names come to his knowledge which formerly he had not knowledge of therefore ordered he may examine them before the examinor ad informanduÌ„ conscientiam Iudicis The plaintant comming to the defendant shewed him a Writ but did deliveâ— him neither note of the day of his appearance neither did the same appear unto him by the Schedâ—le labell or any other paper and the defendant appearing found no Bill It is ordered the defendant be allowed good costs and an Atâ—achment against the plaintant for such serving Brightman plaintant Powtrell defendant Anno 19. Eliz. The plaintant called the deâ—endant dwelling in the County Palatine of Châ—â—ter by processe to anâ—â—er a Bill for lands lyiâ—g in the said County Palatine contrary to a generall order lately certified into this Court by her Majesties appointment touching the said County Palatine according to the said generall order Willoughby plaintant Brearton defendant An. 19. Eliz. The plaintants Bill is that he leassed a house to the defendant and did covenant to build and repaire it before a day which being at hand and shewed that he had prepared Timber and workmen to performe the same but the defendant as well to have him breake his Covenant as to free himselfe from his Covenant to keep it in reparations did interrupt and threaten the workemen whereby they durst not proceed to repaire and so the houses are decayed and the plaintant hath no remedy to force the defendant to suffer him to repaire the defendant demurred upon the Bill alleadging the plaintant hath sufficient remedy by Law which kind of answer this Court alloweth not therefore a Subpoena is awarded against the defendant to answer Wood plaintant Tirrell defendant Anno 19. Eliz. Where it appeared by a Booke heretofore presented to the Queenes Highnesse under the hands of Sir Iames Dyer Knight Lord chiefe Justice of the commou Pleas Mr. Justice Weston late a Justice of the same Court Mr. Justice Harpar late another Justice of the same Court and Mr. Justice Carus late a Justice of her Majesties Bench and remaining by force of her Majesties Warrant of Record in the Court of Chancery touching the Jurisdiction of the County Palatine of Chester that before the raigne of King Henry the third all Pleas of Lands and Tenements and all other causes and contracts and matters residing and growing within the said County Palatine of Chester are pleadable and ought to be pleaded and heard and judicially determined within the said County Palatine of Chester and not elsewhere out of the said County Palatine and if any be heard pleaded or judicially determined out of the same County then the same is void and coram non Iudice except it be in case of error Foraign Plea or forraigne voucher and also that no inhabitant within the said County Palatine by the Lawes liberties and usages of the same be called or compelled by any Writ or processe to appear or answer any matter or cause out of the said County Palatine for any the causes aforesaid as by the said Book among other things more at large appeareth and where now of late the plaintant hath exhibited a Bill of complaint into this Honourable Court for and concerning certaine lands and tenements lying within the said County Palatine and hath taken processe against the said defendant in that behalfe who hath thereupon appeared and by his Councell made request to this Court that for the causes aforesaid the matter here exhibited against him might be from henceforth dismissed wherefore forasmuch as William Sayler hath made oath that the said lands doe lye within the said County Palatine and that the said defendant is inhabiting and dwelling within the said County therefore the said cause is from henceforth dismissed and remitted to the Chamberlaine of Chester and other her Majesties Ministers there according to the Tenour of the same Booke Wllloughby Miles plaintant Brearton defendant An. 19. Eliz. Iearvise Wheatly made oath for the serving of a Subpoena upon the defendant to testifie on the behalfe of the plaintant at the Guildhall in London who hath not thereupon appeared therefore an Attachment is awarded against him Batt plaintant Rookes defendant An. 19. Eliz. A Bill was exhibited by the plaintant against Roger Haule supervisor of the last will of Thomas Clifton and one Roger Haule was served with processe that was no supervisor of the said Cliftons will and alleadged that the said Roger Haule who was the supervisor was dead and ordered the defendant shall put in his allegation upon oath by way of Answer and then desire Judgement whether he shall be compelled to answer the said Bill or not and therein pay his costs for his wrongfull vexation which shall be thereupon allowed to him Harrison plaintant Haule defendant An. 19. Eliz. The plaintants are adjudged to pay to the defendants 20 s. costs comming upon processe of Subpoena to testifie on their behalfe and having no charges tendered unto them nor any interrogatories put in for them to be examined upon Pearce and uxor ejus plaintants Crawthorn and White defendants Anno 19. Eliz. Lawrence Hide gentleman being called upon by processe by the plaintant to testifie informed this Court that he was ready to depose so that he might first have his costs to him allowed which this Court thought reasonable Belgraâ—e plaintant Edward Earle of Hertford and William Drury deâ—endants An. 19. Eliz. Thomas Hawtry gent was served with a Subpoena to testifie his knowledge touching the cause in variance and made oath that he hath been and yet is a Sollicitor in this suite hath received severall Fees of the defend which being informed to the Master of the Rols it is ordered that the said Thomas Hawâ—ry shall not be compelled to be deposed touching the same and that he shall be in no danger of any contempt touching the not executing of the said processe Berd plaintant Lovelace defendant Anno 19. Eliz. The plaintant exhibited his Bill as well in his own as in his wives name concerning a promise made by the defendants to the plaintant and his wife to make them a Lease of the Mannor of Appescourt during their lives the defendants demurre for that the plaintant ought to have a Bill of Revivor against them for that his wife is dead since the Bill exhibited which cause of demurrer this Court alloweth not for that the promise was made during the Coverture and the plaintant claimeth not the same in right of his wife therefore the defendants are ordered to answer directly to the Bill Thorne plaintant Brend Wilkinson and Alice defendants Anno 19. Eliz. Austen plaintant Vesey defendant the defendant is served with a Subpoena to testifie and for that it appeared by Affidavit that he was Sollicitor in the same cause to one of the parties he was discharged and not admitted to be examined An. 19. and 20. Eliz. Hartford plaintant Lee and Alice defendants the
is ordered the plaintant shall between this and Friday next bring into this Court a certificate from the officers of the Queens house or otherwise whereby this Court may credibly understand that his attendance in Court is necessary and that he cannot conveniently be absent or if he cannot so doe then the matter is remitted to the determination of the Commissioners in the marches of Wales Phillip Mannering plaintant Henry Smallwood and Alice defendants Anno 1. Eliz. fol. 51. Mannering plaintant Smallwood and Alice defendants for want of a certificate that the plaintants attendance in Court is necessary the cause is dismissed into the marches of Wales Anno 1. Eliz. fol. 62. The plaintants husband was bound in a Statute of 160 l. to pay 160 l. and after by Indenture the defendant did grant unto the plaintants husband that if he failed in the payment of the said 160 l. the same should be levyed of certaine lands then the said plaintants husbands lands called Stirbeck and some other lands specially named lying in Hawthorne in the County of Lincolne the husband dyed and the defendant sued execution as well of other lands in the occupation of the plaintants late husband as of the said lands mentioned in the Indenture And Sir Nicholas Bacon Lord Keeper of the great Seale of England granted an injunction against the defendant immediately to remove from the possession of all the other lands except of those onely contained in the Indenture and that he should quietly suffer the plaintant to enjoy the same Margaret Pulvertost widdow plaintant and Gilbert Pulvertost defendant Anno 1. Eliz. fol. 51. An Injunction was granted to the plaintant upon the surmises of his Bill with this clause si ita sit that the plaintant be in possession by good conveyance in Law as he alleadgeth Nota it was then usuall to grant Injunctions upon surmises with a proviso si ita sit Fodringham Christopherus plaintant Richard Chomeley defendant Anno 1. Eliz. fol. 67. Forasmuch as the defendant is under age and by inspection not above the age of fifteen yeers therefore George Wyat is by this Court named and appointed Gardian to the defendant Hugh Langley plaintant and Philip Mark defendant Anno 1. Eliz. fol. 73. A Commission is awarded to the Sheriffe of Nottingham and â—erby to put the plaintant in possession of certain lands for which he formerly had an Injunction against the defendants which they have disobeyed William Boles plaintant Richard Walley and Alice defendants Anno 1. Eliz. fol. 84. The defendant is enjoyned in open court upon paine of 200 l. not to proceed any further in an action upon the case by him commenced in the Kings Bench against the plaintant nor that he procure the Jury to be sworne in the issue but onely to record their appearance untill to morrow at which time further Order shall be taken by the Court George Riche plaintant Edmond Foard defendant Anno 1. Eliz. fol. 88. Upon information the defendant disobeyed a writ of subpoena brought to be served against her and that they which should have served the said writ were beaten and wounded therefore an Attachment was granted against the defendant and a subpoena against Edmond Pirton returned immediate William Rove and Rose his wife plaintants Agnes west widdow defendant Anno 1. Eliz. fol. 90. and 97. Where the said Edward Pyke hath of long time been aâ—d yet is in execution upon a Statute at the suite of the late King Edward the 6. Forasmuch as upon the examination of the matter befoâ—e the Lord Keeper of the Great Seale of England in open Court it manifestly appeareth that there was not just cause why the said Pyke should remaine in execution as Gâ—lbert Gerrard and Rosewell Esquire the Queenes Majesties Attorney and Solliciter Generall being present did confesse and agree It is therefore now ordered that a Writ of supersedeas be directed to the Warden of the Fleet in whose custody the said Pyke now is commanding him by the same forthwith upon the receipt thereof to deliver out of prison the body of the said plaintant provided alwayes before his deliverance he be bound to her Majesty by Recognizance in 100 l. not onely to make his further appearance to answer her Highnesse any thing hereafter shall happen to be laid to his charge concerning the said execution but also to stand to and obey all such order and determination as the said Lord Keeper of the Great Seale and this court shall hereafter take in the matter in variance between him and the said Graunt Edward Pyke plaintant Robert Graunt defendant Anno 1. Eliz. fol. 166. Pakine the Husband onely appeared and put in a demurrer in both their names without oath of impotency or otherwise for non appearance of Ioan his wife whereupon an Attachment is awarded against the defendants Thomas Spicer and Katherine his wise plaintants Iohn Pakine and Ioanâ— his wife defendants An. 1. Eliz. fol. 170. Thomas Hodge plaintant William Smith defendant the defendant demurred by his Counsell not appearing in person therefore a Subpoena was awarded against him to make a direct answer An. 1. Eliz. fol. 230. Iohn Iackson Attorney for the defendant at the common Law is in open Court enjoyned that neither he nor any other by his means do further proceed in an action of tresp commenced against the plaint and depending at the coÌ„mon law nor call for Judgement untill further order shall be therein taken by the Lord Keeper of the great Seale of England and high Court of Chancery Iohn Sedgewick and Alice plaintants Will Redman defendant An. 1. Eliz. fol. 212. The plaintant served the defendant with a Subpoena to appear in Chancery whereof he made oath and because the defendant did not appear and Injunction was awarded against the defendant his Councellors and Attorneyes upon paine of 200 l. not to proceed in Judgement in an action of debt of 40 l. in the common Pleas against the defendant An. 1. Eliz. fol 213. Thomas Knot plaintant Thomas Iackson defendant David Eyre was served with a Subpoena ad testificandum for the plaintant in a cause depending in this Court and Thomas Eyre made oath that the said David Eyre was at the serving of the said Subpoena upon him and yet is so sick that he is not able to travell hither to testifie therefore a Commission is granted to such Commissioners as the plaintant will nominate to examine him Iohn Wade plaintanr Gwye and Alice defendant An. 1. Eliz. fol. 240. An Attachment was awarded against the defendant for his not appearance upon oath he was served with a Subpoena who now appeared gratis and would have excused himselfe that he had no notice of the Subpoena but he that served the Subpoena deposed he did hang the same upon the defendants doore and within halfe an houre after saw him abroad with a writ in his hand which he supposed to be
