binde the lessor otherwise of admittances upon surrenders or descents for he was tenant at sufferance who hath no lawfull interest and a Writ of entry ad terminum qui praeteriit lyes against him and so he is a deforceor Murrell and Smiths case 33. and 34. of the Queene fo 24. THe Queene grants a Copyhold in fee and after grants the inheritance of the Copyhold to a stranger the Copyholder devises to M. and after surrenders to the use of his will Resolved that custome hath so established the estate of a Copyholder that by severance of the inheritance of the Copyhold from the Mannor the Copyhold is not destroyed for being the Lord himselfe could not ouste the Copiholder no more can another claiming in by him Objected that every Copyhold ought to be parcell of the Mannor and to be demised or demisable time out of memory Resolved that because once this had both the incidents aforesaid and its perfection the severance made by the Lord shall not destroy it Resolved that notwithstanding the surrender and devise the Copyhold descended to the heire for after the severance of the inheritance from the Mannor the surrender was utterly voyd for the land was not parcell of the Mannor at the time and the devise onely cannot transferre such a customary estate but it ought to be by surrender into the hands of the Lord c. Resolved that after severance the Copyholder shall pay his rent to the Feoffee and shall pay and do other services which are due without admittance or holding of a Court as to plough the demeanes of the Lord Heriot c. but suite of Court and Fine upon alienation or admittance are gone for now the land cannot be aliened for though the Copyholder hath some benefit by the severance as appeares before so he hath great prejudice for now he cannot surrender or alien his estate nor the Feoffee cannot make an admittance for he is not dominus pro tempore Resolved that such forfeitures remaine as were before the severance as Feoffement lease wast denier of rent So if the land were of the nature of Borough English or Gavelkind and other customes which run with the land remaine And 't was said that such Copyholder hath no other meanes to alien but by Decree in Chancery against him and his heires but by this the interest of the land is not bound but the person onely Kite and Queintons case 31. of the Queene fo 25. COpyholder in fee surrenders out of Court by the custome to the hands of certaine Copyhold tenants to the use of another and his heires upon certaine condition at the next Court the surrender was presented but the condition omitted he to whose use c. dyes the Lord admits his heire he that made the surrender releases to the heire being in possession and after enters Resolved that the presentment of the surrender was voyde for that the condition was omitted for the surrender that the Copiholder made was not presented but if the surrender the condition had been presented and the Steward in entring of it omits the condition upon sufficient proofe of it the surrender shall not be avoyded but the roll amended for the roll doth not conclude the party for to plead or give in evidence the truth of the matter Resolved if a Copyholder be ousted by wrong a release by him to the disseisor doth not transferre his right because he hath not any customary estate upon which the release of the customary right may inure and this should be prejudiciall to the Lord for by this he shall lose his Fine and services but a release made to him which is admitted by the Lord and in possession is good and a release of a customary right may inure to him and the Lord not prejudiced and the release shall inure by way of extinguishment And Littleton speaks of an alienation by surrender onely which ought to be into the hands of the Lord but a release cannot be done to the Lord and Littleton says He which claimes a Copihold by surrender hath no other evidence but he which claimes an extinguishment of a right may have it by release by Deed and 't is no perill to purchasors for if the Copiholder in possession sels it he will shew the release and he which is out of possession cannot sell till he hath regained the possession caveat emptor By Wray if he which hath a pretensed title c. to a Copihold bargaines c. this is within 32. H. 8. for the Statute says any right or title and great part of the land within the Realme is in Copy and therefore the intention was to include them to avoyde maintenance and champerty Melwich and Luters case 30. of the Queene fo 26. REsolved that the lessee of a copiholder for a yeare shall maintaine an Ej ' Firmae for his terme being warranted by Law by force of the generall custome of the Realme 't is reason that he should have remedy by Ej ' Firmae And this is a speedy course against a Stranger Resolved that the Copiholds are not destroyed by severance of the inheritance of them from the Mannor but remaine in force So Murrels case before adjudged Resolved that when the Lord of a Mannor having many ancient Copiholds in a Towne grants the inheritance of all the Copiholds the grantee may hold a Court for the customary tenants and accept surrenders and make admittances and grants for every Mannor which consists of Freeholders and Copiholders comprehends in effect two severall Courts the one the Court Baron for Freeholders and in this the Suitors viz. the Freeholders are Judges and the other Court for the Copiholders and in this the Steward or the Lord himselfe is Judge and though this is not a Mannor in Law because it wants Freeholders yet the grantee may hold such Court as aforesaid for Copiholders onely as the grantor himselfe might So if all the Freeholds escheate or the Lord releases the tenure and services yet he may hold a customary Court for the Copiholds Note Reader though the Lord by his own act cannot make of one and the same Mannor at common Law divers severall Mannors consisting of Demeanes and Freeholders yet he may make a customary Mannor of Copiholders Resolved that the Lord himselfe may make a grant or admittance of a Copiholder out of the Mannor at what place he pleases but if the Steward at any Court holden out of the Mannor shall make grants or admittances they are voyd Neales case 37. of the Queene fo 26. ADjudged that where the Lord of a Mannor demises all his lands granted by Copy for two thousand yeares that the lessee may hold Courts for Copiholders as Melwiches case is before and 't was said so to be resolved in C. Hattons case Note Reader a good diversity where the number of the Copiholders may support the custome and a singular case of a Copiholder as in Murrels case before in which case the
a restraint against any particular person in certeine Vpon a Feoffement without warranty the Feoffee shall have all the Charters which comprize warranty and others though they be not given to him because hee is to defend the Title at his perill Upon a Feoffement with warranty without expresse grant the Feoffee shall not have any Charters which serve for to deraigne the warranty paramount Also the Feoffer shall have all Charters which serve for maintenance of the Title but the Feoffee shall have all which maintaine the possession as Court Rolls and which are concomitant and incident to the possession If A. be seized of a Segniorie rent advowson or other thing that lyeth in grant and grant the same over unto B. with warranty and B. grant that to C. with warranty In this case C. shall have the first deed although B. be bound to warrantie for without that he cannot make any Defence against A. or any claiming by him Pelhams Case 32. El. fo 14. A Tenant for life the remainder in Taile the remainder in fee bargaines and sells the Land to one who before the Statute of 14. El. ca. 8. suffers a recoverie in which A. is vouched and voucheth over and he in remainder enters and the entry is adjudged lawfull for the Recovery is a Forfeiture and the remainder may enter for it is the common Assurance As if Tenant for life had levied a Fine c. and suing of execution doth not toll the entry of the remainder and a Writ of error was sued and the plaintiffe release the errors Porters Case 35. El. fo 22. 32. H. 8. P. devised a house to his wife and her heires upon condition that she by advise c. with all convenient speed after his death should assure it c. for maintenance of a Free School c. for ever and dyes 32. H. 8. the wife enters and 3. E. 6. leases to A. for yeares the heire of P. enters and his entry adjudged lawfull because 23. H. 8. extends not to good uses nor doth it make the conveyance voyd or give entry but makes the use voyd and admit the use voyd yet the condition is not for Counsell may devise c. as to have a Corporation by Pattent and licence to assure and therefore the wife ought to have performed it Any man at this day may give Lands Tenements or hereditaments to any person or persons for the finding of a Preacher maintenance of a Schoole maimed Soulders poore people reparation of Churches High-wayes Bridges marriage of poore maids or any other charitable uses But it is good policy in every such Feoffment or estate to reserve to the Feoffor and his heires any small rent or to expresse some small summe of money for the consideration of the cause before recited Altonwoods Case 42. Eliz. fo 41. H. 8. seised of an estate Taile to him and the heires males of his body and of a Fee expectant grants in Taile and dyes without issue male adjuded that the grant is voyd for the King had an estate Taile in possession by which he might grant a lawfull estate for his own life and a Fee by which he might grant an estate Taile by speciall recitall And these words ex speciali gratia c. shall not produce a strainable construction against the rules of Law or in deceptionem regis Capells Case 23. Eliz. fo 62. A Tenant in Taile the remainder to B. in Taile B. grants a rent charge A. suffers a common recovery and dyes without issue the grantee distraines the Alienee of A. brings a Replevin adjudged for the alienee by all the Justices of England that a common recoverie against a Tenant in Tayle shall binde not onely the remainder and all Leases charges c. granted or made by him in remainder but also the Reversion and all Leases charges c. granted by him in reversion Archers Case 39. 