for the punishment of fine and imprisonment c. but that it specially shall be limitted to such onely as did offend only in not well executing and using the said faculty of Physike for a generall clâ—â—â—â— is not to bee extended to those things are specially comprehended so 34. Eliz. f. 120. ubi A. seised of the mannor of Stable in O. in the county of S in fee and also of other lands in the said O. in fee suffereth a common recovery of all and declareth the uses by Indenture that the recoveror shall stand seised of all the lands and tenements in O. to the use of him and his wife and the heires of his body and dieth and after his death the wife entreth into the said Mannor by form of the said generall wordes but it was adjudged that those generall wordâ— did not extend to the Mannor which was specially named Coke l. 4. f. 8â— b. Nokes case clausula generalis non refertur ad expressa a generall clause is not referred to those things are expressed as where the Assignee of a Lease shall have a Writ of Covenant upon those wordes demise and grant yet if there be an expresse covenant that the Lessee shall enjoy it without eviction of the Lessor or any claiming under him this expresse Covenant qualifieth the generallity of the covenant in Law and restraineth it by mutuall consent of both parties that it shall not extend to the assignee Clausula generalis non porrigitur ad ea quae antea sunt specialiter comprehensa Coke l. 4 131. l. 4. when the deed at the first containeth speciall wordes and then concludeth in words generall both the wordes as well generall as speciall shall stand as Lands given to one and the heires of his body Habendum to him and his heires hee hath an estate taile and a fee simple expectant for as Dier f. 56. b A deed by wordes subsequent may bee qualified and abridged but not destroyed Dolosus versatur in universalibus generalibus Coke l. 3. f. 8. a. Twins case it is one of the Ensignes of fraude in a Deed of gift if the gift is generall without the exceptions of his apparell or any thing of necessity for it is commonly said that the fraudulent is conversant in generalls Coke l. 3. f. 57. b. Specots case A Bishop ought not to shew a generall cause for the refusall of a Clark as that he is criminosus or non idoneus for they are too generall and the fraudulent is exercised in generalls and therefore so incertaine that no issue can be taken of them as 2. E. 3. f. 6. The heire ought to alledge some certaine cause of refusall whence issue may be taken Generalia sunt praeponenda singularibus it is a rule in the Register that in a Writ the generall shall bee put in demand or plaint before the speciall as the Mesuage before lands the Land before Meadow Meadow before Pasture and Pasture before Wood and Wood before Juncary F. a. b. f. 2. E. Ex verbo generali aliquid excipitur Coke com f. 47. a. An exception is part of the thing granted and in esse as exceptis salvo praeter and out of a generall a part may be excepted as out of a Mannor an acre but not a part out of a certainty as out of 20 Acres one Ployd f. 361. a. A Lease of all my Lands in D. except white acre is void for white acre and a gift of all my horses except my black horse is void for my black horse Coke l. 10. f. 101. b. quando verba statuti sunt specialia ratio autem generalis generaliter flatutum est intelligendum where the words of a statute are speciall and the reason generall the statute is generally to be understood as the reason of the statute of 23 H. 6. whereby it was ordeined that no Sheriff should take any obligation by colour of their office but onely to themselves and upon condition that the Prisoners appeare at the day contained in the writ was for the avoyding of extortion and oppression and therefore is to receive a benigne and favourable construction and that in equity not only a bond but an assumpsit is within the reason of that statute and so was it adjudged 27. Eliz. Trin. in the Kings Bench betweene Danhigh and Hothcot that if a Sheriff or Goaler for ease or enlargement of any who is in his custody doth take a promise of him to save him harmelesse that though the statute doth onely speake of an obligation yet it is in equall mischiefe otherwise as Wray chiefe Justice said the statute should serve for little or nothing Multa transeunt cum universitate quae per se non transeunt Coke com f. 142. a. If a man seised of land as heire of the part of his mother make a gift in taile or a Lease for life reserving a rent the heire of the part of the Mother shall have the reversion and the rent also as incident thereunto for many things passe with the generallity which by themselves doe not pass so if a man hath a rent-seck of the part of his mother and the Tenant of the Land grant a distresse to him and his heires and the Grantee dieth the distresse shall goe with the rent to the heire of part of the Mother as incident and appertenant to the rent for now is the rent-seck become a rent charge Singulare distributive sumptum e aquat plurali Dier 328. b. a singular distributively taken equalleth a plurall as in an assise the Plaint is of two Acres of Land the Tenant pleads two barrs severall for the two Acres at large and the Plaintiffe makes two severall titles at large to wit for every acre one the Tenant pleades let the assise come upon the title in the singular number and the assise found one title for the Plaintiff and the other for the Defendant against the Plaintiff and judgement was given that the Plaintiffe should recover for one Acre and be barred for the other Coke l. 10. Br. Lifiels case A Lease is for one yeare and that if they agree the Lessee shall have the Land for three yeares rendring during the said terme ten pounds yearely this reservation goeth to both termes Propria res est quae solius est sive uni soli convenit Tholoss Syntag. lib. 5. c. 1. A propriety is that which is one mans onely and appertaineth onely to one man Ploid f. 308. b God made man the Soveraigne over all living creatures and gave the rule of them all to man Terram dâ—dit filiis hominum and so men by the endowment of God were made Lords of the earth and possessors of all things in the earth but how much land or things upon the earth one man shall have and how much another God hath leased to man by lawes by them to bee made and provided and by such lawes in every Realme and Country they are provided and divided and every man
holdeth his Lands and things by the Lawes of the Land wherein hee liveth and this commonly called the law of proeprty Nihil dat quod non habet Arist nemo potest plus juris in alium transferre quam ipse habet Coke com f. 309. b it is a common erudition in the Law that no man can grant that hee hath not Perkins f 15. for that is requisite that he who by his contract shall make another possessor of any thing should bee the proâ—rietor of the thing it selfe otherwise his contract is void Ployd f. 432 b. as if I possessed of an horse sell the Horse upon condition to another that he pay to mee at the feast of Christmas forty shillings for it and before the said feast I sell the horse to another and after the feast the first Vendee failes of payment by which I reseise the horse the second Vendee shall not have the horse for at the time of the second contract I had neither interest nor property nor possession of the horse but onely a condition which is not sufficient to make me able to contract for the property and possession therefore it is meerely void Ployden So if a man grant a rent charge out of the Mannor of Dale and in truth he hath nothing in the Mannor of Dale and after purchaseth the Mannor of Dale yet hee shall hold it discharged Perkins H. 15. So if one not seised of Lands maketh a Lease to another it is a good Plea for the Lessee to say that the Lessor had nothing in the Tenements at the time of the Lease Litt. and the reason of this is for that in every contract there must be quid pro quo for contractus est quasi actus contra actum and therefore if the Lessor had nothing in the land the Lessee hath not quid pro quo nor any thing for which he should pay his Rent and in that case he may plead that the Lessor non dimisit Coke Com. ibidem f. 41. b. vide ibidem plura If the Conusee of a Fine before any Attornement bargaineth and selleth the Signiory to another the Bargainee shall not distraine because the Grantor could not distrain for no man can transfer more right to another then he himselfe hath Coke Com. 309. b. Coke l. 6. f. 57. b. He that hath no seisin in the Land charged cannot give seisin of Rent vide plura Bredimans for no man can give that he hath not The King pardoneth one for making a bridge this is onely good for the fine and he must make up the Bridge because the Kings Subjects have interest in it 37. H. 8.4 Da tua dum tua sunt post mortem tunc tua non sunt Ployd 280. a. when one hath property in goods the property cannot be in him no longer then he liveth for after his death the goods belong unto another Nemo videtur rem amittere cujus propria non fuit Reg. I. C. no man can loose that of which he hath no property and therefore in a Replevin if the Defendant claim property the Sheriff cannot proceed for it is a rule in Law the property ought to be tryed by writ and therefore in this case where the tryall is by plaint the Plaintiff may have a writ de proprietate probanda directed to the Sheriff to trye the property and if thereupon it be found for the Plaintiff the Sheriff shall make deliverance Coke Com. f. 145. b. F. n. b. f. 77. If A. endict B. for stealing of Horses or other goods he must say de bonis catallis cujusdam A. For if there were no property there could be no stealing or injury for nemini vim facere videtur qui suo non alieno utitur Reg. I. c. Nemo reditum invito domino percipere possidere potest Coke Com. 303. b. no man can receive or possesse another mans Rents against the will of the Lord as if one hold of me by Rent which is service ingrosse and another which hath no right claimeth the rent and receiveth it of my Tenant by coertion of distresse or otherwise yet by the payment of my Rent to a stranger I cannot be disseised or ousted without my will or election but that I may distrain my Tenant for the Rent or have an assize against the â—ernor Lit. for a man cannot be disseised of a a Rent-service in grosse Rent-charge or Rent-seck by Attornment or payment of Rent to a stranger but at his election for the rule of the Law is no man can receive or possesse an other mans rent against his will Coke ibidem Quod meum est id amplius meum esse non potest Coke Com. f. 49. b. And therfore if lessee for years enter he is in actuall possession and then Livery cannot e made to him that is in actual possession whereby the Franke-Tenement or fee may inure to him in the remainder for that which is once mine cannot be more mine ibidem Thirdly From the Anteprecedents Aequivocum and Univocum AEQuivocum denoteth words of ambiguous and many significations which as Boetius signifies nothing nisi ad quasque res secundum voluntatem significantis applicetur unlesse they be applyed to the thing according to the will of him that declareth or expoundeth them of which the Law taketh notice and giveth these grounds and maximes Nobiliores benigniores presumptiones in dubijs sunt praeferendae Reg. P. C. And Coke l. 4. f. 13. b. Benignior sententia in rebus generalibus dubijs est praeferenda In doubtfull speeches and sentences the more favorable presumption and opinion is to be perferred As if one doth charge another that he hath forsworne himselfe by the Law it is not actionable for it may be he hath forsworne himself in usuall conversation but an action is onely maintainable against him that hath forsworn himself in Court of Record so ibidem f. 21. An Action upon the case was brought for these wordes for my Lands in Dallinson they seek my life adjudged not actionable because he may seek his life upon just cause which are the more favorable constructions So verba accipienda sunt in meliori sensu Hub. f. 106. Coke l. 4. f. 13. Wordes are to be taken at the best for the speaker though some of them cannot stand with that construction As thou art a Theefe and hast stolen a Tree it shall be adjudged of a Tree standing not felled which is not actionable But as it is said there in Hubberd 106. This rule holdeth not in Deeds and Pleas for in those words are taken more strongly against the speaker of which this reason may be given because commonly words in common language proceed of a sudden from choler and heat whereas words in Deeds and Pleas are grounded upon mature deliberation and consideration and therfore in Deeds this is a general ground Ambiguum pactum contra venditorem interpretandum est Reg. I. C. and Ambigua verba contra
b. a. If Tenant for years of Land granteth a rent-charge to another for the life of the grantee the grantee shall not have an estate of Frank-tenement in the rent in that he cannot have an estate of Frank-tenement derived out of the Chattell reall but he shall have the rent during all the years though the Lessee had forty years in the Land for terme of life is greater then years and therefore the Grantee shall have all the rent for all the years if he shall live so long And f. 525. b. An Executor cannot devise a terme to another which he hath as Executor for so soone as the Executor is dead the terme is to the use of the first Testator and his Executors have it as Executors to the first Testator and to his use and not as Executors of the last Testator nor to his use for the Executors have them by relation as immediate Executors to the first Testator A. Covenanteth with B. and his Executors to make a lease of white acre before Michaelwas and the Covenantee dyeth before and A. maketh a lease to his Executor the lease shall be to the use of the Testator and assets in the Executor for the Covenant which was the cause of the Lease came to the Executor in right of the Testator and to the same use shall the lease be Ployd f. 292. a. Chap-mans case Cessante causa cessat effectus Ployd 268. Sir John Radcliffs case the cause ceasing the effect also ceaseth An office was found that after the decease of Robert Earle of Sussex and Mary the Countesse his mother certaine Lands did descend to Sir John Radcliff Knight as Son and Heire male of the body of the said Robert engendred and the body of the said Mary and Sir John Radcliff Knight was then of the age of eighteen years before the finding of the office and the Lands were holden of the King and Queene by the tenth part of a fee of Knights service in Capite And when Sir John Radcliff became of full age he prayed his livery but the Court of wards required of him for the Queene the valew of his marriage but it was alleaged that because he was made Knight before the title of the Wardship accrewed and the Wardship was due to the Lord in respect of his imbecility to doe the service of a Knight and that the making him a Knight did admit him able to doe the service of a Knight his body ought not to be in ward for defect of such ability for the cause ceasing the effect also ceaseth and that if his person was not in Wardship no marriage nor value for it shall be due to the guardian and so was it adjudged by the Court contrary to Magna Charta c. 4. which was said to be made for the advantage of the Lords vide ibidem plura Coke Com. 312. a. Cessante causa vel ratione legis cessat lex The cause and reason of the Law ceasing the Law also ceaseth as at the common Law no aid was grantable of a stranger to an avowry because the avowry was made of a certaine person and now the avowry being made by the Statute of 21. H. 8. upon no person therefore the reason of the Law being changed the Law it self is also changed and consequently in an avowry according to that act aid shall be granted to any man vide ibidem plura Coke Com. f. 76. a. Cessante causa cessat causatum As if the Lord after he hath the Wardship of the body and the Lord doth release to the infant his right in the signiory or the signiory descendeth to the infant he shal be out of ward both for the body and the Land for he was in ward in respect he was not able to doe those services which he ought to doe to his Lord which now are extinct for the cause ceasing the thing caused ceaseth and there must be a tenure continuing or no Wardship So if the Conusee in a Statute merchant be in execution and his Land also and the Conusee release to him all debts this shall discharge the executiâ—n for the debt was the cause of the execution and of the continuance of it untill the debt be satisfied therefore the discharge of the debt which was the cause discharged the execution which was the effect Coke Com. f. 76. a. So if the heire female within the age of fourteen years be in ward and after the age of fourteen years expired the Lord by the Statute of W. 1. c. 22. hath two years more to tender her a convenable marriage but if the Lord marry her within the two years her husband and shee shall prefently enter into the Lands for the cause ceasing the effect also ceaseth Coke ibidem 7 5. b. The King granteth an office to one at will and ten pound fee during life pro officio illo now if the King put him from his office the fee shall cease 5. E. 4. 8. b. The executor or husband after the death of the wife guardian in socage shal not retain the Wardship for the guardian hath it not to his owne use but to the benefit of the heire and the executor or husband hath not that affection which the testator or wife had which was the cause that the Law giveth them the Wardship 7. Eliz. 293. b. If a stroke be given the first day of May and the King pardon him the second day of May for all felonies and misdemeanors the party smitten dyeth the third day of May so as this is no felony till after the pardon yet the felony is pardoned for the misdemeanor is pardoned and therefore all things pursuing are also pardoned 13. E. 401. If two coparceners make a lease reserving a rent they shall have this rent in common as they have the reversion but if afterwards they grant the reversion excepting the rent then they shall be Joyntenants of the rent Finch mono. f. 9. It is no principall challenge to a Juror that he hath married the parties mother if shee be dead without issue for the cause of favor is removed 14. H. 7. 2. The King disparking the Parke the office of the keeper is determined and all such offices as are presumed in Law to be for the commoditie of the King as well as the Patentee and if one granteth a Stewardship of a mannor and dismembreth that mannor the office is determined if a corporation granteth the office of a towne-clark and surrendreth their patent to be renewed all their offices are determined Huttons Reports Upon a divorce the woman shal have the goods given in marriage not being spent for the goods were given in advancement of the woman and therefore it is reasonable that shee should have them in that the cause and consideration of that gift is now defeated for the cause ceasing the effect also ceaseth Dyer f. 13. p. 61. Coke l. 5. f. 59. b. Vaughans case The originall cause of the amercement being pardoned the
in possession by the antient Law the entry of the disseisor for his negligence had beeâ— taken away which now is onely by descent many aâ—â— continuall are the mutations of the Law according to the changes of the time For the rule and ground holdeth quod perpetua lex est nullam begem humanam ac positivam esse perpetuam that it is a perpetuall Law that no humane or positive Law is perpetuall Bac. Max. f. 70. Tempus edax rerum Coke l. 3. f. 21. A. maketh a lease for years to B. and when the Terme is ended the remainder to C. the reversion is good for it is certaine enough that every terme shall end for time is the consumer and divourer of things Distingue tempora concordabis leges the times being distinguished the Law will be reconciled Coke l. 9. f. 16. b. The King by the Statute de bigammis 4. E. 1. when the heire was of full age had nothing but primam seisinam capiendo exitum the profits of the Land in effect for one yeare but could not endow the Feme because after the Heire was of age he was not guardian and for that reason he could not endow the Feme at the common Law no more then guardian in chivalry might who though after the Heir was of full age did hold the Land further for the value of the marriage no Writ of dower did lye against him because he was not guardian yet afterwards by the Statute de praerogativa regis 17. E. 2. the King had power to endow the Feme although the Heire were of full age si vidua illae voluerint so as the Statute leaveth it to the election of the Feme whether shee will be endowed in the Chancery or at the common Law so as by distinguishing the times the difference of those Laws are apparently agreed and reconciled Omnia tempus habent habenâ— sua tempora tempus Coke l. 10. f. 82. a. All things are subject to time and time it self hath also its times as by the Statute of 34 H. 8. three severall Times ought to concurr in a devise whereby the King may have the value of the third part the first is tempus habendi every person having the 2d is tempus tenendi holding of the King the third is tempus disponendi may â—ive and dispose as if a man be seised of one acroâ—â—f Land in fee in chiefe by Knights service and of two other acres in fee holden in socage and the Tenant infeoffe his youngest Son of the acre holden in chief and of one of the other acres to have to him and his heirs and afterwards purchaseth Lands holden in socage he may devise all his Lands newly purchased holden in sooage because he had no Lands holden of Knights service in Capite at the time of the devise for the acts have made a conjunction of the Lands which the Tenant holdeth in socage with the Land which he holdeth of the King by Knights service in Capite so as when the Tenant hath conveyed the Land holden in Capite to his youngest Son now when he made his Will of the Lands so newly purchased he had no Lands holden of the King in Capite at the time of the devise and the Statute restraineth only those Lands in socage which he had at the time of having of the Lands holden in Capite vide ibidem plura in Loveys case For Judicis officium est ut res ita tempora rerum Quaerere quaesitâ— tempore tutus eris A Judges part it is to ponder things with time And by the square of time sure Judgment so to finde Coke Com. f. 202. a. If a rent be granted payable at a certaine day and if it be behinde and demanded that the Grantee shall distraine for it in this case the Grantee needeth not to demand it at the day but if he demand it at any time after the day he shall distraine for it for the Grantee hath election in this case to demand it when he will to inable him to distraine But upon a Lease for years reserving a rent upon condition that if the rent be not paid at Michaelmas or within one and twenty dayes after that then he may re-enter the tenant is not bound to pay the rent or tender the mony before the last instant of the last day but if he do not then the Lessor may re-enter and have the Land and the rent also but if the Lessor be not at the time there to receive the rent he cannot re-enter though he demand the rent before Brook Intender 41. unlesse before the Lessee meets the Lessor upon the Land and tender the Rent on the same day Coke Com. f. 22. a. Ployd f. 392. 393. a. Where a thing is referred to a time which declareth certainly if it be mistaken all shall be void as Trin. 7. E. 3. 26. One bringeth a Writ and reciteth that it is contained in the Articles made in the time of Edward the second and declared further according to the statute and the writ was abated by award for that those Articles articuli super chartas C. 9. were made in the time of Edward the first So Tr. 18. E. 3. f. 25. A statute Merchant was made to be paid in the sixteenth yeare of E. 3. and the party sued execution and the Writ supposed the sum to be paid in the fourteenth yeare of E. 3. and by the suit the Feoffee was outed whereupon he sued a Writ of error in the Kings Bench and the writ was abated and it was said that the time declared certainty for it might be that there were two statutes payable at diverse severall daies and therefore the day of payment was materiall ibidem So if a defeasance be made of a statute which reciteth it to be made the tenth day of May where it beareth date the first day of May the defeasance is void for the misprision of the time for the law saith that it may be that there was two statutes the one bearing date the first day and the other the tenth day vide ibidem plura in the Earle of Leicesters case A loco from the place LOcus pro solutione reditus aut pecuniae secundum conditionem dimissionis aut obligationis est stricte observandus Coke l. 4. f. 73. a. in Burchers case The place for the payment of money or rent according to the condition of a Lease or obligation is strictly to be observed As if a common person maketh a Lease of Lands in R. reserving a rent to be generally paid at such a feast upon condition of re-entry if it be not then paid the demand must be upon the land for the land is the debtor and therfore that is the place of demand appointed by the law and if there be an house upon the land he must demand the rent at the house and not at the back doore but at the fore doore because the demand must be made at the most notorious
may have a Quare impedit against another if shee be disturbed of her presentment by turne so cannont Joyn-tenants or tenants in common F. N. B. 34 I. For equality of partition among Coparceners a rent granted shall be a Fee-simple without the word heires Coke com f. 10. a. Coke com 102. a. Homage ancestrell is a speciall Warranty in Law and the Lands generally which the Lord hath at the time of the Voucher shall be lyable to execution in value whether he hath them by descent or purchase but in the case of an expresse warranty the heire shall be charged onely with such Lands as he hath by descent from the same Ancestor so in this case Firmior potentior est operatio legis quam dispositio hominis Lease upon condition that if it happen that the Lessee make any wast in or upon the Premisses it shall be lawfull for the Lessor to re-enter and the Lessee suffereth the house to fall in default of covering and reparations Dyer and Wash said that the Lessor might re-enter for such wast is punishable by the statute of Gloucester for destructionem facere in domibus Dyer 281. b. and so it is if he suffer wast to be done by a stranger Doct. Stud. l. 2. c. 4. yet if the Tenant had been bound in an Obligation that he shall do no wast he shall not forfeit his Bond by the wast of a stranger for greater is the operation of the Law c. A man is seised of three Mannors of equall value and taketh a wife and she taketh one entire Mannor for her Dower which is charged with a rent she shall hold it charged otherwise it is if she had recovered her Dower by a Writ of Dower and had had a third part of each assigned to her Inutilis labor sine fructu non est effectus legis Non licet quod dispendio licet Sapiens incipit a fine Et lex non praecipit in utilia Coke com f. 127. b. The Law commandeth no vain chargeable and unprofitable things As a Villain by the Law shall not have an appeal of Mayhem against his Lord for in an appeal the Mayhem man shall onely recover damages and if the Villain in this case recovereth damages against his Lord and thereupon hath execution the Lord may take it that the Villain hath in execution from the Villain and so the recovery void inutilis labor stultus and unprofitable labour is foolish and idle which the Law prescribeth not Coke com f. 197. a. Tenants in Common of an Hawk and an Horse shall joyn in Assise for otherwise they would be without remedy for one of them cannot make his plaint in an Assise of the Moyety of an Hawk or Horse because the Law will never inforce a man to demand that which he cannot recover as the Moyety of an Hawk or an Horse or any other entire thing for Lex neminem cogit ad vana in utilia Coke com f. 319. b. If a Lease be made for term of life the remainder to another in tail the remainder over to the right Heirs of the Tenant for life and Tenant for life granteth his remainder in fee to another by his Deed the remainder shall presently pass without any Attornment for none can atturn but himself and it were in vain that he should atturn upon his own Grant for quod vanum est lex non requirit Coke l. 5. 84. a. Where a man is in custody of the Sheriff by process of Law and after another Writ is delivered to him to take the body of him who is in custody presently he is in his custody by force of the second Writ by judgment of Law although he make not an actuall arrest of him for to what purpose shall he be arrested of him who is and was before in his custody for the Law prescribeth no fruitless things Actus legis nemini facit injuriam Coke com 178. a The Act of Law doth injury to none As if the land out of which a rent-charge is granted be recovered by an elder Title and thereby the rent-charge is voided yet the Grantee shall have a Writ of Annuity because the rent-charge is avoided by course of Law So if Tenant for another mans life grant a rent-charge by Deed to one for one and twenty years Cestuy que use dieth the rent-charge is determined yet may the Grantee have during the years a Writ of Annuity for the arrearages incurred after the death of Cestuy que use because the rent-charge did determine by the act of God and course in Law which wrong no man ibid. Coke l. 5. f. 87. a. If the Defendant in debt dieth in execution the Plaintiff shall have a new execution by Elegit or Fieir facias because otherwise the Plaintiff should lose his debt without any default in him and the act of God and the act in Law will not prejudice any one Trewgrijard being a Burgess of the Parliament who was taken upon an Exigent post capias and yet upon his Writ of priviledge of Parliament the Sheriff let him go at large for the King and the Realm hath an interest in the body of every Subject and the Common-wealth shall be preferred yet the party of the Parliament may be taken in execution again after the Plaintiff shall not be prejudiced in his execution by the act of Law which doth no man wrong neither is the Sheriff chargeable because his Office consists chiefly in the execution and service of writs and is sworn to do it Dyer 60. Lex plus respicit acta sine verbis quam verba sine actis Coke l. 3. f. 26. The Law respecteth more acts without words then words without acts As at the Common Law if lands be given to Baron and Feme in taile or in fee and the Baron dieth there the Feme cannot devest the Frank-Tenement out of her by any verball waiver or disagreement in pais as if before any entry made by her she saith that she waiveth and altogether disagreeth to the said state and that she never will take or accept of it yet the Frank-tenement remaineth in her and she may enter when she pleaseth and waive it in Court of Record for the Law more respecteth Acts without words then words without Acts and therefore if she entreth and taketh the profits although she say nothing it is a good agreement in Law And so it is adjudged in Mich. 34 E. 1. Avowry 232. That if a man take a distress for one thing yet when he cometh in Court of Record he may make an Avowry for what thing he pleaseth a multo fortiori when a Frank-tenement is vested in him it cannot be devested by nude words in pais and with it accordeth 17 E 3. 6. 17. Where the Baron alieneth his lands and retaketh the estate to him and his wife in taile the Baron dieth the Lord of whom the land was holden by Knights-service supposing that the Baron died sole
re-entry is good if the other party confesse the condition If twelve be sworn and one depart another of the pannell by consent may be sworn and with the eleven give verdict The Court in a Quare impedit by consent may give longer day then is limited by the Statute of Marlebridge The Statute of 2. E. 3. 20. E. 3. provide that neither for the great Seale or the petty Seale Justice shall be delayed yet when the matter concerneth the King onely if he command it it may be stayed F. N. B. 21. b. Tenure at this day may be created by consent of all notwithstanding the Statute of Quia emptores terrarum 27. H. 8. By speciall consent of parties re-entry may be made for default of payment of the rent without demande of it Dyer 78. vide by all which cases it appeareth that consent of parties altereth the forme and course of Law ibidem Coke l. 5. f. 40. Electio semel facta placitum testatum non patitur regressum 20. H. 6. 24. Coke com f. 146. a. An election once made and testified by pleading suffereth no returne As if a Rent-charge be granted to A. and B. and their heires and A distraineth the Beasts of the Grantor and he sueth a Replevin A. avoweth for himselfe and maketh conusance for B A. dyeth B. surviveth B. shall not have a Writ of Annuity for in that case the election and the avowry for the rent of A. barreth B. of any election to make it an Annuity ibidem Coke l. 4 f. 5. b. in Vernoms case If the Baron discontinue the Land of his wife and dyeth and the wife bringeth a Writ of dower against the discontinuee and recover the third part shee is by it estopped to bring a cui invita for by the Writ of Dower shee claimeth Title of Dowâ—r onely and therefore shall be estopped to claime any other right by a cui invita 10. E. 3. double Plea 8. 10. E. 3. Scire facias 13. F. N. B. 194 17 Ass Pl. 3. For when shee bringeth her Writ of Dower and hath judgement to have the third part of all by it shee affirmeth that shee hath but title of Dower and by consequence no estate and therefore shee shall be estopped to claime any part of it of which shee hath demanded by her Writ to be endowed and an acceptance of rent by her Deed indented concludeth the feme of her right 11. H 7. 10 vide ibidem plura in Christians case But here a diversity is to be observed that a man may have several remedies for a thing that is meerly personal or meerly reall As if a man may have an action of account or an action of debt at his pleasure he bringeth an action of account appeareth to it and after is non-suite yet he may have an action of debt afterwards because both actions charge the person the like case is of an assize of a writ of entry in the nature of assize and the like Coke com f. 146 a. Multa conceduntur per obliquum quae non concâ—duntur de directo Coke l. 6. f. 47. a. Many things are granted by the by which are not directly granted As when a Bar is pleaded in a reall or personall Action as a release c. in a forrain County there the Jurors which try it shall assesse damages according to the profits of the Land in another County so by that meanes enquire of things locall in another County for many things are granted by the by c. And when they try the matter of the Bar upon good and pregnant evidence they ought to finde all dependants upon it as damages c. vide ibidem plura Dispositio â—e interesse facturo lest inutilis Bacon f. 56. The grant of a future interest is vaine and void for the Law doth not allow of grants unlesse there be a foundation of an interest for the Law will not accept of Grants of Titles or of things in Action which are imperfect interests much lesse will it allow a man to grant or incumber that which is no interest at all but meerly future As a Writ of Annuity was granted by a prebend after collations admissions and institutions but before installation or induction which though it was confirmed by the ordinary who was the Patron also was adjudged void because he had but jus ad rem and a future interest but not in re for he shall not be said a prebendary to all intents nor at the Common Law without the reall possession which is by induction Dyer 221. Pl. 18. A. maketh a Lease of Land for years to B without reservation of the Woods and Trees the Lessor cannot sell all the Woods and Trees for the Woods and Trees are parcell of the Lease and passe to the Lessee as well as the Land if they be not excepted upon the Lease for all the fruites and profits coming from the fruitfull Trees belong to the Lessee and the shadow and also the branches and loppings for fire or enclosure of fences Dyer 90. Pl. 8. If I grant unto you that if you enter into an obligation to me of one hundred pounds and after procure me such a Lease that then the same obligation shall be void and you enter into such an obligation unto me and afterwards doe procure such a lease yet the obligation is simple because the defeasance was made of that which was not 20 Eliz. 19. H. 6.62 So if I grant unto you a rent-charge out of white-acre and that it shall be lawfull for you to distraine in all my other Lands whereof I am now seised and which I shall hereafter purchase although this be but a liberty of distresse and no rent save onely out of white-acre yet as to the Lands after to be purchased the clause is void 27 E. 3. If I covenant with my Son in consideration of naturall Love to stand seised to his use of the Lands I shall hereafter purchase the use is void 25. 27. Eliz. So if I devise the Mannor of D. by speciall name of which at that time I am not seised and after I purchase it except I make some new publication of my will my devise is void Ployd Rigdens case vide Bacon ibidem plura f. 57.58 Non refert an quis assensum praebat verbis an rebus factis Coke l. 10 f. 52. b. It mattereth not whether a man giveth his assent by words or by things themselves and Deeds Whereas the assent of an Executor is necessary before any legancy can be had for that debts are first to be paid and that the Executor must look to it at-his perill Offi. of Exec. 234. the assent consent and agreement of John Morris the Executor to the Legacy of William Taylor and Elizabeth his wife did appeare in that at the speciall instance and request of the said Morris the said William Taylor and Elizabeth his wife did release the said Legacy to the said Morris
without an originall is voide Kel f. 19. b. A remainder is limited to the King and before the inrolement of the deed the King granteth it over and then the deed is inrolled this will not make the grant good Coke l. 3. f. 29. An executor assigneth auditors to one who was accountant to the testator and his auditors find him in arrearages the Action of debt shall be brought in the Detinet onely and hath respect to the beginning 11. H. 6. If I have a villaine for yeares as executor and the villaine purchaseth land the executor entreth the land shall be to the use of the testator and assets in his hands because the villaine which was the cause of it was to such use Ployd f. 292. a. Chap-mans case Causa origo est materia negotii Cok l. 1. Shellies case f. 99. b. vide As if a servant hath an intent to kill his Master before the execution of his intent departeth out of his service being out of his service executeth his intent and killeth him which was his Master it is petit treason for the execution respects the originall cause which was the malice conceived when he was his servant vide ibidem plura I. S. buildeth a shop on the wast of a Mannor of which the Queene was seis'd the Queen granteth the Mannor to the Earle of Leicester and he never entreth nor taketh rent I. S. dieth and his sonne entreth there is no descent against the patentee because there was no disseisin against the Queene Dyer 266. b. Yet when the law giveth power and authority to doe any thing Exception the law adjudgeth of the thing by the act subsequent not precedent Coke l. 8. f. 146. b. As the law giveth me power or license to enter into a common Hostlery or Taverne or to the Lord to distraine or to the owner of the soile to distrain for damage feasant or to him in the reversion to view if wast be made and to the commoner to enter into the land to see his beasts but if he that entreth into the Hostlery or Tavern maketh trespass or if the Lord that distraineth for rent or damage fesant beat or slay the distress or if he that entreth to see wast breaketh the house or remaineth there an whole night or the commoner cut downe trees in these cases the Law shall judge by act subsequent that they entred to that purpose and shall be trespassors from the beginning for acta exteriora indicant intoriora secreta the outward acts shew the inward secrets and with what minde and with what intent he did enter So if a purveyor take my beasts for the hostle of the King by force of his commission it is legall but if he sell them in Market then the first taking is injurious Coke l. 9. f. 11. a. Tenant in taile hath issue two daughters and dieth and the elder entreth into the whole and after entry maketh a feoffment with warranty which is a lineall warranty for the one and collaterall for the other the law judgeth by the act subsequent that the entry was not generall for them both but that it was onely for her selfe and that it shall be a warranty to commence by disseisin for the one moiety Quod initio vitiosum est tractu temporis non convalescet Reg. I. Civ Quod initio non valet tractu temporis non convalescet Coke com f. 35. a. That which in the beginning is vicious or invalid cannot by tract of time bee made good or valid as tenant for life of a carve of land the reversion to the father in fee the son and heire apparent endoweth his wife of this carve by the assent of the father tenant for life dieth the husband dieth this is no good endowment ex assensu patris because the father at the time of the assent had but a reversion expectant upon a free-hold whereof hee could not have endowed his own wife Ployd f. 432. b. A. possessed of an horse selleth the horse upon condition that hee shall pay him at Christmas forty shillings for it and before the said feast he selleth the horse to another and at the feast the first buyer faileth of payment whereupon A. reseiseth the horse yet the second buyer shall not have him because at the time of the second contract A. had no interest nor property nor possession of the horse but onely a condition which was not sufficient to make the contract good A. seised of Lands in see maketh a lease for twenty yeares rendring rent to begin presently and the same day he maketh a Lease to another for the same terme the second lease is utterly void so as if the first Lessee surrendreth his terme to the Lessor or loseth the same by breach of condition or forfeiteth it by making a feoffment upon entry of the Lessor the second Lessee shall not have his terme because the Lessor at the making of the second lease had nothing in him but the reversion ibidem A feoffement to the use of the husband for life the remainder to I. S. the remainder to the wife for her joynture this is not a joynture to bar dower because it did not take effect immediately after the death of her husband Hut Rep. f. 50. An infant or a married woman makes a will and publisheth the same and afterwards dieth being of full age or sole notwithstanding this both Wills are void 10. Eliz. 344. Noy Max. f. 4. A lease for life the remainder to the Major and commonalty of B. whereas there is no such it is void though the King doth create such a corporation during the particular estate so a remainder limited to John the son of I. S. having no such son and afterwards a son is borne to him whose name is John during the particular estate it is void Doder Que malo inchoata sunt principio vix bono peraguntur fine Those things which have a bad beginning can hardly have a good end Coke l. 11. f. 78. As a man seised of Lands in fee by deed upon good consideration granteth the Land after his death to the Queene her heires and successors such grant is not made good by the generall words of the act of 18. Eliz. because it was void in the beginning and with it accordeth 38. H. 6. f. 33. The Abbeffe of Sions case and the Earle of Leicesters case Ployd f. 4000. a stronger case then it vide ibidem plura Magdalen Colledges case Coke l. 4. f. 90. a. If a son and heir apparent of a Baron reteyne a Chaplaine and giveth to him his letters under signe and seale and after his father dieth and this Chaplaine purchaseth a dispensation this retainer and those letters will not serve him in that they were not availeable at the beginning vide ibid. Dâ—uries case Coke câ—m f. 352 b. If a fine be levied without any originall it is voidable but not void but if an originall be brought and a retraxii
entred and after that a concord is made or a fine levied this is void in respect the verity appeareth on record for where the verity is apparent in the record the adverse party shall not be estopped to take advantage of the truth for he cannot be estopped to alleage the truth an impropriation is made after the death of the Incumbent to a Bishop and his successors the Bishop by indenture demiseth the parsonage for forty yeares to begin after the death of the incumbent the Deane and Chapter confirmeth it the incumbent dieth this demise shall not conclude because it appeareth that he had nothing in the appropriation till after the death of the incumbent ibid. Coke l. 10 f. 62. a. If a Bishop maketh a Lease of Lands for four lives and one of them dieth in his life so as now there be but three and after he dieth yet it shall not bind the successor for those things which have a bad beginning can scarcely be brought to a good end Ployd f. 344. a. If a Feme covert giveth Lands devisable by the common law by will and publish it and after the Baron dieth after the wife dieth the devise is void because the foundation is founded on the first parts to wit the making and publiâ—hing which are void though at the time of her death she was discovert but the death without a good beginning giveth no effect so if an infant maketh a Will and publish it and after is at full age it is not of effect causa qua supra ibidem Ployd f. 344. a. If one disseise one of two acres in Dale and the disseisee releaseth to the disseisor all his right he haâ—h in all the lands in Dale and delivereth the release as an escrowl to be delivered to the disseisor as his deed the last day of May before that time the disseisor diseiseth him of another acre in D. and after the deed is delivered to the disseisor the last day of May the right which hee hath in the third acre shall not pass for the beginning and the intent is to be respected in all acts So if one have a reversion in fee of two acres which I. S. holdeth for life and granteth to another the reversion of all the acres that I. S. holdeth for life and then the grantor purchaseth the reversion of another acre I. S. holdeth for life and after I. S. attorneth to the grantee for all the three acres the third acre shall not pass for the reason abovesaid If a man devise the manner of Dale or white acre Excepton and have nothing in it at the time of making the Will and after purchaseth it there it shall pass to the devisee for it shall be taken that his intent was to purchase it Ployd f. 344. a. If I let B. acre by deed indented in which I have nothing and I purchase it afterwardes it is a good Lease 8. f. 3. 24. F. n. b. f. 73. c. If a man be distrained in any liberty and he sue a replevin there by plaint or by Writ and after hanging the plaint in the Liberty he be distrained again for the same cause by the same person who distrained he shall not have a Writ of recaption because the plaint is not holden before the Sheriff c. nor before the Justices but if the plaint bee removed by pone and out of the Liberty before the Justices there the party shall have a Writ of recaption as well for the reprisall before the Writ as for the reprisall after whereas otherwise before the removal a recaption did not lie upon the reprisall of a distress in case a replevin was sued in a Mannor or Liberty and not in the County Coke l. 8. f. 78. a. Tenant in taile is the remainder in taile of the grant of the King if tenant in taile acknowledgeth a fine or suffereth a common recovery it shall not barre the issues because the reversion was in the King but if after the reversion be granted and put out of the crowne the fine shall bar the issues Coke com f. 14. a. Quod prius est dignius est qui pâ—ior est tempore potior est jure Eract l. 2. c. 10. and therefore among the males the eldest brother and his posterity descending from him shall inherit before any yonger brother because Littleton saith he is most worthy of blood and Bracton Siquis plures filios habuerit jus proprietatis primo descendit ad primogenitum eo quod inventus est primo in rerum natura whosoever hath many sons the right of propriety shall descend to the first borne in that hee first is found in the nature of things and in King Alfreds time Knights fees descended to the eldest son Glanvill l. 7. c. 3. vide ibidem plura Coke l. 4. Druties case f. 90. a. Though a Countess may have as many â—haplaines as she will by the Common Law yet by the statute can shee have but two capable of dispensation and reason requireth that he that hath served longest should be first preferred for he that is the former in time is the more worthy in Law Ployd f. 259. a. D. Hales case Baron and Feme are joyntenants of a Lease for two yeares there are no moieties between them but every of them hath the whole and if the husband charge the Land shee after her death shall avoid it 7. H. 6. f. 1. for she is remitted to the terme and is in upon a title parameunt the grant So if a man alien trees growing upon the ground entailed or in land which he hath in right of his wife and dieth before they are cut downe the alienee shall not fell them because the issue in taile is in upon a title paramount the alienâ—tion P. 18. E. 4. f. 5. 14. H. 4. f. 32. The Lord may take his Ward which is an apprentice out of the possession of his master because his title to his body accrueth in respect of his signiory which is more ancient than his apprentiship Ployd ibidem When one hath a presentment to a Church two turnes and another a third turne if he that hath the third turne bring a â—uare impedit he shall not begin with his owne turne first but with the other two turnes Vnumquodque principior um est sibimetipsi fides cum ea negantibus non est disputandum quia ad principia non est ratio Fortescue de laudibus legum Angl. f. 11. Dyer 271. a. There are principles of being so all causes are the principles of their effects and there are principles of knowledge so a proposition by which as the more knowen another is conceived is a principle and of this principle it is said That every principle is of credit to it selfe and that we ought not to dispute against denyers of principles As arrearages of Rent-charge being due to a woman sole and after shee taketh an husband and then another day of payment
a directory and doe not bind the estate or interest of the land yet if the fine or recovery or other assurance be pursued according to the Indentures there cannot be any bare averment against the Indentures to be taken in such case that after the making of the Indentures or before the assurance by mutuall agreement of parts was concluded and agreed that the assurance shall bee to other uses but if other agreement or limitation of uses bee made by writing or by other matter so high or more high then the last agreement shall stand for every contract and agreement must be dissolved by a matter of as high a nature as the other was vide ibidem plura in the Earle of Rutlands case Coke l. 6. f. 43. b. Blakes case A writ of Covenant and the breach was for not reparing of the house and the Defendant pleaded accord betweene him and the Plaintiff with satisfaction and though it be regularly true that arbitrement or accord with satisfaction is no plea where the action is founded upon a deed for every thing is to be discharged by a matter of as high a nature as it is obliged yet there is a diversity where the duty accrueth by the deed in certainty tempore confectionis as by covenant bill or obligation to pay a sum of mony there it is a certaine duty and ought to bee discharged by a matter of as high a nature but where there is no certaine duty accrueth by deed but onely a wrong or default subsequent together with the Deed which onely giveth an Action to recover damages as for default of reparations there an accord with satisfaction is a good Plea because the end of the action is onely to have damages in the personalty for the action is not meerely grounded on the deed but also from the deed and the wrong subsequent and generally in all Actions where damages are only to bee recovered arbitrement or accord with satisfaction is a good plea vide ibidem plura Vnum quod que dissolvitur eo modo quo constituitur Nay Max. f. 4. As an obligation or matter in writing cannot be discharged by an agreement by word but by writing and though in abatement as a receipt of part upon a deed it shall not bee admitted without a deed of it 19. E. 4. 1. b. In an annuity growing by prescription rien arreare is a good plea for a prescription is no matter in deed but in an annuity by deed it is no good plea without shewing an acquittance 3 H. 7. 33. An Act of Parliament cannot bee avoid but by Parliament The submission of an arbitrement by deed must be countermanded by deed Things may bee avoided and determined by the ceremonies and Acts like unto those by which they were created Bacon uses c. as Livery and Seisin by entry a grant by claime and charge by discharge and an use which is raised by declaration and limitation may cease by words of declaration and limitation Non impedit clausula derogatoria sine clausula de non obstanâ—e de futuro quo minus ab cadem potestateres dissolvantur a quibus constituuntur Bacon Max f. 67. Acts which are in their nature revocable cannot by strength of words be fixed or perpetuated the law judgeth it to bee idle and of no force to deprive men of that which is most incident to humane condition and that is alteration and repentance As if I make my will and in the end thereof adde this clause Also my will is if I shall revoke this present will or declare any new will unless it bee in writing subscribed with the hands of two witnesses c. that such revoration shall he void any such pretended will to the contrary notwithstanding yet may I by paroll without any writing repeale the same and make a new one So if a statute bee made that no sheriff shall continue in his office above a yeare and if any patent be made to the contrary though it bee with a clausula de non obstante it shall be void yet notwithstanding such a Patent of the Sheriffs Office made by the King with a non obstante will be good in law because it is an inseperable prerogative of the Crowne to dispence with politike statutes and of that kind notwithstanding any derogatory clause 28. E. 3. c. 7. 24. E. 3. c. 9. 2 H. 7. 6. If the Parliament should enact that there should be no Parliament but that the King should have the authority of Parliament and rule by the ancient lege regia it were good in Law quia potestas suprema seipsum dissolvere potest because the highest power may dissolve it selfe Bacon From the matter DEbile fundamentum fallit opus Noy Max. f. 5. when the foundation faileth all goeth to the ground As when an estate to which a warranty is annexed is defeated the warranty also is defeated as if Tenant in taile discontinue and the discontinuee is diseised or maketh a Feoffment upon condition in whose possession a collaterall ancestor of the issue in taile releaseth and dieth the issue is barred but if the discontinuee enter upon the disseisor or upon the Feoffor for the condition broken the issue is restored to his formedon Lit. Coke l. 6. f. 14. a. Burton was deprived for adultery and afterwards by a generall pardon adultery was pardoned and though the deprivation was in force and that he that after the deprivation was admitted instituted and inducted remained Parson yet by force of the said pardon is hee become Parson againe without any sentence declaring the deprivation to bee void for by the pardon the adultery which was the foundation of the deprivation was discharged and by consequence all that was depending on the said foundation is discharged for sublato fundamento corruit opus So if an execution bee sued upon a statute and then the connusee maketh a defeasance upon the statute upon the payment of twenty pound if the twenty pound be paid the execution shall be defeated as well as the statute 20. Assize Pl. 7. If there be a disseisor of Lands in ancient demesne and the Lord confirmeth to him to hold at the common Law the disseisee reentreth now the land shall be ancient demesne again for the estate wherupon the confirmation should enure is defeated 49 E. 3. 8. A Church appropriated to a spirituall corporation becommeth disappropriate if the corporation be dissolved 3. E. 3. 74. b. Licet tenenti vetus opus reficere non novum facere Febl 2. f. 51. A Tenant may repair an old work but not make a new one As by our law the Tenant may cut downe trees for the amendment of houses or reparation of them 44. E. 3. 21. and 44. 11. H. 4 32. But if the necessity of a new house commeth in question as to build a Stable or no house be built upon the Land at the time of the Lease the Lessee may not cut downe trees to make a
place and it is not materiall whether any person be there or not and if one place be as notorious as another the Lessor hath election to demand it at which he will and if the Lessor demand it at a place which is not notorious or at the back doore of the house and in pleading alledge a demand of the rent generally at the house the Lessee may traverse the demand and upon the evidence it shall be found for him for that it was a void demand Ibidem and Coke com 201. and 202. b. a. But if a rent be reserved upon the demise to be payable at a place out of the land he that shall take advantage for non-payment of the rent ought to demand the rent at the place where it is limitted to be paid and therefore the opinion in Kelwellies case Ployd f. 70. that he in the reversion may enter for the non payment of such rent without any demand made was utterly denied by the whole Court Ididem and Coke com 202. a. But if there be no place appointed where the rent is to be paid there the rent is to be tendred on the Land Coke 210. a. b. Because it issueth out of the Land but otherwise it is in such a case of a Feoffment or Mortgage for it is not sufficient for the feoffor to be upon the land there ready to pay the money to the feoffee at the day set but he must seek the feoffee if he be then in another place within the Realme of England and so it is if a man be bound in an obligation of twenty pound upon condition that he pay to the obligee at such a day 10. l. that then c. The obligor ought to seek the obligee if he be in England and at the day appointed tender the ten pound otherwise he shall forfeit the twenty pound Coke com ibidem and therefore as he adviseth it shall be good and a sure way upon such a feoffment or mortgage to appoint a speciall place where the money shall be paid and the more especiall it is the more better it is Coke com f. 211. b. And so is it also upon an obligation Ployd f. 71. a. and b. If the obligee be in his own house and the obligor come to him there and tender the mony he shall not be a trespassor for his comming there for in that by the taking of the obligation the obligee was assenting that the obligor should pay him the ten pound by necessity of reason he ought to be assenting to come to him to offer unto him the 10. l. for to come to his person precedeth the offer which he was assenting to therfore ex consequenti he shall not punish him for that thing to which himselfe was agreeing But if he had entred into the house of another man there he shall be a trespassor to the said man if the same man will take him so vide plura ibid. Kedwellies case Exception Though a common person in reversion cannot enter for non-payment of rent without demand yet if the King make such a Lease for yeares rendring rent with such a condition ut supra the King shall take advantage of the condition without any demand because the law which alwaies observeth decorum and conveniency appointeth the subject to attend upon his soveraigne and in such case to make the first act though it be in case of condition which trencheth upon the destruction of his estate But if the King granteth the reversion over his grantee shall not take advantage of the condition without demand for it is a personall prerogative annexed to the person of the King and not in respect of the nature and quality of the land Coke l. 4. f. 23. A So the King maketh a Lease for yeares rendring a rent payable at his receipt of Westminster and after the King granteth the reversion to another and his heires the grantee shall demand the rent on the Land and not at the Kings receipt at Westminster for though the law without expresse words doth appoint the Lessee in the Kings case to pay it at the Kings receipt yet in case of a subject the law appointeth the demand to be on the land Coke com f. 201. b. and Coke l. 4. f. 72. 73. Burroughs case vide ibidem plura Circumstantia loci est testis veritatis certitudinis Ployd 393. a. The place is materiall and is a circumstance and witnesse of truth and certainty As if a man will plead the Letters Patents of the King bearing date at Westminster and indeed they did beare date at another place it seemes in 38. H. 6. by Choke f. 34. by Littleton f. 36. and by Redsham Moile and Prisot f. 37. That for the variance of the place it failed and the Plea shall be adjudged against him So if the King give authority to one to arraigne one upon indictment taken against him at Dale in such a County when indeed the indictment was taken at another place in the same County he cannot arraigne him for the place declareth the certainty what indictment the King intended for it may be there were two indictments of the same matter and thing and the one of them taken in one Village the other in another and by it the expresment of the Village declared the certainty of it Dier 105. a. An outlawry was reversed because it was ad comitat Lancaster ibidem tent and did not say at Lancaster or such certain place to which ibidem might be referred Ployd f. 191. a. The place must be shewne by the Plaintiff where the things were done because the visne should come thence if the things be traversed as H. 6. E. 4. 11. Brooke lieu 55. The place ought to be shewn in the count in debt upon an obligation where the obligation was made and M. 39. H. 6. 32. Brook lieu 45. If an attornement be alledged the place ought to be pleaded where it was made and in such like things of effect that may be traversed the place ought to be shewne where the thing was done for the certainty of the triall and f. 149. b. the place ought to be shewne where the attornement was made if the attornement bee pleaded 15. H. 7. 24. Coke l. 6. f. 47. Dowdales case when the place is materiall as when it is parcell of the issue there the Jurors cannot find the point in issue in any other place for by especiall pleading the point in issue is restrained to a certaine place but when the place is named onely for conformity and necessity and when it is parcell of the issue as in the case of 10. Eliz. 271. in debt against the heire he pleaded rieâ— by descent generally in that case the Plaintiff cannot reply in such generall manner for then no triall can be had of it but in case for conformity and necessity of a triall he ought to name a certaine place as there he did in the Parish and
f. 13. a. If two four or more men being severally seised of land joyne in a recognizance all their lands must be equally extended because they are in an equall condition and case 26 Assi Pl. 37. Now custome hath created inheretances in copy-holds and that the lands shall be descendable the law doth direct the descent according to the Maxims and rules of the common law as incident to every estate descendable Coke l. 4. f. 22. So now uses have the reputation of inheritances descendable the common law shall direct the descent of those and that there shall be possessio fratris of an use as of other inheritances at the common law 5. E. 4. 7. And of lands in Burrough English the use shall descend to the puisne and now also these uses being turned into estates shall be determined in all respects as estates in possession 23. H. 8. Finch Nomot But this difference is put between inheritances in copy hold lands and inheritances in uses in that such câ—stomary inheritaners shall not have by the Law any other collaterall quallities which concerne not the descent of inheritance which uses and other inheritances at the common law have as tenancy by courtesie or asseâ—s to charge the heire in an Action of debt upon an obligation made by his Ancestor for him and his heirs Coke l. 4. f. 22. a. or descent to take away entry as if a copyholder in right of his wife surrender it to the use of another in see and dieth that shall not be any discontinuance to the feme but that she and her heires may enter Ib. f. 23. Neither shall the feme of customary tenant be endowed unless it be by speciall custome Ib. f. 30. b. and generally copy-hold estates shall not have such qualities which estates at the common Law have without speciall custome Ib. f. 23. a. A Simili from the like NVllum simile currit quatuor pedibus Coke l. 7 f. 34 no like thing runs upon four feet and Coke l. 4. f. 18. b. Nullum simile est idem nothing that is like is the same Sir Gilbert Gerrards case upon an action of slander the Plaintiffe counteth that he was seised of a Mannor c. in fee and that he was in communication to demise the said land to R. E. and that the Defendant not ignorant thereof said I have a Lease of the said Mannor for ninety yeares and that by reason of the said words the said R. E. did not accept of the said Lease to the damage c. The Defendant pleaded that tâ—lis indentura qualis in the Count was alledged came to the hands of the Defendant by finding and it was resolved that that manner of pleading was not a direct answer to the indenture mentioned in the Count for talis indentura is not eadem indentura for no like is the same Eadem simili ratione suadente idem jus statuendum est Reg. I. C. Vbi eadem est ratio ibâ— est idemjus Coke com f. 191. a. It is one of the Maximes of the common Law cited by Littleton that in all cases where there is the like reason there is the like law for reason is the soule of the law and ratio potest allegari deficiente lege and reason may be alledged where the Law is wanting and then as Bâ—actâ—n De similibus ad similia eadem ratione pâ—oâ—â—dendum est From the like unto the like by the same reason we are to proceed and so argumentum a simili iâ— good in law Et quod in uno similium valet valebit in altero what availeth in one of the likes shall availe in the other as one shall recover in value against the heire upon the Ancestors warranty Lands which the heire tooke in exchange for Lands descended 1â— H. 3. rec va 26. for the similitude of the same reason A Mannor is given by Fine A Scâ—â—e facias lyeth of a tenancy that after escheated to the said Mannor 48. E. 3. 11. If a Mannor descend to an heire within age and after a tenancy escheateth he shall have his age of it in a praecipe of the mannor it shall be assets by descent and he may vouch of this tenancy by reason of a warranty made of the Mannor for the same reason 6. H. 4 1. And for the same reason a Lease for a thousand daies is a Lease for yeares 14. H. 8. 13. And a Lease for years and a release amounteth to a feoffment Brook The Maxime of a Bastard is eigne that the mulier puisne must make an entry upon him or else he gaineth the right yet a continuall claime made by the mulier puisne destroyeth his right for it is all one as if he had entred 14. H. 4. 9. If a man licenceth one to occupy his Land for a yeare this is a Lease for a yeare 5. H. 7. 1. And this is also according to the rule of the civill law ubi est eadem ratio eadem equitas ibi debet esse eadem juris dispositio where there is the same reason and the same equity there ought to be the same disposition of right Coke com f. 10. a. As in Feoffments and grants the word heires maketh an inheritance so doth it in exchanges releases and confirmations which enure by way of enlargement of an estate as also in warranties bargaine and sales by deed indented and enrolled and the like in which the word heires is also necessary because they stand upon the same reason that feoffements and grants doe for where there is the same reason there is the same law Coke com f. 55. 56. If Lessee at will soweth the Land and the Lessor after it is sown before the corne is ripe put him out yet the Lessee shall have the corne and shall have ingresse egresse and regresse to cut and carry away the Corne and if the corne be ripe and ready to cut downe and the Lessor before the Lessee reapeth it enter and putteth out the Lessee without all question the Lessee shall have the corn for by the same reason that he shall have it where he is put out before it is ripe he shall have it where he is put out after it is ripe for where there is the same reason there is the same law A majori minori From the greater and the Lesser IN eo quod plus est semper inest minus Reg. I. C. Omne majus continet in se minus Coke l. 4. f. 46. a. The greater alwaies containeth in it the lesse as whereas by the statute of 3. H. 7. c. 1. It is provided that if Murderers and accessaries or any of them be acquitted upon inditement or the principall is attainted c. the wife or heire to him slaine may have their appeale against the persons so acâ—uitted or against the principall so attainted and that the benefit of his Clergy thereof before be not had It was resolved that the word Attaint of murther in that act
entire and whereof no division can be made by metes and bounds a woman cannot be endowed of the thing it selfe yet the woman shall be endowed thereof in a speciall and certaine manner whereby shee may have satisfaction as of a Mill a woman shall not be endowed by metes and bounds nor in common with the heire but either shee may be endowed of the third tole-dish or of the whole Mill by every third moneth and so of a villaine either the third dayes worke or every third weeke or moneth So a man shall be endowed of the third part of the profits of stallage of the third part of the profits of a Faire or of the third part of the profits of the Marshalsey of the third part of the profits of keeping of a Park of the third part of the profits of a Dove-house and likewise of a third part of a Piscary by the third Fish or the third cast of the Net or the third Presentation to an advowson and a Writ of Dower lyeth for the third part of the profits issuing out of the custody of a Goale of the third part of the profits of Courts Fines and Heriots and a woman shall be endowed of tithes and the surest endowment of tithes is of the third sheafe for what Land shall be sowen is uncertaine Exception But in some cases of Lands and Tenements which are divisible and which the heire of the husband shall inherit the wife shall not be endowed as if the husband maketh a Lease for life of certaine Lands reserving a rent to him and his heires and after taketh a wife and dyeth the wife shall not be endowed neither of the reversion because there was no seisin in Deed or in Law of the free-hold or the rent because the husband had but a particular estate therein and no Fee-simple Coke com f. 32. a. vide ibidem plura Impossibile est unum corpus in duobus locis esse simul it is impossible for one body to be at two places at one and the same time Pop. Rep. 58. 3. 4. Eliz. As if a man make a lease of two Barnes rendring rent and for default of payment a re-entry if the tenant be at one of the Barnes to pay the rent and the Lessor at the other to demand the rent and no body be there to pay it yet the Lessor cannot enter for the condition broken because there was no default of the tenant he being at one Barne for it was not possible for him to be in two places together and Popbam Walmestâ— and Fenner said that also perhaps that the tenant had not money sufficient to pay it at either of the places but it is sufficient for him to have and provide one rent which cannot be at two places together ibidem Jura naturalia sunt immutabilia Bracton l. 9. c. 23. Coke l. 7. f. 15. b. The Laws of nature are unalterable as if a man have a ward by reason of a Signiory a signiory and is outlawed he forfeiteth his wardship to the King but if a man have the ward-ship of his own son or daughter which is heire apparent and is outlawed he doth not forfeit this ward-ship for nature hath annexed it to the person of the father 33. H. 6. 55. In the same manner maris faminae conjunctio est de jure naturae the conjunction of a man and a woman is of the law of nature as Bract. l. 1. c. 33. Dr. and Student c. 31. doe hold now if he that is attainted of felony or treason is slaine by one who hath no authority or executed by him who hath authority but pursueth not his warrant in this case his eldest son can have no appeale for he must bring his appeale as heire which being ex provisione hominis he loseth it by the attainder of his father but his wife if any he have shall have an appeal because she is to have her appeale as his wife which she retaineth notwithstanding the attainder because the conjunction of man and woman is by the law of nature and therefore it being to be intended of true and right matrimony is indissoluble and this is proved by the book 33. H. 6. f. 57. So if there bee mother and daughter and the daughter is attainted of felony now cannot she be heire to her mother for the cause aforesaid yet after her attainder if she killeth her mother this is parricide and petit treason for yet she remaineth her daughter for that is of nature All which accord with the rule of the civil law jura sanguinis nullo modo dirimi possunt the lawes of consanguinity and the lawes of blood can no way be broken and therefore the corruption of blood taketh away the privity of the heire which is nomen juris and not the privity of the son which is nomen naturae as if an attainted person be killed by his son this is petty treason for the privity of the son still remaineth but if a man attainted be murdered by a stranger the eldest son shall not have the appeale because the appeale is given to the heire for the youngest sons shall not have it 36. H. 6. 57. 58. 21. E. 3. 17. If the son be attainted and the father covenanteth in consideration of naturall love to stand seised of Land to his use this is a good consideration to raise an use because the privity of naturall affection remaineth So if a man attainted have a Charter of pardon and be returned on a jury betweene his son and I. S. the challenge remaineth for he may maintaine any suit of his son though the blood be corrupted If a villaine be attainted yet the Lord shall have the issues of the villaine borne before or after the attainder for the Lord hath them jure naturae as the increase of a flock Bacons Maxims f. 49. and 50. vide ibidem plura If the father be slaine the son shall have an appeale of it for it is a loss to the son to lose the father and the common law giveth the appeale to the son before any other for the earnest intent of revenge which the law supposeth to be in him against the offender for the killing of him and that the son by presumption had the more great love and affection Ployd ibid. f. 304. b. And from thence Bromly said that it was an ancient usage when a felon was found guilty in an appeale of murder that all those of the blood of him was murdered should draw the felon with a long cord to execution which was grounded upon the loss that all the blood had by the murder of one of them Ployd 406. b. Ed. 6. 3. The father being impleaded made a feoffment to his eldest son and heire apparent hanging the suit and the King brought a writ of Champerty against the father and son and by the opinion of most the action was not maintainable because by any law the son is to aide the father and
Coke com f. 25. a. A devise cannot direct an inheritance to descend contrary to the rules of the Common Law as if a man devise Lands to one and the heires males of his body and hath issue a Daughter who hath issue a Son the Son shall not inherit as heire male because he must convey the descent from the heires males for though a devise may create an inheritance by other words then a gift can yet can it not direct an inheritance to descend contrary to the rule of Law and no intent of the devisor appeareth that the Son of the Daughter should against the rule of the Law inherit vide Ployd f. 414. b. So if a gift be made to a man and the heirs females of his hody and hath issue a Son who hath issue a Daughter this Daughter shall never inherit vide ibidem plura Prâ—ximus sum egomet mihi Ployd f. 545 a. It is the naturall order to karve himselfe before he karve another and charity beginneth at home And therefore in legacies it is reason that the Executors shall have preferment of satisfaction before others and the Law maketh allowance to them before any others because as Lit. faith they represent the person of the Testator and Coke com f. 209. b. The Executors doe more represent the person of the Testator then the heire doth to the Ancestor for though the Executor be not named in Mortgage yet the Law appointeth him to receive the mony but so doth not the Law appoint the heire to receive the mony unlesse he be named and therefore if the Obligee maketh the Obligor his Executor it is a release in Law and if the Obligor make the Obligee his Executor the Action is gone for they are as it were the same person in law whence the law maketh allowance to them before any other For if a man devise to A. 20 l. and to B. 20 l. and to C. 20 l. and maketh his executor and dieth having goods only to the value of 20 l. now it is in the election of the executor to which of those three he will pay the 20 l. and if he pay it to one the other cannot contradict it neither hath he any remedy for his legacy so by the same reason if one of the three be made executor to the testator the law saith he may and will retaine the 20 l. in satisfaction of his legacy and the law alloweth of it for it is reason that he be next to himselfe and have regard to himselfe before another And this is the reason of the case in 12. H. 4. f. 21. where in debt upon an obligation against the heir he pleaded that the Plaintiff was executor to Lancestor which deed he put before them and administred certaine goods and Chattels to the value of the debt and more and retained the same summe with him in the name of payment and demanded judgement if Action And Hull said that if he did not retaine the same to himselfe and might have retained it and did not he shall be barred for a man is bound to be next to himself and this was the opinion of some of them for which he pleaded there that he adminstred no goods after the death of the Testator vide ibidem plura in Paramers case And for the same reason doth the law in all reciprocall acts respect mutuall recompence and consideration for if there be no consideration why should they be made Doct. and St. and it is supposed there was error in such Acts because there is no consideration of profit for every one is next unto himselfe ad suum lucrum satis sapit is sufficiently wise to project his owne emolument And therefore have considerations a great effect in lawes and customes for consideration is the beginning of all customes the grounds of all uses the reason of all rights and the causes of all duties For without consideration nothing is wrought by any conveyance no interest transferred no right removed nor duty accrued and no custome hath continuance As if the Lord of the Manner prescribe that every one who passeth the highway which lyeth in his Mannor shall pay 12. d. to him for his passage this is void and not upon good consideration but if he prescribe to have a penny of every one that passeth such a Bridge which the Lord of the Mannor doth use to repaire this is a good prescription Calthrope Copy-holds f. 35. and 36. And therefore is consideration described by Dier f 336. to be the cause or occasion of a meritorious recompence either in deed or law for all contracts and bargaines have quid pro quo contractus est quasi actus contra actum and must have quid pro quo Coke com f. 47. b. And so it is in exchanges annuities pro consilio impendendo or service rents services and tenures for dâ—meanes of Lands as Frank-almoigne Homage-auncestrell for warranty and acquittall commons for cause of vicinage or service Devise of a woman causa matrimonij praelocuti so the manner of a gift to doe such a thing or to make such a thing Considerations are either executory or executed and in considerations executory the recompence failing the Feoffment or grant ceaseth as a feoffment to instruct the feoffor in one mistery or Art if the Feoffor dieth before instruction the heir shall re-enter 21. E. 3. Grant of an Office and for the executing it a fee if the office be determined the fee is determined M. 5. E. 4. 7. and 20. E. 4. If a woman give land causa matrimonii prelocuti and he will not marry her she shall have a writ to recover the land Ployd f. 58. a. If a man make a lease for yeares rendring rent the lessee needeth not pay any rent if the Lessor had nothing in the land at the time of the lease because he had not quid pro quo Coke com f. 47. b. If I grant an annuity pro consilio impendendo if he wil not give me councell I must stay my annuity Ployd 144. b. An usuall and accustomed attendance of a corodian upon the Soveraigne of a monastery upon festivall daies determineth the corodie it being a reward for attendance Exchanges not executed by each party at the first is defeasible 9. H. 4. A portion of rithes granted by indenture for ever without cavillation or contradiction and an annuity granted for the aforesaid portion So to have a way for my life and I grant an annuity of 20 s. without limitation the annuity shall endure but during my life Dier 336. 337. Where no consideration is expressed there the consideration may be averred Dier 146. Vellies case A rehersall of a consideration past whether it be true or false shall not dissolve the gift as because he served me in the Wars beyond the Seas although it be false it is not materiall Bracton in modis donationum and so in the case of the King Dier f. 337. If A. enfeoff B.
