estate if the sale be not effectuall and in case the vendor have no warrant for such goods by him sold No living Cattell shall be sold but onely in Cities Ll. Gulielm cap. 60. and before three witnesses nor shall any thing forbidden be sold without warranty No faires or markets shall be holden but onely in Cities Ibid. c. 61. Burroughs walled Towns and Castles These Lawes concerning sales and markets were ancient Saxon lawes and tend all to the avoyding of cheating men of their Cattell by surreptitious sale of them made by such as had no right Goods found shall be published by the finder to the neighbourhood Ll. Gulielm cap. 7. and if any makes claime and proofe of them to be his he shall have them giving security to bring them into the Court in case any other shall within a yeere and a day make his claim thereto The children of persons intestate shall equally divide the heritage Ll. Gulielm cap. 36. This is in terminis the Saxon law and therefore concerning it I shall referre to the same formerly recited onely I shall adde hereto the law of Henry the first Ll. Hen. I which may serve as an explanation of the former Any free man may devise his chattels by will and if he die intestate his wife children parents or next kinne shall divide the same for his soules good The first branch whereof was ancient and doubtlesse in continuall use but the iniquity of the Norman rude times was such that the Lords under surmise of arreares or reliefe would seise all the personall estate after the tenants death and so the right of last wils was swallowed up but this restoreth the power of last wils into its place and in case the party died intestate preserveth a kind of nature of descent although they be more personall Nor doth that last clause of the soules good disannull the same although the words may seem to carry away the benefit to some other hand For the whole matter is left to the discretion of such as are next to the intestate CHAP. LII Of Laws that concerne common interest of Lands THe Laws that concerne Lands and peculiarly belonging to the Normans are such as concerne principally the tenure of Lands which if duly considered although savoured somewhat of the King yet little of the Conquerour for generally it must be granted that tenures long before and after this time were as the services ordered according to the will of the giver in which as the King had the greatest share and he the most publique person of all so were his donations ordered chiefly to advance the publique service and in this regard the tenure by Knight service might more principally challenge the Kings regard then the regard of all the great men besides But this was not the soare yea rather it was the beauty and strength of the Kingdome and for which the King deserved an honorable name above most of his progenitors who had not so much land to dispose of as he had and therefore could not advance that service in any proportion equall unto him The sore that caused so many sighes was the incumbrances raised upon this most Noble and free service which through the evill of times by this meanes became the most burthensome and the onely loathed and abhorred service of all the rest I say through the evill of times for it cannot lodge in my thoughts but in the Norman times the incumbrances were nothing so great as of latter ages and that much hath been imputed to the Lawes of the Conquerour which they never deserved as may appeare in these particulars which the Laws of Henry the first have preserved in memory Tenant of the King or other Lord dying 1 Reliefe M. Paris An. 1100 1213 his heire shall pay no other reliefe then what by Law is due That which by Law is due is set down in the laws of William the Conquerour The Reliefe of an Earle Ll. Gulielm cap. 12. 8. Horses sadled and bridled 4. Helmets 4. Cotes of Maile 4. Shields 4. Speares 4. Swords 4. Chasers bridled and sadled 1. Palfray bridled and sadled The Reliefe of a Baron Ibid. c. 23. 4. Horses with Saddles Bridles 2. Helmets 2. Cotes of Maile 2. Sheilds 2. Speares 2. Swords 2. Chasers bridled and sadled 1. Palfray bridled and sadled The Reliefe of a Vavasor to his Lord Ibid. c. 24. His best Horse His Helmet His Cote of Maile His Shield His Speare His Sword Or if he had no Armes then he was to pay s. 100 The reliefe of the Countrey man is the best beast that is in his possession Ll. Gulielm cap. 29. and of him that farmeth his Lands a yeeres rent These are the Reliefes due by law and now setled in goods or armes but afterwards turned into money and its likely that the ill customes in the former times did extort both money and armes or such summes of money as they pleased and by the very words of the law it seemes they had brought it to an arbitrary power to take what they could get and yet all against Law 2. Marriage The Kings tenant shall advise with the King in marriage of his daughter sister neece or kinswoman and his widdow in like manner The sence hereof in short is that these might marry at their own will without paying fine or composition to the Lord and yet must have the liking of the Lord so farre as to declare whether the man intended were his enemy or not and fit to performe Knight service This law was therefore grounded upon the present distresse of affaires wherein the nation was unsetled and common right having established a mutuall trust between Lord and Tenant found out this meanes to preserve the same for if the marriages of those that are related to the Tenant in such manner as may inherit part or all his lands or have joynture therein should be left altogether at the liberty of the Tenant or his widow it must needs follow that the mutuall trust between Lord and Tenant must faile and the publique receive dammage And therefore if this custome were of Norman birth it was begotten bpon a Saxon law and might the rather be owned by the English 3. Dower The widdow of the Kings Tenant having children shall have her dower and portion so long as she keeps unmarried The portion here is in the Latine word maritagium which I take to be the marriage portion given by the husband according to the Saxon custome when as the dower in land was not in use whereof is spoken formerly in that Chapter of dower And the Normans were necessitated to introduce this custome of theirs with themselves partly because it was a priviledge which was their own by birth and it could not be waved without an evident wrong done to the wives of these men who had ventured their lives in that service but principally because it would not consist with
there as may appeare in the severall relations thereof made by Matthew Westminster and Sir Henry Spelman an Author that he maketh much use of and therefore I shall be bold to make the best use of him that I can likewise in Vindicating the truth of the point in hand For whatever this Councill was it s the lesse materiall seeing the same Author recites a president of King Aethelbert within six yeares after Austins entry into this Island which was long before this Councill which bringeth on the Vann of all the rest of the Opponents instances which King called a Councill styled Commune Concilium tam Cleri quam Populi Pag. 126. and in the conclusion of the same a Law is made upon the like occasion Si Rex populum Convocaverit c. in both which its evident that in those times there were Councils holden by the People as well as the Magnates or Optimates His next instance is in the yeare 694. which is of a Councill holden by the Great Men but no mention of the Commons and this he will have to be a Parliament albeit that he might have found both Abbatesses or Women and Presbyters to be Members of that Assembly and for default of better attested the conclusions of the same notwithstanding the Canon Nemo militans Deo c. But I must also minde him that the same Author reciteth a Councill holden by King Ina Suasu omnium Aldermannorum Seniorum Sapientum Regni and is very probable that all the Wise men of the Kingdome were not concluded within the Lordly dignity The third instance can have no better successe unlesse he will have the Pope to be allowed power to call a Parliament or allow the Arch-Bishop power to doe that service by the Popes command for by that authority this what ever it be was called if we give credit to the relation of Sir Henry Spelman who also reciteth another Councell within three leaves foregoing this Concil Britt Pag. 212. called by Withered at Barkhamstead unto which the Clergy were summoned Qui cum viris utique militaribus communi omnium assensu has leges decrevere So as it seemeth in those times Ibid. pa. 194. Souldiers or Knights were in the common Councels as well as other Great Men. In the next place he bringeth in a Councill holden in the yeare 747. Ibid. pa. 242. 245. which if the Arch-Bishop were then therein President as it s sayd in the presence of the King was no Parliament but a Church-mote and all the conclusions in the same doe testifie no lesse they being every one concerning Ecclesiasticall matters Pag. 219. And furthermore before this time the Author out of whom he citeth this Councill mentioneth another Councill holden by Ina the Saxon King in the presence of the Bishops Princes Lords Earles and all the wise old Men and People of the Kingdome all of them concluding of the intermarriage between the Brittons Picts and Saxons which formerly as it seemeth was not allowed And the same King by his Charter mentioned by the same Penman noteth that his endowment of the Monastry of Glastenbury was made not onely in the presence of the Great Men but Cum praesentia populationis and he saith that Omnes confirmaverunt which I doe not mention as a worke necessary to be done by the Parliament yet such an one as was holden expedient as the case then stood Forty yeares after hee meeteth with another Councill which he supposeth to be a Parliament also but was none unlesse he will allow the Popes Legate power to summon a Parliament It was holden in the yeare 787. and had he duely considered the returne made by the Popes Legate of the Acts of that Councill Pag. 300. which is also published by the same Author hee might have found that the Legate saith that they were propounded in publike Councill before the King Arch-Bishop and all the Bishops and Abbots of the Kingdome Senators Dukes or Captaines and people of the Land and they all consented to keep the same Then he brings in a Councill holden in the year 793. which he would never have set downe in the list of Parliaments if he had considered how improper it is to construe Provinciale tenuit Concilium for a Parliament and therefore I shall need no further to trouble the Reader therewith The two next are supposed to be but one and the same and it s sayd to be holden Anno 974. before nine Kings fifteene Bishops twenty Dukes c. which for ought appeares may comprehend all England and Scotland and is no Parliament of one Nation but a party of many Nations for some great matter no doubt yet nothing in particular mentioned but the solemne laying the foundation of the Monastry of Saint-Albans What manner of Councill the next was appeareth not and therefore nothing can be concluded therefrom but that it was holden in the yeare 796. That Councill which is next produced was in the yeare 800. and is called in great letters Concilium Provinciale which he cannot Gramatically construe to be a Parliament yet in the Preface it is sayd that there were Viri cujuscunque dignitatis and the King in his Letter to the Pope saith concerning it Pag. 321. Visum est cunctis gentis nostrae sapientibus so as it seemeth by this and other examples of this nature that though the Church-motes invented the particular conclusions yet it was left to the Witagen-mote to Judge and conclude them There can be no question but the next three Presidents brought by the Opponent were all of them Church-motes Concil Brit. Pag. 328. For the first of them which is sayd to be holden in the yeare 816. is called a Synod and both Preists and Deacons were there present which are no Members of Parliament consisting onely of the House of Lords and they all of them did Pariter tractare de necessarijs utilitatibus Ecclesiarum The second of them is called a Synodall Councill holden Anno 822. and yet there were then present Omnium dignitatum optimates which cannot be understood onely of those of the House of Lords because they ought all to be personally present and therefore there is no Optimacy amongst them The last of these three is called Synodale Conciliabulum a petty Synod in great letters Concil Brit. Pag. 334. and besides there were with the Bishops and Abbots many Wise men and in all these respects it cannot be a Parliament onely of the great Lords The next Councill said to be holden in the yeare 823. cannot also be called properly a Parliament but onely a consultation between two Kings and their Councill to prevent the invasion of the Danes and the attests of the Kings Chapplain and his Scribe doe shew also that they were not all Members of the House of Lords The Councill cited by the Opponent in the next place was holden An 838. being onely in nature of a Councill for Law or
of their estates as well reall as personall especially in the particulars ensuing The most ancient of all the rest was the First-fruits First-fruits which was by way of eminency called Cyrick-sceate or in more plaine English Church-fee which was alwaies payable upon St Martins day unto the Bishop out of that house where the party did inhabit upon the day or Feast of the Nativity Concil Brit. p. 185. An. 693. Concil Brit. p. 545. It was first granted by Parliament in the time of King Ina and in case of neglect of payment or deniall it was penall eleven-fold to the Bishop besides a fine to the King as was afterwards ordered by Canutus Tythes Concil Brit. p. 298. An. 787. After the first fruits commeth to consideration the Revenue of Tithes whereof I finde no publique act of state to warrant till the Legatine councell under Offa although the Canon was more ancient The Bishop at the first was the generall receiver as well of these as of the former and by him they were divided into three parts and imployed one to the poore another for the maintenance of the Church Concil Brit. 259. and a third part for the maintenance of the Presbyter But in future times many acts of state succeeded concerning this Ingulsus amongst which that grant of Athelwolfe must be a little paused upon Some writers say that he gave the tenth mansion Gest pontif Lib. 2. cap. 2. and the tenth of all his goods but Malmsbury saith the tenth of the hides of Land but in the donation it selfe as it s by him recited it s the tenth mansion But Math. Westm understands that he gave the tenth part of his Kingdome An. 854. but in the Donation by him published it is decimam partem terrae meae In my opinion all this being by tradition little can be grounded thereupon The forme of the Donation it selfe is uncertaine and varions the inference or relation more uncertaine and unadvised for if the King had granted that which was not his owne it could neither be accounted pious or rationall Nor doe we finde in the donation that the King in precise words gave the Land or the tenth part of the Land of his Kingdome but the tenth of his Land in the Kingdome and the exemplification published by Math. Westm countenanceth the same albeit the Historian observed it not but suppose that the Kingdome joyned with the King in the concession and that it was the course to passe it onely in the Kings name yet could not the tenth Hide tenth Mansion or tenth part of the Kingdome be granted without confusion in the possessions of the people for either some particular persons must part with all their possessions or else out of every mans possession must have issued a proportionable supply or lastly a tenth part of every mans possession or house and land must be set forth from the rest or some must lose all and become beggars to save others all which are to me equally improbable Neverthelesse I doe not take the thing to be wholy fabulous but may rather suppose that either a tenth was given out of the Kings own Demesnes which is most probable or else the tenth of the profits of the Lands throughout the Kingdome and that it was by publique act of state and that clause forgotten by Historians Concil Brit. p. 392. An. 905. Ibid. 527. An. 1009. And thus might a good president be led to Alfred Athelstan and other Kings who setled Lawes under payment of penalties and appointed the times of payment viz. the small Tithes at Whitsuntide and the great Tithes at Alhollantide Another Tribute was that of Luminaries Luminaries Concil Brit. p. 377. Ibid. 545. An. 1032. which by Alfred and Gunthrun was first setled by Law although it had been before claimed by Canon It was payable thrice a yeere viz. Hollantide Candlemas and Easter at each time a halfe penny upon every Hide of Land and this was under a penalty also Ploughalmes An. 905. Another Income arose from the Plough and under the name of Plough-almes at the first it was granted by Edward the Elder generally and the valew was a penny upon every plough and in after times it was ordained to be payd fifteen daies after Easter An. 1009. Souleshot Concil Brit. d. 571. An. 1009. Next comes a fee at the death of the party which was commonly called Soul-shot and payd before the dead body was buried unto that Church where the dead parties dwelling was so as they never left paying and asking so long as the body was above ground and its probable turned into that fee which was afterward called a mortuary The incumbent also of every Church had Glebe laid to the Church Glebe Concil Brit. 260. An. 750. besides oblations and other casuall profits as well arising from houses bordering upon the Church as otherwise All these foure last were payable to the Priest of that particular Congregation and had not their beginning till Parishes came to be setled Peterpence Lastly the zeale of the charity of England was not so cold as to containe it selfe within its own bounds they were a dependent Church upon Rome and their old mother must not be forgotten An Almes is granted for under that lowly title it passed first but afterwards called Romscot or Romesfeogh or Heord-penny for it was a penny upon every hearth or chimney payable at the Feast of St Peter ad vincula and therefore also called Peter-pence it was for the Popes use and was setled under great penalties upon the defaulters It arose by degrees and parcels Concil Brit. p. 230. An. 725. for first Ina the Saxon King granted a penny out of every house in his Kingdome after him Offa granted it out of every dwelling house that had ground thereto occupied to the yeerely valew of thirty pence Concil Brit. p. 311. An. 791. excepting the Lands which he had purposed for the Monastery at St Albans This Offa had a much larger Dominion then Ina and was King over three and twenty shires after whom Aethelwolfe passed a new grant thereof out of his whole Kingdome Ibid. 343. An. 847. which was well nigh all that part which was called Saxony with this proviso neverthelesse that where a man had divers dwelling houses he was to pay onely for that house wherein he dwelt at the time of payment Ibid. 621. Afterward Edward the Confessor confirmed that Donation out of such Tenements as had thirty pence vivae pecuniae If then it be granted that the Saxon subjects had any property in their Lands or tenements as no man ever questioned then could not this charge be imposed without the publique consent of the people and then the assertions of Polidore and the Monks who tell us that Ina and Offa had made the whole kingdome tributary to Rome must needs be a mistake both in the person and the nature of the gift seeing
