by my acceptance of the rent I have assented to his entry Distress and Distringas The seising of a stray is not a Distress of it for he that doth seise it claims a property in it 21. Car. B. r. And no man can Distrain that which is his own for to Distrain is but to take one thing from another and to put it into the custody of the Law as a pledge for another thing which is due to him that doth Distrain from him that is distrained An amercement lies not against a Sheriff out of his Office for a misdemeanour done by him whilst he was in his Office but a Distringas nuper Vicecomiti lies against him for it Pasc 24. Car. B. r. The Writ of Venire facias for the Sheriff to summon a Jury is retornable by him into the Court and upon the retorne made of it by him there issues out of the Court another Writ called a Distringas Juratores to cause the Jury to appear in Court at the tryal of the Cause if the tryal be at the Barr in this Court or at the Assises in the County where the Action lies if the tryal be to be there Mich. 24. Car. B. r. The Writ of Distringas Jurators ought to be delivered unto the Sheriff so timely that he may warn the Jury to appear four dayes before the Writ is retornable if the Jurors live within fourty miles of the place of tryal and eight dayes if they live further off 13. May. 1651. B. S. Discontinuance A Discontinuance in process is helped if there follow a verdict in the cause and the party do also appear upon the verdict 21. Car. B. r. Q. Whether every discontinuance of process may be thus helped Where a Vouchee may be essoigned and the essoigne is not adjourned this is a Discontinuance but where it is not necessary the vouchee should be essoigned there the want of adjournment of the essoigne makes no Discontinuance Hill 22. Car. B. r. An appeal may as well be Discontinued by the defect of the process or proceeding in it as it may be by insufficiency of the original Writ Hill 22. Car. B. r. The Plaintiff cannot Discontinue his Action after a generall verdict found against him nor after a special verdict is found upon matter of Law arising upon the evidence given at the tryal in the cause 22. Car. B. r. The Plaintiff may Discontinue his Action by the leave of the Court after he hath joyned in demurrer with the Defendant paying Costs to the Defendant if the demurrer was only upon matter of form in the pleading But if the demurrer was as well upon matter of substance as upon matter of form there he cannot Discontinue his Action by leave of the Court Mich. 24. Car. B. r. Except the Defendant will consent unto it A discontinuance of an Action or Suit is not a perfect Discontinuance untill it be entred upon the Roll but if this Discontinuance be to be pleaded it is not necessary to plead the entry of it Trin. 23. Car. B. r. Where a Demurrer is a generall Demurrer whereas it ought to have been a speciall Demurrer this is a Discontinuance and there can be no judgment given in the case upon such a Demurrer Hill 23. Car. B. r. After a Demurrer upon an Arbitration pleaded it is not usual to Discontinue the Action Mich 24 Car. B. r. Demand Where there is a Demand of a thing to be made there the Demand must be a Legal Demand that is it must be made in such manner as the Law requires otherwise he that made the Demand can take no advantage in Law upon this Demand Hill 21. Car. B. r. If there be no place expressed in a Deed where a rent for Land or a nomine poenae or any other thing demandable shall be made the Law doth then direct that the Demand shall be made upon the Land c. out of which the rent or nomine poenae or other thing demandable do issue or go out of Hill 21. Car. B. r. A Demand of a rent reserved upon a Lease made of a Messuage with Lands belonging to it ought to be made at the Messuage because the Messuage is the most eminent part and place of the thing let and most notorious for the Lessee to take the best notice of the Demand 21. Car. B. r. For the Lessee shall be presumed to be more conversant there then in any other place Yet if the Demand were made upon any part of the Land and the Lessor can prove that the Lessee was there and took notice of it I suppose it is a good Demand but if he were not there when the Demand was made Q. whethâ—r it be a good Demand The parties bringing of an Action of Debt for monies due upon an Obligation and the taking of a distress for rent by him unto whom the rent is due is a good Demand in Law of the Debt due by the Obligation and of the rent Trin. 22. Car. B. R. A Demand in a precipe to recover Lands ought to be more certain than a Demand in a Writ of Dowr 18. Nov. 1650. B. S. For Dowr is one of the things favoured in Law Declaration A Declaration may be against one that is in custody of the Marshall of this Court upon an information although he do not appear to an Action Hill 21. Car. B. R. The Plaintiff is not compellable to file his Declararation yet if it be not filed and afterwards judgment is given in the Cause the judgment is erroneous for want of a Declaration Hill 21. Car. B. R. For before it is filed it is not upon record and so there is no Declaration to warrant the judgment If the Plaintiffs Attorney do file a Declaration against the Defendant in the Kings Bench Office the Defendant is bound to take notice of the Declaration at his peril 21. Car. B. r. A Declaration ought not to vary or differ from the Plaint that is the Cause which the Plaintiff doth express in his Writ why he brings his Writ 21. Car. B. r. For the Writ is the ground of the Declaration and that which warrants it If the Plaintiff declare against the Defendant upon a corrupt Contract made against the Statute of 21. Jac. made against Usury he must express in the Declaration that the Defendant corrupte agreavit or else he must shew that the Contract was made pro usura contrary to the Statute 21. Car. B. r. For he must pursue the words of the Statute One may not Declare against one that is in the Kings Bench prison that is not either in custodia Mareschalli or that hath not filed his bail or that is not a priviledged person in this Court 21. Car. B. r. If one be in custody of the Marescall of this Court at the suit of J. S or have put in bail in this Court to the Action of J. S any other person may put in a Declaration against him the same Terme he
was made but if an Action of Debt be brought against an Administrator for Rent due for Lands left by the Plaintiff to the Intestate but growing due in the time of the Administrator viz. since the Letters of Administration were granted unto him the Action must be brought in the County where the Lands do lye for which the Rent is due Mich. 22. Car. B. r. An indebitatus assumpsit generality is not good to create a Debt but there must something else be made appear to the Court to make a Debt to be due to the party that brings an Action of Debt or else the Action will not lye Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For else to declare upon an indebitatus assumpsit is no more then if the parties declared upon a nudum pactum An Action of Debt doth lye for a Councellor or for an Atturney for their Fees against the party that retained them Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Q. Whether it lie for a Councellor for his Fee is honorarium Quiddam and not mercenarium a Gratuity rather then Wages or a Salary By Rolle Chief Justice An Action of Debt doth lie upon a perfect Contract in Law betwixt the parties and not an Action upon the Case 22. Car. B. r. For generally where the Law directs a certain Action there an Action upon the Case is not to be brought An Action of Debt brought against an Executor for Rent grown due in the time of the Executor ought to be brought in the detinet and debet Hill 22. Car. B. r. So then said to be adjudged in Royton and Mees Case But if the Action be brought for Rent due in the life of the Testator the Action ought to be brought in the detinet onely Where a certain sum of mony is to be paid upon an Obligation at several dayes of payment expressed in the Condition of the Obligation though the mony be not paid accordingly yet an Action of Debt cannot be brought for any part of this money untill all the days of payment expressed in the Obligation be past Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Because the penalty of the Obligation is to be recovered which is not wholly due untill the whole Condition be broken which is not so untill the party fail in the last day of payment If one deliver necessaries to an Infant viz. meat drink or cloaths and he promise to pay for them an Action of Debt will lye against the Infant upon this promise if he perform it not But if the party come to an account with the Infant forwhat is due unto him from the Infant and thereby doth state the sum due unto him an Action of Debt doth not lye against the Infant for the moneys stated to be due unto the party upon this account Trin. 24. Car. B. r. If a woman sole be indebted and then take a husband the Debt is now thereby become the Debt of the husband and of the wife that is to say the wives proper Debt and the husbands Debt in the right of his wife and the wife ought to be sued for this Debt together with her husband and if the husband dye whereby the Action is abated yet the wife may be sued again for this Debt Trin. 24. Car. B. r. A Judgement was Reversed in this Court by a Writ of Error because it was given to recover a Legacy Trin. 24. Car. B. r. For then a Legacy was not recoverable at the Common Law but in the Eclesiastical Court or in the Chancery But now by a late Statute an Action lies for a Legacy at the Common Law See the Statute An Action of Debt doth not lie upon a Judgement given in this Court after the Record thereof is removed by a Writ of Error out of this Court into the Exchequer Chamber Trin. 23. Car. B. r. An Action of Debt doth not lie against an Executor which is grounded upon a simple contract made by the Testator Hill 1649. Jan. 31. B. r. Q. And Action of Debt doth lie against a Goaler for suffering a prisoner in Execution to escape by the party at whose Suit the Prisoner was committed in Execution Trin. 1650. B. r. 15. Junii One may bring an Action of Debt for Rent in what County he pleaseth 9. Nov. 1650. B. r. Because it sounds not in the realty Q. If a judgement be given for the Plaintiff in an Action of Debt in the Common Pleas and afterwards the transcript of the Record is removed into this Court by a Writ of Error yet the Plaintiff for whom the Judgement was there given may bring an Action of Debt there upon that Judgement but if the Judgement be Reversed in this Court upon the Writ of Error and after the party proceed in the Common Pleas in his Action of Debt the party against whom he thus proceeds may bring his Audita Querela to be relieved against this second Action 3. Feb. 1650. B. S. For by the reversal of the Judgement the ground of the second Action is destroyed One may joyn two Debts due upon two severall Obligations from the same party in one Action of Debt 6. Feb. 1650. B. S. And declare in one Declaration upon the several Obligations If one do deliver goods to I. S. to my use if the party to whom they were delivered do refuse to deliver them unto me I may have either an Action of Debt or an Action of Accompt for them against him to whom there were delivered at my election 22. Ap. 1651. B. S. Deeds Such construction ought to be made of a Deed that it may agree with the intent of the parties to the Deed if their intent do not contradict the Rule of Law Hill 22. Car. B. r. A Deed of Indenture made betwixt two ought to be Sealed and Delivered by both parties to the Indentures otherwise it cannot be said to be a Deed indented Trin. 23. Car. B. r. If all the parts of a Deed may by Law stand together no one part of that Deed shall be so interpreted as to make either the whole Deed or any part of it to be voide Pasc 24. Car. B. r. A Deed cannot be delivered as an escrew to the party himself who is to take by the Deed. Trin. 24. Car. B. r 1650. Trin. B. S. For the delivery of it makes it the parties Deed. If a Deed do say This Indenture made whereas the Deed is not endented yet it may be a good Deed for it may work as a Deed Poll though it cannot work as an Indenture If it do not appear by the Fabrick of a Deed that Lands do pass by the Deed by way of Feoffment yet the Land may pass by it by way of use if there be a consideration which is sufficient in Law to raise a use expressed in the Deed. Ejectment IF one Seal a Lease of Ejectment to try a title of of Land it is not necessary to give notice of the sealing of this Lease unto him whose title is concerned but it is sufficient
in the possession of one of the Tenants that holds parcel of these Lands This is a good Lease to try the title of all the Lands But if the Freehold of the Lands in question be not an entire Freehold such a Lease sealed upon parcel of the Lands in question is not good to try the title of all the Lands Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For several Freeholds must have several Leases to try them because they are the Right and Titles of several persons or by several Titles A Lease for years although it be a very long Lease cannot be entailed For the nature of a Chattel cannot be turned into an Inheritance Hill 23. Car. B. r. Which would be if such a Lease which is but a Chattel might be entailed for an Estate intayl is an Estate of Inheritance A Lessee for years is not bound to repair the house let unto him which is burned by accident if there be not a special Covenant in the Lease that he shall leave the house in good repair at the end of the term But if the house be burned by the negligence of the Lessee he shall repair it although there be no such Covenant in the Lease Pasc 24. Car. B. r. For by the Lessees Covenant it shall be intended that he took notice of what accidents might happen and his Covenant shall be taken generally and without exception and strongest against himself In a Lease for years by Indenture the term is not certain before the habendum tenendum in the Lease Term. Trin. 24. Car. B. r. For though it do appear before the habendum tenendum that the Lands in the Lease mentioned are demised unto the Lessee yet it doth not appear for how many years they are demised nor when the Lease is to begin nor when to end until it is declared in the habendum One may raise an Estate for life in Lands to another by way of use viz. by covenanting with A. B. to stand seised to the use of J. S. for and during the natural life of J. S. without Livery and Seisin Mich. 24. Car. B. r. For the Estate is executed in the cestuy que use by the Statute of Vses of 32. H. 8. without Livery If one be in Possession of Lands of another and hath usually paid a Rent unto him for these Lands although it cannot be expresly proved that the Lands were demised at will to him that is thus in possession of the Lands that is that he should hold them as long as both parties should please yet this holding of the Lands shall be interpreted to be by a Lease at will Mich. 1650. B. S. For it shall be presumed that he in possession doth hold the Lands and that the owner of the Lands did receive the Rent for those Lands upon some Contract made between the parties for holding the Lands for some term and for paying of such a rent for them and a less time cannot be supposed then to hold them at will If one make a Lease for years and after the Lessor enters upon the Lands let before the term is expired or determined and doth make a Lease of these Lands to another this second Lease is a good Lease untill the first Lessee doth re-enter 2. Maii. Pasc 1650. B. S. And then the first Lease is revived Although a Lessee for years do lose his Indenture of Demise of the Lands let unto him yet he shall not lose his term in the Lands let by the Indenture which is so lost If it can be proved any way that there was such a term let unto him by Indenture and that it is not determined so it is of any other Estate in Lands if the Deed that created the Estate be lost if it can be proved that there was such a Deed made and that such an Estate was conveyed by the Deed. Pasc 1650. 14. and 15. Maii. 1650. B. S. For the Estate in the Lands is derived from the Party that made the Deed and not from the Deed otherwise then instrumentally and declaratively to shew his minde and intent that conveys the Estate as also the minde and intent of him that receives it Liberty Matters which do concern the Liberty of any one ought to be determined as speedily as lawfully they may be Trin. 22. Car. B. r. For Liberty is counted very precious and exceedingly favoured in Law not only in respect of the particular profit which every one obtains by his Liberty but also in respect of the Weal-publique For one in prison is disabled to be usefull to himself or any other Where any thing is shewed to be done within a Liberty or a Franchize there it is not necessary to shew within what County that Liberty or Franchize doth lie Trin. 23. Car. B. r. Leet If a Court Leet do not choose a Constable to serve within that Leet the Quarter-Sessions of that County where that Leet is may choose one Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For the Commonwealth must not be unserved and it much concerns the Peace of the Commonwealth but more especially of the County wherein the Leet lies to have such Officers chosen Q. Whether a Court Leet may enquire of private Assaults and batteries if there be no bloud shed in the Case For Bacon Justice and Walker apprentise of the Law of the Inner-Temple held that a Court Leet might enquire of them But Rolle Justice held the contrary Pasc 24. Car. B. r. because they are actionable at the Common Law only by the Party injured and are not publique offences against publique Limitation If a Limitation of an Estate in Lands be uncertain such a Limitation is not good in Law but void Hill 22. Car B. r. For the Law cannot tell what construction to make of such a Limitation by reason of the incertainty of it There is a difference between a condition precedent annexed to an estate subsequent to this condition and a Limitation subsequent annexed to an Estate presently vested Hill 22. Car. B. r. A thing that is expresly limited in a Will by plain words shall not be afterwards made incertain by general words which follow in the said Will. Hill 23. Car. B. r. For that were to encounter a thing that is plain and certainly known with that which is obscure and doubtfull A Limitation of an Estate to begin after the determination of an absolute Estate in Fee-simple is a void-Limitation in Law for if the Law should suffer such a Limitation to be made this would be to suffer perpetuities to be made which the Law doth abhor but yet a Limitation of an Estate to begin after a Fee-simple upon a Contingency is a good Limitation 19. April 1650. B. S. For such an Estate may never take effect London By the ancient Custom of the City of London there ought to be but four hundred Carmen allowed within London Hill 23. Car. B. r. Latitat A Latitat out of this Court is in the nature of an original Writ by
