by purchase by his own Contract that which he cannot retain against the King yet the Law will not enable him by an Act of its own to transfer by hereditary descent the Alien dying his issue a Denizon born the Land will not descend or to take by an Act in Law for the Law Quae nihil facit frustra will not give him an inheritance or free-hold by an Act in Law for he cannot keep it Therefore the Law will not give him 1. By discent 2. By courtesey 3. By Dower 4. By Guardianship And in respect of that incapacity he ressembles a Person Attaint but with this difference The Law looks upon a Person attaint as one that it takes notice of and therefore the eldest Son attainted over-living the Father though he shall not take by descent in respect of his disability yet he shall hinder the descent to the younger But if the eldest Son be an Alien the Law takes no notice of him and therefore as he shall not take by descent so he shall not impede the descent to the yonger Brother As for instance if there be three Brothers the eldest an Alien the other two naturalized and the middle Brother purchase and dyes without issue the younger Brother shall have the Lands III. Concerning the Rules of descents we are not to govern our selves therein by the general notions of love or proximity of nature but by the municipal Ltws of the Countrey wherein the question ariseth for the various Laws of divers Countreys have variously disposed the manner of descents even in the same line and degree of proximity For instance the Father certainly is as near of kin to the Son as the Son is to the Father and is nearer in proximity than a Brother and therefore shall he preferred as next of kin in administration to the Sons Estate According to the Jews for want of issue of the Son the Father succeeds excluding the Brothers and that hath been the use and construction of the Jewish Doctors upon numb 27. 9. but the Mother was wholly excluded 2. According to the provision of the Greeks for the succession or exclusion of the Father is left doubtful 3. By the Roman or Civil Law according to the estimation of the twelve Tables the Father succeeded in the purchase of the Son for want of issue of the Son under the title proximit agnato and so was the use but my Lord Cook supposes the contrary But taking the whole Institution of Justinian the Son dying without issue his Brothers Sisters Father or Mother do succeed him as well to Land as goods in a kind of Copercenary 4. According to the Laws of Normandy which in some things have a cognition with our Law his Brothers are preferred before the Father if the Son dye issueless but his Father before his Uncle 5. According to the Laws of England the Son dying sans issue or Brothers or Sisters the Father cannot succeed but it descends to the Uncle IV. There be two kinds of descents according to the Common Laws of this Realm 1. Lineal from the Father or Grand-father to Son or Grand-son 2. Collateral or transversed as from Brother to Sister Uncle to Nephew and e converso And both these again of two sorts 1. Immediate as in lineals from Father to Son 2. Mediate as in lineals from Grand-father to Grand-child where the Father dying in the life time of the Grand-father is the medium differens of the descent Collateral as in lineal from Uncle to Nephew or e converso And this meditae descent or meditate Ancestor though to many purposes it be immediate for the Father dying in the life of the Grand-father the Son succeeds in point of descent in the Lands immediately to the Grand-father and in a writ of Entry shall be supposed to be in by the Grand-father and not in the post cui This is called a mediate descent because the Father is the medium through whom the Son derives his title to the Grand-father In immediate descents there can be no impediment but what arises in the parties themselves For instance the Father seized of Lands the impediment that hinders the descent must be in the Father or Son as if either of them attaint or an Alien In mediate descents a disability of being an Alien or Attaint in him that is called the medius antecessor will disable a Person to take by descent though he himself have no such disability In lineal descents if the Father be Attaint or an Alien and hath issue a Denizon born and dye in the life time of the Grand-father the Grand-father dyes seized the Son shall not take but the Land shall escheat In Collateral descents A. and B. brothers A. is an Alien or attaint has issue C. a Denizon born B. purchases Lands and dyes without issue C. shall not inherit because A. which was the medius antecessor or medium differens is uncapable V. But in any descents