eldest dye having issue a sonne though this issue be heire to B the other sonne after the death of Alice shall have the land as néerest of blood and by Greene and Seaton if there had béene severall issues of divers sonnes and daughters to the devisor when the remainder vested it should have gone to them all But here because the daughter of him had issue a daughter when the tenant for life died and there was not issue of any sonne at the instant to take from her or with her this Daughters Daughter shall have all and though there came an after borne sonne of any of the brethren she may detaine all c. for a remainder vested is not like to fée simple discended to a daughter where a sonne Posthumus may enter And if lands be letten for life the remainder to the right heires of I. if I. dye having issue a son which entereth after the death of the tenaÌ„t for life then dieth his son shal have nothing because he was not capax at the fal of the remainder likewise where there is a brother sister lands are let for life to an estranger the remainder to the right heires of the brother if he and the tenant for life die the sister may enter and retaine the possession and fée though the brothers wife bee afterward delivered of a sonne in like sort did the remainder rest in the child of Maâ—d in Eliz. viz. which recovered by award 30. Assi p. 47. But where there is father and sonne which sonne purchaseth and dieth without issue and an uncle entereth if two yeares after the father hath a sonne by the mother of the purchasor this sonne may enter and put out the uncle and the reason of Law is that hée that comes in by purchase must be capax at the time when the purchase vest in him but in case of discent it is not so requisite Perk. in his Chapter of devises saith that if a devise bée made to a colledge which is not a colledge at the time of the devise it is a void devise although afterward it be made a colledge upon the same reason is Dier 13 Eliz. 303. of a devise to an infant in ventre sa mere And where a man dieth seised and his daughter entereth c. a son borne afterward may enter but it is not so in case of purchase c. for if a woman consent to a ravishor her daughter and heire enter by the statute 6. R. 2. ca. 6. the son Posthumus shall not put her out no more shall he where a daughter and heire entereth for condition broken and where a daughter hath a villain by discent which purchaseth she entereth into the perquisits an after borne sonne her brother shall have that which discended viz. the villien but not the land these cases hath Brook Discents 58. out of the Doct. and Student 5. Ed. 4. fo 58. in the case of Elizabeth Venor agreeth concerning entry made by 6. Ri. 2. And so doth Hales and Mountague in the case of Wimbish and Talbois yet Mountague Chiefe Iustice taketh there a learned difference if a man devise land for life the remainder to the right heire male of the devisor the heires of his body c. now if the devisée for life die and a woman which is heire generall to the devisor entereth and hath afterward a sonne the sonne shall never out the mother in whom is vested the inheritance for want of other persons to take the falling remainder per le melior opinion 9. H. 6 yet he saith the cases of ravishment possession of a brother abatement of a bastard c are all to bee understood of fée simple for where the entry gaineth but estate taile one may beate the bush and another take the bird so if a man seised by discent from his mother make a feofment with condition c. and die without issue if a woman heire on the father side enter for condition broken an heire male or female on the mothers side may oust her Plow c. fo 56. a. b. 57. a. West 1. ca. 22. THen West goeth on with heire females that so soone as they come to the age of fourtéene yeares if the Lord for covetousnes will not marry them yet he shall not kéepe their land above two yeares after they have accomplished 14 within which two yeares if they be not married by their Lord they may take action against him for their inheritance to recover it without paying any thing for the custody or for marriage If so be that of their proper malice or through the mischievous counsell of others such women refuse convenable marriage offered by their Lord he may in this case retaine their land untill they be of 21. yeares and longer untill he shall receive the value of their marriage Littletons words upon this statute in his 2. booke cap. 4. BY Littleton if tennant by service of Chivalry die his here female being 14. yeares old or more the Lord shall have custody neither of the land nor body for at that age a woman may have a husband able to doe knights service but if such an heire be under 14. and unmaried at the time of her auncestors death the Lord shall have ward in her land untill she be of 16. yeares age West 1. cap. 22. which getteth the Lord 2. yeares to tender marriage without disparagement and if during these two yeares the Lord tender no such marriage shee may enter and oust the Lord. If such an heire female be married under the age of 14. in the life of her ancestor which ancestor dieth before she accomplisheth 14. yeares the Lord shall have no more but the wardship of her land till shee be 14. yeares old and then her husband with her may enter into her land and put the Lord out for this is out of the Statute because the Lord may not tender marriage to her that is already married for before the Statute of West such an heire female that was under the age of 14. at the death of her ancestor and had atteined afterward to the age of 14. yeares without any tender of marriage by her Lord made unto her might well enter into her land and put out the Lord as appeareth by the rehearsall and very words of the Statute which as it séemeth so saith Littleton was made altogether for the advantage of the Lord. A suspition of Littletons error NOw saving Mr. Littletons inspiration I am greatly afraid that ye shal not finde by the text of the Statute That an heire female being under 14. at the death of her ancestor might by the common law before this Statute enter and oust her Lord as soone as she had accomplished 14. yeare of age without tender of marriage The law perhaps was so but this Statute proves it not Againe I doubt Littleton was deceived in taking this Statute to be all for the advantage of Lords yet it is
garde at the age of 14. yeares THe principall reason that mooved our law founders so soone to set women out of ward is none other then hath béene already declared she is quickly able domui preesse viro subesse and her husband for her shall doe Knights service or some other for him and in his stead the cases are therefore 26 H. 8. fo 2 If the Kings tenant in chiefe having feoffees to his use marry his daughter vnder age to a man of full age and dye this daughter being heire is out of ward for her body though not for her land for that shal be in ward in this case an the Kings possession must bee voided by suite and livery But had she béene of full age of 14. yeares at her fathers death no such thing had néeded neither should she have bin in ward nor the King have any primer seisin For that was not as yet seene into by the Statutes of H. 7. which had given ward reliefe and herriots upon the death of him which died intestate and seised of onely a bare use againe if the King have a woman ward which he marrieth before she be 14 she shal be be to all intents out of ward at 14. and may immediatly sue her livery 28. H. 8. for as a ward masculine married by his Lord vnder 21. shal be sui luris at 21. so shall a ward feminine being maried before 14. bee out of ward at 14. altogether In the old Natura brevium in the writ de electione custodiae it is said that where the tenant marieth his daughter being under age to a man of ful age dieth the daughter shal be out of ward But if he mary his daughter being of full age to a man under age and die she shall be in ward This Mr. Brooke taketh to be no law even so doe I his reason is that no Lord can have the marriage of her that is already married or compell any heire to be twice married For if a tenant marry his son and die and then the sonnes wife dieth holden the Lord shall not have his body in ward to marry him Which is cleare specially if the sonne were infra annos nubiles at the time of his fathers death But certainely if the Lord couple his ward to a wife which dieth the ward is at full liberty for his body and shall not be married by his Lord. The reason why an heire female of full age married by her father to a man under age should not be out of ward must be because the supposition of law faileth her husband is not able arma portare officiis fungi militaribus vel pro iisdem faciendis cum alio pacisci But this notwithstanding me thinketh a woman married should bee out of ward for all her husbands nonage thought the woman bee but twelve yeares old a boy knight shall be out of ward for his body shall a woman innupta matura viro be in kéeping of any but her husband shall shee at 14. yeares age bee ward because she hath a husband but 19. yeare olds who should not have béene in ward had she had no husband at al non videtur The husbands ability to doe souldiers service is neither the onely nor the principall cause in mine opinion why a woman is by law out of ward at 14. yeares age But law going with the trace or tide of nature that hath made women as Bracton saith fit to carry cey and key cloge betimes suffereth them to mary very early And it should be a mischievous inconvenient unjust and unnatural law that should hold a woman from her husband or from her inheritance which is without offence of law maried fully able to bring forth children because her husband is not fully fit for all mannor of horsemanship Be not therefore good woman absterred from a young husband by old natura brevium SECT XII How a woman that hath beene in ward shall come by her land A Woman past 14. yeares of age at her ancestors death shall not be in ward And where she is in ward till 16. she may have action at 16. against her Lord for her inheritance according to the Statute By Littleton she may enter which standeth with reason for the Statute giving action to her affirmatiuely doth not disaffirme the entrie which she might have had by the auncient catholicke Common law if shee cannot or dare not enter she may have alone if she be alone or with her fellowes if she be a coheire a writ of mortdancester as well against her Lord as against any other abator Marlbridg ca. 16. But if shee be ward to the King against whom a mortdancestor writ of Aile Besaile or Cosinage then it melts into petition and she must sue for livery And where the King hath a woman in ward with some lands holden of other Lords in socage such a ward shall not so soone as shee is 14. yeare old have livery of that socage lands but she must arry unlesse she be married in the meane while till she be 16. because livery must be at once parcell not by percels Yet if 3. copartners be in ward to the King she which first commeth to age shall sue her livery and have partition vpon it SECT XIII Of Parceners FOr it must not be omitted there where a man dieth seised of any manner of inheritance having issue none but daughters to whom such inheritance descendeth when they have entered by Litt. they are parceners one heire to their common ancestor so are the heires of females parceners and they ought to come in by descent for if by purchase they are jointenants they are called partners saith he because they are compellable by a writ de partitione facienda to divide the inheritance amongst them Like or the same law is where a man dying seised having no issue his land goeth to his sisters or aunts that are partners if one of them dye before partition made her part shall descend to her issue and for want of issue to her coheires which shal be déemed and adjudged in by discent and not by survivour SECT XIII Difference betweene partners and jointenants FOr although partners have a conjoyned estate yet law maketh a great diversity betwixt them and jointenants Partners by the cōmon law are onely females or the heirs of females which also must be in by descents for if sisters makeajoint purchase they are jointnants and not partners Betwixt whom observe here the germaine apparent difference If two coparceners be of lands in fee simple wherof one before partition made chargeth her part with a rent dieth without issue her coparcener taking as heire and by discent shall hold the land charged But it is otherwise betwixt jointenants Also partners may devise and give away their part by testament so cannot jointenants SECT XV. Difference betweene partners and tenants in common ANd as in the cases precedent parteners are like tenants in
of the Obligée And if I bee bound to C. that A. shall marry B. before Easter If I marry B. and our Espousals continue till Easter my bond is forfeited Similiter If C. marry B. or if A. and B. cannot marrie because one of them dieth or wareth mad before the day I finde none other cause in our Yéere-bookes alleaged why things may not passe by gift betwéene Baron and feme saue only vnitie of person But vndoubtedly the restraint springeth from a politique consideration rather to bréed cherish and maintaine the vnity then in iudging of an impossibility because of the vnitie But the Ciuill Law vir non potest dare vxori ne foeminae amorem coniugalcm in quaestu habeant prohibenter inter coniuges donationes quia silicerct coniugibus inuicem donare matrimonia fierint venalia saepe distraherentur c. And because it would amount to arguing inter coniuges there is a restraint by that law Ne priuignus dare queat nouercae vel nouerca priuigno What if the Matrimonie be inualidum legibus non consistens yet non valet inter coniuges putatiuos facta donatio ne melioris sint conditionis quam illi qui recte faciont But a gift to a plaine Concubine is good enough vnlesse the giuer be a Soldier By old Iohn Bracton lib. 2. ca 5. Non valent donationes inter virum vxorem non enim poterit vir dare vxori nec e conuerso constante Matrimonio quia huiusmodi donationes prohibitae sunt inter tales personas nec infraudem facere possint constitutioni veluti si Maritus donet extraneae personae ea mente vt redonet in vita viri vel post mortem hee maketh his reason in the 14. Chapter Si tales donationes fieri possint ob amorem inter virum foeminam posset alter eorum egestare inopia premi But at this day though lands cannot passe betwixt Baron and Feme right out by plaine liuery or bargaine yet in the obliquitie of fines recoueries and vses there is an Expedite transporting of Inheritance betwixt them to the vndoing perhaps of the partie whose Lands are transferred and auferred with not so much as coniugall loue alwayes in recompence SECT IIII. In what sort things may passe betwixt Baron and Feme LAnds cannot passe from the Baron by feoffement to put the state from him immediately to the wife though he were infeoffed to that intent and vpon such a condition But one man may infeoffe another vpon condition to infeoffe the wife of the Feoffor whatsoeuer Bracton say and the condition good Also a feoffement fine or recouery may be made knowledged or suffered to the vse of her and her heyres which is wife to the Feoffor Conusor or sufferer c. And as I may make another man the instrument to conuey lands to my wife so may I be the meanes to conuey Lands to my wife from another man for by Letters of Atturney-ship I may deliuer seisen of Lands to my Wife for another and the feoffement shall be good by Parkins 41. And a man may deuise in his last Will and Testament either by the custome or by the Statute 32. H. 8. Lands to his Wife in fée fée-taile for life or for yeares because this taketh none effect till the Couerture be dissolued It is said in Scolasticus case If I deuise that he shall haue greene acre after the death of my wife my wife shall haue estate for life by the intent c. And although a wife by the generall rule hath no will but her Husbands and all Testaments of a feme-couert to deuise any Mannors Lands Tenements and Hereditaments are ineffectuall by expresse declaration of 34. Henrici 8. capite 5. soeuer be the courtesie among Dames of honor a womans name of dignitie changeth with the degree of her husband and of such women as haue not their honor by birth but acquire that by Marriage the rule of Law taketh order Si mulier nobilis nupserit ignoblem desinet esse nobilis when she taketh a second husband But what though the scrupulositie of the Common pleas were obserued throughout the Realme that Esquires Ladies should be no Ladies in Court and Country wherevnto I will neuer giue voyce what inequality were in this depressing shall not likewise a Knights widdow marrying with a Baron or Earle as be much exalted verament yet you see the dignitie hangeth meerely on the male side carrying the scepter of Wedlocke SECT VI. Touching seruitude NOw touching the state of fréedome or bondage Littleton saith that if a free-man marry a bond-woman the Lord cannot seise her but there is remedie by action for taking her sans gree or licence Fitzherbert in his liberâ—are probanda agreeth 78. G. that she should be fréed perpetually But the Law seemeth to be otherwise And so you may find the opinion of Doct. Stud. fo 139 b. And that indeed it is no more but a Temporarie priuiledge and exemption from seisure of her Lord during time of couerture for if the Seigniour of a Mannor marrie his Niefe regardant the best authority that I can finde is that this Niefe is no more but shrined in the honour of her Lord if he die she shall haue no Dower but remaine still in her niefitie regardant to the Mannor And to say truth I perceiue not how a womans being married can in any sort be an infranchisement no not for a time it is no more but a sconsing or hiding of the seruitude Bracton saith elegantly manumission is a detection or laying open of the freedome which is a natura A womans liberty is free licence to doe what she list vnlesse shee be letted by force or by Law it is not restored to Niefe when she marrieth Marriage rather pulleth it from her which before was free When a Seignieur therefore marrieth with his bond-woman she must not turne her bumme to him and say heretofore my Lord I lay in your bed and now I lye in mine owne as the French Concubine said being married newly to her French Lord but let her bee burome and mindfull of her subiection for if this louing Seignior of hers die she may right well be an apparant Niefe againe to her owne sonne for ought that I know why not as well as causes may happen that the father to sonne or one sonne to another may be a villeine the case did happen 3. Ed. 3. that the villaine married his Lords mother and so the father in Law and the brother de demisank were villeines If a free woman marry a villeine her naturall freedome is not otherwise infringed then by subiection to her husband If the villeine purchase Lands and die before seisure made by the Lord the wife shall haue Dower But if a frée-woman seised in fee or fee-tails take a husband which is a villeine and die the Lord may enter vpon the husbands possession per le Courtesie or vpon the Issue being Tenants
another mans Seignory may Lease away their estate for a proud fine and a little rent Nay yée may be sure that if they might set the example they should be gotten to make Leases for esperuiers annuall and small yearely income in hope that my young Master at his full age should be content with the old rent and a kennell of 〈…〉 ds King Henries and the Parliaments meaning was not therefore that their Leases should be any patternes for reseruation of rent by Tenant in Taile or as I suppose in the right of his Wife If Baron and Feme make a Lease by Indenture for twenty yeares to commence at Michaelmas it might séeme doubtfull by the booke 7. 8. Eliz. Dyer 246. whether it be a good Lease by this Statute If Baron and Feme by their Indenture make a Lease to commence after the Wiues death I thinke this no good Lease according to the Statute for twenty one years ought to be from the making of the Lease c. If the Baron and Feme die the Heyre is not bound to accept the rent or allow the Lease And though he doe accept it if the Land were tailed he may enter notwithstanding vide 10. Eliz. Dyer 279. If Baron and Feme make a Lease by Indenture c. for 31. yeares quaere the Baron dying whether this be a good Lease for 21. yeares or no I thinke it is not but standeth méerely at Common Law For the first Prouiso of this act is that it shall not haue respect or extend to Leases made for aboue 21. yeares When King Henry the eight in 31. of his Reigne by Parliament had made voyd all Leases to bee made of Lands which should afterward come to him if any Leases former were in esse or being with prouiso viz if he which had an old vnexpired lease tooke a new that he should hold for 21. yeares from making of the new Lease so that it excéeded not twenty one yeares it was admitted in Falmestones Case that such a Lease made for fifty yeares was good for 21. Plo. 110. And when Thomas Vmpton after 32. Henry the 8. ca. 1. which gaue power to Tenant per Chiualrie to deuise two parts of his land had deuised a whole mannor in fée before 34. Ed. 3. 5. Hen. 8. of explanation which will by the said Statute of explanation was referred to the Law the deuice was adiudged good for two parts contra Kelwais opinion as you may sée 4. 5. Phil. Mar. Dyer 150. But these cases differ farre from the former as yee may finde by the comparing the Statutes If after a Demise by Baron and Feme for twenty shillings of vsuall rent the husband release all his right except twelue pence c. or grant that the Lessée shall hold dispunishable for waste the Wife accepting twelue-pence post mortem viri may distraine for the rest notwithstanding and haue an action of waste Dyer 304. Note before this Statute was made the Count Bridge water being tenant in taile the remainder to Basset in taile he bound himselfe in recognizance to the said Basset to make no alienation grant sale conueyance or exchange otherwise then for his owne life it was a question after the statute whereunto Basset and all men were parties whether the Earle might now make a lease for xxi yeares without forfeiture of his Recognizance resolved by Bromely Portman and Harris serjeants that he could not but if hee did make such a lease they thought that neither hee in remainder or the donour should euer auoid it by any dying sans issue 33 H. 8. f. 49. in Dyer who concludeth and so shall the statute be expounded for so was the intent a meaning of the makers yet the text hath no word of donours or of them in remainder I heare that law is taken now to bee cleane contrary in the last point viz that remainders and reuersions are freed from this act and I beleeue it the rather because 34. H 8. ca. 20. that frustrateth fained recoueries against tenant in tayle where the King is in reuersion or remainder in the prouision for strength of leases made according to the Statute is only against the Heyre or heyres of tenant in taile c. The last part of the Statute SECT XXVI THe Last part of the Statute is negatiue against 〈◊〉 continuance which how farre it preuailed before or after the act the former instructions with the act it selfe doe put in some cleerenesse But a case or two will make it more plaine Amy Townsend seised of a Mannor in tayle take a husband the husband made a feoffement 29. of H. 8. to diuers persons in fée to the vse of himselfe and his wife for life of them two with remainders of vse ouer After this Statute made Amy and her husband made a Lease for 21. yeares of part of this Manuor according to this act of 32. H 8 Amy died first then her husband died the question is whether Amy were remitted to her former estate taile by vertue of 27. H. 8. ca. 10. and so the Lease good 〈◊〉 was argued on the one part that reduction of the possession by the statute 27. c. was of effect alone with their feoffement and because this possession was regained without either tort or folly in the wife whose agréement whether she would or no was included in her husbands agreement during Couerture she must néeds when Couerture was dissolued till disclaimer or some act done to the contrarie be â—diudged in possession there was then no tenant against whom to bring her cui in vita if she should not bring her cui in vita to purge the first wrong she must needs be remitted if she were remitted this cause must néeds be good And although the Statute of 27. settle possessions according to qualitie and quantitie of the vse yet it séemeth not that so it shall continue but they may change by a former ancient right for the Act being affirmatiue takes not the Common Lawes operation in remitters besides that it hath an expresse sauing of eygne right further if that the wife should not be remitted this inconuenience followeth the Baron might charge the Wiues inheritance with a rent to the whole yearly value or be bound in a Statute merchant c. and then making a feoffement to his wiues vse shee should hold the land charged after his death To this it was answered on the other part that the feoffement at the time therof made a discontinuance which puts Amy to her cui in vita which because she hath not vsed but is come to possession onely by force of 27. c. she must take it onely by the manner order and limitation of the same Statute Couerture or infancie being no whit materiall because the Statute hath none exception The words are in manner forme qualitie and condition of the vse c. and because this was a new Constitution of that which was not at the Common Law it
impedit the Plaintiffe may haue one writ to the Bishop and another to the Sheriffe to enquire of dammages Likewise 14. H. 8. fol. 25. in a plea of dower vpon confession the demandant recouered Iudgement and after Iudgement auerring that her husband died seised shee prayed a writ to enquire of dammages habuit for if the demandant in dower will recouer dammages shee must euer surmize that her husband died seised though the Tenant confesse the Action or plead but onely to the Writ and in the end of her Demise shee may maintaine the Writ for sur plee briefe the dying seised appeares not without surmise c. 22. H. 6. fol. 44. SECT X. Deteiner of Euidence BY Perkins none may deteine Dower for deteining of euidence but only the heire to whom the euidence belongeth and the heire when he pleads must shew what the euidence is c. And they must concerne the lands discended vnto him whereof Dower is demanded for hée may not deteine Dower of land which the Charters concerne not or for Charters concerning his purchased lands or those whereof he hath no seisin Aliter if they concerne some reuersion descended But if the heire come in vouched to warranty by the Barons feofée hée cannot plead this Deteiner of Euidence because in verity the land is another mans to whom most rightly the Charters belong But one copercener may haue this plea after partition against her mother or other Demandant in Dower though the euidence concerne the other parceners and her all alike see 41. Titulo Dower in Brooke If a widdow that is with child deteine euidence against her husbands daughter and heire or other heire collaterall it shall bée no sufficient plea to delay Dower 1. Perkins 70. 71. 18. Hen. 8. fol. 1. The heire said the Demandant deteined a bagge ensealed with the euidence concerning the land which if hée would deliuer hee was ready to render Dower bone plee per Curiam 33. Hen. 6. fol. 51. The Tenant pleaded for part of the land whereof Dower was demanded non tenure for another part detinue of Charters for another part Ioyntenancie which his father for a fourth part demanded view but it might not be granted because he tooke notice to himselfe of that part by pleading to the rest And the Plaintiffe to his plea of suruiuor pleaded his release made to the father her husband in his life time Issiâ—â— seisi que Dowre c. The plea of Euidence detained as Littleton said went to the whole action quod fuit negatum vâ—de Brooke â—y Dower 4 but he was forced to shew what euidence he deteineth viz. a speciall Charter 4â— Ed. 3. The Tenant pleaded a withholding of Euidence certaine conceâ—ning his inheritance and shewes what Et qâ—e il aâ— estre toures temps prist si c. the woman made title to two deeds by gift to her husband and her selfe and for the other Euidence shee said whereas the Defendant claimed as brother and heire to her husband shee kept it to the vse of her child si ouâ—sqÌ„ soit inseint qÌ„ serra â—eure si dien luy done nostre and issue was taken whether she were insâ—int die obitus mariti not whether shee were inseint per son baron die obitâ—s And that booke of 41. Edw. â— is cited for law in Sir Edw. Cokes 7. Rep. fol. 9 that a woman may deteine Charters for the heire in ventre â—a mere And 22. Hen. 6. fol. 16. It was agréed that deteiner of Euidence is no plea in an Action of Dower vnlesse it concerne Inheritance discended Et siâ— videtur ibidem saith Brooke that if it concerne inheritance though it be not the very land whereof Dower is demanded the plea is good 9. Edw. 4. to plea of Charters deteined the Demandant answered veies cyâ—le fait prâ—â— dower the Court reading and perceiuing it to bee the déed c. gaue iudgement for Dower 14. Hen. 6. fol. 4 The Tenant pleaded detinue of a chest with two fines and other Charters ê‘ Martin Iustice if the Chest were open he ought to declare euery déed specially by it selfe and so it is likewise in action of detinue for a Chest open with euidence quod curia concessit 2. Hen. 7. fol. 6. Is set downe the reason why the certainty of euidence deteined must bee showne viz. That the Iury may be more able to make their verdict and the Court to iugde to whom they appertaine for if they belong to the Defendants purchase he is put to a Writ of detinue And 6. Eliz. Dyer 230. sée a man seised of foure acres soccage land and of one déed or Charter concerning those lands by his last will in writing deuised thrée of his acres to his youngest sonne in fée the fourth acre to his wife for life the remainder to a stranger in fee hâ— died his wife got the déed entred into her acre and the sonne into the three acres deuised to him the woman brings a Writ of Dower for a third of these thrée acres The sonne pleads detinue of the Charter which if she would deâ—â—uer he is and alwayes had beene ready to render Dower shee shewed the whole cause by way of replication vpon that the other side demurred It seemeth saith Dyer that this plea serueth for none saue only the Barons heire and for no land but that which is descended And not for the heire himselfe if he come in by voucher or â—s Tenant by receipt in default of Tenant for life Where hee is no more but tenant per admittance for such a one cannot say that he hath béene toutes temps prist a render Dower si c. Neither can gardian in chiualry haue this plea for he cannot haue a writ of detinue of the heires euidence And this plea is a bar for no lands but those which the Charters deteined do concerne 22. H. 6. Where Newton saith the reason of this barre is because the euidence being séene and looked into may yéeld matter to barre the Demandant of her Dower for such lands therefore as the Charters doe not touch Dower shall be granted of them this plea notwithstanding Also certainty must euer bee alleaged in this case if the euidence bee not in some bag boâ— or chest sealed or locked vp And note the Defendant supra was not named heire by the demandant neither had he inabled himselfe to this plea as heire therefore the Court might take it indifferently As in a quare impedit if the incumbent bee named Clericus the Court takes him for a Disturber if hee inable not himselfe as incumbent or person impersonée Another fault was found in this Tenants conclusion of his plea because hee said vncoâ—e prist a render Dower but in very déed hee relied not againe on the condition if the Demandant would deliuer the Charter according to the ancient booke of entries And at the last iudgement was giuen pro dote Sée Sir Edw. Cokes 9. Rep. in Anna Beddingfelds case 1.
