whereof it is not possible for one to discharge and yet none can be presented to any of them which would be inconvenient Co. l. 4. 81. b. Sir Andrew Corbets case 2 Sir Andrew Corbet deviseth some of his lands to Richard Corbet and others Devise of Profits to raise a summe untill 800 l. shall be levied and received out of the profits of them besides all charges to be imployed for the preferment of his two daughters Marg. and Mary Robert Corbet sonne and heire conceals the will enters into the lands and enjoyes them fiâ—e years and dies after whose death the will being discovered Richard Corbet enters into the lands and raiseth 640 l. and imployes them according to the will but the question here arising was whether the profits taken by Robert Corbet and which the devisees might have taken shall be accounted parcel of the summe of 800 l. And in this case it was resolved that albeit the words be until the summe of 800 l. shall be levied c. yet it is as much in Law as if the words had been shall or may be levied And it was also held in case of a lease or limitation of use untill such a summe shall be levied that was as much to say as untill such a sum may be levied for otherwise great mischief would insue because in as much as he in reversion or remainder shall not enter untill the sum be levied it shall be in the power of those who are appointed to levie it to deferre the levying of it and so to exclude him in the reversion or remainder from taking the profits of the land for ever which would be inconvenient Co. l. 4. 9â— a. Dâ—uries case 3 If a Baron retaines two Chaplains according to the Statute of 21 H. 8. 13. and they purchase dispensation Chaplains and are advanced according to the Statute Here if the Baron discharge one of them from his service he cannot retaine another during the life of the Chaplain discharged for by that meanes he may advance as many Chaplains as he will even without number by which the Statute would be defrauded A like case to this was adjudged in C. B. 28 El. and after affirmed in B. R. in a writ of error Co. l. 5. 10. a. Housteads case 2 A feme sole makes a lease at will and after takes Baron Tenant at will Here the will is not determined by the intermariage for albeit the feme by taking the baron hath submitted her felfe to the will of her husband as her head yet in as much as it may be prejudicial to the husband to have the lease determine for then he should lose the rent payable at the next rent day after the mariage and because it will rather tend to the benefit than to the prejudice of the feme if the lease continue And also for that it may be a great prejudice to husbands who marie women that have tenants at will for the lâ—sse of their rents for these causes it was resolved that without expresse matter done by the husband after the mariage to determine the will it shall not determine Co. l. 5. 68. The L rd Cheyneyes case 5 Sir Th. Cheyney 1 El. deviseth Devise c. to H. his sonne and the heires male of his bodie the remainder to Th. Ch. of D. and the heires male of his bodie with condition that he or they or any of them shall not discontinue c. the question was whether T. Ch. should be received to prove by witnesses that it was the intent of the divisor to include his sonne within these words he or they And it was resolved by Wray and Anderson upon conference with other Iudges that he shall not for the construction of wills ought to be collected out of the words of the will in writing and not by collateral averment without because that would be subject to much inconvenience in as much as it would not then be possible for any man to know by the written words of the will what Construction to make or what advise to give when whatsoever shall be in that case done may be controled by collateral averments out the will â— 1 H. 6. 41. Co. Inst 1. 275. b. 6 If a man be disseised by two and releaseth to one of them Transmutation of estates he shall hold his Companion out but if tenant for life be disseised by two and he releaseth to one of them this shall enure to them both for he to whom the release is made hath a longer estate than he that releaseth and therefore the release cannot enure to him alone to hold out his Companion Descent 29. 13 E. 4. for then should the release enure by way of entry and grant of his estate and consequently the disseisor to whom the release is made should become tenant for life and the reversion revested in the Lessor which strange transmutation and change of estates in this case the Law will not suffer The l ke 7 If a man grant lands to A. in fée Littl. 720 722. Co. Inst 1. 377. Justice Richels Case Temps R. 2. upon condition that if he alien in fée his estate shall cease and be voide and that immediately from thenceforth the estate of the land shall remaine to B. and his heires here the estate to A. is good and he may lawfully alien notwithstanding the condition for his estate being an estate of Inheritance in lands and tenements it cannot cease or be voide before it be defeated by entry and then if this remainder should be good it must give an entry upon the alienée unto him that had no right before which would be inconvenient and against the expresse rule of Law because an entry cannot be given to a stranger to avoide a voidable act as appeares by Littleton in his Chapter of Conditions An Infants will 8 Because Littleton saith Sect 123 that the Guardian in Soccage shall render an account of the mariage money to the heire or his executors Here from this word executors some have collected Co. Inst 1. 89. b that an Infant of the age of 14 may make a will but the meaning of Littleton in that place is that if after the mariage he accomplish the age of 18 yeares he may then make a will and constitute executors to administer his goods and chattels for at that age he hath power by the Law to make a will and these words are to be understood as they may stand with Law and Reason Subsequent statutes expounded by the equity of former 9 The Statute of Glocester in 6 E. 1. cap. 3. ordaines Co. l. 8. 52. b. 4. in Syms case Pl. Co. 110. in Fulmerstons case that where the tenant by the Curtesie aliens his wives Inheritance with warrantie if assets descend to the heire he shall be barred for the value of the Inheritance so descended and if lands after descend that then the
then issue a sonne and a daughter And after the divisor dies also A. dies and B. dies without issue C. also and his wife die and the sonne hath issue a daughter and dies Here the question was whether the daughter of the sonne should have the land or no And it was resolved that she should not because in this case at the Common Law C. and his wife had but an estate for life with remainder to their children for life and then the cause or reason why they by the will should have an estate taile is onely grounded upon the intent of the divisor Howbeit it was resolved that such an intent ought to be manifest and certaine and not obscure and doubtfull because it will not then admit of any strained construction farther than the words themselves do import by a proper and genuine interpretation according to the Rules of Law Devise 5 If I devise lands to my sonne Thomas to hold to him and the heires male of his bodie for the terme of 500 yeares Co. l. 10. 87. a. Leonard Loves Case Dyer 7. pl. 8. 28 H. 8. his heire shall not have them but his executors for this terme is but a chattel and cannot be intailed and such a devisée may alien the terme if he please And Cook Chief Justice held that such a devise is but an estate for years because it is so in expresse words devised and that in this case against expresse words no inference or interpretation shall be admitted Tales 6 Tales de circumstantibus shall not be granted in an Assize by the Statute of 35 H. 8. 6. Co. l. 10. 105. a. Denbawdes Case because by the expresse words of that Act they are onely grantable in every writ of Habeas corpora or distringas with Nisi prius and no exposition can in this case be made against expresse words for viperima est ista expositio quae corrodit ventrem textus 7 If feme tenant for life take husband who makes wast Co. l. 5. 75. b. Cliftons Case and the feme dies Here the husband is not punishable for that wast because the Statute of Glocest 6 E. 1. cap. 5. is thus recited in the writ of wast Wast Quare cum de communi c. provisum sit quòd non liceat alicui vastum c. facere de terris c. sibi demissis ad terminum vitae vel annorum c. So that the land being not demised to the husband but he holding it onely for her life and in her right he shall not be chargeable for wast after the death of the wife by the expresse words of the Act as it is recited in that writ Devise 8 A devise of land by will is good without Probat Dyer 53. b. 11. 34 H. 8. because the Statute of wills ordaines onely that it shall be in writing and enjoynes no Probat and therefore if it be in writing and proved by witnesses it is good without Probat Tail of the King 9 If tenant in tail of the gift of the King Co. Inst pars 1 373. 1. the reversion to the King expectant is disseised and the disseisor levie a fine and five yeares passe this shall barre the estat tail notwithstanding the Proviso in the Statute of the 32 H. 8. cap. 36. So likewise if a collateral ancestor of the Donée release with warrantie and the Donée suffer the warrantie to descend without entry made in the life of the ancestor this also shall bind the tenant in raile because the words of that Statute are had done or suffered by or against any such tenant in taile And in this case he is not partie or privie to any act either done or suffered by or against him 17 Maledicta est expositio quae corrumpit textum Co. l. 2. 24. a. Baldwins Case 1 The Earl of Cumberland demises land to Anne and to one Anthony Baldwin her sonne and to the heires of the said Anthony Demise Habendum to them from the date for 99 yeares Here albeit heires are mentioned in the premisses yet is not the Habendum repugnant unto them but they have a joynt estate for yeares for it cannot be repugnant as to Anthony and yet good to Anne Viperima est ista expositio quae corrodit ventrem textus Co. l. 11. 70. a. Magd. Colledge Case Grants to the King Stat. 13 El. 10. 2 Grants to the King are restrained by the general words of 13 El. 10. for the words are to any person or persons Grants to the King of Church Livings bodie politique or corporate and the King is a person as it is said in 10 H. 7. 18. and a bodie politique as appears in Plowd fol. 213 234. Now therefore if the King be cléerely included in the letter if he shall be excluded out of the Act it must be by construction of Law and in this case the Law will make no such construction for the Quéen Lords and Commons who made the Act have adjudged as in the preamble appears that long leases made by Colledges c. are unreasonable and against reason much more estates in fée simple And the Law which is the perfection of reason will never expound the words of that Act against reason for maledicta est expositio c. 18 Nimia subtilitas in lege reprobatur Co. l. 5. 121. a. Longs case 1 Exception was taken to an Indictment Indictment because it was said to be taken coram W. S. Coronatore Dominae Reginae infra libertatem dictae Dominae reginae villae suae de Cossam praedict super visum corporis c. and doth not alleadge to what places the said libertie doth extend or whether part or any of the towne of Cossam be within the libertie and so it did not appear that the Coroner had any Iurisdiction in the place where the inquisition was taken nor where the murder was committed nor where the dead bodie lay for all is alleadged by the indictment to be at Cossam Howbeit the indictment was adjudged sufficient notwithstanding this exception for although it be true by the Rule of Law that indictments ought to be certaine yet it is to be observed that there are three sorts of certainties 1 To a common intent 2 To a certain intent in general 3 To a certain intent to each particular The first sufficeth in barres which are to defend and excuse the partie the second is required in indictments counts replications c. because they are to excuse or charge the partie the third is rejected in Law as too nice and curious for Talis certitudo certitudinem confundit And in this present case the indictment is certaine enough in general viz. that Cossam is within the libertie of Cossam but to imagine that the libertie may extend out of the town and yet the town it self to be out of the libertie is a captious and strained intendment which the
case and the Earle of Leicesters case Plow 400 c. Quae malo sunt inchoata c. A void presentment Fitz. 35 f. 6. 32 A presentment made by a stranger to an Advowson which is appropriate to an Abbey is void be the presentment in the Abbots time or during the vacation and albeit the Clerke be afterwards admitted instituted and inducted yet that cannot make the presentment which was void at first to take effect For Quod initio non valet c. It is otherwise if the Abbot himselfe present c. Co. l. 1. 15. b. 3. Sir William Pelhams case 33 A tenant for life remainder in tail remainder in fée bargains and sels the land in fée to B. who after the Statute of 32 H. 8. cap. 31. A void recovery and forfeiture by tenant for life and before the Statute of 14 El. cap. 8. suffered a recovery wherein A was vouched and vouched over c. and after Iudgement was entred and execution sued upon that recovery yet was the entry of the tenant in tail adjudged congeable for albeit the recovery was not had immediately against A. yet was it adjudged a forfeiture within that Statute of 32 H. 8. and then the suffering of the recovery being a forfeiture it could not afterwards be salved by entring Iudgement and suing execution thereupon Co. Inst pars 1. 46. a. 4. 34 If the Patron grant the next avoydance and after Parson A void grant of Glebe Patron and Ordinary before the Statute had made a lease of the Glebe for yeares and after the Parson dieth and the grantée of the next avoydance had presented a Clerk to the Church who is admitted instituted and inducted and dieth within the terme the Patron presents a new Clerk who is also admitted instituted and inducted here albeit he commeth in under the Patron that was party to the Lease and was Admitted Instituted and Inducted yet because the Lease had no good beginning but was avoided by the Grantees Incumbent who had the whole estate in him it shall not be againe revived but shall be extinct for ever and shall not be maintained against the last Incumbent Co. Inst pars 1 31. b. 4. 35 If a man be Tenant in general taile The last feme not endowed and take a wife and hath issue by her and she dies and after he taketh another wife and dies the last wife shall be endowed because she may have issue which by possibility may inherit But in this case if the husband during his first wives life alien the land in Fee and takes an estate back to him and his wife and the heires of their two bodies and the wife dies the second wife shall not be endowed because during the Coverture when her Title of Dower should take beginning he was seised of an estate taile special and yet here also the Issue that he may have by the last wife is inheritable Co. ibid. 9. a. 1. 36 B. having divers sonnes and daughters Grant to children before birth not good A. giveth lands to B. liberis suis and to their heires the Father and all his Children do take a Fee simple joyntly by force of these words their heires but if he had no child at the time of the Feofment the Child or Children born afterwards shall not take Dyer 58. a. 4. 35 H. 8. 37 Cestuy que use after the Statute of 1 R. 3. 1. Cestuy que us◠and before the Statute of Uses makes a Lease for yeares and after during the terme makes Feofment of the land and gives Livery c. In such case nothing passed by such Feofment because he had nothing in Vse or Possession and then the Statute of R. 3. would not aide him 29 Quod non habet principium non habet finem Where there can be no presentment by lapse 1 If the Bishop be named in the Quare impedit Co. Inst pars 1 344. b. 4. he shall never afterwards present by lapse and then shall neither the Metropolitan nor after him the King do it For the Bishops presentment falling which was to be the first step and begining their power of presenting which should successively follow his must néeds also fail according to the Rule Quod non habet principium non habet finem Right without action no remitter contra 2 Regularly a man shall not be remitted to a Right remedilesse Co. ibid. 349. a. 4. for the which he can have no action And therefore Littleton saith Sect. 661. that the principal cause of a Remitter is when the issue hath no person but himselfe against whom he may bring his Action by which it appeareth that he ought to have just cause of Action for neither an Action without a Right nor a Right without an Action can make a Remitter as if Tenant in tail suffer a Common Recovery In which there is error and after the Tenant in tail disseiseth the Recoveror and dieth here the issue in tail hath an action viz. a Writ of Error but so long as the Recovery remaineth in force he hath no Right and therefore in that case cannot be remitted Idem 3 If B. purchase an Advowson Co. ibid. 349. b. 3. and suffereth an usurpation and six Moneths to passe and the usurper granteth the Advowson to B. and his heires B. dieth his heire is not remitted because his Right to the Advowson was remedilesse viz. a Right without an Action 4 Vide infra M. 38. 1. 7. and 162. 49. Co. Inst pars 1 31. a. 4. 30 He that claimeth Paramount a thing shall never take benefit nor hurt by it Dos de dote peti non potest 1 If there be Grandfather Father and Son Co. Inst pars 1 32. a. 4. and the Grandfather is seised of thée acres of land in fée and taketh wife and dieth this land descendeth to the Father who dieth either before or after entry now is the wife of the Father dowable yet shall she have the thirds but of two acres onely and the wife of the Grandfather shall have for her Dower the other acre intirely because the Dower of the Grandmother is Paramount the Title of the Fathers wife and the seisin of the Father which descended to him be it in Law or actual is defeated and now upon the matter the Father had but a Reversion expectant upon a Fréehold and in that case Dos de dote peti non potest although the Grandmother die living the Fathers wife Dower according to the improved value 2 If the wife be entitled to have Dower of thrée acres of March Co. Inst pars 1 32. a. 3. every one of the value of twelve pence per annum the heire by his industry and charge maketh it good meadow viz. every acre worth ten shillings per annum the wife shall have her Dower according to the improved value and not according to the
vocation in Anno 11 Eliz. conveyed his lands to the use of himself for life and after to the use of Philip Earl of Arundel his eldest son in tail with divers remainders over and with proviso that if he should be minded to alter and revoke the said uses and should signifie his mind in writing under his own hand and seal subscribed by three credible witnesses that then c. and afterwards the said Duke was attainted of high treason In this case that proviso or condition was not given to the Quéen by the act of the 33 H. 8. cap. 20. because the performance thereof was personal and inseparably annexed to the person viz. to signifie his mind by writing under his own hand which none could do but the Duke himself upon which point all the possessions of the Dukedome so conveyed as aforesaid were saved and not forfeited by the attainder Vide 44. 8. â—o ib. 13. a. 3. 106 The Templers held divers of their possessions in Frankalmoign which tenure as Littleton saith Privity stâ—â—er then the â—â—neral word 〈◊〉 an Act of â—â—â—liament is annexed in privity to the bloud of the Donor and after they were dissolved and by Parliament Anno 17 E. 2. their possessions were given to the Hospitalers to hold them in the same manner as the Templers held yet by those general words they held not in Frankalmoign because the privity of the tenure on the Tenants part continued not and that privity being personal and inseparable by the general words of the act was not transferred to the Hospitalers There is the same law of the impropriation of a Church Founderâ—â— inseparabâ—â— which is also on incident inseparable to the house of Religion whereunto the Church is impropriate And therefore it is adjudged P. 3. E. 3. that the Hospitalers by the said Act of the 17 E. 2. should not have an Impropriation which was formerly inseparably annexed to the Corporation of the Templers because such a thing as that consisting in inseparable privity by the general words of an Act of Parliament shall not be transferred to others Co. l. 7. 13. a. 4. Englefeilds case 107 In tempore H. 8. Brook tit Corodie 3. it is holden Foundersâ—â— inseparable that a foundership which is inseparably annexed in privity to the bloud of the Founder shall not be forfeited by attainder â—ivity in â—oud estate â—â—d law diâ—â—rsities 108 There are three manner of privities viz. privity in bloud Co. l. 8. 42. b. 4 c. in Whittinghams case privity in estate and privity in Law Privies in bloud are meant of privies in bloud Inheritable and that is in 3 manners viz. inheritable as heir general heir special or heir general and special Privies in estate are as Ioyntenants Baron and Feme Donor and Donee Lessor and Lessee c. Privies in Law are as when the Law without bloud or privity of estate casts the land upon one or makes his entry congeable as the Lord by escheat the Lord that enters for Mortmaine Lord of a Villaine c. And first privies inheritable as heir general shall take benefit of Infancy and therefore if an Infant Tenant in Fée simple make feofment and die his heir shall enter there is the same Law also of him that is heir general and special as if a man give lands to another and the heirs male of his body and the Donée within age make feofment in Fée his Sonne that is heir general and special shall enter It is so also of him that is heir special and not general as if in the same case the Donée hath issue two Sonnes and the eldest hath issue a daughter and the Donee dies and the eldest Sonne within age makes feofment and dies without issue male the youngest Sonne is special heir per formam doni and shall avoid the feofment of his brother although he is not heir general because he is privie in bloud and hath the land by descent So if lands be given to one and the heirs female of his body and the Donee having issue a sonne and a daughter makes feofment within age and dies Here the daughter being heir special unto whom the right of entry descends shall enter and not the sonne unto whom nothing descends So it is likewise of the heir in Borough English for in all cases when any claimes by descent as heir special he shall take benefit of a right of entry which descends unto him for the infancy of his Ancestor There is likewise the same Law if his Ancestor were non compos mentis at the time of making the feofment because in those and such like cases the heir general cannot enter for that no right or title descends unto him but the right descends to the heir special Howbeit privies in estate unlesse it be in some special cases shall not take advantage of the infancy of the other and therefore if Donee in tail within age make feofment in fee and die without issue the Donor shall not enter because there was onely privity in estate betwéen them and no right accrued to the Donor by the death of the Donée So if there be two Ioyntenants in fée within age and the one maketh feofment in fee of his moitie and dies the survivour cannot enter by reason of the infancy of his companion because by his feofment the joynture was severed so long as the feofment remaines in force And therefore in such case the heir of the Feoffor shall have a Dum fuit infra etatem or shall enter into the moity But if there be two Ioyntenants within age and they joyn in a feofment in that case a joynt right shall remaine in them and therefore if one of them die the right shall survive and the survivor shall have the right of the land as from the first Feoffor which makes Littleton seem to hold cap. Discontinuance fol. 44. that the Survivour may enter in respect of the right accrued unto him For otherwise indeed this mischiefe would ensue that the heir of that Feoffor which died cannot enter for that the right survived nor yet the survivor because he shall not take advantage of the infancy of his companion but shall be forced to his writ of Right which without question he may have for that after the feofment the Ioyntenants might have joyned in it c. Lastly privies in Law as Lord by escheat Co. ib. 44. a. 4. c. shall never take advantage of the privity of infancy because he is a stranger to it and when the Infant dies without heire the feofment is unavoydable The same Law of Coverture and non same memory 109 A. grants lands to B. in tail Accruer of estate and farther that if B. or his heirs pay unto A. upon such a day at such a place xx s. that then B. shall have an estate of Fee-simple in the lands to him and his heirs In this case the privity of the estate
K. Bench sits 10 At the Common Law the Court of Marshalsie had jurisdiction of Pleas of the Crown and had a general authority in effect Co. l. 10. 71. a. 73. b. in the case of the Marshalsie as Iustices in Eire had for they were in part the Vicegerents of the Chiefe Justice of England within the Vierge Howbeit after that by the Statute of 28 E. 1. cap. 5. the Iustices of the Kings Bench were enjoyned to follow the Court the general authority of that Court as to those purposes vanished because they being onely the Vicegerents of the Chief Justice in his presence their authority ought to cease for in presentia majoris cessat potestas minoris c An entaile extinct in a Fee-simple 11 Sir Thomas Wyat being seised of divers Mannors in taile Dyer 115. 65 66. 1 2 P. M. the remainder in H. 8. in fee in the beginning of Quéen Maries reign forfeits them for treason whereby they escheat to the Quéen In this case the estate tail was utterly extinct and the Quéen is in of her ancient Fée-simple executed for she cannot be in of the Fée-simple determinable upon the entaile because then there would be two Fee-simples in the Qu which is absurd And therefore rather than so the entaile shall be merged in the Quéens ancient Fée-simple Errour 12 An Exigent is returnable by the roll Octabis Mich. but the writ of Exigent was returnable Mense Dyer 211. 32. 4 Eliz. and the Defendant was out-lawed betwixt Octabis and Mense and this was adjudged error because the roll is of more credit than the writ and determines it 62 The more worthy thing draweth unto it things of lesse worthinesse Finch 23. 1 The body of a man is more worthy than land The bodie more worthy than land therefore land shall follow the nature of the person as a Villein shall make frée land to be Villein-land but Villein-land shall not make a frée man to be a Villein So likewise the Kings land which he hath in his natural capacity Co. Inst pars 1. 15. b. 3. shall be demeaned according to the priviledge and prerogatives of his body royal As if the King hath issue a sonne and a daughter by one Venter and a son by another Venter and purchaseth lands and dieth and the eldest son enters and dies without issue the daughter shall not inherit those lands nor any other Fée-simple lands of the Crown but the younger brother shall have them Where note that neither possessio fratris doth hold of lands which are the possessions belonging to the Crown neither yet doth Half-bloud make any impediment to the descent of lands of the Crown as it fell out in experience after the decease of E. 6. to Quéen Mary and from Quéen Mary to Quéen Eliz. both which were of the halfe blood and yet inherited not onely the lands which King Edward and Quéen Mary purchased but also the ancient lands parcel of the Crown A man that is King by descent on the part of his mother purchaseth lands to him and his heirs and dies without issue this land shall descend to the heir of the part of the mother whereas in the case of a Subject the heire of the part of the father shall have them So King Henry the eighth purchased lands to him and his heirs having issue two daughters Quéen Mary and Quéen Eliz. and after the decease of E. 6. the eldest daughter Quéen Mary did inherit onely all the lands in Fée-simple for the eldest daughter or sister of a King shall inherit all his Fée-simple lands So it is also if the King purchaseth lands of the custome of Gavelkind and die having issue divers sons the eldest son shall onely inherit those lands And the reason of all these cases is as afore is said for that the quality of the person doth in these and many other like cases alter the descent so as all the lands and possessions whereof the King is seised in jure Coronae shall secundum jus Coronae attend upon and follow the Crown And therefore to whomsoever the Crown descends those lands and possessions shall descend also For the Crown and the lands whereof the King is seised in jure Coronae are Concomitantia And the lands and possessions belonging to the Crown do follow and attend upon the Crown as upon the more worthy c. Co. ib. 43. a. 4. 2 When the Royal body politique of the King doth méet with the natural capacity in one person The King no minor the whole body shall have the quality of the Royal politique which is the greater and more worthy For Omne majus trahit ad se quod minus est And therefore in judgement of Law the King Co. ib. 16. a. 1. as King cannot be said to be a Minor because in the Royal body politique there can be no minority So likewise if the right heire of the Crown be attainted of Treason yet shall the Crown descend to him and eo instante without any other reversal the attainder is utterly avoided as it fell out in the case of H. 7. c. Co. ib. 87. b. 3. 3 If a man be seised of a Rent-charge Rent-seck Things in grant follow land Common of pâ—sture or such like inheritance which do not lie in tenure and dieth his heire being within the age of 24 years In this case the heire may choose his Guardian but if he hold lands in soccage together with such like inheritances Then shall the Guardian in soccage not onely take into his hand the lands holden in soccage but such inheritances also because he hath the custodie of the heir c. Co. ib. 114. b. 2. 4 Albeit a man cannot prescribe to have bona catalla proditorum Of felons goods no perscription faelonum c. yet may they or the like priviledges be had obliquely or by a meane by prescription For a County Palatine may be claimed by prescription and by reason thereof to have bona catalla Proditorum felonum c. â—he grant of a â—annor pasâ—eth services 〈◊〉 5 Whatsoever passeth by livery of seisin either in déed or in Law Co. ib. 121. b. 2 may passe without déed and not onely the rents and services parcel of the Mannor shall with the demesnes as the more principal and worthy passe by livery without déed but likewise all other things regardant appendant and appertinent to the Mannor as incidents and adjuncts to the same shall together with the Mannor passe without déed and all these shall so passe without saying cum appertinentiis Priviledges â—â—nct 6 If A. be seised of a Mannor Co. ib. 121. b. 4. whereunto the franchise of waife and stray and the like are appendant and the King purchaseth the Mannor with the appurtenances Now are these Royal franchises remitted to the Crown and not any longer appendant to the Mannor c. Common
Law to give him cause of action and it is alwayes intended that every one will shew the best of his case c. But when the barre of the Defendant is insufficient in substance and the Plaintiff replies and shews the truth of his case whereby he produceth no matter against himself but matter explanatory or peradventure not material there the Court shall judge upon the whole record and the Count being good for insufficiency of the Barre without any regard to the replication judgement shall be given for the Plaintiff As if a man plead a grant by Letters Patents in Barre which are not sufficient the Plaintiff by replication sheweth another clause in the said Letters Patents which clause is not material the Defendant demurers in Law In this case judgement shall be given against the Defendant sic in simililibus Co. l. 8. 163. a. 3. in Black-amors case 7 Among the misprisions remedilesse by the Statutes made for the amendment of records this is one Misprisions 〈◊〉 Clerks that albeit the verdict upon issue tryed be given for the Plaintiff yet if upon the whole record it appears to the Court that the Plaintiff hath no cause of Action he shall never have judgement and so it hath béen often adjudged Co. l. 9. 53. a. 2. in Hickmots case 8 In debt upon an Obligation A release pleaded wiâ—â— exception the Defendant pleads a release of the Plaintiff c. which was in this manner A. doth acknowledge himselfe satisfied and discharged of all bonds debts c. made by B. the Defendant and it is agreed that A. shall deliver all such bonds as he hath yet undelivered unto B. except one bond of 40 l. not yet due wherein B. and C. stand bound to A. c. The Plaintiff replies that the obligation excepted and the obligation in Curia prolata are one and the same whereupon the Defendant demurres And in this case it was resolved that the exception extended to all the premisses because all the words before make but one intire sentence and the one depends upon the other For it is reason that when Bonds are satisfied that they should be delivered and exceptio semper ultimò ponenda est It was also reason that this bond of 40 l. should be excepted because it was not due when the release was made c. Co. l. 10. 99. b. 3. in Beawfages case 9 M. 10. Jac. upon a motion at the Barre it was resolved Bond taken by the Sheâ—â—â—â— not within 〈◊〉 the Statute 〈◊〉 23 H. 6. that an obligation to the Sheriff upon a Fieri facias for the payment of the money in Court c. was not void by the Statute of 23 H. 6. cap. 10. For the first branch of that Statute is that he shall let to baile by Writ or Bill c. which he could not do before as appears 19 H. 6. 43. The second shews the form of the body c. The third contains a penalty that if the Sheriff take an obligation in any other form c. than is there prescribed that it shall be voyd so that upon consideration of all the branches together and upon their coherence and dependance one upon another it plainly appears that the said Statute doth extend onely to obligations of such as are within their guard and custody and not otherwise Co. l. 10. 138. b 1 in Chester Mills case 10 Always such construction ought to be made of an Act af Parliament that one part thereof may agrée with the rest Exposition an Act. and that all may stand well together c. Co. l. 11. 44. a. 4 in Richard Godfreys case 11 The Iustices shall assesse the Fines of Copiholders upon the due consideration of all circumstances Copihold Fines Quà m rationabilis debet esse finis non definitur sed omnibus circumstantiis inspectis pendet ex Justiciariorum discretione And so it was adjudged in Communi Banco Inter Stallon Plaintiff and Brady Defendant P. 9. Jac. 1845. Rot. Co. l. 5. 79. b. in Fitz-herberts case 12 Tenant for life Warranty that comâ—ceth by dâ—sin the remainder to his sonne and heire apparent in taile by covin and agréement betwixt him and A. and B. to the intent to barre his son of his remainder by a collateral warranty makes a lease for years to A. who makes feoffment in fée to B. to whom the father releaseth with warranty and all this is by covin and consent betwixt the parties to the intent aforesaid After this the father dies and the warranty descends upon the sonne being then of full age Resolved per totam curiam that this warranty shall not barre the sonne because the feoffment of the Lessée for years is disseisin and the father himselfe is particeps Criminis and agréeing thereunto then albeit the release with warranty is made after the disseisin yet in as much as the disseisin was to such an intent and purpose the Law will adjudge upon the whole Act as it is agréed in 19 H. 8. 12. If a man disseise another with intent to make feoffment with warranty albeit he make the feoffment twenty years after the disseisin yet the Law will adjudge upon the whole act and the disseisin and warranty shall be coupled together according to the intent of the parties and therefore in such case the law will adjuge the warranty to begin by disseisin albeit they are made at several timâ—s So if a man make a lease of lands in two several Counties reserving an intire rent abeit the livâ—ry be made at several times first in one County and then in another yet the rent is issuing out of the lands in both Counties So likewise if a man make a charter of feoffment of certain lands with warranty and deliver the déed and after make livery of the land secundum formam cartae Here also the Law will adjudge upon the whole act and albeit the déed be delivered at one time and the livery of the land at another time and although a warranty ought to enure upon an estate yet upon the whole matter the warranty is good Eldest childe 13 The use of a recovery was limited by a Latin déed to the use of H. viz. he against whom the recovery was had for life Dyer 337. 36. 16 Eliz. the remainder Seniori puero de corpore H. in taile c. Afterwards H. covenants by an English Indenture to levy a fine to the use aforesaid wherein the use was limited to the use of the eldest child of the bodie of H. c. H. hath issue two children whereof the elder was a daughter and the younger a sonne And in this case it was adjudged that the daughter should have the land for albeit the word puero be indifferent to each sex and then the Male for dignity should be preferred yet because the English indenture hath declared the construction to be the eldest child the daughter shall have
