good against the Heir tho the Executors have Assets he may have his Election 1 Anderson p. 7. Sir Ed. Capels Case Debt lies against the Heir of an Heir upon Obligation of the Ancestor to the 10th degree Noy 56. Dennyes Case The Obligee shall have a joint Action against all the Sons in Gavel-kind 11 H. 7.12 b. Debt against three Heirs in Gavel-kind the Defendant pleads C. one of the Heirs is within Age. The Heir of an Heir shall be chargable with an Obligation simul cum the immediate Heir and such Heir shall have his Age Moor n. 194. Hawtree and Auger 1 Anderson p. 10. n. 22. id Case If a Man bind himself and his Heirs in an Obligation and leaves Land at Common Law and Gavel-kind the Creditors must sue all the Heirs and if there be Land on the part of the Father and on the part of the Mother and both have Land by descent he shall have several Actions and Execution shall cease till he may take it against both so that the Construction of Law is stricter where the Heir is charged with Warranty real than when he is charged with a Chattel Hob. p. 25. Riens per descent pleaded and what shall be Assets J. S. by Will deviseth his Land to his Heir at 24. and if he die without Heir of his Body before 24. the Remainder over he attains 24. a Fee-simple descends for no Tail shall arise before his said Age which Tail shall never take effect 2 Leon. p. 11. Hind and Sir John Lion id Case 3 Leon. p. 70. The Father bound in Obligation and deviseth his Lands to his Wife till his Son comes to 21 years of Age the remainder to his Son in Fee and dies the Son shall be adjudged in by descent 2 Leon. 123. fol. 101. Bashpooles Case 3 Leon. p. 118. The Ancestor was seised in Fee and by his Will deviseth them to the Defendant being his Son and Heir and to his Heirs on Condition to pay his Debts within a year and if he failed his Executors shall sell he entred and paid no Debts the Executors after entred and sold It s not Assets in Heirs hands for though the Heir hath a Fee yet he hath it as a Purchaser being clogg'd with such a Condition Cro. M. 5 Car. p. 161. Gilpins Case Two things requisite to bind an Heir 1. Lien express 2. Lands by descent In Debt against an Heir he is charged as Heir and the Writ is in the debet and detinet and it s not in auter droit but taken as his proper Debt from 18 Ed. 2. till 7 H. 4. If the Executor had Assets the Heir was not chargeable but now the Law is changed in that Point if the Heir sell the Land before the Writ purchased he is discharged of the Debt in regard he is not to wait the Action of the Obligee Trusts descending shall be Assets by the Statute of Frauds and Perjuries so Lands of special Occupancy vid. Stat. The Defendant pleads his Father was seized in Fee and covenanted with J.S. c. to stand seized to the use of himself for Life the Remainder to the Defendant in Tail c. the Father had caused a Deed to be engrossed and delivered the Deed to a Scrivener to the use of J. D. and M. so as J. D. would agree to it J.D. died never having notice of the Deed Per Cur. the Father never covenanted because the Agreement of J. D. was a Condition precedent to the essence of the Deed and so no Deed to raise the Uses contra the Defendant Moor n. 426. Degoâ— and Rowes Case id Case 1 Leon. 152. n. 211. The Heir pleads riens per descent special Verdict find the Father was scised in Fee and enfeoft J. S. of the Mannor of P. excepted and reserved to the Feoffor for life two Acres only the Lands in question and after limited all to the Feoffees to the use of the Defendant in Tail Per Cur. the Lands do descend to the Son the Exception being void 2 Keb. p. 667 â—19 Wilson and Armorer Upon riens per descent pleaded special Verdict find M. seised in Fee de Saliva Anglice a Salt-pan died and his Son entred and was seised and the Defendant entred as Heir per possession fratris this is Assets by descent and such Heir per possession ' is chargable to the Debt of the Ancestor 3 Keb. Tr. 28 Car. 2. f. 659. Clinch and Butler The Heir pleads riens per descent the Defendant had levied a Fine but because no Deed of Uses was produced at Trial the Use was to the Conusor and his Heirs and so the Heir in by descent Mod. Rep. p. 2. Riens per descent pleaded Feoffment pleaded at the Trial it appeared to be fraudulent it need not be pleaded but may well be given in Evidence 5 Rep. 60. Gooches Case Debt vers l'Heir he may plead in Bar a Release made by the Obligee to the Executors and though the Deed belongs to another yet he must shew it forth for both of them are privy to the Testator Co. Lit. 232. a. Upon riens per descent pleaded it was found he had Assets in the Cinque-ports Judgment was general against the Defendants and as to the Moleties of the Lands in the Cinque-Ports the Plaintiff 〈◊〉 have a Certiorari to remove the Records into Chancery and thence by Mittimus to send to the Constable to make Execution 1 Anderson n. 65. p. 28. Hicker and Harrison vers Tirrel 3 Leon. p. 3. The Heir pleads riens per descent the Plaintiff replies he sued a former Writ vers l'heir and the Defendant was outlawed which was reversed and he freshly brought this Writ by journeys accompts and avers he had Assets the day of the first Writ purchased Hob. p. 248. Spray and Sherrat Cro. Jac. 589. id Case cited Debt vers l'heir the Defendant pleads his Ancestor died Intestate and that one J. S. had administred and had given the Plaintiff a Bond in full satisfaction of the former upon Issue joined it was found pro Def. If the Obligor had given this Bond it had not discharged the former but being given by the Administrator so that the Plaintiffs security is bettered and the Administrator chargable de bonis propriis it s a good discharge Mod. Rep. 225. Blith and Hill He pleads riens per descent but 20 Acres in D. in Com. Warwic The Plaintiff replies more by descent in S. viz. so many Acres and found pro Def. and a discontinuance in the Record of the Plea from Term P. to Term M. assigned for Error and per Cur. its Error and not deins Stat. 18 Eliz. because the Judgment was not founded on the Verdict but upon the Confession of the Defendant of Assets Yelv. p. 169. Hill 7 Jac. B. R. Molineux Case The Heir pleads the Obligor died Intestate and J. S. administred and he had given the Plaintiff another Bond in full satisfaction of the former vide Mod. Rep.
