est haeres viventis and the remainder is onely good upon this contingent if I. S. dieth during the life of the lessor Coke com f. 378. a. But if lands be given to A. and B. so long as they joyntly together live the remainder to the right heires of him which dieth first and warranteth the land in forma praedicta A. dieth his heire shall have the warranty and yet the remainder vested not during the life of A. for the death of A. must precede the remainder and yet shall the heire of A. have the land by descent vide ibidem 378. b. Justum non est aliquem ante natum mortuum facere Bastardum qui toto tempore suo pro legitimo habebatur Coke l. 8. f. 101. a. b. It is not just to make any one a Bastard borne before marriage being dead who all his life time was accounted legitimate For by the law of England if such a Bastard which the law termeth Bastard eigne doth continue possession in peace that is if the mulier make no entry for the Bastard eigne or continuall claime and so dieth in peace his issue is become right heire and will bar the mulier because he was legitimate by the lawes of the holy Church For though the subsequent marriage doth not make a Bastard legitimate quoad consuetudinem regni as â—ract phraseth it in regard of the custome of the Realme yet quoad sacerdotium in respect of the Canon law it doth and in this case of legitimation which in law is so precious and of so great estimation the law respecteth neither infancy or other defects in the mulier but preferreth legitimation of blood before any benefit of temporall inheritance and therfore the law saith that by the death of Bastard eigne in peace his issue is become right heire and by consequence the mulier is barred and the descent doth not onely take away the entry but the right also and therefore descent in this case shall be a bar to right as descent of services rents reversions expectant upon an estate taile shall bar the right of the mulier 14. E. 2. Bastardy 26. but not the entry or claime of the disseisee But if a Bastard eigne dieth without issue so as the land doth descend the mulier shall have it ibidem and if the Lord by escheat entreth this shall not bar the mulier because no descent Coke com 244. If there be Bastard eigne and mulier puisne and the father maketh lease for life reserving rent and the bastard eigne receiveth the rent and dieth having issue this shall barr the mulier Coke com f. 15. a. If a man hath issue a son being a Bastard eigne and a daughter and the daughter is married the father dieth and the son entreth and dieth seised this shall barre the feme covert and the descent in this case of services rents reversions expectant upon estate or for life whereupon rents are reserved c. shall bind the right of the mulier but the descent of these shall not bind them that right have to an Action Coke com f. 244. a. So if the Bastard dieth seised and his issue endoweth the wife of the Bastard the mulier cannot enter upon tenant in dower for his right was barred by the descent ibidem If the Bastard eigne entreth into land and hath issue and entreth into religion this descent shall bar the right of the mulier ibidem If a man hath issue two daughters the eldest being Bastard eigne and they enter and occupy peaceably as heires the law shall not adjudge the whole possession in the mulier so as if the Bastard had issue and died her issue shall inherit and if they make partition that partition shall binde the issue for ever Coke com 244. a. b. And such a Bastard being impleaded or vouched shall have his age If a man hath issue a Bastard eigne or mulier puisne and the Bastard in the life of the father hath issue and dieth and then the father dieth seised and the son of the Bastard entreth as heire to his Grand-father and dieth seised this descent shall bind the mulier ibidem b. If the Bastard enter and the mulier dyeth his wife being privement with a Son and the Bastard hath issue and dyeth seised the Son is borne his right is bound for ever but if the Bastard dyeth seised his wife enseint with a Son the mulier entreth and the Son is borne the issue of the Bastard is barred ibidem 244. a. If the bastard eigne entreth and the King seiseth the Land for some contempt committed by the Bastard for which the King receiveth the profits of the Land and the Bastard dyeth and his issue upon petition is restored to the possession the mulier barred for ever But when the King seiseth for a contempt of the Father c. if the issue of the Bastard eigne upon petition be restored for that the seisure was without cause the mulier is not barred for the Bastard could never enter but the possession of the King in that case shall be adjudged in the right of the mulier Coke ibidem f. 245. b. Bastardus nullius est filius Littleton Coke com f. 203. a. aut filius populi Coke l. 6. f. 6. A bastard is the Son of none or the Son of the people according to the common report Cui pater est populus pater est fibi nullus omnis Cui pater est populus non habet ille patrem To whom the people Father is to him is Father none and all To whom the people Father is well Fatherlesse we may him call For as the civilians pater est quem nuptiae demonstrant he is a Father whom the espousalls and nuptialls shew so to be And therefore if a wife have a bastard it shall not be a villaine or if a villaine have a bastard by a woman and marrieth her the bastard is no villaine because he is nullius filius though some hold the contrary as Bracton and Britton for in both cases the issue at the common Law is a bastard quasi nullius filius Coke com f. 123. a. And though a bastard be a reputed Son yet is he not such a Son in consideration whereof an use may be raised because in judgement of Law he is nullius filius Dyer 374. And for the same reason where the Statute of 32. H. 8. of wills speaketh of children bastard children are not within that statute and a bastard of a woman is no child within that Statute where the mother conveyeth Lands unto him Dyer 313. Qui ex damnato coitu oriuntur inter filios non computantur Coke com f. 3. b. Who are borne of condemned or unlawfull copulation are not to be reckoned among children as a man maketh a lease to B. for life the remainder to the issue male of B. and the heires males of his body B. hath issue a bastard Son he shall not take the remainder because
renunciaverit amplius repetere non potest n. f. 139. a. As a Retraxit is a bar of all other actions of the like or inferior nature for he which once renounceth his action can no more renew it It is a generall rule that non-suite before appearance is not peremptory in any case for that a stranger may purchase a writ in the name of him who hath cause of action and regularly a non suit after appearance is not peremptory but that he may commence an action of like nature againe for it may be he hath mistaken something in that action or was not provided of his proofes or mistaken the day or the like But yet for some speciall reasons non-suit in some actions is peremptory as in a quare impedit if the Plaintiff bee non-suit after apparance the Defendant shall make a title and have a Writ to the Bishop and this is peremptory to the Plaintiff and is a good bar in another quare impedit and the reason is because the Defendant had by the judgement of the Court a writ to the Bishop and the incumbent which commeth in by that writ shall never be removed which is a flat barre as to that presentation and for the same law and upon the same reason so it is in the case upon a discontinuance Coke com f. 139. a. vide ibidem plura Actio personalis moritur cum persona a personall action dieth with the person Went. off of executors f. 1. 97. As if a keeper of a Prison suffereth one in execution to escape and dieth no action lyeth against his Executors If Lessee for yeares doth wast and dieth an Action of wast lyeth not against his Executor or Administrator for wast done before that time Coke com f. 53. b. so if the tenant doth wast and he in the reversion dieth the heire shall not have an Action of wast for the wast done in the life of his Ancestor nor the master of an Hospitall or a parson for wâ—st done in the life of the predecessor ibidem The Lessor covenants to pay quit rent during the terme and dieth his Executors shall not pay it because it is a personall covenant in the Lessor onely Dier 114. Yet if there be three copartners and they Lease the land and one of them die and hath issue and the Lessee commit wast and one of them die and hath issue the Aunt and the issue shall joyne in an Action of wast and the issue shall recover one moyety of the Land wasted and the Aunt the other notwithstanding that actio injuriarum moritur cum persona But in favorabilibus magis attenditur quod prodest quam quod nocet in indifferent and favourable things that which profiteth is more respected then that which hurteth Relatio tunc fieri non debet si per eam actus destruatur Reg. I. c. Decius 363. Quando dispositio referri potest ad duas res ita quod secundum relationeÌ„ una vitiatur secunduÌ„ aliaÌ„ utilis sit tunc facienda est relatio ad illam ut valeatdispositio semper ita fiat relatio ut valeat dispositio C. l. 6. f. 76. b. a. A relation then ought not to be when by it an Act is destroyed As in the statutes of 32. and 34. H. 8. concerning Wills whereof is provided that every person having any Mannors Lands c. holden in capite shall have full power c. to dispose by his last will in writing or otherwise by any Act or Acts lawfully executed in his life two parts of the same Mannor c. for the advancement of his wife preferment of his children and payment of his debt or otherwise at his will and pleasure any Law statute c. those words or otherwise at his wil pleasure have reference relation only to the last wil not to the acts executed for otherwise none might have devised two parts but onely for the advancement of his wife and preferment of his children or payment of his debts which is not the intention of the Act but that he may devise two parts to whom he will so that the third descend and it was in vaine to referre those words or otherwise at his will and pleasure to Acts executed for he can do that without any authority given to him by that act And therefore when the disposition may be referred to two things so as according to the relation one of them may be destroyed and according to the other shall be commodious then the relation is to be made to that that the disposition may be of force and alwayes the relation is so to be that the disposition may availe in Sir G. Cursons case So Coke l. 3. f. 28. b. Butler and Bakers case relation is a fiction in law to make a nullity of a thing from the beginning to a certaine intent which in truth had being and the rather for necessities sake ut res magis valeat quam pareat As if a man make a gift in taile to Baron and feme and afterwards grants the reversion of those Lands and since the Baron dies and the feme to have her dower waiveth and disagreeth to the estate taile now in regard of her it is a nullity of the estate from the beginning and to such an intent the Law faineth that the estate was onely made to the baron but as to the grant of the reversion that is a collaterall Act and her refusall shall not have such relation for she may be endowed though that estate stand and so no necessity and therefore without necessity ut res magis valeat the Law will not faine any nullity but in a destruction of a loyall estate vested the law will never make any fiction vide ibidem plura So relation shall make things have been as if as if they never had been 1. H. 7. 16 The husband disagreeth to a Feoffement made by his wife it is void from the beginning so that he may plead ne infeosse pas so 14. H. 8. 10. A devise is that the Executors may sell land c. when they sell all meane charges made by the heire in the interim shall be avoided by relation to the time of the death of the Testator so 14. H. 8 18. I disseise A. to the use of B. the dissiesee releaseth to mee and then B. agreeth with the disseisee this agreement by relation shall be as if he had agreed before the release and so shall defeat it Jurors alien their Lands away between the teste of the Writ of attaint and judgement yet they shall be charged to the King for the estreptment by relation 22. E. 3. 16. Caufe of Assise brought for rescuing a distresse taken for rent and then an Office is found which entitleth the King who seiseth the Land and then an Ouster le maine is sued the Assise is gone for ever because the King shall be said to be in possession at the time of the rescous
husbands because it is possible for the husband to have got it and whose soever the Cow is his is the Calfe also Swinwood f. 18. And if the issue be borne within a month or day after marriage between parties of a full lawfull age the child is legitimate Coke Com. f. 244. a. And in the legall understanding of the common Law he is said to be haeres who is ex justis nuptijs procreatus borne of lawful matrimony haeres legitimus est quem nuptiae demonstrant and he is a lawfull heire whom marriage demonstrated so to be Coke ibidem f. 7. b. Coke l. 7. f. 44. a. One who is engendred in avowtry during the coverture is a mulier by the temporall and common Law though a bastard by the spirituall Law Jus sanguinis quod in legitimis successionibus spectatur ipso nativitatis tempore quaesitum est Reg. I. C. The right of blood which is regarded in lawfull successions or inheritances is found in the very time of the nativity and therefore jus primogeniturae the tight of the elder Brother-ship in the cause of inheritance is principally to be respected because it is in the eldest Son and his issue per modum substantiae and that which is in any person per modum substantiae is inseperable from him and cannot be extended to any other besides it is against the Laws of proximity of degrees that those which are in a remote degree should be preferred before those of the next degree and therefore in all common weales for the most part proximity of blood hath been preferred of which we have a notable example confirmed by the act of Lycurgus the judicious Law-giver as when Eunonus King of the Lacedaenonians had two Sons Polydectes the elder and Lycurgus the younger and Polydectes deceased leaving no Son living at the time of his death the Scepter of the Kingdome was seated in the hands of Lycurgus afterwards when Polydectes Widdow had brought forth a Son Lycurgus did willingly and peaceably yeeld to him the Scepter which act of Lycurgus agreeth fully with our Laws whereby it is ruled that if a man have a Son and Daughter and the Son purchaseth Land and dyeth the Daughter entreth and after the Father begetteth another Son of the same Wife this Son shall have the Land 19. H. 6. b and is also ratified by diverse examples in the successions of our Kings I will instance onely in one and the most illustrious one King Edward the third being deceased Richard the second the Son of his eldest Son obtained the Kingdome and was preferred before John Edmund and Thomas the sons of the same King wheras any of them was more worthy and fit for the Scepter yet is it granted that in succession of regall dignity jus primogeniturae is not constantly observed because in that case the good of the common-weale and commodity of the people is politically to be respected and as the Civilians the good estate of the Kingdome and Subjects is more to be heeded quam sangninis series then the pedigree of blood and so Solomon the younger Brother was advanced before the elder by the hand of David his Father and Roboam preferred Abias his younger Son yet this must be done cautiously and with a good conscience and intention and probably for the utility of the State otherwise it will neither please God nor man yet in the disposing of private estates the Law of Primogeniture is more strictly to be observed because by it confusion and dissention is avoyded which from the contrary doth proceed as is intimated by Coke l. 3. f. 40. b. Wherein our Law excelleth which preferreth the elder Brother and his issue before the younger Brother and his issue in case of descent and that jure sanguinis by his birth right as he is most worthy of blood and therefore as Coke in his com f. 14. a. The male and all descendant from him shall inherit before the female and among the males the eldest Brother and his posterity shall inherit Lands in Fee-simple as heire before any younger Brother or any descending from him whereas by the Civill Law the inheritance is divided among the males Lutleton l. 1. c. 1. There be three Brothers and the middle Brother purchaseth Lands in Fee simple and dyeth without issue the elder Brother shall have the Land by descent so also it is if the youngest purchaseth Lands in Fee and dyeth without issue the eldest shall have it jure sanguinis because he is the worthiest of blood Little So if a man enfeoffe another upon condition and the condition is broken and then the Feoffor dyeth without issue his wife privement ensaint and the Brother of the Feoffor enter for the condition broken and after a Son is borne he shall avoid the possession of the Uncle and may lawfully claime the inheritance 9. H. 7. 25. And 9. H. 8. 23. It is said that after two or more descents the heire afterwards born claiming by descent may enter into Land but he shall not have a Writ of account for the meane profits And though Littleton in defence of the custome of Gavelkind by which the issues may equally inherit alledgeth the reason that every Son is as great a Gentleman as the eldest Son is yet as Sr. Edward Coke com a. f. 14. saith Gentry and arms doth not descend to all the brethren alike for the eldest jure primogeniturae shall beare as a badg of his birth-right his Fathers armes without any difference because he is more worthy of blood but all the younger brethren shall give severall differences additio probat minoritatem and the addition demonstrateth and proveth the minority of the issue but by the Statute of 31. H. 8. A great part of Rent is made descendible to the eldest Son according to the course of the common Law for that by the meanes of that custome diverse antient and great families after a few descents came to very little or nothing according to the simile of the Poet In plures quoties rivos deducitur amnis Fit minor ac unda deficiente perit A Flood deduced into little streames Coke ibid. Soone groweth lesse and falleth by that meanes But in cases of purchase it is otherwise a. 15. E. 4. If a man devise land to a man and his heire and the devisee dieth having issue a daughter his wife privement enseint with a son who is afterwards borne the daughter shall enjoy the Land in perpetuum And 9. H. 6. 23. It is said that if the remainder cannot vest at any time when it falleth it shall not vest in him is borne afterwards where another hath entred before 2. Eliz. 190. Pl. 18. If a lease for life be made the remainder to the right heires of I. S. and I. S. is then alive the inheritance passeth presently out of the Lessor but cannot vest in the heire of I. S. for then living his father he is not in rerum natura for non
if an Action of wast be brought by two joynt-tenants the release of one shall bar the other as it is holden 9. H. 5. f. 15. by the Court for in wast the personalty is the principall and though one joynt-tenant cannot prejudice the other in regard of the matter of inheritance or franke tenement yet in regard of the profits of the frank-tenement they may vide ib. plura If husband and wife purchase socage lands to them and their heires of their bodies and they having issue within fourteen yeares of age doe dy in this case if the grandmother of the part of the mother of the issue first seise the Ward she shall have the Wardship and not the grandfather of the part of the father of the issue 8. Eliz. 296. b. because they are in aequali jure and where the right is equall the condition of the possessor is the better To which obiter may be annexed the sage judgement of Augustus who after the civill wars being molested with the complaints of diverse who demanded many places of ambiguous right from the possessors because they severally were given by the Senate Pompey Caesar Lepidus or Augustus to the Souldiers gave sentence for the possessors Duo non possunt unam rem in solido possidere R g. I. C. Vlpiamus Coke com f. 368. a. Two cannot possess one and the same thing fully and wholy for dominion had its beginning from possession and as there cannot be two Lords and Masters of one and the same thing fully and wholly so cannot two fully and wholly possess one and the same thing As if A. of B. be seised of a Mese F. of G. that hath no right to enter into the same Mese claiming the said Mese to hold to him and his heires entreth into the said Mese but A. of B. is continually abiding in the same Mese In this case the possession of the frank-tenement shall alwaies be adjudged in A. of B. and not in F. of G. because where two be in one house or other tenements and the one claimeth by one title and the other by another title the law shall judge him in possession that right hath for two cannot possess one and the same thing fully and wholly But if a man hath issue two daughters Bastard eigne and mulier puisne and dieth seised and they both enter generally the sole possession shall not be adjudged onely in the puisne because they claime by one and the same title Coke ibidem Yet though the possession of one thing cannot be fully and wholly but in one yet the property may be in two as Ployd f. 5. 24. Manwood said it is not strange in our law that two should have a severall interest in one and the same terme and two properties in it for if lessee for yeares grant over his terme to another by deed indented rendting rent and that for default of payment that he shall enter and retaine till the grantee hath paid to him the rent if he doe enter for default of payment and retaine he hath one property and the grantee also hath another property for his interest is not gone but hath a property tel quel such as it is and may have all the property upon payment of the arreares So if one hath a terme for yeares and is bound in a recognisance or statute staple and execution for non pay-ment is sued against him and the terme is extended and a certaine annuall value delivered to the Connusee as it well may be for it may bee sold out-right or extended to an annuall value there the connusee hath one property for the payment of his debt and the lessee another property and upon the payment of the debt shall have the terme again A woman made a lease for yeares of mills in Kent with exception that she should have the profits and there was a great debate whether the exception were good or no because the profits of the mills was all the benefit and in effect the mills themselves but at the last the exception was judged good in law and that the woman should have the profits There if shee enter to have the profits she hath one property and the lessee another property and it is incertaine how many yeares the property of the woman will continue So if one Lease sheep for a time to manure his land or pawn his dog as the case was in 5. H. 7. The owner hath some property and he to whom the Sheep is leased or the dog pawned another Ployd ibid. Possessio fratris de feodo simplici facit sororem esse haeredem The possession of the brother of a fee simple maketh the sister to be heire Littleton Coke com f. 14. b. As if one hath issue a son and a daughter by one venter and a son by another venter and dieth seised of Lands in fee-simple and the eldest son entreth into the land and dieth without issue the Sister shall have the land and not the younger son though the younger son be heire to the father for the possession of the brother of the fee-simple maketh the sister to be heire but the brother must be in Actuall possession and there must be pedis positio a corporall fixing of his foot and entry upon the land and there must be some Act done to make her heire for she is but haeres factus by the actuall possession of her brother for the younger son is haeres natus to the father and if the eldest son had died before he had taken actuall possession the younger son might have entred and had the land as heire to the father but by the possession of the brother she being of the whole blood is made heire But in dignities where no possession can be had but such as descendeth to a man and his heires as in Dukes Earles Barons c. there can be no possession of the brother to make the sister inherit but the younger brother being heire to the father shall inherit the dignity inherent to the blood as heire to him was first created noble Coke ibid. And as Ploydon saith there is a great difference betweene lands in fee-simple and lands tailed in regard of possession for the possession of a brother of an estate taile as heire to his father shall not make the sister to be heire but it shall descend to the younger son of the halfe venter for he ought to have it per formam doni Ployd f. 57. a. And if a Bastard eigne abare in fee-simple land after the death of the father and dieth seised without interruption and his issue enter he shall hold it and the right of the mulier puisne and his heires are bound for ever Ployd ibidem So if a woman seised in fee consent to a ravishor and the daughter which is proxima de sanguine next of blood doth enter there the son after borne shall not take away the title and possession of the daughter So where a
words contrary to the simple intent as Tully saith in his Offices is calumnia quaedam ninis callida malitiosa Juris interpretatio ex quo illud summum jus summa injuria a kind of a calumny and malitious interpretation of the law from whence that saying proceeded the rigor of right is the extremity of injury As he putteth the example of one had made a truce for 130. daies with his enemy and in the night he plundered and depopulated his possessions because he said the truce was for daies and not for the nights which Cicero accounteth meere injury and injustice and admonisheth men to avoid the like interpretation of the law and to observe the intent of the words and certainly words are but testimonialls of the intent and therefore Ployd f. 107. b. It is said it is the offices of Judges to take and expound the words as the common people doe use them to express their intent according to their intent As a Lease was made for life and that after his decease the tenements redibunt to a stranger it shall be taken as a remanebunt because to that purpose it was there used and therefore by 18. E. 3. f. 28. It shall be taken by way of remainder So a lease for life the reversion to a stranger shall be taken as a remainder for the reason abovesaid 30. M. 1. ante 157. vide ibidem plura in Hills case And so Ployd f. 291. a. Where a covenant cannot be performed according to the words it shall be performed according to the intent as neere as may bee as in the case of Littleton where a man maketh a feoffment upon condition that the feoffee shall make an estate in speciall taile to the Feoffor and his wife and the heires of their bodies if the Baron dieth before the estate made the estate shall be made as neere to the condition as may be to wit to the feme for life without impeachment of wast the remainder to the issues in taile according to the first limitation and if the feme be dead then the feoffee ought to give the lands to the issues and the heires of the bodie of his father and his mother engendred If the words be performed and not the intent the agreement is not performed Ployd f. 291. b. according to the rule of the civill law leges non ex verbis sed ex mente sunt intelligendae lawes are not to be understood and construed by the words but by sense and meaning of the parties as where the Defendant was obliged upon condition that if his feoffees of his Mannor of W. should grant to the Plaintiff an annuall rent of forty shillings out of the said Mannor that then c. and he had three feoffees and two of them granted to the Plaintiff the rent There the words of the condition were performed for the feoffees had granted the rent and yet he had not performed the condition for all the Justices there held that all the feoffees ought to have granted the rent and so it should be sure for there the third might have the land by survivor and he might avoid the rent and also more then two parts of the Mannor were not charged with the rent and so the intent is not performed though the words be M. 22. H. 6. f. 10. So if a man be bound to enfeoff me of the Mannor of D. and he maketh a feoffment ro another of parcell of it and then enfeoffeth me of the Mannor he hath performed the words but yet he hath not performed the intent which was that I should have had all the Mannor as it then was H. 3. H. 7. 4. So a remainder was limited to B. Si ipse vellet in-habitare residens esse if he would dwell and bee resident on the land during the terme there it is taken that if he was resident one week during the terme he had performed the words of the condition but not the intent for the intent was that hee should be resident all the terme 4. E. 6. ante 23. So an Abbot was Parson Emparsonee of a time c. and he had annuity for the time of which no memory runneth in right of the Parsonage and he as Abbot without naming himselfe Parson brought a Writ of annuity and counteth upon a prescription in him and his predecessors Abbots and the prescription traversed and found for the Plaintiff there every word of the Verdict is true and yet attaint lay against the Jury because he brought the Writ in the name of the Abbey and so claimed the annuity whereas he was not seised by that forme but as Parson and for that he did not claime as Parson they ought not to have found the issue with him and so the words of the Verdict and the intent of the Verdict did not agree in one M. 10. E. 4. f. 16. Ibidem in Chapmans case It is not requisite alwaies that the agreement shall be performed according to words because the intent is performed which is the principall point of the agreement Ployd f. 295. a. b As if a man be bound to pay a lesser summe upon a day certaine if I pay the summe before the day the condition is performed H. 10. H. 7. 24. So if the condition be in a Mortgage that I pay the money at such a place if I shall pay it at another place and the Mortgage accept of it it is well enough for the value is the effect So if a feoffment be made upon condition that if the feoffee doe not pay the Feoffor such a summe at such a day that then the feoffor shall enter If the feoffee before the day make a feoffment over and at the day doth not pay the summe there the second feoffee at the day may tender and pay the summe though the agreement was no other but that the first feoffee shall pay the summe Litt. vide ib. plura If a man make a feoffment on condition to enfeoff two in fee at such a time and before the time one dieth the feoffment ought to be made to the survivor and his heires onely for the intent which appeareth in the condition Ployd f. 345. 4. H. 7. f. 127. Every one who groundeth an Act with discretion hath an intention in the inception and neither beginneth any thing but to some end and in the progression hath the same intent and so in the consummation so as the same intention is the cause of every part and therefore the intention is principally respected in all humane acts and especially in those which concerne the disposition of our estates and in feoffments and grants A feoffment by deed of a Mannor with an advowson appendant and no livery made the advowson passeth not yet an advowson may pass without livery but the intention and the meaning was that the Mannor and it should pass together Finch Nomot 58. A bargaine and sale of Land and a reversion by deed not enrolled the reversion passeth
the Deed or writing it shall not bind the party that delivered it for it is at the perill of the party to whom the writing is made that the true purport effect of the writing be declared if the party that shall deliver the writing doth require it but if the party who shall deliver the writing doth not require it he shall be bound by the Deed though it shall be contrary to his meaning and it mattereth not though a meere stranger readeth the writing which is well proved by the usuall forme of pleading in such case to wit that he was a Lay-man and not lettered and that the Deed was read to him in other words c. generally without shewing by whom it was read Coke l. 2. Thorowgoods case f. 11. b. If a disseisor dye seised the Disseissee being within age Covert Baron in Prison or out of the Realme it shall be no descent to take away the entry Finch Nomot f. 26. In omnibus fere minori atati succurritur Coke l. 9. 84. In all cases for the most part there is favour shewed to them within age As In a writ of customes and services which is in the nature of a writ of right in which finall judgement shall be given against an infant who is in by descent in 6. H. 3. Tit. page 144. It is adjudged he shall have his age so in a Cessavit against an infant who hath the tenancy by descent he shall have his age though it be upon his own cesser because he cannot know what arrearages he shall tender before judgement and that also is in the nature of a writ of right for if he make not true tender he shall lose his Land 28. E. 3. 99. But in a per quae servitia against an infant who hath the tenancy by descent he shall not have his age because he hath benefit and availe over and above the Premisses and therefore is he called tenant paravaile and it is against reason that when the heire hath profit by the tenancy that he shall not pay annuall rent and it is no mischeife unto him for notwithstanding his Attornement within age he may at his full age disclaime to hold of him or to acknowledge that he holdeth of him by lesser or other services Coke ibidem And regularly it is true that an infant may doe any thing for his own advantage and not to his prejudice as to be an Executor or to purchase without the consent of any other for it is intended his benefit and at his full age he may either agree thereunto or perfect it or without any cause alledged waive or disagree to the purchase and so may his heire if he doth not agree at his full age Coke com f. 2. b. In a writ of mesne the proceedings shall not be stayed for the nonage of the infant because it is not reason that the infant shall be distrained for the services of the mesne during his nonage and shall not have remedy untill he is at full age Coke l. 9. f. 85. a. If an infant make a Feoffment in person if he dye without heire the Land shall not escheate but otherwise it is if it be by letter of Attorny Dyer f. 10. Coke l. 4. f. 125. a. An infant shall sue by procheine amy but defend by guardian Coke com f. 135. a. If an infant buyeth Lands in fee with the mony for which he did sell his own Land yet may he avoid his own alienation Doct. Stud 21. An Execution Elegit and Statute Merchant c. shall not be sued against the heire during his infancy Coke com 290. a. An infant shall avoid matters in faite either within age or of full age but matters of Record as Statutes c. acknowledged by him a fine levied by him or recovery against him by default in a reall action must be avoided by him during his minority to wit Statute by Audita querela and the fine and recovery by a writ of error because they are judiciall acts and taken by a Court or a Judge and therefore the nonage of the party to avoid the same shall be tryed by inspection of Judges and not by the Country and because his nonage must be tryed by inspection this cannot be done at his full age but if that age be inspected by the Judges and recorded that he is within age albeit he come of full age before the reversall yet may it be reversed after his full age Coke com f. 380. b. The Law doth provide for the safety of a mans or womans estate that before the age of twenty one years they cannot alien any Lands Goods or Chattells or bind themselves by deed Coke com f. 171. b. Unlesse it be for necessary meate drink and apparrell necessary physick and such other necessaries and likewise for his good teaching and instruction whereby he may profit himselfe afterwards but it must be pro necâ—ssario vestitu for convenient apparrell and not for Gold lace 11. H 7. and ought to be suitable to his calling Popham Rep. f. 152. But if he bind himselfe in an obligation or other writing with a penalty for the payment of any of these the obligation shall not bind him also all other things of necessity shall bind him as presentation to a benefice for otherwise the lapse should incurr against him Also if an infant be Executor upon payment of any debt due to the Testator he may make an acquittance and in that case a release without payment is void ibidem f. 172. a. If a man inheritor taketh wife who have issue a Son between them and the Father dyeth and the son entreth into the land and endoweth the mother and then the mother alieneth that which she hath in dower to another in fee with warranty and then dyeth and the warranty descendeth to the Son this warranty collaterall shal bar the Son Little but if the Heir be within age at the time of the descent of the warranty he may enter and avoid the estate either within age or at any time after his full age but if he within age at the time of the alienation with warranty and become of full age before the descent of the warranty the warranty shall barr him for ever Coke com f. 380. b. Though no laches shall be adjudged in an infant in case of descent as Littleton saith yet in some other cases laches shall prejudice an infant as laches shall be adjudged in an infant if he present not to a Church within six months for the Law respecteth more the priviledge of the Church that the cure be served then the priviledge of he infant so the publicK repose of the Realme shall be preferred before the priviledge of infancy in the case of a fine where the fine beginneth in the time of the Ancestor As if a fine be levied before the act of non-claime and one of full age had right at the time of the time levied and dyeth within the