this proportion by a Statute made 25. Ed. 3. and for this aide every Lord may either distraine or bring his writ de auxilio habendo at his election but tenant by grand serjeanty or petit shall not pay this aide Mich. 21. He. 4. fol. 32. no more shall coppy-holders as séemeth by the writ both in Fitzherbert and Bracton for it is Precipimus ut habere facias rationabile auxilium de Militibus et liberetenentibus Now if the Kings writ runne for it before the Statute how is it that Bracton saith it was due but de gratis That perhaps he meant but for the quantity ipse videriâ— if the father dye the daughter being unmarried shee shall recover so much as was gathered and not paied her at the hands of the executor or heire but this aide is onely for the marriage of the eldest daughter and not for no daughter where many make but one heire But sée Bracton fol. 36. b. Where he saith primae genitae filiae non dabitur auxilium tale quia istud auxilium pertinet ad Cap. dom sicut pertineret si non esset nisi unus haeres cum omnes sunt quasi unus hâ—eres SECT V. A Woman compellable to serve THe next age of a Woman is 9. yeares when shee is dowable but wee will stay a while with the virgins concerning whom if they be in the power and governance of parents masters or prochein amies or if they bee poore the Law differeth little or not much from the common forme apperteyning unto males unlesse it been in cases of rape which I reserve to the end of my discourse where the poore have least need of subsidie onely this I observe here By a Statute made 5. Eliz. ca. 4. Two Iustices of peace in the Countrie or the head officer and 2. Burgesses in Cities c. may appoint any woman of the age of twelue yeares and under 40. being unmaried and out of service to serve and bee retained by yeare weeke or day in such sort and for such wages as they shall thinke méet and if she refuse they may commit her to prison till she shall be bound to serve SECT VI. Of Heires BVt leaving this sort to the title of day laborers come we to women wards in the custody of their lords And take for the foundation here the Statute it selfe West 1. Cap. 22. This Statute expresly reciting the materiall point of the Statute of Merton willeth it in every of them to be observed Merton Cap. 6. and the Statute of Merton is this Whosoever lay person shall bee convicted bee hee parent or other to have detained abduced or married puerum aliquem he shall yéeld the value of the marriage and be imprisoned untill yee have both made amends to the partie damnified if the ward bee married and satisfaction to the King for the transgression hoc de haerede infra 14. c. but if any heire of 14. yeares age or upward till 21. shall marry himselfe without gréeing with his Lord to defraud him of the marriage where the Lord offered him a convenient marriage and without disparagement there it shall be lawfull to hold the inheritance untill and after the full age of 21. yeares by so long time as shall suffice to reape and receive the double value of the marriage secundum est inationem legalium hominum et secundum quod pâ—oeodem maritagio prius fuerit oblatum sine fraude malitia et secundum quod probare poterit in Curia Dm. Regis Let us speake of heires and see a litle in what cases a woman shall inherit It is knowne to all that because women lose the name of their ancestors and by marriage usually they are transferred in alienam familiam they participate seldome in heireship with males and therefore Bracton is bold to say Nunquam ad successionem vocatur femina quaÌ„diu haeres superfuerit ex masculis but to this rule he subjoyneth exception and examples the very same which are in Littleton To wit exception of right line right bloud and maner of giving SECT VII Of the right Line A Female may be preferred in succession before a male by the time wherein she commeth as a daughter or daughters daughter in the right line is preferred before a brother in the transversall line and that aswell in the common generall taile as in fee simple for example land is given to a man and to the heires of his body who dyeth having issue two sonnes of which the eldest dieth leaving issue a daughter this daughter shall inherit by the right of blood also a woman shall bee preferred propter jus sanguinis Example a man hath issue a sonne and a daughter by one venter and a sonne by another venter the first sonne purchaseth in fee and dieth without issue the sister shall inherit So it is where a man seised in fee hath issue ut supra and dieth his eldest sonne entereth and dieth without issue c. Bracton who hath both these cases disputeth here as if he were seeking a knot in a bulrush and he findeth a difference where the inheritance is Discendens and Perquisita But Littleton is plaine though the second sonne bee heire to the father in the last case and therfore should have had the land had the eldest sonne neuer entered yet the case being as it is possessio fratris de feodo simplici facit sororem de integro sanguine esse heredem whether the fee was descended or perquisit what skils it here it must needs be if the brother was heire of the blood of the first purchasor that the sister of the whole blood is so too yet there is a great difference betweene land purchased by him that died seised and land discended unto him for the first may goe to the heire on the fathers side for default of such to the heire of the mothers side but land discended must alwaies goe to heires of the blood of the first purchaser and the case may bee such that a female shall cary away inheritance from a male though there be no difference of right line or in the integrity of blood which Bracton calleth jus sanguinis duplicatum as where Iohn Stile purchaseth in fee dieth without issue an ant or ants or uncles daughter on the father side shal inherite before an uncle or uncles sonne on the mothers side where they be both collaterall and the integrity or neernes of blood is alike Put case that the purchasor died leaving issue only Iohn the younger and this Iohn married or unmarried dieth without issue now cannot the land goe to the heires on the part only of the mother of young Iohn and therefore ye must ascend a step higher to the marriage of the father and mother of the first purchasor if ye will finde who shall inherit where if there be neither brother nor sister to the purchasor a daughter to the eldest uncle on the fathers side may inherite before any of the
mothers side yea and before a sonne of the second uncle on the part of the father and this by the worthinesse of blood I will not examine the crainkes of discent but turne to the case where possession of the brother excludeth a brother and taketh in a sister If a man hath issue a sonne and daughter by one venter and a sonne by another and give land to the eldest sonne in taile now if the father die and the reversion in fée discend to the eldest sonne who likewise dies without issue of his body the second sonne shall have this land For here was no possession but an expectance of fée simple in the eldest Per omnes Iusticiarios de Communi Banco 24 E. 3. fol. 13. For it is possessio fratris non reversio fratris c. Yet Thorpe Iustice of the Kings Bench thought the land should goe to the daughter Brooke con Brooke discent 13. Againe afine was levied to I. and A. his wife in taile the remainder in fée to A. they had issue a sonne and the husband died the wife tooke another husband by whom shee had issue another sonne and died the eldest sonne entered and died without issue the collaterall heire to him entered as into the remainder in fée and the youngest sonne of the halfe blood to execute the fée brought a Scire facias which was holden good for though the eldest might have charged forâ—ited or given the fée simple by atteinder yet it was not actually in him and therefore the demi sanke none impediment but the younger sonne might have it as heire to his mother 24. E. 3. fol. 30. Which cases prove that the possession of a brother to convey the fee to a collaterall heire if it be not apprehendeth actively the generall heire to the common ancestor may enter Therefore where there is a son or daughter by one venter and a puisne sonne by an other venter if the father die seised of an advouson or a rent and the eldest son died before he present or receive the rent the daughter shall not inherit and if the father die seised of an use in fee possessio fratris facit sororem esse haeredem by taking the profits of the ground 5. E. 4. 7. Where it is said that if the father by testameÌ„t bequeath the profits for tearme of yeares this letteth not the possession of the eldest brother otherwise it is if it had beene for tearme of life and the like difference is by this booke if a lease be made for yeares or for life of lands not in use c. SECT VIII Where the manner of gift altereth the discent BRactons first exception to his general rule that a Woman shall not inherit when there is an heire male is Nisi contrarium faciat modus donationis His example is A man giveth land to one in mariage with his daughter to them two and to the heires of their bodies they have issue a daughter and the husband dying the wife taking another husband hath by him a sonne and dieth the daughter shall inherit per modum donationis the case is plaine But Littleton hath a limitation where modus donationis doth cleane exclude Women from inheriting That is where lands are given to a man the heires male of his body now if he die having issue a sonne and a daughter by one wife and a second sonne by a second wife the daughter can never inherit nay if he die having issue a daughter onely which daughter hath a sonne neither daughter nor son shall inherit for whosoeuer shall inherit by force of an intaile made to heires males must per modum donationis be males coÌ„vey his disceÌ„t to it per heirs males which because the sonne cannot doe here the donor may reenter But Littleton saith also lest women should take the matter unkindly at his hand that where land is given to a man to the heires females of his body his issue female shal inherit per formaÌ„ doni not the issue male for the will of the giver must be observed He hath another case which I may not omit When lands are given a man to the heires males of his body which have issue 2. sonnes the eldest dyes having issue a daughter if hée lease the land for tearme of yeares the reversion descendeth to the sonne but if the lease bée for tearme of life of the lessée the reversion and the fée simple descendeth to the daughter the discontinuance is the cause here the daughter is in not in the per but contra modum donationis by violating the will of the giver SECT IX Where a woman comming to lands shall retaine them c. NOw I will shew you where a female having gotten inheritance per modum donationis or otherwise shall retaine it and where not Marke well this case Iohn died seised of fée leaving issue Robert the eldest sonne and Richard the puisne Robert entred tooke a wife and had issue Alice which Alice died hée tooke another and leaving her great with childe hée died the Lord seized the land and ward of Alice and granted the custody to one which indowed the wife of Robert she was delivered of a sonne William The Lord seized William his ward which lived ten yeares and died without issue Henry the sonne of Richard the second sonne of Iohn entereth Alice entereth upon Henry and hée brings an assise now because the possession of the Lord was seisin and possession of William to whom Alice was but of the halfe blood it was awarded that Henry should recover But by the opinion of the Court the land which the wife held in dowre should goe to Alice for therein William had Broke dispent pl. 19. no more but a reversion 8. Assisa pl. 6. Againe Henry seised of tenements deviseable in Winchester where the Custome is that hée which is seised by devise may not with warranty or without warranty make alienation to barre the reversion or remainder deviseth them to his wife Alice for tearme of life the remainder to Th. his sonne for life so that Th. should make no alienation quo minus tenementa devenirent propinquioribus haeredibus de sanguine puerorum post mortem predicti Thom. Henry died having issue Steven an elder sonne and Maud a daughter which had issue Eliz. Steven died without issue Alice the wife entered and died seised Tho. entereth and alieneth in fée with warranty Maâ—d dieth Elizabeth maketh claime by taking the haspe of the doore in her hand Tho. dieth without issue Eliz. entereth upon the alienee he puteth her out shée bringeth an assise It was holden that the heires of Henry had nothing in the fée simple by the limitation which went not to his children but to the next of blood to his children excluding ses infants demesne And by Wilby if B. make a lease to Alice for life the remainder to the néerest of blood if he die having issue 2. sonnes and the
common so in that which followeth they are like jointenants If two sisters enter into their deceased fathers lands and every of them having issue a sonne dieth before partition so that one moitie descendeth to one sonne and one moitie to another which sons enter and occupy the lands in common if they bee now disfeised they shall have but one assise and not severall assises Because although they come in here by divers discents yet still they are partners and that not onely in regard of the seisin possession which their mothers had but rather in respect of the estate which descended to their mothers from the common ancestors the grandfather to whom they are but one heire so that of a disseisin before partition they shal have but one assise SECT XVI Difference of partners from both jointenants and tenants in Common BY Bryan 10. Ed. 4 fo 3. one copartner may in feoffe another copartner for though their possession bee joint yet their right and interest is severed so that if one sister die the other shall claime a moitie by discent from her and not the intire inheritance from the Common auncestors Partners in this therefore are like tenants in Common whose title and right are separated and therefore they may infeoffe one another But it is otherwise with jointenants whose right is intire and goeth with the possession by survivour Againe partners may release the one unto the other and in this they are like jointenants only for if one tenant in Common release to his fellow his moitie passeth not because that hee to whom the release is made hath in the franck tenemeÌ„t of this moitie no possession But partners whose right is from one roote have a more co 〈…〉 ect possession then tenants in common and may release one unto another To conclude this point partners differ from both jointenants and tenants in common in this that partners are and alwaies were compellable to make partition so was neyther of the other two before the Statute 31. H. 8. cap. 1. which ordaineth that jointenants tenants in common of inheritance which in England or Wales in the right of themselves or their wives shal be compellable by writ de participatione to be devised in Chancery to make partition And that after partition they and their heires shall have mutuall aid one of another for the deraigning of a warranty peramount to recover pro rata as is used betwixt partners at the common law Afterward 32. H. 8. cap. 32 it is ordeined that if any have equal estate with others or in common jointly for tearme of life or for yeares or unequal estate with such as have an adhering inheritance they shall likewise be coÌ„pellable to make partition Provided that this shall not bee prejudiciall to any person other then the parties to it their executors or assignes SECT XVII Of the Nuper obiit BVt ere wee goe any further in partition let us sée what actions may lie betwixt partners for their inheritance before they have divided it And first of the Nuper obiit This is a writ and commandement of the King to the sheriffe to summon a coheir to be before the Kings iustices at a day certaine to shew why she or he for it lieth betwixt parcenersin Gavell kind also deforceth the plaintiffe coheire from her reasonable part belonging to her of the inheritance of I. S. their grandfather father uncle brother grandmother aunt sister or cousin as the case requireth whose heires they be qui Nuper obiit ut dicitur This writ lieth for lands holden in fée simple onely betwixt coheires where one or more of them deforceth or holdeth out his or their fellow coheire or coheire c. It must be brought in the name of all those which be deforced though in verity there be but one that sueth And this 1. may haue a writ of summoneas ad sequenduÌ„ against her negligent copartners who if they appeare not the sole plaintiffe shall be receiued to sue for her portion against the deforcer If after the ancestors death a kinsman enter claiming by descent the Nuper obiit lieth not against him but after entry and ouster an assise of novell disseisin or a writ of right for though coheires may haue Amordancester against a stranger yet can they not haue it against one of their owne parenteale priuy in blood and claiming by the same descent and where a writ of right sometimes is betwéene sisters as where one is infeoffed by déed and another claimeth by discent battaile lieth not nor the grand assise but an inquest in licu thereof Thus far V. N. B. The New Na. Bre. not disagréeing saith further That if one sister deforce another of the land whereof her ancestor died seised in estate of fée taile the remedy must bee by forme done and not by Nuper obiit a Nuper obiit may bée brought of the seisin of the aile besaile or the tresaile and if it be brought of the seisin of the grandfather Darreigne seisin in the father is no good plea without shewing that hée died seised This writ may be brought by the aunt against her sister and niece or by the aunt and niece against another sister niece or by one sister against another that is but of the halfe blood But if the father giue part of his land in francke mariage to one daughter and dye seized c. the donée in francke mariage shall not haue a Nuper obiit against her sister for her part in residue of her fathers fée simple laÌ„d unles she put her land in hotch pot which was given in francke mariage A nuper obiit must be brought by a coheire deforced against all the other coparceners though some of them haue nothing to doe in the demand A villein and his wife shal not haue a Nuper obiit against the coparceners of his wife for hee is not infranchised by marriage with one of those seignioresses to whom hee was bound If a coparcener be deforced by a coparcener and by astranger the deforced may haue a Nuper obiit against her coparcener and iointenancie abateth not the writ no more shall non-tenure of parcell of the thing demanded by rule of the register If two coparceners enter after the ancestors death and deforcing a third parcener doe afterward make partition and then one of them alieneth her portion in fée the deforced partner may by a Nuper obiit against her two coheires notwithstanding the alination recouer a third part of that which is not aliened and a third part of that which is aliened by a mortdancester or writ of Aile as the case lieth and in her owne name and in the name of her two coparceners against the alienâ—â— If one coparcener infeoffe a stranger in fee and take backe an estate in fee or for life it seemeth a Nuper obiit is maintenable still against her so long as she disclaime not in the blood c. But 21. Ed. 3. and
the woman they shal remaine ioyn-tenants of the Franke Tenement and the Inheritance is gone Tailâ— 9. But per Dyer fo 147. and 12. assi p. 22. and 19. assi p. 2. If Tenants in Franke Marriage be diuorced the Woman shall haue all the Land for the Land was giuen for the womans sake and for her aduancement and by Iohn Bracton her husband hath no more in it but Custodiam as he is the wiues tutor and Guardian By the same reason therefore that the wife shall haue the land if she be diuorced by the same I should thinke she should haue it if her Sponsus refuse to marry her But where I giue Land to one to marry my Daughter or if hee marry my Daughter there if hee marry another woman I may enter SECT XXXVI The word Franke Marriage maketh Inheritance IF a man giue lands with his Sister to I. S. in Franke Marriage habendum â—is haeredibus suis in perpetuum By Kniueâ— Mowbray and Finchden 45. Ed. 3. fo 19. this maketh neither Frank Marriage nor estate taile with an expectance of fée as in Case where Lands are giuen expresly in taile habendum eis haeredibus but the fee-simple passeth presently by the gift for Frank Marriage must be holden of the Donor which here hath nothing left in him but all is holden of the Lord Parainount and the words doe not make any other estate taile yet 13. Ed. 1. lands were giuen to one with the Cousin of the Donor in Franke Marriage habendum eis haeredibus and it was taken for good Frank Marriage This saith Brooke was in the yeare that estates taile were made in But for all that if yee look the case in Fitzherbert Formedone 63. whither Brooke sendeth you you shall perceiue that at the time of the gift it was Franke Marriage in fée-simple for by those dayes the Donee had potestatem alienandi post prolem suscitatâ—m But in a gift made after the Statute of quia emptoreâ— on such a fashion I take it the Law will be as before in the case 45. Ed. 3. According as it was also holden in the yeares of H. 8. that if a gift bee made in Franke Marriage the remainder to I. S. in fée this is no good Franke Marriage for warrantie and acquitall that are incident c. bee only in regard of the reuersion to the Donor and they cannot be had when the fée-simple is presently conueyed to a stranger SECT XXXVIII The Accompt of the Degrees LIttl accounts the Degrees from the Donor to the Donees the first Degrée from the Donées to their Issue the second from the Donées Issue to his Issue the third c. and the Issue in the fift Degrée shall doe seruice And this saith he because the Issue of the Donor and the Issue of the Donée after the fourth Degrée past may inter-marrie by holy Churches Law Bracton accompts thus donatarius facit primum gradum haeres suus facit secundum haeres haeredis facit tertium haeres secundi haeredis facit quartum qui tenebitur ad seruitium yea hee maketh it an expresse rule that onely the Donée and two heyres succéeding lineally shall enioy the immunitie of being acquitted And hee seemeth to vnderstand no other reason of the acquitall so long but onely an abstenancie from homage lest the taking of it should hinder a reuerting if it betided the Donée or the Issue to die without Issue Fitzherbert titulo droit 55. and 60. citeth 6 H. 3. and 15. H. 3. in warrant of Bractons Computation which I thinke he fetched not any further then out of the Author himselfe in whom fo 21. I find it And fo 22. hee answereth a doubt of his owne asking that is Whether all other seruice shall follow and continue if homage be done ante terâ—ium haeredem wherein he concludeth that the seruice euer followeth homage quamuis ad damnum soluentium And I conclude whether it be the third heyre or the fourth that shall doe seruice he may still vouch haue a Writ of me ne as if the fourth Degrée were not past and if he bring a Formedone the Writt shall be Dedit in liberum Maritagium SECT XXXIX A Woman giues Lands to one to marry her AS Franke Marriage maketh Inheritance without the words Heyres and is alwayes made to a woman and for her sake so there is another Donatio propâ—er nuptias that is conditionall without words of Condition made euer by a woman to a man That is where a woman giues Land to a man in fee-simple or for tearme of his life to the intent that hee marry her who if hee afterwards when hee is thereto within conuenient time required refuse c. there is now an ordinary Writt for remedy granted in this case to reduce the Land which Writt may be sued in the per cui or post after one or more alienations either by the woman sole or by her and her husband married against such a one as should haue married her after the refusall or after her death by her Heyre whether it bee Sonne or Daughter or Daughters with the child of another and there needs no scripture or writing to proue that the feoffement was for intent of Marriage nay if a woman infeoffe a stranger to the intent to infeoffe her and one which she intendeth to marrie if now the espousals take not effect she may haue Writt causa Matrimonij prelocuti against the stranger though the déed of feoffement were simple and sans Condition an 34. Ed. 3. li. assi and 40. Ed. 3. li. assi a woman enfeoffed one which had a wife and entred for non-performance of the Condition heritance of woman and in this part because it resembleth the Donations that are propter nuptias the Doctrine of it being something like that of Dower SECT XLI Marriage THis Courtesie is in the Inheritance of a Wife therefore a consequent of lawfull Marriage and exceptions of Concubinage or such like which are impediments of Dower must needs be good exceptions here SECT XLII Seisin THere must be in the wife a seisin and possession for if she were but heyre in appearance die before her Ancestor this auaileth her husband nothing Similie If the Father being seised of Lands dye and soone after his Daughter and Heyre dyeth before actuall seisin had by entrie either by the husband wife or other person for them so that no possession and a naked possession in law here is all one yea the law is taken that if a man dwell in Essex with his wife and lands descend to her in Yorkeshire if she die the next day after before entrie the husband shall not bee Tenant by the Courtesie for euen in this case is found a default in him that he did not constitute one to make entrie for him maintenant after the Auncestors death yet if rent descend to a woman Couert c. which dieth before day of payment or after the day and no
matter but the other conclusion puts it to the Law and Courts consideration Yee sée now of what possession of Law a woman is dowable per Brian 4. H. 7. â—o 17. if the Kings ward die vnder age and the neâ—t heyre being married die before â—â—uâ—nâ—runt sued his wife shall not haue Dower But by Dâ—uers and Hussey if the Kings Tenants Heyre haue a wife and after office found the Heyre doth not enter but dieth the wife shall be endowed of the possession in Law before office for the Statute of prerogatiue cap. 13 is intended onely where the Heyre taketh a wife after office and intrudeth SECT LIX There must be in the Husband an Inheritance not cut from the Franke Tenant A Woman shalll haue no Dower in Lands whereof the Frankement and Inheritance was neuer conioyned in her husband during Couerture therefore where the Husband had but a reuersion after estate for life the wife is not dowable vnder this rule commeth one other dos de dote peti non debet And if a man seised c. take a wife and alien with warrantie and then both the feoffor and feoffée die if the wife of the feoffée bring a Writt of Dower against the heyre of the feoffor which voucheth to warrant the heyre of the feoffor and hanging the voucher the wife of the feoffée demands Dower against the heyre of the feoffée if shée bring her Writt not for a third of two paâ—ts but for a third of all that whereof her husband dyes seised she shall not haâ—e iudgement fill the first plea be determined Littleton If there be father and sonne both married and the Father seised of one acre c. dieth and the sonne entreth and dieth if now the sonnes sonne enter and endow his Grandmother which dieth his mother is not Dowable of that which the Grandmother held in Dower for of that his Father had no more in méere right but a reuersion vpon or after a Franke tenement and the Grandmother endowed was in of her Husbands possession yet if the father had in his life time iâ—feoffed the Sonne c. the sonnes wife might well haue Dower after the Grandmothers death of that very Land which the Grandmother held And if the sonnes sonne voluntarily or compulsarily â—â— Writ of Dower had endowed his mother against whom the Grandmother had then receiued her Dower and died after execution the mother might well haue entred into the land which the ailesse recouered against her Parkins 63. The Franke tenement and Inheritance may be both in a sort in the Husband and yet not sufficiently knit and vnited together to giue Dower for example the Lands bee giuen to two and to the heyres of the body of one of them if hee which hath the inheritance die first his Wife is not dowable no not after the death of the suruiuor for the state taile was not executed in her husband to all intents though the Issue in a Formedone against an abater might alleage seisin and esplees as we call them in his father Likewise if by fine sur graunt render estate be made to a husband for terme of life the remainder to I. S. his sonne in taile the reuersion to the right heyrâ—s of the husband and the fine is executed if now the Baron die liuing I. S. or any of his Issue the wife of the Cognusée is not dowable But if a Lease be made for yeares the remainder to I. S for life the remainder to his right heyres c. the wife of I. S. shall haue Dower of this estate though erecution of Dower cannot be â—asting the terme And if a Lease be to the Husband for life with a remainder to a stranger for â—eares the remainder to the Husband in â—ée the inheritance and Franke Tenement are sufficiently connexed to giue the wife Dower bâ—t execution shall cease during the terme for when an estate for yeares is more ancient or as ancient as the Inheritance which the Husband had during Couerture there the execution of Dower to the Wife must néeds tarrie the termes expiration And so it is if a man grant me a rent in fée by Indenture with Condition that the rent shall cease during the non-age of mine heyres my Wife shall not bee endowed during mine heyres minoritie What if a man that is seised in Fée-simple make a lease for life rendring rent c. and then taking a Wife he dieth the heyre shall haue this rent incident to the reuersion and it shall be aâ—ets to him in a Formedone in Descender but the wife gets here no Dower aâ—d saith Parkins a woman shall not be endowed of a rent reserued by her Husband to himselfe and his Heyres vpon a Lease for yeares 1. Ed. 6. titulo Dower in Brooke accordeth If the Law be so Dower hath lesse fauour in this case then the estate per Courâ—â—siâ— d'Angleterre But Cléere if a man take a wife first lease his Lands for yeares or for life and die now the Wife may recouer Dower of the Land it selfe and by Breton if the woman recouer the third part of Lands leased for yeares de office de iustice il serra a gard que el tertiâ— remnant les deux parties que demorent de terre iesques aâ—â—nt que il eâ—t receiue al value de le tierrâ— partie que il auera perduâ— c. But if she recouer all the Land leased from the termer he shall haue recouerie per plâ—â— de garranti either of such other Lands as the Lessor had or if he had no other of the Lands seised when the widdow is dead by sâ—irâ— facias out of the Court where the Iudgement was inrolled Note That though the Law be as is abouesaid where Lands are giuen to two and to the Heyres of one of them yet if the Husband purchase to himselfe and his wife and to the heyres of the Husband the wife may relinquish the purchase and disagree by bringing her Writ of Dower Like Law séemeth to be where the purchase is to the Baron and feme during the life of the Baron the remainder to his right heyres SECT LX. Of what things Dower is granted LIttletons ground is of Lands or tenements But a woman is Dowable also of all manner of rents which are rents of Inheritance Also of Offices as for example of a Bayly-wicke in fée a woman may haue the third part of the profit in Dower and be contributary to the charge Also at this day where the Baron hath but an vse in fée-simple or fée-taile generall vnlesse it be in case where the Husband may and doth disagrée the wife shall haue Dower and if a bargaine and sale be made of Lands to the Husband which dieth before inrolement the wife notwithstanding shall haue Dower and by the inrolement einsement it shall be indefeisable against the Vendor and the Heyre of the Vendée Also a woman is Dowable of Villaines regardant to a Mannor and if a villanie in gros a
Lessor running to smoke rightly to smoke which is something more then nothing for if after all this the Lessor bring an action of waste against the Baron and Feme the Baron cannot barre her by shewing her reprisall and remitter but hee is stopped from speaking against his owne Feoffement and receipt So that here may bee an estoppell or conclusion by a matter not witnessed with specialty or any manner Scripture But if in the action of waste the Baron will make default at the grand distresse the wife vpon her prayer receiued to shew her matter shall barre the Lessor of his action right well For in euery case where a woman is receiued to plead in her husbands absence she shall haue aduantage as if shee were a Feme sole And the reason why rendring backe the land by the Alien to Baron and Feme worketh a remitter though it were by â—ne is because a Feme Couert that taketh any thing by fine is neuer examined by the Iustices But where somewhat is to bee conueyed from a Feme Couert by a fine as if Baron and Feme make cognizance to another c. or a grant or render or a release by fine in all or such like cases because the right of a Wife is passing and she shall be eternally concluded she must bee examined before the fine can be receiued and if shee confesse that her husband menaced her if shee would not leuie the fine c. it shall not be receiued 15. E 4 â—0 1. But where nothing is moued in fines saue onely a wiues purchase and gaining there is vsed none examination of her and therefore such fines doe not conclude her If Tenant in taile discontinueth it and dieth and the discontinuee makes a Lease to the Daughter and heyre of the Tenant in taile being of full age and to her husband for their two liues the daughter is remitted If Baron and Feme Tenants in speciall taile be and the Baron alieneth in fée and takes backe an estate to him and his wife for their liueâ— because they are but one person and the estate is likewise one and intire without moities and the Feme cannot be remitted here without the Husband be also remitted they are adiudged both in their remitter But the Baron himselfe is stopped from claiming so much contrary to his owne alienation If Lands he giuen to a Woman in taile remainder to another in taile remainder to a third in taile with remainder ouer in Fee if the woman take a husband that discontinueth in fee all the remainders are discontinued and if the Wife dyeth without Issue there is no remedie but a Formedon by turne if the first second or third Donée die without Issue But if after the discontinuance an estate be made to the Baron and Feme for their owne life or another mans life or any other estate the Wife is remitted and so are all they in remainder If the Feme die the next in remainder may enter and so is it for them in the reuersion after the caile is ended A Lease of a house is made to a Feme sole for terme of her life and in a â—aint or false action a stranger recouereth this house against her by default so that she may haue a quod ei deforcear by West 2. ca. 4. now is the reuersion of the Lessor discontinued and hee cannot haue an action of waste But if the woman marries and the recouerer lease this house to the Baron and Feme for life the wife is remitted to her first estate by the Lease the first Lessor to his reuersion and he may haue action of waste if there because Yet here if the other which recouered in the false action bring an action of waste the Baron hath no other remedie but to make default at the grand distresse and then the wife receiued may bar him by shewing the fainâ—nes or falshood of his action whereby he recouered If after discontinuance c. the Baron take backe estate to himselfe and his Wife and to a third person this is a remitter for a moity and for the other moity the Feme must sue her cui in vita after the death of her Husband If after discontinuance of the Wiues estate the Baron goe beyond the Seas and the discontinued lease the Land to the Wife for life and deliuer seisin if the Baron agree thereunto at his returne this is a remitter for the Feme shall be adiudged as an Infant and not as a Feme sole in this Case Quaere saith Littleton if the Baron at his returne disagree c. whether this oust the Feme of her remitter If the Baron discontinue the discontinuée be diseised and the disseisor lease the tenements to the Baron and feme for life this is a remitter to the Wife though the Baron were consenting to the disseisin But if the Baron and Feme were both of Conen and Consent to the disseisin the wife shall be a disseiseresse and not remitted If the discontinuée make backe estate to Baron and Feme by indenture vpon condition viz. rendring rent and for fault of payment re-entry and because the rent is arâ—eare the discontinuée doth re-enter vpon this entry the woman may haue an assise of nouell disseisin after the husbands decease for the condition by the remitter was cleane extinct in truth though during couerture the Baron was estopped c. so that he and his Wife could not haue an assise together If the Baron discontinue take backe estate to himselfe for life the remainder after his decease to his wife for her life here is no remitter till the husband be dead but the Wife suruiuing Franke Tenement is cast vpon her maine Tenant will she nill she by act of Law and shee is remittted for though shee enter not yet shee can haue none action against any body for this land but any man that hath cause may haue action of it against her because a recipe quod reddat is maintainable against tenant in ley and that is the widdow here But Tenant of Franke Tenement in fair is one which hath an actuall seisin and vpon disseisin thereof may maintaine an assise The Statute of Glocester perceiued how by common Law a man may play fast and loose with his Wiues Inheritance by feoffement to discontinue her estate and to continue it againe by resumption and so to make it Inheritance or not to his wiues at his pleasure But a feoffement doth onely barre the Wiues entry what if to his feoffement the Baron aimes warrantie what if to his warrantie assets what if he leuie a fine Glocester ca. 3. anno 6. Ed. 1. is If Tenant by the Courtesie alion c. his sonne shall not be barred in a Writt of Mortdancester by the deed of his Father from whom none heritage is descended to demand and recouer the mothers land although his Fathers Charter be with warrantie for him and his heyres But if land descend to him de part son
seisin the Baron dieth she accepts the rent the may haue a cui in vita by the common Law for the acceptance here maketh not the Lease good because the liuery which the wife made was as seruant to her Master and onely the act of the Baron Par. 41. we haue concerning acceptances some plentifull Learning 21. H. 6. fo 24. Ascu saith there That if Lessée for yeares bee in arrerage of rent and die his Executors shall pay the arrerages if they occupie the Ferme contra if they waiue possession and so if a Lease for life be made to Baron and Feme the Baron commits waste and dies the wife shall be subiect to an action for waste done by the husband if she occupie the land contra if she waiue the possession and by Paston in the end of the case if Baron seised â—ure vxoris make a lease for life of the land and die the wife can haue no action of waste for she was not partie to the lease ex hoc sequitur that a woman vpon acceptance of rent of lease for yeares made by her husband without being her selfe a partie is not bound but shee may enter And albeit the lease were for life yet acceptance barreth not a cui in vita if she were not partie c. 26. H. 8. â—â— 2. per curiam if Baron and Feme sell the Wiues land make feoffement and the Vendée by the Indenture of sale couenants to pay ten pounds annually to the Baron and Feme during their liues if the Baron die and the feme accept the ten pounds this is no bar in cui in vita no more then acceptance of rent after Marriage dissolued where the Baron a per luy made a feoffement or lease But acceptance of rent c. where they both made a feoffement or lease for life is a barre of all actions I will hunt for no farre fetcht learning of acceptances but this I finde if a man lease his land to â— 8. to hold at will by certaine rent none acceptance of the rent here after the Leassors death can barre the Heyre of entrie or make any â—ffirmance of the lease for acceptance can neither make good a lease determined by entry or a lease already void without entry by the lessors death And he that leaseth to hold at will endeth that will when he endeth his life but a lease for yeares by an Abbot or Tenant in taile is not by their death presently void but voydable and the successour or Issue by acceptance of the rent affirmes the Lease So doth the Feme affirme the Lease made for yeares by her husband of her Land by acceptance when she is become sole and sée Dyer 5. Mar. 159. by the opinion of thrée Iustices Dyer Stamford and Browne if Baron and Feme had made a Lease by Indenture rendring rent and the Baron before rent day die and the Feme before the day take another husband who accepts the rent and dies this acceptance shall bind the Wife but note and take with you this peculiar rule where acceptance binds her that she be a partie to the Lease and that by writing for if a man makes a Lease for yeares without déed of land which he holdeth in right of his wife this was méerly void towards the wife so soone as the Husband is dead and acceptance of the rent is to no purpose Plo. 431. per Bromley Againe 9. H. 6. If tenant in Fée iure vxoris make a Lease for yeares and the wife dieth the Lessée shall pay the rent vntill the Wiues heyre enter for so long there is a continuance of a Fermour by force of the Lease but none â—â—owry lyeth for the Husband because he hath no reuersion And an action of trespasse vi armis may be against him but he cannot haue action of debt for the rent But to come home to the very brinke of the Statute nota saith Dyer That the common opinion amongst all Iustices at this day is If Baron and Feme make a Lease for terme of yeares before the Statute of 32. Hen. 8. by Paroll reseruing rent to them both if the wife when shee is become sole accept the rent at the Fermors hands this binds her not from anoyding the Lease if it were not by Indenture for her assent was requisite at the beginning and that ought to haue appeared by déed Dyer 1. Mar. fo 91. The same Learning is 4. Mar. fol. 146. When a Feme Couert departs from her Land the intent consideration and cause ought to be expressed in scripture to proue her consent to the whole Mannor for it is agréed for Law That if before the Statute Baron and Feme had made a Lease by paroll of the Wiues Land for terme of yeares rendring rent though after the Barons death she had accepted the rent yet she might out the Termer because her priuitie to the Lease appeares not per escript likewise if a feme couert suffer a recouery or fine of her Land it shall be intended by Law to be to her owne vse if there appeare none other intent expresly by Writing And none auerment shall be taken of intent or consideration in such Case other then the Indenture specifieth SECT XXV Obseruations vpon the very Statute I Haue shewed what strength a Demise or Lease for yeares made of the Wiues Land by Baron and Feme or by the Baron onely was of before the Statute and is of being made since the Statute without the appointed circumstance and solemnitie Now a little to the very Statute As I said before the ordinance is that Leases shall bee good c. But not directly that any terme shal be boyd though voyd of strength by this Statute they may be many wayes as appeares by the prouiso Note that the forerunning Lease Demise or occupation by Fermors must bee deriued from one that had Inheritance for if at the end of a primitiue Lease made by the Lord of whom the Tenancie is holden or by the Kings grantée or committée of wardship or by tenant in Dower or by Tenant per le Courtesie some of which may by good possibilitie haue had power to make Leases by space of twice twenty yeares a tenant in tayle makes a Lease this succéeding demise hath no vertue or ingredience of the Statute though it séeme to haue good correspondence with it And it is doubted whether a Ferme continued twenty yeares by the Donors demise be sufficient or no to make roome for a new Lease This for ought I perceiue is by a prudent interpretation of the Constitution rather vpon equitie and intent then vpon the Text tenants in fée simple or tailed which transmit their possession to their déere off-spring will not make Leases to any great disaduantage of any of their owne babes or blood and therefore their Leases may well bee â—mitated But like enough it is that Tenant per le courtesie or in Dower or in right of his owne or in
