the very Day of the date which the Lord Hobart says is by reason of the intent of the Law and not by the Letter Hob. 139. Moor 40. and 42. acc ' tho' it is there said that such an Enrolment had been adjudged void See Latch 14. Tender of 50 l. in Stone IN the Case of Hooks and Swain 1 Siderfin 151. Twisden says he remembred this nice Case Sir William Fish was bound by Obligation to pay such a Day in Gray's Inn Hall fifty Pounds generally without saying of Money and therefore upon the Day when the Gentlemen were at Supper Sir William came in and tendered fifty pound weight of Stone and adjudged no tender See Owen 64. where Plowden says Libra in Latin signifies a Weight yet if one is bound in Vigint Libris and forfeits his Bond he must pay Money and not Lead or the like Witnesses ONE burned in the Hand for a Felony may be a Witness in a Cause by Rolls Chief Justice for he may purchase Land and his fault is purged by his punishment Stiles Rep. 388. and Pract. Reg. 571. If an Action be brought against two and at the Assizes the Plaintiff proceeds only against one of them the other may be allowed a Witnes in the Cause Godb. Case 418. The Sheriff arrests a Man looking out of his Window c. WHEN an Execution is lawfully begun or hath a legal Commencement the Sheriff may justifie the breaking of the Parties House to take him otherwise if there be no legal Commencement This diversity was taken and agreed for Law in Sir William Fish his Case Sir William was looking out of his Window and the Sheriff per fenestram delivered to him a Capias ad Satisfac to take the said Fish and apprehend him and Fish escaped from him and the Sheriff broke the door of his House maintenant and retook him and adjudged lawful because there was a lawful beginning of the Execution before which was presently pursued Palmer's Rep. 53. Vide Hobart fol. 62. That a Sheriff cannot upon private process rush into a House which by craft as knocking at the Door c. he procured to be opened unto him and there the first entry was held unlawful for the opening of the Door was occasioned by craft and then used to the Violence intended Sanlder IF a Man say to another Thou art a Rogue and a Pocky Rogue and the Pox haunts thee twice a Year an Action lies for hereby 't is apparent he intended the great Pox because these are wont to grieve those that have them bis per annum viz in the Spring and Autumn Prekington's Case 1 Roll. 66 67. Where Circumstances shew the apparent intention of Words doubtful in themselves that they are slanderous an Action lies for them as where one said of a Woman That she did lie with a Weaver of Colchester in a Dutch and the Weaver's Breeches were down and they were at it an Action lies for altho' the Weaver might lie with her in a Ditch without harm yet the latter Words shew he intended that the Weaver had carnal Knowledge of her Roll. 1 Rep. 420. Root and Molyne's Case I know what I am and I know what the Plaintiff is I never Buggered a Mare Per. Cur ' tho' no grammatical affirmation is a sufficient scandal yet being found with such intention and so imagined by the Hearers the Ironical speaking will not excuse Jud. pro Quaer ' 3 Keb. 546. Slander A. SAYS to B. One of Us two is Perjured B. says to A. It is not I and A. says again I am sure it is not I B. shall have an Action for these words for the subsequent Words shew apparently that he intends Him 1 Roll. 75. Coe and Chambers Justice Twisden said he remembred a Shooe-maker brought an Action for saying He was a Cobler and tho' a Cobler be a Trade of it self yet 't was held the Action lay in Chief Justice Glyn's time Mod. Rep. fol. 19. Margaret Commings brought an Action for these Words viz. Thou art a Whore and a base burnt Arse Whore and adjudged Actionable 2 Siderf fol. 5. the French Pox usually comes of burning Cro. Eliz. 2. but 't is left a Quaere there whether the Words Thou art a burnt Whore will bear an Action Not Guilty A MAN may plead Not Guilty yet tell no lye for by the Law no Man is bound to accuse himself so that when I say Not Guilty the meaning is as if I should say by way of Paraphrase I am not so guilty as to tell you if you will bring me to a Tryal and have me punished for what you lay to my charge prove it against me Selden Presentation IF I am seized of an Advowson and I present to it as Procurator to a Stranger this shall be an Usurpation upon my self for the Stranger So if I present to an Advowson whereof I my self am seized as Attorney to a Stranger this is an Usurpation for him 17 E. 3. 