Selected quad for the lemma: land_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
land_n	father_n	heir_n	purchase_v	1,342	5	10.3637	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A86253	The law of conveyances, shewing the natures, kinds, and effects, of all manner of assurances, with the manner of their several executions and operations. Also directions to sue out and prosecute all manner of writs, of extent, elegit, and judiciall writs upon statutes, recognizances, judgments, &c. A warrant to summon a court of survey: and the articles to be given in charge, and inquired of in that court. With an exposition of divers obscure words and termes of law, used in ancient records, &c. And also plaine decimall tables, whereby may be found the true values of lands, leases, and estates, in possession, or reversion. With a concordance of years, &c. / By John Herne Gent.	Herne, John, fl. 1660.	1655 (1655)	Wing H1570; Thomason E1597_2	165,473	258

owne Child Attainders which give Escheat Attainder by Verdict Confession Outlawry Abjuration but upon either of them judgment must be given Forfeiture of Goods and Chattels Going beyond the Sea without license Exigent awarded in Felony though he yeild his body thereupon Clergy in Felony standing mute in Felony Felo de se Flying for Felony though he returne and be tryed and found not guilty These bring a forfeiture of all a mans Goods and Chattels as well reall as personall Attainder to what time it shal relate for the forfeiture of Lands and Goods Forfeiture He that is attainted of Felony by Verdict Confession or Outlawry doth forfeit all the Lands he had at the time of the offence committed so that he can do no Act afterward to encumber the Land If Tenant in taile be attainted of high Treason he shall forfeit for no longer time then for his owne life If a man have an Estate for life of himselfe or of another do commit Treason or Felony the whole Estate is forfeited to the King but no escheat to the Lord. But a Copyhold of Fees as for life is forfeited to the Lord and not to the Crowne and if it be entailed Forfeiture by a Copy-holder the Lord is to have it during the life of the Offender and then his Heire is to have it A man attainted may purchase Pardon Corruption of blood but it shall be to the Kings use untill the party be pardoned yet the pardon giveth not back their Lands or Goods without a speciall Patent of Restitution which cannot restore the blood without an Act of Parliament So if a man hath a Son and then is attainted of Felony and pardoned and then purchaseth Land and then hath issue another Son and dieth the Son he had before the pardon though he be his eldest Son and the Patent have words of restitution to his Lands yet he shall not inherit them but the second Son shall inherit them because the blood is corrupted by the Attainder and cannot be restored by Patent alone but by Act of Parliament And if a man hath two Sonnes Where a man shall be said to dye without Heire although he have one and the eldest is attainted in the life of his Father and dieth without issue living the Father the second Son shall inherite the Fathers Lands but if the eldest Son have any Issue though he dye in the life of his Father then neither the second Son nor the Issue of the eldest shall inherit the Fathers Land but the Father shall be there accounted to dye without Heire and the Land shall escheat whether the eldest Son hath issue or not though he be pardoned after the death of his Father Note that the Heires procreate after the Attainder shall not inherite the Lands of his Father nor of his Mother But the Heires begotten before the Attainder shall inherit the Lands of that Father and of that Mother which was not attainted but the Lands of his Father attainted or of his Mother which is attainted he shall not inherit although the King hath pardoned the Attainder The operation and effect of a pardon For a pardon doth but onely cleare the corruption of the bloud of these children which be borne after the pardon and so to make them capeable to inherit such lands which their Ancestor shall purchase at the time of the pardon or any time after but not to inherit such lands as the Ancestor was seised of before nor to purge the bloud of those children begotten before the pardon as to make them inheritable to any Ancestor Alien and Denizen A man seised of lands in Fee hath issue an Alien borne out of the Kings Leigeance he cannot be heire Propter defectum subjectionis though he be born within lawfull marriage if made Denizen by the Kings Letters patents yet cannot he inherit to his father or any other but otherwise it is if he be naturalized by act of Parliament for then he is not accounted in law Alienigena but Indigena but after one is made Denizen the issue that hee hath afterwards shall be heire to him but no issue that he had before If an Alien come into England and hath issue two sons these two sons Indigenae subjects borne because borne within the Realme and yet if one of them purchase land in Fee and dieth without issue his brother shall not be his heire for there was never any inheritable bloud between the Father and them and where the sons by no possibility can be heire to the Father the one of them shall not be heire to the other An Alien that is naturalized by Act of Parliament is to all intents and purposes as a naturall born subject differs much from denization by Letters patents for if he had issue in England before his denization that issue is not inheritable to his father but if his father be naturalized by Parliament such issue shall inherit so if an issue of an English man be born beyond Sea if the issue be naturalized by act of Parliament he shall inherit his fathers land but if he be made denizen by Letters Patents he shall not and many other differences there are between them An Alien borne out of the Kings leigeance his ancestors not being of the faith and leigeance of England is neither heire to inherit nor to purchase within this realme yet the Lord shall not have the escheate because he died without heire but the King which is the supreame head and the supreame person shall have this Land by the common Law But an Alien borne out of the Realme and within the Legiance of the King his Father and Mother being then and all their live of the legiance of the King shall inherit by the common Law Infants borne out of the Kings legiance the father and mother at the time of the birth being leigemen of England shall inherit by the Statute of 25 E. 3. so that the mothers of the children pass the Sea with the husbands leave and consent this statute extendeth all to children whose fathers and mothers were dwelling in England If an Alien marry here an english woman and hath issue this issue shall inherit to the wife the same law where the husband an English-man marry a woman that is an Alien and hath issue he shall inherit his father All which said trusts every one of them the said A. B. C. D. for himselfe severally and respectively Covenant severall no joynt covenant and for his severall and respective heire Executors and Administrators for as much as shall concerne him or them and his or their said heires Executors or Administrators c. doth covenant c. And the said A. B. C. D. do severally and respectively that is to say either of them for himselfe and by himselfe his severall heires Executor When Covenants are severall they are as severall Deeds written in one Parchment Coke 5. part fo 23.

