trauerser loffice ou auterment mre son droit et illeoques maunde deuaunt le roye a faire final discussion sauns attender auter maundement This statute speakes bothe of trauerse and Monstrance de droit disiunctiuely whereby a man may gather that if Monstraunce de droit were not by thorder of the common law as it is saide 13. E. 4. f. 8. that it is yet were it geeuen by this estatute And no booke that beares date before this statut can I find that treates any thing of Monstraunce de droit Wherfore without preiudice to anye mans oppinion mine oppinion is that it is geuen onely by this statute but whether it bee so or not so I doe not greatly force Let vs see what it is in what cases it lieth If the kinge bee entitled by office or other matter of recorde that is trauersable Howbeit there is no cause of trauerse for that the office or recorde is true in this case anye manne that hath right to the possession of the freeholde of this lande whiche in shewinge of his right is able to confesse this office and auoid it shal bee receyued if hee bee putte out of hys possession or greeued thereby to come into the Chauncerie and shewe his saide right which beinge there proued to be true iudgement shal bee geeuen that the kinges handes be amoued from the possession of the saide landes with the meane issues and proftes to be restored vnto the party that sueth the said Monstraunce de droit As for an example it is founde by office that the kinges tenaunt by knightes seruice in chiefe dyed seised of certeine landes whiche are descended to his heir being within age where in dede in his life time I recouered this land against him and suing no execution suffred him to dye seised therof now vpon this office returned into the Chauncerie shall I come shewe my right that is to saye this recouere and auerre that this lande founde by office is the lande that I recouered or parcell thereof which being so proued and tried I shall haue an Ouster le maine Like law it is if the kings tenaunt disseised me of those landes and I made my continuall claime or that I had title to enter for condicion broken into the saide landes in the life of the kinges tenaunt and I entred and after was disseised by him But quere if I did not enter in his life whether now I may bee holpen by a Monstraunce de droit vppon the kinges possession And me thinkes not because I haue noe righte in that case till I enter for vntill that time the right continueth still in hym so that the kinge then hath a right ere I haue a right which ought too bee preferred and take place since it is but for a tyme before myne And for these cases see the booke in .3 H 7. fo 2. But if the king bee entitled by matter of worde not trauersable as if he be entytled by double matter of record in this case I can not haue my Monstraunce de droit no more than I can haue in the like case of Trauerse vnlesse my title be founde by one of the saide recordes As take the case to bee It is founde by office that one suche that holdeth of the kinge disseised mee and then committed a felonye vppon whome I entred after whiche entrie the saide tenaunt was attainted of the felonye in this case I shal haue the lande out of the kings hands by a Monstrance de droit causa qua supra And yet the kinges tytle is here by a record and not trauersable that is to saye thatteinder But what than My tytle is also founde by office and appeareth by matter of recorde M. 3. E. 4. 26 A. 4. H. 7. 6 whych beynge proued true doth clearelye auoide the kyngs possession and that is the reason I shall be receiued in thys case to a Monstraunce de droit as appeareth in .3 Edward 4. And therewith agreeth the booke 4. Henry 7. where kyng Richard the thirde was attainted of Treason by act of Parliament and found by office that he was seised of certeine land cometh one B. and saith that in the saide Parliament it was enacted that an atteinder of treason had against the father of the saide B. shoulde bee auoided and adnulled and hee restored to his landes and that these lands cōprised in the office were in the hands of the said king R. by attainder of his father aiudged that vpon this Monstraunce de droit the party should haue restituciō because his right appered by mater of record Like law is it wher it is found by office that such a one is attainted of felony is seised of such landes which are holden of the king nowe he that hath cause to sue his Monstraunce de droit can not be admitted therunto by reason of these two records Howbeeit if it bee so that there is noe suche attainder in deede then may the party that would sue a Monstraunce de droit saye that there is no suche recorde of attainder which beeinge founde true hee shal be receiued to his Monstraunce de droit as appeareth in the saide booke .4 H. 7. For nowe is there no recorde against him but onelye the office and notwithstandinge that by thoffice thattaindour is founde yet this fyndinge makes nothinge for the kinge if it bee vntrue For the iurie can neuer finde a matter of recorde and if they doe it is to little purpose for the recorde is euer triable by it selfe and if there bee suche a recorde it will appeare thoughe they fynde it not and if there bee none the finding of it is voide This may you see that a Monstrance de droit lyeth sometimes althoughe the kynge bee entytled by double matter of recorde if it so bee that the parties tytle appeare by matter of recorde or else it lyethe not M 14. E. 4. f. 1. 7 And yet Choke Littleton and Nedham helde oppinion in .14 E. 4. that if it bee founde before theschetour that one was tenant in taile of certeine landes holden of the kinge the remaynder to another in fee and that hee in the remainder is outlawed of felonye and that tenaunt in taile is dead without issue where in dede he beinge tenant in taile before the statute De donis condicionalibus after that hee hadde issue enfeffed one B. in this case the saide B. shall shewe this matter and that the vtlagarie was after the feffement made and so haue the landes out of the kinges handes by a Monstraunce de droit But it shoulde seeme their oppinion is againste the lawe and the bookes beefore rehersed vnlesse this feffement were founde by office Peticion .12 Trauers .7 because it appearethe that the kinge in this case is entytled by double matter of recorde And note that where the kinge is entitled but by office alone there the partye maye haue his Monstraunce de droit althoughe his title bee
firste chapter Also Britton an other old wryter which wrote hys booke in king Edwarde the first name sayeth des heirs nequedent si ils y eyent ascuns qui auncestre morust seisie de ascun terre tenu de nous en chief des aunciens demeanes de nostre corone volons auer les gardes de touts les terres dōt appent que deiuent descend a ceux heirs come lour heritage ouesque touts les blees en teles terres troues maintefoits de qui fees que les terres sont Britton here not only agreeth with the other but also geueth the king the corne growing vpon the groundes which the kinges tenant holdeth at the tyme of his death A. 21. H. 3. in Fitz. ti Prerogat ' P. 26. P. 25. Also in the great Abridgement of Fitzherbert you shal find in the time of king Henry the thirde written in this manner Nota quod lex angliae et consuetudo eiusdē est quod a quibuscunque aliquis feoffatus fuerit dum tamen a domino Rege aliquo tempore fcoffatus fuerit per tenementum qd ' tenetur per seruic̄ militare quod dn̄s rex habebit custod ' omniū terrar ' et tenemētorū tā de feoffamēto aliorū quā de feoffamento proprio Which text if a man will any thing wrest he may make the kinges prerogatiue more lyberall then is made or declared by this statute or any other the writters before remembred for it extendes to any landes holden of the king by knightes seruice whether they be holden of the king in capite or not but forasmuche as the saide other writers haue written so plainlye in this matter we will stand to them and extende the prerogatiue no further howbeit as I saide all those writters being so longe before the making of this statute doe plainly argue proue that this statute dothe but confirme and declare that that was the commen law before M 15. E 4.12 vnles we woulde doubt of the time of the making thereof as Littleton doth in 15. E. 4. but without doubt it was made in king Edward the secondes time and that plainlye appeareth by the woordes contayned in the third chapter of this prerogatiue which be these Et illa voluntas tempore Regis H. patris Regis E. estimari consueuit c. Which woordes were not written in kinge Edward the first daies for then the woords had bene patris nostri so that as I thinke it is not to bee doubted but that it was written in the time aboue