for when the lyuerie is missued it is as it had beene neuer sued Howebeit thys reseisure shall not bee wytheoute a Scire facias as I shall thereof speake more at large hereafter But yf the heyre or he that should sue lyuerie doe make a rightfull suite for the same according to thorder of the lawe and asmuche as in hym lyethe to do to haue liuerye howebeeit the kynge will not but willbee aduised ere hee make hym lyuerie and so protracte the time in this case his highenesse of ryghte maye not haue the profites from the tyme the partye was thus delayed but ought to restore theÌ„ vnto the partye vppon his lyuerye as maye appeare in the firste yeare of Henrye the seuenthe H. 1. H. 7. in Fits ti Liuery P. 18. And thereuppon it is to be noted that there be two kynde of lyueries the one generall the other speciall The generall is the liuerye that this statut speketh of the especial may be more properly treated of when wee come to the 12. chapiter of this prerogatiue And this generall lyuerie is sometime made cum exitibus and sometimes sine exitibus but for the most parte sine exitibus for wheare it is made cum exitibus from the time of the seisure there it is properlye noe liuerye for it appearethe the kynge neuer seised rightfully or by anye title As for example if the kynge will seise the lande that is founde in thoffice to be holden of Tharchebyshoppe of Canterburye or Byshoppe of Durham or anye suche persones as are exempted in the first chapiter of this prerogatiue in this case they shal haue an Ouster le main vna cum exitibus H. 16. E. 3. in Fits ti Liuere P. 29 as it appearethe in 16. E. 3. The same lawe is it yf of landes holden in capite there be a lease made for terme of lyfe the remainder ouer to estraunger 14. H. 4. f. 34 18. E. 3. f. 21. 24. E. 3. f. 27. tenaunt for terme of lyfe dyâ—th and this matter founde by office nowe if the kynge seise hee in the remainder shall haue an Ouster le main vna cum exitibus as it appearethe in 14. H. 4. 18 E. 3. 24. Edwarde the thirde Like law it is where .ij. hold iointly of the king the one dyethe and this matter founde by office and yet that notwithstandynge the kynge seises hee that suruiues shall haue an Ouster le mayn vna cum exitibus as it appearethe in the boke of Assises 44. 44. li. ass in Fits ti Liuere P. 11. T. 45. E. 3. f. 18. E. 3. and in the newe Natura breuium fo 2â—â— f. 257. For in all these cases where the Ouster le maine is vna cum exitibus the king ought not to haue seiseised and so sayethe Thorp 45. E. 3. The words of the statute be further Post mortem eorum qui de eo tenent VpoÌ„ this it is to bee sene at what time after the kynges tenants deathe this lyuerie shall be sued If the possession of the free holde immediatlye after the deathe of the kynges tenaunte discende vnto his heire it is to bee sued fourthwithe and yf but onelye a reuercion discende then it is not to be sued tyl after the death of the particular tenaunt as it may appeare in the newe Natura breuium f. 291. where the heire sued not lyuerie tyll after the deathe of the tenaunt by the curtesye tenaunt in dower and tenaunt for terme of lyfe But learne what the lawe shoulde haue beene if the kynges tenant hadde dyed seised of a reuersion whereupon rent had beene reserued hys heire of full age whether hee should haue theÌ„ sued liuerie fourthwith or els to haue taried tyll the deathe of the particuler tenaunt for in the seuenthe yeare of kyng Henrye the sixte Iune thinks he should tary or els it might followe the kynge should haue double lyuerie that is to say one for the rent an other for the lande M. 7. H. 6. f. 3 but Paston is in contrarye opinion and resembles it to a reuersion dependyng vpon an estate tayle with a rent reserued howebeit at this daye there is election geuen vnto the heire that is to say eyther to sue his liuerie immediatly after the deathe of his auÌ„cester in the lyfe of these particuler tenaunts or els to tarye vntill they die and if he sue his lyuerie in theire lyfe he paiethe for primer seisin but the moytie of one yeares profyte yf after theire deathe then he payethe the hole yeares profit howebeit if there be a rent reserued he pursueth his liuery in the lyfe of the particular tenaunt it seemes besides the halfe yeres profit of the value of the land he shal also paye the hole yeares profit of the rent reserued therfore learn what common experience teacheth vs in that case The woordes of the statut be Qui de eo tenent in capite By these words he must holde of the kinge in chiefe for yf he holde not of hym in chiefe the kynge can haue noe primer seisin And yet you shal see in the newe Natura breuium folio 296. that of lands in the citie of LoÌ„don holden of the king in burgage the king had primer seisin the heire thereof sued his liuery but that president semes to bee against the lawe for Markham saiethe in 7. E. 4. that in Neuels case it was founde that ones father died seised of certain lande that hee helde of the kyng in Burgage T. 7. E. 4. f. 9 and thereupon thexchetor did seise whiche seiser by thaduise of all the Iustices was discharged by a Supersedeas awarded to thexchetor for the wordes of bothe the foresayde statutes be verye plaine therein that is to saye that hee must holde of the kynge in capite but whether he holde of the kyng by knights seruice or by Socage in capite it makethe noe matter so that he holde in capite for the kinge in bothe cases shall haue primer seisin althoughe not wyth so large a prerogatiue in th one case as in the other For in the firste case where the tenure is knyghtes seruyce in capite the kynge shall haue the same prerogatiue when the heire is of full age at the deathe of his auÌ„cester as he should haue hadde yf hee hadde beene wythin age that is to saye primer seisin aswell in the landes holden of others as of hym selfe bee it that the landes holden of other bee holden by knyghtes seruice or in Socage But otherwyse yt ys where the tenure is but a tenure by Socage in capite for there the kynge shall haue noe primer seisin in landes holden of other namelye if theye be holden of other by knyghtes seruice as it appearethe plainlye by the statute of Magna charta capit 27. and in the newe Natura breuium fo 2â—â— nor yet anye primier seisin of landes holden of hymselfe in Socage in capite â–ª If the heyre at
if the laÌ„ds excede the yerely value of .xx. marks he must sue a specyal liuerie not a general therfore it makes no mater for the inquisitioÌ„ or office that the words of the statute wil beare it wel enough if there be but one office fouÌ„d But as to that it may be sayd that the meaning of the statute was not so for the kinge can neuer be fulli eÌ„formed of his title vnlesse ther be an office fouÌ„d in euery shere also by finding of seueral offices one record may be better for the kinge then an other whereof his grace may take auaÌ„tage for the best shal be takeÌ„ for the kinge Thus it appereth by statut how that of landes aboue the yereli value of vli inquisicioÌ„ must be made and an office found after the death of the kinges tenant be fore liuerie can be had and that must be by a writ of dieÌ„ clau sit extremum for that is the proper writ that is to be sued for that purpose if any sute be made within the yeare after the kinges tenants death or a special commission in the nature of the writ of diem clausit For vpon a general coÌ„missioÌ„ to enquire generally of all wards no perticular person can haue liuere And if he tarry till after the yere then he caÌ„not pursue any of these but for his remedie must sue a writ called Mandamus or a commission in nature of that writ and therupon to cause an office to be fouÌ„d and so to haue liuerie But if an office be once found by diem clausit and the heier dieth in the kinges ward his heir must sue Deuenerunt no Mandamus although it be after the yere of the death of him that dyed in ward and so is the rule in the register Sumetymes it happeneth that after deliuerie of the writ or commission and before office found theschetor dyeth or is remoued froÌ„ his office in which case then the proces that is awarded to his successor is a writ called Datur nobis intelligi but if office be fouÌ„d before his death or remouing which office is not returned then shall therbe a certiorari awarded to his executors to returne the same For it is a mater of record as sone as the iurrors haue put their seales vnto it notwtstanding it be not returned And note the thawardig of this writ of diem clausit or special coÌ„missioÌ„ is peremptorie to him the sueth for it For if he lese it or be taken froÌ„ him with force he gettes no moe writs or coÌ„missioÌ„s for the lands in that couÌ„tie and this appereth in the new Natura breuiuÌ„ fo 2â—â— Howbeit in 14. E. 4 it is touched by the waye that in such cases he should haue a new writ H. 14. E. 4. so 5. ideo quere But after office ones fouÌ„d by a dieÌ„ clausit or specyal commissioÌ„ as well the kinge partie therby are bouÌ„d as euery other straÌ„ger for somuch laÌ„des as are comprised within the office and neither the kinge ne that partie nor any other shal haue any moe writs or coÌ„missioÌ„s to enquire any further of these lands except it be in such cases as I shal hereafter recite for so the lawe shoulde neuer haue end but newe heires might be founde euery daye by office which were incoÌ„uenient and the king should not knowe to wheÌ„e to make liuerie this appereth .14 E. 4. and 2. et 4. 14. E. 4. f. 5 2. H. 7. f. 2. 4. 4. H. 7. f. 13. H. 7. But where after office found it is surmised for the kinge that his highnes hath a better title than was found for him by the first office whether the mater surmised may stand with the mater fouÌ„d by the first office or not yea although it be mere coÌ„trariaÌ„t or repugnaÌ„t it is not material But in such cases a new writ or coÌ„missioÌ„ shal be awarded As take the case to bee this By the first office it is found the kinges tenaunt in chiefe dyed seised his heir wtin age where in dede hee dyed without heir so that therby the lands ought to haue escheted to the kinge or that he was tenaÌ„t in taile dyed without issue of his body wherby the lands ought to haue reuerted vntoo the kinge in these cases the court shal awarde a new writ or coÌ„missioÌ„ for the kinge Like law is it where the daughter is fouÌ„d heir by office afterward the sonne is borne or where ther is but one daughter found heire by office where there ought to haue ben two fouÌ„d heires or if by the first office one is fouÌ„d heire of ful age which is not heir in dede but an other is heir which is within age In all these cases ther shal be a new writ or coÌ„missioÌ„ awarded Causa qua supra 14. E. 4. f. 5 4. H. 7. f. 13. as it may appere .14 E 4. et 4. H. 7. 12. R. 2 et 30. li. ass yea and a more stroÌ„ger case as it should appere in the new Natura breuium fo 2â—â— fo 2â—2 et f 295. that is to say where the kinge was to haue no benefit at all more then he had by the first office and yet a newe commission was awarded and therfore the case was there the second brother was founde heir by the first office of ful age now the eldest had a commission being also of full age to finde him heir and thervpon had his liuery So is it where 2. be fouÌ„d daughters and heirs to one maÌ„ of certain laÌ„ds where in dede parcel of the said land was geuen to one of the said 2. daughters in fraÌ„k mariage now she that claimed the frank mariage had a specyall coÌ„mission to enquire of the saÌ„e and yet by that second office the king had no benefit ideo quere For this Natura breuiuÌ„ semeth to impugne the bokes before rehersed And like as he may pray a newe writ or coÌ„mission in the cases aboue rehersed before liuerie had euen so may he do in the like cases after liuere had if the liuerie be a general liuerie therupoÌ„ as sone as the title is found the king shal rescise but not wtout a Scire facias because the statut made at Lincoln hath so prouided as I shall open more fully when I come too that place and that in all these aforesayd cases a new diem clausit may be as wel awarded as a new coÌ„mission as it appereth titulo Trauser in Fitz. pl ' 28. anno 29. li. Asss ¶ What thing shal be in the king without office or seasure what not and where by an office only without any seasure or other proces the kinge shal be in possessioÌ„ and where not and where he shal be in possession without an office but not before a seasure and how the kinge may be eÌ„titled by any other recorde as well as by an office and where a man may enter as well vpon the kynges
and entitle hym by the seconde office and trauerse the firste as hee nedes muste for thenterpleder muste nedes reste vppon the firste office and not vpon the second then as thissue is founde P. 36. E. 3. in Fits titulo Trauers P. 44. so shall hee or theye for whome it is founde haue lyuerye And this appearethe in the newe Natura breuium fo 294. 36. E. 3. 16. E. 4. folio 4. Howebeit a great doubt ryseth in our bookes vppon thys mater whether thenterpleder shal be fourthwithe after the seconde office founde or not vntill suche time as the heyre that is founde wythin age commethe to his age and as it appeareth by the sayde boke of 36. Ed. 3. in this case where one was first found of full age after the other within age thenterpleader was fourthwithe for it weare noe reason that hee that was ryghte heire and of full age shoulde bee delayed by the nonage of the other that is noe heire And a straunger shal bee receaued to trauerse the office not withstandinge the heire that is founde by the office that is trauersed bee withein age And then it is noe reason that the heire in this case be in worse condicion then a strauÌ„ger But take it by the first office one is found heire and wythin age and by the seconde office an other is found heire and of full age whether in this case they shal enterplede or not or whether thenterpleader shal be before thage of the other And surely it shoulde seeme by the groundes and rules declared before vpon the writ of Diem clausit extremum that the seconde office in this last case is voide because there ys noe better title founde for the king than was by the first then if it be voide there can be no enterpleder Howebeâ—yt in the newe Natura breuium fo 2â—0 it appeareth to the contrary hereof that they shal enterplede in this case and that the seconde office is not voyde for there the heyres founde by bothe offices weare of full age And yet that notwythstandynge theye enterpleaded And so is .5 T. 5. E. 4. f. â— Edwarde the fowerthe where it is sayde that if by one office the heire is founde within age and by an other office an other is founde heire and of ful age that in this case theye shall enterpleade but not before the childe come to his full age And Townesende iustice sayeth in .1 H. 7. that if by diuerse offices ij Liuery P. 17 be seuerally founde heires and within age nowe the kynge shall kepe the landes tyll theire full age and thenne theye shall enterpleade and yf theye dye before enterpleder their heires within age seueral Deuenerunt shal be awarded that is to say for euerie heire one by the same beyng fouÌ„d seuerally heyres to the auncester theye shall enterpleade at they re full age like as the auncester shoulde haue doone if they hadde lyued and yf the dyinge of anye of them weare wytheout issue and the other founde to bee his heire then is thenterpleder determined Thus may ye see how bokes vary in this matter and yet by the waye note this difference that is to saye where by the firste office the heire is founde within age and were of full age for by these bokes it shoulde seeme that if hee bee firste founde withein age notwithstandyng that by an other office an other is found heire and of full age yet hee shall not enterplede with the other tyll he bee of age contrarie it is yf the fyrst be found of full age and the nexte wythin age and the reason may be for that the kynge is first seysed of hym that is wythyn age with whom the lawe weyes more in presumption to bee heire than the other and thys tytle ys the beste tytle that the kynge hathe for it entytlethe hys highenesse to a greater benefite than dothe the seconde office and thys second was found vpon a coÌ„mission graunted more for the kings benefit thaÌ„ for the heries that should be fouÌ„d by the same and therefore it weare reason that hee that is first founde heire haue more fauoure if anye fauoure bee to bee shewed thanne hee that was last founde heire or at the least for the kynges benefit that the matter be respited til the childe bee of age Also the sayde Iustice Townesend sayde further that if one bee founde heire in one countie an other found heire in an other countie yet they shall enterplede whyche can not bee as me seemethe for once wee haue a generall grounde that a man can not sue a generall lyuerie by parcelles but firste he muste cause an office to be founde in euerye shere where he haue landes and when all the offices be returned then to haue his lyuerie and not beefore then this case where one is founde heire in one sheere and an other in an other sheere heare none of them bothe canne haue lyuerye beecause hee hathe noe office founde butte in one sheere and not in the other and thenne if there canne be noe liuerie there can be noe enterpleder wherfore it should seme in that case they caÌ„ not eÌ„terplede 2. â— 7. f. 2. Trauers 49. And here with agreeth the boke in .2 .8 Henry the seuenth So no enterpleder can bee but where there is an office thorough the whole found for euerye heire in euerye countie wheare the landes lye but it is not allwaye requisite that theare bee seuerall offices founde for sometimes vppon one office founde by it self alone there maye bee an enterpleder and that is wheare ij bee founde heires by one enqueste as two twynnes that is to say two children borne at a burden And it is to be noted that euerye enterpleder is to trye the priuitie of bloude onely that is to say which of these the enterplede is next heyre to hym that last dyed seysed and not to trye theire rightes in the landes And therfore if by one office one bee fouÌ„d heire of a general taile and by an other office an other is founde heire to the same lande as of estate in specyall taile theye shall not enterpleade as it appearethe in 21. H. 7. fo 3â— Allso they must be both found heires to him that last dyed and by whose death the king dyd seise for if one bee founde heire to hym that dyed seised and another is founde heire to the auÌ„cester that dyed seised nexte before the last dyinge seised in this case they shall not enterplede as it appearethe in H. 2. H. 6. f. 5. Also theye shall not enterplede but wher both heirs claime by one selfe title of landes holden of the kinge for yf the kings tenant dye seised of lands holden of other as well as of the kynge and one is founde heire to al the landes and by an other office an other is founde heire onely to the landes holden of other in this case theye shall not enterpleade as it appeareth in .12 E. 4.