40. Eliz. fo 66. LAnd was devised to the Father for life the remainder to the next heire male of the Father and to the heires males of his body the devisor dyes the Father infeoffes J. S. with warranty First it was resolved by Anderson and Walmeslowe et tot Cur. that the Father had but onely an estate for life for that he had an expresse estate for life demised unto him and the remainder is limitted to his next heire male in the singular number and his right heire male may not enter for the forfeiture in his life for he cannot be heire so long as he liveth Secondly It was resolved that the remainder to his right heire is a good remainder although he cannot have a right heire during his life but it sufficeth that it vesteth eo instanti that the particular estate determineth Dyer 14. Eliz. fo 309. Thirdly it was resolved which was the principall poynt in this case per tot Curiam that by the Feoffment of the Tenant for life the remainder was destroyed for every contingent remainder ought to vest either during the particular estate or at the least eo instanti that the particular estate determineth for if the particular estate be ended or determined in Deed or in Law before the contingency fall the remainder is voyd And in this case by the Feoffment of the Father his estate for life was determined by condition in Law which cannot be revived by any possibilitie for this cause the contingent remainder is voyd for by the Feoffment no right of the particular estate remaineth and the better opinion was that the warranty bindes the remainder though in Abeyance Bredons Case 39 40. Eliz Fol. 76. TEnant for life and the remainder in Taile joyne in a fine Come ceo c. to A. who renders a Rent charge of 40. l. a yeare to Tenant for life the remainder dies without issue the second remainder in taile enters Tenant for life distraines for the Rent adjudged he may and that the rent remaines after the death of Tenant in taile without issue during the life of Tenant for life the fine was no discontinuance for every one gave that which he might lawfully give and t is no forfeiture by Tenant for life for the Law construes this First to be a grant of him in remainder and after the grant of Tenant for life Vt res magis valeat c. If Tenant for life and the first remainder in Taile make a feoffement t is no discontinuance though the first remainder in taile dies without issue nor is it a forfeiture but the feoffee shall hold it during the life of Tenant for life but if it be without deed then t is a surrender of Tenant for life and the feoffement of the remainder Vt res magis valeat c. Corbets Case 42. Eliz Fol. 84. of Perpetuities C. Covenants to stand seised to the use of himselfe for life and after to the use of A. his Eldest Son and the Heires Males of his body the remainder to the use of B. his second Son and the
Heires Males of his Body c. And if A. or his issue c. shall attempt c. to alien c. by which any estate shall be barred c. that after such attempt and before any act executed the use and Estate of him so attempting c. shall cease onely as to him so attempting in the same degree as if he were naturally dead and not otherwise and that then it shall be immediately to such persons to whom it should come by the intent of the Indenture c. C. dyes A. suffers a recovery B. enters c. adjudged he could not for this proviso is repugnant impossible and against Law for the death of Tenant in taile is not a cesser of the Estate taile but death without issue Males and by this reason the issue should have it in the life of the Father c. And for every discent c. Death naturall or civill is requisite and t is not materiall though Tenant in taile had no issue at the time of the breach for t was repugnant at the beginning and the estate taile doth not commence by the having of issue and a gift in taile upon condition that if the Donee dyes his estate shall cease is a void condition Also the proviso is void for the incertainty as a gift to two Et haeredibus is voide though a Warranty be made to them and their Heirs in Jermine Arscotts Case the like proviso was adjudg'd voide for be the proviso a condition or a limitation the intire estate ought to be defeated by it and an Estate in Land cannot cease for part and continue for the residue nor cease for one person and continue for another nor cease for a time and revive after The like judgement was betwixt Chomly and Humble but the Parliament or Law may make an estate voide as to one and good to another as Tenant in speciall taile levies a fine the issue is barred not the wife so a release by the demandant to the vouchee is good not by a stranger so if an Executor surrender a tearme to one respect t is extinct to another t is assetts c. And uses are within the Statute De donis though it speakes onely of Lands and Tenements and there shall be a Possessio fratris c. of them for they are guided by the Rules of the common Law Richill in the time of R. 2. and Thirning in the time of H. 4. Justices intended for to make a perpetuity but could not Shelleyes Case 23. Eliz Fol. 94. EDward Shelley leased for yeares and after Covenanted to suffer a recovery which should be to the use of himselfe and after to the use of A. for 24. yeares and after to the Heires Males of the body of the said E S. and the Heires Males of the said Heires Males c. E. S. dyes 9 of Octob. the first day of the Terme in the morning betwixt five and six a clock the recovery passes the same day and an Habere facias seisinam awarded the recovery was executed the 19 of Octob. 4 Decemb. the Wife of the Eldest Son before dead of E. S. was delivered of a Son named Henry Richard the second Son of E. S. entered and made a Lease c. Henry entred upon the Lessee who brought an Eject firmae and Judgement was given for the Defendant and t was resolved that if Tenant in taile suffer a common recovery and dye before execution that execution may be sued against the issue for the intended recompence in favour of the common assurance resolved that the revertion in judgement of Law is not in the recoveror before execution sued for the judgement is Quod recuperet seisinam which cannot be executed till entry or claime as 't is of a Common c. granted upon condition for when a man may enter or claime the Law will not put things in him till entry or claime The third and great point resolved was that the Uncle is in as by discent though he shall not have his age nor be in ward 1. Because the recovery being the Originall act had its Essence in the life of E. S. to which the execution hath retrospect 2. Because the use might have vested in E. S. if he were in life 3. Neither the recoverors by their entry nor the Sheriffe by making execution may make an Inheritance to whom they please 4. Because the Uncle claimed the use by the recovery and Indenture and by words of limitation not purchase Albanies Case 28. Eliz Fo. 111. A By Indenture infeoffed B. of two Acres to the use of A. for life the remainder in taile to C. the remainder in fee to D. with a proviso if E. dye without issue that A. at any time by indenture sealed c. in the presence of foure c. may alter c. any use c. A. of the one acre infeoffes F. and for the other Acre A. by Indenture renounces surrenders releases c. to B. C. and D. the said power condition authority c. E. dyes without issue A. by Indenture in presence of foure revokes the first uses and limits new resolved that by the feoffement the power to revoke as to limit new uses was extinct and by Wray chiefe Justice the future power may be released as a condition subsequent though the performance or breach cannot be done without an act precedent but as to this poynt the Court did not give their resolution but the whole Court agreed that if the power had beene present as t is usuall this might be extinct to any one who hath a free hold in possession reversion or remainder 'T was moved if the future power could not be released whether it might be defeated by the words of defeasance both being executory and 't was said that in all cases when any thing executory is created by a deed that the same thing by consent of all parties to the creation by their deed may be nullified as a warranty recognizance rents charge annuities covenant c. And of the same opinion was Wray chiefe Justice and the whole Court and judgement given according Chudleighs Case Or the Case of perpetuities Fo. 120. SIr Richard Chudleigh was seised in fee of the Mannor of D. and had issue foure Sonnes A. B. C. D. and 26º Aprill the third and fourth of Phillip and Mary infeoffed E. F c. in fee to the use of himselfe and his Heires of the body of G. then Wife of H. and after to the use of the performance of his Will for ten yeares immediately after his death and after to the use of the feoffes and their Heires during the life of A. the Eldest Sonne the remainder to the use of the first issue Male of the body of A. and the Heires of the body of the first issue Male and so to the second issue Male the remainder to the use of B. the second Sonne and the Heires of his body the remainder to C.
