Will only to Land and a Testament only to Chattels requiring Executors which a Will only for Land doth not require For it seems that by the Common Law where Lands or Tenements are only devised by writing albeit there be no Executor named yet that is properly called a Last Will and where it concerns only Chattels a Testament The truth is a Testament taken strictly according to the said definition differeth from a Last Will yet not as opposite thereto but only as the Special differeth from the General for every Testament is a Last Will but every Last Will is not a Testament In a word a Last Will is a general word and agrees with each several kind of Last Wills or Testaments But a Testament properly so called is only that kind of Last Will wherein an Executor is named or appointed Plowden in his Commentaries doth define a Testament to be the Witness of the mind and to be compounded of these two words viz. Testatio and Mentis But this is no adequate definition of a Testament neither is it a compound word but a single word such as is Calceamentum Paludamentum and the like And if it be demanded whether a Testament may be good in Law without a Seal it is Answered in the Affirmative for a Seal is not absolutely necessary to a Testament though it may be fit and expedient For a Will not being properly and legally a Deed may be good enough without a Seal which is one essential part of a Deed yet hath a Will the force and effect of a Deed. CHAP. II. Of the several Distinctions or kinds of Testaments A Testament is either Solemn or Vnsolemn This though the first and greatest distinction of Testaments yet of least force or use with us now in England 2. Testaments are either written or Nuncupative 3. They are either priviledged or unpriviledged Of Priviledged Testaments there are three sorts whereof some are called Militarie Testaments others are called Testaments only among the Testators own Children and others are Testaments to Charitable and Pious uses But if no Executor be named or appointed then it hath not the name of a Testament yet it shall retain the name of a Last Will and comprehends one of these three viz. either a Codicil or a Legacy and Devise or a Gift in regard or by reason of death CHAP. III. Of Testaments Solemn and Vnsolemn IN Solemn Testaments are comprehended the Solemnities of the Civil Law as the presence of seven Witnesses their subscription or subsignation the making or expediting the act of the Will it self at one and the same time with divers other Solemnities necessarily required by the Civil Law as Essential to a Testament whereof we have no use here in England being not obliged to such Ceremonies In Vnsolemn Testaments the said Ceremonies are omitted and such are our Testaments here in England wherein we are no further obliged than to the observation of such Requisites as are necessary Jure Gentium which requires but two Witnesses And saving in a Devise of Land wherein Writing is also necessary and that it be made in the Testators life time The Testator if he please may make use of more than two witnesses and procure their subscription yea for prevention of Forgery to every page of the Testament but no obligation hereto CHAP. IV. Of Testaments Written and Nuncupative 1. Testament Written what 2. Difference between Devise of Lands and Bequest of Goods 3. Lands of Burgage tenure and by Custome deviseable may pass Nuncupatively 4. Naming Executor not necessary in a Will only for devise of Lands 5. Notes taken in writing-sufficient for devise of Lands 6. Testament Nuncupative what 7. The Will whether Nuncupative or Written in case the Executors Name be omitted out of the writing 8. Law Cases relating to this subject § 1. A Written Testament is such as at the time of making thereof is committed to writing By which words are excluded such Testaments as are afterwards put into writing For being first made by word of mouth they still remain Nuncupative notwithstanding the reducing thereof into writing after the Testators death Among other advantages that a Testator hath by a written Will this is one that he may conceal the Contents thereof from the Witnesses which in a Nuncupative Will he cannot do And it is sufficient if taking his Will in his hand he say unto the Witnesses This is my Last Will and Testament or herein is contained my Last Will or other words to the like effect 2. As touching the disposition of Land of Inheritance by Will if it be not fully written before the Testators death so far at least as concerns the disposition of the said Land it may not be for that part made good by reducing it to writing after the Testators death but as touching Goods and Chattels it may Nevertheless if it be written before the Testators death though it be never brought nor read to him after the writing thereof yet is it good enough and that not only for Land but also for Goods and Chattels provided that there be an Executor named And this shall be a Will in writing and not verbal only yea though it want the subscription of the Testators Name For many cannot write at all and some want hands Nor is the subscribing the name of the Maker any essential part of a Deed much less of a Will which needs not sealing as a Deed doth 3. Lands and Tenements deviseable by Custome may pass by a Nuncupative Will for any time whatsoever for in a Devise of Lands Tenements and Hereditaments held in Burgage-tenure it is not necessary that the same should be written because such may pass sufficiently by Will Nuncupative because such Lands were deviseable before the making of the Statute of H. 8. enabling to devise Lands Tenements and Hereditaments by Will in writing in the Testators life-time which cannot pass by a Nuncupative Testament or Will without writing So that Lands of Burgage-tenure and by Custome deviseable may pass Nuncupatively though Lands of other tenures are not deviseable but by Will in writing 4. Though the naming or appointing of an Executor be essential to constitute a Testament or Last Will yet this properly refers only as to Goods and Chattels for a man may by his Last Will in writing devise his Lands Tenements and Hereditaments though he make no Executors because an Executor hath nothing to do with the freehold of Land 5. If the Writer doth only take Notes from the mouth of the Testator of his Last Will for the devise of Lands Tenements and Hereditaments and afterwards write the same but the Testator dies before it be shewed unto him yet this is sufficient for a Will in writing for the coveying of Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Likewise it is sufficient if Notes or Articles be made and read to
the Testator though the same be not ingrossed at large or in form of Law until after the Testators death 6. Testaments are called Nuncupative when the Testator without any writing doth declare his Will before a sufficient number of Witnesses and such Nuncupative Will is of as great force and efficacy except for Lands Tenements and Hereditaments as any written Testament Yea this verbal oral or Nuncupative Will being after the Testators death reduced to writing and having the Court Seal affixed thereunto is of as good validity touching the disposal of Goods and Chattels as if it had been written in the Testators life-time 7. Although many Legacies be made and written in a Will and many things expressed to be done yet if no Executor be named in the writing only A. and B. by word of mouth appointed to be Executors this shall not amount to a Will in writing but to a Nuncupative will only because one essential part of the Will viz. the appointing of an Executor is omitted out of the writing Nay the appointing of him Executor who is named in such a Note left with C. D. is no sufficient making of an Executor at all Nor is the appointing of any one by a doubtfull and uncertain Name a sufficient making either of an Executor or Legatary unless some other sufficient circumstance doth make it plainly appear whom the Testator meant so tender and cautious is the Law of fixing the interest of any upon meer doubts and uncertainties 8. A man took Notes of a Will of one who lay sick and afterwards he drew up the Will in writing but the sick person dyed before it was shewed to him Yet it was the opinion of the whole Court that the same was a good Will within the Statute of 32 H. 8. to convey Socage Land Trin. 6 E. 6. Dyer 72. So was it adjudged in 4 and 5 Eliz. in Hinton's Case where Articles were read to the Devisor concerning the disposition of his Lands and the Articles were written and engrossed after his death and yet it was a good Will within the said Statute of 32 H. 8. A man intended Land to J. S. for life the remainder to J. D. and before the remainder was written the Devisor dyed It was the opinion of the Court that the same was a void Devise for the whole Lands within the Statute of 32 H. 8. because that the one did depend upon the other But in that case it was holden that if a man seised of two Acres intends one of them to J. S. and the other to J. D. and the Devise to one is written but the Devisor dyeth before the Devise of the other Acre to the other is written It is a good Devise for the Acre which is written but not for the other Acre B. Brought Writ of Entry in nature of an Assize against his Fathers Wife The Case upon Evidence was this viz. H. B. the Plaintiffs Father and Husband of the said Wife being sick at London sends for A. desiring him to write the Last Will and Testament of his Lands A. desires B. to declare what he would have his Last Will and Testament to be and who to be his Executors whereupon A. wrote short Notes of his Last Will and every Legacy and who should be his Executors then return'd to his own House there wrote the said Will in Order and Form and therewith returning to the House of H. B. within half an hour after 12 intending to have read the same unto him was then told that the said H. B. dyed at twelve of the clock just before Whereupon A. delivered the same to the Executors that were therein named The Wife enters on the Testators Tenements and what was Devised to her the Son enters upon her the Wife re-enters whereupon the Plaintiff brought his Writ The Opinion of all the Justices was That it was a good Will in writing according to the Stat. of 32 H. 8. and declared their Opinion on the Evidence given whereupon it passed for the Wife and she enjoy'd the Land CHAP. V. Of Testaments Priviledged and Unpriviledged 1. Testaments Priviledged what and how many kinds thereof 2. Military Testaments their priviledges 3. Testaments made in favour of the Testators Children their priviledges 4. Testaments made for good and pious uses their priviledges 5. Testaments Vnpriviledged what § 1. TEstaments Priviledged are such as are qualified by some special freedome or benefit contrary to the common course of Law or by some special freedome are discharged from the usual Requisites and Observations of Common and General Law whereof there are as in the second Chapter chiefly these three kinds viz. 1. Military Testaments 2. Testaments made in favour of the Testators Children 3. Testaments for good and pious uses 2. The priviledges of Military Testaments or of a Testament made by a Souldier are many but chiefly these Four viz. 1. A Souldier is not disabled from making his Testament by any of those impediments which disable others unless for want of Reason or other like grand causes whereby he is disabled Jure Gentium 2. Whereas divers persons are prohibited from being Executors or Legataries to other persons yet the Law doth not so prohibite them from being Executors or Legataries to a Souldier save in some very few Cases specially limited in the Law 3. Souldiers are clearly acquitted from the observation of the Solemnities of the Civil Law in making of Testaments 4. Whereas no other person can dye with two valid Testaments yet a Souldier may and both Testaments shall stand good according to the intent or meaning of the Testator Other priviledges there are peculiar to Souldiers in making their Testaments but they being many it would not answer the design of a Compendium to make a specification thereof Only let it not here escape our Observation that these Priviledges belong only to such Souldiers as are in expedition or actual Service of war and not to such as lye safely and securely in some Castle Garrison or other like place of defence 3. The priviledges of Testaments made in favour of the Testators Children are chiefly these three viz. 1. If two Testaments be found after the Testators death of divers tenures and it appear not which of them is the latter Testament In this Case that shall be presumed the latter and so prevail which is made in favour of the Testators Children 2. The Testament made in favour of the Testators Children is not so easily revoked as possibly other Testaments may be 3. A Fathers Testament among his Children shall take effect though there be no Witnesses to prove the same being written or subscribed by the Testators hand or by him procured to be written by some other Howbeit these two last Priviledges by the Custome of England the latter of them especially are common to all English mens Testaments so also are all
an Account against B. as Receiver of the monies of the said J. S. upon Ne unque Receiver pleaded It was found for the Plaintiff and Judgment given that he should Account and being in Custody upon a Capias ad Computandum he was found in Arrearages and his body taken in Execution Afterwards the Will was made void in the Ecclesiastical Court for that the said J. S. was an Ideot from his birth which being certified by Writ into the Chancery and thence by Mittimus into B. R. an Audita Querela was brought by B. setting forth all the said matter whereupon the Court demurr'd It was said by Cook That in 35 H. 8. It had been Adjudged That in that Case the Audita Querela did well Lie The Marquess of Winchester by his Will in writing as supposed Devised divers Mannors to his Reputed Sons Devising further that they should sell divers Mannors and also bequeathed Plate and other Legacies to them This Will was assayed to be Proved in the Prerogative Court but it appearing by circumstances the said Marquess to be Non compos mentis at the time when the supposed Will was made it was moved for a Prohibition in B. R. because a Will touching Lands and a Will concerning Goods were both mixt together and that in Case they should there proceed as to the Goods the same would prevent the Tryal in the Kings Bench where a Will for Land shall be Tryed for which Reason a Prohibition in that Case was generally awarded 2. In that Case it was resolved That a Testator at the making of his Will ought to be of a memory not only to answer to ordinary and familiar questions but also to have a disposing memory so as to be able to make a disposition of his Lands with Reason and Understanding and that That is such a memory which the Law calls Sanae Memoriae CHAP. IX Of Persons Intestable for want of Freedom or Liberty 1. Of Villaines 2. Of Captives 3. Of Prisoners 1. VIllaines are Intestable if their Lord by Entry and Seizing take and enjoy all their Lands and Goods otherwise their Wills are not void but by such Entry and Seizing before Probate they become voidable Except of such Goods whereof such Villains were Executors to others for of such Goods they may not only make their Wills but also maintain actions even against their Lords in case they should take from them such goods as they have by Executorship But of this there is little or no use with us now here in England as in former times 2. A Captive during the time of his Captivity cannot make a Testament yea though he afterwards make an escape yet the Testament made during the Captivity is void but if it were made before his Captivity then after his escape or enlargement it shall be as good in Law as if he had not been Captive at all Likewise he that is alive and in Captivity for the upholding of his Will which he made in his Liberty is feigned by a Legal fiction to be dead the hour before he became Captive so that if he dye in Captivity yet is his Testament so made before his Captivity allowed and his Executor shall have all his Goods as if he had died the day before his Captivity Likewise if any person be taken by a Pirate Turk Infidel or Christian with whom open War is not proclaimed he so taken remaineth a Freeman in construction of Law as to Testability notwithstanding such Capture and therefore his Testament made during such restraint shall be good 3. Persons condemn'd to perpetual Imprisonment cannot make a Testament But a person imprisoned only for debt or the like is not thereby disabled to make his Testament or is his Testament void except it be made in the favour of him at whose Suit the Testator is imprisoned on purpose to extort the same from him CHAP. X. Of Women Covert 1. Women Covert Intestable as to Lands 2. They are Intestable as to Goods without the Husbands License 3. They are Testable as to Chattels by Executrixship 4. They are Testable as to things meerly in action whereof they were not possessed during Coverture 5. Whether