not because he had no recompence So in 17. E. 4.1 In Trespass for the taking of wheat the Defendant pleads That the Plaintiff sold it if he liked it upon view he should have it paying 40. d. and afterwards he saw it liked it and took it this is no good justification because he doth not alleadge payment so here So contracts conditional are good when they are performed but before performance they are onely communications Brook Recorder of London for the Defendant Where matters are to be tryed in the Civil Law there ought to be two witnesses here not necessary For where tryal is by twelve men because the Inquest may give a precise Verdict where there is no Testimony or Verdict or Evidence or Evidence be contrary to the Witnesses as in 14. H. 7.2 the Inquest acquit one indicted of murther he is arrained and acquit the Jury shall say who killed him although they have no witnesses and so witnesses are not necessary but where the matter is to be tryed by witnesses onely for if the witnesses were so necessary then it would ensue That the Jurors should not give their Verdict contrary to the witnesses where the Law is meerly contrary for when witnesses for tryal of the Fact joyn with the Jury if they cannot agree with the Jurors the Verdict of the 12. shall be taken and the witnesses rejected wherefore this point is clear enough And as to this which hath been said by Bradshaw That the deposition of Da. will make against us for that he saith That S. shewed to him that the entry was not made for more then 2000 Kintals Sir this saying is nothing to the purpose for if he cannot say something to prove the issue in which he cometh to depose then it is neither with us nor against us but it is of the same effect in Law as if he had said nothing or that he knew not of the matter and so this point is also clear enough And as to that which hath been moved also by Mr. Attorney That he ought to shew what rate in certain Sir this needs not here because it is expressed in the Statute 12. d. of every 20. s. and of general Statutes every one shall take notice And he argued and said That the agreement here shall be good and is within the intent of the Statute for in many Cases Gifts and Grants made will not be certain at the beginning and yet shall be good for that there is a mean to reduce them afterwards to certainty and yet the nature of Gifts and Grants is to be executed presently and every Gift is an agreement between the parties and so is every Grant and then if Gifts and Grants which are also agreements and the nature of which is to be executed properly at the time of the making of them it shall be good notwithstanding they are incertain at the beginning à fortiori Agreements Executory of things shall be good where they are incertain at the first and to prove that such Gifts and Grants shall be good notwithstanding their incertainty at the first there are many Cases and therefore if the King at this day grant over certain Lands which have come to his hands before and Grant over to the Grantee such Liberties Priviledges and Jurisdictions howbeit that the King knoweth not the certainty of the Liberties c. yet the Grant is good So in 9. H. 6.27 The King grants to the Dutches of York an Island with all Issues and Amerciaments c. there it is holden that the grant is good yet the King knew not what Issues or what Americiaments shall be afterwards forfeited but for that that when they shall be forfeit they will be certainly known and so hath a means to know the certainty of them this is the cause that the Grant shall be good And so in 5. E. 4. the King Granted to one called Garter the Office of the King of Heralds cum seodis prosicuis ah antiquo c. There this Grant purports a certainty of the Fees and Profits belonging to it and therefore good And so in 30. H. 6. The King Grants all such Lands as came to him by Attainder c. it is good although it comprehends no certainty And so if the King will pardon all Riots Pardon is good howbeit it comprehends no certainty 21. H. 6.43 A Parson grants to me his Tythe-wooll the next year or perquisites of his Court the Grants are good So Perkins 17. Feoffment of two Acres to hold the one for life the other in Fee without saying he shall have Fee if he lose both by default he may have Quod ei deforceat for the one and Writ of right for the other So if one grant a rent charge to another the Grantee may avow or have a Writ of annuity So in 9. E. 4.36 per. Litt. Grant 20. s. or a garment good because certain by the will of the Grantor So a Lease for so many years as I. S. shall name is good So Perkins Fol. 17. If I have a black and white Horses and I give one of them to I. S. this gift is good notwithstanding the incertainty by the election of the Donee And although it is not concluded who shall weigh and when yet it is good because there is an Officer in every Port which keeps a Beam and ought to weigh And although the Statute do speak of an agreement certain yet Law the reason aswaies exempts something out of the prohibition of the words of Statutes as 15. H. 7.2 by Keble a Prisoner which breaketh Prison by the words of the Statute is a Felon but if he break it when it is on fire not So 14. H. 7.29 Stamford 25. cap. 5. Jurors severed by a great Tempest shall not be Amerced and their Verdict good So W. 2. cap. 3. Gives not to a Fem Covert Receipt but where the wife is ready to answer yet the wife received by prayer in aid 20. H. 6.48 and there she is received where she is not ready to answer because otherwise she shall loose the recompence by warrantie So W. 2. cap. 1. say That Dones shall not alien yet 5. E. 2. is intended of their Issues so here for to avoid mischiefs c. Harris the Kings Serjeant to the contrary And he argued as the Kings Attorney did that is to say That the evidence which proves the agreement upon condition warrants not the issue which shall be intended a general agreement as if the Derendant in Trespass plead not guilty and give a licence in evidence or in formedon in discendre upon a gift in free marriage if the gift is traversed and a Deed is shewed of the gift in free Marriage the Remainder over in Fee or upon traverse of a Lease for years alleadged without Deed and the Deed is shewed in evidence this evidence warrants not the issue So here an agreement conditional maintains not the general agreement intended in issue the Collector could
the patol Demur in cui in vita per nonage of the second vouchee because he was not heir to the husband and so because penal here in savor of him it is restrained to the heir of the husband onely So by W. 2. cap. 11. an accomptant found in arrearages shall be imprisoned by Auditors and saith not when in 27. H. 6 8. In debt for arrearages of accompt it is adjudged That if the Auditors do not commit the accomptant to prison presently after the accompt and therefore the generality of time is restrained to a particularity by the rule of the Common Law in construction of Statutes and also by the intent of the makers for if the scope and end of the matter is satisfied all the matter and intent of the matter is accomplished and the scope of the Statute here was That the King shall have the Subsidie and the agreement here sufficeth for that because it authorizeth the King to weigh Woad by the Collector when he pleaseth and then the King hath Title of Action and so the surety of the King thereby is referred to will Also such agreement hath been allowed upon the same words of former Statutes for Subsidies Also if the Statute had expressed the agreement in certain yet agreement uncertain should have been good here and out of the penalty because the infringing of the words of the Law without the infringing of the intent of the Law for upon some accidents the law priviledges some things done against the words of the Law of the nature of the Law of this Realm and of other Realms and the Law of God viz. First for to avoid greater inconveniencies Secondly for necessity Thirdly by compulsion Fourthly by involuntary ignorance First for the avoiding of greater inconveniencies as 22. ass pl. 6. where a man of non sane memory and in his rage did great hurt and another man and his parents took him bound him and beat him with rods and here it is holden that they might justifie this in avoidance of greater damage being of non sane memory and yet the Law of nature and of the Realm prohibites battery but this particular case for the avoiding of greater mischief hath one exception and special priviledge So 1. H. 6.9 The Lord contrary to the Statute of Marlebridge may lead the Distress from the Land into another County where the Mannor is for it should be prejudicial to the Lord if he should not carry the distress to his Manor Amongst the Romans they had a Law That every one which should scale the walls in the night should be condemned to death and one in the night did scale the walls in the time of War to discry enemies to the Romans and he by the judgement of the Senate was not onely discharged but had a reward therefore so such interpreting of Laws is a tempering of the rigor of the Law Secondly necessitas non habet legem and therefore it is a good excuse in every Law as 38. H. 6.11 Increasing of water excuseth a default in a precipe quod reddat because he could not appear without danger of death yet the Law abhors every default because it is in contempt of the Court So David did eat bread for necessity although prohibited by the Law of God Thirdly compulsion excuses in Law as the avoiding of an obligation made by dares So if the arm of any man is drawn by compulsion and a weapon in his hand kill another this shall not be Felony nor he damnified because he did it by compulsion Fourthly involuntary ignorance doth excuse as 3. H. 7.1 Kell fol. 268. An infant killeth another it is not Felony because he hath not discretion and it shall be imputed to his ignorance which is involuntary by compulsion of nature so no default in him So Fitz. Nat. br 202. b. if one of non sane memory kill another because his ignorance by compulsion viz. the hand of God and such other things done by ignorance because not to be resisted and this involuntary ignorance is cause of the Act and therefore he which kills another by involuntary ignorance As by thâ— fall of a hatchet out of his hand shall have Sanctuary Deut. 19. But ignorance voluntary is not priviledged as if a man killeth another because this ignorance cometh by his own act and folly which he might have resisted and therefore shall not be priviledged because he himself was the cause of such ignorance if any were à fortiori in all the cases together before mentioned shall excuse for the Law is not offended for the said four causes the incertainty of the agreement here and therefore in as much as the Statute saith The Collectors not agreed with and so gives him authority to agree with the Collector and the Defendant hath made a special agreement with him which is an agreement and so within the words of the Statute if seemeth that by the rules of the Common Law used in construction of Statutes is by the intent of the makers and by all reason and equity shall be adjudged a sufficient agreement and warranted by the Statute and therefore demanded judgement against the King and so it was adjudged But all the Judges were of opinion against the King onely Hales and Montague and afterwards the King sent his Privy-Seal Colthirst against Bejushin 23. Trâ—… E. 6 in the Common Pleas. En Trespass the Defendant pleads a Lease for life to H. B. and E. his wife remainder to his son W. for his life si ipse habitaret residens esset in and upon the aforesaid Grange and Farm and if he should dye in the life time of H. and E. then to remain to B. the Defendant for his life if he also would inhabite there during the Term aforesaid and saith That W. did dye in the life of H. and E. and after H. and E. dyed also and the said B. now Defendant entred without shewing in certain when and took averment that he had inhabited there alwaies after his entry and upon this Plea the Plaintiff Demurs and it was adjudged against him for the Defendant 1. For that the averment of his continual residence is surplusage and therefore the incertainty thereof nil refert by Harris Hinde and Montague 2. It is not a condition compulsary but a thing elegible at the discretion of the Defendant by Montague and then his entry is not material but at his pleasure 3. Admitting that it be a condition yet it is subsequent and in defeasance of his Estate and therefore ought not to be shewed by him which shall have benefit thereby the contrary is of a condition precedent 4. For that it is pleaded by way of Bar and being certain to a common intent it sufficeth and it shall be intended that he entred immediately after the Remainder happened but by Hales Justice this common intent ought to be of a vehement presumption and not indifferent 5. That this word if W. dye then