flyeth to the wall or to some other unpassable place to save his life and upon the pursuit of the other he killeth him this is man-slaughter in his own defence 3. E. 3.284 From morall Philosophy NExt in order succeeedeth morall Philosophy the exact knowledge of which as Picolonomy Inductio ad libros Civil Philos cap. 6. cannot be comprehended without the precognition of the naturall and therefore hath the precedency for the morall faculty doth instruct men to avoid vices and to cure the maladies of the mind which cannot be compleatly accomplished without the naturall contemplation of the affections of the soul it is called Ethica by the Phylosopher or institutions of manners by which the oblique manners of men are rectified and their Enormities regulated and certainly from such exorbitances of manners originally proceeded the institutions of Lawes and from whence as Doderidge all Laws are in generalty derived for in the primary age which may rather be named the Iron then the golden age when men lived like beasts Dod. English Lawyer f. 250. the one praying on the other according to the censure of the Philosophicall Poet. Quod praedae obtulerat fortuna cuique ferebat Sponte sibi quisque valere vivere doctus What fortune offered for a pray each one Layd claime to it learned to live alone And serve himselfe Then were Laws first excogitated to suppresse the barbarous Savageness of such humane beasts and to reduce them to a more civill association as the Venusine Poet rightly Jura inventa metu injusti fateare necesse est Tempora si fastosque velis evolvere mundi If we revolve the Annalls of mans time From the worlds birth we must confesse and find That Laws were founded for feare of the unjust Seeing then Laws were introduced from the depraved judgements and corrupt manners of men who will not acknowledge that the science by which they are formed and the principles deduced from it are requisite and materiall to the fundamentall knowledge of the Law From which Fountaine our Law doth draw these grounds and maximes Illud possumus quod jure possumus Reg. I.C. We can doe that which by right we can doe for as Boetius potentia non est nisi ad bonum ability and power is not but to good for the power to have liberty to doe wrong is not by such liberty augmented but diminished potentia injuriae est impotentia naturae the power to doe injury is the impotency of nature as to decay and dye is no power but in respect of the privation and diminution in the thing is rather impotency as the Angells and Saints confirmed in glory and cannot sin are more powerfull then man who through his impotency can sin So a King ruling royally and with whom whatsoever shall please him hath the power of a Law and may doe what evill he lift is more impotent then he that doth all according to the rule and square of Law and therefore doth the Law give this rule Illud Rex solum potest quod de jure potest Coke l. 3. 99. f. 123. l. 1. 11. f. 7. Solum Rex hoc non potest quod non potest injuste agere The King onely can doe that which by right he can doe and the King can onely not doe this that he cannot doe any thing unjustly as 4. E. 4. 15. the King can be no disseisor he can be no wrong doer so if the King granterh and releaseth the services to the tenant and his heires that shall not extinct the tenure in all for necessity of the tenure and the King cannot by his charter alter the Law and therefore it shall be expounded as neere to the intention of the King as may be and that is to extinguish all the services but it onely which is incident inseperably to every tenure and that is fealty for it the King cannot doe by Law Coke l. 9. f. 123. a. And Coke l. 11. f. 72. a. The King shall not be exempt by construction of Law out of the generall words of Acts made to suppresse wrong because he is the Fountaine of Justice and common right and the King being Gods Lievtenant cannot doe wrong and with it accordeth 13. E. 4. 8. in the case of Alton woods l. 1. f. 41. So Lands were given to Henry the seventh and the heires males of his body and the question was whether the King in regard that he was not expresly restrained by the Act of 13. E. 3. de donis conditionalibus post prolem masculam sussitatum might alien or no and it was adjudged he could not alien but was restrained by the said Act for it were an hard argument to grant that the Statute which restraineth men to doe wrong and evill shall permit liberty to the King to doe it Ployd f. 246. Signior Barklys case Coke ibidem vide plura Potestas regis juris est non in juriae cum sit author juris non debet inde injuriarum masci occasio unde jura mascuntur Bract. l. 2. The Kings power is of right and not injury and as he is the author of right there ought not from thence to arise occasion of injury from whence rights proceed As if one who intendeth to sell his Land and by fraude conveyed it by deed enrolled to the King to the intent to deceive the purchaser and then he selleth the Land to another for a valuable consideration maketh conveyance accordingly in this case the purchaser shal enjoy the land against the Queen by the Statute of 27. Eliz. c. 4. For though the Queen be not excepted yet the act being general made in suppressing of fraud shall bind the Queen So if tenant in tail be seised of Land the remainder over in tail or in fee and he in the remainder knowing that tenant in tail will alien the Land and by recovery bar his remainder to the intent to deprive the tenant in tail of his birth-right and power that the Law hath given him to bar the remainder and of intent and purpose to deceive the purchaser granteth his reversion to the Queen by deed enrolled and then tenant in tail for a valuable consideration alieneth the Land by common recovery and dyeth without issue the purchaser shall enjoy the Land against the Queene by the Statute of 27. Eliz. the words of which are that every conveyance c. made c. to the intent and of purpose to deceive a purchaser t. shal be deemed onely against such purchaser c. to be utterly void vide ibidem plura in Magdalen Colledges case l. 2. in Cholmlys case f. 51.52 And the King hath a prerogative above all his Subjects that where by fraude or salse suggestion he is deceived that he in that case shall avoid his owne grant jure regio 22. E. 3. 47. in the Earle of Kents case Stanf. pr. regis 84. a. As the King can neither doe himselfe injury nor others And
it shall be apportioned vide ibidem plura If a man be bound to appeare at a day before Justices at which day the obligor casteth him into Prison so as he cannot come the bond is saved otherwise if he were in Prison for Felony or any other misdemeanor for that is his own act and fault 32. H. 6. Bar 60. Or if he cast himselfe into Prison Nâ—y Max. f. 13. An infants appeale shall not stay for his full age for he shall not take advantage of his own wrong 27. H. 8. 11. One in Execution escapeth and the Goaler taketh him againe the party if he will may have him to remaine in Prison in execution for him still for the escape is his own wrong 13. H. 7. 1. So Coke l. 3. in Britons case If one in Prison upon execution escape if he be taken he shall not bring an Audita querela to discharge himselfe of his imprisonment for he shall not take advantage of his own wrong He that is party to a wrong shall not take advantage by the same wrong Perk. 41. b. As if Lessor and Lessee for yeares joyne in the cutting downe of twenty Oakes the Lessor shall not punish him in a Writ of Wast and take advantage of his own wrong The heire which is party to the death of his Father shall not have an appeale of it And if issue in taile disseise the Discontinuee of his Father and then enfeoff his Father and his Father then dyeth seised and the issue in tail enter he shall not be remitted If Lessee for life of one Acre of Land leaseth the same Acre to his Lessor for yeares the remainder to a stranger in fee and maketh livery and seisin to the Lessor accordingly it is no forfeiture Perkins ib. If tenant for terme of life enfeoff the feme of the Lessor of the same Land leased and maketh a Letter of Attorny to the Lessor to make livery and seisin and he doth so accordingly it is no forfeiture Perk. ibidem f. 42. a. If an house fall down by tempest the Lessee for life or yeares hath a speciall interest to take Timber to reedify the same if he will for his habitation but if the Lessee pull down the house the lessor may take the Timber as parcell of his inheritance and besides have an action of Wast and recover treble damages Coke l. 4 f. 63. a. in Harlackendems case A deviseth lands to B. untill eight hundred pounds be levied for the marriage of his daughters his Son and Heire entreth and concealeth the will receiveth the profits before the will is discovered then the devisee entreth receiveth the profits until they amount to six hundred and forty pounds the heir is to supply the rent for the heire shall not take advantage of his own wrong Coke l. 4. Dormit Lex aliquando jus moritur nunquam Coke com 279. b. For as Littleton there hath it it is commonly said that a right cannot dye For of such an high estimation is right in the eye of the Law as that the Law preserveth it from death and destruction trodden it may be but not trodden out for where it hath been said that a release of right doth in some cases enure by way of extinguishment it is so to be understood as here Littleton saith in respect of him that maketh the release or else in respect by construction of Law it enureth not alone to him to whom it is made but to others also who be strangers to the release which as hath been sayd is a quality of an inheritance extinguished As if there be Lord and Tenant and the Tenant maketh a Lease for life the remainder in fee If the Lord release to the Tenant for life the rent is wholly extinguished and he in the remainder shall take benefit thereof and even so when the heire of a disseisor is disseised and the disseisor maketh a release for life the remainder in fee if the first disseisee release to the Tenant for life this shall enure by way of extinguishment because it shall enure to him in the remainder who is a stranger to the release and yet in truth the right is nor extinguished but followeth the possession to wit the tenant for life hath it during his time and he in the remainder to him and his heirs and the right of the Inheritance is in him in the remainder for a right to Land cannot dye or be extinct in deed and therefore if after the death of tenant for life the heire of the disseisor bring a Writ of right against him in the remainder and he joyne the Mise upon the meere right it shall be found for him because in Judgement of Law he hath by the said release the right of the Disseisee for it is commonly and truly said that right never dyeth but is transferred and conveyed by Feoffments Grants Confirmations Prescriptions or Fines c. releases from one man to another so as the Species of it continually remaineth Res inter alios acta alteri nocere non debet factum unius alteri nocere non debet Coke com f. 152. b Things acted among others ought not to hurt either and one mans deed ought not to hurt another and Coke l 9 f. 59. It is the rule of Law and reason prohibetur ne quis faciat in suo quod nocere possit in alieno sic utre tuo ut alienum non laedas it is forbidden least any one should doe that in his own that may hurt another and so use your own that you injure not another If a man hath a Water-course running in a channell of a River up to his house for his necessary ules and a Glover levy a Lime pit for Calve-skins and Sheep-skins so neer his Water-course that the corruption of the Lime pit hath corrupted it by which his tenants goe out of his house for it an action of the case lyeth as is adjudged in 13. H. 6. 26. b. So he who hath severall Piscaries in his own Water shall have an action of the case against him who erecteth a Dye-house by which he maketh slime filth and other dirty things to run out of the said house into the said Piscaries by which he hath totally lost the profit of the said Piscaries vide in the Book of Entries Nusance f 406. b. vide the same in Aldreds case for erecting of a Swine-house plura alia ibidem And so also in Penruddocks case Coke l. 5. and in Batius case l. 11. 54. Where you shall find diverse notable cases to the same purpose Lessee for yeares shall so take his hedge-boote that he doth not destroy common of Estovers which another man hath there 46. E. 3. 17. He which hath common in Land not inclosed shall keep his Cattle out of a stranges Land 20 E. 4. 11. If Beasts be driven by the high way he ought at his perill to keep them out of the Lands adjacent to the high way
stranger tendreth them mony for the Land and they intending to sell it more deere defer the sale for two yeares and take the profits themselves the heire for the laches and long delay may enter and put them out of the Land 38. Ass Pl. 3. 39. Ass Pl. 3. A man indebted by specialty or upon an account determined tendreth the mony to the Debtee after the day in which it was due and payable and it is refused and after mony is embased it seemeth to many that the debtor shall beare the losse although he had made tender at the very day of payment because he must say vncor prist Dyer f. 83. Pl. 76. Caveat Emptor Coke Com. f. 102. a. Let the the buyer be vigilant and wary what he buyeth for though by the Civill Law every man is bound to warrant the thing that he selleth and conveyeth yet the Common Law bindeth him nor unlesse there be a warranty either in Deed or in Law Ibi. Coke l. 4. f. 26. a. A Copy-holder who is out of possession ought not to sell his Land untill he hath gained the possession and if any one will purchase any title he is not to be favored but in such case Caveat Emptor let the buyer take heed for if any one hath a pretended right and title to Copy-hold Land bargaine and sell it to another it is within the Statute of 32. H. 8. c. 5. vide ibidem plura If I take an horse of another mans and sell him and the owner taketh him againe I may have an action of debt for the mony for the bargaine was perfect by the delivery of the horse Caveat Emptor Nay Max f. 94. If I sell my Horse to another man for ten hundred pounds who taketh his horse againe I shall have all the mony Ibidem f. 95. Qui timent caveant vitent Offi. of Exe. 251. They who feare are wary to shun dangers as an Executors office is dangerous and therefore ought to feare what encombrances fall on him and to keep goods to pay all debts if any should be concealed Non temere credere nervus est sapientiae Coke l. 5. f. 114. b. Not hastely to beleive is the sinew of wisdome and therefore the Law hath appointed the last time in the day to pay mony upon a condition that both parties may certainly meet together which is founded on the experience of the sages least any of the parties should be constrained to make a Letter of Attorny or repose confidence or trust in any other to pay it for him when he will doe it for himselfe And it is wisdome not rashly to trust any Caveat actor Reg. I. C. Let the actor beware what he doth One entreth into Bond to A. that he and A. shall stand to the Arbitrement of I. S. If A. refuse he him-himselfe shall take the forfeiture of the Bond. If a man have a Chappell which is his donation by Letters Patents and he presenteth me his clerk to the Ordinary he shal not make collation afterwards If a Parson impropriate presenteth one to a Church it maketh it disappropriate If he who holdeth his Land by homage and fealty taketh his Land of the King by office found that he holdeth it by forty shillings per annum he shall pay the rent hereafter Abundans cautela non nocet Coke l. 11 f. 6. b. An abundance of circumspection doth not hurt vide ibi Qui sentit onus sentire debet commodum Coke l. 1. f. 99. a. He who beareth the burden and taketh the paines ought to receive the profit as if a Feoffment be upon condition that if the Feoffor or his Heirs pay the sum of 20 l. or to doe any act before a certain day that they shall re-enter in this case if the father dye before the day of paymenr and the daughter for the safe-gard of the inheritance pay the mony or satisfieth the condition in this case the Son after borne shall not devest it for if the daughter had not performed the condition the Land had been utterly lost and therefore in this case a good argument may be made that the daughter shall detaine the Land for Qui sentit onus sentire debet Commodum ibidem vide Hobart Rrep fo 4. in Youngs and Radfords case Ployd f. 514. Trevilian was Tenant in tail of Tenements and he being only seised of such an estate a common recovery was had against him and Avice his wife who vouched over according to the course of common recoveries and it was found that the wife had nothing in the Tenements the husband dyeth the wife shall have nothing of the intended recompence in the case because she had nothing in the Tenements and so could lose nothing If Tenant for life or in Dower do devise the Corn growing on the ground upon the land at the time of their death this is a good Devise and he in the reversion shall not have it 4 H. 3. Devise 26. And the Statute of Merton which saith Omnes viduae possunt legare sua blada is but an affirmation of the common Law which was used in the time of H. 3. 19 H. 6. 6. A man seised of land in see in right of his wife leaseth the land to a stranger and the Lessee soweth the land and after the wife dyeth the Corn being not ripe the Lessee may devise the corn and yet his estate is determined 7 E. 3. 67. A man seised of land in the right of his wife and soweth it and deviseth the Corn growing on the ground and dyeth before it is severed the Devisee shall have it and not the wife 7. Ass pl. 19. One seised of lands in fee hath Issue a Daughter and dyeth his wife Privement Ensaint with a Son the Daughter entereth and soweth the land and before the severance a Son is born and his next friend entereth yet the Daughter may devise the Corn growing on the land If a Mannor be put in execution upon a Statute-merchant and the Conusee sow the land he may well devise the Corn growing on the ground Perkins f. 100. vide ibidem plura Qui sentit commodum sentire debet onus Cok. l. 5. f. 24. He that feeleth or reapeth the profit must bear the burthen and the charges A man leaseth an house by Indenture for years and the Lessee covenanteth for him and his Executors to repaire the house at all times necessary The Lessee assigneth it over to H. who suffereth it to decay the Lessee bringeth an action of Covenant against the Assignee and it was adjudged the action did lye in that the Lessee had taken upon him to bear the charges of reparation the annuall rent was the less which trenched to the benefit of the Assignee and he that enjoyeth the profit must bear the burthen and charges vide ibidem plura Co. l. 5. f. 100. a. The Statutes will have all those which are in perill and which are to take comodity by the
is an Accessary Ployd 175. But if it be to kill I. S. and he killeth I. D. mistaking him for I.S. then he is no accessary because it is different in substance And if I bid I. S. to steal such things out of an house without breaking of the house and yet he breaketh the house I am accessary to the Burglary But if a man bid one rob I. S. as he goeth to Sturbridge Faire and he rob him in his house he is not accessary for the variance is of substance Ployd ib. 175. Quando aliquid mandatur mandatur omne per quod pervenitur ad illud Coke l. 5. f. 115. b. when any thing is commanded every thing is commanded whereby we may come to it Whereas a Writ of Estrepment will lye in an action of Wast because he cannot receive more damages then are contained in the Count and can assign no Wast after the Writ purchased if a Writ of Estrepment commeth to the Sheriff by virtue of it he may resist those which will make waste and if otherwise he cannot yet it is lawfull for him to imprison them and to make Warrants to others to do the same and if it be necessary he may take a Posse commitatus for his aid though the words of the Writ onely be that he shall personally go to the Messuage and altogether take order that no wast or estrepment of the said Messuage be according to the foâ—m of the statute whilest the said plea hangeth indiscussed because when any thing is commanded every thing also is commanded by which we may come to it Quando aliquid prohibetur prohibetur id per quod pervenitur ad illud Col. 9. f. 57. a. then any thing is forbidden that also is forbidden by which we come to it As confederation and combination among men uniting themselves together either by obligation or by promise to execute any unlawfull act is punishable by Law before the unlawfull act be executed and the Law punisheth the combination and the confederacy to the end to prevent the unlawfull act and therefore the usuall commission of Oyer and Terminer giveth power to the Commissioners to enquire of all combinations confederacies and false allegiancies and false allegiance is a false binding of anyâ— one to another by Obligation or promise to execute an illoyall act Boni judicis est lites dirimeâ—e expedit reipub ut sit finis litium propter communem omnium utilitatem Coke l. 5. f. 73. b. It is the part of a good Judge to cut off strifes and it is profitable to a Common-weal that there be an end of Suits for the common good of all in Williams case When a Chappell is not private to the Lord and his Family but is publick and common to all the Tenants of the same Mannor who may be many and of great number there no action upon the case lieth against the Vicar who ought and is bound by prescription by himself or some other to celebrate Divine Service in his Chappell c. for then every one of his Tenants may also have an action upon the case as well as the Lord himself and so infinite actions for one default but it is the part of a good Judge to break and put of suits and strifes c. and it is profitable to the Common-wealth that there be an end of suits for otherwise great oppression may be under the colour and pretext of Law For as Coke l. 6 f. 9. a. If there should be no end of suits then a rich and malicious man will by actions and suits infinitely vex him who hath right and in the end because he cannot attain to any end compell him to redeem his charge and vexation and to leave and relinquish his right vide ibidem plura And therefore Coke l. 9. f. 73. b. Accords with satisfaction are much favoured in Law for the interest of the Common wealth that there may be an end of suits and Coke com f. 306 b. every plea ought to be tryable for without tryall the case will never come to an end which would be discommodious to the republick And therefore doth the Law shun circuity of actions and such actions as are needless and may be saved and as Coke l. 5 f. 31. Circuitus est evitandus As if he that hath ten pounds issuing out of certain land disseiseth the Tenant of the land In an assise brought by the Disseisee the Disseisor shall cut off the rent in the damages insomuch as if the mean profits of the land were at the value of thirteen pounds the Disseisee shall recover but three l. 3 H. 6. 18. and the Disseisor shall cut of all the damages he hath expended in repairing the houses 14 E. 3. 92. and if Rent-service happen during the Disseisin it shall be cut off 9 E. 3. 8. and the reason of the cutting off in such case is because that otherwise the arrearages of the rent-service charge or seck shall be revived and therefore to avoid cercuity of action the arrearages during the Disseisin shall be cut off in damages Coke com f. 265. a. If there be Father and Son and the Father be disseised and the Son living the Father releaseth to the Disseisor all his right which he hath or may have in the same Tenements without clause of Warranty and then the Father dieth the Son may lawfully enter upon the possession of the Disseisor because he had no right in the land in his Fathers life but the right descended to him after the release made yet if there had been a Warranty annexed to the release then the Son should be barred for the Warranty may rebutt and bar him and his Heires of a future right which was not in him at that time and the reason wherefore a Warranty shall bar a future right is for avoiding of circuit of action as he that made the Warranty should recover the land against the Ter-tenant and he by force of the Warranty to have as much in value against the same person ibidem Upon the grant of a Ward with Warranty the Defendant in a Writ of right of Ward may rebutt the Plaintiff by that Warranty and shall not be driven to bring an action of Covenant for avoiding circuit of action Finch f. 55. In an action of Waste upon a lease of yeares by Deed and in the same Deed the Lessor granteth to the Lessee that he shall not be impeached of waste the Lessee may plead this in an action of waste and shall not be driven to bring an action of Covenant for avoiding circuit of action When a Father enfeoffeth his Son and Heir with Warranty and dieth now the Son in a Praecipe brought against him may vouch the Feoffor of his Father for the Law will not suffer him to vouch himself and when he cometh in as Voucher then to deigne the Warranty for the circuity of Voucher Malificia non debent manere impunita impunitas continuum
when we apprehend the reason of the Law that is when we bring the reason of the Law to our own reason that we may perfectly understand in as our own ibidem and therefore we use to say in argument that reason will that such a thing be done or that reason will not that such a thing be done Noy max. f. 1. for as Ployd f 34. our Law hath reasonable constructions in all things As if I be bound to perform the Covenants in such an Indenture it shall be intended all the Covenants or that my Feoffees shall make an Estate it shall be intended all my Feoffees Lex est summa ratio Coke com 97. b. the Law is the chiefest reason that is an artificiall and legall reason warranted by authority in Law ibid. 62. a. and therefore Littleton saith Semper quaere de dubiis quia per rationes pervenitur ad legitimam rationem Alwaies enquire of doubts for by reason you shall come to a lawfull reason for reason is radius divini luminis and by the reasoning and debating of grave learned men the darkness of ignorance is expelled and by the light of legall reason the right is discerned and thereupon judgment given according to Law which is the perfection of reason Coke com f. 232. b. Nay the Common Law it self is nothing but reason which is to be understood of an artificiall perfection of reason gotten by long study observation and experience and not of every mans naturall reasons for Nemo nascitur artifex No man is born an Artist This legall reason is summa ratio And therefore if all the reason that is dispersed into so many severall heads were united into one yet could he not make such a Law as the Law of England is because by many successions of ages it hath been fined and refined by an infinite number of grave and learned men and by long experince grown to such a perfection as the old rule may be verified Neminen oportet esse sapientiorem legibus No man ought out of his own private person to be wiser then the Law which is the perfection of reason Co. com f. 97. b. And though the Jurisdiction of the Court of Parliament is so transcendent that it maketh enlargeth diminisheth repealeth and reviveth Lawes Statutes Acts and Ordinances concerning matters Ecclesiasticall Capitall Criminall Common Civill Martiall Maritine and the rest Coke comm f. 110. a. yet cannot a Parliament confirm any thing which is against Law and reason And therefore if a Town hath customes which are against Law and reason and their customes be confirmed by Parliament Danby chief Justice in such case saith M 5. E. 4. f. 40. 41. That such confirmation shall not extend to such customes For a thing used meerly against Law and reason is not custome notwithstanding the usage as the Law saith and therefore the Act of Parliament which confirmeth their customes is referred to that which is not for they are not customs and therefore shall be void Ployd f. 399. b. vide ibidem plura Quod est contra rationem est illicium Coke com f. 97. b. what is contrary to reason is unlawfull And therefore Tenant in Franck-marriage shall do fealty to the Lord before the 4th degree passed for it should be inconvenient and against reason that a man shall be Tenant of an an Estate of an Inheritance to another and yet the Lord shall receive no manner of service of him and therefore he shall do fealty for all service ibid. And all positive Lawes which are contrary to the Lawes of nature and the Law of reason lose their force and are no Lawes at all Such was that of the Aegyptians to turn weomen to Merchandizes and Common-wealth affaires and to keep men within doors And such was the Law of the Thracians who accounted stealing very commendable and idleness an honest thing Finch Nom. l. 75. Quod est inconveniens contra rationem non est permissum in lege Whatsoever is convenient and contrary to reason is not permitted in the Law Coke com 178. a. If a man be seised of lands in Fee-simple and hath issue two daughters and the eldest is married and the Father giveth parcell of the lands to the Baron with his Daughter in Franck-marriage and dieth seised of the remnant which are of the greater value by the year then those lands given in Frank-marriage In this case the Baron and the Feme shall have nothing for their pur-party of the said remnant unless they will put their lands given in Frank-marriage in hotch pot with their remnant of the land with the Sister And if they will not do so then the younger may hold and occupy the same remainder and take to her the profits only for if the other partner should have nothing of it is given in Frank marriage of this a thing would ensue an inconvenience and a thing against reason which the Law will not suffer and therefore if the Baron and Feme will not put their lands in Frank-marriage in hotch pot they shall have nothing of the remnant because it shall be intended by the Law that she is sufficiently advanced to which advancement she agreeth holdeth her self content Littleton ibidem Mutata legis ratione mutatar lex Coke l. 7. f. 7. The reason of the Law being changed the Law it self is changed As though by the Common Law a man cannot distrain for rent or service in the night 12 E. 3.17.11 H. 7.5 accord yet for damage-feasant a man may distrain in the night for the necessity of the case for otherwise peradventure he shall not distrain at all for before the day they may be taken or strayed out of the ground 10 E. 3. f 37. In the Statute of Winchester it is provided that in Cities or great Villages which are inclosed the gates ought to be shut from the setting of the Sun to the Sun rising and since that Statute if in such Village or City inclosed any murther or manslaughter be done in the day or in the night and the Offender escape such City or Village shall be amerced which Act changed the reason of the Law for at the common Law if a man was slain in the night and the Offender escape there it was not any default in the City and Village but now if they do not guard their Gates strongly according to the Statute by which the Offendor escapeth then it is a default and negligence in them 3 E. 3. tit Coronae 290. So if divers commit a robbery by the Statute of 13 E. 3. those of the hundred ought to apprehend all the Felons and though they apprehend any of them that is not sufficient to excuse them for the words of the Act are that they shall answer for the bodies of the Offenders but now by the Statute of 27 Eliz. c. 13. it is provided that none shall have an action upon the said statute if not that the party robbed so soon as he can
words in a condition shal be taken out of their proper sense ut res magis valeat quam pereat Coke com 213. a. If one giveth Lands to two and the heires of their two bodies ingendred the Donees have joynt estates for life and severall inheritances for if one of the Donees hath issue and dyeth the other shall have all by survivor during his life but if the Survivor hath issue and dyeth then the issue of the one shall have the one moiety and the issue of the other the other moiety of the Land and shall hold the Land together in common and the cause why they shall have severall inheritances is for that they cannot by any possibility have an heire between them engendred and when the grant is impossible to take effect by the letter there the Law shall-make such constâ—uction as the guift by possibility may take effect Co. 83. b. If Lessor of an house for twenty yeares maketh a Lease for two yeares rendring rent and after granteth all his terme and interest to another if the Lessee atturne the Reversion shall passe and if no Atturnement be had yet the ieterest in the Reversion shall passe so as the Grantee shall have the Land after the two yeares determined for the grant of one shall not be adjudged void if to any intent it may take effect Coke l. 4. f. 53. b. If a Termor grant his Terme Habendum immediate post mortem suam the Grantee shall have it presently ut res magis valeat quam periat Noy Max. f. 16. So if a man make a Lease for ten yeares and after for twenty yeares the latter shall be a good Lease for ten yeares after the first is expired Ibidem A release of all Actions against a Prior and Covent shall be construed all Actions against the Prior for an Action cannot be brought against the Covent Coke l. 1. f. 76. Gardiner and Bredons case Tenant for life of Land the Remainder in taile Tenant for life and he in the first Remainder in taile joyne in a fine sur conusans de droite come ceo c. to another in fee who granted a Rent charge of forty pounds to tenant for life it was agreed by all the Justices that the fine levied by tenant for life him in the first Remainder was no discontinuance of the first Remainder in taile nor of the second because every of them did only give that they may lawfully give and no forfeiture in the case be cause the law which abhorreth all wrong shal conster it first to be the grant of him in the Remainder in taile and then the grant of Tenant for life ut res magis valeat quam pereat but if a Feoffment had been made by word then it is the surrender of Tenant for life and the Feoffment of him in the Remainder Ibidem Coke l. 1. f. 45 a. In 2. R. 3. 4. it is holden by Starky and others that if the Patent of the King may be taken to two intents good then it shall be taken more beneficially for the King but if it may be taken to one intent good and to another intent void then it shall be taken to that intent to make the grant good and not to that intent to make it void ut res magis valeat c. vide ibidem plura in Alton Woods case Coke l. 5. f. 8. a. In Cessavit where the Tenure is alledged by Homage Fealty and Rent and the Demandant counteth that in doing the said services he did cease it shall be taken by construction to such services onely of which a man may cease 6. H. 7. 7. as of Rent and not of Homage and Fealty and the reason of this is ne res destruatur least the thing should perish vide ibidem plura Ployd f. 197. b. Anthony Browne Justice said that it is an office of a Judge to expound the thing ut res magis valeat quam pereat and to make all parts of the Deed and intention of the parties also to agree together Coke l. 4. f. 4. If I grant to you that you and your heires shall distraine for a rent of forty shillings to wit within my Mannor of S. that by construction of Law shall amount to a grant of a Rent out of my Mannor of S. for if it shall not amount to a grant of a rent the grant would be of little force or effect if the Grantee shall not have but a nude distresse and no rent in him for then he shall never have an Assize of it and for that reason it hath been often times ruled that it shall amount to the grant of a Rent by construction of Law ut res magis valeat 3. E. 3. 12. c. Benedicta est expositio quando res redimitur a destructione Coke l. 4. f. 25. b. Blessed is the exposition when the thing is redeemed from destruction every Mannor which consisteth of Frank-tenements and Copy-holders hath two severall Courts the Court of Frank-tenements wherein the Suitors are Judges and is called the Court Baron and the Court of Copy-holders wherein the Lord or Steward of the Mannor are Judges and if all the Tenements escheate or the Lord release the tenure and service of his Frank-tenements yet the Lord may hold his Court of Copy-holds and make admittance and grant of them ne res destruatur it is a ground in Law verba debent intelligi ut aliquid operetur Coke l. 8. f. 24 words must so be understood that they must worke some thing and not be idle and frivolous in Edward Foxes case wherein it was resolved that a demise and grant upon consideration of fifty pound for ninty nine yeares amounted to a bargaine and sale for the said yeares for when a Frank tenement or tenement passeth by Deed indented and inrolled it is not necessary to have those precise words of bargaine and sale but words which amount to so much are sufficient as if a man covenant in consideration of mony to stand seised to the use of his Son in fee if the Deed be enrolled it is a good bargaine and sale and yet there are no words of a bargaine and sale but amount to as much Coke l. 7. f. 40. So if a man for mony alien and grant Land to one and his heires or in tail or for life by Deed indented and enrolled it shall amount to a bargaine and sale and the Land shall passe without any livery and seisin It is a ground in Law verba sunt accipienda cum effectu Coke l. 4. f. 51. a. b. Words are to be taken with effect as if a man hath in the right of his wife any estate in Fee-simple Fee-taile or for terme of life c. the Baron shall have all the arrerages as well before marriage as after the death of his wife by the Statute of 10. H. 6. 11. for though by the Common Law the Executors c. of the wife might have an Action