they may accept Executrixship without their Husbands consent or the Husband Administer in case of their refusal thereof 6. Cases in the Law concerning this Subject 1. THat Women Covert are Intestable for want of Freedome is not such a general Rule in Law as to exclude all exceptions It is true a married woman cannot make her Testament of any Lands Tenements or Hereditaments specially she cannot devise the same to her Husband though she were not thereto constrain'd by him but would do it of her own accord freely and voluntarily and though such Testament were made before her Marriage with such Legatary-husband And albeit the Wife survive the Husband yet the Testament made during Coverture is not good But yet if after her Husbands death she approve and confirm such Testament made under Coverture then this new Consent or new Declaration of her Will makes the Devise good Also if the Testament were made before Marriage and she out-live her Husband it shall be good Also where power of selling the Testators Land is given to a Wife-Executrix there she may sell even to her own Husband or to whom she please 2. Of Goods and Chattels the Wife cannot make her Testament without her Husbands License for all the Goods and Chattels which the Wife had at the time of marriage and all the Chattels real if he survive the Wife belong unto the Husband by vertue of the said marriage Yet by the Husbands License she may make her Testament even of his Goods yea though the Husband understand not of his Wifes Will yet if after Probate thereof made by the Executors he deliver them the Goods therein Devised he thereby ratifies the Testament though he were not privy to the making thereof for the Goods being once delivered by him according to the tenour of the Will it is then too late for him to revoke the same Otherwise notwithstanding his License given her to make a Will of his Goods he may revoke the same at any time before the Probate thereof Or otherwise having made her Will by her Husbands License he may chuse whether he will suffer it to be Proved for his Consent is necessary as well to the Approbation as to the first making thereof And this extends also to the Goods which she had in her own right before marriage for thereby immediately all Chattels personal and Goods moveable are so devested out of her into her Husband that although she survive him yet they return not to her again but go to her Husbands Executor or Administrator 3. Touching Goods which she hath as Executrix to another the Case is otherwise for such do whether she or her Husband
Executors if they have no further Authority or Interest than only to sell the Land and distribute the money for then the Frank-Tenement doth descend to the Heir and the Executors are bound to perform the Devise in convenient time But if the money for the same be to be distributed in pios usus then the Frank-Tenement is in the Executors after the death of the Testator and not in the Heir So that in such Case he may not Enter as in the former Yea if Lands Devised to be sold be not accordingly so done by the Executors the Law will then enforce them to sell the Lands so soon as they can because the mean Profits in that Case taken before Sale are not Assets to charge the Executors as compellable to pay debts of the same But if a man Devise that his Executors shall sell his Land there they may sell it at any time for that they have but a bare and naked Power and no Profit 4. If many Executors be named in a Will wherein Power is given to them to sell Land for any purpose and some of these Executors refuse the Executorship In this Case the other Executors who stand to the Will may dispose and sell the Land without the consent of the other who so refused the Executorship But Note That an Executors Executor cannot sell the Land of the first Testator who by his Will gave Power to his Executor to sell the same unless there be a Co-Executor surviving 5. Although the surviving Executor may sell the Land which a Testator doth bequeath to his Executors to be Sold because as the State so the Trust shall survive yet in case the Executors in that part of the Will impowering them to Sell be particularly Named each by his particular Name and one of them refuse and dye before Sale made then the Survivors cannot sell the same because the words of the Testator one of the Executors refusing or being dead cannot be satisfied unless the Testator express in his Will a Power to the Survivors or Survivor of them or to such or so many of them as take upon them the Probate of the Will without which words the Executors being particularly Named it is otherwise But if the Land to be Sold be left to his Executors generally not particularizing their Names then Sale made by some of them only in this Case is good for that now by the Statute of 21 H. 8. cap. 4. it is Provided That where Lands be Willed to be sold by Executors though part of them refuse yet the residue may sell But here Note That they may not sell to him that so refused because he is yet a party and privy to the Last Will and remains an Executor still so long as any Co-Executor lives For it was the Opinion of the c. Note that by the Opinion of the Justices if a man makes his Last Will and Wills that his Executors shall sell his Land and Devises his Land to his Executors to be sold and one of the Executors refuse the Administration of the Testators Goods before the Ordinary the other Executors cannot sell the said Land to the Executor so refusing the Administration by the Statute 21 H. 8. cap. 4. For that Executor notwithstanding such his refusal is still a party and privy to the said Testament and is one of the Executors at his pleasure It was adjudged in B. R. between Vincent and Lee where a man devised That his Sons in Law should sell the Reversion of his Land without mentioning their particular Names if some of them dye that the others may sell Upon a special Verdict the Case was A man seised of Lands in Possession and of other Lands in Reversion upon an Estate for life Deviseth by his Will in writing That his Executors should have all his Lands Free and Customary in D. for Ten Years to perform his Will and the Will of his Father with the Profits thereof and that after the Ten Years his Executors or any of them should sell it for the payment of his Debts He makes Three Executors and dies The one dies the Ten Years expire Tenant for Life dies the Two surviving Executors sell the Land c. Spurling This Sale is not good 1. The Reversion of the Estate for Life passed not because he had other Lands there to satisfie the words and it was not his intent to pass it because there were not any Profits to be taken thereby 2. The Sale by the Two surviving Executors is not good for it ought to have been by all or by one of them only But the Court resolved to the contrary in both wherefore it was adjudged accordingly The same Case is Reported by Anderson thus viz. J. T. brought Ejectione Firmae against J. W. and others The Defendants pleaded Non Culp whereupon Special Verdict was given the which in effect was That one Smith being seised of Twenty Acres of Land made a Lease thereof to one for Life and being also seised of Sixty other Acres made his Will in manner following viz. I Will and Charge my Executors and every of them to fulfill my Fathers Will and this my Last Will in which were divers Legacies In Consideration whereof I give all my Lands and Tenements to my Executors and they to take the Profits thereof by the space of Ten Years and those Ten Years ended I will the same to be sold by my said Executors or by one of them And made Three Executors and died after the Tenant for life died one of the Executors died also The Two Executors Enter on the Sixty Acres and receive the Profits thereof for Ten Years but Entered not on the Twenty Acres but after the Ten Years ended the surviving Executors sold the Twenty Acres to J. H. who Entered and Leased the same whereon the Action is brought It was said That the Executors did not Sell but it was adjudged that the surviving Executors might Sell For it appeared that the Intention of the Testator was That the Land should be sold for the performance of his Will which the surviving Executors might Execute and consequently do what the Testator appointed in order thereunto CHAP. XXVIII Of Debts Legacies and Mortuaries and the Executors method in the payment thereof 1. Debts to be paid before Legacies 2. The Executor may pay himself first 3. What Debts to the Crown shall have priority of payment before Debts to the Subject 4. Judgements upon Record to be satisfied next after the Debts due to the Crown 5. Next after Judgements upon Record Debts by Statutes or Recognizances are payable before meer Personal Debts 6. After Statutes and Recognizances Debts due by Obligations or penal or single Bills are to have the next precedency in payment 7. Debts upon Specialties Bonds and Bills are to be satisfied before Debts upon a simple Contract 8. After Obligations Debts due upon simple Bills Merchants Books and other Specialties are
a Disseisor Devise the Land he hath gotten by Disseizin this Devise as to the Disseizee is void Likewise if a Man be Disseized of his Land so that he hath nothing but a Right thereof left and then he Devise this Right or the Land this Devise is also void So if one Contract for Land and pay his Money for the same but hath no Assurance made him of the Land and he Devise the same to another such Devise cannot be good yet possibly he that received the Money may be compellable in a Court of Equity to Assure and Settle the Land according to the Devise Likewise if one Devise another Mans Land such Devise is void but if after such Devise made he Purchase this Land and die without Revocation now is that Devise good Also if A. Bargain and Sell Land to B. on Condition of Re-entry if he pay to B. Twenty Pounds and B. Covenants that he will not take the Profits until default of Payment and A. make a Lease of Seven Years thereof to another and after break the Condition in this case B. may Devise the Land and the Devise will be good 3. If one Devise his Land to the Children of A. B. by this Devise the Children that A. B. hath at the Time of the Devise made or at most at the Time of the Testators death and not such as shall be Born after his death shall take by that Devise and have the Land Also if a Devise of Lands or Goods be made to the Heirs of A. B. he then and at the Time of the Testators death being alive this Devise is void because the person to whom a Devise is made must be capable of the Devise by that Name by which the Devise is made to him when there is no other description whereby to infer the Testators meaning yet if Lands or Goods be Devised to the Executors of A. B. and he die before the Testator and make Executors This is a good Devise to such Executors or if a Man make a Feofment of his Land to the use of his last Will and then Devise that his Feoffees shall be Seized to the use of B. C. This is a good Devise of the Land per intentionem Also a Devise of Land to one paying so much a Year to another with a Clause of Distress upon failure of Payment is a good Devise but a Warranty cannot be made by a a Will Yet if Land be Devised for Life or in Tail Reserving a Rent in this case the Devisors Heirs shall be bound to the Warranty in Law and the Devisee shall take advantage thereof Also a Devise of Land may be made to one and a Devise of a Rent out of the same Land to another in the same Will and both stand good Likewise Land may be Devised to one in Fee and after the same Land in the same Will may be Devised to another for Life or for Years and both these Devises may be good and may well consist together 4. In like manner if a Man in the former part of his Will Devise all his Lands by general words to one in Fee and in the latter part of his Will Devise some special part thereof unto another in Fee Both these Devises are good and may stand together that is The former Devise is good for as much as is not afterwards more specially Devised notwithstanding the Subsequent Specification and the latter is good for so much as is so specially Devised notwithstanding the precedent general Disposition It is otherwise when the general Clause comes last for then the first Devise is void So also it is supposed to be where both the Devises are particular that then the first Devise is void As suppose a Man doth first in his Will Devise Long-acre to A. and his Heirs afterwards in the same Will he doth Devise the same Land to B. and his Heirs in this case some have held the first Devise to A. is void which others have denyed holding that both the Devises are good and that A. and B. in this case shall be Joynt-Tenants 5. If a Man Devise the Use Profits or Occupation of his Land by this Devise the Land it self is Devised Or if a Man Devise only the Profits of his Land this is a Devise of the Land it self For Lands will pass by words in a Will which will not pass by the same words in a Deed but whatsoever will pass by any Words in a Deed will pass by the same Words in a Will The Reason is because Wills are always more favourably interpreted than Deeds and there is good Reason for that also If a Man says in his Will I give all my Land or all my Tenements to A. B. he shall have not only all the Lands whereof the Devisor is Sole Seized but also all the Lands whereof he is Seized in Common or Co-parcenary with another and not only all the Lands he hath in possession but also the Lands he hath in Reversion of any Estate he hath in Fee-simple But if he say I give all my Lands in Possession only then the Lands he hath in Reversion are excluded out of that Devise 6. If a Man Seized of Land of Fee-simple in the Parish of Grade saith in his Will I give all my Lands in the said Parish to A. B. and after the Will made and published he doth Purchase other Lands in the said Parish and dyeth in this case and by this Devise A. B. shall not have the new Purchased Lands Yet by a new Publication of the Will after the Purchasing of such Lands they will pass to A. B. the Devisee Yea though he hath no Land in the said Parish at the Time of making the said Devise yet if afterwards he doth Purchase Lands in that Parish in this case such ne 〈…〉 Purchased Lands will pass by the said Devise because it shall in that case be intended that he meant to Purchase them Also if a Man hath some Lands in Fee-simple and other Lands only for Years in Dale and he Devise all all his Lands and Tenements in Dale by this Devise the Lands and Tenements he hath for Years doth not pass but if he hath no other Lands in Dale but those for Years in this case probably they will pass 7. A. Deviseth his Lands to M. his Wife until E his Daughter shall accomplish the Age of 21. Years the Reversion to the said E. and the Heirs of her Body upon Condition that she shall pay unto his said Wife during her Life in Recompence of her Dower of all his Lands 20 l. and upon default of Payment he wills his Wife shall enter and enjoy all the Lands during her life the Remainder ut supra the Remainder to I. S. in Tail and dies M. the Wife enters E. the Daughter being within the Age of 14. Years M. takes to Husband I. D. The Husband and
