Selected quad for the lemma: land_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
land_n	good_a	lord_n	manor_n	1,411	5	10.3370	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A59706	Action upon the case for slander, or, A methodical collection under certain heads of thousands of cases dispersed in the many great volumns of the law, of what words are actionable and what not and of a conspiracy, and of a libel : being a treatise of very great use and consequence to all men, especially in these times, wherein actions for slander are more common than in times past : with an exact table annexed for the ready finding out of any thing therein / by W. Sheppard.	Sheppard, William, d. 1675?	1662 (1662)	Wing S3173A; ESTC R30143	259,716	226

double intendment doubtful meaning or the like no Action will lye upon them It is therefore agreed That if I have Land and am about the sale of Sect. 2. it in treaty with another or about to settle it on a Marriage and one that hath nothing to doe with it or makes no title to it shall say That I have no title to the Land or I have no right to it or I can make no good estate of the Land or that it is anothers Land or that another hath such an estate in it and set forth such a one as will disable the estate that I am now about to make this is Actionable As if I bee a Copy-holder for life of Land in a Mannour and the Lord is making a Lease of it after my life and is bid five hundred pound for it and I shall say I have a Lease for years of it after my life made by a former Lord this will be Actionable Coo. 4. 18. Croo. 2. 397. 337. Owens Rep. 32. Pophams Rep. 187. Croo. 2. 163. Yelvertons Rep. 88. Croo. 1. 99. But if it be so that I have only a purpose to sell it or to settle it upon Children and any man speaks such words about it this will not bear Action Croo. 2. 397. 337. 444. Pophams Rep. 187. Owens Rep. 32. Croo. 1. 99. And if one that claimes this Land as his owne shall say It is my Land or I have a Lease of it or the other hath no estate in it or hath no right to it or the like this is not Actionable Coo. 4. 18. so if I pretend Title to Land as Heir and another claims it as Heir and I say He is a Bastard and I am next Heir this is not Actionable Coo. 4. 17. Yelverton Rep. 80 88. And if a Counsellor shall say That his Clyent hath the better right to the Land or shall use other words in the course of his pleading pertinent and necessary to be said in order to the advance of the cause no Action will lye for this Coo. 4. 17. Trin. 25. Eliz. B. R. Banisters case If I have a Copy-hold of Inheritance within the jurisdiction of the Court of another and he saith That I have not any Title to those Lands if by this I have no special prejudice no Action will lye for it Croo. 1. 99. and yet if such a one that hath no Title to nor estate in it himself shall say that another hath an estate in it or title to it who hath no good but hath a colourable estate or title in it this will be Actionable so it is to say in such a case I know one that hath a Lease of the Land and hée will not part from it at any rate Mich. 37. 38. Eliz. B. R. Pennimans Case Mich. 20. Jac. Elborrows Case Croo. 1. 99 100. Croo. 2. 397 422 642. Croo. 4. 17. Coo. 1. 175. And if two have Leases of the same Land and hée that hath the last Lease which is not good shall say That the Land is his and the others estate is not good this is actionable Coo. 1. 175. Coo. 4. 18. And if I be about to sell my Land and J. S. shall pretend to and shew a Lease of it and it is counterfeit and hée know it to be so this is actionable Coo. 4. 18. So if a woman shall publish a Lease of the Land of another as made by her Husband and shall know it to be forged if by it the party have any special loss hée may have this action Coo. 4. 18. So if I bée about to sell my Land and another man shall say the Land is conveyed to J. S. and is his Land or that hée hath a Lease of it for years or the like this is actionable And so it is albeit there be a conveyance or Lease made to J. S. in truth if it bée not a good Conveyance or Lease in Law Coo. 1. 175. Coo. 4. 18. But for these words I had rather to buy the title of the younger Brother than of the elder Brother and the Plaintiff and that hee had seen an Indenture to lead the uses of a Fine whereby it did appear that the Plaintiff had no authority to sell the Land no Action will lye Crush vers Crush M. 3. Jac. B. R. And so it hath béen agréed That an Action will lye in the Cases following To say a man is a Bastard and not a rightful Heir to Land As I have Land as Son and Heir of J. S. and another shall say of mée I am a Bastard if by this I suffer any special prejudice there is no doubt I may have this Action against him Croo. 2. 642. And if I bée Heir apparent to my Ancestor who intends to settle his Land upon mée and by occasion of these words hée doth give it away from mée I may have this Action against him that speaketh the words Croo. 2 Bastardy 642. Croo. 2. 