LL. Canuti c. 13. 14. into his Place Which Power of deposing Earls and other Officers appears to have been vested in their Folkmotes by express Provision of divers Laws both of the Saxon and Danish Kings I confess in the Case of Earl Tosty Sax. Chr. p. 171. tis said That after the People had so elected Morker to be their Earl they certified their Election to the King and intreated his Assent thereto to which the King yielded and on the Vigils of Simon and Jude sent them a Confirmation or Renewal of the Laws of King Canute i. e. That for deposing Earls c. This shews That tho the King had the Power of confirming the Earl in his Office yet he could not of himself appoint any Earl over the People without their own free Election and Consent in a Folkmote or County Parliament Now Vide Edv. Cons 32. 35. as all Titles and Dignities in the Saxon Plan of Government had both Officium and Benesicium annex'd thereto so there were divers previous Qualifications necessary to enable the Persons to be elected to such Dignity or Office Thus in Order to be a greater Thanes-worthy Qualifications and Elections of Peers c. or worthy to be elected one of the greater Thanes i. e. Lord of a Hundred he was to have such an Estate and to be an Earl or Alderman's-worthy or worthy to be elected an Earl or Alderman of a County he was to have such an Estate with other Qualifications respecting each Office So that three Things at least ought to concur in constituting an Alderman or Earl of a County as also of a greater Thane or Lord of a Hundred both which with the Bishops then made up the Body of their ordinary Folkmotes and Witenagemotes viz. 1st He was to have an Estate in Lands with other Qualifications Secondly The Election and Consent of such Freemen over whom he was to preside And thirdly The Royal Assent or Confirmation usually in Parliament And further as all the Magnates Regni Who ordinarily were Representatives of the People That Bishops were elected by the People even after the Conquest See Sadlers Rigts of the Kingdom p. 1178. 133. 134. 140. c. and all other Officers and Magistrates whether Civil or Military and even Ecclesiastical as Bishops c. were in those Times elected to their respective Offices by the Persons over whom they were to preside so they were liable for Misbehaviour in their Offices not only to a Deprivation but also to be otherwise censured and punished in their Folkmotes and other Conventions and consequently were under the strictest Guard to keep to their Duty and perform their Trust both in their Folkmotes or County Parliaments as also in the Grand Witenagemote or Supream Parliament And tho such Officer presided in the former as their Prince or King yet in the latter he was but their Representative And thus the Magnates Regni Nota. or Lords of Parliament were originally and ordinarily no other than the Representatives of the Commons or Freemen Tis true in extraordinary Cases Spel. Glos verbo Subsidium as in Granting of New Ayds or Taxes as Danegelt c. the Commons likewise attended in Parliament either in Person or by their Deputies specially authorized but such Ayds and Taxes were then very rare See Mr. Madox's Hist Exchequer c. 7. 8 9 c. the Crown in those Times being abundantly supply'd in ordinary Cases by its Rents and Revenues both certain and casual as Fines Forfeitures Escheats the third Part of the Profits of all Leets Hundreds Counties and other Courts Ayds to make the King's eldest Son a Knight Vide Paulus Manut. De Legihus Romanis to marry his eldest Daughter c. all which I take to be of a British or Roman Original Besides which if we consider the vast Profits and Revenues then arising from the antient Demesne and other Crown Lands we may easily Grant That the King had rarely any Occasion for extraordinary Ayds For the Tenants of those Lands Spel. Glos verbo Villenagium holding the same in Villenage and they themselves being esteemed as the Villani Regis the King could not only Tax 'em at his Pleasure but also appoint 'em what Officers and Magistrates and even out 'em of their Possessions as he pleased and therefore Tenants in antient Demesne while they continued such 〈◊〉 were never esteemed Freemen they never served on Juries never voted for Members of Parliament nor ever contributed to their Expences In short They were thought to be so far under the Power and Influence of the Crown as not to be in any wise entrusted with the Peoples Liberties Sir H. Spelman