was If Tenant in Tail of the Mannor of D. be bound in a Recognizance to J. S. which Recognizance after comes to the King by the Attaindâ— of J. S. of High-Treason and after Tenant in Tail dies and the Issue in Tail alien the Lands bona fide whether the King may extend the Lands in the Hands of the Alience It was resolved That if Tenant in Tail become indebted to the King by Judgment Recognizance Obligation or other Specialty and dies before any Process or Extent and the Issue in Tail alien the Land bona fide this Land shall not be extended by force of this Statute And also that in this Case in as much as the Debt was originally due to a Subject it is not within the Act to charge the Lands in the possession or seisin of the Heir in Tail or of his Alience for this Act extends only to Debts immediately due to the King originally and not to those which accrew to him by way of Assignment Outlawry Attainder Forfeiture Gift of the Party or any other collateral way 7 Rep. 21. Lord Andersons Case The Statute of 7 Jac. makes Assignments of Debts void other than such as grow originally to the Kings Debtor bona fide it restrains Assignments of Debts which are not due to the Debtors themselves but assigned to or by them to other Persons The purport of this Law was That no Debtor of the Kings should procure another Mans Debt to be assigned which was a common practice but a Man may assign his own Debt tho not to his own Use for what he may himself release and discharge by the same Reason he may assign as B. was bound to C. in a Stat. of 2000 l. C. dies Intestate his Wife administers and marries F. F. with others became bound to the King in 6000 l. F. and his Wife by Deed enrolled in Cur. Ward assign the Statute to the King by payment of the 6000 l. the Assignment was good Hob. p. 253. Brediman and Coles Cro. Hill 16 Jac. p. 524. id Case A Duty which is not naturally a Debt but by circumstance only as Debt upon Bond for performance of Covenants or to save harmless may be assigned over to the King for Debt yet a present Extent shall not issue but a Scire Fac. 2 Leon. p. 55. Beaumounts Case Debt against one as Executor and upon fully administred pleaded it was found pro Quer. who assigned the same to the King 2 Leon. p. 67. Noons Case M. indebted to S. by a Note in writing per me but not sealed such a Debt may be assigned to the Queen 3 Leon. 234. March An Obligation may be assigned to the King sans Deed enrolled 3 Leon. p. 234. South and Marsh 21 H. 7.19 Where the King sues for a Debt assigned to him the Obligor cannot plead nil debet for by the Assignment it s become matter of Record ibid. An Obligation forfeited to the King by the Statute 28 Eliz. c. 8.1 Q. if the King may grant before Seisure 2. There are two Obligees and one forfeits Q. if the King shall have all the Bond 1 Rolls Rep. p. 7 12. Jac. B. R. Cullan and Bets. In Assignment of a Bond to the King the â—ead shall only be liable from the time of the Assignment but in Assignment of a Recognizance or Statute the King shall have the Land at the time of the Judgment rendred Lit. Rep. p. 125. Roy versus Hanton By the grant of bona catalla an Obligation passeth i. e. Paper and Wax yet the Grantee may not have Action upon this for that is not transferable Lit. Rep. 87. Dyer 25 H. 8.5 If a Debt be assigned to the King in this Case no priority of Execution 1 Brownl 37. A Condition to save harmless for assigning a Bond vide the Form Bridgmans Presidens Clark was indebted to A. by Bond and after delivers to Andrews certain Hogsheads of Wine to satisfie the said Debt and afterward Clarks Obligation is assigned to the Queen for A's Debt Per Cur. the property of the Goods by the delivery of them to Andrews before the Assignment was altered 2 Leon. 89. Bridget Clarks Case A. was indebted to B. who was indebted to the Queen B. assigned his Debt to the Queen by all the Barons Process shall be awarded out of the Exchequer to enquire what Goods A. had at the time of the Assignment and not what he had tempore scripti praedict fact 3 Leon. 196. Obligation Of Creditors in respect of Statute of Bankrupts and Assignments OSborn and Bradshaw were Sureties pro Churchman and had Counterbonds to save harmless the Sureties paid the Mony and afterwards Churchman became a Bankrupt Resolved that they were Creditors within the Statute 13 Eliz. Cro. Jac. 127. Osburn versus Churchman If an Obligation be taken in the Name of another to the use of a Bankrupt the Commissioners may well assign that unless the other party hath of his own Mony satisfied Debts due by the Bankrupt Noy p. 142. Caâ—â—hman's Case Debt sur Obligation assigned by Commissioners of Bankrupts and doth not shew the Obligation he need not because he comes in by act of Law and hath no means to obtain the Obligation As Tenant per Statute Merchant or Dower shall have advantage of a Rent Charge sans shewing the