the Lands were parcel of the possessions of the Priory of Christs Church in Canterbury and the said Prior and his Predecessors had held it discharged of Tythes tempore dissolutionis and pleaded the Statute of 31 H. 8. The Defendant pleads that the Prior and A non decimando his Predecessors did not hold them discharged and upon issue joyned thereon the evidence was that the Prior or his Predecessors time out of mind c never paid Tythes but no cause was shewn either by unity of possession real composition or other cause to shew it discharged In nil debet upon the Statute for tythes a Lay person cannot give a Non decimando in evidence so may the King and any other spiritual persons li. 2 B. of Winchesters Case Cook said it was no evidence for it is a prescription in non decimando Curia contra For a spiritual man may prescribe in non decimando and by the Statute of 31 H. 8. he shall hold it discharged as the Prior held it and if he held it discharged non refeit by what means for it shall be intended by lawful means and the Jury afterwards found for the Plaintiff Cro. 3. part 2. 6. Vpon non assumpsit in a general Indebitatus Indebitatus assumsit assumpsit the Defendant may give in evidence payment at any time before the Action brought but upon a special promise to pay money c. it is otherwise Causa patet for in the first case if there be no Debt the Law will infer no promise If a Church-book or any thing else is given A Church-Book is no evidence Brownlow 1. part 207. Postea 26. Assise pl. 4. in evidence which ought not to be allowed the Court above cannot quash the Verdict except it be certified and returned with the Postea Brownlow 1 part 207. But the Court may order a new Tryal upon cause shewed as for excessive damages c. The Court will not permit the Jury to carry any Writings out with them but what are proved and under Seal But here I recollect my self and consider that this Chapter is of greatest use to our Circuit practiser and therefore I shall go no further in scatter'd instances but digest my further Collections into a method more beneficial which may be improved by any Practiser as other matter shall occur Quare defendens Crimen feloniae ei imposuit Action of tâ—e Câ—sâ— c. the Plaintiff cannot give in evidence words only but Acts as arresting charging or conventing him before Justice of Peace for felony Sanders vers Edwards Mich. 14 Car. 2. B. R. If any action arises on request as in Trover or special promise the Statute of limitation goes only to the request Juy's case Mich. 1652. C. B. v. 1 Cro. 139. Declaration for words spoken in the presence of A. B. and others in evidence it sufficeth that they were spoken in the presence of others only Wingfield and Coote Lent Assises Norf. 1662. per Hale Ch. Baron In Indebitatus for carrying of Herrings the evidence was he was a Porter at Yarmouth and when Herring-Ships came home he went of his own head and carried up to the Defendants house with other Porters so many Herrings and Good by Twisden Judge of Assise Norf. Summer 1662. Jermin vers Lucas In action for hindring to sit in a Pew claimed by prescription repaired c. ought to be given in evidence and one may prescribe to sit in the uppermost seat in a Pew Buckston and Bateman Mich. 14 Car. 2. B. R. In action for executing an illegal Warrant c. It 's good evidence to prove the Just of Peace acted as such without shewing his Commissâ—on so on the Statute of Hue and Cry Constables case Norf. Lent Assises per Hale Chief Baron Action for stopping up lights c. One had a piece of Ground and builds an house on part and Leases it then he sells the other part of the Ground to one who builds on it and stops up the lights of the first house the Lessee has a good action But if two owe two pieces of Ground and one builds the other may also build and stop up his lights Palmer vers Flesher Mich. 15 Car. 2. B. R. If a Master always gives his servant money to buy his Markets with it is good evidence to discharge the Master in an action brought against him for goods taken up on Trust by that servant Per Glyn Ch. Just Mich. 1658. at Guild-Hall Sr. Tho. Rouses case A water course runs through my Ground to the Grounds of J. S. where is a pit that time out of mind used to be filled with that water I may stop the water in my Ground and use it as I will so I do not turn the course another way but when I have done with it let it fall into its own course Per St. John Ch. Just C. B. Suff. Summer Assises 1657. Smart and Tystead Action for words You forswore your self in your answer in Chancery Defendant justifies Plaintiff replies de Injurià suà propriâ absque tali causa per Hale Summer Assise Suff. It 's a good replication and a small mistake in an answer shall not convict of perjury for the Councel may mistake or his Clerk Action for not scouring a Ditch by which the water overflowed his Land c. and declare quod quidam Rivus run there c. Vpon evidence it appeared only a Land-floud and good by name of Rivus though it be dry great part of the year and it was held the best pleading of the course of this River to put a place from whence it comes so to the Plaintiffs Land without mentioning mean places by which it passes which may be many and must be proved if laid per Whitfield 1641. York Clayton 96. Souldiers lying in an Inn 14 days are guests within the Custom of England Harlands Case per Whitfield 1647. The Plaintiff in action of the case intitles himself by prescription to a Fold course for Sheep upon all the Lands in such a Field on Mich. day and so to Lady day the Lands being unsown and for that the Defendant put on Sheep c. before Mich. day and after and thereby fed the grounds c. the Plantiff could not take so good feed actio inde 1. The owner may put on Sheep and feed his own grounds before Mich. unless a Custom be to the contrary which ought to be laid in the declaration Contrà of a stranger 2. It appearing that part of the Lands c. had been the Lands of the Plaintiff who was Lord of the Mannor and prescribed as such and there being no exception of those Lands in the prescription the Plaintiff was nonsuit for as to those Lands the prescription was gone by unity of possession Per Hale Ch. Baron Norf. Summer Assises 1668. Branthwait vers Hunt Assumpsit In Indebitatus covenant to pay is no evidence 2 Cro. 505. nor money due for rent by
that the Sow was with Pigg when she was taken and afterwards cast her Piggs in the Custody of the defendant and the Plaintiff recovered Damages for says Bro. Aridg tit General Issue 88. This is a special taking in Law Dower of rent Hill ne unque seisie que Dower la poit Dower Horton J S. granted the rent to the Husband payable at Michaelmas next and the Husband dyed before the day and so he was seised in Law and demanded judgment Thirm You shall say generally quod seisie que Dower la poit and give your Case in evidence Et sic bene notwithstanding the doubt of the lay Gents for they ought to credit the Law and evidence is not to be pleaded 11 H. 4. 88. Tenant for life leaseth for years who is ousted and the Tenant for life is disseised The disseisor leaseth for years who sows the Land The Tenant for Life dies he in remainder in Fee brings Trespass against the Defendants claiming the Emblements Emblements Knivets Case lib. 5. 85. by the Lessee of the Disseisor Adjudged that they had not the meer right but in respect of their possession they should barr the Plaintiff who had no right and that the meer right was in the Lessee of the Tenant for Life and that he might bring Trespass against the Lessee of the Disseisor and recover all the mean profits But as to the entry into the Land to take the Emblements this was good matter of justificaâ—ion but in regard it was not pleaded it could not be given in evidence upon Not Guilty and therefore the Plaintiff had judgment for the entry and was barred for the residue Note that the Lessee of Tenant for Life had right to the Land and by consequence to the Emblements as things annexed to the Land and the death of the Tenant for Life determins his interest to the Land but his right to the Emblements remains It sufficeth to prove the substance without any precise Regula Substance Circumstance regard to the Circumstance As if an Indictment be that with a Dagger the offender gave another a mortal wound c. and in evidence it is proved to be done with a Sword Rapier Club Bill or any other Weapon the offender upon this evidence ought to be found guilty For the mortal wound is the substance and the manner of the Weapon is but the Circumstance yet some Weapon ought to be mentioned in the Indictment And so if A. B. and C. be indicted for killing of J. S. and that A. stroke and the other were Abettors To prove that B. stroke is sufficient c. Manslaughter upon an Indictment must be found if proved because the killing is substance upon which judgment shall be given Indictments for â—urther of Ministers of Justice in execution of their Office may be general viz. that the prisoners felonice voluntarie ex malitia sua praecogitata c. percusserunt c. without alledging the special matter which may be given in evidence for the Law implyes malice prepensed So if a Thief in robbing kills the man that resists him or a man is killed without any provocation or without malice prepensed that can be actually proved the Law adjudges this murder and implyes the malice and in these Cases the offenders may be indicted generally that they killed of malice prepense for the malice implyed by Law given in evidence is sufficient to maintain the general Indictment lib. 9. 67. Machallyes Case So of an Indictment as accessary to 2. to prove accessary to 1. is sufficient lib. 9. 119. In Cromwels Case lib. 4. 12. Although it was objected that in an Action of slander If the Defendant will justifie he must justifie the same words in the same sense as it is laid in the Nar. or else he must plead Not Guilty and give the special matter that is the variance in evidence Yet the Court held that the Defendant should not be put to the general Issue but might justifie although he varied from the Plaintiff in the sense and Copyhold In Pilkintons Case Stiles 450. Rolls said If Copies of Court Roll be shewed to prove a Customary Estate the enjoyment of such Estates must also be proved otherwise the proof is not good Forger Totum pars quality of the words and might set forth the coherent words As for calling the Plaintiff Murderer the Defendant may shew that they were speaking of Hares and the words were spoken in reference to killing of Hares Upon the Issue if the Lord of the Mannor granted the Lands per copiam rotulorum Curiae manerii pred secundum consuetudinem manerii pred To prove that there were customary Lands in the Mannor and that the Lord of late granted the Land c. per Copiam rotul Curiae where it was never granted by Copy before is no good evidence to find the Custom or that the Lands c. were grantable or demiseable by Custom Leon. 55. Kemp and Carters Case Forger of a Deed in which is contained a demise of the site of the Mannor of R. and terras dominicales c. A Deed of the site and all the Demesnes of the said Mannor Exceptis duabus clausuris c. is good evidence for it is not necessary to construe terras dominicales c. omnes terras dominicales c. for Lands not excepted are terrae dominicales and so the Count is satisfied by that evidence Leon 139. Atkins and Hales Case Debt against an Executor upon plene administravit it appeared that the Executor medled and administred Plene administravit and then refused in Court and administration was granted to another and that several summs were recovered against the Administrator it was said by Periam Justice 1. That if an Administrator who is a stranger administer without the Commandment of the Executor the Executor cannot give such administration in evidence to prove his Issue 2. That in the principal Case the Executor having administred he could not refuse and so the administration is granted without cause and what he did was without warrant and no administration Ieon 134. Hawkins and Lawse Case At Bury Assises 1682. before Judge Windham The Executor gave the administration of the Administrator in evidence and allowed but there what the Administrator did was by the Executors consent in Mr. Lun and his Mothers Case An Executor de son tort cannot give in evidence Plene administravit An Executor pleads plene administravit praeter a judgment replication and Issue that the judgment was fraudulent The Obligee who had the judgment was denyed to have evidence about his Debt for he sweareth to have Assets for himself and is interested in the thing Before Judge Windham at Bedford Assises 1682. his retaining of goods to pay himself for he cannot retain but if he takes out letters of Administration although pendente lite he may retain for a Debt of as high a Nature and plead this in Barr for