it is a good Amercement but if it be grounded upon a Presentment which is absolutely void the Americement is also void Mich. 24. Car. B. r. Assignement The Assigning of the general Error upon a Writ of Error brought to reverse a judgement is to say that the Declaration is insufficient that judgement is given for the Plaintiff whereas it should have been given for the Defendant c. and it is not shewed for what reason it is so 21. Car. B. r. If one bring an Action of Debt upon an Obligation that was given for performance of Covenants upon supposition of breach of the Covenants he must Assign but one breach in that Action Trin. 22. Car. B. r. otherwise the Desendant cannot justifie or take Issue A Statute Merchant or Staple cannot be Assigned over to another Mich. 22. Car. B. r. If Lessee for yeers Assign all his Term to come in his Lease over unto another he cannot reserve a Rent for if he do such reservation is not good because the Lesse hath no interest in the thing by reason of which the Rent reserved should be paid Pasc 24. Car. B. r. 21. Ap. 1648. In the Case of one Leach and Davy Averment Where a Statute is recited there one may not Aver that there is no such Record for generally an Averment as this is doth not lie against a Record For a Record is a thing of a solemne and high nature but an Averment is but the Allegation of the party 21. Car. B. r. One may not Aver a thing contrary to the Condition of an Obligation no more then he may against a Record for the Condition is part of the Deed which shall be supposed to he made upon good deliberation and before Witnesses and not be contradicted by a bare Averment 7. No. 1650. B. S It was said by the Court that if one assume upon himself to do a future act and an Issue is joyned upon this promise whether he hath done this thing or no the party needeth not to Aver that he hath done it for the doing or not doing of it is Traversable and the Plaintiffe might have taken advantage upon the Defendants Plea if it was not true Avowry If one make an Avowry for two causes and can maintain his Avowry but for one of them yet it is a good Avowry 21. Car. B. r. One Avowry may be made upon two several titles of land though the Avowry is but for one Rent 6. Feb. 1650. Adjournment The Court is Adjourned by the Cryer of the Court after he hath made Oyes three times and the substance of the Adjournment is to give licence to all parties that have any thing to do in the Court to forbear their attendance and to take their ease till such a time precisely named and then to attend in Court again Every last day of the Term and every Eve of a day which is not dies iuridicus or a Law day wherof there is two such dayes in Mich. Term viz. all Saints and all Souls day and one a peece in Hillary Term Easter Term and Trinity Term viz. the day of the purification of our Lady in Hillary Term Ascension day in Easter Term and Saint John the Baptists day in Trinity Term the Court is Adjourmed and before the Statute for the proceedings of the Law in English it used to be done first in English and then in French two several times sitting the Court towards the latter end of the day a good space of time being between the first and second pronouncing of the Adjournment but since the Statute the Court is onely Adjourned in English A Jury which doth not appear full cannot be Adjourned for such a Jury is not accompted a Jury Hill 22. Car. B. r. The first Adjournment of the Court is about eleven of the clock and the last immediately before the rising of the Court. Administration The mother ought to have the Administration of the Goods and Chattels of her child before a son or a brother or a sister 22. Car. B. r. Trin. Where the payment of money would not be for the advantage of the Testator there the not paying of it cannot be pleaded to be to the retarding of the Administration of his Goods and Chattels Mich. 22. Car. B. r. All Actions which an Administrator can have is given unto him by several Statutes Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Where an Administration is granted by such a jurisdiction as the Law takes notice of it is not necessary to shew that the Letters of Administration were granted by the Ordinary of such a place but where the Law takes no notice of the jurisdiction of that Court where the Administration was granted the Letters of Administration must be so pleaded viz. per loci illius Ordinarium Mich 22. Car. B. r. Letters of Administration may be revoked by a Revocation without a seal Mich. 22. Car. B. r. The Ordinary ought not to repeal Letters of Administration which he hath duly granted but if they be unduly granted viz. to such a person who by Law ought not to have them he may revoke them Pasc 23. Car. B. r. One of the half blood is in as equal a degree of kindred to the Intestate to have Letters of Administration granted unto him as one of the whole blood is Mich. 23. Car. B. r. An Indebitatus Assumpsit doth not lye generally against an Administrator Hill 23. Car. B. r. Letters of Administration granted per Carolum Regem debito more adjudged to be well granted in that form Hill 24. Car. B. r. Where the parties that require Letters of Administration from the Ordinary are of equal degree of kindred to the Intestate there it is in the discretion of the Ordinary to grant them to which of them he pleaseth Pasc Mich. 24. Car. B. r. Where one bequeaths a Legacy to one of his kindred and the residue of his goods to another Administration ought to be granted to him to whom the residue of the goods are bequeathed Mich. 24. Car. B. r. Arrest If an Action of Debt be entered in any of the Counters in London a Serjant may Arrest the party without the Sheriffs Warrant Trin. 22. Car. B. r. A Clerk of the Court ought not to be Arrested for any thing which is not criminal because he is supposed to be alwayes present in Court and must answer the Plaintiff there and therefore he that doth Arrest him is punishable by the Court Trin. 23. Car. B r. One ought not to be Arrested upon every slight suspicion of Felony but there ought to be a good ground shewed for the suspition before he is to be Arrested for Fame Life and Libertie are precious things in the eye of the Law Mich. 1649. B. Sup. One that is not priviledged from Arrest by reason of his attendance upon his business in some Court of Justice or some other wayes priviledged by some special Rule or Order of Court may be Arrested in Westminster-Hall sitting the Courts
this debt at a day to come the party to whom he made this promise cannot bring his Action for the Debt untill the day be passed upon which he promised to pay it By Rolle Chief Justice and by German Justice for he said that the promise is a suspention of the Debt pro tempore 29. Jan. 1650. B. S. If one promise unto a woman that in consideration that she will marry with him he will intermarry with her this is a mutual promise and an Action lies by either party against the other for breach of it 18. Ap. 1650. B. S. Appeal In a Writ of Appeal all the pleadings ought to be in French Mich. 22. Car. B. r. This is since altred by the late Statute that Enacts all proceedings in Law to be in English If in an Appeal the Defendant plead in abatement of the Writ and the Writ be adjudged good it is peremptory and he shall not be permitted to answer over but shall be condemned upon the Writ Mich. 22. Car. B. r. In an Appeal the Appellant ought to appear in Court in person yet upon a motion to the Court the Court may admit him to prosecute his Suite by his Atturney Mich. 22. Car. B. r. The defect in any Process in an Appeal doth discontinue all the Appeal and makes an end of the Action as well as a defect in the Original Writ Hill 22. Car. B. r. Age. If the question be whether the party be of full Age or within Age it shall be tryed by the Court by inspection of the party and not by a Jury Hill 22. Car. B. r. Advantage It is not good practice to take an advantage against the Defendant to obtain a tryal the sooner against him for it causeth clamor from the party and makes him oftentimes press the Court for a new tryal Hill 22. Car. B. r. He that will in pleading take advantage of a particular Statute must shew particularly that he is comprised within the Statute Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Assize An Assize is to be Arraigned in French and first the Defendants Councel doth pray the Court that the Tenant may be called which the Court grants and thereupon he is called by the Cryer of the Court and if upon his calling he do appear then the Tenants Councel do demand Oyer of the Writ of Assize and the Return of it which is granted and thereupon he prayes leave of the Court that he may Imparle which is granted to a short day after and the Jury is adjourned by the Court to appear at that day Hill 22. Car. B. r. Note that the Jurors that are to trye the Assize are called Recognitors of the Assize At the day granted to the Tenant to Imparle unto the Tenant is called and upon his appearance he pleads to the Assize in Latin and upon this an Issue is joyned between the parties and after the Jury or Recognitors of the Assize are examined upon oath upon a voire dire whether they had the view of the land in question and if they say they have had then are they sworn to try the Issue and the Councel do proceed to give them their evidence Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Arraignment If in an Appeal brought the Writ be abated the Defendant cannot be Arraigned upon the count which is grounded upon this Writ Pasc 23. Car. B. r. One Awbry that had been formerly Indicted for upon the Statute for having two Wives and was Out-lawed upon this Indictment was brought to the Bar and Arraigned to this effect First the secondary on the criminal side spake thus Awbry hold up thy hand which the prisoner did then he proceeded thus Awbry thou hast been heretofore Indicted of Felony and thereupon Out-lawed in due course of Law for having of two Wives and hast been Arraigned thereupon what canst thou say for thy self why thou shouldest not have sentence of death pronounced against thee Prisoner I take this exception to the Indictment that it is not said to be found per sacramentum duodecim proborum legalium hominum and I desire I may have Twisden and Hales assigned for my Councel Court You shall have them Thereupon the Councel prayed that the prisoner might bring a Writ of Error to Reverse the Out-lawry Court Let him have it Attaint An Attaint doth lie against a Jury that do give their Verdict contrary to the evidence that is given unto them Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Audita Querela Where the Bail is detained in prison in Execution after the judgement which was given against the Principal is Reversed by a Writ of Error there the Bail may bring an Audita Querela to be discharged Pasc 23. Car. B. r. If one be taken in Execution and is afterwards set at liberty and then is taken again and detained in prison upon the same Execution he may bring his Audita Querela to be enlarged Mich. 24. Car. B. r. If a judgement given in another Court be removed into the Upper Bench Court by a Writ of Error and the party who had the judgement notwithstanding the removal of it by the Writ of Error do bring an Action of debt upon this Judgement in the Court where he obtained the Judgement as he may do if afterwards pending this Action of Debt the Judgement be Reversed by the Writ of Error the Defendant against whom the Judgement was obtained may bring his Audita Querela to be relieved against the Action of Debt brought upon the Judgement 3. Feb. 1650. B. S. One Tritton that was in Execution brought his Audita Querela and prayed he might be Bailed and it was granted and he was bailed by four persons 7. Feb. 1650. B. S. Authority Doctor Cowels book called the Interpreter is not a book of Authority to be urged for Law for it was condemned to be erroneous and scandalous by Parliament and by the authority thereof was publikly burned as erroneous and scandalous A verbal authority given by divers Plaintiffs in an Action of Trespas and Ejectment to deliver a Lease of Ejectment upon the Land though the Lease be signed and sealed by them off of the Land Let in the Lease is a good authority to execute this Lease So held in a tryal at the Bar between Vanlore and Crook Mich. 1649. 7. No. B S. Apurtenant and Apendant Yards Orchards and Guardens are Appurtenances to a Messuage but Lands cannot be said to be Appurtenant to a Messuage though they be used with the Messuage for the Messuage is a Messuage though the Lands be taken away Hill 23. Car. B. r. One Messuage cannot be Appurtenant to another Messuage for they are both entire things of themselves Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Account An Action of Account or an Action of Debt lies at the election of the Plaintiff against one for receiving mony of a third person for the use of the Plaintiff although he had no authority given him to receive it Hill 23. Car. B. r. The Statute of limitations of Actions doth not
to give notice of the Lease to the Tenant or Undertenant of the Land in question Hill 23. Car. B. r. For the possession of the Land is primarly in question in this Action and is to be recovered and not the title of the Land though the title of the Land do come in question and is tryed collaterally But now by the new way of practice it is not usual to Seal any Lease of Ejectment at all in an Action of Trespass and Ejectment but the Plaintiff that intends to try the title delivers a Declaration to an Ejector of his own making and that Ejector sends or delivers the Declaration to to the Tenant in possession who gives notice thereof to his Lessor whose title is concerned to defend the title and if neither the Tenant in possession nor his Lessor will defend the title then the Ejector will confess a Judgement to the Plaintiff and so the Tenant will be stripped out of possession but if they or either of them will defend the title then it is usual for them to move the Court that they may be made Ejector to defend the title which the Court will grant if they will Consess Lease Entry and Ouster at the tryal and stand meerly upon the title and if at the tryal they do not then Judgement to be entred against the Plaintiffes Ejector If one do do occupy the Lands in question in an Action of Trespass and Ejectment after the Ejectment Lease made to try the title of the Land is Sealed this is an Ejectment in Law of the Lands in question Trin. 22. Car. B. r. For the keeping of possession of the Lands against him to whom they are let by the Lease doth amount to an Entry upon him although he was never in possession of the Land let If there be two Ejectors made in an ejectione â—irmae one of them may be found guilty of the Trespass and Ejectment and the other as the case may fall out may be acquitted Trin. 22. Car. B. r. An Ejector in Law is any person that comes upon any part of the Land c. in the Ejectment Lease although it be by chance and with no intent to disturbe the Lessee of the possession next after the Sealing and Delivery of the Ejectment Lease and such an Ejector is a good Ejector to bring an Action of ejectione firmae against to try the title of the Land in question Mich. 22. Car. B. r. 1650. B. S. And there is no prejudice to any person by having such an Ejector He that is to try a title of Land by an Action of Trespass and Ejectment ought not to make an Ejector of his own against whom he may bring his Action or to consent or agree with one to come upon the Land let in the Ejectment Lease with an intent to make him an Ejector and to bring his Action against him Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For by that means the Tenant in possession of the Land was often put out of possession by a Writ of habere facias possessionem without any notice given either to him or his Lessor of the Suite But now this is altered by the new way of practise formerly mentioned In every ejectione firmae the Plaintiff ought to set forth in his Declaration in what Parish the Lands in question do lie that the venue may be from the place where the Lands do lie and not from the body of the County except it be when as the Lands in question do not lie in any Vill or Hamlet Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Or lieu Conus for in all such causes it is of necessity that the Jury be of the body of the County because there is not any more particular place from whence the venue may come If one doclare upon a Lease in an ejectione firmae and that by vertue of that Lease he was in possession of the Lands thereby let unto him untill that he was Ejected by the Defendant it is supposed that the Lessor that made the Lease unto him was alive at the time when he brought his Action Mich. 22. Car. B. r. An Ejectment or an Ouster is either an actual Ejectment as when the Lessee is actually put out of the Land let unto him or else it is an Ejectment by implication of Law Pasc 22. Car. B. r. An ejectione firmae ought to be brought for a thing that is certain and not of an incertain thing Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For if the thing be uncertain the Sheriff cannot if the Plaintiff recover know of what to deliver the possession upon the Writ of habere facias possessionem If the Plaintiff in an ejectione firmae do declare for a house lying in two Parishes if the house do lye in either of the Parishes and do not lye in both of them yet is the Declaration good Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For there is certainty enough in it Although in an ejectione firmae there be a Verdict and a Judgement against the Plaintiff yet the Plaintiff may bring another Action of Trespass and Ejectment for the Land Trin. 23. Car. B. r. He may bring divers Actions one after another if he please for a Judgement in that Action is not final By Rolle Chief Justice It is doubtful whether an ejectione firmae do lie de uno crofto Trin. 23. Car. B. r. For the incertainty of the word Croft what it is and what it doth contain If a Lease of Ejectment to try the title of Lands in the possession of I. S. be made to one and after the Lease is made the Wife of I. S. or the servant of I. S. do keep the possession of the Land for I. S. and I. S. do after this occupy the Land I. S. is an Ejector against whom an Action may be brought to try the title of the Land Mich. 23. Car. B. r. 24. Car. B. r. Pasc One who hath title to the Land in question in an ejectione firmae may upon motion to the Court be made a party to the Action that he may thereby defend his title if he will confess the Lease Entry and Ouster Hill 23. Car. B. S. Vid. Supra If a Lease of Ejectment be made of a house and lands occupyed with it to try the title of them and the wife of the occupyer of the house and land continue in possession of the house after the Ejectment Lease is made she is an Ejector as to the house but not as to the Lands Pasc 1652. He who is in any part of a Messuage viz. in the Barn Stable Stall c. after the Lease of Ejectment Sealed and Delivered to try the title of the Messuage is an Eject or for the whole Messuage Pasc 24. Car. B. r. The owner of the Land may consent with the party that claims the Land to make an Ejector to try the title of it if it be not a plot betwixt him and the Ejector Mich. 24. Car. B. r. viz. To strip the Tenant of the Land in
