the Church saving to every one their proper debts And thus since the Conquest the Church-men encroached by degrees unto a great power in matters Testamentary I say by degrees for as yet by this Law it appeareth that they were but Overseers or Eye-witnesses for as yet right of ordering or disposing they had none as may appear in that case of a Bastard dying without Issue and intestate the Lord shall have his personal Estate And in all cases the Executor had then nothing but bare Assets and the overplus was assigned between the Wife and Children according to their reasonable part Or if the party died intestate the next friends did administer paying the Debts and making Dividend of the overplus into the reasonable parts according to the ancient Saxon custom still continued Nor doth the testimony cited out of Bracton prove any other than that the Ancestor hath free power to order his Estate as he pleaseth and that the Children shall have no more than is left unto them by their Ancestor either in his Will or in case of dying intestate by the custom or Law which is and ever was the rationabilis pars No purveyance for any Castle out of the same Town where the Castle is but present satisfaction must be made and if in the same Town satisfaction must be made within forty days Purveyance was ancient provision for the necessities of the publick and so far was commendable seeing it is not the common case of all men to regard the publick above their own private interest therefore the publick must provide for it self by their means in whom the publick is most concerned And this was in those elder times but in two cases viz. of Kings and Castles in the one of which the Government is principally concerned in the other the publick defence For it may be well conjectured that Castles were either first made in places commodious for habitation and great Towns gathered to them for their better safety or that the Towns were first gathered in places of commodious habitation and then Castles were made for their better defence Or if they were imposed upon them by the Victor to keep them in awe they were nevertheless by continuance together become tractable and conspired for the mutual defence of each other But as touching such Cittadels or Castles that were set in solitary places they may seem rather first intended for the particular defence of some particular Man and his Family and neighbouring Tenants and therefore in the purveyance for Castles it seems the proper Town wherein it is principally liable to that duty because their safety is more principally interested and therefore Prizes there taken may be paid at a day to come but in all other places immediately Nevertheless this lasted not long for the Souldiers found out a trick of favouring their own Quarters and preserving them in heart against a back Winter knowing that at such times it is better to seek for provision nigh than to be compelled to seek far off But this Stratagem was cut off by the next King who inhibited all manner of purveyance in any other Town than in the same Town wherein the Castle is seated This was a charge that was but Temporary and occasional That which was more lasting and burthensome upon the Subjects was purveyance for the King which nevertheless cannot be avoided by reason of the greatness of his Retinue especially in those days and if they should have their resort to the Market the same could not be free to the people for that the first service must be for the Kings Houshold and so what scraps will be left for the Commons no man can tell It was therefore necessary for the Kings Family to be maintained by purveyance and to avoid the many inconveniencies which might and did arise in those spoiling times It was ordained 1. That it should be Felony for any Purveyor to purvey without Warrant 2. That none but the Kings Purveyor must purvey for the Kings house and that he must purvey onely for the Kings house and to purvey no more than is necessary and to pay for the things they take And because Kings were oftentimes necessitated for removal from place to place purveyance of carriage was also allowed And in case the Subjects were grieved either by more purveyance than was necessary or by non-payment for the Commodities so taken or with composition for the Kings debts for such purveyance the Offenders were liable to fine and imprisonment Or if they were grieved by Purveyors without Warrant the Offender was to be proceeded against as in case of Felony He that serveth in Castle-guard is not liable to payment of Rent for that service nor is be compellable to either so long as be is in the service in the Army By the ancient custom none but a Knight might be charged with the guard of a Castle belonging to the King for the letter of this Law mentioneth onely such and therefore to hold by Castle-guard is a Tenure in Knight-service And it seemeth that Rent for Castle-guard originally was consistent with Knight-service and that it was not annual but promiscuously Knights might either perform the service or pay Rent in lieu thereof and upon occasion did neither if the King sent them into the field And lastly that a Knight might either do the service in his own person or by his Esquire or another appointed by him thereto No Knights nor Lords nor Church-mens Carriages nor no mans Wood shall be taken against the Owners consent nor shall any mans Carriages be taken if he will pay the Hire limited by the Law. Church-men were exempted from charge to the Kings Carriages meerly in favour to the Canon which exempted the Goods of the Clergy from such Lay-service nevertheless the complaints of the Clergie formerly mentioned shew that this was not duly observed Knights and Lords were discharged not onely for the maintenance of their Port but more principally because they were publick servants for the defence of the Kingdom in time of War and the Kingdom was then equally served by themselves and their equipage and their carriages as a necessary assistant thereunto The King shall have no more profit of Felons Lands than the year and a day and the Lord is to have the remainder Anciently the Lords had all the Estate of Felons being their Tenants and the King had onely a Prerogative to waste them as a penalty or part thereof but afterwards the Lords by agreement yielded unto the King the year and a days profit to save the Lands from spoil and in continuance of time the King had both the year and day and waste Fugitives also were in the same case viz. such as deserted their Country either in time of need or such as fled from the Tryal of Law in criminal cases for in both cases the Saxons accounted them as common Felons Nevertheless the two customs of Gloucester
Circuit had six Justices which the King made Justices of the Common pleas throughout the Kingdom Neither yet did the first Commission continue so long as four years for within that time Richard Lucy one of the Justices had renounced his Office and betaken himself to a Cloister and yet was neither named in the first Commission nor in the latter nor did the last Commission continue five years for within that time Ralph Glanvil removed from the Northern Circuit to that of Worcester as by the story of Sir Gilbert Plumpton may appear though little to the honour of the justice of the Kingdom or of that Judge however his book commended him to posterity I take it upon the credit of the reporter that this itinerary judicature was setled to hold every Seven years but I find no monument thereof before these days As touching their power certainly it was in point of judicature as large as that of the Court of Lords though not so high It was as large because they had cognizance of all Causes both concerning the Crown and Common-pleas And amongst those of the Crown this onely I shall note that all manner of falshood was inquirable by those Judges which after came to be much invaded by the Clergie I shall say no more of this but that in their original these Iters were little other than visitations of the Country by the grand Council of Lords Nor shall I adde any thing concerning the Vicontiel Courts and other inferiour but what I find in Glanvil that though Robbery belonged to the King's Court yet Thefts belonged to the Sheriff's Court and if the Lords Court intercepts not all batteries and woundings unless in the complaint they be charged to be done contra pacem Domini Regis the like also of inferiour Trespasses besides Common-pleas whereof more shall follow in the next Chapter as occasion shall be CHAP. LXII Of certain Laws of Judicature in the time of Henry the second ANd hereof I shall note onely a few as well touching matter of the Crown as of property being desirous to observe the changes of Law with the times and the manner of the growth thereof to that pitch which in these times it hath attained We cannot find in any story that the Saxon Church was infested with any Heresie from their first entrance till this present Generation The first and last Heresie that ever troubled this Island was imbred by Pelagius but that was amongst the Britains and was first battered by the Council or Synod under Germanus but afterwards suppressed by the Zeal of the Saxons who liked nothing of the British breed and for whose sake it suffered more haply than for the foulness of the opinion The Saxon Church leavened from Rome for the space of above five hundred years held on its course without any intermission by cross Doctrine springing up till the time of Henry the second Then entred a Sect whom they called Publicans but were the Albigences as may appear by the decree of Pope Alexander whose opinions I shall not trouble my course with but it seems they were such as crossed their way and Henry the second made the first president of punishing Heresie in the Kingdom under the name of this Sect whom he caused to be brought before a Council of Bishops who endeavoured to convince them of their errour but failing therein they pronounced them Hereticks and delivered them over to the Lay power by which means they were branded in the fore-head whipped and exposed to extremity of the cold according to the decree of the Church died This was the manner and punishment of Hereticks in this Kingdom in those days albeit in seemeth they were then decreed to be burnt in other Countries if that Relation of Cog shall be true which Picardus noteth upon the 13th Chapter of the History of William of Newberry out of which I have inserted this Relation Another Case we meet with in Henry the second 's time concerning Apostacy which was a Crime that as it seems died as soon as it was born for besides that one we find no second thereto in all the file of English story The particular was that a Clerk had renounced his Baptism and turned Jew and for this was convicted by a Council of Bishops at Oxford and was burned So as we have Apostacy punished with death and Heresie with a punishment that proved mortal and the manner of conviction of both by a Council of the Clergie and delivered over to the Lay-power who certainly proceeded according to the direction of the Canon or advice of the Council These if no more were sufficient to demonstrate the growing power of the Clergie however brave the King was against all his Enemies in the field Treason was anciently used onely as a Crime of breach of Trust or Fealty as hath been already noted now it grows into a sadder temper and is made all one with that of laesa Majestas and that Majesty that now-a-days is wrapped up wholly in the person of the King was in Henry the second 's time imparted to the King and Kingdom as in the first times it was more related to the Kingdom And therefore Glanvil in his book of Laws speaking of the Wound of Majesty exemplifies Sedition and destruction of the Kingdom to be in equal degree a Wound of Majesty with the destruction of the person of the King and then he nameth Sedition in the Army and fraudulent conversion of Treasure-trove which properly belongs to the King. All which he saith are punished with Death and forfeiture of Estate and corruption of Bloud for so I take the meaning of the words in relation to what ensueth Felonies of Manslaughter Burning Robbery Ravishment and Fausonry are to be punished with loss of Member and Estate This was the Law derived from the Normans and accordingly was the direction in the Charge given to the Justices itinerant in Henry the second 's time as appeareth in Hoveden But Treason or Treachery against the Oath Fealty or Bond of Allegiance as of the Servants against the Lord was punished with certain and with painful deaths And therefore though the murther of the King was Treason yet the murther of his Son was no other than as of another man unless it arose from those of his own Servants The penalty of loss of Estate was common both to Treason and Felony it reached even unto Thefts in which case the forfeiture as to the Moveables was to the Sheriff of the County unto whose cognizance the case did belong and the Land went to the Lord immediately and not to the King. But in all cases of Felony and of a higher nature the party though not the King's Tenant lost his personal Estate to the King for ever his Free-holds also for a year and a day after which they returned to the Lord of the Soil by way of Escheat
irregularity of her proceedings Before ever she called Parliament she setled the great work of Reformation or rather Deformation in the Worship of God by single Proclamation and not onely took away the Partition-wall of Doctrine by the like power but gave way and power to Persecution thereupon to arise before any 〈◊〉 Order from the Holy See then so called enabled her thereun◠〈◊〉 And â—â—ter that she declared her self convinced that she ought not 〈◊〉 Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and by her Instructions forbad the 〈…〉 in their Process that Clause of Regia Autoritate fulcitus yet even these Instructions had no other Authority than her own And nevertheless she still inforced the Execution of all matters concerning the publick Worship of God and Government of the Church when as yet the Pope had no admittance unto his ancient claim It is very true that the Pope long ere now had made a fair offer and the Queen had lent her ear but her Train was too great to move as fast as was pretended so as no meeting could be had till the Queens Marriage with Spain was past and such as were disaffected found it was bootless to stop the Current of two such mighty Streams of Power now joyned into one and so that unclean spirit returned seven times worse than when he went out and took Seisin meerly upon Repeal of the Laws made by Henry the Eighth in the Negative without farther Grant or Livery For though an express Embassage was sent to Rome to perform the solemnity of the submission yet the Pope died before the arrival of the Embassie and the solemnity failing left the Title of the Crown much blemished yet was it not wholly defaced For if the Statutes in Henry the Eighth and Edward the Sixth's time did but confirm the possession it is evident that the repealing of those Statutes took away no Right from the Crown nor gave legal possession to the Pope that had formerly neither Possession nor Right but left him to his Remitter as in his ancient right or rather in his ancient wrong Yet right or wrong de facto he both did win and wear the Keys so long as the Queen lived and so far as she pleased for her devotion would not allow of absolute obedience in that kind nor all for Gospel that the Pope said or did but by her self and Council executed the powers of Supremacy of Jurisdiction in Church-matters not onely in pursuance of the Papal Authority but in crossing the same where the Popes way crossed her opinion as in the cases of the War between her Husband and France and the Power Legatine of Cardinal Pool her condemning of Doctrines and Books to be Heretical by Proclamation establishing both Prayers and Dirges and other Orders of publick Worship whereof more fully in the publick Histories of those times and the Queens Injunctions upon occasion of the death of Pope Julio is to be seen Lastly she was no good Queen not onely because she gave up the peoples Liberties in Ecclesiastical matters to the Foreign Jurisdiction of Rome but undertook too much therein by far upon her own account and in Civil affairs though de jure she was not inferiour to any of her Progenitors yet she would have it declared by the Parliament as if the consideration of her Sex or Birth had made some hesitation in her mind and when she had made all clear she commending her self thereby to the Prince of Spain with her self indangered likewise that trust of the Nation which she had received and cast such a shadow upon her own Supremacy as in many things it is hard to be discerned Lastly in her whole course uneven sometimes appearing like the eldest Daughter of Henry the Eighth at other times like a Fee-covert led by the will of her Lord aud Husband that wanting Supremacy himself rendred her thereby beneath her self For first she married by Act of Parliament as if she were not at her own disposing professing as much in her speech to the Londoners upon the Kentish Rebellion So a difference was made between the two Sisters the Marriage of the one being by advice of Parliament and the abstinence of the other against the same Nor is the same altogether irrational for by the one the Government of the Nation is endangered and by the other otherwise Secondly by her Marriage she became doubly married one way relating to her Person unto her King the other relating to her Trust unto her Council For where a Foreign mighty King is so nigh the Helm it is dangerous to trust the same to his Wife without the joynt concurrence of the Lords The matter in fact declared no less for many times she had steered quite wide had not the Lords been more stiff to their Principles than she The first year of her Marriage was Honey-moon with her she thought nothing too dear for the King and that her self was but meanly married unless her Husband were as compleat a King in her Nation as any of her Predecessors although contrarily the higher he was advanced the meaner she became Thirdly by her Marriage she adventured her Title of Supremacy of Jurisdiction For Philip as King had the Honour Stile and Kingly name and so had the precedency He had to do also with the Jurisdiction for by the Articles of the Marriage he was to aid the Queen in her Administration of the Kingdom and maintenance of the Laws Writs and Commissions passed under his name He also sate in Parliament voted therein and joyned in the Royal Assent Lastly joyned in the publication and execution of all Laws To him also was Allegiance due and therefore the Crime of Treason was equally against his as the Queens Crown and Dignity saving that it was reserved to be as against him onely during the time of Coverture And yet had the Queen left Issue by him it would have been a hard adventure for the Lawyers to have given their Opinion in that case seeing the King had been Guardian to his Children during their Minority Lastly the whole power and jurisdiction resting in them both joyntly could not enable them to make or dissolve Courts at will nor conclude Orders and Directions in cases of Plea and Conveyance nor Process concerning the same I shall sum up all in this one conclusion If neither of these three had an absolute Legislative Power either in matters concerning the Church or Commonwealth if no absolute Jurisdiction in case either of Life Member or Estate If they neither can create unite or alter any Court either concerning the Trial and determining the Estates of the People or their own Revenue If not alter or make any new Process in the Courts of Law If not order common Assurances of Lands or Estates And lastly if they have no power in determining the last Appeal and definitive Sentence in matters of Controversie but all must rest upon the Sentence by Parliament there must certainly be found out a further
