if A. dies his Executors not his Heirs shall have it for it is no Inheritance Or if such a Termer grant a Rent out of the Land to A. and his Heirs or the Heirs Male of his body yet shall it go to the Executor not to the Heir for it being derived out of a Chattel it self remains a meer Chattel and becomes not any Inheritance Also if a Rent be granted out of Land to one in Fee-Simple Fee-Taile for Life or Years and it be not paid to him in his life-time the Arrerages shall go to his Executor not to his Heir Or if a man seized of Land and possessed of a stock of Cattel Let it for Years and Covenant with the Lessee that he pay to Him and his Wife their Heirs and Assigns one hundred pound per annum during the Term in this Case after the death of the Lessor his Wife surviving him her Executor and not his Heir shall receive this payment Again if A. grant the next Presentation of the Church of B. unto D. In this Case if D. dies his Executor shall have it as a Chattel Not the Heir Or if A. grant a Lease for years of Land to D. and his Heirs and dies his Executor and not his Heir shall have this Term. And if A. possessed of a Term of years of Land grant it by Deed or give it by Will to D. and his Heirs or to D. and his Heirs Males or devise it by Will to B. for life the remainder to D. and his Heirs in these Cases D. shall have these Terms of years as Chattels and after his death his Executor shall have them Also if a Lessee for life make a Lease for years absolutely This in Law is a Lease for so many years if the life live so long and shall go to the Executor after his death And if one makes a Feoffment in Fee of Land the Feoffee covenanting to do divers things to the Feoffor and to forfeit five pound to him and his Heirs as oft as he shall fail performance and the Feoffee doth fail and break his Covenant divers wayes and the Feoffor dieth in this case his Executor not his Heir shall have and recover all the Forfeitures that are past and unpaid Also if any Goods or Chattels be granted to any Heads of Bodies Politick and their Successors their Executors and not their Successors shall have them In like manner if a Lease for years be made to a Bishop and his Successors and he die his Executor not his Successor is to have it 4. Among the living Chattels Personal that go to the Executor may be comprehended an Apprentice for years the interest of a Debtor in Execution for debt and in a Prisoner taken Jure belli Also Cattel of all kind yea and Fishes in a Pond Conies in a Warren Deer in a Park Pigeons in a Dove-house where the Testator was but a Termer or Lessee thereof for then they are to go to his Executor as Accessory Chattel following the State of their Principal viz. the Pond Warren Park and Dove-house Or if the Conies Pigeons or Deer were all tame they are then likewise to go to the Executor and not to the Heir so likewise are Hawkes reclaimed yea it is felony to steal Hawkes young in the Nest which implyes that they are Goods and belong to the Executor 5. Chattels Personal without life and moveable as all Householdstuff Implements and Utensils Money Plate Jewels Corn Pulse Hay Wood felled Wares Merchandise Ships Carts Plows Coaches c. are evident to belong to the Executor not to the Heir And generally all things sowed and not arising from the Earth without manuring go to the Executorsâ— and such things as grow of themselves to the Heir therefore Corn in the field growing or standing shall go to the Executor Also Hops though not sowen if planted likewise Hemp and Saffron do like Corn growing pertain to the Executor Also after Corn reaped and before the Tythes set out the Inheritor of the Tythes dying his Executor and not his Heir seems to have the best right to the Tythe after set out Also things above ground in Gardens as Mellons of all kind and the like go to the Executor not to the Heir as also all other things as have such a yearly setting or manurance as severs them in interest from the soile Also the Writings and Evidences that concern not the inheritance but only Leases Terms Goods Chattels or Debts pertain to the Executor If one that holdeth Land for the Life of A. B. sow the Land and A. B. happen to die ere it be ripe and cut and he that so holdeth the Land happen to die also before it be ripe the Executor of the Tenant shall have the Corn. And if the Tenant in Tayl sow the Land he doth so hold and die ere it be cut the Executor not he in Reversion nor the Heir nor the Issue in Tayl shall have it Also if A. make a Feoffment of Land to B. excepting the Trees thereon which he afterwards grants to B. for years in this Case the Trees are in the nature of a Chattel and if B. dies his Executor shall enjoy them Or if A. seized in Fee of Lands whereon Trees grow sell these Trees to B. who then dies before they be felled in this Case the Executor or Administrator of B. shall have them and may sell or cut them down Lastly The Executor without contradiction of the Heir may in any convenient time after the Testators death enter into the house descended to the Heir for the removing and taking away of the Goods so as the door be open or at least the key be in the door but he cannot justifie the breaking open of the door of any Chamber to take Goods thence But if the Goods be not removed in convenient time the Heir may distrain them as Dammage Fesante 6. If a Lease for years be made to a Bishop and his Successors and he die his Executor not his Successor is to have it If a Presentment to a Church happen to a Tenant in Tayle and he die before he Presents his Executor not his Issue in Tayle shall Present because the Chattel is not devested Likewise if a Termer have a Presentment which doth happen during the Term though he do not Present yet he shall have it If a Parson Vicar Master of a Hospital or any Body Politick be possessed of any Goods or Chattels in their own Right and die they shall go to their Executors or Administrators not to their Successors If a Lease be made for years or the next Advowson of a Church or Covenant for payment of money or the like be granted or an Obligation made to one and to his Heirs In all these Cases he hath this as a Chattel and it shall go to his
or Years and therefore the whole shall pass to the Devisee A Man possessed of a Term of Years Devised the same in these words viz. The residue of my Goods Moveable and Immoveable I give to my Son John whom I make my Executor and to him I give my whole Years that I have in my Farm of M. and if he die I give it to my Daughters John the Executor and Devisee proveth the Will claiming the Lease according to the Will and dyeth Intestate His Administrator for good Consideration Selleth the Lease that remains Whence the doubt or Question was whether the Daughters or the Assignee should have the Lease The Case was referr'd to the Two Chief Justices and Justice Walmesley who all agreed That the Assignee should enjoy the Lease and not the Daughters Q. Whether a Devise to them in such manner be void One made a Lease for life after Leased the same to A. for 99. Years if he so long lived to Commence after the decease of the Lessee for life And if A. dyed during the said Term of 99. Years or the Lease otherwise determined and after the death of the Lessee for life then the Lessor granted for him and his Heirs that the Land should remain to the Executors of A. for 20. Years Lessee for life dyes A. Leased for 20. Years Rendring Rent and dyes Intestate B. takes his Administration and brings Action of Debt for the Rent It was Adjudged That it doth not lye for it seem'd to Gaudy and Yelverton That the Contingent of 20. Years was never Vested in A. But if A. had made Executors he might take by way of Purchase Executors being in name of Purchase As in Cranmers Case 14. Eliz. Dyer But if it had been limited to the Executors for Payment of the Debts of A. or the like then by the intent apparent there would be an Interest in A. and in the Executor for the use of A. as Popham and Fenner agreed in point of Law as to an Action of Debt A Man made his Will in this manner viz. I have made a Lease for 21. Years to I. S. paying but 20 s. Rent And it was held That it was a good Lease by the Will For that Word I have shall be taken in the Present Tense as is the word Dedi in a Deed of Feofment A Man Seised of a Mannor part in Demesnes and part in Lease upon Rent Suit and Service Devised by his Testament to his Wife during her life all his Lands in Demesnes and also by the same Testament did Devise to her all his Services and high Rents for 15. Years and further by the same Testament did Devise all his Mannor to another after the death of his Wife And it was Agreed by all the Justices That the last Devise took not effect for any part of the Mannor till after the death of the Wife and that the Heir after the Expiration of the 15. Years and during the Wives life shall have the Services and Chief Rents If a Man possessed of a Lease for Years of Land Devise the same to one for Life the Remainder to another although the first Devisee hath the whole Estate or Term in him and no Remainder can depend thereon at Common Law yet it is a good Devise to the second Devisee by way of an Executory Devise If certain Lands be Devised to one he cannot take them without the delivery of the Executor Or if a Man be possess'd of a Lease for Years of Land and Devise the same to another the Devisee cannot have it or enter upon it without the Executors or Administrators Consent CHAP XIII Law-Cases touching Devises of Reversions or Remainders 1. What Devise of a Reversion is good and what Remainder may be Devised 2. As the Limitation so the Devise of a Remainder after a Fee is void 3. In what Case the Devise of a Remainder of a Chattel-real may be void 4. The Devise of a void Limitation is a void Devise 5. A Devise in Remainder of Goods is void 6. In what Case the Devise of a Remainder over in Fee after Lease for Life made by Executors is void 7. The Difference between a Remainder Entail'd by Devise and Entail'd by Deed. 8. A Remainder Devised to a Church accrews to the Parson of that Church 9. A Refusal in one to take by a Devise shall not prejudice another in Reversion or Remainder 10. How the Devisors Daughters Issue without naming her shall have the Devised Remainder before the Issue of his Sons 11. A Termer of a 100. Years to come Deviseth it to one for Life the Remainder over it is a void Remainder 12. A Devise of a Remainder in Fee after a Lease which Devise is made by him in Remainder is a void Devise if the Lessor Re-enter 13. Several Cases wherein he in Remainder may Devise his Remainder 14. Fee-simple Devised to one the Remainder cannot be Devised to another albeit the first Devise were but Conditional 15. A Term of Years by way of Remainder is Devisable but a Devise by way of Entail with Remainder over is void 16. Lessor may Devise the Reversion of Land for Life notwithstanding a Feofment in Fee 17. Remainder of a Rent-charge in Fee may be Devised to one where the Land out of which the Rent doth arise is Devised to another 18. A Devise may be good for the Reversion of a Term where not for the Rent 19. The Devise of a Remainder may be good where yet an Estate Tail shall precede 20. He in Remainder shall take presently where the Devisee for Life is incapable of taking by Devise 21. Though a Man cannot Devise to himself yet he may Devise a Remainder to his own right Heirs 22. A Man may Devise a Reversion by the Name of all his Inheritance or Hereditaments 23. Devises of Remainders to the next of Blood 24. Where the Devise of a Remainder after the Remainder makes the former Remainder but an Estate for Life 1. IF a Man Devise his Land to B. C. for life the Remainder to the next of Kin or next of Blood of B. C. this is a good Devise of a Remainder Or if a Lessor Disseiseth his Lessee for life and makes a Lease for life to another for Term of life of the first Lessee the Remainder over in Fee though the first Lessee enters yet he in the Remainder may Devise his Remainder 2. If one Devise his Lands to A. so as he render 20 s. per annum to B. and if he fail thereof then his Estate to cease and to remain to B. this Devise is good but the Limitation of the Remainder is void because a Remainder cannot be limited after a Fee Therefore if a Man makes a Lease for Years upon Condition that if the Lessor disturb the Lessee within the Term that the Lessee shall have the Fee and maketh Livery accordingly and after the Lessor doth disturb the Lessee for
made his Testament in writing and Devised the Mannor to his Wife for the Term of 30. Years in these words viz. For and to these Intents and Purposes following viz. I will and my mind and intent is That B. my Wife shall yearly Content and Pay out of the Issues and Profits of the said Mannor to Sir A. I. and others 30 l. And further Wills That the other Legacies given in his Will should be paid by her and therein Devised divers Legacies And further Willed That his Wife should be bound to Sir A. and others for the performance of his Will F. C. the Devisor dies the Wife enters on the Land c. takes the Profits and thereof pays the Legacies but not to Sir A. and others c. Whereupon the Heir Enters as for breach of Condition It was held by the Justices that it was no Condition but a Declaration of the Testators intention for to what end or purpose should the Wife be bound if it were a Condition But Judgment was not given in the Case for the Parties agreed CHAP. XV. Touching Devises of Rents 1. Rents Issuing out of Lands are as Devisable as the Land it self so as it be the Testators own Land 2. A Grantee may not Devise the Rent which he hath only for another Mans Life 3. Rent to be Issuing out of a Common is not Devisable 4. Several ways how Rents may be Devised 5. The Devise of the Reversion of a Rent upon a false suggestion is a void Devise 1. A Seigniory Rent or the like is Devisable as Land is and will pass without the Atturnment of the Tenant So that a Man may Devise a Rent de novo issuing out of Land or a Rent issuing out of Land that is in esse before And therefore if one make a Lease for Life or Years Rendring Rent the Lessor may Devise this Rent Likewise if a Rent be granted to one and his Heirs the Grantee may Devise this Rent Also a Man that is Seised of Land in Fee may Devise any Rent out of it at his pleasure But a Man cannot Devise a Rent out of another Mans Land that is none of his own nor out of that which he hath not and therefore if one Devise Twenty Pounds to be issuing out of his Mannor of Dale when in Truth he hath no such Mannor that Devise is void 2. If Rent be granted to one Man for the life of another it seems the Grantee may not Devise this Rent but that on failure of other disposal thereof in the Grantees life Time the Terre-tenant shall hold it as an Occupant And if one Devise a Rent of any certain Sum out of his Land to be paid quarterly and say not how long the Rent shall continue this is but an Fstate for life of that Rent 3. If a Man Seised of a Common granteth a Rent out of the Land although that the Land be Devisable yet the Grant is void and by Consequence the Devise 4. If a Tenant for life make a Lease for Years Rendring Rent and after the Tenant for life Surrender to the Lessor all his Right and then the Lessor Devise this Rent this is a good Devise during the life of the Lessee for life Or if a Man make a Lease for life Reserving Rent to him and his Heirs and the Lessor Devise this Rent this also is a good Devise of the Rent otherwise it is if he Reserve the Rent to him and his Assigns Or if a Lessee for Term of Ten Years make a Lease over for Term of 40. Years and the Lessor confirm the Estate Reserving a Rent to him and his Heirs and after by his Will Devise the Rent in Fee this also is a good Devise of the Rent after the Ten Years but not before 5. A Man Seised of a Rent makes a Deed reciting that whereas I. S. holdeth the said Rent of his Grant for Term of life he grants the Reversion of the said Rent after the decease of I. S. to the Grantee and his Heirs in Fee and in Truth I. S. had nothing in the Rent the Grantee Deviseth this Rent this is no good Devise of the Rent If the Husband make a Leafe for life to the Daughter and Heir apparent of his Wife being Covert Rendring Rent and the Wife-Mother die and the Husband Devise the Rent this is a void Devise of that Rent In an Action of the Case upon Trover the Defendant justified and pleaded Rent granted to A. his Executors and Assigns for the life of B. out of Black-acre and shewed that A. was dead and that he as Administrator to A. distrayned for the Rent on Black-acre in Arrears after the death of A. and that he is to have it during the life of B. It was Adjudged That the justification was not good either for matter or manner for that after the death of A. the Rent determined and cannot come to his Executors or Administrators for it was not a Thing Testamentary but a Frank-tenement and nothing in the Grant to A. and his Heirs for the others life If Rent be granted out of Land Devisable by Custom the Rent may be Devised within the Custom for it is of the same nature with the Land CHAP. XVI Of Devises touching the Sale of Land by Executors or others 1. The mean Profits of Lands Devised to be sold are not Assets in the Executors hands unless the Testator shall specially so Appoint it 2. The Heir and not a stranger though appointed in the Devise shall take the advantage of a Breach of Condition annexed to a Devise touching sale of Lands 3. Where the Executors have only an Authority and not an Interest in the Lands Devised to be sold the Heir of the Devisor shall have the mean Profits thereof till it be sold 4. Otherwise where the Executors have an Interest in which case the Money or Proceed upon the sale but not the mean Profits shall be Assets in their hands 5. Several Devises touching sales of Land with or without the Assent of another 6. By the word Appurtenances shall pass in a Devise Lands commonly used with a Messuage 7. A Copy-holders Case of Devise of Land to his Wife 8. Where one who hath but an Estate for life and no Interest to sell may yet have an Authority to Appoint who shall sell the Lands Devised 9. In what Case relating to this matter a Prohibition may Lye or not 10. A Case of Law wherein one Executor alone where there are two can not sell the Land Devised 11. How a sale of Lands Devised to be sold may be void for want of sufficient Authority 12. In what case a Sale of Lands Devised to be sold may be made by one Executor where there are two Appointed by Name 13. Where there is an Interest as well as an Authority and Trust the Executor of the surviving Executor may sell the Lands of the first Testator Devised to be sold 14.