Deed. Cro. Jac. p. â—9 Gray and Fâ—â—lder R. is indebted to S. and B. joyntly S. becomes a Bankrupt and the Commissioners assign the Obligation to B. Q. 1 Keb. p. 167. Roylston and Ratcliff If I am bound to J. S. and he before Bankrupcy assigns the Bond this is liable to the after Bankrupcy of J. S. being only suable in his Name 2 Keb. 331. Backwell versus Litcott In Debt sur Bond the Defendant pleads before Action brought the Plaintiff became a Banrupt Per Cur. it 's an ill Plea and until an Assignment made the Debtor is defenceless and payment before Commission sued out is good enough and so it is before his Debt be assigned 3 Keb. 316. Andrews and Spicer In Debt sur Obligat the Defendant pleads that it was in trust for Holt who was a Bankrupt virtute Commission ' c. this Debt was assigned to Ashly and Penning aliis Creditoribus The Plaintiff replies It was not assigned The Defendant demurs specially for doubleness The Court conceived the Bankrupcy traversable as well as the Assignment yet the Issue is well enough 3 Keb. 737. Jones and Bolton Condition to give account to the Creditors c. 1 Keb. 815 843. Selby versus Walker The Disposition by Commissioners of Bankrupts saves the forfeiture of the Obligation 2 Keb. 202. in Robin's Case I shall here subjoyn some things respecting Matters of Tort as Forgery Detinue c. of Obligations Forgery IF a Man forge a Bond in my Name I can have no Action of the Case yet but if I am sued I may tho' I may avoid it by Plea But if it were a Recognizance or Fine I shall
do not restrain the Condition to the last part only to wit of the two Obligations but do extend to the Recognizance per the first words The Condition of this Obligation is such and per the word also in the last Clause 1 Rolls Abr. 409. Ingoldsby and Steward For the Matter and Substance of the Condition What Conditions are good and what not A Condition to do any lawful or possible thing is good as to make a Release perform Covenants not to play at Cards and Dice not to be Surety c. But when the matter or thing to be done by the Condition is unlawful or impossible or the Condition it self is repugnant insensible or uncertain the Condition is void and in some Cases the Obligation also Conditions against Law are void Against the Law of God of Nature to do a thing that is malum in â—se as to kill a Man or do any other Felony c. in such Cases the Condition and Obligation are both void Co. Lit. 206. Conditions against Common Law Statute Law Note This difference between a Bond made void by Common Law and a Bond made void by Statute Law If a Bond be made void by Statute Law it s void in the whole as upon the Statute 23 H. 6. If a Sheriff take a Bond for a thing against that Law and also for a due Debt the whole Bond is void for the Letter of the Statute is so 2 Rolls Rep. 116. But the Common Law doth divide and having made void that that is against Law le ts the rest stand Carters Rep. fol. 230. in Pearson and Humes Case A Bond to perform Covenants one is void and the other good the Bond is good for those that are agreeable to Law as in Sir Daniel Nortons Case Hob. p. 14. Cro. Eliz. p. 529. 2 Anderson 116. Lee and Coleshill 3 Rep. 82 83. Lee and Coleshill cited in Twines Case If the Condition be to do a thing contrary to Law the Obligation is void 2 H. 4.9 Co. Lit. 206. b. But here is another Diversity A Condition to a do a thing against the Law of God of Nature a malum in se or against Law and Justice in such Cases the Obligation and Condition are both void as for unlawful Maintenance for a Sheriff not to execute Process and the like But when the thing to be done or not to be done by the Condition is not malum in se but against some Ground of the Law as that a Man shall make a Feoffment to his Wife or is but malum prohibitum only as that a Man shall erect a College contrary to the Statute of 31 Eliz. or a Man is bound to alien certain Lands to a Religious House or repugnant to the Estate as Feoffee of Land shall not alien or take the Profits or that Tenant in Tail shall not suffer a Recovery c. In these Cases the Conditions are only void and the Obligations remain single and yet Equity will relieve against them yet if a Feoffment be made of Land on Condition to kill J. S. the Condition is void but the Feoffment is good for the state of the Land is setled and executed in the Feoffee and cannot be taken back but by the performance of the Condition which is void If a Man make a Feoffment in Fee on Condition that he shall not alien this Condition is repugnant and against Law and the state of the Feoffee absolute but if the Feoffee be bound in a Bond that the Feoffee or his Heirs shall not alien or take the profits this is good for he may notwithstanding alien or take the profits if he will forfeit his Bond Co. Lit. fol. 206. a. b. A Man is bound to do a thing unlawful at present which in time may be made lawful as a Feoffment of a Strangers Lands or of the Lands of an Alien c. in these Cases he is bound to do it and at his peril he must obtain Power to do them Lit. Rep. 86. Condition was That if the Defendant shall procure one J. S. to make reasonable Recompence to the Plaintiff for certain Beasts which he wrongfully took from the Plaintiff that then c. the Defendant saith de facto J. S. had stollen the Beasts and was indicted and so the Condition being against Law the Obligation was void Per Cur. where the Condition shall be said against Law and therefore the Obligation void the same ought to be intended where the Condition is expresly against the Law in express words and not for Matter out of the Condition as it