binde the lessor otherwise of admittances upon surrenders or descents for he was tenant at sufferance who hath no lawfull interest and a Writ of entry ad terminum qui praeteriit lyes against him and so he is a deforceor Murrell and Smiths case 33. and 34. of the Queene fo 24. THe Queene grants a Copyhold in fee and after grants the inheritance of the Copyhold to a stranger the Copyholder devises to M. and after surrenders to the use of his will Resolved that custome hath so established the estate of a Copyholder that by severance of the inheritance of the Copyhold from the Mannor the Copyhold is not destroyed for being the Lord himselfe could not ouste the Copiholder no more can another claiming in by him Objected that every Copyhold ought to be parcell of the Mannor and to be demised or demisable time out of memory Resolved that because once this had both the incidents aforesaid and its perfection the severance made by the Lord shall not destroy it Resolved that notwithstanding the surrender and devise the Copyhold descended to the heire for after the severance of the inheritance from the Mannor the surrender was utterly voyd for the land was not parcell of the Mannor at the time and the devise onely cannot transferre such a customary estate but it ought to be by surrender into the hands of the Lord c. Resolved that after severance the Copyholder shall pay his rent to the Feoffee and shall pay and do other services which are due without admittance or holding of a Court as to plough the demeanes of the Lord Heriot c. but suite of Court and Fine upon alienation or admittance are gone for now the land cannot be aliened for though the Copyholder hath some benefit by the severance as appeares before so he hath great prejudice for now he cannot surrender or alien his estate nor the Feoffee cannot make an admittance for he is not dominus pro tempore Resolved that such forfeitures remaine as were before the severance as Feoffement lease wast denier of rent So if the land were of the nature of Borough English or Gavelkind and other customes which run with the land remaine And 't was said that such Copyholder hath no other meanes to alien but by Decree in Chancery against him and his heires but by this the interest of the land is not bound but the person onely Kite and Queintons case 31. of the Queene fo 25. COpyholder in fee surrenders out of Court by the custome to the hands of certaine Copyhold tenants to the use of another and his heires upon certaine condition at the next Court the surrender was presented but the condition omitted he to whose use c. dyes the Lord admits his heire he that made the surrender releases to the heire being in possession and after enters Resolved that the presentment of the surrender was voyde for that the condition was omitted for the surrender that the Copiholder made was not presented but if the surrender the condition had been presented and the Steward in entring of it omits the condition upon sufficient proofe of it the surrender shall not be avoyded but the roll amended for the roll doth not conclude the party for to plead or give in evidence the truth of the matter Resolved if a Copyholder be ousted by wrong a release by him to the disseisor doth not transferre his right because he hath not any customary estate upon which the release of the customary right may inure and this should be prejudiciall to the Lord for by this he shall lose his Fine and services but a release made to him which is admitted by the Lord and in possession is good and a release of a customary right may inure to him and the Lord not prejudiced and the release shall inure by way of extinguishment And Littleton speaks of an alienation by surrender onely which ought to be into the hands of the Lord but a release cannot be done to the Lord and Littleton says He which claimes a Copihold by surrender hath no other evidence but he which claimes an extinguishment of a right may have it by release by Deed and 't is no perill to purchasors for if the Copiholder in possession sels it he will shew the release and he which is out of possession cannot sell till he hath regained the possession caveat emptor By Wray if he which hath a pretensed title c. to a Copihold bargaines c. this is within 32. H. 8. for the Statute says any right or title and great part of the land within the Realme is in Copy and therefore the intention was to include them to avoyde maintenance and champerty Melwich and Luters case 30. of the Queene fo 26. REsolved that the lessee of a copiholder for a yeare shall maintaine an Ej ' Firmae for his terme being warranted by Law by force of the generall custome of the Realme 't is reason that he should have remedy by Ej ' Firmae And this is a speedy course against a Stranger Resolved that the Copiholds are not destroyed by severance of the inheritance of them from the Mannor but remaine in force So Murrels case before adjudged Resolved that when the Lord of a Mannor having many ancient Copiholds in a Towne grants the inheritance of all the Copiholds the grantee may hold a Court for the customary tenants and accept surrenders and make admittances and grants for every Mannor which consists of Freeholders and Copiholders comprehends in effect two severall Courts the one the Court Baron for Freeholders and in this the Suitors viz. the Freeholders are Judges and the other Court for the Copiholders and in this the Steward or the Lord himselfe is Judge and though this is not a Mannor in Law because it wants Freeholders yet the grantee may hold such Court as aforesaid for Copiholders onely as the grantor himselfe might So if all the Freeholds escheate or the Lord releases the tenure and services yet he may hold a customary Court for the Copiholds Note Reader though the Lord by his own act cannot make of one and the same Mannor at common Law divers severall Mannors consisting of Demeanes and Freeholders yet he may make a customary Mannor of Copiholders Resolved that the Lord himselfe may make a grant or admittance of a Copiholder out of the Mannor at what place he pleases but if the Steward at any Court holden out of the Mannor shall make grants or admittances they are voyd Neales case 37. of the Queene fo 26. ADjudged that where the Lord of a Mannor demises all his lands granted by Copy for two thousand yeares that the lessee may hold Courts for Copiholders as Melwiches case is before and 't was said so to be resolved in C. Hattons case Note Reader a good diversity where the number of the Copiholders may support the custome and a singular case of a Copiholder as in Murrels case before in which case the
dyes after R. enters and dyes 18. Eliz. the executor of T. enters and assignes to J. S. the Successor of the Rector enters and Leases to B. who upon ouster brought an Ej. Firmae Resolved for the Plaintiffe and that the Lease to T. is voyd Argued for T. that his demise was good and a difference taken betwixt terminum annorum and tempus annorum as in this case of the demise to T. during so many yeares of the fourescore yeares c. not of the terme of fourescore yeares if a Lease be made for 21. yeares and after another Lease to commence from the end and expiration of the said terme of yeares and after the first Lease is surrendered the second terme shall commence presently not so if it were from the end of the said 21. yeares Resolved that the demises to R. and W. are voyd because the terme that El. had was sub modo if she should so long live which is determined by her death ergo no residue can remaine to R. and W. and so 't was adjudged between Greene and Edwards and the Court agreed the diversity betwixt the demises to R. and W. and the demise to T. 't was argued that the demise to T. was voyd 1. Because that the Lessor had not power for to contract for the land during the fourescore yeares for he had but a possibility to have the land againe during the fourescore yeares viz. if El. dyed which possibility cannot be demised but the Court delivered no opinion to this poynt 2. That the Lease to T. was voyd for the incertainty how many yeares should be behinde at the death of El. a termor grants to B. so many yeares as shall be behinde tempore mortis suae 't is voyd Locrofts case adjudged a man possessed of a terme of 90. yeares upon marriage of his Sonne demised the land to his Sonne for 70. yeares to commence after his death the Lessor dyes the lease was adjudged good because here he demised the land for 70. yeares which is certaine in which this differs from 7. E. 6. which diversity was agreed by the whole Court 3. That 't was voyd because he dyed in the life of El. so that the incertainty cannot be reduced to a certainty in his life time and so cannot rest in the executors a lease to one for so many yeares as his Executors shall name is voyd Note a diversity betwixt a covenant and agreement which is perfect and certaine though it takes effect in possession upon a future matter precedent and a covenant and agreement incertaine which is to be reduced to a certainty by matter ex post facto for in the first case the estate is bound presently in the other not which was agreed by the Court. 4. It was moved if T. had been in life the demise could not rest in him T. dyed before R. or W. and R. survived El. and by the expresse condition precedent R. could not take except El. dyed within the terme and W. could not take except R. dyed within the terme and this is as much as to say that if R. dyes before El. and T. cannot take except W. dye in the life of El. and R. survived El. So that both precedent contingencies faile viz. the death of R. and W. in the life of El. and though the demise to R. and W. are voyd yet the limitation precedent viz. the death of R. and W. in the life of El. to the demise to T. is not voyd for his interest may depend upon both the contingencies for so was the intention of the parties and this was affirmed by the whole Court by Popham Chiefe Justice The Lease to T. was voyd for another cause for it cannot commence upon a contingent which depends upon another contingent as here the demise to T. depends upon the contingent annexed to the demise made to W. and the demise to W. depends upon a contingency annexed to the demise to R. Digges Case 42. Eliz. fo 173. C. Digges was seised of the land in question and other lands in fee and by Indenture 6. Maij. 10. of the Queene covenanted in consideration of marriage betwixt him and his wife and for the advancement of T. their Sonne and for two hundred pounds paid to him before marriage that he and his heires would stand seised to the use of himselfe for life and after to T. in taile and after to the use of himselfe in taile with a proviso for the considerations aforesaid c. that it should be lawfull for him at any time during his life with consent of certaine persons by Indenture to be Inrolled in any of the Kings Courts to revoke any of the uses or estates and for to limit new uses 6. Maij. 12. of the Queene C. by consent c. by Indenture inrolled in the Chancery revoked the uses and estates aforesaid in part of the land and limitted the use of it to him and his heires after 20. Sept. 13. of the Queene by Indenture with consent c. inrolled in Banck M. 13. 14. of the Queene declared that for the payment of his debts that from the time of the inrollment of this Deed in Chancery all the uses in the first Indenture should be voyd and that the land should be to the use of himselfe in fee after C. 26. Octob. 14. of the Queene by Indenture covenanted for to levie a Fine of all his land part of which should be to the use of himselfe and his wife and his heires which Fine was levied the same terme after the Indenture dated 20. Sept. was inrolled in Chancery after C. enters and makes his claime and whether C. dyed seised in fee of the land mentioned in the Deed of Revocation of 20. Sept. was the question Adjudged 1. that C. D. might revoke part at one time part at another till he hath revoked all but he can revoke the same part but once except that he hath a new power c. to uses newly limitted for these words at any time amount to from time to time c. 2 That where the revocation is to be by Deed Indented to be inrolled this is as much as to say as by Deed Indented and inrolled and till inrollment no revocation shall be for otherwise perchance none shall be inrolled 3. That 't was no perfect revocation by the Indenture of 20. Sept. till the Deed were inrolled in the Chancery for though that the proviso of revocation in the first Indenture shall be satisfied with an inrollment in any of the Kings Courts yet for that the Indenture of revocation it selfe limits the revocation to take effect after the inrollment in Chancery it ought to be so 4. That the Fine levied before the inrollment in Chancery which was before the revocation hath extinct the power see Albaines case before adjudged and Popham Chiefe Justice said that without question such a power might be released for 't is not meerely collaterall but savours and tastes of
prescribe In modo decimandi but not In non decimando And the reason is because he is not except in speciall Cases capable of Tythes at the common Law before the Statute of 32. H. 8. Cap. 7. And therefore without speciall matter shewing it shall not be intended that he hath any Lawfull discharge and in favour of the Holy Church although it may have a lawfull comencement the Law will not suffer this prescription In non decimando to put it to the Tryall of lay men which sooner will straine their conscience for their private benefit then render to the Church the duty which belongeth to it A spirituall person that was capable of Tythes at the common Law in pernancy may prescribe to be discharged of Tythes generally or to have a portion of Tythes in the Land of another Before the Counsell of Lateran every man might give his tythes to any spirituall person that he would and if the Lands of the Bishop were discharged in his hands absolutely by prescription the demising it to a lay man cannot make it chargeable and the Bishop might reserve the greater Rent And in discharge of Tythes the Judges of our Law doe know that the Ecclesiasticall Judges will not allow any such allegation and therefore a Traverse Absque hoc quod judices placitum c. recusarunt is insufficient for the refusall is not materiall for the party might have a prohibition before any plea pleaded by him but in some Cases the refusall is traversable as t was adjudgd in Morris and Eatons Case where t was pleaded that the plaintiffe did not read the Articles c. and that the Ecclesiasticall Judge refused this Plea But the truth is a man may prescribe that hee and all others whose estate he hath in the mannor of D. time out of remembrance have paid to the parson of C. for the time being one certaine pension yearly for the maintenance of Divine service there in contentation of all Tythes renewing or happening within the same Mannor and prescribe in respect of the pension payd c. to have all the Tythes within c. and this was adjudgd good in Banco Regis Mich. 39. Et. 40. El. Rotulo 199. And that a lay-person may sue for the Tythes c. For at the beginning it shall be intended that the Lord was seised of the whole Mannor before any tenancy was derived out of the same and then by composition or other lawfull meanes the Lord had all the Tythes within the Mannor for the said Pension paying to the parson and the Law intends it was for Divine service Et pro bono Ecclesiae the reason of whch intendment is the continuall usage time out of remembrance And upon such speciall matter a man might have Tythes as appurtenant to a Mannor for he prescribes in a Que estate in the Mannor and therefore cannot have them in grosse but t was adjudged Winscombs Case in a prohibition that a man cannot prescribe generally in him and all those c. to have Tythes appurtenant to a Mannor without speciall matter shewne because Tythes are due Jure divino The Arch-Bishop of Canterburies Case 38. Of the Queene fo 46. A Religious house in M. was given to E. 6. by the Statute of 1. E. 6. a Rectory which was impropriated to it was granted to the Arch-Bishop of Canturbury who leased to the Defendant and Land within M. parcell of the said Colledge came to the Lord Cobham and from him to the Plaintiffe who shewes that the Master of the Colledge was seised of the said Land and Rectorie Simul semel as well at the making of 31. H 8. as of 1. E. 6. Resolved that this Colledge came to the King by 1. E. 6. onely for when 31. H. 8. speakes of dissolution renouncing relinquishing forfeiture giving up which are inferior meanes by which c. or by any other meanes cannot be intended of an act of Parliament which is the highest manner of conveyance that can be and the makers would have placed this in the beginning if they had intended it Bishops are not included within 13 of the Queene which begins with Colledges Deanes and Chapters c. Also 1. E. 6. Enacts that all Colledges by this Parliament shall be in actuall possession of the King which last act being of as high nature as the first it cannot come to the King by 31. H. 8. and it was never pleaded that of Colledges which came by 1. E. 6. the King was seised Vigore of the Statute of 31. H. 8. Resolved that neither the Act nor the meaning of 31. H. 8. extends to other Colledges then to those which came to the King by 31. H. 8. for it should be absurd that a Branch of the act of 31. H. 8. should extend to a future Act of which the makers of 31. without a spirit of prophecy could not have foreknowledge and the Act of 31. concludes in as large manner as the late Abbots c. which late as it hath been agreed extends onely to those to be dissolved by 31. Resolved admitting that the Colledge had come to the King by 31. H. 8. that such a generall allegation of unity of possession of the Rectory and the Land with it was not sufficient for no unity shall be sufficient but lawfull and perpetuall unity of possession time out of minde as 't was adjudged in Knightly and Spencers case and that the generall allegation of the plaintiffe that the Master of the Colledge at the making of 1. E. 6. held the Land discharged is not good without shewing how either by prescription composition or other lawfull meanes as 't is adjudged in the Bishop of Winchesters case otherwise if the Land had come by 31. then by force of the said branch of discharge such generall allegation had been good Resolved that no Ecclesiasticall house except religious was within the Statute of 31. H. 8. Resolved that though 1. E. 6. saith that the King shall have the lands of Colledges in as ample and large manner as the said Priests c. enjoyed the same yet these generall words doe not discharge the land of any tythes for they doe not issue out of the land for a Prior had tythes against his own Feoffment of the Mannor and 't is no good cause of prohibition to alledge unity of possession in a Colledge which came to the King by 1. E. 6. as 't is upon 31. H. 8. in Abbyes c. For the Statute of 1. E. 6. hath no such clause of discharge of payment of tythes as 31. hath and therefore such perpetuall unity will not serve upon 1. E. 6. So 't was likewise resolved betwixt Greene and Buffkin Sir Hugh Cholmleys case 39. of the Queene fo 50. TEnant in Taile the remainder in taile the remainder bargaines and sells the Land and all his estate to J. S. to have for the life of Tenant in taile the remainder to the Queene c. upon condition that the