shall be deemed and construed to be the act of both of them as if the Baron seised in right of his Wife or ioyntly with his wife assigne Dower to another woman it bindeth and so granting of a rent for equality of partition and atturnement by the Baron alone bindes the Wife SECT XXX of Iointures I Will enter no further into the streame of Fines and recouerie they require a cunning swimmer And a short Discourse cannot possibly make any plaine discouery of them otherwise this place would haue borne the Doctrine fitly about making of ioyntures for all husbands are not so vnkinde or vntrusty as to endamage their Wiues by alienation of their Lands but contrariwise the greatest part of honest wise and sober men are of themselues carefull to purchase somewhat for their Wiues if they be not yet they stand sometimes bound by the womans parents to make their Wiues some Ioynture If husband Father Mother and all would be vnmindfull of prouision in this point yet very many of our English women haue with their singular vertue so much wisedome of their owne as to foresee for themselues and discerne the difference betwéene that which wee call Dower and Ioynture Ioyntures saith Dyer 4. M. fo 148 are made for the most part to Baron and Feme ioyntly or to the Feme onely this also is comprehended vnder the terme Ioynture before Marriage or after for sustentation of the charge and necessities of Espousalls and they are made causa matrimonâ—â— gratis without the consideration of money bargaine or any thing sauing for loue and affection of the Baron or his ancessors and these Iointures are a present possession But Dower must be tarried for till the Husband be dead It must be demanded sometime sued for sometime neither with suit or demand obtained Againe Dower was subiect to forfeiture in times past by felony done and proued in the Baron by the Barons treason by the Wiues elopement and euery question in the validitie of Marriage maketh a scruple of Dower all which inconueniences being wisely foreséene women did learne to become ioynt purchasors with their husbands of such estates as would auoid all weathers and a good while they did enioy Ioyntures and Dowers after their Husbands were dead against which the Statute of 27. H. 8. of vses ordeineth as followeth SECT XXXI A part of 27. H. 8. ca. 10. IT is prouided c. that where any persons haue purchased or haue estate of lands c. made to them and their Wiues and to the heyres of the Husband or to the Husband and wife and the heyres of their two bodies or to the heyres of one of their bodies or to the husband and wife for terme of their liues or for the life of the wife or where any such estate hath béene or shall be made to any husband and his wife or to other persons their heyres and assignes to the vse and behoofe of the said husband and wife or to the vse of the wife for the ioynture of the wife that in euery such case the woman hauing such a Ioynture c. shall not claime any Dower of the residue of any Hereditaments that were her Husbands by whom she had such a Ioynture or make any demand thereof against the Tenants of the said lands c. prouided that if any woman be lawfully expulsed or euicted from her said Ioynture or from any part thereof without fraud or Couen by lawfull entry action or discontinuance of her Husband that euery such woman shall be endowed of as much of the residue of her Husbands hereditaments as the Lands or Teneâ—ents so euicted shall amount or extend vnto Prouided that nothing in this act extend to hurt or preiudice any woman heretofore married concerning her right title vse interest or possession which she may claime or pretend to haue for her Ioynture or Dower in any Lands c. of her late Husband being now disseised Prouided also that if any Wife haue or hereafter shall haue any Lands Tenements or Hereditaments vnto her giuen or assured after Marriage for terme of her life or otherwise in Ioynture except the assurance be made to her by act of Parliament and the Wife after that fortune to out-liue her husband in whose time the Ioynture was made that the Wife so ouer-liuing shall and may at her pleasure refuse the Lands appointed or assured in Ioynture and thereupon haue demand and take her Dower by Writt or otherwise according to the Common Law SECT XXXII The Exposition THe first obseruance is that no estate gained by matter of conclusion shall be déemed a purchasement within this Statute or bee auerred to bee made pro iunctura But the Statute must be intended of true and substantiall estates Therefore if an owner or tenant of certaine land make answer to Baron and Feme in an action of waste or if he pray ayde of them as if they were seised of the reuersion or if he bring a quod ei deforceat against them as if he had none other then a particular estate though these things were purposed for Ioynture yet they seclude not a Woman from right or demand of Dower Releases such as inure to make estates as where a ioynt-tenant releaseth to his Companion or such as goe to inlarge an estate as where he in reuersion releaseth to his particular Tenant may well make and accomplish a Ioynture but such Releases as worke no more but vn mitter le droit as where he that is disseised by Baron and Feme releaseth to the woman the disseiseresse c. are no purchase intended within this Statute for it is meant onely of such purchases as the wife hath by gift either of her husband or of some other body and not of such estates as shee hath gained by her owne wrong likewise is it of releases that goe by way of extinguishment as where a Disseisor infeoffeth Baron and Feme and the Disseisée releaseth to one of them this is alike auaileable to both but this release can make no Ioynture for there is no estate conueyed by it Per iusticiarios 6. Ed. 6. Brooke titles Dower a deuise of Land by the Husband to his Wife in his last will and testament is no barre of Dower for it is but a beneuolence and no Ioynture Yet in M. Brograues reading it was holden contrary 5. Eliz. Dyer 220. the case is that a man seised of Lands in taile and of some other in fée-simple holden in socage deuiseth the third part of all his Lands to his wife for her life in full recompence of all such Ioynture and Dower as she shall haue or may claime c. the Wife without any assignement or vser of Action of Dower entreth after his death into that which was holden in Fée-simple to a value of a third part of all and the opinion was she had determined her election and barred her selfe of Dower But this Case maketh nothing to the variance or question because the
of the heire non aliter This saith Dyer is holden no good pleading for the quarentiâ—â— but shee should haue shewed the death of her husband certaine and the time of the forty dayes continuing therefore the opinion of the Court made her wâ—iâ—â— her plea and trauers the entry nâ—ta prolege If a woman marry within the forty dayes shee loseth her quarentine Dower Brooke â—y Dower 101. 1. M. But if otherwise she be ouâ—â—ed by the heire within the forty dayes shee shall haue a Writ de quarentena habenda no â—â— br 161. b. SECT IV. Assignement of Dower NOw to assignement of Dower it is true that when it appeares certaine what it is that a woman shall haue in Dower shee may enter presently when her husband is dead and tarry for none Assignement per Littleton yet Perkins saith if a man dye seised of iij. s. rent charge in fee though here the third part bee certaine enough his widdow shall not distraiâ—â—â— for xij d. before Assignement Nay further if she recâ—â—â—â— this Dower by action yet shee shall not distraine for it before execution But if the Lord of a Manor doe marry with a woman tenant by iij. s. rent and dye here shée shall haue xij d. Dower by way of reteiner without any Assignement And in case where rent is recouered in Dower the Viscount may deliuer seisen by grasse by a bough by a clod of land or by the distresse of beasts taken vpon the land though the day of payment be not yet come But the party cannot charge any those beasts 40. Ed. 3. fo 22. SECT V. who may assigne Dower SOmetime Dower is assignable by the husbands heire as if a man seised of two acres of land in one County make a feoffement of one acre with warranty and dye the heire may indow the widdow with parcell of the acre remaining in allowance and full satisfaction of the whole Dower bene for if in a writ of Dower brought by her against the feoffée of her husband hee vouch the heire c. shee shall recouer conditionally against the voucher And if the heire make a Lease for life of part of such lands as are to him descended and indow his mother of the parcell remaining in allowance of all c. it is good yet in this case in a Writ of Dower against the Lessée if hée vouch his Lessor the recouery shall not be against the vouchée because he is not bound to warranty as the heire of his father But if he had béene generally vouched the heire and had generally entred into warranty iudgement perhaps should bee conditionally against him Sometimes the husbands one feofee or vendée shall assigne Dower for the rest And if a woman accept Dower from one of her husbands feofées in parcell of his land in allowance of her Dower of the rest it séemeth this shall binde her against the other 〈…〉 fees yet some haue doubted thereof because the other feoffees say they cannot plead this in an action of Dower against them neither is there meanes to bring into Court him which made assignement being a stranger If diuers Ioyntenants bee of certaine lands assignement of Dower by one of them shall bée good against them all But if one Ioyntenant of land assigne rent in allowance of Dower his followes shal not be distrained for this rent for there could bee none inforcement to assigne Dower after this manner Likewise if the Desseisor assigne a rent charge out of the land this shall not bind the desseisâ—e causa qua supra Assignement of Dower may be by one which is a Disseisor Abator or Intrâ—dor c. if this assignement be without fraud in the woman indowed and sans â—orâ— to any other person it is good though the Assignor be a tortious Possessor but if there bee any such couine or tort the assignement is voidable for the most part by entry 44. Ed. 3. fol. 46. A woman that had title of Dower with intent of defeating the Tenants warranty made a stranger to enter and against him she recouered Dower it was holden in an Assize which shee brought afterwards that hee recouery would not serue her but her estate was gained by desâ—isin because of the couine Assignement of Dower by him which hath Francktenement is good and if the wife hath not right of Dower of that which is so assigned by the Tenant of the Francktenement yet that shall stand vntill it bee defeated And if tenant per elegit statute staple or statute merchant assigne Dower it is not good And Assignement of Dower by gardian in soccage séemes not to be good saith Perkins for a Writ of Dower lyeth not against such a gardian sée 29. Assis p. 68. But Assignement by gardian in Chiualry is good till it be defeated and it shall neuer be defeated if the womans title of Dower be iust SECT VI. Assignement to her selfe or de la pluis beale IF a man seised of forty acres of land 20. by Chiualry and 20. by soccage die c. and his wife being gardian in soccage bring her Writ of Dower in the Kings or some others Court against the Lord which is gardian in Chiualry he may plead this matter and pray to haue it adiudged that the woman indow her selfe of the faâ—â—est in her owne possession and if she cannot deny the case it shall be iudged for the Lord to retaine quietly the lands which hee hath during the nonage of the Infant And after this iudgement the woman may indow her selfe in presence of her neighbours by limits and bounds de la pluis beale part of the soccage lands to haue to hold to her selfe for terme of her life This manner of indowment is neuer before iudgement bee giuen for it either in the Kings or some other Court and it is to saue the state of gardian in Chiualry Perkins giueth this matter which Litlton leaueth thus raw a turne or two more And so doth Keble 14. Hen. 7. 26. If say they the land which the woman hath by her gardianship bee not the whole valew of her iust Dower for the smalnesse of it or because it is charged with some rent she may shew the matter in her replication And if the Lord cannot deny it or doe trauers it and it is found against him then shall the woman haue so much of the lands holden in Chiualry as together with that shee hath in possession already may make vp iust a third part of her husbands inheritance If the inheritance were all of soccage tenure the widdow being gardian cannot indow her selfe de la pluis beale but shee shall be allowed a third part in her accompt for so long time as shee is Gardian for if she bring her Writ of Dower in this case against the heire he cannot plead her gardinship and that she may indow her selfe Sée 45. Edw. â— fol. 6. If such a Feme gardian bring a Writ of Dower against one whom her husband
vnques seisi que Dower c. THere are other pleas that goe to the action and verie right of Dower as Ne vnques seisi que Dower c. id est The husband had neuer any seisin or state of Inheritance where of the wife can claime Dower sée 45. E. 3. fol. 13. The tenant in Dower leased her whole estate to the heire rendring rent for terme of her life the heire died and this was adiudged a seisin whereof the heires wife might demand Dower though the first tenant in Dower were still aliue for the lease was a Surrender and if a stranger had entred immediately after the heires death his heire must haue had a Mordancester Ergo said one the wiâ—e dowable Yet marke this case â—bid a man seised c. in fée simple dies his sonne entreth and he dies the sons sonne enters and endowes his Aylâ—sâ—e she dies a stranger abateth In this case it is cleere the sons wiâ—e shall haue no Dower of the portion assigned to the Aylesse though the sonnes sonne may haue a Mordancester per Kirton Finch and Mowbray But betwiâ—t this casâ— and the other they say is great oddes for here the Grandmother endowed was in from her husâ—â—â—â— and she sonnes possession and estate howsoeuer to his â—â—ire in whom the fée rested it were not destroyed but hee might bring a Mordancester yet to his wiâ—e it was cleane adnihilate whereas in the first case the Fée and Francktenâ—ment not a whit impeached by the life of her which surrendred were perfectly conâ—â—â—ned in the Baron to whom the Surrender was made And if a râ—uersion be granted to I. S. of certaine lands per faiâ— in pais in which lands I. T. and his wiâ—e haue â—state for life which doe atturne and afterward surrender there is no doubt but I S. his wife if hee die shall hauâ— Dower though it bee indéed defeasible after death of T. K. if his wiâ—e suruiue and will vndâ—â— the Surrendâ—r whereas in our first case the Surrender is no way auoydable but the heires wife shall pay rent according to her portion per Finch â—bâ—â— 14. Ed. 4. fol. 6. Tenant by the courtesâ—e granted his estate to him in reuersion rendring rent with clause of re-entrie for non payment the Grantée married the rent was arréere tenant per le curteâ—â—e re-entred hee in the reuersion died his wife waâ—â—arred of Dower for the Surrâ—nder might well bee vpon candition 2. H. 4. fol. 22. In action of Dower it was pleaded that the Demandants husband had nothing in the land â—ut by 〈◊〉 done to the tenant Iudgement si action c. The woman shewed how her husbands father hauing two sonnes leased his land to the eldest sonne and to hiâ— wife for 〈◊〉 of theâ—r liues and that shee her selfe married with the youngest sonne the eldest died and his wife married with the tenant the father died the reuersion descended to the second sonne being her husband the tonants wife died and he kept possession the Demandants husband did put him out he re-entred she prayed seifin c. Brooke thinketh she ought to haue trauersed the Disseisin And if the Baron had not entred after the death of the eldest sonnes wife she should not haue béene endowed yet saith he 〈◊〉 if without entrie there had not beene a seising in Law and whether the Francktenement which the tenant had once in right of his wife â—e determined in puncto by her death 11. H. 4. 73. In action of Dower the Tenant saith That N. gaue the land to the Baron and his first wife for terme of their liues the remainder in taile to the tenant remainder in Fée to the right heires of the Baron his first wife diâ—d he married this demandant and then hée died and the tenant entred c. he demands Iudgement if of this estate she shall haue Dower This amounted plaine to ne vnques seisi que Dower la puit but per Hanke Thirn that plea might not serue by reason of the Fée simple in remainder which might ingender doubtâ—ulnesse a layes gentes But where a lease was made to Baron for life the reuersâ—on to the Lessor or remainder to a stranger there in action of Dower ne vnques â—eiâ—â— â—ec iâ— good for no manner of Inheritance was in the husband 11. H. 4. 83. Dower was demanded of twentie pounds rent respondetur the Baron had nothing but â—oyntly with â— N. who is yet aliue â—udgement si Dower c. and he was not compelled to shew whether he pleaded as â—ertenant or as Pernor of the rent the Demandant replyed that I. N. had released all his right in the rent â—â— her husband But becauss she shewed not the Déed of â—â—â—ease shee pleaded by aduisement of the Câ—urt seisie que Dower la puit Quaere of the generall â—ssue against the â—â—eciall matter 11. H. 4. 88. A woman shall haue Dower of rent 〈◊〉 chased by her husband in fée though hee die before dâ—â— of payment And if it be pleaded against her Ne vnques fâ—â—â—â— que Dower c. she shall not shew the speciall matter but say seisi que Dower la puit and shew the matter iâ—â—â—â—dence 22. H. 6. 4â— per Newton In action of Dower the â—â—nant plead Ioynt estate to the Baron and I. N. in plein vy whose estate he hath the demandant shall not say â—â—â—â—â— que dower c. vnlesse shee shew how or trauerse that I. N. tooke nothing by she Feoâ—ment â—9 H. 6. fol. 9. Against Dower the Tenant pleadeâ— that I. S. seised in Fée infeoffed him and hee leased to the Baron to hold at will which estate hee continued all his life time sâ—ns câ—o that he was seised of any such estate que Dower la puit the Iudges orderad that for the long continuance of the possession and dought deslais gâ—â—â— all should be entred 10. H. 6. 17. It is not a good plea against Dower â—o say the Baron had nothing but for terme of his life for this amounts to the generall 〈◊〉 Ne vnques seisi que Dower la puit But to say the Baron had nothing but 〈◊〉 ment with A. in fée and that A. suruiued c. This by â—â—â— Fée simple confessed makes a good plea. 14. H. 6. 5 6. In action of Dower the tenant said â—e was seised till by the Baron disseised vpon whom he re-entred Iudgement c. the Demandant said that before this tenant had any thing in the land W. being seised in Fée infeoffed her husband issâ—â—t seisi c. and she prâ—â—â—â— to be endowed per Martiâ— the replication is not good â—â—â— this might â—e before the Disseisin and before couerture too and if so then the Baron Ne vnques seisi que Dower la puâ—â— That yée may yet perceiue further how 〈◊〉 a point it is to take or relinquish this plea rightly marâ—â— well the case 30. H. 8. Dyer fol. 41. In a Writ of Dower the issue was Ne vnques
husband till his death then by his death the widdow is made sole Tenant of them so little needing either assignation or other circumstance that without new entry claime or challenge shee may haue action of her owne possession against any other that shall enter If the husband aliened intirely any lease for yéeres of his wiues it is gone irreuocable and if hee make no sale and the wife dyes hee shall haue the leafe except shee bee ioyntly possest with another and the seruing ioyntenant shall haue Commentar vpon Fitzherbert 185. If he aliened part of the estate as for ten yéeres next ensuing where the terme was for twenty the widdow may enter when ten yéeres expired But sée in that Case that if the husband rested a rent and dyes the Executors of the husband shall haue the rent for it was not incident to the reuersion yet the wife shall haue the resioue of the terme Sir Edw. Cokes Commentar vpon Fitzherbert fol. 57. b. if he aliened for the ten last yéeres shee may continue possession till those ten yéeres be commenced If the husband deuise away by his last Testament a terme for yéeres which he hath by right of his wife I suppose the deuise is â—â—id as well as if it were made of some higher estate as it appeares by Perkins chap. Dâ—â—â—ses and Plowd 419 in Bra 〈…〉 gâ—â— case And the Law is all one in all respects where the Baron and Feme are possessed of lease for yeares by intâ—eâ—ties that if the estate be made to them during their couerture or by moyties that is to them ioyntly before marriage or where the Baron is possessed of a lease iure vxoris Sée Dame Haâ—â— case Plowd 260. And if the Baron possest of a lease for yeares in the right of his wife charge the land with a rent and die the rent is gone Plowd 4â—8 in Bracebridges case for shee is remitted And if Feine Gardian in Socrage be and her Baron alienateth it and die the wife may enter And sée Dyer 8. Eliz. 25 the same is of Coppy holds per 〈…〉 der to the vse of a Feme for yeares the wife die the estate rests in the husband without a custome be to the contrary If an husband be possest of a terme for yeares in the right of his wife and Iudgement is had against him and the terme is extended and the husband dieth it shall be good against the wife as appeares by Sir Edw. Cokes 8 Rep. 96. in Maâ—â—ing case And see the 9. case of 50 E. 3. lib. Ass note Sir Edw. Cokes Rep. in â—ulwoods case and Plowd 26â— in Damè Hales casâ— where a lease made to Baron and Feme is extended for the debt of the King after the wiues drath If a man possest of a te me deuiseth it to one for his life the remainder to a woman for her life who takes an husband the husband may release that to the particular tenant although it be but a possibilitie Sir Edw. Cokes 10. Rep. 47. Lampeâ—â—s case And if a woman hath a lease for yeares as Executâ—iâ— and takes an husband hée may sell it per â—oâ— curi 〈…〉 pr 〈…〉 r Fitzherbert Dyer â—8 H. 8. 7. A woman hath a terme 〈…〉 trir the husband s 〈…〉 wits to 〈…〉 vâ—â—n which a moytie is awarded to the pretendor of the title the wife is bound thereby but because the defendant in detinue brought by the wife for the Indenture of lease plead non dâ—tinet and not the speciall matter Iudgement was against him Dyer 2. E 〈…〉 183. 21. H. 7. 6. agrees If the husband discontinue the Franck tenement of his wife the apt instrument whereby to recouer it when she is a widdow is a Cu 〈…〉 vita Which though it be not so necessarie and néedfull perhaps since the Statute of 32. which disableth husbands to discontinue as it was before yet I. perceiue not by what reason the vse of it is forbidden euen in those cases where the entrie is â—ongeable for the vertue of the Writ is not decayed by lawfulnesse of the entrie neither doth free libertie to take possession prohibit the resort to Iustice and action at Law when perhaps a woman cannot or dares not enter By Common Law therefore if the Baron alien in fée the heritage of his wife or her Francktenement by Feoffment or by Demise for terme of life or in taile she may haue remedy after his decease by this Writ Of which the generall forme is Praecipe A. quod â—â—d â—â—â— Bâ—quae fuit vxor Câ—â—â—um messuagium 〈…〉 quod clamat esse ius hereditat suam Et in quod A. noâ— habet ingressum nisi per C. quondam virum c qui illud â—â— de 〈…〉 isit cui in vita contradicere non pot 〈…〉 Th 〈…〉 may be in the per â—ui and post and some varietie it hath according to title of the Demandant as Quâ—â—â— clamat 〈…〉 ius haereditatem or Vt ius maritagium or Vt ius exâ—onâ— I. qui ipsaâ— B. C. virum suum feofavit in quo c. or Quam clamat tenere sibi haeredibusde corpore suo de 〈◊〉 C. quondam viri sui exâ—untibus â—â— d 〈…〉 ne I. or Quam clamat essâ— dotem suam ex dono E. pri 〈…〉 vel secundi c. If Baron and Feme lose the wiues landâ— by de 〈…〉 shée may haue this Writ when shee is a widdow But if the wiues lands be recouered in a Cessauit perâ—de 〈…〉 â—â— Baron and Feme vpon a C 〈…〉 during esp 〈…〉 shall neuer haue a Cuâ—â—â— vita 4. Ed. 2. If Baron and Feme and a third person being Ioyntenants in Fée the Baron alien the intiertie and die his widdow shall haue a Cui in vita of a inoytie during the life of the third person for it séemed the alienation was a seuerance of Ioynture saith Fitzherbert But hée sends vs to 36. Ed. 3. in his Abridgement titulo Cui in vita By which booke the wife in this case cannot haue a Cui in vita for any part so long as the third person suruiueth because they two may ioyne in a Writ of right and if hee die she may haue a Cui in vita of all Vide Librum Of lands which a man and woman purchase ioyntly before couerture the Cui in vita shall be but of a inoytie but of lands purchased ioyntly during coâ—eâ—â—ure the Cui in vita is of the in 〈…〉 e and being brought of a inoytie the Writ is not good 39. H. 6. 45. for in the one case they are seised by inoyties in the other by intireties A woman by excepting lands which she and her late husband tooke in exchange or by excepting rent reserued out of it shall be bâ—â—â—ed in a Cui in vita or any other action Fitzherbert and â—6 Ed. 4. 8. Idem ius if shée accept parcell â—â— her owne land in Dower but 17. Assisarum pl. 3. Brooke 24. Cui in
the husbands Ancestors that they should doe nothing preiudiciall to the heires But in this case there came no Ioynture from the husband but contrariwise the wife had made a Ioynture to her husband and after his decease to bridle the woman to doe what shée listed with her owne inheritance were against all reason and as farre from any affinitie with 11. H. 7. as it should be when a woman seised in Fée simple giues lands to the father of him whom she intends to marrie to the intent that he regrant this land to his sonne and her after marriage with a remainder in taile c. to restraine her when after marriage regranting and death of the husband she should leuie a fine to other vses or suffer a recouerie which case though it be cleane out of the Statute yet it is within the words for the â—oynture was made by the Barons Ancestor though not originally c. And so note those two cases of Plowd one is taken to be within the intent though out of the letter and the other though within the letter yet out of the intent and yet both constructions most reasonable and iust And see Sir George Brownes case Sir Edw. Cokes â— Râ—p that a lease made by a woinaâ— tâ—nant in taâ—le of the gift of her husband c. make a lease for thrée liâ—sâ— that is not warranted by the Statute of 32. H. 8 and although the lease be without clause of Warrantie yet it is within the Statute of 11. H. 7. for those words in the act with warrantie refer to releases and confirmations which makes no discontinuance without warrantie for the inteâ—t of the Act is to proâ—ibit not onely euerie barre but â—ueriâ— manner of discontinuance which puts the heire to his reall action And in that case it was resolued that if the issue in taile had before the womans for feiture granted his remainder onely in that case hee by the exâ—resse letter of the Act shall enter vpon the discontinuance of the woman for his act doth not biâ—de his estate But when the issue in taile leuie a fine with praclamation in the life of the woman tenant in taile c. that shall binde the taile and therefore there the Conusée shall enter for hée which hath the immediate title interest or inheritance at the time of the for feiture shall enter by that Statute And it was said by Anderson Chiefe Iustice of the Common Pleas that where it was inâ—ented for to makâ— euaâ—â—â—ne out of the Statute that if such a woman tenant in taile accepts a fine sur conusans de droit come câ—o c. and by grant and renders the land for a thâ—usand yeares that is an alienâ—tion within the intention of the Act although the words of the Act are discontinuance aliâ—nation c. and of that opinion was Wâ—ay Chiefe Iustice and Dyer and all the Court of Commoâ— Pleas was of the same opinion 18. Eliz. And in Sir Edw. â—okes 3. Rep. Lincolne College case It was resolued that if the heire in taile conuey the lands to others and the woman tenant in taile release or maks conâ—â—râ—nation with waâ—rantie which is not but to perfect and corroborate the estate which the heire in taile hath made such a warrantie is not restrained by the said Act for that which the woman hath done is for the benefit of the heire and not for his preiudice and by his aâ—â—ent And she and the heirâ—â—â—ight haue iâ—yned a fine and so barre the estate taile not with standing the Statute of 11. H. 7. therefore such Acts by the woman shall not be void to grant the hâ—ire or any else any aduantage by the Statute of 11. H. 7. And note the opinion of Sir Edw. Coke in the said case of Lincolne College that the sonne borne after shall by this Statute out the daughter who entred for forfeiture and â—â—ewâ—â— other opinions concurring yâ—â— in Dyer 21. Eliz. 362. the heire in such a case is said to be in by purchass And note Reader that it hath â—â—â—ne adiudged that although the Déed of conueyance and assurance of the womans Ioynture or estate dâ—therpresse her marriage portion as well as her marriage to â—e the cause and consideration of such Ioynâ—urâ— or â—statâ— yet if the estate prâ—â—éds from the husband or his Ancestors she is within the said â—tatute of 11. H. 7. and sâ—e Villers and Beauâ—â—â—ritâ— case 4. Mar. 146. But â—â—â—uâ—râ— if the portion money appeare to be the full price of the land if that differ not the case Sée Sir Edw. Cokes Comment vpon Littleton 365. These â—ases put a man seised in Fee leuie a fine to the vse of himselfe for life and after to the vse of his wife and of the heires males of her body by him begotten and had issue male and after he and his wife leuied a fine and suffered a common recouerie the husband and the wife died and the issue male entred by the Statute of 11. H. 7. and the entrie was â—olden lawfull and yet this caâ—e is out of the letter of the Statute for she neither leuied the fine c. being sale or with any other saue her husband who made the Ioâ—â—ture Sed qui â—aeret iâ— littera â—aeret in cortice and therefore this case being within the 〈◊〉 of the Statute is within the remedy But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that this case was deâ—yed for Law by the Râ—â—â—rder oâ— London in his argument in the case hereunder 〈◊〉 betweene Copland and Pyat Another case in Sir 〈◊〉 Cokes Commentaries vpon Littleton which agrée with Eiston and Studs case in Plowd is A man seised of land â—ure vâ—oris and they two leuie a fine and the 〈◊〉 grant and render the land to the hâ—sband and wife in speciall taile the remainder to the right heires of the wiâ—â— they haue issue the husband dieth the wife taketh another husband and they two leuie a â—â—ne in Fée the issue entreth this is within the letter of the Statute and yet is out of the meaning because the state of the land 〈◊〉 from the wife so as it was the purchase of the husband in letter and not in meaning But where the woman in â—â—nant for life by the gift or conueyance of any other â—â—â— alienation with Warrantie shall binde the heire at this day The case of Copland and Pyaâ— adiudged Hillar 7. Car. in Banâ—â— Regis in effect was thus I. S. his sonne was to marrie to the daughter â—â— I. N. And the Deed 〈◊〉 that I. N. for thâ— consideration of foure hundred 〈◊〉 paid by I. S. and of a marriage c and for the 〈◊〉 of the bloâ—â— of I. N. coâ—enants to stand seised to the vse of the sonne â—â— I. S. and his daughter whom the 〈◊〉 of I. S. should marrie â—â—taile the remainder to another 〈◊〉 of I. N. thâ— remainder to the hâ—ires of I. N. 〈◊〉 dieth hauing issue and the wife alieneth by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was resolued that it was not within
to make void the Obligation or Statute if there be cause with a seuere penalty of 300. li to bee forfeited by the Sheriffe if hee did not execute she same Writ duly according to the tenure thereof This Statute was too méeke and gentle something like him that made it H. 6. SECT XXVII 3. H. 7. c. 2. BVt 3. Hen 7. cap. 2. beginning with a better complaint against takers for lucre of maids widdowes or wiues hauing substance of lands or goods or being heires apparant which takers sometimes married them and sometime desâ—owred them to the breach of Gods Law and the Kings the disparagement of such women and vtter heauinesse and discomfort of their friends ordaineth that whosoeuer taketh against her will vnlawfully any maid widdow or wife shall together with the procurors abbetters and receiuers of any such women knowing her to bee so taken against her will bee felous and euery of them béene reputed and iudged as felons principall But this extendeth not to taking where a woman is claimed as a ward or bondwoman And Mr. Lambard noteth that anno 3. 4. Phil. Mar. this Statute was construed to make no felony vnlesse the woman married were either taken or deslowred SECT XXVIII 4. 5. Phi. Mar. cap. 8. THerefore to supply what hitherto was wanting against takers and also intisers rauishing by allurements and flatterers 4. 5. Phil. Mar. cap. 8. saith that for want of sufficient Law it remained still a famlâ—ar and common mischiefe in the Realme That maidens and women children of Noble men Gentlemen and others which were heires apparant or had lands in great substance left by their Ancestors or friends by flattery trifling gifts or faire promises of light persons and also by subtility of such as bought and sold them for reward were many times allured to contract matrimony with vnthrifty persons and thereupon oftentimes with sleight or force were taken from their parents friends or kinsâ—olke to the high displeasure of God the disparagement of the children and perpetuall condolence of their friends Therefore it is ordained that it shall not bee lawfull to conuey any maid or woman child vnmarried or vnder the age of sixteene yéeres out of the possession and against the will of her father or of such person to whom by his will or otherwise in his life time he shall haue appointed the kéeping education and gouernance of her except such taking as shall bee without fraud by the Master or Mistris or Gardian in Soâ—age or in Chiualry of or to such maid or woman child And if any person that is aboue the age of fourtéene yéeres shall conuey or cause to bee conueyed any such maid being within the age of sixtéene yéeres out of the possession and against the will of the father or mother or any other person which then shall haue by lawfull meanes the order keeping education or gouernance of her the offender duly attainted or conuicted other than such of whom shee shall hold by knights seruice shall suffer two yéeres imprisonment without baile or mainprise or par such fine as shall bee assesed by the Quéenes Councell in the Starchamber And if any shall take away and deflowre any such maid or woman child or shall against the will of her father or he not knowing if the father be in life or without the assent or knowledge of the mother hauing â—ustody â—nd gouernance of the child the father being dead by letters messages or otherwise contract matrimony with any such mard except it bee by the consent of the person or persons by interest of wardship intituled to haue the marriage he shall suffer being lawfully conâ—â—ted fiue yéeres imprisonment without baile or maineprise and pay such fine as shall bee assessed in the Starrechamber c. the one moity of all which fines shall bee to the Quâ—â—e and her successors and the other to the grieued And the Councell in Starrechamber by Bill of complaint or information and Instices of assise by inquisition or indictment in which processe shall be awarded as inditements of trespasse at tâ—e Common law haue authority to heare and determine the offen â—s Moreouer if any woman child or maidâ—n being aboue the age of twelue yéeres and vnder sixteene doe at any time consent to such person as shall make contract of matrimony contrary to the forme of this Statute the next of kin to whom the inheritance should come after her death shall from time of such assent haue and enâ—oy all such lands tenements and her editaments as shee had in possession reuersion or reâ—â—â—nder at the time of assent during the lâ—te of such peâ—son so contracting matrimâ—ny and after her â—â—cease so contracting c. then the said lands shalldescen reâ—eâ—â— remaine and â—ome to such person or persons other than tâ— him that shall so contract matrimony as they should haue done in case this Statute had neuer beenâ—mâ—deâ— But thâ—s At extenâ—eth not â—o diâ—â—â—sh any libeâ—ty custome or authorite in London or like corporations as touching Orphancs their lands goods or chattels Sée Ratcliffs Case in Sir Edward Cokes 3. Rep. fol. 38. vpon this Statute of 4. and 5. of Phil. and Mar. In an Eiectione firme vpon speciall pleading a speciall verdiâ—t was thus in effect that William Wilcokes married the daughter and heâ—re apparant of Iohn Edols and Alice his wife and hath issue by her Iohn Elizabeth and Martha William Wilcokes afterwards by his will in wrighting appoints the order custody education and gouernment of his said three children to their said grandfather and grandmother during the grandfather and grandmothers liues and then dyes the widdow of Wilcokeâ— marrieth Raphe Radcliffe Iohn Edois dyes and his widdow being Tenant in â—ee simple of the lands in question holden in soccage by her will deniseth them to her grandchild Iohn Wilcokes in taile the remainder to Elizabeth and Mortha and the heircs of their two bodies equally to bee diuided the remainder in fee to her said daughter and heire apparant the mother of these thrée deuisées and dieth Iohn Wilcoke dieth without issue his sister Elizabeth married one Andrewes and he his wife and her sister Marthâ— enter the lands and were seised accordingly and Marâ—ha abiding with Raph Râ—tclâ—ffe and his wife being aboue fourtéene and vnder sixtéene yéeres of age with Raph Râ—tâ—lâ—ffe his consent and of her owne accord departs eight miles off from them where six houres after shee was married to Edward Raâ—cliffâ— who enters and made the Plaintisâ—e his lease And the issue being whether Elizabeth Ratcliffe the wife of Raph Ratcliffe had the custody of Martha the wife of Edward Râ—tcliffe the lessor at the time of their contract and marriage all the Iudges and Coâ—rt of Kings Bench resolued that Elizâ—beth had the gouernance of her daughter Martha at the time of her contract and marriage within the intent and meaning of the Statute It was resolued in that case that those words father mother within the
45. Edw. 3. is contra But severall tenancy or non-tenure is no plea in a Nuper obiit for the priuity of blood But a sister may claime by purchase and disclaime in the blood and this is a good plea. If one coparcener die leauing issue a sonne which sonne infeoffeth a woman in all the land c. then marrieth her now cannot the other percener haue a Nuper obiit against the baron feme But she may haue a mordancestor in her owne name and in the name of the seisure which the father had the day of his death for that amounteth to a dying seised see Novel nat br 197. c. SECT XVII Of the writ of right de rationabili parte THere is also another Writ called a writ de recto de rationabili parte that neuer lieth but betwixt priuies in bléed as betwixt brothers in gavell kinde or betwixt sisters nephewes nieces c. It is also for lands in fée simple as where the ancestor leaseth land for tearme of life and dieth having two daughters and after the death of tenant for life one of the daughters entreth into the whole inheritance and deforceth her sister the deforced may haue this Writ it is maintenable by two or thrée sisters against the fourth or by an aunt or niece against a sister that deforceth and this writ lieth as wel where the ancestor dyed seised as where he died not seised It is in nature a writ of droit patent must be directed to the Lord of whom the land is holden from before whoÌ„ it is remoueable by a Tolt as the Haught writ is where the ancestor dieth seised and one coheire deforceth another whether it be in gauell kinde or amongst partners at the common law the deforced hath election of this writ or of the nuper obiit But when he died not seised and a coparcener afterward deforceth the Nuper obiit lieth not The forme of this writ is Precipimuâ— to the Lord ut sine dilatione plenum rectum teneas A. de decem acris cum pertinentiiâ— quas clamat esse rationabilem parteÌ„ de libero tenemento quod fuit I. patris vel c. tenere per liberum servititum tertiae partis c. for it must be séene what rent and seruice the whole land yéeldeth to the Lord according there to shall the plaintiffe be rated in his or her writ If after the death of their ancestor two coparceners enter and the one doe then deforce the other of something appendant or appertenent to that which is holden in coparcenery she may haue a writ de rationabili parâ—e of this appendant or appertenent which shall say quod clamat tenere ad liberum tenementum If a man dying seised of lands intailed haue two daughters whereof the one entereth and deforceth the other the remedy is by formedon and neither by Nuper obiit or Rationabili parte If a sister aunt niece or cousin claime from her ancestor by feofment in fée one which should haue bin coparcener had the feofment not bin deforceth her she may haue a writ of Droit patent and joine the mise by battaile or graund assise come semble saith Fitzherbert because shée claimeth not as heire But where there is no impediment intaile feoffement or such thing all the partners deforced bring a rationabili parte against all the copartners terre-tenants for so it must bée and the heire of an heire may sue for part of the seisin of the coÌ„mon ancestor there battail or grand assise voucher or view lie not neither is noÌ„tenure any plea for the writ lieth only betwéen privies in blood finally the demand in this writ must bée of a portion certaine as of x. acres if xx discend to two sisters and the demandant if she recouer shall haue iudgement of so many to hold in seueralty SECT XVIII Of Partition NOw of Partition it may be made in diuers maners as first for example by agréement amongst two copartners or more which accord to diuide the inheritance into certaine parts of equall valew to bee holden in severalty and alwaies the part which the elder hath is called Ini ia pars though in this kinde of partition there bee no prerogatiue of primer election giuen to the eldest Another manner of partition is where they cause certaine friends to make the parts or diuision here the eldest shall first chuse then the next eldest and so succéedingly If by their whole agréement the eldest make the diuision it is said saith M. Littleton that she shall last make election which is as much to say say I as she shall haue none election at all Littleton hath another maner of alotment wherein after partition made of the lands euery part being written in a seroule and lapped vp in a bale of wax is put into a bonnet which must be holden by some indifferent body and then as wee use to choose Valintines euery partner pulleth out a part the first borne first the rest after her in degrée of ancientry and euery one shal hold her to her chance Also partition may be made in Chancery as when one copartner of full age and another remaineth in ward to the King c. in such case if she which resteth in ward at full age haue not her full part she may sue a writ of partition or Scire facias vpon the record returnable in Chancery to shew why a new partition shall not be made and partition may be of a reversion or of an aduowson Of a reuersion thus that A. shall haue reuersion of such such lands B. the reuersion of such other laÌ„ds of an aduowson that A. shall haue euery 2. 3. or 4. auoidance c. this is good without deed where partition is made of a mannor without mention of the aduowson it remaineth in common sée that case of aduowson and partition of aduowson 2. Hen. 7. 5. a. Partition by agréement of parceners is good in law aswell by paroll as by writing and if vnto two copartners there doe descend two houses whereof the one is worth xx s. and the other x. s. annually the best house may bee allotted to one copartner and she and her heires to pay to the other and her heires for owelty or equalities sake v. s. rent issuing out of her house and all this is good without writing so that the partner that shall haue this rent and her heires may distraine for the same when it shal be arere of common right in whose hands soeuer the house charged shall come and this shall be a rent charge of Common right had and receiued for equality of partition Fitzherb fol. 252. Plow 134. Partition of lands that one partner and her heires shall haue and hold them from Easter to the gule of August alone and by her selfe and the other and her heyres from August till Easter in the like manner was awarded a good partition in the time of Ed. 2.
