the contrary thereof in any wise notwithstanding This Branch seems not to extend to all forfeitures for Recusancy For the power here given the Lord Treasurer To what cases of Conviction this Clause extends and to what not c. is only in relation to those forfeitures which are by this Act appointed to be paid into the Receipt of the Exchequer which are the forfeitures due to the Queen by Conviction upon Indictment for this Act meddles with no other so that if the twenty pounds per month be recovered in a popular Suit by the Informer Qui tam c. one third part thereof ought still to be paid to the Poor of the Parish only according to 23 Eliz. cap. 1. notwithstanding this Act. Provided always That this Act Stat. Sect. 9. Assurances made bona fide not to be impeached or any thing therein contained shall not in any wise extend or be construed to make void or impeach any Grant or Lease heretofore to be made bona fide without fraud or covin whereupon any yearly Rent or payment is reserved or payable or any Grant or Lease hereafter to be made bona fide without fraud or covin whereupon the accustomed yearly Rent or more shall be reserved or any other Conveyance Assurance or Assignment whatsoever heretofore made bona fide upon good consideration and without fraud or covin which is not or shall not be revokable at the pleasure of such Offender otherwise then to give benefit and title to her Majesty her Heirs and Successors to have perceive and enjoy such Rents and Payments during the continuance of such Lease or Grant according to the true meaning of this Act. Seizure of Lands whereof the Offender hath but an Estate for life or in his Wives right And provided also That this Act or any thing therein contained shall not in any wise extend or be construed to continue any seizure of any Lands or Tenements of such Offender in her Majesties hands or in the hands of her Heirs or Successors after the said Offenders death which Lands or Tenements he shall have or be seized of only for term of his life or in the Right of his Wife Any thing in this Act to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding Stat. xxxv Eliz. cap. i. An Act to retain the Queens Majesties Subjects in their due Obedience FOR preventing and avoiding of such great inconveniencies and perils as might happen and grow by the wicked and dangerous practices of seditious Sectaries and disloyal persons Stat. Sect. 1. The penalty of a Recusant perswading others to impugne the Queens Ecclesiastical power Be it Enacted by the Queéns most Excellent Majesty and by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same That if any person or persons above the age of sixteen years which shall obstinately refuse to repair to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer to hear Divine Service established by her Majesties Laws and Statutes in that behalf made and shall forbear to do the same by the space of a month next after without any lawful cause shall at any time after forty days next after the end of this Session of Parliament by Printing Writing or express words or speéches advisedly or purposely practise or go about to move or perswade any of her Majesties Subjects or any other within her Highness Realms or Dominions to deny withstand and impugne her Majesties Power and Authority in cases Ecclesiastical united and annexed to the Imperial Crown of this Realm or to that end or purpose shall advisedly and maliciously move or perswade any other person whatsoever to forbear or abstain from coming to Church to hear Divine Service Or to forbear coming to Church or to receive the Communion according to her Majesties Laws and Statutes aforesaid or to come to or to be present at any unlawful Assemblies Conventicles or Meétings under colour or pretence of any exercise of Religion Or to be present at unlawful Conventicles contrary to her Majesties said Laws and Statutes Or if any person or persons which shall obstinately refuse to repair to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer and shall forbear by the space of a month to hear Divine Service as is aforesaid shall after the said forty days either of him or themselves or by the motion perswasion inticement or allurement of any other willingly joyn in or be present at any such Assemblies Conventicles or Méetings under colour or pretence of any such exercise of Religion contrary to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm as is aforesaid That then every such person so offending as aforesaid and being thereof lawfully convicted shall be committed to Prison there to remain without Bail or Mainprize until they shall conform and yield themselves to come to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer and hear Divine Service according to her Majesties Laws and Statutes aforesaid and to make such open submission and Declaration of their said Conformity as hereafter in this Act is declared and appointed Which shall obstinately refuse to repair c. shall c. by Printing c. Wingate in abridging of this Statute tit Crowne numb 70. saith that if any person above sixteen years of age obstinately refuses to come to Church for a month or impugnes the Queens Authority in Causes Ecclesiastical he shall be committed to Prison which is a great mistake for no man shall be punished by this Act for either of those Causes only The not coming to Church being only a precedent Qualification required in the person whom the Act makes liable to the penalties thereof for the other offences therein mentioned Who may be an offender within this Act and who not And therefore if a man never comes to Church yet he is no offender within this Act unless he advisedly or purposely move or perswade another to deny or impugne the Kings Authority in Causes Ecclesiastical or to that end or purpose advisedly and maliciously move or perswade some other to forbear to come to Church or receive the Communion or to be present at Conventicles c. or he himself be present at such Conventicles c. And on the other hand if a man move or perswade any other to deny or impugne the Kings Authority in Causes Ecclesiastical or to forbear to come to Church or receive the Communion or to be present at Conventicles c. or if he himself be present at any Conventicles c. yet he is no Offender within this Act if he goes to Church once within the compass of a month so that the party must both forbear to come to Church and be guilty of some other of the offences here enumerated or he is not punishable by this Act And as for the denying or impugning the Kings Authority in Causes Ecclesiastical it s no offence within this Statute unless the party moves or
sue And as for Sir Edward Cokes Opinion that since the said Statute of 21 Jac. the Courts at Westminster cannot receive or hold Plea of any Information brought by a common Informer not only common Experience ever since that Statute is against it but the Judgments and Resolutions both of the Kings Bench Mich. 4 Car. 1. in the Case of Greene and Guy upon the Statute of 21 H. 8. cap. 13. of Non-residence Stat. 21 H. 8. 13. and of the Common Pleas. Trin. 4 Car. 1. in the Case of Farrington and Leymer upon the Statute of 23 H. 8. cap. 4. of Brewers 23 H. 8. 4. are directly in point contrary thereunto Cro. Car. 146. ibid. 112 113. Hutton 99. And so is the Opinion of Rolles upon the Statute of 7 E. 6. cap. 5. 7 E. 6. 5. of Selling Wines without Licence Styles 340. Buckstone against Shurlock and the Resolution in Jones 193. And yet although in penal Statutes any Court of Record shall be restrained to the ordinary Courts of Record at Westminster In what Statutes Courts of Record may be taken in a large sense possibly in other Statutes those words may admit of a larger Construction Vide Rolles 1. 51. C. 21. Floyde versus Beste By Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information An Informer may sue upon this Statute by Bill Stat. 18 Eliz. 5. By the Statute of 18 Eliz. cap. 5. it is Enacted That none shall be admitted or received to pursue against any person upon any penal Statute but by way of Information or original Action and not otherwise Vide Co. 6. 19 20. Gregories Case Moore 412. C. 565. 600. C. 827. the same Case Cro. Hill 39 Eliz. 544. Gadley versus Whitecot And this seems to extend to as well penal Statutes made afterwards as to those which were in force when the said Act was made For 't is usual for a later Act of Parliament to be guided by a former of which see several Instances in Vernons Case Co. 4.4 But then that must be in such Cases where there are not express words in the later Act to controul the former And therefore although the words of 18 Eliz. be in the Negative that the Informer shall not pursue otherwise then by Information or original Action yet the Affirmative words of this subsequent Statute of 23 Eliz. that the Informer may Sue by Bill hath taken away the force of that Negative in 18 in relation to the Offences mentioned in 23. And the prosecutor Qui tam c. upon this Statute may Sue by Bill in the Kings-Bench as well as by Information which otherwise had there been no direct words here to that purpose he could not do as it seems by the resolution given in Woodson and Clarks Case in a Suit brought by Bill in the Kings-Bench 23 H. 6. 10. upon the Statute of 23 H. 6. cap. 10. of Sheriffs Co. 3. Inst 194. and in Vdeson and the Mayor of Nottinghams Case Moore 248. C. 390. contrary to the opinion in Styles 381. 382. Hill against Dechair Within threé months after Iudgment thereof given shall be committed to Prison Qui non habet in aere luet in corpore The Judgment shall be absolute And yet the Judgment in this Case shall be absolute that the King and Informer recover c. Anderson 1. 140. C. 190. Vachels Case A Feme Covert Feme Covert Recusant if the forfeiture be not paid within the time here limited may be imprisoned by force of this Statute until she pay or conform Co. 11. 61. Dr. Fosters Case Hobart 97. Moore vesus Hussey And if she be convicted upon Indictment at the Kings Suit in which Case the Husband is not bound to pay the penalty she ought by the opinion of Manword to have hard and close Imprisonment Imprisoned and be sequestred from all Company until she conform or the forfeiture be paid Savile 25. C. 59. But if the Husband and Wife be Sued upon this Statute in a popular Action or Information for the Recusancy of the Wife Her Husband chargeable and Judgment be had against them and the forfeiture is not paid within the three months the Husband in that Case may be imprisoned likewise Savile 25. C. 59. Stat. Sect. 10. Service in a mans private House Provided also That every person which usually on the Sunday shall have in his or her house the Divine Service which is established by the Law of this Realm and be thereat himself or her self usually or most commonly present and shall not obstinately refuse to come to Church and there to do as is aforesaid and shall also four times in the year at the least be present at the Divine Service in the Church of the Parish where he or she shall be resident or in some other open Common Church or such Chappel of ease shall not incur any pain or penalty limited by this Act for not repairing to Church Stat. Sect. 11. Fraudulent Assurances to defeat forfeitures And be it likewise Enacted and Declared That every Grant Conveyance Bond Iudgment and Execution had or made since the beginning of this Session of Parliament or hereafter to be had or made of Covinous purpose to defraud any interest right or title that may or ought to grow to the Queén or to any other person by means of any Conviction or Iudgment by vertue of this Statute or of the said Statute of the said thirteenth year shall be and be adjudged to be utterly void against the Quéen and against such as shall Sue for any part of the said penalties in form aforesaid Since the beginning of this Session of Parliament And yet a Covenons Conveyance though made before that Session of Parliament should not have defeated the interest Fraudulent conveyances right or title which was given to the Queen by this Statute And therefore in the Case or Sir John Southwell who in An. 19 Eliz. conveyed his lands to certain Feoffees and their heirs in Trust for the maintenance of him and his Family marriage of his Daughters payment of his Debts c. and to answer to him the Surplusage of the mean profits with a Clause of Revocation after which he granted Trees took fines for Leases c. and then came this Statute upon which he was Indicted and Convicted It was resolved by all the Judges of England that the said Lands were liable to this Statute and the Jurors charged to inquire what Lands he had were committed to the Fleet and fined each of them Fifty pounds for that they would not find those Lands to be his Leonard 3. 147. 148. By means of any Conviction or Iudgment Pauncefoot being Indicted of Recusancy A 〈◊〉 Outlawâ—â—â— made a Deed of Gift of all his Leases and Goods to a great value coloured over with fained considerations to defeat the Queen of what might accrew to her by his recusancy or flight and then went beyond Sea and afterwards was