Wife came and demanded the 20 l. and none ready to pay it Whereupon the Husband and Wife brought a Writ of Devise and Recovered In this Case it was Resolved were the 20 l. Rent or a Sum in gross That by the bringing of the Writ of Dower the Wife of the Devisor had lost all the benefit which was to come to her by the Devise because the said Rent was Devised to her in Recompence of her Dower so that it was not the meaning of the Devisor that the Wife should have both In the Time of Queen Mary Benloes Serjeant moved this Case A Man Seized of Lands and Tenements in London devised them by these Words viz. I Will and bequeath unto my Wife A. my livelihood in London for Term of her Life and that by this Will the Lands in London pass to the Wife by this Word Livelihood Note for Brook Justice said That it was in ancient Time used so in divers places of this Realm and had been taken for an Inheritance Unto which Dyer also agreed A. having Two Sons by Two Wives devised his Land to I. his Eldest Son and his Heirs after the death of his Wife to whom he devised them for her Life The Question was Whether the Son should take them by Devise as a Purchasor or as Heir at Common Law by descent The Court held that the Devise was void and that it was not in the power of the Son to make Election to take by descent or by Purchase but he must of necessity take the Land as the Law directs which is by descent And it is against a Maxime of Law to give a Thing to such a person to whom the Law gives it if it had not been given A Man made his Will in these Words viz. I give and Bequeath one half of my Lands to my Wife and after her death I give all my Lands to the Heirs Males of any of my Sons or next of Kin. In this Case it was held That the Devise was void because of uncertainty and the words being in the disjunctive and we ought not to frame a Sense upon the Words of a Will where we cannot find out the Testators meaning Likewise it hath been adjudged That Lands devised to a Mans Issue was uncertain and therefore such Devise void If a Man hath in his Occupation several Farms together and then doth Devise one of the Farms called D. and all the Lands to the same belonging the other Farms shall not pass with it although they be occupied altogether If a Man doth Will and Devise That A. and B. his Feoffees shall stand Seised and be Seised to the use of I. S. for his Life the Remainder over c. when in Truth he hath no Feoffees It is a good Devise to I. S. by reason of the Intention Or if a Man make a Feofment to his own use and afterwards Devise That his Feoffees shall be Seised to the use of his Daughter A. who in Truth is a Bastard it is a good Devise of the Lands by Intention Three Brothers are of one Father and Mother the middle Brother Seised of Land Devisable giveth this by his Testament Propinquiori fratrisuo It seemeth that none of them shall have it Note it was held by the Justices That if a Man Seised in Fee of a Mannor and Lands Deviseth the same by his Will to his Son and afterwards in another part of the same Will deviseth a Third part of the same Lands to another of his Sons That they are Joynt-Tenants of the Lands And so if a Man in one part of his Will deviseth his Lands to A. in Fee and afterwards by another Clause in the same Will he deviseth the same Lands to another in Fee they are Joynt-Tenants Between B. and P. the Case was this I. W. being Seised of the Mannors of W. and C. in Socage made his Testament devised the Two Mannors in Form following viz. The Mannor of W. to the Eldest Son of R. F. his Cousin and his Heirs and further he devised the other Mannor to M. W. during her life and if she dies and then any of my Cousin F's Sons Living then I will my said Mannor of C. to him that shall have my Manner of W. R. F. had Two Sons G. and I. G. enters on the Mannor of W. and the said M. enters on the other Mannor After G. dies without Issue I. enters on the Mannor of W. and alienates the Fee thereof Afterwards M. dies I living The Question was Whether I. ought to have the M. of C. or not The Court agreed That he could not have it for that he was not such Person as was named or limited to take by the Will for that he had not the Mannor of W. at the Time of the decease of M. and therefore not the Person intended by the Will The Case was That R. P. Seised of divers Lands in A. and having Issue Four Daughters B. I. F. M. made his Will 27. Eliz. in Writing and thereby all his Land in A. he devised to B. and I. his Daughters and made them his Executrices and after in 33. Eliz. Purchased other Lands in A. which are the Lands in Question and after one I. S. came to the Devisor and desired that he would Sell unto him those Lands which he lately Purchased And he said No they shall go with my other Lands in A. to my Executrices Afterwards in 34. Eliz. he fell Sick the Will was read unto him and he said nothing thereto but then gave divers Legacies of Goods to others and caused them to be written and annexed in a Codicil thereto and dyed Whether these Lands newly Purchased shall pass to the Executrices by that Will was the Question viz. Whether by those words used to a Stranger or the annexing of a Codicil to the Will being only concerning Goods be as a new Publication of his Will to make these Lands to pass c. First It was agreed by the Council on both sides and by the Justices That if the Devisor after the Purchase of that Land had made new Publication of his Will and shewed his Intent that those Lands should pass it had been a good Devise of them For the Words in the Will are all his Lands in A. which are apt enough and sufficient to carry them and he could not have added more apt words thereto But afterwards all the Justices Gawdy absente held that it is a new Publication of his Will and sufficient by the words to I. S. For that shews his intent sufficiently and the Will writ hath words sufficient And Fenner held That the annexing of the Codicil thereto is a new Publication as to it For therein he Affirmed That it should be his Will at that Time But the other Justices doubted thereof because he doth not shew thereby any intent That this Will should be for his Purchased Lands nor that he then
or which if demolish'd the Kitchin or the Stable could not remain useful 31. If a House Devised with all the things in it It is to be understood only of those things that werein it when the Testament was made and not of those things which the Testator brought into it afterwards likewise if a House be Devised with all the things which shall be found in it when the Testator dyes it is not to be understood of such things as were brought into the House without the privity or knowledge of the Testator or which were casually and by chance brought into it Contrariwise such things as were casually carried out of the House shall not be excluded out of the said Legacy or Devise nor any moveable Goods in the House which are not momentaneous but ever remaining there as of Domestick use For which reason Debts upon Bills or Bonds Money and Wares designed for Merchandize and the like are not within the said Devise of a House with all things in it 32. If a man Devise his Chamber he is to be understood rather to have Devised the things belonging to the Chamber than the Place But if a man Devise his Drapers-Shop he is to be understood to have Devised rather the Place than the Wares therein For that the word Drapers serves only by way of Demonstration to to shew what shop he meant Otherwise if he say I Devise my Shop and Cloth in that case it shall be understood the Cloth in the Shop 33. If a man Devise a certain Field wherein any Edifice or Building doth stand that Building doth pass by such Devise of the Field if not expresly excepted in the Devise yea albeit the Edifice were Erected after the Testament was made but if the Field be Devised excepting the Edifice thereon the ground in case the Building should be demolished is likewise excepted out of such Devise 34. If a man should Devise the Fee of certain Lands to one and the Rents Profits and Issuers of the same Land to another and both in the same Will In this case by the Civil Law the Rents thereof are equally to be divided between the two Legataries 35. Suppose a man in his last Will and Testament saith I give unto my Wife the Tenement and 700 l. which I had with her in Marriage when as in truth he had but 600 l. with her beside the Tenement In this case she shall have 700 l. with the Tenement unless it can be sufficiently proved that the Testator did think or conceive that he had had 700 l. with her in which case there is only 600 l. and the Tenement due to her by the said Legacy or Devise 36. A Legacy or Devise may be inferr'd from the mind and intention as well as from the Express words of the Testator As thus A. B. constitutes his two Sons his Executors and in his Will sayes That they shall not in any case Alien the Leases and Rents which out of his Estate are about to come to them but shall preserve them for Succession viz. of their Children and ordered it so that he made his two Sons enter into Recognizance to observe his said Injunction accordingly and dyes The Successors of the said Sons claim and demand the said Rents and Leases by vertue of the said Devise They cannot De jure but after the decease of both the said Sons it shall come to their said Successors not before 37. The omission of the quality or description of a Devise in a Will albeit the Testator therein said he would insert the same doth not viciate or null the Devise Therefore if a man Devise certain Lands and Tenements with their Appurtenancee scituate nigh a Town to the Corporation thereof and in his Will saith Which Lands and Tenements with their Appurtenances I shall after in this my Will describe and set forth the just bounds and Limits thereof as also what I would have the said Corporation Annually to do in remembrance of me for and in consideration of this my Devise But being by death prevented doth neither of these the said Devise is notwithstanding good 38. If Land be Devised to A. B. and C. D. when A. B. is not in rerum natura C. D. shall have the whole 39. A Testor doth Devise certain Houses to A. B. after the death of his Executor and dyes the Houses happen to be burnt living the Executor and by him Re-edifyed the Executor dyes In this Case the Executors Executor is obliged to surrender the Houses to A. B. but he may deduct the charges of Rebuilding them if they were not burnt by any default of the first Executor otherwise not But if they were burnt in the Testators life time and by him Rebuilt or others erected in the same place In this case the Devise is void unless it appears that the Testators mind was otherwise But if they were only mended altered and repaired so often that there remains now nothing of them at the Testators death as when the Testament was made In such case the Devise is good The Law is the same in case of a Ship or other Vessel so often Repaired that little or nothing thereof now remains at the Testators death which was at the time of making the Testament 40. A. B. Possessed of certain Lands called the Millfields in one corner whereof stood a Little Vineyard made his Will and therein Devised in this manner viz. I give unto I. G. my Lands called the Millfields excepting the Vines which shall be therein at the time of my Decease A. B. after the making of the said Testament and before his death did cut down the Vines which were in the corner of the said ground and dyes The Question is whether the corner of the said ground where the Vineyard stood shall pass by this Devise It is held in the Affirmative grounded upon that Rule in Law Exceptio rei quae non reperitur nihil importat 41. A. B. By his last Will and Testament doth Devise a certain House to C. D. in case his Ship returns within a year safe home from the Straights makes his Executor and dyes The Executor doth Devise the same House to J. G. under another Condition Depending that other Condition the said year expires and the Ship not return'd from the Straights whereby the first Condition of the Devise to C. D. fails In this case the Devise made by the Executor under that other Condition if performed is good otherwise it would be in case the former Condition had been accomplished in which case the Devise made by the Executor would have been void 42. If a man Devise a certain parcel of ground and after Erect an Edifice thereon the Building or Superstructure as well as the ground doth pass by that Devise and the Devisee shall have them both because the Rule in Law is Quod aedificatur in area Legata
cedit Legato As we use to say Cujus est solum ejus est usque ad coelum 43. Suppose the Testator doth Devise one half of his Lands in Dale to A. B. and doth Devise the same half part of the same Lands to C. D. and doth Devise all his Lands in Dale to J. G. and so joyns them all in the thing and disjoyns them in and by the words In this case J. G. ought to have one Moiety of the Lands A. B. and C. D the other Moiety After C. D. dyes before the day of performance of the Devise by which means his part accrews to his Collegataries by way of Accression or as we say by way of Survivorship and not to his Heir nor Executor Therefore as J. G. had more in the Devise than A. B. so now he hath more than A. B. in that part of C. D. 44. A. B. Possessed of divers Lands and Tenements among which were certain Lands called Lillystones and so called time out of mind but in regard of its great Extent he did for the better and more Commodious Letting it to Farm divide it into two parts and called the one the Vpper Lillystones the other the Lower Lillystones A. B. makes his Will and therein gives divers Lands and Tenements to his Niece among which he gives Lillystones not saying whether the Upper or the Lower Lillystones The Question is whether his Niece shall have all the said Lillystones or onely one of the said divided parts thereof It is Resolved she shall have the whole unless the Executor of A. B. can prove the Testator intended her only one part thereof 45. A Testator makes his Son Executor and in his Will saith Let my Hop-yard at the lower end of my Orchard and my Ground in the Parish of D. suffice my Cosin A. B. It is a good Devise of the Ground and Hop-yard to A. B. So likewise if he had only said let my Cosin A. B. be contented with the said Ground and Hop-yard or with my House scituate in c. Note that in this case the person of the Devisee must not only as in all other Legacies be certain but also the Land Devised must by the Description of its scituation be reduced to an infallible certainty otherwise the Devise will be void 46. A. B. Rents certain Orchards at 20 l. per ann for the term of Seven years makes his Will therein gives the Fruit thereof for the residue of the term yet to come and unexpired unto C. D. orders his Executor to deliver him the Lease to suffer him to enjoy the Fruits of the said Orchards for during the term aforesaid In this case the Testators Executor shall pay the said Rent and suffer C. D. to enjoy the Fruits thereof otherwise the Legacy might be nothing worth or if Fruit fail worse than nothing 47. An Erroneous demonstration by a Testator of the scituation of Lands Devised by him shall not prejudice the Devise As thus The Testator in his Will saith I Devise my Lands of Cammerweli which are in Ireland unto my two Nephews A. B. and C. D. Also my Lands of Kirkaven which are in Scotland and dyes After the Testators death there are found certain Lands which belonged to him called Kirkaven but they are not in Scotland The Question is whether those Lands in the description of whose scituation the Testator was mistaken do belong to the Devisees It is answered in the Affirmative if it appear the Testator had any thoughts of Devising them at all 48. A Testator makes his Son Executor and in his Will Prohibits him from alienating or Mortgaging the Estate or any part thereof whereto he is entitled by such Executorship commanding him to preserve the same for his Children lawfully begotten and dyes The Son for 100 l. doth Mortgage or sell outright to A. B. such certain Tentments of the said Estate as his Father the Testator left at his death in Mortgage to C. D. for 100 l. and with the Proceed thereof pays off the said 100 l. to C. D. to whom his Father in his life time had Mortgaged the same The Question is whether the Sons Obligation or Alienation thereof to A. B. contrary to the Testators express command be good in Law It seems not because of the Testators Prohibition fortified with a Reason That he would have it left to his Children lawfully begotten but the Law is otherwise and ratifies the Sons Obligation or Alienation thereof to A. B. Because it was a necessary expedient and not of his voluntary choice the Law touching such Prohibitions extending only to voluntary not to necessary Alienations 49. A. B. makes his Will and therein Devises certain Lands and Tenements to his five Sons by Name under this Proviso or Condition That if either of them Alienated his part thereof to a Stranger that then that part so Alienated contrary to his Will should be and enure to the Crown for ever and dyes After Two of the Sons sell their parts to One of the other Three their Collegatories and dye He after makes A. B. a stranger his Executor gives him the said Two purchased parts and dyes The Question is whether the said Two parts belong to A. B. or to the surviving Collegataries that did not Alienate or to the Crown It is Resolved that they belong to A. B. and not to the Collegataries nor to the Crown Not to the Collegataries because the person of A. B. the stranger is not here to be considered but the person of the Purchaser who Devised it to him who according to the Testators mind was one of those to whom the Testator permitted or tacitely implyed a Sale might be made And it is only they not others that are prohibited to sell their own parts and therefore the parts which they purchase are not as those which they hold immediately from the Testator prohibited by the express command or tacite intent of the Deceased to be alienated to strangers Nor to the Crown because the Condition of the Devise viz. Alienation contrary to the Testators meaning without which the Crown is not entitled thereto is not existent for that the parts meant by the Testator were sold to their Collegatary and not to a Stranger to whom indeed they were afterwards Devised but not in derogation to the Testators sense and meaning because not the person of the Stranger Executor to the Purchaser as aforesaid but the person of the Purchaser himself is chiefly to be considered 50. Note That in a Bequest of Legacies the word or is not much a Note of Disjunction as of Augmentation comprehending both because in Disposition of Legacies the Law expatiates the Interpretation as far as it may have any consistency with the Testators mind and meaning and will take its measures from the utmost Latitude of his intentions For which reason if the Testator saith I give my City-house or my Countrey Farm to my Daughter