is here Judgment pro quer 1 Leon. Case 99. Brook and King Conditions against Common Law Besides what hath been said before in general take some few Cases of Conditions against Common Law Maintenance A Condition to maintain any Suit unlawfully though no Act be done for if it be unlawful to be done the Bond is void The Condition is If J. S. the principal and J. H. and J. M. do pay c. all such Sums which are due and shall be due in such Suits The Under-Sheriff makes a Bond to the High-Sheriff that he shall not return Venire Fac. not intermeddle with Executions until he be acquainted it is naught and against Law 1 Brownl Rep. 64 65. Hobart p. 14. Norton and Sims That the Under-Sheriff shall not execute any Process of Execution without special Warrant and Assent of the Sheriff the Bond is void 2 Brownl Rep. p. 280 Chamberlain and Goldsmith 1 Rolls Abridg. p. 417. Norton and Sims A Bond to save J.S. harmless from such aâ— Appeal of Robbery as B. had against him is void 18 E. 4.28 A Condition to renounce an Administration is good 25 E. 4.30 A Condition that he should not molest or hurt the Obligee in his Lands or Goods ratione alicuâ— rei cujuscunque it shall be intended he shall not hurt tortiously but not to restrain him from prosecuting the Obligee for Felony or other just cause and so not against Law Crook Eliz. fo 705. Dolson and Crew Conditions against Statute-Law Against the Stat. 32 H. 8. Of Leuses made is Aliens DEbt upon Bond to perform Covenants in an Indenture which was to pay Rent The Defendant pleads Stat. 32 H. 8. which maltes Leases to Alien Artificers void and saith that the Defendant was an Alien born at Paris and avâ—s the three points of the Statute 1. That the House was a Mansion House at the time 2. That â—e viz. the Defendant was an Alien 3. That â—e was an Artificer The Plaintiff replies the Defendant was an Alien Artificer demurr Per Cur. the Replication not double but because he â—ad not said the place where he was born in Enâ—land it was ill Siderfin p. 357. Freeman and King The Form of the Plea Vid. 1 Saunders 5. Jevens â—nd Harwich Vid. Keble Against Stat. 5 6 E. 6. c. 16. Of buying of Offices THE Office of Armourer is within that Statute Stiles Rep. f. 29. Hill and Farmer The
performance of Covenants the Breach ought to be more precise and particular than Actions of Covenants because of the Penalty yet if what is material and the substance of the Covenant be alledged it may suffice as a Covenant was that the Defendant a Bayliff should not let at large any Prisoner that should be arrested without Licence of the Plaintiff an Under-Gaoler The Breach was that the Defendant had let at large at Westminster sans licence c. such an one who was arrested but shews not the place or time of the Arrest Per Cur. he need not the Escape being the material part of the Covenant Siderfin H. 12 Car. 2. f. 30. Jenkins and Hancocks Debt by a Brewer on a Bond to perform Articles against his Clark one was that the Defendant should deliver such Ale and Beer weekly as should be delivered unto him to such Customers as he had in his Charge and to receive the Monies due for the same and should accompt with the Plaintiff every Saturday weekly for such Monies he should receive for Breach the Plaintiff assigns that the Defendant did not account with him for such Monies as he had received on Saturday the 25th c. Verdict pro Quer. Judgment was arrested for the Breach was uncertainly alledged because the Plaintiff doth not shew the Defendant had any Customers in his charge or who they were or that he had delivered Ale or Beer to them or received any Mony of them Stiles p. 473. Arnold and Floid A Covenant that he and his Executors and Assigns would repair a Mill and alledgeth that the Mill was defective in Reparations and the Defendant his Executors and Assigns did not repair it Def. demurs because he did not alledge that he not his Executors or Assigns did not repair it for if any of them did repair it the Action lies not and per Cur. it is naught But upon motion of the Court the Defendant waved his Demurrer and the Plaintiff amended Crook Eliz. p. 348. Cole and How If the breach of the Condition of an Obligation be ill assigned the Verdict shall not aid this Default Sanders 2 part 179. Hele and Wotton Kerby and Hansaker there cited Though the Action be well brought upon the Obligation yet when it appears the Condition was for performance of Covenants there can be no cause of Action without some Covenant broken and so shall not have Judgment though he hath a Verdict Hob. 14. in Sir Daniel Norton's Case Disability wherein the Obligor hath disabled himself to perform the Condition IF a day be limited to perform a Condition if the Obligor once disable himself to perform this although he be enabled afterwards before the day yet the Condition is broken as if the Condition be to enfeoff me before Michâ—mas if before the Feast he enfeoff another yet the Condition is broken 21 E. 4.55 The Condition is if he permit and suffer all his Lands c. to descend remain or revert to such an one his Son immediately after his decease without any Act c. The Obligor â—ells parcel of the same Lands though he purchase them again yet the Obligation is forfeited Benlow n. 34. p. 9. Sir A. Main by an Indenture demiseth Lands to Scot for 21 years and covenants at any time during the Life of Scot upon Surrender of his Lease to make a new Lease c. and an Obligation to reform the Covenants Sir A. Main pleads in Debt upon this Obligation that Scot did not surrender Scot replies that after the said Demise Sir A. M. had accepted a Fine sur