if he be an honest man Swimb f. 210. It is an observation of a Divine that oathes ex officio had their birth from Caiphas Math. 26. who who first imposed it on our Saviour in the name of the living God saying I adjure or charge thee in the name of the living God that thou tellest us whither thou be'st Christ the Son of the living God And Mr. Pryn saith that Cardinall Woolsy the highest Priest in England was the first that invented oathes ex officio in England and that they were much inveighed against by Latimer in his Sermons and condemned by the expresse words of the petition of right providing against such oathes Prin. Vind. f. 42. Impotentia excusat legem impotency excuseth the Law Coke com f. 29. a. The Law tendreth the weaknesses and debilities of others execuseth their un-abilities ultra posse non est esse because no man is able to doe more then he can do As if a man dyeth seised of Lands in fee-simple c. and these Lands descend to his Daughter and shee taketh an husband and hath issue and dyerh before any entry the husband shall not be tenant by courtesy because it was in the power of the husband to have entred but if a man be seised of an advowson or a rent in fâ—e and hath issue a daughter who is married and hath issue and dyeth seised the wife before the rent became due or the Church became void dyeth he shall be Tenant by courtesy because he could by no industry enter or attaine to any other seisin then a seisin in Law or bring it to an actuall seisin And f. 258. b Though an Hermite or an Anachorite be shut up himself so as by his order he is not to come out in person yet to avoid a descent he may command one to make claim and such a recluse may allwayes appeare by an Attorney in such cases where others must appeare in proper person and f. 263. b. An Abbot of a Monastery dyeth and during the vacation one wrongfully entreth into a certaine parcell of the Land of the Monastery claiming the Land to him and his heirs and dyeth seised and the Land descendeth to the heire and then one is elected Abbot the Abbot may enter upon the heire for by the death of the Abbot no person is able to make continuall claime and therefore a descent in that kind shall not prejudice the succession Coke l. 1. f. 98. a. If the Lessee Covenant to leave wood in the same plight the wood was at the time of the lease and afterwards the trees be sub-verted by tempest hs is discharged of his covenant by reason of his impotency and l. 4. f. 11. a. If the Lord release to the Tenant so long as I. S. hath heire of his body and sixty years passe and then I. S. dyeth without heire of his body in this case though the sixty years be passed yet the Lord may distraine for it was impossible that she should attaine to any seisin within that time and therefore the act of limitation made in 32. H. 8. doth not extend to such rent or service that by common possibility could not happen or become due within sixty years and so if Land holden by Homage and Fealty be conveyed to a Mayor and Commonalty c. in this case they cannot doe their Homage and Fealty yet though they have enjoyed the Land above sixty years if they alien the Land the Lord may distraine for Homage and Fealty 33 H 8. Br. Tit. Fealty 15. vide ibidem pluta in Bevills case and lib. 6. f. 21. b. in Butlers case It was resolved that legall imprisonment without Covin is a good excuse of non-residency in any Parson by reason of his impotency Quod remedio destituitur ipsa revalet si culpa ab sit the thing which is destitute of remedy availeth in the matter it selfe if there be no fault or laches in the party Coke l. 6. f. 68. a. As if a man be seised of a manner part of which is in lease for life and part in lease for yeares and levieth a fâ—ne to A. to the use of B. in tail with diverse remainders over in this case B. shall avow for rent or have an Action of Wast without any Attornement for when the reversion is setled in any one in judgement of Law and he hath no meanes to compell the tenant to attorne and no laches or fault is in him there he shall avow or have an Action of Wast without Attornment As if the Lord in Mortmaine or if a villaine claimeth a reversion by this claime the Law vesteth thiS reversion in him and he hath no meanes to compell the tenant to attorne and therefore he shall avow or have an Action of Wast without Attornement the same Law is of Letters Patents and of the devise of a reversion for in all those cases culpa abest there is no fault 9. H. 6. vide ibidem plura in Sir Moile Finches case And Coke l. 8. f. 172. b. in Hales case If the heire at full age tender his livery and dyeth within three months before he hath accomplished it so as the making of his homage or suing out of his livery without default in him is become impossible by the act of God he shall have as much advantage by his tender as if he had made homage or sued out his livery for impotency in this case excuseth the Law and in the judgement of the Law the interest of the King by the said limitation is determined as if the Lord had taken homage of the heire when he made his tender vide ibidem plura Coke l. 10. f. 139. b. If tenant for life or for years doth not repaire a wall of dirt so as by his default the Land is surrounded and becometh unprofitable that is Wast but if the Land be surrounded by the extraordinary rage and violence of the Sea without any default in him that is not Wast no more then if an house was burnt by lightning or subverted by the rage of the wind or tempest without default of the Lessee for impotency excuseth the party vide ibidem plura in Kighleys case So as it is regularly true that the Law tendreth the infirmities of unable persons and excuseth their impossibilities as of men illiterate out of the Realme in Prison Infants Idiots out of their sound minde as also of blind and deafe dumbe and blind If a man illiterate be bound to make a deed he is not bound to seale or deliver any writing that shall be tendred unto him and if it be Latine or other Language which he understandeth not he may demand that one read it and expound it unto him and if none be there present to read and expound it the party may refuse to deliver it for his ignorance excuseth him Coke l. 2. f. 3. Mansers case And for that reason if the Deede be read unto him in other words then are contained within
remotissime vana which by the intendement of the Law never cometh into act Coke l. 2. f. 5. 2. n. b. in Sir Hugh Chomleys case vide ibidem plura And hereby the way may pertinently be observed that a possibility cannot be released as if before judgement the Plaintiff in an action of debt releaseth to the baile in the Kings Bench all demands and after judgement is given this shall not bar thee to have execution against the baile because at the time of the release he had but a meere possibility and neither jus in re or jus ad rem but the duty is to commence after upon a contingent and therefore could not be released presently So if the Conusee of a Statute release to the Conusor all his right in the Land yet afterward he may sue execution for he hath no right to the Land till execution but onely aâ— possibility and so have I known it adjudged Coke com f. 265. b. So if A. grant to B. that if he doe such an act he shall have an annuity of twenty pounds during his life before the Act done he cannot release the annuity Coke l. 1. in Albanys case Lex semper dabit remedium the law so favoreth right that it will suffer things against the principles of Law rather then a man to be without his remedy As a man who is outlawed may bring an action to reverse it an outlawry there is no Plea 4. H. 7. 40. The Tenant shall have a replevin against the Lord that did wrongfully distraine though the beasts be come back to himself because he can have no action of trespasse against him for that prisall and shall recover damages for the tortious prisall F. n. b. f. 69. H. A man after judgement is passed against him shall plead against the King a Charter of pardon or any such thing done in the meane betwixt the verdict and the judgement because against the King he can have no Audita querela 11. H. 7.10 otherwise it is against a common person And therefore is it a principle in Law cuicumque aliquis quid concedit concedere videtur id sine quo res ipsa esse non potest Coke l. 11. f. 52. a. Which Ploydon thus expresseth that it is held as a maxime in 2. R. 2. in trespasse that if any man hath interest to any thing by the grant and assent of another and the party who hath such interest cannot have the principall thing without doing the other thing that he may doe the said other thing and justify it because it is a meanes to come to his profit for there it is holden That if one grant to me all his Trees growing in his Woods I may cut them down and carry them through all his Land and though his Grasse be spoiled with the carriage he shall not have a Writ of trespasse of it for Trees are such things that if they be not carryed by Carts he cannot have them nor make his profit of them But if one sell all his Fish in his Pond and the Vendee dig a trench so as the water may run out that by such meanes he may take the Fish an action of trespasse will lye against the Vendee because he might take the Fish by Nets or other Engines but if there had been no other meanes to take them it had been otherwise and to come to the banks to fish he may well justify it for without it he cannot take them by any meanes so as a man shall alwayes justify the necessary circumstance where he hath title to the principall thing Ployd f. 15. 16. a. vide ibidem plura in Renigers case So when a Lessor in the Lease except the Trees and after hath an intention to sell them the Law giveth to him and to those who will buy them power as incident to the exception to enter and shew the Trees to those who will have them for without entry they cannot view and without view they cannot buy Coke l. 11. f 52. in Lisords case So 19. H. 6.29 A man seised of a mese in a Burrough c. devisable deviseth it to his wife in taile and that if his wife dye without issue that his Executor may sell it and it dispose for his soule in this case the Executor may by the Law enter into the house to see whether it be well repaired or no to the intent to know at what valew he may sell the reversion And the Law giveth power to him who will repaire a Bridge to enter in the Land and to him who hath a Conduit within the Land of another to enter into the Land for it to mend as cause shall require as it is resolved in 9. E. 4.35 Coke ibidem vide plura And Coke l. 5. f. 12. a. If a man hath Mines hidden within his Land and leaseth his Lands and all his Mines in it there the Lessor may dig for them for quando aliquis quid concedit c. and this accordeth with 9. E. 4.8 that if a man lease his Land to another in which there is a Mine to wit an hidden Mine he cannot dig for it and if he doe it is wast but if he lease his Lands and all the Mines in it it is otherwise for the reason aforesaid vide ibidem plura in Saunders case If tenant at will soweth Corne on the ground and the Lessor out him he shall have free entry egresse and regresse to carry it away for when the Law giveth any thing to any one it giveth implicitly whatsoever is necessary for the taking and enjoying of the same and the Law driveth him not to an action for the Corne but giveth him a speedy remedy to enter into the Land and to take and carry it away and compelleth not him to carry it at one time or to carry it before it be ready to be carryed and if the Lessee be disturbed of this way the Law doth give unto him he shal have his action upon the case and recover his damages for whensoever the Law giveth any thing it giveth a remedy for the same Coke com f. 56. a. If there be Lord Mesne and Tenant and the Lord purchaseth the tenancy in fee the mesnalty is extinct but whereas the tenant held of the meane by five shillings and the mesne of the Lord by twelve pence so as he hath more in advantage by foure shillings he shall have the foure shillings as a rent-seck yearly of the Lord and yet he shall distraine for it for seeing the mesnalty is extinct the Law reserveth the distresse to the rent for quando lex aliquid concedit c. And therefore if a man maketh a Lease for life reserving a rent and bindeth himselfe in a Statute and hath the rent extended and delivered unto him he shall distraine for the rent because it cometh to him by course of Law Multa constituuntur in lege ne curia Domini Regis deficeret in Justitia
it shall be apportioned vide ibidem plura If a man be bound to appeare at a day before Justices at which day the obligor casteth him into Prison so as he cannot come the bond is saved otherwise if he were in Prison for Felony or any other misdemeanor for that is his own act and fault 32. H. 6. Bar 60. Or if he cast himselfe into Prison Nâ—y Max. f. 13. An infants appeale shall not stay for his full age for he shall not take advantage of his own wrong 27. H. 8. 11. One in Execution escapeth and the Goaler taketh him againe the party if he will may have him to remaine in Prison in execution for him still for the escape is his own wrong 13. H. 7. 1. So Coke l. 3. in Britons case If one in Prison upon execution escape if he be taken he shall not bring an Audita querela to discharge himselfe of his imprisonment for he shall not take advantage of his own wrong He that is party to a wrong shall not take advantage by the same wrong Perk. 41. b. As if Lessor and Lessee for yeares joyne in the cutting downe of twenty Oakes the Lessor shall not punish him in a Writ of Wast and take advantage of his own wrong The heire which is party to the death of his Father shall not have an appeale of it And if issue in taile disseise the Discontinuee of his Father and then enfeoff his Father and his Father then dyeth seised and the issue in tail enter he shall not be remitted If Lessee for life of one Acre of Land leaseth the same Acre to his Lessor for yeares the remainder to a stranger in fee and maketh livery and seisin to the Lessor accordingly it is no forfeiture Perkins ib. If tenant for terme of life enfeoff the feme of the Lessor of the same Land leased and maketh a Letter of Attorny to the Lessor to make livery and seisin and he doth so accordingly it is no forfeiture Perk. ibidem f. 42. a. If an house fall down by tempest the Lessee for life or yeares hath a speciall interest to take Timber to reedify the same if he will for his habitation but if the Lessee pull down the house the lessor may take the Timber as parcell of his inheritance and besides have an action of Wast and recover treble damages Coke l. 4 f. 63. a. in Harlackendems case A deviseth lands to B. untill eight hundred pounds be levied for the marriage of his daughters his Son and Heire entreth and concealeth the will receiveth the profits before the will is discovered then the devisee entreth receiveth the profits until they amount to six hundred and forty pounds the heir is to supply the rent for the heire shall not take advantage of his own wrong Coke l. 4. Dormit Lex aliquando jus moritur nunquam Coke com 279. b. For as Littleton there hath it it is commonly said that a right cannot dye For of such an high estimation is right in the eye of the Law as that the Law preserveth it from death and destruction trodden it may be but not trodden out for where it hath been said that a release of right doth in some cases enure by way of extinguishment it is so to be understood as here Littleton saith in respect of him that maketh the release or else in respect by construction of Law it enureth not alone to him to whom it is made but to others also who be strangers to the release which as hath been sayd is a quality of an inheritance extinguished As if there be Lord and Tenant and the Tenant maketh a Lease for life the remainder in fee If the Lord release to the Tenant for life the rent is wholly extinguished and he in the remainder shall take benefit thereof and even so when the heire of a disseisor is disseised and the disseisor maketh a release for life the remainder in fee if the first disseisee release to the Tenant for life this shall enure by way of extinguishment because it shall enure to him in the remainder who is a stranger to the release and yet in truth the right is nor extinguished but followeth the possession to wit the tenant for life hath it during his time and he in the remainder to him and his heirs and the right of the Inheritance is in him in the remainder for a right to Land cannot dye or be extinct in deed and therefore if after the death of tenant for life the heire of the disseisor bring a Writ of right against him in the remainder and he joyne the Mise upon the meere right it shall be found for him because in Judgement of Law he hath by the said release the right of the Disseisee for it is commonly and truly said that right never dyeth but is transferred and conveyed by Feoffments Grants Confirmations Prescriptions or Fines c. releases from one man to another so as the Species of it continually remaineth Res inter alios acta alteri nocere non debet factum unius alteri nocere non debet Coke com f. 152. b Things acted among others ought not to hurt either and one mans deed ought not to hurt another and Coke l 9 f. 59. It is the rule of Law and reason prohibetur ne quis faciat in suo quod nocere possit in alieno sic utre tuo ut alienum non laedas it is forbidden least any one should doe that in his own that may hurt another and so use your own that you injure not another If a man hath a Water-course running in a channell of a River up to his house for his necessary ules and a Glover levy a Lime pit for Calve-skins and Sheep-skins so neer his Water-course that the corruption of the Lime pit hath corrupted it by which his tenants goe out of his house for it an action of the case lyeth as is adjudged in 13. H. 6. 26. b. So he who hath severall Piscaries in his own Water shall have an action of the case against him who erecteth a Dye-house by which he maketh slime filth and other dirty things to run out of the said house into the said Piscaries by which he hath totally lost the profit of the said Piscaries vide in the Book of Entries Nusance f 406. b. vide the same in Aldreds case for erecting of a Swine-house plura alia ibidem And so also in Penruddocks case Coke l. 5. and in Batius case l. 11. 54. Where you shall find diverse notable cases to the same purpose Lessee for yeares shall so take his hedge-boote that he doth not destroy common of Estovers which another man hath there 46. E. 3. 17. He which hath common in Land not inclosed shall keep his Cattle out of a stranges Land 20 E. 4. 11. If Beasts be driven by the high way he ought at his perill to keep them out of the Lands adjacent to the high way
enfeoffed him long before the judgment in fee absque hoc that he was seised at the time of the judgement or any time after whereupon issue was taken and the Jury found the Feoffment and further sayd That it was made by covin to defraud the Plaintiff and other Creditors and it was judged for the Plaintif vide ibidem plura and fol. 166. Fraus praesumitur si insolitae clausulae apponantur Reg. J. C. and Coke l. 3. f. 81. Clausulae insuetae semper inducunt suspicionem As there in Twins case A Deed of gift was in part adjudged fraudulent because an unusuall clause was inserted in it and for that the Deed contained that the gift was made honestly truely and bona fide vide ibidem plura Dona clandestina sunt semper suspiciosa Coke l. 3. f. 81. Gifts in secret are alwayes subject to the suspition of fraud which there in Twins Case was one of the reasons alledged to prove a Deed of gift fraudulent to wit that it was made in secret And so in Burrels case l. 6. f. 72. the assignment of a Lease was taken to be fraudulent because it was delivered in a secret manner to a person of meane quality And for the same reason by livery and seisin in one County the Lands in another County will not passe Noys Max f. 3. Jus fraus nunquam cohabitant simul Coke l. 10 f. 49. a. Right and fraud never cohabit or dwell together As a Recovery cannot be sayd to be by collusion where tenant in taile is in the Recovery whether he be tenant in Deed or tenant in Law as a Vouchee For the Law hath made all the reversions and remainders as incidents to his estate subject to his pleasure and he hath right and power to bar them all ibidem And Coke l. 8 f 132 b. Covin cannot be alledged in doing of a lawfull act As in a Writ of Dower against a disseisor if the Tenant plead in abatement of the Writ entry by the disseisee the demandant shall not be received to aver the entry to be by covin to abate the writ because the entry is congeable and lawfull and mixed with no wrong as it is holden in 15. E. 4. f. 4. and if a disseisor or an abator endow a feme who hath title of dower it is good because it is a lawfull act Coke l. 5. f. 30. b. Fraus meretur fraudem Ployd f. 100. and the Poet Fraus est concessa repellere fraudâ—m Fraud and subtilty deserveth fraud and subtilty and it is a lawfull deceit to repell a deceit As in 19 E. 4. f. 27. In appeale of many who pleaded not guilty a Venire facias was awarded against them all and the Court perceiving that the prisoners were in opinion to sever in the challenge of the whole pannell of subtilty to stay the tryall at that time and that every prisoner would challenge as many as they might without danger to wit twenty and that every of them shall have his entire number of twenty so that one shall not be excluded of his number by the challenge of the other and that there was but a small number of men of sufficiency then in the City to be sworne so as by that subtilty the tryall should be stayed for the present The Court agreed that the first pannell and the Tales should be divided and made severall for every one of the prisoners And accordingly said to the prisoners We perceive your subtilty well enough which deserveth little favour of the Court and therefore tell us whether you will agree in your challenges for if you will not the Clarke shall sever the pannell and then they all agreed in their challenges and after the inquest was full evidence was given and there found and one subtilty prevented and repelled by another And this fraud by the Canonists is called Benus dolus of which they have this rule Frangenti fidem fides frangetur eidem To him who breaks his faith no faith is to be shewne And instance in the example of Salomon who did use such cunning betweene the two Harlots in searching out who was the true and naturall Mother of the childe Fulb. 2. l. f. 23. Vendens eandem rem duobus falsarius est Reg. I.C. Coke l. 1. f. 45. a. A man selling the same thing to two is a falfe dealer and therefore in the grant of the King it is dishonourable for him to grant the same possession to one that he or his Progenitors had granted to another for he that selleth the same thing to two persons is a deceiver Fraudis interpretatio non semper ex mente duntaxat sed ex consilio quoque desideratur Reg. I. C. Dolus circuitu non tollitur Coke l. 11. f. 74. a. nec purgatur Bacon Max. f. 3. The interpretation of fraude is not allwayes to be gathered out of the mind but also from the councell and consent and crafty dealing and deceite is not taken away nor purged by the circuity of shifting it from one to another and though covenous acts be conveyed through many hands and mediations yet the Law taketh hold of the corrupt beginning and proceeding As if I make a Feoffment of Lands held in Knights service to I. S. upon condition that within a certaine time he shall enfeoff I.D. which Feoffment of I. D. shall be to the use of the wife of the first feoffor for her joynture c. this Feoffment is within the Statute of 32. H. 8. Bacon ibidem So if one who hath an intention to sell his Land by fraud conveyeth it by deed enrolled to the Queen with an intent to deceive the purchasor and after selleth that Land to another for a valuable consideration and maketh a conveyance accordingly in this case the purchasor shall enjoy the Land against the Queene by the Statute of 27. Eliz. c. 4. For though the Queene be not excepted yet the act being generall and made for the suppression of fraud shâ—ll bind the Queen and whosoever maketh the Queen who is the Fountaine of Justice to be an Instrument of covin and fraud and upon it obtaineth Letters Patents such Letters Patents are void or if the Queen be indeavored to take away another mans right and to that end a man obtaineth Letters Patents they shall be repealed though such covin and fraud be not contained in the grant made to the Queen but appeareth onely by averrement dehors for fraud and deceite is not taken away or diminished by the subtility of alienations Coke ibidem in Magdalens Colledge case Non facies malum ut inde fiat bonum it is the Law of God thou shall not doe evill that good may come thereof Coke l. 5. f. 30. b. lib. 11. f 7. 4 a. What hath been said of truth and falsity may be said of good and evill and are so semblable that an apparent good is often mistaken for that which is reall Jun. s 14. Fallit enim vitium
stranger tendreth them mony for the Land and they intending to sell it more deere defer the sale for two yeares and take the profits themselves the heire for the laches and long delay may enter and put them out of the Land 38. Ass Pl. 3. 39. Ass Pl. 3. A man indebted by specialty or upon an account determined tendreth the mony to the Debtee after the day in which it was due and payable and it is refused and after mony is embased it seemeth to many that the debtor shall beare the losse although he had made tender at the very day of payment because he must say vncor prist Dyer f. 83. Pl. 76. Caveat Emptor Coke Com. f. 102. a. Let the the buyer be vigilant and wary what he buyeth for though by the Civill Law every man is bound to warrant the thing that he selleth and conveyeth yet the Common Law bindeth him nor unlesse there be a warranty either in Deed or in Law Ibi. Coke l. 4. f. 26. a. A Copy-holder who is out of possession ought not to sell his Land untill he hath gained the possession and if any one will purchase any title he is not to be favored but in such case Caveat Emptor let the buyer take heed for if any one hath a pretended right and title to Copy-hold Land bargaine and sell it to another it is within the Statute of 32. H. 8. c. 5. vide ibidem plura If I take an horse of another mans and sell him and the owner taketh him againe I may have an action of debt for the mony for the bargaine was perfect by the delivery of the horse Caveat Emptor Nay Max f. 94. If I sell my Horse to another man for ten hundred pounds who taketh his horse againe I shall have all the mony Ibidem f. 95. Qui timent caveant vitent Offi. of Exe. 251. They who feare are wary to shun dangers as an Executors office is dangerous and therefore ought to feare what encombrances fall on him and to keep goods to pay all debts if any should be concealed Non temere credere nervus est sapientiae Coke l. 5. f. 114. b. Not hastely to beleive is the sinew of wisdome and therefore the Law hath appointed the last time in the day to pay mony upon a condition that both parties may certainly meet together which is founded on the experience of the sages least any of the parties should be constrained to make a Letter of Attorny or repose confidence or trust in any other to pay it for him when he will doe it for himselfe And it is wisdome not rashly to trust any Caveat actor Reg. I. C. Let the actor beware what he doth One entreth into Bond to A. that he and A. shall stand to the Arbitrement of I. S. If A. refuse he him-himselfe shall take the forfeiture of the Bond. If a man have a Chappell which is his donation by Letters Patents and he presenteth me his clerk to the Ordinary he shal not make collation afterwards If a Parson impropriate presenteth one to a Church it maketh it disappropriate If he who holdeth his Land by homage and fealty taketh his Land of the King by office found that he holdeth it by forty shillings per annum he shall pay the rent hereafter Abundans cautela non nocet Coke l. 11 f. 6. b. An abundance of circumspection doth not hurt vide ibi Qui sentit onus sentire debet commodum Coke l. 1. f. 99. a. He who beareth the burden and taketh the paines ought to receive the profit as if a Feoffment be upon condition that if the Feoffor or his Heirs pay the sum of 20 l. or to doe any act before a certain day that they shall re-enter in this case if the father dye before the day of paymenr and the daughter for the safe-gard of the inheritance pay the mony or satisfieth the condition in this case the Son after borne shall not devest it for if the daughter had not performed the condition the Land had been utterly lost and therefore in this case a good argument may be made that the daughter shall detaine the Land for Qui sentit onus sentire debet Commodum ibidem vide Hobart Rrep fo 4. in Youngs and Radfords case Ployd f. 514. Trevilian was Tenant in tail of Tenements and he being only seised of such an estate a common recovery was had against him and Avice his wife who vouched over according to the course of common recoveries and it was found that the wife had nothing in the Tenements the husband dyeth the wife shall have nothing of the intended recompence in the case because she had nothing in the Tenements and so could lose nothing If Tenant for life or in Dower do devise the Corn growing on the ground upon the land at the time of their death this is a good Devise and he in the reversion shall not have it 4 H. 3. Devise 26. And the Statute of Merton which saith Omnes viduae possunt legare sua blada is but an affirmation of the common Law which was used in the time of H. 3. 19 H. 6. 6. A man seised of land in see in right of his wife leaseth the land to a stranger and the Lessee soweth the land and after the wife dyeth the Corn being not ripe the Lessee may devise the corn and yet his estate is determined 7 E. 3. 67. A man seised of land in the right of his wife and soweth it and deviseth the Corn growing on the ground and dyeth before it is severed the Devisee shall have it and not the wife 7. Ass pl. 19. One seised of lands in fee hath Issue a Daughter and dyeth his wife Privement Ensaint with a Son the Daughter entereth and soweth the land and before the severance a Son is born and his next friend entereth yet the Daughter may devise the Corn growing on the land If a Mannor be put in execution upon a Statute-merchant and the Conusee sow the land he may well devise the Corn growing on the ground Perkins f. 100. vide ibidem plura Qui sentit commodum sentire debet onus Cok. l. 5. f. 24. He that feeleth or reapeth the profit must bear the burthen and the charges A man leaseth an house by Indenture for years and the Lessee covenanteth for him and his Executors to repaire the house at all times necessary The Lessee assigneth it over to H. who suffereth it to decay the Lessee bringeth an action of Covenant against the Assignee and it was adjudged the action did lye in that the Lessee had taken upon him to bear the charges of reparation the annuall rent was the less which trenched to the benefit of the Assignee and he that enjoyeth the profit must bear the burthen and charges vide ibidem plura Co. l. 5. f. 100. a. The Statutes will have all those which are in perill and which are to take comodity by the
granteth a lease for life or yeares he hath the reversion in him which he may lawfully grant but the Law requireth in this case that he be not deceived in his estate and to grant the possession of the Land whereas he hath but a reversion and therefore when he granteth the Land notwithstanding that it be in lease for life or for yeares of Record or otherwise the grant is good When the words of a grant are not sufficient ex vi termini to passe the thing granted but the grant is utterly void there any non obstante cannot make the grant good vide ibidem plura Davis f. 75. In the case of Commendams By our Law what is wrong and malum insert and against the Law of God cannot be dispensed with and therefore 11 H. 7. 12. a. It is said that the King cannot dispense with any that doth nusance in the High-way and if he doth it that such a dispensation is void 8 H. 6. 19. The King cannot grant that if a man doth a trespasse to me that I shall not have an action against him or that a man shall be his own Judge and therefore it is often said in our Books that the prerogative of the King shall doe no wrong to the Subject 13 E. 3. 8 So though the King may dispense with a Statute which prohibiteth an indifferent thing to be done yet he cannot change the common Law by his Patent 37 H. 8. Patent 110. And as to the Pope it is often said in the Bishop of St. Davis case that the Bulls of the Pope cannot change the Lawes of England Notwithstanding the word non obstante was first invented and first used in the Court of Rome which as Sir John Davis observeth f. 69. b. was a mischeivous precedent to all the common Weales of Christendome for the temporall Princes perceiving that the Pope dispensed with his Canons in imitation of him have used their prerogative to dispense with their penall Lawes and Statutes and whereas before their Lawes were religiously observed as the Lawes of the Medes and Persians Davis f. 77. The Law which ordaineth that the first benefice shall be void by the acceptance of the second may be dispensed with and so is it of the Law that ordaineth that when a man is made a Bishop that his other Benefices shall be void as Thrining saith 11. H. 4. 213. b. For those Laws were made by Ecclesiasticall policy and therefore the same policy may dispense with those Laws permissio non est officium legis quia lex ad fert necessitatem Reg. I. C. permission is not the office of the Law for the Law bringeth necessity As by the Statute of W. 2. Lands were permitted to be entailed and usury also by many Statutes yet can they not properly be termed Lawes and Statutes Confessus in judicio pro judicato habetur quodam modo sua sententia damnatur Coke l. 11. f. 30. He who confesseth in the Court of Justice is holden adjudged and in a certaine manner is condemned by his own mouth or sentence And therefore the Attainder in confession is the strongest attainder may be for the vehement presumption it hath of truth for it should be absurd to say that he hath not done such a Felony since the party himselfe hath confessed it to the distruction of him and all his off-spring And the case of confession is a stronger case then guiltinesse by verdict for though he be found guilty by verdict yet may he be innocent and therefore at the common Law he may have his Clergy and make his purgation but if he had confessed the offence upon record he shall not have his Clergy at the common Law because he could not make his purgation when the Court findeth his confession on Record for in the intendement of the Law he cannot contrary his expresse and voluntary confession in Court vide ibidem plura In praesentia majoris cessat potentia minoris Manhood in Ployd f. 498. a. In the presence of the greater power the lesser power ceaseth All the Justices agreed that the Ordinary the Patron and King ought to agree in making an impropriation and the Ordinary is the principall aagent in it in that he hath the spirituall jurisdiction and the act of appropriation is a thing spirituall and what the Ordinary of the Diasis might doe that the Pope used to doe in the Realme as supreame Ordinary and was a long time suffered so to doe and did use to make appropriations without the Bishop which were taken to be good and the Bishop never contradicted but accepted them as good for in the power of the greater the power of the lesser ceaseth and in all Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction his authority was taken as absolute and did bind the Bishop as his inferior in all acts now such authority and jurisdiction as the Pope used within this Realme was acknowledged by the Parliament 25. H. 8 and other Statutes to be in the King and that he might lawfully doe all that the Pope was accustomed and used to doe within this Realme and from him it descended to his Son Edward who as superame Ordinary did make the appropriation of his own authority and jurisdiction without the Bishop and did put these words in his Charter authoritate nostra regia ecclesiastica qua fungimur vide ibidem plura Vectigal ab origine ipsa jus caesarum est patrimoniale lex imperatoria Custome from the beginning is the right and patrimony of Caesar and Emperors and are called vectigalia a mercibus evectis invectis from Merchandizes exported and imported for custom is a prerogative and benefit to which Kings and Princes are by the Law of Nations intitled And as the Law Nations were before Kings so Kings were made by the Lawes of Nations ex jure gentium originem suam traxerunt Baldus and as soone as they were made Kings presently the Law of Nations did annex the prerogative of custome to their severall Crownes so saith Baldus cum creatus fuerit Rex omnia regalia ei conceduntur competit omnibus regibus jus imponendi vectigalia when a King was created all royall incidents were granted to him and the right of imposing customes appertained to all Kings Wherein the rules of our Law as Davis observeth f. 12. are agreeable with those of the imperiall Law for we also say that custome is the ancient inheritance of the Crowne of England and that inheret sceptro and is as ancient as the Crowne it selfe and is due by common right and by prescription and not by the grant and benevolence of Merchants or by Act of Parliament Dier 165. b. And whereas by the imperiall Law Primaria vectigalium causa ac ratio fuit ut plana tutaque mercatori praetereunti itinera praestarentur Plin. l. 19. c. 4. The first cause and reason of customes was that plaine and safe voyages should be exhibited and assured to the Merchants and in our
of a Grant be good in parcels and for parcels not that which is for the advantage of the Grantee shall be taken to be good As if a man granteth unto me an annuity provided that it shall not charge his person the Proviso is void and the Grant good 20 E. 4 8. by Townsend 14 H. 4. 30. by Hank And if an annuity be granted pro consilio impendendo though the Grantee be well skilled in divers professions of art yet counsell shall be given in that faculty onely which was intended at the time of the Grant 4. 1. E. 3. 6. If the King grant to a man that he and his Heirs shall be quit of Tax for the lands which they have this is a good Grant though there be no Tax at the time of the Grant 38 H. 6. 10. And so is the Law of Tenths and fifteens ibidem Ployd f. 29. a. If a man maketh a Lease for life and after the decease of Tenant for life that the lands redibus to A. B. in fee it is held a good remainder because it is held for a principle that the Livery of every one shall be taken more strong against him 18 E. 3. f. 28. If a man give land to one haeredibus it shall be a Fee-simple without the word suis and though he doth not give him a Fee-simple expresly yet every mans livery shal be taken strongest against him Ployd f. 18 b.a. If I make a lease for years upon condition that one moneth after he shall have fee he shall have it after the moneth accordingly for the thing shall pass according to the convention more strong against the Donor Ployd ibidem So if I make a lease to two upon condition that if one doth dye within seven years that then after the death of the other it shall remain to a stranger in fee that remainder is good for the reason of the condition to give the estate to privies or strangers is all one in regard that he had first given an estate to which the condition may be annexed for the livery and limitation shall be taken strongest against him that made it ibidem If I give land to one filio suo primogenito and he hath no Son at the time of the gift and after he hath a Son that son shall have the land by way of remainder and yet the remainder was not out of the Lessor neither did it vest at the time of livery but the Law construeth the livery and limitation more strong against the Lessor P. 17 E. 3. f. 29. Ployd vide ibidem plura If two Tenants in Common grant a rent of ten shillings this is severall and the Grantees shall have twenty shillings But if they make a Lease and reserve ten shillings they shall have onely ten shillings between them So an Obligation to pay ten shillings at the feast of our Lord God it is no plea to say that he did pay it but he must shew at what time or else it will be taken that he paid it after the feast for every act shall be taken more strictly against him that made it Noy Max. f. 15. 2 E. 3. p. M f. 140 b. 161. b. A generall pardon ought to be taken more beneficially for the Subject against the King 37 H. 8. f. 21. Coke l. 4. Vaughans case If I. S. submit himselfe to arbitrement of all Actions and Suites between him and I D. and I. N. it shall be intended collective of joynt Actions and distributive of severall Actions also because the words shall be taken stronger against him that speaketh 2. R. 3. 18. 21. H. 7. 29. If I grant 10 l. rent to Baron and Feme and if the Baron dye the Feme shall have three pound rent it shall be strongest taken against me the grantor for three pounds addition to the ten 8. Ass Pl. 10. So if I sow all my Land with Corne and let it for yeares the Corne passeth to the Lessee if I except it not So if I have a free Warren in my owne Land and let my Land for life not mentioning the Warren yet the Lessee by implication shall have the Warren discharged and extracted during the Lease 8. A. 7 32. H. 6. If I. give Lands to I. S. and his heires males this is a good Fee-simple and the words males is void Bac. Max. f. 12. vide ibidem plura Yet this rule also faileth when another which the Law holdeth worthier cometh in place and which is of more equity and humanity It is a rule in the Civill Law valeant eo modo quo valere possunt and at the Common Law Benignae faciendae sunt interpretationes chartarum propter simplicitatem laicorum ut res magis valeat quam pereat Coke com f. 30 b. The interpretations of Deeds and charters because of the simplicity of the people are favorably to be made that the thing may rather stand and subsist then fall and perish and let all things stand by the same meanes they may stand And therefore if I give Lands to I. S. and his heires rendring five pounds yearly to I. D. and his heires this implyeth a condition to me that am the grantor Littleton yet were it a stronger exposition against me to say that the limitation shall be void and the Feoffment absolute So if a man make a lease to A. for yeares and after by his Deed the Lessor voluit quod haberet teneret terram pro termino vitae willeth that he should have and hold the Land for terme of his life this is adjudged by the word volo to be a good confirmation for life Coke com f. 301. b. Though it were stronger to say those words are void because they are not proper words of confirmation So if the Disseisor granteth a rent to the Disseisee and he by his Deed granteth it over and after doth re-enter in this case one and the same words doe amount to a grant and a confirmation So if the Disseisor maketh a Lease for life or in taile the remainder to the Disseisse in fee and the Disseissor by his Deed granteth over the remainder and the particular tenant atturneth the Disseissee shall not enter upon the tenant for life or in taile for then he should avoid his own grant which amounteth to a grant of the estates and a confirmation also ne pereat Coke ibidem 302. So if A enfeoffeth another upon condition that he and his heires shall render to a stranger and his heires a yearely rent of twenty shillings although this reservation be meerly void for that no estate moveth from the stranger and that he is not party to the Deed and therefore can be no rent yet shall it be taken for a penalty or for an annuall summ in grosse so as if they will not pay it according to the forme of the Indenture they shall loose the Land by the entry of the Feoffor and his heires which is to be observed that
the day of payment make his Executors and 〈…〉 dye and the heire enter into the Land as he ought c. the Feoffor ought to pay the monies to the Executor because the Executors as he saith l. 5. f. 99. a. represent the person of the Testator for all Goods and Chattels but if the condition upon the Mortgage be to pay the Mortgagee or his heires the mony c. and before the day of payment the Mortgagee dyeth the Feoffor cannot pay the mony to the Mortgagee but the payment ought to be made to the heire for expressum c. and the Law shall never seek out a person when the parties themselves have appointed one for designatio unius est exclusio alterius the appointment of one is the exclusion of the other But if the condition be to pay the mony to the Feoffee his Heires or Executors then the Feoffor hath election to pay it either to the Heire or Executor Coke com ibidem It is a sure ground in the Law expressum facit cessare tacitum Davis 45. in the case of Tenures and therefore the expresse reservation in Letters Patents excluded the reservations and implication in Law as if the King in his Letters Patents reserveth no tenure it shall be a capite tenure but if another tenure be expressed that shall prevaile as Coke l. 6. f. 6. where in a Patent the words of the Tenendum were Tenendum de nobis per servittum unius rosae pro omnibus servitij and wheras it was objected that no tenure can be without fealty yet in this case fealty that is an incident to all services shall be admitted to stand with the words and that then the tenure so expresly reserved was so compleate that it might well exclude the Knights service tenure which otherwise the Law would have implyed Davis Ibidem where it was also resolved that although the expresse tenure be void yet no tenure by implication of Law shall arise against the expresse tenure of reservation And so in the case of a void Habendum which standeth upon the same reason it was adjudged in B.R. between Higs and Crosse 33 and 34 Eliz. which in Bucklers case is cited by Coke l. 2. f. 55. Tenant for life maketh a Lease for years and after granteth the reversion to A. Habendum from a day to come for life after the day the Lessor for years atturneth in that case the Habendum is void and that void Habendum maketh void the whole Grant and excluded the implication of Law in the Premisses and no Estate shall pass by implication of Law in the Premisses against the express limitation of the partie in the Habendum Davis ibidem A man maketh a Lease rendring rent and doth not say to whom the rent shall be paid this by implication shall be to the Lessor and his Heirs But if the words be to the Lessor the Heir shall not have it Dyer 45. 12 Eliz. 3. c. So as an Estate by implication shall be controlled by an express limitation But if I grant to another a rent which I have in fee the grant shall be for life but if I say further Habendum after the death of I. S. there all shall be void Ployd 52.156 So if the King granteth lands by Letters Patens Habendum from a day to come there the whole grant is made void by the Habendum coke l. 5. f. 93. Barwicks case He in the reversion for life gtanteth his Estate Habendum after Michaelmas and after Michaelmas the Tenant attornes yet resolved the grant is void though if there had been no Habendum it had been good by the Premisses of the Deed coke f. 2. c. 55. Davis f. 26.27 Coke l. 7 f. 41. b If the Father by Deed indented in consideration of a hundred pounds paid by his son covenanteth to be seised to the use of his son there no use shall be raised to the son if the Deed be enrolled by the statute of 26 H 8. c. 10. for that it is in the nature of a bargain and sale and that which is expressed shall cause that which is implied to cease ibid. Coke l. 4. f. 8. a. in Nokes case It was resolved by the whole Court that an express Covenant doth qualifie the generality of the Covenant in Law and restraineth it by the mutuall assent of both parties which shall extend to no further then the express Covenant Quia clausula generalis non refertur ad expressa because a generall clause implyed in Law hath no reference to an express and particular Covenant in deed Yet Quadam tacita habentur pro expressis As if the Father Tenant by Knights-service enfeoff his son and heir within age it is not necessary to aver by collusion for it is apparant Ployd Winbichs case and 27 H. 8. Dacres case 33 H. 6. 14 c. So if I covenant to stand seised to the use of my Wife Son or Cosin that shall well raise a use without any express words of consideration for sufficient consideration appeareth because paternall love and affection appear If in a Lease the express Covenant is that the Lessee and his Executors shall repaire the house demised This shall not excuse the Assignee who by an implyed Covenant in Law adherent to the Estate is tied to repair it Coke l. A Warranty in Law is not distroyed by an express Warranty as if a man lease for life rendring rent and further bindeth himself and heirs to Warranty there the express Warranty shall not take the Warranty in Law but he may choose which he pleaseth Coke l. 4. f. 81. a. vide ibidem plura Lex neminem cogit ad impossibilia Coke com f. 231. b. l. 5. f. 75. a. The Law compelleth no man to impossibility If a Deed remain in one Court it may be pleaded in another Court without shewing forth for the Law doth not compell any one to impossibilities ibidem If a Lease be made upon condition that the Lessee dwell upon the lands demised the lease being for forty years and he dieth at the end of ten years yet the Executor shall enjoy the land because the condition is become impossible Et nemo tenetur ad impossibilia Dod. No man is bound to impossibilities 37 38 Eliz. If a man make a Lease for years of woods and it is covenanted that the Lessee shall leave the woods in as good plight as it was at the time of the Lease made and during the term the woods fell down by suddain tempest the Lessor shall not have an action of Covenant because it is impossible the Lessee shall perform it Perk. f. 142. b. Coke l. 1. f. 98. a. Coke com f. 206. a. If the condition of a Bond be impossible at the time of making the Condition the Condition is void because impossible and the Bond good As if a man be bound in an Obligation c. with Condition that if the Obligor doth go from the Church of S. Peter
the poor and the twenty pounds to the Queen and therefore doth the Statute of 3 Jac. c. 4. give a more speedy remedy for the said twelve pence yet shall they not be punished but upon one of them Yet when the latter affirmative Statute is contrary to the precedent Statute in matter the former abrogateth the latter as by the Statute of 33 H 8. c. 23 it is enacted that if any person being examined before the Councell of the King or three of them shall confess any Treason misprision of Treason or Murther or be to them vehemently suspected he shall be tried in any County where the King pleaseth by his Commission and after by the Statute of 1 2 P. M. c. 10. it was enacted That all trialls hereafter to be had for any Treason shall be had according to the course of the Common Law and not otherwise That latter act and though the latter words had not been had abrogated the first because they were contrary in matter But that doth not abrogate the Statute of 34 H. 8. c 2. of the triall of Treasons beyond the Seas notwithstanding the words are in the negative because it was not contrary in matter for it was not triable by the Common Law Dyer 132. Stanf. 89. 90. So the Statute of 1 E. 6. of Chanteries being in the affirmative doth alter the Statute of H. 2. c. 41. which giveth a Cessavit cantaria also in the affirmative for the one is contrary to the other in matter vide plura Coke l. 9. f. 63. a. But whensoever Lawes are contrary in quality that is where the first is a materiall or express affirmative and the latter an express or materiall negative and when the first is a materiall or express negative and latter affirmative there the latter Law doth abrogate the former As the Statute of 5 E. c 4. which prohibiteth every person to use or exercise any craft mystery or occupation unless he hath been an Apprentice for seven years doth alter the Common Law by which any one may in any manner worke in any lawfull Trade without any service precedent for without an Act of Parliament no man can be restrained to worke in any Trade Coke l 11. f. 54. a. in the Taylors of Ipsiches case And to conclude to this Argument with the generall ground given by Sir Edward Coke l. 1. 11. f. 67. a. That for that Acts of Parliament are established with such gravity and wisdome and the universall consent of all the Realme they ought not through any strained construction out of the generall and ambiguous words of a subsequent Act be abrogated as where the Statute of 16. R 23 c. 5. enacteth that all the Lands and Tenements of any one attainted in a Praemunire shall be forfeited to the King in the case of one Prudgion Pasch 21. Eliz. being tenant in taile of certaine Lands and Tenements who was attainted of a Praemunire the question before all the Judges of England was whether the estate taile was a bar or no and it was resolved by all the Justices that those generall words had not repealed the Statute de donis conditionalibus but that onely he shall forfeite them for his life and that the issue in taile should inherit vide ibidem plura Lex non patetur fractiones divisiones Statuum Coke l. 1. f 87. a. The Law will not suffer fractions and divisions of estates As if a man make a lease for life upon condition that if he doth not pay twenty pounds that another shall have the Land that future limitation is void Ployd f. 25. c. M. 18. H. 8. 3. And if after the Statute of 1. R. 3. before the Statute of 27. H. 8. A man had made a Feoffment to the use of one for life or in taile and after to the use of another for life or en-taile and after to the use of another in fee they in the Remainder might not make a Feoffment nor grant their estates by the generall words of that act for then there should be a fraction and division of estates which the Law will not suffer vide ibidem plura in Corbets case Coke l. 3. f. 32. b. If a man be seised of a Mannor to which a Leet waife or stray or any other hereditament which is not of any annuall value is appendant or appurtenant there by a devise of the Mannor with the appurtenances those shall passe as incidents to the Mannor for in that the Statute enableth him by expresse words to devise the Mannor by consequence it enableth him to devise the Mannor with all incidents and appendants to it and it was never the meaning or the intention of the makers of the Statute that when the Devisor hath power to devise the principall that he shall not have power to devise it that was incident and appendant to it but that the Mannor c. shall be dismembred and fractions made of things which by legall prescription have been united and annexed together Ibidem for the Law will not permit such factions in Estates Coke com f. 147. b. If a man hath a rent-charge issuing out of certaine Land and he purchaseth any part of the Land to him and his heires the whole rent-charge is extinct because the rent is entire and against common right and issuing out of every part of the Land and therefore by purchase of part is extinct in the whole and cannot be apportioned Coke com 309. b. If the reversion be granted of three acres and the Lessee agree to the said grant for one acre this is good for all three and so it is of an Attornement in Law if the reversion of three acres be granted and the Lessee surrender one of the Acres to the Grantee this Attornement shall be good for the whole Reversion of the three Acres according to the grant Apices juris non sunt jura Coke com f. 2 83. b. nimia subtilitas reprobatur in Lege Coke l. 4. 4â— b. The Law of England respecteth the effect and substance of the matter and not every nicity of forme or circumstance and too much subtility is reproved in the Law As it was alledged for an exception in the Enditement that the Enditement was taken before I. S. Coronatore in comitatu praedicto and not de comitatu praedicto or comitatus praedicti and every Coroner of one County is a Coroner in every County of England but not of every County but it was not allowed for the Coroner in the County c. shall in all reasonable intendement be taken for the Coroner of the County and so it is used in the Writ de coronatore elegendo ibidem vide plura Coke l. 5. f. 120. 122. It is a rule in Law that Enditements ought to be certaine but there are three manner of certainties the first is to a common intent and that sufficeth in Bars which are to defend the party and excuse him the second is to a generall