trauerser loffice ou auterment mre son droit et illeoques maunde deuaunt le roye a faire final discussion sauns attender auter maundement This statute speakes bothe of trauerse and Monstrance de droit disiunctiuely whereby a man may gather that if Monstraunce de droit were not by thorder of the common law as it is saide 13. E. 4. f. 8. that it is yet were it geeuen by this estatute And no booke that beares date before this statut can I find that treates any thing of Monstraunce de droit Wherfore without preiudice to anye mans oppinion mine oppinion is that it is geuen onely by this statute but whether it bee so or not so I doe not greatly force Let vs see what it is in what cases it lieth If the kinge bee entitled by office or other matter of recorde that is trauersable Howbeit there is no cause of trauerse for that the office or recorde is true in this case anye manne that hath right to the possession of the freeholde of this lande whiche in shewinge of his right is able to confesse this office and auoid it shal bee receyued if hee bee putte out of hys possession or greeued thereby to come into the Chauncerie and shewe his saide right which beinge there proued to be true iudgement shal bee geeuen that the kinges handes be amoued from the possession of the saide landes with the meane issues and proftes to be restored vnto the party that sueth the said Monstraunce de droit As for an example it is founde by office that the kinges tenaunt by knightes seruice in chiefe dyed seised of certeine landes whiche are descended to his heir being within age where in dede in his life time I recouered this land against him and suing no execution suffred him to dye seised therof now vpon this office returned into the Chauncerie shall I come shewe my right that is to saye this recouere and auerre that this lande founde by office is the lande that I recouered or parcell thereof which being so proued and tried I shall haue an Ouster le maine Like law it is if the kings tenaunt disseised me of those landes and I made my continuall claime or that I had title to enter for condicion broken into the saide landes in the life of the kinges tenaunt and I entred and after was disseised by him But quere if I did not enter in his life whether now I may bee holpen by a Monstraunce de droit vppon the kinges possession And me thinkes not because I haue noe righte in that case till I enter for vntill that time the right continueth still in hym so that the kinge then hath a right ere I haue a right which ought too bee preferred and take place since it is but for a tyme before myne And for these cases see the booke in .3 H 7. fo 2. But if the king bee entitled by matter of worde not trauersable as if he be entytled by double matter of record in this case I can not haue my Monstraunce de droit no more than I can haue in the like case of Trauerse vnlesse my title be founde by one of the saide recordes As take the case to bee It is founde by office that one suche that holdeth of the kinge disseised mee and then committed a felonye vppon whome I entred after whiche entrie the saide tenaunt was attainted of the felonye in this case I shal haue the lande out of the kings hands by a Monstrance de droit causa qua supra And yet the kinges tytle is here by a record and not trauersable that is to saye thatteinder But what than My tytle is also founde by office and appeareth by matter of recorde M. 3. E. 4. 26 A. 4. H. 7. 6 whych beynge proued true doth clearelye auoide the kyngs possession and that is the reason I shall be receiued in thys case to a Monstraunce de droit as appeareth in .3 Edward 4. And therewith agreeth the booke 4. Henry 7. where kyng Richard the thirde was attainted of Treason by act of Parliament and found by office that he was seised of certeine land cometh one B. and saith that in the saide Parliament it was enacted that an atteinder of treason had against the father of the saide B. shoulde bee auoided and adnulled and hee restored to his landes and that these lands cōprised in the office were in the hands of the said king R. by attainder of his father aiudged that vpon this Monstraunce de droit the party should haue restituciō because his right appered by mater of record Like law is it wher it is found by office that such a one is attainted of felony is seised of such landes which are holden of the king nowe he that hath cause to sue his Monstraunce de droit can not be admitted therunto by reason of these two records Howbeeit if it bee so that there is noe suche attainder in deede then may the party that would sue a Monstraunce de droit saye that there is no suche recorde of attainder which beeinge founde true hee shal be receiued to his Monstraunce de droit as appeareth in the saide booke .4 H. 7. For nowe is there no recorde against him but onelye the office and notwithstandinge that by thoffice thattaindour is founde yet this fyndinge makes nothinge for the kinge if it bee vntrue For the iurie can neuer finde a matter of recorde and if they doe it is to little purpose for the recorde is euer triable by it selfe and if there bee suche a recorde it will appeare thoughe they fynde it not and if there bee none the finding of it is voide This may you see that a Monstrance de droit lyeth sometimes althoughe the kynge bee entytled by double matter of recorde if it so bee that the parties tytle appeare by matter of recorde or else it lyethe not M 14. E. 4. f. 1. 7 And yet Choke Littleton and Nedham helde oppinion in .14 E. 4. that if it bee founde before theschetour that one was tenant in taile of certeine landes holden of the kinge the remaynder to another in fee and that hee in the remainder is outlawed of felonye and that tenaunt in taile is dead without issue where in dede he beinge tenant in taile before the statute De donis condicionalibus after that hee hadde issue enfeffed one B. in this case the saide B. shall shewe this matter and that the vtlagarie was after the feffement made and so haue the landes out of the kinges handes by a Monstraunce de droit But it shoulde seeme their oppinion is againste the lawe and the bookes beefore rehersed vnlesse this feffement were founde by office Peticion .12 Trauers .7 because it appearethe that the kinge in this case is entytled by double matter of recorde And note that where the kinge is entitled but by office alone there the partye maye haue his Monstraunce de droit althoughe his title bee
firste chapter Also Britton an other old wryter which wrote hys booke in king Edwarde the first name sayeth des heirs nequedent si ils y eyent ascuns qui auncestre morust seisie de ascun terre tenu de nous en chief des aunciens demeanes de nostre corone volons auer les gardes de touts les terres dōt appent que deiuent descend a ceux heirs come lour heritage ouesque touts les blees en teles terres troues maintefoits de qui fees que les terres sont Britton here not only agreeth with the other but also geueth the king the corne growing vpon the groundes which the kinges tenant holdeth at the tyme of his death A. 21. H. 3. in Fitz. ti Prerogat ' P. 26. P. 25. Also in the great Abridgement of Fitzherbert you shal find in the time of king Henry the thirde written in this manner Nota quod lex angliae et consuetudo eiusdē est quod a quibuscunque aliquis feoffatus fuerit dum tamen a domino Rege aliquo tempore fcoffatus fuerit per tenementum qd ' tenetur per seruic̄ militare quod dn̄s rex habebit custod ' omniū terrar ' et tenemētorū tā de feoffamēto aliorū quā de feoffamento proprio Which text if a man will any thing wrest he may make the kinges prerogatiue more lyberall then is made or declared by this statute or any other the writters before remembred for it extendes to any landes holden of the king by knightes seruice whether they be holden of the king in capite or not but forasmuche as the saide other writers haue written so plainlye in this matter we will stand to them and extende the prerogatiue no further howbeit as I saide all those writters being so longe before the making of this statute doe plainly argue proue that this statute dothe but confirme and declare that that was the commen law before M 15. E 4.12 vnles we woulde doubt of the time of the making thereof as Littleton doth in 15. E. 4. but without doubt it was made in king Edward the secondes time and that plainlye appeareth by the woordes contayned in the third chapter of this prerogatiue which be these Et illa voluntas tempore Regis H. patris Regis E. estimari consueuit c. Which woordes were not written in kinge Edward the first daies for then the woords had bene patris nostri so that as I thinke it is not to bee doubted but that it was written in the time aboue limitted and expressed Then go wee to thexposicion of this first chapiter of prerogatiue The woords be dominus rex habebit custodiam omnium terrarum eorum qui de ipso tenent in capite per seruicium militare These woordes go generally to all the kings tenauntes that is to saye aswell to his tenantes for terme of lyfe as to his tenauntes of estate of enheritaunce if it so be that he that is in the reuercion haue the saide reuercion by discent and be heir vnto the said tenant for terme of life not forcing whether he haue the reuercion by discent from the said tenaunt for terme of life or else from any other ancestour as take the case to be this a man holdeth no landes of the kinge but onely as tenaunt by the curtesie and those landes are holden in chiefe by knightes seruice the saide tenaunt by the curtesie is seased in his demesne as of fee of landes holden of other lordes and dieth the landes holden of other discend vnto him in the reuertion whiche is indede nexte heire vnto the said tenant by the curtesie in this case the king shall not onely haue the wardship of the landes that were holden by the curtesie if the saide heire be wythin age but also the landes holden of other by vertue of thys prerogatiue And if the saide heire were of full age at the tyme of the deathe of the saide tenaunt by the curtesie the king shall haue primer season both of the one lande and of the other as it appeareth in the newe Natura breuiū fo 298. Like lawe is it if a woman be indowed of lands holden in capite and is seased in fee simple of landes holden of other and dieth seased and they discende vnto the heire whiche is in the reuercion in this case the kinge shal haue bothe these landes by vertue of this prerogatiue like as hee shall haue in the other case before 26. li. ass p. 57 and that maye you see in 26. li. ass for in bothe these cases they bee the kinges tenauntes and hold of him by knightes seruice in capite for tenaunt en dower in the kinges cas holdeth not of the heire but onelye of the kinge as it shal appeare more fully hereafter But if he in the reuercion bee not heire of the landes holden of other in the cases aboue remēbred otherwise it is But what if he in the reuercion haue the same reuercion by purchace and not by discent whether shall the king then haue his prerogatiue or not and as to that it shoulde seeme by the newe Natura breuium fo 259. that the kinge shall haue his prerogatiue in that case also for there the remainder was to the heire and to his wife and to the heires of theire two bodyes lawfully begotten and the husbande in the remainder dyd sue liuere howbeit against the law as me semeth ideo quere but if the case in the saide newe Natura breuium had been that landes holden by knightes seruice in capite had beene geuen to one for terme of his lyfe the remainder ouer in fee which parson in the remainder hath issue and dyeth and tenaunt for terme of lyfe holdeth landes of other Lordes and dyeth whiche discende to the issue that is in the remainder there it might be saide that the king shoulde haue prerogatiue in the whole like as he had in the cases before remembred of tenaunt by the curtesie and tenant in dower for like reason will serue in the one case that serueth in the other The woordes of the Statut be further de quibus ips◠tenētes fuerunt seisiti in dominico suo vt de feodo die quo obierunt de quocunque tenuerint These woordes rather apperteigne vntoo the landes holden of other then too the Landes holden of the Kinge in Capite as it shoulde appeare by the cases beefore remembred and then by these woordes the kinges tenaunt in his life tyme must himselfe bee seased either in possession or reuercion of those landes that hee holdeth of a common person that shall dyscende vnto his heire For if hee were neuer seased thereof but they discende vnto his heire from some other auncestor the king shall not haue his prerogatiue in them as appeareth in 15. 15. E. 4. f. 10. E. 4. but whether the kinges tenaunt were seased of them in his owne right or in another bodyes right it maketh no difference
as take the case he were seased of them but in right of his wife and hath issue and dyeth his issue is in the kinges warde for the lande that his father helde in Capite and afterwarde the wife dyeth the issue beynge still in warde the Kynge shall haue Prerogatiue in these landes of the wyfe also because the husband was seased of them in his demeane as of fee the daye of his deathe and so wythin the compasse of this statute And this case may you see in M. 13. H. 4. 6. 13. H. 4. and note that notwithstandinge this statute speaketh but of landes yet seruice are to bee taken by the equitie of the same as it is plainlye proued by the woordes of Diem clausit extremum which saieth Quantum terre tenet de nobis aut de aliis tam in dominico quam in seruicio So that if one holde of the kinges tenaunt by certeine seruices the King shal haue the seruices in warde for they be in nature and place of the lande that is holden and so shall it bee supposed And therefore when the kinge hath those seruices in warde and the tenaunt that holdeth by those seruices diâ—th his heire within age if the saide seruices were knightes seruice the Kinge shall haue warde by reason of wardshippe But yet by that noe prerogatiue in the other landes of the second warde whiche are holden of the other Lordes M. 6. R. 2. in Fitz. ti Gard P. 105. as it may appeare in 6. R. 2. For the kinges tenant was neuer seased of those other landes ne yet of the seruice that they were holden by and so without the compasse of this prerogatiue Like lawe it is where the Kinge hath the temporaltie of a bishop in his custody duringe the tyme the Sea is vacant and one that holdeth of those temporalties by knightes seruice dieth his heir wtin age the king shal haue the wardship of him the reason of it is because the king hath the wardship of the teÌ„poralties by reasoÌ„ wherof this wardship cometh whiche temporalties the kinge hath in warde by the order of the common lawe in lure corone For they bee barronies which can be holden of none other then of the kinge in capite and then by the common lawe I take it he were no better then a common person yet his highnes must haue the wardshippe of them that holde of those temporalties by knightes seruice if they falle duringe the time the saied temporalties be in his hands with such landes as they holde of those temporalties but not with such lands as theye holde of other and than must the heire thereof when he coÌ„meth to his ful age sue a liuere as shalmore plainly appeare when we come to the thirde chapiter of this prerogatiue The wordes of the statute before resited are in dominico suo this woorde demeane is not here taken to bee the verie possession or takyng of the profits for if the kinges tenauÌ„t dye seased but of a reuercion or of a remaynder in landes holden of a common person and duringe the minoritye of his sonne the particuler tenaunte dyethe the kynge this notwithstanding shall haue this lande in warde as he hath the rest as it may appeare 22. H. 6.15 E. 4. 