the gift of the King for the Law of St. Edward which provideth for the recovery of the Arrears of this Money and enjoyneth that they must be paid to the King and not to Rome as it was in the days of Canutus and Edgar rendereth the reason thereof to be because it was the Kings Alms. Secondly that it was an Alms onely from the King and out of his own Demesnes may seem not improbable because it was ex regali munificentia which could never be affirmed if the gift had been out of the Estates of others Secondly it was granted onely out of such houses as yielded Thirty pence Rent called vivae pecuniae because in those times Rent was paid in Victual so as it may seem that onely Farms were charged herewith and not all mens Farms neither for the general income will never answer that proportion The particular hereof I shall in brief set forth It appeareth in the former Quotation that Offa charged this Leavy upon the Inhabitants dwelling in Nine several Diocesses viz. Hereford which contained the City and County adjacent 2. Worcester containing the Cities and Shires of it and Gloucester 3. Litchfield containing Warwickshire Cheshire Staffordshire Shropshire and Derbyshire 4. Leicester with the County adjacent 5. Lincoln with the County adjacent 6. Dorchester whereto belonged Northamptonshire Buckinghamshire Bedfordshire Huntingtonshire Cambridgeshire and half Hertfordshire 7. London with Essex Middlesex and the other half of Hertfordshire 8. Helmham with Norfolk 9. Domuck or Dunwich with Suffolk In which nine Diocesses were two and Twenty Shires And he further granted it out of Spatinghenshire now Nottingham whose Church belonged to York But in Ethelwolfs time the Grant was enlarged and extended into Fifteen Diocesses which together with their several charge out of the English Martyrology I shall particularize as followeth  l. s. d. Cantuar. Dioces 07 18 0 London 16 10 0 Roffen 05 12 0 Norwic 21 10 0 Elienum 05 00 0 Lincoln 42 00 0 Cistrens 08 00 0 Winton 17 06 8 Exon 09 05 0 Wigorn 10 05 0 Hereford 06 00 0 Bathon 12 05 0 Latisburgh 17 00 0 Coventry 10 05 0 Ebor 11 10 0  200 06 8 The whole Sum whereof not exceeding Two hundred pounds Six shillings and Eight pence will not amount to Seven hundred pounds of now-currant Money if the weight of a Penny was not less in those times than in the Reign of Edward the First when it was the Twentieth part of an Ounce and that the Twelfth part of a Pound as by the Statute thereof made may appear Nor can the difference be much if any in regard of the vicinity of the time of this extract to that of the Statute for though no particular date thereof appear yet it seemeth to be done after the Translation of the See from Thetford to Norwich which was done in William Rufus his time and after the erecting of the Bishoprick of Ely which was in the time of Henry the First Now albeit this charge was in future times diversly ordered and changed yet upon this account it will appear that not above Eight and forty thousand and Eighty Houses were charged in this time of Edward the Second with this Assessment which is a very small proportion to the number of Houses of Husbandry in these days and much more inferiour to the proportion of Houses in those times if Polydores observation be true that in the Conquerour's time there were Sixty thousand Knights Fees and as others Fifty thousand Parishes It may therefore be rather thought that none but the Kings Farmers were charged herewith notwithstanding the positive Relations of Writers who in this case as in most others wherein the credit of Rome is engaged spare not to believe lightly and to write largely And thus for their Sevenfold Church-Officers we have also as many kinds of constant maintenance One in Lands and Tenements and Six several kinds out of the Profits and the personal Estate besides the emergent benefits of Oblations and others formerly mentioned CHAP. XII Of the several Precincts of Jurisdictions of Church-Governours amongst the Saxons THe Church-Officers thus called to the Drum and paid are sent to their several charges over Provinces Diocesses Deaneries and Parishes as they could be setled by time and occasion Before the Saxons arrival London had the Metropolitan Sea or was the chiefest in precedency for Arch-bishops the Britons had none Afterwards by advice of the Wise-men Canterbury obtained the precedency for the honour of Austin who was there buried The number of Provinces and their several Metropolitan Sees was first ordered by advice of Pope Gregory who appointed two Arch-Bishops in Saxony the one to reside at Canterbury the other at York and that each of them should have Twelve Bishops under them But this could never be compleated till Austin was dead as by the Epistle of Kenulphus to Pope Leo appeareth Nor then had the Pope the whole power herein intailed to his Tripple Crown for the same Epistle witnesseth that the Council of the wise-men of the Kingdom ruled the case of the Primacy of Canterbury And Offa the King afterward divided the Province of Canterbury into two Provinces which formerly was but one The Precincts of Diocesses have been altered ordinarily by Kings or the Arch-bishops and their Synods as the lives of those first Arch-bishops set forth Theodore had divided his Province into Five Diocesses and within a hundred years after Offa we find it increased into eleven Diocesses Diocesses have also been subdivided into inferiour Precincts called Deanaries or Decanaries the chief of which was wont to be a Presbyter of the highest note called Decanus or Arch-Presbyter The name was taken from that Precinct of the Lay-power called Decennaries having Ten Presbyters under his visit even as the Decenners under their chief The smallest Precinct was that of the Parish the oversight whereof was the Presbyters work They had Abbeys and other religious Houses but these were however Regular among themselves yet Irregular in regard of Church-government whereof I treat CHAP. XIII Of the manner of the Prelates Government of the Saxon-Church HAving discoursed of the Persons and Precincts it now befals to touch upon the manner of the Government of the Church by the Saxon-Prelates which was not wrapped up in the narrow closet of private opinion but stated and regulated by publick Council as well in the making as executing of Laws already made This course was learned from antiquity and inforced upon them by a Roman-constitution in the case that concerned Arch-bishop Theodore and Wilfrid upon this ground Quod enim multorum concilio geritur nulli consentientium ingerat scandalum These are most ordinarily called Synods although at the pleasure of the Relator called also Councils and are either Diocesan or Provincial or National and these either particular or general The general consisted of all the Bishops and Clergy and such
accused of Homicide he shall be acquitted by Twelve Lords but if of inferiour rank he shall be acquitted by Eleven of his Equals and one Lord. Thus Gods providence disposed of the pride of men to be an instrument of its own restraint For the great men ere they were aware hereby lost one of the fairest Flowers of their Garland viz. the Judicature or rather the mastership of the Life or Death of the meaner sort and thereby a fair opportunity of containing them for ever under their awe And no less remarkable was the benefit that redounded to this Nation hereby for had the great men holden this power as once they had it it might soon have endangered the liberty of the Freemen and thereby been destructive to the Fundamental Constitution of the Government of this Realm which consisteth in the just and equal participation of these Priviledges wherein all are equally concerned This was the trial wherein the people of this Nation were made happy above all other people and whereby the Freemen as they had the Legislative power so likewise had the Juridical and thereby next under God an absolute dominion over themselves and their Estates For though this course of trial was first applied to matters of Crime yet it soon also seized upon the Common-pleas which for the most part was the work of main import in the Hundred Court and suitable hereunto are the prescriptions which are extant in the Law-books of Cognizance of Pleas and Writs of Assize c. from the times of the Saxons as in that case of the Abbot of Bury amongst others doth appear CHAP. XXXIX Of passing of Judgement and Execution AFter Verdict Judgement passed according to the letter of the Law or known Custom in criminal matters according to the greatness of the offence either for death or loss of Member But if the circumstances favoured the Delinquent he was admitted to redemption of Life or Member by Fine also setled by letter of the Law and not left to the Judges discretion If the Crime reached onely to shameful penance such as Pillory or Whipping the last whereof was inflicted onely upon Bondmen then might that Penance be reduced to a Ransom according to the grain of the offence assessed in the presence of the Judge by the Freemen and entred upon the Roll and the Estreat of each Ransom severally and apart sent to the Sheriff This Ransom was paid usually unto the King and Lord and the party indamaged or his friends if the case so required according to the old German rule Pars mulctae Regi vel civitati pars ipsi qui vindicatur vel propinquis ejus This course opened indeed a way for Mercy but through corruption a Floud-gate to Wickedness in the conclusion Of Imprisonment there was little use in the eldest times afterwards it was more used not onely to secure the person to come to trial of Law for miscarriages past but sometimes to secure men against committing of future mischief especially if it more concerned the publick I find but little or no use thereof barely as a punishment nor would their Ancestors so punish their Bondmen Vinculis coercere rarum est In case of Debt or Damage the recovery thereof was in nature of elegit for the party wronged either had the offenders goods to him delivered or the value in money upon sale of the goods made by the Sheriff and if that satisfied not then the moity of the Lands was extended and so by moities so far as was possible salvo contenemento and when all was gone the Defendants Arms which were accounted as the Nether-milstone or stock of maintenance were last of all seized and then the party was accounted undone and cast upon the charity of his friends for his sustenance but the person of the man was never imprisoned as a pledge for the debt no not in the Kings case Alfred imprisoned one of his Judges for imprisoning a man in that case One punishment of death they had in cases of crime and that was by hanging or strangling and where the crime was not so great sometimes ensued loss of member or mutilation and in many such cases Excommunication pronounced indeed by the Clergy but determined by the Law which in the first conception was framed in the womb of the Legislative power in Parliament as may appear in many Laws there made nor was there in those times any question made of the cognizance thereof so long as the Clergy and Laity had charity enough to joyn in all publick Councils CHAP. XL. Of the Penal Laws amongst the Saxons PAssing the Courts and manner of proceedings till Sentence we are now come to the particular Laws that directed the Sentence and first of those that concerned criminal offences During the Saxons time the Commonwealth was in its minority the Government tender the Laws green and subject to bend according to the blast of time and occasion and according to the different dispositions of Governours Ages and People For though the Saxons were in name our first matter yet not they onely but they having once made the breach open and entred this Island it became a common receptacle of those Eastern people the Angles Danes Almains and Goths as their several Laws left with us in power do not obscurely inform us and amongst all the rest the Goths were not the least concerned herein for the Saxon King determining what people shall be holden Denizons in this Kingdom saith That the Goths ought to be received and protected in this Kingdom as sworn Brethren Kinsmen and proper Citizens of this Commonwealth Nor can any Nation upon earth shew so much of the ancient Gothique Law as this Island hath Nevertheless in this mixture of people of several Nations there being a suitable mixture of Laws as the power of any one of these people 's changed so likewise did their Laws change in power and long it was ere a right temper of one uniform Law could be setled yet in the interim these short remembrances left unconsumed by time I have subjoyned that it may appear their motions were excellent though somewhat inconstant in their practice Those times were dark and yet so far as any light appeared the people were to be honoured for their resolution in the defence thereof For there was few of the Commandments of the two Tables which they did not assert by Laws by them made the third and tenth excepted which latter commands the inward man onely and whereof God hath the sole cognizance True it is that the first Commandment containeth much of the same nature yet somewhat is visible and that they bound For whereas in those times the Devil had such power as he did prevail with some and those it may be not a few to renounce God and deliver themselves wholly to his own will they punished this crime with banishment as judging him unworthy their society that would communicate
Hundred was amerced for the escape but if the party slain were known to be of English Parents it was otherwise This custom lasted long after the Normans time the Dane being only changed into the Norman and was called Englishire Batteries Maimes Imprisonments and other breaches of peace were punished by Fine which they called Fightwitt Grithbrece or Frithbreck and the Delinquent ordinarily put in sureties for the peace for future time The fine was increased by the number of Delinquents joyning in the fact for if seven joyned it was a Riot and the fine was then called Flothbote If the number were five times so many viz. thirty and five then it was a Rebellion or War. Secondly the fine was increased by the time or season of the fact as in Lent or while the Army was in the field because in the first case the holy time was prophaned in the second the Countrey was more endangered when the strength was abroad and the Army might be discouraged at the news of the disturbance at home And therefore the Saxons punished this with death or fine suitable Thirdly the fine was the greater in case of the excellency of the place where it was holy ground or in the presence of great persons such as the King or Bishop Adultery among the old Germans was holden a crime of a high nature the penalty of the woman that committed that crime was death I find not what became of the man. In latter times of the Saxons it grew less penal and more common By Alfreds Law it was finable and the fine called Legierwit By Canutus the man was fined or banished the woman to lose her nose ears and her portion Incest was more penal to the man than Adultery and yet it touched not his life Robbery amongst the Lacedemonians was accounted but a trick of youth the Athenians thoughts were more severe The Germans likewise differed in their censures concerning it the Saxons punished it with death but the Angles with fine only yet Ina the King made it mortal and Canutus followed him therein and Edward the Confessor limited that punishment to thefts of twelve pence in value or above Burning of woods was finable by Ina's Law but Burglary was Felony In King Edmunds time only the Danes made it finable possibly being guilty in their own Consciences of their own propensity to rapine and plunderings This priviledge of the dwelling-house was anciently called Hamsoca or Hamsoken or Hamsokne Trespasses committed upon ground were all comprehended under the general name of Ederbrece or hedge-breaking and the penalty was not only the damage to the party but also fine to the King upon Action which in these days passeth under the name of Quare clausum fregit according to the words of the Writ The damages were more or less according to the time or season when it was done for it when the Army was abroad the damages were doubled and in like manner if done in Lent time If the trespass was done by a Beast the owner must pay the damages but if it were occasioned through the complainants default as through his gap no damages were paid The constant fine to the King in all such trespasses was by Alfreds Law set at five shillings Other Actions also were then used as touching damage done to Goods and Actions upon the case for in Alfreds time the Plaintiff recovered not only damages for trespasses done to Possessions and Goods but also costs for injuries in point of scandal and defamation in case the complainant specially declareth that he is thereby disabled or indamaged in his preferment and maketh proof of the same suitable unto the forms of our pleadings at this day which conclude with per quod c. or deterioratus est c. The Saxons were utter enemies to Perjury they punished it with eternal discredit of testimony and sometimes with banishment or with grievous fines to the King and mulcts to the Judge For that difference I find observed in those days between fines and mulcts albeit the more ancient times used them for one and the same for so the Historian pars mulctae Regi In all these matters where any interest was vested in the Crown the King had the prerogative of pardon yet always the recompence to the party was saved besides the security of the good behaviour for time to come as the case required CHAP. XLI Of the Laws of Property of Lands and Goods and their manner of Conveyance THus passing over some tops of Saxon penal-Laws besides the general rule or Law of eye for eye tooth for tooth c. it now remains as lightly to glance at a few generals concerning the setling and property of possessions in point of Title concerning which although it be true that the Conquerors of this part of the Isle were a body aggregate of many Nations or peoples and so divers customs must necessarily settle by common intendment in several places according as they chose their habitation yet the general custom of the Germans as touching descent of inheritance was to the eldest Son. For Tacitus speaking of the German Cavalry saith That the Horse of the party dead went not to the eldest Son ut caetera but to the most valiant man amongst them of that Linage which words ut caetera do plainly intimate that other matters of profit passed to the eldest Son in point of descent Nor can I conceive how men should be induced to conceit that the custom of Gavelkind was the ancient general custom of the Germans It is true the words of the same Historian have misled some the words are Haeredes tamen successores cuique liberi these taken collectively I grant may import somewhat tending that way but they may as properly be taken disjunctively that the Children inherit by course and if none such were then the Brothers if they failed then uncles And it is not only evident that in the publick Succession to the Crown they had an eye this way but in the descent of private and particular estates as by many instances out of those old Histories may appear and had any other custom been general Alfreds rule by Moses Law had never succeeded nor could that other custom hold out against the constant desire of the Saxons to perpetuate their Families in greatness and honour all which besides the express Laws set forth in the Codes are in my conceit sufficient to induce an Historical Faith That the general course of descent was to the eldest Sons and not to all joyntly Nevertheless out of this Estate of Inheritance divers particular estates were created as well by common custom as by the especial act of the owner of such an estate Such of them as were wrought by custom was occasioned from Marriage whereby if the man was setled of such estate
