a Disseisor Devise the Land he hath gotten by Disseizin this Devise as to the Disseizee is void Likewise if a Man be Disseized of his Land so that he hath nothing but a Right thereof left and then he Devise this Right or the Land this Devise is also void So if one Contract for Land and pay his Money for the same but hath no Assurance made him of the Land and he Devise the same to another such Devise cannot be good yet possibly he that received the Money may be compellable in a Court of Equity to Assure and Settle the Land according to the Devise Likewise if one Devise another Mans Land such Devise is void but if after such Devise made he Purchase this Land and die without Revocation now is that Devise good Also if A. Bargain and Sell Land to B. on Condition of Re-entry if he pay to B. Twenty Pounds and B. Covenants that he will not take the Profits until default of Payment and A. make a Lease of Seven Years thereof to another and after break the Condition in this case B. may Devise the Land and the Devise will be good 3. If one Devise his Land to the Children of A. B. by this Devise the Children that A. B. hath at the Time of the Devise made or at most at the Time of the Testators death and not such as shall be Born after his death shall take by that Devise and have the Land Also if a Devise of Lands or Goods be made to the Heirs of A. B. he then and at the Time of the Testators death being alive this Devise is void because the person to whom a Devise is made must be capable of the Devise by that Name by which the Devise is made to him when there is no other description whereby to infer the Testators meaning yet if Lands or Goods be Devised to the Executors of A. B. and he die before the Testator and make Executors This is a good Devise to such Executors or if a Man make a Feofment of his Land to the use of his last Will and then Devise that his Feoffees shall be Seized to the use of B. C. This is a good Devise of the Land per intentionem Also a Devise of Land to one paying so much a Year to another with a Clause of Distress upon failure of Payment is a good Devise but a Warranty cannot be made by a a Will Yet if Land be Devised for Life or in Tail Reserving a Rent in this case the Devisors Heirs shall be bound to the Warranty in Law and the Devisee shall take advantage thereof Also a Devise of Land may be made to one and a Devise of a Rent out of the same Land to another in the same Will and both stand good Likewise Land may be Devised to one in Fee and after the same Land in the same Will may be Devised to another for Life or for Years and both these Devises may be good and may well consist together 4. In like manner if a Man in the former part of his Will Devise all his Lands by general words to one in Fee and in the latter part of his Will Devise some special part thereof unto another in Fee Both these Devises are good and may stand together that is The former Devise is good for as much as is not afterwards more specially Devised notwithstanding the Subsequent Specification and the latter is good for so much as is so specially Devised notwithstanding the precedent general Disposition It is otherwise when the general Clause comes last for then the first Devise is void So also it is supposed to be where both the Devises are particular that then the first Devise is void As suppose a Man doth first in his Will Devise Long-acre to A. and his Heirs afterwards in the same Will he doth Devise the same Land to B. and his Heirs in this case some have held the first Devise to A. is void which others have denyed holding that both the Devises are good and that A. and B. in this case shall be joynt-Joynt-Tenants 5. If a Man Devise the Use Profits or Occupation of his Land by this Devise the Land it self is Devised Or if a Man Devise only the Profits of his Land this is a Devise of the Land it self For Lands will pass by words in a Will which will not pass by the same words in a Deed but whatsoever will pass by any Words in a Deed will pass by the same Words in a Will The Reason is because Wills are always more favourably interpreted than Deeds and there is good Reason for that also If a Man says in his Will I give all my Land or all my Tenements to A. B. he shall have not only all the Lands whereof the Devisor is Sole Seized but also all the Lands whereof he is Seized in Common or Co-parcenary with another and not only all the Lands he hath in possession but also the Lands he hath in Reversion of any Estate he hath in Fee-simple But if he say I give all my Lands in Possession only then the Lands he hath in Reversion are excluded out of that Devise 6. If a Man Seized of Land of Fee-simple in the Parish of Grade saith in his Will I give all my Lands in the said Parish to A. B. and after the Will made and published he doth Purchase other Lands in the said Parish and dyeth in this case and by this Devise A. B. shall not have the new Purchased Lands Yet by a new Publication of the Will after the Purchasing of such Lands they will pass to A. B. the Devisee Yea though he hath no Land in the said Parish at the Time of making the said Devise yet if afterwards he doth Purchase Lands in that Parish in this case such ne 〈…〉 Purchased Lands will pass by the said Devise because it shall in that case be intended that he meant to Purchase them Also if a Man hath some Lands in Fee-simple and other Lands only for Years in Dale and he Devise all all his Lands and Tenements in Dale by this Devise the Lands and Tenements he hath for Years doth not pass but if he hath no other Lands in Dale but those for Years in this case probably they will pass 7. A. Deviseth his Lands to M. his Wife until E his Daughter shall accomplish the Age of 21. Years the Reversion to the said E. and the Heirs of her Body upon Condition that she shall pay unto his said Wife during her Life in Recompence of her Dower of all his Lands 20 l. and upon default of Payment he wills his Wife shall enter and enjoy all the Lands during her life the Remainder ut supra the Remainder to I. S. in Tail and dies M. the Wife enters E. the Daughter being within the Age of 14. Years M. takes to Husband I. D. The Husband and
to rest in Peace Vide 4. Ed. 6. tit Estates 78. 29. H. 8. Br. Testam 18. Dyer 371. Wellock Hamonds Case 32. 33. Eliz. Cited in Borastons Case Co. 3. 20 21. And Colliers Case Co. 6. 16. A Man by the Premises of his Will Deviseth his Land to I. S. in Fee and by the Sequele he Deviseth the same Land to I. N. in Fee they both shall take by this Testament and shall be joynt-Joynt-Tenants A Devise made Canonicis Ecclesiae Catholicae Pauli Lond. in perpetuum is a good Devise to all the Canons joyntly in Fee and the Survivor shall have the Entierty the Law is otherwise in Case of a Devise made Civitati Lond. in perpetuum the Corporation of the Mayor and Commonalty shall take by this Devise A Man hath Two Wives and he Deviseth his Land to his latter Wife in Fee the first Wife shall have it Likewise if one hath Two Sons called I. and one of them is a Bastard and Born before Marriage and he makes a Devise to his Son I. the Legitimate I. shall have it and not the Bastard A Man hath Issue a Son and Land is Devised to the Father Habend sibi Haered de corpore suo Legitime procreand and after the Devisee hath Issue another Son the second shall have the Land A Man Seised of Three Messuages Devised by his Testament to his Son A. one of them Naming it and A. to enter after his Wives death and Devised another of the Messuages to his second Son paying 10 l. to his Sister and he to enter at his Age of 21. Years and Devised the Third Messuage to his Third Son in like manner as to his Second Son And after in his Testament willed That if either of his Sons dyed before 21. Years of Age that then his part should be divided among the Survivors and each of them to be the others Heir they all attain to the full Age and the Two Younger Sons paid their Sister the several Sums as was appointed in the Will The Question being what Estate the Two Younger Sons had in those Messuages Devised them by the Will it was held a Fee-simple CHAP. X. Certain Cases touching Devises of Land by way of Entail 1. How Lands Devised by way of Entail may happen to be devested out of one and be vested in another upon the birth of an Issue in Tail 2. Tenant in Tail may not by any Devise Condition or Limitation be Barred from Alienating by suffering a Common Recocovery 3. A Difference in Point of Entail between Devises by Will and Grants by Deed. 4. The several ways of Entails by Devise with the difference between Devising Semini suo and Sanguini suo 5. The Question whether Issue born or not at the time of making the Devise may put a difference between an Estate-Tail and Joynt-Tenancy 6. What shall be a Fee-simple by Deed which is but an Estate-Tail by Devise 7. In what Case the Younger Son may have Fee-simple and the Elder but an Estate-Tail 8. Otherways how an Estate-Tail may be Created by Devise 9. Instances of Law for further illustration of Entails by way of Devise 10. In what case the Word Or shall be taken for And to Create an Estate-Tail by Devise 11. Other Cases of Estates-Tail by Devise with Cross-Remainders 12. An Estate-Tail by Devise with implyed Remainder 13. How there may be a Devise of an Estate-Tail of Rent as well as of Land and how a Tail limited to some Lands shall not extend to others therewith Devised 1. A Man Seised of Lands in Fee Devised them to his Wife for life and after to his Two Sons if they had not Issue Males for their lives and if they had Issue Males then to their Issue Males and if they had not Issue Males then if any of them had Issue Male to the said Issue Male The Wife dyed the Sons entred into the Lands and then the Eldest Son had Issue Male who afterwards entered the Younger Son put out the Issue In this Case the Lands by the birth of the Issue Males are divested out of the Two Sons and vested in the Issue Male of the Eldest and he hath an Estate-Tail therein 2. A Man Seised of Lands in Capite Devised them to his Wife for life and after her decease his Son John to have it and if his Son John marry and have by his Wife any Issue Male of his Body Lawfully begotten then his Son to have it if no Issue Male then his Son Thomas to have the House and if Thomas marry having Issue Males of his Body his Son to have the House after his decease And if any of his Sons or Issue Males go about to Alien or Mortgage the House then the next Heir to enter c. In this Case it was 1 Resolved That the Sons had an Estate-Tail in them severally and to the Heirs Males of their Bodies for that these words if he have no Issue Male his Son Thomas to have it are sufficient to create Tail to John and so of the rest 2 Resolved That no Condition or Limitation be it by Act Executed or by Limitation of Use or by Devise by last Will can Bar Tenant in Tail to Alien by suffering a Common Recovery 3. If a Devise be made of Land to A. B. and the Heirs Males of his Body and he hath Issue only a Daughter who hath Issue a Son the Son shall not take by this Devise Or if such Devise be made to him and the Heirs Females of his Body and he hath Issue only a Son who hath Issue a Daughter she shall not take by this Devise And here Note That in point of Entails there is a Difference between Devises by Will and Grants by Deed for if a Devise of Land be made to A. B. and to his Heirs Males by this Devise A. B. hath an Estate-Tail Otherwise it is if such a Limitation be made by Deed for if one by Deed give Land to another and his Heirs Males by this the Donee hath a Fee-simple and his Heirs General shall have it But if a Devise of Land be to A. B. and to the Eldest Heirs Females of his Body by this Devise all his Daughters and not one of them only shall have it And if a Man Devise his Land to his Wife for life and after to his own right Heirs Males and he hath Issue Three Daughters whereof one after his death hath a Son In this Case and by this Devise the next Collateral Heir Male of the Devisor and not the Son of the Daughter shall have the Land If a Man Devise his Land to A. B. and to his or to the Heirs Males or Heirs Females of his Body or of his Body begotten or to him and his Issues Male or his Issues Female or to him and the Heirs Male of his Body begotten on M. or to him and E. his Wife and the Heirs
if A. dies his Executors not his Heirs shall have it for it is no Inheritance Or if such a Termer grant a Rent out of the Land to A. and his Heirs or the Heirs Male of his body yet shall it go to the Executor not to the Heir for it being derived out of a Chattel it self remains a meer Chattel and becomes not any Inheritance Also if a Rent be granted out of Land to one in Fee-Simple Fee-Taile for Life or Years and it be not paid to him in his life-time the Arrerages shall go to his Executor not to his Heir Or if a man seized of Land and possessed of a stock of Cattel Let it for Years and Covenant with the Lessee that he pay to Him and his Wife their Heirs and Assigns one hundred pound per annum during the Term in this Case after the death of the Lessor his Wife surviving him her Executor and not his Heir shall receive this payment Again if A. grant the next Presentation of the Church of B. unto D. In this Case if D. dies his Executor shall have it as a Chattel Not the Heir Or if A. grant a Lease for years of Land to D. and his Heirs and dies his Executor and not his Heir shall have this Term. And if A. possessed of a Term of years of Land grant it by Deed or give it by Will to D. and his Heirs or to D. and his Heirs Males or devise it by Will to B. for life the remainder to D. and his Heirs in these Cases D. shall have these Terms of years as Chattels and after his death his Executor shall have them Also if a Lessee for life make a Lease for years absolutely This in Law is a Lease for so many years if the life live so long and shall go to the Executor after his death And if one makes a Feoffment in Fee of Land the Feoffee covenanting to do divers things to the Feoffor and to forfeit five pound to him and his Heirs as oft as he shall fail performance and the Feoffee doth fail and break his Covenant divers wayes and the Feoffor dieth in this case his Executor not his Heir shall have and recover all the Forfeitures that are past and unpaid Also if any Goods or Chattels be granted to any Heads of Bodies Politick and their Successors their Executors and not their Successors shall have them In like manner if a Lease for years be made to a Bishop and his Successors and he die his Executor not his Successor is to have it 4. Among the living Chattels Personal that go to the Executor may be comprehended an Apprentice for years the interest of a Debtor in Execution for debt and in a Prisoner taken Jure belli Also Cattel of all kind yea and Fishes in a Pond Conies in a Warren Deer in a Park Pigeons in a Dove-house where the Testator was but a Termer or Lessee thereof for then they are to go to his Executor as Accessory Chattel following the State of their Principal viz. the Pond Warren Park and Dove-house Or if the Conies Pigeons or Deer were all tame they are then likewise to go to the Executor and not to the Heir so likewise are Hawkes reclaimed yea it is felony to steal Hawkes young in the Nest which implyes that they are Goods and belong to the Executor 5. Chattels Personal without life and moveable as all Householdstuff Implements and Utensils Money Plate Jewels Corn Pulse Hay Wood felled Wares Merchandise Ships Carts Plows Coaches c. are evident to belong to the Executor not to the Heir And generally all things sowed and not arising from the Earth without manuring go to the Executorsâ— and such things as grow of themselves to the Heir therefore Corn in the field growing or standing shall go to the Executor Also Hops though not sowen if planted likewise Hemp and Saffron do like Corn growing pertain to the Executor Also after Corn reaped and before the Tythes set out the Inheritor of the Tythes dying his Executor and not his Heir seems to have the best right to the Tythe after set out Also things above ground in Gardens as Mellons of all kind and the like go to the Executor not to the Heir as also all other things as have such a yearly setting or manurance as severs them in interest from the soile Also the Writings and Evidences that concern not the inheritance but only Leases Terms Goods Chattels or Debts pertain to the Executor If one that holdeth Land for the Life of A. B. sow the Land and A. B. happen to die ere it be ripe and cut and he that so holdeth the Land happen to die also before it be ripe the Executor of the Tenant shall have the Corn. And if the Tenant in Tayl sow the Land he doth so hold and die ere it be cut the Executor not he in Reversion nor the Heir nor the Issue in Tayl shall have it Also if A. make a Feoffment of Land to B. excepting the Trees thereon which he afterwards grants to B. for years in this Case the Trees are in the nature of a Chattel and if B. dies his Executor shall enjoy them Or if A. seized in Fee of Lands whereon Trees grow sell these Trees to B. who then dies before they be felled in this Case the Executor or Administrator of B. shall have them and may sell or cut them down Lastly The Executor without contradiction of the Heir may in any convenient time after the Testators death enter into the house descended to the Heir for the removing and taking away of the Goods so as the door be open or at least the key be in the door but he cannot justifie the breaking open of the door of any Chamber to take Goods thence But if the Goods be not removed in convenient time the Heir may distrain them as Dammage Fesante 6. If a Lease for years be made to a Bishop and his Successors and he die his Executor not his Successor is to have it If a Presentment to a Church happen to a Tenant in Tayle and he die before he Presents his Executor not his Issue in Tayle shall Present because the Chattel is not devested Likewise if a Termer have a Presentment which doth happen during the Term though he do not Present yet he shall have it If a Parson Vicar Master of a Hospital or any Body Politick be possessed of any Goods or Chattels in their own Right and die they shall go to their Executors or Administrators not to their Successors If a Lease be made for years or the next Advowson of a Church or Covenant for payment of money or the like be granted or an Obligation made to one and to his Heirs In all these Cases he hath this as a Chattel and it shall go to his
he should have all the Goods and the Kindred be defrauded which is not reasonable and therefore such Administration shall be void CHAP. XXXV Of Succession in the Right Line Ascendent 1. Whether Parents specially the Mother be next of Kin to her Child 2. The method of Succession by the Civil Law in the Right Line Ascendent 3. How the Succession goes by the Civil Law when some of the Collaterals concurr with those of the Ascendent Line 4. Whether by the same Law the deceaseds Brothers and Brothers Children may concurr with their Parents to the Succession 1. NOtwithstanding that Maxime at the Common Law That Inheritance cannot Lineally Ascend yet is the Parent more nigh of blood to the Child even by that Law than is the Uncle And by the Civil Law as the Son and Daughter be in the first degree of Kindred in the Line Descendent So the Father and Mother are in the first degree of Kindred in the Line Ascendent To constitute a Kindred it is sufficient that the Relations do centre and agree in aliquo Tertio or flow from one common Head or Fountain or spring from the same Stock or Root Thus the Father and the Daughter the Mother and the Son the Mother and the Daughter the Father and the Son they flow from one and the same Fountain they spring from the same Root viz. the Grand-Father and therefore are of Kin each to other And by the Laws of this Realm Parents are reputed to be of Kin to their Children and the Mother to be of Kin to her Child and therefore by the Statute Law if a man seized of Lands in Socage his Heir being within the Age of Fourteen years In this case the Mother shall have the Wardship of her Son as being next of Kin to whom the Lands cannot descend Indeed by the Law of the twelfth Table the Mother could not Succeed to her Children nor they to her But this is now altered the Law now being otherwise It cannot be denyed but that this Question viz. Whether the Mother be of Kin to her Child hath been much controverted amongst the ablest Lawyers and in the close of all after much dispute it hath been adjudged in the Negative viz. That the Mother is not of Kin to her Child As in that remarkable of the D. of Suffolk in Ed. the sixth's time wherein an Administration was granted away from the Mother to a Sister of the half blood According to which Judgement divers other Administrations for several years after were granted away from the Mothers to the Brethren and Sisters as next of Kin. Notwithstanding all which the Law indeed being all that while quite otherwise than was practised at last the Truth prevailed and the practice now frequent and Judgement every where given for the Mother that she is of Kin to her Child who dying Issueless and Intestate the Administration of his Goods may be committed to her as next of Kin according to the Statute Or if he be Issueless but not Intestate and maketh his Kin his Executor or bequeath the residue of his Goods to his Kin the Mother in this case is Admissable to the Executrixship as next of Kin to her Child or on the same account to enjoy the Legacy during her life and after her death then the other next of Kin. 2. If the deceased leave no Children they in the Right Line Ascendent do by the Civil Law succeed him but in this Order First the Father and Mother succeed equally and exclusively to all others that are of a more remote degree or the Mother only if the Father be not alive or the Father only if the Mother be dead And if there be several Parents of a distinct Line who are equal in degree but unequal in number they succeed according to their Stock or Root not according to their number thus the Grand-Father by the Fathers side shall have as much as both Grand-Father and Grand-Mother by the Mothers side But if the Parents be in an unequal or different degree then the right of Representation doth cease and the nigher shall ever exclude the more remote Thus the Father excludes both the Grand-Fathers by the Fathers and Mothers side and the Mother both the Grand-Mothers 3. There are also some of the Collateral Line who by the Civil Law do concur with those of the Ascendent Line for the Brothers and Sisters of the deceased do succeed him together with the Father and Mother And the Succession when the Brothers concur is proportioned according to their number But if there be divers Kindred of the same degree to the Intestate whose Father is dead whereof some are by the Fathers side others by the Mothers side as if the deceased leave a Grand-Father by his Fathers side and a Grand-Father and Grand-Mother by the Mothers In this Case the Succession is not proportioned according to their number but it is to be divided into two equal parts and the Grand-Father by the Fathers side draws the one Moity the Rest the other Moity And if it happens that together with those of the Line Ascendent and with Brothers of the whole blood to the deceased there be the Sons of other Brothers of the whole blood deceased In this Case the Sons of such Brothers deceased shall Succeed together with the others but not according to their Number but according to their Stock or Root that is those Sons of such deceased Brothers shall among them all have only that proportion which would have come to their Fathers if they had been alive Here Note that this is meant only of the Children of such Brothers deceased therefore the Grand-children and others more remote are not admitted together with the Parents and Brothers and Sisters of the deceased 4. Brothers and Sisters only of the half blood to the deceased do not concur with the Parents in the Succession Thus the Grand-Father in Succession to his Grand-child doth exclude the Brothers of half blood to such Grand-child unless the Brothers be of the same blood and of the same side with such Grand-Father And if a man dye Intestate leaving a Mother and the Children of his Brothers deceased behind him the Mother alone shall Succeed to the Intestate unless there be other Brothers of the deceased then living for then the said Children of the said Brothers deceased shall concur with the Mother Thus Brothers and Brothers Children may concur with their Parents to the Succession of the deceased but all other Collaterals are excluded by the Parents insomuch that the Uncles both by the Fathers and the Mothers side are excluded by the Grand-Father and Grand-Mother of the deceased CHAP. XXXVI Of Succession in the Line Transversal or Collateral 1. The Line Collateral is Two-fold In which Line the Jus Repraesentationis holds only in Brothers Children not in their Grand-Children 2. Regularly the whole