omisance de droit come ceo and by the same Fine grant and renders the Land to the Conisee par 80 ans Defendant demurs Per Cur. 1. Sir A. M. by the Fine levied had disabled himself either to take a Surrender or to make a new Lease and so hath broken his Covenant 2. Though the first Act was to be done by Scot viz. the Surrender and Scot may surrender if the term for 80 years be the Interest of a future term yet Scot shall have his Action without making any Surrender for after Surrender Sir A. M. cannot make a new Lease which is the Effect of the Surrender he hath disabled himself 5 Rep. 20. b. Sir Anthony Mains Case Poph. 109. Benl n. 121 125. So if he disable himself to perform it in the same plight as Feoffee on Condition to re-enfeoff grants a Rent-Charge marries a Wife c. this is a forfeiture of the Condition 44 E. 3.9 b. Coke on Litt. But if the Feoffee on a Condition to re-eneoff a Stranger and after another recovers the Land against him by default yet until Execution sued the Condition is not broken 44 E. 3.9 b. One promiseth to perform an Award which is that he shall after deliver an Obligation to another in which he is bound to him without limiting any time when this shall be performed If he bring Debt on the Bond and recover and after deliver the Obligation yet this is not any performance of the Condition for he ought to deliver this as it was at the time of the Award made Tr. 15 Jac. B. R. 1 Rolls Abridg. 447. Nichlâ— and Thomas If no time is limited if the Obligor be once disabled he is perpetually disabled 21 E. 4.54 b. Vid. Cases del Disability 1 Rolls Abr. 447 448. Conditions to perform particular Covenants To make Assurance TO make such Assurance as Counsel shall advise A Condition to make to the Obligee or his Assigns so good a Lease as Counsel shall advise and the Obligee appoints him to make a Lease to J. S. he must do it for it is not as shall be advised by Counsel Per Coke if the words were he shall make as good a Lease as Counsel shall devise he ought to have brought a Lease drawn by the advise of Counsel 1 Rolls Abr. 424. 1 Rols Rep. 373. Allen and Wedgwood To make such Assurance c. as the Plaintiffs Counsel shall devise it is not sufficient to plead he made such Assurance but that the Plaintiffs Counsel devised such Assurance which he had made Crook Eliz. 393. in Hutchinson's Case One covenants to make such Assurance c. as the Plaintiffs Counsel shall advise and he pleads performance of Covenants he cannot afterwards say Consilium non dedit advisantentum in Specot and Sheer's Case Crook Eliz. 828. The Defendant covenants to assure such Lands by such Assurance as by the Counsel of the Plaintiff shall be devised the Breach assigned in this the Plaintiff caused such an Assurance to be drawn and ingrossed and put Wax to it and required the Defendant to execute it and he refused The Defendant demurs per Cur. it is no Breach because the Plaintiff himself devised it Crook Eliz. p. 297. More versus Roswel On Covenant that before such a day he would make sufficient Estate of Lands to such value to the Plaintiff for term of his Life as by the Plaintiffs Counsel
1 Rolls Abr. p. 425. Q. 1. A Condition to perform Covenants in a Lease one was That he should enjoy such Lands let to him quietly without interruption and the Plaintiff in his Replication sheweth in facto that the Defendant the 20th of March 30 Eliz. had disturbed him and in that assigned the Breach the Defendant by Rejoynder sheweth that in the Indenture there was a Proviso that if he paid 10 l. the 31 of March 30 Eliz. that the Indenture and all therein contained should be void and alledged he paid 10 l. at the day but this was after the disturbance supposed and the Plaintiff demurs Judgment pro Quer. for by the Covenant broken before the Condition performed the Obligation was forfeited and it s not material that the Covenants became void before the Action brought but by Wray if the Proviso had been that upon the payment of the 10 l. as well the Obligation as the Indenture should be void â—lâ— for then the Bond was void before the Action brought so where a Parson made a Lease for years in which were divers Covenants and after he became non resident by which the Indenture became void yet he may maintain an Action of Covenant for a Covenant broken before his non Residency Cro. Eliz. p. 244. Hill and Pilkington Dyer 57. Bylones Case The Condition was If the Obligee his Heirs and Assigns shall and may lawfully hold and enjoy a Mesuage c. without the let c. of the Obligor or his Heirs or of every other Person discharged or upon reasonable request saved harmless by the said Obligor from all former Gifts c. the Defendant pleads no request was made to save him harmless Judgment pro Quer. because the Defendant hath not answered to all the the Conditions viz. to enjoying of the Land and there were two Conditions viz. the enjoying and saving harmless Moor n. 756. Creswell and Holmes Debt to perform Covenants in a Lease one was for quiet enjoyment against all claiming Title the Plaintiff assigns for Breach that a Stranger entred but saith not habens titulum Hales habens titulum at that time would have done Dyers Case is another entred claiming an Interest but that is not enough for he may claim under the Lessee himself If the Covenant had been to save him harmless against all lawful and unlawful Titles yet it must appear that he that entred did not claim under the Lessee himself Mod. Rep. 101. 