thing shall be as this to which it is referred it As if a man make a Lease for so many yeers as I. S. hath in the mannor of D. there he shall have so many yeers as I. S. hath and shall take avermen that I. S. had so many issiut tale corodium quale I.S. nuper habuit So 11. H. 4. 20. H. 7. grant office taking such fee as I. S. which executed the same before had ought to be shewed what he had So 20. E. 3. the King granted to Litales liberties that the Town of N. had by shewing of the records or writings prove their liberties the grantee shall have the like Browning against Beeston LEase for yeers by Indenture by which the Lessee Covenants and grants to render and pay for that land 1 Mar in ba. Ray Trespass thirty seven pound yeerly at two feasts of the yeer naming them or within two moneths after at a certain place out of the Land and moreover Covenants grants if the said rent and farm of thirty seven pounds be areare and not paid at the time limited without any demand of the Lessor then the Lease shall be utterly void extinct and of no effect and that it shall be lawful for the lessor to re-enter and after the rent was not paid and before the entry the lessor maketh a new Lease and the first Lessee bringeth trespas against the second Lessee and he pleads the matter aforesaid and pleads the condition in this manner as in the Indenture is contained and saith not precisely that the Lessee had Covenanted as aforesaid And also said that the Rent was arear by the space of two moneths next after the said feast and adjudged for the plantiff for these two causes only 1. That the pleading of the Covenant which is contained in the Indenture that the first Lessee hath covenanted is not but a recitall and no express averment that he hath made such a Covenant in facio fol. 143. by Bromly 2. Because that the pleading of the Rent arear for two moneths varies from the Indenture which is after two moneths fol. 143. b. by all contrary to Catlin for he said that this is to be intended so if necessity Matters in Law are left at large but the better opinion was for the defendant If this Covenant and grant of the Lessee to pay thirty seven pounds yeerly be a reservation of the Rent or not and by Ramsey fol. 132 it is not 1. For that it is not issuing out of the Land by the way of Charge for pro terra implies a cause of the grant and is not words to Charge the Land 2. It is not a Rent service for default of words of reservation of the lessor as reddendum reservandum tenendum c. for this commences by words of the Lessee and which amounts not to a sum in gross because it goeth not with the revertion as he which hath Land on the part of the mother maketh a Lease for yeers by Indenture the Lessee Covenants and grants to pay to him and his heirs twenty shillings Rent the Lessor dies without issue the heir on the part of the mother shall have the revertion and on the part of the father the Rent for that it is a some in gross and not a Rent incedent to the revertion 3. It is not farm because it is not a Rent because they are all one 4. It is a void condition if it be a condition because it refers to the farm and Rent where there is not any such as a condition that the Feoffee shall infeoffe a Corporation which is not or his wife is voide because the first is impossible and the other against Law but the state because it is Precedent in defeasans of which they are made shall stand good Stamford and Walsh Justices fol. 134. It is a Rent first this Covenant and grant is equivalent to reservation and is by Indenture in which the words are the words of both and taken for the words of him which most aptly speaks them as a Rent upon a Feoffment Litl 47. is a grant of the Feoffee and in Judgment of Law shall dispose words which have substance formality and words there shall be taken indifferently For all parties assent and are privy to the speaking of them But words of a deed poll taken more available to the grantee 20. H. 7.8 by Brian and the Law expounds one word in the sence of another as 10. E. 31. 14. H. 8.2 21. E. 3.49 Reverter for Remainder So it taketh a word spoken by one for the word spoken by another and namely by Indenture and although it were not a Rent but a sum in gross yet it extends to it and to issue out of the Land for the Law because it is spetially alleadged the ground of payment of a sum to be for the Land and yeerly to be paid and the one is executory for the other For before fol. 71. if Land recovered by an elder title shall not pay which hath not the thing which ought to pay as 15. E. 4.4 if he may not have the ancient Pale he is excused to make a new so 9. E 4 10. if he will not give counsell the other shall stay the Annuity and 39. Assise 23. Rent for equality of partition charge the Land parted not mentioned because the Rent was granted and executory for the land So 2. H. 7 5. it shall discend to the heirs of the grantee without naming because it cometh in respect of the Land which should discend to the heir and when the ground of the matter appeareth the Law supplies the fault of the words because the Law respects the ground of the matter and consideration Gawdy It is not a rent fol. 136. in 39. H. 6.33 all the words shall be taken the words of one party viz. The first in the Indenture wherefore they are not the words of both because it estops not the other party and an estopple discends upon the Heir of him which is Heir at the Common Law because he is Son by the half venter neither Sister or Brother by the entire bloud and although they agree to have the same yet how viz. as a rent or not is not parcel of their agreement So it shall not be construed a rent because words may have a reasonable construction otherwise in 22. E. 4. in the case of the Prior of Bingham the Covenant was of a rent which shall be intended rent service the Fine saith not predictum redditum but was of five acres and was for the land and the Grantor was Tenant so holden there to be an annuity so here Morgan it is a rent f. 137. b. for the assent of the parties is the chief matter to be considered and not who speaks for the Lessor shall not have debt for the rent reserved unless it be a Contract and it is not a Contract without the assent of all and the words comming out of the mouth of
intent So proviso That the Lessee make such a thing So here it shall enure as a Condition in whatsoever manner it be called it shall enure as a Determination of the Leasee because it was made at the time when the Lease began If the second Lease admit it be a Condition shall be good before re-entry or not Ramsey fol. 133. It is not good because after the Condition broken untill he enters he hath but a Title because he may not grant and the Lease continues and the possession also And therefore 22. E. 4.37 Lesser shall not have Trespass untill entry 14.3 Ass 11. Distress estop his entry because it affirms the continuance of his Term. Where a man may enter he ought to enter or not have the thing and where he cannot enter he ought to make claim before he shall have it As a Reversion granted upon Condition which is broken the Rent is extinct without Claim for that he may not have it by Claim by Stamford and Walsh it is good fol. 136. for that the first Lease for years commenced by words without entry it may be determined by words without entry Lease for life not 2. Mar. fol. 142. because Livery and Seisen which gave the State and Entry which ought to be avoided by entry upon Condition broken it is expressed here how the Lease shall be avoided viz. by entry and there if he enters not or doth an Act which excludes him to Enter as the making of an acquittance or distraining there the Lease is good But the words here are utterly extinct dissolving the Lease without Entry and no Act after shall make it good and the words of the entry here are surplusage and take away the effect of the first words As to 22. E. 4. The Lessor cannot punish him because the entry was first with his assent and when the Lease ended he was Tenant at sufferance but he may make a Lease to another and it determines his will by Gawdy it is not good Void here shall be expounded void by Entry as W. 2. cap. 1. before fol. 82. Finis ipsojure sit nullus viz. to the right yet it is a discontinuance So by 8. H. 6. cap. 10 Outlary shall be void in Indictment or Appeal if no Capias in the County where he dwelleth Common Law 19. H. 6.2 expounds it shall be void by Writ of Error he that hath a possession in Law may Lease before entry after fol. 142. after a stranger hath abated not because another hath possession in Deed. So a Lease by the Husband for years shall not be void of the Wives land after his death before entry of the Wife for possession ought to be defeated by possession and possession ought to be gained by entry Catline fol. 142. b. By the not payment the first Lease is determined without entry because it may be made by word without other circumstance otherwise of Free-hold and therefore may make a Lease but cannot have Trespass without entry as Heir before fol. 137. he may make a Lease before entry but cannot have Trespess before entry 11. H. 7.22 So a Lessee may grant his Term before it commence 22. E. 4.37 yet he shall not have Trespass before entry 37. H. 6.18 To shew two matters where both are effectual and answerable makes a double plea as 3. H. 6.32 Feoffment up-Condition to infeoff the Heir and averment of the Collusion in Wardship of the body So 20. H. 6.7 Seisen in his Ancestor and himself by avowing So 22. H. 6.37 Two continuall claims viz. by the predecessor and the Plaintiff for to avoid a discent So 19. E. 4.4 by Vavisor and Brian Two discents in Fee bars not two discents is not double in Tail because one answer viz. he gave not makes an end of all for if he cannot shew one thing without the other it is not double nor if the one is pursuant to the other as fully administred and so nothing in his hands for the last is but a conclusion of the former But the other Justices held the aforesaid two exceptions effectual for the causes aforesaid and that the Rejoynder was vicious wherefore they said That it was in vain to argue them and therefore in consideration of them onely without respect to the other matters rising upon the Rejoynder and before debate they awarded for the plaintiff Throgmorton against Tracie M. Mar in the Common Plaes second deliverance A Man makes a Lease for life and after Grants the Reversion of the Land habendum the land at Michaelmas after the determination of the first Lease for life for one and twenty years and adjudged a good Lease for years of the Reversion and of the Land Reverting and that the Habendum stood well with the premises because that the land is the degree and state of the Grantor was included in the premises by the word Reversion and the degree and estate excluded by the Habendum and the other part onely granted viz. The land Reverting and so was the intent of both the parties Reversion is compounded of the remnant of the estate which is left in the Lessor and of the land Reverting and carties with him the land to be afterwards happening in possession and the land is the substance of both and by the grant of this both pass So the Mannor which is compounded of Demeasnes and Services and of stegno aqua priscarie 4. E. 3. or gurgite which consists of water and land The Habendum which is not pursuant to the premises is void as a grant of a Mannor Habendum a Rent parcell of the Mannor because in the grant it was Rent service and in the Habendum it is Rent Seck So a Grant of Services Homage Fealty and rent Habendum the rent to the Grantee in Fee this habendum is void because in the grant the rent was contained as a rent Service but here it is rent Seck Grant of it after the death of I. S. void for the nature of a Grant is that the thing Granted ought to pass presently after fol. 155. for it is a thing in possession and is granted as a Reversion where no Reversion was of it If one maketh a Lease of land for years and after maketh a feoffment of the same without livery it passeth not the Reversion by Attornment Quere because the Grant of a thing which includes all interests in it shall make the Reversion to pass but the Reversion granted shall not make the possession to pass 38. H. 6.34 and after fol. 399. The King Grants a Mannor to which an Advowson is appendant for life the Advowson passeth not nor if he grant the Reversion Habondum cum advocatione it passeth not because in gross because it was not mentioned in the first Grant but the Reversion of an Advowson may be parcel or appendant of or to a Mannor in possession not possession of or to the Reversion of a Mannor the Habendum passes not a thing not parcel nor appendant
or appurtenant unless it be comprised in the premises The Office of the Habendum is for to limit the estate as a grant a Rent and stay there is for life Habendum for a year is for one year 7. E. 3.10 by Trew 7. Ass 1. Perkins fol. 22. The Habendum repugnant to the premises void and the estate before the Habendum shall stand 14. H. 8.13 by Pollard Perkins fol. 34. Contrary 13. H. 7.23 by Fineux a Grant to one and his Heirs Habendum for Life So to two Habendum to the one of them two for life the Remainder to the other for life because it severs the joyncture in the estate So a grant of two acres to two Habendum the one acre to one and the other to the other because it includes the interest of every one in one acre A Lease of land reserving the profits or two acres except one void because parcel of the thing granted Doctor and Student fol. 98. Reversion is a Tenement and ought to vest presently as a Reversion and not at a day to come otherwise it is of land Reverting without estate and agreed of land by the Serjeants for the Defendant Every Deed shall be construed most strongly against the Grantor and if it may be taken to any effect by any reasonable intendment it shall be and the intent of the parties shall be observed as here of using this word Reversion not in its proper signification for then it first ought to vest as in Reversion presently by Attornment and not at a day to come but as a demonstration certain of the land viz. all the land that they have in Reversion and that they will not have the land to pass in the degree of a Reversion but in degree of Demeasne And the Law will That when the intent appeareth incline the words not apt of their proper and common signification to the intent and one word shall have the sense of another as Litl fol. 121. Dedi concessi by the Disseisee shall enure as a confirmation So 17. E. 3.8 Mannor pass by the name of Fee de Chivalry So 10. E. 44. 