of the like nature in Histories may appear The Conveyances formerly mentioned concerned Lands and Goods but if no such disposal of Goods were the ancient German custom carried them after the death of the ancestor promiscuously or rather in common to all the Children but in succeeding times the one half by the Law of Edmond passed to the relict of the party deceased by force of contract rather than course of descent After him Edward the Confessor recollecting the Laws declared that in case any one died intestate the Children should equally divide the Goods which I take to be understood with a salvo of the Wifes Dower or Portion As yet therefore the Ordinaries have nothing to do with the Administration for Goods passed by descent as well as Lands and upon this custom the Writ de rationabili parte bonorum was grounded at the Common-law as well for the Children as the Wifes part according as by the body of the Writ may appear CHAP. XLII Of times of Law and Vacancy SUch like as hath been shewed was the course of Government in those darker times nor did the fundamentals alter either by the diversity and mixture of people of several Nations in the first entrance nor from the Danes or Normans in their survenue not onely because in their original they all breathed one air of the Laws and Government of Greece but also they were no other than common dictates of nature refined by wise men which challenge a kinde of awe in the sense of the most barbarous I had almost forgot one circumstance which tended much to the honour of all the rest that is their speedy execution of Justice for they admitted no delays till upon experience they found that by staying a little longer they had done the sooner and this brought forth particular times of exemption as that of Infancy and Child-bearing in case of answering to criminal Accusations But more especially in case of regard of holiness of the time as that of the Lords day Saints days Fasts Ember days for even those days were had in much honour Nor onely days but seasons as from Advent to the Octaves of Epiphany from Septuagesima till Fifteen days after Easter or as by the Laws of the Confessor till Eight days after Easter and from Ascention to the Eighth day after Pentecost And though as Kings and times did change so these seasons might be diversly cut out as the Laws of Alfred Aethelstan Aetheldred Edgar Canutus and Edward do manifest yet all agreed in the season of the year and that some were more fit for holy observation than others And thus by the devotion of Princes and power of the Clergy the four Terms of the year were cut out for course of Law in the Kings Court the rest of the year being left vacant for the exercise and maintenance of Husbandry and particular callings and imployments saving that even in those times the Courts of the County and Hundred held their ancient and constant course Last of all and as a binding Law unto all it was provided that false Judges should give satisfaction to the party wronged by them and as the case required to forfeit the residue to the King to be disabled for ever for place of judicature and their lives left to the Kings mercy CHAP. XLIII The end of the Saxon Government ANd this far of the joynts of the Saxon Government in their Persons Precincts Courts Causes and Laws wherein as the distance will permit and according to my capacity I have endeavoured to refresh the Image of the Saxon Commonwealth the more curious lineaments being now disfigured by time Afar off it seems a Monarchy but in approach discovers more of a Democracy and if the temper of a body may appear by the prevailing humour towards age that Government did still appear more prevalent in all assaults both of time and change The first great change it felt was from the Danes that stormed them and shewed therein much of the wrath both of God and man. And yet they trenched not upon the fundamental Laws of the peoples Liberty The worst effect was upon the Church in the decay of the power of Religion and the Worship of God. For after much toil and loss both of sweat and bloud the Danes finding that little was to be gotten by blows but blows and that the Clergy at the least was the side-wind in the course of all affairs laid aside their Paganism and joyned with the Clergie and as their Converts and Pupils gained not onely their quiet residence but by the favour of the Clergie to make trial of the Throne and therein served the Clergie so well as they brought the people to a perfect Idolatry with times places and persons and subjection of their Estates to Church-Tributes And as at Tennis the Dane and Bishop served each other with the fond Country-man that whether Lord Dane or Lord-Bishop was the greater burthen is hard to be determined Thus became ambitious Prelacy in its full glory and the poor Church of Christ clouded in darkness and little hold left for recovery but onely by the liberty of the Saxon Freemen which the Danes could never conquer not for want of will or power but of time and occasion For the Crown returned to the Saxon-line again after the half age of one man although it was worn by three so God would have it nor did any monument of the Danish Government remain saving a few customs in some places which shew rather that the Danes were here than that they ruled here To sum up all The Saxon Common-wealth was a building of greatest strength downward even to the foundation arched together both for Peace and War. That by the Law of Decenners wherein Justice was the bond their Armies were gathered not by promiscuous flocking of people but by orderly concurrence of Families Kindreds and Decenners all chusing their own Leaders And so Honour Love and Trust conspired together to leave no mans life in danger nor death unrevenged It was a beautiful composure mutually dependant in every part from the Crown to the Clown the Magistrates being all choice men and the King the choicest of the chosen election being the birth of esteem and that of merit this bred love and mutual trust which made them as corner-stones pointed forward to break the wave of danger Nor was other reward expected by the great men but honour and admiration which commonly brought a return of acts of renown Lastly it was a regular frame in every part squared and made even by Laws which in the people ruled as Lex loquens and in the Magistrate as Lex intelligens all of them being grounded on the wisdom of the Greeks and Judicials of Moses Thus the Saxons became somewhat like the Jews distinct from all other people their Laws honourable for the King easie for the Subject and their Government above all other likest unto that of Christ's Kingdom whose
marry at their own will without paying Fine or Composition to the Lord and yet must have the liking of the Lord so far as to declare whether the man intended were his Enemy or not and fit to perform Knight-service This Law was therefore grounded upon the present distress of affairs wherein the Nation was unsetled and common right having established a mutual trust between Lord and Tenant found out this means to preserve the same for if the marriages of those that are related to the Tenant in such manner as may inherit part of all his Lands or have joynture therein should be left altogether at the liberty of the Tenant or his Widow it must needs follow that the mutual trust between Lord and Tenant must fail and the publick receive damage And therefore if this custom were of Norman birth it was begotten upon a Saxon Law and might the rather be owned by the English. The Widow of the King's Tenant having Children shall have her Dower and Portion so long as she keeps unmarried The portion here is in the Latine word maritagium which I take to be the Marriage portion given by the Husband according to the Saxon custom whenas the Dower in Land was not in use whereof is spoken formerly in that Chapter of Dower And the Normans were necessitated to introduce this custom of theirs with themselves partly because it was a priviledge which was their own by birth and it could not be waved without an evident wrong done to the Wives of these men who had ventured their lives in that service but principally because it would not consist with the work in hand to disclaim that custom which must needs be of infinite consequence in the effecting of what was principally sought after viz. the union of the two peoples Normans and Saxons into one I say it was principally sought after by the Norman Conquerour if not led thereto by his own genius yet necessitated thereto by force of reason of State as shall appear hereafter And what could be imagined a more ready way to stay the effusion of bloud and all other unhappy events of enmity than by taking away enmity it self or a more speedy and certain course for union than to reduce the Men and Women of each people to mutual society and to seal up all by a lasting bond of Marriage or greater encouragement for the comfortable proceedings therein than the setling of the constant maintenance of the Wife in case of survivorship by the Law of Dower of the Lands and Tenements of the Husband which was so full of contingencies and uncertainties in the portion of Goods that was by the Saxon Law appointed to the Wife in such case Nor was this all for by Marriage thus made to the Normans they had a great hold not so much over the English as in the English and that not onely during coverture but by reason of this title of Dower the Women became Tenants and under the Lords wing so as they durst not willingly and illegally offend their Lord in their Widowhood nor by Law nor reason match themselves and their Dowry to any other that was not first allowed by the Lord to be in friendship with him and thus became the Tenants Widows to be at the liking of the Lord for their marriage And the like hereto may be said concerning the Husband in case of Tenant by the courtesie and however by the Norman former practice it was much disturbed yet by Henry the first it was again reduced to its former right rather than original arising from his grant as some hold and proved advantageous for the ends aforesaid Now as touching their marriage-portion of Goods because the Saxon Law had already endowed them thereof they could not be induced to lay down their known ancient right till they found the new Law of Dower to settle and so for some time both Laws were in force until the more ancient Saxon law had an honourable burial Nevertheless for the present the Law abridged that right so far as to limit it to the Widow during Widowhood according to the former Saxon-law Upon consideration of all which it may well be conceived that the power of the Lords in consenting or dissenting to the marriages of their Tenants Widows and Wards was not so much an usurpation upon the Common right of the English Subjects as a custom rationally and with great wisdom as the course of affairs then stood upholden and allowed amongst them principally for the speedy setling of a peaceable Government and consolidating of two Nations into one and wherein England was then so happy as to come to a conclusion in seven years which cost their Ancestors night Two hundred years experience with the Britains besides a world of bloud-shed that might have been spared e're they could find out the right way to a desired peace by mutual marriages had between them Such Widow shall have the custody of the Lands of such Children or otherwise such other person as by right ought to have the same This is the first news of Wardships that passed abroad cum privilegio of a received Law which together with the former declare the right custom of the Normans and thereby the injustas consuetudines quibus Anglioe regnum opprimebatur viz. Arbitrary Relief taken of the Tenant's Estate arbitrary Marriages made of their Peersons and arbitrary Grants of Guardianship of their Lands For as yet oppression was not so high-flown as to cast the government of the persons of their Wards out of the view of the Lords provisionary care upon adventure of the next in Law whether man or woman wise or unwise under pretence to train him up in military service fit for the Lord 's own safety and the Kingdoms lifeguard But it was the proper ground of the Lord 's own seisure and right of Wardship he being looked upon by the eye of common reason as the onely meet man that both could and would effect that work so as might be most advantageous to the publick which seemed to be chiefly concerned herein And upon the same general ground the survey of fools accompanied the former albeit it was not in practice till Henry the First brought it in as the Mirror of Justice saith fol. 258. yet it came upon an ancient foundation laid in the time of the Danes For my own part I will not dispute the point whether this custom of Wardship was purely Norman or whether it was derived from the Saxons anciently who possibly might have some respect to Orphans in such cases to train them up for the publick service in point of War especially being possessors of a known right of Relief as well as Alfred the Saxon King did undertake the work for the training of some such particular persons in Learning for the service of the Publick in time of peace and civil Government Yet thus much appeareth that Guardianship of Lands was a known Custom
enough to make and maintain a right and that it by Law was a right belonging to some persons before others and that this had been a custom before the former unjust customs crept into the Government of the Conquerour and principally of his Son Rufus And though it be questionable whether it setled first upon the Normans or the English yet it is manifest that if one people had it the other people now coming into union with that people could not in reason except against that custom which the other people had taken up upon so honourable grounds as reason of State which as the times then were was evident and superlative especially the customs being under the regulating of Law and not of any Arbitrary power and can be no Presidents of Relief Marriage and Wardship that after-ages usurped Tenants in Knight-service shall hold their Lands c. acquitted of all Taxes that they may be more able to provide Arms and be more ready and fit for the Kings service and defence of the Kingdom This Law whether it be a renewing of a former custom or an introduction of a new Law it is clear it was upon an old ground That Tenants by Knight-service must be ready for the service of their Lord and defence of the Kingdom whereof afterwards But the Law is that these men shall hold their Lands of that Tenure acquitted of all Taxes though legally imposed upon the body of the Kingdom which must be conceived to be for the publick benefit viz. either for the preparation or maintenance of publick War for in such cases it hath been in all times held unreasonable that those whose persons are employed to serve in the Wars should hold Lands doubly charged to the same service viz. to the defraying of their own private expences in the War and maintenance of the publick charge of the same War besides CHAP. LIII Of divers Laws made concerning the execution of Justice ALthough in proceedings in Cases of vindicative Justice Delinquents might seem to be left rather to the fury than mercy of the Law yet so long as men are under the Law and not without the Law it hath been always held a part of Justice to extend what moderation might possibly stand with the honour of the Law and that otherwise an over-rigid and fierce prosecution of the guilty is no less tyranny than the prosecution of the not-guilty and although violence was the proper vice of these times yet this point of honour must be given to the Normans That their Sword had Eyes and moved not altogether by Rage but by Reason No Sentence shall pass but upon averment of the complaint by Accuser or Witnesses produced Fine and Pledges shall be according to the quantity of the offence By these two Laws of Henry the first the Subjects were delivered from three great oppressions First in making them offenders without Complaint or Witness Secondly in imposing immoderate Fines Lastly in urging extraordinary Bail. Forfeiture of Felons Lands is reduced to a year and a day The Normans had reduced the Saxon law in this case unto their own Last which stretched their desire as far as the estate would bear but this being so prejudicial to the immediate Lords who were no offenders in this case and so contrary to the Saxon law it was both done and undone in a short space by the allowance of Henry the first Intent of Criminal offences manifested by Act punished by Fine or Mulct This by Alfred's Law was punished by Talioes Law but now by a Law of Henry the first reduced to Mulcts Mainperners are not to be punished as Principals unless they be parties or privies to the failing of the Principal This Law of Henry the first repealed the former Law of Canutus which must be acknowledged to be rigorous although not altogether without reason No person shall be imprisoned for committing of a mortal Crime unless first he be attained by Verdict of Twelve men By imprisonment is intended close imprisonment or imprisonment without Bail or Mainprize for otherwise it is apparent that as well by the Saxon as Norman Laws men were brought to Trial by restraint Appeals of Murder restrained within the fourth degree Before this Law Appeals were brought by any of the bloud or kin of the party slain but now by Henry the first restrained The ground seems to be for that affection that runs with the bloud grows so cold beyond the fourth degree that the death of the party is of so small account as it can scarcely be reputed a loss of such consequence to the party as to expose the life or price of the life of the Manslayer unto the claim of such an one And thus the Saxon law that gave the satisfaction in such case to the whole kinred became limited to the fourth degree as I conceive from the Ecclesiastical constitution concerning marriage Two things more concerning juridical proceedings may be noted the one concerning speedy course of Justice wherein they may seem to justifie the Saxon way but could never attain to their pace in regard they yielded so much time to Summons Essoyns c. The other concerns election of Judges by the parties for this we find in the Laws of Henry the first CHAP. LIV. Of the Militia during the Normans time THe power of Militia is either the Legislative or Executory power the Legislative power without contradiction rested in the grand Council of the Kingdom to whom it belonged to establish Laws for the government of the Kingdom in time of peace And this will appear in the preparation for War the levying of War and managing thereof after it is levied For the preparation it consisteth in levying men and munition or of money In all which questionless will be a difference between raising of War by a King to revenge a personal injury done to the King 's own person and a War raised by the whole Kingdom or representative body thereof which is commonly done in defence of publick interest and seldom in any offensive way unless in recovery of a right possession either formerly lost or as yet not fully setled Now although it be true that seldom do injuries reflect upon the King's person alone but that the Kingdom will be concerned therein to endeavour a remedy yet because it may fall out otherwise and Kings have taken occasion to levy War of their own accord in such case they could neither compel the persons of their Subjects or their Estates to be contributary And of this nature I take the War levied by Harold against the Conquerour to be wherein the greatest part of the Kingdom was never engaged nor therefore did it feel the dint of the Conquerour's Sword at all and in this case the Militia must be allowed to such as bear the purse nor can it be concluded to be the Militia of the Kingdom nor any part thereof although the Kingdom may connive thereat But to