limitted and expressed Then go wee to thexposicion of this first chapiter of prerogatiue The woords be dominus rex habebit custodiam omnium terrarum eorum qui de ipso tenent in capite per seruicium militare These woordes go generally to all the kings tenauntes that is to saye aswell to his tenantes for terme of lyfe as to his tenauntes of estate of enheritaunce if it so be that he that is in the reuercion haue the saide reuercion by discent and be heir vnto the said tenant for terme of life not forcing whether he haue the reuercion by discent from the said tenaunt for terme of life or else from any other ancestour as take the case to be this a man holdeth no landes of the kinge but onely as tenaunt by the curtesie and those landes are holden in chiefe by knightes seruice the saide tenaunt by the curtesie is seased in his demesne as of fee of landes holden of other lordes and dieth the landes holden of other discend vnto him in the reuertion whiche is indede nexte heire vnto the said tenant by the curtesie in this case the king shall not onely haue the wardship of the landes that were holden by the curtesie if the saide heire be wythin age but also the landes holden of other by vertue of thys prerogatiue And if the saide heire were of full age at the tyme of the deathe of the saide tenaunt by the curtesie the king shall haue primer season both of the one lande and of the other as it appeareth in the newe Natura breuiū fo 298. Like lawe is it if a woman be indowed of lands holden in capite and is seased in fee simple of landes holden of other and dieth seased and they discende vnto the heire whiche is in the reuercion in this case the kinge shal haue bothe these landes by vertue of this prerogatiue like as hee shall haue in the other case before 26. li. ass p. 57 and that maye you see in 26. li. ass for in bothe these cases they bee the kinges tenauntes and hold of him by knightes seruice in capite for tenaunt en dower in the kinges cas holdeth not of the heire but onelye of the kinge as it shal appeare more fully hereafter But if he in the reuercion bee not heire of the landes holden of other in the cases aboue remēbred otherwise it is But what if he in the reuercion haue the same reuercion by purchace and not by discent whether shall the king then haue his prerogatiue or not and as to that it shoulde seeme by the newe Natura breuium fo 259. that the kinge shall haue his prerogatiue in that case also for there the remainder was to the heire and to his wife and to the heires of theire two bodyes lawfully begotten and the husbande in the remainder dyd sue liuere howbeit against the law as me semeth ideo quere but if the case in the saide newe Natura breuium had been that landes holden by knightes seruice in capite had beene geuen to one for terme of his lyfe the remainder ouer in fee which parson in the remainder hath issue and dyeth and tenaunt for terme of lyfe holdeth landes of other Lordes and dyeth whiche discende to the issue that is in the remainder there it might be saide that the king shoulde haue prerogatiue in the whole like as he had in the cases before remembred of tenaunt by the curtesie and tenant in dower for like reason will serue in the one case that serueth in the other The woordes of the Statut be further de quibus ips◠tenētes fuerunt seisiti in dominico suo vt de feodo die quo obierunt de quocunque tenuerint These woordes rather apperteigne vntoo the landes holden of other then too the Landes holden of the Kinge in Capite as it shoulde appeare by the cases beefore remembred and then by these woordes the kinges tenaunt in his life tyme must himselfe bee seased either in possession or reuercion of those landes that hee holdeth of a common person that shall dyscende vnto his heire For if hee were neuer seased thereof but they discende vnto his heire from some other auncestor the king shall not haue his prerogatiue in them as appeareth in 15. 15. E. 4. f. 10. E. 4. but whether the kinges tenaunt were seased of them in his owne right or in another bodyes right it maketh no difference
if the laÌ„ds excede the yerely value of .xx. marks he must sue a specyal liuerie not a general therfore it makes no mater for the inquisitioÌ„ or office that the words of the statute wil beare it wel enough if there be but one office fouÌ„d But as to that it may be sayd that the meaning of the statute was not so for the kinge can neuer be fulli eÌ„formed of his title vnlesse ther be an office fouÌ„d in euery shere also by finding of seueral offices one record may be better for the kinge then an other whereof his grace may take auaÌ„tage for the best shal be takeÌ„ for the kinge Thus it appereth by statut how that of landes aboue the yereli value of vli inquisicioÌ„ must be made and an office found after the death of the kinges tenant be fore liuerie can be had and that must be by a writ of dieÌ„ clau sit extremum for that is the proper writ that is to be sued for that purpose if any sute be made within the yeare after the kinges tenants death or a special commission in the nature of the writ of diem clausit For vpon a general coÌ„missioÌ„ to enquire generally of all wards no perticular person can haue liuere And if he tarry till after the yere then he caÌ„not pursue any of these but for his remedie must sue a writ called Mandamus or a commission in nature of that writ and therupon to cause an office to be fouÌ„d and so to haue liuerie But if an office be once found by diem clausit and the heier dieth in the kinges ward his heir must sue Deuenerunt no Mandamus although it be after the yere of the death of him that dyed in ward and so is the rule in the register Sumetymes it happeneth that after deliuerie of the writ or commission and before office found theschetor dyeth or is remoued froÌ„ his office in which case then the proces that is awarded to his successor is a writ called Datur nobis intelligi but if office be fouÌ„d before his death or remouing which office is not returned then shall therbe a certiorari awarded to his executors to returne the same For it is a mater of record as sone as the iurrors haue put their seales vnto it notwtstanding it be not returned And note the thawardig of this writ of diem clausit or special coÌ„missioÌ„ is peremptorie to him the sueth for it For if he lese it or be taken froÌ„ him with force he gettes no moe writs or coÌ„missioÌ„s for the lands in that couÌ„tie and this appereth in the new Natura breuiuÌ„ fo 2â—â— Howbeit in 14. E. 4 it is touched by the waye that in such cases he should haue a new writ H. 14. E. 4. so 5. ideo quere But after office ones fouÌ„d by a dieÌ„ clausit or specyal commissioÌ„ as well the kinge partie therby are bouÌ„d as euery other straÌ„ger for somuch laÌ„des as are comprised within the office and neither the kinge ne that partie nor any other shal haue any moe writs or coÌ„missioÌ„s to enquire any further of these lands except it be in such cases as I shal hereafter recite for so the lawe shoulde neuer haue end but newe heires might be founde euery daye by office which were incoÌ„uenient and the king should not knowe to wheÌ„e to make liuerie this appereth .14 E. 4. and 2. et 4. 14. E. 4. f. 5 2. H. 7. f. 2. 4. 4. H. 7. f. 13. H. 7. But where after office found it is surmised for the kinge that his highnes hath a better title than was found for him by the first office whether the mater surmised may stand with the mater fouÌ„d by the first office or not yea although it be mere coÌ„trariaÌ„t or repugnaÌ„t it is not material But in such cases a new writ or coÌ„missioÌ„ shal be awarded As take the case to bee this By the first office it is found the kinges tenaunt in chiefe dyed seised his heir wtin age where in dede hee dyed without heir so that therby the lands ought to haue escheted to the kinge or that he was tenaÌ„t in taile dyed without issue of his body wherby the lands ought to haue reuerted vntoo the kinge in these cases the court shal awarde a new writ or coÌ„missioÌ„ for the kinge Like law is it where the daughter is fouÌ„d heir by office afterward the sonne is borne or where ther is but one daughter found heire by office where there ought to haue ben two fouÌ„d heires or if by the first office one is fouÌ„d heire of ful age which is not heir in dede but an other is heir which is within age In all these cases ther shal be a new writ or coÌ„missioÌ„ awarded Causa qua supra 14. E. 4. f. 5 4. H. 7. f. 13. as it may appere .14 E 4. et 4. H. 7. 