in his Glossary In verbo Subsidium p. 527. says thus I find not that the antient Saxon Kings had any Subsidies c. But they had many Customs whereby they levyed Money of the People or Personal Services towards building repairing of Cities Castles Bridges Military Expeditions c. call'd Burgbote Bridgebote Herefare Heregeld c. But when the Danes oppress'd the Land King Egelrede or Ethelred Anno 1007 yielded in a Parliament to pay them 10000 l. which was afterwards encreased to 36000 l. then to 113000 l. and lastly Note this Assessment was doubtless with Consent of the Commons Q. If Church-men were not Procuratores aut Participes Danici Subsidii to a yearly Tax or Tribute of 48000 l. This was called Danegeld and for raising it every Hyde or Plough of Land was cessed at 12 d. yearly the Church-Lands excepted which therefore was called Hydage and Carvage which Name afterwards remained upon all Subsidies and Taxes imposed upon Lands for sometimes it was imposed upon Cattle and then twas called Horngled But tho' the Saxon Witenagemotes were so ordinarily held per Regem cum Magnatibus Regni Yet it is very Evident that when any matters were to be there Transacted which in general concerned the Body of the Freemen of the Kingdom in such cases the Rule was Quod tangit omnes tractetur ab omnibus and nothing could be determined in their Parliaments relating to Peace or War new Ayds Taxes or other publick charges on the People without their Common Assent either in Person or by special Representatives Tis true See Madox ut ante the Saxon Kings had very rarely any such Ayds Taxes or Subsidies as are granted to our Kings at this Day The vast Profits arising to the Crown in those Days consisted in the Rents and Produce of their antient Demeasn Lands the third Part of the Profits of all the County and other Courts in the Kingdom besides the many other Incomes on Fines Forfeitures and other Penalties and other Revenues certain and casual made it seldom necessary to Tax the People by a Parliament They had also says Spelman many Customs In verbo Subsidium whereby they levied Money of the People or exacted their Personal Services towards the Building and Repairing of Cities Castles and Bridges for Military Expeditions c. which they called Burg-bote
Barons only i. e. By Reason of the Temporal Baronies annexed to their Bishopricks and not as they are Spiritual Persons And they further urge in Confirmation of their Opinion 1. That no Bishop notwithstanding his Election Consecration Confirmation c. can be a Lord of or sit in Parliament till the King has granted to him the Temporalities of the Bishoprick 2. N. B. Tho this Stat. was repealed by Q. Mary yet that Repeal was repealed by Q. Elizabeth c. As the Parliamt at Bury 24 E. 1. 1 Eliz. all the Acts about Religion passed Dissentientibus Episcopis See Journal Dom. Procer 11 H. 7.27 Bro. Par. 107. Kelway 184. 3 The Commons See hereafter See Sadler's Rights p. 79. to 93. That by Virtue of the Stat. 1 E. 6. c. 2. still in Force The King may constitute Bishops by his Letters Patent only without any Election or Consecration and 3. That Parliaments have been and may be held Excluso Clero exclusive of the Bishops and Clergy and that some of our most beneficial Statutes have been enacted whereto the whole Body of the Clergy dissented all which they say prove the Bishops to be no essential Part or any of the three Estates of Parliament And in Trinity Term 7 H. 8. tis agreed by all the Judges of England That the King may well hold his Parliament by himself and his Lords Temporal and Commons without any Bishops or Spiritual Lords at all The third Estate of which we shall herein principally treat is on all Hands confess'd to consist of the Knights Citizens and Burgesses with the Barons of the Cinque-Ports all which being at this Day elected by the free Votes of the Freemen of Great Britain are properly esteem'd the Representative Body of the People and constitute that Part of the Parliament usually called the House of Commons N. B. The antient Modus Tenendi Parl. reckons up six Degrees or Orders of Parliament but that Division cannot be denominated six Estates The Numbers of the Commons Numb of Commons formerly See Mr. Willis's Preface to his 1 Vol. of Net Parl. Prynn of Parliamentary Writs I find to have been formerly variant according as the Sheriffs of Counties from what Motive is uncertain were pleased to direct their Precepts to the several Cities