been usually lopt Tythes shall not be paid for them for as the Law priviledgeth the body of the Tree being parcell of the inheritance so doth it priviledge the Branches also so if a man cut his timber trees Tythes shall not be paid for the boughs or sprouts which are going out of the roots or stowles in respect that the root is parcell of the inheritance so if a timber tree become arda sicca non portans folia nec fructus in aestate nec existens macorin and the owner cut him no Tythes shall be paid therof in respect of the inheritance which was once in him so for the barke of Oakes being timber no tythes shall be paid but for Acornes tythe shall be paid because that groweth yearely Inheritance doth passe without livery and seisin by a grant If I grant all my Trees within the Mannor of G. to one and his heires the Grantee shall have inheritance in them without any Livery and Seisin Coke Barringtons case S. pars fo 137. And so if I grant to you my Trees in my Wood you may come with Waines or Carts over my Land to carry them Coke 11. pars fo 53. Vsery Clayton requested Reynolds to lend him 30. l. and upon communication between them Reynolds lent Claton 30. pound the sixth day of December 34 Eliz. unto the second of June next following to pay unto him for the principall and Lone thereof 33 l. upon the said second of June if the sonne of Reynolds were then alive and if he died before the day that then he should pay unto him twenty seven pounds which was 3 l. under the principals this is by the resolution of the whole Court was usery within the letter of the Statute Coke 5. pars fo 70. It was agreed between T. W. and A. G that A. Boortons case Coke 5. pars fo 69. should lend to T. W. 100 l. and that the said T. W. should grant to the said A. and his heires a rent which was in esse of 20 l. upon a condition that the said A. should lend to the said T. W. 100 l. as aforesaid And that the said T. should grant to the said A. and his heires the rent of 20 l. upon this condition that if the said T. should pay to the said A. 100 l s. the 17. of July 1580. which was a full yeare before the contract made that then the rent should cease and hereupon the money was received and the rent granted accordingly This was not within the statute of usury because nothing was to be paid by T. W. the Grantor within a yeare and a quarter after the Grant made for within the 17. day of Iuly 1579. and Christmas 1580. at which time a distres was taken for the rent no rent was limitted to be paid and if the Grantor had paid the 100 l. the 17. of July 1580. the rent had ceased without paying any thing for the same 100 l. So the whole Court adjudged that it was a plaine bargaine and conditionall purchase of such a rent and no usery But it was resolved by the Court that if it had been agreed between the Grantor and the Grantee that notwithstanding such power of redemption that the 100 pounds should not have been paid at the day and that the clause of redemption was inserted to make an evasion out of the Statute then it had been an usurious bargaine and contract within the Statute Coke 3. pars fo 69. Where a man for 100 l. selleth his land upon condition that if the Vendor or his heire repay the sum citra festum Pasch or such like then next comming that then he may re-enter that is not usury for he may repay it the morrow after or at any time before Pasc●… And therefore he hath not any gaine certaine to receive any profit of the land And likewise where any Defeasance or Statute is made for the repayment citra tale festum But it is otherwise if the condition be that if the said Vendor repay such a day such a yeare or two yeares after this is usury for he is sure to have the Land and the rents land or profits that yeare or these two yeares And so when a Defeasance or Statute is made for the repayment at such a feast which is a yeare or two years after B. Usury 1. If a man morgage his Land upon Defeasance of repayment to re-enter by which Indenture the Vendee leaseth the same land to the Vendor for yeares rendant rent there if there bee a condition in the Lease that if the Vendor repay the same before such a day that then the lease shall be void that is not usury But otherwise it is if he be to pay it such a day certaine or such a yeare or more after B. usury 2. 32 H. 8. Inheritances lineall and collaterall Lands purchased may goe to the heires both of the part of the father and mother of the Purchasor unlesse it be once attached in the heire of the part of the Father for the heir of the part of the Mother shall never have it because they are not of blood to him that was last seised But Lands discended goeth onely to the heire of that part from whence it discends as if from the Father who did purchase it then it may goe to the heirs of the part of the mother of the same father but not to the heirs of the part of the sons mother for though they be of blood to the sonne that was last seised yet they are not of blood to the father which was the first purchasor And if a man Purchase Lands in Fee-simple and die without issue he which is next Cousin collaterall of the whole bloud how far soever he be from him in degree may inherit and have the Land as heire to him These words do intend that where a man doth purchase lands and dieth without issue and having neither brother nor sister then his next Cosin collaterall shall inherit So as there is implied a division of Heires viz lineall who shall ever first inherit and collaterall who are to inherit in default of lineal for in discent it is a Maxime in Law Quod linea recta semper praefertur transversali Lineall discent is conveyed downward in a right line as from the Grandfather to the Father from the Father to the Son and so downward collaterall discent is derived from the side of the lineall as Granfathers Brother Fathers Brother c. Vpon this word Next I put this case One hath issue two Sons A. and B. and dieth B. hath two Sons C. and D. and dieth C. the eldest Son hath issue and dieth A. purchaseth lands in Fee-simple and dieth without issue D. is his next Cosin and yet shall not inherit but the issue of C. for he that is inheritable is accounted in Law next of blood And therefore here is understood a division of next viz. next jure representationis and