11. In Trespass the Buttals must be proved as they are laid If the Defendant plead payment to a Bond Payment by presumption or Bill and it appears the Debt is very old and it hath not been demanded nor any use paid for it many years common presumption is good evidence that the money is paid and the Juries use to find for the Defendants in such cases If the Trespass were in truth done the 4th Trespass another day of May and the Plaintiff alledgeth the same to be done the 5th of May or the first of May when no Trespass was done yet if upon evidence it falleth out that the Trespass was done before the Action brought it sufficeth 1 Inst 283. 'T is dangerous to permit evidence to a Deed. Jury by Witnesses that there was such a Deed which they have seen or read or prove the Deed by a Copy because the Deed may be upon Condition Limitation or power of Revocation and if this should be permitted the whole Reason of the Common Law in shewing Deeds to the Court would be subverted for the Deed might be imperfect and void which the Witnesses could not perceive yet in cases of extremity as where the Deed was burned or lost by some other notorious accident the Judges may at their discretion allow them to be proved by Witnesses li. 10. 92. and so of a Record In Case against an Executor whereas Executor the Testator was indebted to the Plaintiff thâ— Executor promised to pay the debt in consideration the Plaintiff would forbear to sue him the Executor may give in evidence upon Non assumpsit that there was no Debt or that he had no Assets tempore promissionis for then there would be no Consideration li. 9. 94. William Banes Case upon the issue neunques Executor to prove an Administration granted to him is good evidence Dyer 305. Evidence shall never be pleaded but the Evidence matter of fact shall be pleaded and if it be denied the evidence shall be given to the Jury not to the Court lib. 9. 9. Evidence that the Wife of every Copy-holder shall have the Land durante viduitate will not maintain the issue that the Custom of a Mannor is that she shall have the Land during her life after Estate for life her Husbands death because though durante viduitate imports an Estate for life yet an Estate durante vita is more large and beneficial li. 4. 30. Things done before the memory of man What may be given in Evidence in another County or in another Kingdom may be given in Evidence to a Jury as Assets in another County c. More 47. See li. 4. 22. 9. 27. 28. 34. li. 6. 46 47. Vpon issue payment at the day payment Payment before or after the day is no Evidence More 47. but upon Nil debet it is good Evidence because it proves the issue Vpon issue Assets or no Assets or seised or not seised if one give a Feoffment c. in Evidence Covin may be given in Evidence Covin by the other but not if the issue be infeoffed or not infeoffed for it is a Feoffment tiel quel though made by Covin li. 5. 60. Hob. 72. The Book of Doomesday brought in Doomesday-book Court is good Evidence to prove the Land to be ancient Demesne Hob. 188. In Attaint the Plaintiff shall not Attaint give more evidence nor examine more Witnesses than was before but the Defendant may Dyer 212. Copies of the Court-Rolls are the only Court-Rolls for Copy-holders evidence for Copy-holders for as Littleton Sect. 75. tells you they are called Tenants by Copy of Court-Roll because they have no other Evidence concerning their Tenements but only the Copies of Court-Rolls But Cook explains the Text and says This is to be understood of Evidences of Alienation for a Release of a Right by Deed. A Copy-holder that cometh in by way of admittance may have and that is sufficient to extingish the Right of the Copy-holder which he that maketh the Release had In Actions upon the Case Trespass Battery or false imprisonment against any Iustice of Peace Mayor or Bayliff of City or Town Corporate Headborough Portreve Special Evidence upon the general issue by whom Constable Tythingman Collector of Subsidy or Fifteen in any of his Majesties Courts at Westminst or elsewhere concerning any thing done by any of them by reason of any of their Offices aforesaid and all other in their ayd or assistance or by their Commandment c. They may plead the general issue and give the special matter of their excuse or Iustification in Evidence 7 Jac. cap. 5. General acts of Parliament may be given Statutes in Evidence and need not be pleaded and so may general Pardons given by Parliament if they be without Exceptions But commonly advantage of the Act is given by the Act it self to the offnder without pleading it as by the late most truly Pardons so called general act of Indempnity every person thereby pardoned may plead the general issue and give the act in evidence for his discharge which are general and which particular Statutes see lib. 4. 76. Vpon not guilty in Trover the Defendant Trover may give in Evidence that the goods were pawned to him for 10 l. That he distrained them for Rent or damage feasant That as Sheriff he levied them upon Execution or that he took them as Tythes severed Cro. 1. part 157. 3 part 435. Hob. 187. A demand and denial of the goods is evidence of a conversion If there be two Batteries between Plaintiff and Defendant at divers times the If there be two Trespasses and the Defendant peads a Justification if the Plaintiff replies de injuria sua propria c. he cannot give in Evidence a Trespass at another time But he should have replyed that at another time in the same day of his Count the Defendant did the other Trespass c. to which the Defendant may plead another Justification but the Plaintiff cannot then plead a Trespass at another time but must conclude Sans tiel cause c. vide Apres Plaintiff is bound to prove the Battery made the same day in the Declaration and shall not be admitted to give another day in evidence as the case may be As in Battery the Defendant pleaded Son assault Demesne and the Plaintiff replyed de injuria sua propria absque tali sua and in evidence the Defendant maintained that the Plaintiff beat him the day mentioned in the Declaration and in the same place which the Plaintiff perceiving he gave in evidence that the battery was made another day and place to which the Defendant demurred upon the difference aforesaid Brownlow 1 part 233. 19 H. 6. 47. But upon not guilty it is otherwise though there be never so many Batteries between the parties Littleton Sect. 485. Prohibition for suing for Tythes in Booking Park in Essex and surmised that
eadem c. The Plaintiff replies de injuriâ suâ propriâ c. The evidence was that the Plaintiff as Lady of the Mannor took the Horse as an Estray and it was Cryed and Marked c. that the Defendants refused to pay for the meat and took him away before the year and a day was out 1. Per Wadh. Wyndham Just d'assize A Lord may detain an Estray for meat yet no Trespass lies if the owner takes him but an action of the Case lies for the meat 2. If the action had been brought against the servant only he must justifie c. But being brought against Master and Servant this joynt-justification is good Cambr. Summer Assises 1667. Lady Hatton against Cotes and al. In Trespass the evidence for the Defendant was that the Defendant had a Barn and purschased a way over the Plaintiffs Land to that Barn after the Defendant bought other Lands lying contiguous to that Barn on the one side and to a Haven on the other side and carried Carriages by that way to the Barn and through it over his own new purchased Land to the Haven Per Hale Ch. Baron If I purchase a general way to such a place I may go from thence on my own ground whither I please though I purchase the ground after the way purchased Summer Assises Norf. 1665. Heynsworth vers Bird. Trespass was brought against many by a School-mistress for taking away a child her Scholar with a Scarfe of the Mistresses per Keeling Ch. Just In Trespass for taking things all are principals that are present and consenting Contra in taking persons and this action lies not by the Mistress for the child but for the Scarfe only Lent Norf. Ass 1663. Mary Coopers case Trespass lies for Lessee in Ejectment on a fictitious Lease to recover mean profits during the continuance of that Lease mentioned on Record And the Recovery shall maintain it Otherwise if brought by the Lessor for he is no party to the action Trespass lies not for pulling down a Pew in a Church fastned to a pillar with a Chain Contra had it been fixed by nails driven into the pillar per Glyn Ch. Just Trevors case Trespass quare fregit liberam Warrenam suam and took his Conies In evidence it appeared that the Plaintiff had liberty of chase in the place which though it includes Warren yet a general Trespass lies not but an action of the case E. of Arundels case Pasch 1658. B. R. Per Earl Sergeant if Beasts be impounded and the Key lost the Officer by Replevin may break the pound and deliver the Cattle per Stat. Marlebridge 52 H. 3. 21. Tenants in Common must joyn in Trespass done against them so Avowry Lead and Lamsteads case 7 Car. B. R. cited by Finch in Argument Or Tenant in Common surviving shall have Trespass In Trespass the Defendant sets forth a conditional Feoffment for payment of money at such a day and place and that he paid it accordingly issue joyned on the payment at the day and place evidence of payment before the day is not good Contra had the special matter been pleaded with acceptance More 47. In Trespass with Continuando to recover mean profits an Entry and possession of the Land before the Trespass must be proved and also another Entry after the Trespass In Trespass the Defendant prescribes to dig in the Common for Clay to repair antient houses holden of that Mannor and good Berney vers Stafford Norf. Lent Assises 1667. In Trespass they were at issue on Not Guilty and at the Assises the Defendant left his former plea and pleaded an accord with satisfaction the Iudge would have had it replied to and tryed presently but the Councel refused whereupon the Jury was sworn and the Plaintiff nonsuited Bedford Assises Lent 1667. Green vers Reynolds But this was contrary to the opinion of Sir Orlando Bridgeman at the same Assises and Contr. to 10 H. 7. 21. and 1 Bul. 92. Trespass lies by Recoveror in Erroneous Iudgement for a mean Trespass because the Plaintiff in Writ of Error recovers all mean profits and the Law by fiction of relation will not make a wrong doer dispunishable 13. rep Co. 22. but Contra where Act of Parliament restores c. Trespass for assault and wounding in Suff. the Defendant as to vi armis non Cul. As to the other justification of molliter Manus c. in Norf. and several Tryals Per Hale Ch. Baron Suff. Ass Summer 1668. the vi armis can't be tryed till the other be tryed Contr. If the first issue of non Cul. was as to the wounding and by him evidence of Livery of seisin generally shall be intended for life only The Hogs of B. were put into the yard of A. and broke into the Land of C. and did Trespass action lies against A. though the servant of B. did look to them and serve them by which the owner had the special possession of them So if Agisted Cattle do Trespass the Agistor shall answer Dawtry vers Huggins Clayton 33. per Barkley 11 Car. York A. by Indent of uses raised an Estate to B. in Fee who regrants Turbary to A. by another Deed and after A. levies a fine to confirm the Estate and uses abovesaid declared this doth not touch the Turbary per Vernon 11 Car. York Clayton 42. Any one imployed by an Officer is an Officer within 7 Jac. 5. to plead general issue and give the special matter in evidence Clayton 54. Prescription to tether Equos Boves upon such a balk c. Mares and Cowes good evidence within that prescription Per Barkley Clayton 54. Per Hale A Corporation may bargain and sell though it has been thought an use upon use they being seised to the use of their house But I think it rather a trust than an use If a Just of P. send his Warrant to I. S. who is no Officer to bring one before him if I. S. be no Officer he is not bound to execute it yet if he does execute it it 's good and he may execute it in any part of the County And so a Constable of one Town may execute a Warrant in any other Town in the same County and any such Warrant is as large as the Justices Commission is per Hale Norf. Summer Assises 1668. Wrongries case In Trespass against one for Gleaning on his ground per Hale Norf. Sum. Assises 1668. The Law gives licence to the poor to glean c. by the general Custom of England but the licence must be pleaded specially and can't be given in evidence on non Cul. Trover The Citizens of London gave in evidence their Custom to take Toll Jones 240. In Trover for an Horse proved of 15 l. value the Jury gave but 3 l. damages upon mistake they thinking that the Plaintiff had his Horse again Per Wadh. Wyndham if the Jury had not been gone they should have mended their Verdict but a new action of