afternoon upon the last day of the Terme and so they said the Common Pleas had done Trin. 1651. B. S. This was that the Attorneys might not defer their Clyents businesses to the last of the Terme as too usually some doe Jeofailes Q If an Issue be joyned upon a collateral point if there be no place alledged whence the Venue may come this is ayded by the Statute of Jeofailes but if the Issue be not joyned upon a collateral point and there is no place alledged from whence the Venue may come it is not helped by the Statute Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Interrogatory One who is by the rule of the Court to be examined upon Interrogatories ought to attend the Master of the Office who is to examin him within four dayes after the Interrogatories are put in for him to be examined upon Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Intendment and Intentions The Law doth not punish any one for the Intention to do ill if the Intention be not put in execution except it be in the case of Treason for there Intentions if they be clearly proved by circumstances shall be punished equally as if they had been put in execution Trin. 22. Car. B. r. But this is only in high treason and is done in terrorem to deter men from that odious offence and of so high a nature being not acted against the Person of one sole person but even against the whole Kingdom which would suffer by it There shall not be Intended to be more then one Parish in a City although there be many except the contrary be shewed Trin 24. Car. B. r. For it is not of the essence or constitution of a City to consist of more Parishes then one but there may be a City that hath but one Parish in it as the City of Rochester in Kent If one be bound in an Obligation to J. S. in a certain summe of money and in the solvendum of the Bond it is not expressed unto whom the money shall be paid the Law will intend it is to be paid to the Obligee Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Because no other person is particularly named unto whom the payment should be made for it shall be intended the money was to be paid to some body and there being no person particularized to whom it should be paid it is but reasonable it should be paid to the Obligee A Court which is pleaded generally to be held secundum consuetudinem shall be intended to be held according to the Common Law but if it be pleaded to be held according to a Custome whereof the memory of man is not to the contrary it shall be adjudged to be a Court held by Custome Trin. 24. Car. B. r. For a Custome must be so particularly pleaded If the Plaintiff do plead that the Defendant did become bound unto him per Obligationem suam it shall be intended that this Obligation was sealed and delivered unto the Plaintiff Mich. 24. Car B. r. For else he did not become bound unto him by his Obligation for an Obligation that is not sealed and delivered is no Obligatien nor is the Obligee bound by it The Intent of the parties shall not be implied against the direct Rules of the Law 5. Feb. Hill 1649. B. r. For an Intent is but to be guessed at and doth not certainly appear but the Law is direct and plain and therefore it shall not be presumed the parties did mean to do any thing against Law where their intent doth not appear by express words Impossibility A thing which is Impossible in the Law is all one with a thing which is Impossible in nature 21. Car. B. r. For the Common Law is not contradictory in any thing to the Law of nature but agrees with it in all things and may be said to be the same in effect with it Impropriation An Impropriatinn cannot be made but by the Licence of the King Mich. 1649. B. Sup. And he may do it as he hath the supreme authority in all Ecclesiastical as well as civil matters within his dominions Livery and Seisin A Corporation cannot make Livery and Seisin to pass away the Freehold Lands belonging to the Corporation but they must make a Letter of Attorney to another under their Common Seal to make Livery and Seisin Mich. 23. Car. B. r. For Livery and Seisin must be made by one and not by a multitude If a Tenant for years of Land do consent that Livery and Seisin shall be made of the Land let unto him unto him that hath purchased the reversion of those Lands and it be made accordingly this is a good Livery and Seisin to make the reversion pass although that the Tenant for years do not go off from the Land at the time when the Livery and Seisin was made but was then in actual possession of it Mich. 23. Car. B. r. For his Term is not prejudiced by the Livery For only the reversion passeth and his Assent amounts but to an Attornment to him to whom the Livery is made If a Deed of Feofment be made of Land Habendum à die datus and the next day after the date of the Deed the Feoffee gives Livery and Seisin of this Land this is a good Livery and Seisin but if this Livery and Seisin were made by an Attorney Q. Quid operatur Mich. 23. Car. B. r. One may give Authority by Paroll unto another to take Livery and Seisin of Lands for him and if such Livery and Seisin be taken accordingly it is good By Rolle Chief Justice Mich. 1650. B. S. For this shews his assent to take the Lands by the Livery and Seisin and the other is but as a Conduit-pipe to convey the Land unto him Lease Lessor and Lessee If one take a Lease by Indenture for years of a ruinous house or that wanteth Reparations and do covenant in the Lease to leave the house at the end of the term in good repair heis bound to do it and an Action of Covenant doth lie for the Lessor against him if he do it 21. Car. B. r. But if he had not covenanted expresly to do it he had not been bound by Law to do it A Lease which is only voidable and not absolutely void must be made void by the Lessors re-entry but if a Lease be absolutely void there needeth no re-entry 21. Car. B. r. That is said voidable which may be made void if the Lessor will and may be continued if he please at his election it is made void by re-entry and putting out the Lessee or else it is continued by receiving the rent and thereby acknowledging him still for his Tenant Where the Freehold of Lands in question in an Action of Trespass and Ejectment is entire although these Lands be let out to several persons for years by several Leases if he whose title is concerned and doth intend to try the Title of these Lands do seal a Lease of Ejectment upon the Lands only that are
award do make an end of all the differences submitted unto the Arbitrators by the parties Trin. 23. Car. B. r. Mich. 24. Car. B. r. An Award ought to be final and certain else it is not good Mich. 23. Car. B. r. If each party submitting to the Award hath power by the Award to compell the other party either by Law or equity to perform the Award the Award is good although the party be thereby put to his Action Mich. 24. Car. B. r. An Award that a thing shall be done to a stranger is a good Award if it appear that the parties who submitted to the Award have benefit by the doing of it Pasc 1650 B. S. 4. Junii If an Award be good in any part of it to all the parties that did submit to it if the Award be broken in that part an Action will lie for that breach Pasc 1650 B. S. 4. Maii. An Arbitrator cannot delegate or transfer the power given him by the parties that submitted to the Arbitration for it is contrary to the submission but an Arbitrator may refer a Ministeral act touching the Arbitration to another Trin. 1650. B. S. 15. Junii The Court will not suppose any thing to be Awarded in an Award which is not submitted unto except the Contrary be made to appear 10. Feb. 1650. B. S. Affirmance It is not proper to move to have a Judgement affirmed after a Writ of Error bought to Reverse it before the Errors be Assigned but one may move for Execution upon the Judgement 22. Car. B. r. Agreement A forced Agreement of the party is accounted to be no Argeement and therefore the Court will not compell him that did thus agree to a thing to perform his agreement 22. Car. B. r. An agreement which is made between the parties onely by Paroll may be discharged and made void at any time before it is broken by Parol without satisfaction but after it is broken it cannot be discharged without satisfaction of it 22. Car. B. r. If an Agreement made by Parol to do any thing be afterwards reduced into writing the Parol agreement is thereby discharged and if an Action be to be brought for the non performance of this agreement it must be brought upon the agreement reduced into writting and not upon the Parol agreement Pasc 23. Car. B. r. The Plaintiff and Defendant may by agreement between them give mony to the Jury before they pass upon the tryal to defray their charges where the tryal is put off and thereby they are forced to stay longer in Town then they expected Mich. 1649. B. S. Agreement By Rolle Chief Justice If the Plaintiffs Atturnoy and the Defendants Atturney do agree to things in order to the proceedings in their Clyents cause though the Clyents do afterwards refuse to consent to their agreement yet the Court will compell the Atturneys to perform the agreement Atturnment An Atturnment made unto Cestuy que use is a good Atturnment in Law to the Feffee of the Land if the Tenant of the land have notice of the use when he did Atturn Tenant to Cestuy que use Mich. 22. Car. B. r. An Atturnment made after Sun-set is not a good Atturnment for an Atturnment is a solmne act and ought to be done so that notice may be taken of it which shall not be presumed to be in the night Mich. 23. Car. B. r. Assumpsit or Promise A promise that is made upon a sufficient consideration is as if it were made upon a precedent condition Mich. 22. Car. B. r. An Assumpsit or promise to do a thing upon consideration that he to whom he made the promise shall surrender an indenture to him is a good consideration to ground an Action upon for breach of this promise although he to whom the Indenture is surrendred do take no estate by this surrender Mich. 23. Car. B. r. If one upon a good consideration do assume or promise to do a thing he that promised to do it shall have a reasonable time allowed to him for the doing of it and shall not have liberty to do it at any time during his life Hill 22. Car. B. r. Where an Assumpsit or promise is the very ground of the Action brought there it must be pleaded precisely but where it is but the inducement to the bringing of the Action there it is not necessary to set forth the promise precisely in the pleading Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Every contract made betwixt parties doth in Law imply a promise that they will perform the contract Hill 1649. B. S. 4. Feb. He for whose benefit a promise is made may have an Action for the breach of this promise although the promise was not made to him Pasc 23. Car. B. r. The consideration to stay his proceedings in a Suit in Law is a good consideration to ground an Assumpsit Trin. 23. Car. B. r. viz. for ever or for a certain time But if he promise to stay Paululum tempus it is not good If one part of the consideration upon which a promise is made to do a thing be against the Law and so void yet if another part of the consideration be good and lawful the consideration is good to ground an Assumpsit upon for the consideration may be divided and if any part of it be good it is sufficient to make the promise good Mich. 23. Car. B. r. An Assumpsit grounded upon a consideration which was past before the promise made is a good Assumpsit if it be alledged to be made at the instance or request of the Defendant Psac 24. Car. B. r. After a promise is broken the party that made this promise cannot be discharged of this promise by Parol but where the promise is executory the may Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Where one becomes legally indebted to another the Law creates a promise that he will pay this debt and if he do not pay it there is a sufficient ground for the party to whom he is indebted to bring his Action of Indebitatus Assumpsit against him to recover this Debt Trin. 24. Car. B. r. If the day of an Assumpsit made be pleaded in figures and not in words at length it is erroneous Pasc 24. Car. B. r. If an Action be brought upon an Assumpsit and upon proof it doth appear that the agreement was more or that it was less in substance then the Plaintiff hath declared upon he hath failed in laying of his Action otherwise it is if some circumstance only be omitted Mich. 24. Car. B. r. In an Action brought upon a promise it is usual to ground the Action upon one promise in the substance of it but to lay the promise divers wayes and by different words in the Declaration to the intent that upon the tryal the Plaintiff may rest or rely upon that way of laying it that his witnesses are best able to prove Mich. 24. Car. B. r. If one be indebted to another and do promise to pay
bar the Plaintiff from bringing an Action of account although he do not bring the Action within the time limited by the Statute for before that Statute one that had once cause of Action might bring it at any time afterward without restriction of time and this Action is not mentioned in the Statute Trin. 1650. 20. Junii B. S. An Action of Account doth not lie for Rent alone due and arrear for the Rent demandable is certain but if Rent be behind and there are also other things mixed with it for which the Action is brought then an Action of Account may be brought for both of them together because it is incertain upon the whole matter what is due to the Plaintiff Trin. 1651 B. S. If one receive money due to me upon an Obligation or for Rent due to me I may either have an Action of Account against him as my receiver or an Action of Debt as owing me so much money as he hath received though in both cases he do receive the mony without my consent Trin. 1651. B. S. Auditor Many things are in charge with the Kings Auditors which are not in the Crown Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Auditors Assigned by the Court upon an Action of Account brought to receive the Account are proper Judges of the cause Trin. 24. Car. B. r. Argument Two that are of Councel on one side ought not to Argue for their Clyent both of them upon one and the same day except it be for concluding of all the Arguments which are intended to be made for that party Mich. 1649. B. S. By the custome of the Court. It is not the usual course of the Court for one Councellor to argue the same Case twice By Rolle Chief Justice 12. Nov. 1650. B. S. Aide and Aide Prayer A Tenant for life may pray in Aide of all such persons as are in remainder of estate in the lands for which he is impleaded 1649. 29 Julii B. S. Baron and Fem. AN Action of Debt doth lie against the Husband for goods that were delivered to his Wife if it may be intended that those goods did any wayes come to the use of the Husband Hill 21. Car. B. r. A Fem Covert cannot submit to an Award for the submission is a free Act of will and the will of a Fem Covert is subject to the will of her Husband and so is not free Mich. 22. Car. B. r. But another person may submit to an Award for a matter which concerns the Fem and such a submission is a good submission in Law A Feofment made to a Fem Covert is a good Feofment in Law to pass the Lands if the Husband do know of it untill the Husband do disagree to it for if he disagree from it the Feofment is not good but if he once agree to it he cannot afterwards disagree from it and if he once disagree he cannot afterwards agree to it Q. Hill 23. Car. B. r. A Fem Covert may take a thing though it be not by Deed. Hill 23. Car. B. r. viz. If her Husband consent to it If a Fem sole be indebted to I. S. and afterward the Fem doth marry this Debt is become by the marriage the Debt of the Husband and of the Wife viz. the proper Debt of the Wife and the Debt of the Husband in right of his Wife and the Wife must be sued for this Debt jointly with her Husband and if the Husband dye pending the Suite yet is not the Debt gone but she may be sued for it after the death of her Husband Pase 24. Car. Trin. 24. Car. B. r. Bar in Actions A Recovery in a personal Action is a Bar in all other personal Actions touching the same matter Hill 21. Car. B. r. That is to say it is a good Ploa in Bar to a personal Action brought against the Defendant to say that the Plaintiff did formerly bring an Action against him for the same matter and did recover against him and therefore he prayes the Judgement of the Court whether he shall be permitted to proceed in his second Action In an Action brought to recover a thing from another if a recovery be there upon had by the Plaintiff the Defendant may plead this recovery in Bar of a second Action brought against him for the same thing 21. Car. B. r. A Plea in Bar which doth not give a full answer to all the matter which is contained in the Plaintiffs Declaration is not a good Plea 21. Car. B. r. viz. If it answer not all the material matter of it If the Plaintiff do reply to the Defendants Plea in Bar this replication is a confession in Law that the Plea in Bar is a good Plea although the Plea be not good Trin. 23. Car. B. r. For the Plaintiff hath slipped his advantage of Demurring to the Defendants insufficient Plea by replying unto it If an Action of Debt be brought against one and he Imparles to the next Term yet after his Imparlance he may plead that the Plaintiff is Out-lawed in Bar of the Action Trin. 24. Car. B. r. Baile One that is in Execution is not Bailable by the Law Hill 21. Car. B. r. For Bail is put in to secure the Plaintiff that the Defendant shall perform the Judgement of the Court and now the Law hath determined the matter and there remains onely for the Defendant to perform the Judgement and for the not performing it he lies in Execution Before a Capias is taken out against the Bail the Principal may render his body to the Marshal of the Court and the entry of this in the Marshals Book is a sufficient ground to discharge the Bail and it is not necessary to enter this upon the Record but if the Principal do render his body after a Capias taken out against his Bail it is in the power of the Court whether it shall be accepted or not and they may if they will give the Plaintiff leave to proceed against the Bail notwithstanding the Principals rendring of his body 21. Car. B. r. Because he did it not in due time but hath put the Plaintiff to the charge and trouble of suing out the Capias One that had been Indicted thirteen yeers before for suspicion of murder in poisoning his servant was brought in Court by a Habeas Corpus and was bailed to answer the fact 21. Car. B. r. Though one that is in Execution do bring a Writ of Error to reverse the Judgement given against him yet the Court will not Baile him except their appear unto them very apparent Error in the Record 21. Car. B. r. For else they will suppose that the Writ of Error is onely brought to gain the parties liberty and so to frustrate the Execution One Arnold James that was Bailed in the 44. and 45. yeer of Q. Eliz. upon a Judgement given against him in the Lord Majors Court of London was brought into Court by a Habeas Corpus Trin. 22. Car. B. r.