had and after B. and A. levie a Fine to Perkins and he renders a rent of 42. pounds to B. and the Mannor with the Advowson to A. A. dyes without granting the Advowson and B. did not request it B. enters for condition broken and by Indenture inrolled bargained c. to the Lord Cromwell by which he entered and upon the reentry of the Sonne and heire of A. brought an Assise In this Case is shewed when this word proviso or provided maketh a condition and when not which upon long debate was judged by all the Justices of England It was adjudged that the Law hath not appointed any place in a deed or instrument proper or particular to a condition but in what place it pleaseth the parties and this word proviso or provided is as apt a word to make an estate conditionall as Sub conditione or any other word of condition but notwithstanding when this word proviso maketh an Estate or interest conditionall three things are to be observed First that the proviso doe not depend upon another sentence nor participate thereof but stand originally of it selfe Secondly that the proviso be the word of the bargainor Feoffor Donor Lessor c. Thirdly that it be compulsory to enforce the barganee Feoffee Donee Lessee c. to doe an act and where these concurre it was resolved that it was a condition in what place soever it be placed for Cujus est dare ejus est disponere And although words of Covenant be contained in the same clause of the proviso it selfe yet the proviso being in judgement of Law a word of condition it shall not loose his force and so it hath beene judged In Symson et Titterell 26. El. Serjeant Bendlowes demysed to Titterell certaine Lands in Essex for forty yeares provided alwayes and it is Covenanted and agreed betweene the said Parties That the Lessee c. should not alien and this was adjudged a condition by force of the proviso and a Covenant also by force of th' other words Also it was adjudged in Banco Regis 36. El. betweene the Earle of Pembrooke Plaintiffe and Sir Henry Barkely Defendant The Earle granted the Office of the Lievtenant-ship of the West part of the Forrest of Fronslewood in Com. Somerset to Sir Mawrice Barkely Father of the said Sir Henry in Taile provided alwayes and the said Sir Mawrice Barkeley for him c. doth Covenant to and with the said Earle that neyther he the said Earle nor any of his Heires Males c. shall cut downe any Wood growing upon any part of the premises And it was resolved by all the Justices of England upon argument before them at Serjants Inne that although the proviso was coupled with the expresse Covenant of the Grantee and every condition ought to be created by the words of the Grantor Donor Feoffor c. yet in judgement of Law this word provided was a condition created by the Grantor although all the residue of the sentence be the words of the Grantee for proviso being an apt word of a condition the same sentence containeth the words of the Grantor purporting a condition and the words of the Grantee comprehending a Covenant This word proviso when it dependeth upon another sentence or hath reference to another part of the deed doth not make a condition but a qualification or limitation of the sentence or part of the deed to which it is referred As in a Lease without impeachment of wast provided that he shall not doe voluntary wast grant of a Rent charge provided that the Grantee shall not charge the Grantor c. Resolved that B. shall have the Rent notwithstanding that before the Reddendum the use in Fee was vested by the recovery in A. and notwithstanding 't was objected that the Rent ought to be limitted out of the Estate of the Recoverors for 27 H. 8. hath an expresse clause Where diverse be seised to the intent that one shall have an annuall Rent the same person be adjudged in possession and seisin of the same rent as if a sufficient grant had beene made and so here the intent being that B. should have the Rent construction shall be made Vt res magis valeat quam pereat Resolved that the fine leavyed by B. and A. to P. hath not extinct the condition and this was the great doubt of the Case 1. Because by the generall Covenant 't is declared that all assurances afterwards to be made should be to the uses and intents in the same Indenture and to no other and the Indenture intends that the condition should be saved as the Lord releases all his right in the Land saving his Rent Putnams Case 4. 5. P. and M. Dyer Feoffement of a Mannor rendring Rent and a reentry and a Covenant by any Indenture to Leavy a fine which should be to the uses and intents of the first Indenture and to no other use which was leavyed according with the usuall words of release of all his right yet resolved that neither the Rent nor the condition was destroyed and 23. of the Queene Tussers Case a rent reserved by a fine before was not destroyed by a common recovery and generall entry into warranty and 34. of the Queene in Clever and Childs Case adjudged according to Putnams Case for the same reason t was adjudged in this Case 14. of the Queene for the Advouson of Alexton for Modus et conventio vincunt legem and Covenant and agreement of the parties hath power First to raise a use Secondly to declare uses upon fines recoveries c. Thirdly for to preserve Rents and conditions and for to direct recoveries fines c. and the saving may be contained in another deed delivered at the same time And these common assurances as fines and recoveries are to be construed according to the intent and common usage without prying into them with Eagles eyes Also here the Bargaine c. recovery c fine c. though made at severall times yet all by mutuall agreement are but one assurance and tend for to perfect a bargaine c. and therefore the one shall not destroy the other resolved that except in speciall cases a fine Sur grant render cannot be averred by word to another use then is in the fine feoffement c. yet in some cases it may be ruled in part by averrement by word when the originall contract is by deed but a man may by word averre another consideration which stands with the consideration expressed but not against it Reade the Booke at large for this purpose Resolved that by the death of A. the condition was broken for when the Feoffee or Grantee is to doe an act to the Feoffor c. upon condition and no time is limitted regularly the Feoffee may doe it at any time during his life If the Feoffor or Grantor doe not hasten the same by request and upon request and day or time limitted the Feoffee or Grantee ought to doe it
and accepted the Rent by the hands of the assignee due after the assignement and before that this rent now demanded was due the Plaintiffe demurred and adjudged against him because the privity of the contract was determined by the death of the Lessee and therefore after the assignement made by the administrator Debt doth not lye for rent due after the assignement Also it was said that if a Lessee assigne over his terme the Lessor may charge the Lessee or his Assignee at his Election And if the Lessor accept the rent of the assignee he hath determined his Election and shall not have an action after against the Lessee for rent due after the assignement no more then a Lord having received the Rent of the Feoffee shall avow upon the Feoffor afterwards Butler and Bakers Case 33. and 34. of the Queene fo 25. W. B. and his Wife seised of the mannor of H. by an Estate made to them during coverture for the joynture of the Wife in taile holden In Capite and W. seised of Land in F. both which amount to a third part of all his Lands and also of the Mannor of T. In capite which amounts to two parts W. devises T. to his Wife upon condition that shee should take no former joynture and dyed the Wife in pays refused H. the question was whither the Will were good for the intire Mannor of T. or but for part by the Statutes of 32. and 34. H 8. Resolved that at common Law if a gift be to a Husband and Wife in taile c. the Husband dyes the Wife cannot devest the free hold by any verball Waiver or disagreement in pays as if she say before entry that shee will never agree to it shee may enter when shee pleases so if shee saith reciting her estate that shee assents c. to the said estate yet afterwards shee may waive it in a Court of record but if shee enters into the Land and takes the profits though shee saith nothing t is a good agreement in Law for the Law more respects acts without words then words without acts and a freehold shall not be so easily devested to the intent that the Tenant to the Praecipe should be the better knowne But as an act in Pays may amount to an agreement so it may amount to a disagreement but this is alwayes of one and the same thing if the Tenant by deed infeoffe the Lord and a stranger and maketh livery to the Lord if the Lord dissagree ' by word t is worth nothing and if he enters generally and takes the profits t is an agreement but if he distraines for his Seigniory t is a dissagreement yet in some cases a claime by words shall direct the entry to be an agreement to one Estate and a disagreement to another c. See the Booke at large but a man may devest the property of goods and Chattells or an obligation sealed to him by disagreement In pays Resolved that though the estate was created by way of use which use before the Statute might have beene waived in Pays yet now the Statute hath so incorporated the use and possession of the Land that it cannot be waived In pays more then an Estate created by feoffment c. yet t was here resolved That the refusall In pays to have H. and the entry and agreement to T. was a good agreement to the one and disagreement to the other And this by 27. H. 8. ca ' 10. If any Woman hath Lands c. assured after Marriage c. after the death of the Husband She may refuse her joynture and take her Dower c. And upon these words the Court agreed That a Woman might refuse her Joynture In pays and be indowed by consent or Writ The great doubt was if by this refusall of H. by operation of Law it doth discend immediatly to the Heire after the death of the Devisor for to satisfie the Statute which saith The King shall take for his third part such Mannors c. as shall discend c. immediatly after the death of the devisor Resolved First Upon the reason of the common Law the refusall shall not have such relation that the devise shall be good for the intire Mannor of T. for a relation is a fiction of Law to make a nullity of a thing Ab initio to one certaine intent which in truth had being and that Propter necessitatem ut res magis valeat quam pereat 11. E. 3. The Law will make a nullity Ab initio that the Wife shall have dower but not as to a collaterall intent as if the reversion were granted of the Lands which the Husband and Wife held in taile and the Wife for to have Dower dissagrees yet the grant is good for shee may be endowed though the grant stand and Relatio est fictio juris et intenta ad unum And though relations aide acts in Law as Dower yet t will never aide the acts of the party to avoyd them by relation as a man infeoffes an Infant or Feme covert and after gives c. or devises the Land or any thing out of it the Infant or Husband disagrees this shall have relation betwixt the parties that the Infant or Husband shall not be charged in damages but shall not make the voyd devise c. good A Lease for life the remainder to the King the King grants his remainder the deed is in-rolled it shall have relation to make this passe Ab initio to the King not to make the voyd pattent good And as relations extend onely to the same thing and the same intent so also to the same parties not for to prejudice a Stranger feoffement of a Mannor and a long time after livery the Tenants attourne this shall have relation to make the services passe Ab initio or otherwise they could never passe nor be parcell of the Mannor but not for to charge the Tenants for the arrerages in the meane time So here the refusall shall relate as to the mannor of H. onely not to T. and to the wife onely but not to prejudice the Heire upon whom part of the Mannor of T. discended to make the devise good for the third part which was voide at the time of the death For Omne testamentum morte consummatum est and as it was at the death so it shall remaine Resolved that after the Statute of 27. H. 8. and before the Statute of 32 H. 8. the Mannor of T. was not devisable and therefore when the devisor hath not pursued the Authority which the Acts of 32. 34. H. 8. gives t was voide for part The first branch he hath not pursued which saith That all c. having a sole estate in fee simple in any Mannors c. shall have full and free liberty c. to dispose by his last will in writing as much of c. as shall amount to the cleere yearely value of two parts in three to
House and Tenant at will of Land and Tenant by coppy of other Land within the Mannor of S. to Fermor leased all for life to I. S. and also seised of other Land there in Fee levyed a fine with Proclamations of all Messuages and Lands which comprehends all those leases and also his inheritance by covin to dissinherit his lessor and after the fine alwayes continues in possession and payes the severall rents to F. The lessee for life dyes the yeares expire S. claimes the inheritance Resolved that the Lord of the Mannor was not barred by the said fine 1. The makers of the Statute of 4. H. 7. never intended that a fine levyed by Tenant at will yeares or Coppy which pretend no Inheritance nor title to it but intend the disherison of the Lord c. should barre them of their inheritance and where the Statute sayth That Fines ought to be of greatest strength to avoyd strife and debate This Feoffement and fine by the Lessee shall be the cause of strife where none was before 2. The Statute doth not intend that those who of themselves without such fraud could not levy a fine to barre those which had the freehold and inheritance should be inabled to levy a fine by making of an estate to another by practise and fraud 3. If doubt be conceived upon an act of Parliament 't is to be construed by the reason of the common Law and that so abhorres fraud and covin that all acts as well judiciall as others and which of themselves are lawfull and just yet being mixt with fraud and deceit are tortious and illegall If a Woman intituled to have Dower which is favoured in Law by covin causes a stranger to disseise the terretenant to the intent to bring Dower against him and recovers accordingly 't is all voyd So if a Feme covert or Infant much favoured in Law of covin causes another to disseise the discontinuee and infeoffe them they are not remitted Sale in Market overt shall not binde if the Vendee had notice that the property was to another or if the Sale be by covin the Law hath ordained the common Bench as a Market overt for assurance of Land by fine for it sayth Finis finem litibus imponit yet covin shall avoyd them A Vacat was made in Banco of a recovery had by covin 33 34. of the Queene adjudged where Tenant for life levyed a fine with Proclamations and five yeares passed and he dyed that the Lessor shall have five yeares after his death for though the Statute saves the right which First shall grow and the right first accrued to the Lessor by the forfeiture yet because the Lessor by covin of the Lessee might be barred for he expected not to enter till after the death of the Lessee 't is no barre and namely when the Lessee hath Land of Inheritance in the same Towne as in this case so 't was agreed in the same case if the Feoffee of the Lessee for life hath Lands in the same Towne and levys a fine c. the Lessor shall have five yeares after the death of the Lessee for he knew not of what land the fine was levyed not being party to the Indenture or agreement c. So the Judges have construed the act against the Letter for Salvation of the Inheritance of him in reversion And 't was said if the Feoffee of a Lessee for yeares who made a feoffement by practise hath Land in the same Ville and levy a fine and the Lessee payes the rent to the Lessor it shall not binde and in the principall case the payment of the rent after the fine makes the fraud apparant for by this the Lessor was secure and not cause of any doubt of fraud But 't was resolved if the Bargainee or Feoffee of A. perceiving that C. hath right levies a fine or takes a fine of a Stranger to the intent to barre C. this fine levyed by consent shall binde for nothing was done in this that was not lawfull and the intent of the act was to avoyd strife So if A. pretending title disseise B. and to the intent to barre the disseissee levies a fine for the desseisor Venit tanquam in arena and 't is not possible but the disseisee had knowledge of it and if he doth not enter 't is his folly But in the case at barre every one will presume that the fine is levyed of his owne Land because that he might lawfully doe and though this conteines more acres then his owne Land this is usuall almost in all fines and the covin of the Lessee is the cause of non-claime of the Lessor and a man shall not take advantage of his owne covin and here the fraud is the more odious because of the great trust viz. Fealty To the objection that it should be mischievous to avoyd fines upon such nude averments 't was answered that it should be a greater mischiefe principally if fines levyed by such covin should binde And an averrment of fraud may be taken by the Statute of 27. of the Queene against a fine leavyed to secret uses by fraud for to deceive Purchasors So by the Statute of 13. of the Queene an averrment may be taken against a fine levyed upon an usurious contract Twynes Case 44. Eliz in Cam. Stel. fo 80. IN an Information per Cooke Atturney Generall against Twyne of Hampshire for contriving and publishing of a fraudulent Deed made of goods The case upon the Statute 13. Eliz. ca. 5. was thus Pierce was indebted unto Twyne in 400. l. and to one C. in 200. l. C. brought an action of Debt against Pierce and hanging the Writ Pierce being possessed of goods and Chattells to the value of 300. l. in secret made a deed of all his goods and Chattells to Twyne in satisfaction of his Debt yet Pierce continued in possession of the same some of them he sold and his Sheepe he marked with his owne marke after C. had judgement a Fier fac to the Sheriff by vertue thereof Bayliffs came to make execution of the goods and divers persons by the commandement of Twyne with force resisted them claiming them to be the goods of Twyne by vertue of the same deed and whether this deed was fraudulent or no was the Question and 't was resolved by Sir Thomas Egerton Keeper of the Great Seale of England and by the chiefe Justices Popham and Anderson and all the Court of Star-chamber that this deed was fraudulent and within the Statute of 13. El. And in this Case divers things were resolved First That this Deed had the markes of fraud it was generall and without exception of his apparell or any thing of necessitie for dolosus versatur in generalibus Secondly The Donor continueth in the possession Thirdly It was made in secret Et dona clandestina semper sunt suspiciosa Fourthly it was made hanging the Writ Fifthly there was trust betweene the parties for