the impediment in an Ancestor that is not medius antecessor from whom and to whom will not impede the discent As for instance the Grand-father and Grand-mother both Aliens or attaint of Treason have issue the Father a Denizon who hath issue the Son a natural born subject the Father purchases Lands and dyes the Son shall be Heir to the Father notwithstanding the disability of the Grand-father and yet all the blood which the Father hath is derived from his disabled Parents for they are not medii antecessores between the Father and the Son but paramont The Law does not hinder but that an Alien is of the same degree and relation of consanguinity as natural born Subjects or Denizons born the Son Father and Brother though Aliens the Son Father and Brother our Law takes notice of as well as natural born Subjects and so it was adjudged for he shall be preferred in Administration though an Alien as next of Kin. But in cases of Inheritance the Law takes no notice of him and therefore as he shall not take by descent so he shall not impede the descent to the younger Brother As for instance A an Alien B. and C. naturalized by Act of Parliament brothers B. purchases Lands and dyes sine prole C. shall inherit and not A. A. an Alien B. and C. his Brothers both naturalized by Act of Parliament B. purchases Lands and dâ—…es wâ—…th out issue the same shall not come to A nor to his issue though a Denizon but shall come to C. and his issue the Law taking no notice of A. as to impede the succession of C. or his issue though it work a consequential disability to bar the issue of A. parallel to what the Law calls corruption of blood which is a consequent of Attainder VI. Again in lineal descents if there be a Grandfather natural born Subject Father an Alien Son natural born subject the Father is made Denizon he shall not inherit the
Grand-father and if the Father dyes in the life of the Grand-father the Grand-child though born after the denization doth not remove neither the personal nor consequential impediments or incapacity of the Father In collateral descents the Father a natural born Subject has issue two Sons Aliens who are both made Denizons and dyes without issue the other shall not inherite him A. an Alien marries an English woman who is seized of Lands and has issue the Father and Mother dyes yet the issue may inherite the Mother non obstante the incapacity of the Father being an Alien VII The Statute de Natis ultra Mare declares the issue born of an English-man upon an English-woman shall be a Denizon yet the construction has been though an English Merchant marry a Forraigner and has issue by her born beyond the Seas that issue is a natural born Subject But if an English-woman go beyond the Sea and there marry an Alien and have issue born beyond the Sea that issue are Aliens If an English-woman marries an Alien beyond the Seas and than comes into England and has issue they are not Aliens but may inherit My Lord Cook in his Commentaries on Littleton seems to be of opinion that if an Alien has issue two Sons born in England one dying without issue the other shall not inherit him But the Law is otherwise taken at this day as I conceive the reasons that have been given are I. Though the descent from one Brother to another Brother be a collateral descent yet it is an immediate descent and consequently if no disability or impediment can be found in them no impediment in another Ancestor will hinder the descent between them That this is an immediate descent appears First In point of pleading one Brother shall derive himself as Heir to another without mentioning any other Ancestor Secondly According to the computation of degrees Brother and Brother make but one degree and the Brother is distant from his Brother or Sister in the first degree of consanguinity and no more by the Laws of England According to the Civil Law Brother and Brother make but one degree for the Brother is in the second degree from the Brother yet both make but one degree According to the Canon Law Frater Frater or Frater Soror sunt in primo gradu And therefore the Laws prohibiting marriage between Kindred in the fourth degree takes Brother and Sister to be the first degree of the four The Laws of England in computation of the degrees of consanguinity agrees with the Canon Law and reckons the Brother and Brother to be the first degree Herewith agrees the Customs of Normandy which though in some cases differs from the Laws of England yet herein and in divers other particulars touching descents they agree Another evidence to prove that the descent between Brother is immediate is this viz. the descent between