part not expressed is a Moiety implyed p. 293. § 23. p. 310. § 11. p. 441. § 49 50. Paying In what Sense that word shall be construed only as a Limitation not as a Condition p. 267 268. § 5. Payment not full in what case Equivalent to none at all p. 289. § 11. PiousVses Testaments to that end their Priviledges p. 8. § 4. Poor disagreement among the DD. touching Legacies to the Poor in such generall words p. 291. § 18. Pope whether he may alter the Wills of Testators p. 149. § 107. Portion of Goods not expressing what proportion Bequeathed signifies 〈◊〉 Mâ—ity p. 447. § 100. Portions or Filiall Portions the Law in that case p. 167 c. Possibilities in Expectation are Devisable as well as Possessions in Actual Demes 〈…〉 es p 311 § ult Presentations void not Devisable p 288 § 5. To whom belongs the Presentation in case of Intestation p 82 § 6. Prisoners In what Sense said to be Intestable or not p 15 § 3. Priviledged Testaments what the severall kinds thereof p. 7 § 1. Probate of Testaments the Law thereof when where how by and before whom with the Fees thereof p. 35 c. In what case the Executor may be compelled to Prove the Will notwithstanding his former refusall and thereupon Letters of Administration granted to another p. 165 § 2. What Proof Requisite for the Probate of a Will p. 40. c. Prohibition in what Cases it doth not lie p 113 § 7. In what Cases touching Lands Devised to be Sold a Prohibition may lie or not p 275 § 9. It doth not lie in case of the Husbands Release for the Wives Legacy p. 282 § ult R. Recovery by Fraud against an Executor no Plea in Barre to a just Debt p 108 109 § 7. Refusalls to Prove the Will p 39 40 § 6. How to Proceed in case of Refusall of Executorship p. 91 92 § 1. It is no absolute Barre to a Subsequent Administration p Ibid. § 3. It may be done by a Letter Extrajudicially as well as by a Judiciall Act. p 93 § ult How Refusers to Administer may yet afterwards be admitted or excluded p. 163 § ult Refusall in one to take by a Devise shall not prejudice him in Reversion or Remainder p 263. § 9 13. Release or Discharge in what Sense it may be said to be Bequeathed p 322 § 3 p 439 § 32. To Release is a good word to Devise Lands by p 235 in fin A Release of Actions by an Administrator whose Letters of Administration are after Revoked is void p 216 § ult Action for Executors upon a a Release p. 103. § ult Remainders and Reversions Devised p 261 c. What of that kind may be Devised p Ibid § 1. Remainders and Cross-Remainders by Devise of Estate Tail p 252 § 11. With Implyed Remainders Ibid § 12. Remainders Entail'd by Devise and by Deed how they differ p 262 § 7. Remainders Devised to a Church accrews to the Parson thereof Ibid. § 8 He in Remainder or Reversion shall not be prejudiced by the Refusall of him that should take by a Devise p 263 § 9 13. How the Issue of the Daughters without naming them shall have the Devised Remainder in preference to the Issue of the Sons Ibid. § 10. Several Cases wherein he in Remainder may Devise his Remainder p Ibid. § 13. Reversion of Land for life may be Devised by the Lessor notwithstanding a Feoffment in Fee p 264 § 16. Remainder of a Rent-charge is Devisable to one where the Land out of which it arises is Devised to another Ibid. § 17. A Devise may be good for the Reversion of a Term where it is otherwise for the Rent p 264 § 18. Remainder Devised may be good where yet an Estate Tail precedes Ibid. § 19. He in Remainder may instantly take where the Devisee is incapable Ibid. § 20. Remainder may be Devised by one to his own right Heirs Ibid. § 21. Reversion may be Devised by the name of all a Mans Inheritances or Hereditaments p. 265 § 22. Remainder Devised to the next of Blood Ibid. § 23. In what case Remainder after Remainder makes the former Remainder but an Estate for Life p. Ibid. § 24. Remainders Devised what void p 261. § 2 p 262 § 3 to 6 p 264 § 15. A Hundred Years to come Devised for Life the Remainder over is a void Remainder p. 263 § 11. Remainder in Fee after a Lease Devised by him in Remainder is a void Remainder if the Lessor Re-enter Ibid § 12. Remainder after a Fee Devised is Indeviseable albeit such Devise were but Conditional p 263 § 14. A Term of Years by way of Remainder is Devisable but a Devise by way of Entail with remainders over is void p Ibid § 15. Rents Devised p 270 c. As Devisable as the Land itself Ibid § 1. They are Devisable for another mans life Ibid § 2. Rents issuing out of a Common not Devisable § 3. Several ways of Devising Rents § 4. Reversion of Rents Devised upon a false suggestion a void Devise p 271 § 5. Rent Devised in what case the Land it self doth thereby pass p 138 § ult What Rent not Devisable p 225 § 2. In what case the Rent is due to the Heir not to the Executor p 103 104 § ult Rent due to the Executors of the Husband of the Tenant in Dower Ibid. Rent of Land in Fee received by Executors no Assets because belonging to the Heir p 85 § 3. The Land-lords Rent is payable by the Executor for the Ground whose fruit for the Term may be Devised to another p 298 § 46. Residue of a Term is as Devisable as the Term it self p 258 § 7. Residuary-Regatary hath an Advantage when others Refuse p. 291 § 17. Retainer of a Testators Goods by an Executor to pay himself good p 133 § ult p 149 § ult Reviver of a Will Revoked p. 34 § 1. Revocations Testamentary the severall kinds thereof p 31 § 1. Revocations by Marriage Ibid § 2. Revocation of a Will by a Wife after Marriage whether good or not p. 236 § ult Whether Revocation of Administration may without any Sentence in Court be by the Bishop who granted it p 166 167 § ult Revocations of Legacies and Devises p 331 c. What amounts to a Revocation of a Devise of Land p 228 in fin Severall Cases in Law touching what shall amount to a Revocation or Countermand of a Legacy or Devise p. 443 § ult Four Cases wherein Legacies are irrevocable p 443 § 74. S. Sale of Lands Devised to be made by Executors p 273 c. with or without the Assent of others p 274. § 5. In what case it may or not be by one alone where there are Two or more Executors p 275 276 § 10 12. How it becomes void for want of sufficient Authority p 175 § 11. In what Case it may be made by
out the Executor unless the money for the Land to be sold be to be distributed in pios usus because in this Case the Frank-tenement after the Testators death is in the Executors not in the Heir for which reason the Heir cannot enter in this Case as he might in the former 3. In an Action of Debt brought against Executors They were at Issue if Assets were in their hands or not and the Jury found by a Special Verdict That the Testator was seized of a House in Fee and made a Lease thereof and of certain Implements of household in it for years rendring Rent to Him his Heirs and Assigns and found that the Executors after the death of the Testator continually received the Rent and prayed Advice of the Court if the same were Assets in the Executors hands And the Opinion of the Court was That it was not Assets for that the whole Rent was to go with the Land in Reversion as magis digne and so did belong to the Heir not the Executors A man Willeth that after twenty years after the death of the Devisor J. S. shall have the Land in Fee the Heir of the Devisor shall have the Land during the Term and not the Executor CHAP. XV. What goes neither to the Heir nor Executor and in what Cases 1. Bona Paraphernalia go neither to the Heir nor to the Exeeutor 2. Things in joynt-Tenancy go neither to the Heir nor to the Executor 3. Things willed by the Testator to be sold for certain uses go to neither of them 4. A Lease simply for Three Lives goes neither to the Heir nor Executor 1. BY the Civil Law those Goods belonging to the Wife called Bona Paraphernalia descend neither to the Heir nor to the Executor neither are they by that Law subject unto the payment of the Husbands debts But now under that notion of Bona Paraphernalia we are not to understand the Wifes Apparel with her Bed Jewels and Ornaments for her person to be comprehended but her convenient Apparel and onely such as is agreeable to her degree and such shall go to the Wife onely the rest unto the Executor And thus much the very word being Etymologized doth imply 2. The Goods and Chattels which one hath in Joynt-Tenancy with another shall not on his death go to his Executor nor to his Heir but to the other surviving Joynt-Tenant and that by right of survivorship Otherwise it is with Tenants in common for if A. and B. have Goods or Chattels in Joynt-Tenancy and if either of them grant what belongs to him unto a Third person in this Case that Third person and he which kept his part unsold are Tenants in Common and therefore if either of them Two die the deceaseds part of such Goods and Chattels shall go to his Executor and not to the surviving Tenant in Common Also if Husband and Wife be Joynt-Tenants of Land and the Husband die the very Corn growing thereon shall survive to her together with the Land and though the Husband sowed it yet shall it not go to his Executor 3. The Monies or Profits arising out of Lands Willed by the Testator to be sold are not accounted as any of the Goods or Chattels of the person deceased and consequently do go neither to the Heir nor to the Executor but to the uses for which it was willed to be sold 4. If one have a Lease simply for Three Lives to him and his Assigns this is no Chattel therefore shall not go to the Executor and it is no Land therefore it shall not go to the Heir but in this Case it shall go to him who first after the Testators death Enters and Claims it as an Occupant if no assignment thereof be made in the life-time of the Lâ—ssee But a Lease for years determinable upon Lives is a Chattel and shall go to the Executor So also doth an Extent upon a Statute CHAP. XVI Of the Indivisibility of the right and interest of Co-Executors Their Indivisibility 1. In point of Power and Authority 2. In point of Interest and Possession 3. In Case of Plaintiffs and Defendants 1. WHere there are more Executors than One or Joynt-Executors to the same Testator One of them cannot give nor release his Interest to the other or if he doth it is void and he who so releaseth shall still have as much Interest as he to whom he released because each had the whole before Therefore if one Executor release but his part of a debt it hath been held that the whole is discharged But if one Executor alone sell Goods of the Testator he alone may maintain an Action of debt for the money So if Goods be taken out of the possession of one Executor he alone may maintain an Action for the same and that without naming himself Executor Also one Executor not joyning in suit with another may any time before judgment release but after Judgement he cannot because then it is altered in nature and turn'd into Rem Judicatam And though many Executors to one and the same Testator make but one Executor yet the devastation wast or misdoing of one shall not charge the rest nor make their Goods lyable for recompence but himself shall answer for it with his own Goods yet no further than the value of the Testators Goods so wasted or misadministred 2. If one of the Executors where there be Two or more grant his part of the Testators Goods all passeth and nothing is left to the other for that each hath the whole and there be no Parts or Moities between Executors Thus if an Horse come to four Executors each hath a Horse and yet all four have but one Also though a Lease for One thousand Years of One thousand Acres of Land come to Two Executors or more no partition or division can be made between them because it is not between them as between joynt-Lessees of Land where each hath but a Moitie in Interest though possession of and through the whole but among Executors each hath the whole and therefore if he grants his part he grants the whole yet one Executor may demise or grant the Moitie of the Land for the whole term and so may the other and this way they may settle a Moitie for each in some Third person intrusted for them but one Executor cannot make a Lease to the other of any part because he had the whole before nor can one of them Sue the other as Executor unless the Testator devise to one of his Executors all his Goods after such Debts and Legacies paid and satisfied for in such Case after satisfaction thereof that Executor may take the remainder of the Goods and maintain an Action of Trespass against the other if he take them from him and consequently an Action of Detinue if he keep or detain them but this he may do not as
or Keyes nor Fishes in the Pond nor Doves in Dove-houses scituate in Lands belonging to the Heir Nor Bona Paraphernalia that is the Wives convenient Apparel suitable to her Degree For as they are not to be put into the Inventory of her Husbands Goods so neither are they liable to the payment of his Debts But the Wives Jewels Chains and Borders and other Rich Ornaments of her Person are to be put into the Inventory of her deceased Husbands Goods Also Debts due to the Testator are to be put into the Inventory But Monies raised upon Lands given by the Testator for the payment of Debts or Legacies are not to be inserted into the Inventory Likewise all House-hold-stuff is to be put into the Inventory under which word are comprized Tables Stools Forms Chairs Carpets Hangings Beds Bedding Linnen Bason with Ewers Candlesticks with all sorts of Domestick Vessels whether of Earth Wood Glass Brass or Pewter yea Apparel Books Weapons Tools Cattel of all kind Victuals Corn and Grain of all Sorts Waynes Carts Plow-geare Coaches though no House-hold-stuff also Plate and Jewels and generally all things not affixed to the Free-hold but coming to the Executor and not descending to the Heir are to be Inventaried but such things as are affixed to and so become part and parcel of the Free-hold and all things that descend to the Heir and come not to the Executor are to be exempted out of the Inventory The Lady C. was possessed of divers Leases and conveyed them in Trust and afterwards married with A. B. the Lady received the money upon the Leases and with part of the money she bought Jewels and other part of the money she left and died A. B. took Letters of Administration of the Goods of his Wife and in a Sute in the Ecclesiastical Court the Court would have compelled him to have given an account of the Jewels and for the Money to have put them into the Inventory but the Opinion of the whole Court of B. R. was That he should not put them into the Inventory because the property of the Jewels was absolutely in him as Husband and he had them not as Administrator but of such things as be in Action as he shall have as Administrator he shall be accountable for and they shall be put into the Inventory And for the Monies received upon Trust it was resolved that the same was the Monies of the Trustees and the Wife had no remedy for it but in Equity and therefore the Husband should have it as Administrator And in that Case it was Resolved That if a Woman do convey a Lease in Trust for her use and afterwards marrieth That in such Case it lies not in the power of the Husband to dispose of it And if the Wife die the Husband shall not have it but the Executor of the Wife CHAP. XXII Of Actions mantainable by Executors or Administrators 1. The several kinds of Actions maintainable by Executors 2. An Action Personal in the Testator is none in the Executor 3. An Executor may sue for Rents and the Arrerages thereof yea in some Case where the Testator himself could not 4. An Executor Out-Lawed or Attainted may yet have Action 5. In what Case one Co-Executor may Sue another 6. In what Court Executors ought to Sue 7. Cases in Law touching this Subject 1. REgularly Executors may Charge all others for any Debt or Duty due to the Testator as the Testator himself might have done and the same Actions that the Testator himself might have had the same for the most part may Executors have also And therefore Executors may have Actions of Account Actions of Trespass de bonis asportatis in vita Testatoris Actions of Debt against Goalers upon escape of Prisoners Writs of Errour upon the Statute of 27 Eliz. Attaints upon the Stat. of 23 H. 8. Writs of Restitution upon the Stat. of 21 H. 8. An Indemnitate Nominis when the Testators Goods are taken upon an Out-Lawry against another man of his Name Actions of Covenant for breach of a Covenant made to the Testator Action upon the Case upon the Trover and Conversion of the Testators Goods an Ejectione firmae for an Ejectment of the Testator out of a Term an Action of Debt for Rent behind in the Testators life-time also an Action of Debt for the Arrerages of an Annuity due to the Testator in his life Likewise an Executor for Goods taken from him that belonged to the Testator or for a Treaspass done upon the Lease-Lands or a distraining or an impownding of Goods or Cattel may maintain Actions of Trespass or Replevin or Detinue even before the Will be Proved Likewise c. 2. But an Executor shall not have an Action for a Personal wrong done to the Testator when the wrong done to his Person or that which is his is of that nature as for which Dammages only are to be Recovered and therefore an Executor can bring no Action for the beating or wounding the Testator or for a Trespass done to him in his Cattle Grass or Corn or for a Wast by his Tenant done in his Lands for all these are but Personal Actions and die with the Testators person 3. If one grant a Rent out of his Land for life Provided that it shall not charge his Person and the Rent be behind and the Grantee dieth in this Case the Grantees Executor may have an Action of Debt for those Arrerages Likewise if any Rent or Arrerages of Rent be due to one upon a Grant of Rent out of any Land to him or reservation of Rent upon any Estate made by him of Land in these Cases his Executor may have an Action of Debt for this Rent or he may distrain for it so long as the Land chargeable with the Rent and out of which it doth issue is in his possession that ought to pay it or any claiming by or under him Yea an Executor in some Cases may have his remedy by Action for the Arrerages of Rent which the Testator himself in his life-time could not for if a man grant a Rent-charge out of certain Lands to another for life with a Proviso in the Deed that the Grantee shall not in any sort charge the Person of the Grantor generally and the Rent be behind the Grantee dieth the Executors of the Grantee shall have an Action of Debt against the Grantor and charge his person for the Arrerages in the life of the Grantee notwithstanding that Proviso because the Executors have no other remedy against the Grantor for the Arrerages for Distrain they cannot because the Estate in the Rent is determined and the Proviso cannot leave the Executors without remedy so that the word Proviso in this Case doth work only a qualification or limitation not a Condition or a Covenant 4. One that is Out-Lawed or Attainted in his own person may yet Sue as Executor because