limitation of any estate Resolved that when the Lord admits Cestuy que use for life the reversion is in him that surrendered not in the Lord for he is but an instrument Resolved that a man may surrender to the use of his Wife though that Cestuy que use is in by him that surrendered because the Husband did not doe this immediatly to the Wife but by a second meanes Viz. By surrender to the Lord and by admittance of the Lord. Resolved that when B. surrendered out of Court and before that 't was presented in Court he dyes yet after being presented according to the custome 't is good otherwise if it had not beene presented according to custome so if the Tenants in whose hands c. dyes yet if it be proved 't is good enough so Queintons Case before if Cestuy que use c. dyes before admittance his Heires shall be admitted Downe and Hopkins Case 36. of the Queene fo 29. REsolved that where the custome of a Mannor was to grant Coppies for one two or three lives that a grant to a Woman during her viduity is within the custome for 't is an estate for life but every grant for life is not Durante viduitate issue was whether the custome was that the Wife of a Copy-holder after the death of the Husband should have for life and 't was given in evidence that she should have during her viduity and adjudged that the evidence did not maintaine such custome for 't is a lesse estate then for life But in the principall Case 't is a greater estate which is warranted by the custome and therefore a lesse is within it according to Graveners Case before 'T was said that a Lord may retaine a Steward by word to hold Courts c. as a Bayliffe and this retainer shall serve till he be discharged Harris and Jayes Case 41. of the Queene fo 30. REsolved that a Lord may retaine one to be Steward of his Mannor and to hold Courts by word as in the Case before Resolved that where a Copy-hold escheates by attainder of felony of a Copy-holder of the Queene that the Steward may grant it over Ex officio without speciall warrant for the custome warrants the Steward to grant it and this shall binde the Queene and her Heires c. But yet his duty is before to informe the Lord Treasurer Chancellor or Barons of the Exchequer or any of them for his better direction Resolved that the Auditor or Receiver of the Queene hath no power to retaine a Steward to hold courts c. But it behooves that the Steward who makes such voluntary grants upon escheats or forfeitures to be good to have Letters Pattents of the Stewardship of the same Mannor And 't was said that 't was adjudged in the Lady Holcrofts Case that where one was retained generally by word to be Steward of a Mannor and to hold Courts that he may take surrenders of customary tenants out of Court Shaw and Thompsons Case 33. of the Queene fo 30. REsolved that a Woman shall not be indowed of Copy-hold without speciall custome and that when a Woman is to be indowed by custome she shall have all incidents to Dower and shall recover damages by the Statute of Merton because her Husband dyed seised and therefore the recovery of damage of 50. l. in the Court of the Mannor was allowed though this exceeded 40 s Resolved that no Action of Debt lyes for these damages at common Law for upon such judgement no error or false judgement lyes but the remedy is in the Court of the Mannor or Chancery Fenner Justice said That he had seene a Record 36. H. 8. where the Lord by Petition to him had for certaine errors in the proceeding reversed such a judgement and upon this the Defendant maintained an Audita quaerela to be restored to the damages recovered against him See 14. H. 4. cited before in Brownes Case And 7. E 4. 29. Hoe and Taylors Case 37. of the Queene fo 30. REsolved that Underwood growing upon parcell of the Mannor may by custome be granted by Copy of Court roll and 't is a thing of perpetuity to which a custome may extend for after every cutting the underwood growes Ex stipitibus So 't was resolved that Herbage or any profit of any parcell of the Mannor may by custome be granted by Copy and 't was said that a faire appendant to the Mannor of C. in S. is granted by Copy and this explaines the reason of the first pillar in Murrels Case Frenches Case 18. 19. of the Queene fo 31. REsolved if the Lord Lease for yeares life or make any other estate by deed or without deed of Copy-hold Land forfeited escheated c. to him that this Land can never be granted againe by Copy for the custome is destroyed for during these estates the Land was not demised nor demisable by Coppy So if the Lord make a feoffement and enter for condition broken but if the Lord keepe it in his hands a long time or leases it at will he his heires or assignes may regrant it So if the interruption be tortious as by disseisin and discent false verdict or erroneous judgement for Non valet impedimentum quod de jure non sortitur effectum quod contra legem fit pro infecto habetur But if it be extended upon a Statute or recognizance acknowledged by the Lord or if the Wife of the Lord hath this Land assigned to her in Dower though these impediments are by act in Law yet for that the interruptions are lawfull the Land cannot be after granted by Copy If a Copy-holder accept a Lease for yeares of the Lord of his Copy-hold 't is destroyed for ever If a Copy-holder take a Lease for yeares of the Mannor his Copy-hold hath not continuance Hides Case adjudged 17. of the Queene But there 't was resolved that such Lessee might regrant the Copy to whom he would for the Land was alwayes demised or demisable If a Coppy-hold be surrendered to the Lessee his Executors or assignes may regrant it If a Copy-hold escheate to the Lord his alienee by fine feoffement c. may regrant it Foiston and Crachroodes Case 29. and 30 of the Queene fo 31. ADjudged that where a Copy-holder in pleading alledges Quod infra Man praed talis habetur nec non a toto tempore cujus c. habebatur consuetudo Viz. quod quilibet tenentes praedictorum tenement vocat C. have used to have common in such a place parcell of the Mannor and that he is a Copy-holder of the said Tenement that this custome as well for the matter as the forme was good for the Copy-holder cannot prescribe in his owne name for the exility and basenes of his estate and if he had claimed common in the soile of another he ought to prescribe in the name of the Lord Viz. That the Lord and all his ancestors and all those whose estate c. have
had common in such a place for him and his Tenants at will but when he claimes this in the soile of the Lord he cannot prescribe in the name of the Lord for the Lord cannot prescribe to have common c. in his owne soile and therefore he ought to alledge that within the Mannor there is such a custome Note a good diversity betweene a prescription which is personall and alwayes made in the name of a certaine person or his auncestors or those whose estate c. and a custome which is locall and alleadged in no person but that within the Mannor there is such a custome this shall serve for those who cannot prescribe in their owne name nor in the name of any person certaine as the Inhabitants of a Towne Also the allegation of a custome shall serve when 't is referred to a thing insensible Viz. that all such Lands are devisable And for that in the principall case the custome may have a lawfull commencement that one copy-holder onely shall have common estovers or other profit in the land of the Lord and that in many Mannors some Copiholders have common in one wast of the Mannor and others in another severally so that the custome cannot be applied to all and because that all the other Copiholds may be determined and extinct 't was adjudged the custome was well alledged So to have common of estovers in the wood of his Lord parcell of the Mannor c. was adjudged good 10. of the Queene as 't was said Myttons case 26. Eliz. QUeene Elizabeth by Letters Patents did grant the office of the Clerkship of the County Court of Somerset to Mytton with all fees c. for life Arthur Hopton Esquire Sheriffe of the same Shire interrupted him because it was incident to his office Mytton complained to the Lords of the Councell and it was referred to the two chiefe Justices Wray and Anderson And after many arguments concerning the validity of the grant and conference had with all the other Justices It was resolved by all the Justices Nullo contradicente aut reluctante that the said Letters Patents were voyd And their reasons were that the office of the Sheriffe was an ancient office before the Conquest and of great trust and authoritie for the King committeth unto him Custodiam Comitatus And though the King may determine the office ad beneplacitum yet he cannot determine this in part as for one Towne or Hundred nor abridge him of any incident to his office for the office is entire and ought to continue so without any fraction or diminution without by Parliament and the County Court and the entring of all proceedings therein are incident to the Sheriffes office c. And though 't was granted when the office of the Sheriffe was voyd yet the new Sheriffe shall avoyde it as Scroges case in the time of vacation of the office of the Chiefe Justice of the Common Bench Queene Mary granted the office of the Exigenter of London resolved that the next Chiefe Justice shall avoyd it for 't was incident to his office Also in all Writs directed to the Sheriffe concerning the County Court the King says in comitatu tuo and in retourne of exigents made by him he says ad comitatum meum tent c. and the style of the Court proves it and by the Statute of 33. H. 8. the Sheriffe of Denbigh shall keepe his Shire Court at c. In a false judgement 't is said in pleno com' tuo recordari facias c. and in a precept of Tolt 't is said summoneas c. quod sit ad comitatum meum And it should be very inconvenient that another should have the custody of the entries and Rolls of Court which may be imbesilled and the Sheriffe responsable for them And it was resolved that the custody of all the Gaoles within every County belongs to the Sheriffe by right and are annexed and incident by the Law to the Sheriffes office vid. stat An. 14o. E. 3. ca. 10. Bozouns case 26. 27. of the Queene fo 34. A. Portion of tythes in L. appertained to the Rectory of G. which was presentable and the Queene was seised of the Rectory of L. jure coronae which was appropriated to the Monastery of W. and grants to B. ex gratia speciali c. totam illam portionem decimarum c. in L. c. Cum omnibus alijs decimis suis quibuscunque in L. tunc vel nuper in occupatione J. C. and that the pattents shall be of force non obstante aliquibus defectibus in non nominando male recitando c. alicujus occupatoris And J. C. never had any tythes in L. Resolved that in the occupation of J. C referres to all the sentence and not onely to cum omnibus alijs decimis c. 1 Because illam demonstrates fully that there ought to be words subsequent to explaine and reduce in certainty what portion by the intention of the Queene should passe viz. that which was in the occupation of J. C. and 't is not satisfied till it be come to the full end of the sentence 2. This conjunction cum omnibus alijs c. couples the last words to the former and makes the words subsequent to referre to all the sentence 3. If all the tythes in L. of the said Rectory should passe the addition of the occupation of J. C. should be vaine maledicta expositio c. Resolved that by grant of portionem decimarum c. the tythes parcell of the Rectory of L. doe not passe for portion properly signifies a part or portion in grosse divided and not parcell of the Rectory and the Queene had not any portion in grosse but all were parcell of the Rectory And ex gratia speciala c. shall not extend by any strained constructiō to make a thing passe against the intention of the Queene expressed in her grant and against the apt proper and usuall signification of the words of his grant Resolved that because J. C. had not any tythes there nothing passes for admit that a portion should be taken for a part then the effect of the grant is totam illam portionem decimarum in occupatione J. C. and in truth he never had any part nothing without question passes in case of a common person a fortiori not in the case of the Queene As to the point when a clause of Non obstante shall make the grant of the Queene good when not Resolved when the King by the common Law cannot in any manner make a grant there a Non obstante of the common Law will not make the grant good against the reason of the common Law as the King grants a protection in an Assise or Quare Impedit notwithstanding any Law to the contrary 't is voyd for protection lyes not in these cases for the losse which may come to the parties by such great delay But when the King may lawfully make
a grant but the common Law requires that he be so instructed that he be not deceived there a Non obstante supplies it and makes the grant good As the King having made a lease for life or yeares grants the land Non obstante that it be in lease for life yeares c. or if he grants the land and further grants the reversion of it depending upon an estate for life yeares c. 't is good See the booke at large Resolved when the words are not sufficient ex vi termini to passe the thing granted but the grant is voyd there a Non obstante will not serve as in the principall case and the Pattents were not holpen by 18. of the Queene ca ' 2. for Pattents of concealement are expressely excepted out of the Act. Terringhams case 27. El. in banco regis fo 36. REsolved that prescription doth not make a thing appendant except the thing which is appendant agree in quality and nature to the thing unto which it should be appendant as a thing incorporate as an advowson to a thing corporate as a Mannor or as a thing corporate as Lands to a thing incorporate as an office these may be appendant but every thing incorporate may not be appendant to a thing corporate as common of turbary may not be appendant to Land but to a Messuage or house as it is holden 5. ass 9. for the thing which is appendant ought to accord with the nature and quality of the thing to which it is appendant and turves ought to be expended in a Messuage The commencement of common appendant by the ancient Law was in this manner viz. When a Lord of a Mannor infeoffed another of arrable Lands to hould of him in Soccage id est per servicium socae the Feoffee ad maintenand ' servicium socae had common in the wasts of the Lord for his necessary beasts that did plowe and ayre his Lands and this common is of common right and commenceth by operation of the Law and in favour of tillage and therefore it needeth not to prescribe in that for so it is houlden 4. H. 6. 22. H. 6. as one ought if it were against common right But it is onely appendant to the ancient arrable Lands and onely for oxen horses kyne and sheepe c. And because it is against the nature of common appendant to be appendant to meadowe or pasture and because that here the prescription was to have common time out of minde to a house meadow and pasture as well as to arrable by which it appeares to the Court that there hath been a house meadow and pasture time out of minde 't was resolved that this common was appurtenant not appendant But if of latter times men have builded upon some part of such arrable Lands and some part thereof is imployed to meadow and pasture and this for maintenance of tillage the originall cause of common the common remaines appendant and it shall be intended in respect of the continuall usage of the common for beasts leavant and couchant upon such lands that at the beginning all was arrable But in pleading he ought to prescribe that the same is appendant to Land for though terra dicitur a terrendo quia vomere territur yet terra includes all and is arrable though converted to meadow c. For it may be plowed A man may prescribe to have common appendant to his Mannor for all the demeanes shall be intended arrable at least in construction of Law redd ' singula singulis it shall be appendant to such demeanes which are ancient arrable c. And when a man claimes common appendant to his Mannor no incongruity appeares of his own shewing as here So common may be appendant to a Carve of land which may containe pasture meadow and wood but it shall be applyed to that which agrees with the nature of the common Resolved that common appendant may be apportioned because 't is of common right for if a commoner purchase part of the Lands in which he hath common yet the common shall be apportioned as well as if the Lord purchase parcell of the tenancy the rent shall be apportioned And if A. a commoner enfeoffe B. of parcell of his ancient Lands the common shall be apportioned and B. shall have common pro rata And 't was agreed that such common which is admeasurable remaines after severance of part of the land to which c. But here for that the common was appurtenant 't was adjudged that by the purchase all was extinct for 't was against common right for by the act of the parties it cannot be in esse for part and extinct for part 'T was said that pertinens is the Latine word as well for appurtenant as appendant and therefore subjecta materia and the circumstances ought to direct the Court to adjudge the common appurtenant or appendant Resolved that unity of possession of the intire land to which c and of the intire land in which c. extinguishes the common appendant By Wray chiefe Justice common for vicinage is not appendant but for that it ought to be by prescription 't is resembled to common appendant but common appurtenant or in grosse may commence at this day by grant or prescription and by him the one may inclose common for vicinage against the other as hath been adjudged in Smith and Redmans case Resolved that a man may chase out beasts that doe him trespasse with a small dog and shall not be compelled to distraine them damage feasant Cases of Appeales and Indictments Brookes case 28. of the Queene fo 39. REsolved that in an appeale of Burglary 't was an insufficient count that the defendant domum c. felâ—… burgaliter fregit for it ought to be burglaâ—… or burgulariter which is vox artis as murdravit â—…it which cannot be otherwise expressed Resolved if the count had been sufficient he being â—…icted once should not be againe impeached but here he was discharged upon the insufficient count By Wray Chiefe Justice if upon accident a man and all his family are out of the house and one in the interim breakes the house and commits felony 't is burglary for the indictment is domum mansionalem fregit and so 't was resolved 38. of the Queene where a man hath two mansion houses servants in both and in the night when the servants are out c. the house is broken 't is burglary Wetherell and Darlys case 35. of the Queene fo 40. IN an appeale of murder the Defendant was found guilty of homicide and had his Clergy after indicted and arraigned for murther pleaded this conviction Resolved that 't is a good barre at common Law and restrained by no Statute the reason is because the life of a man shall not be brought twice in question for the same offence Youngs case 38. of the Queene fo 40. AN Indictment that dedit unam plagam mortalem circiter pectus