or Burros within their respective Counties or as the same Sheriffs made their Returns thereupon But indeed another Cause of this Variation was That it was usual for the Prince on his Accession to the Throne to grant Charters to antient Demesne Vills and other popular Towns thereby erecting 'em into free Burros and this consequently gave 'em a Right to be represented in Parliament And by this Artifice among others the Crown advanced its Interests in the House of Commons For it must be confess'd That by the antient Constitution there were no Representatives of the Commons as Commons in Parliament besides the Knights for the Shires the Barons for the Cinque Ports Crompt of Courts f. 2.3 c. Stat. 23. H. 6. c. 11. the Citizens for the Cities and the Burgesses for the ancient Burros only and that the Elections for all those were to be made by such Persons only as were possess'd of Lands or Tenements held by them as Freeholds or free Burgage Tenures which consequently excluded all Villeins and Copyholders Stat. 12. R. 2. c. 12. Crom. 2.3.4.5 Bro. Ant. Dem. 43â— as also Tenants in antient Demesne which were but the King's Villeins and the Tenants and Dependants of other Lords Parl. 96. Reg. 261. Nat. Bre. 14. from being either the Electors or elected of the House of Commons Indeed the Practice of increasing the Number of the Representatives of the Commons See Bohun's Col. per Tot. began very early viz. Temp. Johan if not before for I find it a Practice of that Prince to grant usually in Consideration of Money c. Charters to Antient demesne Towns as generally all Sea-Port Towns were thereby erecting 'em into free Burroughs The Representative of London and West p. 14. 10 p. 21. Spelm. in voce Major and hence it was as I conceive That Bridport Dorchester Harwich Helstone Kingston upon Hull and divers other antient demesne Towns came to be erected into free Burros which originally had no Right of being represented in Parliament But whatever Methods were then taken to encrease the Number of the House of Commons I find their Number to be much the same from the End of H. the 6th's Reign Fortescue p. 40. to the Beginning of that of H. the 8th viz. about 300. That H. 8. MS. Penes Authorem added to their Number 38. King Ed. 6. added to their Number 44. Queen Mary added to their Number 25. Queen Elizabeth added to their Number 62. King James the 1st added to their Number 27. And King Charles the 1st about 10. or 12. so that at the Time of the Restoration of King Charles 2. I find their Numbers to have been about 500. But the Commons about that Time restrained this mischievous Practice for the Future so that they declared the Elections made by Virtue of that Prince's Charters void and as Chester had been enabled to send two Members for the County and two for the City by Virtue of a Sta. 34.35 St. 34.35 H. 8. c. 13 St. 25. C. 2. c. 9. H. 8. so an Act past in the 25 Car. 2. enabling Durham to send four Members in like Manner and thus the Number of the House of Commons stood at 513 till the Union of the Kingdoms of England and Scotland when by Virtue of the Union Act St. 5. An. c. 8. forty-five Scottish Members were added which made the whole Number of that House to be 558 as it now stands Mr. Prynn and Others observe Denominations of Parliam Prynn's Rights of the Com. c. p. 99. 99. Spelm. Glossary in verb. Parlam Debata That our Ancestors had many Expressions and Phrases which signify'd a Parliamentary Assembly as Magnates Regni Omnes Regni Nobiles Proceres et Fideles Regni Universitas Regni Communitas Regni Discretio Totius Regni Generale Concilium Regni and many others varying the Stile in successive Ages till at length it came to be fix'd in the Word Parliament See divers Records and Precedents touching this Matter in the Appendix to Mr. Petyt's Miscellanea Parliamentaria Mr. Prynn also says Prynn's Truth triumphing over Falshood c. f. 69. Petyt's Antient Rights c. p. 68. That by many antient Precedents before the Conquest it is apparent that all our pristine Synods and Councils were nought else but Parliaments and that our Kings Nobles Senators Aldermen Wisemen Knights and Commons were usually present and voted in them as Members and Judges And Mr. Lambard Sir Robert Atkyns's Argument p. 18. see hereafter in his Archaeion maintains That Parliaments were used in the Saxon Times as in the Time of King Ina Ann. 712 and other Saxon Princes and that they then consisted of King Lords and Commons And that the