of Succession distinguish thus viz. Either he hath only Brothers of the whole Blood or only such Brothers Children or he hath Brothers by the half Blood or such Brothers Children In the first case the Brothers only succeed in the second case only the Brothers Children in the third case the half Brothers and such Brothers Children succeed equally according to their Stock or Root not according to the number of their persons Likewise if one dye leaving one Brother and three Children of another Brother deceased of the whole Blood the Brother alone shall have as formerly declared as much as the said three Children and these do succeed exclusively to all other collateral Kindred Also Brothers of the half Blood do exclude other collaterals Ascendent as Uncles Aunts whether by the Father or the Mothers side and that without distinction of Sex But put case a man dies without Children or Parents leaving one Brother by the Fathers side only another Brother by the Mothers side only for instance A man having had two Wives and a Son by each dies and the second Wife takes another Husband having a Son by him then if the Son by the second Wife of the first Husband dies he leaves a Brother of the half Blood by the Father and a Brother of the half Blood by the Mother In this case the Civil Law sayes that the Brother by the Fathers side shall succeed in the Goods that came by the Father and he by the Mothers side in the Goods which came by the Mother and both of them equally as to all Goods otherwise acquired but our Law knows no such distinction for they shall succeed equally being equal in degree and equal in Blood because by Marriage all was invested in the Father THE Orphans Legacy The Third Part. OF Legacies and Devises THE CONTENTS OF THE CHAPTERS of the Third Part. Â Chap. OF Legacies and Devises in General 1. Of Devisors and Devises or Legataries 2. Of Words and Expressions sufficient for Legacies 3. Of Conditions and their Resemblances incident unto Legacies 4. Of the several Marks and Kinds of Conditions and Questions in Law touching the same 5. What things are Devisables by Will and whether a Testator may Bequeath what is not his own 6. Of Lands Devisable by Will 7. Certain cases touching Devises of Lands void or not void 8. Certain Cases touching Devises of Land in Fee-simple 9. Certain Cases touching Devises of Land by way of Entail 10. Certain Cases in Law touching Devises of Land for Life only 11. Certain Cases in the Law touching Devises of Leases or for a Term of Years 12. Law Cases touching Devises of Reversions or Remainders 13. Touching Devises of Lands with Limitations and upon Conditions 14. Touching Devises of Rents 15. Of Devises touching the Sale of Lands by Executors or others 16. Of Legacies and Devises in respect of Marriages as also between Husband and Wife 17. Of Legacies and Devises to a Child in the Womb. 18. Certain Cases of Devises touching Lands and Real Chattels 19. Cases in the Law touching Legacies of Chattels Personall 20. Of Legacies touching Goods in Generall also what is to be understood under that Notion of Goods and what by Moveables and Immoveables 21. Law Cases touching Money Bequeathed by the Testator 22. Of Legacies relating to Debts with certain cases in the Law touching the same 23. Touching Election in point of Legacies to whom The Election of a Legacy expressed with too much Generality or Dubiety belongs whether to the Executor or to the Legatary with certain cases in the Law touching the same 24. When and how Legacies are null or become void or voidable with certain cases in the Law touching the same 25. Certain Positions or Assertions of Law for the better understanding of this Subject of Legacies and Devises with certain mixt cases touching the same 26. THE ORPHANS LEGACY The THIRD PART OF Legacies Devises CHAP. I. Of Legacies and Devises in General 1. What a Legacie or Devise is 2. What are the Requisites to the making of a good Devise 3. Whether is more Considerable as to Legacies the Time of making the Testament or of the Testators death 4. In what Court Legacies and Devises are properly Recoverable 1. A Legacy called a Devise at the Common Law is some particular thing or things given or left either by a Testator in his Testament wherein an Executor is appointed to be paid or performed by his Executor or by an Intestate in a Codicil or Last Will wherein no Executor is appointed to be paid or performed by an Administrator The Word Devise is specially appropriated to a Gift of Lands The Word Legacy to a Gift of Chattels though both are used promiscuously For a Devise is said to be where a Man in his Testament giveth or bequeatheth his Goods or his Lands to another after his decease Observe it is formerly said That a Legacy is a particular thing given by last Will and Testament For if a man dispose or transfer his whole Right or Estate upon another That according to the Civil Law is called Haereditas and he to whom it is so transferr'd is termed Haeres but at Common Law he is the Heir to whom all a mans Lands and Herediditaments do descend by right of Blood And by the same Law the Word Devise from the French Deviser is properly attributed to him that bequeaths his Goods by his last Will or Testament in writing the Reason being for that those Goods that now appertain only to the Devisour are by this act distributed and divided into many parts 2. To the giving of Legacies or to the making of a good and sufficient Devise there are several things Required The Person of the Devisor must be Legally qualified to Devise the thing Devised must be such as is Legally Devisable The Devisor at the time of making the Devise must have Animum Testandi That the Devisee or Legatary be in his Person such as is capable of taking by way of Devise That there be no Co-action on the Testator but that his Will be free and independent without fear force or flattery or other Sinister Contrivances That the Devise be made in that due manner and form as it ought to be That the thing Devised be Devised upon none other then if any Lawful Terms and Conditions That the words of the Devise be such as do clearly declare the Mind and Intention of the Devisor That Probate be made of the Testament after the Devisors death And in case it be of Land then that the Devisor be solely seized thereof in a Fee-simple Estate and not joyntly with another and that the Testament wherein such Devise of Land is be made in writing 3. To find out the Testators mind and meaning which is the very Index of the Testament the time of making thereof is regularly more considerable in point of Legacies then the Time of the Testators death
all Devisable and Two parts of Three though held in Knight-service But then the Will must be in Scriptis not Nuncupative Now though Land be thus Deviseable partly by Custom partly by Statute yet there are certain persons incapable of Devising Lands and there are certain Lands incapable of being Devised as appears by what follows in this Chapter 2. As Lands are now Devisable so there are certain Things in some certain cases that pass by way of Bequest by and under a Devise of Lands As thus A Man Seized of Land Devisable Buildeth a House thereupon the House is Devisable the Law is the same as to a Rent-charge de novo created Also a Man Disseisee of Land Deviseable Deviseth to the Disseisor in Fee in Recompence of a Release which the Disseisor made unto him This is a good Devise Also where a Man hath Land in Right of his Wife and he granteth parcel of it to another and after Deviseth the Residue to another This also is good Likewise where a Man hath a Seigniory to him descended of the part of his Mother and after the Tenancy descendeth unto him of the part of his Father both being Devisable and he not having any Issue In this case he may make Devises to several persons that is the Seigniory to one and the Tenancy to another The Lord Dyer also saith That a Termor of Land which is not Deviseable erecting a Furnace and fixing it in the midst of a House in the said Land may Devise this Furnace Also that where a Man is Seized of Land Deviseable and Deviseth totum statum suum to one and his Heirs This shall be a good Devise for the Land Likewise where a Man deviseth primam vesturam seu tonsuram prati which is Deviseable it is good and the Law is the same as to Trees growing and to grow for ever Also Tenant in Fee-simple or in Fee-taile may Devise the Corn though the Land be not Deviseable but as to Trees in that case the Law is otherwise Also a Man Seized of a Mill may Devise the Runner Stone but not the under Stone unless the Mill it self be Devised Likewise a Man Seized of a Common granteth a Rent out of the Land although that the Land be Deviseable yet that Grant is void and by consequence a Devise thereof Nor is an Advowson in gross Deviseable nor any other Thing which lyeth not in Tenure but a Mesnalty or Seigniory is Deviseable because they lye in Tenure And if the Husband Devise the Corn upon his Wives Land and dyes This is good whether the Corn were Sowen before the Marriage or after 3. The persons not qualified to Devise Lands by Will are such as These viz. A Bishop may not Devise the Land of his Bishoprick but of the Arrearages of the Rent of the Bishoprick he may make a Devise by Testament The Law is the same as to a Deane or Parson of a Church Also the Master of an Hospital cannot Devise the Lands of the Hospital nor the Arrearages of Rent issuing out of the same In a word Spiritual Persons Arch-Bishops Bishops Deanes Arch-Deacons Prebends Parsons Vicars or any Member of a Corporation may not Devise the Land or Goods which they have in right of their Churches or Corporations For the Head or any of the Members of a Corporation cannot make a Testament or a Devise of such Lands or goods they have in Common because they are to go in Succession Also an Infant of the Age of 16. Years Seized of Lands Deviseable who may Alien it by the Custom yet he cannot make a Testament or a Devise thereof or if an Infant maketh a Will of his Land within Age and dyeth after that he cometh to full Age making no Revocation This is not a good Will And yet although an Infant until he be of the Age of 21. Years can make no Devise of his Lands Yet it is held that by special Custom in some places where Land is Deviseable by Custom they may Devise it sooner Also a Woman under Covert cannot make a Devise of her Land with or without her Husbands consent neither to her Husband nor to any other Yet of the Goods she hath as Executrix to another she may make an Executor without his consent but of them she can make no Devise either with or without his consent because they are not Deviseable and if she do Devise them the Devise is void Touching such as are Born both Deaf and Dumb The Lord Dyer says They may make a Will of their Land by Signs Though others Affirm That a Man that is both Deaf and Dumb and that is so by Nature cannot make a Testament but that a Man that is so only by Accident may by Writing or Signs so also may a Man that is only Deaf or Dumb whether by Nature or Accident Also an Alien Born and not Denizon'd cannot make a Testament of his Lands yet if an Alien Purchaseth Land in Fee and maketh a Will and after the King maketh him a Denizon after he dyeth his Will is then good as to his Lands or Goods Also a Traytor Attainted from the Time of the Treason committed can make no Devise either of his his Land or Goods for they are all forfeited to the King yet a Pardon from the King restores him to a capacity of dying Testate as to both Likewise a Man Attainted or Convicted of Felony cannot by Testament Devise either Lands or Goods for they are also forfeited but if he be only Indicted and die before Attainder he is then Testable as to both or being Indicted will not Answer upon his Arraignment his standing Mute may possibly preserve him a power of Devising his Lands And although the Testament of a Felo de se be void as to his Goods and Chattels yet as to his Lands it is good So likewise although a Person Outlawed in a Personal Action cannot so long as the Outlawry doth continue in force make a Testament of his Goods and Chattels yet of his Lands he may not so of Persons Outlawed for Felony the Law is the same as to a Man Attainted of a Praemunire It is otherwise if a Man be only Excommunicated 4. Regularly all Persons who may be Grantees may be also Devisees Insomuch that a Devise of Lands is good within the Statute of Wills even to such persons as to whom a Legacy by the Civil Law is void except in certain cases such as Hereticks Apostates Traytors Felons Excommunicates Out-laws Bastards unlawful Colledges Libellers Sodomites manifect Usurers and Recusants Convict It is a Rule That the Devisee must be capable of the thing Devised at the Time of the Devisors death if it be then to take effect in Possession or if it be a Remainder he must be capable of it at the Time when the Remainder shall happen otherwise the Devise is void If so then a Devise to an Infant
Rent where none is in arrear and after Deviseth his Reversion this Devise is not good 3. A Man possessed of a Term for 40. Years Devised that his Eldest Daughter should have the same to her and the Heirs of her Body the Remainder if she dyed without Issue Within the Term to C. his second Daughter in Tail The Eldest Daughter took Husband and dyed within the Term without Issue Her Husband Sold the Term. It was the Opinion of the Court That his Sale thereof was good and that the younger Daughter had no Remedy for it because it was a void Remainder being of a Term which was a Chattel-real and so is to go to the Husband 4. A Lease was made to A. for 41. Years if he should so long live and if he dyed within the said Term that then his Wife should have it for the Residue of the said Years It was held That the limitation to the Wife in Remainder was void for that the Term ended by the death of A. and then there was no Residue to remain to his Wife 5. A Man possessed of certain Goods Devised them by his Will to his Wife for life and after her decease to I. S. and dyed I. S. in the life time of the Wife did Commence Suit in a Court of Equity there to secure his Interest in Remainder A Prohibition was granted in this Case and the Reason was because a Devise in Remainder of Goods was void and therefore no Remedy in Equity for Equitas sequitur Legem It was agreed That a Devise of the Use and Occupation of Lands is a Devise of the Land it self but not so of Goods for one may have the Occupation of them and another the Interest in them 6. Suppose a Man Deviseth a Reversion depending upon an Estate for life to the Parson of D. and to his Successors if the Parson die and after a new Parson be made and the particular Tenant die also the new Parson shall have it Also if a Man Devise Land to one for Term of life the Remainder over in Fee and the Devisee for life refuse yet he in the Remainder may enter but if the Will were That the Executors shall make a Lease for life the Remainder over in Fee and they offer to make a Lease accordingly and the Lessee refuseth he in the Remainder shall not have the Remainder 7. I. S. hath issue Two Sons and dyeth the Elder hath Issue a Daughter who hath Issue a Son and dyeth Land is given by Testament to one for life the Remainder to the next Male of the Body of I. S. begotten the second Son of I. S. shall have the Land and not the Son of the Daughter It would be otherwise if the Remainder were so Entail'd by Deed. 8. If Land be Devised to one for life the Remainder to the Church of D. the Parson of the said Church shall have it And if a Man willeth that after 20. years after the death of the Devisor I. S. shall have the Land in Fee the Heir of the Devisor shall have the Land during the Term and not the Executor 9. A Man Deviseth his Land to his Daughter and Heir being a Feme Covert and to the Heirs of the Woman the Reversion over in Fee and dyeth the Husband refuseth to take by the Devise he in the Remainder entereth he shall retain the Land during the lives of the Husband and Wife but after their decease he Issue of the Wife may enter upon him 10. A Man Seised of Land in Fee hath Issue Two Sons and a Daughter the Father Deviseth the Land to his Wife for Term of life the Remainder propinquioribus de sanguine puerorum of the Devisor the Daughter hath Issue and dyeth the Issue of the Daughter shall have this Remainder and although that the Sons have Issue after yet their Issue shall not have it 11. A Man hath a Term of a Hundred Years to come and he Deviseth this to one for Term of life the Remainder over to I. S. this is a void Remainder it were otherwise if the Devise were that the Devisee shall have the Occupation of the Land during his life the Remainder over 12. A Lease is made for life the Remainder over in Fee reserving Rent by Indenture and for default of Payment that it shall be Lawful for the Lessor to enter and detain during the life of the Lessee he Re-enters for the Rent Arrear he in the Remainder Deviseth the Remainder such Devise of the Remainder is void 13. If Land be given to Two Persons Habendum to the one for life and after his decease to the other in Fee he that hath the Fee may Devise his Reversion thereof Likewise if Land be given to one for life and that after his death it shall descend to I. S. in Fee he may Devise this Remainder Or if a Lease be made dummodo solverit 10 l. to the Lessor for his life he may Devise the Reversion with the Rent Or if a Lease be made to an Infant or Feme-sole for life the Remainder in Fee and the Infant at his full Age or the Feme after Coverture disagree he in Remainder may Devise his Remainder 14. If the Fee-simple of Land be Devised to one the Remainder cannot be Devised to another albeit the first Devise be but Conditional And therefore if a Man Devise his Land to A. B. in Fee so that he pay 100 l. to C. D. And if he fail that then it shall remain to G. D. and his Heirs this Remainder to C. D. is void for upon the Failure of Payment by A. B. the said C. D. may not enter and have the Land but the Devisors next Heir Likewise if Land be Devised to F. G. and his Heirs and if he die without Heirs that then it shall remain to I. M. and his Heirs this is a void remainder 15. A Man may Devise a Term of Years by way of Remainder and the first Devisee cannot hinder the second of the Remnant of the Term. But yet a Man possessed of a Term of Years cannot Entail it by his Will And therefore if a Man Devise his Term to A. B. and his Heirs or to him and the Heirs of his Body or to him and his Issue the Remainder to B. C. this Remainder is void and the Devise is good for the whole Term of Years to A. B. and his Executors 16. A Man Seised of Two Acres in several Towns in one County that is of the one for life and of the other in Fee and maketh a Feofment by Deed of all his Lands in the same County and makes Livery in the Acre in Fee in the name of both the Lessor notwithstanding this may Devise the Reversion of the Acre for life 17. If a Man grants a Rent-charge out of Lands devisable to one for life the Remainder over to the Grantor and his