construed shall or might be leavyed and so 't was holden of a Lease or limittation of a use otherwise he which is to leavy the Summe by deferring to doe it may exclude the reversioner for ever see the Booke at large Resolved when the heire or reversioner c. enters and expulses him to whom the Land is limitted he hath election to recover the Mesne profits in an action or reentry and retainer till he leavyes the inteir Summe and the other shall not have advantage of his owne wrong and if a stranger had entered and occupied the Devisee ought to have taken notice at his perill for Vigilantibus non c. and none is bound to give notice but here the Heire himselfe concealed the will and the Devisee had no remedy for the Mesne profits after the death of the heire Resolved that a Gardian shall not ouste Tenant for life nor yeares of the Tenement Resolved that admitting the Gardian shall ouste Tenant for yeares yet he shall not hold over because his terme is certaine in the commencement continuance and end otherwise of Tenant by Elegit Statute c. they shall hold over because the terme is uncertaine Southcots Case 43. Eliz. in banco regis fo 83. IF A. doe deliver goods to B. for to keepe the goods be purloyned away yet B. shall be charged in a Writ of detinue For to keepe and to keepe safely is all one but if B. doe take them to keepe as his owne goods he shall not be charged with them And if A. doe pledge or Guage goods unto B. in this Case B. shall not answer for them if they be purloyned for he had some property in them and not a custody onely but a ferryman a common Inkeeper or a Carrier which taketh hyre they ought to keepe the goods safely and they shall not be discharged if they be stollen or purloyned But a Factor or a Servant although he have wages doing his indeavour shall not be charged Luttreles Case 43. Eliz. in banco regis fo 86. IF a man have estovers eyther by grant or prescription to his house although he alter the Rooms and Chambers in his House it seemeth that the alteration of the qualities so as it be not of the house it selfe and without making new Chimnyes by which no prejudice accrewes to the owners of the Wood is not any destruction of the prescription and though he make new Chimnyes or make a new addition to his old house he shall not loose his prescription thereby but he may imploy or spend any of his new estovers in the Chimnyes or in that part newly added It was also resolved that if a House or Milne doe fal or be taken downe by the act of the owner or by wrong of another yet for that the perdurable part which includes all doth remaine which is the Land whereupon the Fabrick is built he may reedifie the same againe without any Losse of his apendant or apurtenant but it ought to be upon the same place which was the Foundation of the old House for as it did support and in judgement of Law included the ancient house when it was standing so it supports and includes the new house so as it is in a manner a continuance of the ancient house Diverse Tenants doe hold of another as of his Mannor by fealty and suite to the Lords Milne the Lord doth alien his Milne with the suite of his Tenants and after the vendor dyeth and his Sonne entereth and buildeth a new Milne upon the other part of his demeane he shall have the suite to his owne Milne which the Vendee had before for the suite belongeth to him that hath the Mannor for no man may have suite to his milne by reason of a Tenure If it be not of Corne growing upon the Lands within the Seigniory or Mannor and the Lord may erect a new Milne within any part of the Mannor and the Tenure is due to the same and not to any particular Milne Druries Case 43. Eliz. Error in Banco Regis fo 84. A Countesse being a Widdow retaineth three Chaplaines he who is last reteined is not capable of a dispensation for the Statue of 21. H. 8. c. 13. is executed by reteining of two and the reteining of the third shall not devest the capacity which was in the first two but if the reteiner had beene at one time he who is first promoted shall be first preferred because in Aequali jure c. 2. Resolved if the two first die the third is not capable of dispensation without a new reteiner because he was reteined at the common Law and not according to the Statute Quod ab initio non valet c. As if the Sonne and Heire of a Baron reteineth a Chaplaine and giveth him Letters under his Seale and after the Father dyeth And it was said that the said Act shall be taken strictly as if a Baron be made Gardian of the 5. parts he shall reteine no more Chaplains then before and if a Baron retaine two Chaplaines who are promoted he cannot discharge them and reteine others during their lives Slades Case 44. Eliz. fo 92. IT was resolved that every contract executory imports in it selfe an assumpsit For when one doth agree to pay money or to deliver any thing by that he doth assume and promise to pay or to deliver the things and therefore when he selleth any goods to another and agreeth to deliver them at a day to come and the other in consideration thereof agreeth to pay so much money at such a day in this case both parties may have an Action of Debt or Action upon the case upon the assumpsit for the mutuall executory agreement of both parties import in themselves as well a reciprocall Action upon the Case as an action of debt and a recovery or barr in an action of debt is a good Barre in an action upon the Case brought upon the same contract and so likewise in an Action upon the Case a recovery or Barre in the same is a good plea in an Action of Debt upon the same contract The Defendant in an Action of the Case upon the assumpsit may not wage his Law as he may doe in an action of Debt If a Summe of money be promised in Marriage to be paid at severall dayes an Action upon the assumpsit lyeth for non payment of the first although no Action of Debt lyeth untill all the dayes be past Multitudo errantium non parit errori patrocinium and if the Debtor of the King sueth by Quo minus in the Exchequor the defendant shall not have his Law for the benefit of the King Adams and Lamberts Case 44. and 45. Eliz. in banco Regis in Ejectione firmae fo 104. UPon consideration of the Statute of 1 E. 6. cap. 14. it was resolved 1. That if one demise to any of his Kindred to superstitious uses although he limit them to pay certaine Summes of
A Man leaseth S. for 10. yeares and C. for 20. yeares and both to another for 40. yeares after the end of the said severall demises ten yeares expire the last Lessee enters into S. and upon ouster brings trespasse and recovereth for the joynt words of the parties shall be taken Respective and the leases shall commence severally upon the severall determination of the said leases Joynt words shall be taken severally 1. In respect of the severall interest of the grantors as if two Tenants in common grant a rent charge 2. In respect of the severall interest of the grantees as a joynt warranty to two severall Tenants 3. In respect that the grant cannot commence at one time as a remainder limitted to the right heires of I. S. and I. N. 4. In respect of the incapacity of the grantees to take joyntly 5. Ratione subjectae materiae as rent granted to two copartners for equality of partition 6. Ne res destruatur ut evitetur absurdum as in Cessavit the tenure is alleadged by homage fealty and rent and quod in faciendo servitia praedicta cessavit it shall be construed to such services onely as of which a man may cease Brudenells Case 34. Eliz. banco regis fo 9. IF a lease be made to A. during the life of B. and C. without saying during the life of the survivor of them if one of them die yet the estate is not determined But A. shall have the land during the life of the survivor for if a man make a lease of Land to two persons during their lives they assigne over their estate now the assignee hath estate for life of them too and if one dye he shall have the land during the life of the Survivor Note two diversities th one a limitation in this Case aforesaid th' other a condition for if a man demyse Land for 100. yeares if A. and B. live so long in this case if th' one of them dye the Lease is determined for the Lease is conditionall and not Determinable by limmitation of estate and the life of a man is collaterall to the Lease which is but onely a Chattle If an administrator have judgement and dye his Executors cannot sue execution of that judgement but he that shall be subject to the payment of the Debts of the first intestate and that are not the Executors of the administrator vide 26. H. 8. fo 7. Hensteads Case 36. 37. Eliz. com banco fo 10. A Feme lessor or lessee at will taketh Husband the will is not determined for it may be prejudiciall to the Husband to have it determined So if one of the Lessees or Lessors at will dye but in case where one of the joynt Lessees at will dyeth nothing surviveth but the others shall pay all the rent Jues Case 39 40. Eliz. com banco fo 11. I. Leaseth a Mannor to S. for thirty yeares excepting Woode and underwood growing upon it and after Leased to him the Woode for 62. yeares without impeachment of wast and leaseth to him the Mannor for thirty yeares after expiration of the first thirty yeares thirty yeares expire S. maketh wast I bringeth an action of wast 1. Resolved by the exception of Wood and Underwood the soile is excepted and the woods growing c. are of abundance 2. The Wood remaines parcell of the Mannor because the Lessor had the intire freehold otherwise if he had leased for life with such an exception so if one lease a Mannor excepting the advowson for life the advowson is in grosse for life but if he grant the advowson for life it remaines appendant 3. By the acceptance of the third lease the said Lease of the Wood for 62. yeares was presently surrendered because the Lessee hath affirmed the Lessor to be able to Lease Saunders Case fo 12.41 Eliz. com banco In an Action of wast IF a man have Land in part whereof there is a Cole-myne appearing and he demise the Land to another for life or yeares the Lessee may dig for cole c. And the reason is for that the Myne is open at the time of the demyse c. and when he demyseth all his Lands it shall be intended that his meaning was that all the profit of the Land should passe c. but if the Myne be not open but within the Bowels of the Earth at the time of the demise 't is otherwise Also if a man have in his Lands hidden or unknowne Mynes and Lease the same Lands and all Mynes therein the Lessee may dig for them Rosses case 41. 42. Eliz. A Lease is made to A. and his Assignes for his life and the life of B. and C. this is a Lease for three lives and the Survivor of them Countesse de Salops Case fo 13.42 43. Eliz. banco regis SHe brought an action of the Case against Crompton and declared that shee demised to him a House at will Et quod ille tam negligenter improvide custodivit ignemsuum quod domus illa combusta fuit the defendant pleaded Non culpa and it was found not guilty And 't was adjudged that for the permissive wast no Action lyeth against the opinion of Brooke in Title wast 52. And the reason of this judgement was for that at the common Law no remedy lyeth for wast either voluntary or permissive against the Lessee for life or yeares because the Lessee hath interest in the Land by the act of the Lessor and it was his folly to make such a Lease and not to restraine him by Covenant condition c. And by the same reason Tenant at will shall not be punished for permissive wast But if Tenant at will commit voluntary wast as pulling downe of houses cutting of Trees a generall action of trespasse lyeth against him for that these doe amount to the determination of the will without the entry of the Lessor but it was agreed that in some Cases where there is confidence put in the party an action of the Case lyeth for negligence although the Defendant commeth to the possession by the act of the Plaintiffe as 12. E. 4.13 If one doe commit his Horse to one to keepe safely the Defendant Equum illum tam negligenter custodivit quod ob defectum bonae custodiae interijt an action upon the Case lyeth for this Breach of trust also 2. H. 7.11 If my Shepheard which I trust with my Sheepe and by his negligence they be drowned or otherwise perish an action upon the case lyeth against him but in this case at the Barre there was a demise at will made to the Defendant and no confidence repos'd in him wherefore it was ordered that the Plaintiffe should not recover by her Bill Case of Ecclesiasticall Persons 43. Eliz. fo 14. In the High Court of Parliament AT a Parliament holden in this Michaelmasterme it was resolved by the two chiefe Justices Popham and Anderson and diverse other Justices Assistants to the Lord of the
such a Feast if you make a Feoffement to another of this Mannor before the same Feast you have forfeited the obligation although that you purchase the Land againe before the said Feast because that you were once disabled to make the feoffement If a man Lease a Mannor for yeares and the Lessee covenanteth to uphold the Houses and to leave the same Mannor in as good an estate as he found it and during the terme the Lessee maketh wast in Houses and cutting of Tymber c. the Lessor may have a Writ of Covenant before the end of the Tearme for cutting the Timber for it was impossible that the Covenant should be performed after for the Timber but otherwise of the Houses Fitz Na. br fo 145 K. It was also resolved that if a man seised of Lands in Fee covenant to infeoffee I. S. upon request and after he maketh a feoffement of the same to a Stranger in this Case I. S. may have an Action of Covenant without request Laughters Case 37. Eliz. fo 21. Banco regis WHere a condition of an obligation consisteth upon two parts in the disjunctive and both possible at the time of the obligation made and after one of them becomes impossible by the Act of God the obligor is not bound to performe the other part for the condition is made for the benefite of the obligor and shall be taken most beneficiall for him and he had an Election eyther to performe the one or the other for the saving of his Obligation but now Impotentia excusat legem Hallings Case 38. Eliz. Com. banco fo 22. ONe Covenanteth to make an estate in Fee at the costs of the Covenantee the Covenantor is to doe the first Act Idest to Notifie what assurance he will make that the Covenantee may know what summe to tender Mathewsons Case 39 Eliz. fo 23. Com. banco SEverall persons make severall Covenants in one Indenture or Writing the Seale of one of them is broken away that shall not avoyd the Covenant of the rest but onely the Covenant of him whose Seale is so debrused or defaced Vide Piggots Case in the 11th Report because severall Covenants otherwise if joynt Lambes case 41. Eliz. fo 23. com banco A. Is bound unto B. to give unto B. such a release c. before the 22. day of October next as by the Judge of the Prerogative Court is thought fit In this Case A. must procure the Judge to doe it or devise it for the Judge is a stranger to the condition and the condition is for the benefite of the Obligor and he hath taken upon him to performe the same at his perill but it is otherwise if the Obligee or his Councell should devise it Broughtons case 43. Eliz. fo 24. Banco regis IN an Action of Debt by Broughton Plaintiffe against Pretty upon an Obligation with condition where the Plaintiffe was bound in an obligation of 200. l. for the Defendant for the payment of 100. l. to C. if therefore the Defendant should save and keepe harmlesse the said Broughton from all Suites quarrells and Demands touching the said Obligation c. that then the Obligation to be void c. at the day of payment of the 100. l. the Plaintiffe commeth to the place where the 100 l. ought to be paid and perceiving there not any person present to pay the 100. l. for the Defendant Broughton to save the penalty of the Obligation paid the money to C. and brought his Action upon the Counter-bond and it was adjudged that the Plaintiffe should recover for the payment of the 100. l. is damage and harme And it is not necessary whither the Plaintiff was arrested or sued c. Terror of suite so as he dare not goe about his businesse is Damnification although he be not arrested Deane Chapter de Winsors Case 44. Eliz. fo 24. Banco regis A Man Leased a House by Indenture for yeares the Lessee Covenants and grants for him and his Executors with the Lessor to repaire the house at all times necessary the Lessee Assignes over and the Assignee suffereth the house to decay the Lessor brought an Action of Covenant against the Assignee and it was adjudged per Popham and all the Court that the Action lyeth although the Lessee had not Covenanted for his Assignes because in respect thereof the rent is the lesse which is for the benefite of the Assignee Qui sentit commodum sentire debet onus If a man grant one Estovers to repaire his house this is appurtenant to the house Fitz H. nat br 181.28 H. 8.28 Sir Thomas Palmers Case 43. El. fo 24. banco regis SIr Thomas Palmer seised in Fee of a great Wood. Did bargaine and sell to one Cornford and his Assignes 600. cords of Wood to be taken by Assignement of Sir Thomas Cornford assignes his interest to one Basset and afterward Sir Thomas sells to one Maynard such quantity of Wood as will make 4000. cords at Election of the Vendee and afterwards Sir Thomas assignes to Basset 600. cords of Wood to be taken by him who doth fall the same and Maynard did take them away and converted them c. an Action upon the case was brought by Basset and iudgement was given for him for Corneford had an interest which he might assigne over and not a thing in action or a possibility for it was resolved if Sir Thomas did not assigne them to Cornford upon request Cornford might take them without assignment for the Grantor cannot by his owne act or default eyther subvert or derogate from his owne grant Therefore it ensueth that Cornford had an interest that he might assigne over If A. have a house and Land and reasonable estovers in the Woods of another by view and livery of the Bayliffe c. if A. take estovers without view or livery c. he is a trespassor although he take lesse then he ought to have by livery But if A. demand his estovers and the Owner or his Bayliffe will not deliver to him he may have an Assize 2. If the Assignement were voyd yet the Defendant cannot take Trees cut by another but out of the residue of the Wood. The Earle of Rutlands case 2. Ja. fo 25. banco regis EDward Earle of Rutland seised of the Mannor of Eykering by Indenure dated 10. March Anno. 21. El. for augmentation of the joynture of Issabell his Countesse did Covenant with Sir Gilb. Gerrard and Thomas Houlcroft his Brother that before the end of Trinity terme then next following he would assure by fine or other conveyance the said Mannor to the said Sir Gilb. Gerrard and Thomas in Fee which syne or other conveyance should be to the use of the said Earle and Issabell his Wife and the Heires of the said Earle which Indenture was acknowledged and inrolled in the Chancery the 28. of the same Moneth of March by another Indenture betweene the said Earle on the one part and the Lord Burleigh on the other