12. R. 2 et 30. li. ass yea and a more stroÌ„ger case as it should appere in the new Natura breuium fo 2â—â— fo 2â—2 et f 295. that is to say where the kinge was to haue no benefit at all more then he had by the first office and yet a newe commission was awarded and therfore the case was there the second brother was founde heir by the first office of ful age now the eldest had a commission being also of full age to finde him heir and thervpon had his liuery So is it where 2. be fouÌ„d daughters and heirs to one maÌ„ of certain laÌ„ds where in dede parcel of the said land was geuen to one of the said 2. daughters in fraÌ„k mariage now she that claimed the frank mariage had a specyall coÌ„mission to enquire of the saÌ„e and yet by that second office the king had no benefit ideo quere For this Natura breuiuÌ„ semeth to impugne the bokes before rehersed And like as he may pray a newe writ or coÌ„mission in the cases aboue rehersed before liuerie had euen so may he do in the like cases after liuere had if the liuerie be a general liuerie therupoÌ„ as sone as the title is found the king shal rescise but not wtout a Scire facias because the statut made at Lincoln hath so prouided as I shall open more fully when I come too that place and that in all these aforesayd cases a new diem clausit may be as wel awarded as a new coÌ„mission as it appereth titulo Trauser in Fitz. pl ' 28. anno 29. li. Asss ¶ What thing shal be in the king without office or seasure what not and where by an office only without any seasure or other proces the kinge shal be in possessioÌ„ and where not and where he shal be in possession without an office but not before a seasure and how the kinge may be eÌ„titled by any other recorde as well as by an office and where a man may enter as well vpon the kynges
in this case if ther bee an other record found that proueth the landes to be holden of the kinge in capite vppō these .ii. records together proces shal be made against the partie by Scire facias to come and shewe why he should not make a fine for the alienacion Like lawe it is where there is a record to proue that he that aliened is but tenant in taile of the kinges gift and he pretendinge to be tenant in fee simple doth purchace a licence of alienaciō and a lienethe and after dyethe without issue which deathe is founde by office but nothinge of his state taile or lycence appeareth in the sayde office yet vpon all these recordes laied together the king shal haue a Scire facias against the alienee to show why the land should not be seised in to his handes and his highnesse aunswered of the profites since the death of tenaunt in taile for when hee was but tenaunt in tayle it appearethe that the lycence was pourchased vpon false suggestyon and so voyde 40. li. assise in Fit ti Garde P. 1. and thenne the landes ought to reuerte to the kynge beecause hys reuercion coulde not bee discontinued And this maye yowe see 40. li. ass Then laste of all it is to bee seene whether the possession may bee taken from the kynge bye entrye or not And as to that yf the kynges possession bee by matter of recorde noe persone can dysseise hym or take the possession from hym for lyke as the kynge maye not take by gyfte from anye persone but by matter of recorde noe more maye the possession departe from hym but by matter of recorde and therefore his hyghnes cā not haue assise or Electione firme siue custodie lyke as a common persone maye yea and thoughe the entrie bee not immedyatlye vppon hym but vppon his committee or fermer yet it is noe disseisin to his hyghnesse as it appearethe 4. H 7. folio 2. M. 2. H. 4. M. 14. E. 4. folio 35. H. 6. in Fits titulo Suggestion P. 9. 2 M. 35. H. 6. folio 1 Bye the whiche sayde booke of 35. it also appearethe that if the kynge or hys commyttee bee cast oute of the wardeshyppe of the landes that the remedy is in thys manner that is to saye vppon suggestion thereof made in the Chauncerye there shal bee awarded a wrytte called Amoueas manum and that vppon a certaine payne whyche wrytte maye bee awarded onelye vppon this suggestion wythoute anye presentmente or enquirie and thys writte maye bee graunted to the committee as well beefore possession hadde of the warde as after for where the kynge was once possessed by office and grauntes it ouer yet this possession styll remaines for the kynge abydeth stil gardeyne notwythstandynge anye such graunt And therefore this writte of Amoueas sub pena lyethe for the grauntee or committee although the graunt be absque aliquo inde reddendo And if vppon this writte of Amoueas the defendant do not restore the thing then shall goe out againste him an attachement vpon which writ the defendant maye appeare and shewe his title which if it be founde agaynste him he shall then make restitucion by iugement and paye a fyne and aunswere the meane issues profites Thus dothe it appeare that the king cannot be disseised or eiected if his highnesse bee once seised by mater of recorde Otherwyse it is before his seisin bee by mater of recorde for if beefore office a straunger entre by title or without title this is no intrusion vpon the kinges possession but in this case the heire may haue Assise of mort dauncester againste the straunger if hee will whiche proues that by his entrie hee hath gottē bothe a freeholde and a fee simple But as sone as the office is founde and the eschetoure entreth this possession of the straunger whiche entred witheoute title is clerely vndone and the freeholde and the fee simple reuested in the heyre But if the entrie of the straunger weare by title and afterwarde office is founde and the kynge seisethe whether then it bee so or noe learne And it shoulde seeme to bee all one or els the kynges seisure is not good for howe can the kynge seise in an other bodyes ryghte if the ryghte weare taken awaye beefore by an entrie therefore it shoulde seeme eyther hys highnesse hathe noe title in that case to seise or els by his seisure the freeholde and the fee simple muste reuest in the heire But note that if the kynge wyll bye coloure of a recorde seyse an other mannes lande whiche recorde geeues him noe title in deede notwythestandynge anye suche seysure yet hee that hathe righte maye entre vppon the kynge and bye his entrie reuestes agayn in himselfe bothe the freeholde and fee simple as where it is foūd the kynges tenaunte dyed seysed but of an estate for terme of lyfe the reuersion to an other and thys notwythestandynge the kynge seisethe in this case if hee in the reuersion entre vppon the kynge this is a good entrie and therefore the case was hee made a feffement after his entrie and it was thoughte to be a good feffemēt Like law is it where the kynge is entitled but onelye to the profites as vppon an vtlagarie in a parsonall action or vpon the conuiction of a clerke in these cases if the partie entre and make a feffemēt or if a straunger that hathe title to entre do entre hee dyschargeth the kynge of hys interest and of these maters Trauers 12. Assise 156. you shal find bokes 8. H. 4. f. 16. 21. E. 3. f 1. 3 H. 7. 10. E. 3. 27. ass P 15. 9. H. 6. f. 20. 21. H. 7. f. 7. Enterpleder SOmetyme it happenethe that by two seuerall offices founde in one countie seuerall parsones be seuerallye founde heires to one man wherebye forasmuche as the kinge is brought in doubt to whiche of them his hyghnesse maye make liuerie they therefore muste firste enterplede and when by enterpleder the priuitie of the bloode is tried beetweene them then his highnesse oughte to make the liuerye to him that is tryed to bee the nexte heire of him that dyed As for an example by one Diem clausit or specyall commission in one countie one is founde heire to hym that dyed the kyngs tenant and of full age and by an other Diem clausit or speciall commissiō in the same countie one other is founde heire also to hym that dyed and within age in this case the heire that was firste founde shal haue a Scire facias in the chauncerie against hym or her that was last foūd heire to come shew why liuerie should not be made vnto hym that last dyed seised thereof vppon whiche writte yf a Scire feci be returned and the partye defendaunt cometh not or yf he come and confesse that he hymselfe is not heire then the plaintife in the Scire facias shal haue hys lyuerie but if hee come