assisas in ComÌ„ N. Capiend assignÌ„ ê‘ formam statuti c. venÌ„tam infra nominatÌ„ J. A. quaÌ„ infra scriptÌ„ H. C. ê‘ atturnatÌ„ suos infra ContentÌ„ IurÌ„ Iure unde infra fit mentio ExactÌ„ similitÌ„ venerÌ„ Qui ad veritatem de infra ContentÌ„ dicend electi triati Iurati fuerÌ„ Super quo pÌ„d H. ê‘ quendam J. B. de Consilio ipsius H. C. manutentione exitus interius IunetÌ„ Coram pÌ„fatÌ„ IustÌ„ IurÌ„ pÌ„d in Evidentijs oftend dicÌ„ quod c. Here recite the Evidence truely unde petitÌ„ IudiciuÌ„ qd IurÌ„ pÌ„d veredictÌ„ suum de suê‘ infra ContentÌ„ pro ipso H. reddant c. Et pd J. A. ê‘ quendaÌ„ C. J. de Consilio suo Demurrer dicÌ„ qd materia ê‘d ê‘ pÌ„fatÌ„ H. C. IurÌ„ pred suê‘ius in Evidentiis ostentÌ„ minus in lege existic ad pro band exitum interius IunctÌ„ pro parte ejusdem H. quodque ipse ad materiam illam in forma pÌ„d in EvidentÌ„ ostentÌ„ necesse necesse non habet nec ê‘ legem terrÌ„ tenetÌ„ respondere hoc paratus est verificare unde pro defectu sufficientÌ„ materÌ„ IurÌ„ pÌ„d in hac parte ostens Idem I. petitÌ„ IudicÌ„ quod IurÌ„ de VeridictÌ„ suo suê‘ Exit pÌ„d reddend exoneretur debitum suum infra specÌ„ una cum dampnÌ„ suis occasione de tentÌ„ debiti illius sibi addiundi cari c. Et pÌ„d H. C. Ex quo ipse sufficÌ„ materÌ„ in Joynde lege ad manutenen exitÌ„ infra ContentÌ„ pro parte ipsius H. IurÌ„ pred suê‘ius in EvidentÌ„ ostens qd ipse ê‘atÌ„ est verificare quaÌ„ quidem materiaÌ„ pÌ„d J. non dedicit nec ad eam aliqualiter respond sed verificationem illam admittere omnino recusat petÌ„ IudicÌ„ qd pred J. ab actione sua pred versus Eum habend precludatur ac qd IurÌ„ pred de VeredictÌ„ suo suê‘ exitÌ„ pred reddend onerentur c. A Precedent of a Demurrer upon the Evidence And now at this day the said Plaintiff and Defendant by their Attornies did appear and the Iury likewise did appear and were sworn c. upon which Sir T. W. Serjeant at Law of Councel with the Plaintiff gave in Evidence so and so and repeat it truely and did require the Iurors to find for the Plaintiff upon which J. C. of Councel with the Defendant saith That the Evidence and Allegations aforesaid alledged were not sufficient in Law to maintain the Issue joyned for the Plaintiff to which the Defendant néedeth not nor by the Laws of the Land is not holden to give any Answer wherefore for default of sufficient Evidence in this behalf the Defendant demands Iudgment that the Iurors aforesaid of giving their Verdict be discharged c. and that the Plaintiff be barr'd from having a Verdict c. Then the Plaintiff joyns and says That he hath given sufficient matter in Evidence to which the Defendant hath given no Answer c. and demands Iudgment and that the Iury be discharged and that the Defendant be Convicted then the Iury may give Damages if Iudgment shall happen to be for the Plaintiff c. A Bill of Exception Memorand That the First day of August Ebor. sc An. 1650. before T. P. and W. Iustices of our said Lord the King for taking of Assizes in the said County assigned in a Plea of Trespass and Ejectment which J. S. in the Court of our said Lord the King before himself by Bill doth Prosecute against E. B. supposing by the said Bill that the aforesaid T. B. c. and recite the substance of the Declaration or what it is c. and the Issue and then what the Evidence to prove the Defendant guilty was c. which here was a Surrender of a Copyhold out of Court c. and that he desired the Iury aforesaid to give their Verdict for the said T. B. of and upon the Premisses and that he likewise desired the Iudges aforesaid that they would inform the Iury aforesaid that the Surrender aforesaid out of Court made was good and effectual in Law and the aforesaid Iustices the aforesaid Surrender of the Land aforesaid with the Appurtenances made out of Court of the Mannour aforesaid in form aforesaid did affirm to the said Iurors was not good in Law by which the said Thomas for that the aforesaid matter to the said Iurors in Evidence shewed doth not appear c. did request of the said Iustices according to the form of the Statute in such case provided this present Bill which doth contain in it the matter aforesaid above by him to the Iurors aforesaid shewed by which the said Clayton's Reports Iustices at the request of the said Thomas this Bill have sealed at D. aforesaid 1. Westm 2. 31. 13 E. 1. When the Iustices will not allow a Bill of Exception upon Prayer if the Party impleaded tender the same unto them in Writing and requires their Seals thereunto they or one of them shall do it 2. If the Exception sealed be not put into the Roll upon Complaint thereof to the King the Iustice shall be sent for and if he cannot deny the Seal the Court shall procéed to Iudgment according to the Exception This Bill of Exception is given by the Statute Westm 2. cap. 31. before which Statute a man might have had a Writ of Error for Error in Law either in redditione Judicii in redditione Executionis or in Processu c. which Error in Law must be apparent in the Record or for Error in sait by alledging matter out of the Record as the death of either party c. before Iudgment But the mischief was if either party did offer any exception praying the Iustices to allow it and the Iustices over-ruling it so as it was never entred of Record this the party could not assign for Error because it neither appeared within the Record nor was any Error in fait but in Law and so the party grieved was without remedy until this Statute was made This Act extendeth to all Courts to all Actions and to both parties and to those who come in their places as to the vouchee c. who comes in loco tenentis It extendeth not only to all Pleas Dilatory and Peremptory c. to Prayers to be received Oier of any Record or Déed and the like but also â—o all Challenges of Iurors and any material Evidence given to any Iury which by the Court is Over-ruled 2 Inst fo 427. All the Iustices ought to Seal the Bill of Exceptions yet if one doth it it is sufficient if all refuse it is a contempt in them all And the party grieved may have a Writ grounded upon this Statute commanding them to put their Seals Juxta formam Statuti hoc sub periculo quod incumbit nullatenus omittatis The party must pray the Iustices to put their Seals but if they deny it they may be
And all these points were resolved by all the Judges of England upon Conference between them in the Case of John Arundel Esq indicted for the death of William Parker Where there may be a special Visne the De Corpore Com. Tryal shall never be de Corpore Comitatus Leon. 1 part 109. If a Venire facias ought to be of one or more Vills in certain in a County and this is awarded de Corpore Comitatus This seems to be aided by the Statute of 21 Jac. of Jeofailes for this comes from the Vills out of which it ought to come and from others in as much as it comes de Copore Comitatus Rolls tit Tryal 618. and many other cases touching this matter But in Ejectment of Land called S. and no place is named where the Land lyes and a Venire is awarded de Corpore Com. this is erroneous and too large because there is a place certain where the Land lyes and yet it is not named in the Nar. as it ought to be Hob. 121. But if the issue be taken upon a title of dignity as whether Chivaler or not this may come de Corpore Comitatus because that the lieu lou c. is not material ib If A. by the name of A. of the County of Hamshire bring a Scire facias upon a Recognisance in Chancery in the Countie of Mid. against B. And the Defendant plead that the Plaintiff is Outlawed by the name of A. of the County of Chester to which the Plaintiff replies that he is not una eadem persona this may be by the body of the County of Mid. where the Writ is brought ibidem In a quare impedit for the Church de Uselbee and the Defendant pleads that there is no such Church the Venue shall not come de Corpore Comitatus but de vicineto de Uselbee for this is a place known and it is intended the Church of Uselbee is within the Ville of Uselbee Hob. 325. IN a prohibition if the parties be at issue Wild. upon a custom de non decimando of wood in the Wild of Sussex the Venire facias shall be de Corpore Com. for the Wild is not such a place whereof the Court may have conusance to be sufficient to have a Jury to come stom this for the Wild is a wood by intendment Hob. 348. In a real Action where the Demandant Heir tryed where the Land lies where not demands Land in one County as Heir to his Father and alledges his Birth in another County if it be denyed that he is Heir it shall not be tryed where the Birth is alledged but where the Land lyeth For there the Law presumes it shall be best known who is Heir But if the Defendant make himself Heir to a Woman for that is the surer and more certain side and the Mother is certain when perhaps the Father is incertain and therefore there it shall be tryed where the Birth is alledged because they have more Cro. 3. part 818. Cro. 2. part 303. certain Conusance than where the Land lyeth And so it is where Bastardy is alledged Bastardy the Tryal shall be in like Case Mutatis mutandis If the man plead the Kings Letters Patents Non concessit where the Land lies and the other party plead non concessit it shall not be tryed where the Letters bear date for they cannot be denyed but where the Land lyeth Every Tryal must come out of the Neighbour-hood of a Castle Mannor Town Visne or Hamlet or place known out of a Castle Mannor Town or Hamlet as some Forests and the like as before Every Plea concerning the person Where the Writ is brought at Common-Law Plaintiff c. shall be tryed where the Writ is brought When the matter alledged extendeth into a place at the Common Law and a place within a Franchise it shall be tryed at the Common-Law Matters done beyond Sea may be tryed in England and therefore a Bond made beyond Sea may be alledged to be Matters done beyond Sea how tryable in England Vide cap. 10. made in any place in England if it bear date in no place But if there be a place as at Burdeaux in France then it shall be alledged to be made in quodam loco vocat Burdeaux in France in Islington in the County of Middlesex and from thence shall come the Jury 1 Inst 261. Lach. 4. and 5. So if the Tenant plead that the Demandant is an Alien born under the Obedience of the French King and out of the Legiance Alien of the King of England the Demandant may reply that he was born at such a place in England within the Kings Legiance and hereupon a Jury of 12. men shall be charged and if they have sufficient Evidence that he was born in France or in any other place out of the Realm then shall they find that he was born out of the Kings Legiance And if they have sufficient Evidence that he was born in England or Ireland or Guernsey or Jersey or elsewhere within the Kings Obedience they shall find that he was born within the Kings Legiance And this hath ever been the pleading and manner of Tryal in that Case So of other things done beyond Sea the adverse party may alledge them to be done at Things done beyond Sea such a place in England from whence the Jury shall come and in a Special Verdict they may find the things done beyond Sea Ib. lib. 7. 26. Lib. 7. 26. So when part of the act is done in England and part out of the Realm that part that is to be performed out of the Realm Part without the Realm and part within if issue be taken thereupon shall be tryed here by 12 men and they shall come out of the place where the Writ or Action is brought Ib. lib. 6. 48. Error for that Iudgment was given by default against the Defendant being an Infant Full age tryed where the Land lies issue was taken that he was of full age And Godfrey moved whether the Tryal should be in Norfolk where the Land was or in Middlesex where the Action was brought And the Court held that it should be tryed in the County where the Land lay and Tanfield said It was so adjudged in the Kings Bench between Throgmorton and Burfind Cro. 3. part 818. Questions of Title of Land except by Where the Land doth ly special order of the Judges in some cases are to be tryed in the County where the Land lies for the Law is that all real and mixt actions as Wast Ejectment c. must be brought in the County where the Land is But Debt Detinue Account Transitory Actions Actions of the Case Battery c. are of their own nature Transitory and yet they ought to be laid and tryed in their proper County where the fact was done unless the Court order the contrary for some Special reasons
