Selected quad for the lemma: land_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
land_n aforesaid_a manor_n seize_v 1,923 5 10.3349 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
B04487 An impartial collection of the great affairs of state. From the beginning of the Scotch rebellion in the year MDCXXXIX. To the murther of King Charles I. Wherein the first occasions, and the whole series of the late troubles in England, Scotland & Ireland, are faithfully represented. Taken from authentic records, and methodically digested. / By John Nalson, LL: D. Vol. II. Published by His Majesty's special command.; Impartial collection of the great affairs of state. Vol. 2 Nalson, John, 1638?-1686. 1683 (1683) Wing N107; ESTC R188611 1,225,761 974

There are 9 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

Repairing the High-ways Bridges and Twenty Pounds yearly to the Poor as is aforesaid But over and besides the said yearly Revenues before mentioned the said Dean and Chapter of Gloucester although but of the last Foundation and one of the least Revenues in this Kingdom yet they have Eighteen goodly Mannors and also divers other Lands Tenements and Heriditaments besides the Mannors Houses and Premises the old Rent of Assize of one of the said Mannors being 80 Pound per annum out of which Mannors and Lands the said Cathedral being to be made a Parochial Church 200 Pound per annum or more may be allowed for a Learned Preaching Minister there and a Hundred Pound a year apiece for two such others to assist him which in few years one of the said Mannors will discharge and also sufficiently Repair the said Cathedral Church and then the rest of the said Mannors and Lands may be employed to other Godly Pious or Charitable uses as the Wisdom of the King and Parliament shall think fit and suitable to this but in a more ample proportion of maintenance will be the allowances of all other Deanaries in England Again this I conceive will answer another Objection raised by a Worthy Knight at the Bar touching the Poverty of the Clergy of England if this Bill should take effect surely my Opinion is quite contrary and to that purpose I call to mind the saying of a Learned Divine Chaplain to a Nobleman upon some Conference with him of our wished desire to remove Scandalous Ministers and to reduce the Impropriations of Bishops and Deans and Chapters to a Preaching Ministry if these things said he take effect the Universities will not be able to supply the Churches and surely Sir if these things take effect I am confident we shall be so far from having a Poor beggerly Clergy as that no Kingdom in the Christian World will have a more Rich and Flourishing Clergy both for Nurseries and Incouragements of Learning and for their maintenance in more plentiful manner then it is at this present Please you therefore to put the Question I am ready to give my aid thereunto Whereupon it was Debated and strongly Urged by the Faction That there should from henceforth be no more Deans and Chapiters Chancellors or Commissaries Arch-Deacons Deans Prebendaries Chanters Canons or Petty Canons or any other their Officers within this Church or Kingdom and that all Lands and Revenues belonging to them should be taken away and disposed of to the advancement of Learning and Piety and that such of them as have no other subsistence but those Places and not Delinquents should have a Competent allowance for the term of their Lives Thus did they cover their Covetous Designs of Devouring the Church Revenues with the specious pretences of advancing Learning and Piety But the Event proved their Hypocrisie for when they had taken these Lands from the Legal Possessors of them Piety and Learning found so little a share of the Booty that even their own Hirelings of the Presbytery who had assisted them with their mercenary Lungs to Rob the Church were so far from getting any thing by it that with much to do they Escaped having their own Skins their Tithes and Glebe pulled over their Ears making good the Apologue of the Lion and his Fellow Huntsmen by their Folly and Indiscretion not to call it Rapine and Sacriledg The House of Commons was this Day wholly taken up with the further Examination of Col. Goring about the matter of the Army Wednesday June 16. Upon reading of a Petition of the Inhabitants of St. Saviours Southwark complaining against William Sonyter William Shepheard The Lords Order about those who committed the disorders at St. Saviours and St. Olavis Southwark Toby Gratwick Hugh Barcock George Ewer George Pitcher Thomas Loe c. for their pressing into the Church of the said Parish and violent breaking and pulling down the Railes about the Communion Table in an Insolent and Tumultuous manner the Parties complained of were brought to the Barr and their Council were admitted to speak for them and after a full hearing of both Parties and several Witnesses Examined on either side it did appear unto the House that the said Parties were guilty of the said Complaints laid against them in the Petition Thereupon it is Ordered That new Railes shall be forthwith set up by the appointment of the Churchwardens of the said Parish about the Communion Table in the same manner as they have been for the space of Fifty Years last past but not as they were for four or five Years last past and this to be done at the Costs and Charges of the abovesaid Delinquents And further That they shall make a Publick Acknowledgment of their faults in the Body of the Church upon a Sabbath Day when the Congregation shall be present And lastly That they shall stand Committed to the Fleet during the Pleasure of this House Also upon reading of the Petition of the Minister and the Inhabitants of St. Olaves Parish in Southwark against Robert Wainman George Bonace Hugh Evans and John Moor for making and causing to be made a great Tumult and Disorder in the Church of the said Parish in the time of the Administration of the Blessed Sacrament and for the hinderance of the performing of the same and for the great abuse of the Minister that administred the same and for using irreverent speeches when the said Duty was performing the Parties aforesaid were brought to the Barr and admitted to speak for themselves and after a full hearing of both sides and Witnesses Examined it appeared to the House that the said Parties complained of were guilty of the Complaints laid against them Whereupon the House did think fit and Ordered That the said Robert Wainman and George Bonace for their said Offences shall stand committed unto the Prison of the Kings-Bench forthwith and there to continue for the space of Six Months without Bail or Mainprize And that they shall stand upon a High Stool in Cheapside and Southwark for two hours together upon two Market-Dayes and acknowledg their Faults publiquely And lastly That they shall pay 20 l. Fine to his Majesty and to be bound to their good Behaviour And it is further Ordered That the said Hugh Evans and John Moor shall forthwith stand Committed to the Kings-Bench until they find Sureties to answer at the next Assizes to be kept for the County of Surrey their Faults and Offences in the disturbing and hindering the Administration of the blessed Sacrament who are there to be proceeded against according to Law And that Robert Osbalston Gent. and Richard Cant shall enter into Recognizance before Sir John Lenthall Knight one of his Majesties Justices of the Peace for the County of Surrey to appear at the next Assizes and prosecute against the said Hugh Evans and John Moore for their Offences aforesaid The State of the Accounts of the English and Scottish Armies were brought into