set this consideration aside as not co-incident at all with the Norman engagements after they were crowned and to take all the subsequent Wars to be meerly defensive of the right of the Crown as in sober construction they will appear to be as touching the levying of money 't is evident that it lay onely in the power of the grand Council of the Kingdom for otherwise the Laws were setled that no Tax should be made or taken but such as were due in the Confessor's time as formerly hath been shewed Secondly for the preparing of men and munition it was done either by Tenure or by special Law. As touching Tenure it was provided by way of contract that those that held by Knight-service should be ready with their Arms to assist the King for the defence of the Realm So as they were not bound by their Tenure to aid him in any other cases Others were also by especial Law of the Land bound to be ready for their service in that kind For all the Inhabitants of this Kingdom held their Estates under a general service which by common right they are bound to perform viz. in time of danger to joyn in defence of their Country This is the common Fealty or Allegiance which all men owe and which if neglected or refused renders the party guilty of Treason against his Country and his Estate under the penalty of forfeiture according to the old Saxon Law revived and declared by Henry the first Thus the Law made preparation for the War both of Men and Arms. Castles and Forts were likewise either first made by the order of the grand Council or otherwise allowed by them for the defence of the Commons and the Kingdom so was the Law of William the first The levying and managing of the War must not be denied de jure to belong to the representative body so far as may consist with the directory part for that it is a main part of the Government of the Kingdom in times of War And therefore Henry the first amongst his Laws made in the ordinary course of Law-making provideth for the ordering of men in the Army in the field and established a Law that such as forsook their Colours or Associates in the field during the Battle should be punished with death and forfeiture of his whole Estate Nor yet can it be denied but that de facto Kings of their own accord and by secret Council did direct therein either in the vacancy of Parliament which was the general case of the first times of the Norman Conquerour and the whole Reign of William Rufus or by connivance of the grand Council while they saw nothing done but what was well done Nor can it be rationally said that Kings by such advice as they have in the recess of the grand Council levying War in defence of the publick according to rules do otherwise than their duty or if the grand Council look on see nothing misgoverned and say nothing that they do other than is meet For it must be remembred that Kings in their first original were rather Officers for War than Peace and so are holden by all Antiquity and as Generals in War were called Reges or Imperatores by the Grecians Romans and Germans And at such times as War was concluded at the general meeting of the people they chose their Dux or Rex call him which you please and he being chosen all bound themselves to be at his command and to defend his person So as while a King keepeth within his place in time of danger it is his duty first to stir himself and stir up the rest to lead them and order them as may be most for the publick defence and to govern the Army by such Laws as are or shall be established by order of the publick Meeting and in case of sudden exigencies to use his own wits and in all this is the common liberty no whit infringed in regard that all is for the publick defence to which the Knights are bound by their Tenures and all others by the Law. And this was this Kingdoms case in the Normans time that both Leaders and Souldiers whether by election of the people or prescription yet all served for the defence of the Kingdom Nor were they compellable to any other service inconsistent therewith nor to stand to any judgement in such cases differing from or contrary to that of the Parliament it self CHAP. LV. That the entry of the Normans into this Island could not be by Conquest THat in point of fact the entry of the Normans into England was not by Conquest will sufficiently appear from what hath been already noted I shall make one step further and shew that as affairs then stood with the Conquerour it was impossible for him to merit that name against the stream of Providence that had pre-engaged him to three sorts of men viz. the Normans the Clergie and the Commons of England It must be taken for a ground that Duke William must give all fair correspondency to the Normans considering they are Members of his own Body and the Arm of his Strength without which he could do nothing And it is not less certain that however the Sea divided the two Countries yet long before the arrival of the Army the Normans and Saxons were so well acquainted by the latter access of the Danes that partly by marriage and other interests the Normans made so great a party in England as that party merited no less from the Duke in his entrance than those he brought with him And therefore both they and their Allies in all reason must expect such reward of their faithfulness to him as the other had nor could the Duke deny the same unless he had disclaimed his own interests whereof he had none to spare Secondly their merit from the Duke was accompanied with no less mutual relation to his Army being of the same blood with themselves and of ancient acquaintance and as impossible it was for the Duke to keep them from consociation with the mixed people as to abstract the mixed people each from other one or both of which must be done and the Conquerours must be kept from incorporating with the conquered or else the Law of Conquest cannot hold Thirdly if these two had failed yet had the Duke by his manner of rewarding his Army disabled himself from holding however he might seem to have by conquest Thus was his gift of Mannors Lands and Franchises unto his Souldiers compleated with their ancient Rights and Priviledges in free service otherwise it had been little better than a Trap to bring his own men into bondage who lately were free Souldiers under no better than a Duke of their own election And their Government in their own Country however big yet had not brought forth a Soveraignty into the World their Duke no compleat King nor themselves so mean as Vassals and it was equally difficult for him to get
It seemeth also that the loss not onely of Chattels and Goods but also of Lands c. extended to Outlawries I conceive in case of Felony and the King's Pardon in such case could not bind the Lord's right of Escheat although it might discharge the Goods and the year and day whereunto the King was entitled which case alone sufficiently declareth what power Kings had in the Estates of their Subjects Manslaughter made not bailable This was Law in Henry the second 's time although it crossed the Norman Law and questionless it was upon good ground for the times now were not as those in the Conquerour's times when shedding of Bloud was accounted Valour and in most cases in order to the publick service And now it seems it was a growing evil and that cried so loud as though in case of Treason bail might be allowed yet not in this case ubi ad terrorem aliter statutum est saith the Author Robbers shall be committed to the Sheriff or in his absence to the next Castelane who shall deliver him to the Sheriff And the Justices shall do right to them and unto Trespassers upon Land. By the Conquerour's Law these Offenders were bailable and I conceive this was no Repeal thereof and the rather because Glanvil alloweth of Pledges in all cases except Manslaughter yea in those Crimes that did wound Majesty it self although they concern the destruction of the King's person or Sedition in the Kingdom or Army thereof The Justices herein mentioned were intended to be the Justices itinerant and the Trespasses upon Land are meant such as are contra pacem Domini Regis as riotous and forcible Entries for some Trespasses were against the peace of the Sheriff as formerly hath been observed Fauxonry is of several degrees or kinds some against the King others against other men and of those against the King some are punished as Wounds of Majesty as falsifying the King's Charter and whether falsifying of Money were in that condition or not I leave or falsifying of Measures yet more inferiour I cannot determine but it is clear by Glanvil that falsifying of the Deed of a private person was of smaller consideration and at the utmost deserved but loss of Member Inheritances may not be aliened Inheritances were in those times of Lands or Goods for it was the custom then that the personal Estate the Debts deducted was divisible into three parts one whereof belonged in right to the Wife as her reasonable part the other to the Heir and a third to the Testator to make his Will of them and of the other two parts he could not dispose by Will. Concerning Lands it was regularly true that no man could alien his whole Inheritance to the disherisin of his Heir either by Act in his life-time or any part thereof by his last Will without the concurrence of the Heir But of purchased Lands he may give part by Act executed in his life-time though he have no Lands by inheritance and if he hath no Issue then he may alien all And where a man hath Lands by inheritance and also by purchase he may alien all his purchased Lands as he pleaseth If the Lands be holden in Gavel-kind no more of the Inheritance can be conveyed to any of the Children than their proportionable parts will amount unto This Law of Inheritance was divers according to the Tenure for the Lands in Knights-service always descended to the Heir but such as were holden in Socage passed according to the custom either to the eldest or to the youngest or to all equally And thus stood the general state of Inheritance from the Normans time hitherto seeming somewhat too strait for the Free men that by Law of Property might challenge a power to do with their own as they pleased But the Normans saw a double prejudice herein the first was the danger of ruine of many of their Families who now ingrafted into the English stock and yet not fully one might expect a late check to their preferments from the Saxon Parents after a long and fair semblance made of their good Will. The second prejudice was the decay of their Militia which was maintained by Riches more than by multitude of men partly because that rich men are most fearful of offending and therefore ordinarily are most serviceable both with their Bodies and Estates against publick dangers and partly because by their Friends and Allies they bring more aid unto the publick by engaging them in the common Cause that otherwise might prove unsensible of the condition of their Country The Heir of a Free-man shall by descent be in such seisin as his Ancestor had at the time of his death doing service and paying relief and shall have his Chattels If the Heir be under age the Lord shall have the Wardship for the due time and the Wife her Dower and part of the Goods If the Lord with-hold seisin the King's Justice shall try the matter by twelve men The first of these branches is declaratory of a ground of common Law but being applied to the last is an introduction of a new Law of tryal of the Heir 's Right by Assize of Mortdancester where formerly no remedy was left to the Heir but a Writ of Right If these three branches be particularly observed they speak of three sorts of Heirs of Tenants by Knight-service viz. such as are Majors or of full age and such as are Minors or under age and such as are of a doubtful age Those that are of full age at the death of their Ancestors may possess the Lands descended and the Lord may not disseize him thereof but may be resisted by the Heir in the maintenance of his possession so as he be ready to pay Relief and do service that is due and if the Lord expel him he shall have remedy by Assize Those Heirs that are Minors shall be under the Lord's guardianship till they come to one and twenty years The Heirs of such as hold by Socage are said to be at full age at fifteen years because at that age they were thought able to do that service but the Sons of Burgesses are then said to be of full age when they have ability to manage their Father's Calling such as telling of Money measuring of Cloath and the like yet doth not Glanvil or any other say that these were their full age to all purposes albeit that some Burroughs at this day hold the last in custom to all intents whatsoever The last branch provideth the remedy to recover to the Heir his possession in case it be detained either through doubtfulness of age of the Heir or his Title and it directs the Issue to be tryed by twelve men This tryal some have thought to be of Glanvil's invention and it may well be that this tryal of this matter as thus set down was directed by him yet he useth often in his book the word solet and in his Preface
saith That he will set down frequentius usitata and it is past question but that the tryal by twelve men was much more ancient as hath been already noted One thing more yet remaineth concerning the Widow of the Tenant whose Dower is not onely provided for but her reasonable part of her Husband 's personal Estate The original hereof was from the Normans and it was as popular as that of Wardships was Regal and so they made the English women as sure to them as they were sure of their Children The Justices shall by Assize try Disseisins done since the King 's coming over Sea next after the peace made between him and his Son. This is called the Assize of Novel disseisin or of disseisins lately made It seems that the limitation was set for the Justices sake who now were appointed to that work which formerly belonged to the County-courts and to prevent intrenchments of Courts a limitation was determined although the copy seemeth to be mistaken for the limitation in the Writ is from the King 's last Voyage or going into Normandy Justices shall do right upon the King 's Writ for half a Knights Fee and under unless in cases of difficulty which are to be referred to the King. The Justices itinerant ended the smaller matters in their Circuits the other were reserved to the King in his Bench. Justices shall enquire of Escheats Lands Churches and Women in the King's gift And of Castle-guard who how much and where So as the Judges itinerant had the work of Escheators and made their Circuits serve as well for the King's profit as justice to the Subjects They used also to take Fealty of the people to the King at one certain time of the year and to demand Homage also These matters of the King's Exchequer made the presence of the Judges less acceptable and it may be occasioned some kind of oppression And as touching Castle-guard it was a Tenure in great use in these bloody times and yet it seemeth they used to take Rent instead of the personal service else had that enquiry how much been improper Of a Tenants holding and of several Lords That one man may hold several Lands of several Lords and so owe service to them all is so common as nothing can be more nevertheless it will not be altogether out of the way to touch somewhat upon the nature of this mutual relation between Lord and Tenant in general that the true nature of the diversity may more fully appear The foundation or subject of service was a piece of Land or other Tenement at the first given by the Lord to the Tenant in affirmance of a stipulation between them presupposed by the giving and receiving whereof the Tenant undertook to peform service to the Lord and the Lord undertook protection of the Tenant in his right to that Tenement The service was first by service solemnly bound either by Oath which the Lord or his Deputy by the Common-Law hath power to administer as in the case of Fealty in which the Tenant bound himself to be true to the honour and safety of his Lords person and to perform the service due to the Lord for the Tenement so given or otherwise by the Tenants humble acknowledgment and promise not only to perform the services due but even to be devoted to the Lords service to honour him and to adventure limb and life and be true and faithful to the Lord. This is called Homage from those words I become your man Sir and yet promiseth upon the matter no more but fealty in a deeper complement albeit there be difference in the adjuncts belonging to eách For though it be true that by promise of being the Lord's man a general service may seem to be implied yet in regard that it is upon occasion only of that present Tenure it seemeth to me that it is to be restrained only to those particular services which belong to that Tenement and therefore if that Tenement be holden in Socage although the Tenant be bound to homage yet that homage ties not the Tenant to the service of a Knight nor contrarily doth the homage of a Tenant in Knight-service tie him to that of Socage upon the command of his Lord though he professeth himself to be his man. Nor doth the Tenant's homage bind him against all men nor ad semper for in case he holdeth of two or divers Lords by homage for several Tenements and these two Lords be in War one against the other the Tenant must serve his chief Lord of whom the Capital house is holden or that Lord which was his by priority who may be called the chief Lord because having first received homage he received it absolutely from his Tenant with a saving of the Tenant's Faith made to other Lords and to the King who in order to the publick had power to command a Tenant into War against his own Lord. If therefore he be commanded by the King in such cases unto War he need not question the point of forfeiture but if he be commanded by a chief of his other Lords into War against a party in which another of his Lords is engaged his safest way is to enter upon the work because of his Allegiance to that Lord yet with a salvo of his fealty to that other Lord. But in all ordinary cases Tenants and Lords must have regard to their stipulation for otherwise if either break the other is discharged for ever and if the fault be in the Tenant his Tenement escheats to his Lord and if the Lord fail he loses his Tenure and the Tenant might thenceforth disclaim and hold over for ever Nevertheless the Lords had two Priviledges by common custom belonging to their Tenures which although not mentioned in the stipulation were yet more valuable than all the rest the one concerning matter of profit the other of power That of profit consisted in aids and relief The aids were of three kinds one to make the Lords eldest Son Knight the other to marry his eldest Daughter the third to help him to pay a relief to his Lord Paramount which in my opinion sounds as much as if the Tenants were bound by their Tenures to aid their Lord in all cases of extraordinary charge saving that the Lord could not distrain his Tenant for aid to his War and this according to the Lords discretion for Glanvil saith that the Law determined nothing concerning the quantity or value of these aids These were the Norman ways and savoured so much of Lordship that within that age they were regulated But that of reliefs was an ancient sacrifice as of first-fruits of the Tenement to the Lord in memorial of the first Lords favour in conferring that Tenement and it was first setled in the Saxons time The Lords Priviledge of power extended so far as to distrain his Tenants into his own Court to answer to himself in all causes that concerned his