the Reign of our most gracious Soveraign Lady the Quéens Majesty Entituled An Act to retain the Queens Majesties Subjects in their due Obedience Be it Enacted by Authority of this present Parliament That every Feoffment Gift Grant Conveyance Alienation Estate Lease Incumbrance and Limitation of use of or out of any Lands Tenements or Hereditaments whatsoever had or made at any time since the beginning of the Quéens Majesties Reign or at any time hereafter to be had or made by any person which hath not repaired or shall not repair to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer but hath forborn or shall forbear the same contrary to the tenor of the said Statute and which is or shall be revocable at the pleasure of such offender or in any wise directly or indirectly meant or intended to or for the behoof relief or maintenance or at the disposition of any such offender or wherewith or whereby or in consideration whereof such Offender or his Family shall be maintained relieved or kept shall be déemed and taken to be utterly frustrate and void as against the Queéns Majesty for or concerning the levying and paying of such sums of money as any such person by the Laws or Statutes of this Realm already made ought to pay or forfeit for not coming or repairing to any Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer or for saying hearing or being at any Mass and shall also be seized and had to and for her Majesties use and behoof as hereafter in this Act is mentioned Any pretence colour faigned consideration or expressing of any use to the contrary notwithstanding Stat. Sect. 2. Conviction of Recusancy shall be certified into the Exchequer And further be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That every Conviction heretofore recorded for any Offence before-mentioned not already estreated or certified into the Quéens Majesties Court of Exchequer shall from the Iustices before whom the Record of such Conviction shall be remaining be estreated and certified into the Queéns Majesties Court of Exchequer before the end of Easter Term next coming in such convenient certainty for the time and other circumstances as the Court of Exchequer may thereupon award out Process for seizure of the Lands and Goods of every such Offender as hath not paid their said forfeitures according to the Laws and Statutes in such Case provided In what Courts Conviction of Recusancy shall be And that every Conviction hereafter for any offence before mentioned shall be in the Court commonly called the Kings Bench or at the Assizes or general Goal delivery and not elsewhere and shall from the Iustices before whom the Record of such Conviction shall remain be estreated and certified into the said Court of Exchequer before the end of the Term next ensuing after every such Conviction in such convenient certainty as is aforementioned Sir Edward Coke in Dr. Fosters Case lib. 11. 61. saith That by this Clause as hath been well observed the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 33 Eliz. 1 In what Courts the Informer Qui tam c. may sue is altered in a material point viz. That whereas by 23. the Informer might sue the Recusant for the penalty in any Court of Record he is now by this Statute of 29. restrained from suing in the Common Pleas or Exchequer But this is utterly denied to be Law as the constant practice and experience ever since the making of this Statute sufficiently testifies And the Lord Chief Justice Hobart in his Report of Pie and Lovells Case saith That that Observation was made as he takes it by Sir Edward Coke himself But however this passage or observation as he calls it came to be inserted by Sir Edward Coke into his Report Sergeant Rolles in his Report of that Case of Dr. Foster lib. 1. 93. C. 41. brings him in speaking in another Language and more consonant to Law viz. That the Conviction here mentioned is intended of Convictions upon Indictments only and that no other sort of Convictions or proceedings upon the Statute of 23 Eliz. are mentioned or intended throughout this whole Act of 29. And if so then the Informer is not concerned in this Act nor restrained thereby as to the Courts wherein he is to sue but that he may sue still in the Common Pleas or Exchequer And so was it resolved in point in that Case of Pie and Lovell Hobart 204 205. where the Opinion of Sir Edward Coke reported by Rolles touching what sort of Conviction is meant here is confirmed and allowed for Law this Statute being made only for the benefit of the Queen in her Suits by Indictment and that other Opinion in the 11 Report exploded And the true reason is there given why those negative words and not elsewhere were added here viz. not to exclude the Informer out of the Common Pleas or Exchequer but to restrain Justices of Peace from proceeding to convict any person upon Indictments for Recusancy or for saying hearing or being at Mass which they were enabled to do by 23 Eliz. but again disenabled by those negative words in this Act and the hearing and determining of those offences committed only to the Justices of the Kings Bench Assizes and general Goal delivery But for Informations by a common Informer they were never intended here and the Justices of Assize and Goal delivery cannot hold Plea of such Informations as was resolved by the Judges Mich. 4 Car. 1. Jones 193. And yet this Statute did not wholly abrogate the power of the Justices of Peace Justices of P. may take Indictments for some offences against 23 El. 1 or of any other Justices to whom Authority was given by the Statute of 23 Eliz. in relation to the Offences of Recusancy or of saying or hearing Mass but that they might after this Statute of 29. take Indictments notwithstanding the negative words here For this Statute restrains them only from proceeding to Conviction but not from taking Indictments as was held in Edward Plowdens Case cited in Dr. Fosters Case Co. 11. 63. And now by the Statute of 3 Jac. cap. 4. And hear and determine the offence of not coming to Church Stat. 3 Jac. 4. The power of Justices of Peace to hear and determine the Offence of not coming to Church is again restored to them Vide that Statute Sect. 5. And be it also Enacted by the Authority aforesaid Stat. Sect. 3. At what time the money forfeited for not going to the Church shall be paid That every such Offender in not repairing to Divine Service but forbearing the same contrary to the said Estatute as hath beén heretofore convicted for such Offence and hath not made submission and béen conformable according to the true meaning of the said Statute shall without any other Indictment or Conviction pay into the Receipt of the said Exchequer all such sums of money as according to the Rate of twenty pounds for every month sithence the same
be a Popish Recusant convict at any time after his or her conviction shall exercise any publick Office or Charge in the Commonwealth but shall be utterly disabled to exercise the same by himself or by his Deputy except such Husband himself and his Children which shall be above the age of nine years abiding with him and his Servants in houshold shall once every month at the least not having any reasonable excuse to the contrary repair to some Church or Chappel usual for Divine Service and there hear Divine Service And the said Husband and such his Children and Servants as are of méet age receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper at such times as are limited by the Laws of this Realm and do bring up his said Children in true Religion This Clause extends not to all sorts of Recusants who are convicted or have Wives who are Recusants convicted as is mistaken in the late additions to Dalton cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 46. To whom this clause extends But at this day only to the Popish Recusant convicted or having a Wife who is a Popish Recusant convicted To whom not A Popish Recusant not convicted hath a Wife who is convicted of Recusancy but is no Popish Recusant The Husband is not disabled by this Statute to exercise any publick Office or Charge for that neither the Husband is a convicted Recusant nor the Wife a Popish Recusant A person who is convicted of Recusancy but is no Popish Recusant hath a Wife who is a Popish Recusant but not convicted The Husband is out of this Branch of the Statute for that neither the Husband is a Popish Recusant nor the Wife convicted Stat. Sect. 11. A Married Woman being a Popish Recusant And be it also Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That every Married Woman being or that shall be a Popish Recusant convict her Husband not standing convicted of Popish Recusancy which shall not conform her self and remain conformed but shall forbear to repair to some Church or usual place of Common Prayer and there to hear Divine Service and Sermon if any then be and within the said year receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper according to the Laws of this Realm by the space of one whole year next before the death of her said Husband shall forfeit and loose to the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors the issues and profits of two parts of her Ioynture and two parts of her Dower in thrée parts to be divided during her life of or out of any the Lands Tenements or Hereditaments which are or were her said Husbands and also be disabled to be Executrix or Administratrix of her said Husband and to have or demand any part or portion of her said late Husbands Goods or Chattels by any Law custom or usage whatsoever The issues and profits of two parts of her Ioynture and two parts of her Dower A Woman may have Joynture and Dower both And not of two parts of her Joynture or Dower as Wingate tit Crown numb 134. For there are divers Cases where notwithstanding the Statute of 27 H. 8. cap. 10. the Wife shall have her Dower and Joynture both And forfeit two parts of both And if she offend against this branch she shall forfeit the profits of two parts of both And that not only where the Joynture made to her is not warranted by that Statute but in some Cases where the Joynture is pursuant and according to the Statute she shall have her Dower and Joynture both Of the first sort are these Where the Joynture is not warranted by Stat. 27 H. 8. 10. If an Estate be made of Lands to the Wife for the life of another Co. 4. 3. Vernons Case Or for a thousand years or for a thousand years if she live so long Co. 1. Inst 36. Or if a Rent be granted to the Wife for the life of another or for years or any other way not pursuant to that Statute Vide Anderson 1. 288. c. 296. Bickley's Case Anderson 2. 30 31. c. 20. Wentworths Case Or if an Estate be made to others in fee or for the Wives life upon Trust for her benefit Co. 1. Inst 36. Or if a man Covenant to stand seized to the use of himself in Tail the Remainder to the use of his Wife for life Pasch 16. Jac. B. R. Woods Case Or if the Husband make a Feoffment in see to the use of himself for life the remainder to another for life or years the remainder to the Wife for her life Co. 4. 2. 3. Hutton 51. Sherwells Case In all these Cases although the Lands or Rent were conveyed to the Wife for her Joynture yet the Estate not being within the Statute of 27 H. 8. her acceptance thereof shall not bar her Dower but she shall have such Joynture and her Dower also And the reason why in the two last Cases the Wife shall not be barred of her Dower although there be an Estate limited to her for her life is because the Estate is not in its first Creation appointed to take immediately after the death of the Husband And no matter which arises ex post facto can salve this or make it a Joynture within that Statute to bar her Dower And therefore if in the first of those two Cases the Husband Tenant in Tail dies without issue or if in the last Case he in the remainder die before the Husband or the term for years determines in the Husbands life time so that the Wife may enter presently after his death yet because the Estate to the Wife for her life was not originally limited to take immediately after his death it shall not bar her Dower For quod ab initio non valet in tractu temporis non convalescet Co. 4. 2 3. Hutton 51. And as in all the Cases before mentioned if the Estate were made for her Joynture the Wife shall have such Joynture and her Dower both so if she be an Offender within this branch of the Act and conform not within the year next before her Husbands death she shall forfeit the profits of two parts of both Of what Lands she shall not forfeit the profits But otherwise it is where an Estate is given or limited by the Husband to the Wife and it s neither expressed nor can be averred and proved to be given or limited for her Joynture or in recompence of her Dower And therefore if any of the Estates before mentioned which are not within the Statute of 27 H. 8. be granted or limited to the Wife by the Husband or any other Estate for her life or otherwise which would be a good Joynture within the said Statute if it were intended for a Joynture as if a man before or after Marriage Covenants to stand seized of Lands to the use of himself for life the Remainder to his Wife for her life and it is neither expressed in the Deed nor can be averred and
