Heraldry written by Iohn Guillim about fol. 18. That Sisters are allowed no differences of Badges in their Coat-Armour by reason that by them the name of the House cannot be preserved but are admitted to the Inheritance equally and are adjudged but one Heir to all intents and purposes whatsoever And the knowledge of this point in these days is worthy to be enquired into for this is to be observed out of Presidents and to be acknowledged of every dutiful Subject that the King can advance to Honour whom he pleaseth And therefore whereas Radulph Cromwell being a Baron by Writ died without Issue having two Sisters and Coheirs Elizabeth the eldest married unto Sir Thomas Nevill Knight and Ioan the younger married to Sir Humphrey Bowcher who was called to Parliament as Lord Cromwell and not the said Sir Thomas Nevill who married the eldest Sister And Hugh Lupus the first and greatest Earl of Chester Habendum sibi haeredibus adeo libere per gladium sicut iple Rex tenuit Angliam per tenorem Hugh died without Issue and the Inheritance of his Earldom was divided amongst his four Sisters and the eldest had not the Seigniory entire unto herself If a Woman be Noble by Birth or Descent with whomsoever she doth marry although her Husband be under her Degree yet she doth remain Noble for Birth-right est Character indelebilis Other Women are enobled by Marriage and the Text saith thus viz. Women ennobled with the Honour of their Husbands and with the Kindred of their Husbands we worship them in the Court we decree matters to pass in the Names of their Husbands and into the House and Surname of their Husbands do we translate them But if afterwards a Woman do marry with a Man of a baser Degree then she loseth her former Dignity and followeth the condition of her latter Husband And concerning the second disparaged Marriage as aforesaid many other Books of the Law do agree for these be Rules conceived in those Cases Si mulier nobilis nupserit ignobili desinit esse nobilis eodem modo quo quid constituitur dissolvitur It was the Case of Ralph Howard Esq who took to Wife Anne the widow of the Lord Powes they brought an Action against the Duke of Suffolk by the Name of Ralph Howard Esq and the Lady Anne Powes his Wife and exception was taken for mis-naming of her because she ought to have been named of her Husband's Name and not otherwise and the Exception was by the Court allowed For said they by the Law of God she is Sub potestate viri and by our Law her Name of Dignity shall be changed according to the Degrees of her Husband notwithstanding the Courtesie of the Ladies of Honour and Court Dyer 79. And the like is also in Queen Maries Reign when the Dutchess of Suffolk took to her Husband Adrian Brook Title Brief 54. 6. And many other Presidents have been of later times And herewith agreeth the Civil Law Digest lib. 1. title q. lege 1. In this Case of acquired Nobility by marriage if question in Law be whereupon an Issue is taken between the Parties that is to say Dutchesses are not Dutchesses Countesses are not Countesses and Baronesses are not Baronesses the Trial whereof shall not be by Record as in the former Case but by a Jury of Twelve men and the reason of the diversity is because in this Case the Dignity is accrued unto her by her Marriage which the Lawyers term Matter in Fact and not by any Record But a Noble Woman by marriage though she take to her second Husband a man of mean Degree yet she may keep two Chaplains according to the Proviso in the Statute of 11. Hen. 8. Case 13. for and in respect of the Honour which once she had viz. at the time of the Retainer And every such Chaplain may purchase Licence and Dispensation c. And Chaplains may not be Non-residents afterwards And forasmuch as the retaining of Chaplains by Ladies of great Estate is ordinary and nevertheless some questions in Law have been concerning the true understanding of the said Statute Law I think it not impertinent to set down subsequent Resolutions of the Judges touching such matters So long as the Wife of a Duke is called Dutchess or of an Earl a Countess and have the fruition of the Honour appertaining to their Estate with kneeling tasting serving so long shall a Baron's Widow be saluted Lady as is also a Knight's Wife by the courtesie of England quamdiâ— matrimonium aut viduitas uxoris durant except she happen to clope with an Adulterer for as the Laws of this Kingdom do adjudge that a Woman shall lose her Dowry in that as unto Lands Tenements and Justice so doth the Laws of Gentry and Nobleness give Sentence against such a Woman advanced to Titles of Dignity by the Husband to be unworthy to enjoy the same when she putting her Husband out of her mind subjects her self unto another If a Lady which is married come through the Forest she shall not take any thing but a Dutchess Marchioness or Countess shall have advantage of the Statute de Charta Forest. 12 Artic. during the time that she is unmarried This is a Rule in the Civil Law Si filia Regis nubat alicui Duci vel Comiti ducetur tamen semper regalis As amongst Noble Women there is a difference of Degrees so according to their distinct Excellencies the Law doth give special priviledges as followeth By the Statute 25 Edw. 3. cap. 1. it is High Treason to compass or imagine the death of the Queen or to violate the King's Companion The King's Response is a sole person except by the Common Law and she may purchase in Feesimple or make Leases or Grants with the King she may plead and be impleaded which no other married Woman can do without her Husband All Acts of Parliament for any cause which any way may concern the Queen are such Statutes whereof the Judges ought to take Recognizances as of general Statutes though the matter doth only concern the capacity of the Queen yet it doth also concern all the Subjects of the Realm for every Subject hath interest in the King and none of his Subjects within his Laws are divided from the King who is Head and Sovereign so that his business concerns all the Realm and as the Realm hath interest in the King so and for the same Reason is the Queen being his Wife A man seized of divers Lands in Fee holden by Knight's Service some by Priority that is by ancient Feoffment holden of others and some other part holden of the King in posteriority the King granteth his Seigniory to the Queen during her life and afterwards the Tenant dieth his Son within Age in this case he shall have the Wardship of the Body and have the Prerogative even as the King himself should have had The Queen Consort or Dowager shall not be amerced if she be Nonsuited
Parliament by Writ as Baron such Heir Male omitting the Husband of the Issue of such Heir Female And this also appeareth by a notable Controversie in the time of Henry the Seventh between Sir Robert Willoughby Lord Brook and Richard Lord Lattimer for the Barony of Lattimer which in effect was The said Lord Brook did challenge the Barony of Lattimer as Coâ—in and Heir of Elizabeth his Great-grandmother who was Sister and Heir of Iohn Nevill Lord Lattimer who died without Issue And hereupon exhibited a Petition to Henry the Seventh in Parliament whereunto Richard Lord Lattimer was called to answer because he then enjoyed the said Title and Dignity The said Richard Lord Lattimer did by his Answer shew That after the death of the said Iohn Nevill Lord Lattimer without Issue the said Elizabeth was his Sister and next Heir and married unto Thomas Willoughby Knight second Son of the Lord Willoughby But Henry the Sixth for that the said Iohn Nevill Lord Lattimer was dead without Issue and that the next Heir was Female did therefore call to the Parliament George Nevill Knight second Son of Henry Earl of Westmoreland to be Lord Lattimer as Cosin and next Heir Male of the said Iohn Nevill Lord Lattimer which George was Grandfather of the said Richard Lord Lattimer Father of the said Richard In debate of which cause the Question now in hand namely Whether a Barony by Writ may descend to the Heirs Female was advisedly considered of by the King and his Nobility in Parliament and in the end adjudged with the said Richard Lord