a Subpoena to the defendants wife being in the defendants house who hath not appeared therefore an Attachment is awarded Barlow plaintant Baker defendant Anno 18. and 19. Eliz. It is decreed by Assent that the defendant being Lord of the Mannor of Alderswasley shall have for a fine of a Coppyholder upon a Surrender one whole yeares value as the same is reasonable worth according to the usuall rates of Lands in that Countrey Blackwall and Alice Tenants of the Mannor of Alderswasley plaintants Low defendant An. 18. and 19. Eliz. The defendant confesseth by her answer the having of a Tablet or Pomander in Gold demanded by the plaintant and as to the 20 l. likewise demanded by the plaintant by him left with the said dâ—fendant as a token at such time as he was a suter for marriage to the defendant she confesseth the same was left with her against her will and she delivered the same over unto one Sydole her brother who was a dealer with her on the plaintants behalfe to the end hee should deliver the same over to the plaintant It is ordered the Tablet be forthwith delivered by the defendant to the plaintant which was done presently in Court and as to the 20 l. the plaintant shall call in the said Sidole by processe Young plaintant Burrell and Elizabeth uxor ejus defendants Anno 18 and 19. Eliz. The plaintant by his Bill sheweth that the Copy of the Court â—oll whereby the defendants pretend title was indirectly entered by the Stewards Clarke of the mannor the defendants demurre for that the plaintants shall not be received by surmise to object against or impeach the said Court Rols and alleadgeth further the Copy was found by the homage to be true which causes seem to this Court very insufficient It is therefore ordered if cause be not shewed before Wednesday for maintenance of the demurrer then a Subpoena is awarded against the defendants to make answer Holden and Holden plaintants Cleark and Alice defendants Anno 18. and 19. Eliz. The plaintaint hath exhibited his Bill of Revivor against two where the first Bill was against three and the personage in question is named by another name then in the former Bill therefore ordered if cause be not shewed by a day the defendant shall be discharged Heines plaintant William Day Deane of Windsor and Hatchines defendants An. 18. and 19. Eliz. William Lowgher appeared and answered but Rob. Lowgher claimed the priviledge of the university of Oxf. but because the said Doct. Lowgher was joyned with William Lowgher in the bill who was not subject to the same Jurisdiction therefore ordered processe to be awarded against him to shew other cause why he should not answer White plaintant Rob. Lowgher Doctor of Divinity and Will Lowgher defend An. 18. 19. Eliz. The defendant is adjudged to pay to the plaintants 40 s. costs for suing out processe of contempt against him being discharged by her Majesties generall pardon Iones and Parris plaintant Iones defend An. 18. and 19. Eliz. There is more presidents of the like case Walter Ieames made oath that he hanged a Subpoena on the door of one Stacy Barry widdow and that the defendant used to resort thither as he heard reported before that time who hath not appeared therefore an attachment was awarded Ieames plaintant Morgan defendant An. 18. and 19. Eliz. The plaintant exhibited his Bill against the defendant by practise of purpose to examine witnesses and did examine witnesses accordingly whereas the cause chiefely concerned one Thomas Staunton and Will Bayes and therefore ordered that the depositions should be suppressed and that the said Staunton and Bayles shall exhibite a Bill into this Court against all such as they thinke to be parties to the fraudulent abusing of this Court Walford plaintant Walford defendant An. 19. Eliz. It is informed that the parties dwell in the County Palatine of Lancaster and the matter of the Bill is for a supposed trespasse in entring upon the defendants lands and consuming his grasse and hay upon the same which this Court doth not use to hold Plea of therefore ordered if it be true then the cause is dismissed and the plaintant to take his remedy in the County Palatine of Lancaster Hameâ—heson plaintant Tounstall Covell Rigmaden and Baldwin defendants An. 19. Eliz. The plaintants suit is to have an award made by Master Tilbey and Mr. Chambers Arbitrators indifferently chosen performed and both parties were bound each to other for the performance of the award and one part of the award was that if any question did grow between the parties the arbitrators should end it It is ordered a Subpoena to shew cause Launcellot Barker plaintant Peter Barker defend An. 19. Eliz. The plaintant exhibiteth a Bill of complaint against Luce and Maulde two of the defendants and after Commission Maulde marrieth Iohn Bourne the other defendant and the plaintant then exhibited a Bill of Revivor against the defendants which needeth not as it seemeth to this Court therefore ordered if there be no cause of revivor that Bourne and his wife who are called up by processe to answer the same Bill are licenced to depart without answer to the Bill of revivor and the plaintant to pay him such costs as this Court shall award Iackson and Vxor plaintants Luce Smith Iohn Bourne and Maulde his wife defendants An. 19. Eliz. The plaintant by his Bill pretends title to certaine lands and Freehold Lands which lands the defend claims to hold by Copy of court Roll to him and his heires of one Thomas Stedolph Esq. Lord of the mannor of Milcklam in the county of Surrey whereof the said lands are parcell and prayed in aide of the said Stedolph neverthelesse the plaintant served the said Arnold with processe to rejoyne without calling the said Stidolph thereunto which this Court thinkes not meet therefore ordered the plaintant shall no further proceed against the defendant before he have called the said Stidolph in by processe Lucas plaintant Arnold defendant Anno 19. Eliz. The said Holgate maketh oath he left an injunction in the house of the defendant and that the defendant Elizabeth White Thomas Crimore and Robert Watkins have disobeyed the same therefore an Attachment is awarded against them Holgate and Vxor ejus planitants Grantham defendant An. 19. Eliz. The defendant this day made his personall appearance upon a Commission of Rebellion for saving his bond made to the Commissioners in that behalfe Brown plaintant Derby defendant Anno 19. Eliz. Commonly it is used to take the Bonds in the name of the Lord Chancellor Lord Keeper of the Great Seale of England the Master of the Rols or to any two of the Masters of the Chancery all which are good and allowable by the practise of the Court of Chancery Upon affidavit made by the plaintant that since publication granted he had divers witnesses setting down their
defendant was served with a Subpoena at his suit got an attachment against the defendant whereupon he was apprehended and returned languidus It is ordered that the attachment be discharged by supersedeas the defendant paying 20 s. 6 d. to the Warden of the Fleet and the ordinary charges to the plaintant Brearton plaintant Ap Roberts defendant Anno 22. Eliz. It is informed that Coleston one of the defendants examined his own wife as a witnesse It is thereofore ordered the plaintant may take a Subpoena against her on his behalfe and if Colston will not suffer her to be examined on the plaintants party then her examination on the said Colstons party is suppressed Bent plaintant Allot and Colston defendants Anno 22. Eliz. Upon the hearing of the cause it appeared that the suit was to be releived of a promise made by the defendant to the plaintant to surrender a lease upon payment of 100 Markes by the plaintant unto him and for that the matter is meet for the common Law therefore dismissed Grevill plaintant Bowker defendant Anno 22. Eliz. The Court was informed by one Palmer that the three defendants are his servants and were served with Subpoena to be examined before the Town Clark of London who refused to be there examined because the matter is not depending in London but in her Majesties Bench and yet Attachment is gotten against them which kind of examination of witnesses this Court taketh to be unorderly and therefore ordered the Attachment be discharged Price plaintant Tench Holland and Packhouse defendants An. 22. Eliz. The Earle of Huntingdon Presedent of the North signified by his Letters to the Lord Chancellor that the lands for which the Bill is exhibited were ordered for the defendant by the Counsell of the North parts where the parties dwell and land lyeth and the now plaintant upon serving his Subpoena was ordered by the councell there to surcease his suit in this Court and stand to the order of the said counsell and yet the plaintant hath procured an Attachment against the defendant therefore ordered the Attachment be discharged and the matter dismissed Harrison plaintant Harrison defendant An. 22. Eliz. The defendant demurred because he is the Lord Treasurers man and therefore ought to be priviledged in her Majesties court of Exchequer which cause of demurrer the Court allowed not for that the defend can have no priviledge unlesse it were in such a case as the plaint might have remedy in the Court of Exchequer Lewin plaintant Fawdesley defendant An. 22. Eliz. The defendant made oath the plaintant shewed him a Subpoena holding it in his own hand and said it was against him but would not let him have it or see it so that he might read it neither would he deliver him any note of his appearance nor tell him the same but took witnesse that he had served the Subpoena and about an hour after came again to the defendant saying you were desirous to see the Subpoena here it is and thereupon shewed the labell to the defendant but in such sort as he could not see the returne whereupon the defendant appearing found no Bill therefore Attachment against the plaintant for misdemeanor Mead plaintant Crosse defend An. 22. Eliz. The plaint is Grandfather on the Mothers side to whom the Lands cannot come by the death of the infant exhibiteth a Bill against the Grandfather on the part of the fathers side to have the education and bringing up of one Richard Edge an infant who is seized of an Estate Taile of Lands the remainder to the defendant and to have the disposing of the profits of the Lands But ordered with the defendant for that it appeared there were divers remainders between the defendants and the infants estate Sweetman plaintant Edge defendant An 20. Eliz. Francis plaintant Sacheverill defendant The defendant is adjudged to pay to Iohn Hide 20 s. costs he appearing upon a Subpoena to testifie on his behalfe An. 22. Eliz. The plaintant purchased Lands of the defend An. 2. Eliz And had a Recognizance then acknowledged unto him for performing Covenants of the bargaine and sale and put one in trust to get both the indenture and â—ecognizance inrolled and paid him for the same and now being evicted out of the possession of the lands came to take out a scir. fac upon the Recognizance but finds it not inrolled and therefore desireth the same might now be inrolled It is ordered that a Subpoena be awarded against the defendant to shew cause why it should not and M. Solliciter who is present at the motion is to give notice to some of his Clients who have purchased as he alleadged parcell of the lands to shew cause why it shall not be inrolled Siddenham plaintant Harrison defendant An. 22. Eli. The defendants informe that the Bill is exhibited for certaine Lands parcell of the Dutchy of Lancaster and therefore ordered that for so much it shall be dismissed Price plaintant Lloyd Owen and Read defendants Anno 22. Eliz. The matter upon hearing appeared to be for a promise wherewith the defendant chargeth the plaintant and 12 d. in money accepted upon the said promise whereupon some trials or non suits have passed it is orded that for the ending of the said matter of promise that the matter be referred to the Common Law to be tryed Sutton plaintant Erington defendant An. 22. Eliz. The defendant informed he was called upon by Subpoena dated the 8. of February and by answer saith the said Iane Piers was married the 8. of February and so at that time purchasing the Writ a woman Covert therefore the defendant is dismissed with 13 s. 4 d. costs Iane Peirs plaintant Iohn Cawse defendant Anno 22. Eliz. The defendant was in possession at the time of the Bill exhibited the plaintant entered upon him the defendant desired that either he might have an Injunction for his possession or else that the cause might be dismissed which the Court thought reasonable it is ordered the plaintant shall shew cause why it should not be granted Hill plaintant Portman defendant Anno 22. Eliz. The plaintant Thomas Hilliar exhibited his Bill against the said William Kendall that the said Thomas Hilliar was seized in Fee of two Messuages 70. Acres of Pasture Furzes and Heath in Lanlivery parcell of the Queenes Majesties Dutchy of Cornewall and thereupon a prohibition against the said Will Kendall libelling in the Spirituall Court for Tithes as Farmer to the said Batten Vicar there pretending that right of Tythes for lands holden of her Majesty as of her Dutchy of Cornewall ought to be determined in this Court and also that the said Iohn Hilliar had exhibited the like Bill and procured a prohibition out of this Court against the said Batten It is ordered a Subpoena be awarded against the plaintant to shew cause why a consultation should not be granted Hilliar and Hilliar