60. Where a Child may choose his Father IF a Man has a Wife and dies and within a very short time after the Wife marries again and within nine Months hath a Child so as it may be the Child of the one or the other some have said that in this Case the Child may choose his Father Quia in hoc casu Filiatio non potest probari for avoiding of which question and other inconveniences the Law before the Conquest was Sit omnis Vidua sine Marito duodecim mensibus si maritaverit perdat dotem 1 Inst 8. a. See Finch his Law 117. that if one die his Wife priviment enseint i. e. so with Child as it is not discerned and she take another Husband the Issue born within a Month or such a time as it is impossible he should beget it shall be accounted the Son of her first Husband and cites 21 E. 3. 29. 'T is said the Law now is That if a Wife bring forth a Child begotten by a former Husband or any other before marriage but born after marriage with another Man this latter must own the Child who shall be his Heir at Law Assault IF a Man assault me I am not bound to attend untill he strikes but I may lay him on before in my own defence for it may be I shall come too late afterwards 2 H. IV. 8. per Curiam Wearing a Sword no breach of the Good Behaviour THE Wearing of a Sword after one is bound to his Good Behaviour is no breach of the Good Behaviour now as perhaps it was heretofore see Cromp. Justice of Peace 119. 126. when Swords were not usually worn but by Soldiers for then they struck as great a Terror in People as a Blunderbuss does now But since at this Day Swords are usually worn by all sorts of People this cannot now be construed a breach of the Good Behaviour So that which heretofore was a Crime is now by Custom become none Hawles Remarks c. 81. Slander ACTION will
for Misadventure for that such their Play was by consent and because there was no former Malice but done only for disport and trial of Manhood Dalt 352. See tit Justs and Chance-medley in hoc Libro Justification in case of Necessity THE Ferry-Man of Gravesend took Forty seven Passengers into his Barge to go to London amongst whom was one Mouse the Barge being upon the Water a great Tempest arose insomuch that the Barge and all the Passengers were in danger to be drowned if a Hogshead of Wine and other ponderous things were not cast out among which things there was a Casket with 113 l. of Mouse's which I. S. took and threw over-board whereupon Mouse brought Trespass c. It was resolved per Curiam that in case of necessity for saving the Passengers lives it was lawful for I. S. being a Passenger to cast the Plaintiff's Casket out of the Barge with what was in it Quod quis obtutelam corporis sui fecerit jure id fecisse videtur and 't was directly proved that the Men had been drowned if the things had not been heaved out But 't was agreed also that the Owners in such Case shall have their Remedy upon the surcharge against the Ferry-Man and if there is no surcharge but the danger comes by the Act of God then every one must bear his own Loss 12 Rep. 63. and 2 Roll. 567. One may justifie the felling of a Tree in the Ground of another in Case of necessity 6 E. 4. 8. See 22 Assise 5 6. that a Man may justifie the beating another if he be in a Rage So Estrays may be fettered if they are fierce and unruly Hut Rep. 67. and Winch 67 124. If a Man has a way over my Land for his Cattle to pass and they in passing eat the Grass against his Will this is justifiable 2 Roll. 566 567. Reeve and Downs Note this for a Rule That in all Trespasses there must be a voluntary Act and also a damage otherwise an Action of Trespass lies not In Trespass for Ploughing his Land the Defendant said the Plaintiff's Land is adjoyning to his and that when he was Ploughing his own Land the Horses were unruly and by violence carried the Plough into the Land of the Plaintiff contra voluntatem suam and held a good Justification for if a Man be doing a lawful Act which afterwards becomes illegal against his Will that is damnum sine injuria 22 E. 4. 