it selfe should be deliuered to a Lay-man altogether vnlettered which should distribute to euery coheyre her part at aduenture wherwith she should stand contented But this might be otherwise by their agréement amongst themselues to elect according to the prerogatiue of their age Bracton discendeth déeper into examination what things may be parted amongst coheyres exempting neither lands tenements homages villinages seruices seruitudes or anything belonging to lands and tenements from diuision vnlesse it be seriantia quae diuidi non debent ne cogatur-Rex seruitium accipere per particulas or a castle or the head of some Earldome or Barrony quod propter ius gladij diuidinon debet sit illud castrum vel aliud edificium hoc ideo saith he ne sic caput perplures particulas diuidatur plura iura comitatus Baroniarum deueniunt ad per nihilum quod deficiat regnum quod ex comitatibus Baronijs dicitur esse constitutum Therfore Caput comitatus vel Baroniae resteth indiuisible and shall go to the eldest copartner though where there are many chiefe and great Mansion-houses euery one may haue one perhaps and if there be but one euery one may haue part thereof where the frank-tenement is holden by seruice militarie for if a frée soke-man die whose heritage it is ab antiquo partibilis the eldest son by Bracton shall haue his house and the rest shall haue allowance Amongst other things Bracton standeth long vpon the bringing to a common heape which we call Hotchpot Lands giuen in marriage to a coheyre shewing that though lands giuen in marriage whether the Inheritance be discendens or perquisita and whether shee to whom the land is giuen be at the time of the gift a maid or a widow must needs fall into partition when part of the other lands is claimed hoc quamuis homagium interuenerit post tertium haeredem yet for all that she to whom there is giuen in marriage already more then an euen portion may well retaine it and is not compellable to any confusion vnlesse she demand a share in that which remaineth so that she to whom all is giuen may likewise retaine all And where a daughter was infeoffed pro homagio seruitio or where a stranger was infeoffed of part of the inheritance which afterwards married a daughter c. they might be made parcell of the other lands without any Hotch-pott of these things ye may read more in Bract. li. 2. c. 33 and 34 with a Writt of habere facias seisinam for he saith possessio non pertinet ad haeredes nisi naturaliter fuerit apprehensa animo et corpore proprio vel alieno sicut procreatorio prius ad ipsos non pertinebit vnde cum in curia Regis facta fuerit partitio statim habeanâ— breue de seisma sua habenda SECT XX. of Hotch pott according to Littleton FOr putting of lands in Hotch-pot there is no where so full and plaine learning as in M. Littl. third booke c. z. If saith he a man seised in fée-simple lands hauing issue two daughters of which the eldest is married giue parcell of those lands to his daughter and her husband in franke-marriage and die seised of other lands excéeding in value those which are giuen c. the husband and wife shall haue no part of this remnant vnlesse they will put the land giuen vnto them in Hotch-pot for example If the father had 30. acres and gaue 10. now after his decease if the donées refuse to make commixtion the other daughter may enter and occupie the whole 20. and hold it to her selfe But putting all in Hotch-pott to finde the intire value for it is but an estimation or valuation finding the acres to bee of like goodnesse the Donées in franke-marriage shall haue an nâ—reasement of 5. acres to hold all 15. in seueraltie so that alwayes the land giuen in frank marriage must remaine to the donées and their heyres for else saith Littleton should follow a thing vnreasonable and inconuenient which alwayes the Law detesteth there is the same Lawes betwixt the heyres of Donées in frank marriage and the other partners if the Donées themselues die before their ancestor or before partition This putting of Land in hotchpot is where the other lands descend from the Donor onely and not from any other auncestor for if they descend from the father or brother of the donour from the mother of the Donée that which is equallie so discended shall be without Commixtion equally diuided Also by Littleton if the land descended be of equall valew with the land giuen in franke Marriage Hotchpot should be then in vaine and to no purpose and sée Littl. Chapter of parceners more concerning such Hotchpot How partition may be auoyded PArtition made betwixt two Sisters tenants in fée simple they both being of full age is not defesable though there want oweltie and equall valew in their parts But if the land were in fée-taile the parties making the partition should bee bound and concluded onely for their time the issue of her which had the meaner value might enter after her mothers death into her Aunts part and occupie with her in common and she againe with her niece in the part alotted to her Sister If two Coparceners in fée both married together with their husbands make partition it shall stand in force during the coverture but after the death of a husband his wife hauing a meaner part may enter and defeat the partition not so if at the time of the alotment the parts were both of equall annuall valew If two Coparceners whereof the one is vnder 21. yeares age make partition so that a meaner valew is allotted to the puisne partner she may enter and defeat the partition either in her minoritie or when she is of full age but let her take héed when shée commeth once to full age that shée take not the whole profit of that which to her selfe was alotted for that is an agréement to the partition and maketh it indefeasable peraduenture a moietie of the profits she may take Thrée acres of land are giuen to one in taile which hath other thrée in fée and after his death his two daughters make partition so that one hath the land intailed and another the land in fée if shée which hath the fée-simple alien her part and die her issue may enter into the land tailed and hold occupation in Common with her Aunt whose folly was to make such a partition for since shee is without remedie against the alienée of her mother and without recompence for the lands intailed whereunto she is an heyre by descent from the first Donée it is reason she may enter specially considering that the state taile is not discontinued yet 20. Hen. 6. it is holden that she is put to her Formedon A man seised of two carues of land one by iust title another by disseisin of an infant dieth seised hauing issue two daughters they diuide
demand made of the rent by her husband hee shall haue Courtesie in the rent notwithstanding So it is if an Advouson in grosse descend to a woman married hauing Issue c. though she die afore auoydance the husband shall present and though the Bishop after the descent present by lapse yet the husband shall haue the second presentment for there cannot in these things possession be taken maintenant and at all times as they be in Lands And take with you here these Cases out of Dier 1. Ma. fo 95. Tenant per Cheualrie in cap. dieth his Daughter and Heyre being vnder age office is found and the King grants the wardship of body and Land to me which marrieth the ward and hath Issue by her and after shee accomplisheth the age of sixetéene yeares and the King is satisfied for the two yeares profit they tender a generall liuerie and before it be past the Wife dieth the Baron shall haue the Courtesie come semble saith the Booke And 6. Eliz. Dier 229. the like descent is to a Daughter and married hauing Issue by her husband and she dieth ten dayes after her Father no Liuery being sued that is found by office the Baron shal be Tenant by the Courtesie and shall sue liuery SECT XLIII No Courtesie of reuersion after estate for life THe seisin must be to the Wife in estate of Inheritance not mangled or cut off from the Frank Tenement and therefore by Parkins where a Woman an Heyre enters after her Fathers death and being seised in fée-simple makes a Lease of her Land to I. S. for terme of his life if she now marry haue Issue and die during the Lease the Husband shall neither be Tenant by the Courtesie of the Land when it reuerts nor of the rents in the meane while Also 8. assi p. 6. If a Daughter and Heyre enter endolâ— den and haue Issue by her and the condition being broken she dyeth if now the Feoffor enter the Feoffée shall not be Tenant per le Curâ—esie of the Seignorie But if a feme sole haue a rent or common in or out of certaine Lands and the Tenant leasseth the Land to a stranger during the life of I. S. and the woman intermarrieth with the Lessée hath Issue and I. S. dyeth now if the wife die the Baron shall haue Courtesie in the rent or Common And if the Tenant leased his ground for 20. yeares and a woman hauing in the ground a rent charge in fée intermarrieth with the Lessée c. dieth during the terme it is a question in Parkins whether the husband shall haue Courtesie in the rent after the terme determine see Parkins cap. By the Courtesie SECT XLVII No Courtesie of a bare vse IF a Woman sole seised c. make a feoffement to the vse of her selfe her heyres and then she marrieth hath Issue and dieth before any estate in the same lands be againe by entry or otherwise executed to her her husband shall not be Tenant by the Courtesie and this aswell after the Statute of 27. H. 8. as before if the Feoffement were since the Statute SECT XLVIII What Husband may be Tenant by the Courtesie and of what estate WHere the Wise is actually seised of Lands in â—éesimple see-taile generall or as Heyre of sée-taile speciall the second Baron may bee Tenant by the Courtesie as well as the first for so is the Maxime And Parkins Fitzherbert and Brooke haue all of them the Case 21. H. 3. viz. A woman Inheritour hath Issue by her Husband and he dieth she takes another Husband hath Issue by him and that Issue dieth the woman dieth her second Husband shall be Tenant by the Courtesie Bracton agréeth also who when hee hath shewed this Ciuilitie of England concludeth Quod dicitur de primo diâ—i poterit de secundo siue de primo viro haeredes apparentes extiterunt siue non plenae aetatis vel minoris But hee addeth Quod iniuriosum est secundum Sâ—ephanum de Segraue qui dicebat quod lex illâ— male â—uit intellecta male vsâ—tata Nam quod dicitur de lege Angliae intelligi debet de primo virâ— communibus haeredibus non de secundo maxime cum haeredes apparentes extiterint de primo My mind giues mee that hee said truth and that Law turning a little out of her Channell here before Iustice Segraues time could neuer since bee brought to her course SECT XLIX Of speciall Taile BEfore West 2. cap. 1. all the Estates which wée now call tailed that is curtailed or cut off were sée-simple Conditionall If Lands had béene giuen to a man and a woman in Franke Marriage or to them and to the Heyres of their two bodies which gifts make now a speciall Taile as soone as they had Issue the Condition was thought to be performed And as a woman suruiuing her first Husband in this case might alien the Land so might she by bearing a Childe to her second Husband c. this makes him Tenant by the Courtesie be inforced to proue that the Childe sent forth some voyce or cry arguing life and naturall humanity for if it bellowed bleated brayed grunted rored or howled there accrued no courtesie by getting such an vnciuill vrchin By him therefore there must be a naturall crie heard inter quatuor parietes for he saith though a Child be borne mutus surdus tamen clamorem emittere debet sive masculus sit siue foemina nam Dicunt E. vel A. quotquot nascuntur ab Eâ—a E. or A. all crye that from Eue come Though they be borne both deafe and dumbe Non sufficit igitur tantum baptizatus scpultura yâ—t 28. H. 8. Dyer fol. 25. sets downe Fitzherberts opinion that a man may be Tenant by the Courtesie though the Childe neuer crie car paraduenture lissue soit nee dumbe And so saith Parkins 9. 4. 7. viz. that if the issue bee borne aliue though it die before it be heard crie or before it be baptized for that is a matter also with Bracton if there were no lachesse contumacie or contempt in the Baron he may be Tenant by the Courtesie But by negligence or by contempt he shall preiudice himselfe ascuns diont SECT LI. A Childe borne beginneth the title of Courtesie NOw this hauing a Childe is such a matter as it séemeth that maine tenant thereupon the title of Courtesie beginneth for example if a bond woman purchase Land and marrie if the Lord enter before Issue be had no Childe borne afterwards shall make the husband tenant by the Courtesie But if the Baron haue Issue by his wife before the Lords entrie he shall be tenant by the Courtesie and the auourie from that time forward shall rest vpon him solement And the possession in Law if the wife die shall not light vpon the Heyre but vpon the Baron which shall be tenant to euery praecipe Câ—o est cleere lei Brooke out of the Doctor and Student vide Brooke
woman may haue Dower by taking his seruice euery third day and if a mill by taking the third part of the profit and shee shall grinde tole-frée and if a House a woman is Dowable by a Chamber or rent assigned out of the house Note that if such a rent be assigned out of the Land wherein Dower is claimed the woman may haue Assise without Déed contra if it be assigned out of other Land 33. H. 6. fo 2. Also a woman may hold an Aduousan appendent in Dower of the third part of an Aduousan in gros by presenting at euery third auoydance or the third part of the moitie of an Aduousan by presenting at euery sixt auoydance And of a Common in grâ—s which is certaine a woman is Dowable Likewise if any grant to I. S. that hee and his heyres shall take yearely in his Meadow thrée load of Hay c. For Common appendant Parkins saith If a woman accept two acres parcell of a Mannor in allowance of Dower she shall haue no Common appendant aliter if a moitie bee assigned her Eâ— 5. lacobile Countelle of Oxfords case cited in Harpers case Coke 11. Rep. fo 256. Dower shall be of prediall Tythes c. SECT LXI Of what things Dower is not granted OF naked seruices as homage and fealtie there is none endowment nor of a bare annuity granted in fée nor of things vncertaine as of Common without number And if it be granted to I. S. that hee and his heyres shall take so many Estouers in Methold wood as they will burne in c. this will yéeld no Dower no more then a License or grant de coylor bois in auter bois By the old writers if in the first establishment of Dower speciall mention be not made or Aduousons or third presentments the wife cannot haue Dower of any Aduouson pur ceo que aduouson dâ—â—sgly sevest mi departible But when a Mannor with the appurtenances is ordained for Dower if an Aduouson be appendant to the Mannor and the Church become voide after the Husbands death the Wife may present Also by them a woman cannot challenge a Castle chiefe Mease or head of any Baronie or Countie or any thing within the close or Circuit of the chiefe Mease to be assigned her in Dower But for her habitation she may choose aliquod honestum Messuagium de villenagijs that is some bond Tenements within the Mannor-house And where there is none such to choose shee shall haue one clapped vp for her in aliqua platea competenti de commum bosco as long and broad as the third part of her husbands chiefe house A cottage of clay and splints set close in a corner of a cold Common which is but a rewmaticke Lodge to welcome Suitors to But how if the Common and all things bee so inclosed that there is not roome to swing a Cat in women are not put in Rogum with their Husbands any where but in the Indies and I thinke that custome is left there also by this time If there be neither base tenement nor wood nor ground wherewith whereon to build a Widowes habitacle she may bee endowed for necessity of the principall Messuage and without necessity alwayes if the heyre be so contented The reasons which Breton and Bracton doe expresly alleadge for nicenesse of Law making dainty in their time to endow Widdowes in Aduousons and great Messuages is onely the indiuiduity or impartablenes of the things Of an Aduouson because it is but ius quoddam and not corporall and great houses c. for the dignity and strength which the Realme was thought to haue by their conseruation But considering that the end of Dower is chiefly the maintenance of a Wife Si vir premoriatur it may further bee colourably said that Law at first did neuer meane to trouble Widdowes with presenting of Clarkes for that either is not or ought not to bee a matter lucratiue or of gaine though indeede Bracton prize a Benefice of an hundred Markes at one hundred Shillings valew SECT LXII Of what estate of Inheritance the Husband must bee seised THe Learning here is not discrepant from that which went before in title of Courtesie Of fée or fée-taile generall a Woman shall haue Dower so shall she of fée-farme or of a base fée-simple but not of Coppy-hold vnlesse the Custome serue for it And if Tenant for life make a feoffement in fée the wife can haue no Dower 3. H. 4. fo 6. The which Littl. inserteth in this Chapter of Dower viz. where the Husband is seised as heyre of speciall taile c. is no interdiction of Dower in all cases to her which is married to the Donée of speciall taile Littletons own example is That if Lands be giuen to a man and the heyres which he shall ingender of his wife Alice if he dies Alice shall be endowed of this estate for no Issue of a second wife could be heyre of speciall taile and that makes the difference The case 41. E. 3 fo 30. is this A man seised in generall taile by fine made a feoffement and tooke backe an estate in speciall Taile to himselfe and his first Wife and died the King seise by Tenure in capite and endowed the second wife the Issue of the first Wife came shewing the speciall taile and by scire facias against the Wife recouered for default she tooke a second Husband who with his wife brought a quod ei deforceat against the Heyre and hee pleaded the speciall taile the woman by remitting the heyre to the ancient taile would haue concluded him to say that her husband was seised of any other estate Et non allocatur Parkins makes this case somewhat more austere against Dower for as he putteth it fo 60. the Issue is sonne to the Woman which claimeth Dower yet the mother by him not Dowable because the sonne though hee be Heyre is in of another estate then that which was in the Baron during Couerture so likewise 44. Ed. 3. fo 26. in a Writ of Dower against the Heyre Tenant hee sheweth that the band was giuen by fine to his father and mother in speciall taile and that afterwards his father mother discontinued the taile by fine to a stranger and taking backe an estate in generall taile they had Issue this heyre then his mother dyed and the father taking the demandant to wife he died so the sonne was now in per lun taile per lauter and being adiudged in his eigne right by remitter the wife was barred of dower this Case in my conceit fringeth the generality of Littletons rule for the Issue which by possibility the second wife might haue had might by possibility haue inherited though not indefeisably in such estate as was in the Husband during Couerture To conclude where Lands are giuen to the Baron and feme in speciall taile the remainder to the Heyres of the body of the Baron and the Wife dies without Issue there a
second wife may be endowed for after the death of the first wife the remainder in generall taile vesteth maine tenant and is executed 50. Ed. 3. fo 4. Newton saith 7. He. 6. fo 11. if a man make a lease for yeares with Condition if the Lease pay an hundred pound at the end of the terme that then he shall haue fée etsi nemy que il auera que terme that in this Case by paying an hundred pound at the end of the terme the termer shall haue fée from the beginning and his wife is Dowable quere for it seemeth tunc hath relation but ad tempus solutionis If Tenant in Dower lease her estate to the Heyre for her life and the Heyre dieth his wife shall bee endowed notwithstanding the life of the first dowager 45. Ed. 3. fo 13. In action of Dower the tenant shewed that Tenant per Courtesie granted his estate to him in the reuersion rendring rent with clause of re-entry for non-payment he in the reuersion marry the demandant the tenant per le Courtesie re-entreth for the Condition he in the reuersion died his wife was barred Dower for the surrender might well be vpon Condition 14. E. 4. fo 6. SECT LXIII Where Dower is giuen or not giuen of an estate determined VVHere the Husbands estate is loyally enuicted or determined Dower for the most part faileth As thus two men make exchanging of two acres executed in fée one of them dieth his sonne takes a wife and entreth and the otherpartie being impleaded voucheth the sonne which entreth into warrantie so that the Tenant recouereth in value the acre which he deliuered in exchange the sonnes wife shall neuer be endowed of this acre for the title of recouerie in value is from time of the exchange by way of relation and so before the Marriage Likewise if two Copartners in gauell kinde make partition one of them marrieth and the other being impleaded prayeth ayde of his partner which ioyneth c. if the demandant recouer and the Tenant haue pro rata of the partners part which afterward dieth his wife shall not haue Dower of that which is recouered for the title of recouery pro rata is from the death of the common Ancestor saith Parkins As a Villeine takes a wife purchases lands in fée his Lord enters the Villeine dieth his wife shall haue Dower for the Lords title begun by his entrie and the wiues by seisen in the husband the Tenant alieneth in Mortmaine or erecteth a crosse sée thereof W. 2. c. 33. and the Lordentreth the tenants wife shall haue Dower notwithstanding So if the Lord recouer in a Cessauit the tenants wife shall be endowed yet if the tenant had made part and brought a writ of Dower it came to issue ne vnques seisie c. The Iury found the speciall matter and being asked what they thought of it they answered because there was neuer any permanent seisin in the husband that she was not Dowable Your thinking said Iustice Thorpe is contrary to your verdict for here was a possession whereof she is Dowable Et ceo fuit opinion de toutes Littleton also séemeth to be against me in Estate sur condition but it is not ipse dixit but plusiors on t dit Therefore if hee were aliue I might perhaps intreate him to bee on my side SECT LXIV How much and how a woman shall hold in Dower THe Common Law alloweth for Dower the third part of that whereof the Husband during Couerture had such seisin as is before declared to haue and hold if it be in lands by limits and bounds But this Indowment per metes bonds cannot be where the husband is Tenant in Common If one of two Copartners in gauell kinde take a wife and die before partition made the Heyre may assigne his mother a third part of his moity to hold in Common or he may first make partition and then endow her per metes bonds Generally when a woman recouers Dower the Sheriffe shall put her in possession per metes bonds and it hath beene holden that wheresoeuer the heyre assigneth Dower a third part per mi per tout to occupie in Common if the widdow accept it accordingly that this should be a good endowment The Law seemeth to be otherwise By Common right Parkins saith a woman shall haue Dower the third auoydance of euery Aduouson and the third part of euery Mannor that was her husbands for if shee take it in another forme by assignment from the Heyre she may suffer preiudice As if a man seised of thrée Mannors takes a wife and grants a rent charge issuing out of all thrée Mannors and dieth now if the wife by assignment of the heyre accept one Mannor in Dower for all the two parts of this Mannor remaine subiect to the distresse of the granter because the woman for the two parts accepted here her Dower in counter comen droit But had shee vpon recouery of Dower béene assigned this Mannor by the Viscount she should haue held all discharged Yet if a married man seised of thrée Aduousons of thrée seuerall Churches grant to I. S. that he shall present to the Church which next becomes voyde and the granter dying his wife recouers in a Writ of Dower against the heyre before auoydance and the Viscount assigneth to her the Aduouson of one Church for all c. if now the Church thus assigned become voyde ascuns diont saith Parkins the grantée shall present and not the woman for she is endowed incounter common droit and I. S. the grantée which is a stranger to the assignement cannot otherwise take aduantage of his grant But in the first Case after assignment of one Mannor by the Viscount the grantée might distraine in the other two Mannors SECT LXV Lesse or more then a third part THough by the Common Law a woman is to haue no lesse then a third part yet if a widdow will be so foolish as to accept a fourth or fift part or moity of her husbands Inheritance assigned in allowance of all his Franke Tenement it is a good assignement And by custome in some seised of three acres in fée marry and die and a stranger which hath but two of these acres entreth by abatement into the third and after hee hath married the Widdow hee infeoffes a stranger of all thrée acres by indenture resexuing vt supra and dieth the rent goeth out of all the acres but if the heyre of the first husband recouer his acre and assigne it to the woman in Dower shee is Dowable also of the rent for indéed it is entirely issuing out of the two other acres And if a man seised of thrée acres in fée make a feoffement of two reseruing rent out of those two acres vt supra the wife hauing the acre which remained in Dower may haue Dower also of the rent reserued quâ—ere saith Parkins car il est incounter le conscience de diuers homes And making
the acres to be of equall value it must needs bee against law also for one acre of three equally vallued or of euery acre one third part is a iust Dower But if the acre vnsold were inferior in value there is both conscience and law for the woman to claime Dower of the two acres or of the rent for a woman must be endowed of the best possession and not according to the number of acres but according to the value of the Inheritance whilst it was the Husbands Therefore if I make a feoffement of my lands and dye and the feoffée builds a house vpon it or otherwise improoues it my wife shall be endowed no otherwise then according to the value of my possession yet if a disseisor or a feoffée sur condition doe edifie the disseisie or feoffor re-entring shall haue the building If being married I make a feoffement and the feoffee ruinateth a house which was vpon the Lands before the feoffement and that was worth foure or fiue pound annually my wife shall be endowed according to the value that the land was of at time of my death because a woman hath no right to possession of Dower before the death of her husband But Parkins dares not let this Case goe without a quaere SECT LXIX Of Dower at the Church doore THe old kind of endowment at the Church Doore commeth now a dayes seldome in vse But for all that I would haue women better learned then to be ignorant of it it is when a man seised in fee-simple being of full age comming to the Church doore to be married doth there affirme affiance and endowe his spouse of all his lands or of part as of halfe or a lesse quantity openly and with certainty the woman thus endowed may enter into her Dower after the husbands death without assignement and this Dower may be at the Church doore in one County of Lands in another County and without déed Parkins sect 217. Vide Plowd in Sharington ca. fo 304. b. it is good without liuery of seisin Et per Shelly 28. H. 8 Dyer fo it may be done within view and the puisne sonne of Land in borow English may not make such a Dower Also a sonne and heyre apparant when he is espoused by consent of his father may endow his wife at the Church doore in part of such lands and tenements as are the Fathers in fee-simple and the sonnes wife after his death the father liuing may enter presently without further assignement into the parcels thus certainly appointed But if shee enter after her husbands death and agrée to any of these endowments ad ostium ecclesiae she is concluded from claiming any other Dower Thus farre Littleton By Bracton none can endowe his wife in this manner vnlesse hee bee Liber homo for in his time if I bee not much deceiued the greatest number of bond-men held in manurance Lands of their Lords which they occupied to the Lords vse and profit in pure villeinage These hauing none other lands could not endow c. Also by Bracton Quis posset dotem constituere sciendum quod tam minor quam maior masculus Cui vxori tam Church doore to be married deliuer the Deed to her shewing her the lands saying his will is she haue them according to the déede if the Baron neuer claime otherwise then in right of his wife that is a good feoftement But he may endow her of his owne lands ad ostium Ecclesiae without déede though the Land be in a forraigne Countie marry when the Dower is of the fathers Land ex assensu there must bee a deed for assent lieth not in auerment 40. Ed. 3. 43. yet this is contrary to Bracton and in old Bookes the consent hath beene tried by proofes Dowment may be good ex consensu matris but as they say now not ex consensu fratris sororis vel consanguinei The assent ought to be at the Church or Church doore yet 2. H. 3. the sonne married against the will of his parents and eight weekes after indowed his wife of his fathers lands ex assensu patris per curiam it was holden good Fitzherbert 199. Of the head of a Baronie or the Capitall Messuage of a Knights fée Dowmente ad ostium c. is not good but it may be of a moity of all such Lands as the Baron shall hereafter purchace in fee or of all such Lands as the Barons mother holdeth in Dower But if the Father lease his Lands for life and the Sonne and Heyre apparant endow his wife ex assensu c. of the reuersion now if the Lessée die the Lessor enter and the sonne die the wife shall not haue Dower because she was not Dowable of the reuersion at the Common Law though it had beene in her husband during couerture so is it if the Father were seised for life or iointly with another in fee But if the father had beene Tenant in taile the endowment by consent had beene good during his life though no conclusion after his death to his Issue or his wife claiming Dower euen as by Election if tenant in taile being himselfe in actuall seisin endow his wife ad ostium Ecclesiae die if his wife enter the Issue may out her and so may hee in the reuersion if issue faile If the Father at time of endowment ex assensu bee seised none otherwise then in his wiues right Yet Parkins argueth hee shall bee bound during his life quaere I haue held young Maides now indeed somewhat long in the old endowments and I would proceed to instruct them in the dower of the new learning iointures I meane for my desire is that they should be able to haue when they are Widdowes a coach or at the least an ambler and some money in their purses But they are of the minde for themselues I perceiue that Themistocles was in for his daughter He desired a man rather without money then money without a man here is a wise adoe yee say I tell you of Dower of the Widdowes estate and God knowes whether ye shall euer haue the grace to be widdowes or no yee would know what belongeth to wiues on then in a good way I haue brought you to the Church doore if ye be not shortly well married I pray God I may FINIS with her Husbands protection and supereminency Now the Law that giueth Dower to her that is able to deserue it and enableth at so greene yeares knoweth well enough that women are at their Husbands commandement If Titus being dead haue left his wife her maidenhead immunis a culpa a poena immunis erit This I might dilate as in probabilitie or likelinesse of reason at Common Law but it seemeth the matter resteth otherwise determinable For in action of Dower the Tenant shall not plead nunquam carnaliter cognouit nor the demandant be driuen to auerre a knowledge c. But the case may perchance bee drawne to
an issue of ne vnques accople in loyall Matrimonie and that must be tried by the Bishop Therefore for the better direction of Brides take the case verbatim as it is propounded with the solution 22. Eliz. Dyer 369. A woman of full age contracts Matrimonie by words of the present instant with a young man of twelue yeares age and this being solemnized in face of the Church with consummation after a sort the young man being put to bed to her died vnder age quaere if the Ordinarie ought to certifie an accomplement in loyall Matrimonie Solutio doctorum quindecem We be all of opinion that she is to be taken for a loyall wife coupled in loyall Matrimony and in question of Dower that the Bishop ought so to certifie for albeit that in other regards these were but Sponsalia de futuro yet in case of Dower and the priuiledge thereof they are extended to Matrimony consummate Et iudicium datum pro dote heere ye say was the Law as cleere as Christall on your side when supper is done dance a while leaue out the long measures till you be in bed get you there quickly and pay the Minstrels tomorrow SECT II. Baron and Feme one person NOw that Matrimony is celebrated and consummate here is so strait a fellowship or rather identitie of person that if a feoffement bee made to a man and his wife iointly with I. S. the Baron Feme take but a moity and in a feoffement to Baron and Feme and I. S. and T. K. they take but a third part and where a feoffement is made to a man and his wife ioyntly they take not seuerall moities as other ioynt Feoffees doe but the Baron and feme take intirely together and in Law they are said to be seised by intierties and there is no halfing betwixt them For if the Baron charge the whole land or part of it with a rent the wife shall hold it discharged after his death and if he sell all or part and die the wife shall recouer all by Writt of cui in vita See 40. assi pla 7. If a Villeine and his Wife purchase land ioyntly the Lord enter and the Villeine die the Feme or her Heyre shall haue the whole Land Eadem lex videtur where the Husband ioynt-purchaser is an Alien borne or attaint in premunire or of fellonie But the booke of Assises goeth not so farre The videtur is Parliament 43. in Brooke where likewise ye shall see it was holden 5. H 7. fo 31. that if T. infeoffe W. and A. his wife afterward it is by Parliament enacted that all estates made by T. to W. shall bée voyde that the feoffement shall be voyd as well towards the wife as towards the Husband because they are but one person in Law and the Feme taketh nothing but by agréement of the husband And vpon the like reason is the case Dyer 3. Eliz. fo 196. Sir Rob. Catline purchase land held in capite to him and his wife and his heyres without licence and the Queene pardons all offences pro quacunque alienatione sibi facta and doth not speake of the wife in the pardon and yet it was allowed in the Exchequer But if the feoffement had beene to W. and I. S. this I. S. should haue held his moity notwithstanding the Parliaments decrée and this seemeth to bee the better opinion though there were in manner equall number to maintaine That if the feoffement were before couerture the Parliament should voyd it for a moity but if it were after couerture it should voyde for no part against the Feme when shee was discouerte leauing to Parliaments their omnipotencie it is cléere the husband cannot seuer the Ioynture betwixt him and his wife as an other Ioynt-tenant may if the Ioynture were made during Couerture because there is then no moity Otherwise it is if the Ioynture were made before the Marriage And if lands be giuen to a man and his wife habendum one moity to the husband and habendum the other moity to the wife now they bee seised of moities as Tenants in Commom But for this I finde no other authority then the opinion of Knightly in Dyer 28. H. 8. 10. b. SECT III. Baron feme cannot infeoffe one another MOreouer this Conglutination of persons in Baron and feme forbiddeth all manner of feoffing or giuing by the one vnto the other for a man cannot giue any thing vnto himselfe therefore 27. H. 8. fo 27. In action of debt vpon an obligation to performe couenants where it passed for the Plaintiffe because the Defendant had not paid annually seauen pound to his wife it is alleaged in arest of Iudgement that the Couenant was impossible in it selfe c. But Chomeley Shelley and Fitzherbert moued the husband to agrée with the Plaintiffe Car le exception sert de riens for although in strict intelligence of Law money and Chattels paid deliuered or giuen to the wife by the husband are still his owne yet a man may giue his wife a paire of hose saith the booke as a man is bound by honesty so he may be bound by red waxe and parchment to finde his wife sustenance and to bee bound to giue her money for her securitie is all one from this Lanthorne I thinke he tooke his light which bound a gentleman of mine acquaintance to giue his Wife the Obligée his Daughter yearely such and so many gâ—wnes Hertles c. And the meaning must bee taken and obserued in the booke of 4. H. 7. fo 4. is another memorable Cause A man was bound to I. S. by obligation to make a sure estate to a woman in certaine tenements within three moneths after his fathers death The Obligor marrieth the woman in his fathers life time and the Matrimony continueth till the three moneths be expired the obligation is forfeited Vauisor said the husband might well haue performed the condition by fine leuied vpon a writt of Couenant brought by a stranger against the Baron and feme Fisher said he might haue performed it by making a Lease vnto a stranger the remainder to the wife quaere of that Vauisors performance had beene good I thinke if there had beene in the beginning a full purpose and intent of intermarriage betwixt the woman and the Obligor But that appeares not and therefore being that hee hath brought himselfe to an impossibility of performance either of words or meaning the Obligée must néeds be allowed the aduantage If the obligation had béene to the woman her selfe the condition by inter-marriage had béene dispensed with for where the Obligee is a cause that the condition cannot be performed the not performing is without penalitie to the Obligor as if in the old dayes I had béene bound to an Abbot that A. should infeoffe him c. before Christmas if A. had presently entred into Religion my bond had presently beene forfeited not so If A. had béene professed vnder the obedience
in fee-simple or fee-taile Sée the Booke 22. H. 6. fo 18. 19. But may the Lord enter vpon the Land during Couerture quaere If a villeine be possessed of certaine goods and the Lord make seisure of them by poll this is sufficient without seisen in fait But if the villeine die before any seisin and ordaine Executors these Executors shall haue his goods 3. H 4. 15. 16. And a Villeine shall retaine goods which hee hath as Executor against his Lord yea hee may bring Action of debt against him as an Executor all to the vâ—â— of the Testator Also if a Feme gardian in soccage marrie with a villeine I take it the Lord shall haue nothing to doe in this gardianship If a Seignioresse of a Mannor marry her bond-man he is made free and where before hee was her footstoole he is now her head and her Seignior here is part of the particularitie SECT VII The Baron may beate his Wife THe rest followeth Iustice Brooke 12. H. 8. fo 4. affirmeth plainly that if a man beat an out-law a traitor a Pagan his villein or his wife it is dispunishable because by the Law Common these persons can haue no action God send Gentle-women better sport or better companie But it seemeth to be very true that there is some kind of castigation which Law permits a Husband to vse for if a woman be threatned by her husband to bee beaten mischieued or slaine Fitzherbert sets downe a Writ which she may sue out of Chancery to compell him to finde surety of honest behauiour toward her and that he shall neither doe nor procure to be done to her marke I pray you any bodily damage otherwise then appertaines to the office of a Husband for lawfull and reasonable correcâ—ion See for this the new Nat. bre fo 80. f. fo 238. f. How farre that extendeth I cannot tell but herein the sere feminine is at no very great disaduantage for first for the lawfulnesse If it be in none other regard lawfull to beat a mans wife then because the poore wench can sue no other action for it I pray why may not the Wife beat the Husband againe what action can he haue if she doe where two tenants in Common be on a horse and one of them will trauell and vse this horse hee may keepe it from his Companion a yeare two or three and so be euen with him so the actionlesse woman beaten by her Husband hath retaliation left to beate him againe if she dare If he come to the Chancery or Iustices in the Country of the peace against her because her recognizance alone will hardly bee taken he were best be bound for her and then if he be beaten the second time let him know the price of it on Gods name SECT VIII That which the Husband hath is his owne BUt the prerogatiue of the Husband is best discerned in his dominion ouer all externe things in which the wife by combination deuesteth her selfe of proprietie in some sort and casteth it vpon her gouernour for here practice euery where agrees with the Theoricke of Law and forcing necessity submits women to the affection thereof whatsoeuer the Husband had before Couerture either in goods or lands it is absolutely his owne the wife hath therein no seisin at all If any thing when hee is married bee giuen him hee taketh it by himselfe distinctly to himselfe If a man haue right and title to enter into Lands and the Tenant enfeoffe the Baron and Feme the wife taketh nothing Dyer fol. 10. The very goods which a man giueth to his wife are still his owne her Chaine her Bracelets her Apparell are all the Good-mans goods If a Woman taketh more Apparell when her husband dyeth then is necessarily for her degree it makes her Executrix de son tort demesne 33. H. 6. A wife how gallant soeuer she be glistereth but in the riches of her husband Executors if such chattels bee giuen to the wife and to a stranger the husband alone is tenant in Common of them with the stranger Secondly the Court did hold cleerely that in Brackbridges Case and such like the immediate inheritance in the Baron did not drowne the interest of the Feme for the one he had in his owne right and the other in his wiues But by an expresse act as by feoffement or grant of a new lease he might haue giuen away the interest of his wife But leauing all to Law the Law shall saue that interest distinct and preserue it And it was holden in this Case that Baron feme might not ioyne in an eiectione firmae with Anticle but he alone might bring his action and the Baron chased to more higher and more reall Writt Also it was holden the Baron might distraine or haue action of debt for a moity of the rent and as I comprehend the end of Brackbridges case a feoffement by Thomas Brackbridge made of the Mannor whereof the Land seised was parcell and might well drowne all interest Executory which his wife had but not a Lease executed except liuery had beene made in the very Lands seised for a Lease in possession of thrée acres maketh them to bee no parcell of a Mannor during the Lease but a rent charge or a lease executory which is but an interest leaueth the possession entire and no reuersion in the Baron there is further in the Commentaries the Case of Dame Hales viz. Sir Iames Hales Lessée for yeares in his owne right taking a new Lease for twelue yeares ouer in remainder to himselfe and his Wife died felo de se the wholâ— interest was iudged forfeitâ— for the felonye had relation from the act done id est from entrance into the water c. At which time the Baron had power to grant and consequently to forfeit it If the Wife haue a ward by reason of her Seigniory this likewise is a Chattell reall and the Husbands interest in it shall be as in a terme or lease for yeers But if the wife be gardian in socage no lease of the infants land though it be made by Baron and feme per Indenture shall binde the wife but she may enter after the husbands death and if she die the husband shall not haue the Gardianship For in this Case the wife hath nothing to her owne vse but she is an officer appointed vpon confidence in her naturall loue and this office is not grantable nor forfeitable vide nat bre 145. I haue hitherto but shewed what is wrought as it were ipso facto vpon marriages consummation while it is gréene not past a day or a wéeke old and I thought it methodicall to insert the learning of battery because in my poore opinion it were better to combat for houshold mastry in the beginning then to bring a Writt of right for it when it hath gone too long by title of rusty prescription SECT XI Of the Wiues interest of affaires before Marriage