may have a Quare impedit against another if shee be disturbed of her presentment by turne so cannont Joyn-tenants or tenants in common F. N. B. 34 I. For equality of partition among Coparceners a rent granted shall be a Fee-simple without the word heires Coke com f. 10. a. Coke com 102. a. Homage ancestrell is a speciall Warranty in Law and the Lands generally which the Lord hath at the time of the Voucher shall be lyable to execution in value whether he hath them by descent or purchase but in the case of an expresse warranty the heire shall be charged onely with such Lands as he hath by descent from the same Ancestor so in this case Firmior potentior est operatio legis quam dispositio hominis Lease upon condition that if it happen that the Lessee make any wast in or upon the Premisses it shall be lawfull for the Lessor to re-enter and the Lessee suffereth the house to fall in default of covering and reparations Dyer and Wash said that the Lessor might re-enter for such wast is punishable by the statute of Gloucester for destructionem facere in domibus Dyer 281. b. and so it is if he suffer wast to be done by a stranger Doct. Stud. l. 2. c. 4. yet if the Tenant had been bound in an Obligation that he shall do no wast he shall not forfeit his Bond by the wast of a stranger for greater is the operation of the Law c. A man is seised of three Mannors of equall value and taketh a wife and she taketh one entire Mannor for her Dower which is charged with a rent she shall hold it charged otherwise it is if she had recovered her Dower by a Writ of Dower and had had a third part of each assigned to her Inutilis labor sine fructu non est effectus legis Non licet quod dispendio licet Sapiens incipit a fine Et lex non praecipit in utilia Coke com f. 127. b. The Law commandeth no vain chargeable and unprofitable things As a Villain by the Law shall not have an appeal of Mayhem against his Lord for in an appeal the Mayhem man shall onely recover damages and if the Villain in this case recovereth damages against his Lord and thereupon hath execution the Lord may take it that the Villain hath in execution from the Villain and so the recovery void inutilis labor stultus and unprofitable labour is foolish and idle which the Law prescribeth not Coke com f. 197. a. Tenants in Common of an Hawk and an Horse shall joyn in Assise for otherwise they would be without remedy for one of them cannot make his plaint in an Assise of the Moyety of an Hawk or Horse because the Law will never inforce a man to demand that which he cannot recover as the Moyety of an Hawk or an Horse or any other entire thing for Lex neminem cogit ad vana in utilia Coke com f. 319. b. If a Lease be made for term of life the remainder to another in tail the remainder over to the right Heirs of the Tenant for life and Tenant for life granteth his remainder in fee to another by his Deed the remainder shall presently pass without any Attornment for none can atturn but himself and it were in vain that he should atturn upon his own Grant for quod vanum est lex non requirit Coke l. 5. 84. a. Where a man is in custody of the Sheriff by process of Law and after another Writ is delivered to him to take the body of him who is in custody presently he is in his custody by force of the second Writ by judgment of Law although he make not an actuall arrest of him for to what purpose shall he be arrested of him who is and was before in his custody for the Law prescribeth no fruitless things Actus legis nemini facit injuriam Coke com 178. a The Act of Law doth injury to none As if the land out of which a rent-charge is granted be recovered by an elder Title and thereby the rent-charge is voided yet the Grantee shall have a Writ of Annuity because the rent-charge is avoided by course of Law So if Tenant for another mans life grant a rent-charge by Deed to one for one and twenty years Cestuy que use dieth the rent-charge is determined yet may the Grantee have during the years a Writ of Annuity for the arrearages incurred after the death of Cestuy que use because the rent-charge did determine by the act of God and course in Law which wrong no man ibid. Coke l. 5. f. 87. a. If the Defendant in debt dieth in execution the Plaintiff shall have a new execution by Elegit or Fieir facias because otherwise the Plaintiff should lose his debt without any default in him and the act of God and the act in Law will not prejudice any one Trewgrijard being a Burgess of the Parliament who was taken upon an Exigent post capias and yet upon his Writ of priviledge of Parliament the Sheriff let him go at large for the King and the Realm hath an interest in the body of every Subject and the Common-wealth shall be preferred yet the party of the Parliament may be taken in execution again after the Plaintiff shall not be prejudiced in his execution by the act of Law which doth no man wrong neither is the Sheriff chargeable because his Office consists chiefly in the execution and service of writs and is sworn to do it Dyer 60. Lex plus respicit acta sine verbis quam verba sine actis Coke l. 3. f. 26. The Law respecteth more acts without words then words without acts As at the Common Law if lands be given to Baron and Feme in taile or in fee and the Baron dieth there the Feme cannot devest the Frank-Tenement out of her by any verball waiver or disagreement in pais as if before any entry made by her she saith that she waiveth and altogether disagreeth to the said state and that she never will take or accept of it yet the Frank-tenement remaineth in her and she may enter when she pleaseth and waive it in Court of Record for the Law more respecteth Acts without words then words without Acts and therefore if she entreth and taketh the profits although she say nothing it is a good agreement in Law And so it is adjudged in Mich. 34 E. 1. Avowry 232. That if a man take a distress for one thing yet when he cometh in Court of Record he may make an Avowry for what thing he pleaseth a multo fortiori when a Frank-tenement is vested in him it cannot be devested by nude words in pais and with it accordeth 17 E 3. 6. 17. Where the Baron alieneth his lands and retaketh the estate to him and his wife in taile the Baron dieth the Lord of whom the land was holden by Knights-service supposing that the Baron died sole
generall words imply no certainty and with that accordeth 21. E. 4. If a man be bound to be nonsued in all Actions that he hath against him in the Common Bench he may say that he hath no action therein otherwise if the condition be particular to wit that he shall be non-sued in a Formedon c. so as that it appeareth that generall words imply no certainty neither do they conclude any person to say that he hath nothing there vide ibidem plura Cok. lib. 8.78 a. Bospols Case In an arbitrament when the submission is generall of all Actions and Demands c. that may well stand with the generality of the words that there was but one cause depending in controversy between them For generall speeches imply no certainty and the awaâ—d for one is good notwithstanding the generality of the words for though there were many matters in controversy yet if one onely was made known to the Arbitrator he may make an award of it For the Arbitrator is in place of a Judge and his office is to determine secundum alligata probata the duty of the parties which are greived and know their particular greifes is to make known the causes of controversy to the Arbitrator for they are privy to them and the Arbitrator is a stranger and every one is to do that which lyeth in his knowledge but when the condition is in speciall and with a proviso and condition that an award shall be made of the premises or words which amount to so much there the Arbitrator ought to make Arbitrement of all or else the award is void Generalibus semper specialia derogant Reg. f. c. Derg 180. Quando charta continet generalem clausulam posteaque descenâ—it ad verba specialia quae clausulae generali sunt consentanea interpretanda est charta secundum verba specialia f. 134. b. in Edward Althams Case Which rule is almost word for word put and agreed of by both parties In. 7. E. 3. f. 10. Margery Mortimers Case to wit where a Deede speaketh by general words and then descendeth to special words if the words special agree with the words general the deed shall be understood according to the words speciall As if a man grant a rent in the mannor of P. to be taken in an hundred Acres of Land parcell of that Mannor with a clause of distresse in those hundred Acres the Rent shall issue out of the hundred Acres onely and the generall words shall be construed according to the words speciall so if a man grant a Rent and go no further those generall words shall create an estate for life but if the Habâ—ndum be for years that shall qualify the words generall 7. E. 3. So if a man give Lands to one and his Heirs Habendum to him and the Heirs of his body He shall have onely an estate tayle and no fee expectant for the Habendum qualifieth the generall words precedent Ployd f. 541. a. A man maketh a Feoffment by Deede to one to have and to hold to him and his Heirs and if it happen that the feoffee dyeth without heire of his body that then the Land shall revert The generality of that gift to him and his Heires shall be corrected by the speciall branch after so as the Donee shall have but an estate tayle 13. R. 2. in Formedon Dyer 261. b. A man seised in fee deviseth all his Lands in one village and in one of the two Hamlets by name and there were two Hamlets in the said Village The opinion of divers Justices was that none of the Lands in the other Hamlet should passe for it is intendable that the intent and meaning of the devisor was that nothing more should passe then what he had expressed A. acknowledgeth a fine of the mannor of P. with an advowson and regrants the mannor with the Appurtenances the advowson shall not passe Temp. E. 1. F. title grants Ployd 173. b. If I give or lease all my Lands to one and stay there he shall have all my Lands in England but if I say further in the manner of Dale there it is now restrained but if the specialty limiteth a thing which is void and so appeareth it is otherwise as if I lease to one all my Lands in Dale which I have by descent of the part of my mother and in truth I have no Lands in Dale which I have by descent of the part of my mother if the Lessor have other Lands in Dale he shall not have those Ployd 160. a. A man giveth Lands to two Habendum to one for life and after his decease to the other and his Heirs the one shall have the entierly for his life onely notwithstanding the Joynture given in the Premisses by the better opinion in terme M. 8. E 3.427 Generalibus sempâ—r specialia insunt Reg. f. c. Specialls are alwayes contained in the generals and the universalls allwayes comprehend the particularâ— Ployd f. 68. a. The plurall number containeth the singular and more and therefore was it resolved by all the Judges That a pretensed right and title was within the penalty of the Statute of 32. H. 8. for the buying of pretensed rights and titles for pretensed rights and titles in the plurall number did containe a pretensed right and title in the singular number And whereas the Statute of 5 R. 2. c. 5. forbiddeth that none make entry into any Lands or Tenements unlesse in case where entry is given by the Law yet if one enter into a Tenement he shall be punished though the Statute speaketh in the plurall number and likewise whereas the Statute of 1. H. 5. speaketh of false Deeds in the plural number yet if one bring but one false Deed he shall be punished by the Statute as it is holden in many Bookes Ployd f. 467. b. The Statute of Gloucester giveth an Action of Waste against him which holdeth for years which is spoken in the plural number yet may it be taken for him which holdeth for a year or half a yeare vide ibidem plura Generalis clausula non porrigitur ad ea quae sunt specialiter comprehenfa Coke l. 8. 118. b. It is a ground and maxime in the Law that a generall clause is not extended to those things which are specially comprehended Doctor Bonhams Case by the Statutes of 10 14. H. 8. it was enactd that no man should exercise the faculty of Physike within the City of London or within seven miles of the said City unlesse he be admitted thereunto by the President and Colledge of the faculty of Physike and there is another speciall clause contained in the said Acts that any who evilly and not well exercise the said faculty c. shall be punished by Fine and imprisonment c. and it was adjudged that the said generall clause that none should exercise the said faculty of Physike unlesse he be admitted c shall not be extended to the speciall clause
proferentem accipienda sunt Bacon Eliz. f. 11. As if I demise omnes boscos meos in villa de Dale for years this passeth the soile 14. H. 8.28 H. 8. Dyer 17. And if I sowe my Land with Corne and let it for for yeares the Corne passeth to my Lessee And if I grant ten pounds rent to Baron and Feme and if the Baron dye the Feme shall have three pounds rent because these words rest ambiguous whether I intend three pounds by way of addition or three pounds by way of deduction out of the rent of ten pounds it shall be taken strongest against me that it is three pounds addition to the ten pound of which more hereafter So Coke fol. 303. b. Ambiguum placitum interpretari debet contra proferentem An ambiguous Plea shall be taken strongest against the pleader for every one is presumed to make the best of his own Case and Coke l. 10. f. 50. Ambigua responfio contra proferentem est accipienda the Bishop of Sarums Case vide ibidem In obscuris secundum magis similius est judicandum vel quod plerumque inspici solet Regula I. C. and Coke l. 4.13 14. Sensus verborum ex causa dicendi accipiendus est sermones semper accipiendi secundum subjectam materiam In obscure and dark sayings we are to judge according to that which is most likely and which is wont to be and the sense of the words is to be collected from the cause of the speech and to be taken according to the subject of the matter which rule seemeth to qualify and moderate the other two vide ibidem S. Cromwells Case as first in words the Plaintiff bringeth an action upon the case for calling of him Murderer to which the Defendant said that as he was speaking with the Plaintiff concerning unlawfull hunting the Plaintiff confessed that he had killed diverse Hares with Engins to which the Defendant answered that he was a murtherer innuendo a murtherer of Hares and it was resolved that the justification was good for upon an action of slander the likeliest sense of words is to be taken and collected out of the occasion of the speech Coke ibidem And so in Deeds as if I have a free Warren in my land and let my Land for life not mentioning the Warren yet the Lessee by implication shall have the Warren 32. H. 6. which is the more likely meaning for otherwise the Lessor would have excepted the Warren Vnivocum denoteth words of a certaine and distinct signification and expresseth the thing cleerly without any obscurity or Ambiguity of which the Law taketh especiall notice for that certainty in all contracts and conveyances is the cause of quiet and setlement of estates but incertainty is the author of variance and dissention from whence we have these notable grounds and maximes Misera est servitus ubi jus est vagum Coke l. 5. f. 42. a. God forbid that the inheritances of men should depend upon incertaines and it is a miserable servitude where the Law is wavering and therefore Ployd f. 28. a. In every Common-wealth it is necessary and requisite that things should bee certainely conveyed for certainty engendreth repose and incertainty contention The occasions of which contention our Law foreseeing hath prevented and therefore ordained that certaine ceremonies should be used in the transmutation of things from one man to another and namely of Frank-tenements which are of greatest estimation in our lawes to know the certaine times when things do passe and therefore in every Feoffment the Law ordeineth that livery and seisin shall bee made and in every grant of a reversion or rents that attornement should be made which are points certaine containing time wherefore it is well observed by Sir Edward Coke in his Preface to the second part of his Reports that in all his time there have not beene moved in the Courts of Justice of England two questions touching the rights of descent escheats or the like fundamentall points of the common-Law so certaine sure and without question are the principles and grounds thereof That as Sir John Davis in his preface there is no art nor science which standeth upon discourse and reason which hath her Rules and Maxims so certaine and infallible and so little subject to diverse interpretations as the common Law of England Whence Sir Edw. Coke is bold to pronounce that the Common Law of England is not incertaine in the abstract but in the concrete and that the incertainty thereof is hominis vitium non professionis the imperfection of man and not of the profession and lib. 6. f. 43. a. in particular blameth hee the subtile inventions imaginations of men in the practise of uses which have introduced many mischiefs inconveniences contrary to the ancient common law which hath certain rules to direct the estates and inheritances of men and therefore is it without comparison better to have Estates and Inheritances directed by the certaine rule of the common Law which harh beene the ancient true and faithfull servant to this Common-wealth then by incertaine imaginations and conjectures of any of those new inventors of uses without any approved ground of law or reason Coke l. 6. f. 43. a. And therefore in all cases law and equity will that incertainty bee avoided as the author of contention and that there bee an end of all controversies according to equity and right which is the finall intention of all Lawes Coke l. 8. 53. And Coke l. 1. f. 85. a. The Judges ought to know the intention of the parties by certaine and sensible words which are agreeable and consonant to the rules of Law as if Land bee given by deed to two to have and to hold to them and haeredibus it is void for the insensibility and incertainty and though it hath a clause of warranty to them and their heires that shall not make the first wordes which are incertaine and insensible to bee of force and effect in Law although his intent appeareth but his intent ought to bee declared by words certain and consonant to Law So Coke comment f. 20. b. If a man letteth Lands to A. for life the remainder to B. in taile the remainder to C. in forma praedicta the remainder is void for the incertainty And therefore Ployd f. 272. a. giveth this ground that every contract sufficient to make a Lease for yeares ought to have certainty in three limitations in the beginning of the terme in the continuance and in the end of the same all which ought to be known at the beginning of the Lease and the Lease that wanteth them Mr. Brown said is but bibble babble vide ibidem Fullers case and Coke l. 6. f. 35. the Bishop of Bathes case Ployd f. 14. a. If I give all my mony in my purse to I. S. hee cannot have an action for it unlesse hee alledge the certainty of it so as without certainety the action is not maintainable according to
entred and after that a concord is made or a fine levied this is void in respect the verity appeareth on record for where the verity is apparent in the record the adverse party shall not be estopped to take advantage of the truth for he cannot be estopped to alleage the truth an impropriation is made after the death of the Incumbent to a Bishop and his successors the Bishop by indenture demiseth the parsonage for forty yeares to begin after the death of the incumbent the Deane and Chapter confirmeth it the incumbent dieth this demise shall not conclude because it appeareth that he had nothing in the appropriation till after the death of the incumbent ibid. Coke l. 10 f. 62. a. If a Bishop maketh a Lease of Lands for four lives and one of them dieth in his life so as now there be but three and after he dieth yet it shall not bind the successor for those things which have a bad beginning can scarcely be brought to a good end Ployd f. 344. a. If a Feme covert giveth Lands devisable by the common law by will and publish it and after the Baron dieth after the wife dieth the devise is void because the foundation is founded on the first parts to wit the making and publiâ—hing which are void though at the time of her death she was discovert but the death without a good beginning giveth no effect so if an infant maketh a Will and publish it and after is at full age it is not of effect causa qua supra ibidem Ployd f. 344. a. If one disseise one of two acres in Dale and the disseisee releaseth to the disseisor all his right he haâ—h in all the lands in Dale and delivereth the release as an escrowl to be delivered to the disseisor as his deed the last day of May before that time the disseisor diseiseth him of another acre in D. and after the deed is delivered to the disseisor the last day of May the right which hee hath in the third acre shall not pass for the beginning and the intent is to be respected in all acts So if one have a reversion in fee of two acres which I. S. holdeth for life and granteth to another the reversion of all the acres that I. S. holdeth for life and then the grantor purchaseth the reversion of another acre I. S. holdeth for life and after I. S. attorneth to the grantee for all the three acres the third acre shall not pass for the reason abovesaid If a man devise the manner of Dale or white acre Excepton and have nothing in it at the time of making the Will and after purchaseth it there it shall pass to the devisee for it shall be taken that his intent was to purchase it Ployd f. 344. a. If I let B. acre by deed indented in which I have nothing and I purchase it afterwardes it is a good Lease 8. f. 3. 24. F. n. b. f. 73. c. If a man be distrained in any liberty and he sue a replevin there by plaint or by Writ and after hanging the plaint in the Liberty he be distrained again for the same cause by the same person who distrained he shall not have a Writ of recaption because the plaint is not holden before the Sheriff c. nor before the Justices but if the plaint bee removed by pone and out of the Liberty before the Justices there the party shall have a Writ of recaption as well for the reprisall before the Writ as for the reprisall after whereas otherwise before the removal a recaption did not lie upon the reprisall of a distress in case a replevin was sued in a Mannor or Liberty and not in the County Coke l. 8. f. 78. a. Tenant in taile is the remainder in taile of the grant of the King if tenant in taile acknowledgeth a fine or suffereth a common recovery it shall not barre the issues because the reversion was in the King but if after the reversion be granted and put out of the crowne the fine shall bar the issues Coke com f. 14. a. Quod prius est dignius est qui pâ—ior est tempore potior est jure Eract l. 2. c. 10. and therefore among the males the eldest brother and his posterity descending from him shall inherit before any yonger brother because Littleton saith he is most worthy of blood and Bracton Siquis plures filios habuerit jus proprietatis primo descendit ad primogenitum eo quod inventus est primo in rerum natura whosoever hath many sons the right of propriety shall descend to the first borne in that hee first is found in the nature of things and in King Alfreds time Knights fees descended to the eldest son Glanvill l. 7. c. 3. vide ibidem plura Coke l. 4. Druties case f. 90. a. Though a Countess may have as many â—haplaines as she will by the Common Law yet by the statute can shee have but two capable of dispensation and reason requireth that he that hath served longest should be first preferred for he that is the former in time is the more worthy in Law Ployd f. 259. a. D. Hales case Baron and Feme are joyntenants of a Lease for two yeares there are no moieties between them but every of them hath the whole and if the husband charge the Land shee after her death shall avoid it 7. H. 6. f. 1. for she is remitted to the terme and is in upon a title parameunt the grant So if a man alien trees growing upon the ground entailed or in land which he hath in right of his wife and dieth before they are cut downe the alienee shall not fell them because the issue in taile is in upon a title paramount the alienâ—tion P. 18. E. 4. f. 5. 14. H. 4. f. 32. The Lord may take his Ward which is an apprentice out of the possession of his master because his title to his body accrueth in respect of his signiory which is more ancient than his apprentiship Ployd ibidem When one hath a presentment to a Church two turnes and another a third turne if he that hath the third turne bring a â—uare impedit he shall not begin with his owne turne first but with the other two turnes Vnumquodque principior um est sibimetipsi fides cum ea negantibus non est disputandum quia ad principia non est ratio Fortescue de laudibus legum Angl. f. 11. Dyer 271. a. There are principles of being so all causes are the principles of their effects and there are principles of knowledge so a proposition by which as the more knowen another is conceived is a principle and of this principle it is said That every principle is of credit to it selfe and that we ought not to dispute against denyers of principles As arrearages of Rent-charge being due to a woman sole and after shee taketh an husband and then another day of payment
amercement is pardoned vide ibidem The husband and wife make a lease by Deed the husband dyeth the wife accepteth the rent if the Lessee lose the Deed of the Lease the wife shall avoid it 15. E. 4. 17. Coke l. 1. f. 2. Buchuâ—sts case If the Feoffor make a Feoffment with warranty the Feoffee shall not have the Charters unlesse by expresse grant but the Feoffor shall have all the Charters and Evidences which are materiall for the maintenance of the title of the Land and upon which he may maintain his warranty paramount but if the warranty be determined he shall have them no longer Ployd f. 382. a. Nevills case The King grants to two for their lives and the life of the survivor of them the Sheriff-wike of Chester and one of them was attainted of high Treason all the Office was forfeited because the Office was entire and could not be severed ibidem The King granteth the Office of the keeper of a Parke to two and the one faileth in discharge of his duty the whole fee shall determine so it is if an annuity be granted to two for Counsell and one of them refuse because the Office and Grant is entire and cannot be severed and the cause ceasing but in one the whole annuity shall cease Exception Dyer 320. Pl. 13. An Arbitrement was between two of diverse things and among others there was one article that one party should have yearly for the space of six yeares twenty shillings toward the keeping and honest education of A. B. and A. B. dyeth before the fourth year of the sixth yeare yet the payment of the 20 s. shall not cease during the six years which is a certaine terme and is a duty to the party himselfe towards the finding of A. B. Dier 141. Pl. 44. King Ed. 6. granteth to the Lady Mary his Sister the Mannor of D. for terme of her life according to the Tenor and effect of the last Will of H. 8. which was that shee should have it so long as she was unmarried afterwards she granted a rent charge out of that Mannor after which grant K. E. dieth by whose death the reversion came to her being Queene and afterwards shee married Philip King c. and it was doubted whether the rent charge should remaine or no. Davis 3. a. b. In ancient times a great part of tenements were holden of their Lords by Socage which was that the Tenants ought to come with their sokes by certaine daies by the yeare to plow and sow the demesne of the Lords and because such workes were made for the livelyhood and sustenance of their Lords they were quitted of all other services and after such services were changed into monies by consent of the Lords though the Lords did alien their demesnes and had no lands to plow or sow yet payed they their rents yearely to the Lords so the Church and religious houses after the procuration of Victualls was reduced to a certaine sum did pay it to the Ordinary yearely though he made no visitation so as the rule The cause ceasing the effect also ceased held not in those cases So Coke l. 4. in Capels case it was resolved that where a man held certaine land by rent for Castle-guard though the Castle was ruined or decayed yet the rent remained and pro doth not import a condition as in the case of an annuity granted pro consilio impendendo but a full and perpetuall recompence and satisfaction Vide Davis plura ibidem In jure non remota sed proxima causa spectatur Bacon Max. f. 1. 2. In the Law the next and not the remote cause is respected For it were infinite for the law to judge of the cause of causes and therefore judgeth of acts by the immediate and next cause as Bar. Empsons case f. 2. An annuity is granted pro consitio seu impendendo and the grantee committeth treason whereby hee is imprisoned that the grantor cannot come unto him for counsell yet the annuity is not determined by this non fesans for the law looketh not on the remote cause to wit the grantors offence which was the cause of the imprisonment but excuseth it because his not giving of counsell was compulsory and not voluntary in regard of the imprisonment which was the immediate cause So if a parson maketh a Lease and be deprived or resigneth the successors shall avoid the Lease for the law regardeth not the cause of the deprivation or the resignation which is the act of the party but the act of the Ordinary in the admission of the new incumbent 2. H. 4. 3. 26. H. 8. 2. A foeffment in fee upon condition that the Feoffee shall enfeoff over and if the feoffee bee disseised and a dissent case and then the feoffee bindeth himselfe in a statute which statute is discharged before the recovery of the Land this is no breach of the condition because the land was never lyable to the statute and the possibility which was the remote cause that it should bee lyable upon the recovery the law doth not respect Coke l. 2. Winningtons case This rule faileth in covenous act where the law taketh heed to the corrupt beginning and also in criminall acts where the law principally regardeth the first motive vide ibidem plura Nihil magis consentaneum est us iisdem modis res dissolvatur quibus constituitur Reg. I.C. and Bracton Nihil tam conveniens est naturali aequitati unumquodque dissalvi eo ligamine quo ligatum est Cok. l. 2. f. 53. a. There is nothing more agreeing to naturall equity then that every thing should be dissolved by the same meanes it was bound As no estate can be vested in the King without matter of record so no estate can be devested out of him without matter of record Ployd f. 553. Walsinghams case and 180. Nevils case 12. H. 7. and many other bookes for nothing is so convenient to naturall equity then that every thing should be dissolved by the same band it was tied and Coke l. 4. f. 57. b. In case of attainder and office the King is entitled by double matter of record and therefore the party grieved ought to avoid it by double matter of record and not by single travers or Monstrans de droit but is driven to his petition vide ibidem plura But when a man avoideth the Kings title by as high a matter of record as the King claimeth though the King be entitled by double matter of Record he may have it by way of Plea as one is attainted of treason by Parliament an office findeth his lands by which the King seiseth them the party may alledge restitution by Parliament and a repeale of the former Act 4. H. 7. 7. b. Finch Nomot 12. Coke l. 5. f. 26. a. Indentures being made for declaring of the uses of a subsequent fine recovery or other assurance to certaine persons and within a certaine time and to certaine uses are but