of good pleading must be observed Co. Inst pars 1. 303. a. 2. which being inverted great prejudice may grow to the party tending to the subversion of Law Ordine placitandi servato servatur jus c. And therefore first in good order of Pleading a man must plead to the jurisdiction of the Court Secondly to the person and therein first to the person of the Plaintiffe and then to the person of the Defendant Thirdly to the Court Fourthly to the Writ Fifthly to the Action c. which order and form of Pleading you shall read in the ancient Authors agréeable to the Law at this day and if the Defendant misorder any of these he loseth the benefit of the former Again the Count must be agréeable and conform to the Writ the Bar to the Count c. and the Iudgment to the Count for none of them must be narrower or broader then the other c. 4 If the King make a Lease for years rendring Rent Co. l. 4. 13. a. 3. in Burroughs Case with condition to be void upon non-payment of the Rent Re-entry giâ—en to the King without demand the King shall take advantage of that condition without any demand For so long as the Reversion and Rent continue in the King the Law dispenseth with the demand as a thing un-decent it being against the dignity of the King to wait upon his subject or to demand any thing of him It is otherwise if the King grant over the Reversion for his grantée shall not take advantage of the Condition without demand of the Rent But in the other Case the Law which alwayes requireth that decorum and conveniencie be observed appoints the subject to attend upon his Soveraign and in that Case to perform the first Act although it be in the case of a Condition which trencheth to the destruction of his Estate Howbeit this is onely a personal Prerogative annexed to the person of the King for order and decencies sake and not in respect of the nature and quality of the Rent c. â—o demand 〈◊〉 the value of â—arriage 5 One Of the reasons which the Lord Cook addes in the Lord Darcies Case Co. lib. 6. 71. b. 2. in the Lord Darcies Case why the fingle value of the marriage of a Ward in Knight-service should be due to the Lord without demand is this If the Common Law saith he would have inforced the Lord to have made tender to his word c. it would also have appointed all necessary circumstances for the performance of such a tender as a certain place c. where it should be done and would not have left the Lord which is the superiour to finde out the Ward which is the inferiour and who may if he will take advantage of his own shifts when there can be no laches at all in the Lord c. 6 Amongst other reasons produced to prove None but of the houshold shall sue in the Marshalâ—â— that in Suits prosecuted in the Marshalsie Co. l. 10. 73. b. 2. in the Case of the Marshalsie one of the parties at least ought to be of the Kings houshold this is one because saith the Book it would not be comely that a Car-man or other Mechanical person should at his pleasure sue another in that Court and upon that occasion take liberty to appear in Aula Regis where that Court was originally kept absque vestimentis aulicis for those that appear in Court use to wear garments suitable to that place And therefore it is recorded by Luke the Evangelist cap. 7. vers 25. Coepit de Johanne dicere ad turbam c. Quid existis visuri hominem mollibus vestibus amictum Ecce qui vestitu magnifico utuntur c. sunt in Palatiis Regis c. And the Common Law regards conveniency and altogether dis-allowes indecorum and every thing done contra bonos more 's 77 Negatio Conclusionis est error in Lege Co. l. 10. a. 4. in Priddle and Nappers Case 1 In Attachment upon a Prohibition the Plaintiffe counts against A. proprietary of Tithes Lands in the Priors handâ— not tithable that heretofore the Prior of Montecute was seised of twenty Acres of Land c. before and at the time of the dissolution and held those Acres and also the Rectory simul semel c. Ratione cujus the Prior held the said Lands discharged of Tithes The Defendant conveys title to the Land c Absque hoc that the Prior held them discharged of Tithes c. Here the plea of the Defendant pro consultatione habenda for he is in a manner an Actor was insufficient because he traverseth a thing not traversable For the prescription of the unity ought to have béen traversed and not the Conclusion viz. Ratione cujus because as in Logick the conclusion of a Syllogisme cannot be denied but either the major or minor Proposition so neither in Law which is the perfection of Reason c. Co. ibid. 2 In a Praecipe Ancient Demesne one that pleads that the Mannor of Dale is ancient Demesne and that the Land in demand is parcel of the Mannor and so ancient Demesne there the Demandant cannot say that the Land in demand is not ancient Demesne because that is the Conclusion upon the two first preceding Propositions viz. 1. That the Mannor is ancient Demesne 2. That the Land in demand is parcel of the Mannor for sequitur conclusio ex praemissis and therefore it cannot be denied and with this agrées 41. E. 3. 22. 48. E. 3. 11. and many other Books 78 The Law respecteth the Bonds of Nature Co. Inst p. 1. 78. a. 2. 1 If before the Statutes of 32 34 H. 8. Wardship the father had infeoffed any of his younger sons or others for the making of his wife a Ioynture or for the advancement of his daughters or for the payment of his debts Co. l. 6. 76. a. 3. in Sir George Cursors Case and after had enfeoffed and conveyed the Land to his heir and had died his heir within age his heir should not have béen in ward neither was it Collusion upon the Statute of Marlbr cap. 6 c. because he was bound by the law of Nature and Nations to provide for them but now by force of those Statutes he shall be in ward for his body and for a third part of the Land c. No wardship â—uring the faâ—hers life 2 A. hath issue B. a daughter and his heir apparent who being married to C. hath issue by him D a son B. dies Litt. §. 114. Co. Inst ibid. a. 3 c. and A. that holds Land by Knights-service dies seised and the Land descends to D as heir unto A. and within age In this Case the Lord shall have the wardship of the Land but not the wardship of the hody of the heir for none shall be in ward for his body to
Vide Dier 150. 84. Co. ib. 207. a. 4 24 If a man make a single bond Condition collateral or acknowledge a Statute or Recognisance and afterwards make a defeasance for the payment of a lesser sum at a day if the Obligor or Conusor tender the lesser sum at the day and the Obligée or Counsée refuseth it he shall never have any remedy at Law to recover it because it differeth in quality from the sum contained in the Obligation Statute or Recognisance because if is no parcel thereof but contained in the defeasance made at the time or perhaps after the Obligation Statute or Recognisance And in such Case in pleading of tender and refusal the party shall not be driven to plead Uncore prist neither hath the Obligée or Counsée any remedy by law to recover the sum contained in such defeasance so likewise it is if a man make an Obligation of 100 l. with condition for the delivery of corn or timber c. or for the performance of an Arbitrement or the doing of any Act c. This differing in nature from the sum contained in the Obligation and being no parcel thereof is collateral thereunto And therefore in such Case also a tender and refusal is a perpetual bar The like Law it is of tender and refusal of money upon a Mortgage of Land because the money is collateral and differeth in nature from the land Dier 5. b. 26. H. 8. 1 2. 25 A man seised of land devisable by the custome lets it for years Rent reservâ—â— a chattel rendering rent and deviseth the rent to a stranger and dies and the stranger is seised of the rent and dies also In this case the rent being in its nature but a chattel shall go to the executor of the Devisée and not to his Heir 26 In debt against Executors brought in the County of Middlesex Debt against Executors the Defendants plead fully administred Dier 30. b. 206 28. H. 8. The Plaintiffe saith that they have Assets in Essex and thereupon the Defendants demurred and judgment was given for the Plaintiff because Assets in their nature is a thing transitory and not local and if it had been in issue and trial of a Iury of Middlesex they might have found the Assets in any County of England Rent-service apportionable 27 Rent-service was apportionable at the Common Law before the Statute of Quia Emptores terrarum Co. Inst p. 1. because there are divers kinds of Rent-service which are not within that Statute and yet were apportionable by the Common Law as if a man maketh a lease for life or years reserving a rent and the Lessée surrender part of the land to the Lessor or if the Lessor recover part of the land in an Action of wast or entreth for a forfeiture or granteth part of the reversion to a stranger or if tenant by knight-service by his last will in writing deviseth two parts of his lands In all these cases the rent shall be apportioned yet they are not within the words of the said Statute but the reason séems to be for that rent-service is of the nature of the land and therefore partable as it is partable according to Max. 64. It is otherwise of a rent charge because it is not of the nature of the land being against common right and collateral to the land Livery out of ward 28 A livery to be out of ward being in nature of a restitution Co. ib. 77. a. 4. shall be taken and expounded favourably And therefore if livery be made of a Mannor cum pertinentiis the Heir shall thereby have the Advowson appendant It is otherwise of Grants by Letters Patents Confirmation 29 If a Lease for life be made to two Co. Inst p. 1. 299. b. 1. to have and to hold the one moity to the one for life and the other moity to the other for life and the Lessor confirm their estate in the land to have and to hold to them and their heirs In this Case they are tenants in common of the Inheritance for regularly the confirmation shall inure according to the quality and nature of the Estate which it doth inlarge and increase 30 There being thrée Coperceners of land in Gavelkind in reversion Dier 128. a. 58 2 3. P. M. depending upon an Estate for life Partition the youngest aliens his part by fine in fée the tenant for life dies and the eldest son enters into the whole and then the second brother and the alienée bring a joynt writ of partition upon the Statute of 31 H. 8. 1. against the eldest brother But it was adjudged that it was not maintainable because they were entituled to writs of partition of several natures viz. the one to a writ of Copercenarie at the Common Law and the other to a writ of Partition by the Statute and therefore could not joyn â—eprivation 31 The President of Magdalen Colledge in Oxford being deprived by the Bishop of Winchester their Visitor Dier 209. 20. 3 4. Eliz. could not have an Appeal to the Delegates because the deprivation was temporal and not spiritual and therefore out of the Statute of 25. H. 8. 19. And so he was put to his Assise â—â—sance 32 Tenant for life of an house brings an Action upon the Case against one who stopped the way in his land Dier 250. 88. 8 Eliz. which time out of mind had béen a passage betwixt the house and a Park and albeit the Park was the Lessors and not the tenants for life yet it was held by the Count that such an Action lay not for the tenant for life but an Assise of Nusance 〈◊〉 in grosse 〈◊〉 rent 33 The Lord Dacres lets certain land and stock to friends Dier 275. 49. 10 Eliz. who covenant to pay 100 l. per annum to him and his wife his heirs assignes during the term and also 2000 l. at a certain day for the marriage-portion of his daughter he dies his son within age suffers more then a third part of all his land to descend after the Feme dies And in this Case it was adjudged that the Quéen should not have the 100 l. per annum but the executors of the Feme because in nature and quality it is not a rent which goeth to the heir but a sum in grosse 81 In persons the Law looketh at the excellency of some and giveth them singular Priviledges and preheminences above others as to the King the Queen his Wife Noblemen and Peeres of the Realme also unto persons of holy Church Co. Inst pt 1. 21. b. 3. 1 If the King give Land to a man with a Woman of his kindred in Frank-marriage and the Woman dieth without Issue Frank-marriage the man in the Kings Case shall not hold it for his life because the Woman was the cause of the gift but it is otherwise
these cases he may Co. l 10. 47. b. 3 in Lampets Case 26 A. Lessée for 500 years deviseth to B. for life and after his decease the remainder to C. and the heires of his body this executory devise the remainder to C. and the heires of this body this executory devise may be released to B. but cannot be granted to a stranger it is otherwise of an interest executed Fit 2. N. B. 83. b 27 If the Lord levie aide to marry his Daughter Aide for marring c. and do afterward marry her she shall not have an action against the executors of the father for that money it is otherwise if she were not married in his life time So it is also of the sonne not made Knight c. F. N. B. 120. f 121. c 28 If a man take a feme who is indebted to an alien Baron not chargeable without reco and the feme dies before that Debt is recovered by action in that case the Baron is not chargeable It is otherwise if it were recovered living the feme c. Pl. Co. 52. a. 1. Wimb Talb. Case 29 An heir in tail that hath a Reversion An estate executed and executory div or remainder really executed in him shall not néed to plead specially how he is heir it is otherwise where it is to be executed So if Administrators bring an action of Trespasse for Goods taken out of their own possession they shall not shew the Letters of Administration Otherwise it is for Goods taken in the life of the Intestate for there the possession of the Goods were never executed in them but to be executed Also if a Lease be made for life the remainder in taile and he in the remainder is seised after the death of the Tenant for life his issue shall have a Formedon and shall declare upon the immediate Gift neither yet shall shew the Déed otherwise it is if that estate were to be executed Pl. Co. 51. a. 3. Wimb Talb. Case 9 H. 6. 23. Pl. Co. 56. b. 5. contra 30 A man deviseth land to one for life An estate vested shall remaine the remainder to the right heires male of the Devisor and to the heirs of his body begotten the Tenant for life dies and the next heir of the Devisor being a feme enters and after had a sonne And there it was holden by the best opinion that the some shall not out the feme because the sonne born after shall not take away the land before vested in the feme as heir for default of such person then in rerum natura to take the devise Co. Inst p. 1. 117. a. 3. 31 If lands be given to Villain and to the heires of his body Villain and alien tenantâ— in tail and the Lord enters and after enfranchiseth the Donée and then the Donée hath issue yet that issue shall never have remedie either by Formedon or entry to recover the Land for that it was executed in the Lord before the enfranchisment of the Donée and the Statute de Donis giveth remedy to the Issues of the Donée that have capacity and power to take and retaine such a gift c. So it is also if lands be given to an Alien and to the heires of his body upon office found the land is seised for the King afterwards the King makes the Alien a Denizen who hath issue and dieth in this Case also the King shall detaine the land against the Issue c. â— fâ—eri facias â—câ—ted shall â—d 32 Sale by the Sheriffe upon a fieri facias shall stand Co. l. 8. 76. b. 4. Mathew Manuings Case albeit the judgment afterwards reversed and the Plaintiffe in it restored to the value Dier 363. 24. 〈◊〉 original 〈◊〉 judicial â—ll abate or 〈◊〉 abate 33 There is a diversity betwixt writs real original Co. l. 10. 134 in Read and Redmans Ca. which are as things executory writs real Iudicial which Issue from the judgment being in the nature of a thing executed And therefore if 2 coperceners bring a real Action and the one is summoned and severed and after dies having issue or no Issue in this Case the writ shall abate so likewise if 2 jointenants bring an Assise or other original real Action and the one is summoned and severed and dies the writ shall abate albeit the thing in demand servive But if two coperceners bring a scire facias which is a judicial writ upon a fiue levied c. and the one copercener is summoned and severed then dies without Issue such judicial writ shall not abate And so it is also of two joyntenants Howbeit if the copercener that dies hath issue it shall abate because the right descends â—â—â—ter â—câ—â—ed 34 If lands be given to a man and the heires females of his body Co. Inst p. 1. 357. a. 2 and he maketh a feofment in fée and take backe an Estate to him and his heires and dieth having Issue a Daughter leaving his wife grossement ensuit with a Son and dieth the Daughter is remitted and albeit the Son be afterwards borne he shall not devest the remitter because it was executed â—e feme reâ—ed after â—ontinuâ—e 35 If the Baron discontinue the land of the Feme and go beyond Sea Litt. § 677. Co. Inst p. 1. 356. b. 4. and the discontinuée leases the land to the Feme for life and gives her seisin and after the Baron returnes and dis-agrées to the lease and livery of siesin made to the Feme yet in this Case she is remitted to her ancient Estate because by the lease for life and livery the remitter was executed in the Feme and the Estate for life to the Feme which wrought the remitter is vanished and whole defeated And therefore dis-agréement of the husband can devest the Estate gained by the lease which by the remitter was actually devested before 〈◊〉 plenâ—â—ty â—â—re induâ—â—n 36 A Clerk is not enabled by the Stat. of 25 E. 3. 7. Dier 1. 8. 4 H. 8. by the word possessor to plead in barre before induction for by that his possession is executed and then he is possessor and not before â—eâ—ants in â—â—mon of 〈◊〉 Advowson 37 Thrée Tenants in common 〈◊〉 an advowson make composition Dier 19. a. 194 28 H. 8. that each of them shall present by term if each of them hath once presented by his turn by vertue of the composition in a Qu. Imp. brought after amongst them it is not necessary to shew the composition because it was executed it is otherwise in Case it were not executed And such composition cannot be without writing it is otherwise of coperceners for such composition may be by parol amongst them because they are privies and as one heire and are compellable to make partition â—sâ—uy que use â—render in 〈◊〉 38 Cestuy que use after the Statute of 1
the Rent Ipsae etenim leges cupiunt ut jure regantur Ibid. 13. a. 1. 2 If the heir of the part of the Mother of land The heir of the Voucher shall sue execution whereunto a Warranty is annexed is impleaded and vouch and judgment is given against him and for him to recover in value and dieth before Execution the heir of the part of the Mother shall sue Execution to have in value against the Vouchée for the effect ought to pursue the Cause and the recompence shall ensue the losse Co. Inst p. 1. 21. b. 1. 3 If lands be given by these words The word Frank-marriage create inheritance in Frank-marriage according to the Rules of Law then do these words create an estate of inheritance in special tail For the consideration of Marriage is in that case more favoured in Law then any other consideration in respect of the mutual recompence Ibid. 47. b. 3. 4 The Lessor for yeares must be seised of the Lands demised at the time of the Lease made The Lessor must be seised for in every Contract there must be quid pro quo because contractus est quasi actus contra actum And therefore if the Lessor hath nothing in the Land the Lessée hath not quid pro quo nor any thing for which he should pay the rent And in that case he may also plead that the Lessor non demisit and give in evidence the other matter Ibid. 78. a. 2. 5 If the Father enfeoffe his eldest Sonne Purchase bâ—â—â— fide a voideth Wardship or any of his younger Sonnes or others for the making of his Wife a Ioynture advancement of his Daughters payment of his Debt of the like and die his heir within age the heir shall be in Ward for his body and a third part of the land by construction of the Statutes of 32 34 of H. 8. but if his eldest Sonne or any of his younger Sonnes purchase Lands of the Father which are holden by Knight-service bona fide for a reasonable value the heir shall neither be in Ward nor pay Primer seisin Leonard Loveys Case Co. l. 10. 83. Ibid. 89. a. 4. 6 If a Guardian or a Bâ—yliff receive the conts and profits of the Lands and be robbed without their default or negligence A Carrier shalâ— answer Good robbed they shall be allowed them upon their Account but it is otherwise of a Carried H. Woodliefe Curties for he hath his Hiâ—e and thereby implicitely undertaketh the safe Delivery of the Goods delivered unto him and therefore shall answer the Value thereof if he be robbed of them Ibid. 99. b. 4. Pl. 306. b. Sheringtons Case 33 H. 6. 6. 39 H. 6. 29 7 The Mesne ought to acquit men of Religion Tenant in Frankalmeâ— ought to be acquit which hold of him in Frankalindigne of all Services to the Lord paramount for it is their duty to make prayers for their Founder and his heires and in consideration of those prayers the Founder c. is bound to pay to the Chief Lord all Rents and Services issuing out of that Land 14 E. 3. Mesne 7. Ibid. 101. a. 2. 18 H. 6. 2. b. per Newton 9 H. 3. Voucher 277. 8 If the Lord grant the Services of his Tenant by Homage Ancestrel Homage Ancestrel mixtures a Warranty in lanâ— the Tenant shall not be compelled in a per quae servitia to attorn unlesse the Conusée will grant in Court to warrant the Land unto him and if the Tenant vouch by force of this Warranty in Law it is a good Counter Plea that the Tenant or any one of his Ancestors recessit de servitio suo fecit servitium suum A. B. sine aliqua coactione de sua propria voluntate Ibid 102. a. 1. 9 If at a Sequatur sub suo particulo No Warraâ— Cartae or voâ—cher after a recovery in value both Tenant and Vouchée make default and the Demandant hath judgment against the Tenant and after brings a Scire facias to have Execution the Tenant may have a Warrantia Cartae or if he were impleaded by a stranger he may vouch again but if he had judgment to recover in value he shall never have a Warrantia Cartae or vouch again for by this judgment to recover in value he hath benefit of the Warranty Ibid. 102. a. 3. 10 The Lord that hath received Homage of his Tenant being vouched is thereby barred to disclaime â—â—ed eie for an 〈◊〉 c. 11 By the Ancient Law of England Ibid. 127. a. 3. if the Defendant in an appeale of Mayhem had béen found guilty the judgment against the Defendant had béen that he should lose the like member that the Plaintiffe had lost by his meanes as an hand for hand an eie for an eie c. 40 Ass 9. Mirror cap. 4. v. 5. Sect. 18. Britton cap. 25. fol. 144 145. Fleta lib. 1. cap. 38. The issue inâ—aile not barâ—ed without â—ecompence 12 In Littletons Case Ibid. 173. a. 1. § 260. where the eldest Sister hath the intailed Lands and the youngest the fée-simple Lands if the youngest daughter alien part of the Land in fée-simple and dieth so as a full recompence for the Land entailed descends not to her Issue her Issue may wave the taking of any profits of the fée simple lands and enter into the Land entailed for the Issue in taile shall never be barred without a full recompence Part of the â—â—me no satiâ—faction 13 Where the Condition is for the payment of 20 l. the Obligor or Feoffor cannot at the time appointed pay a lesser summe in satisfaction of the whole because it is apparent Ibid. 212. b. 4 Co. l. 5. 17. Pinnels Case that a lesser summe of money cannot be a satisfaction for a greater In Estate inâ—ile charged â—ithout fine or â—â—covery 14 It is commonly held Ibid. 143. b. 1 that Tenant in tail cannot alien or charge the Land in tailed without fine or recovery yet if a Disseisor make a gift in tail and the Donée in consideration of a release by the Disseisée of all his right to the Donée granteth a Rent-charge to the Disseisée and his heires proportionable to the value of his right this shall bind the Issue in tail albeit the Estate taile continue And this is in respect of the natural recompence â— Benefice â—harged withâ—â—â— the Paâ—â— 15 If there be Parson Patron and Ordinary Ibid. 343. b. 4. and the Parson by the Ordinance and assent of the Ordinary grant an Annuity to another having quid pro quo in consideration thereof this shall bind the Successor of the Parson without consent of the Patron â—nnanty my be anâ—exed to inâ—â—rporal â—â—â—ngs 16 Regularly a Warranty is onely annexable to frée-holds or inheritances corporeal yet to preserve mutual recompence Ibid. 366. a. 4 it may also be annexed to
being heir in appearance and he is not bound to dis-able himselfe â—â—ministratiâ—â—â—oid and â—â—able 6 If an Ordinary of a Diocesse commits Administration of Goods Co. l. 5. 29. b. 4. in Princes Case Were and Jefferies Case when they are bona notabilia such Administration is méerly void but Administration committed by the Metropolitan when the defunct had not bona notabilia is onely voidable because he hath Iurisdiction in all the Diocesses within the Province and therefore hath sufficient colour to do it Co. l. 6. 65. a. 3. in Sir Moile Finches Case 7 In 41 E. 3. 19. Rich. Tompson had Issue by Joan before mariage one Agnes and after he marries Joan and makes feofment in fée A Bastard takes by yâ— chase and retakes the Estate to himselfe for life remanere inde Agnetae filiae praedict Rich. Johanne and it was agréed that this was a good remainder without any averment that she was known to be their Daughter for albeit by the Common Law she was not their Daughter yet in as much as she had colour by the Ecclesiastical law which saith subsequens matrimonium tollit peccatum procedens this colour is sufficient in Case of a conveyance to make the remainder good and so note the diversity betwixt descent and purchase c. Co. l. 8. 101. per tout in Sir R. Lechfords Case The better opinion per Coke 8 If there be Bastard eigne and Mulier puisne Mulier beyonâ— sea c. and the Father die seised the Mulier being beyond Sea within age in Prison or of non sanae memoriae and the Bastard enter and continue in peacable possession of the Lands and hath Issue and dies and the lands descend to his Issue here the right of the Mulier is for ever bound because he hath colour of legitimation by the Law of Holy Church and the Common Law respects legitimation before the above-said Imperfections Vide plus ibid. Co. l. 10. 76. b. in the Case of the Marshalsea 9 If a Sheriffe holding his Torne after Michaelmas moneth takes there an Indictment of Robbery it is utterly void Things done by warrant contra being coram non judice But if the Court of the Common Bench in a plea of Debt award a Capias against a Duke Earle or c. which by the Law lyeth not against them and that appeares in the writ it selfe here if the Sheriffe arrest them upon the Capias albeit the writ be against Law yet because that Court hath jurisdiction of the cause the Sheriffe hath colour to do it and shall be excused and herewith accords Dier 60. b. 38 H. 8. So also if a Iustice of Peace make a warrant to arrest one for Felony who is not indicted albeit the Iustice erre in granting the warrant yet he that makes the arrest by force of that warrant shall not be panished by writ of false imprisonment because the Iustice is Iudge of the Cause Plow 83. b. 1. in Strange and Crokers Case 10 In 9 H. 6. it is said that if I grant to B. Maintenance that if my Tenant for life die during my life that then B. shall have the Land for 10 yeares Here if my Tenant be impleaded B. may lawfully maintaine in respect of the Colour of title he hath to the Land Co. Inst p. 1. 148. b. 4. 11 Entry into Religion and profession of a Disseisor shall not cause a descent to toll the entry of the Disseisée Bastard Mulier because it is the Disseisors owne Act and not the Act of God as death is yet if there be Bastard eigne and Mulier puisne and the Bastard before claime enter into Religion it is said such a discent shall toll the entry of the Mulier by reason of the colour of title that the Bastard had to the land and such an heire shall also have his age 114 It prizeth the Acts of God and of the Law more then those that are done by the party Co. Inst p. 1. 18. a. 4. 1 Fée-simple being as Littleton saith the largest Estate of inheritance that is Two Fee-simples one Fée-simple cannot depend upon another by the grant of the party as if Lands be given to A. so long as B. hath heires of his body the Remainder over in Fée here the Remainder is void yet in several persons by Act in Law a reversion may be in Fée-simple in one and a Fée-simple determinable in another by matter ex post facto as if a Gift in taile be made to a Villein and the Lord enter the Lord hath a Fée-simple qualified and the Donor a reversion in Fée but if the Lord enfeoffe the Donor now both Fée-simples are united and he hath but one Fée-simple in him â—â—ires female â—ill not take 2 When a man giveth lands to another man and the heirs female of his body dieth having issue a son a daughte◠〈◊〉 daughter shall inherit for the will of the donor the Stat. working 〈◊〉 it Co. ib. 24. b. 3 25. b. 3. 26. b. 4. which is upon the matter an act in law shall be observed but in case of a purchase it is otherwise for if A. have issue a son a daughter a lease for life is made the remainder to the heirs females of the body of A. A. dieth the heire female can take nothing because she is not heire for she must be both heire heire female which she is not because the brother is heire and therefore the will of the giver cannot be observed because here is no gift and therefore the Statute cannot work thereupon so it is if a man hath a son and a daughter and dieth lands are given to the daughter and the heirs female of the body of her father the daughter shall take nothing but an Estate for life because there is no such person she being not heire but where a gift is made to a man and to the heirs female of his body there the Donée being the first taker is capable by purchase and the heire female by discent secundam formam doni â—â—tes may 〈◊〉 altered 3 Regularly Estates cannot be altered from one to another Litt. §. 33. Co. ib. 28. a. unlesse all that have interest joine in the alteration thereof but by the Act of God estates may be changed without any act done by the parties that are interessed as if lands be given to a man and the heirs that he shall engender of the body of his wife here the wife hath nothing and the man is Tenant in special taile therefore in this Case if the Feme die without issue on her body begotten by the Baron the estate in special tail is by the act of God charged into tenancy in tail after possibility of issue extinct â—â—ging of â—â—tes 4 If a feofment in fee be made to the use of a man and his wife for the term