all Devisable and Two parts of Three though held in Knight-service But then the Will must be in Scriptis not Nuncupative Now though Land be thus Deviseable partly by Custom partly by Statute yet there are certain persons incapable of Devising Lands and there are certain Lands incapable of being Devised as appears by what follows in this Chapter 2. As Lands are now Devisable so there are certain Things in some certain cases that pass by way of Bequest by and under a Devise of Lands As thus A Man Seized of Land Devisable Buildeth a House thereupon the House is Devisable the Law is the same as to a Rent-charge de novo created Also a Man Disseisee of Land Deviseable Deviseth to the Disseisor in Fee in Recompence of a Release which the Disseisor made unto him This is a good Devise Also where a Man hath Land in Right of his Wife and he granteth parcel of it to another and after Deviseth the Residue to another This also is good Likewise where a Man hath a Seigniory to him descended of the part of his Mother and after the Tenancy descendeth unto him of the part of his Father both being Devisable and he not having any Issue In this case he may make Devises to several persons that is the Seigniory to one and the Tenancy to another The Lord Dyer also saith That a Termor of Land which is not Deviseable erecting a Furnace and fixing it in the midst of a House in the said Land may Devise this Furnace Also that where a Man is Seized of Land Deviseable and Deviseth totum statum suum to one and his Heirs This shall be a good Devise for the Land Likewise where a Man deviseth primam vesturam seu tonsuram prati which is Deviseable it is good and the Law is the same as to Trees growing and to grow for ever Also Tenant in Fee-simple or in Fee-taile may Devise the Corn though the Land be not Deviseable but as to Trees in that case the Law is otherwise Also a Man Seized of a Mill may Devise the Runner Stone but not the under Stone unless the Mill it self be Devised Likewise a Man Seized of a Common granteth a Rent out of the Land although that the Land be Deviseable yet that Grant is void and by consequence a Devise thereof Nor is an Advowson in gross Deviseable nor any other Thing which lyeth not in Tenure but a Mesnalty or Seigniory is Deviseable because they lye in Tenure And if the Husband Devise the Corn upon his Wives Land and dyes This is good whether the Corn were Sowen before the Marriage or after 3. The persons not qualified to Devise Lands by Will are such as These viz. A Bishop may not Devise the Land of his Bishoprick but of the Arrearages of the Rent of the Bishoprick he may make a Devise by Testament The Law is the same as to a Deane or Parson of a Church Also the Master of an Hospital cannot Devise the Lands of the Hospital nor the Arrearages of Rent issuing out of the same In a word Spiritual Persons Arch-Bishops Bishops Deanes Arch-Deacons Prebends Parsons Vicars or any Member of a Corporation may not Devise the Land or Goods which they have in right of their Churches or Corporations For the Head or any of the Members of a Corporation cannot make a Testament or a Devise of such Lands or goods they have in Common because they are to go in Succession Also an Infant of the Age of 16. Years Seized of Lands Deviseable who may Alien it by the Custom yet he cannot make a Testament or a Devise thereof or if an Infant maketh a Will of his Land within Age and dyeth after that he cometh to full Age making no Revocation This is not a good Will And yet although an Infant until he be of the Age of 21. Years can make no Devise of his Lands Yet it is held that by special Custom in some places where Land is Deviseable by Custom they may Devise it sooner Also a Woman under Covert cannot make a Devise of her Land with or without her Husbands consent neither to her Husband nor to any other Yet of the Goods she hath as Executrix to another she may make an Executor without his consent but of them she can make no Devise either with or without his consent because they are not Deviseable and if she do Devise them the Devise is void Touching such as are Born both Deaf and Dumb The Lord Dyer says They may make a Will of their Land by Signs Though others Affirm That a Man that is both Deaf and Dumb and that is so by Nature cannot make a Testament but that a Man that is so only by Accident may by Writing or Signs so also may a Man that is only Deaf or Dumb whether by Nature or Accident Also an Alien Born and not Denizon'd cannot make a Testament of his Lands yet if an Alien Purchaseth Land in Fee and maketh a Will and after the King maketh him a Denizon after he dyeth his Will is then good as to his Lands or Goods Also a Traytor Attainted from the Time of the Treason committed can make no Devise either of his his Land or Goods for they are all forfeited to the King yet a Pardon from the King restores him to a capacity of dying Testate as to both Likewise a Man Attainted or Convicted of Felony cannot by Testament Devise either Lands or Goods for they are also forfeited but if he be only Indicted and die before Attainder he is then Testable as to both or being Indicted will not Answer upon his Arraignment his standing Mute may possibly preserve him a power of Devising his Lands And although the Testament of a Felo de se be void as to his Goods and Chattels yet as to his Lands it is good So likewise although a Person Outlawed in a Personal Action cannot so long as the Outlawry doth continue in force make a Testament of his Goods and Chattels yet of his Lands he may not so of Persons Outlawed for Felony the Law is the same as to a Man Attainted of a Praemunire It is otherwise if a Man be only Excommunicated 4. Regularly all Persons who may be Grantees may be also Devisees Insomuch that a Devise of Lands is good within the Statute of Wills even to such persons as to whom a Legacy by the Civil Law is void except in certain cases such as Hereticks Apostates Traytors Felons Excommunicates Out-laws Bastards unlawful Colledges Libellers Sodomites manifect Usurers and Recusants Convict It is a Rule That the Devisee must be capable of the thing Devised at the Time of the Devisors death if it be then to take effect in Possession or if it be a Remainder he must be capable of it at the Time when the Remainder shall happen otherwise the Devise is void If so then a Devise to an Infant
remembred them But for the foresaid Reasons it was adjudged for the Plaintiff That those Lands well passed by the Will Suppose a Man hath Two Sons both named John and conceiving his Eldest Son to be dead he Deviseth his Land by his Will to his Son John generally when in Truth the Eldest Son is living In this Case the Younger Son may alleadge and give in Evidence the Devise to him and may produce Witnesses to prove the Intent of his Father And if no Proof can be made the Devise shall be void for the uncertainty of it Glanvile Serjeant prayed the Opinion of the Court in this Case A Man had Issue a Son and a Daughter and Devised his Lands to his Son in Tail and if he dyed without Issue That it should remain to the next of his Name and dyed The Son dyed without Issue the Daughter being then Married whether she should have the Land was the Question And held per Curiam That she should not For she had lost her Name by her Marriage but it should go to the next Heir-male of the Name But if she had not been Married at the Time of her Brothers death the Daughter should have had it for she was the next of the Name One Devised certain Lands in N. in Tail the Remainder to the next of the Kin of his Name and at the Time of the Devise the next of his Kin was his Brothers Daughter who was then Married to I. S. the Devisor dyed The Tenant in Tail dyed afterwards without Issue Whether the Daughter should have the Land was the Question upon a special Verdict and adjudged without Argument that she should not For she is not now of the Name of the Devisor but of her Husbands Name But if she had been unmarried at the Time of the Devise and death of the Donor although she had been Married at the Time of the death of the Tenant in Tail without Issue yet she should have had the Land Wherefore it was adjudged accordingly Ejectione Firmae For certain Lands in A. upon Evidence to a Jury a Devise was shewn of an House with the Appurtenances and thereby Land in the Field was claimed And Popham doubted whether it should pass But Fenner said That it well might pass And that upon Demurrer in 28. Eliz. it was adjudged accordingly The Defendant then to make it clear shewed That the House was Copyhold and the Land Freehold And the whole Court thereupon conceived That it could not be said Appurtenant although it had been used with it Wherefore the Plaintiff was Nonsuited In the Case between H. and H. all agreed the Case of 13. H. 7. That a Testators Devise to his Heir of his Land after the death of his Feme is a good Devise by Implication to the Feme of that Land during her life for it appears he intended his Heir should not have it until the death of his Feme And none other can have it besides the Feme And therefore it is a good Devise to the Feme by Implication But if such a Devise had been to a Stranger after the death of his Feme it might peradventure have been otherwise for the Heir in the Interim might have had it Note That the Opinion of all the Justices was That if one make his Testament wherein are these words viz. I Release all my Lands c. to A. and to his Heirs It is a good Devise of the said Lands to A. and his Heirs Upon a special Verdict the Case was this A Woman Seised of Lands made her Will and devised the same to one and his Heirs after they Intermarry After Marriage the Woman intending to revoke her Will doth revoke it by words after Marriage and saith That her Husband shall not have the Land by her Will and after dyes Whether the Husband by that Will or the next Heir to his Wife shall have the Land was the Question The Case was Argued Pro Con several Arguments on both sides In fine it was Adjudged That the Will was void and that the Husband could take nothing thereby A Man Devised his Lands to his Wife from Year to Year until his Son I. come to the Age of 20. Years and dies the Wife enters I. dies before he attain the Age of 20. Years And it was moved by Harper whether her Interest were thereby determined And it was held by all the Justices That by the death of the Son the Estate of the Wife was determined and that she had no longer any Estate therein For it is to be intended that the Will of the Devisor was That his Wife should have the Land during the Minority of his Son for that he himself could not Legally dispose of the Land being within Age. And Dyer said That by these words de anno in annum It is intended that the Will of the Devisor was That the Interest of the Wife should determine by the death of his Son But if the Words had been until his Son should Come or might Come to that Age of 20. Years then notwithstanding his death the Estate of the Wife had continued A. Seised of the Mannor of Chessam extending into Chessam and the Town of Hertford and also of Lands in Hertford Devised by Will the Mannor of Chessam to B. his Eldest Son in Tail and the Lands in Hertford to C. his Younger Son It was held by all the Justices That the Younger Son should have all that part of the Mannor of Chessam which lay in the Town of Hertford A. Devised that his Lands should descend to his Son but Willed That his Wife should take the Profits thereof until the full Age of the Son for his Education and bringing up and dyed The Wife Married another Husband and dyed before the full Age of the Son It was the Opinion of the Justices in this Case That the second Husband should not have the Profits of those Lands till the full Age of the Son For nothing is Devised to the Wife but a Confidence and she is a Guardian or Bailiff for to help the Infant which by her death is determined and the same Confidence cannot be transferred to the Husband A Man Seised of a Messuage to which a Garden and a Curtilage did belong Enclosed with a Wall and there was no way to the Garden but through the Messuage He Devised the Messuage to his second Son in Fee not mentioning the Garden nor Curtelage nor saith cum pertinentijs It was Adjudged in this Case That the Garden and Curtelage did pass by this Devise They said a Curtelage is parcel of the House as a Stable and a Dovehouse and the Garden shall pass because it is as well for Necessity to it as for Pleasure A. Seised of Lands had Two Daughters and Devised the Lands to the Eldest and her Heirs that she pay to her Younger Sister yearly 30 l. It was the Opinion of all the
C. and his Heirs or to him and the Heirs of his Body This is a good Devise of the Land in Fee-simple or Fee-tail There are also several other ways of Fee-simple by Will For suppose Land be given to a Man Habend sibi Haeredi suo This indeed is not Fee-simple otherwise it is if it be given sibi duobus Haeredibus suis tantum So if Land be given to a Man Habend sibi Haered with warranty of the Land sibi Haeredibus suis This is a good Fee-simple Or if a Man Devise Land to A. B. for his Life and after to the Heirs or to the right Heirs of A. B. By these Devises A. B. hath a Fee-simple in the Land Also if one Devise his Land to his Wife to dispose thereof at her will and pleasure and to give it to one of her Sons by this Devise she hath a Fee-simple but it is qualified for she must Convey it to one of her Children and cannot Convey it to another 2. When in a Will power is given to a Devisee of Land by the Testator to Sell that Land such Devisee hath a Fee-simple in that Land for power to Sell giveth by Implication an Estate in Fee-simple Also if one Devise his Land to A. B. paying 10 l. without other words By this the Devisee hath the Fee-simple of the Land albeit the 10 l. be not the Dundredth partvalue of the Land In like manner If one Devise Land whereof he is Seized in Fee to A. B. paying 10 l. to G. D. By this Devise albeit there be no Estate expressed yet A. B. hath the Fee-simple of the Land in respect of the Payment of the Money This holds True only in case the Intent of the Testator doth not appear to be otherwise 3. If one in his will devise his Land to his Wife in the first place and then saith my Will is That my Son A. shall have it after my Wives death and if my Wife dye before my Son B. that then my Son A. shall pay to B. 10 l. by the Year during the Life of B. and also 100 l. to I. S. In this Case A. shall have the Fee-simple of the Land Also if one Devise his Land in this manner viz. I give White-acre to my Eldest Son and his Heirs for his part Item Black-acre to my youngest Son for his part by this Devise the the Youngest Son shall have the Fee-simple of Black-acre Or thus I give White-acre to A. B. Item Black-acre to A. B. and his Heirs by this Devise A. B. shall have the Fee-simple as well of White-acre as of Black-acre 4. If a Man Devise his Land in this manner Item I give to A. B. and C. D. and their Hoirs my Land in Kent equally or my Land in Kent equally to be divided by these words A. B. and C. D. shall have and hold the Land not as joynt-Joynt-Tenants but as Tenants in Common so that the Heir and not the Survivor shall have his part that first dyeth And yet in case of such a Limitation by Deed it is otherwise But if one Devise his Land to A. B. and C. D. and their Heirs without more words it seems that by this Devise they shall take and hold as joynt-Joynt-Tenants Yet if one Devise Land to A. B. and C. D. and the Heirs of either of their Bodies lawfully begotten it seems that by this Devise A. B. and C. D. shall take and hold as Tenants in Common and not as Joynt-Tenants Likewise the Case is the same if one Devise his Land to A. B. and C. D. in this manner viz. I Will that A. B. and C. D. shall have my Lands in Kent and occupy them indifferently to them and their Heirs But if one who hath Two Daughters only give or Devise his Land to them in Fee by this Devise they shall take as joynt-Joynt-Tenants and not be in by Descent as Partners for the Testators Will shall take place 5. If Land be given to the Mayor and Commonalty of London or any other Corporation to have and to hold for Term of their Lives it is a Fee-simple Or if a Man say I give to A. B. my House with all the Lands for 21. Years and that A. B. shall have all my Inheritance provided it be not contrary to Law In this Case A. B. shall have the Fee Or if he give it to his right Heirs Males and Issue of his Issue of his Name this also is a Fee-simple And although it be affirmed by some That if the Testator Devise his Land to A. B. and his Assigns without saying For ever A. B. shall have an Estate only for Life Yet the contrary is Asserted by others and that it is a Fee-simple 6. If a Testator saith I will my Land to my Son A. during his Life and after his decease to my Son B. And in case my Son A. shall hereafter Purchase Lands of as good Value as that Land for my Son B. that then my Son A. shall Sell the Land Devised to my Son B. as his own and shall pay 20 l. to C. D. In this Case A. hath a Fee-simple implyed by the Power which A. hath to Sell beside the Payment of Money Also if one Devise Land to me and my Heirs and in Case the Heir at Law put me out that then I shall have other Land instead thereof in this Case and by this Devise I have the Fee-simple of the first Land notwithstanding the latter words Likewise if a Testator Devise Land to me for my life the Remainder to his own Son and the Heirs Males of his Body and in default of such Issue the Remainder to the next Heir-male of the Testator and the Heirs-males of his Body In this Case the next Heir-male of the Son hath an Estate in Fee-simple 7. Suppose a Man Seised of Lands make his Will in this manner viz. Imp. I Devise to my Wife Black-acre for her life the Remainder to my Son T. in Tail Item I Will to my Son T. all my Lands in D. also all my Lands in S. also my Lands in V. Also I give to the said T. my Son all my Island or Land enclosed with Water which I Purchased of I. S. To have and to hold all the said last before Devised Premises to the said T. my Son and the Heir of his Body In this Case the Habendum shall extend to all the Lands in D. S. and V. and shall not limit the Devise only to the Island because the thing last Devised by the Will was an Island in the Singular Number which cannot Answer to the Habendum in the Plural which if extensive to the Island only T. then should have but for Life in the Lands of D. S. and V. But it was otherwise Resolved viz. That the Habendum should extend to all the Lands in D. S. and V.
8. A Man Seised of a Messuage holden in Socage in Fee Devised the same by these words I Devise my Messuage where I dwell to A. B. and her Assigns for 10. Years and A. B. shall have all my Inheritances if the Law will In this Case the Devise in Fee of the Messuage is good and by the general words of the Will all his Inheritances do also pass 9. If a Man Devise Lands to one for ever there he hath a Fee for such an Estate might be conveyed by Act Executed But if he further Devise That if the Devisee do such an Act that then another shall have the Land to him and his Heirs the same is void for when as he hath disposed of the Estate in Fee to one he hath not power after in the same Will to dispose the same to another it being a Rule in Law That such an Estate which cannot by the Rules of the Common Law be conveyed by Grant Executed in his life time by Advice of Council learned in the Law such an Estate cannot be Devised by the Will of a Man who is presumed to be void of Council 10. A Man having Lands in Fee-simple and goods to the Value of 5 l. only Devised to his Wife all his Estate paying his Debts and Legacies his Debts and Legacies amounting to 40 l. It was Adjuged in this Case That all his Lands did pass by the Devise and that the Devisee had a Fee-simple in the Lands the word Paying enforcing it for they are to be paid presently which cannot be if the Lands pass not in Fee And if a Man Deviseth all his Rents It was held That all his Lands do pass 11. Note That by intendment of Law a Devise shall be for the benefit of the Devisee and not to his prejudice As if Land to the Value of 3 l. per annum be Devised to A. and that A. shall pay out of it 50 s. per annum In this Case A. hath but an Estate for life for he may pay it out of the Profits of the Lands and is sure to be at no loss But if it be Devised to B. for life the Remainder to A. paying 50 s. per annum out of it In this Case A. hath a Fee-simple by Implication because after the Payment thereof A. may dye before he can receive satisfaction for the same out of the Profits of the Land and therefore such Devise shall be a Fee-simple because the Law intends that the Devise was for the benefit of the Devisee 12. Note also That if a Man hath Lands in Fee and Lands for Years and he Deviseth all his Lands and Tenements the Fee-simple Lands pass only and not the Lease for Years 2 If a Man hath a Lease for Years and no Freehold and Deviseth all his Lands and Tenements the Lease for Years passeth 3 That if one Deviseth his Lands which he hath by Lease to his Executor for life the Remainder over that there ought to be a special Assent thereunto by the Executors as to a Legacy otherwise it is not Executed 13. A. Devised his Lands in London to his Son and his Heirs after the decease of his Wife and in Case his Daughter should Survive his Wife and his Son and his Heirs that then the Daughters should have it for Life and after their death I. and R. should have the same and that they should pay 6 l. 16 s. yearly to the Company of Merchant-Taylors to be disposed of to Charitable Uses In this Case three Points were Argued 1 Whether the Wife had an Estate for life by Implication of the Will And it was Resolved That she had 2 Whether the Son had a Fee-simple or Fee-tail And it was Resolved That he had a Fee-tail by Implication of these words viz. if his Daughters Survive his Wife and his Son and his Heirs whereby it is plainly implyed That the Heirs there intended are the Heirs of his Body and not his Heirs in Fee for so long as the Daughters live the Son could not dye without a Collateral Heir 3 What Estate I. and R. have after the death of the Daughters And as to That it was Resolved That they have a Fee-simple by Reason of the Annual Payment of Money and it is not to be regarded what Annual Value the Land is of over and above the Sums they pay for every Sum of Money paid or payable doth cause the Devisee to have a Fee-simple And Coke Chief Justice said That a Devise to A. and his Successors is a Devise of a Fee-simple without the word Heirs because it implyes a Fee-simple although it wants the express words Between L. Plaintiff and B. Defendant L. Seised of Land in Fee Devised it unto Two Persons Equaliter and to their Heirs Whether this made them joynt-Joynt-Tenants or Tenants in Common was the Question It was holden by the whole Court That they were Joynt-Tenants and not Tenants in Common A Man Seised of Lands Devised them by his Testament to his Wife to dispose and imploy them for her and his Sons at her own Will and Pleasure And it was held by Dyer Weston and Welch That she had a Fee by such words as if he had Devised the Lands for ever For the Construction of Law supplies the defect in these words of the Devisor according to his meaning And it was held by Dyer and Welch That the Estate in her is Conditional because these words ea intentione make a Condition in every Devise but not in a Feofment Gift or Grant unless it be in Case of the King And these words do amount as much as to say she should not convey it away to a Stranger but keep it and give it to his Sons S. Seised of Land in Fee holden in Socage and Devisable in Gavelkind Devised it to his Feme for her life paying 3 l. per annum to T. his Son during his life and that he should take but Two Load of Wood for Fire-boot And if she dyed before the said T. then he Devised all his Lands to R. his Son paying to the said T. 3 l. per annum and paying to such one of his Sisters 20 s. and to another Sister 20 s. The Feme dyes R. enters The Question was what Estate R. had by this Devise And it was Adjudged he had a Fee For when he Devised it to his Feme for life expresly c. and to R. generally without limiting the Estate and apppointed him to pay to T. 3 l. per annum during his life That carries in it an Intendment that he should have Fee especially when his Father therein further willed That his Son R. should pay two other Sums in Gross and none of them to be out of the Profits it is by Intendment and by Implication a Fee wherefore upon the first Argument it was Adjudged for the Defendant for they said That these Things which have been so often Adjudged ought
Male or the Heirs Female of their Two Bodies begotten or to him and his Heirs if he shall have any Heirs of his Body else that the Land shall revert or to him and his Heirs if he shall have any Issue of his Body or to him and the right Heirs Male of his Body or to him and his Heirs provided that if he die without Heirs of his Body that then the Land shall revert by all these and such like Devises an Estate Tail may be Created of the Land so Devised Likewise if one Devise his Land in Dale to A. B. semini suo by these Words A. B. hath an Estate Tail But if he say I give my Land in Dale to A. B. sanguini suo it is said That by this Devise A. B. hath the Fee-simple of the Land 5. Suppose a Devise be made thus viz. I give my Land in Dale to A. B. for life the Remainder to C. D. and E. his Wife and their Children or to them and their Men-children or to them and their Issues by these Devises if C. D. and E. his Wife have no Children at the Time of the Devise an Estate Tail is Created but if they have any Children at the time of the Devise then hereby is Created an Estate for all their lives only in Joynt-tenancy 6. If one Devise his Land to his Wife for life the Remainder to his Son and if his Son die without Issue not having a Son that then it shall remain over this is a good Estate Tail Likewise if Lands be Devised to A. B. and his Heirs Males or his Heirs Females without saying of his Body by this Devise A. B. hath an Estate Tail But if such a Limitation be by Deed it is said to be a Fee-simple 7. If one having Two Sons Devise part of his Land to his Eldest Son and his Heirs another part of his Land to his Youngest Son and his Heirs and if either of them dye without Issue that then the other shall be his Heir by this Devise either of them hath an Estate Tail and no Fee-simple But if one Devise his Land to his Eldest Son and his Heirs and if he dye without Heirs of his Body that it shall remain to his Youngest Son and his Heirs by this Devise the Eldest Son hath an Estate Tail and the Youngest Son the Fee-simple 8. If one Devise his Land to his Son W. S. and if he marry and have an Issue Male begotten of the Body of his Wife then that Issue to have it and if he have no Issue Male then to others in Remainder by this Devise it seems W. S. hath an Estate Tail to him and the Issues Male begotten of the Body of his Wife Also if one Devise Long-acre to A. and then say Item Broad-acre to A. and the Heirs of his Body by this Devise he hath an Estate Tail in both Acres 9. If one Devise his Land to his Wife for years the Remainder to his Younger Son and his Heirs and if either of his Two Sons die without Issue c. that it shall remain to his Daughter and her Heirs and the Younger Son die in the life Time of the Father and after the Father dyeth it seems by this Devise the Elder Son shall have the Land in Tail Or if one Devise his Land to his Wife for life and after to his Son and if his Son die without Issue having no Son or having no Male that then it shall go to another by this Devise the Son hath an Estate Tail to him and the Heirs Males of his Body Or if Lands be Devised to Man and Woman unmarried and the Heirs of their Two Bodies or to the Husband of A. and Wife of B. and the Heirs of their Two Bodies by these Devises are made Estates in Tail 10. If Land be Devised to A. B. and the Heirs of his Body and that if he die it shall reman to C. D. by this Devise A. B. hath an Estate Tail and the latter words do not qualifie the former but C. D. must attend the death of A. B. without Heirs of his Body before he shall have the Land Also if Lands be Devised to A. B. and the Heirs he shall have by C. his Wife by this Devise A. B. hath a Fee-Tail and not a Fee-simple Likewise if one Devise Land to his Son and his Heirs and that if his Son die within the Age of 21. Years or without Issue that the Land shall remain over and the Son dyeth within Age having Issue in this case and by this Devise the Son hath an Estate Tail and Or in this place shall be taken for And 11. If a Man Devise his Land in this manner viz. I give White-acre to my Son A. and his Heirs Black-acre to my Son B. and his Heirs and Green-acre to my Son C. and his Heirs provided that if all my said Sons die without Issue of their Bodies that then all my said Lands shall go to M. my Wife and her Heirs by this Devise they have all of them Estates in Tail of their Land and as it seems Cross-Remainders to either of them of the Land of each other Also if one Devise his Land to A. B. and if he die without Issue Male of his Body then that it shall remain over to C. D. by this Devise A. B. hath an Estate Tail 12. If a Man having Issue Three Sons Devise his Lands in this manner viz. One part to Two of his Sons in Tail and another part to his Third Son in Tail and that neither of them shall Sell his part but that either of them shall be Heir to other by this Devise either of them hath an Estate-Tail and if one of them die without Issue his part shall not revert to the Eldest but shall remain to the other Son for it is an implyed Remainder 13. If one Devise to A. B. that if he and the Heirs of his Body be not paid 20 l. Rent yearly he and they shall distrain by this Devise A. B. hath an Estate-Tail of this Rent Also if a Man Devise his Mannor of D. to his Eldest Son and also all his Lands in S. in Tail in that case the Entail is limited for the Land in S. and shall not extend to the Mannor of D. But if the words had been I Devise my Mannor of D. and all my Lands in S. to my Son in Tail the Son had had an Estate Tail in both But suppose a Man Deviseth his Lands to his Wife for Life the Remainder to his Son in Tail and if he die without Issue the Land to remain to A. B. and his Wife for their lives and after their deceases to their Children In this Case the Court was divided whether the Children of A. B. had an Estate in Tail or only an Estate for life Mich. 40. Eliz. in B. R. Goldesb 138.