antiquity For Aethbald the Mercian King above eight hundred yeeres agoe gave the Monastry of Cutham Concil Brit. 319. with all the Lands thereto appertaining to Christchurch in Canterbury and for the confirmation thereof commanded a clod of earth with all the Writings to be laid upon the Altar Another Monument hereof more ancient by the space of above 100 yeers we finde in that grant of Withered King of Kent Concil Brit. 192. of foure plough lands in the Isle of Tenet the latter part whereof this clause concludes thus Ad cujus cumulum affirmationis cespitem hujus supradictae terrae super sanctum altare posui Last will But every man had not liberty to execute the law of his inheritance in his life time for some were surprised with sudden occasions and unexpected issues and ends and in such cases they did what they could to declare their intents by last will which by common intendment being in writing hath occasioned some to thinke that the Saxons in their originall had no use thereof being as they conceived so illiterate as not having the use of writing but the Character remaining to this day evinceth the contrary nor can those words of Tacitus nullum est testamentum in any rationall way be expounded in this sence if we consider the context which runneth thus Haeredes successores cuique liberi nullum est testamentum Which in my opinion sounds in this sence The heires and successors to every one are his children and there is no testamentary power to disherit or alter the course of descent which by custome or law is setled Otherwise to deny them the use of all testamentary power was a matter quite abhorring the custome of all the Grecians from whom they learned all that they had M Westm An. 817. Malmsb. gest Reg. l. 2. c. 2. Neverthelesse the Saxons had not been long acquainted with the Romanists but they had gotten that trick of theirs also of disheriting by last will as by the testament of Aethelwolfe and others of the like nature in Histories may appeare The conveyances formerly mentioned concerned Lands and goods but if no such disposall of goods were Goods the ancient German custome carried them after the death of the ancestor promiscuously or rather in common to all the children but in succeeding times the one halfe by the law of Edmond passed to the relict of the party deceased by force of contract rather then course of descent After him Edward the Confessor recollecting the Laws declared that in case any one died intestate the children should equally divide the goods which I take to be understood with a salvo of the wifes dower or portion As yet therefore the ordinaries had nothing to doe with administration for goods passed by descent as well as Lands and upon this custome the Writ de rationabili parte honorum was grounded at the common law as well for the children as the wifes part F.N. Br. 122. according as by the body of the Writ may appeare CHAP. XLII Of times of Law and vacancy SUch like as hath been shewed was the course of government in those darker times nor did the fundamentals alter either by the diversity and mixture of people of severall Nations in the first entrance nor from the Danes or Normans in their survenue not onely because in their originall they all breathed one ayre of the laws and government of Greece but also they were no other then common dictates of nature refined by wise men which challenge a kind of awe in the sence of the most barbarous I had almost forgot one circumstance which tended much to the honour of all the rest that is their speedy execution of justice for they admitted no delaies till upon experience they found that by staying a little longer they had done the sooner and this brought forth particular times of exemption Miror cap. 4. Sec. 16. as that of infancy and child-bearing in case of answer to criminail accusations But more especially in case of regard of holinesse of the time as that of the Lords day Saints daies Ll. Sax. cap. 10. Concil Brit. 518. Fasts Ember daies for even those daies were had in much honour Nor onely daies but seasons as from Advent to the Octaves of Epiphany from Septuagesima till fifteen daies after Easter or as by the Laws of the Confessor till eight daies after Easter and from Ascention to the eighth day after Pentecost and though as Kings and times did change so these seasons might be diversly cut out as the Laws of Alfred Aethelstan Aetheldred Edgar Canutus and Edward doe manifest yet all agreed in the season of the yeere and that some were more fit for holy observation then others And thus by the devotion of Princes and power of the Clergy the foure Terms of the yeere were cut out for course of law in the Kings Court the rest of the yeere being left vacant for the exercise and maintenance of Husbandry and particular callings and imployments saving that even in those times the Courts of the County and Hundred held their ancient and constant course Last of all and as a binding law unto all Miror cap. 4. Sec. 18. it was provided that false Judges should give satisfaction to the party wronged by them and as the case required to forfeit the residue to the King to be disabled for ever for place of judicature and their lives left to the Kings mercy CHAP. XLIII An Epilogue to the Saxon government ANd thus farre of the joynts of Saxon government in their persons precincts courts causes and laws wherein as the distance will permit and according to my capacity I have endeavoured to refresh the Image of the Saxon Common-weale the more curious lineaments being now disfigured by time afarre off it seems a Monarchy but in approach discovers more of a Democracy and if the temper of a body may appeare by the prevailing humour towards age that government did still appeare more prevalent in all assaults both of time and change The first great change it felt was from the Danes that stormed them and shewed therein much of the wrath both of God and man And yet it trenched not upon the fundamentall law of the peoples liberty The worst effect it had was upon the Church in the decay of the power of Religion and worship of God For after much toile and losse both of sweat and blood the Danes finding that little was to be gotten by blows but blows and that the Clergy at the least was the side-wind in the course of all affaires laid aside their Paganisme and joyned with the Clergy and as their converts and pupils gained not onely their quiet residence but the favour of the Clergy to make triall of the Throne and therein served the Clergy so well as they brought the people to a perfect Idolatry with times places and persons and subjection of their estates to Church tributes
common law and Kings prerogative would agree thereto The complaints are of this natures 1. That the Church-possessions in their vacances are wasted and that Escheators doe not onely seise the personall estate of the Abbot or Prior deceased but such Corne in the barne and other goods belonging to the houses for their maintenance as also the profits of Churches impropriate 2. 3 4 5. Elections are either disturbed by the Kings Letters praeceding or by delay of the Royall assent subsequent the said elections 6. The Lay power without the advice of the Clergy doe put in eject or restore incumbents to Benefices voyd 7. Prelates are summoned to answer to the Lay power in the Writs Quare excommunicavit and Quare non admisit 8. Clerks are distrained in their Lay fees to answer before the Lay power in action of debts trespasse or other personall actions and in case they have no Lay fees the ordinary is distrained by his Barony to cause the Clerke to appeare 9. The Laity are forbidden to take oath or to inform upon oath before the Prelates and to obey Prelates commands in such cases 10. Persons taken and imprisoned upon excommunication are ordinarily dismist without satisfaction unto the Prelate and sometimes are not taken by the Sheriffe 11. 12. 33. 13. notwithstanding the Kings Writ and as well the King as his Officers doe ordinarily communicate with such as are excommunicated and likewise command others to communicate with them 14. Clerks imprisoned for felony are refused to be delivered to the Ordinary unlesse upon security to appeare before the Justices in Oyer 15. and sometimes are hanged before their Ordinary can demand them and sometimes their heads are all shaven that they may not appeare to be Clerks 16. Justices itinerant doe imprison Clerks defamed for felony or otherwise outlaw them if they doe not appeare And otherwise proceed against Clerks after their purgation before the ordinary 17. 18. The Lay power seises upon the estates of Clerks degraded for crimes 19. Clergy are compelled to answer and give satisfaction for offences against the forrest laws 20. before the Lay power And in case of default the Bishop by distresse is compelled to order satisfaction 21. as well in such cases as in person all actions 22. Priviledges of Sanctuary are invaded by force 23. Executors of Bishops are hindred from administring the estate without licence first obtained from the King 24. The Kings tenants goods are seised after their decease by the Kings Bailiffs 25. Intestates goods are seised by their Lords and their Ordinary hindred from administration 26. The Kings prohibition passeth in case of Tythes and Chappels 27. The like in cases of troth-plight perjury cerage heriet or other Church duties as money for reparations of Churches and fences in Churchyards 28. pecuniary punishment for Adultery 40. 29. and costs of suit in Ecclesiasticall court sacriledge excommunication for breach of the liberties of the Church contrary to the grand Charter 30. In cases of prohibition if the Ecclesiasticall Judge proceed contrary to the same he is attached and compelled to shew his acts in Court if the Lay Judge determine the cause to be temporall the Ecclesiasticall Judge is amerced if he proceed against the prohibition and it s tried by witnesses of two ribaulds and in case it be found for the Ecclesiasticall Judges cognisance 31. yet there is no costs allowed for such vexation 32. That Jewes in matters Ecclesiasticall aforesaid are by the Kings prohibition drawn from the Ecclesiasticall Judge unto the Lay Magistrate 34. Question about Lands given in Frankalmoine are tried in the Lay courts 35. 36. 37. 38. and by reason of such tenure the owners though Clergy men are compelled to doe suite at the Lay courts and are charged with impositions and are distrained hereunto although the Lord have other Land of the Donor in Frankallmoine subject to his distresse 39. Prelates summoned to higher Courts are not allowed to make atturnies to appeare for them in the inferior civill courts 41. Grantees of murage or other unwonted impositions compell the Churchmen to pay the same 42 43. The Clergy are charged with Quarter Cart-service and purveying 44. The chancery sendeth out new Writs contrary to the liberties of the Church and the law of the Land without the assent of the Councell of the kingdome Princes and Prelates 45. The King doth compell the Clergy to benevolences to the King at his voyage into forraine parts 46. Amercements granted to Clergy men are turned into fines by the Justices and by them taken 47. Clergy men are fined for want of appearance before the Justices itinerant and of the Forest upon common summons 48. Quo warrantoes granted against the Clergy for their liberties and the same seised unlesse they be set down in expresse words in their Charter 49. 50. notwithstanding that by long custome they have enjoyed the same and many times contrary to expresse grant This is the summe of their paper of grievances and because they found the King either wilfull or unconstant they resolve upon a remedy of their own by excommunication and interdiction not sparing the persons of any principall or accessory nor their Lands no not of the King himselfe and for this they joyn all as one man Now what scare this made I know not but Henry the third in the Stat. of Marlb and Edward the first in his Stat. at Westminster and other Satatutes the first spake faire and seemed to redresse some of these complaints as also did Edward the second and yet the Common law lost little ground thereby That which Henry the third did besides his promises of reforming was done in the Stat. of Marlbridge The successors of Abbats Priors and Prelates Marlbr c. 29. c. shall have an action of trespasse for trespasses done nigh before the death of their predecessors upon the estates of their Corporations And shall prosecute an action begun by their Predecessors And also shall have an assize against intruders into any of the possessions belonging to the said Corporations whereof their predecessors died seised This might seem a remedy provided against the first malady complained of and questionlesse bound all but the King and so might perchance abate somewhat the edge of that Article But it being the Clergies reach to grow rich and the Popes cunning to help on that worke that they might be as stores for supply of his treasury and had forbidden Abbats and other Prelates c. the liberty of disposing their estates by last Will. Kings therefore as supreame patrons to these bodies in their vacances used to seise all the estates of the Prelates with the temporalties to their own use as well to preserve the riches of the kingdome to it selfe and the possessions of such Corporations from spoile as to be a cloke of their own covetousnesse And under the estates of the Prelates or heads of these Corporations all the
in Edward the firsts time by the Ordinance of Circumspecte agatis and Articles concerning prohibitions the difference was made between dammages and pre reformatione and the same affirmed by this Law and so the matter setled and the fourth Article of the Clergies complaint in some measure satisfied cap. 4. Defamation within cognisance of the Ecclesiasticall court and corporall penance therefore and Commutation The words are generall and peremptory with a non obstante the Kings prohibition and yet the Law afterwards restrained the sence to defamation for crimes or offences triable in the Ecclesiasticall court and this gave further satisfactin to the fourth Article of the Clergies complaint foregoing cap. 5. Tythes of new Mils may be recovered in the Ecclesiasticall court This Tythe of Mils was a new incroached Tythe never mentioned in any former law of this Kingdome nor demanded by the Synod at London Anno 1173. which mentions fruit trees young broods of living creatures that are tame Herbage Butter Cheese with other particulars but mentions not new Mils It s true that anciently Mils payd Tythes but such they were which were ancient and had payd the same by custome and such as by Law in the Confessors time were declared to be given a Rege Baronibus populo But by the second Article of the Clergies complaint next foregoing it appeares that the Kings Mils refused to pay this Tythe now whether the new Mils were called the Kings Mils as being made upon the publique streames by the Kings licence or whether the Mils newly made within the Demesnes of the Crown it s not to be insisted upon but its evident that till this Law made the new Mils would not tythe their labours One and the same matter may be tried at the common Law after sentence in the Spirituall Court in divers respects cap. 6. The great sore that was complained of was that the Clergy after purgation in the Ecclesiasticall court made were proceeded against in the Kings court in case of breach of peace or fellony as may appeare out of the 16th Article of the Clergies first complaints and the 8th Article of that taken out of Baronius Neverthelesse the present law subjoynes an example of the questioning a Lay man in the Ecclesiasticall court in case of violence done to a Clerke as a matter which may be tried in the Ecclesiasticall court and yet reviewed by the Kings court The Writ de Excommunicato deliberando shall not issue forth but upon evident breach of the Kings liberty cap. 7. This might be intended in satisfaction of the tenth Article of the Clergies complaint in Baronius and the tenth Article in the Clergies complaint first recited although that complaint both in the 10 11 12 and 33 Articles seem to be but clamour upon Officers and not the Kings court of justice Clerks Officers to the Exchequer are to be corrected by their Ordinaries cap. 8. and yet not tied to residence during their attendance on the Exchequer This is in part an answer to the second Article of the Clergies last complaint and a justification thereof as a thing that is pro bono publico Clergie mens goods shall not be distrained either in the high way or Sanctuary grounds cap. 9. unlesse such as have been of late purchase The complaint exhibited in Henry the thirds time and the 8th Article was onely in ordinary personall actions but in the complaint made in Edward the seconds time Article 12. is that it s without cause that they are