the person Co. 1. Inst 128. Plea in disability is peremptory The Defendant in Debt upon an Obligation pleads that the Plaintiff is a Popish Recusant Convict who replies nul tiel Record Such Plea in disability of the person is peremptory and nul tiel Record is an Issue and Judgment shall be given against the Defendant upon failer of the Record Hetley 18. But yet if there be a Plea of a Conviction of Recusancy had before Justices of Gaol delivery and the Defendant mistakes and takes out a Certiorari Certiorari to the Justices of Peace this shall not be a failer of the Record Failer of Record although the Defendant hath it not at the day For that the issuing of the Certiorari was the Award of the Court But a Certiorari shall be awarded de novo to the Justices of Gaol delivery before whom the Plaintiff was convicted Hobart 135. Pye against Thrill Note if the Defendant be sued in the Common Pleas or any other of the principal Courts at Westminster and he plead a Conviction of Recusancy before Justices of Gaol delivery or Justices of Peace he need not take his Certiorari Certiorari out of what Court out of the Chancery and so bring it by Mittimus But the Court may send a Certiorari immediately to that inferiour Court where the Plaintiff was convicted as was held in that Case of Pye and Thrill vide 19 H. 6. 19. And the Justices themselves And by whom before whom the Conviction was had must certifie and therefore if the Conviction was before Justices of Peace the Certificate cannot be by the Custos Rotulorum Custos rotulorum alone though he keep the Records for the Certiorari is in such Case directed to the Justices of Peace Hobart 135. A Popish Recusant is convicted of Recusancy in a popular Suit and after such Conviction sues the Informer Qui tam c. Who may take advantage of this disability Informer upon some other matter or cause of Action arising between them Quaere whether the Defendant may plead such Conviction in disability of the Recusant For this Conviction disables the Recusant to sue as if he were excommunicated and no otherwise Now if a Bishop Excommunicate any one and the Bishop Bishop be afterwards sued at Law for any other matter or cause by the person so excommunicated the Bishop cannot plead this Excommunication in disability of the Plaintiff who sues him Co. 1. Inst 134. Swinborne Part 5. Sect. 6. p. 305. And the reason given for this in Trollops Case Co. 8. 68. is because the Bishop was a party to the Excommunication and therefore shall take no advantage by it which reason seems to hold likewise in the Case of an Informer Qui tam c. who is a party to the Conviction of the Recusant upon the popular Suit which Conviction renders the Recusant disabled to all intents as an Excommunicant person And therefore he being a party to it by the same Rule shall not take advantage of it in disability of the Recusant in any Action brought by the Recusant against him But yet notwithstanding I conceive the Informer Qui tam c. at whose Suit the Recusant was convicted may well take advantage of this Conviction and plead it in disability of the person of the Recusant And that the true reason why the Bishop shall not be admitted to plead an Excommunication pronounced by himself in disability of the person Excommunicated is not because he is a party to the Excommunication but because in matters of Excommunication the Bishop acts as a Judge and 't is by his Sentence and Authority that the party is Excommunicated and he shall not take advantage in another Suit of a Sentence given by himself judicially And this will not hold in the Case of an Informer who though he be a party to the Suit in which the Recusant is disabled as an Excommunicate person yet is no Judge in the Case whether the party Sued shall be disabled or no as the Bishop is in the other Case where the party is actually Excommunicated by him And if the Bishop should be barred to Plead and take advantage of such Excommunication because he is a party thereunto it would follow that the person who Sues in the Spiritual Court and at whose instance the person Sued is Excommunicated should be barred likewise to take advantage of such disability in the Plaintiff at Law for he is a party to the Excommunication for that he is a party to the Suit upon which the Excommunication is originally founded But the contrary to this is strongly implied in 14 H. 4. 14. where the Case was A. was Excommunicated in a Suit depending between him and B. and afterwards A. Sues B. upon the Statute of Praemunire who pleads this Excommunication in disability of the Plaintiff Here the Plea was disallowed because the principal Suit on which the Excommunication depended was brought before the Pope But in the debate of the Case there was not the least word of exception to the Plea upon this ground because the Excommunication was at the instance of the Defendant or that the Defendant should not take advantage of the Plaintiffs disability for that he was a party to the Excommunication which disabled him Executor or Administrator disabled If an Executor or Administrator becomes a Popish Recusant convict it seems he is disabled by this Act to Sue in either of those Capacities For the Act saith He shall be disabled to all intents as an Excommunicate person Now a person actually Excommunicated cannot Sue as Executor or Administrator as is held in 21 E. 4. 49. 21 H. 6. 30. 14 H. 6. 15. Co. 1. Inst 134. Although there are some opinions to the contrary Vide Finch 27. Stat. Sect. 13. What Suits a Popish Recusant may prosecute Provided nevertheless That it shall and may be lawful for any such person so disabled for and notwithstanding any thing in this Law contained to sue or prosecute an Action or Suit for or concerning only such of his or her Lands Tenements Leases Rents Annuities and Hereditaments or for the Issues and Profits thereof which are not to be seized or taken into the Kings hands his Heirs or Successors by force of any Law for or concerning his or her Recusancy or any part thereof Which are not to be seized or taken into the Kings hands c. These words are not restrained to such Lands Lands seized into the Kings hands c. as cannot be seized into the Kings hands for Recusancy For then the Recusant could in no case Sue for more then the third part for that the King may if he please make his Election and seize the other two parts in lieu of the Twenty pounds per month But they are intended of all Lands c. of the Recusant which neither the King hath seized nor are by Law to be seized by vertue of any thing
which the King hath already done or in respect of what the Recusant after his conviction hath omitted to do And therefore if a man be convicted of recusancy upon a popular Suit or an Action of Debt at the Kings Suit alone in which Cases the penalty of Twenty pounds per month is not appropriated to the King for the time to come and he pays the penalty recovered or if he be Convicted upon Indictment and after such Conviction duly pays the Twenty pounds per month into the Exchequer and the King makes no Election to take the two third parts of his Estate in lieu thereof such Recusant may by this Proviso in either of those Cases Sue or Prosecute for any of his Lands Tenements Leases Rents Annuities or Hereditaments whatsoever notwithstanding his Conviction For when the penalty recovered is satisfied or the forfeiture appropriated to the King is duly paid into the Exchequer his Lands c. are not to be seized by force of any Law for Recusancy unless the King make his Election to have the two parts And until that Election they cannot in the sense of this Proviso be said to be Lands to be seized or taken into the Kings hands for that the King cannot have the two parts and the Twenty pounds per month both But if the King make no such Election and the Twenty pounds per month be duly paid into the Exchequer the Recusant is to hold and enjoy all his Lands Tenements c. as if he had never been convicted And during that time there can be no distinction made between the two parts and the Recusant's third part so that in this Case the Recusant must either be enabled to Sue and Prosecute for all his Lands c. or none and to think the latter of these were to render this Proviso nugatory and vain But when once the King hath seized the two thirds for recusancy either by way of Election or for nonpayment of the penalty then the Recusant is enabled to Sue only for the other third part whether in the hands of the King or of a common person Stat. Sect. 14. And for that Popish Recusants are not usually Married nor their Children Christned nor themselves Buried according to the Law of the Church of England but the same are done superstitiously by Popish Persons in secret whereby the days of their Marriages Births and Burials cannot be certainly known Stat. Sect. 15. Marriages of Popish Recusants Be it further Enacted by Authority of this present Parliament That every man being or which shall be a Popish Recusant convicted and who shall be hereafter Married otherwise then in some open Church or Chappel and otherwise then according to the Orders of the Church of England by a Minister lawfully Authorized shall be utterly disabled and excluded to have any Estate of Fréehold into any the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments of his Wife as Tenant by the Courtesie of England And that every Woman being or which shall be a Popish Recusant convicted and who shall be hereafter Married in other form then as aforesaid shall be utterly excluded and disabled not only to claim any Dower of the Inheritance of her Husband whereof she may be endowable or any Iointure of the Lands and Hereditaments of her Husband or any of his Ancestors but also of her Widows Estate and Frank-bank in any Customary Lands whereof her Husband died seized and likewise be disabled and excluded to have or enjoy any part or portion of the goods of her said Husband by vertue of any custom of any County City or Place where the same shall lie or be And if any such man shall be Married with any Woman contrary to the intent and true meaning of this Act which Woman hath or shall have no Lands Tenements or Hereditaments whereof he may be intituled to be Tenant by the Curtesie Then such man so Marrying as aforesaid shall forfeit and lose One hundred pounds the one half thereof to be to the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors and the other moiety to such person or persons as shall Sue for the same by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information in any of the Kings Majesties Courts of Record wherein no Essoin Protection or Wager of Law shall be admitted or allowed Where the Husband is no offender Every man being or which shall be a Popish Recusant Convicted A Man who is no Popish Recusant Convicted marries a Woman who is a Popish Recusant Convicted in other form then is here appointed He shall not forfeit any thing or be disabled by this Act. By a Minister lawfully Authorized Minister lawfully Authorized In an Information upon this Statute for being married otherwise then is here appointed it is sufficient for the Defendant to say that he was married c. by a Minister lawfully Authorized without shewing in particular how or where or when but if a Traverse come of the other side then the Defendant is in his Rejoynder to shew the time and place Vide Bulstrode 2. 