and if they are laid out of the proper County dayly practice tells us the Court may alter the venue upon Affidavit of the true place of the fact All Criminal matters are to be tryed Criminal matters where the offence is committed If the Venue arise in two Counties This is called a Joynder of Counties Finch 410. Jury out of two Counties the Jury upon 2. Venire facias shall come from both 6 out of one County and 6. from the other Cro. 3. part 646. but by consent of parties entred upon Record it may be by 5. out of one and 7. from the other as appears Cro. 3. part 471. where in Replevin the Defendant avows for Damage But out of more than two Counties it cannot be made fesant The Plaintiff by his Replication claims common by Prescription in loco quo c. being Broadway in the County of Worcester appurtenant to his Mannor of D. in the County of Gloucester and issue thereupon and 2 Venire facias awarded to the Sheriffs of the several Counties and now 7. of the County of Worcester appeared and 5. of Gloucester And although there ought to have been 6. sworn of each County to try that issue as appears 49 Ed. 3. 1. 31 H. 8. 46. yet by the assent of parties those 12 who appeared by advice of all the Justices were sworn and tryed the issue And it was commanded that this Assent should be entred upon Record for otherwise it would be a strange Precedent In an Assise of Common in Confinio Comitatus and the issue be whether he had Common by prescription in Land in one County appendant to a Mannor in another County this shall be tryed by both Counties The same Law is in Trespass brought in one County which cannot be in confinio upon such an issue the Tryal shall be per ambideux Counties 49 E. 3. 20. See Rolls tit Tryal 599. c. many cases where the Jury shall come from two Counties In an Action upon the Statute of Marlebridge for taking a distress in one County and chasing in another County upon not guilty the Tryal shall be only by the County where the chasing is for this is all the cause of the action 4 H. 6. 4. In Escape upon an Arrest in one County Escape and an Escape in another County upon not guilty this shall be tryed where the Escape is laid for the action is upon the Escape Rolls ib. 602. In an Action of Trover apud Paxton in Covenant in P. to sell at R. tryed at P. Com. Hunt the Defendant pleads a Bargain and Sale apud Royston in Com. Hertford in the Market there whereby he after converted them apud P. in Com. Hunt The Plaintiff saith that he was possessed of those Goods apud P. in Com. Hunt and that J. S. there stole them from him and by Covenant betwixt him and the Defendant at P. in Com. H. he sold them to the Defendant as he hath pleaded The issue was upon the Sale made by Covenant c. And it was tryed in the County of Hunt and found for the Plainâ—ff And it was moved to be a mis-tryal for it ought to have been by a Jury of the County of Hertford or at leastwise by a Jury of both Counties But it was adjudged to be well tryed because the Sale is confessed and the Issue is upon the Covenant alledged in Hertford Cro. 3. part 511. In Debt upon a Bond in London the Usurous Contract in another County Defendant pleaded an Vsurious Contract in the County of Warwick the Plaintiff replyed that the Bond was made upon good consideration Absque hoc that it was made for such Vsurious Contract the Tryal shall be in the County of Warwick for the Bond is confessed and the usury in Warwick is only in question so if the issue A Dures shall be tryed there not where the Action is brought be whether the Deed were made by Dures the Tryal shall be where the Dures and not where the Deed is supposed to be made Cro. 3. part 195. Where issue is taken upon a surrender Surender it shall be tryed where it was alledged to be done and not where the Mannor is of which the Copy-hold is holden ib. fo 260. Br. tit Visne 114. In an Assumpsit laid at London in Warda Ward or Hundred no good Visne de Cheape the Venire was De parochia de Arcubus in Warda de Cheape whereas no Parish was mentioned before in the Count adjudged that the Venire was ill laid in the Count for a Venire facias may be of a Town Parish Mannor or other place known but not of a Hundred or Ward ib. and so it is adjudged ib. Cro. 1 part 165. for the Ward in a City is but as the Hundred in a County The Parish in London is in lieu of a Vill and the Ward of a Hundred Roll. tit Tryal 620 621 622. vide hic apres Where the Visne is laid to be at a City City in an Action brought in a superior Court or within the City though it be both a City and County the Venire facias may be de vicinet Civitatis Lach. 258. Though it hath been held not good but that the Venire facias must be de Civitate leaving out Vicinet as you may read in Stamf. 155. But now the Case in Cro. 2. part 308. and Bulstr 1 part Rolls 622. 623. 129. say that all Venire facias's are awarded de vicinet Civitatis which is intended as well de Civitate it self as de vicinet infra Jurisdictionem So in all inferior Courts Stiles 2. March 125. of the City And so it is de vicinet Civitatis or de vicinet or de Civitate Coventry Eborum Norwich Sarum Bristow Exon and all other Cities which are Counties in themselves In all places besides London no London mention is made of the Parish or Ward Jb. 493. But in London the Parish and Ward is mentioned And therefore it was adjudged Cro. 2. part 150. That it was not good to alledge any thing done in London generally But it must be in what Parish from which a Venire may be But where a thing is laid in a City in alta Warda there and the Venire facias is from the City only it is well because City it shall be intended there be no more Wards in the same City Cro. 3. part 282. In an action against the Hundred upon the Hundred Statute of Winton c. upon the Roll the Venire facias is awarded of Bradley quod est proximum Hundredum and the Venire facias is generally of Bradley This is well because by the Roll it appears that Bradley and the Hundred were all one Roll. tit Tryal 598. If a thing be laid done apud Bristol viz. in Wardae Sanctae Mariae in Warda de Ratliff and the Venire facias is de Warda de Ratliff this is not good ib. 619. But
joyn although they be not nearest nay though 20 Counties be between them Finch French 59. 1 Inst 154. But if it be of a Lease at Ickford of Land in Bury in Suff. the Venue must be of Bury not of Ickford ib. 619 If the issue be taken upon the name or Where the Writ is brought condition of the person this shall be tryed in the County where the Writ is brought 21 E. 4. 8. for this may be well known there Rolls ib. 615. Where the issue is to be tryed upon a point which shall be tryed by two Counties and one cannot joyn with the other this shall be tryed where the Writ is brought 21 E. 4. 8. but for this see before where the Counties cannot joyn In Debt in London against I. S. of D. in Where in other County than where the writ is brought Essex if the Defendant saith that he was at S. in Essex at the time of purchasing the Writ and not at D. this shall be tryed in Essex and not where the Writ is brought for none can know where he dwelt so well as the County of Essex 12 H. 6. 5. Vide many cases in Rolls ib. 605. c. about this matter In an Action of the Case against a Sheriff upon an escape in London and the Arrest laid Where the escape was and not where the Arrest was to be in Southampton adjudged that the Visne shall be where the escape was because that is the ground of the Action and not where the Arrest was Cro. 3. part 271. In Debt upon an Obligation payment was pleaded apud domum mansionalem Rectoriae de Much-Hadam and the Venire facias was de vicineto de Much-Hadham where it ought to have been de vicinet Rectoriae de Much-Hadam but it was adjudged good because Much-hadam is here intended a Vill. ib. 804. So you see that where a thing is alledged to be done at the Capital House * Rectoriae of D. there the Venire shall be of D. For that is intended to be all one with the Vill. Castle But where it is at the Castle of Hertford c. there the Venire facias shall not be de Rolls tit Tryal 621. vicineto de Hertford but de Castro de Hertford for Castrum Hertford is intended a distinct place by it self and so of all Castles Cro. 2. part 239. More 862. A Venire facias may be awarded of a Castle Rolls 618. Where the issue is not parcel of the Mannor Mannor of D. or the Custom of a Mannor is in question the Venire ought to be of the Mannor Hob. 284. Cro. 2. part 327. If the Mannor be laid to be in a Vill the Venire facias Rolls tit Tryal 621. may be of the Mannor in the Vill as de vicineto maneâ—ii de Stansted-Hall in Windham Cro. 2. part 405. More 851. Arundels Case li. 6. 14. The Venue cannot be of a scite of a Mannor Rolls tit Tryal 618. In the Common Bench in Trespass for taking away a Bag of Pepper the Defendant justified as Servant of the Mayor and Commonalty of London for Wharfage due to them by the Custome of London which the Plaintiff refused to pay The Plaintiff replyed that the Custome did not extend to him London because he was a Free-man of the City and ought not to pay Wharfage to which the Defendant re-joyned that the Custom extended to him as well as to strangers upon which issue was joyned Resolved 1. That the issue should be tryed Reâ—order per Pais not by the mouth of the Recorder because he certifies nothing but what the Mayor and Aldermen direct who are concerned in the cause 2. That the Venire facias should not be awarded to the Sheriffs of London nor Middlesex because the Tryals there are by Free-men But it shall be to the County Where the Tryal shall be by the County next adjoyning next adjoyning viz. to the Sheriff of Surry So where any City is concerned the Venire facias shall not be directed to the Officers of the City but to the County next adjoyning Hob. 85. Stiles 137. More 871. vide hic cap. 2. If the issue concern the Mayor and Commonalty of a Town the Array shall be made all of Foreigners 31. Assise 19. vide Rolls tit Tryal 597. So if the issue concern the Mayor and Commonalty c. although they are not parties yet the Venire facias shall be directed to the Sheriff of the next County 15 E. 4. 18. Where a man lends a Horse to another Where a man lends his horse in one place and he is spoiled in another Visne where he is spoiled to till his Land and the Horse dies with excessive Labour the Visne shall be from the place where the excessive labour was and not where the delivery was More 887. vide Hob. 188. Rolls tit Tryal 615. pasch 22 Car. 2. B. R. Horsley versus Potter An action of the case was brought for misusing an Horse in Itinere the Contract was laid at Swafham in Norf. and the riding to Peterborough in Northampton-shire where the Horse died it was tryed in Norf. and the Court seemed that it ought to have been tryed in Northampton-shire where the damage was done and not where the contract was made but it was aided by the Stat. of Jeofailes 17 Car. 2. cap. 17. after Verdict that Statute being then in force Where a promise is laid in one place and Promise in one place and breach in another Visne guided by the issue the breach in another the Visne must be according to the event of the issue whether it be taken upon the promise or breach But if no place be alledged for the breach and issue be taken upon it the Visne must be from the place of the promise which shall be intended right where the contrary appears not see Godbolt 274. Easter 39 Eliz. In the Kings Bench Trespass Assault and Battery en Wilts continuing the Assault in Middlesex and adjudged that the Jurors shall come out of both Counties More 538. The name of a Mannor or Land or Misnomer other local thing shall be tryed where it lies because it is local but the name or addition of a person shall be tryed where the Action is brought because this is transitory Bro. tit Visne 7. lib. 6. 65. In Covenant upon an Indenture of Demise of the Rectory of Stoken Church in the County of Oxford That the Defendant Where the Land lies had good Power and Authority to demise The Indenture was alledged to be made at London and the Venire facias was awarded to the Sheriff of Oxon and this being assigned for Error Iudgement was affirmed and this adjudged to be good More 710. because the Rectory was in Com. Oxon. vide pag. 45. In Debt upon an Obligation in one Where the Land lies and not where the Writ c. County to perform Covenants in a Lease and the Land