donative be disturbed the Patron shall have a Quare Impedit of this Church donative and the writ shall say Quòd permittat ipsum praesentare ad Ecclesiam c. and declare the special matter in his declaration And so it is also of a Prebend Chantery Chappel Donative and the like and no laps shall incurre to the Ordinary except it be so specially provided in the foundation Neverthelesse if the Patron of such a Church Chantery Chappel c. Donative doth once present to the Ordinary and his Clerke is admitted and instituted it is now become presentable and never shall be donative after and then also laps shall incurre to the Ordinary as it shall of other benefices presentable but a presentation of such a Donative by a Stranger and admission and institution thereupon is méerly void Co. ib. 367. a. 3 25 If the Tenant make a lease of the land to the Lord for yeares Segniory extinct or the Lord be Guardian of the Land or have it by Statute or Elegit and then make feofment in fee thereof to a Stranger Here albeit as to the Lessor this is a disseisin yet hereby the Lord hath extinguished his Seigniory Co. ib. 170 b. 1. 26 Husband and wife Tenants in special taile Parcenerâ— of certaine land in fée have issue a Daughter the wife dieth the husband by a second wife hath issue another Daughter and dies both the Daughters enter where the eldest is onely inheritable and make partition in this case the eldest daughter is concluded during her life to impeach the partition or to say that the youngest is not heire So likewise I. S. seised of lands in fée hath issue two daughters Rose bastard eigne and Anne mulier puisne who enter and make partition in this Case Anne and her heirs are concluded for ever â—â—â—dition to â—â—le farther â—â—ance by a 〈◊〉 not letâ—â—d 27 A. is bound with Condition that he and his son shall at any time after make better assurance of land sold to B. B. tenders a writing unto them the sonne being not lettered destres time to be advised of it Co. lib. 2. 3. b. Marsers Case which being denied he doth not deliver it In this Case albeit a man unlettered is favoured in the Law so as it is not his Act if the writing be not read unto him or rightly expounded although he deliver it yet here because A. undertooke that his son should do it and no certaine fine was limited for the doing thereof the bond in this case is forfeit for the time for doing of it was peremptory â—â—n not letâ—ed seales a â—ed 28 A lay-man not lettered is not bound to deliver a déed Co. lib. 2. 9. Thorough-goods Case if there be not a person present that can read or expound the déed to him in such language as he understands neither is he bound thereby if it be read or expounded to him in another manner then the words and matter thereof import and it concernes the party that should take it to sée that done if the party that should deliver it require the same but if the party that shall deliver the writing require it not to be done he shall be bound by the déed although it be indited contrary to his meaning Copi-hold â—â—rict 29 The King grants a lease of lands held of him by Copy to A. who assignes to the Copi-holder Co. l. 2. 17. a. 4 Lanes Case the King grants the reversion in fée to B. the terme for years expires here the entry of B. is lawfull for by the acceptance of the assignment of the term the copi-hold is determined 〈◊〉 tenants â—y prejudice 〈◊〉 another 30 As to the profits of the frank-tenement one joint-tenant may prejudice another for there is a privity and trust betwixt them Co. l. 2. 68. a. 3 per Popham in Tookers Case and therefore if one of them take all the profits of the land or all the Rent the other hath no remedy for the Law imputeth it to his folly to joine himselfe in Estate with such a person as will breake his trust So likewise if there be two Lords and a Tenant of land holden by Knight-service and the Tenant die his heire within age here the Lords have Election either to seise the Ward or to distraine for the services and so to waive the Ward as it is agréed in 1 E. 3. But in this Case if one of them seise the Ward and the other distraine for the services he that first seiseth or distraines shall bind the other â—eâ—â—ent upâ—â— Condition â—â—en 31 If A. enfeoffe B. of a Mannor with an Advowson appendant upon Condition that A. shall grant B. the Advowson during his life A. dies before he grants it In this Case the Condition is broken For when the feoffée or grantée upon Condition is to make an Estate to the feoffor or grantor and no time is limited for the doing thereof regularly it is true that the feoffée hath time to do it during his life if the feoffor or grantor do not hasten it by request for upon request and a day or time limited when he will have it done the feoffée or grantée ought to do it accordingly but if no Request be made and the feoffée or grantée who ought to performe the Condition die in this Case the Condition is broken for he hath not performed the Condition within the time prescribed to him by the Law which was during his life But this general Rule admits some exceptions which neverthelesse are agréeable to this Maxime for in this Case of an Advowson A. hath not time during his life albeit no request be made but also upon this contingent viz. if no avoydance fall in the meane time for if the grantée stay until an avoydance fall then ipso facto the Condition is broken for then B. cannot have the whole effect that by the re-grant he ought to have because that is to have all the presentations during his life the Advowson is become in another plight then it was in before So if A. enfeoffe B. the 1 of May upon condition that he shall grant to B. an Annuity or Rent during his life payable yearly at Mich. and La. da. in this Case the feoffée hath not time during his life to make this grant but ought to do it before Mich. for otherwise he shall not have the Annuity or Rent during his life and it may be collected upon the Booke of 14 E. 3. tit Debt 138. that in Case of the grant of a rent he shall not have time during his life Likewise if two not married be enfeoffed upon Condition to re-enfeoffe the Donor or feoffor c. and one of them die yet the other may perform the Condition but if he that survives hath a wife then is the Condition broken for if he made the re-enfeofment yet shall his wife be endowed And in all these Cases and the
it out of her and so to revive the discontinuance and revest the wrongful Estate in the discontinuée because Remitters tending to the advancement of ancient rights are very much favoured in Law so likewise if lands be given to a man and the heires females of his body and he maketh a feofment in Fée and taketh back an Estate to him and his heires and dieth having issue a Daughter and leaving his wife Grossement enseint with a Sonne in this Case also the Daughter is remitted and albeit the Sonne be afterwards borne he shall not revest the Remitter Litt. §. 678. Co. ib. 357. a. 3 20 If the Baron discontinue the land of the Feme The like and the discontinuée is disseised and after the disseisor demiseth the land to the Baron Feme for term of their lives this is a Remitter to the Feme for Remitters that restore ancient right are so much favoured in Law that the Estate made by the disseisor who cometh to the land by wrong and upon whom the entry of the discontinuée is lawful doth remit the wife and devesteth all out of the discontinue albeit he hath a warranty of the land Litt. §. 693. Co. ib. 363. b. 1 21 When the entry of a man of full age is congeable Right of entry if he take an Estate of the land for life in taile or in fée he is thereby remitted unlesse it be by Indenture matter of record or otherwise whereby he may be concluded or estopt It is otherwise where he hath but right of action for in that Case by taking such an Estate she shall not be remitted and so observe a diversity betwixt right of action and right of entry when his entry is lawful Co. l. 3. 86. a. 4. in the cases of Fines Iustice Windams Ca. 22 Where alienation was made in mortmaine 17 E. 3. 7. El. 20. Tenant not compellable to attorne A fine is levied of land holden in ancient demesne 31 E. 3. Tit. Ancient demesne 16. an infant levied a fine 36 H. 6. 24. Pl. 19. A fine levied of the reversion of land holden in Capite without licence 45 E. 3. 6. or where Tenant in taile of a reversion or remainder before the Statutes of fines 4 H. 7. 32 H. 8. had levied a fine thereof in all these cases and the like the Tenant was not compellable to attorn because the Estate that passed by the fine was not lawful but either prohibited by the Common Law or by some Statute and for the most part were voidable Co. l. 4. 26. a. 4. in the Copihold cases in Melwiches Case 23 The Lessée of a Copi-holder An Ejectione firmae gâ—anted to a Copiholder for a yeare may maintaine an Ejectione firmae for in as much as his term is warranted by the Law by force of the general Custome of the Realme it is reason that if he be ejected he should have an Ejectione firmae for that it is a spéedy course for a Copi-holder to gaine the possession of the land against a stranger being no more then what right requires to be yielded unto him for the recovery of his Estate Co. l. 5. 28. a. in the cases of Executors in Middletons Case 24 An Executor before probat may release an Action Release by Executor before probat good albeit before probat he cannot bring an Action because of the right of Action that is in him at the Common Law it is otherwise of an Administrator for if A. release and after take administration this shall not barre him for the right of Action was not in him at the time of the release made Vide 18 H. 6. 43. b. Greysbrockes Case Plowd 277 278. 21 E. 4. 24. To Executors prove the will and the third refuseth yet he may afterwards release for the ancient right that remaines in him Litt. fol. 117. If one be bound to pay a summe at the day to come before the day he cannot bring an Action of debt yet a release of all actions before the day barres him because of the present right and duty that he then had in him Co. l. 6. 1. b. in Bruertons ca. 25 If a man hold land by the service of ayding the Sheriffe Tenure for Justice not extinct or to be High-Constable of England which are for the advancement of Iustice for the determination of divers cases belong to the Court of the Constable and Marshal and the Sheriffe is a Minister of Iustice or if the tenure be ad custodiendum Recorda Domini Regis as the Abbot of St. Barthelm in Smithfield held as appeares in the Records of the Tower in 7 R. 2. membr 15. in Dorss in these and the like cases if the Lord purchase parcel of the tenancy yet the whole service remaines quia ista concernunt administrationem Justitiae Co. l. 6. 62. a. 3. in Catesbies Case 26 In Catesbies Case in the 5 Rep. the single point in question was A yeare for laps whether the six moneths of laps to give the Bishop power to collate should be accounted by 28 dayes for each moneth or by the halfe yeare and one of the reasons there alleadged for the account by the halfe yeare was this when a computation in such case is ambiguous it is always requisite to determine it for the reliefe remedy of him that right hath viz. of the Patron and for the preservation of his right to allow him the longest time of the two to the end he may not lose his right 〈◊〉 â—5 H. 8. 6 27 Vpon the Stat. of 35 H. 8. 6. to return a Tales Co. l. 10. 103. b. 2 in Alfrid Denbawds ca. albeit the title thereof is usually decem Tales yet the Sheriffe although there be but one Iuror appeare or all be challenged but one may at first return 11 to that one because it is for the spéeding of trials and that Statute being ordained for the furtherance and advancement of expedition in Iustice shall have a benigne and favourable interpretation â—â—ssisee 〈◊〉 28 If a man be disseised of a Mannor F.N.B. 33. q. to which an Advowson is appendant and the Advowson happen to be void the disseisée may present and have a Quare Impedit albeit he hath not entred into the Mannor by reason of the ancient right that is in him â—â—ers â—â—owson 29 If a man traverse an Office found of a Mannor F.N.B. 34. p. to which an Advowson is appendant and upon the traverse the King demiseth the Mannor to him without making any mention of the Advowson and after the Church is void here he that tenders the traverse shall have the presentment if the traverse be found for him â—â—â—ntment de Bishop 30 If a man recover an Advowson and the six moneths are past F.N.B. 38. f yet if the Church be void the Patron may pray a writ to the Bishop and shall have it and if the
a Son and a Daughter by one venter and a Son by another the eldest Son entreth and dyeth and the land descends to the Sister in this case the Warranty descendeth on the Son and he may be vouched as heire and the Sister as heire of the land In which and the other case of Burrow English the Sonne and heire at Law having nothing by descent the whole losse of the Recovery lyeth upon the heires of the Land albeit they be no heires to the Warranty Warrants 25. If a man doe warrant Land to another without this word Heires his heires shall not vouch and regularly Co. Inst pars 1. 384. b. 4. if hee warrant Land to a man and his heires without naming Assignes his assignee shall not vouch Howbeit if the Father be enfeoffed with Warranty to him and his heires and the Father enfeoffeth his eldest Sonne with warranty and dyeth In this case albeit the Warranty between the Father and the Son is by act in Law extinct yet the Law giveth to the Son advantage of the Warranty made to the Father because otherwise he should be without remedy occasioned by an act of Law which can do no wrong 26. It is against a Rule in Law Co. ibid. 390. a. 1. that a man should vouch himselfe Vide R. 54. Ex. 14. And yet if a man be enfeoffed with warranty to him and his heires of greene acre â—aâ—ranty and is also seised in fee of black acre in Burrow English and having two Sonnes enfeoffeth his eldest Sonne of greene acre in this case if the eldest Sonne be impleaded hee shall vouch himselfe and his younger Brother being heire in Burrow English for otherwise the eldest Sonne should be without remedy because the act in Law Viz. The descent hath determined the Warranty betweene the Father and the eldest Sonne â—arranty by â—â—fe and husbâ—â—d c. 27. Baron and Feme being one person in Law Co. ibid. 290. a. 3. 1. 103. b. 9. Dyer 2. p Mar. 315. b. 1. 15. Eliz. it is against the Rule of Law that they should vouch one another neither shall a Warranty be made use of while it is in suspence And yet if a man enfeoffeth a woman with Warranty and they intermarry and are impleaded and upon default of the Husband the Feme is received in this case the Feme shall vouch her Husband c. notwithstanding the Warranty was put in suspence by the intermarriage So likewise on the other side if a woman enfeoff a man with Warranty and they intermarry and are impleaded in this case the Husband shall vouch himselfe and his Wife by force of the said Warranty Albeit it be against another Rule of Law Viz. 54. before cited that a man should doe an act to himselfe And all this least the Husband or Wife in their severall cases should be without remedy Warranty Câ—parcener 28. Regularly Co. ibid. 174. a. 4. the Feoffee of one Coparcener shall not have ayde of the other Coparcener to deraigne a Warranty paramount And yet if there be two Coparceners and they make partition and the one of them enfeoffs her Sonne and heire apparent and dyeth and the Son is impleaded In this case albeit he be in by the Feoffment of his Mother yet shall he pray in aide of the other Coparcener to have the Warranty And the reason of the granting of this ayde is-for that the warranty between the Mother and the Sonne is by Law annulled and therefore least the Sonne should be prejudiced by Law which can do no wrong and so be left without remedy the Law giveth him albeit he is in by Feoffment to pray in ayde of the other coparcener to deraigne the warranty paramount Co. l. 3. 12. a. 3. in Sir Wil. Harberts case 29. Debt against the Heire In Debt against the heire upon an obligation made by the Ancestor the creditor could not at the common Law have had execution against any part of the Land whereof the debtor was seised in the life of the debtor himselfe but after his decease he might have had all the land descended upon the heire in execution untill he should be satisfied the debt because the common law giving action of debt against the heire if the debtor should not have had execution of the Land against the heire he should not have had any fruit of his action and so should have been left without remedy for the goods and chattells of the debtor did belong to his Executors or Administrators so as if land should not have been lyable to a debt of a common person at the common Law the creditor had been without remedy and yet the common phrase is Lands pay no debts Co. l. 4. 30. b. 3. in Shaw and Thompsons case 30. Dower Copy-hold In a Court Baron the damages to be recovered ought not to exceed forty shillings yet in a Copyhold Mannor where the custome is that a Feme shall be endowed if shee recover Dower with damages in the Lords Court albeit those damages exceed forty shillings yet are they recoverable in the same Court for otherwise shee should be without remedy because they are not recoverable by the common Law but onely in the Court of the Lord by Levari facias Co. l. 5. 88. a. 3. in Garnors case 31. At the common Law No capias in debt at the C. Law if a man had judgement in an action of debt and after judgement outlawed the Defendant in this case the Plaintiff was not at the end of his suit as to any processe to be further sued by himselfe for he could not have a Scire facias nor any other processe upon the Iudgement but was put to his new Originall as it is agreed in 13 H. 4. 1. a. 21 E. 3. 55. and 20 E. 3. Nonability 8. And albeit before the Statute of 25 E. 3. ca. Capias did not lye in debt nor the body of the Defendant before that Statute was subject to execution for debt yet in these cases if the Defendant be taken by Capias ut lagatum at the Kings suit no Laches being in the Plaintiff in continuance of his processe he shall be in execution for the Plaintiff if he will for albeit the property of all the Defendants goods and profits of his Lands are by the Outlawry vested in the King yet rather then the Plaintiff should be without remedy he shall hold him in execution for his debt and for that reason he shall in such case participate of the benefit as well as the King Co. l. 6. 41. b. 1. in Sir Anthony Mildmays case Co. l. 7. 39. b. in Lillingstons case 32. If a man by Deed grant a rent to another for his life Rent sued for by Executors provided that he shall not charge his person in this case if the rent be arreare and the grantee dye his Executors shall charge the person of the grantor
the Guardian cannot lose the Wardship An Infant payes releif 3. Littleton saith Litt. S. 112. Co. ibid. 83. b. 4. That the heire of a Tenant by Knight-service ought not to pay releife untill his age of twenty one years yet in some case the Heire shall pay releif when he was within that age at the time of the death of his Ancestor As if a man holdeth Lands of the King by Knight-service in Capite and of a common person other Lands by Knight-service and dyeth his heire being within age here the King hath the Wardship both of body and Lands by his Prerogative untill the full age of the heire and therefore in this case the Heire though he be within age shall immediately pay releif to the other Lord for as the Law giveth away the Wardship to the King by reason of his Prerogative so doth it in respect thereof reserve to the other Lord all that conveniently may be reserved viz. his releif The Lord shall not have the body 4. A man seised of Land holden by Knight-service hath issue a Daughter who takes Baron and hath issue a Son Litt. S. 114. Co. ibid. 84. a. 3. the Tenant dyes and also the Mother in this case the Son shall not be in ward for his body living his Father but yet the Lord shall have the Wardship of the Land untill the full age of the Son for albeit in this case the Law doth give the custody of the body to the Father and barreth the Lord thereof yet the Lord shall have the Wardship of the Land by force of the tenure of the first creation thereof So it is also if the Father marry his heire within age and dyeth in this case also the Lord shall have the Wardship of the Land Co. ibid. 88. b. 3. 5. Where the Father is Guardian of his Son for Land holden in Knight-service this is in respect of his paternall naturall custody Father Guardian in socage accountable and therefore in such case he shall not be answerable for his marryage or custody of his Lands but where the Father is Guardian by reason of a tenure in Socage he must by Law be accountable to the Son both for his marriage and also for the profits of his Lands which he should not be if he had the custody of his eldest son in this case as his Father in respect of nature And because the Law doth appoint him to be Guardian in Socage it compels him also to be accountable for the act of Law doth never any man wrong Co. ibid. 134. b. 2. Anic super carta cap. 15. 28. E. 1. 6. Before the Statute of Articuli super cartas In reall actions fifteen dayes returne in all Summons and Attachments in Plea of Land were contained the terme of fifteen dayes and it appeareth not onely by that Statute but likewise by the ancient Authors of the Law who wrote before that Statute that this was the ancient common Law And the reason of giving so many dayes in reall Actions was the Recovery being so dangerous that the Tenant might the better provide himself both of answers and proofes Co. ibid. 132. b. 2. 7. If I be disseised and my Brother release with Warranty Descent upon Profession and is afterwards profest in Religion and thereby the Warranty descend upon me In this case albeit the Law binds me by the Warranty yet I being his heire the Law gives me by descent such Inheritance as my Brother had at the time of his Profession Co. ibid. 137. a. 3. Litt. S. 203. 8. Albeit by an act in Law a man may have damnum Profession dischargeth wardship yet in such case it is alwayes absque injuria as if a Ward enter into Religion and be profest hereby the Lord loseth the Wardship of the Land which may be said damnum for by such Profession the Ward is civiliter mortuus a dead man in the Law and cannot hold any Inheritance neither can the Guardian continue the Wardship of the land because by the civill death of the Ward the Inheritance is descended to another but this damnum is absque injuria for by such Profession the land descends to another who is either to be in Ward or to pay releif And therefore in such case the law giveth the Guardian no remedy neither by any formed Writ nor by Action upon the case Co. Inst pars 1. 138. a. 3. 9. If Tenant for another mans life by his Deed grant a Rent charge to one for twenty one years Cesty que vie dyeth A annuity good the land evicted hereby the Rent-charge is determined and yet the Grantee may have during the years a Writ of Annuity for the arrearages incurred after the death of Cesty que vie because the Rent charge did determine by the act of God and the course of law Actus Legis nemini facit injuriam So it is also if land out of which a Rent-charge is granted be recovered by an eyent title and thereby the Rent-charge is avoyed yet the Grantee shall have a Writ of Annuity because the Rent-charge is avoyded by the course of law and so it was holden in Wards case cited in Co. l. 2. fo 36. in Heywards case against an opinion obiter in 6 H. 6. 42. a. Vide Max. 114. Ex. 13. Co. ibid. 149. a. 1. 10. A. hath common of Pasture sans number in twenty Acres of land Common sans number not apportioned and ten of these Acres descend to A. the common sans number is intire and uncertaine and cannot be apportioned but shall remaine but if it had been a Common certaine as for ten Beasts in that case the Common â—â—â—dition shall be apportioned And so it is also of common of Estovers Turbary Piscary c. And it is to be observed that in none of these cases or the like the descent which is an act in Law shall worke any wrong to the Ter-tenant for neverthelesse he shall have thereby that which belongeth to him for the Act in Law shall never worke any wrong The like 11. Of Common or Corody certaine as for ten beasts Co. ibid. 164. b. 4. so many Dishes in certaine c. partition amongst Coparceners or Apportionment may be made for this can worke no wrong to the Ter-tenant But if a man have reasonable Estovers as House-boot Hay-boot c Appendant to his Free-hold they are so intire that they shall not be divided amongst Coparceners So likewise if a Corody uncertaine be granted to a man and his heirs and he hath issue diverse Daughters this Corody shall not be divided between them there is the same Law also of Common sans number for in these cases and the like if Estovers Common Piscary or Corody uncertaine should be partable amongst Sisters such partition would worke a wrong to the Ter-tenant Co. ibid. 165. a. 1. who should be opprest and over-charged thereby which the Law
uncertainty Bract. fo 5. fo 400. Fleta l. 6. cap. 35. whereof Bracton and Fleta speak notably Sicut Actor una actione debet expediri saltem illa durante sic oportet tenentem una exceptione dum tamen peremptoria quod in dilatorijs non est tenendum quia si liceret pluribus uti exceptionibus peremptorijs simul semel sicut fieri poterit in dilatorijs sic sequetur quod si in probatione unius defecerit ad aliam probandam possit habere recursum quod non est permissibile non magis quam aliquem se defendere duobus bacalis in duello cum unus tantum sufficiat Vide pl. ibid. per totam paginam for departure double Pleas c. Attornement 22. If the Lord first grant the Services of his Tenant to one Co. ibid. 310. b. 1. and afterwards by another Deed of a later date grants the same services to another In this case if the Tenant attorne to the last Grantee it makes his Grant good and albeit he afterwards attorne to the other Grantee yet cannot that make the first Grant good because the Attornement took effect in perfecting the last Grant Howbeit in the same case if the Tenant attorn to them both the Attornment is void to both for the uncertainty so if a Reversion be granted for life and after it is granted to the same Grantee for years and the Tenant attorneth to both the Grants this is also void for the uncertainty A Fortiori if the Lord by one Deed grant his Seigniory to I. Bishop of London and to his heirs and by another Deed to I Bishop of London and to his Successors and the Tenant attorne to both Grants this Attornment is void for both Grants for albeit the Grantee be but one person yet he having severall capacities and the Grants being severall the Attornment is not according to either of the Grants and by consequent void for the uncertainty An uncertaine Deed. 23. If Land be given by Deed to two to have and to hold to them Co. l. 1. 85. a. 1. in Corbets case heredibus it is void for the insensibility and incertainty And although it hath a clause of Warranty to them and their heires this shall not make the first words which are incertaine and insensible to be of force and effect in Law albeit his intent appeare but his intent ought to be declared by words certaine and consonant to Law 24. In an Indenture of bargaine and sale for twenty pounds Dyer 6. 26 H. 8. 3. there are divers Covenants An uncertain Plea and in the end there are these words Ad quas conventiones perimplendas obligo me in 40 l. c. Here in debt brought for the 40 l. payment of the 20 l. is no Plea without an Acquittance albeit proofe may be made of the payment of the 20 l. yet without an Acquittance it remaines uncertaine whether the Covenants were performed and what other agreements there were betwixt the parties by Spilman Fitzherbert and Shelley and 28 H. 8. 25. accords Tamen Quaere for Dyer seemes to be of another opinion Dyer 14. 71. 28 H. 8. 25. If a Feoffment be made to four by Deed Livery without Deed. Livery to one is good for all It is otherwise if it be without Deed for the uncertainty Dyer 17. 95. 28 H. 8. 26. A negative pregnant is disfavoured in Law for the uncertainty A negative pregnant as in a Writ of Entry in consimili casu supposing the alienation to be in fee the Tenant saith that the Tenant for life did not alien in fee which implies that he did alien though not in fee for notwithstanding that Plea the Tenant for life might alien for another life or in tail and therefore no good Plea for the uncertainty Dyer 22. b. 138. 28 H. 8. 27. If a man buy twenty quarters of Graine No Detinue for graine of mony and is to have them delivered at such a place upon such a day and the contract is not performed by the Vendor In this case the Vendee cannot have an Action of Detinue for the Graine for the uncertainty because one quarter of Graine cannot be known from another quarter of the same Graine there is the like Law of Coine Dyer 25. 156. 28 H. 8. 28. An Inquest remained pro defectu hundredorum Defect of Jurors and the Plaintiffs Councell made suggestion to the Court that there were no Freeholders in the Hundred but all Copy-holders and Tenants in ancient Demesne and thereupon prayed Processe de proxim hundred adjacente non potuit habere for the Court are not to beleive the Councels suggestion for the uncertainty thereof but ought to have it ascertained by the returne of the Sheriff who is a sworn Officer Co. l. 1. 84. b. 4. in Corbets case 29. If Land be given to A. in tail the Remainder to B. in tail A perpetuity not good with other Remainders over upon Condition that if any of these shall offer to bar the said estate his estate shall cease as if he were naturally dead and then it shall be to the next in Remainder This is a void Proviso for the uncertainty for Iudges ought to know the intention of the parties by certaine and sensible words which are agreeable and consonant to the rules of Law Co. l. 1. 155. a. 3. in the Rector of Chedingtons case 30. A man possest of certaine Land for sixty yeares in consideration of a marryage to be had betwixt his Son and the Daughter of another Leases void for the uncertainty demiseth the Land to his Son for seventy years to begin after his death and after the Lessor dyes in the case the Lease is good because when the Land is demised Habendum after the death of the Lessor for seventy years there was sufficient certainty and no apparent uncertainty in the Deed as it was agreed in Locrofts case M. 34. 35 Eliz. But if a man possest ef a Lease for forty years grants to B. so many of the yeares as shall be behind tempore mortis suae this is void for the uncertainty as it is agreed in 7 E. 6. Br. Grants 154. and in Pl. Com. 520. b. So if a man have a Lease for life by Deed indented with Proviso that if the Lessee dye within sixty yeares that the Executors of the Lessee shall have it for so many years as shall be behind at the time of his death this is but a Covenant and not a Lease for the uncertainty Vide 3 4 P. M. Gravenors case Dyer 150. a. 22. Ass Pl. 37. Co. I. 2. 3. Mansers case 31. In debt by P. against M. the Defendant pleads the Bond was upon Condition that P. should enjoy the Land An uncertaine Plea which he held by Feoffment from M. discharged and indemnified and that M. and his Son should performe such Acts for further
fine by the husband of the wives lands shall not barr her entry after his death yet if she make not her entry within five years after her husbands death she shall be barred by the Statute of 32 H. 8. cap. 36. notwithstanding the said Statute of 32 H. 8. 28. for it will be imputed to her folly that she did not enter within the time limited by 32 H. 8. 36. â—â—â—d Mesne â—enant 22 If there be Lord Mesne and tenant Co. 9. 23. a. 1. in the case of Avowrie and the Lord distrains the tenant for rent arrear c. in this case the tenant ought to request the Mesne to put his cattel into the pound and thereby release the tenants and if the Mesne refuse so to do or otherwise acquit not the tenant by payment of the rent c. the tenant may have a writ of Mesne c. but if the tenant will replevy the Cattel and have deliverance of them himself and then the Lord avow upon a stranger In this case the tenant is without remedy by his own default for it will be accounted folly in the tenant that he did not request the Mesne to acquit him as aforesaid â—â—isoner 23 A Prisoner cannot wage his law for meat and drink had of the Gaoler Co. 9. 87. b. 4. in Pinchons case because the Gaoler being enjoyned by Law to kéep the prisoner in salva arcta custodia Inn-keeper is compellable to find him victuals But if a Victualler or an Innkéeper bring an action of debt for the victuals delivered to his Guest Guest the Guest may wage his Law for the Victualler or Innkeeper is not compellable to deliver his victuals to his Guest until he be paid for them and therefore it is his folly to part with them until he hath mony in hand for them Feme advowâ—on 24 If a feme purchase an Advowson and takes baron and the Church is void and the baron suffers an Vsurpation In this case F.N.B. 34. 5. the feme if she had presented before is put to her writ of right of Advowson but if she had not presented before she is without recovery for it will be attributed to her folly that she took such an husband as would not present upon the avoydance but suffer an usurpation It is otherwise if the Advowson came to her by descent Vide Max. 114. case 52. Bastard Mâ—â—â—er 25 If a man hath issue a Bastard and dieth Co. Inst pars 1. 244. a. 4. and the Bastard entreth and dieth seised and the land descendeth to his issue in this case the Collateral heir of the father is bound as well as where the father hath two sons Bastard eigne and Mulier puisne So likewise if a man hath issue two daughters the eldest being a Bastard and they enter and hold the land peaceably as heirs now the Law in favour of legitimation doth not adjudge the whole possession in the Mulier who then had the only right but in both so as if the Bastard hath issue and dieth her issue shall inherit and in the same case if both daughters enter and make partition this partition shall bind the Mulier for ever Vide supra 11. Proviso upon â—ale of land 26 A bargainée of land for 600 l. by another Indenture covenants to make back to the bargainor and his heirs such assurance of the land Dyer 361. 9. 2â— Eliz. as the Councel of the bargainor should devise within the year next ensuing provided that if the vendée made default in the assurance if he then should not pay 500 l. to the vendor that he would stand seised to the use of the vendor the vendor tenders no assurance and the 500 l. is not paid In this case the vendée hath the right of the land for it was the folly of the vendor that he required not the Assurance Winsors case 173 Negligentia semper habet infortunium Comitem Laches 1. Regularly Co. Inst pars 1. 246. b. 2. no laches or negligence shall be accounted in Infants or femes covert for non entry or claim to avoid descents yet laches shall be accounted in them for non-performance of a condition annexed to the estate of the land for if a feme be enfeoffed either before or after marriage reserving a rent and for default of payment a re-entry In that case the laches of the baron shall disherit the wife for ever And so it is of an Infant his laches for non-performance of a condition annexed to an estate either made to his auncestor or to himself shall barr him of the right of the land for ever And therefore if a man make a feoffment in fée to another reserving a rent and if he pay not the rent within a moneth that he shall double the rent and the feoffée dieth his heir within age the Infant payeth not the rent albeit the Infant at this day shall not by this laches forfeit any thing yet in such case a feme covert shall and the reason and cause of this diversity is for that the Infant is provided for by the Statute of Merton cap. 5. Non current usurae contra aliquem infra aetatem existen c. but before that Statute he could not have avoided such a penalty neither yet doth that Statute extend to a feme covert or to a condition of a re-entry which an Infant ought to perform because the breach thereof cannot be properly called usura Co. ibid. 250. b. 4. 2 If the father be disseised and make claim and the disseisor dieth Continual claim then the father also dieth In this case his heir may enter because the descent was cast in his fathers time and the right of entry which the father gained by his claim shall descend to his heir But if the father make continual claim and dieth and the son make no continual claim and within the year and day after the claim made by the father the disseisor dieth this shall take away the entry of the son for that the descent was cast in his time and the claim made by the father shall not avail him that might have claimed himself because no continual claim can avoid a descent unless it be made by him that hath title to enter and in whose life the dying seised was The same likewise holdeth in all respects of the predecessor and successor Co. ibid. 252. a. 3. Also if tenant for life make continual claim this shall not give away benefit to him in the remainder unless the disseisor died in the life of the tenant for life causa qua supra Co. l. 5. 13. b. 4. in the Countess of Salops case 3 Vpon Bailment of goods to kéep Bailment of goods when there is a confidence put in the Bailée an action upon the case will lie for negligence notwithstanding the delivery of them by the Bailor As in 12 E. 4. 13. A man delivers an