comfort of your Husband yet a farre greater comfort the effect of Balaams desires Let me die the death of the righteons and let my end be like his SECT XV. The Husbands power in Lands which the Wife holdeth in Dower or otherwise for life THe Husbands Soueraigntie ouer his wife her goods and chattels personall or reall is no lesse then hath béen declared The dominion likewise ouer all manner of Franke Tenements his owne or his Wiues is supereminent in him during Couerture but so that he standeth well bridled from doing any thing a per luy whereby either the Dower which his wife had by a former marriage or expecteth by the present or any other estate for life or in fée can be taken from her when heâ— is gone If a Widdow tenant in Dower marry and her new husband surrendreth c. this is good during Couerture but if the Feme suruiue or if there be a Diuorce causa praecontractus the Feme may enter and defeate the surrender though he to whom it was made be dead and his Heyre in by descent yea and the Law differeth not heere though the Wife had ioyned with the Husband in the surrender But if Baron and Feme will surrender Lands which the wife holdeth for life by fine this shall bind the wife for the wife which is giuer shall be examined c. for no particular Tenant can surrender by fine without being named in the writt wherevpon the fine is leuied Par. 117. If a lease be made to Baron and Feme for life and the Baron make aliâ—nation in fee the Lessour may enter for a forfeiture and maintaine an assise if he be ousted but the Wife surâ—iâ—ing may haue a cui in vira post mortem is by a husband disseised release all his right to the husband and afterward notwithstanding the release brings a writt of entry in nature of an Assise and recouereth against him by default the wife of the releassée shall bee indowed But if the Heyre of a disseisor being in by descent the disseisée re-enter and take a wife now a recouery against the Baron by default or reddition in a writt of entry in nature of Assise taketh away Dower from the wife for the recoueror had right according to the nature of his action and the possession which the Baron had during Couerture is destroyed But it falleth out otherwise where a man is married and then there is a disseisin descent entry and recouery vt supra If a Precipe be brought against the Baron which pleadeth misnosmer or iointenancy and it is found against him whereby the demandant recouereth this ousteth not Dower vnlesse the Demandant had right In a writt of entry in le post against the Baron hee voucheth himselfe to saue the state taile and sheweth how his father gaue him the land in taile and that the fée simple is descended vnto him and vpon a trauerse of the gift in taile it is found for the demandant which recouereth and the Baron dieth Now if so be that the Baron might well haue pleaded a release of all actions or all right of the demandant the Wife may falsifie this recouery in her writt of Dower Tenant in taile hauing Issue dieth a stranger abateth dieth his heyre entreth and takes a wife the Issue of tenant in taile arraignes an assise of Mortdancestor against the Baron which trauerseth the points of the writt and they are found against him so that the demandant recouereth and the Baron dieth It hath béene holden that the wife shall not recouer Dower heere vntill the heyre haue reuersed the verdict by attaint But it seemes saith Parkins he may falsifie the recouery in a writt of Dower maine tenant for the husband might haue pleaded to the action of the demandants writt and if the Feme which by no meanes might haue attaint must tarry till the Heyre haue defeated the verdict perhaps he will neuer sue attaint or he will release so the wife which once was intituled to dower by her husbands possession neuer defected but by his owne lachesse should lose her Dower maugre sat est which seemeth vnreasonable Yet quaere saith he for the iudgement is upon a verdict comprehending matter repugnant and contrary to that which should hee pleaded against the writt But if the demandants entry had béene congeable then out of doubt the wife had had no power of falsifying for the entry had wrought a remitter The Heyre of a Disseisor entreth taking a wife and the Disseisée in a writ of entry ad terminum qui preterit recouereth against the Baron by default the wife may falsifie this recouery in a writ of Dower But it is seldome that the demandant in Dower shall falsifie a recouery against the husband had by his lachesse in not pleading a plea which went méerely in abatement of the writt And therefore to say that the Baron might haue pleaded misnosmer or ioynt-tenancie will not serue to falsifie a recouery But if she can proue that the demandant had no right nor cause of action but iointly with a stranger which stranger by his deed shewed forth to the Court had released before commencement of suit all his right to her husband being in possession this will serue to falsifie the recouery for a moity Thus hath Parkins in his treatie of Dower at large discouered that a title neuer tryed against the Baron in his life time may be tryed by his wife when he is in his grane And so further 36. H. 6. titulo fauxifier de recouerie in Fitzherbert 15. That a woman may falsifie a recouery had against her husband by action tried but it must be in another point and not in the very same which was tried by the recouery SECT XVII Losse of Dower by the Husbands attainder HEe that hath a notable grudge against his wife and would be sure to delude her hope of Dower hath adirect way though it be somewhat dangerous and I will not be of his Counsell Hee needs doe no more but imagine compasse and conspire some detestable renowned treason of the old stampe and if he be once attainted thereof according to his desire c. But if he doe but pingle as suffer himselfe to bee outlawed in action of trespasse this was neuer any forfeiture of Franke Tenement The Law was in the late dayes of Littleton and Parkins that euery attainder of murther or felonie done by the Baron was an ouster of dower to the wife The first Solons of the English Law be like thought that tender regard of a wiues estate should restraine a husband from all inormious transgression against the sacred Crowne and dignitie Royall would God it might but the true reason why the law was so penall for such offences of the husband toward the wife in whom perhaps was no fault that thereby shee should haue no Dower and towards the children that they should haue no descent of inheritance but the hereditary blood should be corrupt was vpon
these reasons grounded vpon the Law of nature and giuen by Iustice Stamford in his booke fo 194. saith he to this effect men will now eschew those Capitall crimes when they shall sée those persons who in nature and affection are néerest and dearest vnto them and most to bee beloued shall be punished with themselues so that if themselues will not refraine such crimes for themselues yet they should the rather refraine for the loue of their wife children vpon whom they bring so perpetuall losse and punishment and staine of so infamous a note as that their stocke blood and Lineage shall be corrupted and attainted their children disinherited and the wiues of their bosomes because the wiues of such impious and foolish Husbands by their defaults depriued of all their meanes and liuelihood And Breton fo 258. makes another reason why a wife of a man attainted c. shall lose her Dower est pur ceo que est a supposer que el scauoit del felony son mary and by him a woman lost no Dower in case the felony were committed before Couerture King Edward the sixt in the first yeare of his Reigne abrogating some Statutes concerning treasons or felonie for their austerity and making some new decrees concerning treason preserued Dower against all perpetrations of an euill husband But 5. 6. eiusdem regis ca. 11. by the last prouiso It was againe enacted that no Wife of any person attainted of treason should bee receiued to demand or haue Dower c. Yet for felonie 1. Ed. 6. is still in force And treasons by Act 5. Eliz. ca. 1. for assurance of her Maiesties royall power or by the Act eodem anno cap. 11. against clipping washing rounding or filing of Coynes or by the Act 18. Eliz. ca. 1. against diminishing or impayring the Quéenes Coyne or other coyne currant here doe none of them make any corruption of blood or forfeiture of Dower Note if after attainder the Baron purchase his pardon this is so farre forth a new birth vnto him that his Wife shall haue Dower of the Lands which come to him after pardon if his Issue by her may per possibilitie inherite Par. 75. And remember this Case 3. 4. Phi. Marie Dyer 140. b. Marie the wife of Sir Iohn Gate attainted of treason brought a Writt of Dower against Wiseman the attainder of Sir Iohn was certainly pleaded in barre she replyed that long time before the attainder and before the treason committed after the Espousals the said Sir Iohn Gate was seised in fee of the Land whererof she demands Dower and thereof enfeoffed A. B. whose estate the tenant hath vpon a demurrer without argument at barre or bench the Councell of the parties being heard in Iustice Brookes Chamber the demandant was barred of Dower by opinion of all the Iustices because the Statute is The Wife of a man attainted of any manner of treason whatsoeuer shall in no wise bee receiued to aske challenge demand or haue dower of any her Husbands Lands during the force of that attainder And by Stamford 195. this extendeth to petty treason But nota saith Dyer the Lands here sold and gone before treason committed were neuer subiect to forfeiture or escheate vt in causa Vauisor M. Littleton in the Chapter of Dower And therefore Antho Browne Serieant was angrie at the heart for this Iudgement See Littleton fo 11. per Vauisor If a man commit felonie aliene his land and then be attainted the Wife shall haue action of Dower against the Feoffée but not against the King or Lord if it be escheated SECT XVIII The Husbands power in his wiues inheritance and of discontinuance A Womans Inheritance is Lands of Inheritance which she hath by descent or purchase and her Marriage such as was giuen her in Franke Marriage by learned M. Littleton But take heere all fée-simple or fée-taile which she hath sole by her selfe or ioyntly with some other to be her Inheritance Then know that at Common Law a man seised in the right of his Wife of greene acre may make a feoffement of it to a stranger and this is such an interruption called a discontinuance of the wiues estate that not onely the Baron is bound whilest he liueth but the Wife also when he is dead is by common Law forbidden entry into her owne land and put to her action of cui in vita but if a man seised in the right of his wife be disseised and release to the disseisor though it bee with warrantie this is no Discontinuance If a man seised in fée in the right of his Wife haue Issue by her a sonne and die and then a second Husband makes a Lease of the Land for terme of his life and the Wife dyeth if now the Lessée surrender to the second Baron it is a question whether the sonne can enter during the life of lease for life But cleere saith Littleton when he is dead the son may enter for the discontinuance which was but forthe life was determined If Tenant in the right of his Wife make a Lease for his owne life the reuersion in fée is in the Baron If hee die in the life time of his Wife and of the Lessee and his heyre grant the reuersion with atturnament now though the grantee enter after the death of the Lessee yet the wife may re-enter for as an estate taile cannot be discontinued but by one which is seised by force of the intaile so the estate of a Wife is not discontinuable but by him which is seised in the wiues right SECT XIX Of a Remitter YOu must vnderstand somewhat also of a Remitter And because women learne faster by example then by precept I will not stay to define a Remitter Baron and Feme seised together in speciall taile haue Issue a daughter the wife dyeth the Baron catcheth another wife hath Issue by her another daughter discontinueth the taile disseiseth the discontinuee and dieth now is the Land descended to the two daughters the eldest daughter is remitted that is remaunded and setled in the ancient estate for a moitie and driuen to a Formedone against her Sister for the other moity for here the Sisters are by seuerall titles tenants in common not parceners If Tenant in taile infeoffe a Feme sole and die and then his sonne being vnder age intermarrieth with the Feme Feoffée this is a remitter to the Sonne and his wife which before had fée-simple hath now nothing at all in the land But if the sonne had beene of full age at the time of espousals hee had not regained the ancient estate but stood seised onely in droit sa feme If a Woman seised c. take a husband which alieneth in fee and then takes backe an estate to him and his wife for life this reprisall though it were by Indenture or by fine is meerely the act of the Husband and the woman sans folly is adiudged in her Remitter the reuersion of the
such Lease there shall be reserued yearly to the Lessors their heyres and successors to whom the Lands should haue come after the Lessers death if such Lease had not béene made or to whom the reuersion shall appertaine so much or more annuall ferme or rent as hath béene most accustomably yéelded c. within twenty yeares next before such Leases were made And euery person to whom the reuersion shal appertaine after the death of such Lessors or their heyres shal haue such remedies a aduantages to all intents against the Lessées their executors or assignes as the Lessor might haue had So that if the Lessor were seised in in speciall taile c. the issue or heyre of that speciall estate shall haue the reuersion rent and seruices c. Prouiso that the wife bee made party to euery Lease made by her Husband of any Mannors Lands Tenements or Hereditaments being the wiues Inheritance and that euery such Lease be by Indenture in the name of the Husband and the Wife and she to seale the same And that the ferme be reserued to the Husband and wife and to the heyres of the Wife according to her estate of Inheritance And that the Husband shall not in any wise alien discharge grant or giue any the rent or any part therof longer then during Couerture without it be by fine leuied by the Husband and wife but the rent shall remaine descend reuert or come c in such sort and manner as the land should haue done if no such Lease had béene made prouided that this act extend not to giue liberty of taking more fermes c. then before was lawfull c. nor inable Vicar or Parson to make or grant their Lease of Messuages Lands Tenements Tythes c. or Hereditaments belonging to their Church or Uicarage And it is further enacted that all Leases made within thrée yeares before the twelâ—th of Aprill in the 31 yeare of H. 8. made by Indenture sealed by person or persons of full age of whole memory not vnlawfully coacted nor vnder Couert Baron for terme of yeares of any Mannors Lands tenements or Hereditaments whereof the Lessor or Lessors were seiâ—ed in any estate of Inheritance to their onely vse at the time of their Lease-making and whereof the Lessées their executors or assignes at time of this act Making were in possession by vertue of the Lease no cause of re-entry or forfeiture being had or made shall be good and effectuall in law against the Lessors their heyres and successors according to the couenants and agréements specified in the Indenture c. so that there be reserued to the Lessors their heyres successors c. as much yearely rent as was at any time yéelded within 20. yeares before making of any such lease or else the Leases to be of none other effect then they were of before this act And moreouer it is ordained that no fine feoffement act or acts to be made suffered or done by the husband onely of any Mannors Lands c. being the Inheritance or fréehold of the wife during Couerture betweene them shall in any wise be or make any discontinuance or be preiudiciall to the said wife or her heyres or to such as shall claime right title or interest by her death But that shée or her heyres or they to whom such right or title shall appertaine after her decease shall and may lawfully enter into such Mannors Lands c. any such fine feoffement or other act notwithstanding except fines onely leuied by Baron and Feme wherunto the wife is priuie and a partie Prouided that this clause extend not to giue any liberty to any Wife or her heyres to auoid any Lease hereafter to bee made of any her Inheritance by her husband and her selfe for 21. yeares or vnder or for thrée liues at the most whereupon yearely rent shall be reserued vt supra Prouided also that this act extend not to any Lease heretofore made by Ecclesiasticall or other person by Coâ—eâ—t or Common-seale which Lease is made voyd by act of Parliament nor to make good any Lease of any Ecclesiasticall person made by câ—uent seale or otherwise or of any other person attainted of â—reason c. SECT XXIII The Exposition THis Law in the first part is affirmatiue or I may say leasatiue a leasing Law or Statute Tenant in fée-simple iure mero suo nothing restrained by it No more is Tenant iure vxoris but he may make a Lease for yeares to continue till the last hower of Platoes great yeare or till King Arthur come againe for all this Statute for no greater rent then thrée bundle of bulrushes as well as he might before although her land were neuer leased before since Noaâ—s floud and such a Lease shall bind him during Couerture But if the Husband make a Lease by paroll or by poll déede or by Indenture and the wife not partie or if the Land were not informer times demised or if the ancient rent or more be not reserued then as the earth stayeth in the worlds center vpon nothing but Gods prouidence and permission the Demisée leaneth vpon no Statute but hangeth at the wiues courtesie ponderibus librata suis as at Common Law SECT XXIV Law before the Statute HOw that was yée shall perceiue by the cases following If before the Statute of quia emptores tenant in fée iure vxoris infeoffed a stranger expressing no tenure the feoffés was to hold of the Baron by such seruices as he and the Wife held by of the Lord Paramount If the Baron and Feme had ioyned in a Feoffement to hold of the Baron c. th expressed tenure had béene voyd and the Feoffee must haue held of them both by such seruices as they held ouer c. If the Baron in this case had died and the Wife accepted the rent in her viduity this acceptance here barred her for euer from auoyding the Feoffement by Writt of cui in vita If Tenant iure vxoris and his Wife had made a Feoffement to hold of the Wife the Feoffor should haue held of them both and if the Wife had died the Feoffor was to hold of the Baron till the feoffement were auoyded by sur cui vâ—a Par. 126. Againe if before this Statute of 32. H. 8. Tenant in fée iuro vxoris and his wife had ioyned in exchange for other lands in fée and the exchange being executed the Husband had dyed now the Feme by entring in vpon the Land giuen her vpon the exchange should be barred for euer from defeating the exchange But if it had béene made by the Baron alone she might haue defeated it notwithstanding her entrie for that could giue noseisin by force of the exchange to her that was neither partie nor priuie to it Par. fo 8. And if a man seised in right of his Wife c. make a Lease for life rendring rent with a letter of Atturney to his Wife to make liuery the Wife deliuers
hath not the force of a negatiue implying in nul auter manner then is therein described Amy is therefore a ioynt purchaser with her husband in estate for life and not in or by descent of estate taâ—â—e Now to say that her right and estate should change by silent operation of the Law after shee was repossessed that cannot be for the whole entry is tolled and if she be not remitted by her first possession and reprisall she is neuer remitted If a Disseisour make feoffement to the vse of the Disfeisée and after the Disseisor enter he shall be remitted but before his entry he shall not be remitted for he shall be adiudged in possession by vertue of the Statute but so soone as hee entreth he is remitted for his entry was neuer tolled But Amy Townesends entry was cleane taken away by the discontinuance c. further if she should be remitted by the Statute of 27. the remainders should be all destroyed contrary to the text of the same Statute And to the inconueâ—iencie alleadged if she shall not be remitted shee shall hold incombred with the charges of her Husband that is none at all for Amy after her husbands death might haue disagréed and relinquished the vse with possession annexed to it by bringing a cui in vita against him next in remainder for in him by such disagréement or vser of action had the remainder vested as though the woman had beene a Monke or dead person in Law or neuer named in the limitation If the vse had béene to Amy Townsend in fée she might haue brought her cui in vita against the Feoffor or his heyre by which they shall be Tenants to her action and so might the inâ—umbrance haue béene auoyded for when a feoffement is to the vse of one which refuseth the vse it shall be in effect as if the vse had beene limited to Paules stéeple or to Charing-Crosse all falling or reflecting because the Feoffor hath no recompence or consideration to his vse and hee shall be Tenant to euery Precipe It was further agreed that as the Cause fell out Amy Townesend could not be remitted though her possession had returned by refeoffemeÌ„t at the Common Law because Sir Roger Townesend her Husband outliued her for 21. Ed. 3. the Case is Baron made a Feoffement the Feoffée â—einfeoffe the Baron and Feme and heyres of the wife she woman dyed the Heyre entred the Baron brought an Assise which was iudged maintainable for whilest the Baron liued he was tenant to the heyres action And the thâ— Iudgement was that Amy Townsend was neuer remitted the reason was indéed because there is nothing in the Statute of 27. to make a remitter for the clause of sauing of Drâ—its Titles and Actions is of such right c. as was before the Statute and not of any right title or action risen since or after it Now note that as a Lease made for twenty yeares by Baron and feme Tenants for life binds not any remainder by the Statute which speaketh onely that Leases made by Tenants of Inheritance shall binde heyres and Successors so I would inferre that if the Leassors inheritance be determined whether it were iure vxoris in taile or otherwise in taile the remainder must be frée from the Statute But note that the point which made me choose this case for illustration of the Statute is this Amy Townesend was iudged not remitted because she had no title of entry but onely by the 27 c. of vses and therefore she must néeds claime her possession according to the vse But put Case the Feoffement had béene since the Statute of 32 the Law would then haue iudged a remitter for by Littleton where any persons entry is congeable which taketh estate for life or in fée it is a remitter if the reprisall be not by Indenture or record or some matter of estoppell for alwayes where there is a double right or title the Law must iudge for the best as well in the entry as in the possession and an Indenture made by Baron and Feme is none estoppell to the Wife by the Common Law Concerning the Case 21. Ed. 3. Wilby which gaue iudgement thought the Barons aduantage a hinderance to the Remitter yet if he died the wife should be remitted But if you looke Brooke remitter 21. and 41. ye shall finde that the Feme was maintenant remitted though to saue the husbands aduantage of warranty they would not so iudge it quod mirum saith Brooke and quaere quia contrarium a ceo iour SECT XXVII Whether acceptance or taciturnity may not take away an entry at this day NO fine feoffement or other act done by the husband onely shall make any discontinuance or be preiudiciall to the wife but that she may enter c. what if Baron and Feme make a feoffement or Lease for life by solemne Indentures with Liuery and seisin cleere this takes not away at this day the wiues entry after Couerture ended But admit when shee is a widdow shee refuseth to enter and accept payment of rent or performance of couenants is not now both her entry and her action gone also euen as in case of an Infant which makes such a feoffement or Lease and accepts the rent when he is of full age The question must be answered out of the Statute and in mine opinion there is nothing in it to ayde a woman after such ratification by acceptance volenti non fit iniuria nec inuitis confirmantur beneficia A Lease by Baron Feme per Indenture is not voyd presently by the Barons death But whereas before she was driuen to suit and action shee may now enter by the Statute yet it compels her not to enter neither caâ—teth any frée-hold vpon her In like manner if the Baron alone alien his Wiues Land by fine with proclamation the Wife may enter by force of this Statute but per opinionem totius curiae Ed. 6. Dyer fo 72. If she suffer fiue yeares to passe and expire without entry or vser of action she and her heyres shall be barred for euer for this Statute of 32. though it limit no time for the womans entry yet it speaketh nothing of fines with proclamation and therefore it takes not the generall Law made 4. Hen. 7. cap. 24. of fines with proclamation And sée Sir Ed. Cokes 8. Rep. fo 72. in Grenlies case SECT XXVIII Of Fines SEe further the case 18. Eliz. Dyer 351. Land holden in socage was giuen to a man and his wife in taile the remainder in sée to the Barons right heyres the Baron alone leuied a fine with proclamation to his owne vse and afterward by his last will and Testament in writing deuised the Land to his wife for life the remainder ouer to a Stranger vpon condition to pay certaine rent annually out of the land with Clause of distresse c. the Baron died the wife entering and claiming estate onely for life paid rent
according to the will and died Now the question is whâ— the Issue in taile or Deuisée of the remainder should haue this Land Et per iudicium curiae Partly because his mother had waued the estate taile and although shee had not done so yet because he could not conuey his title and discent but aswell as heyre to his father as to his mother the fine with proclamations leuied onely by his father barres him So farre goeth the Booke And you may obserue that it barres the wife if she will See also 5. Eliz. 224 in Dyer the husband leuied a fine with proclamations of his owne land and after fiue yeares died his widdow continuing sole of full age whole memory out of prison within compasse of the foure Seas and doth not make any demand or claime of dower within 5. yeers after her husbands death quaere if he which pleadeth in barre of Dower ought expresly to auerre this The question was if she were barred of Dower Dyer telleth vs termino Hillarij 4. H. 8. rotulo 344. such a barre pleaded was admitted good for the ground of Dower was the Husbands seisin and the action giuen by his death So that it is within the second sauing of 4. H 7. which preserueth to all which are not parties pursuit of right growne after the fine by or vpon cause before the fine so that they take it within fiue yeares In Plowden fo 373. Iustice Dyer arguing Stowell and the Lord Zouches case affirmes the learning which I haue recited out of his owne booke But Plowden inserts his note that he takes the Law to be otherwise and that a woman is bound to no time of her Dower after such a fine for saith he the ayme of 4. H. 7. as against future droicts is wholly against such rights as either suffered wrong before the fine or by the fine and in this case of Dower the title is all after the fine and standeth well in accord with it not touched by the Statute the woman therefore may demand when she listeth So if there be a cessor begun a yeare before a fine with proclamations continued a yeare after the Lord is not restreyned at the end of 5. or 15. yeares to bring a cessauir so he saith likewise if a morgage be disseised a fine lenied by the Disseisor with Proclamations passed yet the morgager paying his mony to the Morgagee may at any time within 5. years or more after the payment re-enter When Giants fight Pigmées may not part them but howsoeuer some incertainty arise in euery corner of the Law this is here certaine that a fine leuied by the husband onely of his owne land tolleth not the wiues action of Dower if she come in time And a fine so leuied by him of the wiues Land taketh not away her seasonable entry but the gulfe that swalled vp entrie action right and all possibility of reducement by Law is a fine lawfully leuied by baron and feme where forsooth because a woman is examined by a Iustice or one that hath a Dedimus potestatem c. and acknowledgeth her frée consent and agréement what cannot men get wiues to doe if they list she shall be barred and for euer excluded of a great many acres of ground for a few kisses and a gay gowne That is a fine finem litibus imponens for till it be done and dispatcht the poore woman can haue no quiet her husband keepes such a iawling SECT XXIX Of common recoueries AS for trickes of Common recoueries I perceiue not how that can be greatly preiudiciall to women for first if a man will suffer a faigned recouery of his owne Land to defeate his wiues Dower she may falsiâ—â—e it c. sée the Eiectione firmae per Eare against Snow Plowd fo 515. the baron there being tenant in taile his wife hauing nothing in the Land he and his wife suffered a common recouery with voucher to his owne vse c. the opinion of all the Iustices was that though the woman suruiued yet the estate taile shal be barred for it was found precisely by verdict that the wife had no interest in the Inheritance The baron therefore which alone lost estato taile by the recouery might recouer alone estate taile in value But as for the wife no man can say what estate shee had nor whether she should haue a quod ei deforceat or a Writt of right if she had lost the land by default So likewise hauing lost by the recouery nothing or no man can tell what her recompence in value must be She was named said the Iustices vpon intent to barre her of Dower and such is the meaning of husbaÌ„ds which wil haue their wiues named in such recoueries but cleere the estate taile is barred if in this case the wife might sue execution in value against the vouchée by estoppell yet the issue in taile should not be concluded by the act of his Father but he might oust her of that which she had so recouered in value c. see Sir E. Cokes 10. Rep. 43. a. in Mary Portingtons ca. that the vsage hath béen alwayes vpon common recoueries against Baron and Feme to examine the wife and to grant a dedimus potestatem to take vpon her examination her Conusance as in case of a Fine But let the case be Tenant iure vxoris is agréed with Iohn a Stile to suffer a recouery of his wiues Lands to certaine vses comprised in Indentures betwixt them two a Writ of entry in the post is brought against the Baron and Feme which appeare in person or by Atturney calling to warranty the common vouchée a man well worth a couple of new rosted egges which re-enters into warrantie Then after declaration and imparlance at the day of the appearance shall the demandant recouer against Baron and Feme and they in right of the Wife shall recouer against the Vouchee of such lands as he hath or is like to haue when time hath a hairy crowne shall this recouery or possibility of vnlikely recouery in value binde the wife when the Baron is dead whether she will or no by Brooks nouell cases 23. H. 8. pl. 37. it séemes that such a recouery did then bind the wife to but without examination mee thinks it should not bind the wife The Statute of 32. is that none Act of the Barons shall make discontinuance c. except onely a Fine by Baron and Feme Ergo such a recouery notwithstanding though it be executed the wife may enter See 23. Eliz. cap. 3. and there is a sauing to euery Feme couert or her heyres her Writt of error to be sued within 7. yeares after she become sole for reuersing of Fines and recoueries past if they must be reuersed by error it séemes without error they were very dangerous For a rule to conclude withall take this That wheresoeuer the Baron doth any thing out of Court which thing he and his Wife were compellable to doe it
Legacie was with an expresse exclusion of Dower c. But see Sir Ed. Cokes 4. Rep. fo 4. a. in Vernons case resolued that vnlesse it be expressed in the will to bee for her Ioynture it shall be no satisfaction for her Dower See 38. H. 8. Dyer 61. William Whorewhod seised of Land to the value of 360. pound of which 60. pound was by ioynt purchase to him and his Wife during Couerture deuised that his wife should haue the third part of all his land during her life with those Lands which she had in Ioynture the assignement to be made by his executors if it were not contrary to Law this Widdow refused her Iointure of 60. pound and demand a third part of the whole inheritance viz. 120. pound as her Legacie with a third part of that which remained for her Dâ—wer viz. 80. pound at last by agréement it was ordered and decréed in the Court of Wards that she should haue the Legacie vt supra and forty pound ouer for Dower This Case decideth the question for it is against the latter opinion expresse ideo quaere Brooke noteth also Dower 69. that per Iusticiarios if a man make his Wife ioynt-purchaser with him after Couerture of any estate of Franke Tenement vnlesse it be to him and his Wife and their Heyres in fée-simple it is a barre of Dower if she agrée to the Ioynture post mortem viri otherwise it is of fée-simple for thereof the Statute saith nothing But M. Brograue in his reading did maintaine for all the foresaid opinion that where fee-simple is conueyed to a Feme for Ioynture expresly it is a good Iointure within compasse of this Statute for if estate in taile or for life be a good Iointure and exclude Dower by acceptance c. a fortiore fée-simple shall barre And sée in Vernons case reported by Sir Ed. Coke 4. Rep. fo 3. b. that the case in Brooke is mis-reported and the Lord Dyer is against it and confuteth Brooks reasons of this opinion Hee relied also vpon dame Dennis case 8. Eliz Dyer 248. An Indenture was made 36. Hâ—n 8. Betwixt Sir Maurice Dennis and Elizabeth Statham that in consideration of expected Marriage and other things reasonable the said Sir Maurice and his heyres should from thenceforth stand seised of certaine Lands c. to the vse of himselfe and his heyres vntill Marriage were had and solemnized and then to the vse and behoofe of the said Maurice and Elizabeth and their heyres after Marriage Sir Maurice dyed entred into the Lands and demanded Dower of his other Lands it was a question whether this conueyance and matter vt supra with auerrement that it was for a Ioynture should barre her of Dower Catline Saunders and Dyer were against the Dower by equitie of the Statute which in the third prouiso is of Ioyntures for terme of life or otherwise Against them were Iustice Browne and Whiddon and they resembled this Statute to another of the 11. H. 7. ca. 20. which cannot be extended to fée-simple but is meant and expressed onely of estate for Life or in taile seuerally or ioyntly with the Baron But Iustice Dyer as it séemeth by M. Brograue vpon diligent conference with sage men of Law did strongly adhere to his former opinion that this conueyance with auerment made a good Ioynture Yee shall finde againe 14. 15. Elâ—z he affirmeth for Law that where Fée-simple is limited ouer to a Wife or estate made to Baron and Feme in fée it is auerrable pro iunctura if the conueyance he not expresly contrary Sée a question for auerment Dyer 226. One that had an vse in Fée of certaine Lands to the value annuall of 100. pound tooke a wife 22. H. 8. and after espousals at request of his wiues friends and Parents caused the Feoffees to execute estate to him and his wife and to the heyres of himselfe of parcell of this Land to twenty pound value c. He then purchased other Lands and after 27. dyed seised of all The wife by taking rents and profits of the twenty pound land agreed to her estate therein and afterward brought a Writ of Dower detertia parâ—e residui omnium terrarum c. because the Statute is expressed of Iointure and the déed whereby estate was made to the baron and feme hath no mention of Ioynture or Dower quaere whether this matter generally alledged without auerment that it was pro junctura vel pro doâ—e shall barre or no See the Institutions of Sir Ed. Coke â—o 36. much matter concerning Ioynture In all conueyance or purchase for Ioynture vnlesse it be by fine or common recouerie he which makes the estate must be a person able to conuey c. at the time of Ioynture making or else it is not good He must not therefore be non compos mentis attaint of treason an alien borne or vnder age but the non-age of the Wife is not materiall whether the Ioynture be made before Couerture or after if she accept it agréed at M. Fiâ—ches reading SECT XXXII The Words Land Tenement or Hereditament LAnd is intended as well of pasture meadow woods heath c. as of arable and lands couered with water or surrounded is within the Statute So is a Towne an Isle c. but vestura terrae or an vpper Chamber cannot make a Ioynture as Land Tenements assured in Ioynture may bee Aduousans Rectories Windmils an vpper Chamber a Seigniory in Chiualrie and a reuersion sur estate pur viâ— all comming within the meaâ—ing of the Statute As for a reuersion vpon or after estate for yeares it is rather in account of law land then a tenement for the Franke Tenement which is the principall is as the present substance of the Land it selfe And the reuersion of either of these particular estates if rent be reserued may well be assigned for a Ioynture Yea and whether rent be reserued or no vpon a Lease for yeares it might be somewhat doubted whether the reuersion be assignable for a Ioynture c. because the Frank Tenement passeth presently and a woman may haue an assise thereof But cleere a nude reuersion sur estate pur vie sans rent because it is no present commoditie cannot make a Ioynture yet if such a reuersion be assigned and it turne to a possession in the Husbands life time it may be a good Ioynture by matter of subsequent Hereditament within the Statute may be a rent charge granted to a woman for life though it were neuer in esse before or a rent reserued vpon a Lease for life But the Hereditament assigned must bee a profit and commodity or else it is not assignable c for homage or fealtie shall not make any Ioynture Rent payable euery fiue yeare may be assigned for Ioynture for is a profit though it be not annuall And an ancient kéepership of a Parke with a fée belonging to it may be appointed or assigned in Dower But so is not a
by Parliament But if the Ioynture were made before Marriage the woman must néeds hold her to her Ioynture sans election And this is by implication vpon the third prouiso as appeareth by the report of Anderson c Sée Commentaries Plowden 390. The Case 6. Eliz. Dyer 228. is That Richard Ashton Esquire in accomplishment of certaine Indentures dentures betwixt him and Sir William Barenport concerning Marriage to be had betwixt Richard Ashton the sonne and Elizabeth the daughter of Sir William which gaue seuen hundred Markes with her in marriage infeoffed certaine persons before Marriage of Land to the annuall rent of twenty pound to the vse of the said Elizabeth for terme of her life The Marriage being consummate first Richard the Father and then Richard the Sonne died then it was found by office that Richard the sonne died seised in Fée if these Lands whereof the Feoffement was made and of other Lands holden by Chiualry as of the Dutchie of Laâ—caster his heyre being vnder age the first question was whether shee might retaine the twenty pound Lands â—â—d haue Dower of the rest because she was not Richard Aâ—â—â—ons wife at the time of the Feoffement first made neither was it made of the barons lands or by the baron resolued by Councell of the Court that shée was barred of Dower And it was so likewise resolued in Vernons Case Sir Ed. Cokes 4. Report wherein is much learning touching Ioynture The second question in Eliz. Astons ca. was whether she were Dowable from the Quéene because the feoffement was not found by the Office The third question whether it might be aâ—â—râ—ed for the Quéene in stay of petition of Dower that the Feoffement was made pro iunctura no such matter being expressed neither in the déed of Feoffement or Indenture of Coâ—â—â—ants The fourth question whether the Widdow Elizabeth might be receiued to auerre and proue by Commissi 〈…〉 the Court of Wards that the Feoffement was not meant for a Ioynture Here is enough to make Women be wâ—â—e how they take Ioyntures before Marriage Take 〈…〉 ther to admonish you beware of fines after Marriâ—â—â— Ioynture was made to a Feme Couert by her Baron shée and her baron aliened the land by fine sur connusance de droit by the opinion of Iustices Wray Bell Manhood and Dyer she shall not demand Dower of the residue of her husbands Land after his death for she aliened her Ioynture before time of election was giuen her by the Statute quaere But if the fine had bene sur connusance de droit come ceo que le connuseead de done le Baron tantum this had béene a better forme for the wife and lesse dangerous 19. Eliz. Dyer 358. SECT XXXIX What is a sufficient refusall or agreement of or to a Iointure made after Couerture See Sir Edw. Cokes 3. Rep. in Butlers and Bakers Case THe refusing or agreement c. because they are peremptory must not bee clouded darke doubtfull or implicatiue but plaine and expresse a bare word or saying by a woman that she will refuse her Ioynture or accept it is not materiall as diuers Iustices doe hold it But if shee come vpon the Land whereof she is Dowable and there refusing her Ioynture pray the heyre to assigne her Dower this is such a refusall that the heyre by this shall be charged in damages from this time forth in a writt of Dower and this refusall must be to the heyre himselfe and not to a Stranger If a Widow waiue the possession of a house or tenement assigned in Ioynture by her husband and get her to another place this is no refusall But if she haue any medling with the land assigned in Ioynture or doe any other act amounting to assent or dissenting as for example If she bring a writt of Dower and declare vpon it this is peremptory although she bee vnder age Couert or not Couert of a second Husband for the Law saith that they which haue discretion to acquire and get things haue sufficient discretion to giue and preserue those things gotten Therefore if an Infant cdme to any thing by purchase hee shall not in that haue any aduantage or bee in better plight then a parson of full age As where estate is made to an Infant of two acres to haue and hold the one for life the other in fée c. a Feoffement made of one whilest he is yet vnder age is a sufficient election And if a rent charge bee granted to an Infant whereupon he bringeth a Writt of annuity he shall neuer auow for it as a vent when he commeth to full age So if an Infant recouer debt and sue execution by elegit c. he shall neuer haue a scire facias And an Infant is subiect to an action of waste or entry for condition broken as well as any other person These collections gathered as I thinke by some well learned and industrious Student out of M. Brograues reading though they want of the fulnesse and perfection which the owne pen of so great a Lawyer might haue giuen them yet are they pertinent and important And I not a little beholding to him from whose hands I obtaine them SECT XL. Of Actions brought by Baron and Feme or by one of them NOw because the common sayings are found by common experience true Qui capit vxorâ—m capit lites and qui habet terras habet guerras A Wife brings iarres and wealth brings warres quarrels suits and controuersies at Law sans câ—o that it hath any other intendment it will not be amisse a little to declare how and in what manner actions at law must be commenced and pursued by baâ—on and Feme or against them or by or against one of them according to prescription of Law and their seuerall and ioynt Interests c. SECT XLI Where the Baron shall sue onely in his owne name A Man shall sue for his Wiues Marriage money onely in his owne name but how or where that is a matter of some obscurity by Bracton lib. 5. ca. 10. 407. money that is promised causa Matrimonij is as a sequell of Marriage and so being annexed to a thing spirituall requires a spirituall suite yet he confesseth that it is otherwise for Land promised or couenanted c. Fitzherbert in his Writ of Debt citeth 31. Ed. 3. that if a man promise one twenty pound to marry his Daughter which marrieth her accordingly he may haue a Writ of debt vpon his promise but he forgets not the â—éere difference in the Booke of assizes for in the Writt of prohibition he tels vs if a man promise one twenty pounds if he marry his Daughter after marriage if the promiser will not pay the money the husband may not sue in Court Christian if hee doe a prohibition lyeth marry if I promise one twenty pounds with my Daughter in Marriage c. now vpon non-payment he may sue in Court Christian for this concerneth Matrimony The same