James the First the House being desirous to have a Bill forth with passed declared That the Royal Assent to one Bill or more did not dissolve the Session without some special Declaration of his Majesty's Pleasure to that Purpose 1 2 Phil. Mar. The King and Queen came of Purpose into the Parliament House Ibid. to give their Assent to Cardinal Pool's Bill and resolved upon the Question by the whole House That the Session was not thereby concluded but they might proceed in their Business notwithstanding the Royal Assent given But for more Security it is usual to insert a Proviso to that Purpose If there be divers Sessions in one Parliament Arc. Parl. 93. 〈◊〉 Jour 7.12 â—b and the King signs not a Bill till the last there all is but one and the same Day and all shall have relation to the first Day of the first Session Post 336. and the first Day and the last are but one Parliament and one and the same Day unless special Mention be made in the Act when it shall take its Force See Touching the Commencement Prorogation and Dissolution of several Parliaments from the Beginning of Edward III. to the End of Richard III. in Cotton's Records per Totum and from the Beginning of Edward VI. in Hale's Parliaments pag. 107 to 110. and pag. 142 143 c. Upon a Prorogation of the Parliament On a Prorogation Bills to continue in Statu quo Burnet 's Reformation Vol. I. pag. 276. Journal Dom. Com. 15 May 1540. 32 Hen. 8. to the 25th a Vote passed That their Bills should remain in the State they were in and upon their next Meeting they went on accordingly On the 18th of February 1666 the Parliament was prorogued till the 10th of October 1667. the King present Memorandum That his Majesty by Proclamation 1 Siderf 338. dated 26 June 1667. Ann. 19. of his Reign summon'd his Parliament to meet on the 25th of July following by Reason of the War against the Dutch then in Being On which Day they met and adjourned at his Majesty's Appointment to the 29th of the same Month on which Day a Peace being then concluded the Parliament was by his Majesty's Appointment prorogued to the 10th of October as aforesaid A Parliament may be summon'd by Proclamation to meet before the Day to which they are prorogued Anno Dom. 1628. Rush Vol. I. pag 537. 4 Car. 10 April Mr. Secretary Cook delivered this Message from the King That his Majesty desired this House not to make any Recess these Easter-Holidays that the World may take Notice how earnest his Majesty and we are for the publick Affairs of Christendom the which by such a Recess would receive Interruption But This Message for Non-recess was not well pleasing to the House Sir Robert Phillips first resented it Post 366. and too Notice that in 12 18 Jac. upon the like Intimation the House resolved it was in their Power to adjourn itself or sit Hereafter said he this may be put upon us by Princes of less Piety Let a Committee consider hereof and of our Right herein and make a Declaration And accordingly this Matter touching his Majesty's Pleasure about the Recess was referred to a Committee and to consider the Power of the House to adjourn itself to the End that it being now yeilded unto in Obedience to his Majesty it might not turn to Prejudice in Time to come Sir Edward Coke spoke to the same Purpose and said I am as tender of the Privileges of this House as of my Life They are the Heart-Strings of the Commonwealth The King makes a Prorogation but this House adjourns itself The Commission of Adjournment we never read but say this House adjourns itself If the King write to an Abbot for a Corody for a Valet if it be ex rogatu though the Abbot yeilds to it it binds not Therefore I desire that it be entered that this is done ex rogatu Regis Hereupon a Message was sent to the King That the House would give all Expedition to his Majesty's Service notwithstanding their Purpose of Recess To which Message his Majesty returned this Answer That the Motion proceeded from himself in regard of his Engagement in the Affairs of Christendom wished them all Alacrity in their Proceedings and that there be no Recess at all A Message from the King by the Speaker Ibid. pag. 608. same Year That his Majesty commands for the present they adjourn the House till To-morrow Morning and that all Committees cease in the mean Time And the House was accordingly adjourned On Wednesday February 25. the same Year both Houses by his Majesty's Command adjourned themselves until Monday Morning the 2d of March. Monday Ibid. pag. 660. and Appendix pag. 9. 