Clergy-man no Dignitary whose Books have cost him a Thousand Pounds which when he dies may be worth to his Wife and Children about Two Hundred It will be a shameful reproach to so flourishing a Kingdom as this to have a poor beggarly Clergy For my part I think nothing too much nothing too good for a good Minister a good Clergy-man They ought least to want who best know how to abound Burning and shining Lights do well deserve to be set in good Candlesticks Mr. Hide I am as much for Reformation for purging and maintaining Religion as any man whatsoever but I profess I am not for Innovation Demolition nor Abolition Possibly the Reader will now be desirous to see this Bill which gave so much business to the Parliament and therefore I here present him with a Copy of it as I find it in the Paper-Office An Act for the Abolishing and taking away of all Arch-Bishops Bishops their Chancellours and Commissaries Deans Deacons and Chanters Arch-Deacons Prebendaries and Canons and all other their Under-Officers of the Church of England WHereas the Government of the Church of England by Arch-Bishops and Bishops The Bill against Episcopal Government and the Hierarchy of the Church their Chancellors and Commissaries Deans Arch-Deacons and others their Cathedral Officers have been found by lang experience to be a great Impediment to the perfect Reformation and Growth of Religion prejudicial to the Civ●l Government of this Kingdom Be it therefore Enacted by the King 's most excellent Majesty the Lords and Commons Assembled in this present Parliament by the Authority of the same That from henceforth there shall be no Arch-Bishops Chancellors or Commissaries of any Bishopricks Deans Deans and Chapters Arch-Deacons Prebendaries Chanters Canons or Pety-Canons or any other of their Officers within this Church or Kingdom And every Parson that shall hereafter use or exercise any Power Iurisdiction Office or Authority Ecclesiastical or Civil by Collection of any such Name Title Dignity or Office or Iurisdiction to incur the Penalty and a Forfeiture contained in the Act of Premunires made in the 16 R. 2. That all which hereafter done by any Arch-Bishopricks their Chancellors Commissaries Deans Deans and Chapters Arch-Deacons Prevendaries Canons Petty-Canons or any other Office by Collection of any of their Dignities or Officers aforesaid shall be meérly void in Law any Statute or Ordinance heretofore made to the contrary any wise notwithstanding And that all Mannors Lands Territories Impropriations Houses Rents Services and other Hereditaments whatsoever of the said Arch-Bishopricks Deans Deans and Chapters Arch-Deacons Prebendaries Canons Petty-Canons which they or any of them have in Right of the said Churches or Dignities shall be disposed and ordered of in such manner sort and form as the King 's most excellent Majesty the Lords Temporal and Commons in this present Parliament Assembled shall appoint And be it further Enacted by the Authority aforesaid That all Ecclesiastical Iurisdiction fit to be exercised within this Church and Kingdom of England shall be committed to such a number of Persons and in such manner as by this present Parliament appointed Divers Papers were upon this occasion presented to the Consideration of the House of Commons and many even of the Presbyterians who were for altering some things yet were not for Extirpation of Root and Branch among the rest I find these two in the Paper-Office THe Agitation of change of Government in the Church A Proposition concerning Bishops and Ecclesiastical Affairs and Church Government in the House of Commons is a Business of so high a Consequence that it is necessary to prevent any Resolution by Voting their judgment alone lest that being brought up with prejudice to the Lords who are and ought to be equally interessed may also prejudice the Cause It is a doubtful Case in the heat of this dispute how farr the Commons may go in the Declaration of their Opinions in which if the Lords shall not concur it may prove a great Rock of offence between the two Houses Therefore 't is very requisite that the Lords of the Higher House do timely interest themselves in the discussion and before any Resolution in either House To this purpose the Lords may be pleased to make a Committee in their House for the Reformation of Church Affairs and Government and thereupon demand a Conference with the Committee of the House of Commons that the business may be handled by Consultation on both sides pari passu and gradu At this Conference the Lords may be pleased to propose these grounds 1. That neither by Example nor Reason in any Age or State Matters Ecclesiastical or Mutations in Church Affairs were ever alone determined by Lay-men 2. In the Primitive Church and most Ancient times matters of this nature were always debated in General Councils or National Synods in the blessed Reformation the business was agitated by a Choice number of Divines who communicated their proceeding with Reformed Divines abroad and admitted some Strangers into their Consultations for the satisfaction of their Brethren and Peace of the Church 3. The publick Enemy of our Religion will take infinite advantage at every Alteration and especially at any that shall be resolved above by Lay-men 4. It must of necessity produce a dangerous Schism in the Church if without all Respect of Edification and satisfaction to the Parties different in judgment any conclusion should be imposed upon both without their consent 5. It is impossible that any Resolution taken in Heat and Passion can be so permanent but that time will discover a Necessity of fresh alterations to the shame of the whole Reformation 6. It is necessary to proceed in such a way as may not be Scandalous to the Churches abroad and may give satisfaction to both Parties opposite and contending at Home and may be Honourable Durable Obliging and Fortified with the consent and agreement of the Ecclesiastick and the Authority of the Parliament To effect which it is most agreeable to true Wisdom and Policy that both Houses of Parliament determine and declare for the present that the Laws Established for Church Government shall be obeyed And because all things in the first Reformation could not be fore-seen or some things were necessarily for other respects overseen which Time and great Liberty and Light have discovered and which may now be more fitly taken into consideration That therefore both Houses may be pleased to move His Majesty for the calling of a National Synod I mean of a Select number of Divines of all three Nations subject to His Majesty equally and impartially chosen of Moderate and Learned Men of both sides in which may be discussed and resolved a setled and uniform Model of Government to be presented unto the Parliament of all the Kingdoms there to receive Strength and Approbation In which Assembly Godly Men and lovers of Peace assisted by the Spirit of God may doubtlessly be induced to receive satisfaction from one another in