50. 52. Creswich against Rookesby Every Woman being or which shall be a Popish Recusant Convicted A Woman who is no Popish Recusant Convicted Where the Wife is no offender marries a Man who is a Popish Recusant Convicted in other form than is here appointed she shall not be disabled by this Branch of the Act For the forfeiture or disability extends only to the Popish Recusant Convicted and as in the Case before recited the Woman only shall be disabled so in this Case the Man only shall forfeit or be disabled Or any Ioynture of the Lands and Hereditaments of her Husband or any of his Ancestors Joynture A Feme who is a Popish Recusant Convicted and married otherwise then is appointed by this Act is not therefore disabled to have any sort of Joynture as Wingate tit Crowne n. 136. mistakes but only such Joynture as is of the Lands or Hereditaments of her Husband or some of his Ancestors and therefore if in consideration of some service done or for some other consideration and for the advancement of A. in marriage Lands are setled upon his intended Wife for her Joynture by some person besides A. who is not any of the Ancestors of A. such Joynture is not within this Act nor shall the Wife although a Popish Recusant Convicted and married otherwise c. be disabled by any strained construction of this Law to enjoy the Lands after her Husbands death For a penal Law shall be taken strictly and not by equity or intendment especially where the intent of the Lawmakers doth not appear to the contrary and the Case such as doth but rarely happen And 't is a good Rule in the construction of Statute Laws which the late Lord Chief Justice Vaughan hath laid down in his Argument of Bole and Hortons Case Mich. 25. Car. 2. viz. when the words of a Law extend not to an inconvenience rarely happening and do to those which often
hurt or prejudice the Péerage of any Péer of this Realm or to take away any Right Power Priviledge or Profit which any person being a Péer of this Realm hath or ought to enjoy by reason of his Péerage either in time of Parliament or otherwise or to take away creation-money or Bills of Impost nor to take away or make void any Pension or Salary granted by His Majesty to any person for valuable and sufficient Consideration for Life Lives or Years other then such as relate to any Office or to any Place of Trust under His Majesty and other then Pensions of bounty or voluntary Pensions nor to take away or make void any Estate of Inheritance granted by His Majesty or any His Predecessors to any person or persons of or in any Lands Rents Tithes or Hereditaments not being Offices nor to take away or make void any Pension or Salary already granted by His Majesty to any person who was Instrumental in the happy preservation of His Sacred Majesty after the Battel at Worcester in the year One thousand six hundred fifty one until His Majesties arrival beyond the Seas nor to take away or make void the Grant of any Office or Offices of Inheritance or any Fée Salary or Reward for executing such Office or Offices or thereto any way belonging granted by His Majesty or any his Predecessors to or enjoyed or which hereafter shall be enjoyed by any person or persons who shall refuse or neglect to take the said Oaths or either of them or to receive the Sacrament or to subscribe the Declaration mentioned in this Act in manner therein expressed Nevertheless so as such person or persons having or enjoying any such Office or Offices of Inheritance do or shall substitute and appoint his or their sufficient Deputy or Deputies which such Officer or Officers respectively are hereby impowred from time to time to make or change any former Law or Vsage to the contrary notwithstanding to exercise the said Office or Offices until such time as the person or persons having such Office or Offices shall voluntarily in the Court of Chancery before the Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper for the time being or in the Court of Kings Bench take the said Oaths and receive the Sacrament according to Law and subscribe the said Declaration and so as all and every the Deputy and Deputies so as aforesaid to be appointed take the said Oaths receive the Sacrament and subscribe the said Declaration from time to time as they shall happen to be so appointed in manner as by this Act such Officers whose Deputies they be are appointed to do and so as such Deputies be from time to time approved of by the Kings Majesty under His Privy Signer But that all and every the Péers of this Realm shall have hold and enjoy what is provided for as aforesaid and all and every other person or persons before mentioned denoted or intended within this Proviso shall have hold and enjoy what is provided for as aforesaid notwithstanding any incapacity or disability mentioned in this Act. Provided also That the said Péers and every of them may take the said Oaths and make the said Subscription and deliver the said Certificates before the Péers sitting in Parliament if the Parliament be sitting within the time limited for doing thereof and in the intervals of Parliament in the High Court of Chancery in which respective Courts all the said proceédings are to be recorded in manner aforesaid Provided always That no married Woman or person under the age of Eightéen years or being beyond or upon the Seas or found by the lawful Oaths of Twelve men to be non compos mentis and so being and remaining at the end of Trinity Term in the year of our Lord One thousand six hundred seventy thrée having any Office shall by vertue of this Act loose or forfeit any such his or her Office other then such married Woman during the life of her Husband only for any neglect or refusal of taking the Oaths and doing the other things required by this Act to be done by persons having Offices so as such respective persons within Four months after the death of the Husband coming to the age of Eighteen years returning into this Kingdom and becoming of sound mind shall respectively take the said Oaths and perform all other things in manner as by this Act is appointed for persons to do who shall happen to have any Office or Offices to them given or fallen after the end of the said Trinity Term. Provided also That any person who by his or her neglect or refusal according to this Act shall lose or forfeit any Office may be capable by a new Grant of the said Office or of any other and to have and hold the same again such person taking the said Oaths and doing all other things required by this Act so as such Office be not granted to and actually enjoyed by some other person at the time of the regranting thereof Provided also That nothing in this Act contained shall extend to make any Forfeiture Disability or Incapacity in by or upon any non-Commission-Officer or Officers in His Majesties Navy if such Officer or Officers shall only subscribe the Declaration therein required in manner as the same is direted Provided also That nothing in this Act contained shall extend to prejudice George Earl of Bristol or Anne Countess of Bristol his Wife in the Pension or Pensions granted to them by Patent under the Great Seal of England hearing date the Sixtéenth day of July in the year of our Lord One thousand six hundred sixty and nine being in lieu of a just Debt due to the said Earl from His Majesty particularly expressed in the said Patent Provided also That this Act or any thing therein contained shall not extend to the Office of any High Constable Petty Constable Tithingman Headborough Overseer of the Poor Church-wardens Surveyor of the High-ways or any like inferior Civil Office or to any Office of Forester or Kéeper of any Park Chace Warren or Game or of Bailiff of any Manor or Lands or to any like private Offices or to any person or persons having only any the before mentioned or any the like Offices FINIS THE TABLE Abjuration See Baron Feme IN what cases the offender against 35 Eliz. 1. of Conventicles and the Popish Recusant confined by 35 Eliz. 2. are to abjure the Realm and in what cases not 115. 116. 123. 134 135 136 137 138. 143. Who may require such Abjuration 116. 135. Before whom it must be made 116. 135. Refusing to abjure or staying or returning without licence is Felony 116 117. 139 140. What he who abjures or refuses to abjure forfeits 124. The form of the Oath of Abjuration 138 139. He that abjures yet oweth to the King his ligeance 139. Absolution What Absolution is not within 13 Eliz. 2.50 Where absolving of the Kings Subjects or being absolved is High Treason 57 58. 184
it directly by express words yet they both conceived they were within the intent of the Act by reason as Manwood said of these words all other the Lands c. liable to such seizure or to the penalties aforesaid But it was granted on all hands that by these general words here the King hath not any estate given him in the Recusants Copyhold Lands but only a right or title to two thirds of the profits By the Kings receiving of which the Lord cannot be impeached of his Customs and Services as he would be if the King should seize the Land it self And a difference was there taken between an Act of Parliament which transfers an Estate to the King and an Act of Parliament which gives him only the profits of the Estate For in the first Case the Rule in Heydons Case that Copyhold Lands shall not pass by general words shall stand good for the prejudice that may otherwise accrew to the Lord But where the Lords Seigniory Customs and Services are not to be Impeached or taken away as here they will not by the Kings bare receiving of the profits there it was said Copyholds shall be included within the general words of Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Leonard 1. 97. C. 126. And yet Vide Owen 37. where this Case is otherwise reported and that it was at length after great debate adjudged that Copyhold Lands are not within this Statute nor are seizable for the Kings two parts And according to this Judgment I take the modern practice of the Exchequer to have been that neither the Land it self nor the profits of Copyhold Lands are liable to such seizure And for the more spéedy conviction of such Offender Stat. Sect. 5. The Indictment sufficient though it be not mentioned that the party is within the Realm in not repairing to Divine Service but forbearing the same contrary to the said Estatute Be it Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That the Indictment of every such Offender mentioning the not coming of such Offender to the Church of the Parish where such person at any time before such Indictment was or did keép House or Residence nor to any other Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer shall be sufficient in the Law And that it shall not be neédful to mention in any such Indictment that the party Offender was or is inhabiting within this Realm of England or any other the Queens Majestis Dominions But if it shall happen any such Offender then not to be within this Realm or other her Majesties Dominions that in such case the party shall be relieved by Plea to be put in in that behalf and not otherwise And that upon the Indictment of such Offender Stat. Sect. 6. A Proclamation that the party Indicted shall render his Body to the Sheriff a Proclamation shall be made at the same Assizes or Goal delivery in which the Indictment shall be taken if the same be taken at any Assize or Goal delivery by which it shall be commanded that the body of such Offender shall de rendred to the Sheriff of the same County before the said next Assizes or general Goal delivery to be holden in the same County And if at the said next Assizes or Goal delivery the same Offender so proclaimed shall not make appearance of Record that then upon such default Recorded the same shall be as sufficient a conviction in Law of the said Offence whereof the party so standeth Indicted as is aforesaid as if upon the same Indictment a Trial by Verdict thereupon had proceeded and been recorded If the same be taken at any Assize or Goal delivery For if the Indictment had been taken before Justices of Peace Proclamation by whom to be made no Proclamation thereupon could have been made upon this Statute by the Justices of Assize or Goal delivery as was resolved in the Case of Edward Plowden And therefore upon such an Indictment for Recusancy taken before Justices of Peace the Court was to remove the Indictment into the Kings-Bench And there process might have been made out against the Recusant and he convicted For the Justices of Peace could do no more then Indict all other proceedings being taken away from them by this Statute Co. 11. 