English County to cause the Jury to come de propinquiori Visne of his County to the Visne in Wales adjoyning For the Court shall not be ousted of the Plea Fitz. Abridg. tit Visne 8. Jurisdict 24. In an action against a Hundred the Venire facias may come from the next Hundred generally In Trespass if the Defendant plead not guilty to part and to the residue a Plea which causes the Tryal of that to be by a Jury de Prochein Hundred The Venire shall be awarded al Prochein Hundred for both issues because there ought not to be two Venire facias in one action vide Rolls tit Tryal 596. In an Appeal of murder committed in the Cinque Ports although the King be concerned yet because this is betwixt common persons the Venire facias to the next adjoyning Vill. ibidem If the issue be joyned of a matter in Ireland Ireland this shall be tryed by a Jury of the next County in England ib. If the issue be to be tryed by the Venue of Prochein Hundred a Mannor and the Plaintiff suggests that he is Lord of the Hundred in which the Mannor is and that all within the Hundred are within his Distress if the Defendant acknowledge this the Venue shall not be de Corpore Comitatus but of the next Hundred for if it should be de Corpore Comitatus this should be tryed by the Tenants of the Mannor Rolls ib. 667. If the Visne is in some part mis-awarded or Visne mis-awarded in part sued out of more places or fewer than it ought to be so as some place be right named this is aided by the Stat. of Jeofailes which hath ended the differences in many cases reported in our Books concerning this point wherefore I purposely omit them Error for that the Iudgment was given Infamy where the Land lies by default against the Defendant being an Infant upon issue that he was of full age adjudged that the Tryal should be in Norfolk where the Land was and not in Middlesex where the Action was brought Cro. 3. part 818. If the Visne cometh from a wrong place May be out of a wrong place by Consent yet if it be per assensum partium and so entred of Record it shall stand for Omnis Consensus tollit errorem 1 Inst 125. Holmes vers Sanders Hill 22 23 Car. B. R. Error to reverse a Iudgement given in the Kings Bench in Ireland in Debt for Rent brought by the Assignes of a reversion the Plaintiff declared of a Lease of Land in such a Parish in the Suburbs of Dublin on nil debet pleaded the Venire facias was from the said Parish in Civitate Dublin and Iudgement there per Plaintiff it was assign'd for Error because the Land lies in the Suburbs of the City and the Venire facias was from a Parish in the City Per Cur. It is all one for the Suburbs are always within the Franchise of the City as Fleetstreet is within the Suburbs of London but the Strand not though so reputed Note It was adjudged Error in an Inferior Court that the Venire facias was awarded secundum consuetudinem Curiae which ought to be per Curiam Reader vers More Mich. 1650. B. R. CAP. IX Challenges YOu have already seen of what Visne the Jury ought to be The next thing to be considered is concerning Challenges Challenge is a word common as well to the English as to the French and sometimes Challenge signifieth to claim and the Latine word is vendicare sometime in respect of revenge to challenge into the field and then it is called in Latine vindicare or provocare Sometime in respect of partiality or insufficiency to challenge in Court persons returned on a Jury And seeing there is no proper Latine word to signifie this particular kind of challenge they have framed a word anciently written Chalumniare and Columpniare and Calumpniare and now written Calumniare and hath no affinity with the verb Calomnior or Calumnia which is derived of that for that is of a quite other sense signifying a false accuser and in that sense Bracton useth Calumniator to Calumnâ—ator be a false accuser but is derived of the old word Caloir or Chaloir which in one signification is to care for or foresee And for that to challenge Jurors is the mean to care for or foresee that an indifferent Tryal be had it is called Calumniare to challenge that is to except against them that are returned to be Jurors and this is his proper signification But sometimes a Summons Sommonitio is said to be Calumniata and a Count to be challenged but this is improperly And forasmuch as mens Lives Fames Lands and Goods are to be tryed by Jurors it is most necessary that they be Omni exceptione majores and therefore I will handle this matter the more largely A Challenge to Jurors is twofold either Challenge is twofold to the Array or to the Polls to the Array of the principal Pannel and to the Array of the Tales And herein you shall To the Array understand that the Jurors names are ranked in the Pannel one under another which order or ranking the Jury is called the Array and the Verb to Array the Jury and so we say in common speech Battail Array for the order of the Battail Array And this Array we call Arraiamentum and to make the Array Arraiare derived of the French word Arroier so as to challenge the Array of the Pannel is at once to challenge or except against all the persons so Arrayed or Impannelled in respect of the Partiality or default of the Sheriff Coroner or other Officer that made the Return And it is to be known that there is a principal Principal Challenges cause of challenge to the Array a challenge to the favour principal in respect of partiality as first if the Sheriff or other Officers be of kindred or affinity to the Plaintiff or Defendant if the affinity continue Secondly If any one or more of the Jury be returned at the denomination of the party Plaintiff or Defendant the whole Array shall be quashed So it is if the Sheriff return any one that he be more favourable to the one than to the other all the Array shall be quashed Thirdly if the Plaintiff or Defendant have an Action of Battery against the Sheriff or the Sheriff against either party this is a good cause of challenge So if the Plaintiff or Defendant have an action of Debt against the Sheriff but otherwise it is if the Sheriff have an action of Debt against either party or if the Sheriff have parcel of the Land depending upon the same Title or if the Sheriff or his Bayliff which returned the Jury be under the distress of either party or if the Sheriff or his Bayliff be either of Counsel Attorney Officer in fee or of Robes or servant of either party Gossip or Arbitrator in the same
matter and treated thereof And where a subject may challenge the Array for unindifferency there the King being a party may also challenge for the same cause as for Kindred or that he hath part of the Land or the like and where the Array shall be challenged against the King you shall read in our Books In Ejectment the Plaintiff suggesteth that his Lessor the Sheriff and Coroners were Tenants to a Dean and Chapter whose Interest was concerned and prayed the Venire facias to Elisors and had it being confessed by the Defendant and the Court took it a principal challenge v. Hut 24. More 470. Roll. rep 328. Duncomb and Ingleby Trin. 15 Car. 2. B. R. A prayer to Elisors in Tryals at Bar may be at the suit of the Defendant or Plaintiff but in Nisi prius at the prayer of the Plaintiff only and per Cur. it is a principal challenge that the Plaintiffs Lessor is Sheriff or kindred and if the Plaintiff doth not pray c. the Defendant may challenge the Array at the Assises Lord Brookes Case Trin. 1657. B. R. 'T is a good challenge to the Array that the Array is made and returned by 2 Coroners only when there are four in the County and that the Writ is returned by one of the Sheriffs of London only So if a Bayliff return them that are out of his Franchise or if an Array be to be of persons out of a Franchise Guildable and the Bayliff return them for the Sheriff ought to make it and that some of the Pannel were returned by the Bayliff of a Franchise where the whole Pannel is returned as Array by the Sheriff this is a good challenge to the Array for otherwise the parties would lose their challenge to the Array made by the Bayliff Rolls tit Tryal 636. If the Defendant sue the Writ of Hab. By what person Corpus by Proviso at the return the Plaintiff may challenge the Array for Kindred between the Defendant and the Sheriff D. 15 El. 319. 13. D. 15 El. 319. The Array was quashed although the Sheriff was the Naufe in What Consangunity is sufficient descent and the Tenant in the 7. descent from the Ancestor of whom both descended Cousin to the parties Wife although herself no party So if the Wife be dead if issue be alive These are good challenges to the Array Alliance to one party is a good challenge For affinity If the Sheriff be allied at the making At what time of the Pannel and be dead at the challenge yet this is a good challenge 'T is no challenge that the Sheriff became of kin after making the Pannel 'T is no challenge to the Array if all the Jurors be of affinity It may be after a Tales prayed for no challenge can be until the Jury is full If the suggestion of Cousinage to have the Venire facias to the Coroners be denyed and the Venire facias is awarded to the Sheriff the same challenge shall not be allowed to the Array but any other cause may be alledged than what was before denyed Favourably made by the Sheriff or his For favour Bayliff or the Bayliff of a Franchise is a good challenge That the Sheriff is within the Distress of a party or servant to the Plaintiff Of the Robes of the Plaintiff was Arbitrator for a party is procurator and maintainer of a party That the Sheriff purchased part of the Land in question That the Pannel was made by the Bayliff of the Franchise of the other party These are good challenges to the Array 'T is no principal challenge that one party is Tenant or servant to the Sheriff but it is a good challenge for favour It is a good challenge to the Array That Denomination the Sheriff made the Array or put a Juror into the Pannel at the denomination of any of the parties in favour to them or of their servants or of one interessed or of a maintainer or of the Counsel or of a procurator Not if strangers by the Sheriffs leave make the Pannel or it be made at the request of both parties 'T is a good challenge to the Array that For malice one of the parties has brought an action of Debt against the Officer that returns the Pannel or that there is a difference betwixt the Officer and the party that the Officer killed his servant But not that the Officer has Debt against the party for he may demand his Debt without malice The Challenge ought to be quod tempore How and in what manner the Challenge is to be made Pannelli praedict Arraiati the Sheriff was Cousin to the Wife of the Defendant c. not afterwards nor before unless you aver that she was alive or had issue at the making the Pannel If the Challenge be taken for Cousinage it ought to be shewn coment Cousin but in such a challenge to be a Juror 't is not necessary to shew coment Cousin What Counterplea of a Challenge is good and how to be pleaded The mannor and conveiance of the Cousinage alledged in a challenge is not traversable You may traverse the Cousinage prout without modo forma If the Challenge be that the Sheriff was Cousin to the Plaintiff or within his distress 't is no Counterplea to say he is likewise of kin to the Defendant or within his distress also Where the King is party to the issue no Where the King is party challenge shall be to the array for favour 38 Ass 19. Otherwise if the Sheriff be Vadelect of the Kings Crown or such menial servant If it be presented that I. S. hath made a nusance to London and le gents 't is no challenge to the array to say the Sheriff of Middlesex is deputed and removable by the Commonalty of London because this is the suit of the King The King may make his challenge that the Sheriff is within the parties distress although every subject owes greater favour and obedienue to the King by reason of his Allegiance than to any Lord by reason of Tenure In a writ of Right or any other writ a What persons may be impannelled Baron of the Realm may excuse himself In a writ of Right the Inquest ought to be all Knights A Banneret may be impannelled in this writ so may a Serjeant if there be not Chivalers covenable In an attaint upon a recovery by false verdict in an Assise some Knights ought to be returned and if there be not any in the Hundred where the Land lies they shall be returned out of the County By default of the Sheriff as when the array of a Pannel is returned by a Bayliff of a Franchise and the Sheriff return it as of himself this shall be quashed because the party shall lose his challenges But if a Sheriff return a Iury within a Liberty this is good and the Lord of the Franchise is driven to his remedy against him If a