deteriorem nequaquam Cok. Com. 141. a. The Church exerciseth the Office of a minor can make its condition better but not worse for it is the cheifest reason which makes for Religion And therefore in all cases a Parson or Vicar of the Church for the benefit of the Church hath a qualified fee but in many cases to doe any thing to the prejudice of the Church he hath in effect but an estate for life As a Parson Vicar c. may have an action of Waste and in the Writ it shall be said ad exheredationem Ecclesiae So the Parson that maketh a Lease for Life shall have a consimili casu during the life of the Leasee and a Writ of Entry ad communem legem after or a Writ ad terminum qui preterijt or a quod permittat in the debet which no man can maintaine but Tenant in Fee-simple or Fee-tayle vide But a Parson cannot make a discontinuance for that should be to the prejudice of his Successor to take away his Entry and drive him to a reall action but if he dye the Successor may enter notwithstanding the discontinuance And if a Parson make a Lease for years reserving rent and dyeth the Lease is determined neither will the acceptance of the Successor make it good vide 5. Prelatus Ecclesiae suae conditionem meliorem facore potest sine consensu deteriorem vero nequaquam sine consensu Coke Com. fol. 103. a. As neither Bishop nor Parson cannot disclaim or devest any fee is invested in his house or Church But an Abbot or a Prior with his Covent or a Bishop with his Chapter or a Parson with his Patron and Ordinary may passe away any Inheritance for the wisdome of the Law would not trust one with the Inheritance of the Church which alwayes maketh for religion and the good of the Church 6. Dies dominicus non est dies juridicus Ployd 265. The Sabbath day is no day for Law As upon a Fine levyed by Proclamations according to the Statute of 4. H. 7. C. 24. If any of the Proclamations be made on the Sabbath day all the Proclamations be erronious for the Justices must not sit upon that day but it is a day exempted from such Businesses by the Common-Law for the Solempnity of it to the intent that the people may apply themselves that day to the service of God No Plea shall be holden Quindena Pasche because it is alwayes the Sabbath but shall be Crastino quindenae Pasch Fit Nat. fo 17. f. Upon a Scire facias out of the Common Bench an Error was assigned because the Teste of the Scire facias was upon a Sunday And it was adjudged Error because it was not Dies Juâ—idicus Dyer 168. No sale upon a Sunday shall be said to be sale in a Market overt to alter the property 12 E. 4 8. Although Sunday is not Dies Ju idicus and that no judiciall Act ought to be acted on that day yet ministeriall Acts as to arrest or serve Process are allowed for otherwise peradventure they should never be executed and God forbid that things of necessity should not be done on that day for bonum est bene facere die Sabathi but this distinction and exception is taken away by a late Act made in the long Parliament of England yet did that Parliament in case of necessity once sit upon the Lords day which is the high Court of Justice and from which there is no appeale By the Statute of Magna Charta Cap. 14. no spirituall Parson shall be amerced according to his spirituall benefice but according to his Lay fee Fitz. Nat. br f. 76. b. And that in favour of Religion 7. Omnia quae movent ad mortem sunt deod inda Coke l. 5. fol. 110. b. any unreasonable thing killing a man by misadventure is forfeited to the King and every thing moveing with it is forfeited also to the King As if a man being upon a Cart carrying Faggots and as he is in binding them together falleth downe by the motion of one of his Horses in the Cart and dyeth of that both that and all the Horses in the Cart and the Cart it selfe are forfeited 8. E. 2. 307. A man falleth from a stack of Corne and dyeth it is forfeited 2. E. 3 140. If any Horse strike one and I â—lien my Horse and he dyeth my Horse is forfeited because the forfeiture shall have relation to the stroke given Ployd 260. b. Kâ—llaway 68. b. but it is not forfeited untill the matter be found on record and therfore it cannot be by prescription and the Jurors that find the death must also finde and apprize the goods Coke l. 5. fol. 11. b. And therefore are they called Deodands quasi deodanda that is Elâ—emosynas eroganda to be disposed in Almes and workes of Charity 17. E 4. 2. and for that reason doth the King grant them to his Almoner to the intent they should be disposed of by him accordingly Actus dei nemini facit injuâ—iam Cok. Com fol. 148 So much is the reason of the Law ruled by Religion as it will not permit the Act of God to prejudice any one as if Tenant for another mans life granteth a Rent-charge to one for one and twenty years cesty que vie dyeth the Rent-charge is determined and yet the Grantee during the years may have a Writ of Annuity for the Arrearages incurred after the death of cesty que vie because it determined by the Act of God Cok. lâ—b 8. fol. 72. Hales Case An Office is found that the Heir is in ward who after he was of ful age tendreth his Livery and was admitted to it the Heir within three moneths which is the usuall time to sue out his Livery bargaineth part of his Lands by Deed inrolled and within the three moneths dyeth the bargaine was adjudged good and that the Heire should have no prejudice because the suing of his homage and suing out of his Livery without default in him was become impossible by the Act of God Impotentia excusat lâ—gem and is all one as if the King had taken the Homage of the Heire when the Heire made his tender vide ibidem pâ—uâ—a Coke lib. 8. fo 63 a. If an House fall by tempest or other Act of Gâ—d the Lessee for life or years hath a speciall interest to take Timber for the builâ—ing of the house againe if he will for his habitation but if he pull downe the house he shall not have Timber to builde it because it is his own Act and the Lessor shall have an Action of Waste Coke lib. 1. 98. a. If a Lessee Covenanteth to leave the Wood in as good plight as it was at the time of the Lease and after the Trees are subverted by Tempest he is dischar ed of his Covenant causa qua supra Cok. l. 5. fol. 86. a. Bâ—unfeilds Case If the Defendant in debt dyeth in Execution the Plaintiff shall have a new
to deliver the Evidences of the Land it shall be understood of the first Iohanes S. the vendor who by common intendment hath the Evidences so a man granteth to one a pention that I. B. had donec sibi provisum fuerit de competenti beneficio this word sibi shall be referred to the grantee and not to I. B. so in a cui vita brought by a Feme the Writ is cui ipsa in vita contradicere non potest the word shall not be referred to the next antecedent ipsa but to the husband otherwise the sense should be imperfect Dyer Ibidem f. 15. b. So Dyer f. 46. b. I. G. was indited before the Coronor of the death of Emelin Gager his wife and the Inditement was that the said Emelin was in pace domini regis quousque ante dictus Iohanes Gager vir prefate Emelin Gager de Hambridge predicta in commitatu predicto Yeoman and the Inditement was held good and that there was no defect in the addition for the word Yeoman could not bee addition to the Feme though the next antecedent but must necessarily be referred to the husband according to the sense and meaning A Writ brought of rescuing goods and denying to pay towle contra pacem shall bee referred to the rescouse and not to the towle 30. E. 3. 15. because in it consisted the breach of the peace Coke l. 8. f. 119. Adam de Clidrow brought a precipe against Iohn de Clidrow and the Writ was quod juste c. reddat manerium de Wincomb duas carrucatas terre cum pertinentiis in Clidrow in this case the Village of Clidrow shall not relate to the Mannor because it wanteth not it for a Mannor may be demanded without mention made that it lyeth in any Village but cum pertinentiis though it come after the Village relateth to the Mannor because it wanteth it Quia verba posteriora propter certitudinem addita ad priora quae certitudine indigent sunt referenda 6. E. 3. 12. Impersonalitas non concludit nec ligat Cok. com 352. b impersonals doe not conclude or binde and therefore every estopple ought to bee a precise affirmation of that which maketh the estopple and not to be spoken impersonally as if it bee said ut dicitur because impersonality doth not conclude any man for impersonalitas dicitur quasi sine parsona ibidem Negatio destruit negationem ambo faciunt affirmationem Coke Com. f. 146. b. according to Grammaticall construction a double negative maketh an affirmative a distresse was pro infecto servicio the Defendant saith quod non fuit infectum and ruled as good as if he had said it was done but Grammaticall curiosity shall not prevaile in like cases to avoide a Grant as upon a Rent charge issuing out of Land the Proviso was quod non presens scriptum nec aliquid in eo specificatum non aliqualiter se extendat ad onerandam personam meam Nec non in Grammatical construction doth make an affirmation but the Law that principally respecteth the substance doth judge the Proviso to be a negative according to the intent of the parties so as the sense of those words according to the construction of the Law is provided that this present writing nor any thing therein specified shall any way extend to charge my person Coke Com. f. 146. a. b. so ibidem f. 223. b. If Lands bee given in taile sub conditione quod ipse nec heredes sui non alienarent that he nor his heires shall not alien in legall construction shall bee taken negatively notwithstanding the double negative In disjunctivis sufficit alterum esse verum Coke lib. 10. f. 59. a. The Bishop of Sarums case whereas the avowant did avow that the Office supervisoris omnium maneriorum suorum had been granted to such person or persons as it pleased the Bishop and the Defendant pleaded in the negative that the said office had not been granted but for the life of one that exception was not allowed because in that the advowant did not alledg that the said office had been granted to diverse but onely to such person or persons and in disjunctives it is sufficient that one of them be true ibidem So Coke Com. f. 225. a If the condition bee in the disjunctive it is sufficient to obey either of them according to the rule Si plures conditiones ascriptae fuâ—rint donationi divisim cuilibet vel alteri eorum satis est obtemperare in disjunctivis sufficit alterum esse verum If many coditions bee annexed to a guift severally or disjunctively it is sufficient to obey every one or any one in disjunctives it is sufficient if either of them be true Si plures conditiones ascriptae sunt donationi conjunctim omnibus est parendum ad veritatem copulatiâ—vam requiritur quod utraque pars sit vera Bracton lib. 2 f. 19 Coke com f. 225. a. If many conditions be joyntly annexed to a gift all of them must be obeyed and to a copulative truth it is required that every part be true in a condition consisting of diverse parts in the conjunctive both parts must bee performed as if a man give Lands in taile upon condition that if Tenant in Taile or his heires alien in fee or in taile c. and also if all the issues comming of tenant in taile bee dead without issue that then it shall bee lawfull for the Donor and his heires to enter if tenant in taile in this case or his heires make any discontinuance he in the reversion and his heires may enter after the estate taile is determined for want of issue for the reason abovesaid But if the condition or limitation bee both in the conjunctive and disjunctive what then as a Lease to the husband and wife for 21 yeares if the husband wife or any child betweene them shall so long live and the wife dieth without issue the Lease shall continue during the life of the husband for the disjunctive referreth to the whole and disjoyneth not onely the latter part as to the child but also to the Baron and feme And so it is that if an use be limitted to certaine persons until A. shall come from beyond the Seas and attain to his ful age or die if he doe come from beyond the Seas or attaine to his full age the use doth cease Coke ibidem f. 225. e. Grammatica falsa non vitiat instrumentum Reg. I.C. decius 3. f. 10. mala grammatica non vitiat cartam sensus abreviationis accipiendus est ut concessio non sit inanis Coke l. 9. f. 48. a. false latine doth not destroy a Deed or a Charter and the sense of dashes or abreviations is so to bee taken that the grant be not voide as if the King grant tat il mannur of C. and D. and in truth there is but one Mannor then those abreviations shall bee taken in the singular number totum illud
manerium and if there bee two distinct Mannors then shall they bee taken in the plurall number tota illa maneria that the grant be not void and 32. E. 3. A Fine was levied de maneriis B. and H. and the conclusion was quare praedictum manerium B. and H. ingressus est and good by averment that B. and H. were but one Mannor and though a Writ shall abate for false Latine because any one may purchase a new Writ at his pleasure yet in a grant it shall not because hee cannot purchase a new grant at his pleasure As 4. H. 6 f. 16. the Writ was Henricus dei gratia Rex Angliae Dus Heberniae whereas it should have beene Dns and for it in congruity the Writ did abate but in a Deed that should have beene good enough and so in a fine 9. E. 3. warranty was made in a fine eidem galfrido uxori suae where that should have been iisdem and yet good vide ibidem plura Co. l. 11. f. 3. and Coke com f. 146. ab but because such exceptions doe properly appertaine to Writs Deeds and Fines which have heretofore been composed and levied in the Latine tongue and that by the Act of 9. April 1651. it is enacted that all Patents commissions and all proceedings whatsoever in any Courts of Justice within the Common-wealth of England and which concerne the Law and administration of Justice be made and framed into the english tongue I will cease to heape more cases upon this rule they being chiefly in use for preterite Deeds conveyances and proceedings though not altogether uselesse in our English language for it also hath its grammaticall constructions and sometimes abreviations and therefore it is also in the above said Act enacted that mistranslations or variation in forme by reason of Translation or part of proceedings already begun being in Latine or part in English shall bee no error or avoide any proceedings by reason thereof Sect. 3. THe Law hath little relat ionto Rhetorick and is too strict an argumentative for that copious various and tropicall art Ornari res ipsa negat contenta doceri Doctum genus in doctorum hominum ad doceberniam vix docti But like ruggid and knotty tymber rejects the rhetoricall plaine and outward ornament which moved the critticke Erasmus to deride it and the civilian Hottaman to despise it not apprehending the depth and profundity of it for the Law as Sir Edward Coke is a deep well out of which every one drawes according to the strength of his understanding Cok. com f. 7.1 a. he which reacheth deepest seeth the admirable secrets of the Law which though in the beginning it seemeth difficult yet when the student diveth to the depth it is delightfull and therefore as the same Author in another place saith The generous student Cok. com f. 5. a. ought not to bee discouraged when he meeteth with knotty cases nescit enim generosa mens ignorantiam pati but will proceed on his reading with alacrity to know how to worke into with delight those ruffe Mines of hidden Treasure Coke com f. 235. to which worke as he also saith the knowledge of the liberall arts is requisite especially the art of Logick to labour in that various and intricate Labyrinth for it teacheth a man not onely by just argument to conclude the matter in question but to discover between truth and falsehood and to use a good method and reasonably to speake to any question for it is nothing else but ars rationandi the act of reasoning Coke com f. 344. h. and then wee are said to know the law when wee apprehend the reason of the law from whence arise these grounds and maxims and first from notations which by the consent of all Writers appertaine to Logick Notationes sunt quasi verae rerum notae Fons log and Bracton L. 4. c. 20. Ideo imposita sunt nomina ut demonstrent voluntatem dicentis utimur notis vocis ministerio notations are as it were the true notes of things sor therefore were they imposed that they might demonstrate the will of the speaker and wee use them as notes in the ministry of our Language as Socage is servitium socae i.e. carucae the service of the Plow because that the word soca was used for the Plow and the name of the court of Pypowders was derived from the dusty feet of the commers markets and faires being most frequented in Summer Lam. Arch. so religious houses were called monasteria of the solitarie life therein led which in latter daies was nothing lesse quia as one pleraque monasteria nihil minus sunt quam solitudines Dod. so the feudists in the civill law deduce homagium from hominium for by that name hee doth professe himselfe his man and Client And such notations and etymologies are not to be wrested but must bee answerable to the sound of the words and applied to the sense of which it is said by Coke com f. 68. b. that the right interpretations and etymologies of words are necessary which not only demonstrate their native conceptions but from them often produced arguments which are frequent among the Civilians as well as by the common Lawyers as Cicero arguing for Opimius then Consul useth this notation si Consul est qui consulit patria quid alius est Opimius Ployden 343 b. Testamentum est testatio mentis for of those two words is it compounded and there is no other testation of the Testators mind here but for the twelve Acres in Rigdens case So Cok l. 8. 37. a. a Barrator is derived of two legall words bar which signifieth the bar in Court where causes are debated and retium which signifieth a crime and offence because a common barrator is chiefely an offendor in moving and maintaining of quarrels at barres in Courts and Coke l. 10. f. 128. a. reditus dicitur a reddendo quia retro it to wit to the Lessor or Donor and that is the reason that the Rent so reserved is not due before the day of payment because it is to be rendred and restored of the issues and profits vide Yet as Doderidge such arguments are not to be used at all times and occasions but when necessity requireth the same or apt consequence doth offer a fit occasion or rather as Coke l. 7. f. 27. b. Calvins Case Arguments drawn from Etymologys are too weake or too light for Judges to build there Judgments on yet when they agree with the Judgment of the Law Judges may use them for Ornaments From the Predicable GEnerale nihil ponit generale nihil certum implicat Cok. l. 2. f. 33.34 in Doddingtons Case a generality determineth nothing and a generality implyeth no certainty as if a common person be bound to devise or grant all his Lands which he hath within the tenure of I. B. in W. the Obligor may say that he hath no Land there for
proferentem accipienda sunt Bacon Eliz. f. 11. As if I demise omnes boscos meos in villa de Dale for years this passeth the soile 14. H. 8.28 H. 8. Dyer 17. And if I sowe my Land with Corne and let it for for yeares the Corne passeth to my Lessee And if I grant ten pounds rent to Baron and Feme and if the Baron dye the Feme shall have three pounds rent because these words rest ambiguous whether I intend three pounds by way of addition or three pounds by way of deduction out of the rent of ten pounds it shall be taken strongest against me that it is three pounds addition to the ten pound of which more hereafter So Coke fol. 303. b. Ambiguum placitum interpretari debet contra proferentem An ambiguous Plea shall be taken strongest against the pleader for every one is presumed to make the best of his own Case and Coke l. 10. f. 50. Ambigua responfio contra proferentem est accipienda the Bishop of Sarums Case vide ibidem In obscuris secundum magis similius est judicandum vel quod plerumque inspici solet Regula I. C. and Coke l. 4.13 14. Sensus verborum ex causa dicendi accipiendus est sermones semper accipiendi secundum subjectam materiam In obscure and dark sayings we are to judge according to that which is most likely and which is wont to be and the sense of the words is to be collected from the cause of the speech and to be taken according to the subject of the matter which rule seemeth to qualify and moderate the other two vide ibidem S. Cromwells Case as first in words the Plaintiff bringeth an action upon the case for calling of him Murderer to which the Defendant said that as he was speaking with the Plaintiff concerning unlawfull hunting the Plaintiff confessed that he had killed diverse Hares with Engins to which the Defendant answered that he was a murtherer innuendo a murtherer of Hares and it was resolved that the justification was good for upon an action of slander the likeliest sense of words is to be taken and collected out of the occasion of the speech Coke ibidem And so in Deeds as if I have a free Warren in my land and let my Land for life not mentioning the Warren yet the Lessee by implication shall have the Warren 32. H. 6. which is the more likely meaning for otherwise the Lessor would have excepted the Warren Vnivocum denoteth words of a certaine and distinct signification and expresseth the thing cleerly without any obscurity or Ambiguity of which the Law taketh especiall notice for that certainty in all contracts and conveyances is the cause of quiet and setlement of estates but incertainty is the author of variance and dissention from whence we have these notable grounds and maximes Misera est servitus ubi jus est vagum Coke l. 5. f. 42. a. God forbid that the inheritances of men should depend upon incertaines and it is a miserable servitude where the Law is wavering and therefore Ployd f. 28. a. In every Common-wealth it is necessary and requisite that things should bee certainely conveyed for certainty engendreth repose and incertainty contention The occasions of which contention our Law foreseeing hath prevented and therefore ordained that certaine ceremonies should be used in the transmutation of things from one man to another and namely of Frank-tenements which are of greatest estimation in our lawes to know the certaine times when things do passe and therefore in every Feoffment the Law ordeineth that livery and seisin shall bee made and in every grant of a reversion or rents that attornement should be made which are points certaine containing time wherefore it is well observed by Sir Edward Coke in his Preface to the second part of his Reports that in all his time there have not beene moved in the Courts of Justice of England two questions touching the rights of descent escheats or the like fundamentall points of the common-Law so certaine sure and without question are the principles and grounds thereof That as Sir John Davis in his preface there is no art nor science which standeth upon discourse and reason which hath her Rules and Maxims so certaine and infallible and so little subject to diverse interpretations as the common Law of England Whence Sir Edw. Coke is bold to pronounce that the Common Law of England is not incertaine in the abstract but in the concrete and that the incertainty thereof is hominis vitium non professionis the imperfection of man and not of the profession and lib. 6. f. 43. a. in particular blameth hee the subtile inventions imaginations of men in the practise of uses which have introduced many mischiefs inconveniences contrary to the ancient common law which hath certain rules to direct the estates and inheritances of men and therefore is it without comparison better to have Estates and Inheritances directed by the certaine rule of the common Law which harh beene the ancient true and faithfull servant to this Common-wealth then by incertaine imaginations and conjectures of any of those new inventors of uses without any approved ground of law or reason Coke l. 6. f. 43. a. And therefore in all cases law and equity will that incertainty bee avoided as the author of contention and that there bee an end of all controversies according to equity and right which is the finall intention of all Lawes Coke l. 8. 53. And Coke l. 1. f. 85. a. The Judges ought to know the intention of the parties by certaine and sensible words which are agreeable and consonant to the rules of Law as if Land bee given by deed to two to have and to hold to them and haeredibus it is void for the insensibility and incertainty and though it hath a clause of warranty to them and their heires that shall not make the first wordes which are incertaine and insensible to bee of force and effect in Law although his intent appeareth but his intent ought to bee declared by words certain and consonant to Law So Coke comment f. 20. b. If a man letteth Lands to A. for life the remainder to B. in taile the remainder to C. in forma praedicta the remainder is void for the incertainty And therefore Ployd f. 272. a. giveth this ground that every contract sufficient to make a Lease for yeares ought to have certainty in three limitations in the beginning of the terme in the continuance and in the end of the same all which ought to be known at the beginning of the Lease and the Lease that wanteth them Mr. Brown said is but bibble babble vide ibidem Fullers case and Coke l. 6. f. 35. the Bishop of Bathes case Ployd f. 14. a. If I give all my mony in my purse to I. S. hee cannot have an action for it unlesse hee alledge the certainty of it so as without certainety the action is not maintainable according to
the rule given by Bracton incertae rei nulla est donatio l. 5. c. 4. Ployd f. 273. b. If a Lease bee made untill I. S. who hath execution of a Statute Marchant is satisfied of the duty for which hee hath sued execution this is not a good Lease and shall not bee called a terme for yeares for it is not certaine how long the Lease shall endure either for six years or for twelve yeares so there is an incertainty of time at the end of the Lease for a terme containeth certainty So if a Lease bee made from three yeares to three yeares and so from three yeares to three yeares duering the life of I. S. it shall bee but a Lease for six yeares for for six yeares there is certainty and when he saith and so from three yeares to three yeares it is all one as if hee had said the first three yeares during the other three yeares which containeth certainty but when hee goeth further and saith and so from three yeares to three yeares for the life of I. S. that containeth no certainty in it for it is incertaine how many three yeares I. S. shall live so that in the beginning the end is not knowne of the number of yeares intended which is contrary to the nature of a Lease for yeares Coke comm f. 45. b. and Browne and Dier said it had beene so adjudged vid. ibid. Ployd saies and Fullers case So if a parson maketh a lease of his glebe for so many yeares as he shall be parson there this cannot be made certaine by any meanes for nothing is more uncertain then the time of his death terminus vitae incertus est quanquam nihil est certius ipsa morte nihil tamen incertius est hora mortis Coke com 45. b. A grant to I. S or I. N is void for the incertainty and if it bee delivered to I. S. the delivery of the deed will not make a voide grant good 11. H. 7. 13. Noy Max. f. 67. Coke com f. 310. b. If a reversion be granted for life and after it is granted to the same grantee for yeares aâ—â—â—he Lessee attorne to both grants they are void for the incertainty So if the Lord by Deed granteth his signiory to I. Bishop of London and his heires and by another Deed to I. Bishop of London and his Successors and the Tenant attorneth to both grants the attornment is void for both grants for albeit the grant bee but to one yet hee hath severall capatities and the grants are severall and the attornment is not according to either of the grants ibidem A gift made to one of the Infants of I. S. is void for the incertainty 11. E. 41. and Dier f. 91. A grant is made for so many trees as may bee reasonably spared it is void for the incertainty for who shall bee judge of the sparing the Vendor or the Vendee and it seemeth that neither of them yet by common intendment the Vendor hath most knowledge which may bee spared So if I bargaine with you that I give you for your Land so much as it is reasonably worth it is voide for default of certainty So a grant seniori dignissimo filio is void for the incertainty for some will say that he who is most learned and knowing is the most worthy man and some will say the most valiant man and some the most liberall man and so the multitude can never agree Scinditur incertum studia â—â—ontraria vulgus And by that the most potent man was alwaies preferred which is contrary to all Lawes inde datae leges ne fortior omnia possit Dav. l. 33.36 case of Tanistry vide Coke com So a release doth not discharge Bayle before judgement because it is contingent and incertaine Coke l. 5. Samons case B. in consideration of six l. assumes to pay twenty pound to A. If hee doe not performe the award of I. S. which was that hee should enter in obligation to A. that A. and his wife should enjoy the Lands were in controversie between them B. would not enter into obligation and it was adjudged the award was voide for the incertainty because it doth not appeare of what summe the obligation should be for the Arbitrators are Judges and their award must be certaine to decide the controversie Certum est quod certum reddi potest Coke com f. 43. b. Though it be Bractons rule Terminus annorum debet esse certus determinatus as in every lease for years the terme must have a certaine beginning and a certaine ending yet allbeit there appeare no certainty of yeares in the Lease if by reference to a certainty it may be made certaine it sufficeth for that is certaine which may be made certaine As if A. leaseth his Lands to B. for so many yeares as B. hath in the Mannor of Dale and B. hath then in the said Mannor a terme for ten yeares this is a good Lease to B. for ten yeares If a man make a Lease to I. N. for so many yeares as I. N. shall name this at the beginning is incertaine but when I. N. hath named yeares then is it a good Lease for so many yeares Ployd f. 273. b. For it is my demise and my contentment that hee name the yeares which by my reference to his nomination is as much as if I my selfe had named But if a Lease bee made for so many yeares as my Executors shall name and then I die and my Exâ—â—â—â—s name the yeares the Lease shall not bee good because they neither did nor could name the yeares during my life ibidem So if I make a Lease untill I. S. who is in Prison for hunting shall be in Prison for it by order of Law that is all one as if hee had made the Lease for two yeares for by the statute of W. 1. c. 10. hee shall bee imprisoned so long so if I make a Lease for yeares rendring five pound rent by the yeare and then I grant the rent and reversion to another untill hee hath received of the rent twenty pound that is all one as if I had granted the reversion for four yeares and therefore the Lease containeth such certainty of time by the reference So if a Lease bee made during the nonage of I. S. who is of the age of fifteen yeares it is a Lease for six yeares if I. S. live so long for the reference to the time certaine is as much as if hee had expressed the nomination of the time contained in the reference So if I make a Lease for ten yeares and so from ten yeares to ten yeares during a 100. yeares it is a good Lease Ployd ib. E. Coke l. 6. f. 20. The Bishop of Bathes case So a Lease for years after the Lessee shall make such an act is good so a Lease for twenty yeares if the coverture betweene I. S. and his wife continue so long although in one case it
that he had not white Acre by descent but had it by purchase for the relation to the descent was in vaine in that certainty appeared before ibidem vide Coke l. 3. Doughtys case f. 18. Oportet quod certae personae certae terrae certi status comprehendantur in declaratione usuum Coke l. 9. f. 9. a. Every declaration of uses upon Recoveries Fines c. of Lands Tenements and Hereditaments ought to be certaine for otherwise there shall be no certainty of inheritances and that certainty ought to be principally in three things in persons to whom in Lands c. of whom and in estate by whom uses shall be limited and declared and if certainty faile in any of them the declaration is insufficient Certa debet esse intentio narratio Bractton lib. 2. All declarations ought to be certaine so as the Defendant may know to what thing he ought to answer Ployd 84. a. As 3. E. 4. f. 21. A man retained in husbandry brings an action of debt against a Prioresse for his salary and declares that he was retained with her Predecessor and doth not shew what person retained him and by the better opinion the count shall abate for the incertainty for that it might be that one that had no Warrant retained him And so is it in a Writ Ployd ib. vi a. 22. E. 4. f. 47. It was granted by Parliament that Ashby should have a writ with Proclamations out of the Chancery against one Griffeth to answer for diverse Trespasses which were contained in the Act of Parliament and the Writ by award was abated because he made no mention of the Trespasses in certaine and there it varied from the Act but that was a private Act and therefore the non-recitall of it makes the Writ naught and so should the mis-recitall but the recitall of a generall act or the mis-recitall of a generall Act is not material but the Judges are bound to take notice of it without the monstrance of the party Oportet ut res certa deducatur in judicium Coke l. 5. f. 321. a. Playters Case P. brought an action of Trespasse against W. Quare clausum suum fregit pisces suos cepit without shewing the number or nature of the Fishes and it was resolved that the count should have comprehended the Fishes in certaine that the Defendant might have a certaine answer and upon which a certaine judgment might be given as 4. H. 6. n. the writ was quare piscem cepit and counts of so many Pikes in certaine and though the writ was piscem in the singular number yet good because per se est nomen collectivum in which the plurall number is comprehended and great inconvenience otherwise would ensue for unlesse the issue hath certainty with which the Jury may be charged upon such a generall incertainty if they give a false verdict they may be charged in attaint and f. 38. a. Teyes case In a fine the same thing was granted and surrendred to severall persons and of severall estates and so repugnant and erroneous for a fine is like unto a Judgment for a Scire facias lyes to execute it as of a Judgment and oportet as Bracton saith quod certa res deducatur in Judicium Ployd Manhells Case f. 10. b. If three issues bring three severall Formedonâ— he whose writ is first returned shall have the Land for by it he hath first attached the possession in the hands of the tenant and the writ is not of Record before the returne but if all the three Writs be returned on the same day they shall all abate because it is incertain by the count if the Tenant confesse the actions to whom they shall award seisin because all their titles are alike and all returned on the same day and for that incertainty the writs shall abate as 21. R. 2. Fit avowry p. l. 262. In a Replegiare against two the one avows for Damage-feasant and the other avows that he had common in the Land and tooke the beasts as a commoner Damage-feasant and by the award of the Court both the avowrie was abated and the Plaintiff recovered damages against them because every of them could not have the returne and who should be preferred and who rejected would be incertaine to the Court vide Ployd f. 84. a. b. Partridges case In some cases the count and the writ may be generall without certainty as in assizes but there the certainty must be shewen by the replication and in some cases the writ the count and the replication also may be incertaine but the certainty shall appeare by verdict As in a Quare impedit the value of the Church doth not appeare in the count nor in the replication but it shall appeare by verdict for they shal assess double damages or damages for halfe a yeare according to the value of the Church as the case requireth so in a writ of Ward the Jury shal find if the heir be married or not and shall assesse daâ—â—ges for it and yet in the count and replication no such matter appeareth So in a detinue the valew of the goods appeareth by verdict and in many other cases So as the certainty allwayes must appeare to the Court and if it be requisite to be shewen in the count then it ought not to be left out or omitted in the count as Ployd f. 85. a. In decies tantum he must shew the certainty of the sum received because he shall recover ten times more and that he cannot unlesse he shew how much it is And in Trespasse if the Defendant pleade that it is his Frank-tenement and the Plaintiff intitles himselfe by a lease for years made by him and if the Defendant will shew that he made a Feoffment and that he entered for the forfeiture he must shew the name of the Feoffees and certainty of the Feoffment for in all cases the privy ought to shew the certainty and in case of forfeiture the Lessor in the reversion is privy to it So if the heire will pleade in bar in a writ of Dower the detainer of evidences he must shew the certainty of the evidencies for he is privy to them in that he affirmeth that they appertaine to him but if he say a bag ensealed with Charters that is good without shewing the certainty of them 18. H. 8. f. 1. B. Dower And if one be bound in an obligation to serve I. S. for seven years in mandatis omnibus suis licitis he shal pretend that he did serve him lawfully without shewing in what service or in what commandement for no servant can remember all 20. E. 4.13 So a man may aver a thing to be done by Covin without shewing how the Covin was for Covin is a secret thing contrived between two or three to the prejudice of another 4. E. 6. 46. And a man may pleade that he was chosen Knight for the Shrie by the greatest number without shewing the number for the
election may be by voyces or hands or in othâ—â— sort and it is hard to discerne the certaine number and yet easy to see who had the greatest number 2. M. 128. vide Ployd f. 121. b. Coke Com. f. 303. c. Every Plea must be direct and not by way of argument or rehersall and an argumentative Plea is not good Ployd f. 122. a. b. for there is a ground in the Law that in declarations certainty ought to be alledged by apt words of affirmation otherwise the declaration is not good As in debt upon an obligation I declare that it appears by the obligation that the Defendant is bound to me in twenty pound the declaration is not good because it was alledged in matter of fact quod tenebatur mihi in twenty pound for bond is alledged for recitall onely So 11. H. 6. In an action of debt against a goaler who had let one at large who was in execution under guarde for the sum in demand and declareth that he let him at large by which the Plaintiff exclusus fuit de debito suo and the declaration not good because he did not say that he was not satisfied when he let him at large which is the cause of the action which he hath not alledged but by implication for by implication it is alledged for if he let him go at large by which he is barred of his debt against the prisoner by it is implyed that the debt was not then paid but the count was not good because it was not affirmed by precise words and 38. H. 6. f. 14. The Plaintiff in an action of debt counts that the Defendant retained him in his service for eight years to serve him in all occupations taking for every yeare 20 s. and the Defendant gageth his Law and though the Plaintiff was retained in husbandry and the service of husbandry was implyed in the words all occupations yet the Defendant was received to his Law because it was not fully expressed that he was retained in husbandry but onely by implication which would not suffice So Ployd f. 143. b. The Covenant in the Indenture was if one moyety of the Rent was behinde and unpaid after two moneths since the Feast c. that then c. and in the rejoynder it was alledged that one moyety was behinde per duos menses by the space of two moneths which was no answer because the Indenture is if it be behinde after two moneths post duos menses and he said it was behinde per duos menses which is no affirmation that it was behinde after two moneths but by implication and argumentation and not otherwise and therefore not good Every Recovery had in our Law must be pleaded certainly to every intent Ployd 65. a. as in 22. E. 4. f. 8. in a Scire facias to have execution of two hundred Acres of Land the Tenant pleaded that since the Scire facias sued that I. B. brought a Formedon of one hundred Acres inter alia and recovered and had execution judgement of the breif for parcell and there the opinion was the Plea was not good for every Recovery ought to be pleaded certianly to every intent and those words inter alia are certaine to no intent and it is good reason for every Recovery is entire and there is one originall and one judgment upon it and so the judgement is one and entire and therefore to say that inter alia he did recover is not good but ought to plead certainly If a Bar hath matter of substance and is good to a common intent it shall suffice although it be not good to every speciall intent Ployd Colthersts Case f. 26. a. and as Coke Com. 303. There are three sorts of certainties first to a certaine intent in generall as in counts replications and other pleadings of the Plaintiff 2. A certaine intent to every particular as in Estopples 3. A certainty to a common intent and this is sufficient in a Barr which is to defend the party and to excuse him and of this certainty it is said the Bar shall be good if it be good to a common intent Ployd f. 31. a. but this common intent is not such an intent which may be indifferent but such an intent that hath more vehement presumption in intendement then any other intent hath as fully to administer all the goods which were to the testator the day of his death is a good Bar yet it may be he had other goods which were never in the hands of the Testator which are Assets as debts paid after or goods which come in liew c. but that is not the most common intent but the more common intendement is that he had not any other goods but those which were the Testators So in a Formedon in descender ne donna pass is a good Barr yet it may be he hath recovered in value in which case other Lands were given and yet the Formedon lyes but that shall not be intended but the common intendement is to expresse the plaine guift by livery but if I pleade in Bar a lease for anothers life there the Bar is not good without averring the life of cefis que vie for it was indifferent whether he was in life or no and hath no more stronge intendement the one way then the other therefore his life must be averred by expresse words so in debt upon an obligation if the Defendant pleade in Barr a release bearing date since the obligation made that Bar is not good if he doth not shew by expresse words that it was delivered since the obligation made for prima facie one will presume that it was delivered when it bore date but of the other part it shall be presumed also that the other would not bring an action of debt if the release was delivered since and so one way it hath as vehement presumption as another and for that the intendement is indifferent it is not good unlesse it be shewen by the Plea that it was delivered since the obligation made Ployd ibidem vide plura f. 26. Grounds and Maximes proceeding from the Predicaments From the Predicament of substance SVbstantia prior dignor est accidente Arist 2. de anima the substance is more worthy and before the accident and therefore doth the Law prefer matters of substance before forme and circumstance as 21. H. 7. 24. b. Pleas in Barr and replications though the Plaintiff be afterwards non-suit make an Estopple for they are expresse allegations and substantiall as in debt upon an obligation if the Defendant pleade in Barr an acquittance made at D. or if the Defendant pleade an acquittance and the Plaintiff replyeth that it was made by duress of imprisonment at D. now in another action neither the Defendant shall pleade that the acquittance nor the Plaintiff that the duress was at another place because they were materiall But the matter in the writ and the count maketh no Estopple for they are
renunciaverit amplius repetere non potest n. f. 139. a. As a Retraxit is a bar of all other actions of the like or inferior nature for he which once renounceth his action can no more renew it It is a generall rule that non-suite before appearance is not peremptory in any case for that a stranger may purchase a writ in the name of him who hath cause of action and regularly a non suit after appearance is not peremptory but that he may commence an action of like nature againe for it may be he hath mistaken something in that action or was not provided of his proofes or mistaken the day or the like But yet for some speciall reasons non-suit in some actions is peremptory as in a quare impedit if the Plaintiff bee non-suit after apparance the Defendant shall make a title and have a Writ to the Bishop and this is peremptory to the Plaintiff and is a good bar in another quare impedit and the reason is because the Defendant had by the judgement of the Court a writ to the Bishop and the incumbent which commeth in by that writ shall never be removed which is a flat barre as to that presentation and for the same law and upon the same reason so it is in the case upon a discontinuance Coke com f. 139. a. vide ibidem plura Actio personalis moritur cum persona a personall action dieth with the person Went. off of executors f. 1. 97. As if a keeper of a Prison suffereth one in execution to escape and dieth no action lyeth against his Executors If Lessee for yeares doth wast and dieth an Action of wast lyeth not against his Executor or Administrator for wast done before that time Coke com f. 53. b. so if the tenant doth wast and he in the reversion dieth the heire shall not have an Action of wast for the wast done in the life of his Ancestor nor the master of an Hospitall or a parson for wâ—st done in the life of the predecessor ibidem The Lessor covenants to pay quit rent during the terme and dieth his Executors shall not pay it because it is a personall covenant in the Lessor onely Dier 114. Yet if there be three copartners and they Lease the land and one of them die and hath issue and the Lessee commit wast and one of them die and hath issue the Aunt and the issue shall joyne in an Action of wast and the issue shall recover one moyety of the Land wasted and the Aunt the other notwithstanding that actio injuriarum moritur cum persona But in favorabilibus magis attenditur quod prodest quam quod nocet in indifferent and favourable things that which profiteth is more respected then that which hurteth Relatio tunc fieri non debet si per eam actus destruatur Reg. I. c. Decius 363. Quando dispositio referri potest ad duas res ita quod secundum relationeÌ„ una vitiatur secunduÌ„ aliaÌ„ utilis sit tunc facienda est relatio ad illam ut valeatdispositio semper ita fiat relatio ut valeat dispositio C. l. 6. f. 76. b. a. A relation then ought not to be when by it an Act is destroyed As in the statutes of 32. and 34. H. 8. concerning Wills whereof is provided that every person having any Mannors Lands c. holden in capite shall have full power c. to dispose by his last will in writing or otherwise by any Act or Acts lawfully executed in his life two parts of the same Mannor c. for the advancement of his wife preferment of his children and payment of his debt or otherwise at his will and pleasure any Law statute c. those words or otherwise at his wil pleasure have reference relation only to the last wil not to the acts executed for otherwise none might have devised two parts but onely for the advancement of his wife and preferment of his children or payment of his debts which is not the intention of the Act but that he may devise two parts to whom he will so that the third descend and it was in vaine to referre those words or otherwise at his will and pleasure to Acts executed for he can do that without any authority given to him by that act And therefore when the disposition may be referred to two things so as according to the relation one of them may be destroyed and according to the other shall be commodious then the relation is to be made to that that the disposition may be of force and alwayes the relation is so to be that the disposition may availe in Sir G. Cursons case So Coke l. 3. f. 28. b. Butler and Bakers case relation is a fiction in law to make a nullity of a thing from the beginning to a certaine intent which in truth had being and the rather for necessities sake ut res magis valeat quam pareat As if a man make a gift in taile to Baron and feme and afterwards grants the reversion of those Lands and since the Baron dies and the feme to have her dower waiveth and disagreeth to the estate taile now in regard of her it is a nullity of the estate from the beginning and to such an intent the Law faineth that the estate was onely made to the baron but as to the grant of the reversion that is a collaterall Act and her refusall shall not have such relation for she may be endowed though that estate stand and so no necessity and therefore without necessity ut res magis valeat the Law will not faine any nullity but in a destruction of a loyall estate vested the law will never make any fiction vide ibidem plura So relation shall make things have been as if as if they never had been 1. H. 7. 16 The husband disagreeth to a Feoffement made by his wife it is void from the beginning so that he may plead ne infeosse pas so 14. H. 8. 10. A devise is that the Executors may sell land c. when they sell all meane charges made by the heire in the interim shall be avoided by relation to the time of the death of the Testator so 14. H. 8 18. I disseise A. to the use of B. the dissiesee releaseth to mee and then B. agreeth with the disseisee this agreement by relation shall be as if he had agreed before the release and so shall defeat it Jurors alien their Lands away between the teste of the Writ of attaint and judgement yet they shall be charged to the King for the estreptment by relation 22. E. 3. 16. Caufe of Assise brought for rescuing a distresse taken for rent and then an Office is found which entitleth the King who seiseth the Land and then an Ouster le maine is sued the Assise is gone for ever because the King shall be said to be in possession at the time of the rescous
upon whose possession no distresse could be made 31. Ass 1. Ployd 281. a b. If one taketh letters of administration of the Ordinary of the goods of one which died intestate and after the Metropolitan committeth the administration to another because the intestate had goods to the value of ten pound in diverse Diocesse there it disproveth the authority of the first administrator and shall make the second Administrator to avoide the act of the first Admistrator for the relation after the probat taketh away all imperfection that before may be alledged and shall over-reach the administration and the authority of the Administrator as the Lord Dier termes it and Keble said in this case W in H. 7. that the second Administrator shall have an Action of trespasse against the first Administrator for taking of the first goods for the first Ordinary which committed the administration had not authority to do it when the intestate had goodes to the value of ten pound in diverse Diocess but the administration and all dependance upon it were utterly disproved by the commission of the second administration vide ibidem plura in Greisbrookes case So 38. H. 6. 7 Goods taken out of the possession of an Executor which refuseth and an administration is committed to I. S. I. S. may have an action of trespasse supposing they were taken out of his possession for he by relation shal be said to be an administrator from the very time of the death of the testaor Relation is a fiction in Law and a fiction in Law is a fained construction when in a similitudinary sort the Law construeth a thing otherwise then it is in truth Finch nomot f. 66. and is of the person or the thing Of the person QVi facit per alium per se ipsum facere videtur Coke com f. 258. a. He that doth any thing by another seemeth to doe it by himselfe As the servant by command of the Master may make claime from the Land for his Master if the servant doth all that which he was commanded and which his Master ought to doe there it is as sufficient as if his master did it himselfe And if the disseisor levy a fine according to the statute with proclamations and a stranger without any command precedent enter in the name of the disseisee to avoide the fine if the disseisee after assent to the said entry of the sad stranger it shall be as sufficient as a command for omnis ratihabitio retro trahitur mandato aequiparatur Reg. 1. C. Every ratification or approving of any thing looketh back and is all one as if a man had give commandement at the first Ployd f. 290. a. Chapmans case If I will by my last will that I. S. alien my Land and he doth so it is my alienation by him and if I give authority to my Bayliff to sell my sheep or other cattle and he doth so it is my sale by him and Ployd 475. b. In Sanders case If I command one to beat another and hee beats him so as he dieth of it I shall be accessary to the murther for my commandement was the foundation of it and my commandement outreacheth to all that which followeth the fact So if I command one to burne an house feloniously in the night and he doth so and the fire thereof burneth another house I shall be accessary to the burning of the other house and if I have a pardon for the one I shall be hanged for the other but if I command one to burne such an house which he well knoweth and he burneth another I shall not be accessary or if I commanded him to rob a Goldsmith going to Sturbridge faire and he breaketh open his house in Cheapeside and stealeth his Plate I shall not be accessary to that burglary because there is no affinity between the fact and my command but if I command one to kill him with poyson and he killeth him with a Sword or to kill one in the field and he killeth him in the city or to kill him such a day and he killeth him another day it is murder in me because the death is the principall matter that hath ensued upon my commandement and the place the instrument and the time and such like are nothing but the manner and forme how he should be slaine and not the substance of the matter and the variance in manner and forme shall not discharge him from being an accessary ibidem So an accessary before the fact is subject to all the contingencies pregnant of the fact if they be pursuances of the same fact as if a man command or councell a man to rob another or beat him grieveously murther ensueth in either case he is accessary to the murther quia in criminalibus praestant accidentia 18. E. 175. If I command one to doe a trespasse I shall be a trespassor or if I consent for there are no accessaries in trespasses N. Max. f. 99. In trespass against A. the indenture is that B. did strike me by A. invitation and well 39. H. 5. 42. If a man have a Baylife or servant who is known for his servant and he send him to faires and markets to buy to sell or do any thing marketable his Master shall be charged with the payment if the thing which is Merchandised comes to his use and so if a man send his boy to Market consideratis considerandis 2. R. 2. det 3. per curiam And if a man maketh another his factor to buy things for him if he buy Marchandises of any the master shall be charged by this contract though the goods come not to his possession because he gave him such power 4. E 2. det 168. by Pigot If a servant borrow or receive mony in his masters name the master shall not be charged unlesse it be done by his masters commandement or come to his use by his consent and it is a rule in the civill Law quod jussu alterius solvitur pro eo est quasi ipfi solutum sit Noy Max. f. 99. A promise made to the wise in consideration of a thing to be performed by the husband if the husband agree and performe the consideration in an action of the case c. he shal declare the assumption made to him Ib. f. 19. An annuity is granted to one untill he be promoted to a benefice by the grantor and his heires in a Writ of annuity he sheweth that the Plaintiff was promoted by his brother at his request and well 35. E. 3. 51. Dier 241. It is no good returne for the Sheriff Mandavit baliivo Itineranti who answereth that he is arrested and made a rescous for it is the arrest of the Sheriff himselfe and if it were a capias ad satisfaciendum or a capeas utlegatum after judgement the Sheriff himselfe shall be charged with the escape unlesse it were by the enemies of the King and he shall have his remedie over against him
who made the rescous by action of the case but if he had been a Bayliff of a Liberty it had been a good returne The Prior of St. Joanes had a priviledge from Rome that he shall pay no Tythes for any Land quae propriis manibus aut sumptibus excolitur which is tilled with his owne hands or at his owne charge The Prior maketh a Lease for yeares before the dissolution the King after the dissolution granteth the reversion it was holden that after the terme expired the Patentee should hold it discharged si propriis manibus aut sumptibus excolitur if it be tilled by him or his servants but if he make a Lease to a farmer he shall pay tythes by the Stat. of 31. H. 8. c. 13. Dier Entry with my beast is my entry and so the Plaintiff shall declare upon a clausum fregit 15. E. 4. 29. 1. E. 4. 15. If a mans servant selleth to me cloth and warranteth it to be of a certaine length the action will lie against the master onely and not against the servant and if A do assume to cure B. of a wound and he sendeth his servant to B. to lay medicines to the wound whereby he is hurt and emparied B. shall have an action against the Master and not against the servant Fulb. l. 1. f. 4. 11. E. 4. 6. By Choke and Brian The Chancellor of the Augmentation Court delivered an obligation made to Queene Mary to his Servant to deliver to the Clerks of the Augmentation The Obligor and his servant conspire together and cancell the obligation the Master was held in this case to be chargeable Dyer 161. If a receiver or Bayliff make a deputy the Writ of account shall be brought against the Bayly only because the mony was received to his use 18. H. 8. 2. Fulb. l. 2. f. 43. A lease for years is made and a letter of Attorny to deliver possession to the Lessee if the Attorny deliver possession to the Attorny of the Lessee it is a good possession and pursuing his authority 25. Eliz. The Earle of Leisters Case Yet many personall things cannot be done by another as Sute reall at the Leete Exception or the Sheriffs turne cannot be done by another Fuâ—b l. 25 2. A man cannot excuse himselfe by an Attorny for contempt as for not serving the Kings Processe but in proper person 22. E. 4. 34. An action of debt upon an obligation the Defendant confessed the Deed and said that he had paid the summ to one C. the generall receiver of the Plaintiff who said he was ready to receive the mony and shewed to the Court the acquittance but because he shewed no warrant of the Plaintiff to pay the money to C. the acquittance that was shewed could not be the Deed of the Plaintiff and therefore the Plaintiff recovered his debt and damages 5. E. 3. 63. Fulb. l. 1. f. 4. Quod per me non possum nec per alium Coke l 4. 24. b. What I cannot doe by my selfe I cannot do by another Custome hath so established and fixed the estate of the Copyholder as by the severance of the inheritance the Copyholder of the Mannor is not distroyed for in that the Lord himselfe cannot oust the Copy-hold no more can any one claiming under him doe it for what I cannot doe by my selfe I can do by another vide ibidem the case between Marrell and Smith Coke l. 11. f. 87. a. In the case of Monopolies A patent was granted by the King unto Edward Darcy for the sole making of Cardes who had made a deputy but it was held void to both for in that it was voide to the Grantee because he was inexpert and the grant made void to him he could not make any expert deputy to supply his place for what I cannot doe by my selfe I cannot doe by another Accessorium non ducit sed sequitur suum principale An accessory doth not leade but followeth the principall Co. Com. 152 a. The incident shal passe by the grant of the principall but not the principall by the grant of the incident As a lease for terme of life rendring rent the Lessor granteth a reversion to another the tenant aturneth all the rents and services shall passe by the word reversion but if he grant the rent to another the Reversion shall not passe by it Littleton ibidem a Lease of a Mannor wherein is a Parke and Fish-ponds excepting the game and after the Lessor grants the reversion the Deeres and Fish shall passe as incidents with the reversion A Statute new made gives an action where none lay before the same Processe Judgement and Execution shall be in the same action as was in other cases at the common Law though the Statute say no such thing 10. H. 7. 10. Coke l. 5. f. 21. b. A Parson is bound to a Prior in one hundred pound upon condition that he resigne his Church within a certaine time to the Prior for a certaine pension as they should agree c. and afterwards the Prior and the Parson agreed of a pension of an hundred shillings and yet the Parson refused to resigne and by the whole Court it was holden that he needeth not to resigne untill he was sure of his pension by Deed. Ployd 235. a. When a man hath a thing by reason of another the thing which comes by reason of the other shall be said to be had in the same capacity as the other was which was the cause of it as 41. E. 3. f. 21. If a Bishop having a villain in right of his Church enter into the Land purchased by the villain he shall retaine it as in right of his Church So if the King have a signiory in right of the Crowne and the Tenant seise and disclaime by which the King recovereth the tenancy he shall hold it in right of the Crowne because in that right he held the signiory which was the occasion of the Recovery ibidem Williams case Noxa caput sequitur accessorium sequitur suum principale Reg. I. C. The offence looketh on the head and the accessory followeth the principall Coke l. 4. f. 44. b. Every Felon is either a principall or an accessory and if there be no principall there cannot be any accessory because the accessory followeth the principall and therefore was Vaux held by the Court to be a principall murtherer although he was not present at the time of the receit of the poison and if any other had procured Vaux to do it he had been accessory vide ibidem plura Vaux Case Coke Com. 57. a. b. In the highest and lowest offences there are no accessories but all principalls as in Riots Routs and forcible Entries and in other transgressions vi armis So in the highest offence as crimine laesae Majestatis there are no accessories And by our Law in murther all that be present aiding abetting or comforting him doth the murther are principall offenders though they