and that this doth but set forth the Time when the Estate of A. B. shall begin and that the Intent of the Testator is That his Heir shall have it until that Time The Reason of the difference is because a Man is bound to provide for his own not so for a Stranger and so the Law presumes what Nature doth teach 6. If one Devise his Land in this manner viz. I give my Land in D. to A. B. to the intent that with the Profits thereof he shall bring up my Child or my Children or to the intent that with the Profits thereof he shall pay to I. M. 10 l. or to the intent that out of the Profits thereof he shall pay yearly 10 l. By these Devises A. B. hath only an Estate for life albeit the Payments to be made be greater than the Rents of the Land Otherwise it is in case the Sum of Money is to be paid presently and not appointed to be paid out of the Profits of the Land in which case A. B. should have a Fee-simple in the Land 7. If the Father of A. be Tenant for life of Land the Remainder to A. in Fee And A. devise the Land to his Wife Rendring for her natural life 5 l. to the right Heir of the Father of A. by this Devise the Wife of A. hath an Estate for life after the death of his Father 8. Land was Devised to Husband and Wife and after their decease to their Children they then having Issue a Son and a Daughter In this case the Husband and Wife have but an Estate for Term of their lives the Remainder to their Children for life and no Estate Tail for the intent of the Testator here shall be construed according to the Rules of the Common Law and by the Common Law the Husband and Wife have but an Estate for their lives with a Remainder to their Children for their lives 9. The Son Seised of a Remainder in Fee after the death of his Father who was Tenant for life devised the same by these Words viz. I Devise to D. my Wife the Lands which I have or may have in Reversion after the death of my Father paying therefore yearly during her life to the right Heirs of my Father 40 s. and dyed his Father living It was the Opinion of the Court That no Estate passed by this Devise but for Term of the life of the Wife and that she should not pay the 40 s. until the Reversion did fall after the death of the Father 10. A. Seised of divers Lands in A. B. and C. the Lands in C. being in him by Mortgage forfeited Devised the Lands in A. and B. to several Persons and then adds this Clause in his Will All the rest of the Goods Chattels Leases Estates Mortgages whereof he was possessed he devised to his Wife after his Debts and Legacies paid made his Wife his Executrix and dyed The Wife entered into the Mortgaged Lands and devised it to the Defendant and his Heirs and dyed The Question was whether the Fee passed to the Wife by this Devise by the Name of all his Estate Mortgages c. It was the Opinion of the whole Court That an Estate for life only passed unto her and not a Fee by Implication of the general words in the Will 11. Note That there is a difference when one Deviseth his Term for life the Remainder over and when a Man Deviseth the Land or his Lease or Farm or the Occupation or Use or Profits of his Land For in a Will the intent and meaning of the Devisor is to be observed and the Law makes construction of the Words to answer and satisfie his intent and puts them into such order that his Will shall take effect And when a Man deviseth his Lease to one for life it is as much as to say He shall have so many Years in it as he shall live and that if he dyeth within the Term that another shall have it for the Residue of the Years And although at the beginning it is uncertain how may Years he shall live yet when he dyeth it is certain how many Years he hath lived and how many Years the other shall have and so by a subsequent Act all is made certain A Man made his Will in this manner Item I give my Mannor of Dale to my second Son Item I give my Mannor of Sale to my said Son and his Heirs what Estate he had in the Mannor of Dale was the Question It was held by Dyer Weston and Welch That in the first he had but an Estate for life for that it is as much as to say as if he would give his Mannor of Dale to him for his life for that as much is included therein without saying His Heirs And that Item seems a new Gift to a greater degree in the second place to make amends for the other Brown e Contra and that the Item is a Conjuntion Copulative and that the word Heirs expressed in the latter Clause extends to both the Mannors But if the Word Heirs were put in the Gift of the former Lands it would be otherwise Dyer if in the first place or Clause there were not any person named but that the words were Item I give the Mannor of D. Item I give the Mannor of S. to I. K. and his Heirs there and in that Case it would refer to both the Mannors W. C. by his Will Devised a Messuage in these words viz. I give to A. L. my Cousin the Fee-simple of my House and after her decease to W. her Son The Judges held That A. L. had an Estate for life and her Son a Fee-simple in Remainder And so it was adjudged R. D. Seised in Fee of a House and Possess'd of Goods made his Will in these words viz. The rest of my Goods Lands and Moveables whatsoever after my Debts Legacies and Funeralls paid to my Three Children I. T. and M. equally to be divided amongst them And it was Adjudged That they have an Estate only for life in the House and are Tenants in Common not Joynt-tenants CHAP. XII Certain Cases in the Law touching Devises of Leases or for a Term of Years 1. In what Case the Word Shall is taken for Should in Devise of a Term. 2. A Devise of Lands for 99. Years may be only for no more of that Term then the Issue Male of the Devisee shall continue 3. The Devise of a Term to one and his Heirs shall go to the Devisees Executors or Administrators and not to his Heirs 4. Chattel-Leases and Leases for Years pass not by a Devise of all his Lands and Tenements 5. By a Lease for Years Devised for Life doth pass the whole Term yet is it not an Estate for Life 6. The whole Interest of a Lessee in his Lease-Lands doth pass by a Devise of his Lease Term Farm Profits Tenure or Occupation thereof as
well as by any other words 7. The Residue of a Term is as the Term it self 8. A Man may Devise such an Estate by Will which he cannot make by Act Executed Or he may Create an Interest by his Will which by Grant or Conveyance in his life time he could not do 9. That may be the Devise of a Lease for Years in Law which doth not seem to appear such in Fact 10. The whole Term though not named shall pass by a Devise where no other can pass by Implication 1. IF one Devise his Land unto his Executors until his Son shall come unto the Age of 21. Years the Profits to be imployed towards the performance of his Will and when he shall come to that Age that then his Son and his Heirs shall have it By this Devise the Executors shall have it until he be of 21. years of Age and if he die before that time the Executors shall also have it until the time he should have been 21. Years of Age if he had lived so long and the word Shall in this case is taken for Should Likewise if one Devise his Land to his Executors for the payment of his Debts and until his Debts be paid by this Devise the Executors have but a Chattel and an uncertain Interest and they and their Executors shall hold it until the Debts be paid and no longer 2. If one Devise his Land to A. B. and the Heirs males of his Body for the Term of 99. Years it seems that by this Devise A. B. hath but a Lease for so many Years if the Heirs Males of his Body shall so long continue and that for want of Issue Male the Term of Years shall expire And in this case the Executor or Administrator not the Heirs Males of A. B. shall have it after his death 3. If one possessed of a Term of Years Devise the same to another and his Heirs or his Heirs Male by this Devise the Executors or Administrators not the Heirs of the Legatee shall have it So that if a Lessee for Years of Land Devise all his Interest therein to his Wife if she live so long and after her death if any part of the Term be to come Devise the same to A. B. his Son and to the Heirs of his Body in this Case and by this Devise the Executors or Administrators of A. B. and not his Heirs shall have it 4. If a Man Devise all his Lands and Tenements in D. yet Leases for Years do not pass by these words for by Lands and Tenements is intended Frank-tenements or Free-hold and not Chattels 5. If one hath a Lease for Years of Land and Devise it to A. B. for life by this Devise the whole Term is Devised and A. B. shall have the whole Term if he live so long and yet A. B. shall not have an Estate for life by this Devise So likewise the Law seems to be the same upon a Grant by Deed made in that manner And if a Man possessed of a Term of Years of Land Devise his Term or his Lease or the Land it self by a Devise in either of these words the whole Term doth pass A Term of Years is Devised to the Church-wardens of the Church of D. and to their Successors This is not good but for Goods so Devised the Law is otherwise A Man who hath a Term Deviseth the Land to one and his Heirs the Devisee dyeth and hath Executors his Heirs shall have the Land and not his Executors The Law is otherwise if the entire Term were so Devised 6. If a Lessee Devise his Lease or his Term or his Farm or his Profits Tenure or Occupation thereof by either of these Devises his whole Lease and all his Interest in the Land is bequeathed as well as by any other form of words But if a Man Devise his Land only for so many Years as his Executor shall name it seems this Devise is not good Yet if it be for so many Years as A. B. shall name and he name a certain Number of Years in the Testators Life Time this is a good Devise 7 A Man possessed of a Term of Years may Devise all the Residue of that Term of Years that shall be to come at the Time of his death And if a Testator having only a Term of Years in certain Lands doth Devise the said Land to A. B. and doth not say for what Time it seems that by this Devise the whole Term is devised unless the Testators Intent doth appear to be otherwise 8. A Man possessed of a Term for 40. Years by his Will Deviseth the same to I. S. after the death of his Wife and that the Wife should enjoy it during her life and that I. S. should neither Devise it nor Sell it but leave it to descend to his Son and in the mean Time my Will is That my Wife shall have the use thereof during her life yielding 10 l. Yearly to I. S. during her life at Two Feasts and made his Wife Executrix and dyed The Wife entered and paid the 10 l. Yearly according to the Will In this Case Three Points are Resolved 1 That I. S. doth not take by way of Remainder but by way of Executory Devise And a Man may Devise such an Estate by his Will which he cannot make by Act executed And that the Case is no more but this That after the death of I. S. the Wife should have the Residue of the Term. 2 The Devise is good being but a Chattel which may vest and devest at the pleasure of the Devisor 3 That there is no difference when one Deviseth his Term the Remainder over and when a Man Deviseth his Land or his Lease or the Use or Occupation or the Profits of his Land That a Man by his Will may Create an Interest which by Grant or Conveyance he cannot Create in his life Time 9. A. Devised his Lands to his Daughter and her Heirs when she came to the Age of 18. Years and that the Wife should take the Profits of the Land to her Use without any accompt to be made until the Daughter come to 18. Years and made his Wife his Executrix and dyed provided the Wife should pay the old Rents and find the Daughter at School the Wife enters proves the Will takes Husband and dyes It was found that all the Conditions were performed and that the Daughter was within the Age of 18. Years It was Resolved in this Case That it was a Term for Years in the Wife and a good Lease 10. A Man was Lessee for 40. Years of a House and by his Will gave the House to I. S. without limiting any Estate That he should have in it It was the Opinion of the Court That he should have the whole for no other Estate in the House either for Life or at Will shall pass by Implication or for one Year
this case she hath those Lands for life and she having no Issue hath not any Interest to dispose but hath an Authority to nominate two who shall dispose of the Lands and they may make Sale thereof 9. A man did Devise his Lands which were held in Socage to be sold by his Executors and that the Money thereof coming should be disposed of in payment of special Legacies which he Appointed by his said Will the Executors sold the Lands One of the Legatees after the Will was Proved sued the Executors in the Ecclesiastical Court for his Legacy whereupon a Prohibition was prayed It was resolved in that Case 1 That the Money was Assets in the Executors hands 2 That there was no Remedy for it but by Suit in the Ecclesiastical Court and therefore a Prohibition did not lye in the Case But Querie of the second payment for it was held by all the Justices of both Benches Where a man Deviseth that his Executors shall sell Lands and of the Money coming shall give such a Portion to his Daughter That this was not a Legacy because going out of Lands and that Suit did not lye for it in the Ecclesiastical Court But an Accompt lyes at Law for the Money And therefore in that case a Prohibition was granted to stay the Suit in the Ecclesiastical Court 10. A Devise was made to A. B. for life the Remainder to C. D. in tayle and if C. D. dye without Issue of his body that then the Land shall be sold by his Executors he maketh two Executors and dyeth A. B. dyeth C. D. dyeth without Issue of his body In this case it seemeth that one of these Executors alone can not sell the Lands 11. A man Devised his Lands to his Wife for term of her life the Remainder to D. his Daughter in tayle and if she dyed without Issue that then after the death of his Wife the Lands should be sold for the best value by his Executors with the Assent of A. and B. And made his Wife and a Stranger his Executors and dyed the Wife Entered and dyed A. and B. dyed and the Executor who survived sold the Land alone The Opinion of the Court was That the Sale was not good because he wanted sufficient Authority 12. A man seised of divers Mannors and Lands Devised all the said Mannors and Lands to his Sister and her Heirs for ever Except out of this General Grant my Mannor of R. which I do Appoint to pay my Debts and made two Executors by Name and dyed One of the Executors dyed the other took upon him the charge and Execution of the Will and afterward sold the Mannor of R. for 300 l. for the purpose aforesaid in Fee It was the Opinion of the Court that he might well sell it for by the Circumstances it appeareth That such was the Testators intent and not to leave the Reversion to Discend to his Heir but to trust his Executors with the Sale of it for the payment of his Debts 13. A. made B. and C. his Executors and by his Will appointed that they should have and hold the Issues and Profits of his Lands until his Heir should come to the age of 21 years to the intent that the Executors with the Profits thereof should pay his Debts and Legacies and bring up his Children One of the Executors dyed the surviving Executor made his Executor and dyed also the Heir being within age It was the Opinion of the Court in this case that the Executor of the survivor might receive the profits of the Lands and dispose of them during the Non-age of the Heir because it was an Interest in the Executors and not an Authority or a Trust only 14. If a man hath Feoffees and makes his Will That his Executors shall alien his Land if the Executors Refuse the Administration of his Goods yet they may sell the Lands because the Will is not of a thing Testamentary But the Executors have not a power to meddle with the Land unless such a special power be given to them If a man makes his Will of his Lands and that his Executors without naming them by their proper Names shall sell them if they refuse to be Executors yet they may sell the Land But if a man makes his Will that his Lands which his Feoffees have shall be sold and doth not say by whom the Executors shall sell the same and not his Feoffees because the Moneys which come by the Sale shall be Assets in the hands of the Executors which is a proof that they may sell them And if his Will be That the Executors shall sell the Lands before the Alienation the Heir may take and Receive the profits thereof and if no Sale be made the Heir shall hold the Land for ever 15. A man Deviseth That his Executors shall sell his Lands Now by the Stat. of 21. H. 8. cap. 4. If the one refuseth the other may sell the Lands but the Sale can not be made to him who refuseth 16. A man made his Will and made A. B. C. D. his Executors and Devised his Lands to the said A. B. C. D. by their special Names and to their Heirs And further Devised that the Devisees should sell the Lands to F. G. if he would give for it before such a day 100 l. and if he would not that then they should sell it to any other to the performance of his Will viz. the payment of his Debts F. G. would not give the 100 l. one of the Executors refused to intermeddle the other three sold the Land It was the Opinion of the Court that the same being a special and a Joynt-Trust that it could not survive and that the Sale by the Three was void 17. By the Premises it is Evident That if a man Willeth that his Executors shall sell his Lands for the payment of his Debts and they all dye but one and the survivor make the Sale the Vendee shall not have the Land and that the Law is otherwise if the Lands were Devised to the Executors to be sold The Reason is as aforesaid because in the former case the Executors have only an Authority in the other case they have an Interest But if a man maketh two Executors and willeth that they shall sell the Lands for the payment of his Debts And they sell it only for term of life the Remainder to one of themselves and the Vendee dyeth he in the Remainder may Enter Sed Q. CHAP. XVII Of Legacies and Devises in respect of Marriage As also Between Husband and Wife 1. A Condition of Marriage may be annexed to a Legacy but an unlawful Condition thereof is void and doth not prejudice the same 2. A Condition of Marriage with the Consent of a Third person doth oblige the Legatary to Marry if he will have the Legacy but doth not oblige him to have such Consent 3. A