3 Keble 246. Norman and Foster Hob. 34. Tisdale and Essex Moor 861. The Condition was if neither J. S. nor J. B. nor J. G. did not disturb the Plaintiff in his possession of such Lands by indirect means but by due course of Law The Defendant pleads that neither J. S. nor J. B. nor J. G. did disturb the Plaintiff by any indirect means but by due course of Law Q. if Plea good 2 Leon. 197. Dighton and Clark K. was seized and leased for years to J. H. Husband of Isabel and J. H. being so possessed by his Will devised that the said Isabel should have the use and occupation of the said Lands for all the years of the said Term as she should live and remain sole and if she died or married that then his Son should have the residue of the said Term not expired J. H. died Isabel entred to whom the said Kidwilly conveyed by Feoffment the said Lands in Fee and covenanted that the said Lands from thence should be clearly exonerated de omnibus prioribus barganiis titulis juribus omnibus aliis oneribus quibuscunque Isabel married and the Son entred Per Cur. this possibility which was in the Son at the time of the Feoffment though it was not actual yet the Land was not discharged of all former Rights Titles and Charges by the Marriage of the said Isabel it s become an actual Charge and the Term is not extinct by the acceptance of the Feoffment 1 Leon. p. 92. n. 120. Hamington and Rydear I am bound in a Statute and afterwards sell my Land with Covenant prout supra here the Land is not charged but if the Condition in the Defeasance be broken so as the Conusee extends now the Covenant is broken 1 Leon. p. 93. ibid. On Covenant to enjoy absque legali molestatione of the Defendant the Defendant pleads performance the Plaintiff replies by entry of the Defendant Lessor which is intended tortious and and so no breach for which cause the Defendant demurs Per Moreton Entry and lawful Entry are all one as to the Lessor and Rainsford conceived a general Entry no Breach the general Covenant being restrained by special Covenant against any lawful let 2 Keb. 717. Lee and Dalfton Debt on Bond to perform Covenants one of which was That the Plaintiff should not be interrupted in his possession of certain Lands by any Person that had lawful Title and particularly that he should not be interrupted by one Thomas Antony by vertue of any such Title the Defendant pleads performance the Plaintiff replies 1 No. 20 Car. The Defendant made the Lease to the Plaintiff and 3 No. he entred and that 17 Aug. 20 Car. before the Defendant made a Lease to Antony for years yet to come who 20 Aug. 20 Car. entred the Defendant pleads the Lease to Antony was on Condition of re-entry for non-payment of Rent and that before the Lease made to the Plaintiff the Rent was behind legitâ— demandat secundum formam Indenturae and he re-entred and made the Lease to the Plaintiff upon general Demurrer per Cur. the Demand was not sufficiently alledged for he ought to set forth when and where it was made that the Court might know if it were legal but for a â—w in the Plaintiffs Replication because he alledged his Entry after the Lease made to Antony so that it appears not he was interrupted by him the Opinion of the Court was against the Plaintiff Allen p 19. Colman and Painter Debt on Bond conditioned that if the Obligee his Executors and Assigns from the time of the Obligation may enjoy such Land c. The Defendant pleads that post obligationem until the day of the Bill the Plaintiff had enjoyed that Land Plaintiff demurs 1. Because the Defendant doth not say a die confectionis scripti obligatorii semper post non allocatur a Bar is good to common intent and it shall be taken he always enjoyed it unless the contrary be shewn which must come on the Plaintiffs part 2. Because he does not plead the Plaintiff and his Assigns enjoyed it non allocatur for it shall not be intended the Plaintiff made an Assignment unless he himself had shewn it Judgment pro Def. but it was moved to have the Plaintiff discontinue his Suit for otherwise he should be barred of his Debt whereas he had good cause of Action and the Court adjourned it till next Term that in the interim he might discontinue Cro. Car. 195. Harlow and Wright The Plaintiff
the Court of Requests with a Condition to appear before the Master c. the declaration is general that the Defendant such a year and day by his Obligation did acknowledge himself to be bound to the King in 60 l. to be paid c. and naught because it did not appear to be taken in a Court of Record 1 Brownl p. 68. Rex versus Castle Not to alien A Condition to perform Covenants one was That the Lessee his Executors or Assigns nor any other who shall come to have the Estate or Interest in the Term shall not alien their Estate sans licence of the Lessor but only to his Wife or Children the Lessee deviseth it to his Wife she alieus the Covenant is broken it extends to the Lessee and his Assigns and she is Assignee express so although there was once an Alienation by Licence yet that Assignee cannot alien sans Licence Where a Condition is in a Lease that neither he nor his Assigns should alien without Licence the Lessee died Intestate the Administrator was bound by this Condition Cro. El. 757. Thornil and Adams versus King sa Feme A Condition not to alien without the consent of the Lessor the Lessee makes his Executor and deviseth this to him the Executor enters generally the Testator not being indebted to any this is a Forfeiture 1. Rolls Abr. 429. Dampâ— and Symons Not to continue a Suit A Condition that he shall not continue such a Suit If he continue it by an Attorny it s a Breach alit if the Attorny enters the Continuance without his privity Cro. Jac. 525. Gray and Gray To convey Land upon Marriage