63. Dr. Fosters Case Rolles 1. 94. C. 41. the same Case But now by the Statute of 3 Jac. cap. 4. the Law is altered in this point Stat. 3 Jac. 4. and the Justices of Peace upon Indictments taken before them may proceed to proclaim and convict the Recusant as well as Justices of Assize and Goal delivery Shall be rendred to the Sheriff Vide Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 5. Before the said next Assizes or general Gaol delivery Vide Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 5. Appearance Make appearance of Record What appearance will serve in this Case Vide Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 5. Vpon such default That is upon his default of appearance of Record at the next Assizes or Goal delivery For if he makes such appearance Default saved that shall save his default of not rendring his Body to the Sheriff and the not rendring himself to the Sheriff shall be no conviction as Wingate would make it to be Tit. Crowne numb 66. As sufficient a Conviction in Law That is as if he were convicted by Verdict Conviction upon Proclamation no Judgment but not as sufficient as if a Judgment were had against the Recusant For although by force of this and other Statutes the conviction upon Proclamation and default of appearance make the Recusant liable to divers penalties and incapacities and is in those respects as forceable as a Judgment yet it shall not in other Cases have the force or effect of a Judgment And therefore it was resolved 37 38 Eliz. in the Case of the general pardon Anno 35 Eliz. where there is an exception of all penalties and forfeitures due to the Queen and converted to a debt by Judgment that notwithstanding that exception a Recusant convicted upon Proclamation was within the pardon and the forfeitures due upon such conviction were thereby pardoned For the debt was not due to the Queen by Judgment but upon conviction only But otherwise it had been if he had been convicted according to the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 without Proclamation and Judgment had been given thereupon Vide Co. 11. 65. Dr. Fosters Case Stat. Sect. 7. Provided always That whensoever any such Offender as is aforesaid shall make submission and become conformable according to the form limited by the same Estatute made in the thrée and twentieth year of the Quéens Majesties Reign The Offender submitting or dying no forfeiture shall ensue or be continued or shall fortune to die that then no forfeiture of twenty pounds for any month or seizure of the Lands of the same Offender from and after such Submission and Conformity or Death and full satisfaction of all
enlarged of such Imprisonment or Restraint and shall be able to Travel repair to their place of dwelling where they usually heretofore made their common abode and shall not at any time after pass or remove above five miles from thence Stat. Sect. 2. Or to be convicted shall repair to his usual dwelling and not remove above five miles And also That every person being above the age of sixtéen years born within any her Majesties Realms or Dominions or made Denizen and having or which hereafter shall have any certain place of dwelling and abode within this Realm which being then a Popish Recusant shall at any time hereafter be lawfully convicted for not repairing to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer to hear Divine Service there but forbearing the same contrary to the said Laws and Statutes and being within this Realm at the time that they shall be convicted shall within forty days next after the same Conviction if they be not restrained or stayed by Imprisonment or otherwise as is aforesaid and in such Cases of restraint and stay then within twenty days next after they shall be enlarged of such Imprisonment or Restraint and shall be able to Travel repair to their place of usual dwelling and abode and shall not at any time after pass or remove above five miles from thence The punishment of an Offender upon pain that every person and persons that shall offend against the tenor and intent of this Act in any thing before mentioned shall lose and forfeit all his and their Goods and Chattels and shall also lose and forfeit to the Quéens Majesty all the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments and all the Rents and Annuities of every such person so doing or offending during the Life of the same Offender What Popish Recusants are not within this Act Born within any her Majesties Realms or Dominions or made Denizen So that all Popish Recusants are not within this Branch as Wingate tit Crown n. 78. mistakes For it extends not to an Alien who is born out of the Kings Leigeance unless he be made Denizen And which are In the late Additions to Dalton cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 14. this Clause is restrained to such as are born in England but it is clear that it extends to all the Kings natural Subjects if they live in England although they were born in Ireland or any other of the late Queens Dominions besides England Denizen who By Denizen is here to be understood an Alien who owes to the King an acquired Subjection or Allegiance whether he be made Denizen by the Kings Letters Patents or be naturalized by Act of Parliament For Naturalization includes all the priviledges of a Denizen and something more and every one who is naturalized is thereby made a Denizen although he that is made a Denizen by the Kings Letters Patents is not thereby naturalized Which being then a Popish Recusant This is the first penal Statute which was made against Popish Recusants by that name and as distinguished from other Recusants In the late Additions to Dalton cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 7. What is Recusancy it 's said That the matter of Recusancy stands in two particulars First absenting from the Church Secondly refusing the Oaths prescribed by 1 Eliz. 1. and 3 Jac. 4. Stat. 1 Eliz 1. 3 Jac. 4. But this description of Recusancy is either too narrow or too large For if the word Recusancy be taken in a large sense then the refusing to receive the Sacrament contrary to the Statute of 3 Jac. 4. by him that conforms and comes to Church may be as fitly called a point of Recusancy as the refusing the Oaths of Supremacy or Allegiance But if Recusancy be taken in a strict and proper sense then it extends only to the point of not coming to Church and not to refusing the Oaths of Supremacy or Allegiance And in this last sense are all the Statutes to be understood which inflict any penalty or disability upon a Recusant or a Popish Recusant unless where the not receiving of the Sacrament is particularly mentioned And this appears by the explanation which the Statutes make every where of Conformity the opposite to Recusancy viz. repairing to Church What is Conformity and more particularly the said Statute of 3 Jac. 4. which saith That the Popish Recusant convicted which conforms himself and repairs to the Church shall receive the Sacrament which words and repairs to the Church are explanatory of the former viz. which conforms himself so that this Conformity is not intended of taking the Oaths of Supremacy or Allegiance but consists only in repairing to Church and consequently Recusancy its opposite properly so called consists in absenting from Church And this appears further by that Branch of the said Statute of 3 Jac. cap. 4. which relates to the Oath of Allegiance where 't is said That the Oath shall be required of him who confesseth or denieth not himself to be a Recusant or that he hath not received the Sacrament where Recusant cannot be understood in any other sense then of him who forbears to come to Church An Information or Indictment against a Popish Recusant Information or Indictment against a Popish Recusant for Recusancy is of the same form with that against any other Recusant viz. That he came not to his Parish Church or any other Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer but forbore the same by the space of c. Vide Co. lib. intr 569. Co. 11. 56. Dr. Fosters Case so that upon his Conviction for Recusancy it doth not appear of Record whether the Offender be a Popish or other Recusant And therefore where this or any of the subsequent Statutes commands or prohibits a Popish Recusant convict to do a thing and a person convicted of Recusancy who is a Popish Recusant be Indicted thereupon his Conviction must be set forth in the Indictment with this or the like confusion Per quod praedict A.B. devenit Papalis Recusans convictus so it is if a Popish Recusant Convict be incapacitated to take or to give or dispose of any thing and another person be substituted by the Statute in his stead as in the Case of a Presentation by force of the Statute of 3 Jac. cap. 5. Stat. 3 Jac. 5. in a Quare Impedit Quare Impedit brought by the Chancellor and Schollars of the University His Conviction must be be set forth with an averment that he is Papalis Recusans Vide Co. 10. 54. And if a Popish Recusant whether convicted or not convicted be so commanded prohibited or incapacitated in an Indictment or Information upon the Statute it must be averred that he is Papalis Recusans A person who hath a certain place of abode is convicted for not coming to Church What Popish Recusants are not within this Act. and afterwards becomes a Papist being none before It seems that he is not restrained
by this Act within the compass of five miles because he was not a Popish Recusant at the time of his Conviction For the Adverb then cannot have relation to the foregoing words viz. having any certain place of dwelling and abode within this Realm For then the sense would be That if he be a Popish Recusant at any time when he hath a certain place of dwelling and abode within this Realm and he were formerly convicted for not coming to Church he shall repair to his dwelling within forty days after his Conviction which may be a meer impossibility For perhaps the forty days after his Conviction expired before he became a Popish Recusant and therefore the word then must of necessity relate to the subsequent words touching his Conviction And being then a Popish Recusant is as much as to say being a Popish Recusant at the time of his Conviction so that if he be convicted as a Recusant yet if he be not then a Popish Recusant he is not restrained by this Act if he be within this branch of the Statute viz. one who hath a certain place of dwelling and abode within this Realm Above five miles When an Act of Parliament speaks of miles Miles they are not to be taken as a Bird or Arrow may fly but according to the nearest and most usual way Cro. Hill 33 Eliz. 212. Minge versus Earle The Miles here I take to be intended of English miles An English mile contains eight Furlongs each Furlong forty Perches or Poles and every Perch or Pole sixteen foot and a half Co. 4. Inst 274. Dalton V. cap. 65. tit Weights and Measures and so much was a mile explained to be by the Statute of 35 Eliz. cap. 6. Stat. 35 Eliz. 6. by the same Parliament which made this Act against Popish Recusants Rastall London 252. where 't is said eight Furlongs to a mile and not five Furlongs as 't is mistaken in Poulton And yet in that Case of Minge and Earle the Defendant in maintenance that locus in quo c. was four miles from Rye according to the Statute of 23 Eliz. cap. 5. of Woods pleaded 23 Eliz. 5. that it was four thousand paces from Rye reckoning five Foot to every Pace where is meant the Italian mile viz. 5000 Foot and not the English which is 5280 Foot and no exception was taken to it by the Plaintiff or the Court. Vide Dalton V. supra And be it also Enacted by the Authority