kill her hushand part of which her husband and her Father having eaten were greivously sick whereof her Father complaining to the said Martin Martin stirring the electuary did eate part of it the one and twentieth of May and dyed the 22th of May and it was resolved that Agnes was guilty of the Murther of the said Martin for the Law conjoyneth the murtherous intention of Agnes in putting poyson into the electuary to kill her husband with the event that followed upon it to wit the death of the said Martin for the putting of poyson in the electuary was the cause of the poysoning and death of the said Martin was the event for that is the event which followeth the cause and are called events because they come from the cause and the stirring of the electuary by Martin without putting in the poyson by Agnes could not have been the cause of his death ibidem Frustra expectatur eventus cujus effectus nullus sequitur it is in vaine to expect the event where no effect followeth Coke l. 5 f. 15. b. Cawdrys case As if an excommunication under the Popes bull is not of force to disable any man in England and that if it being the extreame and finall end of any suite in the Court of Rome be not to be allowed in England it consequently followeth that by the antient common Law of England no suite for any cause though it be spirituall arising within this Realme ought to be determined in the Court of Rome for in vaine an event is to be expected of which no effect followeth and that the Bishops of England are the immediate Officers and Ministers to the Kings Courts ibidem Plus virium habent argumenta ex effectis Fons Log. Arguments from the effects are of greater force and therefore doth the Law commonly conster things according to the effects As if a Deed be delivered by an infant it cannot be delivered againe at his full age for it took some effect before and was but voydable 1. H. 6. 4. But a deed delivered by a Feme-covert or a release delivered to one who had nothing in the Land may be delivered againe to wit when shee cometh to be sole or the party to have somewhat in the Land for the first delivery was meerly void and of no effect at all From the whole and the part TOtum praefertur unicuique parti the whole is preferred before either part Coke l. 3. f. 41. in Ratcliffs case As the blood which is between every Heire and his Ancester maketh him Heire for without blood none can inherit and therefore it is great reason that he who hath the whole and entire blood shall inherit before him who hath but part of the blood of his Ancester because by the order of nature the whole is to be preferred before the part And therefore saith Bracton Proptâ—r jus sanguinis duplicatum dicitur haeires tam ex parte matris quam ex parte patris propinquior soror quum frater de alia uxore that from the double right of blood as well from the part of the father as from the part of the Mother the Sister is said to be the neerer heire then the brother of the other wife and Britton saith that the right of blood in this case maketh the Female to exclude the male ibidem And therefore by the common Law of England if a common person have issue a Son and a Daughter by one venter and a Son by another venter and dyeth seised of Lands in Fee-simple and the eldest Son entereth into the Land and dyeth without issue the Sister of the whole blood shall inherit to him and not the brother of the halfe blood Coke ibidem 40. b. Vbi major pars ibi totum where the major part is there is the whole 21. E. 4. 27. 14. H. 8. 27. The Deane and major part of the Chapter maketh the Croporation and their act is the act of the Corporation though the others doe not agree which accordeth with the rule of the Canon Law authoritas potestas capituli consistit in majore pare ejus saniâ—ri sic totum capitulum facere dicitur quod facit major sanior pars Panorâ—â—tanus The authority and power of a Chapter consisteth in the greater and sounder part and so the whole Chapter is said to doe what the major and sounder part doth But here this difference is to be taken that in Colledges and Corporations the major part of the Members ought to give their voices in a distinct number and not in a confused and incertaine number as in the election of the Knights of Parliament or the Coronors or Virderors in the County Court the greater voice and acclamation is sufficient to shew the assâ—nt of the greater part of the Free-holders who make the election Ployd 126. a. So as the major part of the Chapter doth consent in making this confirmation and this consent ought to be expressed by the fixing of the Seale 14. H. 6. 17. So ought they to sit in one place and at one time for otherwise it may be called an assent and not a consent where the lease ought to be confirmed by the assent and consent of the Deane and Chapter for as the body naturall cannot make any perfect act if it be dismembred no more can a body politique but the persons which are members of it ought to be capitulariter congregati in a certaine place otherwise if they be scattered or dispersed in severall places that which they doe shall not be said to be the Act of the Corporation but factum singulorum as 15. E. 4. 2. a. where the major part of the Monkes had subscribed their hands to a deed of the Abbot but it was not expressed that it was done with the assent and consent of the Covent it was said to be done by those particular persons which had subscribed and not by the Corporation and such a deed shall not bind the house yet the Deane and Chapter are not confined to their Chapter-house but they may meet to and make their Acts elsewhere and therefore it is holden 21. E. 4. 26 That where a Deed did beare date in domâ— capituli averrement might be that the deed was delivered at another place yet the major part ought to be present in the same place and therefore the election of Coroners ought to be in pleno comitatu as appeareth by the Writ de coronatore eligendo So the consent of the major part of the Chapter ought to be at the same time simul semel and not scatteringly and upon severall daies for it is not a consent unlesse it be simul for consensus est voluntas multoâ—um ad ques res pertinet simul juncta for consent is the will of many joyned together concerning those things which appertaine unto them Davis f. 48. vide ibidem plura Turpâ—s est pars quae cum suo toto non convenit It is a foule and deformed
part which agreeth not with the whole Ployd f. 161. a. And therefore every part of a deed ought to be conferred with the other and one entire sense thereupon to be made as if I release all actions and stay there all actions are gone but if I say further which I have as Executor to I. S. there the generality is restrained So 17. E. 4. f. 22. The King granteth to Garter King of Heralds ten pounds for the terme of his life if he had stayed there he had had it absolutely for terme of his life but where he faith further by reason of his Office by it hee hath restrained the generality vide ibidem plura in Throgmortons case so as if he be removed from his Office he shall lose his annuity Parte quacumque sublata integrante sive necessaria tollitur totum the substantiall or necessary part of any thing being taken away the whole is destroyed Coke l. 3. f 41. in Ratcliffs case As none can be procreated but of the father and the mother and ought to have in him their two bloods which bloods commixed in him by lawfull marriage constitutes and makes him heire so none can be heire to any unlesse he hath in him both the bloods to whom he shall be made heire and therefore the heire of the halfe blood shall not inherit because hee wanteth one of the bloods which make him inheritable for the blood of the father and mother are but one blood inheritable and both are necessary to the procreation of an heire and therefore if there be Baron and Feme Donees in speciall taile and the Baron is attainted of treason and executed having issue and the Feme die the issue shall not have the Land because the father is attainted for he ought in his lineall conveyance to make himselfe heire as well of the part of his father as of the part of his mother Dier f. 332. b. And that bar and forfeiture is made by the Statute of 26. H. 8. c. 13. which provideth that every offender convict of high treason shal forfeit to the King c. All his Lands c. saving to every person all his right title interest c. so as the issues in taile are barred by that statute because the heire is disabled and cannot make himselfe heire in his lineall convâ—yance as well to the father as mother Coke l. 9 f. 140. a. upon which reason Britton saith that if one be attainted of felony by judgement the heires engendred after the attainder shall bee excluded of all manner of succession of inheritance as well of the part of the father as of the part of the mother because at the time of the generation of him the fathers blood was corrupted et ex leproso parente leprosus generatur filius Coke l. 3. f. 41. vide plura From the circumstances of time and place MOmentum instans est unum indivisibile in tempore quod non est tempus neque pars temporis ad quod tamen partes temporis copulantur Ployd 110. b. The distinction of a moment cannot be discerned or observed in the actions of men who cannot doe any thing without the space of time yet as Ployd f. 258. b. in Madam Hales case in things of instant there is a priority of time in the consideration of the Law as in a felon of himselfe the forfeiture shall have no relation but to the time of his death and the death precedeth the forfeiture and notwithstanding the forfeiture commeth at the same instant when he dieth yet in consideration of Law one shall bee said to precede the other though both shall be said to come at an instant for every instant hath the end of one time and the commencement of another and so in the death of a Felon of himselfe the death and the forfeiture commeth together and at the same time and yet there is priority to wit the end of his life is the beginning of the forfeiture and yet the forfeiture is so neere the death that there is no meane time betweene them but are conjoyned for a moment or instant is one indivisible thing in time which is not time nor part of time to which notwithstanding the parts of time are conjoyned vide ibidem plura and in the case between Fulmasten and Steward fo 110. So Fulbeck in his Pandects L. 1. f. 9. b. The existence of a moment cannot possibly be discerned and therefore is not so much as the twinckling of an eye yet the Law doth operate without compass of time in an instant but man never for every act of man must have space longer or shorter but the nature of such instants as the law doth imagine is such and so suddaine that as the Civilians omnom respuunt moâ—am and the reason is because in the operation of the law that which is imagined to be done is dicto citius presently done and whereas the act of man is mixed with the act of Law though in regard of the same thing the act of Law is momentary yet the act of man must needs beare some delay as those things by the civill law which are taken from the enemies doe incontinently become his who doth seise and take them the law doth give them unto him presently yet there must be a time to take them that the Law may give them So if a Lease be made to A. for the life of B. and A. dyeth C. entreth into the Land and enjoyeth it as occupant the Law because it will not have the freehold in suspence doth imagine that it was presently and immediately in him after the death of A. and that he entred presently but if we respect the entry as the Act of man we must needs conceive that he had some time to enter into the Land and by his entry which is an act of motion to gaine the free hold ibidem Quae incontinenti fiunt in esse videntur Coke l. 8. f. 77. a. Those things which are done in an instant seeme to be in esse or in being in Staffords case as a particular estate and the increase of a particular estate ought to take effect by the same deed or grant or â—y two deeds delivery at the same time which is all one in effect for those things which are done in an instant and at the same time seeme to be in being And the particular estate and the increase of the estate upon it is but one grant to take effect out of the same root and though that it vesteth at severall times yet when it vesteth it hath the vigor and force of the same grant 27. H. 6. f. 7. So l. 2. f. 71. a. A condition cannot precede an estate but ought to be in the said conveyance or comprised in another deed delivered at one and the same time as the books are agreed in 17. Ass 2. and 34. Assise for the above said reason vide ibidem S. Cromwels case But Coke com f. 236. putteth
Plaintiff had a free Chase but he must prove it 10. E. 3. 20. Affirmativum negativum implicat Ployd f. 206. b. An affirmative includeth a negative for every statute limiting any thing to be in one forme although it be spoken in the affirmative yet it includeth in it selfe a negative as the statute of W. 2. c. 4. Of a quod ei deforceat giveth that the demandant shall vouch ac si tenens esset in priori bâ—eve includeth a negative to wit and not otherwise for it hath been taken since it that if the first writ was a Sciâ—e facias and the tenant in the Quod ei de forceat mainteineth the title of it the demandant shall not vouch for he shall vouch ac si tenens esset in priori breve which is as much as to say that he shall vouch ac si tenens esset in priore breve and in no other manner and then in the first writ it being a Scire facias he cannot vouch no more then now So the statute of W. 2. c. 11. Provideth that upon an account ended before auditors assigned and arrearages found upon the accountants they have power to send and deliver their bodies to the next Goale of the Lord the King in those parts and upon it is taken 27. H. 6. f. 8. That the auditor ought to commit him to the next Goale though it be in another County for they cannot vary from the place limited by the statute and is as much as if be had said and in no other Goale So the statute of W. 2. c. 3. giveth a Writ of second deliverance out of the Court where the first replevin was granted and a man cannot have it any where else for where the statute appointeth the place order and forme of suits then they cannot sue in any other place or any other forme if they should it shall be contrary to the purview of the statute So if tenant in taile make a feoffment to himself for life and after to the use of his issue in taile and dieth since the statute of 27. H. 8. The issue in taile shall not be remitted for the statute executed the possession in the same manner and forme as he had the use which is all one as if he should say and in no other manner and form and he had the use as a Purchaser and so he shall have the land here and not be remitted 2. M. 1. ante 114. vide ibidem plura From Division DIvisio est oratio qua totum in partes distinguiâ—ur a division is an oration by which the whole is divided into parts Argumentum a divisione est fortissimum Coke l. 6. f. 60. a. An Argument drawne from division is most strong as there are four sorts of commons common appendant common appurtenant in grosse and by reason of Vicinage but common residentiae commorationis of residence and dwelling is none of them therefore no common Res per divisionem melius aperiuntur Eract And the Civilians per divisionem melius materia intelligit by division things are more cleerely opened and by it the matter is the better undestood and therefore saith Plato speaking in the person of Socrates Si nactus fuisset autem qui bene partiri sciat se iâ—sias tanquam Dei vestigia consâ—cuturum esse if he had obtained a leader who knew well to divide he had followed him as the footsteps of God for by division the Clouds of confusion are cleered and the distinct and true nature of the thing manifested and as Lodovicus all falsehood proceedeth from conformation when through rudenesse we know not how to discerne confused things so as we are deceived with the like or things neare unto them Quae in partes dividi nequeunt solida a singulis praestant Coke l 6. f. 1. Those things which cannot be devided into parts ought wholly to be performed of every one As Lord and Tenant of three Acres of Lands by homage fealty and annuall service of a Spurrier and suit of Court if the Lord maketh a Feoffment in fee or one Acre the feoffee shall hold by homage fealty a spurrier and suit of Court by the common Law for those things which cannot bee devided shall entirely be perâ—ormed by every single person vide ibidem plura of which neverthelesse some certain ones are appointed by the statute to avoid trouble to bee performed by the eldest coheire for â—hâ— rest as homage Dod. 104. En. L. If an Ox be devised to one and the Ox dyeth without any default of the Executor whether is the Skin oâ— Hide of the Ox due to the Executor or the Devisee by the common Law the Devisee shall have the hide for it is parcell of the Ox and the Ox was an entire thing and cannot be divided but by the civill law the executor shall have it because the Ox did perish and was no Ox before the Skin was taken off but the skin was taken off from the Carcasse Fulb. 1. f. 45. b. Frustra sit per plura quod fieri potest per pauciâ—ro 9. H. 7. 24. Coke l. 8. f. 167. a. Division is a resolution of the whole into parts and ought to consist of as few parts as may be for it is vaine to doe that by more may be effected by fewer and therefore the Peripatericks approve a dicotomy or a two fold division non 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not that we should be restrained to make a division alwaies of two parts but that we may divide it into as many as the nature of the thing râ—quireth As Littleton divided rents into rent charge rent-service and rent-seck and very well because it was according to the severall nature of rents and so also did he divide warranties into lineal collaterall and comminenting by disseâ—sin so are actions devided into reall personall and mixt and also the division of fewer parts or more is to be admitted if the nature of the thing so devided doth requiâ—e it therfore were the Ramists so curious in their strict observing of a Dicotomy Coke l. 6. 167. a. If the King by his Patent reciting the estate taile doth grant the reversion and further granteth the lands in possession those severall grants in one Patent are as good and strong in law as if the King by one patent had recited the estate taile and granted the reversion and by another Patent had granted the Lands inpossession for vainly that is done by more which may be done by fewer Ploâ—d f. 191. b. If I release all the right I have in all my Lands in Dale which I have by descent of part of my father and I have no Lands dy descent of part of my father the release is void for he must aver that I had such Lands in Dale by descent of the part of my father But if the release had beene in white Acre of D. which I had by descent of part of my father and I haee no lands by descent of
disseisin the law is removed from land to land beyond these degrees which writ is given by the statute of Marlebridge c. 18. though before at the common law in respect of such long possession the demandant was driven to his writ of right vide ibidem plura Vis unita fortior Ployd f. 307. a. united force is more strong as in Sharingtons case There are three causes premised to make and raise uses in lands the first is his affection for the provision of his males the second is his affection that the lands he had should remaine in his blood the third is his Brotherly love he bore to his brother whereas every one of them had beene sufficient to raise uses yet when all are put together they are of the greater force for forces united are more strong Conjunctio maris feminae est de jure naturae Coke l. 7. f. 13. Arist 1. Polit. Nuptias non concubitus sed consensus facit Vlpian consensus non concubitus facit matrimonium Coke com f. 33. a. In matrimony there is a conjunction both of the bodies and the mindes and in contracting matrimony the consent of the mind obtaineth the chiefe and substantiall parts and corporall copulation the second and therefore is it said that the consent and not the copulation maketh the marriage for every denomination is from the greater and a woman by the common law cannot consent before she is of the age of twelve yeares nor a Man untill the age of fourteen yeares and these are called annos nubiles because at that age either of them may disagree from a former marriage Coke ibidem for a marriage infra annos nubiles underneath the marriageable yeares is inchoate and imperfect to all purposes except her dower and accordingly was it resolved in Ambrosa Gorges case Coke l. 6. f. 40. a. Who being married and her husband dying before she was of the age of ten yeares was notwithstanding the former marriage adjudged to be in ward to the Queen because the former marriage was no marriage before consent and they could not consent ante annos nubiles for the consent and not the copulation maketh the marriage And therefore is matrimony defined by Britton to be assemblee del home feme alieur deux volunts a conjunction of a man and woman according to both their wils f. 246. And which as Bracton saith l. 1. c. 5. fit per mutuam voluntatem for their mutuall consent is the efficient and necessary cause of marriage and therefore a marriage enforced contrary to the will of either party is unnaturall and illegall as Kelway 19. H. 7. 52. b. Where the case is that Margaret the now wife of Keble brought an action of trespasse against Vernon to which the defendant said that he heretofore at the Church of S. in the said county tooke the Plaintiff to wife and there were married according to the lawes of the Church and demanded judgement if action to which the Plaintiff said that those espousalls were made by menaces and duresse of imprisonment and against the will of the said Plaintiff in another county and prayed her damages and after great debate whether the espousalls were avoidable by duresse or no Frowick said that he had seen the bookes and that it seemed cleerely that the espousals were well avoided by duresse and the replication vide ibidem plura And which also seemeth to be the resolve and determination of all nations for for it Romulus himselfe was upbraided to wit for forcing the Sabine Virgins against their wils to marry the Romans and was declared by his successors the Roman Authors to be a barbarous act and a crime equivalent to a rape as Propertius l. 2. El. 6. Tu criminis author Nutritus duro Romule lacte lupae Tu rapere intactas docuisti impune Sabinas Thou hardy Romulus nurs'd by brutish care And Wolvish milk was so fierce to dare To snatch the Sabine Virgins from their Sires And force them to the nuptiall of their friendes desires A Savage crime unpunisht And by Virgill more fully Raptas sine more Sabinas That is ravished contrary to the custome of all nations for in that age when Rome most flourished the customes of the Romans were the lawes of all nations as Claudian l. 4. Stil Armorum legumque parens quae fundit in omnes Imperium primique dedit cunabula juris Rome by the power of Armes and lawes doth sway The spacious universe and did wisely lay The Plat-forme and the grounds of law and right And therefore not long after by the Romane civill law the consent of the espoused parties was ratified by an oath which being but a contract was called sponsalia de futuro which also in our law at this day is of great force for by it a precontract is a sufficient cause of divorce a vinculo matrimonii Coke com f. 285. a. Vir uxor sunt quasi unica persona quia caro una sanguis unus Cok com f. 187. b. The husband and wire are but one person in law Littleton because they are one flesh and one blood as the Scripture saith and as the Philosopher are by nature conjoyned As if a joynt estate be made to the husband and wife and to a third person the husband and wife shall have one moiety and the third person the other moiety because the husband and wife are but one person in law so if an estate be made to the husband and wife and to two others the husband and wife shall have but the third part Lit. If an estate be made to a villaine and his wife being free and to their heires they have severall capacities the villaine to purchase for the benefit of the Lord and the wife for her owne yet if the Lord of the Villaine enter and the wife survive she shall have the whole land because there was no moieties between them 40. Ass Pl. 7. If a woman marry with her obligor the debt is extinct and she shall never have action against the Obligor because the suit against her husband by inter marriage was suspended and therefore being a personall action and suspended against one it is discharged against both 21. H. 7. 29. h. So is it If a feme sole baile goods to one and marry with the bailee they are the bailees good so it is if the wife buy goods of one 33. E. 3. If husband and wife purchase lands to them and their heires and the hsband alien the land c. she shall recover the whole in a cui in vita after his death and the warranty of one of them or his Ancestors is a bar of the whole against them both 39. H. 6. 45. 21. R. 2. Judg. 63. And for the same reason the husband cannnot enfeoff the wife but upon a feoffment made unto her by a stranger he may deliver seisin unto her by a letter of attorney for thereby he giveth nothing himselfe Perk. 40. If a
feoffment be made to a man and a woman and their heirs with warranty and they inter marry and after are impleaded and recover in value moyeties shall not be between them for though they were sole when the warranty was made yet at the time when they recovered and had execution they were husband and wife at which time they cannot take by moyeties Ployd 483. Nichols case So if a reversion be granted to a man and a woman and their heires and before attornement they inter-marry and then attornement is made they in this case shall have no moieties No more if a Charter of feoffment be made to a man and a woman with a letter of Attorney to make livery and they inter-marry and then the livery is made secundum formam chartae they shall have no moiety Coke com f. 187. a. Although at the common law a man during the coverture could neither in possession reversion or remainder limit an estate to his wife yet a man now may by the statute o 27. H. 8 Covenant with others to stand seised to the use of his wife or make a feoffment or other conveyance to the use of his wife for by it the estate is executed to such uses for an use is but a trust and confidence which by such a meane may be limited by the husband to the wife but a man cannot covenant with his wife to stand seised to her use because they are one person in Law And if cesty que vie doth devise that his wife shall sell his land and make her Executrix and dyeth and she take another husband she may sell the land to her husband for she doth it in anter droit and her husband shall be in by the devisor Coke com f. 112. a. If a free man marry a woman which is a neife she shall be free for ever although the husband dyeth and she surviveth because they are but one person in law unlesse there be some speciall Act made by the wife afterwards as devorce or cognisance in Court of record F. N. B. f. 78. g. If an english man marry an alien borne she shall be a Denizen for the same reason Abri of Ass by Brooke Demzen Iâ— the husband and wife â—aile goods to one they shall not joyne in an Action of Detinue for it is the bailement of the husband onely and void as to her The husband may have an Action of trespasse for taking away his wife F. n. b. f. 53. b. A man may have an Action at the common law de muliere abducta cum bonis viri if she hath attained to the age of consent and hath actually consented to the marriage because it is not properly a marriage till she doth consent 13. E. 1. c. 35. Yet Brooke 4. 47. E. 3. trespasse f. 420. rather thinketh that it shall be intended a good marriage till she doth disâ—ssent but where the marriage is compleat though the wife is dead or divorced at the time of the Action brought the action is maintainable but the word rapuit must be in the writ as well as abduxit 43. E. 3. and therefore it will not lie against a woman because one woman cannot ravish another 43. E. 3. 23. Fulb. l. 1. f. 79. Hereupon it is that the wife can never answer in any Action without her husband and if upon an Action of trespasse the wife cometh in upon a cepi corpus and the husband doth not appeare she must be set at large without any mainprise till her husband doth appeare but he appearing may answer without her and therefore a protection cast by the husband serveth for the wife also Finch Nomot f. 41. If tenant in taile enfeoff a woman and die and his issue within age taketh her to wife he shall be remitted for he cannot sue a Formedon in this case unlesse he will sue against his wife because by the enter-marriage he is seised in her right ibid. Si mulier nobilis nupserit ignobili desinit esse nobilis Coke l. 6. f. 53. b. and l. 4. f. 118. b. If a noble woman marry an ignoble man she ceaseth to be noble as when a Barronesse marrieth under the degree of a Baron by such marriage her dignity is determined but that is to be understood of a woman hath attained her nobility by marriage of a Duke Countesse or Baron and if such an one marry with one is ignoble she loseth her dignity to which shee hath attained by the marriage with one of nobility but if a woman be noble by descent as a Dutchesse c. though she marry one under the degree of nobility yet her birth-right shall remaine for it is annexed to her blood and it is a Character indelebilis ibidem And if a Dutchesse marry with a Baron of the Realme she remaineth a Dutchesse and loseth not her name Coke com f. 16. b. Vir est caput mulieris Bracton Coke com 1 2. a. The husband is the head of the wife for God saith Ployd f. 305. hath divided reasonable creatures into two sexes male and female and the male is more soveraine and the female more base as Aristotle l. 1. Polit. Mas est praestantior deterior vero faemina and therefore doth the female change her sir name into the name of her husband and also men for the greater part are more reasonable then women and have more discretion to guide things then women have and therefore Aristotle in the same place saith mas ad principatum aptior est natura quam faemina the man is more apt by nature to rule then the woman and as the woman is not so apt to governe in high matters so is shee not in things of a lower degree and therefore saith Bracton l. 2. c. 15. Omnia quae sunt uxoris sunt ipsius viri non habet uxor potestatem sui sed vir all things which are the wifes are the husbands and the wife hath not power of her selfe but her husband for all personall things shee hath are meerly his and at his disposing and as the office of an executor f 210. are so setled in the husband upon the marriage as any other that were his own before so as if goods be given to a Feme-covert and another the joynture is severed and the husband and the other are tenants in common and the executor of the husband shall have all the goods that were given to the wife 21. H. 7. 29. All the reall Chattells of the wife are also the husbands for as Hoberd f. 4. Radfords case though the lease were at the first the wifes and that the husband was possessed in her right so as though he had purchased the Fee-simple the Lease had not been extinct yet by the inter-marriage he had full power to alien it and if he survive the wifâ— he is to enjoy it against her Executors or Administrators vide Ployd 191. But where the wife hath a terme for yeares the husband cannot devise it to another
by his Will or grant a rent-charge out of it for shee hath an estate in it before and at the time of his death which shall prevent the Devisee and shee surviving is remitted to the terme and therefore shall avoide the rent-charge 14. Eliz. Ployd 418 b. If Lessee for yeares granteth his terme to a Feme-covert and another or if a feme-sole and another are Joyn-tenants for years and shee taketh an husband the Joynture is not dissolved but continueth and the Survivor of the feme or the stranger shall have all the terme because the terme is a Chattell reall and the marriage of the feme shall not devest the terme out of the feme but shee had an estate in it as shee had before so that if an estranger oust them the feme ought to joyne with the baron in the suite of ejectione firme and the feme shall have judgement as well as the baron Ployd ibidem So in an action of debt upon arrearages of account against one who was receivor to the feme whilst shee was sole they both must joyne though the Auditors were assigned during the coverture for the very cause of action that is the receipt was in her right 16. E. 4. 8. The husband hath power also to dispose of things in action and his release of an obligation made to the feme or where goods were taken from her whilst shee was sole shall be good against the wife and he dye 87. H. 8. 1. But if he dye without making such a release the Wife shall have an Action upon the Obligation and not the Executors of the husband likewise the wife or her Executor if shee dye shall have those things in action and not the husband but shee may make her husband her Executor and then he shall recover them to her use 39. H. 6. 27. The wife is unable to contract with any without the consent of her husband and upon a Feoffment to a feme covert shee taketh nothing unlesse her husband will agree and where one is bound to enfeoff the husband and wife the husbands refusall is the refusall of them both Finch Nomot f. 44. And where the husband and wife are joynt Purchasers the husband may make a Feoffment and livery upon the Land which shall worke a discontinuance though the wife be in presence upon the Land and will not agree But if the husband and wife bargaine and sell the wives Lands by Indenture and the Vendee grant unto them for the same a yearly rent her acceptance of this rent after her husbands death doth not bar her of the Land although the acceptance be an agreement to the bargaine but the bargaine being but a contract is the bargaine of the husband onely and not of the wife for a wife is sub potestate viri cui invita contradicere non potest and therefore is the Writ cui invita given to the wife by Law for the recovery of her Land after her husbands death being aliened by him and therfore it is that Judges when a woman is to acknowledge any fine of any Lands doe examine her apart from her husband to know whether shee be willing or come to doe it by compulsion of the husband Offi of Ex. f. 210. And upon a joynt purchase of the husband and wife during coverture if the husband alien shee shall recover the whole after her husbands decease unlesse shee acknowledge a Fine and a cui invita is given to the feme by the Statute of Westminster 2. c. 3. upon a recovery by default against baron and feme and by the equity of it a feme divorced shall have a cui ante divortium to recover the Land lost by baron and feme by default before the divorce Ployd f. 58. a. And if Lands be given in Frank-marriage and a divorce had afterwards the feme shall have all the Land ibidem the reason that he there giveth is because the marriages of women and their advancement by it are much favoured in Law as if a woman give Lands to a man causa matrimonij praelocuti and he will not marry her shee shall have a Writ to recover the Land ibidem and Dyer f. 13. A man giveth certaine goods to his Daughter in marriage upon a divorce the feme shal have al the goods so given that are not spent because they were given for her advancement so as it is regularly true In omnibus fere uxori sub potestate viri succurritur Coke l. 9. f. 84. b. In all things almost the Law helpeth the wife because shee is under the power of her husband as if baron and feme as in right of the wife have right to enter into Lands and the Tenant dyeth seised the entry of the husband is taken away upon the heire which is in by descent but if the husband dye the wife or her heires may well enter upon the issue for the laches of her husband shall not turne to the prejudice of the wife or her heires Littl. but otherwise it is if the wrong was done to the feme sole before shee took husband Coke Com. f. 24. a. vide ibidem plura and unlesse it be for the performance of a condition annexed to the estate of Land as if a feme be infeoffed either before or after marriage reserving a rent and for default of non-payment a re-entry in that case the laches of the baron shall dis-inherit the wife for ever ibidem b. Ubi nullam matrimonium ibi nulla dos Bracton Coke com f. 32. a. where there is no marriage there is no dower Ployd f. 375. a. for the marriage of the woman is the principall cause of her dower and though the seisin of the baron and death of the husband are causes sine qua non without which a dower cannot be had yet the procatartique and impulsive cause of the dower of the woman is the paines and burden shee endureth under the power and yoke of matrimony for as Tholosanus Tholosanus Synt. L. 9. c. 11. matrimonium is quasi matris munus a matre potius quam a patre dictum because shee beareth the burden in her wombe and with painfull labour delivereth it and is very indulgent to nourish it and for those reasons as Bracton saith dowers were instituted for a competent livelyhood for the wife during her life to wit propter onus matrimonij ad sustentationem uxoris ad educationem liberorum si vir premoriatur for the burden of matrimony and sustentation of the wife and education of the children if the husband dy before l. 5. c. 22. which Ockam expresseth in a more affectionate terme and calleth her dower praemium pudoris the reward of her chastity and love f. 40. And therfore though it be not necessary that the seisin of the land shal continue during the coverture for notwithstanding the alienation of the husband the wife shall be endowed yet is it necessary the marriage shall continue for if