fine after delivery of the Indentures of the fine the fine is said to be ingrossed 3. The Conusor shall not assigne error in the render because it is to his advantage and none shall assigne Error except it be to his disadvantage Dormers Case 35. Eliz. Banco regis fo 40. A Common recovery is had in a Writ of Entry in the Post de uno annuali redditu sive pensione quatuor marcarum and of an advowson whereupon a Writ of Error is brought 1. Because every Praecipe ought to be certaine but here it is in the Disjunctive 2. A Writ of entry in the Post lyeth not of an advowson But judgement was affirmed and thereby 't was resolved 1. That a common recovery is not like to other recoveries for it may be averred to an use 2. It is by mutuall consent consensus tollit errorem 3. A Writ of entry in the Post lyeth of an advowson common c. to suffer a common recovery and not otherwise for no other assurance can be had to barre the remainders 2. The demand of the rent is good for one of two things is not demanded but one thing by two names for rent and pension are Synonima and the rather here because it is said to issue out of Land which a Pension properly cannot 3. Common recoveries are so usuall that the Court shall take notice that they are common recoveries Rowlands Case 35. Eliz. Banco regis fo 41. A Pannell of a Jury is annexed to the Venire facias without returne this is vicious and not remedied by 18. Eliz. cap. 14. for that remedieth insufficient returnes but not where no returne The Countesse of Rutlands Case 36. Eliz. fo 42. RObert Moore is returned upon the Venire facias but in the panell before the Justices of Nisi prius and in the Postea he was named Robert Mawre if it appeare that Moore is his right name and that it is he who was sworne it is good for by the common Law this was a discontinuance against all the Jurors and discontinuances are ayded by the Statute otherwise if he were misnamed in the Venire facias and had his right name in the Panell and Postea Codwells Case 36. Eliz. Banco regis fo 42. A Juror who gave verdict was misnam'd in the Venire facias and had his right name in the Distringas and Postea and for that the judgement was arrested Nicholls Case 38. Eliz. Banco regis fo 43. C. Brings Debt upon a single Bill against N. who pleaded Payment without Acquittance which was found for the Plaintiffe although issue was joyned upon a point not materiall yet after Verdict this is aided by 32. H. 8. and 18. Eliz. Bohuns Case 39. Eliz. fo 43. A Fine was levyed of a Mannor and other Lands to the value of twenty Marks per annum so that the Kings silver is 40 s which was paid but in entering of it upon the Writ of Covenant the Mannor was omitted and thereupon error was brought but after that the transcript of the fine was remov'd into the Kings Bench the Judges of the common place amended the Record because it appeares to them that the Kings silver was payd for the Mannor and where the Writ of Covenant was Dede meipso for Teste meipso they amended that also and certified it into the Kings Bench upon dimunution and allowed Freemans Case fo 45. 41. Eliz. Banco regis IN an original Writ c. Quod nullus faciat vastum venditionem et destrictionem where it should be destructionem the fault was onely in one Letter the Court resolved upon good Consideration that it was matter of substance for Destrictio is a Latine word and altereth the sence of the Statute and matter of Substance in an Originall Writ is not remedied but matter of forme onely Vide Statute 32. H. 8. ca. 30. 18. Eliz. ca. 14. If an Originall at this day want forme or containe false Latine or vary from the Register in matter of forme after Verdict no judgement shall be stayed or reversed But if it want substance although it be the misprision of the Clerke this is not remedied by any Statute Gages Case 41. Eliz. Banco regis fo 45. A Writ of Covenant to levy a fine boare Date after the returne this is amendable because a common assurance but in other actions no amendment c. Cookes Case 41. Eliz. com banco fo 46. A Common recovery of the Mannor of Isfeild by the name of Iffeld is amendable because it appeared to the Court by collaterall things shewed unto them that Isfield was intended to passe Cases of Pardons Francklyns Case 36. Eliz. fo 46. In the Starr-Chamber A Bill was exhibited for a Ryot in the Starre-Chamber five yeares before the generall Pardon 35. Eliz. and it was resolved that the Kings fine was excepted but not the corporall Punishment but if it were exhibited within foure yeares all shall be accepted In this Case the Kings attourney may proceede for the fine Guilbert Littletons Case 39. Eliz. fo 47. Starre-Chamber A Bill exhibited in the Starre-Chamber before the Parliament 35. Eliz. and returned after this is excepted out of the generall pardon for it was depending before the returne but if an Originall Writ issueth out of the Chancery returnable in the common place this is not depending before the returne because out of another Court but after the returne it shall be said depending by relation from the day of the Teste and if the Tenant alien before the returne and after the Teste this shall be said an alienation pending the Writ Drywoods Case 42. Eliz. Starre Chamber fo 48. A Bill in the Starre-Chamber more then foure yeares and within 8. yeares before the Parliament in 39. Eliz. the Plaintiffe dyeth before the generall pardon this is pardoned for this doth not depend now and the words remaining to be prosecuted shall be intended for the party and not for the Kings Atturney Vaughans Case 40. Eliz. Banco regis fo 49. A Writ of entry in the Quibus depends in Wales before the generall Pardon and after the Demandant had judgement but the Tenant was not amerced 1. Resolved the Amercement is pardoned because the Torte was pardoned which together with the delay was the ground thereof 2. The Statutes of Jeofailes extend to Wales because it is made parcell of England by the Act of 27. H. 8. Wyrrells Case 41. Eliz. In the Exchequer fo 49. THe Queene brings debt upon an Obligation made by the Defendant to one who was Outlawed the Defendant pleads the generall Pardon and although that Debts due to the Queene are excepted yet Debts Originally due to the Subject and after came to the Queene are not excepted also the genetall pardon is to be taken beneficially for the subject and most strong against the King Biggens case 41. Eliz. Banco regis fo 50. THe King may pardon burning in the hand where the Defendant is found guilty of Man-slaughter and hath his
Deed to the Court the plaintiffe may pray it to be entred in haec verba the same Terme but not after Pagetts case 35. El. in communi banco fol. 76. IT was resolved that if tenant for life the remainder for life the remainder in fee if tenant for life maketh wast in trees and after he in remainder for life dye an action of wast is maintainable for the wast done in the life of him in remainder for life because it was to the disinheritance of him in remainder in fee. And now the impediment which was the meane estate for life is taken away Et remoto impedimento emergit actio It was resolved that when the trees are cut downe the property thereof belongeth to him in remainder in fee. And where it is said in some Bookes That he in remainder or reversion in fee shall not have an action of wast it is to be intended during the continuance of the meane remainder And in other Bookes is said in this case that an action of wast doth lie it is intended after the death of him in remainder for life Boothes case 36. Eliz. in communi Banco fol. 77. GEeorge Booth brought an action of wast against Skevington and declared that Sir William Booth demised for yeares to Ensor who assigned to Skevington The defendant pleaded an assignement to Elizabeth Cave before which assignement no wast was made the plaintiffe replyed and shewed the Statute 11. H. 6. ca. 5. and that the grant to Elizabeth Cave was made to the intent he should not know against whom to bring his action and averred that Skevington did take the profits the defendant rejoyned that Elizabeth Cave granted her estate to A. who demised to the defendant at will and traversed the fraud c. the plaintiffe demurred it was resolved that every assignee of every Lessee mediatly or immediatly is within the said act for the Statute was made to suppresse fraud and deceipt and therefore it should be taken most beneficially Secondly that he in remainder is within the said act as well as he in reversion Thirdly the intent of fraud aforesaid is not traversable but the taking of the profits which is a thing notorious whereof the Country may have knowledge In a formedon the tenant pleaded Non tenure the demandant said that he made a Feoffment to persons unknowne to defraud him of his tenancy and to keepe the profits the pernancy of the profits and not the Feoffment is traversable Samons case 36. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 77. THe plaintiffe and defendant referred all controversies to the Arbitrement of J. S. who did arbitrate that the defendant shall enter into an obligation to the plaintiffe that the plaintiffe and his wife shall injoy certeine lands which he had not done this is voyde for the incerteinty of what summe the obligation shall be for the award ought to be certeine like a Judgement Also the award was voyde as to the feme for she was a stranger to the submission Grayes case 37. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 78. Replevin THe plaintiffe intitles himselfe in barre to the avowry to Common c. which was traversed the Jury found that every c. time of minde have used to pay for the Common a henne and five egges the plaintiffe had Judgement for he needs not shew more then makes for him for this is not Modus Communiae paying so much nor parcell of the issue but a collaterall recompence to be paid for the Common for which the Terretenant had remedy but if the Terretenant had no remedy then the Commoner shall have the Common sub modo and may be disturbed by the Terretenant Fitz-Herberts case 37. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 79. THe father tenant for life the remainder to the sonne in taile leaseth for yeares to A. to the intent to barre the sonne A. infeoffeth J. S. to whom the father releaseth with warranty and dyeth this doth not barre the sonne for although that the disseisin which is made by the feoffment precedes the warranty yet because it was to that intent the Law will adjudge upon the intire act and so a warranty by disseisin 2. Although the disseisin was made to the father yet because he consented unto it the warranty commenceth by disseisin but if the father had made a feoffment in fee and dyed this shall binde the sonne if it be with warranty Foordes case 37. Eliz. Com' Banco fol. 81. A Prebend leaseth for 70. an Patron Deane and Chapter confirme dimissionem praedictam in forma praedicta fact ' for 51. yeares non ultra this is a confirmation for all the Terme for when they confirme dimissionem c. for 51. yeares it is repugnant but if they had recited the Lease and confirmed the land for 51. yeares this had been good for they have an authority coupled with an interest otherwise if onely a bare authority but by what words soever they confirme a lease for life or a gift in taile for part this is a confirmation of all because they are intire so if the estate of the disseisor or his lessee for life be confirmed for an houre yet all is confirmed Cases of Customes Snellings case 37. Eliz. Com' Banco fol. 82. S. Brings Debt upon an Obligation against an Administrator who pleads there is a custome in L. that an Administrator shall pay debts upon contract to a Citizen as well as upon Obligation and that J. S. upon a Contract had recovered and good 1. Resol Although that debt is given against an Administrator by the Statute of 31. E. 3. yet because they were charged as Executors before so that onely the name is changed the custome generally alledged is good 2. The ordinary by taking the goods was chargeable at the Common Law 3. This custome bindeth strangers The case of Markett overt 38. Eliz. fo 83. SHopps in L. are Marketts overt for things to be sold there by the trade of the owner therefore if plate be sold there in a Scriveners shop the property is not altered otherwise if in a Goldsmiths shop if he who passeth in the street may see it Nota the reason of this case extends to all Marketts overt in England Perimans case 41. Eliz. Com. Banco fol. 84. IT is a good Custome of a mannor that all sales of lands within that mannor be presented at the Court of the Mannor Obj. What remedy if the Steward will not accept the presentment Resp What remedy if the Clerke will not Inrolle a deede of bargaine and sale and therefore Caveat Emptor 2. Obj. That Interest is by the feoffment vested in the feoffee which shall not be devested by the Custome Resp That livery was ordained to give notice and a Custome which addeth more solemnity and notice is good Sir Henry Knivets case 38. Eliz. Banco Regis fol. 85. TEnant for life the remainder in fee leaseth for yeares the Termor is ousted the disseisor leaseth for yeares his lessee sowes the land tenant for life dyes he
but a labour to the Obligor or a stranger there he had time during his Life Fitz-Williams Case 2. Jacobi banco regis fol. 32. BAron and Feme Tenants for life and to the heires of the body of the Baron the Baron sole is vouched in a common recovery the taile is barred Copledicks Case 3. Report 2. Resol If Tenant in taile suffer a recovery to his owne use the remainder to his wife with diverse remainders over with power of revocation and limittation of new uses by any such writing he revoketh all the remainders except that to his Wife and by the same deede limits new uses this is good for by any such writing shal be intended the same or any such and it may be by the same deede for first it takes effect as a revocation 2. By limittation of new uses and there are not more instances then one in it See there Leaper Wroths Case cited 30. El. to prove that powers whereby the interest of Strangers shall be changed shall be taken strictly as a power to make leases for twenty one yeares he cannot make a Lease for 21. yeares to commence in Futuro The Bishop of Bathes Case 3. Jacobi com banco fo 34. THe B. 18. H. 8. Leaseth to E. and R. for sixty yeares proviso if they dye within the terme that the B. and his Successors shall reenter E. dyes the B. dyes the Successor Leases to C. Cum post sive per mortem c. praedict R. acciderit vacare for sixty yeares with confirmation R. dyeth Resolv every Lease ought to have a certaine beginning and the continuance ought also to be certaine eyther by expresse number of yeares or by reference to an expresse certeinty or where a Lease may be reduced to a certeinty by matter Ex post facto Agreed the second Lease vests presently in poynt of interest to take effect in possession at the end of the first Terme if by none of the accidents the first Lease become voyd in the meane time and then the Lease shall commence at the first accident which doth happen and the Lessee hath no Election The Deane and Chapter of Worcesters Case 3. Jacobi fo 37. THe D. and Ch. seised of a Mannor in Fee in which were Copy-holds grantable for three lives for 8. s. 8. d payable quarterly and herriotable grant a copy-hold for the Life of three reserving the old rent halfe yearely this is not voyd by 13. Eliz. cap. 1. Resolved the grant of a copy-hold for the life of 3. is good for although there may be an occupancy yet it is not inconvenient for an occupant shall be punished in wast 2. Grant of a Copy-hold is a demise by the intent of the Statute for in Law it is a Lease at will 3. The omission of Herriot doth not make it voyd because the annuall rent is reserved 4. It is sufficient that the yearely rent be reserved twice in the yeare for the Statute saith yearly which maketh a difference betweene this Case and the Lord Mountjoyes Case in the fifth Report Bellamyes case 3. Jacobi com banco fol. 38. A Lease upon condition that the Lessee shall not alien without License Assignee of the Lessee pleads that the Assignement was with License and shewed not forth the Deede of License 1. Because he did not claime by it 2. Because the License was Ex provisione hominis and not Ex institutione legis 3. Because it was executed and good Henry Finches Case 3. Jacobi banco regis fol. 39. A Grant of a rent charge out of diverse Mannors c. in the Parishes of E. and W. Aut alibi dictis marerijs spectantur and out of Lands which is not parcell of any of the Mannors these are not charged with the distresse for Alibi doth not charge more Land then is parcell of those Mannors but all parcells of the said Mannors out of the said Parishes Sir Anthony Mildmayes Case 3. Jacob. banco regis fol. 40. 1. REsolved a perpetuity is against the rules and pollicy of the common Law 2. It is impossible that an estate tayle shall cease before that Tenant in taile dyes without issue and an estate cannot be made to continue as to one and determine as to another except by Statute 3. A gift in taile upon condition that he shall not suffer a common recovery is voyd because he had power by the Law 4. It is a voyd saying that his estate shall cease if he goe about c. for Non officit conatus nisi sequatur effectus Also many ambiguities will arise thereupon because the Law doth not define it and it is so uncertaine that is not traversable Blakes Case 3. Jacobi com banco fo 43. AN accord with satisfaction is a good barre in a Writ of Covenant because the duty accrueth not meerly by the deede but by a torte subsequent together with the deed and it is a good barre in an attaint because this is not founded upon the record onely but upon the false Oath also In all cases where an arbitrament is a good Plea an accord with satisfaction is also and so generally in all Actions where damages onely are to be recovered Higgins Case 3. Jacob. com banco fo 44. IF a man have judgement upon an Obligation so long as this judgement is in force he may not have a new action upon the same Obligation For Interest reipublicae ut sit finis litium infinitum in jure reprobatur A Statute Staple is but an Obligation recorded and one Obligation cannot drowne another although they be both for one Debt and the Obligee may choose upon whither he will bring his Action 11. H. 4. and 2. Jac. Sir William Cornewalles Case and Branthwaytes Case and in every judgement the Defendant is amerced and so he shall be amerced in Infinitum Dowdales Case 3. Jac. com banco fol. 46. IN Debt against an Executor the Defendant pleads fully administred the Plaintiffe saith that he hath assets at E. the Jury found assets in Ireland 1. Resol when the place is materiall the poynt in issue cannot be found in another place 2. Where the place is named but for conformity assets may be found in another County 3. In a generall issue the Jury shall finde all materiall locall things in another County 4. The Jury by a meane shall trie locall things in another County as a release in a forreigne County the Jurors shall assesse damages for the profits of the Land in the other County Multa conceduntur per obliquum quae non c. but in case of felony the Tryall shall be where the offence was done 5. The finding of assets is the substance and that it is in Ireland is surplusage A thing done beyond the Sea shall be tryed here if the foundation of the Action be here Boswells Case 3. Jac. banco regis fol. 48. IN a Quare impedit judgement was given to remove the incumbent of the Queene not party to the Writ who was presented