so distrained This law yeeldeth them somewhat viz. immunity from distresse within their ancient possessions which had been by ancient custome priviledged but yeelds nothing as touching their latter purchased Lands because they had no such custome cap. 10. High waies and Sanctuaries shall be free for such as abjure so as they shall neither be restrained from liberty nor necessaries kept from them Felons may make free confession to the Priest without danger The grievance in the 22th Article of the Clergies complaint in Henry the thirds time and the ninth in that of the times of Edw. 2. are hereby relieved provided that the delinquent keeps himselfe in due order cap. 11. Houses of Religion shall not be oppressed with corodies pensions or entertainments of great men This answered the grievance in the 42 and 43 of the first complaint and the 18 of the latter and in effect little other then what was formerly setled by VVest 1. cap. 1. cap. 12. The Kings Tenants may be cited before the Ordinary out of their own Town and if Excommunicated for want of appearance the Writ de excommunicato capiendo shall be awarded A remedy this was against the grievances in the 12 and 33 Articles of the first complaint and in the 10th Article of the last scedule of complaints And thus the Clergy have gotten the day of the Kings Tenants which they had been striving for ever since the conquest as may appeare by what hath been formerly said and now the Kings Tenants are in no better condition then other men viz. they may now be excommunicated without the Kings licence nor is the answer Nunquam fuit negatum to be referred to the point of Excommunication for that power was denied them but unto the citing them out of their own Parish which cannot be found to be denied to the Clergy by any thing that yet appeareth A Clerke presented and found unable by the Ordinary shall be tried againe by the Ecclesiasticall cap. 13. and not the Lay Judge Although the fitnesse or sufficiency of the party presented is to be examined by the Ordinary yet the civill Magistrate hath power in action brought to inquire and determine whether the Ordinaries worke was rightly done and so the 17 Article of the last complaint answered Elections shall be free cap. 14. The law was of the same with this in the Stat. W. 1. cap. 5. which see before and it may be that the iniquity of the times continued notwithstanding and so occasioned the renewing of this law A Clerke having taken Sanctuary shall not be compelled to abjure cap. 15. Nor after confession of the crime cap. 16. or appealing others before the secular Judge shall be denied his Clergie Although the Temporall courts proceeded not so farre as to passe sentence against a Clerke that had taken Sanctuary yet they proceeded to inquiry as may appeare by what was said formerly concerning the Stat. West 1. cap. 2. and therefore though this law in the 15th Chap. alloweth that a Clerke in Sanctuary shall enjoy his Ecclesiasticall liberty yet the words legi Regni se reddens are interposed and the reason is because the King upon indictment found had right to the delinquents goods and profits of his lands untill due purgation 7 E. 2. Fits tit forfaiture 34. and then his Lands were by a Writ out of the Chancery to be restored to him againe nor could any purgation regularly
was in those elder times but in two cases viz. of Kings and Castles in the one of which the government is principally concerned in the other the publique defence For it may be well conjectured that Castles were either first made in places commodious for habitation and great Towns gathered to them for their better safety or that the Townes were first gathered in places of commodious habitation and then Castles were made for their better defence or if they were imposed upon them by the victor to keepe them in awe they were neverthelesse by continuance together become tractable and conspired for the mutuall defence of each other But as touching such Cittadels or Castles that were set in solitary places they may seem rather first intended for the particular defence of some particular man and his family and neighbouring tenants and therefore in the purveyance for Castles it seems the proper Town wherein it is is principally liable to that duty because their safety is more principally interested and therefore prizes there taken may be payd at a day to come but in all other places immediately Neverthelesse this lasted not long for the souldiers found out a tricke of favouring their own quarters and preserving them in heart against a back winter knowing that at such times its better to seeke for provision nigh then to be compelled to seeke far off But this Stratagem was cut off by the next King who inhibited all manner of purveyance in any other Town Westm 1. cap. 7 then in the same Town wherein the Castle is seated This was a charge that was but temporary and occasionall That which was more lasting and burdensome upon the subjects was purveyance for the King which neverthelesse cannot be avoyded by reason of the greatnesse of his retinue especially in those daies and if they should have their resort to the market the same could not be free to the people for that the first service must be for the Kings household and so what scraps will be left for the Commons no man can tell It was therefore necessary for the Kings family to be maintained by purveyance Artic. super cart cap. 2. and to avoyd the many inconveniences which might and did arise in those spoyling times It was ordained that it should be felony for any purveyor to purvy without warrant 2. That none but the Kings purveyour must purvey for the Kings house and that he must purvey onely for the Kings house and to purvey no more then is necessary and to pay for the things they take And because Kings were oftentimes necessitated for removall from place to place purveyance of carriage was also allowed West 1. c. 32. and in case the subjects were grieved either by more purveyance then was necessary or by non payment for their commodities so taken or with composition for the Kings debts for such purveyance the offenders were lyable to fine and imprisonment Artic super cart cap. 2. Or if they were grieved by purveyours without warrant the offender was to be proceeded against as in case of felony He that serveth in Castle-guard is not liable to payment of rent for that service cap. 22. Nor is he compellable to either so long as he is in the service in the Army By the ancient custome none but a Knight might be charged with the guard of a Castle belonging to the King for the letter of this law mentioneth onely such and therefore to hold by Castle-guard is a tenure in Knight-service and it seemeth that rent for Castle guard originally was consistent with Knightservice and that it was not annuall but promiscuously Knights might either performe the service or pay rent in lieu thereof and upon occasion did neither if the King sent them into the field And lastly that a Knight might either doe the service in his own person or by his Esquire or another appointed by him thereto No Knights nor Lords nor Church-mens Carriages cap. 23. nor no mans wood shall be taken against the owners consent Nor shall any mans Carriages be taken if he will pay the hire limited by the Law Churchmen were exempted from charge to the Kings carriages meerely in favour to the Canon which exempted the goods of the Clergy from such lay service neverthelesse the complaints of the Clergy formerly mentioned shew that this was not duely observed Knights and Lords were discharged not onely for the maintenance of their port but more principally because they were publique servants for the defence of the Kingdome in time of warre and the Kingdome was then equally served by themselves and their equipage and their carriages as a necessary assistant thereunto The King shall have no more profit of felons Lands then the yeere and a day cap. 24. and the Lord is to have the remainder Anciently the Lords had all the estate of felons being their tenants Instit 2. and the King had onely the prerogative to waste them as a penalty or part thereof but afterwards the Lords by agreement yeelded unto the King the yeere and a daies profit to save the Lands from spoile Bract. lib. 3. fo 137. Prerog Reg. cap. 16. and in continuance of time the King had both the yeere and day and waste Fugitives also were in the same case viz. such as deserted their Countrey either in time of need or such as fled from the triall of Law in criminall cases for in both cases the Saxons accounted them as common felons Neverthelesse the two customes of Gloucester and Kent are saved out of this law by the Statute the first whereof saves the Land to the heire from the Lord and the second saves the same to the heires males or for want of such to the heires females and to the wife her moity untill she be espoused to another man Prerog Reg. cap. 14. Fits 2 E. 2. Tit. Escheat 12. unlesse she shall forfeit the same by fornication during her widdowhood And by the same law also the King had all Escheates of the tenants of Archbshops and Bishops during the vacancy as a perquisite But Escheats of Land and Tenement in Cities or Burroughs the King had them in jure coronae of whomsoever they were holden cap. 25. All weares shall be destroyed but such as are by the Sea coaste The Lieutenant of the Tower of London as it seemed claimed a Lordship in the Thames and by vertue thereof had all the weares to his own use as appeareth by a Charter made to the City of London recited in the second institutes upon this Law and this was to the detriment of the free men especially of the City of London in regard that all free men were to have right of free passage through Rivers as well as through high waies and purprestures in either were equally noxious to the common liberty and therefore that which is set down under the example or instance of the rivers of Thames and Medway contained all the rivers in
further worke to make a man a Knight then his bare tenure for such onely were milites facti who had both Lands sufficient to maintaine the Armes and state of a Knight and also a body fit to undertake the service in his own person and whereof he had given sufficient proofe in the field Others that had Land either had not sufficient maintenance or not habiliments of person and as not expected were laid aside of this sort were many by reason of the late civill warres in which they had much impaired both their bodies and estates This rendred the strength of the Kingdome and Militia so much decayed and the minds of men so weared that they began to love ease before the times would brooke it and a cessation from Arme before they had any mind to peace The Parliament espied the danger how necessary it was for the people to be well armed in these times of generall broile and upon that ground allowed this law to passe that all such as had Lands worth 20 li. yeerly besides reprisals should be ready not to be Knights nor under the favour of others is there any ancient president to warrant it but to finde or to enter the field with the Armes of a Knight or provide some able person to serve in their stead unlesse they were under 21 yeeres of age and so not grown up to full strength of body nor their lands in their own possession but in custody of their Lords or guardians Neverthelesse of such as were grown to full age yet were maimed impotent or of meane estate and tenants by service of a Knight it was had into a way of moderation and ordered that such should pay a reasonable fine for respit of such service nor further as concerning their persons were they bound But as touthing such that were under present onely and not perpetuall disabilities of body upon them incumbent as often as occasion called they served by their deputies or servants all which was grounded not onely upon the law of Henry the second but also upon common right of tenure The armes that these men were to finde are said to be those belonging to a Knight which were partly for defence and partly for offence of the first sort were the Shield the Helmet the Hauberk or Brestplate or coate of maile Of the second sort were the Sword and Lance And unto all a horse must be provided These Armes especially the defensive haue been formerly under alteration for the Brestplate could not be worne with the coate of maile and therefore must be used as occasion was provided of either and for this cause the service of a Knight is called by severall names sometimes from the horse sometimes from the Lance sometimes from the Helmet and not seldome from the coat of maile The power of immediate command or calling forth the Knights to their service in its own nature was but ministeriall and subservient to that power that ordered warre to be leavied and therefore as in the first-Saxon government under their Princes in Germany so after under their Kings Tacitur warre was never resolved upon but if it were defensive it was by the counsell of Lords if offensive by the generall vote of the grand Councell of the Kingdome so by vertue of such order either from the Councell of Lords or grand Councell the Knights were called forth to warre and others as the case required summoned to a rendezvouz and this instumentall power regularly rested in the Lords to whom such service was due and the Lords were summoned by the Lord Paramont as chiefe of the fee of which their tenants were holden and not as King or chiefe Captaine in the field for they were not raised by Proclamation but by summons issued forth to the Sheriffe with distresse and this onely against such as were within his own fee and held of the Crown The King therefore might have many Knights at his command but the Lords more and if those Lords failed in their due correspondency with the King all those of the inferiour orbe were carried away after them so the King is left to shift for himselfe as well as he can and this might be occasioned not onely from their tenures by which they stood obliged to the inferiour Lords but probably much more by their popularity which was more prevalent by how much Kings looked upon the Commons at a further distance in those daies then in after times when the Commons interposed intentively in the publique government And thus the Horsemen of England becomming lesse constant in adhearing to their Soveraigne in the field occasioned Kings to betake themselves to their foot and to forme the strength of their battels wholly in them and themselves on foot to engage with them One point of liberty these Souldiers by tenure had which made their service not altogether servile and that was that their service in the field was neither indefinite nor infinite but circumscribed by place time and end The time of their service for the continuance of it was for a set time if it were at their own charges and although some had a shorter time yet the generall sort were restrained to forty daies For the courage of those times consisted not in wearying and wasting the Souldier in the field by delayes and long worke in wheeling about and retiring but in playing their prizes like two combitants of resolution to get victory by valour or to die If upon extraordinary occasions the warre continued longer then the tenant served upon the pay of the common purse The end of the service of the Tenant viz. their Lords defence in the defence of the Kingdom stinted their work within certain bounds of place beyond which they were not to be drawn unlesse of their own accord and these were the borders of the Dominion of the Crown of England which in those daies extended into Scotland on the North and into a great part of France on the South And therefore the Earle Marshall of England being by Edw. 1. commanded by vertue of his tenure to attend in person upon the Standart under his Lieutenant that then was to be sent into Flanders which was no part of the Dominion of England refused and notwithstanding the Kings threats to hang him yet he persisted saying he would neither goe nor hang. Not onely because the tenants by Knight service are bound to the defence of their Lords persons and not of their Lieutenants but principally because they are to serve for the safety and defence of the Kingdom and therefore ought not to be drawn into forraine Countries Nor did the Earle marshall onely this Walsing fo 69. 71. but many others also both Knights and Knights fellows having twenty pounds per annum for all these with their armes were summoned to serve under the Kings pay in Flanders I say multitudes of them refused to serve and afterwards joyned with the rest of the Commons in a Petition to the