Ienny Defendant entred in Banco Regis Hillar 2. Iacobi Rot 571 where the Plaintiffe declared that the Defendant in consideration that the Plaintiffe had formerly married his Daughter at his speciall request the Defendant promised the Plaintiffe to pay him euery yéere during the life of the Defendant ten pound c. and as my report saith the Plaintiffe vpon non assumpsit pleaded had verdict and iudgement in the Kings Bench but vpon a writ of error in Exchequer Chamber the Iudgement was reuersed for that the Marriage was executed before the promise made and yet the declaration supposed that the Defendant requested the Plaintiffe to Marriage c. But let me not run so farre from my Tert as neuer to finde the way backe againe A man may sue for Marriage money in his owne name onely and so is it generally where that which is in demand or to be recouered commeth méerely and onely to the Baron Example 43. Ed. 3. fo 8. The Earle of Arundell brought a Writt of Trespasse against one for chasing in a free Chace that he held in right of his Wife and the Writt awarded good though the Wife were not named in it because nothing was to be recouered by damages Likewise is it if the Baron bring a Writt of Trespasse for strayes taken in Lands holden in right of his Wife And eod anno fo 26. for breaking of a house and carrying away of timber the Husband alone shall haue the action because hee may when hee list pull downe a house or sell timber standing vpon his Wiues Inheritance or make a release to any body vpon such manner of trespasse and the Wiues action is gone for euer There is also the same yeare fo 16. another Case wherein because a decies tantum was brought by Baron and Feme the Writt abated for though the first action concerned the Wiues Interest yet nothing is to be recoueredin a decies tantum but damages c. Sée the Booke of 20. H. 6. fo 1. a Writt of maintenance wherein nothing is recouerable but damages was brought by Baron and Feme vpon maintenance in a bill of fresh force against them by the better opinion they might ioyne c. And the Defendant passeth Ouster but not by award 41. Ed. 3. f. 9. a Writ of Champertie brought by the Baron onely vpon an assise which had passed against him and his wife was allowed good notwithstanding exceptions taken of the wiues Interest c. vpon the reasons before expressed And by Finch if a man haue a Ward in right of his Wife Dower shall be demanded against him onely because the gard is a Chattell vested But if a Writt of Wardship be to be brought it shall be against the Baron and feme c. because of voucher And in trespasse if the Plaintiffe recouer against Baron and Feme by false verdict they both must wyne in the attaint for that must be according to the record 46. Ed. 3. fo 20. a man brought a Writt of rauishment de gard declaring vpon a possession iure vxoris and the Writ held good yet in this case there is more then damages to be recouered for the Plaintiffe shall haue the Infant restored by the very words of his Writt But there againe it was agréed that an action to recouer a Ward must be against them both because of voucher though in a writt of Dower it be vt supra because therein there is no voucher c. If Baron and Feme sell the Wiues Inheritance by fine for twenty pound an action of debt for the money shall bee brought by the Baron onely for the grant was onely the Barons grant and if he die the Executors shall haue the action and not the Feme 48. Ed. 3. fo 18. And a repleâ—â—n must bee brought by the Baron onely because a Feme Couert cannot haue a propertie in any goods or Chattels But for such goods as the Wife hath as Executrix it séemeth the Baron and Feme may ioyne in ar pleuen so shall they for goods of the Wife taken dum sola fuit Fitz. in the title reception In trespasse at Common Law or vpon the Statute Anno 5. Rich. 2. the Baron alone shall haue action of trespasse and so likewise for taking away Charters concerning the Wiues inheritance So is it if he alone deliuer such Charters he alone may haue action against the Bayliffe c. But a Writt of Detinue of Charters of the Wiues inheritance must be sued by both c. because the Charters themselues are to be recouered And therefore vpon recouery of them the Baron and Feme must ioyne for recouery A quare impedit was brought 50. of Ed. 3. fo 13. and the Baron declared of an agréement betwixt thrée Sisters to present by turne to a Church whereof they had the Aduousan and this was the turne of his Wife c. The Defendant demands Iudgement of the Writt because the Wife being still aliue was not named but this Writt also was awarded good because nothing was to be recouered here but onely the Presentment and not the Aduousan And if a Writt should be awarded to the Bishop against the Baron the Wife thereby should not be out of possession because she is not partie to the Iudgement besides that she is ayded by West 2. cap. 3. And for a generall rule where the Husbands release is good the action may be brought in his name onely as vpon cutting of trées grasse Corne c. And such actions may be brought in the name both of the Husband and the Wife An assise of â—arraigne presentment is a mixt action and the Aduousan it selfe shall be recouered in it therefore of necessity it must be brought both by Baron and Feme 15. Ed. 4. fo 9. The Baron Seignior in right of his wife ioyned in a writt of rescous and it was argued that he alone ought to haue brought the writt But it was awarded well brought by them both Though per Littleton it were good enough in nosme le Baron tantum And per Pigot when an obligation is made to Baron and Feme the Baron alone may haue the action or they may ioyne â—adem lex in trespasse c. maintenance c. for alwayes where the action may suruiue to the wife the wife may ioyne in the writt They which shall read these two last Cases argued 50. Ed. 3. and 15. Ed. 4 in the yeares at large shall not néed to repent it SECT XLII When a Wife may sue or be sued alone IT is seldome almost neuer that a marryed woman can haue any action to vse her writt onely in her owne name her husband is her sterne her primus motor without whom the cannot doe much at home and lesse abroad But if her Huusband commit felonie take the Church and abiure the Realme she is now in case as a Widdow inabled to make alienation of her owne land as a Feme sole or to bring a cui in vita for
a man and his wife be bound by Obligation a Writ against them both vpon that Obligation shall abate car fait del Feme couert est void See 15 Ed. 4 fol. 10. that if an Obligation bee made to Baron and Feme and the husband dieth the wife or husbands Executor which of them shall hap to haue the Obligation shall sue c. as it is said by Bryan And Detinue of Charters shall bee brought by Baron and Feme for Charters concerning her ioynt possession 38. H. 6. fol. 25. If Baron and Feme make a Lease for yeares of the wiues lands they must ioyne in an action of waste or else the Writ shall abate 7. H. 4. 15. yet 3. H. 6. fol. 53. a Writ of waste so brought was doubted of because forsooth a Feme couert cannot make any Lease But at the last the Writ was holden good for the wife might accept the rent or distraine for it and make auowrie after the husbands death at what time and not before shee hath power to agree or disagree but during the Couerture the lease was the Act of them both baron feme tenants for yeares may ioyne in an Action of couenant against the Lessor that outeth them for the wife suruiuing shall haue the terme if the husband doe not aliene 47. of Ed. 3. fol. 12. And where a remainder is to bee executed to a Feme couert by force and conueyance of a fine c. the Baron and Feme may haue a Scire facias to shew why the land should not remaine to I. S. and to N. his wife for the land cannot remaine to one of them but it must remaine to them both But a Formidon in Discender or Reuerter or a Writ of Escheat differeth 11. H. 4. fol. 15. 44. Ed. â— fol. 10. a Writ of Dower was brought by Baron and feme and the tenant pleaded that the former baron had neuer any thing in the land during the espousals which the Demandants did not deny therefore the Tenant prayed they might be barred and their confession recorded but it would not be granted because it should bee preiudiciall to the wife yet at the request of the Tenant they were receiued to acknowledge their right by fine and the woman was examined Quod nota for she shall not be examined vpon confession of an Action SECT XLVI Actions against Baron and Feme AS Actions are rightly puâ—sued by Baron and Feme when right is withholden from her or wrong done to her selfe her interest or possession so when the wife is or is supposed a wrong doer or her husband doth wrong vnder pretext of her interest writs must be sued against them both for as it hath béene shewed already if a Feme couert bee condemned in any ciuill Action without her husband she and her husband may haue a Writ of error Therefore if a woman which is indebted take a husband an Action of Debt shall be against her and her husband in the Debent 9. E. 4. fol. 24. 7. H. 7. fol. 2. agréeth and if any thing were owing to the Feme before marriage the Writ of such a debt shall bee Quasâ—is debet If a man baile goods to a Feme sole which marrieth afterward an Action of Detinue shall be against her and her husband for these goods per curiam 39. Ed. 3. 17. And 1. H. 4. fol. 31. a Writ of trespasse sur le case was brought for not repairing certaine bankes vpon lands which the defendant had in Dale by reason wherof the plaintiffes ground was surrounded and because the Defendants whole interest in Dale was only jure vxoris which wife was not named in the Writ it abated for they ought to haue béen ioyned 3. H. 4. fol. 1. Upon a Lease made to Baron and Feme for yeares rendring rent the Lessor brings a Writ of Debt c. against Baron and Feme and Iudgement was asked of the Writ because it was not brought against the Baron onely Thiâ—â—ing holdeth the Writ good aswell as an Action of waste shall bee against both Baron Feme vpon such a Leafe and so doth one other Iustice but some pleaders argued contra And in Actions against Baron and Feme the woman must be named wife 42. Edw. 3. fol. 23. A writ of trespasse is brought against Iohn and Alice with others Alice saith shee was and is the wife of Iohn iour del briefe purchase iudgement del briefe and this is a good plea in abatement of the writ So if a writ be against Iohn and Alice his wife Alice if shée be single may plead not the wife Iudgement del briefe But Iohn shall not haue that plea per totam curiam for none as Brooke maketh the reason shall plead Misnosmer but the partie 7. H. 6. fol. 9. In Assise against Baron and Feme the Uicount returned that hee had attached the Baron per centum ones matrices but the wife had nothing to be attached of within his Bâ—â—liwicke heâ— eâ—â— in eádem inuenta the best opinion is that the returne is not good for he was commanded to attach the wife which the Law would neuer command if the thing were impossible but it is possible enough for the wife to be attached by her husbands goods and by him shee must bee brought into the Court. Babington saith an Attachment must bee by a meere chattle which shall be forfeited by Default but not by any Chattell reall as a Lease for yeares or a ward or by appartell c. Now note it hath béene said that in an Action of debt or trespasse or other personall Actions if the Baron appeare and the wife make default or if the wife appeare and the baron make default they shall not answer the one without the other 44. Ed. 3. fol. 1. A writ of debt was brought against Baron and Feme the wife outlawed the Baron rendred himselfe at the Exigent at returne whereof hee appeared in ward and the Plaintiffe prayed because the Processe was determined against the wife that the husband might answer sed non alocatur But sée in the next lease a writ of trespasse pursued against Baron and Feme to the Exigent the Uicount returned that hee had taken them at the day the Baron came inward without the wife c. The Plaintiffe declared against him he was compelled to answer and pleaded not culpable le Vicont fuit charge de le corps le Feme amercâ—e and a writ went out to haue the wife at Westminster at a certaine day with a Venire facias betwixt the Plaintiffe and the husband returnable the same day sée 34. H. 6. fol. 29. A writ of trespasse against Baron and Feme and the Baron as seruant to the Chancellor brought a Superâ—edeas for himselfe and his wife Littleton said it was to be allowed for neither of them no more than where trespasse is brought against one of the Chancery and another man c. Nay not so much saith Prisot for in that case the
vpon the first maineprise or a new scire facias by new maineprise neither of them might be allowed without his wife yet it was agréed that if two men were outlawed one might sue pardon and scire facies without the other for in that case the one may plead alone vpon the first originall without his fellow against whom the processe is determined but the Baron cannot plead here without his wife sée the booke 11. H. 4. fo 89. Baron and Feme being outlawed the wife appeared and brought a Charter of pardon shee was suffered to goe at large but the pardon might not bee allowed because the baron appeared not and the wife could not plead without him 14. â— 6. fo 14. Iune said that one kinde of diuorce betwixt baron and feme is when an action of trespasse is brought against them and the baron only appearing processe goes out against the wife till she be waiue c. Shee can neuer purchase her pardon vnlesse her husband appeare so that if he will he is diuorced The like subtilty hath M. Littleton 13. Ed. 4. fo 4. where he affirmes that if a woman be outlawed by erronious processe if the husband will not bring a writ of error hee may so be rid of a shrew for that counteruailes a diuorce 11. H. 4. Sheweth that a woman may be suffered to goe at large though her pardon bée not allowed till her husband appeare with her c. And sée Dyer 10. Eliz. 271. In debt against baron and feme processe was continued till the baron was outlawed and the wife waiue afterward the wife came in ward by processe brought the queenes pardon for her waiuery Though the pardon could not bée allowed because the wife without the husband could not sue scire facias against the platntiffe to make him declare vpon the first originall for the pardon had a condition in law ita quod ipsa staret recta in curia which shée could not doe alone yet by the opinion of the Court shée was to bee discharged of the imprisonment I thinke the shrew went home But that a woman outlawed by her selfe alone for an offence touching her in an action brought against her husband and her and the husband appeared before outlagary was discharged of her imprisonment vpon sight of her pardon I find not here nor no where else and therefore it may be M. Iunes way will serue sometime to bee rid of a shrew and that by a like manner a woman may be voided of a slouin or vncumbred of a Churle An action of trespasse is brought against baron and feme and the baron outlawed the wife appearing at the exigent goeth sanâ—iour if a capias vtlagatum lay hold of the husband I perceiue not well how he can get loose without his dames fauour SECT L. Of Diuorce BVt it is time to make an end of marriage since wee are come to matter of diuorcement of which I reckon this of outlary for none 47. Ed. 3. in the very end of the yéere setteth downe flue wayes Causa professionis Causa pcontractus Causa consanguinitatis causa affinitatis and Causa frigiditatis with an obseruation that when diuorce is Causa professionâ—â— the wife shall be indowed and the heire inherit contra in al the residue â—mmaturiâ—iâ— also or miâ—oritie of age at the time of espoâ—sals may be one cause of diuorce As â—9 Ed. 3. fo 32. Iohn Alice his wife brought an assise the Tenant said that Alice had sued diuorce in the Archbishoprick of Barwicke because she was vnder age of consent tempore sponsaliuÌ„ neuer consenting afterward and diuorce was had iudgement del briefe And Broke titulo garde 124. remembreth that 5. Ph. Mar. the Doctors of Law declared for diuorces vpon this case That if an heire or other body be married infra annos nubiles and doe disassent at the age of discretion or after before assent to marriage it is sufficient and the party may be wedded to some other body without either diuorce or testimony of the disagréement before the ordinary who though hee may punish ê‘ arbitrium Iudicis here yet the second espousals are good by Law of both Realme and Church But when diuorce is had for kindred praecontract frigiditie or such like case the Law is cleane contrary for tryall of diuorce when it is pleaded in a temporall Court must bee by certificate of the Bishop and not ê‘ pais 5. Hen. 4. fol. 2 and sentence of diuorce belongeth to the Bishop in his spirituall Court Of which there is authority 2. Eliz. 179. in Dyer This yéere he saith sentence of diuorce was giuen Causa frigiditatis naturalis in the Archbishops Court of Audience and the woman was actrix querulans de impotentia proâ—râ—andiâ—â— viâ—o who was adiudged impotent by the Physitians The same yéere or next yéere another case and iudgement hapned like and the woman which complained married to a second husband of better stuffe by whom she had children and gaue him all her land by fine c. her first husband also was married to another woman and had children by his second wife vt asserebatur in which case the Doctors held that the parties diuorced were compellable to liue againe together vt vir vxor quia sancta Ecclesia decepta fuit in Iudicio priori Therefore much adoe was made to stay the ingrossing of the fine yet the Iustices made it be ingrossed contra mandaâ— domÌ„ Custodis c. But sée Sir Edw. Cokes 5. Report fo 98. in Buryes case that the Doctors were deceiued for the parties diuorced causa frigiditatis cannot liue together againe and the issue by the second wife is legitimate for a man may bee habilis inhabilis diuersis temporibus Againe 13. and 14. of Eliz. Dyer fol. 305. teacheth that right and lawfulnesse of marriage is euer to be iudged not by the temporall but by the spirituall Iudge And therefore in an issue of ne vnques accouple in loyall matrimonie if the Bishop certifie not the lawfulnesse of wedlocke but the circumstances hée shall be amerced and a melius certiorando awarded Séeing therefore right of marriage is to be discussed by the spirituall Iudge they which are married ought in no case to seuer themselues and remarry without the spirituall Iudge if they doe the second marriage is no marriage the children had in it are illegitimate and the woman not dowable except in the case first specified And generally where espousals are not méerely void but defiesable if they bee not auoided by diuorcement the issue which is had without defeiting that shall inherit as if a man marry his cosin or his sister saith the booke and haue issue by her and die before diuorce had now nothing can bastardize the issue for though the Commissary was wont in his visitation to make a kinde of diuorce in such cases after death of one of the parties it was neuer any more than an Inquisition of office Ad inquirendum
de peccatis for the heire could not be bastardized when the parents both or one of them were dead and therefore not citable to appeare c. And it is holden strongly by Thorpe 39. Edw. 3. and in the Parliament 24. H. 8. see Brooke titulo Bastardie 23. 37. 44. 47. And a diuorce cannot bee had but of a marriage consisting and not yet by death dissolued for there cannot wel be a reuersing of any diuorce when the parties diuorced be dead as Brooke vnderstandeth Connings by 12. H. 7. 22. for saith he it was adiudged in Coâ—bers case where the baron and feme had issue and afterward were diuorced the baron taking another wife by whom he had issue and died that when the first issue sued in spirituall Court to reuerse the diuorce and bastardize the second issue after his fathers death a prohibition lay But it was said that the title and discent were comprised in the libell or else the prohibition could not haue beene granted Thus saith Brooke titulo Deraignment But titulo Bastardy 47. hee setteth downe the same case that a man may be bastardized after the espousals wherein he was begotten and borne or by death determined Sée Sir Edw Cokes 7. report Kennes case that some diuorces dissolue the matrimony scilicet à vinculo matrimonei and bastardize the issue and â—arâ—â— the woman of her Dower and some à mensa Thoro which dissolueth not the marriage nor barre the wife of her Dower nor bastardize the issue And therefore if any action be brought and diuorce pleaded the cause of diuorce ought to bée shewed And there it is said that a diuorce may be repealed in the spirituall Court after the death of the parties but a suit after the death of the parties to diuorce them and to bastardize their issue may not be for that the triall of bastardy or not belongeth to the temporall Court originally if sentence doe not hinder And sée Sir Edw. Cokes Institut ca. Dower f. 33. ca. Estates upon condition fol. 181. the deriuation of the word diuorce à diuertendo or dinoâ—â—â—ndo quia vir diuertitur ab vxore and sée there the seuerall causes of diuorces and how for any of them respectiuely doe extend in power and effect and in Littletons tune many diuorces were of force which the Statute of 32. H. 8 cap. 8. take away and there sée that a man may marry the sister of his first wife since that Statute By Na. br â—â—l 44. in the writ of prohibition and Na. br 1â—9 and Dyer 28. H. â— 1â— agrée if the woman shall haue the goods not spent and that detinue lyes for them If goods be giuen in marriage with a woman shée shall recouer them in the spirituall Court after diuorce and there lyeth no prohibition â—6 Hen. 8. fol. 7. is that if the husband before diuorce had haue giuen or sold without collusion such goods as were the wiues before marriage she is without remedy for them being diuorced But if he aliened them by collusion and bring a writ of detinue for so much of them as the property may bée decerned of and for the residue money and such like shee shall sue in spirituall Court If a man which is bound to a woman by obligation marry her and they be diuorced she hath her action againe which was suspended ibid by Fitzh and Norwich But see the booke of 11. Hen. 7. 4. p Cur. contrary where the diuorce is causa praecontract ' and it is so cited Dyer 4. Mar. fol. 140. If the woman diuorced were an Inheritrix c. and the husband before diuorcement hath done waste felled her woods receiued her rents granted her wards presented to her Churches giuen away her goods none of these things past in possession executed can be reuersed or recalled But if the Inheritance it selfe were discontinued or charged or a release made of it or hir villaines manuâ—â—itted shée shall haue remedy for these things by common Law If baron and feme Iointpurchasers de disseised and the baron release c. the wife shall haue a moiety if they bee diuorced although before there were no moieties betwixt them for the diuorce conuert that into moieties which sée Brooke title Deraignement and diuorce 32. H. 8. In Sir Edward Cokes 5. Rep. in Olands case it was holden that if a Lease bée made to baron and feme during the Couerture and the baron soweth the land and after there is a diuorce causa praecontract the baron shall haâ—e the Corne and not the lessor for although the baron prefecuted the suit yet the sentence which dissolues the marriage is the iudgment-in Law and Iudicium redditur in â—â—ultum And as by diuorce that which was intire may bée conuerted or diuided into moeties so by it inheritance may bee made francktenement And if baron and feme donées in taile haue issue and be diuorced now they haue but francktenement and the issue shall not inherit for it is not like here as where lands are giuen to two men or â—o a man and his mother or to a man and his daughter and to the heires of their bodies where seuerall heires shall seuerally inherit for it was neuer lawfull for them to marry 7. Hen. 4. 16. Brooâ— 9. in titulo Taile sée also 13. Edw. 3. titulo Deraignment If land be giuen to baron and feme in taile which be diuorced causa praecontract c. they shall hold ioyntly for terme of their liues and the land goe to the Suruiuor But by the Reporter if the gift were in franckmarriage the party which did not cause the diuorce shall haue all and agreeing to that difference is Perk. Chap. feoffement Sect. 238. and also agréeing is Sir Edw. Cokes 9. Rep. in Beamonts case 12. Assisar p. 22. Dorees in franckmarriage were diuorced at the womans suit the baron continued possession till he died and afterward the womandied the possession was adiudged to haue remained alwayes to the woman because shee neuer made any debate for it so that the man neuer had it by disseisin and agréeing to that is Plowden Wymbysses case fol. 58. Dyet 3. M. fol. 126. 19. Assisar plac 2. The Doâ—â—e in franckmarriage wedded infra annus nubiâ—es sued diuorce by the barons motiue and the wiues agréement at their full age and the woman recouered all the land against her quondam husband by assise And Titulo Assise in Fitzh pla 413. 44â— is this case A man of certaine tenements infeoffed his feoffor his wife in tayle the remainder to the right heires of the baron they were diuorced at the suit of her husband which kept the woman out of the lands and she brought an Assise whereby she recouered a moyty of the tenemen's by iudgement presently And propter difficultatem it was adiâ—rned for the other mâ—ity to the Commonpleas where shee had â—udgement of that also because diuorce was at the husbands sâ—â—t As a woman may haue an Assise against her
companion diuorced for lands wherein shee claimeth inheritance or estate for life so if he haue aliened in sée â—ée tayle â—r for life the lands which he had in fée simple â—ée â—a le or for terme of life to a stranger she may as soone as she iâ— diuorced bring a Writ called a â—â—i ante diuorâ—â—â—m against the Alâ—enee And this Writ may be in the per cuâ— post If shee dye before action commenced or before recouery her heire may haue a Writ called a surâ—uranâ—e diuortium and the Aunt and Néece may joyne in iâ— But for her estate tayle her heire shal be put to a formidone But note Reader that it séemeth both the woman and her heire may enter after the Statute of 32. Hen. 8. and neuer bring Cui in vita nor sur cuim viâ—a c. for the opinion in Grenlies Case Sir Edw. Cokes 8. Rep. fol. 73. is that if the baron alien and after the wife is diuorced causa praecontract which dissolue the marriage à vinculoma rimonii the wife during the life of the husband or after his death may enter for the words of the Aâ—tare nâ— fine feâ—ffeinent c. during the Couerture betwéene them and although the Statutâ— saith But that the same wife c. that is to be intended of her which was his wife at the time of the alienation c. Note that whereas West 2. cap. â— giueth a cui in vita vpon recouery by default against the husband c. shée shall haue a cuâ—â—hâ—e diuortium vpon the like â—eâ—ouery by equity extension of the Statute and the processe is summons grand cape peâ—iâ— cape I wil here set the bounds and limits of my third booke not because this sequell and consequence â—iuorte I meane whereby the issue had is basâ—â—â—â—â—zed and the wâ—â—an restored to her goods and lands conforteth with the marriage so perfectly begun as I meant it for this is not the vntying of true wedlocke but rather a dissipation of marriage tainted at the beginning and in Christian Court adiudged to a â—â—llity as if it had neuer béene the Baron and Fâ—me that I hâ—â—â— spoken of all this while if they were not married in their infant loue and very first flowing age yet were they not â—rostbitten or so blasted either of them when they were young but they might well haue frâ—â—tified neither was either of them a common Law breaker intangled with promise or praecontract and as for consanguinity or affinity there was no more betwixt them than is betweene Iack Flecher and his bolt You may imagine some matter by onely imagination perhaps more visible than it could haue béene being true whereupon a publike sentence of seperation being published a Thoro mensa but then there was a monition of chast liuing and prohibition to both the parties that neither of them should flâ—â— to other marriage so long as both of them were liuing And the Author of seperation that is the party suing diuorce did put in sufficient caution to doe nothing contrary to this prohibition So that the holy liues of matrimony were not cleane broken and pulled asunder but within a yéere or two they were reconciled voluntarily of their â—wne accord And soone after so I will make it hauing the Distaffe Spindle and Shéeres all in mine owne hand the husbands life was suddenly cut off or else the wiâ—e had béene sole executrix THE WOMANS LAWYER The fourth BOOKE PAle death equo pulsans pede pauperum tabernas regnumque â—urres Death I say to whom the Poet did attribute so much power in this his verse Omnia sub leges mors vocat aâ—â—a suas hath called the husband hence left the house full of mourning and specially the wife cannot chuse but sorrow and lament If my â—oure legged beast should fall into halues the one halfe starke dead without motion or spirit and the other halfe standing still vpright senting séeing féeling gazing must it not thinke you be wonderfully astonished If an Elephant in whom as some dâ—e write is vnderstanding of his countries spéech a wonderfull memorie and recenting of things past a great delight in loue and glorie besides prudence equitie and religion should haue his head cut off his body remaining still for all that vegetable and sensitiue would he not trow yée be excéeding sorrowfull for the forgoing such an ornament I dare be bold to giue a woman as much as Pliny gaue the Elephant She hath vnderstanding and spéech firme memorie loue naturall and kindnesse desire of glorie and reputation with the accomplishment of many meritorions vertues But alas when she hath lost her husband her head is cut off her intellectuall part 〈…〉 gone the verie faculties of her soule are I will not s 〈…〉 cleane taken away but they are all be 〈…〉 ned di 〈…〉 ed and dazled so that she cannot thinke or remember when to take rest or refâ—ction for her weake body And though her spirits and naturall moysture being inwardly exhausted with sorrow and extreme griefe she be called and inforced to seeke restauration by such aliments as life is prolonged by yet is she nothing desirous of life hauing lost a moytie of herselfe yea the principall maytie now best prised and estéemed but neuer best loued Time must play the Physitian and I will helpe him a little Why mourne you so you that be widowes Consider how long you haue beene in subiection vnder the predeminance of parents of your husbands now you be frée in libertie frée propriiâ—uris at yoâ—r owne Law you may see num cap. â—0 That maidens and wiues vowes made vpon their soules to the Lord himselfe of heauen and earth were all disauowable and infringible by their parents or husbands vnlesse they ratified and allowed them either expresse or by silence at the day when such vowes came first to their notice and knowledge But the vow of a widow or of a woman diuorced no man had power to disallow of for her estate was free from controlment Must a woman néeds wéepe thus for the losse of her Buckler Shield and defence in the person of him with whom she held daily commutation of all offices proceeding from loue and superlatiue kindnesse Let her learne to cast her whole loue and deuotion on him that is better able to loue and defend her than all the men in the world Him I meane that hath forbiddâ—n to afflict widdowes or orphans with promise to heare their cries and vindicate their wrongs by killing them by the sword and making the wiues widdowes and their children fatherlesse of them which breake this Commandement Exod. cap. 22. Then because a sober carefulnesse and moderate sedulitie in businesse of profit or disprofit doth mitigate greatly the sorrowing for such actions as opinion or fancie makes thus grieuous let her looke to her affaires as cause and need requireth SECT I. Of Executorship and Administration SHe is not made an Executor because the office is troublesome let her take
infeofed with warranty hee shall not pray that she 〈…〉 ow her selfe for he may vouch the heire which Gardin 〈…〉 Chiualry cannot doe It is no good plea for Gardine in Chiualry to say the Demandant was gardian in soccage c. but hee must shew that she is gardian in soccage â—our del brief purchase and this is good till shée haue shewed by replication the land deuested from her possession If a widdow gardian in facto of some lands that were her husbands and holden in Chiualry purchase her Writ of Dower against another Gardian in Chiualry hée shall not plead the speciall matter and plead vt supra for the wardship is here to the widdowes owne vse and profit SECT VII Assignement of Dower by the King Statutum prerogatiue ca 4 fact 17. Ed. 2. THe Statute is that after the deathes of husbands which held of the King in Cap 〈…〉 the King shall assigne Dower yea although the heire be of full age Vidue si voluâ—runt And such widdowes before assignation of Dower whether the heire bee of full age or vnder shall sweare not to marry without the Kings licence If they doe marry â—aâ—â— licence the King shall take into his hands as a 〈…〉 esse all the Lâ—â—â—s and Tenements holden of him in Dower so that the woman shall take no profit of it till shee or her husband haue satisfied the Kings will by fine which was wont to be tempore regis Henrici patris regis Ed. â— â—aith the Statute at full yéerely value of the whole Dower nisi vberiorem gâ—â—â—iam habuâ—â—â—nt â—ulieres And women which bee themselues Tenants in Capite of inheritance what age soeuer they be of shall sweare likewise not to marry without the Kings licence Si fecerint terrae capâ—â—â—tur eodem modo in manus Regis c. This Statute is proued to bee but confirmation of the common Law â—4 H. 3. Prâ—rogatiue 27. iâ— Fitzheâ—â—â—rt and by â—â— Char c. 7. ul a vidua distringatur ad se â—â—â—â—tandum dummodo voluerit viuere â—â—â—e marito Ita tamen quod secuâ—itatem faciat quod se non maritabit â—ine assensu nostro si de nobis tenuerit vel sine assensu domini sui si de alio â—â—nnerit Fitzb. in natu br 263. shewes the manner of indowment by the King The widdow must come into Chancery and make oath not to marry sans licence whereupon the King may make the Assignement in the Chancery and direct his Writ to the Escheator certifying him that hee hath assigned a third part of such lands with a third part of the liberty of Court view of franckpledge c. commanding him to make liuery of the same to haue in Dower or the woman may after she hath sworne haue a writ reciting her oath and commanding the Escheator to make assignement But the most vsuall course is vt antea And the King though hee hath committed custody of lands to another person may assigne Dower to the widdow in Chancery notwithstanding and shee shall haue a Writ to the Escheator yâ—â— and the King may grant a Writ to the Escheator commanding him to take surety of the widdow not to marry sans licence and then to assigne her Dower as praecipiâ—us tibi â—â— capâ—o sacramento c. assignari libâ—â—i â—â—ciaâ— c. If the Tenant which is dead held by Chiâ—â—â—ry of some Bishopricke or such like which is in the Kings hands by vacancie the widdow must demand her Dower in Chancery and she shall haue a Writ for her Assignement to the Escheator but in this case shee sweares not to marry sans licence So is it also when Dower is demanded of laâ—â—â— holden of a common person in Chiâ—â—â—ry where the heire is in the Kings ward pâ—r â—â—nage And the King may assigne Dower in Chancery rendring rent to him because the lands assigned doe excéed a iust third part of the Tenements whereof Dower is assignable If the widdow be so weake â—â— impotent that shée cannot trauell to the Chancery to take her oath and demand Dower she may sue a speciall Writ to some person both to take her oath and to receiue Attâ—rney whom she will constitute to sue in her stead If liuery bee made to the heire being of full age with a reseruation of Dower to be assigned to the King and then the widdow commeth into the Chancery for Dower as shee must doe there shall goe a speciall Writ to the Escheator to warne the heire that he be in Chancery at a certaine day and the widdow shall bée appointed the same day to receiue her Assignement But if the Writ of Liuery directed to the Escheator bée generall without clause of salua doâ—a per nos assigâ—anda the widdow must now â—â—â— for her Dower by Writ of Dower against the heire If the King when he makes liuery reserues Assignement of Dower to himselfe in his Writ to the Escheator now whether the widdow come and demand dower in Chancery or demand no dower yet the reuersion is in the heire after assignement for after the death of Tenant in Dower the heire shall not 〈◊〉 any neâ— liuery Because the first writ commandâ— all the landâ— to be deliuered and so the Escheator doth deliuer all nothing being reserued to the King but onely Assignement of Dower If after this Assignement iâ—â—e â—â—râ—isâ—â— by the heire or other body that the land which the woman hath is of far greater value than it was made by the extent c. if the excesse â—e 〈◊〉 and returned â— sâ—iâ—e facias shall goe forth â—â— cause the woman to come and shew cause why she should not take a nâ—w Indowment If she appeare and cannot gaineâ—ay the matter or if she were warned and make default it séemeth in both cases she shall be endowed a new So that parcell of the lands which she hath shall be taken from her â—â— the King may if hee will make assignment altogether new by a new Writ to the Viscount If the widow after she is sworne and indowed doe marrie sans licence the King sends to the Escheator to seise those lands which she holdeth in Dower by a Writ reciting the oath the indowment and marriage with this in it Nos contemptum huâ—â—â—modi nolentes transiâ—â— impunituÌ„ necnon indeâ—â—â—â—tati nostrae volentes prospleere tibi praecipimus si ita est â—nc omnia terrâ—â— â—â—â—â—ment quae tenâ—t in Dote c. capias in man nosâ—â— Ita quod de 〈◊〉 prouenientibus nobis respondâ—â—â— ad scaccarâ—â—◠〈◊〉 quousque nobis dâ— Forisfacâ—uâ—â— ad nos inde pertinenâ— satisfactur â—uâ—rit Thus far 〈◊〉 Stamford argueth whether Fitzherbert deliuer the Law rightly or no in this that he saith the King may assigne Dower in Chancerie though hee haue committed oâ—â—â— the wardship of land to some other body for many writs are in the yeare bookes brought against the Committée in such a case And in some bookes the woman recouers Dower the King neuer being made priuie As titulo â—â—â—