should Devise the. Immoveables only Indefinitely or design this Money only to be Let out at Interest There is a great quarrel among the DD. for this Engine of all mischief is of a very Metalsome quality whether Money actually out at Interest be within the notion of Moveables some affirm it others deny it comprising it under the notion of Debts which seems most rational But Money in Cash hath gain'd the more received opinion of its being comprehended within a Legacy of Moveables albeit it happen to be much in quantity or designed for a Purchase so as it be not for that end of a great quantity But in such Places where by common usage of Speech Houshold-goods are mainly and frequently meant or intended by the word Moveables or if it be such Money as was only designed by way of Trade for Merchandise the Testator being also a Merchant and the quantity be great or if the Testator bequeath all his Moveables in such a House excepting none at all In all such cases Money how acceptable soever it otherwise be yet is not admissable to any comprehension within a Legacy of Moveables Nor when any certain place is added to the Legacy as if the Testator should say I give my House to A. B. with all the things therein none excepted No Money found hid in the Wall of a House albeit the Testator should say be the Moveables of what kind or Condition soever 10. And as for Debts Bonds and Obligations for Money owing they are not within a Legacy of Moveables be the place where they are added or not added to the Legacy but make of themselves a third kind of Goods distinct from the former unless in such places where Custom prevails That Obligations touching things Moveable shall be computed among the Moveables and touching things Immoveable bequeathed among the Immoveables 11. If the Testator saith I give part of my Goods to A. B. he shall have the Moiety thereof for by saying a Part and not what Part the one half is regularly to be understood yea though the Testator himself had but the one half of the thing bequeathed yet the Legatary shall have a Moiety of that half and albeit the Testator should say a certain part But if he saith any part or what part soever then be it never so little the Legatary must therewith be content and the Executor is discharg'd 12. Lastly whatever was formerly said touching that Litigious subject of Money though by some formerly held as none of the Testators Goods or Chattels either Moveable or Immoveable yet now the Law understands Money better than to exclude it out of that notion and the opinion is now as Currant as Money it self That it is part of the Moveable Goods of the Deceased unless it be Money arising of the Sale of Lands Tenements Or Hereditaments appointed by the Testator in his last Will and Testament to be sold or Money comming of the Profits of the said Land for any time to be taken This Money is indeed by the Statutes of this Realm excluded from being reputed as any of the Goods or Chattels of the person so Deceased 13. Also by a Bequest of Moveables will pass the Industrial Fruits of the ground or such as are there sown by the Industry of Man in expectation of a speedy removal thence with increase But not the Natural Fruits or such as grow of their own accord without any great labour or cost for these are not reputed Moveables unless they were separated at the time of the Testators death Thus Trees and Grass together with the Land whereon they grow descend to the Heir as parcel of the Freehold But the Corn growing thereon belong to the Executor as part of the Testators Goods and Chattels 14. Where one bequeaths all his Goods and Chattels or all his Corn or all of any other thing by such bequest doth pass not only All the Testator hath of that thing at the time of making his Testament but also All he hath thereof at the time of his death And not only the All thereof which he hath in Possession but also what thereof he hath not in Possession but Expectation But if he limit this All to a certain place or as to or in the occupation of some certain person then no more will pass by such Bequest than what he hath in such Place or in the occupation of such a person at the time of making the Testament 15. And therefore a man may bequeath by Will not only those things which he hath at the time of making thereof but also such things as he is to have or may have afterwards Thence he may bequeath the Corn that shall grow in such Ground the next year after his death or the Wool or Lambs his Flook of Sheep shall yield the next year after his death But in case there shall be no such Corn Wool or Lambs the next year then the Legacy proves fruitless Yet if the Testator bequeaths 20 Quarters of Corn or 20 Lambs and doth Will that the same shall be paid out of the Corn that shall grow or out of his Flock the next year and there be no such Corn or not so many Lambs the next year yet the Devise is good and must be paid The Reason of the difference is because in the former Case there is such a Restriction and Limitation set to the Legacy as renders it questionable whether it might ever become due or payable In the latter there is only Demonstration how it shall be paid and nothing of any such Restriction as calls the Legacy it self into question In the former there is a tacite Condition in the latter the Legacy is Absolute CHAP. XXII Law-Cases touching Money Bequeathed by the Testator 1. IN the last precedent Chapter it hath been Examined how far Money may be comprised under the notion of Goods Moveable or Immoveable bequeathed It follows now that for the clearer illustration of this Desirable subject we insert certain Cases in the Law touching the same And because when Money is bequeathed it often happens that a more than ordinary power is given to or Latitude left in the Executor by the Testator It is requisite in the first place to see how far a Legacy of Money left to the will of an Executor is good or not which cannot well be Resolved without considering the several ways of disposal thereof as thus viz. 2. The Testator saith I would have 10 l. given to A. B. if my Executors mind were not against it In this case A. B. cannot have the 10 l. unless he can first obtain the Executors consent for it because a Legacy in that manner given is tacitely Conditional and first requires the Executors Approbation even by the Testators mind and intention for the performance thereof But if once the Executor gives his consent he must then pay the 10 l. and cannot
to all intents and purposes yet the Indenture referreth to that which did bear the name of a Will And although it was not a Will indeed it was not material A Feme Covert Executrix may without her Husbands consent make an Executor of those Goods she hath as Executrix Likewise she may make an Executor of the Things in Action due to her A Woman Covert may make a Testament if her Husband agree to it after her death And such albeit she be an Executrix cannot Devise any of the Goods she hath as Executrix without her Husbands consent or his agreement to it afterwards yet she may make an Executor thereof without his consent Likewise a Feme Covert cannot Devise things in Action which she hath without the consent and agreement of her said Husband If a Woman Covert die Intestate Administration may be committed of her Goods for possibly she had things in Action which are not given by the Law to her Husband D. 8 Eliz. 251. 90. Admitt CHAP. XI Of Persons Intestable by reason or for want of their Principal Senses HE that is both Deaf and Dumb by Nature can make no Testament or Last Will except it may appear upon good and sufficient ground that he doth understand what a Testament means and also that he hath Animum Testandi for if so then he may by plain significative tokens and signs declare his Testament But in case he be Deaf and Dumb only by accident he may if he be able write his Testament with his own hands or otherwise not being able to write yet having understanding he may as the other make his Will by signs else not at all Such as are only Deaf and not Dumb may make their Testaments Also such as are Dumb and not Deaf may write their own Testaments if they can otherwise they may make them by good and sufficient signs well known to the Witnesses then present Also a Blind man may make a Nuncupative Testament before a sufficient number of Witnesses but not a Written Testament unless the same being read to him before Witnesses he in their presence acknowledge the same for his Last Will and Testament So that the bare acknowledging thereof to be his Last Will without hearing the same read unto him is not sufficient CHAP. XII Of Persons Intestable by reason of some Criminal Convictions 1. Traytors Intestable from the time of the Crime committed 2. Felons not Intestable before Conviction 3. Hereticks Intestable till they reclaim their Heresie 4. Apostates Intestable 5. Incestuous Intestable saving to their Parents and Children 6. Sodomites are Intestable 7. Self-murderers Intestable under Limitations 8. Out-Laws and Excommunicates not absolutely Intestable 9. Outlawry in an Intestate no good Plea in Bar to a Creditors Action against his Administrator 1. TRaytors are Intestable for they lose both their Lives Lands and Goods whereof they were possessed at the time of the Treason committed or at any time after Insomuch that Traytors are Intestable not only from the time of their Conviction but also from the time of the Crime committed So that the Testament before made doth by reason of the conviction become void both in respect of Goods and also of Lands Tenements and Hereditaments Howbeit a Traytor that is pardoned and restored may make his Testament Neither shall such Goods as the Traytor hath as Executor to another be forfeited whence it follows that of such Goods he may make his Testament which also extends to persons Out-law'd for Debt also to persons attainted or convicted of Felony 2. Felons are likewise intestable being lawfully convicted for the Law hath otherwise disposed of their Lands and Goods But if a man be only Indicted of Felony and die before his Conviction or Attainder he may make his Testament both of Goods and Lands Or being Indicted and thereon Arraigned stands Mute and Dumb and will not Answer in this Case he forfeits only his Goods and therefore may make a Testament of his Lands And here Note that in respect of a Felons Lands the time of the Fact committed is to be respected but in respect of his goods the time of his Judgement So that he loseth his Lands from the time of committing the Fact but his Goods only from the time of Conviction insomuch that at any time before his Conviction he may bequeath sell or otherwise alienate his Goods and Chattels Howbeit if he make his Testament before his Condemnation it will be frustrated and prevented by his Judgement So that the Testament of a Felon convicted is void though he be never Executed void even by force of the Condemnation unless he afterwards doth obtain his pardon 3. Hereticks if they be Convicted or publickly Excommunicated cannot make a Testament of their Goods and Chattels But if they reclaim their Heresie they are not Intestable 4. Apostates or they who do wholly renounce the Christian Faith which once they did profess and do become Jews Turks or Infidels are worthily excluded by the Law from being capable of making a Last Will or Testament 5. Incestuous persons are prohibited to dispose of any Goods or Chattels by Will saving to their Children begotten in marriage that is in lawful marriage or to their Parents Brothers Sisters Unkles or Aunts Where by Parents understand all of each Sex in the right Line ascending and by Children all of each Sex in the same Line descending 6. Sodomites or such as are guilty of that wicked and abominable sin against Nature mentioned in the Holy Scripture are intestable and prohibited to bequeath their Goods or Chattels 7. Self-murderers or such as wilfully destroy themselves are intestable nor can they make any bequest of their Goods for they are all Confiscate Yet there are Those who distinguish between the kinds or rather the occasions of Self-murther viz. 1. That which is occasioned through the fear of Execution of a Judgement of Condemnation 2. That which is occasioned through a tired sense of a long tedious and irksome life 3. That which is occasioned through the pain and violence of some Disease In the first case it is said they lose like other Felons both Lands and Chattels in the second Chattels only in the third neither Lands nor Chattels 8. Out-lawed persons though out-lawed but in an Action personal forfeit all their Goods and Chattels and therefore cannot make any Testament thereof But the Out-lawed for Felony forfeiting their Lands as well as their Goods and Chattels cannot make any Testament of either Though the Out-lawed only in an Action personal may make his Testament of his Lands yet not so of his Goods and Chattels And as for Excommunicate persons if they be excommunicated for Heresie or other cause which renders them in it self legally intestable in such cause they cannot make
of Wills and Testaments afterwards to be made as if the Testator sayes Whatsoever Testament I shall hereafter make I will the same to be void and of no force In this case it is not infringed by a later Testament unless in that later there be mention thereof sufficiently made to amount unto a legal revocation of that former Testament or clause derogatory 5. If a man saith that he will revoke his Will hereafter which he hath made that is not any revocation without the doing of some other Act. Likewise if one saith that he will make a Feoffment thereof to another that is no revocation before it be done But if a man Devise Land to another by his Will in writing and after Devise it unto another per paroll albeit that is void as a Will yet it is a revocation of the former Will If a Devisor alien the Land Devised and afterwards repurchase the same Land yet the Will is revoked as to that Land 44 Ed. 3. 33. 44. Ass D. 3 4 P. M. 143. 55. Contra. 2 R. 3. 3. b. Trespass upon evidence where one hath made his Will in writing and devised his Land to A. and her heirs and afterwards being sick and lying upon his death-bed because A. did not come to visit him affirmed that A. should not have any part of his Lands or Goods It was held by all the Court that it was not any revocation of his Will being but by way of discourse and not mentioning his Will But the revocation ought to be by express words that he did revoke his Will and that she should not have his Lands given unto her by his Will or such like words which might shew his intent to make an express revocation thereof Ejectione Firmae Upon evidence to a Jury it was resolved by the Court and so delivered to the Jury that if one makes his Will in writing of Land and afterwards upon Communication saith That he hath made his Will but it shall not stand or I will alter my Will c. These words are not any revocation of the Will for they are words but in futuro and a declaration what he intends to do but if he saith I do revoke it and bear witness thereof he doth hereby absolutely declare his purpose to revoke it in praesenti and it is then a revocation Also Mountague said to the Jury and it was not denied by any other of the Justices That as one ought to be of a good and sane memorie at the disposing so ought he to be of as good and sane memory when he revokes it And as he ought to make a Will by his own Directions and not by Questions so ought he to revoke it of himself and not by Questions CHAP. XIX Of a Reviver of a Will Revoked 1. How a Will Revoked may be Revived 2. How an Executor Revoked may be Revived 3. How one may dye both Testate and Intestate 1. OF a Will Revoked there may be a Reviver by a new publication of that revoked Will also a Will revoked may without making a New Will be revived and set on foot again by annexing a Codicil thereunto or by adding any thing to the Will or by making a new Executor or by express speech and word that it shall stand good and be his Will yea and sometimes without either of these as thus A man makes his Will many years after he makes another then in his sickness both these Wills are put into his hands and being demanded which of these Two he will have to stand for his Last Will and Testament and being required to deliver back that which he will have to stand and to detain the other in his hands he delivers back the Will he first made possibly many years before the later In this case the former Will though once made void by the later is now revived again and shall stand as the parties Last Will and Testament 2. If one of the Executors Names be stricken out of the Will and afterwards a stet be written over it by the Testator or by his appointment he is then a revived Executor but then Note that if the stet shall stand good the Executors Name over which it is written ought not to be so blotted out but that it may be read and discerned otherwise the stet is over nothing at all Or if the Testator express by word in the presence of witnesses that the party put out shall yet be Executor he is then also a revived Executor Lastly if the verbal re-affirmance renew the Executorship then is the Will partly in Writing partly Nuncupative his Name not being to be found in the written Will for the appointing of the Executor doth create the Will though it hath not life till the Testators death which is Divinity as well as Law 3. If a man seized of Lands in Fee-simple dispose of the same or part thereof by his Will in writing it shall stand good for the whole or part according to the difference of Tenure though no Executor be named or appointed so that the party shall die Intestate as touching his Goods whereof Administration is to be committed yet shall have a Will as touching his Lands because Land is not properly Testamentary And so a Will may be good in part only But where the strictness of the Civil Law is observed there a man cannot die partly Testate and partly Intestate though here in England where that Ceremonial strictness is not observed but all immunities enjoyed being not obliged to any other observance in making of Testaments than what is Juris Gentium a man may thus and several other wayes die partly Testate and partly Intestate CHAP. XX. Of the Probate of Testaments 1. Where and before whom the Will is to be proved 2. By whom and at whose instance the Will is to be proved 3. When is the Will to be proved 4. How and in what manner is a Will to be proved 5. What are the Fees upon Probate of a Testament 6. Touching refusal to prove the Will 1. EVery Last Will and Testament after the Testators death ought to be duly Proved before a Competent Judge in the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction A Testament or Last Will is to be Proved before the Bishop of that Diocess within which the Testator had his Domicil or Habitation or before his Official unless by Custome or Prescription within certain Lordships or Mannors it appertains to the Chief Lord or unless the Testator died within some peculiar Jurisdiction in which case the Probation of the Testament may be Prescription or Composition belong to the Judge of the peculiar or unless the Testament be such as wherein only Lands Tenements and Hereditaments and no Goods be devised or unless the Testator had Bona Notabilia at his death in divers Diocesses in which Case the Probation of the Testament appertains to that Arch-Bishop within whose