right Heirs and after the Grantor Devise the Land to a Stranger in Fee and die the Heir of the Devisor may Devise the Remainder of the Rent in Fee 18. A Lease for Term of 100. Years is made to a Bishop and his Successors he maketh a Lease for life Rendring Rent to him and his Successors and after he Deviseth the Reversion with the Rent in Fee this is a good Devise for the Reversion but not for the Rent 19. If a Man having Two Sons and a Daughter Devise his Land to his Wife for Seven Years the Remainder to his Younger Son and his Heirs and if either of the said Two Sons die without Issue of their Bodies the Remainder to the Daughter and her Heirs and the Younger Son die in the life Time of the Father and after the Father die in this case and by this Devise the Daughter hath a good Remainder but it seems the Elder Son hath first an Estate Tail by the Intent of the Devisor 20. If Land be Devised to A. for life the Remainder to B. for life the Remainder to I. S. in Fee in this Case if B. be a Person incapable of a Devise then he in the Remainder in Fee shall take presently after the first Estate for life ended And if the Devise be to a Person incapable for life the Remainder to I. S. in Fee then shall I. S. take presently 21. If a Man Devise his Land to two persons by name and the Heirs of either of their Two Bodies and for default of such Issue the Remainder to the right Heirs of the Devisor after the Devisors death one of the said Devisees dies without Issue the other Devisee hath Issue and dyeth In this Case and by this Devise the issue of such surviving Devisee shall have a Moity and no more of the Land 22. A Lease is made to I. S. for the Term of the life of I. N. the Remainder to the same I. N. for Term of life of the said I. S. I. N. in Remainder releaseth all his right to the said I. S. and dyeth In this Case the Lessor may Devise the Reversion And if a Man who hath a Reversion Deviseth this Reversion by the name of all his Inheritance or Hereditaments in D. it is a good Devise 23. If a Man having Issue Three Sons A. B. and C. doth Devise his Land to C. the Remainder to the next of Blood to the Testator In this Case and by this Devise A. shall have the Land after the death of C. as the next of Blood Likewise if a Man having Four Daughters Devise his Land to the Youngest in Tail the Remainder to the next of Blood by this Devise the Eldest Daughter and not all the rest shall have the Land after the Estate Tail Also if a Man hath Two Sons and a Daughter who hath Two Daughters Devise his Land to a Stranger for life the Remainder to his second Son for life the Remainder in Fee to the next of Blood to his Son in this Case if the Eldest Son die without Issue the Daughter and her Daughters shall have the Land 24. If Land be Devised to A. for life the Remainder to B. and the Heirs of his Body the Remainder to C. D. and his Wife and after to their Children by this Devise C. D. and his Wife have Estates for their Lives only and their Children after them Estates for their Lives Joyntly And albeit they have no Children at the Time yet every Child they shall have after may take by way of Remainder If one Devise his Land in this manner viz. I give my Land to A. in Fee-simple after his decease to B. his Son who is his Heir apparent By this Devise A. hath an Estate for life first the Remainder to his Son for his life the Remainder to the Heir of A. in Fee-simple One Devised his Land to I. S. from Michaelmas following for five Years Remainder after the Plaintiff and his Heirs He dyed before Michaelmas The Question was Whether this were a good Remainder Because it could not enure instantly by his death for it may not begin until the particular Estate which was not to begin till after Michaelmas and a Freehold cannot be in Expectancy But all the Court held That it very well might Expect For in Case of a Devise the Free-hold in the mean Time shall descend to the Heir and vest in him Wherefore without Argument it was Adjudged accordingly and that the Remainder was good If one Devise a Personal Chattel to one for life the Remainder over to another it is a void Remainder If a Man Devise a Term to one for life the Remainder to another for life with divers Remainders over The Executors Consent to the first Devisee will be a Consent as to all the other Remainders Or in Case a Man Devise a Term to one and a Rent thence issuing to another and dies the Executors Consent to the Devise of the Term is an Assent also as to the Rent If an Estate be given to the Husband and Wife and the Heirs of their Two Bodies the Remainder to the right Heirs of the Husband he may Devise that Remainder to his Wife CHAP. XIV Touching Devises of Lands with Limitations and upon Condition 1. The Condition of a Devise of Land not written in the Testators Life Time makes the whole Devise as void as if the Devise it self had not been written 2. A Fee-simple of Remainder upon Condition by way of Devise 3. In what Case the Executors of a substituted Devisee cannot claim the Lands Devised under Limitations 4. A Condition or Limitation may not continue a Devised Estate for part and defeat it for the residue 5. In what Case the word Paying shall be construed only as a Limitation and not as a Condition 6. Not he in Remainder but the Heir shall take the advantage of a Condition broken annexed to a Devise of Lands 7. A Condition or Proviso contrary to Law is a void Condition 8. The Heir may enter upon a breach of Condition notwithstanding a failure of somewhat that ought to have been done by a Third Person 9. The Heir may not enter where it is but a Limitation and not a Condition 10. If the Condition be That a Lessee shall not Demise the Premises for above one Year and he Devise the Premises it is a breach of the Condition 11. Lands Devised upon Condition of superstitious Vses are vested in the Crown 1. IF a Man give order for the writing a Devise of his Land to A. B. upon Condition and the Devise to him be accordingly written but the Testator dyeth before the writing of the Condition in this Case the whole Devise to A. B. is void And as in the case of Goods and Chattels conditionally bequeathed the Executor shall keep the Thing until the Condition be performed and after the Condition broken shall take advantage thereof So
Province such Bona Notabilia are Or unless by Custome it appertains to the Major of some Borough for ordinarily and regularly though Wills and Testaments are to be Proved before the Judge of that Jurisdiction within which the Testator died or rather within which he had his usual habitation and made his last aboad yet some Testaments may be Proved in some Boroughs before the Major thereof by Custome where it shall be understood to be only in respect of the Burgages within such places deviseable but in respect of their Goods they shall be Proved according to the Law Communi Formā and there only where the Lands are bequeathed which is nothing strange when as aforesaid in some Mannors by Prescription Testaments may be Proved before the Stewards thereof yea though no Lands be bequeathed therein The Probate of Testaments did belong to Ordinaries but of later Times de Consuetudine Angliae non de Communi Jure and the power to grant Administration was granted to the Ordinary by the Stat. of 31 Ed. 3. cap. 11. And before that time the King was accustomed to seize the Goods of the Intestate to the intent they might be bestowed for the burial of the dead and the payment of the Intestates Debts and the advancement of his Wife and Children and the Ordinary himself hath not power to sell the Goods of the Intestate though they be in danger of perishing nor release a Debt due to the Intestate by the Stat. of 31 Ed. 3. The Commissary of the Bishop of the Diocess granted Letters ad colligendum ad vendendum ea quae peritura essent inde computum reddere the Grantee sold Goods which would not keep but perished and an action of Debt was brought against him as Executor in his own wrong and it was adjudged maintainable because the Ordinary himself had not such power and therefore he could not give it to another 7 Eliz. Dyer 256. Again the practice hath been when Testaments have been Proved before other than such as are mentioned in the Premises as appears by this Case A Testament is disproved in the Ecclesiastical Court and the party appeals to the Metropolitan and it is there disproved and afterwards there is an Appeal to the Court of Delegates and it is there disproved also and at last the party appealed to the Queen in Chancery by the Stat. 25 H. 8. and there also it was disproved before the Commissioners And if the Queen ex Authoritate sua Regali might grant Letters of Administration was the Question The Opinion of the Justices of the Common Pleas was That she might because the said Court of Chancery is the Highest Court and the matter being once there it cannot be determined in any Inferiour Court and then the party may shew in his Declaration generally the matter and that Administration was granted to him by the Queen Ex sua Regali Authoritate under the Seal of the Court of Delegates Mich. 24 Eliz. in C. B. See after 10 Jae in B. R. Stephenson's Contrary That the Court of Delegates cannot grant Letters of Administration A Lessee for years of Lands by his Last Will Devised his Term to one whom he made his Executor and died the Devisee entered before any Probate of the Will and held the Land for a year and more without any Probate and then died The Question was whether his Executor or Administrator should have the Term or that the Ordinary should commit Administration of the Goods of the first Testator It was the Opinion of the Court That the property of the Term was lawfully in the Executor by his Entry and the Devise well executed without any Probate In Debt against Executors it was Resolved That if any of the Exccutors refuse before the Ordinary yet he that refused may Administer the Testators Goods at his pleasure and Prove the Will but if all the Exccutors do refuse before the Ordinary there Administration shall be granted and they cannot after Administer 2. That in Debt brought against an Executor it is a good Plea That the Testator made him and another Executor who is alive not named without saying that the Testament is Proved 3. Resolved That the Lords of Mannors in former times had the Probate of Wills in their Courts and in ancient time when a man died Intestate and had made no disposition of his Goods the trust of them was committed to the King who was and is Parens Patriae And the Ordinary was Constituted by the King in loco Parentis and his Power was given to him by the Stat. of 31 E. 3. cap. 11. 4. Resolved that although the Ordinary had the Power given to him as before yet no Power thereby is given to the Ordinary to sell or dispose of the Goods either to his own use or to the use of any other and that he hath not any absolute property in the Goods but a property only secundum quid 2. The Testament is to be Proved by the Executor whom the competent Judge either ex Officio or at the instance of the interessed may call before him to Prove the same and to declare his acceptance or refusal of the Execution thereof yea some think it may be done at the instance of such as have no interest to the intent that thereby they may be certified whether the Testator left them a Legacy And because it often happens that a Last Will or Testament is left in the Custody of some other Friend than the Executor the Law hath provided that in whose hands soever it remains he is compellable to produce the same and to exhibite such Testament And if he once had it the Law presumes him to have it still untill he prove the contrary by good evidence or by his own oath at least Also an Executor dying before he hath Proved his Testators Will his Executor that is the Executors Executor may not Prove both the Wills and so become Executor to both the Testators but in case the Goods of the first Testator were after Debts paid bequeathed to the first Executor then may his Executor take Administration of the first Testators Goods with the Will annexed 3. The time when the Will is to be Proved is somewhat uncertain and left to the discretion of the Judge according to the distance of the place the weight of the Will the quality of the Executors the absence of the Witnesses the importunity of Creditors and Legataries and other circumstances incident hereunto Yet regularly Testaments ought to be insinuated to the Official or Commissary of the Bishop of the Diocess within four months next after the Testators death And the Ordinary may sequester the Goods of the deceased untill the Executors have Proved the Testament so may the Metropolitan if the Goods be in divers Diocesses Also the Ordinary may compell the Executor to Prove the Will and to accept or refuse
ought in this Case the Feoffor ought to pay the money at the day appointed to the Executors and not to the Heir of the Feoffee unless the condition were that the Feoffor pay to the Feoffee or to his Heirs such a summ of money at such a day Here note That the Executors do more represent the person of the Testator than the Heir doth the person of the Ancestor for though the Executor be not named yet the Law appoints him to receive the money but not so the Heir unless he be named Here also note That if the Condition upon the Mortgage be to pay the Mortgagee or his Heirs the money and before the day of payment the Mortgagee dieth the Feoffor cannot in this Case pay the money to the Executors of the Mortgagee But if the Condition be to pay the money to the Feoffee his Heirs or Executors then the Feoffor hath election to pay it either to the Heir or Executors 2. If a man make a Feoffment in Fee upon Condition that the Feoffee shall pay to the Feoffor his Heirs or Assigns Twenty pound at such a day and before the day the Feoffor makes his Executors and dieth the Feoffee may as aforesaid pay the same either to the Heir or to the Executors for they are the Feoffors Assigns to this intent But if a man make a Feoffment in Fee upon Condition that if the Feoffor pay to the Feoffee his Heirs or Assigns Twenty pounds before such a Feast and before the Feast the Feoffee maketh his Executors and dieth the Feoffor ought to pay the money to the Heir and not to the Executors for the Executors in this Case are no Assigns in Law And the reason of this difference is for that in the first Case the Law must of necessity find out Assigns because there cannot be any Assignes in Deed for the Feoffor hath but a bare Condition and no Estate in the Land which he can assign over but in the other Case the Feoffee hath an Estate in the Land which he may Assign over And where there may be Assignes in Deed the Law shall never seek out or appoint Assignes in Law CHAP. XIX Touching the Executors Election to accept or refuse the Executorship 1. Of the Judges Power to affix the time for that Election or in Case of the Executors refusal what his Power is 2. In what Case a person may be compell'd to accept the Executorship notwithstanding his Judicial refusal 3. How one appointed Executor by the Will may Administer notwithstanding his refusal to Prove the same 1. HE that is appointed Executor in a Will may be summoned to appear before the Judge of the Jurisdiction to accept or refuse the Executorship The time wherein he that is named Executor in the Testament is to deliberate and determine whether he will accept or refuse the Executorship is uncertain and left to the discretion of the Judge who hath used at his pleasure and when he will not only within the year but within a moneth or two to