right and so the Lord became both Judge and Party which was soon felt and prevented as shall appear hereafter Another priviledge of the Lords power was over the Tenants Heir after the Tenants death in the disposing of the Body during the minority and marriage of the same As touching the disposing of the Body the Lord either retained the same in his own power or committed the same to others and this was done either pleno jure or rendring an account As concerning the marriage of the Females that are Heirs or so apparent the Parents in their life-time cannot marry them without the Lords consent nor may they marry themselves after their Parents death without the same and the Lords are bound to give their consent unless they can shew cause to the contrary The like also of the Tenants Widows that have any Dowry in the Lands of such Tenure And by such-like means as these the power of the Barons grew to that height that in the lump it was too massie both for Prince and Commons Of the power of the last Will. It is a received opinion that at the common-Law no man could devise his Lands by his last Will. If thereby it be conceived to be against common reason I shall not touch that but if against custom of the ancient times I must suspend my concurrence therewith until those ancient times be defined for as yet I find no testimony sufficient to assert that opinion but rather that the times hitherto had a sacred opinion of the last Will as of the most serious sincere and advised declaration of the most inward desires of a man which was the main thing looked unto in all Conveyances Voluntas donatoris de caetero observetur And therefore nothing was more ordinary than for Kings in these times as much as in them did lie to dispose of their Crowns by their last Will. Thus King John appointed Henry the Third his Successour and Richard the first devised the Crown to King John and Henry the first gave all his Lands to his Daughter and William the Conqueror by his last Will gave Normandy to Robert England to William and to Henry his Mothers Lands If then these things of greatest moment under Heaven were ordinarily disposed by the last Will was it then probable that the smaller Free-holds should be of too high esteem to be credited to such Conveyances I would not be mistaken as if I thought that Crowns and Empires were at the disposal of the last Will of the possessor nor do I think that either they were thus in this Kingdom or that there is any reason that can patronize that opinion yet it will be apparent that Kings had no sleight conceit of the last Will and knew no such infirmity in that manner of conveyance as is pretended or else would they never have spent that little breath left them in vain I have observed the words of Glanvil concerning this point and I cannot find that he positively denyeth all conveyance of Land by Will but only in case of disherison the ground whereof is because it is contrary to the conveyance of the Law and yet in that case also alloweth of a disposing power by consent of the Heir which could never make good conveyance if the Will in that case were absolutely void and therefore his Authority lies not in the way Nor doth the particular customs of places discountenance but rather advance this opinion for if devises of Lands were incident to the Tenure in Gavel-kind and that so general in old time as also to the burgage Tenures which were the rules of Corporations and Cities Vbi Leges Angliae deperiri non possunt nec defraudari nec violari how can it be said contrary to the common Law And therefore those Conveyances of Lands by last Will that were in and after these times holden in use seem to me rather remnants of the more general custom wasted by positive Laws than particular customs growing up against the common rule It is true that the Clergy put a power into the Pope to alter the Law as touching themselves in some cases for Roger Arch-bishop of York procured a faculty from the Pope to ordain that no Ecclesiastical persons Will should be good unless made in health and not lying in extremity and that in such cases the Arch-bishop should possess himself of all such parties goods but as it lasted not long so was himself made a president in the case for being overtaken with death e're he was provided he made his Will in his sickness and Henry the Second possessed himself of his Estate And it is as true that Feme coverts in these days could make no Will of their reasonable part because by the Saxon Law it belonged joyntly to the Children Nor could Vsurers continuing in that course at the time of their death make their Will because their personal Estate belonged to the King after their death and their Lands to their Lords by escheat although before death they lie open to no censure of Law but this was by an especial Law made since the Conquerour's time for by the Saxon-Law they were reputed as Out-Laws Nevertheless all these do but strengthen the general rule viz. That regularly the last Will was holden in the general a good conveyance in Law. If the Will were only intended and not perfected or no Will was made then the Lands passed by descent and the goods held course according to the Saxon Law viz. the next Kinsmen and Friends of the intestate did administer and as administrators they might sue by Writ out of the Kings Court although the Clergy had now obtained so much power as for the recovery of a Legacy or for the determining of the validity of the Will in its general nature it was transmitted to the Ecclesiastical Court. CHAP. LXIII Of the Militia of this Kingdom during the Reign of these Kings I Undertake not the debate of right but as touching matter of fact shortly thus much that from the Norman times the power of the Militia rested upon two principles the one the Allegiance for the common defence of the King's person and honour and Kingdom and in this case the King had the power to levy the force of the Kingdom nevertheless the cause was still under the cognizance of the great Council so far as to agree or disavow the War if they saw cause as appeared in the defections of the Barons in the quarrel between King Steven and the Empress and between King John and his Barons The other principle was the service due to the Lord from the Tenant and by vertue hereof especially whenas the liberty of the Commons was in question the Militia was swayed by the Lords and they drew the people in Arms either one way or the other as the case appeared to them the experience whereof the Kings from time to time felt to their extream prejudice and the Kingdoms
that they may not appear to be Clerks 16. Justices itinerant do imprison Clerks defamed for Felony or otherwise out-law them if they do not appear And otherwise proceed against Clerks after their purgation before the Ordinary 18. The Lay-power seizes upon the Estates of Clerks degraded for Crimes 19. Clergie are compelled to answer and give satisfaction for offences against the Forest-Laws before the Lay-power And in case of default the Bishop by distress is compelled to order satisfaction as well in such cases as in personal Actions 22. Priviledges of Sanctuary are invaded by force 23. Executors of Bishops are hindred from administring the Estate without License first obtained from the King. 24. The King's Tenants Goods are seized after their decease by the King's Bayliffs 25. Intestates goods are seized by their Lords and their Ordinary hindred from Administration 26. The King's prohibition passeth in case of Tythes and Chappels 27. The like in cases of Troth plight Perjury Cerage Heriet or other Church-duties as money for reparations of Churches and fences in Church-yards pecuniary punishment for Adultery and costs of suit in Ecclesiastical Court Sacriledge Excommunication for breach of the Liberties of the Church contrary to the Grand Charter 30. In cases of prohibition if the Ecclesiastical Judge proceed contrary to the same he is attached and compelled to shew his Acts in Court if the Lay-Judge determine the cause to be Temporal the Ecclesiastical Judge is amerced if he proceed against the prohibition and it is tryed by Witnesses of two ribaulds and in case it be found for the Ecclesiastical Judges cognizance yet there is no costs allowed for such vexation 32. That Jews in matters Ecclesiastical aforesaid are by the King's prohibition drawn from the Ecclesiastical Judge unto the Lay-Magistrate 34. Question about Lands given in Frankalmoin are tryed in the Lay-Courts and by reason of such Tenure the owners though Clergie men are compelled to do suit at the Lay-Courts and are charged with impositions and are distrained hereunto although the Lord have other Land of the Donor in Frankalmoin subject to his distress 39. Prelates summoned to higher Courts are not allowed to make Attorneys to appear for them in the inferiour civil Courts 41. Grantees of Murage or other unwonted impositions compel the Church-men to pay the same 42 43. The Clergie are charged with Quarter Cart-service and purveying 44. The Chancery sendeth out new Writs contrary to the liberties of the Church and the Law of the Land without the assent of the Council of the Kingdom Princes and Prelates 45. The King doth compel the Clergie to Benevolences to the King at his Voyage into foreign parts 46. Amercements granted to Clergie-men are turned into Fines by the Justices and by them taken 47. Clergie-men are fined for want of appearance before the Justices itinerant and of the Forest upon common summons 48. Quo warranto's granted against the Clergie for their Liberties and the same seized unless they be set down in express words in their Charter notwithstanding that by long custom they have enjoyed the same and many times contrary to express grant This is the sum of their Paper of Grievances and because they found the King either wilful or unconstant they resolve upon a Remedy of their own by Excommunication and Interdiction not sparing the persons of any principal or accessory nor their Lands no not of the King himself and for this they joyn all as one man. Now what scare this made I know not but Henry the third in the Stat. of Marlb and Edward the first in his Stat. at Westminster and other Statutes the first spake fair and seemed to redress some of these complaints as also did Edward the second and yet the Common Law lost little ground thereby That which Henry the third did besides his promises of reforming was done in the Stat. of Marlbridge The successors of Abbots Priors and Prelates c. shall have an Action of Trespass for Trespasses done nigh before the death of their decessors upon the Estates of their Corporations And shall prosecute an Action begun by their Predecessors And also shall have an Assize against Intruders into any of the Possessions belonging to the said Corporations whereof their Predecessors died seized This might seem a remedy provided against the first Malady complained of and questionless bound all but the King and so might perchance abate somewhat the edge of that Article But it being the Clergies reach to grow rich and the Pope's cunning to help on that Work that they might be as stores for supply of his Treasury and had forbidden Abbots and other Prelates c. the liberty of disposing their Estates by last Will Kings therefore as supreme Patrons to these bodies in their vacancies used to seize all the Estates of the Prelates with the Temporalities to their own use as well to preserve the Riches of the Kingdom to it self and the possessions of such Corporations from spoil as to be a cloke of their own covetousness And under the Estates of the Prelates or Heads of these Corporations all the Goods and Chattels belonging to the said Corporations were comprehended in regard that all was by Law adjudged to be in the sole possession of such Head and without whom all the rest were accounted but as dead persons No Clergie-man is bound to attend at the Sheriff's Turn William the Conquerour first exempted the persons of the Clergy from attendance upon Temporal Courts yet they were still urged thereto and especially by a Law in Henry the first 's time but by this Law they are discharged and in some measure a provision made against the grievance in the 39th Article before-mentioned These amends we find made to the Clergie by Henry the third besides his confirming the Grand Charter And his Son Edward the first pursued the same course especially in his first times when he was but tenderly rooted as may appear in the Statute of West 1. Clergie-men nor their Houses shall be charged with Quarter nor their Goods with Purveyance or Cart-service under peril of imprisonment and damages by action or imprisonment The great endowments of Lands Rents and Revenues given to the Church-men by the Laity was for the maintenance of Hospitality and works of Charity The Founders and Benefactors hereby obtained a right of Corody or Entertainment at such places in nature of Free-quarter which in the necessitous times of Henry the third became so common that every one that had power never questioned right and the King above all the rest By means whereof the Church-revenues were exceedingly wasted for remedy whereof all Offenders are by this Statute made liable to fine and imprisonment and double damages in case of Action of Trespass the King onely excepted against whom they had no defence but would rather have won him to have been their defence against the exactions from Rome that
if they receive them stocked The first of these is the Law of common reason for it is contrary to Guardianship to destroy that which by their office they ought to preserve As touching the words of the Law the Grantees are omitted in the Charter of King John and also their Assignees albeit that doubtless they were within the intent and meaning of the Law. The matter declares plainly not onely the oppression of Lords upon their Wards but also the corruption even of the Law itself that at the first aimed at the good of the Publick and honour of Knight-service but now was degenerated into the base desire of profit by making market of the Wards Estates and Marriages that brought in strip and waste of Estates and niggardly neglect of the education and training up of the persons of the Wards and an imbasing of the generation of mankind and spoil of times Nor did these times ever espy or provide against the worst of these but onely endeavoured to save the estate by punishing the wasters in damages by this Law and by forfeiture of the Wardship by a Law made in the time of Edward the First and this as well for Waste done during the time of the custody as in the life-time of his Ancestors by another Law in Edward the First 's time And because the Escheators and their under-Officers used to serve themselves out of the Estates of Minors before they certified to the King his right and those were not within the Law of Magna Charta or at least not so reputed It was therefore afterwards provided that these also should render damages in a Writ of Waste to be brought against them The marriage of Wards shall be without disparagement It was an ancient Law among the Germans and the Saxons brought it hither and as a Law setled it that Marriage must be amongst equals but this the Danes and Normans slighted and yet it continued and was revived Now as the Lord had the tuition of the Ward instead of the Ancestor so had he the care of the marriage in such manner as the Ancestor might have had if he had lived For in case the Ward were stoln and married the Delinquent suffered fine and imprisonment Or if the Ward married without the Lord's consent he shall have the double value and hold the Land over till satisfaction But in case the Lord marrieth the Ward within fourteen years of age to its disparagement he shall lose his Wardship thereby And if the Ward refuseth to accept of a marriage tendred by the Lord before her age of sixteen years the Lord shall hold the Lands till he have received the full value and in case where one Tenant holdeth of divers Lords the Lords by priority shall have the marriage These Laws were in use during the Reigns of those Kings although it cannot be certainly concluded hereby that the Wives portion properly belonged to the Lord as for his own benefit partly because the Female-Wards should have no advancement if it belonged to the Lords and partly because this forfeiture was given to the Lords in nature of a penalty as appeareth by the frame of the Statute of Merton Widows shall have their Dower inheritance their inheritance which they have joyntly with their Husbands their marriage freely and their Quarentine With due regard of the opinion of others I shall propound my own It seemeth to me that the King is within this Law as well as within the former Laws of the Normans and those of Henry the Second that are of this kind and as he is within the compass of every Law of this Charter and that it is called the Grand Charter as most immediately coming from the King to the people and not from the Lords Nor is there any ground that the Law should intend to give liberty to Widows of Wards belonging to inferiour Lords to marry whom they will and that onely the Kings Widows shall be bound Nor did this suit with the contest between the Barons and the King that their Widows should be bound unto the King and the Widows of their Tenants discharged from their tuition and therefore I conceive by the word maritagium is not meant liberty of Marriage but her Marriage-portion or rationabilis pars according to the foregoing Laws of Henry the First and Henry the Second and the Saxon Customs But as touching the liberty of Marriage it is defined and expressed that the Widows shall not be compelled to marry nevertheless if they shall marry they must marry with the Lord's liking otherwise he might have an enemy to be his Tenant that might instead of homage and service prove Traitor and be his ruine Lastly touching the Widows dwelling the Law thought it unreasonable that she should immediately after the death of her Husband be exposed to be harbourless and therefore ordained that she might continue in her Husband's house Forty days if it were not a Castle and then she was to have another dwelling assigned to her because by common intendment she is not supposed to be a person meet to defend a Castle and this was called her Quarentine which I meet not with amongst the Saxon Laws and therefore suppose it to be of Norman original No Man's Land shall be seized for Debt to the King so long as the Personal Estate will satisfie Nor shall his pledge be troubled so long as the Principal is sufficient unless he refuse to satisfie and then the pledge shall recover in value The first part hereof was the issue of the Law concerning elegit formerly observed in the Saxon times for the regard of Law principally extended unto the person next unto the Free-hold and lastly unto the goods The latter part of this Law was the Law of Pledges or Decenners in the same times unto which the Reader may resort for further light herein The City of London and other Cities Burroughs and Towns and the Cinque-ports and other Ports shall enjoy their ancient Liberties The whole Kingdom and the Members thereof herein expressed had all their Liberties saved from the dint of Conquest by the Law of William the first upon which although some of the succeeding Kings did invade yet none of them made any absolute disseisin although disturbance in some particulars But King John did not only confirm them by his grand Charters but by particular Charters to each Corporation with some enlargements and in his grand Charter inserted one clause which in the grand Charter of Henry the Third appeareth not which thus ensueth Et ad habendum commune concilium Regni de auxiliis assidendis aliter quam in tribus casibus praedictis which if the barbarism of the Latine mislead me not is thus in English And to have right of Common-Council or to be of the Common-Council of the Kingdom for the assessing of aids other than in three cases aforesaid viz. for