5. H. 7.1 plead Demise by words of licence to occupie where one word includes in it one thing as here Reversion includes the land the thing included shall pass by the word as 11. R. 2. Piscary pass per a quam and 40. E. 3.45 Soil by Piscary and by Turbary 7. E. 3.342 So Soil and Wear by Gorss for 14. E. 3. Formedon lyeth de gurgite So 6 E. 3.183 By the name of one acre cornubiensi for Cornish acres contain so many A man Grants his Remainder of one acre to have and to hold the same Reversion of that acre good because the Law respects the intent of the matter and applies the words to it So a Gift in Tail reserving the first three daies a Rose and after 10. s. good because one rent in substance A man seised of two acres Leases one for years and after maketh a Feoffment of both Livery in this wherein he hath possession by Attornment the Reversion of the other passeth 7. E. 4.21 So 30. E. 1. Totum Molendinum suum the Reversion of the third of the Mill which was in Dower pass but Tenant for life ought to Attorn upon the Grant Brook grants f. 30. the Habendum explains and corrects the words of the premisses as here the words Reversion of the land to the land it self being the same substance So 7. E. 3.308 A Rent Granted out of a Man nor to take off one acre of the same Mannor nothing shall be charged but this acre in performance of the intent of the parties by the Serjeants for the Plaintiff Anthony Brown Serjeant for the Plaintiff Tenement compriseth a Reversion as 33. E. 3. the King licences to purchase Tenements in Mortmain he purchases a Reversion good Fitzh grants 402. and Cook Alienation fol. 55. is Advowson yet the word Tenement here agrees not with the premisses First because that in the mean time after the first Lease finished at Michaelmas the land is in possession and then it is not a Reversion because no particular estate and therefore may not yest as a reversion as 21. H. 7.11 before fol. 25. Remainder may not vest but during the particular estate and not at the ending of the first estate up on Condition broken So 10. E. 3. dower of a rent reserved upon an estate Tail good so long as the estate continues otherwise it is if the Tail be altered in Tail after possibility or Tenancy by the Courtesie for that the inheritance is determined and the rent is now in another degree 12. E. 3. and 10. H. 7.13 by Keeble if a rent be granted with a cessing during the nonage of the Heir the Wife shall have Dower and Execution shall be staid otherwise the Wife of the Son dying within age for that during the Cesser she had not possession Secondly because the Reversion cannot be granted at a day to come for then he shall have the particular estate in the mean time and shall be Lessor to himself and 38. H 6.38 a man cannot reserve the lesser estate giving the greater without alteration of the Lesser as in 8. H. 7.3 by Vavisor before fol. 152. A. hath rent in Fee and grants this to B. after the death of I.S. void because the Fee passeth presenly if ever and then he should have Franck-tenement of his own grant until I.S. dies And the Estate shall not be so devided without alteration of the whole Estate for a thing in esse cannot be granted to be in esse one time and to be insuspended or differ from the other but a new rent may be granted to commence at a day to come for there he shall not have the particular estate in the mean time because not in esse before after fol. 197. Time material shall void the thing in all viz. both the premisses and Habendum not e converso if it may not pass according to the limitation thereof because time parcel of the parties intent and if it may not pass as to the intent all is void As a man hath a Rent or Term and Grant it if he stay there good if he saies besides Habendum after the death of I. S all is void after fol. 250. So the Remainder void if the Termor enter without Livery Litl 12. But if the Term was to Commence at a day to come the Remainder over there it is void notwithstanding Livery because there is no estate present to which the Livery may be annexed so that the time of Commencement is materiall and Livery before its Commencement is void and Livery shall not destroy the time but the time the Livery and grant every act shall be taken strongest against the makers and most beneficial to him to whom it is made and he hath liberty in another sence to his advantage then the words purport prima facie for every Deed shall be construed
Litl fol. 108. before fol. 140. two Tenants in Common grant 20. s. it shall enure as several Grants 34. ass fol. 11. Grants totum piscariam salvo stagno molendini sui yet the piscarie passes not for the stagno shall be excepted and not the piscarie because he hath a Reversion in the Propriety of the land and possession of the Ter-Tenancy The nature of an habendum is to give in large or qualifie Malitiosa juris interpretatio herere in verbis c. the words are but witnesses to the contract reversion includes land by all Brown Justice To the same intent of the Abbot and Covent and of Smith and his wife was to have the land pass as a Lease after the paticular estate ended and not otherwise and from that hour that their intent was to have the word reversion enure that way it seemed to him That the Law would warrant it for the land is included in the reversion for if it was not a man by Granting of a reversion could not have the Land in possession after the particular estate ended And a Feoffment of a Carue habendum the Mannor of D. is good if the Carue maketh the Mannor And if land is parcel of an Office it shall pass by the Grant of the office Much more he said tending to the effect to make the Lease good and so the Plaintiff shall recover Brook Chief Justice to the contrary Estate in lands includes land it self land is a generall word and contains Grantor and reversion particular words containing a Decree where one estate onely intent shall be inclined and ruled by the Law and not otherwise and intent nevertheless in certainty of words as 9. H. 6.35 Renuntiavit communium and not to whom void before fol. 122. 13. E. 3. Husband and Wife Tenants for life grant reversion of the Land that he holdeth by Homage Fealty and Castle gard the Lord grants all Services Castle gard passeth not because he granted not the Castle But in Testaments the intent shall be onely observed and rule the Law because the Teastator had not time by presumption to ordain all things according to the Law In conclusion he agreed that Judgement should be given for the Plaintiff Hill against Grange A Man maketh a Lease for years of a Messuage and an hundred acres of land appertaining to it 3. Mar in Common Pleas in Trespass c. by Deed indented the 6. of August rendring rent yearly payable at our Lady day and Michaelmas or 10 days after with clause of re-entry and after Grants the reversion and the Grantee the last instant of the 10. day after Michaelmas demands the rent and enters for not payment and it was adjudged that the entry was good for these reasons 1. Land may not appertain to a Messuage because both are things corporate simply otherwise of Advowsons waies c. which are things incorporate but things Corporate or Incorporate may pertain or be parcel of a thing compounded as a Mannor Castle Knights Fees Honors Forrests Monasterie Rectorie fol. 170. a. But here the land passes as appurtenant but by the intent and phrase of the parties as they have said usually occupied or let c. 2. The rent shall be paid at the first Feast of M. for otherwise it cannot be annual notwithstanding the other feast be first named 10. E. 3. the Abbot of Osneys case 3. The demand of the rent the last instant is good 4. That the Gantee of a Common person is an Assignee to have benefit of a Condition or Covenant fol. 173. a. and shall not be intended of the Pattentee of the King 5. That the Pattentee of the Heir and Successors of E. 6. shall take benefit of the Condition by equity of the said Stat. and not by the words Things of distinct and several natures the one is not parcel of or appendant to the other as 8. H. 7.1 by Keeble a Warren cannot be pertaining to a Leet nor a Leet to a Hundred nor one Office to another nor land to other land to a thing Compounded they may as a Mannor Knights Fee Honor Monastery Castle and a Village or to words general as are Oxgang a yard land a hide of land which contains land meadow pasture wood c. Messuage is a single word consisting of a thing special and not Compound nor a general word for that 27. H. 6.2 Land not parcel or appendant to a house and by demand of a Messuage in precipe land shall not be recovered and therefore pass not by the Grant of a House by the Serjeants on the part of the Plaintiff 23. H. 8. and 31 H. 3. by Feoffment of a Messuage with the appurtenances Land passes not a Mannor and things made appertaining to it are made by usage and continuance So 2. H. 7.28 land belonging to a Forrest and Warden of the Fleet and the house of the Master of the Rolls and divers farms to the Guardians of the Castle of Colchester and one Office to another as the custos brevium giveth one of the Offices of prothonatories and use and continuance is cause of it A man Leases a Messuage and land rendring rent be ought to demand the rent at the Messuage because most worthy Perk. 166. Meadow appertains to land 3. E. 3. by the Serjeants on the part of the Defendant Norwood against Read Action upon the case upon assumpsit made by the Testator 5. Mar â—…n K. Bench. lieth against the Executors adjudged For that the Testator could not gage his Law otherwise it is where he might gage his Law for the ignorance that the Law imputes of it to Executors and therefore there they ought to Demur but if they plead in Bar which is found against them they have lost the benefit of the Law and take Conusance of it whereof otherwise their ignorance shall excuse them 39. H. 6.19 12. H. 8.11 27. H. 8.23 Woodward against the Lord Darcie IF the Debtor make the Debtee his Executor and leaves him assets to satisfie the debt 5. Mar. Reso by the Judges of both Courts and dies the Debtee may pay himself by way of retainer by the Court 12. H. 4 21. according And in such case the Action is not utterly exstinct by the Administration for that the Law intends that he is satisfied by retainer before and so a thing in Action altered to a thing in possession by Act in Law for satisfaction of the party which hath no other remedy but if he hath not sufficient assets for to satisfie the debt the administration there extinguishes not the Action because that he cannot retain for parcel and have his Action against the Heir for the residue but ought to do the one for the other at his peril Wrotesly against Adams A Lease for 80. years of a Farm Tr i El. in Com. Pleas. Ej. firme the Lessor granted the Reversion of the Farm to a stranger to have and to hold the Farm for 60. years after the
end and expiration of the first Term of years the Lessor maketh a Lease for life to the first Lessee for years during the first Term and the second Lessee Enters and upon an Ouster bringeth Ejectione firme and by the Court it well lyeth 1. By the Law by a Grant of the reversion of the Farm the Farm and all the Demeasnes of it pass because it is nomen collectivum and certain in its self and so it was adjudged in the case of Bridges That by the Demise of the Farm the reversion and rent incident to it passeth 2. That the word Reversion shall be intended land reverting in the premisses and the habendum and not the estate in reverter which hath his continuance but in respect of the Term and during it it is a Grant of the reversion habendum the farm or land or reversion after the particular estate ended are all one 3. That the second Lease for years commencing by any determination of the first Lease whether it be in Law or in Deed and the expiration refers to the Term and not to the years Term is an estate in or for years and is finished when the estate is finished and this may finish when the years remain If a man marry with a woman Termor and the woman dies her husband shall have the Term for notwithstanding that the marriage hath not divested this out of the woman during coverture yet by her death this is given to the husband by Act in Law because it is a thing in possession and not in Action The Law is the Common use in Letters Pleas and Judgements and the Common Law is but common use by Anthony Brown fol. 195. Stradling against Morgan EXceptions alleadged in arrest of Judgement 2 El. Exchequer debt upon not guilty pleaded by the Defendant and found against him 1. The Plantiff hath shewed in his Declaration That the Defendant was then receiver c. and saith not That the Mannors were the Queens then and therefore shall be intended more strong against him then it should be to a common person and by consequence the Defendant is Baily to a common person by the Court. 2. That no receiver or Baily accomptant of a common person shall be within the Statute of 7. E. 6. c. 1 but onely of the Queen by the Court. 