Possession sororis for the heire collaterall 5 Possession of the Mother for the Heire collater 6 Payment of creditors out of a Coppyhold 7 Perpetuities no help 8 Purchasor better then a surety in case of reliefe 13 Power to make Leases 21 Payment by the surety 19 Possession bound by decree 23 Plaintant mistaking his Title in his Bill 24 Proceeding where there is no proofe 25 Publication of witnesses in perpetuall memory a yeare past 33 Publication of witnesses to be used in a Court Baron 35 plaintant in execution at the suit of the King delivered by supersedeas 39 Plaint bringing 223 l. in Court execution to stay for the rest 47 Plaint distraineth after replication therefore an Injunction 48 Plaint in execution upon Statute delivered upon recognizance 50 Plaint to take execution for 100 l. of a Judgement of 300 l. 51 Plaint married before answer no Bill of revivor 52 Plaint sueth for tokens delivered as a suitor in marriage 54 Prosecuting contempts after a generall pardon payeth costs 56 Plaint to make one a party whom the defendant prayeth in ayde 57 Plaintant requires one to appeare in the Queens name costs 68 Prohibition for Tythes of Lands held in capite 79 Plaint enters upon the defendants possession an Injunction or dismissed 98 Prohibition for tythes parcell of the Dutchy of Cornewall consultation 98 Perjury for making oath one of the same name sued and discharged 99 Plaint to shew where he had his counterfeit Writs 107 R. RAvishment de guard a Subpoena 9 Release of Joint feoffee 14 Reliefe for a trust upon a Lease 76 Rent reserved and paid the heire ordered to pay it 92 Rent charge upon severall men Lands and levyed upon one an Injunction is granted 22 S. SUing in a wrong County ayde for the plaintant here 2 Statute Lands priority sans coven 8 Survivor in joynt Tenancy 9 Suerâ—y chargeable and not in some cases 12 Supply of true meaning in feoffments 16 Statute acknowledged in my name 22 Statute for charitable uses 28 Subpoena to appear before the Major of London 43 Sheriffe amerced for return non est inventus 44 Setting down depositions in a wrong sence 47 Subpoena delivered to the defendants wife 54 Subpoena hanged on a dore where the defend resorted 56 Suit to have the defend performe an award 57 Subpoena to testifie Attachment for not appearing 61 Soliciter served to testifie ordered not to be examined 62 Soliciter served to testifie is discharged 63 Suit to have an award decreed 64 Suit for common of pasture 64 Subpoena delived to the defendants servant 65 Suit retained after Judgement and execution 74 Subpoena delivered to the defendants wife 78 Suit for 10 s. rent per annum dismissed 80 Suit for a hawke and evidences dismissed 82 Suit stayed in the Kings Bench removed from London 83 Suit for common 83 Svbpoena served within two dayes of the Termes end 88 Soliciter ordered to be examined with caution 89 Subpoena left in the defendants Hall Attachment 91 Server of a Subp. imprisoned attach against defend 91 92 Subpoena shewed and offered attach for not appearing 94 Suit upon a promise to surrender a Lease dismissed 95 Subpoena to testifie where no suit is discharged 95 Subpoena cautiously served attachment against the plaint 96 Suit for Hay c. not worth 40 s. dismissed 103 Suit for poor under 40 s. per annum retained 103.107 T. TEnant right fines how paid 6 Things left to the conscience of the party 12 Tenant of the land uncertaine a Subpoena 16 Tenants in common to know the certainty 16 Turning of water courses 26 Two contend for a tenant the Tenant paying his rent in court 46 The server of a Subpoena payeth costs 64 Trustee to convey the Lands according to the trust 67 Two joyntenants the one dies the other to make estate 81 Two executors exhibit two Bills answer one the other dismissed 88 U. VOyd limitation del Lease in volunt 9 Uses of Gavelkind land 11 Vendee against one appointed to sell him Land 14 Variance in a Bill of revivor from the first Bill disallowed 55 W. WArranty Collaterall no remedy 5 Wager of Law no help 5 Where remedy at Law no help here 15 Waste holpen here and no remedy at Law 19 Waste forbidden here and not punishable at Law 26 Witnesses ad informandum conscientiam 27 Witnesse served to testifie pressed for a Souldier 41 Writ of priviledge granted to a Sutor 43 44 Witnesses examined before answer 48 Witnesses examined by fraud suppressed 56 Witnesses taken after publication ad informand conscien 58 Wife after the death of her husband sueth a Bill of revivor 70 Witnesses that answer insufficiently againe examined 81 Witnesses examined in perpetuall memory moved to use their testimony 88 Witnesses examined before the Towne Clarke of York suppressed 91 Witnesses examined 1. and 2. P. and Mary ordered to prefer a Bill for publication 94 Witnesse not able to travell discharged 99 Writ of priviledge disallowed 102 Reports in Chancery IF a man be bound in a penalty to pay money at a day and place by obligation and intending to pay the same is robbed by the way or hath intreated by word some further respite at the hands of the Obligee or commeth short of the place by any misfortune and so failing of the payment doth neverthelesse provide and tender the money in short time after in these and many such like cases the Chancery will compell the Obligee to take his principall with some reasonable consideration of his dammages quantum expediat for if this was not men would doe that by covenant whiâ—h they do now by bond The like favour is extendable against them that will take advantage upon any strict condition for undoing the estate of another in lands upon a small or trifling default So if two be joyntly and severally bound to pay money and the obligee will give longer day or other favour to the one and then will sue the other for the debt he which is sued shall sue in Chancery 9. E. 4.41 A man payeth debt upon a single obligation without taking acquittance therefore this will not discharge him at the common Law but he shall be relieved therein in Chancery quare 22. F. 4.6 By the parties oath but not by witnesse If a man fell Trees upon the Lands of a Lessee for life and the Lessee recovereth dammages amounting to the treble value that he ought to answer to his Leasor in waste and the Leasor dyeth before any recovery in waste now the Leassee shall not be suffered to take those damages himselfe being so discharged of them but shall be restrained in Chancery Doctor and Student 33.34 and 40. If the obligee have received the most part of the money payable upon the obligation at the peremptory time and place and will neverthelesse extend the whole forfeiture immediately refusing soone after the default to accept of the residue tendered unto him the obligor may find
hath the deed shall be compelled here to shew it for the defence of the others Title 9. E. 4.41 A. made a Deed of Feoffment to his own use to B. but gave no livery of seizin A. dyeth C. his heire bringeth a Subpoena against B. but by Morton Master of the Rolls C. was denyed help here because B. had nothing in the Land and if he abate there is remedy at the common Law against him 18. E. 4.13 Where certainty wanteth the common Law faileth but yet help is to be found in Chancery for it for if the Queen grant to me the goods of A. that is attainted of Felony and I know not the certainty of them yet shall I compell any man to whose possession any of them be come to make Inventory of them here 36. H. 6.26 Cur. It is most usuall in Chancery to demand evidence concerning the complainants Lands to which he maketh Title which are not in Châ—sts Baggs or Boxes and whereof he knoweth not the Date c. And in that Case the Defendant made Title to the Lands and justified the detaining of the evidences for maintenance of his right whereupon it was ordered that the complainant should bring an action for the Land at the common Law to which the Defendant should plead in chiefe and that he for whom the verdict should passe should also have his possession stalled here 28. Eliz. If a man have cause to demand land by action and knoweth not the Tenant of the land by reason of the making of secret Estates it hath been lately used to draw them in by oath to confesse the Tenant but it is now doubted A Tenant in common of a Manor for long time occupyed wholly by the other Tenant in common which knoweth not the quantity of the Mannor by reason the other hath also sold Lands intermingled had the sight of the Court Rolls and Writings of his companion concerning onely the quantity of the Mannor but not concerning the sold Lands nor his Title to the Mannor and the other was ordered also to shew the like on his part Capell and Mym 1599. The Chancery also giveth help for perfecting of things well meant and upon good consideration As if in a Feoffment of Lands for money the word Heires be omitted in the deed Audeley Chancellor 9. H. 8. said that he would supply it A man bought debts due upon Obligations and gave his own Obligation for the money to be paid for them and because he had not quod pro quo but onely things in action and the seller would not use action upon them for the benefit of the Vendee It was ordered here by the assent of the Judges thereto called that the Vendor should bring in the Obligation to be cancelled 37. H. 6.14 But if a man pay money upon an Obligation or a Statute that is single the Obligee or Counsee shall not be called hither to cancell it though the other had no acquittance upon the payment made 22. E. 4. b. les Justices and Doctor and Student 23. who said that a man shall have no ayde here to supply his folly As if he pay a debt upon a single Obligation or Statute without taking acquittance But Robert Stillington Episcopus Bathoum said that deus est proâ—urator futurus I thinke if money be paid upon a redemption of a morgage by Indenture without taking an acquittance the morgage shall bring in the Indenture to be cancelled here So if a man sell lands in two Counties for money and maketh livery in the one onely he shall be compelled in conscience to perfect the assurance by another livery Doctor and Student 37. for the contract faileth onely in a circumstance or ceremony A lease is made of a House and Woods wherein it is covenanted thâ—t the Leassee shall have Housboot and Fireboot By this it is implyed and meant that he shall not have any of the Woods to any other purpose but that they belong to the Lessor and it is usuall to help him in the Chancery to them leaving sufficient for these boots A Messuage was demised cum pertinentiis onely but for that sundry Lands had been occupyed therewith for the same rent and by the same words the Lord Chancellor Bromley by advice of the Judges ordered those Lands should now passe also yet in Law they do not passe as some Justices hold The Lord North demised a Mannor excepting the Court Baron and perquisites c. the exception was found void in Law and the Tenant Lady Dacres would not make suite to the Court kept by the Lord North But the Lord Keeper Puckering assisted with some Judges decreed her to make suite for that it was plainly so intended A man made a gift of his goods of intent to defraud his creditors and yet continued the possession of them and took sanctuary and dyed there now his Executors having the goods were charged towards the Creditors 16. E. 4.9 So if a Lessee for years demiseth parcell of the Terme to another and covenously forfeiteth his whole Lease for any condition broken and taketh the Land back in Lease againe his Lessee shall find help in Chancery Crompton 64.65 And Stillington the Chancellor 8. E. 4.4 was of opinion that pro laesione fidei or breach of promise a man was at liberty to sue either in the spirituall Court Canonicae Injuria or else in the Chancery for the damage accrewed by the breach A man had Lands of ancient deâ—neasne in extent for debt and they were recovered from him by the sufferance of the Vouchee whereby he was ousted in this Case he shall be holpen here Morton Chancellor per Assent Bryan and Hussey Justices 7. H. 7.11 If one that is bound with another for the debt of the other payeth it at the day for fear of Arrest now if he sue his counter-bond which he hath to save him harmelesse non est damnificatus is a good Plea at the common Law against it but yet the Chancery will give order for his repayment Mich. 31.32 Eliz. And whereas such a surety paid the debt and sued the principal upon his Obligation to save him harmlesse the principall brought a Subpoena and alleadging that he having delivered goods into the hands of the surety to save him harmlesse prayed an Injunction to stay his suite but because the surety made another title to the goods the Court would not stay the suit for him 16. E. 4.9 Where Deeds and Mynuments do concern as well the defence of the Tenant for life his Title who also possesseth the Deeds as the right of another in reversion or remainder it is usuall to have them brought into this Court for the avoyding all perils and the indifferent custody of them Dixies and Hillary 40. Eliz. A Lease is made for life the remainder for life the remainder over in Fee the first
Lessee maketh waste and because he in the Fee hath no remedy by the common Law and waste is a wrong prohibited he shall be holpen in Chancery Crompton 48.6 And not every barre or stopell in Law ought also to bind in Chancery For if a legitimate daughter and her sister a Bastard do joyne in suing of their livery this ought not to barre in conscience howsoever it may estop in Law Doctor and Student 34. It is usuall in a Bill of Chancery ro object that the Case hath proper help at the common Law and 21. H. 7.41 where one assumed for 10 l. to Lands to another It was said he might have action upon his Case and not to sue in Chancery to compell him to make the Estate but these helps be divers and not the same for by the one he seeketh the Land and by the other he demandeth damages onely And therefore I see not but that the Petition in Parliament might have prevailed if it had stood upon that point onely and at this day it is taken for a good cause of dismission in most causes to say that he hath remedy at the common Law and where an action upon the Case for a Nusans and damages onely are to be recovered the party may have help here to remove or restore the thing it selfe quod est idem A Leassed lands for 21. years and let other lands at twill to B. that had lands in the same Town who makes a Lease for life to C. of his own lands and of A s. and then by Fine all is conveyed to B. he payes the rent to A. still the five years passe by the opinion of all the Judges delivered to the Lord Keeper this fine shall not Bar A. quia apparet per le payment del rent and cest case fit subscribe per Popham Andersan 12. Feb. 160 1.40 Eliz. Nota que Executor non poit estre a trust unlesse he have an especiall gift in the will and that may then be in trust otherwise the generall trust of an Executor is to pay debts and legacies and of the surplusage to account to the ordinary in pios usus 44. Eliz. 8. Iunii 1602. A woman sole takes consideration for making a Lease for 21. yeares and then marries and she and her husband made the promissed Lease at the 21. yeares end the Lessee surrenders and takes a new Lease for 21 years more the husband dyes the wife oustes the Lessee who sues in Chancery to have the first Lease continued rest for the first 21 yeares and not remedyed here the surrender being voluntary 44. Eliz. Two Joynt-Tenants the one takes the whole profits no remedy for the other except it were done by agreement or promise of account 8. Iunii 1602. 