46. E. â— M. 22. H. 6. f 20 M. 15. E. 4. f. 10. P. 46. E. 3. fo 10. So it is if the kinges tenaunt dye seased of an aduowson appendaunt to landes holden of a common person The woordes be further die quo obierunt and therefore if the kinges tenaunt dye seased of Landes holden of a commen persone and a straunger abbatethe yet the heire shal bee in warde and the kyng maye entre and so is it if the heire recouer by assise of nâ—ortdauncestre as it appeareth in the newe Natura breuium fol. 2â—â— T. 12. R. 2. But take the case to bee that the kinges tenaunte dye not seased but is disseised and dyethe whether in this case the kynge maye haue prerogatyue or not and it semethe that hee may for in all suche cases where the heire hath a right of entre the kynge may entre in name of the heire and holde it afterwarde in warde but yf the heire haue but a title of entre or ryghte of accion it seemethe to be otherwise howebeit looke for those maâ—â—ers in the sayde booke of 15. E. 4. 12. H. 7. 18. Edwardi tertii lib. ass P. 18. T. 12. H. 7. fo 17. Where it is adiudged that of landes holden of the kynge in chiefe the kynge as in ryghte of hys warde myghte sease by a Scire facias vppon a tytle of entre And note also that there is somewhat more to bee vnderstanden beare thenne is wrytten or expressed that is to saye that the saide Landes muste discende too the kynges warde for notwythestandynge the kynges tenaunt weare seased in hys demeane as of fee daye of hys deathe in landes holden of a commen persone yet if the same after hys deathe doe not discende to the kynges warde but to an other heire M. 12. E. 4. f. 18. the kynge shall not haue prerogatiue in them as it appearethe in 12. Ed. 4. The woordes of the statut bee also De quocunque tenuerunt Put case the kinges tenaunte is seased of certayne thynges whyche neyther are holden of the kynge nor yet of anye other whether shall the kyng haue them in warde or not as Merket warrâ—n A. 3. H. 7. f. 4 21. H. 6. f. 12. 46. E. 3. f. 10. 15. E. 4. f. 12. Rente Secke or aduowson en grosse and as it should appeare in 46. E. 3. 21. H. 6. the kynge cannot haue them in warde and yet in 15. Ed. 4. soome holde oppinion to the contrarye therefore inquere and learne what the lawe wil in these cases The woordes of the statute bee Per huiusmodi seruicium that is to saye by lyke seruice Bye these woordes the landes that are holden of other muste bee holden allso by knyghtes seruice or els the statute extendes not to them and yet the lawe is taken to the contrarye for yf the lands holden of other bee holden but in socage or free burgage the kynge shal haue prerogatiue in them as it appearethe in P. 24. E. 3. f. 13. T. 9. H. 3. ti Prerogatiue in fits â— 25. 24. E. 3. for this statute is but a confirmacion of the common lawe and therefore shall bee taken by equities and namelye when the lawe was so taken in 9. H. 3 whiche was longe time beefore the makyng of this statut Howebeit Bracton and Britton dothe extende this prerogatiue no further then to landes holden of other by knightes seruice therefore enquire for the cause and reason thereof Bracton li. primo de custod et releuiis Britton f. The woordes bee further Exceptis feodis archiepi cantuar ' c. This exception extendes not to the bodie wherefore the kynge shall holde that in warde
againste al men but it extendes to suche landes as are holden of these persones exempted by this statut Put case then that anie of these persones pourchace a seignorie since the tyme of the makynge of this statute shall the kynge haue hys prerogatiue in the landes holden of that seignorie or not And it is clere he shal notwithstandynge the aforesayde woordes of exception for theye doe not extende but to suche fees as we are theyrs at the time of the makynge of this statut Then further for asmuche as there bee diuers statutes concernynge wardeshyppe made aswell beefore as since the time of kynge Edwarde the seconde let vs see whether this prerogatiue wyl extende to those statutes or not and it seemethe it dothe for asmuche as this prerogatiue hathe beene euer from the beginninge as I haue sayde before And therefore if the kynges tenaunte beeinge seased of landes holden of a common parson makethe a feffement therof by collusion contrarie is the statute of Marlebridge to defraude the lord of the wardshippe and diethe the king hauing his heire in warde this matter founde by office shall sease vpon a Scire facias if the collusion be auerrable or wtout a Scire facias if the collusioÌ„ be apparaunt hold the same in warde by force of this prerogatiue that appeareth in 9. H. 4. So likewise wher the statute made in 4. H. 7. T. 9. H. 4. f. 5 prouidethe that the heire cesty que vse shall bee in warde Put case that the kynges tenaunte in capite before the statute in Anno. 27. H. 8. had made a ferfement of lands which he holdethe of a common perâ—one to the vse of hymselfe his heires and died before that statute in this case the kinge shoulde haue hadde his prerogatiue in the Landes so beynge put in feoffament to an vse euen as if his tenaunt had died seased thereof T. 12. H. 7. fo 17. as it appearethe 12. H 7. Than last of all let vs learne howe the lordes whose fees the kynge hathe in warde by his prerogatiue shal be demeaned and ordered for the rentes to be dewe for their seignories duringe the wardshippe whether they shall leese them as they do the landes 29. lib. ass in fits ti Petic p. 5. P. 24. E. 3 f. â—â— and the new natura breuium fo 179. And it appeareth in the booke of assises in 29. E. 3. that they had them by peticion at the Kynges hands therwith agreeth thoppinion of Hill ' in the .24 yere of kyng E. 3. Learne the reason of these bokes for it should seme to me the lawe to be otherwise because that al mesne seignories are suspended duringe the time the kyng hathe the tenauncye in warde if it bee not per case for the surplusage of a rent seruice whiche the mesne maye sue for to the kynge by waye of peticion and to saye that the heire shal be charged at his full age withe the sayde rentes it weare noe reason for then bothe his lande shoulde bee in warde and yet he charged to pay rent for the same wherefore it semeth that these bokes are against the law And with me agreeth Bracton in his first boke in the chapiter de custodia where he saieth Et cum tali ratione sint aliorum feoda in manu do mini regis pred' ratione alij capitales domini feod ' illorum ni hil poterint exigere de terris et tenÌ„tis illis nec in seruic ' nomi nat ' nec in auxiliis ad filiam maritandam vel filium primoge nit ' militem facieÌ„duÌ„ vel in sectis quaÌ„diu terre fuerunt in manu domini regis sed precipiet ' vic' qd ' hmÌ„odi distringere non permittat Howebeit Bracton in his said booke in the chapiter De releuijs saieth that the heire at his full age shall pay his reliefe to euerie of his lordes notwithstanding he hathe ben in warde quod nota for in al other cases he neuer paiethe reliefe that is to saye where he hathe bene in ward and hee makethe no other reason for it butte this s. quod hoc est speciale in rege propter suum priuilegium and so is the booke in the .24 M. 39. E. 3. in Fits ti Relief P. 1. Britton f. 163. yeare of kynge Edwarde the thyrde and the .39 yeare of the same kynge howebeit Brittons oppinion is that the heire shall paye noe reliefe to the other lordes after hee hathe beene in the kynges warde and commethe to his full age and I cannot fynde that the heire in anye suche case shoulde or doothe paye anye reliefe to the kynge that is to saye where hee hathe beene in warde therefore learn what experience teacheth vs in these cases The seconde chapiter ITem Rex habebit maritagium hered ' infra etateÌ„ in custodia sua existenÌ„ siue terre hered ' eorundem sint ab antiquo de corona siue de eschaetis quae sunt in manu domini Regis siue habuerit maritagium ratione custod ' terrarum dnÌ„orum eorundem hered ' nullo habito respectu ad prior ' feoffamenti licet de alijs tenuerunt Bracton li. 1. ti de herede sockman in cuius custodia esse debe at BrittoÌ„ f. 163 M. 24. E. 3. f. 24. H. 12. H. 4. in fits ti Gard. P. 81. All that is contayned in this Chapiter was the kynges prerogatiue by the order of the common lawe as it maye appeare in the bokes of Bracton and Britton in the places before noted and in a boke in the 24. yeare of kyng Edward the thyrde where it is sayde that no lorde can be more auncienter than the kynge for all was in hym and came from hym at the begynninge And therefore his highnesse muste haue prerogatiue in the bodye of whosoeuer the infaunte holdeth besides bee it that the landes are holden of the kynges highnes as of the auncientnes of his Corone or of hys newe escheates or come vnto hym as warde by reason of wardshippe or that his highnesse doe pourchace the seignorie of hym that is lorde by posterioritie or pourchaseth a manor holden of one of his honors whiche are of his newe eschetes of whiche maner thauncester of thinfaunt helde by posterioritie in all these cases the kynge shall bee preferred to the wardeshippe of the bodye and mariage beefore anye other lorde of whom the auncester also helde them daye of his death by priority of feffement that is to saye more auncient feoffement howe be it in these cases hys highenesse shall not haue wardeshippe in the landes holden of thother lordes beecause his tenaunte helde not of hym in châ—efe but onelye shall haue preferrement in the body and mariage beefore all other Then since the common lawe and statute dothe geue the kinge this prerogatiue let vs see whether his highnesse maye by grauntinge away his seignorie to an other graunt also with the same his prerogatiue to the grauntee that is to
19. E. 3. wher the said comittee came in 18. E. 3. fo 38. H. 8. E. 3. in Fitz ti Voucher P. 154. H. 19. E. 3. in Fitz Tit. Aid de Roy. 64. the heir being vouched in their ward showed how they held of the kinges lease praid in aid of the king had it wherat I do not a litle meruel because of this statute of Bigamis which was neuer spokeÌ„ of ne yet remembred in these bokes their iudgemeÌ„ts as it should seme beinge directlie against this statute Howbeit the maner of the lease doth not there certenlye apere that is to saie whether the wardship were granted Durante bene placito or Durante minore etate for that would make a differeÌ„ce as I haue said before Also the boke is 39. 39. E. 3. fo 10 E 3. where in a writ of Dovver brought against the comittee ther was aid graÌ„ted of the king but that semes to be out of the compas of the statute of Bigamis which spekes onelie of theÌ„ the haue it of the kinges graÌ„t so hath not the secoÌ„d Comittee therfore lerne what the law will in these cases But if the wardship be comitted to the wife wtout anie exception or forprise of her dower she by that is coÌ„cluded to claime ani dower during the said wardship as it may apere M. 2. H. 4 â–ª in the said new Natura breuium fo 2â—â— It is also said that where liuerie is made to the heier before the womaÌ„ sue for her dower in the chaÌ„cerie in the said liuerie there is no sauing made for her dower that theÌ„ she must pursue her writ of Dovver against the heir the reson that there made is beecause the king hath made liuerie generally wtout ani reseruacion of Dower to be assigned by his highnes whereunto I aunswer that wheÌ„ liuerie is sued before assignemeÌ„t of dower there is moste comoÌ„lie in the writs of liuerie a sauinge made for her dower if it so be that she were found the kings tenantes wife in thoffice and she beinge so founde if the heyr sue a general liuerye leuing out these wordes Salua dote or retenta dote c. it is a good cause for the kinge to resese the hole for the liuerie is missued in that case and that I learned of iustice Spilman which noted it so in .11 of H. 8. but if she be not found wife in the office the heire may sue his liuerie without anie such sauinge and to saie the the kinge by making such a liuerie should waiue the aduantage of his prerogatife in the dower that semes not to bee trew vnles the said waiuer were by expres wordes wherfore it semes the heir in that case after liuerie is not bound to yeld vnto her dower but her onlie remedie is to sue for the same to the king and that must be fyrst vpon an office as I think finding that she was his tenantes wife Ideo quere and learne whether she may haue dower in any case either in the chancerie or by writ of Dower at the comen lawe against the coÌ„mittee or the heire vnles she be found wife first by office as is aforesaid except it be in cases where the king will refuse this prerogatife And note that like as the kinge hath a prerogatife by this statute to yeld dower to the wife of his tenant so hath his highnes a prerogatife by the comoÌ„ law to withold dower from the wife of his tenant which no comon person hath As put case in a write of Dower the heir be vouched in the kinges warde and the tenaÌ„t showes for his lien the feffement with warranty of the husbande which is father to him that is vouched yet that notwithstaÌ„ding she shall recouer her dower against the tenant and not against the heir because that els the king should lose the wardship of the lands wher the womaÌ„ maie without her losse as well recouer her demaund against the tenaunt as she should against the kinge and yet if the king were a comon person in that case he should lose the wardship of so much as she demaundethe 26. E. 3. fol. 58 â–ª H. 8. E. 3. iÌ„ Fits ti Voucher P. 154. And this boke is .26 E. 3. wher it is said that the kinges comittee of the wardship shall not haue the prerogatife therew t agrees 8. E. 3. And note that like as the king hath prerogatife against the wife that bringeth the writ of Dovver so shall he haue prerogatife against the tenaunt in the saide writt of Dovver for notwithstanding that the tenant in the self saÌ„e case haue iudgemeÌ„ to recouer ouer in value against the heire which is in the kinges ward yet he shal haue no execucion of that recouerie til the land be sued out of the kinges handes Howbeit 27. E. 3. 27. E. 3. fo 87 is contrarie to the said boke of 26. E. 3. ideo quere And learne and enquire whether a womaÌ„ being thus endowed at the haÌ„ds of the feffee of her husband of such lands as he died not sesed of and wherof the king at that time can haue no wardship whether she maye marie or not without the kings license it semes she can not for anie wordes comprised within this statute And it apereth in the boke of Assises 26. E. 3. 26. li. Ass P. 57 that wher a woman was endowed by gardein in chiualrye and afterwards the garden committed treson wherbie the seignorie was forfet to the kinge that after this forfeiture she should hold of the kinge and not of the heir which was in the reuersion in which case then she can not mary without licence as me thinketh TheÌ„ further it is to be sene to what lands the statute dothe extend vnto and to what not It extendes to landes holden in capite wherof any woman claymeth dower as maie apere by the wordes of the saÌ„e statute and not to anie other lands for if the king haue in his custodie byshops temporalties during the tyme the Sea is vacant and one that holdeth of those temporalties by knightes seruice dieth his heir being within age whereby the kinge hath the wardship of his heir and eÌ„doweth his wife in this case she shall make no othe but maie marie without liceÌ„se Like lawe is it wher she is endowed of lands that are holdeÌ„ of him that is the kings highnes ward by reason of a tenure in Capite for in both these cases the land wherof dower is demaunded are not holdeÌ„ of the kinge in cheefe and this doth apere in the newe Natura breuium fo 264. and yet in both those cases she is endowed in the chauncerie but what is that to the purpose for so shall the heire in those cases sue liuerie of those lands and yet thei be neuer the more for the holden in chief but onely vsed for a solempnity becaus thei were in the kings hands once by office which is matter of