that be dissolved the dower ceaseth where the husband and wife are divorced a vinculo matrimonij as causa precontractus causa metus causa impotentiae seu frigiditatis causa affinitatis causa consanguinitatis and William Chadweth was divorced for that he did carnally know the Daughter before the marriage of the mother All these are causes of divorce preceding the marriage and dissolve the dower Coke Com. f. 32. a. 235. a. Yet it is said that if the assignement of dower ad ostium ecclesiae be specified to wit that notwithstanding any divorce shall happen yet that shee shall hold it for life that this is good ibidem but divorce a mensa thoro doth not dissolve the matrimony nor bar the feme of her dower Coke l. 7. f. 43. b. As it was adjudged T. 2. Jac. 18. 5. C. 23. S so well and Wilby dower Coke com f. 33. b. Yet if the wife elope from her husband and leave him and goeth away with the adulterer shee shall lose her dower untill her husband willingly without coertion ecclesiasticall be reconciled unto her and permit her to cohabite with him according to the vulgar verses Sponte virum mulier fugiens adultera facta Dote sua careat nisi sponsi sponte retracta And this is true although shee remaineth not continually with the adulterer or if shee tarrieth with him against her will or he turne her away or co-habiteth with her husband by censure of the Church in all these cases shee loseth her Dower Coke ibidem 32. b. yet though shee be barred of her dower shee may have an appeale and the reason is because the Statute of W. 2. c. 34. barreth her of her dower but not of her appeale Coke com f. 33. b. And for the abovesaid reasons dower is one of the three things are principally favoured in our Law and the Law by that name doth give her many freedomes for the very name Dos doth give her a freedome as according to the custome of the Kingdome mulieres viduae debem esse quietae de tallagijs Regist 142. 143. and tenant in dower shall not be distrained for the debt due to the King by the husband in his life time for the Lands which shee holdeth in dower of which Ockam yeeldeth this reason Doti ejus parcatur quia praemium pudoris est let her dower be spared because it is a reward of her chastity Coke com f. 31. a. By the Statutes of 1. E. 5. c. 2. 5. E. 6. c. 31. A wife shall not lose any title of dower which to her was accrued by the attainder of her husband by misprision of treason or any manner of murder or felony whatsoever but if the husband be attainted of high treason or petit treason shee shall be barred of her dower at this day so long as the attainder standeth in force which is more favourable to the woman then the common Law was Coke com f. 392. b. vide ibidem plura And a woman shall be endowed of a seisin in Law as where Lands or Tenements descend to the husband before entry he hath but a seisin in Law and yet the wife shall be endowed albeit it be not reduced to an actuall possession for it lyeth not in the power of the wife to bring it to an actuall possession as the husband may doe of his wifes Land when he is to be tenant by courtesy Coke com f. 31. a. If a man taketh a wife of the age of seven yeares and alieneth his Land and after she attaineth to the age of nine yeares the husband dyeth the wife shall be endowed for albeit shee was not absolutely dowable at the time of her marriage yet was she conditionably dowable to wit if she attained to the age of nine yeares before the death of her husband ibidem f. 33. a. An husband seised in fee of Lands giveth it in exchange and taketh others in exchange so as he was seised of both the wife shall not be endowed of both but she may take her election to be endowed of which she will Coke ibidem 31. If the wife be of the age of nine yeares and her husband dyeth she shall be endowed though her husband be but four years old ibidem or of what age soever the husband be quia non obstabit mulieri petenti dotem minor aetus viri because the inferior and lesser age of the man shall hinder the woman from demanding her dower and that albeit consensus non concubitus facit matrimonium and that a woman cannot consent before twelve nor a man before fourteen yet this inchoate and imperfect marriage from the which either of the parties at the age of consent may disagree after the death of the husband shall give dower to the wife and is accounted in Law legitimum matrimonium quo ad dotem a lawfull marriage in respect of her dower Coke com f. 33. a. If the husband alien his land and then the wife is attainted of felony now is she disabled but if she be pardoned before the death of her husband shee shall be indowed ibidem Dos de dote peti non debet Coke com f. 32. Dower ought not to be demanded of Dower as if there be Grandfather Father and Son and the Grandfather is of three acres of Land in fee and taketh wife and dyeth this Land descendeth to the Father who dyeth the wife of the Grandfather is endowed of one acre and dyeth the wife of the Father shall onely be endowed of two acres for dower must not be demanded of dower but otherwise it had been if the father had come to the Land by Feoffment from the Grandfather or by guift in taile the wife of the Father after the decease of the Grandfathers wife should have been endowed of that part assigned to the Grandmother for that the seisin that descended after the decease of the Grandfather is avoided by the indowment of the Grandmother whose title was consummated by the death of the Grandfather Non debent mulieribus assignari castra in dotem quae fuerunt virorum suorum quae de guerra existant Coke com f. 31. a. Castles ought not to be assigned to women for their dower which appertained to their husbands and which are for war and therefore of a Castle which is maintained for the necessary defence of the Realme a woman shall not be indowed because it ought not to be divided and the publick shall be preferred before the private but of a Castle which is onely for the use and private habitation of the owner a woman shall be endowed and that in the 7 th of Magna charta nisi domas illa sit castrum is taken for a Castle of publick defence De nullo quod est sua natura in divisibile divisionem non patitur nullam partem habebit uxor pro dote sua sed satisfaciat ei ad valentiam Bracton Coke com f. 32. Albeit of many Inheritances which be
and a Law was that thereby there might be certainty of titles and a peaceable possession without contradiction and as a Civilian saith ut sit finis litium that there might be an end of suits and therefore were the Statutes of limitation made within which the demandant that bringeth the action must prove himselfe or some of his Ancestors to be seised and in antient time the limitation in a Writ of right was from the time of H. 1. after that by the Statute of Merton the limitation was from the time of Henry the second and by the Statute of Westminster the first the limitation was from the time of Richard the first but because that limitation of the writ of right was for so long time passed the limitation of a writ of right was changed by the Statute of 32. H. 8. and reduced to threescore years next before the Teste of the Writ and so of other actions Coke com f. 115. a. vide ibidem plura And afterwards another Act was made 21. Jacob. that for the avoiding of suits all writs of Formedon in Descender Formedon in Remainder and Formedon in Reverter for any Mannors c. shall be sued and taken within twenty years and that after the twenty years expired none such or any of their heires shall have any such writ and that no person that hath right or title of entry into any Mannors c. shall thereunto enter but within twenty years vide ibidem cap. 6. plura But it is to be observed that time of limitation is twofold first in writs that is by diverse acts of Parliament the second is to make a title of inheritance and that is as hath been said to pleade a prescription de tempore cujus contrarium memoria hominum non existit Coke com f. 14. 15. which is by the common Law And this also accordeth with the rule of Bracton Longa possessio sicut jus parit jus possidendi tollit actionem a vero domino l. 2. f. 52. Long possession as right begetteth a right and taketh away an action from the true Lord and owner And so in antient times if the disseisor had been long in possession the Disseisee could not have entred upon him neither could the Disseisee have entred upon the Feoffee of the Disseisor if he had continued a yeare and a day in quiet possession and though the Law be now changed yet at this day the Disseisor dying seised being an act in Law barreth the disseisee of his entrance upon the heire and for that many advantages follow the possession and tenant the law taketh away the entry of him that would not enter upon the Ancestor who is presumed to know his title and driveth him to his Action against the heire that may be ignorant thereof Coke com f. 237. b. And for the above said reason the law yieldeth diverse utilities and advantages to the possessor for it is better to be a possessor then to complaine of others who are possessors because it imposeth the burden of proving on the Plaintiff so as if he can prove nothing he which possesseth shall be acquitted neither can possession be avoided but by possession Ployd 137 b. As if I make a lease for years of the lands of my wife and die the lease is not void before entry made by the wife for possession must be avoided by possession and such possession must be gained by entry But if my father die and his land descend to me a Lease for yeares made before my entry is good because I have possession in law and none hath possession in deed but if a stranger abate a lease made by me after is void for the stranger hath possession indeed before my entry upon him Ployd ibid. If an Executor bring an Action of trespasse for goods taken out of his possession it is not needfull to shew the Testament but if hee not ever was possessed of them but doth demand the thing then hee ought to have shewn the testament Ployd f. 46. a. And regularly it holdeth true that when the naked right of Land is released to one that hath jus possessionis and the other by a meane title recovereth the land from him the right in possession shall draw the naked right with it and shall not leave a right in him to whom the release is made as if the heire of the disseisor being in by descent is disseised by A. and the disseisee release to A. now hath A. the meere right to the land but if the heire of the disseisor enter into the Land and regaineth possession that shall draw with it the meere right to the land and shall not regaine the possession onely and leave the meere right in A. but the recontinuance of the possession the meere right is therewith vested in the heire of the disseisor Coke com 266. a. If a woman possessed of a terme for yeares take an husband and the wife dieth though during the life of the wife the terme was not devested out of the wife yet by her death it is vested in the husband and it is given to him by Act in law because it is a thing in possession and not in Action Pl f. 192. b. In pari causa possessor potior haberi debet Reg. I. C. In aequali jure â—elior est conditio possidentis Coke l. 4. f. 90. a As the Lord who is allowed but three Chaplaines retaineth six by his letters testimoniall at one and the same time and all the six are prefeâ—red to six severall plurallities the three which are first promoted are warranted by the statutes and yet the retainer was not according to the statute for in aequali jure melior est conditio possidentis In equall right better is the condition of him who is in possession ibidem If a man purchaseth severall lands at one time which are holden of several Lords by Knights service and dieth the Lord who first seiseth the ward shall have him because they are in aequali jure and there is no priority betweene them which if there were the elder Lord shall have him Perk. f. 6. If ten Mannors be conveyed to two severall persons by one deed which of them happeneth to get the Deed first may detaine it Two Attorneys are retained conjunctim divisim joyntly and severally the plea of him that first pleadeth shall stand because they are in aequali jure to plead If there be two joynt-tenants and one of them taketh all the profits of the land or all the rent the other hath no remedy Coke l. 2. f. 68. a. So the release of all Actions personall by one barreth the other but otherwise it is if the personalty be mixed with the realty and if there be two joynt-tenants Lords and the tenant holdeth by Knights service and the tenant dieth his heire within age and one Lord seiseth the Ward and the other distraineth for the services he that first seiseth or distraineth shall bind the other And
remainder is appointed in fee to the right heires of I. S. who dieth having a daughter which entreth after the death of tenant for life there the son after borne shall not recover the lands before vested in the daughter as purchased for thereit is a fee simple to which the son after born hath no right for the lands were in none of his Ancestors before But where the estate is an estate taile the son ought to have it per formam doni As if a feme which suffereth a recovery by covin contrary to the Statute of 11. H. 7. is defeated by entry of the daughter tenant in taile the son borne may enter and oust the daughter for that the title in taile is in him because the statute saith he shall enjoy it according to the title which is in taile and therein the common proverb is verified One shall beat the bush and the other have the bird As if a man hath land by descent of the part of the mother and maketh a feoffment on condition and dieth without issue and the heire of the part of the father entreth the heire of the part of the mother may oust him Ployd 56. b. and 57. a. In Wimbish case quod vide Infinitum injure reprebatur Coke l. 6. f. 45. What is infinite is reproved and rejected in law As if a man have a debt by simple contract and taketh an obligation for the same debt or any part of it the contract is determined 3. H. 4. 17. 11. H. 4. 9. and 9. E. 4. 50. 51. So if a man have a debt upon an obligation and by course of law hath a judgement upon it the contract by specialty is changed into a thing of record for if he that recovereth should have a new Action or a new judgement he may have infinite Actions and infinite judgements to the perpetuall charge and vexation of the defendant and he shall not have a new Action or a new judgement for what is infinite is rejected in law So upon every judgement the defendant shall be amerced and if he bee a Duke Marquess Earle Viscount or Baron he shall be amerced 100 l. and so the defendant should be infinitely amerced upon an obligation which shall be mischievous Ibid. And lib. 7. f. 45. b. It was resolved in the Court of Wards by the greater part that a Bill of reviver upon a bill of reviver shall not be admitted by reason of the infiniteness which is rejected in law And lib. 8. f. 16. b. When the first office is found against the King and the melius inquirendum also the King is bound nor to have any melius inquirendum for the same matter because there should be no end of it and that such writs might issue infinitely and infinity is condemned in law Nihil tam conveniens naturali aequitati quam voluntatem domini volentis suam rem in aliam transferre ratam haberi Bracton f. 18. God hath given to man all the land terram dedit filiis bominum So men by Gods endowment are made Lords of the land and what property a man hath in lands by law by the law of God also he hath dominion of it and therefore every man who is the lawfull owner of land may grant to what person in what manner and for what time it pleaseth him for if the land be subject to man then is it subject to his will for the will cometh from the mind which is the principall part of man because it directeth the body and all things he hath and if his land be subject to his will this his will is a sufficient consideration by which his land may pass as his will is and there is no greater consideration then the will Ployd f. 308. b. And nothing is more agreeable to naturall equity then to ratify the will of the Lord willing to transferr his substance and estate over to another And therefore at the common law the intention and will of the parties was the direction of uses for they were onely determinable and to be adjudged by the Chancellor which is the Court of conscience and equity and there is nothing more agreeable to equity then that the will of the Lord or owner and the meaning of the parties should direct the uses 31. H. 16. Tit. subpaena Fitz. 23. A man being ceste que use and having one sole daughter declared his intent and meaning to the Feoffees that after his decease his daughter should have his land and for it question was made in the Chancery whether the limitation of that use made to the daughter might be revoked and in reasoning of that case Fortescue held opinion that if ceste que use had issue a daughter and being sick declared his intention to his feoffee that his daughter shall have his land after his decease and after hee recovered his health he had issue a sonne now saith hee it is good conscience the sonne should have the Subpaena because hee is heire for conscientia dicitur a conset scio quasi simul scire cum Deo that is to know the will of God so neere as reason will and the intention of the parties is to direct the uses according to a conscionable and benigne construction Coke l. 1. f. 100. a. b. vide ibidem plura As a gift in taile may bee made upon condition that tenant in taile may alien for the profits of his issue and good and hee may alien notwithstanding the Statute of W. 2. because in that case voluntas donatoris observatur The will of the Donor is observed Coke com 224. b. If Lands be given to B. and his heires Habendum to him and the heires of his body or if given to him and the heires of his body Habendum to him and his heires he hath estate taile and a fee expectant but if Lands bee given to B. and his heires if B. have heires of his body and if he die without heires of his body that it shall revert to the Donor it is an estate taile and the reversion in the Donor for voluntas donatoris in charta doni sui manifeste expressa est observanda The will of the Donor manifestly expressed in the Charter of the gift is to be observed Coke com f. 21. a. If a common person doth without consideration give to I. S. his goods indefinitely all his goods doe pass 21. E. 4. 25. Alba of Waltams case by Brown and Genny If the King doe grant to one lands ex mero motu and though his Highnesse doth rehearse some consideration in the patent of his grant which is not true as if the consideration bee that whereas the Grantee hath done his Majesty good service on the Sea or beyond the Sea or in his Wars though the consideration bee meerely supposed and therefore no good consideration in Law yet the words ex mero motu doe make the Grant good 26 H. 8. 1. by Fitz. And if a common person doe by deed
not though a deed without an inrolement may pass the reversion but it was meant they should pass together if one disseise another of two Acres in Dale and the disseisee release to the Disseisor all his right in all his Lands in Dale and delivereth the release as an escrow to be delivered to the disseisor as his deed before the second of May and before that day the disseisor disseiseth him of another Acre in D. and then the releafe is delivered unto him the second day of May the right to the third Acre shall not pass because it was not his intent to release it Ployd One reciting by his Deed that whereas by prescription he hath used to finde a Chaplaine because some controversie hath growne of it granteth by the same deed to doe it this determineth not the prescription for the intent of the Deed reciting the prescription was to confirme it and not make a new grant 21. H. 7. 6. Though it be a generall rule that the words which the common people use to expresse their intent ought to be taken according to the intent and not according to the very definition in Hills and Granges case f. 170. And that generalis regula generaliter est intelligenda yet this rule is principally to be observed in cases of uses which were onely trusts and confidences between man and man Coke l. 6. f. 64. vide ibidem plura in Sir Moile Finches case And Coke l. 1. f. 100. Shelleys case we finde in diverse cases of our Books that the intention of parties is the direction of uses by a conscionable and benigne construction as if a man seised of Lands of the part of his mother maketh a feoffment in fee reserving a rent to him and his heirs by the common Law the rent shall goe to the heir of the part of the father Lit. But if a man be seised of lands of the part of the mother and maketh a Feoffment in fee to the use of him and his Heirs such use shall not goe to the heire at the common Law but in regard the Land moved from the part of the mother therfore in equity the use which is nothing else but a trust and confidence shall also goe to the heirs of the part of the mother 5. E. 4. f. 4. And though Littleton saith that a man in a Feoffment and grant shall not have a Fee-simple without these words Heirs yet if a man before the Statute of 27. H. 8. had bargained and sold his Land for mony without these words heires the bargainee had a Fee-simple because at the common Law nothing passed from the bargainer but an use which is guided by the intention of the parties which was to convey Land wholly to the bargainee for that the Law intendeth that the bargainee paid the true value of the Land for it is in equity and according to the intent of the parties the bargainee had a Fee-simple without these words heires 27. H. 8. f. 5. Coke ibidem And as Ployd f. 345. a. A fortiori the intent saith he shall be observed in wills where the words cannot be performed for Testamentum est testatio mentis but that which is other then the intention is not the testation of the minde and therefore as he saith also f. 54. b. It is the office of Judges to marshall the words of wills according to the intentions of the parties for the most part of them are made in extremity and when there is no counsell of Law ready or present and the testators themselves are not for the most part learned in the Law and are accounted inopes consilij neither have they knowledge to put words in good order and therefore the ignorance and simplicity of those which make their wills require a favorable interpretation of the words of the will according to the intent As Lands were devised to one for life the remainder for life the remainder Ecclesiae sancti Audreae in Holborne and since the death of tenants for life the Parson of the said Church sued an ex gravi querela and it was pleaded in Judgement that the remainder took no effect because the Church was not a Parson capable and upon that was a demurrer and adjudged that the devise was good and that the Parson shall have execution and yet the Parson was not named in the devise but was comprehended in it Pas 21. R. 2. If a man devise the Mannor of D. and had nothing in it at the time of making the will and that since he purchased it it shall passe by the devise for it shall be taken his intention was to purchase it and if it should not passe the will should be void to all intents Ployd f. 344. a. So if one devise Land to the wife of I. S. and I. S. dyeth and shee taketh to husband another and after the devisor dyeth shee shall have the Land and yet shee was not the wife of I. S. when the devisor dyed nor shall not take it as his wife but the intent was that shee that was the wife of I. S. at the time of the making of the Will shall have it And if a man devise Lands to Alexander Nowell Deane of Pauls and to the Chapter there and their Successors and Alexander Nowell dyeth and a new Deane is made and then the devisor dyeth the land shall vest in the new Deane and Chapter and yet it vesteth not according to the words but according to the intent for the cheife intent was to convey it unto the Deane and the Chapter and their Successors for ever and the singular person of Alexander Nowell was not the principall cause but by chance was one of the causes Ployd 344. b. If one devise by will in writing Land to one and his Heirs and then in another clause after he deviseth out of that Land a rent-charge to him and his heirs it shall be good to the one for the rent and to the other for the Land and the rent in construction of Law shall be taken to be first devised although it be last in words and so one part shall stand with the other and good sence shall be made and the intent of the testator shall be observed in both Ployd f. 541. contrary to the rule of the civill Law ubi pugnantia inter se in testamento jubentur neutrum ratum est If in the Premisses of a will one deviseth Lands to one in fee and in the end of the will he deviseth it to another in fee the latter part shall confound the former because he had last such an intent and as the last will shall repeale the former will by the same reason the last part of the will shall repeale the former part of the will which is contrary to it ibidem vide plura in Paramors case Bendloes Rep. f. 209. B. Being sick sent for a Councellor and desired him to write his last will and testament of his Lands and declared unto
suerum cum averijs Abbot Conventus renounceth all the Common which he hath used to have of his Cattle with the Cattle of the Abbot and Covent and that release of Common was there taken void because he did not shew to whom he renounced the common yet there was a full intent for he had common in the Land of the Abbots and he had intent to release it to him but for the incertainty it was void And a Lease was made to Baron and Feme and the reversion of the Land that the Baron held was granted and it was held void notwithstanding the intent because it missed of the certainty of the particular estate H. 13. E. 3. Fitz. grants 63. And so where there were Lord and tenant of three acres and the Lord granted the signiory which he had out of one Acre it was held void in 17. E. 3. notwithstanding the intent because his intent did not agree with Law and so where a man holdeth of one by Castle garder Homage and Fealty and he granteth to another all his services it was held in 31. E. 1. that the Castle-garder cannot passe because he did not grant such a Castle but reserved it and therefore he who hath not the Castle cannot have the Castle guarder so his intent in granting al the services could not make all to passe because it was not according to Law and so the Law ruleth the intent and the intent not the Law Ployd ibidem in Throckmortons case Coke l. 1. f. 84. b. A man giveth Land to M. and 1. his Sisters and to the heirs of the bodies of them lawfully begotten by which they had a joynt estate for life and severall inheritances and the Donor intending that neither of them should break the Joynture but the Survivor should have all per jus accrescendi added this clause sub hac forma that shee that should longest live should have all the Land but because his intent is contrary to Law for this cause if the Joynture be severed by fine the Survivor shall not have the part so severed by the said clause which he hath inserted of his conceit and his own imagination contrary to Law and reason ibidem But in Wills the intent shall be observed and onely thought of because the Testator had no time to order all things according to Law by presumption but is suddenly made oftentimes and so the diversity Ployd f. 162. b. And therefore Ploy f. 414. a. The intent in devises maketh estates to passe contrary to the rules of the common Law in deeds and other gifts As if I devise Land to one A. for life whereas there is not any such the remainder in fee he in the remainder shall take the Land though there be no estate precedent And 34. E. 3. one had issue a Son and Daughter and deviseth Land devisable to one for life upon condition that if the Son disturbe tenant for life or his Executors of their Administration that then the Land shall remaine to the Daughter and dyeth the Daughter after the death of the tenant for life bringeth a Formedon in remainder against the son alledgeth that the tenant had disturbed the Tenant for life and the Executors and the Tenant traversed it upon it issue joyned and the condition took the fee out of the Son and put in the Daughter by allowance in Law in performance of the intent of the Devisee though the remainder did not vest when the first estate took effect Ployd ibidem Coke com f. 322. a. b. If a man lease Lands devisable for life c. the reversion by his testament in fee c. and dyeth and then the Tenant maketh wast the Devisee shall have a writ of Wast although the Tenant never attorned because the will of the Devisor made by his will shall be performed according to the intent of the Devisor and if the Tenant will never attorne then it shall never be performed and therefore he shall have an action of wast or distraine without Attornement Littleton for it is a maxime of the common Law ultima voluntas testatoris est perimplenda secundum veram intentionem sufam Coke ibidem for if a man devise his Tenements to another by testament Habendum sibi in perpetuum and dyeth and the Devisee entreth he hath a Fee-simple causa qua supra and yet if a feoffment had been made to him by the Devisor in his life of the same Tenements Habendum sibi in perpetuum and livery and seisin upon it made he shall have an estate onely for terme of his life Littleton Ibidem Coke com f. 9. b. Though by the common Law an estate of inheritance may not passe without these words Heires yet in devise it may as if a man devise twenty acres to another and that he shall pay to the Executors for the same ten pound he hath a Fee-simple by the intent of the Devisor albeit it be not the value of the Land 21. E. 3 16. So if a man devise Lands to give or to sell or in feodo simplici or to him or his Assignes for ever in all these cases a Fee simple doth passe by the intent of the Devisor but if the devise be to a man and his Assignes without saying for ever the devisee hath but an estate for life if I devise Land to one sanguini suo it is a Fee simple but if it be semini suo it is an estate tayle ibidem Exception Coke l. 1. f. 85. 86. in Câ—rbets case It was ruled by all the Justices that such an estate which cannot by the rules of the common Law be conveyed by act executed in his life by advice of counsell learned in the Law such an estate cannot be devised by the will of man who is intended in Law to be in ops consilij as if I devise Lands to one by will in perpetuum he hath a fee for such an estate may be conveyed by estate executed but if I devise further that if the Devisee doth such an act that then another shall have his Lands to him and his Heires that is void because such limitation if it was by act executed is void for as Dyer f. 33. pl. 12. A man cannot devise an estate in fee to one and if he doe not such an act his estate shall cease and another have it for when he hath disposed the estate in fee he hath not power in the same will to devise it to another and f. 4. pl. 7. when the intent of man who maketh a testament doth not agree with the Law the intent shall be taken void as if a man devise his Land to H. in fee and that if he dye without heir that M. shall have the Land this devise is void because one Fee-simple cannot depend upon another in law the same law is if the devise be to the Abbot of Saint Peter de W. where the foundation is to the Abbot of St. Paul
Coke com f. 25. a. A devise cannot direct an inheritance to descend contrary to the rules of the Common Law as if a man devise Lands to one and the heires males of his body and hath issue a Daughter who hath issue a Son the Son shall not inherit as heire male because he must convey the descent from the heires males for though a devise may create an inheritance by other words then a gift can yet can it not direct an inheritance to descend contrary to the rule of Law and no intent of the devisor appeareth that the Son of the Daughter should against the rule of the Law inherit vide Ployd f. 414. b. So if a gift be made to a man and the heirs females of his hody and hath issue a Son who hath issue a Daughter this Daughter shall never inherit vide ibidem plura Prâ—ximus sum egomet mihi Ployd f. 545 a. It is the naturall order to karve himselfe before he karve another and charity beginneth at home And therefore in legacies it is reason that the Executors shall have preferment of satisfaction before others and the Law maketh allowance to them before any others because as Lit. faith they represent the person of the Testator and Coke com f. 209. b. The Executors doe more represent the person of the Testator then the heire doth to the Ancestor for though the Executor be not named in Mortgage yet the Law appointeth him to receive the mony but so doth not the Law appoint the heire to receive the mony unlesse he be named and therefore if the Obligee maketh the Obligor his Executor it is a release in Law and if the Obligor make the Obligee his Executor the Action is gone for they are as it were the same person in law whence the law maketh allowance to them before any other For if a man devise to A. 20 l. and to B. 20 l. and to C. 20 l. and maketh his executor and dieth having goods only to the value of 20 l. now it is in the election of the executor to which of those three he will pay the 20 l. and if he pay it to one the other cannot contradict it neither hath he any remedy for his legacy so by the same reason if one of the three be made executor to the testator the law saith he may and will retaine the 20 l. in satisfaction of his legacy and the law alloweth of it for it is reason that he be next to himselfe and have regard to himselfe before another And this is the reason of the case in 12. H. 4. f. 21. where in debt upon an obligation against the heir he pleaded that the Plaintiff was executor to Lancestor which deed he put before them and administred certaine goods and Chattels to the value of the debt and more and retained the same summe with him in the name of payment and demanded judgement if Action And Hull said that if he did not retaine the same to himselfe and might have retained it and did not he shall be barred for a man is bound to be next to himself and this was the opinion of some of them for which he pleaded there that he adminstred no goods after the death of the Testator vide ibidem plura in Paramers case And for the same reason doth the law in all reciprocall acts respect mutuall recompence and consideration for if there be no consideration why should they be made Doct. and St. and it is supposed there was error in such Acts because there is no consideration of profit for every one is next unto himselfe ad suum lucrum satis sapit is sufficiently wise to project his owne emolument And therefore have considerations a great effect in lawes and customes for consideration is the beginning of all customes the grounds of all uses the reason of all rights and the causes of all duties For without consideration nothing is wrought by any conveyance no interest transferred no right removed nor duty accrued and no custome hath continuance As if the Lord of the Manner prescribe that every one who passeth the highway which lyeth in his Mannor shall pay 12. d. to him for his passage this is void and not upon good consideration but if he prescribe to have a penny of every one that passeth such a Bridge which the Lord of the Mannor doth use to repaire this is a good prescription Calthrope Copy-holds f. 35. and 36. And therefore is consideration described by Dier f 336. to be the cause or occasion of a meritorious recompence either in deed or law for all contracts and bargaines have quid pro quo contractus est quasi actus contra actum and must have quid pro quo Coke com f. 47. b. And so it is in exchanges annuities pro consilio impendendo or service rents services and tenures for dâ—meanes of Lands as Frank-almoigne Homage-auncestrell for warranty and acquittall commons for cause of vicinage or service Devise of a woman causa matrimonij praelocuti so the manner of a gift to doe such a thing or to make such a thing Considerations are either executory or executed and in considerations executory the recompence failing the Feoffment or grant ceaseth as a feoffment to instruct the feoffor in one mistery or Art if the Feoffor dieth before instruction the heir shall re-enter 21. E. 3. Grant of an Office and for the executing it a fee if the office be determined the fee is determined M. 5. E. 4. 7. and 20. E. 4. If a woman give land causa matrimonii prelocuti and he will not marry her she shall have a writ to recover the land Ployd f. 58. a. If a man make a lease for yeares rendring rent the lessee needeth not pay any rent if the Lessor had nothing in the land at the time of the lease because he had not quid pro quo Coke com f. 47. b. If I grant an annuity pro consilio impendendo if he wil not give me councell I must stay my annuity Ployd 144. b. An usuall and accustomed attendance of a corodian upon the Soveraigne of a monastery upon festivall daies determineth the corodie it being a reward for attendance Exchanges not executed by each party at the first is defeasible 9. H. 4. A portion of rithes granted by indenture for ever without cavillation or contradiction and an annuity granted for the aforesaid portion So to have a way for my life and I grant an annuity of 20 s. without limitation the annuity shall endure but during my life Dier 336. 337. Where no consideration is expressed there the consideration may be averred Dier 146. Vellies case A rehersall of a consideration past whether it be true or false shall not dissolve the gift as because he served me in the Wars beyond the Seas although it be false it is not materiall Bracton in modis donationum and so in the case of the King Dier f. 337. If A. enfeoff B.