8. One cannot justifie a Trespass upon another for fear IN Trespass for breaking of a House and Close the Defendant pleaded that Duodecem homines ignoti modo querrino armati tantum minabantur ei quod de vitae suae amissione dubitabat and after requirabant compulsabant the Defendant to go with 'em to the House quodque ob timorem minarum per mandatum compulsionem dictorum duodecem hominum he did enter the said Close and House and returned immediately through the said Close which is the same Trespass c. Adj. no Plea upon demurrer for one cannot justifie a Trespass upon another for fear and the Defendant has remedy against those that compelled him the pleading too was naught because he did not shew that the way to the House was through the Close Allen 35. Gilbert and Stone vide the same Case Stiles 72. with this further reason that the Person injured shall have no satisfaction if such Plea be allowed for he cannot have it of those that threatened But see Stiles 65. in Trespass pedibus ambulando the Defendant pleads he was carried upon the Land by force and violence of others and was not there voluntarily which is the same Trespass c. upon Demurrer Roll. Justice said it is the Trespass of the Party that carried the Defendant upon the Land and not the Defendant's Trespass as he that drives my Cattel into anothers Land is the Trespassor and not I who am the owner of the Cattle Presumption of Law IN many Cases the Law will admit no proof against what it presumes Therefore If a Rent be behind for 20. Years and the Lord make an Acquittance for the last that is due all the rest are presumed to be paid against which presumption the Law will admit no proof Dyer 271. a. 11 H. IV. 55. So if a Man be within the Four Seas and his Wife hath a Child the Law presumes it is the Child of the Husband and will admit no proof to the contrary 7 H. IV. 9. 1 Inst 373. a. unless the Husband be castrated 1 Roll. 358. An innocent person is accused of Felony and being afraid flies for it tho' he after judicially acquit himself thereof yet if it be found that he fled for the same he shall forfeit notwithstanding his innocency all his Goods and Chattels Debts and Duties for as to the forfeiture of these the Law will allow no Proof against the presumption in Law grounded upon his flight 1 Inst 373. a. b. So if the Uncle of the Issue releases with Warranty to the Discontinuee of Tenant in tail and dies without Issue this is a collateral Warranty to the Issue in tail barring him without any Assets or Estate descended from him that made the Warranty the Law presuming that the Uncle would not unnaturally disinherit his Lawful Heir being of his own Blood of that right which himself never had without leaving him greater Advancements 1 Inst 373. a. Forfeiture TWO Joynt-Tenants for Life the one grants his Estate for the Life of his Companion it was held a Forfeiture for first it is a severance of the Joynture and then a Lease for another's Life 4 Leon. 236. Remainder for the Life of Tenant for Life good IF a Remainder be limited to one for term of the Life of Tenant for Life the Remainder is good but for this reason only because that by possibility the Tenant for Life may alien in Fee and so forfeit his Estate whereby the Remainder shall enter for the Forfeiture and enjoy the Estate during the Life of the Tenant for Life who committed such forfeiture Co. 2. 50 51. The King of Spain Out-lawed in Westminster-Hall THE King of Spain was Out-lawed in Westminster-Hall I being of Councel against him says Selden the Case was this A Merchant had recovered Costs against him in a Suit which because he could not get we advised to have him Out-lawed for not appearing and so he was As soon as Gondimer heard it he presently sent the Money by reason that if his Master had been Out-lawed he could not have the benefit of the Law which would have been very prejudicial to him there being then many Suits depending betwixt the King of Spain and our English Merchants Vide Stiles Pract. Reg. 382. that Mich. 22. Car. B. R. the King of Spain was Non-Suit in England for if a foreign Prince will have benefit of the National Laws here he must proceed and abide by the Rules and Orders of the Court wherein he prefers his