use and profit of the lessor for albeit a thing may sometimes sound for the profit of a man and not for his damage yet it is not lawful for a man to do a wrong As if a man see his neighbours beasts in another mans soil Damage feasant Damage feasant it is not lawfull for him to chase them and if he so do the owner shall have an action of trespass against him yet in so doing he doth a good work and saves the owner from the damages for depasturing his cattel Trespass 4 In 21 H. 7. A Parson brings an action of trespass for his Grain carried away the defendant saith Dyer ibid. pl. 39. that the Grain was severed from the 9. parts and in danger to be spoiled with Cattel whereupon the defendant carried them to the plaintifs own barn and there lodged them And yet this was adjudged no good plea because the carrying of them away was a tort So if a Commoner make a trench in the soil where he hath Common whereby the soil is made better yet he is a trespassor and subject to an action for it 5 Hob. 12. Holder against Tayler and 220. Wrenhams case who was censured in the Star chamber 1000 l. for publishing a scandalous book against a decrée of the Lo. Ch. Bacons 197 The Law favoureth things for the Common-wealth Incapable Officers 1 If an Office either of the grant of the King or Subject Co. Inst pars 1. 3. b. 2. which concerns the administration proceeding or execution of Iustice or the Kings revenue or the Commonwealth or the interest benefit or safety of the Subject or the like If these or any of them be granted to a man that is unexpert and hath no skill or science to exercise or execute the same the grant is meerly void and the party disabled by Law and incapable to take the same pro commodo Regis populi for only men of skill knowledge and ability to exercise the same are capable thereof to serve the King and his people So an Infant or Minor is not capable of an office of Stewardship of the Court of a Manor either in possession or reversion Neither yet is a man though never so skilfull and expert capable of a judicial office in reversion but must expect until it fall in possession Likewise bargaining or giving of money or any manner of reward c. for offices shall make such a purchasor incapable thereof because it is to be presumed he will by bribery extortion and other undue means make his stake good again to the prejudice of the Commonwealth which learning is worthy to be known but more worthy to be put in due execution Dower Câ—stles 2 Of a Castle that is only maintained for the private use and habitation of the owner a woman shall be endowed But of a Castle Co. ibid. 31. b. 3. that is maintained for the necessary defence of the Realm a woman shall not be endowed And so it was adjudged in the Court of Common Pleas where in a writ of Dower the demand was De tertia parte Castri de Hilderker in Comitatu Northumb. And the Statute of Magna Charta cap. 7. whereby it is provided Nisi domus illa sit Castrum is to be understood of a Castle for the necessary and publique defence of the Realm And this agreeth also with antient Records the effect whereof is Non debent mulieribus assignari in dotem Castra quae fuerunt virorum suorum et quae in Guerra existunt vel etiam homagia servitia aliquorum in Guerra existentia And so are the old books to be intended as it was resolved Trin. 17 Eliz. in the Court of Common Pleas. Vide infra 35. Co. ibid. 39. a. 4. Littl. §. 48. 5 If a man seised of 40 acres of land 20 holde by Knight service Dower de la plus beale and the other 20 in Socage die thereof seised his heir being under the age of 14 years his feme shall be endowed de la plus beale out of the Socage land and not out of the Knight service land for the Common Law giveth this privilege to the land holden by Knight service that it shall not be dismembred but in such case the whole dower shall be taken out of the Land holden in Socage And the reason is for that Knight service land is for the defence of the Realm which is pro bono publico and therefore to be favoured Co. ibid. 47. a. 4. 4 Things shall not be distrained for rent Distress which are for the benefit and maintenance of trades and by consequent of the Common-wealth and are there by authority of Law as a horse in a Smiths shop shall not be distrained for rent issuing out of the shop nor the horse c. in the Hostry nor the materials in a Weavers shop for making of cloth nor cloth or garments in a Taylors shop nor Sacks of Corn or meal in a Mill or Market nor any thing distrained before for damage fesant for it is in the custody of the Law and the like Co. ibid. 55. a. 4. 5 If Tenant at will sow the ground with grain hemp flax Tenant at will shall reap his câ—op or the like or set roots or sow or set any other thing which will yield an annual profit and after the same is so planted the lessor will out him or if the lessee dieth yet he or his executors shall have that years crop And the reason is for that the estate of the lessor is uncertain and therefore lest the ground should be unmanured which would be hurtfull to the Commonwealth he shall reap the Crop which he hath sowed in peace albeit the lessor doth determine his will before it be ripe There is the same reason also for every other particular estate that is uncertain And therefore if tenant for life sow the ground and dieth his executors shall have the Corn for that his estate was uncertain and determined by the act of God And there is the same Law of a lessee for years of the tenant for life So likewise if a man be seised of land in right of his wife and soweth the ground and dieth his executors shall have the Corn and if his wife die before him he himself shall have it If tenant pur terme dauter vie sow the land and Cestuy que use dieth the lessee shall have the corn If tenant by Statute merchant soweth the ground and then a sudden and casual profit falleth by which he is satisfied he shall have the embleaments If a man seised in fee hath issue a daughter and dieth his wife being enseint with a Son and the daughter soweth the land and then the son is born yet the daughter shall have the Corn because her estate was lawful and defeated by the act of God and it is good for the Commonweaith that the ground be sown But if husband and wife he
§. 209. as if a Lord of a manor will prescribe that every Tenant who matieth his daughter to any man without the Lords licence shall make fine This prescription is void being against reason because none shall make such fines but only villeins for a freeman may fréely mary his daughter to whom he pleaseth And albeit that it hath been objected by some that such a custom may have a lawful beginning because Littl. in the beginning of the chapter of villeinage § 174. alloweth that a freeman may take lands of the Lord to be holden of him viz. to pay a fine for the mariage of his son or daughter and therefore some have thought that such a custom generally with in the manor might be good but the answer is that although it may be soln a particular Case upon such a special reservation of such a fine upon a gift of land yet to claim such a fine by a general custom within the manor is against the fréedom of a freeman that is not bound thereunto by particular tenure howbeit a custom may be alleged within a manor that every tenant albeit his person be free that holdeth by bondage or native tenure the freehold being in the Lord shall pay to the Lord for the mariage of his daughter without licence a fine And this is termed Marchet of two french words Mariage and achecter to buy Co. ibid. 140. a 4. b. 1. Littl. §. 210. 6 The custom of Gavelkind in Kent where all the sons inherit equally Gavelkind hath been alwayes allowed a good custom because every son is as well a gentleman as the eldest and having means may attain to as great honor and preferment as the eldest which by want and penurie may be obstructed according to that of Horace Haud facile emergunt quorum virtutibus obstat Res angusta domi Co. ibid. 140. b. 3. Littl. §. 211. The like custom is used and allowed as reasonable in other parts of England within divers manors and seigniories although it be not called Gavelkind in any Country but Kent And as it is said of sons so likewise by custom when one brother dieth without issue all the other brethren may inherit There is also another custom allowed within divers manors called Borough-English Borough-English where the youngest son or youngest brother inherits and in the manor of B. in Berkshire where the sisters shall not be Parceners but the eldest sister shall have the inheritance all which do hold good because consonant to reason Co. inst pars 1. 141. a. 3. 7 Malus usus abolendus est and every usage is evill Malus usus that is against reason Quia in Consuetudinibus non diuturnitas temporis sed soliditas rationis est consideranda And by this rule at the Parliament holden at Kilkenny in Ireland Lionel Duke of Clarence being then Lieutenant of that Realm the Irish custom called there the Brehon-law was wholy abolished for that as the Parliament said it was no law but a lewd custom et malus usus abolendus est as is said before Co. ibid. 155. a. 2. 8 Albeit the writ of Assise be that the Sheriff Assise Faceret duodecim liberos et legales homines de vicineto c. videre tenementum c. Yet by antient course the Sheriff must return 24. and this is for expedition of justice for if 12. should only be returned no man should have a full Iury appear or be sworn in respect of challenges without a Tales which would be a great delay of trials so as in this case usage and antient course maketh a Law Co. l. 2. 17. a. 4. in Lanes case 9 Severance of the frank-tenement and inheritance of land holden by copy of Court-Roll Copyhold doth not extinguish or determine the Copy-hold estate for albeit his estate is taken to be but an estate at Will yet the custom hath so established the estate of the Copyholder that he is not removeable at the Will of the Lord so long as he performs the customs and services And by the same reason the Lord cannot determine his interest by any Act that he can do and so hath it been oftentimes adjudged in the Kings Bench. Co. l. 4. 21. a. 3. in Browns case 10 Albeit a Copyholder hath in judgement of law but an estate at Will yet custom hath so established and fixed his estate Copyhold that it is by the custom of the manor descendable and his heirs shall inherit it And therefore his estate is not meerly ad voluntatem domini but ad voluntatem domini secundum consuetudinem manerii so as the custom of the manor is the very soul and life of Copyhold estates for without custom or if they break their custom they are subject to the Will of the Lord And by custom a Copyholder is as well inheritable to have his land according to the custom as he who hath a franktenement at the Common Law for Consuetudo in this case est altera lex and being an usage time out of mind may create and consolidate Inheritances Alienation presented 11 A Custom within a Manor Co. l. 5. 84 a. 3. in Penimans cas◠that every alienation of lands holden of the same Manor whether it be by writing or feoffment thereof made or by will shall be presented at the next Court holden for the said Manor in pain that upon failer of such presentment such alienation shall be void is a good and reasonable Custom But a Custom that none shall use his Common in such a place until the Lord enter with his beasts is void for the unreasonableness for if the Lord will not enter it is no reason that the Commoners should lose their Common Vide 2 H. 4. 24. Common of Shack. 12 Common called Shack which at the beginning was but in nature of a féeding together by reason of Vicinage for avoiding of sutes is in some places by Custom altered to the nature of Common appendant or appurtenant Co. l 7. 5. a. Sir Miles Corbets case and in some places it retains the original nature and the Rule to know it is the Custom and usage of every several Town or place for Consuetudo loci est observanda And therefore if in the Town of Dale one hath gotten divers parcels of land together in which the Inhabitants have used to have Shack and long since did enclose it and nevertheless alwayes after harvest the Inhabitants have had Shack there for their Cattel This shall be taken for Common appendant or appurtenant and the Owner cannot exclude them from Commoning there albeit he will not Common with them but hold his own lands so enclosed in severalty And this is well proved by the usage for notwithstanding the antient enclosure the Inhabitants have had Common there But if in the Town of Sale the Custom and usage have béen that every Owner in the same Town hath enclosed his own land
he had been admitted and instituted to a Church whereof any subject had béen lawful Patron the Patron in that case had no other remedie to recover his Advowson but by a writ of right of Advowson wherein neverthelesse the Incumbent was not to be removed And so it was also at the Cōmon Law if an usurpation had béen had upon an Infant or a feme covert having an Advowson by descent or upon tenant for life c. the Infant feme covert and he in the reversion were driven to their writ of right of Advowson for at the Common Law if the Church were once full the Incumbent could not be removed And plenarty generally was a good plea in a Quare impedit or an Assize of Darrein presentment And the reason of all this was to the intent that the Incumbent might quietly intend and apply himselfe to his spiritual charge F. N. Br. 36. k. 143. a. Stat. 35. E. 3. 3. 13. R. 2. 1. 4 H. 4. 21. Howbeit at the Common Law also if any had usurped upon the King and his presentée had béen admitted instituted and inducted for without induction the Church had not béen full against the King the King might have removed him by Quare impedit and been restored to his Presentation for therein he hath a prerogative Quod nullum tempus occurit Regi neverthelesse in that case also he could not present for the pleanarty barred him of that neither could he remove him any way but by Action to the end the Church might be the more quiet in the meane time neither yet did the King recover damages in his Quare impedit at the Common Law But now the Statute of Westm 2. cap. 5. hath altered the Common Law in these cases And by that Statute the King is bound though not named 35 H. 8. 60. because it concerns the Church and Religion A Juris utrum taken against one tenant 6 Where a Juris utrum is brought against several tenants by several summons in the writ F. N. Br. 50. m. it may be taken against one tenant onely for that parcel and after against the others but it is otherwise in an Assize of Novel disseisin if it be not in some special case In a Quare Impedit a Non-suit peremptory 7 In a Quare impedit if the Plaintiff be non-suit after apparence Co. Inst pars 1 139 a. the defendant shall make title and have a writ to the Bishop and this is peremptorie to the Plaintiffe and is also a good barre in another Quare impedit and the reason of this is for that in this case the defendant in favorem Ecclesiae hath the said writ by judgement of the Court And therefore the Incumbent that cometh in by that writ upon such non-suit shall never be removed that being a flat barre as to that presentation And the same Law and for the same reason it is in case of a discontinuance c. A general accusation against a Parson or Vicar not good 8 In a Quare impedit against the Bishop it is not a good plea to alledge that the presentée is a Schismatick in general Co. l. 5. 58. b. Specots case but he ought to express Schisme in particular because it concerning the cure of souls is traversable and requireth more care and circumspection It is otherwise for the putting a Coroner out of his office for there a general suggestion in the writ that he is persona minus idonea is enough and not traversable But the reason is because this is but the keeper of the Rolles of the Crowne the other hath the cure and guard of souls Intire services remains after purchase of part by the Lord. 9 There is a diversitie concerning intire services to be reduced to the Lord as a spurre horse or the like Co. l. 6. 1. b. in Bruertons case Co. Inst pars 1. 149. a. for when they accrue to the sole benefit of the Lord and to the charge of the tenant if the Lord purchase part of the land the whole service is thereby extinct But when such intire services are reserved for works of devotion piety or charity as to marry a poor virgin yearly as you have it in 24 H. 8. Br. tenures 53 or to find a Preacher in such a Church or to provide ornaments for such a Church which tenure is in 35 H. 6. 6. In such case albeit the Lord purchase part yet the intire service remaines Protection 10 A spiritual person shall have a protection cum clausula nolumus to protect him his goods his farmers Co. Inst pars 1 131. b. and their goods from the Kings purveyors and carriages See the Stat. of 14 E. 3. Priviledge of Clergie 11 Before the Statute de articulis cleri cap. 15. Co. l. 11. 29. b. Alex. Poulters case he that confessed the felonie could not have the priviledge of Clergie because he could not make his purgation And although the Statute speakes onely of Abjuration and of an Approver yet the Iudges in favorem Ecclesiae extend it to all other confessions upon the Arraignement of the offender Tithes not extinct by unity of possession 12 If the Parson of a Church purchase a Mannor within his Parish here by this purchase and unity of possession the Mannor Dyer 43. p. 21. 30 H. 8. which was tithable before is now made non decimabilis because he cannot pay tithes to himself but if the Parson make a lease of his Parsonage and Rectorie to a stranger in this case the Parson himselfe shall pay tithes of his Mannor to the Lessée of the Rectorie or if the Parson make feofment of the Mannor the feoffée shall pay tithes to the feoffor being Parson because tithes cannot be extinct by any unity of possession as rent charge may which is issuing out of land but tithes are due by the law of God ex debito for the manurance and tillage of the occupier in whosoever hands the land comes unless it be in the hands of the Parson himselfe And therefore if the Parson let part of his Glebe land for yeares or life reserving rent the lessée shall pay the Parson tithes because they are due of common right vide Br. dismes 17. 2 Nunquam prosperè succedunt res Humanae ubi negliguntur Divinae Humane Affairs never succeed well where Divine Rites are neglected Co. Inst pars 1 246. a. 1. 1 Laches shall not prejudice an Infant in point of descent Laches shall prejudice an Infant c. but it shall be adjudged in him if he present not to a Church within six moneths for the law respecteth more the priviledge of the Church that the Cure may be served than the priviledge of Infancy F. N. Br. 160. c. d. 2 Men of Religion ought not to appeare at the Sheriffes turnes Clergy men not subject to personal charges nor the leet of any other without great cause and
servant unto whom they bare no former malice yet was it adjudged Murder because of their murderous intention which was the cause of his death it is otherwise when one having no malicious intent joynes himselfe with others that commit a murder for that is but Man-slaughter in him that so suddenly joynes with them 44 E. 3. 14. b. 14 Ass Pl. 20. Finch 10. 52 A man makes me sweare to bring him money to such a place Terrour or else he will kill me I bring it accordingly this is felony So if he make me swear to surrender my estate unto him and I do so afterwards this is a disseisin to me 21 E. 4. 68. b. Finch 10. 53 One imprisoned till he be content to make an Obligation at another place and afterwards he doth so being at large The like yet he shall avoid it by dures of imprisonment 3 E. 3. 84. Finch 10. 54 Outlawry in trespass is no forfeiture of land Outlawry in trespass in forfeiture as Outlawry of felony is for although the not appearing be the cause of Outlawry in both yet the force of the Outlawry shall be estéemed according to the heinousness of the offence which is the principal cause and foundation of the processe Villenage 55 A man and a feme sole have a villein Finch 10. and afterwards enter-marry and the villeine purchaseth land they shall not have the land by entierties but by moities Ioyntly or in Common as they had the villein An action for goods bailed 56 If one deliver goods to another 22 H. 6. 1. Co. l. 10. 51. b. Lampets case and after the Bailor release to the Bailée all actions the Bailée dies in a writ of Detinue brought against his executors they shall not take advantage of that release for that determines by the death of the Bailée and the action given against the executors is a new action although of the same nature grounded upon their own deteiner Election of an Annuity or distress 57 If a rent charge be granted to A. and B. and their heires Co. Inst pars 1 146. a. 1. A. distreineth the Beasts of the Grantor who sueth a Replevin A. avoweth for himselfe and maketh Conusance for B. A. dieth and B. surviveth Here B. shall not afterwards have a writ of Annuity for the election and avowry for the rent of A. barreth B. of any election to make it an annuity albeit he assented not to be the avowry because in that case the act of one joyn-tenant barreth the other and the election takes his rise from several causes viz. the land or the person and therefore when the election once fixeth upon the land it cannot afterwards charge the person It is otherwise when a man may have election to have several remedies for a thing that is méerly personal or méerely real from the beginning 28 E. 3. 98 b. 27 E. 3. 89. b. As if a man may have an action of accompt or an action of debt at his pleasure and he bringeth in an action of accompt and appeares to it and after is non-suit yet may he have an action of debt afterwards because both actions charge the person The like Law is of an Assise or of a writ of Entry in the nature of an Assise and the like 15 E. 4. 16. 10 E. 4 5. Co. Inst pars 1 295. a. 3. Wager of law 58 In an action of accompt against a receivour upon a receipt of money by the hand of another person for accompt render unlesse it be by the hands of his Wife or Commoigne the defendant shall not wage his Law because the receipt is the ground of the action which lyeth not in privity betwixt the Plaintife and Defendant but in the notice of a third person and such a receipt is traversable a 33 H. 6. 24. 13 H. 7. 3. a. 22 H 6. 41. 1 H. 6. 1. b. 8 H. 6. 11 c. But in an action of debt upon an arbitrament and in an action of Detinue by the bailment of anothers hand the Defendant shall wage his Law because the Debet and the Detinet is the ground of those actions and the contract or bailment though it be by another hand is but the conveyance and not traversable Descent to Daughters yet no Coparâ—eners 59 Land is given to a man and his wife and the heires of their two bodies and they have issue a daughter the wife dies Littl. § 662 663. the husband takes another wife and hath issue another daughter and discontinues the taile and after disseiseth the discontinuée and so dies seised Here the land shall descend to both the daughters but yet they are not Coparceners because they are in by several Titles viz. the eldest is remitted by force of the intaile to the one moity and the other hath Fée simple by force of the descent from her father but in this case the eldest shall out the youngest by her action of Formedon Recovery in value 60 If the heir of the part of the mother of land Co. Inst pars 1 13. a. 1. Pl. Co. 292. 515 whereunto a warranty is annexed is impleaded and vouch over and judgement is given against him and for him to recover in value and dieth before execution the heir of the part of the mother shall sue execution to have in value against the vouchée for the effect ought to pursue the cause and the recompence shall ensue the losse Co. ibid. 201. b. 3. 61 He that will take advantage of a re-entry for non payment of rent must make demand of the same upon the land Demands upon the land because the land is the principal debtor for the rent issueth out of the land and in an Assise for the rent the land shall be put in view and if the land be evicted by a title paramount the rent is avoided and after such eviction the person of the Feoffée shall not be charged therewith for the person of the Feoffée was onely charged with the rent in respect of the grant out of the land c. Howbeit Homage or any other special corporal service must be done to the person of the Lord and the tenant ought by the Law of convenience to séek him Co. ibid. 210. a. 1. to whom the service is to be done in any place within England for that and the like services are due and issue out of the land in respect of the person c. F. N. Br. 150. d. 62 If a man recover in value against the baron by warranty of the ancestor yet the feme of the baron shall be endowed Dower because the recovery was had by force of the warranty made and not by reason of any eigne title to the land Dyer 13. 62. 28 H. 8. 19 E. 3. 63 If land be given in Frank-marriage Divorce and after the Donées are divorced the party by whom the
of Attorney to the Lessor to make Livery and the Lessor maketh Livery accordingly notwithstanding the Lessor shall enter for the forfeiture because the Lessor for life had a Frank-tenement in him whereupon the Livery might work but if Lessée for yeares make a feoffment in fée and a Letter of Attorney to the Lessor to make Livery and he make Livery accordingly this Livery shall bind the Lessor and shall not be avoided by him for the Lessor cannot in this case make Livery as Attorney to the Lessée because the Lessée had no Freehold whereof to make Livery but all the Fréehold was in the Lessor Dyer 5. b. 1. 26 H. 8. 27 A man seised of devisable land before the Statute of Uses Rent devisable makes a Lease for yeares rendring rent and deviseth that rent to a stranger and dies and the stranger is seised of the rent and dies In this case the executors and not the heire of the devisée shall have the rent because the rent was but a Chattel in the devisée Dyer 90. b. 8. 1 Mar. 28 If there be Lessor and Lessée Trees sold by the Lessor and the Lessor sells all his trées growing in such a close Here nothing passeth to the Vendée for albeit the Lessor hath a general property in them yet the special property thereof is in the Lessée because the wood and trees are parcel of the Lease who shall by force of his Lease have the shade and fruit thereof as also the branches and loppings for fuel and mending of fences And therefore if the Lessor fell trees without the licence or will of the Lessee a good action of trespasse lyeth for the Lessée against him So likewise in 5 H. 4. 59. the heire in Chivalry being in ward fells trées in the land in ward and the Guardian brings trespasse against him and he pleads the special matter in barre Sed non allocatnr per curiam c. 25 Things are construed according to that which was the beginning of them Vide Max. 63. 21. Priviledge of tenant by the courtesie 1 Tenants after possibility of issue extinct Co. Inst pars 1 28. a. 2. although upon the matter he be but a Tenant for life yet hath he 8 priviledges incident to his estate which the Law alloweth not to a bare Tenant for life in respect of the inheritance which was once in him which priviledges you may see Co. In. part 1. 28. a. 2. The like 2 If a woman Tenant in taile general taketh an husband and hath issue which issue dieth and the wife dieth also without any other issue Co. ibid. 30. a. 1 there albeit the estate in tail be determined yet shall the hushand be Tenant by the Curtesie because he was intitled to be Tenant per Legem Angliae at first upon having the issue before the estate in taile was spent And although in this case the estate be not consummate untill the death of the wife yet it hath such a beginning after issue had in the life of the wife as is respected in Law for divers purposes for 1 After issue had he shall do homage alone and is become Tenant to the Lord and the Avowry shall be made onely upon the husband in the life of the wife 2 If after issue a 34 E. 2. Cui in vita 13. 2 E. 2. Cui in vita 26. 10 E. 3. 12. Dyer 21. El. 3â—3 29 E. 3. 27. the husband maketh a feofment in fée and the wife dieth the feoffée shall hold it during the life of the husband and the heire of the wife shall not during his life recover it in a sur cui in vita for it could not be a forfeiture because the estate at the time of the feofment was an estate of tenancy by the Curtesie initiate and not consummate And it is adjudged in 29 E. 3. that the Tenant by the Curtesie cannot claime by a Devise and waive the estate of his tenancy by the Curtesie because saith the Book the Fréehold commenced in him before the Devise for terme of his life A Voyage Royal. 3 When the King makes Voyage Royal into Scotland to subdue the Scots Co. ibid. 71. a. 4. Littl. § 96. Co. ibid. 70. a. 1 Co. ibid. 108. a. 4. Vide infrà 10. c. M. 43. 12. Co. ibid. 164. a. 4. c Bracton l. 1. 66. Britt cap. 71. Fleta l. 5. c. 9. 6. c. 47. the Law accompteth the beginning of the forty dayes to be after the King entreth into the forreigne Nation for then the Warre beginneth and till he come there he and his host are said to go towards the Warre and no military service is to be done till the King and his host come thither Tenure in Capite 4 If one holdeth land of a common person in grosse as of his person and not of any Mannor c. and this Seigniory escheateth to the King yea though it be by attainder of Treason he holdeth of the person of the King but not in Capite because the original tenure was not created by the King 3 E. 3. B. tenures 94. 30 H. 8. 43. 28 H. 8. B. livery 57 c. Descent in Capita stirpes 5 In case of Coparceners sometimes the descent is in Stirpes viz. to Stocks and Roots and sometimes in Capita to Heads As if a man hath issue two daughters and dieth this descent is in Capita viz. that each daughter shall inherit alike as Littleton saith Sect. 241. But if a man hath issue two daughters and the eldest daughter hath issue thrée daughters and the youngest but one daughter All those four shall inherit but the daughter of the youngest shall have as much as the thrée daughters of the eldest Ratione Stirpium in respect of their mothers estate from which theirs took beginning and not Ratione Capitum for in judgement of Law every daughter hath a seveaal Stock or Root So if a man hath issue two daughters and the eldest hath issue divers sonnes and divers daughters and the youngest hath issue divers daughters the eldest sonne of the eldest daughter shall onely inherit and all the daughters of the youngest for this also is not in Capita but in Stirpes and in this case the eldest sonne is Coparcener with the daughters of the youngest and shall have one moity viz. his mothers part So that men descending of daughters may be Coparceners as well as women and shall joyntly implead and be impleaded c. Vide 26. 2. Littl. § 2â—2 Co. ibid. 178. b. 2. 6 The Lands in Frank-mariage to be put into Hotchpot Frankmariage Hotchpot and the Lands in Fée simple which descend ought to move from one and the same person for if they moved from several Ancestors they cannot be put into Hotchpot c. Co. ibid. 187. a. 4. 39 H. 6. 45. 21 R. 2. judg 63. M. 33. E. 3. 7 If Lands be given to