aforesaid Stat. Sect. 4. What a Popish Recusant shall do having no place of abode That every person above the age of sixteén years born within any her Majesties Realms or Dominions not having any certain place of dwelling and abode within this Realm and being a Popish Recusant not usually repairing to some Church Chappel or usual place of Common Prayer but forbearing the same contrary to the same Laws and Statutes in that behalf made shall within forty days next after the end of this Session of Parliament if they be then within this Realm and not imprisoned restrained or stayed as aforesaid and in such case of absence out of the Realm imprisonment restraint or stay then within twenty days next after they shall return into the Realm and be enlarged of such imprisonment or restraint and shall be able to Travel repair to the place where such person was born or where the Father or Mother of such person shall then be dwelling and shall not at any time after remove or pass above five miles from thence The punishment of the Offender upon pain that every person and persons which shall offend against the tenor and intent of this Act in any thing before-mentioned shall lose and forfeit all his and their Goods and Chattels and shall also forfeit to the Quéens Majesty all the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments and all the Rents and Annuities of every such person so doing or offending during the life of the same person By comparing together this and the precedent Clause A Popish Recusant not convicted may be within this Act it will appear plainly that the Statute puts a great difference between the Popish Recusant who hath a certain place of abode in this Realm and him that hath none For to restrain a Popish Recusant who hath a certain place of abode within this Realm from travelling above five miles there are three Qualifications required by the Act. 1. That he be convicted of Recusancy 2. That he be a Popish Recusant at the time of his Conviction 3. That at the time of such Conviction he be within this Realm And if either of these fail he is not restrained by this Act. But if a Popish Recusant have no certain place of abode within this Realm but is ubiquitary there no such Qualifications are required but if he be a Papist and doth not usually repair to Church but forbears so to do he ought to repair to the place where he was born or where his Father or Mother dwelt and not to remove above five miles from thence and that whether he be convicted or not For the Statute when it comes to speak of him who hath no certain place of abode leaves out all the aforesaid Qualifications required in him who hath a certain place of abode and it clearly distinguishes between him who is convicted for not repairing to some Church c. which is required in those whose abode is certain and him who doth not usually repair to some Church c. which in those whose abode is uncertain is sufficient to bring them within the danger and penalty of this Law if they repair not to the place appointed them by the Act or remove above five miles from thence And 't is observable that in this Clause which speaks of the Popish Recusant who hath no certain place of abode there is no mention made of Forty days to be allowed him after his Conviction to repair to the place appointed him the reason whereof is because it takes in the whole kind of such Popish Recusants as well the not convicted as the convicted and makes no distinction between them if they have no certain place of abode Et ubi lex non distinguit nec nos distinguere debemus Nor was it without great reason that ubiquitary Popish Recusants should be confined whether they were convicted or not convicted As for the other who have a certain place of abode it is to be presumed that the most considerable of them would be prosecuted and convicted for their Recusancy in the respective places where they dwell and de mini mis non curat lex may in this Case be applied to persons as well as in other Cases to things But as for him who is fixed to no certain place as he is the more dangerous of the two so the more unlikely to be prosecuted to a Conviction being here one day and gone the next and therefore the less taken notice of And had the Statute
taken in only such as are convicted it would have been eluded and rendred ineffectual for want of a Conviction of the greater part of such ubiquitary Recusants The want of due consideration of this Statute in each of these parts of it hath occasioned some mistakes in those who have handled it And Wingate tit Crown numb 78. restrains both parts of it as well relating to those that have no certain place of abode as those whose place of abode is certain to Recusants convicted and makes no mention that this later sort must be in England at the time of their Conviction And in the late Additions to Dalton cap. 81. tit Recusants Sect. 14. 't is not only said that both sorts must be convicted but that they must be in England at the time of their Conviction which two things are only requisite in such who have a certain place of abode and not in the other sort who are within the meaning and danger of this Law without any precedent Conviction for Recusancy See more of this matter Licence to Travel Stat. 3 Jac. 5. and how a Popish Recusant shall be licensed to Travel out of his compass of five miles Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 5. Sect. 8. And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid Stat. Sect. 4. A Popish Recusant Copy-holder That every such Offender as is before mentioned which hath or shall have any Lands Tenements or Hereditaments by Copy of Court Roll or by any other customary tenure at the will of the Lord according to the Custom of any Mannor shall forfeit all and singular his and their said Lands Tenements and Hereditaments so holden by Copy of Court Roll or customary tenure as aforesaid for and during the life of such offender if his or her Estate so long continue to the Lord or Lords of whom the same be immediately holden if the same Lord or Lord or Lords be not then a Popish Recusant and convicted for not coming to Church to hear Divine Service but forbearing the same contrary to the Laws and Statutes aforesaid nor seized or possessed upon Trust to the use or behoof of any such Recusant as aforesaid And in such Case the same forfeiture to be to the Quéens Majesty Provided always Stat. Sect. 5. Popish Recusants shall notifie their coming and deliver in their names and be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That all such persons as by the intent and true meaning of this Act are to make their repair to their place of dwelling and abode or to the place where they were born or where their Father or Mother shall be dwelling and not to remove or pass above five miles from thence as is aforesaid shall within twenty days next after their coming to any of the said places as the Case shall happen notifie their coming thither and present themselves and deliver their true names in writing to the Minister or Curate of the same Parish and to the Constable Headborough or Tithingman of the Town and thereupon the said Minister or Curate shall presently enter the same into a Book to be kept in every Parish for that purpose Which shall be certified to the Sessâ—ons and enrolled there And afterwards the said Minister or Curate and the said Constable Headborough or Tithingman shall certifie the same in writing to the Iustices of the Peace of the same County at the next general or Quarter Sessions to be holden in the same County and the said Iustices shall cause the same to be entred by the Clerk of the Peace in the Rolls of the same Sessions Goods and Lands where not forfeited A Popish Recusant repairs to the place appointed him by this Act and keeps within his compass of five miles but doth not present himself or deliver in his name he doth not forfeit his Goods or Lands For there is no particular penalty inflicted in this part of the Act for that omission nor yet in the subsequent Branch for him that hath clearly twenty marks per annum in Freehold or Goods and Chattels worth forty pounds But yet such person may be Indicted for such neglect and fined upon the general words of the Statute which commands the thing to be done For where an Act of Parliament commands any thing to be done and inflicts no penalty an Indictment lies against the person who ought to do it for his neglect or omission Co. 2. Inst. 55. 163. Vide Cro. Hill 41 Eliz. 655. Crouthers Case Stat. Sect. 6. The penalty of a Popish Recusant of small ability offending against this Act. And to the end that the Realm be not pestered and overcharged with the multitude of such Seditious and dangerous people as is aforesaid who having little or no ability to answer or satisfie any competent penalty for their contempt and disobedience of the said Laws and Statutes and being committed to Prison for the same do live for the most part in better Case there then they could if they were abroad at their own liberty The Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament Assembled do most humbly and instantly beséech the Quéens Majesty that it may be further Enacted That if any such person or persons being a Popish Recusant not being a Feme Covert and not having Lands Tenements Rents or Annuities of an absolute Estate of Inheritance or freehold of the clear yearly value of twenty marks above all charges to their own use and behoof and not upon any secret trust or confidence for any other or Goods and Chattels in their own right and to their own proper use and behoof And not upon any such secret trust and confidence for any other above the value of forty pounds shall not within the time before in this Act in that behalf limited and appointed repair to their place of usual dwelling and aboad if they have any or else to the place where they were born or where their Father or Mother shall be dwelling according to the tenor and intent of this present Act And thereupon notifie their coming and present themselves and deliver their true Names in writing to the Minister or Curate of the Parish and to the Constable Headborough or Tithingman of the Town within such time and in such manner and form as is aforesaid or at any time after such their repairing to any such place as is before appointed shall pass or remove above five miles from the same And shall not within three months next after such person shall be apprehended or taken for offending as is aforesaid conform themselves to the obedience of the Laws and Statutes of this Realm in coming usually to the Church to hear Divine Service and in making such publick Confession and Submission as hereafter in this Act is appointed and expressed being thereunto required by the Bishop of the Diocess or any Iustice of the Peace of the County where the same person shall happen to be or by the Minister or