Lattimer which President doth afford us two Judgments in this point And in the time of Henry the Sixth when the Writ was directed to the said Sir George Nevill Knight whereby he was summoned as Lord Lattimer to the Parliament and as Heir Male and not the said Thomas Willoughby Knight husband of the said Elizabeth Heir Female And the second Judgment was given in the time of Henry the Seventh whereby the said Barony was adjudged to the said Richard Lord Lattimer coming out of the special Heir Male against the Lord Brook descended of the general Heir Male. But here in this President before remembred of the Barony of Dacres may be objected to encounter this Conclusion for there was an Heir Female married unto Sir Richard Fines who by the Declaration of King Henry the Sixth was Baron of Dacres in right of his wife And there was also Ralph and Humphrey the Heirs Males before whom the Heir Female was preferred by the censure of Henry the Sixth and Edward the Fourth This Objection is easily answered for although Henry the Sixth through the Princely favour which he bore unto Sir Richard Fines had declared him to be Lord Dacres in right of his wife yet notwithstanding did Ralph Dacres being Heir Male then unto the Lord Dacres and by that name was attainted in Parliament Anno primo Hen. 4. Wherefore the reason why the Heir Male could not be regarded was the said Attainder of the said Raâ—ph and Humphrey his brother and therefore when Humphrey in the 12 th of Edward the Fourth laboured to have the said Attainder Reversed he submitted himself to the Arbitrement of the King who to satisfie both Competitors both having deserved of him after he had admitted them to his favour he allowed one to be Lord Dacres and the other to be the Lord Dacres of Gillesland And thus much concerning the second Point Whether a Barony by Writ may descend unto the Heir Female The third Point As concerning the third Point admitting such Descent to be to the Heir Female when there is no Heir Male that may claim the same for then doth this Question take place Whether the husband of such an Heir Female shall enjoy the Dignity in right of his wife or no Wherein we are to rest upon a Resolution had and given to this special Question which was in this manner In the time of Henry the Eighth when Mr. Winby took upon him the style of Lord Talbois in right of his wife having no Issue by her The said King assisted both by Civil and Temporal Lawyers gave Sentence That no husband of a Baroness in her right should use that Style and Dignity until he had by her a Child whereby she should become Tenant by Courtesie unto her Inheritance The special Reasons that occasioned this Sentence were two First It should be convenient for her husband this day to be a Baron and a Peer of the Realm and to morrow by the death of his wife to become none and without the default of the party Secondly If he had Issue by wife and were entituled to be Tenant by the Courtesie of England of his wives Lands if he shall not also bear the Style and Dignity of his Wives Barony then should the Son after the death of his mother dying in the life time of his father be a Baron and Lord without Land for so the father should have the Land as Tenant by Courtesie and the Son the Lordship without Land And thus much said concerning the Nature Quality and Estate of a Baron by Writ and for the Resolution of the several points and Articles of the Question proposed may suffice CHAP. XII Barons by Patent which is the third kind of Barons mentioned in the former Division of Barons THere is also a fourth means of Creation viz. by Act of Parliament but the first two mentioned and this other by Patent is most usual for the Honour of the King for thereby the Donation doth proceed from his Majesty only as from the Fountain of Honour But when the Creation is by Parliament the King ever is one and may be said to be Donor A Baron therefore by Creation by reason of Letters Patents is that noble Person whom the King or any of his Progenitors Kings of this Realm have created Baron by such their Letters Patents began in the Reign of King Richard the Second This kind of Dignity of a Baron shall be of such continuance in Descent or otherwise as shall be limited in the Habendum in such Letters Patents contained for it may be but for the life of him to whom it is given or for term vanter vie as some hold Opinion in the 32 of Hen. 6. for cujus est dare est disponere It may be in special in our general Tayl and this kind of Tayl was usual before the Statute made decimo tertio of Edw. 1. by which Estate Tayl of Lands and Tenements was created as appeareth by the Patent whereby Hubert de Burgo was made Earl of Kent in the time of Henry the Third by these words Habendum sibi haeredibus suis de corpore Margaretae uxoris sui sorors Alexandri Regis Scotiae procreatis pro defectu talis exitus remanere in directis haeredibus dicti Huberti And that Estates intayl are at this Day of Titles of Honour by the said Statute of Westminster the second Question If a
again into the Hall where he shall sit at Table with the Knights and being risen and retired into his Chamber his Attire is taken off and again clothed with a blew Robe having on his left Shoulder a Lace of white Silk hanging to be worn upon all his Garments from that day forwards till he have gained some Honour and Renown for some Feats of Arms or some Prince or Lady of Quality cut that Lace from his Shoulder After Dinner the Knights must come to the Knight and conduct him into the King's presence to return him thanks for these Honours and so takes his leave of the King and the Governours craving his pardon for any miscarriage and claiming their Fees according to the Custom of the Court also take their leaves of the Knight I shall conclude this Chapter with giving an Account of the Knights made at the Coronation of his Majesty Knights of the Bath made at the Coronation of his Majesty King CHARLES the Second EDward Lord Clinton now Earl of Lincoln Iohn Egerton Viscount Brackley eldest Son to the Earl of Bridgwater Sir Philip Herbert then second Son to the Earl of Pembroke Sir William Egerton second Son to the Earl of Bridgwater Sir Vere Fane second Son to the Earl of Westmoreland Sir Charles Berkley eldest Son to George Lord Berkley Sir Henry Bellasis eldest Son to the Lord Bellasis Sir Henry Hyde now Earl of Clarendon Sir Rowland Bellasis Brother to Viscount Faulconberg Sir Henry Capell Sir Iohn Vaughan now eldest Son to the Earl of Carbery Sir Charles Stanley Grandchild to the late Earl of Derby Sir Francis Fane Sir Henry Fane Grandchildren to the Earl of Westmoreland Sir William Portman Baronet Sir Richard Temple Baronet Sir William Ducy Baronet Sir Thomas Trevor Baronet Sir Iohn Scudamore Baronet Sir William Gardiner Baronet Sir Charles Cornwallis afterwards Lord Cornwallis Sir Iohn Nicholas Sir Iohn Monson Sir Bourcher VVray Sir Iohn Coventry Sir Edward Hungerford Sir Iohn Knevett Sir Philip Boteler Sir Adrian Scroop Sir Richard Knightley Sir Henry Heron. Sir Iohn Lewkenor Sir George Brown Sir William Tyrringhum Sir Francis Godolphin Sir Edward Baynton Sir Greville Verney Sir Edward Harley Sir Edward VValpool Sir Francis Popham Sir Edward VVise. Sir Christopher Calthrop Sir Richard Edgcombe Sir William Bromley Sir Thomas Bridges Sir Thomas Fanshaw Sir Iohn Denham Sir Nicholas Bacon Sir Iames Altham Sir Thomas VVendy Sir Iohn Bramston Sir George Freeman Sir Nicholas Slaning Sir Richard Ingoldsby Sir Iohn Rolle Sir Edward Heath Sir William Morley Sir Iohn Bennet Sir Hugh Smith Sir Simon Leech Sir Henry Chester Sir Robert Atkyns now one of the Justices of the Common Pleas. Sir Robert Gayre Sir Richard Powle Sir Hugh Ducy Sir Stephen Hales Sir Ralph Bash. Sir Thomas VVhitmore OF Knights Batchelors With what is incident to that Degree of KNIGHTHOOD According to the Laws of England CHAP. XXI THE particular kinds of Services by which Lands of Inheritance are distinguished are two viz. Knights of Service and Knights of Soccage And in ancient time Tenure by Knights Service was called Regale servitiâ—m because it was done to and for the King and Realm and forinsecum servitium as appeareth in the 19 Edw. 2. Avowry 224. 