3. That the Action was not maintainable and the matter well alleadged lieth in the Queens Courts at Westminster notwithstanding the Statute of 34. and 35. H. 8. for Wales for that they are in the Affirmative and not in the Negative 4. That by this Statute an Action of debt by original Writ lieth for the forfeiture in the Exchequer howbeit that the party hath not cause of priviledge there 5. The Plaintiff ought to make mention of the Statute of 38. H. 8. and 7. E. 6. in his count for that the one is founded upon the other 6. He ought to shew expresly in his Count That the Queen was seized and made him her Bedel 7. Jeofails remedies not mispleadings in counts adjudged in Moon and Cliffords case In Debt the Plaintiff counts That whereas he was Bedel and Collector of certain Mannors by vertue of Letters Pattents of H. 8. and had a Fee for it the Defendant being Receiver of the said Mannor in 3. and 4. P. and M. took extortion for the payment of his Fee viz. 4. d. for every pound against the form of the Statute of 7. E. 6. the Defendant pleads not guilty and found against him And yet judgement given against the Plaintiff because the Count was incertain to whom he was Receiver and shall be intended against him then done to a Common person and a Receiver of a Common person is not within 7. E. 6. yet within the words for the intent of the makers shall be observed in the exposition of Statutes and so acts general in words have been expounded to be but particular where the benefit hath been particular As the King shall not have Wardship of lands which discends to the youngest Son but of that which discends to the heir general 12. E. 4. Stamford fol. 8. yet the Tenant dyed seized of others in Fee because the Statute of Praerogativa regis cap. 2. intends where the land is holden of the King and a Common person discended to the same Heir where one is Heir to the Tenant And Praerogativa Regis cap. 3. intends not that Soccage in capite shall give to the King primer seisen of lands holden of a Common person yet the words are general before fol. 109. Stamford Prerogative fol. 13. So Marlebr cap. 4. intends where Signiory and Tenancie are in the same County and therefore the Lord may bring a Distress taken in one County to a Mannor in another County of which the land is holden 1. H. 6.3 30. E. 3.6 before fol. 18. So Glouc. cap. 1. giveth Damages to the Disseisee against him which is found Tenant after the Disseisor for that he is Tenant by his own agreement and therefore the Disseisee shall not recover Damages against him which agrees not to a Feoffment made to him and others by the Disseisor yet he is Tenant but not Tenant by his agreement Litl Remitter fol 153. so long 5. E. 4. fol. 142. if he hath view in a precipe and afterwards abates the Writ for false Latine or for some other cause apparent he shall again have another Writ because there the Court might have abated this without motion For W. 2. cap. 49. although general intends where the Tenant abates the Writ by exception not apparent by 25. E. 3. cap. 16. by non-tenure of parcel no Writ abateable but for the quantity intends if the thing demanded be several as Acres but all the Writ shall abate where the thing demanded is entire as a Mannor before fol. 109. and the intent of the Statute never was contrary to the Text. By W. 2. cap. 25. if one fail of a Record he shall be a Disseisor yet a woman Covert shall not be 11. H. 4.50 nor infant because excepted by the intent yee in words hath included all So extenders shall not pay presently according to the words of Acton Burnel which ought to answer presently c. but shall be debtors presently with the duty and chargeable with the payment and daies payable of the rent or Revenues receiveable So by Exposition it seems against the Text of the Statute and is not because the intent of the makers guides them to it Of the part of the Defendant it was argued That the Action shall be sued there in Wales where the receipt is alleadged although that Wales is united to England by 27. H. 8. because by the same Statute Wales is divided into 12. Counties and by 34. and 35. H. 8. four Justices are appointed for wales viz. one for every three Counties and hold plea of all things within their circuit and one seal appointed for every circuit and all Actions suable there by the words of
the Devise shall be void So of an infant which maketh his will publisheth it and dieth at ful age it is not of any effect because death without good Commencement giveth not effect And so the Commencement and the intent of it is to be considered in every act So the Disseisee of two acres in Dale releaseth all his right in all Lands in D. and delivers the release as a scrowle to be delivered the first of May as his Deed the Disseisor before the first of May disseises him of another acre and the release is delivered the 10. of May the right as to the 3. acre shall not pass because the first livery was void to this intent so the consummation of it which is the second livery So I have a Reversion of two acres that I. S. holdeth for life after I purchase the Reversion of another acre which I. S. holdeth for life after I. S. Attourns to B. for all three the third acre passeth not for Attornment passeth not more then was contained in the intent of the first Grant And so here That which is not in the intent at the begining Commencement of the grant shal not be in the intent at the consummation of the same but if he had published his will after he had purchased the new Land there it may be all might pass for by the new publication his intent shall be taken That all that which the words contain at the time of the publication will pass and by him if a man Devise a thing by a name certain as the Mannor of D. or white acre and after purchase the same it shall pass for it shall be taken that he intended to purchase it or otherwise the Will shall be void to all intents 39. H. 6 18. But here when he hath 10. acres and Devises all his Lands they are satisfied in passing of the 10. acres and there is no meaning by the words for the land purchased after the Will because the thing is not named certainly as the Mannor of Dale or White-acre Also he may not Devise the 12. acres because by Dier the Statute 32. and 34. H. 8. cap. 1. and 5. intend that the Devisor shall be seized at the time of the making of the will because it speaks of having Lands which he may Devise and here he hath not those at the time of the Devise Quaere of the case where he Devises by special name and after purchases it because of the word having Second point if the Land vests in the Heir of the Devisor where he dieth in the Life of the Devisor Manwood for the Defendant Because it is more consonant to the will of the Devisor and reason That the effect shall take place and the form perish rather then both should perish together as Devisee for life the Remainder over dies in the life time of the Devisor it is a good Remainder and shall have the immediate possession which is the effect yet the form was for to have by Remainder So if a Dean die or a woman Covert taketh another husband before their Devisor dies yet they are especially named Land shall vest in the new Dean and his Successors and in the woman which is now the wise of another according to the intent because it cannot according to the words and if the intent of a man in Conditions shall be performed as 4. H. 7. by Joy he ought to infeoff the survivor and his heirs onely where the other dieth a fortiori the intent in Wils shall be observed where the words cannot and the effect here is that the Heir shall have the Land and it is the form of the limitation that he shall have it by discent 21. R. 2. Remainder Ecclesiae-Sancti Andreae in Holborn good And Parson shall take because it was comprehended in the Devise although he was not named Lovelas and all the Justices besides Walsh to the contrary For by the death of the Devisee the Devise is countermanded for that the Devisee is not in rerum natura when the Devise took effect and in all gifts be they by Devise or otherwise there ought to be a Donee in esse capable when the thing ought to vest or otherwise the gift is void and the word Heirs limits the estate and not the persons which shall take and enables the Devisee as well to alien as to permit it of Discent for a Discent to the Heir is but a thing subsequent to the estate of Fee-simple first vested in the Devisee and a thing at his pleasure And things of sequel which ensue if the estate had been vested first as are Discent Dower Escheat are not good causes to make things vest in others then those to whom limited And therefore the heir shall not have the land here no more then the woman shall have dower or Lord Escheat if he had died without heir which should be so if it had vested in the Devisee And therefore if a man Devise a Lease or goods to I. S. which dies and afterwards the Devisor dies the Executor of I. S. shall not have them The speaking to the Son of the Devisee That he shall be his heir c. is void for that the Statutes of 32. and 34. H. 8. gives licence and authority to every man to Devise his Lands by his last Will and Testament in writing and those are sufficient in themselves for to make the thing devised pass and not regard words without writing by all the Justices but if he had published the Testament of new the Devisee should have the 12. acres in this case for that it had been as it were a new Testament but not his heirs Delamer against Barnard A Man in 13. H. 8. makes a Feoffment to the use of himself and his wife in special Tail Remainder to the husband in general Tail 10 El in K B â—…r Remainder in Fee to the brother of the husband and after in 26. H 8. The husband maketh a Feoffment to A. which infeoffs the Brother being in Remainder in Fee 2. E. 6. The brother infeoffs the Defendant the Husband dies the heir of the first Feoffee enters to revive the use to the Wife and adjudged lawfull 1. By the Feoffment of the Husband in 26. H. 8. all the estate of the Feoffee to use is drawn out of him and setled in the second Feoffee and by consequence all the uses which were created out of the first Fee-simple are discontinued and shall not be revived untill a re-entry of the Feoffee after the death of the husband and that he may enter then notwithstanding the Feoffment of the Brother 2. The Feoffment of the Brother in Remainder is not warranted by the Statute of 1. R. 3. cap. 5. for that he hath not use in possession nor in esse but only a right which he could not grant neither shall it be executed by the Statute of 27. H. 8. but onely may pass by Livery by way of
thereof he entred this is a departure from the Bar for it is a new matter For the same reason a special agreement in evidence shall not maintain the general issue one witness is not enough nor one Juror for to try an issue if more were warned by the Sheriff 8. E. 3.50 So here the Defendant had but one witness which proves for him which is not sufficient and so judgement shall be given for the King Atkins for the Defendant A witness produced to prove a thing if he saith That he knoweth nothing of the matter his deposition is void so if he depose negatively as to say no more was not entred then so much and if no witness the knowing of the Jurors aid not the tryal of the matter and a Verdict given contrary to the testimony of witnesses good It is not needfull to aver that which of necessity must be intended as that the King hath a Beam there special agreement is an agreement as a Feoffment upon condition is a Feoffment and so this word Agreement includes every agreement by which the evidence well maintains the issue The Statute speaks not of surety and peradventure intends it not and therefore in vain to speak of it and therefore it may be he hath not answered to this exception Agreement in our Law is threefold viz. Executed at the beginning of it with payment intended by the Statute of 25. E. 3. cap. 3. which saith That goods bought by fore-stallers are forfeited to the King if the buyer had made agreement with the seller such agreement is not meant in our case because then the Statute should not be intended in the disjunctive for then the first and the second clause should be all one but the word Or disjoyns the clauses Agreement to an act made by another as in 20. E. 4.9 To a disseisin to his use maketh him a disseisor from the beginning so the party ravished to agree to the ravisher is an agreement executed here because nothing is to be done afterwards and agreement here may not be an executory agreement because the performance shall be afterwards yet both parties accord at one time before 26. H. 8. cap. 3. intends such because it speaks of payment or agreement for first fruits c. and common usage to pay after upon obligation made before proves this which intends agreement executory and here agreement is intended executory because it is not the first nor the second and an agreement executory is Duplex the one certain at the beginning as this of first fruits the other by matter ex post facto upon certainty to be known as here and such agreement executory the Statute will warrant for no Law will punish him in whom there is no default and where he cannot prevent the mischance by no possibility for the necessity of the matter and for that inevitable chance shall not prejudice any 20. H. 7.11 Fineus A man by the Common Law may kill another in his own defence or as a champion for the necessary safeguard of his life and the Tryal of right so notwithstanding the custom of the Realm new Natura brevium 94. b. If enemies of the King steal of Guests the Hoastler is discharged because he cannot resist So if the ship were on fire the casting of the goods on the land without payment or agreement for the Subsidie shall excuse the Defendant so here the extremity of the Tempest doth excuse the vigor of the Statute Sanders the Kings Serjeant Notwitstanding that an agreement conditional is included in the words of the Statute viz. The Collector not agreed with yet every Statute although it be penal shall be taken as the makers intended for the Statute of Waste is If any make waste in Lands which he holdeth by Demise c. yet if his Estate be Ex ligatione it shall be punishable in waste and yet the Statute gives Ex demissione onely suo de assignat and so it is holden 10. H. 6.3 But Gloucester cap. 5. W. cap. 14. nor Martebridge cap. 13. speaks nothing de demissione So quia emptores terrarum viz. W. 3. speaks secundum quantitatem terrae intend valore So 4. E. 4.12 An information for shipping Wooll without sureties of the carrying of Bullion according to the 14. E. 3. the last chapter holden good because the finding of sureties is not repealed by the general words of 36. of E. 3. cap. 11. which giveth the old custom of half a Mark for every sack after three years nor of 45. E. 3. cap. 4. which imposeth no charge upon Wooll other then Custom and Subsidie granted to the King and without assent of Parliament and the two