between the Chair of State and the Lord Keeper's Woolsack and the House of Commons with their Speaker being come up the Clerk of the Parliament delivered the Commission whereunto the Bills were annexed upon his knee Then the Lord Privy-Seal declared to both Houses that his Majesty had an intent to have come himself this Day to have given his Royal Assent to these two Bills but some important Occasions had prevented him and so his Majesty had granted a Commission for giving the Royal Assent which was delivered to the Clerk of the Parliament who carried it to his Table and read it this being done the Clerk of the Crown read the Titles of the Bills and the Clerk of the Parliament pronounced the Royal Assent to them both severally The Bill of Attainder was as follows WHereas the Knights Citizens The Bill of Attainder against the Earl of Strafford passed May the 10th and Burgesses of the House of Commons in this present Parliament assembled have in the name of themselves and of all the Commons of England impeached Thomas Earl of Strafford of High-Treason for endeavouring to subvert the ancient and Fundamental Laws and Government of his Majesties Realms of England and Ireland and to introduce an Arbitrary and Tyrannical Government against Law in the said Kingdoms and for exercising a Tyrannous and exorbitant power over and against the Laws of the said Kingdoms over the Liberties Estates and Lives of his Majesties Subjects and likewise for having by his own Authority commanded the laying and asseising of Soldiers upon his Majesties Subjects in Ireland against their consents to compel them to obey his unlawful Commands and Orders made upon Paper-Petitions in causes between Party and Party which accordingly was executed upon divers of his Majesties Subjects in a Warlike manner within the said Realm of Ireland and in so doing did levy War against the Kings Majesty and his liege people in that Kingdom And also for that he upon the unhappy Dissolution of the last Parliament did slander the House of Commons to his Majesty and did counsel and advise his Majesty that he was loose and absolved from the rules of Government and that he had an Army in Ireland by which he might reduce this Kingdom for which he deserves to undergo the pains and forfeitures of High-Treason And the said Earl hath been also an incendiary of the Wars between the two Kingdoms of England and Scotland all which offences have been sufficiently proved against the said Earl upon his impeachment Be it therefore enacted by the Kings most excellent Majesty and by the Lords and Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by authority of the same That the said Earl of Strafford for the haynous crimes and offences aforesaid stand and be adjudged and attainted of High-Treason and shall suffer such pain of Death and incur the forfeitures of his Goods and Chattels Lands Tenements and Hereditaments of any estate of Free-hold or Inheritance in the said Kingdoms of England and Ireland which the said Earl or any other to his use or in trust for him have or had the day of the first sitting of this present Parliament or at any time since Provided that no Judge or Judges Justice or Justices whatsoever shall adjudge or interpret any Act or thing to be Treason nor in any other manner than he or they should or ought to have done before the making of this Act and as if this Act had never been had or made Saving alwayes unto all and singular persons and bodies politick and corporal their Heirs and Successors others than the said Earl and his Heirs and such as claim by from or under him all such right title and interest of in and to all and singular such of the said Lands Tenements and Hereditaments as he they or any of them had before the first day of this present Parliament any thing herein contained to the contrary notwithstanding Provided that the passing of this present Act and his Majesties Assent thereunto shall not be any determination of this present Sessions of Parliament but that this present Sessions of Parliament and all Bills and matter whatsoever depending in Parliament and not fully enacted or determined And all Statutes and Acts of Parliament which have their continuance until the end of this present Session of Parliament shall remain continue and be in full force as if this Act had not been The Earl understanding that the Bill was passed did humbly Petition the House as follows SEeing it is the good Will and Pleasure of God The Earl of Strafford's Petition to the House of Peers that your Petitioner is now shortly to pay that Duty which we all owe to our frail Nature he shall in all Christian Patience and Charity conform and submit himself to your Justice in a comfortable assurance of the great hope laid up for us in the Mercy and Merits of our Saviour blessed for ever only he humbly craves to return your Lordships most humble thanks for your Noble Compassion towards those innocent Children whom now with his last blessing he must commit to the protection of Almighty God beseeching your Lordships to finish his Pious intention towards them and desiring that the Reward thereof may be fulfilled in you by him that is able to give above all that we are able ask or think wherein I trust the Honourable House of Commons will afford their Christian Assistance And so beseeching your Lordships charitably to forgive all his Omissions and infirmities he doth very heartily and truely recommend your Lordships to the Mercies of our Heavenly Father and that for his goodness he may perfect you in every good work Amen The next day being Tuesday May 11. Tuesday May 11. the King sent this Passionate Letter to the Lords in behalf of the Earl My Lords I Did yesterday satisfie the Justice of the Kingdom The Kings Letter to the Lords concerning the E. of Strafford by passing the Bill of Attainder against the Earl of Strafford but Mercy being as inherent and inseperable to a King as Justice I desire at this time in some measure to shew that likewise by suffering that unfortunate Man to fulfil the Natural Course of his Life in a Close Imprisonment Yet so if ever he make the least offer to escape or offer directly or indirectly to meddle in any sort of publick business especially with me either by Message or Letter it shall cost him his Life without further Process This if it may be done without the Discontentment of my People will be an unspeakable contentment to me to which end as in the first place I by this Letter do earnestly desire your Approbation and to endear it more have chosen him to carry it that of all your House is most dear to me So I desire that by a Conference you will endeavour to give the House of Commons Contentment assuring you that the Exercise of Mercy is no more pleasing to me than to see
Michaelmas-Term in the said fourth Year of His Majesties Reign His Majesties then Attorney General exhibited an Information by English Bill in the Exchequer against the said Samuel Vassal setting forth that King James by his Letters-Patents dated Tertio Novembr in the second Year of His Reign did command the said Imposition of five Shillings six Pence upon every hundred weight of Currants should be demanded and received And that His Majesty that now is by His Letters-Patents dated the six and twentieth Day of July in the second Year of His Reign did by advice of his Privy-Councel declare his Will and Pleasure to be That Subsidies Customs and Impost should be levyed in such manner as they were in the Time of King James and the same and the Farmers thereof to continue until it might receive a setling by Parliament and commanded the levying and receiving the same accordingly and that the said Samuel Vassal before the first Day of October then last before the said Information exhibited did bring into the Port of London in Ships four Thousand six Hundred thirty eight Hundred Weight of Currants Richard Carmarthen Surveyor in the said Port of London the said first Day of October demanded of the said Samuel Vassal the said Imposition of five Shillings six Pence for every hundred Weight of the said Currants and that the said Samuel Vassal refused to pay the said Imposition and unjustly detained it from the King To which Information the said Samuel Vassal appeared and pleaded the Statute of Magna Charta and the Statute of de Tallagio non concedendo and that he was a Subject born under the Kings Allegiance and a Merchant of London using that Trade and that the said