For then the Defendant is to go only upon common Bail If the Plaintiffs Atturney do onely tell the Defendants Atturney that his Clyent is to put in special Bail it is sufficient and there common Bail is not to be admitted although the Roll be not marked for special Bail 3. Feb. 1650 B. S. For the notice that there ought to be special Bail is the thing required and the marking of the Roll is but to give notice If one that lies in Execution do bring his Audita Querela he is Bailable 7. Feb. 1650 B. S. So held in Trittons Case By a Rule of the Court the Plaintiffs Atturney must receive the Bail given before the Judge from the Judge himself the same Term it was put in upon pain of five shillings 21. Feb. 1650 B. S. When one becomes Bail for another in an Action of Debt he doth in Law assume or take upon him to render the body of the Principal if he be condemned or else to pay the Debt he is condemned in Pasc 1652. per Rolle B. S. Untill a Capias be Returned against the Principal the Bail shall not forfeit his Recognizance for the principals not appearance by the Ancient course of the Court but at this day by the indulgence of the Court he shall not forfeit his Recognizance if the Principal come in at any time before the Return of the second Scire Facias against the Bail Trin. 1652. B. S. If one be sued in this Court for twenty pounds or above the Plaintiff may by the course of the Court require special Bail but if he sued for a less some common Bail must be accepted Per Barrell Clerk there Special Bail is not generally to be given in an Action of Battery yet in some such cases the Court will compell the Defendant to put in special Bail viz where they perceive it was a foul Battery and much dammage done by it else an Action of Battery is thought a slight Action and not worthy of special Bail If there be no Writ in the Roll nor any notice given for special Bail and common Bail is filed the Plaintiff cannot by the course of the Court require special Baile By Rolle Chief Justice Bail is not to be accounted Bail properly until it be filed for then and not before it is upon Record By Rolle Chief Justice If the Defendant put in Bail before a Judge and it is allowed and yet he will not file it the Plaintiff may if he will at his own charge file it By Rolle Chief Justice Pasc 1655. To avoid Error If Bail be taken by the Judge de bene esse the Plaintiff ought by the Rules of the Court either to allow the Bail or to shew cause to the contrary By Rolle The sufficiency or non sufficiency of Bail ought to be first exaimed by the judge at his Chamber before the Court is to be troubled with the matter but if the Judge cannot make the Plaintiff and Defendant agree in the giving and taking of the Bail then the Court is to be moved in it whereupon they will order both parties to attend and the Bail also and will examine the cause of Action and the Bails sufficiency and settle the matters in difference according to reason By Rolle Chief Justice The cause of marking the Roll for special Bail in this Court is because the cause of Action doth not appear upon the Latitat by which the party was Arrested but it is to be made appear by the Declaration By Glyn Chief Justice But in the Common Pleas where they proceed upon an Original the cause of Action doth appear Burglary Burglary may be committed by one though he do not break a house open for if he be within the house and steal away the goods in the house and open the door on the inside and go out and carry away the goods this is Burglary 22. Car. Trin. B. r. Bankrupt He that is a Bankrupt to one Creditor is accounted in Law to be a Bankrupt to all 22. Car. B. r. He that is once adjudged to be a Bankrupt is to be alwayes accounted to be a Bankrupt 22. Car. B. r. If one shall with an intent to support the credit of a Bankrupt suffer him to have his goods in his custody and to dispose of them the property of these goods shall be accounted to be in the Bankrupt and the true owner of the goods shall lose the property in them 18. Ap 1501. B. Sup. As a punishment for his false dealing herein and of the mischiefs which may grow by such devises to evade the Laws Bench. Where one brings an Action for a Covenant broken he ought to Assign the breach of it in such manner that the Defendant may justifie or take an Issue Hill 22. Car. B. r. Else the party can make no defence for himself If one bring an Action of Covenant against another for not repairing houses c. demised unto him he ought to Assign particularly wherein the want of reparations do consist and not to declare generally Hill 22. Car. B. r. For reparations do consist of particulars If an Action of Debt be brought upon an Obligation for breach of the condition thereof the Plaintiff is not to Assign in what the breach is untill the Defendant hath pleaded performance of the condition Hill 22. Car. B. r. Baliff A Bailiff may execute a Writ out of the Hundred where he is Bailiff Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For he is Bailiff all the County over if he be the Sheriffs Bailiff and not a Bailiff of some Liberty within the County A Bailiff is a servant or minister of the Law and by consequence he is a servant to the party at whose Suite he is to Arrest any one Pasc 24. Car. B. r. A Sheriffs Bailiff is not an Officer of the Court but the Sheriff himself is the Officer that the Court takes notice of Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Bargain and Sale A Bargain and Sale made by one who is not in possession though it be by Deed inrolled is not good if there be no Livery made thereupon Mich. 23. Car. B. r. If one buy a thing of another he that buyes it ought to pay the money he hath agreed to pay for it before the seller of it is bound to deliver it Pasc 23. Car. B. r. One may upon a good consideration dissolve by Paroll onely an absolute Bargain Pas 24. Car. B. r. One may sell his priviledge given him by the Law as his birthright as a freeborn subject for a good consideration Trin. 24. Car. B. r. If one that is indebted do really and bona fide sell his Lands though it be with an intent to avoid the paiment of his Debts this sale is good if the Vendee be not privy to his intent Mich. 24. Car. B. r. If one Bargain and Sell Lands of which another is in possession and claims title to them this Bargain and Sale is not good Trin 1651. B. S. Because
alter the Taxes if they see cause Taxes ought not to be Taxed untill the Atturneys on both sides be heard for their Clyents before the Secondary Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Except it be where either of the Atturneys doth neglect to appear before the Secondary having notice thereof If an Endictment taken in any County be removed by Certiorary into the Kings Bench and the Court be moved that it may be sent back again into the County where it was taken and if the Court upon good cause shewed doe order it accordingly it shall be removed back again at his costs who dedesires it to be removed Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For it shall be intended that the removing of it is for his benefit and ease When upon a tryall the plaintiff becomes non-suit the Defendant must pay the Jury their Costs Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For it is intended he receiveth benefit by the non-suit If there be any such fault in the entring of a speciall verdict so that it must be amended the Plaintiff or Defendant who was the occasion of making the fault must pay the Costs for the amending it Mich. 22. Car. B. r. if it be such a fault that Costs must be expended to amend it If a tryall at the Barr be put off in favour of the Plaintiff or the Defendant and the party that was not the cause of putting it off be compelled by putting it off to keep his Witnesses in Town he that caused the tryall to be put off shall pay such Costs for keeping them in Town as shall be taxed by the Secondary Hill 22. Car. B. r. If one will give leave to another to sue in his Name he that grants the leave shall pay the Costs of the suit Hill 22. Car. B. r. For he is the person upon record of whom the Law takes notice of and the Court takes no notice of the agreement between the parties Costs are not to be allowed for unreasonable motions but only for such as the party was necessarily put unto by the course of the Court. 22. Car. B. r. Arbitrators are to make the Writings touching their arb trement at their own proper Costs and ought not to award that the parties that submitted to the award shall pay for them Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Where the Judges of the Court doe desire to have Books of the Cause depending before them to be advised of the matter in Law the better by considering of the pleadings the Plaintiff and the Defendant ought to joyn in the Costs for the copying of the Books to be delivered to them Trin. 23. Car. B. r. It is the course of the Court to refer the taxing of the Costs to the Secondary of the Office and not to make any speciall rules for such matters Mich. 23. Car. B. r. No Costs are to be allowed upon a Repleader Mich. 23. Car. B. r. For both the parties were in fault to suffer such an insufficient issue to be joyned It is not necessary that the Jury should give Costs but they may leave it to the Court to doe it Mich. 23. B. r. Upon a Judgment upon a Nihil dicit in the Common Pleas that Court will give Costs and dammages generally Trin. 24. Car. B. r. If there be a speciall verdict found in a Replevin the Costs and dammages shall be given either against the replevyer or against the avowant as the issue shall be found for or against them Pasc 24. Car. B. r. The Court will not order any thing concerning the encreasing or mitigation of Costs but the parties are to attend the secondary in it and to abide by his order 13. Nov. 1650. B. S. Except it be in extraordinary Cases If a Juror appear upon a tryall which is to be at the barr and the Jury is adjourned and he doth not again appear at the day of adjournment he shall have no Charges allowed him for his former appearance 2. May 1651. B. S. Chancery A Master of the Chancery hath not power to take an Oath but in a Cause which is depending in the Court of Chancery 21. Car. B. r. The Chancery is not a fixt Court neither in respect of the place where it sits nor of the time when they may sit for they may sit out of the Terme and what place they please 12. Nov. 1650. B. S. By Rolle Chief Justice Capias A Capias duely sued out may be filed afterwards 21. Car. B. r. Challenge When the Jury appear at a Tryall before the Secondary calls them particularly by Name upon the panel to be sworne he bids the Plaintiff and Defendant to attend their Challenges 21. Car. B. r. It is not a sufficient cause to Challenge a Juror because he had delivered his opinion touching the title of the Land in question Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Q. tamen If one take a principall Challenge against a Juror he cannot afterwards Challenge that Juror for favour and waive his former Challenge Pasc 23. Car. B. r. If the Defendant doe not appear at the Tryall when he is called he loseth his Challenge to the Jurors although he doe afterwards appear Mich. 23. Car. B. r. If one Challenge a Juror and doe not make his Challenge good and after the Jury is adjourned he shall not Challenge that Juror again at another day except it be for some matter which is hapned since the adjournment Mich. 23. Car. B. r. If one Challenge a Juror he cannot afterwards have him to be sworne if the Secondary have entred the Challenge Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Q. Whether he may have him sworne if the Challenge be not entred It is a good Challenge against a Juror to say that he was a Juror in a former tryall for the same Land in question and upon the same title though the tryall was between other parties Mich. 24. Car. B. r. When the Array that is the whole Jury is Challenged the Councell of the party that makes the Challenge must read his Challenge in French and after he hath so read it it is to be delivered to the Secondary who is to read it in Latine 6. Nov. 1650. B. S. Which was then done in a Challenge for want of Hundreders But now by the late Statute this is to be done in English After the fore-man of the Jury is sworne the Array cannot be Challenged 6. Nov. 1650. B. S. For then it is too late for to Challenge the Array is to Challenge the whole Jury A Challenge to a Juror for favour is not accounted to be a principal Challenge If some of the Jury be Challenged for favour they shall be tried by the rest of the Jury their companions upon their Oathes whether they be indifferent to try the matter in question or not without going from the barre when they have heard all the evidence that is given against them by the Councel of the party that takes the Challenge 1655. B. S. In a Case tryed at the Barr between the Earl of Leicester and
them from the Barr to consider of their verdict because they are not under seal 28. Apr. 1651. B. S. But all Deeds or writings under seal and given in evidence they may have but nothing which was not given in evidence may they have Conveyance A Conveyance made unto one by his reputed Name although he is not the same person in Law as he is reputed yet is the Conveyance good but if such a Conveyance be made to raise a use then it is not good 28. Apr. 1651. B. S. A Conveyance cannot be fraudulent in part of it and good as to the rest 30. Apr. 1650. B. S. For if it be fraudulent and void in part it is void in all for it cannot be divided If I Covenant to Convey Lands to another I am bound to do it at my own charges except it be otherwise agreed betwixt us Trin. 1651. B. S. Certificate This Court will not make a Rule for a Judg to make a Certificate to them of a matter done before them but if the Judg will do it voluntarily they will receive it Clarke By Roll Chief Justice no Clarke ought to be admitted into the Office of the Custos brevium without the consent of the Lord Chief Justice first obtained and those that are admitted ought to be chosen out of the best of the Clarks in the Upper bench Office 1655. Departure When the Plaintiff doth plead in his Replication a matter which is contrary to that which is admitted in his Declaration this is a Departure from his Plea Mich. 24. Car. B. S. Denison An Alien that is made a Denison by the Kings Letters Patents is thereby enabled to purchase Lands but he is not thereby enabled to inherit the Lands of his ancestors as Heir at Law but as a Purchaser he may injoy Lands of his ancestors Mich. 42. Car. B. S. But if he be Naturalized by Act of Parliament he may inherit them as Heir at Law as well as have them by purchase Delivery It hath been the course to Deliver a Lease of Ejectment to the party to whom the Letter of Attorney is delivered and for the Attorney by vertue of his Letter of Attorney to deliver possession of the Land let by Lease upon his delivery of the Lease Pasc 24. Car. B. r. A Deed cannot be Delivered as an escrow to the party himself to whom the Deed is made Trin. 24. Car. B. r. But it must be delivered to a stranger as an escroe for so soon as it is Delivered to the party to whom it is made it takes effect as a Deed and cannot be an escroe Dower A woman was not Dowable of Tythes before the Statute of 32. H. 8. 24. Car. B. r. A woman is Dowable of a Common appendant but not of a Common in gross Pasc 24. Car. B. r. For Common appendant belongs to Lands and Tenements whereof she was endowable and cannot be severed A woman may be endowed of the profits of an Office or of a Faire or of a Market Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Dower is favoured in Law and as it is favoured in it self so is the party that sues to recover her Dower favoured in her proceedings in Law to recover it as much as in jostice may be permitted Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Difference There is a Difference between the Latine words in dilaté and immediaté and it is more proper to direct a Writ to be retorned in dilate then to direct it to be retorned immediate Hill 23. Car. B. r. For to retorne it in dilate is to retorn it with as much speed as may be and not to use any trifling excuses or delayes to retard the retorn of it but to retorn it immediate is impossible for it will require some convenient time to do it in and as it may fall out longer then is expected Depositions Depositions taken in a Cause depending in Chancery though the Cause be there determined or dismissed may be given in evidence at a tryal at the Barr in a suit depending here between the same parties that sued in the Chancery if the party that deposed to the Interrogatories be dead at the time of the tryal else not but those Witnesses must appear in person in Court and be examined viva voce in the Cause and so it is of Depositions taken in any other Court Mich. 24. Car. B. r. Discretion Where a thing is left to any person to be done according to his Descretion the Law doth intend it must be done with sound Descretion and according to Law And this Court hath power to redress things that are otherwise done notwithstanding they be left to the Descretion of those that do them Trin. 23. Car. B. r. For their Descretion is not properly Discretion but folly or madness Devise A Devise of the profits of Lands for years is a Devise of the Lands themselves for so many years as the profits are Devised Trin. 23. Car. B. r. If a man Deviss his Lands to his children without fayeing more this is but a Devise for life 36. Eliz. B. r. In Dickons and Marshals Case adjudged Hill 23. Car. B. r. A Devise to one of any thing which the Law would have cast upon him although it had not been Devised untohim is a void Devise Mich. 24. Car. B r. For his title to it by Law is his ancient and best title and the Law will adjudge him to take by that An Administrator of a Term cannot Devise it but an Executor of a Term may for an Executor hath a greater interest in his own right then an Administrator hath 1651. B. r. Deodands Deodands that is the Goods and Chattels of which felo de se that is of him that kills himself do belong to the Kings chief Almoner that is he that disposeth of the Kings Alms to distribute them to the poor or to employ them in other pious uses and a discharge given for them to any person that hath such Goods of a felo de se in his possession by the Almoner or his Deputy is a good discharge in Law for them but a discharge given for them by an under-Deputy it no good discharge Trin. 23. Car. B. r. Demurrer If a Demurrer be entred it cannot be waived except both the Plaintiff and Defendant do consent unto it Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Nor then without leave of the Court. A Demurrer may be upon a replication Rejoynder c. as well as upon a Plea Mich. 23. Car. B. r. For all parts of a pleading to issue ought to be according to the Rules of Law and if any part fail the whole is naught If the Court do perceive that a Demurrer is put in onely to put off a tryal or for delaying of the proceedings they will not allow of such a Demurrer nor enjoyn the other party to joyn in the Demurrer but will give Judgement against the party upon his frivolous demurrer Mich. 22. Car. B. r. And 24. Car. B. r. Where there ought to be