2d of March the Commons meet and urged the Speaker to put the Question who said I have a Command from the King to adjourn till the 10th of March and put no Question endeavouring to go out of the Chair was notwithstanding held by some Members the House foreseeing a Dissolution till a Protestation was published in the House Hereupon the King sent for the Serjeant of the House but he was detained the Door being locked Then he sent the Gentleman-Usher of the Lords House with a Message and he was refused Admittance till the said Votes were read And then in much Confusion the House was adjourned till the 10th of March according as it was intimated from his Majesty In Mr. Mason of Lincoln's Inn his Argument for Sir John Elliot he said the second Charge in the Information against him was the Contempt to the Command of the King's Adjournment Jac. 18. It was questioned in Parliament whether the King can adjourn the Parliament although it be without doubt that the King can prorogue it And the Judges resolved That the King may adjourn the House by Commission and 27 Eliz. it was resolved accordingly But it is to be observed and wondered Rush Vol. I. in Appendix pag. 48. that none was then impeached for moving that Question And it is to be noted that they resolved that the Adjournment may be by Commission but did not resolve that it may be by a verbal Command signified by another and it derogates not from the King's Prerogative that he cannot so do no more than in the Case of 26 H. 8. c. 8. that he cannot grant one Acre of Land by Parol The King himself may adjourn the House in Person or under the Great Seal but not by verbal Message for none is bound to give Credit to such Message but when it is under the Great Seal it is Teste meipso And if there was no legal Command then there can be no Contempt in the Disobedience of that Command In this Case no Contempt appears by the Information for the Information is that the King had Power to adjourn Parliaments Then put the Case the Command be that they should adjourn themselves this is no Pursuance of the Power which he is supposed to have
cause why they sent Burgesses of Parliament and all the Proceedings thereupon are Coram non Judice illegal and void And the Right of sending Burgesses to the Parliament is questionable in Parliament only and the Occasioners Procurers Note and Judges in such Quo Warranto's and Proceedings are punishable as in Parliament shall be thought consonant to Law and Justice And note See Bohun's Inst Legalis 186.190 c. The Practice and Proceedings on Quo Warranto's Mandamus's and some other Prerogative Writs seem to have been an Invention of the Judges in order to draw the Rights and Privileges of Burroughs and Corporations as well as of the People under the Cognizance of B. R. c. Where the Articles against the Delinquents are ex Parte Domini Regis Selden 's Judicature 118. there the Commons cannot reply nor demand Judgment for the Suit is the King's and not theirs In Trewinnard's Case Id. 39. Dyer 60 61. The Priviledge of the Commons is termed the Priviledge of Parliament and the Judgment given in that Case by the House of Commons is there said to be The Judgment of the most High Court of Parliament Sir Robert Atkyn's Argument 35. which proves they are not without a Judicial Power The King cannot take notice of what is done in the Commons House Id. 53. or deliver'd to them but by the House itself and that is one of the Laws and Customs of Parliament In 31 Hen. 6. Id. 55. When the Commons requested the King and Lords to restore their Speaker to them c. The Judges being demanded of their Counsel therein See this Case reported at large in Bohun's Debates in Parliament p. 276. c. Ibid. after mature deliberation they answer'd It was not their part to judge of the Parliament which may judge of the Law The Reason to judge of the Law signifies that they the Parliament can judge whether a Law be good or not in order to approve it and to re-enact it or to repeal a Law c. In 1621. Ibid. The House of Commons made a Protestation against all Impeachments other than in their House for any thing there said or done It was said by Mr. Justice Crook Id. 58. Rush Col. Vol. 1. f. 663. That regularly a Parliament-Man cannot be compelled out of Parliament to answer Things done in Parliament in a Parliamentary Course See Sir R. Atkins's Argument per Totum If it