them selues where thei list so that they hold nothing of the king And fo 168. he saieth that the king shall haue the mariage of all the heires females where thei hold of the king of what age so euer they be as ofteÌ„ as thei shal be to marie so that they can not marrie wtout the kinges licence Thus is the last clause of this chapter expressely proued by Britton that the comon law did stil remain as it was for the mariage of the heires females in the kinges case and not altered or abreged by the said estatute of west primer therfore was the statut in the 39. yere of king H. 6. the last chapter made in this wise Item de auisameÌ„to assensu et aucthoritate pred ordinatuÌ„ est stabilituÌ„ qd mulieres existentes etatis 14. annoruÌ„ tempore mortis antecessoruÌ„ suoruÌ„ absque questione seu difficultate habeant liberacioneÌ„ terraruÌ„ et tenÌ„torum suorum sibi descensorum quia sic lex istius terrae vult quod tunc ipsi haberent How beit this statute prouides not wher thei be within the age of .14 yeres at the deth of their auncester ideo quere For as our late bokes go sins Brittons time the king hath lost his prerogatife vpon what occasion I know not but I woulde gladlie lerne 35. H. 6. 46. for Fortescue saies 35. H. 6. that when the heir female sues her liuerie she takes no oth that she shall not marie as the kinges widow doeth and therfore saieth he it should seme she should make no fyne yf she marie without liceÌ„se Howbeit Littelton saies that if the heir female be of the age of 15. yeres at the deth of her aÌ„cestor and marie her self without license that she shall make a fine for it amouÌ„teth to an alienacioÌ„ For after issue had the husband is become the kinges tenaÌ„t and he solie shall doe homage in his owne name And yet afterwardes in the 15. yere of E. 4. the same Littelton saies that the latter clause of the same statute is void for the doughter which is inward mariynge her self to an other wtout licence shal not make a fine to the king Thus by the argumeÌ„t of the said boke of .35 H. 6. it aperes that thei take the king to be bound by the said statut of w 1. and make him no better then a comon person wherat I haue no litle meruel sins he is not named in the said statute For in the said boke it is agreed by the court that if the kâ—ng after the age of 14. yeares and before 16. do marie the heir female she shal haue liuerie foorthwith vpoÌ„ the mariage H. 35. H. 6. in Fitz ti Gard. P. 71. althoughe she then bee not of the age of xvi yeares because that she was of full age before as it is there said that is to saie as sone as she was 14. And that ii yeres ouer is but only geuen for the mariage which when it is once had and the .14 yeres past the kinge or lord lese theire interest And so it was granted that if she were maried before the age of .14 and after her husbaÌ„d dies before the said age when she comes to the said age of .14 she shal haue liuery And there it was also said that these ii yeres were geuen to the lord to tender her mariage in for the tender before was void because it was wtin the age of 14. yeres But note that if the heire female being vnder the age of 14. yeres falleth in to the kinges handes as ward because of certen lands that her father held of the king in cheefe by reson therof the king hath also the lands inward which are holden of other in socage in this case when she comes to the age of 14. yeres and is vnmaried she shall not haue liuery of these landes holden in socage and yet by reson of them the king hath not the mariage of her But what then she cannot sue her liuerie by parcels and that is the cause that the hole land shal tary in the kings hands til a hole liuerie mai be sued of them all and this aperes in the newe Natura breuium fo 256. And last of all note that this latter clause extends not to women that clayme by purchase but onlie by disceÌ„t And therfore it aperes .15 E. 3. 15. E. 3. iÌ„ Fitz ti Liuere P. 31. that where it was found vpoÌ„ the Diem clausit that the wife was iointly infeffed with her husbaÌ„d she had an ouster le main without findinge any suertie of her mariage And note also that by the comon law yf one will mary the kings nief 33. li. ass in Fitz ti Trauers P. 36. that is to saie his bondwomaÌ„ wtout license he shal paie a fine vnto the king as aperes in 33. E. 3. li. Assisarum The fifth chapiter ET si vna hereditas quae de Rege tenetur in capite desceÌ„dat pluribus participibus tunc omnes illi heredes facient homagium Regi et illa hereditas quae de Rege tenetur participabitur inter heredes illos ita quod quil'z eorum extunc partem suam tenebit de Rege This statute is somwhat declared by a statute longe time made before that is to saye in the 14. yere of king H. the .3 called statutum Hibernie de coheredibus which for the better declaracion of this prerogatiue I haue also here noted HeÌ„ricus dei gratia rex Anglie dominê° Hiberniae et dux Aquitaniae et NormannÌ„ comes Andigauie dilecto et fideli suo Gerardo filio Maurisci Iusticiar ' Hibernie saluteÌ„ Cum milites de partibus Hiberniae nuper ad nos accedentes nobis ostenderunt quod cum hereditas deuoluta sit inter sorores in terra nostra Hibernie Iustic ' nostri in eisdem partibus itinerant ' incerti sunt vtrum post natae sorores tenere debeant de primogenita sorore et ei facere homagiuÌ„ an non Et quia predicti milites petieruÌ„t certiorari qualiter iÌ„ regno nostro ' Anglie iÌ„ casu consimili hactenus vsitatum fuit sic ad instantiam eorundeÌ„ vobis significamus quod in regno nostro Anglie talis est lex et consuetudo in hoc casu quod si quis tenuerit de nobis in capite et habuerit filias heredes ipso patre defuncto aÌ„tecessores nostri habueruÌ„t et nos semper habuimus et cepimus homagium de omnibus huiusmodi filiabus et singule earum tenerent de nobis in capite in hoc casu Et si infra etatem fuerint nos habebimus custodiam earum et maritagium singularum Si autem de alio domino tenuerint et ipsae sorores infra etatem fuerint earum dominus habeat custodiam et maritagium singularum et primogenita tamen faciet homagium domino pro se et omnibus sororibus suis et alie sorores cum ad etatem peruenerint
whether they be of full age at the death of their auncestour or within age or some of them of ful age some of them within age none of them that be of full age shal haue any liuerie but with a particion that for the kinges benefite because that vpoÌ„ the particion euery one of theÌ„ shal haue for his portioÌ„ some parte of the landes that are holden of the kinge in Capite For if some should haue for their porcion onlye the landes holden of â—ther then the king shoulde lose his prerogatiue in those landes hereafter for euer because that they that haue them when they shal dye hold nothing of the kinge in capite and so might the king be deminished of his auncient rights of the Crowne which were against all naturall equitie Wherefore the lawe was euer they should all holde of the king And that appeareth by the writs of Liuerie in which writes there is a prouiso that euery one of them shall haue in her purparte parcell of the landes that are holden of the king in Capite as you may see in the new Natura breuium fo 2â—â— And this liuery must be sued with a particion or else it is missued H. 16. E. 3. in Fitz. t. Liueri P. 29. it cannot be sued forth vntill such time as all the writes of Diem clausit extremuÌ„ are come into the ChauÌ„cerie returned as appeareth 16. E. 3. And then if all the coperceners be found of full age then a write shall goe out of the Chauncery to the Sherife to extende the landes after the extent retorned a write shal goe to therchetour to make particion and liuerie according to thextent therof made as appeareth in the newe Natura breuium fo 262. But if one of the coperceners be within age and in the kinges warde then the particion may be made in the Chauncery then to haue a write of Liuerie to thexchetour of her parte or else it may be wholly done in the Countrey by thexchetour like as they had bene bothe of full age that is to say shee of full age being there present in her owne person and she that is within age onlye by Prochein amye as it appeareth in the saide newe Natura breuium fo 26â— Whiche write shal bee retourned with the particion and afterwardes enrolled in the Chauncerie And it shoulde seeme that if after the write of extent retourned she that is of full age do praye a write of liuerie with a particion that she shall then neuer after haue a reextent if so be that before it were so highlye extended Like lawe is it if the particion be not egal and she notwithstanding will accept it But in all those cases she that was within age if she haue to litle for her porcion she may haue a write of participatione facienda against her other copercener or a Scire facias in the Chauncerie vppon the recorde of Particion that is there to shew why newe particion or extent shall not be made By which write if they bee warned and come not or come and saye nothing the land shal be receiued into the kinges hands and a newe extent made in the presence of the parties whiche if it be not extended as it shoulde be they may pray a reextent before particion made for after particion the prayer cometh to late And this may ye see in the newe Natura breuium fo 65. and in .2 E. 3. et 2. E. 3. in Fitz. ti LiuÌ„e P. 8. 13. E. 1. eodem ti p. 6. 13 E. 1. but learne whether she may defete the particion by entre wtout suyng any such writes or no because the other are in by matter of record the is to say by liuerie wherunto she is also after a maner party So is it not like the case of a straÌ„ger for a straunger that hath eigne title may enter vppon them after Liuerie notwithstandinge they haue the possession by matter of record á 7. E. 3. f. 36. And it is said by Hill 17. E. 3. that aduowson assigned in Purpartie may be defeated by puttinge debate vppon the presentment without any other Proces And note that sometymes the king is to take a detriment by the liuere with the particion As take the case to be where some of them be within age and in the kinges warde and some of full age and theyr auncestour dyeth seased not only of Landes holden in chiefe but also of Landes holden of other Lordes they of full age haue liuerie with a particion now the kinge leeses the wardwip of as much of the lands that are holden of other as they haue Liuerie of and yet if no particion had bene made the kinge shoulde haue had the Wardshippe of the whole til the heire had come of full age as Mombray affirmeth M. 21. E. 3. 32 21. E. 3. And note also that of thinges entier the kinge shall haue by nonage of one of them the whole and the other that bee of full age gett no parte of it ne yet liuerie therof ne particion as take the case to be this A maner holden of the king in chiefe wherunto aduouson is appendaunt discend vnto three coparceners and one of them is within age and in the Kinges warde the other two that be of full age maye sue theire liuerie for the lande with a particion but not for the aduowson For that shall whollye remaine to the kynge duringe the minoritie of her that is in warde 38. H. 6. f. 10. M. 21. E. 3 fo 34. And this appeareth 38. H. 6. et 21. E. â— And note that if vppon particion made thexchetour retourneth that some haue theire partes deliuered them and some not because they sued not to him for it they that did not sue maye at all tymes in the Chauncerie sue out a writte vntoo Thexchetour to haue the same deliuered vnto them in whiche write there shal bee enclosed a transcripte of the Particion as it appeareth in the saide newe Natura breuiuÌ„ fol. 2â—â— and there it appeereth also fol. 293. that liuerye with a particion was sued for landes holden in Burgage but by likelyhode it was no commen burgage for as it appeareth the heire did his homage for the saide landes And note also that if the Coparcener of full age take the parte of her sister whiche is in the kinges Warde by lease or graunt of the kinge Durante minore etate by this she suspendes the particion For notwithstanding she haue the one moitie deliuered her with the profites of the other moitie yet when her sister commeth to full age both they shal sue a newe lyuerie with a particion as appeareth in the saide newe Natura breuium fol. 2â—2 The sixth chapiter SImulier ante mortem antecessoris sui qui de rege tenet in capite ante annos nubiles maritat ' fuerit tunc rex habebit custodiam corporis illius mulieris vsque ad etatem