carriage being ill beloved in the Country was found Guilty but reprieved by the Judges and hearing the Lord Treasurer had a Secretary of his Name applied himself to him promising to give him all his Estate having no Children if his Lord would bring him out of the danger he was in which by his power with the King he did and the Secretary within a short time after by the others death enjoyed an ample Estate Stewes and Brothel-Houses KING Henry VIII suppressed all the Stews or Brothel-Houses which long had continued on the Bank-side in Southwark and those infamous Women were not buried in Christian Burial when they were dead nor permitted to receive the rites of the Church whilst they lived This was by Proclamation under the Great Seal 30 Martii 37 H VIII Before the Reign of H. VII there were Eighteen of these Houses and that King for a time forbad them But afterwards Twelve only were permitted and had Signs painted on their Walls as The Cardinal's Hat The Boar's Head The Cross Keys c Stow. and 3 Inst 205. Many wicked and common Women had seated themselves in a Lane called Water-Lane next to the House of the Friers Carmelites in Fleet-street this being known King Edw. III. to the end these Friers might perform their Vows one of which was To live in perpetual Chastity took order for removing of these Women ibid. So odious and dangerous was this Vice the fairest end whereof is Beggery that Men in making of Leases of their Houses did add an express Condition That the Lessee c. should not suffer harbour or keep any Feme putiene within the said Houses ibid. 206. Nota Tho' Adultery and Fornication be punishable by the Ecclesiastical Law yet the keeping of a Bawdy-House being as it were a Common Nusance is punishable by indictment at the Common Law by Fine and Imprisonment ibid. Accessary IF I. S. counsel or command one to kill a Man and he kill another or to burn one Man's House and he burn another's or to steal a Horse and he steal a Cow or to steal a black Horse and he steal a white one or to steal a Goldsmith's Plate from him going to such a Fair and he go to his Shop in Cheapside and rob him there and break open his House to do it in these Cases the Counsellor shall not be Accessary because this is another Felony Plowd 475. But if one command a Felony and it be done in another Fashion Time or Place only than it was commanded he may be Accessary to it As if one bid another to rob I. D. on Shooters-Hill and he does it on Gads-Hill or to rob him one day and he does it another day or to do it himself and he does it by another or to kill him by Poyson and he does it by a Sword in all these Cases he shall be an Accessary ibid. See Stamf. 1. 45. If one counsel a Woman to murder the Child in her Body and after the Child is born alive and then she murders it in the absence of him that gave her the Counsel in this case he is an Accessary Dyer 186. Plowd 475. One Saunders had Poyson given him by another to poyson his Wife the Husband gave it to his Wife in a roasted Apple who eat part of it and gave the rest to her Daughter being an Infant the Wife recovered but the Child died and it was held That he that gave it for the Wife was not accessary to the murder of the Daughter For the Consent must not be extended farther than it was given Plowd 474. Saunder's Case Yet if I perswade or command one to go and beat another Man only and he do beat him and kill him by this I am made Accessary not only to the Beating but to the Murder for I commanded the unlawful Act which caused his death So it is Murder to kill one tho' the Malice be against another as if I strike at A. and kill B. because I had a malicious and felonious intent Felony to cut out Tongues Eyes c. BEFORE the Statute of 5. H. IV. cap. 5. which makes it Felony to cut out the Tongue or put out the Eyes of any of the King's Subjects of malice prepensed the mischief was that when one had been beaten wounded or robbed the Misdoers to the end the Party grieved might not be able to accuse them cut out their Tongues or put out their Eyes pretending the same to be no Felony which is therefore ordained and established to be so by this Act which has so terrified offenders that where before it was every