be warning given to the Defendant of the tryal 1655. B. S. Executor If one be indebted to I. S. in a certain summe of mony and I. S. makes his Will and deviseth this debt due unto him unto A. B. and makes I. L. his Executor and dyes this debt devised unto A. B. must be paid unto I. L. the Executor and not to A. B. the devisee Mich. 22. Car. B. R. For the Executor and not the Devisee can give a sufficient discharge for this debt If a Scire facias be brought against an Executor to shew cause why he should not pay a Debt unto the Plaintiff recovered against the Testator the Executor cannot plead fully Administred but he must plead that no goods of the Testators are come to his hands whereby he might discharge the Debt Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For he may have fully Administred and yet be liable in Law to pay the debt demanded upon the Scire Facias An Executor which hath Administred goods of the Testator as Executor or that is Executor of his own wrong by disposing of the goods of the party deceased without authority given unto him cannot waive a term of years for Land c. of which the deceased dyed possessed of Mich. 23. Car. B. R. For he hâ—th charged himself to be answerable to all persons concerned as far as the deceased parties personal estate will amount unto But if he have not Assets he may waive the Term. Trin. 24. Car. B. r. An Executor of his own wrong is not by Law chargeable for more then the value of the goods of the deceased doth amount unto and which did come unto his hands and with which he hath intermedled Mich. 23. Car. B. r. The word Executor is a word collective and doth comprehend in it the Executor of an Executor Hill 23. Car. B. r. For he is accountable for the first Testators goods An Executor may recover a duty which was due to the Testator although the Executor was not named in the creation of that duty Trin. 24. Car. B. r. For he represents the very person of the Testator An Execut or may be charged upon a Collateral promise made unto the party by the Testator if the promise was broken in the life time of the Testator else not Mich. 149. B. S. And 16. April 1650. B. S. Escape An Administrator may bring an Action of Escape for an Escape suffered of a Prisoner of the Intestate in his life time Trin. 23 Car. B. r. An Escape in one place is an Escape in all places so that for an Escape the party whose prisoner is escaped may bring an Action for this Escape in what County he pleaseth for the Action is not Local or fixt to any certain place Trin. 24. Car. B. r. But transitory Endictment An Endictment that is framed upon a Statute ought to pursue the words of the Statute Trin. 23. Car. B. r. The Justices of Assize will stay the proceedings against a person for a thing done by him during the time of war and in relation to the war Trin. 23. Car. B. r. For Indictments are to be preferred against persons that act any thing in the disturbance of a peaceable and setled Government If any one be perjured in an Affidavit made in any Court of Record touching any Cause depending in that Court an Indictment may be preferred against him for this perjury upon the Statute Trin. 23. Car. B. r. An Indictment of forcible Entry doth not lye upon the Statute of 8. H. 6. against one for entring forcibly into a Copy-hold but an Endictment doth lye in such a Case by the Statute of 21. Jacob. Hill 23. Car. B. r. Although exceptions be taken against an Endictment to the intent the Court should quash it yet the Court will grant time to maintain the Endictment unto the Kings Councel if they desire it Hill 23. Car. B. r. The Court doth not usually quash Endictments for perjury although the Endictments be faulty but will put the party to plead to the Endictment Hill 23. Car. B. r. For perjury is counted a great offence and therefore the Court doth not favour such offenders An Endictment ought to be more certain then common pleadings in Law need to be Hill 23. Car. B. r. An Endictment ought to express the year of our Lord in which it was taken Hill 1649. 30. Jan. B. r. If an Endictment be drawn so generall and so uncertain that the party Endicted cannot tell how to make a certain answer unto it such an Endictment is not good but may be quashed Pasc 24. Car. B. r. If a word be left out in an Endictment which is but onely in matter of form yet the Endictment is good but if be in matter of substance it is not good Trin. 24. Car. B. r. If one be Endicted for doing of any thing for which he is not by the Law to be Endicted for as for the enclosing of a Common or some other Trespas for which an Action at the Common Law is to be brought such an Endictment is not good but may be quashed Pasc 24. Car. B. r. If one do interrupt a long continued possession of Lands by an unlawful means and the person that is so interrupted of his possession do regaine his possession by unlawful means also yet an Endictment of forcible entry doth not lye against him for doing thereof Mich. 24. Car B. r. For the Law favours long possessions and doth not countenance the disturbers of them In most Cases the Endictment for a Fact done ought to be laid in that County where the Fact was done But this holds not in all Cases Mich. 24. Car. B. r. And Mich. 25. Oct. 1650. B. r. If one be Endicted at a Sessions in London or in any other County and the party Endicted do remove the Endictment by a Certiorari into this Court and do not thereupon quash the Endictment the party that did remove it ought by the Rules of the Court to try the Endictment at his own costs the next Term after that the Indictment is removed 13. Nov. 1650. B. S. Exposition The best Exposition of the Starute Law is to be had by the consulting with the makers of them and how they did in their times interpret them Hill 23. Car. B. r. For they knew best for what end they made the Statutes Contemporarea expositio legis est optima The word videlicet in a Deed is put to expound or make plain the premises of the Deed in which it is put and therefore that which it brings in ought not to be contrary to it for if it be the videlicet is void Pasc 23. Car. B r. If all the words of a Deed can stand together without any absurdity the Law will make such an exposition of them that the whole Deed may be good in Law Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Election An Action of Trespas upon the Case or an Action of Trespas vi armis may be brought against one
brought to reverse this Judgement for it is not a perfect Judgement for the Judgement ought to be quod recuperet in the Present Tense 10. Maii. 1651. B. S. A Writ of Error doth lye for the husband to reverse an Out-lawry against his wife 10. Maii. 1650. B. S. For his own interest is concerned in it If there be two Writs of Error brought to reverse one Judgement and one of the Writs is good and the other is erroneous the Court will take that which is good without any consideration had of the other if it be to affirm the Judgement Trin. 1651. B. S. For the Court doth not favor overthrowing of Judgements Entry If one Enter into the house of another without his consent although the door of the house was open when he Entred into the house yet this is a forcible Entry Mich. 24. Car. B. r. Because it is against the will of the possessor of the house Words alone cannot make an actual Entry and Ouster although they be violent and threatning but there must be force used by the party to make it so Mich. 1650. B. S. For the word Ouster doth implye a violent act to be done and not words spoken onely If he who hath right of Entry into a Free hold in question do Enter into part of it this Entry shall be accounted an Entry in all that part of it which is in the possession of one Tenant but if there be several Tenants possessed of the Free-hold in question there must be several Entrys made upon the several Tenants but if he who hath no right to Enter doth Enter he shall gain title to no more by his Entry then that part onely whereupon he did make his actual Entry 8. Nov. 1650. B. S. If one do make an Entry into Lands c. in the possession of another and he upon whose possession the Entry is made do notwithstanding such Entry continue in possession of the Lands c. with his servants and cattel such an Entry is to no effect to gain the possession but if upon the Entry his servants and his cattel be Ousted from the Land he that is thus Entred upon must prove that after this he did again make an actual Entry into the Lands or else he shall not be judged to have regained his possession 25. Ap. 1650. B. S. For there must be an actual re-entry to gain the possession against an actual Ouster A special Entry into a house with which Lands are occupied by claiming the whole is a good Entry as to the whole house and Lands to reduce the title to him that makes this special Entry from him that was in possession of it and upon whom he entred Trin. 1651. B. S. If one do live in the house with his father and do continue in the house after the death of his father who dyed in possession his continuing there shall not be said an Entry to avoid an estate in the house Pasc 1652. B. S. If one will disclaim a Suit he that doth disclaime must enter his disclaimer upon Record 1652. B. S. Or else the Court cannot take notice thereof Examination A witness that is to be at a tryal to testifie his knowledge there ought not to be examined in any matters concerning the tryal before the tryal except the Plaintiff and the Defendant do agree thereunto Hill 1649. B. S. It is usual in the Court of Common Pleas when a Fem Covert levies a fine for the Judge to examine her whether she do it willingly or no before they take the fine which they will not take without her free consent But where a Fem Covert suffers a recovery she is not examined But Rolle Chief Justice said That he doth alwayes examin a Fem Covert that comes before him to suffer a recovery 8. Nov. 1650 B. S. For the mischief may be as great by the not examining of her in the one case as in the other If a Copy of a Will to be made use of at a tryal be to be Examined in the Prerogative Office it ought to be Examined by the Original Will there if the Original Will be in the Office and not by the Register Book there where the Will is entred 23. Ap. 1651. B. S. For the Will may be misentred there By Glynn Chief Justice The Custos brevium ought to examine the Issue to be tryed with the Plaintiffs Atturney before the tryal Trin. 1655. B. S. That the tryal may not miscary by reason of some slip in the making up the Issue Engagement A Merchant stranger is within the Statute made for the taking the Engagement 18. Nov. 1650. B. S. That Statute is now taken away Exemplification One may Exemplifie a Deed that is make a Copy of it under the great Seal in Chancery and so he may a Bill answer and Intergatories in Chancery and other proceedings there and such an Exemplification is Authentick and may be given in evidence to a Jury upon a tryal 13. Maii. 1651. B. S. A Rulle made in the Common Pleas may be Exemplified in that Court. By Pinsent Preignotary and the Court there 1651. C. B. Q. Whether the like may not be in this Court of the Vpper Bench. Exigent An Exigent against two which is returned in these words Non Comparuerunt and the words Nec aliquis corum comparuit is erroneous and to be reversed 21. Car. B. r. For if any one of the two do appear upon the Exigent he that appears ought not to be Outlawed and so the return is uncertain Endictment When an Endictment is special the Evidence given upon the tryal of this Endictment must prove this special matter and maintain the Endictment but if it be a general Endictment it is not so 21. Car. B r. An Endictment must be certain that the party Endicted may know how to plead to it or traverse or else it is not good but may be quashed Hill 21. Car. B. r. An Endictment ought to be in Latin or else it is not good but may be quashed except it be an Endictment taken before Commissioners of Sewers which may be in English Hill 21. Car. B. r. But now since the late Statute made for all proceedings in Law to be in English all Endictments must be in English The Parish in which the fact was done for which the party is Endicted ought to be named in the Endictment 21. Car. B. r. An Endictment doth lye against one that speaketh blasphemous words 21. Car B. r. It lay then at the Common Law but now by a late Act it lies for speaking of some blasphemous words named in that Act. But Q Whether it now lye at the Common Law for speaking any other blasphemous words not mentioned in the Statute An Endictment for a nusance doth lye against the owner or proprietor of a Ship that is sunk in a Haven or port 21 Car. B. r. For thereby the trade of that place where the Haven or that Port is is hindred and
a Messuage is an entire thing of it self and cannot be apurtenant to another thing Non-sute UPon a Trial when the Jury comes in to deliver in their Verdict and the Plaintiff is called to hear the Verdict If he do not appear after he is thrice called by the Crier of the Court he is to be Non-sute and the Non-sute is to be recorded by the Secondary by the direction of the Court at the prayer of the Defendants Councell Hill 21. Car. B. r. When a Plaintiff is Non-sute if he will again proceed in the same Cause he must put in a new Declaration and cannot proceed upon that Declaration whereupon he did proceed in the Cause wherein he became Non-suite 22. Car. B. r. 16. Ap. 1650. B. S. For by his being Non-suit it shall be intended that he had no such cause of Suite as he deelared in and so that declaration is void The King of Spain hath been Non-suit in England Mich. 22. Car. B. r. And this stands with reason for if a foraign Prince will take the benefit of the nationall Laws here he must proceed and stand to the Rules and orders of the Court wherein he prefers his Action If the Plaintiff will not proceed upon his Declaration as he ought to do by the Rules of the Court the Defendant may Non-suit him Mich. 1649. B. S. Although upon a tryal the Plaintiff be called to hear the Verdict and do not appear to hear the Verdict when he is called and thereupon the Court direct the Secondary to record the Non-suite yet if afterwards the Plaintiff do appear before the Non-suite be actually recorded the Court may proceed to take the Verdict Trin. 1651. B. S. For it is not a Non-suit untill it be recorded by the Secondary and then it is made part of the record and is in the nature of a Judgement against the Plaintiff If the Plaintiff be not ready at the tryal with his Record when the Jury is called the Court will call him Non-suit By Rolle Chief Justice 1651. B. S. For it shall be intended he will not proceed in his cause any further Nolle Prosequi A Nolle Prosequi is where there are divers Issues joyned between the Plaintiff and the Defendant and the Plaintiff enters upon the Roll a Nolle Prosequi That is to say that he will not proceed upon one or more of the Issues joyned and yet he may proceed to tryall upon the rest of the Issues Hill 23. Car. B. r. Nusance A Nusance made in a Port or Haven by the sinking of a Ship there ought to be removed by the owner of the Ship and if he do it not he may be endicted for it as for making a Common Nusance 21. Car. B. r. For it is prejudicial to the Commonwealth in hindering of Trade An Action upon the Case ought to be brought against one that makes a private Nusance and he ought not to be endicted for it Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For Endictments ought to be in the Kings name and do presume to be preferred for offences done against the publike A common Nusance may be abated or removed by those persons who are prejudiced by it Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Nomine