rigged according to the Grecian guize it may be well supposed that there is some consanguinity between the Saxons and the Grecians although the degrees be not known The people were a free people governed by Lawes and those made not after the manner of the Gauls as Caesar noteth by the great men Caes com but by the people and therefore called a free people because they are a Law to themselves and this was a priviledge belonging to all the Germans as Tacitus observeth in cases of most publique consequence de majoribus omnes like unto the manner both of the Athenians and Lacedemonians in their Concio Histor Germ. Plutarch vit Solon Lycurg For which cause also I take the Gauls to be strangers in blood unto the Britons however nigh they were in habitation That some matters of action especially concerning the publique safety were by that generall vote concluded and ordered seemes probable by their manner of meeting with their weapons But such matters as were of lesse concernment the Councell of Lords determined de minoribus Principes Albinus Sax. 72. saith the same Authour Their Countrey they divided into Counties or Circuits all under the government of twelve Lords like the Athenian territory under the Archontes Xenophon These with the other Princes had the judicatory power of distributive justice committed to them Tacit. together with one hundred of the Commons out of each division The election of these Princes with their commission was concluded inter majora by the generall assembly and they executed their commission in circuits like unto the Athenian Heliasticke or Subdiall Court Emius which was rurall and for the most part kept in the open ayre in briefe their judicials were very sutable to the Athenian but their military more like the Lacedemonian whom above all others in their manners they most resembled In their Religion they were very devout saving that they much rested in the reverence they bare to their Priests whom they made the moderator of their generall Assembly their Judge advocate and executioner in Martiall Law therein submitting to them as unto Gods instrument They worship an invisible and an infinite Diety mans flesh is their sacrifice of highest account and as often as they make inquiry by lots they doe it with that solemne reverence as may put all the Christian world to the blush precatus Deos coelumque suspiciens and this done by the Priest of the Town if it be in publique causes or otherwise if private then by the master of the family so as they had family-worship as well as publique These things I note that it may appeare how nigh these invited guests resemble the old Religion of the Britons Avent Anal. Bowr 1.10 Bruter in Tacit. 125. and how probable it is that this Island hath from time to time been no other then as a sewer to empty the superfluity of the German Nations and how the influence of these old principles doth worke in the fundamentall government of this Kingdome to this present day These are the instruments chosen by God and called by the Britaines to be their deliverers from their enemies which they did indeed yet not swayed thereto by love of justice or compassion for if writers say true they were no better then high-way men both by Sea and Land Amian but by their love of spoyle and prey and by the displeasure of God against a dissolute people They professe friendship neverthelesse in their first entrance but espying the weaknesse of the Britons and feeling the strength of the Picts and finding the Land large and good they soone pickt quarrels with their Hoast made peace with the Picts and of fained friends becomming unfained foes to the Britons scattered a poore remnant of Christians some to the furthest corners of the Kingdome others into forraine Nations like so many seedesmen to sow the precious seed of life in a savage soile And those few that remained behind profiting under much misery by their doctrine and good example yeelded better blessings unto their new come guests then they either expected or desired And thus the miseries of poore Britaine became riches of mercy to the North and Easterne people and the ruines here the foundations of many famous Churches elsewhere Nor yet was mercy from the Britons utterly taken away nor their blood drawn out to the last drop or their name quite blotted out of the booke of fame for whereas two things make men miserable viz. the heavinesse of the burthen without and the failing of the heart within and Gods ordinary way of redresse of the former beginneth in taking away the later thus dealt he with the Britons for in danger as want of strength breeds feare and that by extreamity dispaire so dispaire oftentimes revives into a kind of rage that puts strength forth beyond reason I say beyond reason for cause cannot be given thereof other then Gods extraordinary dispensation in a judiciary way when he seeth the stronger to wax insolent over the weaker Thus the Britons fled from the Picts so long as they had any hope of reliefe from the Saxons but being become their enemies and pursuing them to the low water marke that in all reason they must either drinke or bleed their last then their courage revived and by divers victories by the space of 200 yeeres God stopped the hasty conquest of the Saxons the result whereof by truces leagues commerce conversation and marriages between these two Nations declared plainly that it was too late for the Saxons to get all their bounds being predetermined by God and thus declared to the world In all which God taming the Britons pride by the Saxons power and discovering the Saxons darknesse by the Britons light made himselfe Lord over both peoples in the conclusion CHAP. V. Of Austins comming to the Saxons in England his entertainment and worke DUring these troublesome times came a third party that wrought more trouble to this Isle then either Pict or Saxon for it troubled all This was the Canonicall power of the Roman Bishop now called the Universall Bishop For the Roman Empire having removed the Imperiall residence to Constantinople weakned the Westerne part of the Empire and exposed it not onely to the forraine invasions of the Goths Vandals Herules Lombards and other flotes of people that about these times by secret instinct were weary of their owne dwellings but also to the rising power of the Bishop of Rome Naucler 505. and purposely for his advancement Who by patience out rode the stormes of forraine force and tooke advantage of those publique calamitous times to insinuate deeper into the consciences of distressed people that knew no other consolation in a plundred estate but from God and the Bishop who was the chiefe in account amongst them the beauty of the Bishop of Rome thus growing in the West made him to out-reach not onely his owne Diocesse and Province but to minde a kind
discipline Ll. Canut cap. 58. if they followed their rule which was made not by the arbitry of the Generall but by Parliament These amongst other scattered principles concerning Sea-affaires may serve to let us know that the Law-Martiall and that of the Sea were branches of the positive Lawes of the kingdome setled by the generall vote in the Wittagenmot and not left to the will of a lawlesse Generall or Commander so tender and uniforme were those times both in their Laws and liberties CHAP. XXIII Of the government of the Saxon Kingdome in times of peace and first of the division of the Kingdome into shires and their Officers IF the Saxon government was regular in time of warre how much rather in time of peace All great works are done by parcels and degrees and it was the Saxons ancient way in Germany to divide their Territory into severall circuits or circles and to assigne to each their severall Magistrates all of them ruled by one Law like one soule working in severall members to one common good Thus they did here in England having found the Land already divided into severall governments they likewise what they conquered divided into severall parts called Comitatus or Counties from the word Comes that signifies a companion and the Counties thence called are nothing but societies or associations in publique charge and service But the Saxon word is shire or share that is a portion or precinct of ground belonging to this or that person or great Town and bearing the name of that person or Town and sometimes of the scituation of the people as North or South folke East or South Sex or Saxons This division by the names seems to be of Saxon originall and though by the testimony of Ingulfus and other writers Seld. Tit. Hon. it might seem to be done by Alfred yet it will appeare to be more ancient if the reader minde the grant of Peter pence made by King Offa wherein is recorded the severall Diocesses and shires out of which that grant was made under the very same names that they own at this day M. Westm An. 794. and that grant was more ancient then Alfreds time by the space of 80 yeeres Each of these Shires or Counties had their two chiefe Governours for distributive justice of these the Sheriffe was more ancient and worthy Officer being the Lieutenant Sheriffs and ayded by the power of the County in certaine cases for his Commission extended not to leavy warre but to maintain Justice in that County and within the same and in this work he was partly ministeriall and partly judiciall in the one he was the Kings servant to execute his Writs in the other he regulated the Courts of justice under his survey Ll. Edw. c. 35. He was chosen in the County Court called the Folkmote by the votes of the Freeholders and as the King himselfe and the Heretock were intituled to their honour by the peoples favour Coroners The Coroner though in originall later was neverthelesse very ancient he was the more servant or Officer to the King of the two His worke was to enquire upon view of manslaughter and by indictment of all felonies as done contra coronam which formerly were onely contra pacem and triable onely by appeale Miror cap. 1. Sec. 13. As also he was to inquire of all escheates and forfeitures and them to seize He was also to receive appeales of Felonies and to keep the rolls of the Crown pleas within the County It s evident he was an Officer in Alfreds time Miror p. 300. for that King put a Judge to death for sentencing one to suffer death upon the Coroners record without allowing the delinquent liberty of traverse This Officer also was made by election of the Freeholders in their County Court as the Sheriffe was Fits N. Br. 163 164. and from amongst the men of chiefest ranke in the County and sworn in their presence but the Kings Writ lead the worke CHAP. XXIV Of the County Court and the Sheriffs Torne THe government of the County in times of peace consisted much in the administration of justice which was done in the publique meetings of the Freeholders their meetings were either in one place or in severall parts of the County in each of which the Sheriff had the mannaging of the acts done there Folkmote or County court The meeting of the Freemen in one place was called the Folkmote by the Saxons saving the judgement of the honourable reporter Coke instit 2. p. 69. and of latter times the County court the work wherein was partly for consultation direction concerning the ordering of the County for the safety and peace thereof such as were redresse of grievances election of Officers prevention of dangers c. and partly it was Judiciall Miror p. 147. in hearing and determining the common pleas of the County the Church affaires and some trespasses done therein but not matters criminall for the Bishop was Judge therein together with the Sheriffe and by the Canon he was not to intermeddle in matters of blood yet neither was the Bishops nor Sheriffs worke in that Court other then directory or declaratory for the Free-men were Judges of the fact and the other did but edocere jura populo Ll. Canut Miror cap. 1. Sec. 15. yet in speciall cases upon petition a Commission issued forth from the King to certaine Judges of Oier to joyn with the others in the hearing and determining of such particular eases Miror cap. 5. Sec. 1. But in case of injustice or errour the party grieved had liberty of appeale to the Kings Justice Nor did the Common pleas originally commence in the County court Ll. Canut Ll. Edgar unlesse the parties dwelt in severall Liberties or Hundreds in the same County and in case any mistake were in the commencing of suits in that Court which ought not to be upon complaint the Kings Writ reduced it to its proper place and in this also the Kings own Court had no preeminence Concil Brit. p. 197. tit 22. In those ancient times this County court was to be holden but twice a yeere by the constitution of King Edgar but upon urgent emergencies oftner and that either by the Kings especiall Writ Ll. Edw. cap. 35 or if the emergent occasions were sudden and important by extraordinary summons of ringing the Moot-bels Unto this Court all the free men of the County assembled to learne the Law to administer justice Ll. Edw. cap. 35 to provide remedy for publique inconvenience and to doe their fealty to the King before the Bishop and Sheriffe upon oath and in the worke of administring justice Ll. Edw. cap. 4. causes concerning the Church must have the precedency so as yet the Canon law had not gotten footing in England The other Court wherein the Sheriffe had the directory was in the meeting of the free men in severall
the Germans It s true the words of the same Historian have misled some the words are Haeredes tamen successores cuique Liberi these taken collectively I grant may import somewhat tending that way but they may as properly be taken disjunctively that the children inherite by course and if none such were then the brothers if they failed then the unkles And it s not onely evident that in the publique succession to the Crown they had an eye this way but in the descent of private and particular estates as by many instances out of those old Histories may appeare and had any other custome been generall Alfreds rule by Moses Law had never succeeded nor could that other custome hold out against the constant desire of the Saxons to perpetuate their families in greatnesse and honour all which besides the expresse laws set forth in the Codes are in my conceit sufficient to induce an historicall faith that the generall course of descent was to the eldest sons and not to all joyntly Neverthelesse out of this estate of inheritance divers particular estates were created as well by common custome as by the especiall act of the owner of such estate Such of them as were wrought by custome was occasioned from marriage whereby if the man was setled of such estate as formerly hath been recited and died Dower his wife surviving by ancient custome she had her dower or third part of such estate of inheritance This custome though ancient yet was not originally from the Germans but from the Latines who used to give dower with the man Plut. vit Solon Apotheg Lacon and receive portion with the woman But the Germans learned from the Greeks otherwise for the Laws both of Solon and Lycurgus forbad the latter lest marriages should be made for reward and not grounded upon affection which as they conceived would be a means to maintaine the strength of mankind in generation And therefore Tacitus noteth this by way of Antithesis Dotemnon uxor marito sed uxori maritus offert The dower that was given in the first times was goods and these were utensiles for warre And the wife many times returned to the man tokens of her love in the same kind and not as gages of future maintenance unlesse we shall account warre their proper calling from whence their livelihood issued Succeeding times growing more calme changed the custome of fighting into trading and taught them to preferre the stock gotten by commerce before that of warre and so the dower was changed This course continued all the Saxons time for ought I can finde for not much above threescore yeeres before the conquest it was by a publique law confirmed Ll. Sax. Lamb. Edm. fo 76. that the Bridegroome before marriage should set forth that portion of goods that should be his wifes Ll. Sax. 50. Reg. 22. and these were ever afterward holden her own proper goods But if no such provision was made before marriage then the law or custome gave the wife halfe her husbands goods if she outlived him and if there were children then the whole estate in goods to provide for her selfe and them untill she tooke a second husband but if the husband suffered death as a malefactor the wife was to have but one third part Ll Sax. Lam. fo 14. Ll. Inae cap. 58 I finde no footsteps of Dower in Lands untill the Normans time who were also as well owners of the wifes personall estate as of their persons and before which time the Saxon wives in divers regards were more absolute and independant I say not more happy because they were never one with their husbands nor were they ever under the Law of free pledge as wives nor was the husband his wifes pledge as he was her husband although as a master he was free pledge for his servants for the Law was that in case the husband carried his wife away into another Lordship Ll. Edm. Lamb cap. 7. as he must give pledges that his wife shall have no wrong so she must give pledge by her friends that she shall do no wrong and she passed therefore as an appurtenant to her husband then in unity with him and her estate or portion was rather appurtenant to her then him for if she failed in her good carriage to her husband she was to make amends out of her own estate to her husband and if her estate sufficed not then her pledges were to satisfie the husband Ll. Sax. 50. Reg. 22. Neverthelesse what failed in the relation of the woman to the man was supplied in the relation of the man to the woman for besides the respect the men bare to the women as their wives they honoured them as German women that admired valour in all Idolized it in their husbands and shared in it themselves and upon occasion merited thereby not onely to be companions in honour but triumphers above men ye their Commanders and governours Nor was this the originall trick of the rude and uncompt Germans or Barbarous Britons but of the wise Greeks and received as may be supposed from the Lacedemonians upon as good ground as the wise of Leonidas the Lacedemonian King rendred who being asked why the Lacedemonian women ruled their husbands It s true said she Curtesie of England for we onely know how to obey our husbands A second particular estate which the Law derived out of the inheritance was advancement to the husband for the Saxons were not so stupid as to refuce favour proferred and therefore they made a law of Counter-tenure to that of Dower which we commonly call tenure by the curtesie of England which was but a perquisite of the wives estate given to the husband in case he over lived his wife and had issue by her born alive The name was probably given by the Normans who as it seemeth had no such custome and therefore they gave it the name from the English albeit since that time Scotland hath also allowed it amongst them who might probably bring it into this Kingdome or Country amongst the mingled people Ll. Alm. tit 92. Lindenbr cod for this custome or law is found amongst the ancient Almain laws differing onely from the law this day in the evidence of the title which now ariseth upon the birth of the child heard to cry when as in those daies the title vested not unlesse the child opened his eyes ut possit videre culmen domus quatuor parietes which toucheth not onely the opening of the eye but also the rowling of it about Estates that were derived out of the estate of an inheritance by the act of the party Estate taile either were such as concerned the whole inheritance or part thereof That which concerned the whole inheritance was nothing but a parcelling of it out according to the will of the giver and this was afterwards called estate Taile which passed also amongst some places by way of custome Ll.