diversi desiderantur actus ad aliquem statum perficiendum plus respicit lex actum originalem when to the perfection of an estate or interest diverse Acts or things are required the Law hath more regard to the originall Act vide ibidem Lamperts Case When a man seised of Lands in Fee-simple or Fee-taile generall taketh a Wife to the perfection of her Dower two things are requisite lawfull matrimony and the death of her husband and if baron and feme levy a fine the feme is barred of her Dower because that the intermarriage and seisin are the fundamentall causes of Dower and the death of the baron onely the execution of it for the beginning is the principal part upon which all others are founded and therfore in such case if baron and feme grant a rent by fine out of the Land or make a lease for years rendring rent to the baron and his heires and then the feme recovereth Dower shee shall hold that charge with the rent and with the terme and the opinion of Ployden in Stowells case 373. is not holden for Law as appeareth by Dyer f 72. and in Damports case Dyer 224. it was adjudged to the contrary 2. H. 4. and now common experience without contradiction is against it and so Littleton in his Chapters of conditions f. 83. holdeth that if the Feoffee upon condition taketh a wife the Feoffee may enter for the condition broken and the reason is for that the Law hath a principall regard to the originall and fundamentall cause and yet it may be said that the title of dower is not consummate untill the death of the husband and peradventure the feme might die before the Baron vide ibidem plura So things are construed according to that which was the beginning thereof as one maketh me sweare to bring him mony to such a place or else he will kill me and I bring it him accordingly this is fellony in him 44. E. 3. 14. b. So if he make me sweare to surrender my estate unto him and I doe so afterwards this is a disseisin to mee 14. Ass Pl. 20. One imprisoned till he bee content to make an obligation at onother place and afterward he doth so being at large yet he shall avoid it by duresse of imprisonment 21. E. 4. 68. b. Outlawry in trespasse is no forfeiture of Land as outlawry of felony is for though the not appearing is the cause of the outlawry in both yet the force of the outlawry shall be esteemed according to the hainousnesse of the offence which is the principall cause and foundation of the processe 3. E. 3. 84. A man and feme sole have a villaine and afterwards enter-marry and the villaine purchaseth Land they shall not have lands by intierties but by moieties joyntly or in common as they had the villaine in the beginning Coke l. 5. f. 47. a. In Littletons case upon the generall pardon of 35. Eliz. Whether upon a bill exhibited in the Star-chamber before the Parliament and processe awarded returnable after the Parliament the suit shall be said to be hanging by bill before the returne or serving of the processe and it was resolved that it was because the bill is origo caput sectae the bill is the beginning and head of the suit Cujusque rei potissima pars principium est origo rei inspici debet Coke com f. 298. b. whereof he saith you shall make great use in the reading of our bookes A disseisor hath issue and entreth into religion by force of which the tenements descend to the issue in this case the disseisee may enter upon the issue because the discent of the issue was by the Act of the father and not by the act of God and the Law respecteth the originall Act which is his entry into religion whereas a descent doth not take away entry unlesse it commeth by death Littleton ibidem An escrowe is delivered by a feme sole if she marry or die yet by relation to the beginning it shall be good 14. 4. H. 2. Lessee for yeares is bound to I. S. to make him the best estate he can and afterwards the reversion falleth to him the Lessee shall be discharged of the Bond if he grantteh the estate he had at the bond making 12. H 8. 5. A stranger abateth after the death of the father the son dieth his wife shall not have dower for this abatement shall relate to the death of the father 21. E. 4. 60. An attainder by Act of Parliament hath relation to the first day of the Sessions 35. H. 8. b. Presentment tempore belli is not good to gaine possession from the right patron though the induction was tempore pacis Coke l. 2. Binghams case and l. 11. f. 99. b. And such an usurpation shall be construed to be in time of War A blow given by one at the time of non sanae memoriae though the party die when he is fanae memoriae it is not capitall Ployd D. Hales case So if a man of non sanae memoriae giveth himselfe a mortall wound and becommeth sanae memoriae and dieth he shall not be felo de se Coke l. 1. Shellies case f. 99. b. A man buyeth certaine beasts in Market which were stolen and selleth them out of the market and the Vendee giveth him a Crowne in earnest and afterwards they are brought into the Market and agreeth to his bargaine and payeth all his mony and also payeth toll for the beasts the property is not changed for the bargaine shall have relation to the first communication Dier f. 99. b. Tenant for life upon condition that if the Lessor die without issue the Lessee shall have see the Lessee entereth into religion and the Lessor dieth without issue the Lessee is dereyned he shall never have fee because at the time of the performance of the condition the fee could not vest in him Ployd f 489. a. In case of attainder by verdict for felony it shall have relation to the time of the fact done 30. H. 6. 5. Lands given in franke-marriage reserving a rent the reservation is void untill the fift degree is passed 26. Ass Pl. 66. One hath a Rent charge going out of his wifes Land the grantee leaseth to the husband and his heires the husband shall not have it but it shall inure to him by way of extinguishment onely as seised in right of his wife 14. H. 8. 6. The wife endowed by the heire is said to be immediately in by the husband and if the husband were a disseisor and the heire in by dissent yet the disseisee may enter upon the wife Littleton The executor refuseth the Administrator may have an action of trespasse for the goods taken out of the possession of the Executor supposing they were taken out of his possession 38. H. 6. 7. A Recovery without an originall is void and judgement given in Chancery without originall is void and an outlawry
incurreth for which day the husband maketh an acquittance supposing the receit of the rent for the said yeare last past and notwithstanding that acquittance his servant distraineth for the rent of half a yeare of the first year being behinde but though the last arrearages before the last terme were due to the feme dum sola fuit yet Harper and Dyer were of opinion that all the arrearages were discharged by the acquittance of the last terme because it is an antient principle That all the arrearages are discharged by the acquittance of the last terme and we ought not to deny principles Coke l. 10. f. 40. a. No man ought to dispute against recoveries the legall pillars of common assurances because we are not to dispute against principles and which St. Germins Doctor and Student c. 26. approveth to binde both in Law and conscience and by the Statute of 23. Eliz. C. 4. That for the avoyding of the dangers of assurances of Lands and the advancement of common recoveries it is provided that any common recovery shall not be avoided for any want of forme in words and not in matter of substance And Sir James Dyer then chiefe Justice did with great gravity and some bitternesse reprove an utter Barrister who rashly inveyed against common recoveries not knowing the reason and foundation of them and said that he was not worthy to be of the profession of the Law who durst speake against common recoveries which were the sinews of assurances and inheritances and founded upon great reason and authority Mary Portingtons Case vide ibidem â—lura Coke Com. f. 343. a. Principium est quasi primum caput a principle is as it were the first head from which many cases have their beginning which is so strong as it suffereth no contradiction and therefore is it said in our Books that ancient principles of the Law ought not to be disputed 11. H. 4. 9. 2. As that of every Land there is a fee-simple and that every Land in fee-simple may be charged in fee by one way or other Littleton ibidem Cessante statu primitivo cessat derivativus Coke l. 8. f. 34. a. The primitive state ceasing the derivative doth cease As if Tenant in taile maketh a lease for lives according to the Statute of 32. H. 8. c. 28. and then dyeth without issue the lease being derived out of the Estate taile shall not continue longer than the Estate taile against the opinion in 33. H. 8. 48. Dyer which was granted by the whole Court Derivativa potestas non potest esse major primitiva Noy max. f 4. A derivative power cannot be greater than it fâ—om which it is derived As the Attorny of one that is disseised cannot make claime of the Land it the disseisee durst have gone to the Land Littleton The Bayliff of a disseisor shall not say that the Plaintiff never had any thing in the Land for the Master himselfe shall not have that Plea because he is not Tenant of the Free-hold 28. Ass Pl. 4. The Servant shall be estopped to say the Free-hold is his Masters by recovery against his Master though the servant himselfe be a stranger to it for he shall not be in better condition tâ—an he whose right he claimeth 2. E. 4. 16. He that gaineth a thing on high shall neither have gaine nor losse thereby Noy Max. f. 11. As if one Joyn-tenant maketh a lease of his Joyntee and dyeth the heire which surviveth shall have the reversion of his Joynture but not the rent because he cometh in by the first Feoffor and not under his companion Dyer 187. So when the Husband is Lessee for years in the right of his wife reserving a rent if he dyeth the wife shall have the residue of the terme but not of the rent ibidem An executor recovereth and dieth intestate Administration of the goods of the Testator is committed to I. S. I. S. shall not sue execution upon this recovery Dower cannot be assigned reserving a rent or with a remainder over for shee is in from the husband and not from him who assigneth Dower Finch f. 13. Quod dignius est prius est minus digno The Law preferreth every thing according to its worthinesse Ployd f. 169. a. and therefore is every thing placed in Writs by the rule of the Register according to its dignity as the Messuage is placed before Lands the Land before Meadow and the Meadow before Pasture and the like and this dignity is taken from necessity for to have an house to inhabite and to defend his body from tempest and violence of weather is more necessary than to have Land to plow it for bread and also to have Land for bread is more necessary than to have Meadow for Hay to feed Cattell and likewise to have Meadow for Hay which will serve all the yeare is more necessary than Pasture c. ibidem And so in the Register the entire thing which is more worthy shall be demanded before the moyety part or parts As in a Replevin if it be of two beasts the one quick the other dead the living thing shall first be demanded Register Quod prius est verius est quod prius jure est potius est tempore Coke Com. f. 347. b. As in a remitter the Law preferreth the first and antient right before the latter and a sure right though it be little before a great estate by wrong which jumpeth with the rule of the Civill Law Quoties duplici jure defertur alicui successio repudiato novo jure quod ante defertur superest vetus Paulus 17. quest As if Tenant in taile discontinueth the taile and after disseiseth the discontinuee and so dyeth seised This is a remitter to the tenant in taile because the Law shall put and adjudge him to be in by force of the tayle which is his antient title for if he should be in by force of the descent then the discontinuee may have a writ of Entry sur disseissin in the per against him and recover the tenement and his damages but being in by force of the taile the title of the discontinuee is quite nullified Qualis causa talis effectus Ployd f. 292. a. Things are construed according to that which is the cause thereof as if an Executor assigne Auditors to one who was accountant to the Testator and the Auditors finde him in arrearages the Action of debt which the Executors shall have shall be in the detinet onely for the debt shall be in them as Executors and have respect to the foundation and cause 11. H. 6. f. 16. by Paston and Newton So if one have a villaine for years as Executor if the villaine purchase Land and the Executors enter the Land shall be to the use of the Testator and it shall be assets in his hands because the villain who was the cause of it was to that use Ibidem Pas 32. H. 8. E. villenage 146. Ployd f. 524. 525.
amercement is pardoned vide ibidem The husband and wife make a lease by Deed the husband dyeth the wife accepteth the rent if the Lessee lose the Deed of the Lease the wife shall avoid it 15. E. 4. 17. Coke l. 1. f. 2. Buchuâ—sts case If the Feoffor make a Feoffment with warranty the Feoffee shall not have the Charters unlesse by expresse grant but the Feoffor shall have all the Charters and Evidences which are materiall for the maintenance of the title of the Land and upon which he may maintain his warranty paramount but if the warranty be determined he shall have them no longer Ployd f. 382. a. Nevills case The King grants to two for their lives and the life of the survivor of them the Sheriff-wike of Chester and one of them was attainted of high Treason all the Office was forfeited because the Office was entire and could not be severed ibidem The King granteth the Office of the keeper of a Parke to two and the one faileth in discharge of his duty the whole fee shall determine so it is if an annuity be granted to two for Counsell and one of them refuse because the Office and Grant is entire and cannot be severed and the cause ceasing but in one the whole annuity shall cease Exception Dyer 320. Pl. 13. An Arbitrement was between two of diverse things and among others there was one article that one party should have yearly for the space of six yeares twenty shillings toward the keeping and honest education of A. B. and A. B. dyeth before the fourth year of the sixth yeare yet the payment of the 20 s. shall not cease during the six years which is a certaine terme and is a duty to the party himselfe towards the finding of A. B. Dier 141. Pl. 44. King Ed. 6. granteth to the Lady Mary his Sister the Mannor of D. for terme of her life according to the Tenor and effect of the last Will of H. 8. which was that shee should have it so long as she was unmarried afterwards she granted a rent charge out of that Mannor after which grant K. E. dieth by whose death the reversion came to her being Queene and afterwards shee married Philip King c. and it was doubted whether the rent charge should remaine or no. Davis 3. a. b. In ancient times a great part of tenements were holden of their Lords by Socage which was that the Tenants ought to come with their sokes by certaine daies by the yeare to plow and sow the demesne of the Lords and because such workes were made for the livelyhood and sustenance of their Lords they were quitted of all other services and after such services were changed into monies by consent of the Lords though the Lords did alien their demesnes and had no lands to plow or sow yet payed they their rents yearely to the Lords so the Church and religious houses after the procuration of Victualls was reduced to a certaine sum did pay it to the Ordinary yearely though he made no visitation so as the rule The cause ceasing the effect also ceased held not in those cases So Coke l. 4. in Capels case it was resolved that where a man held certaine land by rent for Castle-guard though the Castle was ruined or decayed yet the rent remained and pro doth not import a condition as in the case of an annuity granted pro consilio impendendo but a full and perpetuall recompence and satisfaction Vide Davis plura ibidem In jure non remota sed proxima causa spectatur Bacon Max. f. 1. 2. In the Law the next and not the remote cause is respected For it were infinite for the law to judge of the cause of causes and therefore judgeth of acts by the immediate and next cause as Bar. Empsons case f. 2. An annuity is granted pro consitio seu impendendo and the grantee committeth treason whereby hee is imprisoned that the grantor cannot come unto him for counsell yet the annuity is not determined by this non fesans for the law looketh not on the remote cause to wit the grantors offence which was the cause of the imprisonment but excuseth it because his not giving of counsell was compulsory and not voluntary in regard of the imprisonment which was the immediate cause So if a parson maketh a Lease and be deprived or resigneth the successors shall avoid the Lease for the law regardeth not the cause of the deprivation or the resignation which is the act of the party but the act of the Ordinary in the admission of the new incumbent 2. H. 4. 3. 26. H. 8. 2. A foeffment in fee upon condition that the Feoffee shall enfeoff over and if the feoffee bee disseised and a dissent case and then the feoffee bindeth himselfe in a statute which statute is discharged before the recovery of the Land this is no breach of the condition because the land was never lyable to the statute and the possibility which was the remote cause that it should bee lyable upon the recovery the law doth not respect Coke l. 2. Winningtons case This rule faileth in covenous act where the law taketh heed to the corrupt beginning and also in criminall acts where the law principally regardeth the first motive vide ibidem plura Nihil magis consentaneum est us iisdem modis res dissolvatur quibus constituitur Reg. I.C. and Bracton Nihil tam conveniens est naturali aequitati unumquodque dissalvi eo ligamine quo ligatum est Cok. l. 2. f. 53. a. There is nothing more agreeing to naturall equity then that every thing should be dissolved by the same meanes it was bound As no estate can be vested in the King without matter of record so no estate can be devested out of him without matter of record Ployd f. 553. Walsinghams case and 180. Nevils case 12. H. 7. and many other bookes for nothing is so convenient to naturall equity then that every thing should be dissolved by the same band it was tied and Coke l. 4. f. 57. b. In case of attainder and office the King is entitled by double matter of record and therefore the party grieved ought to avoid it by double matter of record and not by single travers or Monstrans de droit but is driven to his petition vide ibidem plura But when a man avoideth the Kings title by as high a matter of record as the King claimeth though the King be entitled by double matter of Record he may have it by way of Plea as one is attainted of treason by Parliament an office findeth his lands by which the King seiseth them the party may alledge restitution by Parliament and a repeale of the former Act 4. H. 7. 7. b. Finch Nomot 12. Coke l. 5. f. 26. a. Indentures being made for declaring of the uses of a subsequent fine recovery or other assurance to certaine persons and within a certaine time and to certaine uses are but
kill her hushand part of which her husband and her Father having eaten were greivously sick whereof her Father complaining to the said Martin Martin stirring the electuary did eate part of it the one and twentieth of May and dyed the 22th of May and it was resolved that Agnes was guilty of the Murther of the said Martin for the Law conjoyneth the murtherous intention of Agnes in putting poyson into the electuary to kill her husband with the event that followed upon it to wit the death of the said Martin for the putting of poyson in the electuary was the cause of the poysoning and death of the said Martin was the event for that is the event which followeth the cause and are called events because they come from the cause and the stirring of the electuary by Martin without putting in the poyson by Agnes could not have been the cause of his death ibidem Frustra expectatur eventus cujus effectus nullus sequitur it is in vaine to expect the event where no effect followeth Coke l. 5 f. 15. b. Cawdrys case As if an excommunication under the Popes bull is not of force to disable any man in England and that if it being the extreame and finall end of any suite in the Court of Rome be not to be allowed in England it consequently followeth that by the antient common Law of England no suite for any cause though it be spirituall arising within this Realme ought to be determined in the Court of Rome for in vaine an event is to be expected of which no effect followeth and that the Bishops of England are the immediate Officers and Ministers to the Kings Courts ibidem Plus virium habent argumenta ex effectis Fons Log. Arguments from the effects are of greater force and therefore doth the Law commonly conster things according to the effects As if a Deed be delivered by an infant it cannot be delivered againe at his full age for it took some effect before and was but voydable 1. H. 6. 4. But a deed delivered by a Feme-covert or a release delivered to one who had nothing in the Land may be delivered againe to wit when shee cometh to be sole or the party to have somewhat in the Land for the first delivery was meerly void and of no effect at all From the whole and the part TOtum praefertur unicuique parti the whole is preferred before either part Coke l. 3. f. 41. in Ratcliffs case As the blood which is between every Heire and his Ancester maketh him Heire for without blood none can inherit and therefore it is great reason that he who hath the whole and entire blood shall inherit before him who hath but part of the blood of his Ancester because by the order of nature the whole is to be preferred before the part And therefore saith Bracton Proptâ—r jus sanguinis duplicatum dicitur haeires tam ex parte matris quam ex parte patris propinquior soror quum frater de alia uxore that from the double right of blood as well from the part of the father as from the part of the Mother the Sister is said to be the neerer heire then the brother of the other wife and Britton saith that the right of blood in this case maketh the Female to exclude the male ibidem And therefore by the common Law of England if a common person have issue a Son and a Daughter by one venter and a Son by another venter and dyeth seised of Lands in Fee-simple and the eldest Son entereth into the Land and dyeth without issue the Sister of the whole blood shall inherit to him and not the brother of the halfe blood Coke ibidem 40. b. Vbi major pars ibi totum where the major part is there is the whole 21. E. 4. 27. 14. H. 8. 27. The Deane and major part of the Chapter maketh the Croporation and their act is the act of the Corporation though the others doe not agree which accordeth with the rule of the Canon Law authoritas potestas capituli consistit in majore pare ejus saniâ—ri sic totum capitulum facere dicitur quod facit major sanior pars Panorâ—â—tanus The authority and power of a Chapter consisteth in the greater and sounder part and so the whole Chapter is said to doe what the major and sounder part doth But here this difference is to be taken that in Colledges and Corporations the major part of the Members ought to give their voices in a distinct number and not in a confused and incertaine number as in the election of the Knights of Parliament or the Coronors or Virderors in the County Court the greater voice and acclamation is sufficient to shew the assâ—nt of the greater part of the Free-holders who make the election Ployd 126. a. So as the major part of the Chapter doth consent in making this confirmation and this consent ought to be expressed by the fixing of the Seale 14. H. 6. 17. So ought they to sit in one place and at one time for otherwise it may be called an assent and not a consent where the lease ought to be confirmed by the assent and consent of the Deane and Chapter for as the body naturall cannot make any perfect act if it be dismembred no more can a body politique but the persons which are members of it ought to be capitulariter congregati in a certaine place otherwise if they be scattered or dispersed in severall places that which they doe shall not be said to be the Act of the Corporation but factum singulorum as 15. E. 4. 2. a. where the major part of the Monkes had subscribed their hands to a deed of the Abbot but it was not expressed that it was done with the assent and consent of the Covent it was said to be done by those particular persons which had subscribed and not by the Corporation and such a deed shall not bind the house yet the Deane and Chapter are not confined to their Chapter-house but they may meet to and make their Acts elsewhere and therefore it is holden 21. E. 4. 26 That where a Deed did beare date in domâ— capituli averrement might be that the deed was delivered at another place yet the major part ought to be present in the same place and therefore the election of Coroners ought to be in pleno comitatu as appeareth by the Writ de coronatore eligendo So the consent of the major part of the Chapter ought to be at the same time simul semel and not scatteringly and upon severall daies for it is not a consent unlesse it be simul for consensus est voluntas multoâ—um ad ques res pertinet simul juncta for consent is the will of many joyned together concerning those things which appertaine unto them Davis f. 48. vide ibidem plura Turpâ—s est pars quae cum suo toto non convenit It is a foule and deformed
Ward within Lond. but God forbid but that the Jurors may find assets by descent in any other county within England for the Law is that the Plaintiff in such case shall have execution of all the Lands the heire had and peradventure he might have Lands in diverse counties and therefore though a place be named for necessity sake yet the Jurors may find all that which by law may be chargeable in such a case in whatsoever City and County it lyeth and so was the principall case resolved after in 10. Eliz. though it be not reported there and with it agreeeth 10. H. 6. 13. And the conceit of Brook 2. Mar. Attaint 104. that the jurors of one county are not compellable to find transitory things in another county was altogether denyed by the whole Court for they are bound under the paine of attaint to finde assets in any other county whatsoever for it may be that the executors have goods of the Testators in divers severall counties and that in none of those counties had by him there is assets vide ibidem plura And if the Excutors have any goods of the Testators in any part of the world he shall be charged in respect of them or if Merchants and others which have goods of great value beyond the Seas be indebted in England if those goods should not be liable to their debts it would be a great defect in Law Ib. Coke com f. 282. a. It is an ancient principle of the Law that for transitory actions the Plaintiff may alledge the same in what place or county he will and the Jurors upon not guilty pleaded are to be made to find for the Plaintiff neither can the assault battery or finding of goods c. alledged in another county be traversed without special cause of justification which extendeth to some speciall place as if a Constable of a towne in another County arresteth the body of a man that breaketh the peace there he may traverse the County but he must not rest there but all other places saving in the town where he is Constable vide ibidem plura But in the case of felony the triall shall be by the common Law in the same place where the offence was and shall not be supposed in any other place for in criminall causes the rule holdeth Ubi quis deliquit ibi punietur Coke l. 6. f. 47. b. where one offendeth there he shall be punished yet this rule faileth in treason to adhere to the enemy of the King without the Realme which is declared to be treason by the common Law by the statute of 25. E. 3. de proditionibus for least there should be a want of triall in matter of such consequence the adherence without the Realme must be alledged in some place within England and if upon the indictment they shall find any adherences out of the realme they shall finde the Delinquent guilty 5. R. 2. triall 24 but commonly they did indite him in that county where his Lands did lie which were to be forfeited and so it is declared by the statute of 35. H. 8. c. 2 vide Coke com 261. f. b. Saepe locus in delcto auget vel minuit culpam Reg. I. C. The place doth often augment or diminish the offence as he who striketh a man in Westmin Hall shall have his right hand cut off his Lands Chattels forfeited so if he strike a Juror and besides shall be committed to perpetuall Prison Finch Nâ—mot f. 25. If men tilt or turney in the presence of the King and if two masters of defence play their prizes on the stage and kill one another it is not felony Heb. Rep. f. 89. So tâ—e felonious taking of goods out of any Church or Chappel is sacriledge and a felony more hainous then ordinary and therefore more severely punished It was King Alureds Law Qui in templo quid clepscrit valorem solvito mulctampretio rei congruam pendito manum quacumque furatus est praecidito nec redimere manum potest nisi propria capitis aestimatione whosoever shall steale any thing in a Church let him restore the value let him pay a fine answerable to the worth of the thing let that hand with which he did steale be cut off neither could he redeem his hand but with the price of his life which in those antient times wherein offences were not so frequent was a grievous punishment wherin their was chiefly censured with satisfaction but in the succeeding worser times by the statute of 23. H. 8. It was made capitall without the benefit of Clergy So to kill the Kings Chancellor Treasurer Justices in Eyre and Assise of Oyer and Terminer being in his place and doing his Office is high treason Dalt 226. Si desit obedientia non adjuvat locus Coke l. 7. f. 24. b In Calvins case If obedience be wanting the place furthereth not Samaria in Syria was the cheife City of the ten Tribes but being conquered by the King of Syria and the Jews taken Prisoners and carried away into captivity was after inhabited by the Paynims yet because the people of Samaria were not under actuall obedience by the judgement of the chiefe Justice of the whole world they were adjudged alienigenae Aliens Luke c. 17. Where one of them who was cleansed of his Leprosy by our Saviour being a Samaritan returned and gave praise to God and is by our Saviour called an alien that is a stranger borne because he had the place but wanted the obedience and where obedience is wanting the place helpeth not And this agreeth with the divine saying Si locus salvare potuisset Satan de coelo pro sua inobedientia non cecidisset Adam in Paradiso non cecidisset Lot in Monte non cecidisset sed potius in Sodom If the place could save one Satan for his disobedience had not fallen from heaven Adam had not fallen in Paradise and Lot in the Mountain had not fallen but rather in Sodom A Paribus from equals PArium eadem est ratio things are to be construed according to equality of reason Coke l. 3. f. 12. b. As upon a recognisance acknowledged by the Ancestor or in a judgement upon an action of debt given against him if he dieth sâ—ised of two Acres whereof one is holden in Burrough english or having issue two daughters which make partition in this case if one be onely charged the other shall have contribution because they are in aequali jure in equall right So if a man be bound in a statute or recognisance and after his death some of the land descendeth to the heir of the part of the father and some to the heire of the part of the mother in this case one onely shall not be charged and if he be he shall have contribution against the other So in dower if the tenant vouch the heire in three severall wards every one shall be equally charged as it is agreed 11. H 7. 22. Ibidem
part of my father but oâ—herwise the release is good without any averrment for the thing was certainly expressed by the first woâ—ds in which case other words were needlesse and superfluous and in vaine were it to expresse that by more words which may be expressed by fewer and 30. Ass Pl. 8. Lands given to two uni eorum diutius viventi and to the longer liver of them they make partition and one of them dyeth the Lessor shall have againe the moyety of him that dyed for uni eorum diutius viventi are but idle words Omnis propositio est aut verae aut falsa every proposition is either true or false truth as it is a congruity of an entity with the intellect instrumentally appertaineth to Logick because it directeth the minde to apprehend the truth of things and is opposite to falsity contradictorie especially in propositions for all propositions are either true or false Quae ad idem secundum idem similiter eodem tempore nunquam possunâ— simul esse verae which to the same according to the same after the same manner and in the same time never can be both true Fucatus erroâ—â—uda veritate in multis est prohabilior sepenumero multis rationibus vertiatem vincit Arist Coke l. 2. f. 72. Painted error in many things seemeth more probable then truth and oftentimes with many reasons overcometh the truth therefore hath the Law a great reâ—pect to verity and requireth that it be acknowledged and confessed in all actions under the penalty of a mercement and accordingly if the tenant doth not render the Land to the demandant as he was commanded by the Writ but persistâ—th in defence of it till judgement be given against him by the Law he is to be amerced Coke l. 5. f. 49. Va gâ—ans case And therefore one of the chiefest things which the Law requireth in counts is verity and if it appeare to the Court that falsity is uttered in lieu of verity the party which sheweth it hath annoyed and confounded himselfe Ployd f. 84. b. And therefore if a man bring an Action of debt for two payments at two dayes where one of them is not come by the shewing of the Plaintiff himself he hath by it abated his own writ because that he hath shown a falsity T. 9. H. 7. 3. And so in our case he hath grounded his matter upon a Statute by him recited where it appeareth judicially that there was no such Statute made at that time and so he hath abated his count by his own shewing ibidem Partridges case and sâ— p. 20. H. 6. f. 30. A writ of Champerty was brought which was not warranted by any Statute and there Newton said that if the party cannot shew unto them any Statute by which it was warranted that they will award that the writ shall abate And therefore abundance and reciting more then needeth shall many times hurt the party as T. 20. H. 6. f. 42. A man brought a writ for forging of false deeds and the writ was diversa facta munimenta and he counted but for one onely and by the assent of all the Justices it was awarded that the writ shall abate because the writ was for diverse Deeds and he counted but for one vide ibidem If the Writ vary from the Obligation or other specialty in name or sur-name or such like the Writ shall abate 11. E. 4. 2. As in an action of debt for twenty pound and he declareth but for ten pound both shall abate 8. E. 4. 2. An Essoine or protection varying from the originall Writ in the quantity of the tenancy or the name of the party shall be quashed 4. Ass pl. 1. 2. H. 6. 3. A Chancellors servant bringing a Writ of priviledge varying from the originall Writ as if the originall be a Writ of Trespasse and the priviledge in a Plea of debt or the originall be in an action of debt of 44 l. and the Writ in a Plea of debt 42 l. it shall be disallowed 7. H. 6. 22. Lex non requirit verificari quod apparet curiae Coke l. 9. f. 54. b. The Law doth not require that to be verified which appeareth to the Court though the Law of England be more precise in the forme of pleading then any other forraine Law as well in counts as bars wherein averrements and offers of proofes are commonly concluded as in counts the course of declaration is in the beginning of every action to offer their witnesses and therefore the conclusion is allwayes inde producit sectam which secta or suite in Law language is nothing but witnesses to prove his action as Mr. Selden upon Fortescue accurately observeth c. 21. f. 23. And so also in bars the Law doth also require that all affirmative pleadings in defence to the intent the issue and point which cometh to be tryed might be evident and cleere to the Jury should be averred that is an offâ—r made of proofes Yet Qâ—od constat clare non debet verificari that which plainly appeareth ought not to be verified Coke l. 9. f. 54. b. in Batens case As if an infant bring an assize of Mortdancester it is needlesse to aver that he is within the time of limitation for it appeareth by the infancy of the Plaintiff and 46. E. 3. In Trespasse of taking monies it is needlesse to shew the value because it appeareth vide ibidem plura Floyd f. 87. b. It is pleaded that the Lessee did surrender to the Grantee of the reversion it is needlesse to pleade an atturnement for a surrender is an atturnement and more H. 13. H. 7. 11. by Keble vide ibidem plura in Partridges case Et manifesta probatione non indigent Coke l. 7. f. 40. a. b. M nifest things need no proofe as if the Father tenant by Knights service enfeoff his Son and Heire apparent within age it needeth not to aver it to be collusion for it is apparent Wimbich case Ployd 27. H 8. Dacres case So if I covenant to stand seised to my Wife Son or Cosin it is good to raise an use without expresse words of consideration for sufficient consideration and his Fatherly love appeareth vide ibidem plura Non refert quid ex aequipollentibus siâ—t it is a rule of Law and reason It mattereth not what is done by equipollent or words which amount to such a value Coke l. 5. 122 a Longs case It was an exception taken to an enditement in that case that they gave him unum vulnus mortale one mortal wound whereas it should have been plagam one mortall stroke but it was disallowed by the whole Court and said that these words were Synonimas and signified the same though that plaga is the most usuall word in an Enditement f. 121. vide ibidem plura Coke l. 5. f. 89 a Frostes case A Capias Vtlegatum was brought to the Sheriffs of the city of London against B. who was in custody of
Laborne in his house being one of the Seriants of the City of London Frost cometh to Laborne with a Warrant from the Sheriffs to arrest the said â— upon the Capias Utlegatum which he utterly refuseth but suffereth him to goe at large upon an action of the case brought against the Sheriffs supposing that the Sheriffs arrested him and suffered him to goe at large the Defendants pleaded that they did not suffer him to goe at large and judgment was given for the Plaintiff and the verdict warranted well the count for in judgement of Law the Sheriff and his Serjeants are words equipollent amount to so much and is all one as if the Sheriffs had arrested the said B. vide ibidem plura A Writ is to the Sheriff and he returneth virtute praecepti he hath done well for it is equipollent virtute brevis 11. H 6. 16. In a Writ it is said quam clamat esse jus this equipolleth with a Fee-simple and therefore in the subsequent part of the Writ if he instanceth in a lesser estate as ex dono for life the Writ shall abare 39. H. 5. 38. Upon an Enditement for celebrating Masse contra formam Statuti 1. El I was holden that under this terme Minister a Preist was included because a Preist is bound to celebrate and minister the holy communion c. and also it was holden by all that the terme Clerk is sufficient to prove him a Preist or a Minister Dyer f. 203. b. Coke l. 5. f. 4. b. Verus antiquus redituus the true and antient rent is not to be understood of the quality incident to it but of the quantity of the rent for that is the effect and substance of the thing reserved as if the antient reservation was of rent to be paid in Gold and the novell reservation was to be paid in Silver or if a quarter of Corne was antiently reserved and now the lease is made rendring eight bushells of Corne it is all one for the Law respecteth not the formes of words or their quality but the substance and effect of the matter parum differunt qui re concordant and they differ little which agree and equipoll in substance If one maketh his Will and committeth the Administration to one by it he shall be Executor because it is all one in substance 3. H. 6. so by the grant of a Church the advowson shal passe 7. E. 3. 15. One granteth the nomination of an Advowson Habendum the advowson the Habendum is good for it is the same thing so one granteth the remainder whereas he had a reversion it is good enough to make the thing passe 6. E. 6. Ante 134. vide Ployd 157. b. If a man lease to one an acre of Land for life reserving to himselfe the herbage the reservation is void because he hath leased the same thing in substance and the profits of the Land and the Land it selfe are all one 38. H 6. 34. Words of substance and not usuall are equivalent to words of substance and usuall Ployd 140. b. As if tenant for life and his Lessor make a Feoffment in fee it is the Feoffment of the Lessee for life and the confirmation of the Lessor though there be not a word of a confirmation in it and if tenant for yeares and the Lessor make a Feoffment in fee it shall be the livery and Feoffment of the Lessor and the surrender of the Lessee and yet there was not one word of surrender And if a commoner maketh a deed to the tenant of the Land by which he renounceth the common unto him it shall enure as a release because the words are equivalent to a release So if Land be leased by Indenture for yeares and Covenants made to render and pay for the tenements such a summ it is all one as a reservation of a rent and if the Lessor say I wil have twenty pound rent and the Lessee agree or if the Lessee say I will give twenty shillings rent and the Lessor agree it is a good reservation of a rent so if a man be bound by Obligation to en feoffe I. S. and he maketh a lease for years and a release in fee he hath performed the condition because they are all one vide ibidem Yet words of art may not be supplyed by equivalent and equipollent words though they beare the same sense and substance as in an Enditement of murder voluntarie ex mulitia praecogitata interfecit is not sufficient but the word murder avit must be so in an Enditement quod quoddam tormentum in H. L. exoneravit dans eidem H.L. cum pelletto plumbeo predicto vulnus mortale Dans ei vulnus mortale c. is not sufficient but it should have been percussit which is the word of art Coke l. 5. f. 222. b. Longes case And the reason of this is given by Coke in his Preface to Littleton that words of art are so apt and significant to expresse the true sense of the Laws and so woven into the Laws themselves as it is in a manner impossible to change them neither ought legall termes to be changed SECT 4. From naturall Philosophy NExt to Logick by whose principles as by many hands we are conducted to the knowledge of the Lawes and other Sciences naturall philosophy is to be placed which is the prime and principall part of other Sciences for by the knowledge of naturall things we are instructed to observe the diversity of the actions and manners of men according to the difference of climats and various conditions of them of which any one ignorant wil be altogether unable to judge of civill and aeconomicall affaires and therefore as Mr Ployden Have the Philosophers searched so deeply into the law of nature in their lawes and writings and for the government of the people by them given precepts to follow the rule of nature and have taken nature to be as it were a foundation to all lawes Neither have the Founders of our lawes been remisse in searching out the law of nature neither were they void of the understanding of it for their lawes argue the contrary and shew that those who made them were of more great and profound judgement and as well learned in the law of nature as in all reason and in the Law of God also for nothing in our Law is ordeined contrary to nature or contrary to reason or contrary to the Law of God but according to them all Ployd 304. a. and b. And according to it hath the law established diverse grounds and maxims 1. Quae rerum natura prohibentur nulla lege confirmata sunt Reg. I. C. Marcellus Lawes which are contrary to the Law of nature lose their force and are no lawes at all Finch Nom. f. 75. Such was that of the Egyptians to turne women to Merchandise and Common wealth affaires and men to keep within doores and of the Thracians who counted idlenesse an honest thing and stealing
very commendable Ibidem Naturae vis maxima and Catiline said Natura bis maxima The force of nature is very great or more then superlatively great Ployd 309. b. and therefore all things proceeding from nature are not onely respected in Philosophy but also in our law and are of efficacy in our law and taken for a consideration sufficient Ployd 305. and accordingly in Sharingtons case f. 309. It was adjudged that the affection of Andrew Bainton for the provision to his heires males which he had engendred and the affection that he had that the land should remaine in his blood and name of Bainton and the brotherly love that he bore to his brothers were causes sufficient to make uses in the land vide ib dem So consideration of marriage and brotherly love are greater then mâ—ny or matter of recompence to raise an use without transmutation of possession because every one of them is meerely founded on the law of nature ibidem 3 9. a. If a man seised in fee of Lands holden of I. S. by fealty and ten pounds of rent and he giveth it in frank marriage to one with his daughter the father shall pay the ten pound yearely untill the fourth degree is passed and shall have nothing of the Donees for it because it was given to his daughter in marriage for her advancement and for that reason the charge is translated from the daughter to the father and the consideration of it is nature Ib. f. 305. a. If I make a contract with another that if he will take my daughter to wife that I wil give him twenty pound if he take her to wife he shall have action of debt for the twenty pound in our Law 22. E. 3. Ass P. 70. and yet I have nothing by it and if a man hath not regard to nature it shall be nudum pactum Ibid. Yet the Law hath such respect to nature and conjunction of blood as in diverse cases it matcheth necessity of blood with the consideration of profit as the sonne may maintaine his father and one brother another 19. E. 4. 5. and Brothers and Cosins shall not wage Battaile in a Writ of Right The statute which maketh it felony to receive or give meat to one which committeth felony he knowing it extendeth not to a woman that receiveth and giveth meat and drink to her husband in such case Ployd Dyer f. 300. A feoffment to the use of himselfe and after his decease to the use of Alice which he intended to marry untill the issue which he doth beget of her shall be of the age of 21. yeares and after the son commeth to such an age then to the use of his wife during her widdow hood the husband dieth without issue it was adjudged the wife shall hold the fee it being by way of use otherwise it had been by estate executed If my brother hath a suit against my Cosin and Nephew I may maintaine the cause of my Cosin though my brother be neerer 4. H. 6. 17. 14. H. 7. 2. If a man menace me that he will imprison or hurt my father or child if I make him not such an obligation and I make it I shall avoid this by duresse as if he had menaced me 15. H. 6. 17. and 21. E. 4. 13. Exception Yet a consideration of blood in a personall contract as to give money is not good Lex respicit naturae ordinem Coke com 197. a. b. The law will not suffer any one to demand any thing contrary to nature and reason As a tenant in common may have an assise for the moiety of twenty shillings and the moiety of a pound of Pepper but for a Hawk and an Horse albeit they be tenants in common they shall joyne in an assise for the law will not permit any one to make his plaint in an assise contrary to the order of nature and which by nature he cannot recover as the moiety of an horse or any other entire thing for that were a vain thing lex neminem cogit ad vana inutilia and the Law compelleth none to vaine and unprofitable things Coke com f. 9. 2. a. The law respecteth the order and course of nature as if the tenant hold by a rose or a Bushell of Roses to pay at the feast of Saint Iohn Baptist because they are flowers not to be kept therefore are they to be delivered at the time of growing and the Lord may demur to distraine till that time neither is the tenant driven by law artificially to preserve Roses for the law in these cases respecteth nature and the course of the yeare For as Littleton here saith ars imitatur naturam art doth imitate nature Ployd f. 540. b. when diverse things are done at one and the same instant and the one cannot take effect without the other the common law shal adjudge it to precede it to follow which aptly ought to precede or follow as if a disseisor maketh a Lease for yeares and then hee and the disseisee release by deed to tenant for yeares there the law shall adjudge the release of the disseisee first to take effect and then the release of the disseisor for there is no privity or estate in the Lessee upon which the release of the disseisor may enure if the release of the disseisee doth not first inure So if tenant for life maketh a Lease for yeares and he and the other in the reversion in fee confirmeth the estate of tenant for years to have and to hold to him and his heires the estate of him for life shall passe first and then he in the remainder vide ibidem Paramors case Sicut natura in suis operationibus non facit saltum ita nec lex Arist 9. de motu animalium Coke com 238. b. as nature in her operations maketh no skips so also doth not the law as the writ de ingressu super discesinam is upon a disseisin made to the demandant or some of his Ancestors of which there are four kinds the first is against the disseisor upon a disseisin done to himselfe and this is called a writ of entrie of the nature of an assise sur disseisin en le pâ—r when the heire by descent is in the per by his Ancestor or when the disseisor maketh a Feoffment in fee gift in taile or lease for life the third is entry suâ— disseisin en le per cui as where A. being the feoffee of D. the disseisor maketh a feoffment over to B. there the disseisee shall have a Writ of entry sur disseisin of lands c. in which â— had no entry but by A. to whom D. demised the same who unjustly and without judgment disseised them These are degrees which are to be observed or else the writ is abateable for as nature so the law doth nothing by skips but by degrees The fourth is the entry sur disseisin in the post which lyeth when after the
disseisin the law is removed from land to land beyond these degrees which writ is given by the statute of Marlebridge c. 18. though before at the common law in respect of such long possession the demandant was driven to his writ of right vide ibidem plura Vis unita fortior Ployd f. 307. a. united force is more strong as in Sharingtons case There are three causes premised to make and raise uses in lands the first is his affection for the provision of his males the second is his affection that the lands he had should remaine in his blood the third is his Brotherly love he bore to his brother whereas every one of them had beene sufficient to raise uses yet when all are put together they are of the greater force for forces united are more strong Conjunctio maris feminae est de jure naturae Coke l. 7. f. 13. Arist 1. Polit. Nuptias non concubitus sed consensus facit Vlpian consensus non concubitus facit matrimonium Coke com f. 33. a. In matrimony there is a conjunction both of the bodies and the mindes and in contracting matrimony the consent of the mind obtaineth the chiefe and substantiall parts and corporall copulation the second and therefore is it said that the consent and not the copulation maketh the marriage for every denomination is from the greater and a woman by the common law cannot consent before she is of the age of twelve yeares nor a Man untill the age of fourteen yeares and these are called annos nubiles because at that age either of them may disagree from a former marriage Coke ibidem for a marriage infra annos nubiles underneath the marriageable yeares is inchoate and imperfect to all purposes except her dower and accordingly was it resolved in Ambrosa Gorges case Coke l. 6. f. 40. a. Who being married and her husband dying before she was of the age of ten yeares was notwithstanding the former marriage adjudged to be in ward to the Queen because the former marriage was no marriage before consent and they could not consent ante annos nubiles for the consent and not the copulation maketh the marriage And therefore is matrimony defined by Britton to be assemblee del home feme alieur deux volunts a conjunction of a man and woman according to both their wils f. 246. And which as Bracton saith l. 1. c. 5. fit per mutuam voluntatem for their mutuall consent is the efficient and necessary cause of marriage and therefore a marriage enforced contrary to the will of either party is unnaturall and illegall as Kelway 19. H. 7. 52. b. Where the case is that Margaret the now wife of Keble brought an action of trespasse against Vernon to which the defendant said that he heretofore at the Church of S. in the said county tooke the Plaintiff to wife and there were married according to the lawes of the Church and demanded judgement if action to which the Plaintiff said that those espousalls were made by menaces and duresse of imprisonment and against the will of the said Plaintiff in another county and prayed her damages and after great debate whether the espousalls were avoidable by duresse or no Frowick said that he had seen the bookes and that it seemed cleerely that the espousals were well avoided by duresse and the replication vide ibidem plura And which also seemeth to be the resolve and determination of all nations for for it Romulus himselfe was upbraided to wit for forcing the Sabine Virgins against their wils to marry the Romans and was declared by his successors the Roman Authors to be a barbarous act and a crime equivalent to a rape as Propertius l. 2. El. 6. Tu criminis author Nutritus duro Romule lacte lupae Tu rapere intactas docuisti impune Sabinas Thou hardy Romulus nurs'd by brutish care And Wolvish milk was so fierce to dare To snatch the Sabine Virgins from their Sires And force them to the nuptiall of their friendes desires A Savage crime unpunisht And by Virgill more fully Raptas sine more Sabinas That is ravished contrary to the custome of all nations for in that age when Rome most flourished the customes of the Romans were the lawes of all nations as Claudian l. 4. Stil Armorum legumque parens quae fundit in omnes Imperium primique dedit cunabula juris Rome by the power of Armes and lawes doth sway The spacious universe and did wisely lay The Plat-forme and the grounds of law and right And therefore not long after by the Romane civill law the consent of the espoused parties was ratified by an oath which being but a contract was called sponsalia de futuro which also in our law at this day is of great force for by it a precontract is a sufficient cause of divorce a vinculo matrimonii Coke com f. 285. a. Vir uxor sunt quasi unica persona quia caro una sanguis unus Cok com f. 187. b. The husband and wire are but one person in law Littleton because they are one flesh and one blood as the Scripture saith and as the Philosopher are by nature conjoyned As if a joynt estate be made to the husband and wife and to a third person the husband and wife shall have one moiety and the third person the other moiety because the husband and wife are but one person in law so if an estate be made to the husband and wife and to two others the husband and wife shall have but the third part Lit. If an estate be made to a villaine and his wife being free and to their heires they have severall capacities the villaine to purchase for the benefit of the Lord and the wife for her owne yet if the Lord of the Villaine enter and the wife survive she shall have the whole land because there was no moieties between them 40. Ass Pl. 7. If a woman marry with her obligor the debt is extinct and she shall never have action against the Obligor because the suit against her husband by inter marriage was suspended and therefore being a personall action and suspended against one it is discharged against both 21. H. 7. 29. h. So is it If a feme sole baile goods to one and marry with the bailee they are the bailees good so it is if the wife buy goods of one 33. E. 3. If husband and wife purchase lands to them and their heires and the hsband alien the land c. she shall recover the whole in a cui in vita after his death and the warranty of one of them or his Ancestors is a bar of the whole against them both 39. H. 6. 45. 21. R. 2. Judg. 63. And for the same reason the husband cannnot enfeoff the wife but upon a feoffment made unto her by a stranger he may deliver seisin unto her by a letter of attorney for thereby he giveth nothing himselfe Perk. 40. If a