next jure propinquitatis that is by right of representation and by right of propinquity And Littleton meaneth of the right of representation for legally in course of discent he is next of blood inheritable And the issue of C. doth represent the person of C. and if C. had lived he had been legally next of blood And whensoever the Father if he had lived should have inherited his lineall heire by right of representation shall inherit before any other though a Mother be jure propinquitati●… neerer of blood But if there be Father and Son and the Father hath a brother that is Uncle to the Son and the Son purchase lands in fee and die without issue living the Father the Uncle shall have the lands as heire to the Son and not the Father yet the Father is neerer of blood because it is a Maxime in Law that inheritance may lineally descend but not ascend yet if the Son in this case die without issue and the Uncle enter into the land as heire to the Son and after the Uncle dieth without issue living the Father the Father shall have the land as heire to the Uncle and not as heire to his Son for that he cometh to the land by collaterall discent and not by lineall ascent and his Uncle enter into the land for if the Uncle in this case doth not enter into the land then cannot the Father inherit the land for there is another Maxime in Law herein implied That a man that claimeth as heir in Fee-simple to any man by discent must make himself heire to him that was last seised of the actual Freehold and inheritance And if the Uncle in this case doth not enter then had he but a Freehold in Law and no actuall Freehold but the last that was seised of the actuall Freehold was the Son to whom the Father cannot make himself heire And therefore Littleton saith And his Uncle enter into the land as he ought by the Law to make the Father to inherit as heire to the Uncle Note that true it is that the Uncle in this case is heire but not absolutely heire for if after the discent to him the Father hath issue a Son or a Daughter that issue shall enter upon the Uncle And so it is if a man hath issue a Son and a Daughter the Son purchaseth land in fee and dieth without issue the Daughter shall inherit the land but if the Father hath afterward issue a Son this Son shall enter into the land as heire to his brother and if he hath issue a Daughter and no Son she shall be Co-partner with her Sister As he ought by the Law These words as a Key do open the secrets of the Law for hereupon it is concluded that where the Uncle cannot get an actuall possession by entry or otherwise there the Father in this case cannot inherit And therefore if an Advowson be granted to the Son and his Heires and the Son die and this discend to the Uncle and he die before he doth or can present to the Church the Father shall not inherit because he should make himself heire to the Son which he cannot do And so of a rent and the like But if the Uncle had presented to the Church or had Seisin of the rent there the Father should have inherited For Littleton putteth his case of an entry into land But for an example if the Son make a Lease for life and die without issue and the Reversion discend to the Uncle and he die the Reversion shall not discend to the Father because in that case he must make himself heire to the Son If the Father make a Lease for years and the Lessee entreth and the Father dieth the eldest Son dieth before entry or receipt of the rent the younger Son of the half blood shall not inherit but the Sister because the possession of the Lessee for years is the possession of the eldest Son so as he is actually seised of the Frank-tenement and the Inheritance and consequently the Sister of the whole blood is to be heire And so if lands be holden by Knights service and the eldest Son is within age and the Guardian entreth into the lands An so likewise if Guardian in Socage enters But in the case aforesaid if the Father make a lease for life or a gift in tail and dieth and the eldest Son dieth in the life of Tenant for life c. the younger brother of the half blood shall inherit because the Tenant for life or Tenant in tail is seised of the Freehold and the eldest Son had nothing but a Reversion expectant upon the Freehold and therefore the youngest Son shall inherit the land as Heire to his Father who was last seised of the actuall Freehold And albeit a rent had been reserved on the estate for life and the eldest Son had received the rent and died yet it is holden by that the younger brother shall inherit because the seisin of the rent is no actuall seisin of the Freehold of the land but Liber Ass part 2. seemeth to the contrary Ideo quaere He that claimeth Lands Tenements Maxime upon collaterall discent or Hereditaments as collaterall heire to any one must claim from such an one that had an actuall possessession and died actually seised of the Frank-tenement and the inheritance in Fee-simple of those lands which he so claimeth by discent and not from such a one who had but a possession in Law or a reversion in Fees expectant on a Frank-tenement discendible unto him But to the lineall heire it sufficeth that the Ancestor should have been heire if he had lived But if such a collaterall heire claime from a collaterall Ancestor that had a possession in Law by his own purchase or reversion in Fee-simple expectant on a Frank-tenement by his own purchase it is sufficient Actuall possession Note that an actuall possession must be gained either by a mans own act or by the actuall possession of another but if neither by his own act nor by the possession of another he doth gain no more then discendeth unto him then the brother of the half blood shall inherit Possessio quid And this word Possessio is no other but pedis positio and extendeth onely to things whereof a man by his entry or other act may gain an actuall possession for when the eldest Son hath not an actuall possession or if it be such inheritance whereof any possession may not be gained per pedis positionem or by any other act then the inheritance by the Law shall discend to the brother of the half blood As for example The King by his Letters Patents createth a Baron and giveth the Dignity to him and his Heires and he hath issue a Son and a Daughter by one venter and a Son by another venture and dieth the eldest Son dieth without issue To whom shall the dignity discend To the younger Son for it may not be said that the