Summ of five Shillings six Pence upon every hundred Weight of Currants was and is malum talentum and not antiqua seu recta consuetudo and that it was imposed without Assent of Parliament to which Plea the said Attorney General demurred in Law and the said Samuel Vassal joyned in Demurrer with him and when the said Cause came to be argued viz. in Trinity Term in the sixth Year of His Majesties Reign the said Sir Humphrey Davenport being then Lord Chief Baron of His Majesties said Court of Exchequer did contrary to his Oath and contrary to the Laws of this Realm and to the great impoverishment of the said Samuel Vassal publickly deny to hear the Councel of the said Samuel Vassal to argue for him and said that the Case of the said Samuel Vassal would fall under the same Rule with the Case of one Bates and therefore was already judged and when the Councel of the said Samuel Vassal answering that they had nothing to do with Bates his Case but desired to argue for Master Vassall the said Sir Humphrey Davenport replyed that they knew the Opinion of the Court and should be heard no further and said that the King was in Possession and that they meaning the said Court of Exchequer would keep him in Possession And the said Sir Humphrey Davenport shortly after did together with the rest of the then Barons of the said Court of Exchequer imprison the said Samuel Vassal for not paying such Summs of Money as were pretended by the said Officers of the Custom-House to be due to His Majesty and did delay the said Samuel Vassal from time to time from having restitution of his said Goods being often in Court moved thereto with intention to force the said Samuel Vassal to pay the said unlawful Imposition and did also give his Opinion and Judgment upon the said Information for the King and against the said Samuel Vassal and by several Orders for that purpose made did continue the Possession of the said Goods in the King and the said Samuel Vassal could never obtain any restitution at all of his said Goods 1. That whereas it was commanded to the Sheriff of the County of York by Writ under the Seal of His Majesties Court of Exchequer dated the sixteenth Day of May in the seventh Year of His Majesties Reign that now is That he should destrain James Maleverer Esquire to appear before the Barons of his Majesties said Court of Exchequer in the Octaves of the Holy Trinity then next following to make fine to the King for his Trespass and Contempt in not coming to the Presence of the King before the one and thirtieth Day of January in the first Year of his said Majesties Reign to take upon him the Order of Knighthood according to the Form of a Proclamation in that behalf formerly made at which Day of the said Octaves of the Holy Trinity the said James Maleverer did appear and pleaded to the said Writs that although His said Majesty the said one and thirtieth Day of January and for three Days next before the said one and thirtieth Day of January was resident and remaining at his Pallace at White-Hall in the County of Middlesex and that the said James Maleverer the said one and thirtieth Day of January and three Days next before the said one and thirtieth Day of January was resident and remaining at Ancliff in the said County of York which is distant from the said Pallace of White-Hall the space of one Hundred and fourscore Miles and that the said James Maleverer the said one and thirtieth Day of January aforesaid or at any time before had no Lands nor Rents in his own Hands or in the Hands of Feoffees to his use out of the said County of York and that that part of the said County of York which is nearest to the said Pallace of White-Hall is distant from the said Pallace of White-Hall the space of one hundred and thirty Miles and that no Proclamation by vertue of any Writ of Proclamation for the appearance of any Persons whatsoever to take the said Order of Knighthood was made in any Part of the said County of York before the thirtieth Day of January in the said first Year of His Majesties Reign by reason whereof the said James Maleverer could not personally come to the Presence of His said Majesty to take the said Order of Knighthood before the said one and thirtieth Day of January in the said first Year of His Majesties said Reign yet the said James Maleverer for his Fine in the Premisses did humbly submit himself to the said Court and demanded to be discharged of the said Issues returned and imposed upon him by reason of the Premisses yet notwithstanding the said Plea and Submission of the said James Maleverer and after the same was made as aforesaid and entred upon Record in His Majesties said Court of Exchequer and the said Court moved for stay of the Process and discharge of the Issues the said Sir Humphrey Davenport being then Lord Chief Baron of the said Court of Exchequer contrary to his Oath and contrary to the Laws of this Realm and to the great impoverishing of the said James Maleverer did together with the rest of the then Barons of the said
Court refuse to impose any Fine whatsoever upon the said James Maleverer and told him that the said Court had no Power to Fine him and that he must compound with certain Commissioners for that purpose appointed And did farther order and direct several other Writs of Distringas to issue forth of His Majesties said Court of Exchequer under the Seal of the said Court directed to the several High Sheriffs of the said County of York whereby the said Sheriffs were commanded further to distrain the said James Maleverer to appear as aforesaid upon which said Writs of Distringas several great and excessive Issues were returned upon the Lands of the said James Maleverer amounting to the Summ of two Thousand Pounds or thereabouts a great part whereof the said James Maleverer was inforced to pay and in like manner the said Sir Humphrey Davenport together with the rest of the then Barons of the said Court of Exchequer did order and direct such and the like unjust and undue Proceedings and the said Proceedings were had and made accordingly against Thomas Moyser Esquire and against several other Persons His Majesties Subjects in several Parts of this Realm to the utter undoing of many of them 2. That a Sentence of Degradation being given by the High Commissioners of the Province of York against Peter Smart Clerk one of the Prebends of the Church of Durham for a Sermon by him formerly Preached against some Innovations in the Church of Durham a Tryal was afterwards had viz. in August in the seventh Year of his said Majesties Reign before the said Sir Humphrey Davenport Knight then one of the Judges of Assizes and Nisi prius for the County Palatine of Durham concerning the Corps of the Prebend of the said Master Smart which was then pretended to be void by the said Sentence of Degradation the said Sir Humphrey Davenport contrary to his Oath and contrary to the Laws of this Realm and to the destruction of the said Master Smart upon reading the Writ de haeretico comburendo did publickly on the Bench in the presence of divers His Majesties Subjects then attending declare his Opinion to be That the said Prebends Place was void and gave directions to the Jury then at Bar to find accordingly and being then informed that although the said Master Smart had been dead or deprived yet the Profits of his Prebend had been due to his Executors till the Michaelmas following the said Sir Humphrey Davenport then answered That though the said Master Smart was not dead Yet if he had his desert he had been dead long ago for he deserved to have been hanged for the said Sermon and that he was as wicked a Man as any lived in the World call him no more Master Smart but plain Smart And