Cite him that is named Executor to accept or refuse the Executorship and upon the non-appearance or refusal of such Executor to Prove the Will the Judge may commit Administration as of an Intestate And such Administrators Power is effectual in Law untill the Executor undertake the Executorship For then the Judge may revoke such Administration But if the Judge knowing that there is a Will grant Administration not having first called the Executor to accept or refuse the Executorship the Executor when he shall have Proved the Will may Sue such Administrator in an Action of Thespass Because the Judge hath no power to grant Administration but in Case of Intestation or that the persons named Executors either will not or cannot be Executors 2. No man can be compell'd to accept the Executorship unless he hath already intermedled with the Testators Goods as Executor for then it is too late for him to refuse Yet if any Legacy be given him in the Will wherein he is named Executor he may then be compelled to accept the Executorship or he shall lose his Legacy Yea though he were of Kin or Allied to the Testator Yet the Wife shall not lose her Thirds nor the Children their Filial Portions by refusing the Executorship 3. Although where an Executor hath Administred he cannot afterward refuse because he hath thereby determined his Election and although where there is an Executor and he refuse or many and all refuse the party is dead as Intestate and Administration is to be committed with the Will annexed yet in case there be divers Executors viz. A. B. C. and A. only refuse and the Will be Proved by the other Two there A. continueth an Executor notwithstanding his refusal so as he may still release debts of the Testator and debts owing by the Testator may be released to him Yea if Sute be to be had by or against the Executors it shall not be in the Names of B. and C. only but A. also must be Named as a Plaintiff or Defendant or else the Action may be overthrown Yea this Executor which refused may afterwards Administer at his pleasure and intermeddle with the Goods as well as the others but after their death he cannot so do for then the Executor of him that Proved the Will is only to Administer and the others refusal continuing to the death of his Co-Executor his Power then died also with him but so long as the one Co-Executor liveth that Proved the Will the other though he refused the Executorship before the Judge may yet afterwards so long as the other lives Administer the Goods or Remit the Debts due to the Testator And that Co-Executor that so Proved the Will cannot hinder him nor can he Recover against the persons by him so released Trespass It was found by Verdict That Sir Ralph Rowlet being possess'd of a Term made his Last Will and thereof made the Lord Keeper Bacon Catlin Chief Justice and others his Executors and Devised the Term to the Lord Catlin and died All the Executors wrote a Letter to Dr. Dale Judge of the Prerogative Court That they could not intend the Execution of the Will and desired him to commit the Administration to Henry Goodyer the next Kin of the Testator The Administration was accordingly granted but the Register Entered the Cause viz. For that the Executors did defer suscipere onus Testamenti After this Catlin Entered upon the Land Devised to him and granted it over the doubt was whether this Grant were good 1. Whether the Letter were a sufficient Renunciation 2. Whether if they once refuse they may after Administration granted Administer at their pleasure Dr. Ford declared to the Justices That by the Civil Law a Renouncing may be as well by matter in Fact as by a Judicial Act and they may refuse
Executors if they have no further Authority or Interest than only to sell the Land and distribute the money for then the Frank-Tenement doth descend to the Heir and the Executors are bound to perform the Devise in convenient time But if the money for the same be to be distributed in pios usus then the Frank-Tenement is in the Executors after the death of the Testator and not in the Heir So that in such Case he may not Enter as in the former Yea if Lands Devised to be sold be not accordingly so done by the Executors the Law will then enforce them to sell the Lands so soon as they can because the mean Profits in that Case taken before Sale are not Assets to charge the Executors as compellable to pay debts of the same But if a man Devise that his Executors shall sell his Land there they may sell it at any time for that they have but a bare and naked Power and no Profit 4. If many Executors be named in a Will wherein Power is given to them to sell Land for any purpose and some of these Executors refuse the Executorship In this Case the other Executors who stand to the Will may dispose and sell the Land without the consent of the other who so refused the Executorship But Note That an Executors Executor cannot sell the Land of the first Testator who by his Will gave Power to his Executor to sell the same unless there be a Co-Executor surviving 5. Although the surviving Executor may sell the Land which a Testator doth bequeath to his Executors to be Sold because as the State so the Trust shall survive yet in case the Executors in that part of the Will impowering them to Sell be particularly Named each by his particular Name and one of them refuse and dye before Sale made then the Survivors cannot sell the same because the words of the Testator one of the Executors refusing or being dead cannot be satisfied unless the Testator express in his Will a Power to the Survivors or Survivor of them or to such or so many of them as take upon them the Probate of the Will without which words the Executors being particularly Named it is otherwise But if the Land to be Sold be left to his Executors generally not particularizing their Names then Sale made by some of them only in this Case is good for that now by the Statute of 21 H. 8. cap. 4. it is Provided That where Lands be Willed to be sold by Executors though part of them refuse yet the residue may sell But here Note That they may not sell to him that so refused because he is yet a party and privy to the Last Will and remains an Executor still so long as any Co-Executor lives For it was the Opinion of the c. Note that by the Opinion of the Justices if a man makes his Last Will and Wills that his Executors shall sell his Land and Devises his Land to his Executors to be sold and one of the Executors refuse the Administration of the Testators Goods before the Ordinary the other Executors cannot sell the said Land to the Executor so refusing the Administration by the Statute 21 H. 8. cap. 4. For that Executor notwithstanding such his refusal is still a party and privy to the said Testament and is one of the Executors at his pleasure It was adjudged in B. R. between Vincent and Lee where a man devised That his Sons in Law should sell the Reversion of his Land without mentioning their particular Names if some of them dye that the others may sell Upon a special Verdict the Case was A man seised of Lands in Possession and of other Lands in Reversion upon an Estate for life Deviseth by his Will in writing That his Executors should have all his Lands Free and Customary in D. for Ten Years to perform his Will and the Will of his Father with the Profits thereof and that after the Ten Years his Executors or any of them should sell it for the payment of his Debts He makes Three Executors and dies The one dies the Ten Years expire Tenant for Life dies the Two surviving Executors sell the Land c. Spurling This Sale is not good 1. The Reversion of the Estate for Life passed not because he had other Lands there to satisfie the words and it was not his intent to pass it because there were not any Profits to be taken thereby 2. The Sale by the Two surviving Executors is not good for it ought to have been by all or by one of them only But the Court resolved to the contrary in both wherefore it was adjudged accordingly The same Case is Reported by Anderson thus viz. J. T. brought Ejectione Firmae against J. W. and others The Defendants pleaded Non Culp whereupon Special Verdict was given the which in effect was That one Smith being seised of Twenty Acres of Land made a Lease thereof to one for Life and being also seised of Sixty other Acres made his Will in manner following viz. I Will and Charge my Executors and every of them to fulfill my Fathers Will and this my Last Will in which were divers Legacies In Consideration whereof I give all my Lands and Tenements to my Executors and they to take the Profits thereof by the space of Ten Years and those Ten Years ended I will the same to be sold by my said Executors or by one of them And made Three Executors and died after the Tenant for life died one of the Executors died also The Two Executors Enter on the Sixty Acres and receive the Profits thereof for Ten Years but Entered not on the Twenty Acres but after the Ten Years ended the surviving Executors sold the Twenty Acres to J. H. who Entered and Leased the same whereon the Action is brought It was said That the Executors did not Sell but it was adjudged that the surviving Executors might Sell For it appeared that the Intention of the Testator was That the Land should be sold for the performance of his Will which the surviving Executors might Execute and consequently do what the Testator appointed in order thereunto CHAP. XXVIII Of Debts Legacies and Mortuaries and the Executors method in the payment thereof 1. Debts to be paid before Legacies 2. The Executor may pay himself first 3. What Debts to the Crown shall have priority of payment before Debts to the Subject 4. Judgements upon Record to be satisfied next after the Debts due to the Crown 5. Next after Judgements upon Record Debts by Statutes or Recognizances are payable before meer Personal Debts 6. After Statutes and Recognizances Debts due by Obligations or penal or single Bills are to have the next precedency in payment 7. Debts upon Specialties Bonds and Bills are to be satisfied before Debts upon a simple Contract 8. After Obligations Debts due upon simple Bills Merchants Books and other Specialties are
are to be sued for in that Court only yet the Ordinary cannot take Cognizance of Freehold devised And whereas it is said That the Devisee may not take the Legacy and serve himself but that it must be Delivered to him by the Executor yet the Law is otherwise in Case Lands or any Rents or other Profit to be taken out of Lands be Devised to a Man in Fee-simple Fee-tayle for Life or Years for in these Cases the Devisee may enter into and take the thing Devised without the Executors leave for so doing CHAP. II. Of Devisors and Devisees or Legataries 1. Who may be a Devisor or Devisee or Legatary 2. What persons are incapable of being Legataries 3. Whether an Infant in the Womb may be a Legatary or a Feme Covert to her own Husband 4. Whether Bastards may be Legataries 1. REgularly every one that is qualified to make a Testament may make a Devise of the same thing whereof he may make such Testament and whosoever is disabled to the one is disabled to the other also And therefore Infants under the age of 21. years may not be Devisors of Land nor of Goods under the age of 14. as to the Male or under the age of 12. Years as to the Female Nor may a Woman under Covert Baron Devise her Lands to her own Husband or to others with or without his Consent Nor may any Ecclesiastical person or Member of a Body Corporate Devise the Lands or Goods which they have in right of the Church or Corporation So that every Devisor ought to be a person qualified to devise and that both in respect of his Person and the thing Devised he must also have at the same time Animum Testandi and the thing Devised must be such as is Devisable And as to the Devisee or Legatary all such by the Civil Law as are uncapable of Inheritances and Goods are excluded from being Legataries or Devisees and indeed from being Executors But every one by that Law that may be made an Heir or Executor may also be a Legatary or Devisee and as to any others no Devise may be made Yet with this Difference that the Executor must be a Person capable both when the Testament is made and when the Testator dyes But it is sufficient for the Legatary that he be capable at the Testators death Indeed at the Common Law it is otherwise for there a Devise or Legacy may be given to all persons to whom a Grant may be made save in some few Cases And the Devise ought to be good and sufficient in Law at the time of the Testators death Therefore if a Man Devise Lands to an Hospital or the like when there is none such at the Testators death though afterwards made or erected such Devise is Null and Void The Reason is Because Devises at Common Law are Purchases and he that taketh Lands by Purchase must be capable to take the same when it falleth to him by the Purchase Thus by the Common Law the Devisee ought to be capable at the time of the death of the Devisor which holds also True by the Civil Law Hence it is that though a Man may not grant nor give Lands to his Wife during the Coverture because they both are but one Person in Law yet by Custom heretofore he might and by Statute now he may Devise his Lands to his Wife to have in Fee-simple or otherwise because such Devise taketh not effect till the death of the Devisor and then they are not one person So then Regularly whosoever may be a Grantee may also be a Devisee or Legatee 2. For which Reason a Cominalty not Incorporate by the Kings Charter to Purchase Lands is Incapable therefore if a Man Devise Lands Devisable in Fee to A. for Life upon a certain Condition the Remainder to certain Men of a Fraternity upon the same Condition not Incorporate by the Kings Charter and enabled to Purchase this Remainder is void Therefore a Legacy given to an unlawful Colledge is void for by that is meant all Companies Societies Fraternities and other Assemblies not so Constituted by the Prince and therefore incapable of being Legataries But generally a Devise may be good to any Person or Persons not specially rendred incapable by Law for by the Civil and Ecclesiastical Law the Legacy is void if it be given to an Heretick Apostate Traytor Felon Persons Excommunicate outlawed Persons Bastard unlawful Colledge as aforesaid Libeller ler Sodomite Manifest and Notorious Usurer except in some special Cases And yet it seems that a Devise of Lands to any such Persons is good within the Statute of Wills Likewise an uncertain Person can be no Competent Legatary no more then he is of being an Executor insomuch that if a Man Bequeath any thing to a person by a certain Name without other description of his person and there be more then one of the same Name known To the Testator in this Case neither of them shall be Legatary by Reason of the uncertainty Hence it is that Devises made in these words viz. To his best Friend or to his best Friends are void Devises Or to his Son A. B when he hath two Sons of the same Name unless you can help it by an Averment which Son the Testator meant but persons named Alternatively or Disjunctively are not so uncertain but may be admitted as Legataries And therefore if the Testator Bequeath 10 l. to A. or B. or to such or such a person both of them shall have the Legacy equally betwixt them Because this word Or is in favour of Testaments taken for and when it is so placed between two persons either as to the appointing of Executors or to the making of Legataries unless it can be well proved That the Testator did bear more affection to the one then to the other Or that he gave Authority to some other person of making the Election which of the two should be the Legatary Or when one of the persons is Incapable of being a Legatary for any of the Reasons aforesaid And if the Devisor doth Bequeath to his Brother or his Children such a thing saying I give to my Brother or his Children in this Case upon the presumption of Affection the Brother shall enjoy the Legacy during his life and after him the Children shall be the Legataries But if it be Devised to him and his Children then are both the Parent and his Children equal and Joynt-Legataries And whereas it is formerly hinted That an Heretick may not be a Legatary or Devisee understand it of an Heretick that is such at the time of the Devisors death for it doth not prejudice the Legatary that fie was an Heretick at the time of the making of the Testament so as he be not one at the Testators death Add nnto this Anabaptists for the Law Civil and Canon excludes them