yet it is in danger of the words of the Act. In an appeale brought by the wife of the death of her husband the son being an abettor shall not render damages but shall avowe the abettment as neer in blood Cuique natuâ—ale est id quo'd procreavit tueri Ployd 304. a. As matrimony is necessary betweene man and woman and that there is a naturall desire in them and all other living creatures to procreate and relinquish a thing like unto themselves id non animi judicio not by the arbitrement of the mind nor as a thing indifferent which a man may doe or not doe but is a naturall appetite to which nature urgeth us so hath nature instilled love in the procreator to the thing procreated which urgeth him to have a care to the education of the thing procreated to provide for him all things necessary and to defend him against all perils and therefore hath the common law given to the father the custody and education of his son and if any one take him from him he shal have the writ against him Quare filium heredem suum rapuit and that law is in satisfaction of nature but in his writ he must say Cujus maritagium ad se pertinet because the marriage of his son and heire and of his daughter and heire appertaineth to him who being once married he cannot have this Writ 11. H. 4. 23. M. 33. H. 6. 55. Fulb. l. 1. 80. And if a man taketh way another mans son and heire apparent and bestoweth upon him good aparrell and the father seiseth his son he shall not be impeached for taking of the apparrell for in that he may make a good justification for the taking of the body it must needs extend to the apparrell of the body because the law considereth not bare and elementall bodies but bodies apparrelled 12. H. 4. 16. 8. E. 2. Trus. 31. 32. E. 3. Guard 32. Ibidem Amor descendit Ployd 293. b. Osbornes case it is an old saying that love descendeth which by experience is found to be more true then to ascend and for that reason the law which greatly tendreth the preservation of infants hath appropriated the custody of them and their lands in Soccage to their parents because they love their children best and in default of them to their other Ancestors more neere in blood and in naturall affection to them and that is for the profit of the infant for the guardian must keep the infant with the land and of the rest of the profits give an account to the infant and if the guardian die the executors shall not have the guard of the infant because they are voide of such naturall affection but the neerer Ancestor shall have it Quaelibet haereditas naturaliter quidem ad haeredes descendit nunquam autem naturaliter ascendit Glan l. 7. c. 1. Every inheritance doth naturally descend to the heires but never naturally ascendeth Coke l. 3. f. 4. in Ratcliffs ease of which Bracton giveth this reason quod quasi ponderosum quiddam jure naturae descendit nam omne grave fertur deorsum that as a certaine ponderous thing it by the law of nature descendeth for every heavy thing descendeth downewards to which this reason may be added that as the affection of love so doth the effects of love descend for as Aristotle the reason why parents love is so fervent and permanent to their issues is because love doth descend and their descending love appeareth in that they make provision for the present sustenance of them and future maintenance and continuance of their name and therefore as Mr. Ployden saith it is a great blessing of God upon Parents to have issue male to whom they may leave the fruits of their labours and establish their estates and inheritances in their names Ployd 305. b. to which by love and naturall instinct they are incited But on the contrary as the love and provision of children towards their Parents doth not naturally ascend for the thing procreated doth not actually provide for the procreator where it is sui juris so there estates and inheritances should not ascend and therefore as Mr. Littleton it is a maxime in our law that inheritance can lineally descend but not lineally ascend wherein the civill law unnaturally differeth from the common law for the civill law alloweth lineall ascention as well as lineall descent lineall and collaterall descent but not lineal ascention of inheritances as it doth which as Coke is one of the causes of such diversities of opinions in cases of descents in the civill law and the contrary is one of the causes of the certainty of the rules of the common law in cases of descent inheritance Coke l. 3. f 49. b. If there be father Vncle and son and the son dyeth the Vncle shall be heire to the son because inheritance cannot lineally ascend for by this maxime onely lineall ascention in the right line is prohibited and not in the collaterall Coke ib. com f. 11. b. but otherwise it is in case of purchase as if a lease bee made to the sonne the remainder to the next of blood the father in this case shall have the remainder because he is next of blood and so administration may be granted of the goods of the son or daughter to the father and mother as next of kin 5. E. 6. Coke ibidem Haeres est alter ipse filius est pars patris Arist Coke l. 3. f. 12. The heir is another son and the son is a part of the father and for that reason if a man be seised of three Acres of Land and acknowledgeth a recognisance or a statute c. and enfeoffeth A. of one Acre B. of another and the third descend to the heire in this case if execution be sued onely against the heire he shall not have contribution for the heir sitteth in the seat of his Ancestor and though the father be dead yet is he as it were not dead because he hath left his like and the heir is a second same and the son is part of the father and therefore the heire shall not have contribution against any Purchasor though in truth the purchasor came to the land without any valluable consideration for the consideration of purchase is not materiall in this case and though in the case of a recognisance statute or judgement the heire is charged as terre-tenant and not as heire 27. H. 6. Execu 135. because in either of them the heire is not bound yet hee shall not have contribution against the purchasor contrary to the opinion of Finchden in 48. E. 3. f. 5. b. for the reason abovesaid yet is the heire not charged meerely as terre-tenant for he shall have contribution against those who are heires as himselfe Popham f. 171. And for the like reason if a man bindeth him and his heires to pay a certaine sum at a day and dieth it is at the election of
husbands because it is possible for the husband to have got it and whose soever the Cow is his is the Calfe also Swinwood f. 18. And if the issue be borne within a month or day after marriage between parties of a full lawfull age the child is legitimate Coke Com. f. 244. a. And in the legall understanding of the common Law he is said to be haeres who is ex justis nuptijs procreatus borne of lawful matrimony haeres legitimus est quem nuptiae demonstrant and he is a lawfull heire whom marriage demonstrated so to be Coke ibidem f. 7. b. Coke l. 7. f. 44. a. One who is engendred in avowtry during the coverture is a mulier by the temporall and common Law though a bastard by the spirituall Law Jus sanguinis quod in legitimis successionibus spectatur ipso nativitatis tempore quaesitum est Reg. I. C. The right of blood which is regarded in lawfull successions or inheritances is found in the very time of the nativity and therefore jus primogeniturae the tight of the elder Brother-ship in the cause of inheritance is principally to be respected because it is in the eldest Son and his issue per modum substantiae and that which is in any person per modum substantiae is inseperable from him and cannot be extended to any other besides it is against the Laws of proximity of degrees that those which are in a remote degree should be preferred before those of the next degree and therefore in all common weales for the most part proximity of blood hath been preferred of which we have a notable example confirmed by the act of Lycurgus the judicious Law-giver as when Eunonus King of the Lacedaenonians had two Sons Polydectes the elder and Lycurgus the younger and Polydectes deceased leaving no Son living at the time of his death the Scepter of the Kingdome was seated in the hands of Lycurgus afterwards when Polydectes Widdow had brought forth a Son Lycurgus did willingly and peaceably yeeld to him the Scepter which act of Lycurgus agreeth fully with our Laws whereby it is ruled that if a man have a Son and Daughter and the Son purchaseth Land and dyeth the Daughter entreth and after the Father begetteth another Son of the same Wife this Son shall have the Land 19. H. 6. b and is also ratified by diverse examples in the successions of our Kings I will instance onely in one and the most illustrious one King Edward the third being deceased Richard the second the Son of his eldest Son obtained the Kingdome and was preferred before John Edmund and Thomas the sons of the same King wheras any of them was more worthy and fit for the Scepter yet is it granted that in succession of regall dignity jus primogeniturae is not constantly observed because in that case the good of the common-weale and commodity of the people is politically to be respected and as the Civilians the good estate of the Kingdome and Subjects is more to be heeded quam sangninis series then the pedigree of blood and so Solomon the younger Brother was advanced before the elder by the hand of David his Father and Roboam preferred Abias his younger Son yet this must be done cautiously and with a good conscience and intention and probably for the utility of the State otherwise it will neither please God nor man yet in the disposing of private estates the Law of Primogeniture is more strictly to be observed because by it confusion and dissention is avoyded which from the contrary doth proceed as is intimated by Coke l. 3. f. 40. b. Wherein our Law excelleth which preferreth the elder Brother and his issue before the younger Brother and his issue in case of descent and that jure sanguinis by his birth right as he is most worthy of blood and therefore as Coke in his com f. 14. a. The male and all descendant from him shall inherit before the female and among the males the eldest Brother and his posterity shall inherit Lands in Fee-simple as heire before any younger Brother or any descending from him whereas by the Civill Law the inheritance is divided among the males Lutleton l. 1. c. 1. There be three Brothers and the middle Brother purchaseth Lands in Fee simple and dyeth without issue the elder Brother shall have the Land by descent so also it is if the youngest purchaseth Lands in Fee and dyeth without issue the eldest shall have it jure sanguinis because he is the worthiest of blood Little So if a man enfeoffe another upon condition and the condition is broken and then the Feoffor dyeth without issue his wife privement ensaint and the Brother of the Feoffor enter for the condition broken and after a Son is borne he shall avoid the possession of the Uncle and may lawfully claime the inheritance 9. H. 7. 25. And 9. H. 8. 23. It is said that after two or more descents the heire afterwards born claiming by descent may enter into Land but he shall not have a Writ of account for the meane profits And though Littleton in defence of the custome of Gavelkind by which the issues may equally inherit alledgeth the reason that every Son is as great a Gentleman as the eldest Son is yet as Sr. Edward Coke com a. f. 14. saith Gentry and arms doth not descend to all the brethren alike for the eldest jure primogeniturae shall beare as a badg of his birth-right his Fathers armes without any difference because he is more worthy of blood but all the younger brethren shall give severall differences additio probat minoritatem and the addition demonstrateth and proveth the minority of the issue but by the Statute of 31. H. 8. A great part of Rent is made descendible to the eldest Son according to the course of the common Law for that by the meanes of that custome diverse antient and great families after a few descents came to very little or nothing according to the simile of the Poet In plures quoties rivos deducitur amnis Fit minor ac unda deficiente perit A Flood deduced into little streames Coke ibid. Soone groweth lesse and falleth by that meanes But in cases of purchase it is otherwise a. 15. E. 4. If a man devise land to a man and his heire and the devisee dieth having issue a daughter his wife privement enseint with a son who is afterwards borne the daughter shall enjoy the Land in perpetuum And 9. H. 6. 23. It is said that if the remainder cannot vest at any time when it falleth it shall not vest in him is borne afterwards where another hath entred before 2. Eliz. 190. Pl. 18. If a lease for life be made the remainder to the right heires of I. S. and I. S. is then alive the inheritance passeth presently out of the Lessor but cannot vest in the heire of I. S. for then living his father he is not in rerum natura for non
remainder is appointed in fee to the right heires of I. S. who dieth having a daughter which entreth after the death of tenant for life there the son after borne shall not recover the lands before vested in the daughter as purchased for thereit is a fee simple to which the son after born hath no right for the lands were in none of his Ancestors before But where the estate is an estate taile the son ought to have it per formam doni As if a feme which suffereth a recovery by covin contrary to the Statute of 11. H. 7. is defeated by entry of the daughter tenant in taile the son borne may enter and oust the daughter for that the title in taile is in him because the statute saith he shall enjoy it according to the title which is in taile and therein the common proverb is verified One shall beat the bush and the other have the bird As if a man hath land by descent of the part of the mother and maketh a feoffment on condition and dieth without issue and the heire of the part of the father entreth the heire of the part of the mother may oust him Ployd 56. b. and 57. a. In Wimbish case quod vide Infinitum injure reprebatur Coke l. 6. f. 45. What is infinite is reproved and rejected in law As if a man have a debt by simple contract and taketh an obligation for the same debt or any part of it the contract is determined 3. H. 4. 17. 11. H. 4. 9. and 9. E. 4. 50. 51. So if a man have a debt upon an obligation and by course of law hath a judgement upon it the contract by specialty is changed into a thing of record for if he that recovereth should have a new Action or a new judgement he may have infinite Actions and infinite judgements to the perpetuall charge and vexation of the defendant and he shall not have a new Action or a new judgement for what is infinite is rejected in law So upon every judgement the defendant shall be amerced and if he bee a Duke Marquess Earle Viscount or Baron he shall be amerced 100 l. and so the defendant should be infinitely amerced upon an obligation which shall be mischievous Ibid. And lib. 7. f. 45. b. It was resolved in the Court of Wards by the greater part that a Bill of reviver upon a bill of reviver shall not be admitted by reason of the infiniteness which is rejected in law And lib. 8. f. 16. b. When the first office is found against the King and the melius inquirendum also the King is bound nor to have any melius inquirendum for the same matter because there should be no end of it and that such writs might issue infinitely and infinity is condemned in law Nihil tam conveniens naturali aequitati quam voluntatem domini volentis suam rem in aliam transferre ratam haberi Bracton f. 18. God hath given to man all the land terram dedit filiis bominum So men by Gods endowment are made Lords of the land and what property a man hath in lands by law by the law of God also he hath dominion of it and therefore every man who is the lawfull owner of land may grant to what person in what manner and for what time it pleaseth him for if the land be subject to man then is it subject to his will for the will cometh from the mind which is the principall part of man because it directeth the body and all things he hath and if his land be subject to his will this his will is a sufficient consideration by which his land may pass as his will is and there is no greater consideration then the will Ployd f. 308. b. And nothing is more agreeable to naturall equity then to ratify the will of the Lord willing to transferr his substance and estate over to another And therefore at the common law the intention and will of the parties was the direction of uses for they were onely determinable and to be adjudged by the Chancellor which is the Court of conscience and equity and there is nothing more agreeable to equity then that the will of the Lord or owner and the meaning of the parties should direct the uses 31. H. 16. Tit. subpaena Fitz. 23. A man being ceste que use and having one sole daughter declared his intent and meaning to the Feoffees that after his decease his daughter should have his land and for it question was made in the Chancery whether the limitation of that use made to the daughter might be revoked and in reasoning of that case Fortescue held opinion that if ceste que use had issue a daughter and being sick declared his intention to his feoffee that his daughter shall have his land after his decease and after hee recovered his health he had issue a sonne now saith hee it is good conscience the sonne should have the Subpaena because hee is heire for conscientia dicitur a conset scio quasi simul scire cum Deo that is to know the will of God so neere as reason will and the intention of the parties is to direct the uses according to a conscionable and benigne construction Coke l. 1. f. 100. a. b. vide ibidem plura As a gift in taile may bee made upon condition that tenant in taile may alien for the profits of his issue and good and hee may alien notwithstanding the Statute of W. 2. because in that case voluntas donatoris observatur The will of the Donor is observed Coke com 224. b. If Lands be given to B. and his heires Habendum to him and the heires of his body or if given to him and the heires of his body Habendum to him and his heires he hath estate taile and a fee expectant but if Lands bee given to B. and his heires if B. have heires of his body and if he die without heires of his body that it shall revert to the Donor it is an estate taile and the reversion in the Donor for voluntas donatoris in charta doni sui manifeste expressa est observanda The will of the Donor manifestly expressed in the Charter of the gift is to be observed Coke com f. 21. a. If a common person doth without consideration give to I. S. his goods indefinitely all his goods doe pass 21. E. 4. 25. Alba of Waltams case by Brown and Genny If the King doe grant to one lands ex mero motu and though his Highnesse doth rehearse some consideration in the patent of his grant which is not true as if the consideration bee that whereas the Grantee hath done his Majesty good service on the Sea or beyond the Sea or in his Wars though the consideration bee meerely supposed and therefore no good consideration in Law yet the words ex mero motu doe make the Grant good 26 H. 8. 1. by Fitz. And if a common person doe by deed
enrolled enfeoff the King without any consideration the King shall be seised to his owne use as having such prerogative in his person that he shall not be seised to the use of any other 28. H. 8. 7. Dier Bokenghams case by Knightley Cok l. 2. f. 71. b. It is not unjust but equall that the bargain or shall annex such a condition to the State of the land as he pleaseth for cujus est dare ejus est disponere he that hath power to give hath power to dispose ibidem Coke l. 7. f. 6. Calvins case The King by his letters patents or the Parliament by thier votes may grant denizations without limitations or restraint or else limited denizations as to an alien and the heires males of his body 9. E. 4. f. 7. in Bagots case or to an alien for terme of life as to John Fenell 11. H. 6. 3. Or else upon condition whereof I have seen diverse presidents for who hath power to give hath power to dispose ibid. Modus dat domationi Fleta Ployd f. 25. a. The mannor of the gift which the donor limiteth maketh a law to the donee for though in the preamble of the Act of W. 2. there be but three estates limited to wit especiall taile franke-marriage and generall taile yet may the donor make other tailes by his limitation for his will is a law as to the taile and so heires males of the body of the donee and taile to the heires females of the body of the Donee and all other tailes are within the purview of the Act for the will of the donor is the effect of the stature and from it it followeth that the alienation of the donee shall not bind the issues nor the donor And the second wife shall not be endowed neither can the donee charge the land with a rent-charge or other encumbrance neither shall the land be forfeited for felony and all these are included in the first purview to wit that the will of the donor shall be observed and are but consequences and explanations of the first purview vide ibidem plura But if a gift bee repugnant or contrary to law Exception as a gift made upon a condition unlawfull or impossible it is void and of no effect to gain any thing by the making of it in our law As if the condition be to kill a man Ployd f. 34. b. Or if an obligation be made to save one harmeless for killing a man Ibid. f 64. b. these conditions are void So a feoffment made that the feoffee shall not alien the land is void because it is contrary to law for by the law tenant in fee-simple hath power to alien to any man for if such a condition should be good then the condition should oust him of all the power that the law hath given him which is contrary to reason Littleton The like law is upon a devise in fee upon condition that the devisee shall not alien the condition is void And so it is of a grant release or confirmation or any other conveyance whereby a fee-simple doth pass for it is absurd and repugnant to reason that he that hath no possibility to have the land revert to him should restrain his feoffee in fee-simple of all his power to alien And so it is if a man be possessed of a lease for yeares or of an horse or of any other Chattells reall or personall or give or sell his whole interest or property therein upon condition that the Donee or Vendee shall not alien the same the same is void because his whole interest and property is out of him so as hee hath no possibility of a reverter and it is against trade and traffick and bargaining and contracting betweene man and man and against reason that he should oust him of all power given him for regulariter non valei pactum de re mea non alienda a contract or condition that I shall not alien that which is my owne doth not hold and suiquum est liberis hominibus non esse liberam rerum suarum alienationem it is unjust that freemen should not have liberty to alien their owne estates But these are to be understood of conditions annexed to the grant or sale it selfe in respect of the repugnancy and not to any other collaterall thing Coke com f. 223. a. But before the statute of quia emptores terrarum A man might have made a feoffment in fee and added further that if he and his heires did alien without licence that he should pay a fine it had beene good then and then the Lord also might have restrained the alienation of the tenant by condition because the Lord had a possibility of reverter and so it is in the Kings case at this day because he may reserve a tenure to himselfe If A. be seised of black Acre in fee and B. enfeoffeth him of white Acre upon condition that A. shall not alien black Acre the condition is good for the condition is annexed to other land and ousteth not the feoffee of his power to alien the land whereof the feoffment is made and so no repugnancy to the State passed by the feoffment and so it is of gifts or sales of Chattels realls or personalls Coke ibidem But if a feoffment be made upon condition that the feoffee shall not infeoff I. S. c. This is good for he doth not restrain the feoffee of all his power and in this case if the feoffee infeoff I. N. of intent and purpose that he shall infeoff I. S. some hold that this is a breach of the condition for Quando aliquid prohibetur fieri ex directo prohibetur per obliquum for when any thing is forbidden to be done directly it is also forbidden to be done collaterally or obliquely Coke ibidem b. And a gift in taile that is made upon condition that the donee nor his heires shall not alien in fee in taile or for terme of anothers life is good to all those alienations which amount to any discontinuance of the estate taile or is against the statute of W. 2. but as to a recovery the condition is void for that is no discontinuance nor against the said statute Neither is a collaterall warranty or lineall with assets in respect of the recompence restrained by the said statute no more then a common recovery is in respect of the intended recompence Ibidem If a man make a feoffment to Baron and feme in fee upon condition they shall not alien this is good to restraine them by feoffment or alienation by deed because it is tortious but to restraine their alienation by fine is repugnant void because lawfull ibidem Voluntas reputabitur pro facto Bract. the will shall be esteemed for the deed If no place be limited where money is to be paid in the condition of a Bond and the Obligor at or after the day of payment happen in the company of the obligee and offereth
one may come to that and therefore Hill 37. H. 8. in the Star Chamber a Priest was branded with an P. and A. in the forehead and put upon the Pillory with a paper written for false accusation vide ibidem pluâ—a Volenti neque injuriam neque vim fieri Reg. I. C. Volenti non fit injuria f. 501. No injury can be done to a willing man If a Parson Emparsonee present another by it he hath disappropriated the advowson and maketh it presentable by his owne Act and therefore no injury A man shooteth giving warning to all and one will goe to the marke and is hurt he is without remedy 18. E. 4. 8. If I am bound to make an house if you prohibit me to come upon the land I may plead this bar 19. E. 4. 2. If there be Lord Mesne and Tenant and the King being Lord the mesne holdeth of the King in capite and the tenant holdeth of him in Socage if the tenant get a release of the meane or fore-judge the meane he shall now hold in capite for volenti non fit injuria and it shall be injurious to the King if he should lose his tenure in capite and should have in place of it a tenure in Socage Dav. 12. P. f. 67. a. If I exchange land with one hath a bad title which is knowne to me and if I know of a fraudulent conveyance and buy the Lands in both those cases the party shall have remedy though they be willing to the wrong Omne actum ab agentis intentione est judicandum Reg. I. C. Coke com f. 49. Affectio tua nomen imponit operi tuo every act is to be judged from the intention of the agent and every affection or intention giveth the name to thy work As if a man letteth lands c. for terme of yeares the remainder over to another for life in taile or in fee if the termor enter before Livery of Seisin made to him then the frank-tenement and the reversion is in the Lessor but if the Lessor and the Lessee come upon the ground of purpose for the lessor to make or the lessee to take livery the entry vesteth no actuall possession in him till livery be made because the purpose and intention giveth the name to the work and therefore if it be agreed between the disseisor and the disseisee that the disseisee shall release all his right upon the land this is a good release and the entry of the disseisee being for this purpose did not avoid the disseisin for his intent in this case did guide his entry to a speciall purpose Val. 19. Eliz. l. B. Coke ibidem The intention and agreement of the mindes of the parties is the onely thing that the law respecteth in contracts and such words as bewray the assent of the parties and have substance in them are sufficient Ployd f. 141. As if one make an obligation and the obligation is endorsed that the obligee doth will and grant that if the obligor shall stand to the arbitrement ordination and judgement of A. and B. that then the obligation shall be void there an exception was taken to the condition for that the words are the words of the obligee and not of the obligor but it was holden by the better opinion that the condition was good for there is sufficient substance of a condition and the intent of the parties appeareth and yet the words are not usuall for conditions for the words of the condition are the words of the obligors 21. H. 6. f. 55. So a grant of an annuity to one pro consilio impendendo is a grant conditionall for if he will not give counsell the annuity shall cease and yet there is not one word of a condition So T. 9. E. 4. f. 19. 22. where debate was for tithes betweene a Prior and another and the composition betweene them was that the Prior should have the tythes without challenge or contradiction of the other and the Prior granted to the other forty shillings yearly and by the better opinion the grant shal enure conditionally so as if the other disturbe the Prior in receiving his tithes the forty shillings shall cease If one make a Lease for yeares by deed and by the same deed covenanteth that the Lessee shall nor be impeached of wast that word Covenant made at the same time amounteth to as much as if he had said Habendum for years without impeachment of wast P. 21. H. 6. f. 7. I. S. did bind himselfe in an obligation of twenty pound and the obligation was Noverint universi per presentes me I. S. teneri obligari W. B. in twenty pound solvendum eidem I. c. and yet the obligation good and the Court held that the Count shall be made solvendum to the Plaintiff for the interest of the parties there appeareth and the certainty of the bond before shall not be taken away by the Solvendum after M. 4. E. 4. f. 23. So if one have a remainder of land in him and he granteth it to another by the name of a reversion of land that shall be a good grant for there the certainty of the land appeareth and then notwithstanding the mis-terming of the thing the law regardeth the intention of the parties and doth judge according to it So if I be bound to pay you at the feast of Saint Michael which shall be in the yeare of our Lord 1555. 20 s. And at the same feast of Saint Michael then next ensuing other 20 s. The law will adjudge the same feast to have the meaning of such or the like feast for it cannot be the same feast if it come after it so the law will take one word for another to supply the intent of the parties vide ibid. Ployd 141 b. Brownings case Carta non est nisi vestimentum donationis Bract. and the intent directeth gifts rather then the words Ployd 160. b. As if a receivor be bound in an obligation to his master to pay to him omnia recepta recipienda all things received and to be received in his office that by it he is not bound to pay all that he might receive but onely that which he shall receive indeed and so his intent shall rather be taken then the word H. 41. E. 3. f. 6. So where a man maketh a Lease of an house so as the lessee may make his profit of the houses within he cannot pull downe the houses or make wast of them for the intent was not such although the words seeme otherwise T. 9. E. 4. f. 22. And it was said to follow the words was summum jus and that Judges ought not to doe it but to follow the intent rather and Ployd f. 161. b. saith that such was the opinion of Bradwell in 14. H. 8. f. 22. That contracts shall be as it is concluded and agreed betweene the parties and as their intents may be taken and that cavillation with
not though a deed without an inrolement may pass the reversion but it was meant they should pass together if one disseise another of two Acres in Dale and the disseisee release to the Disseisor all his right in all his Lands in Dale and delivereth the release as an escrow to be delivered to the disseisor as his deed before the second of May and before that day the disseisor disseiseth him of another Acre in D. and then the releafe is delivered unto him the second day of May the right to the third Acre shall not pass because it was not his intent to release it Ployd One reciting by his Deed that whereas by prescription he hath used to finde a Chaplaine because some controversie hath growne of it granteth by the same deed to doe it this determineth not the prescription for the intent of the Deed reciting the prescription was to confirme it and not make a new grant 21. H. 7. 6. Though it be a generall rule that the words which the common people use to expresse their intent ought to be taken according to the intent and not according to the very definition in Hills and Granges case f. 170. And that generalis regula generaliter est intelligenda yet this rule is principally to be observed in cases of uses which were onely trusts and confidences between man and man Coke l. 6. f. 64. vide ibidem plura in Sir Moile Finches case And Coke l. 1. f. 100. Shelleys case we finde in diverse cases of our Books that the intention of parties is the direction of uses by a conscionable and benigne construction as if a man seised of Lands of the part of his mother maketh a feoffment in fee reserving a rent to him and his heirs by the common Law the rent shall goe to the heir of the part of the father Lit. But if a man be seised of lands of the part of the mother and maketh a Feoffment in fee to the use of him and his Heirs such use shall not goe to the heire at the common Law but in regard the Land moved from the part of the mother therfore in equity the use which is nothing else but a trust and confidence shall also goe to the heirs of the part of the mother 5. E. 4. f. 4. And though Littleton saith that a man in a Feoffment and grant shall not have a Fee-simple without these words Heirs yet if a man before the Statute of 27. H. 8. had bargained and sold his Land for mony without these words heires the bargainee had a Fee-simple because at the common Law nothing passed from the bargainer but an use which is guided by the intention of the parties which was to convey Land wholly to the bargainee for that the Law intendeth that the bargainee paid the true value of the Land for it is in equity and according to the intent of the parties the bargainee had a Fee-simple without these words heires 27. H. 8. f. 5. Coke ibidem And as Ployd f. 345. a. A fortiori the intent saith he shall be observed in wills where the words cannot be performed for Testamentum est testatio mentis but that which is other then the intention is not the testation of the minde and therefore as he saith also f. 54. b. It is the office of Judges to marshall the words of wills according to the intentions of the parties for the most part of them are made in extremity and when there is no counsell of Law ready or present and the testators themselves are not for the most part learned in the Law and are accounted inopes consilij neither have they knowledge to put words in good order and therefore the ignorance and simplicity of those which make their wills require a favorable interpretation of the words of the will according to the intent As Lands were devised to one for life the remainder for life the remainder Ecclesiae sancti Audreae in Holborne and since the death of tenants for life the Parson of the said Church sued an ex gravi querela and it was pleaded in Judgement that the remainder took no effect because the Church was not a Parson capable and upon that was a demurrer and adjudged that the devise was good and that the Parson shall have execution and yet the Parson was not named in the devise but was comprehended in it Pas 21. R. 2. If a man devise the Mannor of D. and had nothing in it at the time of making the will and that since he purchased it it shall passe by the devise for it shall be taken his intention was to purchase it and if it should not passe the will should be void to all intents Ployd f. 344. a. So if one devise Land to the wife of I. S. and I. S. dyeth and shee taketh to husband another and after the devisor dyeth shee shall have the Land and yet shee was not the wife of I. S. when the devisor dyed nor shall not take it as his wife but the intent was that shee that was the wife of I. S. at the time of the making of the Will shall have it And if a man devise Lands to Alexander Nowell Deane of Pauls and to the Chapter there and their Successors and Alexander Nowell dyeth and a new Deane is made and then the devisor dyeth the land shall vest in the new Deane and Chapter and yet it vesteth not according to the words but according to the intent for the cheife intent was to convey it unto the Deane and the Chapter and their Successors for ever and the singular person of Alexander Nowell was not the principall cause but by chance was one of the causes Ployd 344. b. If one devise by will in writing Land to one and his Heirs and then in another clause after he deviseth out of that Land a rent-charge to him and his heirs it shall be good to the one for the rent and to the other for the Land and the rent in construction of Law shall be taken to be first devised although it be last in words and so one part shall stand with the other and good sence shall be made and the intent of the testator shall be observed in both Ployd f. 541. contrary to the rule of the civill Law ubi pugnantia inter se in testamento jubentur neutrum ratum est If in the Premisses of a will one deviseth Lands to one in fee and in the end of the will he deviseth it to another in fee the latter part shall confound the former because he had last such an intent and as the last will shall repeale the former will by the same reason the last part of the will shall repeale the former part of the will which is contrary to it ibidem vide plura in Paramors case Bendloes Rep. f. 209. B. Being sick sent for a Councellor and desired him to write his last will and testament of his Lands and declared unto
suerum cum averijs Abbot Conventus renounceth all the Common which he hath used to have of his Cattle with the Cattle of the Abbot and Covent and that release of Common was there taken void because he did not shew to whom he renounced the common yet there was a full intent for he had common in the Land of the Abbots and he had intent to release it to him but for the incertainty it was void And a Lease was made to Baron and Feme and the reversion of the Land that the Baron held was granted and it was held void notwithstanding the intent because it missed of the certainty of the particular estate H. 13. E. 3. Fitz. grants 63. And so where there were Lord and tenant of three acres and the Lord granted the signiory which he had out of one Acre it was held void in 17. E. 3. notwithstanding the intent because his intent did not agree with Law and so where a man holdeth of one by Castle garder Homage and Fealty and he granteth to another all his services it was held in 31. E. 1. that the Castle-garder cannot passe because he did not grant such a Castle but reserved it and therefore he who hath not the Castle cannot have the Castle guarder so his intent in granting al the services could not make all to passe because it was not according to Law and so the Law ruleth the intent and the intent not the Law Ployd ibidem in Throckmortons case Coke l. 1. f. 84. b. A man giveth Land to M. and 1. his Sisters and to the heirs of the bodies of them lawfully begotten by which they had a joynt estate for life and severall inheritances and the Donor intending that neither of them should break the Joynture but the Survivor should have all per jus accrescendi added this clause sub hac forma that shee that should longest live should have all the Land but because his intent is contrary to Law for this cause if the Joynture be severed by fine the Survivor shall not have the part so severed by the said clause which he hath inserted of his conceit and his own imagination contrary to Law and reason ibidem But in Wills the intent shall be observed and onely thought of because the Testator had no time to order all things according to Law by presumption but is suddenly made oftentimes and so the diversity Ployd f. 162. b. And therefore Ploy f. 414. a. The intent in devises maketh estates to passe contrary to the rules of the common Law in deeds and other gifts As if I devise Land to one A. for life whereas there is not any such the remainder in fee he in the remainder shall take the Land though there be no estate precedent And 34. E. 3. one had issue a Son and Daughter and deviseth Land devisable to one for life upon condition that if the Son disturbe tenant for life or his Executors of their Administration that then the Land shall remaine to the Daughter and dyeth the Daughter after the death of the tenant for life bringeth a Formedon in remainder against the son alledgeth that the tenant had disturbed the Tenant for life and the Executors and the Tenant traversed it upon it issue joyned and the condition took the fee out of the Son and put in the Daughter by allowance in Law in performance of the intent of the Devisee though the remainder did not vest when the first estate took effect Ployd ibidem Coke com f. 322. a. b. If a man lease Lands devisable for life c. the reversion by his testament in fee c. and dyeth and then the Tenant maketh wast the Devisee shall have a writ of Wast although the Tenant never attorned because the will of the Devisor made by his will shall be performed according to the intent of the Devisor and if the Tenant will never attorne then it shall never be performed and therefore he shall have an action of wast or distraine without Attornement Littleton for it is a maxime of the common Law ultima voluntas testatoris est perimplenda secundum veram intentionem sufam Coke ibidem for if a man devise his Tenements to another by testament Habendum sibi in perpetuum and dyeth and the Devisee entreth he hath a Fee-simple causa qua supra and yet if a feoffment had been made to him by the Devisor in his life of the same Tenements Habendum sibi in perpetuum and livery and seisin upon it made he shall have an estate onely for terme of his life Littleton Ibidem Coke com f. 9. b. Though by the common Law an estate of inheritance may not passe without these words Heires yet in devise it may as if a man devise twenty acres to another and that he shall pay to the Executors for the same ten pound he hath a Fee-simple by the intent of the Devisor albeit it be not the value of the Land 21. E. 3 16. So if a man devise Lands to give or to sell or in feodo simplici or to him or his Assignes for ever in all these cases a Fee simple doth passe by the intent of the Devisor but if the devise be to a man and his Assignes without saying for ever the devisee hath but an estate for life if I devise Land to one sanguini suo it is a Fee simple but if it be semini suo it is an estate tayle ibidem Exception Coke l. 1. f. 85. 86. in Câ—rbets case It was ruled by all the Justices that such an estate which cannot by the rules of the common Law be conveyed by act executed in his life by advice of counsell learned in the Law such an estate cannot be devised by the will of man who is intended in Law to be in ops consilij as if I devise Lands to one by will in perpetuum he hath a fee for such an estate may be conveyed by estate executed but if I devise further that if the Devisee doth such an act that then another shall have his Lands to him and his Heires that is void because such limitation if it was by act executed is void for as Dyer f. 33. pl. 12. A man cannot devise an estate in fee to one and if he doe not such an act his estate shall cease and another have it for when he hath disposed the estate in fee he hath not power in the same will to devise it to another and f. 4. pl. 7. when the intent of man who maketh a testament doth not agree with the Law the intent shall be taken void as if a man devise his Land to H. in fee and that if he dye without heir that M. shall have the Land this devise is void because one Fee-simple cannot depend upon another in law the same law is if the devise be to the Abbot of Saint Peter de W. where the foundation is to the Abbot of St. Paul
upon a false consideration the heire shall not be received to aver a false consideration against his ancestor Dier Ex nudo pacto non oritur actio Ployd 305. a. and 308. b. from a bare contract or promise no action riseth for it is not much argued by the laws of England what diversity is betweene a contract and a promise and a gift for the intent of the law is to have the matter argued not the termes A Nude contract is where a man maketh a bargaine and sale of his goods or lands without any recompence appointed for it As if I say to you I sell you all my lands or all my goods and nothing is assigned that the other shall give or pay for it this is a nude contract and is void in law and the vendee cannot bring an action for them Dr. and Student c. 24. And a nude promise is when a man promiseth to give a man certaine mony at such a day or to do him certaine service and nothing is assigned for them As if I promise to give you twenty pound to make your house anew there you shall have no action against me for the 20 l. because it is a nude promise as it is affirmed by Townsend T. 17. E. 4. Ployd f. 308. b. So if a Carpenter by word covenanteth and undertaketh to make a new house and he doth not and for not making it the Plaintiff bringeth an action of covenant against the Carpenter and it doth not appeare that he had any thing for making of the house it was adjudged in 11 H. 4. f. 33. that the Plaintiff should not take any thing by his writ Ployd 309. a. And if I promise to another to keep his goods safely till such a time and after I refuse to take them no action lieth against me but if I take them and after they be lost or impaired through my negligent keeping an Action lieth Doctor and Stud. c. 24. But otherwise it is if he to whom the promise is made have a charge by reason of the promise which he hath also performed then in that case hee shall have an Action for that thing is promised As if a man give land in Frankal-moine they are bound to make prayers to God for him and in consideration of such prayers he is bound to pay to the cheife Lord all the rents and services issuing out of that land Lit. a. Frankal And in 17. E. 4. 5. It is taken by diverse that if I promise a Surgeon a certaine summe to cure such a poor man or if I promise to a labourer certaine mony to repaire such a way which is in the high way that he shall have an action of debt for it for it is a thing of charity and I merit thankes of them for it and therefore shall not be called Nudum pactum Ployd f. 306. a. If I contract with another that if he will marry my daughter that I will give him 20 l. in this case if he take her to wife he shall have an action of debt for the 20 l. 22. E. l. Assi Pl. 70. by Thorp and yet I have nothing for it and if a man hath no regard to nature it shall be nudum pactum but because my daughter is advanced by it that is a good consideration to me Ployd f. 305. a. So Dr. and Stud. c. 24. f. 104. It is a good promise because he hath quid pro quo the preferement of his Daughter for his money But if a man promise to another 20 l. with his daughter in marriage if he marry the daughter and the money be not paid he shall not have an action of debt or an action of the case at the common law but he must sue for his money in the spirituall Court for here is no good forme of contract F. n. b. f. 44. a. And as Bracton saith matrimonium est principale ejusdem juris id est jurisdictionis eâ—â—e debet accessorium matrimony is the principall and the accessory ought to be of the same jurisdiction Gardiner brought an assumpsit and declared that the Defendant in consideration that he was indebted to the Plaintiff in 10 l. for pasturing and feeding of certaine beasts in the Plaintiffs grounds and for wheat and other Marchandises had and received by the said defendant did assume to pay to the said Plaintiff the debt that he had paid Vpon issue non-assumpsit was found for the Plaintiff and upon a Writ of error in the Exchequor-chamber that there must be some certaine cause of the debt assigned for it is not sufficient to say generally he was indebted for it might be for rents upon leases or for debts upon specialties but it was adjudged certaine enough and required not so much certainty as an action of debt upon a contract Hob. rep f. 7. Wolastone brought an assumpsit against W. and declared that whereas W. promised him 30 l. in consideration that the Plaintiff on the twentieth of August 1610. had given day to the said defendant for the payment of the same money untill the ninth of October following the Defendant did assume to pay him the same ninth day and upon issue non-assumpsit it was found for the Plaintiff and damages given Hob. f. 26. Wolastons case vide ibidem L. brought an assumpsit against B. and declared that whereas the defendant had felloniously slaine one P. M. the defendant afterwards required the Plaintiff to labour and doe his endeavour to obtaine his pardon from the King whereupon the Plaintiff upon the same request did labour c. to obtaine pardon for the said defendant and afterwards fi c. in consideration of the Premisses the defendant did promise to the Plaintiff to give him a hundred pounds and that he had not c. upon non-assumpsit it is found for the Plaintiff 100 l. ibidem f. 147. vide ibid. plura B. bringeth an action of the case against C. executor of Reade and counteth that whereas he had in M. terme 14. Jac. presented an attachment of priviledge against Reade rerurn in H. terme the testator knowing of it in consideration that at his request the Plaintiff would forbeare to prosecute the said writ did promise to pay him 50 l. and then averred c. and after verdict for the Plaintiff and exceptions in arrest of judgement the Court gave sentence Bedwels case vide ibidem plura A promise made for a thing past is void as if I promise one ten pounds because he hath builded me an house an action lyeth not there and if I promise to give another 10 l. in recompence of such a trespass that he hath done him an action lieth not against him the reason is because a contract properly is where a man for his goods shal have by the assent of the other party certaine goods or some other profit at the time of the contract or after but if the thing be promised fot a cause that is past by way of a recompence
the Deed or writing it shall not bind the party that delivered it for it is at the perill of the party to whom the writing is made that the true purport effect of the writing be declared if the party that shall deliver the writing doth require it but if the party who shall deliver the writing doth not require it he shall be bound by the Deed though it shall be contrary to his meaning and it mattereth not though a meere stranger readeth the writing which is well proved by the usuall forme of pleading in such case to wit that he was a Lay-man and not lettered and that the Deed was read to him in other words c. generally without shewing by whom it was read Coke l. 2. Thorowgoods case f. 11. b. If a disseisor dye seised the Disseissee being within age Covert Baron in Prison or out of the Realme it shall be no descent to take away the entry Finch Nomot f. 26. In omnibus fere minori atati succurritur Coke l. 9. 84. In all cases for the most part there is favour shewed to them within age As In a writ of customes and services which is in the nature of a writ of right in which finall judgement shall be given against an infant who is in by descent in 6. H. 3. Tit. page 144. It is adjudged he shall have his age so in a Cessavit against an infant who hath the tenancy by descent he shall have his age though it be upon his own cesser because he cannot know what arrearages he shall tender before judgement and that also is in the nature of a writ of right for if he make not true tender he shall lose his Land 28. E. 3. 99. But in a per quae servitia against an infant who hath the tenancy by descent he shall not have his age because he hath benefit and availe over and above the Premisses and therefore is he called tenant paravaile and it is against reason that when the heire hath profit by the tenancy that he shall not pay annuall rent and it is no mischeife unto him for notwithstanding his Attornement within age he may at his full age disclaime to hold of him or to acknowledge that he holdeth of him by lesser or other services Coke ibidem And regularly it is true that an infant may doe any thing for his own advantage and not to his prejudice as to be an Executor or to purchase without the consent of any other for it is intended his benefit and at his full age he may either agree thereunto or perfect it or without any cause alledged waive or disagree to the purchase and so may his heire if he doth not agree at his full age Coke com f. 2. b. In a writ of mesne the proceedings shall not be stayed for the nonage of the infant because it is not reason that the infant shall be distrained for the services of the mesne during his nonage and shall not have remedy untill he is at full age Coke l. 9. f. 85. a. If an infant make a Feoffment in person if he dye without heire the Land shall not escheate but otherwise it is if it be by letter of Attorny Dyer f. 10. Coke l. 4. f. 125. a. An infant shall sue by procheine amy but defend by guardian Coke com f. 135. a. If an infant buyeth Lands in fee with the mony for which he did sell his own Land yet may he avoid his own alienation Doct. Stud 21. An Execution Elegit and Statute Merchant c. shall not be sued against the heire during his infancy Coke com 290. a. An infant shall avoid matters in faite either within age or of full age but matters of Record as Statutes c. acknowledged by him a fine levied by him or recovery against him by default in a reall action must be avoided by him during his minority to wit Statute by Audita querela and the fine and recovery by a writ of error because they are judiciall acts and taken by a Court or a Judge and therefore the nonage of the party to avoid the same shall be tryed by inspection of Judges and not by the Country and because his nonage must be tryed by inspection this cannot be done at his full age but if that age be inspected by the Judges and recorded that he is within age albeit he come of full age before the reversall yet may it be reversed after his full age Coke com f. 380. b. The Law doth provide for the safety of a mans or womans estate that before the age of twenty one years they cannot alien any Lands Goods or Chattells or bind themselves by deed Coke com f. 171. b. Unlesse it be for necessary meate drink and apparrell necessary physick and such other necessaries and likewise for his good teaching and instruction whereby he may profit himselfe afterwards but it must be pro necâ—ssario vestitu for convenient apparrell and not for Gold lace 11. H 7. and ought to be suitable to his calling Popham Rep. f. 152. But if he bind himselfe in an obligation or other writing with a penalty for the payment of any of these the obligation shall not bind him also all other things of necessity shall bind him as presentation to a benefice for otherwise the lapse should incurr against him Also if an infant be Executor upon payment of any debt due to the Testator he may make an acquittance and in that case a release without payment is void ibidem f. 172. a. If a man inheritor taketh wife who have issue a Son between them and the Father dyeth and the son entreth into the land and endoweth the mother and then the mother alieneth that which she hath in dower to another in fee with warranty and then dyeth and the warranty descendeth to the Son this warranty collaterall shal bar the Son Little but if the Heir be within age at the time of the descent of the warranty he may enter and avoid the estate either within age or at any time after his full age but if he within age at the time of the alienation with warranty and become of full age before the descent of the warranty the warranty shall barr him for ever Coke com f. 380. b. Though no laches shall be adjudged in an infant in case of descent as Littleton saith yet in some other cases laches shall prejudice an infant as laches shall be adjudged in an infant if he present not to a Church within six months for the Law respecteth more the priviledge of the Church that the cure be served then the priviledge of he infant so the publicK repose of the Realme shall be preferred before the priviledge of infancy in the case of a fine where the fine beginneth in the time of the Ancestor As if a fine be levied before the act of non-claime and one of full age had right at the time of the time levied and dyeth within the
yeare and the right descendeth to the heire within age he shall be bound to that yeare commenced in his Father and his nonage shall not availe him there because his Father was of full age Ployd 372. a. So non-claime of a villaine of an infant by a yeare and a day who hath fled into ancient demesne shall take away the seisure of the infant And if an infant bringeth not an appeale within a yeare and a day he is barred of his appeale for ever for the Law respecteth more liberty and life then the priviledge of infancy If the King be seised of Lands and the Land descend to the successor this shall bind an infant for that the priviledge of the infant in this case holdeth not against the King Coke com f. 246. a. Though it be regularly true that no laches shall be adjudged in infants for not entry or claime to avoid descent yet laches shall be accounted in him for not performing a condition annexed to the State of Land for the laches of an infant for not performing a condition annexed to an estate either made to his Ancestor or himselfe shall bar him of the right of the Land for ever as if either of them be enfeoffed reserving a rent and for default of payment a re-entry the laches of either of them in not paying the rent shall disinherit either of them for ever But if a man maketh a feoffment in fee to another reserving a rent and that if he pay not the rent within a month ne shal double the rent and the feoffee dyeth his heir within age and the infant payeth not the rent he shall not for this laches forse it any thing for that the infant is provided for by the Statute non current usurae contra aliquem infra aetatem existentem Merton C 31. An infant is impleadable in Law and for his contempt shall be punished as a man of full age as an outlawry returned against an infant is good and not erronious so as he hath passed the age of fourteen years 2. H. 5. Dyer 104. b. and 3 H. 6. An infant was forced to answer upon breach of a prohibition in an estreapment An infant is bound by any Statute Law if he be not expresly excepted in it as in fore-judger recovery in Cessavit and fines with proclamations Doctor Student c. 45. 147. And that if he had not been excepted in those Statutes they should have bound him an infant prayeth to be received and it is traversed he shall find sureties of the meane profits as an heire of full age Dyer 104. b. An infant under the age of fifteen cannot wage Law either for a debt or default of any reall action Office of Exec. f. 346. If an infant be garden of a prison and suffereth a prisoner to escape he shall pay the debt because the Statutes are generall and by that reason he may by a penall Statute loose his Goods Doct. and Stud. C. 46. 147. If one enter into a freehold of an infant with his consent this is a disseisin because an infant cannot consent to an entry An infant under one and twenty cannot be a Bayliff receivor for want of skill or ability nor yet sworn in any Enquest or Jury and is uncapeable of a Stewardship of the Court of a Mannor in possession or reversion or any office concerning the administration of Justice Coke com f. 3. b. 157. a. And not capeable to performe grand Serjeanty at the coronation ibidem 107. b. Actus non facit reum nisi mens fit rea Coke com f. 247. b. The act doth not make one guilty unlesse the mind be guilty and therefore if an infant under the age of discretion commit an act amounting to a Felony shall stand free from the attainder and punishment incident to a Felon but if he be of the age of discretion though he be not of full age he shall suffer as a felon and regularly the age of discretion accounted by the Law is fourteen yeares and therefore shall such an one incur the like attainder os felony as one of full age Office of Executor f. 244. and Coke com f. 247. b. But non est regula quin fallit for one of much lesse yeares having attained the maturity of discretion if he commit any felonious act shall suffer as a Felon as it was resolved in the time of King Henry the seventh in the third yeare of his reigne f. 16. touching an infant but of the age of nine yeares who killing another boy of the like age with a knife and then hiding the slaine boy and excusing the blood found upon him by saying that his nose had bled it was held by the Judges that he was to be hanged as a Felon his such nonage notwithstanding and by King Ina's Law puer decem annos natus surto conscius arguatur an infant of the age of ten years shall be attainted of theft if guilty thereof but Doctor and Student applyeth an infants discretion to the knowledge of the Law so that if an infant doe a murther at such yeares as he hath discretion to know the Law he shall have the punishment of the Law as if he were of full age and this is by a maxime in the Law for eschuing of murthers and felonies and so it is of trespasses cap. 46. f. 148. If a dumbe person bring an action he shall plead by procheine amy Finch Nomot It was a time when Idiots and mad men and such as were deafe or dumb were disabled to sue because they wanted reason and understanding but at this day they all may sue but the suite must be in their names and it shall be followed by others Coke com f. 135. b. A man that is borne dumb may make a grant by delivery of his hands or signes and a man borne deafe and dumb may make a guift if he have understanding and though it be an hard matter that a man shall have understanding without hearing yet there are diverse such persons as have understanding by their sight and a man borne dumb and blind may have understanding but a man borne dumb deafe and blind cannot have understanding Perk. f. 6. Furiosus furore suo punitur Coke com f. 247. b. The Law favoreth a mad man by reason of his disability in criminall causes and because he is amens sâ—ne mente without his mind and discretion he shall not suffer for any felonious fact for the intention is the forme of Felony that is if it be done felleo animo with a bitter and mischeivous mind and therefore is he punished onely with his madnesse there are foure sorts of mad men the first is an Idiot which from his nativity by a pertuall infirmity is non compos mentis 2. is he that by sicknesse or other accident wholly loseth his understanding 3. A Lunatick who hath sometimes his understanding and sometime hath not aliquando gaudens lucidis intervallis and is called non compos mentis