as take the case he were seased of them but in right of his wife and hath issue and dyeth his issue is in the kinges warde for the lande that his father helde in Capite and afterwarde the wife dyeth the issue beynge still in warde the Kynge shall haue Prerogatiue in these landes of the wyfe also because the husband was seased of them in his demeane as of fee the daye of his deathe and so wythin the compasse of this statute And this case may you see in M. 13. H. 4. 6. 13. H. 4. and note that notwithstandinge this statute speaketh but of landes yet seruice are to bee taken by the equitie of the same as it is plainlye proued by the woordes of Diem clausit extremum which saieth Quantum terre tenet de nobis aut de aliis tam in dominico quam in seruicio So that if one holde of the kinges tenaunt by certeine seruices the King shal haue the seruices in warde for they be in nature and place of the lande that is holden and so shall it bee supposed And therefore when the kinge hath those seruices in warde and the tenaunt that holdeth by those seruices diâ—th his heire within age if the saide seruices were knightes seruice the Kinge shall haue warde by reason of wardshippe But yet by that noe prerogatiue in the other landes of the second warde whiche are holden of the other Lordes M. 6. R. 2. in Fitz. ti Gard P. 105. as it may appeare in 6. R. 2. For the kinges tenant was neuer seased of those other landes ne yet of the seruice that they were holden by and so without the compasse of this prerogatiue Like lawe it is where the Kinge hath the temporaltie of a bishop in his custody duringe the tyme the Sea is vacant and one that holdeth of those temporalties by knightes seruice dieth his heir wtin age the king shal haue the wardship of him the reason of it is because the king hath the wardship of the teÌ„poralties by reasoÌ„ wherof this wardship cometh whiche temporalties the kinge hath in warde by the order of the common lawe in lure corone For they bee barronies which can be holden of none other then of the kinge in capite and then by the common lawe I take it he were no better then a common person yet his highnes must haue the wardshippe of them that holde of those temporalties by knightes seruice if they falle duringe the time the saied temporalties be in his hands with such landes as they holde of those temporalties but not with such lands as theye holde of other and than must the heire thereof when he coÌ„meth to his ful age sue a liuere as shalmore plainly appeare when we come to the thirde chapiter of this prerogatiue The wordes of the statute before resited are in dominico suo this woorde demeane is not here taken to bee the verie possession or takyng of the profits for if the kinges tenauÌ„t dye seased but of a reuercion or of a remaynder in landes holden of a common person and duringe the minoritye of his sonne the particuler tenaunte dyethe the kynge this notwithstanding shall haue this lande in warde as he hath the rest as it may appeare 22. H. 6.15 E. 4. 46. E. â— M. 22. H. 6. f 20 M. 15. E. 4. f. 10. P. 46. E. 3. fo 10. So it is if the kinges tenaunt dye seased of an aduowson appendaunt to landes holden of a common person The woordes be further die quo obierunt and therefore if the kinges tenaunt dye seased of Landes holden of a commen persone and a straunger abbatethe yet the heire shal bee in warde and the kyng maye entre and so is it if the heire recouer by assise of nâ—ortdauncestre as it appeareth in the newe Natura breuium fol. 2â—â— T. 12. R. 2. But take the case to bee that the kinges tenaunte dye not seased but is disseised and dyethe whether in this case the kynge maye haue prerogatyue or not and it semethe that hee may for in all suche cases where the heire hath a right of entre the kynge may entre in name of the heire and holde it afterwarde in warde but yf the heire haue but a title of entre or ryghte of accion it seemethe to be otherwise howebeit looke for those maâ—â—ers in the sayde booke of 15. E. 4. 12. H. 7. 18. Edwardi tertii lib. ass P. 18. T. 12. H. 7. fo 17. Where it is adiudged that of landes holden of the kynge in chiefe the kynge as in ryghte of hys warde myghte sease by a Scire facias vppon a tytle of entre And note also that there is somewhat more to bee vnderstanden beare thenne is wrytten or expressed that is to saye that the saide Landes muste discende too the kynges warde for notwythestandynge the kynges tenaunt weare seased in hys demeane as of fee daye of hys deathe in landes holden of a commen persone yet if the same after hys deathe doe not discende to the kynges warde but to an other heire M. 12. E. 4. f. 18. the kynge shall not haue prerogatiue in them as it appearethe in 12. Ed. 4. The woordes of the statut bee also De quocunque tenuerunt Put case the kinges tenaunte is seased of certayne thynges whyche neyther are holden of the kynge nor yet of anye other whether shall the kyng haue them in warde or not as Merket warrâ—n A. 3. H. 7. f. 4 21. H. 6. f. 12. 46. E. 3. f. 10. 15. E. 4. f. 12. Rente Secke or aduowson en grosse and as it should appeare in 46. E. 3. 21. H. 6. the kynge cannot haue them in warde and yet in 15. Ed. 4. soome holde oppinion to the contrarye therefore inquere and learne what the lawe wil in these cases The woordes of the statute bee Per huiusmodi seruicium that is to saye by lyke seruice Bye these woordes the landes that are holden of other muste bee holden allso by knyghtes seruice or els the statute extendes not to them and yet the lawe is taken to the contrarye for yf the lands holden of other bee holden but in socage or free burgage the kynge shal haue prerogatiue in them as it appearethe in P. 24. E. 3. f. 13. T. 9. H. 3. ti Prerogatiue in fits â— 25. 24. E. 3. for this statute is but a confirmacion of the common lawe and therefore shall bee taken by equities and namelye when the lawe was so taken in 9. H. 3 whiche was longe time beefore the makyng of this statut Howebeit Bracton and Britton dothe extende this prerogatiue no further then to landes holden of other by knightes seruice therefore enquire for the cause and reason thereof Bracton li. primo de custod et releuiis Britton f. The woordes bee further Exceptis feodis archiepi cantuar ' c. This exception extendes not to the bodie wherefore the kynge shall holde that in warde
againste al men but it extendes to suche landes as are holden of these persones exempted by this statut Put case then that anie of these persones pourchace a seignorie since the tyme of the makynge of this statute shall the kynge haue hys prerogatiue in the landes holden of that seignorie or not And it is clere he shal notwithstandynge the aforesayde woordes of exception for theye doe not extende but to suche fees as we are theyrs at the time of the makynge of this statut Then further for asmuche as there bee diuers statutes concernynge wardeshyppe made aswell beefore as since the time of kynge Edwarde the seconde let vs see whether this prerogatiue wyl extende to those statutes or not and it seemethe it dothe for asmuche as this prerogatiue hathe beene euer from the beginninge as I haue sayde before And therefore if the kynges tenaunte beeinge seased of landes holden of a common parson makethe a feffement therof by collusion contrarie is the statute of Marlebridge to defraude the lord of the wardshippe and diethe the king hauing his heire in warde this matter founde by office shall sease vpon a Scire facias if the collusion be auerrable or wtout a Scire facias if the collusioÌ„ be apparaunt hold the same in warde by force of this prerogatiue that appeareth in 9. H. 4. So likewise wher the statute made in 4. H. 7. T. 9. H. 4. f. 5 prouidethe that the heire cesty que vse shall bee in warde Put case that the kynges tenaunte in capite before the statute in Anno. 27. H. 8. had made a ferfement of lands which he holdethe of a common perâ—one to the vse of hymselfe his heires and died before that statute in this case the kinge shoulde haue hadde his prerogatiue in the Landes so beynge put in feoffament to an vse euen as if his tenaunt had died seased thereof T. 12. H. 7. fo 17. as it appearethe 12. H 7. Than last of all let vs learne howe the lordes whose fees the kynge hathe in warde by his prerogatiue shal be demeaned and ordered for the rentes to be dewe for their seignories duringe the wardshippe whether they shall leese them as they do the landes 29. lib. ass in fits ti Petic p. 5. P. 24. E. 3 f. â—â— and the new natura breuium fo 179. And it appeareth in the booke of assises in 29. E. 3. that they had them by peticion at the Kynges hands therwith agreeth thoppinion of Hill ' in the .24 yere of kyng E. 3. Learne the reason of these bokes for it should seme to me the lawe to be otherwise because that al mesne seignories are suspended duringe the time the kyng hathe the tenauncye in warde if it bee not per case for the surplusage of a rent seruice whiche the mesne maye sue for to the kynge by waye of peticion and to saye that the heire shal be charged at his full age withe the sayde rentes it weare noe reason for then bothe his lande shoulde bee in warde and yet he charged to pay rent for the same wherefore it semeth that these bokes are against the law And with me agreeth Bracton in his first boke in the chapiter de custodia where he