the Devise of a House with all things therein 32. The Difference between a Devise of a Chamber and the Devise of a Shop 33. The Devise of a Field carries also the Edifice erected thereon 34. The Civil Law where the Fee of Land is Devised to one and the Rents of the same Land to another 35. in what Case an error or mistake in the Testator may be a prejudice to the Legatee 36. A Legacy or Devise may be inferr'd as well from the Testators Intention as Expression 37. A Devise by Reason of an Omission of that whereof the Testator said he would make a description is not void 38. A Legacy to Two whereof one is not accrews in the whole to the other that is 39. Further Exemplifications of Law touching Devise of Houses altered burnt and re-edified 40. An Exception of a Thing which is not is no prejudice to the Devisee 41. The same thing Conditionally twice Devised by two Testators to several Persons how or in what Case good to either or not 42. By a Devise of ground doth pass the Edifice thereon albeit it were erected after the Devise made 43. How a Devise is to be apportioned where the Devisees are joyned in the thing Devised but disjoyned in the manner of Devising 44. A Devise of Lands by a certain Name carries all of that Name though otherwise distinct unless the Testator intended otherwise 45. Any words that do but plainly declare the Testators meaning may serve for a Devise 46. The Executor shall pay the Land-lords Rent for Ground in Lease the Fruit or Proceed whereof is Devised to another for the Term. 47. A mistake in the Testator only of the Scituation of the Lands Devised shall not prejudice the Devise 48. The difference between necessary and voluntary Alienations prohibited to Devisees by a Testator 49 A Tripartite Case in point of Alienation prohibited by a Testator 50. How the disjunctive Or in Legacies and Devises is frequently understood for the conjunctive And. WHere a Man is Seised of a House in Fee or of Land in Fee and may devise such House or Land in such case may Devise the Doors Windows Wainscot or the like Incidents of the House also the Trees and Grass growing upon such Land Otherwise it is with a Tenant in Tail for Life or Years in Houses or Land 2 If a man hath an Use that is not Executed by the Stat. of Uses but remains at the Common Law he may make a good Devise thereof And therefore if one possessed of a Term of years grant it over to another to the use of the Grantor he may Dispose this use by his Will for it is in the Nature of a Chattel 3. One that hath Money to be paid him on a Mortgage may Devise this Money when it comes If A. Enfeoffe B. of Land upon Condition that if B. do not pay A. 100 l. such a day that then A. may Re-enter In this case A. may Devise this 100 l. if it be paid and the Legacy is good albeit it be made before the day of Payment come 4. A Man cannot Devisc by his Will any Real Chattels that he hath only in right of his Wife nor the Obligations that are made to her alone before or during the Coverture nor the Chattels Real or Personal which she hath in right only of another as Executrix But all her own proper Goods and Chattels Personal and all Obligations made to them both during Coverture he may Devise by Testament 5. A Bishop cannot by his Testament Devise the Presentation of a Church that became void in his time yet if he or the Parson of a Church have the Advowson thereof in Fee and Devise that Two or Three of his Executors shall present at the next Avoidance this is a good Devise 6. By a Devise of Immoveables which are Chattels real do pass Leases Rents and the like and by a Bequest of Moveables which are Chattels Personal will pass Bonds and Specialties but Debts pass not by either of these Devises By Immoveables are understood not only the foresaid Chattels-real but also in some sense Trees growing on the Ground Fruit on the Trees Terms of Years and the like and by Moveables are Regularly understood all Goods both Actually Moving and Passively Moveable 7. If a Man Bequeath to A. B. all his Goods he shall thereby have the Testators whole Estate his Lands Tenements and Freehold excepted and thereby the Debts and Money If he Bequeath to him all his Chattels he shall have thereby all as in the former Case If he Bequeath to him all his Moveables he shall have all his Personal Goods both quick and dead and if he Beqneath to him all his Immoveables he shall have all the Testators Leases and all the Natural Fruits thereof as Grass on the Ground Fruit on the Trees and the like consequently Fishes in a Pond Pidgeons in the Dovehouse c. as Appurtenances to the Ground Devised as well as the Natural Fruits or Grass growing on the same 8. If a Man Devise all his Goods and Chattels to A. B. and die and A. B. die also before he hath proved the Testators Will in this Case the Administration of the Goods and Chattels of the said Testator shall be committed to the next of Kin of the said A. B. and not to the next of Kin of the said Testator because in this Case A. B. was the universal Successor 9. If a Woman under Coverture Devise her Land then publish and approve it after her her Husbands death when she is sole by this means that Devise which was Originally void is now become good But if she make and publish it during the Coverture albeit her Husband doth afterward die and she become sole yet this accident alone without a new publication after her Husbands death will not make that Devise good The Law is the same as to Goods and Chattels 10. In like Manner if an Infant within Age as to Lands or within Age as to Goods Devise the one or Bequeath the other and publish the Will and after he come to full and competent Age publish and Approve it again By this means the Devise or Legacy becomes good otherwise it is in Case he do not Publish and Approve it when he attains to Full and Competent Age. 11. Suppose the Testator doth Devise in this manner viz. I Will that my Executor shall pay 100 l. to A. B. by the Tenth day of March next after my decease and if otherwise then my Will is That my Executor shall Surrender to him all the Right I have in a Lease of my Ground called Black-acre and dies The Executor doth not pay to A. B. above 90 l. by the day Appointed In this Case A. B. restoring the said 90 l. to the Executor shall have the said Ground and he may detain the Money till he recover the Land 12. Suppose the Testator doth Devise the
Anne she shall have both And this is the Common opinion from which notwithstanding there are not wanting and they not of the minor DD. who recede in their Judgments and held That a Disjunctive in a Legacy ought to retain its force so as the Executor may be least burdened which seems nothing inferiour to Reason in an impartial ballance yet this may be relyed on as indubitable that where the Disjunctive is placed between two such things as are commonly conceived under the notions of Genus and Species or between the whole and his part then and in such case it shall be taken for a Conjunctive as if the Testator should say I bequeath to my Wife my Plate Jewels or such things as I provided for her the latter words whereof are Generical the former Specifical she shall have both Or if he saith I bequeath to my Wife my Wine which is in the City or in the Port the Port is held as part of the City and she shall have the Wine in both Likewise if any thing be bequeathed to D. E. or F. G. here in this case also the word or shall be taken for the Copulative and so that both of them shall equally take by this Devise unless the one be of nearer kin to the Testator than the other in which case the nearest of kin shall have it for his life the other afterwards or unless it can be proved that the Testator did bear more affection to the one than to the other in which case he to whom the Testator did bear most affection shall be preferred or unless the one of them is not legally capable of the Legacy in which case the word or shall stand as properly it is for a Disjunctive One Devised his Lands to his three Daughters and said further in these words viz. I will that every of them be others Heir by equal portions Whereupon it was doubted when one of them dyed whether the others should hold by survivorship as joynt-Joynt-Tenants Or in this case as Tenants in Common The whole Court was of opinion for the latter and not as Joynt-Tenants for that it appear'd the intention of the Donor was such in saying That each should be others Heir by equal portions which could not be if there were a survivor for thereby it is not possible the words of the Will can be of any force Although properly Houses pass not by the name of the Lands yet in a Devise they shall pass by the Name of all the Lands if the intendment be not otherwise by some Expressions of the Devisor for though in a Writ nothing shall be demanded or recovered but according to its proper signification yet in Wills Expressions shall be taken according to the Common intendment Wherefore in a Will by the Devise of his Land all his Houses may pass or not according as it is phrased by the Devisor For if a man Devise all his Lands his Houses shall pass but if he restrain the word Land according to its genuine propriety as Arable Land or doth couple it with Meadow and Pasture in such case the exposition of the word shall be taken according to the common intendment of the Devisor or having both Houses and Lands in A. and B. doth say I bequeath to C. all my Houses and Lands in A. And to D. all my Lands in B. In such case and by such expression the Devisor seems to exclude the Houses in B. out of the Devise to D. which expresly he includes in the Devise to C. Moore succinctly Reports the case thus viz. Debt for Rent the Defendant pleaded nihil debet Whereupon it was found That J. S. being seised of three Houses and other Lands Pastures and Meadows in Watford in the County of Hertford as also of a House and Land in the County of Oxford Devised the same in this manner viz I give all my Capital Messuage in the County of Oxon and all other my Lands and Meadows and Pasture in the Parish of Watford The Devisee brought Debt against the Lessee for years of the Houses in Watford And it was adjudged Maintainable because the word Land comprehends Houses and the Houses shall pass by the Devise CHAP. XX. Cases in the Law touching Legacies of Chattels Personal 1. CHattels Personal may be bequeathed to one for life and afterwards to another in which case the first hath only the use or occupation the other hath only the Propriety thereof So that if one Will that A. B. shall enjoy the use of his Houshold-stuff during his life and after that it shall remain to J. M. This is a good Devise thereof to J. M. But if the thing it self be bequeathed to the first of them then it is otherwise for the gift of a Chattel Personal though but for one hour is the gift thereof for ever Provided the Testator make it Absolute not Conditional 2. Chattels Personal do pass under the legal Notion of Moveables as Chattels Real do under that of Immoveables of both which the Law makes a Distinction into Creatures Living and Things inanimate albeit of the living Chattels Real there can but very few instances be given Such was Wardship in respect of the Tenure of Land As also Villenage for years or that right which the Lord had in the Villain only for a Term who resembled him whom the Civil Law terms Ascriptitius Glebae or one in perpetual Obligation to the Plow on some certain Lands The Real Chattels Inanimate chiefly consist in Houses or Lands or the issues thereof as by Lease for years or by Extent upon Judgments Statutes or Recognizances Or if the Testator had a Term of years in certain Advowsons Tythes Profits of Fairs Markets or Court Leets the Interest is a Real Chattel among the things inanimate likewise a Presentation to a Church upon the next avoidance and before it come to be void is a Real Chattel But of this and Chattels Personal with their respective Individuals the Reader may have a more exact Description if he hath a retrospect to Cap. 6. Par. 3. whereunto he is referred for clearer satisfaction 3. A. B. having two Brothers and one Son makes his Son his Executor and in his Will saith That he would have his Son let the said two Brothers who are the Sons Uncles have all the goods he hath in D. and M. or elsewhere saying withall That all these things he doth leave them for this Reason because he would not that his Son should have any Difference or Controversie with them In this case and by this Devise A. B. seems to leave his two Brothers only what was in common between him and them and no more This interpretation being grounded on the Reason annexed at the close of the Testators words where he saith Because his Son should have no difference or Controversie with them by which Reason he seems to have a prospect of Differences like to arise between him and
part not expressed is a Moiety implyed p. 293. § 23. p. 310. § 11. p. 441. § 49 50. Paying In what Sense that word shall be construed only as a Limitation not as a Condition p. 267 268. § 5. Payment not full in what case Equivalent to none at all p. 289. § 11. PiousVses Testaments to that end their Priviledges p. 8. § 4. Poor disagreement among the DD. touching Legacies to the Poor in such generall words p. 291. § 18. Pope whether he may alter the Wills of Testators p. 149. § 107. Portion of Goods not expressing what proportion Bequeathed signifies 〈◊〉 Mâ—ity p. 447. § 100. Portions or Filiall Portions the Law in that case p. 167 c. Possibilities in Expectation are Devisable as well as Possessions in Actual Demes 〈…〉 es p 311 § ult Presentations void not Devisable p 288 § 5. To whom belongs the Presentation in case of Intestation p 82 § 6. Prisoners In what Sense said to be Intestable or not p 15 § 3. Priviledged Testaments what the severall kinds thereof p. 7 § 1. Probate of Testaments the Law thereof when where how by and before whom with the Fees thereof p. 35 c. In what case the Executor may be compelled to Prove the Will notwithstanding his former refusall and thereupon Letters of Administration granted to another p. 165 § 2. What Proof Requisite for the Probate of a Will p. 40. c. Prohibition in what Cases it doth not lie p 113 § 7. In what Cases touching Lands Devised to be Sold a Prohibition may lie or not p 275 § 9. It doth not lie in case of the Husbands Release for the Wives Legacy p. 282 § ult R. Recovery by Fraud against an Executor no Plea in Barre to a just Debt p 108 109 § 7. Refusalls to Prove the Will p 39 40 § 6. How to Proceed in case of Refusall of Executorship p. 91 92 § 1. It is no absolute Barre to a Subsequent Administration p Ibid. § 3. It may be done by a Letter Extrajudicially as well as by a Judiciall Act. p 93 § ult How Refusers to Administer may yet afterwards be admitted or excluded p. 163 § ult Refusall in one to take by a Devise shall not prejudice him in Reversion or Remainder p 263. § 9 13. Release or Discharge in what Sense it may be said to be Bequeathed p 322 § 3 p 439 § 32. To Release is a good word to Devise Lands by p 235 in fin A Release of Actions by an Administrator whose Letters of Administration are after Revoked is void p 216 § ult Action for Executors upon a a Release p. 103. § ult Remainders and Reversions Devised p 261 c. What of that kind may be Devised p Ibid § 1. Remainders and Cross-Remainders by Devise of Estate Tail p 252 § 11. With Implyed Remainders Ibid § 12. Remainders Entail'd by Devise and by Deed how they differ p 262 § 7. Remainders Devised to a Church accrews to the Parson thereof Ibid. § 8 He in Remainder or Reversion shall not be prejudiced by the Refusall of him that should take by a Devise p 263 § 9 13. How the Issue of the Daughters without naming them shall have the Devised Remainder in preference to the Issue of the Sons Ibid. § 10. Several Cases wherein he in Remainder may Devise his Remainder p Ibid. § 13. Reversion of Land for life may be Devised by the Lessor notwithstanding a Feoffment in Fee p 264 § 16. Remainder of a Rent-charge is Devisable to one where the Land out of which it arises is Devised to another Ibid. § 17. A Devise may be good for the Reversion of a Term where it is otherwise for the Rent p 264 § 18. Remainder Devised may be good where yet an Estate Tail precedes Ibid. § 19. He in Remainder may instantly take where the Devisee is incapable Ibid. § 20. Remainder may be Devised by one to his own right Heirs Ibid. § 21. Reversion may be Devised by the name of all a Mans Inheritances or Hereditaments p. 265 § 22. Remainder Devised to the next of Blood Ibid. § 23. In what case Remainder after Remainder makes the former Remainder but an Estate for Life p. Ibid. § 24. Remainders Devised what void p 261. § 2 p 262 § 3 to 6 p 264 § 15. A Hundred Years to come Devised for Life the Remainder over is a void Remainder p. 263 § 11. Remainder in Fee after a Lease Devised by him in Remainder is a void Remainder if the Lessor Re-enter Ibid § 12. Remainder after a Fee Devised is Indeviseable albeit such Devise were but Conditional p 263 § 14. A Term of Years by way of Remainder is Devisable but a Devise by way of Entail with remainders over is void p Ibid § 15. Rents Devised p 270 c. As Devisable as the Land itself Ibid § 1. They are Devisable for another mans life Ibid § 2. Rents issuing out of a Common not Devisable § 3. Several ways of Devising Rents § 4. Reversion of Rents Devised upon a false suggestion a void Devise p 271 § 5. Rent Devised in what case the Land it self doth thereby pass p 138 § ult What Rent not Devisable p 225 § 2. In what case the Rent is due to the Heir not to the Executor p 103 104 § ult Rent due to the Executors of the Husband of the Tenant in Dower Ibid. Rent of Land in Fee received by Executors no Assets because belonging to the Heir p 85 § 3. The Land-lords Rent is payable by the Executor for the Ground whose fruit for the Term may be Devised to another p 298 § 46. Residue of a Term is as Devisable as the Term it self p 258 § 7. Residuary-Regatary hath an Advantage when others Refuse p. 291 § 17. Retainer of a Testators Goods by an Executor to pay himself good p 133 § ult p 149 § ult Reviver of a Will Revoked p. 34 § 1. Revocations Testamentary the severall kinds thereof p 31 § 1. Revocations by Marriage Ibid § 2. Revocation of a Will by a Wife after Marriage whether good or not p. 236 § ult Whether Revocation of Administration may without any Sentence in Court be by the Bishop who granted it p 166 167 § ult Revocations of Legacies and Devises p 331 c. What amounts to a Revocation of a Devise of Land p 228 in fin Severall Cases in Law touching what shall amount to a Revocation or Countermand of a Legacy or Devise p. 443 § ult Four Cases wherein Legacies are irrevocable p 443 § 74. S. Sale of Lands Devised to be made by Executors p 273 c. with or without the Assent of others p 274. § 5. In what case it may or not be by one alone where there are Two or more Executors p 275 276 § 10 12. How it becomes void for want of sufficient Authority p 175 § 11. In what Case it may be made by
cap. 2. h Plow 144. Fitz. Devise 7. a St. 32. H. 8. c. 1. St. 34. H. 8. c. 5 Coke sup Lic III. Perk. Sect. 544. Lit. Sect. 287. Dyer 210. Old N. B. 89 Perk. Sect 500. 539 540. 446. 497 498. A man seized of Land Deviseable Deviseth totum staâ—um suum to one and his Heirs This is good for the Land Dyers Read on Stat. of Wills Sect. 4. §. 6. b Plow 485. c NevillsCase d Plow 144. Fitz. Devise 7. e Adjudged Powscley and Blakemans Case A man Deviseth his Land to Elianor the Daughter of I. S. and he hath divers Daughters whereof one is named Hellen and none Elianor This is a good Devise to Hellen Vid. Dyer's Read Stat. on Wills Sect. 3. §. 15. f Pasch 9. Jac. New mans Case g Co. sup Lit. 386. h Plow 523. 540. Dyer 357. Co. 8. 24. 83. i 38. Eliz. Co. Banc. k Quaere Dyer in his Lect. 1. per Inst Dodr. l Co. 8. 94. Plow 525. m Brownl 80. 1. Part. n Plowd 66. o Plow 343 344. Old N. B. 89. Fitz. Devise 17. p Trin. 37. Eliz. B. R. Breckford vers Parincote q Hill 20. Jac B. R. Loftis vers Baker r Mich. 30. El. in C. B. Geslin Werburrons Case Leon. Rep. p. 137 138. s 5. P. M. vid. Owen 30. Hugh Abridg. t Mich. 24. Car. in B. R. rot 2052. Preston and Holmes's Case Styles 148 149. u Trin. 1649. rot 849. in B. R. Beal and Wyman's Case Styles 240. x 42. Eliz. in C. B. Tayler and Sawyers Case y Trin. 20. Jac. in B. R. rot 811. Knights Case Godbolt 358. z Mich. 2. Car. in B. R. Baffield and Byboro's Case Popham 188. a Dyer's Read on the Stat. of Wills Sect. 3. § 5. b Mich 8. Eli. in C. B. Leon. 3. Part. 11. Hughe's Abr. 3. Vol. in Appen tit Wills Testaments and Devises c Trin. 36. Eliz. Browne and Pease Case Anders Rep. Case 315. d Trin. 37. El. Beckford vers Parnecott Cro. par 3. e Mich 34. El. In the Court of Wards The Lord Cheneys Case Co. 5. part 67. f Mich. 48 39. Eliz. C. B. Bon. vers Smith Cro. par 3. pl. 64. g Trin. 39. Eliz. C. B. Jobsons Case Cro. par 3. h Mich. 41. Eliz. B. R. Yates vers Clinkard Cro. par 3. i Trin. 2. Jac. Horton vers Horton B. R. Cro. par 2. pl. 4 k Mich. 37. H. 8. Anders Case 83. l Mich. 30 31 C. B. Ander Case 117. vid. dict Case m Pasc 5. El. Moo Rep. nu 143. n Mich. 30. El. in c. B. Sir Ant. Denny's Case Leon. 2 Part. 190. Hugh's Abridg. Appen tit Devis o Pasc 16. El. in B. R. Leon. 2. Part. 221. Hughs Abridg. ibid. p Hill 30. Eli. B. R. Carden Tucks Case Cro. 3. Part. 89. Hughe's ibid q Trin. 30. El. B. R. Crickmere Patersons Case Cro. 3. Part. 146. Hughe's ibid. r Mich. 30. El. B. R. Bon Smith's Case Cro. 3 Part. 532. vid. Trin. 39. Eliz. c. B. Johsons Case Cro. 3 Part. 576. Adjudged acc s Pasc 30. El. B. R. Nash Edwards Case Leon. 113. It was the Opinion of the whole Court that the Devise was vaid and Wray Chief Justice said That if he Appoint A. to write his Will and it is Written by B. the Devise is void But if after he ha Written the Will he had Read it to the Devisor and he confirmed it it had been a good Will It was the Opinion of the Court That the Plaintiff being Heir at Law should have Judgement to Recover the Lands against the Three Sisters t Trin. 30. El. Rot. 1160. Whisker Cleytons Case Leon. Rep. p. 156. u Hill 43. Eli. B. R. Beckford Parnecoles Case Goldesb 150. vid. Bret. Rigdens Case Plow Com. 340 w Mich. 45. Eliz. in c. B. Rot. 125. Kerry Dirricks Case Cro. 2. Part. 104. Hughs Abridg. tit Devise x Vid. Plow d Com. 342. in a Bret Rigdens Case a Lit. Broo. Sect. 133. Perk. Sect. 1. 6. Lit. Sect. 586. Kelway 43. Co. sup Lit. 19 20. H. 6. 35. Lit. Bâ— Sect. 432. 19. H. 8. 10. b Dyer Lect. in Stat. Wills cap. 5. §. 1. c Ibid. d Dyer ubi supra cap. 3. §. 3. e Co. 6. 16. Dyer 126. f 18. Jac. B. R. Green vers Dewel g Mic. 13. Jac. B. R. Dyer Sect 307. h Hill 17. Jac. B. R. Adjudge ed. Spicers Case i Trin. 30. El. If I Devise Lands to two equally divided between them they are Tenants in Common But if I Devise Lands to Two equally to be divided between them by I. S. Till such Division be made they are joynt-Joynt-Tenants Mich. 31. Eliz. in B. R. Dickons Marshes Case Goldesbr 182 183. k Adjudged Lowen vers Cox Mich. 37 38. El. Com. B. Dyer 25. Lit. Broo. Sect. 133. Lit. 283. Perk. Sect. 170. Dyer 350. l Dyer 326. m Pasch 9. Jac Newmans Cafe Brown Rep. 1. part 131. 169. n Goldsb 141. Plow 53. o Dyer Lecture in Stat. of Wills Sect. 5. §. 13. p Hob. Rep. 7. q Brown 129. 147. 149. 1. part part 2. 272. 177. r Co. sup Lit. 9. Perk. Sect. 57 239 New Terms of Law tit Devise s Trin. 2. Car. in B. R. t Mich. 18. Jac. B. R. Green vers Dewel u Pasch 14. Jac. in B. R. w Perk. Sect. 567. x Trin. 28. El. in C. B. rot 1458. Wiseman Wisemans Case Leon. Rep. 57. 58. y Mich 11. Jac. in C. B. Wedlock Hardings Case Godbolt 208. z Co. 1. part 85. in Corbets Case a Trin. 1651. in B. R. Kirman Johnsons case Styles 293 Mich. 45. Eliz. in C. B. Riches case b Ibid. c Coo. 6. part 16. Colliers case d Trin. 7. Car. in B. R. Rose Bartlets case Cro. 1. part 213. Trin. 14. Jac. B. R. Moo Rep. Gu. 1164. Lowen Bedds case Anders par 2. case 10. Pasch 6. El. Moo Rep nu 162. Pasc 17. Jac. B. R. Spicer vers Spicer Coke the Queens Attourney demanded of the Court A Man hath Two Daughters being his Heirs Deviseth his Land to them their Heirs and dyes Whether shall they take as joynt-Joynt-Tenants by Devise or as Coparceners by Descent And all the Justices held clearly That they shall have it as Joynt-Tenants for the Devise giveth it them in another Degree then the Common Law would have given it them and after the benefit of Survivorship between them Anonimus Cro. par 3. B. R. e Dyer's Read on Stat. of Wills Sect. 3. §. 3. f Ibid. §. 8. g Ibid. §. 16. h Ibid. §. 17. i Ibid. §. 18. Mich. 15 16. Eliz. Anders case 100. a Hill 13. Jac. in B. R. Blanfords Case Godbold 266. b Hill 8. Jac. in the Court of Wards Sandays Case Co. 9. part 128. c Terms of Law tit Devise Co. sup Lit. 25. Plow 414. d 27. H. 8. c. 17 e Coo. sup Lit. 27. f Trin. 9.