so long as he hath no understanding Lastly he that by his own vicious act for a time depriveth himselfe of his memory and understanding as he is that is drunk Coke com 147. a. Coke l. 4. 124. b. And for the three first sorts of mad men the Law is that they shall not lose their lives for felony or murder because they want reason and understand not what they doe neither can the punishment of a mad man who is deprived of reason and understanding be an example to others And therefore as Ployd f. 19. a. If a man of non sanae memoriae kill another although he hath broken the words of the Law yet he hath not broken the Law because he had not any memory nor understanding but meere ignorance which cometh unto him by the hand of God and therefore it is called unvoluntary ignorance to which the Law imputeth the act done because no default iâ— in him and therefore he shall be excused in that he is ignorant by compulsion and such an act is called and termed ex ignorantia to wit in that involuntary ignorance is the cause and God provided a speciall remedy that he who doth such a thing by such ignorance shall not be punished for it as Deut. 19. if a laborer be at labor with an hatchet and the head of the hatchet flyeth off and killeth another that such a laborer shall not be put to death because he did it by un-voluntary ignorance but if a man breake the Law by un-voluntary ignorance there he shall not be excused As if at man be drunk and kill another this is Felony and he shall be hanged for it and yet he did this by ignorance for when he was drunk he had neither memory nor understanding but because that ignorance came unto him by his own act and folly and he might resist this ignorance he shall not be priviledged by it because he is voluntarius daemon Coke com f. 247. and as Aristotle saith is worthy of double punishment because he hath dâ—ubly offended to wit in being drunke to the ill example of others and also in doing of the act and this act is called and said to be done ignoranter to wit that he is the cause of his owne ignorance and so there is a diversity of a thing done ex ignorantia ignoranter Ployd ibidem And Coke com f. 247. a. Omne crimen ebrietatis incendit detegit and what hurt or ill soever he doth in his drunkennesse doth aggravate it and that as well in case touching his life his Lands his Goods or any other thing concerneth him Coke l. 4. f. 125. Also for the same reason non compos mentis cannot commit petit treason as if a wife non compos mentis slay her husband as appeareth 12. H. 3. Tit. forfeiture 33. But in some cases non compos mentis may commit high Treason as if he slay or offer to slay the King this is high Treason for the King is caput Reipub the head and safety of the Common-wealth and from the head good health is conveyed to all and for this cause their persons are so sacred that none ought to offer them violence but he shall be reus laesae majestatis guilty of high Treason Coke l. 4. f. 124. b. And likewise for the same reason many are the priviledges which the Law giveth to one who is not compos mentis and his heires as if an idiot or non compos mentis maketh a Feoffment in person and dyeth his heire within age he shall not be in ward and if he dyeth without heire the Land shall not eschcate but if he make a Feoffment by Letter of Attorny although the Feoffor can never avoid it yet as to others in judgment of Law the State was void and therefore in such case if the heir be within age he shall be in ward and if he dyeth without heires the Land shall escheate and that is the true reason of the bookes in 7. H. 4. 5. and 7. H. 4. 12. And so is there a great diversity between an estate made by the person of a mad man and by his Attorny Coke l. 4. 125. Also an idiot in an action brought against him shall appeare in proper person and he that can plead best for him shall be admitted 33. H. 6. 18. otherwise it is of him who becometh non compos mentis for he shall appeare by his guardian if he be within age and by an Attorny if be be of full age Coke ibidem f. 124. b. So if a man of non sanae memoria â—ath cause to enter into tenements and a descent is had in his life during the time he was of non sana memoriae and then dyeth his heire may enter upon him is in by descent Littleton and though Littleton there saith that the Ancestor who had the same title could not enter during his life yet in case of a bar of his right he may As if a man of non compos mentis be disseised and the disseisor levieth a fine in this case at the common Law though the yeare and the day be passed yet he that was non compos mentis shall not be bound by it but that he might well enter Coke l. 4. f. 125. vide ibidem plura But if an Idiot or a non compos mentis by accident or qui lucidis gaudet intervallis maketh a Feoffment in fee he shall in pleading never avoid it by saying that he was an Idiot c. at the time of the Feoffment because it is a maxime in the common Law that no man of full age shall be received in any Plea by the Law to disable himselfe contrary to the opinion of some that he may avoid his own act by Entry or Plea and others that he may avoid it by Writ and not by Plea and others as Fitzherbert in his Writ of dum fuit non compos mentis that he may avoid either by Plea or by Writ but Littleton here is of opinion that neither by Plea Writ or otherwise he himselfe shall avoid it and herewith the greatest authorities of ouâ— Books doe agree and so was it resolved in Beverlyes case Coke l. 4. Though this Maxime holdeth not in criminall causes as before hath been said Coke com f. 247. Yet doth not the Law leave one who is non compos mentis destitute of remedy in this case but that upon an office found for the King the King shall avoid the Feoffment of him who is of non compos mentis for the benefit of him whose custody the Law giveth to the King and all that he hath for the King is bound by the Lawes to defend his Subjects and their Goods and Chattells Lands and Tenements as Fitzherbert saith N. B. 232. and therefore the King of right ought to have and to order him his Lands and Goods and this was by the common Law as appeareth by Britton f. 16. who writ in the fifth yeare of
Ed. 1. before the Statute de prerogativa regis which was made in the seventeenth year of E. 2. a long time after Britton writ which was but a declaration of the common Law Coke l. 4. f. 126. a. Neither doth this impugne the Maxime of the common Law for in this case he that is non compos mentis in no Plea that he pleadeth shall stultify or disable himselfe but all this shall be found by office by the inquisition and verdict of twelve men at the suite of the King who are not concluded to say the truth and such and office when it is found shall have relation a tempore nativitatis to avoid all mesne Acts made by one who is non compos mentis as Feoffments Gifts Leases Releases c. And after such office found if he be sued in an Action upon an obligation or writing which he hath made the King by his writ so long as the office be in force reciting the office shall command a Supersedeas to the Justices where the suite is commenced but if one of non compos mentis dye before office found after his death no office may be found and in this sense is the rule of Bracton true furiosus stipulari non potest nec aliquid negotium agere quia non intelligit quod agit A mad man cannot promise or contract for any thing or doe any businesse because he understandeth not what he doth but all such Acts may be avoided either by the King or his Heires Coke ibidem f. 126. a. b. With which the civilian rule accords furiosus nullum negotium contrahere potest But in case of non compos mentis the King hath not any interest in the Lunatick as he hath in the Idiot for that the Lunatick may recover the memory which he hath lost and therefore in the case of an Idiot the Law saith Rex habebit custodiom the King shall have the custody but in the case of non compos mentis Rex providebit the King shall provide one to have a care and charge that he that is non compos mentis and his family shall be maintained and that nothing shall be spoiled without taking any thing to his owne use but all to the use of the non compos mentis and his family and that he shall not cut down trees but for necessary House-boot Plow-boot and Cart-boote and to repaire ancient Pales as appeareth in the case of Dyer 25. b. In Trespasse against Homes quare clausuum fregit and did cut down Trees in Padington c. of one John Francis c. the Defendant pleaded that the said John Francis was a Lunatick by which the King seised his Lands by commission c. and by his Letters Patents granted custodiam gubernationem praedict Fr. sine computo reddendo the custody and government of the said Francis without rendring an account c. and he prayed aid of the King and upon demurrer it was denied and the diversity taken between the seiser of the Lands of a Lunatick and an Idiot for in the first case the King nor the Grantee shall not have any profit but they are bound to finde necessaries for him c. by the prerogative of the King but in the other case the King and his Grantee shall have the Lands to his own profit and Fitzberbert held that the Lunatick should have an account when he came to his good memory sed fuit negatum Ibid. f. 26. Pl. 164. But it seemeth by Coke lib. 4. f. 127. that he shal be accountable as a Bayly to him that is not compos mentis or to his Executors or Administrators And the King shal have the protection of an infant as well as of his Land F. n. b. 232. b. But the King shal not have the lands that the Idiot holdeth by copy for that is but an estate at wil by the common law and if the King should have the custody of it it should be a grand prejudice to the Lord of the Mannor and yet notwithstanding an alienation made by the Idiot of the copy-hold after Office found shall be avoided Dyer 302. Coke ibidem f. 126. b. But there are some acts done by a man of non compos mentis that shall not onely bind himselfe but his Heires and Executors also and therefore if he levy a fine or suffer a common recovery or acknowledge a Statute or Recognisance neither his Heire nor Executor shall avoid it for those are matters of record and cannot be avoided by a nude averrement of non sanae memoriae for the inconvenience that thereupon may ensue also such an averrement is against the office and dignity of a Judge for he ought not to take any cognisance of a fine or recognisance of him that is non compos mentis and therefore all acts that he maketh in Court of record shall bind himselfe and all others for ever and shall not have a releife in equity because it is against a ground and principle in Law that no man shall disable himselfe and if the Judge were not compos mentis yet all the Fines Judgements and all other Records which are before him shall be good because they are matters of Records Cbichell Copy-holds Vim vi repellere licet Coke com f. 162. It is lawfull to repell force by force and that by the Law of nature according to the civil rule adversus periculum naturalis ratio permittit se defendere naturall râ—â—son permitteth to defend himself against danger which is manifest in Beasts which though they have not the substance and reason of the Law yet have they a certaine shadow of it and which is not onely observed in Beasts but also in infants and children But yet as Coke in the same place saith must it be done with this caution moderamine inculpatae tutelae non ad sumendam vindictam sed ad propulsandam in juriam with the moderation of an unblameable defence not thereby to take revenge but to repulse the injury In trespasse of an assault and battery for Beasts taken the Defendant said that to all but the assault he was not guilty and for the assault he said that before the trespasse the Defendant was possessessed of an horse as of his proper Goods and of it was possessed till the Plaintiff took it out of his possession and the Defendant the same day and year requested it of the Plaintiff but the Plaintiff said that he would not deliver it and the Defendant said if he would not deliver the horse to him he would retake it in spite of him and presently took a staff which was lying on the ground and went towards the Plaintiff with it which is the same assault of which the Plaintiff hath conceived his Action Judgment if Action and the opinion of the Judges was that the assault was justifiable Kelloway 22. H. 7. f. 92. If two fight together on a suddaine and before a mortall wound be on either party the one
flyeth to the wall or to some other unpassable place to save his life and upon the pursuit of the other he killeth him this is man-slaughter in his own defence 3. E. 3.284 From morall Philosophy NExt in order succeeedeth morall Philosophy the exact knowledge of which as Picolonomy Inductio ad libros Civil Philos cap. 6. cannot be comprehended without the precognition of the naturall and therefore hath the precedency for the morall faculty doth instruct men to avoid vices and to cure the maladies of the mind which cannot be compleatly accomplished without the naturall contemplation of the affections of the soul it is called Ethica by the Phylosopher or institutions of manners by which the oblique manners of men are rectified and their Enormities regulated and certainly from such exorbitances of manners originally proceeded the institutions of Lawes and from whence as Doderidge all Laws are in generalty derived for in the primary age which may rather be named the Iron then the golden age when men lived like beasts Dod. English Lawyer f. 250. the one praying on the other according to the censure of the Philosophicall Poet. Quod praedae obtulerat fortuna cuique ferebat Sponte sibi quisque valere vivere doctus What fortune offered for a pray each one Layd claime to it learned to live alone And serve himselfe Then were Laws first excogitated to suppresse the barbarous Savageness of such humane beasts and to reduce them to a more civill association as the Venusine Poet rightly Jura inventa metu injusti fateare necesse est Tempora si fastosque velis evolvere mundi If we revolve the Annalls of mans time From the worlds birth we must confesse and find That Laws were founded for feare of the unjust Seeing then Laws were introduced from the depraved judgements and corrupt manners of men who will not acknowledge that the science by which they are formed and the principles deduced from it are requisite and materiall to the fundamentall knowledge of the Law From which Fountaine our Law doth draw these grounds and maximes Illud possumus quod jure possumus Reg. I.C. We can doe that which by right we can doe for as Boetius potentia non est nisi ad bonum ability and power is not but to good for the power to have liberty to doe wrong is not by such liberty augmented but diminished potentia injuriae est impotentia naturae the power to doe injury is the impotency of nature as to decay and dye is no power but in respect of the privation and diminution in the thing is rather impotency as the Angells and Saints confirmed in glory and cannot sin are more powerfull then man who through his impotency can sin So a King ruling royally and with whom whatsoever shall please him hath the power of a Law and may doe what evill he lift is more impotent then he that doth all according to the rule and square of Law and therefore doth the Law give this rule Illud Rex solum potest quod de jure potest Coke l. 3. 99. f. 123. l. 1. 11. f. 7. Solum Rex hoc non potest quod non potest injuste agere The King onely can doe that which by right he can doe and the King can onely not doe this that he cannot doe any thing unjustly as 4. E. 4. 15. the King can be no disseisor he can be no wrong doer so if the King granterh and releaseth the services to the tenant and his heires that shall not extinct the tenure in all for necessity of the tenure and the King cannot by his charter alter the Law and therefore it shall be expounded as neere to the intention of the King as may be and that is to extinguish all the services but it onely which is incident inseperably to every tenure and that is fealty for it the King cannot doe by Law Coke l. 9. f. 123. a. And Coke l. 11. f. 72. a. The King shall not be exempt by construction of Law out of the generall words of Acts made to suppresse wrong because he is the Fountaine of Justice and common right and the King being Gods Lievtenant cannot doe wrong and with it accordeth 13. E. 4. 8. in the case of Alton woods l. 1. f. 41. So Lands were given to Henry the seventh and the heires males of his body and the question was whether the King in regard that he was not expresly restrained by the Act of 13. E. 3. de donis conditionalibus post prolem masculam sussitatum might alien or no and it was adjudged he could not alien but was restrained by the said Act for it were an hard argument to grant that the Statute which restraineth men to doe wrong and evill shall permit liberty to the King to doe it Ployd f. 246. Signior Barklys case Coke ibidem vide plura Potestas regis juris est non in juriae cum sit author juris non debet inde injuriarum masci occasio unde jura mascuntur Bract. l. 2. The Kings power is of right and not injury and as he is the author of right there ought not from thence to arise occasion of injury from whence rights proceed As if one who intendeth to sell his Land and by fraude conveyed it by deed enrolled to the King to the intent to deceive the purchaser and then he selleth the Land to another for a valuable consideration maketh conveyance accordingly in this case the purchaser shal enjoy the land against the Queen by the Statute of 27. Eliz. c. 4. For though the Queen be not excepted yet the act being general made in suppressing of fraud shall bind the Queen So if tenant in tail be seised of Land the remainder over in tail or in fee and he in the remainder knowing that tenant in tail will alien the Land and by recovery bar his remainder to the intent to deprive the tenant in tail of his birth-right and power that the Law hath given him to bar the remainder and of intent and purpose to deceive the purchaser granteth his reversion to the Queen by deed enrolled and then tenant in tail for a valuable consideration alieneth the Land by common recovery and dyeth without issue the purchaser shall enjoy the Land against the Queene by the Statute of 27. Eliz. the words of which are that every conveyance c. made c. to the intent and of purpose to deceive a purchaser t. shal be deemed onely against such purchaser c. to be utterly void vide ibidem plura in Magdalen Colledges case l. 2. in Cholmlys case f. 51.52 And the King hath a prerogative above all his Subjects that where by fraude or salse suggestion he is deceived that he in that case shall avoid his owne grant jure regio 22. E. 3. 47. in the Earle of Kents case Stanf. pr. regis 84. a. As the King can neither doe himselfe injury nor others And
therefore the Law favoureth right and construeth all things according to right from whence proceedeth the ground Constructio juris non facit injuriam Coke com f. 183. a b. The construction of right or Law doth no injury As though it be a maxime in the Law that every mans grant shall by construction of Law be taken most strongly against himselfe yet is it so to be understood that no wrong be thereby done for it is another maxime in the Law that the construction of the Law doth no injury and therefore if tenant for life maketh a lease generally this shall be taken by construction of Law an estate for his own life that made the Lease for if it should be taken for the life of the Lessee it should be a wrong to him in the reversion and so it is if tenant in tail maketh a Lease generally the Law shall contrive this to be such a Lease as may be lawfully made and that is for terme of his own life for if it should be the life of the Lessee it should be a discontinuance and consequently the State which should passe by construction of Law should work a wrong Ibidem When two are in one house or tenement and one layeth claime by one title and another by another the Law shall adjudge him in possession that right hath to have the house or tenement Littleton Coke com f. 206. a. b. It is a generall rule that whensoever the words of a deed or of the parties without deed shall have a double intendement and the one standeth with Law and Right and the other is wrongfull and against Law the intendment which standeth with Law and Right shall be taken As if tenant in Fee-simple maketh a Lease of Lands to B. to have and to hold for terme of life without mentioning for whose life it shall be deemed for the life of the Lessee for it shall be taken more strongly against the Lessor for an estate of a mans owne life is higher then for the life of another but if tenant in tail maketh such a lease without expressing for whose life this shall be taken for the life of the Lessor for the reason abovesaid and also because the Law which abhorreth injury and wrong shall never so conster it as it shall work a wrong and in this case if it should be for the life of the Lessee the estate should be discontinued and a new reversion gained by wrong ibidem Where tenant in tail maketh a Lease to another for terme of life generally and after releaseth to the Lessee and his heires albeit between tenant in tail and him a Fee-simple passed It hath been adjudged that after the death of the Lessee the entry of the issue in tail was lawfull which could not be if it had been a Lease for the life of the Lessee for then by the release it had been a discontinuance executed Coke com f. 42. b. The Law more respecteth a lesser estate by right then a larger estate by wrong as if tenant for life in remainder disseâ—se tenant for life now he hath a Fee-simple but if tenant for life dyeth now is his wrongfull estate in fee by judgement in Law changed into a rightfull estate for life Coke com f. 41. c. If a man retaine a servant generally without expressing any time the Law consters it to be for one yeare according to the Statute 23. E. 3. C. 1. And for the same reason what is contrary to right and good manners is void in Law according to the rule of the Civilians Contra jus bonos more 's conventiones hominum non valent which accordeth with the ground of the common Law quod contra legem fit proinfecto habetur whatsoever is done contrary to to Law or right is accounted not done Coke l. 3. f. 74. quod vide As if a man maketh a Feoffment in fee upon condition he shall not alien this condition is repugnant and against Law and the state of the feoffee absolute Coke com f. 206. b. A Feoffment to A.B. his Heires and assignes with proviso that he shall not alien to no person is void but that he shall not alien to I.S. is good for upon the matter he hath given the Land to him and his Assignes except to I. S. Ployd f. 77. a. So if a man maketh a Feoffment in fee upon condition that the feoffee shall not take the profits this condition is repugnant and contrary to Law and the State is absolute Ibid. If a man be bound with a condition to enfeoff his wife the condition is void and against Law Ibidem A man giveth Land to two sisters and the heirs of their bodies under this forme that she which lived longest should hold the Land wholly which is void because it is contrary to Law for if the joynture be severed by fine the survivor shall not have the other part 8. Ass Pl. 33. Coke l. 1. in Corbets case So if a man maketh a Lease upon condition that if the Lessor granteth the reversion he shall have fee if the Lessor granteth the reversion by fine he shall not have fee because it is repugnant to Law 6. A. 2. Pl. 28. Pletingtons case The Testator maketh a Lease of his house and certain implements in it for years rendring Rent to him and to his Heirs and Assignes The Executors received the Rent continually after the death of the Testator The question was whether it was Assets or no and by the Judges adjudged no assets because the whole rent appertained to the heire Dier 360 b. An obligation taken by the Sheriff colore officij of any one in their custody by course of Law with a condition then for the appearance at the day mentioned in the processe is void because it is against the Statute of 23. H. 6. Coke l. 10. in Beawsages case vide ibidem plura And it is commonly holden that if the condition of a bond be against Law the bond it selfe is void Coke com 206. b. But herein the Law distinguisheth between a condition against Law for the doing of any act is malum in se and a condition against Law because it is either repugnant to the State or against some maxime or rule in Law and that common opinion is to be understood of conditions against Law for the doing of some act is malum in se As if a man be bound upon condition to kill I. S. the bond is void for an unlawfull condition is not of effect to gaine any thing by doing of it in our Law Ployd f. 34. b. But otherwise it is in a Feoffment upon condition for a Feoffment upon condition that the Feoffee shall kill I. S. the Feoffment is good and absolute and the condition void Ployd Brownings case 135. And though all Feoffments upon conditions repugnant to Law are void in bonds it is otherwise for a bond upon such conditions is good As if a Feoffee be bound in a bond that the Feoffee
and his Heires shall not alien the bond is good yet he may notwithstanding alien if he will forfeit his bond that he himselfe hath made So a bond with condition that the Feoffee shall not take the profits is good so a bond upon condition to enfeoff his wife is good though it be against a maxime in Law Coke com f. 206. And if the husband be bound to pay his wife mony the bond is good Non valet impedimentum quod de jure non sertitur effectuum Reg. I. C. Coke l. 4. 31. a. The let or impediment availeth not which taketh not his effect from the Law as if the Lord be disseised and the disseisor dyeth seised or if the Land be recovered from him by verdict or erronious judgement in these cases untill the Land is recovered or the judgment annihilated by the Law the land is not demisable and yet after the land be re-continued it is grantable againe by copy but if copy-hold lands be forfeited to the Lord or escheate and before any new grant made those lands be extended upon a Statute or Recognisance acknowledged by the Lord or if the wife of the Lord in a writ of dower hath that land assigned to her though those impediments be acts in law yet for that that those interruptions are legall the lands shall never after be granted by copy ibidem The words of an Act of Parliament must be taken in a lawfull and rightfull sense as where by the Statute of Gloucester it is forbidden that the husband shal not alien the lands he hath in right of his wife whereof no fine is levied in the Kings court those words are to be understood where no fine is lawfully levied in the Kings Court and therefore a fine levied by the husband alone is not within the meaning of that Statute for that fine should worke a wrong to the wife but a fine levied by the husband and wife is intended by the Statute and that is lawfull and worketh no wrong for generally the rule is non praestat impedimentum quod de jure non sortitur effectum so the Statute of W. 2. c. 5. Ita quod episcopus ecclesiam conferat is construed ita quod episcopus ecclesiam legitime conferat Coke com f. 361. b. Nullam iniquam in jure praesumendum Coke l. 4. f. 71. No injurious thing is to be presumed in the law for the law so abhorreth injury that it granteth writs of anticipation to prevent them quia timet because a man feareth them and that before any molestation distresse or impleading and there are six sorts of such writs first a man may have his writ of Mesne before he be distrained 2. a Warrantia Cartae before he be impleaded 3. a Monstraverunt before any distresse or vexation 4. an Audita quereta before any execution sued 5. a Curia claudenda before any default of inclosure and is a ne Injuste vexes before any distresse or molestation Coke com f. 100. a. And such an Antipathy there is between the Law and injury that no injury is to be presumed in the law and as Coke l. 10 f. 56. a. Odiosa in honesta non sunt in lege praesumenda in facto quod se habet ad bonum ad malum magis de bono quam de malo praesumendum est odious and dishonest things are not presumed to be in the law and in a deed or action which hath in it both good and evil it ought to be more presumed of the good then of the evill as there in the case of the Chancellor of Oxford it was resolved that covin and fraud shall never be intended or presumed in the law unlesse it be expresly averred and in the case of Tier and Meriell Trin. 10. Jacob. That if no fraude be found by the Jurors the Judges shall not adjudge a Feoffment fraudulent and that though the Jurors have found circumstances and presumptions to intitle the Jurors to find fraude it is but evidence to the Jury and not any matter upon which the Court may adjudge fraude and the office of the Jurors is to adjudge upon the evidence concerning matter of fact and upon it to give their verdict and not to leave matter of evidence to the Court to judge which doth not appeare to them as if A. bring an action of the case against B. upon trover and conversion of Plate and Jewells and the Defendant pleadeth not guilty now it is good evidence to prove the conversion that the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to deliver them and he refused it and by it it shall be presumed that he hath converted them to his use yet notwithstanding that is but evidence and if it be found by a speciall verdict that the Plaintiff requested them of the Defendant and he refused it that is not matter upon which the Court can adjudge any conversion for the conversion ought to alter the action of detinue into a trespasse upon the case which a denier cannot in law make for in every action of Detinue there is alledged in the count a request and a refusall yet it is good evidence and hath allwayes been allowed to prove a conversion that the Plaintiff demanded the goods and the Defendant refused to deliver them Coke l. 10. In the case of the Chancellor of Oxford vide ibidem plura Nomen non sufficit si res non sit de jure aut de facto the name of a thing is not sufficient if the matter and substance be not of right or deed Coke l. 4. f. 107. b. Pope Vrbane at the request of Ralph Baron of Greystack founded a Colledge of a Master and six Preists resident at Greystock and assigned to every one of his Preists five markes by the year besides his Bed and Chamber and the Master forty pounds by the yeare and this certified in the Book of first fruits and tenths Rectoriam Collegium of Greystock and the said Colledge was in being five years before the Act of 1. E. 6. And it was resolved by all the Judges that such a reputative Colledge was not given to the King by the Act of 1. E. 6. because it had no lawfull beginning nor the countenance of a lawfull beginning for the Pope cannot found or incorporate a Colledge within this Realme nor to assigne or license others to assigne temporall livings to it for it ought to be done by the King and no other for the name doth suffice if the matter be not of right or deed Dier 81. Quando duo jura in una persona concurrunt aequum est ac si essent in diversis Reg. I. C. Ployd f. 368. a. when two rights concur meet together in one person it is all one as if they were in severall persons As if one hath an estate for the life of A. the remainder to him for the life of B. the remainder to him for the life of C. and he is disseised and the disseisor levieth
a fine with proclamations now by the present right he hath five years by the first favant and if after these five years A. doth dye he shall have other five years for the next remainder by the second savant which giveth them as to other persons which have a future right and if after those five yeares B. doth dye he shall have other five years by the other remainder for saith he it is the text of the civil Law when two rights meet together in one person it is all one as if they were in severall persons Ployd ibidem vide ibidem plura in the Lord Zouches case Exception Coke l. 7. Calvins case f. 14. b. This rule holdeth not in personall things that is when two persons are necessarily and inevitably required by Law as in the ease of an alien borne there is for in the case of an alien borne you must of necessity have two severall legiaries to two severall persons and no man will say that now the King of England may make a League with the King of Scotland and that because in the Kings person there concur two distinct Kingdomes it is all one as if they were in severall persons vide ibidem f. 2. Coke l. 4. f. 118. a. Though a Bishop when he is translated to an Arch-Bishoprick or a Baron be created an Earle now he hath both those dignities and as it is commonly sayd when two rights concurr in one person it is all one as if they were in severall persons yet the Act of 21 H. 8. was alwayes construed strictly against Non-residence and Pluralities as a thing much prejudiciall to the service of God and the instruction of his people and therefore within that Act an Arch-Bishop shall have no more Chaplaines then as an Arch-bishop or an Earle then as an Earle for though they have diverse dignities yet is it but one and the same person to whom the attendance and service shall be made and if a Baron be made Knight of the Garter or Warden of the Cinque Ports he shall have but three Chaplaines in all Et sic de similibus quia difficile est ut unus homo vicem duorum sustineat because it is an hard thing for one man to undergoe or sustaine the Place and Office of two persons Coke l. 4. In the case of the death of one within the Verge the Coroner of the houshold of the King and the Coroner of the County shall joyne in the Inquiry and if one be Coroner of both he shall well execute this authority Quilibet potest renunciare juri pro se introducto Coke Comment f. 99. a. Every man may renounce or refuse a Law made or brought in for himselfe as a man seised of lands may at this day give the same to a Parson Bishop c. and their successors in frank-almoigne by the consent of the King and the Lords mediate and immediate of whom the Land is holden for every one may renounce a Law brought in for himselfe and f. 223. b. The Statute of 32. H. 8. giveth power to tenant in tail to make a lease for three lives or twenty one years yet if a man make a gift in tail upon condition that he shall not make a lease for three lives or twenty one years the condition is good for the Statute doth give him power to make such leases which may be restrained by condition and by his own agreement for this power is not incident to the estate but given to him collaterally by the act according to that rule in Law Quilibet potest c. Coke l. 10. f. 101. a. In the Act of 23. H. 6. c. 10. the words upon reasonable sureties of sufficient persons are added for the security of the Sheriff and therefore if he will take but one surety be it at his perill for he shall be amerced if the Defendant appeareth not and for it the Statute doth not make the obligation void in such case for the said branch which prescribeth the forme requireth that the obligation shall be made to the Sheriff himselfe c. by the name of their office and that the prisoners shall appeare in which clause no mention is made of the sureties so as the intent of the Act was that for that it was at the perill of the Sheriff to leave it to his discretion to take one or more for his indemnity and peradventure it may be better for him sometimes to take one that is sufficient then two others and though the sureties or surety have not sufficient within the same County as the Statute mentioneth yet the obligation is good enough for those words of the Act as to that point are more for counsell and direction of the Sheriff then for precept and constraint to him and that for the safety of the Sheriff for if the Defendant cannot find two sufficient sureties having sufficient within the same County the Sheriff is not bound to let him to bail and this resolution agreeth with the ancient rule to wit Quilibet potest c. An Orphant in London exhibited a bill in the Court of request against another for discovery of part of his estate Phesant prayed a prohibition upon the custome of London but it was resolved that he might sue in what Court he would and wave his priviledge there 19. C. B. R. But this case extendeth not to any thing that is against the Common-wealth or common right Coke com f. 166. a. Summum jus summa injuria Ployd 160. b. The rigor of the Law is the extremity of injury if a man make a lease of a messuage so as he may make his profit of his houses there within he cannot abate the houses or make wast of them by the opinion of the book H. 17. E. 3. f. 7. for the intent was not such though that the words seem otherwise and sayd to pursue the words is Summum jus which the Judges ought not to doe but ought rather to pursue the intent And for the same reason the Executors of Tenant for life shall have reasonable time to remove his goods after his decease and a man shall have reasonable time wherein he shall purchase a Writ of Journys accompt Finch Nomot Jus descendit non terra 20 H. 6. 5. The right descended and not the land and Coke Inst f. 345. a. b. There is a right which includeth an estate in esse in Conveyances which he in reversion and remainder hath and hath jus in re and may be granted to a stranger with attornement or released to him in possession as if Tenant in fee-sample maketh a Lease for yeares and releaseth all his right in the Land to the Lessee and his heires the whole estate in Fee-simple passeth and also the release to him in possession with the reservation of a rent is good and there is another right which is called a bare meere and naked right and jus adrem when an estate is turned to a right
by discontinuance disseisin abatement c. and of this right is the saying to be understood that the right descendeth and not the Land which may be released to him in possession and this right is also called jus proprietatis as if a man be disseised of an Acre of Land the disseisee hath jus proprietatis and the Disseisor hath jus possessionis and if the Disseisee release to the Disseisor he hath jus proprietatis possessionis Coke com 266. a. but the reservation of a Rent upon such a release is voyd as if the disseisee release to the disseisor of Land reserving a rent the reservation is voyd Coke com 144. b. Neither can a bare right a right of entry or a thing in action be granted or transferred to a stranger by the ancient maxime of the Common Law Coke com f. 166. for that thereby is avoyded great oppression injury and injustice but if a bare right happen to be forfeited to the King he may grant the same by his Prerogative Frustra est potentia quae nunquam venit in actum Vaine is the possibility which never commeth into act Coke l. 2. f. 501. There is jus proprietatis possessionis possibilitatis and the right of possibility which dependeth upon the death of a man hath a necessary and common intendment to wit necessary in regard that all the issues of Adam must dye for statutum est omnibus hominibus semel mori and common because the death may happen at such a time that the contingency may take effect and this necessary and common possibility is called potentia propinqua which may come into act and is not therefore vaine or voyd in Law as in 15 H. 7. 10. If Lands be given to a marryed man and a marryed woman and to the heires of their two bodies ingendred this is a good estate in tail for it is of necessity that death shall ensue and in common possibility that one shall dye before the other so as the marryage may ensue but in the same case there shall not be possibility upon possibility and therefore if land be given to one man and two women there the Law shall not intend that first he shall marry one and then that shee that he shall marry shall dye and that he shall espouse the other and therefore in this case they have severall inheritances at the beginning as if Land be given to two barons and their femes and the heires of their bodies engendred in this case the Law shall not expect second marriages and therefore in this case they shall have joynt estates for life and one baron and feme one moyety in tail in common with the other baron and feme of the other moyety and so severall inheritances and with it accordeth 24. E. 3. 29. for otherwise there should be possibility upon possibility and if a man give Land to baron and feme there is an apparent possibility that they shall have issue but if after they be divorced causa praecontractus so as the possibility is dissolved the Law shall never expect the second marriage for by the divorce they have but an estate of Frank-tenement 4. H. 7. 16. 17. And a woman may enfeoff a married man causa matrimonij prae locuti for it is of necessity that death shall ensue and in common possibility that the Feme of the Feoffee shall dye before the Feoffee So in the common case of a lease for life the remainder to the right heires of I. S. the remainder is good for the necessary and common intendement vide ibidem plura in Lampets case Coke l. 10. f. 50. b. For the Law respecteth the right of possibility and will have nothing to be void that by possibility may be good As a mesnalty is given in tail reserving a rent this is good for the tenancy may escheate to the donee and then the doner shall distraine for all the arrearages 1. H. 4. 2. A man hath issue a daughter and leaveth his wife privement enseint the wife may detaine the Charters of her husbands Lands from the Daughter for the possibility it may be a Son shee goeth withall 41. E. 3. 21. b. But if A. be indebted to B. in two hundred pounds and delivereth goods to him to sell to pay his debt in the best manner he can and he is proferred two hundred pounds for them and refuseth and after selleth them for an hundred pounds A. shall answer the residue of the debt notwithstanding this possibility 18. E. 4. 5. But the possibility must be propinque and a common possibility as death or dying without issue or coverture or the like but if it be a remote possibility the Law doth judge it vaine because it shall not be intended by common intendement to happen as a remainder to a corporation which is not at the time of the limitation and remainder is void though such a corporation was after erected during the particular estate for that was potentia remota 9. H. 6. 24. For as Ployd f. 345. a. b. It is a principle in Law that all gifts be it by devise or otherwise they ought to have a donee in esse and not in posse who hath capacity to take them given when it ought to vest as devise of Lands in fee and so of goods if the devise dye before the devisor neither his Heire or Executor shall gaine any thing by this Will vide ibidem plura in Brets case So if a lease be made for life the remainder to the right heires of I. S. if at the limitation of the remainder there be not any such I. S. but during the life of tenant for life I. S. is borne and dyeth his heire shall never take as it is agreed in 2. H. 7. 13. And so in 11. E. 3. 46. the case was that upon a fine levied to R. he granted and rendred the tenements to one I. and F. his wife for their lives the remainder to G. the Son of I. in tail the remainder to the right heires of I. and at the time levied I. had not any son named G. but after he had issue named G. and in praecipe against F. it was adjudged that G. should not take the remainder in tail because he was not borne at the time of the fine levied but long after by which another who was right heire of I. S. was received for when I. had not any son named G. at the time of the fine levied the law doth not expect that he shal have a Son named G. after for that is potentia remota a remote possibility But if the remainder had been limited by a generall name as to the right heirs of I. or primogenito filio such a remainder might have been good for the common possibility But if a remainder be contrary to Law the Law shall never adjudge a grant good by reason of a possibility or expectation of a thing which is contrary to Law for that is potentia
except in case where the Owner is bound to inclose 4. E. 4 19. 10. E. 4. 7. But if a man erect a wall part on my Land and part on his own if I distroy that on my Land and the rest by that meanes falleth downe it is excusable If a Feoffment be made to two joyntly one of them cannot dereigne the warranty without the other 48. E. 3. 17. Yet if a villaine and another purchase joyntly and the Lord of the villaine enter into a moyety he may dereigne the Warranty alone for therein the severance groweth by act in Law He that commeth into a Taverne and will not goe out in reasonable time or distraine for rent and killeth the distresse shall be a wrong doer ab initio 12. E. 4. 8. Because he misdemeaneth that the authority the Law giveth him Otherwise it is if I lend my horse to one to ride to York and he rideth him further yet the riding further is not unlawfull neither a generall action of Trespass lyeth against him upon the accord upon the case because he misdemeaneth but the authority that another hath given him Finch Nomot f. 47. If I be distrained and pay my rent and after am denied to have my goods delivered an action of Trespasse or detinue lyeth 21. H. 7. If I deliver a chest to one who breaketh it Trespasse lyeth 2. H. 8. If a Sheriff maketh an arrest and returneth not the Capias an action of Trespasse lyeth 8. E. 49. An executor commandeth the taking of the goods of the Testator and refuseth to prove the will a Trespasse lyeth 8. E. 4. 9. The Sheriff seiseth the goods of one outlawed and doth not charge himselfe in account the Outlawry being reversed or the party pardoned he shall have an action of Trespasse against the Sheriff 21. H. 7. 23. Injuria illata incorpus non potest remitti Reg. I. C. injury which is offered to the body cannot be remitted and the reason given by the Civilians is quia nemo membrorum suorum Dominus because no man is Lord and Master of his members but the power of them appertaine to God our Creator and the Prince our Protector which accordeth with the reason of the common Law which maintaineth as Bracton saith quod cita membra sunt in postate Regis as it is in the record of 19. E. 1. Rot. 36. vita membra sunt in manu Regis that the life and member of every Subject are under the safe-guard and protection of the King to the intent they may serve the King and their Country when occasion shall be offered Nay the Lord of a villaine for the cause aforesaid cannot maihme his villaine but the King shall punish him for mayming of his Subjects by Fine Ransome and Imprisonment untill the Fine and Ransome be paid for that hereby he hath disabled him to doe the King service Coke com f. 127. a. And therefore also doth the Law more carefully provide for the preventing and punishing of such forcible injury in particular between person and person because as Coke com f. 161. b. Max. paci sunt contraria vis injuria forcible injuries are most contrary to the quiet and repose of the Common-wealth which is the publick felicity both of Prince and people As if one doe but menace another with a weapon or staff or if he stretch out his arme or give any other token whereby his intention of striking doth appeare though never a stroake be given yet is it actionable 22. Ass Pl. 60. And upon an assault the Writ was Quare insultum fecit vulneravit maihemavit and though the injury did not appear to be a maihm yet was it allowed 43 E. 4. For the Law favoreth the Plaintiff in such Actions And though force be an enemy to peace yet is it a maxime in our Law Quod quisque in tutelam corporis sui fecerit jure fecisse videatur Fulb. l. 1. f. 91. whatsoever any one doth in defence of his body it seemeth to be done by Law according to the opinion of the Poet. Judice me fraus est concessa repellere fraudâ—m A maque in armatos sumere jura sinunt I doe conceive it a good fraud to be To repell fraud and lawfull eke for me To take up armes ' gainst those I armed see As 2. H. 4 8. Bract. If any man beat me I may lawfully beat him if I cannot escape without stâ—ips wounds or maihmes Nay 9. E 4. 3. I may beate him in defence of my goods or wife contrary to the resolve of 43. Ass 39. That it is not lawfull for me to beat him if I may escape with my life And 9. E 4. A servant may justify a battery in defence of his Master and 17. E. 4. 4. He that cometh in company of him who maketh the assault or cometh in to aid him is a principall Trespassor and if a Justice of Peace see a man doing of an assault he may presently arrest him by commandment or word to the intent that he may find surety of peace 9. E. 4. 3 And by the civill Law if any one do keep or nourish a Masty Dog Beare or Fox or some like beast which doth hurt or damnify another man he that receiveth the hurt shall recover damages against the Owner of the beast Fulb. l. 1. f. 81. And so at the common Law if a man hath a Dog which killeth Sheep and hath notice of the condition of the Dog the master shall be punished for it as may be gathered out of Dyer 28. H. 8. f. 25. Pl. 162. Otherwise if he be ignorant thereof or if it be done without the Masters incitation ibidem f. 19. And whereas in many cases that concerne Lands and Goods the Law doth deprive a man of present remedy and rather then to suffer an inconvenience turneth him over to a further remedy yet if the question be of a personall paine the Law doth give him present remedy because he holdeth no damage a sufficient remedy for a corporall injury which ground as Sir Francis Bacon ingâ—niously observeth some of the Canonists do aptly inferr out of Christs sacred mouth Amen corpus est suâ—ra vestimentum verily the body is more worth then rayment where they say vestimentum comprehendeth all outward things appertaining to a mans condition as Lands and Goods which they say are not in the same degree with that which is corporall Bacon Max. f. 30. As if a Sheriff make a false returne whereby I loose my Land yet because of the inconvenience of drawing things to delays if the Sheriffs returne should not be credited I am excluded of my averrement against it and am put to my action of deceite against the Sheriff and Summoners 5. E. 4. 80. But if the Sheriff upon a Capias returne a Cepy Corpus quod languidus est in prisona I may come in and falsify the returne of the Sheriff to save my imprisonment 3. H. 6. 3. So if a man
tenant of the Land to be summoned whereas he was not summoned and the tenant looseth by default upon the grand Cape returned the tenant may have a writ of deceit against the recoverer and against the Sheriff for his false returne F. N. B. 97. C. and may defeate the judgement and no damages shall be recovered against the Sheriff in such case onely he shall be fined 5. E. 4 4â— And if he dye his heire may have an action of deceite and restitution of the Land 8. H. 6.5 If a man bargaine with another and assume upon consideration to enfeoff him of ceraine Land and he enfeoffeth another he to whom the assumpsit was made may have an action of deceite or an action upon the case at his pleasure 3. H. 7.14 If one selleth to another a horse which he knoweth to have a secret disease in his body or selleth Corne which is full of gravell an action of deceite lyeth 20. H. 6.36 without warranty but F.N.B. 94. C. is of the contrary opinion If the Sheriff arrest the body by a Capias ad respondendum and returneth not the Writ the party shall have an action of false imprisonment Kell way f. 3. b. The Law ordaineth that he who will be sure of his goods shall buy them in Market overt and that sale shall bind all strangers as well as vendors and yet it is agreed in 33. H. 6. That sale in open Market shall not bind him who hath right to the goods if the sale be by fraud or the Vendee hath notice that the property of the goods appertaineth to another So the Law hath ordained the Court of the common Pleas as Market-overt for the assurances of Lands by fine so as he that will be assured of Land not onely against the Vendor but against all strangers it is good for him to passe it in this Market-overt by fine yet Covin and deceite shall avoid it overt by fine yet Covin and deceite shall avoid it 〈…〉 a Feoffment by Covin which amounteth to a wrong and disseisin Fine levyed by him who is particeps criminis and who had not nor pretended to have any right to the land shall not be a bar to the Lessor Coke l. 3. f. 78. Fermors Case A resignation made by an Abbot by covin shall not abate the Writ 4 E. 2. 22. A covenous Conveyance that assets shall not descend is not of force 34 E. 3. 19. 19 E. 2. 3. And 17 E. 3.59 That an estate made to the King and Letters patents granted over and all it by covin between him that granted to the King and the Patentee to make an evasion out of the Statute of Mortmaine shall not bind but shall be repealed A presentation obtained by fraud and deceit is voyd Dyer 339. b. Letters of administration obtained by fraud and covin are voyd and shall not repeale the former administration Dyer 339. a. vide Dyer 295. many Cases there put concerning covin If I sell to one cloath and warrant it to be of such a length and it is not of such a length the buyer may have an action of the case against me by vertue of the warranty although the warranty be by word and not written but if the warranty be made at some other time after the bargaine he may not have a Writ of deceit unlesse it be made by writing F. N. B. 98. k. If a man sell to one Seeds and warranteth them to be of another Countrey if they be not a Writ of deceit lyeth but if he warrant that the Horse which he selleth should go fifty miles in a day or that the Seeds shall grow it is otherwise And a Writ of deceit lyeth for selling of corrupt Victuall without warranty but not for selling of rotten Sheep though it be with warranty but to warrant a thing which is evident to sense as to be black which is blew is voyd unlesse the buyer be blind or the thing which is bought be absent 11 E. 4 7. 3 H. 4. 1. If I sell one certaine Pipes of Wine and warrant them to be good and they be corrupt the Vendee may have an action of the case against the Vendor F.N.B. 99. b. Yet according to the opinion of some an action will lye without warranty 7 H. 4. 14. But Master Fitzherbert saith that there ought to be a warranty and his taste ought to be his judge in such case and where it is with warranty the Writ must say that the Defendant at the time of the warranty made knew that the Wine which he sold was corrupt A Writ of deceit was brought for selling a certain quantity of Wooll and warranting it to be fifty sacks whereas it wanted of that measure the Defendant pleaded in bar that it was weighed before the sale and the servants of the Plaintiffe being his Factors did accept of it and carryed it beyond the Sea whereupon the Plaintiff demurred 13 H. 4. 1. Semper qui dolo fecit quominus haberet pro eo habendus est ac si habet Reg. J. C. Alwayes whosoever shall give or grant any thing by fraud whereby he may seem not to have it he is to be esteemed as if he hath it And therefore if a man by fraud make a Deed of gift of all his goods to one of his Creditors to deceive the rest the gift by the Statute of 13 Eliz. is voyd Twins case l. 3. f. 81 quod vide where you shall finde the signes and marks of fraud accurately and fully discovered And Coke l. 5. f. 60. a. b. debt against the heire upon an obligation the Defendant pleaded Riens per descent the Plaintiff replyed that he had Assets in D. c. and the Plaintiff giveth in evidence that the father dyed seised of lands in fee the Defendant sayd that he aliened before the Writ the Plaintif averred by covin and proved that it was done by fraud to defraud the Plaintiff and therefore it was resolved to be voyd by the Statute of 13 Eliz. c. 5. and that the fraud might be wel given in evidence because the Statute saith that the estate as to the Creditors shall be voyd and therefore shall be taken by favourable interpretation for to suppresse fraud and that it shall be mischeivous to the Creditors and increase maintenance and covin if the Plaintif should be driven to plead that the Feoffment was by fraud because it is commâ—nly hatched in arbore cava and so artificially covered and concealed that the party grieved hath no meanes to find and know it and therefore jâ—dgment was given for the Plaintiff viâ—â—e ibidem And Burrels case l. 6. f. 730. a. and l. 8. f 133. in Turners case So Hobart f. 72. Humbertons Case Humberton recovered a debt against T H. and dyed and upon a Scire facias against the Ter tenants the Sheriff returned J. H. Tenant of an house that was his at the time of the judgement and J. H. came in and pleaded that T. H.