ne voilomus nous my de ceux qui deueignount sotes per ascun maladye Vpon these words of Britton I note .iij. things one is that the king shal not haue the custodie during theire liefes but duringe theire Ideocy the second notwithstanding the lande is in the kings handes yet the other lorde shall haue theire seignories which is by way of peticion as I take it and the thirde is that the other lorde shall not haue the wardshippe of the heire nor of his landes but onely the kynge whiche thiâ—de thingê by this statute of prerogatiue are not so plainelye set fourthe and also by this statute it appeares that the kynge shall haue the custodye of suche Ideottes durynge they re lyues for the woordes bee Et post mortem eorum reddat eam rectis heredibus and not beefore The manner howe the kynge shall come to his prerogatiue appeares by a booke case .16 Edwarde the thyrde 16. E. 3. in Fits ti Liuery P. 30. where Sharde sayes that when the kyng is enfourmed that there is suche an Ideotte hys highnes shall sende for hym and cause hym to bee broughte beefore hys chauncelloure or some other whom hee shall appoynte and yf by examinacion hee bee founde an Ideot yet his hyghenesse oughte not to sease his landes vntill suche tyme as hee bee founde an Ideot by office And in the newe Natura breuium folio 232. it appeares that the kinge appointes all this matter to theschetour or sherife bothe to examine and enquire in whiche sayde Natura breuium folio 229. it appears that this office when it is founde shal haue relacion a natiuitate to auoide al meane actes donne by the Ideot that is to saye his feffements or release but learne and enquire whether suche feffees shall bee put out by thoffice without anye Scire facias to bee awarded againste them M. 18. E 3. in Fits ti 30. Scire facias P. 10. et 106. In 18 .32 E. 3. a Scire facias was awarded in that case and learne allso whether the office shall haue relacion for the profites from the tyme of hys natiuitie or onelye from the findinge of thoffice Then to the exposicion the woordes bee Rex habebit custodiam terrarum fatuorum naturalium By these woordes it apperethe that he must bee a fole natural that is to saye a foole a natiuitate â–ª for yf he were once wyse and beecame a fole by chaÌ„ce or misfortun M. 18. E. 3. Fits ti Scire facias P. 10. the king shal not haue the custody of him and so it is agreed in .18 E. 3. And also in the newe Natura breuium fol. 2â—3 and the manner of the tryall of hym to bee a foole naturall appeares in the sayde Natura breuium folio 233. that is is to saye yf hee cannot tell to tweÌ„tye pence or tel his age or who was his father and mother or such like thinges whereby yt may appeare hee hathe no kynd of vnderstandinge in that that is eyther for hys profyte or dammage But if hee bee learned or apte to learne thenne is hee no Ideot as maister Fitsherbert there thinks M. 31. E. 3. ti sauer de defaulte P. 37. and Grene sayethe in .31 Edwarde the thirde That yf hee bee able to begette eyther sonne or doughter he is no foole naturall The woordes of the statute bee further Capiendo omnes exitus eorundem sine vasto et destruccione et inueniet eis necessaria sua By these woordes it appeareth that the kynge maye take the profetes to hys owne vse fyndynge them theire necessaries And therefore in the booke beefore of Tricesimo primo of Edwarde the thyrde the kynge dyd not lette the lande vnto one of the cosyns of the Ideot yeeldynge a rente butte these woordes findynge them necessaryes is not onelye mente to the Ideottes themselues but allso to all them that hange vpon them as they re wyfe chyldren and familye And allso by these woordes sine vasto destruccione M. 3. E. 2. in Fits ti Gard. P. 5. it appearethe the kynge is bounde to reparacions of theire landes and tenementes The woordes bee allso De cuiuscunque feodo terre ille fuerint By those woordes it shoulde seeme the kynge shoulde be preferred in thys tytle of Ideocye beefore anye other lords whyche myghte clayme the Ideot as hys warde howebeit learne what other menne thynke therein Et post mortem eorum reddat eam rectis heredibus Bye these woordes it shoulde appeare that the kynge shoulde saue the custodye durynge the lyfe of the Ideof and that than an Ouster le mayne in nature of a lyuerye shall bee suyd of the same oute of the kynges handes butte whether yt shall bee made wythe the yssues and profytes from the tyme of the Ideottes deathe or onelye butte from the time of the tender of the Oustere le mayne learne butte yf the landes that the kynge hadde so in custodye bee holden of hym in capite thenne notwythestandyng these wordes of the statute yet the kynge shall haue wardeshyppe prymer seisin and all other prerogatiues as yf hys tenaunte in chiefe hadde dyed seased thereof beynge noe Ideot as it maye appeere in the newe Natura breuium fol. 2â—6 And there it appeares folio 2â—2 allso that allthoughe the Ideot helde noe landes of the kyng yet a Diem clausit extremum shall bee awarded after hys deathe to enquire what landes hee dyed seased of of whom they are holden c. And it is to be noted that yf one be fouÌ„d Ideot by office before the king seaseth the lands the Ideot dies yet the kynge shall sease beecause of these woordes in the statute â— post mortem eorum reddat eam rectis heredibus whych his grace cannot do but vpon a seisure and thys appeares 18. M. 18. E. 3. in Fits ti Scire facias P. 10. Edwarde the thirde And note allso that if ther descende to an Ideot no possession in landes butte onelye a ryghte bee it righte of entre or title of entre or ryghte of accion the kynge shall not enter and haue the custodie of the same 1. H. 7. 15. as appeares in 1. Henrye the seuenth and yet if hys tenaunt of landes holden of hym by knyghtes seruice bee disseised and dyethe his heire within age the kynge shall enter and holde the same in warde and therfore learn what is the reason that shoulde make a difference in these cases The woordes be further Ita quod nullatenus per eosdem fatuos alienentur nec quod eorum heredes exheredentur Bye these woordes it appeareth the landes cannot bee aliened by the Ideot nor the heires disheryted and therefore if the Ideot make a feffement or release of his landes and that founde by office the kynge shall auoyde it as I haue beefore noted and so likewyse his heires after his deathe by force of these woordes of the statute And yet it appeares .31 E. 3. that a recouerie by
possession as any other By a statute made the .33 yere of the late kinge of famous memorie H. 8. the 20. chapter it is among other things prouided that if any person or persons shal be attainted of hye treson by the course of the comon lawes or statutes of this realme that in euery such case euery suche attainder by the cōmon law shal be of as good strength value force and effect as if it had ben done by authorite of parliament that the kinges maiestye his heires and successors shall haue as much benefit auātage by such attainder as well of vses rights entres cōdicions as possessions reuercions remainders and all other things as if it had ben done and declared by autoritie of parliamēt and shal be demed and a iudged in actuall and reall possessiō of the lands tenemēts hereditamēts vses goods cattals all other things of the offēdors so attaīted which his highnes ought lawfulli to haue and which they so being attainted ought or might lawfulli lose and forfait if the attainder had ben done by authorite of parliamēt without any office or inquisicion to be founde of the same any law statut or vse of the realme to the cōtrarye therof mani wise notwtstādīg This statut maks it clere without questiō that in cases of hye treson the lāds of him that is attainted are in the kinge biand by without any office But for other attainder it remaines as it was at the comō Law and therfore lerne if one which holdeth of the king be attainted of petit treson or felonie whether in this case by thatainder his lands be in the king without office and me semeth by attaīder and death together they should be in the kinge in law howbeit not in dede vntill suche time his highnes seise themby his officer or that an office bee therof foūd for by thattainder the lands are forfaited to the kinge by mater of record and then when the partie dyeth either the frehold must be in suspence or els aiudged in the king in lawe for he that was seised hath corrupted his blood and is dead without heir and therfore his highnes is beecome owner thereof in lawe and a possession in lawe vested in him of the same landes which his highnes at his will and pleasure may make a possessiō in dede as sōe as he wil take vpon him knowledge of the sayd landes and sease them by his officer And therfore the booke is agred 20. E. 4. 20. E. 4. so 10 that if he that is attaynted be seised of auowsōs appendaūt as sōe as the church becometh voide the king may presēt wtout any office which proues that the kinge by thattainder was patron before any office found or els how could his highnes present and I see no differēce betwene lāds auousōs in this case for auouson is not so transitorie toward the kinge but that he mai take the presentment therof at all times whē he will quia nullum tēpus ei occurrit Howbeit lerne what the law will in this case for many mē are of the contrarie opinion And see the boke .4 E. 4. cōcernīg this mater And so note what is sayd of a possession in law 4. E. 4. 21. for as I take it there may be a possession in law in the kinge as well as a possessiō in dede which possession in law is euer without office or any other mater of record as whē the possessiō is cast vpō his highnes by a discēt reuerter remaīder or escheit or in title of his seignorie or prerogatiue as for wardship primer seisī or for the custodie of the tēporalties of a bishop during the time that the see is vacant in all these cases without any office or other mater of record here is a possession in law vested in the kings highnes that is to say for that that doth descēd reuert remain or eschet the freholde is cast vpon him in lawe as it should be vpon a comon person in the like case or els the frehold should be in suspence which may not be of the rest the possession in law of a cattell is in his highnes in right of his seignorie which his highnes at his will and pleasure may make a possession in dede by entre or seasure but not to make it a possession in dede by his graunt because there is a statute made in the 18. yeare of H. 6. ca. 6. to the let therof which prouideth that all letters patents made of lāds tenements before office foūd and returned or within one month after but onely too him that tendethe his trauerse shal bee voyde This statute extdes onely to landes and tenementes therfore of the bodie of his warde his highnes may make a graunt notwithstandinge this statute as me semeth for that is neither lād ne tenemēt also notwithstādinge that this statute doth restraine the graunting of the lāds tenemēts yet the seisin therof remaines and is in the kinge as it was by order of the comon lawe which is as I sayd before in his highnes in lawe although not in dede vntil such time as he hath made a seasyn or an entree by his eschetour or a graunt therof which wayethe both to a seasure and a graunt in such cases where the graunte maye bee goode and not restrained by statute or vntill such time an office therof be found For an office that entitleth the kinge to the possession is sufficient by it selfe without any seiser or entre of the eschetour to make a possession in deede in the kinge if it be so that the possession were vacant when the office was founde But if the possession were not vacāt but an other thā he in whose right the kinge seiseth was tenant therof at the time of the findinge of the office then must the kinge entre or sese by his officer before the possession in deede shal bee iudged in him yea and if his highnes seise not by the space of a yeare and a daye after the findinge of the office then maye be not seise without a Scire facias to bee pursued agaīst him that is tenāt therof 9. H. 7. f. 2. 7 49. E. 3. f. 22. 20. E. 4. f. 10. Estopel 255. Trauers 50. 32. Ass P. 32. 29. Ass P. 30. 21. H. 7 f. 7. P. 21. E. 4 f. 1 Gard. P. 105 And of those maters you may see bokes 9 H. 7. 49. E. 3. 20. et 21. E. 4. 4. E. 2. 10. H. 4. 21. H. 7. 29. et 32. li. ass But heruppon is there a distinction to be made whether that that the king is ētitled vnto by office be a thinge manuell and wherof profit maye bee taken forthwith after the findinge of the office or not For if it bee such a thinge as is not manuel and wherof there is no profite too bee taken forthwith vntill such time it falleth in that case althoughe the king be in possession of the right of
Trauers 47. H. 5. that these statutes that geeue trauerse are only to be vnderstand where the king is entitled to the land but for a time as for wardship alienacioÌ„ wtout liceÌ„s and suche like But if his highnes bee entitled to the fee simple or the freehold there he that is put out by the office shal not haue his trauerse but is put to his peticion Tamen quere for though the first statut be this as Bab. hath sayd yet the second is not but is general therfore may bee extended to al offices what mater soeuer they conteyn Traâ—ers 37. as appereth H. 19 R. 2. wher it was fouÌ„d that one had encroched vpon the kyngs demeines which office in dede was false for that that the thing supposed to be encroched was parcel of his manor that was so preseÌ„ted no part of the kings demesnes in this case the partie being put out of that parcel of grounde by theschetor was receiued to trauerse the office yet thoffice entitled the king to the fee simple Also those statutes seeme not to geue trauerse but to him that is put out of possession by the office But the statut of .8 H. 6. ca. 16. alowethe any trauerse ê“fred by him that feeleth himselfe greued by any such enquest although he be not put out of possession by theschetor And the statut semes all so to allow trauers of an office taken aswell before coÌ„missioners as before the eschetor Howbeit the statut geueth no trauers but onely maketh thereof a rehersal These statuts that geue the trauerse seme to offre it generally to any man that wil desire it or that doth put challenge or claime to the lands wherof he is put out by any office Howbeit the expositioÌ„ hath ben otherwise that is to say that his challenge or claime must be such as the law will admyt allow for euery man can not trauerse that would or that maketh his challenge or claime for these statutes are intended wher the king is entitled by office onely for if his highnes be entitled by an other recorde beside the office and entitled as it were by a double mater of record the partye shal neuer haue his trauerse As take the case to be this a man is attainted of treson by act of parlement or otherwise by verdit and afterwarde it is found by office that the said person attainted was seised day of the treason coÌ„mitted of certaine lands which in dede were neuer his laÌ„ds but mine in thys case if I be put out of my laÌ„d by this office I can not trauers it Causa qua supra and yet I am a straunger to this record 46. E. 3. f. 17. 10. H. 6. f. 15. 4. E. 4. f. 27. as appereth in 46. E 3. 10. H. 6. 4. E. 4. But if therbe noe such recorde of attainder I shal be receiued well ynough to trauers the office aleginge first to enure mee to a trauerse that there is no such recorde of attainder as appeareth in .4 H. 7. Allso he that is founde heire by office shal not trauerse the same office that so findeth hym heire yf that part of thoffice that concernes the tenure in chiefe bee true 4. H. 7. f. 6. althoughe the reste of the office bee false and therefore if the kynges tenaunt dye seised his heire being of full age by a false office the heire is founde within age in this case hee can not trauerse thys office as appearethe T. 5. E. 4. 