dyes after R. enters and dyes 18. Eliz. the executor of T. enters and assignes to J. S. the Successor of the Rector enters and Leases to B. who upon ouster brought an Ej. Firmae Resolved for the Plaintiffe and that the Lease to T. is voyd Argued for T. that his demise was good and a difference taken betwixt terminum annorum and tempus annorum as in this case of the demise to T. during so many yeares of the fourescore yeares c. not of the terme of fourescore yeares if a Lease be made for 21. yeares and after another Lease to commence from the end and expiration of the said terme of yeares and after the first Lease is surrendered the second terme shall commence presently not so if it were from the end of the said 21. yeares Resolved that the demises to R. and W. are voyd because the terme that El. had was sub modo if she should so long live which is determined by her death ergo no residue can remaine to R. and W. and so 't was adjudged between Greene and Edwards and the Court agreed the diversity betwixt the demises to R. and W. and the demise to T. 't was argued that the demise to T. was voyd 1. Because that the Lessor had not power for to contract for the land during the fourescore yeares for he had but a possibility to have the land againe during the fourescore yeares viz. if El. dyed which possibility cannot be demised but the Court delivered no opinion to this poynt 2. That the Lease to T. was voyd for the incertainty how many yeares should be behinde at the death of El. a termor grants to B. so many yeares as shall be behinde tempore mortis suae 't is voyd Locrofts case adjudged a man possessed of a terme of 90. yeares upon marriage of his Sonne demised the land to his Sonne for 70. yeares to commence after his death the Lessor dyes the lease was adjudged good because here he demised the land for 70. yeares which is certaine in which this differs from 7. E. 6. which diversity was agreed by the whole Court 3. That 't was voyd because he dyed in the life of El. so that the incertainty cannot be reduced to a certainty in his life time and so cannot rest in the executors a lease to one for so many yeares as his Executors shall name is voyd Note a diversity betwixt a covenant and agreement which is perfect and certaine though it takes effect in possession upon a future matter precedent and a covenant and agreement incertaine which is to be reduced to a certainty by matter ex post facto for in the first case the estate is bound presently in the other not which was agreed by the Court. 4. It was moved if T. had been in life the demise could not rest in him T. dyed before R. or W. and R. survived El. and by the expresse condition precedent R. could not take except El. dyed within the terme and W. could not take except R. dyed within the terme and this is as much as to say that if R. dyes before El. and T. cannot take except W. dye in the life of El. and R. survived El. So that both precedent contingencies faile viz. the death of R. and W. in the life of El. and though the demise to R. and W. are voyd yet the limitation precedent viz. the death of R. and W. in the life of El. to the demise to T. is not voyd for his interest may depend upon both the contingencies for so was the intention of the parties and this was affirmed by the whole Court by Popham Chiefe Justice The Lease to T. was voyd for another cause for it cannot commence upon a contingent which depends upon another contingent as here the demise to T. depends upon the contingent annexed to the demise made to W. and the demise to W. depends upon a contingency annexed to the demise to R. Digges Case 42. Eliz. fo 173. C. Digges was seised of the land in question and other lands in fee and by Indenture 6. Maij. 10. of the Queene covenanted in consideration of marriage betwixt him and his wife and for the advancement of T. their Sonne and for two hundred pounds paid to him before marriage that he and his heires would stand seised to the use of himselfe for life and after to T. in taile and after to the use of himselfe in taile with a proviso for the considerations aforesaid c. that it should be lawfull for him at any time during his life with consent of certaine persons by Indenture to be Inrolled in any of the Kings Courts to revoke any of the uses or estates and for to limit new uses 6. Maij. 12. of the Queene C. by consent c. by Indenture inrolled in the Chancery revoked the uses and estates aforesaid in part of the land and limitted the use of it to him and his heires after 20. Sept. 13. of the Queene by Indenture with consent c. inrolled in Banck M. 13. 14. of the Queene declared that for the payment of his debts that from the time of the inrollment of this Deed in Chancery all the uses in the first Indenture should be voyd and that the land should be to the use of himselfe in fee after C. 26. Octob. 14. of the Queene by Indenture covenanted for to levie a Fine of all his land part of which should be to the use of himselfe and his wife and his heires which Fine was levied the same terme after the Indenture dated 20. Sept. was inrolled in Chancery after C. enters and makes his claime and whether C. dyed seised in fee of the land mentioned in the Deed of Revocation of 20. Sept. was the question Adjudged 1. that C. D. might revoke part at one time part at another till he hath revoked all but he can revoke the same part but once except that he hath a new power c. to uses newly limitted for these words at any time amount to from time to time c. 2 That where the revocation is to be by Deed Indented to be inrolled this is as much as to say as by Deed Indented and inrolled and till inrollment no revocation shall be for otherwise perchance none shall be inrolled 3. That 't was no perfect revocation by the Indenture of 20. Sept. till the Deed were inrolled in the Chancery for though that the proviso of revocation in the first Indenture shall be satisfied with an inrollment in any of the Kings Courts yet for that the Indenture of revocation it selfe limits the revocation to take effect after the inrollment in Chancery it ought to be so 4. That the Fine levied before the inrollment in Chancery which was before the revocation hath extinct the power see Albaines case before adjudged and Popham Chiefe Justice said that without question such a power might be released for 't is not meerely collaterall but savours and tastes of
house or not When a man maketh a feoffment of a Messuage cum pertinentii he departeth with nothing thereby but that which is parcell of the house as buildings curtelage and gardens If a Lessee for yeares makes a Lease for a certaine Tearme of any parcell and so divides the possession thereof from the residue if of this parcell so severed Liverie be made the possession in the residue by the first lessee is not any impediment to the liverie of this parcell otherwise if a Lessee make a Lease at will of any parcell there his possession of the residue shall hinder the liverie made in this parcell and with this judgement agreed all the other Justices and Serjeants of Serjeants Inne in Fleete-streete Doddingtons Case 27. Eliz. fo 32. KIng H. 8. Ex certa scientia c. granted to A. for 300 l. Omnia illa Messuagia in tenura Johannis Browne Scituate in Well nuper prioratini de W. Spectant ' And in truth the Lands lie in D. in this Case 't was resolved that the grant was voide by the Common Law as well in case of a common person as the King because the grant is generall and is restrained to one certaine Village and the grantee shall not have any Lands out of that Village to which the generallity of the grant is referred for this Pronoune Illa hath his necessary reference as well to the Towne as well as to the Tenure of I. B. for if eyther the one or the other faile the grant is voide And so it was adjudged Per tot cur de Banco Regis Resolved also that this grant was not holpen by the Statute of 34. H. 8. For no grants are holpen by this Statute nor by any act of confirmation but such as comprehend convenient certainty 1. Quia generale nihil certum implicat And here no Tenements are mentioned to be granted because the generall grant being intire was referred to a falsity and therefore it cannot be said that the Towne was misnamed and great inconvenience would follow if c. for the King should be deceived but the Statute helpes when there is a convenient certainty as a Mannor Farme Land knowne by a certaine name or containing so many Acres c. So that it may appeare what things the King intended to passe Note t is the most sure way for the Pattentee to expresse as much as he can in certainty before the generall words SIR Rowland Heywards Case In cur Wardor 37. Eliz. fo 35. SIr Rowland Heyward seised of a Mannor in Demeans and rents in consideration of money doth demise grant Bargaine and sell to A. the said Mannours Lands Tenements and the reversions and remainders with all Rents reserved upon any demise to have and to hold to A. and his asignes after the death of the Lessor for seaventeene yeares rendring a rose the Indenture was inrolled and after the Lessor by Indenture doth Covenant with B. to stand seised of the premises to the use of himselfe and the Heires of his body and no attornment was made to A. The Question was What passed to A and it was resolved by Popham and Anderson chiefe Justices and the Court that A. may have his election eyther to take the same by demise at the common Law or by bargaine and Sale Per Statutum 27. H. 8. without attornment for it was one entire demise and bargaine of one Mannor without any fraction or division thereof and this election remaineth to A. and his Executors and assignes for here is not Election to claime one of two severall things by one Title but to claime one thing by one of the two severall Titles for where the things are severall nothing passeth before Election and the Election must precede but when one thing passeth the Election of the Title may be subsequent For if I. have 3 Horses and doe give to you one of them the property comenceth by Election and must be made in the life of the Parties The Bi of Sarum had a great wood of 1000 Acres called Brerewood and infeoffed another of one House and seaventeene Acres parcell of the Wood and made Liverie in the Wood House nothing passeth of the Wood before Election and the Heire of the feoffee may not make Election Bullocks Case 10. Eliz. Dyer In case where election is given of two several things he which is the primer Agent and that ought to doe the first act shall have alwayes the Election As if a man grant a Rent of twenty Shillings or a Robe the Grantor shall have the Election for he is the primer Agent eyther by paying the one or delivering the other If a man