by misadventure as by an Arrow at Butts this hath a pardon of course but if a man be hurt or maimed onely an Action of Trespass lyeth though it be done against the parties will and he shall be punished in the Law as grievously as if he had done it of malice Stanf. 16.6 E. 4.7 So if a Chyrurgion authorized to practise do through negligence of his cure cause the party to dye this Chyrurgion shall not be questioned for his life yet if he do onely hurt the Wound whereby the cure is cast back and death ensueth not he is subject to an Action of the Case for it Stanf. 16. So if Baron and Feme commit Felony together the Feme in regard of the subjection of her will to her husband shal neither be principal not accessary but if they joyn in committing a Trespass upon land or otherwise the Action may be brought against them both So if an Infant wanting discretion or a mad-man kill another he shall not be impeached thereof but if they do him any corpâ—rall hurt he shall be punished in Trespass 35 H. 6. 11. So in Felony if the principall dye or be pardoned the proceeding against the accessory faileth But in a Trespass if one commandeth his man to beat you and after the Battery the Servant dyeth yet you may have an Action of Trespass against the Master 17 H 4.19 Aestimatio praeteriti delicti post facta nunquam crescit Bac. Max f. 32. In penall Lawes and Facts the Law considereth the degree of the offence not as it standeth at this time when it is committed but for any circumstance or matter subsequent the Law doth not extend or amplifie the same As if a man be wounded and the Percussor is voluntarily let to go at liberty by the Goalor and after the party wounded dyeth yet it is no Felonious escape in the Goaler 11 H. 4.12 So if one conspire the death of one who after cometh to be King not being within the Statute of 25 E. 3. this is high not high Treason but otherwise it is in civill and common cases vide ibidem Plur. Ipsae etenim leges cupiunt ut jure regantur Co. l. 2. f. 25. In omnibus quidem maxime tamen in jure aequitas est Reg. I. C. In all things but especially in the Law there is equity and the Lawes themselves desire to be ruled by equity For inasmuch as no Legislators can foresee all things which may happen it was therfore convenient as Ploydon saith that that fault should be reformed by equity And is either an amplification or diminution of the Law and no part of the Law but a morall vertue which reformeth the Law for dirigens and directum are diverse things and equity is not a Law but the emendation of the Law and therefore the Lawes themselves desire to be ruled by equity As whereas the Debtor after he is become Bankrupt may prefer one and defraud others the Act of 13 Eliz. c. 7. hath appointed certain Commissioners of indifferency and credit to releive the Creditors of the Bankrupt equally and that there shall be an equall and rateable proportion observed in the distribution of the Goods of the Bankrupt among his Creditors having regard to the quantity of their severall debts so that one shall not prevent the other but all shall be in aequali jure and so we see in many cases as well at the Common Law as upon the like statutes such constructions have been made for as Cato said Ipsae etenim leges cupiunt ut jure regantur and therefore is it holden 35 H. 8. Title Testaments V. de plura in Herberts case lib. 7. Bro. 19. A man holdeth three Mannors of three severall Lords by Knights-service every Mannor being of equall value he cannot devise two Mannors and leave the third to descend according to the generality of the Acts of 32. 34. H. 8. of Wills for then it shall prejudice the other two Lords but by equall construction he cannot devise but two parts of every Mannor and so as equality shall be observed among them and so at the Common Law an equality is required as in 11 H. 7. 12. b. a man is bound in an Obligation and his Heirs and he hath Heirs and hath lands of the part of his Father and part of his Mother both the Heirs shall be equally charged vide ibidem plura Co. Com. f. 10. a. If partition be made between Parceners of lands in Fee simple and for novelty of partition one granted a rent to the other generally the Grantee shall have a Fee-simple without this word Heirs because the Grantor hath a Fee-simple in consideration whereof he granted the rent Ipsae etenim leges c. And Co. Com. f. 271. a. b. when a Feoffment is made to a future use as to the performance of his last Will the Feoffee shall be seised to the use of the Feoffor and his Heires in the mean time for the Lawes desire to be ruled by right and equity And reason would that seeing the Feoffment is made without consideration and the Feoffor hath not disposed of the profits in the mean time that by construction and intendment of Law the Feoffor ought to occupy the same in the mean time And so it is when the Feoffor disposeth the profits for a particular time in presenti the use of the Inheritance shall be to him and his Heires as a thing not disposed of Co. ibidem Co. l. 5. f. 100. a. The Commissioners of Sewers by the Statute of 6 H. 6. c. 5. and 23 H. 8. c. 5. ought to tax all equally which are in danger to be endamaged by not repairing the Banks and not him onely who hath land adjoyning to the River for otherwise the rage and force of the water may be so great as the value of the land adjoyning shall not serve to repaire the Banks and therefore the Statutes will have all who be in the same perill and are to receive commodity by it to be contributory and the statutes require equality which well standeth with the rule of equity for equitas in Bracton est quasi aequalitas and though the Owner of the Land next adjoyning to the River was bound by prescription to repaire the banks of the River yet the Commissioners ought not to charge him only with all but to take all those which have lands in danger for otherwise it may that all the country shall be surrounded before that one person onely can repaire the Banks vide ibidem plura In Fooks case Coke l 7. f. 123. b. When the King granteth any Land without the reservation of any Tenure or without any thing from thence to be rendred or the like that land by the operation of Law shall be holden of the King in Capite by the service of Chivalry according to the rate and proportion of land that affereth to one fee of Chivalry and so of more more and of lesse lesse for the
Act in Law respecteth equity and will never charge any one with more or lesse then in reason and equity it ought For as Bracton saith jus respicit aequum If two four or more being severally seised in land joyn in a Recognizance all their lands must be equally extended An house that hath Copyhold and other lands usually occupyed with it is let for yeares with the lands appertaining yet the Copyholds passe not without speciall naming for then it were a forfeiture of them for the Law construeth all things according to equity and constraineth a generall Act if there be any mischief or inconvenience in it Finch Nomot f. 54. So a Corody granted to one and his Servants to sit at his Messe he cannot bring a Servant that hath some stinking and noisome disease And if Estovers be granted out of a Mannor the Grantee shall not cut down Fruit-trees So a Common granted to one for all his Beasts he shall not have Common for Goats and Geese nor other Beasts not Commonable Finch ibidem It is no Trespasse for a man to beat his Apprentice which is but reasonable correction for equity moderateth the strictnesse of the Law Finch Nomot f. 57. No more is it to carry away a mans Wife against his will to a lawfull end as to sue a divorce against her husband or to have the Peace of him before a Justice of Peace So if the Lessor commeth upon the ground it shall be intended that he came to see if Wast were done for equity turneth all to the best and maketh every Act to be lawfull when it is indifferent whether it be lawfull or not Finch Nomot f. 57. And if the Disseisee come it shall be taken that he meant to be remitted And in an Action of Trespasse if two Issues be joyned triable in two Counties as one in London and another in Middlesex without saying which of the Issues it should try this shall be taken to try the Issue in Middlesex onely for so the Venire facias is lawfull and not in both Counties which is against Law and therefore it is a discontinuance in the City of London and no discontinuance Finch ibidem And such a desire hath the Law to be ruled by equity as that it will feigne a thing in shew and colour whereby the reall right and equity of the thing may more certainly be found according to the ground Lex fingit ubi subsistit aequitas The Law faigneth where equity subsisteth Coke l. 10. f. 90. a. As the reason why the Law will give a colour in a Writ of Entry Sur-disseisin Writ of Entry in nature of Assise Trespass c. is that the Law which preferreth and favoureth certainty as the Mother of quiet and repose to the intent that either the Court shall adjudge upon it if the Plaintiff demurr or that a certaine Issue may be taken upon a certaine point requireth that the Defendant when he pleadeth such a speciall Plea that yet notwithstanding the Plaintiff may have right the Defendant shall give colour to the Plaintiff to the end that the plea shall not amount to the generall issue and so to leave all the matter at large to the Jurors which shall be full of multiplicity and perplexity of matter and though the colour be but a fiction yet the Law feigneth where equity subsisteth So f. 40. a. Common Recoveries are fictions in Law and for the equity that in them is transacted they are not onely allowed by the Common Law for the intended recompence but warranted by statutes for their equitable use And therefore the statute of 7 H. 8. c. 1. reciteth that divers as well Nobles as Commons have suffered Recoveries against them of divers of their Mannors for the performance of their Will for assurance of Joyntures to their Wives c. The same act in approbation of common recoveries giveth remedy to such recoveries in divers cases And in Dr. Student c. 26. it is determined that common recoveries do bind as well in conscience as in Law for semper in fictione legis subsistit aequitas And by the statute of 23 Eliz. c. 4. it is provided that for the avoiding of danger to common assurances in lands and for the advancement of common recoveries that not any common recovery shall be avoided by any want of form in words and not in matter of substance vide ibidem plura in Mary Portingtons case So Co. l. 11. f. 51. a. If one disseise me and during the Disseisin he cutteth down Trees Grass or the Corn and then I re-enter I shall have an Action of Trespasse against him vi armis for the Trees Grass and Corn for after my regresse the Law as to the Disseisor and his Servants supposeth that the Frank-tenement hath alwaies continued in me but if my Disseisor make a Feoffment in fee gift in tail lease for life or yeares and after I re-enter I shall not have trespasse vi armis against them who come in by Title for this fiction in Law that the Frank-tenement hath continued alwaies in me shall not have relation to make him that cometh in by Title to be a wrong doer vi armis for in a fiction of Law alwaies equity existeth vide ibidem plura And by these cases it appeareth that equity hath a vigorous use in the exposition of the Common Law But this bright Star more cleerly shineth and sheweth forth its lustre in the construction of Statutes for as Co. Comm. f. 24. b. equity is a construction made by the Judges what cases out of the letter of the Statute yet being within the same mischief or cause of the making of the same shall be within the same remedy that the statute provideth and the reason hereof is for that Law-makers could not possibly set down all cases in expresse termes and Co. Com. f. 271. b. when Lands and Tenements are conveyed upon confidences uses and trusts if any question groweth upon them they are to be ruled and decided by the Judges of the Law for they are within the intendment and construction of the Lawes of the Realm Rhet. l. 1. c. 3. And therefore Aristotle well adviseth Legislators and Makers of Lawes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to design and determine of things and to leave as little as may be to the descretion of the Judges But as Co. lib. 6 f. 40. b. Rerum progressus ostendâ—nt multa quae initio praecaveri provideri non possint The progresse and proceeding of things do declare and shew many things which at the beginning could not be heeded or provided for and therefore is equity required to replenish and fill up those chincks and deserts which seem to be in the letter of the Law which is therefore accordingly thus defined Aequitas est verborum legis directio sufficiens cum una res solummodo cavetur verbis ut omnis alia in aequali genere iisdem caveatur verbis Equity is a sufficient direction of the words
of the Law when one thing is provided for in the words that every other thing in the like kind shall be provided for in the same words And so when the words of a Statute enact one thing they enact all other things which are in the semblable degree As whereas the Statute of 9 E. 3. c 31. ordaineth that in an Action of Debt against Executors he that commeth in by distresse shall answer the said Act shall be extended by equity to Administrators for whosoever of them commeth in first by distress shall answer by the equity of the said Act because they are in the like degree So the Statute of 4 H. 4. c. 8. giveth an especiall Assise to him who is disseised and ousted of his land by force against the Disseisor and it is enacted that he shall recover against him double damages And so it is in an Assise of Nusance to turn the course of the water from the Mills of the Plaintiff with force it was adjudged that he should recover double damages and yet he was not put out of his land neither was there a disseisin but the Nusance was to the damage of his Frank-tenement and so by the equity of the said act the Plaintiff recovered double damages because the Nusance was in the like kind So the Statute of Gleucester giveth an Action of Wast c. against him who holdeth for life or for yeares and by the equity of it a man shall have an action of Wast against him who holdeth for a yeare or for twenty weeks and yet it is out of the words of the act because it is in the like degree and the cases which are of such degree in our Law are infinite Ployd f. 165. a. And there is another sort of equity which abridgeth and taketh from the letter and is a correction of the generall words Ethie 30. l. 10. and is defined by Aristotle to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a correction of a Law wherein it is any way wanting because of the generality of it which also in our Law is of much use As when an act of Parliament is made that whosoever shall do such an act shall be a Felon and be put to death and yet a man non sarae memoriae or an Infant of tender age who hath no discretion doth it they shall not be Felons c. or if a Statute be made that all persons who shall receive or give meat or drink or other aid to one who shall do a felonious act shall be accessory to the Offence and be put to death yet if one doth such an act and commeth to his wife who knowing it receiveth him and giveth meat and drink unto him she shall not be accessory nor Felon for in the generality of the said words of the Law he of non sanae memoriae nor Infant nor a Wife shall not be included and so equity correcteth the generality of the Law in those cases and the words generall are by equity abridged so the Statute of Champerty W. 2. l. 49. Arti. super Chart. contra probatos men generally do receive Lands and Tenements while the thing is in plea yet M. 16. R. 2. accord it was said by the whole Court in a Writ of Champerty that if I bargaine any lands before any Writ brought and after the Writ purchased I deliver Seisin That the Writ of Champerty doth not lye because it shall not be intended that the Bargain was made for such cause and that by equity for when he bargained and promised the land upon just consideration before any action brought against him it was his act to perform it notwithstanding the action And Costle promoter of the King brought an action of Extortion H. 21. H. 7. 16. against an under-Sheriff grounded upon the Statute of 23 H. 6. c. 10. which ordaineth that neither the Sheriff Goaler or Ministers nor any of them by colour of their Office shall take any thing profit c. of any person for fine fee or ease of prison but for the Sheriff 20 d. the Bayliff 4 d. and the Goaler 4 d. supposing that he had taken 20 d. above the same limited upon the Statute and upon demurrer it appeared upon evidence to the Court that all under Sherifs of the same county have used from the time whereof memory doth not run to have of every prisoner in their ward for suspition of Felony when they are acquitted twenty pence called the Bar fee and the twenty pence supposed to be taken were taken from the person named in the count being acquitted for a Bar-fee and the opinion of the whole Court was that it was out of the raise of the Statute though it was within the words of the Statute for that the sum of a Bar-fee was assigned to the Sheriff at the beginning by the order and discretion of the Court in respect of his labour and charge he had with the prisoners and for his attendance and for his ministry when the prisoners are brought to their delivery and so that payment was with reason and good conscience which the intent of the makers of the act was not to take away and so equity did put an exception to the generality of that text of the Statute Law So the Statute of W. 2. c. 4. ordaineth that where a man rat or dog escapeth alive out of a Ship neither the Ship nor any thing that is within it shall be adjudged wrack but all the things shall be saved and kept by the view of the Sheriff c. in the hands of those of the Towne where the things were found so that if any one can prove that they are his within a yeare and a day they shall be restored to him and whosoever doth otherwise shall be awarded to prison and remaine at the will of the King and render damages yet if the goods within the Ship be such things as will not endure for a yeare and a day the Sheriff may sell them and deliver the mony taken for them to the Towne to answer for it and that by equity though it be against the words of the said Act. So the Act of 2. E. 6. c. 14. Which giveth to the King all Lands and Tenements by any assurance conveyance given assigned or limited to find any preacher to have continuance for ever c. if the words of that act should be taken generally they give to the King al the houses and glebe Lands of all Parsons and Vicars but equity putteth in that text the exception of Parsonages and Vicarages because it was not the intention of the makers of that Act Ployd f. 466. vide ibidem plura There is another excellent use of equity which consisteth in guiding the grounds and maxims of of things which seem to crosse and thwart one another for as Sir John Doderidge English Lawyer f. 209. it is scarcely possible to make any second rule of Law but that it shall faile in some particular
consisteth in idlenesse for idlenesse is the mother of all vices and as Coke there saith principally in young men who ought in their youth to learne profitable sciences and trades which are profitable to the weale publick of which they may reape the fruites in their old age for jeunesse oisense vilesse disettense if in our youth we be idle in our old age we shall be indigent and for that reason the common Law detesteth all Monopolies which prohibit any one to work in any Lawfull trade and that appeareth in 2. H. 5. b. A Dyer was bound that he shall not use his Diers craft for two yeares and there Hull said that the obligation was against the common Law and that by God if the Plaintiff were here he should goe to prison untill he had made fine to the King and so for the same cause if an husbandman be bound that he shall not till and sow the ground the obligation is against the common Law And therefore the act of 5. Eliz. c. 4. that prohibited any person to use or exercise any craft mistery or occupation unlesse he had been an Apprentice for seven yeares doth not make provision onely to the intent that the artificers may be skilfull but that young men shall not be idle in their youth but trained and brought up in lawfull sciences and trades and so by the same reason the common Law doth not prohibit any person to use many Arts and Misteries at his pleasure for nemo prohibitur plures negotiationes sive Artes exercere untill it was prohibited by the Act of Parliament 37. E. 3. 6. That all Artificers c. are bound every one to one mistery and that none use other mistery but that he hath chosen but because that restraint of free trade was prejudiciall to the weale publick at the next Parliament it was enacted that all people should be so free as they were before that Ordinance by which it appeareth that without Act of Parliament no man can be in any manner restrained to worke in any lawfull trade Non negligentibus sed impotentibus succurrendum Reg. I. C. Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniant Ployd f. 357. b. The Law helpeth and releiveth those are impotent not those are negligent As if you disseise me of my Land and then A. bringeth a Writ of right against you and you joyn the mise upon the meer right and you make default after the mise joyned he shall recover to him and his Heires for ever quit of you and your Heires for ever and if I doe not lay my claime within a yeare a day I am barred for ever for the Law succoureth those that are watchfull and not sleepy so as non-claime by a yeare and a day upon a recovery by default where finall judgement is given was a good Bar by the common Law 5. E. 3.222 by Hor. A descent cast during the Coverture where the wife is disseised barreth her not of her entry after her husbands death but if a feme-sole be disseised and then taketh an husband there a descent during the coverture taketh away her entry for it was her folly to take such an husband that entred not in time Littleton 95. Negligentia semper habet comitem infortunium Coke l. 8. f. 133. a. Sa. Turnors case An Executor of an Administrator ought to execute his office and administereth the goods of the dead lawfully truly and diligently Lawfully in the payment of all dueties debts and legacies in such precedency and order as they ought to be paid by the Law truly to convert nothing to his own use and ought not by any practise or devise to bar or hinder any creditor of his debt but ought truly to execute his office according to the trust reposed in him And diligently as in the case at bar for when the Administrators which had judgement for one hundred pounds for sixty pounds and the Plaintiff offered a release or to acknowledge satisfaction and he deferreth it to the intent that the Judgement shall stand in force by which the Plaintiff shall be defrauded of his due debt and the Administrators to convert the goods of the debt to their private use let the agreement be precedent before the recovery or subsequent since the recovery it is all one as to the creditor who is a third person for he is defrauded as well by the one as the other and the creditor who is a stranger shall loose his debt which is by the Law due to him and if any prejudice accreweth to the Administrators in this case it is in his own default for the Plaintiff would have released to them or acknowledged satisfaction but they defer it to the intent to bar the Plaintiff of his just and true debt and negligence hath allwayes misfortune or ill luck for her companion Ibidem Coke l. 2. f. 26. b. If a creditor upon a commission upon a Statute of Bankrupt either by obstinacy doe refuse or by carelessnesse neglect to come before the Commissioners within the time limited and to crave the benefit of the Act he looseth the benefit thereof for the Law releiveth those which are vigilant and not dormant for otherwise a debt may be concealed or a creditor may absent himselfe and void the proceedings of the Commissioners and every creditor ought to take notice of the commission it being a matter of record Coke l. 4. f. 10. b. in Bevills case it was said that the Act of 32. H. 8. c. 2. by expresse words extendeth onely to actuall possession and seisin and not to releive those which for so long time had neglected to have actuall seisin of their services and namely of suite which ought to be made twice every yeare and it was said that it was crassa supina negligentia which that Law did not intend to releive for as it is commonly said vigilantibus c. Ibidem Coke l. 4. f. 82. b. in Sir Andrew Corbets case who deviseth Lands to R. C. and others to have and to hold to them and the survivor of them untill such time that the summ of eight hundred pounds c. was received out of the issues rents c. for the preferment of his Daughters it was resolved though the Devisee had notice of the devise yet if a stranger had occupied the Land the Devisee ought to take notice at his perill for vigilantibus c. and none by the Law in such case is bound to give him notice as in the case of arbitrement 1. H. 7.5.8 E. 4.1 ibidem And this is the reason of a lapse incurring for want of presentment or of a warranty barring for lack of entry or of descents barring for want of claime and a title to tenant in courtesy is lost for lack of entry and that Statutes of limitation do bar actions One seised of Lands devisable deviseth that his Executors shall sell his Land and distribute the profits for the use of the poore and dyeth If a
making of the banks of a River to be contributory to it for Qui sentit commodum c. Coke l. 7. f. 39. b. If a man grant a Rent-charge for life out of his land and the rent is behind and the Grantor enfeoff A. and the rent is behind in his time and after A. enfeoffeth B. and the rent is behind in his time and then the Grantee dyeth the Executor shall have an action of debt against every of them for the rent behind in his time for qui sâ—ntit commodum c. and so was it holden in Ognels case l. 4. f. 49. a. 50. Barons uses f. 27. If a man bind himself and his Heires in an Obligation or do covenant in writing for him and his Heires or do grant an annuity for him and his Heirs or do make a Warranty of land binding him and his Heires to warranty in all these cases the Heir after the death of the Ancestor is by Law charged with this Obligation Covenant Annuity and Warranty yet with these three cautions 1. That the party must by speciall name bind himself and his Heires 2. That some action must be brought against the Heir whilest the land or other inheritance rested in him unaliened except the land was conveyed away by fraud and one purpose to prevent the Suit intended against him And 3. That no Heire is further to be charged then the value of the land descended unto him from the same Ancestor c. nor to be sold out-right for the debt to be kept in extent at a yearely value untill the debt or damage be run out Neverthelesse for his false plea shall he be charged of his own lands for this Deed of his Ancestor and the reason of this charge is Qui sentit commodum sentire debet incommodum onus vide ibidem plura Dilationes sunt in lege odiosae Ployd f. 75. b. Delaies are tedious in the Law and therefore doth the Law favour Assise because they are the more speedy Suits the Law hath given as the Statute of W. 2. c. 25. in its recitall saith Et quia non est aliquod breve in Cancelaria per quod quaerentes habent tam festinum remedium sicut per breve Nove disseisinae And therefore because it is the more speedy Suit the Law the more greatly favoureth it ibidem For for speed to the Plaintiff the Jurors shal have the view before appearance by the words of the Writ And though Warranties are favoured in Law yet none shall vouch in Assise any one if he be not present and that is for the speed of the Plaintiff No. Nat. br f. 178. And a protection will not defend the party against an assise but assises are accepted by the words of protection p. 2. H. 6. 42. Bâ— protection 53. And all things and pleas which go in retardation or abatement of Assises are esteemed odious and therefore exceptions which will abate other Writs shall not abate Assises if it be so that there is a Disseisor and a Tenant for it is the substance of the Suit and therefore the misnaming of one of the Defendants shall not abate the assise if there be another Disseisin and Tenant and yet the Writ was alwaies false Ploâ—d f. 98. a. b. And if the Tenant plead Joynt-tenancy with a stranger not named although the Plaintiff confesse it yet it shall not abate his assise but for it onely for the remnant the Writ and Plaint shall stand in his force and yet the Plaint was altogether false and if there be a Disseisor and Tenant for any part then it sufficeth for other verity in the Writ or Plaint the Law requireth none and to say that one named in the Writ is dead before the Writ purchased or that there was never any such in rerum natura is alone and shall be adjudged no plea in abatement of the Writ but if there be another Disseisor and a Tenant the Writ shall be good against them Ployd f 90. a. vide ibidem plura And though in actions reall as the weight of the cause requireth there are longer times given in their proceedings then in personall actions yet it appeareth by Fortescue de lib. l. A. c. 5. 3. that they are not too long nor admitted without just cause Crebro enim saith he deliberationibus iuâ—icia matur scunt sed in accelerato processu numquam And as Hobert saith f. 133. Festinatio jâ—stitiae est nâ—verca infortunii Festination of Justice is the step-mother of mischief but many times by deliberations Judgments grow to ripenesse but in over hasty processe never yet the Demandant shall come to a finall end by these actions which he shall never do by prosecution of personall actions for the tryall of a Freehold or Inheritance Co. ep ad lectorem lib. 8. And in all cases the Law favoureth speeding of mens Causes and hateth delayes as 3 H. 6. 15. b. He that pleadeth a Record in delay as to prove the Plaintiff excommunicate must have it ready to shew but otherwise it is if he plead in bar In dilatory pleas both Defendants must joyne 12 H. 7. 1. A Plea in bar that is dilatory must be good to every common intent 8 H. 7. 9. One who is in Court ready to joyn with the Defendant may do it without processe As the Vouchee the Plaintiffs Lessor being prayed in aid of when the Defendant in a Replevin avoweth upon him or the Mesne when the Lord Paramount voweth upon him But Joynder in aid cannot be by an Attorney without processe 2 H. 6. 1. b. One who is a Debtor to the King of Record in the Exchequer if he be seen in the Court may be brought in to answer 2 H. 6 4. b. An assise of Darrein presentment was brought and it was pleaded in abatement of the Writ that the same Plaintiff had brought a Quare impedit against the Defendant for the same Church and the Court was of opinion that it was a good plea for the Quare impedit is of an higher nature for the right and possession and the Statute of W. 2. l. 5. saith that it may be in the election of one to have an assise of Darrein-presentment or a Quare impedit ergo not both And it was adjudged p. 15 Jaco that one cannot have two Quare Impedits of one Church for one avoidance Hutton f. 403. When the Law giveth a man severall remedies for a thing he cannot have both of them together as Littleton saith for then he should recover one thing twice which should be a double charge and a double vexation to the Defendant Co. Com. 145. a. as if I grant by Deed a Rent-charge to another the Grantee hath election to bring a Writ of Annuity and charge the person onely to make it personall or to distrain upon the land and make it reall but he cannot have both after the Grantee hath determined his election but this determination of election must be by action in
the Law without having regard to the conclusion of the Jurors who ought not to take upon them the judgment of the Law for quod quisque novit c. Ploâ—d Câ—m Amie Townsdens case 5 H. 17. Carus case c. Coke Com. f. 3. b. If an office either of the Grant of the King or subject which concerneth the Administration proceedings or execution of Justice or the Kings revenue or the Common-wealth or the interest benefit or safety of the Subject or the like If these or any of them be granted to a man that is unexpert and hath no skill and science to exercise or execute the same the Grant is meerly void and the party disabled by Law and uncapable to take the same pro commodo regis populi for only men of skill knowledge and ability to exercise the same are capable of the same to serve the King and his people ibidem An Infant is not capable of the Office of a Stewardship of a Mannor either in possession or reversion ibid. and the Civill Law Impubes ab omnibus officiis civilibus debet abstinere Coke l. 11. f. 87. a. The case of Monopolies a Patent made to Sir Edward Bury for the making of Cards was void because he had no skill in making them though the Patent was to him and his Deputy yet if the Grantee himself be inexpert he cannot make a Deputy who is skilfull to supply his place Quia quod per me non possum nec per alium for what I cannot do by my self I cannot do by another Imperitia culpae adnumeratur Reg. s e. Imperitia maxima est mechanicorum poena Co. l. 11. f. 57. a. Ignorance and unskilfulness is accounted a fault and is the greatest punishment of Artists and Mechanicks As 7 E. 3. 65. b. If he that taketh upon him to work be unskilfull and ignorant it is sufficient punishment to him for if any man take upon him to work and doth it amiss an action of the case lyeth against him Ignorantia Juris non excusat The ignorance of the Law doth not excuse Dr. Stud. l. 2. c 46. Ignorance of the Law though it be unvincible that is to say that they have done that in them is to know the truth doth not excuse as to the Law for every man is bound at his perill to take notice what the Law of the Realm is as well the Statutes as the Common Law for all Statutes are made in Parliament and Burgesses are the representatives of the Commons and therefore is alone as if all the Commons had been there present An Infant of the years of discretion may be a Felon and a Trespasser according to the civill Rule Pupillus qui proximus est pubertati capax est furendi injuriae faciendae An Infant who is next to the age of puberty that is of fourteen years is capable of stealing and doing injury though he be ignorant of the Law but that is by the old Maxime of the Law for the eschewing of Murthers Felony and Trespasses Dr. Stud. l. 2. c. 46. vide ibid. plura Coke l. 1. f. 177. a. b. Anthony Mildmay brought an action of the case against Roger Standish because the said Robert had said and openly published that certain lands which lawfully appertained to the said Mildmay were lawfully assured for the terme of a thousand years to Ja. Talbot and Olyff his wife and that they of the interest of that term were lawfully possessed and so for slandring his estate and title shewing all in certain and how he was prejudiced by the said speaking brought his Action And Standish in his plea justified the words upon which the Plaintiff demurred and it was adjudged for the Plaintiff although de facto the said Talbot and Olife had a limitation of those lands by the Will of Sir Henry Sharington in writing for a thousand years which was the occasion that the said Standish being a man not learned in the Law affirmed and published the same yet for that he had taken upon him the knowledge of the Law and interposed himself in a matter not concerned him judgment was given against him for Ignorantia juris not excusat If the Clark mistake Debt for a Detinet in a Writ his ignorance of the Law doth not excuse 20 E. 4. 21. But the Civilians have a Rule In paenalibus judiciis aetati imprudentiae succurritur the Law doth help the party according to his age or ignorance in criminal penal causes which accordeth with the grounds of our Law as if an infant of tender years kill a man it shall not be Felony because he had no scretion or understanding and so it is if a man dedi non sanae memoriae kill another it is not homicide because he hath no memory nor understanding and this as Ploydon saith is properly said to be done ex ignorantia where unvoluntary ignorance is adjudged the cause of the act Ployd f. 19. a. Coke l. 6. f. 54. a. A Capias was awarded against a Countesse by the Court of Common Bench that the Sheriff or his Officer by his warrant without any offence may execute it for they ought not to dispute the authority of Court but they ought to execute the Writs to them directed and to it they are sworn and though it was objected that it appeared by the Capias that shee was a Countesse against whom by Law no Capias in such case lyeth ignorantia juris non excusat and principally the Sheriffs and other Ministers of Law and Justice except in some cases as in cases of contempt yet it was resolved that the Sheriff and his Ministers ought not to examine the judiciall act of the Court but they ought to execute the Writ ibidem in the Countesse of Rutlands case so Dyer fo 60. quod vide Ignorantia facti excusat Coke 2. f. 3. b. in Mansers case the ignorance of the deed excuseth as if an illeterate man be bound to seale a deed he is not tyed to doe it if not any be present to read it if required and also to expound it if it be written in Latine c for ignorantia facti non excusat quae est vel lectionis vel linguae the ignorance of the deed excuseth whether it be of reading or of the tongues Doct. and Stud. l. 2. c. 47. If a man buy an horse in open Market of him that hath no property in him not knowing but that he had right he hath good right to the horse and his ignorance shall excuse him but if he had known the seller had no right the buying in open Market had not excused him So if a man retaine another mans servant not knowing that he is retained by him the ignorance excuseth him both from the common Law and the Statute of 31. Ed. 33. and the penalty thereupon to wit paine of imprisonment if any one retaineth one servant without licence or reasonable cause and so hath the
of Magna Charta c. 11. might enter into anothers Woods and cut the Trees for reparations of Castles but by that Statute he did restrain himself so to do Ployd 3. 22. b. vide ibidem plura A Mil-stone that is lifted up to be picked and beaten cannot be distrained for it remaineth parcel of the Mill which is a thing for the Common-weale weale 14 H. 1 25. Things brought into an Inn Faire or Market shall not be distrained 22 E. 4. 49. No more shall Cloath lying in a Taylors Shop or an Horse that is a shooing shall not be distrained for the rent issuing out of the Shop Coke Com. f. 47. a. When a man and a woman are riding on a horse or Axe in a mans hand cutting of wood and the like they are for that time priviledged and cannot be distrained Valuable things shall not be distrained for rent for benefit and maintenance of Trade which by consequence are for the Common-weale and are there by authority of Law as an horse in the Hostrey nor the materials in a Weavers Shop for making of cloath nor sacks of Corn or meal in a Mill nor in a Market nor any thing distrained for damage feasant for it is in custody of the Law and the like So Beasts belonging to a Plow averia carucae shall not be distrained and no man shall be distrained for the Instruments of his Trade or profession as the Axe of a Carpenter or the Books of a Scholar whilest Goods or other Beasts may be distrained ibidem Coke l. 10. f. 139. b. An action of the case was brought against D. and counts that D. was seised of certain lands in Kent by reason of which his ancestors and all the Ter tenants from the time whence c. have made and repaired when it shall be materiall so many perches of the walls of the Sea in K. c. and for default of repairing c. the water entred and over-flowed the lands ef the Plaintiff the Defendant traversed the Prescription and it was found for the Plaintiff and that there was a default in the Wall for not repairing by which the Plaintiff recovered Damage and a Writ awarded to the Sheriff to distrain B. to repair the wall there where it was materiall Note this judgment in an action of the case and the reason is pro bono publico for Salus populi est suprema lex and therefore is that part of the judgment in this action of the case that the Defendant shall be distrained to repair the wall ibidem Publica utilitas privatorum commodis est praeferenda Reg. I. C Publicum bonum privato est praeferendum the publick utility and good is to be pâ—eferred before private gaine and profit and therefore shall be more favourably expounded by the Law then when it is onely for private Coke comm f. 181. b. As the Tenant holdeth of the Lord by fealty and one grain of wheat c. and the Lord purchaseth part the whole shall be extinct because it is entire but if an entire service be pro bono publico as Knights-service Castle-guard Cornage c. for defence of the Realm or to repair a Bridge or a way or to keep a Beacon or to keep the Kings Records or for advancement of Justice and Fence as to aid the Sheriff or to be Constable of England though the Lord purchaseth part the service remaineth and so it is pro opere devotionis pietatis for works of devotion and piety Coke comm f. 149. a. Coke l. f. 63. a. In the Chamberlain of Londons case the Inhabitants of a Village may make Ordinances or by-Lawes for the reparation of a Church or of an high-way or any such thing as is for the publick good generally and in such case the greater part shall bind all without any custome So Corporations cannot make Ordinanccs or constitution or By-lawes without custome or charter unlesse it be for things which concern the publick good as reparations of Churches common-waies or the like So in Corporations such Ordinances or Bylawes are allowed by Law which are made for the due execution of the Lawes and Statutes of this Realm and for the good or due government of the body Corporate And the Ordinance of the Mayor Aldermen and Comminalty of London that all Citizens Free-men and strangers shall not put any broad cloath to sale within the City before it be carried to Blackwell Hall to be viewed and searched so that it may appear to be vendible and that hallage be paid for it to wit 1 d. was good and allowable by Law because it was for the better execution of the Statutes made in that behalf without deceit and also that the assesment of the said peny for hallage was good and reasonable because it was pro bono publico vide ibidem plura Coke comm f. 181 b. If a Charter of Feoffment be made and a Letter of Attorney to four or three joyntly and severally to deliver Seisin two of them cannot make Livery because it is neither by the four or three joyntly nor any of them severally but if the Sheriff upon a Capias directed to him make a Warrant to foure or three joyntly and severally to arrest the Defendants two of them may arrest him because it is for the execution of Justice which is pro bono publico jura publica privato promiscue decidi non debunt and publick Lawes ought not promiscuously to be decided by the private ibidem Coke com f. 165. a. If a Castle that is used for the necessary defence of the Realm descend to two ot more Coparceners this Castle might be divided by Chambers and Rooms as other houses be but yet that it is pro bono publico defensione regni for the publick good and defence of the Realm it shall not be divided for the right of the Sword as Britton saith which suffereth not division that the force of the Realm do not fail so much but Castles of habitation for private use and that are not for the necessary defence of the Realm ought to be parted between Coparceners as other houses ib. And for the same reason a woman shal not be endowed of a Castle that is maintained for the necessary defence of the Realm because it ought not to be divided and the publick shall be preferred before the private but of a Castle that is for private use and habitation she shall be endowed Co. com f 31 b. vide ibidem plura So a protection cum clausula volumus is of two sorts the one concerneth services of War as a Kings Souldier c. the other wisdome and counsell as the Kings Ambassador and Messenger pro negotiis regni both these being for the publick good of the Realm private mens actions and suits must be suspended for a convenient time for the publick is to be put before the private but the cause of granting the protection must be expressed in the protection to the end
that it may appear to the Court that it is granted pro negotiis regni pro bono publico for the common profit of the Realm and as Britton saith for our service as to be in our force and defence of us and our people Coke comm f. 130. And it is a rule in the Civill Law which for the reasonableness of it all Nations follow Eorum qui in potestate paiâ—â—s â—unt sine voluntate ejus matrimonia jure non contrahu â—ur sed contracta non solvuntur They who under the power of their Father cannot lawfully contract Matrimony without their will and consent but being contracted are not to be dissolved Contemplatio enim utilitatis publitae privatorum commodis pâ—aefertur For the consideration of the publick good is to be preferred before private profit Fulâ— Pand. f. 28. Finis legis pax est Ployd f. 388. The Justice said that peace and concord were the end of all Lawes and for peace the Law was made And Dyer said that for peace Christ descended from Heaven on Earth and the Divine Lawes of the old and new Testament were given for peace Bacon H. 7. f. 233. And Bacon saith When Christ came into the world peace was sung and when he went â—ut of the world peace was bequeathed And Weston cited S. Aug. Concordia stat augetur respublica discordia ruil diminuitur By concord the Common weale standeth and flourisheth and by discord it is diminished runneth to ruine And Cataline said that the Charriot wherein Peace was carried was unanimity the Rector of the Charriot Love the Horses which drew it Concord and Utility and her company and consorts were Justice and Truth and Diligence and her incidents were the attainment and advancement of all Arts and Sciences and therefore peace which bringeth so many commodities ought to be preserved above all other things And Dyer said that it was one of the Atticles to which the King is sworn at his Coronation to his subjects to do that he preserve the peace for nothing of greater benefit he cannot grant to them And therefore those Lawes which bring the more peace are the more to be esteemed as the Law is touching fines which bringeth to the Possessors of Inheritances security and maketh the certainty and therefore Carus said they were the more worthy because certainty engendereth repose and incertainty contention and to avoid incertainty in Inheritances Fines were devised by the Founders of our Lawes at the beginning of Law for no point of our Law is of greater antiquity and for it Glanvill was cited by Cataline who lived in the time of Richard the first that Contingit aliquando loquelas motas in Curia domini regis per amicabiâ—em compositionem finalem concordiam te minari sed ex licentia regis vel ejus justiciariorum It happened sometimes that Libells and Suites moved in the Court of the Lord the King were ended by a loving composition and finall concord but by the licence of the King or of his Justices And Bracton therefore is it called a finall concord because finis finem litibus imponit because a fine putteth an end to all Suits vide ibidem plura And for the same reason are Recoveries advanced by the Law above all other assurances even fines themselves and as Bacon are the greatest security Purchasers have for their monies for a fine will bar the Heir entail but not the Remainder but a common Recovery barreth as well Estates taile as also all Reversions and Remainders expectant an dependant except in the Kings case where the Remainder or Reversion is in the King and then by the Statute of 34 H. 8. it barreth neither the Estate tail nor the Remainder saving where the King is the Giver of the Estate tail and leaveth the Reversion to himself Bac. Vses f. 52. 53. and Dr. Student l. 1. c. 26. And therfore by the Statute of 23 Eliz. c. 4. It s provided that for the avoiding the danger of assurances and for the advancement of common recoveries that every common recovery shall not be avoided for any want of form in words and not in matter of substance So the common Law is the preserver of peace and abhorreth all force as a capitall enemy to it and therefore is more severe against those which commit any force and subjecteth their bodies to imprisonment whereas at the common Law upon a recognizance or judgement for debts and damages a common person onely shall have execution of his Goods and Chattells and of the Corne or other present profit groweth upon the Land but it is a rule at the common Law that in all Actions Quare vi armis a Capias lyeth and where a Capias lyeth in Processe there after Judgement a Capias ad satisfaciendum lyeth which is the highest execution by which he shall loose his liberty untill he hath made satisfaction to the party and fine to the King and the King shall have a Capias pâ—o fine Coke l. 3. f. 12. a. in Herberts case vide ibidem plura And therefore all actions upon the case for corporall injuries as forcible Entries Assaults and Batteries which tend to the breach of the peace may not onely be pursued by action but Enditement and are more severely and largely taken and punished by the common Law As if foure men enter into Land and one of them entreth by force this is force in them all and may be impleaded by action or impeached by enditement 2. E. 3. 12. Communis error facit jus a common error maketh right Dr. Stud. c 26 f. 46. The Law so favoureth the publick quiet that it will permit a common error to passe for right and therefore though it be objected that common recoveries were fâ—rst had upon feyned and unlawfull ground and against the good order of conscience neverthelesse for as much as they have been used a long time so as they have been taken of diverse men that have been right well learned in manner as for Law that the buyers partly are excused so that they be not bound to restitution and therefore Ployd in Manxells case f. 2. whâ—ther a common recovery barreth an estate taile is not to be disputed because a great part of the inheritance of the Realme depend upon it So an acquittance made by a Mayor in his own name where the Towne is incorporate by the name of a Mayor Sheriff and Burgesses shall be allowed for good if there be an hundred precedents and more of like acquittances that is for common quietnesse and accordingly the Civilian Bodin saith l. 2. de repub Diuturnitas temporis efficere potest ut quod pernitioso more exemplo inveteravit potentius ipsa lege dominetur the long continuance of time may effect that what by pernitious example Custome hath grown old may rule more powerfully then the Law it selfe and therefore as learned Patricius saith Concedendum est aliquid consuetudini
Quare Impedit 54. but at this day it is remedied by the act 1 E. 3 c. 12. by which it is declared that because that many people may be grieved for it that Lands and Tenements held in chief of the King as all those which hold by grand Serjanty are and alien without leave have been held as forfeited hereafter in such case let a reasonable fine be taken So since that Statute at all times when Lands holden by grand Serjanty have been aliened without licence a fine hath been taken and no seisure ever made for the forfeiture and therefore no forfeiture to be taken for Custome is the best Interpreter of the Law vide etiam L. 10. f. 70. b. Consuctudo manerii est observanda Co. com f. 63. a. consuetudo loci est observanda Brac. l. 2. f. 76. l. 4. f. 28. The custome of the Mannor and the custome of the place is to be observed for there are different customes in many Mannors and places and the customes of one Mannor in some particulars commonly varieth from another And these diversities of customes have grown by reason of the severall Nations who have had government over this Kingdome Britans Romans Saxons Danes Normans which have left part of their Language and part of their usage which difference of usage and custome is to be observed in every place and Mannor for what a Copyholder may or ought to do or not to do the custome of the Mannor must direct it and if there be no custome to the contrary wast either premissive or voluntary of a Copyholder is a forfeiture of his Copyhold Co com f. 63. a. If a Copyholder for life surrender to another in fee it is no forfeiture for that passeth by surrender to the Lord and not by Livery And Copyhold Estates shall not have the collaterall qualities that the estates of the common Law have without especiall custome for the custome of the Mannor is to be observed Coke l. 1. f. 22. a. 23. a. vide ibidem plura f. 28. b. Coke l. 6. f. 67. a. In a common recovery which is had by agreement and consent of parties of acres of land the acres shall be accounted according to the customable and usuall measure of the Country and not according to the Statute De terris mensurandis made in the 33 of Ed. 1. Sir John Buntings case 1 Eliz. So if a man bargain and sell so many acres of wood they shall be measured according to the usage of the Country and that is according to twenty foot to the Rod and not according to the said act for the custome of tho place is to be observed 47 E. 3. 18. Coke l 10. 140. a in Kighleys case It was resolved cleerly that the severall Commissioners of Sewers throughout England are not bound to pursue the Lawes and Customes of Romney Marsh but in case where any particular place within their Commission have such Lawes and Customes as Romney Marsh hath there they may pursue them for the custome of the place is to be observed Consuetudo vincit communem legem coke l. 4. f. 21. Custome overcometh and mastereth the common Law and will not alwaies be ruled by its grounds for a custome and usage of time whereof the memory of man runneth not to the contrary may create and consolidate Inheritances Coke comm f. 185. b. If a man be seised of an house and possessed of divers Heir Looms that by custome have gone with the house from Heir to Heir and by his Will deviseth away the Heir-looms this devise is void for the Wil taketh effect after his death and by his death the Heir looms by ancient custome are vested in the Heir and the Law preferreth the custome before the devise 1 H 5 Executors 108. And so it is if the Lord ought to have an Heriot when his Tenant dieth and the Tenant deviseth all his goods yet the Lord â—â—all have his Heriot for the reason aforesaid And it hath been anciently said that an Heriot shall be paid before a Mortuary wherein the Lord is preferred because the Tenure is in him Co. ibidem Ployd f. 36. b. Whereas the Statute of 1 R. 2. c. 12. doth ordain that the Warden of the Fleet shall not suffer any one who is in execution to go out of Prison by main-prize bail or baston yet it is taken by equity of the said Statute thâ—t if any other Goaler who lets such a one in execution to go out of prison with mainprize bail or baston that it shall be said to be an escape But notwithstanding that it extendeth to all other Goalers so fully as though it had been expressed by plain words yet those of London use to let such go at large with baston in any place within their jurisdiction and shall not be judged an escape in them and the reason of that is not because the statute in equity doth not extend to them but the reason of it is their prescription in that point and all their customes and prescriptions are confirmed by the Statutes by which they may prescribe against the equity and words of the statute which are contrary to their customs and prescriptions as against the statute of Silva caedua and to hold Leet at other times then the statute appointeth and such others ibidem Obtemporandum est rationabili consuetudini tanquam legi coke l. 4. 38. b. Littleton Sect. 170. consuetudo ex certa causa ratienabili usitata privat communem legem We ought to obey a reasonable custom as a Law and a custom used upon a certain reasonable cause depriveth or over cometh the common Law but a custome introduced against reason is rather an usurpation then a custome coke comm f. 113. a. and it is a Maxime in our Law that all customs and prescriptions which be against reason are void coke comm f. 140. a. As if the Lord of a Mannor prescribe a custome in generall that every Tenant in his Mannor that marrieth his Daughter to any man without the licence of the Lord shall pay a fine and have paid a fine to the Lord for the time being this prescription is void for none in such case ought to pay fines but Villains vide ibidem plura So if the Lord of a Mannor do prescribe that for the time being he hath used to distraine Cattell were upon the demeans of his Mannor for Damage-feasant and the distresse to retain till fine were to him for damages at his will this prescription is void for it is a Maxime in Law Aliquis non potest esse judex in propria causa no man can be a Judge in his own case ibidem 141. a. And therefore a Fine levied before the Bayliffs of Salop was reversed because one of the Bayliffs was a party to the fine because he cannot be a Judge and a party coke ibidem So a custome that the Lord shall take for Heriot the beast of a stranger levant and couchant upon the
sub eo ipse sub nullo nisi tantum sub Deo Bract. l. 1. c. 8. The King is the Vicar and Minister of God upon earth every one is under him and he under none but onely under God and therefore the Lands which are in the Kings possession are free from tenure for a tenant is he which holdeth of some superior Lord by some service so as the King cannot be a tenant because he hath no superior but God for as Coke l. 8 f. 118. It would be against common right and reason that the King should hold of any or doe service to any of his Subjects and therefore all Lands holden of him mediately or immediately Co. com f. 1. and for which reason Cowell thought it not so proper in the Kings case to say that he is seised in dominico suo ut de feodo as if feodum in our Law was taken as it is in the fendall Law onely for the Lands held in Services whereas feodum as Bracton Britton Fleta and Littleton tels us idem est quod haereditas Davis case of Tenures f. 30. Neither can the King be a Joynt-tenant with any though it be of land or other things that he had in his body naturall for none can be equall with him And therefore if two purchase lands to them and their heirs and one be made King they are no more Joynt-tenants but Tenants in Common 3 Eliz 339. Nay Acts of Parliament do not bind him unless they concern the Common-wealth or he be specially named 4. E. 4 21. 1 Eliz. 223. And no man can declare against the King but he must sue by way of Petition Ployd f. 241. b. 18 Eliz 498. He hath the property of all Goods that are nullius in bonis and shall have all Tythes out of Forrests and places out of any Parish for rex est persona mixta cum sacerdote In a Writ of Error upon false Judgment given for the King no Scire facias shall go forth ad audiendum errores for the King is alwaies in Court and that is the cause that the form of Entry is in all Suits for the King in the name of his Attorney generall F.N.B. 21. b. Rex semper praesumitur attendere ardua negotia regni pro publico bono omnium Coke l. 5. f. 56. a. It is alwaies presumed that the King doth attend the weighty and hard things of the Kingdome for the publick good of all And therefore have the Grants of the King a more beneficiall interpretation then the Grants of the Subject that may attend their private Affaires which are alwaies taken more strongly against them As if the King do grant lands to I.S. and his Heirs and in truth I. S. is the Kings Villain that shall not enfranchise the Villain by Implication The same Law is of an Alien born 17. E. 3. 39. The Advowson of Pravondry holden of the King was aliened to an Abbot and his Successors and that the Successors shall hold the Provandry to their own use The King shall seise the Advowson for Alienation in Mortmain and destroy the Appropriation for he shall not be ousted of his right of Advowson by Implication So 2 R. 2. 4. If two be indebted to the King and the King release to one it shall not discharge the other for no prejudice shall accrue to the King by construction or implication upon his Grant more then he truly intended by it ibidem So if a release be made by him of all demands the right of Inheritance shall not be released 6 H. 7. 15. If the King granteth lands in fee upon condition that they do not alien it is good but in all these cases it is otherwise in the case of a common person And in many cases the King who claimeth by a Subject shall be in a better case in respect of the Prerogative incident to his Royall person then the Subject himself by whom he claimeth As if the King have a Rent-seck by Attainder of Treason or by Grant he shall distrain for it not onely in the land charged but also in all his other lands and yet the Subject by whom he claimeth shall not distrain If a Subject have Recognizance or an Obligation and after is outlawed or attainted the King shall seise all the land of the Conusor or Obligor where he himself can have but the Moyety the King shall take advantage of a Condition broken without demand whereas a common person who claimeth under the King cannot re-enter for non payment of Rent without demand made And if the King purchaseth a Lordship of which land is holden by posteriority the King shall have the priority vide ibidem plura in Knights case Davis f. 45. If a common person grant rent or any other thing which lieth in grant onely without limitation of any estate by the delivery of the deed only a Frank-tenement shall passe 17 E. 3. 43. a. If the King grant rent or land without the limitation of any estate the Grant is meerly void for the incertainty 7 Ass pl. 1. and the Grantee shall not be Tenant at Will as it is ruled in the case of Alton Wood. Ployd f. 243. The Grant of the King is taken more strongly against a stranger and more favourable to the King although the thing granted come to the King by purchase or descent Whereas it is otherwise of a common person As a grant of a Mannor by the King the Advowson shall not passe without speciall words So the King may grant a thing in action which another cannot So if the part of an entire thing commeth to the King the Common Law hath given him all As if an Obligation be made to two and one is outlawed the King shall have all the duty So he shall have an entire Horse or Oxe which one who is outlawed holdeth in Common ibidem So Coke l. 9. f. 129. b. Quando jus domini regis subditi in simul concurrunt jus regis preferri debet when the right of the King and the Subject concur and meet together the right of the King ought to be preferred as in Dame Hales case Baron and Feme Joynt tenants of a term for years the Baron is felo de se the Baron shall forfeit all Ployd Com. 262. vide ibidem plura in Quicks case The King may mend his Declaration that term that it is put in p. 13 E. 48. So the King may wave his Demurrer and traverse the plea of another M. 28 H. 6. f. 2. So if the King grant lands in fee with Warranty against all the Patentee shall not have value in recovery without express words to have value So the King may make a Lease to a stranger this reservation is good and the stranger shall distrain for it or have an action of debt after the Lease determined M. 35. H. 6. f. 36. Ployd f. 243. a. So for arrearages of Rent-charge granted to the King he may distrain in all other
in Auditor Carles case offices committed to many are more safely discharged And therefore by the Statute of 32. H. 8. it is provided that there shall be two persons named to the Kings highnesse which shall be called the Auditors of the Lands of his graces Wards and the King cannot constitute one onely for the subject by the Act hath an interest in it and more safely are the businesses dispatched which are committed to many and therefore though the words of the grant be conjuctim divisim alterius eorum diutius viventi yet are they not materiall for if an office be granted to two pro termino vitarum suarum without more by the death of one of them the grant shall be void for being an office of trust there shall be no Survivor And in this case no Survivor shall be because the Act saith there shall be two persons and though the King may constitute one at one time and another at another time yet he that is first chosen shal have no judicial voice until the other is constituted and to this purpose there may be a Survivor of one of the persons to whom another shall be added Plus vident oculi quam oculus nemo potest supplere vicem duarum personarum Coke l. 4. f. 46. a. Two eyes see more then one and no person can supply the place of two and f. 118. a. As if a baron be made Knight of the Garter or Warden of the Cinque Ports hee shall have but three Chaplaines in all notwithstanding the Statute of 21. H. 8. for though he hath diverse dignities yet is he the same person to whom the attendance is to be made for it is a difficult matter for one man to supply the place of two and though it be a ground quando duo jura in una persona conveniunt aequum est ac in diversis when two rights concur meet together it is all one as if it were in several yet this Act was allwayes construed strictly against non-residencies and pluralities as a thing very prejudiciall to the service of God and instruction of the people and therefore if a Bishop be translated to an Arch Bishopwrick or a Baron be created an Earle and now hath both those dignities yet by this act he shall have but so many Chaplaines as an Arch-Bishop or an Earle may have for the reason abovesaid Ibi. Minister legis non tenetur in executione officij sui sugere aut recedere Coke l. 9. f. 68. a. in Makalies case An Officer or Minister of Justice is not bound in the execution of his office to flye or to goe back and therefore an Officer and Minister of the Law in the execution of his office if there be any resistance and assault is not bound to flye to the wall c. as other Subjects are for the life of the Law is more favored then the life of man and the execution of the Processe of Law and the offices of the conservators of the peace are the soul and life of the Law and the meanes by which Iustice is administred and the peace of the Realme guarded Officia judicialia non concedantur ante quam vacant Coke l. 11. f. 4. in Auditor Curles case judiciall offices ought not to be granted before they are void and therefore was it resolved in that case that the grant made by the King to John Churchill and John Tooke in reversion after the death of T. and C. was void partly because it was a judicial office for these Auditors are one of the Iudges of the Court and as none can give any judgement of things which happen in future so none can be a Iudge in future and great inconvenience would thereupon ensue for he who at the time of the grant of the reversion may be able and sufficient to supply the place of judicature and administer Iustice to the Subjects of the King before the office fall may become unable and insufficient to performe it and it was resolved that neither the office of master of the Wards nor of the Survivor nor of the Attorney of the same Court may be granted in reversion because they are judiall offices But ministeriall and secular offices may be granted in fee in tail for life or at will as the offices of the Constable of England Marshall Vis-count or the Warden of the Fleete and the reason is because those temporall officers have their offices in their naturall capacity and the King in policy may suppresse and revive those offices pro loco tempore and by consequence may limit temporall estates in them Davis f. 45. b. So the office of keeping of our Lady of Lincolne was entailed and a Formedon brought upon that guift of the Office by the Issue in taile 18 E. 3. 27. The Office of one of the Chamberlains of the Exchequer was entailed 1 H. 7. 8. The Office of a Fostership was entailed 4 H. 7. 10. 9. Coke comm f. 20. a. vide ibidem plura Aliquis non debet esse judex in propria causa immo iniquum est aliquem suae rei esse judicem Coke l. 8. f. 118. a. No man ought to be Judge in his own case yea it is a partiall and unequall thing that any one should be a Judge in his own matter In Dr. Borhams case in which case one of the reasons there alledged was that the censors had not power to commit Dr. Bonham because they could not be Judges Ministers and Parties Judges to give sentence Ministers to make summons and Parties to have the Moyety of the forfeiture for no man can be a Judge in his own case one cannot be a Judge and an Attorney 3 E. 6. f. 65. Dyer If any act of Parliament give to any one power to hold or have Cognizance of all manner of pleas before him arising within his Mannor of D. yet he cannot hold plea to which he himself is a party for it is unequall for any one to be a judge in his own matter vide ibidem plura Yet in some cases one shall be his own Judge Pay-master and Carver As if the Lessor covenant to repair the house if he do not and the Lessee do it he may pay himself out of the rent 12 H. 8. 1. Guardians of a Church at their own costs repaire the Church and for amends detain ten load of stones of the Parishioners for which the Successors Guardians bring an action of account and adjudged that they may lawfully detain them 37 Eliz. Metholl and Winge So Taylors and Hostlers may detain the Robe or Horse c. untill reasonable satisfaction is given If one to whom the Testator is indebted will not receive Goods in recompence then it is lawfull for the Executor to pay him with his own money and retain so much Goods of the Testator for it may be there is a penalty which will be forfeited before that he can sell the Goods of the Testator Dyer f. 2. pl.