Brothers differs from all other collateral descents whatsoever for in other descents collateral the half blood does inherit but in a descent between Brother the half blood does impede the descent which argues that the descent is immediate The Uncle of the part of the Father has no more of the blood of the Mother than the Brother by the second venter the Brother by the second venter has the immediate blood of the Father with the Uncle viz. the Fathers Brother has not but only as they meet in the Grand father the Brother of the half blood is nearer of blood then the Uncle and therefore shall be preferred in Administration It is apparent that if in the line between Brother and Brother the Law takes notice how the Father was the medium thereof the Brother of the second venter should rather succeed the other Brother because he is Heir to the Father therefore in a descent between Brothers the Law respects only the immediate relation of the Brothers as Brothers and not in respect of the Father though it is true the foundation of their consanguinity is in their Father or Mother Again if the Father in case of a descent between Brothers were such an Ancestor as the Law lookt upon as the medium that derives the descent from the one Brother to the other then the Attainder of the Father would hinder the descent between the Brothers But the Attainder of the Father does not hinder the descent between the Brothers the reason is because the Father is not such a medium or nexus that is look'd upon by the Law as the means deriving such a descent between the two Brothers As for instance of three cases two whereof evince the first preposition viz. That although the descent from one Brother to another Brother though it be a Collateral descent yet is an immediate descent and that if no disability or impediment arises in them no impediment in another Ancestor will hinder them The younger Brother has issue and is attainted of Treason and dyes the elder Brother has title to a petition of right dyes sans issue without a restitution the younger Brothers Son has lost that title for though the title were in the Ancestor that was not attaint yet his Father that is the medium whereby he must convey that title was attaint and so the descent was obstructed Henry Courtney had issue Edward and was attainted of Treason and dyed Edward purchased Lands and dyed without issue the Sisters and Heirs of Henry were disabled to inherit Edward yet neither Edward nor his Aunts were attainted or their blood corrupted yet because Henry was the medium through whom the Aunts must derive their pedigree and consanguinity to Edward who was attainted the descent was obstructed till a restitution in blood But if the Grand-father of Edward had been attainted and not Henry this would not have hindred the descent from Edward to the Aunts because that Attainder had been paramount that consanguinity which was between Henry and his Sister and that is proved by this third case William Hobby had issue Phillip and Mary and was attainted of Treason and dyed Phillip purchases Lands and dyed without issue it was adjudged in that case that non obstante the Attainder of William Hobby Mary should inherit because the descent and pedigree between Phillip and Mary was immediate and the Law regards not the disability of the Father If the Heir of the part of the Father be attaint the Land shall escheat and shall never descend to the Heir of the part of the Mother but if the Son purchase Lands and has no kindred of the part of the Father but an Alien it shall descend to the Heirs of the part of the Mother IX Those that are born sub side legiantia obedientia Domini Reges are not Aliens and therefore those that were born in Gascoyne Normandy Acquitaine Turnay Callice Guyan whilst they were under the Dominion of the Kings of England were natural born Subjects and
yet it does not wholly remove the disease or non-ability as to the points of descent or hereditary transmission and resembles a Person in case of an Attainder and therefore if he purchases Lands and dyes without issue the Lord by Escheat shall have the Lands And therefore in lineal descents if there be a Grand-father natural born Subject Father an Alien Son natural Subject the Father is made Denizon he shall not inherit the Grand-father and if the Father dyes in the life of the Grand-father the Grand-child though born after the Denization shall not inherit the Grand-father for the Denization does not remove neither the personal nor the consequential impediment or incapacity of the Father So likewise in Collateral descents As for instance the Father a Natural born Subject has issue