the worke in hand to disclaime that custome which must needs be of infinite consequence in the effecting of what was principally sought after viz. the union of the two peoples Normans and Saxons into one I say it was principally sought after by the Norman conquerour if not led thereto by his own genius yet necessitated thereto by force of reason of state as shall appeare hereafter And what could be imagined a more ready way to stay the effusion of blood and all other unhappy events of enmity then by taking away enmity it selfe or a more speedy and certaine course for union then to reduce the men and women of each people to mutuall society and to seale up all by a lasting bond of marriage or greater encouragement for the comfortable proceedings therein then the setling of the constant maintenance of the wife in case of survivorship by the law of dower of the Lands and Tenements of the Husband Lindenbrog Concil Aenham c. 19. Ll. Edm. which was so full of contingencies and uncertainties in the portion of goods that was by the Saxon law appointed to the wife in such case Nor was this all for by marriage thus made to the Normans they had a great hold not so much over the English as in the English and that not onely during coverture but by reason of this title of Dower the women became tenants and under the Lords wing so as they durst not willingly and illegally offend their Lord in their widdowhood nor by law nor reason match themselves and their dowry to any other that was not first allowed by the Lord to be in friendship with him and thus became the tenants widdows to be at the liking of the Lord for their marriage and the like hereto may be said concerning the husband in case of tenant by the curtesie Miror fo 20. and however by the Norman former practise it was much disturbed yet by Henry the first it was again reduced to its former right rather then originall arising from his grant as some hold and proved advantagious for the ends aforesaid Now as touching their marriage portion of goods because the Saxon law had already endowed them thereof they could not be induced to lay down their known ancient right till they found the new law of dower to settle and so for some time both laws were in force untill the more ancient Saxon law had an honourable buriall Neverthelesse for the present the law abridged that right so farre as to limit it to the widdow during widdowhood according to the former Saxon law Upon consideration of all which it may well be conceived that the power of the Lords in consenting or dissenting to the marriages of their tenants widdows and wards was not so much an usurpation upon the common right of the English subjects as a custome rationally and with great wisdome as the course of affaires then stood upholden and allowed amongst them principally for the speedy setling of a peaceable government and consolidating of two Nations into one and wherein England was then so happy as to come to a conclusion in seven yeeres which cost their ancestors nigh two hundred yeeres experience with the Britons besides a world of bloodshed that might have been spared ere they could finde out the right way to a desired peace by mutuall marriages had between them cap. 4. 4. Wardship Such widdow shall have the custody of the Lands of such children or otherwise such other person as by right ought to have the same This is the first news of Wardships that passed abroad cum privilegio of a received Law which together with the former declare the right custome of the Normans M. Paris and thereby the injustas consuetudines quibus Angliae regnum opprimebatur viz. Arbitrary reliefe taken of the Tenants estate arbitrary marriages made of their persons and arbitrary grants of guardianship of their lands for as yet oppression was not so high flown as to cast the government of the persons of their Wards out of the view of the Lords provisionary care upon adventure of the next inlaw whether man or woman wise or unwife under pretence to train him up in military service fit for the Lords own safety and the Kingdomes lifeguard but it was the proper ground of the Lords own seisure and right of wardship he being looked upon by the eye of common reason as the onely meet man that both could and would effect that worke so as might be most advantagious to the publique which seemed to be chiefly concerned herein and upon the same generall ground the survey of fooles accompanied the former albeit it was not in practise till Henry the first brought it in as the Mirror of justice saith fo 258. Ll. Canut 37. yet it came upon an ancient foundation laid in the time of the Danes For my own part I will not dispute the point whether this custome of Wardship was purely Norman or whether it was derived from the Saxons anciently who possibly might have some respect to Orphans in such cases to traine them up for the publique service in point of war especially being possessors of a known right of reliefe as well as Alfred the Saxon King did undertake the worke for the training of some such particular persons in learning for the service of the publique Asser Menev. in time of peace and civill government yet thus much appeareth that guardianship of Lands was a known custome enough to make and maintaine a right and that it by law was a right belonging to some persons before others and that this had been a custome before the former unjust customs crept into government of the Conquerour and principally of his sonne Rufus and though it be questionable whether it setled first upon the Normans or the English yet its manifest that if one people had it the other people now comming into union with that people could not in reason except against that custome which the other people had taken up upon so honorable grounds as reason of State which as the times then were was evident and superlative especially the customes being under the regulating of Law and not of any arbitrary power and can be no presidents of the reliefe marriage and wardship that after ages usurped Tenants in Knights service shall hold their Lands cap. 5. c. acquitted of all taxes 5. Acquittall that they may be more able to provide Armes and be more ready and fit for the Kings service and defence of the Kingdome This law whither it be a renewing of a former custome or an introduction of a new Law it s cleare it was upon an old ground That Tenants by Knight service must be ready for the service of their Lord and defence of the kingdome whereof afterwards But the law is that these men shall hold their lands of that tenure acquitted of all taxes though legally imposed upon the body of the Kingdome which must be
as foure yeeres for within that time Richard Lucy one of the Justices had renounced his Office and betaken himselfe to a cloister and yet was neither named in the first commission nor in the latter nor did the last commission continue five yeers Hoved. An. 1184. for within that time Ralph Glanvile removed from the Northerne circuit to that of Worcester as by the story of Sir Gilbert Plumpton may appeare though little to the honour of the justice of the Kingdome or of that Judge however his book commended him to posterity I take it upon the credit of the reporter Co. jurisd c. 33 that this Itinerary judicature was setled to hold every seven yeeres but I finde no monument thereof before these daies As touching their power certainly it was in point of judicature as large as that of the court of Lords though not so high it was as large because they had cognisance of all causes both concerning the Crown and common pleas and amongst those of the Crown this onely I shall note that all manner of falshood was inquirable by those Judges which after came to be much invaded by the Clergy Hoveden Glanvil l. 14. c. 7. I shall say no more of this but that in their originall these Iters were little other then visitations of the Countrey by the grand Councell of Lords Nor shall I adde any thing concerning the Vicontiel courts and other inferiour but what I finde in Glanvile that though robbery belonged to the Kings court Glanv lib. 1. cap. 2. yet thefts belonged to the Sheriffs Court and if the Lords court intercepts not all batteries and woundings unlesse in the complaint they be charged to be done contra pacem Domini Regis the like also of inferiour trespasses Idem lib. 9. 10. besides common pleas whereof more shall follow in the next Chapter as occasion shall be CHAP. LXII Of certaine Laws of Iudicature in the time of Henry the second ANd hereof I shall note onely a few as well touching matters of the Crown as of property being desirous to observe the changes of Law with the times and the manner of the growth thereof to that pitch which in these times it hath attained We cannot finde in any story that the Saxon Church was infested with any Heresie from their first entrance till this present generation The first and last Heresie 1. Heresie that ever troubled this Island was inbred by Pelagius but that was amongst the Britons and was first battered by the Councell or Synod under Germanus but afterwards suppressed by the zeale of the Saxons who liked nothing of the Brittish breed and for whose sake it suffered more happly then for the foulnesse of the opinion The Saxon church leavened from Rome for the space of above five hundred yeeres held on its course without any intermission by crosse doctrine springing up Hoved. 585. till the time of Henry the second Then entred a sect whom they called Publicans but were the Albigenses as may appeare by the decree of Pope Alexander whose opinions I shall not trouble my course with but it seems they were such as crossed their way and Henry the second made the first president of punishing Heresie in this Kingdome unders the name of this Sect whom he caused to be brought before a councell of Bishops Nubrig l. 2. cap. 13. who endeavoured to convince them of their errour but failing therein they pronounced them Hereticks and delivered them over to the Lay power by which means they were branded in the forehead whipped and exposed to extremity of the cold according to the decree of the Church died Decret Papae Alexand. Hoveden 585. This was the manner and punishment of Hereticks in this Kingdome in those daies albeit it seemeth they were then decreed to be burnt in other countries if that relation of Cogshall be true which Picardus noteth upon the 13 chapter of the History of William of Newberry out of which I have incerted this relation Another case we meet with in Henry the seconds time concerning Apostacy 2. Apostacy Bracton lib. 3. cap. 9. which was a crime that as it seems died as soon as it was born for besides that one we finde no second thereto in all the file of English story The particular was that a Clerke had renounced his baptisme and turned Jew and for this was convicted by a councell of Bishops at Oxford and was burned So as we have Apostacy punished with death and Heresie with a punishment that proved mortall and the manner of conviction of both by a councell of the Clergy and delivered over to the Lay power who certainly proceeded according to the direction of the Canon or advice of the councell These if no more were sufficient to demonstrate the growing power of the Clergy however brave the King was against all his enemies in the field Treason 3. Treason was anciently used onely as a crime of breach of trust or fealty as hath been already noted now it grows into a sadder temper and is made all one with that of laesa Majestas and that Majesty that now a daies is wrapped up wholly in the person of the King was in Henry the seconds time imparted to the King and Kingdom as in the first times it was more related to the Kingdome And therefore Glanvile in his booke of laws speaking of the wound of Majesty exemplifies sedition and destruction of the Kingdome to be in equall degree a Lib. 1. cap. 2. wound of Majesty Lib. 10. cap. 1. with the destruction of the person of the King and then he nameth sedition in the Army and fraudulent conversion of Treasure trove which properly belongs to the King All which he saith are punished with death and forfeiture of estate and corruption of blood for so I take the meaning of the words in relation to what ensueth Fellonies 4. Felonies of Manslaughter Burning Robbery Ravishment and Fausonry are to be punished with losse of member and estate This was the law derived from the Normans and accordingly was the direction in the charge given to the Justices itinerant in Henry the seconds time as appeareth in Hoveden But treason or treachery against the oath fealty Ll. Hen. 1. c. 25. or bond of allegiance as of the servants against the Lord was punished with certaine and with painfull deaths and therefore though the murther of the King was treason yet the murder of his sonne was no other then as of another man unlesse it arose from those of his own servants Ll. Hen. 1. c. 79 The penalty of losse of estate was common both to Treason and Felony it reached even unto Thefts in which case the forfeiture as to the moveables Glanvil lib. 7. cap. 17. was to the Sheriffe of the County unto whose cognisance the case did belong and the land went to the Lord immediately and not to the King But in all cases of Felony of
the higher nature the party though not the Kings tenant lost his personal estate to the King for ever his free holds also for a yeere and a day after which they returned to the Lord of the soile by way of escheat It seemeth also that the losse not onely of chattels and goods but also of lands c. extended to Outlaries I conceive in case of Felony and the Kings pardon in such case could not bind the Lords right of escheate although it might discharge the goods and the yeere and the day whereunto the King was entituled which case alone sufficiently declareth what power Kings had in the estates of their subjects Manslaughter 5. Manslaughter made not bailable This was law in Henry the seconds time although it crossed the Norman Law Glanvil l. 14. cap. 1 3. and questionlesse it was upon good ground for the times now were not as those in the Conquerours times when shedding of blood was accounted valour and in most cases in order to the publique service And now it seems it was a growing evill and that cried so loud as though in case of Treason baile might be allowed yet not in this case ubi ad terrorem aliter statutum est saith the authour Robbers 6. Robbery shall be committed to the Sheriffe or in his absence to the next Castelane who shall deliver him to the Sheriffe And the Justices shall doe right to them and unto trespassers upon Land Ll. Gul. 4. Spicil 174. By the Conquerours law these offenders were bailable and I conceive this was no repeale thereof and the rather because Glanvile alloweth of pledges in all cases except Manslaughter yea in those crimes that did wound Majesty it selfe Glanvil lib. 14. cap. 1. although they concerne the destruction of the Kings person or sedition in the Kingdome or Army thereof The Justices herein mentioned were intended to be the Justices itinerant and the trespasses upon Land are meant such as are contra pacem Domini Regis as riotous and forcible entries for some trespasses were against the peace of the Sheriffe as formerly hath been observed Fauxonry 7. Fauxonry Glanvil lib. 14 cap. 7. is of severall degrees or kinds some against the King others against other men and of those against the King some are punished as wounds of Majesty as falsifying the Kings charter and whether falsifying of money were in that condition or not I leave or falsifying of measures yet more inferiour I cannot determine but its cleare by Glanvile that falsifying of the deed of a private person was of smaller consideration and at the utmost deserved but losse of member Inheritances may not be aliened 8. Glanvil lib. 7. cap. 1. Ibid. c. 5. Inheritances were in those times of lands or goods for it was the custome then that the personall estate the debts deducted was divisible into three parts one whereof belonged in right to the wife as her reasonable part the other to the heire and third to the testator to make his will of them and of the other two parts he could not dispose by will Concerning Lands it was regularly true that no man could alien his whole inheritance to the disherisin of his heire either by act in his life time or any part thereof by his last will without the concurrance of the heire But of purchased lands he may give part by act executed in his life time though he have no Lands by inheritance and if he hath no issue then he may alien all And where a man hath Lands by inheritance and also by purchase he may alien all his purchased lands as he pleaseth If the lands be holden in Gavel kinde no more of the inheritance can be conveyed to any of the children then their proportionable parts will amount unto This law of inheritance was divers according to the tenure for the lands in Knight-service alwaies discended to the heire but such as were holden in soccage passed according to the custome either to the eldest or to the youngest or to all equally And thus stood the generall state of inheritance from the Normans times hitherto Ll. Hen 1. c. 88. seeming somewhat too strait for the free men that by law of property might challenge a power to doe with their own as they pleased But the Normans saw a double prejudice herein the first was the danger of ruine of many of their families who now ingrafted into the English stocke and yet not fully one might expect a late checke to their preferments from the Saxon parents after a long and faire semblance made of their good will The second prejudice was the decay of their Militia which was maintained by riches more then by multitude of men partly because that rich men are most fearfull of offending and therefore ordinarily are most serviceable both with their bodies and estates against publique dangers and partly because by their friends and allies they bring more ayd unto the publique by ingaging them in the common cause that otherwise might prove unsensible of the condition of their Country The heire of a free man shall by descent be in such seism as 9. his ancester had at the time of his death Vide Glanv l. 7. c 9. doing service and paying releif and shall have his chattailes If the heire be under age the Lord shall have the Wardship for the due time and the wife her Dower and part of the goods If the Lord withhold seisin the Kings Justice shall trie the matter by twelve men The first of these branches is declaratory of a ground of common law but being applied to the last is an introduction of a new law of triall of the heires right by Assize of Mortdancester where formerly no remedy was left to the heire but a Writ of right If these three branches be particularly observed they speake of three sorts of heires of tenants by Knight-service viz. such as are majors or of full age and such as are minors or under age and such as are of a doubtfull age Those that are of full age at the death of their ancestors may possesse the lands descended and the Lord may not disseise him thereof but may be resisted by the heire in the maintenance of his possession so as he be ready to pay reliefe and doe service that is due and if the Lord expell him he shall have remedy by Assize Those heires that are minors shall be under the Lords guardianship till they come to one and twenty yeeres Tbe heires of such as hold by soccage are said to be at full age at fifteene yeeres because at that age they were thought able to doe that service but the sonnes of Burgesses are then said to be of full age when they have ability to mannage their fathers calling such as telling of money measuring of cloath and the like yet doth not Glanvile or any other say that these were their full age to all purposes albeit that some Burroughs at