make a Lease rendring twenty shillings or a Robe the Lessee shall have the Election Causa qua supra but if I give unto you one of my Horses in my Stable there you shall have the Election for you are the Primer Agent by taking or seising one of them and so of twenty trees in my Wood. Note for Elections these diversities 1. When nothing passes to the grantee c. before Election there it ought to be made in the life of the Parties but when the Estate passes presently c. the Grantee c his Heire or Executor may elect 2. When the same thing passes and the Donee c. hath Election in what manner c. he will take it the Donee Heire or Executor may elect 3. When Election is given to severall persons the first shall stand 4. When Election is given of two severall things he which ought to doe the first Act shall have Election 5. When the thing granted is annuall and to have continuance there the Election remaines to the Grantor in case where the Law gives him Election as well after the day as before otherwise t is when the thing is to be performed Vnica vice 6. The feoffee c. by his act may forfeit his Election as if A. infeoffe B. of two Acres Habendum the one for life the other in Taile and hee before Election makes a feoffement of both here the feoffor shall enter in which he pleases for the wrong of the feoffee 7. Though the Lessees here enter generally yet they may Elect after so if one be Executor and Devisee of a terme and enters generally c. and after the Lessees in the principall case made Election for to take by bargaine and Sale and had the Rents The Bishop of Winchesters Case 38. El. fo 43. In a prohibition REsolved that at common Law none had capacity to take Tythes but spirituall persons or Persona mixta as the King and regularly no meere Lay man was capable of them except in speciall Cases for he could not sue for them in Court Christian and regularly a lay man had no remedy for them till 32 H. 8. A Lay-Man may be discharged of Tythes at the common Law by grant or by composition but not by prescription for it is commonly said in our Law-Books that a lay man may
the husband had and to the remainder A. tenant in taile the remainder to B. the remainder to C. the remainder to D. A. makes a Feoffement the feoffee suffers a recovery B. is vouched and he vouches the common vouchee A. is not bound but B. and all the remainders are for though the remainders are discontinued and cannot be remitted till the taile be recontinued yet in a common recovery which is the common assurance he which comes in as vouchee shall be in judgement of Law in privity of the estate which he ever had though the precedent estate upon which the estate of the vouchee depends be discontinued so here the husband shall be said in of the taile and 't is the stronger because the estate of the wife was put to a right so that the husband came in as sole tenant in taile and not joyntly with his wife because she is not vouchee and he cannot be in of another estate because once he had a taile but had they had a joynt estate to them and the heires of their two bodies he being onely vouched it might be doubted whether the taile should be barred because the wife had a joynt inheritance with him 8. of the Queene Dyer Knivetons case A Praecipe is brought against tenant for life and the remainder in taile they vouch over it shall not binde the taile for the remainder is not tenant to the Praecipe and the land is recovered against the tenant for life onely and recompence shall not goe to the remainder and the remainder was never seised by force of the taile and so 't was adjudged in Leach and Coles case 41. of the Queene Heydons case 26. of the Queene fo 7. THe Gardians and Cannons Regular of the late Colledge of O. seised of the Mannor of O. granted a Coppihold to Father and Sonne for their lives c. and after they leased it to H. for fourescore yeares rendring the ancient Rent and after surrendred their Colledge Resolved that the lease to H. was voyd the Coppi-hold for life continuing by the Statute of 31. H. 8. For Coppihold is an estate for life and the Statute saith of which any estate or interest for life c. at the making of such grant had continuance reade the Booke at large where you have admirable rules for true interpretation of all Statutes Resolved when a Parliament alters the service tenure interest of the land c. in prejudice of the Lord custome or tenant the generall words shall not extend to Coppi-holds as the Statute of W. 2. de donis conditionalibus doth not extend to them for if the Statute should alter the estate this should also alter the tenure for the donee ought to hold of the donor and to doe such services without speciall reservation as his donor did to the Lord and the intent of the act was not to extend to such base estates which were taken then but tenants at will and the Statute saith Voluntas donatoris observetur in carta c. So that which shall be intailed ought to be such an hereditament which may be given by Charter and great part of the land within the Realme being granted by Coppy it would be inconvenient that Coppi-holds should be intailed yet neither Fine nor Recovery should barre them so that the owner cannot without making a forfeiture by assent of the Lord and a new grant dispose of it for payment of debts advancement of his wife or younger issues wherefore the Statute doth not extend to them by Manwood Ch' Baron which the Court agreed But 't was objected that the Custome and the Statute cooperating might make a taile as if by a custome a remainder had been limitted over and injoyed and plaints in nature of a Formedon in discender brought and the land recovered by it so neither the custome without the Statute nor the Statute without the custome can make a taile And Littleton saith that if a custome hath been that lands c. have been granted c. or in taile c. paulo post that a Formedon in discender lyes of all tenements which Writ was not at common law Manwood answered if the Statute doth not extend to them without question the custome cannot for before the Statute all estates of inheritance were fee simple and no custome can commence after the Statute for this being made 13. E. 1. is made within time of memory and Littleton is to be intended of a fee simple conditionall for he knew well that no custome could commence after the Statute of W. 2. as appeares in his booke 2. ca. 10. and 34. H. 6. and a Formedon in discender in speciall cases lay at the common Law And by the Court another Act made at the same time which gives an Elegit extends not to Coppiholds for the reason aforesaid but other Statutes made at the same time extend to them as ca ' 3. which gives a Cui in vita receite and ca ' 4. which gives to the particular tenant a Quod ei deforceat Resolved that though 't was not found that the said rents were the usuall rents accustomed to be reserved within 20. yeares before yet because 't was found that the accustomed rent was reserved and a custome goes to all times before it shall be so intended without shewing the contrary and judgement was enterd for the Queene The common Law is founded upon the perfection of reason and not according to any private and sudden conceite or opinion Borastons Case 29. of the Queene fo 19. B. Devised land for eight yeares and after to his executors to performe his will till H. his youngest Sonne come to the age of 21. yeares and when H. comes to 21. yeares then that he shall have to him and his heires H. dyed at the age of 9. yeares Objected that till H. attaines to 21. yeares the land descends to the heire and for that he never attained to 21. yeares this remaines in the heire and the intent appeares by the words that he should not have till he come to 21. yeares and this ought to precede the commencement of the remainder and if land were leased till H. comes to 21. yeares H. then being of 9. yeares 't is no absolute lease for 12. yeares for if H dye before 21. the lease shall be determined which the Court agreed 'T was also said that when the particular estate which should support the remainder may determine before the remainder can commence there the remainder doth not vest presently but depends in contingency If one make a Lease to A. for life and after the death of B. the remainder to another in Fee this remainder depends upon contingency for if A. dye before B. the remainder is voyd A Lease is made to A. for life the remainder to B. for life and if B. dye before A. the remainder to C. for life this is a good remainder upon contingency If A. survive B. which case is all one with
A Man leaseth S. for 10. yeares and C. for 20. yeares and both to another for 40. yeares after the end of the said severall demises ten yeares expire the last Lessee enters into S. and upon ouster brings trespasse and recovereth for the joynt words of the parties shall be taken Respective and the leases shall commence severally upon the severall determination of the said leases Joynt words shall be taken severally 1. In respect of the severall interest of the grantors as if two Tenants in common grant a rent charge 2. In respect of the severall interest of the grantees as a joynt warranty to two severall Tenants 3. In respect that the grant cannot commence at one time as a remainder limitted to the right heires of I. S. and I. N. 4. In respect of the incapacity of the grantees to take joyntly 5. Ratione subjectae materiae as rent granted to two copartners for equality of partition 6. Ne res destruatur ut evitetur absurdum as in Cessavit the tenure is alleadged by homage fealty and rent and quod in faciendo servitia praedicta cessavit it shall be construed to such services onely as of which a man may cease Brudenells Case 34. Eliz. banco regis fo 9. IF a lease be made to A. during the life of B. and C. without saying during the life of the survivor of them if one of them die yet the estate is not determined But A. shall have the land during the life of the survivor for if a man make a lease of Land to two persons during their lives they assigne over their estate now the assignee hath estate for life of them too and if one dye he shall have the land during the life of the Survivor Note two diversities th one a limitation in this Case aforesaid th' other a condition for if a man demyse Land for 100. yeares if A. and B. live so long in this case if th' one of them dye the Lease is determined for the Lease is conditionall and not Determinable by limmitation of estate and the life of a man is collaterall to the Lease which is but onely a Chattle If an administrator have judgement and dye his Executors cannot sue execution of that judgement but he that shall be subject to the payment of the Debts of the first intestate and that are not the Executors of the administrator vide 26. H. 8. fo 7. Hensteads Case 36. 