other priviledges which the Law doth indulge to such Testaments inter Liberos 4. The Priviledges of Testaments made for good and pious uses being such as are made to Orphans Widows Strangers Prisoners Lame and Diseased persons being poor and indigent to Hospitals Schooles Colledges also for the redemption of Captives repairing of City-Walls Bridges and such like are chiefly these four viz. 1. This kind of Testaments may be written with strange and unaccustomed Characters yet shall be good and effectual 2. If the Testament ad pios usus be found Cancelled and it be not known whether the Testator did willingly cancel the same the Law presumes it to be unadvisedly cancelled whereas in other Testaments the contrary is presumed but in this kind of Testaments ad pios usus if it be not certainly known that the Testator did wittingly cancel the same it shall be in effect as if it had not been cancelled at all 3. In this kind of Testaments it is sufficient that the condition if any be be observed and accomplished by other means than according to the precise form of the condition Whereas in other Testaments or Legacies it is not sufficient unless the condition be precisely observed 4. The Testament ad pios usus is not void in respect of uncertainty as other Testaments are And generally most Priviledges that do belong to other priviledged Testaments do belong also unto this Testament ad pios usus 5. Testaments Vnpriviledged are such as have not any benefit or freedom above or contrary to the common course of ordinary Law but are generally obliged to the observation of such Requisites as the Law regularly appoints for all Testaments CHAP. VI. Of Codicils 1. The etymon and original of the word 2. The definitiâ—â— of a Codicil 3. Codicil may be made with or without writing before or after the Testament 4. Who may make a Codicil and whether more Codicils than one may consist together 1. A Codicil in the Etymologie thereof doth signifie a little Book Codicillus being but the diminitive of Codex you may if you please call a Testament a great Book and a Codicil a little Book or writing The Original of these Codicils was meerly occasional for when by reason of the multiplicity of legal Solemnities requisite to a Testament which are not so to a Codicil the Testator failing of sufficient opportunity to make a Testament Solemn was enforced to fly to the refuge of a Codicil for declaration of his Will to be performed post mortem Or otherwise as additional to the Testament touching something therein omitted or explanatory to it touching something therein ambiguous or derogatory to it touching something therefrom to be detracted 2. Every man that writes of this Subject abounds in his own sence touching the definition of a Codicil but he will be found least in errour who defines a Codicil to be the just Sentence of our Will touching that which we would have done after our death without the appointing of an Executor Yet here observe that the word Just is not so comprehensive in this case as in the definition of a Testament for here it doth not signifie those Solemnities and ritual Formalities which are Testamentary but only an exclusion of illegalities and inclusion of such perfections as are consistent with the nature of a Codicil so that we may not improperly infer That a Codicil is a kind of an unsolemn Last Will. 3. A Codicil may in effect be made either in writing or without it provided you do not call it a Nuncupative Codicil that being an abuse of words for if a Codicil may as aforesaid be called a Little Book or Writing it is improper to call it Nuncupative therefore although all the power and force of a Codicil may be made without writing yet being so made it may not otherwise than improperly and abusivè be termed a Codicil but rather something Loco Codicilli and which hath the full force and effect of a Codicil Also a Codicil may be made as well by him who dieth Intestate as by him who dieth Testate Neither is it material whether it be made before or after the Testament for in both cases it shall be reputed as part and parcel of the Testament and to have equal force with it unless being made before the Testament it be revoked in the Testament or be contrary to what is contained therein 4. Persons capable or incapable of making Testaments are even such also as to Codicils Yet a man may die with divers Codicils and the latter shall not as in divers Testaments null the former so as the one be not contrary to the other And if in such Codicils it not appearing which was first or last one and the same thing be given to one person in the one and to another person in the other the Codicils are not void but the persons therein named ought to divide the thing equally betwixt them CHAP. VII What Persons are incapable of making Testaments or Last Wills REgularly every person hath full Power and Liberty to make a Testament or Last Will and therein may dispose of his Goods and Chattels except such persons as are prohibited by Law or Custome whereof some are prohibited because they want Discretion such are Children Mad Folks Ideots Old Persons grown Childish and such as are drunk Others because they want Freedome and Liberty such are Villains Captives and Women Covert Others because they want some of their principal Senses such are the Deaf and Dumb and Blind Others because they are Criminous such are Traytors Felons wilfull Self-murtherers and the like Others because of certain Legal impediments such are Out-lawed Persons men at the point of Death Alien Enemies and such others But here Note that all the said persons are not in all cases absolutely and utterly intestable for that some of them are intestable but in some Cases only as will more distinctly appear hereafter Note also that the King his Heirs and Successors may lawfully make their Testaments and that Execution shall be done of the same The Lord Cook makes mention of the Testament of King H. 4. and his Executors refusing the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury was to grant Administration with the Testament annexed CHAP. VIII Of persons Intestable by reason of the want of Discretion 1. Of Children in Minority 2. Of Mad Persons and proof of Insanity 3. Of Ideots or Natural Fools 4. Of Persons grown Childish by reason of Old Age. 5. Of such as are Drunk 6. Law-Cases relating to the third Paragraph of this Chapter 1. AN Infant-Male at the Age of fourteen years and Female at the Age of twelve years may make a Testament touching Goods and Chattels although both Sexes in construction of Law are Minors or Infants untill the Age of twenty one years till which Age neither of them can make any Conveyance of Land good in Law
And before the said respective Ages of twelve and fourteen years neither of them can make any Testament at all no though it be ad pios usus But at the accomplishment of the said respective Ages each of them may even without the consent of his or her Guardian or Parent if they have any Goods in their own right make a Testament thereof though not of Lands of Inheritance unless the Custome of the place doth enable them for it But before the said respective Ages neither of their Testaments is good though made by the approbation and with the consent of their Guardians yea though they afterwards attain to the said Ages and then neglect to ratifie them But if he or she hath attained to the last day of the said Ages of twelve or fourteen years the Testament so made by him in the very last day of the Age of fourteen years or by her in the very last day of the Age of twelve years is as good and lawful as if the said day were then already expired or if after the accomplishment of the said Ages respectively he or she doth expresly approve and ratifie the Testament made during their minority then is the same made good and effectual by this new declaration thereof 2. Such as are Mad persons can make no Testament during the time of their insanity of mind no not so much as ad pios usus Nay the Testament made at such a time shall not be good though afterward the party recover his former understanding howbeit if such Lunatick persons have any Lucida intervalla or intermissions then during the time of such freedome from the Lunacy they may make their Testaments betwixt the fits And here Note that every person is presumed to be of perfect mind and memory until the contrary be proved So that he that objecteth Insanity of mind must prove the same for which it is sufficient if he prove that the Testator was beside himself or had lost his Reason but just before he made his Testament though he prove not the Testators madness at the very time of making the same unless the contrary be proved or circumstances to induce a contrary presumption For it is a very tender and difficult point to prove a man not to have the use of his Reason and Understanding therefore it is not sufficient for the Witnesses to depose that the person was mad unless withall they render upon knowledge a sufficient reason thereof Neither is one Witness sufficient to prove a man mad nor two in case the one depose of the Testators madness at one time and the other of his madness at another time but both agreeing in time if then the one Witness deposeth of one mad act the other of another mad act at one and the same time these sufficiently prove that the Testator was then mad though they do not both depose of one and the same mad act But in contrary depositions these Witnesses are to be preferred which depose that the Testator was sound of memory And if he used to have some intervals of Reason and it be not certainly known whether the Testament were made in or out of his fits of Lunacy in this case if no argument of frenzie or folly can be collected by the Testament it shall be presumed to be made during the intermissions of the Lunacy and so adjudged to be good yea though it cannot be proved that the Testator used to have any clear and calm intermissions at all provided the same Testament be wisely and orderly made otherwise not For in this case the least word sounding to folly is sufficient to induce a presumption that the Lunatick person had no intermission of perfect Reason and sound Memory at the making of such Testament for one foolish word in that case may frustrate the validity of the whole But if a man who is of good and perfect Memory maketh his Will and afterwards by the visitation of God he becomes of unsound Memory as every man for the most part before his death is this Act of God shall not be a Revocation of his Will which he made when he was of good and perfect memory Cook 4. part 124. Beverlyes Case 3. Ideots are likewise excluded from making Testaments nor may they dispose either of their Lands or of their Goods But he that only is of a mean capacity or understanding or one who is as it were betwixt a man of ordinary capacity and a fool such an one is not prohibited from making a Testament provided that he hath understanding enough to conceive what is the nature of a Testament or Last Will being well informed thereof otherwise he being destitute of such understanding is not fit to make a Will Here Note that by the Laws of this Land he that can measure a yard of cloth or rightly name the dayes of the week or beget a Child shall not be accounted an Ideot or a Natural Fool yet it will not be indisputably granted that an Act so Natural as the begetting of a Child can so qualifie a Natural Fool as to render him in the charitablest construction of Law Testable For if he be such a Natural Fool as that though of Lawful Age yet cannot declare of about what Age he is nor number twenty nor knoweth his Natural Parents by their several names and Relations or the like easie questions such an Ideot is undoubtedly intestable Notwithstanding all which if it may appear by sufficient circumstances and conjectures that such Ideots had the use of Reason and Understanding at such time as they did make their Testaments then are such Testaments good in Law 4. Persons grown Childish by reason of old Age can no more make their Testaments then Children yet old Age alone doth never deprive a man of the power of making his Testament But when a man by reason of extream old Age is become even a Child again in his Understanding or rather in the want thereof or by reason of extreme old Age or other infirmity is become so forgetful that he now knoweth not his own Name he is then no more fit to make a Testament then is a Natural Fool or Child or Lunatick person 5. Such as are Drunk during the time of their being Drunk can make no Testament that shall be good in Law yet understand this as only when he is so excessively drunk that he is altogether deprived for the time of the use of Reason and Understanding being according to the Flaggon-phrase as it were dead-drunk for if he be but so drunk that his Understanding is but somewhat clouded and obscured and his Memory but troubled he may in that case make his Testament and it may be good in Law 6. A. Executor of J. S. brought
Executors Age of Seventeen years and that Administration committed after that Age of the Executor is meerly void and notwithstanding this averment here the Executor might be above the age of Seventeen years and within the age of Twenty one years It was therefore adjudged Quod Quaerens nihil caperet c. 5. Co. 29. Trespass upon a special Verdict the Case was Jackson Lessee for years by several Leases of divers Lands some of them in the Diocess of York some in another Peculiar in the same Diocess devised all these Leases to his Son and made his Daughter within Age his Executrix the Mother takes Administration durante minori aetate of the Executrix in F. the Peculiar where the Testator died ad Commodum proficuum Executricis the Administratrix granted this Term durante minori aetate of the Executrix to the Plaintiff Whether the Grant were good or not was the principal Question The Court resolved that it was not good For such an Administrator hath but a special property ad proficuum Executoris but not a general property as another Executor or Administrator hath and therefore his sale of Goods unless they be Bona peritura or it be for necessity for the payment of debts which he is chargeable to pay it shall not bind But he may sue and be sued and yet his Authority is but a limited Authority and therefore like as if Letters ad Colligendum bona Defuncti were granted to one there he may sell bona peritura as Fruit or the like 2. It was moved whether the Assent of an Administrator durante minori aetate to the devise of a Term or the Assent of the Executor himself during his minority to such a Devise be good Anderson said That an Executor at the Age of Eighteen years may Assent but whether the Assent by such an Administrator be good or not they doubted 3. It was moved whether Administration should in this case be granted at Two places viz. the one within the Peculiar the other by the Arch-Bishop of York Ordinary of the Diocess or whether he should have the Prerogative in both as he had where Bona Notabilia were in divers Diocesses And it was resolved That there should be two Letters of Administration granted for the Arch-Bishop shall not have any Prerogative here because this Peculiar was first derived out of his Jurisdiction wherefore c. 5. Co. 29. Errour of a Judgement in Debt in C. B. The Errour assigned was because the Plaintiff sues by an Atturney where he was an Infant and ought to sue by Guardian But because the Action was brought by him as Administrator so that he sued in auter droit Infancy is no impediment unto him no more than Out-lawrie and therefore he might well sue by Atturney and it was thereupon adjudged for the Defendant that the first Judgement should be affirmed Note that if an Infant sue and not as Executor he must then sue by his Guardian vid. Case Bartholomew vers Dighton Hill 37 Eliz. B. R. in Cro. Rep. part 1. Pl. 22. Debt upon an Obligation made to the Testator The Defendant Pleaded a Release made by one of the Plaintiffs The Plaintiff replyes That this Release was made without any consideration and he who Released was within Age at the time of the Release made and it was thereupon demurred and adjudged for the Plaintiff that it was a void Release being by an Infant without consideration In the Case between A. and M. as Administratrix of J. during the minority of L. It was among other things Objected That the Plaintiffs Declaration was not good because it is brought against her as Administratrix durante minori aetate of L. And it is not averr'd that the said L. was yet within the age of Seventeen years sed non allocatur for true it is that if one brings an Action and entitles himself as Administrator durante minori aetate of one such he ought to shew that he is yet within the Age of Seventeen years as Co. 5. fol. 59. Pigots Case For that he is to take Conuzance how long his Authority shall continue and he ought to shew it to enable himself to the Action But when he brings the Action against one as Administrator durante minori aetate there such Plea need not be shewn for so long as the other continues his medling he shall be sued and the Plaintiffs need not take Conuzance of the age of the other as c. And here if her Authority were determined it should be shewn on the Defendants part therefore the Judgement was affirmed Note it was resolved by all the Justices of England That the Release of a Debt or a Duty by an Infant Executor after Probate made of the Will is not good because it should be a Devastavit and charge the Infant of his own Goods and also it should be a wrong which an Infant by his Release cannot do and also because it is not pursuant to the Office of an Executor Infant Executor Administration was committed durante minori aetate debt was brought against the Administrator and then the Infant came of full age and the Justices very much doubted whether the Action did abate A Guardian Recovered a debt on an Obligation made to an Infant the Defendant paid the Principal and Costs and prayed that the Guardian might be ordered to acknowledge satisfaction The Court said That a Guardian or an Infant or Executor may not acknowledge satisfaction for more than they receive and for so much they ordered the Guardian to acknowledge satisfaction And made an Order that no Execution should issue for the residue If an Administration be repealed from one and granted to another which was only durante minori aetate and that other bring the first Administrator to account and after give him a Release yet the Infant at his full age may compell the first Administrator to account to him again and the former account to such second Administrator shall not Bar him for such Administrators Release is not good unless for some such cause as for which it ought to be made It was by the Chief Justice of the Queens Bench demanded of the other Justices there Assembled upon hearing of Causes If one make an Infant his Executor that Releases a Debt due to him as Executor without receiving the summ due which receipt if it be good will be a Devastavit by the Infant of the Goods in his hands whether such Release shall bind the Infant or not It was agreed by them all That such Release is void for an Infant by his own Laches and Folly shall not prejudice himself Yet a Feme Covert Executrix may receive money without her Husband which was due to her Testator and give an Acquittance for the same and if she gives an Acquittance for debt which causes a Devastavit the Release shall be good and the Wife and Husband bound thereby the reason is
as 8 El. 4. 3. And Nichols Justice said That a Personal Action once suspended by the act of the party as here by the act of the Obligee in making the Wife of one of the Obligors his Executrix shall be Extinct for ever otherwise if by the act of Law And it seemed to the Court That by the last clause of the Devise of all his Goods to the Wife after his Debts and Legacies paid the Obligation passed to the Wife And inasmuch as that the duty and debt thereof is a thing in action which by our Law cannot be transferred by a Devise yet it shall enure as a Declaration of the intent of the Obligor that the debt is extinct and the Civil Law allows a Devise of debts due to the Testator to be good And it is averred in the Principal Case That the Debts and Legacies are all paid whereupon Judgement was given Quòd quaerens nihil capiat c. The suggestion was That whereas one was in debt to J. S. in Thirty pound who after by deed of Gift in his life-time conveyed all his Goods and Chattels to A. and after made the Plaintiff and B. his Executors and devised that the Plaintiff should pay out of the Thirty pound which he owed him Ten pound to the Defendant for a Legacy who brought the Plaintiff into the Ecclesiastical Court for the same where by the Law the Thirty pound debt is extinct by making the Plaintiff Executor and shewed that he had Proved the Will c. And per Curiam the Defendant shall have a Consultation forasmuch as the joynt-Executor hath no remedy to recover the Thirty pound against the Plaintiff his Co-Executor nor can have any Action for the same during the Plaintiffs life yet the debt not extinct but remains as Assets to any other Creditor as is 8 E. 4. And by the same reason that one debt shall satisfie another debt it shall satisfie a Legacy also and much the rather in regard the express intent of the Testator was to that purpose having precisely limited the Legacy to be paid out of the debt Quod not a per totam Curiam And Consultation was granted accordingly Yelv. Council for the Plaintiff CHAP. XII The general difference between an Executor and an Administrator and wherein they generally agree THey differ thus viz. An Executor is made either by the Testator or by his own Acts but an Administrator is appointed only by the Judge An Executor may appoint an Executor to the first Testator so cannot an Administrator yet a bare and meer Executor or a naked Executor to whom nothing is bequeathed in the Will made choice of meerly for his care and not at all for his profit cannot bequeath the Testators Goods in his Will by Legacies no more than an Administrator for these Goods are to be imployed only for the behoof of the Testator in which respect such Executor is accountable as well as an Administrator But of the Profits and Fruits which happen and arise of those Goods which belong to any as Executor he may make his Testament though not of the Goods themselves and so also in some cases may an Administrator They agree thus viz. An Administrator is entitled to all the Goods and Chattels of the Intestate as well as an Executor to all the Goods and Chattels that belonged to the Testator they are both alike liable to the payment of Debts and Legacies and they are both accountable These are the most general things wherein they differ and agree Their more particular agreements and disagreements are very many according to their distinct Beings Interests and Offices For which reason the Reader for his fuller satisfaction in this point is referred to his own Observations from the Contents of the several Chapters of this Testamentary Treatise CHAP. XIII Of the Executors Rights exclusively to the Heirs 1. The several divisions and distinctions of such things as come to the Executor and what Chattels are 2. Of such Chattels real living and moveable as accrew to the Executor 3. Of such Chattels real without life and immoveable as go to the Executor 4. Of Chattels personal living and moveable belonging to the Executor 5. Of Chattels personal without life and moveable pertaining to the Executor 6. Several Laws in reference to this subject 1. ALL things that come unto an Executor may be divided into things possessory and actually in the Testator or into things only in action and not actually in him and the things possessory may be divided into Chattels real and immoveable or into Chattels personal and moveable Again the possessory Chattels real may be divided into things living or into things without life Also the personal Chattels or Goods moveable may be divided into things living or things inanimate and without life There are also comprehensive of some of these Chattels principal and Chattels accessory that follow the principal So that Chattels are all possessions of Goods moveable and unmoveable except such as are in the nature of a Free-hold or parcel of it And they are called real or immoveable either because they are such in their own nature or because they appertain to something real by way of dependance as a Box with writings of Land the body of a Ward the fruit of a Tree or the Tree it self upon the Land or because they issue out of things immoveable and of a more real nature as Leases for years at Will Wardships Tenants Estates by Statute Merchant Staple or Elegit and Grants of the next Advowson 2. The Chattels Real Living and Moveable which did accrew to the Executor were such as these viz. Wardship being a real Chattel in respect of a Tenure of Land whereby was intended such Wardship as was by Knights Service and not such as is by Socage Tenure also a Villain for years as by Grant for a Term from him that had the Inheritance 3. The Chattels Real without Life and Immoveable that go to the Executors are generally and for the most part in Houses or Lands by Lease or extent upon Judgements Statutes or Recognizances or in things issuing out of Houses or Lands as Rents Commons and the like as arrerages of Rent behind at the Testators death also Advowsons Tithes Fairs Markets Profits of Leets and the like which the Testator had only for years Also the Title accrewed to the Crown upon Attainder of Felony where the party held not of the King viz. the Annum Diem Vastum that is power not only to take the Profits for a year but also to wast and demolish c. is but a Chattel And therefore though granted to one and his Heirs by the King yet shall go to the Executor not to the Heir Also a Lease for years determinable upon lives which is a Chattel and shall go to the Executor As also doth an Extent upon a Statute Likewise if a Termer for years grant his Term by Bequest or otherwise to A. and his Heirs
Executors if they have no further Authority or Interest than only to sell the Land and distribute the money for then the Frank-Tenement doth descend to the Heir and the Executors are bound to perform the Devise in convenient time But if the money for the same be to be distributed in pios usus then the Frank-Tenement is in the Executors after the death of the Testator and not in the Heir So that in such Case he may not Enter as in the former Yea if Lands Devised to be sold be not accordingly so done by the Executors the Law will then enforce them to sell the Lands so soon as they can because the mean Profits in that Case taken before Sale are not Assets to charge the Executors as compellable to pay debts of the same But if a man Devise that his Executors shall sell his Land there they may sell it at any time for that they have but a bare and naked Power and no Profit 4. If many Executors be named in a Will wherein Power is given to them to sell Land for any purpose and some of these Executors refuse the Executorship In this Case the other Executors who stand to the Will may dispose and sell the Land without the consent of the other who so refused the Executorship But Note That an Executors Executor cannot sell the Land of the first Testator who by his Will gave Power to his Executor to sell the same unless there be a Co-Executor surviving 5. Although the surviving Executor may sell the Land which a Testator doth bequeath to his Executors to be Sold because as the State so the Trust shall survive yet in case the Executors in that part of the Will impowering them to Sell be particularly Named each by his particular Name and one of them refuse and dye before Sale made then the Survivors cannot sell the same because the words of the Testator one of the Executors refusing or being dead cannot be satisfied unless the Testator express in his Will a Power to the Survivors or Survivor of them or to such or so many of them as take upon them the Probate of the Will without which words the Executors being particularly Named it is otherwise But if the Land to be Sold be left to his Executors generally not particularizing their Names then Sale made by some of them only in this Case is good for that now by the Statute of 21 H. 8. cap. 4. it is Provided That where Lands be Willed to be sold by Executors though part of them refuse yet the residue may sell But here Note That they may not sell to him that so refused because he is yet a party and privy to the Last Will and remains an Executor still so long as any Co-Executor lives For it was the Opinion of the c. Note that by the Opinion of the Justices if a man makes his Last Will and Wills that his Executors shall sell his Land and Devises his Land to his Executors to be sold and one of the Executors refuse the Administration of the Testators Goods before the Ordinary the other Executors cannot sell the said Land to the Executor so refusing the Administration by the Statute 21 H. 8. cap. 4. For that Executor notwithstanding such his refusal is still a party and privy to the said Testament and is one of the Executors at his pleasure It was adjudged in B. R. between Vincent and Lee where a man devised That his Sons in Law should sell the Reversion of his Land without mentioning their particular Names if some of them dye that the others may sell Upon a special Verdict the Case was A man seised of Lands in Possession and of other Lands in Reversion upon an Estate for life Deviseth by his Will in writing That his Executors should have all his Lands Free and Customary in D. for Ten Years to perform his Will and the Will of his Father with the Profits thereof and that after the Ten Years his Executors or any of them should sell it for the payment of his Debts He makes Three Executors and dies The one dies the Ten Years expire Tenant for Life dies the Two surviving Executors sell the Land c. Spurling This Sale is not good 1. The Reversion of the Estate for Life passed not because he had other Lands there to satisfie the words and it was not his intent to pass it because there were not any Profits to be taken thereby 2. The Sale by the Two surviving Executors is not good for it ought to have been by all or by one of them only But the Court resolved to the contrary in both wherefore it was adjudged accordingly The same Case is Reported by Anderson thus viz. J. T. brought Ejectione Firmae against J. W. and others The Defendants pleaded Non Culp whereupon Special Verdict was given the which in effect was That one Smith being seised of Twenty Acres of Land made a Lease thereof to one for Life and being also seised of Sixty other Acres made his Will in manner following viz. I Will and Charge my Executors and every of them to fulfill my Fathers Will and this my Last Will in which were divers Legacies In Consideration whereof I give all my Lands and Tenements to my Executors and they to take the Profits thereof by the space of Ten Years and those Ten Years ended I will the same to be sold by my said Executors or by one of them And made Three Executors and died after the Tenant for life died one of the Executors died also The Two Executors Enter on the Sixty Acres and receive the Profits thereof for Ten Years but Entered not on the Twenty Acres but after the Ten Years ended the surviving Executors sold the Twenty Acres to J. H. who Entered and Leased the same whereon the Action is brought It was said That the Executors did not Sell but it was adjudged that the surviving Executors might Sell For it appeared that the Intention of the Testator was That the Land should be sold for the performance of his Will which the surviving Executors might Execute and consequently do what the Testator appointed in order thereunto CHAP. XXVIII Of Debts Legacies and Mortuaries and the Executors method in the payment thereof 1. Debts to be paid before Legacies 2. The Executor may pay himself first 3. What Debts to the Crown shall have priority of payment before Debts to the Subject 4. Judgements upon Record to be satisfied next after the Debts due to the Crown 5. Next after Judgements upon Record Debts by Statutes or Recognizances are payable before meer Personal Debts 6. After Statutes and Recognizances Debts due by Obligations or penal or single Bills are to have the next precedency in payment 7. Debts upon Specialties Bonds and Bills are to be satisfied before Debts upon a simple Contract 8. After Obligations Debts due upon simple Bills Merchants Books and other Specialties are