this day hold the last in custome to all intents whatsoever The last branch provideth the remedy to recover to the heire his possession in case it be detained either through doubtfulnesse of age of the heire or his title and it directs the issue to be tried by twelve men This triall some have thought to be of Glanvils invention and it may well be that this triall of this matter as thus set down was directed by him yet he useth often in his booke the word solet and in his preface saith that he will set down frequentius usitata and its past question but that the triall by twelve men was much more ancient as hath been already noted One thing more yet remaineth concerning the widdow of the tenant whose dower is not onely provided for but her reasonable part of her husbands personall estate The originall hereof was from the Normans and it was as popular as that of Wardships was Regall and so they made the English women as sure to them as they were sure of their children The Justices shall by Assize try disseisins done since the Kings 10. comming over Sea next after the peace made between him and his sonne This is called the Assize of Novel disseisin or of disseisins lately made It seems that the limitation was set for the Justices sake who now were appointed to that worke which formerly belonged to the County courts Glanv lib. 13. cap. 33. and to prevent intrenchments of Courts a limitation was determined although the copy seemeth to be mistaken for the limitation in the writ is from the Kings last voyage or going into Normandy Justices shall doe right upon the Kings writ for halfe a 11. Knights fee and under unlesse in cases of difficulty which are to be referred to the King The Justices itinerant ended the smaller matters in their circuits the other were reserved to the King in his bench Justices shall inquire of Escheates Lands Churches and 12. women in the Kings gift And of Castle guard who how much and where So as the Judges itinerant had the worke of Escheators and made their circuits serve as well for the Kings profit as Justice to the subjects They used also to take fealty of the people to the King at one certaine time of the yeere and to demand homage also These matters of the Kings Exchequer made the presence of the Judges lesse acceptable and it may be occasioned some kind of oppression And as touching Castleguard it was a tenure in great use in these bloody times and yet it seemeth they used to take rent instead of the personall service else had that enquiry how much been improper 13. Of a tenants holding and of severall Lords That one man may hold severall lands of severall Lords and so owe service to them all is so common as nothing can be more neverthelesse it will not be altogether out of the way to touch somewhat upon the nature of this mutuall relation between Lord and Tenant in generall that the true nature of the diversity may more fully appeare The foundation or subject of service was a piece of land or other tenement at the first given by the Lord to the Tenant in affirmance of a stipulation between them presupposed by the giving and receiving whereof the tenant undertooke to performe service to the Lord Glanv lib. 9. cap. 4. and the Lord undertooke protection of the tenant in his right to that tenement The service was first by promise solemnly bound either by oath which the Lord or his deputy by the common law hath power to administer as in the case of fealty in which the tenant bound himselfe to be true to the honour and safety of his Lords person and to perform the service due to the Lord for the tenement so given or otherwise by the tenants humble acknowledgement and promise not onely to performe the services due but even to be devoted to the Lords service to honour him and to adventure limbe and life and to be true and faithfull to the Lord. This is called Homage from those words I become your man Sir and yet promiseth upon the matter no more but fealty in a deeper complement albeit there be difference in the adjuncts belonging to each For though it be true that by promise of being the Lords man a generall service may seem to be implied yet in regard that it is upon occasion onely of that present tenure it seemeth to me that it is to be restrained onely to those particular services which belong to that tenement and therefore if that tenement be holden in soccage although the tenant be bound to homage yet that homage ties not the tenant to the service of a Knight Lit. lib. 2. cap. 5 nor contrarily doth the homage of a tenant in Knight service tie him to that of socage upon the command of his Lord though he professeth himselfe to be his man Nor doth the tenants homage binde him against all men nor ad semper for in case he holdeth of two or divers Lords by homage for severall tenements Glanv lib. 9. cap. 1. Lib. 7. cap. 10. and these two Lords be in warre one against the other the tenant must serve his chiefe Lord of whom the capitall house is holden or that Lord which was his by priority who may be called the chiefe Lord because having first received homage he received it absolutely from his tenant but all other Lords receive homage of such tenant with a saving of the tenants faith made to other Lords and to the King who in order to the publique had power to command a tenant into warre against his own Lord. If therefore he be commanded by the King in such cases unto warre he need not question the point of forfeiture Glanvil lib. 9. cap. 1. but if he be commanded by a chiefe of his other Lords into warre against a party in which another of his Lords is engaged his safest way is to enter upon the worke because of his allegiancc to that Lord yet with a salvo of his fealty to that other Lord. Ibid. cap. 4. But in all ordinary cases tenants and Lords must have regard to their stipulation for otherwise if either breake the other is discharged for ever and if the fault be in the tenant his tenement escheats to his Lord and if the Lord faile he loses his tenure and the tenant might thence forth disclaime and hold over for ever Neverthelesse the Lords had two priviledges by common custome belonging to their tenures which although not mentioned in the stipulation were yet more valuable then all the rest the one concerning matter of profit the other of power That of profit consisted in ayds and reliefe The ayds were of three kinds Ibid. c. 8. one to make the Lords eldest sonne Knight the other to marry his eldest daughter the third to helpe him to pay a reliefe to his Lord Paramont which in my opinion
sounds as much as if the tenants were bound by their tenures to ayd their Lord in all cases of extraordinary charge saving that the Lord could not distraine his tenant for ayd to his warre and this according to the Lords discretion Ibid. for Glanvile Glanv l. 9. c. 8 saith that the law determined nothing concerning the quantity or valew of these ayds These were the Norman waies and savoured so much of Lordship that within that age they were regulated But that of reliefes was an ancient sacrifice as of first fruits of the tenement to the Lord in memoriall of the first Lords favour in conferring that tenement Ibid. and it was first setled in the Saxons time The Lords priviledge of power extended so farre as to distraine his tenants into his own Court to answer to himselfe in all causes that concerned his right and so the Lord became both Judge and party which was soon felt and prevented as shall appeare hereafter Another priviledge of the Lords power was over the tenants heire after the tenants death in the disposing of the body during the minority and marriage of the same As touching the disposing of the body the Lord either retained the same in his own power Glanv 7.10 or committed the same to others and this was done either pleno jure or rendring an account Ibid. c. 12. As concerning the marriage of the females that are heires or so apparent the parents in their life time cannot marry them without the Lords consent nor may they marry themselves after their parents death without the same and the Lords are bound to give their consent unlesse they can shew cause to the contrary The like also of the tenants widdows that have any dowry in the lands of such tenure And by such like means as these the power of the Barons grew to that height that in the lump it was too massie both for Prince and Commons 14. Of the power of the last Will. It is a received opinion that at the common law no man could devise his lands by his last will If thereby it be conceived to be against common reason I shall not touch that but if against custome of the ancient times I must suspend my concurrence therewith untill those ancient times be defined for as yet I finde no testimony sufficient to assert that opinion but rather that the times hitherto had a sacred opinion of the last will as of the most serious sincere and advised declaration of the most inward desires of a man which was the main thing looked unto in all conveyances Voluntas donatoris de cetero observetur And therefore nothing was more ordinary then for Kings in these times as much as in them did lie to dispose of their Crowns by their last Will. M. Paris An. 1216. Hoveden An. 1199. Malmsb. nov l. 1. Malmsb. l. 3. Thus King John appointed Henry the third his successor and Richard the first devised the Crown to King John and Henry the first gave all his lands to his daughter and William the Conquerour by his last will gave Normandy to Robert England to William and to Henry his mothers lands If then things of greatest moment under Heaven were ordinarily disposed by the last Will was it then probable that the smaller free holds should be of too high esteem to be credited to such conveyances I would not be mistaken as if I thought that Crowns and Empires were at the disposall of the last will of the possessour nor doe I thinke that either they were thus in this Kingdome or that there is any reason that can patronize that opinion yet it will be apparent that Kings had no sleight conceit of the last will and knew no such infirmity in that manner of conveyance as is pretended or else would they never have spent that little breath left them in vaine Glanvil l. 7. cap. 1 5. I have observed the words of Glanvile concerning this point and I cannot finde that he positively denieth all conveyance of land by Will but onely in case of disherison the ground whereof is because its contrary to the conveyance of the law and yet in that case also alloweth of a disposing power by consent of the heire which could never make good conveyance if the will in that case were absolutely voide and therefore his authority lies not in the way Nor doth the particular customes of places discountenance but rather advance this opinion for if devise of lands were incident to the tenure in Gavell kind and that so generall in old time as also to the burgage tenures Ll. Gulielm cap. 61. which were the rules of Corporation and Cities Vbi leges Angliae deperiri non possunt nec defraudari nec violari how can it be said contrary to the common law And therefore those conveyances of lands by last will that were in and after these times holden in use seem to me rather remnants of the more generall custome wasted by positive lawes then particular customes growing up against the common rule It s true that the Clergy put a power into the Pope to alter the law M. Paris An. 1181. Hoved An. 1181. Decret Alex. pap Hoveden fo 587. as touching themselves in some cases for Roger Archbishop of Yorke procured a faculty from the Pope to ordaine that no Ecclesiasticall persons Will should be good unlesse made in health and not lying in extremity and that in such cases the Archbishop should possesse himselfe of all such parties goods but as it lasted not long so was himselfe made a president in the case for being overtaken with death ere he was provided he made his will in his sicknesse and Henry the second possessed himselfe of his estate And it s as true that Femme coverts in these daies could make no will of their reasonable part Glanv l. 7. cap. 5 16. because by the Saxon law it belonged joyntly to the children Nor could usurers continuing in that course at the time of their death make their will because their personall estate belonged to the King after their death and their lands to their Lords by escheate although before death they lie open to no censure of law but this was by an especiall law made since the Conquerours time for by the Saxon law they were reputed as outlaws Neverthelesse all these doe but strengthen the generall rule Ll. Edw. 37. viz. that regularly the last will was holden in the generall a good conveyance in law If the will were onely intended and not perfected or no will was made then the lands passed by descent and the goods held course according to the Saxon law Glanv l. 7. c. 6. cap. 8. viz. the next kinsmen and friends of the intestate did administer and as administrators they might sue by Writ out of the Kings court although the Clergy had now obtained so much power as for the recovery of a legacy or for the determining
Charter and other Statutes during the reignes of these Kings SHattered asunder by broiles of Civill wars the free men having laid aside that regard of the ancient mutuall covenant and bond of Decenners are now become weake and almost inthralled to the lust of Kings Lords Pope and English Clergy and therefore it s no wonder if taxes and tributes were many and new although most of them deserved not to march under any banner but the colours of oppression nor did any thing save them from the worst tenure of all but the severall interests of those superiour powers which oftentimes did justle with one another and thereby gave the Commons liberty to take breath so as though for the present they lost ground and hunted upon a coole sent yet they still retained the prey within their view Sometimes they were cast farre behind other times they recovered themselves a truce is cried and laws are made to moderate all and determine the bounds of every one and thus comes the grand Charter into the Publique Theater The Historian saith it was the same with that of King Johns framing and yet by comparing them together we finde them disagreeing both in words and sence and therefore shall sum the same up as shortly as I can observing the difference of the two Charters as I passe along The first Chapter concerned the Church of which sufficient hath been spoken Mag. carta The Free men shall enjoy these liberties to them and their heires for ever cap. 2. The heire in Knightservice shall pay the ancient reliefe cap. 3. That reliefes were setled by the Saxons hath been already shewed and also that they were continued and confirmed by Henry the first onely in those times they were payed in Horses Armes c. but in after times all was turned into money which was more beneficiall for all cap. 4. Vide Stat. de Wardis 28 E. 1 Lords shall have their Wards bodies and Lands after homage received untill the full age though the Ward be formerly Knighted Glanvil lib 6. cap. 1. 4. The Law of Wardship may seem more anciently seated in this Kingdome then the Normans times for if the Statutes of Scotland beare any credit that Law was in Scotland before those times The Lords were not to have the Wardship before they were possessed of the tenure because it was theirs as a fruit of the tenure according to the Saxon law concerning distresse that it could not be in the power of the Lord to distraine till he was possessed of the service Stat. Marlbr cap. 6 7. And if by fraudulent conveyance the heire did hold the Lord out of possession a Writ of Ward did lie against him and if he did not appeare the Lord might seise the Lands unlesse in case of Wardship per cause de guard Stat. Marlbr cap. 16. prerog Reg. cap. 3. And in case the Lord would hold the Wardship longer then the full age of the heire an Assize did lie against the Lord for the heire could not enter without livery But if the heire were of full age at the time of the ancestors death the Lord could not enter the Lands and yet he should have a reliefe and the primer seisin And if the heire entered the Lands before homage done he gained no free hold Prerog Reg. cap. 13. though he were Knighted before as this Law provideth for it may seem that these times of civill warre brought forth a tricke of Knighting betimes as an honourable encouragement for young sparks to enter the field before they were compleat men of discretion to know whether the cause of warre was good or evill and yet reason might induce a conceit that he that was thought meet to doe Knight service in his own person might expect the maintenance fit for the ability of the person and honour of the service Grantees or their assignes or Committees of Wardships shall preserve the Land c. from waste cap. 5. and the tenants from extortion They shall yeeld up the same stocked if they receive them stocked cap. 6. The first of these is the law of common reason for its contrary to guardianship to destroy that which by their office they ought to preserve As touching the words of the Law the Grantees are omitted in the Charter of King John and also their assignees albeit that doubtlesse they were within the intent and meaning of the Law The matter declares plainly not onely the oppession of Lords upon their Wards but also the corruption even of the law it selfe that at the first aimed at the good of the publique and honour of Knightservice but now was degenerated into the base desire of profit by making market of the Wards estates and marriages that brought in strip and wast of Estates and niggardly neglect of the education and training up of the persons of the Wards and an imbasing of the generation of mankind and spoile of times Nor did these times ever espie or provide against the worst of these but onely endeavoured to save the estate by punishing the wasters in dammages by this law and by forfaiture of the Wardship by a Law made in the time of Edward the first Stat. Gloc. cap. 5. and this as well for waste done during the time of the custody as in the life time of his ancestors by another law in Edward the firsts time Stat. de vasto 20 E. 1. And because the Escheators and their under Officers used to serve themselves out of the estates of minors before they certified to the King his right and those were not within the Law of Magna Carta or at least not so reputed Artic. sup cart cap. 18. It was therefore afterwards provided that these also should render dammages in a Writ of wast to be brought against them The marriage of Wards shall be without disparagement cap. 7. It was an ancient law amongst the Germans and the Saxons brought it hither Tacitus mor. Germ. and as a Law setled it that marriage must be amongst equals but the Danes and Normans sleighted it and yet it continued and was revived Now as the Lord had the tuition of the Ward instead of the ancester so had he the care of the marriage in such manner as the ancester might have had if he had lived For in case the Ward were stolne and married the delinquent suffered fine and imprisonment Or if the ward married without the Lords consent he shall have the double value S at Merton cap. 6. and hold the land over till satisfaction But in case the Lord marrieth the Ward within fourteene yeeres of age to its disparagement cap. 7. he shall lose his Wardship thereby And if the Ward refuseth to accept of a marriage tendred by the Lord before her age of 16 yeeres West 1. c. 22. the Lord shall hold the Lands till he have received the full valew and in case where one tenant holdeth of