redemption of their Captive King for Knighting of the Kings Son and for his Daughters Marriage because these three might be due by the Common-Law the two latter by custom the former by common right although mentioned from the late disaster of King Richard which King John might with shame enough remember and expect the same measure from the censure of an unquiet conscience I shall not enter into debate concerning the omission hereof in the later Charters possibly it might seem a tautology Nor concerning the restriction as if it did imply that the Burgesses had Vote only in cases of general assesments but shall leave it to the consideration of the Reader No Distress shall be taken for greater service or other matter than is due Distresses are in nature no other than a summons in act or the bringing of a man to answer by seizure of part of his Goods and it was used by the Saxons as hath been shewed and because the rich men under colour of seeking their right many times sought for wrong and though they could not prevail in the issue yet prevailed so far that the Defendant could not escape without charge and hinderance therefore the Law provided a Writ of remedy against unjust vexation which Glanvil remembreth us of and yet because that remedy also carried with it matter of charge and disturbance to the Plaintiff and so the remedy might be worse than the disease therefore the Law defined distresses by circumstances of person matter time and place under penalties of fine and amercement besides the recompence to the party first it must not be taken but by leave from the Kings Court unless in case of matters due by common right and upon complaint made by the Plaintiff The King sent out a Summons in this manner Henricus Rex Ang. Hominibus Abbatis de Ramsey salutem Precipio quod cito juste reddatis Abbati Domino vestro quicquid ei debetis in censu firma debitis placitis quod si nolueritis ipse vos inde constringat per pecuniam vestram And in all cases of matters due by common right the distress never was done in an arbitrary way but by Judicial Act in the Lord's Court. Secondly no distress for suit shall be made out of the Fee nor against any person but such as are of that Fee. Nor shall any distress be made in the King's High-way or open street but by the King's Officer and special Writ because distress is incident to service and that is due as from the Fee and therefore by common right the same must be recovered from the Fee and such as owe service in the same but the High-way or open street are more properly a Franchise belonging to the King although the Soil haply may be the Lords And therefore it was an old Law that they should be under the King's safeguard Sit pax publica per communes vias and no violence must be there tolerated but by the King 's special Writ which presupposeth the especial notice taken by the King of the nature of the occasion A moderation also must be observed in the taking of the distress for it must not be excessive and also in keeping thereof for if the owner will he may replevy the same according to the ancient course and the Sheriff must grant replevy if it be demanded although formerly no replevy was without special Writ and yet that also not always readily obeyed for the times were such as the Lords were bold with the King's Courts and Ministers and refused the order of the Law. Now in such cases wherein the matter concerned contempt of the King's Authority a Fine was set upon the Offender but in case it concerned onely a Tort done to the party he was amerced The one is called Redemption because the penalty otherwise must lie upon the person if it be not redeemed by pecuniary Fine the other is called Amercement which is originally a satisfaction unto the party wronged by recompence out of the personal Estate of the Delinquent Thirdly as touching the matter of the distress it must not be of Plough beasts or Sheep unless in case of damage fesant if other distress may be had for the Law had a care of such Cattel as were most of publick concernment and which was the main stock of subsistence so far as Justice would allow And therefore the unjust taking of any man's Cattel by any person whatsoever is liable to the same penalties that unjust distresses are Fourthly concerning the using of the distress it must not be sold no not in the King's case till fifteen days be past after it is taken nor must it be carried out of the County but it must be so impounded as the owner may come to feed it and it must be discharged if the owner give security of satisfaction before the return of the Writ Fifthly the intent of the distresses must be that which is just and therefore not for other suit than by the Feoffment is due or else by Prescription and in case many are joyntly seized the suit shall be by one and the rest shall contribute Nor must any man be compelled to shew his Title to his Land by distress The Common-pleas shall be holden in one certain place The Office of Judge of the Common-pleas was in my opinion distinct and several from that of the Crown-pleas nor though one and the same man might execute both Authorities doth it therefore follow that it was by one and the same power as if being Judge he had thereby power in all matters of the Common-pleas and also of the Crown For though it be true that Bracton saith The King hath one proper Court wherein are the Chief Judges which both by his own Testimony and Briton's also did hear and determine Causes of all sorts yet is it true also that it was by Appeal or Writ of Errour as in case of false Judgment and that the King had plures curias which doubtless had their proper work And in the time of Henry the second it is clear that six were especially assigned for the Common-pleas throughout the whole Realm and yet by another especial Commission or Letters-Patents the same men might also have power to determine matters of the Crown as at this day in their several Circuits This Law therefore doth not as I conceive work any alteration but onely in this that whereas formerly the Judges of Common-pleas attended on the King's Court continually as all other Judges did and whither the King removed they did the like which was a great uncertainty and grievance unto the Commons henceforth they are fixed to a certain place Assize of Novel Disseisin and Mortdancester shall be determined in the proper County onely and by the Justices itinerant sent by the King or his Chief Justices The Law was so declared in Henry the second 's
legem apparentem se purgare nisi prius convictus fuerit vel confessus in curia and therefore no man ought to be urged upon such difficulties unless by the express Law of the Land. The old way of Trial was first to bring in a Complaint and Witnesses ready to maintain the same and therefore both Appeals and Actions then used to conclude their pleas with the names of Witnesses subjoyned which at this day is implied in those general words in their conclusions Et inde producit sectam suam that is he brings his sect or suit or such as do follow or affirm his complaint as another part also is implied in those words Et hoc paratus est verificare For if the Plaintiffs sect or suit of Witnesses did not fully prove the matter in fact the Defendant's Averment was made good by his own Oath and the Oaths of Twelve men and so the Trial was concluded No Free-man shall be imprisoned or disseised of his Freehold or Liberties outlawed or banished or invaded but by the Law of the Land and judgement of his Peers Nor shall Justice be sold delayed or denied This is a comprehensive Law and made up of many Saxon Laws or rather an enforcement of all Laws and a remedy against oppression past present and to come And concerneth first the person then his livelihood as touching the person his life and his liberty his life shall be under the protection of the Law and his liberty likewise so as he shall be shut into no place by Imprisonment nor out of any place by Banishment but shall have liberty of ingress and egress His Estate both real and personal shall also be under the protection of the Law and the Law also shall be free neither denied nor delayed I think it needless to shew how this was no new Law but a confirmation of the old and reparation added thereto being much impaired by stormy times for the sum of all the foregoing discourse tendeth thereto Merchants shall have free and safe passage and trade without unjust Taxes as by ancient custome they ought In time of War such as are of the Enemies Countries shall be secured till it appear how the English Merchants are used in their Countries That this was an ancient Law the words thereof shew besides what may be observed out of the Laws of Aetheldred and other Saxon Laws So as it appeareth that not onely the English Free-men and Natives had their liberties asserted by the Law but also Forreiners if Merchants had the like liberties for their persons and goods concerning Trade and maintenance of the same and were hereby enabled to enjoy their own under the protection of the Law as the Free-men had And unto this Law the Charter of King John added this ensuing It shall be lawful for every Freeman to pass freely to and from this Kingdom saving Fealty to the King unless in time of War and then also for a short space as may be for the common good excepting Prisoners Outlaws and those Country-men that are in enmity and Merchants who shall be dealt with as aforesaid And it seemeth that this Law of free passage out of the Kingdom was not anciently fundamental but onely grounded upon reason of State although the Freemen have liberty of free passage within the Kingdom according to that original Law Sit pax publica per communes vias and for that cause as I suppose it was wholly omitted in the Charter of Henry the Third as was also another Law concerning the Jews which because it left an influence behind it after the Jews were extinct in this Nation and which continueth even unto this day I shall insert it in this short sum After death of the Jew's debtor no usury shall be paid during the minority of the Heir though the debt shall come into the King's hand And the debt shall be paid saving to the Wife her Dower and maintenance for the Children according to the quantity of the Debtors Land and saving the Lord's service and in like manner of debts to others The whole doctrine of Vsury fell under the Title of Jews for it seemeth it was their Trade and their proper Trade hitherto It was first that I met with forbidden at a Legatine Council nigh 300 years before the Normans times but by the Confessor's Law it was made penal to Christians to the forfeiture of Estate and Banishment and therefore the Jews and all their substance were holden to be in nature of the King Villains as touching their Estate for they could get nothing but was at his mercy And Kings did suffer them to continue this Trade for their own benefit yet they did regulate it as touching Infants as by this Law of King John and the Statute at Merton doth appear But Henry the Third did not put it into his Charter as I think because it was no liberty of the Subjects but rather a prejudice thereto and therefore Edward the First wholly took it away by a Statute made in his time and thereby abolished the Jews Tenants Lands holden of Lands escheated to the King shall hold by the same services as formerly In all alienations of Lands sufficient shall be left for the Lords distress Submitting to the judgement of the learned I conceive that as well in the Saxon times as until this Law any Tenant might alien onely part of his Lands and reserve the services to the alienor because he could not reserve service upon such alienation unto the Lord Paramount other than was formerly due to him without the Lord's consent and for the same reason could they not alien the whole Tenancy to bind the Lord without his express license saving the opinion in the book of Assizes because no Tenant could be enforced upon any Lord lest he might be his Enemy Nevertheless it seemeth that de facto Tenants did usually alien their whole Tenancy and although they could not thereby bar the Lord's right yet because the Lord could not in such cases have the distress of his own Tenant this Law saved so much from alienation as might serve for security of the Lord's distress But Tenants were not thus satisfied the Lords would not part with their Tenants although the Tenants necessity was never so urgent upon them to sell their Lands and therefore at length they prevailed by the Statute of Quia emptores to have power to sell all saving to the Lords their services formerly due and thus the Lords were necessitated to grant Licenses of alienation to such as the Tenants could provide to buy their Lands Nor was this so prejudicial to the Lords in those days when the publick quiet was setled as it would have been in former times of War whenas the Lord's right was maintained more by might and the aid of his Tenants than by Law which then was of little power The 35th Chapter I have formerly mentioned in the Chapter concerning
are to be ordered by Tutors than Children and therefore this may be annexed to the rest of the Liberties as well as the other Nevertheless it seemeth that the Laws took them into their regard in respect of their Estates which might be abused to the prejudice of the Publick rather than out of any respect had to their persons Now because there is a difference between the disability of these persons the one being perpetual the other temporary therefore is there also by these Laws a difference in the disposal of their Estates for the Tutor had a right in the disposing of the one and but a bare authority or power in providing for the other Secondly the person of the Tutor is to be considered Anciently it was the next kindred grounded as I conceive upon the natural affection going along with the blood and this so continued in custom until these times for though the Mirrour of Justice saith that Henry the First brought in that course of giving the custody of these disabled persons to the King as hath been formerly observed yet Bracton that wrote long after the time of Henry the First speaking of these kind of persons saith Talibus de necessitate dandus est tutor vel curator not so much as mentioning the King in the case And in another place speaking of such as are alieni juris saith that some are under the custody of their Lords and others under their Parents and friends But let the time of the entrance of this Law be never so uncertain it is now a declared Law that the King in such cases is the common Curator or Tutor of all such persons as he is a Chief Justice rendring to every one his right The King shall have the Wrecks of the Sea. What shall be called a Wreck the Statute at West 1. declareth viz. Where the Ship so perisheth that nothing therein escapeth alive and these are rather in their original committed to the King as a Curator than given him as a Proprietor although that Custom hath since setled a kind of right which may perhaps be accounted rather a Title by Estoppel For the fundamental ground is that the right owner cannot be manifested and therefore the King shall hold it and if the right owner can be manifested the King shall hold it till the owner doth appear The Heir in Socage-tenure shall have an Action of Waste and an account against his Guardian for the profits of the Lands and Marriage The Heir in Socage being under age shall also be under custody of such Guardian of the next kinred who cannot challenge right of Inheritance in such Lands so holden as if the Lands descended from the Father's side the Mother or next of the kinred of the Mothers side shall have the custody and so if the Lands descend from the Mother the Father or next kinred of the Father's side shall have the custody And this custody bringeth with it an Authority or Power onely and no Right as in case of the Heir in Knight-service and therefore cannot be granted over as the Wardship in Knight-service might but the Guardian in Socage remaineth accomptant to the Heir for all profits both of Land and Marriage The full age of Tenant in Socage is such age wherein he is able to do that service which is Fourteen years for at such age he may be able by common repute to aid in Tillage of the ground which is his proper service But the Son of a Burgess hath no set time of full Age but at such time as he can tell Money and measure Cloath and such work as concerns that calling Widows deforced of their Dower of Quarentine shall by Action recover damages till they recover their Dower They shall also have power to devise their crop arising from her Dower It was used that the Heir should have the crop with the Land but this Statute altered that former usage and yet saved the Lord's liberty to distrain if any services were due Writs de consimili casu granted in cases that fall under the same Law and need the same remedy and such Writs shall be made by agreement of the Clerks in the Chancery and advice of such as are skilful in the Law. It was none of the meanest Liberties of the Freemen of England that no Writs did issue forth against them but such as were anciently in use and agreed upon in Parliament And it was no less a grievance and just cause of complaint that Kings used to send Writs of new impression to execute the dictates of their own wills and not of the Laws of the Kingdom as the complaints of the Clergy in the times of Henry the Third do witness Nevertheless because many mens cases befel not directly within the Letter of any Law for remedy and yet were very burthensome for want of remedy it is provided by this Law that such emergent cases that do fall within the inconvenience shall be comprehended within the remedy of that Law. Aid to make the Son of the Lord a Knight and to marry his eldest Daughter shall be assessed after the rate of twenty shillings for a Knights Fee and twenty shillings for twenty pounds in yearly value of Socage-tenure The uncertainties of Aids are by this Law reduced and setled as touching the sum and thereby delivered the people from much oppression which they suffered formerly Nor was onely the particular sum hereby but also the age of the Son when he was to be made a Knight viz. at the age of Fifteen years too soon for him to perform Knight-service but not too soon for the Lord to get his money And the Daughter likewise was allowed to be fit for Marriage at Seven years of age or at least to give her consent thereto albeit that in truth she was neither fit for the one or other and therefore it must be the Lords gain that made the Law and it was not amiss to have the aid beforehand though the marriage succeeded not for many years after and if the Lord died in the interim the Executors having Assets paid it or otherwise his Heir CHAP. LXVIII Of Courts and their Proceedings BEsides the Courts of Justices itinerant which were ancient as hath been said other Courts have been raised of later birth albeit even they also have been of ancient constitutions and divers of them itinerant also and some of them setled in one place The work of the Justices itinerant was universal comprehending both the matters of the Crown and Common-pleas That of Oyer and Terminer is onely of Crown-pleas originally commenced and enquired of by themselves and granted forth upon emergent crimes of important consequence that require speedy regard and reformation Justices of Gaol-delivery have a more large work that is to deliver the Gaols of all criminal offenders formerly indicted or before themselves Justices of Assize and Nisi prius are to have cognizance of Common-pleas onely and