good witness in his own action against the Hundred for he is not bound nay is to be blamed to tell any one what charge he carries with him and if he should not testifie the Law would be often fruitless for want of Evidence or else more Robberies committed by the parties discovering his money In the Case of Brereton and Tatam Mich. 1656. B. R. Glyn. Ch. Just Cited the Lord Chandoi's Case in this Court where one Gates an Executor was produced to prove the Will as a witness to which he as Counsel excepted because of his Executorship It was answered that he had fully administred He replied the Assets might afterward come to his hand but the â—ourt resolved that it would not be presumed to barr his Testimony which was allowed in the principal Case being in â—jâ—ctment It 's no good exception to a Witness that he hath common per cause of Vicinage in the Lands in question because it s but an excuse of Trespass and no interest Clapham's case Mich. 1657. B. R. The same of common of Shacke If Obliâ—ee devises the debt to the Obligor and 〈◊〉 Executors deliver up the Bond in satâ—â—â—â—action of the Legacy which is cancell'd and after the validity of the Will is questioned viz. whether the Testator was compos c. the Obligor is a good witness for the will because by the cancelling of the Bond his debt was discharged But Contr. in case of a Mortgage for though the deed be cancelled if it be no good will he must pay the mony Goodman vers Turbervill Mich. 1657. B. R. An Action was brought by the Corporation of the Weavers of Norwich for a penalty against a Weaver for workign in his Trade in Harvest time contrary to an Ordinance by them made And Atkins Just allowed one of the Corporation to be a witness though one moiety of the penalty was due to the Corporation Lent Assise 1657. In a Tryal at Bar where an Estate for Life is limited to I. S. remainder to the poor of the Parish of Greenwich by Will the Inhabitants of Greenwich were allowed to be witnesses to prove the Will Townsend and Roane Mich. 1658. B. R. An Action of Debt was brought Summer Ass Suff. 1669. by the Town of Ipswich for 50 â— a Fine set on one chosen Common Council Man called their prime Constable for refusing to renounce the Covenant c. And the Town-Clerk though a Freeman was allowed a witness to prove Election Refusal c. and the Fine set which is for necessity for that none other are or ought to be present at those Acts. Rainsford Just Per Hale Ch. Just Norf. Summer Ass 1668. A Freeman of Lynn is not an allowable witness to prove the custom of Foreign bought and Foreign sold in that Town Harwich vers Twels As to Witnesses priviledges One was sub-poena'd ad testificandum and prayed a priviledge from being arrested which was granted and per Cur. it will supersede an Arrest on mean process but not upon an Execution yet the Sheriff in that Case may be committed for his Contempt Hen. Nevil's case Mich. 15 Car. 2. B. R. Detaining of Witnesses Sir Jo. Jackson was Convict on an Information for preventing of Evidence to be given on an Indictment of Perjury against Fenwick and Holt who had been witneâ—â—es for Sir J. J. he arrested some witnesseâ— and gave mony to others and so they wâ—re acquitted He was fined 1000 Marks 1 â—â—â—ths imprisonment behaviour for 12 months Hill 1663. B. R. Proofs to determine matter of Fact and Prooâ—s to be offered to a Judge and Jury are of two sorts First Living as by Witnesses and to a Jury one witness is sufficient And Dead as matters of Record as Letters Patents Fines Recoveries Inrollments c. Writings sealed and delivered as Feoffments Leases Releases c. And without Seal as Court-Rolls Accounts c. And if the Case be between the King and a Prisoner he is first to say what he can himself and then all that can say any thing against him are to be heard upon Oath and then others may be heard for him but not upon Oath And according to this Evidence on both sides or without any Evidence at all the Jury are to give their Verdict according to their knowledge and Oaths Such persons as are infamous as are persons attainted of Felony or of a false Verdict or of a Conspiracy or of Perjury or of Forgery upon the Statute of 5 Eliz. cap. 14. and not upon the Statute of 1 H. 5. 3. and such as have had Iudgment to lose their Ears or stand on the Pillory or Tumbrel or have been stigmatized or branded and Infidels Men not of sound memory or not of discretion or such as are interested in the cause or have benefit are not competent witnesses Co. 1. Inst 6. but we see Jews are daily admitted witnesses An account given to and allowed by the Plenâ— Administravit Ordinary is not good Evidence nor a Pedigree by a Herald of Arms to prove an Pedigree Heir but it must be proved by Deeds Records or Witnesses If the issue be a Recognizance or not a Recognisance Recognizance with a defeasance is good Evidence Plo. 14. So of an Agreement Agreement a special Agreement will prove it Plo. 8. A Licence to alien Land or a pardon for alienation of Land was held by a common Tenure in Caâ—ite presumption to be a good proof that the Land was held in capite A thing which is concluded in the Ecclesiastical Ecclesiastical proceedings Court which doth concern Lands is not to be given in Evidence for the Courts of Common Law are not to be guided by their proceedings Ancient Deeds may be given in Evidence Ancient Deeds although the execution of them cannot be proved He that takes out a Copy of part of a Record Copy of a Record must at least take out so much as concerns the matter in question or else the Court will not permit it to be read If one produce â— Lease made upon an Outlawry Outlawry in Evidence to a Jury to prove a Title he must also produce the Outlawry it self To prove a Feoffment a Deed of Feoffment Feoffment is shewed but no Livery is indorsed if possession has gone with the Deed it is good Evidence Rolls Reports 1. part 132. Vpon Not Guilty to an Information upon Proviso a penal Law a Proviso to excuse him may be given in Evidence Jones Reports 320. If a man prescribe in a non decimando Non decimando generally he cannot give a Bull in Evidence Palmers Reports 38. A Deed with the Seals torn off was admitted Deed. to declare uses Palmers Reports 403 405. Records prove themselves and cannot be Records proved by Witnesses but Copies of them must and are good Evidence and so may any thing done in the County-Court Court-Baron or Hundred-Court c. be proved by Witnesses A
Fine or common Recovery may be Fine given in Evidence though it be not under the great Seal or Seal of the Court and without vouching the Roll of the Recovery and the part indented is the usual Evidence that there is such a Fine though they which saw the Fine are also good Evidence Plow 410. Stiles 22. Depositions in the Ecclesiastical Court Depositions cannot be given in Evidence though parties be dead March 120. A Defendants answer in an English Court is good Evidence against him but not against others Godbolt 326. Where the evidence proves the effect and substance of the issue it is good By order of Court the Depositions taken of a Sick Witness may be given in evidence As upon plene administravit if it be proved Assets that the Executor hath goods of the Testators in his hands he may give in Evidence that he hath paid of his own money for the Testator to the value of those goods Co. Lit. 283. Dyer 2. So if a Lease be pleaded a Lease upon Lease Condition is good Evidence 1 H. 8. 20. because the Genus comprehends the Species So of a Feoffment pleaded a Feoffment upon Condition or a Fine which is a Feoffment of Record is good Evidence 44 E. 3. 39. A special agreement is evidence for an agreement Plo. 8. But if a Feoffment be pleaded in Fee Feoffment upon issue non feoffavit modo forma a Feoffment upon Condition is no Evidence because it doth not answer the issue and wheresoever Evidence is contrary to the issue and doth not maintain it the Evidence is not good 11 H. 4. 3. Feoffments 41. agreement in reversion is no evidence but a Lease and Release is 20 H. 7. 5. If the Indorsment be of a Livery by Attorney the Letter of Attorney must be shewed Vpon an Assumpsit to the Husband an Assumpsit Assumpsit to the Wife and his agreement is good evidence 27 H. 8. 29. upon non assumpsit to a special promise payment is no evidence per 3 Iudges In challenge to the array because made Challenge at the denomination of the Sheriffs Clerk evidence at his Bayliffs denomination is good because favourably made is the substance 38 H. 6. 9. If the issue be in a Suit against an Executor Assets Administrator or Heir Assets in London to prove Assets in another place is sufficient Li. 6. 47. Dyer 271. Accompt pleaded before two Accompt Accompt before one is good Evidence Hob. 55. because the accompt is the substance Vpon the general issue the Defendant may give any thing in Evidence which proves the Plaintiff hath no cause of action What Evidence upon the general issues or which doth intitle the Dâ—fendant to the thing in question But if he hath cause of justification or excuse it must be pleaded wherefore upon non detinet in detinue the Defendant may give in Evidence a gift from the Plaintiff for that proveth that he doth not detain the Plaintiffs goods but he cannot give in Evidence that the goods were pawned to Deâ—inue him for money and that it is not paid but he must plead it 1 Inst 283. For the property is in the pledger Vpon Not guilty in Battery Son assault In Battery demesne is no Evidence for thereby the Battery is confessed Ib. neither is Not Guilty good Evidence upon Son assault demesne Vpon Not Guilty in Trespass Insufficiency Trespass of the Plaintiffs mounds or to justifie for a Rent-Charge Common Licence Son assault demesne or the like is no good Evidence Ib. but to prove a Trespass before or after the day laid in the Declaration is good 1 Inst 283. So upon the Plea Nul Wast fait in an Wast Action of Wast he may give in Evidence any thing that proveth it no Wast as by Tempest by Lightning by Enemies c. But he cannot give in Evidence any justifiable Wast as to repair the House or the like nor a reparation of the Wast before the action brought Ib. Vpon non est factum 'T is no Evidence to Non est factum shew the Bond that was made upon an usurious Contract or that the Sheriffs name is mistaken c. in a Bail-Bond or that the Bond is joynt or several or delivered at another place or that it is void by Statute But it must be pleaded in abatement Ib. Hob. 72. But to prove that the Seal was broken off and put on again or to prove a Rasure of the Deed delivered as an Escrow c. this is good Evidence Li. 5. 119. 11. 27. If 't were done before the action brought but if the Seal was broke off c. by chance after issue joyned the Jury may find it specially To prove the Sealing and delivery of a Deed and not know the party that did it is not good evidence but if he knows the party upon sight of him it is good enough Kelw. 59. Vpon Not Guilty in Trover and Conversion Trover a Demand and denyal of the Goods is good Evidence Plo. 14. li. 10. 57. Cro. 1 part ult pub 495. Hob. 187. Vpon plenè Administravit the Executor Plenè Administravit cannot give a Iudgement in Evidence Kelw. 59. nor payment of Debts by Contract in Debt brought upon an Obligation A Cup pawned and redeemed with the Executors own money is good Evidence but a recovery ought to be pleaded upon nil debet in Debt for Rent That the Lessor entred into part of the Land is no good Evidence Golds 81. But non demisit iâ— 9 H. 7. 3. Vpon Not guilty in an Action upon the Parco fracto Statute de parco fracto That the Plaintiff hath no Park is good Evidence 19 H 8. 9. So upon Not Guilty in Trespass in the Warren Plaintiffs Warren Evidence that he hath no Warren is good 10 H. 6. 17. Kitchin 119. A Shop-book no evidence after a year Shop-books 7 Jac. cap. 12. In Debt for Arrerages of an accompt upon Accompt Nil debet modo forma No accompt is good Evidence 2 H. 6. 26. Vpon Not guilty in Trespass a Lease for years 12 H. 8. 2. or that locus in quo c. is the Freehold Trespass of another 4 E. 3. 45. is good Evidence but upon this he cannot justifie his entry upon the place by a strangers Licence or Command Br. general issue 81. because this is a justification by way of excuse Neither is a Lease at Will good Evidence in this case So upon Not guilty in Trespass for Not guilty in Trespass goods 't is good evidence that the goods were a strangers 9 H. 6. 11. But that they were a strangers and that he as Servant to the stranger or by his commandment took them from the Plaintiff is not good Br. general issue 81. because the Trespass is confessed But that the stranger gave them to the Defendant is good 9 H. 6.