Poenae A Nomine Poenae for the non-payment of a Rent ought to be legally demanded if the Rent be behind as well as the Rent is to be demanded before the grantee of the Rent can distrain for it 21. Car. B. r. For the Nomine Poenae is of the same nature as the Rent is and is issuing out of the Land out of which the Rent doth issue Notice The Plaintiff and Defendant are both bound at their perill to take notice of the general Rules of practice of this Court but if there be a special particular Rule of Court made for the Plaintiff or for the Defendant he for whom the Rule is made ought to give Notice of this Rule unto the other or else he is not bound generally to take notice of it nor shall be in contempt of the Court although he do not obey it Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Mich. 1649. B. S. For general rules are the general practice of the Court whereof every one must take Notice of that hath to do there but particular rules are made upon particular and extraordinary matters happening in the proceedings upon the motion of one of the parties made to the Court of which the other may be ignorant The Court is bound Ex Osicio to take Notice of all matters which do appear upon the Record depending before them but of matters Dehors viz. to search the Almanack for dayes and to compute times mentioned in the Record they are not bound Ex Oficio to do it 21. Car. B. r. 24. Car. B. r. Q. The Court is not bound to take Notice of the new stile but of the old English stile 21. Car. B. r. For the old is that whereby all accounts in the Common Law are guided and not by the new which is foreign and goes ten dayes before the English stile or account The Plaintiff ought to give the Defendant eight dayes Notice exclusive before he executes his Writ of Enquiry of Dammages or else the Court will quash it although he have executed it and put him to a new Writ of Enquiry upon the motion of the Defendant made to the Court of his want of such Notice and proof thereof by Affidavit Trin. 22 Car. B. R. and Pasc 1652. B. r. Exclusive is meant that the day upon which the Notice is given is not to be one of the eight dayes but the Writ is to be executed upon the ninth day and so long Notice is to be given that the Defendant may have time sufficient to defend himself by his Councel and Witnesses upon the evidence given against him before the Sheriff and the Jury by the Plaintiff The Common Law doth not take Notice of the intentions of the party to do any unlawful Act except it be in case of high treason Trin. 22. Car. B. r. For mans Law is to regulate the words and Actions of men and not the thoughts of which it cannot have conusanse But Gods Law extends to the thoughts This Court is to take Notice of a general Ordinance of Parliament viz. such a one as concerns the Publique but not of a Parliament Ordinance which concerns some particular persons Mich. 24. Car. B. r. Except such particular Ordinance do appear before them by pleading or otherwise If a Declaration be put into the Office although it be not filed yet is the Defendants Atturney bound to take notice of it Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For it is the Duty of the Plaintiffs Atturney onely to put the Declaration into the Officer and the Officer in the Office is to file it and though it be not filed yet may the Defendants Atturney take a Copy of it None is bound by the Law to give Notice to another of that which that other person may otherwise inform himself
suit is not determined and the Court will intend that he will proceed no further and the Defendant is not to be tyed to attend upon his proceedings upon incertain tyes Although the Verdict given be prejudicial to the Plaintiff as he conceives yet he ought to bring in the Postea Pasc 1651. B. S. 13. Maii. For he must abide by the tryal though it may prove prejudicial unto him A Postea is a record of this Court trusted with the Atturney in the cause by the Clerk of the Assize and the Atturney is bound if he be so trusted to deliver it into the Office that the Judgement may be entred by it by the Officer of the Court Trin. 1651. B. S. It is not necessary to annex the Distringas unto the Postea although it is usual so to do Trin. 1651. B. S. Presumption Where the Plaintiff doth declare in an action of Debt for Rent behind due upon an Indenture of Demise for years it shall not be Presumed that there is any other Rent due or Lease made then that upon and for which the Plaintiff doth declare Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For this would be a foreign construction and for which there is no inducement Where divers houses are let to one by one Lease the Court will Presume that the Lessee is in possession of them all if the contrary doth not appear Pasc 24. Car. B. r. For although the Lessee may possibly have passed away his interest in some of them to other persons yet this not appearing to the Court they will not presume it to be so One Court of Justice will not Presume that another Court of Justice will do unjustice except it do plainly appear unto them that it is so Pasc 24. Car. B. r. For each Court ought to have an honourable opinion of the proceedings of another Court Portes The Cinque Ports are not absolutely exclusive of the Common Law so that it may not intermedle in some Cases with the proceedings in their Courts Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For the Common Law is the universal and supreme Judge of the Nation and no place ought to be so priviledged either by custome or charter as totally to be exempted from its jurisdiction for this might cause a failer of Justice in some cases if it should be so A Writ of Error to reverse a Judgement given in the Cinque Ports is to be brought before the Warden and Constable of Dover Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Whether a Certiorari lies to any of the Cinque Ports hath been a question Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Yet a Certiorari was granted out of this Court to remove a Judgement given at Dymchurch in Kent being a limb of one of the Cinque Poots in Rook and Knights case Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Rot. 381. moved by Launcelot Johnson of the Inner Temple Property He that hath the Land that lies on both sides of a High way hath the Property of the soile of the High-way in him although the King hath the priviledge for his people to pass through it at their pleasures for the Law presumes that the way was at the first taken out of the Lands of the party that owes the Lands that lye upon both sides of the way Mich. 22. Car. B. r. By Rolle So that it seems it is called the Kings High-way because of the priviledge that the King hath in it for his people to pass and repass through it and not in respect of any Property he hath in the soile it self He that hath the goods of another person delivered unto him to keep hath a special Property in them by reason of the delivery of them and may maintain an Action against a stranger that shall take them out of his possession although they be not his own proper goods Hill 22. Car. B. S. Because an Action doth lye against him to whom they were first delivered by him that did deliver them if he shall not redeliver them when he is demanded to do it A Legatee of goods hath no Property in the goods bequeathed unto him before they be delivered unto him by the Executor or Administrator Mich. 23. Car. B. r. For the property of them is not altered by the Will The Rector of a Parish Church shall be intended to be the proprietor or owner of the tithes of the Parish if the contrary be not shewed Trin. 24. Car. B. r. Because generally tithes do belong to the Rector although in many places they do not If the Sea or a River shall by violent incursion and breaking forth carry away the soil of one in so great a quantity that he that had the Property in the soile can know where his Land is he shall have it but if his soil or land be insensibly or by little and little wasted by the Sea or the River he must lose his Land Pasc 1650. B. S. 11. Maii. If one to support the credite of a Bankrupt will suffer the Bankrupt to have his goods in his custody and to dispose of the Property of them the Property of the goods shall be accounted to be in the Bankrupt and the other upon a tryal for the Property of them shall be judged to have lost his Property in them Pasc 1651. B. S. 18. Ap. Because by so doing he was a cause in part that others were deceived by the Bankrupt whose credit he supported and therefore he is justly punished Partition A Partition of Lands ought to be made according to the quality and the true value of the Lands and not according to the quantity or equal number of Acres Hill 22. Car. B. r. For the Partition ought to be equal which is so in the latter but may not be so in the division by equality of Acres Payment Payment of money before the day of Payment appointed is in Law a Payment at the day Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For it cannot be in Presumption of Law any prejudice to him to whom the Payment is made to have his money paid before the time In an Action of Debt brought for Rent due upon an Indenture of Demise of Lands the Defendant may plead payment without a Deed and it is a good Plea in Bar of the Action Trin. 24. Car. B. r. Because the Lessee cannot compell the Lessor to make him any discharge by Deed or Writting upon Payment of the Rent If one buy any thing of another he that buyes it must pay the money contracted for to be paid for it before the seller is bound to deliver him the thing sold Pasc 24. Car. For the contract doth imply such a condition in it A Payment of money shall be interpreted to be made according to his intention that payes it and not according to his intention that receives it Mich. 1650. B. S. 22. Nov. For every one ought to interpret the intention of his own act and not another Procedendo If this Court do proceed to try a Custome of London there the Party may move for
Upon a contract in the nature of a Debt Request or no Request is not material but it is otherwise if the contract be a special contract for a Collaterall thing Mich. 1650. B. S. Repeal The Defendant cannot Repeal his Warrant of Atturney given to an Atturney to appear for him but he is compellable to appear by his Atturney according to his Warrant by the rules of the Court that he may not delay his appearance by that means to the prejudice of the Plaintiff Trin. 22. Car. B. r. Reversal The chief Justice or the ancientest Judge in the Court in his absence doth alwayes pronounce the reversal of an erroneous judgement to be Reversed by a Writ of Error openly in Court upon the prayer of the party and he pronounceth it in French to this effect Pur les errors avandit et auters errors manifest in les record soyt les judgement reverse le Defendant restore a tout ceo que il ad per ceo perd In English thus For the aforesaid errors and other manifest errors in the Record let the Judgement be Reversed and the Defendant restored to all that which he hath lost by it Trin. 22. Car. B. r. But now the Seignior Judge pronounceth it and doth it in English The Reversal of a Judgement may be pronounced conditionally that is that the Judgement is Reversed if the Defendant in the Writ of Error do not shew cause to the contrary at an appointed time Trin. 22. Car. B. r. Where divers persons stand Out-lawed for a forcible entry if the Out-lawry be erroneous it may be Reversed as to one of the persons Out lawed and stand good as to the others but the possession of the Land cannot be restored untill the Out-lawry be Reversed in the whole Hill 22. Car. B. r. The Judge will not pronounce the Reversal of an erroneous Judgement though it be adjudged to be erroneous except the Councel for the Plaintiff in the Writ of Error do pray it may be pronounced Hill 1649. B. S. 30 Jan. For the Judges are only to do justice to those that desire it Restitution and Rerestitution No Restitution is to be granted by the Court upon the suggestion of the insufficiency of an endictment of forcible entry or other matter untill the Certiorari granted to remove the endictment into this Court be returned Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For before the retâ—rn the Court hath nothing before them upon record to judg upon Where an endictment of forcible entry is quashed the Court upon motion doth usually grant the party endicted a Writ of Rerestitution to restore him to the possession of the Land yet the Court may if they please settle the possession of the Land in question according to their own discretions viz. where they shall conceive the most right to be for the possession Mich. 22. Car. B. r. There ought to be no Restitution or Rerestitution granted of the possession of Lands where it cannot be grounded upon some matter of record Hill 22. Car. B. r. A Writ of Restitution lies to restore one to the place of one of the Common Councell of London or to the place of a Constable if he be illegally put out of such a place Trin. 22. Car. B. r. Or to a Church-wardens place or to a Recorders or Town-Clarks place and generally to any publike Office or place of profit or trust but not to a private Office or place The words remisit relaxavit expressed in a Charter of pardon granted by the King unto one for a felony committed by him do not restore him unto his goods which he forfeited unto the King by being convict of the felony but there ought to be the word restituit which doth properly and in its genuine signification import a Restitution to a thing which he hath not whereas the words remisit relaxavit may signifie the remitting or releasing of the claim which one hath to a thing which is in his possession to whom the release is made Trin. 23. Car. B. r. The proper nature of a Writ of Restitution is to restore the party that hath it unto the possession of a free-hold or other matter of profit Trin. 23. Car. B. r. Yet this doth not generally hold for one may have a Writ of Restitution in some Cases to be restored to a place of no profit as is before expressed The Law doth oftentimes restore the possession to one without a Writ of Restitution to wit by a Writ of Haberefacias possessionem and otherwayes in common course and proceedings of justice Trin. 23. Car. B. r. A Writ of Restitution is not properly to be granted but in such Cases where the party cannot be restored by an ordinary way of justice or course of Law and many times such cases do happen Trin. 23. Car. B. r. If one be endicted for a forcible entry and the party endicted do traverse the endictment he cannot have restitution granted unto him before a tryall and a verdict and judgment also given for him although the endictment be erroneous Mich. 23. Car. B. r. Mich. 24. Car. B. r. For it is too late to move to quash the endictment after he hath taken his traverse and so the endictment must stand good against him till the tryall The Justices of Peace only before whom an endictment of forcible entry is found must give the party Restitution who was put out of possession by force and not other Justices of Peace of the County but the Judges of this Court may grant a Writ of Restitution though the endictment was not found before them Hill 23. Car. B. r. For they have a superintendent power over all England Where a Judgment for Land is reversed in this Court by a Writ of Error the Court may grant a Writ of Restitution to the Sheriff to put the party in possession of the Land recovered from him by the erroneous judgment Pasc 24. Car. B. r. There may a Writ of Restitution be granted to one that stands endicted for a forcible entry after he hath traversed the endictment and before the tryall if there do appear to be apparent delay in the proceeding of the Defendant upon the traverse else not as is aforesaid Trin. 24. Car B. r. There cannot be a Writ of Rerestitution granted where there doth not appear to have been a Writ of Restitution formerly granted in the Case Mich. 1650. B. S. For the very word Rerestitution doth imply that there was a Writ of Restitution formerly granted A Writ of Rererestitution may be granted upon a motion for it if the Court see cause to grant it By Ask Justice Pasc 1650 B S. 2. Maii. Upon an endictment of forcible entry found against the party if he do neither traverse nor plead to the endictment the party put out of possession may be restored to his possession without moving the Court. Pasc 1650. B. S. 22. Maii. Rule The Court will not make a Rule for a thing which may be done by the