be done in a Parliamentary Course what Occasion can there be to answer for it But who shall judge what is a Parliamentary Course but a Parliament Not Judges of the Common Law for the Parliamentary Course differs from the Rules of the Common Law 27 Eliz. 1584 ordered Sir Simon d'Ewes Jour 347 Col. 2. That the Serjeant of this House do forthwith go to the Common Pleas Bar and charge the Recorder then pleading there to make his present Repair unto this House for his Attendance See and Note the Case of Judge Thorp Cottons Rec. 74 and 316. who 25 E. 3. was condemn'd to Death and to forfeit all his Lands and Goods for Bribery i. e. receiving 20 l. from a Person who had a Cause depending before him Note in the Parliament 11 R. 2. commonly called The Wonder working Parliament all the Judges as they were sitting in Westminster-Hall were arrested c. by Order of Parliament And the like happen'd to several Judges in the Convention Parliament upon the Revolution but Quere if their Commitment was by the Lords and Commons or by the Commons only See also the Journal of the House of Commons Journal of the Commons An. 1680. Anno 1680 several Orders and Resolutions of the Commons against divers of the Judges and others for encouraging Addresses c. in Order to obstruct the Meeting and Sitting of that Parliament And see there December the 30th the following Resolutions of that House viz. 1. That the several Writings Papers and Proceedings relating to such Members of the late Long Parliament of Pensioners who receiv'd Allowances out of the Monies appointed for secret Services be produced to this House 2. Nem. Contr. That no Member of this House shall accept of any Office or Place of Profit from the Crown without the Leave of this House nor any Promise of any such Office or Place during his being or continuing a Member of this House 3. That all Offenders herein be expell'd this House See there also the Report and Censure of the the Proceedings of divers of the Judges of Westminster-Hall viz. Sir Francis North Sir W. Scroggs Justice Jones and Baron Weston whereupon the House came to the following Resolutions viz. 1. That the Discharge of the Grand Jury of the Hundred of Osulston in Com. Middx by the Court of B. R. in Trin. Term last before the last Day of the Term and before they had finished their Presentments was arbitrary and illegal destructive to publick Justice a manifest Violation of the Oaths of the Judges of that Court and a Means to subvert the fundamental Laws of the Kingdom and to introduce Popery 2. That the Rule made by the Court of B. R. in Trinity Term last against Printing of a Book called The Weekly Pacquet of Advice from Rome is illegal and arbitrary the Judges thereby usurping to themselves Legislative Power to the great Discouragement of the Protestants and countenancing of Popery 3. That the Court of King's Bench in the Imposition of Fines on Offenders have of late Years acted arbitrarily illegally and partially favouring Papists and Persons popishly affected and excessively oppressing his Majesty's Protestant Subjects 4. That the refusing sufficient Bail in those Cases wherein the Persons committed were Bailable by Law was illegal and a high Breach of the Liberties of the Subject 5. That the Expressions in the Charge given to the Grand Jury by Baron Weston were a Scandal to the Reformation and tending to raise discord between His Majesty and his Subjects and to the Subversion of the antient Constitution of Parliaments and of the Government of this Kingdom 6. That the Warrant mentioned in the Report i. e. for Harry Carrs Commitment c. was arbitrary and illegal And then follow the several Resolutions for Impeaching the Judges above-named See also Ibid. Jan. 3. and the Articles against Scroggs c. And Jan. 4. 1680 resolved Nem. Cont. That such Members of this House who in this Time of imminent Danger do absent themselves without Leave of the House are to be reputed Deserters of their Trust and Neglecters of that Duty they owe to this House and their Country 27 Eliz. 1584 John Bland a Currier for making dishonourable Reflections on the House of Commons brought to the Bar and pardoned upon his Submission paying twenty Shillings Fee to the Serjeant and taking the Oath of Supremacy Eodem An. Id. 368. Col. 1. A Warrant for a Writ of Priviledge awarded for setting at Liberty John Pepler Servant to Sir Philip Sidney a Member of this House now Prisoner for Debt in the Compter in