also as Incapable of being Legataries But a person outlawed though depending the Outlawry against him he cannot Sue for his Legacy Yet he is not so properly said to be altogether Incapable of being a Legatary as of being Incapable of Suing for his Legacy unless the Outlawry be Reversed by some Error or discontinuance in the Suit or unless the party Outlawed were beyond the Seas at the time of the Outlawry being pronounced Or unless there were some defect on omission of the Three Proclamations in such Cases by the Stat. required Or unless his pardon be obtained wherein the words of the Pardon ought diligently to be considered For by force of the Outlawry the Legacy is forfeited and confiscate Likewise a person Excommunitate is not so Incapable of being a Legatary as unadmissable by the Ordinary to Commence any Suit for his Legacy during his persistency under such Sentence of Excommunication 3. If one Devise to an Infant in his Mothers Womb it is a good Devise otherwise it is by Feofment Grant or Gift For in those Cases there ought to be one of ability to take presently or otherwise it is void And if one Devise his Land to his Daughter and Heir Apparent in Fee-simple and the Wife of the Devisor be privily with child of a Son which is born after his death Then is the Devise become good for that now she is not Heir to her Father Also a Feme Covert may be a Competent Devisee or Legatary to her own Husband as to such Lands Goods or Chattels which he shall devise to her 4. Whereas Bastards whether Bastards in simple Fornication in Adultery or in Incest are without distinction incapable by the Civil Law of being Legataries yet understand this only where they are made Executors or Legataries to their own natural Parents for to any othets they may be Executors or Legataries Also by the Ecclesiastical Laws they are capable of being Legataries even to their Adulterous or Incestuous Parents so far as is needfull or necessary for their convenient sustentation or for their competent alimentation and relief Therefore have the Laws and Statutes of this Realm provided for the same purpose which do also permit every Man as well by Deed executed in his life time as by his last Will and Testament to be executed after his death to give or devise to any of their Bastards without distinction all their Lands Tenements Hereditaments without restraint And by the civil Law the lawful Children of Bastards may be Legataries to the Adulterous Grandfather but not to the Incestuous Grandfather If a man possessed of Goods devises the same to his Son when he shall attain to the Age of 21. Years and in case the Son dye before that Age then one of his Daughters to have the said Goods and the Son die before the said Age. The Question is Whether the Daughter shall have the Goods immediately upon and after the Sons death or whether she shall stay till the time that the Son should have been of that Age in case he had so long lived The opinion of all the Justices was That she shall have the goods immediately upon the Sons death A Man had Issue a Bastard and after Intermarries with the same Woman by whom he had that Bastard and hath Issue Two Sons by her and then Devised all his Goods to his Children It is by every one supposed That the Bastard shall have nothing for that he is Nullius Filius In that case it is clear that a Bastard shall not take by a Grant But Q. as to a Devise And if the Mother of the Bastard make such a Devise It is clear That the Bastard shall take thereby because he is certainly known to be the Child of his Mother CHAP. III. Of Words and Expressions sufficient for Legacies 1. Any Words whereby the Testators mind or meaning is express'd or implyed are sufficient for Legacies 2. Legacies are not destroyed by Words impertinently used by the Testator in the Bequest 3. That words carrying a false demonstration shall not vitiate and null the Legacy Also how this is to be understood 4. Whether a Legacy may be Bequeathed only by the Testators Signs Becks or Nodds when he can speak articulately 5. Whether a Legacy shall pass by Words only Implicatory of a contrary Condition 6. In point of Legacies the Testators meaning express'd by Words is more to be heeded then when implyed by Deeds 7. The Testators Words by Implication may be such as may make the Legacy greater Casually then he plainly express'd Originally 1. IF a Man in his last Will and Testament says I do give bequeath devise order or appoint to be paid given or delivered or my will pleasure or desire is That he shall have or receive or keep or retain or I Dispose or Assign or Leave such a thing to such a one or let such a person have such a thing or any other Words whereby the Testators Mind or Meaning of Bequeathing is expressed or sufficiently implyed shall be significant enough whereby the Legacy shall pass provided no other Legal Obstacle stand in the way because it is not in last Wills and Testaments as in Deeds for in Deeds the Words do fall under a stricter examinination then the intention or the mind but in Wills and Testaments the Testators Mind and Meaning is more valuable and of more efficacy in Construction then his Words so long as the Interpretation of his Mind and Meaning hold a Conformity with his words nor is oppugned by any other part of his last Will and Testament 2. A Testator in making a Bequest may possibly speak such words as may be very impertinent yea and in themselves altogether untrue and yet the Legacy not destroyed As thus viz. If I give and Bequeath my Field Long-acre to A. B. beyond above besides more then or over and above the Black Horse which I had of him in Consideration of the Ten pounds which he owed me This Long-acre is a good Devise or Legacy to A. B. albeit the Testator never had any such Black Horse of him and althongh he never owed him any such Ten pounds The Reason is because the said words above beyond c. in this sense and in this case are Inclusive and are so to be understood and interpreted So that 3. A false Demonstration shall not vitiate a Legacy Insomuch that if the Testator who hath Bequeathed nothing to A. B. do say That out of the Hundred pounds which I have Bequeathed to A. B. I de give Fifty to C. D. If in this case it be questioned whether any thing be due to A. B. And what is due to C. D. The Answer is That Fifty Pounds are due to G. D. although nothing be here Beqeathed to A. B. because a Legacy shall not be vitiated or nulled meerly by a false Demonstration But to A. B. nothing
a Disseisor Devise the Land he hath gotten by Disseizin this Devise as to the Disseizee is void Likewise if a Man be Disseized of his Land so that he hath nothing but a Right thereof left and then he Devise this Right or the Land this Devise is also void So if one Contract for Land and pay his Money for the same but hath no Assurance made him of the Land and he Devise the same to another such Devise cannot be good yet possibly he that received the Money may be compellable in a Court of Equity to Assure and Settle the Land according to the Devise Likewise if one Devise another Mans Land such Devise is void but if after such Devise made he Purchase this Land and die without Revocation now is that Devise good Also if A. Bargain and Sell Land to B. on Condition of Re-entry if he pay to B. Twenty Pounds and B. Covenants that he will not take the Profits until default of Payment and A. make a Lease of Seven Years thereof to another and after break the Condition in this case B. may Devise the Land and the Devise will be good 3. If one Devise his Land to the Children of A. B. by this Devise the Children that A. B. hath at the Time of the Devise made or at most at the Time of the Testators death and not such as shall be Born after his death shall take by that Devise and have the Land Also if a Devise of Lands or Goods be made to the Heirs of A. B. he then and at the Time of the Testators death being alive this Devise is void because the person to whom a Devise is made must be capable of the Devise by that Name by which the Devise is made to him when there is no other description whereby to infer the Testators meaning yet if Lands or Goods be Devised to the Executors of A. B. and he die before the Testator and make Executors This is a good Devise to such Executors or if a Man make a Feofment of his Land to the use of his last Will and then Devise that his Feoffees shall be Seized to the use of B. C. This is a good Devise of the Land per intentionem Also a Devise of Land to one paying so much a Year to another with a Clause of Distress upon failure of Payment is a good Devise but a Warranty cannot be made by a a Will Yet if Land be Devised for Life or in Tail Reserving a Rent in this case the Devisors Heirs shall be bound to the Warranty in Law and the Devisee shall take advantage thereof Also a Devise of Land may be made to one and a Devise of a Rent out of the same Land to another in the same Will and both stand good Likewise Land may be Devised to one in Fee and after the same Land in the same Will may be Devised to another for Life or for Years and both these Devises may be good and may well consist together 4. In like manner if a Man in the former part of his Will Devise all his Lands by general words to one in Fee and in the latter part of his Will Devise some special part thereof unto another in Fee Both these Devises are good and may stand together that is The former Devise is good for as much as is not afterwards more specially Devised notwithstanding the Subsequent Specification and the latter is good for so much as is so specially Devised notwithstanding the precedent general Disposition It is otherwise when the general Clause comes last for then the first Devise is void So also it is supposed to be where both the Devises are particular that then the first Devise is void As suppose a Man doth first in his Will Devise Long-acre to A. and his Heirs afterwards in the same Will he doth Devise the same Land to B. and his Heirs in this case some have held the first Devise to A. is void which others have denyed holding that both the Devises are good and that A. and B. in this case shall be Joynt-Tenants 5. If a Man Devise the Use Profits or Occupation of his Land by this Devise the Land it self is Devised Or if a Man Devise only the Profits of his Land this is a Devise of the Land it self For Lands will pass by words in a Will which will not pass by the same words in a Deed but whatsoever will pass by any Words in a Deed will pass by the same Words in a Will The Reason is because Wills are always more favourably interpreted than Deeds and there is good Reason for that also If a Man says in his Will I give all my Land or all my Tenements to A. B. he shall have not only all the Lands whereof the Devisor is Sole Seized but also all the Lands whereof he is Seized in Common or Co-parcenary with another and not only all the Lands he hath in possession but also the Lands he hath in Reversion of any Estate he hath in Fee-simple But if he say I give all my Lands in Possession only then the Lands he hath in Reversion are excluded out of that Devise 6. If a Man Seized of Land of Fee-simple in the Parish of Grade saith in his Will I give all my Lands in the said Parish to A. B. and after the Will made and published he doth Purchase other Lands in the said Parish and dyeth in this case and by this Devise A. B. shall not have the new Purchased Lands Yet by a new Publication of the Will after the Purchasing of such Lands they will pass to A. B. the Devisee Yea though he hath no Land in the said Parish at the Time of making the said Devise yet if afterwards he doth Purchase Lands in that Parish in this case such ne 〈…〉 Purchased Lands will pass by the said Devise because it shall in that case be intended that he meant to Purchase them Also if a Man hath some Lands in Fee-simple and other Lands only for Years in Dale and he Devise all all his Lands and Tenements in Dale by this Devise the Lands and Tenements he hath for Years doth not pass but if he hath no other Lands in Dale but those for Years in this case probably they will pass 7. A. Deviseth his Lands to M. his Wife until E his Daughter shall accomplish the Age of 21. Years the Reversion to the said E. and the Heirs of her Body upon Condition that she shall pay unto his said Wife during her Life in Recompence of her Dower of all his Lands 20 l. and upon default of Payment he wills his Wife shall enter and enjoy all the Lands during her life the Remainder ut supra the Remainder to I. S. in Tail and dies M. the Wife enters E. the Daughter being within the Age of 14. Years M. takes to Husband I. D. The Husband and
8. A Man Seised of a Messuage holden in Socage in Fee Devised the same by these words I Devise my Messuage where I dwell to A. B. and her Assigns for 10. Years and A. B. shall have all my Inheritances if the Law will In this Case the Devise in Fee of the Messuage is good and by the general words of the Will all his Inheritances do also pass 9. If a Man Devise Lands to one for ever there he hath a Fee for such an Estate might be conveyed by Act Executed But if he further Devise That if the Devisee do such an Act that then another shall have the Land to him and his Heirs the same is void for when as he hath disposed of the Estate in Fee to one he hath not power after in the same Will to dispose the same to another it being a Rule in Law That such an Estate which cannot by the Rules of the Common Law be conveyed by Grant Executed in his life time by Advice of Council learned in the Law such an Estate cannot be Devised by the Will of a Man who is presumed to be void of Council 10. A Man having Lands in Fee-simple and goods to the Value of 5 l. only Devised to his Wife all his Estate paying his Debts and Legacies his Debts and Legacies amounting to 40 l. It was Adjuged in this Case That all his Lands did pass by the Devise and that the Devisee had a Fee-simple in the Lands the word Paying enforcing it for they are to be paid presently which cannot be if the Lands pass not in Fee And if a Man Deviseth all his Rents It was held That all his Lands do pass 11. Note That by intendment of Law a Devise shall be for the benefit of the Devisee and not to his prejudice As if Land to the Value of 3 l. per annum be Devised to A. and that A. shall pay out of it 50 s. per annum In this Case A. hath but an Estate for life for he may pay it out of the Profits of the Lands and is sure to be at no loss But if it be Devised to B. for life the Remainder to A. paying 50 s. per annum out of it In this Case A. hath a Fee-simple by Implication because after the Payment thereof A. may dye before he can receive satisfaction for the same out of the Profits of the Land and therefore such Devise shall be a Fee-simple because the Law intends that the Devise was for the benefit of the Devisee 12. Note also That if a Man hath Lands in Fee and Lands for Years and he Deviseth all his Lands and Tenements the Fee-simple Lands pass only and not the Lease for Years 2 If a Man hath a Lease for Years and no Freehold and Deviseth all his Lands and Tenements the Lease for Years passeth 3 That if one Deviseth his Lands which he hath by Lease to his Executor for life the Remainder over that there ought to be a special Assent thereunto by the Executors as to a Legacy otherwise it is not Executed 13. A. Devised his Lands in London to his Son and his Heirs after the decease of his Wife and in Case his Daughter should Survive his Wife and his Son and his Heirs that then the Daughters should have it for Life and after their death I. and R. should have the same and that they should pay 6 l. 16 s. yearly to the Company of Merchant-Taylors to be disposed of to Charitable Uses In this Case three Points were Argued 1 Whether the Wife had an Estate for life by Implication of the Will And it was Resolved That she had 2 Whether the Son had a Fee-simple or Fee-tail And it was Resolved That he had a Fee-tail by Implication of these words viz. if his Daughters Survive his Wife and his Son and his Heirs whereby it is plainly implyed That the Heirs there intended are the Heirs of his Body and not his Heirs in Fee for so long as the Daughters live the Son could not dye without a Collateral Heir 3 What Estate I. and R. have after the death of the Daughters And as to That it was Resolved That they have a Fee-simple by Reason of the Annual Payment of Money and it is not to be regarded what Annual Value the Land is of over and above the Sums they pay for every Sum of Money paid or payable doth cause the Devisee to have a Fee-simple And Coke Chief Justice said That a Devise to A. and his Successors is a Devise of a Fee-simple without the word Heirs because it implyes a Fee-simple although it wants the express words Between L. Plaintiff and B. Defendant L. Seised of Land in Fee Devised it unto Two Persons Equaliter and to their Heirs Whether this made them Joynt-Tenants or Tenants in Common was the Question It was holden by the whole Court That they were Joynt-Tenants and not Tenants in Common A Man Seised of Lands Devised them by his Testament to his Wife to dispose and imploy them for her and his Sons at her own Will and Pleasure And it was held by Dyer Weston and Welch That she had a Fee by such words as if he had Devised the Lands for ever For the Construction of Law supplies the defect in these words of the Devisor according to his meaning And it was held by Dyer and Welch That the Estate in her is Conditional because these words ea intentione make a Condition in every Devise but not in a Feofment Gift or Grant unless it be in Case of the King And these words do amount as much as to say she should not convey it away to a Stranger but keep it and give it to his Sons S. Seised of Land in Fee holden in Socage and Devisable in Gavelkind Devised it to his Feme for her life paying 3 l. per annum to T. his Son during his life and that he should take but Two Load of Wood for Fire-boot And if she dyed before the said T. then he Devised all his Lands to R. his Son paying to the said T. 3 l. per annum and paying to such one of his Sisters 20 s. and to another Sister 20 s. The Feme dyes R. enters The Question was what Estate R. had by this Devise And it was Adjudged he had a Fee For when he Devised it to his Feme for life expresly c. and to R. generally without limiting the Estate and apppointed him to pay to T. 3 l. per annum during his life That carries in it an Intendment that he should have Fee especially when his Father therein further willed That his Son R. should pay two other Sums in Gross and none of them to be out of the Profits it is by Intendment and by Implication a Fee wherefore upon the first Argument it was Adjudged for the Defendant for they said That these Things which have been so often Adjudged ought