44. Eliz. A defeÌ„ not being a principall defendant might be read at a witnesse if he were examined on the plaintants party in another suit betweene other persons in Case of Kingston upon Thames 10. Iunii 1602. 44. Eliz. A custome of discent in a Mannor and many other things were in controversie between the Lord and Tenants and between the Tenants themselves And in the tenth Eliz. a generall agreement made by Deed indented and a Bill in Chancery for establishing the same but no Record to be found but the Deed inrolled though all the Tenants of the said Mannor shall be stopped in the Chancery to speak against this Cac est quae le Repes del realme notwithstanding pretence was made Philips being of councell with the defendants that agreement cannot alter a custome in Law that some were infants some â—eme coverts at the time that the Lord was but Tenant in taile of which opinion was Mr. Cooke Attorney generall and Justice Gawdy 10. Iunii 1602. 44. Eliz. If a Statute be acknowledged in my name by a stranger I shall have an action of disceat against him but I shall not avoid the Statute or recognizance but if it be acknowledged by one of the same name with me I shall avoyd it by Plea 23. Iunii 1602. 44. Eliz. The opinion of the Courts is that uses may be raised by covenant for Jointures but power to make Leasses in that sort cannot passe but it may be done by Fine or transmutation of possession if the covenant be that the owner will stand seize to those uses 27. Iun. 1602. 45. Eliz. Whether Copyholders may be intailed and held that they may not by the Statute de donis conditionalibus but by the common law denante and that surrenders or plaints in nature of fines and recoveries may bar these state tayles as well in the Court Baron as at the common law if the custome have been such which is the rule in these cases 3. Feb. 1602. 45. Eliz. Administrators in nature of a guardian to an infant being Executor exhibits on his behalfe a Bill in Chancery the infant depending the suit comes of full age this abates not the Bill by the opinion of the Lord Chancellor Egerton 7 Feb. 1602. 45. Eliz. Doctor Ford by his will devised certaine lands to his wife in these words non per viam fidei coÌ„missâ—â— for which his sonne might sue her but hoping if his Son grew thrifty that at her death she would leave the remnant of these Leases to him she married Greysill but before marriage Greysill wrote unto her that she should have the disposing of those Leases at her death after the marriage Greysill sells the Leases Ford brings his suite in Chancery and had no help by the opinion of the Court 31. Maii 1. Iacob 1603. Inter Tomley and Clench It appeared by testimony of ancient witnesses speaking of 60 years before and account Books and other writings that Francis Vaughan from whom Tomley claimed was mulier and Anthony from whom Clench claimeth was a Bastard and the possession had gone with Tomley 50 yeeres In this Case the Lord Egerton not onely decreed the possession with Tomley but ordered also that Clench should not have any tryall at the common law for his right till he had shewed better matter in the Chancery being a thing so long past it rested not properly in notice de pais but to be discerned by Books and Deeds of which the Court was better able to judge then a Jury of Plough-men notwithstanding that exceptions were alleadged against those ancient writings and that for the copyhold-Copyhold-land the verdict went with Clench upon evidence given three dayes before Serjeant Williams that Anthony was Mulier 31. Maii. 1. Iacob 1603. Sir Edmond Morgan married the widdow of Fortescuhe had his wives lands distrained alone by the Grantee of a rent-charge from her former Husband and therefore sued the Grantee in Chancery to take a ratable part of the rent according to the lands he held subject to the distresse and notwithstanding the Lord chiefe Justice Pophams Report who thought this reasonable the Lord Chancellor
the Subpoena therefore he is committed to the Prison of the Fleet Bernard Richers plaintant Tho. Stilman defendant An. 1. Eliz. fo. 249. The defendant was served with a Subpoena the day of the return and for his not appearance an Attachment was awarded against him and upon oath that he was served sixscore miles of so as hee could by no possibility appeare therefore a Commission is awarded to take their Answers in the Countrey paying the plaintant 6 s. 8 p for his costs Henry George plaintant Henry Bolington and Ioane Deane defendants fol. 255. An Injunction is granted to discharge an execution by Elegit taken by the defendant out of this Court for that he being served with a Subpoena did not appear William Hobby plaintant Francis Kemp defendant Anno 1. Eliz. 274. The plaintant served one Rolfe with a Subpoena ad testificandum and after he was served before he could be examined Rolfe was pressed for a Souldier upon oath made hereof Attachment was stayed Richard Humble and Anne his wife plaintants William Malbe defendant Anno Eliz. fol. 3. The plaintant sets forth by his Bill that where there was a suit depending in the Dutchie court between the defendant and Christopher Aschugh his brother for certaine Lands It was agreed and the plaintant was bound to the defendat in 100 l. that the said Christopher should become bound by Obligation in the sum of 100 l. the tenth day of Iune following and should then also make unto him a release and the defendant was also bound by Obligation in 50 l. to pay the said Christopher a sum of money the 9. of Iune in the Parish Church of Daâ—e And because both the dayes of performance of the conditions of the said severall Obligations were so neer together therefore it was agreed that when the defendant paid his money the said Christopher should make his Bond and release and sheweth that the 9. day of Iune the defendant came not himselfe but sent his servant to pay the money and Christopher was there ready to make the bond release to the defendant and offered to deliver the same to the defendants servants but they refused to accept thereof and afterward the said Christopher offered the same to the defendant but he likewise refused to receive the same and yet puts the plaintants bond of 100 l. in suite in the Kings Bench hereupon an Injunction is granted with a clause si ita sit to stay all further prosecution of any action in any the Queenes Courts at the common law or else where upon the bond of 100 l. against the plaintant and also the taking of any Nisi prius or Judgement or execution upon Judgement if Judgement be already given upon the same Bond untill the defendant have made a perfect Answer and the Court take other order Aschughe plaintant Skelton defendant Anno 2. Eliz. fol. 9. and 12. A Commission is awarded to Thomas Ward one of the examinors of this court of Chanceâ—y for the examining of witnesses in perpetuall memory in which Commission the defendants may examine if they thinke good Barentine plaintant Harbert and Alice defendants Anno 2. Eliz. fol. 46. The defendant was bound by Recognizance to the Chamberlaine of London for payment of divers sums of money for Orphanâ— portions and departed out of the City and dwelt in Oxford shire leaving no Estate behinde him in the City so as the processe of the City cannot take hold therefore a subpoena is granted against him upon pain of 100 l. to appeare before the Major and Aldermen and to stand to their Order Major and Aldermen of London plaintants Iohn Dormer defendant Anno 2. Eliz. fol. 5. Afterwards fol. 67. ordered if he doe not appeare an Attachment is granted Sr Humphrey Brown Knight one of the Judges of the common Pleas is plaintant against the defendant and an order is made for bringing in and delivery into the court of certaine evidences Sir Humphrey Browne Knight plaintant Thomas Smith defendant Anno 2. Eliz. fol. 53. Nota that dismissions were entred at large Anno. 2. Eliz. fol. 55. and fol. 56. A decree was entred at large in the Registers Booke which be the first I finde entred at large in that kind and so after divers others The defendant appeared upon a Subpaena and answered the plaintants Bill and after attended upon the Lord Keeper for a matter in controversie between him and one Ellin Wâ—yne and in the meane time being arrested in London at the suite of one Anthony Brisket contrary to the order and priviledge of this court it is therefore ordered that a Subpoena of priviledge be granted to the Major and Sheriffes of London for the discharge of the said arrest Rich. Dutton plaint Will. Alersey defend An. 2. Eliz. f. 58. Forasmuch as Thomas Harbert Sheriffe of Monmouthshire hath returned non est inventus upon an Attachment awarded against Roger Williams who is a Justice of Peace and as is informed was at the last quarter Sessions holden for the same County therefore the Sheriffe is amercyed five pound Sir Thomas Stradling Knight plaintant William Earl of Pembrooke defendant An. 2. Eliz. fol. 84. The Defendants Attorney at Law was enjoyned to stay his proceedings at Law against the plaintant in an action of trespasse And notwithstanding this the defendant himselfe proceeded and got Judgement and took out alevari facias against the plaintant and an Injunction was granted against the defendant himselfe to stay the execution of the same Writ of levari facias or if he had executed it and levyed the dammage and costs that then he should bring all the money thereupon received into the Court of Chancery in Crastina Ascensionis Domini to be disposed of as the Court shall think fit and yet notwithstanding himselfe should be then present in Court to answer the contempt Iohn Segewick plaintant William Redman defend An. 2. Eliz. fol. 92. The Defendant was in possession at the time of the Bill exhibited and the plaintant entred upon him after the Bill therefore an Injunction for the defendant against the plaintant William Dowche plaintant Iohn Perrot defendant An. 2. Eliz. fol. 99. An Injunction was granted against the defend upon paine of 100 l. that he should not prosecute an Action of debt of 5 l. or any writ of Nisi prius Jury Judgement or execution of Judgement if Judgement be given before the Justices of either Bench untill speciall licence be given by this Court Thomas Stanebridge plaintant Thomas Hales defendant An. 1. Eliz. fol. 103. Forasmuch as it is informed the tryall of the truth of the matter resteth altogether in the Declaration of the defendant it is therefore ordered that the defendant shall be examined upon interrogatories to be ministred by the plaintant upon whose examination if the matter fall not out for the plaintant then the plaintaint to pay the defendant costs and
the cause to be dismissed Iohn Fyfield plaintant Iohn Vinore and Alice defendants An. 2. Eliz. fol. 122. The plaintant at the day appointed for hearing appeared not therefore the defendant is dismissed with costs Richard Fincham plaintant William Backwood defendant An. 2. Eliz. f. 125. The defendant notwithstanding an Injunction delivered unto him got a Judgement upon an action of debt in the common Pleas and decreed upon the hearing of the cause that the defendant shall within 14. dayes next after the decree resort to the Record in the common Pleas whereupon the said judgement is entered and there to confesse of record a full satisfaction of the said Judgement Nota the action of debt in the common Pleas was for not delivering to the defendant a Statute which by the depositions of witnesses appeared to be delivered and by the Clarke of the Staples cerficate the record was discharged Nicholas Colverwell plaintant Ralph Bongey defendant Anno 2. Eliz. fol. 126. It is decreed the plaintant his heires and assignes and his or their Farmors of the said Farme or Tenement called Stubles shall from henceforth hold and enjoy as appendant to the same Farme or Tenement called Stubles all the same Fould course or common of pasture for the full number of 300 sheep within the said fields of Wentforth alias Wentford Basill Fielding and Alice plaintants Thomas Wren defendant Anno 2. Eliz. fol. 137. and 155. The plaintant exhibited his Bill thereby shewing that there is question and controversie between two defendants for the reversion of the Mannor of Aldwell which he holdeth for yeares by Lease made thereof to him by one Anthony Marmyon and that he doth not know to which of them the rent and reversion is due and therefore desireth that upon payment of his rent into this court according to the Covenants and articles of his lease he may be discharged saved harmelesse from molestation suite and trouble for the same rents by the defendants or either of them wherefore it is ordered an Injunction be awarded against the defendants not to molest the plaintant for his said rent during the said contention so as the plaintant pay his rent into this Court Iohn Alnete plaintant Christopher Bettam and Edmond Marmyon defendants Anno 2. Eliz. fol. 141. Upon hearing of the matter three witnesses examined by Commission did in open court depose that the commissioners have set downe their depositions otherwise then they did depose therefore it is ordered those depositions shall be void and the same witnesses shall be examined again Iohn Peacock plaintant Edward Collens defendant Anno 2. Eliz. fol. 146. For that the Court was credibly informed the plaintant was in peaceable possession at the time of the Bill exhibited and three yeares before an Injunction is awarded Iohn Sapcote plaintant William Newport defendant Anno 2. Eliz. fol. 173. The suite was concerning the custome of Tenant right for Lands in Dent in the County of Yorke and for that both parties confessed that Justice Dallison and Serjeant Rastall Justices of Assizes in that County had made an award in the cause between the parties therefore it was decreed that both parties should performe it and an Injunction is granted to either party against the other for that purpose and where an Injunction was the last Terme granted against the defendant for stay of execution upon a Judgement in the common Pleas it is ordered the said Injunction shall stand in force and the defendant shall obey the same and