right of Inheritance or Frank-tenement which is supposed originally to commence by Livery shall not be transferred or be extinct without some Ceremony as first by re-entry upon the Disseisor and then by giving Livery or by that which doth tant amount viz. by release or confirmation to him 13 H. 7. 13. 20. c. And therefore it is commonly said in our Books that accord with satisfaction is a good Plea in personal Actions where Damages onely are to be recovered but not in Real Actions Co. l. 4. 55. b. 56. a. In the Case of the Sadlers in London 29 Ass 31. Pierce Partifields case 12 In Pierce Partifields case cited in the case of the Sadlers of London in the 4 Report fol. 55. An office found for the King cannot be quasht but by petition matter of record of as high nature b. it was found by office by force of a Diem clausit extremum after the death of one that held houses of the King in London that the Tenant died without heir whereupon the King grants them to Pierce P. for life who sueth a writ to the Major to put him into possession the Major returnes that the Tenant made his Will and gave them to his wife for her life who was yet in life and seised of the said houses together with one Jo. Digle her then husband P. P. outs Digle and his wife who thereupon bring a Scire facias against P. P. who demands Iudgement of the Writ because in as much as he was but Tenant for life and the reversion was in the King they ought to sue the King which they could not do but by petition And it was adjudged by all the Justices assembled in the Chancery that the Writ should abate and that Digle and his wife should sue by petition because for as much as the Kings Title was found by inquest of office upon oath the Title of the Subject ought also to appear by Record of as high nature viz. by like inquest of office upon oath and not by return of the Major onely for albeit that return be matter of Record yet is it not of so high and great regard in the Common Law as an office found by oath Co. l. 4. 55. a The Case of the Sadlers in London 13 At the Common Law The like when the King was seised of any estate of Inheritance or Frank-tenement by any matter of Record were his Title by matter of Record judicial as attainder c. or ministerial as office or by conveyance of Record by assent as fine Déed inrolled c. or by matter in fact and found by office of Record upon oath as alienation in Mortmaine purchase by Alienée the Kings villein escheat by death without heire c. he that had right could not have any traverse whereupon he might also have an Amoveas manum but was alwayes put to his petition of right to be restored to his Frank-tenement and Inheritance Howbeit he might have his Monstrance de droit and was not forced to his petition when the King was intitled by matter in fact as Villein Mortmaine Escheat Alien c. found by office and by the same office the Title of the party did also appeare as if a Disseisor did alien in Mortmain or to an Alienée or to the Kings Villeine or did die without heire in all these cases the party grieved might have his Monstrance de droit at the Common Law And so are the Books to be understood in 9 E. 3. 51. 13 E. 4. 8. a. 4 E. 4. 21. 33 E. 3. title Travers 36. Co. ibid. 14 It was found by office that T. by the Kings Licence married the Kings Niefe The like and that certaine Lands descended to the same Niefe which the Baron had aliened without the Kings leave his wife being the Kings Niefe to another and for that cause the land was seised whereupon the Alienée comes into the Chancery and sheweth all the case as it was found by office And therefore because all the truth of the case viz. the Niefe maried by his Licence the descent to the Niefe after the Coverture c. did appeare in the Office it was awarded that the Baron for that cause should hold by the Curtesie and that the Feme by his alienation should be put to her Action and thereupon by award the Alienée had restitution The like 15 It was found by Office that I. held of the King 30 Ass Pl. 28. Co. ibid. 56. a. and that M. his daughter and heire was of full age and had Livery and by another Office it was also found that the same I. had another daughter K. which was yet within age whereupon a Scire facias went out against M. and her husband c. who said that the land was given to I. and to his first wife the Mother of M. in taile and that K. was his issue of another wife and so M. sole heire but by award of all the Iudges all the land was seised into the Kings hand because the entaile was not found by any Office but onely that M. was general heire A Noble woman by marriage made ignoble 16 If a Woman be noble as Dutchesse Countesse Baronesse Co. l. 4. 118. b 4 Acton case Co. l. 6. 53. b. 2. The Countess of Rutlands Case c. by descent although she marie under the degrée of Nobility yet her birthright remaines For that is annexed to her bloud and is Character inde lebilis But if a Woman attaine Nobility by mariage viz. of a Duke Earle Baron c. and after the death of her first husband take another under the degrée of Nobility by this last mariage with one that is ignoble she hath lost the dignity unto which she attained by her first marying one of the Nobility for eodem modo quo quicquid constituitur dissolvitur And Quando mulier nobilis nupserit ignobili desinit esse nobilis Ecclesiastical Law founded by the Common Law 17 If it be demanded what Canons Constitutions Co. l. 5. Part 1. 32. b. The case of the Kings Ecclesiastical Law Ordinances and Synodals provincial are still in force within this Realme the answer is that it is resolved and enacted by authority of Parliament That such of them as have béen allowed by general consent and custome within the Realme and are not contrariant or repugnant to the Lawes Statutes and Customes of the Realme nor to the damage or hurt of the Kings Prerogative Royal are still in force within this Realme as the Kings Ecclesiasticall Lawes of the fame Now therefore as consent and custome hath allowed those Canons c. So no doubt by the general consent of the whole Realme any of the same may be corrected inlarged explained or abrogated Writing annulled by writing 18 Although Indentures being made for the declaring of the uses of a subsequent Fine Co. l. 5. 26. a. The Earle of Rutlands
Lord Cromwel and one Andrews Mich. 14 15 Eliz. But if the Tenant maketh a lease for life or a gift in tail this is a continuance of the privity and estate in the Tenant in respect of the reversion that remaineth in him because in that case the sée was never out of him c. Co. l. 8. 75. b. 3. The Lord Staffords case Co. ib. 103. b. 2. 8 If the Tenant by Homage Ancestrel alien his land The like and the Alienée is impleaded and vouch the Alienor albeit he cometh in by fiction of Law to many purposes in privity of his former estate yet to this purpose he cannot come in as Tenant by Homage Ancestrel because of the discontinuance of the estate and privity for that the tenancy was not continued in the bloud of the Tenant And therefore Britton saith Britt 170. a. Et come ascun soit vouche per homage le Seignior tende à averrer que le tenement dount il est vouche fuit translate hors del sanke del primer purchassour per feoffment ou per ascune autre translation en tiel cas soit le tenant charge de voucher son feoffor ou ses heires c. Howbeit if the land were recovered against the Tenant upon a faint title and the Tenant recover the same again in an action of an higher nature Here the Homage Ancestrel remains because in that case the right was a sufficient mean to preserve the privity and continuance So it is also if he had reversed it in a writ of Errour Co. ib. 103. a. 4. 9 If Cestuy que use after the Statute of 1 R. 3. 1. Cestuy qâ—â— use and before the Statute of Uses 27 H. 8. 10. had made a feoffment in fée upon condition and entred for the condition broken he should have detained the land against the Feoffées for ever for that the estate and privity was for the time taken out of the Feoffées and thereby dissolved for ever Co. ib. 117. a. 2. 10 The Lord shall not take advantage of any obligation covenant Things in action or other thing in action made to the Villein because they lie in privity and cannot be transferred to others Neither shall the Lord have a thing in action by Escheat for the same reason Co. l. 10. 48. a. 3. Lampets case Co. Ibid. Neither yet shall the Lord by voucher or otherwise take advantage of a warranty made to a Villein his heirs and assigns because it is in liew of an action and consists in privity c. Co. Inst pars 1. 130. b. 1. 11 Albeit the Vouchee Tenant by resceit Prayée in aide A protectiâ—â— cast for vâ—â—chee c. or Garnishée be no Parties to the Writ yet before they appear a Protection may be cast for them because when the Demandant grants the Voucher or resceit in judgement of Law they are made privie And although the Demandant counterplead the Voucher or resceit yet if it be adjudged for them and so they made privy in Law a Protection may be cast for them as aforesaid And so it is of the Garnishée a Protection may be cast for him at the day of the return of the Scire facias c. Co. ib. 146. a. 1. 12 If a Rent-charge be granted to A. and B. and their Heires Joyntenants in Avowry A. distraineth the beasts of the Grantor he sueth a Replevin A. avoweth for himself and maketh conusance for B.A. dieth and B. surviveth In this case B. shall not afterwards have a Writ of annuity because the election and Avowry for the rent by A. barreth B. of any election to make it an annuity albeit he assented not to the Avowry and this is by reason of the privity of their estate c. Co. ib. 170. b. 1. 13 Husband and Wife Tenants in special Tail have issue a daughter the Wife dieth Coparcenâ—â— the Husband by a second Wife hath issue another daughter both the daughters enter where the eldest is onely inheritable and make partition here the eldest daughter is concluded during her life to impeach the partition or to say that the youngest is not Heir and yet the youngest is a stranger to the Tail but in respect of privity of their persons the partition shall conclude for a petition between meer strangers in that case is void Howbeit the issue of the eldest shall avoid this partition as issue in Tail The like 14 I. S. seised of Lands in Fee hath issue two daughters Co. ib. 170. b. 2. viz. Rose bastard eigne and Anne mulier puisne and dieth Rose and Anne do enter and make partition In this case Anne and her Heirs are concluded for ever and this is by force of the Privity that is betwixt them â—ccompt 15 An action of Accompt must he grounded upon Privity Co. ib. 172. a. 4. for without Privity no Action of Accompt can be maintained viz. either a Privity indeed by the consent of the party as in such an action against a Receiver or Bailife for against a Disseisor or other wronged doer no account doth lie or a privity in Law ex provisione legis made by Law as against a Guardian in soccage c. â—lienation of 〈◊〉 property in 〈◊〉 â—â—parcenary 16 In coparcenarie if one of the parts be evicted by an eigne title Co. ib. 173. b. 2. Littl. Sect. 262. she that so loseth her part shall enter upon the rest to have recompence c. because yet the Privity which the Law creates betwixt them doth still remain but if one of the parceners sell her part and then the part which the other parcener hath is evicted c. In that case the parcener that so loseth her part shall not enter upon the Alienée for that by the alienation the privity is dissolved Littl. §. 260 And therefore if a man hath land in taile and also as much in Fée-simple and hath issue two Daughters and die and the Daughters make partition so that the entailed land is allotted to the eldest and the Fée-simple land to the youngest Here if the youngest Daughter alien the Fee-simple land to another in fée and hath issue and die the issue may well enter into the entailed land and shall hold it in property with her Aunt Yet shall not the eldest sister enter into half of the lands in Fee-simple upon the Alienee because by the alienation the privity of the estate was destroyed c. So it is also Co. ib. 172. b. 4. if the youngest Daughter had made a gift in tail because the reversion expectant upon an estate tail is of no account in Law for that it may be cut off by the Tenant in tail at his pleasure Exchange It is otherwise of an estate for life or years c. And what is said of parcenary is also true of exchange in point of eviction c. â—oparceners 17 If a man is
the Law 27 Eliz. Co. l. 3. 13. Sir Will. Herberts case 11 H. 7. 12. b. 2 Vpon a recognizance acknowledged by the Ancestor Equal interests require â—qual contriâ—â—tions or a judgement in an action of Debt given against him If he die seised of two acres whereof one is holden in Borough English or having issue two daughters which make partition or if he die without issue whereby part of his land descendeth to the heir of his fathers part and part to the heire on the part of his mother In all these cases if one onely be charged he shall have contribution against the other for they are in aequali jure Finch 20. Co. l. 2. 25. b. 4. The case of Banker 26 Ass Pl. 37. 3 If two four or more men being severally seised of lands Equal extenâ— joyn in a recognizance all their land must be equally extended Finch 20. Finch ibid. 4 This Rule doth chiefly shine and shew forth it self in the exposition of Statutes Exposition of Statutes by extending things there provided to mischiefs in the like degrées c. Finch ibid. 5 This Rule is also of great use for guiding the grounds and maximes of things which newly start up Grounds of Law according to the rule of the Common Law 23 H. 8. Fitz. 6 Vses at the Common Law were nothing Uses regardâ—â— as estates yet in time gaining greater regard to be imputed amongst Inheritances are now demeaned as other Inheritances at the Common Law so as possessio fratris shall be of them of lands in Borough English the use shall descend to the youngest son And now also these uses being turned into estates shall be demeaned in all respects as estates in possession Finch 20. 7 When custome createth Inheritance in Copy-hold lands Copihold 〈◊〉 Freehold and maketh the lands descendable Co. l. 4. 22. then shall the Law direct the descents according to the Maximes and rules of the Common Law to have a possessio fratris and the like But not to collateral things as tenancy by the Courtesie Dower descent to toll an entry Finch 20. Co. Inst pars 1 24. b. 1. 8 Equitie is a construction made by the Iudges Equity a coâ—struction mâ—â—â— by the Judges that cases out of the letter of a Statute yet being within the same mischief or cause of making the same shall be within the same remedie that the Statute provideth And the reason hereof is for that the Law-maker could not possibly set down all cases in expresse terms Aequitas est convenientia rerum quae cuncta coaequiparat quae in paribus rationibus paria jura desiderat And again Aequitas est perfecta quaedam ratio quae jus scriptum interpretatur emendat nulla scriptura comprehensa sed solum in vera ratione consistens Aequitas est quasi aequalitas Bonus judex secundum aequum bonum judicat Co. ib. 24. a. 4. aequitatem stricto juri praefert Et jus respicit aequitatem And therefore the cases set down in the Statute of Westm 2. are there put onely for examples of estates taile general and special and not to exclude other estates taile For Exempla illustrant non restringunt legem And this appears by the words of the same Stat. Auxi sont divers autres estates en le taile c. And herewith also agreed Littleton § 21. Carbonels case 33 Ed. 3. Taile 5. 3. E. â— 32. 18 Ass Pl. 5. 18 E. 3. 46. 1 Ma. Dy. 46. The Lord Barkleys case Pl. Co. 251. Co. ib. 53. b. 3. 9 Albeit the Statute of Glocester Wast and â—â—struction coâ—vertible which provideth remedy against wast speaketh not of the exile of Villeins yet that also is comprehended under the general word of waste so that exile or destruction of Villeins or Tenants at will or making them poor where they were rich when the tenant came in whereby they depart from their tenures is to be adjudged waste for waste and destruction in their larger sense are words convertible c. â—ivery of â—nds in ward 10 A livery of lands out of the Kings hands is in the nature of a restitution which is to be taken favourably Co. ib. 77. a. 4 For if livery be made of a Mannor cum pertinentiis the heir shall thereby have an Advowson appendant Howbeit it is otherwise in grants by Letters Patents 11 By the Statute of 2 E. 6. cap. 8. it is enacted Co. ib. 77. b. 2. That such persons as hold for term of years â—tatute Merâ—hant Staple â—legit c. â—ithin 2 E. 6. 8. or by copie of Court-roll or have any rent common or profit apprender out of any lands found in any office whereby the King is entitled to the wardship of the same lands or to the forfeiture of lands upon attainder of treason felony praemunire or any other offence may have hold enjoy and perceive their several estates interests and profits although they be not found in the office Here albeit those two estates onely are saved by the letter of the said Act yet it being a beneficial Law the estate of Tenant by Statute Staple Merchant Elegit and of Executors that hold lands for payment of debts c. are taken to be within the benefit of that clause which was doubted in 14 El. Dyer 319. â—ncertain teâ—ure found â— E. 6. 8. 12 Where an office is found by these words or the like quod de quo Co. ib. 77. b. 3. vel de quibus tenementa praedicta tenentur juratores praedicti ignorant or that the lands are holden of the King sed per quae servitia juratores ignorant neither of these shall be taken for an immediate tenure of the King in chief but in such cases a melius inquirendum shall be awarded as hath béen accustomed of old time And this provision is made by the Statute of 2 E. 6. cap. 8. And here albeit that Statute saith no more yet by the equity of the same Statute if the first office find a tenure for the King per quae servitia c. and upon the Melius the tenure is found for a Subject In that case the first office hath lost his force and need not to be traversed and the Melius is in the nature of a Diem clausit extremum or a Mandamus c. And this was but a declaration of the ancient Common Law as by these words of the same Statute as hath been accustomed of old c. it appeareth but if upon the Melius it be found again as uncertainly as before is said then it is in judgement of Law a tenure in Capite Howbeit if upon the Melius a tenure be found for the King Ut de manerio c. sed per quae servitia c. it shall be taken for Knight-service â—arons and Knights fees 13 At or before the Statute of Magna carta cap. 2. Co.
any Lord during the fathers life because the Law of Nature requires that the father during his life shall have the marriage of his heir apparent rather then the Lord or any other person whatsoever The Law is the same if D. had béen a daughter It is otherwise where the father dies living the mother when the Land holden by Knight-service descends to the son on the part of the father because the Law in that Case confides more in the father then in the mother c. Again this priviledge extends not to any collateral heir but onely to the son or daughter being heir apparent for albeit a man shall have an Action of Trespasse Quare consanguinem haeredem coepit and albeit the words be cujus maritagium ad ipsum pertinet because the wel bestowing of his heir apparent in marriage is a great establishment of his house yet that is to be understood as against a wrong-doer but not against a Guardian in Chivalry and the mother shall have the like writ for taking away of her son and heir apparent and yet the mother shall not bar the Lord by Knight-service of his wardship of his body as Littleton saith § 114. Qui ex filia tua nascitur in potestate tua non est sed patris sui Fleta l. 5. cap. 6. The like 3 Put the case there be Lord and Feme-tenant by Knights-service of a Carve of Land Co. ib. 84. b. 2. the Feme maketh a feoffment in fée upon condition and taketh the Lord to husband and have issue a son the wife dieth the issue entreth for the condition broken the Lord entreth into the Land as Guardian by Knights-service and maketh his executors and dieth In this Case the executors shall have the wardship of the Land during the minority of the heir but not the wardship of the body For albeit the Lord séemeth to have a double interest in the wardship of the body one as Lord and another as father yet as father and not as Lord in judgment of Law he shall have the wardship of the body of his son and heir apparent in respect of nature which was before any wardship in respect of Seigniories by Knights-service began And that wardship by reason of nature cannot be waved and claim made in respect of the Seigniorie And the executors of the father shall not have such a wardship which the testator had as father neither can such a wardship be forfeited by Outlawrie 33 H. 6. 55. 6. because it is due to the father in respect of privity of nature 9. 4 If the Sheriff or other Officer be of kindred or affinity to the Plaintiffe or Defendant Challenge to â—he Array and â—â—rour and that such affinity continue Co. ibid. 156. a 2. and 4. this is a cause of challenge to the Array as if the Sheriffe marry the daughter of either party or è converso this is a principal challenge so if there be affinity betwéen the son of the Sheriffe and the daughter of either party or è converso or the like albeit this is no principal Challenge yet is it a Challenge to the favour c. 5 If a Iuror be of blood or kindred to either party Consanguineus Co. ib. 157. a. 3 which is compounded of con and sanguìne â—o the Polles quasi eodem sanguine natus this is a principal Challenge to the Polles because the Law presumeth that one kinsman doth favour another before a stranger and how remote so ever he is of kindred yet the Challenge is good And if the Plaintiffe challenge a Iuror for kindred to the Defendant it is no Counter-plea to say that he is of kindred also to the Plaintiffe though he be so in a néerer degrée for the words of the venire facias forbiddeth the Iuror to be of kindred to either party 6 If a Body politique or incorporate sole or aggregate of many bring an Action that concerns their Body politique or incorporate Co. ibid. The like if the Iuror be of kindred to any that is of that body albeit the Body politique or incorporate can have no kindred yet for that those Bodies consist of natural persons it is a principal Challenge c. Co. ibid. 4. 7 Affinity or affiance by marriage is a principal Challenge The like and to the favoâ—â— and equivalent to Consanguinity when it is betwéen either of the parties as if the Plaintiffe or Defendant marry the daughter or Couzen of the Iuror or the Iuror marry the daughter or Couzen of the Plaintiff or Defendant and the same continues or issue be had And if the son of the Iuror hath married the daughter of the Plaintiff c. albeit this be no principal Challenge because it is not betwéen the parties yet is it a Challenge to the favour c. Co. l. 3. 38. b. 4. in Ratcliffes Case 8 Martha Wilcocks A maid conveyed away and married one of the daughters and co-heirs apparent of Eliz. the relict of William VVilcocks and then the wife of Ralph Ratcliffe dwelling in her mothers house at Hitchin being then under the age of sixtéen years and about fourtéen went from thence at two of the clock in the morning with the consent of the said Ralph to Bramfield being eight miles distant from Hitchin and there married Edw. Ratcliffe And in an Ejectione firmae brought by Luke Norton upon the demise of the said Edw. the issue was whether Eliz. the mother had the custody of Martha at the time of the said marriage for if she had then the Land of the said Martha being in soccage was to be lost for her life by force of the Statute of 4 5. P. M. cap. 8. which prohibiteth the conveying of a maid c. out of the custody and contracting Matrimony with her without the consent of her father if he be living or of her mother in case her father be dead c. in pain for the man to suffer imprisonment c. and for the maid to lose her land as aforesaid c. And in that Case it was resolved that Eliz. the mother had the custody of the said Martha at the time of the Marriage within the provision of the said Act for that Statute hath ordained two manner of new custodies viz. by reason of nature and by assignation And here the father of Martha being dead she is by nature left in the custody of her mother neither yet was the assent of Ralph Ratcliff the husband any thing at all material for the Statute hath annexed the custody to the person of the mother jure naturae which is inseparable and cannot by the marriage be transferred to the Baron but after the marriage remains onely in the mother c. Co. l. 3. 39. a. 4. in Ratcliffes Case 9 It is said No wardship during the â—â—thers life that if there be Lord and Feme tenant by Knights-service and the tenant make
King hath an Interest in the Land or shall lose Rent c. or services then the Court ought to cease until they shall receive a procedendo in loquela from the King c. F. N. B. 154. d. e. 85 If the King by his writ certifie the Iustices Justices to surcease upon the Kings Certificat that the Lands are in his custodie by reason of the nonage of some heire taken by Inquisition and returned into the Chancery commanding them that they shall not procéed Rege Inconsulto In that Case it séemes that the Iustices ought to cease for the present albeit there be no such Office found nor returned for they are bound to give credit to the Kings certificate albeit that it be not true c. And in Assise de Novel disseisin if the King send his writ to the Iustices that the Defendant holds the Land put in view of the Kings gift for term of life by the Kings Charter commanding them not to procéed Rege Inconsulto here although the Tenant will not plead this yet it séemes that the Iustices ought to cease by that writ So if the King rehearse in the writ that the Tenant is in his service in warre beyond Sea or in Scotland and that he holds by Charter of the Kings grant for term of life commanding that they shall not procéed Rege Inconsulto but to continue the Assise untill a certain day there also it séems they shall surcease Because the Tenant cannot plead it for if the Escheator will say that he seised the Land into the Kings hand in an Assise brought by any person the Court shall surcease for that saying and by force of the Kings Certificate c. F. N. B. 106. c. 86 Men and Women of Religion are to be excused from appearing at the Sheriffs turne or at Leets unlesse it be for some great cause Men of Religion And if they be distrained to come unto them they may have a writ De exoneratione sectae c. out of the Chancery to discharge themselves of such service c. F. N. B. 159. c. 87 If Land descend to Coperceners Suit of Copeceners for which onely one suit ought to be done In this Case if the Land be holden of the King then all the Coperceners ought to make a suit as well after the partition as before But if the Land be holden of another Lord then the eldest Sister or her Feoffée shall onely make the suit c. And if the Lord do distraine the other Coperceners for that suit they shall have a writ De exoneratione sectae c. to discharge themselves of it c. Pl. Co. 76. b. in The Lord Willoughbies Case 88 If the King direct his writ Coronatoribus in Com. L. this is to be understood in the Kings Case Coronatoribus de Com. L. for the Kings writs in such Cases The Kings Writ will admit a favourable construction for the fulfilling of the Kings full intent c. Finch 81. 89 For the Kings prerogate see Finch 81. c. and elswhere throughout his whole Book under the several heads when there is any difference betwéen this Case an that of a subject Finch 83. 90 The King never dieth Demise Le Roy. but in Law it is said the demise of the King and a gift unto the King without more trencheth to his Successors 91 The particular prerogatives due to the King by the Common Law may be for that most part referred to one of the eight heads hereafter following notified in the outward margent by their several and respective letters as followeth 1 Divine perfection A 2 Infinitenesse B 3 Majesty C 4 Soveraignity power D 5 Perpetuity F 6 Justice G 7 Truth H 8 Omniscience I Ideot 92 Because every subject is by Law in the protection of the King Co. l. 4. 126. a. 2. in Beverleys Case who therefore is of right bound to defend his subjects persons and Estates and for as much as an Ideot is not able to governe himselfe or order his Estate The Law of England hath provided the King to be his Tutor to Govern and order both his person and Estate For the Statute of Praerogativa Regis made in the 17 of E. 2. cap. 9. was nothing else but a declaration of the Common Law c. Rent reserved 93 It is a Maxime in Law that the Rent must be reserved to him Co. Inst p. 1. 143. b. 4. from home the State of the Land moveth and not to a stranger but some do hold that it is otherwise in the Kings Case Upon a joint purchase tenement in common 94 If Lands be given to A. de B. Bishop of N. and to a secular man Co. ibid. 190. a. 4. to have and to hold to them two and to their heires In this Case they are joyntenants For each of them take the Lands in their natural capacity But if Lands be given to the King and to a subject to have and to hold to them and to their heires yet they are Tenants in Common and not Ioyntenants For the King is not seised in his natural capacity but in his Royal and Politique capacity in Jure Coronae which in respect of the Majesty of his Kings Person cannot stand in jointure with the seisin of a subject in his natural capacity And therefore if there be two joytenants and the Crowne descend to one of them the joynture is thereby severed and they are become Tenant in Common c. Grant in Mortâ—aine 95 It appeareth by Littleton § 140. Co. ibid. 99. a. 3 which my Lord Coke saith is a secret in Law that in the Kings licence to grant land to a Corporation there needs not any non obstante of the Statutes of Mortmaine for the King shall not be intended to be mis-conusant of the Law and when he licenseth expressely to alien to an Abbot c. which is in Mortmaine he needs not make any non obstante of the Statutes of Mortmaine for it is apparent to be granted in Mortmaine and the King is the head of the Law and therefore praesumitur Regem habere omnia Jura in scrinio pectoris sui for the maintenance of his grant to be good according to the Law Descent of â—etrage to Feâ—ales 96 When an Earldome or Baronie descends to one Daughter or other heire Female she shall solely enjoy both the Dignity and Lands Co. ibid. 165. a. 3. but where it descends to more heirs Females then one the Lands shall be divided as amongst other Coperceners Howbeit in that Case the dignity cannot be divided neither shall the Eldest have it as to be a Countesse Baronesse c. But in such case the King who is the Soveraigne of Honor and Dignity may for the uncertainty conferre it upon which of the Daughters he please this is to be intended when the Ancestor dies seised of Peerage in Fée-simple
â—ings in Aâ—â—n 97 If the King grant his owne recognisance the suit shall be in the name of the grantée but if he grant an obligation forfeited for outlawrie Dier 1. 7. P. 4 H. 8. the suit shall be in the Kings name â—e like Fuit dit 98 Bruerton who was attained 28 H. 8. had certaine obligations Dier 30. b. 208 28 H. 8. which were forfeited to the King and the King grants them to his Wife without any words that it should be lawfull for the grantée to bring Actions thereupon yet the Feme brings an Information in her owne name for the said obligations And upon demurrer thereupon it was adjudged that the Action was well brought because the King onely may grant a thing in Action Finch as Ley French edition Fol. 22. 99 The King may licence things prohibited by Statute The Kings â—cence as to coyn money which is made Felony by the Statute and before that it was lawfull for any one to do it because it is but malum prohibitum But malum in se as to levie a Nusance in the high way the King cannot licence a man to do but after it is done he may pardon it Howbeit if the Statute saith that his licence shall be void there the licence shall have a clause of non obstante 2 H. 7. grants 73. viz. shall say Notwithstanding any Statute to the contrary otherwise it is not good as the Statute of 23 H. 6. 8. ordaines that the Kings grant to be Sheriffe of any County longer then a yeare shall be void notwithstanding that his Patent shall have a Clause of Non obstante yet with a Clause of Non obstante such Patent shall be good Dier 52. 1. 33 H. 8. but not without that Clause Howbeit neither without such a Clause nor with it can he dispence with a Statute before it be made And therefore a licence to carie Bell-mettal out of the Realme notwithstanding any Statute made or to be made is not good if a Statute be made after to prohibit it for he cannot dispence with an Act of Parliament before it be made Howbeit he may in things wherein he hath an inheritance or interest as to grant to own to be discharged of taxes and subsidies to be granted this is good 11 H. 7. 11. b. Finch ibid. 100 Statutes of restraint bind not the King Knâ—ght not bound by Sâ—â— unlesse they concerne the Common-Wealth or he or the thing they concerne be specially named as the Statute of West 2. of entailes binds the King because it concernes the whole Com. Wealth so likewise the Statute of 1 H. 5. cap. 5. That in Indictments addition must be given to the party indicted bindeth the King because Indictments are specially named But if by Statute one be attainted and his Lands forfeit with a proviso that of such Lands as he was seised to the use of any other Cesty que use should enter upon him for it is not for the Common Wealth neither yet is the King named therien Co. l. 4. 35. b. 1. in Bozouns Case 101 When the king by the Common Law cannot make a grant Non obstante there a non obstante of that Common Law will not against the reason of the Common Law make the grant good but when the king may lawfully by the Common Law make a grant and the Common Law onely requires that he be so instructed that he may not be deceived there a non obstante supplying it stands with the reason of the Common Law and shall make the grant of the good And therefore if the King grant a protection in a Quare Impedit or an Assise with a non obstante of any Law to the contrarie such grant is void for by the Common Law a Protection lyeth not in either of those Cases for the damage that may happen to the Plaintife by such great delay And therefore in such Case a non obstante shall not availe where the King by the Common Law cannot grant the thing as it was Ruled in 39. H. 63. 9. Advowson Dier 226. 35. 6 El. 102 The King by his prerogative may make a Sheriffe without the usuall assembly and Election in the Exchequer Dier 288. 54 12 El. 103 The King may demise a Mannor Qâ— Imp. except the Courts and perquisites so cannot a Common Person Dier 351. 22. 18 El. 104 Some books are that by an usurpation the King shall be out of possession and put to his writ of right of Advowson But 35 H. 8. it is there that the King may gaine possession by presentment and plenartie by 6 moneths and that against an infant who is a purchasor Vide Fitzh Tit. Qu. Impedit 151. 8 E. 3. and M. 16 Trin. 38 E. 3. Stat. Westm 2. c. 5. Hob. 126. 105 In a Quare Impedit if the title appeare to the Court to be in the King albeit he be no party to the suite yet they ought to award a writ to the Bishop in his behalfe The Chancellor c. of Camb. against Walgrave 106 The Kings Certificate under his signet Manual was received as evidence in Chancery without exception Hob. 213. 3. in the Case of the Lord Aubignye against the Lord Clifton 82 Likewise the Law giveth greater priviledges to men then to Women Wardship â—ody Father â—ot Mother 1 A. Tenant of Land holden by Knight-service Litt. §. 114. Co. Inst p. 1. 84. a. 3. hath issue B. a Daughter and his heire apparent who being married to C. hath issue and dies A. dies seised and the Land descends to the issue within age In this Case the Lord shall have a wardship of the Land but not the wardship of the body of the heire for none shall be in ward for his body to any Lord during his fathers life It is otherwise where the Father dies living the Mother when the Land holden by Knight-service descends to the issue on the part of the Father because the Law in that Case confides more in and giveth more respect unto the Father then the Mother c. Villein 2 If a Villein taketh a frée woman to Wife Litt §. 187. and have issue betwéen them the issues shall be Villeins but if a Niefe taketh a Frée-man to her Husband their issue shall be Frée Feme no witâ—esse 3 In some Cases Women are by Law wholly excluded to beare testimonie as to prove a man to be a Villein Co. Inst p. 1. 6. b. 4. Mulieres ad probationem status hominis admitti non debent Fleta l. 2. cap. 44. Fitz. title Villein 32. 36 37. 83 The Law tendreth the weaknesse and debility of other persons as those out of the Realme in Prison Femes covert and other Women also Likewise Infants Lunatiques Ideots and such as have other imperfections â—ortion 1 If Coperceners make partition at full age and un-married Co.