One Devised all his Lands to another and the Heirs of his Body begotten and after in the same Will Devised That if the Devisee die the said Lands should remain to another in Fee The Court held That the Devisee hath notwithstanding an Estate Tail by the first words and no Estate pass'd by the last words One Devised his Land to W. his Son for Term of his Life and after his decease to the Men-children of his Body and in case the said W. dyed without any Man-child of his Body that then the Land should remain to another c. The Testator dies W. dies without Issue Male of his Body c. and the Question was What Estate he had the Justices of the Bench held that he had an Estate to him and the Heirs Males of his Body F. Seised of Land in Gavelkind had Three Sons and Devised part to one part to another the other part to the Third and if either of them dyed without Issue the other should be his Heir It was Adjudged an Entail in each and a Fee-simple by the words Heir to other And so it was Adjudged Hill 32. Eliz. in Carters Case C. B. If a Devise be made to one and his Heirs and in Case that he hath Issue a Daughter that she shall have the Lands If the Devisee hath Issue a Son and a Daughter and die the Son shall have the Land and although the Daughter afterwards take a Husband and hath Issue a Son he shall not eject the other CHAP. XI Certain Cases in Law touching Devises of Land for Life only 1. A Devise of Land to one not saying How long is an Estate only for life 2. Power of Distraining Devised to one without other words on Non-payment of a certain Annual Sum is only an Estate for Life 3. A Devise of Land to one and his Heir in the Singular Number or to one and his Children is but an Estate for life 4. Several Instances of Law touching Estates only for Life by way of Devise 5. Several Instances of Estates for Life by Implication Devised 6. A Devise of Land to one thereby obliged to a present Payment Creates a Fee-simple But if Payment be to Issue out of the Profits of the Land Devised it makes only an Estate Tail 7. A Devise of an Estate for Life in Reversion 8. A Devise of Two Estates for Lives the one to some in Being the other to others in Reversion 9. A. Devise of Lands in Esse or Posse Conditioned upon an Annual Payment to be made by the Devisee during his or her life which Devise is made by one in the Remainder in Fee and not in Possession doth pass an Estate only for life 10. A Devise by general words of all a Mans Estate Mortgages c. may pass as to the Real no more than an Estate for Life and not a Fee by Implication 11. The Law ever accommodates the Testators words whatever they be as nigh as possible to his intent and meaning 1. IF a Man Deviseth his Land to A. B. and say not how long nor for what Time by this Devise A. B. hath an Estate only for Life in the Land But if a Man Devise his Land to A. B. and his Assigns without saying For ever it hath been a Question whether he hath only an Estate for Life as was held by some or a Fee-simple as hath been Affirmed by others 2. In the latter part of the last Chapt. it was said That it was an Estate Tail of the Rent if one Devised to A. B. that if he and the Heirs of his Body be not paid 20 l. Rent yearly he and they shall distrain But now if the Devise only be That if A. B. be not paid 20. l. yearly he shall distrain c. by this Devise A. B. hath only an Estate for Life Likewise if one devise a Rent of 10 l. out of his Land to be paid quarterly and say not how long the Rent shall continue this is but an Estate in the Rent only for Life 3. If one Devise his Land to A. B. for his Life or to him without any more words or to him and his Heir in the Singular Number or to him and his Children he then having Children By all these and such like Devises A. B. hath only an Estate for life in the thing Devised And if one Devise That A. B. shall have and occupy his Land in D. and say not how long by this Devise A. B. shall have the Land as aforesaid only for life But If I Devise that A. B. shall enter into my Land and say no more by this Devise A. B. hath no Estate at all but power to enter into the Land only 4. A Man having a Son and a Daughter dies Lands are Devised to the Daughter and the Heirs Females of the Body of the Father by this Devise the Daughter hath only an Estate for her life for there is no such person for she is not Heir Likewise if one Devise his Land in D. unto A. B. for life and after to the next right Heir in the Singular Number and to his right Heirs for ever by this Devise A. B. hath only an Estate for life Or if one Devise Land to A. B. for life and after to the next Heir Male of A. B. and to the Heirs Males of the Body of such next Heir Male by this Devise also A. B. hath but an Estate only for life But if he Devise his Land to A. B. for his life and after to the Heirs or to the right Heirs of A. B. by these Devises A. B. hath the Fee-simple of the Land And if it be to him for life and after to his Heirs Males then he hath an Estate Tail But if one Devise Land to F. G. and M. his Wife and after their decease or the Remainder to their Children by this Devise whether they have or have not Children at the time F. G. and M. his Wife have Estates only for their lives 5. If one Devise his Land to A. B. in Fee after the death of C. D. being his Son and Heir apparent by this Devise C. D. hath an Estate for life by Implication and till the Devise take effect the Law gives it to him by descent The Law is the same where one doth devise his Land to A. B. after the death of his Wife by this Devise the Wife hath an Estate for life by Implication Likewise if a Man Devise in this manner I give my Goods to my Wife and that after her decease my Son and Heir shall have the House where the goods are it is held That by this Devise the Wife hath an Estate for life in the House by Implication But if a Man Devise his Land to A. B. after the death of I. G. a Stranger to the Devisor it seems that by this Devise I. G. hath no Estate at all by Implication
and that this doth but set forth the Time when the Estate of A. B. shall begin and that the Intent of the Testator is That his Heir shall have it until that Time The Reason of the difference is because a Man is bound to provide for his own not so for a Stranger and so the Law presumes what Nature doth teach 6. If one Devise his Land in this manner viz. I give my Land in D. to A. B. to the intent that with the Profits thereof he shall bring up my Child or my Children or to the intent that with the Profits thereof he shall pay to I. M. 10 l. or to the intent that out of the Profits thereof he shall pay yearly 10 l. By these Devises A. B. hath only an Estate for life albeit the Payments to be made be greater than the Rents of the Land Otherwise it is in case the Sum of Money is to be paid presently and not appointed to be paid out of the Profits of the Land in which case A. B. should have a Fee-simple in the Land 7. If the Father of A. be Tenant for life of Land the Remainder to A. in Fee And A. devise the Land to his Wife Rendring for her natural life 5 l. to the right Heir of the Father of A. by this Devise the Wife of A. hath an Estate for life after the death of his Father 8. Land was Devised to Husband and Wife and after their decease to their Children they then having Issue a Son and a Daughter In this case the Husband and Wife have but an Estate for Term of their lives the Remainder to their Children for life and no Estate Tail for the intent of the Testator here shall be construed according to the Rules of the Common Law and by the Common Law the Husband and Wife have but an Estate for their lives with a Remainder to their Children for their lives 9. The Son Seised of a Remainder in Fee after the death of his Father who was Tenant for life devised the same by these Words viz. I Devise to D. my Wife the Lands which I have or may have in Reversion after the death of my Father paying therefore yearly during her life to the right Heirs of my Father 40 s. and dyed his Father living It was the Opinion of the Court That no Estate passed by this Devise but for Term of the life of the Wife and that she should not pay the 40 s. until the Reversion did fall after the death of the Father 10. A. Seised of divers Lands in A. B. and C. the Lands in C. being in him by Mortgage forfeited Devised the Lands in A. and B. to several Persons and then adds this Clause in his Will All the rest of the Goods Chattels Leases Estates Mortgages whereof he was possessed he devised to his Wife after his Debts and Legacies paid made his Wife his Executrix and dyed The Wife entered into the Mortgaged Lands and devised it to the Defendant and his Heirs and dyed The Question was whether the Fee passed to the Wife by this Devise by the Name of all his Estate Mortgages c. It was the Opinion of the whole Court That an Estate for life only passed unto her and not a Fee by Implication of the general words in the Will 11. Note That there is a difference when one Deviseth his Term for life the Remainder over and when a Man Deviseth the Land or his Lease or Farm or the Occupation or Use or Profits of his Land For in a Will the intent and meaning of the Devisor is to be observed and the Law makes construction of the Words to answer and satisfie his intent and puts them into such order that his Will shall take effect And when a Man deviseth his Lease to one for life it is as much as to say He shall have so many Years in it as he shall live and that if he dyeth within the Term that another shall have it for the Residue of the Years And although at the beginning it is uncertain how may Years he shall live yet when he dyeth it is certain how many Years he hath lived and how many Years the other shall have and so by a subsequent Act all is made certain A Man made his Will in this manner Item I give my Mannor of Dale to my second Son Item I give my Mannor of Sale to my said Son and his Heirs what Estate he had in the Mannor of Dale was the Question It was held by Dyer Weston and Welch That in the first he had but an Estate for life for that it is as much as to say as if he would give his Mannor of Dale to him for his life for that as much is included therein without saying His Heirs And that Item seems a new Gift to a greater degree in the second place to make amends for the other Brown e Contra and that the Item is a Conjuntion Copulative and that the word Heirs expressed in the latter Clause extends to both the Mannors But if the Word Heirs were put in the Gift of the former Lands it would be otherwise Dyer if in the first place or Clause there were not any person named but that the words were Item I give the Mannor of D. Item I give the Mannor of S. to I. K. and his Heirs there and in that Case it would refer to both the Mannors W. C. by his Will Devised a Messuage in these words viz. I give to A. L. my Cousin the Fee-simple of my House and after her decease to W. her Son The Judges held That A. L. had an Estate for life and her Son a Fee-simple in Remainder And so it was adjudged R. D. Seised in Fee of a House and Possess'd of Goods made his Will in these words viz. The rest of my Goods Lands and Moveables whatsoever after my Debts Legacies and Funeralls paid to my Three Children I. T. and M. equally to be divided amongst them And it was Adjudged That they have an Estate only for life in the House and are Tenants in Common not Joynt-tenants CHAP. XII Certain Cases in the Law touching Devises of Leases or for a Term of Years 1. In what Case the Word Shall is taken for Should in Devise of a Term. 2. A Devise of Lands for 99. Years may be only for no more of that Term then the Issue Male of the Devisee shall continue 3. The Devise of a Term to one and his Heirs shall go to the Devisees Executors or Administrators and not to his Heirs 4. Chattel-Leases and Leases for Years pass not by a Devise of all his Lands and Tenements 5. By a Lease for Years Devised for Life doth pass the whole Term yet is it not an Estate for Life 6. The whole Interest of a Lessee in his Lease-Lands doth pass by a Devise of his Lease Term Farm Profits Tenure or Occupation thereof as
in Case of Lands Conditionally devised to one and his Heirs for ever or for life the Heir of the Devisor shall keep the Land till the contingent Condition happen to take effect 2. If one Devise Land of the value of 100 l. per annum to A. for life the Remainder to B. paying 50 l. to C. by this Devise B. shall have the Fee-simple of the Remainder upon Condition 3. If one Devise his Land to his Wife for her life and if she live till his Son come to the Age of 25. Years that then he shall have the Land and if she die before he comes to that Age that then A. B. shall have it till his Son come to that Age. A. B. dies before the Wife and after she dies before the Son comes to the Age of 25. Years In this Case the Executors of A. B. shall not have the Land till the Son comes to the Age of 25. Years 4. A. Seised of Lands in Fee had Issue Six Sons and one Daughter and Devised the said Lands to I. S. for 90. Years if the said I. S. and G. his Wife or any of them should so long live the Remainder to P. his Eldest Son and the Heirs Male of his Body the Remainder to these other Sons the Remainder to his Daughter Provided that if the said P. his Son or any of the Sons of the said Devisor or any of the Heirs Males of their Body should endeavour by any Act to Alien Bargain or Discontinue then after such Attempt or Endeavour and before any such Bargain Sale c. were Executed that the Estate of such person attempting c. should cease as if he were naturally dead and that then the Premises should descend remain and come to such person to whom the same ought to come remain and be by the intent and meaning of his Will and dyed P. Levyed a Fine of the Lands he in the next Remainder entered and claimed the Reversion by force of the Devise It was Adjudged in this Case That the Conuzee had the Reversion in him and might maintain an Action of wast because the Proviso of Restraint in the Will of A. was void and repugnant to Law and a Proviso Condition or Limitation ought to defeat the whole Estate and it cannot continue it for part and defeat it for the Residue 5. A Copy-holder of Lands in Borough-English having Three Sons and one Daughter Deviseth his Lands to his Eldest Son paying to his Daughter and every one of his other Sons Five Pounds within Two Years and surrendred to the use of his Will The Eldest Son was admitted and did not pay the Five Pounds within Two Years In this Case it was Resolved 1 That although the yearly Profits of the Lands for Two Year did exceed the Money to be paid yet the Eldest Son had a Fee-simple 2 Although this word Paying in the Case of a Will makes a Condition yet in this Case the Law shall Construe this unapt word Paying a Limitation For if it should be a Condition the same should descend to the Eldest Son and then it should be at his pleasure whether the Daughter or Brothers should be paid or not and therefore in this Case the Law should judg the same a Limitation of which the youngest Son should take advantage 6. A Man Devised Lands to his Wife upon Condition that she should bring up his Son at School c. and that after the death of his Wife the Land should remain to his second Son in Fee and dyed The Wife entered the Condition was broken the Eldest Son after his full Age entered for the Condition broken in this Case it was held 1 That a Condition might be annexed to a will by the Stat. of 32. H. 8. of Wills which gives liberty to a Man to Devise for the advancement of his Wife c. That a particular Estate may be upon Condition though the Remainder be without Condition 3 That he in the Remainder should not take advantage of the Condition but the Heir because he is prejudiced in the Inheritance by the Devise 7. If a Man make Two Men his Executors Proviso that one of them shall not Administer his Goods the Proviso is void because it restrains the Authority which was given by the first part of the will and agrees not with the Law for by Law every Executor may Administer the Goods And such was the Opinion of Baldwin and Egglesfield But Fitzh conceived the Proviso to be good for that he might bring an Action although he did not Administer 8. A Man Seised of Tenements in London Devised the same to Two Persons upon Condition that they should pay to his Wife 10 l. per annum issuing out of the said Tenements at Two Feasts and if the Rent be behind by the space of Six Weeks being demanded that it should be lawful for the Wife to distrain It was held a good Condition and that if the Rent be behind yet the Wife cannot distrain before a demand of the Rent but the Heir of the Husband might enter for the condition broken though the Wife did not demand the Rent A Man Devised his Land to his Younger Son when he should accomplish the Age of 24. Years upon Condition that he should pay 20 l. to the Daughter of the Devisor and if he shall die before the Age of 24. Years then his Eldest Son shall have the Land upon Condition that he pay the said 20 l. and if both his Sons failed that the Land should remain to his Daughter and dyed The Younger Son entered after 24. Years of Age and did not pay the 20 l. to the Daughter the Eldest Brother entered upon him It was Resolved by the Court in this Case That the same was a Limitation and not a Condition and therefore the entry of the Elder Brother was not lawful 10. A Man made a Lease for Years upon Condition That if the Lessee shall Demise the Premises or any part of it other than for one Year to any person or persons then the Lessor and his Heirs to re-enter the Lessee afterwards Devised it by his Will to his Son It was held by the Court That it was a breach of the Condition 11. If Lands be Devised upon Condition of superstitious Uses as to find a Chaplain to say Mass or the like superstitious Uses mentioned in the Will the Remainder over for the like Uses and if they in Remainder perform not the Condition then to forfeit their Estate and the Lands to remain to the right Heirs of the Devisor In this Case it was held That although the Land was Devised but Conditionally to find a Priest to say Mass yet that it was within the Stat. of 1. Ed. 6. Cap. 13. whereby the Lands were vested in the Crown because the said Uses were superstitious Uses to which the Condition of the Devised Lands did refer F. C. Seised of the Mannor of S.