the defendant shall answer the plaintants Bill William Burtet and Alice plaintants William Redman defendant An. 2. Eliz. fol. 174. It is ordereâ— the Injunction formerly granted the defendant for stay of his action in the Kings Bench be dissolved and the defendant to be at liberty to take Judgement upon his action of bebt of 500 l. Provided if the plaintant doe bring into court on Munday next 223 l. then execution for the rest is to be suspended untill this Court take other order Thomas Stanebridge plaintant Thomas Hales defendant An. 2. Eliz. fol. 176. The plaintant exhibited his bill in this Court and before the defendant answered had a Commission to examine his witnesses upon pretence the witnesses were old and in danger to dye Sir Radnus Bagnold Miles plaintant Greene defendant An. 2. Eliz. fol. 178. The defendant first exhibited her Bill in this Court for land conveyed to her in joynture and evidences of the same land and after did molest the same plaintant by distresses after answer and replication put into this Court therefore an Injunction is granted Richard Kidnere plaintant Agnes Harrison defendant An. 2. Eliz. fol. 173. The plaintant setteth forth that his Father and he are joyntly seized for life of the Lordship of Barrington in the County Palatine of Durham and that the defendant sues his Father for those lands before the Chancellor of Durham and for that it was informed that the plaintant dwelleth in Ratcliffe in the County of Middlesex and that the plaintants Father is an old diseased man and not able to follow his suite therefore a Certiorare is granted directed to the Chancellor of Durham to certifie into this Court the whole matter depending before him William Hilton and Alice plaintants Râ—â—â—rt Lawson and William Lawson defendants Anno 2. Eliz. fol. 200 l. The plaintant being sonne and heire to his Father who dyed intestate entred into the house whereof his Father dyed seized in Fee and possessed himselfe of certain small parcels of goods to the value of 5 s. of his Fathers goods who dyed intestate and the defendant having an Obligation of 400 l. made by the Father unto him for performing the covenants of an Indenture sued the son as Executor to his Father who dyed intestate and upon the testimony of some witnesses that the plaintant had sold or given away the said small parcels of goods a verdict passed for the defendant for the whole 400 l. which appeared by Certificate of the Justices of Assizes and thereupon an Injunction was granted to stay Judgement and all other actions to be commenced by the defendant against the plaintant upon the same Obligation untill the matter be heard or otherwise determined by the Court Edward North plaintant George Keâ—ewich defendant Anno 2. Eliz. fol. 237. It is ordered if the defendant shew not cause on Friday next then the Injunction before granted for the defendant against the plaintant to stay his Execution in the Kings Bench shall be dissolved or else the money for which the plaintant lyeth in Execution at the defendants suite shall remaine in his hands in part of payment of such money as is due unto him by the defendant and afterwards upon Fryday because the Lord Keeper did not sit in Court to hear such cause aâ— was offered further day was given and afterwards the plaintant was left at liberty to call for Execution upon the Judgement because
the defendant shewed no cause Thomas Hales plaintant Thomas Stanebridge defendant Anno 2. Eliz. fol. 244. The defendant exhibited his Bill into the Chancery for certaine Lands and afterwards sued the plaintant in the Common Pleas for the same Lands before the matter was determined in the Chancery therefore an Injunction was awarded against the said Body to stay his proceedings in the common Pleas Robert Bill and Thomas Gifford plaintants Iohn Body defendant Anno 2. Eliz. fol. 263. The undersheriffe of Middlesex brought into this Court the body of the plaintant by commandment of the Lord Keeper in execution upon a Writ of extent of 300 l. together with the said Writ at the suite of Sir Edmund Maliverer Knight and by order of Court he was taken from the Sheriffe of Middlesex and delivered in execution to the warden of the Fleet for the 300 l. and because the defendants shewed no good cause to the contrary upon a day given them therefore it was ordered that upon Recognizance by the plaintant and good sureties to stand to the order of the Court or else to yeeld his body prisoner to the Fleet in execution and there to remaine untill the defendant be satisfied he the plaintant shall have liberty to goe at large and that the defendant shall not sue for any manner of Execution by force of the said execution Robert Rosse plaintant Christopher Lassels and Alice defendants Anno 3. Eliz. fol. 90. The plaintant had Judgement in the Kings Bench against the defendant upon a Bond of 200 l. and another Judgement for 300 l upon an action of debt of arrerages of account in the Kings Bench and ordered they may proceed with execution upon the Bond of 200 l. and also to take execution of 100 l. parcell of the 300 l. provided alwayes and it is ordered the plaintant shall not in any wise proceed nor take execution of the 200 l. residue of the 300 l recovered upon the accompt without speciall license of the Court Iohn Brooke and Katherine his wife plaintants Thomas Apprice defendant Anno 3. Eliz. fol. 233. The plaintant sheweth by his Bill that the personage of Thekelye was holden by force whereby the plaintant could not be inducted whereupon a Writ of de vilaica removenda was awarded out of this Court and thereby the plaintant put in possession by the Sheriffe neverthelesse the defendant keepeth the possession of the said house appertaining to the personage and for that the plaintant is bound to pay his first fruits to the Queenes Majesty therefore an Injunction is granted against him Thomas Boult Clerk plaintant Sir George Blunt Miles and Alice defendants An. 3. Eliz. fol. 262. The plaintant made Title to the lands by a Lease paroll made by the defendant unto him whereupon he did sow the ground with Corne and the defendant entred upon him therefore the plaintant had an Injunction for the Corne Thomas Harrison plaintant Richard Chomeley Miles and Alice defendants An. 3. Eliz. for three hundred pound It is decreed the desendant and his Heires shall from time to time yearly pay to the plaintant and his heires Lords of the Mannor of Knebworth the rent of 3 s. 4 d. for the peece of ground called the Hawâ—e together with the arrerages thereof since the 6. of Ed. the 6 And shall from henceforth doe suite and service to the Court of the plaintant and his Heirs owners of the said Mannor and the plaintant and his Heires shall have and receive the fines and amercyaments presentable in the Court of the Mannor for any trespasse or lack of service done by the Tenants of the said Hawte Richard Litton plaintant Iohn Couper defendant An. 6. Eliz fol. 145. It is Ordered a Subpoena be awarded against the defendant to be examined upon interrogatories whether before his Answer he had knowledge that the plaintant was marryed and would take no advantage of the same marriage in his Answer then the matter to proceed without Bill of revivor Christian Fairefield plaintant Robert Greenfield defendant An. 6. Eliz. fol. 150. The question of the case drawn was whether the advowson in question did passe by the livery made in the view of the Church without deed or not the Church being full of an incumbent and resolved by the Lord chiefe Justice of the Kings Bench and Justice Manwood to whom the same was referred that the Advowson could not passe by that livery Pannell plaintant Hodgson alias Hodson defendant Anno 18. and 19. Eliz. A Subpoena Ducens tecum was awarded against the defendant to bring in certaine deeds and to shew cause why the same should not be delivered to the plaintant the defendant by his councell shewed that the Morgage was upon condition for payment of 40 l. at a day and before the day the Morgager sold the same over to the plaintant and delivered the Estate by livery and seizin whereby the condition was extinct and yet the defendant offered to give for the same 100 l. It is ordered that the evidences be delivered to the Usher of the Court but not to the plaintant without speciall order Wilford plaintant Denny defendant Anno 18. and 19. Eliz. The plaintant exhibited his Bill to be releived for a promise supposed to be made by the Lady Lutterell for a Lease of certaine lands and for stopping certaine wayes the defendant had a Commission to take her answer and demmurred for that the plaintant may have his remedy by Law which cause seemes insufficient and not to be allowed of and the rather for that the defendants having a Commission to take their answers in the Coâ—ntry did demurre therefore a Subpoena is awarded against them to make a better answer Stukly plaintant the Lady Lutterell Aliis defendants An. 18. and 19. Eliz. Stephen Smith made oath that he was present when one Iohn Maddock made these persons hereafter named privy to a Writ of execution upon a decree made for the plaintant viz. Iohn Ward Iohn Priddoâ—k Henry Pinly Lawrence Banks Iohn Kiddermaster and William Tuttle And the said Maddocks left the same Writ with one Thomas Smith from whom the defendant confesseth the receipt of the said Writ which said parties have not performed the said decree therefore an attachment is awarded against them Leake plaintant Marrow defendant An. 18. and 19. Eliz. The Bill is against the defendants as Executors to their Father who in his life time being Gardian in Soccage to the plaintant in right of the plaintants mother whom he married for and concerning profits by him taken of the lands of the plaintant during his minority for fines of Leases Woodsales and wilfull decay of houses and doth aâ—er assets sufficient to become to their hands the defendants demurre because not privy nor chargeable by Law but ordered to answer Burgh plaintant Wentworth defendant Anno 18. and 19 Eliz. Thomas Stapleâ—on made oath that he delivered
sollicitor of one of the parties was served with Subpoena to testifie in the cause in controversie and the Court discharged him by reason he was solliciter in the cause An. 20. Eliz. The plaintants Bill was for that he being a Coppyholder Leased to the defendant for years and the defendant hath digged gravell and sold the same away whereby the Coppyhold is prejudiced the defendant justified for that the Copyholders are not punishable in waste which cause this Court alloweth not of for though the Copyholders of the mannor are not punishable yet the Leasses of Copyholders of the Mannor are punishable therefore a Supoena is awarded to shew cause why an Injunction shall not be granted for staying his digging of gravell and felling Woods upon the Copyhold Lands Dalton plaintant Gill and Pindor defendants Anno 19. Eliz. Whereas the plaintant exhibited his Bill against the defendant for wilfull perjury the defendant hath demurred which this Court alloweth not of It is ordered a Subpoena be awarded to the defendant to answer Thomas Woodcock plaintant Giles Woodcock defendant An. 19. Eliz. Whereas there was an award in writing exhibited into this Court made between the said parties by Sir Christopher Wray Knight Lord chiefe Justice of England whereunto the Lord chiefe Justice hand as well as the parties are subscribed it was requested by the plaintants the same might be decreed by this Court which this Court refused to grant untill the defendants were made privy therefore processe is awarded Wakefield Vxor Aliis plaintants Hawson Vxor Aliis defendants An. 19. Eliz. The suit was to stay suit in the spirituall Court for a Legacy of 40 l. Ioan Banvill widdow plaintant Guy Banvill defendant Anno 19. Eliz. The suite was for common of pasture and Turbary the defendant demurred for that the plaintant may have remedy at the common law but ordered to answer Lawrence and Moregate Aliis plaintants Windham defendant An. 19. Eliz. Robert Goodwine made oath that at such time as he came to the house of the defendant to serve a Subpoena upon him according to an order of the 10. of May last one of his servants came forth and told him he was within who thereupon delivered the Writ to be delivered to the defendant his Master Goodwine plaintant Sullyard defendant An. 19. Eliz. The defendant made oath that he was served with a Subpoena by the plaintant in the name of one William Web utterly unknown to the defendant and now upon his appearance no Bill in Court against the defendant in the name of the said William Web or of the plaintant therefore 30 s. cost is awarded against the plaintants An. 19. Eliz. Forasmuch as the said Abel one of the defendants appeared and answered the last Terme and his wife did not therefore an Attachment was awarded against them both Monox plaintant Abel and his wife defendants Anno 19. Eliz. Whereas there was this present day exhibited into this Court a certificate under the Seale of the university of Oxford on the defendants behalfe testifying and declaring that the Chancellors of the said university and their successors from the time whereof the memory of man is not to the contrary as well by graunt and consideration of her Majesty as of her Majesties noble progenitors sometimes Kings of this Realme have had the cognizance and finall determination of all manner of Pleas strifes quarrels and controversies whatsoever Felony Maine and Franketenant onely excepted rising and growing as well within the precinct of the said City of Oxford as without within the Realme of England whereas one of the parties within the said suit action or plea is a Master or Schollor or common Minister of the same university or such a person as the Chancellor Vicechancellor Lieutenant or Commissary will certifie ought to enjoy the priviledge of the same university and that the same persons upon the shewing forth of the said certificate in any Court where they are impleaded ought to be discharged out of the same Court forasmuch as it appeareth by the said certificate that the said defendant who is brought up by a Subpoena to answer a Bill exhibited by the plaintant into this Court is a Batchelor