26. Ass. p. 66. 7. Hen. 4. 19. Coke's seventh Part 8. a. Calvin's case because they who hold by Escuage ought to do and perform their Services out of the Realm Litt. 35. ideo forinsecum dici potest sit quia capitur foris hujusmodi servitia persolvuntur ratione Tenementorum non Personarum And as knights-service-Knights-Service-Land requireth the service of the Tenant in Warfare and Battel abroad so Soccage-Tenure commandeth the attendance at the Plough the one by Manhood defending the King or his Lord's life and person the other by industry maintaining with Rents Corn and Victuals his Estate and Family For Kings did thus order their own Lands and Tenements one part they kept and detained in their own hands and in them stately Houses and Castles were erected and made for their habitations and defence of their Persons and of the Realm also Forests and Parks were there made for their Majesties Recreation One other part thereof was given to the Nobles and others of their Chivalry reserving Tenure by Knights Service The third part was bestowed upon men of meaner condition and quality with reservation of Soccage-Tenure And in this manner the Dukes and Nobles amongst their Menials and Followers dissipated a great part of their Lands viz. to their Gentlemen of quality to hold by Knights Service and to other of meaner condition by Soccage-Tenure The Right Honourable S. Ioseph Williams on of Milbeck hall in Cumberland Knight one of his Majestys principall Secretarys of State c a. The Honourable Sr. Robert Atkins of Totteridge in Hertford shire and of Sapperton in Glocester shire Knight of the Bath and one of his matys Iustices of the ComÌ„on pleas c a. Sr. Iohn Bennet of Dawly in Midd sx Kt. of the honble order of the Bath Leivtenant to his maties Band of Gentlemen Pentioners and eldest brother to the Rt. honble Henry Earle of Arlington who was first maried to Elizabeth Countess of Mulgrave daughter to the Earle of Midd sx and now to Bridget Howe of the Family of Sr. Grubham Howe Sr. Robert Southwell Knight one of the Clerkes attending his Majesty King Charles the Second in his most Honourable privy Councell câ—t Sr. Hugh Wyndham of Silton in Dorsetshire Kt. one of the Iustices of his matys Court of Comon pleas at Westminster eighth sonn of S. Iohn Wyndham of Orchard-Wyndham in Somersetshire Kt who was lineally descended from the antient Family of the Wyndhams of Felbrigg in Norfolk â—ownâ—r therâ—of Sr. Thomas Daniell of Beswick in the East Rideing of Yorkshire Kt. Major to his matys Regiment of Foot Guards and Captaine of his matys Archchiffe Fort in Dover Sr. Thomas Mompessonâ— antiently Montpintsonâ— of Bathampton in Wiltshire Knight a person of eminent Loyalty and suffering in the late trouble whose Family have been of greate antiquity in the said County Sr. Thomas Lynch of Great Sonkey in Lancashire Kt. one of the Gentlemen of his matyâ— privy Chamber in ordinary and late Governour of his Ma â—â—â— Island of Jamaica decended of the Lincâ—â—s of Groves in Kent and is now maried to Vere Herbert 2â— daughter of Sr. Edw Herbert sometyme Lord Keeper of the groâ—t seaâ—e Sr. William Pelham of Brocklesby in Lincolnshire Kt. whose Grandfatâ—er Sr. William Pelham of the said place Kt. who was descended of the antient family of the Pelhams of Langhtoniâ—â— sussex was employed under Queen Eliz in the offices of L d cheife Justice of Ireland Marshall of the English forces sentinto the Low Countrys Mastâ—â— of her ordnanceâ— and one of her privy Councell Sr Thomas Daviâ—s of the Citty of London Knight Ld. Maior thereof Anno 1677. Sr. William Prichard of the Citty of London Kt. and Alderman now maried to Sarah daughter of Francis
to the party for so it is termed in Brook's Title Additions 44. but an Honour to the Kingdom And therefore it hath been an ancient Prerogative of the Kings of this Realm at their pleasure to compel men of worth to take upon them that Degree upon payment of a Fine But we see by Experience in these days that none are compelled thereunto and that is the reason wherefore if the Plaintiff be Knighted having the Writ it shall abate because he hath changed his name and that by his own Act. And for that cause also by the Common Law not only the King but every Lord of a Mannor ought to have of every of his Tenants a reasonable Aid to make his eldest Son a Knight And all Lands are subject to these Aids except only ancient Demesne and grand and petty Serjeanty-Tenures as the Law hath â—een anciently delivered And in Io. Shelden 131. where also it is said one that wrote a little after the Statute of Westminster the first allows as a good barr to the Avowry for the Tenant to plead that the Father himself is no Knight so that one not Knighted cannot claim this Ayd of his Tenants Briâ—an cap. de prices de avers And it was at the liberty of the Lord to make more or less of his Tenants by the Common Law in this Case but by the Statute of Westminster the first Chap. 35. it is put in contrary viz. forasmuch as before this time reasonable Aid to make ones Son Knight or to marry his Daughter was never put in certain nor how much should be taken nor at what time whereby some levied unreasonable Aid and more often than seemed necessary whereby the people were sore grieved It is provided that from henceforth of a whole Knight's Fee there be taken but Twenty shillings and of Twenty pounds in Land holden in Soccage Twenty shillings and of more more and of less less after that rate And that none shall levy such Aid to make his Son a Knight until his Son be of fifteen years old nor to marry his Daughter until she be of the Age of seven years And of that there shall be mention made in the King's Writs formed on the same when any will demand it And if it happen that the Father after he hath levied such Aid of his Tenants die before he hath married his Daughter the Executors of the Father shall be bound to the Daughter for so much as the Father received for the Aid And if the Father's Goods be not sufficient his Heir shall be charged therewith unto the Daugher And this Aid is so incident that although the Lord do confirm unto the Tenant to hold by Fealty and certain Rent and release unto him all other Services and Demands yet shall he have the Aid to make his eldest Son a Knight But the King was not bound by the Statute aforementioned because the King was not named in the Statute Therefore by the Statute 25 Edw. 3. chap. 11. the King's Aid were brought to a like value The intention of the Law is That an Heir until the Age of One and twenty years is not able to do Knights Service But such a presumption of Law doth give place to a Judgment of proof to the contrary as Bracton saith Sâ—abitur presumptioni donec probetur in contrarium And therefore when the King who is the Sovereign Judge of all Chivalry hath dubbed him a Knight he by this hath adjudged him able to do him Knight's Service and all men are concluded to say the contrary to it And therefore such an Heir being made a Knight either in the life time of his Father or afterwards during his minority shall be out of Ward and Custody both for his Land and Body and marriage by the Award of the ancient Common Law By reason also that the Honour of Knighthood is so great that it is not to be holden under by any yet if the King do create such an Heir within Age a Duke Marquess Earl Viscount or â—aron by this he shall not be out of Ward and Custody both for his Land and Body And therefore it is propounded by the Statute of Magna Charta chap. 3. Ita tamen quod si ipse dum infra aetatem fuerit fiat miles nihilominus terra remaneat in Custodia Dominorum suorum So that although such an Heir within Age be made Knight and thereby to this purpose is esteemed as of full Age yet the Land shall remain in Custody of the Lord till his Age of One and twenty years by the purview of the said Act. Question If the Son and Heir of the Tenant of the King by Knights Service c. be made Knight in Paris by the French King whether he shall be out of Wardship after the death of his Father or no for thereby he is a Knight