pending the Writ Resolv That by the common Law by admission and institution the Usurpor gaines the inheritance of the advowson without regard of the nonage of the Patron because he is in by judiciall act and the Bishop shall be supposed not to doe wrong to the Patron and the incumbent shall not be disturbed to excercise his function but the King shall have a Quare impedit at the common Law Collation doth not put him who hath right to present out of possession but if one have right to Collate it doth an infant by the Act of W. 2. c. 5. shall have a Quare impedit if a man usurp upon an infant who had a Mannor to which c. by discent who at full age infeoffeth B. the Church voideth c. by the usurpation the infant was out of possession and his right passed not and seems the Infant is without remedy If a Clerke commeth in by course of Law this gaineth not the inheritance against the right Patron who was not party to the writ The King shall not recover damages by this Statute for he is not within the first branch Si tempus semestre transierit nor within the second Branch for that depends upon the first yet he shall count to damages An incumbent shall not be moved if he be not named in the writ and if he be not admitted c. pending the writ and lapse shall not incurre if the Bishop be named in the Writ otherwise if he be not If he who is presented pending the Writ be in by rightfull Patron or not yet he who recovereth in a Quare impedit shall have a generall Writ to the Bishop which he must execute of necessity and after that the parties may try their titles as the Law shall determine Countesse of Rutlands Case in the Starre-Chamber 3. Jacobi fo 52. THat the person of a Countesse or a Baronesse may not be arrested for Debt or trespasse for although in respect of their Sex they may not sit in the Parliament yet they are Peers of the Realme and shall be tryed by their Peers Stat. 20. H. 6. Peers of the Realme may not be sworne in any inquest a Countesse in Marrying with a Husband doth loose her Name of a Countesse If a Baronesse c. by Marriage marry againe under the Nobility shee looseth her dignity but if she be Noble by Birth or descent yet whomsoever she Marryeth she remaineth Noble for Birth-right is Character intelebilis and that which is gained by Marriage may also be lost by Marriage A Sheriffe ought not to dispute the Authority of Courts but he ought to Execute the Writs to him directed for thereunto be they Sworne Serjeant at Mace upon a cap. ad satisfaciendum came to the the said Countesse in Cheapside being in her Coach and touched her body with the Mace and said I arrest you Madame at the Suite of S. and those were all the words that were us'd therupon compell'd the Coach man to carry her unto the Counter-gate in Woodstreete and the Sheriffe tooke her into his house In this Case it was resolved that the Sheriffe Bayliffe c. upon the Arrest ought to shew at whose suite out of what Court for what cause it is and when the processe is returnable and that this generall Arrest of the Countesse cannot be said that it was by force of the said Writ of Execution and that this Arrest was of the Serjeants owne head without warrant and against Law and that the said Countesse was falsly imprisoned but she remained in the Sheriffes custody 7. or 8. dayes untill shee paid the Debt but because the Arrest was by a fained Action entered in the Counter the Serjeants were sentenced The Lord Chandos case 4. Jacobi fol. 55. THe King grants to B. in taile and in consideration of the surrender of the Letters Patents by force whereof the King is seised in fee granteth to him and his wife and to the heires of B. the reversion passeth for the recitall that the King was seised in fee was but the Collection of the King and no part of the consideration or suggestion of the party And when the King grants land in posseâ—… if he had but a reversion this shall passe for he is not deceived because lesse passes then he intended Bredimans case 4. Jacobi Com. Banco fol. 56. A Man deviseth a rent for life out of a Mannor and he deviseth the Mannor for yeares the termor enters and pays the rent after the Terme the devisee brings an assize against the Terretenant Resol Payment by lessee for yeares of the rent giveth no seisin to have an assize 1. In respect of the imbecillity of his estate 2. He cannot give seisin because he had not seisin and therefore a Pracipe lyeth not against him because he cannot render seisin but he may take seisin to the use of him in the freehold A disseisor may give seisin of a rent secke because he hath a freehold and it is lawfull 3. A rent secke is caecus siccus therefore it behoveth the first payment which giveth life unto it shall be made by a Tenant of the freehold and in this case being created by devise an Annuity lyeth not thereupon otherwise if it be by grant and Tenant of the freehold ought to attorne to a grant of such a rent over therefore he shall give seisin But seisin by a Bailiffe is good if seisin were had before within sixty yeares and seisin given by Tenant at will is good but it ought to be pleaded as payment by the lessor himselfe If the King hath rent out of a ville to be paid by all the Inhabitants seisin alledged in generall without naming any is good Gatewards case 4. Jac. in Com. Banco fol. 59. TO claime common ratione Commorantiae residen in villa de B. is not good for no man may have interest â—…ommon in respect of a Messuage wherein he hath no interest For custome should alwayes extend to that which hath certenty and continuance and without question tenant in fee simple ought to prescribe in his owne name and tenant for life or yeares by elegit at will c. in the name of him that hath the Fee and he that hath no interest cannot have any common and none that hath any interest although it be but at will and ought to have common but by good pleading he may enjoy the same No improvement might be made in any wasts if this custome viz. in respect of habitation and Comorance should be allowed for tenants for life or yeares at will by elegit by Statute c. of the houses of the Lord should have common in the wasts of the Lord if this prescription were allowed which were inconvenient A Custome that every Inhabitant in B. shall have a way over such grounds either to the Church or Markett c. is a good custome for that is onely easement and no profit and a way or passage may well sequi
personam The Lord cannot claime common in his owne soyle A diversitie was taken and agreed upon between a prescription and a custome a prescription is alwayes alledged in the person and a custome ought alwayes to be alledged in the Land for every prescription ought to have by common intendment a lawful commencement but otherwise of a custome for that ought to be reasonable and ex certa causa rationabili usitata as Littleton saith But it needeth not to have intendment of a lawfull commencement as custome to have Land Devisable or of the nature of Gavelkinde or Borough English These and such like customes are reasonable but by common intendment these cannot have lawfull commencement by grant or act or agreement but onely by Parliament and the custome in the case at barre was repugnant for it was alledged that the Custome of the Towne was that every Inhabitant had used to have common within a place in the Towne of H. which was another Towne Catesbyes Case 4o. Jac. fol. 61. SIx moneths being halfe a yeare semestre is given to the Patron of an advowson to present and according to the Kalander and not after 28. dayes to a Moneth and the Statute saith Si tempus semestre non transierit adjudicentur damna ad valorem c. per dimidium anni and being ambiguous it shall be construed for the benefit of the Patron Sir Moyle Finches case 4. Jac. Com. Banco fol. 63. THe Lady M. tenant for life of the Mannor of B. the remainder in fee to the Lady Finch shee and S. her husband and D. levyed a fine to one of the demesnes who grants and renders to D. for 50. yeares the reversion to S. and his wife and her heires with proviso in the Deedes which directed the fine that the reversioner shall enter and hould Courts And it was averred that this was knowne by the name of the Mannor of B. D. maketh his sonne of three yeares of age executor and administration was committed to R. T. S. and his wife levy a fine of all the lands of the wife in K. except the Mannor of B. to the use of the feme for life the remainder to Sir M. F. R. T. demiseth to P. L. for ten yeares Dame M. dyeth P. L. entreth by vertue of a power of revocation and limitation of new uses S. with the assent of the Lady F. his wife limitteth the uses to one who ousteth P. L. and maketh a feoffment to the use of the La F. for life the remainder to H. F. in taile P. L. reenters Dame F. dyeth H. F. for rent arreare distraineth 1. Resol By the grant and render of the demesnes the Mannor is destroyed because in an instant the services and demesnes are severed by act of the party but otherwise it is if by act in Law as upon partition so it is of an advowson appendant c. and upon partition many Mannors may be made of one but not by the act of the party 2. B. is excepted by the name of a Mannor 1. Because the intent of the parties is so 2. Exception of misnosmer shall not be favoured in Law 3. It is sufficient in Law in many cases that a thing be reputed as it is named as if a remainder be limitted to a Bastard by the name of sonne of J. S. and as to that was objected that this reputation is not time out of minde this needs not if it be of convenient time as this was for it was a Mannor revera before to levy a fine and continue the name after so that this reputation is stronger having such a ground and reputation serveth in Writts amicable although not in adversarie 3. The lease made by the administrator durante minori aetate is good because the administration is generall and not speciall to the benefit of the Infant but howsoever this is good during the administration 4. P L. in the life of the Lady M. had but interesse Termini so that attornement cannot be in his life but after the death of the La. Mo. by entry of the lessee the reversion is in S. and his wife without attornement because attornement needs not because the reversion is setled and he hath no meanes to compell c. otherwise it is where an attornement may be had and although that P.L. lessee of a lessee of part cannot make an expresse attornement yet his reentry shall be an attornement in Law so he who hath interesse termini may make a surrender in Law but no expresse surrender and a man of non-sane memory may make an attornement in Law but not an expresse attornement The Lord Darcies Case 4. Jacobi Com. Banco fol. 70. TEnder is not necessary to have the single value of the heire male or female but the heire female shall not forfeit the double value because the Statute of Merton is si se mavitaverit at the age of 14. yeares c. at which time the heire female is out of Ward and where by the Statute of Westm 1. cap. 22. it is provided that the Lord shal have two yeares to make a Tender it giveth not the double value but if he waive the two yeares he shall have the value without Tender quia de mero Jure c. Burrells case 5. Jac. Com. Banco fol. 72. IF the father make a lease by fraud and dyes the sonne sells the land knowing or not knowing of it the vendee shall avoyd it 2. If the father makes a lease to the sonne who assigneth it over by fraud the father dyes the sonne sells the land the vendee shall avoyd it Sir Drue Druries case 5. Jac. Cur. Wardor fol. 73. E. 1. granted to the Towne of Y. Quod omnes de villa oriundi licet terras c. extra libertatem villae c. te nuerint in Capite se maritare possint juxta libertates villae praedictae R. D. dyed seised of a house parcell of a Monasterie dissolved in the time of H. 8. houlden in Capite the King grants the wardship of his sonne to the plaintiffe and makes the Ward Knight the plaintiffe brings a valore Maritagij The Charter doth not discharge the defendant 1. Because it is juxta libertates villae praedict ' and the liberties are not shewed 2. This Charter cannot extend to a Tenure created in the time of H. 8. 3. It is not shewed that the defendant was borne within the Towne 1. Resol If the heire in Ward be made a Knight he is out of Ward for his body because by intendment he is able to doe Knights service otherwise if made a Nobleman 2. By the death of the tenant the value of the marriage is vested in the Lord and cannot be devested by Knighthood c. 3. If he be Knighted in the life of his auncestor he shall not be in Ward at all 4. If making of the heire in ward Knight shall devest the value it will be prejudiciall to the Subject and to the King for
give to them any interest or Title eyther to the things in action or possession for they have all their title and interest by the Testament and not by the Probate Power to grant administrations was granted to the Ordinary by the act of 31. Ed. 3. ca. 11. for before that time when a man died intestate the King who is Parens patriae was accustomed by his Ministers to seize his goods to the intent they might be preserved and bestowed for the Buriall of the dead for payment of his debts for advancement of his Wife and Children if he had any otherwise to his Kindred as appeareth in Rot. Claus de 7. H. 3. in ib. bona intestatorum capi solebant in manus regis c. And after this care and trust was committed to the Ordinaries and it was resolved Per totam Cur. M. 8. and 9. Eliz. Dyer that the Ordinary himselfe hath not any authority to sell any goods of the intestate although they be in danger of perishing neither can he release any debt due unto the intestate by a statute in Ao 31. Ed. 3. ca. 11. the Ordinary shall depute the next and most lawfull friends of the dead person intestate to administer his goods And the Statute in Ao 21. H. 8. ca. 5. is that the Ordinary shall grant the administration to the widdow of the same person so deceast or to the next of his Kin or to both as by the discretion of the Ordinary shall be thought good c. Reade this latter Statute to whom administrations shall be granted The Earle of Shrewsburies Case 8. Jacobi fol. 46. 1. REsolved that the grant of the Stewardship of the Mannors of M. and B. without naming the County in which c. is good as if the K. grants all the Lands of priors aliens without naming the County but the party in pleading must name the County and upon Non concessit pleaded it will appeare by the evidence and by circumstances what Mannor was granted but if he had demanded oyer and demurred it will be adjudged against him for it is matter in fact and the acts of confirmations extend not where the County is omitted but where the County is misnamed 2. The grant from a day past is good and the intent was that the Earle shall have the fees from that day but if that cannot be it shall be good for the time to come 3. The Earle had no power to make Deputies for three offices passe by these Letters Patents severally whereof this is the middle and to the first power is annexed to make Deputies but not to the second the words are Habendum offic praed with such a contraction To that the Court answered that this Habendum shall have relation to this office for it is intended that the Earle shall excercise this base office by Deputy for if a Sheriffe shall doe it a Fortiori an Earle 2. Admitting that he cannot make a Deputy this Non user is no cause of forfeiture for true it is when an office toucheth administration of Justice Non user without request is cause of forfeiture but if he be not bound to exercise it without request otherwise it is as here he is not bound by the Letters Patents to hold Courts untill he be required if an office be private and not for administration of Justice Non user without damage or request is no forfeiture 4. Resolved that the Writ and count were good although they were Vi armis and the difference is betweene Non feasans or negligence and mis-feasance that may be Vi armis therefore if one bring an Action upon the Case Quare vi armis he hindered men from comming to his Fayre which is Causa causans whereby he lost his toll which is Causa causata and the point of the Action this is good 5. The office not being meinorable it is in his election to have an Action of the Case or an assize otherwise it is of Land See five Exceptions taken to the Verdict Falsa Orthographia Non vitiat concessionem and the difference is betweene Writs and Grants Ille numerus sensus abbreviationum accipiendus est ut concessio non sit in anis and judgement was given for the Earle of R. Hickmots Case 8 Jacobi Com. banco fol. 52. IN Debt upon an Obligation the Defendant pleads a release which is in these words The Obligee confesseth himselfe to be discharged of all bonds c. and that he will deliver all but one bond whereupon the action is brought which was made by the Plaintiffe and another 1. Resol These words that the Obligee confesseth himselfe to be discharged of all bonds is a release and amounteth to that that the bonds are discharged 2. The exception extends to all the premises and not onely to the delivery 3. The Plaintiffe by confessing that the Obligation was made by another and the Defendant against whom onely he brought the Action had abated his owne Writ and after the Plaintiffe was Non-suited Batens Case 8. Jacobi fol. 53. A Quod permittat to abate a House levyed Ad nocumentum liberi tenementi I. P. and now of the Plaintiffe and Counts that the House of the Defendant doth juttie over the House of the Plaintiffe and judgement given for the Plaintiffe 1. Resolved the Plaintiffe needs not shew how he had the estate of I. P. 2. The Writ is Ad nocumentum liberi tenementi I.P. and now of the Plaintiffe and counts to the Nusans of the Plaintiffe onely it is good for the levying in the time of I. P. imployeth a Nusans to him and he must shew a Nusans to himselfe to maintaine the action 3. If it appeare to the Court that the Nusans is to the damage of the Plaintiffe he needs not shew it specially as if the House of the Defendant hangeth over the House of the Plaintiffe as here for it appeareth that the light was stopped and that the raine discended Quod constat clare non debes Verificare and the Plaintiffe may abate the Nusans if he will the Statute of Westm 2. c. 24. which giveth the Quod permittat against the alienee of him who levyed the Nusans extends not to the alienee of the alienee The Poulters Case fol. 55. IF one were taken for the death of a man he was not bailable at the Common Law without a Writ De Odio acia which serveth not if he be appealed or indicted 2. If he be found not guilty upon the said Writ he was not bailable without a Writ De ponendo in ballivum 3. A Writ of conspiracy lyeth not before acquittall but the conspirators may be indicted or censured in the Starre-Chamber Confedracies punishable by Law before Execution ought to have 4. incidents 1. They must be declared by some manner of prosecution as was in this Case 2. They ought to be malicious and for revenge 3. They ought to be false against an innocent 4. They ought to be out of