espyed the danger and how necessary it was for the people to be well armed in these times of general broil and upon that ground allowed this Law to pass That all such as had Lands worth 20 l. yearly besides Reprizals should be ready not to be Knights nor under the favour of others is there any ancient precedent to warrant it but to find or to enter into the field with the Arms of a Knight or to provide some able person to serve in their stead unless they were under 21 years of age and so not grown up to full strength of body nor their Lands in their own possession but in custody of their Lords or Guardians Nevertheless of such as were grown to full age yet were maimed impotent or of mean estate and Tenants by service of a Knight it was had into a way of moderation and ordered that such should pay a reasonable fine for respit of such service nor further as concerning 〈◊〉 persons were they bound But as touching such that were under present onely and not perpetual disabilities of body upon them incumbent as often as occasion called they served by their deputies or servants all which was grounded not onely upon the Law of Henry the Second but also upon common right of Tenure The Arms that these men were to finde are said to be those belonging to a Knight which were partly for defence and partly for offence Of the first sort were the Shield the Helmet the Hauberk or Breast-plate or Coat of Mail of the second sort were the Sword and Lance and unto all a Horse must be provided These Arms especially the defensive have been formerly under alteration for the Breast-plate could not be worn with the Coat of Mail and therefore must be used as occasion was provided of either and for this cause the service of a Knight is called by several names sometimes from the Horse sometimes from the Lance sometimes from the Helmet and not seldom from the Coat of Mail. The power of immediate command or calling forth the Knights to their service in its own nature was but ministerial and subservient to that power that ordered War to be levied and therefore as in the first Saxon Government under their Princes in Germany so after under their Kings War was never resolved upon but if it were defensive it was by the Council of Lords if offensive by the general Vote of the Grand Council of the Kingdom So by vertue of such Order either from the Council of Lords or Grand Council the Knights were called forth to War and others as the case required summoned to a rendezvouze and this instrumental power regularly rested in the Lords to whom such service was due and the Lords were summoned by the Lord Paramount as chief of the Fee of which their Tenants were holden and not as King or chief Captain in the Field for they were not raised by Proclamation but by Summons 〈◊〉 forth to the Sheriff with distress and this onely against such as were within his own Fee and held of the Crown The King therefore might have many Knights at his command but the Lords more and if those Lords failed in their due correspondency with the King all those of the inferiour Orb were carried away after them so the King is left to shift for himself as well as he can And this might be occasioned not onely from their Tenures by which they stood obliged to the inferiour Lords but probably much more by their popularity which was more prevalent by how much Kings looked upon the Commons at a further distance in those days than in after-times when the Commons interposed intentively in the publick Government And thus the Horse-men of England becoming less constant in adhering to their Soveraign in the Field occasioned Kings to betake themselves to their Foot and to form the strength of their Battels wholly in them and themselves on foot to engage with them One point of liberty these Souldiers by Tenure had which made their service not altogether servile and that was that their service in the Field was neither indefinite nor infinite but circumscribed by place time and end The time of their service for the continuance of it was for a set time if it were at their own charges and although some had a shorter time yet the general sort were restained to forty days For the Courage of those times consisted not in wearying and wasting the Souldier in the Field by delays and long work in wheeling about and retiring but in playing their prizes like two Combatants of resolution to get Victory by Valour or to die If upon extraordinary occasions the War continued longer then the Tenant served upon the pay of the common Purse The end of the service of the Tenant viz. their Lord's defence in the defence of the Kingdom stinted their work within certain bounds of place beyond which they were not to be drawn unless of their own accord And these were the borders of the Dominion of the Crown of England which in those days extended into Scotland on the North and into a great part of France on the South And therefore the Earl-Marshal of England being by Edward the first commanded by vertue of his Tenure to attend in person upon the Standart under his Lieutenant that then was to be sent into Flanders which was no part of the Dominion of England refused and notwithstanding the King's threats to hang him yet he persisted saying He would neither go nor hang. Not onely because the Tenants by Knight-service are bound to the defence of their Lord's persons and not of their Lieutenants but principally because they are to serve for the safety and defence of the Kingdom and therefore ought not to be drawn into foreign Countries Nor did the Earl-Marshal onely this but many others also both Knights and Knights fellows having twenty pounds per Annum for all these with their Arms were summoned to serve under the King's pay in Flanders I say multitudes of them refused to serve and afterwards joyned with the rest of the Commons in a Petition to the King and complained of that Summons as of a common Grievance because that neither they nor their Ancestors were bound to serve the King in that Country and they obtained the King's discharge under his broad Seal accordingly The like whereunto may be warranted out of the very words of the Statute of Mortmain which was made within the compass of these times by which it was provided That in case Lands be aliened contrary to that Statute and the immediate Lords do not seize the same 〈◊〉 King shall seize them and dispose them for the defence of the Kingdom viz. upon such services reserved as shall suit therewith as if all the service of a Knight must conduce thereto and that he is no further bound to any service of his Lord than will consist with the safety of the Kingdom This was the Doctrine that the
Sixth was in view and the minds of men left unassured neither trusting much to Edward the Fourth nor he to them And after that Henry the Sixth was gone out of the way Edward the Fourth could not readily change his posture used Arguments of force and power and for the most part looked like a man in Arms with his hand on his Sword ready to draw upon the next man that stands in his way Thus are the people partly driven and partly drawn into an Oath of Allegiance unto Edward the Fourth under peril of Attainder and the Parliament assured unto him once more For immediately upon the departure of Edward the Fourth beyond Sea after Ten years of his Reign the Parliament never staying for the issue of Providence declared the Throne void of Edward the Fourth and Henry the Sixth King. The Judges likewise of the Courts of Westminster determined the same thing as may appear by the Law-Reports of those times in Print wherein reattachments were often granted by them upon discontinuance of Process by this Demise of Edward the Fourth And thus Henry the Sixth is once more King for six Months viz. from October to April at which time the Ballance turns Edward the Fourth returns gets into the Throne Henry the Sixth is again Dethroned all things are as they were and all confirmed by Act of Parliament For that Body is ever wise enough to side with Power rather than to spend much time upon fruitless Orders and Votes that will pierce no Armour and therefore like the times must needs be subject to fits of distemper at the coming in of every Tide and did build and pull down enact and disenact turn and return the English Crown from York to Lancaster and back again and in conclusion for some time did do little but undo Nor can they be justly censured herein for Councils of men are not ordained to hinder divine Providence or over-rule Fate but to foresee and close with Occasions in the most advantageous way for the publick good and when both Winds and Currents are uncertain to ride at flote till they can discern the most commodious Haven to Winter in To impute therefore fault unto the Parliament in such Cases for want of Uniformity and Immutability of Councils is somewhat like the Notion that Batchelors conceit of Wives they would have but they do not know what other 〈◊〉 an Idea of their own fancy Now if it be enquired which course prevailed in order either to the Kings Royalty or the peoples Liberty I shall answer Neither of these but the House of York prevailed to hold the Crown and might have advanced the Authority thereof had they not fall'n out amongst themselves for the spoil and Edward the Fourth was not altogether disposed thereto The success that he had in the Field and his Souldiery made him look big like a King of the greater size but Kings sleep not securely upon such Pillows When the Militia is on Horseback it is as ready to be a Guard upon the King as for him and when it is most sober not so easily governed as a Commonwealth And therefore Edward the Fourth now in Arms though he found it a hard Notion to maintain the peoples Liberty where no man is free from the Souldier yet he enclined thereto We read of a multitude of Taxations of all sorts and of Benevolences the worst of all those sorts For Souldiers must have money or if not they will have it but the King would not force things so far as his power could reach he will have Money but it shall be by order of the Parliament He might have pretended much upon the Commission of Array yet did it not but chose rather to be Lord of the Seas And because it was too great a Farm for his private Purse he prays aid of the Parliament by the way of Tumage and Poundage which was in demand nine years before the Parliament granted it And when it was granted it was with such restrictions that it is evident the King preferred the right of the Parliament therein above his private honour Secondly Titles of Honour are but windy Notions and every one knows what claim is made by Kings to have the sole interest in conferring the same This Edward the Fourth neglected so far as he interested the Parliament both in the conferring of them and resuming the same Thirdly The course of Trade was now more especially looked to not by the King and Privy Council but by the Parliament And because it was much decayed partly by reason of the ill government thereof and partly by the excessive lavishness of these times many Laws are made for remedy of both And first the Staple was setled sometimes at Calis alone sometimes at it and Middleborough and by this means England gained Trade from both Nations but the principal thanks is to be given to the interest between the King and the House of Burgundy Then course is taken for the bringing of the Staple Commodities onely to those places and the return to be made in Money and not Commodity by exchange Then for the well making of Staple-Manufactures and restraining Importation of Foreign Manufactures of such kinds Then against transporting of English Coyn and importing of Foreign Coyn other than Bullion And as touching the second grievance it seems gallantry or vanity of Apparel was a sore Disease of these times which were become times of Fashions and wherein the King led the way by his own example For he desired to be brave and that he might be more brave he passed Laws that the people should be less brave assessing a sort of Apparel for every degree and therein stooped so low as to define the fashions of their very shoes Fourthly The Parliament retained their ancient right of reducing the course of Judicature For whereas Sheriffs had hitherto holden their course of Trial of the moaner sort of Felonies and Trespasses and Offences determinable onely by Imprisonment or Fines and Amerciaments whereby mens Estates did lie under the continual pillage of these covetous and extorting Officers It was established by the Parliament that these men should have for the future only power of enquiry and to certifie at the next Sessions and there the Trial to be and Fines and Amerciaments to be set Taxed and Estreated unto the Exechequer and from thence to be levied and thereof the Sheriff give account This was a great security to the peoples Estates but gave them not a full remedy For though the Trial was now more fair yet these Officers were Judges of suspicion and had still power upon suspicion to imprison their persons and seize their Estates under colour to save them for the King in case Conviction followed For remedy hereof the Justices of the Peace have now power given them to Bail in Case of light suspicion and it is further declared that no mans Estate shall be first
and Kent are saved out of this Law by the Statute the first whereof saves the Land to the Heir from the Lord and the second saves the same to the Heirs Males or for want of such to the Heirs Females and to the Wife her moity until she be espoused to another man unless she shall forfeit the same by fornication during her Widow-hood And by the same Law also the King had all Escheats of the Tenants of Archbishops and Bishops during the vacancy as a perquisite But Escheats of Land and Tenement in Cities or Burroughs the King had them in jure coronae of whomsoever they were holden All Wears shall be destroyed but such as are by the Sea-coast The Lieutenant of the Tower of London as it seemed claimed a Lordship in the Thames and by vertue thereof had all the Wears to his own use as appeareth by a Charter made to the City of London recited in the second Institutes upon this Law and this was to the detriment of the Free-men especially of the City of London in regard that all Free-men were to have right of free passage through Rivers as well as through Highways and purprestures in either were equally noxious to the common liberty And therefore that which is set down under the example or instance of the Rivers of Thames and Medway contained all the Rivers in England albeit that other parts of the Kingdom had not the like present regard as the City of London had The Writ of precipe in capite shall not be granted of any Freehold whereby a man may be in danger of losing his Court thereby It seemeth that it was one of the oppressions in those times that if a Suit were commenced in the inferiour or Lords Court concerning a Freehold a Writ of precipe in capite might be had upon a Surmise that the Freehold was holden in capite which might prove an absolute destruction to the inferiour Court and was the spoil of the Demandants case and therefore I think the Charter of King John instead of the word Court hath the word Cause There shall be but one known Weight and Measure and one breadth of Cloaths throughout the Realm of England This Law of Weights and Measures was anciently established amongst the Saxons as formerly hath been shewed and continued in the Normans times and confirmed by Richard the first and King John. And as touching the measure of the breadth of Cloaths although it might seem to abridge the liberty of particular persons yet because it was prejudicial to the common Trade of the Kingdom it was setled in this manner to avoid deceit and to establish a known price of Cloaths And it seemeth that Wine was ordinarily made in England as well as Ale otherwise the Measures of Wine could not have been established by a Law in England if they had been altogether made in other Countries Inquisition of Life and Member shall be readily granted without Fees. This was a Law of latter original made to take away a Norman oppression for by the Saxon Law as hath been already noted No man was imprisoned for Crime not bailable beyond the next County-court or Sheriff's Torn but when those rural Courts began to lose their power and the Kings Courts to devour Tryals of that nature especially by the means of the Justices itinerant which were but rare and for divers years many times intermitted during all which time supposed Offenders must lie in Prison which was quite contrary to the liberty of the Free men amongst the Saxons This occasioned a new device to save the common liberty by special Writs sued out by the party imprisoned or under bail supposing himself circumvented by hatred and malice and by the same directed to the Sheriff and others an Inquisition was taken and Tryal made of the Offence whether he deserved loss of Life or Member and if it were found for the supposed Offender he was bailed till the next coming of the Justices and for this the Writ was called the Writ of inquisition of Life or Member and sometimes the Writ de odio atia But these Inquests were soon become degenerate and subject to much corruption and therefore as soon met with a countercheck from the Law Or first rather a regulation for it was ordained that the Inquest should be chosen upon Oath and that two of the Inquest at least should be Knights and those not interessed in the Cause But yet this could not rectifie the matter for it seemed so impossible to do Justice and shew Mercy this way that the Writ is at length taken away and men left to their lot till the coming of Justices itinerant But this could not be endured above seven years for though the King be a brave Souldier and prosperous yet the people overcome him and recover their Writs de odio atia again Lords shall have the Wardships of their Tenants Heirs although they hold also of the King in Petit Serjeanty Socage Burgage or Fee-farm Inferiour Lords had the same right of Wardships with the King for their Tenures in Knight-service although their Tenants did hold also of the King unless they held of him in Knight-service which was a service done by the Tenant's own person or by the person of his Esquire or other deputy in his stead But as touching such service as was wont to be done to him by render or serving him with Arms or other utensils this was no Knight-service though such utensils concerned War but was called Petit Serjeanty as in the Law-books doth appear Nevertheless Henry the Third had usurped Wardships in such cases also and the same amongst others occasioned the Barons Wars No Judge shall compel a Free-man to confess matter against himself upon Oath without complaint first made against him Nor shall receive any complaint without present proof This Law in the Original is set down in another kind of phrase in the first part thereof which is obscure by reason thereof in express words it is thus No Judge shall compel any man ad legem manifestam which implieth that the matter was otherwise obscure if the party that was complained of or suspected did not manifest the same by his own declaring of the truth or matter enquired after and therefore they used in such cases to put him to Oath and if he denied the matter or acquitted himself the Judge would sometimes discharge him or otherwise put him to his Compurgators and this was called lex manifesta or lex apparens And it was a trick first brought in by the Clergie and the Temporal Judges imitated them therein and this became a snare and sore burthen to the Subjects To avoid which they complain of this new kind of Trial and for remedy of this usurpation this Law reviveth and establisheth the onely and old way of Trial for Glanvil saith Ob infamiam non solet juxta legem terrae aliquis per