of Law in the same university and for that also it appeareth by the plaintants said Bill of complaint that the matter therein contained is onely for certaine promises supposed to be made by the defendant to the plaintant touching certaine Goods Chattels and money therein mentioned and not Franktenement or any matter before excepted It is therefore ordered that the said defendant be of and from the said Bill of complant and matters therein contained from henceforth clearly and absolutely dismissed and the plaintant referred to take his remedy for the same before the Chancellor Vicechancellor Lieutenant or Commissary of the said University of Oxford according to the Tenor of the said Certificate Temple plaintant Foster Doctor of the Civill Law defen. Anno 19. Eliz. Thomas plaintant Mounson defendant produceth a Certificate of the University claiming jurisdiction of the same University therefore the cause is from hence dismissed to be tryed and determined there An. 19. Eliz. The plaintant in the end of Easter Terme by Master Griffeth his Attorney required the defendant to proceed to Commission for examining of witnesses and the defendant was ready to joyne sithence which time the plaintant contrary to the order of this Court as they alleage hath produced one of the Masters of this Court and one of the examinors to travell to the plaintants house in Wiltshire 60 miles distant from London there hath examined witnesses it is ordered that publication be stayed untill the matter be examined after publication is granted Darrall plaintant and Stukey defendant An. 19. Eliz. The plaint Father did purchase in Fee-Farm to him and his heirs the Mannor of Long Eason in the County of Deâ—y of one Kymwelmarch rendring 8 l. rent with a condition of reentry for non payment of the rent deviseth the Land to another for life A ducens tecum for the evidences An. 19. Eliz. Forasmuch as the defendant hath appeared in this court upon an Attachment of priviledge and attended from day to day according to his Bond made in that behalfe and hath also pleaded an issue to the plaintants Declaration therefore the defendant is licensed to depart Dugdell plaint Orrell defend An. 20. Eliz. The defend by his Answer confesseth he was joynt purchasor in trust with the plaintants Father to them two and to the heires of the plaintants Father of the Lands in question and that he never received any profits thereof and that he meant at the plaintants full age to convey the Lands to the plaintant and his heires according to the trust it is ordered and decreed the defendant shall forthwith upon notice to him given convey his Estate in the Lands to the plaintant and the Heires
releived upon a bond after Judgement and execution and because no material matter alleadged for maintainanâ—e thereof therefore dismissed Adams plaintant Doddesworth defendant Anno 21. and 22. Eliz. The Bill was to be releived for egresse and regresse into a garden of the defendants for drying of cloaths promissed by word only by the defendant to the plainant therefore dismissed for that the Court ought not to be burthened with such small maâ—ers Hamby plaintant Northage defendant Anno 21. and 22. Eliz. Guilliam made oath that he saw a subpoena served on the defendanr who hath not appeared therefore an attachment Morgan plaintant Evon defendant Anno 21. and 22. Eliz. An Attachment was delivered to the Sheriffe to execute who did not returne the same and upon affidavit of the delivery a day was given to returne the Writ upon paine to be amerced 5 l. Crompton plaintant Meridith defendant Anno 21. and 22. Eâ—iz Affidavit made for the delivery of au extent to the Sheriffe which he hath not returned therefore a day is given to the Sheriffe to returne the Writ upon paine of 10 l. Hambey plaintant Wight defendant Anno 21. and 22. Eliz. Three Bonds put in suite in the Kings Bench and stayed by Injunction by Order because the Queene was hindered of her fine Pascall plaintant Smith Miles defendant Anno 21. and 22. Eliz. Calveley plaintant Philips defendant Bonds put in suite in the K. Bench stayed by Injunction because the Queene was hindered of her fine Anno 21. and 22. Eliz. The Bill prayeth reliefe against the defendant as brother and Heire for that the plaintant paid to his brother deceased a fine of 34 l. for a lease who dyed before the same was made and therefore desireth either to have the Lease made by the Heire or his money againe thereupon it is ordered the defendant shall answer an Injunction Kreme Alias Mogge plaintant Meere defendant Anno 21. and 22. Eliz. The defendant got costs for want of a Bill and bespake of Robert Bayles a Clerk a Subpoena for those costs who made her a Subpoena ad sectam whereupon the plaintant got costs this being moved for discharge of these costs so gotten by default of the Clark It is ordered that the defendant shall be discharged and the plaintant also of the costs gotten by the defendant and neither of them should have processe against the other for the same but the defendant might take a Subpoena against the Clark that made the erronious processe for the 40 s. costs which she should have had against the plaintant Franckblanck plaintant Domina Metham defend An. 21. and 22. Eliz. Oath is made for the delivery of a Subpoena to the wife of the defendant at his house who hath not appeared therefore an Attachment Pilgrime plaintant Read defendant Anno 21. and 22. Eliz. The plaintant desireth to be relieved against an Obligation of 100 l. which had an intricate and insensible condition put in suit for that the plaintant being desired by the defendant to Seale a release desired onely time to be advised thereof which the defendant would not yeeld unto but hath put the bond in suit though no wayes damnified and now the plaintant is ready to Seale the release therefore an Injunction is granted Rowles plaintant and Rowles defendant An. 21. and 22. Eliz. The defendant took out a Commission to take his answer in the Country and thereby answered he could not directly answer without sight of evidences which are in Nottinghamshire far distant from Dorsetshire the defendant afterwards made a perfect answer and yet the plaintant took out Attachment and Attachment with Proclamation both which were discharged paying the ordinary Fees and 2 s. 6 d. to the Warden of the Fleet Trussell aliis plaintants Willoughby Miles defendant Anno 21. and 22. Eliz. Iohn Cotten the plaintant brother devised divers goods to his two Sons to be delivered at their full age and made the plaintant and defendant Executors 100 l. of the goods came to the plaintants hands 250 l. came to the defendants hands The plaintant desireth by his Bill that in respect of the trust and joynt charge which may survive that the plaintant and defendant may each be bound to the other to pay the children their Portions in their hands at their full age and if either plaintant or defendant dye before then the Executor shall pay that which was in the testators hands to the survivor which this Court thought in conscience to be meet because the defendant by answer confesseth the trust and receit of 250 l. Therefore a Subpoena is awarded against the defend to shew cause why it should not be decreed Cotton plaintant Causton defend Anno 21. and 22. Eliz. An Attachment and other processe of contempt issued out of this Court for not returning the defendants answer by Commission is discharged paying the ordinary Fees because the plaintant named one Commissioner who refused to joyne with one of the defendants Commissioners in taking the defendants answer and a new Commission is granted to indifferent Commissioners named by the defendant Marshall plaintant Harwood defendant An 21. and 22. Eliz. It is moved that where a prohibition was six moneths since granted for stay of a suite in the Ecclesiasticall Court at Herford upon surmise the lands are held in Capite whereas it appeared by Letters Patents thereof the lands holden of Eastgreenwich therefore consultation unlesse cause shewed and the party to pay double costs according to the Statute whereby the prohibition is granted Wolfe plaintant Merrick Clums defendant An. Forasmuch as the Major of Totnes hath certified under his common Seale that the defendant made oath before him that he was served with a Billet in Paper at the plaintants suit and upon his appearance no Bill therefore costs White plaintant Carpenter defendant An. 21. and 22. Eliz. Brent an Attorney at common Law for the defendant being present in Court is enjoyned in open Court upon paine of 200 l. not to proceed at common Law upon an action of debt upon an Obligation against the plaintant Bishop plaintant Iessop and Wats defendants Anno 21. and 22. Eliz. Forasmuch as the said Thoroughgood made oath that the matter in the Bill is for a Portion of Rent of 10 s. by year being of small value it is dismissed Knighton plaintant Allen and Thoroughgood defendant An. 21. and 22. Eliz. Iohn Vaux made oath that he saw a Subpoena served upon the defend therefore for not appearance an Attachment is granted Vaux plaint Glasiers defendant An. 21. and 22. Eliz. Iohn Leigh made oath for the serving of a Subpoena on a witnesse to testifie on the plaintants behalfe before certaine Commissioners who hath not so done Therefore an Attachment is awarded against the defendant Middleton plaintant Speright defendant An. 21. and 22. Eliz. The plaintant made oath that he heard the
defendant against him in bringing him up by Subpoena at the suite of one Anthony Hinck whereas the plaintant never knew any such maâ— and for divers other misdemeanors used by the defendant in this Court towards the plaintant the defendant demurred for that both parties dwell within the jurisdiction of the Marches of Wales where hee supposes the plaintant is to seek his remedy which kind of demurrer this court alloweth not for that misdemeanors committed in this court are most meet to be here examined Griffeth plaintant Penrine defendant Anno 22. Eliz. The plaintant sheweth by his Bill that his house and the defendants are joyning together and supported by one main wall standing partly upon the Freehold of either of the said parties and the plaintant having also an entry Garret and other necessary roomes standing upon the Kitchin of the defendant he the defend went about to pull down the said Wall and thereby to overthrow the said Garret the defendant made title to some of the upper rooms and hath pulled down part of the Wall an Injunction is awarded to stay the defendant to pull down any more of the Wall or any other part of the said house whereby the said upper Roomes may be overthrown or impaired untill the matter be heard Bush plaintant Field defendant An. 22. Eliz. A Commission to examine witnesses on both parts upon 14. dayes warning to be given to the defendant Lucy one of the defendants made oath that neithen he nor Varney had any warning but if any warning was given it was given to Smith the other defendant who is little interessed in the cause but made a party as the defendants councell supposeth to take away his testimony from the other defendants Therefore ordered a Commission be awarded whereof the said Lucy shall have the carriage directed to the former Commissioners and 14. dayes warning shall be given to the plaintant and he to examine if he will Hollingworth plaintant Lucy Varney and Smith defendants Anno 22. Eliz. Humphrey Loyde made oath that he saw one Lewis leave a Subpoena in the Hall of the defendant and that the defendant was at home the same time who hath not appeared therefore an Attachment is awarded against the defendâ—nt Anno 22. Eliz. A Commission to examine witnesses issued but the plaintant at the place and day appointed brought not his Commissioners nor the Commission whereby the defendants Commissioners could not fit to examine but the plaintant procured certaine witnesses to be examined before one of the Town Clarkes of Yorke touching the matter in variance but ordered no witnesses so taken shall be received into this Court nor the plaintant take any benefit thereby and a new Commission is awarded Hareforth and Lowther plaintants Gates defendant Anno 22. Eliz. Iohn Davis made oath that his boy served a Subpoena upon the defendant for the which the said boy was apprehended and imprisoned in the Marches of Wales therefore an Attachment is awarded against the defendant Dastoines plaintant Apprice defendant Anno 22. Eliz. The defendant made oath that both the said parties dwell in the Jurisdiction of the Marches of Wales and that the matter of the plaintants Bill is but for a lease for yeares and no title of Freehold therefore dismissed Moore plaintant Mashall defendant Anno 22. Eliz. Iohn Lord Zouch deceased late Father to the plaintant did give the Mannor of Winford Eagle with th' appertenances in the County of Dorset intailed to the Father of the defendant reserving 40 l. a yeare rent to him and his Heires and after about three yeares last past granted 25 l. parcell of the said rent to the plaintants for their lives and the defendants Father did atturne and pay the rent to the plaintants untill about two or three yeares before his death which was about six years since sithence which time the defendant being issue in taile and seized refused to pay the said rent but ordered by this court to pay it if he shew not good cause to the contrary Zouch uxor plaintants Siddenâ—am defendant Anno 22. Eliz. The plaintant seeketh reliefe by way of contribution for that one of the defendants hath a rent charge out of this the plaintants lands and out of one other of the defendants lands and yet seeketh to lay the whole burthen of the rent charge upon his the plaintants lands and because the defend would not answer therefore an Injunction is granted for staying of the suits of the rent Dolman plaintant Vavasor aliis defendants Anno 22. Eliz. It appeareth by oath that the defendant is both senselesse and dumbe and therefore cannot instruct his Counsell to draw his answer and therefore ordered that no Attachment or other processe of contempt be awarded against the defendant for not answering without speciall order of this Court Altham plaintant Smith defendant An. 22. Eliz. The plaintant bought of the defendant the reversion of a Copyhold which he could not enjoy confessed by the defendants answer thereupon a Subpoena is awarded against the defendant to shew cause why he should not repay the money received upon the bargaine Picketon plaintant Littecote aliis defendants An. 22. Eliz. The defendants were not served with processe and yet the plaintant brought up divers witnesses to be examined but ordered they should not be examined untill the defendants have answered Episcopus Sallesbury plaintant Hinde and Hinde defendants Anno 22. Eliz. The plaintant was drawne to drinke and filled with drink spoke some words against the defendant for which he brought an action upon the case at the common Law whereupon the plaintant exhibited his Bill of complaint and got an Injunction pro non solutione Finis It is ordered that the defend paying the Queenes fine shall have liberty to proceed and the Bill to be dismissed Qui peccat ebrius luat sobrius Kendrick plaintant Hopkins defendant Anno 22. Eliz. Forasmuch as the Major of Barnestable hath certified that Iohn Barker made oath before him that he did shew and offer to deliver to the defendant a Subpoena which he would not accept and hath not appeared therefore an attachment Peris plaintant Thomas defendant Anno 22. Eliz. The plaintants made motion to have publication of witnesses taken 1. and 2. Philip and Mary betweene one Thomas Shrub then plaintant and now deceased whose daughters and Coheires the plaintants wives are and Henry Barnard then defendant now likewise deceased touching lands in the occupation of the defendant and ordered the plaintants shall exhibite a Bill for publication against the defendants and call them by the Subpoena to answer and then order shall be taken Clarke uxor Papwell uxor Stockes plaintants Eve Mellers and Wodham defendants Anno 22. Eliz. The defendant was served with a Subpoena at the suit of Hanmer and for want of a Bill got costs and the plaintant upon Affidavit that the