when the said Jury had found against the said Master Smart the said Sir Humphrey Davenport in scandal of His Majesties Government and Justice and of the Proceedings of His Majesties Judges did publickly as aforesaid speak Words to this effect That the said Jury had well done and that the said Smart had no remedy save by appeal to the King and there he should find but cold Comfort for the King would not go against his own Prerogative upon which the Judges and High Commissioners did depend and therefore would not contradict one anothers Acts. That the said Sir Humphrey Davenport about the Month of November Anno Dom. 1635. then being Lord Chief Baron of his Majesties Court of Exchequer and having taken an Oath for the due Administration of Justice to His Majesties Liege People according to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm subscribed his Name to an Opinion in haec verba I am of Opinion That as where the benefit doth more particularly redound to the good of the Ports or Maritime Parts as in Case of Piracy or Depredations upon the Seas there the charge hath been and may be lawfully imposed upon them according to Presidents of former Times so where the good and safety of the Kingdom in general is concerned and the whole Kingdom in danger of which His Majesty is the only Judg there the Charge of the Defence ought to be borne by all the Realm in general this I hold agreeable both to Law and Reason That in or about the Month of February Anno Dom. 1636. the said Sir Humphrey Davenport then being Lord Chief Baron of the said Court of Exchequer subscribed an extrajudicial Opinion in Answer to Questions in a Letter from His Majesty ut supra in the Articles against Judge Bramston and Judge Berkley That whereas an Action of Battery was brought by one Richard Legge against Robert Hoblins to which the said Hoblins pleaded Justification de son assault de mesme and the said Cause came to Tryal at the Assizes holden for the County of Gloucester in Summer An. 1636. before the said Sir Humphrey Davenport then one of the Justices of Assize and Nisi prius for that County At the said Tryal the said Robert Hoblins did begin to make proof of his said Justification and produced one Robert Tilly a Witness in the Cause who proved upon Oath that the said Richard Legge did make the first Assault upon the said Robert Hoblins and that the occasion thereof was that the said Richard Legge and others came upon the Lands then in Possession of the said Hoblins and did take and drive away eighteen Cows of the said Hoblins pretending they had a Warrant from the Sheriff to distrain the same for forty Shillings assessed upon the said Hoblins for Ship-Money And when the said Hoblins being present endeavoured to hinder the said Legge and others from taking away his said Cattel the said Legge strook the said Hoblins with a Staff who after defended himself That upon the opening of the Matter the said Sir Humphrey Davenport would not suffer the said Hoblins to produce any more Witnesses on his behalf though the said Hoblins desired that other of his Witnesses then present and sworn might be heard nor his Councel to speak for him but being informed that the said Hoblins when Ship-Money was demanded of him answered that he would not pay the same because it was not granted by Parliament the said Sir Humphrey Davenport did then openly in the hearing of a great number of His Majesties Liege People then assembled and attending the Court in great Passion reprove the said Hoblins and told him that the King was not to call a Parliament to give him satisfaction and did then and there also falsly and of purpose to prevent His Majesties loving Subjects from the due and ordinary course of Law and contrary to his Oath and the Laws of the Realm Publish Declare and affirm that it was adjudged by all the Judges of England that Ship-money was due to the King and directed the Jury Sworn in that cause to find a Verdict for the said Richard Legge And the said Jury did accordingly and gave him twenty Pound damages And the said
his Opinion and Judgment upon the said Information for the King and against the said Samuel Vassall and by several Orders for that purpose did continue the possession of the said Goods in the King and the said Samuel Vassall could never obtain any restitution at all of the said Currants 4. Whereas it was commanded to the Sheriff of the County of York by Writ under the Seal of His Majesties Court of Exchequer Dated the sixteenth Day of May in the seventh year of His Majesties Reign that now is That he should distrain James Maleverer Esquire to appear before the Barons of His Majesties said Court of Exchequer in the Octaves of the Holy Trinity then next following to make fine to the King for his Trespass and Contempt in not coming to the presence of the King before the 31. Day of January in the first year of His said Majesties Reign to take upon him the Order of Knighthood according to the Form of a Proclamation in that behalf formerly made at which day of the said Octaves of the Holy Trinity the said James Maleverer did appear and Pleaded to the said Writ that although His said Majesty the said 31. Day of January and for three days next before the said 31. Day of January was resident and remaining at His Palace at White-Hall in the County of Middlesex and that the said James Maleverer the said 31. Day of January and three days next before the said one and thirtieth Day of January was resident and remaining at Ancliffe in the said County of York which is distant from the said Palace of White-Hall the space of one hundred and four-score Miles and that the said James Maleverer the said one and thirtieth Day of January aforesaid or at any time before had no Lands or Rents in his own hands or in the hands of Feoffees to his uses out of the said County of York and that that part of the said County of York which is nearest to the said Palace of White-Hall the space of one hundred and thirty Miles and that no Proclamation by vertue of any Writ or Proclamation for the appearance of any Persons whatsoever to take the said Order of Knighthood was made in any part of the said County of York before the thirtieth Day of January in the said first year of His Majesties Reign by reason whereof the said James Maleverer could not personally come to the presence of His said Majesty to take the said Order of Knighthood before the said one and thirtieth Day of January in the said first year of His said Majesties Reign yet the said James Maleverer for his Fine in the Premisses did humbly submit himself to the said Court and demanded to be discharged of the said Issues returned and imposed upon him by reason of the Premisses yet notwithstanding the said Plea and Submission of the said James Maleverer and after the same was made as aforesaid and entred upon Record in His Majesties said Court of Exchequer and the said Court moved for stay of the Process and discharge of the Issues the said Sir Thomas Trevor being then one of the Barons of the said Court of Exchequer contrary to his Oath and contrary to the Laws of this Realm and to the great Impoverishing the of said James Maleverer did together with the rest of the then Barons of the said Court refuse to Impose any Fine whatsoever upon the said James Malverer and told him that the said Court had no Power to Fine him and that the must Compound with certain Commissioners for that purpose appointed And did farther order and direct several other Writs of Distringas to Issue forth of His Majestie 's said Court of Exchequer under the Seal of the said Court directed to the several High Sheriffs of the said County of York whereby the said Sheriffs were commanded further