213. Godb. Rep. 421 451. pl. 519. Bulstr 2. part 90. Nay it séems the Law is That if one shall say of mée that I am a Bastard albeit I do not claim any Inheritance or to be Heir to any one person in certain and albeit I have not any present or special damage by it yet that these words are actionable Croo. 2. 642. Croo. 2. 213. Godb. Rep. 421 451. pl. 519. Bulstr 2. part 90. And if I have but a remote possibility of Land as where an entail is of Land on my Father and the Heirs of his body whereof I am the youngest of many and hée is about the sale of this Land and I am bid mony for this possibility and then one shall say of mée I am a Bastard and after that the Purchaser refuse to give mée any thing for my possibility in this case I may have this Action against him for it Croo. 2. 213. Godb. Rep. 421 451. pl. 519. CHAP. IV. Of the Scandalum Magnatum SCandalum Magnatum is a wrong done to some eminent person of the Scandalum Magnatum What. Land as Duke Earl Baron Chancellour Treasurer Privy-Seal Justice of the one Bench or of the other by false news or false messages whereby debates and discords betwéen them or any scandal to their persons Sect. 1. may arise Stat. 2. R. 2. chap. 5. Westm 1. chap. 34. In this Case the party defamed may have his Action in the name of the The punishment of it King and his own Name upon the Stat. of 2. R. 2. And hereby shall recover damages for the wrong and the party may also be otherwise punished And if the slander be divulged in the nature of a Libel it is punishable by Indictment and great Fines are imposed for this offence for that the reproach of such persons is the reproach of the King and State it self Coo. 5. 125. Old Book of Entries 593. Crompton Jur. 35. 19. 13. For the knowledge of this wherein this Action is given to a great

Innuendo will not help for that actionable words must import in themselves precise slander without ambiguousnesse so that every one that hears them may intend of whom they be spoken For it was said that hée spake the words of the Plaintiff and the Iury found him guilty And this difference was taken where the words in themselves import apparent incertainty and when they may be ascertained by Intendment In the first Case no Averment will aid it But in the last Case by Averment an Averment and a Verdict it may be aided And therefore where the words be One of my Brothers is perjured this is so incertain that neither of them can bring an Action and if he be found guilty by Verdict it will not help But here it did not appear that hée had more Brothers than one and then it may be certain enough and here it is expressy averred to be spoken of him and the Iury hath found him guilty and therefore it is here certain enough And this Case was cited by the Court to be adjudged for the Plaintiff That murdrous Knave Stroughton lay in wait to murder mee And upon this one Thomas Stroughton brought the Action and said they were spoken of him And upon not guilty pleaded and a Verdict for the Plaintiff it was adjudged after divers motions to arrest the Iudgement for the Plaintiff Croo. 2. 108. Case 225. Sir Thomas Gresham versus Grindsley Thy Brother was a fool and was never born to do himself any good for that he could not hold his hand from ratifying and subscribing to his Fathers Will notwithstanding I have that to shew in my house that if his heir Elizabeth Gresham do not any such Act as hee hath done it shall bring her to inherit Titsley Sir Tho. upon this sues the Defendant And shews how his Father was seized Slander of a Title to Land of the Mannor of Titsley and of other Lands and by his will devised to A. his wife for life the Remainder in Tail to the Plaintiff and how the Father had issue William the eldest which had issue Elizabeth his Daughter and Heir and this Plaintiff the youngest Son and that A. is dead and the Plaintiff entred and the Defendant to slander his Title spake these words before and shewed further how hée had an intention to make a Ioynture to his Wife and to passe divers parcels of the Land devised to him to his younger children for their advancements and that hée was hindred in his intent by these words ad damnum a hundred pound and upon not guilty pleaded it was found for the Plaintiff and twenty pound damages But Iudgement was given for the Defendant 1 For that it doth not appear by any thing in the Declaration that the Plaintiff is damnified viz. that hée was about to sell it or has entred into any Bond to make a Ioynture to his wife which by reason of these words would not be accepted and there ought to be some special matter shewed in which damage may be apparent Coo. 4. 