foot by fraud and given in evidence how can a Creditor who sues for a just Debt be prepared to detect this fraud And note in Scire facias against an Execuor on Iudgement per Testator the Defendant pleaded fully administred generally and the Plaintiff demurred specially and Sir William Jones Sollictor general moved to amend the Plea and Hale Ch. Just thought he ought to plead specially how fully administred Bradford vers Hutchinson H. 25 26 Car. 2. B. R. Debt for Rent on a Lease the evidence to prove the Lease was that the Plaintiff leased a House to the Defendant at a Rent but no time mention'd and it was agreed at the same time that the Lessee was not to leave it without half a years warning per Hale Norf. Summer Assise 1668. It 's a Lease at will the leaving on half a years warning is but a Collateral agreement and no part of the demise Ejectment The Plaintiff Counts of a joint Lease made by A. and B. in evidence it appeared that A. B. and C. were Ioynt-tenants that C. Leased to B. and that A. and D. Leased to the Plaintiff by 3. Just against two it 's good 2 Cro. Jurdanes case fo 83. Count of a joynt Lease made by two in evidence it appears they were Tenants in Common by 3 Just against one it 's not good 2 Cro. 166. Mantles Case Count of a Lease by Husband evidence was a Lease by Husband and Wife with Letter of Attorney to make livery and 't is made in name of both by 3 Just against one it 's good for Livery as to the Feme was void 2. Cro. Gardners case Of a Lease made 5. May 10. Regis habendum from Lady-day last past for 21 years Extunc prox sequent In evidence a Lease of 5 May 10. Regis habendum from Lady-day last past for 21 years next following the date of the said Indenture adjudged good and affirmed in Error Hob. 19. Ejectment of a Rectory evidence of the taking of Tythes only and not Entry into the Glebe the Plaintiff was nonsuit Latch 62. Hems and Stroud Ejectment of a Lease to A. of Lands in the possession of three Tenants for years delivered to I. S. as an Escrow with Letter of Attorney to enter into all and then to deliver his Deed c. evidence that the Attorney entred upon one Lessee in name of all and delivered the Deed c. Per Jones Just It 's good enough for where the Freehold is in one his Entry into one Lessee for years in name of all the rest is good Latch 71. Dame Argells case Where one declares on a fictitious Lease to A. for three years and within the same time declares of another fictitious Lease to B. of the same Lands the last is not good For Trespass for the mean profits must be brought in the first Lessees name ut dicitur Ejectment of Tythes a Lease for life of Tythes is good if there be Church or Church-yard to make Livery in resolved in Tryal at Bar Wheeler vers Hanchet Hill 14 15 Car. 2. B. R. v. Jones rep 321 322. Entry and Claym made upon the Land within 5 years after the death of the Baron of the Countess of Peterborough to avoid a fine she being issue in tayle proved by one Witness and allowed at a Tryal at Bar B. R. Mich. 15 Car. 2. Floyd and Pollard Custom of Copyholders in extream is to surrender into one Tenants hands in the presence of credible Witnesses A surrender was made accordingly but presented to be done to another Tenant yet being proved to be done to a Tenant it was holden by Wadh. Wyndham Just to be good and by him a Glove or a Turfe is a Rod to give seisin by Maye's case Norf. Summer Assises 1663. A Will under which Title to Land is made must be shown it self and the Probate is not sufficient Contr. if it were on a Circumstance or as inducement or that the Will remain in Chancery or other Court by special order of such Court. Eden vers Chalk-hill Mich. 13 Car. 2. B. R. Also Inrollment of a Deed which needs no Inrollment is no evidence ib. The issue was fine uncertain or certain 2 years Rent and no more the evidence was of admittances on surrenders uncertain but all under 2 years Rent Per Williams Just you ought to produce fines on descent and fines paid above two years Rent 2 Bulst 32. Allen vers Abraham A lease was made by parol and agreed to be put in Writing and Indentures bespoke but being held for Ten years and no Indentures executed it was ruled for a lease parol Per Barkley Just 13 Car. 1. York Clayton 53. By Just Berkley 1638. York Hedges cont-Clayton 57 a Will under Seal proved examined by the original was allowed good evidence Quaere I think the practice against it A Lease and Release were given in evidence to entitle the Plaintiff and they both were named haec Indentura but were not indented good per Hale Ch. Baron Norf. Summer Assises 1668. Briant vers Trendle After default in Ejectment the Defendant may confess Lease Entry and ouster and may give evidence and have all advantages except Challenges and if the Plaintiff becomes non suit any one for the Defendant may pray it be recorded Per H. Wyndham Just Bucks Lent 68 Dr. Crawle's case Deprivation in spiritual Court for Simony disables from bringing Ejectment because he can make no Lease yet quaere If Mortgagor continues in possession without provision for that purpose in the Deed he is Tenant at Will and if he levies a Fine it 's no disseisin by him continuing in possession still because after the Will determin'd he is Tenant at sufferance Per Hale Ch. Baron Bedford Summer Ass 1669. Declaration on a Lease made 14 Jan. 30. Eliz. evidence of a Lease Sealed 13 Jan. good for if it was a Lease 13. it was a Lease made 14. 4. Leon 14. Feoffments of 40 years standing and possession going accordingly you need not prove Livery it may be intended per Jury Roll. rep 132. The Common Rock on which so many have split is laying the Lease to be à die datus and the Entry the same day which is a disseisin not purged by the Commencement of the Lease for where an interest passes à is exclusive and so the entry the same day is before the Lease was to Commence is a disseisin but in cases of Obligation where no interest passes it is contra quod nota Trespass Count of Trespass done in one acre evidence of Trespass done but in half that acre good 2 Cro. Winkworths Case The Lady Hatton brought Trespass for breaking her Close and taking away her Horse c. against two Defendants they plead Not guilty as to the taking of Her Horse as to the rest they say that the Horse of one of the Defndants was in the Close c. and they took him out doing as little damage as they could quae est
Fine be given in Evidence with five years non clayme c. the fine must be shewed with the Proclamations under Seal and the Chirograph will not serve The confession of a party must be taken whole and not by parts As if to prove a debt it be sworn that the Defendant confessed it but withal he said at the same time That he paid it his confession shall be valid as to the payment as well as that he owed it Per Hale Ch. Just And so is common practice A deed cancelled by practice was allowed to be read in Evidence in action under that Deed the practice being proved Hetly 138. Against a Purchasor bona fide recital in a Deed of money paid is not sufficient nor acquittance for the money unless it be of antient standing and then it shall be presumed The Deed to lead the uses of a Fine sur concessit need not be proved per Testes If a deed of Feoffment be shown but no Livery possession going with the Deed is Evidence to a Jury to find Livery At Guild Hall Trin. 23 Car. 2. Hale Ch. Just cited the Case of Sir Paul Pindar A Levari c. was proved by a recital of it in another Record and Hale and Mainard demurred on the Evidence and adjudged against them for this Cause viz. That it was proved there was such a Record that it was filed that it was taken off the file But by him generally without such proof the evidence is not good because one Record may recite one that never was The Jury are to decide the fact and evidence is not given but to inform them in their consciences of the truth for although no evidence is given of either side yet they may give their verdict of one side or the other 14 H. 7. 29. And therefore although two witnesses are necessary where the tryal is by witnesses as in the Civil Law Yet they are not of necessity where the tryal is by Jury And where witnesses are joyned Office of the Jury with the Jury yet they may be rejected if they will not agree with the twelve and the twelve may give their Verdict The Jury after they are departed from the Barr may return to hear their evidence of any thing they doubt before the Verdict Sur Travers de done in tayle the witnesses Done in Tayle prove That another made the Done this doth not warrant the issue In an action against the Sheriff upon Extortion vers Vic. the Statute of Extortion That he took it for Barretée of one who was acquit is good evidence Possession is an evidence of right and he that hath possession may distrain the Cattle Possession of him that hath no title for the taking is in respect of the possession more than of the title In debt for Rent upon a Lease and nil Debt for Rent debet pleaded ne unques seisie de terre is good evidence otherwise upon the plea of riens arrere or levy per distresse Parson or not Parson in such issue Parson you may give in evidence a resignation although it be in another County and Spiritual In riens passe per le fait Not his Fait deed may be given in evidence In Trespass quare claus fregit with What ought to be proved in evidence abuttals all the abuttals and descriptions must be proved But if the abuttal be laid North c. and it incline North though not directly it is sufficient sic de caeteris Vpon this Issue the account given Plene administravit to the Ordinary shall not be given in evidence nor any respect had to it Will The probat is good for the personal What shall be given in evidence and what is good evidence estate but not to prove a Will in writing of Land by the Statute Recital of other Grants by Letters Patents Recital in Letters Patents in Letters Patents are some evidence but not fit to be allowed without shewing the former Letters Patents or a copy But the Jury may find them Surmise in a Prohibition The proof of this surmise in any Court of Record shall not be given in evidence in another action upon the same custome because the Defendant in the prohibition cannot cross examine Depositions Depositions in the Court Christian in the Court of the Councel of York touching the title of Land of which they have not conusance or in another Suit against him who claimeth not under those parties by the Commissioners upon a Commission of Bankrupt because the party could not cross examine shall not be allowed in evidence But a sentence given in the spiritual Court touching Tithes may be given in Evidence in an Action at Common-Law for this is a judicial act After evidence given and the Jury ready Former Tryal to give their Verdict and then the Atturney General will not proceed but draws a Juror and brings another information none of the former Jurors shall be admitted to give in evidence that the Jury were ready to give their Verdict against the King in the first information for this ought not to be discovered for so no benefit would accrue to the King by his Prerogative to draw a Juror But this may be given in evidence in another What may be given in evidence upon a special Issue action where the King is not concerned In debt for rent upon non demisit that Debt for rent the lessor riens avoit in the land at the time of the demise may be given in evidence Vpon an Issue of Common appendant c. Common common per cause de vicinage cannot be given in evidence If the Defendant plead son assault demesne Son Assaule demesne in Battery in Battery and the Plaintiff reply de injuria sua propria absque tali causa And so issue is joyned if there was a battery at another day than what the Plaintiff and Defendent have assigned upon the Plaintiff and another upon the Defendant by the Plaintiff The Verdict ought to be for the Defendant for if the Defendant prove any assault made upon him by the Plaintiff this ought to be found for him although it was at another day than what he hath alledged for the day is not material But upon such speciall justification the Defendant hath liberty to prove his Plea at any time and the Plaintiff might have made a new assignment at another time for peradventure there might be several trespasses at several times to which the Defendant may have several Pleas and therefore if such manner of pleading should not be allowed and such evidence the Defendant could not tell how to help himself nor could know for what Trespass the action is brought Vide devant hic appres cap. 13. If the Issue be whether the Kings Surrender Tenant by Letters surrendred to the King or not the accepting of new Letters Patents which is a surrender in Law is good
if a Release be pleaded in a Foreign County and tryed there for the Plaintiff there also shall damages be assessed by the same Iury. For where the 21 Ass 14. principal is tryed there also shall the Accessary and incidents be inquired of I need use no other instances to illustrate this than the case abovesaid They may find a Condition to defeat a What things the Jury may find Freehold of Land although it be not pleaded but of things in grant they must also find the Déed of the Condition Vpon Traverse of a Lease Modo forma the Iury may find a Lease of another date Modo forma although the date be mistaken in the Pleading but not a Lease made by another than from whom was pleaded for this is out of the issue in matter and form In an Assise of Rent the Iury may find Rent that the Rent was granted with an Atturnment although no specialty be shewed A Fine or Recovery may be found by the Matter of Record Iury without shewing of it under Seal The Iury cannot find against what is admitted by the Record They may find a Divorce which is a Record Divorce in the Spiritual Court but not by our Law Attainder of Felony not pleaded cannot be Attainder found unless Sub pede sigilli 26 Ass 2. The Iury is not to inquire of this which is agréed by the parties As in Dower if the Tenant says he has Dower been always ready to render Dower and the issue be if the Husband dyed seised the Iury is not to inquire if the Estate was dowaable for this is confessed If the Defendant doth not deny the Wast Wast but Pleads another matter scilicet nul tiel vill lou c. the Iury is not to inquire of the Wast but give damages although no Wast be made In Debt upon a Bond with a Condition Award to perform an Award and the Defendant Plead Nullum fecit Arbitrium and the Plaintiff reply fecit Arbitrium and sets it forth and the Defendant rejoyn Nul tiel award the Iury cannot find any matter dehors to make the Award void in Law which doth not appear within the Award pleaded As that the release awarded would discharge the Bond of the Submission for nothing is in issue but whether such an Award was made in fâ—it as is alledged neither could this matter be alledged by any Rejoynder for it would have béen a departure from the Plea and â— Iury cannot find that which would have béen a departure because out of their issue But in this Case if the Defendant would have took advantage of it he ought to have Pleaded all this matter in his Barr and not have said Nullum fecit Arbitrium for 't is a departure in the Rejoynder to acknowledge an Award which was denyed in the Plea In Debt for 20 s. and the Issue be solvit How the Jury ought to find their Verdict and what shall be intended ad diem and the Verdict be quod debet the 20 s. this is not good because it is not direct but by Argument In Debt upon an Obligation if the Defendant say That he is a Lay-man not lettered and 't was read