saieth Et cum tali ratione sint aliorum feoda in manu do mini regis pred' ratione alij capitales domini feod ' illorum ni hil poterint exigere de terris et tenÌ„tis illis nec in seruic ' nomi nat ' nec in auxiliis ad filiam maritandam vel filium primoge nit ' militem facieÌ„duÌ„ vel in sectis quaÌ„diu terre fuerunt in manu domini regis sed precipiet ' vic' qd ' hmÌ„odi distringere non permittat Howebeit Bracton in his said booke in the chapiter De releuijs saieth that the heire at his full age shall pay his reliefe to euerie of his lordes notwithstanding he hathe ben in warde quod nota for in al other cases he neuer paiethe reliefe that is to saye where he hathe bene in ward and hee makethe no other reason for it butte this s. quod hoc est speciale in rege propter suum priuilegium and so is the booke in the .24 M. 39. E. 3. in Fits ti Relief P. 1. Britton f. 163. yeare of kynge Edwarde the thyrde and the .39 yeare of the same kynge howebeit Brittons oppinion is that the heire shall paye noe reliefe to the other lordes after hee hathe beene in the kynges warde and commethe to his full age and I cannot fynde that the heire in anye suche case shoulde or doothe paye anye reliefe to the kynge that is to saye where hee hathe beene in warde therefore learn what experience teacheth vs in these cases The seconde chapiter ITem Rex habebit maritagium hered ' infra etateÌ„ in custodia sua existenÌ„ siue terre hered ' eorundem sint ab antiquo de corona siue de eschaetis quae sunt in manu domini Regis siue habuerit maritagium ratione custod ' terrarum dnÌ„orum eorundem hered ' nullo habito respectu ad prior ' feoffamenti licet de alijs tenuerunt Bracton li. 1. ti de herede sockman in cuius custodia esse debe at BrittoÌ„ f. 163 M. 24. E. 3. f. 24. H. 12. H. 4. in fits ti Gard. P. 81. All that is contayned in this Chapiter was the kynges prerogatiue by the order of the common lawe as it maye appeare in the bokes of Bracton and Britton in the places before noted and in a boke in the 24. yeare of kyng Edward the thyrde where it is sayde that no lorde can be more auncienter than the kynge for all was in hym and came from hym at the begynninge And therefore his highnesse muste haue prerogatiue in the bodye of whosoeuer the infaunte holdeth besides bee it that the landes are holden of the kynges highnes as of the auncientnes of his Corone or of hys newe escheates or come vnto hym as warde by reason of wardshippe or that his highnesse doe pourchace the seignorie of hym that is lorde by posterioritie or pourchaseth a manor holden of one of his honors whiche are of his newe eschetes of whiche maner thauncester of thinfaunt helde by posterioritie in all these cases the kynge shall bee preferred to the wardeshippe of the bodye and mariage beefore anye other lorde of whom the auncester also helde them daye of his death by priority of feffement that is to saye more auncient feoffement howe be it in these cases hys highenesse shall not haue wardeshippe in the landes holden of thother lordes beecause his tenaunte helde not of hym in châ—efe but onelye shall haue preferrement in the body and mariage beefore all other Then since the common lawe and statute dothe geue the kinge this prerogatiue let vs see whether his highnesse maye by grauntinge away his seignorie to an other graunt also with the same his prerogatiue to the grauntee that is to
for when the lyuerie is missued it is as it had beene neuer sued Howebeit thys reseisure shall not bee wytheoute a Scire facias as I shall thereof speake more at large hereafter But yf the heyre or he that should sue lyuerie doe make a rightfull suite for the same according to thorder of the lawe and asmuche as in hym lyethe to do to haue liuerye howebeeit the kynge will not but willbee aduised ere hee make hym lyuerie and so protracte the time in this case his highenesse of ryghte maye not haue the profites from the tyme the partye was thus delayed but ought to restore theÌ„ vnto the partye vppon his lyuerye as maye appeare in the firste yeare of Henrye the seuenthe H. 1. H. 7. in Fits ti Liuery P. 18. And thereuppon it is to be noted that there be two kynde of lyueries the one generall the other speciall The generall is the liuerye that this statut speketh of the especial may be more properly treated of when wee come to the 12. chapiter of this prerogatiue And this generall lyuerie is sometime made cum exitibus and sometimes sine exitibus but for the most parte sine exitibus for wheare it is made cum exitibus from the time of the seisure there it is properlye noe liuerye for it appearethe the kynge neuer seised rightfully or by anye title As for example if the kynge will seise the lande that is founde in thoffice to be holden of Tharchebyshoppe of Canterburye or Byshoppe of Durham or anye suche persones as are exempted in the first chapiter of this prerogatiue in this case they shal haue an Ouster le main vna cum exitibus H. 16. E. 3. in Fits ti Liuere P. 29 as it appearethe in 16. E. 3. The same lawe is it yf of landes holden in capite there be a lease made for terme of lyfe the remainder ouer to estraunger 14. H. 4. f. 34 18. E. 3. f. 21. 24. E. 3. f. 27. tenaunt for terme of lyfe dyâ—th and this matter founde by office nowe if the kynge seise hee in the remainder shall haue an Ouster le main vna cum exitibus as it appearethe in 14. H. 4. 18 E. 3. 24. Edwarde the thirde Like law it is where .ij. hold iointly of the king the one dyethe and this matter founde by office and yet that notwithstandynge the kynge seises hee that suruiues shall haue an Ouster le mayn vna cum exitibus as it appearethe in the boke of Assises 44. 44. li. ass in Fits ti Liuere P. 11. T. 45. E. 3. f. 18. E. 3. and in the newe Natura breuium fo 2â—â— f. 257. For in all these cases where the Ouster le maine is vna cum exitibus the king ought not to haue seiseised and so sayethe Thorp 45. E. 3. The words of the statute be further Post mortem eorum qui de eo tenent VpoÌ„ this it is to bee sene at what time after the kynges tenants deathe this lyuerie shall be sued If the possession of the free holde immediatlye after the deathe of the kynges tenaunte discende vnto his heire it is to bee sued fourthwithe and yf but onelye a reuercion discende then it is not to be sued tyl after the death of the particular tenaunt as it may appeare in the newe Natura breuium f. 291. where the heire sued not lyuerie tyll after the deathe of the tenaunt by the curtesye tenaunt in dower and tenaunt for terme of lyfe But learne what the lawe shoulde haue beene if the kynges tenant hadde dyed seised of a reuersion whereupon rent had beene reserued hys heire of full age whether hee should haue theÌ„ sued liuerie fourthwith or els to haue taried tyll the deathe of the particuler tenaunt for in the seuenthe yeare of kyng Henrye the sixte Iune thinks he should tary or els it might followe the kynge should haue double lyuerie that is to say one for the rent an other for the lande M. 7. H. 6. f. 3 but Paston is in contrarye opinion and resembles it to a reuersion dependyng vpon an estate tayle with a rent reserued howebeit at this daye there is election geuen vnto the heire that is to say eyther to sue his liuerie immediatly after the deathe of his auÌ„cester in the lyfe of these particuler tenaunts or els to tarye vntill they die and if he sue his lyuerie in theire lyfe he paiethe for primer seisin but the moytie of one yeares profyte yf after theire deathe then he payethe the hole yeares profit howebeit if there be a rent reserued he pursueth his liuery in the lyfe of the particular tenaunt it seemes besides the halfe yeres profit of the value of the land he shal also paye the hole yeares profit of the rent reserued therfore learn what common experience teacheth vs in that case The woordes of the statut be Qui de eo tenent in capite By these words he must holde of the kinge in chiefe for yf he holde not of hym in chiefe the kynge can haue noe primer seisin And yet you shal see in the newe Natura breuium folio 296. that of lands in the citie of LoÌ„don holden of the king in burgage the king had primer seisin the heire thereof sued his liuery but that president semes to bee against the lawe for Markham saiethe in 7. E. 4. that in Neuels case it was founde that ones father died seised of certain lande that hee helde of the kyng in Burgage T. 7. E. 4. f. 9 and thereupon thexchetor did seise whiche seiser by thaduise of all the Iustices was discharged by a Supersedeas awarded to thexchetor for the wordes of bothe the foresayde statutes be verye plaine therein that is to saye that hee must holde of the kynge in capite but whether he holde of the kyng by knights seruice or by Socage in capite it makethe noe matter so that he holde in capite for the kinge in bothe cases shall haue primer seisin althoughe not wyth so large a prerogatiue in th one case as in the other For in the firste case where the tenure is knyghtes seruyce in capite the kynge shall haue the same prerogatiue when the heire is of full age at the deathe of his auÌ„cester as he should haue hadde yf hee hadde beene wythin age that is to saye primer seisin aswell in the landes holden of others as of hym selfe bee it that the landes holden of other bee holden by knyghtes seruice or in Socage But otherwyse yt ys where the tenure is but a tenure by Socage in capite for there the kynge shall haue noe primer seisin in landes holden of other namelye if theye be holden of other by knyghtes seruice as it appearethe plainlye by the statute of Magna charta capit 27. and in the newe Natura breuium fo 2â—â— nor yet anye primier seisin of landes holden of hymselfe in Socage in capite â–ª If the heyre at