meét to be Executors or Administrators to any person or persons whatsoever nor to have the Education of their own Children much less of the Children of any other of the Kings Subjects nor to have the marriage of them Be it therefore Enacted by the Authority aforesaid A Recusant shall not be Executor or Administrator That such Recusants convicted or which shall be convicted at the time of the death of any Testator or at the time of the granting of any Administration shall be disabled to be Executor or Administrator by force of any Testament hereafter to be made or Letters of Administration hereafter to be granted Or Guardian nor shall have the custody of any Child as Guardian in Chivalry Guardian in Socage or Guardian in nurture of any Lands Tenements or Hereditaments being Fréehold or Copyhold but shall be adjudged disabled to have any such Wardship or Custody of any such Child or of their Lands Tenements or Hereditaments being Fréehold or Copyhold as aforesaid Who shall have the Wardship And that for the better Education and Preservation of the said Children and of their Estates the next of the kin to such Child or Children to whom the said Lands Tenements or Hereditaments of such Child or Children cannot lawfully descend who shall usually resort to some Church or Chappel and there hear Divine Service and receive the holy Sacrament of the Lords Supper thrice in the year next before according to the Laws of this Realm shall have the Custody and Education of the same Child and of his said Lands and Tenements being holden in Knights Service until the full age of the said Ward of one and twenty years And of his said Lands Tenements and Hereditaments being holden in Socage as a Guardian in Socage And of the said Lands Tenements and Hereditaments holden by Copy of Court Roll of any Mannor so long as the Custom of the said Mannor shall permit and allow the same and in every of the said Cases shall yield an Accompt of the profits thereof to the said Ward as the Case shall require And that if at any time hereafter any of the Wards of the Kings Majesty or of any other shall be granted or sold to any Popish Recusant Convict such Grant or Sale shall be utterly void and of none effect Convicted at the time of the death of any Testator or at the time of the granting of any Administration Granting of Administration These words are to be construed reddendo singula singulis viz. That the Recusant shall be disabled to be Executor if he be convicted at the time of the death of the Testator or to be Administrator if he be Convicted at the time of the granting of Letters of Administration For so these words at the time of the granting of any Administration are here to be understood And therefore if a man makes his Will and therein appoints a Recusant Convict to be his Executor Executor where not disabled and before the Testators death the Conviction is removed by Reversal of the Judgment or avoided or discharged for some defect in the Indictment Proclamation or other proceedings and then the Testator dies In such Case the Recusant is not by this Act disabled to be Executor For although the naming of an Executor is in Law a granting of Administration And if a man by his last Will grants the Administration of his Goods and Chattels to J. S. without more saying thereby J. S. is made his Executor Dyer 290. So that the naming of an Executor and the granting of Administration seem to be the same thing yet this is not a granting of Administration within the meaning of this Act Administration here relating only to an Administrator and not to an Executor besides the naming of an Executor amounts not to a compleat grant of Administration until the Testators death For then and not before the Will becomes in force And if the party stands not then convicted he is not disabled Much less shall he be disabled to be Executor who is not convicted at the time of the Testators death although he be convicted at the time of the Probate of the Will For if these words granting of Administration should relate to an Executor as well as to an Administrator which in truth they do not yet the power given to the Executor by the Ordinary or Ecclesiastical Judge upon the probate of the Will cannot be called a granting but only a committing of Administration Committing of Administration What the Ordinary grants to an Executor according to the Will of the deceased And in such Case all that the Ordinary or Ecclesiastical Judge can grant are Letters testifying what the Testator hath already given to the Executor and a Power or Authority to execute the Will As Guardian in Chivalry Although the Recusant seized in Chivalry and Convicted could not have been Guardian yet if he had granted the Seigniory Seigniory granted over to one who was no Recusant the Grantee should have been Guardian notwithstanding this Act for the mischief here intended to be prevented was removed when the Seigniory was granted to another who was no Recusant By Jones Justice C. B. Hill 20. Jac. Jones 19. So if the King had seized Seized by the King the Recusants Seigniory as part of his two parts the King should have had the Wardship and not the next of kin for the same reason Jones 21. Stat. Sect. 22. Popish Books And be it further Enacted by the Authority of this present Parliament That no person or persons shall bring from beyond the Seas nor shall Print sell or buy any Popish Primmers Ladies Psalters Manuels Rosaries Popish Catechisms Missals Breviaries Portalls Legends and Lives of Saints containing superstitious matter Printed or Written in any Language whatsoever nor any other superstitious Books Printed or Written in the English Tongue upon pain of forfeiture of Forty shillings for every such Book one third part thereof to be to the Kings Majesty his Heirs and Successors one other third part to him that will sue for the same and the other third part to the Poor of the Parish where such Book or Books shall be found to be recovered by Action of Debt Bill Plaint or Information in any of the Kings Majesties Courts of Record wherein no Essoin Protection or Wager of Law shall be admitted or allowed and the said Books to be burned Stat. Sect. 23. Popish Reliques and Books And that it shall be lawfull for any two Iustices of Peace within the Limits of their Iurisdiction or Authority and to all Mayors Bailiffs and Chief Officers of Cities and Towns Corporate in their Liberties from time to time to search the Houses and Lodgings of every Popish Recusant Convict or of every person whose Wife is or shall be a Popish Recusant Convict for Popish Books and Reliques of Popery And that if any Altar Pix Beads Pictures or such like Popish Reliques or any Popish Book
penalty of Twenty pounds per month to the King for the time to come by the said Statute of 29 Eliz. 6. and 3 Jac. 4. Stat. 29 Eliz. 6 3 Jac. 4. that the King cannot bring an Action of Debt or the Informer any popular Suit against the Husband and Wife for any offence of Recusancy committed by the Wife after such Conviction see for this Stat. 23 Eliz. cap. 1. 23 Eliz. 1 Sect. 9. and 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 6. However admitting they may yet now if the King take advantage of this Statute and the Wife be either Imprisoned or the Husband yields the third part of his Lands to the King there is no question but the King and Informer are both barred The King and Informer barred to sue for the Twenty pounds per month for any time incurred after her Conviction For the King hath made his Election to punish her this way and the Informer cannot sue her for she is punished already at the Suit of the King And if the Husband pay the Ten pounds per month the King and Informer are likewise barred for those months of her absence from Church incurred after her Conviction for which the Husband hath paid the Ten pounds monthly to the King for he shall not be twice punished for the same offence Of all his Lands and Tenements By Tenements Tenements what are to be understood Offices Rents Commons Profits apprender out of Lands Advowsons and the like wherein a man hath any Franktenement and whereof he is seized ut de libero tenemento for all these are included under the word Tenement as well as Lands and other Inheritances which are holden Co. 1. inst 6. Perkins Sect. 114 115. 11 H. 6. 22 Bro. Grant 143. Finch 130. Womans Lawyer lib. 3. 188. Anderson 2. 4. But Tenement extends not to a Chattel or Lease for years Bro. Done 41. Grant 87. Bulstrode 1. 101. Turpine against Forreyner So that the Husband need not yield to the King the third part of his Leases for years for the Recusancy of his Wife Shall continue out of Prison A married Woman Imprisonment of the Wife for other cause convicted as a Popish Recusant is after her Conviction and before any further prosecution or any Election made by the Husband whether he will pay the Ten pounds per month or yield the third part of his Lands imprisoned by process of Law or for some other Cause not relating to such Conviction and afterwards is set at Liberty It seems that the Husband shall not pay the Ten pounds per month for the time she was in Prison for the Act speaks only of the time during which she continues out of Prison and although she were not imprisoned for her Recusancy yet seeing she had not during such her Imprisonment the benefit intended to her in consideration of the Ten pounds per month or third part viz. her Liberty the Husband shall not for that time pay the penalty here appointed to save her Imprisonment but if he pay it for the time after she is set at Liberty that is sufficient to satisfie the intent of this Act. But if after such Conviction Covinous Imprisonment the Wife be imprisoned by Covin upon some pretence not relating to such Conviction that shall not save the Husbands payment of the Ten pounds per month for the time she was imprisoned but after she is set at Liberty she may be again Imprisoned by force of this Act unless the Husband pay the Ten pounds per month or satisfie to the King the third part of the profits of his Lands as well for the time of such covinous Imprisonment as for the future for the covinous Imprisonment was upon the matter her own Act and no person shall take advantage of an Imprisonment covinously caused by him or her self 16 E. 4. 5. And here she continued out of Prison in the sence of this Act because her Imprisonment was not by Process of Law in invitam Outlawry by Covin And so if a Man be Outlawed while he is in Prison yet the Outlawry shall not be avoided for that Cause if the Imprisonment were by Covin or consent of the party Outlawed Co. 1. Inst. 259. 38. Assiz Pl. 17. Stat. iii Car. i. cap. ii An Act to restrain the passing or sending of any to be Popishly bred beyond the Seas FOrasmuch as divers ill affected persons to the true Religion established within this Realm Stat. Sect. 1. have sent their Children into Forreign parts to be bred up in Popery notwithstanding the restraint thereof by the Statute made in the first year of the Reign of our late Soveraign Lord King James of famous memory Be it Enacted that the said Statute shall be put in due execution And be it further Enacted by the Kings most Excellent Majesty and the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority of the same that in Case any person or persons under the Obedience of the King his Heirs and Successors He that goes himself or sends any other beyond the Seas to be trained up in Popery c. shall be disabled to sue c. and shall lose all his Goods and shall forfeit all his Lands c. for life at any time after the end of this Session of Parliament shall pass or go or shall convey or send or cause to be sent or conveyed any Child or other person out of any of the Kings Dominions into any the parts beyond the Seas out of the Kings Obedience to the intent and purpose to enter into or be resident or trained up in any Priory Abbey Nunnery Popish Vniversity Colledge or School or House of Iesuites Priests or in any private Popish Family and shall be there by any Iesuite Seminary Priest Friar Monk or other Popish Person instructed perswaded or strengthned in the Popish Religion in any sort to profess the same or shall convey or send or cause to be conveyed or sent by the hands or means of any person whatsoever any sum or sums of money or other thing for or towards the maintenance of any Child or other person already gone or sent or to go or to be sent and trained and instructed as is aforesaid or under the the name or colour of any Charity Benevolence or Alms towards the relief of any Priory Abbey Nunnery Colledge School or any Religious House whatsoever Every person so sending conveying or causing to be sent and conveyed as well any such Child or other person as any sum or sums of money or other thing and every person passing or being sent beyond the Seas being thereof Lawfully Convicted in or upon any Information Presentment or Indictment as is aforesaid shall be disabled from thenceforth to sue or use any Action Bill Plaint or Information in course of Law or to prosecute any Suit in any Court of Equity or to be Committée of any Ward or Executor or Administrator