5. E. 4. f. 4. et 5. And the reason of it is beccause the heire can not salsifie thoffice that hee himselfe is to affyrme by his liuerie whenne hee shall sue it For thoughe hee woulde cause an other office to bee found according to the trouthe of the mater yet it were not to the purpose to help him for the best office shal be takeÌ„ euermore for the king that is to say that that geues his highnesse most auantage the heire driuen to sue his liuerie vpoÌ„ that office onely for seing the king is bound by an office as wel as is the heire it is reason if any be better for him thaÌ„ other that he be bound to that onelie not to the other the lawe presumes the one office to be as true as the other vntil such time a tryall thereof be made which triall cannot be by the heire for hee is bounden as I sayde beefore by the office that is found without any further choise hauing no prerogatiue in such mater and if he shoulde be receaued to his trauerse in this case then vpon the trauerse founde for him he should haue the lands out of the kings hands by an Ouster le mayn without any liuerie suing as lands that the king ought to haue seised which were incoÌ„uenieÌ„t For euery way the king ought to haue seised those lands against any that claimeth to be heire vntil such time as liuere be sued therof Like law it is where the kings tenant dieth seised of land in diuers couÌ„ties his heire being of full age in one couÌ„tie the same heir is founden wtin age in an other countie he is foundeÌ„ of ful age in this case the heire shal not trauerse thoffice that fouÌ„d him within age Causa qua supra for then for the landes in one couÌ„tie he should haue theÌ„ out of the kings hands wtoute any office or liuery suing Trauers 39. And this case appereth in .32 H. 6. But if an office find that my father held his lands of the king in chiefe by knights seruice wherin dede he held not of him in chief in this case I shal be receiued to trauerse this office For if I should sue my liuerie vpon the sone I should be coÌ„cluded euermore after to say but that the lands were holdeÌ„ in chief of the king for the cause I shal be receaued to my trauerse as euery strauÌ„ger shal bee in the like case for if my trauerse be true theÌ„ caÌ„ the king haue no cause to seise those laÌ„ds therfore not like the cases before remeÌ„bred as appereth M. 1 H. 7. Liuery P 10 The words of these statuts be that he whose laÌ„ds be seised shal trauerse or he that putteth challeng or claime to the laÌ„d so seised These words be not so genÌ„aly vnderstaÌ„d as they be spoken for most men vnderstande them that hee will challenge or claime but a terme of yeares onely shal not bee receiued to his trauerse where the kinge is entitled to the freeholde by thoffice as wher it is founde that the kings tenant is seised of certane landes and is dead without heire wherby the laÌ„des ought to escheate to the kynge cometh one and sayethe that hee is tenaunt for terme of yeares of these lands of the demise of a straunger without that that he that is supposed to bee the kinges tenaunt was euer seysed of these landes this trauerse lyeth not in his mouth for he
that hath but a chatell shall not be receiued in anye case to falsifie the record that geueth any man interest in the freehold although he be a straunger to that record Contrarie lawe is it of him that hathe a freeholde or inheritaunce in the lande for they shall trauerse the recorde in suche case Lyke lawe is it where the kynge is entitled but to the wardeshyppe of the heire of his tenaūt hee that is fermer of the dimise of a straūger shal not trauerse hys office althoughe the king be not entitled thereby to anye freeholde for it was not the minde of the makers of these statutes to helpe them that clayme but chatels which are accompted in law as nothing because they perishe and abide not Et de minimis non curat lex Howbeit learne what the law wil in these cases for I haue seene noe bookes of them The lorde in title of wardshyppe shal trauerse the office and yet hee claymethe but a terme of yeares in the lande as where it is founde by office that such a one helde lands of the king in chief and dyed his heire within age where in deede he holdeth no suche lande of the kynge but onelye of mee by knightes seruice in this case I that am lorde shall trauerse this office that is to saye shewe howe they bee holden of mee by knightes seruyce without that they be holden of the king as appereth in 1. H 7. Trauers 20. For ther it toucheth the lords inheritance in the righte of his seignory because he by the false office is to lose the profit that is presently fallen by reason of his seignorie it is reason he be receaued to trauerse the office But if hee were but lorde in socage he shoulde not be receiued to his trauerse because he therby can make no title to the wardshippe of the body 37. lib. ass P 35. and landes of the childe for it is a good generall grounde if the kynge be once seised his highnes shall reteine against all other that haue noe title notwithstandinge it be found allso that the kynge had no title but that the other had possession before him as appeareth in .37 lib ass where it was found that neither the kinge nor the partie had title and yet adiudged that the kynge shoulde reteine for thoffice that fyndes the kyng to haue a right or title to entre makes euer the king a good title allthough it bee false and his highnes therby maye take possession against any other that is seised of the landes and reteyne vntill such time as thoffice be trauersed by him that hath title and tried to bee a false offyce And therfore no man shal trauerse thoffice vnlesse he make him selfe a title And if hee can not proue his title to be true allthoughe he be able to proue his trauerse to bee true yet this trauerse wil not serue him As for an exāple it is foūd the kyngs tenaunt died seised of certayn lands that he held of the kynge in chiefe his heire beeinge within age where in dede he had made a feffement in his life time to an other of those landes it is no trauerse for the feffee to say he dyed not seised but he must first make him selfe a title by the feffement and for asmuch as it is founde that the landes are holden in chiefe if he wyl make his title good againste the kyng he must shewe fourth a lycence of alienation or a dispensation therof or els hee muste trauerse the tenure in chiefe as well as he shall doe the rest of thoffice otherwise his tytle is not good Trauers P. 44. et 46. Liuerie p. 18 as it appearethe in .36 E. 3. 3. H. 4. 6. H. 5. .3 H 7. f. 14. Howbeit Hussey holdeth opiniō that not mā may trauerse the tenure but the lord or the heire vnlesse his title be found by office but whether the lawe be so or not learn for as I take it the lorde and euery straunger that hath a tytle againste the kynge makinge his title shall trauerse the office before his title be found by office for when the trauerse is found for the partie his title nowe appeareth of recorde and by the trauerse found the office which was the kings title is vtterly destroyed gone so that now the king is not to make any liuerie of the lands to any person but onely to a moue his hands from the same with the meane issues and profites as one that had no cause to seise them And therefore euery man may enter now that will if he haue right or title of entrie to the lands for the king deliuereth them to no person certaine but onely ryddes his own hands of them as he that had neuer seised thē but otherwise it is where the king is to make liuerie for there his highnes must bee enformed certainly by mater of recorde who shal be his tenāt whoe it is that ought to receiue the liuerie at his handes least his highnes be deceiued in thadmitting of his tenant which ys ought to be a great mater towarde the lord therfore the cases be not lyke wherfore I think a man may trauerse by force of these statutes without hauing their title first found by office so be our bokes .36 E 3. 2. E. 4. f. 10. 16. E. 4. f. 4. Trauers 44. 43. li. ass P. 20. Howbeit 5. E. 4. fo 5. semes to weye to the cōtrarie hereof 12. H. 6. also where it is sayde that if it bee found that the kings tenāt died seised wher in dede he was iointly enfeffed with me now can I not trauerse this office except an other office were founde for me But contrarie lawe should it be if it had ben foūd by the office iointenant with hym for term of life wher in dede I was iointenaunt with him in fee simple in this case I may traūse thoffice because mētiō is made of me in the sayd office this boke case admitted to be law yet it varieth frō the case before remēbred of the strāger that trauersed thoffice for here thoffice is true and when it is found by office that he died seised this maye be allthough the sayde dying seised were iointlye with an other for any thynge that is expresselye founde to the certaintie and then the king here is to admit an other tenant as in the case of the liuerie before of whome as yet he hath no credible informacion that is to saye by mater of recorde and then it is lyke to the cases of tenant by the curtesie tenant in dower and the deuisee which in no wise can be admitted to their estats vnlesse mention be made of them in the office or some other office or mater of recorde found for them 9. H. 7. fo 24 Brief 618. as appearethe in 46. E. 3. M. 11. H. 8. and for none other reasō as I gather it but onely for that thoffice is
seisin can not be deliuered out of him vntill suche time an Ouster le maine bee sued as if the king be seysed by office of the lande of any Idiots or for aÌ„nuÌ„ diem vastuÌ„ of lands of any that is attainted in these cases he that shoulde haue these landes after the kynges title determined muste sue an Ouster le maine otherwise yt is where the kyng is not seised of the land but only entitled to the profites as of the landes of him that is outlawed in a personall action or of clerke conuicte or suche like there nede no Ouster le mayne to be sued as appeareth in .8 E. 2. 4. Trauers 28. E. 3. and .9 H. 6. f. 20. and if the landes whiche is seysed into the kynges handes bee holden ioyntlye bye manye yet euery one of them by hymselfe may sue hys Ouster le maine of his owne parte withoute his companions as appeareth in .2 Assise p. 166. H. 4. Lyuerye THe maner of the suing of a generall liuery doth partly appere in the title of Liuerie in the great abridgemeÌ„t of Iustice Fitsherbert A. 12. H. 4. ti Liuerie p. 4. A. 21. R. 2. ti Liuerie p. 5. Wher it is declared that after the heire that was in the kings warde is come to full age then a writ De etate probanda shal be awarded vnto the shirife of the shiere where the said heire was borne to eÌ„quire of his age in which case it is required by the lawe that euerye one that shall passe in that enquest shal be of the age of .xliij. yeares meaning therby that they euery one of them shoulde be of full age at birth of the childe beecause that suche haue better knowledge and remembraunce then other of lesser age haue and that the heire that is in warde enforme the enquest by certaine signes and tokens of the tyme of his birthe as to say that that yeare there was a great tempeste or a greate plague or suche like which signes so geuen in euidence shal be returned by the shiriue as well as the principall mater But whether it bee requisite to haue xij or a lesse number in the sayde enquest or not learn for soome think that any number from two vpwarde will serue beecause the triall is by proues and see the newe Natura breui um fo 136. wher it appereth that this writ of Etate ê“banda was directed to the eschetour of the countie where hee was borne and not to the shiriue Howebeeit note alwayes that theye wheare the lande is shall neuer enquire of this mater vnlesse the birthe and lande weare bothe in one shiere for theye haue enquired of it allredy that is to say when theye dyd fynde the firste offyce Thus when theye haue founde his age that enqueste shall bee returned into the Chauncerie and from thence shal bee awarded a write to the Lorde Keeper of the priuie seale signifying vnto him that the heire is of full age and vppon that a priuie seal shall bee directed to the Chamberlaine of Englande to receiue his homage whiche beynge receiued the sayde lorde Chamberlaine shall certifie the lorde Chaunceller by write of the receipte thereof and then shall the heire haue his liuerie But it seemes that if the heire were neuer in warde but of full age at death of his auncester and so founde by office that thenne hee shall haue liuerie as is declared vppon that office onelye without suynge anye write of Etate probanda for the writtes of liuerie in thys case make no mention of anye Etate probanda as they doe in the other case but if the heire bee withein age and in the kyngs warde and after when he comes to his ful age other landes descende vnto him whiche the kynge allso seisethe by an enqueste that fyndes the heire of full age yet this not withstandynge hee must now sue an Etate probanda vppon bothe offices as appearethe in M. 13. Henrye the fowerthe And the reason of it is M. 13 H. 4. beecause the fyndynge of hym of full age is but as voide as longe as there is a recorde whiche founde hym within age to the whiche record the kynge mighte cleaue vnto as the best recorde that makethe for hym vntyll suche tyme the contrarie thereof be proued bye the wryte of Etate probanda Howebeeit at this day the statut made Anno. 33. H. 8. hath much abridged the fees that haue bene geuen vpon the sute of a general liuerie namely for liueries to be sued of clere yearely value of v. li. or vnder and that it may be sued without any office to be founde But I do not see that the maner of the sute is in any other point altered or changed by the sayd statute but it remaines as it did before And that statute also geueth men licence to sue a generall liuerie of landes not excedinge the cleare yerelye value of .xx. li. whereby I see no let but that a man may sue his generall liuerie also for landes aboue the yerely value of xx li. as he might haue done before the makynge thereof for this statute is not contrarie to anye lawe that was before in that pointe sauinge that a general lyue uerie vnder the value of .xx. li. can not passe or be sued yf he haue not firste his warrant from the maister of the kynges wardes and liueries surueyours atturneys and generall receiuour or three of them signed and subscribed with their names and hands Thus may you see the maner of the suing forth of a generall liuerie which liuerie may not be sued by parcelles as I haue sayde before but entierlye that is to say of all the landes the kinge is or ought to be seised of in his right that sues the liuerie And therefore if the heyre sue liuery but of parcell of that that is founde by office or yf the auncester we are seised of other landes than are fouÌ„d bye office yf the heire sue his generall lyuerie beefore an offyce thereof founde omittinge them in the liuerye the lyuery is missued T. 12. R. 2.44 E. 3. f. 1â— et 25. 2. H. 7. f. 2. as appereth in .12 R. 2. 44 E. 3. 2. H. 7. and therefore it beehoues the heire beefore hee sue his lyuerye to cause an office to bee foynde in euerye sheere where hys auncester hadde anye landes And this entier lyuerye is intended as well of landes holden of other lordes beinge in the kinges handes as of the landes that are holden of the kinge and therefore if a manne holde of the king in chiefe by knightes seruice and of other lordes in socage and die his heir being a daughter within the age of xiiii yeres in this case when the sayd daughter cometh of the age of xiiii yeres she getteth no liuerie of the lands holden in socage but must tarry till she be of the age of xvi yeres that she may then sue liuerie of the whole as appereth .35 H. 6.