37. Eliz. com banco fo 10. A Feme lessor or lessee at will taketh Husband the will is not determined for it may be prejudiciall to the Husband to have it determined So if one of the Lessees or Lessors at will dye but in case where one of the joynt Lessees at will dyeth nothing surviveth but the others shall pay all the rent Jues Case 39 40. Eliz. com banco fo 11. I. Leaseth a Mannor to S. for thirty yeares excepting Woode and underwood growing upon it and after Leased to him the Woode for 62. yeares without impeachment of wast and leaseth to him the Mannor for thirty yeares after expiration of the first thirty yeares thirty yeares expire S. maketh wast I bringeth an action of wast 1. Resolved by the exception of Wood and Underwood the soile is excepted and the woods growing c. are of abundance 2. The Wood remaines parcell of the Mannor because the Lessor had the intire freehold otherwise if he had leased for life with such an exception so if one lease a Mannor excepting the advowson for life the advowson is in grosse for life but if he grant the advowson for life it remaines appendant 3. By the acceptance of the third lease the said Lease of the Wood for 62. yeares was presently surrendered because the Lessee hath affirmed the Lessor to be able to Lease Saunders Case fo 12.41 Eliz. com banco In an Action of wast IF a man have Land in part whereof there is a Cole-myne appearing and he demise the Land to another for life or yeares the Lessee may dig for cole c. And the reason is for that the Myne is open at the time of the demyse c. and when he demyseth all his Lands it shall be intended that his meaning was that all the profit of the Land should passe c. but if the Myne be not open but within the Bowels of the Earth at the time of the demise 't is otherwise Also if a man have in his Lands hidden or unknowne Mynes and Lease the same Lands and all Mynes therein the Lessee may dig for them Rosses case 41. 42. Eliz. A Lease is made to A. and his Assignes for his life and the life of B. and C. this is a Lease for three lives and the Survivor of them Countesse de Salops Case fo 13.42 43. Eliz. banco regis SHe brought an action of the Case against Crompton and declared that shee demised to him a House at will Et quod ille tam negligenter improvide custodivit ignemsuum quod domus illa combusta fuit the defendant pleaded Non culpa and it was found not guilty And 't was adjudged that for the permissive wast no Action lyeth against the opinion of Brooke in Title wast 52. And the reason of this judgement was for that at the common Law no remedy lyeth for wast either voluntary or permissive against the Lessee for life or yeares because the Lessee hath interest in the Land by the act of the Lessor and it was his folly to make such a Lease and not to restraine him by Covenant condition c. And by the same reason Tenant at will shall not be punished for permissive wast But if Tenant at will commit voluntary wast as pulling downe of houses cutting of Trees a generall action of trespasse lyeth against him for that these doe amount to the determination of the will without the entry of the Lessor but it was agreed that in some Cases where there is confidence put in the party an action of the Case lyeth for negligence although the Defendant commeth to the possession by the act of the Plaintiffe as 12. E. 4.13 If one doe commit his Horse to one to keepe safely the Defendant Equum illum tam negligenter custodivit quod ob defectum bonae custodiae interijt an action upon the Case lyeth for this Breach of trust also 2. H. 7.11 If my Shepheard which I trust with my Sheepe and by his negligence they be drowned or otherwise perish an action upon the case lyeth against him but in this case at the Barre there was a demise at will made to the Defendant and no confidence repos'd in him wherefore it was ordered that the Plaintiffe should not recover by her Bill Case of Ecclesiasticall Persons 43. Eliz. fo 14. In the High Court of Parliament AT a Parliament holden in this Michaelmasterme it was resolved by the two chiefe Justices Popham and Anderson and diverse other Justices Assistants to the Lord of the
in Banco Regis BY the Law it is not sufficient that the testator be of memory when he makes his Will to answer to ordinary and usuall questions but he ought to have a disposing memory so as he is able to make disposition of his Lands with understanding and reason And this is such a memory which is called safe and perfect memory otherwise a Prohibition lyeth at the common Law generally to stay all the proceedings in the spirituall Court as the probate of the Will c. untill this Suggestion be tryed at the common Law Reades Case 42. Eliz. banco regis fo 24. IN trespasse the Defendant makes Title for that A. W. was seised in fee and leased to him the Plaintiffe maketh title by discent and traverseth the Lease and good for it may be true that A. W. was seised and yet that a discent was cast to the Plaintiffe therefore the Lease is most materiall to be traversed Helyars Case 41. Eliz. banco regis fo 24. IN a Replevin the Defendant avoweth by grant of a terme by I. A. to S. from whom he claimeth the Plaintiffe pleads in barre that I. A. married T. who by a former deed granted the terme to the plaintiffe and traverseth the grant made to S. and vitious for he who claimeth by the first assignement shall not traverse the second but he who claimes by the second shall traverse the first But the first Feoffee shall traverse the last feoffment and the last feoffee shall not traverse the first feoffement because fee may be gained by disseisin after the first feoffement but a Lease for yeares caanot Ruddocks case 41. Eliz. banco regis fo 25. IN replevyn against six the Plaintiffe recovers the Defendants bring error the Plaintiffe pleads the release of one of them not good Where diverse are to recover a personall thing the release or default of one barres all but not where they are to discharge themselves of a personalty if they are compelled to joyne as in error and attaint otherwise in Outlary because not compellable to joyne for where they are to discharge themselves they have no joynt interest and although they shall have their damages againe it shall be intended that they paid them of their severall goods otherwise it may be doubted if Execution had beene made of goods which they have joyntly Sharps case 42. Eliz. fo 26. com banco IF a man make a feoffement in Fee or a Lease for life and say to the Feoffee being eyther on the Lands of within the view Enter into this Land and enjoy the same according to this deed c. this is a good livery but the delivery of the deede upon the Lands without any further ceremony or saying doth not amount to a livery Throughgoods Case 9. Jacob in the nineth Booke The actuall delivery of a Writing sealed to the party without any words is a good livery but not a livery of seisin although the Party be upon the ground If I deliver a deede unto the feoffee or Lessee of the Messuage mentioned in the deede in the name of seisin of the said Messuage and of all the Lands tenements c. in the same contained or other such like words without any ceremony or act done this is a good seisin The Case of Souldiers 43. Eliz. fo 27. THe Statutes of 7. H. 7. cap. 1. and 3. H. 8. cap. 5. against Souldiers who run away are acts perpetuall for the word King includeth all his succession and a gift to the King inureth to his Successors Vicount Mountagues Case 43. Eliz. in Scaccar fol. 27. VIcount M. with License of the K. suffers a recovery to B. and D. to uses with power of revocation and limitting of new and revokes and limits new uses the King shall have no fine for alienation 1. Resolved if the King doth license to alien to one and alienation is made to the use of another the King shall not have a fine for although that the King was not informed of his Tenant yet the use is executed by the Statute of 27. H. 8. which can doe no wrong and the proviso in the Statute that a fine shall be paid for executing of uses is to be intended of uses raised by Covenant or declared upon a Fine Feoffement c. when no License of alienation is obtained 2. Although that by revocation and new limittation of uses the tenant of the King be altered yet no fine is due because all ariseth out of the estate of B. and D. which was made with License Greenes Case 44. Eliz. banco regis fol. 29. TEnant for life of a Mannor to which an advowson is appendant the remainder in Fee to I. S. presenteth one who at the suite of the Tenant for life is deprived for not reading the Articles but no notice is given to the Patron the Queene by lapse presents the Defendant Tenant for life and his incumbent die he in the remainder presents the Plaintiffe Greene who recovereth 1. Resolv Although the Patron were party to the Suite and so had notice yet lapse shall not incurre without notice given by the ordinary as the Statute speakes and the notice ought to be speciall that he did not reade the Articles and therefore was deprived and generall notice is not sufficient 2. The Church is voyd Ipso facto by the Statute of 13. Eliz. without deprivation 3. If the Queene present Ratione Lapsus where shee is Patron this is voyd A fortiori when shee had no title at all 4. The Patron is not put to a Quare impedit by presenting him who read not the Articles nor by Collation but by Collation of him who had right to Collate the Patron is put out of possession 5. The Queene may be put out of possession of an advowson because it is transitory but shee cannot be put to a Writ of right of advowson for none can gaine the Inheritance from her by wrong Boothies Case 3. Jacobi com banco fol. 30. THe condition of an Obligation is to deliver an Obligation to the Obligee and to acknowledge satisfaction it must be done in convenient time for acts transitory to be done to the Obligee although a place be appointed shall be done in convenient time and acts of their nature locall ought to be performed in convenient time if concurrence of the Obligor and Obligee be not requisite Also here the delivery of the bond being transitory and the acknowleding satisfaction such an act as may be performed in the absence of the Obligee they ought to be done in convenient time without request but if the Act be locall and their concurrence necessary the Obligor had time during his Life if not hastened by request If the concurrence of the Obligor and a stranger be necessary it ought to be done in convenient time if concurrence of the Obligee and a stranger it ought to be hastened by request And alwaies if the Act to be done is not for the benefit of the Obligee