if A. dies his Executors not his Heirs shall have it for it is no Inheritance Or if such a Termer grant a Rent out of the Land to A. and his Heirs or the Heirs Male of his body yet shall it go to the Executor not to the Heir for it being derived out of a Chattel it self remains a meer Chattel and becomes not any Inheritance Also if a Rent be granted out of Land to one in Fee-Simple Fee-Taile for Life or Years and it be not paid to him in his life-time the Arrerages shall go to his Executor not to his Heir Or if a man seized of Land and possessed of a stock of Cattel Let it for Years and Covenant with the Lessee that he pay to Him and his Wife their Heirs and Assigns one hundred pound per annum during the Term in this Case after the death of the Lessor his Wife surviving him her Executor and not his Heir shall receive this payment Again if A. grant the next Presentation of the Church of B. unto D. In this Case if D. dies his Executor shall have it as a Chattel Not the Heir Or if A. grant a Lease for years of Land to D. and his Heirs and dies his Executor and not his Heir shall have this Term. And if A. possessed of a Term of years of Land grant it by Deed or give it by Will to D. and his Heirs or to D. and his Heirs Males or devise it by Will to B. for life the remainder to D. and his Heirs in these Cases D. shall have these Terms of years as Chattels and after his death his Executor shall have them Also if a Lessee for life make a Lease for years absolutely This in Law is a Lease for so many years if the life live so long and shall go to the Executor after his death And if one makes a Feoffment in Fee of Land the Feoffee covenanting to do divers things to the Feoffor and to forfeit five pound to him and his Heirs as oft as he shall fail performance and the Feoffee doth fail and break his Covenant divers wayes and the Feoffor dieth in this case his Executor not his Heir shall have and recover all the Forfeitures that are past and unpaid Also if any Goods or Chattels be granted to any Heads of Bodies Politick and their Successors their Executors and not their Successors shall have them In like manner if a Lease for years be made to a Bishop and his Successors and he die his Executor not his Successor is to have it 4. Among the living Chattels Personal that go to the Executor may be comprehended an Apprentice for years the interest of a Debtor in Execution for debt and in a Prisoner taken Jure belli Also Cattel of all kind yea and Fishes in a Pond Conies in a Warren Deer in a Park Pigeons in a Dove-house where the Testator was but a Termer or Lessee thereof for then they are to go to his Executor as Accessory Chattel following the State of their Principal viz. the Pond Warren Park and Dove-house Or if the Conies Pigeons or Deer were all tame they are then likewise to go to the Executor and not to the Heir so likewise are Hawkes reclaimed yea it is felony to steal Hawkes young in the Nest which implyes that they are Goods and belong to the Executor 5. Chattels Personal without life and moveable as all Householdstuff Implements and Utensils Money Plate Jewels Corn Pulse Hay Wood felled Wares Merchandise Ships Carts Plows Coaches c. are evident to belong to the Executor not to the Heir And generally all things sowed and not arising from the Earth without manuring go to the Executorsâ— and such things as grow of themselves to the Heir therefore Corn in the field growing or standing shall go to the Executor Also Hops though not sowen if planted likewise Hemp and Saffron do like Corn growing pertain to the Executor Also after Corn reaped and before the Tythes set out the Inheritor of the Tythes dying his Executor and not his Heir seems to have the best right to the Tythe after set out Also things above ground in Gardens as Mellons of all kind and the like go to the Executor not to the Heir as also all other things as have such a yearly setting or manurance as severs them in interest from the soile Also the Writings and Evidences that concern not the inheritance but only Leases Terms Goods Chattels or Debts pertain to the Executor If one that holdeth Land for the Life of A. B. sow the Land and A. B. happen to die ere it be ripe and cut and he that so holdeth the Land happen to die also before it be ripe the Executor of the Tenant shall have the Corn. And if the Tenant in Tayl sow the Land he doth so hold and die ere it be cut the Executor not he in Reversion nor the Heir nor the Issue in Tayl shall have it Also if A. make a Feoffment of Land to B. excepting the Trees thereon which he afterwards grants to B. for years in this Case the Trees are in the nature of a Chattel and if B. dies his Executor shall enjoy them Or if A. seized in Fee of Lands whereon Trees grow sell these Trees to B. who then dies before they be felled in this Case the Executor or Administrator of B. shall have them and may sell or cut them down Lastly The Executor without contradiction of the Heir may in any convenient time after the Testators death enter into the house descended to the Heir for the removing and taking away of the Goods so as the door be open or at least the key be in the door but he cannot justifie the breaking open of the door of any Chamber to take Goods thence But if the Goods be not removed in convenient time the Heir may distrain them as Dammage Fesante 6. If a Lease for years be made to a Bishop and his Successors and he die his Executor not his Successor is to have it If a Presentment to a Church happen to a Tenant in Tayle and he die before he Presents his Executor not his Issue in Tayle shall Present because the Chattel is not devested Likewise if a Termer have a Presentment which doth happen during the Term though he do not Present yet he shall have it If a Parson Vicar Master of a Hospital or any Body Politick be possessed of any Goods or Chattels in their own Right and die they shall go to their Executors or Administrators not to their Successors If a Lease be made for years or the next Advowson of a Church or Covenant for payment of money or the like be granted or an Obligation made to one and to his Heirs In all these Cases he hath this as a Chattel and it shall go to his
also as Incapable of being Legataries But a person outlawed though depending the Outlawry against him he cannot Sue for his Legacy Yet he is not so properly said to be altogether Incapable of being a Legatary as of being Incapable of Suing for his Legacy unless the Outlawry be Reversed by some Error or discontinuance in the Suit or unless the party Outlawed were beyond the Seas at the time of the Outlawry being pronounced Or unless there were some defect on omission of the Three Proclamations in such Cases by the Stat. required Or unless his pardon be obtained wherein the words of the Pardon ought diligently to be considered For by force of the Outlawry the Legacy is forfeited and confiscate Likewise a person Excommunitate is not so Incapable of being a Legatary as unadmissable by the Ordinary to Commence any Suit for his Legacy during his persistency under such Sentence of Excommunication 3. If one Devise to an Infant in his Mothers Womb it is a good Devise otherwise it is by Feofment Grant or Gift For in those Cases there ought to be one of ability to take presently or otherwise it is void And if one Devise his Land to his Daughter and Heir Apparent in Fee-simple and the Wife of the Devisor be privily with child of a Son which is born after his death Then is the Devise become good for that now she is not Heir to her Father Also a Feme Covert may be a Competent Devisee or Legatary to her own Husband as to such Lands Goods or Chattels which he shall devise to her 4. Whereas Bastards whether Bastards in simple Fornication in Adultery or in Incest are without distinction incapable by the Civil Law of being Legataries yet understand this only where they are made Executors or Legataries to their own natural Parents for to any othets they may be Executors or Legataries Also by the Ecclesiastical Laws they are capable of being Legataries even to their Adulterous or Incestuous Parents so far as is needfull or necessary for their convenient sustentation or for their competent alimentation and relief Therefore have the Laws and Statutes of this Realm provided for the same purpose which do also permit every Man as well by Deed executed in his life time as by his last Will and Testament to be executed after his death to give or devise to any of their Bastards without distinction all their Lands Tenements Hereditaments without restraint And by the civil Law the lawful Children of Bastards may be Legataries to the Adulterous Grandfather but not to the Incestuous Grandfather If a man possessed of Goods devises the same to his Son when he shall attain to the Age of 21. Years and in case the Son dye before that Age then one of his Daughters to have the said Goods and the Son die before the said Age. The Question is Whether the Daughter shall have the Goods immediately upon and after the Sons death or whether she shall stay till the time that the Son should have been of that Age in case he had so long lived The opinion of all the Justices was That she shall have the goods immediately upon the Sons death A Man had Issue a Bastard and after Intermarries with the same Woman by whom he had that Bastard and hath Issue Two Sons by her and then Devised all his Goods to his Children It is by every one supposed That the Bastard shall have nothing for that he is Nullius Filius In that case it is clear that a Bastard shall not take by a Grant But Q. as to a Devise And if the Mother of the Bastard make such a Devise It is clear That the Bastard shall take thereby because he is certainly known to be the Child of his Mother CHAP. III. Of Words and Expressions sufficient for Legacies 1. Any Words whereby the Testators mind or meaning is express'd or implyed are sufficient for Legacies 2. Legacies are not destroyed by Words impertinently used by the Testator in the Bequest 3. That words carrying a false demonstration shall not vitiate and null the Legacy Also how this is to be understood 4. Whether a Legacy may be Bequeathed only by the Testators Signs Becks or Nodds when he can speak articulately 5. Whether a Legacy shall pass by Words only Implicatory of a contrary Condition 6. In point of Legacies the Testators meaning express'd by Words is more to be heeded then when implyed by Deeds 7. The Testators Words by Implication may be such as may make the Legacy greater Casually then he plainly express'd Originally 1. IF a Man in his last Will and Testament says I do give bequeath devise order or appoint to be paid given or delivered or my will pleasure or desire is That he shall have or receive or keep or retain or I Dispose or Assign or Leave such a thing to such a one or let such a person have such a thing or any other Words whereby the Testators Mind or Meaning of Bequeathing is expressed or sufficiently implyed shall be significant enough whereby the Legacy shall pass provided no other Legal Obstacle stand in the way because it is not in last Wills and Testaments as in Deeds for in Deeds the Words do fall under a stricter examinination then the intention or the mind but in Wills and Testaments the Testators Mind and Meaning is more valuable and of more efficacy in Construction then his Words so long as the Interpretation of his Mind and Meaning hold a Conformity with his words nor is oppugned by any other part of his last Will and Testament 2. A Testator in making a Bequest may possibly speak such words as may be very impertinent yea and in themselves altogether untrue and yet the Legacy not destroyed As thus viz. If I give and Bequeath my Field Long-acre to A. B. beyond above besides more then or over and above the Black Horse which I had of him in Consideration of the Ten pounds which he owed me This Long-acre is a good Devise or Legacy to A. B. albeit the Testator never had any such Black Horse of him and althongh he never owed him any such Ten pounds The Reason is because the said words above beyond c. in this sense and in this case are Inclusive and are so to be understood and interpreted So that 3. A false Demonstration shall not vitiate a Legacy Insomuch that if the Testator who hath Bequeathed nothing to A. B. do say That out of the Hundred pounds which I have Bequeathed to A. B. I de give Fifty to C. D. If in this case it be questioned whether any thing be due to A. B. And what is due to C. D. The Answer is That Fifty Pounds are due to G. D. although nothing be here Beqeathed to A. B. because a Legacy shall not be vitiated or nulled meerly by a false Demonstration But to A. B. nothing