18. For upon such general words no special slander may be imposed As if a Lease for life be with a condition to re-enter and J. S. shall say That hee can shew that which will bring him in Reversion to the possession this is no slander of the Title for the very Lease it self by the Indenture by which the Land was devised will bring him to it either by the condition or by the determination of the estate 2 For that it doth appear by the Plaintiffs own shewing that Elizabeth is Heir at Common Law and that the Plaintiff himself had but an estate tail and upon the determination of it Elizabeth will have Titsley as general Heir and the Defendant doth not shew any time certain when Elizabeth shall have it but indefinitely and this shall be taken in meliori sensu Yelverton Rep. 88. Coo. lib. Entries 35. Case 226. Mich. 4. Jac. B. R. Earl of Northumberland versus Birches In an Slander of a Title to Land Action for the slander of a Title The Plaintiff declared that Henry Earl of Arundel was seized in Fée of the Mannor of D. and gave it to the plaintiff in tail and that the Defendant was a Customary Tenant for life of a messuage parcel of the said Mannor And the Plaintiff was in Communication with J. S. to make a Lease for years to him to make a Lease for years of the Land to him to begin after the estate of the Defendant for life was determined for which J. S. agréed to give him five hundred pound that the Defendant intending to hinder that bargain and slander his Title spake these words The late Earl of Arundel Lord of the Mannor of D. did make a Lease of my Tenement to one J. D. for sixty years to begin after my customary estate ended and the same is a good Lease Whereas the said Earl did not make such a Lease by reason whereof neither J. S. nor any other person would give him ten pound for the Lease The Defendant justified that Henry Earl of Arundel before the Gift made to the Plaintiff made such a Lease to J. S. for sixty years and that J. S. conveyed the Lease to him It was objected that the words import not any slander nor is it alledged when the Earl made the Lease But the opinion of the Court was that the words shall be taken in the worse sense according to his intent which hée spake when hée said it to be a good Lease And the words themselves imply that hée spake them to countenance the Title of a stranger which is not lawful and now hée cannot excuse himself by intituling of himself when at the first the words did not import as much and now hée cometh too late to justifie Croo. 2. 163. Case 227. M. 3. Car. B. R. Law and Harwoods Case In this Action for a slander of a Title The Plaintiff declared that hée was seized in Fée as a Coppy-holder Slander of a Title to Land of Land in D. within the Iurisdiction of the Defendants Court and that the Defendant said Hee had not any title to those Lands It was found for the Plaintiff And upon a Writ of Errour brought the Iudgement was reversed because the plaintiff did not shew that by occasion of the words hée had any prejudice as by any bargain of Inheritance or Lease of the Land And this Action is not maintainable without shewing a special prejudice Croo. 1. part last publisht 99. Case 228. M. 6. Jac. B. R. Vaughan versus Ellis M. 6. Jac. B. R. Errour of a Iudgement in the Exchequer-Chamber in an Action of the Case for words for saying Hee is a Bastard The Errour assigned was that the Action lyes not for these words without special cause shewn that hee was damnified by them as to alledge that hée was inheritable to some Lands and that by reason of those words hée is to have losse And here it

words for calling of him Bastard And the cause of the Errour was laid to be that the Action lies not for these words without special cause shewn that hée was damnified by them as that hée was inheritable to some Lands and by reason thereof he Hindrance of preferment is to have losse And here it is shewn that such Land was given in tail to his Grandfather and that his Father had divers Sons whereof the Plaintiff is youngest Son and his Elder Brothers are living and that such a one was to buy the Land and offered him so much for his Title And by reason of those words refused to give him any thing In this case it was For saying of one Hee is a Bastard agréed that albeit hée had no present Title but a possibility and being offered mony for it and having lost this gain by the words and in futuro might receive prejudice in case hee were to claim any Land by descent And for these causes they held the words actionable and did affirm the Iudgement Croo. 2. 