are to be sued for in that Court only yet the Ordinary cannot take Cognizance of Freehold devised And whereas it is said That the Devisee may not take the Legacy and serve himself but that it must be Delivered to him by the Executor yet the Law is otherwise in Case Lands or any Rents or other Profit to be taken out of Lands be Devised to a Man in Fee-simple Fee-tayle for Life or Years for in these Cases the Devisee may enter into and take the thing Devised without the Executors leave for so doing CHAP. II. Of Devisors and Devisees or Legataries 1. Who may be a Devisor or Devisee or Legatary 2. What persons are incapable of being Legataries 3. Whether an Infant in the Womb may be a Legatary or a Feme Covert to her own Husband 4. Whether Bastards may be Legataries 1. REgularly every one that is qualified to make a Testament may make a Devise of the same thing whereof he may make such Testament and whosoever is disabled to the one is disabled to the other also And therefore Infants under the age of 21. years may not be Devisors of Land nor of Goods under the age of 14. as to the Male or under the age of 12. Years as to the Female Nor may a Woman under Covert Baron Devise her Lands to her own Husband or to others with or without his Consent Nor may any Ecclesiastical person or Member of a Body Corporate Devise the Lands or Goods which they have in right of the Church or Corporation So that every Devisor ought to be a person qualified to devise and that both in respect of his Person and the thing Devised he must also have at the same time Animum Testandi and the thing Devised must be such as is Devisable And as to the Devisee or Legatary all such by the Civil Law as are uncapable of Inheritances and Goods are excluded from being Legataries or Devisees and indeed from being Executors But every one by that Law that may be made an Heir or Executor may also be a Legatary or Devisee and as to any others no Devise may be made Yet with this Difference that the Executor must be a Person capable both when the Testament is made and when the Testator dyes But it is sufficient for the Legatary that he be capable at the Testators death Indeed at the Common Law it is otherwise for there a Devise or Legacy may be given to all persons to whom a Grant may be made save in some few Cases And the Devise ought to be good and sufficient in Law at the time of the Testators death Therefore if a Man Devise Lands to an Hospital or the like when there is none such at the Testators death though afterwards made or erected such Devise is Null and Void The Reason is Because Devises at Common Law are Purchases and he that taketh Lands by Purchase must be capable to take the same when it falleth to him by the Purchase Thus by the Common Law the Devisee ought to be capable at the time of the death of the Devisor which holds also True by the Civil Law Hence it is that though a Man may not grant nor give Lands to his Wife during the Coverture because they both are but one Person in Law yet by Custom heretofore he might and by Statute now he may Devise his Lands to his Wife to have in Fee-simple or otherwise because such Devise taketh not effect till the death of the Devisor and then they are not one person So then Regularly whosoever may be a Grantee may also be a Devisee or Legatee 2. For which Reason a Cominalty not Incorporate by the Kings Charter to Purchase Lands is Incapable therefore if a Man Devise Lands Devisable in Fee to A. for Life upon a certain Condition the Remainder to certain Men of a Fraternity upon the same Condition not Incorporate by the Kings Charter and enabled to Purchase this Remainder is void Therefore a Legacy given to an unlawful Colledge is void for by that is meant all Companies Societies Fraternities and other Assemblies not so Constituted by the Prince and therefore incapable of being Legataries But generally a Devise may be good to any Person or Persons not specially rendred incapable by Law for by the Civil and Ecclesiastical Law the Legacy is void if it be given to an Heretick Apostate Traytor Felon Persons Excommunicate outlawed Persons Bastard unlawful Colledge as aforesaid Libeller ler Sodomite Manifest and Notorious Usurer except in some special Cases And yet it seems that a Devise of Lands to any such Persons is good within the Statute of Wills Likewise an uncertain Person can be no Competent Legatary no more then he is of being an Executor insomuch that if a Man Bequeath any thing to a person by a certain Name without other description of his person and there be more then one of the same Name known To the Testator in this Case neither of them shall be Legatary by Reason of the uncertainty Hence it is that Devises made in these words viz. To his best Friend or to his best Friends are void Devises Or to his Son A. B when he hath two Sons of the same Name unless you can help it by an Averment which Son the Testator meant but persons named Alternatively or Disjunctively are not so uncertain but may be admitted as Legataries And therefore if the Testator Bequeath 10 l. to A. or B. or to such or such a person both of them shall have the Legacy equally betwixt them Because this word Or is in favour of Testaments taken for and when it is so placed between two persons either as to the appointing of Executors or to the making of Legataries unless it can be well proved That the Testator did bear more affection to the one then to the other Or that he gave Authority to some other person of making the Election which of the two should be the Legatary Or when one of the persons is Incapable of being a Legatary for any of the Reasons aforesaid And if the Devisor doth Bequeath to his Brother or his Children such a thing saying I give to my Brother or his Children in this Case upon the presumption of Affection the Brother shall enjoy the Legacy during his life and after him the Children shall be the Legataries But if it be Devised to him and his Children then are both the Parent and his Children equal and Joynt-Legataries And whereas it is formerly hinted That an Heretick may not be a Legatary or Devisee understand it of an Heretick that is such at the time of the Devisors death for it doth not prejudice the Legatary that fie was an Heretick at the time of the making of the Testament so as he be not one at the Testators death Add nnto this Anabaptists for the Law Civil and Canon excludes them
in the Womb at the Testators death seems to be void Yet if a Man Devise to such an Infant and he happen to be Born before the Testators death it seems that in this case the Devise is good Again A Devise made to a person altogether uncertain and not certainly Named or Described is altogether void yet a plain Description of a Person without naming him is sufficient so that a Devise made to the Dean of Pauls without naming him is good A Man Deviseth his Land to Elianor the Daughter of I. S. who hath divers Daughters whereof one is named Hellen and none Eleanor This is a good Devise to Hellen. Likewise if a Man hath Two Wives and he Deviseth his Land to his latter Wife in Fee the first Wife shall have it or if he hath Two Sons called John and one of them is a Bastard born before Marriage and he makes a Devise to his Son John the Legitimate John shall have it and not the Bastard The Husband can be no Devisee as to a Devise of Lands from his Wife There are Three Brothers by the same Father and Mother and the middle Brother Seized of Land Deviseable giveth it by his Testament Propinquiori fratri suo it seems that neither of them shall have it Suppose a Man who hath a Term Deviseth the Land to one and his Heirs the Devisee dyeth leaving Executors his Heirs shall have the Land and not his Executors the Law is otherwise in case the Entire Term were so Devised A Devise of Land made to the Canons of a certain Cathedral for ever or Canonicis Ecclesiae D. Pauli Lond. in perpetuum is a good Devise to all the Canons joyntly in Fee and the Survivor shall have the Entierty If a Man willeth that his Executors shall Sell his Land for the Payment of his Debts and they all die save one who maketh the Sale in this case the Vendee shall not have the Land the Law were otherwise if the Land had been Devised to the Executors to be Sold. If a Man hath Issue a Son and Land is Devised to the Father Habend sibi Hered de Corpore suo Legitime procreand and after the Devisee hath Issue another Son the second shall have the Land If a Man Deviseth by the Will That after the death of his Wife the Land Devisable shall go to I. S. his Wife shall have it for her Life by this Devise Or if a Man willeth that after 20. Years after the death of the Devisor I. S shall have the Land in Fee the Heir of the Devisor shall have the Land during the Term and not the Executor 5 A Testament Nuncupative is not good for a Devise of Land nor a Testament made in Print if it were never written yet a Testament written though no Executor be named therein is good for Lands but not for Goods Likewise a Testament without Sealing or Subscribing is good enough for a Devise of Land so as it be put into Writing in the Testators Life Time although it be never proved before the Ordinary But if in a Testament there are these words viz. Haec est voluntas intentio mea A. B. c. This is not good for the disposition or devise of Land without saying ultima voluntas according to the Lord Dyers Opinion who in his Learned Readings on the Stat. of Wills 32. and 38. H. 8. if he were indeed the Author of that Impression 1648. doth further Affirm That if a Man makes a Testament of his Land in one County and long after makes a Testament of his Land in another County These are good Also that if Two Men severally Seized of Lands make a Joynt-Testament of their Land This shall be good and several Testaments Also that where a man is in making his Testament and having Devised a parcel of his Land dies before the perfection and finishing thereof This shall be good for so much as is Devised That a Man willing by his Testament that his Lands shall be Sold to pay his Debts not declaring by whom This is a good Will and shall be performed by his Executors or Administrators That a Man making a Will of Land in which he hath nothing and after Purchaseth the same Land and dyeth This is not good That a Woman Covert making a Will of her Land and after taking a Husband who hath Issue the Husband dyeth the Wife dyeth this is not a good Will That if a Man make a Will of his Land and after alien this Land in Fee and after repurchaseth the same Land This is not a good Will That a Man making a Will and after making a new Will and after on his Death-bed saith That the first Will shall be his last Will This is good Also that where a Man giveth Land by his Will in Fee and after by another Will giveth the same Land to another but for Term of Life This is a Revocation of the Entire first Will. Also if a Man Devise another Mans Land This Devise is void but if he after the Devise made Purchase this Land then the Devise is good CHAP VIII Certain Cases touching Devises of Land Void or not 1. Lands What and how Devisable 2. Certain void Devises of Land 3. To what Persons and in what Cases Devises of Land may be good or not 4. The same Lands twice Devised to several Persons in the same Will how both Devises may stand good 5. The Profits of Land Devised do pass the Land it self in which Case Testaments more favourably construed then Deeds 6. How Lands Purchased after a Devise of Lands made may pass by that Devise or not 7. Several Cases in Law referring to this Subject 1. ALthough Lands made Devisable by Statute cannot be Devised otherwise then by Will in Writing yet Lands and Tenements Devisable by Custom may be Devised by a Nuncupative Will without any Writing But Copy-hold Land is not Devisable nor can Tenants in Tail or pur auter vie or Joynt-Tenants Devise their Eestate in the Land they so hold no more then they could before the making of the said Statute which doth not impower them thereunto But such as are Seized of Land in Common or Coparcenary may devise the same And if there be Two joynt-Joynt-Tenants for Life and the Fee-simple to one of them he that hath the Fee-simple may Devise his Fee-simple after the death of the other Joynt-Tenant for Life And in such places where Lands were Devisable by Custom before the making of the Stat. of 32. H. 8. a Devise of Lands may be good against the Heir for the whole but by the Stat. impowering to dispose of Lands by Will a Devise of Land is not good against the Heir save only for Two parts in Three 2. He that Deviseth Land ought to have a Right to and possession of the Land he Deviseth otherwise the Devise is not good and therefore if
Wife came and demanded the 20 l. and none ready to pay it Whereupon the Husband and Wife brought a Writ of Devise and Recovered In this Case it was Resolved were the 20 l. Rent or a Sum in gross That by the bringing of the Writ of Dower the Wife of the Devisor had lost all the benefit which was to come to her by the Devise because the said Rent was Devised to her in Recompence of her Dower so that it was not the meaning of the Devisor that the Wife should have both In the Time of Queen Mary Benloes Serjeant moved this Case A Man Seized of Lands and Tenements in London devised them by these Words viz. I Will and bequeath unto my Wife A. my livelihood in London for Term of her Life and that by this Will the Lands in London pass to the Wife by this Word Livelihood Note for Brook Justice said That it was in ancient Time used so in divers places of this Realm and had been taken for an Inheritance Unto which Dyer also agreed A. having Two Sons by Two Wives devised his Land to I. his Eldest Son and his Heirs after the death of his Wife to whom he devised them for her Life The Question was Whether the Son should take them by Devise as a Purchasor or as Heir at Common Law by descent The Court held that the Devise was void and that it was not in the power of the Son to make Election to take by descent or by Purchase but he must of necessity take the Land as the Law directs which is by descent And it is against a Maxime of Law to give a Thing to such a person to whom the Law gives it if it had not been given A Man made his Will in these Words viz. I give and Bequeath one half of my Lands to my Wife and after her death I give all my Lands to the Heirs Males of any of my Sons or next of Kin. In this Case it was held That the Devise was void because of uncertainty and the words being in the disjunctive and we ought not to frame a Sense upon the Words of a Will where we cannot find out the Testators meaning Likewise it hath been adjudged That Lands devised to a Mans Issue was uncertain and therefore such Devise void If a Man hath in his Occupation several Farms together and then doth Devise one of the Farms called D. and all the Lands to the same belonging the other Farms shall not pass with it although they be occupied altogether If a Man doth Will and Devise That A. and B. his Feoffees shall stand Seised and be Seised to the use of I. S. for his Life the Remainder over c. when in Truth he hath no Feoffees It is a good Devise to I. S. by reason of the Intention Or if a Man make a Feofment to his own use and afterwards Devise That his Feoffees shall be Seised to the use of his Daughter A. who in Truth is a Bastard it is a good Devise of the Lands by Intention Three Brothers are of one Father and Mother the middle Brother Seised of Land Devisable giveth this by his Testament Propinquiori fratrisuo It seemeth that none of them shall have it Note it was held by the Justices That if a Man Seised in Fee of a Mannor and Lands Deviseth the same by his Will to his Son and afterwards in another part of the same Will deviseth a Third part of the same Lands to another of his Sons That they are joynt-Joynt-Tenants of the Lands And so if a Man in one part of his Will deviseth his Lands to A. in Fee and afterwards by another Clause in the same Will he deviseth the same Lands to another in Fee they are joynt-Joynt-Tenants Between B. and P. the Case was this I. W. being Seised of the Mannors of W. and C. in Socage made his Testament devised the Two Mannors in Form following viz. The Mannor of W. to the Eldest Son of R. F. his Cousin and his Heirs and further he devised the other Mannor to M. W. during her life and if she dies and then any of my Cousin F's Sons Living then I will my said Mannor of C. to him that shall have my Manner of W. R. F. had Two Sons G. and I. G. enters on the Mannor of W. and the said M. enters on the other Mannor After G. dies without Issue I. enters on the Mannor of W. and alienates the Fee thereof Afterwards M. dies I living The Question was Whether I. ought to have the M. of C. or not The Court agreed That he could not have it for that he was not such Person as was named or limited to take by the Will for that he had not the Mannor of W. at the Time of the decease of M. and therefore not the Person intended by the Will The Case was That R. P. Seised of divers Lands in A. and having Issue Four Daughters B. I. F. M. made his Will 27. Eliz. in Writing and thereby all his Land in A. he devised to B. and I. his Daughters and made them his Executrices and after in 33. Eliz. Purchased other Lands in A. which are the Lands in Question and after one I. S. came to the Devisor and desired that he would Sell unto him those Lands which he lately Purchased And he said No they shall go with my other Lands in A. to my Executrices Afterwards in 34. Eliz. he fell Sick the Will was read unto him and he said nothing thereto but then gave divers Legacies of Goods to others and caused them to be written and annexed in a Codicil thereto and dyed Whether these Lands newly Purchased shall pass to the Executrices by that Will was the Question viz. Whether by those words used to a Stranger or the annexing of a Codicil to the Will being only concerning Goods be as a new Publication of his Will to make these Lands to pass c. First It was agreed by the Council on both sides and by the Justices That if the Devisor after the Purchase of that Land had made new Publication of his Will and shewed his Intent that those Lands should pass it had been a good Devise of them For the Words in the Will are all his Lands in A. which are apt enough and sufficient to carry them and he could not have added more apt words thereto But afterwards all the Justices Gawdy absente held that it is a new Publication of his Will and sufficient by the words to I. S. For that shews his intent sufficiently and the Will writ hath words sufficient And Fenner held That the annexing of the Codicil thereto is a new Publication as to it For therein he Affirmed That it should be his Will at that Time But the other Justices doubted thereof because he doth not shew thereby any intent That this Will should be for his Purchased Lands nor that he then
Rent where none is in arrear and after Deviseth his Reversion this Devise is not good 3. A Man possessed of a Term for 40. Years Devised that his Eldest Daughter should have the same to her and the Heirs of her Body the Remainder if she dyed without Issue Within the Term to C. his second Daughter in Tail The Eldest Daughter took Husband and dyed within the Term without Issue Her Husband Sold the Term. It was the Opinion of the Court That his Sale thereof was good and that the younger Daughter had no Remedy for it because it was a void Remainder being of a Term which was a Chattel-real and so is to go to the Husband 4. A Lease was made to A. for 41. Years if he should so long live and if he dyed within the said Term that then his Wife should have it for the Residue of the said Years It was held That the limitation to the Wife in Remainder was void for that the Term ended by the death of A. and then there was no Residue to remain to his Wife 5. A Man possessed of certain Goods Devised them by his Will to his Wife for life and after her decease to I. S. and dyed I. S. in the life time of the Wife did Commence Suit in a Court of Equity there to secure his Interest in Remainder A Prohibition was granted in this Case and the Reason was because a Devise in Remainder of Goods was void and therefore no Remedy in Equity for Equitas sequitur Legem It was agreed That a Devise of the Use and Occupation of Lands is a Devise of the Land it self but not so of Goods for one may have the Occupation of them and another the Interest in them 6. Suppose a Man Deviseth a Reversion depending upon an Estate for life to the Parson of D. and to his Successors if the Parson die and after a new Parson be made and the particular Tenant die also the new Parson shall have it Also if a Man Devise Land to one for Term of life the Remainder over in Fee and the Devisee for life refuse yet he in the Remainder may enter but if the Will were That the Executors shall make a Lease for life the Remainder over in Fee and they offer to make a Lease accordingly and the Lessee refuseth he in the Remainder shall not have the Remainder 7. I. S. hath issue Two Sons and dyeth the Elder hath Issue a Daughter who hath Issue a Son and dyeth Land is given by Testament to one for life the Remainder to the next Male of the Body of I. S. begotten the second Son of I. S. shall have the Land and not the Son of the Daughter It would be otherwise if the Remainder were so Entail'd by Deed. 8. If Land be Devised to one for life the Remainder to the Church of D. the Parson of the said Church shall have it And if a Man willeth that after 20. years after the death of the Devisor I. S. shall have the Land in Fee the Heir of the Devisor shall have the Land during the Term and not the Executor 9. A Man Deviseth his Land to his Daughter and Heir being a Feme Covert and to the Heirs of the Woman the Reversion over in Fee and dyeth the Husband refuseth to take by the Devise he in the Remainder entereth he shall retain the Land during the lives of the Husband and Wife but after their decease he Issue of the Wife may enter upon him 10. A Man Seised of Land in Fee hath Issue Two Sons and a Daughter the Father Deviseth the Land to his Wife for Term of life the Remainder propinquioribus de sanguine puerorum of the Devisor the Daughter hath Issue and dyeth the Issue of the Daughter shall have this Remainder and although that the Sons have Issue after yet their Issue shall not have it 11. A Man hath a Term of a Hundred Years to come and he Deviseth this to one for Term of life the Remainder over to I. S. this is a void Remainder it were otherwise if the Devise were that the Devisee shall have the Occupation of the Land during his life the Remainder over 12. A Lease is made for life the Remainder over in Fee reserving Rent by Indenture and for default of Payment that it shall be Lawful for the Lessor to enter and detain during the life of the Lessee he Re-enters for the Rent Arrear he in the Remainder Deviseth the Remainder such Devise of the Remainder is void 13. If Land be given to Two Persons Habendum to the one for life and after his decease to the other in Fee he that hath the Fee may Devise his Reversion thereof Likewise if Land be given to one for life and that after his death it shall descend to I. S. in Fee he may Devise this Remainder Or if a Lease be made dummodo solverit 10 l. to the Lessor for his life he may Devise the Reversion with the Rent Or if a Lease be made to an Infant or Feme-sole for life the Remainder in Fee and the Infant at his full Age or the Feme after Coverture disagree he in Remainder may Devise his Remainder 14. If the Fee-simple of Land be Devised to one the Remainder cannot be Devised to another albeit the first Devise be but Conditional And therefore if a Man Devise his Land to A. B. in Fee so that he pay 100 l. to C. D. And if he fail that then it shall remain to G. D. and his Heirs this Remainder to C. D. is void for upon the Failure of Payment by A. B. the said C. D. may not enter and have the Land but the Devisors next Heir Likewise if Land be Devised to F. G. and his Heirs and if he die without Heirs that then it shall remain to I. M. and his Heirs this is a void remainder 15. A Man may Devise a Term of Years by way of Remainder and the first Devisee cannot hinder the second of the Remnant of the Term. But yet a Man possessed of a Term of Years cannot Entail it by his Will And therefore if a Man Devise his Term to A. B. and his Heirs or to him and the Heirs of his Body or to him and his Issue the Remainder to B. C. this Remainder is void and the Devise is good for the whole Term of Years to A. B. and his Executors 16. A Man Seised of Two Acres in several Towns in one County that is of the one for life and of the other in Fee and maketh a Feofment by Deed of all his Lands in the same County and makes Livery in the Acre in Fee in the name of both the Lessor notwithstanding this may Devise the Reversion of the Acre for life 17. If a Man grants a Rent-charge out of Lands devisable to one for life the Remainder over to the Grantor and his
in Case of Lands Conditionally devised to one and his Heirs for ever or for life the Heir of the Devisor shall keep the Land till the contingent Condition happen to take effect 2. If one Devise Land of the value of 100 l. per annum to A. for life the Remainder to B. paying 50 l. to C. by this Devise B. shall have the Fee-simple of the Remainder upon Condition 3. If one Devise his Land to his Wife for her life and if she live till his Son come to the Age of 25. Years that then he shall have the Land and if she die before he comes to that Age that then A. B. shall have it till his Son come to that Age. A. B. dies before the Wife and after she dies before the Son comes to the Age of 25. Years In this Case the Executors of A. B. shall not have the Land till the Son comes to the Age of 25. Years 4. A. Seised of Lands in Fee had Issue Six Sons and one Daughter and Devised the said Lands to I. S. for 90. Years if the said I. S. and G. his Wife or any of them should so long live the Remainder to P. his Eldest Son and the Heirs Male of his Body the Remainder to these other Sons the Remainder to his Daughter Provided that if the said P. his Son or any of the Sons of the said Devisor or any of the Heirs Males of their Body should endeavour by any Act to Alien Bargain or Discontinue then after such Attempt or Endeavour and before any such Bargain Sale c. were Executed that the Estate of such person attempting c. should cease as if he were naturally dead and that then the Premises should descend remain and come to such person to whom the same ought to come remain and be by the intent and meaning of his Will and dyed P. Levyed a Fine of the Lands he in the next Remainder entered and claimed the Reversion by force of the Devise It was Adjudged in this Case That the Conuzee had the Reversion in him and might maintain an Action of wast because the Proviso of Restraint in the Will of A. was void and repugnant to Law and a Proviso Condition or Limitation ought to defeat the whole Estate and it cannot continue it for part and defeat it for the Residue 5. A Copy-holder of Lands in Borough-English having Three Sons and one Daughter Deviseth his Lands to his Eldest Son paying to his Daughter and every one of his other Sons Five Pounds within Two Years and surrendred to the use of his Will The Eldest Son was admitted and did not pay the Five Pounds within Two Years In this Case it was Resolved 1 That although the yearly Profits of the Lands for Two Year did exceed the Money to be paid yet the Eldest Son had a Fee-simple 2 Although this word Paying in the Case of a Will makes a Condition yet in this Case the Law shall Construe this unapt word Paying a Limitation For if it should be a Condition the same should descend to the Eldest Son and then it should be at his pleasure whether the Daughter or Brothers should be paid or not and therefore in this Case the Law should judg the same a Limitation of which the youngest Son should take advantage 6. A Man Devised Lands to his Wife upon Condition that she should bring up his Son at School c. and that after the death of his Wife the Land should remain to his second Son in Fee and dyed The Wife entered the Condition was broken the Eldest Son after his full Age entered for the Condition broken in this Case it was held 1 That a Condition might be annexed to a will by the Stat. of 32. H. 8. of Wills which gives liberty to a Man to Devise for the advancement of his Wife c. That a particular Estate may be upon Condition though the Remainder be without Condition 3 That he in the Remainder should not take advantage of the Condition but the Heir because he is prejudiced in the Inheritance by the Devise 7. If a Man make Two Men his Executors Proviso that one of them shall not Administer his Goods the Proviso is void because it restrains the Authority which was given by the first part of the will and agrees not with the Law for by Law every Executor may Administer the Goods And such was the Opinion of Baldwin and Egglesfield But Fitzh conceived the Proviso to be good for that he might bring an Action although he did not Administer 8. A Man Seised of Tenements in London Devised the same to Two Persons upon Condition that they should pay to his Wife 10 l. per annum issuing out of the said Tenements at Two Feasts and if the Rent be behind by the space of Six Weeks being demanded that it should be lawful for the Wife to distrain It was held a good Condition and that if the Rent be behind yet the Wife cannot distrain before a demand of the Rent but the Heir of the Husband might enter for the condition broken though the Wife did not demand the Rent A Man Devised his Land to his Younger Son when he should accomplish the Age of 24. Years upon Condition that he should pay 20 l. to the Daughter of the Devisor and if he shall die before the Age of 24. Years then his Eldest Son shall have the Land upon Condition that he pay the said 20 l. and if both his Sons failed that the Land should remain to his Daughter and dyed The Younger Son entered after 24. Years of Age and did not pay the 20 l. to the Daughter the Eldest Brother entered upon him It was Resolved by the Court in this Case That the same was a Limitation and not a Condition and therefore the entry of the Elder Brother was not lawful 10. A Man made a Lease for Years upon Condition That if the Lessee shall Demise the Premises or any part of it other than for one Year to any person or persons then the Lessor and his Heirs to re-enter the Lessee afterwards Devised it by his Will to his Son It was held by the Court That it was a breach of the Condition 11. If Lands be Devised upon Condition of superstitious Uses as to find a Chaplain to say Mass or the like superstitious Uses mentioned in the Will the Remainder over for the like Uses and if they in Remainder perform not the Condition then to forfeit their Estate and the Lands to remain to the right Heirs of the Devisor In this Case it was held That although the Land was Devised but Conditionally to find a Priest to say Mass yet that it was within the Stat. of 1. Ed. 6. Cap. 13. whereby the Lands were vested in the Crown because the said Uses were superstitious Uses to which the Condition of the Devised Lands did refer F. C. Seised of the Mannor of S.