nor body were lyable to Execution in Debt or damages recovered but Execution was to be done by Fieri facias or Levari facias of his Goods and Chattells and profits growing upon his Land but in debt brought against one as heire his Land was liable to Execution because the Plaintiffe had no other remedy for the goods belong to the Executors but the body goods and Lands of the K. Debtor or accomptant were ever liable to Execution but such Levari facias or Fieri facias ought to have beene sued within the yeare or otherwise he was chased to his Writ of Debt and now by Westm 2. c. 45. he may have a Scire facias and by the 18º Chapter of that Statute an Elegiâ— is given of the moity of the Land which was the first Act that subjected Land to Execution for Debt or Recognizance and by the Statute of 13. E. 1. de Mercatoribus 27. E. 3. c. 9. 23. H. 8. c. 6. In Statute Merchant and Statute Staple all the Lands of the Conusor at the day of acknowledgement shall be extended into whose hands soever they shall after come But in all Actions Vi armis where a Capias lyeth in Processe there after judgement a capias ad satisfaciendum lyeth the K. shall have a Capias pro fine and in such cases the Law the preserver of peace subjecteth the body to Imprisonment and by Marlebridge c. 23. West 2. c. 11. a Capias was given in an accompt the proces before being a distresse infinite and by 25. E. 3. c. 17. the same proces given in Debt as in account for before this Act the body was not liable to Execution for Debt as aforesaid 2. If Land of the heire be seised in Execution upon a recognizance of his auncestor he shall not have contribution against a purchasor of his Auncestor although he come in without consideration and although the Heire be not charged as Heire but partly as Terretenant but one purchasor shall have contribution against another purchasor and one Heire against another Heire because they are in Aequali jure and therefore the Writ here which issued against the Heires without naming the purchasor is good although he be charged as Terretenant The Heire shall have an Audita quaerela as well as the Conusor himselfe before Execution sued and a Supersedeas but a Stranger shall not If diverse acknowledge a recognizance the charge doth not survive and the Land of one shall not be put in Execution but all their Lands equally so if two are bound to warranty both or their Heires and the survivor and the Heire of the other shall be jointly vouched and the Land of both shall be rendered in value But if Baron and Feme and the Heires of the Feme are bound to warranty and the Feme dye the Land of the Baron may be solely taken in Execution because there are no Moities betweene Baron and Feme So that when Land shall be charged by any Lien the charge ought to be equall but in a Lien personall otherwise it is as if two are bound in an Obligation there the charge shall survive But a Purchasor Bona fide before any Action brought shall not be subject to any charge And three Errors were moved in the record 1. The Scire facias was Haerediterrarum c. which is improper for he is not Heire to the Land but to his auncestor 2. The Writ is Scire facias haeredi terrarum c. and the Retorne is Scire fecit W. H. militi haeredi praedicti M. and every Retorne must answer the point of the Writ 3. The judgement is generall against Sir W. H. where it ought to be speciall for otherwise his owne Land shall be liable where by the Law the Land onely which came to him by his Father ought to be charged and he is charged as Terrtenant as aforesaid but these poynts were not resolved by the Court. Nota the new Writ of Error after entry of the first was not brought Quod coram vobis residet because the Record is not removed out of the keeping of him who had the custody thereof before A Perfect Table of the Principall matters contained in every Case in this Booke WHAT words doe make a generall warranty and to whom the custody of evidences doth belong Page 1 Tenant for life commeth in as Vouchee in a common recovery it is a forfeiture Page 1 2 23. H. 8. Extends not to suppresse good uses the conveyance good and the bad use void any man may give Lands to Charitable uses Page 2 Touching the Exposition of the Kings grants and how the words Ex speciali gratia mero motu c. therein shall be construed Page 3 A common Recovery by Tenant in taile binds them in remainder and reversion and all Leases and charges granted by them ib. A feoffement by Tenant for life destroyeth a contingent remainder Page 4 Conusee of Tenant for life and him in remainder in taile renders a rent to Tenant for life it is good during his life ib. Tenant for life and he in remainder in taile infeoffe I. S. it is no discontinuance or forfeiture otherwise if without deede Page 5 Perpetuities are against Law but the Parliament or Law may make an estate as to one and good to another Page 5 6 Tenant in taile suffers a recovery and dyes before Execution it may be sued against the issuâ— and when a man may enter or claime the Law will not put things in him till entry or claime Page 7 A man may be in by discent and yet not have his â—…ge ib. A future power of revocation may be released Page 8 When any thing Executory is created by consent of all it may be voided Page 8 A feoffement by feoffees devesteth all future uses contingent Page 9 27. H. 8. Transferreth the possession to uses onely In esse ib. When a remainder ought to vest ib. 27. H. 8. Of uses shall not be taken by equity ib. A diversity when Tenant for life infeoffeth the reversioner mediate and when imediate there it is no forfeiture ib. A disseissor may make admittances but not voluntary grants Page 11 A difference when a confirmation is made to one that is in upon an expresse condition and when not there the estate is absolute ib. Every fee simple may be charged one way or other Page 12 A difference betweene Terminus annorum Tempus annorum Page 13 A Termor grants to B. so many yeares as shall be behind Tempore mortis suae it is void otherwise if for a certeine number of yeares ib. A lease cannot comence upon a double contingency Page 14 He who hath a power of revocation may doe it part at one time and part at another time till he hath revoked all Page 15 By the same conveyance the old uses may be revoked and new raised Page 16 Vpon what conveyances uses may be raised upon a generall consideration Page 16 17 An Action of
be divided For he had not the Mannor of H. for his Wife had it joyntly with him See many excellent Cases in the Booke at large adjudged upon this word Having in the Statutes the Initium of a Will ought to be full and perfect which is the writing and therefore if the devisor command one to write his Will and he devises white Acre to A. and his Heires and black Acre to B. and his Heires and dyes before the devise to B. is written yet the devise to A. is good But if he devises to A. c. upon condition and he writes the devise and the Testator dyes before the Writing of the condition t is voyd for in the one case the devises are severall and the one is perfect in the other Case t is maimed and imperfect for the intire devise was not fully put in writing so t was resolved in the Case at Barre that neither the commencement nor the end of the Will was full or perfect for at the time of writing of it and at the death of the devisor he had no power in respect of the joynt estate in H. to dispose all the Mannor of T. which amounts to the value of two parts of all Also upon the first Branch he ought to have a sole estate and here his Wife is joyntly seised with him and shee cannot disagree during coverture The Statute gives liberty to him for to devise two parts by will but this is to be intended of such Land which he might convey by act executed but here by reason of the undivided estate of the Wife he cannot dispose it but during coverture Also the third part of cleere yearly value is saved to the King and the intent of the Statute was that the King shall have the equall benefit at least for his third part as the devisee hath for two parts but here the devisee had two parts absolutely and the King but a possibility Viz. If the Wife would disagree which is at her pleasure and this Statute hath been constru'd that equality should be observed A man which held three Mannors of three Lords could not devise two of them but two parts of every one upon these words Cleere yearly value 't was said that of Inheritances which are not of any yearly value some are devisable some not as Bona et catalla felonum fugit or utlagat Fines amerciaments within such a Mannor or Towne these cannot be devised nor left to discend but a Leete Waife or Stray or other hereditament appendant or appurtenant to a Mannor passe by devise of the Mannor with th' appurtenances as incidents and the Statute had no intent for to dismember these things which by lawfull prescription had beene united But if a hundred with goods of Fellons Outlaws Fines Amerciaments returne of Writts and such other casuall hereditaments within the same hundred have beene accustomably demised for a yearely rent they may be devised within the purview of the said Act. 