facient seruicia dominis feodi per manus primogenitae Nec potest primogenita ea ratione vel occasione a postnatis sororibus homagium vel custodiam vel aliquam aliam subiectioneÌ„ exigere vel habere Quia cum omnes sorores sint quasi vnus heres de vna hereditate si primo genita posset habere homagium aliarum sororum vel custodiam petere tunc esset illa hereditas diuisa ita quod primogenita soror esset simul et semel de vna hereditate domina et heres Here 's auteÌ„ suae partis et domina sororum suarum quod quidem in isto casu fieri non possit cum ipsa primogenita nihil posset petere plus quam aliae sorores nisi capitale mesuagium ratione eineciae Preterea si primogenita huiusmodi homagium a post natis sororibus suis acciperet esset quasi domina earum et habere posset custodiam earum et filiorum suorum et hoc esset quasi committere agnuÌ„ lupo ad deuorandum Et ideo vobis mandamus quod predictas consuetudines quas in regno nostro Anglie habemus in hoc casu vt predictum est in terra nostra Hiberniae proclamari ac firmiter teneri facias et obseruari In cuius rei c. Teste me ipso apud vvest ix die Februarii Anno regni nostri xiiii GlaÌ„uil li. 7. Before the makinge of this statute called statutum Hibernie it appereth by Glanuill which wrott in the tyme of kinge Henry the second that the husband of the eldest daughter should do homage vnto the Lorde for the hole inheritaunce and that the other daughters or theyr husbandes should do their seruice for theyr tenemeÌ„ts vnto the chief lord by the handes of theldest sister or her husband and yet they for the same should not be bound to do anie homage or fealti to the eldest sister or her husbaÌ„d duringe theyr liues ne yet that heires that come of them in the first degre or secoÌ„d degre But the heires in the third degre by the lawe of the Land were bouÌ„d to do homage to paye reliefe for their tenements vnto the heire of the eldest daughter Quod nota And the reason of it after the minde of Bracton which agreeth with Glanuille is this that when issue descendeth of them to the 3. or .4 degre it is not like that issue should faile of their bodies Bract ' li. de homÌ„ capieÌ„d and then may the heires of theldest daughter take homage verie well for it is vnlikely that the eldest daughter or her heires shoulde then haue the same by discent for these be his wordes Quia cum sint heredes tres de herede in heredeÌ„ extunc vix poterin deficere et ideo tunc sequitur homagium absquedaÌ„pno et periculo donatoris For if therwere likelyhode of the discent in this case the takinge of homage should be rather hurtfull then beneficial For by the ancieÌ„t Lawes if one had infeffed an other to holde of him and had taken his homage he could neuer be his heire afterwards but the next vnder the feoffor his heires of the kinred shoulde rather haue it As put case before the statute of Quia emptores the eldest sonne had enfeoffed the middelmost to hold of him and had taken his homage the middlemost dieth without issue the yongest should haue had the land and not the eldest because of the homage that he toke howbeit if there were no yonger sonne ne any other heire then the feoffor might claime the Land againe by eschete and not otherwise for as longe as there were any the feoffor or his heires of whome the Lands were so holden might not haue it And that Bracton sheweth also in his first boke in the title de maritagiiÌ„s reuersis ad donatoreÌ„ ê“ defectu heredis For he hath this text or sainge there quod homagium expellit dominicum et retinebit seruicium quod non potest quis esse dominus et heres so that you may nowe perceiue that this statute of Irelande agreeth with Glanuill sauing that Glanuill dilateth or declares the common law farther then this statute doth Also Bracton saith further in his title of Homage that if the eldest daughter in this case wil preuent the tyme and take homage before she nedeth she by that leseth the benefite of the discent saieth that the reason why the serâ—yce ought to be done by the eldest for them all is because the lord shal not be driuen to take his seruice by parcell mele further saith that although the eldest may not haue homage of her sisters forthwith but must tarry a tyme yet shall they out of hand do fealtie vnto her all the other seruices that are to be done the eldest shal do them ouer whiche is contrarie to Glanuill for he saith the other sisters shall doe neyther homage nor fealtie Howbeit Britton fol. 175. agreeth with Bracton and there setteth forth the manner of the fealtie by the yonger sisters to be done to the elder saith that it is at the eleccion of the lord whether he will take homage the other seruices by the handes of the eldest onely for theÌ„ all or else of euery sister seuerally for her seruice for if hee might not so doe the lord in proces of tyme might happelye lese the wardship of the heires of the other sisters because of the woordes in the write of Ward which are that the ancestours dyed in his homage that would be harde to trye when the homage was euer done vnto him onely by the eldest sister And Bracton in his said title of Homage sayeth Cum quelibet soror de facto acapitauerit dnÌ„o capitali hoc reuocari non poterit a primogenÌ„ vel eius marito sed semê‘ qd ' factum est tenebit quia capitalis dnÌ„s quod ei oblat ' est non recusabit sed siue tenuerint de dnÌ„o Rege siue de alio cuÌ„ homagium factum fuerit siue ante tercium hered ' siue post statim sequentur releuiuÌ„ et alia seruicÌ„ a little before that sayeth si plures sorores de dnÌ„o rege tenuerint in capite tuÌ„c pri mogenit ' missa omnes acapitabunt et homagium facieÌ„t dnÌ„o Regi and therwith agreeth Britton fo 171. And yet fo 198. saieth that theldest only shall do homage vnto the kinge for her selfe her sisters Thus haue you now thexposition of the said statut of Ireland by the olde writers by which said statute the saide writers yt appeareth that this statut of Prerogatiue is but a confirmacion of the common lawe doth only set forth declare what the kings Prerogatiue is wheÌ„ landes holden in chiefe discend to twoe coparceners For in this the king hath a Prerogatiue aboue a comon person aswel for that they shal seuerallye holde of his highnes as for that that his highnes shall make the particion for
in this case if ther bee an other record found that proueth the landes to be holden of the kinge in capite vppō these .ii. records together proces shal be made against the partie by Scire facias to come and shewe why he should not make a fine for the alienacion Like lawe it is where there is a record to proue that he that aliened is but tenant in taile of the kinges gift and he pretendinge to be tenant in fee simple doth purchace a licence of alienaciō and a lienethe and after dyethe without issue which deathe is founde by office but nothinge of his state taile or lycence appeareth in the sayde office yet vpon all these recordes laied together the king shal haue a Scire facias against the alienee to show why the land should not be seised in to his handes and his highnesse aunswered of the profites since the death of tenaunt in taile for when hee was but tenaunt in tayle it appearethe that the lycence was pourchased vpon false suggestyon and so voyde 40. li. assise in Fit ti Garde P. 1. and thenne the landes ought to reuerte to the kynge beecause hys reuercion coulde not bee discontinued And this maye yowe see 40. li. ass Then laste of all it is to bee seene whether the possession may bee taken from the kynge bye entrye or not And as to that yf the kynges possession bee by matter of recorde noe persone can dysseise hym or take the possession from hym for lyke as the kynge maye not take by gyfte from anye persone but by matter of recorde noe more maye the possession departe from hym but by matter of recorde and therefore his hyghnes cā not haue assise or Electione firme siue custodie lyke as a common persone maye yea and thoughe the entrie bee not immedyatlye vppon hym but vppon his committee or fermer yet it is noe disseisin to his hyghnesse as it appearethe 4. H 7. folio 2. M. 2. H. 4. M. 14. E. 4. folio 35. H. 6. in Fits titulo Suggestion P. 9. 2 M. 35. H. 6. folio 1 Bye the whiche sayde booke of 35. it also appearethe that if the kynge or hys commyttee bee cast oute of the wardeshyppe of the landes that the remedy is in thys manner that is to saye vppon suggestion thereof made in the Chauncerye there shal bee awarded a wrytte called Amoueas manum and that vppon a certaine payne whyche wrytte maye bee awarded onelye vppon this suggestion wythoute anye presentmente or enquirie and thys writte maye bee graunted to the committee as well beefore possession hadde of the warde as after for where the kynge was once possessed by office and grauntes it ouer yet this possession styll remaines for the kynge abydeth stil gardeyne notwythstandynge anye such graunt And therefore this writte of Amoueas sub pena lyethe for the grauntee or committee although the graunt be absque aliquo inde reddendo And if vppon this writte of Amoueas the defendant do not restore the thing then shall goe out againste him an attachement vpon which writ the defendant maye appeare and shewe his title which if it be founde agaynste him he shall then make restitucion by iugement and paye a fyne and aunswere the meane issues profites Thus dothe it appeare that the king cannot be disseised or eiected if his highnesse bee once seised by mater of recorde Otherwyse it is before his seisin bee by mater of recorde for if beefore office a straunger entre by title or without title this is no intrusion vpon the kinges possession but in this case the heire may haue Assise of mort dauncester againste the straunger if hee will whiche proues that by his entrie hee hath gottē bothe a freeholde and a fee simple But as sone as the office is founde and the eschetoure entreth this possession of the straunger whiche entred witheoute title is clerely vndone and the freeholde and the fee simple reuested in the heyre But if the entrie of the straunger weare by title and afterwarde office is founde and the kynge seisethe whether then it bee so or noe learne And it shoulde seeme to bee all one or els the kynges seisure is not good for howe can the kynge seise in an other bodyes ryghte if the ryghte weare taken awaye beefore by an entrie therefore it shoulde seeme eyther hys highnesse hathe noe title in that case to seise or els by his seisure the freeholde and the fee simple muste reuest in the heire But note that if the kynge wyll bye coloure of a recorde seyse an other mannes lande whiche recorde geeues him noe title in deede notwythestandynge anye suche seysure yet hee that hathe righte maye entre vppon the kynge and bye his entrie reuestes agayn in himselfe bothe the freeholde and fee simple as where it is foūd the kynges tenaunte dyed seysed but of an estate for terme of lyfe the reuersion to an other and thys notwythestandynge the kynge seisethe in this case if hee in the reuersion entre vppon the kynge this is a good entrie and therefore the case was hee made a feffement after his entrie and it was thoughte to be a good feffemēt Like law is it where the kynge is entitled but onelye to the profites as vppon an vtlagarie in a parsonall action or vpon the conuiction of a clerke in these cases if the partie entre and make a feffemēt or if a straunger that hathe title to entre do entre hee dyschargeth the kynge of hys interest and of these maters Trauers 12. Assise 156. you shal find bokes 8. H. 4. f. 16. 21. E. 3. f 1. 3 H. 7. 10. E. 3. 27. ass P 15. 9. H. 6. f. 20. 21. H. 7. f. 7. Enterpleder SOmetyme it happenethe that by two seuerall offices founde in one countie seuerall parsones be seuerallye founde heires to one man wherebye forasmuche as the kinge is brought in doubt to whiche of them his hyghnesse maye make liuerie they therefore muste firste enterplede and when by enterpleder the priuitie of the bloode is tried beetweene them then his highnesse oughte to make the liuerye to him that is tryed to bee the nexte heire of him that dyed As for an example by one Diem clausit or specyall commission in one countie one is founde heire to hym that dyed the kyngs tenant and of full age and by an other Diem clausit or speciall commissiō in the same countie one other is founde heire also to hym that dyed and within age in this case the heire that was firste founde shal haue a Scire facias in the chauncerie against hym or her that was last foūd heire to come shew why liuerie should not be made vnto hym that last dyed seised thereof vppon whiche writte yf a Scire feci be returned and the partye defendaunt cometh not or yf he come and confesse that he hymselfe is not heire then the plaintife in the Scire facias shal haue hys lyuerie but if hee come
Thus haue I opened declared the maner of suing a peticion but to declare specially where yt lyeth where not it were a long mater to entreate of But generally by generall rules a man may brieflye declare it that is to say in all cases where the partie hath a right against the king yet no trauerse or Monstrans de droit will serue ther is hee driuen to his peticioÌ„ As for an exaÌ„ple wher the king is entitled by double mater of recorde Like law is where he is entitled by a record not trauersable as take the case the kynge recouered by assent and wythout title a straunger that hathe good title shall not salsifie this recouerie by a trauerse or MoÌ„strans de droit but is driuen to his peticion so it is where the kinge recouerethe by erronyous proces the partie shall not haue a write of errour vntill he haue sued by peticion for it So likewise it is if landes are holden of mee bye knightes seruice a straunger brynges a Precipe in capite of those lands against my tenant recouereth by defaut although by this recouerie I am not put out of possession of mye seignorie but that the tenaunt holdethe of me as hee did before and also of the kinge by conclusion yet in this case if the recouerer dye his heire wythin age and the kynge seisethe the ward I am driuen nowe to my peticion for the ward 17. E. 3. f. 36. as appearethe in .17 E. 3. for thys ys an other thinge than euer I was seised of Allso it is a generall rule that where a straunger that hathe title can not entre vpon a coÌ„mon parson but is driuen to his action there he caÌ„ haue no remedy against the king but only a peticioÌ„ as take the case to be It is found by office the kings tenant in chiefe died seised his heire within age where in dede the sayd tenant had nothing but by disseisin done to me I suffred him to die seised wtout any claim made in this case I get no remedy by Monstraunce de droit or trauerse but am driuen to mye peticion And so in all cases like wheare mine entre should be tolled if the lands were in the hands of a commoÌ„ person as appeareth in 8. 9. H. 4. M. 7 H. 4. fo 27. 36. et 41. T. 9. H. 4. f. 7 et 11. Also where as the kinge doth entre vpon me hauing no title by mater of recorde or otherwise and put me out and deteines the possession froÌ„ me that I can not haue it againe by entrie without suite I haue then no remedie but onely by peticion But if I bee suffred to entre mine entrie is laweful and no intrusion or if the king graunt ouer the lands to a straunger then is my peticion determined and I may nowe entre or haue mye assise by order of the common law against the said strauÌ„ger being the kings patentee as appeareth in 4. E. 4. f. 23. Assise P. 156 M 24. E. 3. f. 34. And a great difference is betwene this case the case wher the king is entitled by double mater of record or suche like for in these cases notwithstanding the graunt made ouer by his highnes of the lands to an other yet am I driuen still to my peticion to the king and haue no other remedye but it is not so in this case and the reason of this diuersitie is because that when his highnes seiseth by his absolute power contrarie to the order of his lawes although I haue no remedy against him for it but by peticioÌ„ for the dignities sake of his person yet when that cause is remoued a comon person hath the possession then is mine assise reuiued for now the patentee entreth by his owne wronge and intrusion and not by anye title that the kynge geeueth hym for the king had neuer title ne possession to in that case and therfore not lyke the other cases beefore where the kynge hath the landes by the order of his lawes that is to saye by doble mater of record or such other like Trauers 134 And this apperethe in 4. E. 4. f. 21. et 25. et in 24. E. 3. f. 34. et 33. li. ass Like lawe is if I haue a rent charge oute of certaine lande and the tenant of the land enfeffed the kinge by dede enrolled nowe during the kinges possession I must sue by peticion but if his highnes enfeffe a stranger I may distreine for my rent vpon the stranger and so is it in all the cases before where a man may haue his trauerse or monstrance de droit if the laÌ„ds be once out of the kings hands the party theÌ„ may haue his remedie that the comoÌ„ law geueth him for in all these cases the peticion did lye onely for the dignitie of his person and not for the right that he had to the possession of the thing But if the kinge purchaceth lands holden of mee learne what remedie I may haue for my seignory during the kinges possession for wilby sayeth in 20. E. 3. that I haue no remedie in the case and if his highnes make a feffmÌ„t of these lands to hold of him self Assise 124. yet can I not distreine for my seignorie like as I might do in the case of the rent charge before bicause there can not bee ii seignories of one self land but am driueÌ„ to my petitioÌ„ in this case PeticioÌ„ 1â— for the king vpon this feffmÌ„t by order of his lawes shoulde haue reuiued the seignorie in mee that is to say to haue aâ—de the feffee to hold of me of whome it was hold before as appereth in 46. M. E. 3. 7. E. 3. f. 59 and so hathe it ben vsed alwayes where his highnes hathe lands by forfaiture of treson holden of a coÌ„mon person if he make a feffement of those lands it must be Tenend of them that they were holden of before as I haue opened vpon the xii chapter of the kinges prerogatiue And so it is where the time is coÌ„cluded to his highnes for a mortmain But that is geuen by the statut de religiosis Also if the kinge disseise my tenaÌ„t during this possessioÌ„ I haue no remedie for my seignorie but only by peticyon if the kinge eÌ„feff mye tenaÌ„t to hold of his highnes yet haue I no remedy for my seignorie but only by peticion But if one holde certeine landes of mee which are falsly found by office to be holden of the kinge in Capite and the king seiseth them enfeoffeth my tenaunt thereof to holde of his highnes in this case I may nowe distreine for my seignorie am not oute of possession Auowrye 113. Assise 122. 124. these cases appere .20 32. et 46. E. 3. fo 1â— the reason of the diuersitie is this because that in the laste case my seignorie was neuer suspended but euer more had his being and that