to distrain the said James Maleverer to appear as aforesaid upon which said Writs of Distringas several great and excessive Issues were returned upon the Lands of the said James Maleverer amounting to the Summ of two thousand Pounds or thereabouts a great part whereof the said James Maleverer was enforced to pay and in like manner the said Sir Thomas Trevor together with the rest of the then Barons of the said Court of Exchequer did order and direct such and the like unjust and undue proceedings and the said proceedings were had and made accordingly against Thomas Moyser Esquire and against several other Persons His Majesties Subjects in several parts of this Realm to the utter undoing of many of them 5. That he the said Sir Thomas Trevor about the Month of November Anno Domini 1635. then being one of the Barons of His Majesties Court of Exchequer and having taken an Oath for the due Administration of Justice to His Majesties Liege People according to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm subscribed his Name to an Opinion in haec verba I am of Opinion c. ut suprà in Baron Davenport's Charge 6. That in or about the Month of February Anno Dom. 1636. the said Sir Thomas Trevor being then one of the Barons of the said Court of Exchequer subscribed an Extrajudicial Opinion in answer to Questions in a Letter from his Majesty in haec verba Charles R. When the Good and Safety of the Kingdom in general is Concerned c. ut suprà Subscribed ut priùs 7. That the said Sir Thomas Trevor being then one of the Barons of his Majesties Court of Exchequer did deliver his Opinion and Judgment in the Exchequer-Chamber against John Hampden Esq in the Case of Ship-Money That he the said John Hampden upon the matter and substance of the Case was chargeable with the Money then in question a Copy of which Proceedings and Judgment the Commons in this present Parliament have already delivered to your Lordships 8. That whereas in the Month of April 16 Caroli the Officers of the Custome-House having seised a Ship of one Samuel Warners laden with Tobacco being the Goods of the said Warner the Bulk of the said Ship not being broken and no Information exhibited for the King according to the course of the Exchequer for any Duty the Barons were moved that the said Ship might be restored to the Proprietor giving Security to pay such Duties as did belong to the King But upon the Allegation of the King's Attorney that there needed no Information because there was no Penalty the said Sir Thomas Trevor being then one of the Barons of His Majesties Court of Exchequer together with the rest of the then Barons of the said Court did contrary to his Oath and contrary to the Laws of this Realm deny the restitution of the said Ship unless all the Duties demanded by the Farmers of the Custom-House were first paid Hereupon the said Warner brought an Action of Trover upon the Case in the Office of Pleas in the Exchequer against the said Officers that seized his Ship and Goods whereupon the King's Attorney
Cohabit July 12. 1641. It was Resolved to pass as a Law Nemine Contradicente UPon Report this Day made unto the House from the Lords Committees for Petitions That William Walter was complained of by the Petition of Elizabeth Walter his Wife for refusing to Co-habit with her or allow her and her 3 Children Maintenance and Supportation for their Lively-hoods although he hath a Good and a Plentiful Estate It was thought fit and so ordered by the Lords in Parliament That the said William Walter shall settle Lands and Tenements cleared from all former Incumbrances other then Leases whereupon the usual Rent is reserved lying in the County of Pembroke upon such Trustees as the said Mrs. Walter shall Nominate to the use of her self and her said 3 Children during the time of her Life And Mr. Justice Foster and Mr Justice Heath's assistance to the said Lords Committees for Petitions are hereby desired by the Lords in Parliament to direct the Counsel of the said Mrs. Walter what security shall be taken in or out of the Premisses and how and in what manner an Estate of and in the Lands and Tenements or Tithes of the said William Walter shall be setled or charged and chargeable with the payment of sixty Pounds per An. to the use of the said Mrs. Walter and her 3 Children the first payment whereof to begin at Michaelmass next ensuing the Date hereof And in Case the said Mr. Walter 's Estate shall encrease by the Death of his Mother or Grandmother or otherwise it is their Lordships Pleasure that the Moiety of the same as it shall fall and accrew to him shall be settled and paid unto the said Feoffees to the use of the said Mrs. Walter and her 3 Children as aforesaid by the Advice of the Judges aforenamed And further that if the said William Walter shall refuse or delay by the space of a Month next ensuing to make such settlement in manner as aforesaid then it is their Lordships Pleasure that a Sequestration shall be awarded to such Person or Persons as the said Mrs. Walter shall nominate to take and receive so much of the Yearly Rent and Profits of the said Lands and Tenements of the said William Walter as shall amount to such proportions and allowances as aforesaid to be answered to the said Mrs. Walter or her Assigns half Yearly for the uses aforesaid UPon Report this Day made unto the House from the Lords Committees An Order of the Lords concerning a Vicaridge in Sir Peter Osborn's Case Plaintiff against Thomas Joyce Clerk July 12. 1641. for Petitions in the Cause of Sir Peter Osborn Knight Plaintiff and Thomas Joice Clerk it appeared unto their Lordships That Sir John Osborn Knight deceased Father of the said Sir Peter was seized in Fee of the Rectory of Hawnes in the County of Bedford to which the Advowson of the Vicaridge did consist only of eight Pounds per Ann. stipend That the said Sir John Osborn did in the 9th Year of King James convey the Inheritance of the said Rectory and Vicaridge together with a new House built upon his own Land to the now Bishop of Durham Sir Thomas Cheek and others for the Increase of Maintenance of such Vicar or Vicars as should be nominated by the said Sir John or his Heirs But before the Gift Sir John puts in Mr. Brightman and Mr. Wilson successively who injoyed the said House and Tythes and after the Gift nominated Mr. Sherley who was only Licensed by the Bishop but never Instituted or Inducted After the Death of the said Mr. Sherley the said Sir Peter Osborn nominated Mr. Buckley who was Licensed by the Bishop without being instituted or Inducted the Defendant Joyce obtains a Presentation by Lapse and gained a Decree in Chancery for the Rectory House and Tythes against which Decree Sir Peter Osborn objected that the Donor intended the said Rectory to him only that was to be nominated by himself or his Heirs and could not intend it to any that came in by Lapse it being then in Lapse when his Gift was made which was denied by the Defendant and affirmed that it was intended to the Incumbent whoever he was otherwise the Charity of the Donor would be overthrown Whereupon the Decree and Deed of the said Sir John Osborn was produced and read before the said Lords Committees who after long Debate by Councel on both Sides were fully satisfied That the Donor intended it to none but such as should come in by the Nomination of him or his Heirs Whereupon it is Ordered and Adjudged by the Lords in Parliament That the said Lay Fee Rectory and House together with all the said Donors Gift setled by the said Deed shall by virtue of this Order go to such Clergy-Man or Men as the said Sir Peter Osborne and his Heirs shall Nominate and Appoint according to the meaning of the said Donor