he lost his Common the Jury found that the Defendant did not put in the Beasts but they of themselves depastured there 1. The Jury have found the substance of the issue for the Plaintiffe the depasturing there and it is not materiall if he put them not there 2. This Action lyeth for the Commoner for he may distreine damage feasant and it may be that with strong hand he is hindered to distreine and so if he shall not have this Action he is remedilesse 2. A Commoner who had freehold in the common shall have an Assize Ergo a Copy-holder shall have this Action 3. The wrong ought to be so great that the Commoner loose his Common as a Master shall not have an Action for beating his Servant without losse of his Service and it appeareth not to the Court that there are more Commoners then he and if there be yet an Action lyeth because each had private damage and it is not like to a common Nusans which shall be punished onely in a Leete if there be not speciall damage but be the Trespasse never so little the Lord may have an Action of Trespasse The Lord Sanchars Case 10. Jacobi fol. 117. For procuring the Murther of John Turnor Mr. of Defence 1. REsolv That a Baron of Scotland shall be tried by Commons of England 2. The Indictment of the accessory in one County to a Fellony in another County by the Statute of 2. E. 6. c. 24. shall recite that the fellony was done in the other County for an Indictment is no direct affirmation of the fact 3. The Justices of the Kings Bench are within these words of the Statute Justices of Gaole-delivery or Oyer and Terminer for they are the supreame Judges of Gaole-delivery 4. The Lord Sanchar cannot be in the Terme-time Arraigned in Midd. before Justices of Oyer and Terminer because Justices of Oyer and Terminer shall not sit in the same County where the Kings Bench is but the principalls were Arraigned in L. in the Terme-time because this is another County 5. There needs not be 15. dayes for the returne of the Venire facias upon an Indictment in the same County where the Kings Bench is otherwise in another County 6. Because there is no direct proofe that the Lord S. commanded one of the principalls but that he associated himselfe to one who was commanded the best way is to arraigne him as accessory to him whom he commanded but if he be Indicted as accessory to two and found accessory to one of them this is good The word Appeale in the Statute of W. 1. c. 14. is to be intended generally Viz. By Indictment by Writ or Bill c. and attainders is to be intended upon any such accusation Ergo if upon any such accusation the principall be attainted erroneously the accessory may be arraigned because the attainder is good untill it be reversed but if the Accessory be Hanged and after the Attainder against the principall is reversed the Heire of the Accessory shall be restored to all which his Father lost either by entry or Action By 5. H. 4. cap. 10. none shall be imprisoned by Justices of Peace but in the Common Gaole whereby it appeares that Justices of Peace offend who commit Fellons to the Counters in L. and other Prisons which are not Common Gaoles Cases in the Court of Wards Anthony Lowes Case 7. Jacobi fol. 122. A. L. Tenant of 59. Acres parcell of the Mannor of A. by chivalry and Suite of Court to B. whereof A. was parcell and both A. and B. were parcell of the Duchie of L. out of the County Palatine holden formerly of the King in Chivalry in Capite and of another House there holden of A. by fealty and rent H. 8. grants the rent by release to him and confirmeth his estate in the said Lands by fealty onely and grants to him the Mannor of A. Tenendum by fealty and rent It was Objected that when the King grants the Seigniory to his Tenant the ancient Seigniory is extinct and a new one that is best for the King created Viz. Chivalry 2. When he extinguisheth services parcell of the Mannor of A. this shall be holden as the Mannor of A. is that is by Chivalry But resolved that the 59. acres and house shall be holden by fealty onely and as to the said Objection the release of the King doth not extinguish service which is inseparable to a Tenure that is fealty but all others are gone and true it is when the K. grants and expresseth no tenure it shall be by Chivalry but when the Land moveth from a Subject and the Tenure is changed the new Tenure shall be as neere the ancient as may be as Feoffee of Tenant in Frankalmoigne shall hold by fealty onely and here although they grant the services yet he limits the grantee to doe fealty A Knights fee is not to be taken according to the quantity but the value of the Land as 20. l. per annum and a Hide of Land is as much as a Plough can Plough in a yeare Reliefe is the fourth part of the annuall value that is of a Knight five pound of a Baron a 100. Markes of an Earle 100. l. of a Marques 200. Markes of a Duke 200. l. The Eldest Sonne of E. 3. called the black Prince was the first Duke in England and Robert Earle of Oxford in the Raigne of R. 2. was the first Marques and the Lord Beaumont was the first Viscount created by K. H. 6. Floyers Case 8. Jacobi fol. 125. BAron and Feme seized of Lands holden in Chivalry in right of the Feme in Fee levy a Fine to one who grants and renders to them and the heires of the Baron and levy another Fine to their use for life the remainder to their three Sons in taile one after another the remainder in fee to the heires of the Baron the K. shall have neither wardship of body nor Land 1. Resol That is out of the Statute of 32. H. 8. cap. 2. if he who had the fee dye c. in respect the estate by the first Fine did not continue and this although both the Conveyances are voluntary 2. The King shall not have wardship of the third part because it is not for advancement of the Wife for in the first Fine the Land moved from her and shee had no more by the second Fine then by the first 3. In regard the particuler estate is out of the Statute no wardship accrueth to the King by advancement of him in the remainder but if a revertioner upon an estate for life convey it to the use of his Wife this will give wardship of the body of the heire for he in revertion is tenant if a Lease for life be the remainder to two and to the heires of one he who hath the fee dyeth his heire shall not be in ward if the heire of one joyntenant who had the fee dye of full age living the tenant for
the Lord Dyer made a Quaere of that if one of the Jurors die before Verdict be given a Tales shall be granted he who is meerly a Defendant cannot pray a Tales untill default be made by the Plaintiffe the number ought to be under the number in the principall pannell except in an appeale because there the Defendant may challenge peremptorily the number shall be diminished in every new Tales and they ought to be of the same quality with the former as if the principall pannell were Per medietatem linguae so shall the Tales be Justices of Assize shall not award a Tales de circumstantibus in an Assize for the Statute of 35. H. 8. c. 6. speaketh where the Triall is Habeas corpora distringas or Nisi prius for an Assize cannot be taken by Nisi prius but must be taken in the proper County and after by advice of all the Justices of the common place and Barons of the Exchequer the judgement was affirmed Humphrey Lofields Case 10. Jacobi fol. 106. In debt upon Bond. D. Leased for a yeare to H. L. and if the parties shall please to renue the terme at the end of that yeare that he shall have for three yeares rendring 40 l. per annum H. L. bindeth himselfe to performe Covenants and faileth of payment of 20 l. at Christmas Quarter D. bringeth debt It was resolved for the Plaintiffe It was objected against the action 1. That the reservation was upon a contingency if the terme shall revive 2. Because the reservation is durante termino praedicto Viz. the last terme 3. The reservation shall be taken strictly because the words of the Lessor But it was resolved that the reservation extendeth to the first yeare for the proper place of a reservation is after the limitation of the estate as if a Lease be made with diverse remainders over reserving Rent this goeth to all and although the second terme be in contingency yet the first is certaine and Termino praedicto signifieth both the termes for it is Nomen collectivum and the reservation shall be taken reasonably according to the intent of the parties Tenant in taile of an Acre in borough English and of another by the Common Law by an Oxe dyeth having issue two Sons the service shall not be increased And Increase is onely betweene very Lord and very Tenant for there may be an increaser but not where there is a reservation or if the Seigniory be by Deed and services are reserved within time of memory for he shall have no more then he himselfe reserved In the Case at Barre in respect the obligation was forfeited the Court moved the Plaintiffe to take his arrerages costs and damages with which he was contented and so no judgement was given Arthur Legats Case in subversion of pestilent Patents of theevish Concealors 10. Jacobi fol. 109. in Communi Banco THe King ex certa scientia c. grants fifteene Acres as concealed which were parcell of a Mannor of the profits whereof the King was answered Nothing passeth 1. Resol If the King were answered of the old Rent of the Mannor and the Fermors c. suffer one to intrude in part this is not concealed 2. The grant is voyd for quae quidem c. is the suggestion of the party 2. This is a clause of restraint and nothing passeth which is not concealed 3. The King did not intend to diminish his Revenue which will be if the grant be good 4. The clause quae quidem hath a double conjunctive concelata detenta and Land cannot be detained from the King 3. Ex mero motu c. aydeth it not 4. If the Officers of the King may by matter of Record have notice of putting the Land in charge in Court of Record and doe it not yet this is not concealed and if the clause quae quidem be added for more certainty the grant shall not be vicious by it if it be false as if a Mannor be granted quod quidem was in the tenure of I. S. where it was not this is good If one substract or take the Kings Rents this is not concealed for the King may charge him as Baily and the Law will make a privity See the Statute of 4. H. 4 cap. 4. called in the Rolle Brangwyn in English White Crow And it was sayd that Perpetuities Monopolies and Patents of concealement were borne under one unfortunate constellation for as soone as they came in question judgement was ever given against them and none ever for them and they have all two inseperable qualities Viz. to be troublesome and fruitlesse Robert Pilfolds Case 10. Jacobi fol. 115. THe Plaintiffe in trespasse counts to damages of 40 l. and at the Nisi prius the Jury assessed for damages 49 l. and 20 s. costs at the day in banke hee released 9 l. parcell of the damages and had judgement of 40 l. and 10 l. for costs de incremento the defendant brings error because the damages and costs surmount the summ in the Count but judgement was affirmed for in reall actions before the Statute of Glocester 6. E. 1. cap. 1. no damages were recoverable but in personall actions and mixt they were and by that Statute a man shall have costs in all cases where he recovers damages Viz. before or by the same Statute therefore if after this damages are given where they were not at the Common Law costs shall not be recovered as in a Quare impedit but if a Statute after this give double or treble damages where damages and costs were by the common Law there the Plaintiffe shall recover the damages increased and costs also but in waste against tenant for life costs shall not be recovered for although that this Statute was at the same Parliament yet it was an act of Creation and therefore no costs And true it is that damages include costs in a generall sense but in the count it is taken for damages before the action brought in a relative signification therefore expensae litis may be added to it although he count not of them as a man shall doe in reall actions without counting of them because he shall recover them pending the Writ In entrie sur disseisin the Plaintiffe shall recover damages from the disseisin to the Writ of Inquiry c. and if the issue be tryable by verdict c. to the verdict but in a Praecipe of Rent of his owne possession hee shall recover all arreares to the judgement Judgement affirmed by all Cheyneyes Case 10. Jacobi fol. 118. IN a Valore maritagij issue is joyned upon the tenure and found for the Plaintiffe but the Jury did not inquire of the value Adjudged the verdict is insufficient and shall not be supplyed by a Writ of Inquiry 1. In this Writ three things are to be recovered the value damages and costs and although the issue be joyned upon the tenure yet as a consequent upon the issue and their charge they ought to
a Stranger be not in another part of the House but this was before 39. Eliz. cap. 15. whereby clergy is taken away without putting any feare if he rob any man of above the value of five shillings Accessory before in robbing a House in the day is ousted of Clergy by 4. 5. Phiâ— Mary Accessory in robbing a Booth in the night or day or out House upon 39. Eliz. shall have his Clergy Nota Although a Statute takes away Clergy from the principall yet the accessory before or after shall have it and where by statute for any offence a man is ousted of his Clergy the indictment must containe the offence with the circumstances in the Statute Dyer 99. and 183. And A. P. was ordered to be hanged in Chaines c. Metcalfs Case 12. Jacobi fol. 38. In Accompt IUdgement is given against M. Quod computet ideo in misericordia quia prius non computavit and before finall Judgement Error is brought 1. Resol It lyeth not 1. Because the Writ of Error saith Si juditium inde redditum sit which shall be intended of the principall Judgement as the Feast of St. M. shall be intended the principall Feast and the Feme shall be received upon default of her Baron after judgement of admeasurement before the principall judgement 2. It shall be intended an intire judgement therfore in an action against two if one plead to the issue and the other confesseth and judgement given against him he shall not have error before the Plea determined against the other for otherwise there would be a failer of right for the Kings Bench cannot proceed upon the Record nor the Common place because it is removed 3. The first judgement is not ad grave damnum for by that he looseth nothing but judgement of the arrearages and damages is the end of the originall 4. This is not properly a Judgement but an Award of the Court as ouster of ayde in partitione facienda an awarde quod partitio fiat c. which are but interlocutory and not definitive 5. They have day by the Roll untill the last judgment but if a Felon dye after the exigent awarded and before attainder a Writ of Error lyeth for necessity for otherwise his goods are forfeited by awarding of the exigent without remedy if diverse are sued by severall Praecipes and Judgement given against one he shall have error before judgement given against the other and if error be in the originall the tenor onely shall be certified for otherwise the Court cannot proceede against the others 2. It was Resolved That the Record is not removed because untill finall Judgement be given the Chiefe Justice of the Common place hath no authority to send it and they may proceed notwithstanding the Roll be marked Mittitur Richard Godfreys Case 12. Jacobi fol. 42. TWelve chiefe pledges according to the custome of the Mannor to present at the Leet that every one of themselves ought to pay for themselves 10 s. pro certo letae the Stewart imposeth a Fine of 6 l. upon them the Lord distreineth for the Fine and certainty of Leet one of the pledges brings Replevin and judgement was given for the Plaintiffe 1. Resol The Fine is not well assessed for it ought to be severall and not joynt as it is because the offence is severall and although that the offence be joynt yet the Fine shall be severall as in disseisin and trespasse But for the incertainty of the persons and infinitenesse of the number many may be fined together as a Towne for the escape of a Felon and the reasonablenesse and excessivenesse of the Fine shall be determined by the Judges Excessus in re qualibet jure reprobatur communi as excessive distresse excessive ayde and excessive amerciament are against the Common Law 2. If the Fine be imposed erroneously it may be avoyded by Plea for he had no other remedy 3. The Lord cannot distraine pro certo Letae without prescription because it is against common right but he may for a Fine or amercement but for an amercement in a Court Baron the Lord must prescribe a Fine because it is assessed by the Court needs not to be affered but an amercement must be affered by the Countrey 4 Admitting that he may distraine pro certo Letae he shall have a returne although hee had not cause to distraine for the Fine for where one brings an Action for two things and it will not lie for one of them it shall abate onely for that if he cannot have a better action for it but if he may it shall abate for the whole as in a Formedon of Land and of an advowson the Writ shall stand for the Land so if a man avow for diverse Rents arreare and it appeareth that parcell is not yet due yet the avowry is good for the residue but if a man bring a Writ of Entry in nature of an Assize of two Acres where it appeareth that for one Acre he ought to have a Writ of Entry in the per there all shall abate for this extends not to the action but to the Writ onely Richard Lifords Case 12. Jacobi fol 46. IN trespasse the Defendant pleads that J. L. was seized in fee and demised to T. S. and M. P. excepting Trees above twenty one yeares growth if not decayed for their lives and covenanted to stand seized de tenementis predictis cum pertinentijs superius dimissis to the use of R. L. in taile c. and the Defendant as Servant to the sayd R. L. entered and sold Trees and Judgement was given against the Plaintiffe 1. Resol That the Trees notwithstanding the exception remaine parcell of the inheritance and are not Chattels but shall descend to the Heire for the Law doth not favour severance of the Trees from the Land therefore if one bargaine and sell Land upon which there are Trees they shall not passe without inrolement 2. If there had not been such an exception the generall interest of them is in the Lessor and the Lessee had but a particular interest in them and the Lessor may sell them without license of the Lessee to take effect after the Lease determined and tithes shall not be payd for them because they are parcell of the inheritance 2. By the exception of them the soile is not excepted but onely so much as sustaineth the Tree and if he by licence of the lessee root them up the lessee shall have the soile but by exception of Wood the Land it selfe is excepted if an Acre or an advowson be severed from the Mannor by exception upon a Lease for life it shall not be parcell of the Mannor againe otherwise of trees for they were not severed in facto because they grow out of the Land 3. A thing in possession cannot be parcell of a reversion upon an estate for life but Trees which grow out of the Land and Fish or Deer in the Land may and shall passe with it