days practice now it is very rarely done See 3 Inst 62. It extends not to cutting off Ears which is no Felony as appears by the Stat. of 37 H. VIII cap. 6. The offender had the benefit of his Clergy but that is now taken away by Stat. 22 and 23 Car. II. cap. 11. which enacts that if any Person on purpose and of malice fore-thought and by lying in wait shall unlawfully cut out or disable the Tongue put out an Eye slit the Nose cut off a Nose or Lip or cut off or disable any Limb or Member of any Subject of his Majesty with intention in so doing to Maim or Disfigure him in any of these Manners he is declared a Felon without benefit of Clergy But Note by this Act it is provided that he shall forfeit neither Lands Goods or Chattels The cutting off a Man's Privy Members was Felony by the Common Law for Bracton lib. 3. fol. 144. b. says Quid dicitur si quis alterius virilia absciderit illum libidinis causa vel convitii castraverit tenetur sive hoc volens fecerit vel invitus sequitur poena aliquando capitalis aliquando perpetuum exilium cum omni bonorum ademptione Agreeable to this is the Record in Bracton's time viz. Henricus Hall A. uxor ejus capti detenti sunt in Prisonâ de Evil-chester eo quod rectati fuerunt quod ipsi absciderunt virilia Johannis Monachi quem idem Henricus deprehendit cum praedictâ A. uxore ejus c. But Fleta says lib. 1. cap. 38. Si quis Castratus fuerit talis pro Mahemiato poterit adjudicari And so was the Law holden in my Lord Coke's time as he says 3 Inst 63. and 118. Where an Attaint lies tho' every word of the Verdict be true A MAN shall have an Attaint in some special Case where every Word of the Verdict is true As if one hath had Common Appendant to his Land time out of mind and brings an Assise of the Common and makes Title that he hath had Common time out of mind c. without speaking of the Appendancy and it is found for him The Defendant shall have an Attaint for the Plaintiffs Title is for Common in Gross and not Common Appendant yet the words of the Verdict are true that he hath had Common time out of mind c. but not
first Marry that one shall have Fee they enter Marry neither of them shall have Fee for the Uncertainty 1 Inst 218. a. Where one shall have Judgment to be hanged after he is slain IN an Appeal of Death the Defendant waged Battel and was slain in the Field yet Judgment was given that he should be hanged which the Judges said was altogether necessary for otherwise the Lord could not have a Writ of Escheat 1 Inst 390. b. One Attainted after his Death THE Lord Coke observes that in Eire it has been seen that a Man hath been attainted after his Death by Presentment 1 Inst 390. b. Execution before Judgment UPON Issue joyned and Tryal thereupon a Verdict was found for the Plaintiff and the Postea was delivered to the Clerk of the Judgments to enter the Judgment but through the Clerk's neglect Execution was taken out before it was entred Hereupon the Court was moved to supersede the Execution because there was no Judgment to warrant it Roll said it being but a neglect of the Clerk Judgment might well enough be entred tho' the Execution were issued forth and because the Trial between the Parties is right Stiles 229. Where a Grant to a Monk shall be good AN English Man goes into France and there becomes a Monk yet is he capable of any Grant in England because such Profession is not triable and also because all Profession is taken away by Statute and by our Religion holden as void so adjudged in Ley's Case p. tot cur 2 Roll. 43. Nor will such Profession abroad disable him to bring any Action here because it wants Trial so that of foreign Profession the Common Law takes no knowledge 1 Inst 132. b. The Freehold discontinued and not the Reversion HUSBAND and Wife Lease the Lands of the Wife by Deed for Life reserving a Rent the Husband dies This was a discontinuance at Common Law for Life and yet the Reversion was not discontinued but remained in the Wife Otherwise if the Husband had made the Lease alone 1 Inst 333. a. Reversion Revested yet the Discontinuance remains FEME Tenant for Life the Baron makes a Feoffment and the Lessor enters for the Forfeiture here is the Reversion revested and yet the Discontinuance remains at the Common Law for