'T was said upon the words of the Statute which says that he may devise a rent common c. Out of two parts that a devise of a rent of the full value out of all is voyd but out of two parts 't is good And 't was observed that upon 32. H. 8. a devile of all his land had beene good for two parts as adjudged in Vntons Case for Land is severable but a rent is a thing intire and 34. H. 8. onely gives authority for to devise it The second branch which speakes of division cannot be satisfied for during his life he himselfe could not Set it out and after his death it survives to the Wife The third and fourth branch is not satisfied in this word immediatly for till disagreement without question the Mannor of H. survived to the Wife and if an Office had beene found before disagreement without doubt the Queene should have a third part of the Mannor of T. and the devise being voyd at the death of the devisor the third part lawfully vested in the Heire by discent it cannot be made good and devested by a subsequent disagreement Littleton discent to the Heire of Tenant by the courtesy of a disseissoresse doth not take away entry for the Heire comes not in immediatly 't was agreed if a man devises two acres holden by Knights service and a reversion upon a Lease for life discends to the heire this is no immediate discent within the Statute but the third part of the two ought to discend see many excellent Cases of devises adjudged upon the Statute Another good Case of relations Jennings and Braggs Case a disseisee makes an Indenture purporting a Lease for yeares and delivers it to a stranger out of the Land as an Escroule and commands him for to enter and deliver this as his deed to the Lessee who doth it and adjudged a good Lease and this diversity agreed First When the person at the first delivery hath not ability to make the contract and before the second delivery hath 't is voyd as an Infant and a Fème covert otherwise when at first delivery the person hath ability but cannot perfect it till an impediment removed which is done before the second delivery there 't is good as at Barre Resolved secondly that to some intent the second delivery shall have relation to the former by fiction of Law Vt res magis valeat quam pereat as if a Feme sole deliver a Lease as an escroule and after takes Husband or dyes yet by the second delivery 't is a good deed Ab initio and to some intent Vt res magis valeat c. it shall not relate yet in truth the second delivery hath all its force by the first and is but an execution and consummation of the former as at Barre for if it should relate to the first delivery then it would avoyd the lease for it should be made by one who was out of possession fictio legis inique operatur alicui damnum vel injuriam Thirdly 't was resolved that as to collaterall acts that there shall be no relation Omninò as if the Obligee release before the second delivery such release is voyd Ratcliffes case 34. of the Queene fo 37. A. Feme sole devises Socage land to the sonne of her daughter in taile the remainder to two Sisters of the devisee and to the heires of their two bodies by equall portions to be divided the remainder in fee to the Mother of the daughters and dyes the sonne dyes without issue Martha one of the daughters dwelling in her Mothers house daughter of the devisor within the age of 16. and above 14. departed at the second houre in the night with the consent of the husband of her Mother in whose house she was 8. miles and there married E. R. the issue was whether E.R. the Mother had the custody of the said M. at the time of the contract and marriage aforesaid for if she had then the
land of M. was lost by the Statute of 4. and 5. P. and M. ca ' 8. Resolved that there were two manners of custodies or Gardianships the one by the common law the other by the Statute at common Law foure manner of Gardians viz Gardian in Chivalry Socage Nature by Nurture The first two are fully described in our Bookes but great controversie was at barre for Gardian by Nature Some held that the Father onely shall have the custody of his sonne and heire apparent within age not the Mother Grandfather c. Also that the Father shall not have the custody of his daughter and heire for it ought to be such an heire as shall continue sole and apparent heire as the Father shall not have the custody of the youngest sonne in Borough English for tenure in Chivalry Others affirme that not onely the Father but every auncestor male or female shall have the custody of his heire apparent male or female Trespas quare 〈◊〉 consanguinium haeredem of the plaintiffe cujus maritagium ad ipsum pertinet c. rapuit c. lyes The Mother though she had no land brought ravishment of ward of J. her Sonne and heire against the grandfather who had land that might descend By the Court both erre for 't is true that every auncestor shall have trespas or ravishment of ward against a stranger for his heire male or female and the Writ shall say Cujus maritagium ad ipsum pertinet and good reason for the establishment of his house consists upon providing of a convenient marriage for his heire apparant and it matters not of what age such heire is but such action lyes not against gardian in chivalry by any of his auncestors but the Father So the Court resolved here the Mother could not be gardian in Socage if the land had descended to the daughter nor by nurture because she was above 14. but the common Law gives remedy against a Stranger as aforesaid Resolved here the Mother shall have the custody within the provision of the Act which hath ordained two new manners of custodies 1. By reason of nature 2. By assignation the first the Father after his death the Mother the second by assignation of the Father by his will or any act in his life See the Booke at large for the exposition of this Statute Resolved that the assent of the husband was not materiall for the Statute hath annexed the custody to the person of the Mother jure naturae which is inseperable and by marriage cannot be transferred to the husband the Father shall not forfeit the wardship by outlawry nor shall his Executors have it Resolved though she departed out of the house sixe houres before the contract yet in judgement of Law the Mother had the custody at the time of the contract for 't is inseperably annexed to the person of the Mother Resolved that by this devise the two daughters wete tenants in common in taile by these words equally to be divided though they never make partition in facto and so it hath been often adjudged Resolved that the husband and wife damsell had good title upon this verdict against the other daughter for by these words to the next of kin to whom the inheritance should c. come after her decease during the life of such person who shall so contract c. it seemes the daughter shall not have the forfeiture for though she be of the blood yet if M. dye her issue shall have the land if without issue the Mother in the remainder To the objection that the Mother cannot have it for she is not of the blood of the daughter but econtra Father or Mother are not next to whom administration shall be granted and land shall escheate rather then it shall goe to Father or Mother Resolved often against 5. E. 6. that the Father or Mother are next to whom administration may be granted and Littleton says that the Father is neerer of blood then the Uncle and therefore the Father shall have a remainder limitted to the next of blood of the Sonne but he shall not have an inheritance by discent from the Sonne for a Maxime prohibits it And 't was said at barre if he in reversion had been brother of the halfe blood he might have entered as Proximus de sanguine yet none of the halfe blood could inherit See the Booke at large where is excellent learning of discents as also the learning of Possessio fratris c. Resolved by the Court that it doth not come in question who shall enter for the forfeiture by the Statute for the issue was joyned upon a collaterall point whether the Mother had the custody at the time of the contract and the finding of the Jury is not materiall and therefore though the Plaintiffe who was lessee of the husband of the damsell as appeared had good title against the defendant being lessee of the husband of the other Sister yet because the issue was found against him judgement was given Quod nihil capiat c. Boytons case 35. Eliz. in Banco regis fo 43. A Writ of cap ad satisfaciendum is retornable at Westminster die Lunae prox post Crastin Animarū the partie is arrested the Sheriffe is not bound to bring the prisoner in recta Linea from the place where he was arrested or from the Countie But if he have the prisoner in Court at the day of the returne being never out of his custody in the meane season it is good But if a Sheriffe or a Bayliffe assent that one who is in execution and under their custody to goe out of the Gaole for a time and then to returne yet although he returne at the time it is an escape And so it is likewise if a Sheriffe suffer him to goe with a Bayliffe or a Keeper for the Sheriffe ought to have him in arcta custodia the Statute of Westminster 2. cap. 11. says Quod carceri manucipentur in ferris So as the Sheriffe may keepe him in yron and fetters to the intent that they may sooner satisfie their Creditors The Sheriffe upon a Habeas corpus for one in execution may bring the partie what way he will so as he have his bodie at the day according to the Writ If one in execution escape out of the Gaole and fly into another Countie the Sheriffe upon fresh suite taketh him again before any action brought against the Sheriffe the Judges have adjudged this no escape and if one in execution escape de son tort and be taken againe he shall never have an audita querela because a man shall not take advantage of his own wrong Sir George Brownes case 36. of the Queene fo 50. ISsue in speciall taile the remainder to himselfe in fee in the life of his Mother tenant in speciall taile levies a Fine in truth with Proclamations though they were not found to Sir G. B. the Mother living the Sonne leased for three lives
a Stranger be not in another part of the House but this was before 39. Eliz. cap. 15. whereby clergy is taken away without putting any feare if he rob any man of above the value of five shillings Accessory before in robbing a House in the day is ousted of Clergy by 4. 5. Phiâ— Mary Accessory in robbing a Booth in the night or day or out House upon 39. Eliz. shall have his Clergy Nota Although a Statute takes away Clergy from the principall yet the accessory before or after shall have it and where by statute for any offence a man is ousted of his Clergy the indictment must containe the offence with the circumstances in the Statute Dyer 99. and 183. And A. P. was ordered to be hanged in Chaines c. Metcalfs Case 12. Jacobi fol. 38. In Accompt IUdgement is given against M. Quod computet ideo in misericordia quia prius non computavit and before finall Judgement Error is brought 1. Resol It lyeth not 1. Because the Writ of Error saith Si juditium inde redditum sit which shall be intended of the principall Judgement as the Feast of St. M. shall be intended the principall Feast and the Feme shall be received upon default of her Baron after judgement of admeasurement before the principall judgement 2. It shall be intended an intire judgement therfore in an action against two if one plead to the issue and the other confesseth and judgement given against him he shall not have error before the Plea determined against the other for otherwise there would be a failer of right for the Kings Bench cannot proceed upon the Record nor the Common place because it is removed 3. The first judgement is not ad grave damnum for by that he looseth nothing but judgement of the arrearages and damages is the end of the originall 4. This is not properly a Judgement but an Award of the Court as ouster of ayde in partitione facienda an awarde quod partitio fiat c. which are but interlocutory and not definitive 5. They have day by the Roll untill the last judgment but if a Felon dye after the exigent awarded and before attainder a Writ of Error lyeth for necessity for otherwise his goods are forfeited by awarding of the exigent