their Predecessors but excuse themselves and answer for their proper fact and demeanor for it is a common erudition that the Defendant in his answer and bar ought either to traverse or confess and avoid the Plaintiff vide ibidem plura Yet in Treasons and Felonies one shall be punished for anothers offence and by our Law and not without good reason the Sons of them which are disloyall Subjects and Traytors to their Prince are barred from the Inheritance of their Ancestors that their Fathers infamy may alwaies accompany them and that their life should be a punishment to them and their Fathers fault a continuall corasive and that is done because their Fathers Ulcers are feared in them and that being bred and brought up of naughty Parents they will be prone to do the like and this penalty is used in the nature of a medicine that by suffering shame he may be deterred from crime and therefore as Coke com 5. f. 391. l. by his attainder of Treason or Felony is the blood so stained and corrupted that his Children cannot be Heires to him nor to any other Ancestor And therefore where the Tenant is outlawed of Felony it is in the Lords election to have a Writ of Escheat supposing that his Tenant was outlawed of Felony or that he died without Heir for by the attainder the blood is corrupted 48 E. 3. 2. But it seemeth by Nichols case that the party attainted ought to be dead before the land can escheat for according to Dyer and Brian in the Kings case after the attainder and till Office be found the Fee-simple shall in facto be in the person of the attainted so long as he shall live for as he hath a capacity to take lands of a new purchase so he hath power to hold his ancient possessions and he shall be Tenant to a Praecipe and if he died before Office found and the land be held of the King the land shall go to the King in nature of a common Escheat Ployd 477. Nichols case but in case of Treason the King shall be presently after the attainder in actual possession without Office found by the Statute of 33 H. 8. c. 20. If the Father purchaseth land and his eldest Son is attainted of Felony and dieth the next in degree of descent and worthiness of blood unto the Son attainted shall not have the land but it shall escheat to the immediate Lord of whom the land is held for the blood is corrupted otherwise it had been if he had died in the life of the Father having no Issue Dyer 48. An account is brought against two the one entreth into an account and it is sound against him it shall bind both 44 E. 3. 18. One is imprisoned in the Marshalsey and a stranger breaketh the Prison and the prisoner escapeth the Marshall shall be charged for the whole debt If I have a way over the lands of twenty men and one of them stoppeth the way in his land I shall have an action against all those over whose lands the way was 33 H. 6. 26. by profit A rate is put upon a Town for the fees of a Knight of the Parliament The Beasts of him hath paid his part are taken for the residue he shall not have a Replevin but the beasts shall be sold to pay his duty 11 H. 4. 2. In quo quis delinquit in eo de jure est puniendus Co. com f. 233. b. In what one offendeth in the same by right he is to be punished As if any Keeper kill any Deer without warrant or fell or cut any Trees or under-woods and committeth them to his own use it is a forfeiture of his Office for the destruction of the Deer is by a mean the destruction of the Venison And so it is if he pull down the Lodge or any house within the Park for putting of Hay into for feeding of the Deer or such like it is a forfeiture and the reason why the Office shall in such and the like case be forfeited because in what one offendeth in that he shall be punished Dispensatio mali prohibeti est de jure Domino regi concessa propter impossibilitatem providendi de omnibus particularibus dispensatio est mali prohibiti provida relaxatio utilitate seu necessitate pensata Coke l. 11. 88. a. The dispensation of a prohibited evill is by right granted or allowed to the King because of an impossibility for providing for all particular things and a dispensation is a provident relaxation of an evill prohibited recompensed with profit and utility As where an Act of Parliament which generally prohibiteth a thing upon penalty which is popular or where it is onely given to the Queen may be inconvenient to divers particular persons in respect of the person place or time c. therfore in such causes the Law hath given power to the Queen to dispense with particular persons But when the wisdome of Parliament hath made an Act to restrain pro bono publico the Importation of any forrein Manufactures to the intent that the Subjects may apply themselves to the making of the said Manufactures c. and by it maintain themselves and families Now for private gaine to grant the importation of them to one or divers against the said Act is a Monopoly and against the Common Law and against the end and scope of the Act it self vide ibidem plura in the case of Monopolies Coke l. 5. f. 28. Cawdrys case By the Ecclesiasticall Lawes of this Realm a Priest cannot have two Benefices nor a Bastard be a Priest but the King by his Ecclesiasticall power and jurisdiction may dispense with both these because they are mala prohibita and not mala in se The King by a clause of non obstante may dispense with the Statute-law and that if the Statute saith that dispensation shall be meerly void 2 H. 7. Grants 73. Finch f. 82. Coke comm f. 120. a. A party or Minister disabled by reason of any corrupt Contract c. by the Act of 13 Eliz. which is an absolute and direct Law cannot be dispensed withall by any Grant c. with a non obstante as it may be when any thing is prohibited sub modoâ— as upon a penalty given to the King Coke l. 4. f. 35. b. in Bozums case when the King by the common Law cannot in any manner make a grant there a non obstante of the common Law will not make the grant good against the reason of the common Law as if the King granteth a protection in an assize or Quod impedit with a non obstante of any Law to the contrary that grant is void for by the common Law a protection doth not lye in any of these cases 39. H. 39. But when the King may lawfully make a grant but the common Law requireth that he may be so instructed that he be not deceived there a non obstante may supply it as when the King
Law Wafrages and protection to the passing Merchants of the Sea was one of the principall causes of the payments of those duties Davis ibidem f. 12. And Dyer f. 43. Putteth a difference between a custome and a subsidy and saith that the custome for Merchandizes to be transported out of the Realme is an inheritance of the King and by the common Law and not given by any Statute and that appeareth by the Statute of 14. E. 3. which was the first Statute which maketh mention of any custome and that Statute doth not give or limit any Custome to the King but abridgeth and abateth the custome which was paid for Wool or Leather but a subsidy saith he is a Tax assessed by Parliament and granted to the King by the Commoners during the life of every King only which is made cleer by the case reported by Dyer 1 Mar. f. 92. where King Edward the sixth had granted a Licence to a Merchant stranger to transport all Merchandizes paying pro custumis subsidiis tot tantas denariorum summas quot quantas any english Merchant and Denizen should pay and no more And it was resolved by all the Judges after the death of Edward the sixth the grant was good for the Customes but void tor the Subsidies because the King had an Inheritance in the Custome as a Prorogative annexed to the Crown but in the Subsidies he had an estate only for life by act of Parliament But there is a third kind of duty payable for Merchandizes which are called Imposts or Impositions and these were sometimes rated and assessed by Parliament and then were they of the nature of Subsidies and sometimes were imposed by the Prerogative Royall to support the necessary charges of the Crown and then as the ancient Senator of Rome said Nihil magis justum est quam quod necessarium est There is nothing more just then that which is necessary Davis f. 12. vide ibidem plura The Impost upon Wines was first assessed by Parliament and limited to be paid for certain years which being expired is now continued by Parliament ibidem Opoâ—tet patrem familias vendacem esses non emacem Cato major Davis f. 10. The Master and Father of a Family ought to be a buyer and not a seller By the Grecians Kings were called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Pastors of the people and Emperors by the Romans Patres Patriae Fathers of their Country for their vigilant and Paternal care they were to take for the preservation and provision for the people for he is the publique Pater familias and is to bend his thoughts to the utility and commodity of the publique and as he is reputed a provident Father of a Family who hath more commodites to sell then occasions to buy so ought he to be a seller rather then a buyer and to provide that more native commodities be exported for sale and the less forrein Merchandizes imported to the buyer And therefore the little custome of forrein Commodties was then accepted of the King when but a little quantity of such forrein Wares were imported into England For in the time of Edward the first and after that in the times of Edward the third the native Commodities of England exported were of greater quantity and value by two parts of three at the least then the forrein Merchandizes imported by which King Edward the third raised so great a revenue out of the Native Commodities of his Dominions that it was noted for good Husbandry in that King for a Father of a Family ought rather to be a buyer then a seller but now it is altogether contrary for at this time the Out-gate is lesser then the In-gate and the forrein Commodities imported are of greater quantity and value by two parts then our native Commodities exported which is a great shame to our Nation to be so enamoured with Mercery and Grocery Wares imported by strangers and to expend upon those more then the value of all the Staple Commodities of our Country which will be in the end the decay and ruine of the Common-weale Davis ibid. Thesaurus regis est pacis vinculum bellorum nervi Coke l. 3. f. 12. b. The treasure of the King is the bond of peace and the sinewes of war And therefore the Common Law preferreth and advanceth the right of the King insomuch as Sir Henry Finch observeth you shall find it to be Law almost in every case of the King that is not Law in case of the Subjects and that with an intention to inhaunce the Kings Treasure and to replenish his Coffers whereby he may in time of peace advance the glory and honour of the Nation and in time of War be enabled to protect the Common-wealth against forrein incursions and invasions for the Kings Treasure is the bond of peace and sinewes of war And therefore in the case of the King which is not so in the case of a common person the body the lands and the goods of the Accomptant or Debtor of the King at the Common Law were liable to the execution of the King Dyer 234. before the Statute of 33 H. 8. c. 38. Coke ibidem and upon the same reason is this principall grounded Quando jus domini regis Subditi in simul concurrunt jus regis preferri debet Coke l. 9. 3. 129. b. when the right of the King and the Subject concur together the right of the King ought to be preferred As in Dame Hales case Ployd 262. Baron and Feme were Joynt-tenants of a term for years the Baron is selo de se he shall forfeit all and yet till the Office it surviveth but after the Office it hath relation before or at the least at the time of the death vide ibidem plura in Quicks case So Ploâ—d f. 263. b. If a Feme take husband and hath Issue and the land descend to the Feme and the Baron enter so that he is intituled to be Tenant by the Curtesie and then the Feme is found an Ideot and her Estate in the land is also found the King shall have the land and if the Feme dye the Baron shall never have the land by Curtesie for by the first possession of the Feme the Baron was entituled to be Tenant by Curtesie and when the Office is found the Title of the King shall have relation also to the first possession and so both the Titles commence at the same time but the King shall have the preheminence and because the Title of the King is in this case to the Frank-tenement of the land in that that he shall have the custody of it during the life of the Feme it shall utterly take away the Title of the Baron which before the Office found was vested in the Baron and therefore after the death of the Feme he shall not be Tenant by courtesie but the Issue shall have the lands out of the hands of the King if it be not
holden of the King and if it be the King shall have it for the Wardship of him during the nonage and upon the same reason was this principall also founded Thesaurus competit domino regi non domino libertatis nisi sit per verba specialia Fitz. Coro 281. 436. It is a firm conclusion in the Common Law that Treasure belongeth to the Lord the King and not to the Lord of the Liberty unlesse it be by speciall words Adrianus Caesar made a Law that if any man found treasure in his own ground himselfe should have it if in another mans ground he shall give the half to the owner of the Soil if in a publick place he shall devide it equally with the Treasury but now and long time ago the Civill Law hath transferred it to the Prince which is thus defined by Justinian Vetus depositio pecuniae vel alterius metalli cujus non extat modo memoria ut dominum non habeat An ancient deposition or hiding of money or some other metall of which for the present no memory is extant that it may have a Lord or owner Wherein the Common Law of this Realm accordeth with the Civill Law which holdeth that Treasure hid in the earth not upon the earth nor in the Sea and Coyne though not hidden being found is the Kings which we call Treasure trove Stanf. f. 10. 27 Ass pl. 19. 10. Eliz. Ployd 322. And Mr. Stanfords reason why such Treasure should belong to the King is un-answerable and it is this Quia dominus rei non apparet ideo cujus sit incertum est because the Lord and Owner of the thing doth not appear therfore whose it is it is uncertain 22 Ass pl. 19. And it is a currant rule in all Nations In ambiguis casibus semper praesumitur pro rege and in doubtfull cases it is alwaies presumed and taken for the King Many other benefits and prerogatives there be which the Common Law of England giveth to the King in regard of the exceeding charge and cost he is at in the defending and governing the Common-wealth of which I may plainly say as Cicero said of the Romans That all the Revenue and Treasure is scarce able to Lips de Mag. Rom. l. 1. c. 4 5. maintain the Army both by Sea and Land and therefore hath need of many Prerogatives and benefits It were tedious to touch them all and will onely name some which I deem pertinent to the precedent principle As the Mines of Gold and Silver which by the Law of Nations as well as the Common Law belong to the King and Prince for to whom should Gold and Silver appertain but to him that hath authority to coyne it as his own according to the answer of our Saviour Matth. 22. v. 20. Date quod est Caesaris Caesari and therefore moneta dicitur a monendo quia impressione nos monit cujus est Moneta Davis f. 19. And therefore the Judgment given in the case between the Queens Majesty and the Earle of Northumberland seemeth to be sound and grounded upon invincible reason although the Grant was Omnium singularum Minerarum of all and singular Mines for the diversity is there well taken by Wray that there be two sorts of Mines Mines royall and base Mines and Mines royall may be sub-divided into two other kinds those which contain in them Silver or Gold entirely or which have Brass or Copper in them and have some veines of Gold intermixt both these belong to the Prince for the Gold as the more worthy draweth to its self the less worthy But such as have in them meerly Brass Copper or Lead may belong unto a Subject by a special Title And that in such case the Proprietor of the land and Soil shall have the Ore and Mine and not the King by his Prerogative which was the opinion of all the Judges and they all also agreed that a Mine royall be it of base Mettal or pure Gold or Silver may by grant of the King be severed from the Crown and granted to any other for it is not an incident inseparable to the Crown but the King may sever it by apt and precise words but not by the words of all and singular Mines Ployd f. 333. 335. vide ibidem plura in the case of Mines There is another speciall Prerogative which the King hath in the Sea for the Sea is not onely under the Dominion of the King as it is said 6 R. 2. Fitz. protection 46. The Sea is of the legiance of the King as of the Crown of England but is also his proper Inheritance and therefore the King shall have the land gained out of the Sea Dyer 226. Also the King shall have the great possessions of the Sea as Whales Sturgeons c. which are royall Fishes and no Subject can have them without special grant of the King Prerog regis c. 10. Stanf. 37 38. And the King shall have wild Swans as volatilia regalia upon thâ— Sea and the Braches of the Sea Coke l. 7. f. 17. in the case of Swans So the wreck of the Sea is a perquisit royall Coke l. 5. 107. Sir Henâ—y Constables case And upon this reason before the Statute of 18 E. 3. no Subject might pass beyond the Seas without speciall licence of the King but there it is enacted that the Sea shall be open to all Merchants And all Havens and Ports quae sunt ostia Janua regni appertaine to the King because he is custos totius regni F.N.B. 113. a. And the King ought by right to save and defend his Subjects against the Seas as against his Enemy And therfore the Commission of Sewers was awarded by the King by vertue of his Prerogative royall before any Statute made in such case extendeth not only to the walls and banks of the Sea but also to all navigable Rivers and Fresh-waters F. N. B. 113. a. And in the Statute of 25 H. 8. c. 10 The King by reason of his Prerogative royall ought to pâ—ovide that navigable streams be made passable And the City of London by the Charter of the King have the River of Thames granted to them and purchased another Charter by which the King granted to them solum fundum of the said River by force of which Grant the City receiveth the rents of them which fix posts or make Wharfs or other Edifices upon the Soil of the said River so as the King hath the same Prerogative in the Braches of the Seas and navigable Rivers and fresh-waters so high as the Sea floweth and refloweth in them as he hath in Alto mari And though the Civillians say that Flumina portas publica sunt ideoque jus piscandi omnibus commune est in portu fluminibusque that Rivers and Havens are publick things and therefore the right of fishing is common to all in Rivers and Havens which rule is found in Bracton l 2. c. 12. Yet by the
when we apprehend the reason of the Law that is when we bring the reason of the Law to our own reason that we may perfectly understand in as our own ibidem and therefore we use to say in argument that reason will that such a thing be done or that reason will not that such a thing be done Noy max. f. 1. for as Ployd f 34. our Law hath reasonable constructions in all things As if I be bound to perform the Covenants in such an Indenture it shall be intended all the Covenants or that my Feoffees shall make an Estate it shall be intended all my Feoffees Lex est summa ratio Coke com 97. b. the Law is the chiefest reason that is an artificiall and legall reason warranted by authority in Law ibid. 62. a. and therefore Littleton saith Semper quaere de dubiis quia per rationes pervenitur ad legitimam rationem Alwaies enquire of doubts for by reason you shall come to a lawfull reason for reason is radius divini luminis and by the reasoning and debating of grave learned men the darkness of ignorance is expelled and by the light of legall reason the right is discerned and thereupon judgment given according to Law which is the perfection of reason Coke com f. 232. b. Nay the Common Law it self is nothing but reason which is to be understood of an artificiall perfection of reason gotten by long study observation and experience and not of every mans naturall reasons for Nemo nascitur artifex No man is born an Artist This legall reason is summa ratio And therefore if all the reason that is dispersed into so many severall heads were united into one yet could he not make such a Law as the Law of England is because by many successions of ages it hath been fined and refined by an infinite number of grave and learned men and by long experince grown to such a perfection as the old rule may be verified Neminen oportet esse sapientiorem legibus No man ought out of his own private person to be wiser then the Law which is the perfection of reason Co. com f. 97. b. And though the Jurisdiction of the Court of Parliament is so transcendent that it maketh enlargeth diminisheth repealeth and reviveth Lawes Statutes Acts and Ordinances concerning matters Ecclesiasticall Capitall Criminall Common Civill Martiall Maritine and the rest Coke comm f. 110. a. yet cannot a Parliament confirm any thing which is against Law and reason And therefore if a Town hath customes which are against Law and reason and their customes be confirmed by Parliament Danby chief Justice in such case saith M 5. E. 4. f. 40. 41. That such confirmation shall not extend to such customes For a thing used meerly against Law and reason is not custome notwithstanding the usage as the Law saith and therefore the Act of Parliament which confirmeth their customes is referred to that which is not for they are not customs and therefore shall be void Ployd f. 399. b. vide ibidem plura Quod est contra rationem est illicium Coke com f. 97. b. what is contrary to reason is unlawfull And therefore Tenant in Franck-marriage shall do fealty to the Lord before the 4th degree passed for it should be inconvenient and against reason that a man shall be Tenant of an an Estate of an Inheritance to another and yet the Lord shall receive no manner of service of him and therefore he shall do fealty for all service ibid. And all positive Lawes which are contrary to the Lawes of nature and the Law of reason lose their force and are no Lawes at all Such was that of the Aegyptians to turn weomen to Merchandizes and Common-wealth affaires and to keep men within doors And such was the Law of the Thracians who accounted stealing very commendable and idleness an honest thing Finch Nom. l. 75. Quod est inconveniens contra rationem non est permissum in lege Whatsoever is convenient and contrary to reason is not permitted in the Law Coke com 178. a. If a man be seised of lands in Fee-simple and hath issue two daughters and the eldest is married and the Father giveth parcell of the lands to the Baron with his Daughter in Franck-marriage and dieth seised of the remnant which are of the greater value by the year then those lands given in Frank-marriage In this case the Baron and the Feme shall have nothing for their pur-party of the said remnant unless they will put their lands given in Frank-marriage in hotch pot with their remnant of the land with the Sister And if they will not do so then the younger may hold and occupy the same remainder and take to her the profits only for if the other partner should have nothing of it is given in Frank marriage of this a thing would ensue an inconvenience and a thing against reason which the Law will not suffer and therefore if the Baron and Feme will not put their lands in Frank-marriage in hotch pot they shall have nothing of the remnant because it shall be intended by the Law that she is sufficiently advanced to which advancement she agreeth holdeth her self content Littleton ibidem Mutata legis ratione mutatar lex Coke l. 7. f. 7. The reason of the Law being changed the Law it self is changed As though by the Common Law a man cannot distrain for rent or service in the night 12 E. 3.17.11 H. 7.5 accord yet for damage-feasant a man may distrain in the night for the necessity of the case for otherwise peradventure he shall not distrain at all for before the day they may be taken or strayed out of the ground 10 E. 3. f 37. In the Statute of Winchester it is provided that in Cities or great Villages which are inclosed the gates ought to be shut from the setting of the Sun to the Sun rising and since that Statute if in such Village or City inclosed any murther or manslaughter be done in the day or in the night and the Offender escape such City or Village shall be amerced which Act changed the reason of the Law for at the common Law if a man was slain in the night and the Offender escape there it was not any default in the City and Village but now if they do not guard their Gates strongly according to the Statute by which the Offendor escapeth then it is a default and negligence in them 3 E. 3. tit Coronae 290. So if divers commit a robbery by the Statute of 13 E. 3. those of the hundred ought to apprehend all the Felons and though they apprehend any of them that is not sufficient to excuse them for the words of the Act are that they shall answer for the bodies of the Offenders but now by the Statute of 27 Eliz. c. 13. it is provided that none shall have an action upon the said statute if not that the party robbed so soon as he can
words in a condition shal be taken out of their proper sense ut res magis valeat quam pereat Coke com 213. a. If one giveth Lands to two and the heires of their two bodies ingendred the Donees have joynt estates for life and severall inheritances for if one of the Donees hath issue and dyeth the other shall have all by survivor during his life but if the Survivor hath issue and dyeth then the issue of the one shall have the one moiety and the issue of the other the other moiety of the Land and shall hold the Land together in common and the cause why they shall have severall inheritances is for that they cannot by any possibility have an heire between them engendred and when the grant is impossible to take effect by the letter there the Law shall-make such constâ—uction as the guift by possibility may take effect Co. 83. b. If Lessor of an house for twenty yeares maketh a Lease for two yeares rendring rent and after granteth all his terme and interest to another if the Lessee atturne the Reversion shall passe and if no Atturnement be had yet the ieterest in the Reversion shall passe so as the Grantee shall have the Land after the two yeares determined for the grant of one shall not be adjudged void if to any intent it may take effect Coke l. 4. f. 53. b. If a Termor grant his Terme Habendum immediate post mortem suam the Grantee shall have it presently ut res magis valeat quam periat Noy Max. f. 16. So if a man make a Lease for ten yeares and after for twenty yeares the latter shall be a good Lease for ten yeares after the first is expired Ibidem A release of all Actions against a Prior and Covent shall be construed all Actions against the Prior for an Action cannot be brought against the Covent Coke l. 1. f. 76. Gardiner and Bredons case Tenant for life of Land the Remainder in taile Tenant for life and he in the first Remainder in taile joyne in a fine sur conusans de droite come ceo c. to another in fee who granted a Rent charge of forty pounds to tenant for life it was agreed by all the Justices that the fine levied by tenant for life him in the first Remainder was no discontinuance of the first Remainder in taile nor of the second because every of them did only give that they may lawfully give and no forfeiture in the case be cause the law which abhorreth all wrong shal conster it first to be the grant of him in the Remainder in taile and then the grant of Tenant for life ut res magis valeat quam pereat but if a Feoffment had been made by word then it is the surrender of Tenant for life and the Feoffment of him in the Remainder Ibidem Coke l. 1. f. 45 a. In 2. R. 3. 4. it is holden by Starky and others that if the Patent of the King may be taken to two intents good then it shall be taken more beneficially for the King but if it may be taken to one intent good and to another intent void then it shall be taken to that intent to make the grant good and not to that intent to make it void ut res magis valeat c. vide ibidem plura in Alton Woods case Coke l. 5. f. 8. a. In Cessavit where the Tenure is alledged by Homage Fealty and Rent and the Demandant counteth that in doing the said services he did cease it shall be taken by construction to such services onely of which a man may cease 6. H. 7. 7. as of Rent and not of Homage and Fealty and the reason of this is ne res destruatur least the thing should perish vide ibidem plura Ployd f. 197. b. Anthony Browne Justice said that it is an office of a Judge to expound the thing ut res magis valeat quam pereat and to make all parts of the Deed and intention of the parties also to agree together Coke l. 4. f. 4. If I grant to you that you and your heires shall distraine for a rent of forty shillings to wit within my Mannor of S. that by construction of Law shall amount to a grant of a Rent out of my Mannor of S. for if it shall not amount to a grant of a rent the grant would be of little force or effect if the Grantee shall not have but a nude distresse and no rent in him for then he shall never have an Assize of it and for that reason it hath been often times ruled that it shall amount to the grant of a Rent by construction of Law ut res magis valeat 3. E. 3. 12. c. Benedicta est expositio quando res redimitur a destructione Coke l. 4. f. 25. b. Blessed is the exposition when the thing is redeemed from destruction every Mannor which consisteth of Frank-tenements and Copy-holders hath two severall Courts the Court of Frank-tenements wherein the Suitors are Judges and is called the Court Baron and the Court of Copy-holders wherein the Lord or Steward of the Mannor are Judges and if all the Tenements escheate or the Lord release the tenure and service of his Frank-tenements yet the Lord may hold his Court of Copy-holds and make admittance and grant of them ne res destruatur it is a ground in Law verba debent intelligi ut aliquid operetur Coke l. 8. f. 24 words must so be understood that they must worke some thing and not be idle and frivolous in Edward Foxes case wherein it was resolved that a demise and grant upon consideration of fifty pound for ninty nine yeares amounted to a bargaine and sale for the said yeares for when a Frank tenement or tenement passeth by Deed indented and inrolled it is not necessary to have those precise words of bargaine and sale but words which amount to so much are sufficient as if a man covenant in consideration of mony to stand seised to the use of his Son in fee if the Deed be enrolled it is a good bargaine and sale and yet there are no words of a bargaine and sale but amount to as much Coke l. 7. f. 40. So if a man for mony alien and grant Land to one and his heires or in tail or for life by Deed indented and enrolled it shall amount to a bargaine and sale and the Land shall passe without any livery and seisin It is a ground in Law verba sunt accipienda cum effectu Coke l. 4. f. 51. a. b. Words are to be taken with effect as if a man hath in the right of his wife any estate in Fee-simple Fee-taile or for terme of life c. the Baron shall have all the arrerages as well before marriage as after the death of his wife by the Statute of 10. H. 6. 11. for though by the Common Law the Executors c. of the wife might have an Action
of debt for the arreaâ—ages before the coverture yet when as the Statute giveth to the Baron an Action of debt for the arrearages the words shall be taken with effect and shall be construed for the arreages due before It is a rule in the Law that verba restringuntur ad habilitatem personae vel ad aptitudinem rei Bac. Max. f. 14. Generall words are to be restrained to the condition of the person or fitnesse of the thing as if a man grant to another common inter metas bundas villa de Dale and part of the vill is his severall and part of his wast common the Grantee shall not have common in the severall yet this is the strongest exposition against the Grantor so by all the precedent rules and grounds it appeareth that the rule that words shall be taken more strongly against the Grantor doth yeild to them as the more worthy and equitable vide ibidem plura where this rule with its differences and exceptions is amply and accurately discussed The grant of a common person shall be taken more strong against him but the grant of the King shall be taken more strong against a stranger and more favorable for him Ployd f. 243. a. As a Mannor granted by the King the advowson shall not passe without speciall words 2. H. 7. 8. So the King may grant a thing in action Ibidem And if the King grant a Mannor or Land without limitation of any estate the grant is void for the incetrainty and the Grantee shal not be tenant at the will of the Lord Davis Rep f 45. vide ibidem plura This rule hath no place in Acts of Parliament Verdicts Judgements or Devise Bacon f. Max. 21. Expressio eorum qâ—ae tacite insunt nihil operatur Coke l. 4. f. 73. b. The expression of those things which are covertly implyed worketh nothing for the expression of a clause which the Law implyeth operateth nothing as in 30. Ass Pl. 8. A Lease is made to two for terme of their lives diutius eorum viventi and after they made partition and the one dyeth and he in reversion entereth and his entry adjudged lawfull notwithstanding the said words diutius eorum viventi for without those so much was covertly implyed by the Law 17 E. 3. 7. Hulls case whereupon Coke giveth this observation that in case of lease for life it is more beneficiall for the Lessor to have the joynture severed then to have it continue but otherwise it is in a Lease for yeares for if a man makes a Lease for yeares to two with a proviso that if the Lessees dye within the terme that the terme shall cease the Lessees make partition or one alieneth his part and dyeth the Lessee shall not enter into his part that is dead but the Grantee or the Executors of the Lessee shall 〈…〉 So if the King maketh a Lease for yeares rendring rent without limiting of any place or to whose hands it shall be paid the Lessor may by the Law pay it either to the receipt of the Exchequer of the King or to the hands of the Bailiffs or receivors of the King whom the King hath authorized to such purpose and therefore the usuall and speciall limitation of the payment of rent at the receipt of the Exchequer c. doth import no more then the Law will imply and therefore nihil operatur Ibidem Coke l. 8. f. 26. b. If the King reciting that another holdeth the Mannor of D. for life granteth the said Mannor to B. for his life in this case the Law implyeth that the second grant shall begin and take effect after the determination of the first grant and therefore there is no incertainty in the grant though it be not expressed so for the expression of a clause which the Law implyeth operateth nothing ibidem in the Earle of Rutlands case Coke l. 10. f. 39. a. By the Statute of 32. H 8. Tenant in taile may make a Lease for three lives or ten yeares and by the Statute of 4. H. 2. c. 24. he may levy a fine and by the Statute of 32. H. 8. c. 36. by it bar the issues and therefore if a man make a guift in tail and further grant that he may lease for life or for yeares or levy a fine with proclamations to bar the Issues nihil operatur for when one maketh a tacit guift in taile he giveth those incidents to it Ibidem And therefore are such conditions and expressions called by Sir Francis Bacon clausula vel dipositio inutilis an unprofitable clause and disposition and to no use because the act or the words do express no more then the Law by intendment would have supplyed and that therefore the doubling and iterating of that and no more then which the conceite of the Law doth in a sort prevent and preoccupate is reputed nugation And thâ—refore if a man devise Land at this day to that they must worke some thing and not be idle and frivolous in Edward Foxes case wherein it was his Son and heire it is void because the disposition of the Law did cast the same upon the heir by descent 32. H. 8. Gourd 39. Ber. And yet if it be by Knights service Land and the heire within age if he take by the devise he shall have two parts of the profits to his own use and the guardian shall have the benefit but of the third Brooke devise 41. But if a man devise Lands to his two Daughters havnig no Sons then the devise is good because he doth alter the disposition of the Law for by the Law they shall take in coparcenary but by the devise they all take joyntly Dyer 12. Bacon f. 74.75 vide ibidem plura Yet Littleton saith it is well done to put in such clauses to declare and expresse to the lay people which are not learned in the Law what the Law is in such cases Co. lib. 4. f. 73. b. Expresum facit cessare tacitum Coke com f. 183. b. A matter or thing expressed causeth that to cease or to be of no effect which by intendement of Law was implyed and not expressed As if one grant Lands to two without expressing what estate they shall have they have a joynt estate for terme of their lives but if a Lease be made to two Habendum to the one for life the remainder to the other for life this doth alter the generall intendement of the promises so if a Lease be made to two Habendum the one moiety to one and the other moiety to the other the Habendum doth make them tenants in common for that which is expressed doth make that which is secretly intended to cease Ibidem for as he in another case saith if the generall words should stand without any qualification then the speciall words should be altogether vaine Coke l. 8. f. 154. in Edward Althans case quod vide Coke Com. f. 210. a. b. If the Feoffee in mortgage before
at Westminster to the Church of S. Peter at Rome within three hours that then the Obligation shall be void the Condition is void impossible and the obligation standeth good And so it is of a Feoffment upon condition that the Feoffee shall go as is aforesaid the Feoffment is absolute and the Condition void because it is a Condition subsequent for there is a precedent Condition and a subsequent Condition If a Condition subsequent to a Feoffment in fee be impossible the state of the Feoffee is absolute but if the Condition precedent be impossible no state or interest groweth thereupon As if a man make a Lease for life upon Condition that if the Lessee go to Rome as aforesaid that then he shall have fee the Condition precedent is and therefore no Fee-simple followeth Coke ibid. The statute appointeth that in re-disseisin the Sheriff shall go to the place and there shall take the Inquest If then the re-disseisin is of severall lands in divers Counties so as he cannot be at all at once it is sufficient to take the Inquest at one of them because of the impossibility 40 Ass 23. If a man be bound by recognizance or Bond with Condition that he shall appear the next term in such a Court and before the day the Conuzee or the Conuzor dieth the Obligation is saved And in all cases where a condition of a Bond or Recognizance c. is possible at the time of making of the Condition and before the same can be performed the Condition becometh impossible by the act of God or of the Law or of the Obligee there the Obligation is saved But otherwise in case of a Feoffment as if a man maketh a Feoffment on condition that if the Feoffor shall appear in such a Court the next term that then it may be lawfull for the Feoffor to re-enter and presently after the Feoffor dieth the estate of the Feoffee is become absolute And the reason of this diversity is because the estate of the land is executed and setled in the Feoffees and cannot be returned back but by matter subsequent viz. The performance of the Condition But a Bond or Recognizance is a thing in action and executory and whereof no advantage can be taken untill there is a default in the Obligor Coke com f. 260. a. vide ibid. plura Vltima prioribus derogant Reg. I. C. Leges posteriores priores contrarias abrogant Coke l. 11 f. 62. 63. The last Laws derogate and abrogate the first which are contrary Though the wisdome of the Judges and sages of the Law have all wages suppressed subtle and new inventions in derogation of the Common Law and will not change the Law that hath been used 38 E. 3. 1 so as if it be not altered by Parliament it remaineth still yet as Cato said Vix ulla lex fieri potest que omnibus commoda sit And as Sir Edward Coke rerum progressui ostendunt multa quae initio praecaveri provideri non possint It is impossible for any Law to be which may be commodious to all and the progress and proceeding of things shew and present many things which at the first could neither be presaged nor prevented From whence it proceedeth that no Law can be so absolute but that may in some particulars prove defective and amendable and yet as Ployd f. 369. that Law is reasonable which provideth for the multitude though some especiall persons lose by it which hath been the occasionall cause of the alteration of the Common Law in many points Yet the Common Law hath no controller but the high Court of Parliament and the wisdome and custome of this State hath alwaies had such regard and respect to the Common law that they would by no meanes change it but by the great Councell of Parliament wherein all things are transacted not onely by the prudency of the Prince but by the cheifest and sagest Senators of the whole Nation and that not upon the consultation and declaration of one or two hundred but as Fortescue by more and three hundred elect men by which number the Senate of Rome was ruled who alwaies have been cautious and vigilant not to introduce any forrein Law as Sir John Davis in his Preface observeth That in the Parliament of Merton when motion was made by the Clergy that Children borne before marriage might be adjudged legitimate The great and wise men of England made answer with one voice Nolumus leges Angliae mutari And again in 11 R. 2. when a new course of proceeding in criminall Causes according to the form of the Civill Law was propounded in that unruly Parliament Answer was made by all the States That the Realm of England had not been in former times nor hereafter should be ruled by the Civill Law And therefore for the most part Magna Charta which is the foundation of other Acts of Parliament and other ancient Statutes are but the affirmations and declarations of the Common Law And that whereas the words of the Statute are generall the construction thereof shall be according to the reason of the Common Law Coke com 81 b. 282. b. So cautious have our grave and prudent Senators been not to subject the common-law to any mutations unless for necessary and impulsive causes reasonably arising from the publick mischeifs and inconveniencies which happen in the Common-weal through the injurious abuses of the ancient and former Lawes upon which grounds other Lawes were constituted for the remedy of such mischeifs and inconveniencies which did abrogate the former from whence grew this ground Leges postertores priores abrogant To illustrate this by examples It is regularly true that Statutes in the affirmative shall not take away precedent acts affirmative unless it be in speciall cases As the Statute of Wills 32. 34 H. 8. doth not take away a custome to devise lands as often hath been adjudged So it is enacted that the King shall have Wreckum Maris per totum regnum yet this shall not take the wreck from one who hath wreck by prescription unless the prescription had been per totam Angliam Coke l 5. in Sir Henry Constables case So the Statute of 21 H. 8. c. 13. enacteth that if one â—ath a Benefice of the value of eight pounds and taketh another and is inducted the first is void doth not take away the Law which was before that if one who had a Benefice with cure did accept another the first is void only that in that case no lapse shall incur without notice Coke l. 4. in Hollands case and in this point is the Statute nothing else but a confirmation and affirmance of the Law before ibid. So the Statute of 23 Eliz. that inflicteth the penalty of twenty pounds by the moneth hath not taken away the Statute of 1 Eliz. which hath given the forfeiture of twelve pence for every Sunday and Holy-day but both shall be paid the twelve pence onely to
seised by word assigned Dower to the Feme which she accepteth yet was it adjudged that that refusall of the estate of inheritance and acceptance of her Dower in pais shall not devest the Frank-tenement out of her So 13 Ric. 2. Joynt-tenancy a Charter of Feoffment was made to foure and seisin delivered to three in the name of all and after the Seisin delivered the fourth commeth and vieweth the Deed and saith by word that he will have nothing in the Land and it was adjudged that that agreement by word in pais shall not devest the Frank-tenement out of him and Thorp 35 Ed. 3. Disclaimor said that in such a case the Tenement remained in all untill a disagreement in Court of Record So if there be Lord and Tenant by Deed enfeoffeth the Lord and a stranger and maketh Livery to the stranger in the name of both if the Lord by word disagreeth to the estate it is nothing worth but if he enter into the Land generally and take the profits that amounteth to an agreement to the Feoffment but if he enter into the Land and distrain for his Seignory that act amounteth to a disagreement of the Feoffment and shall devest the Frank tenement out of him 10 E. 4. 12. by all the Justices But if Lands be given to Baron and Feme and after by the Statute of 32 H 8. the Baron alieneth the Land to the use of him and his heires and after deviseth it to his wife for life the wife enters claiming by word the estate for life this is a good agreement to the estate for life and a good disagreement to the estate of inheritance Dyer 351. b. And if A. maketh an Obligation to B. and deliver it to C. to the use of B. this is presently the Deed of A. But if he offereth it to B and he refuseth it in pais by it the Obligation shall lose his force Dyer 167. The same Law is of the gift of goods and chattels and if the goods be delivered to the use of the Donee the goods were in him presently but he may refuse them in pais and by it the property shall be determined ibidem SECT III INclusio unius est exclusio alterius Coke l. 11. f. 50. a. b The inclusion of one thing is the exclusion of another As when an act of Parliament giveth a power and interest to one certain person by that expresse designation of one all others are excluded although such a statute be in the affirmative As where the statute of 31 E. 3. c. 12. it was provided that error in the Exchequer shall be corrected and amended before the Chancellor and Treasurer and therefore it could not be corrected before any other and the generall Rule is put that when any thing is to be done before any person certain by any statute it cannot be done before any other and yet the statute of 31 E. 3. is in the affirmative Ployd 106. b. in Stradlings case So whereas by the statute of 8 H. 6. c. 9. forcible Entry is designed to the Justice of Peace to make restitution by it others be excluded though the statute be in the affirmative and therefore neither Justices of Oyer or Terminor or of Goal-delivery c. shall do it Dallisan 3 Eliz vide ibid. plura And this is true in all acts which are the introduction of a novel Law as the above said acts are but where acts of Parliaments are no introductions of a new Law it is otherwise So the act of 35 Eliz. doth not exclude those to whom the Forfeitures are limited by the act of 23 Eliz because by it they are not given to a new person but to the same person to wit the Queen and is but an act of addition to give more speedy remedy As the statute of W. 2. c. 9. in a VVrit of Mesne giveth more speedy proces and in the end fore-judger whereas the proces at the Common Law was but Distresse infinite yet the Plaintiff may take which proces he will either at the Common Law or upon the statute because they are both in the affirmative Coke l. 11. f. 64. a. And also in many cases the designation of a novell person in a latter act of Parliament shall not exclude another person that was authorized to do the same thing by an act precedent As by the statute of 8 H. 6. c. 16. after Office found he who found himself grieved might within a moneth after traverse take the Tenements to farm that then the Chancellor Treasurer or other Officer shall demise to him to farm untill c. 13 E. 4. f. 8. and yet by the statute of 1 H. 8. c. 16. he hath liberty by the space of three monthes and after by the statute of 32 H. 8. c. 40. the Master of the Court of Wards by advice of own of his Councell is authorized to make a Lease of Land in VVard or an Ideot And though the latter act design another person yet it is not the first altogether taken away for before any Lease made by the Master of the VVards the Chancellor and Treasurer may do it and so e contrario as Stanf. holdeth Prerog f. 69. a. b. VVhere he maketh mention of this Rule â—eges posteriores priores contrarias abrogant vide ibidem plura Coke com f. 210. a. If the Condition upon a Mortgage be to pay to the Mortgagee or his heires the money and before the day of payment the Mortgagee dyeth the Lessor is not to pay the money to the Executors but to the Heire for in this case designatio unius personae est exclusio alterius Consensus tolliâ— errorem Coke com f. 37. a. Consent taketh away error As Dowment ad ostium Eclesiae ex assensu patris seem to be good albeit the wife be within the age of nine years But without question for the same reason a Joynture made to her under or above the age of nine years is good ibidem Coke com f. 125. b. a. If a Venire facias be awarded to the Coroners where it ought to be to the Sheriff or the Visne cometh out of the wrong place yet by assent of the parties and so entred of Record it shall stand for all consent taketh away error ibidem Coke l. 5. f. 36. b. Dyer 367. in Bainhams case Coke l. 5. f. 40. a. b. in Dormers case A common Recovery is not to be resembled to a judgement or proceeding at the common Law for by usage and custome it is become a common assurance and conveyance of Lands and because it is done by mutuall consent errors are not to be allowed for consensus tollit errorem If the Demandant and Tenant consent that two of the foure in a Writ of Right shall be Esquires where by the Law they ought to be Knights and well because by consent Tryall of Villenage was altered from the naturall tryall by consent Pleader of a Feoffment upon condition without deed and
first because he requested it which implyeth an assent secondly because he accepted it which also implyeth an assent for it mattereth nor whether one giveth his assent by words or by things themselves and deeds vide ibidem in Lampeis case As if the Baron accept the Grant of a reversion that amounteth to an Attornement 44. E. 3. Fines 37. Littleton so 37. H. 6. 17. he which hath interesse termini to wit a future interest cannot by expresse words surrender it but the acceptance of a new Lease shall drowne it and in 7. E. 3. 50. The Lord demanded an heriot and the heire delivereth a Beast in which himselfe hath property in his own right to the Lord that amounteth to a guift Ibidem N.S. seised of Mannors for the preferment of Winifâ—id his wife and Anne his Daughter covenanteth to stand seised to the use of himselfe c. for life the remainder in taile to A. his Daughter with a proviso that if he shall be disposed to determine c. the said uses it shall be lawfull for him so to doe by writing indented under his hand and seale subscribed by three witnesses and to limit the said uses to any other and N. S. after by indenture subscribed by three witnesses in consideration of a joynture to his second wife covenanted to stand seised to the use of himself his second wife and it was resolved though there was no expresse signification of his purpose to determine c. the former uses yet his last Indenture to stand seised to himself and his second wife should enure to the determination of the former uses c. and that by it ipso facto the former uses did cease and also inure to the raising of other uses c. quia non refert an quis intentionem suam declaret verbis an rebus ipsis vel factis because it is no matterwhether one declareth his intention in words or in the things themselves or deeds for by the limiting of other uses he did declare his intention and purpose to determine and alter the uses before Coke l. 10. f. 144. a Scroops case Conditio beneficialis quae statum construit benigne secundum verborum intentionem est interpretanda odiosa tamen quae statum destruit stricte secundum verborum proprietatem est accipienda Coke l. 8. f. 90. b. Provisoes and conditions which goe in destruction and defeasances of estates are odious in Law and are to be taken strictly and shall not be construed to make void any other use or state which is not within the words of the proviso but beneficiall conditions which make an estate are favorably to be taken according to the intention of the words As if a Feoffment be made upon such condition that the Feoffee shall give the Land to the Feoffor and the wife of the Feoffor and to the heires of their two bodies engendred the Remainder to the right heires of the Feoffor if the Baron dye living the Feme the Feoffee by the Law must make the estate to the Feme so neer the condition that he can make it as Littleton saith to wit to lease it to the Feme for terme of her life without impeachment of wast and after her decease to the right heirs of the Baron and of her ingendred the remainder to to the right heirs of the Baron and so if the Baron Feme dye before the deed made And with it accordeth the 2. H. 4. 5. But when conditions enure to the destruction of estates then they shal be taken strictly as if a man make a Feoffment in fee of certaine Lands upon condition that the Feoffee shall not give the Land to Baron and Feme and to the heires of their bodies engendred if the Baron dyeth without issue and the Feoffee maketh a lease for the life of the Feme without impeachment of waste that is no breach of the condition for it is taken strictly because it runneth to the destruction of the Feoffment vide ibidem plura in Frances case A lease made to one upon condition that the Lessee shall not alien to A. B. and he alieneth to R. B. and it seemed that the Condition was not broken for every Condition must be taken strictly for if a man maketh a Feoffment on condition that he shall not enfeoff I. S. and dieth and his Heire enfeoffeth I. S. that is no breach of the Condition Dyer f. 45. Pl. 1. A man is bound to another in an hundred pounds that he shall discharge the Obligee and â—ave him harmlesse of all Suits and Incumbrances against I.S. and after the said I. S. sued the Obligee and proceeded unto Judgment and the Defendant pleaded non damnificatus and Beaumon Serjeant sayd That in the eye of the Law untill his Goods or Lands were actually charged he was not damnified But Walmesley Justice held that there were two sorts of damages executory and executed executory which a man may in future time sustain executed as if the Land or the person should be in present execution As if the Disseisee maketh a release to the Disseisor and a stranger cancelleth the the Deed of the Release the Disseisor may have an action of trespasse against him and yet the Disseisor doth continue in possession and is not actually damnified And the Justices said the Land in some sort was actually charged for who would buy the Land of the party but only under value because of the Judgment executory 33 Eliz. Ridgleys case If a man be bound to make a sufficient estate in Land to one according to the advice of I. S. if he make an estate according to his advice whether it be sufficient or no he is excused 7 E. 4.13 A TABLE of the grounds and RULES contained in this Treatise A. ABundans cautela non nocet An abundance of circumspection doth not hurt fol. 323 Actus Dei nemini facit injuriam The act of God doth injury to no man 6 Actio personalis moritur cum persona A personall action dieth with the person 48 Actori incumbit onus probandi stabilitur praesumptio donec probetur in contrarium The burthen of proving lyeth on the Plaintiff and the presumption is confirmed untill it be proved to the contrary 46 Accessorium sequitur suum principale An accessory followeth the principall 56 Accusare nemo se debet nisi coram Deo No man ought to accuse himself unlesse it be before God 222 Actus non facit reum nisi mens fit rea The act maketh not a man guilty unlesse the mind is guilty 231 Actus repugnans non potest in esse produci A repugnant act cannot be brought into being 124 Actus me invito factus non est meus actus An act done against my will is not my act 434 Actus legis nemini facit injuriam The act of Law doth no man injury 463. 317 Ad libitum Regis sonuit sententia legis The sentence of the Law soundeth according to the Kings
part which agreeth not with the whole Ployd f. 161. a. And therefore every part of a deed ought to be conferred with the other and one entire sense thereupon to be made as if I release all actions and stay there all actions are gone but if I say further which I have as Executor to I. S. there the generality is restrained So 17. E. 4. f. 22. The King granteth to Garter King of Heralds ten pounds for the terme of his life if he had stayed there he had had it absolutely for terme of his life but where he faith further by reason of his Office by it hee hath restrained the generality vide ibidem plura in Throgmortons case so as if he be removed from his Office he shall lose his annuity Parte quacumque sublata integrante sive necessaria tollitur totum the substantiall or necessary part of any thing being taken away the whole is destroyed Coke l. 3. f 41. in Ratcliffs case As none can be procreated but of the father and the mother and ought to have in him their two bloods which bloods commixed in him by lawfull marriage constitutes and makes him heire so none can be heire to any unlesse he hath in him both the bloods to whom he shall be made heire and therefore the heire of the halfe blood shall not inherit because hee wanteth one of the bloods which make him inheritable for the blood of the father and mother are but one blood inheritable and both are necessary to the procreation of an heire and therefore if there be Baron and Feme Donees in speciall taile and the Baron is attainted of treason and executed having issue and the Feme die the issue shall not have the Land because the father is attainted for he ought in his lineall conveyance to make himselfe heire as well of the part of his father as of the part of his mother Dier f. 332. b. And that bar and forfeiture is made by the Statute of 26. H. 8. c. 13. which provideth that every offender convict of high treason shal forfeit to the King c. All his Lands c. saving to every person all his right title interest c. so as the issues in taile are barred by that statute because the heire is disabled and cannot make himselfe heire in his lineall convâ—yance as well to the father as mother Coke l. 9 f. 140. a. upon which reason Britton saith that if one be attainted of felony by judgement the heires engendred after the attainder shall bee excluded of all manner of succession of inheritance as well of the part of the father as of the part of the mother because at the time of the generation of him the fathers blood was corrupted et ex leproso parente leprosus generatur filius Coke l. 3. f. 41. vide plura From the circumstances of time and place MOmentum instans est unum indivisibile in tempore quod non est tempus neque pars temporis ad quod tamen partes temporis copulantur Ployd 110. b. The distinction of a moment cannot be discerned or observed in the actions of men who cannot doe any thing without the space of time yet as Ployd f. 258. b. in Madam Hales case in things of instant there is a priority of time in the consideration of the Law as in a felon of himselfe the forfeiture shall have no relation but to the time of his death and the death precedeth the forfeiture and notwithstanding the forfeiture commeth at the same instant when he dieth yet in consideration of Law one shall bee said to precede the other though both shall be said to come at an instant for every instant hath the end of one time and the commencement of another and so in the death of a Felon of himselfe the death and the forfeiture commeth together and at the same time and yet there is priority to wit the end of his life is the beginning of the forfeiture and yet the forfeiture is so neere the death that there is no meane time betweene them but are conjoyned for a moment or instant is one indivisible thing in time which is not time nor part of time to which notwithstanding the parts of time are conjoyned vide ibidem plura and in the case between Fulmasten and Steward fo 110. So Fulbeck in his Pandects L. 1. f. 9. b. The existence of a moment cannot possibly be discerned and therefore is not so much as the twinckling of an eye yet the Law doth operate without compass of time in an instant but man never for every act of man must have space longer or shorter but the nature of such instants as the law doth imagine is such and so suddaine that as the Civilians omnom respuunt moâ—am and the reason is because in the operation of the law that which is imagined to be done is dicto citius presently done and whereas the act of man is mixed with the act of Law though in regard of the same thing the act of Law is momentary yet the act of man must needs beare some delay as those things by the civill law which are taken from the enemies doe incontinently become his who doth seise and take them the law doth give them unto him presently yet there must be a time to take them that the Law may give them So if a Lease be made to A. for the life of B. and A. dyeth C. entreth into the Land and enjoyeth it as occupant the Law because it will not have the freehold in suspence doth imagine that it was presently and immediately in him after the death of A. and that he entred presently but if we respect the entry as the Act of man we must needs conceive that he had some time to enter into the Land and by his entry which is an act of motion to gaine the free hold ibidem Quae incontinenti fiunt in esse videntur Coke l. 8. f. 77. a. Those things which are done in an instant seeme to be in esse or in being in Staffords case as a particular estate and the increase of a particular estate ought to take effect by the same deed or grant or â—y two deeds delivery at the same time which is all one in effect for those things which are done in an instant and at the same time seeme to be in being And the particular estate and the increase of the estate upon it is but one grant to take effect out of the same root and though that it vesteth at severall times yet when it vesteth it hath the vigor and force of the same grant 27. H. 6. f. 7. So l. 2. f. 71. a. A condition cannot precede an estate but ought to be in the said conveyance or comprised in another deed delivered at one and the same time as the books are agreed in 17. Ass 2. and 34. Assise for the above said reason vide ibidem S. Cromwels case But Coke com f. 236. putteth
a difference between inheritances executed and inheritances executory as if Lands be executed by livery they cannot by Indenture of defeasance be defeated afterward or if the disseisee release to a disseisor it cannot be defeated by Indentute of defeasance afterwards but at the time of the release or feoffment the same may bee defeated by Indentures of defeasance for it is a Maxime in law quae inconunenti fiunt in esse videntur But Rents Annuities Conditions Warranties such like that be inheritances executory may be defeated by defeasances made either at that time or at any time after so is the law of statutes recognisances and obligations and other things executory ib. Agreeable to this rule is the reason of the case put by Bro. judgement 148. That if a Feme suffer a recovery of her joynture against the statute of 11 H. 7. without the assent of him in the reversion and after hee in the reversion releaseth to the recoveror by Fine that assent commeth too late and cannot make the recovery good was once void and for the same reason the consent of the major part of a Chapter must bee done at one time simul semel and not scatteringly or at severall daies vide Davis Rep. f. 48. b. So Pl. f. 135. a. b. A Lease by deed for 11. yeares and in security of the terme the Lessor made a Charter upon condition that if he was disturbed of his terme he should have fee and livery and seisin was made as well upon the one Charter as the other then the Lessee was disturbed and it was adjudged that he should have fee because the Charters were delivered at one and the same time T. 10. E. 3. f. 521. Tempus est mensura motus secundum prius posterius Aâ—ist 4. Phys Time is the measure of motion according to priority and posteriority for as the motion doth measure the place so doth time the motion as a days journey is measured of a day and an houres of an houre and because all contracts and matters of entercourse doe fall within the lists and precincts of time therefore the moments and measures of time should be publikely and familiarly knowne to popular conceits For tempus est mensura rerum time is the measure of all things and as Ployd f. 555. b. the diversity of estates proceeds from the diversity of time for the estate in Land is the time in Land for he that hath a fee-simple in Land hath time in the Land without fine or the Land for time without end so he that hath land in taile hath time in it or the land for time so long as hee hath issue of his body and he which hath an estate in Land for life hath time no longer then that he shall live and so for another mans life or yeares And as the time measureth things so doth the law measure time as by the true computation the lesser yeare consisteth of 865. daies and six houres whereby in every fourth yeare there is die excrescens which maketh that yeare to have 366. daies which is called the greater yeare yet by legall computation a quarter of a year containeth 91. daies half a year containeth 162. daies for the od houres in legal computation are rejected And in the statute de annob Sextil it is provided Quod computetur dies ille excrescens dies proxime praecedens pro uno die that the day excrescent and the day precedent shall be computed for one day so as in computation the day excrescent is not accounted so a month is regularly accounted in law for twenty eight daies and not according to the Solar month nor according to the Kalender unlesse it be for the account of the Lapse in a Quare impedit or the right of the Patron Coke com f. 135. b. And Kellaway 21. H. 7. f. 75. A feast in our law beginneth in the morning and endeth at the night and the naturall day beginneth ad ortum solis and endeth ad occasum solis and so is it taken and adjudged in our Law But the feast by the law of the Church beginneth at noone in the Vigil and lasteth untill the midnight of the next day and the night which maketh burglary beginneth ad occasum solis and lasteth untill the rising of the Sunne for where a man hath broken an house after the setting of the Sun it hath beene adjudged burglary for if the night should begin so soone as the day is ended and last untill the morning of the next day it would be too hard a thing to try c. ibidem In omnibus stipulationibus id tempus spectatur a quo contrabimus Reg. I.C. Paulus 62. ad edictum in all assumpsits and contracts that time is respected from which we contract as a man seised in fee maketh a lease for ten yeares and after selleth the land and taketh it back againe to him and his wife and then the husband and wife letteth it for twenty years reserving a rent the husband dieth the wife accepteth the rent for the first ten yeares by this the second lease is not affirmed for the acceptance of the rent before the lease beginneth and is not due is no acceptance 1. E. 6. 37. Coke l. 5. f. 1. a. b. in Claytons case From henceforth in a Lease shall be accounted from the delivery of the Indentures and not from the computation of the date for from henceforth is all one to say as from the making of the Lease Et traditio loqui facit chartam delivery maketh the deed to speake where a Lease is to begin from the making of a Lease there the day of the delivery shall be taken inclusive and the day it selfe is parcell of the demise but if it be made to begin from the day of the making or the day of the date then the day it selfe shall be taken exclusive and excluded And whereas the statute of 27. H. 8. Of enrolement saith That all such writings shall be enrolled within six monthes after the date of the same writings indented if the writings have date they shall bee accounted from the date but if the date be wanting the six months shall be accounted from the delivery vide ibidem plura In obligationibus in quibus dies non ponitur presenti die debetur Pomponius nulla temporis designatio praesens denotat Reg. I. C. And it is a ground in our Law that when a man 's bound in twenty pound to pay ten pound and no day of payment is limitted the lesser sum is due presently and ought presently to bee tendred 20. E. 4. 8. 21. E. 4. 8. In the case of the Mayor of Exeter by all the Serjeants and of some of the Justices yet by the opinion of Starky the discretion of the Justice shall limit a time having regard to the distance of the place and to the space of time wherein such a thing may be performed for the Obligor is not