two Sons Aliens who are both made Denizens and one dyes the other shall not inherit him XII The like Law in Dower a Man seized of Lands in Fee and takes an Alien to Wife and then dyes the Wife shall not be endowed But if the King takes an Alien to Wife and dyes his Widdow Queen shall be endowed by the Law of the Crown Edmund Brother of King Edward the I. married the Queen of Navarre and dyed and it was resolved by all the Judges that she should be endowed of the third part of all the Lands whereof her Husband was seized in Fee A Jew born in England takes to Wife a Jew born also in England the Husband is converted to the Christian Faith purchaseth Lands and enfeoffeth another and dyeth the Wife brought a Writ of Dower and was barred of her Dower Quia vero contra justitiam est quod ipsa dotem petat vel habeat de temento quod fuit viri sui ex quo in conversione sua noluit cum eo adhaerere cum eo convert If an Alien be a Disseisor and obtains Letters of Denization and then the Disseisor release unto him the King shall not have the Land for the release hath altered the Estate and it is as it were a new purchase otherwise it is as if the Alien had been the feo ffee of the Deseissee And though Aliens are enabled by Charter of Denization to a transmission Hereditary to their posterity of Lands yet a Denizon is not capable of Honour nor a transmission of the same without Naturalization by Parliament for by the Charter of Denization he is made quasi seu tanquam ligens but to be a Member of Parliament he must be ligens revera non quasi for by his becoming a Noble-man he claims the place of Judicature in Parliament the which he cannot till naturalized by Act of Parliament and then he may claim as eligible to the same or any other CHAP. IV. Of Aliens and Crials per meditatem where allowed and where not I. Of the manner of Aliens obtaining Trials per medietatem at the Common-Law and of the Antiquity of the same II. Of the making the same a Law universal within this Realm as to some Persons afterwards general as to all III. Of the Writ and some Observations on the summons of such an Inquest IV. Of the opportunity lost or gained by praying this immunity V. Of the awarding of Tales upon request on such Enquiries VI. Where this immunity does not extend in Aliens and where it does in matters Civil and Criminal VII Of the validity of a witness Alien and of an Infidel VIII The tittle of a Renegadoe IX Of the benefit of the Kings Pardon whether it extends to an Alien whose abode is here but happens to be absent at the time of the promulging I. TRiatio Bilinguis or per medietatem linguae by the Common-Law was wont to be obtained by Grant of the King made to any Company of Strangers as to the Society of Lumbards or Almaignes or to any other Corporation or Company when any of them were impleaded the moyety of the Enquest should be of their own Tongue this Trial per medietatem in England is of great Antiquity for in some cases Trials per medietatem was before the Conquest Viri duodeni Jure Consulti sex Walliae totidem Anglis Wallis jus dicanto and as the Commentator observes it was called duodecem Virale Judicium II. This immunity afterwards being found commodious to us Islanders became universal for by the Statute of 27. E. 3. cap. 8. It was enacted that in Pleas before the Major of the Staple if both Parties were Strangers the Trial should be by Strangers but if one Party was a Stranger and the other a Denizon then the Trial should be per medietatem Linguae But this Statute extended but to a narrow compass viz. Only where both Parties were Merchants or Ministers of the Staple and Pleas before the Major of the Staple But afterwards in the 28th Year of the same Kings Reign it was enacted That all manner of Enquests which was to be taken or made amongst Aliens and Denizons be they Merchants or others as well before the Maior of the Staple as before any other Justices or Ministers Although the King be party the one half of the Enquest or proof shall be Denizens the other half Aliens if so many Aliens and Forreigners be in the Town or Place where such Enquest or proof is to be taken that be not Parties nor with the Parties in Contract in Plea or other quarrel whereof such Enquest or proof ought to be taken and if there be not so many Aliens then shall there be put in such Enquests or proofs as many Aliens as shall be found in the same Town or Places which be not thereto Parties as aforesaid is said and the remnant of Denizens which be good men and not suspicious to the one Party or other By which Statute the same Custom or immunity was made a Law universal although it be in the Case of the