without remedy if diverse are sued by severall Praecipes and Judgement given against one he shall have error before judgement given against the other and if error be in the originall the tenor onely shall be certified for otherwise the Court cannot proceede against the others 2. It was Resolved That the Record is not removed because untill finall Judgement be given the Chiefe Justice of the Common place hath no authority to send it and they may proceed notwithstanding the Roll be marked Mittitur Richard Godfreys Case 12. Jacobi fol. 42. TWelve chiefe pledges according to the custome of the Mannor to present at the Leet that every one of themselves ought to pay for themselves 10 s. pro certo letae the Stewart imposeth a Fine of 6 l. upon them the Lord distreineth for the Fine and certainty of Leet one of the pledges brings Replevin and judgement was given for the Plaintiffe 1. Resol The Fine is not well assessed for it ought to be severall and not joynt as it is because the offence is severall and although that the offence be joynt yet the Fine shall be severall as in disseisin and trespasse But for the incertainty of the persons and infinitenesse of the number many may be fined together as a Towne for the escape of a Felon and the reasonablenesse and excessivenesse of the Fine shall be determined by the Judges Excessus in re qualibet jure reprobatur communi as excessive distresse excessive ayde and excessive amerciament are against the Common Law 2. If the Fine be imposed erroneously it may be avoyded by Plea for he had no other remedy 3. The Lord cannot distraine pro certo Letae without prescription because it is against common right but he may for a Fine or amercement but for an amercement in a Court Baron the Lord must prescribe a Fine because it is assessed by the Court needs not to be affered but an amercement must be affered by the Countrey 4 Admitting that he may distraine pro certo Letae he shall have a returne although hee had not cause to distraine for the Fine for where one brings an Action for two things and it will not lie for one of them it shall abate onely for that if he cannot have a better action for it but if he may it shall abate for the whole as in a Formedon of Land and of an advowson the Writ shall stand for the Land so if a man avow for diverse Rents arreare and it appeareth that parcell is not yet due yet the avowry is good for the residue but if a man bring a Writ of Entry in nature of an Assize of two Acres where it appeareth that for one Acre he ought to have a Writ of Entry in the per there all shall abate for this extends not to the action but to the Writ onely Richard Lifords Case 12. Jacobi fol 46. IN trespasse the Defendant pleads that J. L. was seized in fee and demised to T. S. and M. P. excepting Trees above twenty one yeares growth if not decayed for their lives and covenanted to stand seized de tenementis predictis cum pertinentijs superius dimissis to the use of R. L. in taile c. and the Defendant as Servant to the sayd R. L. entered and sold Trees and Judgement was given against the Plaintiffe 1. Resol That the Trees notwithstanding the exception remaine parcell of the inheritance and are not Chattels but shall descend to the Heire for the Law doth not favour severance of the Trees from the Land therefore if one bargaine and sell Land upon which there are Trees they shall not passe without inrolement 2. If there had not been such an exception the generall interest of them is in the Lessor and the Lessee had but a particular interest in them and the Lessor may sell them without license of the Lessee to take effect after the Lease determined and tithes shall not be payd for them because they are parcell of the inheritance 2. By the exception of them the soile is not excepted but onely so much as sustaineth the Tree and if he by licence of the lessee root them up the lessee shall have the soile but by exception of Wood the Land it selfe is excepted if an Acre or an advowson be severed from the Mannor by exception upon a Lease for life it shall not be parcell of the Mannor againe otherwise of trees for they were not severed in facto because they grow out of the Land 3. A thing in possession cannot be parcell of a reversion upon an estate for life but Trees which grow out of the Land and Fish or Deer in the Land may and shall passe with it
4. In this Case by grant of the reversion generally or of the Tenements the Trees passe for the inheritance of all the Land passeth and thereby the Trees annexed to it the disseisee by his entry shall have the Corne upon the ground as well as the Grasse by relation of continuance of possession but this relation is not of effect to have a trespasse against any but the first disseisor for in fictione juris semper aequitas existit and the emblements shall be recovered in damages 5. In the Case at Barr by exception of the Trees power is reserved to the lessor or his servants to enter and show the Trees to the Vendee Cuicunque aliquis quid concedit concedere videtur id c. 6. The plea in Barr is insufficient for he showeth that there was another joyntenant for life not named in the Writ and demands Judgement if action which is an unapt conclusion 2. The Plea is double one to the Writ another to the Action 3. He pleads the entry of the lessees for life which is surplusage 4. Hee averreth not that the Trees which were sold were nor Dotards which are excluded out of the exception but that they de jure pertinebant to R. L. which is not formall but upon all the matter there appeared sufficient cause to give Judgement against the Plaintiffe and therefore by the rule of the Court Quaerens nil capiat per billam The Case of the Taylors of Cloaths c. of Ipswich 12. Jacobi fol. 53. THe Taylors of I. make an Ordinance that none shall exercise the Trade in I. if he have not been an Apprentice for seven yeares and if hee doe not appeare before them to be approved upon forfeiture of five Marks and for breach of it bring debt the Defendant pleads that he was reteined by A. P. to be a domestick Servant and that he made Garments by his command 1. Resol At the Common Law none may be prohibited to exercise any Trade although he hath never been an Apprentice and be ignorant but if he misdoe any thing an action of the Case lyeth 2. This Ordinance for so much as is not prohibited by the Statute of 5. Eliz. is against Law for after seven yeares Apprentiship he may exercise his Trade without allowance of any 3. The Statute of 5. Eliz. doth not prohibite the private exercise of any Trade in a Family therefore this is out of the said Ordinance 4. The Statute of 19. H. 7. cap. 7. doth not corroborate any Ordinance against Law if it be allowed but the allowance dischargeth the penalty of 40 l. for putting in use any ordinances which are against the Prerogative of the King or the common profit of the people and Judgement was given Quod querentes nil caperent per billam Edward Savells Case 12. Jacobi fol. 55. AN Ejectione firmae lyeth not of a Close but it must be of a certaine number of Acres and the nature of them must be shewed A Writ shall not abate for want of order Viz. Of a House before Land c. and judgement was stayed Benthams Case 12. Jacobi fol. 56. IF damages or costs are omitted or not well assessed by the Jury if the Plaintiffe release them he may have his judgement and it shall not for that be reversed Insufficient assessement of damages and no assessing is all one Doctor Fosters Case concerning Recusants 12. Jacobi fol. 56. AN Information was preferred against a Recusant by an Informer Tam pro domino rege quam pro seipso before the recusant was convicted for 220. l. that is 20. l. a Moneth for a 11. Moneths absence from the Church c. And judgement given against the Defendant 1. Resolved that he may be convicted to satisfie the Statute of 23. Eliz. in this same Suite and convicted shall be taken for attainted for he shall forfeit nothing before judgement 2. The Branch of distribution in the Act of 23. Eliz. extendeth as well to the clause of penalty for recusancy as to that of hearing or saying Masses for it is all one to say shall forfeite and shall forfeite to the King 2. Diverse acts of Parliament give the penalty to the King and yet after make a distribution thereof to another who will sue as 3. H. 6. cap. 3. 3. H. 7.3 3. He against whom judgement is given upon demurrer or default or otherwise is convicted within the Statute for he is attainted which implieth it for it is so found by the Judges so by the Statute of 8. H. 6. treble damages are given where a disseisin is found to be with force this extends to a judgement by Nihil dicit or default 4. The Statute of 28. Eliz. doth not take away the Statute of 23. which giveth liberty to the informer c. for 1. It is made for more speedy execution of it 2. It doth not alter the suite of the party but of the King and leaveth the Informer as he was before 3. The Act of 28. giveth not the penalty to any new person for it was given to the K. by 23. Eliz. 4. The Statute of 28. extends onely to Indictments and toucheth not informations 5. The Defendant is not within 28. Eliz. if he be not convicted at the suite of the K. Ergo this is left as before 6. Because the Statute is in the affirmative and they may stand together but the Statute of 28. alters the Statute of 23 in this that it confineth Suites against Recusants in the K. Bench or Assizes c. which clause extends as well to the suite of the informer as of the Queene and the Statute of 35. Eliz. and 3. Jacobi inlarge the Jurisdiction as to Suites of the K. and touch not the suite of the party 5. The Statute of 35. taketh not away the Action popular given by 23. for it was made to give more speedy remedy and not to take it away a feme Covert is within the Statute of 23. and 1. Eliz. but before the Statute 35. Eliz. if a Feme Covert had been indicted of recusancy the forfeiture should not have been levyed of the goods of the Husband because he was not party thereunto otherwise in an Information or Debt brought by the informer and in that that the Statute of 35. is that the K. shall recover all the paines c. in such sort c. this alters the remedy onely as to the Queene for now shee may proceede by action as for recovery of any other Debt by the Common Law in such manner as 1. H. 7. c. 1. giveth a Formedon against Parnor of the profits c. also 35. Eliz. is in the affirmative and although it giveth the penalty of 20. l. by the Moneth yet it taketh not away 1. Eliz. which giveth 12. d. for every Sonday and Holy day and where this Statute saith that the conviction shall be in the K. B. or at the Assizes yet the Justices of Peace and others authorized by 23. may take