in England Coke's seventh part b. 2 Edw. 4. fol. tamen vide in Coke's sixth part 74. b. mention is only made of Knights made by the King himself or by his Lieutenant in Ireland But when the King doth make an Heir apparent within Age of a Tenant by Knights Service a Knight in the life of his Ancestor and after the death of his Ancestor the said Heir being within Age shall in this Case be out of Ward and shall pay no value for his marriage neither shall the Lord have the Custody of the Land for in that Case by the making of him Knight in the life of his Ancestor he is made of full Age so that when his Ancestor dieth no interest either in the Body or in the Land shall invest in the Lord but the Knight may tender his Livery as if he were of full Age And in that case the King shall have primier Seisin as if he had been One and twenty years of Age at the time of the death of his Ancestor and not otherwise For the Statute of Magna Charta doth not extend unto it for the purview of it doth extend only when the Heir in Ward infra aetatem is made Knight then remanet terra in Custodia c. But when the Heir is made Knight in the life of his Ancestor then the Custody cannot remain which never had any inception or essence Also when the Heir after the death of his Ancestor within Age is made Knight if after tender made to him he within Age do marry elsewhere yet he shall not pay the forfeiture of his marriage for by the making him Knight he is out of Ward and Custody of his Lord for then he ought to be sui Iuris and may imploy himself in feats of Arms for defence of the Realm c. and therefore may not be within the Custody of another and none shall pay any forfeiture but when after any refusal he doth marry himself during the time when he is under the custody and keeping of his Lord And this doth appear by the Statute of Merton chap. 6. Si se mariturierit sine licentia
Authority of Parliament made in the Eleventh of King Edward aforesaid and therefore to supply that defect in the Fifth of Edward the Third he was created Duke of Cornwall by special Charter Elizabeth eldest Daughter of King Edward the Fourth was not a Dutchess of Cornwall although she was the Firstbegotten Daughter of Edward the Fourth for the Limitation is to the First-begotten Son Henry the Eighth was not in the life of his Father King Henry the Seventh after the death of his eldest Brother Arthur Duke of Cornwall by force of the said Creation for although he was sole Heir apparent yet he was not his eldest begotten Son And the Opinion of Stamford a Learned Judge hath been That he shall have within his Dukedom of Cornwall the King's Prerogative because it is not severed from the Crown after the form as it is given for none shall be Inheritor thereof but the King 's of the Realm For example whereas by Common Law if a man hold divers Mannors or other Lands or Tenements of divers Lords all by Knights Service some part by Priority and ancient Feoffment and other Land by Posterity and a later Feoffment and the Tenant so seized dieth and his Son and Heir within Age in this case the custody and wardship of the Body and his marriage may not be divided amongst all the Lords but one of them only shall have right unto it because the Body of a man is intire And therefore the Law doth say That the Lord of whom some part of those Lands are holden by Priority and by the same Tenure of Chivalry shall have it except the King be any of the Lords for then though the Tenant did purchase that Land last yet after his death the King shall be preferred before any of the other Lords of whom the Tenant did hold the Priority And so shall the Duke of Cornwall in the same Case have the Prerogative if his Tenant die holding of him but by posterity of Feoffment for any Tenure of his Dutchy of Cornwall although the same Duke is not seized of any particular Estate whereof the Reversion remaineth in the King for the Prince is seized in Fee of his Dukedom as beforesaid Iohn of Gaunt the fourth Son of King Edward the Third took to Wife Blanch Daughter and Heir of Henry Duke of Lancaster who had Issue Henry King of England so that the said Dutchy of Lancaster did come unto the said Henry by descent from the party of his Mother and being a Subject he was to observe the Common Law of the Realm in all things concerning his Dutchy For if he would depart in Fee with any thereof he must have made Livery and Seisin or if he had made a Lease for life reserving Rent with a Re-entry for default of payment and the Rent happen to be behind the Duke might not enter without making his Demand or if he had alienated any part thereof whilst he was within Age he might defeat the Purchaser for that Cause and if he would grant a Reversion of an Estate for life or years in being there must also be Attornment or else the Grant doth not take effect But after that he had deposed King Richard the Second and did assume the Royal Estate and so had conjoyned his Natural Body in the Body Politick of the King of this Realm and so was become King then the possession of the Dutchy of Lancaster was in him as King but not as Duke which degree of Dignity was swallowed up in that of the King for the lesser must always give place to the greater And likewise the Name of the Dutchy and the Franchises Liberties and Jurisdictions thereof when in the King's Hands were by the Common Law extinct and after that time the possessions of the Dutchy of Lancaster could not pass from Henry the Fourth by Livery of Seisin but by his Letters Patents under the Great Seal without Livery of Seisin and with Attornment And if he make a Lease for Life being Duke reserving a Rent with a Re-entry for default of payment and after his Assumption of the Crown his Rent happen to be unpaid he might Re-enter without Demand for the King is not bound to such personal Ceremonies as his Subjects are Therefore to have the said Dutchy to be still a Dutchy with the Liberties to the same as it was beâ—ore and to alter the order and degree of the Lands of the Dutchy from the Crown the said King Henry the Fourth made a Charter by Authority of Parliament which is entituled Charta Regis Hen. 4. de separatione Lancastriae à corona authoritate Parliamenti Anno Regni sui primo as by the Tenor thereof may appear And so by Authority of that Parliament the said Dutchy with all the Franchises and Liberties was meerly resigned from the Crown and from the Ministers and Officers thereof and from the Order to pass by such Conveyance which the Law did require in the possessions of the Crown But now the possessions of the Dutchy by force of the said Statute stood divided from the Crown and ought to be demeaned and ordered and pass as they did before Henry the Fourth was King yet there is no Clause in the Charter which doth make the person of the King who hath the Dutchy in any other Degree than it was before But things concerning his pleasure shall be in the same estate as they were before such separation insomuch as if the Law before the Charter by Authority of Parliament adjudged the person of the King always of full Age having regard unto his Gifts as well of the Lands which he doth inherit in the right of his Crown or Body Politick it shall be so adjudged for the Dutchy Land after the said Statute for the Statute doth go and reach unto the Estate Order and Condition of the Lands of the Dutchy but doth not extend unto the person of the King who hath the Lands in points touching his person Neither doth that distinguish or alter the preheminences which the Law doth give to the person of the King For if King Henry the Fourth after the said Act had made a Lease or other Grant of parcel of the Dutchy by the Name of Henry Duke of Lancaster only it had been void for it should have been made in the Name of Henry the Fourth King of England And thus stood the Dutchy of Lancaster severed from the Crown all the Reign of Henry the Fourth Henry the Fifth and Henry the Sixth being politickly made for the upholding of the Dutchy of Lancaster their true and ancient Inheritance however the right Heir to the Crown might in future time obtain his right thereunto as it happened in King Edward the Fourth's time but after the said King Edward obtained his right unto the Crown in Parliament he attainted Henry the Sixth and appropriated and annexed the said Dutchy again to the Crown as by the Statute thereof made in the first of the King's Reign