THE Condition was That after Marriage of the Plaintiff and having a Son by his Wife that if he conveyed Lands to the 〈◊〉 of â— l. per aâ—n in Tail to the Son to enjoy after the death of the Obligor that then c. the defendant shews the day of the Maâ— and the having of a Son and that he made 〈…〉 to a Stranger to the use of himself 〈…〉 after to the use of the Son in Tail the Plaintiff replies quod non feoffavit the Bar is ill for the Infant was not made party to the Conveyance nor had any Deed to prove his Estate but the Plaintiff by the Replication hath admitted the â—ar to be good and he may traverse the Feoffment or the Uses Cro. Eliz. p. 825. Statfield and Somerset A Condition if the Obligor pay 200 l. by the first of December 1634. that then the Surrenderce should reconvey on request the Plaintiff alledgeth a Request in 1644. the Defendant demurs Per Cur. the Surrender being absolute and in trust only for payment there being no payment at the day this Mortgage is irremediable Judgment pro Defendente 3 Keb. 786. Hancocks Case To perform a Promise A Condition to perform such a Promise made by the Obligor to the Obligee but it not appearing when the breach of Promise was made it was Error Stiles 17. Sanderson and Martin Condition to do things belonging to a Trade A Condition to make all such Linnen as he should want during his living single the Sempstress is not bound to find Linen nor a Tailor Materials the Intent may guide the Contracts contra of a Shoe-maker Gold-smith c. 1 Keble 466. Oates versus Thornel Condition to deliver Goods or pay Value A Condition to deliver all the Tackle of a Ship mentioned in an Inventory under the Hands of four Men or in default thereof to pay so much Mony to the Plaintiff before such a Feast as the four Men should value the Tackle at the Defendant said they did not value the Tackle no Plea for he had election to do two things and if he cannot do the one he is to do the other and it is at his peril to procure the Men to value the Tackle Moor n. 844. More and Morecomb A Condition at the end of the Term of a Lease of Lands and Goods to deliver the said Goods to T. or make him such satisfaction for them as shall be by two indifferent Persons to be elected for review of them thought fit the Defendant pleads two Persons were not elected the Plaintiff replies two were elected the Defendant rejoins that they were not chosen by consent of both for the Defendant conseâ— noâ— to the election Per Cur. the election by the Plaintiff is sufficient for the word indifferent shall be referred to the Parties elected and not to the election of the Parties aliter if it had been by two Persons indifferently to be chosen 2 Rolls Rep. 86. Talbot and Benson 5 Rep. Hungates Case Condition to reap and carry Corn c. over the usual Way A Condition to permit and suffer J. S. quietly to reap and carry c. without any disturbance or interruption of him the Defendant pleads permisit the Plaintiff replies there were some Acres sowen with Rye and shews the certainty and coming to reap he prohibited him saying these words Moneo prohibeo te quod neque metes ibid. neque abcarriabis c. this disturbance is a Breach 1 Anderson n. 188. fol. 137. Bur and Higs Condition to give an Account A Condition for a sub-Collector of the Subsidy to give a sufficient account in the Exchequer of all such Sums he had received and to discharge and save harmless the Plaintiff of these Receipts against the Queen and to procure to the Plaintiff a sufficient Acquittance or Discharge out of the Exchequer as in the like Case is used that then c. the Defendant pleads he had accounted c. and had discharged and saved harmless the Plaintiff c. and had procured Acquittance the Plaintiff demurâ— for he pleads in the affirm actâ—e he had discharged and shews not how 〈◊〉 This being a multiplicity of things if the general pleading be not good Cro. El. p. 253. Actâ— and Hill A Condition to give account of all Monies gathered by vertue of a Brieâ— c. the Defendant pleads he gave account of all such Monies ill Plea he ought to specifie what he had received or else to say he had received nothing 1 Keb. 760. Woodcot versus Cole A Condition to give a just and true account being a Bâ—s Clark the Defendant pleads performance the Plaintiff replies by receipt of 30 l. the Defendant rejoins it was stollen out of the Plaintiffs Count house the Plaintiff demurs the Robbery is a good Bar 2 Keble 761 779 830. Vere and Smith A Condition was to render a full account to the Plaintiff of all such Sums of Mony and Goods which were due and owing to W. N. at the time of his death which shall any ways come to the hands of the Defendant and shall upon such account within the space of one Week when required make an equal dividend of all such Sums of Mony and Goods and pay the Plaintiff his proportion of the same the Defendant pleads no Goods or Sums of Mony came to his