213. Case 132. An Action of the Case was brought for speaking of these words viz. J. S. For saying Thou hast had Bastards 34. years since had two Bastards and hath paid for the nursing of them and the Plaintiff shewed that by reason of these words contention grew betwirt him and his wife almost to a divorce and it was adjudged that an Action would not lye for the words and the Chief Iustice said that an Action upon the Case doth not lye for every ill word but for words by speaking of which the Plaintiff is damnified and that cannot be in this Case the time being so long past And the causes wherefore a man shall be punished for saying that a man hath a Bastard are two the one because by the Statute of 14. Elz. The offender is to be punished for the same And secondly because the party by such means is discredited or hindered in his preferment Godbolt Rep. Case 385. Pasche 16. Jac. B. R. Case 133. Sir Gilbert Gerrard brought an Action against Mary Dickinson and Slander of a Title declared that hée was seized of the Land in Fée and was in treaty to make a Lease of it for two and twenty years at a hundred pound a year Rent to R. Egerton and that the Defendant knowing of it said I have a Lease of the Mannor and Castle of H. which was the same Land for ninety years and published it c. by reason whereof R. Egerton did not procéed In this Case it was agréed that no Action would lye for the words although they were false because the Defendant did pretend an interest in the Land So if the Defendant had said that the Plaintiff had no right to the Land but that shee her self had right to it no Action would lye for this Coo. 4. 18. Case 134. An Action upon the Case was brought for these words viz. Thou art a For saying Thou art a Couzener and Bankerupt Couzener and Bankerupt and hast an occupation to deceive men by the words were spoken of a Gentleman who had a hundred pound Land per annum to live upon and therefore although hée used to buy and sell Iron yet because hée was not a Merchant nor did live by his Trade the better opinion of the Court was that the words were not actionable and so adjudged Godb. Rep. Case 45. Hill 28. Eliz. B. R. Case 135. Pasche 15. Car. 1. Smiths Case One said Thou art forsworn and hast Charge of Perjury taken a false Oath at Hereford Assizes against J. S. And the opinion of the Court was against the Action But it was said it would have lyen for this Thou art forsworn and hast taken a false Oath at the Assizes against J. S. with an Averment that hée was sworn in the cause March Rep. pl. 17. Smiths Case Pasche 15. Car. 1. Case 136. Easter 15. Car. 1. Molton versus Clapham The Defendant upon reading Perjury Affidavids in Court openly in the presence and hearing of the Iustices and Lawyers said There is not a word true in the Affidavids which I will prove by forty witnesses March Rep. pl. 45. Molton versus Clapham Easter 15. Car. 1. Case 137. Mich. 15. Car. 1. Johnson versus Dyer The Case was this The Defendant Incertain charge of Felony having spéech with the Father of the Plaintiff said to him I will take my Oath that your Son stole my Hens But did not averr that hée was his Son or that hee had but one Son and it was held not good March Rep. pl. 96. Mich. 15. Car. 1. Case 138. Mich. 15. Car. 1. Just Crooks Case It was agreed That if one had preferred Manner of divulging of a Slander a Bill in the Starr-Chamber against a Iudge for Corruption in his office and then shall go unto a Tavern or other place and tell the effect of it that this is actionable March Rep. pl. 119. Case 139. Pasche 17. Car. 1. B. R. Sir Richard Greenfields Case The Action agreed Charge of couzening to be maintainable for this Thou hast received mony of the King to buy new Saddles and hast couzened the King and bought old Saddles for the Troopers for hee may thereby lose his office or imployment So if hee had said these words of the Kings Sadler March Rep. pl. 135. Case 140. Trin. 17. Car. 1. Co. B. Action was brought for this Thou hast killed my Charge of Murder Lack of Averment Brother Innuendo C. c. fratrem nuper mortuum and it was held by the whole Court not actionable without averment that hee was dead and that the Innuendo will not do it March Rep. pl. 187. See Hobb Rep. pl. 11. Case 141. Trin. 17. Car. 1. Hawes Case The Action was brought for these words Charge of speaking against the book of Common-Prayer Averment Necessary My couzen Hawes hath spoken against the Book of Common-Prayer and said it is not fit to be read in the Church with an averment of a special losse by it that hée was called into the Spiritual Court and the Plaintiff had Iudgement in it March Rep. pl. 191. Case 142. Mich. 17. Car. 1. Co. B. Baine sued for these words That hee kept a Charge of cheating and couzening Averment false Bushel whereby hee did cheat and couzen the poor But hée set forth that hée was a Farmer did use to sow Land and sell the Corn and thereby maintained himself and his Family and that the words were spoken to one that did use to buy of him and that by reason of the words hée lost his custome And it was adjudged actionable March Rep. pl. 192. Case 143. Mich. 17. Car. 1. Co. B. A. sued for these words That hee kept false Couzening weights and hée set forth that hée got his living by buying and selling but did not shew of what Trade or Profession he was and agréed that the Action