Nobleman and his Progenitors have for a long time been called to Parliament and be a Baron either by Tenure or Writ and have had in regard thereof a place certain in Parliament if afterwards the said Nobleman should be created a Baron of that Barony and by the same name by Letters Patents whether shall he and his Heirs retain his old place in Parliament which he had according to his former Dignity or whether shall he lose his old place and take a new one according to the time of his Creation Answer The Case of the Lord Delaware lately erected a Resolution somewhat answerable to this Question Thomas Delaware in the third of Edward the Sixth being in some displeasure with William West his Heir and Nephew who was Father to Thomas late Lord Delaware and Grandfather to Henry Lord Delaware that Nevis procured by Act of Parliament by which the said William West was during his natural life only clearly disabled to claim demand or have any manner of Right Title or Interest by Descent Remainder or otherwise in or to the Mannors Lands Tenements or Hereditaments Title and Dignity of Thomas Lord Delaware his Uncle c. After the said Thomas Delaware died and the said William West was in the time of Queen Mary attainted of Treason by Verdict but pardoned by the said Queen and afterwards by Parliament in the time of Queen Elixabeth was restored and in the fourth year of her Reign was created Lord Delaware by Patent and took place in Parliament accordingly for that by the said Act of Parliament of Edward the Sixth he was excluded to challenge the former ancient Barony and after he died Now whether Thomas Delaware should take his place according to the ancient Barony by Writ or according to his Father's Creation by Patent was the Question The Opinions of the late Queens Council being his Majestie 's Attorney General and Solicitor were That the acceptance of the new Creation by the said William West could not extinguish the ancient Dignity for that he had not the ancient Dignity in him at that time of his Creation but the Dignity was by the Act of Parliament 3 Edw. 6. in the ballance of suspence or consideration of Law and he thereby utterly disabled to have the same during his life only so as other acceptance could not extinguish that Dignity which he then had not nor could not conclude his Heir who was not disabled by the Parliament 3 Edw. 6. to claim the ancient Barony which Opinion of theirs was seen and allowed by the then Chief Justice of England and Lord Chief Baron and so signified to the Lord Keeper But this to be noted by the Reasons made for the said Resolution though if the said Sir William West had been Baron and entituled and in possession of the ancient Dignity when he accepted the ancient Creation the Law perchance might have been otherwise but that remains as yet unresolved Nevertheless the Rule is Eodem modo quo quid constituitur dissolvitur But by a Grant which is but a matter of Fact a man cannot transfer his Title of Honour And thus much concerning the Degrees of Barons within this Realm upon this occasion for the better understanding and direction of that which followeth to be handled And in this place I think it not impertinent to mention one Case which I met with in our Books of Common Law concerning the Descent of a Title of Honour whereof the Ancestor had Estate in Feesimple there is a Maxim in the Law Possessio fratris in feodo facit sororemesse haeredem But if a man by any of the three means aforesaid be created into a Title of Dignity to him and his Heirs for ever and so have Issue by one wife a Son and a Daughter and hath also a Son by a second wife afterwards the Father dieth and his eldest Son entreth into all his Father's Inheritances and also enjoyeth the Titles and Dignities which his Father had but dieth without Issue In this Case the Dignity shall descend upon the younger Son though he be but of the half blood to him that last enjoyed that Name and Title of descent and shall not descend to his Sister of the whole blood And yet in this case he shall only be her Brother's Heir of all his Feesimple Lands and the reason thereof is because possessio fratris is the name and sole cause which may give Title to her his Sister which faileth in this case of Dignity for it cannot be said that her elder brother was in possession of his Title of Honour no more than of his blood so as neither by his own act nor any act to be done by any other did gain more actual possession if so it may be termed then by the Law did descend to him and therefore the younger brother may well by the Law make himself Heir unto his Father of the Honour that he cannot be heir unto his brother So that this word Possession which is no other than pedis positio extendeth only unto such things of which a man may by hâ—s entry or other act be possessed and doth require actual possession Coke's third part 92. Having thus much treated concerning the Creations and other things incident to the degrees of Nobility I cannot omit some things concerning the sufficiency and ability of Estate which the Law doth require to be in every of them according to their several Dignities The Common Law which always will decorum and conveniency be observed considering the Charges and Dignities appertaining to these Degrees and Dignities being Offices of principal Service to the King and Realm both in War and Peace hath ordered that each of them ought to have a convenient Portion and Inheritance in Land to support the said Dignity which Supplies are as Sinews conjoyned in the same For in Vertue and Riches as Aristotle confesseth all the old Nobility consisted and which two Properties maketh a good Complement for utilior est sapientia cum divitiis conjuncta Therefore a Knight's Fee which he ought to have is Twenty pounds Land by the year a Baron's thirteen Knights Fees and a quarter and an Earl's twenty Knights Fees For always the fourth part of each Revenues which is by the Law held requisite for the Dignity shall be paid to the King for the Relief As for Example the Relief of a Knight is five pounds which is the one fourth of his Revenue according to the Statute of the first of Edward the Second The Relief of a Baron is One hundred Marks which is also the fourth part of his Revenue And the Relief of an Earl is One hundred pounds alâ—o the fourth part of his Revenue And it appears by the Records of the Exchequer that the Relief of a Duke amounteth unto Three hundred pounds And this is the reason in our Books that every of the Nobility is presumed in the Law to have sufficient Freehold ad sustinendum nomen onus And to what value
There is none of the Nobility but have sufficient Freehold which the Plaintiffs may extend for their payment or satisfaction But a Capias or Exigit lieth against a Knight for the Law hath not that Opinion of his Freehold And if any of the Nobility happen to be so wilful and not to appear the Court will compel the Sheriff to return great Issues against him and so at every default to encrease the issues as lately against the Earl of Lincoln hath been in practice By the ancient Laws of this Realm before the coming of William the Conqueror many good Laws were made for keeping the Peace and amongst others That all above the age of twelve years should be sworn to the King which we in remembrance thereof do keep at this day in the view of Frank Pledge or the Court Leet But Noblemen of all sorts are neither bound to attend the Court Leet nor to take the Oath as appeareth by Britan. c. 29. treating of the Court called the Sheriffs Tourn out of which the Leet to be extracted And agreeable thereunto is the Statute of Marlbridge cap. 10. See the Lord Chancellor's Speech in the case of Postnati fol. 78. If a Writ of Error be brought in Parliament upon a Judgment given in the King's Bench the Lords of the higher House alone without the Commons are to