cap. 18. and 33. H. 8. cap. 39. Debitor of the King possessed of a Lease selleth it bona fide This bindeth the King for it is but a Chattel Co. 8. 172. Note that the King shall levie the summe for which any is chargeable unto him not only against the party himselfe scil of his body his lands and goods in his own hands but in the hands of his Heires Assignes Executors or Administrators and if he hath no Executors or Administrators then in the hands of the possessors of the goods of the dead What Lands and goods shall be extended or taken by the Sheriff in Execution upon Statute c. in case of a common person NOte that upon Statute Merchant or Staple all the Fee-simple Lands which the said Connusor had at the time of the said Statute acknowledged or at any time after shall be liable to the said Statute into whose hands they shal ever come afterwards by alienation Feoffement or otherwise Stat. de mercator 13 E. 1. 27 E. 3. cap. 9. 23 H. 8. Co. 3. 12. But if the Debitor die the body of his heire shall not be taken but his Fee simple lands which descendeth to him from the Connusor shall be taken in form aforesaid if he be of full age or when he commeth to full age untill the debt be levied Statut. de mercator And so was the common Law before that in debt against the heir the Plaintiff shall have all the Land which discendeth to the heir in execution and yet he shall not have then execution of any part of the land against the father himselfe Note that it hath been holden that the heir shall not be charged where the Executors have assets Fitz. Executors 25. Br. Debt 237. 17 E. 4. 13. Plow 439. 440. But at this day the law seemeth otherwise scil that it is at the election of the Creditor to sue the heir or Executors when both have assets 4 E. 4. 25. 22 H. 6. 4. 10 H. 7. 8. Doct. Stud. 153. Dier 204. Plowden 439. 440. Also it seemeth that if the heire doth not confesse the action and shew the certainty of the assets which he hath by discent but plead nothing by discent or is condemned by default that there the Plaintiff shall have execution of his other lands or of his goods or of his body by cap. ad satisfac Plow 440. Note that Fee-simple lands of the heire which he hath by discent the day of the Writ purchased or after shall be liable but otherwise if he hath aliened before the Writ purchased unlesse it be by covin Co. 5. 60. Possession in law discendeth upon the heir shall charge him So where he enters upon a condition Br. assetts 8. Reversion upon an estate for life discends upon the heire that shall charge him Br. Assets 12. 19. A reversion shall be put in execution and the judgment shall be cum acciderit and in the meane time of the rent Di. 373. Fitz. Assetts 237. Note in debt a man shall have execution of no land but of that which the Defendant hath the day of the judgement given 2. H. 4. Fitz. Executors 24. If a man sue a Statute Merchant of parcell of the Lands in name of all the Lands he shall not have other execution afterwards Fitz. Execution 13. 4. If I have but one Acre by discent I shall be charged with 1000 l. by obligation made by my father by Belk 40 E. 15. Fitz. Execution 32 vide quaere For it seemeth that the heire may confesse what he hath by dscent and demand judgement whether of more then of the value therof he ought to be charged Lands intailed are liable but during the life of the Connusor as if tenant in taile be bound in a Satute or Recognizance the land taile shall be bound during his life but it is not bound against the issue in taile Br. Recog 7. yet if the issue in taile enfeoffe a stranger now execution shall be against the Feoffee 19 E. 3. Fitz receipt 112. But if Tenant in taile acknowledge a Statute or Recognizance and after alien the lands in the hands of the Feoffee or alienee shall be subvert to this Statute or Recognizance Co. 1. 62. and 2. 52. 8 H. 7. 89. Copy hold Lands are not liable nor shall bee extended upon a Statute or Recognizance Lease or Terme for life shall be extended Lease for tearme of yeares and all other goods and Chattels of the Connusor or Debitor are liable and shall be extended ss such which the Connusor c. hath in his owne possession and to his own use at the time of the execution sued or awarded But sale of Chattels bona-fide after judgement and before execution awarded is good but not after execution awarded as appeareth in 2 H. 4. fo 14. per curiam Yet by Babington 7 H. 6. Br. execution 116. if a man be condemned in debt or bound in a Statute the goods which he hath the day of the judgment or knowledge of the Recognisance shall be bound to the execution in whose hands soever they shall come quod non fuit negatum Co. 7. 39. a every execution in judgement of law hath relation and retrospect to the judgment But a fraudulent conveyance or gift of Lands or goods shall not advoid any execution vide le statutes 50 E. 3. ca. 6. 1 R. 2. ca. 9. 2 R. 2. Stat. 2. ca. 3. 3 H. 7. ca. 4. 13 Eliz. ca. 5. 7 les liures 43 E. 3. fol. 3. Dier 295. Co. 3. 81. 82. 83. Lands in ancient demesne are liable to the Statute vide Fitz. Execution 118. and retorne 109. contra Lands or goods holden joyntly by the Connusor with a stranger and the connusor is condemned in damages and dieth before execution those lands or goods comming to the stranger by survivor are not extendable Br. execution 126. 148. 13 H. 7. 22. a. Lands of a wife are extendable during the coverture by debt of the husband 15 H. 7. fo 14. Rent may be delivered in execution Fitz. avowry 237 Exec. 63. Rent extent by release of the party may be extended Co. 7. ●8 39. As if a man hath judgement to recover debt or damages by that the rent which he hath of any estate of Frank-tenement is liable to it and therefore although that after judgment that be released yet that may be extended But a man shall never have a thing extended upon an execution except that he may grant and assigne the same thing by Shelly 28 H. 8. fo 7. So the profits of an Office or other thing which may not be granted or assigned over shall not be extended Dier fo 7. Goods demised pawned or pledged may not be taken in execution for his debt that demised or pawned them during or terme that they are s● demised or pawned 22 E. 4. fo 10. 34 H. 8 Br. pledges 28. As as if a man bona fide lease his Sheep or Oxen for years or if he