as an Acquittance Nient lettered Et issint nient son fait if the Iury find he knew what he did and that it was a Bond and he was willing to be bound this is no good Verdict because they ought precisely to find if it was his Déed or not If the Issue be whether where a Copyhold is granted to thrée for the lives of two if he which dye seised c. ought by Custom to Custom pay a Heriot or not and the Iury find that there was never any such Estate granted in the Mannor this is not good for the reasons aforesaid So if the Issue be if by Custom an Estate tayle may be granted and the Iurâ— find that it may be granted in Fée which is greater yet 't is not good In Trespass for taking and cutting his Trespass Leather if the Defendant justifie as a Searcher and cut it for the better search More scrutatorum without any other damage and the Plaintiff reply De injuria sua propria Absque hoc that he cut it More scrutatorum upon which Traverse issue is joyned and the Iury find that the Defendant cut it as the Plaintiff has alledged this is no good Verdict because 't is not any answer to the issue but by Argument In Trespass and Battery in A. to find Battery not guilty in A. is not good for it ought to be generally not guilty Vpon this Plea if the Plaintiff reply Riens per Descent that he hath divers Lands in D. per descent and the Iury find he had divers Lands by descent this is good without finding what for 't is Incertain not material in regard upon this false Plea a general Iudgment is to be without having respect to the Assets Of 5 Acres if they find the Defendant Ejectment guilty in 8 pieces de terre parcel tenementorum predict 't is a void Verdict because uncertain and no Execution can be made of peices In case upon non Assumpsit Pleaded if Verdict Special the Iury find that the Defendant non Assumpsit yet if two Witnesses say true then we find that he did Assume The first shall stand for the Defendant and the last words are void and Surplusage shall not vitiate Surplusage If upon a Lease of 20 Acres and the Defendant Ejectment plead Non dimisit and the Iury find quod dimisit 10 Acres tantum and the Conclusion of the Verdict is Et si super totam materiam Curiae videbitur quod Defendant dimisit 20 Acres then they find for the Plaintiff and if not then for the Defendant this is repugnant and so the Verdict is void in all To Assess Damages incertainly is void Certain As to say we Assess 40 l. if we must by Law if not then but 3 l. this is void Indelitatus assumpsit to Assess Damages occasione debiti predicti is good although it ought to be occasione non performationis c. In an Information upon the Statute Information 39 El. ca. 11. for Dying with Logwood by which he lost 20 l. for every Offence upon Not guilty if the Iury find him Guilty for using this against the Statute for 40 days by which he lost this is not good because he forfeits 20 l. for every time and the number of times do not appear If the Iury find the words in the Will and yet do not find the Will the Verdict is not good If they first find the Special Matter and then find the Issue generally the Special Matter is hereby waved If the Iury find that J. S. was seised in Where a Special Verdict shall be good by Intendment Fée and Devised the Land to J. D. although they do not find
that the Land was held in Socage yet this is good for this shall be intended this being a Collateral thing and this being the most common Tenure If they find that he was seised and made his Will in haec verba c. although they Will. do not find that he Devised the Land as in the former yet this is good by intendment But if a thing is left out and cannot be intended the Verdict is not good If the Issue be whether the Sheriff took J. S. and kept him in Prison in Execution for certain Debt and Damages by force of a Cap. ad Sa. and the Iury find that he took him by force of an alias Cap. ad Sa c. although they do not find that he kept him in Execution for the Debt and Damages aforesaid according to the Issue yet this is a good Special Verdict for it shall be intended for the Consequence is necessary from this which is found for he could not take him but that he must be in Execution Vide several instances of this Roll. tit Tryal 697 c. If the Iury find that J. S. was seised in Fée and made his Will in haec verba and that he afterwards died although they do not find that he died seised yet it shall be Will. intended that he died seised and so good If they find that A. did Bargain and Bargain and Sale Sell c. although they do not find any consideration yet this shall be intended So if they find that such persons Authorizati Letters Patents virtute literarum patentium dominae Elizabethae c. and do not find that the Letters Patents were under the Great Seal yet this shall be intended Verdicts of Lay-men shall be taken according to their intent and néed not so precise a form as in Pleadings lib. 4. 65. Hob. 76. Therefore if the Iury find a Recognizance in nature of a Statute Staple in this manner That the Conusor came before R. O. Recorder of London and T. O. Maior of the Staple Et recognovit se debere to B. 200 l. and do not say Secundum formam statuti c. nor Prescriptum Obligatorium c. although the Statute of 23 H. 8. provide That it shall be by Bill Obligatory sealed with three seals and here it doth not appear that there was any Bond or Seal nor that it was according to the Statute yet these things shall be intended they having found a Recognizance before the Maior and Recorder A Special Verdict may be amended by Notes the Notes If the Iury find a Special Verdict and Where a special Conclusion of a special Verdict shall aid the Imperfections of it refer the Law upon that special Matter to the Court although they do not find any title for the Defendant which is a Collateral thing to the point which they refer to the Court yet the Verdict is good enough for all other things shall be intended except this which is referred to the Court lib. 5. 97. In Ejectment If the Plaintiff declare upon a Lease made by A. and the Iury find a Special Verdict and Matter in Law upon a power of Revocation of Vses by an Indenture and limitation of new Vses and then a Lease for years made to the Plaintiff by the Lessor in the Declaration and another in which there is an apparent Variance but they conclude the Verdict and refer to the Court whether the grant of a new Estate found in the Verdict be a revocation of the first Indenture or not The special Conclusion shall aid the Verdict so that the Court cannot take notice of the variance betwéen the Lease in the Declaration and Verdict because the doubt touching the Revocation is only referred to the Court. And although they refer to the Court whether this be a Revocation of the first Indenture and not of the former Vses and limitation of new Vses as it ought to be yet in a Verdict this is good for their intention appears So Note a difference between a special Conclusion and Reference to the Court and a general Conclusion and Reference to the Court Vide hic apres In Debt for 40 s. for a Horse sold and For whom the Verdict shall be said to be found the Iury find 40 s. Debt for two Horses sold this is found against the Plaintiff for this is not the same Contract So in Debt for 20 l. if the Iury find 40 l. Debt this is against the Plaintiff In Debt for 20 l. for Wood sold and the Iury find the Bargain was for 20 Marks the Plaintiff shall not have Iudgment for this Variance So in Debt for Rent upon a Demise of two Acres and the Iury find it upon the Demise of one Acre the Plaintiff shall not have Iudgment But in Debt for 24 l. 8 s. received for the Plaintiffs use if the Iury fiâ—â— the Defendant owes 24 l. but not the 8 s. the Plaintiff shall have Iudgment for perhaps he had paid the 8 s. In an Action upon the Case against A. if the Plaintiff declares That by Custom c. amongst Merchants c. If two are found in Arrearages upon Accompt and they assume to pay this at certain Days that any one of them may be charged for the whole by himself and then shews the Accompt of A. and B. who were found in Arrear in so much c. and promised to pay this at certain days but paid it not and now he brings his Action against A. although upon non Assumpsit pleaded it be found that the days of payment are mistaken yet the days being past the Action lyes because the Law makes the Duty upon the Accompt for which after the days an Action lyes Where all is to be given in Damages Damages the Iury are Chancellors and may give so much as the Case requires in Equity In Detinue of a Bond of 100 l. if the Detinue Iury find that he received a Bond of a greater or less Sum the Verdict is for the Defendant So in a promise to do two things if the Promise Iury find but one of them 't is for the Defendant Otherwise in Ejectment upon a Demise Ejectment of 10 Acres if the Iury find a Demise of less the Plaintiff shall have Iudgment If the Issue be upon a Prescription for Prescription Common belonging to a Messuage and 200 Acres of Land 50 of Meadow and 50 of Pastuâ—e if the Iury find Common belonging to the House 20 Acres of Meadow and 20 of Pasture in two of the Vills and not in the rest the Prescription is not found If part of the Trespass or wrong be found Trespass Case 't is sufficient in Trespass or an Action of the Case upon a Tort as by a Commoner for putting and depasturing Cattel in the Common If the Issue be whether all the Lands in Audita Quaerela Execution were the Estate of the Father in Tail or in
sufficien in lege existunt tam ad manutenend proband exit pred pro parte dicti A. F. superius ad patriam junct quam ad excludend Domin Regem de aliqua forisfactura bonor pred habend Ad quas pred Attorn Domini Regis pro ipso Domino Rege minus sufficienter respondit nec aliquod pro ipso Rege allegavit unde idem A. pet judicium ac quod pred bona in dicta informatione spec ei reliberentur quodque ipse quoad premissa ab hac Curia dimittatur Ideo ad judicium Note In this Case the agreement according to the Statute was put in Issue generally and yet the special agreement maintained the Issue And wheresoever the Evidence doâ—h not warrant prove Regula and maintain the vâ—ny same thing that is in Issue that Evidence is defective and may be Demurred upon Upon non est factum to a Bond dated at York It Non â—st factum was said in this case that to prove the Bond made in another place doth not prove the Bond nor Warrant the Issue because the delivery is intended to be where the Dare is but the Witnesses prove the contrary and so the Issue is not proved But surely if this be found the Plaintiff shall have Judgment as well as upon a Bond delivered before the date 31 H. 6. Plo. 7. Rolls 677. But infancy or made by Dures cannot be given in evidence upon non est factum lib. 5. Whelpdales Case 119. because thereby the Bond is not void but only voidable Otherwise of the Bond of a Feme Covert or Monk for there the Bond is void and so non est factum and so of a Bond made to a Feme Covert and the Husband disagree to it or by Husband and Feme Non est factum of the Wife In an Assise if the Tenant plead Nul tort nul disseisin he cannot give in evidence a release after the disseisin but a release before the Disseisin he may for Release then there is no Disseisin upon the matter In a Writ of Right if the Tenant joyn the Mise Warranty upon the meer Right he cannot give in evidence a Collateral Warranty for he hath not any right by it and therefore it ought to have been pleaded 1. Inst 283. Regularly whatsoever is done by force of a Warrant or Authority ought to be pleaded Regula But Note in all Cases where one cannot have advantage of the special matter by way of Plea there he may have advantage of it in evidence as for example The rule of Law is That one cannot justifie the Death or Killing of a man and therefore if one kill another in his own defence he cannot plead this specially but he may give it in evidence and so in defence of his House against Thieves and Robbers c. By the Statute 23 H. 8. cap. 5. any thing done by Sewers the authority of the Commission of Sewers may be given in evidence upon the general Issue After taking the General Issue the Defendant cannot give in evidence any thing that goes in discharge Regula of the Action as in Debt upon nil Debet he cannot give in evidence a Release nor a grant to cut Trees Release to repair upon nul wast fait nor making of a Ditch to amend the Meadow but that he only lopped the Wast Trees he may if wast be Assigned in succidendo Arbores c. Neither if a Statute was made that all Statute Tenants for life should be dispunishable of wast could he give in evidence this Statute 28 H. 8. Dyer 28. for the discharge ought to be pleaded because it admits a Cause of Action without it In Debt against Executors and Assets inter marus Assets in Issue 'T is good evidence that they sold Land by the Will of the Testator c. and that they had the money And so that they recovered Damages in Trespass for goods taken in the life of the Testator c. 3 H. 6. 3. In an Issue upon Villenage regardant to a Mannor Villenage a Villain in gross is no evidence Dyer 48. In wast by the Grantee of a Reversion by Montague Attornment and Fitz. The Lessee may plead that he in reversion ne grant a pas per le fait and give in evidence that he never attorned or he may Traverse the Attornment at his election Dyer 31. In Trespass Quare clausum fregit the Defendant Trespass says that locus in quo c. is 6 Acres in D. which is his Freehold the Plaintiff replies that it is his Freehold and not the Defendants The Defendant cannot give in evidence other 6. Acres in D. which are his Freehold because the plea shall be intended to refer to the 6 Acres of the Plaintiffs Dyer 23. In Rescous by the Lord upon not guilty the Rescous Defendant shall not give in evidence that he doth not hold by Vavasour and Bryan and so if he said nothing is behind in avowry he shall not give in evidence that he doth not hold of him T. 9 H. 7. 3. Avowry In Assise Feoffment pleaded the Plaintiff said he Feoffment did not enfeoff modo forma upon the Deed and Letter of Attorney to Infeoff upon condition found if the Attorny made it without condition this well proves the Issue for the Plaintiff 13 E. 4. 4. If one plead a Feoffment of a Jointment to his Companion or of a Feme Covert the other may say ne enfeoffa pas and give the matter in evidence and the Court shall instruct the Jury of the Law 18 E. 4. 29. Upon the general Issue any thing may be given in evidence Regula which proves the Plaintiff had no cause of Action Trespass by the Warden of the Fleet upon not Trespass Guilty you may give in evidence that he is not Warden 4 E. 4. 7. So in Trespass of a House that he had no house there or the Freehold of another and not of the Plaintiff is good evidence upon not Guilty but in Trespass of Goods 't is no good Plea to say the property was in another although it is in a Replevin and therefore it seems to be no good evidence in Trespass because possession maintains the Action against all but the owner but that the property was in a stranger and he gave them to the Defendant is good See before cap. Evidence 27 H. 8. 25. But in Trover Trover that they were not the Goods of the Plaintiff is good evidence 5 H. 7. 3. Cessavit 〈◊〉 Count that of diverse Lands held by Cessavit entire service upon non tenuit modo forma held by several services is good evidence for he had no such cause of Action 10 H. 7. 24. Upon the general Issue for the Defendant by evidence to Regula convey to himself the same Interest and Title â— good evidence As in Trespass of Goshauks Not Guilty