last Staâ—intend not for to discharge Bullion but great Subsidies upon Wooll after 3. years so that the mind intent of the makers shall expound the general and doubtfull words of Star and abridge the generalty of them so here it shall be intended an agreement certain Also because the Commons pray the King That he will be pleased to accept of their Grant for that the words of the Statute which is their Grant shall be taken more beneficial for the King and most strong against the Grantors according to the Principle of the Common Law in case of a common person So the Statute of Prerogativa Regis 17. Ed. 2. Rastal wards 13. is the Grant of the Commons to the King which saith The King shall have the custody of all the Lands of such which hold of him by Knights service in Capite whereof the Tenants were seized in their Demeasne as of Fee at the day of their death of whomsoever they hold also by like Knights Service and notwithstanding that Fee is commonly taken to be Fee-Simple yet the King shall have of Tail because it shall be construed most strongly for the K. where it hath two intendments Agreements upon which the Common Law giveth no remedy are void and not good as in 19. H. 6.36 Upon an information for the forging of false Deeds the Defendant pleads Arbitrement made viz. That the Plaintiff shall not farther prosecute his Writ against the Defendant and saith also That the Defendant shall be non-suited in the Assize This is no Plea because non-suited founds not in satisfaction and cannot compell him to be non-suited for the award is not good if it be not executed wholly or the thing awarded may be recovered by action and therefore in 6. H. 7.10 In Trespass to say That he hath paid money but he hath not made his windows which the Heir may compel him to do for the concord is intire but wants execution in all and indeed before action brought is not good then it is performed yet not immediately and therefore it was held no Plea So in 27. ass pl. 5. A Baily known pledge the Ox of his Master for Wheat and if he pays not c. he shall keep the Ox alwaies This shall bind the Master because the wheat cometh to his use otherwise
by default against her and her husband had not any other remedy then a Writ of Right before the Statute of W. 2. cap. 3. which gives a Cui in vita and before W. 2. cap. 3. a faint Recovery against Tenant for life bound him in Remainder Litl Release 112. because the Law presumes the Title and case true So a Recovery upon a faint Title by a man of Religion was out of the penalty of the Statute of Religiosis untill W. 2. cap. 23. made a Recovery without Title in such plight as a Feoffment in Mortmain was for the truth supposed by the Law to be therein So here the Recovety is intended to be true and therefore the Plaintiff ought to shew matter if there be any to prove the contrary As in 11. H. 4.19 if the Tenant in a precipe vouch one of the Demandants he ought to shew cause because otherwise the Law will presume that he hath not cause against right So 15. E. 4.4 Contrary entry by Title general averment of Covin by the Plaintiff in Dower was not held good Matter in Law As to the matter in Law it seemeth here that the case is clear out of the words and penalty of the Statute of 11. H. 7. cap. 30. For although 27. H. 8. hath executed the Possession to the use yet this case remains here so as if 27. H. 8. had never been made and the Wife had continued Tenant in Tail in use and out of the words of the first branch because he hath an Estate Tail in the use in the land but hath not an Estate in the land in the use and the Statute speaks of an Estate in the Land and this Hereditament or use which is the matter and substance and the use it self which is the confidence of the thing differ But one may not have the state in Land and use also because suspended yet two may to the use of one of them as Husband and Wife to the use of the Wife and so it shall be intended here Also the first branch speaks of lands c. of Inheritance or purchase of the Husband but here the use is a new thing which Commenceth now and was not in being before and so is not the inheritance or purchase of the Husband and therefore out of the Statute as a Rent granted to one out of lands to the use of the Wife of the Grantor or if the Husband gives a signiory in Tail to the Wife for her Joyncture and the Tenancie Escheat and the Wife suffer a faint Recovery this is forth of the Statute So the Husband makes a Feoffment upon Condition to re-enfeoffee him and his Wife in Tail the Wife suffers a faint Recovery this is out of the Statute because the Feoffment of the Land from the Possession of the Husband and was her purchase and not the purchase of the Husband or his Inheritance for the Condition which is the cause of the gift is a new thing is not within the second branch because the Wife had nothing here of the gift of any of the Ancestors of the husband Nor the third branch because the wife had not possession by the Statute nor by the Feoffees to the use of him in Reversion but he in Reversion hath the present Title and so the Statute shall be intended and therefore he may enter presently If Tenant for Life suffer a faint Recovery but 11. H. 7. saith Enjoy according to their Title intends that he shall not Enter until after the death of his Ancestor because he hath no Title in the life of his Ancestor And therefore when the Wife assents to the Ravisher 6. R. 2. gives title of entry saying habeat titulum intrandi c. intends that he shall not have it in the life of the Ancestor And if the makers of the Statute of 11. H. 7. had intended that the issue in Tail should have entred presently they would have given to him Title by such like words as the Statute of 6. R. 2. hath but the end of the clause which saith That they shall enjoy according to their Title expresses that they intented not so For which causes it is probable that the Defendant is out of the penalty of the Statute and that the Plaintiff might not enter and so shall be Barred Whiddon Serjeant for the Plaintiff Because the Defendant hath said whose Heir he is he shall be taken that he is Heir special for a Plea which hath two intendments shall be taken most strongly against him which pleads it as 3. H. 7.2 in Trespass Release generally is no Plea because it may be taken to be delivered before the Trespass or after So 3. H. 7.8 and 9. and 26. H. 8. Entry to avoid Warranty Collaterall pleaded in Bar is no Plea because it may be intended after the discent for he may enter in the life of the Ancestor or after Also the Plaintiff need not shew how he is Heir because he was once seised by entry But if he had brought a formedon upon the Estate Tail he should because by way of Demand as 6. E. 4.1 Executor brought Trespass for a thing taken out of his Possession he shall not shew his Testament but if he Demands a thing whereof he had not ever possession he shall It is not needfull to shew Covin certainly which is a secret thing and the Law doth not enforce one to shew a thing when by intendment of Law it lieth not in his Conusance as 20. H. 7.7 A woman shall have Dower of a Rent Charge without shewing the Deed of the Grant because it belongeth not to her So the Lord shall have Covin generally for the Ward where his Tenant aliens and re-taketh for life the Remainder to his Heir being it lieth secretly in the breast as suspicion lieth for that he may justisie imprisonment for suspicion of Felony without shewing of the cause of his suspicion So 33. H. 6.5 In Trespass a man buys in a Market Overt the Plaintiff said That the said buying was by fraud between the Defendant and a stranger generally without shewing any thing speciall of the Covin and the Plea the e admitted good So in a Precipe against the Lord of ancient Demeasne and Tenant the Lord shall shew that he is Lord and this Action is brought against him by Covin generally So 9. E. 6.41 He which alleadges Covin ought to shew cause of the Covin and the cause is for that the Recovery or Title was tryed by Verdict because to say that it was by Covin shall not be intended true against a Verdict But Covin generally may be averred against a Recovery not gainsaying or default because this is cause of the Judgement and no Triall Wherefore in this case a man shall aver that this was by Covin generally And as to that which hath been said That execution ought to be shewed of the Recovery that needs not For the Statute speaketh only of the Recovery and without Execution it shall be
a Recovery as a Fine is without Attornment for the habere facias seisinam recites cum A recuperavit seisinam suam c. because the Husband raised the use First it is his purchase and so within the words of the Statute and if not yet it shall be within the equity and nevertheless it is penal Sanders for the Defendant The Statute here is penal because it goeth in avoidance of Estates and abridges power and therefore not equitable And for this Statute of W. 2. cap. 14. before fol. 17. expectet emptor for Warranty because he vouches an Infant and yet it is adjudged 18. E. 4.16 If he maketh a Feoffment over this Feoffee shall vouch because penall against one shall not extend to another So by 32. H. 8. cap. 33. The dying seised of a disseisor without peaceable possession before for five years shall not take away the Entry of the disseisee yet if one Abator die seised within five years this discent shall take away the Entry And so if Tenant for life be disseised and the disseisor die within five years and the Tenant for Life dieth he in Reversion or Remainder may not Enter because he was no Disseisor to them and to the discent they had no Title to Enter but the Tenant for Life and taken strictly because it abridgeth the Liberty given by the Common-Law By inheritance is understood Land by dicent as it is proved by a case in 7. H. 4.5 and a cui in vita abated because it was quam clamat esse jus Hereditatem suam whereas it was his own purchase And by 4. H. 5. cap. 3. which speaketh of Lands by purchase or by discent and the disjunctive prove the difference between the words Purchase intends Land by gift or purchase which is by Title Disseisen is not purchase because without Title Now because the Plaintiff hath in the Replication said That the Grandfather of the Defendant was seised in Fee for to prove the Defendant to be within the first Branch the Plaintiff ought to shew here how the Husband of the Defendant came to the Possession for the manner of coming to the Land is Issuable because it may be by Discent Purchase or Disseisen And a Joincture made by a Disseisor to his wife is out of the Statute Recovery without Execution is not a discontinuance Harris Serjeant argues to the same intent And he taketh also that Covin cannot be where the Title is good except that wrong be done by him which hath the Title and this ought to be shewed for here in respect that the Title is confessed to be good in this That it is not traversed nor confessed and avoided this Recovery may not be averred to be by Covin for this avernment is repugnant in it self and it cannot stand together to say that she did right by Covin And as to the Statute he taketh the case here to be out of the words of the Statute And note thou that he argued to all the other points moved to the same purpose that they were arguod before Molineux Justice It is a vain thing to aver this specially which is apparant as the Covin and therefore when the Tenant infeoffes his Son within age by Collusion the Lord shall seise him for a Ward without shewing this Collusion specially So if the Husband will confess an Action the Wife shall have Dower by the Common Law proved by recital W. 2. cap. 4. For it is intendable by the Law to be Covin apparant but it was doubted if the Recovery had been by Default but here the Action had been tryed by the Verdict of 12. men the cause of the Covin ought to have been shewed because the Law giveth credence to it As 5. H. 7.20 Upon an Attaint no Supersedeas shall be granted because the Law presumes the Verdict to be true untill the Reversal be tryed upon Error in Deed or Record so that the Law hath an indifferent judgement of it viz. to be true or false And so the Covin averred in the avoidance of the trial by Verdict shall be shewed certainly for the credence given to the Verdict Also Covin upon a good Title is prohibited because the Statute of 11. H. 7. is generall And so Covin generally averred here without falsifying of the Title is good as 4. H. 7. cap. 20. saith That if a Recovery be pleaded in Bar of a popular Action the Plaintiff may aver it was by Covin generally by the Warrant of the Statute As to the second exception the Stat. expounds it self to be intended of a Recovery without execution Every Fee-simple is an inheritance and then she had an use in the inheritance of her Husband and held that the Wife held the inheritance of her Husband that is to say his Land in use joyntly with her Husband and so within the words of the Statute and if not it shall be within the equity and intent of the Statute and he took without question that the Heir in Tail might enter presently and our the Wife which is Defendant and so held the Plaintiff should recover Hales Justice to the same intent And first to the Covin the Replication is good without shewing cause of it And the Statute is for frail inconstant women and will not make them Judges if the Title of Action be good or not 18. R. 2. cap. 17. gives receipt to him in Reversion where the Tenant for Life is impleaded by Covin of the demandants that the Tenements shall be recoverred and he in Reversion because it speaks generally of Covin 2. H. 6.14 and 11. H. 4.3 For this cause there it sufficeth to say That Tenant for Life pleaded faintly and pray to be received without shewing cause otherwise it is of Covin at the Common Law and 11. H. 7. would have limited the pain to fained recoveries expresly if it had intended so much And the Statute prohibits the Covin onely be the Title good or faint for faint Recoverie by Covin the issue in Tail may falsifie before Warranty made 20. years after the Disseisen yet it commenceth by Disseisen by the intent As if the Father Disseiseth the Son to the intent to make a Feoffment with Warranty to Bar his Wife Recovers against one which outs the Tenant by Covin yet she had not good Title of Dower is a Disseiseress and Covin is apparent here because he never took view voucher essoin or other delays which he might The Statute saith That the Recovery shall be void whereby it is not intended that it shall be executed and shall not be intended to be by Disseisen without shewing The words of 11. H. 7. explain the intent That such Wives who have Lands in use or use in Lands are within the Statute Recovery against Tenant in Tail was good onely for his life before this Stat. and therefore comprises use here because the Stat. shall not be made in vain for Tail in use may do as great prejudice as Tail in possession and so the