and no other And that the Defendant Joyce that came into the vicaridge by Lapse shall have no Advantage of the Gift so made by Sir John Osborne but shall forthwith upon Notice hereof relinquish the same and shall also Answer to the Feoffees for all the Profits of the said House and Rectory by him taken ever since the said Decree and if the said Defendant Joyce conceives he hath any Right he is left to try the same at the Common Law without taking any advantage of the said Decree or of any thing done by Sir Peter Osborne in Obedience to the said Decree A Message was brought from the House of Commons by Sir Henry Vane Junior to desire that the Bill for Tonnage and Poundage may be delivered unto them to be brought up and presented by their Speaker with the Commission under the Great Seal annexed THeir Lordships taking this into Consideration Message from the Commons about the Bill of Tonage and Poundage and perusing the Commission found by the Tenor of the said Commission that the Bill of Tonnage and Poundage could not pass the Royal Assent by virtue of this Commission if they were separated therefore to avoid all Ambiguities Resolved to send some Lords to desire His Majesty would be pleased to come in Person to give the Royal Assent to the said Bill Hereupon the E. Bath E. Essex E. Cambridge E. Bristol Bill for Tonnage and Poundage passed the Royal Assent went presently to attend his Majesty therein who brought this Answer That the King will be here presently His Majesty being come and satt in the Chair of State the Commons were sent for who came and by their Speaker presented the Bill for Tonnage and Poundage then the Clerk of the Crown read the Title of the said Bill and the Clerk of the Parliament pronounced the Royal Assent thereunto in these words Le Roy remerciant ses bons Subjects accepte Leur Benevolence et ainsi le veult It was this day Ordered in the Commons House Munday July 12. Order for Aftornoon Sermons in all
Majesty's said Letters or the said Act of State and not otherwise The Commons not being satisfied with these Sober and Calm Resolutions of the Judges fell to Voting their own Sense and to make Declarations of the Law upon their former Queries as followeth Questions propounded in Parliament And Declarations of the Law thereupon in Parliament Quest 1. The Declaration of the Commons in Ireland upon the Queries propounded to the Judges WHether the Subjects of this Kingdom be a Free People and to be Governed only by the Common Laws of England and Statutes of Force in this Kingdom Declarat The Subjects of this his Majesties Kingdom of Ireland are a free People and to be Governed only according the Common Law of England and Statutes made and established by Parliament in this Kingdom of Ireland and according to the Lawful Customs used in the same 2. Quest Whether the Judges of this Land do take the Oath of Judges And if so Whether under pretext of any Act of State Proclamation Writ Letter or Direction under the Seal or Privy Seal Signet or Letter or other Commandment from the Lord Lieutenant Lord Deputy Justice Justices or other Chief Governor or Governors of this Kingdom they may hinder stay or delay the Suit of any Subject or his Judgment or Execution thereupon If so in what Cases And whether if they do hinder stay or delay such Suit or Judgment or Execution thereupon what Punishment do they incur for their deviation and transgression therein Declarat That Judges in Ireland ought to take the Oath of the Justices or Judges declared and established in several Parliaments of Force in this Kingdom and the said Judges or any of them by Color or under Pretext of any Act of State or Proclamation or under Color or Protext of any Writ Letter or Direction under the Great Seal Privy Seal or Privy Signet from the King 's Most Excellent Majesty or by Color or Pretext of any Letter or Commandment from the Chief Governor or Governors of this Kingdom ought not to hinder or delay the Suit of any Subject or his Judgment or Execution thereupon and if any Letters Writs or Commands come from his Majesty or from any other or for any other Cause to the Justices or to the other deputed to do the Law and right according to the Usage of the Realm in disturbance of the Law or of the Execution of the same or of Right to the Party the Justices and others aforesaid ought to proceed and hold their Courts and Processes where the Pleas and Matters be depending before them as if no such Letters Writs or Commandments were come to them And in case any Judge or Judges Justice or Justices be found in default therein he or they so found in default ought to incur and undergo due Punishment according to the Law and former Declarations and Provisions in Parliament in that Case made and of Force in this Kingdom or as shall be Ordered Adjudged or Declared in Parliament And the Barons of the Exchequer Justices of the Assize and Goal-delivery if they be found in default as aforesaid It is hereby declared That they ought to undergo the Punishment aforesaid 3. Quest Whether the Kings Majesties Privy Council either with the Chief Governor or Governors of this Kingdom or without him or them be a Place of Judicature by the Commons Laws and wherein Causes between Party and Party for Debts Trespasses Accompts Possessions or Title of Lands or any of them or which of them may be heard and determined and of what Civil Causes they have Jurisdiction and by what Law And of what Force is their Order or Decree in such Cases or any of them Declarat The Council Table of this Realm either with the Chief Governor or Governors or without the Chief Governor or Governors is no Judicatory wherein any Action Real Personal Popular or Mixt or any Suit in the Nature of the said Actions or any of them can or ought to be Commenced Heard or Determined and all Proceedings at the Council Table in any Suit in the nature of any of the said Actions are void especially Causes particularly provided for by express Acts of Parliament of Force in this Kingdom only excepted 4. Quest The Like of the Chief Governor alone Declarat The Proceedings before the Chief Governor or Governors alone in any Action Real Personal Popular or Mixt or in any Suit in the Nature of any of the said Actions are Coram non Judice and void 5. Quest Whether Grants of Monopolies be warranted by the Law and of what and in what Cases and how and where and by whom are the pretended Transgressors against such Grants punishable and whether by Fine Mutilation of Members Imprisonment Loss and Forfeiture of Goods or otherwise and which of them Declarat All Grants of Monopolies are contrary to the Laws of this Realm and therefore void and no Subject of the said Realm ought to be Fined Imprisoned or otherwise Punished for exercising or using the Lawful Liberty of a Subject contrary to such Grants 6. Quest In what Cases the Lord Lieutenant Lord Deputy or other Chief Governor or Governors of this Kingdom and Council may punish by Fine Imprisonment Mutilation of Members Pillory or otherwise And whether they may Sentence any to such the same or the like punishment for infringing the Commands of or concerning any Proclamation of and concerning Monopolies and what punishment do they incur that Vote for the same Declarat The Lord Lieutenant Lord Deputy or other Chief Governor or Governors and Council of this Realm or any of them ought not to imprison any of his Majesties Subjects but only in Cases where the Common Laws or Statutes of the Realm do inable and warrant them so to do and they ought not to Fine or to Consure any Subject in mutilation of Member standing on the Pillory or other shameful Punishment in any Case at the Council Table and no Subject ought to be Imprisoned Fined or otherwise Punished for Infringing any Commands or Proclamation for the support or Countenance of Monopolies and if in any Case any Person or Persons shall be committed by the Command or Warrant of the Chief Governor or Governors and Privy Council of this Realm or any of them That in every such Case every Person or Persons so Committed restrained of his or their Liberty or suffering Imprisonment upon Demand or Motion made by his or their Counsel or other imployed by him or them for that purpose unto the Judges of the Court of Kings-Bench or Common-Pleas in open Court shall without delay upon any Pretence whatsoever for the ordinary Fees usually paid for the same have forthwith granted unto him or them a Writ or Writs of Habeas Corpus to be directed generally unto all and every Sheriff Goaler Minister Officer or other Person in whose Custody the Party or Parties so Committed or Restrained shall be shall at the Return of the said Writ or Writs and