any suche accion against the kinge For Bracton which wrote in king H. 3. time or nere thereupon saith in his .iii. booke vnder the title Contra queÌ„ coÌ„petit assisa in this wise Inter cetera videndum est quis sit ille qui deiecit Princeps ex poteÌ„tia vel aliquis nomine suo vel iudex qui male iudicauerit an priuata persona si princeps vel rex vel alius qui superiorem non habuerit nisi deum contra ipsuÌ„ non habebitur remedium per assisam imo tantum erit locus supplicationi vt factum suum corriget et emendet quod si non fecerit sufficiat ei pro pena quod deum expectet vltorem qui dicit mihi vindictam et ego retribuam nisi sit qui dicat quod vniuersitas regni et Barronagium suum facere possit et debeat in Curia ipsius regis sed si alius ex facto et disseisina principis statim vel ex post facto in seisinam institerit quamuis talis incidat in assisam et in penam vel tantum ad restitutionem secundum quod seisina ad ipsuÌ„ peruenerit statim vel ex post facto sine principe tamen conueniri non poterit per assisam quia licet quodamodo disseisinam fecerit tamen non per se sed cum alio s. cum principe et ita quod sine eo respoÌ„dere non potuit et ita non procedit assisa Indirecte tamen et quasi ex incidenti et sine breui comprehendi poterit persona principis ad hoc quod factum suum emendet vel in ê‘sonam suam reduÌ„dabit iniuria manifeste vt ecce Esto quod impetretur assisa tantum super eum ad quem res translata est sine principe et qui tenetur ad restitutionem et ad penam vel ad minus ad restitutionem et ipse respondeat quôd sine principe qui fecit iniuriam per se vel per suos respondere non debeat quia ipse princeps per se fecit iniuriam vel ipsi duo insimul extunc erit factum et iniuria in manu domini regis qui dici debet in facto quasi warrantus et quod tunc poterit si warrantus voluerit factum suum emendare quasi a lege compulsus et quam in persona sua cum sit ei submissus debet firmiter obseruare So that by Bracton it appeareth that no accion lyeth against the kinge but the partye greeued is dryuen to sue to the king by peticion But the reason why that aduowsons shoulde passe in the kings case by the order of the common lawe thoughe it were not expressed in the graunt was this I suppose because that landes or tenementes were not then compted as thinges that touched the roiall estate or that made the kynges crowne lyke as Liberties or fraunchises did For the one a comon persone might haue as well as the kinge but the other none might haue but the king or suche as were able to shewe his grant therof and therefore saith Bracton in his first booke vnder the title que res dari possint that for landes currit tempus contra regem sicut contra quamlibet priuatam personam Which is as much to say that if the king had right to any such landes or tenementes and hadde surcessed his time so longe that it exceeded the time of limitation in a write of right his highnes hadde lost then his right for euer And herewith agreeth Briton fo 29. But that is saith Britton of landes parcell of the kinges eschetes or pourchased landes and not of the auncient demeasnes of his crowne for of those nullum currit ei tempus if hee haue anye righte to demaunde them So that by Britton this reason will not serue for landes parcel of the crowne Ideo quere veraÌ„ rationem Howbeit since this statute made what landes soeuer they be those thinges that are comprised in this statut passe not without making expresse mencion therof Hetherto we haue spoken of the reason why at the common lawe aduowsons shoulde passe by graunt of the manour without being named now let vs see how since the makinge of this statute it shal lykewise passe by graunt of the manour without being expressely named and how not And if the kinge render vp to him that was in warde at ful age his landes or to a bishopp his temporalties although he make no mencion of knights fees or auousons yet all passe therwith for like as the kinges seisine in suche case is by these woordes omnia terra et tenementa without speakinge of fees or auowsons euen so being sued out of his handes by these woordes omnia terre et tenementa Liuerie p. 7. T 16 E. 3. p. 30. fees and auâ—wsoÌ„z do passe without making any mencion thereof And this appeareth .5 E. 3. .16 of the same king Where after the death of an ydeot the king rendred againe the lands to the heire not making meÌ„tion of fees or auousons yet he had them And likewise 41. et 44. E. 3. the kinge graunted the temporalties to one that was elect bishop before he was coÌ„secrat H. 41. E. 3. f 44. E. 3. f. 22. aiudged that fees aduousons passed wtout making any meÌ„cion therof yet at the time of the graunt he was not bishop for he lacked consecracion And the reson in all these cases is for that the king was but seised in another bodies righte and by his liuerie he geueth nothinge vnto them but only restoreth theÌ„ to their right they had before Like law should it appere to be by Finchden .29 E. 3. H. 29. E. 3. in Fitz. ti Quare impedit p. 190. If auousoÌ„ of a church be appeÌ„daÌ„t to a Priorie which Priorie is seised into the kings haÌ„ds by resoÌ„ that an alieÌ„ is patron of it afterward the king dimiseth the saide Priorie cum pertinenÌ„ not makinge mention of thauouson vnto the saide Prior yelding a rent to haue to hold the same during the warre And his reason is this for that the right freehold in this case remaineth still in the Priour notwithstandinge any such seisin the kinge is but to haue an annuel profit therof no right but if anye bee to sue dower or liuerie with a particion out of the kinges haÌ„des they by that cannot haue thauouson if mencion be not ther of made no more than they can that claim by Graunt and yet the king rendreth them the thing in respect of a right be fore as he doth in the other cases But what then they claim not the whole lande that is in the kinges hands but only parcell therof then thauouson euermore abydeth with that that remaines if expresse mencion be not made therof and so not like the cases before where the king makes liuerie of the whole And this case appeareth also in the said booke of 5. E. 3. And note
driuen to sue liuerie Further then let vs see in what cases the kinge shall haue annum diem et vastum and in what not The kinge shall not haue annum diem et vastum of clerks coÌ„uict after verdit because hee forfetes no land Like lawe is it of lands in Gauelkinde where the father is hanged but otherwise it is if he be outlawed or abiured for felonie for there the kinge shal haue the yeare daie wast and this appereth 3. 3. E. 3. in Fitz ti corone P. 332. et Prescription P. 50. E. 3. et 8. E. 2. If the husband be atteinted of felonie the kinge shall haue the yeare daye and wast of the laÌ„ds of the wife and yet in the case the lordes shall not haue theyr eschetes But what then the husbaÌ„d might haue done wast and the wife had had no remedie for the same and by the same reason the kinge maye doe as much and this appeareth 3. 3. E. 3. in Fitz ti corone P. 327. E. 3. And also in Bracton in his second boke And also it shoulde there appeare that the wiefe is driuen to sue anouster le main after the death of her husbande If one be arested for felonie brekes the arest so that in the pursuyt of him he is killed because hee woulde not otherwise be taken 3. E. 3. in Fitz ti Corone P. 312. et 290 et 308. the king in this case shal haue the yere day and wast as it appereth 3. E. 3. If a man coÌ„mit felonie and hathe his charter of pardon yet the king shal haue the yeare day wast and the lordes theyr eschetes this appereth 3. E. 3. for the pardoÌ„ doth not restore him but to the lawe For though the kinge would pardon him with words of restitucion yet his grace could not therby restore him to the laÌ„ds holdeÌ„ of other And note that the king shal haue the yere 3. E. 3. in Fitz ti Corone P. 310. day wast of laÌ„ds in ancieÌ„t demesne if it so be that the tenaÌ„t myght haue sold the said lands against the will of the lord as it appereth 3. E. 3. and that notwtstanding that the sayd lands were alwayes vsed to be surrendred by the rodde to passe by surreÌ„der The words of the statute be further Exceptis hominibus quoruÌ„daÌ„ priuilegiatoruÌ„ indâ— ê‘regeÌ„ 46. E. 3. f. 14. 