sold delayed or denied It s a comprehensive law and made up of many Saxon laws or rather an inforcement of all laws and a remedy against oppression past present and to come and concerneth first the person then his livelihood as touching the person his life and his liberty his life shall be under the protection of the law and his liberty likewise so as he shall be shut into no place by imprisonment nor out of any place by banishment but shall have liberty of ingresse and egresse His estate both reall and personall shall also be under the protection of the Law and the law also shall be free neither denied nor delayed I thinke it needlesse to shew how this was no new law but a confirmation of the old and reparation added thereto being much impaired by stormy times for the summe of all the foregoing discourse tendeth thereto cap. 32. Merchants shall have free and safe passage and trade without unjust taxes as by ancient custome they ought In time of warre such as are of the enemies Countries shall be secured till it appeare how the English Merchants are used in their Countries That this was an ancient law the words thereof shew besides what may be observed out of the Laws of Aetheldred and other Saxon laws So as it appeareth that not onely the English free men and natives had their liberties asserted by the law but also forrainers if Merchants had the like liberties for their persons and goods concerning trade and maintenance of the same and were hereby enabled to enjoy their own under the protection of the law as the free men had And unto this law the charter of King John added this ensuing It shall be lawfull for every free man to passe freely to and from this Kingdome saving fealty to the King unlesse in time of warre and then also for a short space as may be for the common good excepting prisoners outlaws and those Countrey-men that are in enmity and Merchants who shall be dealt with as aforesaid And it seemeth that this law of free passage out of the Kingdome was not anciently fundamentall but onely grounded upon reason of State although the free men have liberty of free passage within the Kingdome according to that originall law sit pax publica per communes vias and for that cause as I suppose it was wholly omitted in the Charter of Henry the third as was also another law concerning the Jewes which because it left an influence behind it after the Jewes were extinct in this Nation and which continueth even unto this day I shall incert it in this short summe After death of the Jewes debtor no usury shall be payd during the minority of the heire though the debt shall come into the Kings hand And the debt shall be payd saving to the wife her dower and maintenance for the children according to the quantity of the debtors Land and saving the Lords service and in like manner of debts to others The whole doctrine of usury fell under the title of Jewes for it seemeth it was their trade and their proper trade hitherto Concil Brit. 299. It was first that I met with forbidden at a Legatine Councell nigh 300 yeeres before the Normans times but by the Confessors law it was made penall to Christians to the forfeiture of estate and banishing and therefore the Jewes and all their substance were holden to be in nature of the Kings villeines as touching their estate Ibid. 623. Glanvil lib. 7. cap. 16. for they could get nothing but was at his mercy and Kings did suffer them to continue this trade for their own benefit yet they did regulate it as touching infants as by this law of King John and the Statute at Merton doth appeare M. Paris An. 1229. Merton cap. 5. Stat. de Judais An 18 E. 1. but Henry the third did not put it into his Charter as I thinke because it was no liberty of the subjects but rather a prejudice thereto and therefore Edward the first wholly tooke it away by a Statute made in his time and thereby abolished the Jewes Tenants Lands holden of Lands escheated to the King shall hold by the same services as formerly cap. 33. cap. 34. In all alienations of Lands sufficient shall be left for the Lords distresse Prerog Reg. cap. 7. Submitting to the judgement of the learned I conceive that as well in the Saxon times as untill this law any tenant might alien onely part of his lands and reserve the services to the alienor because he could not reserve service upon such alienation unto the Lord paramount other then was formerly due to him without the Lords consent and for the same reason could they not alien the whole tenancy to binde the Lord without his expresse licence saving the opinion in the booke of Assizes 20 ass pl. 17. because no tenant could be inforced upon any Lord least he might be his enemy Neverthelesse it seemeth that de facto tenants did usually alien their whole tenancy and although they could not thereby barre the Lords right yet because the Lord could not in such case have the distresse of his own tenant this law saved so much from alienation as might serve for security of the Lords distresse But tenants were not thus satisfied the Lords would not part with their tenants although the tenants necessity was never so urgent upon them to sell their Lands and therefore at length they prevailed by the Statute of Quia emptores to have power to sell all 18 Edw. 1. Westm 3. ca. 1. saving to the Lords their services formerly due and thus the Lords were necessitated to grant licences of alienation to such as the tenants could provide to buy their lands Nor was this so prejudiciall to the Lords in those daies when the publique quiet was setled as it would have been in former times of warre when as the Lords right was maintained more by might and the ayd of his tenants then by law which then was of little power cap. 35. The 35 Chapter I have formerly mentioned in the Chapter concerning the Clergy cap. 36. No man shall be appealed by a woman for the death of any but her own husband The right of appeale is grounded upon the greatest interest Now because the wives interest seemeth wholy to be swallowed up in her husband therefore she shall have an appeale of the death of him onely and such also was the Law in Glanvils time How far this point of interest shall extend to the degrees of consanguinity the Norman Law formerly hath shewen And against whom appeales did lie the Statute at Westminster tels us viz. not onely against the principall West 1. cap. 14 but also against accessories yet not against them till the principall be attainted And because it was ordinary for men of nought to appeale others in a malicious way Westm 2. ca. 13 it was by another law established
of these persons the one being perpetuall the other temporary therefore is there also by these laws a difference in the disposall of their estates for the tutor had a right in the disposing of the one and but a bare authority or power in providing for the other Secondly the person of the tutor is to be considered Anciently it was the next kindred grounded as I conceive upon the naturall affection going along with the blood and this so continued in custome untill these times for though the Miror of Justices saith that Henry the first brought in that course of giving the custody of these disabled persons to the King as hath been formerly observed yet Bracton that wrote long after the time of Henry the first speaking of these kind of persons saith Bract. lib. 5. cap. 20. Talibus de necessitate dandus est tutor vel curator not so much as mentioning the King in the case And in another place speaking of such as are alieni juris saith that some are under the custody of their Lords and others under their parents and friends Lib. 1. cap. 10 But let the time of the entrance of this law be never so uncertaine it s now a declared law that the King in such cases is the common curator or tutor of all such persons as he is a chiefe Justice rendring to every one his right The King shall have the wrecks of the Sea Prerog Reg. cap. 11. West 1. cap. 4. What shall be called a wreck the Statute at Westm 1. declareth viz. where the ship so perisheth that nothing therein escapeth alive and these are rather in their originall committed to the King as a curator then given him as a proprietor although that custome hath since setled a kind of right which may perhaps be accounted rather a title by estoppell For the fundamentall ground is that the right owner cannot be manifested and therefore the King shall hold it and if the right owner can be manifested the King shall hold it till the owner doth appeare Marlb cap. 17. The heire in Socage tenure shall have an action of waste and an accompt against his guardian for the profits of his lands and mariage The heire in Socage being under age shall also be under custody of such guardian of the next kindred Bracton lib. 2. cap. 37. who cannot challenge right of inheritance in such lands so holden as if the Lands descended from the father side the mother or next of the kindred of the mothers side shall have the custody and so if the Lands descend from the mother the father or next kindred of the fathers side shall have the custody And this custody bringeth with it an authority or power onely and no right as in case of the heire in Knightservice and therefore cannot be granted over as the wardship in Knightservice might but the guardian in Socage remaineth accomptant to the heire for all profits both of land and marriage The full age of tenant in Socage is such age wherein he is able to doe that service which is 14 yeeres for at such age he may b able by common repute to ayd in tillage of the ground which is his proper service But the sonne of a Burgesse hath no set time of full age but at such time as he can tell money and measure cloath and such worke as concerne that calling Merton cap. 1. Widdows deforced of their Dower of Quarentine shall by action recover damages till they recover their Dower cap. 2. They shall also have power to divise their crop arising from her Dower Bract. lib. 2. cap. 40. It was used that the heire should have the crop with the Land but this Statute altered that former usage and yet saved the Lords liberty to distraine if any services were due Writs de consimili casu granted in cases that fall under the same Law and need the same remedy West 2. cap. 24. and such Writs shall be made by agreement of the Clerks in the Chancery and advice of such as are skilfull in the Law It was none of the meanest liberties of the freemen of England that no Writs did issue forth against them but such as were anciently in use and agreed upon in Parliament And it was no lesse a grievance and just cause of complaint that Kings used to send Writs of new impression to execute the dictates of their own wils and not of the Laws of the Kingdome M. Paris addit Artic. 44. as the complaints of the Clergy in the times of Henry the third doth witnesse Neverthelesse because many mens cases befell not directly within the Letter of any Law for remedy and yet were very burdensome for want of remedy it s provided by this Law that in such emergent cases that doe befall within the inconvenience shall likewise be comprehended within the remedy of that law Aide to make the sonne of the Lord a Knight West 1. c. 36. and to marry his eldest daughter shall be assessed after the rate of twenty shillings for a Knights fee and twenty shillings for twenty pounds in yeerely value of Soccage tenure The uncertainties of ayds are by this Law reduced and setled as touching the summe and thereby delivered the people from much oppression which they suffered formerly Nor was onely the particular summe hereby but also the age of the sonne when he was to be made a Knight viz. at the age of fifteen yeeres too soon for him to performe Knightservice but not too soone for the Lord to get his money And the daughter likewise was allowed to be fit for marriage at seven yeeres of age or at least to give her consent thereto albeit that in truth she was neither fit for the one or other and therefore it must be the Lords gaine that made the Law and it was not amisse to have the ayd beforehand though the marriage succeeded not for many yeeres after and if the Lord died in the interim the executors having assets paied it or otherwise his heire CHAP. LXVIII Of Courts and their proceedings BEsides the Courts of Justices itinerant which were ancient as hath been said other Courts have been raised of latter birth albeit even they also have been of ancient constitution and divers of them itinerant also and some of them setled in one place The worke of the Justices itinerant was universall comprehending both matters of the Crown and Common-pleas That of oyer and terminer is onely of Crown pleas originally commenced and inquired of by themselves and granted forth upon emergent crimes of important consequence that require speedy regard and reformation Justices of Gaol-delivery have a more large worke that is to deliver the Gaols of all criminall offenders formerly indicted or before themselves Justices of Assize and Nisi prius are to have cognisance of Common pleas onely and for the most part are but fo inquiry All which saving the Justices itinerant in ancient use were instituted
King and complained of that summons as of a common grievance be cause that neither they nor their ancestors were bound to serve the King in that Countrey and they obtained the Kings discharge under his broad Seale accordingly The like whereunto may be warranted out of the very words of the Statute of Mortmaine Stat. Mortm 7 Edw. 1. which was made within the compasse of these times by which it was provided that in case Lands be aliened contrary to that Statute and the immediate Lords doe not seise the same the King shall seise them and dispose them for the defence of the Kinodome viz. upon such services reserved as shall suite therewith as if all the service of a Knight must conduce thereto and that he is no further bound to any service of his Lord then will consist with the safety of the Kingdome This was the doctrine that the sad experience of the later government of Kings in these times had taught the Knighthood of England to hold for the future ages Stat. de Militibus No tenant in ancient demesnes or in Burgage shall be distraimed for the service of a Knight Clerks and tenants in Socage of other Manors then of the King shall be used as they have been formerly Tenants in ancient Demesne and tenants in Burgage are absolutely acquitted from forraine service the one because they are in nature of the Kings husbandmen and served him and his family with victuall the other because by their tenure they were bound to the defence of their burrough which in account is a limbe or member of the Kingdome and so in nature of a Castle guard Now as touching Clerks and tenants in Socage holding of a subject they are left to the order of ancient use appearing upon record As concerning the Clergy its evident by what hath been formerly noted that though they were importunate to be discharged of the service military in regard that their profession was for peace and not for blood yet could never obtaine their desire for though their persons might challenge exemption from that worke yet their Lands were bound to finde armes by their deputies for otherwise it had been unreasonable that so great a part of the Kingdome as the Clergy then had should sit still and looke on whiles by the law of nature every one is engaged in his own defence Nor yet did the profession of these men to be men for peace hold alwaies uniforme some kind of warres then were holden sacred and wherein they not onely adventured their estates but even their own persons and these not onely in defensive way but by way of invasion and many times where no need was for them to appeare Tenants in Socage also in regard of their service might plead exemption from the warres For if not the plough must stand still and the land thereby become poore and lean Neverthelesse a generall service of defence of the Kingdome is imposed upon all and husbandmen must be souldiers when the debate is who shall have the Land in such cases therefore they are evocati ad arma to maintaine and defend the Kingdome but not compelable to forraine service as the Knights were whose service consisted much in defence of their Lords person in reference to the defence of the Kingdome and many times policy of warre drew the Lords into Armes abroad to keepe the enemy further from their borders and the Knights then under their Lords pay went along with them and therefore the service of Knighthood is commonly called servitium forinsecum Of these Socagers did arise not onely the body of English Footmen in their Armies Concil Brit. 406. but the better and more wealthy sort of them found armes of a Knight as formerly hath been observed yet alwaies under the pay of the common purse and if called out of the Kingdome they were meere voluntiers for they were not called out by distresse as Knights were because they held not their Land by such service but they were summoned by Proclamation and probably were mustered by the high Constables in each Hundred the Law neverthelesse remaining still intire that all must be done not onely ad fidem Domini Regis but also Regni which was disputed and concluded by the Sword for though Kings pretended danger to the publique often times to raise the people yet the people would give credit as they pleased or if the Kings title were in question or the peoples liberty yet every man tooke liberty to side with that party that liked him best nor did the Kings proclamation sway much this or that way It s true that presidents of those times cry up the Kings power of arraying all ships and men without respect unlesse of age or corporall disability but it will appeare that no such array was but in time of no lesse known danger from abroad to the Kingdome then imminent and therefore might be wrought more from the generall feare of the enemy then from the Kings command and yet those times were alwaies armed in neighbouring Nations and Kings might have pretended continuall cause of arraying Secondly it will no lesse clearly appeare that Kings used no such course but in case of generall danger to the whole Kingdome either from forraine invasion as in the times of King John or from intestine broiles 21 E. 1. rot 81. as in the times of Henry the third and the two Edwards successively and if the danger threatned onely one coast the array was limited onely to the parts adjacent thereunto Thirdly it seemeth that generall arrayes were not levied by distresse till the time of Edward the first 23 E. 1. Memb. 5. and then onely for the rendezvouz at the next Sea coast and for defence against forraine invasion in which case all subjects of the Kingdome are concerned by generall service otherwise it can come unto no other account then that title prerogative and therein be charactered as a tricke above the ordinary straine Fourthly those times brought forth no generall array of all persons between the ages of sixteen yeeres and sixty that was made by distresse in any case of civill warre but onely by Sheriffs Summons and in case of disobedience by summons to appeare before the King and his Councell which sheweth that by the common law they were not compelable or punishable Lastly though these arraies of men were sometimes at the charge of the King and sometimes at the subjects own charge yet that last was out of the rode way of the Subjects liberty as the subsequent times doe fully manifest And the like may be said of arraies of ships which however under command of Kings for publique service were neverthelesse rigged and payed out of the publique charge The summe of all will be that in cases of defence from forraine invasion Kings had power of array according to the order of Law if they exceeded that rule it may be more rightly said they did what they would then what they ought