H. 6.25 Of vigor of an appeal pleaded against an excomunication the usuall form shall be observed and good as in debt when the defendant acknowledgeth himself to be bound c. So in forgery against one only quod falsa conspiratione habita good 11. H. 6.2 because the usuall form where a man may not have by common intendment precise notice of the certainty of a thing it sufficeth to alleadge this generally as 21. H. 6.9 9. H. 7.15 that executors have administred to B. without shewing what things good because he may not know that another hath administred and that he is not privy So 5. E. 4.8 Obleige to discharge the Sheriff of all things touching his office he said that he had discharged him generally good because for the infiniteness of it Talbot and Corbets case tempore H. 7. upon the same Statute 23. H. 6. where the issue was joyned that Corbet was chosen Knight for the Parliament and he was admitted to prove it c. So 2. E 4. 19. imprison to make an obligation to the defendant to others unknown without naming them good contrary in false imprisonment So 10. E. 4. 19. bound for to serve in all lawfull commands he said that he had served him lawfully untill such a day without shewing in what good So in 12. H 7.14 he had found him meat drink and apparel untill one and twentd yeers without shewing what good So monstraverunt homines without shewing the number because a great number for the Law compels not to shew the certainty of the thing which is not to be known or remembred Brook Chief Justice so 128. and in Parliament the most voices in the upper house shall be numbred by the Clerk of the house for every one there shall be severally demanded otherwise it is in the house of Commons for there the assent is tryed by voices sounding all at one time So in election of Coroners Sanders so 126. the County of Chester was alwayes parcel of the Realm of England yet Knights and Burgesses came not from thence untill the Statute of 34. 35. H. 8. ca. 13. Statute penall extends not further then the words and namely for to punish others as 21. H. 7.21 of malefactors in Parks extends not to Forrests So 13. H. 6. cap. 10. that Sheriffs shall not let their Counties extends not to him which Leases parcel of it 21. H. 7.36 the contrary was held 20. H. 7.12 and before fol. 87. So treble dammages for a forcible entry in an Assise or trespas extends not to entry in the nature of an Assise 7. H. 4. which limit order for the election of Knights extended not to the false return of the Sheriff untill 11. H. 4. was made if London inlarge the Ancient custome viz that a villen shall not be drawn out which hath remained there a yeer and a day because Ancient demeansne 7 H. 6.32 extends not to enlargment So England altered not the subjecton of Wales Rape is made fellony by W. 2. ca. 34. Abetters inquirable cap. 12. and at one time good 2. E. 2.22 E. 3. yet Chapter the 12. seeme to be intended of fellons before made and not by the same Statute Sanders justice the allegation alledged under the viz. is a plain precise and effectuall affirmation in deed proved by Rules in grammer the authority of Latine Authors by the Register 66.160 natura brevium 63.134 h. 135. b. and the opinion of the Doctors of the Civill Law 21. E. 4.49 and after so 143. by Catlin an Abbot in discharge to be collector saith inter Record of such a term continetum that R. 2. had granted to his predecessors that he nor his successors shall be collectors and naught for it may be contained amongst the Records and yet no Record escuage was first invented to suppress the Welch and Scots rebels against whom war was made by the King of England as against Rebels and not as against enemies for that they were subject to England H. 3. made E. 1. his eldest son Prince of Wales and so it hath continued to this time which Act of H. 3. was the first alteration of Wales King E. 1. made the Statute of Snowdon The third was the Statute of 27. H. 8. the welch may sue by quod ei deforceat in the nature of what action they will Statutes sometimes explaines the Common Law Merton cap. 2. quod vidua legare possunt bluda c. and late Statutes aided by equity Statutes made before so lineal warranty Bars not the issue in taile without assets by the equity of Glocester made long before after fol. 78. so Land delivered in execution by the Statute of Marchants 1â— E. 1. yet it shall be delivered also to so high extendors although 13. E. 1. speaketh not of it by equity of Acton Burnel 11. E. 1. cap. 2. which giveth goods prised at two high prises in dammage and that the Connusee shall have them for the price because it intended to aide things in like degree although not in esse then Brown Justice to the same purpose and said that in things touching Grammer their predecessors have consulted with Grammarians and pursued their Rules as it appeareth in our books that the the Judges have said proximo antecedenti fiet Relatio the which sentence they might take out of Grammar and he argued that licet was a plain affirmative and that the matter contained under the licet is an affirmation with greater vehemency then it should be without the licet and that the licet augments the affirmation And he argued further that the generall words of the Statute of 27. enabled the plantiffe to take benefit of the penalty and in what he said agreed with Sanders in effect Brook chief Justice Gavel kind commenced by the Brittans by partition of England Scotland and Wales between the three sons of Brute continued by Bellinus Brennus Ferrex and Porrex and was altered in England by the conquest of the Saxons and the eldest son by their Law was inheritable But Gavel kind continued in Wales until 27. H. 8. for it was not conquered Priviledges within certain precincts or Dominions followed not the enlargement of the place So 38. H. 6.10 Liberties granted to the Bishop of Durham in feedis suis extends not to the purchase after So 21. H. 6. Warren is granted to B. in all his Lands in Dale and he purchaseth other Land in Dale he shall not have warren there So a grant of Conusans of Pleas of a thing parcel of the mannor of Dale tenancy Escheats afterwards he shall not have of it For the grant taketh execution of his precinct and circuit at the time of the making of it and the services shall be then parcel of the mannor and not the demeans which now escheat So grant wreck to B. in all his Lands it shall not extend to the Land of which he was then disseised because not his but the disseisors pro tempore Reference to another
naturall body so may he purchase As 34. H. 6.34 and by pleading there H. 6. seized in fee of an Advowson in gross conveyed it from H. 5. to him who granted it to the plantiff good without shewing in jure Coronae or how and there if the King hath Land parcel of the Crown and parcell by purchase and dies having a son and daughter by one venter and a son by another who enters and dies without issue the daughter shall have the Land purchased and the son the other So purchased Lands by the King shall go to the naturall body So 35. H. 6.28 by Moyle after fol. 247. Land in Gavel-kind given to the King and his heirs the eldest son being King shall not have all because it vests in his naturall body but perquisites of a villaine the King hath jure Coronae as 41. E. 3.21 if a Bishop who hath a villain in the right of his Church enter he shall hold it in his body politick and shall be in the right of his Church because the signiory was for a thing in respect or by reason of another shal be in the same degree and right as the principal was at the Common Law That an estate of inheritance viz. Fee-simple was by the Common Law before the Statute First absolute when a gift was made to a man and his Heirs Secondly conditional when to him and the Heirs of his body for that formedon in Reverter at the Common Law if the Donee dies without issue in Remainder not for a remainder cannot depend upon a Fee Conditional until this Statute and before this Statute the Donee might alien after issue had so bar the issue because they construed the having of issue to be a performance of the Condition which was implied in the words and in the intent of the Donee and after issue to be as an absolute Fee because he had such heirs which were limited But if before the Statute the Donee had issue he might alien and good then here 4 E. 3. and 30. E. 1. which was contrary to the will of the Donor for which the Statute was made and then Fines were of great regard yet by this Statute ipso jure sit nullus viz. as to the right issue or Donors the Kings prerogatives are great yet the Common Law so admeasures them that they take not away any of the inheritances of the subject and therefore the King shall pay Toll though not for things bought yet Toll Traverse he shall because it is for going over another Soil because it toucheth the inheritance to permit a way over his Soil without paying any thing 46. E. 3. 23. H. 3. 35. H. 6. 26 28 29. So for to wave a Demurrer or issue yet may not change one issue into another Term because then it would be infinite which should be to the disinheritance of another 13. E. 4.8 Statutes general made in preservation of inheritances or for the publick good binds the King without naming as W. 2. c. 5. of usurpations but by 35. H. 6. good is not so clear if an infant upon whom the King usurps hath by purchase as well as discent So Merton cap. 5. That ordains that the Kings Ward shall not pay usury viz. That the Rent shall not be doubled during the Nonage of the Heir and therefore in 35. H. 6.60 by Needham if the King gives land rendring Rent yearly at Easter and if he fail to pay at the day That he shall double the Rent the Grantee dies his Heir within age he shall not double the Rent against the King So Merton cap. 6. That a man shall make his Attorney for to follow his suit to the King if it be his Lord or at the Court of another he shall do it So the Statute of 5. H. 5. of additions L. 5. E. 4.32 of one Law which belongeth to a common person the King may not defend the Common right but that every one shall have advantage but every general Statute shall not bind the King without naming of him As Magna Charta cap. 12. Communia placita c. nor such which have an intent onely between subjects and to repress disorder between them those here which concerneth salvation of inheritance or publick utility of the Realm So the Statute of gifts Conditional binds the King because by Justice and Act of Parliament the King hath submitted his will to the Donor The King as Walsh saith hath in him First power to do Secondly Justice to enforce him to do it this is as to others Thirdly Mercie to stay him from doing this is of things touching himself And because after this Statute the King may not say that the estate is Fee-simple Conditional as it was before the Act the case of the Tenant in Tail attainted of Treason was alleadged in proof of it 37. H. 8.7 7. H. 4.32 which proves that the King shall be bound by the said Statute So by 26. H. 8. cap. 13. because it is some estate of inheritance also the Tenant of the King in Capite gives in Tail Tenendum de capitali domino the King shall not have Wardship of the issue in Tail 4. H. 6.19 because it is not now Fee Conditional as before the Statute and therefore he is not immediate Tenant to the King 4. H. 7.16 The King may receive the Services of the Donor by his hands 27. H. 8.26 after fol 249. the King may take the Donor or the Tenant in Tail for his Tenant before Licence or after but once chosen shall not resort Also 8. H. 4.9 Tenant in Tail of a Signioty aliens it in Mortmain for default the Signiory revolts to the King the King seises the Land after escheat the issue in Tail hath the land by petition against the King and therefore is not Fee-Conditionall as to the King but binds the King although in these cases the King claims in the right of the Crown yet here it is very remote from the prerogative because here it remains vested in the natural body of H. 7. For the Plaintiff it was said That the Prerogative of the natural body of the King because of the union of the politick as the attainder of H. 7. discharge ipso facto as soon as he came to the Crown 1. H. 7.4 So R. 3. being Feoffee to uses when he was King the use was gone because the King in his body politique may not be seised to an use of another 5. E. 4.7 and therefore it was enacted 1. R. 3. cap. 5. Rastal Uses 3. That the Land should be in Fee to him to whom the Use was 43 E. 3.22 Franchises extinct by purchase of the King yet to him and his Heirs of a Mannor to which they were appendant So the King in his natural body and another purchase or if the purchase is before that he is King they are not Joint-Tenants but Tenants in common Fitz-nabr f. 32. G. because no body politick may hold in Joincture So 44. E.