go according to those agreements nature and reason allowing those provisions which equity and honesty is the use and the use being created in this sort the statute of 27 H. 8. containeth the estates of the Land as the use is appointed and so this covenant to stand seised to uses is at this day a conveyance of land and with this difference from a bargaine and sale in that this needs no inrolement nor needeth not to be a writing indented as a bargain and sale must and if the party to whose use he agreeth to stand seised of the land be not wife or Child Cosin or one that hee meaneth to marry then will no use arise and so no conveyance Vpon a fine Feoffement or recovery a man may limit the use to whom he will without consideration of bloud or money otherwise in a bargaine and sale or Covenant for although the law alloweth such weighty considerations of marriage and bloud to raise uses yet doth it not admit so trifling considerations as of acquaintance Schooling service or the like but where a man maketh an estate of his land to others by Fine Feoffment or Recovery he may then appoint the use to whom he listeth without respect of marriage kindred money or other thing it is not so when he maketh an Estate but agreeth to stand seised nor when he hath taken any thing as in the cases of Bargaine and Sale and Covenant to stand seised to Uses The last of the six conveyances is a Will in writing which course of conveyance was first ordained by the statute of 32 H. 8. before which statute no man might give land by will except it were in a Burrowgh-Towne where there was a speciall custome that men might give their lands by Will as in Lond. and many other places In what manner the statute of 32. H. 8. giveth power to dispose of lands by Wil. By the Statute of 32 H 8. a man may give lands by will in this sort first it must be by Will in writing Secondly he must be seised of an estate in Fee-simple for tenant for another mans life or tenant in taile cannot give lands by Will by that statute If a man be seised of Capite Lands and Socage he cannot devise but two parts of the whole Thirdly he must be solely seised and not jointly with another and then being thus seised for all the Land he holdeth in socage being tenure he may give it by the Will except he holdeth any peece of Land in capite by Knights service of the King and laying all his lands together he can give but two parts by will for the third part of the whole aswell in socage as in capite must discend to the heire to answer Wardship Livery and Primmer seisin to the Crowne And so if he hold Lands by Knights service of a subject he can devise but two parts of his Lands and the Lord by Wardship and the heire by discent is to hold A conveyance by devise of Capite Lands to the wife for her Joyner or to his Children for their good or to pay debt is void for a third part by 32 H. 8. And if a man that hath three Acres of Land holden in capite by Knights service do make a Jointure to his wise of one and convey another to any of his children or to friends to take the profits to pay his debts or Legacies or daughters portions then the third Acre or any part therof he cannot give by Will but must suffer it to descend to the heir and that must satisfie Wardship Yet a man having three acres as before may convey all to his wife and children by conveyance in his life time as by Feoffment Fine Recovery Bargaine and Sale or Covenant to stand seised to Uses and to disinherit the Heire but if the Heire be within age when the Father dieth the King or other Lord shal have that Heire in VVard and shall have one of the three acres during the VVardship to sue Livery and primer Seisin But at full age the Heire shall have no part of it but it shall go according to the conveyance made by the Father It hath been debated how the Thirds shall be set forth for it is the use The King nor Lord can intermeddle if a full third part be left to descend to the heir Entailed lands part of the Thirds that all lands which the Father leaveth to descend to the Heire being Fee-simples or in taile must be part of the Thirds and if it be a full Third then the King nor Heire nor Land can intermeddle with the rest if it be not a full Third yet they must take it so much as it is and have a supply out of the rest This supply is thus to be taken if it be the Kings VVard then by a Commission out of the Court of VVards whereupon a Jury upon Oath may set downe so much as shall make up the Thirds except the Officers of the Court of VVards can otherwise agree with the parties if there be no VVardship due to the King then the other Lord is to have a supply by a Commission out of the Chancery and a Jury thereupon But in all the Cases these Statutes do give power to him that maketh the VVill The Statute giveth power to the Testator to set out the Thirds himselfe and if it be not a third part yet the King or Lord must take that in part and have a supply out of the rest to set forth and appoint of himselfe which lands shall go for the Thirds and neither King nor Lord can refuse it and if it be not enough yet they must take that in part and onely have a supply in manner as before is mentioned out of the rest A Feoffment made to the use of ones VVill if his VVill be declared before or at the time of his Feoffment it cannot be altered because it is executed otherwise it is if his Will be declared afterwards 20 H. 7. 11. vide fol. 27. b. What persons may make Leases at this day There be three kinds of persons at this day which may make Leases for three lives c. in such sort as hereafter is expressed which could not so do when Littleton wrote Any person seised of an Estate in Fee-simple in the right of his Church and any person seised of an Estate in Fee-taile in his owne right Any Husband and VVife seised of any Estate of Inheritance in Fee or in Fee-taile in the right of his wife or joyntly with his wife before the Coverture or after viz. The Tenant in taile by Deed to bind his Issues in taile but not the Reversion or Remainder The Bishop by Deed without the Deane and Chapiter to bind his Successors the husband and wife by Deed to bind the wife and her and their Heires and these are made good by the Statute of 32 H. 8. which enableth them thereunto but to the making