1. H. 6 fo 12. M. 8. H. 4. f. 1 Corone 31. That is as much to say except such as haue Bona et cattalla felonuÌ„ by the kynges graunte for a man can not prescribe to haue Bona et catalla felonuÌ„ as appereth 46. E. 3. 1. H. 7. 8. H. 4. nor none may haue this prerogatiue of yere day wast but only the kinge although hee would claime it by charter froÌ„ the kinge or otherwise as it appereth 3. E. 3. But when the king is seised of it he may coÌ„mit it ouer as appereth by Bracton in his sayd 2. boke But if the land wherof the kinge should haue the yere day and wast be vnder the yerely value of iii s .iiii. d it is vsed to bee remitted for the smallnesse and simplenesse of the thinge as appereth 3. E. 3. 3. E. 3. in Fitz ti Corone P. 327. for it shoulde cost more the suing of it out of the kinges handes than the thing is worth And note the custoÌ„e of Gloc ' comprised in this statut wherby it should appere that notwithstanding any such custome yet the king should haue annuÌ„ et dieÌ„ but not so of laÌ„ds in Gauelkinde as I haue sayd before ¶ Proces to bee sued after the deathe of the kinges tenaunt in chiefe By a statute made in the 33. yere of the late kinge of most famous memorie H. 8. the 22. chapter it is ordeined and prouided amoÌ„ge other things that no person or persons hauing lands or tenemeÌ„ts aboue the yerely value of fiue poundes shal haue or sue any liuerie before inquisitioÌ„ or office fouÌ„d before theschetour or other commissioner or commissioners by vertue of the kinges writ or commission too bee directed out of the kinges chauÌ„cerie or other courtes hauing authoritie to mak suche writes or commissions for suinge of liueries which writs or commissions shal not passe out of the chancerie nor any other courts but by a warrant or bill too bee assigned and subscribed with the handes and names of the master of the kinges wardes and liueries surueiour of his liueries or the attourne and resceiuor of the court of the wardes and liueries or three twoo or one of them to bee directed deliuered to the chanceller of England or to any other chanceler or officer hauiÌ„g power to awarde such writes And if the lands or tenements wherof any inquisition is to be had by vertue of any such writ or commission excede the yerely value of fiue poundes that then such as sue for such writes and commissions shal pay for the seale and writing therof such fees as hath ben accustomed And if the sayd laÌ„ds tenemeÌ„ts wherof any such inquisicions and offices ar to be found by vertue of any such writ or commission excede not the sayde yerely value of v pounde theÌ„ such as shal sue for such writs or commissions shall paye for the seale of euery of them vi d and for the writinge vi d and not aboue This statut doth not set fourth the name of the writ or coÌ„missioÌ„ that shal bee sued howbeit these words that follow that is to sayr for suinge of liueries do somwhat open the minde of the makers of this statute and declare that their meaninge was of the diem clausit and such other writs or coÌ„missions as serue for that purpose and not of euery writ or coÌ„missioÌ„ for so might an office be found by a wroÌ„g writ or coÌ„missioÌ„ which should want mater or be other wise insufficient to make liueries But learne and enquire if after a good writ or coÌ„missioÌ„ sued fourth the office that is found is not sufficient whether the partie shal haue his liueri or not without suing a melius inquirenduÌ„ or a new office because that some parauenture wil say that the words of the statut be performed that is to wite an office or inquisition is found But to that it may be answered and sayd that that it is no office when it is insufficient at least wise toward the partie that should sue liuerie therupon although it be a good office toward the kinge if any thing therin conteined be for his benefit And learne also if the kinges tenant dye seised of landes in diuerse counties whether by force of this statut he shal cause an iÌ„quisitioÌ„ or office to be fouÌ„d in eueri couÌ„tie where the lands lye for so is it vsed to be done vpoÌ„ al general liueries he that sueth his general liuerie otherwise missueth the same and is an intruder vpon the kiÌ„gs possessioÌ„ howbeit peraueÌ„ture you wil say that
and entitle hym by the seconde office and trauerse the firste as hee nedes muste for thenterpleder muste nedes reste vppon the firste office and not vpon the second then as thissue is founde P. 36. E. 3. in Fits titulo Trauers P. 44. so shall hee or theye for whome it is founde haue lyuerye And this appearethe in the newe Natura breuium fo 294. 36. E. 3. 16. E. 4. folio 4. Howebeit a great doubt ryseth in our bookes vppon thys mater whether thenterpleder shal be fourthwithe after the seconde office founde or not vntill suche time as the heyre that is founde wythin age commethe to his age and as it appeareth by the sayde boke of 36. Ed. 3. in this case where one was first found of full age after the other within age thenterpleader was fourthwithe for it weare noe reason that hee that was ryghte heire and of full age shoulde bee delayed by the nonage of the other that is noe heire And a straunger shal bee receaued to trauerse the office not withstandinge the heire that is founde by the office that is trauersed bee withein age And then it is noe reason that the heire in this case be in worse condicion then a strauÌ„ger But take it by the first office one is found heire and wythin age and by the seconde office an other is found heire and of full age whether in this case they shal enterplede or not or whether thenterpleader shal be before thage of the other And surely it shoulde seeme by the groundes and rules declared before vpon the writ of Diem clausit extremum that the seconde office in this last case is voide because there ys noe better title founde for the king than was by the first then if it be voide there can be no enterpleder Howebeâ—yt in the newe Natura breuium fo 2â—0 it appeareth to the contrary hereof that they shal enterplede in this case and that the seconde office is not voyde for there the heyres founde by bothe offices weare of full age And yet that notwythstandynge theye enterpleaded And so is .5 T. 5. E. 4. f. â— Edwarde the fowerthe where it is sayde that if by one office the heire is founde within age and by an other office an other is founde heire and of ful age that in this case theye shall enterpleade but not before the childe come to his full age And Townesende iustice sayeth in .1 H. 7. that if by diuerse offices ij Liuery P. 17 be seuerally founde heires and within age nowe the kynge shall kepe the landes tyll theire full age and thenne theye shall enterpleade and yf theye dye before enterpleder their heires within age seueral Deuenerunt shal be awarded that is to say for euerie heire one by the same beyng fouÌ„d seuerally heyres to the auncester theye shall enterpleade at they re full age like as the auncester shoulde haue doone if they hadde lyued and yf the dyinge of anye of them weare wytheout issue and the other founde to bee his heire then is thenterpleder determined Thus may ye see how bokes vary in this matter and yet by the waye note this difference that is to saye where by the firste office the heire is founde within age and were of full age for by these bokes it shoulde seeme that if hee bee firste founde withein age notwithstandyng that by an other office an other is found heire and of full age yet hee shall not enterplede with the other tyll he bee of age contrarie it is yf the fyrst be found of full age and the nexte wythin age and the reason may be for that the kynge is first seysed of hym that is wythyn age with whom the lawe weyes more in presumption to bee heire than the other and thys tytle ys the beste tytle that the kynge hathe for it entytlethe hys highenesse to a greater benefite than dothe the seconde office and thys second was found vpon a coÌ„mission graunted more for the kings benefit thaÌ„ for the heries that should be fouÌ„d by the same and therefore it weare reason that hee that is first founde heire haue more fauoure if anye fauoure bee to bee shewed thanne hee that was last founde heire or at the least for the kynges benefit that the