in cancellarie noÌ„ obstante quadam ordinatione nuper per dominum regem facta de terris tenÌ„ in manum suam per ministros suos capt ' non liberand ' nisi per ipsum dominum regem prout continetur in quadam diuidenda inter ipsum regem cancellarium facta Cuius vna pars penes cancellarium remanet Statutum de escaetoribus editum .29 E .2 Also a yeare before the makinge of this statut was there an other statut made entitled articuli super cartas which in the 19. chapiter therof saith in this wise De rescheiue la ou lesche tour ou le vicont seisont en le main le roy terres la ou il nad reson de seiser et puis quant troue est la non reson les issues de mesne teÌ„ps ount este ceo en arrere retenê° et nad rendus quant le roy ad le main ouste voet le roy que desormes la ou terres sont issint seisies et puis le main ouste pur ceo que il ny ad raison de seiser ne tenir soient les issues pleinment reÌ„dus a celuy a qui la terre demurt et auoit le damÌ„ resceu By this statute it plainly appereth how that before the making therof therewas no ouster le main graunted vna cum exitibus although it might neuer so plainly appere that the kinge had no cause to seise Howbeit that mischief is now remedied by both these statutes Also by the one of these statutes Also by th one of these statutes it appeareth that the Ouster le maine in suche case might not be graunted without suinge to the kinge himselfe which is also remedied by this statut de escaetoribus which statute although it make no mencion of liueries but onely of ouster le maine yet lyueries are taken to bee within the compasse and prouision of the same And where the letter goeth onelye to the cases where the kinge seiseth before office 9. E. 4. 54. and after warde thoffice that is founde doth giue his highnes no title that there the party may haue his Ouster le maine makinge no mencion of an Ouster le maine to be graunted vppon anye peticion trauerse or Monstraunce de droit as in deede a trauerse was not in vre at that time yet men by an equitie extende this statute de Escaetoribus bothe to the one and too the other because the statute is beneficiall as it appeareth 9. E. 4. and in diuers other bookes And Yeluerton there saieth that if after liuerie or ouster le maine an office bee founde whiche entitleth the kinge of a title growen vntoo him since the liuerie or ouster la maine granted that in that case this statute notwithstanding the kinge may reseise wtout a Scire facias for the woordes are onelye where a record or an office is founde that maintaineth the title whereby the kinge first seised Howbeit manye holde oppinion againste him and saie that it was in the selfe same mischiefe the statute was made for tamen quere for this statut de escaetoribus shoulde seeme to be meant onely to remedy that the was a mischief at comoÌ„ law before the making of the said statut as where there was no record found at the time of the liuerie or ouster le maine sued to let or hinder the partie from suynge of theire saide liuerie or ouster le maine but afterwardes was there found such a record now this notwithstandinge would the king reseise putt the partie from his possession wtout answer or any proces sued against him wherupon he might answer so driue him to sue by peticion make him render all the mene profite which was a greate mischiefe hinderance to the partie for remedie whereof this statut was made but the like mischiefe or hinderance is not where the kinge is entitled by a title groweÌ„ since the liuerie or ouster le maine for here the partie shall not aunswere the profites but froÌ„ the time of this title growen And also the kyng doth him no wronge for it standes with and affirmes the liuery or ouster le maine the king thereby makes not that party an intrudor as he doth in the other case if the said Yeluertons opinion should not be lawe they woulde make that the kinge could not seise vpon an alienacion wtout licence made and found by office since the liuerie or ouster le maine sued which were no reson therefore I think the saide Yeluertons opinion should preuaile in this case And to the same intente effect be those bookes that I can fynd for I can finde no Scire facias sued but in cases of a title growen before the liueries or ouster le maine therefore in a Scire facias sued vpoÌ„ this statute against the party that had liuerie or ouster le maine beeing tenant of the land at the time of Scire facias sued he was denâ—ed in the selfe same plight course against the king as he was at time of the suing of his liuerie or ouster le main for where he had made a feffement by licence taken an estate againe iointly to him other yet this scire facias dyd lye against him soly did not abate for the iointenauntes So was it aiudged in a scire facias sued vpon this statute the the partie must maintaine the title whereby he hath liuery or ouster le maine must maintaine it so that it is was a good title sufficient to haue liuerie vpoÌ„ notwithstanding any recorde that is now found as take the case to bee this one hath liuerie as sole daughter heire after by office it is founde that she hath a sister which ought to haue had liueri with her wherupon a scire facias is sued against the partye that had liuerie to come shew why the land should not bee reseised if she come will saye that they be daughters by seueral ventres that this lande was geeuen to her father mother in speciall taile so ought shee to haue the liuere as she had the is to say soly this plea wil not serue her because it doth not mainteine the liuerie for how could she haue had liuerie soly vnlesse this matter had bene so found by office For if this second office had appeared before the liuerie she coulde not haue trauersed it vnlesse she had made title and then title can shee neuer make againste the kynge as heyre vnlesse the saide title bee firste founde by office Wherfore no more than she might trauerse the said office if it had bene found before liuerie Trauers 31. no more may she trauerse it now in this scire facias after liuerie as it appereth 30. li. Ass and so note that the recorde can not bee trauersed in this scire facias in no case vnlesse it were trauersable before liuery or ouster le maine Also in
the new Natura breuium fo 26â— and in .5 H. 5 H 5. H. 5. I finde a scire facias sued vpon this statute against him that had liuerie because an office hath found an other to be nerer heire to the auncestour that dyed than was hee that sued liuerie So alwaies as farre as I can finde it is sued vppon a recorde the disproues the liuerie or ouster le maine and not vpon any that affirmes it whereby I suppose that yeluertons opinion is lawe as is beefore declared And it semes that by this statute the king must sue a scire facias al though the recorde or title that is found for him bee founde within a yere after liueri or ouster le maine sued And lerne whether Assise lye against the eschetour that sesseth without a scire facias in cases where a scire facias should be sued For by the sta of W. 1. ca. 24. assise lieth against him in cases wher he seiseth anye landes by colour of his office wtout speciall warrant or commaundement or certeine authoritie that be longeth to his office so to doe And learne whether the king by that seisure hath any possession for if the king seise without a scire facias where he ought to sue a scire facias the partie hath no remedy but to sue vnto him by peticion euen as he should do if his highnes had seised any other lands of his without cause Howbeit the king by such a reseiser vndoeth not the parties possession so that he shal bee saide an entruder from the time of the liuerie or ouster le maine sued as it doth in case the reseiser had bene vpon a scire facias wherfore in such case although the partie cannot be suffred to recouer his possession againe by entrie vppon the king yet when the kinge graunts it ouer he may now enter or haue assise Trauers 26. as appeareth .24 E. 3 fo 34. et 43. li. Ass Also note that this statute that geeues the scire facias extendes but vntoo him or them haue liuerie or ouster le maine or anye other claiming by them For if after liuerie on ouster le maine sued a stranger by an eigne title in disaffirmyng the tenaÌ„ts interest enter as heire vpon him or recouer by assise of mor dauncester or any other accion auncestrell against him is entred into the land as heire nowe because the landes are holden of the king in chiefe his highnes may seise the saide land for primer seisine or title of Wardshippe as the case doth require without any scire facias 21. E. 3. fo 1. as appeareth .21 E. 3. For it is not to be said now a reseiser because against hym there was no seiser made of the saide landes before And lerne enquire if he that missueth the liuerie be within age whether the king shal reseise in that case as he shall doe if it were missued by one of ful age as take yâ— case to bee landes are holden of the kinge in Socage in Capite now the liuerie is sued within age that is to saye at the age of .14 yeres whether in this case the missuing of the same shall be a cause of reseiser or not T. 12. R. 2 see the booke thereof 12. R. 2. The wordes of the statute be further that if any record be found in the tresorie or elles where that vpon this record a scire facias shall be awarded But that is to bee vnderstande in this maner that first the transcript of the said record shal be by writ remoued into the Chauncerie and then out of the Chauncery shal there be a scire facias awarded not out of the tresory as it appeareth .21 â—â— li. ass lib. Ass Issues mesne NOte that if the king haue a title right or interest to any lands or tenements his highnes wheÌ„ he seiseth shal be aunswered of all the mesne issues and profites from the time of his sayd title right or interest growen and whether it be a right of entre or title of entre it maketh no diuersitie in the kinges case as for an example the king entreth for a condition broken his highnes shal be answered of all the issues and profites sins the condicion broken and yet in that case a common person shal not haue the issues and profites but from the time of his entrie Like law is it if the kinges tenaunt aâ—en in mortmain and the kinge entreth but otherwise it is if he entre for mortmain in lands not holden of him vpon a title deuolued vntoo his highnes in defaut of other lords And these cases appere H. 19. et 41. E. 3. fo 21. 19. E. 3. Entre coÌ„g P. 39. The same law is it where his highnes is entitled to seise for that the lands are of his foundatioÌ„ and aliened contrarie to the statut of west .2 ca. 41. which geues the writtof contra formaÌ„ collationis H. 46 E. 3. Forf P. 18. in this case his highnes shal be answered of all the mesne issues growen from the time of the alienatioÌ„ as appereth H. 46. E. 3. And note also that if the king make any graunt which is not sufficient in the law or is deceiued in the making of the same by reason it was made vpon a false suggestion in his case if this highnes doth resigne this graÌ„t adnull it iure regis as he may he shal be then be answered of all the mesne issues profits which were lost by reason of the sayde insufficient graunt as appereth .11 H 4. But if his highnes bee entitled to any lands nomine destriccionis there his highnes shall not bee answered of the profites but from the finding of that title 11. H. 4. f. â— as in case where the kinges tenant in chief alieneth without licence and an office is therof found in this case his highnes shal not be answered of the profites from the time of that alienation but onely from the tyme of the findinge of the office or from the tyme of a Scire facias returned wher the alienatioÌ„ is of record P. 8. e. 4. f. 4 and herof see the booke 8. E. 4. Like law is where his highnes is to seise the lands of his widow that hath maried her selfe without his licence 40. li. Ass Gard P. 36. And note that where the king is to be aÌ„swered of the mesne issues and profits perceued and taken of any landes which haue come to soÌ„dry hands sins the kings title first growen to the same there euery one of them that haue sondrely so perceiued and taken the profits shal answer for his owne time and not one for all as it appereth in the boke of 46. before remembred And note also that by the statut of w. 2. ca. 32. it is prouided that if any spiritual man bring any real action and recouer that the land recouered shall remayne in the kinges hands vntill such time as it be sued out of his hands by him that recouered or els by the chiefe lorde and in the meane time the shiriue shal auÌ„swer the kinge in the eschequer of the profites by which statut whether the collusion bee found or not found yet the king shal haue the meane issues as it is thought 20. H. 6. 20. H. 6. f. â— So it is in a writ iudicial of deceite brought against any the king shall haue the issues growen from the time of the first iugement vntill iugement be geueÌ„ in the sayd writ of disceit ¶ Some tymes the kynge recouâ—eth of the issue in the allowance of an estraunge tytle as yf the husband beynge the kynges tenant vpon a false suggestion purchaseth lycence to alieÌ„ to take estate to him to his wife so doth afterward dyeth the wife holdeth her in by title of Suruiuor occupieth nowe vpoÌ„ a Scire facias against the wife his highnes shal bee answered of all the meane issues since her occupiynge of the ii parts of the land and the thyrd part he recopeth and alloweth for her dower .40 li. Ass P. 36. ¶ Note that in a writ of disceit vpon a recouery in a Preeipe quod reddat of land where the proces was a graÌ„d Cape 40. Li. Ass Gard. P. 1. if the pleintyfe recouer he shall recouer the land and his damages but not the issues of the land synce the fyrst iudgement because the kinge shall haue them by the graunde Cape and the shirife accomptable of theÌ„ quod vide titulo disceit in Fitz P. 33. 46. 7. 32. Contrarie lawe is it if there lie no grand Cape in the action as if the recouerie be in a Scire facias as it appereth titulo Disceit in Fitz P. 36. 27. Finis Diuers other prerogatiues therbe which the kiÌ„g hath by the order of the comoÌ„ law that be not wtiÌ„ this statute coÌ„priÌ„sed a great part wherof vnder the title of Prerogatife master Fitz herbart hath most diligeÌ„tli noted in his great AbridgmeÌ„t so well ordred placed there that I doo of purpose omit to reherse them here The rest woulde require so longe a serche that oneles I had gathered and noted them al redie as I haue not doÌ„e in dede I should be faine to peruse the hole bodie of the comoÌ„ Lawes for the knowleg therof wheruntoo time seruethe mee not wherefore at this time myne intent is not to medle with them Imprynted at London in flete strete within temple Barre at the signe of the hand starre by Rychard Tottel An. 1567. Cum priuilegio