the perticular Tenant If a man hath issue a Son of nine yeares and makes a Lease till his son shall come to his full age then the remainder to another in Fee nothing vesteth forthwith to him in remainder and the remainder is utterly void and yet it may take effect because the remainder ought to passe out of the lessor forthwith executed or executory either to him in remainder or to be in abeyance or custodie of the Law and a franktenement in such case cannot be an abeyance and therefore the remainder void Lease for yeares the remainder over in Fee if the tenant enter before livery his terme is good but the remainder is void because the remainder was not out of the lessor at the time of the possession taken by the particular tenant but if I appoint the Lease to commence at Michaelmas next the remainder over in Fee there although the lessor make Livery to the Lessee yet the Livery and Seisin and the remainder shall be void because there was no estate present whereunto the Livery may be annexed and whereunto it might unite in the meane time HEE to whom the remainder is appointed must at that very time be a person able and of capacity to take the remainder or else the remainder shall be void and it is a principle in Law that in all gifts be they by devise or otherwise it behooveth to have a Donee in esse which hath power and capacity to take the thing given at the very time when it ought to vest for if there be not any such in rerum natura when the thing ought to vest There is a diversity between a remainder limited by a particular name for a remainder limited by a general name may be good though the person be not in esse at the time of the remainder limited as in this case next following This remainder to I S may be good yet he hath no heir at the time of the remainder limited so of a remainder limited Primogenito filio But a remainder limited in particular by name of Baptisme and Sirname is not good if the partie be not in esse Coke 2. part Fo. 51. Sir Hugh Cholmleis case the gift shall be void Plowden Fol. 345. And therefore if a Lease be made to one for life the remainder to the Mayor and Commonalty of Cirencester which then have not capacity to purchase Lands and after they have gained a capacity to purchase and then the tenant for life dyeth the Mayor and commonalty shall not take the remainder because he was not a person able at the time of the remainder appointed to take it so if the remainder were appointed to him whom tenant for life shall name If a Lease be made to one for life the remainder to I. S. in Fee who is a monke professed and afterwards is derained and then the Tenant for life dyeth I. S. shall not have the remainder because he was not a person able to take it at the time of the remainder appointed But if Land be given to one Et filio suo primogenito and he hath no issue at the time of the gift and afterwards he hath a son that Son shall have the Land by way of remainder and yet the remainder was not out of the lessor neither did it vest at the time of the Livery but the law shall conster the Livery and limitation most strong against the lessor Plowden 296. Lessee for yeares the remainder to the right heires of I. S. this remainder is utterly voide and the Livery thereupon is voide because there is no person capable to take the Franke tenement at the time and Livery Seisin may not be in suspence where the frank-tenement may not be in obeysance but Affees may where the franck-Tenement is well disposed and where there is a Tenant thereof to the Precipe THe thing whereof a Remainder shall be created must be in esse before and at the time of the appointment and creation thereof or else the remainder is voide For if I grant a rent out of my Land Vide fo 38. the remainder in Fee this remainder is void because the rent was not in esse before But at the beginning of a grant a man may grant a rent in such manner as pleaseth him And a man may grant a rent newly created to begin after the death of I. S. But when a rent is in esse or a reversion remainder or other thing a man may not make it to be in esse for a time and to cease for another time as to grant it to one after the death of another or from a day to come reserving to him an estate in the meane time NO remainder may commence upon any repugnancie or impossibility precedent nor upon any condition that goeth to the destruction of the perticular estate for conditions alwaies inure in a privity so that none shall take advantage of conditions but those which are privies for none shall enter for a condition broken but onely the Feoffor donor and Lessor and their heires And as none shall avoide an estate formerly made by the breach of a condition but onely the privies see none shall take a new estate by the performance of a condition but onely the privies If a Lease be made to two the remainder over in Fee after the death of the first of them this remainder is voide because the Servivor shall hold place after the death of the first and therefore repugnant and void If a Lease be made for life the remainder for life and if the first tenant for life dy then the remainder over to a stranger over in Fee this remainder dependeth on a repugnancy precedent and therefore voide If a Lease be made for yeares rendant rent and upon condition of none payment the remainder to a stranger and Livery is made accordingly that is a void remainder which doth commence upon a repugnancy precedent and which dependeth upon a condition which goeth to the destruction of the perticular estate and especially where such a remainder is created by livery and sesin But by a limitation of a devise or by limitation of use such remainder is good as a Feoffment to the use of I. S. for years and upon payment by him of twenty pounds the remainder to I. D. for life this is a good remainder So it is where the remainder is created by the limitation of a last will as if a man devise his Lands to his wife c. If a man make a Lease for life rendant rent and upon condition that if the rent be behind then the remainder to a stranger in Fee after the first estate ended that remainder is void because conditions inure alwaies in a privity c Lessee for life upon condition that if I.S. pay the lessor twenty pounds that then the lessor shall enter upon Tenant for life and then the remainder over to another that remainder is void because by the

