life it shall not be parcell of the Mannor againe otherwise of trees for they were not severed in facto because they grow out of the Land 3. A thing in possession cannot be parcell of a reversion upon an estate for life but Trees which grow out of the Land and Fish or Deer in the Land may and shall passe with it
the Case lyeth for disparaging the Plaintiffes Title unto Lands Page 17 THE SECOND BOOKE AN illiterate man is not bound to seale a Deed without hearing the same read and Ignorantia facti may excuse but Ignorantia juris doth not Page 19 If a man plead that he hath kept I. S. indemnified he must shew how but not if he pleads in the negative Page 19 20 The Date of a Deed is not of the substance thereof Page 20 If a Deed be made by Menace it is avoidable by Plea ib. If it be read in other words then it is it bindeth not Page 21 But if he require it not to be read it shall bind him ib. Touching considerations to raise an use Page 21 Where an estate taile is barrable notwithstanding 34. H. 8. Page 22 A Lease by the Q. under the Exchequer Seale is good ib. What Act doth extinguish a Copy-hold Page 23 Things which lye in grant are effectuall by delivery of the Deed without other ceremony ib. Where the Habendum in a Deed is void and where voidable ib. A sale by the Bankrupt after a Commission awarded is void Page 24 13. Eliz. giveth benefit to such onely as comes in ib. The possession of the House is a good possession of the Lands also Page 25 What passeth by this word Cum pertinentijs ib. Where by a Deed Lands are granted Scituate in one place and they lye in another what passeth thereby ib. Where the Act of 34. H. 8. aideth a voidable grant Page 26 A. demiseth bargaines and sells to B. upon consideration for yeares and no Attornement to B. what passeth to him Page 27 Much learning of Elections ib. What Persons capable of Tithes at the Common Law Page 29 Where a man may prescribe to have Tithes appurtenant to a Mannor Page 30 Where a Religious House or Colledge is given to the K. by 1. E. 6. Page 31 Where a perpetuall unity dischargeth Tythes by 31 H. 8. or 1. E. 6. Page 32 Where a possibility shall make a grant good Page 33 Where a Tender upon a condition shall devest an estate Page 34 An estate of freehold cannot commence in Futuro Page 35 The Office of the premisses and Habendum ib. Where the Husband solely may declare the use of a fine of his Wifes Land and when it shall bind her and when not Page 36 Where a Variance in the Declaration avoideth all Page 37 What act of the feoffor dispenseth with a condition Page 38 Where a feoffee is disabled to performe a condition ib. An estate made to three and to the Heires of one the jointure continueth ib. A demise made by Baron and Feme without saying by Deed ib. Attornement of one Tenant for life to the grantee is good Page 39 Where one jointenant may prejudice another ib. In what clauses this word Proviso maketh a condition Page 40 By a fine levyed a condition is not extinct much good matter Page 43 Common assurances construed favourably ib. Where another use may be averred upon a fine upon grant and render or another consideration then is expressed Page 44 When a request is necessary and in what cases ib. The remainder to the right Heires of the Conisor is a reversion Page 45 Where a Donee in taile shall hold of no body Page 46 A man wounded upon the Sea dyes upon the Land unpunishable ib. The Law respects the Originall Act Page 47 THE THIRD BOOKE WHere a Writ of Error or right of Action is given to the King by 28. H. 8. Page 49 A diversity betweene inheritances and Chattells personall Page 50 Neither an Action without a Right nor a right without an Action shall make Remitter ib. A reversion upon an estate taile is out of the Statute of 9. R. 2. c. 3. Page 51 Where a grant from the Q. ought to haue precise words ib. A render to the Wife onely voidable where shee is not party Page 52 The Husband onely vouched where it barreth the remainder Page 53 A recovery against Tenant for life and he in remainder in taile shall not bind the taile Page 54 A grant of a Copy-hold for life is within 31. H. 8. of Monasteries ib. Excellent Rules for interpretation of all Statutes ib. What Statutes extend to Copy-holders and what not ib. Whether West 2. c. 1. extends to Copy-holds Page 55 Where the rents shall be intended to be the old rents Page 56 If the particular estate may determine