made his Testament in writing and Devised the Mannor to his Wife for the Term of 30. Years in these words viz. For and to these Intents and Purposes following viz. I will and my mind and intent is That B. my Wife shall yearly Content and Pay out of the Issues and Profits of the said Mannor to Sir A. I. and others 30 l. And further Wills That the other Legacies given in his Will should be paid by her and therein Devised divers Legacies And further Willed That his Wife should be bound to Sir A. and others for the performance of his Will F. C. the Devisor dies the Wife enters on the Land c. takes the Profits and thereof pays the Legacies but not to Sir A. and others c. Whereupon the Heir Enters as for breach of Condition It was held by the Justices that it was no Condition but a Declaration of the Testators intention for to what end or purpose should the Wife be bound if it were a Condition But Judgment was not given in the Case for the Parties agreed CHAP. XV. Touching Devises of Rents 1. Rents Issuing out of Lands are as Devisable as the Land it self so as it be the Testators own Land 2. A Grantee may not Devise the Rent which he hath only for another Mans Life 3. Rent to be Issuing out of a Common is not Devisable 4. Several ways how Rents may be Devised 5. The Devise of the Reversion of a Rent upon a false suggestion is a void Devise 1. A Seigniory Rent or the like is Devisable as Land is and will pass without the Atturnment of the Tenant So that a Man may Devise a Rent de novo issuing out of Land or a Rent issuing out of Land that is in esse before And therefore if one make a Lease for Life or Years Rendring Rent the Lessor may Devise this Rent Likewise if a Rent be granted to one and his Heirs the Grantee may Devise this Rent Also a Man that is Seised of Land in Fee may Devise any Rent out of it at his pleasure But a Man cannot Devise a Rent out of another Mans Land that is none of his own nor out of that which he hath not and therefore if one Devise Twenty Pounds to be issuing out of his Mannor of Dale when in Truth he hath no such Mannor that Devise is void 2. If Rent be granted to one Man for the life of another it seems the Grantee may not Devise this Rent but that on failure of other disposal thereof in the Grantees life Time the Terre-tenant shall hold it as an Occupant And if one Devise a Rent of any certain Sum out of his Land to be paid quarterly and say not how long the Rent shall continue this is but an Fstate for life of that Rent 3. If a Man Seised of a Common granteth a Rent out of the Land although that the Land be Devisable yet the Grant is void and by Consequence the Devise 4. If a Tenant for life make a Lease for Years Rendring Rent and after the Tenant for life Surrender to the Lessor all his Right and then the Lessor Devise this Rent this is a good Devise during the life of the Lessee for life Or if a Man make a Lease for life Reserving Rent to him and his Heirs and the Lessor Devise this Rent this also is a good Devise of the Rent otherwise it is if he Reserve the Rent to him and his Assigns Or if a Lessee for Term of Ten Years make a Lease over for Term of 40. Years and the Lessor confirm the Estate Reserving a Rent to him and his Heirs and after by his Will Devise the Rent in Fee this also is a good Devise of the Rent after the Ten Years but not before 5. A Man Seised of a Rent makes a Deed reciting that whereas I. S. holdeth the said Rent of his Grant for Term of life he grants the Reversion of the said Rent after the decease of I. S. to the Grantee and his Heirs in Fee and in Truth I. S. had nothing in the Rent the Grantee Deviseth this Rent this is no good Devise of the Rent If the Husband make a Leafe for life to the Daughter and Heir apparent of his Wife being Covert Rendring Rent and the Wife-Mother die and the Husband Devise the Rent this is a void Devise of that Rent In an Action of the Case upon Trover the Defendant justified and pleaded Rent granted to A. his Executors and Assigns for the life of B. out of Black-acre and shewed that A. was dead and that he as Administrator to A. distrayned for the Rent on Black-acre in Arrears after the death of A. and that he is to have it during the life of B. It was Adjudged That the justification was not good either for matter or manner for that after the death of A. the Rent determined and cannot come to his Executors or Administrators for it was not a Thing Testamentary but a Frank-tenement and nothing in the Grant to A. and his Heirs for the others life If Rent be granted out of Land Devisable by Custom the Rent may be Devised within the Custom for it is of the same nature with the Land CHAP. XVI Of Devises touching the Sale of Land by Executors or others 1. The mean Profits of Lands Devised to be sold are not Assets in the Executors hands unless the Testator shall specially so Appoint it 2. The Heir and not a stranger though appointed in the Devise shall take the advantage of a Breach of Condition annexed to a Devise touching sale of Lands 3. Where the Executors have only an Authority and not an Interest in the Lands Devised to be sold the Heir of the Devisor shall have the mean Profits thereof till it be sold 4. Otherwise where the Executors have an Interest in which case the Money or Proceed upon the sale but not the mean Profits shall be Assets in their hands 5. Several Devises touching sales of Land with or without the Assent of another 6. By the word Appurtenances shall pass in a Devise Lands commonly used with a Messuage 7. A Copy-holders Case of Devise of Land to his Wife 8. Where one who hath but an Estate for life and no Interest to sell may yet have an Authority to Appoint who shall sell the Lands Devised 9. In what Case relating to this matter a Prohibition may Lye or not 10. A Case of Law wherein one Executor alone where there are two can not sell the Land Devised 11. How a sale of Lands Devised to be sold may be void for want of sufficient Authority 12. In what case a Sale of Lands Devised to be sold may be made by one Executor where there are two Appointed by Name 13. Where there is an Interest as well as an Authority and Trust the Executor of the surviving Executor may sell the Lands of the first Testator Devised to be sold 14.
Executors who Refuse to Administer the Goods may yet sell the Testators Lands Devised to be sold 15. Lands Devised to be sold by Executors the one Refusing the other may sell but not to the Refuser 16. A Sale by some only of the Executors is void where there is a special and Joynt-Trust 17. The Difference between an Authority and an Interest in Executors in point of Sale 1. IN all Cases of Devises of Land to Executors to sell the same it is most Prudential to make it as clear and certain as may be that is That the Executors or the Survivor of them or such or so many of them as take upon them the Probat of the Will if his intent be so shall sell it And it is safer to give only an Authority than an Estate unless his meaning be that they shall take the Profits of the Land until the sale And if he do so then it is Requisite that he Appoint that the mean Profits until the Sale shall be Assets in their hands for otherwise it shall not be so 2. If one Devise Land to others to the intent that with the Profits thereof they shall Educate Children or pay such Sums of Money or the like In this case the Devisees must do accordingly or they may be compelled thereunto And Regularly the Heir and not a Stranger shall take the Advantage of a Breach of a Condition annexed to Devises touching sale of Lands And therefore if one Devise Land to another and his Heirs Provided that he pay 100 l. to A. B. Otherwise that the Land shall remain to C. D. and his Heirs in this case if the Devisee do not pay the Money C. D. shall not take Advantage of it nor have the Land according to the Devise but the Heir of the Devisor shall enter and have it and Eject the Devisee 3. If the Testator intending to have his Land or part thereof sold for the payment of Debts or Legacies doth Devise the same in this manner viz. I will that my Executors or that A. B. and C. my Executors shall sell my Land In this case the Executors have only an Authority and no Interest For which reason the Land in the mean time Descends to the. Heir of the Devisor who shall enjoy the Profits thereof until it be sold In which case also the Executors may sell it when they please unless they be hastned thereto by order of Court And are all to joyn in the Sale Insomuch that if one or more of them dye before the Sale the surviving Executors or the Executors of the deceased Executors may not sell it by this Authority The Case is the same if any of the Executors Refuse the charge of the Will in which Case the rest of the Executors which accept the said charge may not alone sell the Land unless the words in the Will be That his Executors or some of them shall sell it But now by the Stat. of 21. H. 8. cap. 4. Some of them may sell it without the rest in case any of the Executors dye before the Sale 4. But if the Testator Devise the Land in this manner viz. I give my Land to my Executors to be sold c. In this case the Exeeutors have as well an Interest in the Land as an Authority to sell it And therefore it doth not here descend unto the Heir as in the former case but the Executors shall keep it till the Sale and may sell it when they will so as it be within any competent or convenient time for otherwise the Heir may Enter and Eject them by a Condition in Law annexed to the Interest And in this case the mean Profits until the Sale is no Assets but the Money or Proceed upon the Sale shall be Assets in their hands And in this case if before the Sale one or more of the Executors dye or refuse the rest may sell it for the Estate surviveth But it is supposed they may not sell to him that doth refuse the charge of the Will Neither may they in either of these Cases transfer their power of selling to any other nor keep the Land themselves though they pay the value thereof with their own Money 5. If the Devise be that the Executors shall sell with the Assent of A. B. in this case if A. B. dye before he Assent the Executors can not sell and in his life-time they can not sell without his Assent And if one Deviseth that his Lands shall be sold to pay his Debts and say not by whom in this case it shall be sold by his Executors Or if one Devise all his Land except Ten Acres which he doth appoint to pay his Debts by this Devise his Executors or the survivor of them may sell the said Ten Acres But if one say by his Will that A. B. shall have as well the Guardianship and Education of his Children as the disposing letting and setting of his Lands in this case A. B. hath not power to sell the Land Or if one Devise that his Land shall be sold after his Wife's death by his Executors with the Assent of A. B. And make his Wife and another his Executors and dye and after A. B. dye In this case the Land can not be sold for the Authority is determined 6. Suppose a man seised in Fee of a Messuage with which certain Lands have been occupied time out of mind give his Instructions for the making of his Will inter alia declares That his meaning is that his said Messuage and all his Lands in W. shall be sold by his Executors And the party that writes his Will Pens it in this manner viz. I will that my house with all the Appurtenances shall be sold by my Executors the Devisor dyes The Executors sell part of the Lands By this Devise such Sale is good and the Lands do pass for the words with all the Appurtenances are effectual to enforce the Devise and extend to all the Lands specially because the Devisor gave Instructions accordingly 7. A Copy-holder Deviseth his Land to his Wife for her life and that after his death the Wife or her Executors should sell the Land and Surrendred to the use of his Will which was Entered thus viz. To the use of his Wife for life Secundum formam ultimae voluntatis In this Case she hath an Estate in the Land to her own use for her life and also an Estate in Fee to sell it otherwise the clause secundum formam ultimae voluntatis should be void 8. A man Deviseth by his Will his Lands to his Wife and if she have Issue by the Devisor that his Issue shall have it at his age of 21 years and if the Issue dye before that age or before his Wife or if she have no Issue that then she shall choose two Atturneys and she to make a Bill of Sale of any Lands to her best Advantage In
Condition of Marriage with the Advice of another obliges the Legatary to ask such Advice if he will have the Legacy but doth not oblige him to follow it 4. If a Legatary be Married when a Legacy is given him on Condition of Marriage it is Material to see whether the Testator knew so much or not 5. A Condition against Marriage is void and the Legacy will be good notwithstanding 6. If there be given to one if he shall not Marry a Legacy when he dyes he shall have it presently and not wait for it till his death 7. If 200 l. be given to one if she do not Marry and 100 l. if she doth and she after Marryeth What shall the Legatary have 8. What the Wife shall have as to her Legacy if she Marry after her election to the Contrary 9. The Distinction which the Canon Law makes in case of Conditions directly contrary to Marriage 10. If the Husband doth Devise his House to his Wife quamdiu she shall continue a Widdow and she live and dye such it shall accrew by the Civil Law to her and her Heirs for ever 11. A Legacy on a Marriage Condition or made payable at a time to come and the Legatary dye before the time come whether and when due 12. Difference between bequeathing a Legacy to one when he shall be of full age and bequeathing it to him to be paid when he is of full age 13. A Devise made by a Feme sole to him with whom she after Marries is void 14. A Devise of Lands generally made by the Husband to the Wife for life is no Bar to her Joynture otherwise if Devised for her Joynture 15. A Moiety of Goods Devised by the Husband to the Wife is the Moiety of them as they were at his Death if there be Assets enough for his Debts 1. IF a man bequeath 100 l. to A. B. Provided that he Marry with C. D. the Marriage must take effect with C. D. before the Legacy is due to A. B. unless there be an Illegallity or too much Indignity in such Marriage in which case the Condition is void in Law and it shall not prejudice the Legatary 2. If I Bequeath 20 l. to E. F. so as she Marry with the good liking and Consent of A. B. she must Marry otherwise she hath no right to the 20 l. But she is not oblig'd to have the Consent of A. B. therein Yea she shall have the Legacy though she Marry not only without his Consent but also although A. B. be altogether unacquainted therewith or knowing thereof should contradict it unless it be Appointed in the Will expresly That in case she Marry without such Consent the said Legacy of 20 l. shall be and enure to such or such pious uses specially mentioned in the said Will. 3. If I Bequeath 100 l. to A. B. so as she Marry with the Advice of C. D. In this Case A. B. shall not have the said Legacy unless she require or desire the Advice of C. D. Albeit she be not obliged to follow his Advice therein yet she is obliged to ask his Advice or she can not haue the said Legacy The reason of the Difference in this case from the former is That in the former there may be a total impediment to Marriage it self in This it is otherwise But if C. D. be Dead whereby the Condition is rendred impossible In such case it is as if it were performed provided that C. D. were Dead before his Advice could well be ask'd or required 4. If a man Bequeath 100 l. to C. D. in this manner viz. I give and Bequeath 100 l. to C. D. if he shall Marry And C. D. was a Marryed man at that time when the Testament was made In this case it is Resolved That if A. B. the Testator were at the time of making the Testament Ignorant of C. D's being then Marryed the Legacy is instantly due to him upon the Testators death because the Condition in a Legal Construction is actually performed But if the Testator at the time of his making the Testament did infallibly know that C. D. was then Marryed the said Legacy is not due to him until he be Marryed a second time which Distinction ought to fall under Consideration with those who hold That if a Testator Bequeath 100 l. to C. D. towards her Marriage the Legacy may be due to her albeit she were Marryed at that time when the Testament was made 5. If I bequeath 10 l. to one provided she do not Marry it is a void Proviso in Law and she shall have the 10 l. although she do Marry Otherwise it is if the words be Provided she do not Marry at such a time or in such a Place or with such a Person 6. If a man Devise to A. B. in this manner viz. I give unto A. B. if she shall not Marry my Mannor of D. when she dyes In this case A. B. although she Marry shall have the Mannor presently and not expect or wait for it until her death The Reason is because that Time of her death is not joyned with the Legacy but with the Condition as if the Testator had said viz. If A. B. shall remain unmarried to her death 7. Suppose a man doth bequeath 200 l. to A. B. if she do not Marry and 100 if she do Marry and after she Marryeth Some are of Opinion that in this case A. B. shall have 300 l. viz. 100 l. because she is Marryed and 200 l. because the Condition of non-marriage or against Marriage is void Others are of opinion that she can recover but one of the said Legacies and that is the 200 l. 8. Suppose a man bequeath to his Wife the use and occupation of all his Goods if after his decease she shall abide in her Widdowhood But in case she Marry again that then she shall have only 100 l. In this case if at first the Wife's Election be to continue in her Widdowhood she shall accordingly enjoy and have the use and occupation of the said goods But if after that she Marry she shall not have the said 100 l. And some are of Opinion That by such second Marriage she forfeits both the said Legacies because thereby she nulls her precedent Election whereby she was concluded and therefore shall also restore or refund the value of the Interest of such Goods as she used and enjoy'd during her Widdowhood and so it hath been Adjudg'd 9. Although a Condition directly contrary to Marriage annexed to a Legacy in a Will is a void Condition for that very reason yet the Civil or rather the Canon Law doth distinguish in this point between a Virgin and a Widdow and sayes that such Conditions against Marriage as to a Virgin are void but allows them as to Widdows Specially if the Legacy be given by a Husband to his own Wife or by a
Son to his Mother 10. A man bequeaths the House wherein he lives to A. B. his Wife quamdiu she shall continue a Widdow and dyes A. B. doth not Re-marry but lives and dyes a Widdow In this case the said House by the Civil Law comes to A. B. and his Heirs for ever Note that what in the premises hath been said touching the invallidity of Conditions against Marriage annexed to Legacies in relation to Females holds the same in Law touching the like illegal Conditions in reference to Males or Masculines 11. A man Devised to his Daughter 500 l. towards her Marriage In this Case it was the Opinion of the Court That if she die before Marriage her Executors shall have it But if the words were To be paid at the day of her Marriage or at the age of 21 years and she dyeth before both it is otherwise The latter part of which Judgment seems not to agree with the Civil Law in that point which sayes the time of the age of a Legatary may be joyned either to the substance of the Legacy or to the execution and performance of the same if the time of the age of the Legatary be joyned to the substance of the Legacy as when the Testator doth give thee 100 l. when thou shalt be of the age of 21 years In this case if thou dyest before that time thy Executors cannot recover the 100 l. But if the time of the age of the Legatary be joyned only to the execution or performance of the Legacy as when the Testator doth give thee 100 l. which he willeth shall be paid when thou accomplish the age of 21 years In this case although thou dye before thou accomplish the age of 21 years yet thy Executors or Administrators shall recover the same when the time is accomplished wherein thy self if thou hadst been then living mightst have recovered the same 12. Consonant whereunto is that which we find Reported viz. That it was agreed by the Court That if a man Deviseth to his Daughter 100 l. when she shall be Married or to his Son when he shall be of full age and they dye before the time appointed and make Executors their Executors shall not have it But it is otherwise if the Devise were to them to be paid at their full ages and they dye before that time and make Executors there the Executors shall have it Which difference was since likewise so Agreed and Adjudged 13. A Feme Sole Deviseth Lands to A. B. in Fee to whom afterwards she was Married and during the Coverture Countermands her Will saying her Husband should not have the Land nor any other benefit by her Will and dyes In this case the Husband shall not have the Land not only because of her Countermand but because of the disability of a Feme Covert to make a Will which takes no effect till the parties death And therefore if a Feme sole Deviseth Lands to a man and then takes him to Husband and dyes This Inter-marriage is a reversion of the Devise and the Heir of the Woman shall have the Lands and not the Husband because after Marriage the Will of the Wife in Judgment of Law is subject to the Will of her Husband and a Feme Covert hath not any Will for the making of the Will is but the Inception thereof and takes no effect till the death of the Devisor 14. If a man Deviseth Lands generally to his Wife for the Term of her life It cannot be averred to be for the Joynture of the Wife and in satisfaction of her Dower But if a man Deviseth Lands to his Wife for life or in tail for her Joynture and in satisfaction of her Dower the same is a good Joynture within the Stat. of 27 H. 8. 15. A man Devised the Moiety of his Goods to his Wife and dyed It was the opinion of the Court That she should have the Moiety of them as they were at the time of his death if his Executors had Assets sufficient to pay his Debts If a Legacy be given to a Woman Covert and her Husband give a Release and afterwards he and his Wife sue in the Ecclesiastical Court for the Legacy the party sued shall not have a Prohibition upon the Husbands Release because the Temporal Judges cannot meddle with a Legacy nor consequently determine whether the Release will extinguish the same As the Case 29 Eliz. Adjudged The Husband may Devise to his Wife although they are but one person in Law for it takes no effect till after his Death CHAP. XVIII Of Legacies and Devices to a Child in the Womb. 1. A Devise to an Infant in the Womb is good 2. It may be good though the Infant be rip'd alive out of the Womb. 3. It is good though it be a Devise in Remainder or in Tail 4. How the Divident of a Devise shall be in case of Twins unexpected or an Hermophrodite 5. How the Legacy shall be apportioned when bequeathed to any Child in the Womb and more then One or Two happen to be Born 6. Where a Devise void or voidable in his Inception may become good by matter ex post facto 1. THat a Child in the Womb to whom a Legacy is bequeathed or Lands Divised is after his or her Birth though subsequent to the Testators death capable of taking by such Devise is a Truth now not to be controverted though it hath been Contradicted and otherwise Resolved for we find it Reported in a Case thus stated viz. A Man had Issue Five Sons his Wife being with Child with the Sixth at the time of his death and by his last Will declared That the Third Part of his Land should descend and come to his Son and Heir the other Two Parts he bequeathed to his Four Younger Sons by Name and to the Heirs Males of their Bodies and if the Infant in the Mothers Womb be a Son then he to have a Fifth Part as Co-heir with his Four Elder Brothers The Sixth Son was Born after the death of his Father in this Case it was Resolved That the Son Born after the death of the Father should not have any thing because he was uncapable as a Purchasor when the Devise was first to take effect because he was not then in esse or rerum natura Notwithstanding which it was not long after in another Case otherwise understood in which Case it was Admitted That a Devise to an Infant in his Mothers Belly was good It is presumed the intendment is of such an Infant as was born after the Testators death In other Cases also it hath been held That Devise to an Infant in his Mothers Belly is good 2. A Man Deviseth his Land to his Wife being with Child the Remainder to the Issue en ventre safeme his Wife in Travail dyeth and the Son is rip'd from his Mother alive he shall have the said Remainder