King for the Alien shall have his Trial per medietatem It matters not whether the moyety of Aliens be of the same Country as the Alien party to the action is for he may be a Dutch-man and they Spaniards French Walloons c. because the Statute speaks generally of Aliens III. The Form of the Venire facias in this case is De Nicenet c. quorum una medietas fit de Indigenis altera medietas fit de aliegenis natis c. And the Sheriff ought to return twelve Aliens and twelve Denizâ—…ns one by the other with Addition which of them are Aliens and so they are to be sworn but if this Order be not observed it is holpen as a misreturn It has been conceived of some that it is not proper to call it a Trial per medietatem Linguae because any Alien of any Tongue may serve but that surely is no Objection for People are distinguished by their Language and medietas Linguae is as much as to say half English and half of another
not Aliens Scotland is a Kingdom by union and therefore those that were born in Scotland under the allegiance of the King as of his Kingdom of Scotland before the Crown came united were Aliens born and such plea against such Persons was a good plea but those that were born since the Crown of England descended to King James are not Aliens for they were born sub side legiantia Domini Regis so those that are born at this day in Uirginia New England Barbadoes Jamaiâ—…a or any other of his Majesties Plantations and Dominions are natural born Subjects and not Aliens so likewise those that are born upon the King of England's Seas are not Aliens X. But if an Alien be made an Abbot Prior Bishop or Dean the plea of an Alien we shall not disable him to to bring any real or mixt action concerning the possessions that he hold in his politique capacity because the same is brought in auter droit The like Law is for an Executor or Administrator because the recovery is to anothers use If an action is brought against an Alien and there is a Verdict and Judgment against him yet he may bring a writ of Error and be plaintif there and that such plea is not good in that case Though an Alien may purchase and take that which he cannot keep nor retain yet the Law hath provided a mean of enquiry before he can be devested of the same for until Office be found the free-hold is in him And this Office which is to gain to the King a Fee or Free-hold must be under the Great Seal of England for a Commission under the Exchequer Seal is not sufficient to entitle the King to the Lands of an Alien born for the Commission is that which gives a title to the King for before that the King hath no title but in cases of Treason there upon Attainder the Lands are in the King without Office and in that case to inform the Court a Commission may go out under the Echequer Seal XI If an Alien and a Subject born purchase Lands to them and to their Heirs they are joint tenants and shall join in Assize and the Survivor shall hold place till Office found By the finding of this Office the party is out of possession if the same be of Houses or Lands or such things as do lye in livery but of Rents Common advowsons and other Inheritances incorporeal which lye in grant the Alien is not out of possession be they appendant or in gross therefore if an Information or an Action be brought for the same the party may traverse the Office in that Court where the Action or Information is brought for the King And if the King obtains not the possession within the year after the Office found he cannot seize without a scire facias It is not for the Honour of the King an Alien purchasing of a Copyhold to seize the same for that the same is a base tenure and so it was adjudged where a Copy-hold was surrendred to J. S. in trust that one Holland an Alien should take the profits thereof to his own use and benefit upon an Inquisition taken it was adjudged the same was void and should be quashed because the King cannot be entitled to the Copyhold Lands of an Alien nor to the use of Copyhold Lands as the principal case was An Alien Infant under the age of 21 years cannot be a Merchant Trader within this Realm nor can he enter any goods in his own name at the Custom-house If an Englishman shall go beyond the Seas and shall there become a sworn Subject to any Forraign Prince or State he shall be look'd upon in the nature of an Alien and shall pay such Impositions as Aliens if he comes and lives in England again he shall be restored to his liberties An Alien is robbed and then he makes his Executor and dyes and afterwards the goods are waift the Lord of the Franchise shall not have them but the Executors Vide Stat. 13. E. 4. All personal