Inst p. 1. 166. a. 1. Litt. §. 243. 256 c. and of sanae memoriae of Lands in Fée-simple it shall hold good and firme for ever albeit the values be un-equal but if it be of Lands intailed or if any of the Perceners be of non sanae memoriae it shall bind the parties themselves but not their issues unlesse it be equal Or if any be covert it shall bind the husband but not the Wife or her heires Co. ibid. 170. b. 4. 171. a. 4. Litt. §. 258. Or if any be within age it shall not bind the Infant c. Howbeit if the Feme covert after she becomes sole do assent unto the partition it shall bind her for ever and therefore in that Case the partition is not void but onely voidable There is the same Law of an Infant that assents after he attaines his full age c. â—emitter 2 If Tenant in tail make a Feoffment in Fée upon Condition Co. ibid. 202 b. 2. and dieth the issue in tail within age doth enter for the Condition broken he shall be first in as Tenant in Fée-simple as heire to his Father and consequently and instantly he shall be remitted but if the heire be of full age he shall not be remitted because he might have had his Formedon against the Feoffée and the entry for the Condition is his owne Act c. â—escent 3 A descent shall not take away the entry of an Infant Litt. §. 402. Co. ibid. 245. b. 4. unlesse his Mother being privement enseinte the descent was cast before his birth for then there was not cause of entry at the time of the descent cast c. â—escent 4 A dying seised shall not take away the entry of a Feme Covert Litt. §. 403. Co. ibid. 246. b. 1. unlesse the disseisin c. was made when she was sole and of full age and that she take Husband before she attaine her full age 5 If a descent be cast during the life of one that is non compos mentis albeit he himselfe cannot enter because he cannot disable himselfe yet his heire may well enter notwithstanding such descent Litt. §. 405. Co. ibid. 247. c. Descent Litt. §. 436. Co. ibid. 259. a. 3. 6 A descent shall not take away the entry of a man in prison Descent when the disseisin was made and the descent cast during the time of his imprisonment neither yet is he in that Case inforced by law to make continual claine by his servant or any other by his warrant or commandment For things done by deputy are seldome well done but every man will be willing to sée his owne businesse most effectually spéeded and performed An the reason why in this and the like Cases a man imprisoned shall not be bound is for that by the intendment of Law he is kept without intelligence of things abroad and also that he hath not liberty to go at large to make entry or claim or to séeke Counsel Litt. §. 438. c. So likewise if a Recovery by default be had against a man in prison he shall avoid it by writ of error For a man in prison by processe of Law ought to be kept in salva Co. ibid. 260. a. 3. arcta custodia and by the Law ought not to go out though it be with a keeper and with the leave and sufferance of the Goaler Howbeit imprisonment must be Custodia non poena for Carcer ad homines custodiendos non ad puniendos dari debet c. 7 A man out of the Realme in the Kings service Descent c. at the time of a disseisin Litt. §. 439. and a descent cast may enter at his returne because a man out of the Realme by intendment of Law cannot have knowledge of the disseisin c. Litt. §. 441. Co. ibid. 262. a. 2. 8 At the Common Law before the Statute of Non-claime 34 E. e. cap. 6. or that of making proclamations after a fine Non claime Fine 4 H. 7. cap. 24. one out of the Realme was not barred albeit he made not claime within a yeare and a day after a fine levied c. Co. ibid. 290. a. 4. 9 If a man have a judgement given against him for debt or damages or be bound in a recognisance and dieth his heire within age No execâ—â—â— against the heire under age or having two daughters and the one within age no execution shall be sued of the Lands by Elegit during the minority albeit the heire is not specially bound but charged as Terre-tenant So also against an heire within age no execution shall be sued upon a Statute Merchant or Staple nor upon an obligation or recognisance taken by force of the Statute of 32 H. 8. cap. 6. for it is excepted in the processe against the heire Neither if the heire within age endow his Mother shall execution be sued against her during his minority Litt. §. 594. 633. 10 At the Common Law If a Feme Inheritrix had a Baron Feme Inhâ—â—trix who being under age had aliened the Femes land in Fée and died In this Case the Feme or her heire might have entred which they could not have done before the Statute of 32 H. 28. cap. 8. if the Baron had béen of full age for by the Common Law the Feme was in that Case put to her Cui in vita and her heire to his Sur cui in vita Descent because such Feoffment of the Baron did work a dis-continuance c. Co. ibid. 337. a. 1. 11 If the Husband within age take a Wife a Feme Tenant in taile generall and the Husband make a gift in taile and dieth within age Feme Tenaâ—â— in taile in this Case the Wife may enter or the heire of the Baron in respect of the new reversion descended unto him may enter but if the heire enter presently thereupon his Estate vanisheth c. 12 If Husband and Wife be both within age Baron and Feme and they by déed intended joyne in a Feoffment reserving a Rent and the Husband dieth Co. ibid. 23. In this Case the Wife may enter or have a Dum fuit infra aetatem But if she were of full age she shall not have a Dum fuit infra aetatem for the non-age of her Husband Albeit they be but one person in Law 13 If two joyntenants being within age make enfeoffment in Fée Co. bid 337. b. 1. and one of the Infants dies and the other survives Infants jâ—ynt-tenants In this Case the surviving joynt-tenant may enter Because the right descends so that they may joyne in a Writ of right c. Likewise if there be two joynt-tenants the one of full age and the other within age and both make a Feoffment in Fée and he of full age dieth the Infant may enter or have a Dum
because there is not Quid pro quo which ought to be in every contract 46 The servant of A. was arrested in London upon Trespass Assumpsit and two Dier 272. 31. 10 El. who knew his Master bailed him afterwards A. promised them for their friendship to save them harmlesse from the damages and costs c. In this Case if they be afterwards charged an Action upon the Case lyeth not because there was no consideration for the bailing was on their own heads and was executed before the Assumpsit But if the Master had requested it before and assumed after ut supra it séemes to be otherwise As in considerarion that you have married my Daughter at my request I will give you c. This is a good consideration because the marriage ensued my request Hob. 6. 4. 18. 88. 47 Vide Hob. 4. Lané Malorie in Assumpsit Assumpsâ—â— the consideration was the delivery of two Statutes Staple to the Defendant Also Hob. 18. Woolastons Case in Assumpsit the consideration was a longer day And 88 Nichols Raynored the consideration was a promisse for promisse which must be at the same time otherwise they are nuda pacta Likewise 88 Brinsley and Partridge the consideration a former debt promised upon accompt Hob. 118. Shelton 48 Every Rate or modus decimand Tithe by prescription is a discharge of the natural title 109 De minimis non curat Lex Co. l. 5. 56. b. 3. Knights Case 1 In Office by commission under the Exchequer seale is enough to entitle the King to a Chattle Chequer seale Co. l. 6. 42. a. 2 S. Anth. Mildmays Case 2 The Law favours Estates taile in possession but gives no regard to Remainders or Reversions expectant upon an Estate in taile Rev. or Râ— upon an thâ— taile not â—luable for it is adjudged in Caples Case in the 1 Report that if Tenant in taile suffer a Common Recovery that shall not onely barre the Estate taile and the Remainder or Reversion but also a Rent which he in Remainder or Reversion hath granted So likewise was it adjudged in 12 El. betwixt Terling and Trafford in the Kings Bench that a Reversion or Remainder expectant upon an Estate taile shall not be assets to the heire in debt upon an obligation made by his Father Also Hil. 14 El. it was resolved by all the Iustices of C. Pl. in Copwoods Case that if there be tenant in taile the remainder to the right heirs of I.S. and Tenant in taile suffer a common recovery I.S. being then in life this shall barre the remainder albeit it were in abeyance and consideration of Law which the Law usually favours but de minimis non curat lex â—â—se for years â—â—eeble â—â—te 3 If Lessée for yeares pay a Rent seck Co. l. 6. 57. a. 4 Bredimans Ca. it is not seisin required in an Assise against the Tenant of the Frank-tenement in respect of the meanesse and imbecilitie of his Estate For at the Common Law he could prejudice nor draw into question the Estate of the Frank-tenement nor before the Statute of Glocester could be received albeit a recovery were had against the Tenant of the Frank-tenement by agréement neither could he falsifie a recovery before the Statute of 21 H. 8. and all this by reason of the Féeblenesse of his Estate 〈◊〉 attaint 4 In Trespas the Defendant pleads Villenage in the Plaintiffe and he was found frée and had 2 s. damages given him F. N. B. 107. l In this Case the Defendant shall not have an attaint for the finding of the Plaintiffe Frée because the damages are so small â—dition in 〈◊〉 broken 〈◊〉 5 There is a condition in Law annexed to the keep-ship of a Park Litt. §. 378. Co. Inst p. 1. 233. a. 4. viz. that if he do not well and lawfully kéep the Park it shall be lawfull for the Grantor and his heires to enter But this must be understood with a distinction For if the kéeper doth not attend on the Park one two or c. dayes this is no forfeiture of his Office but if in his default any Déere be killed whereby a damage comes to the Lord that is a forfeiture For non-user of it selfe without some special damages is no forfeiture of private Offices but non-user of publike offices which concern the administration of Iustice or the Common Wealth is of it selfe a cause of forfeiture â—â—covery not â—lable by 〈◊〉 outâ—â—y otherâ—â— 6 If a Recovery be had against a man in a praecipe by default when he is out of the Realme Co. ib. 260. b. 3 he shall not as it séemes avoid it by writ of Error for so a man might be infinitely delayed of his Frée-hold and Inheritance whereof the Law hath so great regard But out-lawry in a personal Action shall be avoided in that Case quia de minimis non curat Lex and otherwise he should be without remedy whereas in the other Case the Tenant may resort to his writ of higher nature or a quod ei deforceat for his remedy â—â—â—sion upâ—â— Estate 〈◊〉 of no vaâ—â—â— Law 7 If Lands be given to a man in taile Co. ib. 172. b. 3 who hath as much Land in Fée-simple and he die leading Issue two Daughters who make partition so as the Land in Fée-simple happens to the youngest Daughter Here if the youngest Daughter Alien the Fée-simple Land and die her heire shall enter for a pur part upon the entailed Lands And so it is also if the youngest Daughter had granted her part to another in taile For the Reversion expectant upon an Estate taile is of no account in Law because it may be cut off by tenant in tail â—â—covery 〈◊〉 or deâ—ging of â—â—â—aâ—y 8 If a man be seised of Lands in Fée and hath Issue two Daughters and make a Gift in taile to one of them and die seised of the Reversion in Fée which descends to both Sisters Co. Inst p. 1. 174. b. 1. and the Donée or her Issue is impleaded she shall not pray in ayde of the other Copercener either to recover per rata or to deraigne the Warranty paramount for that the Reversion is not of any estéeme in Law and the other Sister is a Stranger to the Estate Taile whereof partition neither was nor could be made Hob. 214. 9 The Earle of Somerset had obtained a grant of the licence of wines for yeares and tooke it in the name of Sir John Daccombe Wine Licence in trust for him Now the Question was whether or no by the Earles attainder of felony the lease was forfeited And by the opinion of all the Iudges it was forfeited and afterwards it was so resolved also in the Exchequer viz. in Cases of Chattels real and personal and things in Action of that sort 110 In Actions the Law yeeldeth favour when for the doing of them there is
esse for the other part for if there be Lord and Tenant of 40 acres of Land by fealty and 20 s. Rent if the Tenant make a Gift in tail or a lease for life or years of partel thereof to the Lord in this Case the Rent shall not be appoâ—tioned for any part but the Rent shall be suspended for the whole So it is also if the Lessor enter upon the Lessée for life or yeares into part and thereof disseise or put out the Lessée here the Rent is suspended in the whole and shall not be apportioned for any part and where outs Books speake of an apportionment in Case where the Lessor enters upon the Lessée in part they are to be understood where the Lessor enters lawfully as upon a surrender forfeiture or the like where the Rent is lawfully extinct in part yet by act in Law a Rent-service may be suspended in part and in esse for part as when the Guardian in Chivalry entreth into the land of his ward within age now is the Seigniory suspended but in this Case if the wife of the Tenant be endowed of a third part of the tenancy she shall pay to the Lord a third part of the tent so it is also where the Tenant gives a part of the tenancy to the father of the Lord in tail the father dieth and this descends to the Lord in this Case also by Act in Law the Seigniory is suspended in part and in esse for part And the same Law is of a Rent-charge which also cannot be apportioned but by Act in Law for if a man hath a rent-charge to him and his heirs issuing out of lands and he purchase part thereof Litt. § 222 224. in this Case the whole rent is extinct but if a man hath a Rent-charge and his father purchase part of the land out of which it issues in fée and die and that parcel descends to the son that hath the rent-charge in that Case the rent-charge shall be apportioned according to the value of the land 〈◊〉 charge 〈◊〉 because the part of land purchased by the father comes not to the son by his own Act but by descent and course of Law Co. ib. 149. b. 4 So also if the Tenant give the father of the grantée part of the land in tail and this descends to the grantée the rent shall be apportioned and so by act in Law a rent-charge may be suspended for one part and in esse for another or vice versa if the father vs grantée of a rent and the son purchase part of the land charged and the father dieth after whose death the rent descends to the son here also the rent shall be apportioned causa quà suprà â—â—nt-charge â—pationed 15 If the father within age purchase part of the Land charged Co. ib. 150. a. 2 and alieneth within age and dieth the son recovereth in a writ of dum flrit infra aetatem or entreth in this Case the Act of Law is mixt with the Act of the party and yet the rent shall be apportioned for after the recovery or entry the son hath the land by descent so it is also where the son recovereth part of the land upon an alienation by his father dum non fuit compos mentis for the cause afore-said 〈◊〉 16 A man seised of lands in fée takes wife Co. ibid. and makes a feofment in fée the feoffée grants a rent-charge of 10 l. out of the Land to the Feoffor and his wife and to the heltes of the husband the husband dieth the wife recovereth the moity for her dower by the custome the Rent-charge shall be apportioned and she shall distraine for five pound which is the moity of the rent and here albeit her owne act doth concurre with the Art in Law yet shall the Rent be apportioned â—d 〈…〉 Tenant 17 If there be Lord Mesne and Tenant Litt. §. 231. Co. ib. 152. and the Tenant holds of the Mesne by 5 s. rent and Mesne holds over of the Lord by 12 d. rent here the Mesne hath 4 s. rent in surplussage Now in this Case if the Lord purchase the tenancy The Mesne shall have the 4 s. yearely as rent secke and yet he shall distraine for it Litt. §. 232. Co. ib. 153. a. 1 vide infrà 40. for séeing the fealty is extinct the Law reserves the distresse to the Rent and the distresse in such Case shall by act in Law vs preserved Quia quando let aliquid a licui concedit concedere videtur id sicut quo res ipsa esse non potest And therefore if a man make a lease for life reserving a rent and bind himselfe in a Statute whereupon the Rent is extended and delivered to the Conusée here the Conusée shall distraine for the Rent because he cometh to it by course of law but if a rent-service be made a rent-seck by the grant of the lord the grantée shall not distrain for it for that the distresse in that case remaines with the fealty So likewise if there be Lord Mesne and Tenant and the mesnalty is a Mannor having divers frée-holders and the Lord purchase one of the Tenancies and there is a Rent by surplussage this rent although it be changed into another nature is parcel of the Mannor yet by purchase of part of the land the whole Rent is extinct albeit the Law did preserve it Co. ib. 163. b. 4 18 There is a diversity betwéen a discent Discent and purchase which is an Act of the Law and a purchase which is an Act of the party for if a man be seised of lands in Fée having Issue two Daughters and one of the Daughters is attainted of felony the Father dieth both Daughters being alive the one moity shall discend to the one daughter and the other moity shall escheate But if a man make a Lease for life the remainder to the right heires of A. being dead who left issue two Daughters whereof the one is attainted of felony In this Case some have said that the remainder is not good for the moity but void for the whole because both the Daughters should have béen as Littleton saith but one heire Co. ib. 164. b. 3 19 A Rent-charge is intire and against Common right Rent-chargâ— dividable and yet it may be divided betwéen coperceners and by Act in law the Tenant of the land is subject to several distresses and in that Case also partition may be made before seisin of the Rent Co. ib. 165. a. 4 20 If there be two Coperceners of lands with warranty Coperceners and they make partition in this case the warranty shall remaine because they are compellable by law to make partition it is otherwise of join-tenants for they were not by the Common law compellable to make partition Co. Ib. 166. b. 3 21 When partition is made betwixt Coperceners Partition by
Copercenerâ— the eldest sister hath the choice and this is called Enitia part of Eigne or Eldest but this priviledge is personal to her alone and shall not discend to her heire for then the next sister hath it because this partition is made personally by the Act of the parties but where the law doth give the eldest any priviledge withâ—ut her Act there that priviledge shall discend As if there be divers coperceners of an advowson and they cannot agrée to present the law doth give the first presentation to the eldest and this priviledge shall discend to her issue nay her assigne shall have it and so shall her husband that is Tenant by the courtesie have it also 22 A partition betwéen jointenants is not good without déed Partition bâ— parol 〈◊〉 although it be of lands or other things which may passe without déed albeit they be now compellable to make partition by the Stat. of 31 H. 8. â—0 31 H. 8. 32. because they must pursue one of those Acts as their case is by writ de partitione facienda Co. ib. 169. a. 1 and a partition betwéen jointenants without writ remaines at the common law as it was before those Statutes which could not be done by parol and therefore such partition is méerely by Act of the parties So it is also and for the same reason of tenants in common Dier 29. a. 194. 28 H. 8. But betwéen Coperceners partition may be made by parol without déed and that not onely of lands and other things that may passe by livery without déed but likewise of things that do lie in grant as rents Commons Advowsons and the like that cannot passe by grant without déed and that whether they be in one and the same County or in several Counties because in such partitions the act of the parties co-operateth with the act of law so likewise if two teannts in common make partition by parol execute the same in severalty by livery this is good and sufficient in Law because here also the act of the party worketh together with the Livery which is an Act of Law And therefore where Books say that Ioyntenants made partition without Déed it must be intended of Tenants in Common and executed by Livery But the chiefest Reason why Perceners have this Priviledge above Ioyntenants or Tenants in Common is because they come to their Estates by Discent which is an Act in Law but these by Purchase which is an Act of the parties And the Reason why Ioyntenants cannot make Partition by Parol with Livery as Tenants in Common may is because betwixt Tenants in Common there is onely privity in possession but betwixt Ioyntenants there is as well privity in Estate as privity in possession and therefore they cannot convey their Estates one to another without Déed as Tenants in Common may who have several Estates and claim under several Titles Rent c. may passe without Deed. 23 An Exchange of Lands in the same County may be without Déed Co. ib. 169. a. 3 Littl. §. 251. but a Rent granted for Egalty of the same Exchange cannot be without Déed yet if two Messuages discend to two Co-perceners the one worth 20 s. per annum and the other worth 10 s. the assignment of 5 s. per annum to be paid to the Co-percener that hath the Messuage of 10 s. per annum and her Heires is good by Parol without Déed And the Reason of this is because Co-perceners are in by Discent which is an Act of Law but the Exchange is the Act of the parties So it is also of Common of Estovers a Corodie Common of Pasture c. or of a Way granted by one Co-percener to the other All which and the like albeit they lie in Grant yet may they upon the Partition be granted without Déed causa qua suprà One Co-parâ—ner married 24 If there be thrée Co-perceners Co. ib. 169. b. 3. and one of them be married and for Egalty of partition the Husband and Wife grant a Rent to the other two out of the part of the Feme Covert this partition albeit it be not by Fine being equal shall charge the part of the Feme Covert for ever causa qua c. â—â—tition by â—â—ons and 〈◊〉 and Inâ—â—â—s 25 If two Co-perceners of Lands take Barons Co. ib. 171. a. 2 Litt. §. 256 257. and they and their Barons make Partition if the Partition was un-equal at the time it was made after the Barons death it may be reformed and it shall not bind the Co-percener that was wronged but if then the Partition was equal albeit it was not by Fine it shall bind them for ever because the Partition is made as well by Act of Law as by that of the parties the Barons and Femes being compellable by Law to make Partition And therefore if after such Partition made the Land become un-equal by any matter subsequent as by surrounding ill Husbandry or the like yet the Partition remaines good So likewise in Case of an Infant Co. ib. 171. a. 4 Littl §. 258. if the Partition be equal at the time of the Allotment it shall bind him for ever because he is compellable by Law to make Partition and he shall not have his age in a partitione facienda And though the Partion be un-equal and the Infant hath the Lesser part yet is not the Partition void but voidable by his entry for if he take the whole profits of the un-equal part for his full age the Partition is made good for ever And therefore Littleton Sect. 258. giveth him a Caveat that in that Case he take not the whole profits of his un-equal part neither shall a unequal part in the Chancery bind an Infant but a Partition made by the Writ of Partitione facienda by the Sheriff upon the Oath of 12 men and judgment thereupon given shall bind the Infant though his part be unequal Co. ib. 172. a. 2. for this is by Act of Law And generally whatsoever an Infant is bound to do by Law the same shall bind him albeit he doth it without suit of Law as if an Infant be Executor here upon payment of any Debt due to the Testator he may make an acquittance but in that Case a Release without payment before his age of 21 yeares is void Littl. 5. 260. Co. ib. 173. a. 3. 26 Partition amongst Coperceners maketh no Discontinuance Partition makes no discontinuance for if Lands be given to a man in tail who hath as much Land in Fée-simple and he hath issue two Daughteas and dies and the Daughters make partition so as all the Fée-simple Lands are allotted to the youngest Sister and the entailed Lands to the Eldest in this Case after the Death of the youngest Sister her issue after the alienation of Fée-simple Lands by her Mother may enter into the entailed Lands and hold them in property with her Aunt because
Villein to the stranger in respect of his confession So likewise in a writ of â—ativo habendo if the Plaintiffe as he ought offereth in his Count to prove the Villeinage by the Cousins and kindred of the Defendant and thereupon produceth the Vncles of the Defendant who upon examination confesses themselves to be Villeins to the Demandant this confession being entred of record doth so bind that albeit they were frée before yet they and the heirs of their bodies are by this confession bound and Villeins for ever c. â—â—â—chisâ—â— 6 If the Lord deliver seisin of Lands to his Villein Litt. §. 206 108. Co. ib. 138. a. 4 b. 3. to hold in fée fée taile for life or for yeares or make him any other certaine Estate or if the Lord sue against his Villein a praecipe quod reddat and recover or be non-suit or sue against his Villein any other personal action as debt account covenants trespass or the like These are maâ—â—missions because in the first Case the Lord may enter into the land of his Villein and in the other may imprison his Villein or take his goods at his pleasure without suit but by such suits the Lord maketh the Villein to be a person able to render the Lord in the first Case the land and in the other damages by course of Law In like manner if before indictmest the Lord bring an appeal of felony against his Villein whereupon the Villein is acquit this is an enfranchisement because upon the aquittal the shall recover damages against the Lord by the Statute of West 2. cap. 12. quia multi per malitiam c. In summe wheresoever the Lord giveth to the Villein a just cause of Action he is enfranchised and therefore if the Lord kill his Villein his son and heire shall have an appeale and thereby the heire shall be enfranchised because the offence of the Lord gave to the heire a just cause of Action against the Lord. 〈◊〉 in 〈◊〉 7 If there be two Coperceners Co. ib. 14â— b. 2 and the one bring a Rationabili paâ—â—e or a Nuper obijt against the other and the defâ—ndant claimes by purchase and disclaimes in the bloud here the Plaintife shall have a Mortdancester against her as a stranger for the whole Co. ib. 170. b. 4 8 When partition is made by the two Barons in the life time of their Femes Coperceners although such partition be unequal Unequal partition Feme covert Infant yet it is not void but voidable For if after the decease of the husband the wife entreth into the unequal part and agreeth thereunto this shall bind her and her heires for ever There is the same Law of an Infant when his part is unequal Co. ib. 171. a. 4 for by his entry at full age the partition is made good for ever Co. ib. 172. b. 3 173 a. 3. Litt. §. 260 261. 9 If a man having Issue two Daughters die seised of Fée-simple lands and also of as much in taile Coperceneâ— of fee-simplâ— and entâ—â—â— Lands and the eldest sister takes the entailed land for her proper part an the youngest sister enters into the Fée-simple lands and having issue aliens them to a stranger and dies In this Case the issue in taile may enter into the intailed lands and occupie them in Copercenery with her Aunt for it was the folly of the eldest sister to take the entailed lands for her part Litt. §. 286. Co. ib. 185. a. 3 10 If there be joint-tenants in fée Joint-tenanâ— Rent-charge Release and the one granteth a Rent charge out of his part and dieth in this Case the survivor shall hold the land discharged of the Rent because he claimeth the land by a title paramont viz. from the first feoffor and not by his companion but here if after the land is charged with the rent the other joint-tenant accept of a release from his ompanion that so charged the land in such case he shall hold the land charged with the rent for now by acceptance of such release he is not in by survivorship but from his companion Co. ib. 202. a. 2 11 The demand of a Rent or other sum to take advantage of a re-entry or condition broken ought by the law to be made where no other place or time is limited for the payment thereof upon the Land at the most notorious place there as at the fore-dore gate Demand of Rent c. upâ—â— a re-entry Condition or the like and at the last part of the day so as the money may be conveniently numbred before Sun set yet if upon the day of payment thereof the lessée or feoffée happen to méet the lessor or feoffor upon any part of the Land although it be not the most notorious place or at any time of the last day although it be not the last part as afore-said in such case if the Lessor or feossor refuse it In Wades Ca. Co. l. 5. 14. b. 2 he shall not take advantage of a re-entry or Condition broken as afore-said for by such refusal being his owne Act he hath barred himselfe of that advantage Co. ib. 202. b. 3 12 A. is bound to B. to pay 10 l. to C. A. tenders to C. Payment 〈◊〉 stranger and he refuseth in this Case the bond is forfeit for it shall be imputed the folly of A. to undertake to pay it to C. of whom he had no power to compel him to receive it Co. Inst p. 1. 209. a. 2 Co. l. 6. 31. a. 2 in Bothies Ca 13 If a man be bound to A. in an obligation with condition to enfeoffe B. who is a méere stranger before a day Obligation with Condition to enseâ— the obligor doth offer to enfeoffe B. and he refuseth the obligation is for the obligor hath taken upon him to enfeoffe him and his refusal cannot satisfie the condition because no feofment is made but if the feofment had béen by the condition to be made to the obligée or to any other for his benefit or behoofe in such Case a tender and refusal shall save the bond because he himselfe upon the matter is the cause wherefore the Condition could not be performed and therefore shall not give himself cause of action so also if A. be bound to B. with Condition that C. shall enfeoffe D. In this Case if C. tender and D. refuse the obligation is saved for the obligor himself undertaketh to do no act but that a stranger shall enfeoffe a stranger and in such case it shall be intended that the feofment should be made for the benefit of the obligée Litt. §. 340 Co. ib. 210. a. 4 14 If A. make feofment or be bound to B with condition to pay 20 l. No place â— payment at such a day no place being limited for the payment thereof here A. is bound to seeke B. if he be in