the Wife was put to her cui in vita and could not enter after her Husband's Death 1 Inst 335. a. Where the Defendant may pray and have Judgment against himself IN Assumpsit to pay several Summs at several days if the Action be brought for default of payment at the first day before any other day of payment is incurred and the Defendant plead Non Assumpsit which is found against him but the Plaintiff will not enter Judgment for fear of being barred to have a new Action upon the same promise if default be in the other payments yet may the Defendant enter Judgment according to the Verdict if he will 2 Roll. 97. Shapeland and Curtis Vide Dyer 194. n. 34. and 2 Roll. 97. That if a Verdict be found for the Defendant and he will not pray Judgment yet Judgment shall be given for him at the prayer of the Plaintiffs because then he may have his Attaint against the Jury Where the Plaintiff shall have Judgment tho' the Issue be found against him IN Replevin the Defendant avowed for a Rent of 20 l. supposing that I. S. was seized in Fee of the place where c. and in 28th of Eliz. granted a Rent of 20 l. per annum and for the Rent arrear an 12 Jac. he avows c. it was found specially upon issue Non concessit that T. S. was seized in Fee and let that Land an 23 Eliz. to I. S. for 21 Years and he so possessed granted that Rent and fi c. upon this Verdict tho' the Issue be found Quod concessit and so for the Avowant yet because it appears that the Estate out of which the Rent is granted was determined a long time before the distress taken so that the Defendant had not any title to avow 't was held That Judgment should be for the Plaintiff tho' the Issue was found against him 2 Cro. 442. Harrison and Metcalf See 2 Cro. 221. 435. 640. Cro. Eliz. 157. Agent and Patient IT is a Rule in Law that Idem non potest esse Agens Patiens and therefore a Man cannot present himself to a Benefice make himself an Officer nor Sue himself and therefore when one having right to Land has the Freehold cast upon him by a latter Title he shall be said in of his ancient Title because there is none against whom he may Sue but himself and he cannot Sue himself Littleton 147. b. So no Man can summon himself and therefore if a Sheriff suffer a common recovery it is Error because he cannot summon himself Dyer 188. a. Owen 51. A Man cannot be both Judge and Party in a Suit and therefore if a Judge of the Common Pleas be made Judge of the King's Bench tho' it be but hâc vice it determines his Patent for the Common Pleas for if he should be Judge of both Benches together he should controul his own Judgment for if the Common Pleas err it shall be reformed in the King 's Bench. See Cro. Car. 600. Littleton Chief Justice of the Common Pleas made Lord Keeper yet continued Chief Justice so Sir Orlando Bridgman was both Lord Keeper and Lord Chief Justice of the Common Pleas at the same time for these places are not inconstent 1 Siderf 338 365. A Bishop cannot hold a Parsonage by Commendam within his own Diocess because he cannot visit himself or be Parson and Ordinary too 1 Siderf 305. If a Fine be levied to a Judge of the Common Pleas he himself cannot take the Connsance for he cannot be his own Judge But if an Action be sued in C. B. against all the Judges there there for necessity they shall be their own Judges 2 Roll. 92 93. But Note in many cases the same Person may be Agent and Patient where the Law cannot do otherwise as a Feme Tenant in socage may endow herself de la pluis beale Lit. Sect. 48. So an Executor may pay himself by Retainer So where one may vouch himself 1 Inst 390. a. So where one limits a Remainder to himself If one of the Chapter being sole seized enfeoffe the Dean and Chapter by that he himself shall take by his own Livery Perk. Fol. 42. See Hob. 138 139. A Mittimus directed to the Bishop of Durham commanding him to send a Record to the Justices of the County Palatine to be tried there is well enough and may be executed by the Bishop tho' he himself be one of the Justices So one may be Judge and Officer diversis respectibus as in a Redisseisin the Sheriff is Judge and Officer Cro. Car. 138. So where a Mayor keeps the Goal Cro. Eliz. 76. Where one Impannelled on a Jury may challenge himself A PEER of