this case she hath those Lands for life and she having no Issue hath not any Interest to dispose but hath an Authority to nominate two who shall dispose of the Lands and they may make Sale thereof 9. A man did Devise his Lands which were held in Socage to be sold by his Executors and that the Money thereof coming should be disposed of in payment of special Legacies which he Appointed by his said Will the Executors sold the Lands One of the Legatees after the Will was Proved sued the Executors in the Ecclesiastical Court for his Legacy whereupon a Prohibition was prayed It was resolved in that Case 1 That the Money was Assets in the Executors hands 2 That there was no Remedy for it but by Suit in the Ecclesiastical Court and therefore a Prohibition did not lye in the Case But Querie of the second payment for it was held by all the Justices of both Benches Where a man Deviseth that his Executors shall sell Lands and of the Money coming shall give such a Portion to his Daughter That this was not a Legacy because going out of Lands and that Suit did not lye for it in the Ecclesiastical Court But an Accompt lyes at Law for the Money And therefore in that case a Prohibition was granted to stay the Suit in the Ecclesiastical Court 10. A Devise was made to A. B. for life the Remainder to C. D. in tayle and if C. D. dye without Issue of his body that then the Land shall be sold by his Executors he maketh two Executors and dyeth A. B. dyeth C. D. dyeth without Issue of his body In this case it seemeth that one of these Executors alone can not sell the Lands 11. A man Devised his Lands to his Wife for term of her life the Remainder to D. his Daughter in tayle and if she dyed without Issue that then after the death of his Wife the Lands should be sold for the best value by his Executors with the Assent of A. and B. And made his Wife and a Stranger his Executors and dyed the Wife Entered and dyed A. and B. dyed and the Executor who survived sold the Land alone The Opinion of the Court was That the Sale was not good because he wanted sufficient Authority 12. A man seised of divers Mannors and Lands Devised all the said Mannors and Lands to his Sister and her Heirs for ever Except out of this General Grant my Mannor of R. which I do Appoint to pay my Debts and made two Executors by Name and dyed One of the Executors dyed the other took upon him the charge and Execution of the Will and afterward sold the Mannor of R. for 300 l. for the purpose aforesaid in Fee It was the Opinion of the Court that he might well sell it for by the Circumstances it appeareth That such was the Testators intent and not to leave the Reversion to Discend to his Heir but to trust his Executors with the Sale of it for the payment of his Debts 13. A. made B. and C. his Executors and by his Will appointed that they should have and hold the Issues and Profits of his Lands until his Heir should come to the age of 21 years to the intent that the Executors with the Profits thereof should pay his Debts and Legacies and bring up his Children One of the Executors dyed the surviving Executor made his Executor and dyed also the Heir being within age It was the Opinion of the Court in this case that the Executor of the survivor might receive the profits of the Lands and dispose of them during the Non-age of the Heir because it was an Interest in the Executors and not an Authority or a Trust only 14. If a man hath Feoffees and makes his Will That his Executors shall alien his Land if the Executors Refuse the Administration of his Goods yet they may sell the Lands because the Will is not of a thing Testamentary But the Executors have not a power to meddle with the Land unless such a special power be given to them If a man makes his Will of his Lands and that his Executors without naming them by their proper Names shall sell them if they refuse to be Executors yet they may sell the Land But if a man makes his Will that his Lands which his Feoffees have shall be sold and doth not say by whom the Executors shall sell the same and not his Feoffees because the Moneys which come by the Sale shall be Assets in the hands of the Executors which is a proof that they may sell them And if his Will be That the Executors shall sell the Lands before the Alienation the Heir may take and Receive the profits thereof and if no Sale be made the Heir shall hold the Land for ever 15. A man Deviseth That his Executors shall sell his Lands Now by the Stat. of 21. H. 8. cap. 4. If the one refuseth the other may sell the Lands but the Sale can not be made to him who refuseth 16. A man made his Will and made A. B. C. D. his Executors and Devised his Lands to the said A. B. C. D. by their special Names and to their Heirs And further Devised that the Devisees should sell the Lands to F. G. if he would give for it before such a day 100 l. and if he would not that then they should sell it to any other to the performance of his Will viz. the payment of his Debts F. G. would not give the 100 l. one of the Executors refused to intermeddle the other three sold the Land It was the Opinion of the Court that the same being a special and a Joynt-Trust that it could not survive and that the Sale by the Three was void 17. By the Premises it is Evident That if a man Willeth that his Executors shall sell his Lands for the payment of his Debts and they all dye but one and the survivor make the Sale the Vendee shall not have the Land and that the Law is otherwise if the Lands were Devised to the Executors to be sold The Reason is as aforesaid because in the former case the Executors have only an Authority in the other case they have an Interest But if a man maketh two Executors and willeth that they shall sell the Lands for the payment of his Debts And they sell it only for term of life the Remainder to one of themselves and the Vendee dyeth he in the Remainder may Enter Sed Q. CHAP. XVII Of Legacies and Devises in respect of Marriage As also Between Husband and Wife 1. A Condition of Marriage may be annexed to a Legacy but an unlawful Condition thereof is void and doth not prejudice the same 2. A Condition of Marriage with the Consent of a Third person doth oblige the Legatary to Marry if he will have the Legacy but doth not oblige him to have such Consent 3. A
Son to his Mother 10. A man bequeaths the House wherein he lives to A. B. his Wife quamdiu she shall continue a Widdow and dyes A. B. doth not Re-marry but lives and dyes a Widdow In this case the said House by the Civil Law comes to A. B. and his Heirs for ever Note that what in the premises hath been said touching the invallidity of Conditions against Marriage annexed to Legacies in relation to Females holds the same in Law touching the like illegal Conditions in reference to Males or Masculines 11. A man Devised to his Daughter 500 l. towards her Marriage In this Case it was the Opinion of the Court That if she die before Marriage her Executors shall have it But if the words were To be paid at the day of her Marriage or at the age of 21 years and she dyeth before both it is otherwise The latter part of which Judgment seems not to agree with the Civil Law in that point which sayes the time of the age of a Legatary may be joyned either to the substance of the Legacy or to the execution and performance of the same if the time of the age of the Legatary be joyned to the substance of the Legacy as when the Testator doth give thee 100 l. when thou shalt be of the age of 21 years In this case if thou dyest before that time thy Executors cannot recover the 100 l. But if the time of the age of the Legatary be joyned only to the execution or performance of the Legacy as when the Testator doth give thee 100 l. which he willeth shall be paid when thou accomplish the age of 21 years In this case although thou dye before thou accomplish the age of 21 years yet thy Executors or Administrators shall recover the same when the time is accomplished wherein thy self if thou hadst been then living mightst have recovered the same 12. Consonant whereunto is that which we find Reported viz. That it was agreed by the Court That if a man Deviseth to his Daughter 100 l. when she shall be Married or to his Son when he shall be of full age and they dye before the time appointed and make Executors their Executors shall not have it But it is otherwise if the Devise were to them to be paid at their full ages and they dye before that time and make Executors there the Executors shall have it Which difference was since likewise so Agreed and Adjudged 13. A Feme Sole Deviseth Lands to A. B. in Fee to whom afterwards she was Married and during the Coverture Countermands her Will saying her Husband should not have the Land nor any other benefit by her Will and dyes In this case the Husband shall not have the Land not only because of her Countermand but because of the disability of a Feme Covert to make a Will which takes no effect till the parties death And therefore if a Feme sole Deviseth Lands to a man and then takes him to Husband and dyes This Inter-marriage is a reversion of the Devise and the Heir of the Woman shall have the Lands and not the Husband because after Marriage the Will of the Wife in Judgment of Law is subject to the Will of her Husband and a Feme Covert hath not any Will for the making of the Will is but the Inception thereof and takes no effect till the death of the Devisor 14. If a man Deviseth Lands generally to his Wife for the Term of her life It cannot be averred to be for the Joynture of the Wife and in satisfaction of her Dower But if a man Deviseth Lands to his Wife for life or in tail for her Joynture and in satisfaction of her Dower the same is a good Joynture within the Stat. of 27 H. 8. 15. A man Devised the Moiety of his Goods to his Wife and dyed It was the opinion of the Court That she should have the Moiety of them as they were at the time of his death if his Executors had Assets sufficient to pay his Debts If a Legacy be given to a Woman Covert and her Husband give a Release and afterwards he and his Wife sue in the Ecclesiastical Court for the Legacy the party sued shall not have a Prohibition upon the Husbands Release because the Temporal Judges cannot meddle with a Legacy nor consequently determine whether the Release will extinguish the same As the Case 29 Eliz. Adjudged The Husband may Devise to his Wife although they are but one person in Law for it takes no effect till after his Death CHAP. XVIII Of Legacies and Devices to a Child in the Womb. 1. A Devise to an Infant in the Womb is good 2. It may be good though the Infant be rip'd alive out of the Womb. 3. It is good though it be a Devise in Remainder or in Tail 4. How the Divident of a Devise shall be in case of Twins unexpected or an Hermophrodite 5. How the Legacy shall be apportioned when bequeathed to any Child in the Womb and more then One or Two happen to be Born 6. Where a Devise void or voidable in his Inception may become good by matter ex post facto 1. THat a Child in the Womb to whom a Legacy is bequeathed or Lands Divised is after his or her Birth though subsequent to the Testators death capable of taking by such Devise is a Truth now not to be controverted though it hath been Contradicted and otherwise Resolved for we find it Reported in a Case thus stated viz. A Man had Issue Five Sons his Wife being with Child with the Sixth at the time of his death and by his last Will declared That the Third Part of his Land should descend and come to his Son and Heir the other Two Parts he bequeathed to his Four Younger Sons by Name and to the Heirs Males of their Bodies and if the Infant in the Mothers Womb be a Son then he to have a Fifth Part as Co-heir with his Four Elder Brothers The Sixth Son was Born after the death of his Father in this Case it was Resolved That the Son Born after the death of the Father should not have any thing because he was uncapable as a Purchasor when the Devise was first to take effect because he was not then in esse or rerum natura Notwithstanding which it was not long after in another Case otherwise understood in which Case it was Admitted That a Devise to an Infant in his Mothers Belly was good It is presumed the intendment is of such an Infant as was born after the Testators death In other Cases also it hath been held That Devise to an Infant in his Mothers Belly is good 2. A Man Deviseth his Land to his Wife being with Child the Remainder to the Issue en ventre safeme his Wife in Travail dyeth and the Son is rip'd from his Mother alive he shall have the said Remainder
as 8 El. 4. 3. And Nichols Justice said That a Personal Action once suspended by the act of the party as here by the act of the Obligee in making the Wife of one of the Obligors his Executrix shall be Extinct for ever otherwise if by the act of Law And it seemed to the Court That by the last clause of the Devise of all his Goods to the Wife after his Debts and Legacies paid the Obligation passed to the Wife And inasmuch as that the duty and debt thereof is a thing in action which by our Law cannot be transferred by a Devise yet it shall enure as a Declaration of the intent of the Obligor that the debt is extinct and the Civil Law allows a Devise of debts due to the Testator to be good And it is averred in the Principal Case That the Debts and Legacies are all paid whereupon Judgement was given Quòd quaerens nihil capiat c. The suggestion was That whereas one was in debt to J. S. in Thirty pound who after by deed of Gift in his life-time conveyed all his Goods and Chattels to A. and after made the Plaintiff and B. his Executors and devised that the Plaintiff should pay out of the Thirty pound which he owed him Ten pound to the Defendant for a Legacy who brought the Plaintiff into the Ecclesiastical Court for the same where by the Law the Thirty pound debt is extinct by making the Plaintiff Executor and shewed that he had Proved the Will c. And per Curiam the Defendant shall have a Consultation forasmuch as the joynt-Executor hath no remedy to recover the Thirty pound against the Plaintiff his Co-Executor nor can have any Action for the same during the Plaintiffs life yet the debt not extinct but remains as Assets to any other Creditor as is 8 E. 4. And by the same reason that one debt shall satisfie another debt it shall satisfie a Legacy also and much the rather in regard the express intent of the Testator was to that purpose having precisely limited the Legacy to be paid out of the debt Quod not a per totam Curiam And Consultation was granted accordingly Yelv. Council for the Plaintiff CHAP. XII The general difference between an Executor and an Administrator and wherein they generally agree THey differ thus viz. An Executor is made either by the Testator or by his own Acts but an Administrator is appointed only by the Judge An Executor may appoint an Executor to the first Testator so cannot an Administrator yet a bare and meer Executor or a naked Executor to whom nothing is bequeathed in the Will made choice of meerly for his care and not at all for his profit cannot bequeath the Testators Goods in his Will by Legacies no more than an Administrator for these Goods are to be imployed only for the behoof of the Testator in which respect such Executor is accountable as well as an Administrator But of the Profits and Fruits which happen and arise of those Goods which belong to any as Executor he may make his Testament though not of the Goods themselves and so also in some cases may an Administrator They agree thus viz. An Administrator is entitled to all the Goods and Chattels of the Intestate as well as an Executor to all the Goods and Chattels that belonged to the Testator they are both alike liable to the payment of Debts and Legacies and they are both accountable These are the most general things wherein they differ and agree Their more particular agreements and disagreements are very many according to their distinct Beings Interests and Offices For which reason the Reader for his fuller satisfaction in this point is referred to his own Observations from the Contents of the several Chapters of this Testamentary Treatise CHAP. XIII Of the Executors Rights exclusively to the Heirs 1. The several divisions and distinctions of such things as come to the Executor and what Chattels are 2. Of such Chattels real living and moveable as accrew to the Executor 3. Of such Chattels real without life and immoveable as go to the Executor 4. Of Chattels personal living and moveable belonging to the Executor 5. Of Chattels personal without life and moveable pertaining to the Executor 6. Several Laws in reference to this subject 1. ALL things that come unto an Executor may be divided into things possessory and actually in the Testator or into things only in action and not actually in him and the things possessory may be divided into Chattels real and immoveable or into Chattels personal and moveable Again the possessory Chattels real may be divided into things living or into things without life Also the personal Chattels or Goods moveable may be divided into things living or things inanimate and without life There are also comprehensive of some of these Chattels principal and Chattels accessory that follow the principal So that Chattels are all possessions of Goods moveable and unmoveable except such as are in the nature of a Free-hold or parcel of it And they are called real or immoveable either because they are such in their own nature or because they appertain to something real by way of dependance as a Box with writings of Land the body of a Ward the fruit of a Tree or the Tree it self upon the Land or because they issue out of things immoveable and of a more real nature as Leases for years at Will Wardships Tenants Estates by Statute Merchant Staple or Elegit and Grants of the next Advowson 2. The Chattels Real Living and Moveable which did accrew to the Executor were such as these viz. Wardship being a real Chattel in respect of a Tenure of Land whereby was intended such Wardship as was by Knights Service and not such as is by Socage Tenure also a Villain for years as by Grant for a Term from him that had the Inheritance 3. The Chattels Real without Life and Immoveable that go to the Executors are generally and for the most part in Houses or Lands by Lease or extent upon Judgements Statutes or Recognizances or in things issuing out of Houses or Lands as Rents Commons and the like as arrerages of Rent behind at the Testators death also Advowsons Tithes Fairs Markets Profits of Leets and the like which the Testator had only for years Also the Title accrewed to the Crown upon Attainder of Felony where the party held not of the King viz. the Annum Diem Vastum that is power not only to take the Profits for a year but also to wast and demolish c. is but a Chattel And therefore though granted to one and his Heirs by the King yet shall go to the Executor not to the Heir Also a Lease for years determinable upon lives which is a Chattel and shall go to the Executor As also doth an Extent upon a Statute Likewise if a Termer for years grant his Term by Bequest or otherwise to A. and his Heirs