del roy 23. 〈◊〉 is the case 4. H. 7. fol. â— Action of Dower was against the Kings Committée during the heires â—onage the Defendant shewed how it was foâ—â—d by office that the husbands father tenant to the King died seised hauing issue the husband which entred sans office and died leauing his heire vnder age all which matter was 〈◊〉 by office whereupon the King seised committed the lanâ— to the Defendant c. Iudgement â—â— actione And the widdow was adiudged dowable Bryâ—â— who at the first was in minde to proceed no further without â—â—d of the King when hee had considered the Statute de Bigamis cap. 3. awarded presently that the woman should recouer Dower The Statute is Vbi custodes hereditatis mariâ—orum suoâ— cuiâ—â—dias habent ex dono vel concessâ—â—ne regis â—â—ue custodes â—â—â—um petitarum â—eneaâ—â— â—iue heredes dictorum â—â—â—â—menâ—orum vocentur ad warrantiam si excipiant quod sine regâ— respondere non possuâ—â— non ideo â—â—persedâ—â—tur quâ—â— in loâ—â—elâ—â—dicta proâ—â— iustus fuerit procedaturâ— Stamford noteth some bookes wherein is â—ound that heâ—reâ— in costodie of Committâ—â—s vouched to Warrantie haue come in and had aid of the King directly contrarie to this third Chapter de Bigaâ—is But whether the Kings grant in those cases were Durante 〈◊〉 or Durante bene placito it appeares not in the â—ookes and that makes a great difference Likewise if the Writ of Dower â—e 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Committée of a Committee And if Wardship â—â— committed to the widdow without exception or foreprize of Dower she is concluded to claime any Dower during the Wardship In Stamfords opinion the new 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the case supra 4. H. 7. doe not agrée Howbeit for â—hy part â— finde not the repugnanâ—ie for as the King may assigne Dower to his widdowes though the heirâ— be of full â—ge Vidâ—a si voluerit so Fitzhorbeâ—â— saith hee may assigne Dower if he will though he haue committed the laâ—â—â—â— And this doth not denie but rather affirme that â—â— some case the Committée may assigne Dower If the Committée as Stamford himselfe confesseth assigne Dower to one that is not dowable or if his assignation excéed iust measure the King may reforme it And if a womâ—n â—â—dowed by the Kings Committée will marrie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because she stands vnâ—worâ—e for in the Câ—mmâ—â— plaâ—e is no â—wearing in this point her â—â—nds are neuer â— whitlesse subiect to â—eizure for the contempt therefore in the end he conclâ—deth that where â—â—ard is omitted ouer the woman hath election whether 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 â—â—â— to â—he King in Chanâ—erie or at Common Law against the Committée vnlesse it be where the grant of a Ward is but Duâ—anâ—e bene placito for in that case of necessitie the suit must be to the King Sâ—â— Sir 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fol. â—8 the reason why a Writ of Dower is maintenable against the Committee of the King Stamford thâ—â—â—teth Fitzherbert also in that that hée saith a widdow must demand Dower against the heire which hath Liueâ—â—â— without clauâ—â—â—◠〈◊〉 dote pâ—â—â—â—â— assigâ—andâ— for when Liueâ—â—â— is before Assignement of Dower there is commonly a sauing in the Writs of Liuerie if so be the woman were found to be wise c. by the office And if she be not found by the Inquisition then there is a leauing out of Salâ—a Dote c. in suing of generall Liuerie Indeed if she were not found to be the Kings Tenants wise in the office the heire may safely sâ—e Liuerie within 〈…〉 such saying But 〈…〉 agrees with Oâ—slow P 〈…〉 32. in the case of Mynes that for Assignation of Dower if the King haue not expressely relinquâ—shed it though the Liuerie be sâ—mâ—â—lâ—â—se of salua Dote c. yet this makes no such waiâ—ing of the prerogatiue but that the King may assigne Dower to a widdow that by an office is found to haue beene wife to the Kings Tenant at the time of his death for without so much it seemes she can neither demand it in Chancerie of the King nor of the Committee nor of the heire in the Common place quere vide fol. 109. Prerogatiue of not assigning The King hath a prerogatiue aswell of not assigning as of assigning Dower As if the husbands Feoffee in a writ of Dower against him call to Warrantie the heire in the wardship of the King c. the woman shall recouer against the Tenant and no recouerie shall be as yet against the heire But neither any common person nor yet the Kings Committee of wardship shall haue this prerogatiue But for the King himselfe if in the case Iudgement to recouer is value be giuen for the Tenant he must stay for execution till the Kings hands be amoued c. If a woman be endowed by her husbands Feoffee of such lands as the husband did not die seised of whereof also for this reason the King can haue no wardship Stamfords opinion is that she cannot marrie sâ—ns licence For by â—6 Assisarum Pl. 57. it appeareth that where a woman was endowed by Gardian in Chiualrie who was afterward attainted of treason and his Seigniorie forfeited to the King she must hold now of the King and not of the heire which was in reuersion of the land Hee accords with Fitzherbert that the Statute of Prerogatiue is vnderstood onely of lands holden in capite and therefore she must demand Dower of lands holden of a Bishoprick or of Tenant in capite when the temporalities or the heire are in Custodia regis she must be indowed in Chancery but she may marrie when she list and shall take no oath to the contrarie Also if a widdow will relinquish her Dower of lands holden in capite she may marrie â—ans licence And see Dyer 3. M. 123. b. affirmeth that the wife of Tenant parauaile shall not be sworne as widdow of the King in the Chancery when her Dower is assigned to her The reason per Stamford is the copulatiue connexion of Et si se maritauerit to the former words of the Statute of demanding Dower and swearing not to marrie The words si viduae voluerint he takes to imply no more but election of refusall or taking of Dower and that is manifest by the last clause of the Statute But by Fitzherberts writ which hee sets downe for forme of seisure when a widdow is married sans licence it appeares that the King may grant to another the marriage of his widdow or widdowes and for marriage before agreement with such a Grantee the King may seize and composition with such a Grantee by Baron or Feme before or after marriage is as good as if it were with the King himselfe But now by the Statute 32. H. 8. cap. 46. This composition is giuen to the Master of the Wards and Liueries with three of the Councell of that Court who haue also authoritie to tax according to the Statute of Prerogatiue a reasonable fine for marriage sans licence How much it ought to be is plaine by
the Statute as also what lands are subiect to the Statute as also what lands are subiect to seisure aswell of the husbands lands as of the wiues If that were reason saith Fitzherbert a womans inheritance might be seised too Et semble a moy the King cannot grant marriage of his widdowes as he may of his wards for a widdow may remaine sole without penalite or paying for it by Mag. Chart. cap. 7. But Stamford includeth that a widdow endowed oâ— lands holden in capite by the Kings Committee or husbands heire though vnsworne is not freed from marriage sans licence for she is presently as soone as she is endowed tenant to the King and not to the heire which is in reuersion yet only the heire is he which shall haue action of waste against her but if trespasse bee done vpon the ground she may haue a writ out of Chancerie supposing entrie vpon the Kings possession And Auowrie to bee made by the King resteth onely vpon her as holdeth Wood 1. H. 7. fol. 17. and 4. H. 7. 1. Now note that Endowment in Chancerie is of such strength that be it by wrong or by right it cannot be auoyded by plea without suit in Chancerie And if it bee too little the woman must stand in her owne harmes that hath once attempted it in Chancerie bee shee within aâ—e or of full age as appeares 18. Ed. 3. fol. 29. If any office bee trauersed because the land is holden not of the King but of some other Lord who therefore hath an Ouster le maine vna cum exitibus yet Dower which is already assigned remaineth vndefeated till another suit be made in Chancerie to auoid it Yet in this case because Admeasurement is no preiudice to the King of whom the land is not holden the Lord that tendreth trauerse may haue a Writ of Admeasurement at yâ— Common Law And the heire may haue Admeasurement of Dower assigned by his Ancestor But an Abator cannot haue Admeasurement neither can Gardian in fait haue Admeasurement vpon assignment by Gardian in droit nor if the heire were at full age at his Ancestors death and died his heire being within age can the Gardian haue Admeasurement but where a woman is endowed in Chancerie and afterward the heire or some other for the King surmiseth eâ—cesse of value it may bée admeasured beginning with Scire facias as Fitzherbert hath taught supra and fol. 249. â— If the husband had l 〈…〉 in diuers Counties by reason whereof diuers writs of diem clausit extremum were awarded after his death into euerie of those Counties the widdow cannot be endowed till such time as all the writs be returned into Chancery If after she is once endowed in Chancerie her Dower be recouered from her by any title she hath no remedie but to remoue the record of this recouerie into Chancerie and then vpon the first record which sheweth that she was endowed and vpon this other of recouerie she shall haue Scire facias reciting both the records against him which is tenant of the two parts to reseise them into the Kings hands and so to bee newly endowed but not to recouer any dammages though dammages were recouered against her Lib. 43. Assisar Pl. 32. for by the latter part of the Statute Prerogatiue cap. 4. It séemeth the King hath lost his prerogatiue and that he is bound by West 1. cap. 22. Note that woman Ioynt purchaser with her husband is not within this Law to fine for her marriage when she becomes a widdow say I therefore well fare a Ioynture SECT VIII Suit for Dower at the Common Law THus we haue séene how and when a widdow muâ—â— fâ—â— for Dower in the Châ—â—â—erâ—â— viz. when either her husband died the 〈…〉 tenant in capâ—te or by â—nights seruice his heire vnder age or otherwise tenant to some other â—hole lands are in the Kings hands by vacancie or nonage of the heire But if the husband which held in Socage or by â—nights seruice not of the King did giue or alien any manâ—â—r of way his lands or were disseised of them or died sâ—isâ—â— of them The widdow if by simple demand she cannot obtaine her Dower to bee assigned her may haue a wâ—â—t of Dower Vnde nihil habet at the Common Law against him which is tenant of the Franktenement by the old Nat. breuium this writ is maintainable against him which hath possession of the land by what manner soeuer or against the Gardian in Chiualrie in this or like forme Rex Vâ—cecomiti c. command A. to render to B. which was the wise of C. â—er reasonable Dower quae ad cam contingit de libero â—enemento quoâ— fuit praedict C. sometime her late husband in D. vnde niâ—iâ—â—abet vnde queritur quod A. ei defortiat c. nisi fecerit B. fecerit tâ— securum de clamore prosequendo c. summoneas A. vt sit apud WestmÌ„ ostensurus If the Dower were ad ostium Ecclesiae or ex assensu patris or otherwise there is mention made of it in the writ In London there may be a writ from the King to the Maior and Sheriffes in these words Quod Iusticietis A. quod iuste â—â—ne delatione secundum consuetudinem ciuitatis nostrae London redd ' B. quae fuit vxor C. rationabilem dotem c. Et Iusticietis D. quod iuste c. whereby appeares that a widdow in London may haue a writ of Dower against seuerall tenents by seuerall Iusticies as well as at the Common Law seuerall Precipes against seuerall tenants all in one writ the Processe in the Common Place is summons Grand cape pettie cape in the Common Place this writ of Dower vnde nihil habet must be returned into the Kings Court Et per grand reason saith Britton cap. 10. 4. For if two or more women should striue euerie of them affirming her selfe to be the lawfull wife of him which is dead not minding to be buried with him as is the corse in India but to get a third of his lands This must be tried by Certificate from the Bishop vnto whom if any but the King should write for the deciding of debate it might fall out to be all in vaine because none hath power but the King to compell the Bishop to make Certificate In the next Chapter Britton sheweth that if the Tenant vouch to warranty one which appeareth according to summons the Plea shall proceed betwixt the Plaintiffe the Warrantor or Vouchée the Tenant keeping seisen till the Warrantie be determined Then if the Garrantie cannot be denied nor the womans right disproued if that which she demandeth were certainly assigned to her for Dower from her husband shee shall recouer against the Tenant Et le renant le value But if the demand bee of no other than reasonable Dower the woman shall recouer in value against the Warrantor and the Tenant shall hold his land in peace If so be
That the Charters ought to concerne the land whereof Dower is demanded and not other lands descended to the heire 2. He that pleads that plea ought to shew the certainty whereof a certaine issue may be ioyned or that they are in a chest or box sealed which import sufficient certainty whereof certaine issue may be taken and in both cases action of detinue may be brought by the heire 3. No stranger although that he bée Tenant of the land and hath the euidences conueyed vnto him may plead in a Writ of Dower deteiner of Charters but that plea is only in prinity for the heire of the husband Also the heire shall be in the degrée of a stranger in fiue cases First if the heire hath the land by purchase Secondly if the heire hath deliâ—eâ—ed the Charters to the wife Thirdly so the heire be not immediate vouchee namely by the Tenant in the Writ of Dower but by his vouchée Fourthly if the heire comes in as vouchée hauing no lands in the County where the land is demanded Fifthly if he comes in as Tenant by receit And Gardian in Chiualry may not plead deteinement of Charters for hée may not conclude his plea if the Demandant will deliuer to him the Charters c. for the Charters which concerne the heritage of the heire shall not be deliuered to the Gardian as it is adiudged in 10. Edw. 3. 49. SECT XI Deteining of the heire AS the heire only may deteine Dower for deteining of euidence so the Gardian in Chiualry onely may deteâ—â—â— Dower for deteining the heire and that he may plead and conclude qÌ„ il ad en touts temps prist for the ward belongeth to him If a widow eloigne the infant or heire of her husband though some other body haue him by her deliuery yet the Gardian in Chiualry may detaine Dower except shee can redeliuer him to the Gardian in as good plight as hée was at the time of the eloigâ—ment that is vnmarried if he were eloigned vnmarried But a woman nourishing her owne Infant the sonne or heire which her husband left her if a stranger clauning as Gardian fake him from her the right Lord shall not detaine dower for this cause But if a woman take and remoue the heire from the place where hee was nourished at time of the Barons death Now if a stranger wrongfully take him from her the true and right Gardian may detaine dower And this matter is pleadable by Gardian in Chiualrie though hée come into Court by reason that the heire is vouched to be in his ward for by right the custodie of the Infant can appertaine to none but to him vnlesse it be by his grant or agréement Certaintie is required in pleading of this detainer aswell as in the other viz. that she which demandeth dower hath eloigned or detained I. S by name son or daughter W. c. 22. H. 6. fol. 16. 2. H. 7. fol. 6. SECT XII Possession in the Demandant 39. Ed. 3. 17. DOwer was demanded a third part of a carue of land the tenant said the demandant her selfe was seised of a third part of it already Iudgement de briefe per Knyuet it was no good plea without shewing who assigned it or that she recouered it For if shee were in by disseisen shee must haue dower of the other two parts remaining neuerthelesse by which the tenant was chased to answer for the two parts 7. oâ— H. 6. 33. 34. In action of dower against tâ—â— one said he had assigned rent out of the land six shillings and eight pence annuall to the demandant for terme of her life which she accepted c. The other pleaded touâ—s tâ—mps prist c. The assignment was holden a good plea c. the demandant said she neuer agreed Now per Strange she was to recouer a moytie maintenant though the other plea were not yet tried for this was a confession of one and pleader in bar of the other 2. H. 4. fol. 7. A Lady sued in Chancerie to be endowed of diuers Mannors which were her husbands where the heire was in gard of the King as was found by the Diem clausit extremum there returned and because it appeared that King Richard had committed wardship of the lands and body of the heire till full age of the said heire to her by patent without foreprise or mention of dower shée was ousted of dower per agard de toutes les Iustices till full age of the heire simile 11. of H. 4. in case of the Lady Arrundell Fitzherbert saith likewise If a woman take a lease for yeares of land whereof she is dowable she shall not sue for Dower during these yeares Nat. br 149. c. Bracton propoundeth to be considered what shall be done when the widdow brings her Writ of Dower vnde nihil habet and yet it is so that she hath part of her Dower already If saith he it be proued or she cannot deny it cadit breue and she shall not recouer the residue but by Writ de recto de dote Therefore let her accept no part of her Dower before she purchase her Writ and let it containe all the Deforcers be they in one Countie or in many When they are so put together if now she accept any thing of her Dower without Iudgement the acceptation of part shall be no exception against her for she may confesse satisfaction for that part If peraduenture shee haue already taken part of her Dower from some one person before the obtaining or purchase of her Writ let his name and the summons for him be in the Writ notwithstanding and then if it be obiected she hath accepted part shee may acknowledge that hee hath satisfied her for his part and whether before or after suit is not greatly to be stood vpon But if he of whom she receiued part be not named in the Writ she cannot against the obiection of acceptance reply that the land which she accepted is not in the same Towne but in another For vnde nihil habet in the Writ non debet referri ad villas sed ad dotem It is nothing worth therefore to say she hath nothing in tali villa if she hath any thing nomine dotis wheresoeuer it be it is not then materiall And when a woman replyeth nihil habet her defence shall not be per legem that is wager of Law but per patriam Likewise if a woman plead that she hath nothing nomine dotis but by some other title as ratione custodiae huiusmodi Inquisition may be in the Countie where it is supposed shee receiued Dower to finde whether shée haue any thing in Dower of the tenements which were her husbands and if shée had and now hath not to enquire what is become of it this was a Norâ—â— case of Holda the late wife of W. in Trinitie Terme 4. H. 4. as Bracton in his fourth Booke 13. Chapter and fol. 312. relates vnto me SECT XIII Ne
habet in the other Writ for hee â—aith where a woman that hath recouered part of her dower of one Tenant already demands the reâ—nant against the same Tenant in the same Towne because the words vnde nihil habet will not seâ—ue this Writ de recto de doâ—â— is vsed of necessity and is directed to the heires Gardian if he be in ward or to the heire himselfe or to a deforcour And some say that a woman losing her dower by default in a praecipe quod reddat she shall recouer by this Writ de recto de dote by the opinion of some But it séemes shée may haue a quod ei deforceat by equity the Statute W. 2. cap. 4. Whereas before shee had no â—â—â—edy but by this Writ or by action of deceipt if shée were not summoned Fitzherbert holdeth also if a woman lose her dower by assise or other action tryed sheâ— may haue an attainte but not this Writ de recto for the land was assigned her once to hold in dower and by that title she had possession so that that title est execute and so she ought to sue an action of her owne possession if shee bee deforced and not demand dower againe quaere The forme is Praecipimus tibi vt plenum rectum â—â—neas B. quae fuit vxor C. de tertia parte decem acrâ—rum cum pertinentiis in D. quam claâ—at tenere de te in dote ê‘ liberum seruitium tertiae partis vnius denarii per annum c. And this Writ may bee of the moity of land according to the custome c. or of the profitâ— of an office Fitzherbert sets downe one for example Rex Andreae salutem we command you that you yéeld vnto B. which was wife of â— her full right and third part of the profits issuing of the Custody of Westm Abbay goale with a third part of thrée Acres aâ—rable of one rood of meadow of bread meat and bottles of ale weekly c. which shee claimeth as belonging to the francktenement which shee holds of you in dower c. by frée seruice and bearing a third part of cost and charge towards the kéeping the goale and gate of the Abbey aforesaid c. whereof you your selfe deforce her hereby appeareth plaine that a woman deforced from any thing appendant or appertenant to dower assigned her may haue remedy by Writ de recto de dote The old na bre notes that of a Bailiwicke or any such office in fée which a woman may execute her selfe or make substistute or deputy of it she shall haue dower but not of Stewardship or Marshalship of England And of a common of beasts without number a woman is not dowable 9. H. 7. 4. Park Sect. 341. And of an vse before the Statute of 27. Hen. 8. of vses shee was not dowable as it is said in Vernons ca. Sir Edward Cokes 4. Rep. fol. 1. And of an annuity shall bee no dower but of prediall tithes dower shal be as appeares by the Countesse of Oxfords Case cited in Harpurs Case in Sir Edw. Cokes 11. Rep. fo 256. The paroll or plea is sometimes remoued in this Action As if the Writ be to the husbands heire which heire being himselfe Tenant of the Land will not doâ— right the Demandant may haue out a pone to remoue the matter straightway from the heires Court into the Common place but a tolt to remoue it first into the County for the originall is nisi feceâ—â—s vicecomes faciet and from thence it may bée remoued by the Plaintiffe to the Common place by a pone without any cause mentioned in the Writ But the Tenant in a droit patent cannot remoue the Plea out of the County without shewing case in the pone yet as well in a Writ de recto de dote as in a Writ of droit patent the tenant may remoue the plea shewing cause and that immediatly out of the Lords Court into the Common place by recordare and so cut of the heires Court quaere If a man seâ—l all his land and dye so that the â—eire hath nothing by discent now this Writ must be directed to the feoâ—ee of whom the widdow when shee is indowed musâ— hold as of her Lord by â—ealty But if before the Statute of quia Emptores terrarum â— if the husband â—â—â— infeofed a stranger of part of his Lands to hold of the husband c. a Writ of right of Dower must haue béene â—o the heire in whose Court the matter was to bée purâ—ueâ— by reason of the remaining Seignory So â—â— it if at thiâ— day the Baron giuâ— part of his Manor to hold in tayle But if a man giue away all his â—and to bee holden of him in tayle and dye now the Writ de recto de dotâ— must bee against the donée directed to the Sheriffe retournable in the Common place for the heire hauing only a Sâ—gniory in grosse can kéepe no Court. Anâ— in the Writ shall bee inserted quia B. capitalis dominus feodi remisit nobis curiam suam If the Baron hauing leased all his landâ— for terme of life dâ—â— c. And though there be not in Chancerie or any where elsâ— any matter wherby to proue the Lords remission of the Court yet if the Lord haue not any demesâ—â—â— whereupon to hold a Court he can haue none action against the Demandant for the â—alse suppâ—sall or â—urmise nor let nor hinder the procéedings in Common place But if he had a Court to hold plâ—a in and did not remit his Court to the King he may haâ—â— prohibition to the Iustices commanding theâ— not to proâ—éed any further But saith Nat. Breu. quaere of that matter And sâ—e Plowd fol. 74. â— where the Lord hath a Court and he will remit his Court his Certificate must bée to the King in his Chanceriâ— and thereupon a Writ of right shall be returnable in the Court of Common Pâ—eaâ— In the Common Place when the plea is remoued thither your processe is Grand câ—pe and Petit cape In the Lords or heires Court is vsed firâ—â— a precept in nature of sâ—mmâ—â—â— and of a Grand cape and Petit cape And note that in this writ if â—â—◠〈◊〉 appeare they neuer procéed to grand 〈◊〉 or trâ—â—ll by battaile from which the 〈◊〉 is exâ—â—pâ—ed and so â—â—â—â—â—quently here is neuer per Brâ—cton any Eâ—soine de malâ— lecti But the tenant may â—â—â—â—h his 〈◊〉 if â—â— haue any And after the woman hath maâ—â— hâ—◠〈◊〉 or demâ—â—â— pursuing hâ—r writ the tenant may in 〈…〉 say that â—â—ee rendred she land to hiâ— of hâ—r owne accord Or if she said he disseised her of her Dower he may pleaâ—â—â—â— Relege saith Bracton Et poâ—â—riâ—â—â—ritas per patriam dâ—clarari SECT XIX What thingâ— shall be assigned in Doâ—â—â— c. WHen Iudgement is giuen in curia regis against the tenant either vpon his default at the Grand cape returned or vpon confession or issue tried the chiefe
by such meanes as she may from him which recouered it 50. Ed. 3. fol. 7. loane late wife of L. W. brought her Writ of dower against T. H. demanding the third part of a Mannor It was pleaded Qâ—â—â—l ne poâ—â—nâ—â—s demander for â—â—no 12. huius â—â—gis a sine was leuied of the said Mannor betwixt I. and E. and the tenant sued Scâ—â—â— facias out of the fine against the now demandant which came and pleaded to parcell that shee held it in Dower of indowment from her husband bâ— assignment of W. C. â—â—â—â—â—â—dâ— dâ— lâ—â— c. for another part she claimed for terme of â—er life by lease from W. C of whom likewise shee prayed aid and had it granted C came in by procâ—sse and ioyning in aid pleaded a Feoffment made to himselfe in fée by L. the baron sonne and heire to I. W. whereunto the tenant pleaded Râ—â—ns passâ— per lâ— fait and the processe câ—ntinued against the Iury till a day certaine at which day C. made default and this demandant maintained the issâ—â— which was found against the now demandant viz. that Rieâ—s passa per le fait and execution awarded for the plaintiffe in the Scire fac Iudgemeâ—t si â—â—countâ—r ceâ—â— recoueâ—â—e a quel el fuit party el poâ—t nens demander and the demandant demurred Her pretence was that by the recoâ—erie she was remitted to her action paramont because the recouerie affirmes her husbands possession But the better opinion was that whâ—n her Dower once lawfully assâ—gned was recouered against her she had here no remedy but by exrour or attaint for a writ of right shee might not haue But if in the Scirâ— faciâ—s shée had alleaged to that part which she claimed in Dower that she hâ—ld it in Dower of the Assignment of W. C. Prist daâ—tenderâ— a qâ—e le coâ—rt voâ—â—â—â— gâ—rder she had saued her estate by protestation and the reuersion might hâ—ue héene iudged to him which had right whereas pleading as she did some thought shâ—â— had forfeited hâ—â— Dower but that was denyed by Tresiliâ—n Belkâ—ap who said that when one is â—â— per tort as iâ— the Disseâ—sée or his heirs â—nter vpon him which is in by discenâ— or if a widdow enter vpon a discontinâ—â—â— of her husband and then vpon issue taken sur seisin or disseisiâ— it is found for the plaintiffe the tenant is remitted to his Action paramoâ—â— Briefe â— â—â—triâ— in the one case and in the other a Cuâ— in vâ—â—a But if a recouerie bée against a Tenant that hath rightfull possession the remâ—die must be by errours attaint or writ of right And therefore in the last cases if the tenants had pleadedâ— release or other matter which might eâ—tinct the right if it had passed againâ—â— them their reâ—edy must haue béene by writ of right pâ—â— Clopâ—on quâ—â—â—e Wich said if a recouerie be had against the Baron vpon a delatory plea as noâ—tâ—nure misâ—osmâ—â— of the town or such like a woman may falsifie such a recouerie in a writ of Dower It seemes to be otherwise saith Brooke if a recouerie be had in that mannâ—r agaâ—â—â—â— the woman her selfe who is endowed SECT XXI Admeasurement of Dower ADmeasurement is in a kinde a recouerie against a woman not of her whole Dower but of part of it for if the heire whilest hée is vnder age or the Gardian whilest the heire is in ward doe indow a widdow of more land than â—he ought to hold in Dower the heire when hee commeth to full age may haue a writ Dâ—â—â—mâ—nsurâ—tione doâ—is against her and the Surpluâ— or excesse shall be restored to the heire but there is in this case onely an amputation without any nouell assignment If the heire being vnder age assigne Dower too largely before his Lord and Gardian enter into the land or seise his Ward the Gardian may haue a writ of Admeasurement by West 2. cap. 7. And if the Gardian pursue the writ faintly against the wâ—man indowed the heire may haue a writ of Admeasurement bâ— the same Statute Custodi de caeâ—â—â—o concedâ—tâ—â— breue de admensuratione dotis nec per sectâ—â— custodis si fictae per collusionem sequâ—tur vâ—â—sus mulâ—â—â—em tenentem in dotâ—m prâ—â—ludatâ—â— haeâ—â—â— cum ad aeâ—â—â—â—m pâ—â—uâ—neriâ—â—d 〈◊〉 admensuâ—â—â—dom c. If the plea be in the Coâ—â—tie the Plaintiffe may remoue it without cause and the Defendant may remoue it with â—â—â—â—e â—hewed in the writ as in a Repleuin And when the writ is râ—â—â—â—ed by Poâ—â— into the Common place the proâ—â—â—â—e iâ— summons attachment and distrâ—sse c. according to the Statute Then the Sheriffe cannot make admeasurement but he shall extend the land particularly and returning the Extent â—â—â—o the Common place the Iustices shall admeasure Dower Note if the Gardian assigne Dower excessiue and then grant ouer his estate his assigne shall neuer haue a writ of admeasurement Likewise if the heire vnder age assigne Dower which his Gardian may admeasure when he hath entred c. but the Action is not grantable for the Gardian assigned or grantee shall not admeasure But an heire may haue the admeasuring of Dower assigned in his Ancestors tune And if a woman be indowed in Chancery per le Roy c. the heire may haue a Writ of Admeasurement if a woman after shee is indâ—wed make any improuement of the â—and so that it becomes of farre gâ—eater value than it was of at the time of the Assignement there lieth no admeasuring vpon this improuement And Bracton saith Noâ— erit estimâ—nda melioraâ—â—o muâ—â—â—ris quaÌ„ fecit in dore suapost assignationem tempus eâ—im assignationis dotis erit spectandum But if this improuement bee by casualty iâ— some myne of câ—ale or lead which had béene formerly found and occupied in the husbands time the matter is somewhat doubtfull But sée Sir Edward Cokes 5. Rep. fol. 12. a. in Saunders cap. qÌ„ sc That if the myne appeared at the time of the ad assâ—gnemâ—nt admeasurement lieth As for new mynes a widdow may not make or dig any that is waste thus farre Fitzherbert Briton cap. 113. and Bracton lib. 4. cap. 17. shew with what circumstance admeasurement shal be made by the vicount surserement de probes homes praesentes per boâ—e legale extent They say that the amputation is not onely of excesse and superâ—â—uity by this Writ of admeasurement but also of that which â—ught not to bee assigned admensuratio debet esse â—am de indebito quam de superflâ—o And therefore if a Castell or head of a Barrony were assigned in Dower by the Gardâ—an without any necessity the heire may haue this Writ for enter hee cannot say they They shew also what plea a woman may haue against admeasurement viz. that the Plaintiffe himselfe made the assignation or confirmed or allowed it being of â—ull age c. SECT XXII The charge of Dower ADmitting the Dower assigned to be both for quality and quantity iust there is yet to
be declared with what immunity a woman shall hold her Dower First Bracton saith Si peculia maâ—iti sufficiant ad solutionem tenentur sed vxori dos sua deonerabitur Et heres defendere dotem warrantizare eam mulieri debet pro ea sequi comitatus hundreda curia dominorum vt viduatae domui suae intendat nutritioni suorum si qui fuerint puerorum If the husbands goods bee not sufficient for payment of his debts the heire must discharge Dower of the burden c. for he is the widdâ—wes warrant of her Dower and ought to follow for her County Court Court léet and hundred c. That shée may sée to her house and nurture of her children Fitzherbert in his Writ of Admeasurement first affirmes that a woman shall not be distreined in her Dower in her Inheritance or in the ioynt purchased lands to her or her husband for her husbands debts The Writ which he sets downe for remedy saith almost as much Râ—x Vicicounti c. cum secundum legem consuetudinem regni angliae mulieres in terris tenementis quae tenâ—nt in dotem de dono virorum vel quae sunt de ipsarum haereditate vel quae sibi quesiuerint pro debitis virorum distringi non debent c. And in some Writs is this Clause Dum tamen haeredes vel Executores testamenti ipsius c. ad debiâ—a illa reddenda nobis sufficiant But it séemes reasonable saith Fitzherbert that a woman shall not hee distreined in her Inheritance for the Kings debts neither in her Dower or Ioynt purchased lands which her husband if her title commenced before her husband became debtor and there is a Writ in the register importing no lesse yea hee affoordâ— it to be good reason that lands purchased by Baron and Feme after the Baron is entred in debt to the King should be discharged in the widdowes hands But let widdowes agrée with the King as well as they can the heire is lyable to the debts of his Ancestor before the widdow The heire likewise dischargeth her of suit and seruice and is so farre forth her warrant that by Britton if shee be impleaded and vouch any other to warranty she forfeiteth her Dower pur sa malice and though her husbands feofee be not called her warrant yet if she be indowed by him shee must hold of him And regularly Tenant in Dower must be Attendant to her husbands heire or to the heires Gardian or to the Gardenis Executor or to him in the reuercion according to the rate of rent whereby they hold ouer if Tenent by fealty and xij d. rent bée disseised and dye his wife being indowed by the disseisor shall be an attendant to the same dissessor of iiij d. annuall And now if the heire will bring a Writ of entry in to quibus against the woman thus indowed shee may shew her speciall matter and that shée is ready to attend to whom the Court will award which shall award that she retaine her Dower still and bee attendant to the heire quaere saith Parkins if the heire haue any other remedy for hee cannot enter vpon the Tenant in Dower D.st 82. a. saith That a Feme tenant in Dower leaueth the reuersion in him against whom shee demands her Dower although he be a disseisor and doth not reduce the reuersion by her recouery to him which hath right as other Tenants for life doe And as it is said in Sir Edward Cokes 8. Rep. 35. in Paynes ca. if she recouer against Tenant for life shee leaueth the reuersion in him But by nat br fol. 265. a. if the King assigne Dower in Chancery as Gardian the reuersion reposeth in the heire for which he shall sue liuery If after iudgement the heire grant his reuersion and the woman atturne she shall be Attendant to the grantée If Lord Meane Tenant be the Tenant holding by iij. d. rent and the Meane by 20. d. If the Tenant marry and the Meane release to him all his right in the tenancy the Tenant dieth the wife must bee endowed according to her husbands best possessions and therefore shall bee Attendant to the heire by a penny and not the third part of twenty pence If hee which holdeth by fealty and xij d. hauing a wife sell the tenancie to his Lord and the estate is executed the Tenants wife shall be indowed sans attendancie for the Seignory extinct is not reuiuable If Lord Measne and Tenant be the Tenant holdeth by xij d. which dieth his wife is endowed shee shall bee attendant to the heire by iiij d. now if the Lord release all his right in the tenancy to the heire the meanalty is extinct and the attendance gone for it was but in respect of the charge which the heire was at to his next Lord. But where there is Lord and Tenant by fealty and xij d. rent if the Tenant make a gift in tayle of the land to hold of him and his heires by xx s. rent c. if the donée dye without issue his wife endowed shall be attendant to the donor by v. s. and viij d. although the Lord release to the donor for his attendance is not in respect of the charge ouer but by a speciall reseruation If there be Seignor Meane and Tenant by fealty and iij. s. rent the Meanes wife after he be foreiudged in a Writ of meane and dead shall be endowed without attendance If Tenant by fealty and xij d. make a gift in taile of the land reâ—â—â—â—ing â—ij d. rent c. and the doâ—ce hauing a wife and issue by her â—iscontinueth in fee and dieth now though the wife recouer Dower and haue execution of it against the discontinues yet she shall not be attendant to him for hâ—s is not chargeable as the Baron was because the Dowers â—uowry resteth of â—ereâ—â—â—â—â— vpon the issue to whom for all that the widdow shall not bee attendâ—â—t till hee haue recontinued the 〈◊〉 resayle quaere tamen saith Perkins If the Tenant whilst hee Itâ—â—â— held of his Lord by fealty and a 〈◊〉 of forty shillings price the Tenants widdow when shée is endowed shall bee attendant by xiiâ— â— iiij â—c 〈◊〉 she tenure were by fealty and a nag without expresse value shée shall bée Attendant by a nag euery third yéere Perkins fo 84. â—â— SECT XXIII Of the cui in vita I Have béene long in Dower and I feare mee some women had rather neuer be endowed that is they had rather die with their husbands or soone after them than bée bound to learne this Catechisme yet I must come to it once againe But first let vssée how lands whereunto a woman may haue right by ancient indowment or by discent or gift in franckmarriage or by some other acquisition before or during Couerture in fee fée tayle for life or for yéeres may bee reduced if the husband haue aliened them for it the possession continued alwayes in the
vita If the assignment of this Dower be sans fait it is no barre or conÌ„clusiou but a Remitter otherwise if it be by Deed or Record If a man giue lands to a woman to marrie with him and after espousals he alieneth the same land and dieth she may haue a Cui in vita And note that the gift or demise alleaged in a Cui in vita is trauersable Thus much Fitzherbert 48. Ed. 3. 8. In a Cui in vita claiming to hold sibi 〈…〉 de corpore without shewing of whose donation the 〈◊〉 pleaded to the Writ and it was abated But in a Quod â—â— de 〈…〉 the Demandant needs not shew by whoâ—e gift she claimeth 49. Ed. 3. fol. â—9 The Writ was Qua 〈…〉 sib 〈…〉 W. N. The tenant said she neuer had any â—â—ing of the gift of W. N. per Belknap the answer was not good for were the gift from one or other if the husband aliened she might haue the action and the Writ may be Quâ—m elamaâ— vt ius haereâ—â—aâ—em though she purchased the lands adiorâ—atâ—r The latter point is affirmed 7. H. 4. fol 5 per Littleton accorded but for the first vide 50. Ed. â— fol. 6. in a Cui in viâ—a quam clâ—mat â—enerâ—â—x dimissione per termino viâ—ae â— N. it was admitted vpon argument a good answer per â— uâ—iam for where one maketh title it â—ught to be true And there finde sur release made to Baron and Fâ—me and to the herres of the baron by I. N. was holden no demise for it must be supposed the baron and feme were in possession tempore finis And Persy said it had béene adiudged if a woman claimed in her Writ ad termiâ—um vitae if it were found she had estate taile the Writ should abate So likewise if a woman claime by lease for terme of life per A. and it was sound that A. made no lease shée had now no estate and consequently hath none action Likewise said Kirton if in Assâ—ze of nouell disseism the plaintiffe make his title by fâ—offâ—â—nt of A. and is found that A. infâ—offed him not but B. did hée shall bee barred in the Assize for where a man maketh his title vpon a point which is boâ—nd against him it cannot be intenâ—â—â— that he hath a better title and there he shall not haue aduantage of any other 39. H. 6. fol. 38. In a Cui in vita quod clamat esse ius suâ—â—â— ex dâ—no I. which infeoffed tâ—â— Demandant and her fate husband with declaration that they were seised as of Franktenement and lâ—e les explees as teâ—ants for life c. Priâ—oâ— said That in cases speciall this Writ ought to make mention of whose gift lease or demise the Demandant claimeth as Ad â—erminum vitae ex dono I. S. or Sibi haeredibus ex dono I. S. But in demand of Fée â—â—â—nple it is enough to say Qâ—â—m â—lâ—mâ—t vt â—us haeâ—â—ditatem without shewing by whose gift or feâ—ffment 7. H. 7. fol. 2. If this Writ â—e againsâ—â—aron and feme for lands holden in the wiues right it must bee in quod vxor ingressa est per I. N. non quod vir vâ—or ingressi sunt per I. N. Sâ—CT XXIV west 2. Case 3. 2. Eâ— 4. foâ— 13. IF a man be seisod in right of his wife and recouerie is had against them by default the woman after his death may haue a Cui in vita but not a Quod ei deforceat per Moyle Iustice It séemes that at Common Law this writ of Cui in vita was onely granted vpon actuall discontinuance by the baron for West 2. casâ—â—â— iâ— Qâ—ando vir amiserit per defalcum tenementum quod â—uit in vxoris suae duruâ—â— fuit quod vxor post mortem viri non habuâ—rit aliud recupâ—rare quam per breue de recto propter quod Dâ—minus Rex â—â—atuit vt mulier post morâ—â—in â—iri haâ—eat râ—â—â—pâ—raâ—â— pâ—n breâ—ede ingressu cui â—â—â—a in vita c. But in this case if the tenâ—â—â— can proue that hee had right on his side when hee recouered Muâ—er â—iâ—il capit per â—reueâ— Nâ—tâ— also by the way that this heat wâ—â—s Si vir se absentaveriâ— â—â—luerit â—â—â— vxoris 〈◊〉 defendâ—re vâ—d si in vlta vxoris reddâ—â—◠〈◊〉 â—â— vâ—â—â— anâ—◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 paraâ—a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 deâ—â—â—dete 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to further for recoueries If Iudgement of â—or eiudger be giuen against Baron and Fâ—uie this is not void as soone as the Baâ—on is dead but vâ—ydable by error for the woman cannot haue a Cui in vita 〈◊〉 fol. 2â—â— A 〈◊〉 â—y 〈◊〉 â—◠〈◊〉 alienation â— and therefore vpon suâ—â— a â—â—coverie as soone â—â— the husband is dead the woman may haue a Câ—â—â—â—â—â—â— by the Common Law 4 Ed. 2. â—rook◠〈◊〉 vitâ— 18. If a râ—coâ—eriâ— be â—â—â— by 〈◊〉 Wâ—â—â— of waâ—â—e thâ— wâ—â—e cannot â—â—uâ—â—◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 either because the recouerie is not méerely by default or else because the 〈◊〉 of waste hath no demand of land quaere if shée shall haue a Quod eâ— deâ—oâ—ceat 9. Ed. 4. 16. If Baron and Feme be impleaded by one which hath good title and the Baron confesse the action the woman hath no remedie Yet the Statute is that vpon rendring by the Baron the wife may be receiued â—â— But if Baron and Feme be receiued vpon default of tenant for life where the reuersiâ—n is in the wife the Baron cannot confesse the action for hée must be 〈◊〉 Ad ius 〈◊〉 defâ—â—â—endum 7. Ed. 4. 17. SECT XXV The Sur â—ui in vita IF she which hath cause to bring a Cui in vita of Fée simple lands die before she hath sued c. her heire shall haue â— Sur â—â—â— in vita But if the wiues lands which the husband aliened were in state of Fee taile and the wife neâ—â—◠〈◊〉 her heire must sue a 〈◊〉 in disâ—onder and not a 〈◊〉 â—â—â—â—â—â— for though both these 〈◊〉 hée the children of the ancient Common Law and were before West 2. Yea and this latter Writ was maintainable for lands giuen to the mother in francke marriage or to the heires of her body which at the first was Féâ—â—â—â—pte yet when 〈◊〉 made 〈◊〉 â— taile it did also expressely set downe â— Writ whereby the heire should recouer such estates The Sur câ—â—â—n vita for it is no â—ore but Praecipe quod 〈◊〉 c. quod 〈◊〉 esse iâ—â— haeâ—â— ditateÌ„ suâ—â— in quod non habuit ingressum nisi per Eâ— and so in the Cui oâ— in the 〈◊〉 And the Aâ—â—t and Néeâ—◠〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in it vpon alienatioâ— made by the husband of their common Ancestor or vpon recouerie had against â—â—â— and her If a second husband alienhis wiues Fée siâ—ple landâ— and she dieth the issue by her first husband 〈◊〉 â—uâ—â— Sur cui in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 these â—â—nd husband still liuing if hée were neuer intituled to be Tâ—nant by the Curtâ—sie But