should finde two compleat horses And another order of Aetheldred nigh 80 yeeres after differing from it assessed upon every eight hides of Land a Helmet and a coate of Maile and the Historian tels us that a Hide is a plough land Huntington An. 1008. Ll. Canut 97. or so much land as one plough can keepe in tilthe one whole yeere and the reliefe of the Noblemen of all sorts and ranks in Horses Helmets coates of Maile Lances Shields and Swords the meanest of all which degrees being called Mediocris Thainus yeelding a reliefe equall to the Armes of a Knight in the times whereof we now treat viz. one Horse one Helmet one coate of Maile one Lance one Shield one Sword all comprehended under arma sua as if he had a certaine proper Armes and the Laws concerning the forfaiture of Armes doe in effect affirme the thing viz. that all men were armed yet probable it is that Laws were not then so often made for the inforcing this or that particular sort of Armes in regard that till the Normans time this Island was troubled but seldome with any enemies from forraine parts that brought any new sorts of weapons into fashion the Danes and Norwegians being no other then an old acquaintance of theirs Neither were the Saxons as yet tamed by any enemy so farre as to begge a peace albeit that the Danes had gotten them under But after the Norman times the English being somewhat overmatched in warre inclined more to Husbandry and began to lay aside their regard of Armes and this occasioned the Kings to make assessments of Armes yet having regard to the ancient course of the Saxons saving that they urged the use of the Bow more then formerly was used and thereby taught the conquered to conquer the Conquerours in future ages Of these sorts of assessments before this Statute at Wintin I finde but two the first made by Henry the second and the other by Henry the third which together with that of this Statute I parallell thus together in their own words Hen. 2. Hen. 3. Stat. VVint.  Lands Goods  Knights fee 15 Librat 60 Marks 15 li. land 40 marks goods Loricam Caffidem Clipeum Lanceam Loricam Capellum ferri Gladium Cultellum Equum Loricam Capellum ferri Gladium Cultellum Equum Hauberk Shapell de fer Espee Cotell Chivall 16 Marks chatels rents 10 Librat 40 Marks 10 li. lands 20 marks goods Halbergellum Capelletum ferri Lanceam Halburgettum Capellum ferri Gladium Cultellum Halbertum Capellū ferreum Gladium Cultellum Hauberk Shapell de ferr Espee Cotell 10 marks chatels rents 100 s. 20 marks 100 s. land VVanbais Capelletum ferri Lanceam Purpunctum Capellū ferreum Gladium Lanceam Cultellum Purpunctum Capellū ferreum Gladium Cultellum Purpoint Shapell de ferr Espee Cotell  Betwixt 5 l. 40s 9 Marks Betwixt 5 l. 40 s.  Gladium Cultellum Arcum sagit Gladium Arcum sagit Cultellum Espee Arke setes Cotels  under 40 s. under 9 marks to 40 s. under 40 s.  Falces Gisarmas Cultellos c. Falces Gisarmas c. Faulx Gisarmes Cotells    under 20 marks goods    Espees Cotels I have thus impaled these three that the Reader may the better discerne how they relate each to other and so may the better understand the matter in the summe And I must explaine three or foure words in them as they are set down before I can bring up the conclusion because the mistake of the sence of the words hath made some mistake the intent of the thing and force the same to an unwarrantable issue Lipsius de milit Rom. lib 3. Dialog 6. Lorica signifies that piece of Armour that defends the breast or forepart of the body and sometimes is made of plates of Iron of which sort I conceive those of the old Germans were whereof the Historian maketh mention Tacitus pauces loricae he saith the Germans had few Armes of defence of their foreparts and fewer Helmets or Headpieces for otherwise if they had Iron defences for their heads they would not have been content with defences made of Lether for their foreparts as in the first rude times they might have been Ciuer Germ. p. 339. 34. Sometimes it s made of links of Iron and commonly is called a coate of Maile but I conceive it cannot be so meant in the assessments of Henry the second and Henry the third because that those of the second degree are said that they ought to keep Haubergettum or Halburgellum or Haubertum all which are but severall dialects of one name and are taken for a coate of Maile and therefore by the diversity of names in one and the same assessment I doe conclude that the Armour was not of one and the same fashion But it s evident that by Hauberk in the assessment of the Statute at Wint. is meant a coate of Maile and is never taken for a Brest-plate or Gorget as hath been taken upon trust by some that build more weighty conclusions upon that weake principle then its able to beare and for the truth hereof as the word is a French word so I appeale to all French Authors and shall not trouble the reader with the notation of the word or further about the meaning thereof In the last place as great mistake is that also of the word Shapell de ferr which is taken by some to betoken a brest-plate of Iron For the truth whereof the Reader may consider the Latine word Capellum or Capelletum and he shall finde that it is an Iron cap or an ordinary Head-piece and in the Assize of Henry the third it holds the place of Cassis in the Assize of Henry the second for the manner of all these let the Reader view the sculptures of the severall Norman Kings armed for the charge in the beginning of their severall reignes as they are represented in Speeds History It may also be conceived that there is as much mistake of that weapon which is called cultellum or cotell whiles they translate it by the word Knife for though it be true that it is one signification of that word yet it appeares not onely by this law that it was a weapon for a Knight in warre but in use at Torniaments as by that Statute that forbids the use of a pointed Sword or pointed Cottell a Battoone or a Mace at that sport and therefore it may seem to be some weapon of greater use either a Cotellax or such like weapon otherwise to enjoyn the finding of a Knife to a man as an offensive weapon against armed men in battell would serve to no use at all Now concerning the difference between the severall Assizes aforesaid it consisteth either in the number of the severall degrees or rankes of those that are assessed or secondly in the manner of their valuation or lastly in the particulars of their armes assessed upon them As
touching the degrees in Henry the seconds time they were but three in regard that he onely assessed free-holders and certainly that was the ancient Law as by the law of the Conquerour and other Saxon laws formerly mentioned may appeare But Henry the third taking example of King Iohn who was the first founder of generall arrayes charged all but such as were men of nothing albeit I finde not that such as were of the inferiour degree were sworn to those Armes but rather allowed to have them And though the Statute at Winchester holdeth to the same degrees in Lands yet in the valew of goods there is some difference in favour of them that onely have stocke and no freehold Secondly there is some difference in the manner of valuation of Lands with Chattels and therein the Statute at Winton favours the personall estates more then Hen. 3. and he more then Hen. 2. and yet all of them pretend one rule of ancient custome I believe they mean that they had it in their eye but not in their heart for they would come as nigh to it as they could and yet keep as farre from it as they durst Thirdly as touching the difference of the Armes between these three assessments it seems so small as in this they are most of all one For wherein Hen. 2. leads both Hen. 3. and Edw. 1. doe imitate saving that they adde the Horse and Sword which questionlesse was to be understood as a granted case that the compleat Armes of a man could not be carried and mannaged without a Horse nor defended without a Sword As touching other alterations it might be done upon good advice as not being deemed meet that such as were no Knights but in estate should be armed in every respect like as the Knights were And thus we have an ancient custome of maintaining Armes by every free man for the defence of the Kingdome first made uncertaine by the avarice of Kings and negligence of the free men and brought into an arbitrary charge at length reduced to a certainty upon all sorts of inhabitants by a Statute law if so it then were unto which every man had yeelded himselfe bound by his own consent But to what end is all this I said it was for the defence of the Kingdom and so it was in the originall and yet also for the safety of the King in order thereunto and for the safety and maintenance of the peace of every member of the whole body This in one lumpe thus will not down with some who will have this assessment onely to be for keeping of the peace against routs and riots but not sufficient not intended to be supply for warre when Edward the first cals for it because Edward the first shall not have his power confined within the compasse of a Statute but to be at liberty of array as he should think meet and it s not to be denied but the words of this Law runne thus viz. That the intent thereof is for preserving of the peace but those generall words will not beare the power of a restrictive sence for certainly the peace is as well preserved by providing against warre as against riots and against forraine warre as intestine mutinies and that the Statute intended the one as well as the other will appeare because it was made in relation to former presidents of Henry the third and they speak plainly that their intent was to strengthen the Kingdome against dangers from abroad the words of the Historian are cleare that Henry the third charged all that had 15 libratas terrae and upwards should undertake the Armes of a Knight ut Anglia sicut Italia militia roboraretur M. Paris fo 926 And because he had threats from beyond Sea by the defection of the Gascoines therefore he caused Writs to issue forth throughout the Kingdome that secundam pristinam consuetudinem M. Paris fo 864 assessement of Armes should be secundum facultates and in one of the Writs published by the Historian the expresse assessment of Hen. 3. formerly mentioned is particularly set down Vid. post Adversaria M. Paris Nor are these Armes thus assessed so slight as men would pretend for the Armes of the first ranke were the compleat Armes of a Knight and their estates equall thereunto for those 15 libratae terrae amounted unto 780 acres of Land as the late publisher of Paris his History hath it and is very nigh the reckoning of Henry Huntington who as hath been mentioned layeth a Helmet and coate of Maile unto eight hides of Land which according to Gervase of Tilburies account commeth to 800 acres Cap. penalt every Hide containing one hundred acres These therefore were better then Hoblers And the succeeding ranks found Armes also proportionable to their estates as considerable as the times could finde for such as were of constant use and might be supplied with other weapons as occasion served and as they might be of most benefit for the service Furthermore whereas it s said that the wisdome of the Parliament might be questioned if they intended no better provision against an enemy then against a thiefe or rogue I should desire the consideration of those men whether are those thieves and rogues in Troops or bodies and well armed or are they a sort of scattered out-lawes lightly armed to flie away when they have have gotten the prey If they were in the former posture I pray what difference in point of difficulty of suppressing between them and so many enemies and if it was discretion in the Parliament to make this provision against the one certainly these with the Knighthood of the Kingdome with as much discretion will be sufficient provision against the other But if these be looked upon in the latter sence I feare the discretion of the Parliament would have been much more questioned in arming all men that have any ability to suppresse Thieves and Rogues against which the ordinary watch and ward of the Kingdom was an ancient and approved remedy and sufficient safeguard And I would fain know of these men whither it be for the safety of Edward the first or any other King to arme the whole body of the people especially in times of jealousie for suppressing of Thieves and Robbers when as it may be done by a guard of known men in every County with much more ease and lesse charge to the people Lastly whereas it s endeavoured to make this Statute but a temporary provision and taken up for the present condition of affaires when Thieves and Robbers went with great strength and in multitudes This might be I grant of some efficacy if it had been introductio novi juris but it being grounded upon a former custome the ground of that custome which was defence of the Kingdom must be the warrant of the Law otherwise the present inconvenience might be remedied by a present order and needed not the help of a Law that should rest upon former custome
divers Lords the Lords by priority shall have the marriage West 2. cap. 16 These laws were in use during the reignes of those Kings although it can not be certainly concluded hereby that the wives portion properly belonged to the Lord as for his own benefit partly because the female Wards should have no advancement if it belonged to the Lords and partly because this forfeiture was given to the Lords in nature of a penalty as appeareth by the frame of the Statute of Merton cap. 8. Vide Stat. Merton cap. 1 2. Prerog Reg. cap. 4. Widdows shall have their Dower inheritance their inheritance which they have joyntly with their husbands their marriage freely and their Quarentine With due regard of the opinion of others I shall propound my own It seemeth to me that the King is within this Law as well as within the former lawes of the Normans and those of Henry the second that are of this kind and as he is within the compasse of every law of this Charter and that it is called the Grand charter as most immediately comming from the King to the people and not from the Lords Nor is there any ground that the Law should intend to give liberty to widdows of Wards belonging to inferiour Lords to marry whom they will and that onely the Kings widdows shall be bound Nor did this suite with the contest between the Barons and the King that their widdows should be bound unto the King and the widdows of their tenants discharged from their tuition and therefore I conceive by the word maritagium is not meant liberty of marriage but her marriage portion or rationabilis pars according to the foregoing Laws of Henry the first and Henry the second and the Saxon customes But as touching the liberty of marriage it is defined and expressed that the widdows shall not be compelled to marry neverthelesse if they shall marry they must marry with the Lords liking cap. 9. Glanvil lib. 7. cap. 12. otherwise he might have an enemy to be his tenant that might instead of homage and service prove traytour and be his ruine Lastly touching the widdows dwelling the law thought it unreasonable that she should immediately after the death of her husband be exposed to be harbourlesse and therefore ordained that she might continue in her husbands house forty daies if it were not a Castle and then she was to have another dwelling assigned to her because by common intendment she is not supposed to be a person meet to defend a castle and this was called her Quarentine which I met not with amongst the Saxon laws and therefore suppose it be of Norman originall No mans land shall be seised for debt to the King so long as the personall estate will satisfie cap. 10. Nor shall his pledge be troubled so long as the principall is sufficient unlesse he refuse to satisfie and then the pledge shall recover in value The first part hereof was the issue of the law concerning elegit formerly observed in the Saxons times for the regard of law principally extended unto the person next unto the free hold and lastly unto the goods The latter part of this law was the law of pledges or Decenners in the same times unto which the Reader may resort for further light herein The City of London and other Cities Burroughs cap. 11. and Towns and the Cinqueports and other ports shall enjoy their ancient liberties The whole Kingdome and the members thereof herein expressed had all their liberties saved from the dint of conquest by the law of VVilliam the first upon which although some of the succeeding Kings did invade Seld. Spicil fo 192. yet none of them made any absolute disseisin although disturbance in some particulars But King Iohn did not onely confirme them by his grand Charters but by particular Charters to each Corporation with some enlargements and in his grand Charter inserted one clause which in the grand Charter of Henry the third appeareth not which thus ensueth Et ad habendum commune concilium Regni de auxiliis assidendis aliter quam in tribus casibus praedictis which if the barbarisme of the Latine mislead me not is thus in English And to have right of Common councell or to be of the Common councell of the Kingdome for the assessing of ayds other then in three cases aforesaid viz. for redemption of their captive King for Knighting of the Kings sonne and for his daughters marriage because these three might be due by the common Law the two latter by custome the former by common right although mentioned from the late disaster of King Richard which King John might with shame enough remember and expect the same measure from the censure of an unquiet conscience I shall not enter into debate concerning the omission hereof in the later Charters possibly it might seem a tautology Nor concerning the restriction as if it did imply that the Burgesses had vote onely in cases of generall assessements but shall leave it to the consideration of the Reader cap. 12. No distresse shall be taken for greater service or other mater then is due Distresses are in nature no other then a summons in act or the bringing of a man to answer by seisure of part of his goods and it was used by the Saxons as hath been shewed and because the rich men under colour of seeking their right many times sought for wrong and though they could not prevaile in the issue yet prevailed so farre as the defendant could not escape without charge and hindrance Glanvil lib. 12 cap. 9. therefore the law provided a Writ of remedy against unjust vexation which Glanvile remembreth us of and yet because that remedy also carried with it matter of charge and disturbance to the Plantiffe and so the remedy might be worse then the disease therefore the Law defined distresses by circumstances of person matter time and place under penalties of fine and amercement besides the recompence to the party First Stat. Marlbr cap. 1. Glanvil lib 9. cap. 1 8. it must not be taken but by leave from the Kings court unlesse in case of matters due by common right and upon complaint made by the plantiffe The King sent out a summons in this manner Henricus Rex Ang. Hominibus Abbatis de Ramsey salutem Gloss 215. Precipi oquod cito juste reddatis Abbati Domino vestro quicquid ei debetis in censu firma debitis placitis quod si nolueritis ipse vos inde constringat per pecuniam vestram And in all cases of matters due by common right Glanvil lib. 9. cap. 8. Stat. Marlbr cap. 2 3 4 15. the distresse never was done in an arbitrary way but by Judiciall act in the Lords Court Secondly no distresse for suite shall be made out of the fee nor against any person but such as are of that fee. Nor shall any distresse be made in