of the Indenture or from the day of the date or from the day of the making or from the day of the sealing and delivery such leases are meerly void for the date is excluded and the lessee may not enter untill the morrow for when a man makes a lease for life to commence at a day to come he may not make present livery to a future estate and therfore in such case nothing passeth and Livery or Attornment afterwards will never make a void Grant to be good Coke 5. pars fol. 94. 2. pars fol. 55. If a Lease be made for years or at Will by Deed and Livery and Seisin be made to the Lessee yet he is but Tenant for years or Tenant at Will according to the limitation of the Deed and not Tenant for life by force of the livery But if a lease be made for years the Remainder to a stranger for life and livery is made to the Lessee who enters this livery shall vest the Remainder in the stranger and if the Lessee enter by force of his lease before livery be made unto him then the Remainder is void Condition where an en●ry is reserved to a stranger vide casus tertium prox sequent A man enfeoffeth one upon condition that he shall pay ten pounds to B. and upon default that B. shall enter now if the rent be not paid the Feoffee may enter in Law and Conscience and not B. for he is a stranger to the Condition and B. hath no remedy in Conscience to have the land And when the Feoffment is made upon Condition although it doth not speak that for default of payment he may re-enter yet that is implied in the word Condition and as to the words that B. shall enter by default of payment they are void words Doctor Student fol. 93. Condition for non-payment of rent and then an Assise is brought or a Distress taken If a Condition be broken for non-payment of rent yet if the Feoffor bring an Assise for rent due at that time he shall never enter for the Condition broken because he affirmeth the rent to have continuance and whereby waiveth the condition and so it is if the rent had had a clause of Distresse annexed unto it if the Feoffor had distrained for the rent for non-payment whereof the condition was broken he should never enter for the condition broken but he may receive that rent and acquit the same and yet enter for the condition broken Acceptance of rent barreth a re-entry But if he accept a rent due at another day after he shall not enter for the condition broken because he thereby affirmeth the lease to have continuance Coke Lit. fol. 211. b. If a man enfeoff one by Indenture by which it is covenanted and agreed that the Feoffee shall pay to a stranger and his Heires ten pounds per annum at a certaine day and if he faile that the stranger and his Heires may enter in that case if the Feoffee doth not pay it the stranger shall have use of the land in conscience and not by the common law and shall have a Subpaena to constraine the Feoffee to make an estate unto him But in the said case if it had been upon condition that a stranger may enter for non-payment of the rent there the Feoffor himself shall enter and not the stranger for none may enter for a condition annexed to Fee but for lives and when the Feoffor hath entred he is not holden to convey the land to a stranger that ought to have the Rent Doctor Student 100. 101. In Mary Portingtons case Coke 10. pars fol. 39. Incidents to an estate taile It was observed and agreed for Law that to an Estate-taile there are three manner of incidents some by the common Law some by Act of Parliament and some by custome by the common law they are such which are not restrained by the Statute and may not be restrained by any condition 22 E. 3. 17. as Dower and Tenant by the curtesie after issue are incident to an Estate taile and may not be restrained by any condition An Estate taile cannot be restrained by any condition or limitation vide Coke 9. pars fol. 128. 6. pars Sir Anth. Mildmaies case Recovery fraudulent Also the Estate of him and Tenant in taile after possibility are dispunishable for Waste And collaterall Warranty is a bar to the Estate-taile and so is a common recovery also and none of these may be restrained by any condition or limitation by the Statute law as to make leases by the Statute of 32 H. 8. cap. 36. and to levie a Fine by the Statute 4 H. 7 cap. 24. and 33 H. 8. cap. 36. to bar Issues and none of those which are incidents to that Statute by act of Parliament may be restrained by condition for when a man maketh a Gift in taile he tacire doth give these incidents thereunto And therefore to restraine them by condition or limitation shall be repugnant And as to the case upon the Statute of 11 H. 7. it was answered that when the husband for advancement of the wife with competent Joynture and preferment of their Heires of their two bodies engendred hath caused an estate to be made to himself and to his wife in tail and after the deaths of the husband the wives to disinherit the issues of their former husbands suffer recoveries and convey the land to strangers of the bloud of the husband such recovery was worthy by the Parliament to be noted with the marke to be suffered by Covin And the act of the wife either when she is sole or with her and her second husband is so odious that a recovery had upon a good title against them by Covin is made void by the said Act. Fraud So in the said Acts of 32. H 8. and 14. Eliz. when a common recovery was had against Tenant for life to the prejudice of those who had the inheritance that may be well termed covenous and by collusion and yet in the same case when tenant for life the remainder to A. in taile the remainder to B. in taile c. with divers remainders over and Tenant for life suffereth a common recovery wherin he voucheth A. and he the common vouchee that shall bind all the other remainders for no Covin or collusion may bee supposed when the next in remainder in taile which hath the immediate inheritance is vouchee as it was adjudged in Jennings case Fraudulent conveyances to defraud purchasors Vide plus de hoc fo 18. 27 E. cap. 4. every Conveyance Grant Charge Lease Estate incumbrance and limitation of use of Lands Tenements or Hereditaments made since the beginning of her Majesties Raigne or hereafter to be made for the defrauding of Purchasors of the Land it selfe or any part or profit out of it shall be void against the person so purchasing for money or other good consideration and against all