Return of summons of the Exchequer because it concerneth the King himself there So 2. R. 3.4 2. H. 7.7 The Kings Grantee of Amerciaments of his Tenants shall not have the amerciament of his Tenant which holdeth of him and another because it is before other Tenants as well as my Tenant Charters of the King taken according to common intent and other things which have not common intent shall not pass from the King by his Charters And therefore 3. E. 3 the King Grants to an Abbot That he and his Successors shall be quit of repairing of Bridges Cawseys and Walls it discharges not him for repairing of such which he hath been used to repair by prescription as Lord of the Village but it is good otherwise of a Town to which the King hath Granted Murage Pannage or Pontage So 9. H. 6.56 before fol. 243. The Grantee of the King with Warranty shall not have in value without precise words but he may rebutt So 2. H. 7.6 The Grantee of the King of all Fines and Amerciaments in such a County he shall not have Amerciaments if the Sheriff Coroner or other great Officer is Amerced because Royal and a Grant shall enure for common things in intendment So 43. E. 3. ass pl. 15. The King Grants to his eldest Son the Dutchie of Cornwall cum omnibus Wardis Maritagiis c. And one which held of the Dutchie by Knights Service and which held also of one which was in Ward because of Ward by Knights Service dieth his Heir within age the Prince shall not have the Wardship of him but the King because a thing pertaining to the Crown passeth not without special words So the King maketh a County Palatine and giveth to another and Jura Regalia and that Pleas within the County shall be determined there yet he himself shall sue at Westminster his actions arising within the County Palatine as 3. E. 2. For an advowson in the County Palatine of Durham the King brings his Quare impedit in the Common Pleas the Defendant pleaded to the Jurisdiction of the Court and was compelled to answer So an Abbot by the Kings Grant made to him for the amortizing of Land or Tenements may not purchase an Advowson holden of the King in Capite and this case by Wray differs from the case in 41. ass pl. 19. before fol. 332. for there the Charter names the house but names not what Lands by which it cannot be intended that the King was mistaken in the Tenure and therefore it is good there and not for the cause of Ex gratia speciali So 19. E. 3. he might not appropriate an Advowson holden of the King by licence to appropriate So 1. H. 7 23 and 26. A sanctuary for Treason shall not be without speciall Words Ex merâ—… motu c. will not pass other things then the nature of the words contain And therefore the King Grants to a man and his Heirs males excerta scientia c. passeth not inheritance 28. H. 8. A Felon may not wage battail against the King because dangerous for the King Stamford fol. 180 and 182. nor against those of London in an appeal by the Kings Grant 20. E. 3. So if one takes the Kings goods wrongfully the King may seiz his goods until restitution and 8. R 2. if any take Toll of those of the Town of Lynn they may by the Kings Grant take withernam of those another time within their Jurisdiction And so the King conveys not from the Prerogative of his person to the person of another a fortiori he may here where the thing is not but Revenue or profit These words ad humilem Petitionem Comitis deminisheth the force of the Pattent by Catline by Plowden if Gold or Silver will not defray charges the King shall not have it because no mettal without them but because the party shewed it not as our case is the Queen shall have Judgement And this point was not put to the Judges to adjudge because that the Defendant confessed that it contained gold which is intended to be of good value because the best for the King Bret against Rigden A Man seized of 10. acres Soccage Devises all his Lands by writing Tr. 10. El in the Com Pl. Repl. and after purchases 12. acres Soccage and the Devisee dieth the Devisor saith to the Son of the Devisee That he shall be his Heir and have all the Land that his Father should have had if he had survived him and dies Adjudged that he shall not have the 12. acres 1. If the Devisee shall have the Land purchased by the Devisor after the making of his Will Manwood for the Defendant said That it shall be presumed that every one knows the Law in acts indifferent and that the Will is of no effect until the death of the party for ignorance of Law excuses no man and the date and writing of the Will is not effectual but the words of the Will shall be construed as they were spoken at the time of his death And therefore if a man Deviseth a Mannor in Fee a Tenancie escheateth and after the Devisor dieth the Devisee shall have the Tenancy because parcel of the Manor at the death of the Devisor when the Will taketh effect yet when the will made not A woman Deviseth Land and after takes husband which dies the Woman dies the Devise is good because she is discovert when it took effect as she was when she made her will and marriage cannot countermand it which was not of effect in her life Also because it intends no exception for the generality of the words As if she had Devised all her plate and after bought plate and died the Devisee should have all his plate at the time of her death for the ampleness of his words declares his intent to be benificially taken for the Devisee Lovelas and all the Justices for the Plaintiff to the contrary That Land purchased after the making of the Will cannot pass by the words nor intent of the Testator because he had not the 12. acres at the time of the writing and publication of the Testament it is no presumption that afterwards he would have and is as if he had died when he writ and published the Will and therefore cannot have an intent to give it and the death which is the Confirmation of the Will follows the first Acts thereof viz. the writing and publication of it for every Act founded upon discretion consists of 3. parts The first Inception which is writing of the Testament here The Second Progression which is the publishing of the Testament begun The Third is Consummation which is the self same and continues one through all these parts or otherwise the Act is void of discretion And by Lovelas it is proved That the Commencement is to be considered in Wills because if a woman Covert Devise Land by her Will and publish it and her husband dies and after she dies
in force until after the Proclamations that then it shall barr tayl because otherwise the Proclamations are in vain for to give notice of the Fine if the party cannot defeat the Fine before all the Proclamations ended by Entrie Claim or Action Tenant in tayle of land grants a Rent by the render of a Fine or grant the nomination of an Advowson by the Rendor or Tenant in tayle of a Rent disseises the Tenant of the land and levies a Fine of the land and Proclamations passe this is no barr to the issue because the Fine was not levied of the thing intayled by Thorneton but if Tenant in tayl of a Rent Advowson Tithes Common c. levies a Fine and dies and after the Proclamations passe the issue is barred by the Statute yet the Fine was not a discontinuance because things which lie in grant but there he may claim where entrie lieth not and good for to defeat the Fine and Proclamations and to save the tayle But if Proclamations passe a Formedon depending the issue is barred by this Statute of 32. H. 8. otherwise it is if one if one brings an Action within five yeares upon the Statute of 4. H. 7. and the five yeares incure hanging the Action because 32. H. 8. favours not estates tayle and is stricter against them then 4. H. 7. against a stranger because 4. H. 7. allowes benefit to a stranger to persue his Action within five yeares 32. H. 8. before the Proclamations incurred nor without recovery also Lease executory grante by the render of a Fine by tenant in tayle shall be good against his issue after Proclamations incurred after the death of the father If a man makes a Lease for 21 yeares or for life to one and presently maketh a Lease for one and twenty yeares of this to another by Indenture or by Fine rendring Rent the Lessor shall have an Action of debt for the Rent by reason of the Estoppell for every one is Estopped against the other to say that the possession passeth not but if the second Lessee enters and be expulsed by the first Lessee he may well plead this matter in Bar against the Lessor in an Action of debt And so rent by Estoppell avoyded by entry and expulsion Tenant in tayl maketh a Lease for fourty years to commence ten yeares after rendring Rent and the next day dies the issue enters and infeoffs I.S. within the ten years and after the ten years the Feoffee waves the possession and Lessee enters and payes the rent to the Feoffee which accepts it Now he hath made the Lease good for by the Feoffment the Lease was not avoided because it was an Act indifferent and Eligible and he could not make his Election before his time and then this Election affirms or disaffirms a voidable Lease And if one entry of the issue avoids not a Lease executory A forliorâ— a descent of the Remainder where entry fails shall not avoid it but a rent charge he shall because there the issue hath not Quid pro quo and to his disadvantage the entry of the issue and Feoffment over dischargeth the Rent charge granted by his Father 14. Ass pl. 4. So one Statute 9. E. 3. contrary but no Law by Plowden and Bromley for that the Remitter dischargeth the Execution as well as the Rent charge Trees sold by Tenant in tayl and not severed in his life the bargainee shall not have them 18. E. 4.6 If the Plaintiffe prayes not the Prothenotary to enter his judgement nor pay for it the judgement shall not be entered without the order of Court Davies against Pepys THe obligee may charge the Heire or Executor at his Election where they both have assets P. 15. El. in the common Pleas. Debt but not doubly for if he be satisfied by the one the other shall be discharged by Audita querela The King untill 33. H. 8. could not touch the Land or Heire of his debtor if he had goods sufficient by Magna Charta cap. 8. but other persons were left at large Advowson and other Lands were extended for this debt Debt upon an Obligation against one as Heire in the debet detinet adjudged good otherwise it is against Executors for Executors are debtors and have their assets in one anothers right scilicet in the right of the said Testator but the Heire hath the Land to him discended in his own right and so the property which he hath in the assets maketh the debt his proper debt And therefore if he dies his Executors shall be charged with the debt of his Father and not his Heire notwithstanding he hath the Land by discent for that he claimes it from his Father and not from his Grandfather which was debtor as it seemeth by the Booke of Entries fol. 171. title Debt Yet inquire by Plowdon And if the Heire cometh not in and confesse the action and the truth of the Asserts discended then he shall be charged as for his own debt by Capias ad satisfaciendum fieri facias or elegit So if he be condemned upon default nihil dicit false plea or demurrer as Greensmiths Case is 15. El. or upon nihil dicit as Killegrewes Case is 3. Eliz. or upon any other Plea or not pleading c. otherwise of Executors which are debtors but in anothers right there Execution shall be of the goods of the deceased onely and not of their proper goods and in debt against the Heire all the Land which he hath by discent shall be put in execution by the Common Law and in no other Case Wast by cleer Haddon against Brook IF a man purchase Lands and die without Issue and without Heire on the part of his Father P. 15. El. in the Common Pleas. the Heire of the the Mother of his Father shall inherit him and not the Heire on the part of his own Father Adjudged For the Heire on the part of the Grandmother on the part of his father which conveys by the Father which is a Male is more worthy of bloud then the Heire on the part of the mother of the Purchasor which conveyes immediately by a Female and not by a Male But if both agree in equall dignity of blood there the neerest Heire shall be preferred as the brother of the Grandmother of the part of the Mother of the Purchasor shall be preferred before the brother of the great Grandmother of the part of the Father for he is nearest and the dignitie of their blood as to the Purchasor is equall for Proximitie keepeth place on the part of the Females conjoyned by marriage to the Males from whence such blood is once derived by a Male to the Purchasor by the whole Court land purchased by the Father discends never resorting to the blood of the Mother of his Sonne because strangers to the blood of the Father 39. E. 3.29 No woman after the Wife of the Father purchasor shall have the Land when once discended because
their Husbands is contrary to the intent of the Statute and the intent ought to be thought on because the Purviewe extends not further then the intent of the makers of the Statute as the Wife infeoffs the Father of him with whom she intends to marry for to regive the Land to them after their intermarriage for lives or remainder in tayle to the Wife the Father doth so they have issue the Wife after the death of the Husband levies a Fine to other uses their issue may not enter yet it is with in the words of the Act of 11. H. 7. because the Father gave it to them But this cometh from the Wife her selfe by circumstance And the Father was but as an Instrument of it and therefore out of the intent of 11. H. 7. which restraineth the generalty of the letter of the Statute and maketh the Cases within the words out of the penalty of the Statute by the intent of the Makers As Infants and mad Men are excepted out of the Cases of Fellonies made by any Statute so neither those nor a Fem covert shall be concluded in the intent of the Statute which maketh them accessary which shall give them Meat Drink or other ayde to them which shall commit such an Act. So if a bargaine for Land be made before a Writ brought against him and the suite depending Livery and Seisen is made It is not Champarty 19. R. 2. because he ought to performe the bargaine made upon just consideration notwithstanding W. 2. Cap. 49. and Articul super Chart. Cap. 11. So a barr fee is within the letter but not the intent of the Statute of 32. H. 6. cap. 10. because appointed to the Sheriffe in the beginning by the order and discretion of the Court for his labour and attendance when the Prisoners are brought to their delivery 21. H. 7.16 So Wreck if a Man Dog or Car escapes alive shall be kept that the party may have his goods if he claimes within the yeare by W. 1. cap. 4. is intended of such things which will endure so long and not perish in the meane time as are Lemans Oringes c. So a rent granted by tenant in tayle for a release of right in other Lands is good 44. E. 3.21 because for the benefit of the estate tayle And W. 2. De donis c. intends not to restraine that which amends the estate tayle So Parsonages and Vicarages are within the words but out of the sense and intent of 1. E. 6. cap. 14. which inlargeth the words of the Statute and maketh that Cases within the like mischeife shall be within the Purview by equity as by the Book of entrys fol. 406. a man shall recover double damages for costs sustained with force by equity of 4. H. 4. cap. 8. which gives this for disseisen of the Land So that Executor which cometh first by distresse shall answer by equity of 9. E. 3. cap. 5. which speaketh of Executors by equity of Gloucester the Lessor shall have wast against the Lessee for half a yeare or for twenty weeks which pleads yeares So 1. E. 6. cap. 12. which takes away Clergy for stealing Horses takes it away also for one Horse because included in the Plurall Number and therefore Plowden disallows 2. E. 6. cap. 33. which taketh away Clergy for the stealing of one Horse as a superfluous Statute and was made in vaine And so 1. E. 6 cannot of Law but morall vertue which reforme the Law and the other equity is Quasi equality because in the like reason in the like Law