When a man conveys a thing to another by several words which will admit several acceptions Co. l. 2. 35. b. 3. 36. b. 4. Sit Rowland Heywards Case the interest of the thing granted passes presently and the grantée his heires or executors may make their election when and in what manner they will take it And therefore if a man seised of a Mannor part in demesne and part in lease demiseth bargaines and sels it to another for yeares the Lessée may make his election whether he will take it by demise at the Common Law or by bargaine and sale So also in Sir Rowlands Heywards Case in the second Report it was said if a man give two Acres of land habendum the one acre in fée and the other in taile and he alien both and hath Issue and dies in this Case the Issue may bring a Formedon in descender for which Acre he pleaseth for the election was not determined by the grantées death because the Estate past presently by the livery and the issue takes by discent â—e heires Eâ—tion 13 If a feofment be made to two and the heires of one of them Co. l. 2. 61. a. 3 Wiscots Case and he that hath the fée dies and after he Tenant for life dies in this Case the heire hath election to have a Mortdancester or a scire facias or a Formedon in remainder at his pleasure The Lords Eâ—ction 14 If there be Lord and Tenant by Knight-service Co. l. 2. 68. a. 4. in Tookers ca. and the Tenant die his heire within age here the Lord hath election either to seise the Ward or to distraine for the services and waive the Ward Per Popham Election of â—hings in â—gant 15 If Tenant in taile of a Rent Advowson Tithes Common Co. l. 3. 84. a. 4. in the Case of Fines or other such things which lie in grant grants them by déed in fée and dies the grant is not absolutely determined by his death but it is at the Election of the Issue to make the grant voidable or void at his pleasure for if he bring a Formedon for the Rent c. he makes the grant voidable but if he distraine for the rent or claime it upon the land he thereby determines his election and makes it void Co. l. 4. 81. a. 1 in Nokes Case 16 If a man seised of land in fée lets the same for life rendring Rent and besides binds himselfe and his heires to Warranty Election of Warranty here the expresse warranty takes not away the Warranty in Law for if he in reversion grant over his reversion and the Lessée attorn and after is impleaded it is at his Election whether he he will vouch the grantée by the warranty in Law or the Lessor by the expresse warranty Vide 20 E. 3. Tit. Counterplea de Garrantie 7. Co. l. 4. 82. a. 4. in Sir Andrew Corbets Case 17 If a man deviseth demiseth or limiteth by way of use land to another untill 800 l. be raised for the perferment of his daughters and dies Election of entry or actions and the heire or he in Reversion or Remainder enter upon him to whom the Land is devised demised or limited as afore-said and expulse him In this Case it is in the Election of the person so expulsed either to bring his Action and recover the meane profits which shall be accounted parcel of the summe or he may re-enter and hold the Land until he may levie the whole summe and the time in which he was so expulsed shall not be accounted parcel There is the same Law in other Cases viz. of Tenant by Elegit Statute Merchant Statute Staple Guardian who holdes over for the double value If he in the Reversion who is to have the Lands outs them they have such Election as afore-said either to hold over or to bring their action Co. l. 4. 93. a. 4 in Slades Case 18 For money due upon the sale of corne or the like Election of actions it is in the election of the Plaintiffe to bring an Action upon the Case or an Action of Debt 1 For the greater number of Presidents and Iudgment in the point 2 Every contract executory justly implies an Assumpsit 3 Recovery in an Action upon the Case barres in Debt 4 It is the more speedy Action for if the payment be at several days no debt lies till the last this lies upon the first breach 5 It is a formed action in the Register and may lie where Debt lies as appeares there Fol. 97 98 100 103. See Dier 20. 118. 28 H. 8. Gore Woddeys Case Co. ib 94. b. 4. in Slades Case 19 When the Register hath two writs for one of the same Case Election of action it is at the election of the party to take and use either the one or the other and it appeares by divers Cases in the Register that an action upon the Case will lie albeit the Plaintiffe may have for the same thing another formed Action in the Register F. N. B. 94. g. Register 103. b. So if a man hath a Mannor within an Honor and hath a Léet within his Mannor for his owne Tenants if he or his Tenants are distrained by the Lord of the Honor to come to the Léet of the Honor he that is so distrained may have a general writ of Trespas or a special writ upon his Case So if an Officer take toll of him who ought to be quit of toll he shall have a general writ of Trespas or an action upon his Case as appeares by Fizt ibid. If a Prior or other Prelate be riding upon his journey and one distraines the horse upon which he rides when he might distraine other of his goods in this Case he may have a general action of Trespass or an action upon his Case as appeares by the Register fol. 100. F. N. B. 93. b. So if a Sheriffe suffer one in execution upon a Statute Marchant to escape the Conusée may have an Action of debt or an action upon the Case as appeares by the Register 98. b. F. N. B. 93 B. C. So if a man â—ust the Executors of his Lessée for yeares from their terme they may have a special writ upon their Case as appeares F. N. B. 92. g. Register 97. and yet they may also have an Ejectione firmae or Trespass for in all Cases when the Register hath two writs for one and the same Case it is at the election of the party to take either the one or the other 〈◊〉 of 〈◊〉 for 〈◊〉 20 Where a Prior is the Kings debtor Co. l. 5. p. 1. 16. a. 2. in the K. Ecclesiastical Law and ought to have tithes of another spiritual person he may choose either to sue for subtraction of his tithes in the Ecclesiastical Court or in the Exchequer and yet the persons and matter also was Ecclesiastical
appendant in twenty acres of land enfeoff B. of parcell thereof this Common shall be apportioned and B. shal have Common pro rata and if he be invested shall make a speciall prescription for his Common It is otherwise of Common appurtenant which is against common right for by purchase of part of the land in which c. the whole common is extinct Co. l. 6. 58. a 4 Bredimans case Co. ibid. 58. b. 3. 7. Lessee for years pays a rent seck Seisin of Reâ—seck by the Lessee for years not good this is not such a seisin as is required in an Assise against the tenant of the frank tenement and one of the reasons alledged for this resolution is because a rent seck is against common right and therefore shall not be favoured in Law but the seisin ought to be given by the tenant of the frank tenement or seisin ought to be made or given by all the ter-tenants that have interest in the land out of which c. because they are against common right and therefore not favoured in Law Co. l. 8. 105. b. 3. in John Talbots case 8. In most cases where the Lord purchaseth part of the tenancy especially if the tenant hold by an Intire service the whole service is extinct Homage and fealty remaiâ— howbeit although the Lord purchase parcell of the tenancy Homage and Fealty shall remaine for the residue because they are due of common right Co. l. 8. 118. a. 2. in Doctor Bonhams case 9. When an Act of Parliament is against common right and reason Acts against common rigâ— void or repugnant or impossible to be performed the common Law doth controll it and adjudgeth such an Act voyd And therefore in 8 E. 3. 30. Thomas Tregors case upon the Statute of Westm 2. c. 38. and Artic super Car. cap. 9. Herle saith Some Statutes are made against Law and right which those that made them perceiving would not put them in execution The Statute of Westm 2. cap. 21. gives a Writ of Cessavit heredi petenti super heredem tenentem super eos quibus alienatum fuerit hujusmodi tenementum And yet where in 33 E. 3. tit Cessavit 42. there were two Coparceners Lords and Tenant by fealty and certaine rent the one Coparcener had issue and dyes the other and the Neece could not joyne in a Cessavit because the heire could not have a Cessavit for the Lessee in the time of her Ancestor F. N. B. 209. f. and with this accords Plowd Com. 110. and the reason hereof is because in Cessavit the tenant before judgment may render the arrerages and damages c. and retaine his Land and this he cannot do when the heire brings Cessavit for the Lessee in the time of his Ancestor for the arrerages occurred in the life of his Ancestor belong not to him and thereupon because the sayd Act was against common right and reason the common Law as to that point adjudged it voyd Vide plus ibidem Tâ—â—hes due of common right 10. Quota pars viz. decima pars which we call dismes or tythes is an Ecclesiasticall Inheritance collaterall to the estate of the Land Co. l. 11. 13. a. 3. in Bridle and Nappers case which cannot be either extinct or suspended by unity of possession because they are due of common right And therefore if a Prior having a Parsonage impropriate had infeoffed a Lay-man of part of the Glebe yet he should have had tythes against his owne feoffment as it is held in 42 E. 3. 13. a. Vide Hob. 107. The Bishop of Carliles case Certainty in a Leet 11. The Lord of a Leet cannot justifie to distraine for the certainty of the Leet because it is collaterall and against common right Co. l. 11. 44. 2. 45. 2. in Rich. Godfreys case and for the private profit of the Lord of the Leet which the Lord cannot have without prescription and therefore as he ought to prescribe in the principall so ought he to prescribe in the distresse Howbeit although for an amerciament in a Court Baron the Lord cannot distraine without prescription Vide 44 E. 3. 13. yet for a Fine and all amerciaments in a Court Leet distresse is incident of common right And therefore if the certainty be not duely payd the Deciver or Capitall pledge that collects it may first be amerced and then distrained for his negligence Tenant at wil. 12. If Lessor upon a lease at will reserve an annuall rent Litt. S. 72. Co. Inst pars 1. 57. b. he may distraine for the rent arreare or have an action of debt for it at his election because power of distresse is in that case given him of common right and so is also the action â—galty de partition 13. Where Coparceners make partition by Parol Litt. S. 252. Co. ibid. 169. b. and for egalty of partition one of them is to have a rent out of the land in this case shee may distraine for the rent arreare of common right Assize 14. In an Assise of Novel disseisin for Land Dyer 84. a. 81 7. E. 6. or since the Statute of 32 H. 8. 7. for Tithes the ter-tenant need not be named in the Count but onely the disseisor It is otherwise in an Assise of Rent-charge or seck because they are things against common right 145. And therefore it suffereth things against principles of Law rather then the party should be without remedy A speciall case of an entail 1. John de Mandevile by his Wife Roberge had issue Robert and Mawde Michael de Morvile gave certaine Lands to Roberge Co. Inst pars 1. 26. b. 2. and to the heires of John Mandevile her late Husband on her body begotten and it was adjudged that Roberge had an estate but for life and the fee-taile vested in Robert heires of the body of his Father being a good name of purchase and that when he dyed without issue Mawde the Daughter was tenant in taile as heire of the body of her Father per formam doni and the Formedon which shee brought supposed Quod post mortem prefatae Robergiae Roberti filii heredis ipsius Johannis Mandevile heredis ipsius Johannis de prefata Robergia per prefatum Johannem procreat prefatae matildae filiae predict Johannis de prefato de Robergia per prefatum Johannem procreatae sorori heredi predicti Roberti descendere debet performam donationis predictae And yet in truth the land did not descend unto her from Robert but because shee could have no other Writ it was adjudged to be good In which case it is to be observed that albeit Robert being heire tooke an estate by purchase and the Daughter was no heire of his body at the time of the gift yet shee recovered the land per formam doni by the name of Heire of the body of her Father which indeed her brother was
Action Also after the escape if the Capias ad satisfaciendum be not returned and filed it may be renued against the Prisoner Co. l. 3. 64. a. 4. Pennants case 22. A man leases his Land Acceptance of rent no confirmation upon condition that the Lessee shall not assigne any part thereof the condition is broken and the Lessor before notice of the assignment accepts the rent due after such assignment In this case the condition being collaterall the breaking thereof may be so secretly contrived that it is not possible for the Lessor to come to the knowledge thereof and therefore notice in this case is materiall and issuable for otherwise the Lessee should take advantage of his owne fraud It is otherwise if a Lease be made with condition of re-entry upon non-payment of the rent for in such case both parties may take notice thereof by the Indenture and therefore by acceptance of the rent afterwards the Lessor dispenseth with the Condition and confirmes the Lease Co. l 3. 76. b. 2. Fermors case 23. A. possessed of divers parcells of Land within the Mannor of S. for years at will and by copy and also of others there in fee Fine no barâ— to the Lord. demiseth the whole to B. for life and thereupon levies a Fine to B. c. of so many acres as amount to the whole Land continues possession and payes the rents to the Lord In this case albeit five yeares passe yet the Lord is not barred for it is unreasonable to give the Lessee benefit in this case of the Lessors non-claime when the tort and covin of the Lessee is the cause of his non-claime for a man shall not take advantage of his owne covin or wrong Co. l. 4. 82. a. 4. Sir Anthony Corbeâ—s case 24. A. deviseth his Land to B. till eight hundred pounds be raised for the preferment of his Daughters and dyes Devise to raise money C. his heire conceales the Will enters and dyes In this case B. shall have allowance for the time that the Will was concealed and shall hold the Land so much the longer according to the time that the Will was so concealed untill the eight hundred pounds may be raised for it is against reason that the heire should enter upon the Land so much the sooner because his concealment of the will was a wrong and then he should take advantage of his own wrong Waste in a Colemine 25. A. demiseth a Close to B. wherein there is a Colemine un-opened Co. l. 5. 12. b. 3. in Sanders case B. opens the Mine and assignes his terme to C. except all Mines C. digs Coles out of the Mine and A. brings an Action of waste against C. in this A. shall recover locum vastarum and the exception shall not excuse it for the opening of the Mine by B. was a tort and that being committed if B. should excuse or avoid it by the exception he should thereby take advantage of his own wrong 26. If A. grants to B. one hundred cords of wood to be cut downe and taken by the assignment of A. If A. in convenient time after request by B. do not assigne them B. may take them himselfe without any assignment Co. l. 24. b. 4. in Sir Thomas Palmers case for the Grantor in such case by his own act or default shall not derogate from his grant nor take advantage by such his neglect of non-assignment there is the same Law of Estovers c. to be assigned by the Bayliff of a Mannor c. Executor de son tort 27. An Executor of his own wrong shall not retaine goods in his own hands to satisfie his proper debt Co. l. 5. 30. b. 3. in Coulters case for then he should take advantage of his own wrong which the Law will not permit Age not allowed 28. Regularly in all reall actions at the Common Law Co. l. 6. 4. b. 3. in Markals case if the Tenant be within age and in by descent he shall have his age Howbeit if the Action be founded upon his owne wrong as in Cessavit upon his cesser in such case he shall not have his age For then he should take advantage of his own wrong After Judgement the bond not valid 29. A. hath Iudgement in an Action of debt upon an Obligation Co. l. 6 45. b. 2. in Higgens case the Defendant brings a Writ of Error and hanging the Writ of Error the Plaintiff brings a new Action of debt upon the same Obligation but it was adjudged he could not for untill the Iudgment be reversed by Error the Obligation remaines quasht and if there be Error in the proceeding that is the Plaintiffs fault and he shall not take advantage of his own tort or default Release to a Joynt-tenant 30. A. and B. are Ioynt-tenants for life Co. l. 6. 78. b. The Lord of Abergavenies case and Iudgement is had against A. in debt who releaseth to B. and B. dyes In this case albeit the terme is expired so as the Reversioner may enter yet the Land shall stand charged with the Iudgement during the life of A. for otherwise A. should take advantage of his own Act and thereby avoid the debt and Iudgment of the Creditor who is a stranger to the release Action upon the case 31. A. recovers against B. in the Common Pleas and dyes Co. l. 7. 4. b. 2. in Bulwers case C. upon the Iudgment in the name of H. outlawes B. in the Hustings of London die lunae proximum post festum Simonis Judae and thereupon P. is taken by a Capias Utlagatum in Norfolke and there imprisoned whereupon B. brings an Action upon the case against C. Quia maliciose deceptive machinatus est c. And in this case it was objected that the Capias Utlagatum was erronious because the Outlawry was therein recited to be proximum ante festum c. but that exception was not allowed because the error in the Writ which the Defendant C. had tortiously pursued shall give no advantage to himselfe but in as much as B. the Plaintiff was imprisoned and molested thereby he had thereupon good cause of Action The heire not estopt 32. Where Lands were conveyed to Baron and Feme Co. l. 8. 53. b. 3. in Sims his case 18. E. 3. fo 9. and to the heires of the Baron and the Baron gives them in tail the Baron dyes the Feme recovers the Land against the Donee by a writ of Cui in vita supposing that she had the Land to her and her heires in fee the Feme after the Recovery enfeoffs another and dyes the Donee in tail dyes without issue the issue of Baron and Feme brings a Formedon in Reverter against the Feoffee of the Feme And in this case albeit the issue was heire to the Feme and thereby estopt by the Recovery in the Cui in
with his attornement to the said Duke and after the Duke grants it over to E. 6. in fee by deed enrolled and doth not alleadge expressely that Sir Richard Sackvile granted the reversion by deed but generally quod concessit reversionem hadendam in feodo ad quam quidem concessionem idem querens se inde Atturnavit And in this case the Count per Dyer was good without saying per cartam and without producing it into Court because the Farmer was a stranger to the deed or grant and had not the power of it for that it belonged not to him neither did he convey any title to him under it T. 17. H. 6. Rot. 121. So in an Assise the Plaint was made of Land and rent and the tenant conveyed them unto him by the grant of A. in taile the remainder to the King in fee and prayed Aide of the King without shewing the deed and without saying concessit tenementum per cartam habuit Auxilium c. Feomedon 28. In a Formedon in Reverter the doner need not shew the pedigrees of the issues of the donee nor who was last seised Dyer 216. 56 4. Eliz. because he is a stranger to the pedigree and by intendment cannot come to the knowledge of it It is otherwise in a Formedon in discender Quaete in Remainder Appeal 29. The Lessee of a Parson brings an Ejectione firmae Dyer 240. 46. 7. Eliz. the defendant pleads that the parson was deprived the Plaintiff saith that the parson hath appealed to the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury in Curia sua prerogativa de Arcubus and because the words of the Statute of 24. H. 8. 12. are the appeal that shall be to the Arch-bishop of the Province or c. without limiting any Court in certaine the Defendant demurred And these words to the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury were held sufficient because of substance c. And in this argument although it appeared by the Civilians that the Arches were not the Praerogative Court yet because the Defendant did not shew it but demurred generally the Temporall Iudges were not bound to take notice of their Iurisdictions Formedon in Rem 30. In a Formedon in Remainder brought upon a Remainder in use after the Statute of 27. H. 8. It was held by the Justices Dyer 277. 58. 10. Eliz. that the demandant need not shew the deed of the remainder 1. because in this case the remainder might be created without deed 2. for that the deed did appertaine to the feoffees and not to Cestuy que use and therefore might not be in his power to produce Hob. 51. Holmes and Twist 30. A. being possest of 10 tunne of woad sels to B. one tunne thereof Assumpsit for which B. promiseth to pay him according to such rate as he should sell the rest for A. sels the rest after the rate of 23 l. the tunne In this case A. shall not recover the 23 l. of B. before he hath acquainted B. at what rate he sold the rest because the price is a secret thing betwixt A. and his other chapmen whereof B. is not bound to take notice as it was adjudged upon a Writ of Error in the Exchequer Chamber T. 12. Jac. Rot 1758. 152. Nor to do that which were in vain for him to do Litt. S. 103. Co. Inst pars 1. 79. a. 2. 1. If an heire female be married within the age of 14. in the life of her ancester and the ancester die she being still within the age of 14 Tender of marriage the Lord shall have but the ward of the land untill her age of 14 and shall not within the two years after tender her marriage according to the Statute of Westminster 1. cap. 22. for that is without the case of the Statute it being in vaine for the Lord to tender her marriage when she is already married Natura non facit vacuum nec Lex supervacuum Litt. S. 179. Co. ibid. 119. a. 3. 2. If a villaine purchase a reversion Claime by Lord. the Lord after attornment ought to claime it upon the land to entitle himselfe thereunto so it is also of a rent common or other inheritance issuing out of land but if a villaine purchase the seigniory or a rent common or c. issuing out of the land of the Lord himselfe it is said that the seigniory rent common c. are extinguished in the Lords possession without any claime for it is needlesse to claime them upon the Land when he himselfe is possessed of the land out of which they are issuing Co. ibid. 123. b. 3. 3. A villain shall not have an appeal of Robberie against his Lord Appeal Lord and Villain for that the Lord may lawfully take the goods of the villain as his owne and then it would be in vaine to bring an appeale against the Lord for taking his owne goods Litt. S. 194. Co. ibid. 126. b. 3. 4. If the Lord mayhem his villain Appeale of mayhem he may be indicted for it at the suite of the King and thereupon make Fine for his offence but the villain shall not have an appeale of mayhem against his Lord because in such appeale he shall recover onely damages which the Lord after execution may take againe and so the Iudgement would become inutile and illusorie and sapiens incipit a fine And the law never giveth an action where the end of it can bring no profit or benefit to the Plaintiff Litt. S. 273 Co. ibid. 178. b. 4. 5. A man seised of 30 acres of land of equall value Hochpot and having two Daughters gives 15 acres with one of them in frankmarriage and dies and the other 15 acres descends to the other Daughter In this case there shall be no casting into hochpot because the lands were of equall value at the time of the partition for it were in vaine to put them into hochpot being equall no alteration since by the act of God or otherwise whereby the lands are bettered or impared being to be had in consideration Co. ibid. 19â— b. 1. 6. If there be two tenants in common of a rent as money graine Tenants in common or any severable thing and they be disseised thereof they shall bring severall assises for the recoverie thereof because they have it by severall titles Howbeit if the rent be a Hawke horse or any other intire thing which cannot be severed they shall joyne in an assise for it because the Law will never enforce a man to demand that which he cannot recover and a man cannot recover the moitie of an Hawke horse or the like Lex neminem cogit ad vane seu inutilia Co. ibid. 218. a. 4. 7. If I grant a rent charge in fee out of my land upon condition Claime not needfull there if the condition be broken the rent shall be extinct in my hand because I that am in
out when he will An Earledome to Daughters 15. If an Earle hath his dignity to him and his Heirs and dyeth Co. ibid. 165. a. 3. having issue one onely Daughter the Dignity shall descend to the Daughter and to her posterity as well as any other Inheritance as it fell out in Sampson Leonards case who marryed Margaret the onely Sister and Heire of Gregory Fines Lord Dacre of the South and in the case of William Lord Rosse for in such case there can be no uncertainty when there is but one Daughter or Sister Howbeit where there are more Daughters then one the eldest shall not have the Dignity and power of the Earle viz. to be a Countesse but in such case the King who is the Soveraigne of honor and dignity may for the uncertainty confer the dignity upon which of the Daughters he please Howbeit the Lands shall be divided betwixt them as amongst Parceners for they are divisible and certaine Co. ibid. 211. a. 2. 220. a. 4. 16. If a man be bound to pay twenty pounds at any time during his life at a place certaine Uncertain day of payment the Obligor cannot tender the money at the place when he will for then the Obligee should be bound to perpetuall attendance and therefore the Obligor in respect of the uncertainty of the time must give the Obligee notice that on such a day at the place limited he will pay the money and then the Obligee must attend there to receive it for if the Obligor then and there tender the money he shall thereby save the penalty of the Bond for ever So likewise if a man make a Feoffment in fee upon Condition that if the Feoffor at any time during his life pay to the Feoffee twenty pounds at such a place certaine that then c. In this case also the Feoffor must give notice to the Feoffee when he will pay it for without such notice as aforesaid the tender will not be sufficient Also if A. be bound to B. with Condition that C. shall enfeoff D. on such a day C. must give noâ—â—ce thereof to D. and request him to be on the Land at the day to receive â—he Feoffment and in such case he is bound to seek D. and to give him notice In all which cases it is to be observed that what the contract of the parties leaves uncertain the Law to prevent contention reduceth to a certainty And therefore in such cases Littletons advise is wholesome councell viz. Not onely to limit a certaine place and day Litt. S. 342. Co. ibid. 212. a. 3. but likewise to set down in the Condition a certaine time of the day as betwixt the houres of two and four or the like And indeed it is good in Conveyances to set downe every thing in certainty and particularity for certainty is the mother of quietnesse and repose and uncertainty the cause of variance and contention And therefore for the obtaining of the one and avoyding of the other the best meane is in all assurances to take councell of learned and well experienced men and not to trust onely without advice to a Presiden for as the Rule is concerning the state of a mans body Nullum medicamentum is idem omnibus so in the state and assurance of a mans Lands Nullum exemplum est idem omnibus Co. ibid. 218. a 2. 17. A Lease is made to a man and a woman for their lives upon Condition that which of them two shall marry first Lease on Condition to marry that one shall have the fee they intermarry In this case neither of them shall have fee for the uncertainty Co. ibid. 227. a. 1. 18. If the Iury give a Verdict of the whole Issue and of more Insufficient Verdict c. that is surplusage and shall not stay Iudgement for utile per inutile non vitiatur and necessary incidents required by Law the Iury may find Howbeit a Verdict finding matter uncertainly or ambiguously is insufficient and no Iudgement shall be given thereupon as if an Erecutor plead plene administravit and Issue is joyned thereupon and the Iury finde that the Defendant hath goods in his hands to be administred but find not to what value this is uncertaine and therefore insufficient so a Verdict that finds part of the Issue and nothing for the residue is insufficient for the whole because they have not tryed the whole Issue whereby they are charged As if an Information of Intrusion be brought against one for intruding into a Messuage and one hundred Acres of land upon the generall Issue the Iury find against the Defendant for the Land but say nothing for the House this is insufficient for the whole and so it was twice adjudged viz. H. 25 Eliz. in a Writ of Error in the Exchequer Chamber inter Brace and the Queene and M. 28 29 Eliz. inter Gomersall and Gomersall in account in Banco Regis Co. Inst pars 1. 271. b. 4. 19 A Feoffee to the use of A. and his Heirs before the Statute of 27 H. 8. for money bargaineth and selleth the Land to C. and his Heirs Uncertainty or an use who hath no notice of the former use yet no use passeth by this bargain and sale for there cannot be two uses in esse of one and the same Land and seeing there is no transmutation of Possession by the Ter-tenant the former use can neither be extinct nor altered And if there could be two uses of one and the same Land then could not the Statute of Uses execute either of them for the uncertainty Detinue 20. A Writ of Detinue lyeth for goods delivered or found Co. ibid. 286. b. 2. when the Plaintiff can declare in certain what they are but it lyeth not for money out of a Bag or Chest or for Corne out of a Sack or the like because these cannot be distinguished from other money or Corne So likewise an Action of Detinue lyeth for Charters which concerne the Inheritance of Land if he know them in certaine and what Land they concerne or if they be in a Bag sealed or Chest locked albeit he know not the certainty of them but the Writings or at least the Bag or Chest he must know in certaine otherwise that Action lyeth not And in case of a Bag or Chest it is good to declare if he can of one Writing in certaine for then the Defendant cannot wage his Law which otherwise he may Plaas double and multiplied 21. In dilatory Pleas there may be duplicity and multiplicity of distinct matter for in their time and place a man may use divers of them Co. ibid. 304. a. 3. but in Pleas perpetuall and peremptory there ought not to be duplicity or multiplicity of distinct matter to one and the same thing whereunto severall answers admitting each of them to be good are required for that is not allowable in Law for the
own Tender but if he that gaged them tendred the money before the stealing and the other refused to deliver them then for this negligence and default in him he shall be charged with them Default in reâ—â—â—ictions 5 In real actions where Voucher lyeth Co. ibid. 101. b. 4. if the Sheriff return that the Vouchée is summoned and he make default then a Magnum Cape ad valentiam is awarded when if he make default again then Iudgement is to be given against the tenant Also if the vouchee do appear and after make default then a Parvum Cape ad valentiam is awarded and if he thereupon make default again then judgment is to be given as before Villein 〈◊〉 Lords 〈◊〉 6 If a Villein purchase land Co. ibid. 118. a. 4. b. 1 2. Littl. §. 177. and alien the land to another before the Lord enter In that case the Lord cannot enter for it shall be adjudged his folly that he entred not when the land was in the Villeins hand So it is likewise if a freeman hath issue and afterwards by confession becometh bond and purchase lands in fee and before the Lord enter he dieth seised and the land descends to his issue which is free in this case also the Lord shall not enter The like Law it is if the land so purchased by the Villein escheat to the Lord of the fee before any entry made by the Lord of the Villein as if the Villein dye without heir or be convict or outlawed for felony or if a recovery be had against the Villein in a Cessavit or the like in all such cases it will be imputed to the folly of the Lord of the Villein that he entred not in time when he might Also if a Villein be disseised before the Lord doth enter the Lord may enter into the land in the name of the Villein and thereby goin the Inheritance of the land but if there be a descent cast so as the entry of the Villein is taken away then the Villein must recontinue the estate of the land by judgement and execution before the Lord of the Villein can enter So if the Villein purchase lands in tayl and alien before the Lord enter the Lords entry is taken away causa qua supra but if the Villein dye and his issue recover the land entayled in a Formedon then the Lord may enter The like law is also of Seigniories Co. ibid. 2. Advowsons Reversions Remainders Rents Commons certain and such like certain Inheritances And all the reason of these â—â—â—es is besides the Lords folly and negligence because the Lord before his entry hath no interest but only a bare possibility Howbeit it is otherwise in the Kings case after office found because nullum tempus occurrit Regi Co. ibid. 118. a. 4. b. 3. Littl. §. 177. 7 If a Villein purchase goods or chattels Villein The Lords seisure of Goods and sell or give them away before the Lord seise them his title to the goods is gone for the Law imputeth it to his folly and negligence as before of lands c. for a bare claim of the goods of the Villein is not sufficient in Law but he must seise some part in the name of all the residue or that the goods be within the view of the Lord for the claim and view amount to a seisure as the claim of a Ward being present by word is a sufficient seisure albeit the Guardian layeth no hands of him And here under the name of goods and chattels are comprehended not only personal goods as an Horse a Cow Housholdstuff and the like but also chattels real as Wardships Leases for years Interests by Statute staple Statute merchant Elegit or the like and the gifts aforesaid do not only extend to gifts in deed but likewise to gifts in Law And therefore if a Wife hath goods and taketh Baron upon this gift in Law by force of the marriage the land is barred So likewise if a Villein having goods make his executors and dye by this gift in Law the Lord is barred for his folly and neglect Co. ibid. 131. a. 4. 8 In an action where a Protection lyeth â—â—â—tectiâ—n if after it is allowed the party tarrieth in the Country without going to the service for which he was relieved above a convenient time after the Protection had or otherwise withdraw himself from the service upon Information thereof to the Lord Chancellor he shall repeal the Protection in that case by an Innotescimus See the Statute of 13 R. 2. 16. Littl. §. 261. Co. ibid. 173. a. 4. 9 If lands be given to a man in tayl Partition who hath as much Feesimple lands and hath issue two daughters and dye and the daughters make partition and the feesimple lands are assigned to the youngest daughter for her purparty and the entailed lands to the elder and the youngest daughter aliens the feesimple lands and having issue dies In this case the issue of the youngest daughter may enter into the moiety of the entailed lands notwithstanding such partition for it will be imputed to the folly of the eldest daughter that she agreed to such a Partition whereas she might have had upon the Partition the moyety of the one and also of the other because in a writ of Partition she was not compellable to take the whole estate in tayl but might have challenged moities in each as aforesaid and that ex provisione legis But when she will not submit her self to the policy and provision of Law but betake her self to her own policy and provision there the Law will not ayd her So likewise if a man be seised of three Manors in fee of equal value Dower and taketh wife and chargeth one of the Manors with a rent-charge and dieth the wife may by the provision of the Law take a third part of all the Manors and hold them discharged but if she will in folly accept the entire Manor charged she shall hold it charged with the rent Mortgage 10 If the Mortgageor tender the money at the day to the Mortgagée and the Mortgagée refuse it and the Mortgageor thereupon enter Littl. §. 335. Co. ibid. 207. the Mortgagée is without remedy at the Common Law for it will be imputed to his folly that he refused it when lawfull tender thereof was made unto him Vide Max. 80. case 24. Bastard Mulâ—er 11 If there be a Bastard eygne and Mulier puisne Littl. §. 399. 401. Co. ibid. 244. and after the fathers death the Bastard enter and peaceably enjoys the land without entry of the Mulier all his life and having issue dieth seised In this case the Mulier is barred for ever for it is imputed to the folly and negligence of the Mulier that he entred not during the life of the Bastard and albeit the Mulier were under age or covert baron at the time of