to the Execution of uses then to estates which are executed by the ancient common law vide fo 51. In proofe whereof it was resolved by all the Justices of England Pasch 35. Eliz. in the Earle of Bedfords case which was such Francis Earle of Bedford made a Feoffment in fee of diverse Mannors to the use of himselfe for years after to the use of Jo. L. Russel his son and heir apparent and the heires males of his body begotten and for default of such issue to the right heires of the said Earle and afterward the said Jo. L Russel died without issue male in the life of the said Earle and it was resolved that the use and the estate limited by way of remainder ought to vest during the particular estate prima pars Co. fo 129. 130. If a man make a feoffment in fee to the use of himselfe for life and after to the use of his first Son to be begotten in taile and tenant for life dies or makes a feoffment in fee before the birth of his son the remainder is destroyed for ever and so in this case if tenant for life die his wife privily with child and then a son is borne that issue shall not have the use ut opinor A Lease to A. for life the remainder to the right heires of B. B. having a daughter dieth his wife being privily enceint with a Son the daughter claimeth that by purchase and therefore the son born afterwards shall never divest it Coke 1. pars fo 95. Shellies case Forfeiture De pace regis regni tit forfeiture fo 222. THe King shall have all the goods of Felons which be condemned What goods of Felons the King shall have and which be fugitive viz. all their goods moveable and unmoveable for the King shall have the corne growing upon the land of the felon attainted and the issues and profits of the Land which he hath in his owne right or in the right of his wife during the time of his life Forfeiture●… upon flying or untill he doth purchase his pardon But touching the profits of fugitives lands there is a difference between a flying presented before a Coroner and a flying found by verdict upon an acquittall for upon a flying presented before the Coroner he shall forfeit the profits of his lands untill his death or untill he be acquit or untill he hath purchased the Kings pardon But upon a flying found by verdict upon acquittall he shall forfeit no issues of his Lands for by his acquittal the Land is discharged and consequently the issues thereof The law hath restrained offendors in treason and Felony to certaine times to make alienation of their Lands and goods and hath prefixed limits From what time forfeiture of lands shall have relation whereunto the forfeiture of their said lands and goods shall have relation and yet with this difference that as soone as any treason or Felony is committed the offender therin is restrained to make any alienation of his lands for then it is not his land but by the committing of the treason or felony he hath forfeited all the estate he had therin and therfore if between the time of the committing of the treason or felony of the offenders attainder thereof the offender doth make an alienation or assurance of his land after the time that the offender shall be attainted of the same treason or Felony the said assurance shall be void whether the same attainder be by verdict confession or utlary for the forfeiture of the land shall have relation from the time of the offence committed From what time the forfeiture of goods shall have relation The forfeiture of Goods and Chattels shall not look back so far as forfeiture of lands nor shall have relation from the time of the treason or felony committed but from the time of the attainder of the treason or Felony and therfore if one do commit treason or felony and in the meane time between the treason or felony committed and the offendors attainder therof the offendor doth give away his goods this is a good gift for as yet they be not forfeit but be his owne to maintain himselfe his family untill he be attainted and by the law adjudged unworthy to possesse or enjoy goods or to have sustenance and therefore if upon a fugam fecit presented before the Coroner one doth forfeit his goods he shall not forfeit those goods he had at the time of the felony committed but shall only forfeit those goods which he had at that day when the fugam fecit was presented against him and in like sort if one that is indicted of Felony be acquitted thereof by verdict and in their verdict the Jury finde that the Prisoner fled for the felony in this case the Prisoner shall forfeit those goods which hee had the day of the verdict given and not any goods which hee had before And so it is if one be convict by verdict the goods shall bee forfeited which the offender had the day of the verdict given and not those he had before and he that is outlawed of treason or felony shall forfeit those goods which he hath at the time of the Exigent awarded and not those which he had before and hath aliened But if a man commit treason or felony and is arrested therof and as he is carrying to a Justice to be examined or to the Goale by the Constables or others doe break away or in making of rescous or resistance is slaine by those which doe so carry him because he will not yield and be justified by the law in this case those goods shall be forfeited which he had at the time of the felony committed and so it is if one commit a felony and when the Sheriff Coroner Constable or others do attempt to apprehend him he is slaine because he doth resist and will not yeild to be arrested the goods shall be forfeited which he hath at the time of the felony committed Note this difference is to be observed in the seising of a Felons goods for where the goods be forfeited before the felony tryed as where one is found guilty before the Coroner of the death of another or where it is found before the Coroner that one did fly for a felony in such case the goods shall be presently seised upon the forfeiture of them though there be no conviction of the felon and upon such forfeiture the goods be presently the Kings the felon is to have no maintenance out of them Daltons office of Sheriffs tit forfeiture fo 32. And yet lest the goods should be disorderly wasted imbesseled or sold away the Sheriffe c. before the attainder of the felon may take surety that the goods be not imbesseled c. ss may cause the owner or some of his friends to finde surety and for want of sureties the Sheriffe c. may seise them and deliver them to the towne ss