examine the Errors ibid. fol. 22. In the 11 th of Henry the Fourth fol. 26. in a Case concerning a Distress taken for Expences and Fees the Knights of the Parliament are not contributary for such Lands as are parcel of their ancient Lordships and Baronies but for other Lands they are But there is a Question made If one which is no Baron but ignoble do purchase any ancient Barony whether he shall be discharged of such Expences and Fees or not Which is not worthy the questioning For as Land holden by Villainous Service doth not make him a Villain or Bondman which being free doth purchase the same although by his Tenure he shall be bound to do such Villainous Service So on the other side Land that is holden by Barony doth not make the Villain or Ignoble which purchaseth the same to be Noble although the charge of such Tenure do lye upon him in respect of the Service of the Realm It is said in our Books That a day of Grace or by the favour of the Court is not to be granted to the Plaintiff in any Suit or Action whereby a Nobleman is Defendant because thereby a Nobleman should be longer delayed than the ordinary course of the Court is and such a Lord is to have expedition of Justice in respect that he is to attend the person of the King and the Service of the Commonwealth But if there be no Noble person to the Suit the Judges do and may at their discretion upon a motion grant a day more of Grace otherwise than by the strict course of the Law the Plaintiff may challenge Cambden f. 169. writing upon this Subject saith Where a Nobleman is Demandant the Defendant may not be assoyned for the delay and cause aforesaid To which I could also subscribe but that the Book in the fifth of Hen. 4. 15. b. is otherwise adjudged There the King brought a Quare Impedit against a common person and the Defendant was essoyned by a Rule of Court If any Peer of the Realm be Plaintiff or Defendant in any Action real or personal a-against any other whereupon any Issue is to be tryed by a Jury the Sheriff must return one Knight at the least to be of the Inquest otherwise upon challenge made the whole pannel shall be quashed Which by order of the Law is appointed to be done for honour and reverence due to the person of that degree For when a Peer of the Realm is party it is otherwise than when the Suit is between private persons F. N. B. Title Challenge 115. 13. Edward the Third in a Quare Impedit against a Bishop adjudged But the Earl of Kent in the fourteenth year of the late Queen's Reign and the parties did plead to an Issue the Venire Facias is awarded which the Sheriff did return â—â—rved and a pannel returned accordingly in which is no Knight named The truth of which Case was that after the return made the Demand is published and demanded by the Queen and the Heralds to be Earl of Kent in right and discent although he had not been so reputed or named before and also after that time that is to say at the then last Parliament the Tenant is made a Baron by Writ of Parliament and then the Jury doth appear in the Court of Common Pleas and the Earl of Kent did challenge the Array because no Knight was returned but it was not allowed him by the Court for the admittance of both parties is to the contrary and no default can be laid to the Sheriff for he had no notice of the honourable Esâ—ate of either of the parties the Demandant not being then known or reputed to be an Earl by descent or of the Tenant then also being no Baron How much the Common Law hath always prohibited perpetuity in Lands and Tenements you may see in Corbet's Case in the first part of Coke's Book fol. 48. and in many other Cases in the rest of his Books As also Littleton fol. 145. saith it is a principle in the Law that every Land in Feesimple may be charged with a Rent But if the King's Majesty upon a Creation of any Peer of the Realm of what degree soever do as the manner is by Letters Patent give unto any such new created Nobleman an Annuity or Rent for the support of his degree which they call Creation-money this is so annexed to the dignity that by no Grant Assurance or any manner of Alienation it can be given from the Lord but is still incident and a support of the same Creation In all Cases wherein is any Suit a Baron or Peer of the Realm is to be amerced no less than five pounds but the amercement of a Duke is One hundred pounds Although the Statute of Magna Charta chap. 14. be in the Negative viz. Comites Barones non amercientur nisi per pares suos non nisi secundum modum delicti yet use hath reduced it into a certainty As also by the same Statute it appeareth that such Amercements should be assessed per pares suos but that it were troublesome to assemble Barons for so small a matter such Amercements in times past have been assessed by the Barons of the Exchequer who sometime were Barons of the Realm as is already taken notice of and so writeth Bracton lib. 3. tract cap. 1. fol. 116.8 Whereas by Statute 32 Hen. 8. cap. 16. it is enacted That the Subjects of this Realm shall not keep in their Houses or Families above the number of four Strangers born nevertheless by a Proviso in the same Act every Lord of the Parliament hath this
his Enemies by Forty days well and conveniently arrayed for the War In this Case the Law hath such regard to the Dignity of Knighthood that he may find an able person to go for him and the Knight is not compelled by his Tenure to go in person as ordinary Souldiers who are hired or retained by Prest-money or Wages There hath been many and varying Opinions of the contraries of a Knight's Fee as you may read in Coke's ninth Part 122. and there it is proved that Antiquity hath thought that Twenty pounds in Land was sufficient to maintain the Degree of Knighthood as it doth appear in the ancient Treatise De modo tenendi Parliamentum tempore Regis Edwardi filii Regis Ethelred which also doth concur with the Act of Parliament Anno primo Edw. 2. de militibus by which Act of Parliament Census militis the Estate of a Knight was measured by the value of Twenty pound Lands per Annum and not by any certain content of Acres And with this doth agree the Statute of VVestminster cap. 35. Fitz. Nat. Brev. 82. where Twenty pounds Land per Annum in Soccage is put in equipage with a Knight's Fee And this is the most reasonable estimation for one Acre may be more worth in value than many others And it is to be observed That the relief of a Knight and of all Superiors that be Noble is the fourth part of their Revenue by the year as of a Knight five pounds and so of the rest And because this Tenure doth concern Service in War the Tenants are therefore called Milites Militia for though the word doth properly signifie a Souldier yet antiquity hath appropriated that name to the chiefest of Military Profession In our Law they are styled Milites and never Equites yet so that Miles is taken for the self same that Chivalry is Bracton fol. 79. maketh mention of Rode Knights that is to say serving Horsmen who held their Lands with condition that they should serve their Lords on Horsback And so by cutting off a peece of a Name as our delight is to speak short this name Knight remaineth with us for Armiger scil the Esquire which is a Degree under the Knight was in the Military Service to serve on foot Note He that holdeth by a whole Knight's Fee must be with the King Forty days well and compleatly arrayed for the War which is to be understood to serve on Horseback And in all Nations the name of this Dignity is taken of Horses for the Italians call them Cavelieri the Frenchmen Chivaleris the Germans Regters our Britains Murgeghe all riding and in Latin we call them Equites aurati for at their Creations besides the Sword and Girdle gilt Spurs were added for more Ornament And when a Knight doth commit any offence for which he is by the Law to suffer death the use hath been in the begining of his punishment to degrade and deprive him publickly of his Honour of Knighthood for it is but with life leas'd or taken away Mills 81. by ungirding his Military Girdle by taking away his Sword and broken his Spurs cut off with an Hatchet his Gauntlets pluck't from