3. If one be possessed of a Term of Years of Land and Devise the same to his Wife during all the Term and if she die within the Years of the Term then to A. and B. his Two Sons if they have no Issue Male but if they or either of them have Issue Male then that it shall go the use of those Issues Male the Wife dies and the Two Sons dye without Issue Born one of their Wives being privily with Child of a Son who after his Fathers death is Born In this Case and by this Devise the Issue Male shall have it as soon as he is Born 4. Suppose a Man possessed of an Estate to the value of 721 l. hi Wife being with Child did Devise in this manner viz. Whereas my Wife is with Child I Will that if she be delivered of a Son that then that Son shall have 480 l. 13 s. 4 d. And my Wife shall have 240 l. 6 s. 8 d. But in Case she be delivered of a Daughter then my Will is That that Daughter shall have the 240 l. 6 s. 8 d. and my Wife shall have the 480 l. 13 s. 4 d. and dies It happens That the Wife is after delivered both of a Son and a Daughter The Question is How each Legatary shall be satisfied his and her Legacy according to the Intention of the Testator for by the Will a Legacy is given to each of them It is Resolved That according to the Testators Intention which is the Index of the Testament the Son shall have double to the Wife and the Wife double to the Daughter and consequently the Son shall have 412 l. the Wife 206 l. and the Daughter 103 l. Which in all amounts to 721 l. the full value of the Testators said Estate So that each person is to have a Portion answerable to the Rate of Proportion mentioned in the Will But if the Child which the Mother brings forth be an Hermophrodite then it shall have the Portion due to that Sex whereof the Hermophrodite doth most participate But if that also be doubtful it is to be presumed according to the more worthy Sex viz. the Masculine 5. In Case a Testator saith If my Wife bring forth any Child I give to the same 100 l. and she bring forth Two or Three Children In this Case every Child may obtain a Hundred Pounds if there be Assets sufficient and the Testators Goods will suffice to satisfie the same otherwise there must be a proportionable deduction 6. There is a Case wherein by the Birth of a Child after his Father the Testators death a Devise becomes good to another which otherwise would be void when none is given to himself As thus If one Devise his Land to his Daughter and Heir apparent in Fee-simple this Devise is void yet if in this Case the Wife of the Devisor be privily with Child of a Son which is born after his death now is the Devise become good for now she is not Heir to her Father Q. Mead and Pyriam Justices in the C. B. Affirmed That it had been there Adjudged in the Lord Dyers Time That if Lands are Devised to Two Men and the Child where with the Devisors Wife then goeth that such Devise is good and the Child shall take by such Devise But whether they shall take in Common or Joynt-tenancy the Lord Dyer doubted A. possessed of a Lease for Years Devised the same to his Eldest Son and the Heirs of his Body and if he dyed without Issue then to P. his Younger Son and the Heirs of his Body and for default of such Issue that the Term should remain to his Daughters The Testator dies leaving Two Daughters and afterwards another Daughter is Born The Eldest Son Sells the Term and dies without Issue the Younger Son dies also without Issue the Three Daughters enter and the Term was Adjudged to them Three although the Youngest Daughter was not Born at the Time of the death of the Devisor otherwise if he had named the Two Daughters in the said Devise by their proper Names CHAP. XIX Certain Cases of Devises touching Lands and Chattels-real 1. The difference in Power of Devising between him in Fee and Tenant in Tail for Life 2. What Vses are Devisable 3. Money payable on a Mortgage is Devisable though Devised before the day of Payment 4. Obligations or Chattels-real in right of a Wife as Executrix or not are not Devisable by the Husband 5. A void Presentation is not Devisable in what kind an Advowson in Fee may be 6. Whether Leases and Rents may pass under the Notion of Immoveables as also Bonds and Specialties under the Notion of Moveables 7. What shall pass by a Devise of all Goods Chattels Moveables or Immoveables 8. The difference between an universal Successor and a naked Executor or particular Legatary 9. Devise made under Coverture may be good by new Publication of the Husbands death otherwise not 10. The same Law as to a Devise made by an Infant during Minority disqualified 11. Not full Payment Equivalent to no Payment 12. A Personal Charge incumbent on a Legacy is to be defrayed by the Executor not the Legatary 13. Equity in Election to be Regulated by the Testators Intention 14. Circumstances of a Devise not Restrictive nor joyned to the Devise it self ought not to minorate the same 15. A Devise shall be interpreted to the utmost Consistency with the Devisors words to the best advantage of the Devisee 16. Comprehensive words ought not to be extended beyond what is Rational in Construction of Law 17. The Advantage of a Residuary-Legatary when others refuse 18. Discrepancy among the DD. touching a Legacy to the Poor 19. Accessory Advantages to a Legatary between the making the Testament and the Testators death 20. The Devise of a Thing not in rerum natura at the Testators death is void 21. The Testators Estimation of a Legacy doth not alter the Condition thereof 22. The Executor may not exceed his Testators Estimate to a Legataries prejudice 23. The Devise of a part not expressing what part implyes a Moity 24. Constructions of Law to avoid uncertainty and the Law touching Elections 25. Where a Legacy is given Nomine poenae and failure in the Executor the Legatary may take either but not both Legacy and Penalty 26. Where there happen Two Elections in one Devise the Legatary shall have the first the Executor the second 27. The Law touching a Devise of a House where the Testator had none or many or burnt or ruin'd or pull'd down or demolish'd or re-edified 28. In what Case a Mill joyning to a House shall pass by a Devise of the House or not 29. One Thing ought not to be Compriz'd under the Appellation of another beside the Testators Intention 30. One Stable or one Kitchin to Two Houses shall pass with that Devised House whereto they are most nigh or most Contiguous 31. The Law touching
Fruits of an Orchard or other Lands which at a Rent certain he hath taken to Farm for Seven Years who shall pay the said Rent the Executor or the Legatary It is Answered That the Executor shall pay it because it is a Personal Charge Or if he Devise certain Lands which he had lately bought but the whole purchase-money not paid at the Testators death the Executor and not the Devisee is lyable for the same But the Devise shall not take effect till the same be paid if there be no other Assets wherewith to pay it 13. A Man possessed of Three Fields whereof Two called Rushcrofts the one being of much better value then the other the third called Longlands doth Devise one of his Rushcrofts or Longlands which he will to A. B. and dies In this case A. B. hath his Election whether he will have one of the Rushcrofts or Longlands but if he chuses one of the Rushcrofts it shall be that which is nearest in value to Longlands 14. A Man made his Will and therein Devised to A. B. all the Lands which he had in the Tenure or Occupation of his Tenant C. D. Consisting of Meadow Pasture and Arrable Grounds Scituate about the Farm-house of the said C. D. and dies The Question was Whether other Pasture and Arable Grounds belonging to the Testator in the Tenure or Occupation of the said C. D. and by him Rented of the said A. B. but not Scituate as aforesaid were to be Comprized within this Devise In this Case it was Resolved in the Affirmitive The Reason is because the quality or Circumstance of the Place or Scituation is not here joyned with the Devise for any Restrictions sake but only by way of Demonstration 15. A Man bought certain Lands of A. B. with a Clause or Covenant of Redemption within a certain Time in the Nature of a Mortgage The Time of Redemption being Elapsed the Purchaser made his Will and therein ordered That his Executor should Restore the said Lands to A. B. paying what Costs and Charges the Testator had been at and Expended about the said Lands The Question was Whether the Mortgagor or Vendor now the Legatary or Devisee were in this Case obliged to pay the Redemption-money over and above the said Costs and Charges which the Testator had Expended about the Lands as aforesaid In this Case it is Resolved in the Negative viz. That the Devisee shall have the Land paying only the said Charges and without paying the Redemption-money 16. A. B. by his last Will and Testament makes his Two Sons C D. and D. B. the Joynt-Executors of all his Estate and dies C. B. for a certain Sum of Money Sells his Part or Interest in the said Estate unto D. B. his Brother After D. B. makes his will and therein Devises to the said C. B. all his Interest in the said Estate by his Father and dies The Queston was Whether C. B. by that Devise should have all the said Estate whereof the Two Brothers were made Joynt-Executors by their Father or only so much thereof as accrewed to D. B. by vertue of his Co-executorship In this Case the D. D. are somewhat divided but the prevailing Opinion is That C. B. by this Devise shall have no more then accrewed to D. B. by virtue of his Co-executorship because the other part of the Estate was his by Purchase and not by being Executor to his Father and the Property being altered by the Sale it ceased to be the Fathers Estate or any Estate to D. B. by the Father and became his own proper Estate by Purchase But the Question is put a little further as whether the said Devise shall be made good as the said part was when the Father dyed or as it was at the time of D. B. the Testators death In this it is Agreed That the said Devise shall be considered only as the Estate was at the Time of the death of the Devisor D. B. and not as it was at the Time of the death of his Father 17. A. B. being possessed of several Houses by Lease doth Devise Two of them in his last will and Testament unto C. D. such as he shall chuse or Two of them to C. D. which he will the rest to I. G. In this Case if C. D. refuse to take by this Devise and will chuse neither of the said Houses I. G. shall have them all 18. A. B. makes his Will and thereof C. D. his Son the sole Executor in which Will he appoints that a Fourth part of his Estate shall be given to the Poor in Case C. B. die without Issue C. B. Survives the Testator hath a Son makes his Will and therein Ordains That if his Son should happen to die Intestate and without Issue that then the Contents of A. B. his Fathers Will should be performed and dies leaving Issue a Son After the said Son of C. B. dies Intestate and without Issue In this Case In this Case some are of Opinion That the said Fourth part of A. B. the first Testators Estate is not due to the Poor because that general disposal which C. B. made in his Will ought to be understood only of such Things as might be claimed by the first Will and which could be due only by the same Others conceive That it is due to them in Case there were no other Legacies contained in the Will of A. B. which his Son C. B. was to see performed and discharged 19. If a Man doth Devise Land whereon is no House at the Time when the Testament was made but One is built thereon before the Testator dies in this Case the House as well as the Land shall pass by this Devise Likewise if a Testator Devise a Bond or Debt owving to him by some Goldsmith or Banker the principal whereof hath produced an encrease by the Interest thereof since the time of making the Devise In this Case by the Civil Law the Legatary shall have such Interest in the Bankers Hands as well as the Principal which accrewed by vertue of the Principal during the Testators life after the making of the Testament which by that Law holds true in all Credits producing an Interest or Accessory profit yet it is otherwise even by that Law as to annual Rents payable out of Land for therein the Civil doth agree with the Common Law That the Arrears of such Rents behind at the Testators shall go to the Executor and not to the Legatary to whom the Land is Devised 20. If the Legacy be not in being in rerum natura at the Time of the Testators death then neither the Thing bequeathed nor the value thereof is due to the Legatary but if the Thing Devised is only by any Impediment obstructed from being delivered in kind then the Devisee shall recover the true value thereof 21. If a Testator Devise in these words viz. I give
its Integrals or defective as to its more Noble and more Principal Parts and Members as having but one Eye or but one Hand albeit the Creature hath life the Legacy hath none For although an Amplication of the natural Form in this Case doth no prejudice yet a Mutation thereof will understand not this as if it did extend to Hermophrodites For if they be not in a double Capacity as to Legacies as well as other things yet they are not excluded a single Capacity but in that Case it is provided That that Sex which most prevails with them in Nature shall likewise prevail in Law as to the Legacy Bequeathed 107. To conclude with the Pope because much of the Law that treats of this Subject if I would have travell'd that way borders on his Dominions it is Asserted or Legended which you please by a very learned Author That Nemo praeter Papam potest alterare voluntates Testatorum It is nothing strange that he who assumes a Power to dispose of Souls should alter the best faculty thereof for the Wills Society is the Creatures Felicity 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 FINIS INDEX GENERALIS OR An Alphabetical Table Comprizing all the Material Points of Chiefest Remarque in this Testamentary Abridgment with Reference to each Page and Paragraph A. ACceptance of Executorship in what Cases Compellable by Law p. 91. § 2. Accessorie Advantages to a Legatary between the time of making the Testament and the Testators death p. 291 292. § 19. Accompt Executors Obliged to Accompt with the Ordinaries power therein p. 150. § 1. Within what time they are â—o Accompt Ibid. § 2. Though it be Judicially made yet it shall not Prejudice Absent Creditors or Legataries not being duly Summoned Ibid. § 3. Whether Accompt lies against Executors for Money paid to their Testators by vertue of the Privy Seal p. 113 114. § ult It lyeth against the Executor of an Accomptant for Money received by his Testator although paid by Order frm the Lord Treasurer Ibid. It lyeth not against the Executor of an Accomptant except for the King p. 128 129. § 2. Actions Maintainable by Executors or Administrators p. 100 c. Personall Actions in the Testator are none in the Executor Ibid. § 2. p. 129. § 3. Actions Maintainable against Executors or Administrators p. 105. c. Personall Actions lie not against Executors as such p. 129. § 3. Whether Actions and Right of Actions fall under the Notion of Goods Devised or under the Notion of Moveables and Immoveables p. 306 307. § 1 2. Administration how it shall be granted p. 153. § 5. Whether it may be Granted by Word only Ibid. § 5. p. 163. § ult Whether it may be Granted Conditionally and with an Ita tamen p. 162. In what case it may be Granted notwithstanding an Executorship Ibid. It may be Granted of the Goods of a Woman Covert Intestate Ibid. Two Letters thereof may be Granted and both Good p. 69 70. § 5. What Acts amount to an Administration p. 162. § ult To take in any of the Testators or Intestates Obligations and give others in stead thereof is an Administration and alters the Property Ibid. p. 159. § ult To whom of right it belongs p. 169 c. Granted to an Executor of his own wrong will not Justifie him p. 162. § ult To whom it belongs Durante Minoritate p. 67 68. § 4. When it ceases ibid. Committed Durante Minoriaetate p. 154. § 6. Granted by the Metropolitan where there is not Bona Notabilia is voidable not void otherwise if Granted by a Bishop when it appertains to the Metropolitan p. 167. § ult In what Cases not voidable only but void also p. 159 160. § ult Granted a Caveat depending void p. 171. § 5. Adminstrations Fraudulent and Revokable p. 164 c. Whether to say granted by a Bishop a good Plea without shewing that he was Loci illius Ordinarius And whether so of a Dean or Arch-Deacon p. 155 159 160 161 c. § ult To say Granted by A. W. LL Dr. no good Plea because not shewed to be Bishop or Ordinary p. 161. Administration Durante Minori aetate ceaseth at the Age of 17 Years p. 67. § 2. Administrator What he is in Law p. 151. § 1. His Origination Ibid. § 2. What in a Notion distinct from Executors p. 151. After an Executors death how the Law in that case provides p. 152. § 3. Administrator of an Intestate Executor may not meddle with the first Testators Goods p. 69. § 4. He is an Assigne in Law as well as an Executor p. 161. § ult In what case Acts done by a former Administrator are good notwithstanding Letters of Administration after Granted to another p. 165 166. § 4. In Plea he must shew not only who Granted his Letters of Administration but also that he had Legal power so to do p. 158 159. § ult What sales or disposals of Goods an Administrator may make Durante Minoritate of the Executor p. 156. Administrator pendente Lite of a Citation to Repeal sells Goods good for he hath Lawfull power to Dispose c. Otherwise in an Appeal p. 166. § 5. In what Case an Administrator only in pretence shall be no Legatary in reality p. 318 319. § 26. Advowson in Fee how Devisable p. 288. § 5. Advowson in Gross not Devisable p. 225. § 2. Whether an Advowson may be Assetts p. 122. § 8. Age At what Age Minors may be Devisors p. 205. § 1. Age Superannuated into Dotage Intestable p. 13. § 4. Alien not Denison whether he may be an Administrator p. 170. § 4. Alien Administrator though Enemy may Sue p. 103. § ult Alien not Denizon intestable as to Lands p. 226. § 3. Alienations Prohibited to Devisees with the difference between necessary and voluntary Alienations p. 298. § 48. A Tripartite Case in Point of Alienations prohibited by the Testator p. 248 249. § 49. All How that word is to be understood p. 311. § 14. Anabaptists by the Civil and Canon Law Incapable of being Legataries p. 207. § 2. Animus Testandi Necessary in every Testator in making a Will or Devise p. 2. § 2. p. 202. § 2. Annuity when payable if no fix'd time be set by the Testator p. 306. § 20. p. 439. § 3. p. 444. § 78. Apostates Intestable p. 21. § 4. Incapable of a Legacy p. 206. § 2. Appellation of things ought not to be besides the Testators Intention p. 294. § 29. Appurtenances by that word shall pass Lands commonly used with a Messuage Devised p. 272. § 6. They are not where the one is Freehold the other Coppyhold p. 235. § ult Arbitrament made in writing against a Testator doth not charge his Executor p. 108. § 6. p. 110. § ult Debt thereupon against an Administrator not good p. 109. § ult Assent of an Executor necessary to the having of a Legacy p. 162. § ult Assent to
10. By Devising the Bents § Ibid. By a Generall Implication p 244 § 11. Whether Fee-simple passeth in a Will by the Word Assigns without the Word Forever p. 242. § 5. Fee-simple Devised to one is not Devisable to another by the same Will p. 243. § 9. Fee and not Leases and Leases and not Fee in what Cases and by what words pass by a Devise p. 244. § 12. Fee of Land Devised to one the Rent thereof to another what the Civil Law in that Case p. 295. § 34. The Devise of a House though by the word Fee-simple thereof may pass only an Estate for life p. 255 256. § ult Felo dese Intestable as to Goods and Chattels not so as to his Lands p. 226. § 3. Felons under Attainder are Intestable p. Ibid § 3. They are not Intestable before Conviction p 20 21. § 2. They are Incepable of a Legacy p 206. § 2. The Qualifications thereof Ibid. Feme Covert she may without her Husbands consent make an Executor of those Goods whereof her self is Executrix or which she hath as Executrix p 226. § 3. Yet she cannot Devise them by Will Ibid. Being Executrix and under that Notion receiving Money she may release without her Husband p. 71. § ult Whether she may be a Legatary to her own Husband p 208. § 3. She may not Devise Lands to her own Husband nor unto others either with or without his consent p 205. § 1. 226. § 3. vid. Women Covert Feme Sole her Devise to him whom she after marries is void p 281 282. § 13. Field if Devised the Edifice thereon passeth therewith p. 295. § 33. Fraud or Covin in an Executors Payments shall not prejudice the Creditors p. 147. § 11. Fraudulent Recoveries no Barre to Creditors p 108. § 7. p. 113. § ult Freehold Devised not Cognizable before the Ordinary p 205. § 4. G. Garden passeth by the Devise of a House p 237. in prin Gavelkind Lands Devisable by Custom p 224. § 1. An Estate-Tail thereof Devised p 251. § ult Goods What shall pass by a Devise of all Goods Chattels Moveables and Immoveables p 289. § 7. Goods in generall Devised what shall pass under that Notion p 306 307. § 1. Goods in Common Devised by Implication p 302. § 3. Grantees may be Devisees p 226. § 4. Ground Devised the Edifice thereon passeth thereby although Erected after the Devise made p 297. § 42. The Ground whereon a House stood which is after burnt belongs to the Devisee or Legatary p 304. § 14. H. Habendum how to be construed in a doubtfull Case of Devises p 243. § 7. Have or the word I have in what case it shall be taken in the Present Tense p. 295 § ult Heire the different Acceptations of that word in the Civil and Common Law p 202 § 1. In what case he may enter upon Lands Devised to be Sold. p. 139. § 3. In what case he and not the Executor shall have the mean Profits of Land Devised to be Sold. p 273 § 3. He shall take the Advantage of a Condition broken that is annexed to a Devise of Land Ibid § 2. A Devise to one and his Heir in the Singular Number is but a Devise for Life p 253 § 3. The Heirs Rights exclusively to the Executons p 83. In what case Heirs shall not take by a Devise though they are therein mentioned p 238 239 § ult In what case a Devise by that Word Heirs shall yet go to the Executors p 257 258 § 1 3. Hereticks in what Sense Testable or not p. 21 § 3. They are Incapable of a Legacy p 206. § 2. The Qualifications thereof Ibid Horse one Devised to two Persons how the Divident to be apportioned p. 304. § 15. By a Bequest of Horses shall Mares pass if the Testator had no Horses p 303. § 10. Hospital-Lands or their Rents-Arreare not Deviseable p 225. § 3. House Devised when the Testator had none or many or burnt or ruin'd pull'd down demolished or re-edisied The Law in such cases p 294 § 27 p 296 § 39. House Devised with all things therein how that shall be understood p. Ibid. § 31 p 302 303 § 7. The Ground whereon stood a House Devised and after burnt is the Legataries p 304. § 14. Houses are Devisable under the Notion of Lands p 224. § 2. p. 301. § ult Two Houses and but one Stable betwixt them with which House Devised shall the Stable pass p 294. § 30. Husband being neither Executor nor Administrator to his Wife is not liable for her Debts after her decease p. 130. § 5. J. Ideots Intestable the Qualifications thereof p. 12 13 § 3 6 p 14 § ult Jewels Bequeathed what pass under that Notion or not in a Devise p. 306 § ult In what case they are not to be put into the Inventory p. 99. § ult If in what cases that word amounts not to a Condition p. 216 § ult Implication sufficient whereby to pass a Legacy or Devise p. 235 in fin Whether Legacies may pass by an Implication of a contrary Condition p. 211 § 5. Impertinences destroy not Legacies p. 209 210 § 2. Impossibilities only seemingly such no prejudice to a Legacy p. 304 305 § 16. What Impossibility destroys a Legacy p 439 § 35. Impossibility imposed on the Condition of a Legacy voids the Condition but not the Legacy p 325 § 13. Incapacity in the Legatary how many ways it may happen p. 341 § 22. Incestuous Persons how far Testable or not p. 21 § 5. Infant incapable of Devising p. 289 § 10. Whether a new Publication after Minority gives life to a Devise that had none before Ibid. Infant under the Age of 21 Years may not Devise Land p. 226 § 3. Infant in the Womb whether capable of being a Legatary or Devisee p. 208 § 3. Infant-Executor at what Age he may Administer p. 67 § 2. What his power is Ibid. § 3. He is bound by his own Release if he receive the Money p. 71 § 5. His Release not good p. 68 § 5. At what Age Administration granted during his Minority shall cease p. 67 § 2 p 69 § ult His Release without consideration void Ibid. In what case he may have an Action of Detinue but not of Accompt p 71. § fin Interpretation of a Devise ought to be with the fairest advantage for the Devisee p 290 § 15. Several Rules in Law touching the Interpretation of Testaments and Devises p. 437 c. Intestables their several kinds p. 10. Inventory whether it may be made by an Executor before Probate of the Will p. 95 § 5. Within what time it is to be Exhibited p. 97 98 § 1. How and wherefore it is to be made and what to be inserted therein p Ibid. § 2 3 Inventories may be over-ruled by a Jury p. 107 § 4. Joynt-Executors must be all joyn'd in Suit p. 108 § 6. vid. Co-executors