whereof he dyed actually Possessed or Interessed in Expectancy in his own and not in anothers Right nor in Joynt-Tenancy with another saving in some certain Cases in the Law specially excepted are Deviseable As now also are Lands Tenements and Hereditaments whereof some are Deviseable by Custom as Gavelkind and Burgage Tenure others by virtue of certain Statutes But more specifically first as to Chattels Real all Leases in Lands or Houses either for Years or Years Determinable upon Life or Lives or by Extents Statutes or Recognizances or Rents not Rents reserved by the Inheritor yet the Arraerages of them also Likewise Commons Advowsons Tithes Faires Markets Profits of Leet and the like in the Testator for Years and all such Creatures as a Termer hath in a Warren Park Pond Dove-house or the like in the Testator for Years Secondly as to Chattels Personal all Debtors taken in Execution Captives Apprentices all Cattle of all kinds Creatures naturally Tame or being otherwise are by Act reduced thereto as Hawks reclaimed or the like also Hounds Greyhounds Spannels Mastiffs Ferrits and the like also all Merchandable Goods and Commodities whatever Likewise Ships and other Vessels Naval with their Guns Rigging Tackle Apparel Furniture and Provisions Likewise Weapons for War Books Musical Instruments and the like Also Corn whether in the Ground Field or Barn And Trees Fell'd or not Fell'd being Sold from the Inheritance of the Ground or excepted by the Seller of the Inheritance of the Land Also all other Grain as Corn Also Hops Saffron Hemp and the like whether on the Ground or in the House Likewise Hay and all Fruits gathered but not Grass ready to be cut for Hay nor Fruits on the Trees but such as are seperate from the Inheritance therefore not Garden-Fruits in the Ground or not seperate from it Also Bills Bonds Mortgages Statutes and the like Also Money Plate and Jewels Likewise all Householdstuff Implements and Utinsils not fixed to the Freehold All Coaches Carts Waggons Plows and the like with their Appurtenances Likewise Desks Cabinets Trunks Chests and Boxes Excepting such as contain only the Evidences of the Inheritance and have used so to do Also all Linnen Bedding Pewter Brass and Iron that is Moveable and not fastened to the Freehold as aforesaid Therefore not such Coppers Cesterns or Furnices nor Locks and Keys Waynscot or Window-glass Finally here Note That Things in Action as Debts or the like are Deviseable so are Obligations and Counterparts of Leases Likewise Uses not Executed by the Statute of Uses but remaining at the Common Law And though Actions altogether uncertain are not Deviseable yet possibilities and uncertainties in divers cases are Deviseable 2. In and by the Question Whether a Testator may Bequeath any thing which is anothers and not his own is meant and intended any thing wherein neither the Testator nor the Executor nor the Legatary hath any just Propriety or which doth not of Right belong to either of them Now in order to the Resolution of this Question according to the Civil Law discrepant from the Common Law in this point the known Distinction is That if the Testator did certainly know the thing Devised to belong unto another and not unto himself at the Time when he Devised the same Then such Devise is good and the Executor if there be Assets sufficient is to purchase the same and Deliver it to the Devisee Otherwise it is in case the Testator were Ignorant thereof and supposed it to be his own unless the True Owner consent to the Legacy or that it was Bequeathed to Pious used And in case the Owner thereof will not Sell the same at least not at any reasonable Rate the Executor is to pay the Legatary the just value thereof 3. Suppose a Testator doth Bequeath something that is his Executors In this case the Legatary shall have it whether the Testator did or did not know it to be his The Law is the same though there be Co-Executors and the thing so Bequeathed belong only to one of them But in that case they shall all bear a proportion to be allowed them in Assets but if Assets fail the Legacy fails also 4. If a Testator Bequeath to A. B. the same thing which did appertain to A. B. in his own proper Right at the Time when the Testament was made it is a void Devise yea though A. B. should afterwards alienate the Thing so as that the property thereof were out of him at the Time of the Testators death 5. Notwithstanding what hath hitherto been said according to the Civil Law yet by the Common Law the Goods and Chattels that are another Mans are not Deviseable and therefore if one Man gives or devises another Mans House it is a void Devise So also if one Devise the Things that by special Custom of some Places as the Heir-looms do belong to the Heir this Devise is void for it is not Devisable from him 6. The Law with us is so far from countenancing a Devise of what is another Mans that it doth not allow the Goods and Chattels which the Testator himself hath joyntly with another to be Devisable and therefore if there be Two Joynt-Tenants of Goods and Chattels as when such Things are given to Two or Two do Buy such Things together and one of them Devise his part of the Things to a Stranger This Devise is void Insomuch that if in this case the Testator make the other Joynt-Tenant his Executor the Will as to this is void and he shall not be charged as Executor for these Goods but he shall have them altogether by Survivorship Nay the Goods and Chattels which the Testator hath but not in his own Right but in Right of another are not Devisable And therefore an Administrator cannot Devise the Goods and Chattels he hath as Administrator for such Devise is void Howbeit an Executor may appoint an Executor of the Goods of the first Testator which an Administrator cannot do CHAP. VII Of Lands Deviseable by Will 1. Whether Lands are Deviseable what Lands and how much thereof 2. What things may be Bequeathed under a Devise of Lands and what not 3. What Persons incapable of Devising Lands 4. Who may be Devisees or what Persons may take by a Devise of Lands and what not 5. What kind of Testament sufficient for a Devise of Land and what not 1 LAnds Tenements and Hereditaments held in Gavelkind are Customarily Devisable by Will So likewise are Lands held in Burgage-tenure whereof the Will may be only Nuncupative and without Writing and into which the Devisee after the Testators death may enter without any Livery of Seysin thereof made unto him yet this shall not prevent Survivorship in case of Joynt-Tenancy in such Tenure And though by the Common Law of this Realm Lands Tenements and Hereditaments are not Devisable yet now by Statute they are if held in Socage
in the Womb at the Testators death seems to be void Yet if a Man Devise to such an Infant and he happen to be Born before the Testators death it seems that in this case the Devise is good Again A Devise made to a person altogether uncertain and not certainly Named or Described is altogether void yet a plain Description of a Person without naming him is sufficient so that a Devise made to the Dean of Pauls without naming him is good A Man Deviseth his Land to Elianor the Daughter of I. S. who hath divers Daughters whereof one is named Hellen and none Eleanor This is a good Devise to Hellen. Likewise if a Man hath Two Wives and he Deviseth his Land to his latter Wife in Fee the first Wife shall have it or if he hath Two Sons called John and one of them is a Bastard born before Marriage and he makes a Devise to his Son John the Legitimate John shall have it and not the Bastard The Husband can be no Devisee as to a Devise of Lands from his Wife There are Three Brothers by the same Father and Mother and the middle Brother Seized of Land Deviseable giveth it by his Testament Propinquiori fratri suo it seems that neither of them shall have it Suppose a Man who hath a Term Deviseth the Land to one and his Heirs the Devisee dyeth leaving Executors his Heirs shall have the Land and not his Executors the Law is otherwise in case the Entire Term were so Devised A Devise of Land made to the Canons of a certain Cathedral for ever or Canonicis Ecclesiae D. Pauli Lond. in perpetuum is a good Devise to all the Canons joyntly in Fee and the Survivor shall have the Entierty If a Man willeth that his Executors shall Sell his Land for the Payment of his Debts and they all die save one who maketh the Sale in this case the Vendee shall not have the Land the Law were otherwise if the Land had been Devised to the Executors to be Sold. If a Man hath Issue a Son and Land is Devised to the Father Habend sibi Hered de Corpore suo Legitime procreand and after the Devisee hath Issue another Son the second shall have the Land If a Man Deviseth by the Will That after the death of his Wife the Land Devisable shall go to I. S. his Wife shall have it for her Life by this Devise Or if a Man willeth that after 20. Years after the death of the Devisor I. S shall have the Land in Fee the Heir of the Devisor shall have the Land during the Term and not the Executor 5 A Testament Nuncupative is not good for a Devise of Land nor a Testament made in Print if it were never written yet a Testament written though no Executor be named therein is good for Lands but not for Goods Likewise a Testament without Sealing or Subscribing is good enough for a Devise of Land so as it be put into Writing in the Testators Life Time although it be never proved before the Ordinary But if in a Testament there are these words viz. Haec est voluntas intentio mea A. B. c. This is not good for the disposition or devise of Land without saying ultima voluntas according to the Lord Dyers Opinion who in his Learned Readings on the Stat. of Wills 32. and 38. H. 8. if he were indeed the Author of that Impression 1648. doth further Affirm That if a Man makes a Testament of his Land in one County and long after makes a Testament of his Land in another County These are good Also that if Two Men severally Seized of Lands make a Joynt-Testament of their Land This shall be good and several Testaments Also that where a man is in making his Testament and having Devised a parcel of his Land dies before the perfection and finishing thereof This shall be good for so much as is Devised That a Man willing by his Testament that his Lands shall be Sold to pay his Debts not declaring by whom This is a good Will and shall be performed by his Executors or Administrators That a Man making a Will of Land in which he hath nothing and after Purchaseth the same Land and dyeth This is not good That a Woman Covert making a Will of her Land and after taking a Husband who hath Issue the Husband dyeth the Wife dyeth this is not a good Will That if a Man make a Will of his Land and after alien this Land in Fee and after repurchaseth the same Land This is not a good Will That a Man making a Will and after making a new Will and after on his Death-bed saith That the first Will shall be his last Will This is good Also that where a Man giveth Land by his Will in Fee and after by another Will giveth the same Land to another but for Term of Life This is a Revocation of the Entire first Will. Also if a Man Devise another Mans Land This Devise is void but if he after the Devise made Purchase this Land then the Devise is good CHAP VIII Certain Cases touching Devises of Land Void or not 1. Lands What and how Devisable 2. Certain void Devises of Land 3. To what Persons and in what Cases Devises of Land may be good or not 4. The same Lands twice Devised to several Persons in the same Will how both Devises may stand good 5. The Profits of Land Devised do pass the Land it self in which Case Testaments more favourably construed then Deeds 6. How Lands Purchased after a Devise of Lands made may pass by that Devise or not 7. Several Cases in Law referring to this Subject 1. ALthough Lands made Devisable by Statute cannot be Devised otherwise then by Will in Writing yet Lands and Tenements Devisable by Custom may be Devised by a Nuncupative Will without any Writing But Copy-hold Land is not Devisable nor can Tenants in Tail or pur auter vie or Joynt-Tenants Devise their Eestate in the Land they so hold no more then they could before the making of the said Statute which doth not impower them thereunto But such as are Seized of Land in Common or Coparcenary may devise the same And if there be Two Joynt-Tenants for Life and the Fee-simple to one of them he that hath the Fee-simple may Devise his Fee-simple after the death of the other Joynt-Tenant for Life And in such places where Lands were Devisable by Custom before the making of the Stat. of 32. H. 8. a Devise of Lands may be good against the Heir for the whole but by the Stat. impowering to dispose of Lands by Will a Devise of Land is not good against the Heir save only for Two parts in Three 2. He that Deviseth Land ought to have a Right to and possession of the Land he Deviseth otherwise the Devise is not good and therefore if
Justices That this was a Condition for so was the Intent of the Devisor For otherwise the Younger Sister had no Remedy for the Rent And in this Case it was Adjudged That the Younger Sister might enter upon a Moity of the Land for breach of the Condition in Non-payment of the Rent for which the Action was brought A Man had Issue a Son and a Daughter and he Devised his Lands to his Son in Tail and if he dyed without Issue it should remain to the next of his Name r The Son dyed without Issue the Daughter being then Married The Question was whether she should have the Lands It was Resolved by the whole Court That she should not for that she had lost her Name by her Marriage But if she had not been Married at the Time of her Brothers death she should have had it for she was the next of Name A. B. Seised of Lands in Socage Devised the same by Words to his Three Sisters a Stranger present Recited the Testators words to him whereat he Affirmed the same Afterwards the Stranger for his own Remembrance puts the words into Writing but read them not to the Devisor before his death This Devise so Reduced into Writing mode forme is void because it was written without the order or direction of the Devisor and consequently not within the Statute But if after the writing thereof he had read the same to the Devisor and thereupon the Devisor had Affirmed the same it had then been a good Devise It was the Opinion of c. A. deviseth his Lands to W. after the decease of his Wife and if he fail then he willeth all his part to the discretion of his Father and dyed W. Survived the Father being dead before without any disposition of the Land In this Case the Father hath a Fee-simple there being no difference where the Devise is That I. S. shall do with the Land at his Pleasure and the Devise thereof to I. S. to do with it at his discretion A Man Seised of Lands in A. hath Issue four Daughters A. B. C. D. and devised all his Lands in A. to A. and B. Two of his Daughters and made them his Executrices Afterwards he Purchased other Lands in A. A Stranger being desirous to Buy this Land of him newly Purchased he refused saying That this Land should go with the Residue of his Land to his Executors as his other Lands should go Afterwards the Testator made a Codicil and caused it to be annexed to his Will but in the Codicil no mention was made of this new Purchased Land In this Case this new Purchased Land shall not pass For Notwithstanding that the Reading of the Will and the making of a Codicil may amount to a new Publication yet it doth not manifest the Intent of the Devisor to be that more shall pass by that then he intended at the first Also the new Reading of the Will and the annexing of a Codicil may not properly be termed a new Publication And without an express Publication for this Land newly Purchased this Land shall not pass A Man Let several Houses and Lands by several Leases for Years rendring several Rents amounting to 10 l. per annum and made his Will in this manner viz. I Bequeath the Rents of D. to my Wife for Life the Remainder over in Tail By this Devise the Land it self shall pass for it appears his Intent was to make a Devise of all his Lands and Tenements and that he intended to pass such an Estate as should have continuance for a longer time then the Leases should endure and the words are apt enough to convey the Lands it being an usual manner of speaking of some Men who name their Lands by their Rents A Man Devised Lands to another Man and his Heirs The Devisee dyed in the Life of the Devisor and then the Devisor dyed In this Case the Heirs shall not take by the Devise for that the Heirs are not named as words of Purchase but only to express and limit the Estate which the Devisee should have for without these words Heirs the Devisee could not have the Fee-simple and the Heirs are named only to Convey the Lands in Fee-simple and not to make any other to be Purchaser but the Devisee CHAP. IX Certain Cases touching Devises of Land in Fee-simple 1. A Fee-simple may pass by several Words and Expressions in a Will which will not pass it by Deed. 2. A Power to Sell Land Devised passeth the Fee-simple so doth the Devise of the Land without other words on the least Consideration of a Payment to be made by the Devisee 3. A Fee-simple will pass in a Will as well by the Implication as Expression of the Word Heirs 4. A nice Distinction between Joynt-Tenancy and Tenancy in Common 5. A Devise of Lands to a Corporation for Life is a Fee-simple and whether it may pass by the Word Assigns without the Word Heirs or the Words For ever 6. A Fee-simple passeth in a Will by Implication of a power to Sell the Lands as well as by Payment of Money enjoyn'd the Devisee 7. In what Sense the Habendum shall be Construed where the Devise of Lands seems somewhat doubtful 8. In what Case a Fee-simple and all the Testators Inheritances may pass by General Words to the Devisee 9. A Devise in Fee made to one cannot in the same Will be made to another 10. How the Word Paying doth Create a Fee in a Devise and bow by a Devise of Rents the Land it self doth pass 11. A Devise shall be for the Dvisees Benefit not Prejudice also in what other Case a Fee shall pass by Implication 12. In what Case and by what Words the Fee and not Leases or the Leases and not Fee do pass by a Devise 13. Other Cases in Law touching this Subject 1. THere are many Words and Expressions whereby Lands will pass in Fee-simple by a Will which by a Deed will not so Convey the same As suppose a Man devise his Land in this manner viz. I give my Land in Dale to A. B. and his Heirs or to A. B. in Fee or to A. B. for ever or to A. B. Habendum sibi suis or to A. B. and his Assigns forever or to A. B. to give away or Sell or do therewith at his Pleasure All these and such like in a Will Create a Fee-simple Estate and A. B. shall have the Land to him and his Heirs for ever yet by such words in a Deed no more will pass then an Estate for Life save only in the first Case Also if any now since the making of the Statute of Uses Devise that the Feoffees of his Land shall be Seized of the Land to the Use of B. C. and his Heirs or to the Use of B. C and the Heirs of his Body or that his Feoffees shall make an Estate of the Land to B.