him and the Escocheons of his Arms reversed And in the Statute made 24 Hen. 8. chap. 13. entituled an Act for Reformation of Apparel It was permitted for Knights to wear a Collar of Gold named the Collar of SS And although this Dignity of Knighthood had its original and was given to men of War and Prowess yet in all Successions of Ages and in all Nations the same also is bestowed upon men of Peace by the Sovereign Power to deserving persons whereby the Service of the Commonwealth at home is made equal with that abroad For as Tully saith truly Parvi sunt arma foris nisi est consilium domi But Experience the faithfullest Counsellor and best Mistress hath made it manifest both in this modern Age as well as in that of Tullie's that the Camp hath bred more eminent Statesmen and happily as good Politicians as the long Robe Perhaps for this Reason one aims chiefly at Glory and Honour which easily attracts admirers and favourers the other at Riches and indirect Negotiations which begets Envy and private Enemies He that receiveth the Dignity of a Knight kneeleth down and then the King slightly smiteth him upon his Shoulder and saith unto him these words in French Sois Chivaler au nome de Dieu and afterwards saith moreover Avance Chivaler See the Book of Titles of Honour due to the Earl-Marshal for the making of Knights 176. For a Knight is not made by Letters Patents or by the King 's Writ as those of higher Dignity but by the Sword for this Honour is supposed to be given on the sudden and therefore is commonly done by the Sword although the King may by his Letters Patents create a Knight Earls in ancient times had a power of Knighting but now neither may the Prince or any other of the Nobility make a Knight but only the King or Lieutenant General by his Commission No man is born a Knight as he may be to Titles of Honour by Patent but a Knight may be made assoon as a Child is baptized except Knight Bannerets Note the printed Book of Titles of Honour fol. 218 313. the first Knight With us in England there are divers sorts of Knights whereof Cambden 171. and Mills do write at large But amongst the Romans there was but one Order of them and they were next in Degree unto the Senators And they who simply without any Addition be called Knights howsoever they are in order ranked last yet by institution they are first and of greatest Antiquity and the other Orders are but late Attributes according to the several inventions of particular Princes And I do not remember that in our Books of Law I have read any thing concerning the Order of Knights with Addition viz. Knights of the Honourable Order of the Garter Knights Bannerets and Knights of the Bath But in the Statute 12 Hen. 8. cap. 13. it is enacted That every Knight of the Garter may have three Chaplains whereof every one may purchase licence or dispensation and receive have and keep two Benefices with cure of Souls but they of this Order which I now treat of are called Knights of the Spur or Knights Batchelors Between Doctors of the Civil Law and Knights hath ever been question for precedency since either of them hath been in credit in the Common-wealth as may appear both by the Comparison that Tully maketh between Lucius Murena a Knight of Rome and Publius Sulpitius a Lawyer either of them standing for Consulship in his Eloquent Oration made for Murena and many Disputes of Bardal and Bardus arguing the Case Pro and Con which though it be disputable in Foreign Parts yet here in England it is without Controversie and the precedency thereof is undoubtedly the Knights But if they be both of equal degree of Knighthood then
Domini sui ei conferet maritagium suum c. which words cannot be understood when he is out of Ward and Custody no more than when he is married after the Age of One and twenty years Note hereby that the King may prevent his Grantee or other Lords of the double value by Knighthood Yet in such case presently after the Heir is made a Knight after the death of his Ancestor the Lord may have a Writ de valore maritagii for the single Also by the ancient Common Law of this Realm if a Villain be made a Knight he is immediately infranchised And if a Ribald or a man of base birth and condition had struck a Knight by the ancient Law he should have lost his hand wherewith he offended But in France it was anciently adjudged that when the Lord of a Villain had Knighted his Villain being a Gentleman he became free and had his Honour lawâ—ully but if another Lord had Knighted him nothing had been wrought by it for none could manumit him but his Lord and till Manumission or Knighthood he had civil freedom for his ground but was not capable of it except by the King only It was enacted by Parliament in the sixth year of the Reign of King Iohn in haec verba Rex Vicecom c. Sciatis quod consensum est cum assensu Archiepiscoporum Comitum Baronum omnium fidelium nostrorum Angliae quod novem Milites per totam Angliam invenient decuriam Militum bene paratorum aequis armis ad defensionem Regni nostri There hath ever been and still is great use of the Services of Knights even in Civil Affairs and concerning matters of Justice as in a Writ of Right which is the highest Writ in Law for trial of Titles touching the Inheritance of Lands the Tenant is at his Election to have his Trial by great Assize or else by Battel if by the great Assize the Writ De magna Assiza eligenda shall be thus viz. Rex Vicecomiti salutem c. Summone as per bonos summonitores quatuor legales Milites de Comitatu tuo quod sint coram Iusticiariis nostris ad primam Assizam cum in partes illas venerint ad eligendum super sacramentum suum 12 de militibus de visum de N. qui melius sciant velint dicere veritatem adfaciendam recognitionem magnae assurae inter A. petent B. tenent de uno messuagio cum pertinentiis in N. unde idem B. qui tenens est posuit secum magnam Ass. nostram petit recognitionem fieri utrum eorum habent jus in messuagium praed B. qui tunc sit ibi auditurus illam electionem habeas ibi nomina praed milit ad hoc breve c. And upon the Return of this Writ those four Knights must appear gladiis cuncti Dier 79. fol. 103. If the Tenant make his Election by Battel each parties are to choose their Champions and the Court shall award the Battel and the Champions shall be at Mainprize and sworn to perform the Battel at a certain day in the Term and idem dies shall be given to the parties at which day and place a List shall be made in an even and plain Ground there quadrant that is to say every way sixty foot square and the Place or Court for the Justices of the Common Pleas without and upon the Lists furnished with the same Clothes which belong to their Court at Westminster and a Barr shall be there made for the Serjeants at Law and the Robes of the Justices and Serjeants shall be of Scarlet with their Coifs on as it was the Thirteenth of Eliz. and then was made Proclamation with three O Yes And the Demandant first was solemnly demanded and did not appear whereupon the Manuperors of the Champion were demanded to bring forth the Champion of the Demandant who came into the place apparelled with red Sandals upon his black Armour bare legged from the Knee downwards and bare headed and bare Arms to the Elbows being brought in by a Knight namely Sir Ierom Bowes who carried a red Battoon of an ell long tipped with horn and a Yeoman carrying the Target made of double Leather and they were brought in at the North side of the Lists and went about the sides of the Lists until they came to the midst of the Lists and then came towards the Barr before the Justices with three solemn Congies and there was he made to stand on the South side of the place being the right side of the Court And after that the other Champion was brought in in like manner at the South side of the Lists with like Congies by the hands of Sir Henry Chequie Kt. c. and was placed on the North side of the Barr and two Serjeants being of the Counsel of each part in the midst between them This done the Demandant was solemnly called again and appeared not but made default Bowham Serjeant for the Tenant prayed the Court to record the Nonsuit