to any person or capable of any Legacy or Deéd of Gift or to bear any Office within the Realm and shall lose and forfeit all his Goods and Chattels and shall forfeit all his Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Rents Annuities Offices and Estates of Fréehold for and during his natural Life Stat. Sect. 2. He that conforms shall not incur the penalties aforesaid Provided always That no person sent or conveyed as aforesaid that shall within Six months after his Return into this Realm conform himself unto the present Religion established in this Church of England and receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper according to the Statutes made concerning conformity in other Cases required from Popish Recusants shall incur any the penalties aforesaid Within Six months after his return And not within Six weeks as Wingate tit Crowne numb 157. erroneously Stat. Sect. 3. What Justices shall hear and determine these offences And it is Enacted That all and every of the offences against this Statute may be inquired heard and determined before the Iustices of the Kings Bench or Iustices of Assize or Goal delivery or of Oyer and Terminer of such Counties where the Offenders did last dwell or abide or whence they departed out of this Kingdom or where they were taken Or of Oyer and Terminer Justices of Peace Justices of Peace here excluded cannot take an Indictment upon this Statute for no inferior Court shall take Authority by any Statute unless it be specially named Savile 135. C. 212. Agard and Candish And although Justices of Peace have in their Commission an express Clause ad audiendum terminandum and by that are Justices of Oyer and Terminer yet forasmuch as there is a Commission of Oyer and Terminer known distinctly by that name and the Commission of Peace is known distinctly by another name they shall not be included under the general words of Justices of Oyer and Terminer as was adjudged Hill 30 Eliz. B. R. in the Case of Richard Smith who was Indicted at the Sessions of the Peace in the County of Oxon upon the Statute of 5 Eliz. cap. 14. Stat. 5 Eliz. 14 of forging Deeds which impowers the Justices of Oyer and Terminer to inquire of hear and determine that offence and yet the Indictment before the Justices of Peace was quashed as taken coram non Judice Co. 9.118 Co. 3. Inst. 103. Cro. Eliz. 87. vide Cro. Mich. 39 40 Eliz. 601. Wilsons Case Ibid. Mich. 41 42 Eliz. 697. Hunts Case Or where they were taken Vide Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 4. 3 Jac. 4. Sect. 21. Provided also That if any person or Child Stat. Sect. 4. In what Case the offenders Lands shall be restored again so passing or sent or now being beyond the Seas shall after his return into this Realm conform himself to the present Religion established in this Church of England and receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper according to the Statutes made for or concerning conformity in other Cases required from Popish Recusants for and during such time as he or she shall so continue in such conformity and obedience occording to the true intent and meaning of the said Laws and Statutes shall have his or her Lands restored to them again Addendum Stat. xxv Car. ii c. ii An Act for Preventing Dangers which may happen from Popish Recusants FOR preventing Dangers which may happen from Popish Recusants and quieting the minds of His Majesties good Subjects Be it Enacted by the Kings most Excellent Majesty by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by Authority of the same That all and every person or persons as well Péers as Commoners that shall bear any Office or Offices Civil or Military or shall receive any Pay Salary Fée or Wages by reason of any Patent or Grant from His Majesty or shall have Command or Place of Trust from or under His Majesty or from any of His Majesties Predecessors or by His or their Authority or by Authority derived from Him or them within the Realm of England Dominion of Wales or Town of Berwick upon Tweed or in His Majesties Navy or in the several Islands of Jersey and Guernsey or shall be of the Houshold or in the Service or Imployment of His Majesty or of his Royal Highness the Duke of York who shall inhabit reside or be within the City of London or Westminster or within Thirty miles distant from the same on the first day of Easter Term that shall be in the year of our Lord One thousand six hundred seventy threé or at any time during the said Term all and every the said person and persons shall personally appear before the end of the said Term or of Trinity Term next following in His Majesties high Court of Chancery or in His Majesties Court of Kings Bench and there in publick and open Court between the hours of Nine of the Clock and Twelve in the Forenoon take the several Oaths of Supremacy and Allegiance which Oath of Allegiance is contained in the Statute made in the third Year of King James by Law established and during the time of the taking thereof by the said person and persons all Pleas and Procéedings in the said respective Courts shall cease And that all and every of the said respective persons and Officers not having taken the said Oaths in the said respective Courts aforesaid shall on or before the First day of August One thousand six hundred seventy thrée at the Quarter Sessions for that County or place where he or they shall be inhabit or reside on the Twentieth day of May take the said Oaths in open Court betwéen the said hours of Nine and Twelve of the Clock in the Forenoon And the said respective Officers aforesaid shall also receive the Sacrament of the Lords Supper according to the Vsage of the Church of England at or before the First day of August in the year of our Lord One thousand six hundred and seventy thrée in some Parish Church upon some Lords day commonly called Sunday immediately after Divine Service and Sermon And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That all and every person or persons that shall be admitted entred placed or taken into any Office or Offices Civil or Military or shall receive any Pay Salary Fée or Wages by reason of any Patent or Grant of his Majesty or shall have Command or Place of Trust from or under his Majesty his Heirs or Successors or by his or their Authority or by Authority derived from him or them within this Realm of England Dominion of Wales or Town of Berwick upon Tweed or in his Majesties Navy or in the several Islands of Jersey and Gernsey or that shall be admitted into any Service or Imployment in his Majesties or Royal Highnesses Houshold or Family after the First day of Easter Term aforesaid and shall inhabit be
Verdict pass against him these are Convictions in Law but yet by these Convictions he forfeits nothing until Judgment nor shall the penalty of 20 l. per month run on or be appropriated to the King until Judgment be given By Convicted therefore is here to be understood convicted by Proclamation and Default or convicted by Verdict Confession c. and adjudged for so the word is here to be taken viz. for adjudged or attainted unless it be in Case of Conviction upon Proclamation And in such a sense it is to be taken in divers other Cases Stat. 23 Eliz. 1 Vide Stat. 23 Eliz. cap. 1. Sect. 5. When the 20 l per month is to be paid In such of the Terms of Easter or Michaelmas That is the Term of Easter or Michaelmas which shall first happen and not the next Easter and Michaelmas Terms both For the Recusant ought to pay the whole penalty for the time contained in the Indictment in the very first of those Terms next after his Conviction See for this Stat. 3 Jac. 4. Stat. 3 Jac. 4. Sect. 6. From what time the said penalty shall run on Stat. 23 Eliz. 1. 3 Jac. 4. For every month after such Conviction For what time the penalty of 20 l. per month shall run on after the Recusant is indicted and convicted and in what Cases the Informer and all others but the King shall be barred after such Conviction Vide Stat. 23 Eliz. cap. 1. antea Stat. 3 Jac. cap. 4. Sect. 6. postea Office Take seize and enjoy But as to Lands and Tenements there must first be an Office found for the King for regularly before the finding of such Office Lands or Tenements cannot be seized into the Kings hands Co. 2. Inst 573. Co. 8. 169. Paris Stoughters Case Bro. tit Office 17. 55. Plowden 486. Nicholls Case By this Statute the Queen was to have and enjoy two parts of the Recusants Lands and Hereditaments nomine poenae or districtionis The two parts not satisfactory of the twenty pounds per month until he had in some other manner satisfied her of the whole forfeiture of the Twenty pounds per month incurred for his Recusancy And the profits of those two parts should not have been accompted to go to the payment of any part of the said debt or forfeiture For the Statute inflicted this forfeiture upon him meerly as a farther penalty for his neglect of payment of the Twenty pounds per month as was resolved by the two Chief Justices and Chief Baron Trin. 43 Eliz. in Gages Case Cro. Eliz. 845. 846. and by all the Judges The Law now altered in that point 3 Jac. at Russell House Jones 24. Standen versus Vniversity d'Oxon Whitton But now the Law is altered in this point by the Statute of 1 Jac. cap. 4. Vide the Stat. infra Sect. 4. Stat. 1 Jac. 4 All the goods A Recusant is Indicted and Convicted Recusants goods when forfeited and then fails of payment of the Twenty pounds per month yet his goods are not forfeited to the King by this Statute before seizure For the King hath his Election whether he will seize them or no. By Coke Chief Justice B. R. 12. Jac. Rolles 1. 7. C. 8. Cullom versus Sherman A Recusant lends money Recognizance forfeited and for security hath a Rent-charge granted him in Fee by Deed indented with condition of redemption and takes likewise a Recognizance for performance of Covenants in the said Indenture The Recognizance is forfeited and afterwards he is Indicted and Convicted of Recusancy and fails of payment of the Twenty pounds per month In this case the King shall have the Recognizance by force of this Act for when forfeited to the Recusant it is but a chattel personal What is given to the King by this word Goods and shall pass to the King by this word goods For in an Act of Parliament where the Offenders goods are given to the King all debts and personal Chattels and Actions are thereby given him as well as goods in possession And here in this Act as take and seize refer to two parts of the Recusants Lands and Tenements so enjoy refers to goods And the King shall enjoy the debt due by the Recognizance Nor doth it alter the Case for that the Recognizance was acknowledged for performance of Covenants in an Indenture concerning a Rent-charge in fee which seems to savour of the realty for it was originally for the loan and forbearance of money which is personal Co. 12. 1. 2. Ford and Sheldons Case If a man who is a Recusant take such a Recognizance in the name of another Recognizance taken in anothers name forfeited the King upon his Conviction shall have the Recognizance for when the Recusant was such at the time of taking the Recognizance and so continued until the time of his Conviction it shall be intended that it was done by Covin and that he took it in the name of another with an intent to prevent the King of the levying of the forfeiture and such Covin shall not bar the King Co. 12. 2. 3. the same Case The Kings grant If a Recognizance or Obligation be forfeited to the King by force of this Act he may grant it over as he may any other Chattel in Action under his private Seal Rolles 1. 7. C. 8. Cullom versus Sherman Hereditaments Rent Advowson in gross Hereditaments A Rent of Inheritance and an Advowson in gross are comprehended under this word But whether the King may seize such an Advowson as part of his two parts and present by vertue thereof since the Stat. of 3 Jac. c. 5. which gives the Presentation to the Universities Stat. 3 Jac. 5 Vide that Stat. infra Sect. 19. All other the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments liable to such seisure or to the penalties aforesaid It hath been much disputed whether Copyhold Lands are within this Branch of the Statute Copyhold Lands if seizable for regularly in Acts of Parliament which are Enacted for forfeiture of Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Copyholds shall not be forfeited but only Lands Tenements and Hereditaments which are such at the Common Law and not those which are such by custom only as Copyholds are And it was agreed in Heydons Case Co. 3. 8. That where an Act of Parliament alters the service or tenure or other thing in prejudice of the Lord there general words in the Act shall not extend to Copyholds Vide Savile 67. C. 138. And if the King should seize them by force of the general words here viz. Lands Tenements and Hereditaments the Lord would during the time they are in the Kings hands lose his Seigniory Customs and Services But yet it was held by Manwood Chief Baron and Baron Clark in the Case of Sulherd and Everet Mich. 30 Eliz. That Copyholds are within this Act and although Manwood seemed to grant that they are not within