8. A Man Seised of a Messuage holden in Socage in Fee Devised the same by these words I Devise my Messuage where I dwell to A. B. and her Assigns for 10. Years and A. B. shall have all my Inheritances if the Law will In this Case the Devise in Fee of the Messuage is good and by the general words of the Will all his Inheritances do also pass 9. If a Man Devise Lands to one for ever there he hath a Fee for such an Estate might be conveyed by Act Executed But if he further Devise That if the Devisee do such an Act that then another shall have the Land to him and his Heirs the same is void for when as he hath disposed of the Estate in Fee to one he hath not power after in the same Will to dispose the same to another it being a Rule in Law That such an Estate which cannot by the Rules of the Common Law be conveyed by Grant Executed in his life time by Advice of Council learned in the Law such an Estate cannot be Devised by the Will of a Man who is presumed to be void of Council 10. A Man having Lands in Fee-simple and goods to the Value of 5 l. only Devised to his Wife all his Estate paying his Debts and Legacies his Debts and Legacies amounting to 40 l. It was Adjuged in this Case That all his Lands did pass by the Devise and that the Devisee had a Fee-simple in the Lands the word Paying enforcing it for they are to be paid presently which cannot be if the Lands pass not in Fee And if a Man Deviseth all his Rents It was held That all his Lands do pass 11. Note That by intendment of Law a Devise shall be for the benefit of the Devisee and not to his prejudice As if Land to the Value of 3 l. per annum be Devised to A. and that A. shall pay out of it 50 s. per annum In this Case A. hath but an Estate for life for he may pay it out of the Profits of the Lands and is sure to be at no loss But if it be Devised to B. for life the Remainder to A. paying 50 s. per annum out of it In this Case A. hath a Fee-simple by Implication because after the Payment thereof A. may dye before he can receive satisfaction for the same out of the Profits of the Land and therefore such Devise shall be a Fee-simple because the Law intends that the Devise was for the benefit of the Devisee 12. Note also That if a Man hath Lands in Fee and Lands for Years and he Deviseth all his Lands and Tenements the Fee-simple Lands pass only and not the Lease for Years 2 If a Man hath a Lease for Years and no Freehold and Deviseth all his Lands and Tenements the Lease for Years passeth 3 That if one Deviseth his Lands which he hath by Lease to his Executor for life the Remainder over that there ought to be a special Assent thereunto by the Executors as to a Legacy otherwise it is not Executed 13. A. Devised his Lands in London to his Son and his Heirs after the decease of his Wife and in Case his Daughter should Survive his Wife and his Son and his Heirs that then the Daughters should have it for Life and after their death I. and R. should have the same and that they should pay 6 l. 16 s. yearly to the Company of Merchant-Taylors to be disposed of to Charitable Uses In this Case three Points were Argued 1 Whether the Wife had an Estate for life by Implication of the Will And it was Resolved That she had 2 Whether the Son had a Fee-simple or Fee-tail And it was Resolved That he had a Fee-tail by Implication of these words viz. if his Daughters Survive his Wife and his Son and his Heirs whereby it is plainly implyed That the Heirs there intended are the Heirs of his Body and not his Heirs in Fee for so long as the Daughters live the Son could not dye without a Collateral Heir 3 What Estate I. and R. have after the death of the Daughters And as to That it was Resolved That they have a Fee-simple by Reason of the Annual Payment of Money and it is not to be regarded what Annual Value the Land is of over and above the Sums they pay for every Sum of Money paid or payable doth cause the Devisee to have a Fee-simple And Coke Chief Justice said That a Devise to A. and his Successors is a Devise of a Fee-simple without the word Heirs because it implyes a Fee-simple although it wants the express words Between L. Plaintiff and B. Defendant L. Seised of Land in Fee Devised it unto Two Persons Equaliter and to their Heirs Whether this made them Joynt-Tenants or Tenants in Common was the Question It was holden by the whole Court That they were Joynt-Tenants and not Tenants in Common A Man Seised of Lands Devised them by his Testament to his Wife to dispose and imploy them for her and his Sons at her own Will and Pleasure And it was held by Dyer Weston and Welch That she had a Fee by such words as if he had Devised the Lands for ever For the Construction of Law supplies the defect in these words of the Devisor according to his meaning And it was held by Dyer and Welch That the Estate in her is Conditional because these words ea intentione make a Condition in every Devise but not in a Feofment Gift or Grant unless it be in Case of the King And these words do amount as much as to say she should not convey it away to a Stranger but keep it and give it to his Sons S. Seised of Land in Fee holden in Socage and Devisable in Gavelkind Devised it to his Feme for her life paying 3 l. per annum to T. his Son during his life and that he should take but Two Load of Wood for Fire-boot And if she dyed before the said T. then he Devised all his Lands to R. his Son paying to the said T. 3 l. per annum and paying to such one of his Sisters 20 s. and to another Sister 20 s. The Feme dyes R. enters The Question was what Estate R. had by this Devise And it was Adjudged he had a Fee For when he Devised it to his Feme for life expresly c. and to R. generally without limiting the Estate and apppointed him to pay to T. 3 l. per annum during his life That carries in it an Intendment that he should have Fee especially when his Father therein further willed That his Son R. should pay two other Sums in Gross and none of them to be out of the Profits it is by Intendment and by Implication a Fee wherefore upon the first Argument it was Adjudged for the Defendant for they said That these Things which have been so often Adjudged ought
and that this doth but set forth the Time when the Estate of A. B. shall begin and that the Intent of the Testator is That his Heir shall have it until that Time The Reason of the difference is because a Man is bound to provide for his own not so for a Stranger and so the Law presumes what Nature doth teach 6. If one Devise his Land in this manner viz. I give my Land in D. to A. B. to the intent that with the Profits thereof he shall bring up my Child or my Children or to the intent that with the Profits thereof he shall pay to I. M. 10 l. or to the intent that out of the Profits thereof he shall pay yearly 10 l. By these Devises A. B. hath only an Estate for life albeit the Payments to be made be greater than the Rents of the Land Otherwise it is in case the Sum of Money is to be paid presently and not appointed to be paid out of the Profits of the Land in which case A. B. should have a Fee-simple in the Land 7. If the Father of A. be Tenant for life of Land the Remainder to A. in Fee And A. devise the Land to his Wife Rendring for her natural life 5 l. to the right Heir of the Father of A. by this Devise the Wife of A. hath an Estate for life after the death of his Father 8. Land was Devised to Husband and Wife and after their decease to their Children they then having Issue a Son and a Daughter In this case the Husband and Wife have but an Estate for Term of their lives the Remainder to their Children for life and no Estate Tail for the intent of the Testator here shall be construed according to the Rules of the Common Law and by the Common Law the Husband and Wife have but an Estate for their lives with a Remainder to their Children for their lives 9. The Son Seised of a Remainder in Fee after the death of his Father who was Tenant for life devised the same by these Words viz. I Devise to D. my Wife the Lands which I have or may have in Reversion after the death of my Father paying therefore yearly during her life to the right Heirs of my Father 40 s. and dyed his Father living It was the Opinion of the Court That no Estate passed by this Devise but for Term of the life of the Wife and that she should not pay the 40 s. until the Reversion did fall after the death of the Father 10. A. Seised of divers Lands in A. B. and C. the Lands in C. being in him by Mortgage forfeited Devised the Lands in A. and B. to several Persons and then adds this Clause in his Will All the rest of the Goods Chattels Leases Estates Mortgages whereof he was possessed he devised to his Wife after his Debts and Legacies paid made his Wife his Executrix and dyed The Wife entered into the Mortgaged Lands and devised it to the Defendant and his Heirs and dyed The Question was whether the Fee passed to the Wife by this Devise by the Name of all his Estate Mortgages c. It was the Opinion of the whole Court That an Estate for life only passed unto her and not a Fee by Implication of the general words in the Will 11. Note That there is a difference when one Deviseth his Term for life the Remainder over and when a Man Deviseth the Land or his Lease or Farm or the Occupation or Use or Profits of his Land For in a Will the intent and meaning of the Devisor is to be observed and the Law makes construction of the Words to answer and satisfie his intent and puts them into such order that his Will shall take effect And when a Man deviseth his Lease to one for life it is as much as to say He shall have so many Years in it as he shall live and that if he dyeth within the Term that another shall have it for the Residue of the Years And although at the beginning it is uncertain how may Years he shall live yet when he dyeth it is certain how many Years he hath lived and how many Years the other shall have and so by a subsequent Act all is made certain A Man made his Will in this manner Item I give my Mannor of Dale to my second Son Item I give my Mannor of Sale to my said Son and his Heirs what Estate he had in the Mannor of Dale was the Question It was held by Dyer Weston and Welch That in the first he had but an Estate for life for that it is as much as to say as if he would give his Mannor of Dale to him for his life for that as much is included therein without saying His Heirs And that Item seems a new Gift to a greater degree in the second place to make amends for the other Brown e Contra and that the Item is a Conjuntion Copulative and that the word Heirs expressed in the latter Clause extends to both the Mannors But if the Word Heirs were put in the Gift of the former Lands it would be otherwise Dyer if in the first place or Clause there were not any person named but that the words were Item I give the Mannor of D. Item I give the Mannor of S. to I. K. and his Heirs there and in that Case it would refer to both the Mannors W. C. by his Will Devised a Messuage in these words viz. I give to A. L. my Cousin the Fee-simple of my House and after her decease to W. her Son The Judges held That A. L. had an Estate for life and her Son a Fee-simple in Remainder And so it was adjudged R. D. Seised in Fee of a House and Possess'd of Goods made his Will in these words viz. The rest of my Goods Lands and Moveables whatsoever after my Debts Legacies and Funeralls paid to my Three Children I. T. and M. equally to be divided amongst them And it was Adjudged That they have an Estate only for life in the House and are Tenants in Common not Joynt-tenants CHAP. XII Certain Cases in the Law touching Devises of Leases or for a Term of Years 1. In what Case the Word Shall is taken for Should in Devise of a Term. 2. A Devise of Lands for 99. Years may be only for no more of that Term then the Issue Male of the Devisee shall continue 3. The Devise of a Term to one and his Heirs shall go to the Devisees Executors or Administrators and not to his Heirs 4. Chattel-Leases and Leases for Years pass not by a Devise of all his Lands and Tenements 5. By a Lease for Years Devised for Life doth pass the whole Term yet is it not an Estate for Life 6. The whole Interest of a Lessee in his Lease-Lands doth pass by a Devise of his Lease Term Farm Profits Tenure or Occupation thereof as
well as by any other words 7. The Residue of a Term is as the Term it self 8. A Man may Devise such an Estate by Will which he cannot make by Act Executed Or he may Create an Interest by his Will which by Grant or Conveyance in his life time he could not do 9. That may be the Devise of a Lease for Years in Law which doth not seem to appear such in Fact 10. The whole Term though not named shall pass by a Devise where no other can pass by Implication 1. IF one Devise his Land unto his Executors until his Son shall come unto the Age of 21. Years the Profits to be imployed towards the performance of his Will and when he shall come to that Age that then his Son and his Heirs shall have it By this Devise the Executors shall have it until he be of 21. years of Age and if he die before that time the Executors shall also have it until the time he should have been 21. Years of Age if he had lived so long and the word Shall in this case is taken for Should Likewise if one Devise his Land to his Executors for the payment of his Debts and until his Debts be paid by this Devise the Executors have but a Chattel and an uncertain Interest and they and their Executors shall hold it until the Debts be paid and no longer 2. If one Devise his Land to A. B. and the Heirs males of his Body for the Term of 99. Years it seems that by this Devise A. B. hath but a Lease for so many Years if the Heirs Males of his Body shall so long continue and that for want of Issue Male the Term of Years shall expire And in this case the Executor or Administrator not the Heirs Males of A. B. shall have it after his death 3. If one possessed of a Term of Years Devise the same to another and his Heirs or his Heirs Male by this Devise the Executors or Administrators not the Heirs of the Legatee shall have it So that if a Lessee for Years of Land Devise all his Interest therein to his Wife if she live so long and after her death if any part of the Term be to come Devise the same to A. B. his Son and to the Heirs of his Body in this Case and by this Devise the Executors or Administrators of A. B. and not his Heirs shall have it 4. If a Man Devise all his Lands and Tenements in D. yet Leases for Years do not pass by these words for by Lands and Tenements is intended Frank-tenements or Free-hold and not Chattels 5. If one hath a Lease for Years of Land and Devise it to A. B. for life by this Devise the whole Term is Devised and A. B. shall have the whole Term if he live so long and yet A. B. shall not have an Estate for life by this Devise So likewise the Law seems to be the same upon a Grant by Deed made in that manner And if a Man possessed of a Term of Years of Land Devise his Term or his Lease or the Land it self by a Devise in either of these words the whole Term doth pass A Term of Years is Devised to the Church-wardens of the Church of D. and to their Successors This is not good but for Goods so Devised the Law is otherwise A Man who hath a Term Deviseth the Land to one and his Heirs the Devisee dyeth and hath Executors his Heirs shall have the Land and not his Executors The Law is otherwise if the entire Term were so Devised 6. If a Lessee Devise his Lease or his Term or his Farm or his Profits Tenure or Occupation thereof by either of these Devises his whole Lease and