the Plaintiff demurs Judgment was given for the Plaintiff upon this point Because the Defeasance was pleaded to be made after the Obligation and if it would avoid the Obligation it should be made at the same time quod mirum Sandâ—s 2 Rep. 47. I should rather have conceived the Reason of their Opinion for the Plaintiff to have been for that it was an Obligation with a Condition and the Condition is it self a Defeasance and that a Defeasance upon a Defeasance is improper and confused but qu. â—e â—c ratione B. acknowledges a Statute to S. There was a Defeasance That if his Lands in the County of S. should be extended the Statute should be void Per Cur. the Defeasance is good and not repugnant because it s by another Deed but the Condition of a Bond not to sue the Obligation is void 〈◊〉 n. 1035. Trot and Spurling What amounts to a Defeasance and what not THat the Bond shall not be sued before such a Feast if he be sued it shall be void 21 H. 7. 23 30. The Defendant pleads in Bar That the Plaintiff by his Deed indented after the making of the Obligation grants to the Defendant that he will not prosecute or molest the Defendant by force of the said Obligation before the Feast of c. and demurs Per Cur. it s no Bar but a Covenant and if it were that he will not sue him at all that may be pleaded in Bar to avoid circuity of Action 1 Anderson p. 307. Dowse and Jeoffreys An Obligation from A. of 20 l. to T. B. with Condition if he paid T. B. 40 s. at such a day then it should lose its force and after B. was bound to A. in another Obligation which was indorsed on performance of Conditions specified in an Indenture and after the end of the Conditions endorsed on the last Obligation were these words Provided always that where the said A. is bound to the said B. in a Bond of 20 l. the said B. shall not sue for the Sum comprised in the said Obligation until the Condition specified in the said Indenture mentioned in this present Obligation be performed after A. sued the first Bond and B. pleaded this matter and averred that the Conditions in the Indenture are not yet performed Per Englefield and Shelly This is not a good Plea the Condition to defeat another Obligation is impertinent and the first Obligationâ— had an Indorsement on it which shall serve for the Defeasance of it 26 H. 8. fol. 9. Several Bonds were sealed for the payment of Monies and after by Indenture the Plaintiff did agree with the Defendant that if the Defendant should pay to Elizabeth the Daughter 500 l. and shall perform the other things c. that all the Obligations shall be void and be delivered up its was agreed this was a good Defeasance of the Obligation but for other Faults in the Plea Judgment pro Quer. Bridgmans Rep. 116. Lee and Wood. Memor I William I. do owe and am indebted to E. H. 10 l. for the payment whereof I bind my self c. In witness c. Memor That the said W. I. be not compelled to pay the said 10 l. until he recover 30 l. upon an Obligation against A. B. Per Coke That which comes after in witness is not part of the Deed but shall have its force as a Defeasance but then the Defendant must plead it 2 Brownl Rep. 98. Hammond and Jethro Per Coke A Man without a Defeasance may plead that the Statute was acknowledged for payment of a lesser Sum 1 Brownl 51. in Broksbys Case The Statute was defeasanced on this Condition If R. E. observe perform and accomplish the last Will and Testament of Sir J. E. his Father and pay and content all the Bequests and Legacies according to the true intent and meaning of the said last Will. Sir J. E. deviseth Land in Capite in Fee after his death R. E. enters into a third part of the said Lands by the major-part of the Judges the Statute is not forfeit Jones p. 267. Sir Rowl Egertons Case in Chancery If the Defeasances on a Statute be by Indenture and vary the words of the Defeasance are the Act and Words of the Conusee only and not of any other and if his part of the Indenture vary from that part delivered to the Conusor in that that it varies its utterly void 2 Anderson p. â—8 Hollingsworth and Wheeler Cro. El. 532. Hollingworth and Ascue H. in Aud. Querela upon a Statute surmiseth that there was an Indenture of Defeasance if he paâ— yearly for six years 50 l. to one J. B. at the Feast at St. Michaelmas at such a place c. the Statute should be void and avers that it was to J. B's use and that he tendred at every of the said Feasts 50 l. at the place and that J. B. was not there to receive it Per Cur. 1. Though J. B. was a Stranger to the Recognizance yet forasmuch as it is averred to be made to his use he ought at his peril to be ready at the place every day to receive it otherwise the Recognizance is not forfeit when the other doth tender it 2. Though he saith not nec aliquis alius ex parte sua was there to receive it its good for it ought to come on the other part if any were there to receive it 3. He saith at one of the days he was ready and offered to pay it and J. B. was not there ad exigendâ— recipienil so the copulative made the demand material which needed not yet the surmise was good for the matter is whether he tendred or not Câ—o. Jac. 13 14. Phillips versus Rice ap Hugh Cro. Eliz. 754. vide this Case well reported Yelv. p. 38. by the Name of Hughs and Phillips A Defeasance unless made the same day of a Statute and delivered uno flatu cannot be pleaded in Bar 1 Keb. 111. Sir Rich. Bellison Qu. In the next place I shall shew several sorts of Bonds as a Bond sued against the Heir Arbitrament Bonds Apprentices Bonds Bonds for the Good Behaviour c. Debt on Bond against the Heir HOW an Heir shall be charged on the Obligation of his Father at the end of Popham Jones p. 87 155. Bowyer and Rovil vide Siderfin p. 342. It must be brought in the debet detinet Lach. p. 203. Anonymus The Bill was on the File debet detinet but the Declaration on the Roll was detinet only which could not be amended after Verdict but leave was given to the Court to declare upon the old Bill being within three Terms he may declare because the Debt else had been lost because the Heir after the Bill entred had aliened the Term ibid Debt against an Heir in the detinet only is aided after a Verdict by the Statute 16 and 17 Car. 2. cap. 8. but not otherwise 2 Keble 259 290. Siderfin p. 342. Comber and Waltoe It s