awarded he comes too late after for non constat Curiae Alien that he is an Alien Spinolaes case 174 Vigilantibus non Dormientibus Leges subveniunt Co. Inst pars 1. 139. b. 1. 1 At the Common Law upon every continuance or day given over before judgement the plaintif might have been nonsuted Non-sute and therefore before the Statute of 2 H. 4. cap. 7. after verdict given if the Court gave a day to be advised at that day the plaintif was demandable and might have been Nonsuted for vigilantibus non dormientibus c. Co. l. 4. 82. b. 3. in Sir Andrew Corbets case 2 A. deviseth land to B. till 800 l. be raised for the preferment of his daughters dies C. the heir of A conceals the will enters dieth Devise Notice In this case B. shall have alloâ—ance for the time that the will was concealed but albeit B. had not notice of the will yet if a stranger had occupied the land the devisee ought to take notice of the devise at his peril for vigilantibus non dormientibus c. And in such case none is bound to give him notice Co. l. 5. 76. a. The Earl of Pembrooks case 3 Where the defendant shewes a deed to the Court Deed entred the plaintif may pray the same Term that it may be entred in haec verba And so he may demurr or take issue at his pleasure But if he neglect to pray it that term he shall never have it so entred afterwards Co. l. 7. 27. b. Sir Hugh Portmans case 4 In a Quare impedit if the plaintif be nonsute after appearance Quare Impedit or discontinue the sute that is peremptory and the defendant becomes Actor and shall immediately have a writ to the Bishop c. Co. l 6. 8. b. 1 in Ferrers case 5 At the Common Law before the Statute of Westm 2. cap. 4. Recovery by default If any had suffered a Recovery in any real action by default if he were lawfully summoned and there were no error in the proceeding he could not have the case of an Infant only excepted any remedy but by writ of right And therefore the writ of Quod ei deforceat was by that Statute given to tenant in tayl by the Curtesie in Dower and for life after recovery had against them by default F.N.B. 20 g. 6 In a writ of Error when the record is come into the Court Error if the plaintif all that Term do not assign his errors and albeit he then assign the errors yet if he do not then also sue out a Scire facias ad audiendum errores against the defendant returnable the same term or the next term following all the matter is discontinued Dyer 232. 9. 7 Eliz. 7 An Infant at full age brings an Audita querela in Chancery to avoid a recognisance in the nature of a Statute staple by him made within age Infant but because his age was to be tried by the inspection of the Court it was adjudged that it did not lie so also it had béen if he had died within age for in such case he should have brought the Audita querela before his full age Dyer 241. 48 7 Eliz. 8 A Quare Impedit issued against the Archbishop of Canterbury Quare Imp. the Bishop of Lincoln and the Incumbent who made default to the great distress whereupon the plaintif made title that he might have a writ to the Bishop and a writ was awarded to enquire de damnis de plenitudine ad cujus praesentationem quantum temporis elabitur a vacatione et quantum Ecclesia valet per annum all which points were returned by inquisition and accordingly Iudgement was given that the plaintif should recover the presentment and should have a writ to the Bishop of Lincoln and damages to the value of the Church by half a year and the defendants in misericordia Error 9 If a writ of Error be delivered to the Chief Iustice of the C. B. or the Clerk of the Treasorie there this is a Supersedeas in Law Dyer 244. 63. 8 Eliz. and a stop to award execution Howbeit if the plaintif do not crave the removal of the record before the return of the writ of Error the Iustices may then award execution Vide 6 H. 7. 16. 175 It favoureth speeding of mens Causes And therefore Protections 1 In antient time Co. Inst pars 1. 130. b. 4. when Noblemen and others purchased by Letters Patents from the King protections either Profecturae or Moraturae to go or remain beyond the Grecian sea or elsewhere they were also by other Letters Patents to purchase licence to make their general Attorneys in all Courts so as no actions or sutes should be thereby delayed which Britton commends to be bien et sagement fait fol. 282. Protection 2 In an Assise of Novel disseisin a Protection is not allowable Co. ibid. 131. a. 1. Co. l. 8. 50. a. 2 in Jehu Webbs case nor yet in a Certificate upon an Assise because an Assise is festinum remedium to restore the disseisee to his freehold whereof he is wrongfully and without Iudgement disseised And therefore in this action the defendant shall not be essoined nor pray in aid but only of the King nor vouch a stranger nor any party to the writ unless he will immediately enter into the warranty there is the same Law also of receipt neither shall the Paroll stay for the non-age either of the plaintif or defendant and in many other respects an Assise is remedium maximè festinum Dower Appeal Assise 3 In Dower Co. l. 9. 30. b. 3. in the case of the Abbot of Strata Mercella or in appeal brought by the feme of the death of her husband or in an Assise brought by a feme which was the wife of B. if the tenant or defendant plead that the baron is in full life the tryal thereof shall not be by the Iury but by the Iustices upon examination made before them and that course is taken for the greater expedition Nonage inspected 4 If the tenant in a real action vouch A. as heir within age Co. l. 9. 30. b. 4. The same case or if the tenant for life be impleaded and pray in aid of A in reversion within age and pray also that the Paroll may demurr c. In both these cases if the demandant reply that he is in full age this shall not be tried by the Country for the great delay of the demandant but a writ of Venire facias shall issue to the Sherif to bring A. before the Iustices to be inspected by them whether he be of age or no. Assise 5 Of all actions an Assise is most favoured in Law Pl. Co. 75. b. 4. Wimbish and the Lord Willoughby because it gives the most speedy remedy And therefore the Statute
down a tree where the trees are not exempted this is an implyed determination of the will Lease at will for that it would otherwise be a wrong in the lessor to do it So if a man lease a Manor at will whereunto a Common is appendant and the lessor puts in his beasts to use the Common this is also a determination of the will for otherwise he should be a trespassor Co. ibid. 78. b. 2. 3 By common intendment a will shall not be supposed to be made by collusion for In facto quod se habet ad bonum malum A Will. magis de bono quam de malo lex intendit Co. ibid. 119. a. 3. Littl. §. 179. 4 If there be tenant for life of land the reversion in fee Villein a Villein purchase the reversion and the tenant for life attorns In this case the Lord may justifie to enter upon the Land and claim the reversion and yet shall be no trespassor to the tenant for life for the Law will make construction that he entred to make his claim and not to commit trespass The like Law is also of a reversion after an estate in tail Statute Merchant or Staple Elegit and for years and of the reversion of a Seigniory rent common and any other freehold or inheritance issuing out of any lands or tenements of another Co. ibid. 170. b. 4. If Partition be made by the two Barons in the life-time of their femes coperceners albeit such partition be unequal yet it is not void Pa râ—tion but voidable for it shall be déemed good and lawfull until it be defeated by the entry of either of the femes if she happen to survive her husband There is the like Law of an Infant copercener Co. ibid. 171 a. 4. for it remains good if he defeat it not at his full age Feoffment upon condition 6 If a feoffment be made by deed poll upon condition Littl. §. 376. Co. ibid. 232. and the feoffor haps the deed poll and afterwards the condition is broken wherupon the feoffor re-enters In this case having the deed en poigne albeit it doth not properly appertain to him but to the feoffée yet he may make use of the deed and thereby plead the condition in justification of his entry and title for it will be rather intended that he came to the déed by lawfull Joint trespass than by tortious means Littl. §. 3â—7 So if there be two joynt trespassors and the party trespassed releaseth to one of them In this case also if the other trespassor be sued and have the release en poigne he may plead it in discharge of the trespass causa qua supra Bastard 7 If the husband be within the 4. seas viz. within the Iurisdiction of the King of England if the wife hath issue Co. ibid. 144. a. 2. no proof is to be admitted to prove the Child a Bastard for the question being whether he is legitimate or no the Law will rather deem him legitimate than Proles spurius a bastard And in this case Filiatio non potest probari The like 8 If a man hath issue two daughters the eldest being a Bastard Co. ibid. 244. a. 4. and they enter and enjoy the land peaceably together Here the Law in favour of legitimation will not adjudge the whole possession in the Mulier who indeed hath the only right but in both so as if the Bastard hath issue and dieth her issue shall inherit And in the same case if both daughters enter and make partition this partition shall bind the Mulier for ever The like 9 If the Bastard invite the Mulier to see his house Co. ibid. 245. a. 2. and to see pictures c. or to dine with him or to hawk hunt or sport with him or such like upon the land descended and the Mulier cometh upon the land accordingly this is no interruption because he came in by the consent of the Bastard and therefore the Law will not adjudge the coming upon the land in such case to be any trespass but if the Mulier cometh upon the ground upon his own head and cutteth down a tree or diggeth the soil or take any profit these shall be interruptions For rather than the Bastard shall punish him in an action of trespas the act shall amount in Law to an entry because he hath a right of Entry so it is if the Mulier put any of his Cattel into the ground or command another to do it these do amount to an entry for albeit in these cases the Mulier doth not use any express words of Entry yet these and such like acts do without any words amount in Law to an Entry for acts without words may make an Entry but words without an act viz. Entry into the land c. cannot make an Entry Vide infra 28. M scon inuance 10 If one process be awarded instead of another or a day is given which is not legal this is a miscontinuance of the sute Co. ibid. 325. a. 4. and if the tenant or defendant make default it is good cause of Error but if he appear then is the Miscontinuance salved for albeit in truth his appearance is not legal yet when he appears the Law shall construe it to be lawfull because there is a sute depending against him in Court Dâ—scontinuance of estates 11 If there be tenant for life the remainder in tail Co. ibid. 332 a. 4. and he in the remainder grants it to another in fee by deed and the tenant for life attorns this is no discontinuance of the remainder in tail So it is likewise of a rent charge Advowson in gross Common in gross or the like for the Rule is that a grant by deed of such things as do lie in grant and not in livery of seisin do work no discontinuance and the reason is because the Law makes construction that of such things the grant of tenant in tail worketh no wrong either to the issue in tail or to him in reversion or remainder for in such case the Law adjudged nothing to pass from the tenant in tail but that which he may lawfully grant viz. an estate for his own life Co. ibid. 335. a. 2. 12 If tenant for life make a lease for his own life to the lessor the remainder to the lessor and a stranger in fée Surrender Forfeiture In this case for as much as the limitation should work a wrong by construction of Law it rather inureth to the lessor as a surrender for the one moiety and a forfeiture as to the remainder of the stranger for he cannot give to the lessor that which he had before and as to the remainder to the stranger it is a forfeiture for his moiety and when the lessor entreth he shall take benefit thereof Co. Inst part 1. 381. b. 1. 13 The words of an Act
Inst pars 1 83. b. 3. All Earldoms and Baronies were derived from the Crown and were holden of the King in Capite and the King would not then suffer them to be divided or severed And such intire Earldoms and Baronies are within that Statute to pay relief according to the limitation thereof Howbeit at this day Earls and Barons are without such Earldoms and Baronies of the Kings gift in chief For at the creation of an Earl he hath sometimes an Annuity granted unto him and sometimes nothing at all but rather giveth somewhat for his Honour So as such Earls and Barons so created are cléerely out of the Statute of Magna Carta and are to pay such reliefs as other men that hold of the King in Capite For as the heir of a Knight shall not pay 100 s. relief unlesse he hath a Knights fée c. so neither the Earl nor Baron shall pay any relief by that Statute unlesse he hath an Earldom or Barony intended by the same Statute c. â—xecutors to â—ll lands 14 By the Statute of 21 H. 8. cap. 4. it is provided Co. ib. 113. a. 3. that where lands are willed to be sold by Executors though part of them refuse yet the residue may sell And here albeit the letter of the Law extendeth onely where Executors have a power to sell yet being a beneficial law it is by construction extended also where lands are devised to Executors to be sold Co. ib. 143. a. 4 Littl. Sect. 216. 15 The Law so regardeth equity and equality Tenure of land that it will in divers cases work according to them without any provision or reservation of the party And therefore if before the Statute of Quia emptores terrarum a man had made a feoffment in fée rendring rent to him and his heirs this was Rent-service for which he might distrain of common right And if he had made no reservation at all of any rent or service Yet the Feoffée should then have holden of the Feoffor by such service as the Feoffor held over of his Lord next paramount For the Law in this case did create a tenure Littl. Sect. 222. Co. ib. 148. b. 3. 16 If a man seised of divers lands of some in Fée-simple Rent-servâ—â— apportionable and of the rest in tail make a gift in tail or a lease for life or years of all reserving a rent and die Here if the issue in tail avoyd the gift or lease as to the entailed lands the rent shall be apportioned for seeing the rent is reserved out of and for the whole land it is reason that when part thereof is evicted by an elder title that the Donée or Lessée should not be charged with the whole rent but that it should be apportioned ratably according to the value of the land Co. ib. 154. a. 1. 17 By the Statute of 7 R. 2. cap. 10. it is enacted Equity upâ—â— 7 R. 2. â—â— that an Assise of rents issuing forth of lands in divers Counties shall be taken in Confinio comitatus which séems to be meant onely of Counties that border one upon another Neverthelesse albeit the Counties do not joyn but have twenty Counties lying between them yet the assise in Confinio comitatus doth lye and the Iustices shall sit between the said Counties And where the Statute seems to speak of two Counties onely the like Law is when the rent issueth out of lands lying in more Counties than two Co. ibid. a. 3. 18 The Statute of Merton cap. 2. made 20 H. 3. Equity upâ—â— Merton 20 H. 3. which gives the writ of Redisseisin is as followeth Item si quis fuerit disseisitus de libero tenemento coram justiciariis Itinerantibus seisinam suam recuperaverit per Assinam novae disseisinae vel per recognitionem eorum qui fecerint disseisinam ipse disseisitus per Vicecomitem seisinam suam habuerit fi iidem disseisitores posteà post iter justiciariorum vel infrà de eodem tenemento iterum eundem conquerentem disseisiverint inde convicti fuerint statim capiantur c. Here albeit this Statute seems to intend onely lands and tenements Littl. Sect. 233. yet Littleton § 233. Rent-sec◠〈◊〉 charge expounds it to extend also to a Rent-charge or a Rent-seck For although they are against common right yet a man may have a Free-hold in them And therefore if a man grant omnia tenementa sua a Rent-charge or a Rent-seck will also passe thereby Also by the same Statute the Assise seems to be limited to be taken onely coram justiciariis Itinerantibus Howbeit Littleton there speaketh generally and so is the Statute to be intended viz. before any other Iustices that have authority to take Assises and Justices Itinerant are onely set down there for an example And albeit that Statute saith Recuperavit per Assisam c. by the verdict of the Assise as Littleton in the same Chapter expoundeth it or per recognitionem c. by confession yet if the recovery be upon a demurrer or by pleading of a record and failer of it or by any other manner such recoveries are also within the equity of the same Statute And therefore Littleton in the abovesaid Section speaketh generally Et recovera le seisin del rent intimating that it ought to be understood of all manner of recoveries in an Assise of Novel disseisin Westm 2. â— by equity though peâ— And in that manner is the abovesaid Statute confirmed by Westm 2. cap. 26. And here it is worthy observation that this Statute is expounded by equity notwithstanding it is a penal Law for by the said Statute of Westminst 2. double damages is given upon the recovery Co. ib. 174. a. 3. Co. l. 4. 121. b. 4 Bastards case 19 There is a diversity between a recovery in value by force of a warranty upon an exchange and upon a partition Exchange Partition Recovery for upon an exchange he that loseth shall recover a full recompence for all that he so loseth But upon a partition the patcener that loseth shall onely recover the moity or half of that which is lost to the end that the losse may be equal 48. Equity of 32 H. 8. 32. 20 The Tenant by the Courtesie shall have a writ of Partition upon the Statute of 32 H. 8. cap. 32. Co. ib. 175. a. 4. as well as Ioyntenant or Tenant in common for life or years For albeit he is neither Ioyntenant nor Tenant in common because a praecipe lyeth against the Parcener or Tenant by the Courtesie yet forasmuch as he is in equal mischief as another Tenant for life he shall be intended within the equity of that Statute Division of lands Hotchpot 21 If a man seised of lands in fee hath issue two daughters Littl. Sect. 267. and gives part of them to one of his daughters in Frankmarriage and dies In this case albeit
the lands undisposed of excéed in value the other lands given in Frankmarriage yet shall not the Donée in Frank-marriage have any part thereof unlesse she will put her part in Hotchpot with the other lands and then they shall be equally divided betwéen the sisters And it séemeth by our old books Co. ib. 176. b. 3 Glanvil l. 7. cap. 5. that by the ancient Law there was also a kind of resemblance hereof concerning goods Si autem post debita deducta Division of the testators goods post deductionem expensarum quae necessariae erunt id totum quod tunc superfuerit dividatur in tres partes quorum una pars relinquatur pueris si pueros habuerit defunctus secunda uxori si superstes fuerit Et de tertia parte habeat testator liberam disponendi facultatem si autem liberos non habeat tunc medietas defuncto alia medietas uxori Si autem sine uxore decesserit liberis existentibus tunc medietas defuncto alia medietas liberis tribuatur Si autem sine uxore liberis tunc id totum defuncto remanebit Lambert 119. 68. And by the law before the Conquest it was thus provided Sive quis in curia sive morte repentine fuerit intestatus mortuus Dominus tamen nullam rerum suarum partem praeter eam quae jure debetur herioti nomine sibi assumito verùm eas judicio suo uxori liberis cognatione proximis justè pro suo cuique jure distribuito Frankmarriâ—ge Hotchpot 22 If a man seised of 30 acres of land each acre of equal value Littl. §. 273. Co. Inst pars 1. 179. a. 1. hath issue two daughters and gives 15 acres to one of them in Frankmarriage and dies seised of the other 15 acres In this case the other sister shall have the 15 acres so descended and the Baron and Feme shall not put their 15 acres in Hotchpot with them because the parts are already equal but this is to be thus understood if they are of equal value at the time when the Partition should be made For if the land given in Frankmarriage be by the act of God decayed in value or if the remnant of the lands in Fée-simple be improved after the gift they may be cast into Hotchpot And the Law will adjudge of the value as it is at the time of the Partition unlesse it be by the proper act or default of the parties c. And it séemeth to some that in case they be of equal value at the time of the partition that then the reversion in fée of the lands given in Frankmarriage shall onely descend to the Donee for otherwise the other sister shall have more benefit than the Donee and so their parts would not be equal and then their parts might be put into Hotchpot notwithstanding the 30 acres are all of equal value at the time of the partition which is against the reason that Littleton gives Sect. 273 c. â—rvivor of â—yntenants 23 If there be two Ioyntenants in fee Co. ib. 193. a. 3. and the one letteth his part to another for the life of the Lessor and the Lessor dieth some say that his part shall survive to his companion for that by his death the lease was determined Howbeit others hold the contrary and their reason is First because at the time of his death the joynture was severed for so long as he lived the lease continued And secondly because notwithstanding the act of any one of the Ioyntenants there must be equal benefit of survivor as to the Frée-hold but here if the other Ioyntenant had first died there had béen no benefit of Survivor to the Lessor without question because at that time the joynture would have béen severed And this last séems to be the opinion of Coke for that he puts it last according to his own rule and the course which he observes Littleton to use Co. ib. 341. b. 4. 24 A Bishop Abbot Dean Master of an Hospital Abbot c. Writ of right Parson a Jâ—â— utrum or any other such body politique or corporate which hath a sole seisin of lands in fée in right of their several Corporations if any such be ousted they shall if néed be have a remedie agréeable to their right viz. a Writ of Right which is the highest remedy for that they have the highest estate It is otherwise of a Parson because the intire fée and right is not in him his highest writ being a Juris utrum c. Co. ib. 365. b. 2. 25 Albeit the Statute of Glocester cap. 3. made in 6 E. 1. Alienation by Tenant by courtesie no barre for the relief of the heir against the alienation of the Father Tenant by the courtesie with warranty c. maketh one by mention of a Writ of Mortdancester Cosenage Aiel and Besaiel yet a Writ of Right a Formedon a Writ of Entry ad communem legem and all other like actions are within the purview of that statute for those actions are but put for examples Again where it is said in the same Statute if the Tenant by the Courtesie alien yet his release with warranty to a Disseisor c. is within the purview of that Statute because it is in equal mischief and if that evasion might take place that Stat. should have béen made in vain So also if Tenant by the Courtesie be of a Seigniory and the tenancy escheat unto him and after he alieneth with warranty this shall not bind the issue unlesse assets descend for it is in equal mischief c. Co. ib. 313. a. 2. 26 Albeit the preamble of the Statute of 34 H. 8. cap. 20. Gifts of the King 34 H 〈◊〉 20. extendeth onely to gifts in tail made by the Kings of England before that Act viz. hath given granted c. and the bodie of the Act referreth to the preamble viz. that no such feigned recovery hereafter to be had against such tenant in taile c. So as this word such may seem to couple the bodie and the preamble together Yet in this case such shall be taken for such in equal mischief or in like case and by divers parts of the Act it appeareth that the makers of the Act intended to extend it to future gifts and so is the Law taken at this day without question Littl. Sect. 732. Co. ib. 383. b. 1. 27 Some do expound these words of the Stat. of Glocester cap. 3. Heritage in Gloc. 3. iâ— heritance by purchase 〈◊〉 the heritage of his mother to be the lands which the mother hath by descent And that construction is true but that Stat. by the authority of Littleton Sect. 732. extendeth also where the mother hath it by purchase in Fée-simple for so saith Littleton himself that this word Inheritance is not onely intended where a man hath lands by descent but likewise where a man hath a
jointenants of the land and the husband soweth the ground and the land surviveth to the wife 8 Ass pl. 21. 8 E. 3. 54. Dyer 316. It is said that she shall have the Corn and not the executors and the Law seems to be so because they were as one person in Law and held by intietties Co. ibid. 75. b. 4. 6 The tenure by Knight service being at first ordained for the defence of the Commonwealth both against domestique insurrections and forein invasions a Militia being indeed the chief pillar that supports a Commonwealth the due observance thereof was strictly enjoyned by the Laws of Edward the Confessor Knight service where you shall find it thus provided Lamb. 135. Debent enim universi liberi homines c. secundum feodum suum secundum tenementa sua arma habere illa semper prompta conservare ad tuitionem regni servitium dominorum suorum juxta praeceptum Domini Regis explendum et peragendum And William the Conquerer confirmed that Law in these words Statuimus et firmiter praecipimus quod omnes Comites Barones Milites et Servientes universi liberi homines totius regni nostri praedicti habeant teneant se semper in armis et in equis ut decet et oportet et quod sint semper prompti parati ad servitium suum integrum nobis explendum peragendum cum semper opus adfuerit secundum quod nobis debent de feodis et tenementis suis de jure facere c. The like 7 The tenure by Knight service because it was instituted for the Guard and defence of the Commonwealth was so much favoured in Law Co. ibid. 76. b. 4. that betwixt the making of the Statutes of 4 H. 7. 17. and 27 H. 8. 10. of Uses there might lie two wardships for one and the same land as if Cestuy que use before the Statute of 27 H. 8. had died his heir within age the Lord should have had the wardship of his heir by force of the Statute of 4 H. 7. and if the feoffée had died his heir within age the Lord should have had the wardship of his heir also viz. by the course of the Common Law And at the Common Law before the making of those Statutes there might be two wardships in respect of the same land as if tenant by Knight service had made a gift in tail the remainder in fee and tenant in tail had made a feoffment in fee and died his heir within age the Lord should have had the wardship of him and if the feoffee had died his heir within age Co. ibid. 77. a. 1. the Lord should have also had the wardship of his heir and of the land so likewise if tenant by Knight service make a gift in tail and the donee maketh a feoffment in fee and the donee dieth his heir within age the donor shall have the wardship of him because he is his tenant in right but if the feoffee dieth his heir within age the Lord paramount shall have the wardship of his heir because en fait he is tenant to him c. And the Common Law did not remedy this inconvenience because that tenure was deemed serviceable for the Commonwealth Tillage 8 Agriculture or Tillage is much favoured and of great esteem Co. ibid. 85. b. 1. because it is very profitable for the Commonwealth concerning which the goodness of the habit is best known by the privation For by laying of lands used in tilth to pasture six main inconveniences doe daily encrease 1. Idleness Co. l. 4. 39. a. in Tirringhams case which is the beginning and ground of all mischiefs 2. Depopulation and decay of Towns 3. Husbandry which is one of the greatest Commodities of the Realm is decayed 4. Churches are destroyed and the service of God neglected by diminution of Church-livings as by decay of Tithes c. 5. Injury and wrong is done to Patrons and Gods Ministers And 6. The defence of the land against forein Enemies is enfeebled and impaired the bodies of Husbandmen being more strong and able and patient of cold heat and hunger than of any other from which Inconveniences necessarily follow these consequences 1. The displeasure of Almighty God 2. The subversion of the Policy and good government of the Realm And all this appeareth in our books And therefore the Common Law giveth arable land antiently called Hyde or Gaine the precedence before Meadows Pastures Woods Mines or any other ground whatsoever And averia carucae the beasts of the Plough have in some cases more privileges than other cattel c. This imployment was also of high estimation amongst the antient Romans Co. Inst part 1. 161. a. 1. in so much that the grave Senators themselves would put their hand to the plough c. If the Lord will distrain averia carucae where there is a sufficient distress besides the tenant may make rescous O Fortunatos nimium sua si bona norunt Agricolas quibus ipsa procul discordibus armis Fundit humo facilem victum justissima Tellus Virg. in Georg. Co. ibid. 99. a. 2. 9 An Abbot or Prior c. who holdeth lands by Knight service Abbot Prior. albeit he ought not in respect of his profession to serve in war in proper person yet must he find a sufficient man conveniently arrayed for the warr to supply his place And if he can find none then must he pay Escuage c. for his possession doth not privilege him but that the Kings service in his warr must be done which belongeth to his tenure and concerneth both the honor and safety of the Common-wealth Co. ibid. 127. a. 4. Bract. lib. 6. fo 6. 10 The life and members of every subject are under the safeguard and protection of the King Life and Member for as Bracton saith Vita et membra sunt in potestate Regis And herewith agréeth a notable Record Pasch 19 E. 1. coram Rege Rot. 36. Northt Vita membra sunt in manu Regis to the end that they may serve the King and the Commonwealth when occasion shall be offered And therefore if the Lord mayhem his Villein the King shall punish him for mayheming his subject Villein by fine ransom and imprisonment until the fine and ransom be paid because he hath thereby disabled him to do the King and Common-wealth service Co. ibid. 130. a. 4. 11 The Protections Quia Profecturus which concerns services of warr as the Kings souldier Protections c. and Quia Moraturus which concerns wisdom and counsel as the Kings Ambassador or Messenger pro negotiis regni being for the publique good of the Realm privat mens actions and sutes must be then suspended for a convenient time for Jura publica anteferenda privatis and again Jura publica ex privatis promiscue decidi non debent And the cause of granting