by default that now the Tenant shall not haue a Quod ei deforceat but Iudgement to recouer in value against the Vouchée If Baron and Feme tâ—nants for life in the wiues right lose by default and the Baron dye a Quod ei deforceat lieth not but a Cui in vita as vpon a Demise made by the baron In a Quod ei deforceat the Demandant must count that he was seised c. in his Demesne as of Francktenement or in his Demesne as of Fée tailâ— laying the Esplees in himselfe but he néeds not shew of whose gift lease or demise though he claime for life or she claimes in Dower or sibi haeredibus de corpore And the Defendant must deny the Demandants right c. and shew how he recouered in a Formedon or in some other Action concluding that he is ready to maintaine his right aâ—d title aforesaid c. vnde petit iudiciâ—m Then the Demandant must either trauerse it or shew matter in barre but he shall not make defence and then plead inbarre as he shall doe in a Formedon Fiâ—zh 10. Ed. 4. fol. 2. Dictum fâ—â—t and the tenant may plead a release of all the Demandants right in a Quod ei deforceat But the old Nat. Breu. obserueth that if the Demandant vouchâ—one that entreth into Warrantie hee which recouered shall not plead the Vouchées release made after recouerie In a Quod ei deforceat the Tenant may vouch and so may the Demandant 50. Ed. 3. 25. But if the Demandant vouch his Vouchée cannot vouch ouer 10. H. 7. 39. The old Nâ—t Bâ—eu acknowledgeth that in a Scire fâ—cias there lies no oucher yet if a man recouer by default in a â—câ—re facias out of a sine against Tenant in taile which bringeth a Qâ—od ei deâ—orceat if the Recouerer maintaine the title of his first Writ the Tenant in taile may vouch The Law séemes to be otherwise sée Plow 11â— 206. 14. H. 7. 18. The questions arose vpon the Demandants vouching 10. H. 7. fol. 10. The first whether he must shew cause of the Warrantie or no. The second whether hée may vouch one that hath nothing in the reuersion The third whether he shall recouer in value Frowicke answered The Voucher is by Statute and hee néeds not shew any cause for the Statute of W. 2. cap. 3. saith Concedatur ei quod vocet ad warrant ac si esset tenens in priori breue in which case he should shew no Déed Second hée shall not vouch any stranger for the Statute is Ideo concedatur eis quod vocenâ—ur ad warrantum quia non possunt sine his ad quos spectat reuersio respondere Third the Statute giuing voucher meanes that he shall haue the effect of his vouching id est to recouer in value And if a Statute giue action for a thing whereof the action did not lye at Common Law the partie shall haue iudgement processe and execution incident or belonging to that action and a reuersion is a cause of voucher and of recouerie in value Frowicke said fuâ—ther That though he which leased cannot disclaime yet his Grantee may and award his charge and if voucher here should be no more but an aid prayer the Grantée might not disclaime for if Tenant for life pray in aid of him in reuersion hée shall not disclaime And Tenant by the courtesie cannot vouch for he shall neuer recouer in value SECT XXVII Admonition for women to take heed of him in the reuersion THe rest of this fourth booke shall consist most in warnings to widdowes and women tenants in â—articular estates that they doe nothing preiudiciall to their warrant It is true for the most part Ex quibus rebus maxima vtilitas ex iiâ—dem summa pernicies Water washeth and drowneth fire reasteth and it burneth the Sunne ripeneth and it scortcheth and seareth They that can help can hurt The reuersioner of a widdowes estate of whom she shall haue aid to defend her shall take her estate from her in many cases if she offend him in his reuersion SECT XXVIII Of Waste EVen by the antique Law of England if Bracton say truth fol. 316. The Gardian in Chiualrie committing waste did lose the wardship was auerred Et damna restaurabat But if Tenant in Dower committed waste there was no forfeiture of her land or parcell of it but he in reuersion might stop and let her from doing waste and such hinderance was no Disseisen Also he might haue if néed required a Non permittas to the Sheriffe commanding him not to suffer waste vendiction or exile in lands tenements houses woods garden c. and he might haue attachment against the widdowes or a Pone per vadios saluos plegios to make her come c. shew why shée committed waste If the waste in a wood were found by Inquisition the paine was no more but that from thenceforth shée should take no manner of Estouers either to build burne or inclose but it must be per visum forestariorâ—m haeredis And Bracton sets forth the Wâ—â—â— for placing and appointing of the Fâ—râ—eâ—cor or by the heire ad praedict ' 〈…〉 custodiendum But now by the Stat. of Gloc. cap. 5. A writ of waste lyeth against Tenant in the courtesie or for life or for yeares or in Dower and the partie attainted in waste shall lose the thing wasted and make grée to trebble value of so much as the value shall be taxed at This Statute made 6. Ed. 1. ordaineth also that the Gardian which loseth his wardship for committing waste shall render dammages if losse of wardship be not equiualent to the harme Peraduenture Bracton wrote after the Statute for in one part of his Booke Ed. 1. is named â— 3. But it is said Sir Edw. Câ—kes 3. Rep. fol. 40. a. that Glanuile wrote temps H. a. Bracton temps H. 3. Britton temps Ed. 1. and in Sir Edw. Cokes 8. Rep. in Iohn Webs case fol. 46. b. he saith that Bracton wrote in fine del Roy H. 3. and Fleta wrote in temps E. 1. But note a woman shall not answer for waste done before her time yea if land bée leased to Baron and Feme for terme of their liues and they commit waste if the Baron die now the widdow is not punishable for this waste For that which the Baron did during couerture was only his act and offence dead and determined with his person Concessum per curiam 2. H. 4. and Br. 59. in his Writ of waste Yet if the lease had beene made to a Feme sole who takes a husband which commits waste otherwise it is by 9. H. 6. 52. women need no further warning to take héed of waste they are of themselues so hauing SECT XXIX The Writ of Entrie in casu prouiso BVtlet eâ—â—â—rie good woman take héed how she maketh any gift or alienation of such lands as she holdeth in Dower For Glocest cap. 3. is if a woman sell or
giue away in fée or for life the tenement which shée holdeth in Dower the heire or he which is in reuersion may maintenant haue his recouerie by Writ of Entrie and this is termed a writ of Entrie in Casu prouiso There is no doubt but Fée in this Statute signifieth both Fée simple and Fée taile And he which hath Fée simple Fée taile or Estate for life in the reuersion may haue this Writ against the Alienée or against him which is tenant of the Francktenement And this during the life of the tenant in Dower which aliened for when she is dead it lieth not perâ—el Nâ—t Breu. The Statute expresseth not the writ but the forme is Praecipe A. quod reddat B. vnum tonemen um quod clamat in quod non habet ingressum nisi per C. quae suit vxo D. qui illud ei demisâ—â— illud tenuit in dotem de dono praedicti D. quondum viri sunt cuius haeres c. quod post eemisionem per istud C. praefat ' A. contra formam Statuti Glocest c. ad praefatum â— reuerti debet performameiusdem Statuti And it may be in the Per Cui or Post If a woman recouer Dower against the heire and then alien in Fée the recouerie must be mentioned by the heire in his writ of Entrie in Casu prouiso In like manner as it must be in a writ of Entrieâ—d Communem Legem vpon an alienation by tenant in Dower and though this alienation be but in taile or for life yet the forme of the writ varieth not If he which hath the reuersion in Fée grant it to another and the Tenant in Dower after Atturnment alieneth in Fee the Grantée of the reuersion shall haue Writ specifying the grant Likewise if the heire grant his reuersion with Atturnment and the Grantée grants it ouer with Atturnment the third Grantée may haue a writ specifying that the woman held of the first second and third ex assignatione c. The Aunt and Néece hauing the reuersion by discent may ioyne in this writ and the processe is summons grand and petit cape SECT XXX The Writ if Enirie in Casa coasimili THis Writ is in nature like the other and it lyeth when Tenant by the courtesie or Tenant for his owne life or another mans alieneth in fée or in taile or for terme of life he in the reuersion which hath it for life or in taile or in fée may haue this Writ of Entrie in Casu consimili during the life of him which aliened and this is formed and granted vpon West 2. cap. 24. which willeth That as often as there is a Writ found in Chancerie for one case and another case falling sub eodemâ—â—â—e and requiring like remedy there is none in the registrie of the Chancerie for that the Clerks of the Chancerie shall concord in framing a writ Vel atterminent quaerâ—ntes in proximo Parliamento scribantur vsus in quibus concordare non possunt c. referant eos ad proximum Parliamentum fiat breue de consensu Iurisperitorâ—m ne contingâ—tdâ— caetero quod curia Domini Regis deficiat conquerentibus in Iustitia perquirenda The Writ is Reuerti debet performam statuti in consimili casu prouisi And it supposeth alwayes altenation in feodo although the Tenant leased or dem sed it but for terme of another mans life or in taile And so the writ of in Casu prouiso And that of Entrie ad Communem Legem This writ may be in the per cui and post And without title made in the writ if if so be that the Demandant himselfe made the particular estate of him which aliened But if the father or other Ancestor make a lease for terme of life and die and then the Tenant for life alieneth in fée now the heire in reuersion shall haue a writ comprising his title in it selfe And if this writ be brought vpon alienation made by Baron and Feme the writ supposeth that the wife aliened with her husband but yet shée may haue a Cui in vita after her husbands death the alienation not letting it If Tenant for life grant his estate to another and the grantee alieneth in fée the Writ shall be in quod non habet ingressum nisi per C. cuâ— D. qui illud tenuit ad vitam ex demissione B. deâ—â—sit ad eusdem teâ—mâ—num c. If a man make a lease for life and dye and his heire grant the reuersion to B. and the Tenant attâ—â—nes If now the lessée grant his estate to another which alieneth in fee to A. B. shall haue a Writ comprehending the assignation and grant of all the estates If lands bee giuen to two men and to the heires of one of them and he which hath the fée simple dies and then the Tenant for life alieneth in fée now the heire of him in remainder may haue this Writ for it lyeth as well for him as for Tenant in reuersion If any Abbot or Prior make a lease for life the lessée alien the Prior dye c the successor may haue this Writ Also tenant in taile may haue it if hee make a lease for life and his lessee alien in fée And it séemes if Tenant in taile make a lease for life of the lessee and dye the issue in taile may choose to bring a Formdon or Writ of Entrie in Consimili casu against the alienée whilst the lessée for life is yet liuing for the alienée which is Tenant in the Action cannot plead in Abatement of the Writ that the Demandant hath title to a Formedone But if Tenant in taile make a lease for terme of his owne life which is no discontinuance if now the lessee alien in fee and the lessor dye his heire cannot haue a Writ de consimili casu but he is driuen to his Formedone for in this case he hath no title to other Actions by colour of any demise But in the former case he had title by reason of the discontinuance made for life to claime by right of the new reuersion discended so that hee had a double title the reuersion reserued sur le seas and the title in taile consequently election of Action Quaere P. 17. Ed. 3. A lease made for life the remainder to another in fée the lesses aliened in fée and a writ de consimili casu brought by him in the remainder and it abated for the Court said that hee in remainder was not possessed in fait till the remainder did fall after the death of the â—essée Saith Fiâ—zherbert the Law is not so taken at this day but that hee in remainder hath the remainder vested in him as well as hath hee in the reuersion for hee may haue an action of waste and enter for alienation of his tenement as well as hee in the reuersion may Ergo hee hath his remainder in faâ—t and mee séemeth this Iudgement was not well giuen saith Fitzherbert And
Hill 18 E. 2. it was held by Herle Iustice that the Writ lieth well enough for him in remainder And Tri. 31. E 1. the heire in taile maintained a writ of entry in Consimili casu vpon alienation made by tenant le curtesie SECT XXXI The Writ of Entrie ad communem legem THe Writ of Entry at Common law is giuen in Case where Tenant in Dower or per curtesie or for life doth alien in fée or in taile or for life c. now if the Tenant which aliened doe dye hec in the reuersion must take this Writ of Entry ad communem legem which is very like the former Writs and may be in the per cui post If a woman recouer Dower alien and dye the Writ of Entry ad communem legem must make mention of the recouery And if Tenant by the curtesie aliâ—â— in fée and dye he in the reuersion if he be heire in fée simple may sue this Writ or his Assise of Moâ—â— dancester giuen by the Statute of Glocester ca. 3. If Tenant for life alien in fée and dye the Writs for him in reuersion are in diuers formes for if hee haue the reuersion by discent the Writ is in quod idem A. non habet ingressum nisi per C. câ—i D. pator vel antecessor of the Demandant cuius haeres c. demised c. But when the Demandant himselfe made the lease to him which aliened then the Writ is or may be Pâ—aecipe quod recidat c. omitting these words quod clomat vt ius haereditatem and note if Tenant for life alien in fee and dye hee in reuersion may chuse whether he will haue this writ or an ad terminum qui praeteriit If Tenant for life grant his estate and hee in reuersion grant his reuersion with Atturnement if now the Tenant which atturned alien in fée the grantée of the reuersion shall haue a Writ mentioning the grant and assignation c. SECT XXXII More of forfeitures and how a particular Tenant may forfeit his estate without alienation NOte If Tenant for life lease the land to I. S. for terme of life of I. S. which dyeth the first leasâ—e still liuing hee shall not haue the land againe because hee leased more than was in him and therefore hee in the reuersion shall haue it But if two be seised for life the inheritance in fée to one of them and ioyne in a lease for life and the leasee dyeth they shall bee ioynt tenants againe ê‘ Littleton 13. E. 4. fol. 4. Because hée which had the fée was priuy to the lease and so the other gained no new reuersion It is yet further to be vnderstood both that he in reuersion may enter vpon alienations made by particular Tenants vt supia to his disinheritance without suing the aboue mentioned Writs And also that there are sundry other forfeitures to the Reuersioner besides expresse alienations which I would haue widdowes to take héed of 6. Edw. 3. fol. 17. In Action of waste by an Infant against Tenant by his fathers demise he pleades that the father confirmed his estate to haue and to hold to him and his heires in fee by his déed shewed to the Court Iudgement si c. It was said for verity that if the claime were found false the heire might enter Page 64. in Fitzh And if a reuersion bee granted by fine and the conuse brings a quid iuris clamat against the Tenant for life which pleadeth that shee hath estate in taile by deuise in Testament from the Commissors if it bee found by verdict that shee hath but estate for life that estate is forfeited Quod vide Plowd fol. 212. in Saunders in Fremans Case where the entry for the conusée is consideratum est pro seisina reddâ—t praed cum partium versus c. occasionae clam ' placit praedict ' forisfact ' habend ' si voluerit persequatur ac etiam quod finis praed si voluerit ingrossetur Plesingtons Case 6. R. 2. was this A man made a lease for yéeres and granted further by Indenture if he aliened the reuersion or dyed within the teâ—me that the leassée should haue francketenement and liuery was made the fée simple was granted by fine c. and in a quid iuris clamat the leassee claimed francketâ—nement iudgement was giuen that the cognisée might enter for a forfeiture and that the fine should be engrossed si voluerit Sée 3. 4. Eliz. Dier 209. in a like case the iudgement was not quod quaerens recuperet seisinam but quod prosequatur pro seisina si voluerit finis ingrossetur c. SECT XXXIII The Statute of 11. H. 7. cap 20. THe Common Law restrictiue of it selfe and helped something by the Statute of Glocester was sufficient a great while to bridle women from making alienations for any land that they held in Dower or Ioynture as arguments of their owne good deserts and testimonies of their husbands loue But time which made the art of fencing more fine than it was at the first when Combattants fought all at head and shoulders and it was greater shame to strike vnder the girdle than it is now made law also more subtile than in the beginning it was when lands went altogether or for the most part by liuery of seisin And women witty of themselues instructed by crafty men grew cunning at the last that they could alien lands holden for life or in taile to whom they listed in fée And hee which suffereth disinheritance should not easily helpe himselfe by Writ of Entry either ad communem legem or in casu prouiso for remedy whereof was made this seuere statute in effect as followeth 11. H. 7. If any woman which hath had or hereafter shall haue any estate in Dower or for life or in taile ioyntly with her husband or only to her selfe or to her vse in any Manors Lands Tenements or other Hereditaments of the inheritance or purchase of her husband or giuen to the husband and wife in taile or for terme of life by any Ancestors of the husband or by any other person seised to the vse of the husband or of his Ancestors and haue or shall hereafter being sole or with any other after taken to husband discontinued or discontinue aliened released or confirmed alien release or confirme with warranty or by couin suffered or suffer any recouery of the same against them or any of them or any other seised to their vse or to the vse of either of them after the forme aforesaid that all such recoueries discontinuances alienations releases confirmations and warranties so had and made and from henceforth to be had and made be vtterly void c. And that it shall be lawfull to euery person and persons to whom the interest title or inheritance after the decease of the said woman of the said manors lands or tenements or other hereditaments being discontinued aliened or suffored
the Statute of 〈◊〉 7. notwithstanding the foure hundred pounds paid by â—â—â— husbands father for the â—â—nd â—rst moued from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 father and the presermenâ— of the bloâ—â—â—â— I. N. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 intent that the husbands heires should not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but the wiues And the Bishop of Exâ—â—tors case 〈◊〉 that case cited which was that in consideraâ—ion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to the woman and seruice done by the man 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 gaue the land to them 〈◊〉 â—â—◠〈◊〉 to 〈◊〉 of the Bishop it was â—â—â—â— to be 〈◊〉 that the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 after her husbandâ—â—â—â—th had no 〈◊〉 within 〈◊〉 said Statute of â—â— H. 7. but that she might self it 〈◊〉 â—â—nger of the Statutâ— SECT XXXV What Actions concerning chattells doe suruiâ—e a widdow I Hâ—ld it good wisdome for a widdow and for all persons to haue greatest care of matters of greatest moment and not to contemne the lesser Now that â—â—â— haue doâ—e with matters of Francktenement we will see a little in what Actions concerning Chattels reaâ—â— or personall duties a widdow may be Plaintiffe or Defendant to make an end of reckonings begin before or whilst she was a wife Iâ— Feme couert deliuer Déed to I. S. she may haue Action of Detinue for the Déed after her husbands decease for though the deliuerie were voyd betwixt I. S. and the Baron yet it is good betwixt I. S. and the wife if the Baron dye 3. H. 6. 50. If a lease be made to Baron and Feme for yeares and the Baron die the wife shall haue the terme and if the Lessor out her she may haue Action of câ—uenant 47. Ed. 3. 12. If a man be bound to Baron and Feme in Statute Merchant the Baron alone may make de 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 e and by some opinion the Auâ—â—â—â— quert la must bée against â—â—â— alone but if he doe not release c. the Statute suruâ—â—â—th to thâ— wife and she may sue execution executor â—â— my And per Finch the Law is all one of an Obligation and a Statute Likewise in a plea of land if Baron and Feme recouer the land with dammages and the Baron â—â—â— his wife shall sâ—e for dammages and not his Executors So likewise by Bâ—lknap If an Obligation be made to Alice the wife of Robert this is a good Obligation and Alice and Robert may ioyne in an action vpon it and if Robert die before he haue released for â—e may 〈◊〉 release it Alice alone shall haue the Action 48. Ed. â— 12. simile 7. H. 6. fo 2. Sée the Commentaries of Sir Coke vpon Littleton fol. 350. It is said that Chattels reals of a mixt nature namely part y in possession and partly in action happening during couerture if the wife haue her husband she shall haue them by the Common Law as if the husband be seised of a rent charge rent seruice or Secke iure vxoris the rent incurreth during couerture if the husband dye the wife shall haue the arrerages and â—â— of an Aduowson of the Church during couerture sic de 〈◊〉 And in those cases the husbands shall gainâ— them by suruiuership but for arrerages or auoydance of the Church before marriage the husband could haue â—â— help by suruiuership and so of releases But now by the Statâ—te of 32. H. 8. cap. 37. By suruiuership the husband shall haue the arrerages as well incurred before the marriage as after If an Estray happen within the Mannor of the wife if the husband dye before seisure the wife shall haue it fâ—r that the propertie was not in the wife before seisure But as to personall goods there is a diuersitie 〈◊〉 a propertie and a bare possession for if personall goods be deliuered to a woman or if she finde goods or if goods come to her hands as Executrix to a Baylâ—ffe and taketh aâ— husband this bare possession is not giuen to the husband but the Action of Dâ—tâ—â—ue must be brought against the husband and the wife If Baron and Feme make a lease for yeares and the Baron die the wife may bring an Action of waste 22. H. 6. 24. If an Obligation be made to Baron and Feme and the Baron die the widdow may haue the Obligation 4. H. 6. 5. Quaere for the booke is not so cleare as Brooke makes it the woman was Obligée with her husband 〈◊〉 sued as Executrix Generally where title or cause of Action is giuen 〈◊〉 woman before marriage or during marriage and the husband releaseth not c. the Action suruiueth when â—â—â— dye But there may be a release in land as well as in fact iâ—plied as well as expressed And therefore the case is 8 Ed. â— Br. Dâ—â—â— 156. and cite Plowâ— 184. in Woodward and Darcy his Case If a man be bound to a woman and to another and the Obligor marry the woman all the obligation is extinct although the wife ouer liue her husband or although shee dyes â—wing the other obligee for either of the obligées hath power to release and that inter marriage is a release And gifts in Law of the chattels of the wife as well reall as personall are outlawry or attainder of the husband If a man marry with a woman executrix and then release to Creditors all manner of Actions generaly this extendeth to his proper accords and to those which his wife hath either in her owne right or as executrix Baron and feâ—e â—0 in Brooke Sée Brooke coueâ—onâ— 6. Action of couenant was brought against Baron and Feme lessées of a Manor for terme of life rendring 20. â—i per annum and they were bound to the Plaintiffe that hée should haue such surety for his rent as his Councell deuised the Counsellers deuised the Assurance and the Defendants refused to make it it was ruled for Law that if the Baron died nothing should bind his widdow saue onely the lease and reseruation if shee agréed to the lease post mortem viri And shée shall bee charged with payment of the rent or double it or pay fine â—◠〈◊〉 paenae or hold it subieâ—t to reentry according as the lease was made But a collaterall couenant as that the lessor shall distraine in other lands for his rent or a couenant to charge the lessées persons in twenty pound for non payment c such like agréements binde not the widdow when the Baron is dead and the Writ abilted Note that widdow is a good Addition to bee put to the Defendants name many originall Writ of Action personall appeale or inditement wherein exigent â—eth c. According to the Statute â— Hen. 5. cap. 5. And 14. Edw. 4. fol. â— Bâ—arkey demanded of the Iustices in the 〈◊〉 chamber if an Action were brought against a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was neither maid wife nor widdow what addition should be giuen her some say she should be called single woman and there it is doubted whether seruant â—ee a good addition or not for it was no addition by the Common Law as some said Wée are past the
greatest and most difficult part of Law peculiarly belonging to a widdow and come now to consider whether she shall marrie againe or no. If Iohn Boccace de Câ—rtaldo in his Booke De duris mulieribus may be beleeued When the sister of couetous King Pigma â—â—â— and widdow of Sycheus Hercules his Priest had built the Wals Temple Market Towne house and priuate dwellings of Carthage giuing lawes and rules of life to the inhabitants amongst the rest that were filled with loue of her great vertues and singular beautie the King of Malaca was one he grew so vehement in his desires that he threatned the Citizens of Carthage with warres and vtter subuersion of their new Citie vnlesse he might haue the Foundresse of it to be his wife They knowing how highly their Quéen would remaine displeased by any direâ—â— sollicitation to a second marriage not knowing how otherwise to saue themselues determined to win her assent without asking The chiefe of them went therefore to Dido and told her how the King of Malaca required Masters and Instructers of humaâ—â—tis to be sent him out of Carthage from whom he and his people might learne to doe off their naturall â—â—â—â—atousnesse and inciuilitie and further how hée had menaced fire sword and extreme dissolution vnlesse his request were accomplished But they knew not they said whom to send or who would be willing to goe and leaue his owne habitation to dwell with a King of such sauage nature and wilde behauiour as was this King of Malaca Dido when she heard them answered that she was ashamed there should be found in any Carthaginian such 〈◊〉 and cowardly feare affirming plainly that men were not borne onely for themselues and whosoeuer he were that would not aduenture losse perill yea and death though it were certaine for safegard of his Countrey hée was she said vnworthy to dwell in Carthage or that either he or his posteritie should euer be receiued to any honour or reputation amongst them The Carthaginians thought they had obtained their desire and vncouered their counsell to the Quéene telling her plainly the Kings demand Dido not knowing how to reply against her owne râ—darâ—utions replenished with sorrow and aâ—xietiâ— was enforced to yeeld her assent to wedlocke and craued a day before which she said she would goe vnto her husband but before thâ— terme was expired she caused a great fire to be made in the most eminent place of the Citie and there in view and concourse of all other people after many ceremonies and offering of sacrifice as it were to appease the ghost of â—câ—â—us she suddenly with a knife strake her selfe tâ— the heart and told her subiects that now she went to her husband her Sicheus her deare Sichâ—us on whose name still inuocating she sunke to the ground haning chosen rather to shed her dearest lifes bloud as she said than to violate the vowes of chaste widdowhood Boccace mine Author here may haue some colour of reason to extoll the resolution of Dido but not to condemne so bitterly as he doth all women that marrie a second husband Some of them are destitute of friends their parents brethren and kindred dwell farre off sutors câ—me euerie day who can obsist them Another widdow hath lands rents store of goods some suits at Law and no body that she can trust in help to gouerne that which shee hath or to inherit it when she is gone Another is tolled to marrie by mightie perswasions of her dearest friends and kindred Another hath 〈◊〉 youth on her side 〈◊〉 Indians leape into the dead mans fire if they will she hath learned that it is better to marrie than to burne SECT XXXVI A 〈◊〉 to marriâ— so 〈◊〉 it be not vncertaine who shall 〈◊〉 her to theâ—â—â—◠〈◊〉 I For my part that am like neuâ—r to be feared vnlesse some widdow be moued with compassion towards mée will not speake villanie of Bigamie or Octogamie let euerie woman marrie when she seeth her time but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a slow speed perhaps will be best and let her examine well whether the pannier be emptie or no. If saith Sir Thomâ—s Smith in his Treatise De Repub. Angliae â—ol 104. I marrie the widdow of one lately dead which at the time of her husbands death was with childe and the childe is bâ—â—ne after marriage solomnized with me this childe shall be mine 〈◊〉 and lawfull sonne so precisely doe we take the letter Peterest quem 〈◊〉 demonstranâ— Littleton â—aith 18. E. 4. fol. 30. If a man marrie a woman which is groâ—â—ment ensâ—â—nt by another and within foure dayes after marriage she is deliuered this childe shall be his that hath newly married the woman and inherit his land for it is no bastard It 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 would haue it vnderstood of a woman enseint by â—â—p â—â—zard and in such cases it is reason that hee which takes the Dame should haue the Fole So â—s it also when â—â—â—man elopes with a stranger in 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 her husband Iohn at Noke being betwéene 〈◊〉 foure 〈◊〉 must father the â—hilde and it shall be his heire it he die for the Law will not â—â—ing into triall directly wh◠〈◊〉 the childe 44 Edw. 3. fol. 10. and â— Hâ—â— 4. 〈◊〉 â—â—â— though issue may 〈◊〉 â—â— taken whether a woman 〈◊〉 ensâ—mâ— by her 〈◊〉 â—â—â—hâ— time of his deathâ— deaâ—ing out the question by whom as appeareth by the forâ—â—â— Bookes and 1. H. 6. fol. 3. Then if it may be found by Enguâ—st that a woman was with childe at her husbands death the Law which permits not to enquire by whom affirmes it to be the husbands and that husbands which might lawfully begâ—t it I thinke â—urely â—ir Thomas Smith mistooke the Law for by Thorpe and Willowby 24. E. 2. fol. â—9 If a man dye seised of land in Fee simple and the wife which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with a soâ—ne marrie againe and after is deliuered â—â—is sonne shall bée adiâ—dged sonne and herro to the first Barâ—n and not to the second Though Iustice Beâ— there were of opinion that the Infant might â—huâ—e his father It were better reason perhaps that the second husband might 〈◊〉 whether hée should be his soâ—ne or no and by allowance make him hiâ— heire Sir Ed. Coke in his Comment vpon Littleton fol. 8. a. saith Iâ— a man hath a wife and dieth within a â—erie short time after the wife marrieth againe and within nine monethâ— hath a childe so as it may be the childe of the one or the other some haue said in this case the childe may chuse his father Quia in hoâ— casâ— filiatio non potest probari and so is the Booke to be intended For auoyding of which question and other inconcemences this was the Law before the Conquest Sit omnis vidua â—ine marito 12. mensibus si marita verit perdat dorem But if women had all béene of such sobrietie as many are many of these questions had neuer risen and I must confesse
second branch of the Statute shall bee expounded father or mother after the death of the father And it was resolued in that Case that there bee two manners of custodies or wardships the one by the Common Law the other by the Statute And that also at the Common Law there are foure manners of Gardians namely Gardian in Chiualry Gardian in Soâ—age Gardian in nature and Gardina for nurture and now the Statute makes a new Gardian namely by assignation but the mother in that case cannot be Gardian for nurture because her daughter was past 14. yéeres of age But she had the custody of her within the prouisâ—on of the Act â—ure naturae and the assent of Raph Ratcliffe the mothers husband was not materiall for the custody of a child is an inseparable incident to the parent and marriage may not transferre that to a husband And that was resolued that although the issue was whether Elizabeth had the custody of Martha at the time of the contract and that did appeare that shee departed from her mothers house six houres before the contract yet in iudgement of Law her mother had the custody of her at the time of the contract And that was resolued that in that Case Edward Ratcliffe and Martha his wife had good title to the land against Andrewes and his wife for the one daughter as that Case is shall not take benefit of forfeiture of the other for the statute giues the forfeiture to the next of kin to whom the inheritance should descend or come after her decease during the life of such person that so shall contract matrimony so that first hee ought to be of the bloud and secondly to whom the inheritance should descend or come c. and although the wife of Andrewes bee of the bloud yet in that Case by the death of Martha the land if shee hath issue shall deseend to her issue and if shee hath not issue that shall reuert to her mother c. but iudgement was against the Plaintiffe for that the issue was found against him These are the Lawes whereby rapes and rauishments of women are repressed which if they bee well looked vnto will proue that there is now no cause why lying Lâ—onicus Chalcondilus should be beleeued who writing of Englishmen affirmeth that we haue no care what becomes of our wiues and children That in our peregrinations and trauels wee interchange and vse one the others wiues mutually That we count it no reproch by whom soeuer our wiues or daughters bee got with â—hild That with vs if a man come to his friends house hee must lye with his wife the first thing that he doth vt deinde benigue hospitio accipâ—arur And though some of the last recited Lawes were vnmade when Chalcondilus did write aboue one hundred yéeres since yet there were then Lawes enough to proue him a déepe lyer and had hée â—éene in England to haue trussed him vp too perhaps for lechery had his learning steaded him no better than his honesty this is no lesse cause why I should be thus bitter against Chalcondilus a dead man for that it may séeme he wrote by hearesay nullo odio gentis and in other matters hee reporteth honourably of vs. But it is strange that a man writing not a great while since but euen the other day not at Athens neither at Rome or Reams where they vse to belie vs head and foot but here at London should be bold to wrâ—te and put in print matter to this effect That beggers and the poorest sort of our women we doe vse to punish and to whip them when they are taken for leachers and dishonest liuers But Gentlewomen and Ladies of honour and worship they are neuer pâ—nished for incontinency but rather for their amorous wantonnesse and lubricity the more estéemed and magnified This follow deserueth plainly better to bee hanged than to bee beléeued For neither is it true that any womâ—n with vs can better her reputation by dissolute life and manners Neither can any woman learne a more deuillish lesson than so to be perswaded And seeing the Lawrs themselues declare what detestation they haue of bruitish concupiscence by punishing consent with lâ—sse of inherâ—tance I would I could perswad all women to eschew not only these gulfes but also the ecclesiasticall Censures which I meddle not with together with the â—â—â—â—my which they purchase sometime with outward laâ—â—â—â—iousnesse from the report of them which iudge a careâ—â—ssâ— liberty in behauiour an infallible argument of sensuality whereby some men haue béene imboldened to offer â—orâ—â— because they thought it was expected SECT XXIX Appealâ— of rape NOw let vs consider a little how these Lawes 〈◊〉 to bee put in practice if any virgin widdow or â—â—gle woman be rauished shee her selfe may sue an Appeale of rape prosecute the feâ—on to death and the Kingâ—â—â—â—don as it séemeth cannot helpe him If a Feme coâ—â—â—â— be rauished shee cannot haue an Appeale without her husband as appeares 8 Hen. 4. fol. 21. But if a Feme â—ouert be rauished and confent to the rauisher the husband alone may haue an Appeale and this by the Statute 6. Rich. 2. cap. 6. The husband that this Statute speaketh of which may sue the Appeale must be a lawfull husband in right and possession for ne vnques accouple in loyall matrimony is a good plea against â—im 11. Hen. 4. fol. 13. So doth Iustice Stanford affirme the booke to proue without question and that the Law is so too where Appeale is brought by Baron and Feme Brooke abridging the case 11. Hen. 4. séemeth to incline to the contrary opinion The case at length is thus Thomas Hausegle sâ—â—th Appeale de rauishment sa feme against Thomas V. and others according to the Statute 6. Rich. 2. reheaâ—â—â—â—â— in his Declaration the order of the Statute and that they had rauished her against the forme of the said 〈◊〉 The Appellâ—â—â— said the Plaintiffe had another Writ hanging returnable the same tearme of the same rape and because the Writ was not serued he had obtained a sicut alias Ergo this Writ of the same nature should abate Haâ—â—said he might pursue which Writ â—e would And by their writ a Praecipe quod reddat or an Assise for the like cause shall abate for of one land a man cannot haue two recoueries But in this case it may bee there were two rapes at seuerall times c. and also the first Writ was not entred in the roll nor the â—â—cut alias in the Record then the Declaration was challenged as insufficient because it was â—elonice rapuit and not carnaliter cognouit but to that it was answered that felonious rape implied carnall knowledge for rape without such knowledge is buttrespasse Another exception to the Declaration was that two had rauished as principall c. which Rolfe said could not be therefore the Plaintiffe ought to haue declared against one as principall and against the other as accessary or
Writ because it was not felonice rapuit but the Defendant durst not stand vpon it but pleaded ouer rien culpable for rapuâ—t implyâ—th felony But in euerie Appeale of rape if the Writ want the word rapuit it shall abate though it haue words amounting to as much as carâ—â—â—â—ter cognovit or any such â—tâ—â—e 9. E. 4. â—ol 26. SECT XXXIV Pleas to the Action THough it bee true that where â—â—â— shall bee charged with rape in Appeals or otherwise it â—ust be by the Word rapâ—it and â—â—t carnaliter cognouit onely yâ—t by Bracton it is a gâ—â—d plea in Appâ—ale of rape to say Non abstullt eâ—â—ucellagiumâ— suum quâ—a aâ—â—uâ—h vâ—â—go est veâ—iâ—â—â— probabâ—â—uâ— pâ—â— aspâ—câ—â—â—â—oâ—poâ—iâ— peâ— quatuoâ— legales femâ—nas iuratâ—s de veâ—itate dicenda quaere Stamford saith it is a good plea for the Defendant though hâ—e lay with the woman yet hée did not carnally know her for the force of the Declaration resteth in that And by â—â—iâ—ton fol. 45. If at the time of rape supposed the womâ—n conceiue childe there is no rape for none can concâ—â—â—e without consent Also by Bracton it is a good plea to say that before the rape supposed he kept the Plaintiffe and vsed her as his Concubine But by the same Bracton it was no plea to say she was another mans Concubine or Harlot Quia licet meretâ—â—x fuerit aâ—ea cerâ—â—â—â—â—c â—emporis non fuit cuâ— nequiâ—iae eius reclamando consentiâ—e noluit And note if she which is rauished assenâ— for feare of death at the time of the rauisâ—â—ent â—t â—s a rape against her will notwithstanding such consent for assent must â—e voluntarie per curiam 5 E. 4. Crompton 44. SECT XXXV A question what is meant by rauishment with force in Wâ—st 2. cap. 34. STamford leaueth it doubtfull and to be learned what the difference is betwixt rauishment with force and without force M. Lambard thinketh the word to be but declaratorie signifying all rauishment to bée forcible And it is true that no woman is rauished in this sort only by parroll or influence of Rhetoricke But in mine opinion the Statute must néeds intend two kinde of rauishments because it maketh one more odious than the other and propoundeth death ineuitable to him which rauisheth with force though the woman forgiue hâ—â— and consâ—â—â— to him A more detestable villany I thinke therefore was meant in this parase of him which being himselfe ouercome with concupisâ—â—nce ouercommeth a woman hand to hand by length of breath and strength of his owne sinewes You shall vnderstand thâ—refore that about those dayes there was an Appeale of â—orâ—e in vse as it were against the rauishers yeomen of the stirrâ—p viâ— against him or them which were holders and assisters to the principall carnall oppressour as appeareth about the end of the 28. Chapter of Bracton Lib. 3. Eadem A. appellat C. quod eadem die eodem anno c. quo praedict B. eadem hora dum idem B. abstulit pucellagium suum fuit idem C. in fortia ita quod tenuit eandem A. dum idem B. absâ—ulit pucellagium suum vel concubuit cum ea postquam c. Such fellowes were termed appellati de fortia and they which take such Coadiutors might verie well be called rauishers with force and aid of all other most hatefull in iudgement of all indifferent honest women SECT XXXVI De muliere abducta cum bonis c. THis Statute toucheth also the most couetous rauishment that is when a mans wife and his goods are rauished together so much against womans minde that she is loth to leaue either money or plate behinde her and because some men vsed in those dayes to let their goods goe lest otherwise they might perhaps call their wiues home againe the suit is giuen to the King if the husband neglect it 44. Assi p. 12. A man brought a Writ of trespasse against a Knight and his Lady and two others in Banke le Roy for taking away the Plaintiâ—â—es wife and his goods and they all came by Capias in custodie of the Viscount and the Plaintiffe counted of rauishment of his wife and his goods carried away c. a protection was shewed forth for the Knight and his wife and allowed and Iudgement was demanded of the Writ because the Plaintiffe and his wife were diuorced Iustice Kniuct said that though the woman were dead the husband might haue the Action of rauishment notwithstanding aâ—d so is it if they were diuorced For he was not to recouer his wife by the Action nor any thing else saue dammages for the trespasse Then it was said the diâ—orce was causa frigiditatis Kniuet said the weather might wax warmer with him Il poet recouerer son nature ouerer come home reauer sa feme and therefore answered to the Writ Then Iudgement was asked againe of the Writ because it was against a man and his wife and one woman cannot rauish another sed non allocatur for a woman may be assenting or aiding to any rauishment therefore the Defendants pleaded non culpable The verie same or verie like case is againe 23. E. 3. 23. Sée 21. H. 7. fol. 13. The opinion of Finâ—ux that it is lawfull for a man to trauell with another mans wife to London at her request and to carrie her behinde him when shee will ride to sue a diuorce or a reuersment of Outlawrie or for a warrant of the peace against her goodman Yaxley was of contrarie opinion And where the partie which taketh another mans wife cum bonis c. is indited at the Kings suit of trespasse onely the Indictment is Quod vi armis Mariam vxorem cuiusdam A. B. apud S. rapuit â—am cum bonis cattallis viz. c. ipsius A. B. cepit abduxit â—a â—idem A. B. adhuc iniuste detinet contra pâ—cem c. contra formam statuti c. So likewise at the husbands â—â—it the Writ is Attachias B. quod sit coram nobis c. ad respondendum prefato A. quare vi armis vxorem prefati A. apud N. rapuit â—am cum bonis cattallis c. ad graue dâ—mnum contra formam statuti c. as appeares by Fitzherbert So that you see the differâ—nce betwixt rapuit in Trespasse and in Appeale or Indictment of felony Presidents whereof are in M. Laâ—â—bards Booke and M. Cromptonâ— SECT XXXVII The case of Elizabeth Venor NOw that women may learne to stand vpon their owne guard partly and not trust altogether to defence or courtesie of Lawes which are not more rigorously penned than sometime put in execution against them let them markâ— this caâ—e Lands were giuen in â—aâ—le to William Veâ—or and to Elizabeth his wife and to the heires of their two bodiâ—s the remainder to the said Elizabeth and the heires of her body the remainder to Robert Babbington in taile the remainder to the right heire of T. S.