nor body were lyable to Execution in Debt or damages recovered but Execution was to be done by Fieri facias or Levari facias of his Goods and Chattells and profits growing upon his Land but in debt brought against one as heire his Land was liable to Execution because the Plaintiffe had no other remedy for the goods belong to the Executors but the body goods and Lands of the K. Debtor or accomptant were ever liable to Execution but such Levari facias or Fieri facias ought to have beene sued within the yeare or otherwise he was chased to his Writ of Debt and now by Westm 2. c. 45. he may have a Scire facias and by the 18º Chapter of that Statute an Elegiâ— is given of the moity of the Land which was the first Act that subjected Land to Execution for Debt or Recognizance and by the Statute of 13. E. 1. de Mercatoribus 27. E. 3. c. 9. 23. H. 8. c. 6. In Statute Merchant and Statute Staple all the Lands of the Conusor at the day of acknowledgement shall be extended into whose hands soever they shall after come But in all Actions Vi armis where a Capias lyeth in Processe there after judgement a capias ad satisfaciendum lyeth the K. shall have a Capias pro fine and in such cases the Law the preserver of peace subjecteth the body to Imprisonment and by Marlebridge c. 23. West 2. c. 11. a Capias was given in an accompt the proces before being a distresse infinite and by 25. E. 3. c. 17. the same proces given in Debt as in account for before this Act the body was not liable to Execution for Debt as aforesaid 2. If Land of the heire be seised in Execution upon a recognizance of his auncestor he shall not have contribution against a purchasor of his Auncestor although he come in without consideration and although the Heire be not charged as Heire but partly as Terretenant but one purchasor shall have contribution against another purchasor and one Heire against another Heire because they are in Aequali jure and therefore the Writ here which issued against the Heires without naming the purchasor is good although he be charged as Terretenant The Heire shall have an Audita quaerela as well as the Conusor himselfe before Execution sued and a Supersedeas but a Stranger shall not If diverse acknowledge a recognizance the charge doth not survive and the Land of one shall not be put in Execution but all their Lands equally so if two are bound to warranty both or their Heires and the survivor and the Heire of the other shall be jointly vouched and the Land of both shall be rendered in value But if Baron and Feme and the Heires of the Feme are bound to warranty and the Feme dye the Land of the Baron may be solely taken in Execution because there are no Moities betweene Baron and Feme So that when Land shall be charged by any Lien the charge ought to be equall but in a Lien personall otherwise it is as if two are bound in an Obligation there the charge shall survive But a Purchasor Bona fide before any Action brought shall not be subject to any charge And three Errors were moved in the record 1. The Scire facias was Haerediterrarum c. which is improper for he is not Heire to the Land but to his auncestor 2. The Writ is Scire facias haeredi terrarum c. and the Retorne is Scire fecit W. H. militi haeredi praedicti M. and every Retorne must answer the point of the Writ 3. The judgement is generall against Sir W. H. where it ought to be speciall for otherwise his owne Land shall be liable where by the Law the Land onely which came to him by his Father ought to be charged and he is charged as Terrtenant as aforesaid but these poynts were not resolved by the Court. Nota the new Writ of Error after entry of the first was not brought Quod coram vobis residet because the Record is not removed out of the keeping of him who had the custody thereof before A Perfect Table of the Principall matters contained in every Case in this Booke WHAT words doe make a generall warranty and to whom the custody of evidences doth belong Page 1 Tenant for life commeth in as Vouchee in a common recovery it is a forfeiture Page 1 2 23. H. 8. Extends not to suppresse good uses the conveyance good and the bad use void any man may give Lands to Charitable uses Page 2 Touching the Exposition of the Kings grants and how the words Ex speciali gratia mero motu c. therein shall be construed Page 3 A common Recovery by Tenant in taile binds them in remainder and reversion and all Leases and charges granted by them ib. A feoffement by Tenant for life destroyeth a contingent remainder Page 4 Conusee of Tenant for life and him in remainder in taile renders a rent to Tenant for life it is good during his life ib. Tenant for life and he in remainder in taile infeoffe I. S. it is no discontinuance or forfeiture otherwise if without deede Page 5 Perpetuities are against Law but the Parliament or Law may make an estate as to one and good to another Page 5 6 Tenant in taile suffers a recovery and dyes before Execution it may be sued against the issuâ— and when a man may enter or claime the Law will not put things in him till entry or claime Page 7 A man may be in by discent and yet not have his â—…ge ib. A future power of revocation may be released Page 8 When any thing Executory is created by consent of all it may be voided Page 8 A feoffement by feoffees devesteth all future uses contingent Page 9 27. H. 8. Transferreth the possession to uses onely In esse ib. When a remainder ought to vest ib. 27. H. 8. Of uses shall not be taken by equity ib. A diversity when Tenant for life infeoffeth the reversioner mediate and when imediate there it is no forfeiture ib. A disseissor may make admittances but not voluntary grants Page 11 A difference when a confirmation is made to one that is in upon an expresse condition and when not there the estate is absolute ib. Every fee simple may be charged one way or other Page 12 A difference betweene Terminus annorum Tempus annorum Page 13 A Termor grants to B. so many yeares as shall be behind Tempore mortis suae it is void otherwise if for a certeine number of yeares ib. A lease cannot comence upon a double contingency Page 14 He who hath a power of revocation may doe it part at one time and part at another time till he hath revoked all Page 15 By the same conveyance the old uses may be revoked and new raised Page 16 Vpon what conveyances uses may be raised upon a generall consideration Page 16 17 An Action of
be divided For he had not the Mannor of H. for his Wife had it joyntly with him See many excellent Cases in the Booke at large adjudged upon this word Having in the Statutes the Initium of a Will ought to be full and perfect which is the writing and therefore if the devisor command one to write his Will and he devises white Acre to A. and his Heires and black Acre to B. and his Heires and dyes before the devise to B. is written yet the devise to A. is good But if he devises to A. c. upon condition and he writes the devise and the Testator dyes before the Writing of the condition t is voyd for in the one case the devises are severall and the one is perfect in the other Case t is maimed and imperfect for the intire devise was not fully put in writing so t was resolved in the Case at Barre that neither the commencement nor the end of the Will was full or perfect for at the time of writing of it and at the death of the devisor he had no power in respect of the joynt estate in H. to dispose all the Mannor of T. which amounts to the value of two parts of all Also upon the first Branch he ought to have a sole estate and here his Wife is joyntly seised with him and shee cannot disagree during coverture The Statute gives liberty to him for to devise two parts by will but this is to be intended of such Land which he might convey by act executed but here by reason of the undivided estate of the Wife he cannot dispose it but during coverture Also the third part of cleere yearly value is saved to the King and the intent of the Statute was that the King shall have the equall benefit at least for his third part as the devisee hath for two parts but here the devisee had two parts absolutely and the King but a possibility Viz. If the Wife would disagree which is at her pleasure and this Statute hath been constru'd that equality should be observed A man which held three Mannors of three Lords could not devise two of them but two parts of every one upon these words Cleere yearly value 't was said that of Inheritances which are not of any yearly value some are devisable some not as Bona et catalla felonum fugit or utlagat Fines amerciaments within such a Mannor or Towne these cannot be devised nor left to discend but a Leete Waife or Stray or other hereditament appendant or appurtenant to a Mannor passe by devise of the Mannor with th' appurtenances as incidents and the Statute had no intent for to dismember these things which by lawfull prescription had beene united But if a hundred with goods of Fellons Outlaws Fines Amerciaments returne of Writts and such other casuall hereditaments within the same hundred have beene accustomably demised for a yearely rent they may be devised within the purview of the said Act. 'T was said upon the words of the Statute which says that he may devise a rent common c. Out of two parts that a devise of a rent of the full value out of all is voyd but out of two parts 't is good And 't was observed that upon 32. H. 8. a devile of all his land had beene good for two parts as adjudged in Vntons Case for Land is severable but a rent is a thing intire and 34. H. 8. onely gives authority for to devise it The second branch which speakes of division cannot be satisfied for during his life he himselfe could not Set it out and after his death it survives to the Wife The third and fourth branch is not satisfied in this word immediatly for till disagreement without question the Mannor of H. survived to the Wife and if an Office had beene found before disagreement without doubt the Queene should have a third part of the Mannor of T. and the devise being voyd at the death of the devisor the third part lawfully vested in the Heire by discent it cannot be made good and devested by a subsequent disagreement Littleton discent to the Heire of Tenant by the courtesy of a disseissoresse doth not take away entry for the Heire comes not in immediatly 't was agreed if a man devises two acres holden by Knights service and a reversion upon a Lease for life discends to the heire this is no immediate discent within the Statute but the third part of the two ought to discend see many excellent Cases of devises adjudged upon the Statute Another good Case of relations Jennings and Braggs Case a disseisee makes an Indenture purporting a Lease for yeares and delivers it to a stranger out of the Land as an Escroule and commands him for to enter and deliver this as his deed to the Lessee who doth it and adjudged a good Lease and this diversity agreed First When the person at the first delivery hath not ability to make the contract and before the second delivery hath 't is voyd as an Infant and a Fème covert otherwise when at first delivery the person hath ability but cannot perfect it till an impediment removed which is done before the second delivery there 't is good as at Barre Resolved secondly that to some intent the second delivery shall have relation to the former by fiction of Law Vt res magis valeat quam pereat as if a Feme sole deliver a Lease as an escroule and after takes Husband or dyes yet by the second delivery 't is a good deed Ab initio and to some intent Vt res magis valeat c. it shall not relate yet in truth the second delivery hath all its force by the first and is but an execution and consummation of the former as at Barre for if it should relate to the first delivery then it would avoyd the lease for it should be made by one who was out of possession fictio legis inique operatur alicui damnum vel injuriam Thirdly 't was resolved that as to collaterall acts that there shall be no relation Omninò as if the Obligee release before the second delivery such release is voyd Ratcliffes case 34. of the Queene fo 37. A. Feme sole devises Socage land to the sonne of her daughter in taile the remainder to two Sisters of the devisee and to the heires of their two bodies by equall portions to be divided the remainder in fee to the Mother of the daughters and dyes the sonne dyes without issue Martha one of the daughters dwelling in her Mothers house daughter of the devisor within the age of 16. and above 14. departed at the second houre in the night with the consent of the husband of her Mother in whose house she was 8. miles and there married E. R. the issue was whether E.R. the Mother had the custody of the said M. at the time of the contract and marriage aforesaid for if she had then the
land of M. was lost by the Statute of 4. and 5. P. and M. ca ' 8. Resolved that there were two manners of custodies or Gardianships the one by the common law the other by the Statute at common Law foure manner of Gardians viz Gardian in Chivalry Socage Nature by Nurture The first two are fully described in our Bookes but great controversie was at barre for Gardian by Nature Some held that the Father onely shall have the custody of his sonne and heire apparent within age not the Mother Grandfather c. Also that the Father shall not have the custody of his daughter and heire for it ought to be such an heire as shall continue sole and apparent heire as the Father shall not have the custody of the youngest sonne in Borough English for tenure in Chivalry Others affirme that not onely the Father but every auncestor male or female shall have the custody of his heire apparent male or female Trespas quare 〈◊〉 consanguinium haeredem of the plaintiffe cujus maritagium ad ipsum pertinet c. rapuit c. lyes The Mother though she had no land brought ravishment of ward of J. her Sonne and heire against the grandfather who had land that might descend By the Court both erre for 't is true that every auncestor shall have trespas or ravishment of ward against a stranger for his heire male or female and the Writ shall say Cujus maritagium ad ipsum pertinet and good reason for the establishment of his house consists upon providing of a convenient marriage for his heire apparant and it matters not of what age such heire is but such action lyes not against gardian in chivalry by any of his auncestors but the Father So the Court resolved here the Mother could not be gardian in Socage if the land had descended to the daughter nor by nurture because she was above 14. but the common Law gives remedy against a Stranger as aforesaid Resolved here the Mother shall have the custody within the provision of the Act which hath ordained two new manners of custodies 1. By reason of nature 2. By assignation the first the Father after his death the Mother the second by assignation of the Father by his will or any act in his life See the Booke at large for the exposition of this Statute Resolved that the assent of the husband was not materiall for the Statute hath annexed the custody to the person of the Mother jure naturae which is inseperable and by marriage cannot be transferred to the husband the Father shall not forfeit the wardship by outlawry nor shall his Executors have it Resolved though she departed out of the house sixe houres before the contract yet in judgement of Law the Mother had the custody at the time of the contract for 't is inseperably annexed to the person of the Mother Resolved that by this devise the two daughters wete tenants in common in taile by these words equally to be divided though they never make partition in facto and so it hath been often adjudged Resolved that the husband and wife damsell had good title upon this verdict against the other daughter for by these words to the next of kin to whom the inheritance should c. come after her decease during the life of such person who shall so contract c. it seemes the daughter shall not have the forfeiture for though she be of the blood yet if M. dye her issue shall have the land if without issue the Mother in the remainder To the objection that the Mother cannot have it for she is not of the blood of the daughter but econtra Father or Mother are not next to whom administration shall be granted and land shall escheate rather then it shall goe to Father or Mother Resolved often against 5. E. 6. that the Father or Mother are next to whom administration may be granted and Littleton says that the Father is neerer of blood then the Uncle and therefore the Father shall have a remainder limitted to the next of blood of the Sonne but he shall not have an inheritance by discent from the Sonne for a Maxime prohibits it And 't was said at barre if he in reversion had been brother of the halfe blood he might have entered as Proximus de sanguine yet none of the halfe blood could inherit See the Booke at large where is excellent learning of discents as also the learning of Possessio fratris c. Resolved by the Court that it doth not come in question who shall enter for the forfeiture by the Statute for the issue was joyned upon a collaterall point whether the Mother had the custody at the time of the contract and the finding of the Jury is not materiall and therefore though the Plaintiffe who was lessee of the husband of the damsell as appeared had good title against the defendant being lessee of the husband of the other Sister yet because the issue was found against him judgement was given Quod nihil capiat c. Boytons case 35. Eliz. in Banco regis fo 43. A Writ of cap ad satisfaciendum is retornable at Westminster die Lunae prox post Crastin Animarū the partie is arrested the Sheriffe is not bound to bring the prisoner in recta Linea from the place where he was arrested or from the Countie But if he have the prisoner in Court at the day of the returne being never out of his custody in the meane season it is good But if a Sheriffe or a Bayliffe assent that one who is in execution and under their custody to goe out of the Gaole for a time and then to returne yet although he returne at the time it is an escape And so it is likewise if a Sheriffe suffer him to goe with a Bayliffe or a Keeper for the Sheriffe ought to have him in arcta custodia the Statute of Westminster 2. cap. 11. says Quod carceri manucipentur in ferris So as the Sheriffe may keepe him in yron and fetters to the intent that they may sooner satisfie their Creditors The Sheriffe upon a Habeas corpus for one in execution may bring the partie what way he will so as he have his bodie at the day according to the Writ If one in execution escape out of the Gaole and fly into another Countie the Sheriffe upon fresh suite taketh him again before any action brought against the Sheriffe the Judges have adjudged this no escape and if one in execution escape de son tort and be taken againe he shall never have an audita querela because a man shall not take advantage of his own wrong Sir George Brownes case 36. of the Queene fo 50. ISsue in speciall taile the remainder to himselfe in fee in the life of his Mother tenant in speciall taile levies a Fine in truth with Proclamations though they were not found to Sir G. B. the Mother living the Sonne leased for three lives