actions he may sue as on a Bond so likewise for words for the Common Law according to the Laws of Nations protects Trade and Traffique and not to have the benefit of the Law in such cases is to deny Trade CHAP. III. Of Naturalization and Denization I. Whether the Kings of England can naturalize without Act of Parliament II. What operation Naturalization hath in reference to remove the disability arising from themselves III. What operation naturalization hath as in reference to remove deffects arising from a lineal or collateral Ancestor IV. A Kingdom conquered and united to the Crown of England whether by granting them a power to make Laws can implicitely create in them such a Soveraignty as to impose on the Realm of England V. Of Persons naturalized by a Kingdom dependant whether capable of imposing on one that is absolute VI. Of Kingdoms obtained by conquest how the Empire of the same is acquired and how the Conqueror succeeds VII Ireland what condition it was accounted before the Conquest as in reference to the Natives of the same and whether by making it a Kingdom they can create a Forraigner as a natural born subject of England VIII Of Aliens as in reference to the transmission of their Goods Chattels by the Laws of France IX Of the Priviledges the Kings of England of old claimed in the Estates of Jews dying comorant here and how the same at this day stands X. Of Persons born in places annexed or claimed by the Crown of England how esteemed by the Laws of the same XI Of Denization and what operation it hath according to the Laws of England XII Where an Alien is capable of Dower by the Laws of England and where not and of the total incapacity of a Jew XIII Whether a Denizon is capable of the creation and retention of Honour by the Laws of England I. THe Father and the Mother are the fountain of the blood natural and as it is that that makes their Issue Sons or Daughters so it is that that makes them Brothers and Sisters but it is the civil qualifications of the blood that makes them inheritable one to the other and capable of enjoying the immunities and priviledges of the Kingdom but that is from another fountain viz. The Law of the Land which finding them legitimate doth transplant them into the Civil rights of the Land by an Act called Naturalization which does superinduce and cloath that natural consanguinity with a Civil hereditary quality whereby they are enabled not only to inherit each other but also to enjoy all the immunities and priviledges that meer natural born Subjects may or can challenge II. According to the Laws of Normandy the Prince might naturalize but such naturalization could not divest the descent already vested But according to our Law by no way but by Act of Parliament and that cures the defect as
for Decrees given in the Chancery in England which have been exemplyfied under the Great Seal directed to the Kings Lievtenant for the putting the same in execution there but in no case a Judgment given in England may be certified over under any other Seal but that of the Great one But in Scotland it is otherwise for that is a Kingdom absolute and not like Ireland which is a Crown annexed by Conquest but the other is by Union and though they be united under one Prince ad fidem yet their Laws are distinct so as if they had never been united and therefore the execution of the Judgments in each other must be done upon Request as above and that according to the Laws of Nations XI But in Collonies or Plantations which are reduced into the condition of great Families have not this Right of Requesting for they are governed by the Laws prescribed by the Souveraign of the same who may set Jurisdictions make them places priviledged not to have the Persons attached or arrested in any other places but within their own bounds so likewise upon their first forming or Institution may so declare that for any debt or Contract made or done in any place but in that of the same Plantation they shall not be impleaded and therefore in Virginia at this day if a Man contracts a debt in England flies to the same she cannot be there impleaded But if a Man takes up Goods and carries the same over thither there he may be sued in the place so likewise if it can be proved he carryed over the money borrow'd and this amongst others of the Laws and Constitutions of those Plantations is preserved inviolably the same being as it were a pledge and general safety which is given to those Inhabitants that shall resort thither and there plant themselves for the good of the Place and although those that thither flie by reason of great and unreparable losses have contracted debts far