of Error if he do proceed and take out execution upon the Judgment it is no contempt to the court Mich. 1649. B. S. For it shall not be presumed he knew there was a Writ of Error brought yet though it be no contempt in him to take out the Execution yet the Execution shall be superseded quia improvide emanavit for by bringing of the Writ of Error the hands of the Court where the judgment was given were foreclosed from proceeding any further Replevin A Replevin ought to be certain in setting forth the number and kindes of the Cattell distrained or else it is not good because if it be incertain the Sheriff cannot tell how to make deliverance of the Cattel because he knows not particularly what the cattel are that were distrained Trin. 23 Car. B. r. Replication If the Plaintiff do Reply to a Plea in Bar which is not good by his replying to it he hath confessed it to be good Trin. 23. Car. B. r. And so it shall be now taken to be for he hath lost his advantage of demurring unto it by passing by the defects of it and replying unto it If an Action for the breach of the condition of an Obligation be brought and the Defendant do plead that he hath performed the condition the Plaintiff in his Replication must shew in what particularly the Defendant hath broken this condition Pasc 24. Car. B. r. That the Defendant may be able to give a particular answer to the breach assigned and if he do not assign a particular breach his Replication is idle for it sayes no more then what was formerly said in the Declaration Reservation If the Lessee for yeers assign over all his term to another and reserve a Rent the Reservation is void Pasc 24. Car. B. r. For by the assignment of the whole term he hath no interest in the thing let for the which he can challenge any Rent to be due Recovery A Recovery cannot destroy a thing executory which doth depend upon a contingency Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Because it was uncertain at the time of the Recovery suffered whether it would ever be or no and a Recovery will not work upon so remote and uncertain an estate If a Recovery be suffered by Baron and Fem of Lands whereof the Fem hath an estate in Fee Simple although there was no Tenant to the precipe of the Lands yet this Recovery shall be a good estople against the Baron and Fem and their Heirs but it would be otherwise if the Lands had been Entailed at the time of the Recovery By Rolle Chief Justice Mich. 1650. B. S. 8. Nov. It is not necessary for the Judge to examine a Fem Covert when she joyns with her husband to suffer a Recovery of her own Lands yet it is prudential to do it Trin. 1651. B. S. By Rolle and he said that he used to do it Release If the Defendant in an ejectione firmae will not defend the title of the Land in case the Verdict pass against the Plaintiff the Ejector may Release the dammages to the Plaintiff Hill 1649. B. S. 11. Feb. For he is the Defendant in Law although the title do not concern him and it is the others fault that he was not himself made Ejector to defend the title One is not bound to give a Release unto the Sheriff for moneys which he receives from him which he levyed for him by vertue of an Execution but he must give him a note under his hand that he hath teceived it Hill 1650. B. S. By Rolle Chief Justice Q. tamen Whether he be bound to give him such a note for the Sheriff is an Officer of the Law and upon payment of the money the Law gives him his discharge Recital and Misrecital If a Statute be Misrecited in pleading in a matter which goes to the ground of the Action which is brought upon the Statute it is not helped after a Verdict by the Statute of Jeofailes but if it be Misrecited onely in a circumstancial matter and which goes not to the ground of the Action it is helped after a Verdict by that Statute Trin. 1650. B. S. For the Statute helps onely matters mispleaded in matter of form and not matters of substance Report By the custome of the Court the Secondary ought not to make any report of any matters referred unto him by the Court upon the last day of the Term for that day is properly appointed for motions onely Trin. 1650. B. S. Reversion If one have a Reversion expectant upon a Lease for years he may make a Lease of this Reversion unto the Lessee for years for one year and after make a Release in Fee to the Lessee for years of the Reversion and by this conveyance the Reversion in Fee will pass to the Lessee Mich. 1650. B. S. Reference Matters of Fact betwixt the party in a cause depending in Court are not to be Referred to the Secondary for such matters are tryable by the Jury that is to try the cause but matters concerning the due proceedings or undue proceedings in the cause by either of the parties are properly to be Referred unto him and for him in some cases to compose the differences and in others to make his report to the Court how the matters do stand Pasc 1650. B. S. If a matter in difference betwixt the Plaintiff and the Defendant be referred to the Secondary and one of the parties will not attend at the time appointed to hear the business referred the other party may proceed in the Reference alone and get the Secondary to make his report without hearing of the other party Trin. 1651. B. S. For one party cannot compell the other to attend and therefore such References would many times take no effect for want of the presence of both parties if a report may not be made notwithstanding one of them refuseth to attend Right Lands between the high water Mark and the low water Mark do appertain to the Lord of the Manor next adjoyning of Common Right Pasc 23. Car. B. r. By Rolle Q. tamen Whether they do not rather belong to the King for it hath so been held Scire Facias ONe may have a Scire Facias to revive a Judgement upon which no Execution was taken if it be but seven years past since the Judgement was had without any motion to the Court for it and if it be under ten years since the Judgement was had a Scire Facias may be moved for to revive it at the side Bar but if it be above ten years since the Judgement was had a Scire Facias may not be had without moving the Court for it Pasc 24. Car. B. r. But the Court will not deny it if it be moved for The side Bar is a place where a rail or bar is set up neer to this Court below the Court in Westminister-hall where the Judges stand and rest themselves before the Court sits and where they put on their
is no place alleadged but an issue is joyned and the venire is de corpore comitasus and a Tryal is thereupon had this is good Tryal and there ought not to be a repleader Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For here is a good pleading and a good issue joyned and well Tryed and a repleader is to be onely where the Pleading is vicious and hath not brought the issue in question which was to have been Tryed If the Court do know that the Jury have given their Verdict against the evidence given unto them they may order a new Tryal to be in the case Mich. 22. Car. B. r. Q. Tamen For the Jury are upon their Oaths and it may be they know something of their own knowledge more then the evidence which moved them to give their Verdict so and the party against whom the Verdict is given is not without remedy for he may bring his Attaint against the Jury yet new Tryals have sometimes de facto been awardes in such oases There may be a good Tryal in a cause although the Defendants plea be ill Hill 22. Car. B. r. For the Tryal depends not upon the plea but upon the issue joyned and if there be a good issue joyned the Tryal is good what ever the plea be Where the Plaintiff will not try his cause after issue is joyned the Defendant may try it afterwards when he pleaseth Hill 22. Car. B. r. That he may free himself from the sute When the Defendants Atturney hath told the Plaintiffs Atturney what plea he will plead the Plaintiffs Atturney may give him warning for a Tryal although the issue be not made up in the cause Hill 22. Car. B. r. For after plea pleaded it is in the Plaintiffs choice whether he will reply or no for he may make up the issue when he pleaseth If a cause to be tryed be not entred into the Judges Book before whom it is to be tryed four dayes before the cause is to be tryed the Plaintiff may enter a ne receipiatur in the Judges book that it may not be entred after that to be tryed at that time if the Defendant please Hill 22. Car. B. r. If upon a Tryal to be had at the Bar the Jury be not ready at the day to try the cause the cause cannot be tryed at the Bar any other day of that Term without the consent of both parties Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For it would be too long to keep the Witnesses in Town to another day and if they should go out of Town it might be too short a time and too much trouble to bring them up again the same Term. The agitation of a cause in one Court is no cause to put off the Tryal of the same cause depending in another Court. Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For the proceedings of one Court of Law ought not to clash with the proceedings of another Court but it is not so betwixt the Courts of Law and the Chancery as it is a Court of equity The King may try his own cause in what Court he pleaseth Pasc 23. Car. B. r. By his prerogatine for they are all his Courts and it is not reasonable he should be streightned in his choice where he will proceed A local matter generally is not to be tryed in a foreign County but in the County where the cause of Action ariseth Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For there may the best knowledge of the matter be had and it is also for the greater ease of the people and less charge If one be committed to the Gaol for one Felony yet the Justices may try him for another Felony for which he was not committed Trin. 23. Car. B. r. By Bacon Justice A Decree in Chancery shall be tryed by a Jury and not by it self for it is not a Record but it is a Decree recorded Mich. 23. Car. B. r. And there is difference betwixt a Record and a thing recorded for a Record is a Judgement or other act recorded done in a Court of Record but the Chancery as it is a Court of equity is not a Court of Record but an arbitrary Court although it be a Court of Record as touching things agitated in the pettibag Office Although the Plaintiff after issue joyned and at the Assizes where he was to try his cause do enter a retraxit yet he may try the cause at the next Assizes after if he please for the retraxit doth onely import that he intends to forbear to try his cause hac vice onely and if he do not try it at the next Assizes after then the Defendant may if he will try it by provisoe and if the Defendant do not then try it by provisoe the Plaintiff may give new notice of a Tryal to the Defendant and try it at the next Assizes following Mich. 23. Car. B. r. One that is not served with process to give his testimony at a Tryal may not be examined upon a veire dire concerning any matter which concerns the Tryal Mich. 23. Car. B. r. A Tryal at the Bar ought not to be had for houses lying within the City of London Mich. 23. Car. B. r. If the Plaintiff give notice to the Defendant that he will try his cause that Term although it be not tryed at the day appointed yet he is not bound to give new notice of a Tryal if he try it any time within that Term for one notice is sufficient for the whole Term. Hill 23. Car. B. r. According to the old use of practice in this Court there ought to be but ten Tryals at the Bar in Easter Term. Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Because Tryals at the Bar are a great hindrance to other businesses which are more proper for the Court yet now they are encreased many times to donble the number If there be warning given for a Tryal and no Jury appear at the day there ought to be a new notice given if the party will try his cause at another day Pasc 24. Car. B. r. The consent of the owner of the Land to make one Ejector to try the title of the Land is good if it be not a plot betwixt him and the Ejector to oust the Lessee of the Land of his possession Mich. 24. Car. B. r. A Tryal at the Bar may not be had by the consent of the parties without leave of the Court Mich. 24. Car. B. r. For the Court is not bound Ex Officio to grant a Tryal at the Bar but it is in their discretion to grant it or not to grant it In a Tryal for substracting of tithes in an Action grounded upon the Statute of 2. Ed. 6. the Plaintiff ought first to begin with the proof of the value of the Tithes before he proceeds to shew his title to them Mich. 24. Car. B. r. It is a mis-tryal for a thing to be tryed before a Judge who hath interest in the thing in question and the request or consent of the
contained in the Declaration there he needs not to take a Traverse Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Pasc 1648. B. S. For a Traverse is a denyal of a thing and when a thing is answered what need is there of a denyal of it Where there is a Disseisin and a descent alleadged in a Declaration if the Traversing of the Disseisin will make an end of all the matter there the Disseisin is to be Traversed and not the descent that is in such cases where by supposition the party may come to the estate by Disseisin Pase 24. Car. B. r. Where the Defendant hath confessed and avoided all the matter that is contained in the Declaration there he needs not to take a Traverse Pasc 24. Car. B. r. For a confessing and avoiding is a full answer of the matter alleadged and so there needs no Traverse of it Title If there be an Inquisition found by which the King is Intitled unto Lands and the Inquisition is not answered nor Traversed the Lands found in the Inquisition shall be suppossed to be in the hands of the Kings 21. Car. B. r. Because there appears nothing to the contrary to question the Kings Title If one be admitted to traverse an Office this admission of the party to the traverse doth suppose the Title to be in him 21. Car. B. r. If in an Action of Trespass and Ejectment neither the Plaintiff nor the Defendant can make out a good title then the party that hath had the most ancient possession of the Lands in question shall be judged to have the best Title Pasc 23. Car. B. r. Mich. 1649. B. S. For an ancient possession of Lands is a badge of a Title to them In Action of Trespass brought for taking away of goods the Plaintiff needs not set forth his Title to the goods Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For by the bringing of the Action and by the Declaration it is supposed that they were in his possession before the Defendant took them away from him and that possession is Title enough to maintain the Action He that is made Ejector to try the Title of Land is not bound to defend the Title of the Land if he whose Title is truely concerned will not save him harmeless if the tryal shall pass against him but he may confess a Judgement and save himself of the trouble which otherwise may befall him by being made Ejector Mich. 1650. B. S. The Officer of this Court whose title was to be called the Clerk of the Crown is now called and Intitled Coroner and Atturney for the Keepers of the Liberty of England by Authority of Parliament Mich. 1650. 24. Oct. B. S. But now that Title is also altred and he is called Coroner and Atturney for the Lord Protector Tenement A Tenement may be said to be any House Land or other such like thing which is any way held or possessed and it is a word of a very large and ambiguous meaning and therefore not fit to be used to denominate or express any thing which requires a particular description 21. Car. B. r. Tipstaff The Court will not grant an Attatchment against an Officer of the Court for a misdemeanor committed by him as an Officer of the Court but one of the Tipstaffs which are Officers of this Court called by that name by reason of a staff which they carry tipped with silver is to bring him into the Court. 21. Car. B. r. And they are in the nature of Messengers or Pursuivants c. If a Sheriff do commit a misdemeanor in relation to the Court during his Office and afterwards a new Sheriff is elected whereby the old Sheriff is out of his Office the Court may grant a Tipstaff to bring him in to answer the misdemeanor for being out of his Office the Court cannot fine him for his misdemeanor Pasc 24. Car. B. r. A Tipstaff is to be granted for one that is in London or Westminister but if he be in the Country an Attatchment is to be granted and not a Tipstaff Hill 22. Car. B. r. 23. Car. Pasc 1650. For the Tipstaffs are Officers to attend the Court and are not therefore to be sent out of Town Treason An intention of Treason if it can be proved by circumstances is Treason in the eye of the Law Trin. 22. Car. B. r. To shew the odiousness and greatness of the offence of Treason by punishing the very intentions of it which are not punishable in other offences criminal Time Where the Law doth not imply a certain Time for the doing of a thing nor is there any certain time agreed upon between the parties for the doing it there the Law doth allow the party a convenient Time for the doing of it Mich. 22. Car. B. r. To wit such as shall be adjudged reasonable In some cases one hath time during his life for the doing of a thing if he be not hastened to do it by request of the party for whom it is to be done but if he be hastened by request then he is bound to do it in convenient Time after such request made Hill 22. Car. B. r. Trespass An Action of Trespass doth lye for him that hath the possession of goods or of a house or Lands if he be disturbed in his possession Mich. 22. Car. B. r. If goods be taken by the Sheriff in Execution and the goods be rescoued out of his hands an Action of Trespass lies against him that did rescue the goods Hill 22. Car. B. r. viz. By the Sheriff or by the party at whose sute they were taken and the party may be endicted for a rescous also at the sute of King for disturbing the peace and hindring the Execution of the Law One Action of Trespass may be brought for a Trespass committed in Lands which lye in several Towns or Vills Pasc 23. Car. B. r. So that those Vills do lye in one and the same County An Action of Trespass doth lye for a Parson against him that doth take away his Tithes after they are set forth Pasc 23. Car B. r. For after they are set forth the person hath a property in Law in them although the Parson never had an actual possession of them If divers Actions of Trespass be brought for one and the same cause with an intent onely to vex the Defendant if the Court be moved in it and proof thereof made by Affidavit the Court will order the Plaintiff to joyn all his Actions into one Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For the Judges of the Law do not favor unjust vexations of the people If one do carry another with force into the house of a third person he who carries the other by force into the house is the Trespassor unto the third person and not he who is carryed thither by force and so if one do drive my cattel into the ground of a third person he that drives my cattel into the ground is the Trespassor and not I who am owner of