before the remainder can comence what is become of it ib. In VVills the intent of the Devisor must be considered Page 57 Paying in a VVill where it is a condition and where a limittation ib. VVhere Debt lyeth for rent before the last day of payment Page 58 Three sorts of privities Page 59 Lessee assigneth Bargainee of the reversion shall not have Debt against the Lessee but the Lessor might Page 60 An Executor of a Termor not liable to Debt after Assignement ib. The Lessor may charge the Lessee or his Assignee Page 61 VVhere an estate may be waved in pays at the common Law and where by the Statute of 27 H. 8. of Vses Page 61 62 Much notable Learning upon the Statutes of 32. 34. H. 8. of VVills and of Relations and what inheritances are devisable Page 63 64. c. VVhere the second delivery of a Deed shall relate to the former Page 67 The severall sorts of custodies and Gardians Page 68 VVho shall have the custody of the Heire apparent an infant Page 68 69 The Mother shall have the custody c. within 4 5. Phil. Mar. c. 8. Jure naturae Page 69 Equally to be divided in a VVill and their construction Page 70 Excellent Learning of discents and of Possessio fratris ib. The Sheriffe is not bound to bring a prisoner in Recta linâ—a Page 71 VVhat Act is an escape and how prevented by the Sheriffe ib. A lease for three lives by a fine where within 11. H. 7. c. 20. Page 72 VVhat person may take advantage by entry within that Act ib. A VVoman accepts a fine and renders back for 1000. yeares it is within that Statute Page 73 A prisoner taken againe in Recenti insecutione is in Execution againe Page 73 An Action will lye against the Sheriffe before he be retaken ib. And after he is taken he shall be in prison againe ib. After a demurrer there shall be no repleader Page 74 Issue Tenant in taile suffers a recovery the Mother releaseth with warranty this is not within 11. H. 7. Page 74 75 Otherwise if the Wife had released after the death of the issue Page 76 An estate transferred in the Post before the warranty discend Page 77 The Lessor having cause of entry but no notice accepts rent ib. The Lessor may have debt after a reentry Page 78 A Lease for yeares is not made good by acceptance if the condition be to be void othewise of a Lease for life ib. Acceptance and an acquittance barreth all former
Banco fol. 7. IF one be barred by plea to the Writte hee may have the same Writte againe if by plea to the action of the Writte he may have his right action If the plea be to the action and he be barred by Judgement upon demurrer confession or verdict in personall actions it is a barre for ever and in reall actions he is put to a Writte of higher nature as barre in assize barreth one in Entry in nature of an assize but he may have an assize of Mortdaumester c. But barre is not perpetuall if those who are barred have not the meere right therefore the heire in taile who is barred shall have the same action so of the successor of a Parson if he doth not pray in ayde of the Patron and Ordinary He who lost by default before the Statute of Westminster 2. cap. 4. was put to a Writte of right and if he could not have this Writte he was without remedy In case where a Writte of Entry in the post lyeth now no remedy was before the Statute of Marlebridge cap. 29. but a Writte of right See there divers inconveniences which insue upon the breach or alteration of the auncient and fundamentall rules of the Common Law Interest Reipublicae ut sit finis litium Where a Writte shall be brought by Journeys accounts Spencers case 45. Eliz. Com. Banco fol. 9. IF a formedon abate for undue summons the demandant may have another by Journeys accompts 1. Resol If a Writte abate by default of the demandant himselfe he shall not have another Writte by Journeys accompts otherwise it is if by default of the Clerke or Sheriffe as in this case If a Writte abate for nontenure of all he shall not have c. but if a Praecipe abate for non-tenure of parcell he shall have another so if it abate for joyntenancy of part of the demandant he shall not have a new Writte because he had notice otherwise it is of the part of the tenant And this Writte shall be alwayes betwixt the parties to the first Writte and of the same quantity of acres A Judiciall Writte shall never be sued by Journeys accompts because it shall never abate for forme 2. The second Writte is quasi a continuance of the first Writte therefore all pleas which relate to the purchase of the Writte shall be pleaded from the purchase of the first Writte and costs of the first Writte shall be recovered 32. E. 3. Journeys accompts 16. 