beyond their ability to satisfy a failer of which in strictness of Law may if the Creditor pleases oblidge their Bodies to Imprisonment yet doth it not thence follow that the same ought to exacted for though the Carcass of Men may gratify the revenge of the Creditor yet it never can pay the debt wherefore if those ends by themselves in a morall estimation be not necessary or if other ends on the opposit part occur not less profitable or necessary or if the ends proposed by Imprisonment may be attained another way it will then follow that if there be nothing of obligation on the Debtors part to render himself a Prisoner to the Creditor that then if the same can or may be avoided by flight the same in conscience may be done according to that of Cicero It was not fit perhaps to dismiss him being brought to Judgment but that he should be enquired after and brought to judgment was not necessary FINIS A Short Table of the Principal Matters contained in this Book Distinguished by Lib. for the Book Chap. for the Chapter and §. for the Paragraph Accessory Lib. Chap. § PYrat in the attempt kills a person by the Law Maritime the Slayer onely is Principall and the rest onely Accessories but by the Common Law otherwise 1. 4. 13 No Accessory to Pyracy can be tryed by virtue of the Stat. 28 H. 8. but he must be tryed in the Admiralty 1. 4. 23 26 Acceptance Acceptance of a Bill of Exchange what words amount to the same 2. 10. 15 20 Actions Actions of Trover will lye for an 8th or 16th part of a Ship 2. 1. 12 Admirals The reason of their power 1. 6. 5 Lib. Chap. § Admiral where 10th part of the Prize is due to him 1. 1. 〈◊〉 Admiral hath no Jurisdiction infra Corpus Com. 2. 2. 2 He may issue forth Commissions for the assembling of Court Martials 1. 14. 16 Execution of a Sentence of Death cannot be without his leave ibid. Agrument Made with Forraigners by the Commissioners of the Custome-House all persons Subjects shall have benefit of the same 2. 15. 3 Agreement for Freight where the same is determined by the fault of either party 2. 4. 3 Cannot be made with a Mariner for the Freightment of the Vessel 2. 4. 14 Averidge Vide Contribution Alien Not Capable of the Kings Pardon unless they were resident at the time the same was promulgated 3. 4. 7 Capable of taking but not of enjoying What they may hold and if they depart who will enjoy the same 3. 2. 1 Cannot transfer to his Heir to what he is disabled to hold 3. 2. 2 Alien marries an English Woman that is seized the Issue shall inherit 2. 2. 6 Though the Issue be born beyond the Seas shall inherit 3. 2. 7 Born in the Kings Dominions not Aliens Purchases Lands with a Natural born Subject to them and their heirs they are joynt-Joynt-Tenants 3. 2. 11 Aliens resident and Aliens travelling through France the difference bâ—…tween them as in reference to their Estates 3. 3. 8 Administration of an Alien's Estate may be committed to the next of Kin. 3. 3. 9 Diffâ—…rence between the Crowns of France and England in reference to the Births of persons born in places which they formerly possest 3. 3. 10 Alien in League his Action is only to be abated but in Enmity may conclude in barr 3. 4. 1 Alliances Alliances not determined by the death of the Prince 1. 7. 6 Ambassadors Where obliged not to Treat with any other but the Prince 1. 7. 4 How Regulated at the Congresse 1. 7. 5 Their Function 1. 10. 1 How protected though the Messengers of Rebels or Thieves 1. 10. 2 Violence or killing them how punishable 1. 10. 3 15 May be rejected and not received and when 1. 10. 4 Where punishable by the Lawes of Nations 1. 10. 5 6 14. 9 Are not to render account to none but to them that sent them 1. 10. 6 Not bound by any thing that is not malum in se jure gentium 1. 10. 10 Yet obliged to the formalities of Law 1. 10. 11 He may have Soveraign Jurisdiction over his Family by the concession of him with whom he resides 1. 10. 12 His Goods and Moveables cannot be seized on for any Civil matter 1. 10. 13 Ambassadors of Venice cannot receive any Present or preferment from any Forraign Prince or State 1. 10. 16 Bailio at Venice is the Ambassador for that Republique 1. 10. 6 Anchors Anchors may be placed for conveniency against the Owners will in other places 2. 9. 7 Not fastning of Buoyes to them punishable 2. 7. 7 Appeal Appeal lyes from the Commissioners of Assurances to the Lord Keeper 2. 7. 16 Assurance Assurances private and publique are both alike as in reference to the obtaining satisfaction 2. 7. 1 2 3 May be made on Ships or other things as well as Merchandize 2. 7. 4 Assurors are discharged upon the alteration of the property 2. 7. 13 They are not to answer