for which the Action is brought Hill 23. Car. B. r. The Court will not change the venue in an Action brought upon an obligation Hill 23. Car. B. r. Because the Action is personal and transitory and it is at the election of the party to lay it where he pleaseth yet the rules of Court for the laying of personal and transitory Actions have not been very constant of latter times but the Courts do vary as they see cause A Judgment given in an inferior Court was reversed here by a Writ of Error because the Venire was Venire facias c. and not at large Hill 1650. B. S. But such a Venire in the Common Pleas is good For the constant course there is to enter the Venire briefly with an c. The Defendant may move to alter the Venue although the Plaintiffs Declaration be not perfect Mich. 1650. 25 Oct. B. S. For though it be not perfect in all things yet it may be so perfect that he understands where the Venue is laid and that is enough to ground a motion upon to alter it if it be laid where it ought not to be In an Action of Debt brought for Rent due for Land the Venue may not be laid out of the County where the Land lies for which the Rent is due for the Action is a locall action ratione terrae out of which the rent is issuing Hill 1650. B. S. 29. Jan. A Venue cannot be laid in Wales in a transitory Action the Cause whereof did arise in England because this would be to remove the Cause to be tryed out of the jurisdiction of the Court and then this Court can give no judgment in it Trin. 23. Car. B. r. The Venue cannot be changed after the Defendant hath pleaded although the Plaintiff have amended his Plea in a principall and materiall part of it after the Defendant put in his Plea and though the Defendant do imparle by reason of that amendment for all this makes it not a new Declaration 1650. B. S. A Venire out of an inferior Court ought to runne thus Ideo praeceptum est in eadem Curia or per candem Curiam Hill 1649. B. S. 30. Jan. But now those Latine words must be in English It is not necessary to insert the Names of the Jurors in the Venire facias although it was the antient course to do it Hill 1649. B. S. 4. Feb. So that antient forms may be altered upon good reason else not Where the Declaration is good but the Plea is uncertain and yet an Issue is joyned and tryed upon it this is a mis-tryall for there can be no judgment given upon it and therefore there must be a Repleader and a new Venire to summon another Jury to try the Cause again Hill 1649. B. S. 8. Feb. A Venire facias is oftentimes retorned before the Plea be entred and yet it is well enough Pasc 1650. B. S. 24. Maii. For the Plea is a Plea before it is entred so that there is an Issue to be tryed which is a sufficient warrant for awarding and retorning of the Venire A Venue is not to be changed in an Action of Debt brought for Rent or upon an Obligation or in an Action of Covenant or in an Action of Accompt Trin. 1650. B. S. 26. Junii Mich. 1650. B. S. 23. Nov. The Venire ought to be delivered to the Sheriff four dayes before the retorn of it if the Jury do dwell forty miles off and eight dayes if they dwell further off then forty miles from the place where the tryall is to be Pasc 1651. B. S. 13. Maii. If the Defendant do move to change the Venue upon Affidavit made that the cause of Action if any be did arise either in Kent or Surrey for example and not in London where the Action is laid the Plaintiff shall have his election to lay his Action either in Kent or in Surrey upon giving the Defendant notice in which of them he will lay it but shall not lay it in London 1651. B. S. The Attorneys are sworn not to lay personall Actions in forreign Counties but in the Counties where the causes of them did arise and the Statute doth also prohibit it for the laying them in forreign Counties doth put the people to charge for motions to alter the Venues into their proper Counties and therefore it is fit the Attorneys should observe it By Rolle 1650. B. S. But as yet the practice herein is unsetled and inconstant And it may be it is not setled because there might great inconveniences grow by setling of it and tying up the hands of the Court from doing that which the exigency of the case may require Verdict If there be severall ejectors of severall parcels of Land mentioned in a Lease of Ejectment the Jury ought to finde this matter especially Hill 21. Car. B. r. A Verdict which is found against a Record is a void Verdict Hill 21. Car. B. r. For a Record is of a higher nature and more credit is to be given unto it then unto a Verdict If a Verdict may be any wayes construed to make it good there ought not to be made a construction of it to destroy it and make it void Hill 21. Car. B. r. For the Law delights in the preservation of things and would not have things to be done in vain The Court will not take a Verdict by default except the Plaintiffs Councell do pray it Hill 21. Car. B. r. For the Plaintiff may choose whether he will take the Verdict or no and therefore the Court will not take it except he desire it If the Plaintiff doth fail in proving of his Issue the Verdict ought to be found for the Defendant except the Jury do know of their own knowledg that the Defendant is guilty Hill 21. Car. B. r. So that the Jury is not so tyed up by the evidence that they must alwayes give their Verdict according to it If one of a Jury that found a Verdict were outlawed at the time when the Verdict was found the Verdict is not good but may be reversed by error Hill 21. Car. B. r. For an out lawed person is out of the protection of the Law and is debarred from intermedling with any Civil affairs as a person excommunicated is from participating in Divine Ordinances If a Verdict be found for the Plaintiff and he will not enter it if the Defendant move the Court in it they will compell him to enter it and so it is where the Plaintiff doth refuse to enter a Verdict found for him upon the executing of a Writ of enquiry of Dammages Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For the Plaintiff ought to rest satisfied with what the Law gives him Or the Defendant may enter it himself if he will A Declaration that is not good is in many cases helped after a Verdict by the Statute of Jeofailes but where the Declaration doth not make it appear that the Plaintiff had some
examined as a Witness if the tryal be in London but he that obtains the Habeas Corpus must carry him thither and bring him back at his own charge and peril that he make no escape Trin. 1650. B. S. 29. Junii Q Tamen Whether it ought to be done where the prisoner it in Execution If a Witness be sick so that he cannot be at a tryal and it is so proved by Affidavit and that Witness hath been formerly examined upon intergatories in the Chancery in that matter upon which he is to be examined upon at the tryal the intergatory may be admitted to be read in evidence to the Jury at the tryal 1652. B. S. If one that hath been burnt in the hand for a Felony committed by him and be pardoned for the Felony he may be admitted as a Witness in a cause By Rolle Chief Justice 1652. B. S. For by the pardon his offence is pardoned and he is made rectus in curia Will. A Codicil may be added by Paroll unto a Will in Writing and this Paroll codicil shall be put in writing and affixed to the Will as a codicil This may as well be done as a Will in writing may be revoked by Paroll as it may well be Hill 22. Car. B. r. Pasc 23. Car. B. r. A Will which doth onely concern the bequeathing of Lands c. ought to be proved in the Chancery but if it be a mixt Will and doth concern Lands Goods and Chattels also it may be proved in the spiritual Court Hill 22. Car. B. r. The probate of a Will per testes is no corroboration of the Will Hill 22. Car. B. r. Although the common opinion is otherwise for if it come in question at the Law whether a Will or no Will it is no evidence to a Jury to prove it a Will because it was proved per testes A Will in writing is a good Will to convey Lands although the Will be not sealed Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For the Statute of 32. H. 8. that enables to convey Lands by Will speaks nothing of sealing but onely of writing such wills If the Testator make his Will by Paroll and do give direction to put his words in writing which is done in his life time accordingly this is a good Will to convey Lands although he do not afterwarde declare that writing to be his Will during his Life but if his words were not put in writing till after his death it is not a good will within the Statute to convey Lands Pasc 24. Car. B. For it was not his will in writing during his life as it must be to convey Lands If the Testator do make his Will by Parol which is afterwards put by another in writing by his direction and there is more expressed in the writing then the Testator did express by Paroll yet the Will in writing is good as to so much of it as can be proved was expressed by Paroll Pasc 24. Car. B. r. For so much of it was the Testators will and what is expressed more shall be void If a Will be made by Parol and it is afterwards put in writing and the writing is embezeled lost or destroyed yet is not the Will thereby destroyed if it can be proved by witnesses Pasc 24. B. r. For the Paper is not the mind or will of the Testator but onely a Declaration and Manifestation what his mind and will was and if that can be made appear any otherwayes it sufficieth A Will by which Lands are conveyed ought not to be kept in the Prerogative Office for it doth properly belong to the Legatee of the Lands to support his title by if he be questioned for the Lands Mich. 1649. But they may take a copy of it and enter it into their Leiger Book The Testator may if he be at that time of sane memorye desire another person to set his hand and seal to his Will for him and if he do it the Will is a good Will though the Testator did it not himself Pasc 1650. Maii. 5. If one make his Will in his sickness by the over opportunity of his wife to the intent he may be at quiet and not vexed and troubled by her such a Will shall be adjudged to be made by constraint and is not a good Will By Rolle Chief Justice in the Case of one Hacher and Newborne tryed at the Bar. Mich. 1654. B. r. Q. Tamen For Voluntas non potest cogi and it differs from the cases of making of a Deed by Menace or Duress as me seems FINIS
alleged a place from whence the venue should come and it is not alleged but omitted and yet an issue is joyned between the parties and the veniâ—e is from the body of the County the Defendant may Demur upon the venire facias if he will but if he do not Demur but suffer the tryal to pass this is a good tryal Mich. 22. Car. B. r. For he hath slipped his advantage of Demurrer Where a Statute gives leave to plead generally and the party waives this leave and pleads specially the other party may Demur upon his special Plea if he see cause Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For though he needed not to have Pleaded specially yet having done it the Plea must be good at his own peril A generall Demurrer doth not lye to a Scire facias Pasc 23. Car. B. r. For it is in the nature of a judicial Writ Upon a Demurrer to an evidence given to a Jury at a tryal the Jury are to be discharged and not to pass upon the tryal But the matter in Law in question upon the Demurrer is referred to the Judges to determin Pasc 23. Car. B. r. A Demurrer to an evidence is when the party that doth demurre upon it doth demand the judgment of the Court whether the matter given in evidence be sufficient admitting it to be all true to finde a verdict for the Plaintiff upon the issue that is joyned betwixt him and the Defendant Pasc 23. Car. B. r. And when such a Demurrer is taken the Plaintiff and the Defendant must agree the matter of fact in dispute betwixt them otherwise the Court cannot proceed to determine the matter in Law but there must be a Venire de novo to try it Trin. 23. Car. B. r. The party that is delayed in his proceedings by reason of a Demurrer may move the Court to appoint a short day after to hear Counsel speak to the Demurrer and the Court will grant it Trin. 23. Car. B. r. In a Demurrer upon an evidence the party demurred unto may demand judgment of the Court whether he ought to joyn in the Demurrer or not Trin. 23. Car. B. r. For if there be not a colourable matter for to ground the Demurrer upon the Court will not force the party to joyn in it but will overrule it One cannot demurre upon a thing upon which an issue cannot be taken by reason of the doubleness and by consequence doubtfullness of the matter Trin. 23. Car. B. r. After the Plaintiff and Defendant have joyned in the issue which is to be tried betwixt them neither of them can Demurre without the consent of the other Trin. 23. Car. B. r. For by their joyning in the issue both parties have admitted the whole pleading to be good as to try the issue There must be a speciall Demurrer to a negative preignance that is a negative Plea which doth also contain in it an affirmative and to an argumentative Plea that is a Plea which concludes nothing directly but only by way of argument or reasoning and to a double Plea for a generall Demurrer doth admit them to be good Mich. 23. Car. B. r. For is doth not shew any fault in them as a speciall Demurrer doth One may demurre to a Demurrer for the doubleness of it but if he that might demurre doth not demurre to it but joynes in the Demurrer he cannot demurre afterwards for he hath slipped his advantage Mich. 23. Car. B. r. A Demurrer is double when that he that doth demurre doth assign in his Demurrer for cause of it one error in fact and another error in Law to be in the Plea upon which he demurres which he ought not to do in one Demurrer Mich. 23. Car. B. r. One may demurre to one part of a Declaration and yet plead to the other part of it with a Quo ad c. Mich. 23. Car. B. r. Discharge If an Attachment be granted by the Court against one and he is thereupon apprehended he shall not be discharged upon an affidavit made on his behalf but he that is attached must appear in person in Court and be there Discharged Mich 22. Car. B. r. For it is a personal offence for which he is attached and he shall not therefore be discharged except he yeeld obedience in person A paroll agreement before it is broken may be discharged by paroll or word but after it is broken it cannot be discharged without satisfaction made for the breach of it Hill 22. Car. B. r. For by the breach of it an injury is done to the party which requires satisfaction Hill 20. Car. B. r. If one be arrested by a Latitat out of this Court and the Plaintiff do not declare against him in two Terms after if the Defendant move the Court that he may be discharged because the Plaintiff doth not prosecute his suit against him the Court will Discharg him Pasc 23 Car. B. r. For liberty is precious and much favoured in Law If the Plaintiff at whose suit the Defendant is in execution do give the Defendant leave to go at large that is out of prison the execution is thereby discharged and if the Plaintiff do take the Defendant again upon the same execution and commit him to prison the Defendant may bring an Audita quercla against the Plaintiff for his illegall imprisoning of him Mich. 23. Car. B. r. For it shall be intended that the Plaintiff had satisfaction upon the execution or else he would not have given the Defendant leave to go at large A Prisoner that is committed for Felony and brought to this Barr by a Habeas Corpus cannot be discharged although the retorn upon the Habeas Corpus be not sufficient to give the Court satisfaction that he was justly committed Pasc 24. Car. B. r. A Prisoner that is brought to the Barr to be bailed by a Writ of Habeas Corpus if he were committed for matter on the Crown side he must be brought into Court on the Crown side that is on that side of the Court where the Master of the Crown-Office sits but if he stands committed for a matter determinable on the Pleas side he must be brought into Court to be bailed on that side of the Court where the Master of the Kings-Bench Office sits viz. on the left hand of the Lord Chief Justice Pasc 24. Car. B. r. Of later time it hath been permitted by the Court to Discharge the bail if he bring in the principall before the retorne of the second Scire facias issued out against the bail but antiently it was not so Mich. 24. Car. B. r. A Judgment cannot be Discharged by pleading a Paroll agreement between the parties to discharge it 27. Jan. 1650 B. S. For matters of record are not to be wiped off with words Disseisor If one enter wrongfully into my Lands and after his entry I accept rent of him for the Land I cannot afterwards take him for a Disseisor Trin 24. Car. B. r. For