The matter complained of by the Bill is for 5 l. debt for Fish therefore dismissed Foord Foord plaintants Richards defendant Anno 21. Eliz. Symonds Brocebridge made oath that the said Elizabeth and Anne two of the defendants are above the age of 70. yeares a peece and that the said William was comming up to London in his company and they were both robbed and William his horse taken from him whereby hee could not come to make his appearance therefore a Commission is granted to take all the said defendants answers in the countrey Hill plaintant Elizabeth Worley widdow William Stapleton and Anne his wife defendants Anno 21. Eliz. Memorand that the 20. day of February last Sir Nicholas Bacon Knight Lord Keeper of the Great Seale of England dyed at York house and the Seale being the same day sent for by the Lord Treasurer remained with the Queenes Majesty till the 12. day of April last on which day the same was delivered to Sir Tho. Bromly Knight Lord Chancellor of England Paschae 21. Eliz. Whereby an order of the 10. of Feb. last a Subpoena was awarded against the defendant to shew cause wherefore an award therein mentioned should not be ratified Now Mr. Flowerdew of councell on the defendants behalf informeth that the said award was not made by any order of this court and therefore desired that the said defend may not be compelled to performe the same It is ordered that Councell on both sides shall attend the morrow sevennight and then order shalll be taken Barkley Miles plaintant Moore defendant Anno 21. Eliz. The plaintant exhibited his Bill as a priviledged man to Sir Francis Kempe Prothonotary of this Court for Lands lying in the County Palatine of Chester and for that it appeared by Letters Patents openle shewed in Court under her Majesties Great Seale of England that this Court by any priviledge should not hold plea of any Lands lying within the said County Palatine It is therefore ordered to be dismissed if the plaintant shew not good cause William Lomley plaintant Thomas Greene Thomas Marlow Robert Taylor and Iames Wagge defendâ—nts An. 21. Eliz. The plaintant was adjudged to pay the defen. 37 s. 6 d. costs for that he being served with Subpoena in Hillar Terme appeared and by his answer disclaimed and yet after the plaintant served him with a Subpoena to rejoyne but afterwards the same costâ— were discharged by motion for that the defendant had before the costs put in his rejoynder but upon a disclaimer no costs is to be allowed Read plaintant Hawstead alias Lane defendants Anno 21. Eliz. The defendant was taken upon a Commission of Rebellion at the plaintants suite required his costs to be allowed him the Court asking the opinion of the Clerkes it was agreed with one consent that he should have his costs allowed therefore ordered accordingly Morgan plaint Ap Iohn Gowge defendant Anno 21. Eliz. The defendant maketh oath that he was served with a Billet in paper at the plaintants suit which Billet he lost by misfortune and upon his appearance no Bill is in Court against him therefore costs is awarded Brown alias Garris alias Pawdy plaintant Stoyck defend Anno 21. Eliz. The plaintant exhibited his Bill to examine witnesses in perpetuall memory touching a lease of Lands which hee and those by whom hee claimeth hath enjoyed 40. yeares the defendant by answer claimeth the Lands as Coppy-hold of inheritance to Mr. Sowthwell who is owner of the inheritance and within age and therefore prayed that no witnesses might be examined till Mr. Southwell be of full age and yet because the witnesses being old and may dye in the interim therefore a Subpoena is awarded against the defend to shew cause why a Commission should not be granted Hearing plaintant Fisher defendant An. 21. Eliz. Iohn Budden maketh oath that the defendants confessed unto him they were served with a Subpoena at the plaintants suite and have not appeared therefore an Attachment is granted Perry Ar plaintant Gatter alias Sharde and Cole defendants An. 21. Eliz. Upon the hearing of the matter for the Mannor of Laughtor and the Advowson of the Church of Laughton in the County of Bucking it appeared that the defendants and they from whom they claimed have beene in possession 100 yeares with divers discents therefore the defendants are dismissed Kinston plaintant Pigot aliis defendants Anno 21. Eliz. The defendant in Hillar Terme made oath that he could not answer without sight of evidences in the Country and having day given him he now hath put in no answer but a demurrer contrary to the orders of this Court therefore an attachment is awarded against the defendant Farmer aliis plaintants Fox defendant Anno 21. Eliz. Iohn Harry made oath for the serving of a Subpoena on the defendants to rejoyn therefore Munday next is given to the defendants to rejoyne or else to lose the benefit thereof Ioanes aliis plaintants Whitney Miles aliis defendants An. 21. Eliz. Whereas a Commission issued out to examine witnesses on both parties which is returned executed upon oath made by Giles Brever that he served precepts from the Commissioners upon W. S. Tho. Lin T. C. and Io. Peers to be examined on the defendants behalf before the said Commissioners who appeared not it is therefore ordered that a new Commission be awarded to the former Commissioners at the defendants charge as well to examine the said four witnesses as any other Shepheard plaintant Shepheard aliis Defendants An. 21. Eliz. The Duke of Northumberland acknowledged a Recognizance of 1000 Markes to the Lord Crumwell and after granted certaine Lands to the defendant afterwards both the Duke and the Lord Cromwell were attainted of Treason whereby the Recognizance came to the Queen and in her name was put in suit by one Lane to whom her Majesty had granted the same recognizance who sought to extend the defendants said Lands alone whereas there are divers other Lands to a great valew in other mens hands lyable to the said Recognizance therefore it is ordered that no Liberate goe out upon the said extent untill the Court order the same The Queenes Majesty plaintant Colborne defendant Anno 21. Eliz. The plaintant sought to be relieved upon an Obligation of 300 l. which he entred into to make a joyneture unto his wife in consideration of 174 l. promised to him by the defendant in marriage which was never paid unto him therefore an Injunction is awarded if cause be not shewed Osborne plaintant Havers defend An. 21. Eli. The plaintant and defendant both joyned in Commission to examine witnesses and the plaintant having the carriage of the Commission did not execute the same but did examine witnesses here in Court therefore ordered the defend should have a new CoÌ„mission to the former Commissioners wherein the plaintant might also examine if he list and
to our understanding by the cause of errour and attaint in the same Statute what Jurisdiction it was that the Statute meant to restraine viz. such Jurisdiction as did assume to reverse and undoe the Judgement as error or attaint doth which the Chancery never doth but leaves the Judgement in peace and onely meddles with the corrupt conscience of the party for if the Chancery should assume to reverse the Judgement in the point adjudged it is void as appeareth 39. E. 3. f. 14. 5. We find no presidents of any proâ—ceeding to conviction or Judgement upon any indictment framed or grounded upon this Statute no more then upon the Statute of Praemunire and the â—ate Indictments are contra diversa Statuta not mentioning the particular Statutes 6. Lastly it was a great mischiefe to force the Subject in al cases to seek remedy in equity before he knew whither the Law will help him or no which oftentimes he cannot do till after judgement and therefore he is to seek his salve properly when he hath his hurt There be divers other things of weight which we have seene and considered of whereupon we have grounded our opinion but we goe no further upon that we have seene But because matters of presidents is greatly considerable in this case and that we have been attended by the Clerks of the Chancery with the presidents of that Court and have not been yet attended by any officer of the Kings Bench with any president of judgements if it shall please your Majesty faithfull report of them as we have done of the other all which c. Francis Bacon Hen. Mountague Randall Crew Hen. Yelverton Iohn Walter Now forasmuch as Mercy and Justice be the true supports of your Royall Throne and that it properly belongeth to us in our Princely office to take care and provide that our Subjects have equall and indifferent Justice ministred to them and that where their case deserveth to be relieved in course of equity by suit in our Court of Chancery they should not be abandoned and exposed to perish under the Rigor and extremity of our Lawes we in our Princely judgement having well weighed and with mature deliberation considered of the said severall reports of our learned Councell and of all the parts of them doe approve ratifie and confirme as well the practise of our court of Chancery expressed in the first Certificate as their opinions for the Law upon the Statutes mentioned in their latter Certificate the same having relation to the case sent them by our said Chancellor and doe will and command that our Chancellor or Keeper of the Great Seale for the time being shall not hereafter desist unto our Subjects upon their severall complaints now or hereafter to be made such reliefe in equity notwithstanding any former proceedings at the common Law against them as shall stand with true merits and Justice of their cases and with the former ancient and continued practise and proceeding of our Chancery and for that it appertaineth to our Princely care and office onely to Judge over all our Iudges and to discerne and determine such differences as at any time may or shall arise between our severall courts touching the jurisdictions and the same to settle and decide as we in our Princely wisdome shall find to stand most with our Honor and the example of our Royall Progenitors in the best times and the generall weale and good of our people for which we are to answer unto God who hath placed us over them Our will and pleasure is that our whole proceedings herein by the decrees formerly set down be inrolled in our court of Chancery there to remaine of record for the better extinguishing of the like questions or differences that may arrise in future times Per ipsum Regem Fran. Bacon Hen. Yelverton Decimo octavo Iulii Anno 14. R. Regis c. FINIS Payment after the day upon bonds holpen Condition to undoe estates in Lands Giving day to one it shall help the other Payment without acquittance Lessees damages in waste moderated by the death of the Lessor The greater part of the debt paid and the rest offered relieved in Chancery Purchasor of parcell of land not snbject to the whole rent charge Suing in a wrong County Copyholders Not to examine any Judgement given at the common Law Dyer â—01 and 301. Atturnement Atturnement denyed but in some Cases Fineâ— Recoveries c. Mulier and Bastard Warranty Extentâ— Lawes Nudum pactum Wager of Law No seizin of a reâ—t seck Possessio so oris in Copâ—yhold Copyhold Possession of the Mother for the hâ—r Collaterall Copyhold devise Copyhold forfeited for cutting of Trees during minority Tenant right Fines for alienation of the Tenant but not of the Lord Payment of Creditors out of a Copyhold forfeited by Morgage Lease paroll Marriage poâ—tion recovered at common Law and reversed in the Exchequer holpen in Chancery Perpetuities Lease for 1000 yeares Statute lands bought with Money lent prâ—oâ—ity â—ans Covyn Bailement sans consideration countermanded Voide limitation de Lease in vol. Cook lib. 8.95 Ravishment de gâ—rd Survivor in Joynt Tenaâ—cy de Lease Feoffees to use Notice of the use If my Feoffee dye I have no remedy against his Heir The Feoffee shall doe Acts for the Feoffors good They may grant Offices but not annuities Fees to councell Money given to buy Lands The Feoffee shall retain the Land to his own use fur-attain der de felony Intent specified in a Feoffment to use Uses of gavell kinde at the common Law 26. H. 8. Dy. 6. Cesti que use de tearme de ans. Jurament delatum a parte AEquitas sequitur legem Things left to the conscience of the party Help in Chancery against Executors Surety The surety chargeable To help the surety No other reliefe for the surety then for the principall Purchasor Fraud upon fraud Feoffee punishable for making Estate at the wives request during the Coverture No reliefe against his own deed Release of joint Feoffee Subpoena gainst one appointed by will to sell To discharge himselfe of a bond is permitted in equity Forced to sue an Obligation Executor shall not release a bond without his Co-partner Executors shall not answer without his Copartners Copartners to joyne in Plea or presentment One deed by which two claime severally Where remedy at common Law no help here Goods of Felons granted which are difficult to prove Bringing evidence into Court Justifying detaining of evidences Tenants of the Land uncertaine Tenants in common to know the certainty Supply of true meanning in Feoffments To bring in an obligation to be cancelled Money paid upon Obligation single or single Statute not compelled here to cancell it Yet upon a morgage he shall be compelled to bring in the indenture to be cancelled here Lands sold in two counties and livery made onely in one Leassor to have the woods leaving sufficient booteâ— Messuage cum pertin. carries the land used with it Mannor demised