Sobye against Molins TIthes shall be payd for the Boughs of Hornebeame H. 17. El. in the Kings Bench. Attachment upon prohibition Hasell Sallows Maple and such Trees which are not fit for building and so of the Trees themselves although that the Trees and Boughs are above the age of one and twenty yeares for they are not great Trees which are exempted and priviledged of Tithes by the Statute of 45. E. 3. cap. 3. or rather by the Common Law in affirmance of which this Statute was made as appeareth 50. E. 3.10 But Tithes shall not be payd for Ashes Oaks and Elmes Beech and such like Trees which are fit for building and of the age of twenty yeares nor for the Branches of them which are of the age of twenty yeares Quere if the Branches are within such age as the Timber trees which use to be lopped and lopt if Tithe shal be payd for them and it seemeth Tithes shall be payd of them by the Book The use at this day is upon suggestion to have a prohibition that the party shall be bound by Obligation or Recognisans to the King to preferr a Bill of attachment against the party which sues in the spirituall Court if he requires it and upon it to declare and joine issue or demurr upon the right of Tithes and award consultation which Plowden held vicious First for that the Defendant is not Actor and therefore may not have consultation upon such proceedings Secondly For that the Judgement upon the Attachment ought to be to acquit or attaint the party of the Contempt and not proceed upon the right of Tithes Thirdly For that the Plaintiffe cometh into the Court voluntarily Scilicet by his Recognisans to exhibit his Attachment where he ought to be brought in voluntarily by Process Fourthly Because the suggestion of the Attachment is false Fifthly For that if the Plaintiffe will not proceed the Defendant hath no remedy but a Recognisance forfeited to the King But Plowden held it to be the best course after the prohibition that the Defendant sues out a Scire facias against the Plaintiffe Quare consultatio concedi non debeat And upon this the Plaintiffe may declare and the matter shall be tryed and the Defendant may have consultation and then he will be an Actor Sanders and Archers Case ARcher gave Poison to Sanders to Poison his Wife H. 18. El. the Report of the opinions of Dyer Cheife Justice and Barham Justices of Assises in Warw. and Sanders gives this to his Wife in a roasted Apple which did eate part of it and gave the residue to their daughter being an Infant and after the Wife recovers and the Infant dyes and it was adjudged Murder in Sanders for which he was hanged but not in Archer for he was acquit to be no accessary to this Murder First For that Sanders had an evill intent of Murder at the beginning of his Act to kill his Wife and therefore the consequent of his Act by which the Daughter dyes shall be adjudged according to the commencement So if a man shoots at one and kills another or lyeth in waite to kill one and kills another otherwise it is where he hath no ill intent of killing any as to lay poyson to kill Rats and one eates of it and dyeth Secondly The consent of Archer to kill the Woman may not bee conjectured further then he gave it
first and after of the Land in sense and so by exposition the words shall be altered and so marshaled that the intent may take effect So a termor deviseth all his terme to his Son neverthelesse his Will is that his Wife shall have it for her life holden a good devise to both by conversion of the words So a Remainder to the Church of Saint Andrew in Holborne good by devise 21. R. 2. although the Devisee is not capable because the Testator intended that the Parson shall have it Cestuy que use at this day devise that his Feoffees shall be seised to the use of one A. in fee this is a good devise of the Land Adjudged in the Case of Lingen yet after 27. H. 8. he cannot have Feoffees to his use because the intent was that he should have the Land So the Executor shall not sell the Land according to the devise but take the profits for two years to his owne use the heire may enter because the intent of the Testator maketh this a Condition 38. Ass 31. Incertainty in Contracts reduceable to certainty by contingent standeth good As if I lease to one habendum from the death of J. untill such a Feast which shall be in the year 1620. good if J. dye before that otherwise it is void Two properties of a terme as where Lessee for yeares which grants over his terme enters for not payment of Rent and retaineth untill he be paid his Arrerages thereof So of a Conusee of a Statute which hath the Land extended so upon a Lease for yeares of a Mill except the Profits to the Lessor for his life and adjudged a good Exception And if the Lessor enters he hath a property incertain and the Lessee another 39. H. 6.37.8 So it is of Sheepe letten for to compester or a Chain of Gold pledged 5. H. 71. they have one Property and the owner another Cestuy que use devise the Profits and Issues of his Lands fol. 509. b Cestui que use before the Statute of 27. H. 8. Devise his Land and after the Statute publishes his Testament of new the Land passeth by the Statute of 32. H. 8. See fol. 514. yet he was once countermanded by the Statute Cestuy que use devises that his Feoffees shall stand seized to the use of himselfe for life with remainder over this is a good Declaration of the use during his life yet the Will cannot take effect untill his death Quere of this Case fol. 508. b. Bransbie against Grantham AN Executor having a Terme P. 20. El. in the Kings Bench E. firme as Executor devises the Terme to a stranger and maketh his Sonne Executor and dies the stranger enters into the Land by the Assent and Consent of the Executor And after the Executor enters And adjudged that his Entry was lawfull and the devise voide And by consequence the assent given to a voide thing shall be also void and shall not enure as a new grant but onely and assent to the thing devised 1. Because that the Executor cannot devise any thing which he hath as Executor 2. For that the Executor hath the Terme here to the use of the Testator and no man can make a devise of any thing except that he hath it to his owne use And therefore the Husband cannot devise the Terme of his Wife And then when the Executor dies his Executor hath it by Title before the devise as Executor of the first Testator and the property that the Devisor had as Executor is determined hy the determination of his Office of Executorship which is ended by his death and the last Executor hath it by Relation as immediate Executor of the first Testator So an Executor cannot devise the goods of his Testator and therefore the goods of the first Testator in the hands of the last Executor shall not be taken in execution for the debt of the last Testator because the last Executor hath them as immediate Executor to the first Testator and to his use as if they never had been in the last Testator by Relation Hare against Bickley A Prebendary after Admission and Institution and before Induction and Installation grants an Annuity for him and his Successors The Bishop confirmes it and after the Prebendary is Installed and on the same day of the Installation the Dean and Chapter conconfirmes also and after the Prebendary dieth and the Grantee bringeth a Writ of Annuity against the Successor of the Prebend and Adjudged that it lyeth not because the Grant before Induction was voide Induction giveth to the Probendary the possession Temporall and Freehold and the Confirmation is nothing without the Possession And therefore without Induction a man shall not have a Writ of Right nor Spoliation Trespasse nor Assise otherwise it is of a Quare Impedit For in the first he alledges Esplees but not in the last 26. H. 8.3 But by the Admission and Institution he hath care of Soules and is inabled to administer the Sacraments c. And the Arch-Deacon shall make Induction to the Parson and Vicar but shall not make Installation to a Prebendary but the Deane and Chapter shall doe it No Plenarty against the King before Induction for that it is corporall seisen and possession 38. E. 3.10 So the King confirmes to the Collatee of a Bishop before he is inducted the Confirmation is voide 11. H. 4.7.1 H. 5.1 He which hath the Nomination is Patron and he that presents is his servant Induction is triable by the Countrey So if Parson or not and it shall be tried where the Church is 21. E. 4.7 and 33. A woman recovers in Dower she cannot enter but ought to have seisen delivered to her by the Sheriffe as a Copyholder ought to be admitted by the Lord of the Mannor if it discends to him before he shall have seisen in judgement of Law So a Prebendary Parson or Vicar before he is Inducted or Installed hath not seisen nor is full Incumbent for to charge the Possessions of the Prebond Parsonage or Vicaridge Crosse against Howell THe Cookes of London were interrupted in 22. E. 4. Tr. 20. El. in the Kings Bench E. firme by the name of two Masters and Governors of the Communalty of the Mystery of the Cookes of London and in the 21. H. 8. they bargain and sell certain Land by the name of A B C and D. Master and Wardens of the Craft or Mystery of the Cookes of London to R. D. for money without naming his Heires and the Barganee enters and levies a Fine with Proclamations and five yeares passe And adjudged that the Corporation shall be bound by the Fine and Nonclaime and therefore the entry and delivery of the Deede of their Lease to the Plaintiffe as their Deed by him which had their Letter of Attorney so to doe is meerly void 1. The bargain and sale was made for the variance of the Indenture from their name of Corporation for they were
incorporate Masters and the Indenture is Master And in the Indenture foure are named and their Charter Warrants but two Masters Also the Charter is Masters or Governors and the Indenture Masters and Guardians So it varies in Guardians for Governors and in et for or and the words Craft and mystery are surplusage and therefore void words and do not prejudice the Deed but for the other variance the Deed was adjudged void And therefore the bargainee by his entry is a disseisor 2. The Fine with Proclamations and five yeares barres this Corporation and all other Corporations as Major and Communalty Deane and Chapter Colledges c. Which have absolute Estates in their owne right and their Successors for ever by equity of the Statute of 4. H. 7. Notwithstanding that the Statute speakes onely of Men and their Heires for that this Statute is taken largely for possessions of Lands by the Fine and strictly against the ancient right if they be remisse in their claime for five yeares and the Act ought to remedy all the mischief otherwise it is of Corporations which have not any absolute Estate without others as Bishop Deane Parson Vicar and Prebendary c. But every one of them shall be barred by Nonclaim by five years and every Successor shall have new five years So every Officer who hath Land appertaining to his Office as a Parker Forrester Keeper of a Gaole c. shall be barred of Nonclaime after a Fine levied by his disseisor and five year past after Proclamations his Successor not if he doe not also permit 5. yeares Passe in his time 3. A Corporation cannot be seised to another use but onely a Naturall body because they are not imprisonable to be compelled to perform the confidence and a body Naturall shall not be imprisoned for the offence of their body Corporate which is another body 4. A bargain and sale without words Heires shall give a Fee simple But upon those two Points the Court was not resolved because that the other two made an end of the Case An authority given by a Corporation to enter into Land and claime it to their use and after to make a Lease of it in their name is good fol. 535. b. Paramor against Yardley A Termer devises all his Terme to his Sonne H. 21. El. in the Kingâ— Bench. Trespasse and besides saith that his will and intent was that his Wife should have the Occupation and Profits of the Land during the Minority of his Sonne to the intent that she with the Profits of it shall educate his children and see his Will performed and made his Wife his Executrix and dies the Wife proves the Testament and educates his Infants accordingly after sells the Terme to one to whom the Testator was indebted having then sufficient of the Goods and Chattells of the Testator to pay all his debts besides the said Lease and after she dies the Sonne at his full age enters and his Entry was adjudged lawfull and his grant to the Plaintiffe good 1. Because that the devise to the Wife is good during the Minority of the Sonne and by the exposition of the Court shall be intended to precede the devise to the Sonne in sense and intent and the devise to the Sonne to succeed 540 5â—…1 a. 2. For that the devise of the Profits and Occupation of the Land is a devise of the Land it self for that is the benefit and fruit of the Land otherwise it is of the use of a Chattell personall as of a Looking-glasse Mappe Globe or Booke for there the use is a distinct thing from the property fol. 541. b. and 541. a. 3. For that the Terme shall be executed in the Wife as a Legacy certain untill she disagrees to it because it is more for her benefit and she may not have an occasion against her self as another may otherwise it is of a Legacy certain 1. The Common Law to make the intent of the Parties take effect puts order to words contained in deeds without order as the Releafe of the Disseisor and Disseisee to the Lessâ—e for yeares of the Disseisor shall be first or the Disseisor and after the Disseisee otherwise it wonteth previty between him and the Lessee So Tenant for life Houses for yeares and he and him in Reversion consâ—…mes the Estate of Lessee for yeares habendum in Fee The Law adjudgeth the Estate of the Tenant first to passe for to make previtie upon which Release that of him in the Reversion may enure to enlarge the Estate So a Termor for thirty yeares and his Lessee in Possession for ten yeares by himselfe may not surrender for want of previty And therefore his surrender shall be taken to succeed the other Land is devised to one in Fee after a Rent out of it to another in Fee good So fol. 523. because it shall be taken first devised although it be subsequent in words As the Will repeales the first so the last part of the Will repeales to the first part of the Will which is contrary to it because he had such Intent last As a devise of Land to one in Fee in the premises and in the end of the Will to another in Fee But here is not any such contrariety 2. By grant of the Lease land passeth during the Terme because the Lease contains the Land it selfe and time in it words equivalent to words usuall shall have the sense and force of words usuall as 5. H. 7.1 Licence to enter and occupy Land for one moneth is a Lease and so shall be pleaded So that Land shall return redibit or discend or to a stranger after the death of Tenant for life shall be pleaded as a Remainder So a grant of the nomination of the Advowson is in substence a grant of the Advowson because the profit of it rests in the Nomination So here words of Nomination and Profits of the Lease is as much as the Lease it selfe for the time and not of distinct Profits to take also because the Executor here hath not remedy at the Common Law for the Profits if she be ousted of it and for this Legacy she hath no remedy in the Spirituall Court because she cannot sue her selfe there also the Estate it selfe of the Terme shall be in the Wife because the Sonne shall not have it untill fuâ—l age and then might drown his Profit if she hath but profit to loose 3. Alteration made by Operation of Law where the Party hath not any against whom to bring in his action which is equivalent to a Suite and Execution given to a Stranger as of a Remitter So a Debtor of twenty pound is made Executor he may pay himselfe by way of Retainer and hath property in the debt it selfe presently because he cannot sue himselfe and the Law giveth to him the like advantage as a Suite should be which performes the charge of the thing thereby he claimes the commodity annexed to the charge as to keep