15. dayes were allowed Jentlemans case 25. Eliz. concerning Judges of Courts fol. 11 IN the Hundred Courts the Sutors are Judges in the Court of Pypowders the Steward is Judge In a Leet the Steward is Judge In a Court Baron the Sutors which are by the common Law are Judges Rex sectatoribus Curiae c. Vobis mandamus c. ad judicium reddendum c. procedatis but in Redisseisin the Sheriffe is Judge by the Statute of Merton cap. 3. and in the Tourne Morrices case 27. Eliz. Com. Banco fol. 12. IT was adjudged that after the act of 28. H. 8. ca. 1. although joyntenants be compellable to make partition by Writte as well as Copartners yet they may not make partition by words as Copartners may doe by the common Law If two joyntenants make partition by Writte the warranty remaineth otherwise it is if it be by deed by Consent Cases of pardon 29. Eliz. fol. 13. BVrton Parson of Isbock in Leic was deprived Anno 12. El. for committing Adulterie and after by the generall pardon 2. Apr. 13. El. the offence of adulterie in t alia was pardoned before the 14. of February then last past And it was said that before the pardon that crimen adulterij praed transivit in rem judicatam and therefore the sentence should remaine in force And therefore untill the sentence were reversed the deprivation was in force But it was resolved that Burton by vertue of the said pardon is become Parson againe without any sentence declaring the said deprivation to be voyde For by the pardon the adultery which was the cause of the sentence is discharged and by consequence all that which did stand or depend upon the same foundation is also discharged vide 20. El. Dier A. was bound in a Statute of 20. li. to B. B. sued Execution and the Lands of A. were delivered in Execution and after B. maketh Defeasance to A. by Indenture that if A. doe pay to B. 8. li. at a certaine day that then the Statute to be voyde And it was adjudged that although the Statute was executed yet the Defeasance of the Statute was sufficient in Law to defeate as well the Statute as the Execution thereof For the Statute is the foundation of all and if that be defeated all that is builded on the same shall be defeated also 20. ass pla 7. Burglary was excepted out of the generall pardon of 28. Eliz. by that the attainder of burglary is excepted for the offence remaines after judgement and is the foundation of it Arundells case 36. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 14. AN Inditement of murther in King-streete in W. and the visne from W. and it was vitious for it ought to be from the most certaine place that is the Parish for W. being a Citie it shall be intended that it is greater then the Parish and therefore a new Venire facias was awarded Treports case 36. El. Banco Regis fol. 14. A. Tenant for life remainder in fee to B. both by Deed indented joyne in a Lease to Treport the question was whether the same shall be adjudged in Law the Lease of both of them or not And it was resolved that it was the Lease of A. during his life and the confirmation of B. And after the death of A. it was the Lease of B. and the confirmation of A. and because the plaintiffe had declared of a joynt demise of A. and B. it was adjudged against the plaintiffe in an Ejectione firmae If tenant for life and he in remainder joyne in a Lease rendring rent tenant for life shall have the rent during his life Edens case 37. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 15. RIens passa by Letters patents shall be tryed where the Land is not where the patent beares date for the Patent is not traversed but the effect of the issue is whether the Queene had the said Land to grant or not Colyers case 37. Eliz. Com. Banco fol. 16. ONe demiseth to his daughter for life and after to his brother paying 20. s. to J. S. the brother had fee for the summe to be paid by him for otherwise he may pay the 20. s. and die without satisfaction but if the payment be to be made out of the profits of the Land he shall have but for life for there he can be at no prejudice Wyldes case 41. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 16. A Man deviseth Lands to the husband and the wife and to the children of their bodies