if he be an honest man Swimb f. 210. It is an observation of a Divine that oathes ex officio had their birth from Caiphas Math. 26. who who first imposed it on our Saviour in the name of the living God saying I adjure or charge thee in the name of the living God that thou tellest us whither thou be'st Christ the Son of the living God And Mr. Pryn saith that Cardinall Woolsy the highest Priest in England was the first that invented oathes ex officio in England and that they were much inveighed against by Latimer in his Sermons and condemned by the expresse words of the petition of right providing against such oathes Prin. Vind. f. 42. Impotentia excusat legem impotency excuseth the Law Coke com f. 29. a. The Law tendreth the weaknesses and debilities of others execuseth their un-abilities ultra posse non est esse because no man is able to doe more then he can do As if a man dyeth seised of Lands in fee-simple c. and these Lands descend to his Daughter and shee taketh an husband and hath issue and dyerh before any entry the husband shall not be tenant by courtesy because it was in the power of the husband to have entred but if a man be seised of an advowson or a rent in fâ—e and hath issue a daughter who is married and hath issue and dyeth seised the wife before the rent became due or the Church became void dyeth he shall be Tenant by courtesy because he could by no industry enter or attaine to any other seisin then a seisin in Law or bring it to an actuall seisin And f. 258. b Though an Hermite or an Anachorite be shut up himself so as by his order he is not to come out in person yet to avoid a descent he may command one to make claim and such a recluse may allwayes appeare by an Attorney in such cases where others must appeare in proper person and f. 263. b. An Abbot of a Monastery dyeth and during the vacation one wrongfully entreth into a certaine parcell of the Land of the Monastery claiming the Land to him and his heirs and dyeth seised and the Land descendeth to the heire and then one is elected Abbot the Abbot may enter upon the heire for by the death of the Abbot no person is able to make continuall claime and therefore a descent in that kind shall not prejudice the succession Coke l. 1. f. 98. a. If the Lessee Covenant to leave wood in the same plight the wood was at the time of the lease and afterwards the trees be sub-verted by tempest hs is discharged of his covenant by reason of his impotency and l. 4. f. 11. a. If the Lord release to the Tenant so long as I. S. hath heire of his body and sixty years passe and then I. S. dyeth without heire of his body in this case though the sixty years be passed yet the Lord may distraine for it was impossible that she should attaine to any seisin within that time and therefore the act of limitation made in 32. H. 8. doth not extend to such rent or service that by common possibility could not happen or become due within sixty years and so if Land holden by Homage and Fealty be conveyed to a Mayor and Commonalty c. in this case they cannot doe their Homage and Fealty yet though they have enjoyed the Land above sixty years if they alien the Land the Lord may distraine for Homage and Fealty 33 H 8. Br. Tit. Fealty 15. vide ibidem pluta in Bevills case and lib. 6. f. 21. b. in Butlers case It was resolved that legall imprisonment without Covin is a good excuse of non-residency in any Parson by reason of his impotency Quod remedio destituitur ipsa revalet si culpa ab sit the thing which is destitute of remedy availeth in the matter it selfe if there be no fault or laches in the party Coke l. 6. f. 68. a. As if a man be seised of a manner part of which is in lease for life and part in lease for yeares and levieth a fâ—ne to A. to the use of B. in tail with diverse remainders over in this case B. shall avow for rent or have an Action of Wast without any Attornement for when the reversion is setled in any one in judgement of Law and he hath no meanes to compell the tenant to attorne and no laches or fault is in him there he shall avow or have an Action of Wast without Attornment As if the Lord in Mortmaine or if a villaine claimeth a reversion by this claime the Law vesteth thiS reversion in him and he hath no meanes to compell the tenant to attorne and therefore he shall avow or have an Action of Wast without Attornement the same Law is of Letters Patents and of the devise of a reversion for in all those cases culpa abest there is no fault 9. H. 6. vide ibidem plura in Sir Moile Finches case And Coke l. 8. f. 172. b. in Hales case If the heire at full age tender his livery and dyeth within three months before he hath accomplished it so as the making of his homage or suing out of his livery without default in him is become impossible by the act of God he shall have as much advantage by his tender as if he had made homage or sued out his livery for impotency in this case excuseth the Law and in the judgement of the Law the interest of the King by the said limitation is determined as if the Lord had taken homage of the heire when he made his tender vide ibidem plura Coke l. 10. f. 139. b. If tenant for life or for years doth not repaire a wall of dirt so as by his default the Land is surrounded and becometh unprofitable that is Wast but if the Land be surrounded by the extraordinary rage and violence of the Sea without any default in him that is not Wast no more then if an house was burnt by lightning or subverted by the rage of the wind or tempest without default of the Lessee for impotency excuseth the party vide ibidem plura in Kighleys case So as it is regularly true that the Law tendreth the infirmities of unable persons and excuseth their impossibilities as of men illiterate out of the Realme in Prison Infants Idiots out of their sound minde as also of blind and deafe dumbe and blind If a man illiterate be bound to make a deed he is not bound to seale or deliver any writing that shall be tendred unto him and if it be Latine or other Language which he understandeth not he may demand that one read it and expound it unto him and if none be there present to read and expound it the party may refuse to deliver it for his ignorance excuseth him Coke l. 2. f. 3. Mansers case And for that reason if the Deede be read unto him in other words then are contained within
so long as he hath no understanding Lastly he that by his own vicious act for a time depriveth himselfe of his memory and understanding as he is that is drunk Coke com 147. a. Coke l. 4. 124. b. And for the three first sorts of mad men the Law is that they shall not lose their lives for felony or murder because they want reason and understand not what they doe neither can the punishment of a mad man who is deprived of reason and understanding be an example to others And therefore as Ployd f. 19. a. If a man of non sanae memoriae kill another although he hath broken the words of the Law yet he hath not broken the Law because he had not any memory nor understanding but meere ignorance which cometh unto him by the hand of God and therefore it is called unvoluntary ignorance to which the Law imputeth the act done because no default iâ— in him and therefore he shall be excused in that he is ignorant by compulsion and such an act is called and termed ex ignorantia to wit in that involuntary ignorance is the cause and God provided a speciall remedy that he who doth such a thing by such ignorance shall not be punished for it as Deut. 19. if a laborer be at labor with an hatchet and the head of the hatchet flyeth off and killeth another that such a laborer shall not be put to death because he did it by un-voluntary ignorance but if a man breake the Law by un-voluntary ignorance there he shall not be excused As if at man be drunk and kill another this is Felony and he shall be hanged for it and yet he did this by ignorance for when he was drunk he had neither memory nor understanding but because that ignorance came unto him by his own act and folly and he might resist this ignorance he shall not be priviledged by it because he is voluntarius daemon Coke com f. 247. and as Aristotle saith is worthy of double punishment because he hath dâ—ubly offended to wit in being drunke to the ill example of others and also in doing of the act and this act is called and said to be done ignoranter to wit that he is the cause of his owne ignorance and so there is a diversity of a thing done ex ignorantia ignoranter Ployd ibidem And Coke com f. 247. a. Omne crimen ebrietatis incendit detegit and what hurt or ill soever he doth in his drunkennesse doth aggravate it and that as well in case touching his life his Lands his Goods or any other thing concerneth him Coke l. 4. f. 125. Also for the same reason non compos mentis cannot commit petit treason as if a wife non compos mentis slay her husband as appeareth 12. H. 3. Tit. forfeiture 33. But in some cases non compos mentis may commit high Treason as if he slay or offer to slay the King this is high Treason for the King is caput Reipub the head and safety of the Common-wealth and from the head good health is conveyed to all and for this cause their persons are so sacred that none ought to offer them violence but he shall be reus laesae majestatis guilty of high Treason Coke l. 4. f. 124. b. And likewise for the same reason many are the priviledges which the Law giveth to one who is not compos mentis and his heires as if an idiot or non compos mentis maketh a Feoffment in person and dyeth his heire within age he shall not be in ward and if he dyeth without heire the Land shall not eschcate but if he make a Feoffment by Letter of Attorny although the Feoffor can never avoid it yet as to others in judgment of Law the State was void and therefore in such case if the heir be within age he shall be in ward and if he dyeth without heires the Land shall escheate and that is the true reason of the bookes in 7. H. 4. 5. and 7. H. 4. 12. And so is there a great diversity between an estate made by the person of a mad man and by his Attorny Coke l. 4. 125. Also an idiot in an action brought against him shall appeare in proper person and he that can plead best for him shall be admitted 33. H. 6. 18. otherwise it is of him who becometh non compos mentis for he shall appeare by his guardian if he be within age and by an Attorny if be be of full age Coke ibidem f. 124. b. So if a man of non sanae memoria â—ath cause to enter into tenements and a descent is had in his life during the time he was of non sana memoriae and then dyeth his heire may enter upon him is in by descent Littleton and though Littleton there saith that the Ancestor who had the same title could not enter during his life yet in case of a bar of his right he may As if a man of non compos mentis be disseised and the disseisor levieth a fine in this case at the common Law though the yeare and the day be passed yet he that was non compos mentis shall not be bound by it but that he might well enter Coke l. 4. f. 125. vide ibidem plura But if an Idiot or a non compos mentis by accident or qui lucidis gaudet intervallis maketh a Feoffment in fee he shall in pleading never avoid it by saying that he was an Idiot c. at the time of the Feoffment because it is a maxime in the common Law that no man of full age shall be received in any Plea by the Law to disable himselfe contrary to the opinion of some that he may avoid his own act by Entry or Plea and others that he may avoid it by Writ and not by Plea and others as Fitzherbert in his Writ of dum fuit non compos mentis that he may avoid either by Plea or by Writ but Littleton here is of opinion that neither by Plea Writ or otherwise he himselfe shall avoid it and herewith the greatest authorities of ouâ— Books doe agree and so was it resolved in Beverlyes case Coke l. 4. Though this Maxime holdeth not in criminall causes as before hath been said Coke com f. 247. Yet doth not the Law leave one who is non compos mentis destitute of remedy in this case but that upon an office found for the King the King shall avoid the Feoffment of him who is of non compos mentis for the benefit of him whose custody the Law giveth to the King and all that he hath for the King is bound by the Lawes to defend his Subjects and their Goods and Chattells Lands and Tenements as Fitzherbert saith N. B. 232. and therefore the King of right ought to have and to order him his Lands and Goods and this was by the common Law as appeareth by Britton f. 16. who writ in the fifth yeare of
and his Heires shall not alien the bond is good yet he may notwithstanding alien if he will forfeit his bond that he himselfe hath made So a bond with condition that the Feoffee shall not take the profits is good so a bond upon condition to enfeoff his wife is good though it be against a maxime in Law Coke com f. 206. And if the husband be bound to pay his wife mony the bond is good Non valet impedimentum quod de jure non sertitur effectuum Reg. I. C. Coke l. 4. 31. a. The let or impediment availeth not which taketh not his effect from the Law as if the Lord be disseised and the disseisor dyeth seised or if the Land be recovered from him by verdict or erronious judgement in these cases untill the Land is recovered or the judgment annihilated by the Law the land is not demisable and yet after the land be re-continued it is grantable againe by copy but if copy-hold lands be forfeited to the Lord or escheate and before any new grant made those lands be extended upon a Statute or Recognisance acknowledged by the Lord or if the wife of the Lord in a writ of dower hath that land assigned to her though those impediments be acts in law yet for that that those interruptions are legall the lands shall never after be granted by copy ibidem The words of an Act of Parliament must be taken in a lawfull and rightfull sense as where by the Statute of Gloucester it is forbidden that the husband shal not alien the lands he hath in right of his wife whereof no fine is levied in the Kings court those words are to be understood where no fine is lawfully levied in the Kings Court and therefore a fine levied by the husband alone is not within the meaning of that Statute for that fine should worke a wrong to the wife but a fine levied by the husband and wife is intended by the Statute and that is lawfull and worketh no wrong for generally the rule is non praestat impedimentum quod de jure non sortitur effectum so the Statute of W. 2. c. 5. Ita quod episcopus ecclesiam conferat is construed ita quod episcopus ecclesiam legitime conferat Coke com f. 361. b. Nullam iniquam in jure praesumendum Coke l. 4. f. 71. No injurious thing is to be presumed in the law for the law so abhorreth injury that it granteth writs of anticipation to prevent them quia timet because a man feareth them and that before any molestation distresse or impleading and there are six sorts of such writs first a man may have his writ of Mesne before he be distrained 2. a Warrantia Cartae before he be impleaded 3. a Monstraverunt before any distresse or vexation 4. an Audita quereta before any execution sued 5. a Curia claudenda before any default of inclosure and is a ne Injuste vexes before any distresse or molestation Coke com f. 100. a. And such an Antipathy there is between the Law and injury that no injury is to be presumed in the law and as Coke l. 10 f. 56. a. Odiosa in honesta non sunt in lege praesumenda in facto quod se habet ad bonum ad malum magis de bono quam de malo praesumendum est odious and dishonest things are not presumed to be in the law and in a deed or action which hath in it both good and evil it ought to be more presumed of the good then of the evill as there in the case of the Chancellor of Oxford it was resolved that covin and fraud shall never be intended or presumed in the law unlesse it be expresly averred and in the case of Tier and Meriell Trin. 10. Jacob. That if no fraude be found by the Jurors the Judges shall not adjudge a Feoffment fraudulent and that though the Jurors have found circumstances and presumptions to intitle the Jurors to find fraude it is but evidence to the Jury and not any matter upon which the Court may adjudge fraude and the office of the Jurors is to adjudge upon the evidence concerning matter of fact and upon it to give their verdict and not to leave matter of evidence to the Court to judge which doth not appeare to them as if A. bring an action of the case against B. upon trover and conversion of Plate and Jewells and the Defendant pleadeth not guilty now it is good evidence to prove the conversion that the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to deliver them and he refused it and by it it shall be presumed that he hath converted them to his use yet notwithstanding that is but evidence and if it be found by a speciall verdict that the Plaintiff requested them of the Defendant and he refused it that is not matter upon which the Court can adjudge any conversion for the conversion ought to alter the action of detinue into a trespasse upon the case which a denier cannot in law make for in every action of Detinue there is alledged in the count a request and a refusall yet it is good evidence and hath allwayes been allowed to prove a conversion that the Plaintiff demanded the goods and the Defendant refused to deliver them Coke l. 10. In the case of the Chancellor of Oxford vide ibidem plura Nomen non sufficit si res non sit de jure aut de facto the name of a thing is not sufficient if the matter and substance be not of right or deed Coke l. 4. f. 107. b. Pope Vrbane at the request of Ralph Baron of Greystack founded a Colledge of a Master and six Preists resident at Greystock and assigned to every one of his Preists five markes by the year besides his Bed and Chamber and the Master forty pounds by the yeare and this certified in the Book of first fruits and tenths Rectoriam Collegium of Greystock and the said Colledge was in being five years before the Act of 1. E. 6. And it was resolved by all the Judges that such a reputative Colledge was not given to the King by the Act of 1. E. 6. because it had no lawfull beginning nor the countenance of a lawfull beginning for the Pope cannot found or incorporate a Colledge within this Realme nor to assigne or license others to assigne temporall livings to it for it ought to be done by the King and no other for the name doth suffice if the matter be not of right or deed Dier 81. Quando duo jura in una persona concurrunt aequum est ac si essent in diversis Reg. I. C. Ployd f. 368. a. when two rights concur meet together in one person it is all one as if they were in severall persons As if one hath an estate for the life of A. the remainder to him for the life of B. the remainder to him for the life of C. and he is disseised and the disseisor levieth
by discontinuance disseisin abatement c. and of this right is the saying to be understood that the right descendeth and not the Land which may be released to him in possession and this right is also called jus proprietatis as if a man be disseised of an Acre of Land the disseisee hath jus proprietatis and the Disseisor hath jus possessionis and if the Disseisee release to the Disseisor he hath jus proprietatis possessionis Coke com 266. a. but the reservation of a Rent upon such a release is voyd as if the disseisee release to the disseisor of Land reserving a rent the reservation is voyd Coke com 144. b. Neither can a bare right a right of entry or a thing in action be granted or transferred to a stranger by the ancient maxime of the Common Law Coke com f. 166. for that thereby is avoyded great oppression injury and injustice but if a bare right happen to be forfeited to the King he may grant the same by his Prerogative Frustra est potentia quae nunquam venit in actum Vaine is the possibility which never commeth into act Coke l. 2. f. 501. There is jus proprietatis possessionis possibilitatis and the right of possibility which dependeth upon the death of a man hath a necessary and common intendment to wit necessary in regard that all the issues of Adam must dye for statutum est omnibus hominibus semel mori and common because the death may happen at such a time that the contingency may take effect and this necessary and common possibility is called potentia propinqua which may come into act and is not therefore vaine or voyd in Law as in 15 H. 7. 10. If Lands be given to a marryed man and a marryed woman and to the heires of their two bodies ingendred this is a good estate in tail for it is of necessity that death shall ensue and in common possibility that one shall dye before the other so as the marryage may ensue but in the same case there shall not be possibility upon possibility and therefore if land be given to one man and two women there the Law shall not intend that first he shall marry one and then that shee that he shall marry shall dye and that he shall espouse the other and therefore in this case they have severall inheritances at the beginning as if Land be given to two barons and their femes and the heires of their bodies engendred in this case the Law shall not expect second marriages and therefore in this case they shall have joynt estates for life and one baron and feme one moyety in tail in common with the other baron and feme of the other moyety and so severall inheritances and with it accordeth 24. E. 3. 29. for otherwise there should be possibility upon possibility and if a man give Land to baron and feme there is an apparent possibility that they shall have issue but if after they be divorced causa praecontractus so as the possibility is dissolved the Law shall never expect the second marriage for by the divorce they have but an estate of Frank-tenement 4. H. 7. 16. 17. And a woman may enfeoff a married man causa matrimonij prae locuti for it is of necessity that death shall ensue and in common possibility that the Feme of the Feoffee shall dye before the Feoffee So in the common case of a lease for life the remainder to the right heires of I. S. the remainder is good for the necessary and common intendement vide ibidem plura in Lampets case Coke l. 10. f. 50. b. For the Law respecteth the right of possibility and will have nothing to be void that by possibility may be good As a mesnalty is given in tail reserving a rent this is good for the tenancy may escheate to the donee and then the doner shall distraine for all the arrearages 1. H. 4. 2. A man hath issue a daughter and leaveth his wife privement enseint the wife may detaine the Charters of her husbands Lands from the Daughter for the possibility it may be a Son shee goeth withall 41. E. 3. 21. b. But if A. be indebted to B. in two hundred pounds and delivereth goods to him to sell to pay his debt in the best manner he can and he is proferred two hundred pounds for them and refuseth and after selleth them for an hundred pounds A. shall answer the residue of the debt notwithstanding this possibility 18. E. 4. 5. But the possibility must be propinque and a common possibility as death or dying without issue or coverture or the like but if it be a remote possibility the Law doth judge it vaine because it shall not be intended by common intendement to happen as a remainder to a corporation which is not at the time of the limitation and remainder is void though such a corporation was after erected during the particular estate for that was potentia remota 9. H. 6. 24. For as Ployd f. 345. a. b. It is a principle in Law that all gifts be it by devise or otherwise they ought to have a donee in esse and not in posse who hath capacity to take them given when it ought to vest as devise of Lands in fee and so of goods if the devise dye before the devisor neither his Heire or Executor shall gaine any thing by this Will vide ibidem plura in Brets case So if a lease be made for life the remainder to the right heires of I. S. if at the limitation of the remainder there be not any such I. S. but during the life of tenant for life I. S. is borne and dyeth his heire shall never take as it is agreed in 2. H. 7. 13. And so in 11. E. 3. 46. the case was that upon a fine levied to R. he granted and rendred the tenements to one I. and F. his wife for their lives the remainder to G. the Son of I. in tail the remainder to the right heires of I. and at the time levied I. had not any son named G. but after he had issue named G. and in praecipe against F. it was adjudged that G. should not take the remainder in tail because he was not borne at the time of the fine levied but long after by which another who was right heire of I. S. was received for when I. had not any son named G. at the time of the fine levied the law doth not expect that he shal have a Son named G. after for that is potentia remota a remote possibility But if the remainder had been limited by a generall name as to the right heirs of I. or primogenito filio such a remainder might have been good for the common possibility But if a remainder be contrary to Law the Law shall never adjudge a grant good by reason of a possibility or expectation of a thing which is contrary to Law for that is potentia
except in case where the Owner is bound to inclose 4. E. 4 19. 10. E. 4. 7. But if a man erect a wall part on my Land and part on his own if I distroy that on my Land and the rest by that meanes falleth downe it is excusable If a Feoffment be made to two joyntly one of them cannot dereigne the warranty without the other 48. E. 3. 17. Yet if a villaine and another purchase joyntly and the Lord of the villaine enter into a moyety he may dereigne the Warranty alone for therein the severance groweth by act in Law He that commeth into a Taverne and will not goe out in reasonable time or distraine for rent and killeth the distresse shall be a wrong doer ab initio 12. E. 4. 8. Because he misdemeaneth that the authority the Law giveth him Otherwise it is if I lend my horse to one to ride to York and he rideth him further yet the riding further is not unlawfull neither a generall action of Trespass lyeth against him upon the accord upon the case because he misdemeaneth but the authority that another hath given him Finch Nomot f. 47. If I be distrained and pay my rent and after am denied to have my goods delivered an action of Trespasse or detinue lyeth 21. H. 7. If I deliver a chest to one who breaketh it Trespasse lyeth 2. H. 8. If a Sheriff maketh an arrest and returneth not the Capias an action of Trespasse lyeth 8. E. 49. An executor commandeth the taking of the goods of the Testator and refuseth to prove the will a Trespasse lyeth 8. E. 4. 9. The Sheriff seiseth the goods of one outlawed and doth not charge himselfe in account the Outlawry being reversed or the party pardoned he shall have an action of Trespasse against the Sheriff 21. H. 7. 23. Injuria illata incorpus non potest remitti Reg. I. C. injury which is offered to the body cannot be remitted and the reason given by the Civilians is quia nemo membrorum suorum Dominus because no man is Lord and Master of his members but the power of them appertaine to God our Creator and the Prince our Protector which accordeth with the reason of the common Law which maintaineth as Bracton saith quod cita membra sunt in postate Regis as it is in the record of 19. E. 1. Rot. 36. vita membra sunt in manu Regis that the life and member of every Subject are under the safe-guard and protection of the King to the intent they may serve the King and their Country when occasion shall be offered Nay the Lord of a villaine for the cause aforesaid cannot maihme his villaine but the King shall punish him for mayming of his Subjects by Fine Ransome and Imprisonment untill the Fine and Ransome be paid for that hereby he hath disabled him to doe the King service Coke com f. 127. a. And therefore also doth the Law more carefully provide for the preventing and punishing of such forcible injury in particular between person and person because as Coke com f. 161. b. Max. paci sunt contraria vis injuria forcible injuries are most contrary to the quiet and repose of the Common-wealth which is the publick felicity both of Prince and people As if one doe but menace another with a weapon or staff or if he stretch out his arme or give any other token whereby his intention of striking doth appeare though never a stroake be given yet is it actionable 22. Ass Pl. 60. And upon an assault the Writ was Quare insultum fecit vulneravit maihemavit and though the injury did not appear to be a maihm yet was it allowed 43 E. 4. For the Law favoreth the Plaintiff in such Actions And though force be an enemy to peace yet is it a maxime in our Law Quod quisque in tutelam corporis sui fecerit jure fecisse videatur Fulb. l. 1. f. 91. whatsoever any one doth in defence of his body it seemeth to be done by Law according to the opinion of the Poet. Judice me fraus est concessa repellere fraudâ—m A maque in armatos sumere jura sinunt I doe conceive it a good fraud to be To repell fraud and lawfull eke for me To take up armes ' gainst those I armed see As 2. H. 4 8. Bract. If any man beat me I may lawfully beat him if I cannot escape without stâ—ips wounds or maihmes Nay 9. E 4. 3. I may beate him in defence of my goods or wife contrary to the resolve of 43. Ass 39. That it is not lawfull for me to beat him if I may escape with my life And 9. E 4. A servant may justify a battery in defence of his Master and 17. E. 4. 4. He that cometh in company of him who maketh the assault or cometh in to aid him is a principall Trespassor and if a Justice of Peace see a man doing of an assault he may presently arrest him by commandment or word to the intent that he may find surety of peace 9. E. 4. 3 And by the civill Law if any one do keep or nourish a Masty Dog Beare or Fox or some like beast which doth hurt or damnify another man he that receiveth the hurt shall recover damages against the Owner of the beast Fulb. l. 1. f. 81. And so at the common Law if a man hath a Dog which killeth Sheep and hath notice of the condition of the Dog the master shall be punished for it as may be gathered out of Dyer 28. H. 8. f. 25. Pl. 162. Otherwise if he be ignorant thereof or if it be done without the Masters incitation ibidem f. 19. And whereas in many cases that concerne Lands and Goods the Law doth deprive a man of present remedy and rather then to suffer an inconvenience turneth him over to a further remedy yet if the question be of a personall paine the Law doth give him present remedy because he holdeth no damage a sufficient remedy for a corporall injury which ground as Sir Francis Bacon ingâ—niously observeth some of the Canonists do aptly inferr out of Christs sacred mouth Amen corpus est suâ—ra vestimentum verily the body is more worth then rayment where they say vestimentum comprehendeth all outward things appertaining to a mans condition as Lands and Goods which they say are not in the same degree with that which is corporall Bacon Max. f. 30. As if a Sheriff make a false returne whereby I loose my Land yet because of the inconvenience of drawing things to delays if the Sheriffs returne should not be credited I am excluded of my averrement against it and am put to my action of deceite against the Sheriff and Summoners 5. E. 4. 80. But if the Sheriff upon a Capias returne a Cepy Corpus quod languidus est in prisona I may come in and falsify the returne of the Sheriff to save my imprisonment 3. H. 6. 3. So if a man
tenant of the Land to be summoned whereas he was not summoned and the tenant looseth by default upon the grand Cape returned the tenant may have a writ of deceit against the recoverer and against the Sheriff for his false returne F. N. B. 97. C. and may defeate the judgement and no damages shall be recovered against the Sheriff in such case onely he shall be fined 5. E. 4 4â— And if he dye his heire may have an action of deceite and restitution of the Land 8. H. 6.5 If a man bargaine with another and assume upon consideration to enfeoff him of ceraine Land and he enfeoffeth another he to whom the assumpsit was made may have an action of deceite or an action upon the case at his pleasure 3. H. 7.14 If one selleth to another a horse which he knoweth to have a secret disease in his body or selleth Corne which is full of gravell an action of deceite lyeth 20. H. 6.36 without warranty but F.N.B. 94. C. is of the contrary opinion If the Sheriff arrest the body by a Capias ad respondendum and returneth not the Writ the party shall have an action of false imprisonment Kell way f. 3. b. The Law ordaineth that he who will be sure of his goods shall buy them in Market overt and that sale shall bind all strangers as well as vendors and yet it is agreed in 33. H. 6. That sale in open Market shall not bind him who hath right to the goods if the sale be by fraud or the Vendee hath notice that the property of the goods appertaineth to another So the Law hath ordained the Court of the common Pleas as Market-overt for the assurances of Lands by fine so as he that will be assured of Land not onely against the Vendor but against all strangers it is good for him to passe it in this Market-overt by fine yet Covin and deceite shall avoid it overt by fine yet Covin and deceite shall avoid it 〈…〉 a Feoffment by Covin which amounteth to a wrong and disseisin Fine levyed by him who is particeps criminis and who had not nor pretended to have any right to the land shall not be a bar to the Lessor Coke l. 3. f. 78. Fermors Case A resignation made by an Abbot by covin shall not abate the Writ 4 E. 2. 22. A covenous Conveyance that assets shall not descend is not of force 34 E. 3. 19. 19 E. 2. 3. And 17 E. 3.59 That an estate made to the King and Letters patents granted over and all it by covin between him that granted to the King and the Patentee to make an evasion out of the Statute of Mortmaine shall not bind but shall be repealed A presentation obtained by fraud and deceit is voyd Dyer 339. b. Letters of administration obtained by fraud and covin are voyd and shall not repeale the former administration Dyer 339. a. vide Dyer 295. many Cases there put concerning covin If I sell to one cloath and warrant it to be of such a length and it is not of such a length the buyer may have an action of the case against me by vertue of the warranty although the warranty be by word and not written but if the warranty be made at some other time after the bargaine he may not have a Writ of deceit unlesse it be made by writing F. N. B. 98. k. If a man sell to one Seeds and warranteth them to be of another Countrey if they be not a Writ of deceit lyeth but if he warrant that the Horse which he selleth should go fifty miles in a day or that the Seeds shall grow it is otherwise And a Writ of deceit lyeth for selling of corrupt Victuall without warranty but not for selling of rotten Sheep though it be with warranty but to warrant a thing which is evident to sense as to be black which is blew is voyd unlesse the buyer be blind or the thing which is bought be absent 11 E. 4 7. 3 H. 4. 1. If I sell one certaine Pipes of Wine and warrant them to be good and they be corrupt the Vendee may have an action of the case against the Vendor F.N.B. 99. b. Yet according to the opinion of some an action will lye without warranty 7 H. 4. 14. But Master Fitzherbert saith that there ought to be a warranty and his taste ought to be his judge in such case and where it is with warranty the Writ must say that the Defendant at the time of the warranty made knew that the Wine which he sold was corrupt A Writ of deceit was brought for selling a certain quantity of Wooll and warranting it to be fifty sacks whereas it wanted of that measure the Defendant pleaded in bar that it was weighed before the sale and the servants of the Plaintiffe being his Factors did accept of it and carryed it beyond the Sea whereupon the Plaintiff demurred 13 H. 4. 1. Semper qui dolo fecit quominus haberet pro eo habendus est ac si habet Reg. J. C. Alwayes whosoever shall give or grant any thing by fraud whereby he may seem not to have it he is to be esteemed as if he hath it And therefore if a man by fraud make a Deed of gift of all his goods to one of his Creditors to deceive the rest the gift by the Statute of 13 Eliz. is voyd Twins case l. 3. f. 81 quod vide where you shall finde the signes and marks of fraud accurately and fully discovered And Coke l. 5. f. 60. a. b. debt against the heire upon an obligation the Defendant pleaded Riens per descent the Plaintiff replyed that he had Assets in D. c. and the Plaintiff giveth in evidence that the father dyed seised of lands in fee the Defendant sayd that he aliened before the Writ the Plaintif averred by covin and proved that it was done by fraud to defraud the Plaintiff and therefore it was resolved to be voyd by the Statute of 13 Eliz. c. 5. and that the fraud might be wel given in evidence because the Statute saith that the estate as to the Creditors shall be voyd and therefore shall be taken by favourable interpretation for to suppresse fraud and that it shall be mischeivous to the Creditors and increase maintenance and covin if the Plaintif should be driven to plead that the Feoffment was by fraud because it is commâ—nly hatched in arbore cava and so artificially covered and concealed that the party grieved hath no meanes to find and know it and therefore jâ—dgment was given for the Plaintiff viâ—â—e ibidem And Burrels case l. 6. f. 730. a. and l. 8. f 133. in Turners case So Hobart f. 72. Humbertons Case Humberton recovered a debt against T H. and dyed and upon a Scire facias against the Ter tenants the Sheriff returned J. H. Tenant of an house that was his at the time of the judgement and J. H. came in and pleaded that T. H.