matter be respited til the childe bee of age Also the sayde Iustice Townesend sayde further that if one bee founde heire in one countie an other found heire in an other countie yet they shall enterplede whyche can not bee as me seemethe for once wee haue a generall grounde that a man can not sue a generall lyuerie by parcelles but firste he muste cause an office to be founde in euerye shere where he haue landes and when all the offices be returned then to haue his lyuerie and not beefore then this case where one is founde heire in one sheere and an other in an other sheere heare none of them bothe canne haue lyuerye beecause hee hathe noe office founde butte in one sheere and not in the other and thenne if there canne be noe liuerie there can be noe enterpleder wherfore it should seme in that case they caÌ„ not eÌ„terplede 2. â— 7. f. 2. Trauers 49. And here with agreeth the boke in .2 .8 Henry the seuenth So no enterpleder can bee but where there is an office thorough the whole found for euerye heire in euerye countie wheare the landes lye but it is not allwaye requisite that theare bee seuerall offices founde for sometimes vppon one office founde by it self alone there maye bee an enterpleder and that is wheare ij bee founde heires by one enqueste as two twynnes that is to say two children borne at a burden And it is to be noted that euerye enterpleder is to trye the priuitie of bloude onely that is to say which of these the enterplede is next heyre to hym that last dyed seysed and not to trye theire rightes in the landes And therfore if by one office one bee fouÌ„d heire of a general taile and by an other office an other is founde heire to the same lande as of estate in specyall taile theye shall not enterpleade as it appearethe in 21. H. 7. fo 3â— Allso they must be both found heires to him that last dyed and by whose death the king dyd seise for if one bee founde heire to hym that dyed seised and another is founde heire to the auÌ„cester that dyed seised nexte before the last dyinge seised in this case they shall not enterplede as it appearethe in H. 2. H. 6. f. 5. Also theye shall not enterplede but wher both heirs claime by one selfe title of landes holden of the kinge for yf the kings tenant dye seised of lands holden of other as well as of the kynge and one is founde heire to al the landes and by an other office an other is founde heire onely to the landes holden of other in this case theye shall not enterpleade as it appeareth in .12 E. 4.
in cancellarie noÌ„ obstante quadam ordinatione nuper per dominum regem facta de terris tenÌ„ in manum suam per ministros suos capt ' non liberand ' nisi per ipsum dominum regem prout continetur in quadam diuidenda inter ipsum regem cancellarium facta Cuius vna pars penes cancellarium remanet Statutum de escaetoribus editum .29 E .2 Also a yeare before the makinge of this statut was there an other statut made entitled articuli super cartas which in the 19. chapiter therof saith in this wise De rescheiue la ou lesche tour ou le vicont seisont en le main le roy terres la ou il nad reson de seiser et puis quant troue est la non reson les issues de mesne teÌ„ps ount este ceo en arrere retenê° et nad rendus quant le roy ad le main ouste voet le roy que desormes la ou terres sont issint seisies et puis le main ouste pur ceo que il ny ad raison de seiser ne tenir soient les issues pleinment reÌ„dus a celuy a qui la terre demurt et auoit le damÌ„ resceu By this statute it plainly appereth how that before the making therof therewas no ouster le main graunted vna cum exitibus although it might neuer so plainly appere that the kinge had no cause to seise Howbeit that mischief is now remedied by both these statutes Also by the one of these statutes Also by th one of these statutes it appeareth that the Ouster le maine in suche case might not be graunted without suinge to the kinge himselfe which is also remedied by this statut de escaetoribus which statute although it make no mencion of liueries but onely of ouster le maine yet lyueries are taken to bee within the compasse and prouision of the same And where the letter goeth onelye to the cases where the kinge seiseth before office 9. E. 4. 54. and after warde thoffice that is founde doth giue his highnes no title that there the party may haue his Ouster le maine makinge no mencion of an Ouster le maine to be graunted vppon anye peticion trauerse or Monstraunce de droit as in deede a trauerse was not in vre at that time yet men by an equitie extende this statute de Escaetoribus bothe to the one and too the other because the statute is beneficiall as it appeareth 9. E. 4. and in diuers other bookes And Yeluerton there saieth that if after liuerie or ouster le maine an office bee founde whiche entitleth the kinge of a title growen vntoo him since the liuerie or ouster la maine granted that in that case this statute notwithstanding the kinge may reseise wtout a Scire facias for the woordes are onelye where a record or an office is founde that maintaineth the title whereby the kinge first seised Howbeit manye holde oppinion againste him and saie that it was in the selfe same mischiefe the statute was made for tamen quere for this statut de escaetoribus shoulde seeme to be meant onely to remedy that the was a mischief at comoÌ„ law before the making of the said statut as where there was no record found at the time of the liuerie or ouster le maine sued to let or hinder the partie from suynge of theire saide liuerie or ouster le maine but afterwardes was there found such a record now this notwithstandinge would the king reseise putt the partie from his possession wtout answer or any proces sued against him wherupon he might answer so driue him to sue by peticion make him render all the mene profite which was a greate mischiefe hinderance to the partie for remedie whereof this statut was made but the like mischiefe or hinderance is not where the kinge is entitled by a title groweÌ„ since the liuerie or ouster le maine for here the partie shall not aunswere the profites but froÌ„ the time of this title growen And also the kyng doth him no wronge for it standes with and affirmes the liuery or ouster le maine the king thereby makes not that party an intrudor as he doth in the other case if the said Yeluertons opinion should not be lawe they woulde make that the kinge could not seise vpon an alienacion wtout licence made and found by office since the liuerie or ouster le maine sued which were no reson therefore I think the saide Yeluertons opinion should preuaile in this case And to the same intente effect be those bookes that I can fynd for I can finde no Scire facias sued but in cases of a title growen before the liueries or ouster le maine therefore in a Scire facias sued vpoÌ„ this statute against the party that had liuerie or ouster le maine beeing tenant of the land at the time of Scire facias sued he was denâ—ed in the selfe same plight course against the king as he was at time of the suing of his liuerie or ouster le main for where he had made a feffement by licence taken an estate againe iointly to him other yet this scire facias dyd lye against him soly did not abate for the iointenauntes So was it aiudged in a scire facias sued vpon this statute the the partie must maintaine the title whereby he hath liuery or ouster le maine must maintaine it so that it is was a good title sufficient to haue liuerie vpoÌ„ notwithstanding any recorde that is now found as take the case to bee this one hath liuerie as sole daughter heire after by office it is founde that she hath a sister which ought to haue had liueri with her wherupon a scire facias is sued against the partye that had liuerie to come shew why the land should not bee reseised if she come will saye that they be daughters by seueral ventres that this lande was geeuen to her father mother in speciall taile so ought shee to haue the liuere as she had the is to say soly this plea wil not serue her because it doth not mainteine the liuerie for how could she haue had liuerie soly vnlesse this matter had bene so found by office For if this second office had appeared before the liuerie she coulde not haue trauersed it vnlesse she had made title and then title can shee neuer make againste the kynge as heyre vnlesse the saide title bee firste founde by office Wherfore no more than she might trauerse the said office if it had bene found before liuerie Trauers 31. no more may she trauerse it now in this scire facias after liuerie as it appereth 30. li. Ass and so note that the recorde can not bee trauersed in this scire facias in no case vnlesse it were trauersable before liuery or ouster le maine Also in