quod factum fuit And then Dyer Chief Justice reciting the Writ and Content and Issue joyned upon the Battel and the other of the Champions to perform it and the prefiction of this day and place did give final Judgment against the Demandant and that the Tenant should have the Land to him and to his Heirs for ever and the Demandant and his Pledges de prosequendo in misericordia Reginae And afterwards solemn Proclamation was made that the Champions and all others there present which were by estimation above Four thousand persons might depart every man in the peace of God and the Queen sic fecerunt cum magno clamore vivat Regina Also if false Judgment be given in the Country which is the Sheriffs Court then the Writ shall be thus Henricus c. Vicecomiti Lincoln salutem Si A. fecerit c. tum in pleno Comitatu tuo per breve nostrum de recto inter Iohannem L. petentem Will B. tenentem de uno messuagio centum acris terrae cum pertinentiis in C. unde idem I. L. queritur falsum sibi factum fuisse Iudicium in eodem Record illud habeas coram Iusticiariis Iuris apud Westminsterium tali die sub sigillo tuo per quatuor legales Milites ejusdem comitatus illos qui Recordo illi interfuerunt summoneas per bonos summonitores praedictum B. quod tunc sit ibi auditurus Recordum illud habeas ibi sua nomina quatuor militum hoc breve Fitz. Nat. Brev. itidem E. And those four must be Knights indeed Also the Justices upon consideration of the usual words in every Writ of Venire Facias Coram c. Duodecim tum Milites quam alios liberos legales homines c. say that these words tum Milites were not at the first put into the Writ without effect Plowden 117. b. For it seemeth that in diebus
illis some Knights were returned upon every Venire Facias By the Statute of Magna Charta cap. 12. It is ordained that Assizes of Novel Disseison and Mortdancester should not be taken any where but within the Countries where they happen by the Justices of Assize and the Knights of the Shire vide Westminster 2. chap. 30. And by the Seven and twentieth of Edward the First chap. 30. de finibus levandis amongst other things it is enacted That for the utility of the Realm and the more assured conservation of the Peace the Justices assigned to take Assizes in all Shires where they take Assizes as it is ordained immediately after the Assizes taken in the Shires shall remain both together if they be Lay and if one of them be a Clerk then one of the most discreet Knights of the Shire being associated unto him that is a Lay-man by our Writ shall deliver the Goals of the Shires as well within the Liberties as without of all manner of Prisoners after the form of the Goal Delivery of those Shires beâ—ore time used Also in the Statute of Westminster 21. cap. 38. de non ponendis in Assizis Iuratis it is provided that the said Statute shall not extend to Grand Assizes in which it behoveth many times Knights to pass not resident in the County for the scarcity of Knights so that they have Lands in the Shire And by the Law Knights having Land may be returned upon Juries in ordinary Trials between party and party as other Freeholders may be And therefore in a Challenge to the great Assize under Edward the Third one was challenged pur ceo qu'il fait abaner or as the Abridgment hath it a Baronet but it was not allowed and the Reason is given Car s'il soit à Baner ne tient pas per Baronie il serra en l'assise Of the double parity of England that is of Barons and all Dignities above them being Peers of the Realm and all other under them are Peers amongst themselves for notwithstanding that Dignity of Knighthood they are reckoned amongst the Commons And we daily see that Knights do serve in Parliament as Members of the Commonalty Nevertheless the Sheriff in his discretion will not impannel Knights but in special and great Causes As in Cases of Indictments of a Peer of the Realm they are to be enquired and found by Knights and Esquires though their Trial shall be only by their Peers And in 38 Hen. 8. Henry Howard Earl of Surrey Son and Heir apparent of Thomas Duke of Norfolk was attainted of High Treason and was tried also by Knights Esquires and Gentlemen and not by Lords or Peers of the Realm because he was not of that Dignity by Creation Since the use of making every Earl first a Baron of some place which began as most Writers treat about the time of Henry the Eighth it hath been a Custome to style their Heirs apparent Lords and Barons with the Title of their Father's Barony when Viscounts or Baron's Heirs apparent are only styled Esquires but this is only a piece of Civility and of meer fashion yet it is allowed of in Heraldry with whom the Rule is That the eldest Son of every one of a created Degree is as of the next Degree under him which may be applied to Dukes Earls and the like But in Legal Proceedings they enjoy no such matter nor have by their being Heirs Apparent any Prerogative of the greater Nobillty And in case where a Peer of the Realm is party Plaintiff or Defendant in any Action or Suit if the Sheriff do not return one Knight at the least to be of the Jury the said Noble Person may Challenge and for that only cause quash the whole pannel By the Statute of Carlisle 15 Edw. 2. it was enacted That he who levied a Fine should appear in proper person to the intent that his Age Idiocy or other defect might be discovered by the Judges Nevertheless upon Impotency whereby he cannot come in Court two or one of the Justices by the consent of the rest of the Justices shall go unto him and take his Recognizance and if but one of them go he shall take a Knight with him and shall certifie it in the Bench of Record to the intent that all things incident to the fine be examined by them and then the fine may be levied But after this good Statute a worse Custom and Use hath come in place For by a Dedimus potestatem out of Chancery to one Knight and to a Justice of the Peace of the County in such cases is procured and directed to a Knight and two others who perhaps be neither Knights nor Justices but perhaps men of small estimation and unto two or three of them without saying Quorum the Knight shall be one and two of them without the Knight have taken the Recognizance of the Fine ibid. 101. b. But great prejudice this practise of omitting the interposing of the usual Service of Knights in this behalf hath been to many and scandalous to the Law of the Land they sometimes taking Recognizances of a Fine from a Feme Covert as if she were sole and many times acknowledged by Justices If a Tenant do lay an Essoin de morbo lecti he may have a Writ out of the Chancery to warrant it by which it shall be commanded to four Knights to view him and if they see him sick then they are to give him day to the end of a year and a day Note the Register fol. 177. b. Quod Coronator non elegatur nisi sit miles in c. juxta formam Statuti Westm. 1. cap. 10. It is a received Opinion that Knights are excused from attendance at Leets and Britton 29. 36. is cited to prove it And by a large understanding of the intent and meaning of the Statute of Marlbridge chap. 10. For the ancient Common Law had such respect to the Degree of Knighthood that they nor their eldest Sons were compelled to find Pledges in the Leet or Law-days for the Statute of Marlbridge aforesaid was not Introductiva novae Legis for it was before the Conquest And the Common Law is not by this Statute abridged And by the Book called the Mirror of Iustice mentioned in the Preface to Coke's ninth part it is said that Knights are excepted And so it appears that the practice was as well before as immediately after the making of that Statute of Marlbridge and Interpretatio Practica is a principal way and form of Interpretation of Laws The Lord Chancellor's Speech in the Case of Postnati fol. 58. And in Divinity Praxis sanctorum est interpretatio praeceptorum ibid. 66. But a Knight and all Superiors and Inferiors are bound by Law to attend the County or Sheriffs Court wherein he dwelleth and at his peril to take notice of the proceedings thereof For if a Man be Outlawed of Felony at a County Court and one of the same County not