defendants wife in his house sufficient A years value allowed upon surrender of Copy hold Land The plaintant sueth for tokens he delivered to the defendant as a suiter in marriage and obtaineth them A Bill against a Copy of Court Roll indirectly entred the defendants demurre but ordered to answer Variance in a Bill of Revivor from the first bill dissolved Jurisdiction of Oxford rejected one of the defendants being not resident there Prosecuting contempt after a generall pardon to pay costs Subpoena hanged on the door of an house where the defendant resorted Witnesses examined by fraud suppressed and the practizers to be proceeded against by Bill Jurisdiction of Lancaster allowed Suit to have the defendant performe an award Two defendants the one taketh a husband the plaintant puts in a Bill of revivor against husband and wife and they discharged with costâ— The plaintant oâ—dered not to proceed till he make one a party whom the defendant prayeth in ayde Injunction left at the defendants house and disobeyed an Attachment A Commission of rebellion the bond made to the Commissioners The bond made to the Lord Chancellor c. Witnesses examined after publication ad informandum conscientiam Iudicis Costs for want of a Bill shewing the Subpoena but delivering no note of the dâ—y of appearance and attachment for such serving Jurisdiction of Chester allowed A Covenant to repaire a house the defendant would not suffer it and demurred but ordered to answer Jurisdiction of Chester allowed A Subpoena served to testifie in the Guild-hall and not appearing an Attachment A Bill against Roger Hall and another Roger Hall was served he must shew it by Plea and not by motion Costs to witnesses served to testifie Costs paid to a witnesse before he be examined A Solliciter served with processe to testifie ordered not to be examined A man and wife exhibite their Bill the wife dyes the defendant demurs for that there is no Bill of revivor ordered to Answer The sollicitor served to testifie is discharged Consiliâ— The Leasses of a Copyholder is punishable in waste though the Copyholder himselfe be not A Bill of perjury proceeded in this Court Suite to have an award by assent decreed To stay suit in the spirituall court Suite for common of pasture and Turbary Subpoena delivered to the defendants servant Subpoena served at the sâ—â—te of aâ— unknown man and no Bill in Court the server to pay costs The husband appeares and the wife not Attachment against them both Jurisdiction of Oxford Consil. A Mr. and examinor examined witnesses publication stayed after granted The plain father seized in Fee with a condition to reenter deviseth for life A ducens teciâ— The defendant licensed to depart after issue Trustee ordered to coâ—vey the Lands according to the trust Jurisdiction of the Excheqner rejected for that one of the defendants had no priviledge there The defend in a Bill of perjury after answer ought to be examined upon interrogatories The plaint requires the defendant to appear shewing no writ and no Bill in Court hath 20 s. costs Affidavit for serving a Subpoena The defend hath no cost because the Subpoena is lost but Attachment is stayed Costs for want of a Bill The defend disclaiming no witnesses to be examined touching the death of another The defen. bound to pay money at one place pleads payment at another not good A demurrer to a Bill of revivor ordered to answer The wife after the death of her husband sueth a Bill of revivor and good To take bond of such as appear upon contempt to attend from day to day The defen. demurres for that there is remedy at common law but ordered to answer Habeas corpus to the warden of the Fleet to have the defendant in Court to be charged with a debt upon a recognizance Costs for the Solliciters charges in making Affidavit for serving processe and the defendants impotency no Bill being in Court Costs for want of a Bill upon shewing the Writ but not delivering it Attachm discharged and a Bill of perjuâ—y for procuring it indirectly The Lord Chancellor writ his letters to a Noble man that had broken a decree Injunction against the spirituall Court Attachment upon the defendants confession he was served Jurisdictio of Oxford allowed Decree for Copyhold lands Costs for want of a Bill the Subpoena being lost Dismission because under 40 s. per annum Jurisdiction of Wales allowed being under five pound Suit retained after Judgement and execution Costs against the plaint for want of a Bill Commission to set out meet wayes for passages An English Bill for perjury Injunction to stay judgement in an action of wast Reliefe for a trust upon a Lease after it is sold A Bill for reliefe after Judgement and execution dismissed A Bill upon a promise for leave to dry clothes in a garden dismissed Attachment for not appearing upon a Subpoena Day given to the Sheriffe to returne an Attachment upon paine of 5 l. Consil. Injunction to stay suits because the Queene was deceived of her fine Consil. The Heire is sued to make a lease for which his elder brother tooke a fine or to repay the fine The Clarke is fined 40 s. for his mistake in making a Subpoena Subpoena delivered to the wife good The plaintâ— refusing to seale a release the defendant puts a bond in suite and stayed by Injunction Attachment with Proclamation discharged paying the ordinary Fee answer being in befoâ—e One Executor sueth the other to put in sureties to performe the Will The contempt discharged and â— new Commission granted to take the defendants answers Prohibition for Tythes of Lands held in Capiâ—e Costs for want of a Bill oath made befoâ—e the Major of Totnes Attorney present in Court enjoyned not to proceed at common law Suite for â—ent of 10 s. Affidavit the he saw a Subpoena served Atâ—achment against witnesses served to testifie Atachment upon the defendants confession he was served Two joint tenants the one dyeth the other ordered to make Estate according to the Will Witnesse that answer insufficienâ— againe examined Jurisdiction of Chester allowed A suit for a Hawk and evidences dismissed The Bill dismissed because the councellors hand is counterfeit Costs for prosecuting contemâ—ts and none proved Fraud by makâ—ng a lease after a feoffement and before livery and seizin Suit stayed in the Kings Bench because it was removed from London Suit for common A Bill for 6 l dismissed Costs upon a Billet delivered to a brother and no Bill in Court Commission to take the defendants answer upon oath of impotency before the Mayor of Totnes Consil. Consil. The defen. 70. years old Jurisdiction of Wales allowed Consil. Attachment upon oath before the Bayliffes of Mountgomery Consilio Dismission because under 40 s. per annum Injunction for defrauding the Queen of her fine Consil. Attachment upon oath before the Major of Tâ—tnes Jurisdiction of the Mannor of Woodstock overruled Commission to examine in perpetuall memory Leâ—ssee not named
in the premises decreed for him One Executor gets the estate and dyeth the other sueth his Executor and ordered for him Feme covert sueth for maintenance put into anothers hands he demurrs but ordeâ—ed to answer One Subpoena served on two defendants two Bills exhibited ordered to answer both The defend demurred generally ordered to answer Two executors exhibite two Bills ordered to answer the one the other dismissed with costs Witnesses examined in perpetuall memory the one dead and the other sick moved to use their testimony A Subpoena served within two dayes of the Termes end the Attachment discharged answering The solliciter of the plaintant ordered to be examined with caution A Bill without a counsellors hand or Atturney retained dismissed Iurisdicton of Wales overuled Jurisdiction of Wales overruled The defend stayed by Injunction to pul down roomes to the prejudice of anothers rooms Upon a Commission warning given but to one defendant a new Câ—mmission is granted and the defendants to have the carriage A Subpoena left in the defendants Hall an Attachment Witnesses examined before the Towne Clark of Yoâ—k suppressed The server of a Subpoena imprisoned therefore Attachment against the defendant Iurisdiction of Wales admitted A rent reserved and paid the heire ordered to pay it A rent charge upon severall mens Lands and levied upon one an Injunction A dumb man is not to answer upon Subpoena Money paid for a reversion which could not be enjoyed ordered to repay the same No Witnesses to be examined till the defendants have answered An action against a drunken mans words seeketh reliefe but is dismissed A Subpoena shewed and offered Attachment for not appearing Witnesses examined 1. and 2. P. and M. ordered to prefer a Bill for publâ—cation Attachment discharged by supersedeas paying the ordinary Fees The defendants wife examined as a witnesse Suit upon a promise to surrender a lease dismissed Subpoena to testifie where no cause was depending discharged Jurisdictioâ— of the North allowed Jurisdiction of the Exchequer disallowed A Subpoena cauâ—elously served Attachment against the plaintant A Bill for tuition of an infant Costs for a witnesse served to testifie Deeds neglected to be inrolled a Subpoena to shew why not Jurisdiction of the Dutchy of Lancaster allowed The matter of asâ—umpsit reâ—ered to the common Law Feme sole sueth out a Subpoena and the same day is married dismissed with costs The plaint enters upon the defend possession ordered either a dismission or injunction Prohibition for sithes parcell of the Dutchy of Cornewall but consultation if cause be not shewed Perjuâ—y in mâ—king oath for impotency one of the same name sued for it and discharged A witnesse not able to travell discharged of contempt Jurisdiction of Wales not allowed for a promise A Commission to answer he returned a demurrer therefore Attachment A Councellor not to be examined of any matter wherein he hath been of Councell A Billet in paper served and no Bill in Court costs is awarded Feme covert whose husband is in the Gallies must answer matter of equity wherewith she is charged Injunction left at the defendants house and disobeyed an Attachment is awarded Consil. Costs for want of a Bill Iurisdiction of Wales allowed A Writ of priviledge disallowed Bayliffes of a Corporation not compellable to make a Lease Attachment for breaking an order in Court Suit for Hay Corn and grasse not worth 40 s. dismissed Suit for the poor of a parish under 40. s. per annum â—erained Attachment upon oath before the Portrive of Minxhead Confil. A decree for the plaint yet put out of possession by the defendant Defendant departing without license an Attachment Attachment discharged paying the plaintant 10 s. costs Liberty for a common Fishing A Bond put in suit for not performing an award stayed by Injunction Injunction to stay suit at common Law Commission of Rebellion for not payment of costs The defend discharged of the Attachment because the Subpoena was counterfeit An award ordered to be performed The defendant licensed to depart after answer in a writ of priviledge The defendant commiâ—ted to the Fleet for a Rescue brought an action for a false returne Subpoena against the plaintant to shew where he had his counterfeit Writs and answer his misdemeanor and pay costs Costs for want of a Bill Costs for want of a Bill the Billet being lost A demurrer without shewing any cause ordered to answer Five pound dismissed Commission to take the defendants answers they being 70 yeares old a peece 20. of Fâ—b Sir Nicholas Bacon dyed 12 of April the Seale delivered to Sir Thomas Bromley Councell on both sides to attend concerning the ratifying of an award Jurisdiction of Chester allowed No costs to be allowed upon a disclaimer Costs allowed the defendant being taken upon a Commission of rebellion Costs for want of a Bill the Billet lost A Commission to examine witnesses in perpetuall memory Attachment for not appearing Dismission for that they have been in possession 100. years Attachment for putting in a demurrer instead of an answer Day given to the defendant to rejoyne A new commission to examine witnesses because they appeared not before Not to extend one mans Lands onely where many are subject Injunction to stay suit at Common Law A new Commission to the defendant and publication is stayed of witnesses examined by the plaint in Court The defendant not to answer till a Counsellors hand be put to the Bill Dismission the Lands being under 40 s. per annum Injunction to stay a suite of Quo minus in the Exchequer Attachment against witnesses served to testifieâ— Attachment for costs Injunction to stay suits at common Law A demurrer generally ordered to answer The defendant charged upon account shall not answer if upon a pâ—omise he shall A Commission by consent to prove the receipt of rents fines and Woodsales The enâ—rance in Seldens discourse fol. 63 b.