fruition of your future favours The fixion our Confidence in you before any other of the Peers and privy Councellors of the Kingdom doubleth this Obligation Your Lordship may therefore be pleased to acquaint the Lords Justices and Councel to be imparted unto his Sacred Majesty with our Grievances and the causes thereof the reading of which we most humbly pray and the manner of it First the Papists in the neighbouring Counties are severely puni●●ed and their miseries might serve as Beacons unto us to look unto our own when our Neighbours Houses are on fire And we and other Papists are and ever will be as loyal Subjects as any in the King's Dominions For manifestation whereof we send herein inclosed an Oath solemnly taken by us which as it received indelible Impression in our hearts shall be sign'd with our hand and seal'd with our Blood Secondly There is an incapacity in the Papists of Honour and the Immunities of true Subjects the royal Marks of distributive Justice and a disfavour in the Commutative which rais'd Strangers and Forreigners whose valour and vertue was invincible when the old Families of the English and the Major part of us the meer Irish ddi swim in blood to serve the Crown of England and when Offices should call Men of worth Men without Worth and merit obtain them Thirdly The Statute of the 2 Eliz. of force in this Kingdom against us and they of our Religion doth a little disanimate us and the rest Fourthly The avoidance of Grants of our Lands and Liberties by Quirks and Quiddities of the Law without reflecting upon the Kings Royal and real Intention for confirming our Estates his Broad Seal being the pawn betw●●t his Majesty and his people Fifthly The restraint of purchase in the meer Irish of Lands in the Escheated Counties and the taint and blemish of them and their posterities doth more discontent them than that plantation Rule for they are brought to that Exigent of poverty in these late times that they must be sellers and not buyers of Land And we conceive and humbly offer to your Lordships consideration Principiis obsta that in the beginning of this Commotion Your Lordship as it is hereditary for you will be a Physitian to cure this Disease in us and by our Examples it will doubtless beget the like auspicious scucess in all other parts of the Kingdom For we are of opinion it is one sickness and one pharmach will suffice Sublata causa tollitur Effectus And it will be recorded that you will do service unto God King and Countrey And for salving every the aforsaid Soars your Lordship is to be an humble Suitor in our behalf and of the rest of the Papists that out of the abundance of his Majesties Clemency there may be an Act of Oblivion and general pardon without restitution or Account of Goods taken in the time of this Commotion a liberty of our Religion a repeal of all Statutes formerly made to the contrary and not by Proclamation but Parliamentary way A Charter free Denizen in ample manner for meer Irish All which in succeeding Ages will prove an Union in all his Majesties Dominions instead of Division a Comfort in Desolation and a Happiness in perpetnity for an eminent Calamity And this being granted there will be all things Quae sunt Caesaris Caesari and Quae sunt Dei Deo And it was by the Poet written though he be prophane in other matters yet in this prophetically Divisum Imperium cum Jove Caesar habet All which for this present we to leave your Honourable Care And we will as we ever did and do remain Your very humble and assured ever to be Commanded Hugh mac Gillernow Farrall James Farrall Bryan Farrall Readagh Farrall Edmond mac Cael Farrall John Farrall in Carbuy Garret Farrall Lisagh mac Conel Farrall Bryan mac William Farrall James mac Trig Farrall his Mark Morgan mac Carbry Farrall Donnagh mac Carbry Farrall Richard mac Conel Farrall William Mac James Farrall James Farrall Taghna mac Rory Farral Cormack mac Rory Farrall Conock mac Bryne Farrall John mac Edmund Farrall John Farrall Roger mac Bryne Farrall Barnaby Farrall Redeagh mac Lisagh Farrall Connor Oge mac Connor Farrall Edmond mac Connor Farrall Cahel mac Bryne Farrall Before the Parliament broke up the Popish Lords deputed the Lord Dillon to go into England to carry over their Desires to the King and to represent the Means which they thought fittest for the suppressing of the Rebellion and he with the Lord Taaf imbarqued for England but by stress of Weather the Vessel was driven into Scotland and they took their way by Land for London But the Parliament having notice of their coming they were by Order of the Commons seized upon and brought up in safe Custody and all their Papers searched and Examined So unwilling it seems was the Faction that any Address should be made to the King or that any Steps should be made towards the reducing that Kingdom to his Majesties Obedience by any sort of Treaty or Accommodation By this procedure though they gained upon the good Opinion of the People whose favor they most industriously courted and to whom nothing sounded more pleasant then what seemed to express a Hatred and Detestation of the Irish Rebellion and Religion yet certainly was it a means of running the Rebels into such Extremities as dispair of Mercy are wont to produce in those who have transgressed the Bounds of Law and Duty and know their Lives and Estates without it to be forfeited to Justice But for the better understanding of this and some other Particulars the Reader may peruse the following Extracts of some Letters from the Board in Ireland which I found among the old Papers of the Clerk of the Parliaments Office Extract of a Letter of the Lords Justices and Council of Ireland to the Lord Lieutenant dated the 25th of November 1641. THe Rebels in the County of Wexford increasing daily Extract of divers Letters of the Lords Justices Council of Ireland to the Lord Lieutenant received the 6 of December by Mr. Fitz-Girald read Dec. 10. 1641. have taken the Castles of Arickloe Limbrick the Lord Esmond 's House and Fort-Chichester places of good Strength and Importance The Rebels also in the County of Wickloe have laid Siege to his Majesties Castle of Wickloe those in that Castle were in fight with them Yesterday what the issue is we yet hear not and some of those Rebels in the County of Wickloe have dared to come within four Miles of this City and swept away great droves of Cattle And in both Counties as well Wickloe as Wexford all the Castles and Houses of the English with all their substance are come into the hands of the Rebels and the English with their Wives and Children strip'd naked and banished thence by their fury and rage The Rebels in the County of Longford do still increase also as well in their Numbers as in their