all his Interest in the Land is bequeathed as well as by any other form of words But if a Man Devise his Land only for so many Years as his Executor shall name it seems this Devise is not good Yet if it be for so many Years as A. B. shall name and he name a certain Number of Years in the Testators Life Time this is a good Devise 7 A Man possessed of a Term of Years may Devise all the Residue of that Term of Years that shall be to come at the Time of his death And if a Testator having only a Term of Years in certain Lands doth Devise the said Land to A. B. and doth not say for what Time it seems that by this Devise the whole Term is devised unless the Testators Intent doth appear to be otherwise 8. A Man possessed of a Term for 40. Years by his Will Deviseth the same to I. S. after the death of his Wife and that the Wife should enjoy it during her life and that I. S. should neither Devise it nor Sell it but leave it to descend to his Son and in the mean Time my Will is That my Wife shall have the use thereof during her life yielding 10 l. Yearly to I. S. during her life at Two Feasts and made his Wife Executrix and dyed The Wife entered and paid the 10 l. Yearly according to the Will In this Case Three Points are Resolved 1 That I. S. doth not take by way of Remainder but by way of Executory Devise And a Man may Devise such an Estate by his Will which he cannot make by Act executed And that the Case is no more but this That after the death of I. S. the Wife should have the Residue of the Term. 2 The Devise is good being but a Chattel which may vest and devest at the pleasure of the Devisor 3 That there is no difference when one Deviseth his Term the Remainder over and when a Man Deviseth his Land or his Lease or the Use or Occupation or the Profits of his Land That a Man by his Will may Create an Interest which by Grant or Conveyance he cannot Create in his life Time 9. A. Devised his Lands to his Daughter and her Heirs when she came to the Age of 18. Years and that the Wife should take the Profits of the Land to her Use without any accompt to be made until the Daughter come to 18. Years and made his Wife his Executrix and dyed provided the Wife should pay the old Rents and find the Daughter at School the Wife enters proves the Will takes Husband and dyes It was found that all the Conditions were performed and that the Daughter was within the Age of 18. Years It was Resolved in this Case That it was a Term for Years in the Wife and a good Lease 10. A Man was Lessee for 40. Years of a House and by his Will gave the House to I. S. without limiting any Estate That he should have in it It was the Opinion of the Court That he should have the whole for no other Estate in the House either for Life or at Will shall pass by Implication or for one Year
the Devise of a House with all things therein 32. The Difference between a Devise of a Chamber and the Devise of a Shop 33. The Devise of a Field carries also the Edifice erected thereon 34. The Civil Law where the Fee of Land is Devised to one and the Rents of the same Land to another 35. in what Case an error or mistake in the Testator may be a prejudice to the Legatee 36. A Legacy or Devise may be inferr'd as well from the Testators Intention as Expression 37. A Devise by Reason of an Omission of that whereof the Testator said he would make a description is not void 38. A Legacy to Two whereof one is not accrews in the whole to the other that is 39. Further Exemplifications of Law touching Devise of Houses altered burnt and re-edified 40. An Exception of a Thing which is not is no prejudice to the Devisee 41. The same thing Conditionally twice Devised by two Testators to several Persons how or in what Case good to either or not 42. By a Devise of ground doth pass the Edifice thereon albeit it were erected after the Devise made 43. How a Devise is to be apportioned where the Devisees are joyned in the thing Devised but disjoyned in the manner of Devising 44. A Devise of Lands by a certain Name carries all of that Name though otherwise distinct unless the Testator intended otherwise 45. Any words that do but plainly declare the Testators meaning may serve for a Devise 46. The Executor shall pay the Land-lords Rent for Ground in Lease the Fruit or Proceed whereof is Devised to another for the Term. 47. A mistake in the Testator only of the Scituation of the Lands Devised shall not prejudice the Devise 48. The difference between necessary and voluntary Alienations prohibited to Devisees by a Testator 49 A Tripartite Case in point of Alienation prohibited by a Testator 50. How the disjunctive Or in Legacies and Devises is frequently understood for the conjunctive And. WHere a Man is Seised of a House in Fee or of Land in Fee and may devise such House or Land in such case may Devise the Doors Windows Wainscot or the like Incidents of the House also the Trees and Grass growing upon such Land Otherwise it is with a Tenant in Tail for Life or Years in Houses or Land 2 If a man hath an Use that is not Executed by the Stat. of Uses but remains at the Common Law he may make a good Devise thereof And therefore if one possessed of a Term of years grant it over to another to the use of the Grantor he may Dispose this use by his Will for it is in the Nature of a Chattel 3. One that hath Money to be paid him on a Mortgage may Devise this Money when it comes If A. Enfeoffe B. of Land upon Condition that if B. do not pay A. 100 l. such a day that then A. may Re-enter In this case A. may Devise this 100 l. if it be paid and the Legacy is good albeit it be made before the day of Payment come 4. A Man cannot Devisc by his Will any Real Chattels that he hath only in right of his Wife nor the Obligations that are made to her alone before or during the Coverture nor the Chattels Real or Personal which she hath in right only of another as Executrix But all her own proper Goods and Chattels Personal and all Obligations made to them both during Coverture he may Devise by Testament 5. A Bishop cannot by his Testament Devise the Presentation of a Church that became void in his time yet if he or the Parson of a Church have the Advowson thereof in Fee and Devise that Two or Three of his Executors shall present at the next Avoidance this is a good Devise 6. By a Devise of Immoveables which are Chattels real do pass Leases Rents and the like and by a Bequest of Moveables which are Chattels Personal will pass Bonds and Specialties but Debts pass not by either of these Devises By Immoveables are understood not only the foresaid Chattels-real but also in some sense Trees growing on the Ground Fruit on the Trees Terms of Years and the like and by Moveables are Regularly understood all Goods both Actually Moving and Passively Moveable 7. If a Man Bequeath to A. B. all his Goods he shall thereby have the Testators whole Estate his Lands Tenements and Freehold excepted and thereby the Debts and Money If he Bequeath to him all his Chattels he shall have thereby all as in the former Case If he Bequeath to him all his Moveables he shall have all his Personal Goods both quick and dead and if he Beqneath to him all his Immoveables he shall have all the Testators Leases and all the Natural Fruits thereof as Grass on the Ground Fruit on the Trees and the like consequently Fishes in a Pond Pidgeons in the Dovehouse c. as Appurtenances to the Ground Devised as well as the Natural Fruits or Grass growing on the same 8. If a Man Devise all his Goods and Chattels to A. B. and die and A. B. die also before he hath proved the Testators Will in this Case the Administration of the Goods and Chattels of the said Testator shall be committed to the next of Kin of the said A. B. and not to the next of Kin of the said Testator because in this Case A. B. was the universal Successor 9. If a Woman under Coverture Devise her Land then publish and approve it after her her Husbands death when she is sole by this means that Devise which was Originally void is now become good But if she make and publish it during the Coverture albeit her Husband doth afterward die and she become sole yet this accident alone without a new publication after her Husbands death will not make that Devise good The Law is the same as to Goods and Chattels 10. In like Manner if an Infant within Age as to Lands or within Age as to Goods Devise the one or Bequeath the other and publish the Will and after he come to full and competent Age publish and Approve it again By this means the Devise or Legacy becomes good otherwise it is in Case he do not Publish and Approve it when he attains to Full and Competent Age. 11. Suppose the Testator doth Devise in this manner viz. I Will that my Executor shall pay 100 l. to A. B. by the Tenth day of March next after my decease and if otherwise then my Will is That my Executor shall Surrender to him all the Right I have in a Lease of my Ground called Black-acre and dies The Executor doth not pay to A. B. above 90 l. by the day Appointed In this Case A. B. restoring the said 90 l. to the Executor shall have the said Ground and he may detain the Money till he recover the Land 12. Suppose the Testator doth Devise the
there A Stranger Disseises the Devisor if he die before Re-entry the Devise is void If there be divers Devises of one thing in the same Will the last Devise shall take effect Co. Lit. 112. b. If a Man Seised in Fee Devise the same to I. S. in Fee and afterwards makes a Lease thereof to I. D. for Years this is no Revocation of the Fee but only during the Years Also if afterwards he devise that Lease to another for Life yet that is not any Revocation of the Fee but only during the Estate for Life If a Man possessed of a Term for 40. Years Devise the same to his Wife and after Lease the Land to another for 20. Years and die that Lease is not a Revocation of the whole Estate but only during the 20. Years and the Wife shall have the Residue by the Devise It appears therefore that a Legacy may indirectly and by Implication be Revoked as well as directly and expresly also in part as well as in whole and the Will may stand where Legacies in that Will do not In a Replevin upon Evidence given the Case was this I. W. was Seised of the Lands in Question and of divers other Lands and by his last Will Devised all his Lands and Tenements to A. W. of London in Fee After which he made a Feofment in Fee of the same Lands which he had Devised to the said A. and when he Sealed the Feofment he demanded and said will not this hurt my Will To which it was Answered That it would not And he said If this will not hurt my Will I will Seal it and then he Sealed it and a Letter of Atturney to make Livery The Atturney made Livery in some of the Lands but not in the Lands in Question afterwards the Testator dyed It was said That the Feofment was a Revocation for if the Testator had said That this shall not be his Will then it had been a plain Revocation and then the making of the Feofment is as much as to say That the Will shall not stand But it was Answered and Resolved by the whole Court That it Appeared That the mind of the Testator was That his Will should stand and when he made the Feofment this was a Revocation in Law and here is no Revocation in Deed For he said If this will not hurt my Will I will Seal it And although that the Atturney made Livery in part so as the Feofment was perfect in part yet for the Lands in Question whereof no Livery was made the Will shall stand for a Will may be effectual for part and for part it may be Revoked and the Court told the Jury That this was their Opinion and the Jury found accordingly The Case in Chancery was this C. E. the Testator 15. Jac. made his Will in Writing and thereby Devised Legacies to Charitable Uses and to R. and W. his Brothers viz. to one 100 l. and to the other 1000 l. and other Legacies to his Kindred and made his Wife his Executrix and Appointed his two Brothers to be joyned with her as Executors in Trust for his Wife afterwards 22. Jac. he sent for several Persons to come to him when they came they demanded of him What Friend he thought best to be his Executor and to see his Will performed and whether he Trusted any Person more than his Wife He Answered That his Wife was the fittest Person and therefore should be his Sole Executrix Being then moved to give other Legacies to his Father Brethren and Kindred He Answered He would not leave them any thing But Bequeathed to I. S. his God-son 30 s. And being Requested by his Wife to give him a greater Legacy He Answered Thou knowest not what thou doest do not wrong thy self 30 s. is Money in a Poor Bodies Purse And the Testator spake these words Animo Testandi ultimam voluntatem declarandi And all this was set down in a Codicil And the first Will and the Codicil was proved in Communi forma Whether this Codicil was a Revocation of the Legacy given to the Two Brothers was the Question It was Resolved both by the Civilians and by the Judges of the Common Law That it was not a Revocation of the Legacies Their Reasons were Because there was an Absolute Formal Will made in his Health and there being no Speech made by him of his Formal Will nor of the Legacies thereby Devised The Answer to a Doubtful Question shall not take the Legacies before Devised And his Answering I will not give them any thing Upon such Doubtfull Speeches to Nullifie a Will advisedly made shall not be permitted without clear and perspicuous Revocation or words that do amount to so much And thereupon upon this Opinion of the Civilians and Judges the Lord Keeper Decreed the Legacies to the Brothers the Codicil having made no Revocation of them CHAP. XXVI Certain Positions or Assertions of Law for the better understanding of this Subject of Legacies and Devises with certain mixt Cases touching the same 1. IF the words of the Legacy be Doubtful or Ambiguous the Motive inducing the Testator or the Cause of the Legacy is specially to be inspected 2. In Cases Doubtful whether the Legacy be given Absolutely or Conditionally it shall be presumed as Pure Simple and Absolute rather than Conditional 3. In a Legacy Doubtful as to its value for want of some discriminating description thereof by the Testator that which is of the least value belongs to the Legatary 4. Likewise in all Dubious Legacies as to the Quantity thereof the least is generally to be understood 5. A Doubtfull Legacy relating to Goods shall be understood of such only as the Testator had at the making of the Testament for the clearing whereof the Law casts the onus probandi on the Legatary 6. Where the Doubt arises from the Testators words the Ambiguity shall be interpreted in favour of the Legatary 7. In the Interpretation of Legacies the common usage of Speech is more to be considered than the exact propriety of the words 8. Also the Testators sense and meaning is more to be considered than his words 9. The Testators words are to be understood rather as he thought then as he spake or writ that is the effect of the Testament is guided governed and over-ruled more by the Testators Opinion than as things are in themselves 10. When the Testators words of Bequeathing seem to interfere one with another the latter words shall for the most part prevail Yet not always so there are some Cases wherein Contrarium verum est 11. When the Testators mind and meaning is not as intelligible as it should be hold his words before the Glass of the Law to make it as visible as it may be the Law is the best and indeed the only interpreter in all such Cases 12. An imperfect Speech in Bequeathing a Legacy may