making of the banks of a River to be contributory to it for Qui sentit commodum c. Coke l. 7. f. 39. b. If a man grant a Rent-charge for life out of his land and the rent is behind and the Grantor enfeoff A. and the rent is behind in his time and after A. enfeoffeth B. and the rent is behind in his time and then the Grantee dyeth the Executor shall have an action of debt against every of them for the rent behind in his time for qui sâ—ntit commodum c. and so was it holden in Ognels case l. 4. f. 49. a. 50. Barons uses f. 27. If a man bind himself and his Heires in an Obligation or do covenant in writing for him and his Heires or do grant an annuity for him and his Heirs or do make a Warranty of land binding him and his Heires to warranty in all these cases the Heir after the death of the Ancestor is by Law charged with this Obligation Covenant Annuity and Warranty yet with these three cautions 1. That the party must by speciall name bind himself and his Heires 2. That some action must be brought against the Heir whilest the land or other inheritance rested in him unaliened except the land was conveyed away by fraud and one purpose to prevent the Suit intended against him And 3. That no Heire is further to be charged then the value of the land descended unto him from the same Ancestor c. nor to be sold out-right for the debt to be kept in extent at a yearely value untill the debt or damage be run out Neverthelesse for his false plea shall he be charged of his own lands for this Deed of his Ancestor and the reason of this charge is Qui sentit commodum sentire debet incommodum onus vide ibidem plura Dilationes sunt in lege odiosae Ployd f. 75. b. Delaies are tedious in the Law and therefore doth the Law favour Assise because they are the more speedy Suits the Law hath given as the Statute of W. 2. c. 25. in its recitall saith Et quia non est aliquod breve in Cancelaria per quod quaerentes habent tam festinum remedium sicut per breve Nove disseisinae And therefore because it is the more speedy Suit the Law the more greatly favoureth it ibidem For for speed to the Plaintiff the Jurors shal have the view before appearance by the words of the Writ And though Warranties are favoured in Law yet none shall vouch in Assise any one if he be not present and that is for the speed of the Plaintiff No. Nat. br f. 178. And a protection will not defend the party against an assise but assises are accepted by the words of protection p. 2. H. 6. 42. Bâ— protection 53. And all things and pleas which go in retardation or abatement of Assises are esteemed odious and therefore exceptions which will abate other Writs shall not abate Assises if it be so that there is a Disseisor and a Tenant for it is the substance of the Suit and therefore the misnaming of one of the Defendants shall not abate the assise if there be another Disseisin and Tenant and yet the Writ was alwaies false Ploâ—d f. 98. a. b. And if the Tenant plead Joynt-tenancy with a stranger not named although the Plaintiff confesse it yet it shall not abate his assise but for it onely for the remnant the Writ and Plaint shall stand in his force and yet the Plaint was altogether false and if there be a Disseisor and Tenant for any part then it sufficeth for other verity in the Writ or Plaint the Law requireth none and to say that one named in the Writ is dead before the Writ purchased or that there was never any such in rerum natura is alone and shall be adjudged no plea in abatement of the Writ but if there be another Disseisor and a Tenant the Writ shall be good against them Ployd f 90. a. vide ibidem plura And though in actions reall as the weight of the cause requireth there are longer times given in their proceedings then in personall actions yet it appeareth by Fortescue de lib. l. A. c. 5. 3. that they are not too long nor admitted without just cause Crebro enim saith he deliberationibus iuâ—icia matur scunt sed in accelerato processu numquam And as Hobert saith f. 133. Festinatio jâ—stitiae est nâ—verca infortunii Festination of Justice is the step-mother of mischief but many times by deliberations Judgments grow to ripenesse but in over hasty processe never yet the Demandant shall come to a finall end by these actions which he shall never do by prosecution of personall actions for the tryall of a Freehold or Inheritance Co. ep ad lectorem lib. 8. And in all cases the Law favoureth speeding of mens Causes and hateth delayes as 3 H. 6. 15. b. He that pleadeth a Record in delay as to prove the Plaintiff excommunicate must have it ready to shew but otherwise it is if he plead in bar In dilatory pleas both Defendants must joyne 12 H. 7. 1. A Plea in bar that is dilatory must be good to every common intent 8 H. 7. 9. One who is in Court ready to joyn with the Defendant may do it without processe As the Vouchee the Plaintiffs Lessor being prayed in aid of when the Defendant in a Replevin avoweth upon him or the Mesne when the Lord Paramount voweth upon him But Joynder in aid cannot be by an Attorney without processe 2 H. 6. 1. b. One who is a Debtor to the King of Record in the Exchequer if he be seen in the Court may be brought in to answer 2 H. 6 4. b. An assise of Darrein presentment was brought and it was pleaded in abatement of the Writ that the same Plaintiff had brought a Quare impedit against the Defendant for the same Church and the Court was of opinion that it was a good plea for the Quare impedit is of an higher nature for the right and possession and the Statute of W. 2. l. 5. saith that it may be in the election of one to have an assise of Darrein-presentment or a Quare impedit ergo not both And it was adjudged p. 15 Jaco that one cannot have two Quare Impedits of one Church for one avoidance Hutton f. 403. When the Law giveth a man severall remedies for a thing he cannot have both of them together as Littleton saith for then he should recover one thing twice which should be a double charge and a double vexation to the Defendant Co. Com. 145. a. as if I grant by Deed a Rent-charge to another the Grantee hath election to bring a Writ of Annuity and charge the person onely to make it personall or to distrain upon the land and make it reall but he cannot have both after the Grantee hath determined his election but this determination of election must be by action in
sub eo ipse sub nullo nisi tantum sub Deo Bract. l. 1. c. 8. The King is the Vicar and Minister of God upon earth every one is under him and he under none but onely under God and therefore the Lands which are in the Kings possession are free from tenure for a tenant is he which holdeth of some superior Lord by some service so as the King cannot be a tenant because he hath no superior but God for as Coke l. 8 f. 118. It would be against common right and reason that the King should hold of any or doe service to any of his Subjects and therefore all Lands holden of him mediately or immediately Co. com f. 1. and for which reason Cowell thought it not so proper in the Kings case to say that he is seised in dominico suo ut de feodo as if feodum in our Law was taken as it is in the fendall Law onely for the Lands held in Services whereas feodum as Bracton Britton Fleta and Littleton tels us idem est quod haereditas Davis case of Tenures f. 30. Neither can the King be a Joynt-tenant with any though it be of land or other things that he had in his body naturall for none can be equall with him And therefore if two purchase lands to them and their heirs and one be made King they are no more Joynt-tenants but Tenants in Common 3 Eliz 339. Nay Acts of Parliament do not bind him unless they concern the Common-wealth or he be specially named 4. E. 4 21. 1 Eliz. 223. And no man can declare against the King but he must sue by way of Petition Ployd f. 241. b. 18 Eliz 498. He hath the property of all Goods that are nullius in bonis and shall have all Tythes out of Forrests and places out of any Parish for rex est persona mixta cum sacerdote In a Writ of Error upon false Judgment given for the King no Scire facias shall go forth ad audiendum errores for the King is alwaies in Court and that is the cause that the form of Entry is in all Suits for the King in the name of his Attorney generall F.N.B. 21. b. Rex semper praesumitur attendere ardua negotia regni pro publico bono omnium Coke l. 5. f. 56. a. It is alwaies presumed that the King doth attend the weighty and hard things of the Kingdome for the publick good of all And therefore have the Grants of the King a more beneficiall interpretation then the Grants of the Subject that may attend their private Affaires which are alwaies taken more strongly against them As if the King do grant lands to I.S. and his Heirs and in truth I. S. is the Kings Villain that shall not enfranchise the Villain by Implication The same Law is of an Alien born 17. E. 3. 39. The Advowson of Pravondry holden of the King was aliened to an Abbot and his Successors and that the Successors shall hold the Provandry to their own use The King shall seise the Advowson for Alienation in Mortmain and destroy the Appropriation for he shall not be ousted of his right of Advowson by Implication So 2 R. 2. 4. If two be indebted to the King and the King release to one it shall not discharge the other for no prejudice shall accrue to the King by construction or implication upon his Grant more then he truly intended by it ibidem So if a release be made by him of all demands the right of Inheritance shall not be released 6 H. 7. 15. If the King granteth lands in fee upon condition that they do not alien it is good but in all these cases it is otherwise in the case of a common person And in many cases the King who claimeth by a Subject shall be in a better case in respect of the Prerogative incident to his Royall person then the Subject himself by whom he claimeth As if the King have a Rent-seck by Attainder of Treason or by Grant he shall distrain for it not onely in the land charged but also in all his other lands and yet the Subject by whom he claimeth shall not distrain If a Subject have Recognizance or an Obligation and after is outlawed or attainted the King shall seise all the land of the Conusor or Obligor where he himself can have but the Moyety the King shall take advantage of a Condition broken without demand whereas a common person who claimeth under the King cannot re-enter for non payment of Rent without demand made And if the King purchaseth a Lordship of which land is holden by posteriority the King shall have the priority vide ibidem plura in Knights case Davis f. 45. If a common person grant rent or any other thing which lieth in grant onely without limitation of any estate by the delivery of the deed only a Frank-tenement shall passe 17 E. 3. 43. a. If the King grant rent or land without the limitation of any estate the Grant is meerly void for the incertainty 7 Ass pl. 1. and the Grantee shall not be Tenant at Will as it is ruled in the case of Alton Wood. Ployd f. 243. The Grant of the King is taken more strongly against a stranger and more favourable to the King although the thing granted come to the King by purchase or descent Whereas it is otherwise of a common person As a grant of a Mannor by the King the Advowson shall not passe without speciall words So the King may grant a thing in action which another cannot So if the part of an entire thing commeth to the King the Common Law hath given him all As if an Obligation be made to two and one is outlawed the King shall have all the duty So he shall have an entire Horse or Oxe which one who is outlawed holdeth in Common ibidem So Coke l. 9. f. 129. b. Quando jus domini regis subditi in simul concurrunt jus regis preferri debet when the right of the King and the Subject concur and meet together the right of the King ought to be preferred as in Dame Hales case Baron and Feme Joynt tenants of a term for years the Baron is felo de se the Baron shall forfeit all Ployd Com. 262. vide ibidem plura in Quicks case The King may mend his Declaration that term that it is put in p. 13 E. 48. So the King may wave his Demurrer and traverse the plea of another M. 28 H. 6. f. 2. So if the King grant lands in fee with Warranty against all the Patentee shall not have value in recovery without express words to have value So the King may make a Lease to a stranger this reservation is good and the stranger shall distrain for it or have an action of debt after the Lease determined M. 35. H. 6. f. 36. Ployd f. 243. a. So for arrearages of Rent-charge granted to the King he may distrain in all other
lands of the Grantor H. 13 E. 4. f. 6. So if the Title appeareth to the King upon Plea of other parties the Court of Office shall adjudge it for the King though he be not party to the Issue Ployd f. 243. b. vide ibidem plura And as the Common Law cannot bind the King no more can private Customes and therefore the custome of that if one pawn Goods that he that hath the pawn shall hold them whose soever they be untill the mony for which they were pawned be paid unto him shall not bind the King where his goods were pawned by a stranger So sale of goods made by a stranger â—n Market-overt shall not alter the property nor bind him M. 3. H. 6. 28. And if a man have wrack of the Sea if the Goods of the King be wracked he shall gain no property by it against the King And so it is of Prescription to have goods waved or estrayed M. 35 H. 6. 27. Ployd ibidem vide plura Nullum tempus occurrit regi Ployd f. 243. No Prescription of time runs against the King As if right of entry descend to the King and the Disseisor dieth seised it shall not take away the entry of the King M. 35. H. 6. 27. So if a Villain alien his land the Lord may enter when he pleaseth Coke com f. 41. b. If Tenant for life or Tenant in Dower grant over his or her estate and the Grantee dieth there shall be an Occupant but against the King there shall be no Occupant because nullum tempus occurrit regi Coke l. 6 f. 29. b. At the Common Law if any one had usurped upon the King and his Presentee had been admitted instituted and inducted for without Induction the Church is not full against the King yet the King may have a Quare Impedit and by it he shall remove the Incumbent for no act of the Bishop or any other can bar the King of his right nullum tempus c. vide ibidem plura Ployd 243. a. Coke l. 7. f. 28. If Title to present by Lapse be devolved to the Queen and the Patron presenteth a Clark who is admitted instituted and inducted and dieth the King hath lost his Title to present by Lapse for the King had but unam unicam presentationem hac vice which cannot be extended to the second avoidance and the statute de prerogativa regis quod nullum tempus occurrie regi is to be understood when the King hath a certain permanent interest and not when he hath an interest specially limited vide ibidem plura in Baskerviles case All which proceed from the Prerogative the Common Law giveth the Prince which is so large Nom. f. 85. Davis in his Preface as Sir Henry Finch saith that you shall find that to be Law almost in every case of the King that is Law in no case of the Subject And therefore Sir John Davis confidently averreth that the Common Law doth excell all other Lawes in upholding a free Monarchy which is the most excellent form of Government exalting the Prerogative Royall and being tender and watchfull to preserve it And yet maintaining all the ingenuous libertie of the Subject Davis ibidem But though the Common Law allow so many Prerogatives to the King yet shall he not hurt others by them As if a Bridge be repairable by the Subject and is in decay the pardon of the King shall not excuse him who ought to do it because others to wit the Subjects of the Realm have an interest in it So if one have Jewels in pawn for ten pounds and he that putteth them to pawn is attainted the King shall not have the Jewels unless he pay ten pounds for his Prerogative will not prejudice another Ployd f. 487. a. b. So the Earle of Kent had the return of certain Cattell in Replevin in 13 R. 2. and the Proprietor of the Cattell was attainted There it is holden that the Earle of Kent shall retaine the Cattell against the King untill he is satisfied for the thing and the Prerogative of the King will not discharge them of the return because the Prerogative will not give prejudice to another vide ibidem plura in Nichols case Rex est caput salus reipublicae a capite bona valetudo transit in omnes Coke l. 4. f. 124. b. The King is the head and safety of the Common-weale and as from the head health is conveyed to the body so from the King safety is conveyed to the Common-weale which is the body of the Kingdome for from him Justice is distilled to all by which all men are preserved in peace and safety as Ployd f. 242. b. All justice tranquility and repose is derived from him as the Fountain of it and therefore by Bracton he is called Author juris L. 3. c. 9. the Author of right by whom right is separated from injury equity from iniquity that all subject to him may live honestly that not one should hurt another and that to every one what is his be by a right contribution restored And by Homer 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Gods Schollars and by a more divine Poet Gods themselves especially because they sit on Gods own Seat when they minister justice to the people Dixi quod dii estis and that the Rules of Justice be their principall Lesson Which like the Sun in the Firmament to which Justice is rightly resembled he is to communicate to all the Creatures of his Common-weale And as the King is the Sun and Fountain of Justice so are the Judges and Professors of the Law but Conduit Pipes to convey the streames of his Justice throughout all the Kingdome L. 4 Ep ad l. A. Chron. 19.6 7. Whereupon Sir Edward Coke hath this observation from the divine Text videte Judices Take heed you Judges what yee do for yee judge not for man but for the Lord who is with you in the Judgment wherefore let the fear of the Lord be upon you take heed and do it for there is no iniquity with the Lord our God nor respect of persons nor taking gifts And so saith he must every Judge be just without respect to give every man his own Protectio trahit subjectionem subjectio protectionem Coke l. 7. f. 5. Calv. case Protection draweth subjection and subjection protection Legiance is the mutuall Bond and Obligation between the King and his Subjects whereby Subjects are called his leige Subjects because they are bound to obey and serve him and he is called their leige Lord because he shall maintain and defend them And as there ought to be a mutuall connexion of dominion and fidelity between the Lord and Tenant ita quod quantum debet domino ex homagio tantum illi debet dominus ex dominio as Glanvil saith so that how much the Tenant oweth the Lord by homage and service so much doth the Lord owe the Tenant by his power and
within a Mannor time out of minde of man used was to grant parcell of the said Mannar in Fee-simple and never any grant was made to the heir of his body for life or for yeares and the Lord of the said Mannor did grant to one by copy for life the remainder over to another and the heires of his body and was adjudged that the grant and remainder over was good because the Lord having a custome and interest withal might grant a lesser estate for in this custome which enableth him to doe the greater enableth him to doe the lesse Coke com f. 52. b. for omne majus continet in se minns and regularly it is true that where a man doth that which he ought to doe and more there it is good for that which is warranted and void for the rest Coke com 258. a. As if a Letter of Attorney be made to I. S. to make livery of seisin in white acre and he maketh livery in white acre and black acre there he doth idem aliud and therefore it is good for white acre that is according to his authority and void for black acre which is aliud from his authority Perk. 38. But otherwise it had been if the Letter of Attorny were to make livery of one acre and he maketh livery of two acres there it is void for both because it is not named in certaine in the Feoffment of which acre livery shall be made according to 4. H. 7. And so regularly it is true that where a man doth the same thing he is authorized to doe alio modo in another manner then the authority doth warrant there it is void for the whole Davis in case of tenures f. 21. As if I command a man to make a Feoffment in my name according to a copy shewed in Latine and he maketh a Feoffment to the same effect in English it is without warrant because he doth not pursue the authority in the same Mannor 10. H. 7. 9. So a Letter of Attorney is made to deliver seisin after the death of I. S. and the Attorney maketh seisin during the life of I. S. all is void 40. Ass 38. Authorities by Deed are to be pursued strictly and precisely both for matter and manner Davis ibidem f. 17. The Plaintiff did make a charter of Feoffment to the tenant and a Letter of Attorny to deliver livery of seisin the Attorney delivereth seisin upon condition this livery is void for the authority is not pursued in the same manner 12. Ass 24. 26. So on the contrary if the Letter of Attorney had been to deliver seisin upon condition and the Attorney maketh livery without condition this is void Co. Just 258. 11. H. 4. 3. So where an authority is given to enfeoff and he levieth a fine 10. H 7. 15. It is void Omne mandatum est temporaneum Reg. I. C. all commands are temporary and are extinguished by death which is the difference that the Civilians put between an authority and a command and that the commande is determined by the death of him that commandeth but not the authority as by these verses is signified Praeceptum non pracipitat mors praecipientis Mandatum mandatore cadente cadit But some hold opinion that they both expire by the death of him that commandeth or giveth authority which Fulbech saith is more agreeable to our Law especially in matters of Bailship of which notwithstanding these diversities may be observed A man deviseth all his lands to his Sister except one Mannor which he appointeth to pay his debts and he made two Executors and dieth the one Executor dieth yet the other may sell the Mannor and pay his debts Dyer 371. But if a Letter of Attorney be made to deliver Livery of Seisin after the death of the Feoffor the Letter of Attorney is void Coke com f. 52. b. And if a Mayor and Comminalty maketh a Charter of Feoffment and a Letter of Attorney to deliver Seisin the Livery and Seisin is good after the death of the Mayor because the Corporation dieth not But if the Lessor by his Deed licence the Lessee for life or for years to alien and the Lessor dieth before the Lessee doth alien yet is death no countermand of the licence but that he may alien for this licence was executed on the part of the lessor as much as may be M. 3. Jac. c. 23. And so if the King doth licence to alien in Mortmain and dieth the Licence may be executed afterward Coke ibidem There is a diversity between authorities created by the party for private uses and an authority created by Law for execution of Iustice As for example if a man deviseth that his two Executors shall sell his land if one of them dyes the Survivor shal not sell it but if he had devised his lands to his Executors to be sold there the Survivor shall sell it coke com f. 181. b. And if a man make a Letter of Attorney to two to do any Act if one of them dye the Survivor shall not do it But if a Venire facias be made to foure Coroners to impanell and return a Iury and one of them dye yet the other shall execute and return the same vide ibidem plura And if there be two joynt Attorneys to return Livery for another and livery of Seisin is made to one of them in the name of both this is void unless the Warrant be joyntly and severally Coke com f. 49. l. vide ibidem plura Mandata licita strictam recipiunt interpretationem sed illicita latam extensam Bacon Max. 60. lawfull Commands receive a strict interpretation but unlawfull large and extensive In committing of lawfull authority to another a man may limit it as strictly as he pleaseth and if the party authorised do transgress his authority though it be in circumstance expressed it shall be in most cases void in the whole act as hath before been demonstrated and distinguished But when a man is the Author and advisor to another to commit any unlawfull act then he shall not excuse himself by circumstances pursued Therefore if I make a Letter of Attorney to I. S. to deliver Livery and Seisin in the capitall Messuage and he doth it in another place of the land or between the hours of two and three and he doth it after or before in these cases the act of the Attorney as to execute the estate is void Or if I express the Seisin to be delivered to I.D. and my Attorney deliver it to I.B. it is void but if my Attorney maketh it to his Attorney it shall be intended for it is a Livery to him in Law But on the other side if I command I. S. to rob I. D. on Shooters-hill and he doth it on Gads-hill or to rob him such a day and he doth it not himself but procureth another to do it or to kill by poyson and he doth it by violence in all these cases he
their Predecessors but excuse themselves and answer for their proper fact and demeanor for it is a common erudition that the Defendant in his answer and bar ought either to traverse or confess and avoid the Plaintiff vide ibidem plura Yet in Treasons and Felonies one shall be punished for anothers offence and by our Law and not without good reason the Sons of them which are disloyall Subjects and Traytors to their Prince are barred from the Inheritance of their Ancestors that their Fathers infamy may alwaies accompany them and that their life should be a punishment to them and their Fathers fault a continuall corasive and that is done because their Fathers Ulcers are feared in them and that being bred and brought up of naughty Parents they will be prone to do the like and this penalty is used in the nature of a medicine that by suffering shame he may be deterred from crime and therefore as Coke com 5. f. 391. l. by his attainder of Treason or Felony is the blood so stained and corrupted that his Children cannot be Heires to him nor to any other Ancestor And therefore where the Tenant is outlawed of Felony it is in the Lords election to have a Writ of Escheat supposing that his Tenant was outlawed of Felony or that he died without Heir for by the attainder the blood is corrupted 48 E. 3. 2. But it seemeth by Nichols case that the party attainted ought to be dead before the land can escheat for according to Dyer and Brian in the Kings case after the attainder and till Office be found the Fee-simple shall in facto be in the person of the attainted so long as he shall live for as he hath a capacity to take lands of a new purchase so he hath power to hold his ancient possessions and he shall be Tenant to a Praecipe and if he died before Office found and the land be held of the King the land shall go to the King in nature of a common Escheat Ployd 477. Nichols case but in case of Treason the King shall be presently after the attainder in actual possession without Office found by the Statute of 33 H. 8. c. 20. If the Father purchaseth land and his eldest Son is attainted of Felony and dieth the next in degree of descent and worthiness of blood unto the Son attainted shall not have the land but it shall escheat to the immediate Lord of whom the land is held for the blood is corrupted otherwise it had been if he had died in the life of the Father having no Issue Dyer 48. An account is brought against two the one entreth into an account and it is sound against him it shall bind both 44 E. 3. 18. One is imprisoned in the Marshalsey and a stranger breaketh the Prison and the prisoner escapeth the Marshall shall be charged for the whole debt If I have a way over the lands of twenty men and one of them stoppeth the way in his land I shall have an action against all those over whose lands the way was 33 H. 6. 26. by profit A rate is put upon a Town for the fees of a Knight of the Parliament The Beasts of him hath paid his part are taken for the residue he shall not have a Replevin but the beasts shall be sold to pay his duty 11 H. 4. 2. In quo quis delinquit in eo de jure est puniendus Co. com f. 233. b. In what one offendeth in the same by right he is to be punished As if any Keeper kill any Deer without warrant or fell or cut any Trees or under-woods and committeth them to his own use it is a forfeiture of his Office for the destruction of the Deer is by a mean the destruction of the Venison And so it is if he pull down the Lodge or any house within the Park for putting of Hay into for feeding of the Deer or such like it is a forfeiture and the reason why the Office shall in such and the like case be forfeited because in what one offendeth in that he shall be punished Dispensatio mali prohibeti est de jure Domino regi concessa propter impossibilitatem providendi de omnibus particularibus dispensatio est mali prohibiti provida relaxatio utilitate seu necessitate pensata Coke l. 11. 88. a. The dispensation of a prohibited evill is by right granted or allowed to the King because of an impossibility for providing for all particular things and a dispensation is a provident relaxation of an evill prohibited recompensed with profit and utility As where an Act of Parliament which generally prohibiteth a thing upon penalty which is popular or where it is onely given to the Queen may be inconvenient to divers particular persons in respect of the person place or time c. therfore in such causes the Law hath given power to the Queen to dispense with particular persons But when the wisdome of Parliament hath made an Act to restrain pro bono publico the Importation of any forrein Manufactures to the intent that the Subjects may apply themselves to the making of the said Manufactures c. and by it maintain themselves and families Now for private gaine to grant the importation of them to one or divers against the said Act is a Monopoly and against the Common Law and against the end and scope of the Act it self vide ibidem plura in the case of Monopolies Coke l. 5. f. 28. Cawdrys case By the Ecclesiasticall Lawes of this Realm a Priest cannot have two Benefices nor a Bastard be a Priest but the King by his Ecclesiasticall power and jurisdiction may dispense with both these because they are mala prohibita and not mala in se The King by a clause of non obstante may dispense with the Statute-law and that if the Statute saith that dispensation shall be meerly void 2 H. 7. Grants 73. Finch f. 82. Coke comm f. 120. a. A party or Minister disabled by reason of any corrupt Contract c. by the Act of 13 Eliz. which is an absolute and direct Law cannot be dispensed withall by any Grant c. with a non obstante as it may be when any thing is prohibited sub modoâ— as upon a penalty given to the King Coke l. 4. f. 35. b. in Bozums case when the King by the common Law cannot in any manner make a grant there a non obstante of the common Law will not make the grant good against the reason of the common Law as if the King granteth a protection in an assize or Quod impedit with a non obstante of any Law to the contrary that grant is void for by the common Law a protection doth not lye in any of these cases 39. H. 39. But when the King may lawfully make a grant but the common Law requireth that he may be so instructed that he be not deceived there a non obstante may supply it as when the King
shall give notice of the said felony to some of the Inhabitants of any Village or Hamler next the place where the robbery was done and that if in their pursuit they take any of the Offenders that shall excuse them though they do not take all See there in that Statute the reason of the alteration Co. l. 6. f. 50. a. b. At the common Law a man that had once the benefit of the Clergy shall have it another time and so in infinitum which was remedied by the Act of 4 H. 7. So as the burning in the hand was not to other purpose but to notifie to the Judge whether he had had his Clergy before or no ibid. So if one be attainted at the Common Law for forging false Deeds the King cannot pardon it yet the King may pardon the corporall punishment in case of forgery in the Star-chamber because all Suites in the Star-chamber are but informations for the King though the Suit be exhibited by the party ibidem So before the Statute of 18 Eliz. c. 7. the King might in case of Inditement of Man slaughter pardon the Imprisonment 15 H. 7.9 but not in an appeal but after the Statute of 18 Eliz. by which it is provided that after Clergy allowed and burning in the hand the Prisoner shall presently be enlarged and delivered out of prison It was resolved that that Act did extend as well to the case of appeal as to the case of Inditements otherwise the party shall lawfully be discharged of his punishment and yet remain in perpetual prison ib. vide examen legum Angliae f. 29. Cessante ratione legis câ—ssat lex Coke com f. 70. b. The reason of the Law ceasing the Law it self ceaseth As he that holdeth his land by Escuage when the King maketh a Voyage royall into Scotland to subdue the Scots then he that holdeth by the service of one Knights fee ought to be with the King conveniently arrayed for the War for forty daies c. yet needeth he not go with the King himself if he will find another man and this seemeth to be good reason for it may be he is languishing so that he cannot go nor ride Also an Abbot or another man of religion or a Feme-sole which hold by such services ought not go in proper person Littleton ibidem Quia multa In jure communi propter rationabilem causam omittenda sunt for many things for a reasonable cause are to be omitted If the King give lands to an Abbot and his Successors to hold by Knights service this had been good and shall do homage and fine a man but there was no wardship or releif or other incident belonging thereunto but if the Abbot and his Heirs had conveyed the land to a natural man and his heirs now the wardship releif or other incident belonged of common right to the King So if the King give lands to a Mayor and Comminalty and their successors to be holden in Knights-service the Patentee shall do no homage neither shall there be any wardship or releif onely they shall find a man but if they convey the land to any naturall man and his heirs now marriage homage ward releif or other incidents belong hereunto for the reason of the Law being changed the Law its self is changed and the immunity which was in respect of the body politique by conveyance over ceaseth Coke ibid. Qui rationem in omnibus quaerunt rationem subvertant Theophrastus Coke l. 2 f. 7.30 who do seek reason in all things overthrow reason As if a man make a Lease of Indenture for life of lands in severall Counties and maketh livery of seisin in one County and divers daies after he maketh livery in the other County yet an intire rent shall issue out of the land in both Counties and yet the livery by which the Estate passed was made at severall times and therefore it may be argued that presently by the first livery the rent issued out of it But the Law shall not adjudge by parcels in subversion of the intent and agreement of the parties but after all Acts are made in performance of the originall contract and agreement of the parties the Law shall adjudge upon all as done at one and the same time So if a man make a Charter of Feoffment with warranty and deliver the Deed to the Feoffee and after at another time make livery secundum formam chartae yet the Warranty is good and yet it may be objected that when the Deed was delivered no estate passed to which the warranty may be annexed nor no estate was in the Feoffee by which the Deed might enure and so by nice construction upon the distinction of time the warranty shall be subverted but the Deed which comprehended the warranty took effect presently by the delivery of the Deed before livery and seisin and therefore the sentence is true that who do seek reason in all things subvert reason ibidem SECT II. A Verbis legis non est recedendum Coke l. 5. f. 118. b. we ought not to go from the words of the Law Edriches casc A. deviseth rent with distress to B. for the life of C. the heire leaseth the land for life to D. the remainder to E. in see the rent is behind in the life of D. D. dieth C. dieth B. distraineth for the arrearages of E. in remainder and resolved that he shall be charged by the second branch of 32 H. 8. c. 37. which giveth a distress for the arrearages upon such lands out of which the said rents were issuing in such manner and form as if Cestuy que vie had been living And the Judges said that they ought not to make any interpretation against the express letter of the statute for nothing can so express the intent of the makers of the act as their direct words themselves for Index animi seâ—mo and it shall be perilous to give scope to make construction in any case against the express words when the intent of the makers appeareth not to the contrary and when no inconvenience upon it shall arise for we ought not to go from the words of the Law vide ibidem plura Coke l. 10 f. 105. a. b. If in an Assise so many of the Recognitors make default that there be not twelve the Justices of Assise cannot award Tales de circumstantibus for though the Justices of Assise are named in the said Act of 35 H. 8. as well as the Justices of Nisi prius yet insomuch as the said Act doth not give power to Justices of Assise or Nisi prius but where the tryall shall be by twelve men in any Writ of Habeas Corpora or Distringas with Nisi prius and it cannot be in an Assise for Assisae capiamur in proprio Comitatu and can never be taken by Nisi prius in proprio commitatu and no exposition can be made against the express words for that shall be viperina expositio quae