way is different from the common Road both in it's original and in the course of proceedings nor could it otherwise be considering the condition of the Nations and the people of the same interested in common Traffique The people thus interested as much differed from the other sort of Dry men if they may be so called as Sea from Land and are in nature but as March-men of several Nations that must concentre in some third way for the maintenance of Commerce for peace-sake and to the end that no Nation may be under any other Law than its own The condition of the Nations in the times when civilized Government began to settle amongst them was to be under the Roman Emperours who having setled one Law in the general grounds throughout all Nations made the Sea likewise to serve under one rule which should float up and down with it that men might know upon what terms they held their own wheresoever they went and upon what terms to part with it for their best advantage In its original therefore this Law may be called Imperial and likewise in the Process because it was directed in one way of Trial and by one Law which had its first birth from the Imperial power and probably it had not been for the common benefit of Europe to have been otherwise at other time or by other directories formed Nevertheless this became no Gem of Prerogative to the English Crown for if England did comply with forrein Natives for its own benefit it being an Island full of the Sea and in the common Road from the most parts of Europe that border upon the Sea and of delight in Merchandise it is but suitable to its self and it did so comply as it saved the main Stake by voluntary entertaining those Laws without being imposed upon by Imperial power For the Saxons came into this Kingdom a free people and so for ought yet appeareth to me continueth to this day I say that in those first times they did take into the consideration of Parliament the regulating of the fluctuating motions of Sea-laws nor were they then or after properly imposed by the King's Edict For though it were granted that Richard the First reduced the Sea-Laws in the Isle of Oleron yet that the same should be done without advice of Parliament in his return from the Holy land is to me a Riddle considering what Histories do hold forth concerning his return through Germany nor can that be good evidence to entitle Kings of England to a power to make and alter Laws according to their private pleasure and interest Nor doth that Record mentioned in the Institutes warrant any such matter but rather on the contrary groundeth the complaint upon Laws Statutes Franchises and Customs established and that this Establishment was by the King and the Council This Law was of a double nature according to the Law of the Land one part concerning the pleas of the Crown and the other between party and party for properly the King's Authority in the Admiralty is but an Authority of Judicature according to Laws established which both for process and sentence are different from the Common-Law as much as the two Elements do differ yet not different in the power that made them I shall leave the particulars to be enquired into by them that shall mind it elsewhere and only touch so much as shall reflect upon the main Government This power was executed by Deputies diversly according as the times and opportunities were for War or Peace and either transitu or portu What was done in time of War or whilst the Ship is out of the English Seas comes not to our purpose and therefore I shall not meddle with that further than this that in the first times Kings were wont to divide the work of Judicature and of War into several hands The power of War and Peace they committed unto men of approved Courage and Skill in that service and therefore generally not to the men of highest rank who had neither Mind nor Skill for a work of such labour dyet and danger This power passed under divers names sometimes by grant of the custody of the Sea-coasts sometimes of the parts and Sea coasts sometimes by being made Captain of the Sea-men and Mariners and sometimes Admiral of the Ships It was a great power and had been much greater but that it suffered a double diminution the one in the time for three or four years commonly made an end of the command of one man and at the best it was quam diu Regi placuerit the other diminution was in circuit of the power for all the Maritine Coasts were not ordinarily under the power of one man but of many each having his proper precinct upon the South or North East or Western shores and under the Title of Admiral in the times of Edward the First and forwards who brought that Title from the Holy Land. Nevertheless about the end of the times whereof we now Treat the custody of the whole Sea began to settle in one hand under the Title of Admiral of the English Seas and the place was conferred upon men of the greatest rank and so continued ever afterward The power of Jurisdiction or Judicature all this while remained distinct and it seems was setled in part in the power of the Sheriff and Justices For by the Law the Sheriff and Justices had cognizance of matters between the high water and the low water mark and what was done Super altum mare was within the directory of the Admiral these were but few things and of small consideration the principal of them being concerning War or Peace and those only within the English Seas But after Edward the Third had beaten both the French and Spaniards at Sea the people grew much more towards the Sea and became so famous that the greatest Lords thought the Regiment of Sea-affairs worthy of the best of their Rank and were pleased with the Title of Admiral whilst they left the work to others and so the Admiral became a person of more honour and less work than he had been formerly The greatness of the honour of this place thus growing soon also began to contract greatness of power beyond what it had formerly and this was principally in matter of Jurisdiction For not contented with the power of a chief Justice of War and Peace within the Seas which was his proper dominion the Lord Admiral gained the same within the low water mark and in the main streams below the next Bridge to the Sea and in all places where Ridels were set and yet these places were within the body of the County Nor did he endeavour less to gain in matters of distributive Justice for although he had a legal Jurisdiction in things done upon the Sea so far as to defend order determine and cause restitution to be made in cases of damage done unjustly yet was it no less difficult to keep
this power within its own bounds than the watry Element upon which it sloated but it made continual waves upon the Franchise of the Land and for this cause no sooner had these great men savoured of the Honour and Authority of that Dignity but comes a Statute to restrain their Authority in the Cognizance of Cases only unto such matters as are done upon the main Sea as formerly was wont to be And within two years after that Act of Parliament is backed by another Act to the same purpose in more full expressions saving that for Man-slaughter the Admirals power extended even to the high water-mark and into the main streams And this leadeth on the next consideration viz. What is the subject matter of this Jurisdiction and Authority I shall not enter into the depth of particulars but shall reduce all to the two heads of Peace and Justice The Lord Admiral is as I formerly said a Justice of Peace at Sea maintaining the Peace by power and restoring the Peace by setting an Order unto matters of Difference as well between Foraigners as between the English and Foraigners as may appear by that Plea in the fourth Institutes formerly mentioned Secondly That point of Justice principally concerneth matters of Contract and Complaints for breach of Contract of these the Admiral is the Judge to determine according to Law and Custom Now as subservient unto both these he hath Authority of command over Sea-men and Ships that belong to the State and over all Sea-men and Ships in order to the service of the State to arrest and order them for the great voyages of the King and Realm and during the said voyage but this he cannot do without express Order because the determining of a voyage Royal is not wholly in his power Lastly the Lord Admiral hath power not only over the Sea-men serving in the Ships of State but over all other Sea-men to arrest them for the service of the State and if any of them run away without leave from the Admiral or power deputed from him he hath power by enquiry to make a Record thereof and certifie the same to the Sheriffs Mayors Bailiffs c. who shall cause them to be apprehended and imprisoned By all which and divers other Laws not only the power of the Admiral is declared but the original from whence it is derived namely from the Legislative power of the Parliament and not from the single person of the King or any other Council whatsoever But enough hath been already said of these Courts of State in their particular precincts One general interest befalls them all That as they are led by a Law much different from the Courts of Common-Law so are they thereby the more endeared to Kings as being subservient to their Prerogative no less than the Common-Law is to the peoples liberty In which condition being looked upon as Corrivals this principal Maxime of Government will thence arise That the bounds of these several Laws are so to be regarded that not the least gap of intrenchment be laid open each to other lest the Fence once broken Prerogative or Liberty should become boundless and bring in Confusion instead of Law. CHAP. VI. Of the Church-mens Interest BUt the Church-mens interest was yet more Tart standing in need of no less allay than that of the King's Authority for that the King is no less concerned therein than the people and the rather because it was now grown to that pitch that it is become the Darling of Kings and continually henceforth courted by them either to gain them from the Papal Jurisdiction to be more engaged to the Crown or by their means to gain the Papal Jurisdiction to be more favourable and complying with the Prerogative Royal. The former times were tumultuous and the Pope is gained to joyn with the Crown to keep the people under though by that means what the Crown saved to it self from the people it lost to Rome Henceforth the course of Affairs grew more civil or if you will graced with a blush of Religion and it was the policy of these times whereof we now treat to carry a benign Aspect to the Pope so far only as to slave him off from being an enemy whilst Kings drove on a new design to ingratiate and engage the Church men of their own Nation unto it's own Crown This they did by distinguishing the Office or Dignity of Episcopacy into the Ministerial and Honourable Parts the later they called Prelacy and was superadded for encouragement of the former and to make their work more acceptaple to men for their Hospitalities sake for the maintenance whereof they had large Endowments and Advancements And then they reduced them to a right understanding of their Original which they say is neither Jus Divinum nor Romanum but that their Lordships power and great possessions were given them by the Kings and others of this Realm And that by vertue thereof the Patronage and custody of the Possessions in the vacancy ought to belong to the Kings and other the Founders and that unto them the right of Election into such advancements doth belong not unto the Pope nor could he gain other Title unto such power but by usurpation and encroachment upon the right of others But these great men were not to be won by Syllogisms Ordinarily they are begotten between Ambition and Covetousness nourished by Riches and Honour and like the Needle in the Compass turn ever after that way Edward the Third therefore labours to win these men heaped Honour and Priviledges upon them that they might see the gleanings of the Crown of England to be better than the vintage of the Tripple Crown Doubtless he was a Prince that knew how to set a full value upon Church men especially such as were devout and it may be did somewhat outreach in that course For though he saw God in outward events more than any of his Predecessors and disclaiming all humane merits reflected much upon God's mercy even in smaller blessings yet we find his Letters reflect very much upon the Prayers of his Clergy he loved to have their Persons nigh unto him put them into places of greatest Trust for Honour and Power in Judicature and not altogether without cause he had thereby purchased unto his Kingdom the name and repute of being a Kingdom of Priests But all this is but Personal and may give some liking to the present Incumbents but not to the expectants and therefore the Royal Favour extended so far in these times as to bring on the Parliament to give countenance to the Courts and Judiciary power of the Ordinaries by the positive Law of the Kingdom although formerly the Canons had already long since made way thereto by practice I shall hereof note these few particulars ensuing Ordinaries shall not be questioned in the King's Court for Commutation Testamentary Matters or Matrimonial Causes nor other things touching Jurisdiction of Holy-Church Things
seized till Conviction and Attainder first be had And because Escheators grew no less burthensome in their way it was therefore ordered that no man shall be allowed in such Office unless he hath Lands to the value of Twenty pounds per Annum and that he shall be responsible for such wrong done by himself or by his Deputy and Farmer Thus Edward the Fourth quitted himself like a King in many regards but soon ran himself out of breath gave his Lamp to his Son that was too weak to hold it a Third snatches it away and for two years carrying it exceeding well yielded up all encroached Royalty to the people and his Crown and Life to his Successor CHAP. XXV The condition of the Clergie IF any gains were had in these uncertain times the Church-men might seem to have them having now this advantage that the Commonalty was distracted with uncertain interests of the Succession of the Crown And themselves onely united under the Popedom now freed from all Schism and the Popedom managed by Sixtus the Fourth who had the hap to be accounted more virtuous than any of his Predecessors had been and to have all the Christian Princes wholly at his devotion And lastly Both the Clergie and the Kings were now joyntly engaged against the rising power of Religion then called Heresie in order whereunto the Clergie leading the way had the applause of them that followed upon an implicite Faith that whatsoever was done was exceeding well done Nor was it wisdom for Kings that sate loose in their Thrones to stumble the good Opinions of so considerable a party towards them And therefore Edward the Fourth in his first entrance granted to the Clergie that which could never be by them obtained from any of the foregoing Kings Viz. Free liberty of Process in all Cases Ecclesiastical and in Tythes of Wood above twenty years growth and in case they were troubled upon the Statutes of Provisors they should have their remedy in the Chancery against those Judges and their Proceedings in such Cases there to be cancelled This was done by Charter and was sufficient to shew what the desire of the Clergie and the intention of the King was Viz. At once to favour the Church and under colour of favour done to the Clergie to cancel both Common and Statute-Laws of the Kingdom by the power of the Chancellor's Decree Nevertheless all this was but the King's breath the policy changed never a whit the more For the Common Law held on its course not onely in Cases depending before the Holy Chair but also even before the Bishop of the Diocess at home so as neither the King was concluded from his Suit nor the party endamaged from his Action by any such Charter And so far were the Judges of the Common Law from being bound by the Chancery in such Cases that they professed they would not delay to grant the Habeas Corpus to deliver any Prisoner by Decree of the Chancellour in any Case triable at the Common Law. Much less did the Parliament favour these men so far as to give them any countenance in any way of gain upon themselves but rather made bold with what the Church-men in former times challenged as their own and upon this account whereas formerly it had inhibited Fairs and Markets upon the Lord's Day Now it inhibited the sale of Boots Shoes c. upon that day though done never so privately which they did at the first onely within the City of London and three miles thereof I suppose it was made onely by way of Trial it being dangerous in such times to give a stop to all England at once otherwise it might be wondered why God's Honour should be better regarded in London than in all the Realm besides Of this encroachment we find no complaint made by the Church-men another touched them to the quick although it befel onely the Arch-bishoprick of York that hitherto held ordinary Jurisdiction over all the Bishops of Scotland as being their Provincial Now it is disclaimed by them all and they are backed therein by their King under pretence of great inconvenience to his Bishops in their so far Travels but in truth not unlike to Jeroboam though he pretended it was too much for them yet he thought it unsafe for himself that his Bishops should owe Canonical obedience to the Subject of another Prince and upon this ground prevailed with Pope Sixtus the Fourth to make the Divorce and left it to future Ages to try the validity thereof if they would This is all that I shall observe of the Government of these three Kings whose Reigns in the whole exceeded not Twenty six years and their compleat power therein not much above half so many CHAP. XXVI A short sum of the Reigns of Henry the Seventh and Henry the Eighth THe course of English policie hitherto wandring in the different Currents springing from the double head of Monarchie and Democracie and in them likewise often tossed up and down partly by the blasts of windy Titles and pretensions and partly by the raging Tides from the Roman See now begin to come to anchor within view of Shore Happy England if the same prove good Harbourage for a fainting Nation Two Kings now undertake the Steerage the work of the first was to still the Winds the other the Seas and so to bring the Adventure safe home Henry the Seventh hapned upon a good preparative for this work in that he delivered the Kingdom from a Tyrant whose irregular and bloody way was so odious to the people that it set a foil upon his Successor's Government and made his Wisdom Valour and Justice appear greater than possibly it was His Valour made way for the other two he had enough thereof to serve a wise man in case of extremity at other times he made more use of his Majesty than Manhood being confident that the people knew not where to mend themselves but would be at his Devotion so long as he was better than his Predecessor though he cared not how little His Wisdom was his greatest part of which upon all occasions he made the greatest improvement he could without reflecting upon Conscience or Religion whereof he had tasted no more than would render him a civil man whereunto his Education did lead the way Thus though his Valour brought him to the Crown yet it was his Wisdom that setled him in the Throne For though he loved himself so well that he was loth to pretend allowance of any access of Foreign help to his own atchievement in his Title or that he was guilty in the least manner in his entry upon the Throne yet to keep danger far off he provided one guard for his Person and many for his Title That of his Person he onely pretended as a ceremony of State brought from the French Court and yet it is strange that it went so well down with a Free people For