Dower and distraineth the tenant albeit the grant of Mesne was to acquit him against the Lord and his heires onely yet because she continued the State of her husband and the reversion remained in the heire this grant of the acquittall did extend to his wife for Qui haeret Quoties in verbis nulla est ambiguitas ibi nulla expositio contra verba ipsa fienda est Coke l. 7. f. 24. a. So often as there is no ambiguity nor doubt in the words there no exposition against the expresse words is to be made If A. by Deed granteth rent out of the Mannor of D. to have and receive it to him and his heires and further granteth by the same Deed that if the rent be behind that the grant shall distraine in the Mannor of S. both the Mannors are charged the one with the rent the other with the distresse for the rent the one issueth out of the Land and the other is to be taken upon the Land for here a rent is granted expresly to be issuing out of the Mannor of D. and the parties have expresly limited out of which Land the rent shall issue and in which the distresse shall be taken and the Law shall not make any exposition against the expresse words and intention of the parties when it can stand with the rule of Law for where there is no ambiguity in the words there is no exposition to be made contrary to the expresse words ibidem in Calvins case Exception Yet as Mr. Ploydon saith f. 18. b. The words of the Law of nature of the Law of the Realme and the Law of God will yeild and give place to some acts and things done against the words of the same Laws and that is when they are infringed to avoid greater inconveniences or for necessity or by conpulsion For inconvenience It is a rule in the Law that factum unius alteri nocere non debet no mans deed ought to hurt another but there is another maxime that it is better to suffer a mischeife then an inconvenience which is to be preferred before it Coke com 152. b. As if there be Lord Mesne and Tenant and the Tenant holdeth of the Mesne by five shillings and the Mesne holdeth over by the service of twelve pence if the Lord purchaseth the Tenancy the Mesnalty is extinct because when the Lord hath the Tenancy he holdeth of the Lord next parament to him and if he should hold of him that was Mesne then he should hold the same Tenancy immediately of two Lords which should be inconvenient and the Law will that we rather suffer a mischeife then an inconvenience Littleton so as the rule is regularly true res inter alios acta alteri nocere non debet what thing is acted among some must not hurt an other but with this exception unlesse an inconvenience should follow Coke ibidem So it is a Maxime in the Law that a warranty of a collaterall Ancestor if it descend upon him shall bar the heire as if A. disseise B. of Land and selleth the Land and the Alienee obtaineth a warranty of the Ancestor collaterall to the Disseissee after whose death the warranty discendeth upon the Disseissee the Disseissee by descent of the warranty upon him is barred for ever in Law Doctor and Student l. 2. c. 501. but though they all offended in obtaining of the said collaterall warranty yet such an offence is not to be considered in the Law for the inconvenience that thereupon might ensue for it is holden for an inconvenience as Coke saith Com. 152 b. That any of the Maximes of the Law should be broken though a private man suffer losse for that by infringing of a Maxime not onely a generall prejudice to many but in the end a publick incertainty and confusion would follow lex citius tolerarâ— vult privatum damnum quam publicum malum and Law will sooner suffer a private injury then a publick evil neither in such cases is there any remedy to be had in the Chancery or in conscience for it was resolved in Beverlys case Coke l. 4. f. 124. a. That against an expresse maxime of the common Law no man shall have releife in Chancery for it should be in subversion of a principle or ground of Law Doctor and Student ibidem vide ibidem plura So Ployd 18. b. It is against the Law of nature and the Law of reason to beate the person of any man in any cases yet when a man is mad and of non sanae memoriae and doth much evill a man and his Parents also may take him binde him and beate him with rods and may justify it 22. Ass Pl. 56. And by the Statute of Mar. it is generally prohibited that none shall drive any distresse out of one County into another and yet it is adjudged that if one hold Land of a Mannor in another County that the Lord may distraine and drive the distresse of the Land holden of the Mannor in the County where the Mannor is and that is in avoidance of the inconvenience for it should be a great damage to the Lord if he should not drive the distresse to his owne mannor for the avoidance of which the Law is not offended although the words of the Law be broken M. 1. H. 6. Pl. f. 3. A man priviledged in some Court is sued in London and the Action is actionable no where else yet upon a supersedeas the Court shall surcease Finch Nomot And wee see also that necessity in all Lawes shall be a good excuse and that all Lawes give place to necessity according to the common proverbe necessitas non habet legem necessity hath no Law And therefore in a precipe quod reddat the tenant shall excuse his default by a flood of water and yet every default is abhorred in our Law because it is a contempt of the Court but because by perill of death he could not come the necessity of the chance in such case in regard there was no default in him shall excuse him M. 38. H. 6. 11. So the words of the Law of God may be infringed by necessity without offence to God and therefore in the old Law by the Law of God it was prohibited that none should eate of the shew bread and yet it appeareth that David for necessity of famine did eate the said bread and yet he did not breake the Law as our Saviour Christ declareth in the Gospell so the Apostles of our Saviour did pull the eares of Corne of other persons and did eate them and that for necessity of famine Ploydon f. 19 a. So if a man steale victualls to satisfie his present hunger this is no Felony nor Larceny Stanford because it is for the conservation of life And if diverse be in danger of drowning by the casting away of some Boats or Barge and one of them get to some Planke or on the Beats side to keep him above water and
of a Grant be good in parcels and for parcels not that which is for the advantage of the Grantee shall be taken to be good As if a man granteth unto me an annuity provided that it shall not charge his person the Proviso is void and the Grant good 20 E. 4 8. by Townsend 14 H. 4. 30. by Hank And if an annuity be granted pro consilio impendendo though the Grantee be well skilled in divers professions of art yet counsell shall be given in that faculty onely which was intended at the time of the Grant 4. 1. E. 3. 6. If the King grant to a man that he and his Heirs shall be quit of Tax for the lands which they have this is a good Grant though there be no Tax at the time of the Grant 38 H. 6. 10. And so is the Law of Tenths and fifteens ibidem Ployd f. 29. a. If a man maketh a Lease for life and after the decease of Tenant for life that the lands redibus to A. B. in fee it is held a good remainder because it is held for a principle that the Livery of every one shall be taken more strong against him 18 E. 3. f. 28. If a man give land to one haeredibus it shall be a Fee-simple without the word suis and though he doth not give him a Fee-simple expresly yet every mans livery shal be taken strongest against him Ployd f. 18 b.a. If I make a lease for years upon condition that one moneth after he shall have fee he shall have it after the moneth accordingly for the thing shall pass according to the convention more strong against the Donor Ployd ibidem So if I make a lease to two upon condition that if one doth dye within seven years that then after the death of the other it shall remain to a stranger in fee that remainder is good for the reason of the condition to give the estate to privies or strangers is all one in regard that he had first given an estate to which the condition may be annexed for the livery and limitation shall be taken strongest against him that made it ibidem If I give land to one filio suo primogenito and he hath no Son at the time of the gift and after he hath a Son that son shall have the land by way of remainder and yet the remainder was not out of the Lessor neither did it vest at the time of livery but the Law construeth the livery and limitation more strong against the Lessor P. 17 E. 3. f. 29. Ployd vide ibidem plura If two Tenants in Common grant a rent of ten shillings this is severall and the Grantees shall have twenty shillings But if they make a Lease and reserve ten shillings they shall have onely ten shillings between them So an Obligation to pay ten shillings at the feast of our Lord God it is no plea to say that he did pay it but he must shew at what time or else it will be taken that he paid it after the feast for every act shall be taken more strictly against him that made it Noy Max. f. 15. 2 E. 3. p. M f. 140 b. 161. b. A generall pardon ought to be taken more beneficially for the Subject against the King 37 H. 8. f. 21. Coke l. 4. Vaughans case If I. S. submit himselfe to arbitrement of all Actions and Suites between him and I D. and I. N. it shall be intended collective of joynt Actions and distributive of severall Actions also because the words shall be taken stronger against him that speaketh 2. R. 3. 18. 21. H. 7. 29. If I grant 10 l. rent to Baron and Feme and if the Baron dye the Feme shall have three pound rent it shall be strongest taken against me the grantor for three pounds addition to the ten 8. Ass Pl. 10. So if I sow all my Land with Corne and let it for yeares the Corne passeth to the Lessee if I except it not So if I have a free Warren in my owne Land and let my Land for life not mentioning the Warren yet the Lessee by implication shall have the Warren discharged and extracted during the Lease 8. A. 7 32. H. 6. If I. give Lands to I. S. and his heires males this is a good Fee-simple and the words males is void Bac. Max. f. 12. vide ibidem plura Yet this rule also faileth when another which the Law holdeth worthier cometh in place and which is of more equity and humanity It is a rule in the Civill Law valeant eo modo quo valere possunt and at the Common Law Benignae faciendae sunt interpretationes chartarum propter simplicitatem laicorum ut res magis valeat quam pereat Coke com f. 30 b. The interpretations of Deeds and charters because of the simplicity of the people are favorably to be made that the thing may rather stand and subsist then fall and perish and let all things stand by the same meanes they may stand And therefore if I give Lands to I. S. and his heires rendring five pounds yearly to I. D. and his heires this implyeth a condition to me that am the grantor Littleton yet were it a stronger exposition against me to say that the limitation shall be void and the Feoffment absolute So if a man make a lease to A. for yeares and after by his Deed the Lessor voluit quod haberet teneret terram pro termino vitae willeth that he should have and hold the Land for terme of his life this is adjudged by the word volo to be a good confirmation for life Coke com f. 301. b. Though it were stronger to say those words are void because they are not proper words of confirmation So if the Disseisor granteth a rent to the Disseisee and he by his Deed granteth it over and after doth re-enter in this case one and the same words doe amount to a grant and a confirmation So if the Disseisor maketh a Lease for life or in taile the remainder to the Disseisse in fee and the Disseissor by his Deed granteth over the remainder and the particular tenant atturneth the Disseissee shall not enter upon the tenant for life or in taile for then he should avoid his own grant which amounteth to a grant of the estates and a confirmation also ne pereat Coke ibidem 302. So if A enfeoffeth another upon condition that he and his heires shall render to a stranger and his heires a yearely rent of twenty shillings although this reservation be meerly void for that no estate moveth from the stranger and that he is not party to the Deed and therefore can be no rent yet shall it be taken for a penalty or for an annuall summ in grosse so as if they will not pay it according to the forme of the Indenture they shall loose the Land by the entry of the Feoffor and his heires which is to be observed that
the day of payment make his Executors and 〈…〉 dye and the heire enter into the Land as he ought c. the Feoffor ought to pay the monies to the Executor because the Executors as he saith l. 5. f. 99. a. represent the person of the Testator for all Goods and Chattels but if the condition upon the Mortgage be to pay the Mortgagee or his heires the mony c. and before the day of payment the Mortgagee dyeth the Feoffor cannot pay the mony to the Mortgagee but the payment ought to be made to the heire for expressum c. and the Law shall never seek out a person when the parties themselves have appointed one for designatio unius est exclusio alterius the appointment of one is the exclusion of the other But if the condition be to pay the mony to the Feoffee his Heires or Executors then the Feoffor hath election to pay it either to the Heire or Executor Coke com ibidem It is a sure ground in the Law expressum facit cessare tacitum Davis 45. in the case of Tenures and therefore the expresse reservation in Letters Patents excluded the reservations and implication in Law as if the King in his Letters Patents reserveth no tenure it shall be a capite tenure but if another tenure be expressed that shall prevaile as Coke l. 6. f. 6. where in a Patent the words of the Tenendum were Tenendum de nobis per servittum unius rosae pro omnibus servitij and wheras it was objected that no tenure can be without fealty yet in this case fealty that is an incident to all services shall be admitted to stand with the words and that then the tenure so expresly reserved was so compleate that it might well exclude the Knights service tenure which otherwise the Law would have implyed Davis Ibidem where it was also resolved that although the expresse tenure be void yet no tenure by implication of Law shall arise against the expresse tenure of reservation And so in the case of a void Habendum which standeth upon the same reason it was adjudged in B.R. between Higs and Crosse 33 and 34 Eliz. which in Bucklers case is cited by Coke l. 2. f. 55. Tenant for life maketh a Lease for years and after granteth the reversion to A. Habendum from a day to come for life after the day the Lessor for years atturneth in that case the Habendum is void and that void Habendum maketh void the whole Grant and excluded the implication of Law in the Premisses and no Estate shall pass by implication of Law in the Premisses against the express limitation of the partie in the Habendum Davis ibidem A man maketh a Lease rendring rent and doth not say to whom the rent shall be paid this by implication shall be to the Lessor and his Heirs But if the words be to the Lessor the Heir shall not have it Dyer 45. 12 Eliz. 3. c. So as an Estate by implication shall be controlled by an express limitation But if I grant to another a rent which I have in fee the grant shall be for life but if I say further Habendum after the death of I. S. there all shall be void Ployd 52.156 So if the King granteth lands by Letters Patens Habendum from a day to come there the whole grant is made void by the Habendum coke l. 5. f. 93. Barwicks case He in the reversion for life gtanteth his Estate Habendum after Michaelmas and after Michaelmas the Tenant attornes yet resolved the grant is void though if there had been no Habendum it had been good by the Premisses of the Deed coke f. 2. c. 55. Davis f. 26.27 Coke l. 7 f. 41. b If the Father by Deed indented in consideration of a hundred pounds paid by his son covenanteth to be seised to the use of his son there no use shall be raised to the son if the Deed be enrolled by the statute of 26 H 8. c. 10. for that it is in the nature of a bargain and sale and that which is expressed shall cause that which is implied to cease ibid. Coke l. 4. f. 8. a. in Nokes case It was resolved by the whole Court that an express Covenant doth qualifie the generality of the Covenant in Law and restraineth it by the mutuall assent of both parties which shall extend to no further then the express Covenant Quia clausula generalis non refertur ad expressa because a generall clause implyed in Law hath no reference to an express and particular Covenant in deed Yet Quadam tacita habentur pro expressis As if the Father Tenant by Knights-service enfeoff his son and heir within age it is not necessary to aver by collusion for it is apparant Ployd Winbichs case and 27 H. 8. Dacres case 33 H. 6. 14 c. So if I covenant to stand seised to the use of my Wife Son or Cosin that shall well raise a use without any express words of consideration for sufficient consideration appeareth because paternall love and affection appear If in a Lease the express Covenant is that the Lessee and his Executors shall repaire the house demised This shall not excuse the Assignee who by an implyed Covenant in Law adherent to the Estate is tied to repair it Coke l. A Warranty in Law is not distroyed by an express Warranty as if a man lease for life rendring rent and further bindeth himself and heirs to Warranty there the express Warranty shall not take the Warranty in Law but he may choose which he pleaseth Coke l. 4. f. 81. a. vide ibidem plura Lex neminem cogit ad impossibilia Coke com f. 231. b. l. 5. f. 75. a. The Law compelleth no man to impossibility If a Deed remain in one Court it may be pleaded in another Court without shewing forth for the Law doth not compell any one to impossibilities ibidem If a Lease be made upon condition that the Lessee dwell upon the lands demised the lease being for forty years and he dieth at the end of ten years yet the Executor shall enjoy the land because the condition is become impossible Et nemo tenetur ad impossibilia Dod. No man is bound to impossibilities 37 38 Eliz. If a man make a Lease for years of woods and it is covenanted that the Lessee shall leave the woods in as good plight as it was at the time of the Lease made and during the term the woods fell down by suddain tempest the Lessor shall not have an action of Covenant because it is impossible the Lessee shall perform it Perk. f. 142. b. Coke l. 1. f. 98. a. Coke com f. 206. a. If the condition of a Bond be impossible at the time of making the Condition the Condition is void because impossible and the Bond good As if a man be bound in an Obligation c. with Condition that if the Obligor doth go from the Church of S. Peter
at Westminster to the Church of S. Peter at Rome within three hours that then the Obligation shall be void the Condition is void impossible and the obligation standeth good And so it is of a Feoffment upon condition that the Feoffee shall go as is aforesaid the Feoffment is absolute and the Condition void because it is a Condition subsequent for there is a precedent Condition and a subsequent Condition If a Condition subsequent to a Feoffment in fee be impossible the state of the Feoffee is absolute but if the Condition precedent be impossible no state or interest groweth thereupon As if a man make a Lease for life upon Condition that if the Lessee go to Rome as aforesaid that then he shall have fee the Condition precedent is and therefore no Fee-simple followeth Coke ibid. The statute appointeth that in re-disseisin the Sheriff shall go to the place and there shall take the Inquest If then the re-disseisin is of severall lands in divers Counties so as he cannot be at all at once it is sufficient to take the Inquest at one of them because of the impossibility 40 Ass 23. If a man be bound by recognizance or Bond with Condition that he shall appear the next term in such a Court and before the day the Conuzee or the Conuzor dieth the Obligation is saved And in all cases where a condition of a Bond or Recognizance c. is possible at the time of making of the Condition and before the same can be performed the Condition becometh impossible by the act of God or of the Law or of the Obligee there the Obligation is saved But otherwise in case of a Feoffment as if a man maketh a Feoffment on condition that if the Feoffor shall appear in such a Court the next term that then it may be lawfull for the Feoffor to re-enter and presently after the Feoffor dieth the estate of the Feoffee is become absolute And the reason of this diversity is because the estate of the land is executed and setled in the Feoffees and cannot be returned back but by matter subsequent viz. The performance of the Condition But a Bond or Recognizance is a thing in action and executory and whereof no advantage can be taken untill there is a default in the Obligor Coke com f. 260. a. vide ibid. plura Vltima prioribus derogant Reg. I. C. Leges posteriores priores contrarias abrogant Coke l. 11 f. 62. 63. The last Laws derogate and abrogate the first which are contrary Though the wisdome of the Judges and sages of the Law have all wages suppressed subtle and new inventions in derogation of the Common Law and will not change the Law that hath been used 38 E. 3. 1 so as if it be not altered by Parliament it remaineth still yet as Cato said Vix ulla lex fieri potest que omnibus commoda sit And as Sir Edward Coke rerum progressui ostendunt multa quae initio praecaveri provideri non possint It is impossible for any Law to be which may be commodious to all and the progress and proceeding of things shew and present many things which at the first could neither be presaged nor prevented From whence it proceedeth that no Law can be so absolute but that may in some particulars prove defective and amendable and yet as Ployd f. 369. that Law is reasonable which provideth for the multitude though some especiall persons lose by it which hath been the occasionall cause of the alteration of the Common Law in many points Yet the Common Law hath no controller but the high Court of Parliament and the wisdome and custome of this State hath alwaies had such regard and respect to the Common law that they would by no meanes change it but by the great Councell of Parliament wherein all things are transacted not onely by the prudency of the Prince but by the cheifest and sagest Senators of the whole Nation and that not upon the consultation and declaration of one or two hundred but as Fortescue by more and three hundred elect men by which number the Senate of Rome was ruled who alwaies have been cautious and vigilant not to introduce any forrein Law as Sir John Davis in his Preface observeth That in the Parliament of Merton when motion was made by the Clergy that Children borne before marriage might be adjudged legitimate The great and wise men of England made answer with one voice Nolumus leges Angliae mutari And again in 11 R. 2. when a new course of proceeding in criminall Causes according to the form of the Civill Law was propounded in that unruly Parliament Answer was made by all the States That the Realm of England had not been in former times nor hereafter should be ruled by the Civill Law And therefore for the most part Magna Charta which is the foundation of other Acts of Parliament and other ancient Statutes are but the affirmations and declarations of the Common Law And that whereas the words of the Statute are generall the construction thereof shall be according to the reason of the Common Law Coke com 81 b. 282. b. So cautious have our grave and prudent Senators been not to subject the common-law to any mutations unless for necessary and impulsive causes reasonably arising from the publick mischeifs and inconveniencies which happen in the Common-weal through the injurious abuses of the ancient and former Lawes upon which grounds other Lawes were constituted for the remedy of such mischeifs and inconveniencies which did abrogate the former from whence grew this ground Leges postertores priores abrogant To illustrate this by examples It is regularly true that Statutes in the affirmative shall not take away precedent acts affirmative unless it be in speciall cases As the Statute of Wills 32. 34 H. 8. doth not take away a custome to devise lands as often hath been adjudged So it is enacted that the King shall have Wreckum Maris per totum regnum yet this shall not take the wreck from one who hath wreck by prescription unless the prescription had been per totam Angliam Coke l 5. in Sir Henry Constables case So the Statute of 21 H. 8. c. 13. enacteth that if one â—ath a Benefice of the value of eight pounds and taketh another and is inducted the first is void doth not take away the Law which was before that if one who had a Benefice with cure did accept another the first is void only that in that case no lapse shall incur without notice Coke l. 4. in Hollands case and in this point is the Statute nothing else but a confirmation and affirmance of the Law before ibid. So the Statute of 23 Eliz. that inflicteth the penalty of twenty pounds by the moneth hath not taken away the Statute of 1 Eliz. which hath given the forfeiture of twelve pence for every Sunday and Holy-day but both shall be paid the twelve pence onely to
consisteth in idlenesse for idlenesse is the mother of all vices and as Coke there saith principally in young men who ought in their youth to learne profitable sciences and trades which are profitable to the weale publick of which they may reape the fruites in their old age for jeunesse oisense vilesse disettense if in our youth we be idle in our old age we shall be indigent and for that reason the common Law detesteth all Monopolies which prohibit any one to work in any Lawfull trade and that appeareth in 2. H. 5. b. A Dyer was bound that he shall not use his Diers craft for two yeares and there Hull said that the obligation was against the common Law and that by God if the Plaintiff were here he should goe to prison untill he had made fine to the King and so for the same cause if an husbandman be bound that he shall not till and sow the ground the obligation is against the common Law And therefore the act of 5. Eliz. c. 4. that prohibited any person to use or exercise any craft mistery or occupation unlesse he had been an Apprentice for seven yeares doth not make provision onely to the intent that the artificers may be skilfull but that young men shall not be idle in their youth but trained and brought up in lawfull sciences and trades and so by the same reason the common Law doth not prohibit any person to use many Arts and Misteries at his pleasure for nemo prohibitur plures negotiationes sive Artes exercere untill it was prohibited by the Act of Parliament 37. E. 3. 6. That all Artificers c. are bound every one to one mistery and that none use other mistery but that he hath chosen but because that restraint of free trade was prejudiciall to the weale publick at the next Parliament it was enacted that all people should be so free as they were before that Ordinance by which it appeareth that without Act of Parliament no man can be in any manner restrained to worke in any lawfull trade Non negligentibus sed impotentibus succurrendum Reg. I. C. Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniant Ployd f. 357. b. The Law helpeth and releiveth those are impotent not those are negligent As if you disseise me of my Land and then A. bringeth a Writ of right against you and you joyn the mise upon the meer right and you make default after the mise joyned he shall recover to him and his Heires for ever quit of you and your Heires for ever and if I doe not lay my claime within a yeare a day I am barred for ever for the Law succoureth those that are watchfull and not sleepy so as non-claime by a yeare and a day upon a recovery by default where finall judgement is given was a good Bar by the common Law 5. E. 3.222 by Hor. A descent cast during the Coverture where the wife is disseised barreth her not of her entry after her husbands death but if a feme-sole be disseised and then taketh an husband there a descent during the coverture taketh away her entry for it was her folly to take such an husband that entred not in time Littleton 95. Negligentia semper habet comitem infortunium Coke l. 8. f. 133. a. Sa. Turnors case An Executor of an Administrator ought to execute his office and administereth the goods of the dead lawfully truly and diligently Lawfully in the payment of all dueties debts and legacies in such precedency and order as they ought to be paid by the Law truly to convert nothing to his own use and ought not by any practise or devise to bar or hinder any creditor of his debt but ought truly to execute his office according to the trust reposed in him And diligently as in the case at bar for when the Administrators which had judgement for one hundred pounds for sixty pounds and the Plaintiff offered a release or to acknowledge satisfaction and he deferreth it to the intent that the Judgement shall stand in force by which the Plaintiff shall be defrauded of his due debt and the Administrators to convert the goods of the debt to their private use let the agreement be precedent before the recovery or subsequent since the recovery it is all one as to the creditor who is a third person for he is defrauded as well by the one as the other and the creditor who is a stranger shall loose his debt which is by the Law due to him and if any prejudice accreweth to the Administrators in this case it is in his own default for the Plaintiff would have released to them or acknowledged satisfaction but they defer it to the intent to bar the Plaintiff of his just and true debt and negligence hath allwayes misfortune or ill luck for her companion Ibidem Coke l. 2. f. 26. b. If a creditor upon a commission upon a Statute of Bankrupt either by obstinacy doe refuse or by carelessnesse neglect to come before the Commissioners within the time limited and to crave the benefit of the Act he looseth the benefit thereof for the Law releiveth those which are vigilant and not dormant for otherwise a debt may be concealed or a creditor may absent himselfe and void the proceedings of the Commissioners and every creditor ought to take notice of the commission it being a matter of record Coke l. 4. f. 10. b. in Bevills case it was said that the Act of 32. H. 8. c. 2. by expresse words extendeth onely to actuall possession and seisin and not to releive those which for so long time had neglected to have actuall seisin of their services and namely of suite which ought to be made twice every yeare and it was said that it was crassa supina negligentia which that Law did not intend to releive for as it is commonly said vigilantibus c. Ibidem Coke l. 4. f. 82. b. in Sir Andrew Corbets case who deviseth Lands to R. C. and others to have and to hold to them and the survivor of them untill such time that the summ of eight hundred pounds c. was received out of the issues rents c. for the preferment of his Daughters it was resolved though the Devisee had notice of the devise yet if a stranger had occupied the Land the Devisee ought to take notice at his perill for vigilantibus c. and none by the Law in such case is bound to give him notice as in the case of arbitrement 1. H. 7.5.8 E. 4.1 ibidem And this is the reason of a lapse incurring for want of presentment or of a warranty barring for lack of entry or of descents barring for want of claime and a title to tenant in courtesy is lost for lack of entry and that Statutes of limitation do bar actions One seised of Lands devisable deviseth that his Executors shall sell his Land and distribute the profits for the use of the poore and dyeth If a